WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Not an ideal situation when the dog catches the car

2
00:00:05.360 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and then the dog has no idea what to do.

3
00:00:08.039 --> 00:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And that is the reason why we need.

4
00:00:09.880 --> 00:00:12.679
<v Speaker 1>To make sure that when we overtake the majority, that

5
00:00:12.759 --> 00:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we actually have a plan. I've talked a lot Harry

6
00:00:15.119 --> 00:00:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Katy fan News about how if you don't immediately from

7
00:00:19.280 --> 00:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>day one, have an actual plan to be implemented, to

8
00:00:25.120 --> 00:00:28.559
<v Speaker 1>enforce and to pursue accountability for all of the wrongdoings

9
00:00:28.559 --> 00:00:30.559
<v Speaker 1>that have been perpetrated for the last two years under

10
00:00:30.559 --> 00:00:33.679
<v Speaker 1>this Trump regime, that I'm not interested in hearing about

11
00:00:33.799 --> 00:00:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the rest of your campaign. I'm not interested in hearing

12
00:00:36.719 --> 00:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>about the rest of your policies. There is the demand

13
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:44.399
<v Speaker 1>for true accountability and that can't just be through lip service.

14
00:00:44.799 --> 00:00:48.119
<v Speaker 1>That can't just be through angry rantings on places like YouTube.

15
00:00:48.399 --> 00:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>You actually have to have a blueprint for action. Which

16
00:00:53.520 --> 00:00:55.119
<v Speaker 1>is when I had the chance to be able to

17
00:00:55.159 --> 00:00:58.719
<v Speaker 1>read my good friend Brian Tyler Cohen's new book the

18
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:01.439
<v Speaker 1>day after, How to Wheel Power in a Post Trump World.

19
00:01:01.840 --> 00:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>I was happy to see that there was an actual

20
00:01:06.319 --> 00:01:11.799
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful analysis that goes into what we got to do.

21
00:01:13.319 --> 00:01:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Because what Brian's book does is it tackles a number

22
00:01:16.760 --> 00:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of things incredibly well. It tackles the historical framework within

23
00:01:22.040 --> 00:01:25.719
<v Speaker 1>which we are finding ourselves today. We have so much

24
00:01:25.760 --> 00:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to learn from history, especially when we see how well

25
00:01:30.239 --> 00:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans have destroyed and dismantled norms and institutions as

26
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:39.159
<v Speaker 1>they have built their own power up to a fever pitch,

27
00:01:40.319 --> 00:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all the while the Democrats are just standing there wringing

28
00:01:42.680 --> 00:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>their hands. And look, this is not me casting aspersions

29
00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>on the entirety of the party, but let's be honest

30
00:01:49.400 --> 00:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the pursuit of being the good guys. I think

31
00:01:53.480 --> 00:01:59.319
<v Speaker 1>we've and gals, I think we've lost the plot as Democrats.

32
00:01:59.840 --> 00:02:02.319
<v Speaker 1>So Brian's book looks and has kind of this is

33
00:02:02.359 --> 00:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the historical framework of what the hell happened to get

34
00:02:04.480 --> 00:02:10.479
<v Speaker 1>us here? But more importantly, and unlike other books, Brian says, Okay,

35
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>now we're here, what do we do the day after

36
00:02:13.080 --> 00:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump is gone? And that's why his book is essential reading.

37
00:02:19.360 --> 00:02:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make sure that we explored those themes.

38
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to make sure, now that we're a

39
00:02:23.960 --> 00:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of days out of some pretty wild primary results,

40
00:02:27.520 --> 00:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have a blunt conversation about what it looks

41
00:02:32.879 --> 00:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like going into the November general election, and so buckle

42
00:02:40.879 --> 00:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>up because it's a it's a pretty compelling conversation with

43
00:02:44.719 --> 00:02:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Brian Tyler Cohen. Joining me now is Brian Tyler Cohen,

44
00:02:47.879 --> 00:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a progressive YouTuber, but more importantly, the author of the

45
00:02:53.039 --> 00:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>amazing book The Day After, How to Wield Power in

46
00:02:56.439 --> 00:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a Post Trump World. This is coming on the heels

47
00:02:59.560 --> 00:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of another best selling book. Brian Tyler Cohen, thanks for.

48
00:03:03.240 --> 00:03:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Being here, Katie, Thanks for having me. I'm not saying

49
00:03:07.560 --> 00:03:09.599
<v Speaker 2>this jokingly. I'm not sure where you find the time

50
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to write a.

51
00:03:11.159 --> 00:03:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Book let alone do It's amazing what you can accomplish

52
00:03:14.680 --> 00:03:16.639
<v Speaker 3>when you're willing to sacrifice all of your mental health.

53
00:03:16.719 --> 00:03:19.199
<v Speaker 2>So well, I was going to say, sign me up.

54
00:03:19.360 --> 00:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what we do on the daily folks.

55
00:03:21.560 --> 00:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I was just with Brian at an event in DC

56
00:03:24.080 --> 00:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with a whole bunch of super like minded pro democracy folks.

57
00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why I was kind of not jokingly saying, I'm

58
00:03:29.840 --> 00:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure I has the time because we were

59
00:03:31.439 --> 00:03:33.319
<v Speaker 1>doing that and now he does all of the important

60
00:03:33.319 --> 00:03:36.639
<v Speaker 1>work that he does on YouTube. You don't actually want

61
00:03:36.639 --> 00:03:43.039
<v Speaker 1>to start with the label progressive YouTuber because I've kind

62
00:03:43.080 --> 00:03:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of been trying to deal with labels lately the last

63
00:03:46.039 --> 00:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, and I kind of feel like it's a

64
00:03:48.319 --> 00:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>great segue into your book eventually that we're going to

65
00:03:50.439 --> 00:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>get to. But you know, I've kind of been trying

66
00:03:54.080 --> 00:03:56.759
<v Speaker 1>to see if we stay with labels, we don't stay

67
00:03:56.759 --> 00:03:59.199
<v Speaker 1>with labels. I feel like labels sometimes add a little

68
00:03:59.199 --> 00:04:01.319
<v Speaker 1>bit of baggage. I've been saying we should look at

69
00:04:01.319 --> 00:04:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the candidates, what their policies, positions are, what they're standing for,

70
00:04:04.759 --> 00:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and really like, are they putting their money where their

71
00:04:07.120 --> 00:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>mouth is, because a lot of people talk a lot,

72
00:04:08.759 --> 00:04:11.159
<v Speaker 1>but they don't actually do something about it. Kind of

73
00:04:11.240 --> 00:04:14.719
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on where things stand right now post primaries

74
00:04:15.400 --> 00:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and as we kind of get a lay of the

75
00:04:16.759 --> 00:04:17.759
<v Speaker 1>land for November.

76
00:04:17.959 --> 00:04:19.879
<v Speaker 3>No, I think I think that's such a good point,

77
00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:23.079
<v Speaker 3>And you're right. I think that labels do kind of

78
00:04:23.120 --> 00:04:25.319
<v Speaker 3>carry along with them some degree of baggage that I

79
00:04:25.319 --> 00:04:30.560
<v Speaker 3>think is neither helpful nor really instructive of where candidates lie.

80
00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:34.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, there are there is Zornmandani in New

81
00:04:35.040 --> 00:04:38.519
<v Speaker 3>York who has a platform that is virtually indistinguishable from

82
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of other Democrats, regular Democrats, progressive Democrats who

83
00:04:41.680 --> 00:04:44.360
<v Speaker 3>are advocating for the same thing we're advocating for a

84
00:04:44.399 --> 00:04:47.279
<v Speaker 3>lower cost of living, who are advocating for permit reform,

85
00:04:47.319 --> 00:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>and so, you know, I think you're right that getting

86
00:04:50.759 --> 00:04:55.959
<v Speaker 3>stuck in focusing on what certain labels mean, especially as

87
00:04:56.000 --> 00:04:58.759
<v Speaker 3>we are in a post primary world now heading toward

88
00:04:58.800 --> 00:05:03.439
<v Speaker 3>the general probably does add an unnecessary degree of baggage.

89
00:05:03.600 --> 00:05:06.360
<v Speaker 3>I think as long as the candidates espouse certain positions,

90
00:05:06.399 --> 00:05:08.959
<v Speaker 3>that's how they should be, That's how they should be

91
00:05:09.040 --> 00:05:11.519
<v Speaker 3>kind of identified. And I feel like that's going to

92
00:05:11.560 --> 00:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>be where things move now that the primaries are behind

93
00:05:15.319 --> 00:05:18.959
<v Speaker 3>us and there's less of a focus on, like you know,

94
00:05:19.439 --> 00:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>intra party disputes and where people land on that ideological spectrum.

95
00:05:24.360 --> 00:05:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Look, I didn't relish the infighting. I think it's unhealthy

96
00:05:27.480 --> 00:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't help us as a party. But I

97
00:05:29.079 --> 00:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>will say, in some ways it was the spirit of

98
00:05:32.319 --> 00:05:35.519
<v Speaker 1>a competitive primary, was it not. You have a variety

99
00:05:35.639 --> 00:05:39.519
<v Speaker 1>of candidates, many of whom are not cookie cutter, and

100
00:05:39.560 --> 00:05:41.519
<v Speaker 1>they stand for different things, and then you let the

101
00:05:41.560 --> 00:05:44.399
<v Speaker 1>people pick the one who stands for the most of

102
00:05:44.439 --> 00:05:47.319
<v Speaker 1>what they think is emblematic or representative of who they are,

103
00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and that's who advances. I mean, in so many ways,

104
00:05:50.600 --> 00:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>having a competitive primary with having people that are standing

105
00:05:53.480 --> 00:05:54.319
<v Speaker 1>for different things.

106
00:05:54.720 --> 00:05:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I think kind of is democracy, is it not? It is?

107
00:05:57.879 --> 00:06:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And I have to try and remind myself that every day, because,

108
00:06:01.720 --> 00:06:04.839
<v Speaker 3>like you, I do not enjoy the primary process. I

109
00:06:04.839 --> 00:06:11.279
<v Speaker 3>think the infighting is like borderline intolerable. And I also

110
00:06:11.399 --> 00:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>know that there comes a point where after the primary happens,

111
00:06:14.680 --> 00:06:17.279
<v Speaker 3>most people are able to say, hey, we've gotten through that, Okay,

112
00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:21.240
<v Speaker 3>let's come together. And you have, you know, Hailey Stevens

113
00:06:21.319 --> 00:06:25.319
<v Speaker 3>endorsing abdulasi ed, you have Angie Craig endorsing Peggy flannagain,

114
00:06:25.360 --> 00:06:26.720
<v Speaker 3>and so it doesn't matter where you lie on the

115
00:06:26.720 --> 00:06:31.120
<v Speaker 3>ideological spectrum. The more moderate candidates are are endorsing the

116
00:06:31.120 --> 00:06:34.519
<v Speaker 3>more progressive candidates and vice versa. But there's always going

117
00:06:34.560 --> 00:06:38.040
<v Speaker 3>to be some sliver of people who harbor resentment because

118
00:06:38.040 --> 00:06:42.519
<v Speaker 3>of how ugly the primary process was. And so knowing

119
00:06:42.560 --> 00:06:46.439
<v Speaker 3>that and having lived through you know, Bernie Hillary, and

120
00:06:46.879 --> 00:06:49.839
<v Speaker 3>seeing how they're still fallout to this day a decade later,

121
00:06:49.920 --> 00:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>over that I do wish that the primary process was

122
00:06:53.439 --> 00:06:56.879
<v Speaker 3>less acrimonious, But I do have to remind myself like,

123
00:06:56.920 --> 00:07:00.199
<v Speaker 3>this is what democracy looks like. It is messy, It

124
00:07:00.279 --> 00:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>is at times hostile, but hopefully you've ended up with

125
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the candidate who's the strongest heading into heading into the

126
00:07:07.920 --> 00:07:11.600
<v Speaker 3>general election, and that's just how it goes. But yeah,

127
00:07:11.639 --> 00:07:15.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it is constantly coaching myself to be like

128
00:07:15.399 --> 00:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>this is it's normal, this is okay. It always happens

129
00:07:19.279 --> 00:07:22.639
<v Speaker 3>like this, and hopefully it leads to the better candidate

130
00:07:22.680 --> 00:07:23.319
<v Speaker 3>actually winning.

131
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Which is why this is actually the perfect timing to

132
00:07:27.120 --> 00:07:30.319
<v Speaker 1>be able to lean into your book, because what I

133
00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly love about the Day After is it's I think

134
00:07:33.399 --> 00:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>an incredible balance of doing a post mortem because I

135
00:07:37.759 --> 00:07:41.639
<v Speaker 1>am a huge, huge advocate of making sure that we

136
00:07:41.759 --> 00:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>got check ourselves with historical references and understanding how we

137
00:07:45.800 --> 00:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>got where we are.

138
00:07:46.560 --> 00:07:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Today, which your book does.

139
00:07:48.519 --> 00:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Your book does an incredibly brutal, brutal, honest assessment of

140
00:07:53.000 --> 00:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>what has happened in the time.

141
00:07:54.319 --> 00:07:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Leading up to where we are.

142
00:07:55.800 --> 00:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But then the great thing about your book is it's

143
00:07:57.519 --> 00:08:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the standalone in that it actually provides a blueprint and

144
00:08:00.759 --> 00:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it gives suggestions and ideas of what we do the

145
00:08:03.000 --> 00:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>day after we finally have a majority, the day after

146
00:08:07.079 --> 00:08:09.279
<v Speaker 1>we're back controlling the levers of power.

147
00:08:09.839 --> 00:08:11.759
<v Speaker 2>You know, as I mentioned a few minutes ago.

148
00:08:11.839 --> 00:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people like to actually complain and talk,

149
00:08:15.279 --> 00:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but they don't do anything. Your book the day after says,

150
00:08:19.279 --> 00:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>not only do we have to do something, but we

151
00:08:21.720 --> 00:08:24.959
<v Speaker 1>can't just be complacent and lazy and say, oh, we'll

152
00:08:25.040 --> 00:08:26.639
<v Speaker 1>just go back to what we had before when we

153
00:08:26.680 --> 00:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>had a majority pre Trump.

154
00:08:30.120 --> 00:08:32.440
<v Speaker 2>And just you know, do it, but tweak it.

155
00:08:32.840 --> 00:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>You like me, are an advocate to say, uh huh,

156
00:08:35.600 --> 00:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we actually have to not rebuild something. We have to

157
00:08:38.720 --> 00:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>start from scratch, like we have to learn from the

158
00:08:41.320 --> 00:08:44.759
<v Speaker 1>errors of the past, get our shit together, and figure

159
00:08:44.799 --> 00:08:47.399
<v Speaker 1>out that we have to build something brand new that

160
00:08:47.559 --> 00:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is strong enough to withstand, which I think is going

161
00:08:51.399 --> 00:08:53.519
<v Speaker 1>to be another wave of trump Ism, just in a

162
00:08:53.519 --> 00:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>different form from another person one hundred percent.

163
00:08:56.279 --> 00:08:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, I think that this is existential for

164
00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:02.600
<v Speaker 3>any democracy movement in this country because we already know,

165
00:09:03.039 --> 00:09:06.440
<v Speaker 3>as you've said, what the MAGA movement looks like. It's

166
00:09:06.480 --> 00:09:08.559
<v Speaker 3>not We're not going to have some epiphany in the

167
00:09:08.600 --> 00:09:12.519
<v Speaker 3>aftermath of the end of Trump. These people aren't going

168
00:09:12.559 --> 00:09:14.440
<v Speaker 3>to wake up and say, I don't know what happened

169
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:17.440
<v Speaker 3>the last ten years like this, this is the trajectory

170
00:09:17.440 --> 00:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>of this party. These are people who are anti democratic,

171
00:09:20.279 --> 00:09:23.519
<v Speaker 3>small D democratic and big D democratic, and they're not

172
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:25.440
<v Speaker 3>just going to wake up one day and say, like,

173
00:09:25.600 --> 00:09:28.600
<v Speaker 3>you know what, actually I changed, I changed, Yeah, I've

174
00:09:28.679 --> 00:09:30.879
<v Speaker 3>changed my mind. Actually, I do think that Democrats have

175
00:09:30.919 --> 00:09:33.320
<v Speaker 3>the right to get elected in this country. It's going

176
00:09:33.399 --> 00:09:37.039
<v Speaker 3>to get increasingly more difficult for them to accept election

177
00:09:37.120 --> 00:09:42.720
<v Speaker 3>results where they lose, for them to acknowledge the right

178
00:09:42.879 --> 00:09:45.200
<v Speaker 3>of both parties to be able to play by the

179
00:09:45.240 --> 00:09:48.279
<v Speaker 3>same set of rules. And so if we don't start

180
00:09:48.320 --> 00:09:50.720
<v Speaker 3>to change things, if we don't rebuild these systems to

181
00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:55.039
<v Speaker 3>actually contend with what the opposition looks like right now,

182
00:09:55.120 --> 00:09:57.519
<v Speaker 3>and that is an opposition that will abuse any levers

183
00:09:57.519 --> 00:09:59.200
<v Speaker 3>of power if they can get their hands on them,

184
00:09:59.399 --> 00:10:02.759
<v Speaker 3>then we're to repeat the same problems that we're dealing

185
00:10:02.799 --> 00:10:04.759
<v Speaker 3>with right now. I think a good microcosm for that

186
00:10:04.879 --> 00:10:08.960
<v Speaker 3>is like our justice system. I mean, you know, look,

187
00:10:09.000 --> 00:10:12.279
<v Speaker 3>there is nobody, there is nobody who knows better about

188
00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the failures of our justice system than you, as you

189
00:10:15.120 --> 00:10:21.080
<v Speaker 3>have become you know, the the authority on the failures

190
00:10:21.200 --> 00:10:25.879
<v Speaker 3>of this government to really properly navigate the Epstein situation,

191
00:10:26.360 --> 00:10:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Like this is not a justice system or a judicial

192
00:10:28.679 --> 00:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>system that is that is properly equipped to be able

193
00:10:31.639 --> 00:10:35.559
<v Speaker 3>to hold the Trump administration to account for suppressing these files.

194
00:10:35.720 --> 00:10:38.799
<v Speaker 3>It's not a justice system that's equipped to hold these

195
00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:41.840
<v Speaker 3>people to account for what they've actually done, the co

196
00:10:41.840 --> 00:10:46.440
<v Speaker 3>conspirators for the pedophile ring itself. I mean, you have

197
00:10:46.480 --> 00:10:49.519
<v Speaker 3>been You've been doing stellar reporting. Thank God for you,

198
00:10:49.559 --> 00:10:51.720
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise we wouldn't be in a situation where we're

199
00:10:51.759 --> 00:10:54.960
<v Speaker 3>going to have any transparency as relates to the outstanding

200
00:10:55.039 --> 00:10:58.320
<v Speaker 3>three million files. So, but we're just not equipped right

201
00:10:58.360 --> 00:11:00.519
<v Speaker 3>now to be able to do this. And the fact

202
00:11:00.559 --> 00:11:02.919
<v Speaker 3>that we needed you from the outside to be able

203
00:11:02.960 --> 00:11:05.320
<v Speaker 3>to put enough leverage on the dj to actually get

204
00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:07.519
<v Speaker 3>these people in court to have to answer for what

205
00:11:07.559 --> 00:11:11.320
<v Speaker 3>they're doing right now, I think is yes, a huge

206
00:11:11.320 --> 00:11:14.399
<v Speaker 3>testament to the importance of independent media and somebody like you.

207
00:11:14.679 --> 00:11:16.440
<v Speaker 3>But really, at the same time, it's a it's a

208
00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:20.639
<v Speaker 3>condemnation of our of our of our system as a

209
00:11:20.639 --> 00:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>whole that it takes this to actually get to this

210
00:11:23.720 --> 00:11:26.639
<v Speaker 3>point where the Attorney General has to follow the plain

211
00:11:26.679 --> 00:11:27.440
<v Speaker 3>text of the law.

212
00:11:28.720 --> 00:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's another big aspect of your book, which

213
00:11:31.960 --> 00:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is I'm unabashedly and I'll use this adjective mackia Vellen

214
00:11:37.759 --> 00:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes about the need to be back in a seat

215
00:11:41.240 --> 00:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of power, because you can't affect the change that you

216
00:11:43.320 --> 00:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>want until you're actually there.

217
00:11:45.639 --> 00:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not ruthless.

218
00:11:48.120 --> 00:11:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I still have morals and I still have

219
00:11:50.240 --> 00:11:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a compass about it, Brian. But one of the things

220
00:11:52.639 --> 00:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that you acknowledge is it's been a fatal flaw for

221
00:11:56.360 --> 00:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>many a campaign. Thus far as a Democrat, we have

222
00:12:00.679 --> 00:12:07.919
<v Speaker 1>been way too nice about things. I think that we

223
00:12:08.080 --> 00:12:14.399
<v Speaker 1>have been way too holier than now about not being

224
00:12:14.480 --> 00:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to fight. And I do think that is part

225
00:12:17.519 --> 00:12:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of why you have seen a surge and support for

226
00:12:21.320 --> 00:12:25.039
<v Speaker 1>the quote more progressive side of our party, that part

227
00:12:25.080 --> 00:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of our big tent, because they have been just so

228
00:12:30.759 --> 00:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>overtly like in our faces in a good way. I'm

229
00:12:35.399 --> 00:12:37.519
<v Speaker 1>not sure that it's a fucking radical to say that

230
00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>my kids should have health care and I should be

231
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>able to afford basic necessities, Like why is it so radical?

232
00:12:42.120 --> 00:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Because it's not. And I do think we've kind of.

233
00:12:44.279 --> 00:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Tried to shame that part of our party for being

234
00:12:47.000 --> 00:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so outspoken about it, and yet that's kind of what

235
00:12:49.639 --> 00:12:51.519
<v Speaker 1>we need to be doing. We need to be acknowledging

236
00:12:51.559 --> 00:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that we should not be okay with crumbs, like we

237
00:12:53.480 --> 00:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>deserve the whole pie.

238
00:12:54.799 --> 00:12:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Right and look, they're mad, and rightfully so they should be.

239
00:12:58.519 --> 00:13:01.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think in large part the reason that the

240
00:13:01.039 --> 00:13:04.559
<v Speaker 3>progressive flank of the party is acendant right now is is,

241
00:13:04.600 --> 00:13:07.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's multiple reasons. One you have the more

242
00:13:08.879 --> 00:13:12.440
<v Speaker 3>like the liberal Democrats who don't even offer a bridge

243
00:13:12.440 --> 00:13:15.360
<v Speaker 3>to the next generation. These people stay in their seats forever.

244
00:13:15.480 --> 00:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we have people into their seventies and eighties,

245
00:13:18.279 --> 00:13:20.120
<v Speaker 3>and there's people in office that are in the sh

246
00:13:20.159 --> 00:13:21.200
<v Speaker 3>of their nineties right now.

247
00:13:21.279 --> 00:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Just see Chuck Chuck Well, he's not one of but

248
00:13:23.240 --> 00:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Grassley just filed for his seat again. That guy

249
00:13:26.480 --> 00:13:28.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to be like freaking ninety seven or some

250
00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:30.639
<v Speaker 1>copper like that. By the time the dude's done. It's crazy.

251
00:13:30.879 --> 00:13:32.679
<v Speaker 3>And the sad part is like, we don't even have

252
00:13:32.759 --> 00:13:34.519
<v Speaker 3>a leg to stand on when it comes to condemning

253
00:13:34.559 --> 00:13:36.919
<v Speaker 3>that kind of stuff, because we've had Ruth Vader Ginsburg

254
00:13:36.960 --> 00:13:40.080
<v Speaker 3>die in office. We had Joe Biden obviously very old

255
00:13:40.080 --> 00:13:41.399
<v Speaker 3>when he was an offit to the point where he

256
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:43.679
<v Speaker 3>wasn't able to prosecute the case when he was in

257
00:13:43.720 --> 00:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that disastrous debate two summers ago, and so you know

258
00:13:47.039 --> 00:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>this is this is a problem, certainly on both sides

259
00:13:49.159 --> 00:13:51.039
<v Speaker 3>of the island. I'm the last person that's ever gonna

260
00:13:51.279 --> 00:13:54.240
<v Speaker 3>lean on the both sides excuse, but I do think

261
00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>it's a problem. And and you know, you do have

262
00:13:57.120 --> 00:14:00.360
<v Speaker 3>a large faction of the base for whom this idea

263
00:14:00.399 --> 00:14:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of politics as usual, which is espoused by these people

264
00:14:03.000 --> 00:14:07.080
<v Speaker 3>who have been in Washington forever, is just not garnering

265
00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>enough results. And I think that we do need to

266
00:14:10.120 --> 00:14:12.000
<v Speaker 3>abridge the next generation, and we need to bridge the

267
00:14:12.000 --> 00:14:14.639
<v Speaker 3>next generation that's actually going to recognize the opponent that

268
00:14:14.679 --> 00:14:17.919
<v Speaker 3>we're contenting with. These are not people that we can say,

269
00:14:18.600 --> 00:14:20.399
<v Speaker 3>let's just confer a little bit of goodwill to the

270
00:14:20.440 --> 00:14:23.919
<v Speaker 3>other side and surely, surely they'll reciprocate, because they don't.

271
00:14:24.120 --> 00:14:26.279
<v Speaker 3>And we've been trying this game over and over and

272
00:14:26.320 --> 00:14:30.679
<v Speaker 3>over again and they never reciprocate. And and I just

273
00:14:30.720 --> 00:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>want to like bring into office people who recognize that

274
00:14:33.879 --> 00:14:36.519
<v Speaker 3>this is not the Republican party our of our parents

275
00:14:36.600 --> 00:14:38.039
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it is they like to say, this is

276
00:14:38.080 --> 00:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>a republican party that again, to repeat myself from the beginning,

277
00:14:41.120 --> 00:14:44.120
<v Speaker 3>does not think Democrats have the right to exist does

278
00:14:44.159 --> 00:14:46.440
<v Speaker 3>not think that Democrats have the right to get elected.

279
00:14:46.679 --> 00:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>And so if we don't start treating this government like that,

280
00:14:49.440 --> 00:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>we're we are going to good government ourselves into obscurity.

281
00:14:53.519 --> 00:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You know. I love what you just said, that we're

282
00:14:55.240 --> 00:14:58.559
<v Speaker 1>going to good government ourselves into ourselves into obscurity, because

283
00:14:58.799 --> 00:15:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that we like to give ourselves sometimes as Democrats,

284
00:15:02.759 --> 00:15:05.399
<v Speaker 1>like self congratutory paths on the back for being so much,

285
00:15:05.480 --> 00:15:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, better and more noble about things. But I

286
00:15:08.399 --> 00:15:10.919
<v Speaker 1>think we now have a very different definition of what

287
00:15:10.960 --> 00:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that means, right, because again, I don't have to be

288
00:15:14.000 --> 00:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>apologetic for wanting the basics and then wanting more, because

289
00:15:18.120 --> 00:15:20.039
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what this country was built on, the

290
00:15:20.080 --> 00:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>idea of me being able to have a dream, but

291
00:15:23.399 --> 00:15:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to be able to actually have the basics to get there, right,

292
00:15:26.240 --> 00:15:29.279
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like we've just kind of what is

293
00:15:29.320 --> 00:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it just this is kind of like half jokingly not really.

294
00:15:32.639 --> 00:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I was in Paris right and I was having like

295
00:15:34.399 --> 00:15:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a work vacation and people were jokingly saying Parisians are like, oh,

296
00:15:38.960 --> 00:15:41.399
<v Speaker 1>we're French, you know, we we we like to suffer.

297
00:15:42.320 --> 00:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, holy shit, I feel like the Democrat

298
00:15:44.639 --> 00:15:46.879
<v Speaker 1>like we like to suffer because we're Democrats, Like, no,

299
00:15:46.919 --> 00:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to fucking suffer.

300
00:15:48.240 --> 00:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to thrive.

301
00:15:49.720 --> 00:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Like what is so hard to understand about that concept?

302
00:15:53.559 --> 00:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think that that like you you you hit

303
00:15:56.360 --> 00:15:59.759
<v Speaker 3>your your your finger right on it, which is there

304
00:15:59.879 --> 00:16:03.240
<v Speaker 3>is a sense that we will always get just to

305
00:16:03.279 --> 00:16:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the five yard line and then fail, Like there's a

306
00:16:05.879 --> 00:16:08.519
<v Speaker 3>sense that that there's always going to be something that

307
00:16:08.600 --> 00:16:11.320
<v Speaker 3>comes up the works, whether it's the parliamentarian or some

308
00:16:11.480 --> 00:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>norm or some institution or Kirsten Cinema or Joe Manchin,

309
00:16:15.399 --> 00:16:19.679
<v Speaker 3>there's always one person who screws everything up. And we've

310
00:16:19.679 --> 00:16:21.600
<v Speaker 3>gotten to the point where it almost feels like it's

311
00:16:21.639 --> 00:16:24.159
<v Speaker 3>good enough that we got caught trying, that we had

312
00:16:24.200 --> 00:16:27.399
<v Speaker 3>some symbolic victory in that if only we you know,

313
00:16:27.440 --> 00:16:29.960
<v Speaker 3>like if only Kirsten Cinema wasn't there, if only Joe

314
00:16:30.039 --> 00:16:32.519
<v Speaker 3>Mansion wasn't there, we would have gotten everything. But there's

315
00:16:32.559 --> 00:16:35.200
<v Speaker 3>always one person to stop things. And I think people

316
00:16:35.200 --> 00:16:37.279
<v Speaker 3>are just so tired of that. And in large part

317
00:16:37.320 --> 00:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the reason that they're tired of that is because Trump

318
00:16:39.960 --> 00:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>has shown that none of our institutions are sacker sanct

319
00:16:43.360 --> 00:16:45.799
<v Speaker 3>like when he wants to do something, he just gets

320
00:16:45.799 --> 00:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>it done. He doesn't care what the constitution says. He

321
00:16:48.360 --> 00:16:50.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't care what prosecutor say. It doesn't care what the

322
00:16:50.120 --> 00:16:52.919
<v Speaker 3>court say, what judges say, what other members of Congress

323
00:16:53.000 --> 00:16:55.840
<v Speaker 3>or Senate or other full branches of government says. He

324
00:16:55.960 --> 00:16:59.600
<v Speaker 3>just does it. And so it shows that like where

325
00:16:59.639 --> 00:17:02.879
<v Speaker 3>there is a will in politics, there's a way. And

326
00:17:04.400 --> 00:17:06.319
<v Speaker 3>my argument in this book is that we have to

327
00:17:06.359 --> 00:17:09.440
<v Speaker 3>have that same degree of ruthlessness, but you can do

328
00:17:09.519 --> 00:17:11.720
<v Speaker 3>it for virtuous reasons. Not to enrich yourself to the

329
00:17:11.720 --> 00:17:15.319
<v Speaker 3>tune of three hundred percent, not to keep billions of

330
00:17:15.359 --> 00:17:18.440
<v Speaker 3>dollars in military defense contracts onto your kids, not to

331
00:17:18.599 --> 00:17:21.480
<v Speaker 3>sell crypto coins or open real estate deals in foreign countries,

332
00:17:21.480 --> 00:17:23.920
<v Speaker 3>but just to pass healthcare, like just to make sure

333
00:17:23.960 --> 00:17:26.720
<v Speaker 3>we get climate change, just to expand voting rights, just

334
00:17:26.720 --> 00:17:29.079
<v Speaker 3>to raise the minimum wage. If Trump can do all

335
00:17:29.119 --> 00:17:32.880
<v Speaker 3>of these things to keep ungodly sums of money into

336
00:17:32.880 --> 00:17:36.200
<v Speaker 3>his own pockets, surely democrats can do it when they're

337
00:17:36.200 --> 00:17:38.519
<v Speaker 3>in control, so that we can raise the minimum wage

338
00:17:38.519 --> 00:17:40.680
<v Speaker 3>from seven dollars and twenty five cents an hour to

339
00:17:40.799 --> 00:17:42.920
<v Speaker 3>something livable in this country.

340
00:17:43.599 --> 00:17:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, and then that is that therein lies the rub right,

341
00:17:47.000 --> 00:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want to lose your soul. We can't

342
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:53.759
<v Speaker 1>lose our souls in pursuit of this. But as long

343
00:17:53.799 --> 00:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>as you're doing.

344
00:17:54.440 --> 00:17:57.319
<v Speaker 2>It for the right reasons, I'm okay with it.

345
00:17:57.400 --> 00:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Right and so that is the reason why I believe,

346
00:18:01.000 --> 00:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>and I want to ask you, I mean, so is

347
00:18:04.160 --> 00:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the premise of your book the idea of not even

348
00:18:09.680 --> 00:18:11.559
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I hate using the word rebuild because it

349
00:18:11.559 --> 00:18:13.839
<v Speaker 1>makes us feel like we're looking at the old foundations,

350
00:18:13.839 --> 00:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because we're not. I mean, your book is very clear

351
00:18:16.079 --> 00:18:19.559
<v Speaker 1>like whatever we've been doing before doesn't work. We've seen

352
00:18:19.599 --> 00:18:22.079
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work. We have empirical evidence historically we need

353
00:18:22.119 --> 00:18:26.319
<v Speaker 1>to change the rules of engagement. Here is that success

354
00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:30.759
<v Speaker 1>though the day after and moving forward conditioned upon making

355
00:18:30.799 --> 00:18:33.319
<v Speaker 1>sure that we have the right people in place to

356
00:18:33.400 --> 00:18:35.559
<v Speaker 1>do that. And I'm not talking just in Congress. I'm

357
00:18:35.559 --> 00:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>talking in other kind of industry spaces and other sectors.

358
00:18:39.880 --> 00:18:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So having the right people in place. Look, we're going

359
00:18:43.039 --> 00:18:45.240
<v Speaker 3>to have to contend with both. There are going to

360
00:18:45.279 --> 00:18:49.799
<v Speaker 3>be institutionalists and establishment types who are perfectly content with

361
00:18:49.839 --> 00:18:53.599
<v Speaker 3>the status quo in positions of power where we need

362
00:18:53.640 --> 00:18:57.440
<v Speaker 3>them to be movable and flexible so that we can

363
00:18:57.519 --> 00:18:59.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of achieve some of the change that we're looking

364
00:18:59.319 --> 00:19:02.240
<v Speaker 3>to see. My goal with the book is is twofold.

365
00:19:03.079 --> 00:19:06.319
<v Speaker 3>It's of course, to advocate for a new generation of

366
00:19:06.359 --> 00:19:11.400
<v Speaker 3>people who are actually going to really embody this fight

367
00:19:11.440 --> 00:19:13.160
<v Speaker 3>that I want to see on the left or in

368
00:19:13.160 --> 00:19:15.839
<v Speaker 3>this pro democracy space, but at a bare minimum, knowing

369
00:19:15.920 --> 00:19:17.279
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to have a lot of folks who

370
00:19:17.359 --> 00:19:19.200
<v Speaker 3>are already in power right now and by the way,

371
00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:22.559
<v Speaker 3>benefiting from the systems remaining as they are, is at

372
00:19:22.640 --> 00:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>least to push them to let them know what we

373
00:19:24.839 --> 00:19:29.000
<v Speaker 3>expect as the base. And look, I have I think

374
00:19:29.039 --> 00:19:31.359
<v Speaker 3>a distinct advantage in this space because I talk to

375
00:19:31.440 --> 00:19:33.599
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these people over the course of the

376
00:19:33.680 --> 00:19:36.519
<v Speaker 3>last few years in these interviews, and so you know,

377
00:19:36.759 --> 00:19:40.319
<v Speaker 3>I might not be viewed as as radically as some

378
00:19:40.359 --> 00:19:43.279
<v Speaker 3>of these elected officials view other folks that they talk to.

379
00:19:43.519 --> 00:19:45.400
<v Speaker 3>And so if I can be a trusted messenger for

380
00:19:45.440 --> 00:19:47.839
<v Speaker 3>people and let them know that what we expect is

381
00:19:47.920 --> 00:19:50.960
<v Speaker 3>not the same incrementalism that we've come to expect up

382
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:53.359
<v Speaker 3>to now, then hopefully I can use some of that

383
00:19:53.400 --> 00:19:56.240
<v Speaker 3>credibility that I've earned with these people to let them

384
00:19:56.240 --> 00:20:00.279
<v Speaker 3>know what a democratic party of tomorrow should look like,

385
00:20:00.400 --> 00:20:02.559
<v Speaker 3>which is to say, a democratic party that is not

386
00:20:02.640 --> 00:20:06.839
<v Speaker 3>going to just rely on institutions or processes or norms

387
00:20:06.880 --> 00:20:10.759
<v Speaker 3>or traditions or god forbid, we push aside the parliamentarian

388
00:20:10.839 --> 00:20:16.920
<v Speaker 3>God forbid, we don't embrace the filibuster like I'm using.

389
00:20:17.079 --> 00:20:19.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm using any street cred that I had gained over

390
00:20:19.599 --> 00:20:22.039
<v Speaker 3>the last few years building relationships with these people to

391
00:20:22.119 --> 00:20:23.720
<v Speaker 3>let them know that what we've been doing up to

392
00:20:23.759 --> 00:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>now is not going to be acceptable beyond twenty twenty eight.

393
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's the reason why you are a trusted voice,

394
00:20:30.039 --> 00:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not only in independent media but also in other you know, spaces.

395
00:20:33.759 --> 00:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It's important for us to know how to walk in

396
00:20:37.480 --> 00:20:41.039
<v Speaker 1>all these worlds. And you know the thing that makes

397
00:20:41.039 --> 00:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>me happy though, it sounds like there might be a

398
00:20:42.480 --> 00:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>place for an old lady like me in your day

399
00:20:44.759 --> 00:20:46.079
<v Speaker 1>after Brian Tyler Cohen.

400
00:20:46.119 --> 00:20:48.599
<v Speaker 2>So I'm grateful for this. Listen, my friend, I don't think.

401
00:20:48.720 --> 00:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Before you stop. You there you have like I know

402
00:20:53.480 --> 00:20:55.079
<v Speaker 3>that you are going to be that you're going to

403
00:20:55.119 --> 00:20:58.240
<v Speaker 3>be very modest, but like I just want the audi

404
00:20:58.359 --> 00:21:00.519
<v Speaker 3>and I know that your audience knows this, that's why

405
00:21:00.359 --> 00:21:04.000
<v Speaker 3>they watch you. But but you, your voice could not

406
00:21:04.039 --> 00:21:06.640
<v Speaker 3>be more important right now in one of the premiere

407
00:21:06.720 --> 00:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>issues that we're contending with. If it wasn't for you,

408
00:21:09.519 --> 00:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>not only would would we have so little insight into

409
00:21:13.759 --> 00:21:15.880
<v Speaker 3>into one of the most heinous crimes that that is

410
00:21:15.920 --> 00:21:19.440
<v Speaker 3>being covered up right now, but the victims of those

411
00:21:19.480 --> 00:21:22.480
<v Speaker 3>heinous crimes are going to get some degree of justice

412
00:21:22.680 --> 00:21:25.160
<v Speaker 3>thanks to the work that you're doing and the precedent

413
00:21:25.160 --> 00:21:28.640
<v Speaker 3>by the way that it will establish in allowing other

414
00:21:29.000 --> 00:21:31.599
<v Speaker 3>independent journalists to step in and say, now we have

415
00:21:31.839 --> 00:21:34.279
<v Speaker 3>the right as well to see some stuff that's being

416
00:21:34.599 --> 00:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>suppressed by this government. So the the tail of what

417
00:21:39.160 --> 00:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>you're doing, tail of what you're doing is going to

418
00:21:42.799 --> 00:21:47.440
<v Speaker 3>have long standing implications for for for not only the survivors,

419
00:21:47.480 --> 00:21:50.920
<v Speaker 3>but you know, to get some accountability and transparency on

420
00:21:51.319 --> 00:21:54.640
<v Speaker 3>the corruption that this administration is engaging in. So I'm

421
00:21:54.799 --> 00:21:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm very happy to be here talking to you, and

422
00:21:57.200 --> 00:21:58.839
<v Speaker 3>and I know I speak on behalf of your entire

423
00:21:58.839 --> 00:22:00.759
<v Speaker 3>audience and saying thank you the work that you do

424
00:22:00.839 --> 00:22:01.839
<v Speaker 3>every single day.

425
00:22:02.119 --> 00:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I appreciate that. And look, it takes it literally

426
00:22:04.920 --> 00:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>takes a village and then some it takes an internet

427
00:22:07.559 --> 00:22:13.079
<v Speaker 1>to make stuff happen. But not only your YouTube channel

428
00:22:13.200 --> 00:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and all of the work that you're doing, but especially

429
00:22:15.079 --> 00:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your books are essential reading or go the reason why

430
00:22:17.000 --> 00:22:18.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling everybody that they have to read this book,

431
00:22:18.640 --> 00:22:20.279
<v Speaker 1>especially this book. I love your other book too, but

432
00:22:20.319 --> 00:22:23.079
<v Speaker 1>this one, especially for me, really was a siren song.

433
00:22:23.240 --> 00:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>So Brian Tyler Cohen, tell folks where they can actually

434
00:22:26.160 --> 00:22:27.079
<v Speaker 1>go and get The Day After.

435
00:22:27.599 --> 00:22:30.039
<v Speaker 3>You can get it anywhere books are sold. If you

436
00:22:30.039 --> 00:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>want an easy link, I have it at Briantylercohen dot

437
00:22:32.920 --> 00:22:34.039
<v Speaker 3>com slash book.

438
00:22:34.599 --> 00:22:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we're going to include all of those links

439
00:22:36.559 --> 00:22:38.319
<v Speaker 1>here with this episode.

440
00:22:38.359 --> 00:22:40.359
<v Speaker 2>But Brian, it was good to see you in DC.

441
00:22:40.559 --> 00:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I was thrilled that we were able to hang out

442
00:22:42.519 --> 00:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and be, like I said, in community with others. But

443
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this is an incredibly important conversation because a lot of

444
00:22:48.680 --> 00:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>people want to have actionable they want to actionable blueprint.

445
00:22:53.240 --> 00:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>They want to have some action items to embrace and

446
00:22:55.279 --> 00:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to know that we don't have a dog catching the

447
00:22:58.279 --> 00:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>car moment. And then we're all like looking at each other, like, well,

448
00:23:00.880 --> 00:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>now what do we do? What we do is we

449
00:23:02.920 --> 00:23:05.759
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we've read The Day After by Brian

450
00:23:06.000 --> 00:23:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Cohen. Thanks for being here, my friend.

451
00:23:07.680 --> 00:23:10.039
<v Speaker 2>Was good to see you Katy, Thanks so much, Katie Fang.

452
00:23:10.079 --> 00:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Here we launched the Katifang News Channel in partnership with

453
00:23:13.039 --> 00:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the Midas Touch Network, so we can bring you the

454
00:23:15.079 --> 00:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>latest in legal and political news, straight no chaser. So

455
00:23:18.720 --> 00:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're a fellow truthteller, hit that subscribe button and

456
00:23:21.599 --> 00:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>share the word about this channel so we can build

457
00:23:24.400 --> 00:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a high information America together. Things are spicing up in

458
00:23:28.440 --> 00:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cash paateel versus the Atlantic defamation lawsuit that he

459
00:23:32.480 --> 00:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>brought after this article check Out Your Screen came out

460
00:23:36.039 --> 00:23:40.079
<v Speaker 1>on April seventeenth, twenty twenty six, entitled the FBI Director

461
00:23:40.279 --> 00:23:44.319
<v Speaker 1>is Mia Cash. Patel has alarmed colleagues with episodes of

462
00:23:44.359 --> 00:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>excessive drinking and unexplained absences. Now, Patel has been an

463
00:23:49.000 --> 00:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>unsuccessful litigant for several defamation lawsuits, one of which was

464
00:23:52.960 --> 00:23:55.839
<v Speaker 1>brought against my friend Frank Figluzi, who was a national

465
00:23:55.880 --> 00:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>security analyst and former FBI specialist and agent who is

466
00:24:00.720 --> 00:24:05.559
<v Speaker 1>often on places like MSNBC and Cash Battel sued Frank

467
00:24:05.599 --> 00:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for a defamation and lost resoundingly his defamation lawsuit. But

468
00:24:10.720 --> 00:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of a big deal because, as we know,

469
00:24:13.440 --> 00:24:16.799
<v Speaker 1>there is a very thin skinned sensitivity when it comes

470
00:24:16.880 --> 00:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>to members of the cabinet and members of the Trump regime,

471
00:24:20.480 --> 00:24:23.839
<v Speaker 1>especially the second time around. Cash Battel not being an

472
00:24:23.839 --> 00:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>outlier on this whatsoever, Donald Trump himself loves, loves a

473
00:24:28.240 --> 00:24:30.559
<v Speaker 1>defamation lawsuit. And then when it gets just on the

474
00:24:30.599 --> 00:24:32.759
<v Speaker 1>even him having to I don't know, testify in a

475
00:24:32.799 --> 00:24:36.599
<v Speaker 1>sworn deposition under oath on camera, suddenly the lawsuit seem

476
00:24:36.640 --> 00:24:38.519
<v Speaker 1>to disappear anyway, even if.

477
00:24:38.480 --> 00:24:39.440
<v Speaker 2>They get that far right.

478
00:24:39.640 --> 00:24:42.759
<v Speaker 1>So cash Batel labors under the same fatal flaws he's

479
00:24:42.759 --> 00:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>bringing these defamation lawsuits. They do not hold any water,

480
00:24:45.799 --> 00:24:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and they are being dismissed. Now that's exactly what the

481
00:24:48.880 --> 00:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic is trying to do here. Check out your screen.

482
00:24:51.880 --> 00:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>There is a motion to dismiss that has been filed

483
00:24:54.559 --> 00:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>by the Atlantic, and this was at the end of July,

484
00:24:57.319 --> 00:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>July twenty seventh, and it basically says that, pursuing to

485
00:25:01.200 --> 00:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a rule of civil procedure in the federal system, that

486
00:25:04.519 --> 00:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>there is no viable defamation claim that has been asserted

487
00:25:08.440 --> 00:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>by cash Battel against not only The Atlantic the publication,

488
00:25:12.599 --> 00:25:16.079
<v Speaker 1>but against Sarah Fitzpatrick, who's the author of that article.

489
00:25:16.480 --> 00:25:19.039
<v Speaker 1>And if you check out the memorandum of points and

490
00:25:19.039 --> 00:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>authorities in support of the motion to dismiss complaint that

491
00:25:21.839 --> 00:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>was filed by the defendants, The Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick.

492
00:25:25.240 --> 00:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It's scathing in its assertions, both legally and factually. We're

493
00:25:31.680 --> 00:25:34.279
<v Speaker 1>going to fast forward to page nine of the forty

494
00:25:34.319 --> 00:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>two page motion to dismiss memorandum. Now it states clearly

495
00:25:39.240 --> 00:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the cash Battel has failed to state a claim, meaning

496
00:25:42.400 --> 00:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>he has not asserted the necessary elements of a cause

497
00:25:46.400 --> 00:25:48.519
<v Speaker 1>of action for defamation.

498
00:25:48.400 --> 00:25:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Against the defendants.

499
00:25:50.039 --> 00:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And he brought this defamation action against The Atlantic because

500
00:25:53.960 --> 00:25:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it published quote an undeniably newsworthy article about his job

501
00:25:57.839 --> 00:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>performance that he finds politically inconvenie. It is an assault

502
00:26:01.480 --> 00:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>by a man who swore to uphold the Constitution. The

503
00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:08.799
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit is meritless and should be dismissed. And it basically

504
00:26:08.880 --> 00:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>says here that this article reported on cash Battel's tenure

505
00:26:15.480 --> 00:26:19.039
<v Speaker 1>at the FBI, concerns raised by those around him about

506
00:26:19.039 --> 00:26:23.519
<v Speaker 1>his behavior, including excessive drinking, frequent absences, mishandling of high

507
00:26:23.519 --> 00:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>profile investigations, purging of employees that are deemed to be quote, disloyal,

508
00:26:28.000 --> 00:26:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and impulsive decision making. The article in the Atlantic was

509
00:26:32.880 --> 00:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>based upon Sarah Fitzpatrick's interviews of more than two dozen sources,

510
00:26:37.640 --> 00:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>including current and former FBI officials, staff at law enforcement

511
00:26:41.400 --> 00:26:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and intelligence agencies, hospitality industry workers, members of Congress, political operatives, lobbyists,

512
00:26:47.599 --> 00:26:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and former advisors. And it also included the denials that

513
00:26:51.359 --> 00:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>were made by cash Battel and other Trump administration officials.

514
00:26:55.839 --> 00:26:56.839
<v Speaker 2>And here is the.

515
00:26:56.720 --> 00:27:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Crux of why the court should dismiss cash Betel's defamation lawsuit.

516
00:27:01.160 --> 00:27:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Because cash Battel does not and cannot state a viable

517
00:27:05.640 --> 00:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>defamation claim against The Atlantic and its reporter Patel, does

518
00:27:10.200 --> 00:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>not plausibly allege that the defendants published the article with

519
00:27:13.319 --> 00:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>quote actual malice, as is required by the First Amendment.

520
00:27:17.720 --> 00:27:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Cash Betel's complaint is just a laundry list of conclusiory

521
00:27:21.119 --> 00:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>allegations and generic complaints and does not come close to

522
00:27:25.720 --> 00:27:29.519
<v Speaker 1>meeting the high constitutional standard, and the Court canon should

523
00:27:29.519 --> 00:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>dismiss the complaint in its entirety on those grounds alone.

524
00:27:34.400 --> 00:27:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Cash Betel's claims also fail as to several of the

525
00:27:37.880 --> 00:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>alleged defamatory statements for the additional and independent reason that

526
00:27:42.759 --> 00:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the statements are not able to be sued upon as

527
00:27:45.920 --> 00:27:48.759
<v Speaker 1>a matter of law because they are not defamatory, they

528
00:27:48.799 --> 00:27:52.319
<v Speaker 1>are substantially true, or they are protected by a fair

529
00:27:52.400 --> 00:27:55.759
<v Speaker 1>report privilege in DC. Now, I mentioned a couple of

530
00:27:55.759 --> 00:28:00.559
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago the lawsuit that Cash Betel brought against Frank Fuglisi, Well,

531
00:28:01.839 --> 00:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit against The Atlantic, Patel's fifth in recent years

532
00:28:06.200 --> 00:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for defamation, and the second that he has brought since

533
00:28:09.960 --> 00:28:12.799
<v Speaker 1>he's been sworn in as the FBI director. And you

534
00:28:12.799 --> 00:28:15.039
<v Speaker 1>guys know that I love a good footnote. Let's check

535
00:28:15.039 --> 00:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>out footnote two here that says, hey, Patel versus Fugleisi

536
00:28:20.839 --> 00:28:24.759
<v Speaker 1>dismissed pursu into the same rule of civil procedure twelve

537
00:28:24.839 --> 00:28:28.319
<v Speaker 1>B six that The Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick are traveling

538
00:28:28.400 --> 00:28:32.079
<v Speaker 1>under to get rid of Cash Betel's lawsuit here and

539
00:28:32.119 --> 00:28:37.079
<v Speaker 1>then it notes Cash Betel sued CNN AH dismissed with prejudice.

540
00:28:37.400 --> 00:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Sued Goldman and others seeking forty five million from The

541
00:28:41.000 --> 00:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Times and its reporter for defamation and conspiracy

542
00:28:45.559 --> 00:28:49.759
<v Speaker 1>voluntarily dismissed without any court action being taken by the court.

543
00:28:50.240 --> 00:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Patel versus Politico seeking twenty five million dollars.

544
00:28:54.240 --> 00:28:55.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that one.

545
00:28:55.480 --> 00:28:58.519
<v Speaker 1>Also voluntarily dismissed prior to any court action. So again,

546
00:28:59.160 --> 00:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this should be the fifth failure by Patel to successfully

547
00:29:03.759 --> 00:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>bring a defamation lawsuit.

548
00:29:07.160 --> 00:29:09.039
<v Speaker 2>But the defendants go even.

549
00:29:08.960 --> 00:29:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Farther and they call out cash Battel here for the

550
00:29:12.400 --> 00:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>quote ominous message he is sending to the press. If

551
00:29:16.000 --> 00:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you publish reporting that he doesn't like, it will come

552
00:29:18.960 --> 00:29:22.279
<v Speaker 1>at a high cost. These tactics strike at the very

553
00:29:22.319 --> 00:29:25.279
<v Speaker 1>foundation of the First Amendment, which was adopted to prevent

554
00:29:25.359 --> 00:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>powerful government officials like Cash Battel from controlling the public

555
00:29:29.279 --> 00:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>narrative by published by punishing the dissemination of material that

556
00:29:32.799 --> 00:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is embarrassing to the powers that be. There is a

557
00:29:36.759 --> 00:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>chilling effect when lawsuits of this kind are brought, because

558
00:29:40.440 --> 00:29:43.759
<v Speaker 1>if a suit entails long and expensive litigation, then the

559
00:29:43.759 --> 00:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>protective purpose of the First Amendment is thwarted, even if

560
00:29:46.400 --> 00:29:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the defendant ultimately prevails. So they ask the court to

561
00:29:50.119 --> 00:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>dismiss cash Betel's defamation lawsuit with prejudice, meaning that once

562
00:29:53.759 --> 00:29:56.599
<v Speaker 1>it's dismissed, he cannot ever revive it and bring it

563
00:29:56.640 --> 00:29:59.599
<v Speaker 1>back in any way. And this is interesting because normally,

564
00:30:00.039 --> 00:30:02.279
<v Speaker 1>as we've talked about here at Katie Fang News, a

565
00:30:02.400 --> 00:30:05.119
<v Speaker 1>motion to dismiss is usually granted at the first instance,

566
00:30:05.160 --> 00:30:08.519
<v Speaker 1>without prejudice, the court gives a plaintiff the opportunity to

567
00:30:08.559 --> 00:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>try to cure the defects and try to bring it

568
00:30:10.519 --> 00:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>again in light of why it was.

569
00:30:12.359 --> 00:30:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Dismissed in the first place.

570
00:30:13.799 --> 00:30:17.079
<v Speaker 1>But what The Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick are asserting here

571
00:30:17.440 --> 00:30:19.759
<v Speaker 1>is that there's no way that cash Betel will ever

572
00:30:19.799 --> 00:30:22.519
<v Speaker 1>be able to successfully assert a defamation claim against them

573
00:30:22.759 --> 00:30:26.359
<v Speaker 1>because of this article, and that it should never Cashptel

574
00:30:26.359 --> 00:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>should never be given the chance to try to do

575
00:30:28.240 --> 00:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it again. And to be clear, Sarah Fitzpatrick made substantial

576
00:30:32.720 --> 00:30:35.039
<v Speaker 1>efforts to get comment from not only Patel, but the

577
00:30:35.079 --> 00:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>FBI and the DOJ, sending a detailed nineteen point summary

578
00:30:38.680 --> 00:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of what the article was going to say, and she

579
00:30:40.799 --> 00:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sent it to all of these different offices of public

580
00:30:42.920 --> 00:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>affairs to get their comments. She said, let me know

581
00:30:46.960 --> 00:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you have a response, or whether there's additional context.

582
00:30:49.680 --> 00:30:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Or information you can share.

583
00:30:53.039 --> 00:30:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Listen, what she got back was either a platitude about

584
00:30:56.839 --> 00:30:59.039
<v Speaker 1>how amazing cash Battel is and what a great job

585
00:30:59.079 --> 00:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he's doing, or a general denial of these are lies.

586
00:31:02.599 --> 00:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>And you shouldn't be printing them. And that's the crux

587
00:31:05.000 --> 00:31:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of it.

588
00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, what just happened the other day, though, is cash

589
00:31:08.680 --> 00:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Betel filed this his opposition to the defendant's motion to

590
00:31:11.880 --> 00:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>dismiss the complaint, and what cash Betel asserts, starting on

591
00:31:15.960 --> 00:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>page seven of this thirty nine page pdf, is the

592
00:31:18.240 --> 00:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>following that the defendant's punished published a hit piece knowing

593
00:31:21.960 --> 00:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it was false when they published it. They were told

594
00:31:24.279 --> 00:31:27.079
<v Speaker 1>it was false by multiple official sources, but they published

595
00:31:27.119 --> 00:31:29.599
<v Speaker 1>it anyway, and now they can't hide behind the First

596
00:31:29.599 --> 00:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Amendment and ask the court to believe that their conduct

597
00:31:32.440 --> 00:31:36.519
<v Speaker 1>constituted legitimate journalism. According to cash Betel, it did not.

598
00:31:38.319 --> 00:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I adore my Jones, Rude miracle Bomb, my collar, Mimi Beach.

599
00:31:42.039 --> 00:31:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Of course, miracle Bomb has replaced multiple steps in my

600
00:31:44.920 --> 00:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>daily routine. Now I just grabbed my miracle bomb and

601
00:31:47.160 --> 00:31:50.039
<v Speaker 1>I've got a highlighter, Bronzer, blush and liptint in one

602
00:31:50.119 --> 00:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing product in less than sixty seconds. And with the

603
00:31:53.319 --> 00:31:55.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of hectic life I live, who wouldn't want to

604
00:31:55.279 --> 00:31:57.559
<v Speaker 1>shave off time in the mornings running around with my

605
00:31:57.640 --> 00:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>kids' school and activities. Don't get me started with to

606
00:32:00.240 --> 00:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>travel with Jones or a miracle bomb. I have a

607
00:32:02.240 --> 00:32:04.839
<v Speaker 1>seamless go to that is lightweight and easy to pack.

608
00:32:05.240 --> 00:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And once I started simplifying my routine, I realized there

609
00:32:08.200 --> 00:32:09.799
<v Speaker 1>are some days that I need a little bit more

610
00:32:09.839 --> 00:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>coverage without looking kky or heavy. That's when I grab

611
00:32:12.519 --> 00:32:15.599
<v Speaker 1>my Jones Road Foundation stick if it's perfectly into my

612
00:32:15.680 --> 00:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>current routine and gives that extra kick of coverage modern

613
00:32:19.039 --> 00:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>day makeup that's clean, strategic, and multifunctional for effortless routines.

614
00:32:23.440 --> 00:32:25.559
<v Speaker 1>And for a limited time, our listeners are getting a

615
00:32:25.720 --> 00:32:29.079
<v Speaker 1>free full sized mass Scerra on their first purchase when

616
00:32:29.079 --> 00:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they use the code fang at checkout. Just head to

617
00:32:31.480 --> 00:32:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Jonesroadbauty dot com and use the code fang phang at checkout.

618
00:32:37.119 --> 00:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>After you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them.

619
00:32:39.759 --> 00:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Please support our show and let them know that we

620
00:32:42.039 --> 00:32:42.519
<v Speaker 1>sent you.

621
00:32:44.359 --> 00:32:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Now.

622
00:32:45.160 --> 00:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Cash Betel does assert the appropriate legal standard that is

623
00:32:48.279 --> 00:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>considered at this stage, so he sued and the defendants

624
00:32:52.200 --> 00:32:55.519
<v Speaker 1>have foul emotion to dismiss and this standard meaning the

625
00:32:55.799 --> 00:32:59.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of context or framework that the court considers the

626
00:32:59.119 --> 00:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>allegations insh Btel's complaint is in in the light most

627
00:33:03.279 --> 00:33:07.359
<v Speaker 1>favorable to the plaintiff, meaning at this stage, before any

628
00:33:07.400 --> 00:33:10.359
<v Speaker 1>discovery has been done. The court will consider the facts

629
00:33:10.400 --> 00:33:13.079
<v Speaker 1>that have been asserted and cash Betel's complaint, and they

630
00:33:13.119 --> 00:33:16.799
<v Speaker 1>will do so in the favor of cash Matel. And

631
00:33:16.799 --> 00:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that's just law, that's established law. But what the defendants

632
00:33:20.160 --> 00:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have said is we don't care because even when you

633
00:33:22.480 --> 00:33:24.839
<v Speaker 1>apply that standard, where all inferences are in favor of

634
00:33:24.839 --> 00:33:28.079
<v Speaker 1>cash Betel, we still get the ability to get this

635
00:33:28.160 --> 00:33:32.279
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit dismissed with prejudice. Now, let me be clear, the defendants,

636
00:33:32.279 --> 00:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick will get a chance to

637
00:33:34.640 --> 00:33:37.079
<v Speaker 1>file what we call a reply to what cash Pattel

638
00:33:37.240 --> 00:33:38.599
<v Speaker 1>just filed a couple of days.

639
00:33:38.440 --> 00:33:40.799
<v Speaker 2>Ago, and I expect it to be a doozy.

640
00:33:40.759 --> 00:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Of a reply because what cash Matel says Spurtz here

641
00:33:44.160 --> 00:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is court, you can't dismiss my lawsuit because there's just

642
00:33:49.480 --> 00:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>been malice shown by the defendants, because they pretty much

643
00:33:55.279 --> 00:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't buy my incredible record of doing such a great job.

644
00:33:59.559 --> 00:34:03.319
<v Speaker 1>And I've told them that what they have is lies. Well,

645
00:34:04.319 --> 00:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. You would expect people like cash Matel to

646
00:34:06.960 --> 00:34:07.839
<v Speaker 1>say that they are lies.

647
00:34:07.920 --> 00:34:09.079
<v Speaker 2>In fact, Cash.

648
00:34:08.840 --> 00:34:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Battel, under oath, at a Senate confirmation hearing the other day,

649
00:34:14.719 --> 00:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>said the following to Senator Van Holland, you.

650
00:34:17.480 --> 00:34:20.039
<v Speaker 4>Agree Director Patel that if one of your agents was

651
00:34:20.159 --> 00:34:23.559
<v Speaker 4>unable to perform his or her duties because of excessive drinking,

652
00:34:23.679 --> 00:34:26.239
<v Speaker 4>you would need to take corrective or disciplinary action. You

653
00:34:26.280 --> 00:34:27.159
<v Speaker 4>agree with that statement.

654
00:34:27.280 --> 00:34:29.960
<v Speaker 5>We would implement the inspection review process, just like these

655
00:34:29.960 --> 00:34:33.159
<v Speaker 5>other agencies have their own internal investigations, and complete that review.

656
00:34:34.360 --> 00:34:37.599
<v Speaker 4>As I said in my opening remarks, I really don't

657
00:34:37.639 --> 00:34:40.960
<v Speaker 4>care about your personal life so long as you are

658
00:34:41.519 --> 00:34:46.400
<v Speaker 4>able to perform your public and official responsibilities, which are

659
00:34:46.800 --> 00:34:52.639
<v Speaker 4>awesome responsibilities. Multiple reports, including reporting by the Atlantic, have

660
00:34:52.760 --> 00:34:57.800
<v Speaker 4>alleged episodes of excessive drinking, unexplained absences, and behavior that

661
00:34:57.840 --> 00:35:02.079
<v Speaker 4>concern current and former FBI and d officials. You have

662
00:35:02.159 --> 00:35:06.360
<v Speaker 4>publicly denied those allegations and filed a defamation lawsuits. So

663
00:35:06.440 --> 00:35:10.519
<v Speaker 4>today's you testify before Congress, is it your testimony that

664
00:35:10.559 --> 00:35:13.760
<v Speaker 4>those allegations are categorically.

665
00:35:13.000 --> 00:35:15.280
<v Speaker 5>False, unequivocally categorically false.

666
00:35:15.760 --> 00:35:18.119
<v Speaker 4>So there have been no occasions during your tenure when

667
00:35:18.239 --> 00:35:20.559
<v Speaker 4>FBI personnel were unable to promptly reach you.

668
00:35:21.079 --> 00:35:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not.

669
00:35:21.920 --> 00:35:23.960
<v Speaker 5>You can ask my entire workforce. They hear from me

670
00:35:24.000 --> 00:35:26.159
<v Speaker 5>at every single hour of the day, as do these

671
00:35:26.159 --> 00:35:28.360
<v Speaker 5>great gentlemen here, as do the men and women of

672
00:35:28.360 --> 00:35:30.480
<v Speaker 5>the interagency in state and local law enforcement in the

673
00:35:30.480 --> 00:35:30.960
<v Speaker 5>White House.

674
00:35:31.360 --> 00:35:33.559
<v Speaker 4>And so there have been no occasions when your security

675
00:35:33.599 --> 00:35:35.679
<v Speaker 4>detail had difficulty waking or locating you.

676
00:35:35.800 --> 00:35:37.079
<v Speaker 2>Is that right now?

677
00:35:37.159 --> 00:35:38.880
<v Speaker 5>If it's a total force, I don't even know where

678
00:35:38.880 --> 00:35:40.559
<v Speaker 5>you get this stuff. But it doesn't make it credible

679
00:35:40.559 --> 00:35:41.320
<v Speaker 5>because you say so.

680
00:35:42.360 --> 00:35:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean that really does spack of methink thou dolt

681
00:35:45.280 --> 00:35:46.039
<v Speaker 1>protest too much?

682
00:35:46.079 --> 00:35:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Cash? Does it not?

683
00:35:47.119 --> 00:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>But look, I mean, somebody's definitely got his you know,

684
00:35:52.079 --> 00:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>panties in a bunch about what is being asserted against him,

685
00:35:55.440 --> 00:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and he does seem incredibly defensive. But being defensive and

686
00:35:58.880 --> 00:36:02.519
<v Speaker 1>stating it's not true does not stop a publication from

687
00:36:02.519 --> 00:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And according to the lawyer who is representing

688
00:36:07.960 --> 00:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Cash Betel, a guy by the name of Jesse Banal,

689
00:36:10.639 --> 00:36:13.159
<v Speaker 1>who I'd like to share with you right now the following.

690
00:36:13.280 --> 00:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Binall is a Trump lawyer. He has done a

691
00:36:17.519 --> 00:36:21.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of work for the Trump campaign in places like Nevada,

692
00:36:21.840 --> 00:36:25.079
<v Speaker 1>pushing claims of voter fraud in not only court filings

693
00:36:25.079 --> 00:36:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but also congressional testimony. He's represented Donald Trump and civil

694
00:36:28.800 --> 00:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits that were brought by congressional lawmakers and plaintiffs sek

695
00:36:31.880 --> 00:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>can to hold him accountable for his rhetoric over the

696
00:36:34.920 --> 00:36:39.079
<v Speaker 1>January sixth insurrection. So Jesse Banall is no stranger to

697
00:36:39.159 --> 00:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>being in the Trump world and doing trumpy shit. So

698
00:36:43.079 --> 00:36:45.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised by what I've seen that has been

699
00:36:45.119 --> 00:36:50.039
<v Speaker 1>filed by Cash Betel's lawyers. But here's an interesting wrinkle

700
00:36:50.079 --> 00:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that I want to also bring to your attention. Once

701
00:36:53.840 --> 00:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits are filed, there is the chance to be able

702
00:36:56.280 --> 00:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to participate in something called discovery. We've talked about it

703
00:36:59.079 --> 00:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot here at Katie Fangs News, but it bears repeating.

704
00:37:02.159 --> 00:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Just because there's a pending motion to dismiss does not

705
00:37:04.519 --> 00:37:07.559
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself mean that discovery doesn't happen, Because

706
00:37:07.599 --> 00:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes as discovery happens, it actually helps frame some of

707
00:37:11.440 --> 00:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the issues that may be a part of a motion

708
00:37:13.920 --> 00:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss. The discovery definitely speaks to an eventual filing

709
00:37:18.920 --> 00:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>called a motion for summary judgment, which comes later after

710
00:37:23.000 --> 00:37:26.760
<v Speaker 1>discovery has been fully developed, and again supports the idea

711
00:37:26.920 --> 00:37:30.599
<v Speaker 1>that either a claim or defense cannot be maintained because

712
00:37:30.599 --> 00:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the evidence doesn't support it. In its instance, discovery was

713
00:37:35.480 --> 00:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be starting an ongoing in this lawsuit. However,

714
00:37:40.119 --> 00:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the defendants, the Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick have asked the

715
00:37:43.280 --> 00:37:46.199
<v Speaker 1>court to stay or pause discovery because they believe so

716
00:37:46.239 --> 00:37:49.599
<v Speaker 1>strongly that their motion to dismiss will be well taken granted,

717
00:37:49.760 --> 00:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a waste of time to be able

718
00:37:51.440 --> 00:37:56.039
<v Speaker 1>to do discovery. However, there's one specific area of discovery

719
00:37:56.320 --> 00:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>that the Atlantic and Sarah Fitzpatrick are asking the court

720
00:37:59.320 --> 00:38:03.199
<v Speaker 1>to have move on and continue, and that is this

721
00:38:03.800 --> 00:38:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm referencing the motion to stay discovery that requests

722
00:38:09.239 --> 00:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that are directed to the gooj FBI and Cash Patel

723
00:38:13.559 --> 00:38:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that they should be allowed to be ford because Cash

724
00:38:18.079 --> 00:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Patel and any defamation lawsuit as the plaintiff, carries the

725
00:38:22.519 --> 00:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>burden to show that the article that was published in

726
00:38:27.360 --> 00:38:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic is quote materially false, nor can the defendants

727
00:38:31.679 --> 00:38:35.519
<v Speaker 1>establish that the article is substantially true. Now think about this,

728
00:38:35.719 --> 00:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>because well, let me clean that up. Cash Patel, as

729
00:38:38.960 --> 00:38:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiff in this defamation lawsuit, must prove it's a

730
00:38:42.760 --> 00:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>burden to prove that the article that was published in

731
00:38:45.280 --> 00:38:50.599
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic was materially false. In order for the defendants

732
00:38:51.159 --> 00:38:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to establish that the article as published was substantially true,

733
00:38:55.960 --> 00:38:59.199
<v Speaker 1>they should be able to participate in discovery by getting

734
00:38:59.199 --> 00:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>information from the DOJDFBI and from cash Btel himself about

735
00:39:04.000 --> 00:39:08.519
<v Speaker 1>things like excessive drinking, his people not being able to

736
00:39:08.519 --> 00:39:10.599
<v Speaker 1>wake him up because he's been so blasted and so

737
00:39:10.679 --> 00:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>passed out drunk, his abuse of his role as the

738
00:39:14.800 --> 00:39:18.039
<v Speaker 1>FBI director to purge employees because they don't pass a

739
00:39:18.079 --> 00:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>loyalty test.

740
00:39:19.880 --> 00:39:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Things like he's unable to do his job because of

741
00:39:22.280 --> 00:39:23.760
<v Speaker 2>his excessive drinking and partying.

742
00:39:24.599 --> 00:39:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Those are the allegations, and the defendant should be able

743
00:39:27.239 --> 00:39:31.039
<v Speaker 1>to prove them by way of accessing this information internally

744
00:39:31.079 --> 00:39:34.039
<v Speaker 1>at places like the DOJDFBI and from cash Betel himself.

745
00:39:34.199 --> 00:39:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very interesting ploy here that has been

746
00:39:37.360 --> 00:39:40.760
<v Speaker 1>used by the defendants. That's like, look, our motion to

747
00:39:40.800 --> 00:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>dismiss is so strong that we believe that discovery doesn't

748
00:39:44.360 --> 00:39:46.079
<v Speaker 1>make sense. But hey, at the same time, you should

749
00:39:46.079 --> 00:39:49.639
<v Speaker 1>allow this one particular path and discovery to happen because

750
00:39:49.679 --> 00:39:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that'll also help us prove that what we've published about

751
00:39:52.639 --> 00:39:55.079
<v Speaker 1>cash Betel is true. That is the danger, as we

752
00:39:55.199 --> 00:39:58.639
<v Speaker 1>know as to any defamation lawsuit, when you see somebody

753
00:39:58.639 --> 00:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for defamation, you put at issue what you are claiming

754
00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are the lies because it allows the defendant to be

755
00:40:05.519 --> 00:40:08.599
<v Speaker 1>able to say it's true, and in order to prove

756
00:40:08.599 --> 00:40:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that something is true, you get to be able to

757
00:40:10.800 --> 00:40:12.559
<v Speaker 1>access that information from the plaintiff.

758
00:40:12.599 --> 00:40:14.559
<v Speaker 2>It is a delicious turn.

759
00:40:15.360 --> 00:40:18.199
<v Speaker 1>The irony doesn't escape me here, and that's part of

760
00:40:18.239 --> 00:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the reason I think why Cash Mattel has been unsuccessful

761
00:40:21.000 --> 00:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and at least a couple of his defamation lawsuits because

762
00:40:23.320 --> 00:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>he realized that, yeah, anybody can sue, but you have

763
00:40:26.480 --> 00:40:28.519
<v Speaker 1>to be able to sustain the lawsuit, and part of

764
00:40:28.559 --> 00:40:31.599
<v Speaker 1>that involves the discovery process. We are going to watch

765
00:40:31.639 --> 00:40:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this lawsuit carefully because it truly does strike at the

766
00:40:34.360 --> 00:40:36.519
<v Speaker 1>heart of the freedom of the press to be able

767
00:40:36.519 --> 00:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to publish articles about people that are high up in

768
00:40:38.880 --> 00:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the food chain in an administration like the Trump administration,

769
00:40:42.079 --> 00:40:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and to be able to report accurately and truthfully about

770
00:40:44.679 --> 00:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the wrongdoings that are being perpetrated and committed by the

771
00:40:47.400 --> 00:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>people that are in the upper echelons of this regime,

772
00:40:50.519 --> 00:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>people like the director.

773
00:40:51.559 --> 00:40:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Of the FBI.

774
00:40:52.840 --> 00:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And when the FBI director can't do his job properly

775
00:40:56.400 --> 00:40:59.039
<v Speaker 1>and competently, I think we as the American people, deserve

776
00:40:59.079 --> 00:41:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to know, and that's why the press should be able

777
00:41:01.719 --> 00:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to print articles even when they hurt Little Cash's feelings.

778
00:41:06.880 --> 00:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Be mad, the outrage, demand accountability.

779
00:41:08.920 --> 00:41:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm off to rattle cages. Katie Fang.

780
00:41:11.480 --> 00:41:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Here we launched the Katie Fang News Channel in partnership

781
00:41:14.320 --> 00:41:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Midas Touch Network so we could bring you

782
00:41:16.360 --> 00:41:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the latest in legal and political news, straight no chaser. So,

783
00:41:20.119 --> 00:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're a fellow truthteller, hit that subscribe button and

784
00:41:23.000 --> 00:41:25.760
<v Speaker 1>share the word about this channel so we can build

785
00:41:25.800 --> 00:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a high information America together
