Speaker 1: This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Let's a celebration
Speaker 1: continue as it should eight five five four zero five
Speaker 1: A two to five to five the number text d
Speaker 1: A N five seven seven three nine. Ryan's going to
Speaker 1: be throwing a party tonight because doctor Oz is back
Speaker 1: in the saddle.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm going to.
Speaker 1: Add Medicare Medicaid services. And who doesn't like doctor Oz.
Speaker 1: That's solid than the voters of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 3: Well they rejected him.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, but somebody voted for him. Lots of people
Speaker 1: voted from anyway. He is back in the administration and
Speaker 1: we have a lot to talk about. What do you
Speaker 1: think the effect is going to be in Colorado of
Speaker 1: Trump's deportation effort? And I guess he is going to
Speaker 1: call it Operation Aurora. We'll see if that's confirmed soon.
Speaker 1: He said before that he would. He said it would
Speaker 1: start in Aurora, so may very well start in Ara.
Speaker 1: But what do you think the statewide effect of it
Speaker 1: is going to be anxious to get your take on
Speaker 1: that eight five five four zero five eight two five
Speaker 1: five text d A N five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 2: We got to start with this, right, because.
Speaker 1: You got all of these, all of these lefties who
Speaker 1: have been so weak and so pathetic in office and
Speaker 1: have allowed criminals to have their way with this state
Speaker 1: much more.
Speaker 2: Than they should.
Speaker 1: And that includes criminals here legally, criminals here illegally. The
Speaker 1: criminals have clearly been prioritized over law abiding citizens by
Speaker 1: the left because you know all of these Polis wise
Speaker 1: or the whole bunch of them, You know that they
Speaker 1: all obviously want to get and hold power, and the
Speaker 1: people who will to operate the Democratic Party right now
Speaker 1: are so far left. I mean, look at Kamala Harris, right,
Speaker 1: And so that this whole insane idea of these criminals
Speaker 1: rights has taken over the Democratic Party and they're an
Speaker 1: awful lot of voting Democrats who don't like it. You
Speaker 1: saw that reflect it on election day. But so it
Speaker 1: puts them in this position where we're about to see
Speaker 1: something really funny unfold because you're going to have all
Speaker 1: these people and you're a little from it wiser in
Speaker 1: a second, really goofy stuff. He had to say on
Speaker 1: National TV. They're going to be puffing out their chest.
Speaker 1: I'm going to stand up, says Jason Crow. I'm going
Speaker 1: to stand up, says Phil Wiser. I'm going to stand up,
Speaker 1: says Jared Polis.
Speaker 2: As he said that.
Speaker 4: Ryan.
Speaker 1: If he hasn't, he probably will. I'm going to stand
Speaker 1: up against Trump right right. Can't wait to watch that
Speaker 1: because this one, there is no gray area. This is
Speaker 1: absolutely black, absolutely white. This is federal preemption immigration law
Speaker 1: that's run by the fads, that's directed by the President
Speaker 1: for the most part, Congress in some other areas, but
Speaker 1: it's a federal deal, Phil Wiser, and you know it.
Speaker 1: So you're out there misleading people. You're out there misleading
Speaker 1: people into believing that Phil and Jared Polis.
Speaker 2: They can stand up to Trump.
Speaker 1: Hell no, Trump's going to come in and Trump is
Speaker 1: going to target, as he said, not not you know,
Speaker 1: mom and pop coming across the border trying to build
Speaker 1: a better life for the kids. He's going to target
Speaker 1: the folks here illegally who have committed other crimes. The
Speaker 1: folks here I legally who committed serious crimes in their
Speaker 1: prior country.
Speaker 2: But Biden let him in any way.
Speaker 1: And the folks who've been adjudicated, they had their day
Speaker 1: in court and the court said you got to go home,
Speaker 1: and they didn't go. And Trump's going to come in
Speaker 1: and he's going to use the tools available to do
Speaker 1: what he can to get folks in those categories to leave,
Speaker 1: and there's nothing phil Wiser can do to stop that,
Speaker 1: or Jared Polis or John Hickenlooper or Michael benefit Bennett's
Speaker 1: So they're giving people false hope.
Speaker 5: So let's play this out and assume that phil Wiser
Speaker 5: is not bluffing, which I believe that he may be
Speaker 5: according to the logic you just portrayed and painted out there, Dan,
Speaker 5: But that with the federal agents coming in ICE, et cetera.
Speaker 5: Let's say they go into Aurora and they find Trend
Speaker 5: de Aragua gang members. Are you really telling me the
Speaker 5: Colorado State Police, the Aurora PD, by direction of Phil
Speaker 5: Wiser the Attorney General of Colorado, are going to stand
Speaker 5: up to the Feds and ICE and say, no, you
Speaker 5: leave that Trend de Aragua gang member alone.
Speaker 1: He belongs here. No, they're not going to do any
Speaker 1: of this. They're going to go hide under their bed
Speaker 1: right and they're just such phony. He's got to remember.
Speaker 1: And I know this is hard for the rest of
Speaker 1: us to calculate, but to the left, truth is a weakness.
Speaker 1: Not only does truth not matter to them, if you're
Speaker 1: tethered to the truth, they view you as weak.
Speaker 2: And again that goes back to.
Speaker 1: The lack of morality, the core lack of morality of
Speaker 1: the secular left. I'm not talking Democrats, but but Democrats
Speaker 1: don't run the Democratic Party. The secular left runs the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. So it's all fundamentally dishonest. It reminds me
Speaker 1: Ryan of before your time. But treatans like George Wallace,
Speaker 1: you know, racist losers like George Wallace who stood in
Speaker 1: the school house door to try to stop the federal
Speaker 1: government from integrating schools. You know, that's what people like
Speaker 1: Wiser are implying, and Pritzker is saying that they're essentially
Speaker 1: going to stand.
Speaker 2: In the school house door to stop.
Speaker 1: The FEDS from getting criminal actors, people who've committed violent,
Speaker 1: criminal offenses out of the country.
Speaker 2: Think about what an insane.
Speaker 1: Backwards, preposterous position these Democrats have put themselves in, where
Speaker 1: now they've made it out to be some noble act
Speaker 1: to protect people who've committed violent crimes. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to let Donald Trump have them. You've got refuge here
Speaker 1: in Aurora. You've committed that rape, you've committed that murder,
Speaker 1: You've committed that violent crime. I'm going to stand between
Speaker 1: you and Donald Trump so he can't get rid of you.
Speaker 1: Think of the bizarre position they've put themselves in. So
Speaker 1: to answer your question, my friend, no, they're not actually
Speaker 1: going to try to do that because they couldn't get
Speaker 1: away with it. What is completely obscene and immoral is
Speaker 1: it is what they have been doing. Every one of
Speaker 1: these sanctuary city sanctuary state lunacyacs has been intended to
Speaker 1: protect not not your typical illegal immigrant who comes here
Speaker 1: seeking a better life and obeys other laws once they're here,
Speaker 1: which is the majority of folks here illegally, but all
Speaker 1: these lefties have been devoted to protecting folks who came
Speaker 1: here illegally and then committed other violent crimes. They have
Speaker 1: become the holy grail. They become the special class that
Speaker 1: that must be protected at all costs. That's what these
Speaker 1: sanctuary city laws are. And it's just like the Left
Speaker 1: has put itself in this bazaar upside down Alice in
Speaker 1: Wonderland world of Oh no, no, that guy is a penis.
Speaker 1: He can be in your daughter's shower at school and
Speaker 1: you're a bigot if you think there's anything wrong with that.
Speaker 1: So the Democrats have themselves in this position of being
Speaker 1: flagrantly anti woman. I wonder why they lost. Hard to
Speaker 1: imagine how that could have happened. Now, Ryan, here's the question,
Speaker 1: and I'd love to hear from folks on this, And
Speaker 1: what do you think the effect is going to be
Speaker 1: on Colorado of Trump's Operation Aurora, which is going to
Speaker 1: start soon after he takes office. Yeah, does all this
Speaker 1: craziness which we just saw play out on the national
Speaker 1: stage and led to these big Trump victories, I don't
Speaker 1: call them GOP victories, these big Trump victories across the country.
Speaker 1: Does that mean, and I'm giving you your next bumper
Speaker 1: here right now, Ryan, does that mean we have a chance?
Speaker 1: Does that mean that the GOP actually has a chance
Speaker 1: of winning statewide in Colorado?
Speaker 2: Or is Colorado just too far gone?
Speaker 1: Height five five four zero five A two five five
Speaker 1: The number takes d an five seven seven three nine,
Speaker 1: Because you know it's it's going to be fascinating in
Speaker 1: this cycle because Polis is term limited, as you know,
Speaker 1: and so the dumb candidate for governor isn't going to
Speaker 1: have Polis is twenty four, twenty five, twenty six, twenty
Speaker 1: seven million and up to spend on that race. John Hickenlooper,
Speaker 1: if he hangs in there, he'll have plenty of money
Speaker 1: from the left, but he's not going to have the
Speaker 1: pocket bankroll of a Polis. Does this mean that the
Speaker 1: GOP actually has a chance?
Speaker 6: Here?
Speaker 1: Secretary of State's Office treasure Yeah, what do you think?
Speaker 1: Eight five five for zero five eight two five five
Speaker 1: the number text d an five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: But as we go to break, have have to give
Speaker 1: you this instant classic of Phil Wiser with Joy Red
Speaker 1: spewing total gibberish. So either he's an idiot or he
Speaker 1: thinks you are. And listen, we know Phil Wiser is
Speaker 1: a smart guy intellectually, who does a lot of dumb
Speaker 1: things and says a lot of things that really aren't accurate.
Speaker 2: So he just thinks you're the dum How do you
Speaker 2: stop him?
Speaker 4: If he decides to order the State of Colorado to
Speaker 4: round up every single undocumented person there and send them
Speaker 4: to an internment camp.
Speaker 7: What do you do, Joy, I appreciate your familiarity with Colorado,
Speaker 7: and you know.
Speaker 1: Not any intellectually honest person, I'll pay the rest after
Speaker 1: the break. Any intellectually honest person in Phil Wiser's shoes
Speaker 1: would have said, Joy. First of all, we don't expect
Speaker 1: that to happen. Let me tell you what I think
Speaker 1: will happen. And listen, if Phil Wiser was a big
Speaker 1: timer and actually wanted to separate himself from this kind
Speaker 1: of lefty craziness, he'd say, well, Joy, wait.
Speaker 2: A second yet, that that isn't going to happen. That's
Speaker 2: not what he's talking about, bod.
Speaker 1: And then Wiser from the left can say that I
Speaker 1: do think he'll do something bad, but instead he buys
Speaker 1: into an obvious, obviously ludicrous premise. Again, they view honesty
Speaker 1: as a weakness. The left views on dnesty as a weakness.
Speaker 2: It just bit him in.
Speaker 1: The button the presidential Let's see what it does in
Speaker 1: Colorado this time around. You're on the Dan Capla.
Speaker 3: Show and now back to the Dan Taplass Show podcast.
Speaker 1: The one thing that I will not forgive them for
Speaker 1: is they're trying to steal the joy from this country.
Speaker 8: Hold wait, a minute, Right.
Speaker 9: Who trumps iconic dance moves are sweeping the internet and
Speaker 9: winning him a lot of fans across the globe.
Speaker 5: Trumps dance moves.
Speaker 2: Run shows, brown and even after he's elections country, and
Speaker 2: it seems.
Speaker 7: Like everyone wants to publing the band back.
Speaker 1: One of the many great things about Trump's victory, Right,
Speaker 1: finally a dance. Everybody can do the Trump It's so fun.
Speaker 1: Every game you watch now seems like every game somebody's
Speaker 1: doing it. Great great unifier. Have you noticed, Ryan? I
Speaker 1: mentioned this to Amy last night we were watching some
Speaker 1: Monday night football. So many more now players are openly
Speaker 1: praising God and thanking God and giving the credit to God.
Speaker 1: And we've seen more of that since Taba. But I
Speaker 1: think there's been a real ramp up, you know, since
Speaker 1: Trump won.
Speaker 3: I think there is a much larger cultural shift, Dan
Speaker 3: that we even can have a finger on right now
Speaker 3: as happening.
Speaker 1: No that again, I don't mean to sound like a
Speaker 1: broken record, but it's hard to hide my joy. Sorry,
Speaker 1: Tim Wells with your phony joy. But I do think
Speaker 1: we're in one of those moments like I've never had
Speaker 1: my young lifetime, where we're looking at the opportunity for
Speaker 1: this major leap forward as a nation and as a
Speaker 1: world mark. In monument, you're on the dan kaplash'll welcome.
Speaker 6: Yeah, thanks for taking my colleture. The question I have
Speaker 6: is I'm worried about, you know, these liberal counties, cities
Speaker 6: in Colorado and world the country that are going to
Speaker 6: really put up a fight against Trump on the immigration.
Speaker 6: I was thinking back in the eighties. I think Reagan
Speaker 6: raised the drinking age from eighteen to twenty one, and
Speaker 6: I think everybody fouled sup very quickly because he was
Speaker 6: able to I don't know if it was Congress or
Speaker 6: the administration was able to hold federal finds from the
Speaker 6: states that were being slow about it. I'm just wondering,
Speaker 6: is there something like that. How can the administration or
Speaker 6: Congress really put pressure on Colorado, the cities, these other
Speaker 6: states that want to fight it.
Speaker 1: Well, my friend, first, let me start with the obvious
Speaker 1: and then I'll get to something I think I'll really
Speaker 1: excite you.
Speaker 2: But the obvious is that this is.
Speaker 1: All total phony bluster on the part of Phil Wiser
Speaker 1: and the rest of them. This is clear federal law
Speaker 1: preempts the president has his powers that there's nothing.
Speaker 2: That any of these lefties can do to stop.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 2: They can go to court. They're free to go to any.
Speaker 1: Courthouse in the land, and any court can rule any
Speaker 1: way it wants to. But in terms of somehow trying
Speaker 1: to thwart them outside the court process, no way, no how,
Speaker 1: And I don't think.
Speaker 2: You're even going to see them try. Now, let me
Speaker 2: give you an exciting idea.
Speaker 1: You want to end this sanctuary city madness instantly, and
Speaker 1: every sine American should want to do that. If you're
Speaker 1: sitting there in your top priority right now is caring
Speaker 1: for the welfare of people here illegally who are not
Speaker 1: committing any kind of other crimes, then you would back
Speaker 1: this just as much as somebody who's top priority is
Speaker 1: getting folks who are here illegally out.
Speaker 2: Of the country.
Speaker 1: But here's what the administration can do, my friend, Well,
Speaker 1: they would need Congress in order to stop this sanctuary
Speaker 1: city suicidal madness.
Speaker 6: Right now.
Speaker 2: You pass a federal law.
Speaker 1: You pass a federal law that creates, say, a federal
Speaker 1: right to sue civil rights violation, a federal right to
Speaker 1: sue any of these sanctuary cities which which knowingly protect
Speaker 1: people here illegally who have committed other violent crimes, and
Speaker 1: you allow the victims of those people being protected by
Speaker 1: the Mike Johnston's and Jared Poulis's of the world, etc.
Speaker 1: You allow them to sue those sanctuary cities and states
Speaker 1: for damages. That's going to end it instantly, because there
Speaker 1: is so much human carnage caused by folks here illegally
Speaker 1: who then commit other crimes and are then protected by
Speaker 1: the left, protected by the left, that I think those
Speaker 1: damages awards would be devastating enough that it would end
Speaker 1: the madness. I don't want to see any of these
Speaker 1: cities or states ruined, not at all. That isn't the point.
Speaker 1: The point isn't to allow a bunch of people to
Speaker 1: go out and collect the large damages. The point is
Speaker 1: to end the madness and end the harm, so there
Speaker 1: aren't these lawsuits being filed.
Speaker 5: Okay, what do you think of that?
Speaker 6: One other question?
Speaker 2: Yeah, you were as suppressed as I thought you would
Speaker 2: be with that.
Speaker 10: No. I liked it.
Speaker 6: I liked it.
Speaker 2: You just didn't.
Speaker 6: What happened to the Mike Johnson Like what happened to
Speaker 6: him because it seemed like, you know, I feel like
Speaker 6: he folded uh in Aurora.
Speaker 1: He's he's intoxicated with power. You're talking about Mike Johnston,
Speaker 1: the mayor of Denver.
Speaker 11: For the mayor of Denver.
Speaker 6: But who's the Who's the Who's.
Speaker 11: The mayor of Aurora?
Speaker 2: Mike Kaufman.
Speaker 11: Mike Kaufman.
Speaker 6: It also seems like I worry about him. Is like
Speaker 6: he seems like he's kind of folded, like, you know, oh,
Speaker 6: nothing nothing to see here, nothing to look at. I
Speaker 6: know he doesn't want you know, he's running the city
Speaker 6: and doesn't want to look bad.
Speaker 2: On him, But I mean, come on, well, interesting, thank
Speaker 2: you for that market.
Speaker 1: And I go back a long, long way with with
Speaker 1: Mike Kaufman my take on all that, because Mike's that
Speaker 1: right here.
Speaker 2: I mean I could reach out, I could touch where
Speaker 2: he was.
Speaker 1: Mike' sat right here and said we have entire blocks
Speaker 1: we've lost control of there, and then later said, oh,
Speaker 1: that didn't have to do with TDA.
Speaker 2: But here's the point. I think Mike there was trying
Speaker 2: to walk a line.
Speaker 1: And I know some people I respect will strongly disagree
Speaker 1: with this and think I'm going too easy on them,
Speaker 1: which I probably am.
Speaker 2: But I think Mike was trying to walk a line.
Speaker 2: Where he wanted to acknowledge.
Speaker 1: The reality of TDA and the terrible harm it's causing
Speaker 1: and other criminal behavior is causing, but still try to
Speaker 1: defend his city and its reputation and try to protect,
Speaker 1: you know, the economic engine in his city. I think
Speaker 1: Mike has been trying to walk that line, and that's
Speaker 1: that's what I think is going on there.
Speaker 2: Eight five five for the five A two five five
Speaker 2: the number.
Speaker 1: But President Trump has said he's going to start the
Speaker 1: big deportation effort in Aurora. But again, as he always mentioned, emphasizes,
Speaker 1: and you know Tom Homan did again today. You know
Speaker 1: that the folks that they're going after right now are
Speaker 1: those public safety threats.
Speaker 9: Yeah, we got three rails of business lawrence. First ball,
Speaker 9: we got securitive order. We know how to do that,
Speaker 9: We've done it before it Stsyco Baul. We need to
Speaker 9: run this deportation operations. The President's been clear, we're going
Speaker 9: out of the gate. We're going to focus on public
Speaker 9: safety threats and national security threats. First, excuse us if
Speaker 9: those who cross the bord legally had great doing process,
Speaker 9: a great taxpayers fans were order removed by an immigration judge,
Speaker 9: then didn't leave. They're also a priority. And third rail,
Speaker 9: we got to find over with three hundred thousand children
Speaker 9: that were released into this country to so called sponsors
Speaker 9: that the government can't find, we also got to find
Speaker 9: them children.
Speaker 2: To try to save them. Who would argue with that?
Speaker 1: And if you're in the audience and you would argue
Speaker 1: with what Trump intends to do as articulated by Home
Speaker 1: and I would love to hear from you, love respectful conversation.
Speaker 1: I'd just like to hear your logic there when it
Speaker 1: comes to those groups he identified eight five five forour
Speaker 1: zero five two five five text d an five seven,
Speaker 1: seven through nine. What do you think the effect's going
Speaker 1: to be on this state of Colorado of these coming deportations.
Speaker 3: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 9: Well, if they don'tant to help us get the hell
Speaker 9: out the way, if we're going to do it, If
Speaker 9: I got sent twice amount of resources that city, that's
Speaker 9: what we're going to do. If they able to give
Speaker 9: us access to the jail, that would mean less agents
Speaker 9: to the community. For then pushing back and not let
Speaker 9: us in the jail, it just means more agents are
Speaker 9: gonna be in the community. So they're hurting themselves. Finally,
Speaker 9: I'll say this, they need to educate themselves. They didn't
Speaker 9: review this totally. The United States Cold thirteen twenty four
Speaker 9: Triple I read about that and don't cross that line
Speaker 9: because it is a felony to harbor and conceal and
Speaker 9: illego anily from Ice read the statue, don't cross that line.
Speaker 2: I love it when Tom Holman talk that way.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's just talking about getting rid of people
Speaker 1: here illegally who have committed other crimes. And talking about
Speaker 1: people here illegally you've been fully adjudicated.
Speaker 2: And ordered by a court to leave and haven't left.
Speaker 2: I mean, who can really argue with that?
Speaker 1: So when you get all this this tough talk, you know,
Speaker 1: from the phil Wisers of the world, just watch them
Speaker 1: slink away. When the Trump administration shows up to actually
Speaker 1: enforce the law, how.
Speaker 2: Do you stop him?
Speaker 4: If he decides to order the state of Colorado to
Speaker 4: round up every single undocumented person there and send them
Speaker 4: to an internment camp, what do you do?
Speaker 2: First of all, Wiser knows Trump isn't talking about that.
Speaker 1: That's a blatantly dishonest premise from Joy read, But Wiser
Speaker 1: doesn't have the guts to stand.
Speaker 6: Up to her.
Speaker 1: Right, he's a small timer. If he was a big timer,
Speaker 1: he'd just say, Joy, that's not what Trump's talking about.
Speaker 1: But I don't like what is Trump. Trump is talking about.
Speaker 1: But he's not a big timer. He's just playing this
Speaker 1: the same far left, dishonest role that just got those
Speaker 1: guys beaten the presidential But clearly the Democrats in Colorado
Speaker 1: think they cannot be beat in statewide races. They think
Speaker 1: they can go as far left as they want to
Speaker 1: in the primary to win the primary, and that then
Speaker 1: they're golden.
Speaker 2: I hope somebody proves them wrong.
Speaker 7: Joy, I appreciate your familiarity with Colorado, and you know
Speaker 7: the story of Ralph Carr. Ralph Carr faced this very question.
Speaker 7: The president at the time said we're going to in
Speaker 7: turn Japanese Americans, and that was based on an unconstitutional plan.
Speaker 7: The Supreme Court has later made clear that he was unconstitutional. Now,
Speaker 7: at the time, FDR was able to get it through,
Speaker 7: but Ralph Carr stood up for our constitution, for equal protection.
Speaker 10: Of the laws.
Speaker 1: What an insult to Japanese Americans? What an insult to
Speaker 1: Japanese Americans In Colorado, who are completely innocent people who
Speaker 1: were run off into camps and rough car bravely stood up. No,
Speaker 1: what we're talking about here is a much different scenario. Obviously,
Speaker 1: folks here illegally who then commit other serious crimes. So
Speaker 1: you're going to insult Japanese Americans by comparing them to
Speaker 1: folks here illegally then commit other crimes. No, it's small
Speaker 1: time stuff, and it's puffery, and Wiser is going to
Speaker 1: go hide under his desk as soon as Trump and
Speaker 1: the federal government show up to enforce the law. Sonny
Speaker 1: in the bathroom is how this caller describes him or herself.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan Kapla show. Welcome, Sonny.
Speaker 11: Oh, good to hear from you again, Dan.
Speaker 10: Thanks.
Speaker 11: So you are asking, you're asking the question what would
Speaker 11: affect in Colorado a mass? So I got three things
Speaker 11: I can think of and maybe another one but we'll
Speaker 11: see here. So the first would be, I think impact
Speaker 11: would be a reduced reduction of time to treatment in
Speaker 11: our emergency rooms. We know illegal aliens are one of
Speaker 11: the u of emergency rooms. We want them to have treatment,
Speaker 11: but if there's less of them, that'll be less time
Speaker 11: to treatment in our emergency rooms. The second would be
Speaker 11: that I would assume also a lot of these are
Speaker 11: kind of families that, as Holman said, well deport them
Speaker 11: as families. So we would have a reduction in our
Speaker 11: student to teacher ratio, which should increase well depends on
Speaker 11: the teachers' unions, but should increase the outcomes of education
Speaker 11: in the Denver public schools, which would then increase the
Speaker 11: future income of the citizens, the residents of Denver. The
Speaker 11: last one would be possibly downward pressure on housing pricing,
Speaker 11: because you'd have housing stock would actually go up as
Speaker 11: there would be less people in the houses here in
Speaker 11: the Denver area. So I could think of those three
Speaker 11: things for It's kind of questionable, so I want to
Speaker 11: even put it out there, but I want to say
Speaker 11: I am in Cassock. I am so looking forward to
Speaker 11: George Brockler coming in the DA. It's going to be amazing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you, Sonny. Very talented cat and a very
Speaker 1: funny guy as well. Now that the election's over, reop
Speaker 1: to have him back on Ara A bunch. Let's go
Speaker 1: to Adam and Severance, Colorado.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dame Capital, so welcome.
Speaker 10: Hi.
Speaker 6: Did can you hear me? All?
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, it's a little surface of the moon. But
Speaker 2: fire away.
Speaker 10: Here, let me switch off of my ear pod.
Speaker 2: That would be wonderful. Thank you my friends.
Speaker 10: All right, is that better?
Speaker 2: Oh my goodness, the whole new world?
Speaker 10: All right, I'll have to clean that thing. I was
Speaker 10: wanting to get your so you know, yeah, such as life. Yeah,
Speaker 10: I was wanting to get your opinion.
Speaker 8: I know.
Speaker 10: Hearing the wanmer Sean decision today as well, I was like, well, wait,
Speaker 10: that doesn't make any sense. But it doesn't this make
Speaker 10: a lot of wonderful sense. Like, just let it ride
Speaker 10: all the way until the next election cycle. I just
Speaker 10: leave it alone so they can try to drag it
Speaker 10: back up and say, oh, now we're going to be
Speaker 10: prosecuting Trump after the election.
Speaker 2: Is a great question, Adams. Here it goes again, Yeah, good,
Speaker 2: great question.
Speaker 10: Here it goes again, like here here go the DWNS
Speaker 10: down that sane, stupid road.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, thank you man. That's a really good question.
Speaker 1: Andy McCarthy joined us at four h six to talk
Speaker 1: about this, and if you haven't heard the news, what's
Speaker 1: going on is is the New York DA who launched
Speaker 1: this monstrosity of an abuse of our justice system the
Speaker 1: New York DA has now said he wants to put
Speaker 1: off Trump's sentencing until after he's out of office, and
Speaker 1: as Andy pointed out on the show any McCarthy, that
Speaker 1: would mean that Trump is not a convicted felon in
Speaker 1: the meantime, and Andy says, the Trump team is agreeable
Speaker 1: to putting it off until after Trump is out of office,
Speaker 1: while at the same time, the Trump team is moving
Speaker 1: for outright dismissal based on the Supreme courts l recent
Speaker 1: immunity ruling.
Speaker 2: So anyway, that's the lay of the land.
Speaker 1: And as Andy said, and it makes sense, the bet
Speaker 1: of the Trump team is that some time between now
Speaker 1: and when Trump leaves office, you know, New York will
Speaker 1: just go ahead and dismiss the charges because obviously, you know,
Speaker 1: there won't there shouldn't be any appetite to proceed with
Speaker 1: the case when Trump is then out of office.
Speaker 2: So that's what's going on now.
Speaker 1: Of course, what drives any thinking person crazy is that
Speaker 1: this prosecution was such an obscene abuse of our justice system.
Speaker 1: And I think most informed observers fully expect that President
Speaker 1: Trump will prevail on appeal and the convictions will be
Speaker 1: thrown out.
Speaker 2: So this delays that day when the convictions are eventually thrown.
Speaker 1: Out, because you can't take it up on appeal until
Speaker 1: after the sentencing. So that's where this thing is going
Speaker 1: to float in limbo over the next four years and
Speaker 1: hopefully be dismissed at some point point, as it should be.
Speaker 1: Eric in Denver, you're on the Dan Kapitlis Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome you Great America. Oh, Eric, you greater American.
Speaker 8: Hey, now, then we have a new sheriff in town,
Speaker 8: the Great Donald J. Trump. Can he eliminate the illegal
Speaker 8: privileged anchor baby law that these illegal women have.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't believe now that President Trump can address
Speaker 1: that issue by executive order personally. I believe that would
Speaker 1: have to go through the courts. And as you know,
Speaker 1: that's been a raging debate for years. But there is
Speaker 1: so much obviously that that President Trump is going to
Speaker 1: do and is going to do within minutes of being
Speaker 1: sworn in.
Speaker 8: Dan, how come they could use that I'll just put
Speaker 8: it out there, These Democrats and the clause to use
Speaker 8: the fourteenth Amendment to apply to the illegal eggo baby women.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and again, as you know, Eric, that's been fought
Speaker 1: in the courts. That's been out there forever. I just
Speaker 1: don't see a way for President Trump to address that
Speaker 1: by by executive.
Speaker 8: Order because nobody is talking about.
Speaker 2: It, you know, no, no, thank you, mammy.
Speaker 1: You're you're absolutely right. There's not been much talk about
Speaker 1: it at all. And Eric, in the last few seconds,
Speaker 1: we have what what effect do you think?
Speaker 2: What do you think it's going to look like in Colorado?
Speaker 1: Because it's going to happen very soon now, about two
Speaker 1: months away, when President Trump launches, people call it a
Speaker 1: mass deportation compared to the number of folks here illegally
Speaker 1: in Colorado. It's not going to be mass, but it's
Speaker 1: going to be large scale. What do you think that's
Speaker 1: going to look like in Colorado when it happens? Do
Speaker 1: you do you expect to see Phil Wiser or poll
Speaker 1: lists out there trying to interfere with these federal agents.
Speaker 8: I I'm hoping that that's a wonderful question. That Tom
Speaker 8: Holman could hang out with our John Fabricatory and give
Speaker 8: him some more leverage, you know, like how they have
Speaker 8: Elon Musk and uh Vate Ramaswami.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I'm not sworn in, just off the cup. Give
Speaker 6: him the czar type assistance to John V.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm saying, Yeah, it's going to be
Speaker 1: It's going to be so interesting to watch my friend.
Speaker 1: I apologize, I have to hit this break, but always
Speaker 1: great to talk to Eric. Thank you for that, because
Speaker 1: what you got right now is a lot of tough
Speaker 1: talk from the phil Wiser's and and these other lefties,
Speaker 1: and you're not going to be able to find him
Speaker 1: anywhere when when the Trump administration comes into fulfilled the law.
Speaker 1: They may run off and try to file a lawsuit
Speaker 1: or this or that, but but they know there's there's
Speaker 1: federal preemption here.
Speaker 2: They know that the Feds have the right to enforce
Speaker 2: the law here, and and that's the way it's going
Speaker 2: to be. You're on the dan Kaplus show.
Speaker 3: Well, and now back to the dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7: Joey, I would put this a little differently in terms
Speaker 7: of federalism is a protection of our rights. I recognize
Speaker 7: at the federal level we've seen a rollback of rights.
Speaker 7: Obviously the Dobbs decision and access to abortion care is
Speaker 7: on everyone's mind. If you're in Texas and you're a
Speaker 7: woman who needs an abortion to save your life, you
Speaker 7: may not get it that's terrifying. If you're a member
Speaker 7: of the LGBTQ plus community and you're living in certain states,
Speaker 7: you're going to be worried about discrimination and are you
Speaker 7: going to be protected.
Speaker 2: Here's the good news to the story.
Speaker 10: That you just told.
Speaker 2: If you're here in Colorado, we're going.
Speaker 7: To protect your freedoms, your right to access abortion care,
Speaker 7: your right to live and love whoever you want to.
Speaker 7: Colorado had those issues on the back.
Speaker 1: Wait a second, in Colorado, we're going to protect your freedom.
Speaker 1: So think about what he's talking about talking about.
Speaker 2: We're going to protect your.
Speaker 1: Freedom to kill black children at a rate at least
Speaker 1: five to one of white children. Right, that's his definition
Speaker 1: of freedom. That the freedom to kill large numbers of
Speaker 1: children before birth.
Speaker 2: That's just a matter of science.
Speaker 1: And protect your freedom to kill many more children of
Speaker 1: color than white children are killed and no children should
Speaker 1: be killed. That's that's the kind of freedom he's worshiping.
Speaker 9: Right.
Speaker 2: I mean, it just reminds me the old plantation owners, right.
Speaker 1: You know, we're just talking about freedom to operate our plantations.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's treating innocent human life as somebody else's property.
Speaker 1: But think about the fact these phony lefties who claim
Speaker 1: to be so enlightened and so DEI they're celebrating, they're
Speaker 1: celebrating this act that kills four or five children of
Speaker 1: color for every white child. And again, no children should
Speaker 1: be killed. But this is the same phil Wiser, right,
Speaker 1: Correct me if I'm wrong. Ryan didn't he fully back.
Speaker 1: Wasn't he out there celebrating, dancing around, just absolutely adoring
Speaker 1: firing Colorado workers if they didn't put medicine into their
Speaker 1: body that phil Wiser wanted him to take? Is that,
Speaker 1: mister freedom? Now, phil Wiser, how did he beat John Kellner? Oh,
Speaker 1: he didn't beat John Kellner. He didn't beat you. I
Speaker 1: think John was the leading GOP vote getter that phil
Speaker 1: Wiser didn't. Phil Wiser couldn't beat John Kellner at anything.
Speaker 1: You know, Democrats beat Republicans in Colorado. Anything with the
Speaker 1: red jersey on it was getting shot. That's just the
Speaker 1: way it was, right, Yeah, phil Wiser couldn't you know,
Speaker 1: fair fight, couldn't beat John Kellner at anything.
Speaker 2: I'm biased, but it's also true.
Speaker 1: I mean, when you look at these people on merit,
Speaker 1: on merit, you look at the Democrat candidates who won
Speaker 1: over the Republican candidates who lost.
Speaker 2: It's not even close on merit