Speaker 1: I want to talk, because everyone wants to talk. I
Speaker 1: want to talk, and up start screaming fifty five KRC.
Speaker 2: Eight oh six here at fifty five kr CD talk station.
Speaker 2: Bryan Time, I was swishing everyone a very happy Tuesday.
Speaker 2: Always extra special time to be listening to the fifty
Speaker 2: five KRS Morning Show because we get to talk with Breitbart,
Speaker 2: get the inside scoop, b R E I T B
Speaker 2: A r T dot com, book Market. Strongly encourage you
Speaker 2: to do that real reporting and of course it does
Speaker 2: not have that left leaning narrative that you get from
Speaker 2: the mainstream media. Welcome back to the fifty five KRSE
Speaker 2: Morning Show, Joel, Paul Lockett's always great having you on
Speaker 2: the program.
Speaker 1: Joel, Joel, there he is. Can you hear me? Yes,
Speaker 1: I can hear you. Okay, there we go.
Speaker 2: Uh So we're in the last final week of the election,
Speaker 2: and I guess it's not working. And what it is
Speaker 2: is the fact that the Kamala Harris campaign obviously has
Speaker 2: tried to do the pull of Biden and hide when
Speaker 2: she is out and about answering questions. She ducks, dips,
Speaker 2: dodge dives and ducks, you know, five d to dodgeball
Speaker 2: in terms of what her prior platforms and policies are,
Speaker 2: and she deflects from what she used to say and
Speaker 2: pretty much provide you with absolutely nothing by way of
Speaker 2: substantd response, blurting inanities. And Walter her a vice presidential candidate,
Speaker 2: not exactly great himself on the issues, but what do
Speaker 2: they do. They keep focusing and reporting on Trump and
Speaker 2: pointing fingers in Trump and just reduced him to Adolf Hitler.
Speaker 2: That's not working either, is it, Joel.
Speaker 1: We actually don't know if it's working. It might be working,
Speaker 1: I don't think it works in a general sense because
Speaker 1: when you are saying that your opponent is literally Adolf
Speaker 1: Hitler and his supporters are Hitler or Nazi, you're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to govern. And we saw that
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden. He ran in twenty twenty one of
Speaker 1: the Fine People Hoax and essentially did the same thing
Speaker 1: that Kamala Harris is doing now, and when he got
Speaker 1: to office, he found there was very little good will
Speaker 1: left for him to draw upon in governing the country.
Speaker 1: He did get the bipartisan Infrastructure Bill, but that's something
Speaker 1: Republicans wanted anyway. A lot of pork in that for
Speaker 1: various politicians and so forth. Mitch McConnell, who had opposed
Speaker 1: a trillion dollar infrastructure bill when Trump was president, suddenly
Speaker 1: found reasons to like it when Biden was president. But
Speaker 1: Biden didn't get very much done on a bipartisan basis,
Speaker 1: and he failed over four years largely because he had
Speaker 1: created this climate of division. He used the word unity
Speaker 1: eight times in his inaugural aggress but he couldn't do
Speaker 1: anything to create it because he had already smeared his
Speaker 1: opponents as Nazis. So what Kamala Harris is doing is
Speaker 1: out of that playbook. It does work at times. And look,
Speaker 1: the main case against Donald Trump is that he's divisive. Yeah, now,
Speaker 1: I'll give you. I'll give him credit. Over the last month,
Speaker 1: maybe six weeks, Donald Trump has been extraordinarily disciplined. He
Speaker 1: has not insulted people, he has not said crazy things.
Speaker 1: He has actually been on message. He's been very positive,
Speaker 1: positive about the country, reaching out to different people. He's
Speaker 1: done a really fantastic job. So what they've done is
Speaker 1: they decided in advance to smear Trump as a Nazi
Speaker 1: at this rally, just because it happened at Medicine Square Garden, you.
Speaker 2: Know, like Clinton had a rally as well. Yeah, yeah, you.
Speaker 1: Know, it's so desperate. But then there was a comedian
Speaker 1: at the Routley. I know you're going to go there
Speaker 1: that Yeah, okay. How many people spoke Joel at that convention?
Speaker 1: How many people who are running for office, how many
Speaker 1: people who might be in the cabinet?
Speaker 2: Do you hear any reporting on what they had to say? No,
Speaker 2: they gravitate towards one rude, obnoxious comedian who has no
Speaker 2: impact whatsoever on a campaign. It's just that he was
Speaker 2: invited to speak and he made a stupid joke and
Speaker 2: insulted people. But that cannot be attributed to the Trump
Speaker 2: folks or the Trump camp or any campaign platform they're
Speaker 2: running on. That's how desperate they are to find something
Speaker 2: bad to say about Trump. They got to deviate over
Speaker 2: to the one person in the room that didn't even matter.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't know that he didn't matter. I mean
Speaker 1: he has an audience, and may it may even have
Speaker 1: been a positive because he'd you know, look Tony Hinchcliffe.
Speaker 1: I watch his videos on Facebook. I mean when you
Speaker 1: watch Tony, when you watch the Kill Tony Show, you're
Speaker 1: watching an insult comic and his jokes are offensive, and
Speaker 1: that's why he's funny. That's why people watch him because
Speaker 1: he says things are not allowed to.
Speaker 2: Say, like Don Rickles used to be yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: Like Don Rickles and so forth. And he you know,
Speaker 1: I live in La Okay. I have friends who are
Speaker 1: comedians and they say ridiculous things, and that's why people
Speaker 1: pay money to go see them, including the people who
Speaker 1: are pretending to be outraged. Today, Tony Hankscliff spoke at
Speaker 1: the beginning of a six hour event. He was a
Speaker 1: warm up act, and the joke he told that everyone's
Speaker 1: defended by about Puerto Rico, not about Puerto Ricans, but
Speaker 1: about Puerto Rico. It didn't land. I mean, people didn't
Speaker 1: like it. You can hear the audience grown. And he
Speaker 1: made fun of himself after that for telling a bad joke,
Speaker 1: and he moved on and he got the audience back
Speaker 1: after a few more jokes. But the media are turning
Speaker 1: this into an attack not just on Trump but also
Speaker 1: on Trump supporters. CNN falsely claiming that the audience liked
Speaker 1: the joke. You can actually hear the audio for himself
Speaker 1: for yourself if you want it's on CSPAN. Look, we
Speaker 1: don't know if this works or not. The election is
Speaker 1: right now a mystery. It's a black box. People are
Speaker 1: voting there, putting ballots in dropboxes or the mail, or
Speaker 1: they're planning to go on election day. We just don't know.
Speaker 1: It's really a gut check at this point for the electorate.
Speaker 1: I thought that Donald Trump was home free heading out
Speaker 1: to this weekend, and I thought the Medicine Square Garden
Speaker 1: rally was a big success. But the Democrats have united
Speaker 1: around the idea that this was a Nazi rally. And
Speaker 1: as crazy as crazy as it sounds to you and me,
Speaker 1: the reason it works for Democrats isn't that people believe it. Okay,
Speaker 1: you know, you and I are incredulous that anyone would
Speaker 1: think that a bad joke by a comedian would mean
Speaker 1: that Trump is a Nazi. I mean, if that were
Speaker 1: the case, then Hollywood is, you know, the Nazi capital
Speaker 1: of the world. But the reason it works is it
Speaker 1: shows Democrats that their party is willing to fight. If
Speaker 1: you're willing to go so far as to call the
Speaker 1: other side Nazis and their nominee Hitler and to make
Speaker 1: governing impossible. You know, the Democrats are admiring that. They're saying, look,
Speaker 1: our nominee is even willing to throw her presidency away
Speaker 1: if she wins, just for the sake of winning. And
Speaker 1: they like that. They like that because it shows a
Speaker 1: last minute desperation. You know, it's like it's like the
Speaker 1: Palestinian terrorist leader, you know, when the Israelis killed Yah
Speaker 1: Sinor two weeks ago. Now there's drone video of his
Speaker 1: last moments that he doesn't have a he doesn't have
Speaker 1: a gun anymore. He throws a stick. Yeah, he throws
Speaker 1: a stick. He throws a stick at the drone. That
Speaker 1: throwing of the stick has made him a hero among
Speaker 1: Palestinians because it's a symbol of resistance to the very
Speaker 1: last object in your hand, you're going to try to
Speaker 1: kill the enemy. And that's what democrats like about what
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris is doing about Hitler. I know, to you
Speaker 1: and I and actually the most saying people, it would
Speaker 1: be absurd, But keep in mind they have cultivated a
Speaker 1: kind of mental illness and their followers where they they
Speaker 1: believe that this is the next coming of the Third Rife.
Speaker 1: With your pardon the language, I call it the Third
Speaker 1: Rife illusion but you know, like they basically, they basically
Speaker 1: created this this nightmare that they then want to live
Speaker 1: inside of because it's easier for them than confronting what
Speaker 1: you addressed at the top of the segment, which is
Speaker 1: the lack of policy, the failures in government. But it
Speaker 1: does create this toxic environment, and they are applauding this
Speaker 1: Hitler stuff because they know it's not true. If they applied.
Speaker 1: I've talked to Democratic friends, they won't even try to
Speaker 1: defend it, Like I've said to them, you know, you
Speaker 1: know how offensive it is to put this comparison out there.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm a Jewish person, You're going to compare
Speaker 1: me to Hitler to a Nazi because I'm going to
Speaker 1: vote for Donald Trump. They won't defend it. They know
Speaker 1: it's wrong, but it shows them that their side hasn't
Speaker 1: given up, and that's why they're excited about it, and
Speaker 1: that's why it's all over the media. It doesn't mean
Speaker 1: it's convincing any voters. We don't know.
Speaker 2: Well, it is illustrative of how desperate they have to
Speaker 2: be that they are repeating something they know to be
Speaker 2: fundamentally false, untrue, and not even supported by four years
Speaker 2: of his presidency. I mean, you know, any objective person
Speaker 2: anywhere would look at that and say that's preposterous. One
Speaker 2: read the definition of fascism, then try to explain how
Speaker 2: you can pigeonhole Donald Trump into fascism when he's the
Speaker 2: one that wants to get rid of the regulatory state
Speaker 2: that's controlling the means of production. The definition of fascism.
Speaker 2: You know, he didn't try to exterminate the Jewish population
Speaker 2: everybody else while he was president. He did get the
Speaker 2: Abraham Accords, which was awesome and deserving of the Peace Prize.
Speaker 2: I'm going to go up and down the line, but
Speaker 2: you've got to go down.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute before you go up and down the line.
Speaker 1: You know, they have a laundry list, and laundry lists
Speaker 1: are there when people don't actually have a good argument.
Speaker 1: So they're throwing this list out there, and what it's
Speaker 1: doing is it's forcing us to talk about fascism, which
Speaker 1: is exactly what they want. They don't want us talking
Speaker 1: about the economy and the borders and the medicine the world.
Speaker 1: But let me just address one of the key components
Speaker 1: of the fascist charges. Probably the argument they think is
Speaker 1: the best argument, which is that he thinks or he
Speaker 1: has said words to the effect that he will attack
Speaker 1: the enemy within. They say he's going to use the
Speaker 1: military against American citizens. And JD. Vance actually had the
Speaker 1: right response to that, which was, yes, of course, if
Speaker 1: you come out into the streets again when Donald Trump
Speaker 1: wins and you try to riot, and you try to
Speaker 1: make the country un goovernable, we are going to call
Speaker 1: out the military, just like democratics, governors and mayors had
Speaker 1: to call out the military during the George Floyd riots.
Speaker 1: I mean Tim Walt had to call out the National Guard.
Speaker 1: He did it late, but he called out the National Guard.
Speaker 1: And yes, we're going to do that. And also I
Speaker 1: would add that the people who have broken the law
Speaker 1: in an attempt to get Donald Trump, and people who
Speaker 1: have violated other people's rights, they should be prosecuted absolutely,
Speaker 1: as there are members of the January sixth Committee who
Speaker 1: in my view, violated the fundamental civil rights of witnesses
Speaker 1: and targets of that investigation. They in my view, broke
Speaker 1: the law when they destroyed the evidence that they spent
Speaker 1: two years gathering because they didn't want Republicans to look
Speaker 1: at it. I think those people need to be investigated
Speaker 1: and if they broke the law, they need to be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: But to Democrats, that's fascism. So listen, this comes full circle.
Speaker 1: It's absurd to you and me, but it's not absurd
Speaker 1: to them, and I'll tell you why. Once again, it
Speaker 1: created a illusion that they like to live inside of.
Speaker 1: But also they are projecting. They're saying things like Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's going to put his political opponents in jail, as
Speaker 1: they are trying to put him in jail. Steve Bannon,
Speaker 1: my former boss, he got out of jail this morning.
Speaker 1: He never should have been in jail, but they went
Speaker 1: after him for defying a subpoena for this show Trial
Speaker 1: committee in Congress. So they know what they did and
Speaker 1: are doing to the political opposition, and that's why they're afraid,
Speaker 1: because if the shoe is ever on the other foot,
Speaker 1: they know they're in big trouble. Where they fear they're
Speaker 1: in big trouble not because of what Trump would do,
Speaker 1: but because of what they know they are trying to do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what they fear.
Speaker 2: That's straight out of the leftist playbook. You accuse the
Speaker 2: other side of doing exactly what you were doing in
Speaker 2: order to deflect attention from what you're doing is if
Speaker 2: it would work for anybody attention.
Speaker 1: It's more than that, it's more than attacks. If they
Speaker 1: have a real fear. The Jake Tappers of the world,
Speaker 1: of his Chinese of the world, the Adam Kinsingers of
Speaker 1: the world, the Adam Shifts of the world, they have
Speaker 1: a real fear that there's going to be a moment
Speaker 1: where they are investigated, where they are looked at, where
Speaker 1: they are perhaps prosecuted. You know, Jake Tapper, his hands
Speaker 1: are not clean when it comes to things like the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion, oaks, he knew about the phony Docier and
Speaker 1: so forth. I mean, there is, and I've written this
Speaker 1: in my book The Agenda, there's a level of collusion
Speaker 1: between the media and the Democratic Party that has to
Speaker 1: be on because it's corrosive to our democracy. You know,
Speaker 1: we have these broadcast networks. I heard someone talking about
Speaker 1: this yesterday, ABC, NBCCDS. They are supposed to provide a
Speaker 1: public service. That's why they get free access to the airwaves,
Speaker 1: that's why they get licenses. And I'm a believer in
Speaker 1: absolute free speech. But if what they're doing is promoting division,
Speaker 1: if what they're doing is backing one side over another
Speaker 1: in elections. If the coverage, according to NewsBusters of the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign is eighty five percent negative on these on
Speaker 1: these networks, then what public service are they performing? You know,
Speaker 1: we need to look at some of these questions and
Speaker 1: ask I don't think there's any sense in a return
Speaker 1: to the fairness doctrine or canceling people because they have
Speaker 1: their own opinions, But we need to look at creating
Speaker 1: some kind of independent body that can vet what the
Speaker 1: editorial policies are of these networks so that we can
Speaker 1: understand that our media coverage is. It doesn't have to
Speaker 1: be perfectly fair. It can have an opinion, but it's
Speaker 1: at least going to be positive in a sense that
Speaker 1: it contributes to democratic discourse in this country. You know,
Speaker 1: you can have a fight forever about what that means.
Speaker 1: But I think there's a reckoning coming, and I think
Speaker 1: that's what they know is coming. I mean, you're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to get away with on MSNBC. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's cable, it's not broadcast, it doesn't have the same
Speaker 1: licensing requirements, But how do you put up pictures of
Speaker 1: a Nazi rally and intersperse them with with Trump's rally
Speaker 1: at Madison Square Garden as if the two had anything
Speaker 1: to do with each other. And you know their parent
Speaker 1: network is NBC, so I think NBC, Comcast, whoever the
Speaker 1: owners are, they need to be hauled in front of
Speaker 1: Congress and asked to explain to the American people why
Speaker 1: their network is inciting hatred and inciting violence among Americans
Speaker 1: because that's what it's doing. And they know a reckoning
Speaker 1: is coming because they know what they're getting away with now,
Speaker 1: and that's why the fear is real. So this Hitler stuff, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's it's garbage, but it speaks to the sense of
Speaker 1: fear that they have, that they actually deserve level of
Speaker 1: accountability that that won't come with a democratic administration in power,
Speaker 1: but might come as Trump is in office.
Speaker 2: Read all about Joel Pollock, my guest today from breit Bart.
Speaker 2: You can read about what he writes every single day
Speaker 2: at Breitbart dot com. Get a copy of his book.
Speaker 2: He alluded to it. Let me mention it Joel hook
Speaker 2: it up on my blog page fifty five cars dot Com.
Speaker 2: The agenda What Trump should do in his first one
Speaker 2: hundred days again by my guest today, Joel Pollock, with
Speaker 2: a forward by the aforementioned Steven Bannon. Joel always great
Speaker 2: having on the program. I appreciate your thoughtful insight and
Speaker 2: I will very much look forward to having you back
Speaker 2: on the program again real soon. One week, my friend
Speaker 2: for one week twenty eight, twenty one to fifty five
Speaker 2: care see the talk station. Get in touch with COVER SINCEY,
Speaker 2: my buddy John Roman, his entire team there to help
Speaker 2: you find better medical insurance coverage. It's open a rollment
Speaker 2: for a lot of folks. Now is the definite time,
Speaker 2: especially like if you're a small business, get in touch
Speaker 2: with Cover SINCEY. You have them take a look at
Speaker 2: every single person on your team and maybe come up
Speaker 2: with different policies for each one based upon their needs.
Speaker 2: And that's what they do. They have zero dollar deductible.
Speaker 2: You know what, All their outpatient services come with a
Speaker 2: zero dollar deductible. Their plans are available all year round.
Speaker 2: You get to choose your doctors. What's more, thirty to
Speaker 2: sixty percent lower costs than Obamacare. Think about that, better
Speaker 2: medical insurance coverage, less out of pocket liability. You choose
Speaker 2: the doctors and cheaper. This is why it's worth a
Speaker 2: phone call. All you need to do is reach out
Speaker 2: and call them or fill the format of the website
Speaker 2: to start the process and they can address your medical
Speaker 2: needs because they are working for you. Access to hundreds
Speaker 2: of insurance companies and thousands of policies to put together
Speaker 2: a package with better benefits and less money sounds impossible.
Speaker 2: Put them to the test, no obligation again, just a
Speaker 2: few moments of your time five one three eight hundred
Speaker 2: call five one three eight hundred two two five five.
Speaker 2: Online you can fill the format of the website which
Speaker 2: is COVERSINCI dot com.
Speaker 1: Fifty five KRC dot com. For more information about contests
Speaker 1: on