1
00:00:13,039 --> 00:00:16,359
Speaker 1: Hi everybody, and welcome to the Kylie Cast. I'm Kylie Griswold,

2
00:00:16,399 --> 00:00:20,039
Managing editor at The Federalist. Please like and subscribe wherever

3
00:00:20,079 --> 00:00:22,640
you get your podcasts, and if you're just listening to

4
00:00:22,679 --> 00:00:25,239
the show, be sure to check out the full video

5
00:00:25,359 --> 00:00:29,039
version on my personal YouTube channel or the Federalists channel

6
00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,399
on Rumble, and then of course like and subscribe there too.

7
00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:34,119
If you'd like to email the show, you can do

8
00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:37,600
so at radio Atthfederalist dot com. I would love to

9
00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:40,039
hear from you. Well, another week has passed, but the

10
00:00:40,159 --> 00:00:44,479
Democrat violence news cycle continues a pace because week after week,

11
00:00:44,759 --> 00:00:48,880
Democrats just keep giving us more examples of violence, terrorism,

12
00:00:49,119 --> 00:00:52,520
and then this week murderous fantasies. It feels like much

13
00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,320
longer because we've been through so much in the past month.

14
00:00:55,359 --> 00:00:57,640
But it's only been a little over a month since

15
00:00:57,679 --> 00:01:02,240
a transgender identifying gunman attacked a Catholic school full of children,

16
00:01:02,479 --> 00:01:05,719
killing two kids and injuring thirty other people, just a

17
00:01:05,799 --> 00:01:09,159
tragic and targeted act of violence. Then just two weeks

18
00:01:09,159 --> 00:01:13,799
after that, a radical leftist assassinated Christian conservative influencer Charlie

19
00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:16,480
Kirk in front of a campus full of students and

20
00:01:16,519 --> 00:01:19,519
the rest of the watching world, which then kicked off

21
00:01:19,560 --> 00:01:24,760
weeks worth of many so called normy Democrats celebrating Charlie's death,

22
00:01:25,079 --> 00:01:28,719
desecrating monuments in his memory, and then members of the

23
00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:33,400
media and of Congress trying to justify that assassination. Then

24
00:01:33,640 --> 00:01:37,000
just two weeks after that, another gunman opened fire on

25
00:01:37,079 --> 00:01:41,159
an ICE facility, killing two detainees and injuring another. And

26
00:01:41,239 --> 00:01:44,760
even though Democrats pretended, hmmm, we can't discern a motive here,

27
00:01:45,359 --> 00:01:48,840
the shooter's bullets were inscribed with anti ICE messages and

28
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:52,040
that was the natural and dare I say intended result

29
00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:55,640
of the non stop rhetoric from Democrats and the media.

30
00:01:55,920 --> 00:02:01,040
But I repeat myself, demonizing Ice with extreme labels like Gestapo,

31
00:02:01,359 --> 00:02:04,000
which is of course the Nazi secret police. And remember

32
00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:06,359
that as all of this is happening, left wing think

33
00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:09,639
tanks are turning out a bogus study after bogus study

34
00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:14,400
showing that no, actually, it's Republicans causing more political violence,

35
00:02:15,479 --> 00:02:18,319
even as they leave out some of the worst Democrat

36
00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:22,240
attacks and then classify random acts of clearly non political

37
00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:27,159
violence as right wing, completely dishonest. Well, then on Friday,

38
00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:30,000
a little over two weeks after the Ice shooting, we

39
00:02:30,199 --> 00:02:34,840
learned about the murderous fantasies of Jay Jones, the Democrat

40
00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:39,639
candidate running for Attorney General of Virginia. And these texts

41
00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:44,319
are truly something to behold, especially for the guy running

42
00:02:44,360 --> 00:02:48,199
to be the chief law enforcer, the top cop of

43
00:02:48,280 --> 00:02:52,000
the Commonwealth of Virginia. Here to discuss this crazy story

44
00:02:52,039 --> 00:02:55,080
with me is my colleague Brianna Lyman, a staff writer

45
00:02:55,159 --> 00:02:56,000
at The Federalist.

46
00:02:56,159 --> 00:02:57,280
Speaker 2: Thanks so much for having me.

47
00:02:57,680 --> 00:02:59,319
Speaker 1: It's so great to see you. Thanks so much for

48
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:02,680
joining today. I think before we start, we should set

49
00:03:02,719 --> 00:03:05,080
this stage a little bit for people who maybe haven't

50
00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,919
seen the texts. They were reported by National Review on Friday.

51
00:03:09,479 --> 00:03:12,560
These texts happened. They were sent in twenty twenty two,

52
00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:18,599
right after a long time moderate Democrat politician in Virginia,

53
00:03:18,759 --> 00:03:22,199
Joe Johnson, had died. He died at age ninety, and

54
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:25,400
then in response to his death, you had some Republicans,

55
00:03:25,479 --> 00:03:29,080
including Todd Gilbert, who was at the time the House

56
00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:32,280
Speaker in Virginia. They started saying some nice things, both

57
00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:36,840
publicly and privately, about the deceased Joe Johnson, and so

58
00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:40,439
enter Jay Jones, who had formerly served in the House,

59
00:03:40,439 --> 00:03:43,439
but at this point he was he had resigned, and

60
00:03:43,639 --> 00:03:47,159
he starts firing off some texts revealing his thoughts on

61
00:03:47,319 --> 00:03:51,680
the republicans kind response to Johnson's death. He apparently realizes

62
00:03:51,719 --> 00:03:55,360
that he sent these texts to Republican lawmaker Carrie Coinner

63
00:03:55,759 --> 00:03:57,800
instead of who he actually meant to send them to.

64
00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:01,840
But then instead of shutting the conversation down, he doubles down.

65
00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:07,080
And here is how those texts went. He starts, if

66
00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,840
those guys die before me, I will go to their

67
00:04:09,879 --> 00:04:13,719
funerals to piss on their grapes, send them out a

68
00:04:13,879 --> 00:04:17,600
wash in something, and Carry Corner, goes Jay Jones. J

69
00:04:17,759 --> 00:04:22,360
Jones says, three people, two bullets, Gilbert Hitler and Paul

70
00:04:22,399 --> 00:04:26,560
pop Gilbert gets two bullets to the head. So, in

71
00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:28,040
other words, he's saying, if you had two bullets in

72
00:04:28,079 --> 00:04:30,319
the gun, and you had two dictators and this Republican,

73
00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:32,399
I would put both of the bullets in. The Republican

74
00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:36,480
he says, he receives both bullets every time, and Carry

75
00:04:36,519 --> 00:04:40,720
Coyner pleads with him, Jay, please stop. He goes, Lol, okay,

76
00:04:41,720 --> 00:04:45,319
So then he doubles down even more. Carry Coyner says,

77
00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:47,720
you weren't simply asking questions and you know it, He says,

78
00:04:47,759 --> 00:04:50,000
I genuinely was. I wasn't attacking you. I was trying

79
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:54,160
to understand your logic. She says, you weren't trying to understand.

80
00:04:54,240 --> 00:04:57,399
You were talking about hoping Jennifer Gilbert's children would die.

81
00:04:57,480 --> 00:05:00,480
This is Todd Gilbert's wife and his children. And he says, yes,

82
00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:03,959
I've told you this before. Only when people feel pain

83
00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:09,199
personally do they move on policy. But he's still not done.

84
00:05:10,519 --> 00:05:13,399
He says, I mean, do I think Todd and Jennifer

85
00:05:13,439 --> 00:05:15,920
are evil and that they are breeding little fascists?

86
00:05:16,480 --> 00:05:16,759
Speaker 3: Yes?

87
00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:22,600
Speaker 1: Absolutely insane things from Jay Jones here. So these texts

88
00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:26,959
come out. Of course, Republicans are calling for him to

89
00:05:27,120 --> 00:05:30,560
drop out of the race, and the firestorm starts, and

90
00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:34,439
so Jay Jones issues some statements. Here is his first statement.

91
00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:38,920
I've sent text messages that I regret, like all people,

92
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:41,600
he says, and I believe that violent rhetoric has no

93
00:05:41,639 --> 00:05:43,639
place in our politics. But then he goes, let's be

94
00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:46,079
clear about what is happening in the AG race right now.

95
00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:50,399
Jason miars his opponent is dropping smears through Trump controlled

96
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:53,959
media organizations to assault my character YadA, YadA, YadA. On

97
00:05:54,040 --> 00:05:56,079
he goes and he talks about how Jason Mires will

98
00:05:56,079 --> 00:05:58,120
continue to be accountable to Donald Trump, not the people

99
00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:00,800
of Virginia. This race is about whether Trump can control

100
00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:05,800
Virginia or Virginians control Virginia. Not exactly an apologetic statement.

101
00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:09,040
He pushes the blame and basically calls it oppo research

102
00:06:09,079 --> 00:06:12,040
against him, but also doesn't deny the texts. And then

103
00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:15,279
this was his ultimate statement that he issued. He says,

104
00:06:16,199 --> 00:06:18,399
I take full responsibility for my actions, and I want

105
00:06:18,439 --> 00:06:21,519
to issue my deepest apology to Speaker Gilbert and his family.

106
00:06:21,959 --> 00:06:24,439
He says he's so embarrassed and ashamed and sick to

107
00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:28,319
his stomach, YadA, YadA, YadA, all the performative things. And

108
00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:32,079
then he says, Virginians deserve honest leaders who admit when

109
00:06:32,079 --> 00:06:35,920
they are wrong and own up to their mistakes. Brianna,

110
00:06:35,959 --> 00:06:38,879
I'm pretty sure Virginians don't deserve honest leaders who own

111
00:06:38,920 --> 00:06:40,800
up when they're wrong. I'm pretty sure they deserve leaders

112
00:06:40,800 --> 00:06:43,480
who don't wish that half of the voters were dead.

113
00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:47,160
Your thoughts on this whole saga and specifically the statements

114
00:06:47,199 --> 00:06:47,800
as well.

115
00:06:47,920 --> 00:06:49,879
Speaker 2: Yeah, Kinie, there's so much I want to start back

116
00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:52,360
with the text messages you showed now, one message he

117
00:06:52,439 --> 00:06:55,920
said to Carrie Coiner, like, yes, I've told you this before.

118
00:06:56,079 --> 00:06:58,480
Now new reports have come out. What he was referring

119
00:06:58,519 --> 00:07:01,240
to when he says people only change when they feel

120
00:07:01,279 --> 00:07:05,279
pain is he allegedly, in a separate conversation said that

121
00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:08,519
if we kill more police officers, they won't shoot as

122
00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:11,879
many people as if police officers are indiscriminately shooting against people.

123
00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:13,639
So this is a man who not only has these

124
00:07:13,639 --> 00:07:17,680
fantasies about murdering Republicans, he also views law enforcement as

125
00:07:17,759 --> 00:07:21,759
just this murderous, you know, entire group. As for his apologies,

126
00:07:21,839 --> 00:07:26,079
it is egregious that he says, like all people, I

127
00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:28,439
am a Republican, I'm a conservative. I should rephrase that,

128
00:07:28,639 --> 00:07:31,639
I have never once considered or even fantasized or thought

129
00:07:31,639 --> 00:07:35,480
about anyone on the political spectrum being murdered, because it's abhorrent.

130
00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:38,399
So no, not like all people, because all people don't

131
00:07:38,439 --> 00:07:41,160
actually do that. Only psychopaths do that. So you could

132
00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:43,480
have like all psychopaths, I do that. And then I

133
00:07:43,519 --> 00:07:45,800
think what's most concerning is that it's not just him

134
00:07:45,839 --> 00:07:48,120
who's staying in the race, but it's his party that

135
00:07:48,199 --> 00:07:50,759
is allowing him to stay in this race. If you

136
00:07:50,759 --> 00:07:53,680
go back to twenty nineteen, when Governor Ralph Northam, you know,

137
00:07:53,759 --> 00:07:56,240
he had that decades old yearbook photo surface of him

138
00:07:56,240 --> 00:07:58,879
in a bad Halloween costume, blackface, he was called to

139
00:07:58,959 --> 00:08:01,959
step down by Demo. They were tripping over themselves, demanding

140
00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:04,560
he was unfit to serve. Meanwhile, one of their own

141
00:08:04,639 --> 00:08:08,839
is actually fantasizing about murdering Republicans and their children and

142
00:08:08,839 --> 00:08:12,160
calling them fascists. And they're either completely stilent or they're like, yeah,

143
00:08:12,199 --> 00:08:16,560
who among us hasn't called for Republicans murdered? That speaks

144
00:08:16,639 --> 00:08:18,879
volumes about where the party is at, and I think

145
00:08:18,920 --> 00:08:21,800
it does lead credence to the claims from conservatives who say,

146
00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:24,319
how should we share a country and unify with a

147
00:08:24,399 --> 00:08:27,560
country that, behind closed doors wants to murder us?

148
00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:31,279
Speaker 1: Yes, that's exactly right, and you brought it up. So

149
00:08:31,360 --> 00:08:33,639
let's keep going on the train of Jay Jones's other

150
00:08:33,879 --> 00:08:35,080
disqualifying behavior.

151
00:08:35,240 --> 00:08:39,120
Speaker 3: So you mentioned the police officer.

152
00:08:38,799 --> 00:08:40,919
Speaker 1: Thing, the other conversation that he had with Kerry Coiner,

153
00:08:40,960 --> 00:08:44,480
which is as appalling as his text about Todd Gilbert.

154
00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:46,600
To be honest with you, he's basically saying the same

155
00:08:46,639 --> 00:08:49,399
things about police officers that he was saying about Republicans,

156
00:08:49,399 --> 00:08:51,759
which is just that well, if more of them just

157
00:08:51,799 --> 00:08:54,399
need to die and then we will get the policies

158
00:08:54,399 --> 00:08:59,519
that we prefer as Democrats. Just a crazy, crazy, psychotic

159
00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:01,799
way to think. And yet, like you said, something that

160
00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:04,159
most people don't do, this is not actually normal. The

161
00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:08,840
who among us phraseology is disgusting and a little concerning

162
00:09:08,919 --> 00:09:12,120
that they actually think people feel this way. But those

163
00:09:12,159 --> 00:09:15,960
are not the only examples. You also have his reckless driving.

164
00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:18,480
I would love to hear your explanation of that, and

165
00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:22,639
his calling for a police lieutenant to be fired. Brianna,

166
00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:25,279
can you explain some of these other disqualifying behaviors from

167
00:09:25,919 --> 00:09:26,679
J Jones?

168
00:09:26,840 --> 00:09:30,320
Speaker 2: Yeah, So for J Jones, a police officer who donated

169
00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:32,399
to Kyle Brittenhous this legal fund, I believe it was

170
00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:35,039
a twenty five dollars donation, that was enough for J.

171
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:37,960
Jones five years ago now to say that he should

172
00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:40,600
be removed from his position as a police officer because

173
00:09:40,600 --> 00:09:43,799
that was disqualifying. So again, donating to the legal defense

174
00:09:43,840 --> 00:09:47,240
of someone who acted in self defense was disqualifying. Calling

175
00:09:47,279 --> 00:09:50,120
to murder Republicans is actually not disqualifying because we all

176
00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:52,759
think about it, right, Apparently to Jay Jones. As for

177
00:09:52,799 --> 00:09:54,840
his reckless driving, I believe he was going like forty

178
00:09:54,879 --> 00:09:57,799
miles over the speed limit. And what's more ridiculous is

179
00:09:57,840 --> 00:10:00,879
that not only was he going completely over the speed limit, which,

180
00:10:00,919 --> 00:10:03,440
as someone who's supposed to kind of be the standard

181
00:10:03,480 --> 00:10:05,759
that everyone else should follow, not a good standard to set.

182
00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:08,399
He was supposed to do special community service, he did

183
00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:11,559
it for his own pack, according to Restoration News, which

184
00:10:11,600 --> 00:10:15,000
is not allowed, so he didn't even complete the time served.

185
00:10:15,159 --> 00:10:18,840
Then Liz MacDonald from Fox Business, she reported that he

186
00:10:18,919 --> 00:10:21,639
has never actually tried a case. So here we have

187
00:10:21,679 --> 00:10:24,679
a candidate who has never tried a case, fantasizes about

188
00:10:24,759 --> 00:10:27,159
murder Republicans, does not know how to follow the law,

189
00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:30,399
doesn't just speed, he speeds to speeds that could kill

190
00:10:30,440 --> 00:10:33,320
someone on the spot. He thought that someone should be

191
00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:35,759
fired for donating to the legal fund for Kyle Brittenhouse,

192
00:10:35,799 --> 00:10:37,879
but that he shouldn't sit down for calling for people

193
00:10:37,879 --> 00:10:41,279
to be murdered. And last, but not least, this is

194
00:10:41,320 --> 00:10:44,360
a man who was being bolstered by the Democratic Party

195
00:10:44,360 --> 00:10:46,919
and is now trying to make this a Donald Trump

196
00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:50,320
is picking on me story. That's where the Democratic Party is.

197
00:10:51,080 --> 00:10:53,679
Speaker 1: Right, right, So the Donald Trump is picking on me story.

198
00:10:54,480 --> 00:10:56,639
That is how the media are covering it. And so

199
00:10:56,799 --> 00:10:59,960
what we've seen is either media making it a story,

200
00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:02,519
worry about Republicans pounce, which Brianna, is something that you

201
00:11:02,559 --> 00:11:04,759
specifically wrote about. I want to hear about your story

202
00:11:04,799 --> 00:11:08,279
on that, and or they're just doing a complete blackout.

203
00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:12,360
They're pretending that it didn't happen, or referring to the

204
00:11:12,399 --> 00:11:16,679
text just by quoting Jones instead of actually like, for instance,

205
00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:19,240
Political ran a piece and they called the text abhorrent,

206
00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:22,039
the abhorrent texts in the headline, but they put abhorrent

207
00:11:22,039 --> 00:11:24,480
in quotes because in his apology j Jones referred to

208
00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:27,320
the text as abhorrent. But it's like the texts are

209
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:31,159
objectively abhorrent, Like you don't need to quote j Jones

210
00:11:31,200 --> 00:11:33,639
to say this that the way that they are phrasing

211
00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:35,759
things and what they're choosing to cover and not cover

212
00:11:36,120 --> 00:11:38,159
is just exactly what we would expect from the media.

213
00:11:38,840 --> 00:11:41,360
But the ap story, Brianna, can you tell us about

214
00:11:41,639 --> 00:11:42,440
what you wrote about that?

215
00:11:43,039 --> 00:11:45,200
Speaker 2: Yeah, so they associated press I'm reading it here. Steve

216
00:11:45,240 --> 00:11:47,879
Peoples and Olivia Diaz. They want people to know that

217
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:50,399
the real story isn't that J Jones is calling from

218
00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:54,320
Republicans to be murdered, It's that Republicans notice the story.

219
00:11:54,600 --> 00:12:01,320
So they write, Republicans are seizing on recent unearthed violent

220
00:12:01,399 --> 00:12:05,639
rhetoric from J Jones to tarnish the Democratic Party nationally

221
00:12:05,759 --> 00:12:08,559
less than a month before election day. So you see there,

222
00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:11,840
their primary concern is how is this egregious story going

223
00:12:11,879 --> 00:12:13,080
to impact election day?

224
00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:13,320
Speaker 4: Now?

225
00:12:13,320 --> 00:12:16,879
Speaker 2: Because the Associated Press are just propagandists for the Democratic Party,

226
00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:20,639
they know that this could actually impact Democrats' chances at Virginia,

227
00:12:20,679 --> 00:12:23,159
which as of last week were pretty damn good. But

228
00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:26,399
any sane voter who hears these text messages, I think

229
00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:28,519
will have a hard time not only voting for J Jones,

230
00:12:28,679 --> 00:12:32,080
but for voting for Abigail Spanberger, who was defending and

231
00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:35,759
standing by J Jones. So what the Associated Press wants

232
00:12:35,759 --> 00:12:38,159
you to know is that it's pretty bad that Donald

233
00:12:38,159 --> 00:12:42,279
Trump is escalating his campaign to cast his political opponents

234
00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:45,679
as violent extremists. You see, Donald Trump is casting them

235
00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:48,399
as violent extremists, as if J Jones himself did not

236
00:12:48,519 --> 00:12:51,879
make himself a violent extremist. So the narrative that the

237
00:12:51,879 --> 00:12:55,399
media constantly takes in these scenarios is deflect, blame it

238
00:12:55,440 --> 00:12:57,519
on Trump, and that is why they have to be

239
00:12:57,559 --> 00:12:59,600
referred to as the propaganda press.

240
00:12:59,759 --> 00:13:03,440
Speaker 1: Right, and the AP was not the only one. Let's

241
00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:05,720
see here, Well, two days ago I looked.

242
00:13:05,480 --> 00:13:06,440
Speaker 3: On the New York Times.

243
00:13:06,480 --> 00:13:08,720
Speaker 1: I forgot to check this morning, but as of two

244
00:13:08,799 --> 00:13:11,159
days ago, if you search for Jay Jones on the

245
00:13:11,159 --> 00:13:14,240
New York Times, there were zero search results from the

246
00:13:14,279 --> 00:13:16,759
past month. This is a story that broke on Friday.

247
00:13:16,960 --> 00:13:20,240
They had Friday and all weekend and Monday to cover

248
00:13:20,279 --> 00:13:23,360
this story, and there was nothing from the New York Times.

249
00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:28,039
From the Washington Posts, they referred in their headline to

250
00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:33,279
this giant scandal as quote twenty twenty two texts depicting

251
00:13:33,559 --> 00:13:38,240
political violence, Brianna. Something depicting political violence could literally be anything.

252
00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:41,759
We are talking about a candidate running for public office

253
00:13:41,919 --> 00:13:45,879
who is publicly fantasizing about murdering his opponents, But the

254
00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,679
Washington Post refers to it as just depicting political violence.

255
00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:51,559
This is so classic. To make it the least salacious,

256
00:13:51,840 --> 00:13:54,679
least clickable headline, give you the least amount of information

257
00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:57,000
they could possibly give so you have to click in

258
00:13:57,039 --> 00:13:59,440
to find out what happened, and or not even find

259
00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:01,120
out what happened, like if you're The New York Times

260
00:14:01,120 --> 00:14:03,840
and not even covering it. And I think another thing

261
00:14:03,879 --> 00:14:06,399
that's really important to remember here is this would be

262
00:14:06,440 --> 00:14:10,080
disqualifying for any lawmaker, Like this would be disqualifying if

263
00:14:10,120 --> 00:14:12,559
Jay Jones were once again running just to be another

264
00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:15,240
member of the Virginia House of Delegate Delegates.

265
00:14:15,399 --> 00:14:17,000
Speaker 3: That's now what happened. What's happening here.

266
00:14:17,200 --> 00:14:21,720
Speaker 1: He is running to be the top law enforcer of

267
00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:24,080
a state. This is a guy, like you said, who

268
00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:27,039
is driving reckless speeds, could have killed people, who's fantasizing

269
00:14:27,080 --> 00:14:30,159
about killing people, and who's all manner of other things

270
00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:32,799
that could be disqualifying, like wishing death on police officers

271
00:14:32,799 --> 00:14:36,639
so he can get his policy views enacted, and he is.

272
00:14:36,720 --> 00:14:38,919
He's running to be the top cop.

273
00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:39,200
Speaker 3: Of a state.

274
00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:41,919
Speaker 1: It just it makes this story so much worse. And

275
00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:44,120
it's something that's being lost in the sauce of the

276
00:14:44,159 --> 00:14:47,279
media blackout and the media of the skating that's happening,

277
00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:48,559
like like the AP did.

278
00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:52,279
Speaker 2: Yeah, And you can only determine or assume that the

279
00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:55,639
reason the media is either having a blackout or misrepresenting

280
00:14:55,679 --> 00:14:58,960
this is because they implicitly endorse violence against Republicans, because

281
00:14:59,080 --> 00:15:02,320
this is part of the assassination prep campaign that Democrats

282
00:15:02,320 --> 00:15:04,879
have launched against Republicans for years now, and the left

283
00:15:04,879 --> 00:15:06,679
wing media has tried to tell us for the past

284
00:15:06,759 --> 00:15:09,039
month that it's actually not really a left wing problem,

285
00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:11,080
it's a right wing problem. I know you alluded to

286
00:15:11,120 --> 00:15:14,759
that introduction. And so what the media is doing right

287
00:15:14,759 --> 00:15:17,519
now is they're trying to one shape that narrative off

288
00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:20,360
of their party, the preferred party, which is the Democrats.

289
00:15:20,600 --> 00:15:23,240
But two, they're also setting the signal that it's not

290
00:15:23,360 --> 00:15:26,240
so bad if you fantasize about killing Republicans. When you

291
00:15:26,399 --> 00:15:29,440
do that, you implicitly send the signal that any other

292
00:15:29,519 --> 00:15:32,000
talk like that is actually okay, it's not that bad.

293
00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:35,720
And if talk like that is okay, eventually actions like

294
00:15:35,759 --> 00:15:39,120
that become okay. That is called assassination premp. You are

295
00:15:39,279 --> 00:15:42,879
justifying actions through language, and the media is complicit in this.

296
00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:45,399
Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely, And it's not just the media, it is

297
00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:48,559
the entire Democrat party. Brianna, you wrote a bit about

298
00:15:48,639 --> 00:15:52,080
the response from Democrats from Spamberger, from other Virginia groups,

299
00:15:52,120 --> 00:15:54,240
can you give us just a sense of what has

300
00:15:54,240 --> 00:15:57,559
the response from Democrats been to this abject scandal.

301
00:15:58,279 --> 00:16:01,879
Speaker 2: Yeah, a group of Virginia commit Democratic committees basically said,

302
00:16:02,120 --> 00:16:04,559
you know, let he who has not sendcast the first

303
00:16:04,559 --> 00:16:08,000
stone and trying to insinuate, as Jones did in his

304
00:16:08,039 --> 00:16:12,279
own statement, who hasn't fantasized about murdering their political opponents?

305
00:16:12,279 --> 00:16:15,360
Which is actually extremely telling because they think that the

306
00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:18,879
average person does fantasize about murdering their political opponents, when

307
00:16:18,879 --> 00:16:21,919
the reality is most people don't because we are not

308
00:16:21,960 --> 00:16:24,080
a country that's run by lawlessness. For a country of

309
00:16:24,159 --> 00:16:25,960
law and order. If you don't like someone, you vote

310
00:16:25,960 --> 00:16:27,960
them out, you don't shoot them or murder them like

311
00:16:28,039 --> 00:16:30,600
Jay Jones apparently wants to do. But the fact that

312
00:16:30,679 --> 00:16:33,960
Democrats think that that's normal shows that they think it's

313
00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:37,360
normal and acceptable to fantasize about that and to believe

314
00:16:37,399 --> 00:16:38,240
those things.

315
00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:45,159
Speaker 1: Yes, Abigail Spanberger I think issued a statement or commented

316
00:16:45,279 --> 00:16:47,320
on the record to someone that she had talked to

317
00:16:47,399 --> 00:16:49,919
j Jones in private, I think, and basically told him like,

318
00:16:49,960 --> 00:16:51,759
we will not tolerate this type of behavior.

319
00:16:51,799 --> 00:16:52,080
Speaker 3: Whatever.

320
00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:54,120
Speaker 1: Well, unless you're calling for him to drop out of

321
00:16:54,159 --> 00:16:56,720
the race, you are implicitly tolerating that behavior. In fact,

322
00:16:56,759 --> 00:17:00,840
you're endorsing that behavior. But I think crats have boxed

323
00:17:00,879 --> 00:17:02,919
themselves into a bit of a corner here, and you,

324
00:17:03,039 --> 00:17:06,559
as a one of our elections correspondence from this past election,

325
00:17:06,880 --> 00:17:10,279
can speak to this the danger of election day turning

326
00:17:10,319 --> 00:17:12,680
into election season, because one thing that we're seeing here

327
00:17:12,759 --> 00:17:16,880
is Virginia voters. Early voting in Virginia started on September nineteenth,

328
00:17:16,880 --> 00:17:19,920
I believe, and so Virginia voters have been voting for

329
00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:22,680
weeks at this point. Many people have cast their ballot

330
00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:26,720
before this scandal even came to light. I was looking

331
00:17:26,839 --> 00:17:30,119
this week, and it looks like when the texts were reported,

332
00:17:31,480 --> 00:17:36,119
about three hundred thousand Virginians had already cast their ballot,

333
00:17:36,640 --> 00:17:39,119
And so I think it's safe to assume that north

334
00:17:39,119 --> 00:17:41,799
of one hundred thousand of them would be Democrats, and

335
00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:44,720
probably many more than that, because I mean, if tradition holds,

336
00:17:45,079 --> 00:17:47,640
more Democrats will vote ahead of time than Republicans. Who knows,

337
00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:50,480
but that's a pretty safe assumption. And then that's not

338
00:17:50,559 --> 00:17:53,359
even counting to people who voted by mail, whose ballots

339
00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:56,200
came in after the third or whatever day. This story broke,

340
00:17:56,359 --> 00:17:59,279
and so you're talking about hundreds of thousands of people

341
00:17:59,680 --> 00:18:05,319
who voted without being informed about J. Jones's murderous fantasy texts.

342
00:18:05,359 --> 00:18:08,200
I mean, this is a huge deal, and Democrats have

343
00:18:08,319 --> 00:18:12,720
totally boxed himself into a corner because this is election season.

344
00:18:12,759 --> 00:18:15,319
I mean, this is what happens. And so now, how

345
00:18:15,359 --> 00:18:18,680
can Abigail Spanberger call on J Jones to drop out?

346
00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:21,200
Because then what happens All of those people who voted

347
00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:23,880
for him are disenfranchised? Like what do you make of

348
00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:24,160
all this?

349
00:18:24,799 --> 00:18:27,519
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's an excellent point because that is something that

350
00:18:27,559 --> 00:18:30,400
we see these past few election cycles with early voting.

351
00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:33,039
I do think that the benefit of this story coming

352
00:18:33,039 --> 00:18:34,680
out now is even though there may be a few

353
00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:36,960
hundred thousand people that cast to vote for J. Jones

354
00:18:36,960 --> 00:18:39,799
and maybe they would not have casts, Republicans are very

355
00:18:39,799 --> 00:18:42,160
difficult to turn out and off your election cycles. They

356
00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:45,319
are low propensity voters. I think this story is big

357
00:18:45,480 --> 00:18:48,440
enough and damaging enough to get Republicans who may have

358
00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:51,400
been considering sitting this election out to turn out, and

359
00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:53,359
now they have about a month to do so with

360
00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:55,759
this knowledge. So on the one hand, this will actually

361
00:18:55,839 --> 00:18:57,960
encourage voters to make sure that they don't elect someone

362
00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:01,119
who wants them dead. But to your point, look, I

363
00:19:01,160 --> 00:19:03,200
think this is one of the reasons why early voting,

364
00:19:03,319 --> 00:19:05,160
if we're going to have it at all, it needs

365
00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:07,400
to be maybe three or four days before an election.

366
00:19:07,559 --> 00:19:09,559
That's a small enough window. I still don't think so.

367
00:19:09,559 --> 00:19:11,480
I still think election should be held on one day

368
00:19:11,559 --> 00:19:13,359
it's election day, and on election week or a month

369
00:19:13,440 --> 00:19:16,559
or year. I think these voters may learn a very

370
00:19:16,680 --> 00:19:18,920
valuable lesson if they voted for Jay Jones and are

371
00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:21,279
now appalled, and that is try to make plans to

372
00:19:21,279 --> 00:19:23,119
get to the polls on election day because you never

373
00:19:23,240 --> 00:19:25,440
know what horrible news will come out about the candidate

374
00:19:25,480 --> 00:19:26,519
you're supporting.

375
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:29,799
Speaker 1: Right right, and you actually, as a voter, it's beneficial

376
00:19:29,799 --> 00:19:31,640
for you to kind of hold onto your leverage that

377
00:19:31,680 --> 00:19:34,640
you have over candidates before election day. You shouldn't vote early,

378
00:19:34,640 --> 00:19:37,400
because then what incentive do they have to appeal to

379
00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:39,000
you as a voter, or to do the right thing

380
00:19:39,119 --> 00:19:42,079
or to you know, it's like you are showing your hands,

381
00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:46,039
You're giving the game away before you're making them less

382
00:19:46,039 --> 00:19:49,799
accountable to you by voting early. And so, yeah, it's

383
00:19:49,839 --> 00:19:53,759
really interesting. I do not expect any Democrats to call

384
00:19:53,799 --> 00:19:56,680
on him to drop out. But it will be wild

385
00:19:56,960 --> 00:19:59,240
if the top cop in Virginia turns out to be

386
00:19:59,359 --> 00:20:03,200
a murder fantasizing man who went, as you know, forty

387
00:20:03,400 --> 00:20:05,960
six miles per hour over the speed limit and is

388
00:20:06,039 --> 00:20:10,960
just by all accounts, a complete lawless psycho. We'll see

389
00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:14,599
if the story changes the tide or not. Brionn Alignment,

390
00:20:14,680 --> 00:20:16,480
staff writer at The Federalist, thank you so much for

391
00:20:16,519 --> 00:20:18,000
joining me today. It was great to see you.

392
00:20:18,359 --> 00:20:19,400
Speaker 2: Thanks so much for having me.

393
00:20:24,880 --> 00:20:25,559
Speaker 3: Okay, so the j.

394
00:20:25,759 --> 00:20:30,079
Speaker 1: Jones story is wild, but that is not even the

395
00:20:30,119 --> 00:20:34,839
only story of Democrat associated violence that we got this week.

396
00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:48,200
Speaker 4: Should property taxes just come to an end?

397
00:20:48,319 --> 00:20:51,359
Speaker 5: The Watchdown on Wall Street podcast with Chris Markowski. Every

398
00:20:51,440 --> 00:20:54,160
day Chris helps unpack the connection between politics and the

399
00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:55,880
economy and how it affects your wallet.

400
00:20:56,200 --> 00:20:59,240
Speaker 4: Truly, owning your own home shouldn't be a piggybank for

401
00:20:59,279 --> 00:21:03,279
government to revenue. Property taxes will forever make you not

402
00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:06,000
an owner, just nothing more than a serf on the

403
00:21:06,039 --> 00:21:08,480
lord's manner. Whether it's happening in DC or down on

404
00:21:08,519 --> 00:21:10,160
Wall Street, it's affecting you financially.

405
00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:10,759
Speaker 3: Be informed.

406
00:21:10,839 --> 00:21:12,960
Speaker 5: Check out the Watchdot on Wall Street podcast with Chris

407
00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:15,920
Markowski on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

408
00:21:23,200 --> 00:21:26,920
Speaker 1: On Friday, we also learned of the sentencing decision for

409
00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:31,640
Nicholas Rosky, the now twenty nine year old who attempted

410
00:21:31,680 --> 00:21:35,079
to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh back in twenty

411
00:21:35,119 --> 00:21:38,519
twenty two. And I'll refresh your memory here's what happened

412
00:21:38,559 --> 00:21:43,960
in that case. So, Nicholas Roski was mad about the

413
00:21:44,119 --> 00:21:47,920
leaked Dobbs draft, which, if you'll recall, in twenty twenty two,

414
00:21:48,279 --> 00:21:50,279
that was the year that the Supreme Court came out with.

415
00:21:50,279 --> 00:21:51,039
Speaker 3: The Dobbs vy.

416
00:21:51,240 --> 00:21:55,720
Speaker 1: Jackson Women's Health decision. That decision is the one that

417
00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:57,799
essentially overturned Roe v.

418
00:21:57,920 --> 00:21:58,240
Speaker 3: Wade.

419
00:21:58,279 --> 00:22:02,680
Speaker 1: But before the actual decision came down, there was a

420
00:22:02,960 --> 00:22:05,279
leak of the draft of the Dobbs decision, and of

421
00:22:05,319 --> 00:22:08,880
course Democrats were I write about it, while Republicans where

422
00:22:08,920 --> 00:22:11,759
I rate about the leak, but Democrats where I rate

423
00:22:11,799 --> 00:22:14,680
about the decision itself, because they learned that the made

424
00:22:14,759 --> 00:22:18,319
up right to abortion so called that was enshrined in

425
00:22:18,359 --> 00:22:22,039
the Constitution via Roe v. Wade was about to be overturned.

426
00:22:22,079 --> 00:22:24,160
And so Nicholas Roski was one of those people who

427
00:22:24,200 --> 00:22:27,119
was mad about the impending Dobbs decision.

428
00:22:27,519 --> 00:22:28,599
Speaker 3: And so what does Roski do.

429
00:22:29,079 --> 00:22:33,039
Speaker 1: He makes a plan to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh,

430
00:22:33,079 --> 00:22:34,039
but not only Kavanaugh.

431
00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:36,599
Speaker 3: He wrote in discord.

432
00:22:36,720 --> 00:22:38,680
Speaker 1: I could at least there is a quote, I could

433
00:22:38,720 --> 00:22:41,400
at least get one which would change the votes for

434
00:22:41,480 --> 00:22:46,000
decades to come. And I am shooting for three end quote. So,

435
00:22:46,079 --> 00:22:50,240
in other words, Rosky had stated intent to kill that one,

436
00:22:50,759 --> 00:22:56,640
but three conservative Supreme Court justices in order to change

437
00:22:56,680 --> 00:22:59,079
the vote for decades to come. So, in other words,

438
00:22:59,119 --> 00:23:01,960
this is explicit political terrorism. This is an effort to

439
00:23:02,079 --> 00:23:05,200
not only stoke fear, but to get an ideological and

440
00:23:05,279 --> 00:23:10,000
politically motivated result by carrying out violent crimes against your

441
00:23:10,079 --> 00:23:14,799
political opponents. So Rosky researches, He researches mass shootings, he

442
00:23:14,839 --> 00:23:19,279
researches the addresses of Supreme Court justices, he plans, he

443
00:23:19,359 --> 00:23:23,920
buys weapons on nine different occasions, and then ultimately buys

444
00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:27,240
a plane ticket and flies from California, where he lives,

445
00:23:27,359 --> 00:23:30,759
all the way across the entire country to Virginia and

446
00:23:30,799 --> 00:23:34,759
takes a taxi to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's house

447
00:23:34,839 --> 00:23:38,119
with the intent of killing him. Rosky only stops his

448
00:23:38,240 --> 00:23:42,079
plan after he arrives at Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's house.

449
00:23:42,519 --> 00:23:47,440
There are US Marshalls stationed outside, so Roski's plan is thwarted,

450
00:23:47,759 --> 00:23:51,279
and instead he takes off again and eventually calls nine

451
00:23:51,359 --> 00:23:54,920
one one turns himself in, so Roski gets arrested. He

452
00:23:55,039 --> 00:23:58,079
originally pleads not guilty, but then after he can't reach

453
00:23:58,119 --> 00:24:01,720
a plea agreement, he eventually pleads guilty and the government

454
00:24:02,279 --> 00:24:05,680
asks for thirty years in prison for Rosky. Now, the

455
00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:08,519
maximum sentence for this would be life in prison, but

456
00:24:08,519 --> 00:24:12,039
the government asks for thirty years, the defense asks for

457
00:24:12,160 --> 00:24:17,519
eight years, and Federal District Judge Deborah Boardman, who oversaw

458
00:24:17,640 --> 00:24:20,519
this case, agreed with the defense and with Rosky and

459
00:24:20,559 --> 00:24:25,680
gave Roski only eight years eight years for planning and

460
00:24:25,720 --> 00:24:30,000
then traveling to go assassinate not just one, but potentially

461
00:24:30,079 --> 00:24:33,960
up to three Supreme Court justices, only eight years in prison.

462
00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:37,839
It is mind boggling how you can go from a

463
00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:41,039
maximum sentence of potentially life in prison and instead be

464
00:24:41,119 --> 00:24:43,200
sentenced to only eight years in prison. So how did

465
00:24:43,200 --> 00:24:47,960
this happen? While first Judge Boardman gutted the terrorism enhancement,

466
00:24:48,279 --> 00:24:51,640
not because Boardman disagreed that this was terrorism, she agreed

467
00:24:51,640 --> 00:24:54,440
that it was domestic terrorism, but because she didn't see

468
00:24:54,480 --> 00:24:58,200
a reason to believe that Rosky would recidivate based on

469
00:24:58,279 --> 00:24:59,440
the opinion of experts.

470
00:24:59,759 --> 00:25:01,240
Speaker 3: Oh okay, but that's not.

471
00:25:01,279 --> 00:25:03,920
Speaker 1: The only reason that Boardman gave Rosky a light sentence.

472
00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:08,599
The other one that played a major factor was Roski's

473
00:25:08,640 --> 00:25:13,480
sudden transgender identity. So when Roski traveled from California to

474
00:25:13,599 --> 00:25:16,799
Virginia to commit this crime, he was Nicholas Roski born

475
00:25:16,839 --> 00:25:19,400
a male, He was a male. His chromosome said he's

476
00:25:19,440 --> 00:25:23,160
a male. He gets arrested, and then somewhere along the

477
00:25:23,200 --> 00:25:27,359
way he decides that actually, my name is Sophie. And

478
00:25:27,400 --> 00:25:32,519
so the Biden appointed federal district judge factors in the transidentity.

479
00:25:32,599 --> 00:25:37,319
She admits it into her sentencing because she's concerned about

480
00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:41,880
Trump's executive order that requires male prisoners to be housed

481
00:25:41,960 --> 00:25:45,240
with male prisoners and female prisoners to be housed with

482
00:25:45,559 --> 00:25:48,759
female prisoners. These are this is actually a very important thing.

483
00:25:48,799 --> 00:25:51,240
It's really important that female prisoners are not housed with

484
00:25:51,279 --> 00:25:54,400
male prisoners and vice versa. Terrible things can happen there.

485
00:25:54,839 --> 00:25:59,039
But Judge Boardman is concerned that a male prisoner is

486
00:25:59,079 --> 00:26:01,839
going to be how with other male prisoners, and so

487
00:26:02,119 --> 00:26:07,640
therefore she gives this attempted plotted terrorist eight years instead

488
00:26:07,640 --> 00:26:11,920
of thirty or life in prison. Absolutely insane. But of

489
00:26:11,960 --> 00:26:15,319
course the media, ever the duti full foot soldiers, parrot

490
00:26:15,440 --> 00:26:19,720
the trans propaganda, and honestly, reading all of the corporate

491
00:26:19,720 --> 00:26:23,799
media coverage, you would not even know that Roski is

492
00:26:23,839 --> 00:26:28,079
a man. CNN, AP, New York Times. They all refer

493
00:26:28,200 --> 00:26:31,680
to Rosky as she, and many of them even omit

494
00:26:32,119 --> 00:26:35,319
the fact that the original name is Nicholas Roski. They

495
00:26:35,359 --> 00:26:39,200
all just refer to Sophie Rosky, who previously had a

496
00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:42,720
male name, but she was sentenced to eight years in prison.

497
00:26:43,279 --> 00:26:48,920
MSNBC did not even bother with the euphemism of trans woman.

498
00:26:49,480 --> 00:26:53,680
They literally in their headline just said woman, as if

499
00:26:53,680 --> 00:26:56,559
this is just an indisputable fact that Sophie Rosky is

500
00:26:56,599 --> 00:26:59,039
indeed a woman, as much a woman as I am

501
00:26:59,200 --> 00:27:03,599
or anyone else who has XX chromosomes. This whole case

502
00:27:03,640 --> 00:27:08,319
communicates two very dangerous things, the first of which is

503
00:27:08,359 --> 00:27:12,480
that identifying as transgender will get you off the hook

504
00:27:12,559 --> 00:27:16,400
in legal matters, just like identity politics have contributed to

505
00:27:16,480 --> 00:27:19,640
some sort of trans contagion in this country, because in

506
00:27:19,680 --> 00:27:23,359
the Marxist framework, where you view everything as oppressed or oppressors,

507
00:27:24,119 --> 00:27:28,119
identifying as trans or identifying as some other rainbow identity

508
00:27:28,480 --> 00:27:31,960
gets you more victim points than just being a person

509
00:27:32,240 --> 00:27:36,759
with heterosexuality who is sis i e. You are a

510
00:27:36,759 --> 00:27:38,680
man who says you are a man, or you are

511
00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:41,000
a woman who says you are a woman, that you

512
00:27:41,240 --> 00:27:44,920
agree with your literal biological sex. Doing that doesn't get

513
00:27:44,920 --> 00:27:47,400
you any victim points. But now we're also seeing that

514
00:27:47,519 --> 00:27:51,519
not only can you get cultural brownie points by claiming

515
00:27:51,559 --> 00:27:56,079
a trans or just LGBT broadly identity, but you can

516
00:27:56,240 --> 00:28:00,519
actually count on getting a lighter sentence if you have

517
00:28:00,720 --> 00:28:06,920
a rainbow identity. This just incentivizes more transmania, more biological

518
00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:11,799
and reality denial, and frankly, more mental illness. But the

519
00:28:11,880 --> 00:28:14,640
second thing that this case communicates is that if you

520
00:28:14,759 --> 00:28:19,839
are a radical leftist with a conservative target, Democrats will

521
00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:24,279
cover for you. This is nothing short of assassination prep.

522
00:28:24,599 --> 00:28:26,519
You know, we saw the same thing with Jimmy Kimmel

523
00:28:26,839 --> 00:28:30,920
and commentators on MSNBC and elsewhere when they blamed Trump

524
00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:35,400
supporters for Charlie Kirk's assassination. The message is clear. If

525
00:28:35,440 --> 00:28:40,359
you kill conservatives, Democrat captured institutions will completely cover for you,

526
00:28:40,799 --> 00:28:44,400
from Democrat politicians to the media, and in this case,

527
00:28:44,519 --> 00:28:47,279
even to judges. They might pay lip service, they might

528
00:28:47,359 --> 00:28:49,799
have to give you a sentence of some sort a

529
00:28:49,799 --> 00:28:51,799
slap on the wrist. But at the end of the day,

530
00:28:52,039 --> 00:28:54,440
you can count on the media to obfuscate, and you

531
00:28:54,480 --> 00:28:57,160
can count on judges to give you light sentences, and

532
00:28:57,200 --> 00:28:59,759
you can count on Democrats to cover for you, and

533
00:28:59,799 --> 00:29:02,720
to use rhetoric that lets you off the hook time

534
00:29:02,839 --> 00:29:07,119
after time after time. This is assassination prep is extremely dangerous,

535
00:29:07,319 --> 00:29:10,480
and it sends the message that political violence will be

536
00:29:10,599 --> 00:29:14,200
tolerated and winked at. Michael Fragoso has a really great

537
00:29:14,240 --> 00:29:16,880
piece at The Federalist this week on the Roski case,

538
00:29:17,279 --> 00:29:21,160
and he writes, quote, Rosky's sentence isn't just about Roski.

539
00:29:21,799 --> 00:29:25,519
Among other things, criminal sentences serve both to deter future

540
00:29:25,519 --> 00:29:30,400
criminals and to communicate society's values. We heard this regularly

541
00:29:30,440 --> 00:29:33,119
from the judges in the District of Columbia as they

542
00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:36,960
threw the book at January six rioters. For example, Judge

543
00:29:37,039 --> 00:29:40,319
Royce Lambert justified his actions while sentencing a man to

544
00:29:40,359 --> 00:29:43,559
a prison term, just shy of Roski's for using a

545
00:29:43,559 --> 00:29:46,839
megaphone to urge others into the capital quote. This cannot

546
00:29:46,839 --> 00:29:49,480
become normal. We as a society, as a community, and

547
00:29:49,519 --> 00:29:52,359
as a country, cannot normalize the events of January sixth

548
00:29:52,440 --> 00:29:55,519
end quote. It seems, though, that we can normalize the

549
00:29:55,559 --> 00:30:00,079
events outside Kavanaugh's house. Roski's sentence doesn't deter and and

550
00:30:00,079 --> 00:30:03,519
it communicates that what matters isn't political terrorism but the

551
00:30:03,599 --> 00:30:07,759
transgender journey of self discovery. It's hard to explain just

552
00:30:07,960 --> 00:30:11,720
how corrosive this is to our body. Politic democrats today

553
00:30:11,960 --> 00:30:15,160
like to throw around the term fascism to describe conservatives

554
00:30:15,200 --> 00:30:19,079
and Donald Trump in particular, but judges doling out soft

555
00:30:19,200 --> 00:30:22,799
justice to terrorists they agree with is far closer to

556
00:30:22,839 --> 00:30:26,640
what led to fascism's rise in Germany than anything Trump

557
00:30:26,720 --> 00:30:31,160
is doing. Fragoso is absolutely right here, and here's the

558
00:30:31,160 --> 00:30:35,160
real kicker. US Attorney General Pam Bondi has appealed this

559
00:30:35,240 --> 00:30:38,279
decision rightfully, So now it goes to the Fourth Circuit.

560
00:30:38,480 --> 00:30:42,720
But the Fourth Circuit is a left wing court, and

561
00:30:42,799 --> 00:30:46,039
if it does not reverse judge Boardman's decision, which who knows,

562
00:30:46,039 --> 00:30:48,920
but it may not. The next step would be appealing

563
00:30:48,920 --> 00:30:51,960
to the Supreme Court, which is so crazy because the

564
00:30:52,000 --> 00:30:56,200
Supreme Court was the target of the attack. Our three

565
00:30:56,240 --> 00:30:59,839
conservative justices supposed to recuse because the defendant in the

566
00:30:59,839 --> 00:31:03,640
case wanted to assassinate them. Are they supposed to determine

567
00:31:03,640 --> 00:31:08,279
the punishment for the man, yes, man, who attempted to

568
00:31:08,359 --> 00:31:12,400
carry out an assassination plot against them. This, of course

569
00:31:12,519 --> 00:31:16,359
creates all sorts of problems, and so Fragoso goes on

570
00:31:16,400 --> 00:31:19,640
to make the case that Congress needs to impeach Boardman

571
00:31:19,880 --> 00:31:23,319
for essentially condoning terrorism. But this especially is important as

572
00:31:23,319 --> 00:31:26,079
it comes to the Supreme Court, he writes, quote, the

573
00:31:26,160 --> 00:31:29,160
House will spare the Court from having to essentially sit

574
00:31:29,240 --> 00:31:31,359
in judgment of its own case. If it moves to

575
00:31:31,400 --> 00:31:34,440
impeach Boardman, it will send a message to other judges

576
00:31:34,480 --> 00:31:38,039
that political violence is not to be excused. Indeed, this

577
00:31:38,079 --> 00:31:42,200
should be a bipartisan message, because reasonable Democrats shouldn't want

578
00:31:42,240 --> 00:31:46,119
Trump judges excusing, say, proud boys, anymore than we want

579
00:31:46,119 --> 00:31:51,799
Biden judges excusing trans identifying terrorists. Impeachment proceedings would helpfully

580
00:31:51,839 --> 00:31:55,559
put democrats to that question. Even if impeachment or removal

581
00:31:55,599 --> 00:31:58,920
doesn't succeed, it probably wouldn't. It would set a good

582
00:31:58,960 --> 00:32:02,599
precedent that judges to excuse political violence have to answer

583
00:32:02,640 --> 00:32:06,039
for it to the people's representatives. And this part is key.

584
00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:10,279
Judge Boardman may not be interested in deterring the next Roski,

585
00:32:10,599 --> 00:32:13,680
but the House has the power to deter the next

586
00:32:13,920 --> 00:32:19,640
Boardman end quote, and it absolutely should. If Congress is

587
00:32:19,680 --> 00:32:23,160
looking for ways to deter left wing political violence, and

588
00:32:23,480 --> 00:32:26,440
especially after the past few weeks, it should be, then

589
00:32:26,480 --> 00:32:34,839
impeaching Boardman is a great place to start. All right,

590
00:32:34,880 --> 00:32:37,799
it's time for a little Kylie's culture cut because A

591
00:32:38,000 --> 00:32:41,160
it's been a hot minute, and B I actually have

592
00:32:41,279 --> 00:32:44,000
been listening to and watching and reading some things lately,

593
00:32:44,079 --> 00:32:46,039
so I'm here to tell you all about what's good,

594
00:32:46,119 --> 00:32:49,039
what's bad, and what's ugly. Let's start with the most wholesome,

595
00:32:49,160 --> 00:32:51,440
which is the fact that I finished for the first

596
00:32:51,440 --> 00:32:53,799
time reading Mere Christianity by C. S.

597
00:32:53,880 --> 00:32:54,200
Speaker 3: Lewis.

598
00:32:54,359 --> 00:32:55,960
Speaker 1: I don't know why it took me so long to

599
00:32:56,000 --> 00:32:59,559
read this book. Reading it on audiobook was fantastic because

600
00:32:59,599 --> 00:33:02,039
it's only about a six hour listen. I listened to

601
00:33:02,079 --> 00:33:04,119
it on a little bit faster speed, and so I

602
00:33:04,160 --> 00:33:06,559
got done with it fairly quickly. It was a great

603
00:33:06,599 --> 00:33:09,880
alternative to listening to podcasts or music when I've been driving,

604
00:33:10,799 --> 00:33:13,319
and it gave me so much to chew on. Truly

605
00:33:13,359 --> 00:33:16,119
an excellent book. I would recommend it to so many people.

606
00:33:16,279 --> 00:33:20,039
Whether you are not a believer or are Christian curious

607
00:33:20,079 --> 00:33:22,680
but not actually a Christian, you should definitely read it.

608
00:33:22,680 --> 00:33:26,839
It tackled many of the objections to Christianity that I've

609
00:33:26,880 --> 00:33:29,079
heard over the years, and it tackled them in such

610
00:33:29,119 --> 00:33:31,960
a logical and reasonable way that I think is very

611
00:33:31,960 --> 00:33:34,440
persuasive and also just really good brain food. So I

612
00:33:34,440 --> 00:33:36,079
would recommend it. If you're not even a Christian, you

613
00:33:36,119 --> 00:33:38,759
should read Mere Christianity. If you are a Christian and

614
00:33:38,799 --> 00:33:40,480
you've never read it, you should definitely read it because

615
00:33:40,480 --> 00:33:42,160
there's lots of good stuff in there, and it helps

616
00:33:42,200 --> 00:33:46,880
give you language and verbiage to refer to basic Christian concepts,

617
00:33:46,920 --> 00:33:48,720
but just new ways to think about them and new

618
00:33:48,759 --> 00:33:50,640
ways to explain them. So i'd recommend it if you've

619
00:33:50,640 --> 00:33:52,880
never read it, and I would also recommend it if

620
00:33:52,920 --> 00:33:55,599
you've read it before. Definitely something that I will listen

621
00:33:55,680 --> 00:33:59,079
to again and again and or next time. I may

622
00:33:59,160 --> 00:34:02,319
just read it in a hard copy, because I think,

623
00:34:02,440 --> 00:34:04,400
you know, you pick up different things whether you're listening

624
00:34:04,440 --> 00:34:06,799
to something or reading it, and so I would recommend

625
00:34:06,799 --> 00:34:08,800
it to truly anyone excellent.

626
00:34:08,440 --> 00:34:10,679
Speaker 3: Book, as C. S. Lewis is.

627
00:34:10,679 --> 00:34:12,440
Speaker 1: I have a C. S. Lewis book on my shelf

628
00:34:12,480 --> 00:34:16,559
right behind me. He's fantastic author, and everyone should read C. S. Lewis,

629
00:34:16,559 --> 00:34:16,920
of course.

630
00:34:17,000 --> 00:34:19,079
Speaker 3: So that's what I've been reading. What have I been watching?

631
00:34:19,440 --> 00:34:21,519
Speaker 1: I mentioned this last week, but I'll expound upon it

632
00:34:21,559 --> 00:34:25,440
a bit. I finished watching The Paper, which is the

633
00:34:25,599 --> 00:34:29,719
Office spin off show. It is on Peacock. You can

634
00:34:29,719 --> 00:34:32,639
watch it there. The lead actor is from Harry Potter,

635
00:34:32,679 --> 00:34:34,400
but in the show he plays a very different role.

636
00:34:35,320 --> 00:34:39,440
I had exceptionally low expectations for The Paper. I thought

637
00:34:39,440 --> 00:34:41,480
that it would try so hard to write the cotails

638
00:34:41,519 --> 00:34:44,559
of the Office and that it would just be super woke.

639
00:34:44,880 --> 00:34:47,840
I just had that sense, and that it would just

640
00:34:47,960 --> 00:34:49,760
completely flop. That it would maybe have a couple of

641
00:34:49,800 --> 00:34:52,480
funny moments. But the trailer didn't look that funny. The

642
00:34:52,519 --> 00:34:54,519
previews I saw didn't look that funny, and I just

643
00:34:54,960 --> 00:34:57,320
I did not think it would be good, but I

644
00:34:57,480 --> 00:35:00,559
was pleasantly surprised. There was an episode that was a

645
00:35:00,599 --> 00:35:03,800
little bit slow. There were a couple of hints at

646
00:35:03,840 --> 00:35:07,239
things that were a little bit woke, such as an

647
00:35:07,239 --> 00:35:11,760
all gender restroom, you know, all gender things like that,

648
00:35:11,800 --> 00:35:16,159
but none of that was dwelled on, and it was

649
00:35:17,199 --> 00:35:19,840
It was just fun. It made me laugh out loud

650
00:35:20,280 --> 00:35:24,599
many times. There were a few office references because spoiler

651
00:35:24,719 --> 00:35:28,840
Oscar is in the paper, and so especially through Oscar,

652
00:35:28,920 --> 00:35:31,400
they make references to the office, and some of those

653
00:35:31,400 --> 00:35:33,760
felt shoe horden, shoehorned, and they felt a little clunky,

654
00:35:33,840 --> 00:35:37,920
a little bit forced, but they were few and far between,

655
00:35:38,079 --> 00:35:40,599
and they were a little bit endearing, and I just

656
00:35:40,719 --> 00:35:43,440
thoroughly enjoyed the show. I am really excited for the

657
00:35:43,440 --> 00:35:46,639
next season to come out. Typically, you know, first seasons

658
00:35:46,679 --> 00:35:48,360
of shows are a little rough anyway, as they try

659
00:35:48,360 --> 00:35:50,320
to establish the characters and get their feet under them,

660
00:35:50,320 --> 00:35:52,800
and so my expectations are actually kind of high for

661
00:35:52,880 --> 00:35:55,599
season two. Really really enjoyed it, So if you haven't

662
00:35:55,639 --> 00:36:00,159
watched the Paper yet, it's definitely something worth watching, even.

663
00:36:00,079 --> 00:36:02,119
Speaker 3: If you don't end up enjoying it as much as

664
00:36:02,119 --> 00:36:02,440
I did.

665
00:36:02,599 --> 00:36:04,599
Speaker 1: I think it's ten episodes long and they're all a

666
00:36:04,599 --> 00:36:08,159
half hour a piece, So go watch the paper. But

667
00:36:08,280 --> 00:36:10,760
what I really must talk about today is what I

668
00:36:10,840 --> 00:36:14,239
have been listening to, and that is the new Taylor

669
00:36:14,519 --> 00:36:15,519
Swift album.

670
00:36:15,679 --> 00:36:16,559
Speaker 3: And I have thoughts.

671
00:36:16,760 --> 00:36:19,719
Speaker 1: If you've listened to my podcast before or read any

672
00:36:19,760 --> 00:36:22,920
of my writing from years ago, you may or may

673
00:36:22,960 --> 00:36:26,119
not know that I am on the record as being

674
00:36:26,199 --> 00:36:29,840
a swiftye. I have loved Taylor Swift since my days

675
00:36:29,840 --> 00:36:33,320
of adolescence. I had her CDs. I had the karaoke

676
00:36:33,519 --> 00:36:35,760
version of her CDs so that I could put just

677
00:36:36,079 --> 00:36:39,079
the backtracks in my karaoke machine and then I could

678
00:36:39,079 --> 00:36:42,360
be the vocals. I truly loved Taylor Swift. My first

679
00:36:42,440 --> 00:36:44,559
dance at my wedding was to a Taylor Swift song.

680
00:36:45,039 --> 00:36:47,159
You can ask Molly Hemingway because she roasted me a

681
00:36:47,159 --> 00:36:49,079
lot for it. We played a lot of Taylor Swift

682
00:36:49,119 --> 00:36:53,360
at our wedding. I truly enjoyed early, earlier eras of

683
00:36:53,400 --> 00:36:57,360
Taylor Swift, and many of Taylor Swift's albums felt like

684
00:36:57,440 --> 00:36:59,840
they hit at the right point in my life where

685
00:37:00,280 --> 00:37:02,320
what I was going through or the things I was

686
00:37:02,360 --> 00:37:04,920
thinking about or dreaming about were similar to the things

687
00:37:04,960 --> 00:37:07,679
that Taylor Swift was singing about. But this has all

688
00:37:07,840 --> 00:37:11,559
started to decline an album or two ago, and with

689
00:37:11,639 --> 00:37:14,079
this most recent album, I must say my feelings on

690
00:37:14,119 --> 00:37:17,320
Taylor Swift have officially crashed and burned. I don't know

691
00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:19,280
if Taylor Swift will be able to win me back,

692
00:37:19,320 --> 00:37:21,519
and I'm just generally pretty salty about the album. I

693
00:37:21,639 --> 00:37:23,440
kind of hate it. I have been listening to it

694
00:37:23,480 --> 00:37:25,280
for the past couple of days to try to see

695
00:37:25,280 --> 00:37:27,480
if my opinion changes, and there are some songs on

696
00:37:27,519 --> 00:37:30,400
it that I find catchy, but the second I tune

697
00:37:30,480 --> 00:37:33,000
into the lyrics, she loses me again because the lyrics

698
00:37:33,000 --> 00:37:35,239
are so bad now they should go without saying, because

699
00:37:35,280 --> 00:37:37,360
I have long been a swiftye but I am not

700
00:37:37,599 --> 00:37:42,920
one of those boomerie cantankeris gen xers who lives to

701
00:37:42,920 --> 00:37:45,280
hate Taylor Swift and who thinks that music peaked in

702
00:37:45,280 --> 00:37:47,800
the eighties and that it can never recover, and that

703
00:37:48,199 --> 00:37:51,320
you know, the best artists are all in the past

704
00:37:51,480 --> 00:37:54,599
and they can never be rivaled because their coming of

705
00:37:54,639 --> 00:37:57,400
age was the only good music that has ever existed.

706
00:37:57,599 --> 00:37:59,920
Of course, I don't believe that. I think because everyone

707
00:38:00,559 --> 00:38:03,480
when they come of age. There's music that is popular

708
00:38:03,599 --> 00:38:05,840
or that is good when they are in their adolescence,

709
00:38:05,880 --> 00:38:08,039
and that becomes defining music for them, and they think

710
00:38:08,079 --> 00:38:10,639
it's better than the music from when the next generation

711
00:38:10,800 --> 00:38:11,480
comes of age.

712
00:38:11,840 --> 00:38:12,800
Speaker 3: That's just how it goes.

713
00:38:13,000 --> 00:38:16,519
Speaker 1: But I just can't get behind this Tailor Swift album

714
00:38:16,599 --> 00:38:18,960
for a number of reasons. The first one is its

715
00:38:19,119 --> 00:38:24,760
lyrical trendiness. Just listening to the lyrics, it feels very trendy,

716
00:38:24,840 --> 00:38:26,719
like a flash in the pan, like most of the

717
00:38:26,800 --> 00:38:29,079
lyrics are just they have no shelf life. They are

718
00:38:29,079 --> 00:38:31,119
not timeless at all. Let me just give you a

719
00:38:31,159 --> 00:38:36,239
few examples that stood out to me. She says, we

720
00:38:36,360 --> 00:38:42,079
looked fire. This isn't savage pledge allegiance to your vibes.

721
00:38:42,639 --> 00:38:47,440
Glad he ghosted me spring Break that was effing lit.

722
00:38:48,039 --> 00:38:49,039
Speaker 3: You get the idea.

723
00:38:49,360 --> 00:38:53,760
Speaker 1: Very trendy, very ephemeral. Here's a stands up from her

724
00:38:53,800 --> 00:38:57,480
new song, Eldest Daughter. Everybody's so punk on the Internet.

725
00:38:57,679 --> 00:39:02,559
Everyone's unbothered till they're not. Every joke's just trolling in memes,

726
00:39:02,599 --> 00:39:06,679
sad as it seems, apathy is hot. Everybody's cutthroat in

727
00:39:06,719 --> 00:39:10,159
the comments. Every single hot take is cold as ice.

728
00:39:11,679 --> 00:39:14,440
This is just it's really sad. It feels like her

729
00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:17,719
songwriting is Benjamin Buttoning, like she used to be better

730
00:39:18,239 --> 00:39:21,480
at writing music before, and that was paired with the

731
00:39:21,480 --> 00:39:24,400
fact that she was a precocious teen, so even her

732
00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:29,039
like elementary lyricism made sense because she was elementary. Well, now, Taylor,

733
00:39:29,079 --> 00:39:31,800
you're thirty five. It's not cute to write like a

734
00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:36,400
teenager anymore. So you have this elementary lyricism paired on

735
00:39:36,519 --> 00:39:39,840
the opposite end of the spectrum with this hyper sexualization.

736
00:39:40,039 --> 00:39:43,360
And that's another vibe that you get from her album.

737
00:39:43,559 --> 00:39:48,320
It starts with her very sexualized album cover. Shoot, I'm

738
00:39:48,320 --> 00:39:52,320
sure you've seen the pictures and or the music videos,

739
00:39:52,360 --> 00:39:56,039
but this sexualization just weaves throughout the entire album. Taylor's

740
00:39:56,079 --> 00:39:58,239
been trending a bit this way for a little while,

741
00:39:58,239 --> 00:40:00,599
which in some ways makes sense because she's actually an

742
00:40:00,639 --> 00:40:04,360
adult now, but it felt really forced. Back in twenty seventeen,

743
00:40:04,400 --> 00:40:06,599
she wrote the song dress and the point of the dress,

744
00:40:06,639 --> 00:40:08,480
the whole point of the song was that she'd only

745
00:40:08,519 --> 00:40:10,559
bought this dress so you could take it off, and

746
00:40:10,840 --> 00:40:12,760
it felt kind of out of place, like she was

747
00:40:12,880 --> 00:40:15,960
trying to sexualize herself. But it just kind of it

748
00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:18,079
was a little bit jarring, and now you get that

749
00:40:18,119 --> 00:40:22,000
same feeling, except it is through the entire new album.

750
00:40:22,159 --> 00:40:23,719
I'm not going to read many of these lines. You

751
00:40:23,760 --> 00:40:26,679
can go find them for yourself. But one of her

752
00:40:26,679 --> 00:40:29,880
song titles is literally would I'll let you fill in

753
00:40:29,880 --> 00:40:34,159
the blank with that. She writes in another song quote

754
00:40:34,199 --> 00:40:38,599
his love was the key that opened my thighs you.

755
00:40:39,280 --> 00:40:42,239
And then in her song Father Figure, which had the

756
00:40:42,239 --> 00:40:46,159
potential to be an interesting song, she includes the lyric

757
00:40:46,360 --> 00:40:49,239
quote I can make deals with the devil because my

758
00:40:49,840 --> 00:40:53,599
bigger I'm sorry what it's like. She's trying to be clever,

759
00:40:53,920 --> 00:40:56,760
but it's just coming off as really forced and really icky.

760
00:40:57,320 --> 00:40:59,400
I think maybe one of the reasons I'm really cranky

761
00:40:59,400 --> 00:41:01,920
about Father Figure is the fact that, as I have

762
00:41:01,960 --> 00:41:05,280
said on a previous podcast, John Bellion, who is one

763
00:41:05,280 --> 00:41:08,360
of my favorite singer songwriter's producers, came out with an

764
00:41:08,400 --> 00:41:12,039
album called Father Figure earlier this year, and not only

765
00:41:12,159 --> 00:41:14,800
unlike Taylor Swift, not only did he not rip off

766
00:41:14,880 --> 00:41:17,599
the George Michael song, but that song and that album

767
00:41:17,719 --> 00:41:21,480
are all about maturity and responsibility and faith and fatherhood.

768
00:41:21,519 --> 00:41:23,079
And you fill in the blank with all of these

769
00:41:23,199 --> 00:41:27,480
wonderful adult pursuits. And then you have Taylor Swift over here,

770
00:41:27,760 --> 00:41:33,000
who's merging this weird gen Z trendiness with a forced

771
00:41:33,360 --> 00:41:38,360
feeling hyper sexuality together in one album, and it just

772
00:41:38,440 --> 00:41:41,280
comes off as so icky and force And it's especially

773
00:41:41,320 --> 00:41:43,639
odd because you have Taylor Swift in the middle, who

774
00:41:43,719 --> 00:41:48,800
has all of these millennial fans. Taylor Swift is a millennial,

775
00:41:48,840 --> 00:41:50,800
and you've had all of these people who were following

776
00:41:50,840 --> 00:41:53,719
her at the same age as Taylor Swift. Well, then

777
00:41:53,760 --> 00:41:56,519
she gets to be thirty five, a lot of the

778
00:41:56,559 --> 00:41:59,400
millennials have jumped ship because again, her lyricism has sort

779
00:41:59,400 --> 00:42:02,280
of Benjamin Button, and some of her albums recently have

780
00:42:02,280 --> 00:42:06,920
been a little bit lackluster, and so she's trying desperately

781
00:42:07,000 --> 00:42:09,559
to appeal to gen Z, or so it seems with

782
00:42:09,599 --> 00:42:12,079
the lyrics that I read before. But at the same time,

783
00:42:12,199 --> 00:42:15,679
she is so hyper sexualized that it's just this weird

784
00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:19,480
marriage of vibes that do not work together anyway. You're

785
00:42:19,480 --> 00:42:21,880
free to disagree. Everybody has a different opinion on Taylor,

786
00:42:21,920 --> 00:42:24,360
but this is mine, and I just have to say,

787
00:42:24,400 --> 00:42:26,840
as a former Taylor Swift fan, as a former Swift, ye,

788
00:42:27,440 --> 00:42:31,360
could we please just get some quality over quantity. There's

789
00:42:31,400 --> 00:42:35,320
a reason why most artists do not release six albums

790
00:42:35,320 --> 00:42:39,760
in six years. So, speaking for burned out Taylor Swift

791
00:42:39,840 --> 00:42:43,960
fans who are just sick of the instant gratification, Taylor,

792
00:42:44,199 --> 00:42:47,360
just give us quality, not quantity. People get so excited

793
00:42:47,360 --> 00:42:49,079
when they hear that there's a new Tailor Swift album

794
00:42:49,119 --> 00:42:51,039
coming out. And I've gotten to the point where I

795
00:42:51,159 --> 00:42:54,199
just kind of grown because I don't want a quick

796
00:42:54,559 --> 00:42:58,079
new Taylor Swift album every year. I want a lull

797
00:42:58,679 --> 00:43:00,960
because I think in this case, absence would make the

798
00:43:00,960 --> 00:43:04,000
heart grow fonder. I want to lull where Taylor can

799
00:43:04,079 --> 00:43:09,000
really work on new themes and new lyrics and new

800
00:43:09,199 --> 00:43:11,599
rhyme schemes and key signatures and all of the rest,

801
00:43:11,840 --> 00:43:14,039
and come to us with something that is totally fresh,

802
00:43:14,280 --> 00:43:17,400
that is totally new, and that has a long shelf

803
00:43:17,440 --> 00:43:22,039
life and isn't this weird marriage of gen z slang

804
00:43:22,360 --> 00:43:25,599
and hyper sexualization. Go back to the drawing board, come

805
00:43:25,639 --> 00:43:27,760
up with something that is good and lasting and better

806
00:43:27,800 --> 00:43:31,280
and original, and get back to us in another five

807
00:43:31,360 --> 00:43:31,960
or so years.

808
00:43:32,000 --> 00:43:33,920
Speaker 3: Okay, that would be my ideal.

809
00:43:34,039 --> 00:43:36,800
Speaker 1: All right, I'm sounding more and more like a curmudgeon

810
00:43:36,920 --> 00:43:39,039
gen Xer by the minute. So that's going to do

811
00:43:39,079 --> 00:43:41,039
it for me today. Thank you all so much for

812
00:43:41,079 --> 00:43:43,800
tuning into this week's episode of the Kylie Cast. Remember

813
00:43:43,840 --> 00:43:46,840
to like and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts, and

814
00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:49,400
I will be right back here next week with more.

815
00:43:49,960 --> 00:43:52,679
Until then, I just remember through thirds, but all fail

816
00:43:52,719 --> 00:43:59,679
you

