WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Today, I want to tell you about a journey that

2
00:00:01.600 --> 00:00:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I've been on for most of my life. Ever since

3
00:00:03.919 --> 00:00:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, I've heard tales of bigfoot and

4
00:00:05.839 --> 00:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>wild men while spending time with my friends and family.

5
00:00:09.039 --> 00:00:11.439
<v Speaker 1>As I grew older and read more about the paranormal,

6
00:00:11.599 --> 00:00:14.679
<v Speaker 1>my interest in encryptids and other things strange only deepened.

7
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm so excited to share with you what

8
00:00:17.199 --> 00:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I've personally become involved with the Untold Radio Network. The

9
00:00:21.719 --> 00:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Untold Radio Network is a live streaming podcast network that

10
00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:29.359
<v Speaker 1>airs a new show every day across all podcast platforms, YouTube,

11
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and more. They have eight different shows on all sorts

12
00:00:32.159 --> 00:00:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of exciting topics such as bigfoot, cryptids, UFOs, aliens, and

13
00:00:36.200 --> 00:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>much more. I even have my own show called Weird Encounters,

14
00:00:39.479 --> 00:00:42.439
<v Speaker 1>where I talk about all things strange. This is more

15
00:00:42.479 --> 00:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>than just a podcast network. It's a community that allows

16
00:00:45.320 --> 00:00:47.759
<v Speaker 1>me to meet so many amazing people who share their

17
00:00:47.799 --> 00:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stories and experiences with strange. If you're interested in hearing

18
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more of these stories and learning more about the paranormal

19
00:00:53.960 --> 00:00:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and encryptids, make sure you check out the Untold Radio

20
00:00:56.759 --> 00:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Network for all kinds of exciting shows. It's free to subscribe.

21
00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So what are you waiting for visit www dot untold

22
00:01:04.519 --> 00:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>radionetwork dot com today.

23
00:01:06.760 --> 00:01:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, what are your reporting? I got a screen going

24
00:01:09.719 --> 00:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>on here. Something just kid with my dog, something to

25
00:01:12.200 --> 00:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>kill your dog? My dog. We're flying through there, over

26
00:01:15.319 --> 00:01:20.079
<v Speaker 2>the tree. I don't know how it did it. Okay, damn,

27
00:01:20.159 --> 00:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm really confused. All I saw was my dog coming

28
00:01:22.680 --> 00:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>over the fence and name was dead once you hit

29
00:01:24.519 --> 00:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the grill. I didn't see any cars. All I saw

30
00:01:26.680 --> 00:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>was my dog coming over the fence. Sat, what are

31
00:01:45.120 --> 00:01:49.959
<v Speaker 2>you reporting? We got some wonder or something crawling around

32
00:01:50.040 --> 00:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>out here? Did you see what it was? It was

33
00:01:59.359 --> 00:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>enough here. Look, I'm new to window now and I

34
00:02:01.560 --> 00:02:08.840
<v Speaker 2>don't need anything. I don't want to go outside. Its fight. Hello,

35
00:02:10.439 --> 00:02:12.919
<v Speaker 2>hit the buddy out here. Footquot on out there? It's

36
00:02:12.960 --> 00:02:15.639
<v Speaker 2>thought of a bench about six foot nine. I don't know.

37
00:02:15.919 --> 00:02:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Easy ann out there. Yeah, I'm working right heady.

38
00:02:19.199 --> 00:02:21.319
<v Speaker 1>As most of you know. I've cast footprints here on

39
00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the property in the past, and frankly, the set that

40
00:02:23.879 --> 00:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I cast here on the property back in October of

41
00:02:26.439 --> 00:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>last year single handedly convinced me that there is sasquatch

42
00:02:30.319 --> 00:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>activity in the area. Footprint evidence, in general is some

43
00:02:34.719 --> 00:02:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of the most compelling evidence that I feel points to

44
00:02:37.800 --> 00:02:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the existence of a large bipedal hominoid of some sort

45
00:02:41.560 --> 00:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>here in North America. But the validity of such tracks

46
00:02:45.400 --> 00:02:48.599
<v Speaker 1>and cast of those tracks has always been a bone

47
00:02:48.680 --> 00:02:51.879
<v Speaker 1>of contention for most people in the bigfoot community. I

48
00:02:51.919 --> 00:02:54.879
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about three sets of footprints in particular

49
00:02:54.919 --> 00:02:59.199
<v Speaker 1>from June of nineteen eighty two in southeastern Washington State.

50
00:02:59.879 --> 00:03:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I decided to talk about these in particular because of

51
00:03:03.199 --> 00:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the prints themselves, as well as what appeared to be

52
00:03:07.000 --> 00:03:11.879
<v Speaker 1>dramatoglyphics or dermal ridges that were captured in the prints themselves.

53
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:15.159
<v Speaker 1>In the interest of not wanting to reinvent the wheel here,

54
00:03:15.199 --> 00:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I did some research and I found a phenomenal article

55
00:03:18.199 --> 00:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>written by friend of the show, Darryl Collier, back in

56
00:03:21.039 --> 00:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>December of two thousand and seven. This and many other

57
00:03:24.639 --> 00:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>articles on the subject are right there for you to

58
00:03:27.039 --> 00:03:29.759
<v Speaker 1>read on woodape dot org. There's a button right here

59
00:03:29.759 --> 00:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes. All you have to do is

60
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:33.319
<v Speaker 1>click it. It'll take you right over to the website

61
00:03:33.319 --> 00:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and you can read this article in its entirety, as

62
00:03:35.840 --> 00:03:39.039
<v Speaker 1>well as all the other amazing resources they have on

63
00:03:39.080 --> 00:03:41.919
<v Speaker 1>this site. That said, I would like to read it

64
00:03:41.960 --> 00:03:46.159
<v Speaker 1>for you right now. Casts of three large human like

65
00:03:46.199 --> 00:03:49.719
<v Speaker 1>footprints were made by US four Service personnel in June

66
00:03:49.840 --> 00:03:54.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty two in southeastern Washington State. The fine grain

67
00:03:54.879 --> 00:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>soil preserved many impressions of dermal ridges and sweat pores.

68
00:03:59.360 --> 00:04:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Careful stuff by dramaticglyphics. Experts show these impressions are perfectly

69
00:04:03.800 --> 00:04:07.879
<v Speaker 1>consistent with the friction skin found only in higher primates.

70
00:04:08.439 --> 00:04:12.159
<v Speaker 1>The foot size of thirty seven point five by seventeen

71
00:04:12.280 --> 00:04:17.079
<v Speaker 1>centimeters rules out any known primate. The non opposed first

72
00:04:17.160 --> 00:04:22.439
<v Speaker 1>digit indicates a hominid. Physical circumstances suggest a weight of

73
00:04:22.519 --> 00:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>three hundred to four hundred kilograms. It is believed that

74
00:04:26.319 --> 00:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>all possible methods of fakingness evidence have been considered and

75
00:04:30.120 --> 00:04:34.879
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. New animal species become generally accepted when a

76
00:04:34.920 --> 00:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>physical specimen is collected and properly described. Most commonly living

77
00:04:40.160 --> 00:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>species are initially demonstrated by the skin and skull of

78
00:04:44.000 --> 00:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one individual. Extinct species are based on fossilized bone or shelle,

79
00:04:49.399 --> 00:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>often on rather small fragments. Some are proposed even on

80
00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the basis of such indirect evidence, such as burrows or tracts.

81
00:04:58.199 --> 00:05:01.759
<v Speaker 1>In all cases, something tangible is required, which is deposited

82
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:04.759
<v Speaker 1>in a collection somewhere and which can be examined later

83
00:05:04.839 --> 00:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>by persons other than the discoverer. Only in the case

84
00:05:08.519 --> 00:05:13.079
<v Speaker 1>of relatively unimportant subspecies might acceptance be based only on

85
00:05:13.360 --> 00:05:18.959
<v Speaker 1>unsubstantiated observations by qualified authorities. There are no clear rules

86
00:05:18.959 --> 00:05:21.439
<v Speaker 1>about the kind and amount of evidence that must be

87
00:05:21.480 --> 00:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>provided in each case. Instead, there is an unstated consensus

88
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>that evidence depends on the nature of the animal, or

89
00:05:28.839 --> 00:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>more properly, on our emotional reactions to it. The more

90
00:05:33.000 --> 00:05:36.759
<v Speaker 1>unlikely or unexpected the species, the more proof is required

91
00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:41.079
<v Speaker 1>to establish its existence. A new subspecies of chipmunk might

92
00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>seriously be considered on the eyewitness testimony of one competent zoologist,

93
00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:49.399
<v Speaker 1>but if the giraffe were unknown to science, five expert

94
00:05:49.439 --> 00:05:54.519
<v Speaker 1>accounts supported by photographs and footprints would hardly suffice. Similarly,

95
00:05:54.879 --> 00:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the first platypus skin brought to Europe was suspected of

96
00:05:58.199 --> 00:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>being faked. There have been persistent reports for over a

97
00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:06.759
<v Speaker 1>century that a species of large bipedal higher primate known

98
00:06:06.800 --> 00:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as sasquatch or bigfoot lives wild in North America and

99
00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>other areas as well. Quite rightly, zoologists and anthropologists have

100
00:06:15.360 --> 00:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not accepted this animal on the testimony of claimed eye witnesses,

101
00:06:19.240 --> 00:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>however many they may be. The supposed species is too unexpected,

102
00:06:23.920 --> 00:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as potentially too significant base any firm conclusions

103
00:06:27.959 --> 00:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>on unverified accounts. If we accepted every creature that is

104
00:06:32.040 --> 00:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>supported by the testimony of ten or more claimed sightings,

105
00:06:35.680 --> 00:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>then we would truly have an unwieldy zoological inventory of

106
00:06:39.279 --> 00:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>mostly unclassifiable creatures, including unicorns, goblins, griffins, fairies, mothmen, and

107
00:06:46.759 --> 00:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the like. Most scientists would agree that only good skeletal

108
00:06:50.720 --> 00:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>evidence would establish the reality of a species like the sasquatch.

109
00:06:55.240 --> 00:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>A few specialists would be satisfied with such esoteric evidence

110
00:06:58.720 --> 00:07:02.079
<v Speaker 1>as a test tube full of bloe. Likewise, a few

111
00:07:02.120 --> 00:07:06.519
<v Speaker 1>specialists would be convinced by anatomically clear footprints recorded under

112
00:07:06.560 --> 00:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>satisfactory circumstances. If we were simply dealing with an oversized

113
00:07:11.160 --> 00:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>subspecies of an accepted animal, such footprints would probably gain

114
00:07:15.399 --> 00:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>general acceptance. As it is, However, we should not be

115
00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:22.079
<v Speaker 1>surprised if the best of all possible footprint impressions of

116
00:07:22.079 --> 00:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a sasquatch were ignored or denied by most of the

117
00:07:25.160 --> 00:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>scientific establishment. That is, exactly what we are confronted with.

118
00:07:29.720 --> 00:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>On June tenth, nineteen eighty two, US Forest Service patrolman

119
00:07:33.519 --> 00:07:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Paul Freeman was surveying Elk in the Yumatilla National Forest

120
00:07:37.800 --> 00:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on the border of Washington and Oregon States. That morning,

121
00:07:41.600 --> 00:07:45.079
<v Speaker 1>he reported seeing at relatively close range an animal of

122
00:07:45.160 --> 00:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>human shape, hair covered, standing about two point five meters tall,

123
00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:53.959
<v Speaker 1>with an estimated weight of over four hundred kilograms. This

124
00:07:54.040 --> 00:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>event is typical of hundreds of descriptions of encounters with

125
00:07:57.360 --> 00:08:02.519
<v Speaker 1>a supposed but unverified sasquatch. Other Forest Service personnel from

126
00:08:02.560 --> 00:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the Walla Walla Ranger District Office in Walla Walla, Washington

127
00:08:06.240 --> 00:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>were called to the scene that day, and they observed

128
00:08:08.680 --> 00:08:11.959
<v Speaker 1>many apparent footprints that were consistent with an animal of

129
00:08:11.959 --> 00:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that description. Many photographs were taken and a plaster cast

130
00:08:15.839 --> 00:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>was made of one of these impressions. The following day,

131
00:08:19.399 --> 00:08:22.399
<v Speaker 1>a search and rescue team on an unrelated mission came

132
00:08:22.480 --> 00:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>upon the scene, took more photographs, made another cast, and

133
00:08:26.560 --> 00:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>attempted to track the creature. One week later, on June seventeenth,

134
00:08:31.120 --> 00:08:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Freeman and other foresters encountered more footprints a few miles

135
00:08:34.799 --> 00:08:38.879
<v Speaker 1>away at a place called Elk Wallow, this time of

136
00:08:38.960 --> 00:08:42.519
<v Speaker 1>two individuals. One of these sets of tracks matched the

137
00:08:42.600 --> 00:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>tracks at the sighting location, and a third cast was made.

138
00:08:46.639 --> 00:08:50.519
<v Speaker 1>The second individual left slightly different tracks, and three casts

139
00:08:50.559 --> 00:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>were made of these. The analysis in this article centers

140
00:08:53.759 --> 00:08:56.399
<v Speaker 1>on these three new tracks from Elk Wallow and the

141
00:08:56.440 --> 00:09:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Mill Creek Watershed. During the following winter, Freemen and other

142
00:09:00.840 --> 00:09:05.159
<v Speaker 1>investigators found additional tracks. On several occasions they made more

143
00:09:05.159 --> 00:09:09.039
<v Speaker 1>plaster cast, indicating the existence of at least two more individuals.

144
00:09:09.639 --> 00:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>In all, eleven casts of four distinguishable types have been made.

145
00:09:14.639 --> 00:09:17.039
<v Speaker 1>Five of these casts were made by the Forest Service

146
00:09:17.080 --> 00:09:20.039
<v Speaker 1>workers in June of nineteen eighty two, and the originals

147
00:09:20.080 --> 00:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>are still in my possession pending their ultimate disposition. One

148
00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>made by Art Snow of the Search and Rescue team

149
00:09:27.399 --> 00:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and five more made by Paul Freeman himself have been

150
00:09:30.480 --> 00:09:34.399
<v Speaker 1>copied with latex or selastic molds and returned to their owners.

151
00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>The study is not concerned with the truth or accuracy

152
00:09:37.720 --> 00:09:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of Freeman's claim sighting. It is also not concerned with

153
00:09:40.960 --> 00:09:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the full range of tracks and the differences between them,

154
00:09:44.159 --> 00:09:47.039
<v Speaker 1>nor do I stress the physical circumstances of the supposed

155
00:09:47.080 --> 00:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Sasquatch trails themselves convincing as they may be. Instead, the

156
00:09:51.639 --> 00:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>emphasis here is on the morphology of the three elk

157
00:09:54.360 --> 00:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Wallow track casts, which showed the greatest detail, especially in

158
00:09:58.679 --> 00:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>terms of the pattern of dermal ridges that was observed

159
00:10:01.559 --> 00:10:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in the actual tracks and that has been preserved in

160
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of the plaster casts. The prevailing soil type in

161
00:10:08.240 --> 00:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>this region is wind blown lowess, a very fine grain

162
00:10:11.799 --> 00:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>substance with typical particle sizes of around zero point zero

163
00:10:15.279 --> 00:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>one millimeters in diameter. When this soil is damp and

164
00:10:19.200 --> 00:10:22.759
<v Speaker 1>cool and pressed into by a warm body, a detailed

165
00:10:22.799 --> 00:10:26.799
<v Speaker 1>imprint commonly remains. Most, if not all, of these tracks

166
00:10:26.799 --> 00:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>were cast within the day of the time of the impression,

167
00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so they are not dried out, nor had they received

168
00:10:32.440 --> 00:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>any intrusive material. The well mixed casting plaster that was

169
00:10:36.600 --> 00:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>poured into these impressions was able to record any degree

170
00:10:39.759 --> 00:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of detail that was held by the soil. Variations down

171
00:10:43.360 --> 00:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to less than point one millimeter are faithfully preserved. This

172
00:10:47.559 --> 00:10:50.759
<v Speaker 1>is fine enough to show the individual dermal ridges and

173
00:10:50.840 --> 00:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>their sweat pores. While the above described circumstances seem perfectly

174
00:10:55.120 --> 00:10:59.039
<v Speaker 1>reasonable in hindsight, I was initially unconvinced that such detail

175
00:10:59.080 --> 00:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>could transfer from skin to dirt to plaster. A simple

176
00:11:03.240 --> 00:11:07.519
<v Speaker 1>test demonstrated its feasibility. The top soil on my property

177
00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in Pullman, Washington is of similar loess. I experimentally depressed

178
00:11:12.639 --> 00:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>my own thumb into a piece of the top soil

179
00:11:15.480 --> 00:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and made a plaster cast of the impression. It faithfully

180
00:11:19.039 --> 00:11:21.799
<v Speaker 1>recorded the dermal ridges and some of the sweat pores

181
00:11:21.840 --> 00:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of my skin. I have since found out through discussions

182
00:11:25.120 --> 00:11:28.519
<v Speaker 1>with police officials that footprint patterns in dirt are actually

183
00:11:28.639 --> 00:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>used for criminal identification in India and New Zealand. A

184
00:11:32.840 --> 00:11:35.279
<v Speaker 1>US Border Patrol tracker who was called in by the

185
00:11:35.320 --> 00:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Force Service to help in the Walla Walla investigation declared

186
00:11:38.720 --> 00:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the tracks to be fakes because of the presence of

187
00:11:41.039 --> 00:11:44.399
<v Speaker 1>these dermal ridges. He pointed out that of all North

188
00:11:44.440 --> 00:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>American mammals, only humans have fully developed friction skin on

189
00:11:48.679 --> 00:11:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the soles of their feet. He did not allow for

190
00:11:51.320 --> 00:11:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of the track maker being another higher primate,

191
00:11:55.360 --> 00:11:57.919
<v Speaker 1>all of which have the same kind of friction skin

192
00:11:58.120 --> 00:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with virtually identical dermal res. Illustrating these tracks proved to

193
00:12:02.879 --> 00:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>be a difficult problem. Photographing an entire cast for general

194
00:12:06.879 --> 00:12:10.159
<v Speaker 1>shape was simple enough, but the detail was another matter.

195
00:12:11.080 --> 00:12:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Given the significance of these fine lines and the controversy

196
00:12:14.440 --> 00:12:17.399
<v Speaker 1>over their source, it was obvious that these drawings would

197
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>not be satisfactory. Some objective method was needed to transfer

198
00:12:21.159 --> 00:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the pattern of ridges directly into black and white images

199
00:12:24.240 --> 00:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>for publication. Attempts at inking and rolling were not successful

200
00:12:28.600 --> 00:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on cast copies, and it was decided not to try

201
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:35.759
<v Speaker 1>inking any of the originals. Fingerprint dust, commonly used by

202
00:12:35.759 --> 00:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint specialists, and tape removal also worked well only on

203
00:12:39.639 --> 00:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>small areas at a time. On cast copies. The relief

204
00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of these ridges is generally under point two millimeters, so

205
00:12:47.279 --> 00:12:49.799
<v Speaker 1>they are best seen on the cast with only oblique

206
00:12:49.879 --> 00:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>lighting that throws the furrows into shadow. A number of

207
00:12:53.639 --> 00:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>close up photographs of small areas were made with this method.

208
00:12:57.480 --> 00:12:59.799
<v Speaker 1>These are shown here with their locations on the full

209
00:12:59.799 --> 00:13:03.919
<v Speaker 1>cares clearly indicated. Some of these photographs have already been published.

210
00:13:04.279 --> 00:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>This method of illustration is limited because of the curved

211
00:13:07.399 --> 00:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>surfaces of a rigid structure. Beyond a small area, details

212
00:13:11.720 --> 00:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>are either thrown into shadow or else they are lost

213
00:13:14.600 --> 00:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>when the light enters all depressions. In overall morphology, these

214
00:13:19.120 --> 00:13:24.799
<v Speaker 1>prints resemble human feet considerably expanded. Individual footprints vary in

215
00:13:24.919 --> 00:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>size due to differences in depth of imprinting, motions of

216
00:13:28.159 --> 00:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the foot in stepping, and apparently from flexibility of the

217
00:13:31.240 --> 00:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>padding and the soul. The primary individual under consideration here

218
00:13:35.679 --> 00:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>left imprints thirty seven to thirty eight centimeters long, ten

219
00:13:39.639 --> 00:13:43.399
<v Speaker 1>centimeters wide at the heel, and seventeen centimeters wide at

220
00:13:43.480 --> 00:13:47.759
<v Speaker 1>maximum on their forefoot. Edward Palmer of the Sheriff's Department

221
00:13:47.799 --> 00:13:52.279
<v Speaker 1>at Laramie County, Wyoming, contacted major shoe manufacturers about human

222
00:13:52.320 --> 00:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>feet of the size. John Robinson of Nike Shoes informed

223
00:13:56.480 --> 00:13:59.159
<v Speaker 1>him that an extraordinary human could have a foot of

224
00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:02.759
<v Speaker 1>this length, but not of this breadth. The same conclusion

225
00:14:02.840 --> 00:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is evident in data from red Wing shoes. Palma was

226
00:14:06.159 --> 00:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>able to trace the dermal ridge patterns across the ball

227
00:14:09.519 --> 00:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and interdigital areas of one cast without break, thus showing

228
00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:16.879
<v Speaker 1>that the cast adequately represented the breadth of the foot.

229
00:14:17.320 --> 00:14:20.279
<v Speaker 1>This fact alone appears to rule out a human foot

230
00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:25.039
<v Speaker 1>being involved. The accomplishments of stride length, slope climbing, and

231
00:14:25.120 --> 00:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>depth of impression also rule out a human. This would

232
00:14:28.720 --> 00:14:32.159
<v Speaker 1>be especially true of any really giant humans who are

233
00:14:32.200 --> 00:14:36.399
<v Speaker 1>far less adept at moving themselves around than normally sized persons.

234
00:14:37.159 --> 00:14:40.559
<v Speaker 1>The imprints indicate that there was no longitudinal arch in

235
00:14:40.600 --> 00:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the foot. This would be expected for a biped of

236
00:14:43.639 --> 00:14:46.759
<v Speaker 1>this size, where the strengths of supporting structures do not

237
00:14:46.919 --> 00:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>keep up with their body weight. In addition, there is

238
00:14:50.120 --> 00:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>no reason to believe that the ankle is set relatively

239
00:14:52.879 --> 00:14:57.039
<v Speaker 1>farther forward on the foot than in humans. And stay

240
00:14:57.120 --> 00:14:59.559
<v Speaker 1>tuned for more sasquatch Ota see will be right back

241
00:14:59.639 --> 00:15:07.039
<v Speaker 1>after that these messages. This observation was supported by Benny

242
00:15:07.120 --> 00:15:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Kling of the Wyoming Law Enforcement Academy, who was the

243
00:15:10.440 --> 00:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>first to examine late lifts from the Prince. He interpreted

244
00:15:14.240 --> 00:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the imprint as showing that disproportionate weight was carried on

245
00:15:17.360 --> 00:15:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the front of the foot as compared with the human,

246
00:15:20.360 --> 00:15:24.039
<v Speaker 1>and asked if the creature walked hunched over. My suggestion

247
00:15:24.279 --> 00:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of an anteriorly set ankle struck him as an even

248
00:15:27.519 --> 00:15:31.559
<v Speaker 1>better explanation for the apparent weight distribution from the thin

249
00:15:31.720 --> 00:15:35.159
<v Speaker 1>and totally flexible lifts. He also deduced that it had

250
00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:39.519
<v Speaker 1>collapsed arches. The depths of the imprints were indicative of

251
00:15:39.600 --> 00:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>great body weight, but exact figures were difficult to calculate.

252
00:15:43.759 --> 00:15:46.799
<v Speaker 1>The tracks were impressed much deeper than the investigator's boots

253
00:15:46.840 --> 00:15:49.639
<v Speaker 1>in despite the fact that they covered over twice the

254
00:15:49.679 --> 00:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>area of these boots. At the location of Freeman's alleged siding,

255
00:15:53.600 --> 00:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the Forest Service conducted a test at the urging of

256
00:15:56.360 --> 00:15:59.759
<v Speaker 1>an individual visiting from Seattle. A piece of metal the

257
00:15:59.759 --> 00:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>side in shape of one of the footprints was cut

258
00:16:02.240 --> 00:16:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and this was placed on the dirt road near a track.

259
00:16:05.399 --> 00:16:07.759
<v Speaker 1>An ettojack was then put on top of it, and

260
00:16:07.840 --> 00:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this was used to raise the rear end of a

261
00:16:09.759 --> 00:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pickup truck. They found that this metal plate was impressed

262
00:16:13.120 --> 00:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>into the ground less than the actual footprints. From this

263
00:16:16.639 --> 00:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>fact and the given weight of the half supported truck,

264
00:16:19.679 --> 00:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle individual concluded the weight of this thing weighed

265
00:16:23.279 --> 00:16:28.039
<v Speaker 1>four thousand pounds or one nine hundred and fourteen kilograms.

266
00:16:28.679 --> 00:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>None of the foresters agreed with this weight, as widely

267
00:16:31.519 --> 00:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>quoted in the press, allowing for only one fourth of

268
00:16:34.519 --> 00:16:39.039
<v Speaker 1>it at most. This excessive weight figure is easily dismissed

269
00:16:39.120 --> 00:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>because it is based on gradual pressing of weight into

270
00:16:42.120 --> 00:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the ground in contrast of the impact of striding. A

271
00:16:46.000 --> 00:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>simple experiment illustrates this one can walk with long and

272
00:16:50.159 --> 00:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>firm strides on fine moist soil, leaving clear footprints, then

273
00:16:54.879 --> 00:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>stop and walk slowly back to examine the prints that

274
00:16:57.759 --> 00:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>were just made. One may then back off off and

275
00:17:00.399 --> 00:17:03.799
<v Speaker 1>compare the striding tracks with the walking tracks and see

276
00:17:03.840 --> 00:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that the latter are far less impressed. I have found

277
00:17:07.279 --> 00:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that in most cases even hard stamping in place will

278
00:17:10.400 --> 00:17:14.599
<v Speaker 1>not match the impressions just previously made in striding. Full

279
00:17:14.640 --> 00:17:18.319
<v Speaker 1>striding impacts the body weight at some speed entirely on

280
00:17:18.440 --> 00:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the heel area initially and with the slight forward motion

281
00:17:22.000 --> 00:17:25.319
<v Speaker 1>as well. In leaving the ground. The body weight is

282
00:17:25.440 --> 00:17:28.279
<v Speaker 1>last impressed on the toe area with the force of

283
00:17:28.279 --> 00:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>stepping off, and also with a slight backward motion. Applying

284
00:17:32.920 --> 00:17:35.319
<v Speaker 1>this knowledge to the tracks in question does not give

285
00:17:35.359 --> 00:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>an exact figure of weight, but it moves the reasonable

286
00:17:38.480 --> 00:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>estimate back to near Freeman's guests of eight hundred to

287
00:17:41.400 --> 00:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>one thousand pounds or about four hundred kilograms. Of course,

288
00:17:45.880 --> 00:17:48.599
<v Speaker 1>this all refers to the first individual from the sighting

289
00:17:48.599 --> 00:17:52.319
<v Speaker 1>event on June tenth. The second individual's tracks found on

290
00:17:52.400 --> 00:17:57.279
<v Speaker 1>June seventeenth were slightly larger and impressed to a similar degree. Thus,

291
00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the tracks that are considered in detail here we are

292
00:18:00.200 --> 00:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>quite possibly pressed into the ground with the weight of

293
00:18:03.000 --> 00:18:07.039
<v Speaker 1>as much as four hundred kilograms. The foot shape is

294
00:18:07.160 --> 00:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially human in spite of the large size and flat arch.

295
00:18:11.240 --> 00:18:14.079
<v Speaker 1>The toes are unusual in being more nearly all the

296
00:18:14.119 --> 00:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>same size than in humans. The first digit is the largest,

297
00:18:17.880 --> 00:18:21.559
<v Speaker 1>but only slightly so. The toes are also arranged nearly

298
00:18:21.559 --> 00:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>straight across the front of the foot. This contrasts with

299
00:18:24.720 --> 00:18:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the more tapered human foot, where the lesser toes are

300
00:18:27.880 --> 00:18:32.799
<v Speaker 1>progressively much shorter. All these characteristics also apply to other

301
00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:37.279
<v Speaker 1>wallow walla footprints, as well as to most reported sasquatch tracks.

302
00:18:38.200 --> 00:18:42.039
<v Speaker 1>The two footprints are especially instructive in respect to differences

303
00:18:42.039 --> 00:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in the depths of toe impression. At the metatarsal ends.

304
00:18:46.279 --> 00:18:50.279
<v Speaker 1>The full right footprint has a deeply impressed digit one,

305
00:18:50.759 --> 00:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>while the short right one, missing a heel, has a

306
00:18:54.039 --> 00:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>more deeply impressed digit two. The toes of short right

307
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>are impressed into the substrate on only slightly less than

308
00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:05.599
<v Speaker 1>the metatarsal ends, but digits two through five of full

309
00:19:05.720 --> 00:19:09.079
<v Speaker 1>right turns somewhat upward and some of the tips are

310
00:19:09.119 --> 00:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>not recorded. This is also evident in digit five of

311
00:19:12.759 --> 00:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the full left, where the arched ridge pattern first taken

312
00:19:16.160 --> 00:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the tip of the toe, actually appears to

313
00:19:18.440 --> 00:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>be from the meta tarsal pad, and the tip does

314
00:19:21.720 --> 00:19:25.759
<v Speaker 1>not show at the metatarsal ends. The full right footprint

315
00:19:25.799 --> 00:19:29.039
<v Speaker 1>has a deeply impressed digit one, while the short right

316
00:19:29.079 --> 00:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>one missing the heel, has a more deeply impressed digit two.

317
00:19:33.519 --> 00:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>A peculiarity of the full left is the extra pad

318
00:19:36.680 --> 00:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of flesh to the lateral side of the base of

319
00:19:39.279 --> 00:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>digit five. Dermal ridges passed directly from digit five onto

320
00:19:43.680 --> 00:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>this pad, so it is not a double strike of

321
00:19:46.279 --> 00:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the fifth digit. Since this pad does not appear on

322
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:53.079
<v Speaker 1>either of the right tracts, its exact nature is not clear.

323
00:19:53.440 --> 00:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It may result from connective tissues in the sole pad

324
00:19:56.200 --> 00:19:59.519
<v Speaker 1>that were under a normal tension. Possibly it is an

325
00:19:59.559 --> 00:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>insipi bient sixth digit. The short right track shows what

326
00:20:03.839 --> 00:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>may be a double strike of a digit, where that

327
00:20:06.079 --> 00:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>toe was first pressed against digit three, then glanced off

328
00:20:09.880 --> 00:20:12.839
<v Speaker 1>of a small stone and into a more normal position.

329
00:20:13.440 --> 00:20:16.079
<v Speaker 1>A cast of that stone is preserved in the track.

330
00:20:16.720 --> 00:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>In order to make such a movement, the digit had

331
00:20:19.160 --> 00:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to shift to the side after it was pressed into

332
00:20:21.480 --> 00:20:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the ground, rolled over the stone, and press in again.

333
00:20:25.640 --> 00:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>The first pressing of digit II against digit three is

334
00:20:28.680 --> 00:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>indicated by the set of five V shaped ridges meeting

335
00:20:32.440 --> 00:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in a cleft. This cleft might also be taken as

336
00:20:35.680 --> 00:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a deep scar between the toes, but this would not

337
00:20:38.519 --> 00:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>explain the apparent two impressions of digit III. Perhaps the

338
00:20:42.680 --> 00:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>most intriguing of these gross characteristics of the prints is

339
00:20:45.880 --> 00:20:49.079
<v Speaker 1>the large stone impression in the middle of the full right.

340
00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:52.519
<v Speaker 1>The stone was photographed in the actual track before the

341
00:20:52.559 --> 00:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>cast was made. It measures about nine centimeters long by

342
00:20:56.240 --> 00:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>seven centimeters wide and stands up into the footprint cast

343
00:21:00.119 --> 00:21:03.319
<v Speaker 1>to a maximum of two centimeters toward the rear part.

344
00:21:04.000 --> 00:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The footprint maker simply stepped on a large stone and

345
00:21:07.440 --> 00:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>pressed it down into the dirt around it on all sides.

346
00:21:11.559 --> 00:21:14.519
<v Speaker 1>This was not a doable action, hitting on one side

347
00:21:14.640 --> 00:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>then twisting over to press down on the other. Such

348
00:21:17.960 --> 00:21:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a double imprinting would have left corresponding breaks in the

349
00:21:20.839 --> 00:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>imprint to the front and rear of the stone, but

350
00:21:23.960 --> 00:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there are none. The significance of this stepped on stone

351
00:21:27.799 --> 00:21:29.839
<v Speaker 1>is that it shows the sole of the foot had

352
00:21:29.880 --> 00:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a very thick padding and that it was also very flexible.

353
00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Mobility of bone connections cannot account for most of this indentation.

354
00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>The deepest part is close enough to the back of

355
00:21:41.039 --> 00:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the foot that only the calcaneous or heel bone is involved.

356
00:21:45.680 --> 00:21:48.079
<v Speaker 1>It is obvious that the sole pad must have had

357
00:21:48.079 --> 00:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a thickness somewhat greater than the two centimeter depth of

358
00:21:51.200 --> 00:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the stone's indentation. This applies to the osteologically more rigid

359
00:21:55.960 --> 00:21:58.599
<v Speaker 1>rear part of the foot, and maybe much the case

360
00:21:58.640 --> 00:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in the forefoot, where there is there more moveability between

361
00:22:01.480 --> 00:22:05.519
<v Speaker 1>the bones. A flexible soule pad is further supported by

362
00:22:05.519 --> 00:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the configuration of the edges of the footprint indentations. These

363
00:22:09.519 --> 00:22:12.799
<v Speaker 1>are nearly vertical in many areas, and actually overhanged by

364
00:22:12.839 --> 00:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as much as one centimeter in one place. This overhang

365
00:22:16.559 --> 00:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>might have been caused by sagging of the surrounding dirt

366
00:22:19.039 --> 00:22:22.799
<v Speaker 1>after the imprints were made, although personal observation of many

367
00:22:22.880 --> 00:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>tracks makes this seem unlikely to me. A rigid structure

368
00:22:26.400 --> 00:22:29.799
<v Speaker 1>could not have pressed laterally against the walls of these impressions,

369
00:22:30.119 --> 00:22:34.759
<v Speaker 1>then withdrawn medially and removal. A flexible foot, especially one

370
00:22:34.880 --> 00:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with a thick sole pad, would make just these movements,

371
00:22:38.480 --> 00:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>leaving an impression that can be wider at the bottom

372
00:22:41.319 --> 00:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>than it is nearer to the top. Detailed skin impressions

373
00:22:45.039 --> 00:22:48.319
<v Speaker 1>are visible on some of these vertical and overhanging walls,

374
00:22:48.640 --> 00:22:51.759
<v Speaker 1>with dermal ridges clearly showing in one case near the

375
00:22:51.799 --> 00:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>heel of the full right. These details are directly imprinted

376
00:22:55.920 --> 00:22:58.559
<v Speaker 1>into the side walls and thus could not have been

377
00:22:58.599 --> 00:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>made by a rigid structure with any combination of movements.

378
00:23:03.000 --> 00:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>The presumption of a thick soul pad was also indicated

379
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>by four foot print cast from Gray's Harbor County, Washington,

380
00:23:10.079 --> 00:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>made earlier in nineteen eighty two by the Gray's Harbor

381
00:23:13.519 --> 00:23:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Sheriff's Department. These tracks show such identity of detail with

382
00:23:17.839 --> 00:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>each other that a single foot was almost surely involved.

383
00:23:21.799 --> 00:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yet they varied in breadth by as much as a

384
00:23:24.640 --> 00:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>centimeter from one print to another. Varying pressure on a thick,

385
00:23:28.720 --> 00:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>flexible soul pad was clearly suggested in that case too.

386
00:23:33.119 --> 00:23:36.279
<v Speaker 1>The logical expectation of such a thick soul pad has

387
00:23:36.359 --> 00:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>long been indicated by the apparent ratio between body weight

388
00:23:39.960 --> 00:23:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and foot structure area. With increasing body size, surfaces increased

389
00:23:44.799 --> 00:23:48.599
<v Speaker 1>by the square linear dimension, while body volume increases by

390
00:23:48.640 --> 00:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the cube. Thus, the larger hominid puts more weight on

391
00:23:52.000 --> 00:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a given area of soul than does a smaller one.

392
00:23:55.720 --> 00:23:59.839
<v Speaker 1>The reported unusually heavy set Sasquatch bodies only add to

393
00:23:59.880 --> 00:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the problem. A typical man one hundred and seventy centimeters

394
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>tall will have a foot twenty six centimeters long. His

395
00:24:07.079 --> 00:24:10.519
<v Speaker 1>sixty five kilogram body weight will be distributed over two

396
00:24:10.640 --> 00:24:14.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred square centimeters of one foot, or about point three

397
00:24:14.440 --> 00:24:19.839
<v Speaker 1>two five kilograms per square centimeter. Our reconstructed sasquatch two

398
00:24:19.839 --> 00:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>point four to two point five meters tall has a

399
00:24:22.960 --> 00:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>foot thirty seven point five centimeters long. Its four hundred

400
00:24:27.240 --> 00:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>kilogram body weight is distributed over four hundred and eighty

401
00:24:31.000 --> 00:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>six square centimeters of one foot, or about point eight

402
00:24:34.920 --> 00:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>two two kilograms per square centimeter. The above figure assumes

403
00:24:39.519 --> 00:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the same ratio of stature to foot length in the

404
00:24:42.079 --> 00:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>human and the sasquatch. Evidence on this point is mixed.

405
00:24:46.759 --> 00:24:49.599
<v Speaker 1>If we follow the measurements estimated from the Patterson Gimlin

406
00:24:49.640 --> 00:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>film of nineteen sixty seven, a thirty seven point five

407
00:24:53.079 --> 00:24:56.759
<v Speaker 1>centimeter foot indicates a smaller sasquatch with a body weight

408
00:24:56.759 --> 00:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of only about two hundred and fifty kilograms. This would

409
00:25:00.079 --> 00:25:03.839
<v Speaker 1>putzo point five one four kilograms on each square centimeter

410
00:25:03.960 --> 00:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of the foot still more than half again as much

411
00:25:07.200 --> 00:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>weight per unit area of the sole of the foot

412
00:25:09.920 --> 00:25:13.839
<v Speaker 1>as a normal human. This is probably the minimum possible figure.

413
00:25:14.160 --> 00:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Such a thick sole pad would presumably be made largely

414
00:25:17.640 --> 00:25:20.519
<v Speaker 1>of fat, but would have to be strongly interlaced with

415
00:25:20.880 --> 00:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and partitioned by connective tissue running in many directions. This

416
00:25:25.759 --> 00:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>design would allow for the retention of typical higher primate

417
00:25:29.480 --> 00:25:35.039
<v Speaker 1>friction skin surface with a minimum of internal restructuring. This conclusion,

418
00:25:35.240 --> 00:25:39.039
<v Speaker 1>which was based only on a sasquatch footprint, morphology and

419
00:25:39.200 --> 00:25:42.519
<v Speaker 1>estimated body sizes, is supported by the data on the

420
00:25:42.519 --> 00:25:47.319
<v Speaker 1>gorilla foot. Raven describes the gorilla soul as follows. The

421
00:25:47.359 --> 00:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>subcutaneous connective tissue is very thick and fatty, and similarly

422
00:25:52.079 --> 00:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>has a framework of heavy collaginous septa. The fatty pad

423
00:25:56.200 --> 00:26:00.039
<v Speaker 1>of the sole is everywhere covered by dense connective tissue.

424
00:26:00.079 --> 00:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The fat is than along the middle of the foot,

425
00:26:02.480 --> 00:26:06.079
<v Speaker 1>but is very thick two point five centimeters under the heel.

426
00:26:06.759 --> 00:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Given that the sasquatch may weigh twice as much as

427
00:26:09.480 --> 00:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the gorilla and is entirely bipedal, it is reasonable to

428
00:26:13.079 --> 00:26:17.839
<v Speaker 1>expect the same soul structure, but to an exaggerated degree.

429
00:26:17.920 --> 00:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I have already alluded to the dermal ridges and sweat

430
00:26:20.519 --> 00:26:23.839
<v Speaker 1>pores that characterize friction skin on the palms and soles

431
00:26:23.839 --> 00:26:28.079
<v Speaker 1>of higher primates and not on other mammals. These ridges

432
00:26:28.119 --> 00:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are clearly evident in the three cast in question. They

433
00:26:31.440 --> 00:26:33.839
<v Speaker 1>cover most of the toe areas and can be seen

434
00:26:33.960 --> 00:26:37.039
<v Speaker 1>in scattered parts of the rest of the soul. From

435
00:26:37.119 --> 00:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>ridge to ridge, these lines are spaced out half a

436
00:26:39.480 --> 00:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>millimeter apart, more in some areas and less than others.

437
00:26:43.720 --> 00:26:47.079
<v Speaker 1>This kind of spacing is typical for almost all higher primates,

438
00:26:47.319 --> 00:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the body size. With a primate species, large

439
00:26:51.480 --> 00:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>individuals have ridges somewhat farther apart than those in smaller individuals.

440
00:26:56.279 --> 00:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>The number of ridges and the fetus is geared to

441
00:26:58.720 --> 00:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the average adult bodies sigei of the species, so those

442
00:27:01.960 --> 00:27:05.079
<v Speaker 1>individuals that grow to larger sizes have the given number

443
00:27:05.160 --> 00:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of ridges more spread out, and vice versa. Friction skin

444
00:27:09.279 --> 00:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>tends to have the optimum density of ridge spacing for

445
00:27:12.240 --> 00:27:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the best adhesion to smooth objects. The number of lines

446
00:27:16.359 --> 00:27:18.759
<v Speaker 1>laid down in the fetus varies according to the adult

447
00:27:18.839 --> 00:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>size for each species. There is no adjustment for sexual

448
00:27:22.799 --> 00:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>size differences. Thus it is not clear where our thirty

449
00:27:26.759 --> 00:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>eight centimeter tracks were deposited by a male or a female.

450
00:27:30.799 --> 00:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>The near constancy of ridge spacing and primates rules out

451
00:27:34.240 --> 00:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>one method of faking latex Molds of real skin soaked

452
00:27:38.359 --> 00:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in kerosene will greatly expand there may also be other

453
00:27:42.200 --> 00:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>methods for expanding molds. This procedure could produce gigantic skin

454
00:27:47.000 --> 00:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>patterns in some respects, but the ridge spacing would also

455
00:27:50.240 --> 00:27:54.799
<v Speaker 1>be expanded and thus easily recognizable as abnormal. The dermal

456
00:27:54.880 --> 00:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>ridges in these tracks show bifurcations, terminations, and isolated short

457
00:27:59.720 --> 00:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sections in various places. These are the same kinds of

458
00:28:03.720 --> 00:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>variations that are seen in human dramatoglyphics, and they occur

459
00:28:07.359 --> 00:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with normal frequencies. If a dormal ridge running across a

460
00:28:11.319 --> 00:28:13.799
<v Speaker 1>toe is counted as one and a ridge of a

461
00:28:13.799 --> 00:28:17.039
<v Speaker 1>similar length on the other sole as another, then these

462
00:28:17.039 --> 00:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>shrick casts display almost a thousand dermal ridges. Each of

463
00:28:21.720 --> 00:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>those that has been carefully observed is a smoothly rounded

464
00:28:25.039 --> 00:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>ridge and cross section, and not a scratch or V

465
00:28:28.160 --> 00:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>shaped groove as would be produced by engraving. The furls

466
00:28:32.240 --> 00:28:35.559
<v Speaker 1>are also rounded valleys between the ridges, and they are

467
00:28:35.599 --> 00:28:39.759
<v Speaker 1>relatively narrow. The spacing between the ridges varies only gradually

468
00:28:39.799 --> 00:28:42.759
<v Speaker 1>from one location to another, and there are no abrupt

469
00:28:42.880 --> 00:28:46.079
<v Speaker 1>breaks in the pattern. Density. Ridges can be seen in

470
00:28:46.119 --> 00:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>some places well off the soul more than two centimeters

471
00:28:49.480 --> 00:28:52.759
<v Speaker 1>of the side of the foot. This shows most clearly

472
00:28:52.880 --> 00:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>around the outside of the heel of the cast of

473
00:28:55.240 --> 00:28:58.599
<v Speaker 1>the full right. The greater extension of the friction skin

474
00:28:58.759 --> 00:29:00.799
<v Speaker 1>up the edge of the foot, as compared with a

475
00:29:00.880 --> 00:29:04.519
<v Speaker 1>much lesser degree on the hand, is normal in primate

476
00:29:04.599 --> 00:29:08.359
<v Speaker 1>dramatic glyphics. These ridges are clearest and with the deepest

477
00:29:08.400 --> 00:29:12.319
<v Speaker 1>relief on those areas that bear the least weight, around

478
00:29:12.319 --> 00:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the edges of the foot itself and around the individual toes.

479
00:29:15.279 --> 00:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>In particular, the skin should normally strike the substrate only briefly.

480
00:29:19.799 --> 00:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>In these areas. Ridge to furrow depths are at a maximum.

481
00:29:23.880 --> 00:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>On the more weight bearing surfaces of the soul and

482
00:29:26.440 --> 00:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the toepads, the ridges appear to be

483
00:29:29.039 --> 00:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhat worn down. This is normal for a primate that

484
00:29:32.240 --> 00:29:35.319
<v Speaker 1>walks a great deal on hard surfaces. I am told

485
00:29:35.319 --> 00:29:39.119
<v Speaker 1>by a primatologist who prefers anonymity that only a big

486
00:29:39.160 --> 00:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>gorilla living in a concrete floored cage would wear down

487
00:29:42.240 --> 00:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>these ridges completely. Interestingly, the footprints at the Freeman site

488
00:29:46.240 --> 00:29:50.119
<v Speaker 1>location the first individual show no ridges except for a

489
00:29:50.160 --> 00:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>few traces around the edges in some places. Perhaps this

490
00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:57.079
<v Speaker 1>individual had done considerably more walking than the second individual

491
00:29:57.400 --> 00:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>being studied here. For more sasquatch Otta see, will be

492
00:30:02.079 --> 00:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>right back after these messages. In the early fetal development

493
00:30:09.000 --> 00:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of dermal ridges, each sweatpoor has a tiny cone or

494
00:30:12.480 --> 00:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>pebble of skin surrounding it. As the growth progresses, these

495
00:30:16.960 --> 00:30:20.039
<v Speaker 1>cones line up in a fixed pattern and merge together

496
00:30:20.160 --> 00:30:24.759
<v Speaker 1>in unbroken ridges. Sometimes this development partially fails, and many

497
00:30:24.799 --> 00:30:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of the ridges consist of only a jumble of very

498
00:30:27.319 --> 00:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>short segments. This condition is known as dysplasia, which tends

499
00:30:31.680 --> 00:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to affect only mostly the central areas of the greatest

500
00:30:34.519 --> 00:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>weight support, where the ridges are the most worn down.

501
00:30:38.200 --> 00:30:42.039
<v Speaker 1>While these two conditions topographically coincide, they should not be

502
00:30:42.079 --> 00:30:47.039
<v Speaker 1>confused because they have separate origins in morphology. In affected areas,

503
00:30:47.200 --> 00:30:50.039
<v Speaker 1>the directions of dermal ridge sets can still be made

504
00:30:50.079 --> 00:30:53.599
<v Speaker 1>out by observing the general trend of orientation of the

505
00:30:53.640 --> 00:30:58.079
<v Speaker 1>short segments. Our second individual shows this form of dysplasia,

506
00:30:58.359 --> 00:31:01.759
<v Speaker 1>as it occasionally occurs in humans. The pattern in some

507
00:31:01.920 --> 00:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>toe tips and over the fore part of the soul

508
00:31:04.599 --> 00:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat confused and hard to follow. Nevertheless, the trend

509
00:31:08.480 --> 00:31:11.359
<v Speaker 1>on this one recorded instance of a mid soul print

510
00:31:11.440 --> 00:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is transversely across the soul. This is the hominid pattern

511
00:31:15.559 --> 00:31:18.279
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the podids, where the trend in this

512
00:31:18.440 --> 00:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>area is diagonally from anterior medial to posterior lateral. This

513
00:31:24.279 --> 00:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>contrast should be used with caution because apes show high variability,

514
00:31:28.519 --> 00:31:31.319
<v Speaker 1>and some of them approach the human orientation in parts

515
00:31:31.359 --> 00:31:35.759
<v Speaker 1>of the soul. The first Freeman citing individual soul was

516
00:31:35.799 --> 00:31:40.079
<v Speaker 1>too torn to determine if it showed dysplasia In at

517
00:31:40.160 --> 00:31:43.839
<v Speaker 1>least one place, the ridge trend abruptly changes direction with

518
00:31:43.920 --> 00:31:47.839
<v Speaker 1>no apparent reason. While this is puzzled three examiners, it

519
00:31:47.920 --> 00:31:51.599
<v Speaker 1>is actually a perfectly normal phenomenon, though rare. This is

520
00:31:51.640 --> 00:31:56.079
<v Speaker 1>another form of dysplasia or dissociation of dermal ridges, and

521
00:31:56.279 --> 00:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is discussed by Olson in nineteen seventy eight. Even more

522
00:32:00.000 --> 00:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>moor extreme examples have been reported in palm prints. In

523
00:32:03.680 --> 00:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>one human case, a one centimeter circle patch sharply outlined,

524
00:32:08.200 --> 00:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>has its ridges turned ninety degrees from those on the

525
00:32:11.240 --> 00:32:15.119
<v Speaker 1>surrounding skin. The ridge alignment is slightly broken up on

526
00:32:15.200 --> 00:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>some toe tips, but the basic print pattern can still

527
00:32:17.960 --> 00:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>be determined. The toe tip patterns are mostly arches, while

528
00:32:22.160 --> 00:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>digit I of the full left appears to have a loop.

529
00:32:26.039 --> 00:32:30.039
<v Speaker 1>On the fingerprints. Arches occur rarely in humans, showing in

530
00:32:30.119 --> 00:32:34.319
<v Speaker 1>just over ten percent of individuals only among Congo pigmies

531
00:32:34.400 --> 00:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and South African bushmen. On the toes, they occur somewhat

532
00:32:38.440 --> 00:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>more frequently, but they're still in the minority. On the

533
00:32:42.160 --> 00:32:44.599
<v Speaker 1>shafts of the toes, the ridge pattern begins to follow

534
00:32:44.640 --> 00:32:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the primate norm of running straight across at the basis

535
00:32:48.359 --> 00:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of the toes, which are surprisingly short. New patterns again

536
00:32:51.680 --> 00:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can be seen on the metatarsal pads. None of these

537
00:32:54.720 --> 00:32:57.519
<v Speaker 1>can be followed through clearly in their entirety, but an

538
00:32:57.640 --> 00:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>arching design is the most common in the distal areas

539
00:33:00.480 --> 00:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of these pads. The best cast, the full left, seems

540
00:33:04.480 --> 00:33:07.039
<v Speaker 1>to show the beginnings of a loop pattern at the

541
00:33:07.039 --> 00:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>base of digit two and perhaps on digit one, while

542
00:33:10.440 --> 00:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>digit five simply arches. As far as the lines can

543
00:33:13.519 --> 00:33:17.759
<v Speaker 1>be traced. These are normal patterns for apes or humans.

544
00:33:18.640 --> 00:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>In addition to being unusually short for such a foot size.

545
00:33:22.400 --> 00:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>The toes show another peculiarity that does not occur in

546
00:33:25.519 --> 00:33:30.079
<v Speaker 1>primeate feet. They have no flexion creases. Ideally, there should

547
00:33:30.119 --> 00:33:33.279
<v Speaker 1>be three such creases, each corresponding to one of the

548
00:33:33.319 --> 00:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>three felangel joints, but in this case none are visible.

549
00:33:37.680 --> 00:33:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I do not know how to interpret this absence, except

550
00:33:40.400 --> 00:33:43.039
<v Speaker 1>to make note of it. It may not be a

551
00:33:43.119 --> 00:33:46.839
<v Speaker 1>normal sasquatch trait because the toes on this particular individual

552
00:33:46.880 --> 00:33:51.559
<v Speaker 1>are relatively even shorter than on the other presumed sasquatch footprints.

553
00:33:52.359 --> 00:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>The main significance for now may relate to the possibility

554
00:33:55.720 --> 00:33:59.119
<v Speaker 1>of these tracks being faked with lifts and cast from

555
00:33:59.240 --> 00:34:02.759
<v Speaker 1>real primate tie skin. How does one locate a group

556
00:34:02.799 --> 00:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of people with arch thumbs of various sizes and uniformly short,

557
00:34:07.400 --> 00:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>with none of them showing any flexion creases. While there

558
00:34:10.840 --> 00:34:14.199
<v Speaker 1>are many pattern breaks with large blank areas on the soles,

559
00:34:14.599 --> 00:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the toe prints are continuous from tips to

560
00:34:17.000 --> 00:34:21.559
<v Speaker 1>the metatarsal pads. No patching is indicated. I could find

561
00:34:21.639 --> 00:34:24.159
<v Speaker 1>only one case in the literature of a human finger

562
00:34:24.239 --> 00:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>without flexion creases. Haylock nineteen eighty three illustrates one Brachydactylus

563
00:34:29.880 --> 00:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>individual where a very short digit II lacks creases and

564
00:34:33.960 --> 00:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>has a continuous arch pattern from the tip to the

565
00:34:36.760 --> 00:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>metacarpal end. Dermal ridges were first suspected on a cast

566
00:34:41.039 --> 00:34:44.039
<v Speaker 1>of a handprint ascribed to a Sasquatch that was recovered

567
00:34:44.079 --> 00:34:49.079
<v Speaker 1>in northeastern Washington in nineteen seventy. In this case, parallel

568
00:34:49.119 --> 00:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ridges were evident on the edge of one finger near

569
00:34:51.840 --> 00:34:55.679
<v Speaker 1>the tip. They were spaced about one millimeters apart, thus

570
00:34:55.719 --> 00:35:00.760
<v Speaker 1>making their identification as dermal ridges somewhat uncertain. Other footprint

571
00:35:00.840 --> 00:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>casts have been sought out and examined since the walla

572
00:35:03.440 --> 00:35:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Wall of Discovery, but nothing more than suggestive traces could

573
00:35:07.320 --> 00:35:10.639
<v Speaker 1>be found in a few cases. This is not surprising

574
00:35:10.679 --> 00:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the fortunate and rare circumstances in this instance.

575
00:35:14.800 --> 00:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>In many places in the specimens considered here, one can

576
00:35:18.039 --> 00:35:22.559
<v Speaker 1>see small indentations or pores located along the ridges. These

577
00:35:22.559 --> 00:35:25.559
<v Speaker 1>are typically spaced out about half a millimeter apart and

578
00:35:25.639 --> 00:35:29.039
<v Speaker 1>are centered on the ridges. They vary in size from

579
00:35:29.079 --> 00:35:32.559
<v Speaker 1>barely visible to less than point one millimeter up to

580
00:35:32.639 --> 00:35:37.159
<v Speaker 1>a diameter of point two millimeters. The ridges visibly widen

581
00:35:37.280 --> 00:35:40.639
<v Speaker 1>around each of these poores. This is most clearly seen

582
00:35:40.679 --> 00:35:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at the base of digit I of the full left track.

583
00:35:44.159 --> 00:35:47.599
<v Speaker 1>The margins of these pores curve gradually inwards to the centers.

584
00:35:48.159 --> 00:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>There is not a sharp edge. Several forensic specialists who

585
00:35:51.760 --> 00:35:55.280
<v Speaker 1>have examined this material agree that these are sweat poors.

586
00:35:56.079 --> 00:35:59.639
<v Speaker 1>The sweat poors are generally lined up regularly on adjacent

587
00:35:59.679 --> 00:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>dermal ridges, as opposed to having alternative or random positions.

588
00:36:04.519 --> 00:36:08.559
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the pores also occur along lines drawn

589
00:36:08.599 --> 00:36:12.280
<v Speaker 1>perpendicular to the ridges. This pattern is not regular, but

590
00:36:12.400 --> 00:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it is a strong tendency, just as in human dramaticglythics.

591
00:36:17.280 --> 00:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>The possibility that air bubbles might have mimicked sweat poors

592
00:36:20.559 --> 00:36:24.519
<v Speaker 1>was suggested by physical anthropologist Tim White at the University

593
00:36:24.519 --> 00:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of California, Berkeley, who otherwise thought the cast appeared to

594
00:36:27.880 --> 00:36:32.159
<v Speaker 1>represent legitimate footprints. To settle this point, I made impressions

595
00:36:32.400 --> 00:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of false ridges in similar soil and cast them in plaster.

596
00:36:36.800 --> 00:36:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I compared the results with the actual cast and found

597
00:36:39.239 --> 00:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that they are in fact occasional air bubbles from casting.

598
00:36:43.920 --> 00:36:47.079
<v Speaker 1>These bubbles, however, are sharp edged and are not as

599
00:36:47.119 --> 00:36:50.800
<v Speaker 1>small as the apparent sweat poors. They are rather few

600
00:36:50.840 --> 00:36:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and not regularly spaced or lined up. In some cases,

601
00:36:54.199 --> 00:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they also bulge out of the ridges around them, but

602
00:36:56.920 --> 00:37:00.079
<v Speaker 1>only slightly, and with a much thinner wall between the

603
00:37:00.119 --> 00:37:04.559
<v Speaker 1>hole in the ridge edge than the presumed pores. One

604
00:37:04.599 --> 00:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint expert with the Vancouver, BC Police Department pointed out

605
00:37:08.400 --> 00:37:12.159
<v Speaker 1>that sweat poors often have irregular edges, while these poors

606
00:37:12.199 --> 00:37:16.639
<v Speaker 1>sometimes appear quite circular. This discrepancy results from the method

607
00:37:16.679 --> 00:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of observation. Inked fingerprints used by law enforcement agencies record

608
00:37:21.480 --> 00:37:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the very outermost edges of the poores, and these are

609
00:37:24.679 --> 00:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>usually not quite circular. Photographs of many of these cast

610
00:37:28.800 --> 00:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>poors show only shadows thrown deeper into the holes, where

611
00:37:32.960 --> 00:37:37.159
<v Speaker 1>active sweat pours are in fact perfectly rounded. Others with

612
00:37:37.239 --> 00:37:43.199
<v Speaker 1>more oblique illumination show the typical irregularities of outline. Thus far,

613
00:37:43.400 --> 00:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>every specialist who has examined these casts agree that their

614
00:37:46.880 --> 00:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>detailed anatomy has all the characteristics and appearance of being

615
00:37:50.400 --> 00:37:54.559
<v Speaker 1>derived from an imprint of primate skin. These now include

616
00:37:54.639 --> 00:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty police fingerprint workers, mostly from the Western States, twelve

617
00:37:59.000 --> 00:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of whom who might be considered experts. Also included are

618
00:38:02.920 --> 00:38:06.760
<v Speaker 1>six physical anthropologists with expertise in this area, as well

619
00:38:06.800 --> 00:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>as four pathologists and two zoologists. At present, two of

620
00:38:11.480 --> 00:38:14.519
<v Speaker 1>the police experts are willing to state categorically that the

621
00:38:14.559 --> 00:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>prince actually represent the existence of a real but unknown animal,

622
00:38:19.000 --> 00:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the implications. Interestingly, these two are not only

623
00:38:23.360 --> 00:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>among the most highly qualified, they are also two who

624
00:38:26.519 --> 00:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>have studied the material more thoroughly. Even the strongest critic,

625
00:38:30.599 --> 00:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a mammalogist at the Smithsonian Institute, agrees that the cast

626
00:38:34.000 --> 00:38:36.800
<v Speaker 1>represent primate skin, but he thinks that it must have

627
00:38:36.800 --> 00:38:40.679
<v Speaker 1>been transferred from known animals by silicone rubber casting and

628
00:38:40.760 --> 00:38:44.679
<v Speaker 1>combined somehow to form the tracks. His examination of the

629
00:38:44.719 --> 00:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>cast was brief. Another strong critic, a leading medical authority

630
00:38:48.880 --> 00:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>on skin and the Pacific Northwest, also agreed that the

631
00:38:51.920 --> 00:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>impressions were undoubtedly of primate friction skin, but left open

632
00:38:56.280 --> 00:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the question of how they came to be located on

633
00:38:59.039 --> 00:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>these tracks. His examination of the cast was somewhat longer.

634
00:39:03.480 --> 00:39:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Neither of these experts attempted to specify the source of

635
00:39:06.119 --> 00:39:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the skin that might have been transferred to these tracks.

636
00:39:09.719 --> 00:39:12.519
<v Speaker 1>In their gross anatomy, these tracks could not have been

637
00:39:12.559 --> 00:39:15.639
<v Speaker 1>made by any known animal. They are too large to

638
00:39:15.679 --> 00:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>be human, and the length and stride and depth of

639
00:39:18.280 --> 00:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the imprinting are also beyond human capability. Human feet do

640
00:39:22.920 --> 00:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>not have the flexibility of soul to conform to the

641
00:39:25.800 --> 00:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>large stone that was stepped on. In one case. The

642
00:39:29.079 --> 00:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>toe design is also above the range of human feet

643
00:39:32.199 --> 00:39:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that they are relatively too short toes

644
00:39:35.400 --> 00:39:38.199
<v Speaker 1>two through five or two wide, and they line up

645
00:39:38.239 --> 00:39:40.519
<v Speaker 1>too nearly straight across to the front of the foot.

646
00:39:41.519 --> 00:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>For all the above reasons, no ape foot comes anywhere

647
00:39:45.039 --> 00:39:49.119
<v Speaker 1>near matching these casts. In addition, all apes show some

648
00:39:49.159 --> 00:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>degree of apposability of the first digit, which is not

649
00:39:52.440 --> 00:39:56.159
<v Speaker 1>seen in these casts. The lack of a longitudinal arch

650
00:39:56.159 --> 00:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in these feet, interestingly, is not an argument against either

651
00:39:59.559 --> 00:40:03.559
<v Speaker 1>human or or ape identification. Bear feet can easily be

652
00:40:03.639 --> 00:40:07.760
<v Speaker 1>eliminated on gross anatomy. Again, these tracks are too large

653
00:40:07.800 --> 00:40:10.159
<v Speaker 1>for the hind foot of any bear, in which the

654
00:40:10.199 --> 00:40:12.760
<v Speaker 1>first toe is the shortest and the third toe is

655
00:40:12.800 --> 00:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the longest. Bear tracks also generally show claw marks and

656
00:40:17.440 --> 00:40:21.639
<v Speaker 1>have especially narrow heels. No other animal feet need seriously

657
00:40:21.719 --> 00:40:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be considered. There are only two possible explanations to account

658
00:40:26.320 --> 00:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>for these footprints short of denying their existence. Either they

659
00:40:30.400 --> 00:40:34.079
<v Speaker 1>were fabricated somehow by a modern human hoaxer, or else

660
00:40:34.159 --> 00:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they are tracks of a presently unrecognized animal previous studies

661
00:40:38.880 --> 00:40:41.159
<v Speaker 1>have already dealt with most of the problems that would

662
00:40:41.159 --> 00:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>face any potential hoaxer of these tracks, like in terms

663
00:40:44.519 --> 00:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of their physical circumstances, they need only to be listed

664
00:40:48.000 --> 00:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>here in this case as reminders. The hoaxer had to

665
00:40:51.840 --> 00:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>penetrate a watershed area that is closed to the public

666
00:40:55.119 --> 00:40:58.199
<v Speaker 1>by the US Forest Apartment. This would have to be

667
00:40:58.239 --> 00:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>done without leaving any noticed evavidence of vehicles or human

668
00:41:01.360 --> 00:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>footprints into or out of the area. The unlikelihood of

669
00:41:05.480 --> 00:41:08.320
<v Speaker 1>these tracks being discovered at least suggests that dozens or

670
00:41:08.440 --> 00:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of sets of these tracks must have been made

671
00:41:11.440 --> 00:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in order to ensure the discovery of at least some

672
00:41:13.880 --> 00:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of them. The long stride, commonly one point two meters,

673
00:41:17.800 --> 00:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is difficult to manage even without big fake feet. Stepping

674
00:41:22.000 --> 00:41:24.039
<v Speaker 1>once on the heel while coming down a two meter

675
00:41:24.159 --> 00:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>embankment should have toppled any hoaxer on his face at

676
00:41:27.400 --> 00:41:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the bottom. The depth of imprint means that even if

677
00:41:30.719 --> 00:41:33.599
<v Speaker 1>the hoaxer weighed one hundred and fifty kilograms, he was

678
00:41:33.639 --> 00:41:37.159
<v Speaker 1>carrying an additional weight of maybe two hundred kilograms and

679
00:41:37.280 --> 00:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>still managing long strides. He also managed to walk for

680
00:41:41.599 --> 00:41:44.800
<v Speaker 1>at least three quarters of a mile with all this equipment.

681
00:41:45.239 --> 00:41:47.519
<v Speaker 1>That is how far the search and rescue team from

682
00:41:47.559 --> 00:41:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Oregon was able to backtrack. The first individual accounting for

683
00:41:51.719 --> 00:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the gross morphology of these tracks presents an equally baffling

684
00:41:55.039 --> 00:41:59.039
<v Speaker 1>set of obstacles. The hypothetical hoaxer somehow knew how to

685
00:41:59.079 --> 00:42:02.199
<v Speaker 1>make the soul's fly at the toes short and wide,

686
00:42:02.519 --> 00:42:06.119
<v Speaker 1>with only a modest emphasis on digit one, the forefoot

687
00:42:06.199 --> 00:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>almost squared off, and the heel abnormally wide. These would

688
00:42:10.880 --> 00:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>not have been too difficult to execute if some of

689
00:42:13.400 --> 00:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>my published descriptions of tracks were consulted. But he also

690
00:42:17.079 --> 00:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>knew enough to introduce two other variations that I noted

691
00:42:20.280 --> 00:42:23.639
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen seventy. These have never been written down

692
00:42:24.039 --> 00:42:28.679
<v Speaker 1>nor told to anyone. Some innovations added here include the

693
00:42:28.719 --> 00:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>apparent double strike of one toe that must have been

694
00:42:31.400 --> 00:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult to manage. One cannot help but wondering why the

695
00:42:34.920 --> 00:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>extra pad of flesh was included next to digit five

696
00:42:38.119 --> 00:42:41.119
<v Speaker 1>of the full left track, which looks almost like an

697
00:42:41.119 --> 00:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>incipient sixth digit. The deep indentation in mid soul of

698
00:42:45.760 --> 00:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the full right track shows a surprising degree of flexibility

699
00:42:48.920 --> 00:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of the foot and thick cushioning. How the hoax are

700
00:42:51.920 --> 00:42:54.679
<v Speaker 1>managed to walk on top of these flexible pads is

701
00:42:54.719 --> 00:42:58.039
<v Speaker 1>another problem, unless he was long accustomed to doing this.

702
00:42:58.920 --> 00:43:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Earlier descriptions of authentic seeming sasquatch tracks often included the

703
00:43:03.360 --> 00:43:07.320
<v Speaker 1>double ball. This is seen clearly in the partial left track,

704
00:43:07.639 --> 00:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but for various reasons, it did not show up in

705
00:43:09.840 --> 00:43:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the other two tracks. Differences in the relative depths of

706
00:43:13.320 --> 00:43:17.639
<v Speaker 1>imprinting of the metatarsal pads between the tracks require some explanation,

707
00:43:18.360 --> 00:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>perhaps separately articulated pseudo bones and faked feet. Also, different

708
00:43:24.280 --> 00:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>inclinations of the toes between the two right feet imply

709
00:43:27.480 --> 00:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>still more structural complexity in the feet. The hoaxing problems

710
00:43:32.519 --> 00:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>recounted up to now strain the imagination. Yet similar circumstances

711
00:43:37.320 --> 00:43:40.519
<v Speaker 1>have been reported by reliable observers many times in the past,

712
00:43:40.880 --> 00:43:44.639
<v Speaker 1>for which no good explanation has been forthcoming. The usual

713
00:43:44.639 --> 00:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>approach of the debunkers is to simply ignore the situation,

714
00:43:48.199 --> 00:43:51.159
<v Speaker 1>or to insist that the facts have not been correctly reported.

715
00:43:51.800 --> 00:43:55.639
<v Speaker 1>When the actual tracks have eroded away and memories have faded,

716
00:43:56.079 --> 00:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>all that remain is some big plaster casts. Little argument

717
00:43:59.880 --> 00:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is left in this case. However, the three plaster cast

718
00:44:03.920 --> 00:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>show a degree of detailed anatomy that cannot be dismissed

719
00:44:06.920 --> 00:44:11.159
<v Speaker 1>so easily. The supposed track hoaxer somehow managed to include

720
00:44:11.440 --> 00:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>microscopic detail that matches the foot skin of higher primates.

721
00:44:16.239 --> 00:44:19.519
<v Speaker 1>These are clearly formed dermal ridges with sweat pores over

722
00:44:19.679 --> 00:44:23.400
<v Speaker 1>large parts of these three imprints. These details are of

723
00:44:23.440 --> 00:44:27.079
<v Speaker 1>the correct size, shape, and orientation in each area for

724
00:44:27.199 --> 00:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>gigantic commonid feet. Some peculiarities include arched toe tip prints

725
00:44:32.960 --> 00:44:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and very short toes that lack flexion creases. All possible

726
00:44:37.400 --> 00:44:41.039
<v Speaker 1>sources of primate friction skin have been considered and none

727
00:44:41.119 --> 00:44:45.079
<v Speaker 1>can account for these characteristics. In addition, the hoaxer had

728
00:44:45.079 --> 00:44:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the ridge relief slightly worn down in exactly the areas

729
00:44:48.280 --> 00:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>where the most weight would be supported on the feet

730
00:44:50.960 --> 00:44:55.679
<v Speaker 1>of this size and design. Finally, the incomplete pattern formation

731
00:44:55.800 --> 00:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of dysplasia occurs on just the areas where it would

732
00:44:59.360 --> 00:45:02.760
<v Speaker 1>be normal for feet and toes of this size. Our

733
00:45:02.880 --> 00:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>track maker is an excellent outdoorsman of incredible size and strength.

734
00:45:07.360 --> 00:45:10.599
<v Speaker 1>He is able to move about largely unseen over vast

735
00:45:10.679 --> 00:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>wilderness areas, leaving many tracks and stay tuned for more

736
00:45:15.920 --> 00:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sasquatchy ott to see We'll be right back after these messages.

737
00:45:22.880 --> 00:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>He does not depend on vehicles to get in and

738
00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:27.840
<v Speaker 1>out of these areas where these tracks are found. He

739
00:45:27.920 --> 00:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is able to imprint the ground with tracks that are

740
00:45:30.440 --> 00:45:34.519
<v Speaker 1>anatomically correct for a gigantic combinid, and he is able

741
00:45:34.559 --> 00:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to leave on occasion clear impressions of primate friction skin.

742
00:45:39.480 --> 00:45:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Such a track maker is not really impossible, just not

743
00:45:43.159 --> 00:45:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens. After removing any possibility of a human hoaxer,

744
00:45:48.440 --> 00:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>we can consider these footprints on face value. Using only

745
00:45:52.320 --> 00:45:56.079
<v Speaker 1>the three prime foot prints described above, the track maker

746
00:45:56.119 --> 00:45:59.760
<v Speaker 1>can be reconstructed as follows. The skin makes it a

747
00:45:59.840 --> 00:46:04.800
<v Speaker 1>high primate without specifying monkey, ape or man. It is

748
00:46:04.840 --> 00:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>bipedal and thus with upright posture. The stride indicates a

749
00:46:09.480 --> 00:46:12.280
<v Speaker 1>stature of almost two and a half meters if it

750
00:46:12.320 --> 00:46:15.800
<v Speaker 1>has a human body leg ter ratio where stature is

751
00:46:15.840 --> 00:46:19.559
<v Speaker 1>twice the striding gait. A body weight of about four

752
00:46:19.599 --> 00:46:23.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred kilograms is consistent with the depth of impressions and

753
00:46:23.199 --> 00:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with the indicated soul cushioning pad. The stature and body

754
00:46:27.000 --> 00:46:29.760
<v Speaker 1>weight would indicate a body build much more heavy set

755
00:46:29.800 --> 00:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>than is usual for humans. The short toes, non diverging

756
00:46:33.960 --> 00:46:38.679
<v Speaker 1>first digit, and transverse mid soul ridges all indicate a hominid,

757
00:46:39.440 --> 00:46:43.639
<v Speaker 1>a member of the zoological family homenity that includes humans.

758
00:46:44.639 --> 00:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Granting the hominid status, it would have broad shoulders like

759
00:46:48.000 --> 00:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>any exbrachiator. One could also presume from the track locations

760
00:46:53.159 --> 00:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and the lack of communications between them and ourselves that

761
00:46:56.519 --> 00:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>they are not human in any cognitive and social meanings

762
00:46:59.760 --> 00:47:03.559
<v Speaker 1>of the word. The above description is consistent with Paul

763
00:47:03.599 --> 00:47:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Freeman's sighting report of the animal that started this particular investigation.

764
00:47:08.280 --> 00:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Many hundreds of other people have described seeing essentially the

765
00:47:11.360 --> 00:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>same kind of biped All such reports also include reference

766
00:47:15.320 --> 00:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to a full covering of body hair, usually dark brown

767
00:47:18.360 --> 00:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in color. This might be a reasonable expectation for a

768
00:47:21.960 --> 00:47:26.559
<v Speaker 1>non human higher primate, especially in a temperate climate. Most

769
00:47:26.559 --> 00:47:30.159
<v Speaker 1>observers say the arms are relatively longer than is usual

770
00:47:30.199 --> 00:47:34.039
<v Speaker 1>for humans. They are also massive, especially at the shoulders.

771
00:47:34.800 --> 00:47:37.199
<v Speaker 1>It is often noted that the head is set low,

772
00:47:37.400 --> 00:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>with no constriction showing at the neck. The face is

773
00:47:40.760 --> 00:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>described as being nearly flat, with a little muzzle projection

774
00:47:44.519 --> 00:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and with deep set eyes under projecting browridges. It has

775
00:47:49.039 --> 00:47:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a head that rises only gradually behind the brows to

776
00:47:52.360 --> 00:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a low peak towards the rear. These last name traits

777
00:47:56.440 --> 00:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are entirely consistent with the animal described from the footprints.

778
00:48:00.760 --> 00:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It does not automatically follow that our track maker has

779
00:48:03.519 --> 00:48:06.360
<v Speaker 1>all these additional traits, but it would be a most

780
00:48:06.440 --> 00:48:11.639
<v Speaker 1>peculiar situation if it did not. That possibility would presuppose

781
00:48:11.719 --> 00:48:15.039
<v Speaker 1>the existence of a giant hominid that leaves footprints and

782
00:48:15.079 --> 00:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>has never been seen, and another species of giant, hairy,

783
00:48:18.880 --> 00:48:22.760
<v Speaker 1>guerrilla faced hominid that has often been reported, but which

784
00:48:22.840 --> 00:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>leaves no footprints. The simplest resolution to this is that

785
00:48:27.000 --> 00:48:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the footprints and descriptions may be ascribed to the same animal.

786
00:48:31.400 --> 00:48:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It may seem as though a large edifice has been

787
00:48:33.800 --> 00:48:36.599
<v Speaker 1>erected on the base of just three footprints that were

788
00:48:36.639 --> 00:48:39.400
<v Speaker 1>cast in plaster by the US four at Service in

789
00:48:39.480 --> 00:48:43.679
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty two. Actually the edifice has been there all along,

790
00:48:44.360 --> 00:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>based on many hundreds, perhaps thousands, of footprint events and

791
00:48:48.320 --> 00:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>observations accumulating for over a century. The fact that direct,

792
00:48:52.960 --> 00:48:56.320
<v Speaker 1>substantial proof of the animal has not been produced, combined

793
00:48:56.360 --> 00:48:58.519
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that a proportion of the evidence has

794
00:48:58.559 --> 00:49:02.679
<v Speaker 1>been demonstrated to be fault, has led most biological scientists

795
00:49:02.760 --> 00:49:06.599
<v Speaker 1>to deny the existence of the species. One prominent physical

796
00:49:06.599 --> 00:49:09.639
<v Speaker 1>anthropologist has told me that if these tracks with the

797
00:49:09.639 --> 00:49:13.599
<v Speaker 1>first and only evidence available, the animal would likely be accepted,

798
00:49:14.480 --> 00:49:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but as it is, with so much publicity and fakery

799
00:49:17.480 --> 00:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>known and suspected in the past, such acceptance will not occur.

800
00:49:22.239 --> 00:49:25.079
<v Speaker 1>It has been far easier for most scientists to assume

801
00:49:25.119 --> 00:49:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that all the evidence is false than it is to

802
00:49:27.800 --> 00:49:31.440
<v Speaker 1>believe that a giant hominid has eluded verification for this

803
00:49:31.559 --> 00:49:35.320
<v Speaker 1>longer time. The evidence of these three track casts has

804
00:49:35.360 --> 00:49:38.760
<v Speaker 1>been presented to many experts in the appropriate fields. The

805
00:49:38.880 --> 00:49:43.199
<v Speaker 1>reactions of two major groups are significantly different. In the

806
00:49:43.239 --> 00:49:47.280
<v Speaker 1>fields of physical anthropology and zoology, most of the responses

807
00:49:47.320 --> 00:49:50.639
<v Speaker 1>have ranged from mild interest to flat denial that they

808
00:49:50.679 --> 00:49:55.519
<v Speaker 1>could be real. Among fingerprint experts and palaeontologists, the results

809
00:49:55.559 --> 00:50:00.559
<v Speaker 1>have ranged from mild interest to enthusiastic acceptance. To most

810
00:50:00.639 --> 00:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>anthropologists and zoologists, the implications of these tracks, if authentic,

811
00:50:04.760 --> 00:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are profound. It would mean that their sciences have completely

812
00:50:09.000 --> 00:50:12.239
<v Speaker 1>missed one of the biggest and potentially most important mammalian

813
00:50:12.280 --> 00:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>species on Earth. They may even fear that the public

814
00:50:15.800 --> 00:50:18.599
<v Speaker 1>might ask if they were so wrong in this case,

815
00:50:19.079 --> 00:50:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what else might they be overlooking? I have heard of

816
00:50:22.360 --> 00:50:25.679
<v Speaker 1>instances in which scientists have sincerely expressed the hope that

817
00:50:25.760 --> 00:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sasquatch will never be proven exactly because of these implications.

818
00:50:30.519 --> 00:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It has also been suggested that anthropologists are still smarting

819
00:50:33.880 --> 00:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>from the expose of the pilt Down hoax, and that

820
00:50:37.039 --> 00:50:40.679
<v Speaker 1>their public image would be severely damaged by another such instance.

821
00:50:41.400 --> 00:50:44.079
<v Speaker 1>To them, I need only point out how almost all

822
00:50:44.159 --> 00:50:48.519
<v Speaker 1>geologists firmly oppose the idea of continental drift. Until the

823
00:50:48.599 --> 00:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>late nineteen sixties they survived. Police finger printers and pathologists

824
00:50:54.480 --> 00:50:56.760
<v Speaker 1>generally have no stake in whether or not such a

825
00:50:56.760 --> 00:51:00.760
<v Speaker 1>creature exists. It's outside their normal area of conscers, and

826
00:51:00.800 --> 00:51:04.360
<v Speaker 1>few have made any past pronouncements on the subject. They

827
00:51:04.480 --> 00:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>risk no professional embarrassment by its demonstration. If anything, they

828
00:51:09.039 --> 00:51:11.519
<v Speaker 1>might be more concerned about the possibility that a hoaxer

829
00:51:11.559 --> 00:51:15.639
<v Speaker 1>has developed a technique that can be used to fake fingerprints.

830
00:51:16.320 --> 00:51:18.559
<v Speaker 1>The evidence of this new set of tracks should be

831
00:51:18.599 --> 00:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>treated as conclusively by all authorities, but it is not.

832
00:51:23.239 --> 00:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>If and when a sasquatch skeleton or fresh specimen is recovered,

833
00:51:26.920 --> 00:51:30.119
<v Speaker 1>it would require little intelligence to conclude that the species

834
00:51:30.440 --> 00:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>has existed all along. What does require some reasoning power

835
00:51:35.000 --> 00:51:37.679
<v Speaker 1>is to move from the presently available data to a

836
00:51:37.760 --> 00:51:41.559
<v Speaker 1>clear conclusion as to either the method of hoaxing or

837
00:51:41.599 --> 00:51:43.559
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the animal.

838
00:51:45.039 --> 00:51:50.320
<v Speaker 2>They say, you don't have a go, but you can't stays.

839
00:52:00.159 --> 00:52:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Sid steps, still.

840
00:52:21.400 --> 00:52:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Trying this joy that chid everything call me ride back,

841
00:52:26.880 --> 00:52:34.239
<v Speaker 4>riding back, joy from me, joy staying right came it

842
00:52:34.480 --> 00:53:25.159
<v Speaker 4>right away, Still still stays sssst not not not not

843
00:53:26.760 --> 00:53:29.519
<v Speaker 4>do about.

844
00:53:33.519 --> 00:53:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Names stssts things used these things
