Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. John Hickenlooper and
Speaker 1: Michael Bennett pushing a bill in DC that would make
Speaker 1: it illegal for ICE to detain an illegal immigrant in
Speaker 1: a polling place at the voting boosts. I mean, think
Speaker 1: about how wacko that is right, And so many people
Speaker 1: have rightly suspected that the reason hick and Looper and
Speaker 1: Bennett and the rest want to open up the borders
Speaker 1: and have everybody come in here unchecked and unvetted as
Speaker 1: they see all these people as as Democrat voters, and
Speaker 1: now Hickenlooper and Bennett want to say ICE can't detain
Speaker 1: them at a polling place. I mean, think about the
Speaker 1: message they're sending to folks here illegally. The safest place
Speaker 1: you can be in America if you're illegal is at
Speaker 1: the voting booths. Wow. So if you want to see
Speaker 1: the actual bill, I mean, read it for yourself. I
Speaker 1: posted it at Dan Kaplis on Acts on Twitter because
Speaker 1: I was sitting there this morning preparing for the show,
Speaker 1: and I was reading this bill that's called the Protecting
Speaker 1: Sensitive Locations Act, And yeah, I'm reading through it and
Speaker 1: I find the provision right there, so you can see
Speaker 1: it for yourself, and please send it to everybody. You know,
Speaker 1: this is an election cycle in Colorado. Hickenlooper is up
Speaker 1: and the people need to know. You know, he has
Speaker 1: his phony facade of being mister moderate this and that
Speaker 1: this is the opposite of moderate, a guy who wants
Speaker 1: to use the power Colorado's give him to make it
Speaker 1: illegal for ICE to detain illegal immigrants in polling places. Wow,
Speaker 1: Jimmy Sangenberger kind enough to join is Jimmy you are
Speaker 1: an answer to a prayer? My friend. I'm sure you
Speaker 1: hear that often from many people. But yesterday on the show,
Speaker 1: when I was I had the union president on from
Speaker 1: seven and was talking about my support for the King
Speaker 1: super strike. At this point I said, Hey, anybody thinks
Speaker 1: I'm wrong here, please bring it on. And Jimmy, you
Speaker 1: wrote a piece in the gazette entitled strike serves outside agenda,
Speaker 1: not local workers. So thanks for joining us, brother, and
Speaker 1: lay it on us.
Speaker 2: Dan.
Speaker 3: Thanks for having me. Yeah, I mean, look three years ago.
Speaker 3: I think there was some understandable basis for the last
Speaker 3: labor strike that the employees had with King Soupers, particularly
Speaker 3: because it was at that tail end of the pandemic.
Speaker 3: People had been put through the ringer for so long,
Speaker 3: and I could understand why there would be a lot
Speaker 3: of angst and people would want to protest and say,
Speaker 3: you know what, we want to make sure we get
Speaker 3: the best deal this time. I don't think that's what's
Speaker 3: really going on. And I did listen to your interview
Speaker 3: with Kim Cordova, the leader of Local seven. But one
Speaker 3: thing that I found very interesting the other day was
Speaker 3: when King Soupers filed a loss suit in federal court
Speaker 3: against the union, saying that they had been coordinating with
Speaker 3: outside union organizations. And I dug in a little deeper
Speaker 3: looked at some of the sources that they cited in
Speaker 3: the lawsuit, and that is very clear. There is a
Speaker 3: woman by the name of Fay Gunther who is out
Speaker 3: of Washington, who leads the UFCW, which is what Local
Speaker 3: seven is affiliated with. UFCW Local seven I think United
Speaker 3: Food and Commercial Workers and UFCW three thousand is led
Speaker 3: by a genuine radical leftist in fake Gunther, who has
Speaker 3: said all kinds of things about wanting to reshape and
Speaker 3: essence remake as I look at it, the entire UFCW
Speaker 3: organization in her own image, and she attended the very
Speaker 3: first meeting back in October the labor between Local seven
Speaker 3: and King Supers their first negotiation day, even after I
Speaker 3: think it was the day after the company had said
Speaker 3: we don't want anybody from the outside being there, and
Speaker 3: so to me what we are seeing is something much grander,
Speaker 3: that is from the left wing in a union effort
Speaker 3: to so more disruption than to provide for workers here
Speaker 3: at home.
Speaker 1: Well, but doesn't it still come down to whether the
Speaker 1: strike is justified. I mean, I understand the concern about
Speaker 1: outside influences and political ambitions and all of that, but
Speaker 1: in the end, is the strike you're justified or not?
Speaker 3: I would say if you have somebody like this exerting pressure,
Speaker 3: if they're part of a group that has been identified
Speaker 3: in multiple leftist outlets as including Local seven, that I
Speaker 3: would in fact question the intentions and the motives. I mean,
Speaker 3: when I went to I did I guess cross the
Speaker 3: picket line over the weekend on Super Bowl Sunday. Had
Speaker 3: to pick up a few things, so we went inside
Speaker 3: our store and on our way out, I grabbed one
Speaker 3: of the flyers to see, Okay, what is it that
Speaker 3: they're saying on this material, And the biggest thing that
Speaker 3: was identified, and I think Kim Krodova mentioned it yesterday,
Speaker 3: is this idea that eight million dollars will be taken
Speaker 3: from the retiree Health Fund to be able to finance
Speaker 3: pay increases, which, by the way, I find interesting for
Speaker 3: the union and their criticism to impart knowledge pay increases
Speaker 3: to employees. But King super slatly denies that that's the case. Now,
Speaker 3: of course, maybe it's true, but I found it curious
Speaker 3: that that was the biggest thing that they explained. Is
Speaker 3: there as their number one discussion point on that flyer
Speaker 3: for why they were engaging in this strike. I question
Speaker 3: some of the and I heard the other reasons that
Speaker 3: have to do with staffing and wanting more people more
Speaker 3: price decreases so that you can cut prices of products.
Speaker 3: And I wonder, with the thin margins that grocery stores
Speaker 3: are operating under, how you can easily do that, especially
Speaker 3: in an inflationary environment. And list goes on, I really
Speaker 3: am not persuaded Dan that this is a justified strike,
Speaker 3: especially when you have afters like sayguns, they're heavily involved
Speaker 3: in that.
Speaker 1: Well, and listen, I understand the suspicion of the left
Speaker 1: because I think the left's ruining America. It's just to me,
Speaker 1: it doesn't mean that they're absolutely necessarily wrong on each
Speaker 1: and every point. Right, they're going to ruin America? But
Speaker 1: is it possible here that is the president claimed on
Speaker 1: the show yesterday at the president of the union that
Speaker 1: the workers here that they at this point way understaffed
Speaker 1: is the allegation, and a lot of these King superstores,
Speaker 1: meaning that workers have to do the work of multiple workers, etc.
Speaker 1: And I haven't seen any evidence that isn't true. So
Speaker 1: all I'm saying the other thing, Jimmy, is don't you
Speaker 1: think can I understand the pressure of being in a
Speaker 1: union and how they can be hard on individual employees,
Speaker 1: But if it was just a BS strike being done
Speaker 1: for ego and control for some far leftist out of state,
Speaker 1: don't you think we'd have some public resistance and push
Speaker 1: back here from King Sooper's employees who just want to work.
Speaker 3: Well, I think you do. In fact, I quote one
Speaker 3: particular individual, Rob Tibacci, who was interviewed by nine News
Speaker 3: to this effect, and he literally said, why are we
Speaker 3: at this point? Can we just please stop the games,
Speaker 3: get back to the table and get this done so
Speaker 3: we could move on. I mean, Dan, I would point
Speaker 3: often to teachers units very different because it's public sector unions.
Speaker 3: That's a different story, is to you know, I don't
Speaker 3: think public sector unions for the most part should exist.
Speaker 3: But when we look at teachers' unions, you can often
Speaker 3: see that teachers will follow the union line because they're
Speaker 3: told these things that the union's standing up or against
Speaker 3: the schools, the school district, and yet it may very
Speaker 3: much be false and often is.
Speaker 1: Well. I think that's a very fair point. I guess
Speaker 1: I've always thought of teachers unions as kind of their
Speaker 1: their own animal right, with their own political dynamics and
Speaker 1: everything else, And so yet that that's a fair point there,
Speaker 1: because certain teachers' unions right now just just undermine kids
Speaker 1: and undermine America in so many different ways, even though
Speaker 1: so many of their individual members are fantastic. You know,
Speaker 1: I think of my sister Mary, who's absolutely brilliant and
Speaker 1: a phenomenal teacher. I've spoken to her class in the
Speaker 1: past back in Chicago, and you know, in my mind,
Speaker 1: she's about as far left as you can imagine, and
Speaker 1: would be very supportive of all that teacher union stuff
Speaker 1: I imagine, but at the same time is a great
Speaker 1: teacher who loves her kids. To me, the whole teachers
Speaker 1: union thing is its own world and and something that
Speaker 1: really we've got to be able to address just to
Speaker 1: free these kids. In terms of King Soopers workers, I
Speaker 1: just see a lot of good people. You see the
Speaker 1: same thing, right, Jimmy, no matter where you are, and
Speaker 1: King Supers anywhere in Colorado, it's a good store with
Speaker 1: good stuff and nice people doing a good job. So
Speaker 1: my default is if they're upset enough to be walking
Speaker 1: off work and standing out in the cold on a
Speaker 1: picket line, I'll get my peanut butter somewhere else.
Speaker 3: So yeah, and that's fair enough. I think my illustration
Speaker 3: with regards to the teachers union example is that members
Speaker 3: of a union can fall prey to union leadership that
Speaker 3: has political motivations and will misdeed them in the wrong direction.
Speaker 3: I think that there's at least enough smoke there to
Speaker 3: suggest there's possibly a fire in this case, and I
Speaker 3: think we have to be mindful that there is now
Speaker 3: a national effort to grow this union perspective that Fay
Speaker 3: Gunther of UFCW three thousand, along with several other unions,
Speaker 3: including Local seven, that have been tied together by folks
Speaker 3: from leftist outlets like Jacobin, to really accentuate that there's
Speaker 3: something we have to be watching for. As she intends,
Speaker 3: for example, him to transform the entire grocery industry. We
Speaker 3: got to be mindful of that, and the lee have
Speaker 3: a little bit of attention that we're paying here.
Speaker 1: Fair enough, and hopefully the workers will as well. I
Speaker 1: think you know the King Soopers workers I've seen I'd
Speaker 1: chat with whatever that they seem very smart adults, and
Speaker 1: if they're being manipulated by far leftists hopefully and used
Speaker 1: as pawns, hopefully they'll see that and react. Jimmy, thanks
Speaker 1: for the time, man appreciated catch Jimmy's column in the
Speaker 1: Denver Gazette and eight five to five for zero five
Speaker 1: E two five five text d An five seven seventeen nine.
Speaker 1: When we come back, Could it really be true? Bennett
Speaker 1: and Higeloper pushing a bill that would say ICE can't
Speaker 1: detain illegals in polling places. Are they being that blatant
Speaker 1: about trying to get legal immigrants to vote for Democrats?
Speaker 1: I think you're going to see the answers. Yes, you're
Speaker 1: on the Dan Caplass Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Where are these leaks coming from?
Speaker 2: Well, look, we're thinking it's coming from inside and we
Speaker 2: know the first League of Aurora is under current investigation.
Speaker 2: We think we identify that person under investigation right now,
Speaker 2: the California League.
Speaker 1: Boy. I hope they do bust whoever was responsible for
Speaker 1: the Aurora League and endangering law enforcement that way and
Speaker 1: take appropriate action. Hopefully we'll find out together on that.
Speaker 1: But Holman says they will not be deterred. Well Sankstuarius Cities.
Speaker 2: Now they're putting up paper roadblock possible and all rather
Speaker 2: than the rest of the bad guy in account at jail.
Speaker 2: Takes one agent arrested bad guy when they gets arrested.
Speaker 2: In putting account in jail, we got to sign a
Speaker 2: whole team to the neighborhood. So it's going to be
Speaker 2: it's very difficult. Thanks US Cities, but we're gonna keep coming.
Speaker 2: What do we do about thanks raus cities. I don't
Speaker 2: want to double a man part of those thanksuous cities,
Speaker 2: sanctuary cities. If we can't get him to their homes,
Speaker 2: they'll get in the place of employment. We will have
Speaker 2: large scale of work site enforcement operation. So we're gonna
Speaker 2: send more resource. We're not gonna stop. We're gonna keep coming.
Speaker 2: We're gonna keep coming more. We're going to increase the
Speaker 2: targeting in those cities. We're gonna give full steam ahead
Speaker 2: on sanctuary cities, sanctuarys cities that we come in the
Speaker 2: priority Why because of protection they're protecting public safety thrusts
Speaker 2: and national security threats. So we're gonna doublemanpower, We're gonna
Speaker 2: double operations, We're gonna double targeting. We're coming full more
Speaker 2: and they're not gonna stop us. I'm taking this seriously.
Speaker 2: I don't sleep well at night because I'm afraid of
Speaker 2: the people are walking the streets here every day because
Speaker 2: sanctuary cities to protect them. Sanctuary cities are sanctuary for
Speaker 2: criminals bottom line.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna we're.
Speaker 2: Gonna do everything we can to find them, regardless of
Speaker 2: what it takes. We got a strong president of the
Speaker 2: White Houses, give us all the authority we need.
Speaker 5: We're coming, we see.
Speaker 1: Homeman makes such a vital point that goes to this
Speaker 1: new revelation today, which just think about it. You've got
Speaker 1: all these people, right, Bennett, Hick and Looper, polists, et cetera.
Speaker 1: Paulus's name is on it, who have made this conscious,
Speaker 1: deliberate decision to provide sanctuary to people who have already
Speaker 1: been convicted of committing other crimes. Here, try to wrap
Speaker 1: your mind around that for a second. What sane, decent
Speaker 1: person who cares about their fellow men and woman would
Speaker 1: want to give sanctuary to someone in the country illegally
Speaker 1: to begin with, who's now committed other crimes here? Who
Speaker 1: would want to do that? And why? Think about it? Well,
Speaker 1: it's certainly consistent with what we're seeing here. And I
Speaker 1: think the only place that you'll you'll find this is
Speaker 1: at Dan Kaplis on Twitter. I was going through this
Speaker 1: bill that John Hickelooper and Michael Bennett are pushing. I
Speaker 1: was going through it this morning doing show prep. On
Speaker 1: the second to last page of the bill, I found
Speaker 1: that what they're doing is they're pushing to make it
Speaker 1: illegal for ice to detain an illegal immigrant in a
Speaker 1: polling place. Well, doesn't that just make it clear that
Speaker 1: the Democrats are not only encouraging people here illegally to vote,
Speaker 1: they're working to protect them from any kind of legal
Speaker 1: enforcement while the illegals at the polling place. I mean that.
Speaker 1: That's how radical and insane this has become.
Speaker 4: Wow.
Speaker 1: So if you want to see that for yourself and
Speaker 1: please pass it around to your friends, neighbors, etc. We're
Speaker 1: in an election cycle in Colorado, John hick and Looper's
Speaker 1: up and Bennett will be in the next cycle. You know,
Speaker 1: they need to see the reality of hicken Looper and Bennett.
Speaker 1: They actually and look at the bill I posted it.
Speaker 1: They want to make it illegal for ICE to arrest
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants in polling places. So, in other words, Democrats
Speaker 1: want to send the message to illegals the safest place
Speaker 1: you can be in this country from any type of
Speaker 1: legal enforcement is at the voting booths. Think about how
Speaker 1: backwards and how dangerous that is. So take a look
Speaker 1: at it. At Dan Capli Center. We have so much
Speaker 1: hot sound we could play it for days here and
Speaker 1: it's fun sound too. And this just goes to a
Speaker 1: kind of the national nervous breakdown that the left is
Speaker 1: having the Democrats are having in front of everybody, which
Speaker 1: is a beautiful thing to behold because it makes it
Speaker 1: far less likely Democrats will win in the future. Maxine Waters,
Speaker 1: the gift that keeps on giving.
Speaker 6: Elon must where are you bring your.
Speaker 7: Ass over here?
Speaker 1: I can't get enough of that? Right, I cannot get
Speaker 1: enough of that? So yeah, please more of that. Let
Speaker 1: the American people see what the Democratic Party has really become.
Speaker 1: Because Ryan, I know it's hard for folks like people
Speaker 1: are kind to listen to a show like this and
Speaker 1: they're engaged, they care, they're involved, no matter which side
Speaker 1: they're on, and then they're probably conservative, but they're into
Speaker 1: all of this. As a former Democrat, as somebody who's
Speaker 1: raised Democrat, I can tell you there are so many
Speaker 1: people voting Democratic today, voting for the Democrat Party who
Speaker 1: aren't dialed into all this stuff. They have no idea
Speaker 1: how crazy the modern Democratic Party has become, how secular,
Speaker 1: how anti faith, how anti Christian, how anti Catholic, and
Speaker 1: just whack it has become. And now Trump is exposing that,
Speaker 1: and it's so important we keep the pedals of the
Speaker 1: metal on that because we got a lot more elections
Speaker 1: coming up, including here in Colorado, which is about the
Speaker 1: toughest nut to crack. Some more evidence that at this
Speaker 1: point Trump has just broken CNN. This is Denna Bash now.
Speaker 8: The disruptor in chief. Elon Musk, who apparently has adopted
Speaker 8: the alias at least he changed his social media handle
Speaker 8: to Harry Balls, tweeted this morning, democracy in America is
Speaker 8: being destroyed by judicial coup. An activist judge.
Speaker 1: Is not a real judge. So Ran, why do you
Speaker 1: think CNN felt compelled to talk about his Twitter handle
Speaker 1: of the day.
Speaker 9: He broke them, and he's trolling them into oblivion and
Speaker 9: they can't help but be clown themselves, and he's loving
Speaker 9: every minute of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, Holy Count of Texter Dan. What Colorado cities?
Speaker 1: There are sanctuaries? I can't find a list. Well, you
Speaker 1: know what's funny now is is Yeah, nobody on the
Speaker 1: left wants to use that name, right, they just want
Speaker 1: to do it. So, first of all, we are a
Speaker 1: sanctuary state courtesy of Jared Polis. There can be no denying.
Speaker 1: He's the founding father of the sanctuary state. His signature
Speaker 1: is on those bills, including one thing about this as
Speaker 1: mind blowing as this is a bill that says, you
Speaker 1: got somebody here illegally and they've committed other crimes. Not
Speaker 1: only that they got caught, not only that they found
Speaker 1: their way into the system, not only yet they got convicted,
Speaker 1: not only that they were in jail, and Polis says
Speaker 1: even then probation parole, you can't be cooperating with ice.
Speaker 1: I mean in the way that always used to happen.
Speaker 1: That's the definition of a sanctuary state. A lot of
Speaker 1: hot fun. Sound ahead at Dan Caplis on Twitter for
Speaker 1: that bill. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 7: First of all, we're here at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Speaker 7: What is it this is so important prior to this bit?
Speaker 1: Yeah, sorry, you hit the wrong one. We're supposed to
Speaker 1: have Max and Waters saying Elon Musk bring your blank
Speaker 1: over here. Yeah, yeah, they are cracking. We'll tee that up.
Speaker 1: Just because I could listen to that a thousand times
Speaker 1: and never get tired of it. Hey, go to at
Speaker 1: Dan Caplis on x you can see the actual bill
Speaker 1: where John Hickenlooper and Michael Bennett are trying to make
Speaker 1: it illegal for ICE to detain an illegal immigrant in
Speaker 1: a polling place. Could it be any more blatant encouraging
Speaker 1: illegals to vote? But you can see the bill, you
Speaker 1: can send it to their front, your friends. It's it's
Speaker 1: right there in black and white. Let's go to Beautiful,
Speaker 1: Lovely in Colorado talk with Tricia. You're on the Dan
Speaker 1: Kaplas show.
Speaker 6: Welcome, Hey, Dan, I'm wondering who thinks it's a great
Speaker 6: idea to direct TDA and MS thirteen and that kind
Speaker 6: of guy into your schools. Oh, yes, you consistently pretend
Speaker 6: that laws don't either change your warp incentives. And so
Speaker 6: this law is going to quickly get out. Oh, they've
Speaker 6: passed a law that favors these places. So these cartels
Speaker 6: and other organizations, they're just going to tell all their
Speaker 6: operatives find the safe ZILM and get into it. And
Speaker 6: probably it's you know, it's gonna end up being your
Speaker 6: kid's math class or his Bible class.
Speaker 1: You know that is such a brilliant point. I mean
Speaker 1: that the Left, including Bennett and Hickelooper, they are so
Speaker 1: devoted to not only folks here I legally, but folks
Speaker 1: here illegally have committed crimes. They not only prohibit probation
Speaker 1: and parole from interacting with Dice the way they should.
Speaker 1: At this point, they're saying, Yeah, if you can flee
Speaker 1: to if you can flee to a school, if you
Speaker 1: can flee to to a church, you'll be protected there. Now,
Speaker 1: what HICKL Luke print Bennett would say to that is, oh, no, no,
Speaker 1: Wait a second. There's an exception in this bill for
Speaker 1: exigent exig E n T circumstances. So in a true emergency, no,
Speaker 1: they could go in and get them. Well, wait a second,
Speaker 1: that's true the way they've drafted this bill, that's true
Speaker 1: for the most extreme emergency. But as you read the
Speaker 1: language of this bill. As you read the language of
Speaker 1: this bill, it is clearly intended to make it very,
Speaker 1: very difficult for ICE to follow somebody into a school
Speaker 1: who they know has committed other crimes, committed other serious crimes,
Speaker 1: and who they need to arrest under this bill. Let
Speaker 1: me read the language to you. The term exigen circumstances
Speaker 1: means a situation involving the imminent risk of death, violence,
Speaker 1: or physical harm to any person, including a situation implicating
Speaker 1: terrorism or the national security of the United States in
Speaker 1: some manner Subsection two the immediate rest or hot pursuit
Speaker 1: of any individual presenting an imminent danger to public safety,
Speaker 1: including the imminent risk of death, violence, or physical harm
Speaker 1: to a person. So what they've done, first of all,
Speaker 1: it should be a no brainer if you're pursuing somebody
Speaker 1: you know is a criminal, they're here illegally and they've
Speaker 1: committed some other crime, you should just be able to
Speaker 1: go get them. But what they've done through this language
Speaker 1: now is create this risk to each ICE officer and
Speaker 1: to the agency that if if somewhere down the road,
Speaker 1: some prosecutor, some courts somewhever determines that they didn't meet
Speaker 1: all of this criteria, they could be looking at all
Speaker 1: sorts of serious legal consequences. So now your point is
Speaker 1: brilliant that they once again are putting people here illegally,
Speaker 1: you have committed other crimes over even children in schools
Speaker 1: and people in churches, which have been targets of vile
Speaker 1: list in the past.
Speaker 6: Well, and what they'll tell you is that they want
Speaker 6: they'll call the undocumented people to be able to feel
Speaker 6: free to go to church and go to the courthouse
Speaker 6: and go wherever, you know. But what they're not they
Speaker 6: don't understand is that they have they have specifically directed
Speaker 6: the criminal cartels to send their operatives to these places.
Speaker 3: As no GOO zones.
Speaker 6: So they've been dangered the citizens who will use those
Speaker 6: so called safety places.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well they have, Trician, thank you for your call.
Speaker 1: But the important thing that the other important thing to
Speaker 1: keep in mind here is that Benett and Hickenlooper they
Speaker 1: aren't carving out any any exception here, general exception for
Speaker 1: people here illegally you have committed other crimes, right, And
Speaker 1: so they want to make it out as, oh, no,
Speaker 1: if somebody come here illegally, they're living peacefully, they're going
Speaker 1: to church, they shouldn't have to fear being detained by
Speaker 1: ISID church. But what Bennett Nickeelober know they're really doing
Speaker 1: is protecting people who have come here illegally and committed
Speaker 1: other crimes. And you know, same thing Polis did when
Speaker 1: he signed that awful bill that says probation and parole
Speaker 1: can't cooperate with ICE the way they used to. So
Speaker 1: ask yourself again, why would Bennett Nickeelobber get to the
Speaker 1: point they're trying to protect people here illegally from being
Speaker 1: detained by ICE when they're at the polling place. Right,
Speaker 1: so we know people here illegally cannot vote legally. Why
Speaker 1: does John Hickenlooper want to prohibit ICE from detaining somebody
Speaker 1: here illegally when they are in a polling place. That's
Speaker 1: not church, that's not school, that's a polling place. Why
Speaker 1: do you think he wants to do that? Kevin and Boulder,
Speaker 1: you're on the Dan Kaplis show. Welcome.
Speaker 5: You had overdos talking about animal testing. Yes, I tell
Speaker 5: you I called last week and they gave you a
Speaker 5: little info in it. But they torture tens of millions
Speaker 5: of animals every year in the US alone, cow's pigs, snakes, rabbits, dogs, cats,
Speaker 5: hundreds of species. And that's why I never donate money
Speaker 5: to these medical charities, like at the grocery store, if
Speaker 5: they ask you you want to donate, no, because a
Speaker 5: lot of that money goes to torture animals.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 5: One reason they use beagles is because they're so docile
Speaker 5: and trusting. And when they torture animals by testing things
Speaker 5: like cosmetics that they put in their eyes before they
Speaker 5: test them, they'll cut off their eyelids so they can't
Speaker 5: blink from the pain of the stuff burning out their eyes.
Speaker 1: This is disgusting.
Speaker 5: It needs to be stopped. And there's groups. I was
Speaker 5: protesting publicly in Phoenix twenty and thirty years ago against this,
Speaker 5: and I had TV shows that made this public. It's
Speaker 5: just horrendous. They break Orangutang's next to test motorcycle helmets.
Speaker 5: It's disgusting and satanic, and people need to voice, they
Speaker 5: need to complain to their legislators and their politicians about
Speaker 5: this because it's absolutely heartbreaking and satanic the way I mean,
Speaker 5: it's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Kevin, where do you recommend people go to learn more
Speaker 1: about this? We had Congressman Boberda on earlier. She brought
Speaker 1: it up in along with Nancy Mays in a House committee.
Speaker 1: What do you suggest, Well, go online.
Speaker 5: There's a lot of group there's hundreds of groups fighting
Speaker 5: animal testing. And I actually met the guy who created
Speaker 5: the Last Chance for Animals, Chris Drose, in LA and
Speaker 5: he was a well known character actor on TV shows
Speaker 5: and movies and he quit that to rescue animals from testing.
Speaker 5: And he's in jail in prison for doing that. But
Speaker 5: he's one of the best known people with his group,
Speaker 5: and you get a lot of information from groups like his,
Speaker 5: And he actually recommended me to write the screenplay for
Speaker 5: a movie based on his life.
Speaker 1: Had who he engaged in violence? Why is he in jail?
Speaker 5: No, no, no, I can't tell you the extent because
Speaker 5: I haven't read it, but public protesting and his group
Speaker 5: was the first group to get somebody put in prison,
Speaker 5: to get several people put in prison for stealing cats
Speaker 5: and dogs out of people's yards and selling them to
Speaker 5: research labs, which they're called Class B dealers, and the
Speaker 5: labs are not required to get any credentials or asked
Speaker 5: where the animals came from, and they'll go around stealing them.
Speaker 1: Anybody who would steal somebody's pet like that should be
Speaker 1: in jail for a long time. Kevin, appreciate the call,
Speaker 1: my friend Texter at d An five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: Isn't it funny all those liberals who are so proud
Speaker 1: of us being a sanctuary state are now claiming we
Speaker 1: aren't a sanctuary state. Liberal hypocrisy at as fine as
Speaker 1: Mike and Henderson. You are literally too kind, Mike. It's
Speaker 1: liberal dishonesty, not hypocrisy. Dan you should send that bill
Speaker 1: to Trump. Hick should be ridiculed publicly for that. Hack
Speaker 1: Hicks should be defeated for that. That's all it should
Speaker 1: take to defeat him in Colorado. Is is you know?
Speaker 1: All right? So, Senator Hickenlooper, you want to make it
Speaker 1: law to protect any legal immigrant voting in our elections
Speaker 1: international elections? Right? Oh no, I don't want to Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: this is your bill. Ice cannot detain any illegal at
Speaker 1: a polling place? What why would you want to protect
Speaker 1: any illegal while they're at a polling place? Yeah? Yeah,
Speaker 1: Hick Kicks should be more than ridiculed for that. He
Speaker 1: should be He should be run out of office. Save
Speaker 1: five for zero five A two five five text d
Speaker 1: A N five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 4: And now back to the dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 9: I like that Ryan who is at five point fifty
Speaker 9: one till Tuesday, Amy Mann, And it is Tuesday, so
Speaker 9: we waited until tuesday to.
Speaker 1: Play till Tuesday. Beautifulee done, Thank you, beautifully done. Please
Speaker 1: do check out at dan Kaplis on X send it
Speaker 1: to all of your friends. This is an actual bill
Speaker 1: John Hickenlooper and Bennett are pushing that would prohibit ICE
Speaker 1: from detaining illegal immigrants at polling places, right, I mean
Speaker 1: talk about encouraging folks here illegally to vote. Yeah, safest
Speaker 1: place you can be in America. If here here illegally
Speaker 1: isn't a polling place because John Hickenlooper wants to make
Speaker 1: it illegal for ICE to be able to touch you.
Speaker 1: There just part of the not so proud tradition of
Speaker 1: Colorado Democrats. And listen, it's one thing, and we've talked
Speaker 1: about this for years and there it's one thing for
Speaker 1: somebody to say, Hey, you know, if if I'd been
Speaker 1: born on the other side of the border in tough circumstances,
Speaker 1: I would have come to this country peacefully, even if
Speaker 1: it had to be legally, and done my best to
Speaker 1: contribute and build a life, et cetera. I get that,
Speaker 1: I respect it. I've said it myself, and it's true.
Speaker 1: If I'd been born on the other side of the
Speaker 1: border in dire circumstances and I couldn't get here legally,
Speaker 1: I probably would have and I would have done it peacefully,
Speaker 1: and I would have done my very best to contribute
Speaker 1: to this country. I would not have committed other crimes.
Speaker 1: But and that doesn't mean we should have open borders.
Speaker 1: Of course we can't, right, it's just a practical thing.
Speaker 1: But we respect the human dignity and the basic goodness
Speaker 1: of so many people who have come here illegally. Doesn't
Speaker 1: mean they should have doesn't mean the border should be open.
Speaker 1: But then I've gotten this next bat nine or somebody's
Speaker 1: going to take that out of context. The next part
Speaker 1: of this is, but there are a lot of people
Speaker 1: who come in illegally. You aren't good people, and they're
Speaker 1: violent criminals. And the people who come in here and
Speaker 1: commit other crimes is who John hicking Looper and Michael
Speaker 1: Bennett and Jared Polis are trying so hard to protect.
Speaker 1: That's obscene, it's in humane, it's immoral, and it shows
Speaker 1: a dramatic disregard for human life and safety.
Speaker 9: Yes, my friend, if you or I wanted to go
Speaker 9: to any other country in the world, pick one. And
Speaker 9: we're born America and we're not natives of that country,
Speaker 9: citizens of that country. We decide, you know what, I'm
Speaker 9: going to roll the dice and I'm going to go
Speaker 9: in illegally, and then we get caught and then we're like, yeah,
Speaker 9: you got me, and they're going to deport me, And
Speaker 9: well that's how it goes. My point is, you come
Speaker 9: here illegally, you're making a bet and it's a bad bet,
Speaker 9: and it should be a bad bet. And if you're
Speaker 9: here illegally and you get caught, don't be surprised if
Speaker 9: you get kicked out, and don't feel bad either. You tried,
Speaker 9: you lost, you got caught. Game over, go back, try
Speaker 9: again and.
Speaker 4: Do it legally.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and good. But I mean, there's no other country
Speaker 1: in the world where a certain big group of politicians
Speaker 1: have an incentive to attract you as an illegal immigrant.
Speaker 4: Right here.
Speaker 1: The Democratic Party in America has that incentive. The Bennetts,
Speaker 1: the Hicckyloopers, the Polists. They want more and more people
Speaker 1: coming here illegally, including the bad ones along with the
Speaker 1: good ones. They want them all because they view them
Speaker 1: all as votes. And you know, you have the one argument,
Speaker 1: they view them as future votes. But when you see
Speaker 1: Bennett and Hickeylooper out there pushing a bill along with
Speaker 1: their fellow Democrats senators that say right now, you can't
Speaker 1: detain any illegal immigrant at a polling place, what conclusion
Speaker 1: can you draw other than they want illegal immigrants voting Now,
Speaker 1: why would you be protecting them in a polling place
Speaker 1: unless you wanted them voting.
Speaker 9: Now, there isn't any other explanation, and it goes to
Speaker 9: your point that you were making earlier, which I think
Speaker 9: is a good one, and I've also trumpeted this one
Speaker 9: on my own show.
Speaker 4: You're setting up shop Mike Johnston.
Speaker 9: And others, Well, we're not going to come to schools
Speaker 9: or hospitals or churches. Well, you're just giving the green
Speaker 9: light then, and other Texters have made this point. Okay,
Speaker 9: if I'm in trendy Arragua, those are the three places
Speaker 9: to go.
Speaker 1: And when you read this full bill where I found
Speaker 1: that they're trying to protect illegals in polling places, when
Speaker 1: you read the full bill, they describe so many places
Speaker 1: as safe places. As a practical matter, it'd be impossible
Speaker 1: for ICE to operate because so many different places in
Speaker 1: society under this Hickenlooper Bennett bill would be places ICE
Speaker 1: couldn't operate. And get that within three football fields of there,
Speaker 1: So all of a sudden, you're trying to operate in
Speaker 1: any kind of urban environment, and okay, you can't go
Speaker 1: within three football fields of a polling place. Tap around
Speaker 1: somebody here illegally has committed other crimes. That's what John
Speaker 1: Hickenlooper wants, right, And then you label in okay, and
Speaker 1: it can't be within three football fields of an urgent
Speaker 1: care clinic. How many urgent care clinics do we have?
Speaker 1: Can't be within three football fields of a hospital. I mean,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, there's not much left. And I
Speaker 1: love Tom Holman's point, you know, and he didn't name
Speaker 1: Polus by name. But if it wasn't for Polis and
Speaker 1: hickin Luburn, Bennett and people who are doing the things
Speaker 1: they're doing, I wouldn't have to be out there right
Speaker 1: now as much in the communities doing this dangerous work
Speaker 1: of pulling dangerous people who've committed crimes out of apartments, etc.
Speaker 1: They just get them at the jails. Not all of them,
Speaker 1: but they'd get a bunch of them. But no, Jared
Speaker 1: Polis won't let you do that, right, Jared Polis says
Speaker 1: parole and probation can't cooperate the way they used to. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but you come back, Rynd, you come back to this question.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think we were talking to Congressoman Bobert
Speaker 1: about it earlier, and maybe to George Brockler, what type
Speaker 1: of human would want to protect somebody here illegally who
Speaker 1: had committed other crimes over innocent civilians. What type of
Speaker 1: human would want to protect anybody who had committed other
Speaker 1: crimes over innocent people? What type of person would want
Speaker 1: to do that? And clearly, I think it's a person
Speaker 1: who is so obsessed with their own power that they're
Speaker 1: willing to sacrifice innocent people. And that's what all these
Speaker 1: Democrats are doing right with the open border, saying they
Speaker 1: knew that along with the good people had come a
Speaker 1: lot of bad people. There'd be a lot of rapes,
Speaker 1: there'd be a lot of murders, there'd be a lot
Speaker 1: of other death and horror, and they were willing to
Speaker 1: accept that right just an acceptable casualty rates so Democrats
Speaker 1: could get more voters and keep power. And if anybody
Speaker 1: doubts that theory, look at this bill. You can find
Speaker 1: it at dan Kaplis on X where Hick and Loop
Speaker 1: and Bennett are trying to say ICE can't detain any
Speaker 1: illegal immigrant, even one who's committed other crimes when they're
Speaker 1: in the polling booth, because it's so sacred to Democrats
Speaker 1: that illegals be able to vote right, how else do
Speaker 1: you interpret that? P K, thanks for being here today
Speaker 1: and for Kelly Ryan. Thank you join us tomorrow please
Speaker 1: on the Dan Kapla Show