WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.399 --> 00:00:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Europe is our weakest market. We're stronger everywhere else, so

2
00:00:06.639 --> 00:00:08.839
<v Speaker 1>our sales are are doing doing well at this point.

3
00:00:10.480 --> 00:00:16.879
<v Speaker 1>We don't anticipate any any meaningful sales shortfall, and the

4
00:00:17.800 --> 00:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the obviously the stock market recognizes that since

5
00:00:22.039 --> 00:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we're now back over a trillion dollars in market caps,

6
00:00:24.719 --> 00:00:28.559
<v Speaker 1>so really the market is aware of the situation. So

7
00:00:28.600 --> 00:00:30.079
<v Speaker 1>it's it's already turned around.

8
00:00:29.920 --> 00:00:32.359
<v Speaker 2>But sales still down compared to this time last year

9
00:00:34.200 --> 00:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>in your in Europe.

10
00:00:36.039 --> 00:00:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and yes, but that's that's true of all manufacturers.

11
00:00:42.640 --> 00:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no except questions.

12
00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that you're not going to be able?

13
00:00:48.479 --> 00:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean you're quite weak?

14
00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but you would acknowledge when you that what you

15
00:00:54.159 --> 00:00:56.039
<v Speaker 2>are facing. Okay, let's just take it as Europe, what

16
00:00:56.039 --> 00:00:58.759
<v Speaker 2>you are facing is a significant problem. This Tesla is

17
00:00:58.759 --> 00:01:03.000
<v Speaker 2>an incredibly aspiration national brand. People identified with it, it

18
00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:05.439
<v Speaker 2>saw it, they saw it as being at the forefront

19
00:01:05.439 --> 00:01:08.319
<v Speaker 2>of the climate crisis. And now people are driving around

20
00:01:08.319 --> 00:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>with stickers in their car saying I bought this before

21
00:01:11.480 --> 00:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>we knew Elon was crazy.

22
00:01:14.079 --> 00:01:16.439
<v Speaker 1>And there are also people who are by buying it

23
00:01:16.480 --> 00:01:22.599
<v Speaker 1>because Elon's crazy, or however they may view it. So, yes,

24
00:01:22.640 --> 00:01:24.599
<v Speaker 1>we've lost some sales perths on the left, but we've

25
00:01:24.640 --> 00:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>gained them on the right. The sales numbers at this

26
00:01:27.480 --> 00:01:31.719
<v Speaker 1>point are strong, and if we've seen no problem with them.

27
00:01:31.760 --> 00:01:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Mad So what I mean?

28
00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>You can just look at the stock price if you

29
00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>want the best insider information. The stock market analysts have

30
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that and stock wouldn't be trading near all time eyes

31
00:01:49.719 --> 00:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>if it was not. If things weren't, They're fine. Don't

32
00:01:53.920 --> 00:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>worry about it.

33
00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I was citing sales figures rather than share price.

34
00:01:57.920 --> 00:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Well tell me then, how committed you are to Tesla?

35
00:02:01.640 --> 00:02:04.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you see yourself and are you committed to still

36
00:02:04.280 --> 00:02:10.639
<v Speaker 2>being the chief executive of Tesla in five years time? Yes,

37
00:02:11.680 --> 00:02:13.039
<v Speaker 2>no doubt about that at all.

38
00:02:15.599 --> 00:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Well no, I might die, Okay, sure to that. Let

39
00:02:22.719 --> 00:02:24.759
<v Speaker 1>me see you I'm dead? So slight?

40
00:02:25.840 --> 00:02:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that the value of your pay doesn't

41
00:02:30.199 --> 00:02:32.439
<v Speaker 2>have any bearing on your decision?

42
00:02:36.800 --> 00:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Well that's not really Sorry discussion in this forum. The

43
00:02:43.319 --> 00:02:48.039
<v Speaker 1>I think, obviously there should be a conversation for if

44
00:02:48.039 --> 00:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there's something incredible is done, that compensation should match that

45
00:02:53.159 --> 00:02:59.879
<v Speaker 1>something incredible was done. But I'm confident that whatever the

46
00:03:00.120 --> 00:03:04.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever some activist posing as a judge in Delaware. Happens

47
00:03:04.240 --> 00:03:06.039
<v Speaker 1>to do will not affect the future compensation.

48
00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the judge you twice struck down the fifty

49
00:03:11.080 --> 00:03:14.759
<v Speaker 2>six billion dollar pay package that was that was awarded

50
00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to you. I think the value on the basis on

51
00:03:16.879 --> 00:03:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the current value of stock options.

52
00:03:19.000 --> 00:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not a judge, not a judge. The activist who

53
00:03:22.840 --> 00:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>is causplaying a judge in a Halloween costume.

54
00:03:26.639 --> 00:03:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's your characterization. I think the on the current

55
00:03:31.319 --> 00:03:34.439
<v Speaker 2>value of stock options. I think the actual justice according

56
00:03:34.479 --> 00:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>to the law, on the current value of stock options.

57
00:03:37.599 --> 00:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the value of that pay package stands at

58
00:03:39.560 --> 00:03:42.120
<v Speaker 2>about one hundred billion dollars. Are you saying you are

59
00:03:42.159 --> 00:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>relaxed about the value of your future pay package. Your

60
00:03:47.080 --> 00:03:50.599
<v Speaker 2>decision to be committed to Tesla for the next five

61
00:03:50.719 --> 00:03:53.120
<v Speaker 2>years as long as you are still with us on

62
00:03:53.120 --> 00:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>this planet is completely independent of pay. No, it's not independent.

63
00:04:01.360 --> 00:04:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So pay is a relevant factor then to your commitment

64
00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:03.919
<v Speaker 2>to Tesla.

65
00:04:06.639 --> 00:04:11.159
<v Speaker 1>A sufficient boarding control such that I cannot be ousted

66
00:04:11.240 --> 00:04:13.919
<v Speaker 1>by activists investors is what matters to me. And I've

67
00:04:13.919 --> 00:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>said this publicly many times, but let's not have this

68
00:04:17.040 --> 00:04:19.879
<v Speaker 1>whole thing be a discussion of my list pay. It's

69
00:04:19.920 --> 00:04:23.199
<v Speaker 1>not a money thing. It's a reasonable control thing over

70
00:04:23.240 --> 00:04:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the future of the company, especially if we building millions,

71
00:04:26.120 --> 00:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially billions of humanoid robots. I can't be sitting there

72
00:04:31.519 --> 00:04:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and one going to get tossed out by for political

73
00:04:34.920 --> 00:04:39.079
<v Speaker 1>reasons by activists. That would be unacceptable. That's all that matters. Now,

74
00:04:39.120 --> 00:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>let's move on.

75
00:04:39.920 --> 00:04:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well just one question, move on, Well, one question

76
00:04:46.079 --> 00:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>before we move on to other companies, which is that

77
00:04:48.639 --> 00:04:51.319
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if some of what you've has happened to

78
00:04:51.399 --> 00:04:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Tesla in the last few months, did you take it personally?

79
00:04:56.199 --> 00:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

80
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:00.759
<v Speaker 2>And did it make you re great? Any of you

81
00:05:00.839 --> 00:05:13.759
<v Speaker 2>all think twice about your political endeavors because it is

82
00:05:13.920 --> 00:05:14.759
<v Speaker 2>I I.

83
00:05:14.720 --> 00:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Did what needed to be done, uh, the violent antibody reaction,

84
00:05:21.079 --> 00:05:23.199
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just I'm not someone who's ever committed violence,

85
00:05:24.040 --> 00:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and yet massive violence was committed against my companies, massive

86
00:05:29.439 --> 00:05:34.199
<v Speaker 1>violence was threatened against me. Who are these people? Why

87
00:05:34.199 --> 00:05:38.879
<v Speaker 1>would they do that? How wrong can they be? They're

88
00:05:38.879 --> 00:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong, on the wrong side of history, and

89
00:05:41.959 --> 00:05:44.759
<v Speaker 1>that's an evil thing to do to go and damage

90
00:05:45.040 --> 00:05:51.959
<v Speaker 1>some pointocent person's car, to threaten to kill me. What

91
00:05:52.079 --> 00:05:57.079
<v Speaker 1>strong are these people? I have not harmed anyone. So

92
00:05:58.680 --> 00:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>something needs to be done about them, and a number

93
00:06:01.199 --> 00:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of them are going to prison and they deserve it.

94
00:06:05.199 --> 00:06:10.319
<v Speaker 2>You're well, you're referring to the attacks on Tesla showrooms,

95
00:06:10.879 --> 00:06:11.319
<v Speaker 2>but I.

96
00:06:11.240 --> 00:06:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Think, well, it's into showrooms and burning down cars is unacceptable.

97
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Those people will go to prison, and the people that

98
00:06:18.920 --> 00:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>funded them and organized them will also go to prison.

99
00:06:22.120 --> 00:06:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Don't worry, wouldn't you, wouldn't you or wouldn't wouldn't you

100
00:06:32.319 --> 00:06:34.759
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge that some of the people who turned against Tesla

101
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>in Europe were were upset at your politics, and very

102
00:06:40.160 --> 00:06:42.120
<v Speaker 2>few of them would have been violent in any way.

103
00:06:42.199 --> 00:06:46.240
<v Speaker 2>They just objected to what they saw you say or

104
00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:47.040
<v Speaker 2>do politically.

105
00:06:48.759 --> 00:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's certainly fine to object to political things, but

106
00:06:51.639 --> 00:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not fine to resort to violence and

107
00:06:54.839 --> 00:07:01.439
<v Speaker 1>hanging someone in effigy and death threats. That's obviously not okay.

108
00:07:01.560 --> 00:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's absurd. That is in no way justifiable

109
00:07:07.120 --> 00:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at all in any way, shape or format. And some

110
00:07:11.279 --> 00:07:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of the legacy media and nonelests have sort of justified,

111
00:07:14.360 --> 00:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>which is unconscionable. Shame on them.

112
00:07:16.920 --> 00:07:20.079
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about your other companies. Then, in other business areas,

113
00:07:20.079 --> 00:07:22.800
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX I saw that you said in a speech at

114
00:07:22.839 --> 00:07:26.959
<v Speaker 2>the West Point Military Academy recently that the future of

115
00:07:27.079 --> 00:07:31.839
<v Speaker 2>warfare is AI and drones, and obviously defense is an

116
00:07:31.959 --> 00:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>increasingly booming sector. With the state of the world at

117
00:07:36.920 --> 00:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the moment, do you see SpaceX moving into weaponized drones?

118
00:07:49.319 --> 00:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You certainly ask interesting questions that are impossible to answer.

119
00:07:55.399 --> 00:08:02.439
<v Speaker 1>So SpaceX is is the space launch leader, So SpaceX

120
00:08:02.439 --> 00:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do drones. SpaceX builds rockets, satellites and its terminals.

121
00:08:11.439 --> 00:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So SpaceX has a a very dominant position in space launch.

122
00:08:17.720 --> 00:08:22.279
<v Speaker 1>So of the mass launch to orbit this year, SpaceX

123
00:08:22.319 --> 00:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>will probably do, China will do the remain half half

124
00:08:29.439 --> 00:08:31.279
<v Speaker 1>of the remaining amounts of five percent, and the rest

125
00:08:31.319 --> 00:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of the world, including the rest of the US, will

126
00:08:32.679 --> 00:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>do about five percent. So SpaceX will do about ten

127
00:08:35.000 --> 00:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>times as much as the rest of the world combined,

128
00:08:36.639 --> 00:08:38.519
<v Speaker 1>or twenty times as much as China, which is in

129
00:08:38.600 --> 00:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>China is doing actually a very impressive job. The reason

130
00:08:41.720 --> 00:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for this is that we're putting it into orbit the

131
00:08:44.519 --> 00:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>largest satellite constellation the Walls have ever seen by far,

132
00:08:48.360 --> 00:08:53.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think at this point about maybe approaching eight

133
00:08:53.440 --> 00:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of all active satellites in orbit are SpaceX and

134
00:08:57.240 --> 00:09:02.039
<v Speaker 1>they're providing high high mad with global connectvity throughout the world.

135
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, this connection is on a SpaceX connection. So

136
00:09:06.440 --> 00:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a very good thing because it

137
00:09:08.919 --> 00:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>means that we can provide low cost by bandwidth internet

138
00:09:12.960 --> 00:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to pass the world if don't have it or it's

139
00:09:14.799 --> 00:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. And I think the single biggest thing you

140
00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>can do to look people out of poverty and help

141
00:09:20.799 --> 00:09:25.159
<v Speaker 1>them is giving them an Internet connection, because once you

142
00:09:25.200 --> 00:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have the Internet connection, you can learn anything for free

143
00:09:27.679 --> 00:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, and you can also sell your goods

144
00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and services to the global market. And we want to

145
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>have knowledge by the Internet and the ability to engage

146
00:09:40.559 --> 00:09:45.919
<v Speaker 1>in commerce that this is going to greatly improve quality

147
00:09:45.919 --> 00:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of life for people throughout the world. And it has.

148
00:09:49.440 --> 00:09:51.159
<v Speaker 1>And I'd just like to think anyone in the audience

149
00:09:51.200 --> 00:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>who may have been helpful and you know, with Starlink

150
00:09:55.600 --> 00:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and getting it to approved in their country. And I

151
00:09:58.000 --> 00:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's doing a lot of good in the countries

152
00:09:59.440 --> 00:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that have a pret of it, which is I think

153
00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:02.919
<v Speaker 1>this point one hundred and thirty countries are very happy

154
00:10:02.919 --> 00:10:07.159
<v Speaker 1>with it. I don't currently into space space actually getting

155
00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>into the weapons business. That's something that's not an aspiration

156
00:10:10.360 --> 00:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we're freaquent. We're frequently asked to do to do weapons programs,

157
00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:15.919
<v Speaker 1>but we have justified a client.

158
00:10:17.559 --> 00:10:22.559
<v Speaker 2>Do you envisage SpaceX or indeed starlink as a separate

159
00:10:22.919 --> 00:10:27.279
<v Speaker 2>entity publicly listing in the near future or at all.

160
00:10:30.159 --> 00:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that starlink may go public at some point

161
00:10:34.000 --> 00:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in the future.

162
00:10:36.159 --> 00:10:38.399
<v Speaker 2>And what would be the what would be the time frame,

163
00:10:40.559 --> 00:10:42.000
<v Speaker 2>what kind of time frame you consider it?

164
00:10:42.240 --> 00:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean no rush, no, I mean no rush to

165
00:10:43.759 --> 00:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>your public. The public is, I guess, a way to

166
00:10:50.279 --> 00:10:53.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially make more money, but at the expense

167
00:10:53.679 --> 00:10:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of public company overhead and inevitably a

168
00:10:58.320 --> 00:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of lawsuits which are very annoying. So really

169
00:11:02.039 --> 00:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>something needs to be done about the share shareholder shareholder

170
00:11:04.440 --> 00:11:08.159
<v Speaker 1>at road of lawsuits in the US because it allows

171
00:11:11.159 --> 00:11:14.879
<v Speaker 1>plaintiff's law firms who don't represent the shareholders to pretend

172
00:11:14.879 --> 00:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that they represent the shareholders by getting a puppet plaintiff

173
00:11:17.720 --> 00:11:21.759
<v Speaker 1>with a few shares to initiate a massive lawsuits the company,

174
00:11:22.120 --> 00:11:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and the irony being that extreme irony that even if

175
00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the class they purport to represent were to vote that

176
00:11:29.919 --> 00:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't want the lawsuit, the lawsuit will still continue.

177
00:11:33.279 --> 00:11:36.279
<v Speaker 1>So how can it be a class action representing a

178
00:11:36.320 --> 00:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>class if the class were against it? And that's the

179
00:11:39.279 --> 00:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>bizarre situation with Ground in the US that needs it's

180
00:11:42.200 --> 00:11:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a diary to perform as anyone's running public company. You've

181
00:11:46.799 --> 00:11:49.799
<v Speaker 1>experienced this. It's an absurd situation that needs to change.

182
00:11:50.200 --> 00:11:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, do you think Donald Trump might change it? You've

183
00:11:52.879 --> 00:11:55.440
<v Speaker 2>certainly got his ear. I imagine that you've put this

184
00:11:56.320 --> 00:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to him. Is this something you're trying to change before

185
00:11:59.279 --> 00:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>any alnk Ipo.

186
00:12:02.840 --> 00:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, we need, we need a law to be passed.

187
00:12:08.200 --> 00:12:12.399
<v Speaker 1>The trouble being that you need sixty Senate Senate voters

188
00:12:12.879 --> 00:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Democrats will vote against it. The the the

189
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>plaintiff's bar is I believe, the second and largest contributor

190
00:12:23.679 --> 00:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Democratic Party. That's that's the issue. At the

191
00:12:28.840 --> 00:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>state level, this can be solved, and I should say

192
00:12:32.240 --> 00:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Texas recently passed a law which at at least the

193
00:12:37.120 --> 00:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>state level made Yes, it's much more reasonable because you

194
00:12:41.320 --> 00:12:43.519
<v Speaker 1>have to get at least one in thirty three shareholders

195
00:12:43.559 --> 00:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to agree that they are part of a class of

196
00:12:46.480 --> 00:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>shareholders three. This is a This will be really helped

197
00:12:52.440 --> 00:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with privilege lawsuits.

198
00:12:54.399 --> 00:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk about AI, which is in so many

199
00:12:59.279 --> 00:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>of your businessnesses and in all our worlds in different ways.

200
00:13:04.279 --> 00:13:08.559
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the big changes the development of generative AI.

201
00:13:08.720 --> 00:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Since you last spoke to this forum three years ago,

202
00:13:12.240 --> 00:13:15.120
<v Speaker 2>you're in this space, of course with Grop which almost

203
00:13:15.120 --> 00:13:18.559
<v Speaker 2>everyone will know. You co founded open ai and then left,

204
00:13:18.639 --> 00:13:22.519
<v Speaker 2>and you've obviously got a legal battle with open ai

205
00:13:22.759 --> 00:13:24.879
<v Speaker 2>and Sam Altman. I wonder if you could say something

206
00:13:24.919 --> 00:13:28.080
<v Speaker 2>about the status of that, because you were together in

207
00:13:28.080 --> 00:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia with the president last week, with Sam Altman

208
00:13:33.519 --> 00:13:35.320
<v Speaker 2>in the same place at the same time.

209
00:13:36.320 --> 00:13:37.399
<v Speaker 1>In the neighborhood.

210
00:13:38.519 --> 00:13:41.799
<v Speaker 2>So does that mean you are pushing ahead with the

211
00:13:41.879 --> 00:13:43.440
<v Speaker 2>lawsuit against open ai.

212
00:13:45.440 --> 00:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes. So I came up with the name open ai

213
00:13:50.360 --> 00:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>as an open source and as a nonprofit, and I

214
00:13:54.639 --> 00:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>founded AI opening I for the first roughly fifty million dollars,

215
00:14:01.399 --> 00:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was intended to be a nonprofit open source company,

216
00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and now is they're trying to change that for their

217
00:14:08.960 --> 00:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>own financial benefit into a for profit company that is

218
00:14:14.279 --> 00:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>closed source. So this would be like let's say you

219
00:14:18.600 --> 00:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you finded a nonprofit to help reserve the Amazon rainforest,

220
00:14:22.720 --> 00:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but instead of doing that, they became a lumber company

221
00:14:25.559 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>chopped down the forest and sold the word. You'd be like,

222
00:14:28.240 --> 00:14:31.879
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, that's not what I funded. That's opening eye.

223
00:14:32.080 --> 00:14:34.360
<v Speaker 2>They've made some changes to their call for instructure, though,

224
00:14:34.639 --> 00:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>haven't they since in recognition of of what you've said?

225
00:14:40.679 --> 00:14:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Now that's just what they told the media.

226
00:14:43.679 --> 00:14:51.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, they have part they have partly walked back their

227
00:14:51.720 --> 00:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>plan to restructure the business. I guess that's made no

228
00:14:55.600 --> 00:14:57.639
<v Speaker 2>difference to how you feel about it. So you determined

229
00:14:57.639 --> 00:15:02.639
<v Speaker 2>to see them in court, of course, Well, that's that's

230
00:15:02.639 --> 00:15:04.600
<v Speaker 2>certainly going to be one to watch. I also wanted

231
00:15:04.600 --> 00:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to ask you about AI and regulation because when you

232
00:15:07.080 --> 00:15:10.200
<v Speaker 2>were here last talking to John Nickolthway, you had some

233
00:15:10.279 --> 00:15:14.879
<v Speaker 2>pretty strong words about the risk that AI poses, and

234
00:15:14.919 --> 00:15:18.559
<v Speaker 2>you said that you really felt what the US was

235
00:15:18.600 --> 00:15:22.639
<v Speaker 2>missing was a federal AI regulator, that you know, something

236
00:15:22.639 --> 00:15:25.039
<v Speaker 2>along lines of the Food and Drug Administration or the

237
00:15:25.080 --> 00:15:28.559
<v Speaker 2>Federal Aviation Administration. Now you're clearly now in a zone

238
00:15:28.679 --> 00:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>where you're more you're more on the cutting regulation side

239
00:15:32.240 --> 00:15:35.519
<v Speaker 2>than wanting new regulators. So has your view changed on

240
00:15:35.559 --> 00:15:37.039
<v Speaker 2>the need for an AI regulator?

241
00:15:38.879 --> 00:15:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, that that I don't think there should be regulator.

242
00:15:40.799 --> 00:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Is you think of regulators like referees on the on

243
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the field. In sports, there should be some number of referees,

244
00:15:48.799 --> 00:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but that you shouldn't have so many referees that you

245
00:15:50.879 --> 00:15:55.759
<v Speaker 1>can kick the ball without hitting one. So in many

246
00:15:56.120 --> 00:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and most fields in the US, that the regulatory burden

247
00:16:01.240 --> 00:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>has grown over time to the point where it's like

248
00:16:04.440 --> 00:16:09.919
<v Speaker 1>having more referees than players on the field. So and

249
00:16:09.960 --> 00:16:12.879
<v Speaker 1>this is a natural consequence of an extended period of prosperity.

250
00:16:12.919 --> 00:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very important to appreciate this. This is happened throughout history.

251
00:16:18.080 --> 00:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>When you have an extended period of prosperity with no

252
00:16:20.360 --> 00:16:26.679
<v Speaker 1>existential war, there's no there's no cleansing function for the

253
00:16:27.440 --> 00:16:32.039
<v Speaker 1>for unnecessary laws and regulations. So what happens is that

254
00:16:32.120 --> 00:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>every year more laws and more regulations are pasted, because

255
00:16:37.759 --> 00:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, legislators are going to legislate, regulators are going

256
00:16:40.480 --> 00:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to regulate, and you will get the steady pile of

257
00:16:44.639 --> 00:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>more and more laws and regulations of a time until

258
00:16:48.559 --> 00:16:52.039
<v Speaker 1>everything is illegal. And let me give you an example

259
00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of a truly absurd situation under the Biden administration, Space

260
00:16:57.159 --> 00:17:04.599
<v Speaker 1>EFFX was sued for not hiring asylum seekers in the US. Now,

261
00:17:04.720 --> 00:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the problem is it's actually illegal for SpaceX under itard

262
00:17:08.759 --> 00:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in National Traffic and Arms regulations to hire anyone who

263
00:17:12.200 --> 00:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is not a permanent resident of the United States, because

264
00:17:15.359 --> 00:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the preface being that they will take advanced rocket technology

265
00:17:18.119 --> 00:17:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and return to their home country if they're not a

266
00:17:19.839 --> 00:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>permanent resident. So we're simultaneously in a situation where it's

267
00:17:24.960 --> 00:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>illegal to hire simul science use and is also illegal

268
00:17:28.920 --> 00:17:33.559
<v Speaker 1>to hire asylum seekers, and the Widen's Departner of Justice

269
00:17:33.640 --> 00:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>chose to prosecute us despite both paths being illegal. Down

270
00:17:38.079 --> 00:17:39.279
<v Speaker 1>if you do, Down if you don't.

271
00:17:39.599 --> 00:17:44.000
<v Speaker 2>My question specifically about a regulator for AI, which you

272
00:17:44.200 --> 00:17:46.839
<v Speaker 2>said three years ago was needed, and you said we

273
00:17:46.920 --> 00:17:50.799
<v Speaker 2>need to be proactive on the regulation of AI rather

274
00:17:50.880 --> 00:17:53.319
<v Speaker 2>than reactive. Have you changed your mind on that?

275
00:17:54.559 --> 00:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>No, of course not. No, of course not. What I'm

276
00:17:57.640 --> 00:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>saying is that there should be summer recently on the field,

277
00:18:01.640 --> 00:18:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a few referees, but you shouldn't have a field jam

278
00:18:05.279 --> 00:18:08.519
<v Speaker 1>packed with referees, uh that such that you cannot kick

279
00:18:08.680 --> 00:18:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the ball in any direction without hitting one. So the

280
00:18:12.440 --> 00:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the fields that have been around for a long time,

281
00:18:14.680 --> 00:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>such as automotive, so aerospace, you know, if the sort

282
00:18:21.720 --> 00:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of food and drug industries are overregulated, but the new

283
00:18:26.519 --> 00:18:31.319
<v Speaker 1>fields like artificial intelligence are underregulated. In fact, there is

284
00:18:31.359 --> 00:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>no regulator.

285
00:18:32.319 --> 00:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>At all, so they should be. Do you still think.

286
00:18:34.720 --> 00:18:38.559
<v Speaker 1>That, Yes, I'm simply saying, which I think is just

287
00:18:38.960 --> 00:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>basic common sense, that you want to have at least

288
00:18:42.480 --> 00:18:44.599
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a few referees in the field.

289
00:18:44.720 --> 00:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to have an army of referees, but

290
00:18:48.279 --> 00:18:50.799
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a few referees on any given field,

291
00:18:51.119 --> 00:18:55.279
<v Speaker 1>in any given sport or any given arena, industrial arena,

292
00:18:56.079 --> 00:19:00.079
<v Speaker 1>to ensure help that public safety is taking care of

293
00:19:00.079 --> 00:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of But you already has. So there's a there's a

294
00:19:03.799 --> 00:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a proper number of referees. Like I said, it's

295
00:19:06.920 --> 00:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>actually very easy to visualize this when compared to sports.

296
00:19:10.160 --> 00:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>If the whole field is packed with referees, that would

297
00:19:13.440 --> 00:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>look absurd. But if there were no referees at all,

298
00:19:17.000 --> 00:19:18.319
<v Speaker 1>your game is not going to be as good.

299
00:19:19.359 --> 00:19:23.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's then talk about your new world, your

300
00:19:24.039 --> 00:19:27.599
<v Speaker 2>your role advising government. You are in this unique and

301
00:19:28.079 --> 00:19:32.680
<v Speaker 2>unprecedented position of having billions of dollars worth of contracts

302
00:19:32.680 --> 00:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>with the federal government yourself, mostly through SpaceX and also

303
00:19:36.440 --> 00:19:39.680
<v Speaker 2>now an insight does knowledge of it because of those

304
00:19:40.279 --> 00:19:44.759
<v Speaker 2>can you see that there is a conflict of interest

305
00:19:44.880 --> 00:19:47.440
<v Speaker 2>or a potential conflict of interest in broad terms, just

306
00:19:47.519 --> 00:19:48.519
<v Speaker 2>through that very fact.

307
00:19:51.240 --> 00:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Actually, there have been many advisors

308
00:19:53.759 --> 00:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in throughout history and the US goverment and others who

309
00:19:58.000 --> 00:20:02.759
<v Speaker 1>have had economic interests, and I am silutely an advisor.

310
00:20:03.200 --> 00:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a formal power. And that's a president

311
00:20:08.039 --> 00:20:12.039
<v Speaker 1>can choose to accept my advice or not, and that's

312
00:20:12.079 --> 00:20:14.559
<v Speaker 1>that's how it goes. If there's a single contract that

313
00:20:15.680 --> 00:20:18.039
<v Speaker 1>any of my companies that have received that people think

314
00:20:18.200 --> 00:20:24.559
<v Speaker 1>is somehow not was awarded improperly, it would immediately be

315
00:20:24.599 --> 00:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>front page news, to say the least. And if if

316
00:20:29.720 --> 00:20:32.079
<v Speaker 1>if I hadn't mentioned it something, my competitors would. So

317
00:20:32.119 --> 00:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're not seeing that, then the cliller is not

318
00:20:34.480 --> 00:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a complex of interest. The Yeah, there's.

319
00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Another way though to look at it. That For example,

320
00:20:41.880 --> 00:20:44.839
<v Speaker 2>you have many competitors, whether it's companies like Boeing or

321
00:20:44.839 --> 00:20:47.359
<v Speaker 2>companies would like to do more of the kind of

322
00:20:47.359 --> 00:20:50.240
<v Speaker 2>work you do for NASA Blue Origin Rocket Lab. And

323
00:20:51.039 --> 00:20:58.079
<v Speaker 2>because DOGE is in every federal government department, you or

324
00:20:58.119 --> 00:21:01.599
<v Speaker 2>people who work for DOGE and you are the driving

325
00:21:01.640 --> 00:21:06.400
<v Speaker 2>force behind it, have an insight into those companies affairs

326
00:21:06.440 --> 00:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and those companies relationships with the federal government.

327
00:21:11.599 --> 00:21:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Now, all we do is we review the organization to

328
00:21:16.599 --> 00:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>see if if the organization has departments that are no

329
00:21:21.799 --> 00:21:26.559
<v Speaker 1>longer relevant, and and then are the contracts that that

330
00:21:26.680 --> 00:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are being awarded good value for money? In fact, frankly,

331
00:21:29.519 --> 00:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the bar is not particularly high. Is there any value

332
00:21:31.759 --> 00:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>money in a contract? And if there's if there isn't,

333
00:21:35.440 --> 00:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>then we may make recommendations to the secretary. The secretary

334
00:21:38.680 --> 00:21:42.079
<v Speaker 1>can I choose to take those actions or not take

335
00:21:42.119 --> 00:21:46.039
<v Speaker 1>those actions, And that's it. And then any action that

336
00:21:46.039 --> 00:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that that is as a function of DOGE is posted

337
00:21:48.799 --> 00:21:52.799
<v Speaker 1>to the DOGE website and to the doge dog got

338
00:21:52.880 --> 00:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>at doge handle on the x platform. So it's it's

339
00:21:56.440 --> 00:22:00.759
<v Speaker 1>complete tran transparency. And I have not seen any a

340
00:22:00.920 --> 00:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>case where where so that's my large it's even been

341
00:22:04.440 --> 00:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>an accusation of conflict because it is completely and utterly transparent.

342
00:22:10.799 --> 00:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

343
00:22:11.319 --> 00:22:15.200
<v Speaker 2>And what about the international dimension. Now, let's think about Starlink.

344
00:22:15.240 --> 00:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Starlink is obviously a very very good internet service. It's

345
00:22:18.759 --> 00:22:21.400
<v Speaker 2>sought after all over the world. It's critical to the

346
00:22:21.400 --> 00:22:26.079
<v Speaker 2>frontline in Ukraine. It has also had more contracts coming

347
00:22:26.200 --> 00:22:29.200
<v Speaker 2>its way, and there is some evidence that companies are

348
00:22:29.200 --> 00:22:33.200
<v Speaker 2>allowing access to it because they want to be close

349
00:22:33.279 --> 00:22:35.839
<v Speaker 2>to the Trump administration and send the right signal. So

350
00:22:36.160 --> 00:22:39.079
<v Speaker 2>bloomberat It broke news today that the South African government

351
00:22:39.160 --> 00:22:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is working around the rules on black ownership in order

352
00:22:42.440 --> 00:22:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to allow starlinkin and that is being done on the

353
00:22:45.519 --> 00:22:49.319
<v Speaker 2>eve of the visit the President Ramaposa is going to

354
00:22:49.359 --> 00:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>make the White House. Do you recognize that as a

355
00:22:52.440 --> 00:22:53.519
<v Speaker 2>conflict of interest?

356
00:22:54.799 --> 00:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Now? Of course, first of all, you should be questioning

357
00:22:57.599 --> 00:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>why is there why are the racist laws in Africa?

358
00:22:59.680 --> 00:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>That's the first problem. That's what you should be attacking.

359
00:23:03.359 --> 00:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It's improper for the racist laws in South Africa. The

360
00:23:06.680 --> 00:23:10.559
<v Speaker 1>whole idea with what Nelson Mandela, who is a great man, proposed,

361
00:23:10.599 --> 00:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was that all races should be on an equal footing.

362
00:23:13.079 --> 00:23:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Is South Africa. That's the right thing to do, not

363
00:23:15.720 --> 00:23:17.839
<v Speaker 1>to replace one set of racist laws, but another set

364
00:23:17.880 --> 00:23:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of racist laws which is ubslutely wrong and improper. So

365
00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:26.039
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the deal, that all races should be treated

366
00:23:26.079 --> 00:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>equally and there should be no preference given to one

367
00:23:29.039 --> 00:23:31.799
<v Speaker 1>or the other. Whereas there are now one hundred and

368
00:23:31.839 --> 00:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>forty laws in South Africa that give that basically gives

369
00:23:38.720 --> 00:23:41.079
<v Speaker 1>strong preference to to if you're if you're black South

370
00:23:41.079 --> 00:23:44.519
<v Speaker 1>African and not otherwise. And so now I'm in the

371
00:23:44.559 --> 00:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>subsurd situation where I was born in South Africa but

372
00:23:46.559 --> 00:23:50.559
<v Speaker 1>cannot get a license to operate installing because I'm not black. Well,

373
00:23:50.559 --> 00:23:54.279
<v Speaker 1>it looks it looks looks like that, right, it looks

374
00:23:54.319 --> 00:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like that's about to change. I just asked you a question,

375
00:23:58.079 --> 00:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Please answer. Does that seem right to you?

376
00:24:00.519 --> 00:24:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, those rules were designed to bring Those rules were

377
00:24:05.000 --> 00:24:08.160
<v Speaker 2>designed to bring about an era of more economic equality

378
00:24:08.319 --> 00:24:11.519
<v Speaker 2>in South Africa, and it looks like the government has

379
00:24:11.519 --> 00:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>found a way around those rules for you.

380
00:24:15.079 --> 00:24:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Ask your question.

381
00:24:17.160 --> 00:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>This is this is your interview. Everyone wants to hear from.

382
00:24:19.519 --> 00:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You, yes or no.

383
00:24:21.720 --> 00:24:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Not for me, Not for me to answer. I have

384
00:24:24.839 --> 00:24:28.319
<v Speaker 2>got a question for you about about your government work

385
00:24:28.480 --> 00:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and the amount of savings raceless loves. This is not

386
00:24:33.880 --> 00:24:36.920
<v Speaker 2>for me to answer. Come on, now, you wouldn't be

387
00:24:36.920 --> 00:24:38.599
<v Speaker 2>trying to dodge a question.

388
00:24:40.960 --> 00:24:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Question answer you answer?

389
00:24:42.960 --> 00:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I say, I think if you I'm sure you can

390
00:24:45.279 --> 00:24:47.799
<v Speaker 2>have that conversation directly with the South African government if

391
00:24:47.799 --> 00:24:49.880
<v Speaker 2>you want to. I want to ask you about the

392
00:24:50.039 --> 00:24:53.880
<v Speaker 2>total I want to ask you about the total around.

393
00:24:55.519 --> 00:24:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about the total amount that

394
00:24:57.440 --> 00:25:01.359
<v Speaker 2>you're planning to save through doses work. Before the election,

395
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you said it was going to be at least two trillion.

396
00:25:04.400 --> 00:25:08.839
<v Speaker 2>The number currently on dose DOGARV is one hundred and

397
00:25:08.839 --> 00:25:12.759
<v Speaker 2>seventy billion dollars. That's a big change. What happened to

398
00:25:12.799 --> 00:25:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the two trillion.

399
00:25:15.119 --> 00:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Or do you expect it to happen immediately? Well?

400
00:25:17.720 --> 00:25:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to happen because dose is supposed to

401
00:25:19.759 --> 00:25:20.920
<v Speaker 2>run till next July.

402
00:25:21.920 --> 00:25:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean your question is episode in this fundamental premise?

403
00:25:25.319 --> 00:25:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Are you assuming that on day you know, within a

404
00:25:28.039 --> 00:25:30.279
<v Speaker 1>few months this instant two trillion saved.

405
00:25:30.759 --> 00:25:32.319
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not sure. I'm just asking you. Is that

406
00:25:32.400 --> 00:25:33.240
<v Speaker 2>still your aim?

407
00:25:33.359 --> 00:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Then? Is it still your aim to get amount of time?

408
00:25:37.279 --> 00:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Have we not made good progress given the amount of time?

409
00:25:40.759 --> 00:25:43.039
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what I'm asking. So is it still your

410
00:25:43.079 --> 00:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>aim to go from one hundred and seventy billion to

411
00:25:45.599 --> 00:25:46.400
<v Speaker 2>two trillion?

412
00:25:49.319 --> 00:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>The ability of those to operate is this function of

413
00:25:53.359 --> 00:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>whether the government and doesn't quit. The Congress is willing

414
00:25:59.200 --> 00:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to take our advice. We're not the dictators of the government.

415
00:26:03.039 --> 00:26:07.279
<v Speaker 1>We are the advisors, and so we can advise, and

416
00:26:07.319 --> 00:26:09.559
<v Speaker 1>the progress we've made thus far I think is incredible.

417
00:26:09.640 --> 00:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Those teams do incredible work, but the magnitude of the

418
00:26:16.039 --> 00:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>savings is proportionate to the support we get from Congress

419
00:26:19.960 --> 00:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and from the executive branch of the government in general.

420
00:26:25.960 --> 00:26:30.799
<v Speaker 1>So we're not the dictators. We are the advisors. But

421
00:26:30.839 --> 00:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>thus far, for advisors with the DOG team, to their credit,

422
00:26:36.839 --> 00:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>has made incredible progress.

423
00:26:40.720 --> 00:26:44.160
<v Speaker 2>You've talked about four billion dollars a day being saved,

424
00:26:45.039 --> 00:26:48.720
<v Speaker 2>but that that won't get which is an I think

425
00:26:48.759 --> 00:26:52.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone can agree that combating waste and inefficiency in government

426
00:26:52.720 --> 00:26:54.880
<v Speaker 2>is a very good thing, but if you add that up,

427
00:26:55.000 --> 00:26:56.519
<v Speaker 2>is not going to get to two trillion over the

428
00:26:56.559 --> 00:27:04.359
<v Speaker 2>lifetime of DOG. I'm sorry, the four billion, the four

429
00:27:04.359 --> 00:27:06.359
<v Speaker 2>billion a day, if those are going to run till

430
00:27:06.400 --> 00:27:08.759
<v Speaker 2>next July, is not going to get you to two

431
00:27:08.759 --> 00:27:14.920
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars. But you still say it's your aim, so

432
00:27:15.240 --> 00:27:16.079
<v Speaker 2>we'll take that as read.

433
00:27:18.440 --> 00:27:21.519
<v Speaker 1>There's there's, there's, there's what doge I mean? I fail?

434
00:27:21.559 --> 00:27:25.759
<v Speaker 1>You're somewhat trapped in the NPC dialogue tree of a

435
00:27:25.799 --> 00:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>traditional book journalist, so it's difficult when when I'm conversing

436
00:27:30.680 --> 00:27:33.279
<v Speaker 1>with someone who's trapped the dialogue of a conventional journalist

437
00:27:33.559 --> 00:27:39.599
<v Speaker 1>because it's like talking to a computer. So, uh, doge

438
00:27:39.640 --> 00:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is an advisory group. We are doing the best we

439
00:27:42.440 --> 00:27:46.559
<v Speaker 1>can as an advisory group. The progress made thus far

440
00:27:46.599 --> 00:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as an advisory group is excellent. I don't think any

441
00:27:49.720 --> 00:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>advisory group has done better in the history of advisory

442
00:27:51.920 --> 00:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>groups of the government. Now, we we do not make

443
00:27:57.200 --> 00:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the laws, nor do we control the the judiciary, nor

444
00:28:01.240 --> 00:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>do we control the executive branch. We are simply advisors.

445
00:28:05.400 --> 00:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>In that context, we're doing very well. Beyond that, we

446
00:28:09.279 --> 00:28:13.279
<v Speaker 1>cannot we cannot take action beyond that because we are

447
00:28:13.279 --> 00:28:16.839
<v Speaker 1>not some sort of imperial dictator of the government. There

448
00:28:16.839 --> 00:28:20.799
<v Speaker 1>are three branches of government that that art some degree

449
00:28:20.920 --> 00:28:26.319
<v Speaker 1>opposed to that level of cost savings. Unless let's let's

450
00:28:26.400 --> 00:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>let's not criticize whether there's a four trillion. Instead look

451
00:28:32.480 --> 00:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at the fact that our sixty billion has been saved

452
00:28:34.960 --> 00:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and more. We say too.

453
00:28:37.440 --> 00:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>And as I said, I think everyone can agree that

454
00:28:40.039 --> 00:28:44.400
<v Speaker 2>cutting waste and indeed fraud in any government and being

455
00:28:44.720 --> 00:28:49.440
<v Speaker 2>responsible with taxpace money is a very good thing. So yes,

456
00:28:49.599 --> 00:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I can see, I can see that you're proud of

457
00:28:51.480 --> 00:28:56.680
<v Speaker 2>that work. I do want to ask you about USAID

458
00:28:56.880 --> 00:28:59.599
<v Speaker 2>and the comments that Bill Gates made the other day,

459
00:28:59.680 --> 00:29:02.960
<v Speaker 2>which I and I know that you called himim. I

460
00:29:03.000 --> 00:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>know you've said that already.

461
00:29:05.880 --> 00:29:10.279
<v Speaker 1>I wanted and I'm just who does Biggs think he

462
00:29:10.400 --> 00:29:13.759
<v Speaker 1>is to make comments about the welfare of children, given

463
00:29:14.039 --> 00:29:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that he is before quent to Jeffreystein.

464
00:29:17.720 --> 00:29:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, he's he's he said he regrets those and

465
00:29:23.400 --> 00:29:26.640
<v Speaker 2>he's spent. He spent. He spent a lot. He spent

466
00:29:26.680 --> 00:29:30.519
<v Speaker 2>a lot of his own money on on philanthropy around

467
00:29:30.519 --> 00:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the world over the years. My question to you is

468
00:29:33.279 --> 00:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>have you looked at the data to check if he

469
00:29:36.079 --> 00:29:39.039
<v Speaker 2>might be right that the cuts to U s a

470
00:29:39.160 --> 00:29:43.279
<v Speaker 2>I D might cost millions of lives.

471
00:29:44.480 --> 00:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I'd like him to pursure us any any evidence

472
00:29:48.039 --> 00:29:52.359
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever that that is true. It's false. The what we're

473
00:29:52.400 --> 00:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>found with US cuts and by the way, they haven't

474
00:29:54.880 --> 00:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>an open cut. The of the U s a D

475
00:29:57.799 --> 00:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that we found to be even slightly useful, we're transferred

476
00:30:01.720 --> 00:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Stage Profits, so they've not been deleted. They've

477
00:30:04.000 --> 00:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>cerly been transferred to the stage department. But many many

478
00:30:07.400 --> 00:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>times over with U SAD and other organizations when we've

479
00:30:11.039 --> 00:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>when they said, oh, well, this is going to help

480
00:30:13.880 --> 00:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, children, or it's going to help some uh

481
00:30:19.400 --> 00:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>disease eradication or something like that. And then when we

482
00:30:22.039 --> 00:30:25.759
<v Speaker 1>ask for any evidence whatsoever, I say, well, please connect

483
00:30:25.799 --> 00:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>us with this group of children so we can talk

484
00:30:28.200 --> 00:30:31.079
<v Speaker 1>to them and understand more about their issue. We get nothing.

485
00:30:32.559 --> 00:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't We don't even try to prevent a show.

486
00:30:35.680 --> 00:30:38.599
<v Speaker 1>We should come up with a with a show orphan

487
00:30:38.880 --> 00:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>meaning like it's sort of like, well, can we at

488
00:30:41.240 --> 00:30:44.519
<v Speaker 1>least see a few kids, like where are they if

489
00:30:44.519 --> 00:30:47.079
<v Speaker 1>they're in trouble, we'd like to talk to them and

490
00:30:47.119 --> 00:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to their caregivers. And then we get a thing

491
00:30:49.720 --> 00:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as a response, because it's what we find is an

492
00:30:54.279 --> 00:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of fraud and graft.

493
00:30:57.519 --> 00:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I put this example.

494
00:30:58.759 --> 00:31:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Very little actually gets of it, kiuse if anything at all.

495
00:31:01.880 --> 00:31:05.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me put this example to you because you

496
00:31:05.160 --> 00:31:06.799
<v Speaker 2>grew up in South Africa, so you will know the

497
00:31:06.839 --> 00:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>impact of HIV AIDS well. And this is why I

498
00:31:09.519 --> 00:31:13.599
<v Speaker 2>asked about the data the US led on international efforts

499
00:31:13.640 --> 00:31:18.119
<v Speaker 2>to combat HIV AIDS treatment prevention. And there's an initiative

500
00:31:18.160 --> 00:31:21.039
<v Speaker 2>called pet File which is credited with saving twenty six

501
00:31:21.079 --> 00:31:24.119
<v Speaker 2>million lives in the last twenty years. It was part

502
00:31:24.160 --> 00:31:26.799
<v Speaker 2>of the foreign aid freeze. Then there was a limited waiver.

503
00:31:27.279 --> 00:31:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Its services are disrupted, and unaid says if permanly discontinued,

504
00:31:33.960 --> 00:31:37.359
<v Speaker 2>there will be another four million AIDS related deaths by

505
00:31:37.400 --> 00:31:41.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty nine. So if you look at that example,

506
00:31:41.559 --> 00:31:44.759
<v Speaker 2>which is backed up by data. In twenty twenty three,

507
00:31:44.839 --> 00:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and thirty thousand people died of AIDS related illnesses,

508
00:31:49.000 --> 00:31:51.519
<v Speaker 2>then perhaps Bill Gates's figures are not wrong. Millions of

509
00:31:51.559 --> 00:31:52.519
<v Speaker 2>lives could be lost.

510
00:31:54.799 --> 00:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the program, the AIDS medication program, is continuing,

511
00:32:04.359 --> 00:32:08.319
<v Speaker 1>so your fund moral premise is wrong. It is continuing. Now,

512
00:32:08.480 --> 00:32:09.839
<v Speaker 1>do you have another example.

513
00:32:09.640 --> 00:32:17.519
<v Speaker 2>Not in its entirety, not in its entirety the program

514
00:32:17.519 --> 00:32:20.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a limited waiver, and UNAIDS have said that not

515
00:32:21.240 --> 00:32:24.039
<v Speaker 2>all of the services that were previously funded by USA

516
00:32:24.160 --> 00:32:27.119
<v Speaker 2>IDEA continuing. So that's that's why, that's why I put

517
00:32:27.200 --> 00:32:28.119
<v Speaker 2>that example to you.

518
00:32:28.519 --> 00:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, which ones aren't being funded?

519
00:32:30.519 --> 00:32:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll fix it right now for okay. Well, actually they're

520
00:32:34.759 --> 00:32:37.839
<v Speaker 2>all on the un unaid's website, so you'll be able

521
00:32:37.839 --> 00:32:39.599
<v Speaker 2>to see them. But mostly they are to deal with

522
00:32:40.039 --> 00:32:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Mostly they are to do with prevention, and for example,

523
00:32:42.759 --> 00:32:46.519
<v Speaker 2>the rollout of a drug called glenna kappavir, which was

524
00:32:46.559 --> 00:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>hailed as one of the biggest breakthroughs against AIDS for

525
00:32:50.759 --> 00:32:52.799
<v Speaker 2>many years, which came out last year. So if you

526
00:32:52.839 --> 00:32:56.480
<v Speaker 2>are perhaps, I'm sure UNA's would be delighted if you're

527
00:32:56.519 --> 00:32:57.720
<v Speaker 2>able to look at that again.

528
00:32:58.759 --> 00:33:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but well, if if in fact this is true,

529
00:33:01.279 --> 00:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>which I doubt it is, then we'll affix it.

530
00:33:02.960 --> 00:33:11.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Fine, So finally, political, your political influence. I wondered

531
00:33:11.279 --> 00:33:14.119
<v Speaker 2>whether you have decided yet how much you're going to

532
00:33:14.160 --> 00:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>spend on the upcoming midterms. Is it you spent a

533
00:33:21.039 --> 00:33:23.359
<v Speaker 2>lot more money on the last US election than you

534
00:33:23.480 --> 00:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>envisaged when you were speaking here three years ago. Are

535
00:33:26.960 --> 00:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>you going to continue to spend at that kind of

536
00:33:29.720 --> 00:33:32.079
<v Speaker 2>level on future elections?

537
00:33:34.039 --> 00:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of political spending, I'm going to

538
00:33:40.240 --> 00:33:41.559
<v Speaker 1>do a lot less in the future.

539
00:33:42.799 --> 00:33:43.480
<v Speaker 2>And why is that?

540
00:33:45.960 --> 00:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I've done enough?

541
00:33:50.119 --> 00:33:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Is it because of blowback?

542
00:33:55.000 --> 00:33:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Well? If I see a reason to do political spending

543
00:33:57.599 --> 00:34:00.319
<v Speaker 1>in the future, I will do it. An currently serious.

544
00:34:01.640 --> 00:34:05.680
<v Speaker 2>What about political influence beyond the US? How often do

545
00:34:05.720 --> 00:34:07.039
<v Speaker 2>you speak to President.

546
00:34:09.239 --> 00:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't speak to President Putin.

547
00:34:12.360 --> 00:34:14.039
<v Speaker 2>You've never spoken to President Putin.

548
00:34:16.320 --> 00:34:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I was on a video caller with him once about

549
00:34:18.119 --> 00:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>five years ago.

550
00:34:19.519 --> 00:34:22.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the only that's the president.

551
00:34:23.880 --> 00:34:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you must I get it.

552
00:34:26.280 --> 00:34:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Actually, i've heard you. I've heard you speak about it.

553
00:34:28.760 --> 00:34:31.280
<v Speaker 2>For example, in your West Point speech, you said, oh,

554
00:34:31.280 --> 00:34:35.119
<v Speaker 2>I challenged President Putin to uh to was it an

555
00:34:35.199 --> 00:34:37.199
<v Speaker 2>arm wrestle? And I know the Wall Street Journal has

556
00:34:37.199 --> 00:34:40.960
<v Speaker 2>reported your reported conversations. If you're if you're saying they

557
00:34:41.000 --> 00:34:43.119
<v Speaker 2>haven't happened other than once, I'll take that as read.

558
00:34:44.519 --> 00:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Is there a worse publication on the face of the

559
00:34:46.719 --> 00:34:49.159
<v Speaker 1>earth than the Wall Street Journal? I wouldn't use that

560
00:34:49.199 --> 00:34:55.199
<v Speaker 1>tolign up my cage for paragraphics that that that newspaper

561
00:34:55.360 --> 00:35:00.639
<v Speaker 1>is the worst newspaper in the world. And there's you know,

562
00:35:00.719 --> 00:35:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if there's one newspaper that should be pro capitalist, it's

563
00:35:03.760 --> 00:35:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the one of Wall Street in the name, But it isn't.

564
00:35:07.960 --> 00:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So I have the very lowest opinion of the Wall

565
00:35:10.960 --> 00:35:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal. Absolutely answers, and you clearly have believed the

566
00:35:14.280 --> 00:35:17.079
<v Speaker 1>tripe that you've written, that you've written newspapers I.

567
00:35:17.000 --> 00:35:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Read, I read very widely, and I'm putting these questions

568
00:35:20.320 --> 00:35:22.320
<v Speaker 2>to you so that you have an opportunity to respond

569
00:35:22.320 --> 00:35:25.119
<v Speaker 2>to them. Which you are and for which we're all

570
00:35:25.440 --> 00:35:27.960
<v Speaker 2>grateful to hear. Your response is, okay, we are. We

571
00:35:28.000 --> 00:35:28.679
<v Speaker 2>are out of time.

572
00:35:28.760 --> 00:35:33.159
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned it challenging. I did so on on

573
00:35:33.199 --> 00:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the X platform. I challenged Vladimir put over the I

574
00:35:40.000 --> 00:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk to him. That was a post on the

575
00:35:42.400 --> 00:35:43.039
<v Speaker 1>X platform.

576
00:35:43.440 --> 00:35:45.840
<v Speaker 2>That's why. That's why I asked you. And you've and

577
00:35:45.880 --> 00:35:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you've clorified and explained. Thank you. That's that's why I

578
00:35:48.880 --> 00:35:53.159
<v Speaker 2>was asking whether you have had reported conversations and and

579
00:35:53.199 --> 00:35:55.480
<v Speaker 2>you said, we have a.

580
00:35:55.719 --> 00:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, legacy media lize.

581
00:35:58.800 --> 00:36:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, listen. I thought I might give Grock the last

582
00:36:01.920 --> 00:36:07.280
<v Speaker 2>word because when I asked Groc what your hardest challenge is,

583
00:36:07.800 --> 00:36:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it said the strain of managing multiple high stake ventures

584
00:36:12.679 --> 00:36:17.199
<v Speaker 2>made financial regulatory in public relations crises. And I wondered

585
00:36:17.320 --> 00:36:22.119
<v Speaker 2>whether you recognize that characterization and whether you do think

586
00:36:22.199 --> 00:36:25.559
<v Speaker 2>that this is a pivotal year in your life.

587
00:36:28.320 --> 00:36:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, every has been somewhat piddle, and this one's no different.

588
00:36:34.199 --> 00:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of interesting things that probably our accomplish,

589
00:36:38.559 --> 00:36:47.519
<v Speaker 1>this here there getting starships two be fully reusable, so

590
00:36:47.559 --> 00:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that we catch both the booster and the ship, which

591
00:36:51.719 --> 00:36:54.119
<v Speaker 1>will be the first fully reusable or little rocket ever

592
00:36:54.239 --> 00:36:57.559
<v Speaker 1>in history, which would be a profound breakthrough as the

593
00:36:57.639 --> 00:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>essential breakthrough necessarily to make multi planetarian ultimately become a

594
00:37:01.760 --> 00:37:07.039
<v Speaker 1>space bearing civilization. We've got neural link which is now

595
00:37:07.119 --> 00:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>helped by patients restore capability using the left of the implant,

596
00:37:15.039 --> 00:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>where they're able to control a computer simply by thinking.

597
00:37:19.280 --> 00:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll be doing our first patient to restore blank just

598
00:37:25.480 --> 00:37:29.760
<v Speaker 1>restore to restore site with our blind site implant, which

599
00:37:29.800 --> 00:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is the end of this year early next. In fact,

600
00:37:32.840 --> 00:37:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that that first patient might be in the U a E.

601
00:37:35.559 --> 00:37:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Since we have a relationship with you a E and

602
00:37:37.239 --> 00:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Clinic clinic there. The I think what's running

603
00:37:43.920 --> 00:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>on the AI front, we are close to what you

604
00:37:47.000 --> 00:37:52.159
<v Speaker 1>might call a g I or or or digital super intelligence,

605
00:37:54.079 --> 00:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think we'll see that we are seeing an

606
00:37:56.360 --> 00:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>explosion in digital superintelligence here. And then we've got to HESLA,

607
00:38:00.519 --> 00:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the what will be launching anti based autonomy basically self

608
00:38:04.519 --> 00:38:07.519
<v Speaker 1>driving cars with no one in them in Austin next month.

609
00:38:08.280 --> 00:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a big year for sure. Many other

610
00:38:12.519 --> 00:38:16.199
<v Speaker 1>things on the in the in the works too. Okay,

611
00:38:16.639 --> 00:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm a technologist first and foremost.

612
00:38:19.440 --> 00:38:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, thank you very much for joining us here

613
00:38:21.719 --> 00:38:23.599
<v Speaker 2>at Cutter Economic Forum. Thank you
