WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.840 --> 00:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Dira, thanks for coming on men with Chess. I

2
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:04.679
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. How you doing tonight?

3
00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Doing well? Doing well? Busy, busy time, a lot of

4
00:00:07.799 --> 00:00:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the debates going on, trying to organize a lot of stuff,

5
00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to finish my second book. But I'm glad to

6
00:00:13.320 --> 00:00:14.439
<v Speaker 2>be here. I'm honored.

7
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Excellent. Yeah, I heard you have a big debate coming

8
00:00:17.800 --> 00:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>up tonight on Warski Live with an unnamed big YouTuber.

9
00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

10
00:00:23.719 --> 00:00:27.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, I haven't heard back yet from Andy. I heard

11
00:00:27.079 --> 00:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>from him a week ago and he said he would

12
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>try to get it arranged tonight. But I texted him

13
00:00:32.560 --> 00:00:35.479
<v Speaker 2>today and he hasn't responded yet. I don't know. Oh wow,

14
00:00:36.560 --> 00:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>not for sure, but keeps getting postponed, so hopefully it'll

15
00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>happen eventually.

16
00:00:40.640 --> 00:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha all right? Well, I hope they go through. I

17
00:00:43.520 --> 00:00:44.679
<v Speaker 1>look forward to listening to it.

18
00:00:45.439 --> 00:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Man, I'm excited to debate. I got a big atheist,

19
00:00:49.320 --> 00:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and I think some people have already figured out who

20
00:00:50.920 --> 00:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>it is. It's not step On, it's not Sticks, it's

21
00:00:53.840 --> 00:00:58.439
<v Speaker 2>not Jordan Peterson, so that only leaves a handful of other.

22
00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was kind of hoping you were going to

23
00:01:00.920 --> 00:01:03.119
<v Speaker 1>do a seance and debate Christopher Hitchins.

24
00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I don't think I'm not trying to be offensive

25
00:01:09.319 --> 00:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to this person, but I don't think he's not really

26
00:01:12.200 --> 00:01:16.840
<v Speaker 2>known as being an intellectual atheist. He's more of just

27
00:01:16.879 --> 00:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a vocal kind of a flamboyant more so than a

28
00:01:25.599 --> 00:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>like a PhD or something.

29
00:01:27.560 --> 00:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha? Okay, well, I look forward to it. I heard

30
00:01:30.920 --> 00:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>your debate with Nicholas Fuentes, and I thought that was

31
00:01:34.439 --> 00:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>very entertaining, and so I respect your debate skills, that's

32
00:01:38.680 --> 00:01:39.079
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

33
00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:42.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you. I've yet to lose a debate.

34
00:01:42.239 --> 00:01:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Actually, all right, Well, for those of you who don't know,

35
00:01:46.760 --> 00:01:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Jay Dyer's website is jasanalysis dot com. He's the author

36
00:01:51.359 --> 00:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of Esoteric Hollywood Sex, Cults and Symbols and Film Jay,

37
00:01:56.319 --> 00:01:57.799
<v Speaker 1>what else do you want us to know about you?

38
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:04.079
<v Speaker 2>I am the I run Jason Elis, as you said,

39
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:06.439
<v Speaker 2>but I also do a subscription service there. That's kind

40
00:02:06.439 --> 00:02:10.039
<v Speaker 2>of the main means of how people interact with my

41
00:02:10.159 --> 00:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>work is through the articles and the videos and subscribing

42
00:02:14.360 --> 00:02:17.879
<v Speaker 2>to educational content basically, so there's a lot of lectures

43
00:02:17.879 --> 00:02:23.439
<v Speaker 2>on philosophy, history, theology, geopolitics, book reviews, and I've been

44
00:02:23.479 --> 00:02:25.039
<v Speaker 2>doing that for I guess about a year and a

45
00:02:25.039 --> 00:02:28.199
<v Speaker 2>half or two years now, So that's one way to

46
00:02:28.240 --> 00:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>access my material. And I also am the co creator

47
00:02:30.919 --> 00:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>and co presenter of the television show Hollywood Decoded on

48
00:02:35.240 --> 00:02:38.879
<v Speaker 2>Guy at TV, which is accessible through Exfinity and Amazon

49
00:02:38.960 --> 00:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Prime and all that stuff.

50
00:02:40.719 --> 00:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh awesome. Yeah, I watched that episode you sent to

51
00:02:44.120 --> 00:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>me on Lord of the Rings. This fascinating stuff. I

52
00:02:46.520 --> 00:02:50.159
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really great. Kind of a cult or

53
00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:51.759
<v Speaker 1>symbolic Ciskel and Ebert.

54
00:02:51.800 --> 00:02:54.159
<v Speaker 2>I guess you could say, yeah, yeah, we try to

55
00:02:54.199 --> 00:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>say Cisco and Ebert on acid or Cisco and Neibert

56
00:02:57.439 --> 00:03:01.159
<v Speaker 2>two point zero or yeah, different ways to kind of

57
00:03:01.199 --> 00:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>update social neighbor. But thank you. I appreciate that.

58
00:03:03.479 --> 00:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no problem, Well, good stuff, man, I appreciate it. Yeah,

59
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to talk tonight about social engineering. I've heard

60
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk about this confidently in the past on Tim

61
00:03:14.080 --> 00:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Kelly's show and other places, and specifically how it's affected

62
00:03:19.240 --> 00:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Christianity in the West in the twentieth century, but also

63
00:03:22.360 --> 00:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>more broadly so, I think hating on baby boomers is

64
00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of a popular meme right now, and there seems

65
00:03:29.800 --> 00:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of something wrong with them. They're very

66
00:03:31.960 --> 00:03:35.319
<v Speaker 1>self indulgent people, and they kind of, you know, wasted

67
00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>away our economy and all these different criticisms we have,

68
00:03:38.159 --> 00:03:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of that has to do

69
00:03:40.280 --> 00:03:43.039
<v Speaker 1>with the social engineering that's gone on. So can you

70
00:03:43.080 --> 00:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>give us kind of a big picture where is this

71
00:03:46.080 --> 00:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>coming from and why is it being done?

72
00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes? And I have to take some credit for that

73
00:03:50.919 --> 00:03:54.439
<v Speaker 2>because my friend Mark and I were writing blog pieces

74
00:03:54.479 --> 00:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>about eight years ago making boomer jokes, so I might

75
00:03:59.039 --> 00:04:04.960
<v Speaker 2>me and Mark actually be the first the internet boomer posters.

76
00:04:05.199 --> 00:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, yeah, I mean it's obviously it's not anything

77
00:04:09.319 --> 00:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>as naive as to say that the problems of the

78
00:04:11.439 --> 00:04:15.159
<v Speaker 2>world are the results of a single generation. We have

79
00:04:15.240 --> 00:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>to look, i would say, at many years of practicing

80
00:04:19.519 --> 00:04:23.079
<v Speaker 2>and perfecting the technique of social engineering. So in a

81
00:04:23.199 --> 00:04:27.040
<v Speaker 2>very broad sense, this is the practice that goes all

82
00:04:27.040 --> 00:04:29.639
<v Speaker 2>the way back to Machiavelli, or you could extend it

83
00:04:29.680 --> 00:04:32.639
<v Speaker 2>back even to ancient empires. And you even see this

84
00:04:32.720 --> 00:04:35.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff in the Bible. You'll see the means

85
00:04:35.279 --> 00:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>and methods of geopolitical machination when you read the books

86
00:04:38.160 --> 00:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Kings, Chronicles, Samuel, et cetera. But in the

87
00:04:42.839 --> 00:04:46.199
<v Speaker 2>modern area era it's a little more precise because you

88
00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:53.199
<v Speaker 2>have the rise of technological process technique and scientific technique

89
00:04:53.439 --> 00:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>in how to manage mass groups of people. So I

90
00:05:00.560 --> 00:05:03.639
<v Speaker 2>would argue that most of this arises out of the

91
00:05:03.680 --> 00:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>military and wartime strategies and planning. Certainly, prior to that,

92
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:12.959
<v Speaker 2>you had bankers who were already back in the seventeen

93
00:05:13.040 --> 00:05:15.480
<v Speaker 2>hundreds eighteen hundreds of the times of the revolutions. They

94
00:05:15.519 --> 00:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>had already noticed how to fund revolutionary movements in other countries.

95
00:05:22.480 --> 00:05:25.519
<v Speaker 2>This is not solely the enterprise of Jewish bankers. It

96
00:05:25.600 --> 00:05:29.240
<v Speaker 2>is a practice of bankers in general. And you can

97
00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:32.000
<v Speaker 2>read that Carol Quigley. I have lectures on the totality

98
00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:36.439
<v Speaker 2>of his book Tragy and Hope, and he uses France

99
00:05:36.480 --> 00:05:41.040
<v Speaker 2>as one example, and he covers the rothschild the Catholic

100
00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and the Protestant interests that all were sort of vying

101
00:05:44.639 --> 00:05:49.120
<v Speaker 2>for power and control of France as one test case. Now, certainly,

102
00:05:49.120 --> 00:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>over time Jewish banking interests tended to have a lot

103
00:05:52.680 --> 00:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>of power through the Rothschilds. But we can't leave out

104
00:05:55.639 --> 00:06:00.279
<v Speaker 2>our WASP and our Vatican bank connections either, And of

105
00:06:00.279 --> 00:06:04.680
<v Speaker 2>course the Rochels have also been the official papal bankers,

106
00:06:04.680 --> 00:06:07.959
<v Speaker 2>I think since the seventeen hundred, so all of these

107
00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:14.360
<v Speaker 2>interests interconnect, and as I think Spangler put it very well,

108
00:06:14.399 --> 00:06:18.120
<v Speaker 2>there's never been a socialist revolution that wasn't funded by

109
00:06:18.160 --> 00:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>capitalists at the top. And I think that that's accurate.

110
00:06:21.600 --> 00:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>And so when we look at the French Revolution, we

111
00:06:24.519 --> 00:06:29.160
<v Speaker 2>see a kind of a combination of Protestant, Swiss and

112
00:06:29.279 --> 00:06:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Jewish banking interests and the British Empire having a vested

113
00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:36.319
<v Speaker 2>interest in removing a Catholic monarch. We see a similar

114
00:06:36.319 --> 00:06:41.600
<v Speaker 2>pattern with the funding of the Bolshek revolutions from revolution

115
00:06:41.639 --> 00:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, from the Warburgs and other New York banking houses,

116
00:06:47.000 --> 00:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>and that was essentially to reconstruct and set up a

117
00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:55.160
<v Speaker 2>social experiment in Russia, to get rid of the idea

118
00:06:55.240 --> 00:07:00.240
<v Speaker 2>of a bizarre and imperium and a confessional state. See

119
00:07:00.279 --> 00:07:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the same pattern of the removal of the Holy Roman

120
00:07:02.399 --> 00:07:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Empire in Europe and the removal of the Byzantine continuation

121
00:07:08.600 --> 00:07:13.519
<v Speaker 2>in the Romanovs, their removal by the Bolsheviks. And ultimately,

122
00:07:13.560 --> 00:07:15.680
<v Speaker 2>this I would say, is at the behest of the

123
00:07:15.720 --> 00:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>money power. It was the banking interest behind both of

124
00:07:19.720 --> 00:07:22.879
<v Speaker 2>these things. Quickly comes to the same conclusion that Friedman

125
00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of Stratford came to when they both said that the

126
00:07:27.040 --> 00:07:31.759
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century was about the Atlantis sis or Western power

127
00:07:31.839 --> 00:07:37.199
<v Speaker 2>blocks removal of their two main rivals, namely Germany, Austria,

128
00:07:37.319 --> 00:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Hungarian Empire and Russia. So that's the twentieth century in total,

129
00:07:42.079 --> 00:07:45.079
<v Speaker 2>in both of the wars and the Cold War. The

130
00:07:45.079 --> 00:07:47.000
<v Speaker 2>way you get out of these wars and the wartime

131
00:07:47.040 --> 00:07:51.639
<v Speaker 2>experience is a lot of research, research and development that

132
00:07:51.800 --> 00:07:55.240
<v Speaker 2>goes into the war machine and perfecting the techniques of

133
00:07:55.319 --> 00:08:00.319
<v Speaker 2>war quickly. For example, was a maritime war historian, also

134
00:08:00.360 --> 00:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>has other works about histories of civilization and warfare and

135
00:08:03.600 --> 00:08:12.879
<v Speaker 2>so forth like that. A second excuse me, So this

136
00:08:13.040 --> 00:08:19.360
<v Speaker 2>research and development was focused largely in the traditional sense

137
00:08:19.399 --> 00:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>of psychological warfare, but also in the implementation of new

138
00:08:22.480 --> 00:08:28.199
<v Speaker 2>techniques and strategies that would involve a lot of advanced

139
00:08:28.920 --> 00:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>UH things like cybernetics. This would come to dominate entities

140
00:08:34.000 --> 00:08:38.799
<v Speaker 2>like DARPA, which would be very instrumental in how to

141
00:08:38.879 --> 00:08:43.919
<v Speaker 2>manipulate technology to achieve the upper hand in warfare, specifically

142
00:08:43.960 --> 00:08:48.639
<v Speaker 2>things like mimicking nature, transhumanism, et cetera, et cetera, but

143
00:08:49.159 --> 00:08:51.879
<v Speaker 2>specific entities that can definitely be pointed to would be

144
00:08:52.360 --> 00:08:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the Tavistock Institute, the Frankfurt School.

145
00:08:57.639 --> 00:09:03.879
<v Speaker 3>The which by the way, both had intimate connections to

146
00:09:03.919 --> 00:09:07.240
<v Speaker 3>the CIA, the OSS, and as I was discussing hober

147
00:09:07.240 --> 00:09:10.039
<v Speaker 3>Moss in one of my lectures last night for subscribers,

148
00:09:10.600 --> 00:09:11.679
<v Speaker 3>harber Moss is one of the.

149
00:09:11.600 --> 00:09:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Premier figures of the Frankfurt School, which was the German

150
00:09:17.279 --> 00:09:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Jewish figures who had studied culture and the idea of

151
00:09:22.600 --> 00:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>culture critique, culture creation, and ultimately culture degradation. And so

152
00:09:28.519 --> 00:09:32.840
<v Speaker 2>hober Mouse, for example, talks about how you could socially

153
00:09:32.879 --> 00:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>engineer America through all of these different cultural means. And

154
00:09:38.440 --> 00:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>what most people don't know, however, is that it was

155
00:09:40.759 --> 00:09:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the OSS, the CIA, the Rockefellers and Macy Foundation money

156
00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:50.759
<v Speaker 2>that actually brought these Eastern Bloc Marxists over to help

157
00:09:50.840 --> 00:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>America fight the Great Wars. So what you get in

158
00:09:54.039 --> 00:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>America is a basically they mastered the art of culture

159
00:10:01.279 --> 00:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>creation and toxic culture. And so it's not just Jewish interests.

160
00:10:06.679 --> 00:10:09.840
<v Speaker 2>It was Rockefellers and the CIA that brought the Frankfurt

161
00:10:09.879 --> 00:10:13.519
<v Speaker 2>School people over. So there was a combination of interest.

162
00:10:13.559 --> 00:10:18.039
<v Speaker 2>There wasn't just one group. They both had a vested

163
00:10:18.080 --> 00:10:22.399
<v Speaker 2>interest and so that's how we get the sixties counterculture

164
00:10:22.399 --> 00:10:27.200
<v Speaker 2>and the boomers is from these I would say Pentagon, Military, CIA,

165
00:10:29.480 --> 00:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Frank for school characters are all on the same team.

166
00:10:32.240 --> 00:10:35.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there does seem to be a real tendency these

167
00:10:35.159 --> 00:10:39.399
<v Speaker 1>days on the internet among alt rightish type communities to

168
00:10:39.480 --> 00:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>point the finger at Jewish interests and ignore some of

169
00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:46.519
<v Speaker 1>the other interests. But there definitely was a lot of

170
00:10:46.519 --> 00:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>different groups working together for the same goal. But I'm

171
00:10:49.519 --> 00:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of curious, is there a unifying ideology for this

172
00:10:53.679 --> 00:10:56.639
<v Speaker 1>agenda or is it just about amassing power and money

173
00:10:56.799 --> 00:10:58.639
<v Speaker 1>or what have you found out?

174
00:11:00.000 --> 00:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>So I think that people who don't have a theology

175
00:11:03.519 --> 00:11:08.639
<v Speaker 2>or a belief in the transcendent, they're generally walking around

176
00:11:08.639 --> 00:11:11.039
<v Speaker 2>in a hall of mirrors trying to figure out who

177
00:11:11.480 --> 00:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the one bad guy is. But if you have a

178
00:11:15.240 --> 00:11:19.960
<v Speaker 2>conception of theology and a belief in the Bible things

179
00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:22.600
<v Speaker 2>like this, then you tend to have an overriding view

180
00:11:23.519 --> 00:11:27.720
<v Speaker 2>of history and total beginning, middle, and end, and so

181
00:11:27.840 --> 00:11:30.759
<v Speaker 2>you have a conception of good and evil, and so

182
00:11:30.879 --> 00:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>good and evil are of course spiritual forces, and they

183
00:11:34.279 --> 00:11:40.039
<v Speaker 2>are not any specific racial, ethnic socio political group or

184
00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>class that. It's not class warfare, it's not any of that.

185
00:11:43.159 --> 00:11:48.399
<v Speaker 2>There are undoubtedly powerful interests, but I see the Rockefellers

186
00:11:48.679 --> 00:11:52.919
<v Speaker 2>as far more powerful and influential and prominent in the

187
00:11:53.000 --> 00:11:57.519
<v Speaker 2>last century than Jewish interrists, for example. I mean, the

188
00:11:57.519 --> 00:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Frankfurt School would not have had any power had any

189
00:12:00.240 --> 00:12:04.600
<v Speaker 2>been brought over by the by British intelligence and the

190
00:12:04.679 --> 00:12:06.440
<v Speaker 2>CIA and the Rockefellers.

191
00:12:08.200 --> 00:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, yeah, I heard I heard you talk about on

192
00:12:10.559 --> 00:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>other shows. How in America and to some degree in Europe,

193
00:12:14.799 --> 00:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the right wing tends to always point the finger at

194
00:12:17.879 --> 00:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Marxism and communism, and this is the reason our civilization

195
00:12:21.080 --> 00:12:25.399
<v Speaker 1>has been undermined, and gender identity destroyed, and pornography pushed

196
00:12:25.440 --> 00:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>on us because some sort of KGB psyop or something.

197
00:12:28.919 --> 00:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, when you look at it, it really

198
00:12:31.720 --> 00:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like this is coming from, as you said, the

199
00:12:34.039 --> 00:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>big banks, because they really funded these revolutions, and the

200
00:12:37.240 --> 00:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller interest also pushed these things here at home. So really, well,

201
00:12:42.279 --> 00:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more to it than just Commi's.

202
00:12:44.279 --> 00:12:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, absolutely, this is very crucial, and this is one

203
00:12:47.720 --> 00:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>of the main reasons why I did the eight lectures

204
00:12:51.399 --> 00:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>on Tragy and hope is because Carol Quigley, who himself

205
00:12:54.320 --> 00:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>was a Catholic of sorts or a professing Catholic of

206
00:12:57.360 --> 00:13:00.039
<v Speaker 2>some kind, I was very much a fan of the

207
00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Western Atlanti's democratic order, and he actually thought that, you know,

208
00:13:04.840 --> 00:13:08.559
<v Speaker 2>this democratic new world order would be the best thing

209
00:13:08.600 --> 00:13:11.440
<v Speaker 2>for the world. So that's why he was a true

210
00:13:11.440 --> 00:13:15.639
<v Speaker 2>believer and a supporter, I believe, and quickly is very

211
00:13:15.679 --> 00:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>adamant in the book. This is probably what the book

212
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:21.840
<v Speaker 2>is most known for is the quotes where he says

213
00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:27.759
<v Speaker 2>that the communist Marxist, leftist socialist movements in America on

214
00:13:27.799 --> 00:13:30.519
<v Speaker 2>their own had absolutely no power and didn't weren't that

215
00:13:30.559 --> 00:13:35.200
<v Speaker 2>effect effective until they received all of this money from

216
00:13:35.919 --> 00:13:39.679
<v Speaker 2>these very wealthy elites that were both Jewish, Protestant, and

217
00:13:39.919 --> 00:13:46.879
<v Speaker 2>times even Catholic. So I mean, it's it might be

218
00:13:46.919 --> 00:13:48.799
<v Speaker 2>difficult for some people to wrap their head around that,

219
00:13:48.879 --> 00:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>but I mean it's like I said earlier, that this

220
00:13:52.039 --> 00:13:56.159
<v Speaker 2>is why you have the the Wall Street funding both

221
00:13:56.639 --> 00:13:59.279
<v Speaker 2>Nazis and the Bolsheviks. And one of the best ways

222
00:13:59.279 --> 00:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to see this is to read some of the real

223
00:14:02.879 --> 00:14:07.200
<v Speaker 2>inner circle planners of this whole system. This over writing

224
00:14:07.240 --> 00:14:11.759
<v Speaker 2>ideology that you asked about. Yes, I've been doing a

225
00:14:11.799 --> 00:14:16.559
<v Speaker 2>series called Globalist Books, and this is characters like people

226
00:14:16.559 --> 00:14:19.559
<v Speaker 2>from the CIA, like Miles Copeland, or people from the

227
00:14:19.600 --> 00:14:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Royal Society like Bertrand Russell, the Fabian Society, people like H. G. Wells,

228
00:14:25.840 --> 00:14:30.159
<v Speaker 2>and they are very people like Charles Galton, Darwin, Arthur Kessler.

229
00:14:30.240 --> 00:14:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll be doing Jacques Attalie next. These are characters who

230
00:14:34.000 --> 00:14:37.039
<v Speaker 2>are very open about the overwriting ideology. And it's not

231
00:14:39.000 --> 00:14:48.240
<v Speaker 2>solely racial. It is also materialistic. It is technocratic and dysgenic.

232
00:14:48.679 --> 00:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>And so that's what bertin Russell's. Russell says, Yes, I'm

233
00:14:51.600 --> 00:14:56.519
<v Speaker 2>very happy to see the Bolsheviks succeed in Russia because

234
00:14:56.720 --> 00:14:59.080
<v Speaker 2>he says it's a social experiment, just like all the

235
00:14:59.159 --> 00:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>other twentieth century movements and ideas. He says, there's social

236
00:15:06.480 --> 00:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>experiments to see which things work best for the technocracy.

237
00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:15.039
<v Speaker 1>So the endgame here is the development of this new

238
00:15:15.080 --> 00:15:18.279
<v Speaker 1>world order type technocracy, I guess is what you could say.

239
00:15:19.799 --> 00:15:19.840
<v Speaker 3>It.

240
00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Almost to me, looking at it seems like kind of

241
00:15:22.200 --> 00:15:25.679
<v Speaker 1>a like a dark alchemy, or something like a social alchemy.

242
00:15:25.720 --> 00:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They're melting down all these social institutions that we've had

243
00:15:29.360 --> 00:15:32.799
<v Speaker 1>in the West for centuries and trying to create an

244
00:15:32.960 --> 00:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>entirely new society that's almost an opposite image of what

245
00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was there before. Out of what they've melted down. You

246
00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:42.879
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean is good.

247
00:15:42.919 --> 00:15:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we're spot on. There is a chapter

248
00:15:47.080 --> 00:15:50.879
<v Speaker 2>in Tragic Hope that a lot of people miss because

249
00:15:50.919 --> 00:15:54.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody focuses on the sections where he talks about the

250
00:15:54.120 --> 00:15:57.759
<v Speaker 2>banker's funding the communists. There's a more important chapter about

251
00:15:57.799 --> 00:16:01.559
<v Speaker 2>the rise of the military industrial complex, and Quigley's whole

252
00:16:01.559 --> 00:16:03.679
<v Speaker 2>point in the chapter is that the new world order

253
00:16:03.799 --> 00:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>is transhumanism. It is technocracy. He says, that's the whole

254
00:16:07.240 --> 00:16:10.679
<v Speaker 2>goal of all of it. So we can argue about

255
00:16:10.799 --> 00:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>all these other things. And I'm not saying you can't

256
00:16:14.200 --> 00:16:16.679
<v Speaker 2>argue about those other things. I'm saying that the long

257
00:16:16.759 --> 00:16:24.759
<v Speaker 2>term plan is not just Israelis. It includes the Saudis,

258
00:16:24.799 --> 00:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>it includes you know, China, it includes all these other

259
00:16:28.120 --> 00:16:31.559
<v Speaker 2>interests to be a part of this global scheme. You

260
00:16:31.600 --> 00:16:35.000
<v Speaker 2>can debate to what degree, you know, atheistic Zionists or

261
00:16:35.039 --> 00:16:37.759
<v Speaker 2>whatever have a role in that, but I think that

262
00:16:37.799 --> 00:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>the the overarching plan is technocracy. It's not rooted in

263
00:16:43.399 --> 00:16:48.759
<v Speaker 2>any kind of Jewish messianic claims. You know, do you

264
00:16:48.759 --> 00:16:52.039
<v Speaker 2>see what I'm saying. Yes, yes, I don't think that

265
00:16:52.279 --> 00:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Bill Gates, David Rockefeller and these people who have you know,

266
00:16:56.600 --> 00:16:59.799
<v Speaker 2>arguably some of the they're probably some of the most

267
00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:02.480
<v Speaker 2>amplement on the planet. I don't think they're really concerned

268
00:17:02.519 --> 00:17:07.440
<v Speaker 2>about Jewish Messianism. I don't think they care about Palestine.

269
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:12.359
<v Speaker 2>So what what do they care about? Technocracy? And so

270
00:17:12.559 --> 00:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I see this the most powerful people all being on

271
00:17:16.440 --> 00:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>board with that, and that's why to be in that

272
00:17:19.559 --> 00:17:22.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of club, you have to be on board with that.

273
00:17:22.559 --> 00:17:26.640
<v Speaker 2>They don't really care about the ideology of a single

274
00:17:27.160 --> 00:17:29.119
<v Speaker 2>piece of land in the Middle East. I'm not saying

275
00:17:29.119 --> 00:17:31.759
<v Speaker 2>that that that Israel doesn't have a role in that,

276
00:17:31.880 --> 00:17:34.759
<v Speaker 2>but if you look at when Israel is being set up,

277
00:17:36.000 --> 00:17:40.400
<v Speaker 2>what the Balfour Declaration and the Royal Society and all this,

278
00:17:40.599 --> 00:17:43.440
<v Speaker 2>what they were saying at that time, they weren't really

279
00:17:43.480 --> 00:17:47.680
<v Speaker 2>concerned with Jews or Rams. They just wanted an outpost

280
00:17:48.599 --> 00:17:52.400
<v Speaker 2>uh and the Royal Society who set that up were

281
00:17:52.640 --> 00:17:57.759
<v Speaker 2>just as interested in controlling the Islamic world as they

282
00:17:57.759 --> 00:18:06.519
<v Speaker 2>were controlling the the Jewish homeland. And this is why,

283
00:18:06.559 --> 00:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>by the way, Jews got mad at British occupation, and

284
00:18:10.519 --> 00:18:12.839
<v Speaker 2>you had like the er Gone and the bombing of

285
00:18:12.880 --> 00:18:15.039
<v Speaker 2>the King David Hotel and so forth.

286
00:18:15.200 --> 00:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, and they do seem to have these technocrats an

287
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>apocalyptic profit in Ray Kurtzweil, and he published that over

288
00:18:25.480 --> 00:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago, talking about the year twenty forty five

289
00:18:28.240 --> 00:18:32.039
<v Speaker 1>and how human beings will become just totally integrated with

290
00:18:32.200 --> 00:18:36.079
<v Speaker 1>computer technology and AI and the planet Earth will basically

291
00:18:36.079 --> 00:18:38.559
<v Speaker 1>become like a technological god being.

292
00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:39.160
<v Speaker 2>You know.

293
00:18:40.160 --> 00:18:42.839
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that this is the plan for

294
00:18:42.920 --> 00:18:46.079
<v Speaker 1>all seven and a half billion people. I think the

295
00:18:46.119 --> 00:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>becoming transcendent technological god beings is for the upper class,

296
00:18:50.480 --> 00:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of us will well, I'm not sure

297
00:18:52.720 --> 00:18:54.079
<v Speaker 1>what they have planned for the rest of us. Do

298
00:18:54.079 --> 00:18:56.319
<v Speaker 1>you have anything ideas.

299
00:18:57.240 --> 00:18:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Well? Yeah, they say very clearly to get rid of

300
00:18:59.359 --> 00:19:03.839
<v Speaker 2>everybody else. So there's no debate about that. That's been that.

301
00:19:04.079 --> 00:19:06.319
<v Speaker 2>When you read all of these globalist texts, and these

302
00:19:06.359 --> 00:19:11.799
<v Speaker 2>are formative thinkers for the global plan, they always talk

303
00:19:11.880 --> 00:19:15.839
<v Speaker 2>about two or three things across the board. They never

304
00:19:15.920 --> 00:19:22.319
<v Speaker 2>disagree about Darwinian evolution and technocracy. They never disagree about

305
00:19:22.359 --> 00:19:26.119
<v Speaker 2>the need the crisis to kill off most of the planet.

306
00:19:26.799 --> 00:19:30.759
<v Speaker 2>And they never disagree about the implementation of a federation

307
00:19:30.880 --> 00:19:33.400
<v Speaker 2>of all nations into a global government. Every one of

308
00:19:33.400 --> 00:19:40.240
<v Speaker 2>them always across the board. That's their dogma. So one example,

309
00:19:40.279 --> 00:19:42.519
<v Speaker 2>another good example this is somebody like Arthur Kessler. Now

310
00:19:42.559 --> 00:19:45.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people would say, we'll see Arthur Kessler

311
00:19:45.519 --> 00:19:50.160
<v Speaker 2>in Thirteenth Tribe proves the Kazarian theory. Well, I don't

312
00:19:50.200 --> 00:19:52.920
<v Speaker 2>really put a lot of stock in the Kasar theory.

313
00:19:52.920 --> 00:19:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's kind of a silly thing. But what's

314
00:19:55.920 --> 00:20:00.079
<v Speaker 2>interesting about Kessler himself is that he stepped out of

315
00:20:01.519 --> 00:20:06.359
<v Speaker 2>caring about Jewish interests and was self consciously a Luciferian,

316
00:20:07.279 --> 00:20:11.799
<v Speaker 2>and he was part of that inner British Royal Society clique.

317
00:20:12.920 --> 00:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>And he wrote Ghosts in the Machine, and at the

318
00:20:16.039 --> 00:20:18.400
<v Speaker 2>end of Ghosts of the Machine he says what you

319
00:20:18.519 --> 00:20:21.000
<v Speaker 2>just said. He says, it is a dark alchemy what

320
00:20:21.079 --> 00:20:27.119
<v Speaker 2>we're doing to the globe, and it is to to

321
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:29.519
<v Speaker 2>he puts it the way he states, it is to

322
00:20:29.720 --> 00:20:35.400
<v Speaker 2>commander engineer, to commander evolution, to propel the species to godhood,

323
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:38.640
<v Speaker 2>basically is the whole point. So they're all agreed on transhumanism.

324
00:20:38.799 --> 00:20:42.119
<v Speaker 2>That's who came up with all those the Huxley's coined

325
00:20:42.160 --> 00:20:45.799
<v Speaker 2>the term transhumanism. That is the ultimate goal. And that's

326
00:20:45.839 --> 00:20:51.200
<v Speaker 2>also why you see a convergence of somebody like Ray Kurswall,

327
00:20:51.240 --> 00:20:54.599
<v Speaker 2>who I would assume has some kind of Jewish background,

328
00:20:55.359 --> 00:20:59.759
<v Speaker 2>and David Rockfeller if they both like the idea of transhumanism,

329
00:20:59.799 --> 00:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>because as it's an alternate version of the Gospel salvation

330
00:21:06.599 --> 00:21:09.519
<v Speaker 2>through technology, and so you could look at it like

331
00:21:10.039 --> 00:21:12.160
<v Speaker 2>who's the bad guy. Well, in the first century, who

332
00:21:12.240 --> 00:21:15.079
<v Speaker 2>was the bad guy? Well, you have the Pharisees. They

333
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:19.119
<v Speaker 2>teamed up with Caesar and hearing them. So there's a

334
00:21:19.200 --> 00:21:25.319
<v Speaker 2>combination of interests that are in rebellion against truth, against Christ,

335
00:21:25.440 --> 00:21:30.559
<v Speaker 2>against the logos. And I don't believe that they actually

336
00:21:30.880 --> 00:21:36.519
<v Speaker 2>will achieve technological godhood. I think that that's partly a lie,

337
00:21:36.720 --> 00:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>a myth that they are projecting. And certainly there will

338
00:21:41.000 --> 00:21:47.160
<v Speaker 2>be technological enhancements, probably extended life longevity, you know, I'm

339
00:21:47.200 --> 00:21:50.839
<v Speaker 2>sure there will be all kinds of new miraculous nanotech

340
00:21:51.319 --> 00:21:54.839
<v Speaker 2>health discoveries. But to think that this is going to

341
00:21:55.160 --> 00:21:59.599
<v Speaker 2>give you immortality, I think would just be utter stupidity

342
00:21:59.640 --> 00:22:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and being completely naive. Yeah, No, why would the people

343
00:22:03.200 --> 00:22:04.920
<v Speaker 2>why would the people who say that they want your

344
00:22:05.000 --> 00:22:07.960
<v Speaker 2>dad give you immortality. That's other stupid.

345
00:22:08.359 --> 00:22:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I definitely think it's an overreach. That whole

346
00:22:13.000 --> 00:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>what is it called the Ray kurtzwild theory, I forget,

347
00:22:15.799 --> 00:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it'll get that far to a

348
00:22:18.359 --> 00:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>technological godhood. But you know all this technology singularity, Yes, yes,

349
00:22:24.119 --> 00:22:26.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a positive thing in and of itself,

350
00:22:26.839 --> 00:22:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and we just need to reconvert the culture and baptize it.

351
00:22:32.160 --> 00:22:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. I was, I forget which talk or stream or something,

352
00:22:36.400 --> 00:22:39.119
<v Speaker 2>but I was saying that we have the template, you know,

353
00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:43.759
<v Speaker 2>already laid down as to how to build societies, how

354
00:22:43.839 --> 00:22:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to build cultures, and how to have real progress. And

355
00:22:48.079 --> 00:22:51.400
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that I always cut at the

356
00:22:51.519 --> 00:22:56.039
<v Speaker 2>root of is that most Jews, and most alt right,

357
00:22:56.279 --> 00:23:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and most atheists and most Pagans, can you think of

358
00:23:02.799 --> 00:23:03.880
<v Speaker 2>one thing they all have in common?

359
00:23:06.359 --> 00:23:13.039
<v Speaker 1>No, what was that? Darwinism? Darwinism.

360
00:23:13.839 --> 00:23:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I'm a big opponent of Darwinism and have

361
00:23:16.640 --> 00:23:18.720
<v Speaker 2>been for a long time. I'm always trying to find

362
00:23:18.759 --> 00:23:21.640
<v Speaker 2>somebody to debate it. Yeah, and I've written, I've written

363
00:23:21.680 --> 00:23:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a whole ton of articles against Darwinism and Darwinism factors

364
00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:31.400
<v Speaker 2>directly into transhumanism. Darwinism, I believe, is a from I

365
00:23:31.519 --> 00:23:34.400
<v Speaker 2>come at it from the position of a philosopher, that's

366
00:23:34.440 --> 00:23:38.039
<v Speaker 2>my training, and so I critique it from a philosophical standpoint,

367
00:23:38.039 --> 00:23:39.799
<v Speaker 2>which is not to say that I never I don't

368
00:23:39.839 --> 00:23:43.880
<v Speaker 2>ever engage in the scientific discourse. I do, but I'm

369
00:23:43.920 --> 00:23:47.720
<v Speaker 2>mainly concerned with higher order questions, and philosophy is a

370
00:23:47.720 --> 00:23:51.079
<v Speaker 2>little bit higher order than empirical science. So I believe

371
00:23:51.119 --> 00:23:56.839
<v Speaker 2>that Darwinism is a mythology, that right that originally comes

372
00:23:56.920 --> 00:24:01.680
<v Speaker 2>from ancient Hinduism. And so the the people want to

373
00:24:01.720 --> 00:24:05.680
<v Speaker 2>make a connection between like scientism and Kabbalism, Yeah, you

374
00:24:05.720 --> 00:24:10.680
<v Speaker 2>can find that connection, because ultimately these these positions are

375
00:24:10.720 --> 00:24:15.480
<v Speaker 2>really the same as like ancient a perennial tradition style

376
00:24:15.759 --> 00:24:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Hindu stuff. So you were once a rock and then

377
00:24:19.440 --> 00:24:23.440
<v Speaker 2>you you know you, or you were once a goo

378
00:24:23.599 --> 00:24:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and then you evolved into you know, to something else.

379
00:24:26.559 --> 00:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>And so the transmutation of species, I think, which is

380
00:24:29.559 --> 00:24:35.119
<v Speaker 2>completely ridiculous, is really a very powerful presupposition that most

381
00:24:35.160 --> 00:24:40.160
<v Speaker 2>people aren't willing to criticize or question. So that's why

382
00:24:40.160 --> 00:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that the alt right is doomed to fail

383
00:24:43.440 --> 00:24:45.839
<v Speaker 2>as well as all these movements because they're all predicated

384
00:24:45.960 --> 00:24:50.079
<v Speaker 2>on a false grand mythology, which is basically you know,

385
00:24:50.079 --> 00:24:52.440
<v Speaker 2>if you read the ancient Greek myths, it's the same idea.

386
00:24:52.519 --> 00:24:57.559
<v Speaker 2>It's like lightning. The gods struck the ground of lightning,

387
00:24:57.759 --> 00:25:00.119
<v Speaker 2>and you know, out of it comes man. I mean,

388
00:25:00.200 --> 00:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>that's like exactly what the theory of the produce the

389
00:25:04.279 --> 00:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>protest the rise of the protozoa was.

390
00:25:06.079 --> 00:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So so you're telling me, Jay that you don't believe

391
00:25:09.640 --> 00:25:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that all the complexity of life evolved from a single

392
00:25:12.680 --> 00:25:15.519
<v Speaker 1>cell organism. You don't think this is a scientific effect.

393
00:25:16.440 --> 00:25:21.160
<v Speaker 2>No, because as I understand, DNA only prints what it

394
00:25:21.359 --> 00:25:24.680
<v Speaker 2>has within that species code. So a whale is never

395
00:25:24.759 --> 00:25:28.599
<v Speaker 2>going to print bear code. A tree is never going

396
00:25:28.680 --> 00:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>to print whale code. You can have mutations and adaptations,

397
00:25:33.519 --> 00:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>but the new coding that is expressed to show those

398
00:25:40.279 --> 00:25:44.920
<v Speaker 2>mutations or adaptations is only what is already present in

399
00:25:45.400 --> 00:25:49.559
<v Speaker 2>the strand, and it's either on or off. So the

400
00:25:49.640 --> 00:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>whale never has bear code.

401
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I tend to agree with you. I've been skeptical

402
00:25:55.440 --> 00:25:59.599
<v Speaker 1>of evolution in Darwinism my entire adult life, being raised

403
00:25:59.599 --> 00:26:02.599
<v Speaker 1>in a very conservative evangelical home. That's sort of part

404
00:26:02.640 --> 00:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of the course, but it's really when you look at

405
00:26:05.960 --> 00:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it and take yourself out of the conditioning we've been

406
00:26:09.240 --> 00:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>put through the social engineering we've been talking about. It's

407
00:26:12.039 --> 00:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>such an absurd theory and there's no way you could

408
00:26:14.960 --> 00:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>empirically prove it. You'd have to go back in time

409
00:26:18.640 --> 00:26:22.599
<v Speaker 1>billions of years and then observe the species evolving and

410
00:26:22.759 --> 00:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of billions of years of immortality to

411
00:26:25.799 --> 00:26:28.839
<v Speaker 1>even prove that it happens. So it's it's just an

412
00:26:28.880 --> 00:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>absurd thing on its face, And it's funny because of

413
00:26:31.720 --> 00:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the reaction you get when you say you don't believe it.

414
00:26:34.279 --> 00:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>They treat you like you're the absurd person. So it's

415
00:26:37.480 --> 00:26:39.039
<v Speaker 1>classic projection, I'd say.

416
00:26:39.640 --> 00:26:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, And there's many reasons for this. But most people

417
00:26:42.279 --> 00:26:45.839
<v Speaker 2>who for example, go to university and study biology or

418
00:26:45.920 --> 00:26:49.119
<v Speaker 2>they study astronomy. And when I was doing my undergrad

419
00:26:49.119 --> 00:26:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean I had to take science classes. I took

420
00:26:51.200 --> 00:26:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of plus or science classes. I interacted with

421
00:26:53.920 --> 00:26:57.720
<v Speaker 2>all of these different professors and people with you know,

422
00:26:57.799 --> 00:27:01.319
<v Speaker 2>getting a biochemistry degree or whatever. I did this for

423
00:27:01.440 --> 00:27:03.839
<v Speaker 2>many years and then I did grad school. I'm not

424
00:27:04.079 --> 00:27:10.559
<v Speaker 2>unfamiliar with what is taught and how people defend their positions.

425
00:27:10.599 --> 00:27:12.319
<v Speaker 2>And what I did when I was in my undergrad

426
00:27:12.400 --> 00:27:17.119
<v Speaker 2>was actually pretty consistently debate professors. That didn't make me

427
00:27:17.279 --> 00:27:21.200
<v Speaker 2>very popular with the professors, but I did it and

428
00:27:21.559 --> 00:27:25.119
<v Speaker 2>it is what it is. And so for most of

429
00:27:25.200 --> 00:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the science professors that I had. For example, there was

430
00:27:29.359 --> 00:27:33.119
<v Speaker 2>one guy who was an astronomy teacher and I had

431
00:27:33.160 --> 00:27:35.799
<v Speaker 2>a debate with him, and he actually suggested that I

432
00:27:36.079 --> 00:27:39.920
<v Speaker 2>debate head of the department. So I went to the

433
00:27:40.200 --> 00:27:43.559
<v Speaker 2>head of I can't remember. He might have been the

434
00:27:43.599 --> 00:27:45.279
<v Speaker 2>physics head. It might have been a different guy, but

435
00:27:46.000 --> 00:27:48.599
<v Speaker 2>I think he was a physics guy. So I had

436
00:27:48.599 --> 00:27:50.680
<v Speaker 2>a long, long, long debate with the head of the

437
00:27:50.720 --> 00:27:56.279
<v Speaker 2>physics department. And what I came to realize this is

438
00:27:56.359 --> 00:27:57.759
<v Speaker 2>I was like twenty three at the time, so I

439
00:27:57.920 --> 00:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>wasn't super versed and everything, but I did understand basic

440
00:28:01.960 --> 00:28:05.480
<v Speaker 2>apologetics and I understood basic presuppositional apologetics at the time,

441
00:28:05.599 --> 00:28:10.440
<v Speaker 2>so I was fairly well armed. And I realized that

442
00:28:11.200 --> 00:28:15.119
<v Speaker 2>that education is compartmentalized, and the people who study physics,

443
00:28:15.559 --> 00:28:18.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't know philosophy. That doesn't mean that every person

444
00:28:18.680 --> 00:28:22.119
<v Speaker 2>who studies physics doesn't know philosophy, but on the whole.

445
00:28:23.200 --> 00:28:27.079
<v Speaker 2>It's very compartmentalized. If you are getting a PhD in physics,

446
00:28:27.160 --> 00:28:29.519
<v Speaker 2>you might have only had one or two philosophy classes.

447
00:28:29.640 --> 00:28:32.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's not required. You might have had logic

448
00:28:32.920 --> 00:28:35.319
<v Speaker 2>and you maybe if you wanted to, you might have

449
00:28:35.400 --> 00:28:38.079
<v Speaker 2>taken something like, you know, philosophy one on one or something.

450
00:28:38.920 --> 00:28:43.039
<v Speaker 2>So most of them don't study the whole. Other discipline

451
00:28:43.079 --> 00:28:45.519
<v Speaker 2>called philosophy of science, which is very famous, has a

452
00:28:45.559 --> 00:28:50.319
<v Speaker 2>lot of great intellectual giants who have written on the topics,

453
00:28:50.480 --> 00:28:54.200
<v Speaker 2>people like Michael Polani, and he's a famous scholar who

454
00:28:54.720 --> 00:29:01.319
<v Speaker 2>has critiqued the positivist empiricist, a tradition of of the

455
00:29:01.400 --> 00:29:04.200
<v Speaker 2>physical sciences and philosophy science which is a dead end.

456
00:29:05.200 --> 00:29:07.640
<v Speaker 2>But you will be very hard pressed to find many

457
00:29:08.359 --> 00:29:12.720
<v Speaker 2>people who get quote hard science degrees who don't grasp this. Now,

458
00:29:12.960 --> 00:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>this is another interesting point that should be made, is

459
00:29:15.240 --> 00:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>that there's a distinct. I believe there's a distinction between

460
00:29:19.039 --> 00:29:22.839
<v Speaker 2>life sciences and hard sciences, and so things like biology.

461
00:29:23.200 --> 00:29:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that they can't involve aspects of heart science,

462
00:29:26.680 --> 00:29:29.839
<v Speaker 2>but when they start talking about the theory of origins,

463
00:29:30.359 --> 00:29:34.559
<v Speaker 2>it's very speculative. Okay, if you're an engineer, which is

464
00:29:34.720 --> 00:29:38.920
<v Speaker 2>part of science, engineering and science, computer science, mathematics. Right,

465
00:29:39.599 --> 00:29:45.640
<v Speaker 2>you're engaging in something that's more I would say, directly

466
00:29:46.000 --> 00:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>directly relevant to something like understanding DNA, because you understand

467
00:29:50.839 --> 00:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>design and you understand architecture, right, And so a lot

468
00:29:56.480 --> 00:30:00.440
<v Speaker 2>of times when propagandas for Darwinism start to talking about

469
00:30:00.599 --> 00:30:02.480
<v Speaker 2>science is all on our side, science is all on

470
00:30:02.559 --> 00:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>our side, that's not actually true because there are plenty

471
00:30:05.240 --> 00:30:10.519
<v Speaker 2>of engineers who are theists and who recognize all of

472
00:30:10.559 --> 00:30:13.400
<v Speaker 2>these same principles and they're part of science. So it's

473
00:30:13.440 --> 00:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>just kind of a game they play where they kind

474
00:30:15.240 --> 00:30:18.599
<v Speaker 2>of move the markers around and they move the the

475
00:30:19.319 --> 00:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>delineators around to decide who's part of science and who isn't.

476
00:30:22.720 --> 00:30:25.680
<v Speaker 2>And it's all relative depending on the debate at hand.

477
00:30:25.839 --> 00:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>So so they just don't know what they're talking about.

478
00:30:29.680 --> 00:30:31.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I rambled there for like five minutes, to

479
00:30:31.920 --> 00:30:34.640
<v Speaker 2>forgive me, But at the end of the day, they

480
00:30:34.720 --> 00:30:39.119
<v Speaker 2>don't know the basic philosophical questions like you know, what

481
00:30:39.240 --> 00:30:42.119
<v Speaker 2>about the principle of induction? You know, you ask most

482
00:30:42.599 --> 00:30:45.720
<v Speaker 2>philosophers and I mean scientists, unless they've studied a little

483
00:30:45.720 --> 00:30:49.079
<v Speaker 2>philosophy that they're kind of like, what what about this

484
00:30:49.240 --> 00:30:51.319
<v Speaker 2>idea of why is that? Do you believe the future

485
00:30:51.359 --> 00:30:54.039
<v Speaker 2>will be like the past? Oh? Well, that's just kind

486
00:30:54.079 --> 00:30:56.799
<v Speaker 2>of a basic assumption, and we don't worry with those

487
00:30:56.880 --> 00:30:59.319
<v Speaker 2>questions anymore. So they just they will arbitrarily kind of

488
00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:03.000
<v Speaker 2>just throw out the things that they don't consider relevant.

489
00:31:03.519 --> 00:31:07.720
<v Speaker 2>But there's no clear scientific test for what things are

490
00:31:07.880 --> 00:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>objectively relevant or not. It's their subjective taste. And this

491
00:31:12.599 --> 00:31:14.720
<v Speaker 2>is why you have people like Nildagras Tyson will say

492
00:31:14.960 --> 00:31:18.200
<v Speaker 2>a philosophy and philosophy of science don't matter anymore. Well,

493
00:31:18.240 --> 00:31:20.440
<v Speaker 2>they don't matter because he can't answer those questions and

494
00:31:20.519 --> 00:31:21.799
<v Speaker 2>he gets mad when people ask them.

495
00:31:22.160 --> 00:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, I noticed that, especially in the New Avius community,

496
00:31:26.559 --> 00:31:30.759
<v Speaker 1>there was a big attack on philosophy in general, classical

497
00:31:30.799 --> 00:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>philosophy because they were bad at it basically, right.

498
00:31:35.279 --> 00:31:37.240
<v Speaker 2>All they do is, you know, it's funny. They will

499
00:31:37.279 --> 00:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>criticize theists, and I will give them some credit because

500
00:31:40.759 --> 00:31:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of theists make bad arguments and they rehash

501
00:31:44.079 --> 00:31:47.359
<v Speaker 2>bad classical proofs for God, which I don't think are

502
00:31:47.480 --> 00:31:49.599
<v Speaker 2>very good. I think the need to be kind of

503
00:31:49.640 --> 00:31:53.079
<v Speaker 2>restated because the questions and needs of our time are

504
00:31:53.160 --> 00:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>not the same questions and needs of you know, the

505
00:31:55.519 --> 00:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>year thirteen hundred. So so they'll they'll throw this this

506
00:32:02.880 --> 00:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>monkey poo at the theists quite often and say how

507
00:32:08.039 --> 00:32:10.640
<v Speaker 2>bad their arguments are and that they just rehash old,

508
00:32:10.799 --> 00:32:14.880
<v Speaker 2>debunked arguments. But guess what, all these new atheists are

509
00:32:14.960 --> 00:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>just rehashing people like David Hume and people from the

510
00:32:19.759 --> 00:32:23.759
<v Speaker 2>French Revolution. I mean they're not they're not doing anything

511
00:32:23.799 --> 00:32:27.279
<v Speaker 2>spectacular either, but rehashing you know, Enlightenment eraror arguments. So

512
00:32:29.160 --> 00:32:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that the discourse is pretty low level and

513
00:32:32.559 --> 00:32:35.519
<v Speaker 2>pretty pretty lame and pretty weak, and it's kind of

514
00:32:35.559 --> 00:32:37.319
<v Speaker 2>that way by design. I mean a lot of these

515
00:32:37.359 --> 00:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>people are really just kind of pop figures propped up

516
00:32:40.519 --> 00:32:45.039
<v Speaker 2>like Bill Nye. You know, Bill NIC's changed. Bill NY's

517
00:32:45.119 --> 00:32:48.319
<v Speaker 2>been caught contradicting himself multiple times. Somebody put together a

518
00:32:48.359 --> 00:32:52.839
<v Speaker 2>great video of Richard Dawkins totally contradicting himself within a

519
00:32:52.920 --> 00:32:55.359
<v Speaker 2>few years about junk DNA, where he's like, junk DNA

520
00:32:55.480 --> 00:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>prooves evolution, and then like a few years later, when

521
00:32:58.680 --> 00:33:01.440
<v Speaker 2>suddenly they've decided maybe there's not junk DNA, he's like,

522
00:33:01.759 --> 00:33:05.079
<v Speaker 2>I've never said junk DNA proof's evolution. Junk. The fact

523
00:33:05.119 --> 00:33:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that there's no junk DNA prooves evolution.

524
00:33:10.680 --> 00:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, these guys are definitely propped up in one

525
00:33:13.200 --> 00:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>way or another. I mean, for the public consciousness, science

526
00:33:17.079 --> 00:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is not you know, the scientific method and empiricism. It's

527
00:33:21.160 --> 00:33:23.559
<v Speaker 1>it's just a way to drive the narrative in a

528
00:33:23.640 --> 00:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>certain direction, in favor of Darwinism, in favor of transgenderism,

529
00:33:27.839 --> 00:33:31.119
<v Speaker 1>all these social issues. It's just another form of social engineering.

530
00:33:31.279 --> 00:33:34.039
<v Speaker 1>So that's why you have all these scandals that the

531
00:33:34.359 --> 00:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>different scientific journals. People will contribute studies that have bad

532
00:33:39.759 --> 00:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>evidence in it, specifically to see if he can get published,

533
00:33:42.960 --> 00:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and it does because it supports a certain political narrative

534
00:33:45.920 --> 00:33:46.559
<v Speaker 1>they want to push.

535
00:33:47.440 --> 00:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a whole bunch of articles that you can

536
00:33:49.200 --> 00:33:51.440
<v Speaker 2>pull up about fraud and science for aud in the

537
00:33:51.480 --> 00:33:55.839
<v Speaker 2>peer review process. There's no actual peer review way to

538
00:33:56.200 --> 00:33:59.599
<v Speaker 2>prove the peer of view process. I'm serious, And there

539
00:33:59.720 --> 00:34:02.279
<v Speaker 2>been There have been countless mainstream articles on this. The

540
00:34:02.319 --> 00:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>most famous of which people can look up is the

541
00:34:05.799 --> 00:34:10.159
<v Speaker 2>Lancet the Lancet Journal, which I've sourced this so many times,

542
00:34:10.400 --> 00:34:12.679
<v Speaker 2>I need to just archive this on my website actually,

543
00:34:12.719 --> 00:34:17.239
<v Speaker 2>but everybody should read the very brief discussion from the

544
00:34:17.360 --> 00:34:24.039
<v Speaker 2>Lancet about where they were discussing about fifty percent of

545
00:34:24.679 --> 00:34:27.039
<v Speaker 2>most peer view papers are fake.

546
00:34:27.920 --> 00:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow.

547
00:34:28.800 --> 00:34:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the Lancet is, of course Oxford's premiere, longest

548
00:34:32.440 --> 00:34:38.559
<v Speaker 2>running medical science journal that was published I think two

549
00:34:38.719 --> 00:34:41.800
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and you can still pull it up. The

550
00:34:41.840 --> 00:34:44.880
<v Speaker 2>PDO of the actual file is still available. At least

551
00:34:44.880 --> 00:34:48.760
<v Speaker 2>it was fairly recently. So, and this is not anything

552
00:34:48.880 --> 00:34:51.920
<v Speaker 2>surprising or new. Now people will hear this and they'll say, oh,

553
00:34:52.000 --> 00:34:53.199
<v Speaker 2>you're a science denier.

554
00:34:53.360 --> 00:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Not at all.

555
00:34:53.840 --> 00:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in fact, as I said, you know, a

556
00:34:56.519 --> 00:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of my graduate work was philosopher science. Phenomenology was

557
00:35:02.599 --> 00:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>the questions of analytics and how analytical philosophy ties into

558
00:35:08.440 --> 00:35:11.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the hard realities of the here and the now. Right.

559
00:35:11.880 --> 00:35:15.639
<v Speaker 2>This is kind of ancient philosophical questions just rehashed in modernity.

560
00:35:16.119 --> 00:35:19.239
<v Speaker 2>So I'm very pro science. I think science is a

561
00:35:19.480 --> 00:35:22.039
<v Speaker 2>wonderful tool for understanding the natural world, and anybody who

562
00:35:22.039 --> 00:35:26.519
<v Speaker 2>would deny that is a complete idiot. But the science

563
00:35:26.559 --> 00:35:32.440
<v Speaker 2>as a tool is a giant light year leap from scientism,

564
00:35:32.480 --> 00:35:36.760
<v Speaker 2>which is a grand narrative explanation. Yeah, no tool can

565
00:35:36.840 --> 00:35:41.280
<v Speaker 2>ever be a grand narrative if you have a monkey

566
00:35:41.320 --> 00:35:45.719
<v Speaker 2>wrench and a giant. You know, if you have a

567
00:35:45.800 --> 00:35:50.760
<v Speaker 2>monkey wrench, the monkey wrench doesn't tell you how the

568
00:35:50.840 --> 00:35:54.800
<v Speaker 2>car is built, right, I mean, a wrench is a tool.

569
00:35:54.920 --> 00:35:57.000
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't give you an explanation. So in the same way,

570
00:35:57.079 --> 00:36:00.239
<v Speaker 2>the scientific method is a tool for understanding the natural world,

571
00:36:00.280 --> 00:36:03.400
<v Speaker 2>but by its very nature, it's not designed to ask

572
00:36:03.679 --> 00:36:08.159
<v Speaker 2>questions that by definition would come outside the scope of

573
00:36:08.320 --> 00:36:14.039
<v Speaker 2>empirical investigation. So, for example, mathematical concepts, logical laws, these

574
00:36:14.159 --> 00:36:18.599
<v Speaker 2>by definition are abstract and so they are not material.

575
00:36:18.800 --> 00:36:23.360
<v Speaker 2>So when the so called scientists or scientism proponent propaganda

576
00:36:23.440 --> 00:36:26.920
<v Speaker 2>says I don't believe in anything immaterial abstract that I

577
00:36:27.000 --> 00:36:31.360
<v Speaker 2>can't see, he's not being honest because he will absolutely

578
00:36:31.480 --> 00:36:36.840
<v Speaker 2>utilize mathematical concepts, principles, ideas like law, ideas like rights,

579
00:36:37.840 --> 00:36:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and those cannot be empirically demonstrated or proven.

580
00:36:42.320 --> 00:36:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Very good, Well, let's shift topic back to the I

581
00:36:46.199 --> 00:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>want to talk a little bit more about the baby

582
00:36:47.920 --> 00:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>boomers and kind of what specifically was done to them

583
00:36:50.800 --> 00:36:54.599
<v Speaker 1>as a part of this social engineering agenda. You're probably

584
00:36:54.639 --> 00:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>familiar with Terrence McKenna, definitely a spoop mouthpiece well, maybe

585
00:36:59.480 --> 00:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely talking about the Archaic Revival. During his career, it

586
00:37:05.039 --> 00:37:08.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of seems like there was an agenda to dismantle

587
00:37:08.800 --> 00:37:13.599
<v Speaker 1>the industrialized civilization that had been created in America and

588
00:37:13.800 --> 00:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of get people to go back to the land

589
00:37:16.039 --> 00:37:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and start living in like small huts and communes and

590
00:37:19.840 --> 00:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of go back to an almost feudal lifestyle. Would

591
00:37:24.079 --> 00:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you agree with that or I would absolutely agree with that.

592
00:37:27.880 --> 00:37:30.679
<v Speaker 2>And I just put up a documentary at my website

593
00:37:30.719 --> 00:37:33.880
<v Speaker 2>called the Net which is about mk Ultra and the

594
00:37:34.000 --> 00:37:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Unibomber and the rise of the Internet. And this is

595
00:37:36.599 --> 00:37:39.639
<v Speaker 2>an old, somewhat famous documentary from I think two thousand,

596
00:37:39.639 --> 00:37:42.360
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and three somewhere in there, and this is

597
00:37:42.559 --> 00:37:46.159
<v Speaker 2>an interview with a lot of people who were formative

598
00:37:46.280 --> 00:37:48.320
<v Speaker 2>in the rise of the Internet. And this is you know,

599
00:37:48.400 --> 00:37:52.440
<v Speaker 2>people at DARPA, people in MIT military, kind of gone

600
00:37:52.519 --> 00:37:59.760
<v Speaker 2>level people, and they are discussing the simultaneous rise of

601
00:38:00.599 --> 00:38:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the concept of the internet in the sixties with the

602
00:38:04.599 --> 00:38:08.320
<v Speaker 2>cultural revolution. And so what I'm getting at is that

603
00:38:09.679 --> 00:38:11.840
<v Speaker 2>the deeper that you dive into this question, when you

604
00:38:11.960 --> 00:38:14.079
<v Speaker 2>read the works of Dave McGowan, you find out that

605
00:38:14.360 --> 00:38:19.039
<v Speaker 2>absolutely the counter culture and this would include the archaic

606
00:38:19.159 --> 00:38:24.199
<v Speaker 2>revival primitivism and this idea, but all the hippie ideas

607
00:38:24.480 --> 00:38:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and Terence McKennon obviously as part of that giant social

608
00:38:29.559 --> 00:38:32.719
<v Speaker 2>engineering project. And I don't think there's any question about

609
00:38:32.760 --> 00:38:34.760
<v Speaker 2>that anymore. The deeper that you dive into, a lot

610
00:38:34.800 --> 00:38:37.239
<v Speaker 2>of people with boomers especially have not heard this, are

611
00:38:37.280 --> 00:38:40.119
<v Speaker 2>not familiar with it, and so they kind of saw

612
00:38:40.159 --> 00:38:45.480
<v Speaker 2>themselves as positioned in this period of Cold War where

613
00:38:45.639 --> 00:38:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Russians are all the bad guys and it's you know,

614
00:38:47.880 --> 00:38:51.599
<v Speaker 2>the evil empire, and the only way out of that

615
00:38:51.920 --> 00:38:57.000
<v Speaker 2>is to make sure that Americanism and pepsi and coke

616
00:38:57.199 --> 00:39:00.960
<v Speaker 2>can be spread to the whole world. Right taneous with

617
00:39:01.159 --> 00:39:05.039
<v Speaker 2>that is what you're saying. The de industrialization is absolutely

618
00:39:05.239 --> 00:39:08.119
<v Speaker 2>aided by the rise of the hippie culture. And the

619
00:39:08.199 --> 00:39:10.320
<v Speaker 2>same people at the Royal Society who back in the

620
00:39:10.519 --> 00:39:13.880
<v Speaker 2>thirties we're talking about the de industrialization of the West

621
00:39:13.960 --> 00:39:18.199
<v Speaker 2>and the rise of China as an industrial powerhouse for

622
00:39:18.280 --> 00:39:21.440
<v Speaker 2>the globe, they were also the people who were saying

623
00:39:21.639 --> 00:39:27.320
<v Speaker 2>we can socially engineer the West with giant LSD mushroom.

624
00:39:27.599 --> 00:39:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Terence McKenna, Timothy Leary, stooges.

625
00:39:31.280 --> 00:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is back in the thirties, right.

626
00:39:34.079 --> 00:39:37.800
<v Speaker 2>So in the thirties you have Russell saying and I

627
00:39:37.880 --> 00:39:41.280
<v Speaker 2>did two talks on virtin Russell's books Scientific Outlook and

628
00:39:41.840 --> 00:39:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Impact of Science on Society. And in both of those

629
00:39:44.000 --> 00:39:52.039
<v Speaker 2>books he discusses the geopolitical plans in how the West

630
00:39:52.079 --> 00:39:55.599
<v Speaker 2>will attempt to be destroyed and the industrialized and the

631
00:39:55.679 --> 00:39:58.960
<v Speaker 2>rise of the East, and he even mentions things like

632
00:39:59.519 --> 00:40:03.840
<v Speaker 2>mass and ized migration. At the same time, another one

633
00:40:03.880 --> 00:40:08.599
<v Speaker 2>of his cohorts in this conspiracy, Alice Huxley, was instrumental

634
00:40:08.760 --> 00:40:15.079
<v Speaker 2>in Tavistock and uh, the British version of the the

635
00:40:15.199 --> 00:40:19.840
<v Speaker 2>rise of LSD sandas pharmaceuticals. And that's how the CIA

636
00:40:19.960 --> 00:40:23.800
<v Speaker 2>would because the CIA is working in tandem with British intelligence. Uh.

637
00:40:23.960 --> 00:40:27.119
<v Speaker 2>And so they are the ones who are coordinated with

638
00:40:27.400 --> 00:40:32.079
<v Speaker 2>Tavistock to you know, share research and so forth. Uh.

639
00:40:32.199 --> 00:40:35.280
<v Speaker 2>And they realized that, yes, everything that the Huxley is

640
00:40:35.320 --> 00:40:38.039
<v Speaker 2>talking about, that's this is why Huxley went to Berkeley

641
00:40:38.079 --> 00:40:43.039
<v Speaker 2>and gave this famous famous lecture Berkeley. Hello, Right, this

642
00:40:43.239 --> 00:40:50.119
<v Speaker 2>is hippie Central saying that you will be given giant

643
00:40:50.159 --> 00:40:54.280
<v Speaker 2>loads of drugs and you will be ushered into the technocracy.

644
00:40:54.400 --> 00:40:55.840
<v Speaker 2>That's what he says in the lecture. And he says

645
00:40:55.920 --> 00:40:58.079
<v Speaker 2>even says at one point, all you people in the

646
00:40:58.079 --> 00:41:00.360
<v Speaker 2>audience are too stupid to even understand that I'm telling

647
00:41:00.360 --> 00:41:02.599
<v Speaker 2>you that this is really going to happen. Wow.

648
00:41:04.239 --> 00:41:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And you know he was right. I mean, most

649
00:41:08.599 --> 00:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of most of the people in the West have no

650
00:41:10.559 --> 00:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>idea what's happening to them.

651
00:41:12.719 --> 00:41:15.440
<v Speaker 2>And he's also not a good guy warning us this

652
00:41:15.559 --> 00:41:16.239
<v Speaker 2>is another mistake.

653
00:41:16.280 --> 00:41:18.599
<v Speaker 4>Now, a lot of people make a mistake and they say, oh,

654
00:41:18.800 --> 00:41:21.679
<v Speaker 4>but to see when I read all the text that

655
00:41:21.760 --> 00:41:25.119
<v Speaker 4>he talks about freedom and he doesn't want us to

656
00:41:25.199 --> 00:41:27.679
<v Speaker 4>be enslaved, that's because he's a liar.

657
00:41:28.159 --> 00:41:31.559
<v Speaker 2>That's because he also wrote elsewhere that he believed in

658
00:41:31.639 --> 00:41:32.079
<v Speaker 2>this plant.

659
00:41:33.960 --> 00:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So how did this impact this shift to the

660
00:41:40.079 --> 00:41:43.079
<v Speaker 1>industrialize and the hippie movement and all this. How did

661
00:41:43.119 --> 00:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this impact Christianity in the West after the hippies started

662
00:41:46.400 --> 00:41:48.599
<v Speaker 1>to rise up. I heard you talking about this recently.

663
00:41:48.679 --> 00:41:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if you could give us a little

664
00:41:50.239 --> 00:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>insight here.

665
00:41:53.320 --> 00:41:55.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, you have the co opting of the church. Basically,

666
00:41:57.679 --> 00:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>even though this Homber Moss talk that I did last

667
00:42:00.199 --> 00:42:04.079
<v Speaker 2>night was for subscribers. It was actually illustrative in one

668
00:42:04.119 --> 00:42:07.960
<v Speaker 2>part where he talks about the churches being made Marxists. Now,

669
00:42:09.000 --> 00:42:11.800
<v Speaker 2>let's put this in context, because in a sense they

670
00:42:11.840 --> 00:42:14.360
<v Speaker 2>were and in a sense they weren't. If you mean

671
00:42:14.440 --> 00:42:18.280
<v Speaker 2>by Marxist, the Frankfurt School Marxist and the cultural degradation

672
00:42:18.440 --> 00:42:22.800
<v Speaker 2>cultural Marxism. Yeah, they have been turned to that. But

673
00:42:22.920 --> 00:42:25.239
<v Speaker 2>how was that done? Was it done by a bunch

674
00:42:25.360 --> 00:42:30.639
<v Speaker 2>of dirty dudes on the streets of hate Ashbury with

675
00:42:30.920 --> 00:42:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Chay Gavara T shirts and wearing a beret. No, it

676
00:42:38.079 --> 00:42:45.679
<v Speaker 2>was done by giant hordes of money behind the Frankfurt

677
00:42:45.679 --> 00:42:49.000
<v Speaker 2>School as one example. It was done with giant amounts

678
00:42:49.039 --> 00:42:51.800
<v Speaker 2>of money put into studying the effects of LSD, by

679
00:42:51.880 --> 00:42:56.039
<v Speaker 2>the military, by the CIA, by psychiatric institutions. It was

680
00:42:56.119 --> 00:43:02.440
<v Speaker 2>done by the promotion of the degenerate rock bands. Right,

681
00:43:02.760 --> 00:43:08.639
<v Speaker 2>So this changed the culture. And because American Christianity, American

682
00:43:08.719 --> 00:43:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Christianity from the beginning, I would say, has been very

683
00:43:12.280 --> 00:43:17.840
<v Speaker 2>troubled and kind of on a double think dilemma because

684
00:43:18.239 --> 00:43:20.679
<v Speaker 2>of the weaknesses, I would say, and they found the

685
00:43:20.760 --> 00:43:26.519
<v Speaker 2>ideology of America. There's always been a susceptibility in American Christianity.

686
00:43:26.639 --> 00:43:30.800
<v Speaker 2>To instead of informing the culture to mirror the culture.

687
00:43:31.119 --> 00:43:33.519
<v Speaker 2>So it should be the other way around. But you know,

688
00:43:33.639 --> 00:43:36.239
<v Speaker 2>this is why your preachers in America end up looking

689
00:43:36.440 --> 00:43:40.159
<v Speaker 2>like CEOs. They begin acting like the CEOs and their

690
00:43:40.239 --> 00:43:44.800
<v Speaker 2>churches look like giant strip malls or factories.

691
00:43:45.159 --> 00:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's the heresy of Americanism.

692
00:43:48.320 --> 00:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Yeah. So I think wim Hoff is correct that

693
00:43:52.840 --> 00:44:01.079
<v Speaker 2>the CIA through the facade of the Cold War. I'm

694
00:44:01.079 --> 00:44:04.119
<v Speaker 2>not saying there weren't real persecutions during the Cold War.

695
00:44:04.800 --> 00:44:08.480
<v Speaker 2>In fact, this actually duped a lot of the Russian immigrants,

696
00:44:08.559 --> 00:44:11.719
<v Speaker 2>the white Russians that left Russia. It was British intelligence

697
00:44:11.760 --> 00:44:16.559
<v Speaker 2>and people in the West that brought them over. But

698
00:44:16.880 --> 00:44:19.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that they understood that the long term

699
00:44:19.280 --> 00:44:21.599
<v Speaker 2>game was not that the people in the West were

700
00:44:21.639 --> 00:44:27.159
<v Speaker 2>their friends. The long term game was to ultimately support

701
00:44:27.239 --> 00:44:30.239
<v Speaker 2>the dismantling of Russia and the institution of the New

702
00:44:30.239 --> 00:44:33.719
<v Speaker 2>World Order. And the CIA did a similar tactic with

703
00:44:34.480 --> 00:44:38.119
<v Speaker 2>the Catholic Church by getting the Catholic Church to jump

704
00:44:38.199 --> 00:44:43.159
<v Speaker 2>on board the CIA's doctrinal warfare program of C. D.

705
00:44:43.360 --> 00:44:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Jackson and other characters like that Henry Leoce and that

706
00:44:48.199 --> 00:44:50.960
<v Speaker 2>this ended up being part of the reason why Vatican

707
00:44:51.000 --> 00:44:55.360
<v Speaker 2>two happened and you had the passing of the acceptance

708
00:44:55.440 --> 00:44:58.119
<v Speaker 2>of Dignitatis humani in Nostra Tate.

709
00:45:00.280 --> 00:45:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Just for the listeners out there, not all my listeners

710
00:45:02.559 --> 00:45:05.840
<v Speaker 1>are Catholic, but most of them are. Jay is not Catholic,

711
00:45:05.960 --> 00:45:09.039
<v Speaker 1>He's Orthodox. So just so you aware of that, and

712
00:45:09.920 --> 00:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't have to agree on every single thing,

713
00:45:11.920 --> 00:45:14.519
<v Speaker 1>but look into these things because there definitely has been

714
00:45:14.639 --> 00:45:18.119
<v Speaker 1>deep state influence on the Catholic Church. There's no denying that.

715
00:45:18.400 --> 00:45:22.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, David Wimhoff is a practicing Catholic as I understand,

716
00:45:22.559 --> 00:45:26.519
<v Speaker 2>and he does accept Vatican too, So I'm just using

717
00:45:26.599 --> 00:45:29.960
<v Speaker 2>him as an objective Catholic source who who as a

718
00:45:30.079 --> 00:45:33.519
<v Speaker 2>lawyer in this giant, you know, thousand source page book.

719
00:45:34.760 --> 00:45:37.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, he argues, I would say, definitively, and it

720
00:45:38.199 --> 00:45:40.159
<v Speaker 2>actually makes a lot of sense with all the other

721
00:45:41.000 --> 00:45:43.440
<v Speaker 2>research that isn't Catholic, you know, I mean, Dave mcgallan

722
00:45:43.719 --> 00:45:46.800
<v Speaker 2>is not Catholic, but his or was not Catholic. He's

723
00:45:46.800 --> 00:45:48.920
<v Speaker 2>passed away. But you know, his book was not focused

724
00:45:48.920 --> 00:45:50.719
<v Speaker 2>on religion, but it kind of came to the same

725
00:45:50.800 --> 00:45:54.280
<v Speaker 2>conclusions that you had. The deep state basically interested in

726
00:45:55.239 --> 00:45:59.079
<v Speaker 2>trying to co opt large religious institutions, and you will

727
00:45:59.119 --> 00:46:03.199
<v Speaker 2>find that this is very common. And just think about

728
00:46:03.199 --> 00:46:06.239
<v Speaker 2>it from the deep state perspective. Wouldn't you want to

729
00:46:06.320 --> 00:46:09.840
<v Speaker 2>use the engine of something like Catholicism for your pert Yeah,

730
00:46:09.920 --> 00:46:15.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean Brzenski in between two ages, he says in

731
00:46:15.199 --> 00:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the first few chapters of the book that American and

732
00:46:18.480 --> 00:46:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Americanism has to capture and use these big institutions like

733
00:46:25.039 --> 00:46:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the caloch Church. Yeah.

734
00:46:27.239 --> 00:46:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And this is probably the most conspiratorial type interview

735
00:46:32.239 --> 00:46:35.519
<v Speaker 1>that I've done on this show. I've said often though

736
00:46:35.599 --> 00:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that I believe the people who are in control of

737
00:46:38.480 --> 00:46:42.079
<v Speaker 1>our civilization right now are very evil, and this is

738
00:46:42.280 --> 00:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>just opening up the Pandora's box to look at the

739
00:46:45.480 --> 00:46:49.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of evil that they're doing. These people are diabolical geniuses,

740
00:46:50.000 --> 00:46:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and this is the war between good and evil, which

741
00:46:52.719 --> 00:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is why it's so important for Christians to stay in prayer,

742
00:46:57.360 --> 00:47:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to study philosophy and good solid the and to not

743
00:47:01.039 --> 00:47:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be taken in by this stuff. Because when you fully

744
00:47:03.920 --> 00:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>grasp the amount of conditioning that you've been put through

745
00:47:06.920 --> 00:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>in your life growing up in the second half of

746
00:47:09.320 --> 00:47:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century, in the twenty first century. It's you

747
00:47:12.480 --> 00:47:16.199
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to first principles and reevaluate all

748
00:47:16.280 --> 00:47:20.239
<v Speaker 1>your assumptions about the world. So, and that's a little

749
00:47:20.400 --> 00:47:21.079
<v Speaker 1>closing thought.

750
00:47:21.119 --> 00:47:24.199
<v Speaker 2>I guess, well, one other thing I would say to Catholics,

751
00:47:24.360 --> 00:47:28.679
<v Speaker 2>and I formerly was Catholic, is that there are plenty

752
00:47:28.760 --> 00:47:33.599
<v Speaker 2>of Catholic books that will vindicate what I'm saying, the

753
00:47:33.920 --> 00:47:38.760
<v Speaker 2>most obvious of which are the papal and cyclicals of

754
00:47:38.840 --> 00:47:41.039
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of centuries. And I'm not saying read

755
00:47:41.079 --> 00:47:43.599
<v Speaker 2>all of them, but if anybody does want to delve

756
00:47:43.639 --> 00:47:46.280
<v Speaker 2>into that, you can. I would recommend a couple of things.

757
00:47:46.320 --> 00:47:49.559
<v Speaker 2>I would say, read first and foremost Leo the thirteenth

758
00:47:49.639 --> 00:47:55.119
<v Speaker 2>and cyclical Humanum Janus on Freemasonry. Then I would say

759
00:47:55.280 --> 00:48:01.000
<v Speaker 2>read the Tan Books, the Tan Publisher, the Popes against

760
00:48:01.039 --> 00:48:05.119
<v Speaker 2>the modern errors. And then if you read those two things,

761
00:48:05.159 --> 00:48:09.280
<v Speaker 2>you'll see that you know, this is not a crackpot

762
00:48:09.360 --> 00:48:11.840
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy theory, but something that the papacy has been talking

763
00:48:11.880 --> 00:48:14.239
<v Speaker 2>about for a long time. In fact, years old, there

764
00:48:14.280 --> 00:48:17.639
<v Speaker 2>was a whole slew of anti Masonic papal and cyccles.

765
00:48:18.000 --> 00:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that, honestly, that kind of thing was really what

766
00:48:21.599 --> 00:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>got me interested in Catholicism was seeing how the popes

767
00:48:25.559 --> 00:48:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and the Church were really at odds with this evil

768
00:48:28.840 --> 00:48:31.840
<v Speaker 1>agenda in early in the twentieth century. And I'm sad

769
00:48:31.880 --> 00:48:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to say that it's lost a lot of ground in

770
00:48:34.199 --> 00:48:38.519
<v Speaker 1>the second half. But anyway that those encyclicals are definitely

771
00:48:38.599 --> 00:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>eye opening. To be sure, we need to just show

772
00:48:40.760 --> 00:48:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on Freemason recent time in their battle of the Catholic Church.

773
00:48:43.840 --> 00:48:47.519
<v Speaker 1>That would be interesting, Yeah, it would be.

774
00:48:50.000 --> 00:48:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I I've also been reading a cult Renaissance Church of Rome,

775
00:48:56.039 --> 00:49:00.199
<v Speaker 2>which is a critique of the Renaissance era papacy by

776
00:49:00.360 --> 00:49:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Michael Hoffman. I think he makes a very compelling case.

777
00:49:03.519 --> 00:49:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he's very weak when he tries to explain

778
00:49:06.920 --> 00:49:09.320
<v Speaker 2>the first millennium of the Church, but I think for

779
00:49:09.400 --> 00:49:11.519
<v Speaker 2>the second millennium of the Church, he also makes a

780
00:49:11.639 --> 00:49:14.400
<v Speaker 2>very interesting case that it's not like everything was rosy,

781
00:49:15.119 --> 00:49:18.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, prior to the French Revolution, right, there was

782
00:49:19.320 --> 00:49:25.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the same kinds of hermetic, gnostic, Platonic

783
00:49:26.039 --> 00:49:32.119
<v Speaker 2>and cabalistic influence prior to you know, the modern Enlightenment

784
00:49:32.159 --> 00:49:32.800
<v Speaker 2>period as well.

785
00:49:33.239 --> 00:49:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I was saying on the last show that

786
00:49:35.920 --> 00:49:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this kind of worldview we've been talking about is a

787
00:49:38.559 --> 00:49:43.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of form of gnosticism, And really narcissism has been

788
00:49:43.280 --> 00:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>around since the first century of the Church. It's waxed

789
00:49:45.920 --> 00:49:49.559
<v Speaker 1>and waned in its influence and presence. But really, when

790
00:49:49.639 --> 00:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you start to think that you can use your willpower

791
00:49:52.400 --> 00:49:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and technology to override the laws of God and the

792
00:49:56.039 --> 00:49:59.199
<v Speaker 1>natural law He's written into reality, that is the form

793
00:49:59.239 --> 00:50:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of nissism trying to escape physical reality. Anyway, So that

794
00:50:03.960 --> 00:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>would be my thought on it.

795
00:50:05.039 --> 00:50:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I would totally agree, And just having a discussion with

796
00:50:08.079 --> 00:50:10.840
<v Speaker 2>some people today about this, we were kind of arguing

797
00:50:10.880 --> 00:50:16.000
<v Speaker 2>about the question of race, ethnicity, gender, these kinds of things.

798
00:50:16.800 --> 00:50:20.880
<v Speaker 2>And when you believe in the goodness of God as

799
00:50:20.880 --> 00:50:25.440
<v Speaker 2>a creator, which gnostics don't, when you do believe that

800
00:50:25.920 --> 00:50:29.639
<v Speaker 2>God is a good creator, you suddenly don't have as

801
00:50:29.719 --> 00:50:34.519
<v Speaker 2>much of a problem with there being other ethnicities, other races,

802
00:50:34.639 --> 00:50:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and different genders. That real diversity is not an issue

803
00:50:39.000 --> 00:50:42.199
<v Speaker 2>for you. You're not worried about it. And for Orthodox

804
00:50:42.559 --> 00:50:46.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, we have our tradition of iconography being done

805
00:50:46.519 --> 00:50:50.599
<v Speaker 2>a certain way always. You can't you can't like make

806
00:50:50.679 --> 00:50:52.719
<v Speaker 2>up some kind of new way to do icons, and

807
00:50:52.800 --> 00:50:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that's because we believe that they don't just show us

808
00:50:57.960 --> 00:51:02.800
<v Speaker 2>a window into heaven. But I banography also confirms the

809
00:51:02.920 --> 00:51:07.000
<v Speaker 2>veracity and truth of history. So if there's a saint

810
00:51:07.280 --> 00:51:10.760
<v Speaker 2>like Saint Moses the Black who was a famous black man,

811
00:51:10.920 --> 00:51:14.199
<v Speaker 2>who's a saint, you know, he and his icon, he's

812
00:51:14.239 --> 00:51:19.400
<v Speaker 2>going to retain his physical characteristics, in his race and

813
00:51:19.559 --> 00:51:22.280
<v Speaker 2>his gender. And you know, in the in the Book

814
00:51:22.280 --> 00:51:26.119
<v Speaker 2>of Revelation, when when John sees into heaven, when he

815
00:51:26.159 --> 00:51:32.000
<v Speaker 2>sees the eternal state, he says he sees every race, tribe, tongue,

816
00:51:32.440 --> 00:51:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and ethnicity present. Uh. And that's because, of course Christ

817
00:51:36.519 --> 00:51:39.119
<v Speaker 2>died for all, there's no question about that. But Christ

818
00:51:39.239 --> 00:51:41.880
<v Speaker 2>dying for all does not mean that he wipes out

819
00:51:41.960 --> 00:51:44.960
<v Speaker 2>people's history and ethnicity anymore than it means he wipes

820
00:51:45.000 --> 00:51:48.280
<v Speaker 2>out gender. So that's why it's very important for us

821
00:51:48.360 --> 00:51:51.760
<v Speaker 2>that you don't you know, you know Jesus. Think about Jesus.

822
00:51:51.800 --> 00:51:56.440
<v Speaker 2>When he's resurrected, he doesn't become pans you know, pan gender,

823
00:51:56.559 --> 00:52:01.440
<v Speaker 2>pan racial Jesus. He becomes a no longer subject to

824
00:52:01.719 --> 00:52:05.599
<v Speaker 2>to death. Well technically speaking, he wasn't subject death, but

825
00:52:05.679 --> 00:52:08.239
<v Speaker 2>he willingly underwent death. You know what I'm saying. In

826
00:52:08.400 --> 00:52:11.280
<v Speaker 2>his resurrected state, it's still the same Jesus because he

827
00:52:11.320 --> 00:52:13.360
<v Speaker 2>has a hole in his side. Thomas puts his fingers

828
00:52:13.440 --> 00:52:18.280
<v Speaker 2>in and he says, you know, he says that we

829
00:52:18.360 --> 00:52:21.119
<v Speaker 2>will be like him. We'll have the same type of resurrection,

830
00:52:21.719 --> 00:52:25.119
<v Speaker 2>which does not negate our historical existence and who we were.

831
00:52:26.079 --> 00:52:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Sure, So if you're a black Christian, you die and

832
00:52:28.760 --> 00:52:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you're resurrected, you're going to still be a black resurrected Christian.

833
00:52:33.320 --> 00:52:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, absolutely, yeah. I mean, this is the thing about

834
00:52:36.760 --> 00:52:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Babel and the new world order, globalism, transhumanism, It is Babel.

835
00:52:41.800 --> 00:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You know.

836
00:52:42.039 --> 00:52:44.679
<v Speaker 2>They say we want to make a power to Heaven

837
00:52:45.360 --> 00:52:48.760
<v Speaker 2>in our own name, right, And that's contrasted with Abraham,

838
00:52:49.400 --> 00:52:53.119
<v Speaker 2>who builds an altar to the Lord and calls him

839
00:52:53.159 --> 00:52:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the name of the Lord. So Abraham's religion is based

840
00:52:57.559 --> 00:53:03.480
<v Speaker 2>around theology and faith first, and babel Worldly religion, the

841
00:53:03.559 --> 00:53:06.639
<v Speaker 2>City of Man, as Augustine called it, is based around

842
00:53:06.719 --> 00:53:09.599
<v Speaker 2>the idea of man will be God. And that's what

843
00:53:09.719 --> 00:53:13.639
<v Speaker 2>transhumanism is. It's just a repeating of that, and Babel

844
00:53:14.039 --> 00:53:19.320
<v Speaker 2>is still manifesting today in globalism. Babel is the idea

845
00:53:19.559 --> 00:53:22.840
<v Speaker 2>of wrecking all the different cultures and nations and tribes

846
00:53:23.400 --> 00:53:27.199
<v Speaker 2>into one giant blob run by Skynet.

847
00:53:28.000 --> 00:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that is what's going on in Europe with

848
00:53:31.039 --> 00:53:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the Muslim invasion and the United States and even in China.

849
00:53:34.719 --> 00:53:36.760
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to do this in every country that has

850
00:53:37.039 --> 00:53:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a national mono culture, they're trying to turn it into

851
00:53:40.360 --> 00:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the New World Order, corporatistic gray glob.

852
00:53:44.320 --> 00:53:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So exactly. Yeah, yeah, totally agree.

853
00:53:47.519 --> 00:53:50.559
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, Jay Dyer, thanks for coming on. That

854
00:53:50.679 --> 00:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was a great chat. I hope to have you back

855
00:53:53.000 --> 00:53:55.760
<v Speaker 1>soon to talk about some more theological issues if that's

856
00:53:55.800 --> 00:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>amenable to you, Sure anytime, all right, Well, I sure

857
00:54:01.000 --> 00:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Man, God be with you, all right.

858
00:54:04.239 --> 00:54:07.639
<v Speaker 2>And I would add two that if people are interested

859
00:54:07.679 --> 00:54:10.199
<v Speaker 2>in my book is still available, and if you would

860
00:54:10.280 --> 00:54:11.800
<v Speaker 2>like to get a copy of it, please get it

861
00:54:11.840 --> 00:54:16.000
<v Speaker 2>from me and not Amazon because Amazon undercuts authors. My

862
00:54:16.119 --> 00:54:19.960
<v Speaker 2>book is not in occult book. It is a comparative

863
00:54:20.039 --> 00:54:25.519
<v Speaker 2>religion analysis of different movies and films in three hundred

864
00:54:25.519 --> 00:54:28.639
<v Speaker 2>and sixty three pages with four hundred four footnotes, and

865
00:54:28.760 --> 00:54:33.920
<v Speaker 2>it includes very subtle critiques of things like Darwinism and

866
00:54:34.119 --> 00:54:39.679
<v Speaker 2>atheism in under the guise of film analysis.

867
00:54:40.400 --> 00:54:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So I'm kind of still kind of new at

868
00:54:42.239 --> 00:54:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast game. So I forgot the plug section. I

869
00:54:44.880 --> 00:54:48.880
<v Speaker 1>also wanted to say, if you go into podcast Addict

870
00:54:48.960 --> 00:54:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and search Jaydyer, you'll get jay'son Analysis RSS feed on

871
00:54:52.639 --> 00:54:55.119
<v Speaker 1>there and get all this great content. He's been putting

872
00:54:55.119 --> 00:54:58.079
<v Speaker 1>out some awesome stuff lately. Maybe you have another method

873
00:54:58.159 --> 00:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they can find that feed as well.

874
00:55:00.039 --> 00:55:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Well. It should be on all the major feeds like that.

875
00:55:04.639 --> 00:55:08.800
<v Speaker 2>It's on Spreaker, and it's on iTunes, and you know,

876
00:55:08.920 --> 00:55:13.119
<v Speaker 2>you can always go to YouTube the same. My my

877
00:55:13.239 --> 00:55:15.760
<v Speaker 2>stuff goes out to all those areas.

878
00:55:17.039 --> 00:55:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Good deal, all right, man, Well thanks again and you

879
00:55:20.239 --> 00:55:21.599
<v Speaker 1>have a good eating all right.

880
00:55:21.639 --> 00:55:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you,
