WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.799 --> 00:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Well whiskey, come and fame, my pain, the money, my way.

2
00:00:08.080 --> 00:00:12.439
<v Speaker 2>Why think alone when you can drink it all in

3
00:00:12.519 --> 00:00:17.440
<v Speaker 2>with Ricochet's Three Whiskey Happy Hour. Join your bartenders, Steve Hayward,

4
00:00:17.640 --> 00:00:25.719
<v Speaker 2>John You, and the International Woman of Mystery, Lucretia where

5
00:00:25.800 --> 00:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the lapped it up?

6
00:00:26.640 --> 00:00:30.359
<v Speaker 3>And David, ain't you easy on the show? Tap out?

7
00:00:30.600 --> 00:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Agive me and let that wyloone.

8
00:00:33.759 --> 00:00:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Welcome everybody to a globe spanning, worldwide edition of the

9
00:00:38.759 --> 00:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Three Whiskey Happy Hour. Because we're not just located this

10
00:00:43.600 --> 00:00:50.679
<v Speaker 1>weekend in California or wherever Lucretia hangs out. But today

11
00:00:50.719 --> 00:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to inaugurate Steve Hayward's new title,

12
00:00:54.799 --> 00:01:01.039
<v Speaker 1>the International Man of no Mystery. Because Steve, Steve.

13
00:01:01.200 --> 00:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Where are you? Where are you? You are?

14
00:01:03.359 --> 00:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You might be? This might be the farthest distance any

15
00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>member of the Three Whiskey Happy Hour has journeyed from civilization.

16
00:01:11.799 --> 00:01:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, that might be right. I'm going to say

17
00:01:13.239 --> 00:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>not the farthest away. I mean, we did do several

18
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:18.879
<v Speaker 2>episodes from Budapest the last couple of years. I am boy,

19
00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm a pretty remote spot though. I am in what

20
00:01:20.959 --> 00:01:24.319
<v Speaker 2>passes for the highlands of Iceland. I'm in this tiny

21
00:01:24.319 --> 00:01:27.159
<v Speaker 2>little hamlet that looks like the set of the Icelandic

22
00:01:27.239 --> 00:01:30.000
<v Speaker 2>version of High Planes Drifter that turns out to be

23
00:01:30.040 --> 00:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the highest settled, little tiny town in all of Iceland.

24
00:01:34.159 --> 00:01:37.599
<v Speaker 2>It's really it looks ultimately like Mars from the Mars

25
00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:40.879
<v Speaker 2>Rover or Nevada, except covered with moss and anyway, it's

26
00:01:41.120 --> 00:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty interesting.

27
00:01:42.480 --> 00:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And Steve like, isn't this like the second or third

28
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:48.439
<v Speaker 1>time you have gone back to visit your Viking slash

29
00:01:48.560 --> 00:01:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Norwegian Scandinavian four bears? Why do you keep going back

30
00:01:52.879 --> 00:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to these Baronic paces?

31
00:01:55.719 --> 00:02:01.280
<v Speaker 4>He has no Viking four bears. My maiden name John

32
00:02:01.359 --> 00:02:04.000
<v Speaker 4>is Norman, as in the Norman Conquest.

33
00:02:04.439 --> 00:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>No, I had no idea, Yes, although somebody needs no. Actually,

34
00:02:09.120 --> 00:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's actually a great title, Lucretia the Norman. It's like, right,

35
00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, well Barth the Death Dealer or something.

36
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean, by the way, we need to

37
00:02:22.840 --> 00:02:25.280
<v Speaker 2>tell uh speaking of the Norman conquest, but we need

38
00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to tell King Charles that England rests on the ancestral

39
00:02:28.879 --> 00:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>lands of the pre Normans. Whoever they were, right, was

40
00:02:31.599 --> 00:02:33.319
<v Speaker 2>the Norman conquest England?

41
00:02:33.439 --> 00:02:33.599
<v Speaker 4>Right?

42
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:34.479
<v Speaker 2>You saw that?

43
00:02:34.599 --> 00:02:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Right?

44
00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:37.879
<v Speaker 2>King Charles went to Canada this week and gave a

45
00:02:37.960 --> 00:02:41.159
<v Speaker 2>land acknowledgment. I mean, what if you know, someone pointed

46
00:02:41.159 --> 00:02:43.800
<v Speaker 2>out on Twitter, doesn't King Charles understand that his most

47
00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>fervent supporters in America are conservatives who like tradition and monarchy,

48
00:02:47.960 --> 00:02:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and the people will be most defended by his never mind,

49
00:02:50.599 --> 00:02:51.719
<v Speaker 2>it's it's I've never thought.

50
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So, Lucretia, you as Lucretia the Norman. I bet

51
00:02:57.879 --> 00:03:00.199
<v Speaker 1>you don't even take credit for King Charles because or

52
00:03:00.199 --> 00:03:02.319
<v Speaker 1>some carpetbagging German family.

53
00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:07.199
<v Speaker 4>Right, yeah, exactly, anything after you know about ten sixty

54
00:03:07.280 --> 00:03:08.319
<v Speaker 4>six doesn't count.

55
00:03:11.960 --> 00:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So Lucretia, how are you doing? And what do you

56
00:03:14.159 --> 00:03:19.719
<v Speaker 1>make of Steve's strange journeys up North north Way North? Well?

57
00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:21.599
<v Speaker 4>I have to tell you so that this is going

58
00:03:21.639 --> 00:03:23.719
<v Speaker 4>to be a bit obscure. Forgive me, but I got

59
00:03:23.719 --> 00:03:29.280
<v Speaker 4>an email from a friend talking about that Atlantic article

60
00:03:29.319 --> 00:03:35.240
<v Speaker 4>really quick that said the new DEI is conservatism and

61
00:03:35.280 --> 00:03:38.919
<v Speaker 4>that you know, College's JOHNS Hopkins, I believe it was

62
00:03:39.039 --> 00:03:44.919
<v Speaker 4>is looking to increase the intellectual diversity of its faculty

63
00:03:45.039 --> 00:03:49.520
<v Speaker 4>by adding a couple of token conservatives, I guess to

64
00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:50.199
<v Speaker 4>the faculty.

65
00:03:50.319 --> 00:03:52.639
<v Speaker 5>So I didn't bother to it is so stupid.

66
00:03:52.719 --> 00:03:56.199
<v Speaker 4>The whole point of DEI is that it was anything

67
00:03:56.400 --> 00:04:00.680
<v Speaker 4>but intellectual diversity. But anyway, so this sends it to

68
00:04:00.680 --> 00:04:02.599
<v Speaker 4>me and says Hopkins, Hopkins.

69
00:04:02.240 --> 00:04:02.840
<v Speaker 5>Here we come.

70
00:04:03.240 --> 00:04:07.879
<v Speaker 4>And I sent the quote that Steve had included in

71
00:04:07.919 --> 00:04:12.879
<v Speaker 4>a sub stect the other day about feminist glaciology, and

72
00:04:12.919 --> 00:04:16.959
<v Speaker 4>I said, oh, we could go back to this, because

73
00:04:17.279 --> 00:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>Steve had a wonderful little piece where he didn't he

74
00:04:22.879 --> 00:04:24.800
<v Speaker 4>didn't even have to make a joke, he didn't have

75
00:04:24.879 --> 00:04:28.920
<v Speaker 4>to be critical. He just let the stupidity of feminist

76
00:04:29.120 --> 00:04:32.680
<v Speaker 4>glaciology speak for itself. Is that true, Steve?

77
00:04:33.040 --> 00:04:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's right. I mean, the worst thing you can

78
00:04:35.199 --> 00:04:38.240
<v Speaker 2>do to these radical academics is give their work wider

79
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:41.920
<v Speaker 2>exposure because it's so absurd. I mean, it makes it

80
00:04:42.000 --> 00:04:46.600
<v Speaker 2>clear that luna. Our universities are filled with lunatics, and

81
00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:49.399
<v Speaker 2>they get published and they make the most noise. And

82
00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:51.639
<v Speaker 2>that's the problem. I maybe we'll get to Harvard John

83
00:04:51.720 --> 00:04:54.279
<v Speaker 2>but that's the problem. And I did read the whole

84
00:04:54.360 --> 00:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>article actually Cretia, but we'll postpone that to another time

85
00:04:56.839 --> 00:04:58.720
<v Speaker 2>because I know several of the people mentioned in it.

86
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:02.279
<v Speaker 2>I've actually known it about the JOHNS Hoppin Initiative, which

87
00:05:02.279 --> 00:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>goes back several years. The president Daniels Ron Daniels, I think,

88
00:05:07.079 --> 00:05:09.839
<v Speaker 2>said Daniels is the name of the president, and supposedly

89
00:05:09.879 --> 00:05:12.600
<v Speaker 2>he was dismayed. Oh left out of that story is

90
00:05:12.879 --> 00:05:15.800
<v Speaker 2>as I understand it, He's got a very large contribution,

91
00:05:16.399 --> 00:05:19.600
<v Speaker 2>like you know, seven figures from somebody who said, look,

92
00:05:19.639 --> 00:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>you need more political diversity in your faculty, and Daniels said,

93
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:26.399
<v Speaker 2>I agree, and he had meetings apparently, you know, with

94
00:05:26.480 --> 00:05:28.800
<v Speaker 2>people we know. I'm not going to mention specific names

95
00:05:28.879 --> 00:05:31.759
<v Speaker 2>right now. A couple are mentioned in the articles, but

96
00:05:31.879 --> 00:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>several that we know in respect or not. But that

97
00:05:33.839 --> 00:05:37.199
<v Speaker 2>was three four years ago and nothing has happened. So

98
00:05:37.319 --> 00:05:40.199
<v Speaker 2>I think it's all a farce so far, and you know,

99
00:05:40.800 --> 00:05:41.639
<v Speaker 2>more to be said later.

100
00:05:43.120 --> 00:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Great, So why don't we actually, why don't we dive

101
00:05:45.759 --> 00:05:47.879
<v Speaker 1>in with the Harvard News first, and then we'll talk

102
00:05:47.879 --> 00:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about what everyone's talking about today, which is tariff's and

103
00:05:51.759 --> 00:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the decision of the Quarter of International Trade to stop

104
00:05:54.720 --> 00:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the Trump tarras. But first, the war with Harvard continues.

105
00:06:01.879 --> 00:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>The latest news this week just actually right before we

106
00:06:04.959 --> 00:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>started the podcast, news came out that a federal District

107
00:06:09.639 --> 00:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>judge in Boston, Massachusetts, has barred the Trump administration from

108
00:06:16.720 --> 00:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>its effort to I guess the way you explain it

109
00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is to take away Harvard's right to give out visas

110
00:06:23.399 --> 00:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to cross the border. And I think Harvard actually specifies

111
00:06:27.720 --> 00:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that most of them have to go through Lucretia's backyard

112
00:06:30.079 --> 00:06:34.439
<v Speaker 1>on the way to Cambridge, Massachusetts. So we'll want to

113
00:06:34.480 --> 00:06:39.639
<v Speaker 1>hear from her about this. They wouldn't, but just the background.

114
00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Just give the background, because I don't I give you

115
00:06:42.439 --> 00:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Yeah, let me give the background, because I

116
00:06:45.480 --> 00:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think we uh talked about on the podcast yet.

117
00:06:48.360 --> 00:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But Lucretia probably works on this. I've worked on this

118
00:06:50.959 --> 00:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at Berkeley. But people probably don't know that universities, A

119
00:06:55.120 --> 00:06:57.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of universities have almost a proxy right from the

120
00:06:57.639 --> 00:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>federal government to give out visas to students that his

121
00:07:00.879 --> 00:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>visiting researchers. I would say not. The closest review by

122
00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Homeland Security and the Trump administration took

123
00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:14.759
<v Speaker 1>this away from Harvard, said Harvard's no longer allowed to

124
00:07:14.800 --> 00:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>give out these visas, effectively preventing Harvard from having any

125
00:07:18.839 --> 00:07:22.439
<v Speaker 1>foreign students and researchers next year. And one of the

126
00:07:22.480 --> 00:07:25.639
<v Speaker 1>things I was shocked to learn is that something like

127
00:07:25.759 --> 00:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>one quarter of the Harvard student body comes from abroad.

128
00:07:29.519 --> 00:07:32.399
<v Speaker 1>One quarter of the Harvard not undergraduates, all students, a

129
00:07:32.439 --> 00:07:36.639
<v Speaker 1>lot more a lot of graduate students. So that's one.

130
00:07:38.439 --> 00:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that happened this week is that President Trump

131
00:07:43.199 --> 00:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out that he was going to take away all

132
00:07:46.040 --> 00:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of Harvard's grants, which he said were three billion dollars

133
00:07:48.680 --> 00:07:52.319
<v Speaker 1>in amount, and then he toyed with the idea of

134
00:07:52.519 --> 00:07:57.759
<v Speaker 1>sending them to vocational schools instead the money, causing a

135
00:07:57.800 --> 00:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of discussion this week while Steve's been away. So Lucristiaan,

136
00:08:01.079 --> 00:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. What do you think about this

137
00:08:04.800 --> 00:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>continuing campaign against Harvard and these two battles, one overgiving

138
00:08:09.120 --> 00:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>student visas, one about taking away Harvard's research grants.

139
00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:14.680
<v Speaker 4>So let me start with the first one, and let

140
00:08:14.759 --> 00:08:18.560
<v Speaker 4>me say that at one point I was recruited by

141
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:20.959
<v Speaker 4>a certain agency to.

142
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:23.519
<v Speaker 5>How should I.

143
00:08:23.519 --> 00:08:30.759
<v Speaker 4>Say this, keeping it very vague, try to discover which

144
00:08:30.920 --> 00:08:35.639
<v Speaker 4>Chinese students were likely in Chinese graduate students were likely

145
00:08:35.679 --> 00:08:41.879
<v Speaker 4>to be sending intellectual property, sensitive intellectual property back to China.

146
00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Thinking that you know somebody who is sort of The

147
00:08:46.440 --> 00:08:49.399
<v Speaker 4>last person you think of that would care do or

148
00:08:49.399 --> 00:08:51.320
<v Speaker 4>anything about that or care it would be someone like me.

149
00:08:51.360 --> 00:08:54.279
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, that's been a problem for a long time,

150
00:08:54.440 --> 00:08:56.960
<v Speaker 4>and you said it yourself, John, they have not been

151
00:08:57.679 --> 00:09:04.559
<v Speaker 4>nearly as careful or they haven't used any anywhere near

152
00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the care they should about just letting students in. That's obvious,

153
00:09:08.360 --> 00:09:10.519
<v Speaker 4>and the reaction to the fact that we're saying, hey,

154
00:09:10.519 --> 00:09:12.279
<v Speaker 4>if you don't like America, if you're gonna come here

155
00:09:12.279 --> 00:09:14.840
<v Speaker 4>and try to undermine American values, we don't want you here.

156
00:09:14.919 --> 00:09:16.759
<v Speaker 5>Marco Rubio has been great about.

157
00:09:16.440 --> 00:09:20.879
<v Speaker 4>That, right, But because there's been no care taken over

158
00:09:20.919 --> 00:09:23.639
<v Speaker 4>the many years other than let's worry about the Chinese

159
00:09:23.679 --> 00:09:27.919
<v Speaker 4>stealing our secrets and solve the problem after it's already unsolvable.

160
00:09:28.960 --> 00:09:32.000
<v Speaker 4>The government's been terrible. Trump is trying to turn that around,

161
00:09:32.000 --> 00:09:34.159
<v Speaker 4>and of course you know he's starting with Harvard. I

162
00:09:34.159 --> 00:09:37.279
<v Speaker 4>do want a aside. It has nothing to do with

163
00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:41.399
<v Speaker 4>the fact that Trump couldn't get into Harvard or Bear

164
00:09:41.519 --> 00:09:43.679
<v Speaker 4>and couldn't get into Harvard. First of all, you get

165
00:09:43.679 --> 00:09:47.200
<v Speaker 4>into Harvard if you are a legacy or until you know,

166
00:09:47.320 --> 00:09:50.480
<v Speaker 4>very recently, if you are the right minority marginalized group.

167
00:09:50.519 --> 00:09:53.559
<v Speaker 4>You certainly don't get into Harvard if you're a handsome

168
00:09:53.679 --> 00:09:57.879
<v Speaker 4>Asian guy unless you're at least John's age and that. So,

169
00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:00.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, there's all this nonsense, all this no right,

170
00:10:00.679 --> 00:10:03.480
<v Speaker 4>one more little aside. Steve and I went to the

171
00:10:03.480 --> 00:10:07.840
<v Speaker 4>same graduate school, and I actually left that graduate school

172
00:10:07.919 --> 00:10:12.360
<v Speaker 4>because it went into essentially went into receivership. And one

173
00:10:12.360 --> 00:10:14.320
<v Speaker 4>of the things that they were doing, John is they

174
00:10:14.320 --> 00:10:20.240
<v Speaker 4>were paying for poor students like me with the money

175
00:10:20.279 --> 00:10:24.679
<v Speaker 4>of the tuition money from rich Saudi Arabian princes and whatnot,

176
00:10:25.320 --> 00:10:28.639
<v Speaker 4>and bringing in a lot of rich Saudi Arabians.

177
00:10:29.159 --> 00:10:30.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, that's great.

178
00:10:31.120 --> 00:10:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Did get me through graduate school there, and then they

179
00:10:34.480 --> 00:10:36.759
<v Speaker 4>weren't leaving. That became the first problem. And then it

180
00:10:36.799 --> 00:10:39.639
<v Speaker 4>turned out that they were actually paying other poor graduate

181
00:10:39.679 --> 00:10:43.960
<v Speaker 4>students like me. I didn't to write their dissertations because

182
00:10:43.960 --> 00:10:46.519
<v Speaker 4>of course they were too stupid to do any of that. Anyway,

183
00:10:46.759 --> 00:10:49.960
<v Speaker 4>the whole thing blew up. They shut the department is

184
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:53.600
<v Speaker 4>now gone. It's gone, and so this is not a

185
00:10:53.639 --> 00:10:57.559
<v Speaker 4>new thing where you know, rich foreigners pay the tuition

186
00:10:57.679 --> 00:11:00.799
<v Speaker 4>of poor people like me. I think it's great. I

187
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:03.080
<v Speaker 4>think it's absolutely wonderful. And I do want to point

188
00:11:03.080 --> 00:11:05.600
<v Speaker 4>out to you guys before we got on, we talked

189
00:11:05.600 --> 00:11:09.399
<v Speaker 4>about Alison Burrows, who was the Dutch.

190
00:11:09.279 --> 00:11:15.279
<v Speaker 2>Judge judge judge the ruling against Harvard against Trump today. Right.

191
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, she was also the judge who heard the Harvard

192
00:11:19.759 --> 00:11:23.879
<v Speaker 4>case in the Students for Fair Admissions, uh and and

193
00:11:23.919 --> 00:11:25.679
<v Speaker 4>of course decided in favor of Harvard.

194
00:11:25.679 --> 00:11:27.399
<v Speaker 5>But I mentioned these guys.

195
00:11:27.039 --> 00:11:30.240
<v Speaker 4>That she made a really first dy. It was done

196
00:11:30.279 --> 00:11:33.919
<v Speaker 4>with no jury trial, but she made a really dumb ruling,

197
00:11:34.000 --> 00:11:37.759
<v Speaker 4>which was that she wasn't going to allow to be

198
00:11:37.799 --> 00:11:41.200
<v Speaker 4>put into evidence a number of emails that had gone

199
00:11:41.240 --> 00:11:43.679
<v Speaker 4>back and forth between like the dean and the enrollment

200
00:11:43.720 --> 00:11:49.080
<v Speaker 4>counselors whatever, making fun of Asian students, and she she

201
00:11:49.240 --> 00:11:51.559
<v Speaker 4>didn't allow that to go into evidence in the trial.

202
00:11:51.600 --> 00:11:55.720
<v Speaker 4>And then she said there's no evidence of discrimination against

203
00:11:55.840 --> 00:11:58.720
<v Speaker 4>any Asian students at Harvard. And then of course it

204
00:11:58.840 --> 00:12:03.399
<v Speaker 4>came out on appeal and made her look like an idiot,

205
00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:06.399
<v Speaker 4>which she obviously is, but it didn't obviously hurt her career.

206
00:12:07.480 --> 00:12:11.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, everyone knew that a district court judge from Boston,

207
00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:14.519
<v Speaker 2>based in Boston was going to rule in favor of Harvard. Right,

208
00:12:14.519 --> 00:12:17.320
<v Speaker 2>that was just a given, just a couple quick facts

209
00:12:17.360 --> 00:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>that are interesting to me. And in a speculation, I

210
00:12:20.240 --> 00:12:23.519
<v Speaker 2>caught a note from Charles Murray who said a Harvard

211
00:12:23.519 --> 00:12:26.639
<v Speaker 2>class of sixty five I think was Charles, and he

212
00:12:26.679 --> 00:12:29.279
<v Speaker 2>looked at his entering class in nineteen sixty one or

213
00:12:29.320 --> 00:12:31.919
<v Speaker 2>sixty whatever it was. He said it was ninety eight

214
00:12:31.919 --> 00:12:36.039
<v Speaker 2>percent American in less than two percent foreign students. And

215
00:12:36.080 --> 00:12:40.039
<v Speaker 2>as recently I saw somewhere else as nineteen ninety the

216
00:12:40.080 --> 00:12:43.080
<v Speaker 2>student body at Harvard was only about ten percent foreign.

217
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:45.399
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that it's now twenty five percent for

218
00:12:46.200 --> 00:12:47.919
<v Speaker 2>foreign and I think, by the way you hint, John,

219
00:12:47.919 --> 00:12:50.440
<v Speaker 2>that this is probably skewed to the graduate program. So

220
00:12:51.240 --> 00:12:53.159
<v Speaker 2>maybe it may be in some of those programs, you know,

221
00:12:53.279 --> 00:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent foreign or more. I mentioned this once before

222
00:12:57.320 --> 00:12:59.399
<v Speaker 2>in another context, but I think we may find it here.

223
00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I think what you'll find is a lot of those

224
00:13:02.120 --> 00:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>people admitted are for you know, the bean counting purposes.

225
00:13:07.159 --> 00:13:09.960
<v Speaker 2>People of color. They may be quite able, you know,

226
00:13:10.080 --> 00:13:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Indians and you know, I mentioned once before, I think

227
00:13:13.440 --> 00:13:17.039
<v Speaker 2>that I had a research assistant from Ghana. Young lady

228
00:13:17.120 --> 00:13:20.159
<v Speaker 2>had been to Middlebury and she was really good. She

229
00:13:20.240 --> 00:13:22.279
<v Speaker 2>ended up going on to Princeton for graduate school. And

230
00:13:22.320 --> 00:13:24.519
<v Speaker 2>it turned out she was from a rich gun In family.

231
00:13:25.320 --> 00:13:28.960
<v Speaker 2>She'd gone to you know, fancy boarding schools in Switzerland, right,

232
00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:31.200
<v Speaker 2>so she's probably very able to do high level college

233
00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:34.679
<v Speaker 2>work in America. And guess what that's that those universities

234
00:13:34.679 --> 00:13:37.559
<v Speaker 2>gets to count them as black for their quota purposes.

235
00:13:38.279 --> 00:13:42.879
<v Speaker 2>And some undergraduate colleges like Middlebury and Williams and elsewhere,

236
00:13:42.919 --> 00:13:45.879
<v Speaker 2>this has become a complaint for the Black Lives Matters crowd.

237
00:13:46.399 --> 00:13:48.600
<v Speaker 2>And of course the politicians do don't want to come

238
00:13:48.679 --> 00:13:52.480
<v Speaker 2>anywhere near this controversy. But if you actually disaggregated the

239
00:13:52.519 --> 00:13:55.080
<v Speaker 2>foreign students and compared them to the American student in

240
00:13:55.159 --> 00:13:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Midies and so forth, I'll bet it would be yet

241
00:13:57.240 --> 00:13:59.320
<v Speaker 2>one more embarrassment for our elite colleges.

242
00:14:01.399 --> 00:14:03.519
<v Speaker 1>Christian, let me fill up on the second point. What

243
00:14:03.559 --> 00:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think about President Trump cutting off all grants

244
00:14:08.120 --> 00:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard? Can he do that? Is this actually a

245
00:14:10.600 --> 00:14:15.039
<v Speaker 1>good idea? So Harvard's response and they hired two very

246
00:14:15.080 --> 00:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>well known Republican lawyers to represent them, including one Robert Hurr.

247
00:14:19.279 --> 00:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Actually very clever, oh very clever.

248
00:14:23.320 --> 00:14:27.559
<v Speaker 1>Very clever of Harvard to do that. You know, they

249
00:14:27.559 --> 00:14:30.879
<v Speaker 1>say in the president of Harvard sent out blast emails saying,

250
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this is going to ruin our ability to do medical research.

251
00:14:34.159 --> 00:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Look at all the amazing discoveries by Harvard that have

252
00:14:37.200 --> 00:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>lengthened human life spans and done such good for the world. Chretia,

253
00:14:41.679 --> 00:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about So.

254
00:14:43.799 --> 00:14:47.080
<v Speaker 4>That's a really interesting question, John, and kind of a

255
00:14:47.120 --> 00:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>bigger question. I was hoping we might get to discuss

256
00:14:49.399 --> 00:14:52.159
<v Speaker 4>this week because I've seen it over and over Trump

257
00:14:52.200 --> 00:14:56.080
<v Speaker 4>cutting off funds to NPR. We talked about it briefly

258
00:14:56.120 --> 00:15:02.320
<v Speaker 4>when we talked about Trump deciding not to Trump's war

259
00:15:02.480 --> 00:15:08.159
<v Speaker 4>on the law firms that had participated in prosecuting him

260
00:15:08.320 --> 00:15:13.679
<v Speaker 4>before he became president. Again, I believe that you, if

261
00:15:13.919 --> 00:15:16.720
<v Speaker 4>you're the president making those kinds of decisions, that you

262
00:15:16.840 --> 00:15:20.399
<v Speaker 4>have to do so in a way that's fair. You

263
00:15:20.440 --> 00:15:23.799
<v Speaker 4>couldn't just discriminate against Harvard for no reason and say

264
00:15:23.919 --> 00:15:25.960
<v Speaker 4>my kid didn't get in, so you're not getting any money,

265
00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:31.799
<v Speaker 4>but to say that you have that Harvard discriminates against Jews,

266
00:15:31.879 --> 00:15:35.960
<v Speaker 4>et cetera, and has not taken steps as they've been

267
00:15:36.000 --> 00:15:40.840
<v Speaker 4>asked to do to curb anti Semitism at Harvard. And

268
00:15:40.960 --> 00:15:44.200
<v Speaker 4>if you don't do that, we will stop, we will

269
00:15:44.200 --> 00:15:48.080
<v Speaker 4>stop federal money going to you in research grants. That's

270
00:15:48.159 --> 00:15:50.679
<v Speaker 4>been done before. It just went the other way, right,

271
00:15:50.759 --> 00:15:55.679
<v Speaker 4>it went the other way. Nobody questioned that the court could,

272
00:15:55.720 --> 00:15:58.879
<v Speaker 4>for instance, excuse me, that the president could, for instance,

273
00:15:58.879 --> 00:16:04.639
<v Speaker 4>an administration could say to I'll say Bob Jones University,

274
00:16:04.639 --> 00:16:07.440
<v Speaker 4>but make up what they didn't do, which was if

275
00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:10.440
<v Speaker 4>they discriminate against blacks and say we don't want any

276
00:16:10.480 --> 00:16:14.120
<v Speaker 4>blacks in our university. Nobody would have even blinked an

277
00:16:14.159 --> 00:16:18.200
<v Speaker 4>I if the administration at the time it said you're

278
00:16:18.200 --> 00:16:20.519
<v Speaker 4>not getting any federal grants from us, then I mean

279
00:16:20.519 --> 00:16:20.919
<v Speaker 4>they went.

280
00:16:20.919 --> 00:16:21.679
<v Speaker 5>Much much further.

281
00:16:21.799 --> 00:16:27.320
<v Speaker 4>No pelgrants, no student loans, etc. So what Trump is

282
00:16:27.399 --> 00:16:30.799
<v Speaker 4>doing from a purely legal point of view is absolutely fine.

283
00:16:31.559 --> 00:16:35.120
<v Speaker 4>It's the political fight that matters, right, and how he

284
00:16:35.159 --> 00:16:35.960
<v Speaker 4>comes down on.

285
00:16:35.879 --> 00:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>That well stee So I think there's a great irony

286
00:16:40.399 --> 00:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>at work here if you go back in the record,

287
00:16:42.720 --> 00:16:45.200
<v Speaker 2>as they say, to the late forties and early fifties,

288
00:16:46.000 --> 00:16:48.279
<v Speaker 2>when you know Van ver Bush first set out our

289
00:16:48.360 --> 00:16:50.960
<v Speaker 2>science strategy for the federal government and the involved spending

290
00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:55.759
<v Speaker 2>research dollars through universities for science research right technical research,

291
00:16:56.399 --> 00:16:59.279
<v Speaker 2>and then again with the Secondary Education Act whatever it

292
00:16:59.320 --> 00:17:01.799
<v Speaker 2>was in nineteen five fifty eight, after the spot Nick crisis, Right,

293
00:17:01.840 --> 00:17:06.079
<v Speaker 2>we need more scientists. Around those years, the almost all

294
00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>of the presidents of Ivy League colleges said, we're not

295
00:17:08.759 --> 00:17:12.079
<v Speaker 2>sure this is a good idea because federal funding will

296
00:17:12.079 --> 00:17:15.640
<v Speaker 2>come with federal strings and maybe political domination from Washington,

297
00:17:16.039 --> 00:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>so we're not sure that. But on the other hand,

298
00:17:17.640 --> 00:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the money was just too lucrative and the purpose was

299
00:17:20.039 --> 00:17:24.200
<v Speaker 2>seemed so straightforward and sensible, right, more scientists, more scientific research,

300
00:17:24.880 --> 00:17:26.640
<v Speaker 2>that they succummed and went with it. So now all

301
00:17:26.680 --> 00:17:29.079
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, look where we are. I'll add one

302
00:17:29.079 --> 00:17:33.200
<v Speaker 2>more thing here to bolster Lucreatia's point. Stephen Pinker, who

303
00:17:33.240 --> 00:17:36.759
<v Speaker 2>is You know, he's some interesting guy. He's actually kind

304
00:17:36.759 --> 00:17:38.720
<v Speaker 2>of a liberal, but he's descended from the left and

305
00:17:38.799 --> 00:17:41.200
<v Speaker 2>resisted the left at Harvard. He had an article in

306
00:17:41.240 --> 00:17:43.039
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times a few days ago saying this

307
00:17:43.240 --> 00:17:46.480
<v Speaker 2>is terrible what Trump is doing. But then he spent

308
00:17:46.599 --> 00:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>like three or four paragraphs saying, but I want to

309
00:17:48.720 --> 00:17:51.440
<v Speaker 2>remind you, over the last six seven years, I've been

310
00:17:51.480 --> 00:17:54.640
<v Speaker 2>fighting wokeriy at Harvard, and I've been saying we need

311
00:17:54.640 --> 00:17:57.880
<v Speaker 2>more intellectual diversity. I've been fighting against quotas, this, this,

312
00:17:57.960 --> 00:18:00.200
<v Speaker 2>and this, And when he got to the end of

313
00:18:00.279 --> 00:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>his litany about how Harvard's imperfect, I thought, and yes,

314
00:18:03.519 --> 00:18:07.039
<v Speaker 2>what good has all that done? What changes have been made? None?

315
00:18:07.720 --> 00:18:10.759
<v Speaker 2>Harvard still gets an f from the Foundation for Individual

316
00:18:10.839 --> 00:18:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Rights and Expression for being the worst campus in the

317
00:18:14.160 --> 00:18:17.200
<v Speaker 2>country for free speech. And so the point is is

318
00:18:17.240 --> 00:18:21.079
<v Speaker 2>that nothing is going to change until the universities get

319
00:18:21.079 --> 00:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the metaphysical metaphorical equivalent of a two by four across

320
00:18:24.279 --> 00:18:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the head. And that's what Trump is doing. I'm sure

321
00:18:26.680 --> 00:18:31.119
<v Speaker 2>they're going to affect some useful medical research and other

322
00:18:31.200 --> 00:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>scientific research. I'm sure if this spreads. By the way, John,

323
00:18:34.559 --> 00:18:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, some of the best students that I've met

324
00:18:36.640 --> 00:18:38.839
<v Speaker 2>at Berkeley Law have been some of these Raeli students

325
00:18:39.079 --> 00:18:42.160
<v Speaker 2>who come over in the LLLM program, right, And they're

326
00:18:42.240 --> 00:18:45.440
<v Speaker 2>usually really good and really sensible and sound, and it'd

327
00:18:45.440 --> 00:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>be a shame if they're excluded from our universities. But

328
00:18:48.720 --> 00:18:51.519
<v Speaker 2>things are so bad with the universities that I agree

329
00:18:51.559 --> 00:18:54.440
<v Speaker 2>completely little Cretia that you know, the time for maximum

330
00:18:54.440 --> 00:18:59.319
<v Speaker 2>pressure has arrived. And again the fact that the universities

331
00:18:59.359 --> 00:19:02.119
<v Speaker 2>are fine the federal pressure when they agree with what

332
00:19:02.160 --> 00:19:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the federal government wants him to do, so they really

333
00:19:04.519 --> 00:19:06.599
<v Speaker 2>don't have much of a leg to stand on to complain. Now,

334
00:19:06.599 --> 00:19:07.279
<v Speaker 2>it seems to me.

335
00:19:08.880 --> 00:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So quick in question before we move on to Tariff's

336
00:19:13.240 --> 00:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Lucretia's favorite subject, mind you, but what else could Trump do?

337
00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So I both of you say this is part of

338
00:19:21.039 --> 00:19:26.599
<v Speaker 1>a almost like a cultural fight between Trump and the

339
00:19:26.640 --> 00:19:30.759
<v Speaker 1>groups in society he represents and higher education inc. Right,

340
00:19:31.400 --> 00:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>what else could Trump? Do? You know that Trump does

341
00:19:34.160 --> 00:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>seem to have Harvard and other universities on the back foot,

342
00:19:37.680 --> 00:19:40.039
<v Speaker 1>but they are fighting. They are Harvard is fighting back, right,

343
00:19:40.079 --> 00:19:42.839
<v Speaker 1>They've launched lawsuits, they've launched a I'm sure they're spending

344
00:19:42.839 --> 00:19:45.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money on a big PR campaign. You're

345
00:19:45.119 --> 00:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing Steve saying, you're seeing the effects and various you

346
00:19:47.680 --> 00:19:51.039
<v Speaker 1>know where other students gonna go tapped me to Israeli students.

347
00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:54.559
<v Speaker 1>What could Trump do next, Lucretia.

348
00:19:54.240 --> 00:19:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, remember that he's gotten Congress to increase the tax

349
00:19:59.720 --> 00:20:04.839
<v Speaker 4>on endowments or potentially, I mean, he's not doing that

350
00:20:04.920 --> 00:20:08.400
<v Speaker 4>on his own, but Congress would have never have decided

351
00:20:08.480 --> 00:20:11.319
<v Speaker 4>to do such a thing had Trump not pushed this

352
00:20:11.880 --> 00:20:17.000
<v Speaker 4>taxing tuition I mean, it's really all a matter of

353
00:20:17.039 --> 00:20:22.079
<v Speaker 4>going after going after Harvard from the point of view

354
00:20:22.119 --> 00:20:27.440
<v Speaker 4>of legitimate exercises of federal power, not all presidential power.

355
00:20:27.519 --> 00:20:30.160
<v Speaker 4>But you know, again getting Congress to do some of

356
00:20:30.200 --> 00:20:34.160
<v Speaker 4>these things too. But Trump leading the way means that Congress,

357
00:20:34.200 --> 00:20:38.680
<v Speaker 4>if Congress goes along with it, that does actually change

358
00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:41.920
<v Speaker 4>the dynamic a little bit. I think that that Harvard

359
00:20:41.920 --> 00:20:44.799
<v Speaker 4>will keep fighting. I saw on an article this morning,

360
00:20:44.799 --> 00:20:47.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it was by Turley, Jonathan Turley, who said

361
00:20:47.519 --> 00:20:51.160
<v Speaker 4>that this is a This is Trump is Grant and

362
00:20:51.319 --> 00:20:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Harvard is the Confederacy, and basically Trump is likely even

363
00:20:56.759 --> 00:20:59.319
<v Speaker 4>though he's likely to lose some just like Grant did.

364
00:21:00.079 --> 00:21:04.119
<v Speaker 4>This is a war of attrition, and from that point

365
00:21:04.160 --> 00:21:08.119
<v Speaker 4>of view, Trump has considerably more resources at his disposal

366
00:21:08.160 --> 00:21:08.920
<v Speaker 4>than Harvard does.

367
00:21:10.720 --> 00:21:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

368
00:21:11.599 --> 00:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, I mean, what about what other what are errors

369
00:21:14.160 --> 00:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>are in the Trump quiver waiting to be well?

370
00:21:16.720 --> 00:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>I think, well, something that he's already doing apparently, but

371
00:21:19.640 --> 00:21:22.799
<v Speaker 2>I think should be broadened is Trump has said we

372
00:21:22.839 --> 00:21:25.200
<v Speaker 2>want to put a limit of fifteen percent on overhead

373
00:21:25.200 --> 00:21:27.599
<v Speaker 2>for federal grants, which seems like reasonable fee to me,

374
00:21:27.640 --> 00:21:29.319
<v Speaker 2>and so we know some are much higher than that.

375
00:21:29.519 --> 00:21:31.279
<v Speaker 2>But I think it should be broadened and make an

376
00:21:31.359 --> 00:21:34.839
<v Speaker 2>explicit war on administrative bloat. And I don't know what

377
00:21:34.880 --> 00:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the legal grounds for that would be. I mean, my

378
00:21:37.240 --> 00:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>other thought is you price controls on tuition increases. I

379
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:42.599
<v Speaker 2>don't think the president has authority to do that, and

380
00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:44.519
<v Speaker 2>it would require an Act of Congress. But I still

381
00:21:44.559 --> 00:21:48.359
<v Speaker 2>think that again, some threats about the absolutely undisplicant and

382
00:21:48.480 --> 00:21:51.880
<v Speaker 2>profligate spending of the universities ought to be a major target.

383
00:21:52.240 --> 00:21:53.599
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, there is a tribute to the

384
00:21:53.599 --> 00:21:56.160
<v Speaker 2>middle class. You know, it used to be that you

385
00:21:56.319 --> 00:21:59.880
<v Speaker 2>could even you know, private university forty fifty years ago,

386
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>if you worked hard at a summer job, you could

387
00:22:01.960 --> 00:22:04.279
<v Speaker 2>pretty much pay your full year's tuition and room and board.

388
00:22:04.880 --> 00:22:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Now it's not even remotely possible for someone who wants

389
00:22:07.240 --> 00:22:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to do that, even with some financial aid. And that's

390
00:22:09.680 --> 00:22:12.519
<v Speaker 2>the fault of the universities and the federal government subsidizing

391
00:22:13.160 --> 00:22:15.319
<v Speaker 2>your student loans and things like that. So I think

392
00:22:15.359 --> 00:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>maximum pressure on the university is to cut their straight

393
00:22:18.119 --> 00:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>bloat and cut their costs. But Mitch Daniels has proved

394
00:22:21.440 --> 00:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not hard to do. You know, Purdue froze their

395
00:22:24.279 --> 00:22:27.759
<v Speaker 2>tuition what fifteen years ago now and hasn't raised it once.

396
00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:30.920
<v Speaker 2>It's not hard to do, it's just the other collologists

397
00:22:30.920 --> 00:22:32.440
<v Speaker 2>won't do it, so make them do it.

398
00:22:33.039 --> 00:22:37.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would never underestimate the amount of money that

399
00:22:37.400 --> 00:22:41.720
<v Speaker 4>is spent on administrative bloat, not all of which is DEI,

400
00:22:41.960 --> 00:22:44.200
<v Speaker 4>but much of it is. And I just want to

401
00:22:44.200 --> 00:22:47.240
<v Speaker 4>tell you that I was meeting with my university CFO.

402
00:22:47.960 --> 00:22:50.960
<v Speaker 4>And of course, you know, my college has had lots

403
00:22:51.000 --> 00:22:55.279
<v Speaker 4>of money. The universities now two hundred and seventy million

404
00:22:55.359 --> 00:22:59.400
<v Speaker 4>dollars in debt, two hundred and seventy million dollars.

405
00:22:59.039 --> 00:23:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Because they're just the idiots.

406
00:23:00.079 --> 00:23:03.200
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, so I said, well, because this is a

407
00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:05.279
<v Speaker 4>few months ago, I said, you know the fact that

408
00:23:05.319 --> 00:23:10.839
<v Speaker 4>you have to fire all of those DEI pro vice

409
00:23:10.920 --> 00:23:13.960
<v Speaker 4>provos and assistant provos and assistant deans and this and that.

410
00:23:14.039 --> 00:23:16.079
<v Speaker 4>I said, I want to save you a lot of money,

411
00:23:16.079 --> 00:23:20.960
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't it. You know, no, no answer. And then, of course,

412
00:23:21.000 --> 00:23:24.799
<v Speaker 4>because what's happened except in my college, is that all

413
00:23:24.839 --> 00:23:27.880
<v Speaker 4>of those all of those people got new jobs that

414
00:23:28.720 --> 00:23:33.079
<v Speaker 4>are belonging in community oriented instead of they don't have

415
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:36.359
<v Speaker 4>DEI because those are the buzzwords that they search for

416
00:23:36.440 --> 00:23:39.480
<v Speaker 4>on web pages and so on. But you know, they

417
00:23:39.480 --> 00:23:41.359
<v Speaker 4>didn't get rid of any of those people when they

418
00:23:41.400 --> 00:23:44.039
<v Speaker 4>could have, And so I don't feel sorry for him.

419
00:23:44.119 --> 00:23:44.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't.

420
00:23:44.799 --> 00:23:48.119
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's ridiculous. I don't.

421
00:23:48.240 --> 00:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Trump's going to continue you heard it here. First,

422
00:23:51.920 --> 00:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump will continue hitting universities in the pocketbook, which is

423
00:23:55.000 --> 00:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>where they really really live. So let's move to an

424
00:24:00.079 --> 00:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>their pocketbook issue, which is tariffs. So just late yesterday,

425
00:24:05.680 --> 00:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the Court of International Trade. Let me explain a very

426
00:24:09.240 --> 00:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>obscure but still federal court that exists to essentially rule

427
00:24:15.240 --> 00:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>only on trade issues. So, for example, if you think

428
00:24:18.480 --> 00:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>some country is cheating you in their imports and should

429
00:24:21.720 --> 00:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>get some kind of extra duty put on their products,

430
00:24:25.240 --> 00:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you go to the Court of a national Trader. You

431
00:24:27.039 --> 00:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think your product's been misclassified and is in the wrong

432
00:24:29.680 --> 00:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>tariff schedule, you go to the Court of in National Trade.

433
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure why it's even a court. I don't

434
00:24:36.160 --> 00:24:37.759
<v Speaker 1>know why you need a court for this. I'm not

435
00:24:37.799 --> 00:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>sure why it's an Article three court. Why these are

436
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:41.759
<v Speaker 1>lifetime federal judicial appointments.

437
00:24:42.480 --> 00:24:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Wait, John, are they lifetime appointments or are they That's.

438
00:24:45.519 --> 00:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Another weird thing that's another weird thing. These are Article

439
00:24:48.440 --> 00:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>three federal judges. You would have thought these people would

440
00:24:51.200 --> 00:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be more like immigration judges or something.

441
00:24:53.720 --> 00:24:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me ask a question here, just for information purposes,

442
00:24:56.160 --> 00:24:58.559
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, I thought under Article three that the

443
00:24:59.039 --> 00:25:03.000
<v Speaker 2>clause that Congress and create inferior courts, Man, there could

444
00:25:03.000 --> 00:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>be courts that weren't, you know, Article three lifetime tenures,

445
00:25:06.039 --> 00:25:07.000
<v Speaker 2>for example, the court.

446
00:25:06.799 --> 00:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Of Yeah, that's a different power.

447
00:25:09.720 --> 00:25:10.799
<v Speaker 2>Well is that okay?

448
00:25:10.839 --> 00:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's a good conservative, Steve, it's a good conservative.

449
00:25:13.400 --> 00:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Your instinct is right that why are there any of

450
00:25:16.119 --> 00:25:19.880
<v Speaker 1>these non lifetime court federal courts at all? They seem unconstitutional?

451
00:25:20.400 --> 00:25:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think i'm.

452
00:25:21.440 --> 00:25:24.240
<v Speaker 4>They're generally Article one courts, right, is what they are.

453
00:25:24.240 --> 00:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Generally Article what we call Article one courts, and conservatives

454
00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have long thought these things were unconstitutional.

455
00:25:31.119 --> 00:25:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Just another quick question is that the Court of Federal Claims,

456
00:25:34.680 --> 00:25:36.400
<v Speaker 2>which is where you go most of the time, it's

457
00:25:36.400 --> 00:25:38.799
<v Speaker 2>for contract disbuse with the federal government. If you have

458
00:25:38.799 --> 00:25:40.559
<v Speaker 2>a contract with the federal government, you take it there.

459
00:25:40.759 --> 00:25:42.200
<v Speaker 2>But it has been a quarter over the years that

460
00:25:42.279 --> 00:25:45.319
<v Speaker 2>heard some takings claims back in the eighties that you know,

461
00:25:45.400 --> 00:25:47.319
<v Speaker 2>under Lauren Smith when he was the chief judge. Is

462
00:25:47.319 --> 00:25:49.279
<v Speaker 2>that an Article one court or an Article three court?

463
00:25:49.400 --> 00:25:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Yes, this is the weird thing. If you have a

464
00:25:53.079 --> 00:25:55.039
<v Speaker 1>case where the government breaks a contract with you or

465
00:25:55.119 --> 00:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>takes your property, you go to a non Article three court,

466
00:25:59.240 --> 00:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you have stupid trade dispute you go to

467
00:26:02.279 --> 00:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an Article three court. It makes no sense. Okay, John, Before,

468
00:26:06.559 --> 00:26:08.759
<v Speaker 1>can I just explain the larger constitution. This is a

469
00:26:08.759 --> 00:26:13.039
<v Speaker 1>really interesting constitutional question that conservatives in general don't like

470
00:26:13.079 --> 00:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what Congress has done, although some like Renquists do. Actually,

471
00:26:16.200 --> 00:26:18.599
<v Speaker 1>this might be a positivist versus natural law thing now

472
00:26:18.599 --> 00:26:20.319
<v Speaker 1>they think about it. I never thought of it that way.

473
00:26:20.680 --> 00:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So you could Steve point to the right power. The

474
00:26:24.880 --> 00:26:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Constitution says Congress can create inferior tribunals. A conservative would say, then,

475
00:26:30.400 --> 00:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, every time Congress creates one that's a

476
00:26:33.000 --> 00:26:36.839
<v Speaker 1>federal court and gets the judge gets lifetime protection. Can

477
00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>only be repoved through impeachment if they if they don't

478
00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:43.039
<v Speaker 1>engage in you know, you say, they engage in un

479
00:26:43.119 --> 00:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>good behavior and bad behavior.

480
00:26:44.799 --> 00:26:45.039
<v Speaker 2>Right.

481
00:26:45.559 --> 00:26:48.839
<v Speaker 1>But in the late nineteenth century, this is a progressive

482
00:26:48.880 --> 00:26:54.279
<v Speaker 1>era thing. Congress started creating courts, but they didn't give

483
00:26:54.319 --> 00:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>them the protections of Article three. These judges, So today

484
00:26:58.519 --> 00:27:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the biggest one is immigration courts, but you also mentioned

485
00:27:02.279 --> 00:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one to Steve, the Court of Federal Claims.

486
00:27:04.720 --> 00:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>So they're maritime course.

487
00:27:11.240 --> 00:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>No, they're not maritime court. There's a thing called maritime jurisdiction.

488
00:27:15.000 --> 00:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But they're not special like they're prize There used to

489
00:27:17.640 --> 00:27:22.319
<v Speaker 1>be prize courts, right. But so conservatives have long struggled

490
00:27:22.319 --> 00:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>with this. They've said, like, how can Congress create judges

491
00:27:25.720 --> 00:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and courts but doesn't give them lifetime tenure like the

492
00:27:28.960 --> 00:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Court of Federal Claims. Those judges have a set term

493
00:27:31.920 --> 00:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of years, and so doesn't that mean those judges can

494
00:27:35.920 --> 00:27:39.599
<v Speaker 1>be pressured and controlled by Congress and the president. Why

495
00:27:39.599 --> 00:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>do they get to be called judges at all? So

496
00:27:42.160 --> 00:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing. On the other hand, there are people

497
00:27:43.680 --> 00:27:45.839
<v Speaker 1>like Renkquists who used to say, ah, this is great,

498
00:27:45.880 --> 00:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise how would we process He said, every social

499
00:27:50.400 --> 00:27:53.559
<v Speaker 1>security case right, every change in social security benefits is

500
00:27:53.599 --> 00:27:56.039
<v Speaker 1>a federal right. And he said they'd be impossible to

501
00:27:56.039 --> 00:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have enough federal judges to do that.

502
00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:00.160
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, so it's a kay.

503
00:28:00.200 --> 00:28:01.680
<v Speaker 4>No, I wasn't trying to interrupt.

504
00:28:01.680 --> 00:28:02.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm just trying to understand.

505
00:28:02.960 --> 00:28:07.519
<v Speaker 4>So the Article one power in Article one, Section eight

506
00:28:07.640 --> 00:28:11.960
<v Speaker 4>is to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court. The

507
00:28:12.079 --> 00:28:18.359
<v Speaker 4>Article three power is the judicial power of the United States.

508
00:28:18.559 --> 00:28:21.200
<v Speaker 4>The judicial power of the United States shall be in

509
00:28:21.240 --> 00:28:24.599
<v Speaker 4>vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts

510
00:28:24.599 --> 00:28:27.200
<v Speaker 4>as the Congress may from time to time ordain and established.

511
00:28:27.240 --> 00:28:29.799
<v Speaker 4>So I think what you were saying is is that

512
00:28:29.839 --> 00:28:34.960
<v Speaker 4>you shouldn't consider those two separate powers. That the definition

513
00:28:35.039 --> 00:28:39.440
<v Speaker 4>of the judicial power is any any court that exercises

514
00:28:39.519 --> 00:28:43.200
<v Speaker 4>judicial power would come under Article three. And it just

515
00:28:43.319 --> 00:28:47.640
<v Speaker 4>makes it clear that it's Congress that is the one

516
00:28:47.680 --> 00:28:51.920
<v Speaker 4>who creates those It says it twice basically, right.

517
00:28:53.119 --> 00:28:56.319
<v Speaker 1>As I say, Conservatives think about it is legal concerns

518
00:28:56.359 --> 00:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>would say, well, it's just like the executive power. Congress

519
00:29:00.079 --> 00:29:03.559
<v Speaker 1>can create agencies, but once they're agencies, then the President

520
00:29:03.559 --> 00:29:06.079
<v Speaker 1>controls them when they become executive in nature, and they

521
00:29:06.119 --> 00:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have to run along the same they run in the

522
00:29:08.880 --> 00:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>same way, same with the provision Steve mentioned. Congress can

523
00:29:12.440 --> 00:29:15.119
<v Speaker 1>create courts, but once they're courts, they have to operate

524
00:29:15.160 --> 00:29:19.599
<v Speaker 1>under Article three. And because of the progressive era, we

525
00:29:19.680 --> 00:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>have these bizarre courts, but they don't operate within Article

526
00:29:23.759 --> 00:29:27.079
<v Speaker 1>three they operate, just however Congress chooses to tell them

527
00:29:27.119 --> 00:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to operate.

528
00:29:28.079 --> 00:29:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's go back to your trade court for just

529
00:29:29.960 --> 00:29:33.079
<v Speaker 4>a minute. Then I'm going to play Devil's advocate here.

530
00:29:33.160 --> 00:29:36.480
<v Speaker 4>If that's the case, then a your trade court, what's

531
00:29:36.480 --> 00:29:37.759
<v Speaker 4>it called again? International court?

532
00:29:37.920 --> 00:29:39.799
<v Speaker 1>What's it called Order of International Trade?

533
00:29:39.839 --> 00:29:41.599
<v Speaker 5>The cit see ida.

534
00:29:42.799 --> 00:29:45.279
<v Speaker 4>Then in fact it should be an Article three court.

535
00:29:45.920 --> 00:29:52.240
<v Speaker 4>And isn't Congress's power over the anything below the Supreme

536
00:29:52.279 --> 00:29:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Court plenary in the sense that as long as it

537
00:29:56.799 --> 00:30:01.519
<v Speaker 4>is in fact a so what the judicial power extends

538
00:30:01.559 --> 00:30:04.119
<v Speaker 4>to an Article three which is in section two, all

539
00:30:04.160 --> 00:30:08.240
<v Speaker 4>of those different descriptions of the kinds of cases the

540
00:30:08.279 --> 00:30:10.680
<v Speaker 4>court is allowed to hear, it's your courts are allowed

541
00:30:10.680 --> 00:30:13.759
<v Speaker 4>to hear. Then then Congress can do pretty much what

542
00:30:13.880 --> 00:30:16.519
<v Speaker 4>it wants to. It's not necessarily held, for instance, to

543
00:30:17.079 --> 00:30:20.119
<v Speaker 4>the judicial system created and the Judiciaryict of seventeen eighty

544
00:30:20.200 --> 00:30:22.119
<v Speaker 4>nine and eighteen oh one, and on and on and on.

545
00:30:22.599 --> 00:30:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Is that an unfair way of looking at it?

546
00:30:25.359 --> 00:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, I think you're about to be hired

547
00:30:27.519 --> 00:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>as a clerk on the Court of International Trade. Not

548
00:30:31.440 --> 00:30:32.799
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a good idea.

549
00:30:32.839 --> 00:30:34.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm just saying, I'm just kids.

550
00:30:34.680 --> 00:30:36.759
<v Speaker 1>No. The judges on the Federal Court of a nature

551
00:30:36.880 --> 00:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>often teased about this because I know one or two

552
00:30:41.000 --> 00:30:42.799
<v Speaker 1>of them, and I always say to them, I don't

553
00:30:42.839 --> 00:30:45.279
<v Speaker 1>understand why you're a court. I agree with you, Lucretia.

554
00:30:45.279 --> 00:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to be a court, you should have

555
00:30:47.599 --> 00:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>lifetime tenure. You should be a federal court. Why do

556
00:30:51.480 --> 00:30:54.279
<v Speaker 1>we need a court to adjust tariff schedules is beyond me,

557
00:30:54.440 --> 00:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what I mean. There's no real federal rights at

558
00:30:56.680 --> 00:30:57.119
<v Speaker 1>issue here.

559
00:30:57.279 --> 00:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not well, we seem to be.

560
00:30:58.400 --> 00:30:59.359
<v Speaker 1>We seem to be at the point.

561
00:31:00.599 --> 00:31:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, we've seing to be at the point where I

562
00:31:03.319 --> 00:31:05.839
<v Speaker 2>expect any day now the judge Wattner, the People's Court

563
00:31:05.920 --> 00:31:08.279
<v Speaker 2>is going to hand down a ruling against Trump.

564
00:31:09.200 --> 00:31:12.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's that's the next point. But then let me

565
00:31:12.839 --> 00:31:14.920
<v Speaker 4>go one step for last time we talked about this,

566
00:31:15.000 --> 00:31:17.720
<v Speaker 4>and Steve actually almost cut the whole thing, but we

567
00:31:17.759 --> 00:31:22.079
<v Speaker 4>didn't really get to finish. If if Congress has plenary

568
00:31:22.200 --> 00:31:26.359
<v Speaker 4>power over the district courts and the appellate courts, even

569
00:31:26.440 --> 00:31:29.680
<v Speaker 4>though we have long traditions of them operating a certain

570
00:31:29.720 --> 00:31:32.200
<v Speaker 4>way and being organized in a certain way, could not

571
00:31:32.279 --> 00:31:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Congress pass a law completely or redefining a case in

572
00:31:40.079 --> 00:31:43.240
<v Speaker 4>controversy and parties before the court. In other words, couldn't

573
00:31:43.279 --> 00:31:48.319
<v Speaker 4>Congress quite easily pass a law forbidding universal injunctions by

574
00:31:48.359 --> 00:31:50.799
<v Speaker 4>district courts? I mean that is within their power?

575
00:31:50.920 --> 00:31:51.359
<v Speaker 5>Correct?

576
00:31:52.319 --> 00:31:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I would think so, But there is a whole court.

577
00:31:55.359 --> 00:31:59.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean Lucretia's usual asks a very simple sounds like

578
00:31:59.119 --> 00:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a very simple question, but it is not. There's a

579
00:32:01.240 --> 00:32:04.839
<v Speaker 1>whole course on this question in law school called federal courts,

580
00:32:05.279 --> 00:32:09.599
<v Speaker 1>because what they actually the harder issue is, suppose Congress

581
00:32:09.640 --> 00:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just said the lower courts can't hear immigration cases. Right,

582
00:32:14.000 --> 00:32:16.799
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna write, you know, how far could Congress go in?

583
00:32:18.200 --> 00:32:20.079
<v Speaker 1>And could they do that to the Supreme Court too?

584
00:32:20.519 --> 00:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Could they do it by saying there will be no

585
00:32:22.720 --> 00:32:26.319
<v Speaker 1>appeals to the Supreme Court right in immigration cases? There's

586
00:32:26.400 --> 00:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>literally a whole course about this subject about how far

587
00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:32.839
<v Speaker 1>can Congress go and its control of the courts. I

588
00:32:32.920 --> 00:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to be a congress can like you said, the

589
00:32:35.920 --> 00:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>creature has pleundary power of those courts, and so they

590
00:32:38.160 --> 00:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>can say you can issue certain kinds of injunctions but

591
00:32:41.079 --> 00:32:43.119
<v Speaker 1>not others. You can hear certain kinds of cases but

592
00:32:43.240 --> 00:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>not others. I would tell you ninety five I think percent.

593
00:32:48.039 --> 00:32:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I would bet of constitutional law professors believe, however, that

594
00:32:53.160 --> 00:32:56.759
<v Speaker 1>there is something they call the essential functions thesis, that

595
00:32:56.799 --> 00:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>there's some essential function of the federal course that cannot

596
00:32:59.480 --> 00:33:03.319
<v Speaker 1>be taken way by Congress. Congress can create the court,

597
00:33:03.759 --> 00:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but there's some right, some nub that Congress can't go

598
00:33:07.720 --> 00:33:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and changing their central function. Now where that comes from

599
00:33:12.359 --> 00:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and what it is is totally seems like, you know whatever,

600
00:33:16.640 --> 00:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I the beholder, go ahead, the creature, then we'll get

601
00:33:19.240 --> 00:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to this.

602
00:33:20.119 --> 00:33:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know, I'm sorry, I'm really taking this.

603
00:33:21.599 --> 00:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>This is far. Let me tell listeners, this is far

604
00:33:24.000 --> 00:33:26.759
<v Speaker 1>more interesting than the decision, believe me, But go ahead.

605
00:33:27.440 --> 00:33:30.680
<v Speaker 4>So the other day there was an article Steve and

606
00:33:30.720 --> 00:33:32.920
<v Speaker 4>I discussed it briefly before you came on by Mark

607
00:33:33.000 --> 00:33:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Mark Halprin in the Wall Street Journal, and one of

608
00:33:35.640 --> 00:33:38.720
<v Speaker 4>the things he said, I wish I had the article

609
00:33:38.720 --> 00:33:41.119
<v Speaker 4>in front of me. He said something really dumb, which

610
00:33:41.279 --> 00:33:47.799
<v Speaker 4>was that after you know that, then all these universal injunctions, Yeah,

611
00:33:47.839 --> 00:33:49.359
<v Speaker 4>maybe they weren't such a great idea.

612
00:33:49.519 --> 00:33:50.000
<v Speaker 5>The left.

613
00:33:50.359 --> 00:33:54.200
<v Speaker 4>The left is guilty of ignoring the Constitution. The right

614
00:33:54.240 --> 00:33:55.839
<v Speaker 4>is guilty of ignoring the Constitution.

615
00:33:56.319 --> 00:33:57.119
<v Speaker 5>But then he.

616
00:33:57.400 --> 00:34:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Chastised, I'm not exactly sure whom I guess the right

617
00:34:01.759 --> 00:34:07.480
<v Speaker 4>in general for talking about impeaching these federal judges who

618
00:34:07.480 --> 00:34:12.239
<v Speaker 4>were issuing universal injunctions against the Trump administration even though

619
00:34:12.239 --> 00:34:15.039
<v Speaker 4>the things were popular, etcetera, etcetera. And he made this

620
00:34:15.119 --> 00:34:18.800
<v Speaker 4>really stupid argument, talking about impeaching and other kinds of

621
00:34:19.840 --> 00:34:22.599
<v Speaker 4>ways of fighting back against the court instead of just

622
00:34:23.719 --> 00:34:29.280
<v Speaker 4>upholding the Constitution and gracefully taking the loss. Something along

623
00:34:29.320 --> 00:34:33.400
<v Speaker 4>those lines. What a stupid thing to say. And it

624
00:34:33.480 --> 00:34:35.639
<v Speaker 4>reminds me of the discussion you and I had about

625
00:34:35.639 --> 00:34:40.239
<v Speaker 4>the exceptions clause. You may not want judges to be

626
00:34:40.360 --> 00:34:43.840
<v Speaker 4>impeached every time they make an unpopular decision, but there's

627
00:34:44.039 --> 00:34:47.000
<v Speaker 4>nothing in the Constitution that prevents that. It is a

628
00:34:47.079 --> 00:34:52.360
<v Speaker 4>perfectly legitimate exercise of Congress, the power of Congress to

629
00:34:52.480 --> 00:34:56.639
<v Speaker 4>impeach and convict a judge. We're not even sure why

630
00:34:56.800 --> 00:34:57.960
<v Speaker 4>for bad behavior.

631
00:34:58.400 --> 00:34:59.239
<v Speaker 5>You know, that was the.

632
00:34:59.159 --> 00:35:04.679
<v Speaker 4>Whole debate way back in the early eighteen hundreds about

633
00:35:04.719 --> 00:35:08.320
<v Speaker 4>whether you had to impeach a judge for high crimes

634
00:35:08.320 --> 00:35:09.679
<v Speaker 4>and misdemeanors.

635
00:35:09.119 --> 00:35:10.400
<v Speaker 5>Or you could just do it because you didn't like

636
00:35:10.480 --> 00:35:11.239
<v Speaker 5>his rulings.

637
00:35:11.280 --> 00:35:13.920
<v Speaker 4>And they decided I guess sort of in the favor

638
00:35:13.960 --> 00:35:17.559
<v Speaker 4>of a more exacting standard, but it's not clear if

639
00:35:17.599 --> 00:35:22.760
<v Speaker 4>the Constitution requires that. Impeachment seems to be one of

640
00:35:22.800 --> 00:35:27.079
<v Speaker 4>those very important checks on the court that our founding

641
00:35:27.119 --> 00:35:31.119
<v Speaker 4>fathers established, along with the exceptions clause, neither of which

642
00:35:31.119 --> 00:35:33.480
<v Speaker 4>are used to check the court in any way, shape

643
00:35:33.559 --> 00:35:34.360
<v Speaker 4>or form.

644
00:35:35.000 --> 00:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that's fair that the idea we

645
00:35:37.920 --> 00:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>don't impeach judges because we disagree with the decisions is

646
00:35:41.960 --> 00:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not in the Constitution as much as it's just something

647
00:35:45.000 --> 00:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that we've had since the Jefferson impeachments failed. And you know,

648
00:35:50.000 --> 00:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that's more political norm than you know, claim the Constitution

649
00:35:53.920 --> 00:35:56.559
<v Speaker 1>prohibits it. And there are people who've said, why doesn't

650
00:35:57.400 --> 00:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>bad behavior include the idea of getting something deliberately wrong

651
00:36:01.360 --> 00:36:03.639
<v Speaker 1>or really wrong or abusing your powers. So there's a

652
00:36:03.639 --> 00:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>difference between you know, getting a hard question of law

653
00:36:06.519 --> 00:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>right and a judge, you know, seizing legislative power. Well,

654
00:36:10.519 --> 00:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's executive power, perfectly fair, Yeah, exactly.

655
00:36:13.039 --> 00:36:16.000
<v Speaker 2>But look, it all goes back to that Wiley John Marshall.

656
00:36:16.079 --> 00:36:18.679
<v Speaker 2>If he had found and and issued a rid of

657
00:36:18.760 --> 00:36:21.199
<v Speaker 2>man damus for Jefferson to deliver the commission that will

658
00:36:21.199 --> 00:36:23.880
<v Speaker 2>be in myberry. Maybe he would have been impeached and

659
00:36:23.920 --> 00:36:27.519
<v Speaker 2>the president wouldn't have been respect for judicial complete juditional independence.

660
00:36:27.559 --> 00:36:29.880
<v Speaker 2>But maybe we'd be impeaching judges left and right since.

661
00:36:29.719 --> 00:36:34.440
<v Speaker 4>The Remember Marshall was so concerned about the possibility of

662
00:36:35.519 --> 00:36:39.360
<v Speaker 4>setting the precedent of using impeachment to get rid of

663
00:36:39.440 --> 00:36:43.239
<v Speaker 4>judges for political reasons that he was ready to give

664
00:36:43.360 --> 00:36:47.639
<v Speaker 4>up entirely the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

665
00:36:50.679 --> 00:36:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember that part, but I do know our

666
00:36:52.440 --> 00:36:56.599
<v Speaker 2>late friend Michael Yulman, our late friend Michael Uman Yulman

667
00:36:56.719 --> 00:36:59.519
<v Speaker 2>used to say, you know, marshall worship is out of

668
00:36:59.559 --> 00:37:02.800
<v Speaker 2>hand or there's a contrary case to be made about him,

669
00:37:03.079 --> 00:37:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and he liked to do that sort of thing. But

670
00:37:04.840 --> 00:37:06.159
<v Speaker 2>I but, but, John, I mean.

671
00:37:06.039 --> 00:37:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more question of what's good government. And

672
00:37:08.320 --> 00:37:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it is good that we don't impeach judges

673
00:37:10.760 --> 00:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for bad decisions. Just it's good. Then the Federal I

674
00:37:15.360 --> 00:37:17.639
<v Speaker 1>just think it's good the Federal Reserve Board is independent

675
00:37:17.760 --> 00:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of political control, even though I don't think constitutionally it is.

676
00:37:20.360 --> 00:37:23.039
<v Speaker 1>It's a yeah, but away, let me let's get to

677
00:37:23.039 --> 00:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the substant decision.

678
00:37:23.840 --> 00:37:26.000
<v Speaker 4>We get interesting.

679
00:37:25.719 --> 00:37:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Issue, right, Yeah, you know, I am the og Neo

680
00:37:29.280 --> 00:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>kan as you said, and I was at the Neo

681
00:37:32.039 --> 00:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>con conclave. As Steve said, it's the only voting member left.

682
00:37:36.280 --> 00:37:37.639
<v Speaker 2>I think they're at the conclave.

683
00:37:38.400 --> 00:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So but let's let me let's let me describe the

684
00:37:40.480 --> 00:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>substance of the decision and get your thoughts because if

685
00:37:43.960 --> 00:37:46.119
<v Speaker 1>you were I actually have to say, if you were

686
00:37:46.119 --> 00:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a supporter of Trump, this is not such a bad

687
00:37:48.400 --> 00:37:52.199
<v Speaker 1>decision because it's so badly done that his chances on

688
00:37:52.280 --> 00:37:56.599
<v Speaker 1>appeal actually really could I'm very surprised by how, you know,

689
00:37:56.639 --> 00:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>weak this decision is. So the decision, says uh, And

690
00:38:00.920 --> 00:38:03.559
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to Nixon, Steve's favorite president. For a

691
00:38:03.639 --> 00:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>law that will not be named, but basically sad there

692
00:38:06.519 --> 00:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>was a law called the Trading with the Enemy Act

693
00:38:09.000 --> 00:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen seventeen, classic Woodrow Wilson progressive law. It said

694
00:38:13.320 --> 00:38:18.079
<v Speaker 1>basically that the president can impose almost any economic sanction

695
00:38:18.400 --> 00:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or any economic measure in the event of war national emergency.

696
00:38:22.920 --> 00:38:26.599
<v Speaker 2>And what note that was the law years go ahead, Well,

697
00:38:26.679 --> 00:38:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Roosevelt from Roosevelt invoked that law to do the bank

698
00:38:30.400 --> 00:38:31.840
<v Speaker 2>holiday in nineteen thirty three.

699
00:38:32.159 --> 00:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>What yes, so, yeah, presidents started saying national emergency. I

700
00:38:37.519 --> 00:38:41.280
<v Speaker 1>can yes, go off the gold standard. See this was well,

701
00:38:41.320 --> 00:38:44.039
<v Speaker 1>I was heavily abused by FDR when he took office.

702
00:38:44.480 --> 00:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And so Nixon basically tried to impose tariffs under this

703
00:38:49.480 --> 00:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>law called the TUIA. It's called and so after and

704
00:38:53.880 --> 00:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the Watergate reforms, the Congress passed

705
00:38:57.800 --> 00:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the IEPA law, and that's the law it's issued today,

706
00:39:00.119 --> 00:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the International Economic Emergency Powers Act AIPA of nineteen seventy seven.

707
00:39:07.119 --> 00:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh you know, that was going to be my sixth

708
00:39:08.920 --> 00:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>law of jurisprudence that we'd get to is that any

709
00:39:13.039 --> 00:39:17.039
<v Speaker 1>law passed in the nineteen seventies is a bad laws.

710
00:39:17.119 --> 00:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Just like yah, yeah, set it's too easy, Yeah, too easy,

711
00:39:20.280 --> 00:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>too easy. But you know, so this court held. So

712
00:39:24.480 --> 00:39:27.599
<v Speaker 1>President Trump said, triggered, he said there's a national emergency

713
00:39:27.639 --> 00:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>because of these. He actually issued two that irrelevant. One

714
00:39:31.079 --> 00:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>was the trafficking infentanyl and drugs and drug cartels and

715
00:39:36.480 --> 00:39:41.159
<v Speaker 1>illegal aliens across our northern and southern borders through Canada, Mexico,

716
00:39:41.719 --> 00:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and because of China. So that's one set of tariffs

717
00:39:45.920 --> 00:39:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and then another set and those parts were just named

718
00:39:48.320 --> 00:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a Canada Mexico and China. Then there was another set

719
00:39:51.320 --> 00:39:55.039
<v Speaker 1>of tariffs, which the court calls worldwide tariffs, where right

720
00:39:55.039 --> 00:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump triggered a national emergency. Said it was because of

721
00:39:57.400 --> 00:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the trade deficit. And if you remember, put tariffs on

722
00:40:01.480 --> 00:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>every country in the world, and you know, with different variations.

723
00:40:05.519 --> 00:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So the court yesterday struck them both down and said,

724
00:40:10.000 --> 00:40:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and here's the weird logic of it. It said, Uh,

725
00:40:12.920 --> 00:40:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the ip A law could not possibly give Trump or

726
00:40:16.840 --> 00:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>any president this power, because it did, it would be

727
00:40:19.960 --> 00:40:23.039
<v Speaker 1>too broad a power. And if it's this broad of power,

728
00:40:23.880 --> 00:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't think Congress would have done that. We don't

729
00:40:26.480 --> 00:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>think even though the law says the president is allowed

730
00:40:29.000 --> 00:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to regulate any international transaction with a country that he

731
00:40:33.440 --> 00:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>specifies an event of an international emergency that he declares,

732
00:40:37.480 --> 00:40:40.119
<v Speaker 1>so this is this is so that's what. Uh. And

733
00:40:40.159 --> 00:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>then the second thing, and it gets even worse. So

734
00:40:44.800 --> 00:40:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the law says that the president's allowed to issue these

735
00:40:49.199 --> 00:40:53.519
<v Speaker 1>kinds of orders in order to deal with an international emergency.

736
00:40:54.000 --> 00:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The court says, tariffs don't deal with the trade deficit.

737
00:40:58.079 --> 00:41:01.039
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sorry, let me freeze that. Tariffs don't deal

738
00:41:01.119 --> 00:41:04.599
<v Speaker 1>with the trafficking issues. Tariffs aren't going to reduce fentanyl.

739
00:41:04.639 --> 00:41:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Tariffs aren't going to reduce the movement by drug cartels

740
00:41:08.079 --> 00:41:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and terrorist groups across our borders. So the court actually

741
00:41:10.719 --> 00:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>said deals with an international emergency is not met here.

742
00:41:14.800 --> 00:41:16.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the most bit. I actually think this is

743
00:41:16.760 --> 00:41:19.280
<v Speaker 1>such a weak opinion when you when you hear the

744
00:41:19.320 --> 00:41:22.320
<v Speaker 1>actual logic of the court. And so that's another reason

745
00:41:22.360 --> 00:41:24.599
<v Speaker 1>I was teasing when lucushe is saying, why are you

746
00:41:24.599 --> 00:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>saying these are bof of course, I was like, here's

747
00:41:26.239 --> 00:41:28.599
<v Speaker 1>a good example. These are judges who spend all their

748
00:41:28.639 --> 00:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dial time saying is this important? All like an educational product?

749
00:41:32.440 --> 00:41:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Are they under the rife tariff schedules? They can't deal

750
00:41:35.280 --> 00:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with these questions of fundamental importance?

751
00:41:37.599 --> 00:41:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Right?

752
00:41:37.800 --> 00:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a fundamental question of And Steve mentioned this

753
00:41:41.079 --> 00:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>when we were talking about this case earlier. Steve said,

754
00:41:43.840 --> 00:41:45.599
<v Speaker 1>is this a non delegation doctrine case?

755
00:41:46.119 --> 00:41:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Right?

756
00:41:46.760 --> 00:41:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Is this like Scheckter and the sick Chicken case? It is,

757
00:41:50.159 --> 00:41:54.079
<v Speaker 1>but this court totally missed it, and they totally there's

758
00:41:54.440 --> 00:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and one last thing I'll shut up is the Supreme

759
00:41:57.239 --> 00:41:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Court is set in a case called Curtis right that

760
00:41:59.239 --> 00:42:02.039
<v Speaker 1>the non delegation doctrine does not apply in foreign affairs.

761
00:42:02.920 --> 00:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>This case is not mentioned in the decision at all.

762
00:42:06.199 --> 00:42:08.039
<v Speaker 1>So that's why when I was starting this whole out

763
00:42:08.079 --> 00:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>thing out the Crucia, I was like, why is this

764
00:42:09.920 --> 00:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>thing a court? Who are these people who are on

765
00:42:11.719 --> 00:42:14.119
<v Speaker 1>this court? Why do we have judges, you know, looking

766
00:42:14.159 --> 00:42:17.320
<v Speaker 1>at dolls and tariff schedules, hearing the most important constitutional

767
00:42:17.360 --> 00:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>questions of the day. Anyway, So Steve, why don't you

768
00:42:20.000 --> 00:42:22.559
<v Speaker 1>go ahead? Since you, I think are going to be

769
00:42:22.639 --> 00:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>under AEPA sanctions soon and not allowed back into the country.

770
00:42:26.280 --> 00:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But we're obviously an agent for some Norwegian Scandinavian power

771
00:42:30.360 --> 00:42:31.840
<v Speaker 1>crossing our borders at will.

772
00:42:32.280 --> 00:42:35.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going to illegally import puffins. You know you

773
00:42:35.039 --> 00:42:36.960
<v Speaker 2>can actually gets here and.

774
00:42:37.119 --> 00:42:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Actually, Steve, since you're there, Steve, since you're there, I

775
00:42:39.800 --> 00:42:42.519
<v Speaker 1>got I got a trivic question. I'm curious what is

776
00:42:42.559 --> 00:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Iceland's number one export to the United States?

777
00:42:45.760 --> 00:42:47.239
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea. Do you know what it is?

778
00:42:48.000 --> 00:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Really? No, you don't know. No, I don't know, but

779
00:42:51.360 --> 00:42:52.559
<v Speaker 1>I'll find out in a second.

780
00:42:52.599 --> 00:42:55.599
<v Speaker 5>Okase, really cool?

781
00:42:57.280 --> 00:43:00.639
<v Speaker 2>Probably fish, I don't know it's the.

782
00:43:00.119 --> 00:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Export here, You're gonna laugh. The top export is aluminum.

783
00:43:03.840 --> 00:43:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Oh that that does not surprise me.

784
00:43:06.199 --> 00:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Number two, Number two, Number two, you're right, fish file

785
00:43:09.440 --> 00:43:12.800
<v Speaker 1>at Yeah, and then number three this one. I really

786
00:43:12.800 --> 00:43:16.159
<v Speaker 1>don't get this orthopedic appliances.

787
00:43:17.159 --> 00:43:20.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't get that either. Uh. The aluminum, so you know,

788
00:43:20.480 --> 00:43:23.320
<v Speaker 2>they have tons of electricity here from geothermal and hydro.

789
00:43:23.519 --> 00:43:26.760
<v Speaker 2>It's very cheap. And because aluminum needs so much electricity

790
00:43:26.800 --> 00:43:29.599
<v Speaker 2>to smelt, this is one of the dominant producers. And

791
00:43:29.639 --> 00:43:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I've drove driven by a couple of enormous aluminum factories,

792
00:43:33.519 --> 00:43:35.360
<v Speaker 2>so that that that's boring stuff.

793
00:43:35.719 --> 00:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Look my first and I just one one one cemiment.

794
00:43:38.480 --> 00:43:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Last year fish filets did overtake aluminum. So last year

795
00:43:42.840 --> 00:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>fish filets.

796
00:43:43.519 --> 00:43:46.719
<v Speaker 5>Were which kind of fish they like?

797
00:43:46.760 --> 00:43:49.599
<v Speaker 2>Atlantic char is very popular here.

798
00:43:50.280 --> 00:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I find I find fish and effeminate food to eat,

799
00:43:53.000 --> 00:43:53.599
<v Speaker 1>so I don't eat it.

800
00:43:53.639 --> 00:43:57.760
<v Speaker 4>So I don't distinguish between the kinds of fish.

801
00:43:58.960 --> 00:44:01.519
<v Speaker 5>John, So, did you knowallops?

802
00:44:03.760 --> 00:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean yeah, the McDonald's fish fillet is not

803
00:44:06.440 --> 00:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so bad.

804
00:44:06.920 --> 00:44:10.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, see, while we're digressing, John, Uh, there are no

805
00:44:10.199 --> 00:44:14.519
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's in Iceland. What I don't we invade.

806
00:44:14.800 --> 00:44:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We're ready to invade, because we don't invade countries that

807
00:44:17.840 --> 00:44:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have McDonald's.

808
00:44:19.960 --> 00:44:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Right, and there's there's a rule number six.

809
00:44:24.039 --> 00:44:27.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that's the there are no mosquitos here either,

810
00:44:28.199 --> 00:44:29.840
<v Speaker 2>which I think is also kind of interesting.

811
00:44:30.079 --> 00:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So uh okay, So Steve, what do you think you

812
00:44:33.360 --> 00:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think you don't have to get into these decisions if

813
00:44:35.000 --> 00:44:36.079
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to. What do you think about the

814
00:44:36.360 --> 00:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>tariff fish altogether? Too?

815
00:44:38.119 --> 00:44:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I mean, I don't care for tariffs,

816
00:44:40.559 --> 00:44:43.159
<v Speaker 2>although I'm, again like other people, willing to give Trump

817
00:44:43.239 --> 00:44:45.639
<v Speaker 2>some leeway on this because it's just interesting.

818
00:44:45.280 --> 00:44:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Because he's winning on it.

819
00:44:46.639 --> 00:44:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that I think there's a chance that

820
00:44:48.440 --> 00:44:50.519
<v Speaker 2>we will never I won't get off on this general

821
00:44:50.519 --> 00:44:53.599
<v Speaker 2>field theory I have these days. But my thought is,

822
00:44:53.639 --> 00:44:56.480
<v Speaker 2>ironically this make it may make it more likely that

823
00:44:56.559 --> 00:44:59.639
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tariff powers survive, because this is such a crazy

824
00:44:59.639 --> 00:45:03.599
<v Speaker 2>opinion from this obscure court. Because I think, if you know,

825
00:45:03.639 --> 00:45:05.920
<v Speaker 2>our friend fil Hamburger's group has brought a suit through

826
00:45:06.000 --> 00:45:09.559
<v Speaker 2>regular federal court saying this is an improper delegation of power.

827
00:45:10.159 --> 00:45:13.199
<v Speaker 2>And I think if a a federal court or even

828
00:45:13.199 --> 00:45:16.559
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court said yeah, Congress can't delegate those kind

829
00:45:16.559 --> 00:45:21.000
<v Speaker 2>of broad powers of regulating foreign commerce, and I first

830
00:45:21.039 --> 00:45:24.119
<v Speaker 2>thought of immediately without getting into you know, the filings

831
00:45:24.119 --> 00:45:26.079
<v Speaker 2>and all the rest of that, or that opinion that

832
00:45:26.159 --> 00:45:28.320
<v Speaker 2>this is Curtis right and Scheckter all over again. And

833
00:45:28.400 --> 00:45:30.079
<v Speaker 2>I think it is too broad a power for a

834
00:45:30.119 --> 00:45:33.679
<v Speaker 2>president to have if we want massive tariffs or some

835
00:45:33.760 --> 00:45:35.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of schedule to try and shake things up. I

836
00:45:35.800 --> 00:45:38.559
<v Speaker 2>do think, you know, Congress, that's an Article one, section

837
00:45:38.599 --> 00:45:41.639
<v Speaker 2>eight power. It can't be handed to the president. And

838
00:45:42.199 --> 00:45:45.039
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, Congress should work harder on this,

839
00:45:45.119 --> 00:45:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and I think they they don't don't like it to

840
00:45:47.480 --> 00:45:49.199
<v Speaker 2>but I think now if it gets to a federal

841
00:45:49.239 --> 00:45:52.400
<v Speaker 2>district court, they're gonna say no, that power's fine, and

842
00:45:52.440 --> 00:45:55.519
<v Speaker 2>Trump wins, and I think they've just set themselves up

843
00:45:55.519 --> 00:45:57.079
<v Speaker 2>for a real thumping, which I like.

844
00:45:57.840 --> 00:45:59.599
<v Speaker 4>So I want to go back to something John said

845
00:45:59.639 --> 00:46:06.840
<v Speaker 4>about the court deciding that this was not an appropriate

846
00:46:06.920 --> 00:46:11.719
<v Speaker 4>exercise of executive power. For Trump to be not a delegation,

847
00:46:11.920 --> 00:46:15.519
<v Speaker 4>but for Trump to be deciding that terrorists were the

848
00:46:15.559 --> 00:46:22.320
<v Speaker 4>way to handle fentanyl and the other the other bad

849
00:46:22.360 --> 00:46:27.400
<v Speaker 4>things that happened when you have an unlimited immigration You

850
00:46:27.480 --> 00:46:29.199
<v Speaker 4>made a comment, So I was telling Steve before he

851
00:46:29.280 --> 00:46:31.480
<v Speaker 4>came on. I've been listening to some of our old

852
00:46:31.519 --> 00:46:36.719
<v Speaker 4>podcasts I'm actually listening for something specific, but you in

853
00:46:36.800 --> 00:46:41.159
<v Speaker 4>December tenth, I believe it was. You came on back

854
00:46:41.199 --> 00:46:43.800
<v Speaker 4>in the day before it was the genuine three whiskey

855
00:46:43.800 --> 00:46:45.960
<v Speaker 4>happy hour, and one of the arguments you made was

856
00:46:46.000 --> 00:46:49.199
<v Speaker 4>a very good one, was that there are lots of

857
00:46:49.280 --> 00:46:52.320
<v Speaker 4>things that the court, in this case, the Supreme Court

858
00:46:52.320 --> 00:46:55.880
<v Speaker 4>decides that they just simply do not have the expertise

859
00:46:55.960 --> 00:46:59.239
<v Speaker 4>to be deciding, and that generally speaking political issues, that's

860
00:46:59.320 --> 00:47:01.800
<v Speaker 4>not their round. They shouldn't be deciding this. And this

861
00:47:01.840 --> 00:47:06.119
<v Speaker 4>seems to me very much along the same lines as

862
00:47:06.639 --> 00:47:10.039
<v Speaker 4>what does the Trade Court, the Trade Court know about

863
00:47:10.599 --> 00:47:16.679
<v Speaker 4>the dangers of fentanel crossing the border due to illegal immigration,

864
00:47:17.280 --> 00:47:21.559
<v Speaker 4>and whether or not that is something that Trump has

865
00:47:21.719 --> 00:47:24.199
<v Speaker 4>the judgment to be able to say, yeah, I consider

866
00:47:24.239 --> 00:47:27.239
<v Speaker 4>this an emergency. That would seem to me to be

867
00:47:27.440 --> 00:47:31.719
<v Speaker 4>also an area of criticism.

868
00:47:31.119 --> 00:47:31.679
<v Speaker 5>For the court.

869
00:47:31.760 --> 00:47:34.519
<v Speaker 4>Then that's not their area of expertise.

870
00:47:34.079 --> 00:47:35.719
<v Speaker 5>Right Am? I making any sense?

871
00:47:35.800 --> 00:47:36.079
<v Speaker 4>John?

872
00:47:37.639 --> 00:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>No? I think that's the major reason why courts have

873
00:47:42.039 --> 00:47:45.039
<v Speaker 1>been so reluctant to ever interfere in foreign affairs questions,

874
00:47:46.480 --> 00:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And again you see very little respect for that in

875
00:47:49.519 --> 00:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this judicial decision. How is the court supposed to know

876
00:47:52.400 --> 00:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>what's a threat to national security and what's not. How

877
00:47:55.239 --> 00:47:57.039
<v Speaker 1>do they get well, but even the second question is

878
00:47:57.039 --> 00:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>how does a court know? This is what the court

879
00:47:58.960 --> 00:48:03.079
<v Speaker 1>really hung its it's decision on how does the court

880
00:48:03.159 --> 00:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>know what we'll deal with quote unquote the national security problem?

881
00:48:07.480 --> 00:48:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Is it tariff's I mean, does a court say, no,

882
00:48:09.639 --> 00:48:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you have to send people to the border with guns?

883
00:48:11.679 --> 00:48:14.159
<v Speaker 1>That would mean when we would believe you. So that's

884
00:48:14.159 --> 00:48:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the other question is how does a court know not

885
00:48:16.880 --> 00:48:19.519
<v Speaker 1>just what's the threat, but the proper way to deal

886
00:48:19.559 --> 00:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>with it. Let's go ahead, see start.

887
00:48:21.639 --> 00:48:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I mean, you know Alexander Hamilton and Marshall

888
00:48:24.360 --> 00:48:27.199
<v Speaker 2>would Bill snort at this opinion for just that reason.

889
00:48:27.239 --> 00:48:29.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what's the Hamilton's great lines in the Federalists

890
00:48:29.679 --> 00:48:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and elsewhere about. You know, when you have a legitimate end,

891
00:48:33.599 --> 00:48:36.719
<v Speaker 2>then the means follow to it. And so to say, well,

892
00:48:36.800 --> 00:48:39.199
<v Speaker 2>you know you can declare that fentanyls a national emergency

893
00:48:39.519 --> 00:48:41.400
<v Speaker 2>seems to me a court can't say no, it's not,

894
00:48:41.960 --> 00:48:44.519
<v Speaker 2>but they said instead was. But tariffs aren't the effective

895
00:48:44.519 --> 00:48:47.039
<v Speaker 2>means for dealing with that. That is not a decision

896
00:48:47.119 --> 00:48:49.679
<v Speaker 2>under the purview of a court. If we're going to

897
00:48:49.719 --> 00:48:53.079
<v Speaker 2>say the president can determine a national emergency, then I

898
00:48:53.159 --> 00:48:55.960
<v Speaker 2>think any means available, a lawful means to the president,

899
00:48:56.719 --> 00:48:59.000
<v Speaker 2>no court can get in the way of It's the

900
00:48:59.519 --> 00:49:03.079
<v Speaker 2>separate question, I think is whether tariffs as an economic

901
00:49:03.199 --> 00:49:07.519
<v Speaker 2>policy or as a regulation of commercial policy, can be

902
00:49:08.159 --> 00:49:10.199
<v Speaker 2>delegated to the president. And I'm not sure I think

903
00:49:10.239 --> 00:49:13.519
<v Speaker 2>about that. I mean, Curtis Right and Scheckter are kind

904
00:49:13.519 --> 00:49:17.039
<v Speaker 2>of separate questions. They both involve commerce. Curtis Right for

905
00:49:17.079 --> 00:49:18.840
<v Speaker 2>listeners who don't know it, and I always have to

906
00:49:18.880 --> 00:49:22.760
<v Speaker 2>refresh my memory. Involved an embargo that Congress enacted but

907
00:49:22.920 --> 00:49:26.800
<v Speaker 2>delegated discretion to the president about how to enforce an

908
00:49:26.880 --> 00:49:29.639
<v Speaker 2>arms embargo against Uruguay or somebody who's having a war,

909
00:49:29.800 --> 00:49:33.559
<v Speaker 2>and Curtis Right sued saying Congress can't delegate that kind

910
00:49:33.559 --> 00:49:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of commercial regulatory power to president. The court said, oh,

911
00:49:36.320 --> 00:49:39.280
<v Speaker 2>yes you can, because the president is, that famous phrase,

912
00:49:39.360 --> 00:49:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the sole organ of foreign policy. So let's take it

913
00:49:42.800 --> 00:49:45.920
<v Speaker 2>back and restate it. If tariffs are a matter of

914
00:49:46.039 --> 00:49:49.800
<v Speaker 2>foreign policy, then I think Trump's on very solid ground.

915
00:49:49.920 --> 00:49:52.800
<v Speaker 2>If it's a matter of economic policy and purely trade policy,

916
00:49:52.840 --> 00:49:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I think less so. But I think this decision as

917
00:49:55.800 --> 00:49:57.559
<v Speaker 2>bad as this has made it likely that Trump's going

918
00:49:57.639 --> 00:50:00.559
<v Speaker 2>to win the legal battle over this ago. I'm not

919
00:50:00.599 --> 00:50:01.559
<v Speaker 2>sure I would have said that.

920
00:50:02.639 --> 00:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you both before we turn to our

921
00:50:05.280 --> 00:50:07.800
<v Speaker 1>last subject, which is a special treat for listeners, which

922
00:50:07.840 --> 00:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to theory at all? Oh, we ran out

923
00:50:10.840 --> 00:50:15.239
<v Speaker 1>of time. I ask you both. Is this a winning

924
00:50:15.400 --> 00:50:19.039
<v Speaker 1>is this still? Does this still continue? I mean continue

925
00:50:19.119 --> 00:50:21.400
<v Speaker 1>might be the wrong word. Is this a winning issue

926
00:50:21.400 --> 00:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for Trump? This whole tariff war? Because one thing people

927
00:50:25.440 --> 00:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>uh so already the stories are appearing saying, oh this

928
00:50:28.559 --> 00:50:32.559
<v Speaker 1>actually this decision gives Trump a back door out of

929
00:50:32.719 --> 00:50:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a losing political battle. Because I think one thing that

930
00:50:35.400 --> 00:50:38.639
<v Speaker 1>decision would say, and I actually I think people could

931
00:50:38.639 --> 00:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>not complain about this from either side, is if you said,

932
00:50:41.800 --> 00:50:44.199
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, I allows to allows you to

933
00:50:44.239 --> 00:50:47.119
<v Speaker 1>target a single country, and so what if this all

934
00:50:47.159 --> 00:50:51.639
<v Speaker 1>turns into a tariff war with China? Right? And that?

935
00:50:52.159 --> 00:50:54.159
<v Speaker 1>And that's really something you can do in Darie. But

936
00:50:54.440 --> 00:50:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump could say, Okay, well, I'm just going to keep

937
00:50:56.840 --> 00:51:00.039
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on China high, and keep them high on the

938
00:51:00.039 --> 00:51:03.679
<v Speaker 1>European Union, and I have to drop them on everybody else,

939
00:51:03.960 --> 00:51:07.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, Senegal and the Puffins in Iceland or whatever.

940
00:51:08.159 --> 00:51:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Find theo's aren't that important?

941
00:51:10.119 --> 00:51:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Right?

942
00:51:12.920 --> 00:51:17.159
<v Speaker 4>Hasn't that been the point all along? Is if there

943
00:51:17.239 --> 00:51:21.840
<v Speaker 4>is a grand strategy behind this, it's not necessarily to

944
00:51:21.880 --> 00:51:24.800
<v Speaker 4>punish every ally and sub ally or whatever you want

945
00:51:24.840 --> 00:51:26.639
<v Speaker 4>to call it across the world, but actually to get

946
00:51:26.639 --> 00:51:31.519
<v Speaker 4>everybody on the same page regarding China. And you know,

947
00:51:31.679 --> 00:51:34.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I actually think that Trump has been doing

948
00:51:34.320 --> 00:51:37.480
<v Speaker 4>pretty well in this whole tariff thing lately, that they're

949
00:51:37.519 --> 00:51:42.320
<v Speaker 4>coming closer and closer. So the stock market fell drastically

950
00:51:42.559 --> 00:51:47.519
<v Speaker 4>on Liberation excuse me, Liberation Day, and then every time Trump,

951
00:51:47.599 --> 00:51:51.840
<v Speaker 4>even somebody from the Trump administration even talks to a

952
00:51:51.960 --> 00:51:56.320
<v Speaker 4>European ally or something like that about easing the tariffs,

953
00:51:56.519 --> 00:52:01.199
<v Speaker 4>the stock market goes crazy. So you know, it's I

954
00:52:01.320 --> 00:52:04.679
<v Speaker 4>don't see Trump ever having lost anything on this whole

955
00:52:04.719 --> 00:52:07.639
<v Speaker 4>tariff matter. I think he's going to come out on

956
00:52:07.679 --> 00:52:12.000
<v Speaker 4>top regardless. But I think his goal is China.

957
00:52:13.239 --> 00:52:16.679
<v Speaker 2>I think it's high risk but high reward. Let's sort

958
00:52:16.679 --> 00:52:17.880
<v Speaker 2>of step back a man. And by the way, I

959
00:52:17.880 --> 00:52:20.000
<v Speaker 2>think there's a parallel here with our first topic about

960
00:52:20.000 --> 00:52:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Harvard trying to play nice on trade for what the

961
00:52:22.960 --> 00:52:25.320
<v Speaker 2>last forty to fifty years hasn't worked very well. We

962
00:52:25.360 --> 00:52:27.599
<v Speaker 2>try to play nice and we make very little progress

963
00:52:27.599 --> 00:52:31.039
<v Speaker 2>on it. And so Trump is doing to the world

964
00:52:31.119 --> 00:52:33.360
<v Speaker 2>trading system what he's doing to Harvard a two by

965
00:52:33.360 --> 00:52:36.800
<v Speaker 2>four across the head. Now, I say it's high risk,

966
00:52:36.840 --> 00:52:40.159
<v Speaker 2>and it's creating a lot of volatility. Volatility is usually bad.

967
00:52:41.000 --> 00:52:43.280
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, here again, I'm going to go

968
00:52:43.320 --> 00:52:45.519
<v Speaker 2>back to one of my grand historical analogies just to

969
00:52:45.559 --> 00:52:48.519
<v Speaker 2>annoy Lucretia. You know, if you go back to Roosevelt

970
00:52:48.599 --> 00:52:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the New Deal, a lot of his measures are struck down.

971
00:52:51.039 --> 00:52:54.320
<v Speaker 2>We've already mentioned the Checkter case with a National Recovery

972
00:52:54.320 --> 00:53:01.079
<v Speaker 2>Act and other cases like that, and his policies were inconsistent, incoherent, unstable, unsound,

973
00:53:01.280 --> 00:53:03.679
<v Speaker 2>counterproductive by the way, right, I mean, I think the

974
00:53:04.000 --> 00:53:07.079
<v Speaker 2>increasing opinion of economic historians that most of the New

975
00:53:07.119 --> 00:53:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Deal lengthened the depression. On the other hand, what was

976
00:53:09.960 --> 00:53:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the result of that, The New Deal Coalition was more

977
00:53:12.400 --> 00:53:14.960
<v Speaker 2>popular than ever and was cemented in place for years.

978
00:53:15.679 --> 00:53:18.079
<v Speaker 2>That's where I'm sitting here, thinking that, you know, Trump

979
00:53:18.079 --> 00:53:20.880
<v Speaker 2>may be onto something here. It may be a roller

980
00:53:20.880 --> 00:53:22.719
<v Speaker 2>coaster ride, but at the end of all this, I

981
00:53:22.760 --> 00:53:26.400
<v Speaker 2>think he may succeed in reshaping the political economy of

982
00:53:26.400 --> 00:53:28.880
<v Speaker 2>our own country in the world. China's just one part

983
00:53:28.880 --> 00:53:30.920
<v Speaker 2>of that, I think, Lucretia, I think it's a I

984
00:53:30.960 --> 00:53:33.440
<v Speaker 2>think there's a broader game of foot here that's actually

985
00:53:33.440 --> 00:53:38.920
<v Speaker 2>more coherent, although unorthodox and unpredictable. And by the way,

986
00:53:38.920 --> 00:53:41.960
<v Speaker 2>that's why I also think to put a political point

987
00:53:42.039 --> 00:53:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that Republicans may not pay a price in the elections

988
00:53:44.519 --> 00:53:47.679
<v Speaker 2>next year, just as Roosevelt in nineteen thirty four, the

989
00:53:47.719 --> 00:53:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Democrats had big gains in the off year election, one

990
00:53:51.559 --> 00:53:54.159
<v Speaker 2>of the rare times that's ever happened, and that's because

991
00:53:54.199 --> 00:53:56.440
<v Speaker 2>people said, well, we don't know what's going on, but

992
00:53:56.480 --> 00:53:58.320
<v Speaker 2>there's something different here, and we kind of like the

993
00:53:58.320 --> 00:54:01.840
<v Speaker 2>looks of things and that vibe, a vibe shift. I

994
00:54:01.880 --> 00:54:04.000
<v Speaker 2>love the way we sail that right. More can we

995
00:54:04.000 --> 00:54:06.719
<v Speaker 2>said about all that? But we're we're getting close to

996
00:54:06.760 --> 00:54:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the end of our time.

997
00:54:07.480 --> 00:54:10.519
<v Speaker 1>I think, yes, I listen, loyal listeners, if you made

998
00:54:10.519 --> 00:54:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it to the end, I'm sorry. Our actual original game plans,

999
00:54:15.360 --> 00:54:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we were going to spend half the episode talking about

1000
00:54:18.920 --> 00:54:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve and Lucretia's view that there's no such thing as

1001
00:54:22.800 --> 00:54:26.639
<v Speaker 1>political theory, which I would love to talk about. Hopefully

1002
00:54:26.639 --> 00:54:29.239
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about next episode or one of

1003
00:54:29.239 --> 00:54:32.719
<v Speaker 1>our summer episodes, but for now we have actually hit

1004
00:54:32.800 --> 00:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>an hour just talking about beating up on Harvard and

1005
00:54:36.440 --> 00:54:38.519
<v Speaker 1>beating up on China. I mean, we could spend hours

1006
00:54:39.119 --> 00:54:42.360
<v Speaker 1>at that, or or testing Steve's knowledge of exports to

1007
00:54:42.360 --> 00:54:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States from other obscure, tiny, you know, North

1008
00:54:45.360 --> 00:54:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic countries.

1009
00:54:47.400 --> 00:54:50.440
<v Speaker 4>We didn't even talk about how the Democratic Party is

1010
00:54:50.480 --> 00:54:55.760
<v Speaker 4>going to woo you masculine men, you too, I know, yes,

1011
00:54:57.599 --> 00:55:05.119
<v Speaker 4>by this incredibly big fat Mexican lesbian, bisexual, asexual woman

1012
00:55:05.719 --> 00:55:06.880
<v Speaker 4>is leading the charge.

1013
00:55:07.480 --> 00:55:08.239
<v Speaker 5>She knows men.

1014
00:55:08.760 --> 00:55:11.000
<v Speaker 2>It's worse than that, John, I can't believe I missed

1015
00:55:11.039 --> 00:55:14.400
<v Speaker 2>the story. Save it for next week.

1016
00:55:14.480 --> 00:55:15.199
<v Speaker 5>We'll save it.

1017
00:55:15.280 --> 00:55:17.239
<v Speaker 4>But when it does, allow me to make a few

1018
00:55:18.480 --> 00:55:20.079
<v Speaker 4>Babylon be headlines.

1019
00:55:20.239 --> 00:55:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, go ahead, the creature Babylon b headlines.

1020
00:55:22.679 --> 00:55:29.119
<v Speaker 4>So California unveil's massive new escape room called California.

1021
00:55:29.519 --> 00:55:31.920
<v Speaker 5>You gotta like that one. We didn't talk about this either.

1022
00:55:32.480 --> 00:55:38.079
<v Speaker 4>Biden Macrone team up to form support group for battered

1023
00:55:38.119 --> 00:55:41.639
<v Speaker 4>and abused world leaders didn't.

1024
00:55:41.719 --> 00:55:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I did not get that until I looked up what

1025
00:55:43.760 --> 00:55:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about and I saw that video. Of

1026
00:55:46.039 --> 00:55:48.679
<v Speaker 1>his wife punching him in the face. That was unbelievable.

1027
00:55:49.119 --> 00:55:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, who knows that whole relationship, That whole

1028
00:55:55.360 --> 00:55:57.639
<v Speaker 4>thing is just as weird as it comes. I'm sorry,

1029
00:55:57.719 --> 00:56:00.119
<v Speaker 4>she's what twenty five years older.

1030
00:55:59.760 --> 00:56:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Than he is.

1031
00:56:01.119 --> 00:56:02.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's that sposed to have a

1032
00:56:02.639 --> 00:56:06.679
<v Speaker 1>good right jab Yeah, yeah, this.

1033
00:56:06.719 --> 00:56:07.239
<v Speaker 5>One's for you.

1034
00:56:07.360 --> 00:56:12.760
<v Speaker 4>John, South African president says skulls of murdered white farmers

1035
00:56:12.880 --> 00:56:15.199
<v Speaker 4>just Halloween decorations.

1036
00:56:17.320 --> 00:56:20.199
<v Speaker 1>The Christian I have been having an exchange the South

1037
00:56:20.239 --> 00:56:22.920
<v Speaker 1>African ambush. We should post it maybe, I don't know.

1038
00:56:22.920 --> 00:56:23.639
<v Speaker 1>It's been fun.

1039
00:56:24.920 --> 00:56:26.719
<v Speaker 4>If we got a little more serious about it, it

1040
00:56:26.760 --> 00:56:31.719
<v Speaker 4>might be fun. Okay, I almost done. American students unsure

1041
00:56:31.760 --> 00:56:36.599
<v Speaker 4>who to cheat off of after Trump revokes Chinese student visas.

1042
00:56:38.760 --> 00:56:40.519
<v Speaker 2>I love that's pretty good.

1043
00:56:40.639 --> 00:56:43.159
<v Speaker 4>I thought you wouldn't so I could use that since

1044
00:56:43.199 --> 00:56:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I brought it up. It's a picture of Pete Booty

1045
00:56:47.840 --> 00:56:51.480
<v Speaker 4>whatever his name is, uh with a beard, and it

1046
00:56:51.519 --> 00:56:55.000
<v Speaker 4>says DEM's unveiled plan to win back men by having

1047
00:56:55.079 --> 00:57:01.360
<v Speaker 4>gay guy grow a beard. Finally, how how Swarming House

1048
00:57:01.760 --> 00:57:05.800
<v Speaker 4>because Steve loves these how Swarming Party kicks off with

1049
00:57:06.000 --> 00:57:09.400
<v Speaker 4>land acknowledgement for the Johnson's who had lived there since

1050
00:57:09.440 --> 00:57:17.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty nineteen. Oh yeah, you have to think that one through. Sorry, Okay,

1051
00:57:17.840 --> 00:57:18.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm done.

1052
00:57:19.239 --> 00:57:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Great, Well, let me close the show with always Drink

1053
00:57:22.559 --> 00:57:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your Whiskey, Meat and Steve, what is the latest Ai

1054
00:57:26.119 --> 00:57:28.800
<v Speaker 1>hallucinogenic home Haikou?

1055
00:57:29.719 --> 00:57:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Well? I asked Ai first because of where I am

1056
00:57:32.760 --> 00:57:36.280
<v Speaker 2>for some Norse epic poetry versions, and boy did I

1057
00:57:36.320 --> 00:57:38.840
<v Speaker 2>get some great ones. So here's just one stanza of

1058
00:57:38.880 --> 00:57:41.400
<v Speaker 2>what it's going to be weeks of great material, and

1059
00:57:41.440 --> 00:57:45.519
<v Speaker 2>it goes as follows, harken ye hall dwellers, to horns

1060
00:57:45.559 --> 00:57:49.440
<v Speaker 2>filled with fire, as I sing of three warriors, bold

1061
00:57:49.480 --> 00:57:52.719
<v Speaker 2>in desire, not for blood, not for blade, nor for

1062
00:57:52.800 --> 00:57:57.079
<v Speaker 2>Odin's dread mte, but for whiskey and laughter and podcasting.

1063
00:57:57.199 --> 00:58:09.519
<v Speaker 3>Right, that was pretty that.

1064
00:58:28.159 --> 00:58:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Ricochet join the conversation
