Speaker 1: It's the perfect end to your day.
Speaker 2: Jesse Kelly on seventy ten woor the Jesse Kelly Joe,
Speaker 2: Let's have some fun on a Thursday, A magnificent Thursday. Smile.
Speaker 2: We are almost at the end of the week. We
Speaker 2: are beating up the communists in the media, and that's
Speaker 2: a real good time. We're gonna discuss that tonight. We're
Speaker 2: gonna discuss dealing with the media, dealing with the lies,
Speaker 2: dealing with the communists because this lying that CNN's been
Speaker 2: doing actually provides us a great example of how to
Speaker 2: deal with these people and how to not deal with
Speaker 2: these people. That'll be a good time. We'll talk about
Speaker 2: Joe Biden's auto pen because of an next Biden official
Speaker 2: that just gave some testimony about it. We're gonna talk
Speaker 2: about how the communists, journalists himself, We're going to do
Speaker 2: emails to communists, are after your kids. All that and
Speaker 2: so much more coming up on the world famous Jesse
Speaker 2: Kelly Show. And before I forget halfway through next hour,
Speaker 2: Ryan Gurdusky's gonna join us. You know, Ryan Gradusky, I
Speaker 2: don't have any guests, but I love Ryan. He did
Speaker 2: a big analysis of the twenty twenty four election, who voted?
Speaker 2: How and why? We just had a big report come out.
Speaker 2: Ryan is gonna break it down for us. We're gonna
Speaker 2: nerd out on some details, and then we'll move on
Speaker 2: to other things. All right, And before I forget tomorrow
Speaker 2: is ask doctor Jesse Friday. And you need to get
Speaker 2: your questions emailed in right now to Jesse at Jesse
Speaker 2: kellyshow dot com. All three hours tomorrow belong to you. Now,
Speaker 2: you've undoubtedly heard and seen things about CNN and The
Speaker 2: New York Times. I don't want to let them off
Speaker 2: the hook, but CNN and the New York Times lying
Speaker 2: about the Iran strikes line, this was the lie they told.
Speaker 1: So this is an.
Speaker 3: Early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency, which is the
Speaker 3: Pentagon's intelligence arm And we do want to emphasize that
Speaker 3: the intelligence, of course, is ongoing. The collection is ongoing,
Speaker 3: and the assessments as a result of that intelligence could change.
Speaker 3: But as of right now, the DIA has produced this
Speaker 3: intelligence assessment that we are told was based on the
Speaker 3: battle damage assessment that US Central Command has done following
Speaker 3: those massive bombings and strikes that the US carried out
Speaker 3: inside Iran last weekend and what we are told is
Speaker 3: that based on the assessments of the damage that these
Speaker 3: bombs implemented on these nuclear sites that as of right now,
Speaker 3: it does not appear that they ended or obliterated Aron's
Speaker 3: nuclear program. Instead, they only set it back by months,
Speaker 3: according to people.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you something before we go into the
Speaker 2: Trump administration and the great way they've handled this and
Speaker 2: the backtracking of CNN, and we'll get do all that stuff,
Speaker 2: but that's not really the point of all this. That's
Speaker 2: just one story. It's one day. We'll forget about this tomorrow.
Speaker 2: But let me ask you something. How would you handle
Speaker 2: that if you were in office in any way and
Speaker 2: the media or a Democrat or any entity was lying
Speaker 2: about you? Because this is something we have discussed before
Speaker 2: on the show, and we will discuss it until the
Speaker 2: day they finally kicked me off the ear. How to
Speaker 2: deal with communists, their tactics, and their lives. For the
Speaker 2: longest time, the GOP tried to not I actually don't
Speaker 2: even want to call it the GOP, the right because
Speaker 2: it applied to all of us. You meet politicians, it
Speaker 2: applied to all of us. The right tried to deal
Speaker 2: with these kinds of blatant lies in the quote nice way.
Speaker 2: And this is why it's important for all of us,
Speaker 2: and why it matters for you. It matters for me
Speaker 2: because jerks like me, jerks have an easier time dealing
Speaker 2: with communists than nice people do. Let me say that again,
Speaker 2: because maybe you are nice, and I'm not telling you
Speaker 2: to not be nice at all. It's good. So I'm
Speaker 2: glad you're nice. Jerks like me having easier time dealing
Speaker 2: with communists than nice people do. Forever, when the media
Speaker 2: would tell an outright lie about the Right or the GOP,
Speaker 2: they would tell the lie. You know why they told
Speaker 2: the lie. They told the lie to hurt the right,
Speaker 2: to protect and defend the communist revolution, and to hurt
Speaker 2: the enemies of the communist They're not media, they're not journalists.
Speaker 2: They're communist revolutionaries who've taken the position of power they
Speaker 2: have to further the communist revolution. But the Right didn't
Speaker 2: want to speak like that, didn't want to didn't want
Speaker 2: to sound mean, didn't want to seem mean, And so
Speaker 2: you'd get a report like this where I mean, that
Speaker 2: person has no idea, no idea, battle damage assessments or whatever.
Speaker 2: That person blatantly lied, their source blatantly lied. We all
Speaker 2: know why they blatantly lied. They lied because they believe
Speaker 2: their role as communist revolutionaries slash journalists is to stop
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, to stop any advancement on the right. Therefore,
Speaker 2: whatever Donald Trump does, you have to trash it, you
Speaker 2: have to make it look bad because that helps the
Speaker 2: communist revolution. That's how they see themselves. But forever, forever,
Speaker 2: the right didn't want to say that. The right one, well,
Speaker 2: I don't want to see mean. You guys are really
Speaker 2: biased or we got this lameness. How many times have
Speaker 2: you heard this lameness or even said it yourself? Could
Speaker 2: you imagine? And if the left did that, what would
Speaker 2: they being? Could you imagine what they be saying if
Speaker 2: this was a democrat pointing out the hypocrisy? Is there
Speaker 2: anything lamer than that? We thought that was effective. It's
Speaker 2: it's a way to challenge what they're saying because you're
Speaker 2: mad about it. But you're not being too mean. You're
Speaker 2: almost you're almost giving them an opportunity to defend themselves. Hey,
Speaker 2: you're being mean and biased and this is this is
Speaker 2: left leaning and hypocritical, don't you think? And yet they
Speaker 2: never reached a handout when you did that today. It
Speaker 2: never dissuaded them once at all. Accusations of hypocrisy never
Speaker 2: seemed to hurt their feelings, never seem to change their tactics.
Speaker 2: They just kept doing the same same thing, over and
Speaker 2: over and over again, lying to hurt you, lying to
Speaker 2: help them, lying to hurt you, lying to help them.
Speaker 2: No matter what you said as a nice person, they
Speaker 2: just kept going. It was exasperating, wasn't it exhausting? I
Speaker 2: don't understand. I just pointed out your hypocrisy. Why haven't
Speaker 2: you changed? Because he's your enemy. You may not know it,
Speaker 2: but he knows it. He thinks about it. He wakes
Speaker 2: up every single day and goes to work, no matter
Speaker 2: what his job is. Maybe he works at the FBI,
Speaker 2: maybe CNN, maybe he's a general, maybe he works in Hollywood,
Speaker 2: maybe he's a kindergarten teacher. But he goes to work
Speaker 2: every single day with plans to destroy you. You don't
Speaker 2: think in those terms. You want to be nice, and
Speaker 2: so finding out that someone has declared war on you
Speaker 2: is almost too much to take. WHOA, WHOA? So we
Speaker 2: tried to be nice. Now I'm going to dump a
Speaker 2: heaping helping of credit on Donald Trump because Donald Trump
Speaker 2: is a jerk. I get it. Look I'm a jerk.
Speaker 2: I'm not insulting them. It takes a jerk oftentimes to
Speaker 2: deal with communists because nice people are trying to be
Speaker 2: nice with them, and you cannot be nice to communists.
Speaker 2: You just can't. I'm not saying you have to do
Speaker 2: them wrong. I'm not saying you have to commit some
Speaker 2: mortal sin or something. I'm not saying that at all.
Speaker 2: But if you believe you can deal with these people
Speaker 2: with the utmost kindness, they will eat you alive. Nice
Speaker 2: people get eaten alive by communists. Eaten alive jerks are
Speaker 2: the most effective anti communists. They are. The GOP has
Speaker 2: completely changed how it deals. It's with this kind of reporting.
Speaker 2: This man des theer's a lot of credit.
Speaker 4: Is like CNN in particular, they're trying to you know,
Speaker 4: they're trying to say, well, I agree that it was destroyed,
Speaker 4: but maybe not that destroyed.
Speaker 2: You know what they're doing.
Speaker 4: They're really hurting great pilots that put their lives in
Speaker 4: the line. CNN is scum, and so is MSD and C.
Speaker 4: They're all and frankly, the networks aren't much better. The
Speaker 4: CNN because I watch it. I have no choice. I
Speaker 4: gotta watch that garbage. It's all garbage, it's all fake
Speaker 4: is But I think CNN is a gutless group of
Speaker 4: people and the people that run it, nobody even knows.
Speaker 4: There's been sold so many times. But the people that
Speaker 4: are running out to be a shame MSD and C
Speaker 4: again named Brian Roberts. He heads it. He's a disgrace.
Speaker 4: He's a weak, pathetic distrait.
Speaker 2: Maybe you don't like that, and I understand that because
Speaker 2: maybe you're not a jerk. Maybe you're not. I understand
Speaker 2: if that makes you uncomfortable. But we're gonna go over
Speaker 2: the media's response to Team Trump's response in just a moment,
Speaker 2: and then it'll be pretty revealing when I lay it
Speaker 2: out that way, how effective that is, no more how
Speaker 2: well I mean, I'm really not sure, Natasha. That seems
Speaker 2: like it's kind of a biased way. Could you imagine
Speaker 2: if Democrats didn't been that never worked that never you notice,
Speaker 2: that never made them play defense. Donald Trump and his
Speaker 2: entire team, which I'll play it all for you came
Speaker 2: out and said you're a bunch of evil, lying scumbags.
Speaker 2: They're even naming names. You guys are dirtball creep losers
Speaker 2: who lie about everything that hurt them so badly. They've
Speaker 2: been running rebuttals on television all day long defending themselves.
Speaker 2: Let's play some examples on how to deal with these communists.
Speaker 2: It's gonna be a great time. I'm in a great mood.
Speaker 5: The Jesse Kelly Show, he's on seven tenor.
Speaker 2: It is the Jesse Kelly Show on a magnificent Thursday.
Speaker 2: Cannot get the smile off my face watching the communists
Speaker 2: play defense and not playing defense because we were nice,
Speaker 2: because we pointed out their hypocrisy. They're playing defense because
Speaker 2: we finally started dealing with the lying scum bags the
Speaker 2: way you should deal with lying scum bags by calling
Speaker 2: them lying scum bags. CNN, in an effort to hurt
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, came out with the report trying to pour
Speaker 2: cold water over a news story that was good for
Speaker 2: Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: This is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
Speaker 3: which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm and we do want
Speaker 3: to emphasize that the intelligence, of course, is ongoing. The
Speaker 3: collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
Speaker 3: that intelligence could change, but as of right now, the
Speaker 3: DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
Speaker 3: was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
Speaker 3: Command has done following those massive bombings and strikes that
Speaker 3: the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And what
Speaker 3: we are told is that based on the assessments of
Speaker 3: the damage that these bombs implemented on these nuclear sites,
Speaker 3: that right now does not appear that they ended or
Speaker 3: obliterated Around's nuclear program.
Speaker 2: Instead, they only How did Trump's theme respond like this?
Speaker 6: Natasha Bertrand published an article in Politico from the Intelligence agency.
Speaker 6: She said that John Ratcliffe was speaking without any evidence
Speaker 6: when he said Iran was attempting to undermine President Trump's
Speaker 6: presidential campaign. And then we of course found out that
Speaker 6: was absolutely true. In fact, the Biden administration declassed an
Speaker 6: Intel report which said they had high confidence that Iran
Speaker 6: had done exactly what Ratcliffe alleged. They did run an
Speaker 6: influence campaign to hurt President Trump's candidacy. In fact, we
Speaker 6: know the Iranians tried to take President Trump's life. And
Speaker 6: so this is a reporter who has been unfortunately used
Speaker 6: by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to
Speaker 6: push fake and false narratives, she should be ashamed of herself,
Speaker 6: and that's not what reporting is.
Speaker 2: How did Trump's theme respond.
Speaker 7: There's a reason the President calls out fake news for
Speaker 7: what it is. These pilots, these refuelers, these fighters, these
Speaker 7: air defenders. The skill and the courage it took to
Speaker 7: go into enemy territory flying thirty six hours on behalf
Speaker 7: of the American people in the world to take out
Speaker 7: a nuclear program is beyond what anyone in this audience
Speaker 7: can fathom.
Speaker 5: And then the instinct, the instinct of CNN, the instinct
Speaker 5: of the New York Times, is to try to find
Speaker 5: a way to spin it for their own political reasons,
Speaker 5: to try to.
Speaker 8: Hurt President Trump or our country. They don't care what
Speaker 8: the troops think, they don't care what the world thinks.
Speaker 8: They want to spin it to try to make him
Speaker 8: look bad based on a leak. Of course, we've all
Speaker 8: seen plenty of leakers, and what a leakers do?
Speaker 2: They have agendas and what do they do?
Speaker 8: Do they share the whole information or just the part
Speaker 8: that they want to introduce.
Speaker 2: How did Trump's theme respond?
Speaker 1: Do you have certainty that all the highly enricheranium was
Speaker 1: inside the four Dome mountain or some of it, because
Speaker 1: there were satellite photos that showed more than a dozen
Speaker 1: trucks there two days in advance. Are you certain none
Speaker 1: of that highly enriched uranium was moved?
Speaker 7: Of course, we're watching every single aspect, But Jennifer, you've
Speaker 7: been about the worst, the.
Speaker 8: One who misrepresents the most intentionally.
Speaker 2: We didn't get whining about hypocrisy, we didn't get complaints
Speaker 2: about bias. We got direct in your face, you by name,
Speaker 2: you your network. You're an evil liar. How effective was it?
Speaker 2: This was CNN today.
Speaker 9: Despite the emotional speech and outrage from the Defense secretary,
Speaker 9: what he said about the DIA assessment is what CNN
Speaker 9: reported for on his issue that he took about it
Speaker 9: being preliminary, about it being low confidence, CNN reported on
Speaker 9: all of on all of this, I was looking back
Speaker 9: just to make sure that we had it all throughout
Speaker 9: the throughout the reporting process.
Speaker 2: Playing defense lying through their teeth again because they are
Speaker 2: on the defensive, no longer on offense. Playing defense got
Speaker 2: called out for dirty lies, called out for being liars,
Speaker 2: called out for being evil. And now instead of being
Speaker 2: the aggressors, while the GOP's you're bias, you're liberal that hypocritical.
Speaker 2: Instead of the GOP being on the run while the
Speaker 2: savages in the communist media chased them down like wild animals,
Speaker 2: now the media is on the defense.
Speaker 10: There's so much more reporting to do on this topic.
Speaker 10: This is a very complex matter, even though Trump tried
Speaker 10: to make it sound simple on Saturday Night. It's really
Speaker 10: important to note what CNN did not report. CNN did
Speaker 10: not report that this mission was a failure.
Speaker 2: Far from it.
Speaker 10: It may it turned out to be a tremendous success.
Speaker 10: We just don't know all the facts yet, and neither
Speaker 10: does the US government.
Speaker 2: On the defense. There is a lesson here for you
Speaker 2: and me. This is not about this one story, like
Speaker 2: I said, which we're all gonna forget about by tomorrow.
Speaker 2: It's not about this one bombing, this one controversy, this
Speaker 2: one press conference. It's really not about CNN or Politico
Speaker 2: or the New York Times or any of these people.
Speaker 2: This is about you in me being shown how to
Speaker 2: deal with communists. And you cannot treat them with kid gloves.
Speaker 2: You can't baby them, you can't try to morally challenge
Speaker 2: them because they don't share your morality at all. They
Speaker 2: are out to get you they are out to destroy
Speaker 2: the things you love the most. They will lie, they
Speaker 2: will manipulate, They will do everything in their power to
Speaker 2: put you on the wrong foot, to put you on
Speaker 2: the defensive, to put you on the run so they
Speaker 2: can then chase you down and savage you forever. But
Speaker 2: just like almost all evil things, all bullies, all evil people,
Speaker 2: they shrivel up like a California raisin the second you
Speaker 2: dig in and say, no, dirt ball, let's fight. That
Speaker 2: is how you deal with communists. I'll finish up my
Speaker 2: talk on this. Hang on, dude, it is the Jesse
Speaker 2: Kelly Show on a wonderful, wonderful Thursday, reminding you that
Speaker 2: tomorrow is an ask doctor Jesse Friday. All three hours
Speaker 2: belong to you. Ask me anything. Does it even have
Speaker 2: to be political? Whatever you email in to Jesse at
Speaker 2: Jesse kellyshow dot com. The questions are already coming in
Speaker 2: hot and heavy, and in fact, I'm gonna get to
Speaker 2: some emails that just to clear out some room, if
Speaker 2: you will, before tomorrow. I'm gonna get to that in
Speaker 2: a few I just want to play you. I just
Speaker 2: want to do this chronologically one more time to kind
Speaker 2: of sum up my point here when Donald Trump got
Speaker 2: a political win. Remember that's what this was about. For
Speaker 2: the American communists. They were looking at Donald Trump dropping
Speaker 2: bombs on Iran. They looked at the poll numbers, saw
Speaker 2: the public liked it. They saw a political win for
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. Because they're communist revolutionaries, they tried the best
Speaker 2: they could to pour cold water all over that win.
Speaker 2: That's why the initial report, and I'm going to let
Speaker 2: it play, was this.
Speaker 3: So this is an early assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency,
Speaker 3: which is the Pentagon's intelligence arm And we do want
Speaker 3: to emphasize that the intelligence, of course, is ongoing, The
Speaker 3: collection is ongoing, and the assessments as a result of
Speaker 3: that intelligence could change. But as of right now, the
Speaker 3: DIA has produced this intelligence assessment that we are told
Speaker 3: was based on the battle damage assessment that US Central
Speaker 3: Command has done following those massive up bombings and strikes
Speaker 3: that the US carried out inside Iran last weekend. And
Speaker 3: what we are told is that based on the assessments
Speaker 3: of the damn edge that these bombs implemented on these
Speaker 3: nuclear sites, that as of right now, it does not
Speaker 3: appear that they ended or obliterated arounds nuclear program. Instead,
Speaker 3: they only set it back by months, according to people
Speaker 3: who were briefed on the assessment.
Speaker 2: So why was their initial report that and then after
Speaker 2: a couple of days they even got a New York
Speaker 2: Times article backing them up a couple of days later.
Speaker 2: They're scrambling doing.
Speaker 9: This despite the emotional speech and outrage from the Defense secretary.
Speaker 9: What he said about the DIA assessment is what CNN
Speaker 9: reported on his issue that he took, about it being preliminary,
Speaker 9: about it being low confidence, CNN reported on all of
Speaker 9: on all of this, I was looking back just to
Speaker 9: make sure that we had it all throughout the throughout
Speaker 9: the reporting process, CNN had reported that it is preliminary
Speaker 9: and of course can be updated, including these two parts.
Speaker 9: It is still early, we reported in our initial report
Speaker 9: for the US to have a comprehensive picture of the
Speaker 9: impact of the strikes. None of the sources described how
Speaker 9: the DA assessment compares the.
Speaker 1: Views of.
Speaker 2: What would put the media on the defense. Wasn't being nice,
Speaker 2: wasn't pointing out hypocrisy. It was being a jersey.
Speaker 4: The fake news like CNN in particular, they're trying to
Speaker 4: you know, they're trying to say, well, I agree that
Speaker 4: it was destroyed, but maybe not that destroyed. You know
Speaker 4: what they're doing. They're really hurting great pilots that put
Speaker 4: their lives in the line. CNN is scum, and so
Speaker 4: is MSDNC. They're all and frankly, the networks aren't much
Speaker 4: better the CNN because I watch it, I have no choice.
Speaker 4: I gotta watch that garbage. It's all garbage, it's all
Speaker 4: fake news. But I think CNN is a gutless group
Speaker 4: of people, and the people that run it nobody.
Speaker 2: What's the lesson in this for you, for me, for
Speaker 2: all of us. I'll tell you what. I actually have
Speaker 2: to go to a neighborhood gathering tonight. I'm not going
Speaker 2: to call it a party because there's a purpose to it,
Speaker 2: but it's a neighborhood gathering tonight. And there aren't many
Speaker 2: in my neighborhood, but there are some communists. They're all
Speaker 2: over social media. Donald Trump's hitler. Boh, that's the ones
Speaker 2: who will walk into the neighborhood gathering tonight and everybody
Speaker 2: will start rolling their eyes and do the whole brother
Speaker 2: thing underneath their breath, and they'll come storming up to
Speaker 2: a whole group of people who weren't even talking about that,
Speaker 2: and they'll start screaming about who knows what whatever the
Speaker 2: latest talking points are they're fed on CNN, MSNBC. The
Speaker 2: liberal aunt Peggy in your life will do this too.
Speaker 2: Maybe they did it to you today at work, Maybe
Speaker 2: they'll do it this weekend at a party, at a
Speaker 2: sports game, at whatever. This will happen in your life.
Speaker 2: Don't roll your eyes and walk away. Don't sit there
Speaker 2: and be silent and then complain about it later after
Speaker 2: you're gone with your spouse, and you don't have to scream,
Speaker 2: and actually you don't have to name call, you don't
Speaker 2: have to go quite as far as Trump does. But
Speaker 2: correct them firmly, immediately, correct the lies firmly and immediately,
Speaker 2: and don't back off. Don't worry when they start getting
Speaker 2: loud about I figures you'd like a Nazi, because they
Speaker 2: will do that. They'll raise the volume of their voice
Speaker 2: to get everybody looking in an effort to make you uncomfortable.
Speaker 2: They don't care about that they're too high on antidepressants.
Speaker 2: They're trying to make you uncomfortable, trying to shout you down,
Speaker 2: trying these things. And you know why they do that,
Speaker 2: You know why that's a tried and true tactic for them,
Speaker 2: because it's worked on the right forever. They know you
Speaker 2: want to be nice, They know you just want the
Speaker 2: party to go well. They know you want to be polite,
Speaker 2: and so they'll try to make you uncomfortable. Don't worry
Speaker 2: about the people. Look at they look bad, You don't
Speaker 2: look bad. Don't raise your voice. You don't have to
Speaker 2: call names, but don't let them off the hook either.
Speaker 2: Be firm, call it out. Watch that communist shrivel up
Speaker 2: and drift away. We have for far too long allowed
Speaker 2: these people to use our niceness. What your niceness, I'm not,
Speaker 2: but to use our niceness against us, our desire to
Speaker 2: live in peace, our desire to be seen as nice. Well,
Speaker 2: I don't want to be mean no more. If you
Speaker 2: try to deal with them in that way, you will fail.
Speaker 2: Think about it like a like a rabbit dog. Think
Speaker 2: about it like a rabbit dog who keeps coming into
Speaker 2: your yard, attacking your dog. They're eating your chickens if
Speaker 2: you have them, maybe trying to bite your kids, trying
Speaker 2: to bite you. A rabid dog out of control, What
Speaker 2: are you gonna do? What's an effective way to stop it?
Speaker 2: Going inside and lock the doors. Just go inside and hide.
Speaker 2: Let the dog run rough shot over your yard, over
Speaker 2: your dog, over your chickens. No, if you really want
Speaker 2: to stop that rabid dog, you're gonna have to find
Speaker 2: an effective way, an aggressive way of dealing with it.
Speaker 2: You have to meet that aggression with your own aggression.
Speaker 2: You can sit inside and whine about the hypocrisy of it,
Speaker 2: or you can go outside in a forceful manner and
Speaker 2: deal with it. Deal with communists, don't let them get
Speaker 2: away with it. I actually have a little bit more
Speaker 2: on that in the moment, but I want to do
Speaker 2: some emails first. Hey, Jesse, can you please explain how
Speaker 2: a whistleblower or leaker works? If they come forward with information,
Speaker 2: how do we really know it's true? For that matter,
Speaker 2: since the press doesn't have to tell who the source is,
Speaker 2: how do we know they even got information? Couldn't the
Speaker 2: fake news people just make up the narrative they want
Speaker 2: and say it was a leaker. Okay, so we're dealing
Speaker 2: with different things here, so let me break down separate
Speaker 2: ways whistle blower. A whistle blower has rules, has a
Speaker 2: process they have to follow. You can't just let's say
Speaker 2: you work at the Pentagon, and you want to trash
Speaker 2: Trump and make Trump look bad. There's a lot of
Speaker 2: those people still at the Pentagon. And you want to
Speaker 2: go to CNN, you want to go to anywhere and
Speaker 2: leak classified information, Well you're not allowed to do that
Speaker 2: unless you follow a very specific process that will make
Speaker 2: you a whistle blower, and that if you follow the process,
Speaker 2: if you follow the rules, I'll put it to you
Speaker 2: that way. There are rules. I'm not going to break
Speaker 2: it down. It's too nerdy that there are rules. And
Speaker 2: if you follow the rules, you have to do a
Speaker 2: B and C. If you follow the rules, then you get,
Speaker 2: or you're supposed to get. You're supposed to get whistle
Speaker 2: blower protections. Hey, this guy came forward with damaging information.
Speaker 2: He did a B and C. Therefore he has whistle
Speaker 2: lower protections. And those whistleblower protections are supposed to I
Speaker 2: keep stressing that because I think about the FBI whistleblowers.
Speaker 2: But those whistleblower protections are supposed to protect good people
Speaker 2: from nasty retaliation when they come forward with damaging information
Speaker 2: against a powerful entity. To be a quote whistleblower, you
Speaker 2: don't just get to assign that label to yourself. You
Speaker 2: have to do certain things to achieve that. Now you're
Speaker 2: asking more about the leaker here and how all this works.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about that in just a moment. It is
Speaker 2: The Jesse Kelly Show. Reminding you if you miss any
Speaker 2: part of the show, you can download the whole thing
Speaker 2: on iHeart, Spotify iTunes. If you are a detail nerd,
Speaker 2: a numbers nerd, you'd like breakdowns of demographics of the
Speaker 2: country and how they vote and which which direction they're going.
Speaker 2: I have a treat for you. Halfway through next hour.
Speaker 2: Ryan Gurdusky is going to join us. If you listen
Speaker 2: a lot, you know Ryan. Ryan is one of these
Speaker 2: detail in There are guys and Pew research that they did.
Speaker 2: They do the research. They come out with this huge
Speaker 2: research paper. I think it's every four years, maybe every
Speaker 2: two years, describing demographics in the country and how they
Speaker 2: voted and men, women and oh John Black. But I've
Speaker 2: had that all the more details than you can imagine.
Speaker 2: Ryan loves this crap. I would never read it. It
Speaker 2: was way too long and complicated, but Ryan broke it
Speaker 2: all down. If you want to know demographically how the
Speaker 2: country voted in twenty twenty four in different ways, a
Speaker 2: different demographics. I will tell you this, there are going
Speaker 2: to be things that Ryan tells you that are going
Speaker 2: to surprise you. They surprised me, and I'm difficult to surprise.
Speaker 2: Things might be looking up for us. You're gonna want
Speaker 2: to hear this about halfway through next hour. Okay's back
Speaker 2: to the email. The lady was asking whistleblowers versus leakers
Speaker 2: versus so I already talked about whistleblowers and how they
Speaker 2: have protections leakers. This is how it works in Washington, DC.
Speaker 2: And let's talk specifically about people who leak to the CNN,
Speaker 2: to CNN or New York Times or something like that.
Speaker 2: Have you seen have you heard? You probably have if
Speaker 2: you listen to the show. The searches for leakers like
Speaker 2: they're already searching for the guy who leaked this story.
Speaker 2: But this is not the first time it has happened.
Speaker 2: They have looked for and found leakers in the Pentagon,
Speaker 2: in various places. Why is the Trump administration doing that?
Speaker 2: Because here is how it works. We have a government,
Speaker 2: as you already know, that is filled with communists. It's
Speaker 2: not that it used to be. It is north of
Speaker 2: ninety percent of federal employees vote Democrat more than ninety percent.
Speaker 2: You may think, well, we're in charge of everything. We
Speaker 2: have the House and the Senate, and we have the presidency.
Speaker 2: They'll put it this way. Republicans are the cherry on
Speaker 2: top of the cupcake that has a lot of icing.
Speaker 2: All the icing is Democrat. All the cake of the
Speaker 2: cupcake is a Democrat. The cherry may be Republican, but
Speaker 2: the vast quantity of the cupcake is Democrat. That's what
Speaker 2: we have right now. It'll take years and years and
Speaker 2: years to fix this problem. But we have a government
Speaker 2: full of communists. And as you know, as we've discussed
Speaker 2: many times before, no matter what his role is, no
Speaker 2: matter the importance of his role, no matter what uniform
Speaker 2: he puts on, the communist is a communist first. Whatever
Speaker 2: else he does is secondary. He believes whatever he does
Speaker 2: is simply a tool to be used for the revolution.
Speaker 2: That's how over ninety percent of our federal employees view themselves.
Speaker 2: And what happens is the media. As you know, the media,
Speaker 2: they're a bunch of dirty c I mean it's as well.
Speaker 2: They get sources, and the sources are sometimes dishonest themselves.
Speaker 2: So let's make it about the Pentagon. Source, probably some captain,
Speaker 2: maybe even a colonel, possibly even a general who hates
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, thinks Donald Trump's evil with just a communist
Speaker 2: wearing a uniform. He knows somebody at CNN, and in
Speaker 2: an effort to make Donald Trump look bad, he will
Speaker 2: get with a reporter at CNN who' views things the
Speaker 2: exact same way he does. So they go out for
Speaker 2: drinks at some place in the Washington, DC area, a
Speaker 2: couple of beers, and tells her, Hey, you know, rumor
Speaker 2: has it I saw a report today that said those
Speaker 2: nuclear facilities weren't actually destroyed. You didn't hear it for me,
Speaker 2: but I saw a report today. Now that's not a whistleblower,
Speaker 2: that's a leaker, and that's that's probably illegal depending on
Speaker 2: the story. Now, that definitely would be illegal because that's
Speaker 2: classified information. That's illegal. The media, you know, they're all
Speaker 2: in this together. The source wants to hurt Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: The media wants to hurt Donald Trump. They then can
Speaker 2: grab that information and they can accurately and honestly say
Speaker 2: when they go on television. Sources inside the Pentagon have
Speaker 2: told me they're not lying when they say that. Now
Speaker 2: What they don't explain to you is that source inside
Speaker 2: of the Pentagon is a Trump hating animal, and that
Speaker 2: source inside of the Pentagon illegally leaked you information, and
Speaker 2: that source inside of the Pentagon is doing everything in
Speaker 2: his or her power to hurt Donald Trump. Every day.
Speaker 2: They don't inform you of any of that stuff. They
Speaker 2: don't inform you that the source only gave you partial information. No,
Speaker 2: the media wants to be able to honestly run to
Speaker 2: the TV camera, run to the podcast microphone, and say,
Speaker 2: sources inside the FBI have told me Donald Trump murders puppies.
Speaker 2: They're not lying. That's what makes it so insidious. They
Speaker 2: found a source who would tell them that, who would
Speaker 2: confirm the report they already wanted to run with. It
Speaker 2: was already ready to be printed inside the New York Times.
Speaker 2: All you needed to bring it to print was to
Speaker 2: tell your editor, Hey, don't worry, mister editor, I've got
Speaker 2: a source inside of the FBI, and he confirmed that
Speaker 2: Donald Trump murders puppies. From there, remember, the system works together.
Speaker 2: The media works with Democrats. They worked with Hollywood, they
Speaker 2: worked with the FBI. They all work together. From there,
Speaker 2: they universally with one voice will elevate something that is
Speaker 2: an outright lie, and they'll all repeat the outright lie.
Speaker 2: And there's two things that used to happen. What used
Speaker 2: to happen was, as we already explained, the GOP would
Speaker 2: shrivel up in that moment moment, call it biased and
Speaker 2: just kind of allow them to run away with the narrative.
Speaker 2: And something else that used to happen was the Normi American,
Speaker 2: not you. You always knew these people were liars. But the
Speaker 2: Norman American would heep, well, I mean, I know CNN's biased,
Speaker 2: but the New York Times is saying it too, and
Speaker 2: I saw this guy say it too, and Politico said
Speaker 2: it too. Normi American will see the same story repeated
Speaker 2: by three four different entities and naturally just assume it's
Speaker 2: human nature. Well, if everyone's saying the same thing, even
Speaker 2: if they're biased, at least it has to be partially true.
Speaker 2: That's how it used to be. Now a GOP doesn't
Speaker 2: take it anymore. Now they call evil liars evil liars,
Speaker 2: and that is getting more and more widespread on the right.
Speaker 2: And as that is getting more and more widespread on
Speaker 2: the right, Normy American is hearing it, he's reading it
Speaker 2: on social media. Donald Trump is tweeting about it. And
Speaker 2: now when CNN says something, Norman American says, AH, probably lying.
Speaker 2: I want to I want to actually point this out.
Speaker 2: There's a couple of specific examples courtesy of Jake Tamper.
Speaker 2: We'll play those for you next