Speaker 1: Mhm.
Speaker 2: Stand by please hmm. One more time.
Speaker 1: Is it going? Oh?
Speaker 2: Well, there you have it. Okay, one more thing. I'm
Speaker 2: trying to do Brady Yan today. So it forces you
Speaker 2: to wait until you already started a stream in order
Speaker 2: to set it. So that's what I'm doing right now. Boom.
Speaker 2: Hopefully that will not only play live, but it says
Speaker 2: no view. What does that mean? Let's make sure that's
Speaker 2: really yes? It most certainly is okay? Good? All right
Speaker 2: now making internet as soon as I start. I wouldn't
Speaker 2: have to deal with that if I had a computer
Speaker 2: that I'd be allowed to use my cable on. Hey guys,
Speaker 2: if you aren't already aware the computer drive fund, it's
Speaker 2: still ongoing. We got about plus or minus five hundred
Speaker 2: somewhere around there, and it's going to be crucial that
Speaker 2: we get to that goal as soon as possible because
Speaker 2: things are falling apart rapidly on this computer. I'm just
Speaker 2: gonna be honest with you, it's very frustrating to do these.
Speaker 2: My time off that I took to finish the orders
Speaker 2: was a God said, because right now we could be
Speaker 2: eliminated at any given time because of this stupid century
Speaker 2: link that I have to deal with in order to
Speaker 2: use this computer because I can't put my other Internet
Speaker 2: onto it. Let me just go ahead and show you here,
Speaker 2: right here is the gifts and go you click that.
Speaker 2: This is in the description of the video that you're watching,
Speaker 2: all right, and bush Master, you're the man, So we're
Speaker 2: probably right around I'm gonna say that when this one
Speaker 2: hits the account, I'm probably its probably gonna be like
Speaker 2: around fifteen something fifteen fifty, so we're maybe four to
Speaker 2: fifty away from the goal, which is good. All right,
Speaker 2: So the Computer Joy Fund, I put an update in
Speaker 2: here recently give you a little background. I think I
Speaker 2: read it the last video. So there's that, all right, please,
Speaker 2: and thank you and thank you to all who have
Speaker 2: Now today we're going to be going over quite a
Speaker 2: few things. We're going to start our series on pay
Speaker 2: Shop and past two or this could go on for
Speaker 2: a long time, or I could sum it up quite quickly,
Speaker 2: but I want to read from the books that most
Speaker 2: people don't even know exist, and in part the ideas
Speaker 2: and the facts, true facts that most people don't know.
Speaker 2: And that's going to be And if they didn't know,
Speaker 2: they wouldn't be taking shots. They wouldn't be allowing their
Speaker 2: children to be injected, and they shares how wouldn't be
Speaker 2: messing around with MDS at all. So let us begin, however,
Speaker 2: and you do it. I'm just going to fix something
Speaker 2: real quick so that when I do this you can
Speaker 2: also see in here. Click clickity clickity click. It's a
Speaker 2: little frustrating, all right. So before we get into all that,
Speaker 2: we need to address what's been going on around us.
Speaker 2: And I'm going to read a few things for them
Speaker 2: certain sources. So this is in relation to North Carolina specifically,
Speaker 2: not really talking about Tennessee here it says, here's an
Speaker 2: important and heartbreaking update our local team in Robinsonville, North Carolina,
Speaker 2: with family members assisting in recovery efforts. As reported a
Speaker 2: devastating news, local crews have already tagged nine hundred bodies
Speaker 2: near the bit More area, and tragically more are expected.
Speaker 2: Some victims have even been found in trees. This is
Speaker 2: just surreal. Please be aware that gas stations are now
Speaker 2: cash only and fuel supplies are becoming limited. Tensions are
Speaker 2: rising with reports of people fighting over gas and tragically
Speaker 2: one person has been shot. There's been a lot of
Speaker 2: looting going on that's the more recent information, and this
Speaker 2: one says, just got down from the mountains, delivered supplies
Speaker 2: families with kids, haven't ate, should be eaten, haven't eaten
Speaker 2: or had water in three days before I got there,
Speaker 2: multiple counties completely shut off from every utility, including water guys.
Speaker 2: FEMA is currently confiscating donations and blocking volunteers. Let me
Speaker 2: repeat that. First of all, what the hell is FEMA
Speaker 2: doing there in the first place. Why is in the
Speaker 2: National Guarden handling it? Why aren't the people us coming
Speaker 2: to the aid of our neighbors. Why does this have
Speaker 2: to be and if they do, why would they be
Speaker 2: doing that unless they want mass casualties, unless they want
Speaker 2: There might be something and we're going to discuss this.
Speaker 2: There might be something that they don't want us to
Speaker 2: see down there. FEMA is currently confiscating donations and blocking volunteers.
Speaker 2: I fear we might need a militia to inhibit or
Speaker 2: stop FEMA. As crazy as that as it sous now,
Speaker 2: this could be fed bait posting right here. Who knows
Speaker 2: FEMA is directly confiscating donated items and blocking volunteers from helping,
Speaker 2: kicking or just out of parking lots et cetera. I
Speaker 2: don't put it past them, but to stoke that idea
Speaker 2: in the public, I think that, you know, could be
Speaker 2: a trap, could be a way to set off disarmament,
Speaker 2: all kinds of stuff, because we are and this is
Speaker 2: something to remember ever since the bankruptcy of nineteen thirty three.
Speaker 2: They later afterward reworded it to implicate that we the
Speaker 2: people of the United States, we the people of America,
Speaker 2: because I don't want to confuse that with corporate United
Speaker 2: States are enemies of the state. And what does that mean? Well,
Speaker 2: it means that what do you do with an enemy?
Speaker 2: You subdue them, subjugate them summarily and indifferently murder them.
Speaker 2: And oh, look, we have a medical system that does
Speaker 2: that for us, that does that for them. So this
Speaker 2: one says, I'm guessing they're talking to each other in
Speaker 2: an email or text messenger says, Babe, Fema is throwing
Speaker 2: away food that people are bringing in to donate, and
Speaker 2: he says no. The lady that tunes, I think that
Speaker 2: means runs, but probably just you know, voice texting that runs.
Speaker 2: A dollar general said to somebody that they rubbed out
Speaker 2: when he ran in to grab more spoons. She said
Speaker 2: hopefully FEMA doesn't throw away all that food he made.
Speaker 2: He was like, what, no news would report that? And
Speaker 2: this one says, if you think you're safe from weather control,
Speaker 2: consider that Ashville, North Carolina, a city nearly three hundred
Speaker 2: miles from the nearest coastline and an elevation of two
Speaker 2: thy one hundred and thirty four feet, just got wiped
Speaker 2: out by a hurricane. I meant mentioning weather control there.
Speaker 2: And Helene, you know, nineteen fifty eight, same cat for
Speaker 2: same bat channel. Interesting and somebody said they named it
Speaker 2: the same I go, well, yeah, because the patent is
Speaker 2: the same. Another source of mine with feet on the ground,
Speaker 2: leading and organizing huge amounts of help to their community.
Speaker 2: And Elk Banner, you know, sorry, And Banner Elk says
Speaker 2: just in Elk River Falls and Lynnville alone, one two
Speaker 2: hundred people are dead. That's a big gap there. It
Speaker 2: says one man. So again these are not confirmed, but
Speaker 2: it says one man pulled twelve hundred bodies out of
Speaker 2: the river. And how does one man pull out twelve
Speaker 2: hundred bodies? First of all, that just sounds weird, But
Speaker 2: we're just gonna read what they said in Marshall and
Speaker 2: bag them himself. Thankfully, Communities and neighbors banding together, banded
Speaker 2: together should be people keep an eye on strangers scoping
Speaker 2: the area. Looting in Nashville is real, knives and guns
Speaker 2: on each other, and it's only day six. And remember
Speaker 2: children and children having to see that devastation, the bodies,
Speaker 2: the potential threat to their own lives or their parents'
Speaker 2: lives because they may have been a little bit more
Speaker 2: prepared than the next person, or they weren't completely obliterated,
Speaker 2: and someone else may have been. So opportunists among them,
Speaker 2: you know, I was just listening to a story by
Speaker 2: my friend. He was telling me about a friend of
Speaker 2: his who lived in wherever the Isletotal Committee had taken
Speaker 2: over at one point, and his dad was like a
Speaker 2: owner of casino. Well, they don't like that in that culture, right,
Speaker 2: they don't like that in that religion. So when the
Speaker 2: committee took power, they took his father out into the
Speaker 2: street and shot him in the head. And then his neighbors,
Speaker 2: his neighbors, neighbors, people that they were friendly with, tried
Speaker 2: to gang rape his mother because they are opportunists. And
Speaker 2: what what do you call it? What? Kevin Wheeler from e.
Speaker 2: Theoria Apafastus always says is that the thinnest layer civilization
Speaker 2: is the thinnest layer of crust atop the biggest, most
Speaker 2: catastrophic volcano conceivable. It only takes a little bit of
Speaker 2: irritation and desperation for people to become complete animals. Not
Speaker 2: everybody would do that, But if you're not able to
Speaker 2: respond and adapt to other people who are, you will
Speaker 2: become their prey. Sman and Noah Road, All buildings are leveled,
Speaker 2: pulling horses, dogs and bodies out of rivers. Marshall, North
Speaker 2: Carolina is gone. People could be heard screaming as floods
Speaker 2: swept house away. There is no land, it's all eroded.
Speaker 2: This one says, God, help us help those trapped in
Speaker 2: North Carolina and East Tennessee. Right now, our government is
Speaker 2: trying to kill them. Their words, government is trying to
Speaker 2: kill them. Help friends, please repost this. Let's get this
Speaker 2: word out now. This needs to go far and why
Speaker 2: to put pressure on the government to do the right
Speaker 2: thing and save lives. This evening from peak pressbody member
Speaker 2: to me, if you okay, let's see sure more. No,
Speaker 2: I guess some one of those things I gotta read
Speaker 2: I can't post this online because it's not quite public yet,
Speaker 2: but government officials had a ton meeting with all of
Speaker 2: the residents in Chimney Rock and basically told them the
Speaker 2: town was being bulldozed bodies and all, and bodies and all,
Speaker 2: and the land was being seized by the federal government.
Speaker 2: They would not be able to move back, and basically
Speaker 2: their homes, the ones that were still standing, were no
Speaker 2: longer theirs and the federal government owned it all. I
Speaker 2: don't know what crazy play for land this is, but
Speaker 2: there's a lot of conspiracy about Lithian minds. And let
Speaker 2: me just tell you as someone who lives in Charlotte
Speaker 2: and as friends who live in the area of western
Speaker 2: North Carolina. I sorry, Anne has friends in western Carolina.
Speaker 2: They are not being helped and this is actually being
Speaker 2: a stand down operation by federal government. Yeah for stopping
Speaker 2: blocking any assistance. Who said, Leahina and what the heck?
Speaker 2: That is quite disturbing. This is firsthand on secondhand or
Speaker 2: more just an info. Our friend owns an airbnb in
Speaker 2: Chimney Rock. They had tom meeting yesterday. Here's another one,
Speaker 2: and someone from the federal government told them that all
Speaker 2: those things in the town meeting, but doesn't want the
Speaker 2: information getting out. Also, they are not picking up the bodies.
Speaker 2: The stense of the bodies everywhere is insane, and for
Speaker 2: some reason the government does not want to pick up
Speaker 2: the bodies. One pastor, because it's a ritual of a
Speaker 2: local church, was going to order uh to door, was
Speaker 2: going to order to door delivering I don't know what
Speaker 2: what was going to order to door, but going door
Speaker 2: to door is why. I believe it's what that supposed
Speaker 2: to say. But it's again people don't look at their
Speaker 2: voice texting. Was going to door to door delivering water,
Speaker 2: and they changed their delivery request to body bags because
Speaker 2: so many of the homes that they've gone to have
Speaker 2: needed body bags. We're trying, we're trying to keep the
Speaker 2: we're trying to keep the body count. See again, fucking
Speaker 2: use grammar. They're not picking up the bodies. They don't want,
Speaker 2: they don't want to identify the bodies, and they're just
Speaker 2: leaving them to rot in the streets. So you can
Speaker 2: post it in the message and needs to get out.
Speaker 2: Something civil is going on. Something evil, sorry, something evil
Speaker 2: is going on in the North Carolina Mountains. I just
Speaker 2: didn't want to be identified. Just today we filled up
Speaker 2: a trailer full for a shelter in hurt Hendersonville that
Speaker 2: had no food for tons of moms and babies. All
Speaker 2: the stores around are empty or locked. In Chandler, two
Speaker 2: thousand people haven't eaten anything or drank in six days
Speaker 2: and just get an SOS message out for help. I'm
Speaker 2: trying to tag the Cajun Navy and Operation Air Drop,
Speaker 2: but people are dying by the minute. Multiple truckers have
Speaker 2: reported having their tires slashed. Our friends from Chimney Rock
Speaker 2: so they have heard multiple stories of people being robbed
Speaker 2: at gunpoint making suppli runs. Two people that drove down
Speaker 2: to Charlotte yesterday and today one that helped said bodies
Speaker 2: and trees all over ditches in major road, packs in
Speaker 2: major roads back. Something weird is going on here them again.
Speaker 2: Someone with a large national megaphone needs to amplify how
Speaker 2: bad it is. People are now staring, sorry, starting to
Speaker 2: die trapped. My town is Operation Airdrop in North Carolina
Speaker 2: Central Command. They need pilots with planes and now are
Speaker 2: asking just for trucks. People with big equipment are needed.
Speaker 2: But more than anything, the nation needs to be needs
Speaker 2: to put pressure on Washington to deploy the National Guard. Yeah,
Speaker 2: why was female there first? The eighty second was begging
Speaker 2: to go since Saturday, but has been told to stand down.
Speaker 2: Every fucking apache we have should be flying rescue missions.
Speaker 2: Please amplify the message.
Speaker 1: Let's give me a headache. It's blurry.
Speaker 2: So there's that, all right. And also, once FEMA is involved,
Speaker 2: constitution not that we have one anyway, because we don't
Speaker 2: enforce it ourselves, but constitutional protections are out the door.
Speaker 2: They don't they're all suspended. FEMA is not something that
Speaker 2: should have been Hey, it hasn't been five years since
Speaker 2: they activated them for COVID though, so in reality it's there.
Speaker 2: They're basically just have been in control for the last
Speaker 2: four years. As long as we don't know about it,
Speaker 2: they can do whatever they want, right, It's always about
Speaker 2: whatever the public thinks is reality is reality. Therefore they
Speaker 2: can do whatever they want because people aren't paying attention.
Speaker 2: So this one is local authorities spread into arrest volunteer
Speaker 2: saving hurricane victims. Rescuer explains by fed's reject help North Carolina.
Speaker 2: Jordan Sidehon, a former head narcotics detective the current volunteer
Speaker 2: firefighter in helicopter. Pirate has his own helicopter and was
Speaker 2: rescuing people who were stranded due to Hurricane Heleen HH
Speaker 2: eight eight. His rescue efforts So, by the way, remember
Speaker 2: do you remember Lehina happened on eight to eight Lionsgate
Speaker 2: eight eight. Their area code is eight to eight, right, yep, yeah,
Speaker 2: and that was what year were they here? Let's let's
Speaker 2: take a look one with Lehina established. Oh you know what,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, eighteen twenty. But when was the area code? Oh?
Speaker 2: What the fuck?
Speaker 1: I just do.
Speaker 2: First, I'll show you that it is eight away. Okay.
Speaker 2: THEHYA is a sense a bit that well tell me
Speaker 2: without me having to go. Yeah, No, eight away covers
Speaker 2: the entire state of Hawaii, and it happened on eight eight,
Speaker 2: and h H is eight eight in the nineteen fifty eight,
Speaker 2: which I believe is the same year that Lahina had
Speaker 2: that we know that area code was implemented. I believe
Speaker 2: it's a syre in nineteen fifty eight, coincidental matrix math
Speaker 2: or something different, some kind of ritual play, some symbology here.
Speaker 2: I don't know. His rescue efforts he was providing at
Speaker 2: his own expense, were allegedly thwarted by the local Lake
Speaker 2: Lure fire chief. So fire chief got in the way
Speaker 2: or assistant chief by threatening to arrest the pilot Ryan Tyre. Oh,
Speaker 2: that's interesting too, like King of t or tire Right,
Speaker 2: the one who uh what do you call it? What
Speaker 2: they say commissioned the fake Solomon to create the fake
Speaker 2: temple that never existed. But that's the that's the biblical
Speaker 2: name there at tire Right, because the King of Tire,
Speaker 2: a man who claims to have helped it in disaster
Speaker 2: situations for a decade, posted an explanation on next about
Speaker 2: why citizens are turned away from helping and it takes
Speaker 2: so long for the federal government to take action. He's
Speaker 2: told a story about working to help people and provide
Speaker 2: supplies to people in Florida following Hurricane Irma, but they
Speaker 2: were turned away by authorities because their provisions were not
Speaker 2: on the preferred vendors list. Vendors, they're giving shit away
Speaker 2: And this is all about it's all about commerce, and
Speaker 2: it's all about cooporate, and it was all about money.
Speaker 2: So I just got done saying this claim has not
Speaker 2: been verified, but he included photos and other evidence. And
Speaker 2: there's a father and son helicopter began rescuing people stranded
Speaker 2: from Hurricane Helen. The government came and threatened him with
Speaker 2: the rest your government is incompetent and capable of It's
Speaker 2: not incompetent. They're delivery trying to kill it people. There's
Speaker 2: a big difference there.
Speaker 3: Stories of survival are now being shared days after Helene
Speaker 3: wreaked havoc in North Carolina, but one Pageland man's efforts
Speaker 3: to help are now the source of controversy. He flew
Speaker 3: his own chopper on his own dime to help stranded.
Speaker 2: Can you hear it? Well, I'm not gonna be able
Speaker 2: to know if you can't know, because I have a
Speaker 2: different stare screen now, so I can't look back at it,
Speaker 2: but hopefully you can. Hopefully I click the right buttons.
Speaker 3: Simms. But that man says he abandoned his rescue missions
Speaker 3: after a fire official threatened to have him thrown in jail. Well,
Speaker 3: that man now wants answers and turn the Queen City
Speaker 3: News Chief investigator Jody Barr.
Speaker 2: So, the guy who chose to see you again, this
Speaker 2: little tiny thread of authority, he decided to stop trying
Speaker 2: to save lives. I would have told I got to
Speaker 2: go fuck himself and punched him in the face and
Speaker 2: kept on going. You know, I mean, if there's enough
Speaker 2: community people there, who the hell, what the hell is
Speaker 2: that guy gonna do? He's gonna get swarmed by angry citizens.
Speaker 2: That police chief, if he I mean that fire chief,
Speaker 2: fire chief, fire chief's I'm gonna call the cops. Fuck you.
Speaker 2: I think they're a little busy right now, you know, petty,
Speaker 2: very very strange, very odd, especially since this guy has
Speaker 2: a background in law enforcement and all this other stuff.
Speaker 2: That he's a pilot himself, and he's not taking resources
Speaker 2: from something else, it's his own resources. None of that
Speaker 2: makes any sense.
Speaker 3: Help figure out what went wrong here.
Speaker 2: This is let's see the spin. Let's see the spin
Speaker 2: that they that they try to excuse this for or with.
Speaker 4: The original post that I was reading when I decided
Speaker 4: to go up and help.
Speaker 2: This a long post, but she's saying that.
Speaker 4: Her kids and family and animals are trapped, no way out,
Speaker 4: no supplies, and the only way in or out is
Speaker 4: accessible by helicopter, limited silk service, and no water. Since
Speaker 4: Friday morning, I thought I have a helicopter and maybe
Speaker 4: I can help.
Speaker 5: Jordan Sidham piled food and water into its helicopter Saturday
Speaker 5: and headed up toward Better Elk. The only way through
Speaker 5: a mountain gap in Lake Lore.
Speaker 4: This is the mountain valley that you would have to
Speaker 4: fly to to get to Black Mountain where we were
Speaker 4: escorting people out. This is a mountain range. And this
Speaker 4: is a mountain range. The only place to fly through
Speaker 4: with bad visibility low cloud coverage is Lake Loure.
Speaker 5: The christ for help from people stranded without food, water
Speaker 5: or electricity hit social media soon after the flooding last Friday.
Speaker 6: So my parents are their addresses by are out.
Speaker 7: They are in the first condo.
Speaker 2: If you received this, thanks give me a call back.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 5: Siddem's phone started lighting up on Saturday with people begging
Speaker 5: for help.
Speaker 2: Man. I can hear the desperation in her voice.
Speaker 4: And this is multiple phone calls I received like this, voicemails,
Speaker 4: text messages, and.
Speaker 2: You could hear people desperate for help.
Speaker 5: Cinnamon, his son, rescued four people on Saturday and spent
Speaker 5: the night in a nearby pilot's lounge, then decided to
Speaker 5: fly again Sunday morning.
Speaker 4: I spoke with my son, which is my co pilot.
Speaker 4: I said, hey, you want to go back out and try.
Speaker 1: To help today.
Speaker 4: And his response was, there's so many messages.
Speaker 2: I don't think we can't not.
Speaker 5: Go help Cinnamon and Sun. We're headed up the Black Mountain.
Speaker 5: Flight tracking shows no flight restrictions in place Saturday or
Speaker 5: Sunday morning when Sydam flew through the Lake Loud Gap,
Speaker 5: but that was all about to change. The sytem spotted
Speaker 5: in older couple waiting for help then landed and what's
Speaker 5: left or their driveway. Hey, I want you to oh, let.
Speaker 6: Me get in.
Speaker 4: You step out and go out, help her in, put
Speaker 4: her bag into bat get her strapped in.
Speaker 6: I'm gonna take her down, go back and I'll take him.
Speaker 6: I'll go back and then i'll get you.
Speaker 4: I originally left my son co pilot on the side
Speaker 4: of the mountain.
Speaker 2: It was it was.
Speaker 4: Kind of unstable, so I didn't want to put more
Speaker 4: weight in the helicopter to lift back off. So I
Speaker 4: left my son with the other victim and I was
Speaker 4: just gonna take one person down at the time. And
Speaker 4: you could hear me in the video talking through with
Speaker 4: the victims and with my son what we're gonna do.
Speaker 5: Three minutes away, Sytems spotted a group of rescuers just
Speaker 5: down the river. He landed and found someone in charge.
Speaker 4: Told him my background experienced law enforcement, firefight a pilot.
Speaker 2: He immediately started helping with coordination.
Speaker 4: He gave me radio frequencies to coordinate with them on,
Speaker 4: set up a landing area for me to come back
Speaker 4: with the other victim, and in the middle of the
Speaker 4: whole conversation.
Speaker 1: And then blocking the road off, I was greeted.
Speaker 4: By the at that time I didn't know but Lake
Speaker 4: Lure fire chief or assistant chief maybe, and he shut
Speaker 4: down the whole operation. So at that point there was
Speaker 4: I felt like the conversation wasn't going any further, and
Speaker 4: again he asked me to leave, and I said, hey,
Speaker 4: I have no problem getting out of your area.
Speaker 1: If that's what you want us to do, we'll leave
Speaker 1: no issue.
Speaker 4: At that point, I asked him, you know what was
Speaker 4: the reason I had to leave them there? And he said, again,
Speaker 4: you're interfering with my operation. I just need you to
Speaker 4: get out of the area. I said, sir, I don't
Speaker 4: know where you were trained at, but I know how
Speaker 4: my training is and I'm not going to leave personnel behind.
Speaker 4: I'm going back to get my copilot He said, if
Speaker 4: you turn around and go back up the mountain, you're
Speaker 4: going to be arrested. I said, well, sir, I'm going
Speaker 4: back to get my copilot. I don't know what to
Speaker 4: tell you, and he said, I'm letting you know. And
Speaker 4: at that point he waited for two law enforcement officers
Speaker 4: to come over and told me that again, if I
Speaker 4: go back up the mountain, I will be arrested.
Speaker 5: He flew the three minute trip back, picked up his son,
Speaker 5: and left the woman's husband behind.
Speaker 4: I'm sure he was flooded with emotions and trying to
Speaker 4: rescue it, so he.
Speaker 2: Left the women's husband behind. What a piece of shit.
Speaker 2: Why wouldn't you just keep going ignore it? If it's
Speaker 2: not a lawful order, you just keep going. You're in
Speaker 2: the right. It doesn't matter what happens to you. You
Speaker 2: do the right thing. Oh yeah, Doctor Manzo is on
Speaker 2: the scene called godcast and Freedom Healthcare. It's a part
Speaker 2: of the Azure. Well, so they talk about the products
Speaker 2: and stuff like that. I had that up there because
Speaker 2: I'm wanting to watch it. And actually doctor Monzo is featured,
Speaker 2: says the science behind hands on healing that can save lives.
Speaker 2: He's going to be at the Tulsa, Oklahoma Red Pill
Speaker 2: and there's a video here. I'm not sure it's only
Speaker 2: three minutes long, but there you have it. Look, that's
Speaker 2: a rail Raymond Rife. All right, I can so on
Speaker 2: that one going good over here?
Speaker 1: Right right?
Speaker 2: Okay, So all that being said, there's also some other
Speaker 2: this fucking internet. I don't want to look in the
Speaker 2: corner because he keeps telling me that I'm falling out.
Speaker 2: All right. There's some talk that there's another there's a
Speaker 2: city of upon a city, and there's one that's buried,
Speaker 2: and there might be some things. Some tunnels, the ties
Speaker 2: into the Vanderbilts, and that's you know, Anderson Cooper's family.
Speaker 2: Could have been for child trafficking, could have been for anything.
Speaker 2: But apparently there's an aground tunnel system in the same area,
Speaker 2: and potentially the reason why they don't anybody in there
Speaker 2: is because if it got washed out and it could
Speaker 2: see these things, then it would be exposed. I don't
Speaker 2: know how true that is, but I think it was
Speaker 2: mind Unveiled that may have made a post on that.
Speaker 2: I'm going to see if I can. I don't know.
Speaker 2: There was a write up and then the video we
Speaker 2: don't have to actually watch the video, but look look
Speaker 2: for that mindn't veiled. It is on YouTube and sometimes
Speaker 2: there's stuff is a little on the hokey side, but
Speaker 2: it could potentially be true. I mean the I don't
Speaker 2: want to know where I read it from, because it
Speaker 2: was allegedly the great, the biggest mansion in the United States.
Speaker 2: It was a Vanderbilt mansion in this area in North Carolina,
Speaker 2: and under that there was potentially a huge tunnel system
Speaker 2: and maybe some secrets to be found there, and if
Speaker 2: it got exposed, then could be a potential reason. But
Speaker 2: if they did the same thing in Florida, then that
Speaker 2: wouldn't been the same reason unless there's tunnels everywhere, which
Speaker 2: they probably are. But in Florida you would drowned if
Speaker 2: you dug a tunnel because you're under the sea level.
Speaker 2: Let's see what else we got, all right, So we're
Speaker 2: going to get into this now. I'm going to introduce
Speaker 2: the topic this way, but it's a soft introduction, Okay.
Speaker 2: Then we're going to get into the more nitty gritty
Speaker 2: talk about the free Masonic and Francist and Jesuit steering
Speaker 2: of our belief in the science that they present to
Speaker 2: us and how that is going to create the backstory
Speaker 2: and explain why they would take past yours absolute pseudoscience
Speaker 2: germ theory, virus theory and run with that versus base
Speaker 2: Shop ant plunge base Shop. And we're gonna read a
Speaker 2: lot of the fucking Internet. What is going on? Internet?
Speaker 2: God damn it. So sick of this shit. Please if
Speaker 2: you can, because I'm at mercy of this thing. I
Speaker 2: can't do anything about this horrible Internet connection that keeps
Speaker 2: on trying to kill itself. It's nine thirty three in
Speaker 2: the morning, people are at work. There's no reason why
Speaker 2: this should be doing this. It's not overloaded. It's just
Speaker 2: absolute bullshit all the time. And I can't use the
Speaker 2: other Internet because this bios is destroyed because of a
Speaker 2: hack or some other intentional, deliberate Microsoft disruption of my computer.
Speaker 2: That's why we got to get rid of this thing.
Speaker 2: That's why we got to get the new computer so
Speaker 2: that I can utilize whatever Internet service I want. But
Speaker 2: right now it doesn't even allow me get into the settings,
Speaker 2: so I can't put a password in there, so I
Speaker 2: can't plug in anything else because it would be no
Speaker 2: password to it. So therefore I'm stuck. I'm using Centrill
Speaker 2: because that was what was already on there before the
Speaker 2: bios hack. So that's BAH plus the things falling apart
Speaker 2: too ten years later, right, I mean almost ten years.
Speaker 2: It makes it so it's like it's distracting me from
Speaker 2: doing what I need to do here because I keep
Speaker 2: seeing it needling out unstable, unstable, unstable.
Speaker 1: Then I.
Speaker 2: It's enough to make me. I just fucking clat it out,
Speaker 2: you know what. Let me see if I can do
Speaker 2: something here. If I'm on Century Link here, I gotta
Speaker 2: get it. No, I'm not on Spectrum, and every little
Speaker 2: bit helps. I would just take down everything that's connected.
Speaker 2: Let's see, let's try this one here. I want you
Speaker 2: to see a little bit of this, and then we're
Speaker 2: gonna we're going to branch off from here. Okay, so
Speaker 2: let's I'm gonna be doing some reading. This is gonna
Speaker 2: be a series because I want to read as much
Speaker 2: of this that I don't know if other people will
Speaker 2: take the initiative to go out and seek for themselves.
Speaker 2: But the information is so vital to cracking the crust
Speaker 2: around our brains of this trust that we have in
Speaker 2: situation in systems, and in health, and it illustrates just
Speaker 2: how important with doctor Peter Glidden talks about I'm still
Speaker 2: obsessed by staring at that thing. Ah, I'm gonna I'm
Speaker 2: not you know, I'm gonna tell you this right now.
Speaker 2: If if this is a continual thing that continues happened,
Speaker 2: there will be probably very little episodes ever again until
Speaker 2: like it, until something happens with the computer thing, because
Speaker 2: I can't it strives me nuts. All right, here we go,
Speaker 2: let me myself out of the way. I'll put me
Speaker 2: here for now. So she speaks Russian, so it's dubbed
Speaker 2: all right, and doctor Ilanka speaks German and English. But
Speaker 2: he was doing the next clip that I'm gonna show
Speaker 2: you after this, a video that I had shared almost
Speaker 2: two years ago, is going to be Steve Falconer. I'm
Speaker 2: not gonna show you a clip of the important part.
Speaker 2: And because he talks about Vikao, and that's an important
Speaker 2: element because he was a Freemason, right and after seventeen
Speaker 2: eighties freemasonry completely changed its nature and was pushing a subversive, Frankist,
Speaker 2: anti human agenda, riling people up under that you know,
Speaker 2: fraternity blah blah blah. This is all Illuminati stuff, right,
Speaker 2: and it ties right into the protocols. Protocols may as
Speaker 2: well have been the freaking fram Masonic Meeting because it's
Speaker 2: literally almost the same thing, right, and they're frankests. So
Speaker 2: let's play.
Speaker 7: Hello, dear friends. Today we will talk about a very
Speaker 7: important historical event. Thanks to the microbiologist Stefan Lanka on
Speaker 7: April twenty first, twenty twenty one, we've got an irrefutable
Speaker 7: proof that virology is not based on scientific methods. Now,
Speaker 7: I will introduce you to this and give you an
Speaker 7: important context that will help you understand the topic. If
Speaker 7: you are a virologist and you want to prove the
Speaker 7: existence of a virus and its corp relationship to a disease,
Speaker 7: you have to do three very simple things. One isolate,
Speaker 7: in other words, extract the virus from a sick person
Speaker 7: and purify it so you have an isolate consisting only
Speaker 7: of pure viral particles and nothing else. Two visualize this
Speaker 7: virus under a microscope, take a photo, characterize it as
Speaker 7: a unique biochemical structure, sequence its gene, and determine which
Speaker 7: protein it is made of. Three, transfer the purify virus
Speaker 7: into an experimental host and cause disease. If you follow
Speaker 7: these steps successfully, only then can you prove that virus
Speaker 7: exists and causes disease. This is what Chinese virologists should
Speaker 7: have done with the first so called COVID patients in
Speaker 7: Wuhem to be able to claim that their respiratory conditions
Speaker 7: are caused by a virus. People often ask me, doesn't
Speaker 7: the fact that a certain number of people in Wuhan
Speaker 7: got sick at the same time prove the existence of
Speaker 7: the virus. Let's clarify this point. When we see that
Speaker 7: a certain number of people fall ill at the same time,
Speaker 7: we are making epidemiological observations. Epidemiology does not prove the
Speaker 7: existence of anything, nor does it claim a specific cause
Speaker 7: for these conditions. The rule of epidemiological observation is to
Speaker 7: record that the fact people exhibit certain symptoms, and epidemiologists
Speaker 7: can also propose hypotheses that need to be tested to
Speaker 7: understand the cause of these conditions. Epidemiology is not proving
Speaker 7: or asserting anything. Determining the cause of these conditions occurs
Speaker 7: after epidemiological studies have taken place and we understand that
Speaker 7: something is happening and people start to show symptoms. If
Speaker 7: you think that the fact that people get sick at
Speaker 7: the same time automatically proves the existence of a virus,
Speaker 7: then you think that scurvy is caused by a virus,
Speaker 7: after all sailors began to fall ill with the same
Speaker 7: symptoms simultaneously or one after another. Therefore, for a very
Speaker 7: long time, it was believed that scurvy is a contagious,
Speaker 7: infectious disease, and all those who offered alternative explanations were ridiculed.
Speaker 7: Same about conditions such as barry berry and pelagra, which
Speaker 7: were considered infectious diseases when in reality they were a
Speaker 7: consequence of nutritional deficiencies. And these are not the only examples.
Speaker 7: And if you think that the fact that disease is
Speaker 7: spreading and people in other regions begin to show the
Speaker 7: same symptoms automatically proves that the cause of this is
Speaker 7: a virus, then you should think that Chernobyl was not
Speaker 7: an accident at a new clear power station, but a virus.
Speaker 7: Any scientist or competent physician would agree that epidemiological observations
Speaker 7: alone do not prove the existence of a virus. Whether
Speaker 7: it is a virus or not remains to be seen.
Speaker 7: Honest researchers understand that these respiratory diseases are caused by
Speaker 7: various factors, for example, chemicals, air pollution, toxic lifestyles, and
Speaker 7: many other factors. Just have a look at a huge
Speaker 7: amount of scientific literature about drug induced pneumonia. There are
Speaker 7: over six hundred known drugs that induce pneumonia, and this
Speaker 7: list includes many common drugs such as paracetamol, antibiotics, statins,
Speaker 7: and even aspirin. In reality, we can sit here all
Speaker 7: day and discuss the factors that can lead to respiratory illness. Therefore,
Speaker 7: if your goal is to determine the real factor that
Speaker 7: caused the disease in a person, and not just to
Speaker 7: impose something that is convenient only for you, then you
Speaker 7: will impartially investigate all possible causes and will not hold
Speaker 7: onto something untenable. When it comes to a virus, you
Speaker 7: must follow all these steps to check if it is
Speaker 7: the cause of the disease and what do you think?
Speaker 7: Have these steps been ever taken in the entire one
Speaker 7: and a half year old story named COVID nineteen, not
Speaker 7: a single time, despite the fact that there are a
Speaker 7: huge number of publications, the title of which claims that
Speaker 7: the TSARS cove II virus was isolated. In fact, this
Speaker 7: was never done. The procedure of isolation is very simple
Speaker 7: and has been successfully used in microbiology, and it allows
Speaker 7: you to get a viral particles cleared of all foreign matter.
Speaker 7: That is a pure sample of a virus or something
Speaker 7: else that you want to study. For this, the patient's
Speaker 7: lung fluid is taken passed through special filters to get
Speaker 7: rid of all large molecules and get a filtrate consisting
Speaker 7: of molocus measured in nanometers. Then, using a density gradient centrifuge,
Speaker 7: this filtrate is splent to separate all the different tiny
Speaker 7: molecules that are in the filtrate by density and by weight.
Speaker 7: This creates several bands of molecules and all the molecules
Speaker 7: with the same weight and density will end up in
Speaker 7: the same band, so if the viral particles are present,
Speaker 7: they will be in one of these bands. After this,
Speaker 7: you can take these particles and study them to determine
Speaker 7: their genome, proteins and test them for pathogenicity. This is
Speaker 7: how you isolate a virus. It is important to understand
Speaker 7: that if you have not performed these procedures, you do
Speaker 7: not have a sample of the virus, and further steps
Speaker 7: such as proving a causal relationship to the disease, creating
Speaker 7: a diagnostic test and a vaccine are simply not possible.
Speaker 7: As I said in virility, this procedure has never been done.
Speaker 7: Virologists are the only scientists in the world who have
Speaker 7: decided not to rely on the dictionary definition of a
Speaker 7: word isol and therefore their methods for isolation of a
Speaker 7: virus have nothing to do with the general definition of
Speaker 7: this word. In virology, to isolate a virus means not
Speaker 7: to extract this virus from the body of a sick patient,
Speaker 7: but to perform a so called cell culture. They take
Speaker 7: samples of lung fluid, from which they do not isolate
Speaker 7: the virus, so they have no idea if it is
Speaker 7: present at all in the sample. They put it on
Speaker 7: vero cells monkey kidney cells and add large amounts of
Speaker 7: antibiotics and antifungals. They also severely restrict the cell's nutrition,
Speaker 7: causing them to starve. Then they observe a cytopathic effect,
Speaker 7: which is death of cells, and claim that this proves
Speaker 7: the presence of the virus in a sample and its pathogenicity. However,
Speaker 7: antibiotics and antifungal drugs that they add to the starving
Speaker 7: cells are powerful cyto and nephrotoxins. So what in reality
Speaker 7: killed the cells these toxic drug and hunger or hypothetical virlrus.
Speaker 7: The answer to this question could be provided by control experience,
Speaker 7: in which virologists would take non infectious material, for example,
Speaker 7: sputum from a healthy person for sterile solution or even nothing,
Speaker 7: but use the same conditions, meaning the same high amounts
Speaker 7: of antibiotics, reduce nutrition, and show that the cytopathic effect
Speaker 7: did not happen. Then it will be one hundred percent
Speaker 7: clear that these drugs and hunger could not cause cell death.
Speaker 7: Now do you think that in at least one publication
Speaker 7: on the so called isolation of the Tsar's cove to,
Speaker 7: such a control experiment was ever conducted. The answer to
Speaker 7: this question is no, not even once has such an
Speaker 7: experiment been carried out at least once in the entire
Speaker 7: history of virology. No, not with any so called pathogenic virus.
Speaker 7: Not only that, in virology, isolation means not to obtain
Speaker 7: a sample of the virus, but to perform a tissue culture,
Speaker 7: which has nothing to do with isolation. They also never
Speaker 7: do the control, which in science is simply unacceptable. Why
Speaker 7: the control experiments are never done in virology because they
Speaker 7: will entail result that will lead to the disappearance of virology.
Speaker 7: John Enders, the man who came up with this fraudulent
Speaker 7: procedure that virologists called isolation today, once conducted a control
Speaker 7: experiment which has been ignored by everyone. In his publication
Speaker 7: from nineteen fifty four entitled Propagation in Tissue Cultures of
Speaker 7: cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles or he first described
Speaker 7: the results of tissue culture. He says, quote, a second
Speaker 7: agent was obtained from an uninoculated culture of monkey kidney cells.
Speaker 7: The cytopathic changes it induced, and the unstained preparations could
Speaker 7: not be distinguished with confidence from the viruses isolated from measles.
Speaker 7: This is a very important quote, and I will read
Speaker 7: it again. And the agent was obtained from an anena.
Speaker 2: Okay, well that just happened, and it's gonna keep happening.
Speaker 2: Are you guys still there? Let me take a look.
Speaker 2: I got knocked off. Let me see.
Speaker 1: What the hell?
Speaker 2: Wow, the connection is terrible. All right, you're still there.
Speaker 2: But the grainy as hell and this is not acceptable.
Speaker 2: The way's gonna watch this afterwards. I'm crystal clear here,
Speaker 2: but yet now it's popping back up a little Okay,
Speaker 2: well that's not gonna be stable and uh okay, but
Speaker 2: let's try this again. I just backed up the video
Speaker 2: a little bit, so I'll continue. And here we are.
Speaker 2: What a fucking shit show. This is not my show,
Speaker 2: this situation. I'm at the mercy of this. There it is.
Speaker 2: It's dropping again. I am freaking furious right now. Okay, well,
Speaker 2: all right, let's let me let me dick with this
Speaker 2: while you guys try to watch this and I'll try
Speaker 2: to keep an eye on what's going on here. Oh
Speaker 2: my god, I have no connection.
Speaker 1: It's bad.
Speaker 2: And keeps failing. Sorry, I didn't say sorry to you,
Speaker 2: the fucking piece of shit or anyway.
Speaker 7: Playing called infectious material with a virus inside. This is
Speaker 7: a direct evidence that the cytopathic effect is not caused
Speaker 7: by any virus, but by toxic conditions of the experiment itself.
Speaker 7: What happens next. It happens that during cellular decay, cells
Speaker 7: release a huge amount of different particles that contain genetic materials.
Speaker 7: They come from decaying monkey kidney cells, human lung fluid
Speaker 7: as well as from fetal calf serum that they always
Speaker 7: add to the tissue culture. And there's also added cow's
Speaker 7: milk there, So we have several sources of genetic material.
Speaker 7: Monkey cells, human lung fluid, fetal calf blood serum, and milk.
Speaker 7: All these things contain genetic material. So during decay of
Speaker 7: all them will produce particles extracellular vesicles with nucleic acids inside.
Speaker 7: But the appearance of these particles is announced as proof
Speaker 7: that the virus has multiplied. Virologists look at these particles
Speaker 7: in a microscope, choose the ones that they think have
Speaker 7: better appearance, take a photo, and call them Sar's cove
Speaker 7: to virus. They never isolate these particles, They simply look
Speaker 7: at them with a microscope and photograph them. There is
Speaker 7: no evidence that these particles are any kind of virus.
Speaker 7: As I said, they can be common decay products of
Speaker 7: all materials involved in the experiment. For example, what is
Speaker 7: called SARS cove two virus in the photographs is the
Speaker 7: exact copy of exosomes particles produced by human cells that
Speaker 7: are not pathogenic. There is no evidence that these photographs
Speaker 7: show virus and not exosome. See what Enders wrote about
Speaker 7: this in his publication from nineteen fifty seven titled Measles Virus,
Speaker 7: A Summary of Experiments concerned with isolation properties and behavior. Ruckle,
Speaker 7: that is, another scientist has lately reported similar findings. An addition,
Speaker 7: has isolated an agent from monkey kidney tissue that so
Speaker 7: far is indistinguishable from human measle virus. The problem, however,
Speaker 7: of the origin of the agent responsible has not yet
Speaker 7: been solved. Here Enders says that they do not know
Speaker 7: whether these particles obtained as a result of the cytopathic
Speaker 7: effect are viruses or just products of cell decay. Another
Speaker 7: quote in the same publication, there is a potential risk
Speaker 7: in employing cultures of primate cells for the production of
Speaker 7: vaccines composed of attenuated virus, since the presence of other agents,
Speaker 7: possibly latent, in primate tissues cannot be definitely excluded by
Speaker 7: any known method. What does this mean? This means absolutely
Speaker 7: the same thing that modern researchers said in twenty twenty.
Speaker 7: There is a quote from a publication from a journal
Speaker 7: titled Viruses from twenty twenty where they look at extracellular
Speaker 7: vesicles in relation to what they call the HIVS, STARS,
Speaker 7: and hepatitis C. Nowadays, it is an almost impossible mission
Speaker 7: to separate evs and viruses by means of canonical vesical
Speaker 7: isolation methods such as differential ultracentrification, because they are frequently
Speaker 7: copellated due to their similar dimension. To overcome this problem,
Speaker 7: different studies have proposed the separation of evs from virus
Speaker 7: particles by exploiting their different migration velocity in a density
Speaker 7: gradient or using the presence of specific markers that distinguish
Speaker 7: viruses from evs. However, to date, a reliable method that
Speaker 7: can actually guarantee a complete separation does not exist. This
Speaker 7: quote means that the so called viruses and extracellular vesicles
Speaker 7: are so much identical that you cannot even distinguish or
Speaker 7: separate them from each other. This is simply not possible. Therefore,
Speaker 7: what grounds are there for asserting that you are looking
Speaker 7: at a virus and not an ex zomes or other
Speaker 7: cellular decay product after a cytopathic effect. Absolutely none. If
Speaker 7: you conducted control experiments and also isolated these particles and
Speaker 7: proved their pathogenicity, we could say that this is a virus,
Speaker 7: but virologists never do it. In the nineteen fifties, constrol
Speaker 7: experiment made by Enders was ignored by everyone, including Enders himself,
Speaker 7: and this procedure has become a standard procedure in virology
Speaker 7: and the only proof of the existence of viruses. I
Speaker 7: want to emphasize that this procedure is not just one
Speaker 7: of the ways in which virologists prove the existence of
Speaker 7: a virus. This is the only way. Since then, no
Speaker 7: one has conducted any control experiments. But now the end
Speaker 7: has come to this scientific fraud and we are on
Speaker 7: the verge of a real scientific revolution. On April twenty first,
Speaker 7: twenty twenty one, Stefan Lanka, a German microbiologist, did something
Speaker 7: that no other scientist has done since John Enders. Steffan
Speaker 7: Lanka performed control experiments. What results do you think he got?
Speaker 7: The same as John Enders? Exactly the same cytopathic effect
Speaker 7: occurred in cell culture without any infectious material added, but
Speaker 7: with the same conditions such as high doses of antibiotics
Speaker 7: and decreased nutrition. Let's take a closer look at these experiments.
Speaker 7: So here are the images of the control experiments that
Speaker 7: Stefan Lanka did, and now I will explain everything to
Speaker 7: you as you can see four cell lines are used here.
Speaker 7: The very first line serves as a control The other
Speaker 7: three are the lines with which the experiment is being
Speaker 7: carried out. Here at the top we can see what
Speaker 7: these three experimental cell lines looked like before the start
Speaker 7: of the experiment, and as you can see, they look
Speaker 7: very healthy. So let's move on to the top control group.
Speaker 7: Here it says control number one CM is a culture
Speaker 7: medium that is complete normal cell nutrition and one dose
Speaker 7: of ABAM, which means antibiotics antimycotics. To be specific, the
Speaker 7: drug called amphotericin is used here because it was the
Speaker 7: drug that was used in all sars Cove two isolation studies. Further,
Speaker 7: it says here one day stress and five days after stress,
Speaker 7: stress refers to a change in the nutrient medium. As
Speaker 7: you can see, the cell line that from the very
Speaker 7: first day received good nutrition and a small dose of
Speaker 7: antibiotics remained healthy on the fifth day of the experiment.
Speaker 7: We do not observe any cytopathic effect or cell death.
Speaker 7: Let's move on to the next group. What we are
Speaker 7: seeing now is closer to what virologists are doing in
Speaker 7: their experiments, but not completely. A different kind of culture
Speaker 7: medium is used here d MEM, which stands for Dullbeco's
Speaker 7: Modified Eagles medium. This medium differs from the standard culture
Speaker 7: medium because it has reduced nutrient concentrations. Then ten percent
Speaker 7: FCS is used, which is fetal cafe serum. It is
Speaker 7: used to add extra nutrition because d MEM is not
Speaker 7: enough for cells to survive, and so far the same
Speaker 7: dose of amphotericin is used. We see that these changes
Speaker 7: in the nutrient medium led to serious changes in the
Speaker 7: cell culture. It is not as healthy as the first one.
Speaker 7: We see that the cells have lost their shape. They
Speaker 7: are not as uniform as in the first picture. If
Speaker 7: we look at the third image, we see exactly what
Speaker 7: virologists are doing with cell ca. Here the concentration of
Speaker 7: nutrients was further decreased, approximately in half. Then the concentration
Speaker 7: of fetal calf serum was reduced from ten percent to
Speaker 7: one percent. In addition, the dose of antibiotics was increased
Speaker 7: from one to three and here we can see very
Speaker 7: clearly how cells degrade and break down. They were healthy,
Speaker 7: but a few days after changing the nutrient medium and
Speaker 7: using such a high dose of amphoteraesin, they begin to
Speaker 7: look abnormal, and after five days we observe a serious
Speaker 7: cytopathic effect. And all this happens without the use of
Speaker 7: any infectious material only due to the conditions in which
Speaker 7: these cells were placed. The last group was used for
Speaker 7: further control experiments for the so called.
Speaker 2: Genomic Sorry, but I just had to have it. Don't
Speaker 2: if you have century Link, don't ever, don't get rid
Speaker 2: of it, don't use it because they're arguing they had
Speaker 2: a problem that they told me that they had, and
Speaker 2: then they pretended that they fix it remotely last week
Speaker 2: and they asked me to cancel the service call. So
Speaker 2: I did because I was at my daughter's at gymnastics,
Speaker 2: and I was like, all right, fine, if it's fixed,
Speaker 2: it's fixed whatever. I'll have to test it. And now
Speaker 2: it's not obviously working. And they're telling me that it's
Speaker 2: my problem, that it's my fault that there's things there's
Speaker 2: nothing else on in the house. I'm the only person
Speaker 2: in the house, and they're telling me there's too many signatures,
Speaker 2: the awings overloaded. I'm like, no, that's not true. And
Speaker 2: if you can't have things connected to it, what the
Speaker 2: hell is the point of having the service. This is
Speaker 2: hard line from the modem to my computer. There's no
Speaker 2: reason why this should be happening, and they're being snotty
Speaker 2: with me. It's like nopid isn't obviously if there's still
Speaker 2: a problem, I'm like, you're the ones who told me
Speaker 2: he fixed it. So finally I ended up having to
Speaker 2: tell her that she's being a fucking bitch and just
Speaker 2: connect that and I'll find someone better later to talk to. Anyway,
Speaker 2: moving on, and we have no service. Really it's going
Speaker 2: to drop again. I can tell you right now.
Speaker 7: Ex sequencing, during which virologists, of course also do not
Speaker 7: conduct any control experiments, but Stefan Lanka will do it
Speaker 7: for them and show that from this cell culture in
Speaker 7: which there is no virus at all, using their methods,
Speaker 7: you can sequence the genome of SARS, cove two virus, ebolavirus,
Speaker 7: measles virus, and any virus you want. I will talk
Speaker 7: about these experiments later when they are finished. We will
Speaker 7: not discuss this now, but as you can see, the
Speaker 7: resource of RNA was added to this culture. This RNA
Speaker 7: is obtained from yeast, but not from ordinary yeast, but
Speaker 7: from a matrix substance. It was added there because when
Speaker 7: virologists add lung fluid from a patient to a cell culture.
Speaker 7: They introduce a large amount of nucleic acids. Therefore, with
Speaker 7: the help of RNA from the east, they try to
Speaker 7: mimic the patient's sputum, which is rich in such molecules.
Speaker 7: Yeast derived RNA is completely neutral. It is not pathogenic
Speaker 7: in any way, but here you can see that its
Speaker 7: presence causes an even greater cytopathic effect, although it is
Speaker 7: not related to any pathogen. Friends, this experiment refutes all
Speaker 7: the theory on which virology is built. The theory that
Speaker 7: viruses exist and cause disease has now been completely disproved.
Speaker 7: These experiments show that what virologists call evidence of the
Speaker 7: presence of a virus in a tissue sample are just
Speaker 7: consequences caused by the very conditions of the experiment in
Speaker 7: the laboratory, and they are never caused by the presence
Speaker 7: of a non existent virus. So let's summarize. If the
Speaker 7: Tsarus cove two virus does not exist and has now
Speaker 7: been definitively scientifically proven, this means that there is no
Speaker 7: virus structure and no spike protein exists. I know someone
Speaker 7: will definitely ask about research on spike protein if you
Speaker 7: read these studies, you will see that they do not
Speaker 7: get this protein from the virus. They get a recumbinant protein,
Speaker 7: and this is done in the laboratory using fake computer
Speaker 7: generated genetic sequences. In general, this is not a real
Speaker 7: spike protein derived from a real virus. There is no
Speaker 7: viral genome. The so called genome of the Sarus cove
Speaker 7: two virus is an absolutely artificial computer creation that has
Speaker 7: nothing to do with anything real, and subsequent control experiments
Speaker 7: will demonstrate this to absolutely everyone. There are no viral strains.
Speaker 7: It is not possible to create any diagnostic test and
Speaker 7: a vaccine. Again, the PCR test vector and mRNA vaccines
Speaker 7: are based on a completely fake genetic sequence that has
Speaker 7: nothing to do with anything real. It is impossible to
Speaker 7: prove AUSSI relationship between a disease and a virus that
Speaker 7: does not exist. And the so called preventative measures taken
Speaker 7: by the government are not based on science. And the
Speaker 7: whole story called COVID nineteen is necessary only for social
Speaker 7: control and getting people used to dictatorship. Friends, as I've
Speaker 7: said earlier, we are on the verge of a very
Speaker 7: real scientific and medical revolution. I ask each of you
Speaker 7: to share this video wherever you can, because this is
Speaker 7: the only way we can make this revolution a reality.
Speaker 7: The scientific work of Stefan Lanka, which I told you
Speaker 7: about today, will not be allowed to be published in
Speaker 7: any scientific journal. This information will be suppressed as much
Speaker 7: as possible. Therefore, it is the duty of each of
Speaker 7: us to share this information. This is the only way
Speaker 7: it can get enough publicity to influence the course of
Speaker 7: our history.
Speaker 2: All right, let's see how this goes. Move on to
Speaker 2: the next one, and I'll suppress my rage. I'm still happening.
Speaker 2: She's full of shit. Oh my god, it's not overloaded.
Speaker 2: And even if it was, you can't use you can't
Speaker 2: use your your net if you have it, that's it
Speaker 2: only works if you don't use it, right is that?
Speaker 2: What is that what they're saying to me?
Speaker 1: The fuck?
Speaker 2: Are you serious? Alright, So I'm trying to get onto
Speaker 2: the next thing, but they're making me start all over again.
Speaker 4: Here.
Speaker 2: Let's try this so technical difficulties that wouldn't have to
Speaker 2: be part of our lives would not have to be
Speaker 2: part of our lives if we just get to this
Speaker 2: goal as soon as possible.
Speaker 6: And they.
Speaker 2: They moved where I was Why why why did they
Speaker 2: do that? I had everything set up and now it's dropped.
Speaker 2: This is absolutely fucking bullshit. Everything was lined up, properly done,
Speaker 2: ready to rock, ready to do, and now it's just
Speaker 2: fucked every fucking way. Uh all right, Well, we're gonna
Speaker 2: watch Stefan Lanka now and then I'm gonna get into
Speaker 2: the reading part of this. This is from my video
Speaker 2: fromut almost two years ago. It says one, if you're
Speaker 2: eleven months and twenty nine days, it still says it's
Speaker 2: a year ago. It's other clocks work. So anyway, let's
Speaker 2: get into this and I'm tryn have to change it
Speaker 2: back to where it was. Let's get pass that crap, and.
Speaker 1: That may be and much more will be revealed.
Speaker 2: All right, So what we're gonna be looking at is
Speaker 2: we're gonna listen to about Vercau and this is once
Speaker 2: again doctor Stefan Laka. Now, I'm I'm gonna tell you
Speaker 2: the German new medicine is not the whole story and
Speaker 2: it's not just emotional trauma that causes illness that does
Speaker 2: affect the micro zeima. But he's not bringing up bey shomp,
Speaker 2: which again is a major problem. And even though I
Speaker 2: respect doctor Laka for all the things that woman just explained.
Speaker 2: Missing something a big part of the history. All right,
Speaker 2: he's talking about phaso sites in here, which again no
Speaker 2: So anyway.
Speaker 6: This first part we deal with the difficult part, namely
Speaker 6: biology as it is not, and that may be painful
Speaker 6: refuting genetics, but this biology lesson is a prerequisite for
Speaker 6: understanding why we falsely believe in viruses.
Speaker 1: Where does it come from? What are the concepts behind it?
Speaker 6: If we are constricted, we're forced to think in opposites,
Speaker 6: in good or evil, that something is there to harm
Speaker 6: us or even to be used for evil. You'll see
Speaker 6: it is just a false product of our history. And
Speaker 6: I'll show you this step by step. I am a
Speaker 6: biologist myself. I was a marine biologist for a long time.
Speaker 6: I came across a structure that I then interpreted as
Speaker 6: a harmless virus. Now we know these are really many spores.
Speaker 6: These spores have a specific function. At the time, I
Speaker 6: was a virologist, but I still believe.
Speaker 2: Nope, see that's the thing. It's not spores. This is
Speaker 2: where the misconception begins. But we're here for the vicau
Speaker 2: and then we'll fix what he's saying afterward. If there
Speaker 2: are spores in addition to the microzyma, that's one thing.
Speaker 2: But these granules that used talking about are not sportes.
Speaker 2: They may appear to be, but they are not completely different.
Speaker 2: They are life. They digest. It's all about nutrition. It's
Speaker 2: all about being fed and its product like fermentation. Spores
Speaker 2: don't do that.
Speaker 6: Eieved an evil viruses. So I took it step by
Speaker 6: step and went deeper and deeper into where that idea
Speaker 6: came from a rig. I concluded that they were wrong.
Speaker 6: Come with me on this journey. I also revealed my
Speaker 6: challenge back then. But after that lecture, we found that
Speaker 6: the majority of the population believe in these concepts the
Speaker 6: way we believe in terrorism, and that our own molecules
Speaker 6: can turn into terrorists within the body, which only destroy
Speaker 6: and which can even go wandering around. Whoever believes this
Speaker 6: also believes in flying metastases gets angry at those who
Speaker 6: don't wear a mask. So let's start on this presentation.
Speaker 6: Here we see a model of a coronavirus. We could
Speaker 6: also look at any other virus model as these are
Speaker 6: all artwork. And right away we have the first tough
Speaker 6: lesson because None of this corresponds to actual reality.
Speaker 1: None of it.
Speaker 6: The proteins, the spikes, the bits of nucleic acid. This
Speaker 6: is a model that doesn't exist in reality. Telling you,
Speaker 6: if you learn the new biology, which we get into
Speaker 6: in the second part, then you'll understand when you know
Speaker 6: real biology, this can't possibly exist. Here's the so called
Speaker 6: nucleic acid, the theoretical genetic strand of a theoretical virus
Speaker 6: that is the heart of the virus. We test that
Speaker 6: hypothesis here. And the simple thing about Corona is that
Speaker 6: it has never been proven to exist. Out of very
Speaker 6: short pieces of genetic strands, they calculated mathematically a whole
Speaker 6: single strand of genetic material that does not exist in reality.
Speaker 6: And if you understand where these concepts come from, why
Speaker 6: we as a culture believe in it, then we'll have
Speaker 6: real leverage, namely to use Corona as an opportunity to
Speaker 6: address the unfortunate developments and politics and are so called
Speaker 6: represent sentsitive democracy in our media system, etc. We have
Speaker 6: a chance to change things from the foundation because of Corona.
Speaker 6: We can only change if there is a global dogma
Speaker 6: and means of communication. Without these two prerequisites, change is
Speaker 6: not possible one country opts out, the others will fight them.
Speaker 6: But when something shakes the whole world at once and
Speaker 6: it's clear that it's not true, then we have a
Speaker 6: chance and we can learn from our mistakes, because if
Speaker 6: we don't learn, we are forced to repeat forever. More So,
Speaker 6: we have a big task ahead of us, and only
Speaker 6: a few hours to understand.
Speaker 1: Where these ideas came from.
Speaker 6: Back in history we go about two thoy, four hundred
Speaker 6: years when this person Democratus, learned from his teacher and
Speaker 6: then expanded himself with motivation to form the basics for
Speaker 6: our teachers today, for our understanding of life, but also
Speaker 6: of disease. So Democratus said, we need an explanation of life,
Speaker 6: an explanation of disease. But we don't want any consciousness, please,
Speaker 6: we don't want spirit in it. We don't want gods.
Speaker 6: Why because religion always causes fear, and that's why.
Speaker 2: Well, also because they're moving into this secular humanism, and
Speaker 2: this is why the Freemasons adopted this right. They're taking
Speaker 2: God and spirit in the vital force out of science. Well,
Speaker 2: you can't do that if that's what the natural order is,
Speaker 2: If that's what natural law is if it incorporates that,
Speaker 2: and it does, then everything that you're doing to deny
Speaker 2: that is going to be based on a false reality.
Speaker 6: Why we need a materialistic explanation of life. He postulated
Speaker 6: that there are atoms that are immortal, and when they
Speaker 6: join together they form molecules. Then these molecules merge again,
Speaker 6: and this somehow results in life. This purely materialistic idea
Speaker 6: of life sounded great. It was motivation to stop religious fear.
Speaker 6: But they never imagined that a new religion would emerge
Speaker 6: from it, namely a religion of good and evil. Which
Speaker 6: forces us to think materialistically because if we want to
Speaker 6: explain something that actually exists, an illness and disease that
Speaker 6: appears simultaneously or one after the other, we are forced
Speaker 6: to believe in physical defects as reality.
Speaker 1: We have no other choice.
Speaker 6: If talking about consciousness is forbidden, we can't imagine that
Speaker 6: a word can actually kill, which it can, or that
Speaker 6: a word can heal. If thinking is forbidden, then it
Speaker 6: is naturally unthinkable that a word can become or transform flesh,
Speaker 6: for example, so called psychosomatics that I'll touch on in
Speaker 6: part two. But for now, we've had a state supported
Speaker 6: philosophy for twenty five hundred years, where it is forbidden
Speaker 6: to think to explore whether consciousness actually gives form or not,
Speaker 6: and can it affect your health. Languages from all nations
Speaker 6: are full of idioms that show that it can, that
Speaker 6: a fright can run through my bones and up my
Speaker 6: bones to my kidneys and liver and so on. It
Speaker 6: shows what's going on here. It was Plato who quoted
Speaker 6: his teachers Socrates, saying the Greek doctors can no longer
Speaker 6: deal with diseases anymore. They were just using medication to
Speaker 6: suppress symptoms in order to get slaves back to work faster.
Speaker 6: But free people would still have their souls treated with
Speaker 6: a body soul biology, which is very exciting, which we'll
Speaker 6: talk about in the second part. After that, from Socrates
Speaker 6: and Plato, we go a long way forward in history
Speaker 6: to Eugene Rosenstock, who I consider the strongest and most
Speaker 6: important German thinker at least of our time, because he
Speaker 6: predicted this whole thing in detail. He said, if we
Speaker 6: research purely materially, then we end up like Greek criminal law,
Speaker 6: where we have precedence, and so everything we observe we
Speaker 6: judge as a precedent. Then it's impossible to imagine anything
Speaker 6: new or to bring about changes with this approach. Rosenstock
Speaker 6: first published Sociology one in nineteen twenty nine, then in
Speaker 6: book form in nineteen fifty six. I recommend reading a
Speaker 6: reprint the way he wanted it in two thousand and
Speaker 6: seven by Theelheimer Publishing House. He writes here about a
Speaker 6: very important mechanism why it is the way it is today, namely,
Speaker 6: the growth point and the scientific age lies in a
Speaker 6: new tension between research and knowledge, this fight, which is
Speaker 6: still largely underestimated today. What he means by this is
Speaker 6: over here we have scientists, and way over here we
Speaker 6: have researchers. Scholars have reputations and have to be competent
Speaker 6: and are therefore incapable of allowing subversion of their work.
Speaker 6: They are scientist and bureaucrats, and they will stand together
Speaker 6: against amateurs. But research officially belongs to science, like the
Speaker 6: Holy Spirit belongs to the church. So we have n
Speaker 6: mass pseudoscience competing with free research. Yet only the pseudoscience
Speaker 6: alone is supported by the official bodies and foundations, because
Speaker 6: only that is worthy of their support in their professional opinion.
Speaker 6: Side note read an Rand's anthem to understand where this
Speaker 6: leads such jam research acts on the principle to have
Speaker 6: one's cake and eat it too, and now comes a
Speaker 6: sentence that has been the elephant in the room since
Speaker 6: nineteen twenty nine. They researched cancer according to pastures outdated
Speaker 6: ideas as if cancer was like rabies. So a double
Speaker 6: criticism here. Cancer theory is not right. Plus it's based
Speaker 6: on pastures infection theory, which is not right either. You
Speaker 6: have to imagine the suffering of people in an area,
Speaker 6: in a family. If I am in a family or
Speaker 6: a neighborhood, all suffering and dying with the same diagnosis,
Speaker 6: it's proof that evil must exist there. They used religion
Speaker 6: according to Wellhausen's ideas, but because his research relied on
Speaker 6: old establishment authority, it was well financed as long as
Speaker 6: scholars and researchers remained poor. Real research had prospects up
Speaker 6: until nineteen oh three, when the prospects for research deteriorated
Speaker 6: because the for profit establishment people finance science like Corona,
Speaker 6: so that power shifts away from real research to the pseudoscience.
Speaker 6: Our Rockefeller doctor factories and grants, our eloquent testimony unbelievably true.
Speaker 1: The next important thinker in this field is Evon.
Speaker 2: Illitt, and fortunately he still carries the virus notion. Though,
Speaker 2: so if you read the book it's called Medical Nemesis,
Speaker 2: I mean it's worth the read, I guess, but I
Speaker 2: have to shake my head so many times I stopped
Speaker 2: reading it.
Speaker 6: He's a philosopher who predicted Corona back in nineteen seventy six.
Speaker 6: In his book The Nemesis of Medicine. He stated that
Speaker 6: if medicine is not separated from the economy, then it
Speaker 6: must provide increasing profit year after year. But where is
Speaker 6: the biology in that? What happens? They exaggerate little by little, unnoticed,
Speaker 6: like the frog in the water that slowly comes to
Speaker 6: the boil. Ilich said, there comes a point when the
Speaker 6: whole thing destroys society as a whole. He describes the
Speaker 6: exaggeration in the book, starting with vaccination, but also shows
Speaker 6: it in cases of fever. We're at forty three degrees.
Speaker 6: You used to give treatment than at forty degrees, then
Speaker 6: at thirty nine, thirty eight, and today mothers are treated
Speaker 6: instead of sent away if they bring their children to
Speaker 6: the pediatrician with a thirty seven point eight fever because
Speaker 6: the mother is hyperventilating with fear, and this he described
Speaker 6: back in nineteen seventy six.
Speaker 1: Also ignored this man.
Speaker 6: Rudolph Virkau was the one who came up with the
Speaker 6: concept of a defective carrier for explaining illnesses. He is
Speaker 6: one of the most dramatic figures in our history. He
Speaker 6: was an epidemiologist during the French Revolution of eighteen forty eight, which,
Speaker 6: although didn't have the desired outcome, brought about a little
Speaker 6: progress right after eighteen forty eight, though it got worse
Speaker 6: at first and there was a rollback in eighteen forty eight.
Speaker 6: Vierkoo came up with titles. I mean, he named diseases.
Speaker 6: He was such an official. He made questionnaires for people
Speaker 6: who got sick and found if they had bedbugs, they
Speaker 6: got sick. If they breathed in vapors from feces, they
Speaker 6: get sick. If they don't have a chimney, yes, they
Speaker 6: get sick. If they have a damp fuel, etc. Give
Speaker 6: the people sewage works, give them better social conditions, and
Speaker 6: they get better and they stay healthy. He was commissioned
Speaker 6: to do this for them. He is still praised to
Speaker 6: this day. His motivation was unclear, and it is still
Speaker 6: not well known what he did. Ten years later, he
Speaker 6: wanted to become a priest. His father forbade that because
Speaker 6: he himself had an expensive hobby in debts. So he
Speaker 6: discouraged Virkao, saying, you really have to become famous and rich,
Speaker 6: which you can't do as a pastor.
Speaker 2: So Verrko ken these days.
Speaker 6: I studied medicine with the military because an uncle on
Speaker 6: his father's side was a major in the Prussian army.
Speaker 6: But state sponsored medicine was only twenty percent of medicine
Speaker 6: at that.
Speaker 2: Time, and they had to fix that, didn't they, and
Speaker 2: was hated.
Speaker 6: By the general public. State medicine had a bad reputation.
Speaker 6: They were responsible for Oregon harvesting, so he got a
Speaker 6: bad reputation. Neither poverty nor wealth came to him. So
Speaker 6: he became the leader of the reform movement. Of these
Speaker 6: military doctors like him. Eighty percent were completely free to
Speaker 6: do whatever they wanted wherever they wanted to practice, national
Speaker 6: or international. Nothing was regulated, can you imagine. So he
Speaker 6: had to somehow get into the highest state office. Then
Speaker 6: he said the state had to merge with medicine. So
Speaker 6: medicine and science had to be nationalized so that humanitarian
Speaker 6: catastrophes such as typhus, epidemics, cholera, et cetera, would be
Speaker 6: prevented in the future.
Speaker 2: All of those things done by industrial pollutions, other types
Speaker 2: of poisons and malnutrition, those quote unquote epidemics, they're giving
Speaker 2: themselves something to do when they're not when they're not
Speaker 2: even addressing the actual issue. So they're creating, they're creating
Speaker 2: work for them so that they become relevant. None of
Speaker 2: these names that they they name a set of symptoms,
Speaker 2: they call that a disease, and then they tell you
Speaker 2: it's coming from the air, it's coming from your neighbor,
Speaker 2: it's your being infected by a contagion. All bullshit.
Speaker 1: Future. The revolution was just a flash in the pan.
Speaker 6: Fortunately nobody died, but everyone who was on the barricades
Speaker 6: was banned from practicing.
Speaker 1: But not him.
Speaker 6: He was protected and taken away from the public eye
Speaker 6: to become a full professor at the University of Ursberg,
Speaker 6: and there he comes up with a completely new theory
Speaker 6: refuting the old humors, whereby he postulated that disease was
Speaker 6: caused by disease toxins because one could observe that one
Speaker 6: gets sick if one takes disease toxins, like when a
Speaker 6: teenager drinks a whole bottle of vodka. Up until ten
Speaker 6: years ago, they would be dead unless their stomach was
Speaker 6: pumped out. We all know, well maybe not all, but
Speaker 6: Boris Yeltsen needed two leaders of vodka just to be
Speaker 6: able to speak in parliament and three just to get
Speaker 6: out a Panzer battle tank because he had anti toxins
Speaker 6: as in the old humors theory, where you get better
Speaker 6: if you have the antidote.
Speaker 1: That's how this defective.
Speaker 6: Carrier gene thing still falsely persists in medicine of the
Speaker 6: virus theory and the antibody that is supposed to neutralize it.
Speaker 6: That is the theory that the majority of the population
Speaker 6: still believes to this day. He first fought these humorous teachers.
Speaker 6: He had many arguments published against it, which were right
Speaker 6: to this day. But then later he flipped and revived
Speaker 6: the ancient humor's theory in eighteen fifty eight, fighting famous
Speaker 6: doctors like Bill Roth, the surgeon whose surgical technique is
Speaker 6: still used today for kidneys, moving himself into the management
Speaker 6: position where Christian Drawstin now sits as the cherrite manipulating
Speaker 6: world politics. There he became director, stepping over people who
Speaker 6: were much more qualified because he was protected Freemasonry.
Speaker 2: And this was eighteen fifty eight that he did this flip.
Speaker 2: Eighteen fifty nine you have the Darwin book being published, right,
Speaker 2: and he was. Although they say there's nothing conclusive as
Speaker 2: to whether or not he was a Freemason. He's adopting
Speaker 2: all of their principles and mindset and his grandfather, his sons,
Speaker 2: all the people surrounding Darwin or all Freemasons. So if
Speaker 2: they just kept it quiet that he wasn't, that's a
Speaker 2: very strong possibility.
Speaker 1: And what did he claim in eighteen.
Speaker 2: And everything after seventeen eighty was going to be poisoned
Speaker 2: by the Francis Jesuit infection into Now that's an infection,
Speaker 2: an infiltration into the Freemasonic lodgist where they you know,
Speaker 2: you can call it perfectible list in, you can call
Speaker 2: it the Illuminati, whatever you want to do it. You
Speaker 2: want to call it Zionism, and it doesn't matter. They're
Speaker 2: all working off of the Kabbala in there, and it's
Speaker 2: delirium Kabbala. Yeah, So that's where you get Zionism slash Frankism, Sabatinism,
Speaker 2: all that stuff from and that is the initiative to
Speaker 2: basically wipe out and turn the world into cultivated, into
Speaker 2: a place of chaos and misery and corruption, so that
Speaker 2: they can have their messia come back and clean it.
Speaker 6: Upteen fifty eight, he said life consists of individual cells.
Speaker 1: That was clear.
Speaker 6: Life arises through cell division of a single cell, and
Speaker 6: all diseases can be traced back to a single cell
Speaker 6: producing the disease poison virus and distributing it to the
Speaker 6: other cells, and it would then diffuse and the disease
Speaker 6: would spread in the whole body. He came up with
Speaker 6: this theory, and this is the crux via an anti
Speaker 6: clerical network the Free Masons. His maternal uncle who helped
Speaker 6: him wasn't only a friend of the Prussian king, but
Speaker 6: was also the head of the Freemasons, and they had
Speaker 6: their own bible, a booklet about Democratus which was in
Speaker 6: a simple format by a Roman poet Lucretius, from the
Speaker 6: year two hundred AD that survived the iconoclasm of Christianity
Speaker 6: and would be stolen in fourteen oh eight from a
Speaker 6: German library and then copied and copied and copied and
Speaker 6: from this book, Democratus's twenty two hundred year old Adam
Speaker 6: theory was transported to the future and usurped by Verkou
Speaker 6: to make it look like Virkau invented some new idea,
Speaker 6: the smallest indivisible unit of life, the cell, although it
Speaker 6: was clear it was tissue tissues in woven networks, so
Speaker 6: Virkou merged the cell theory in to that. Later Einstein coincidentally,
Speaker 6: another famous plagiarist and freemason with access to the same book,
Speaker 6: also postulated atomic theory, and blah blah blah came across
Speaker 6: the same thing that the disease poison would diffuse into
Speaker 6: other cells. And Vierkow had political success because he stated
Speaker 6: that there are individuals in society who are like parasites.
Speaker 6: He recommended we eradicate them from root to branch, birthing
Speaker 6: the excuse for eugenics. Once a humanitarian, he injected.
Speaker 2: The excuse for eugenics, and what is Darwinism all about?
Speaker 2: What are they talking about here? What sets the ground
Speaker 2: for this? And what are we actually experiencing right now
Speaker 2: with the allopathic medical system. It's blind eugenics, indifferent to
Speaker 2: who they kill. Doesn't matter at all, as long as
Speaker 2: you're not one of them, your fair game. And they
Speaker 2: wiped their own people out too. Just disagree once and
Speaker 2: see what happens.
Speaker 6: Did this theoretical cellular pathology as a scientifically founded claim
Speaker 6: into the political arena and turned everything on its head,
Speaker 6: claiming everything comes from the individual cell, so the theory
Speaker 6: of disease being caused by disease poison would then be official.
Speaker 6: Virkoo hid the information they already had, specifically that disease.
Speaker 1: Did not spread.
Speaker 6: But after six hundred and fifty years of the magnifying glass,
Speaker 6: when microscopes came along, you.
Speaker 2: Caught that They said that disease is not spread. Correct,
Speaker 2: it doesn't even to spread within the same body.
Speaker 6: It became clear that each organ consists of four different tissues.
Speaker 6: Well back then three tissues were found, but we now
Speaker 6: know there are four, so three different tissues which when diseased,
Speaker 6: only one of these three tissues died. But this new
Speaker 6: finding was not publicized and shared correctly, but instead ignored,
Speaker 6: so this information was not spread. And that was just
Speaker 6: one example of how the humoral theory was refuted. The
Speaker 6: ancient humor's theory of poison and more poison as the
Speaker 6: antidote with which, among others, Amadeus Mozart died and was
Speaker 6: transported into the beyond, now playing a harp in heaven.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 6: In any case, it's clear he was in a healing
Speaker 6: crisis in which he was cramping. When we suffer a
Speaker 6: motor trauma, that's called epilepsy, and then he had a
Speaker 6: fever and so on, and back then they believed he
Speaker 6: had many illnesses, and so they drained a lot of blood,
Speaker 6: blood letting. They drained too much blood, and that's why
Speaker 6: he's stone dead. That is the story of disease, poison
Speaker 6: and the blood letting, and that's what was set in stone.
Speaker 6: So the stage was set to grasp that the whole
Speaker 6: concept is probably not correct, and if cellular pathology is
Speaker 6: not correct, then our theory of cells is not correct,
Speaker 6: and then virus theory is implicated and not correct, which
Speaker 6: I came across, as I said, being a biologist and
Speaker 6: becoming a marine biologist. I saw all this poison ending
Speaker 6: up in the sea and it hit home and I
Speaker 6: then discovered a structure of marine biology that I believed
Speaker 6: at the time was a harmless virus. Why harmless because
Speaker 6: these are all over the world or maybe on one
Speaker 6: coast that produces this structure which looks like a so
Speaker 6: called textbook virus. The alleged viruses seen here are in
Speaker 6: large just as we imagine them reproducing, reproducing, and I
Speaker 6: noticed it's not going well. They're not surviving. And I
Speaker 6: was able to isolate structures from these and see the
Speaker 6: same biochemical composition every time. So I had something and
Speaker 6: saw the same protein. I repeated isolation hundreds of times,
Speaker 6: and with each time got the same nucleic acid and
Speaker 6: the same biochemistry.
Speaker 2: Which means they're not They're not at the smallest level
Speaker 2: what he's looking at here. That's going to be evident
Speaker 2: when we get into the talk. But he's talking about
Speaker 2: nucleic acid and he's talking about proteins, and that's going
Speaker 2: to be still in the same misconception. He's basing this
Speaker 2: off of his virology background is you know, marine biologists background,
Speaker 2: so he's conventionally taught. But when you get in, when
Speaker 2: we get into microzymas and we talk about base you're
Speaker 2: going to see how this itself is another misconception.
Speaker 6: Histree, I had isolated something and was then able to
Speaker 6: show sufficient proof that they are always identically composed. Next,
Speaker 6: we see these particles that are supposed to be the
Speaker 6: measles virus.
Speaker 1: They are shown to us and they say these are viruses.
Speaker 6: Here we see a couple of small parts with circular appearance, spherical,
Speaker 6: but then big chunks here. And these structures presented to
Speaker 6: us as viruses have never been seen in humans, never
Speaker 6: in animals, never in liquids, in mucous membranes, in saliva,
Speaker 6: in blood, in urine.
Speaker 1: Never.
Speaker 6: Everything that we are shown as viruses are false. They
Speaker 6: are just typical tissue decomposition products of the test tubes
Speaker 6: with which we work with, in which you try to
Speaker 6: or believe you can study life, which goes back to Vircoo.
Speaker 6: He was a pathologist who believed that by looking at
Speaker 6: decayed matter, of decaying tissue, he could somehow learn about life.
Speaker 6: And that's exactly what we're still doing today. We take
Speaker 6: tissue from organisms like monkey kidney tissue that last the
Speaker 6: longest in the test tube. At least that's what they
Speaker 6: like to say, but they really only live a bit
Speaker 6: longer because we surround them with a blood serum taken
Speaker 6: from a cow fetus in utero serum is blood without
Speaker 6: any solid components. If we took it from adult cows
Speaker 6: or grown mammals with no blood stem cells, the tissue
Speaker 6: would die immediately. But with fetal serum, it stays alive
Speaker 6: for a while and doesn't disintegrate so quickly. And these
Speaker 6: signs of decay and these pictures are a unique, specific
Speaker 6: in vitro test tube phenomenon that has never been seen
Speaker 6: in actual in vivo life.
Speaker 1: Quickly we move from being.
Speaker 6: Virus believers to an end to virology with WIR. These
Speaker 6: particles here are shown to us as viruses, but what
Speaker 6: are they really? They take broken down tissue, isolate this
Speaker 6: tissue from everything around the core that can still survive,
Speaker 6: and chunks of the tissue develop little fingers, spikes, or
Speaker 6: crowns very quickly, like an amieba that wants to rebuild
Speaker 6: the tissue again. That's why everyone who works with these
Speaker 6: cell cultures and test tubes has to constantly separate.
Speaker 1: Them again and again.
Speaker 6: These little chunks of tissue are misinterpreted as cells, and
Speaker 6: these little fingers with which it drags itself along to
Speaker 6: try and rebuild the tissue, these are called the villi,
Speaker 6: of which a cross section in the electron microscope underneath
Speaker 6: is presented to us as viruses. It's that simple. It's
Speaker 6: hocus pocus zimsalabim.
Speaker 1: We see that.
Speaker 6: The virologists later we will learn why, are completely anti
Speaker 6: scientific because they never, on any level of their work
Speaker 6: do or document control experiments. For example, they could have
Speaker 6: cut through chunks at the edge or in the middle.
Speaker 6: In the middle, the diameter appears large. At the edge
Speaker 6: it is smaller like this, And if I am outside
Speaker 6: the chunks of tissue, then nothing would appear. And those
Speaker 6: on the edge are the only photos they are constantly
Speaker 6: presenting to us. You don't even find areas where you
Speaker 6: just have some spherical particles. If you look, the rest
Speaker 6: of the tissue is still there.
Speaker 2: You okay, we're gonna stop with this right here, because
Speaker 2: there's gonna be you guys should check out this whole video.
Speaker 2: It's you know, one hour three minutes long, so or
Speaker 2: four minutes long, but that's where it is. It's on
Speaker 2: my rumble channel. Just get onto my actual channel then
Speaker 2: type Lanka. You should be able to find three videos.
Speaker 2: This is one of them.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 2: So some of the things he was saying about the
Speaker 2: cross section and I would be thicker than middle. It's
Speaker 2: not so. The whole idea of the cell being the
Speaker 2: root of life, the structure of life, and its finest detail,
Speaker 2: is not correct, and we're going to find out all
Speaker 2: that soon. Let's just go ahead here, and I'm going
Speaker 2: to read a little bit of this introduction. So they
Speaker 2: refer to the person who does the translation for the
Speaker 2: book from Beas Schamp Blood in its turnout atomical element.
Speaker 2: He calls him the master, Professor Beschamp, especially as in
Speaker 2: my opinion, it would not be easy to carry out
Speaker 2: among them the conspiracy of silence, by means of which
Speaker 2: the discover discoveries of the Master had been buried in
Speaker 2: favor of distorted plagiarisms of his labors, which had been
Speaker 2: productive of abortions, such as the microbi microbian or germ
Speaker 2: theory of disease. This makes you here you go. Now
Speaker 2: I lost my spot, as has been correctly and he says,
Speaker 2: here you go, germ theory of disease, the greatest scientific
Speaker 2: silliness of the age, as it has been correctly styled
Speaker 2: by the Master. To this suggestion, Professor Beschamp gave hearty
Speaker 2: assent and told me to proceed exactly as I might
Speaker 2: think they's talking about, you know, talking to him specifically
Speaker 2: when he's about eighty five years old, and deciding which
Speaker 2: they were going to publish first, So he says, he
Speaker 2: introduced new yet simple processes of experiment experimentation of great
Speaker 2: value which enabled him to publish a list of definite
Speaker 2: compounds and to isolate a series of siable ferments to
Speaker 2: which he gave the name zymess to obscure his discoveries.
Speaker 2: The name diasties diastases, sorry has been has often been
Speaker 2: given to these ferments, but that of zymas must be restored.
Speaker 2: He also showed the importance of these siable products, the zymess,
Speaker 2: which are secreted by living organisms. He was thus led
Speaker 2: to study the fermentation led to the study of fermentations.
Speaker 2: Contrary to the then generally received chemical theory. He demonstrated
Speaker 2: that the alcoholic fermentation of beer yeast was of the
Speaker 2: same order at as a phenomenon which characterized the regular
Speaker 2: performance of an act of life digestion. In eighteen fifty six,
Speaker 2: he showed that molds transformed cane sugar into invert sugar
Speaker 2: glucose in the same manner as does the inverting fermat
Speaker 2: secreted by beer yeast. The development of these molds is
Speaker 2: aided by certain salts impeded by others, but without molds
Speaker 2: there is no transformation. He showed that a sugar solution
Speaker 2: treated with precipitated calcic carbonate so calcium carbonate, does not
Speaker 2: undergo inversion when care is taken to prevent the access
Speaker 2: to it of external germs, whose presence in the air
Speaker 2: was originally demonstrated by him. If to such a solution
Speaker 2: the calcareous rock of mende or sends be added instead
Speaker 2: of pure calcic carbonate, molds appear and the inversion takes place.
Speaker 2: These molds under the microscope are seen to be formed
Speaker 2: by a collection of molecular granulations, which Beshomp named microzymas
Speaker 2: not found in pure calcic carbonate. They are found in
Speaker 2: geological calcareous strata, and bay Shop established that they were
Speaker 2: living beings, living beings capable of inverting sugar, and some
Speaker 2: of them to make it ferment. He also showed that
Speaker 2: these granulations under certain conditions evolved into bacteria. This is
Speaker 2: the pleomorphic microzyma. To enable these discoveries to be appropriated
Speaker 2: by another the name microbe was later applied to them,
Speaker 2: and this term is better known than that of microzyma.
Speaker 2: But the latter name must be restored, and the word
Speaker 2: microbe must be erased from the language of science, into
Speaker 2: which it has introduced an overwhelming confusion. It is also
Speaker 2: an etymological solcism. Bechamp denied spontaneous generation, while Pasture continued
Speaker 2: to believe it. Later, he too denied spontaneous generation, but
Speaker 2: he did not understand his own experiments as talking about
Speaker 2: Pasture now, and they are of no value against the
Speaker 2: arguments of this sponteparis pouchet, which could be answered only
Speaker 2: by the microzimeon theory. So too, Pastor never understood either
Speaker 2: the process of digestion nor that of fermentation, both of
Speaker 2: which processes were explained by beas Champ and by a
Speaker 2: curious Embrillio. Was it intentional? Both of these discoveries have
Speaker 2: been ascribed to Pasteur. That Lister did, as he said,
Speaker 2: most probably derived his knowledge of anti sepsis, which bess
Speaker 2: Samp had discovered from Pasteur he gave past The credit
Speaker 2: is rendered probable by the falling peculiar facts in the
Speaker 2: earlier antisepar This is interesting antiseptic operations of Lister, the
Speaker 2: patients died in great numbers, so that it came to
Speaker 2: be a gruesome sort of medical joke to say that
Speaker 2: the operation was successful, but the patient died. But Lister
Speaker 2: was a surgeon of great skill and observation. He gradually
Speaker 2: reduced his employment of the antiseptic material to the necessary
Speaker 2: and not too large dose when his operations were successful
Speaker 2: and his patients lived. Had he learned his technique from
Speaker 2: the discoverer of antisepsist Bechamp, he would have saved his
Speaker 2: earlier patients. But deriving it at secondhand from a savant
Speaker 2: who did not understand the principle he was plagiarizing, Lister
Speaker 2: had to acquire his subsequent knowledge of the proper technique
Speaker 2: through his practice at the cost of earlier patients. Isn't
Speaker 2: that wonderful? The master carried further the aphorism of Vercau
Speaker 2: dominescell acele, which the state of microscopical microscopical art and
Speaker 2: science at the time had not enabled the latter to achieve.
Speaker 2: Not the cellule, but the microzyma must thanks to base
Speaker 2: Shamp's discoveries be today regarded as the unit of life
Speaker 2: for the cellules are themselves transient and are built up
Speaker 2: by the microzymes, which physiologically are imperishable, as he had
Speaker 2: clearly demonstrated. Base Champs studied the diseases of the silkworm
Speaker 2: then in nineteen sixty six, ravaging the southern provinces of France,
Speaker 2: and soon discovered that there were two of them, one
Speaker 2: pebrit which is due to a parasite, the other a
Speaker 2: flash array, which is constitutional. A month later, which means
Speaker 2: is part of it. A month later passedor and report
Speaker 2: to the Academy of his first silkworm campaign denied the parasite,
Speaker 2: saying of bey Shamp's observation that is an error. In
Speaker 2: his second part, he adopted it as though it were
Speaker 2: his own discovery. The foregoing is but a very imperfect
Speaker 2: list of the labors and discoveries of the master, of
Speaker 2: which we're now translated was the chronic gl Area. Let's
Speaker 2: go a little further, and there you go. So postscriptum,
Speaker 2: da da da da da. Let's get to talk about
Speaker 2: Galileo and the designment of comparison. Here, let's get a
Speaker 2: little further the history of a discussion. We're in chemistry
Speaker 2: and physiologic physiology closely united we're interested, which agitated the
Speaker 2: second half of the century. Now closing is well adapted
Speaker 2: to show that human nature has not changed since the
Speaker 2: time of Clianthus, and that there always exists persons ready
Speaker 2: to associate themselves together to contradict or insult the unfortunate
Speaker 2: wretch who has devised some new theory based upon inspected facts,
Speaker 2: which would compel them to reform their argument and abandon
Speaker 2: their prejudices. This work upon the Blood, which I present
Speaker 2: at last to the learned public, is a crown to
Speaker 2: a collection of works upon ferments and fermentations, upon spontaneous generation,
Speaker 2: upon albuminoid substances, upon organization, upon physiology, and general pathology,
Speaker 2: which I have pursued without relaxation since eighteen fifty four,
Speaker 2: at the same time with other researches of pure chemistry
Speaker 2: more or less directly related to them. And it must
Speaker 2: be added, in the midst of a thousand difficulties raised
Speaker 2: up by relentless opponents from all sides, especially once I
Speaker 2: least expect them to solve some very delicate problems, I
Speaker 2: had to create new methods of research of physiological, of
Speaker 2: chemical and anatomical analysis. Ever since eighteen fifty seven, these
Speaker 2: researches have been directed by a precise design to a
Speaker 2: determined and the nunciation of a new doctrine regarding organization
Speaker 2: in life. It led to the microzymon theory of living
Speaker 2: organism organization which had which has led to the discovery
Speaker 2: of the true nature of blood by that of its
Speaker 2: third anatomica element, and at least to a rational natural
Speaker 2: explanation of of the phenomenon called its spontaneous coagulation. But
Speaker 2: the microzymeon theory, which is to biology, with the Lavasarian
Speaker 2: theory of matter is to chemistry, as is founded on
Speaker 2: the discovery of microzymas living organisms of an unsuspected category,
Speaker 2: has been attacked in its principle by denying the very
Speaker 2: existence of microzymas. Since this was so, if the assertion
Speaker 2: that the microzymon theory of the living organization gives to
Speaker 2: biology a base as solid as does the Lavaurian theory
Speaker 2: to chemistry be deemed prudent, well I choose to commit
Speaker 2: this imprudence, and to be imprudent to the end, and
Speaker 2: to struggle against a current of opinion which is the
Speaker 2: more violent, as will be seen, the more it is artificial.
Speaker 6: It was the.
Speaker 2: Boldest of those who deny the fact of the existence
Speaker 2: of the micro zimis who wrote, whenever it can be done,
Speaker 2: it is useful to point out connection of new facts
Speaker 2: with earlier facts of the same order. Nothing is more
Speaker 2: satisfying to the mind than to be able to follow
Speaker 2: a discovery from its origin to its latest development. That
Speaker 2: is very well and fine, the more so that the
Speaker 2: author took good care not to follow this vise precept.
Speaker 2: Let us ascend them to the sources when to get
Speaker 2: past they.
Speaker 1: So fear.
Speaker 2: Fermentations and ferments were very simply explained Macure in seventeen
Speaker 2: seventy two, in agreement with the savants, regarded it as
Speaker 2: a certain scarded it as certain that vegetable and animal
Speaker 2: matter is abstracted from living organisms under certain conditions of
Speaker 2: the presence of water, of contact at least momentarily of
Speaker 2: the air, and of temperature, become altered of themselves, for
Speaker 2: men becoming futrid in production, in producing the fermat and
Speaker 2: according to the same principles, it was said that water
Speaker 2: could transmute itself into earth, the earth into a popular
Speaker 2: popular popular, and that the blood begets itself by transmutation
Speaker 2: of flesh into the flowing liquor. Now we're going to
Speaker 2: get into this in different ways, and I'm gonna be
Speaker 2: jumping around a little bit, but then we're gonna we're
Speaker 2: gonna circle back later and get more of the details.
Speaker 2: But he's arguing, and it's it's pretty clear why he's saying.
Speaker 2: What he's saying is that the blood is a type
Speaker 2: of flowing tissue, all right, and that the microzyme is
Speaker 2: there fibrit there's no fibrant engine, there's no fibrin that.
Speaker 2: It's something that has to do with the microzyme is
Speaker 2: itself and what it leaves behind, and that's what causes.
Speaker 2: So it's always supposed to be a solid, but when
Speaker 2: it hits the air, that's when you have the coagulation.
Speaker 2: But that's simplifying it too. I'll we'll get into that later.
Speaker 2: What we're trying to do is understand what the microzyme is.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 2: So there's a lot of tabs I need to put
Speaker 2: it in that I don't get to keep this book.
Speaker 2: I don't get to put it down as a as
Speaker 2: a PDF. I have to keep on hitting the borrow
Speaker 2: button so I will be as the weekend goes through.
Speaker 2: I'm going to be looking at this and pulling out
Speaker 2: the tabs that I want and just running down to
Speaker 2: the page numbers for the next one. Well, let's go
Speaker 2: to here. So it says, now this is from bey
Speaker 2: shomp or pasture, or this isn't a book that he wrote.
Speaker 2: This is a book that somebody wrote in uh appreciation
Speaker 2: of past of pay Shamp's work. So in the early
Speaker 2: sorry in the year sixteen eighty three, Antonios van Leland Howick,
Speaker 2: a Dutch naturalist and maker of lenses, communicated to the
Speaker 2: English Royal Society the results of observations which he had
Speaker 2: made with a simple microscope of his own construction, magnifying
Speaker 2: from one hundred to one hundred fret times. He found
Speaker 2: in water, saliva, dental tartar, etc. Entities he named animalcula.
Speaker 2: He described what he saw, and in his drawings showed
Speaker 2: both rod like and spiral forms, both of which he
Speaker 2: said had motility in all probability. The two species he
Speaker 2: saw where those now recognized as Bacillis Becallus maximus and
Speaker 2: Spirillum sputagenum leon. Howick's observations were purely objective and in
Speaker 2: striking contrast with the speculative views of M. Plensis, a
Speaker 2: Viennese physician physician who in sixteen or sorry seven teen
Speaker 2: sixty two published a German theory germ theory. What the
Speaker 2: hell's wrong with me? A germ theory of infectious disease.
Speaker 2: So that's how old this is, prior to my like
Speaker 2: microscopes barely being utilized. Vannes, physician who in seventeen sixty
Speaker 2: two published a germ theory of infectious diseases. Plensis maintained
Speaker 2: that there was a special organism by which each infectious
Speaker 2: disease was produced. This is the single cause, the one cause, right,
Speaker 2: that microorganisers were capable of reproduction outside of the body,
Speaker 2: and that they might be conveyed from place to place
Speaker 2: by the air. Here is Pastor's great thought in Toto,
Speaker 2: his complete germ theory, and yet put in print over
Speaker 2: a century before Pastor thought of it and published it
Speaker 2: as his own. One am I I want to be
Speaker 2: out on here and we have no connection again, and
Speaker 2: I'm getting furious by people tell me that there is
Speaker 2: no problem, that that's my problem. But anyway, note how
Speaker 2: concisely it anticipates all Pastors' ideas on journals. Well, there
Speaker 2: seems to be no proof that Princius had a microscope,
Speaker 2: or so he didn't have a microscope or knew of
Speaker 2: Leon Howick's and Immacula. Both are possible, indeed likely, as
Speaker 2: he was quite prominent, and he, rather than paste Or
Speaker 2: should have any credit that might come from such a discovery.
Speaker 2: If if the germ theory has any value, but it doesn't,
Speaker 2: this idea, which to the people of that time at least,
Speaker 2: must have accounted it easily and completely for such strange
Speaker 2: occurrences as contagion, infection, and epidemics, would have been widely
Speaker 2: discussed in the medical or scientific circles of that time
Speaker 2: and in literature available to Pasteur. That it was widely
Speaker 2: known is indicated by the fact that world famous English
Speaker 2: nervese Florence Nightingale I like this, I was interested in
Speaker 2: some of the things she said here, published an attack
Speaker 2: on the idea in eighteen sixty, over seventeen years before
Speaker 2: Pasture adopted it and claimed it as his own. She said,
Speaker 2: of infection, diseases are not individuals arranged in classes like
Speaker 2: cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another.
Speaker 2: It is not living in the continual mistake to is
Speaker 2: it not living in a continual mistake, to look upon
Speaker 2: diseases as we do now, as separate entities which must
Speaker 2: exist like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them
Speaker 2: as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and
Speaker 2: just as much under our control, or rather as the
Speaker 2: reactions of kindly nature against the conditions in which we
Speaker 2: have placed ourselves. Right, what are we eating? What are
Speaker 2: we not getting as far as nutrients? What kind of
Speaker 2: poisons are around us? What are we sucking up, absorbing
Speaker 2: through our skin, breathing in all that stuff chemicals, poisons.
Speaker 2: I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance,
Speaker 2: was a thing of which there was once a first
Speaker 2: specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself in
Speaker 2: a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a
Speaker 2: first dog or a first pair of dogs, and that
Speaker 2: smallpox would not begin itself any more than a new
Speaker 2: dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.
Speaker 2: Since then, I have seen with my own eyes and
Speaker 2: smelled with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens,
Speaker 2: either in close rooms or closed rooms, or in overcrowded wards,
Speaker 2: where it could not, by any possibility, have been caught
Speaker 2: quote unquote, but must have begun. I have seen diseases
Speaker 2: dude begin grow up and turn into one another. Now
Speaker 2: dogs do not turn into cats. I've seen, for instance,
Speaker 2: with the overcrowding, continued fever grow up and with a
Speaker 2: little more typhoid fever and with a little more typhus
Speaker 2: and all in the same word or hot. Would it
Speaker 2: not be far better, truer, or more practical if we
Speaker 2: looked upon disease in this light? For diseases, as all experienced, shows,
Speaker 2: are adjectives, not nouns, not noun substantiatives. True nursing ignorance infection,
Speaker 2: true nursing Nordics, except to prevent it. Okay, whatever, true
Speaker 2: nursing ignorance infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh
Speaker 2: air from open windows with remitting attention to the patient
Speaker 2: are the only defense. A true nurse either asks or
Speaker 2: needs why is in humane? Management of the patient is
Speaker 2: the best safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing
Speaker 2: it consists of preserving cleanliness. The specific disease doctrine is
Speaker 2: the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as
Speaker 2: now rule in the medical profession no specific diseases. There
Speaker 2: are specific disease conditions. And this is Florence Nightingale from
Speaker 2: eighteen fifty ish eighteen sixty. Here you have Florence Nightingale,
Speaker 2: the most famous nurse in history, after lifelong experience with infection,
Speaker 2: contagion and epidemics, challenging the germ theory seventeen years before
Speaker 2: Pastor put it forward as his own discovery. She clearly
Speaker 2: understood it and its utter fallacy better before eighteen sixty
Speaker 2: than Pastor did, either in eighteen seventy eight or later.
Speaker 2: Now to see what a parasite Pastor was on men
Speaker 2: who did things, let us digress and go back a
Speaker 2: few years to the time when the study of germs
Speaker 2: was an outgrowth of the study of fermentation. All right,
Speaker 2: so this we'll go into very long discussion. But there
Speaker 2: are some points here that I'm going to focus upon,
Speaker 2: and then, like I said, we'll get some more detail
Speaker 2: and the further shows that we do on this, and
Speaker 2: I need to get to page thirty nine. Come on, buddy,
Speaker 2: and the the internet sucks, but you got to help
Speaker 2: me out here thirty nine, buddy. All right, let's go
Speaker 2: to the danger of inoculating after discussing the practice medicine
Speaker 2: in the past and saying that since Jenner's and Pastors' days,
Speaker 2: the modern effort is to make the sick well. He
Speaker 2: says of inoculations. When a drug is administered by the mouth,
Speaker 2: as was beautifully pointed out by doctor Garth Wilkinson, and
Speaker 2: proceeding along the ailmet canal, it encounters along its whole
Speaker 2: line a series of chemical laboratories, wherein it is analyzed,
Speaker 2: synthesized and deleterious matter, prepared for excretion, and finally excreted,
Speaker 2: or it may be ejected from the stomach or overcome
Speaker 2: by an antidote. But when Nature's coat of mail the
Speaker 2: skin is violated and the drug inserted beneath the skin
Speaker 2: nature's line, the defense is outflanked, and rarely can anything
Speaker 2: be done to hinder or prevent the action of the drug,
Speaker 2: No matter how injurious or even fatal it may be.
Speaker 2: All the physicians of the world are incompetent either to
Speaker 2: foresee its action or to hinder it. Even pure water
Speaker 2: has been known to act as a violent as a
Speaker 2: violent and founderant poison when ejected, when injected into the
Speaker 2: blood stream, when injected into the blood stream. How much
Speaker 2: more dangerous is it than to inject poisons known to
Speaker 2: be such, whether modified in the fanciful manner at present
Speaker 2: fashionable among vivisectionists, or in any other manner. These simple
Speaker 2: considerations showed that inoculation should be regarded as malpractice, to
Speaker 2: be tolerated only in case of extreme danger, where the
Speaker 2: educated physician sees no other chance of saving life. The
Speaker 2: German theory fetish. Now the forcing of these inoculations upon
Speaker 2: individuals by law is one of the worst tyrannies imaginable,
Speaker 2: and should be resisted. This isn't the nineteen thirties. This
Speaker 2: was written so this was already something that had taken
Speaker 2: place in the past in Germany, even to the death
Speaker 2: of the official who is enforcing it. Right, they should
Speaker 2: be killed. English speaking people need to have ideals of
Speaker 2: liberty refreshed by a study of the history of Watt Tyler,
Speaker 2: who headed one of the most justifiable rebellions in history,
Speaker 2: and although treacherously murdered by the then Lord Mayor of London,
Speaker 2: his examples should be held up to all our children
Speaker 2: for imitation. The entire fabric of the Germ theory of
Speaker 2: disease rests upon the assumptions which not only have not
Speaker 2: been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many
Speaker 2: of them can be proved to the reverse of truth.
Speaker 2: The basic one of these unproven assumptions, the credit for
Speaker 2: which it is present in its present form, is wholly
Speaker 2: due to past or, is the hypothesis that all the
Speaker 2: so called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs,
Speaker 2: each disease having its own specific germ, these germs having
Speaker 2: existed in the air from the beginning of things, and
Speaker 2: that they and that though the body is closed to
Speaker 2: these pathogens germs when in good health, sorry, and that
Speaker 2: though the body is closed to these passage pathogens, my God,
Speaker 2: And that though and that, though the body is closed
Speaker 2: to these pathogens germs when in good health, when the
Speaker 2: vitality is lowered, the body becomes susceptible to their and ruds.
Speaker 2: I agree most heartily with doctor Leverson's statement that the
Speaker 2: forcing of these inoculations upon individuals by law is one
Speaker 2: of the worst tyrannies maageable, and should be resisted even
Speaker 2: to the death of the official who is enforcing it.
Speaker 2: Strong words, but absolutely right. Professor F. W. Newman of
Speaker 2: Oxford University has said against the body of a healthy man,
Speaker 2: Parliament has no right of assault whatever under pretense of
Speaker 2: the public health, nor any the more against the body
Speaker 2: of a healthy infant. To forbid perfect health is a
Speaker 2: tyrannical wickedness, just as much as to forbid chastity, chastity
Speaker 2: or sobriety. No lawgiver can have that right. The law
Speaker 2: is an unendurable usurpation and creates the right of resistance.
Speaker 2: And Blackstone says no laws are binding upon the human
Speaker 2: subject which assault the body or violate its the conscience.
Speaker 2: In the case of the Union Pacific Railway versus Bottsfort,
Speaker 2: the United States Supreme Court said, no right is held
Speaker 2: more sacred or is more carefully guarded by the common
Speaker 2: law than the right of every individual to the possession
Speaker 2: and control of his own person, free from all restraints
Speaker 2: or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestioned authority
Speaker 2: of law. As well said by Judge Cooley, the right
Speaker 2: of one person may be said to be a right
Speaker 2: of complete immunity to be let alone. The inviability in violability,
Speaker 2: like violate right of the person, is as much invaded
Speaker 2: by a compulsory stripping, as by a blow. To compel anyone,
Speaker 2: and especially a woman, to lay bare the body or
Speaker 2: to submit it to a touch of a stranger without
Speaker 2: lawful authority, isn't indignity and assault and a trespass? Woodward
Speaker 2: in nineteen oh three, it may be conceded that the
Speaker 2: legislature has no constitutional right to compel any person to vaccination.
Speaker 2: Supreme Court, Columbia County in New York, not too far
Speaker 2: from where I was, Judge de le beauf said this
Speaker 2: in the Balander case. Now I have charged you that
Speaker 2: the assault which is claimed to have existed here due
Speaker 2: to the forcible vaccination, that is, if it was against
Speaker 2: this man's will, is one which you must consider. And
Speaker 2: the reason of that is this man, in the eyes
Speaker 2: of the law, just as you and I and all
Speaker 2: of us in this courtroom, has the right to be
Speaker 2: let alone. We all have the right to the freedom
Speaker 2: of our persons, and that freedom of our persons may
Speaker 2: not be lawfully invaded. That is a great right. It
Speaker 2: is one of the most important rights we have. And
Speaker 2: if none of this stuff was turned over, why aren't
Speaker 2: we using this as presence and saying instead of bitching
Speaker 2: out and saying that we have a religious exemption. You
Speaker 2: have the law in your favor here. I believe these
Speaker 2: quotations from the court documents indicate. I believe these quotations
Speaker 2: with the court documents indicate clearly that anyone has a
Speaker 2: right to protect himself or his family from the puss
Speaker 2: squirters of the AMA. This is what they were called,
Speaker 2: puss squirters. This is that great science that we call inoculation.
Speaker 2: Over sixty years ago, the famous English physician, doctor Charles
Speaker 2: Creighton said, And of course this is we're talking about
Speaker 2: the nineteen thirties, because they're saying sixty years ago, like
Speaker 2: the ninety forties on the anti vaccinationists have knocked the
Speaker 2: bottom out of the grotesque superstition.
Speaker 1: Oops.
Speaker 2: However it has been revived and needs some more knocks.
Speaker 2: The doctor will not willingly give up such a lucrative
Speaker 2: practice as the use of biol And so parents and
Speaker 2: the public must do something to stop this blood poisoning.
Speaker 2: What then can be done? I have seen a little
Speaker 2: girul upon being vaccinated or inoculated to go to school,
Speaker 2: promptly develop leaky heart valves and die of heart trouble
Speaker 2: about two years later, hardly ten years old. I don't
Speaker 2: believe that either her parents' schoolmates or teacher, or even
Speaker 2: the doctor concerns saw any connection between the vaccination or
Speaker 2: inoculation and the leaky heart valves. But there was a
Speaker 2: connection see my pamphlet blahlah blah. And thousands of such
Speaker 2: deaths are caused every year. What are we going to
Speaker 2: do to stop it? In the whole history of mankind,
Speaker 2: the only adequate answer to tyranny that humanity has ever
Speaker 2: had has been to overthrow, has been the overthrow of
Speaker 2: the tyrant. And the AMA and their cronies have certainly
Speaker 2: been tyrannical in their efforts to sell their decayed animal
Speaker 2: pus biologicals for many years now. Again, remember this is
Speaker 2: a little but this is the same thing going on.
Speaker 2: You could throw a CDC, you can throw at IH,
Speaker 2: you could throw you know, World Health Organization, or or
Speaker 2: this is straight up the UN into this mix and
Speaker 2: replace AMA. I believe that if these efforts at compulsion, coercion,
Speaker 2: or compulsory laws to enforce the use of any kind
Speaker 2: of biological or so called tests of any kind are
Speaker 2: pushed much further, they will lead to trouble. As a
Speaker 2: show in this book the underlying germ theory is a fraud,
Speaker 2: and everything based on it is also fraudulent and should
Speaker 2: be forbidden by law. And when the public fully realizes
Speaker 2: what a colossal fraud the use of these decayed animal
Speaker 2: pus concoctions is, you won't even be able to jail
Speaker 2: a man for shooting a pus doctor who tries to vaccinate, inoculate,
Speaker 2: or test as children. Now, let's read that again. And
Speaker 2: when the public fully realizes what a colossal fraud the
Speaker 2: use of these decayed animal pus concoctions or whatever poison
Speaker 2: in these days that they're using, you won't even be
Speaker 2: able to jail a man for shooting a puss doctor
Speaker 2: who tries to vaccinate, inoculate, or test his children. We
Speaker 2: will outline further on a safe method of controlling infections.
Speaker 2: Doctor Levinson goes on to describe disease as nature's attempt
Speaker 2: to eliminate waste and diseases disease tissues as being due
Speaker 2: to improper living, and suggests plenty of fresh air, the
Speaker 2: best of sanitation, very scantily clothes such as gymnasium costumes
Speaker 2: for everyday use, and a scientific study of diet he
Speaker 2: believes overeating causes an enormous number of disease conditions. What
Speaker 2: does doctor Glyndon say all these ideas that undoubtedly lead
Speaker 2: to better health and longer life than can be obtained
Speaker 2: through serology erum right. It is now over thirty years
Speaker 2: since doctor Leverson expressed the hope that his exposure would
Speaker 2: lead to a serious overhauling of Pastor's work, and it
Speaker 2: should be done by someone who understands physiological chemistry. I
Speaker 2: feel as he seems to. I feel as he seems to,
Speaker 2: that the allopathic mind is hardly to be trusted with
Speaker 2: such important work. Are biologicals injurious and will go down
Speaker 2: to where it says. The fact from which I had
Speaker 2: concluded that tuberculosis may originate traumatically, although very limited number,
Speaker 2: were so positive in nature that I ventured to state
Speaker 2: that the results of tuberculosis inoculation could no longer be
Speaker 2: regarded as necessarily dependent on any property or action possessed
Speaker 2: by the inoculated material, in virtue of its having been
Speaker 2: taken from a tuberculosis individual. The truth of this inference
Speaker 2: has now been established by the experiments of two competitive
Speaker 2: competent observers. Doctor Wilson Fox, Professor of Clinical Medicine. Bah
Speaker 2: blah blah, and the following paragraph contains, yeah, blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: Here it is. So what they're saying here too is
Speaker 2: that's the only way you can get this is do overall.
Speaker 2: Because I've read both these books all the way through.
Speaker 2: You know, there's things that you can do by injection
Speaker 2: that you can't do if it was passing through the
Speaker 2: natural system that the body presents to foreign objects so
Speaker 2: that it doesn't cause problems. But when you eliminate that
Speaker 2: and you go That's why I keep on saying, injections
Speaker 2: are the most unnatural thing you could practice. It's deadly
Speaker 2: no matter what it is. And it depends on that timeframe.
Speaker 2: You don't piece one together with the other. But it
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. It doesn't matter what our limited scope of
Speaker 2: observation is. It matters what the facts of reality are.
Speaker 2: Why come on? So, it says Beshamp, the first to
Speaker 2: make clear the fermentative role of airborne agents was now able,
Speaker 2: according to his own views, to explain the fermentation might
Speaker 2: take place apart from these, for all organisms team with
Speaker 2: minute living entities capable of producing ferments, and that in fact,
Speaker 2: those found in the air he believed to be simply
Speaker 2: the same released from plants and animal forms which they
Speaker 2: have first built up, but from which they are afterwards
Speaker 2: freed by that disruption we call death Beshamp and esther.
Speaker 2: So the condition the environment is what these microzymes are
Speaker 2: responding to. So if there's an upset in their natural
Speaker 2: food source, if some other poison is now changing the
Speaker 2: environment of your body, it's going to act accordingly, and
Speaker 2: that could cause issues. But the way to write that
Speaker 2: ship is to eliminate that toxin and to have proper
Speaker 2: nutrition so you have a resistance to it. And this
Speaker 2: goes right back to doctor Peter Glyndon again, this is
Speaker 2: why you need this membership. But anyway this is going on, says,
Speaker 2: at the risk of being wearisome through repetition, we must
Speaker 2: remind ourselves that of the order in which Beshamp achieved
Speaker 2: his early discoveries. First, he demonstrated that the atmosphere is
Speaker 2: filled with minute living organisms capable of causing fermentation in
Speaker 2: any suitable medium, and that the chemical change in the
Speaker 2: medium is affected by a ferment engendered by them, which
Speaker 2: ferment may well be compared to the gasic juice of
Speaker 2: a stomach, its digestion. It's nutrition that we're watching with fermentation. Secondly,
Speaker 2: he found an ordinary chalk and afterwards in limestone minute
Speaker 2: organisms capable of producing fermentative changes, and showed these to
Speaker 2: bear relation to the infinitesimal granulations he had observed in
Speaker 2: the cells and tissues of plants and animals. He proved
Speaker 2: these granulations, which he named microzyme is, to have independent
Speaker 2: individuality and life, and claimed that they are the antecedents
Speaker 2: of cells. So the cell is not the is not
Speaker 2: the smallest unit of life, so the cell theory is off.
Speaker 2: The genesis of bodily forms the real anatomical incorruptible elements. Thirdly,
Speaker 2: he set forth that the organisms in the air, the
Speaker 2: so called atmospheric germs, are simply either microzymas or their
Speaker 2: evolutionary forms set free by disruption from their former vegetable
Speaker 2: or animal habitat, and that the little bodies in the
Speaker 2: limestone and chalk are the survivors of the living forms
Speaker 2: of past ages immortal microzyma. Fourthly, he claimed that at
Speaker 2: the present time, microzyme is constantly developed to the low
Speaker 2: type of living organisms that go by the name of bacteria.
Speaker 2: They are creating what it is that they need to be.
Speaker 2: They're generating it so that they can thrive in whatever
Speaker 2: environment they're in. But when you change that vironment, it
Speaker 2: changed to the micro sima. So you're like, oh, I
Speaker 2: got this this thing. It's from you. You gave it
Speaker 2: to me that. No, it happened from within. Disease is
Speaker 2: born from within, we have all But what causes that
Speaker 2: is the disruption in the environment of that which is
Speaker 2: something that you could definitely control, and if you're not
Speaker 2: paying attention to it, it'll turn sideways.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: We have already perfessionally studied the rigid experiments that established
Speaker 2: pretty sharpest views of the fermentech fermentative role of airborne
Speaker 2: organisms and those found in chalk. Let Us now follow
Speaker 2: a few of the innumerable experiments he carried out in
Speaker 2: the establishment of his other conclusions. His work was so
Speaker 2: incessant and his observation is so prolific that they can
Speaker 2: only be summarized, and no attempt can be made to
Speaker 2: trace the exact chronological order of the experiments upon which
Speaker 2: he based his opinions. At the very early stage of
Speaker 2: his research researches, he demonstrated with the professor esther that
Speaker 2: air need have nothing to do with the appearance of
Speaker 2: bacteria in the substance of tissues. Further, these investigators established
Speaker 2: the independent vitality of microzymas of certain tissues, certain glands,
Speaker 2: and so forth, so they're different from one tissue to
Speaker 2: the next within the same body and so forth. By
Speaker 2: showing that these minute granules act like organized ferments, and
Speaker 2: that they can develop into bacteria passing through the certain
Speaker 2: intermediary stages which they described. These intermediate stages having been
Speaker 2: regarded by many authorities as different species, we have seen
Speaker 2: that the basic solution of the whole mystery for Bechamp
Speaker 2: was his discovery of the little bodies in chalk, which
Speaker 2: possess the power of inverting sugar orcane, sugar liquefying stars,
Speaker 2: and otherwise proving themselves agents of fermentation. The strata in
Speaker 2: which he found them were regarded by geologists as being
Speaker 2: at least eleven million years old, and they shot questioned
Speaker 2: whether the little bodies he had named Microzyma creata could
Speaker 2: really be the surviving remains of the fauna and flora
Speaker 2: of such long past ages. Not having centuries at his
Speaker 2: disposal to test the problem. He determined to see for
Speaker 2: himself what would remain now at this present time of
Speaker 2: a body buried with strict precautions. He knew that in
Speaker 2: the ordinary way, an interred corpse was soon reduced to dust,
Speaker 2: unless embalmed or subjected to a very low temperature, in
Speaker 2: which cases the check to decomposition would be explained by
Speaker 2: the inherent granules the microzymas becoming dormant. At the beginning
Speaker 2: of eighteen sixty eight, he therefore took the carc So
Speaker 2: this is what microzymas do. They build up life in
Speaker 2: the day, they repurpose it, but they're still there after
Speaker 2: the fact. So are we are microzymas? Is this just
Speaker 2: what they built for us? A little vessel for them?
Speaker 2: At the beginning of eighteen sixty eight, We therefore took
Speaker 2: the carcass of a kitten and laid it in a
Speaker 2: bed of pure carbonate of lime, especially prepared and creusodd,
Speaker 2: while a much thicker layer covered the body the hole.
Speaker 2: The hole was placed in a glass jar, the open
Speaker 2: top of which was closed by several sheets of paper,
Speaker 2: placed in such a way that air would be continually
Speaker 2: renewed without permitting the intrusion of dust or organisms. This
Speaker 2: was left on a shelf in Beachamp's laboratory until the
Speaker 2: end of the year eighteen seventy four. The upper bed
Speaker 2: of carbonate lime was then removed and proved to be
Speaker 2: entirely silable and hydrochloric acid. Some centimeters further down there
Speaker 2: were to be found only some fragments of bone and
Speaker 2: dry matter. Not the slightest smell was perceptible, nor was
Speaker 2: the carbonate of lime discolored. This artificial chalk was as
Speaker 2: white as ordinary chalk, and except for the microscopics, crystals
Speaker 2: of Ergant Knight found in the precipitated carbonate of lime
Speaker 2: indistinguishable from it, and showed under the microscope brilliant molecules
Speaker 2: quote unquote, such as those seen in the chalk of sins.
Speaker 2: One part of this carbonate of lime was then placed
Speaker 2: in creosoded stars and another part in creosodid sweetened water.
Speaker 2: Fermentation took place, just as ordinary chalk had been used,
Speaker 2: but more actively. Microzymes were not seen in the upper
Speaker 2: stratum of the carbonate of lime, but in that portion
Speaker 2: where the kitten's body had rested. They swarmed in their
Speaker 2: thousands in each microscopic field. After filtering the carbonate of
Speaker 2: lime through the silk and sieve, it was taken up
Speaker 2: with dilute hydrochloric acid and bes shomp thereby succeeded in
Speaker 2: separating the microzymas which had been made visible by the microscope.
Speaker 2: His microscope. What you said, what just happened? Oh wow?
Speaker 2: That jumped far. At the end of this speriment, which
Speaker 2: had continued for over six and a half years, base
Speaker 2: Shop followed it with another which lasted seven years to
Speaker 2: meet the possible criticism that the body of the kitten
Speaker 2: had been the prey of germs of the air, which
Speaker 2: might have been carried in its hair or admitted into
Speaker 2: its lungs or by breathing about by breathing went alive,
Speaker 2: or into its intestinal canal. Based Shop now employed more
Speaker 2: rigid precautions. This time, in addition to burying the whole
Speaker 2: carcass of the kitten, he also buried in one case
Speaker 2: a cat's liver and another heart, lung, skinneys, blah blah blah.
Speaker 2: These viscera had been plunged into carbolic acid the moment
Speaker 2: they had been detached from the slaughtered animal. This experiment
Speaker 2: that commenced in the climate of Montpelier in the month
Speaker 2: of June eighteen seventy five, had to be transported to
Speaker 2: Lily at the end of August seventy six, and was
Speaker 2: terminated there in August eighty two, my birthday month. Owing
Speaker 2: to the temperature climate of Lily very different from that
Speaker 2: of the Montpelier, which for the great part of the
Speaker 2: year is almost subtropical, the destruction of the body was
Speaker 2: much less advanced in this later experiment than it had
Speaker 2: been in the previous one. All the same, in the
Speaker 2: beds of the carbonate of lime near the mains, in
Speaker 2: one of the cases the whole kitten, and in the
Speaker 2: other cases of the viscera microzymas swarmed, and there were
Speaker 2: also well formed bacteria. Moreover, the chalk was impregnated with
Speaker 2: organic matter, which colored it a yellow brown and yellowish brown,
Speaker 2: but the whole was orderless orderless. In these two experiments,
Speaker 2: Bechamp found convincing confirmation of views that had been already
Speaker 2: suggested to him by many other observations. To begin with,
Speaker 2: they supported his belief that the little bodies the micro
Speaker 2: zymas of natural chalk are the living remains of the
Speaker 2: plant and animal forms, of which in past ages they
Speaker 2: were the constructive, constructive cellular elements they build it. It
Speaker 2: was shown that after the death of an organism, itself disappear,
Speaker 2: but in their place remain myriads of molecular littercnulations or microzymas.
Speaker 2: Here was remarkable proof of the imperishability of these builders
Speaker 2: of living forms. Neither is the fact of their own
Speaker 2: independent life denied by a longevity under conditions that would
Speaker 2: bar them from nutrition throughout the immense periods. Since we
Speaker 2: find prolonged abstination from food to be possible even in
Speaker 2: the animal world among hibernating creatures, while the naturals can
Speaker 2: detail many more cases among minute organisms, for instance pond
Speaker 2: dwellers which fast for indefinite intervals when deprived of water
Speaker 2: their natural habitat, and fern spores, which also are known
Speaker 2: to retain vitality that may lie dormant for many years,
Speaker 2: thus whether confined within some animal or vegetable body, or
Speaker 2: freed from freed by the disruption of plant animal forms,
Speaker 2: meaning it's no longer there. The microzymas, according to by Shop,
Speaker 2: were proved capable of preserving vitality in a dormant day.
Speaker 2: Even though the periods of past men's records, it would
Speaker 2: still be possible for different microzymas to possess varying degrees
Speaker 2: of vitality. For, as we shall see, Bechamp found differences
Speaker 2: between the microzymas of various species and oregons. But over
Speaker 2: and above finding that the elements of the cells can
Speaker 2: live on indefinitely after the disruption of the plant or
Speaker 2: animal bodies that they originally built up, he considered that
Speaker 2: he had obtained convincing evidence of their ability to develop
Speaker 2: into the life forms known as bacteria. Where do they
Speaker 2: come from? They come from within you? What makes them?
Speaker 2: The very things that make up you? What turns them
Speaker 2: against you? You turned against them. You credit up your system,
Speaker 2: or somebody else credit up your system, or you got
Speaker 2: an injection full of poison. If not, where did these
Speaker 2: come from? In the case of the buried viscera, Even
Speaker 2: if airborne germs were not completely excluded in the case
Speaker 2: of the kitten's body, the utmost precaution had been taken
Speaker 2: to exclude them. In the case of the burial of
Speaker 2: the inner organs. Yet Bechamp found that the microzymas of
Speaker 2: the viscera as well as those of the whole kit,
Speaker 2: and had evolved into associated microzymis, chaplets of microzymis, and
Speaker 2: finally into fine bacteria. That's the pleamorphism among which the
Speaker 2: Bacterium capitatum appeared in the center of the great piece
Speaker 2: of flesh. Here Beachamp saw how wrong first that the
Speaker 2: great naturalist Cuvier, and after him Pasture had been in assuming.
Speaker 2: Now this is their assumption in the pasture, that any
Speaker 2: part whatever, being separated from the mass of the of
Speaker 2: an animal is by the fact transformed into the order
Speaker 2: of dead substances, and is thereby essentially changed. By Bechamp's researches,
Speaker 2: it was seeing that separate parts of a body maintained
Speaker 2: some degree of independent life, a belief held by certain
Speaker 2: modern experimenters, who, unlike Bechamp, fail to provide an explanation.
Speaker 2: His experiment showed the professor how it is that bacteria
Speaker 2: may be found in Earth where corpses have been buried,
Speaker 2: and also in maneuvered lands and among surroundings of decaying vegetation.
Speaker 2: According to him, bacteria are not specifically created organisms mysteriously
Speaker 2: appearing in the atmosphere, but they are the evolutionary forms
Speaker 2: of microzymas which build up the cells of plants and animals.
Speaker 2: After the death of these latter, the bacteria, by their
Speaker 2: nutritive processes processes bring about the disruption or in other words,
Speaker 2: the decomposition of the plant or animal, resulting in a
Speaker 2: return to forms approximating to microzymas, like the dust to dust.
Speaker 2: Right because they're tiny little granules? Jeez, is this biblical
Speaker 2: might be? Thus Bechamp taught that every living being has
Speaker 2: arisen from the micma, and also that let me say
Speaker 2: that again. Thus Bechamp taught that every living being, plant
Speaker 2: and animal has arisen from the microzyma, and also that
Speaker 2: every living being is reducible to a microzyma, the second
Speaker 2: axiom of his of his he says, accounts for the
Speaker 2: disappearance of bacteria in the earlier experiment. For just as
Speaker 2: microzymas have evolved, may evolve into bacteria, so, according to
Speaker 2: his teachings, bacteria by an inverse process may be reduced
Speaker 2: to the pristine simplicity of the microzyma. Beschamp believed this
Speaker 2: to have happened in the earlier case, when the destruction
Speaker 2: of the Kitton's carcass was so much more complete than
Speaker 2: in the second case, when the temper climate of lily
Speaker 2: had prolonged the process of decomposition. Many, indeed were the
Speaker 2: lessons Many, indeed were lessons fatigable worker learned from these
Speaker 2: two series of observations. I always feel like a retugem,
Speaker 2: and I don't want to recognize the work because I
Speaker 2: read so much that the microzymis are the only non
Speaker 2: transitory elements of the organism persisting after the death of
Speaker 2: the latter and forming bacteria. That there is produced in
Speaker 2: the organisms of all living beans, including man, in some
Speaker 2: part and a given moment, alcohol, acetic acid, and other
Speaker 2: compounds that are normal products of the activity of organized ferments,
Speaker 2: And that there is no other natural cause of this
Speaker 2: production than the normal microzymas of the organism. The presence
Speaker 2: of alcohol, of acetic acid, etc. In the tissues reveals
Speaker 2: one of the causes independent of the phenomenon of oxidation,
Speaker 2: of the disappearance of sugar in the organism and of
Speaker 2: the disappearance of the glucagetic matters, and that which Dumas
Speaker 2: called the respiratory foods. Three, that without the concurrence of
Speaker 2: any outside influence accept a suitable temperature, fermentation will go
Speaker 2: on in a part withdrawn from an animal such as
Speaker 2: the egg, milk, liver, muscle, urine, or in the case
Speaker 2: of plants. Some think this is what I think about
Speaker 2: when I read this when of apple falls and hits
Speaker 2: the ground and it gets that bruising. That bruising is
Speaker 2: the activation of the microzyma to decide to decompose, it
Speaker 2: starts to ferment it right, It's that it's that upset
Speaker 2: in its environment. It's that shock, that that bruising that
Speaker 2: occurs that makes it start to understand that it's okay, well,
Speaker 2: it's time to change our nutrition and base and our
Speaker 2: activity and our function. And that's the same thing with
Speaker 2: a disease. It's happening because there's enough that's an upset
Speaker 2: in what the microzyma are happily doing without a care
Speaker 2: in the world until something disrupts them. That without the
Speaker 2: concurrence of any outside influence except the suitable temperatre I
Speaker 2: Alreaders say that, yeah, suitable temperature fermentation will go and
Speaker 2: the part with drawn from an animal such as the egg, milk,
Speaker 2: livered muscle, urine, or in the case of plants, a
Speaker 2: germinating seed or in a fruit which ripens when detached
Speaker 2: from the tree, et cetera. The fermentable matter that disappears
Speaker 2: earliest in an organ after death is the glucose, that sugar,
Speaker 2: gleucagenic matter, or some other of the compounds called carbohydrates,
Speaker 2: that is to say, a respiratory food. And the new
Speaker 2: compounds that appear are the same as those produced in
Speaker 2: the alcoholic, lactic, and beteric fermentations of the laboratory or
Speaker 2: during life alcohol acetic acid, lacticate it or sarcalactic acid in.
Speaker 2: People are going to say that bacteria, well, the bad
Speaker 2: ones are the ani anaerobic, which means they don't need air,
Speaker 2: and then the aerobic are the good. It's all a
Speaker 2: condition based on what's going on with the microzyma that
Speaker 2: it is. It is once again proved that the cause
Speaker 2: of composition after death is the same within the organism
Speaker 2: as that which acts under other conditions during life. Namely,
Speaker 2: microzyme is capable of becoming bacteria by evolution, that the
Speaker 2: microzymas after or before their evolution into bacteria only attack
Speaker 2: albuminoid or gelatinous matter after the destruction. After the destruction
Speaker 2: of the matters called carbohydrates, that the microzymas and bacteria
Speaker 2: having affected the transformations before mentioned, do not die in
Speaker 2: a closed apparatus in the absence of oxygen. Okay, there
Speaker 2: we go. They're talking about the aneote, you know, so
Speaker 2: that because if it did, if it did die, then
Speaker 2: it's like, well, that was the aerobic one. The anaerobic
Speaker 2: ones everyone's to They go into a state of rest,
Speaker 2: as does the beer yeast in an environment of the
Speaker 2: products of the decomposition of the sugar, which products it formed.
Speaker 2: It is only under certain conditions, particularly in the presence
Speaker 2: of oxygen, as in the experiment on the kitten buried
Speaker 2: in the carbonate of lime, etc. That the same microzymas
Speaker 2: of bacteria affect the definite destruction of vegetable or animal matter,
Speaker 2: reducing it to carbonic acid, which you're talking about like
Speaker 2: carbonation water, nitrogen or simple nitrogenous compounds, or even into
Speaker 2: nitric acid or other nitrates. That it is in this
Speaker 2: way that the necessary destruction of the organic matter of
Speaker 2: an organism is not left to chance to causes foreign
Speaker 2: to that organism, and that when everything else has disappeared,
Speaker 2: bacteria and finally microzymas resulting from their reversion remain as
Speaker 2: evidence that there was nothing of what was primarily living
Speaker 2: except themselves in the perished organism. And these microzymas, which
Speaker 2: appear to us as the remains or residue of that
Speaker 2: which had lived, still possess some activity of the specific
Speaker 2: kind that they possessed during the life of the destroyed being.
Speaker 2: It is thus that the microzymas and bacteria that remained
Speaker 2: from the corpse of the kitten were not absolutely identical
Speaker 2: with those of the liver, or the heart, or the
Speaker 2: lung or the kidney. The professor continued, I do not
Speaker 2: mean to infer that the destruction that in the destruction
Speaker 2: affected in the open air, on the surface of the ground,
Speaker 2: or other causes do not occur to hasten it. I
Speaker 2: have never denied that the so called germs of the
Speaker 2: error or other causes are contributed, contributory so other factors,
Speaker 2: right not, This whole one causal thing is also a
Speaker 2: big problem, one cause, one solution. Talking about disease and vaccination,
Speaker 2: I only say that these germs in these causes have
Speaker 2: not been expressly created for the purpose for that purpose,
Speaker 2: and that the so called germs and atmospheric dusts are
Speaker 2: nothing else than the microzymas from organisms destroyed by the
Speaker 2: mechanism I have just explained, and whose destructive influence is
Speaker 2: added to that of the microzymas, belonging to the being
Speaker 2: in process of destruction the additive factor. But in the
Speaker 2: atmospheric dust there are only sorry. But in the atmospheric
Speaker 2: dust there are own, my god, But in the atmospheric
Speaker 2: dust there are not only the microzymas, the spores of
Speaker 2: the entire microscopic flora may intrude, as well as all
Speaker 2: the molds that may be born of these sports. So
Speaker 2: he's right now making a distinction between microzymas and spores.
Speaker 2: You see that, because he's talking about the flora spores
Speaker 2: you talking about fungal you know, mushrooms and spores, microzymas
Speaker 2: being different. It must not be supposed that Bechamp founded
Speaker 2: such manifold views upon just two series of observations from
Speaker 2: the data of his beacon experiment. He never sees his
Speaker 2: arduous work in connection with micro organisms. Together with Professor Ester,
Speaker 2: he instituted many experiments upon interorganisms extracted from fail fetuses
Speaker 2: obtained as a result of abortions, said he again. Here again,
Speaker 2: they had overwhelming proof of bacterial evolution from normal inherent particles.
Speaker 2: For while they would find bacteria in the interiors, the
Speaker 2: surrounding liquids, which had been especially prepared as culture media,
Speaker 2: would be absolutely free from such organisms. All right, we're
Speaker 2: gonna move up to there's a lot of good stuff here,
Speaker 2: but I'm gonna try to bring us up a little
Speaker 2: bit here Beichamp talking about Yeah. From start, he warned
Speaker 2: the world against being misled by two facillaists and judgments.
Speaker 2: As early as in eighteen sixty nine he wrote entyphoed
Speaker 2: fever in gangren and athrax. The existence had been proved
Speaker 2: of bacteria in the issues and in the blood, and
Speaker 2: one was very much disposed to take them for granted
Speaker 2: as cases of ordinary parasitism. It is evident, after what
Speaker 2: we have said, that instead of maintaining that the affection
Speaker 2: has had as its origin and cause the introduction into
Speaker 2: the organism of foreign germs with their consequent action, one
Speaker 2: should affirm that one is dealing here with the alteration
Speaker 2: of the functions of the microzymas, and alteration indicated by
Speaker 2: the change that has taken place in their form. Once again,
Speaker 2: you mess up the environment in yourself, the microzymes change
Speaker 2: what they're doing, and then you have the scenes called
Speaker 2: illness disease. Yeah, he's listen to this. For instance, according
Speaker 2: to pasteur Or, the body is nothing more than an
Speaker 2: inert mass, a mere chemical complex. Remember chemicals waiting to
Speaker 2: break that Doctor Peter Glinton talks about this is the
Speaker 2: past your thought process. That's still an allopathy, a mere
Speaker 2: chemical complex, which while in a state of health, he
Speaker 2: maintained to be immune against the invasion of foreign organisms.
Speaker 2: He seems never to have realized that this belief contradicts
Speaker 2: the germ theory of disease originally putford by Kircher and Raspiel,
Speaker 2: which he and Devane had been so quickly and adopting.
Speaker 2: How can foreign organisms originate disease in the body when,
Speaker 2: according to Pastor, they cannot find entry into the self
Speaker 2: same body until after disease has set in. Anue with
Speaker 2: a sense of humor would have noticed an amazing and
Speaker 2: amusing discrepancy in such a contention. So remember, if you're
Speaker 2: if you're healthy, it's a lot you have a lot
Speaker 2: more resistance to these changes occurring. If you have everything
Speaker 2: your body needs to be strengthened make your microzyme as happy.
Speaker 2: But how can foreign organisms organisms originate disease in the body,
Speaker 2: According to past, sure when they cannot find entry into
Speaker 2: the self same body until after disease has set in.
Speaker 2: I said, I need to go to three hundred. Okay,
Speaker 2: bring it up. Oh what was that? All right, we'll
Speaker 2: go back to that one. Jesus, all right, here we go. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: So this is talking about the whole entire Uh this
Speaker 2: is this is the section on rabies. But rabies itself
Speaker 2: was supposedly a successful when you look at the the
Speaker 2: actual write ups, some what actually occurred. People are being
Speaker 2: killed by inoculation and they just call that a success.
Speaker 2: We're gonna stop there because I'm gonna have more problems
Speaker 2: with this Internet and I'm gonna have to yell at
Speaker 2: them and fight with them and then do something else
Speaker 2: that's horrible to them. Just kidding, but yeah, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: try to get a different rep that doesn't tell me
Speaker 2: it's my fault. And uh yeah, anyway, so let's let's
Speaker 2: go ahead and take a look here while we are
Speaker 2: on if you are on Rumble, heck, if you're on
Speaker 2: Rumble or if you're on Brady on or if you're
Speaker 2: on Good Old Fashion, I don't know. Let's the other
Speaker 2: on I'm on I don't remember. Oh yeah, FTG Media.
Speaker 2: Look into description. I'm gonna use this one here as
Speaker 2: my reference, as my example, and when you go here
Speaker 2: you'll see the gifts and good dot com backslash ball bussers.
Speaker 2: I'm at the mercy of this Internet. I hate the service.
Speaker 2: I can't stand them. They're destroying our freaking broadcast. Now
Speaker 2: nobody's gonna watch us with graininess. It was complete waste
Speaker 2: of fucking time and I only did this out of
Speaker 2: spite to continue on. Otherwise I should just smash the
Speaker 2: fucking computer with a hammer, but I didn't, and I'm
Speaker 2: actually little mad at myself for not being that psychotic,
Speaker 2: because it's all deserving. Anyway, if you click on here
Speaker 2: give some good dot com flax slush ball busters, you
Speaker 2: will see that there's a way to support the way
Speaker 2: to support the computer drive where I want to say
Speaker 2: four fifty away from the total. And that's hoping that
Speaker 2: the rest of the components that I started pricing starting
Speaker 2: this weekend haven't gone up crazy now that the port
Speaker 2: thing is over and those little prima donnas got their
Speaker 2: got their way after you know, grinding everything to a halt.
Speaker 2: They said it costs I don't know what this means.
Speaker 2: I don't know what this figure means, but it said
Speaker 2: it costs six billion dollars a day for them be
Speaker 2: shut down. No idea with that, with that conceptualizes is
Speaker 2: that a permanent loss? Is that a temporary loss until
Speaker 2: things get back on order. I don't even know what
Speaker 2: the hell they're talking about, but there's that they should
Speaker 2: be already, you know, lynched for grinding the country to
Speaker 2: a halt for twelve percent twelve percent increase in their
Speaker 2: wages because they were offered fifty and they went on
Speaker 2: strike fifty percent increase in over the six years or
Speaker 2: something like that. So the actually twelve percent was what's
Speaker 2: shutting down the country. The guy who's the head of
Speaker 2: the longshoreman should have his head thrown through the windshield
Speaker 2: of his own bentley. But I'm sure it wasn't him
Speaker 2: who was behind it all, because it's never the people
Speaker 2: that they put out front. But anyway, if you want
Speaker 2: to help out with the with the give some God
Speaker 2: dot com, it's right here. Give some go dot com
Speaker 2: backslash ball busters, and that will help. Let's get to
Speaker 2: this computer so that I can be Like I said,
Speaker 2: if it wasn't for the bios hack, I'd be able
Speaker 2: to change anything on the Internet I want. But it
Speaker 2: won't even let me access on this computer. It obliterates
Speaker 2: the the way that you go in to change your
Speaker 2: funk your Internet. So the one that was already on
Speaker 2: there is the only one I can use. And it's
Speaker 2: terrible and it's destroying, it's destroying broadcasts. That's one of
Speaker 2: the many problems that this computer has. And I'm a
Speaker 2: little sick of it now. It's gonna once I once
Speaker 2: I pull this off, this computer off here, like once
Speaker 2: the time has come for us to use the new
Speaker 2: computer that I put together, Like when we get to
Speaker 2: that day, this one will be useless again because I'm
Speaker 2: not gonna keep century a link a arm and I
Speaker 2: want everybody to put another Internet to it, so it'll
Speaker 2: just be a box without Internet. Sucks so bad. But anyway,
Speaker 2: there to go and what else I was gonna show you?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I haven't done this in a while. I
Speaker 2: don't why I don't. But let's go to my Let's
Speaker 2: go to my You can go to Patreon here if
Speaker 2: you want to get on there and help out support
Speaker 2: that way. But in doctor Peter Glidden lead big Farm
Speaker 2: behind Code Ballbusters for fifty percent off, I'm telling you
Speaker 2: he's more on him and doctor Mons are more on
Speaker 2: point about health than anybody else you've ever encountered in
Speaker 2: your life. And I'm showing you the evidence to prove that,
Speaker 2: and I'm showing you the history of the lies as
Speaker 2: we go for the go forward and continue to and
Speaker 2: something called those survey call is calling me. I'm certainly
Speaker 2: not answering that piece of shit because it's probably them
Speaker 2: asking me how do we do? Yeah, you pissed me
Speaker 2: off quite well, thank you. So go to this where
Speaker 2: it says simper fryllc dot com. It's not going to
Speaker 2: be on the Brighty on one. I think I cut
Speaker 2: it short, but it's s E M P E R
Speaker 2: f R y l l C dot com.
Speaker 1: Click that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, fuck off?
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 2: So when you get here, first of all, fan favorite
Speaker 2: is the generic keep on code for everybody that's only
Speaker 2: five percent off. Code Victory with a capital V is
Speaker 2: going to give you eleven percent off. If you're a
Speaker 2: ball Busser's viewer. Okay, you can go right from this
Speaker 2: site to go to doctor Peter Glidden's site, and then
Speaker 2: you can use ball bussers all lowercase to get fifty
Speaker 2: percent off his membership and you save an extra one
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty dollars off of it when you go
Speaker 2: for the year. Okay, doctor Monzo's book, Let me show
Speaker 2: you something right here. This is the coupon code for
Speaker 2: that particular one, and you get fifteen percent off his
Speaker 2: book and other things on his site. Okay, the asure
Speaker 2: well which people have asked me and makes to show
Speaker 2: you and again like what was that again? Okay, comparatively
Speaker 2: whole food vitamin style to the tangy tangarine, YadA, YadA, YadA,
Speaker 2: to make up the ninety right the whole food my
Speaker 2: multivitamin which is a swim right here, the full acumic
Speaker 2: acid which is right here, and the IP six will
Speaker 2: be you're gonna want this to the core copper. But
Speaker 2: the IP six I think might have to hit a
Speaker 2: load more once. It should be after that turmeric.
Speaker 1: No, it's in here.
Speaker 2: There, it is, so the IP six right here, okay,
Speaker 2: and that will get rid of the heavy metal well,
Speaker 2: the additional iron that's in your in your tissues causing
Speaker 2: the oxidative stress. It will give you the calcium magnesium,
Speaker 2: YadA YadA that the o CEOFX would give you. And
Speaker 2: then those three at adding four would be for me.
Speaker 2: I would grab the core copper to have extra copper
Speaker 2: because we're usually pretty depleted on that. And then the
Speaker 2: full vocumic acid is pretty much those the sixty six
Speaker 2: percent of your of your nutrients there right from the
Speaker 2: from the full v a chemic acid. All right, So
Speaker 2: there you have it now, you know, but I haven't
Speaker 2: talked about this in a long time. This is my book.
Speaker 2: You click this right here now, you can go to
Speaker 2: Barnes right from this link, you can go to Amazon.
Speaker 2: Right from that link, you can go to Kobo. You
Speaker 2: can go to Lulu. These two will last two are
Speaker 2: electronic only. But if you scroll all the way down
Speaker 2: and you want to have a copy from me signed,
Speaker 2: then you click one of these little dotters here, okay,
Speaker 2: and you get a little bit cheaper for me and
Speaker 2: I sign it.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: There's gonna be shipping obviously for me, but I'm not
Speaker 2: Amazon Prime. But you also pay for seventy bucks a
Speaker 2: month or whatever.
Speaker 1: It is.
Speaker 2: So there you go. All right, the book is most
Speaker 2: certainly important. It's gonna it's like this. All this stuff
Speaker 2: is going to tie into it. The things that I
Speaker 2: brought up about the the Freemasons, the infiltration John Robison's
Speaker 2: book Proofs of Conspiracy, the stuff about William Moore, I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: Samuel Morris, the guy who was pointing the finger at
Speaker 2: the Jesuits coming over and infiltrating our country. All this
Speaker 2: stuff is tied into the frankest and zionis thing that's
Speaker 2: occurring at the same time. Eugenics and Dorwinism, who are
Speaker 2: all un tied into the Freemasons, are developing the culture
Speaker 2: around this tossile takeover that they're slowly building over this
Speaker 2: over the centuries, right or over the decades. And this
Speaker 2: is what has poison medicine, commercialized it, corporatized it, and
Speaker 2: made it into a pseudoscience. All this is important because
Speaker 2: this is gonna be This is the foundation book. The
Speaker 2: next one that comes out is gonna be like a
Speaker 2: like a masterclass. All right, get the details that you need,
Speaker 2: because then it all makes sense. This will be the
Speaker 2: biggest reference book you've ever had. All Right, get it,
Speaker 2: And I will give out a copy of the Kindle
Speaker 2: version for free. Maybe next week. Okay, all right,