Speaker 1: One, and we are live today is October. Can you
Speaker 1: believe it? October ninth?
Speaker 2: No, I can't.
Speaker 1: Twenty twenty four. It's eight three two am and we
Speaker 1: are here once again with Diego Garcia from bulletproofpub dot com.
Speaker 1: And I just want to say real quick, let yesterday
Speaker 1: lots of support came in for the computer drive far away.
Speaker 2: Nice.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I figure about two hundred away. I want to
Speaker 1: stay here about two hundred away. I will know when
Speaker 1: it actually transfers, because Stripe takes a piece, and you know,
Speaker 1: I give two percent to the Christian Gifts and go
Speaker 1: and all that the hour Christian. For those of you
Speaker 1: who didn't know, two percent isn't a lot, but I
Speaker 1: wasn't getting a lot way back when when I first started.
Speaker 1: I just never changed it. So so there you have
Speaker 1: it there. They are probably going to post sometime in
Speaker 1: the middle of next week, so then I'll be able
Speaker 1: to tell you exactly what the what the total is.
Speaker 2: That we have. That's good that people are contributing. Good
Speaker 2: to hear.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So thank you to everybody out there. Thank you
Speaker 1: bush Master, thank you Blake, Blake with a cool way
Speaker 1: of spelling your name, Thank you, And we will continue
Speaker 1: to truck forward. It's only two hundred left right around there,
Speaker 1: and then we'll be able to start purchasing these items
Speaker 1: and get this thing going. I'm excited just to try
Speaker 1: to do this. I've seen people do it. I know
Speaker 1: that I was an electrician, but it's not the same thing.
Speaker 1: But I was always into electronics, and I was always
Speaker 1: into tinkering with stuff like that. And funny enough, we've
Speaker 1: been talking about bay Shomp and pastor I for the
Speaker 1: longest time. When I was living in Upstate New York,
Speaker 1: was doing fermentation experience of my own. I was making appleside,
Speaker 1: heard applesiter, appleside wine, blueberry wine, and more recently a
Speaker 1: few years back, I actually went through the whole sterilization
Speaker 1: process of bringing my celium to fruition of mushrooms, and
Speaker 1: that was I had less. I had less luck with
Speaker 1: the Lion's main a little better turkey tails. Certain ones
Speaker 1: I couldn't do because I didn't have logs and there's
Speaker 1: limited access to natural life out here in the desert,
Speaker 1: so some things have to be in the soil for
Speaker 1: the symbiosis to occur, so I couldn't make certain things.
Speaker 1: But yeah, it was fun. It was a learning process
Speaker 1: for sure, and keeping them not getting you know, mold
Speaker 1: or some other type of fungal bacteria on them, or
Speaker 1: backed fungus or bacteria on them, and they actually excrete
Speaker 1: their own Like I don't want to call it antibiotic,
Speaker 1: because I don't believe that that's what it is, but
Speaker 1: it's something similar to that. It excretes like a yellowish
Speaker 1: stuff to it. The nicillium does as it's growing, just
Speaker 1: to keep itself healthy. It's pretty interesting, that's cool.
Speaker 2: I'm I'm searching on my bookshelf here for a gut
Speaker 2: biology book that somebody gave me probably twenty years ago.
Speaker 2: And I agree that this fermentation process, like we do
Speaker 2: our own bread. My wife makes our own bread and
Speaker 2: oh yeah, it's a sour dough and it's the live
Speaker 2: bread that you have to let cultivate and it's it's
Speaker 2: starting to turn my gut issues around awesome. And yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm a big fan of fermentation absolutely. See.
Speaker 1: I don't even drink anymore, but making it is fun,
Speaker 1: you know, So it's still kind of nice. And every
Speaker 1: once in a while, like well, I'll have like some
Speaker 1: pomegranate juice and my fridge and then it doesn't get
Speaker 1: used very fast. There's a little tends to it. You
Speaker 1: can tell there's a little tiny bit in there. Like
Speaker 1: I used to do kombucha too. I forgot about that.
Speaker 1: I used to make kimbucha all the time, right, I
Speaker 1: mean I made that in San Diego.
Speaker 2: Well, everything starts with your gut. Your health starts there.
Speaker 2: How you think is totally dependent on your Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: you know so.
Speaker 1: And doctor Monzo and I were talking about this today,
Speaker 1: like he's for the last two years or so been
Speaker 1: taking the copper something and saying he's only now at
Speaker 1: about ninety eight percent of what he's supposed to be
Speaker 1: for levels. So it took it takes a long time
Speaker 1: to get yourself back there. But he said, his fluidity
Speaker 1: of thought, his mental cognition is so much better now,
Speaker 1: and he's already brilliant human being. So just imagine if
Speaker 1: that's really why everybody's in this lull, that people don't
Speaker 1: understand things and don't get it is because of our
Speaker 1: nutrition and suppression of our microzyma. What's that one called.
Speaker 2: Exactly this is that's exactly what this book goes into.
Speaker 2: Gut and psychology syndrome. And so she's making a connection
Speaker 2: to you know, add and all of these things that
Speaker 2: are rampant in our society. And she's saying that it's
Speaker 2: all in our gut, all starts in our gut, and
Speaker 2: how well, yeah, and what we eat.
Speaker 1: And that makes sense too, because you can still apply
Speaker 1: the vaccine damage to that because it does destroy your gut. Feel,
Speaker 1: it paralyzes all kinds of horrible things, depending on what
Speaker 1: it's gonna attack and how your body is going to
Speaker 1: respond to it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so your natural immunity is going to start
Speaker 2: there too, And so can see that they're breaking down
Speaker 2: our defenses and underneath, you know, when we're defenseless, they're
Speaker 2: throwing all these toxic things into our gut. And that's
Speaker 2: not just vaccines. That's b Yeah. Now you go eat
Speaker 2: at McDonald's, that's killing your gut any fast food joint,
Speaker 2: you know.
Speaker 1: But even the difference between the shy and eating is
Speaker 1: Lisa is going through your laboratories and your digestion process,
Speaker 1: and your body is supposed to break down and pull
Speaker 1: away as much of the toxins as it can recognize.
Speaker 1: You just go bypass that directly into your bloodshedmer your muscle.
Speaker 1: There's none of those safeguards. It's already in there doing damage.
Speaker 2: So right, so.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about what we came here to discuss today. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: and how are you doing.
Speaker 2: I'm doing great, couldn't complain.
Speaker 1: I miss you week, I do.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would like to do this more. Actually, I'm
Speaker 2: thinking about doing my own show, the History of Propaganda,
Speaker 2: something similar to what you're doing here, just to get
Speaker 2: informational quicker.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you still have that channel up right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, people go check that out YouTube, it's still there.
Speaker 2: The History of Propaganda. We go into all kinds of
Speaker 2: interesting sort of docu style short videos, the origins of
Speaker 2: CFR and all of those things, and yeah, it's very informative.
Speaker 2: We don't do a lot there. Just actually, starting at
Speaker 2: about this time of the year, we start to ramp
Speaker 2: up our work and you're probably not going to see
Speaker 2: anything new there for a while because I'm working on
Speaker 2: this book.
Speaker 1: But yeah, they don't even pop you up. Is it
Speaker 1: the history of propaganda? The okay, yeah, you have to
Speaker 1: be exact to certain things. They suppress you.
Speaker 2: Sure do you miss a hyphen and you'll never find
Speaker 2: things often.
Speaker 1: Yeah you're not. Yeah, I'm scrolling and then I type
Speaker 1: really I guess I'll put the word channel afterwards.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we go into the progressive era, Woodrow Wilson, the
Speaker 2: men that there you are surrounding him, these American progressives.
Speaker 2: This is really what we've been put together. The House
Speaker 2: of Truth history there. So if anybody's going to the
Speaker 2: History of Propaganda, definitely check out the two House of Truths.
Speaker 2: This is usual work in progress. Yeah, that's me, all right.
Speaker 2: So I am putting down one by one these rise
Speaker 2: of the Expert series that we were doing with Andy.
Speaker 2: I'm putting them on the History of prop Channel for everybody,
Speaker 2: just at a convenience. Just it takes time. And if
Speaker 2: anybody has a downloader better than why to Mate, let
Speaker 2: me know, because it's just such a hassle and you
Speaker 2: can only get three sixty, but it has come seven or
Speaker 2: ten eighty because we use, you know, documents, and I
Speaker 2: want to be able to zoom in and have people
Speaker 2: read for themselves.
Speaker 1: And so what are you using. I'm sorry, I didn't
Speaker 1: catch that.
Speaker 2: Why to mate and downloader. So you take the u
Speaker 2: URL and you put the u L in in there
Speaker 2: and you and it'll download into your hard drive so
Speaker 2: that you can have that video and then it's even
Speaker 2: if it's wipe from the Internet, you still possess it.
Speaker 2: But they've made it very difficult through pop ups.
Speaker 1: And so what do you normally do, like if you
Speaker 1: are you able to do a live stream with the
Speaker 1: channel because I know they have restrictions on YouTube and
Speaker 1: you do live stream with the amount of subscribers that
Speaker 1: you have.
Speaker 2: No, no, you need one hundred thousand.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's there around I thought, yeah.
Speaker 2: So I got five ninety five. I've been up here
Speaker 2: for a while.
Speaker 1: They changed that recently because it used to be for monetization, right,
Speaker 1: so because I think it was a lower number before.
Speaker 1: It just had to not have any issues with her
Speaker 1: and then and then they changed it to her. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they want to limit people who actually go live. There's
Speaker 1: other ways to do it through. I mean you could
Speaker 1: go on Issue does live now too, and so does
Speaker 1: I mean you could you have Twitter, I mean you
Speaker 1: have a very Facebook and then if that saves on
Speaker 1: to your computer anyway, then you can have it at
Speaker 1: whatever ten ADP or whatever else you're going to do it.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, So that's where we're at. I'm in the
Speaker 2: middle of doing a book, The Rise of the Expert.
Speaker 2: How a US Supreme Court justice founded our modern day
Speaker 2: social contract, and we've been through a lot of that
Speaker 2: with you, Daniel on your show. We've got it up
Speaker 2: at bulletproofpub dot com, the entire ten part series with
Speaker 2: all the source material, all their seats, showing that beyond
Speaker 2: a doubt that a US Supreme Court Justice, the first
Speaker 2: Jewish US Supreme Court Justice and Frank Is confirmed in
Speaker 2: nineteen sixteen, was already the leader of international Zionism and
Speaker 2: the architect of the Federal Reserve. So go and check
Speaker 2: those out Bulletproof pub dot com. And so what we're
Speaker 2: going to talk about today is just an extension of this.
Speaker 2: We're just further elaborating and breaking down all of this information, showing.
Speaker 1: How details and so many moving parts that it's important
Speaker 1: to catch all of them because later on we'll be
Speaker 1: talking about another topic and it'll come back again.
Speaker 2: Yes, and so pay attention to the words that they use.
Speaker 2: I'm pointing out today and I have been over the
Speaker 2: last how many ever podcasts the link in languages.
Speaker 1: So let me just stop real quick and say run BMC,
Speaker 1: you are the man guy with the go pro Provision show,
Speaker 1: and thank you to all the guys over there on Twitter,
Speaker 1: who I never shout out, and I apologize for sharing
Speaker 1: around my links. I appreciate that. That's awesome that you
Speaker 1: do that. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Very cool. So I think I'm going to start where
Speaker 2: we have been starting last couple of weeks. The American
Speaker 2: progress was particularly Walter Littmann, and so I just want
Speaker 2: to show see if I can be a little more
Speaker 2: fluid this week. I want to show sort of the
Speaker 2: origins of this in some of Litman's writings. So we're
Speaker 2: going to start with Liberty in the News real, Yeah,
Speaker 2: can you see that? In me? Let's see maybe a
Speaker 2: single page there is Liberty and News at the top.
Speaker 2: So this is directly out of his book. So I
Speaker 2: would I would suggest that this is a primary source.
Speaker 1: Circa what nineteen twenty something, Okay, Yeah, I can get
Speaker 1: them for yours as they're ramping up, and that's an
Speaker 1: important aspect to mind. And actually, as they're already planning
Speaker 1: their global domination, they're ramping up and sending all the
Speaker 1: pieces in the proper positions, putting all the dominoes when
Speaker 1: they must.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Liberty in the News published nineteen twenty So this
Speaker 2: is the publication right before his famous public opinion. This
Speaker 2: is the leading book in media studies. We've shown this
Speaker 2: in the last show I think now Columbia University. James W.
Speaker 2: Carry the guy that invents the ritual formation of mainstream media,
Speaker 2: communit communication. So they use the term ritual.
Speaker 1: It's crazy.
Speaker 2: So they're they're obviously referring to like nightly news and
Speaker 2: just inundating you on a consistent frequency. So every night
Speaker 2: or every morning or three times a night, they're hitting
Speaker 2: you with news. And now we see it's all the
Speaker 2: time everywhere.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows. They get trained. They know that's the time
Speaker 1: to do a certain thing. It's training if you have love. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm going to read from this here and just
Speaker 2: to set the tone for what we're going to talk
Speaker 2: about the rest of the day. Here is where he
Speaker 2: coins the term manufacture of consent. So those that are
Speaker 2: familiar with Noam Chomsky's work in the eighties nineties, this
Speaker 2: is where he actually gets that term. He's referring back
Speaker 2: to the father of modern journalism, Walter Littman.
Speaker 1: If ever there was a guy who personified controlled opposition,
Speaker 1: it would be Jomsky for sure.
Speaker 2: And what is he doing? What is what is he known?
Speaker 2: For pointing out that the media is corrupted. So that's
Speaker 2: a it's a forum, and it's a tradition or a
Speaker 2: valued institution in Western culture if it wasn't so compromised today.
Speaker 2: But the fact, going back to the basics of what
Speaker 2: the media was supposed to be, the fourth Estate was
Speaker 2: supposed to actually keep tabs on the government and incorporations
Speaker 2: and then to report what was true and what if it,
Speaker 2: you know, was important to the public good.
Speaker 1: If I may bring up Lincoln again, that all changed
Speaker 1: during his regime because he jailed over forty thousand and
Speaker 1: many many many journalists, many newspapers that the Jeffersonian was
Speaker 1: shut down by him. He was basically hunting people down
Speaker 1: that didn't agree with his rule. Yeah, And so basically
Speaker 1: back then he gutted out all the honest journalists, and
Speaker 1: honest journalists found out when they went to these these
Speaker 1: uh basically goolags, you know, they were they were, they were,
Speaker 1: they were you know, memory holding, kicked out of society,
Speaker 1: brought somewhere else, uh basket what they call it, bast deals, Yeah,
Speaker 1: bass deals. Honest journalism journalists found out what happens when
Speaker 1: you're an honest journalist and forever was it was the
Speaker 1: terrain changed.
Speaker 2: Well, I knew that Lincoln was involved, but I didn't
Speaker 2: know he was that involved. And that's that's really incredible.
Speaker 2: He's definitely part of this progressive era. You know, the
Speaker 2: American progressives take their cues a lot from the Lincoln era.
Speaker 2: We've already shown that brandeis his uncle, the guy that
Speaker 2: he names or changes his middle name to, was one
Speaker 2: of the first Zionists, and he's in Lincoln's administration. No,
Speaker 2: this is uh. I was thinking Lewis Lewis. So it's
Speaker 2: l E w I s Lewis neptally n A p
Speaker 2: h t A l I dem bits d e b
Speaker 2: I t z or z in America. So that's his uncle.
Speaker 2: That's who he changes. This is who BRANDI is, the
Speaker 2: leader of international Zionism, changes his middle name in the
Speaker 2: in his sixties in honor of his Zionist uncle that
Speaker 2: was in the administration of Lincoln. So we see a
Speaker 2: total connection there going back, and we're we're busy there.
Speaker 2: We are researching presently and as we gather information, we
Speaker 2: will present it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and on my side, I'm gonna I'm gonna work
Speaker 1: on the what happened leading up to Darwinism and what
Speaker 1: happened after that was set in motion. And also and
Speaker 1: also the X and what its symbolism is, because I
Speaker 1: think it also is a symbol for the cross roads,
Speaker 1: which is a very occulted thing. You go to the
Speaker 1: crossroads in the middle of the night to sell your
Speaker 1: soul to the devil. So you have these X clubs,
Speaker 1: you have the Twitter turning into X, all kinds of
Speaker 1: strange things going on.
Speaker 2: Well, that'd be interesting. That's interesting, Daniel, because I'm just
Speaker 2: going through a book here on the American progressives called
Speaker 2: The Crossroads of Liberalism, and this is the story of
Speaker 2: how the definition of liberalism changed at the beginning of
Speaker 2: the twentieth century. And these are the men that were responsible.
Speaker 1: Oh so for people who want to reference on what
Speaker 1: I talked about with Lincoln, there's a ton of you
Speaker 1: might not want to hear it, but it's in Crimes
Speaker 1: and cover Ups in American Politics, and it is by
Speaker 1: Donald Jeffries, who I should call contact again and see
Speaker 1: if he wants come on the show.
Speaker 2: Can you see what I have?
Speaker 1: Crimes and cover Ups in American Politics? He did another
Speaker 1: one called Hidden History before that, so that one went
Speaker 1: from after Lincoln's is set, like from Lincoln's set, not
Speaker 1: Lincoln's jfk assassination, up to like twenty twelve or like that.
Speaker 1: And then the other one started in seventeen seventy six
Speaker 1: to sixty three.
Speaker 2: Right, well, I'll have to check that out. So then,
Speaker 2: so we'll start here. Everywhere today men are conscious that
Speaker 2: somehow they must deal with questions more intricate than any
Speaker 2: that church or school had prepared them to understand. Increasingly
Speaker 2: they know that they cannot understand them if the facts
Speaker 2: are not quickly and steadily available. Increasingly they are baffled
Speaker 2: because the facts are not available, and they are wondering
Speaker 2: whether government by consent can survive in a time when
Speaker 2: the manufacturer of consent is an unregulated private enterprise. So
Speaker 2: everybody points to his public opinion as the book that
Speaker 2: he coined the term manufacture of consent. But I went
Speaker 2: through Lipman's all of his work, and I found it
Speaker 2: here one book before that. Okay, So.
Speaker 1: These primary sources are important, especially when they themselves are
Speaker 1: speaking right, hiring an argue that at that point, yeah.
Speaker 2: This is a primary source. This is why I go here,
Speaker 2: because you know, a deductive logical journey of asking the who, why, where, when,
Speaker 2: and using primary source material, you're going to get the
Speaker 2: closest it to the truth as any other method. And
Speaker 2: actually we can talk about the historical method too here
Speaker 2: as we go through this process, because I have a
Speaker 2: tab here for it, because this is the method that
Speaker 2: I use and I just sort of found this this
Speaker 2: week that it goes all the way back to Greek philosophers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's funny how they bastardize that too. U.
Speaker 1: There's a schism there between the Hellenized Jews and the
Speaker 1: actual Greeks, and how they I would say, envious, jealous.
Speaker 1: The whole reason on the tour was developed was to
Speaker 1: put the Semitic type, if you will, at the center
Speaker 1: of everything because the Greeks were so and culture and
Speaker 1: philosophy and everything else, and they basically hijacked a whole
Speaker 1: lot of history and made their own. So there is
Speaker 1: when they when they project onto or absorb these elements,
Speaker 1: it's because of that time period. They don't know that,
Speaker 1: but that's how it's the hidden secret society hidden hand.
Speaker 1: People understand that quite well, and that's why they utilize
Speaker 1: our symbols against us.
Speaker 2: Too. Yeah, and similar things have happened with the scientific method,
Speaker 2: because the scientific method this gathering of empirical evidence to
Speaker 2: make sure that it's repeatable and observable. This is another
Speaker 2: great way to get to the truth. Yet we don't
Speaker 2: really talk about scientific method. We talk about scientism, right right.
Speaker 2: This mythical or this magical black magic seance that they're
Speaker 2: actually sort of covering over our society with.
Speaker 1: That's how that's how these these medical studies are always done.
Speaker 1: There's no control groups. Oh, we've isolated this virus that
Speaker 1: doesn't exist. How did you do that? Well, we use
Speaker 1: this computer model and we have this nice CGI graphic.
Speaker 1: So here you go. It's all cardoon.
Speaker 2: Yes, and this is this is the establishment of professionalism. Yeah,
Speaker 2: don't let what we're talking about on Sunday night. This
Speaker 2: is this is really one of the important things to
Speaker 2: understand is that you know the the word professionalism and
Speaker 2: and so you know in that twenty twenty two Walter
Speaker 2: Littmann conference, they're all talking about that, oh, in their
Speaker 2: crisis of the expert meeting that they're having.
Speaker 1: And let me just remind everybody out there there is
Speaker 1: when you want more, uh, diego, you can go over
Speaker 1: to bullproofpub dot com and you can check out his
Speaker 1: list of things, but also the Deep Shared podcast last Sunday,
Speaker 1: not this previous one. I had a chance to listen
Speaker 1: to the whole thing when I was on my San
Speaker 1: Diego drive, and it's well worth it. I would highly
Speaker 1: recommend it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all we're doing is unveiling how it all happened,
Speaker 2: the superstructure underneath it all. I mean, we can talk
Speaker 2: about cloud seating and P Diddy and all of these things,
Speaker 2: but I think it's really important to get a historical
Speaker 2: context of what you're talking about. And I just find
Speaker 2: that the more history you know that you can confirm
Speaker 2: as best as possible, as we are doing, the more
Speaker 2: clearer you see everything. So, like George Santiana said, he
Speaker 2: was a major influence on Walter Litman. He said, those
Speaker 2: that don't learn from their history are condemned to repeat it.
Speaker 2: And so we are pushing as hard as we can
Speaker 2: to inform people of this progressive movement that's still going on,
Speaker 2: still hiding underneath the current of mainstream narrative, and this
Speaker 2: is still today influencing both parties, and hardly anybody knows
Speaker 2: about it right now.
Speaker 1: Do you ever get the feeling like they're talking to
Speaker 1: each other and not us. So they're having a separate conversation.
Speaker 1: We're assumption. Our assumption is that they're because they drop
Speaker 1: a lot of philosophical good things, but they use them
Speaker 1: in the complete illogical, destructive way. So these are brilliant
Speaker 1: people with great ideas sometimes, but they're using them to
Speaker 1: dismantle and weaken society rather than building up. And so
Speaker 1: sometimes they'll have a quote and you're like, wow, that's wait,
Speaker 1: that was from him, But they're talking to one another,
Speaker 1: they're having a separate conversation. Yeah, he's dropping on it,
Speaker 1: but we think they're talking to all of us.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I hate to bring up Noam Chompsky a second time,
Speaker 2: but he is famous for saying that in political discourse,
Speaker 2: every word has two meanings, and so he's talking about
Speaker 2: a soapian language. And yeah, for sure there and look
Speaker 2: at the letters the text on that page. Those are
Speaker 2: all each individual symbols put together to communicate. Yep. So
Speaker 2: this is you know, a lot of times these books
Speaker 2: that they're put out, and in this case Liberty and
Speaker 2: the News, it's really supposed to be just sort of
Speaker 2: disseminated among themselves, the insiders. Many people just normal Larry
Speaker 2: lunchbuckets clamoring for Walter Lipman's latest book.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and they can do that right in front of
Speaker 1: us because of the language that they use, like you're saying,
Speaker 1: the double media.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and this is why Foreign Affairs Magazine can still
Speaker 2: be bought it chapters or whatever. I mean. This is
Speaker 2: just messaging between the initiated and the non initiated.
Speaker 1: And are people get upset when I point out that
Speaker 1: that's how the Total was written.
Speaker 2: To the unconscious versus the conscious. This is how every
Speaker 2: war was fought. So let me get through this first,
Speaker 2: uh quote with Litman because it's important. So I'm just
Speaker 2: excited since Yeah, no, it's great. Since the war, especially,
Speaker 2: editors have come to believe that their highest duty is
Speaker 2: not to report, but to instruct, not to print news,
Speaker 2: but to save civilization, not to publish what Benjamin Harris
Speaker 2: calls the circumstances of public affairs, both abroad and at home,
Speaker 2: but to keep the nation on the straight and narrow path.
Speaker 2: Like the kings of England. They have elected themselves defenders
Speaker 2: of the faith. He's talking about journalists. So for five
Speaker 2: years says mister Cobb, and he is working with Walter
Speaker 2: Lipman at the New York World. If you've watched the
Speaker 2: twenty twenty to Walter Lippman Conference of Crisis the Expert,
Speaker 2: Part one, we go into how they took the stained
Speaker 2: glass window from the New York World and brought it
Speaker 2: over to Columbia University. And they started that whole conference
Speaker 2: talking about Joseph Pulitzer and Walter Lippman. You know, they've
Speaker 2: romanticized the idea of Lipman doing his work underneath this
Speaker 2: great stained glass window. So New York World's important to understand.
Speaker 2: And so mister Cobb was one of the editors with Lipman,
Speaker 2: and he says here quote, there has been no free
Speaker 2: play of public opinion in the world. Confronted by the
Speaker 2: inexorable necessities of war, governments conscripted public opinion. It birst
Speaker 2: stepped it, meaning they stomped it. Yes, they taught it
Speaker 2: to stand at attention and salute. It sometimes seems that
Speaker 2: after the Armistice of nineteen eighteen, millions of America must
Speaker 2: have taken a vow that they would never again do
Speaker 2: any thinking for themselves. They were willing to die for
Speaker 2: their country but not willing to think for it. M okay,
Speaker 2: So that's that's pretty extraordinary. That's Cobb. That's a direct
Speaker 2: connection back to Litman New York World. And fancy enough,
Speaker 2: the New York World went under as Litman was working there,
Speaker 2: so we're not sure exactly all that went down, but
Speaker 2: they saved the stained glass window and put it up
Speaker 2: at the Columbia School of Journalism.
Speaker 1: Just like they'd bring around it. Well, I think it's
Speaker 1: an artificial one, but reconstruction of the art of ball
Speaker 1: or the arch of ball. They brought that to DC
Speaker 1: and set out in front of the Capitol. Yeah. Right,
Speaker 1: So it's portal. I mean, it's it's very symbolic.
Speaker 2: Yeah, for sure.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: And so Litman and Bernard Baruch Baroks really considered the
Speaker 2: uh oh yeah, uh, the lone Wolf of Wall Street
Speaker 2: Ian guy. He's in Paris, he's center of the group
Speaker 2: picture of the American delegation. He's Phi Beta Kappa. He
Speaker 2: doesn't live far from the House of Truth in Washington.
Speaker 2: So's yep, Phi Beta Kappa, New York City College. And
Speaker 2: so he and Lippmann are the ones that coined the
Speaker 2: term Cold War. So Baruk is the first one to
Speaker 2: say it, and then Lippman puts out a book called
Speaker 2: Cold War, So you can you know, just from that alone,
Speaker 2: I don't believe anything that ever came out of the
Speaker 2: Cold War narrative. And you know, when you look at
Speaker 2: some of the guys that started it, well.
Speaker 1: Look a look who created the Bolsheviks in the first place,
Speaker 1: speaking of funded.
Speaker 2: It and speaking of the word X. This is one
Speaker 2: of the wise men with the X article that talked
Speaker 2: about containment of Russia being necessary. And this is the
Speaker 2: whole thing that started the Cold War. And in the end,
Speaker 2: sometime in the seventies or eighties, well, the Cold War
Speaker 2: was still going on. He's he publicly admitted. He's like
Speaker 2: I was all both.
Speaker 1: Just like Paris was in a letter book from a
Speaker 1: goorchav that after the fact in the eighties. I don't
Speaker 1: know for the eighties and nineties, but it was basically
Speaker 1: laying out the plan that Soviet Russia is by no
Speaker 1: means over right.
Speaker 2: And you know, they're just they're all working together. It's
Speaker 2: very much like nineteen eighty four depicts, right.
Speaker 1: But I do have a feeling that Putin did did
Speaker 1: sincerely throw a wrench into that, and I think that's
Speaker 1: the reason why the people. But this could be part
Speaker 1: of the show too, but I just don't so.
Speaker 2: Well. When you read the big new Brazinski's work, The
Speaker 2: Grand Chessboard, he identifies containment even in the nineties as
Speaker 2: a critical thing. So you know, containment in that area
Speaker 2: around Russia is in between Western Europe and Russia. This
Speaker 2: is where the wars are being fought right now.
Speaker 1: He dings, Zabrinsky. I think someone said this yesterday that
Speaker 1: FEMA was created by Zabrinski.
Speaker 2: I cannot confirm that. I don't know for sure.
Speaker 1: I don't know if maybe I got the wrong name,
Speaker 1: but I appreciate it with him.
Speaker 2: But they said, okay, so we're going to just jump
Speaker 2: quickly to this pragmatism. Can you see that it's a
Speaker 2: wiki page.
Speaker 1: Oh no, I'm just looking at your still your Oh okay,
Speaker 1: it thinks here in the library of the news.
Speaker 2: Okay, so let me see here, because we want to
Speaker 2: just quickly talk about pragmatism, because this is another essential
Speaker 2: philosophical aspect. Something you can't see.
Speaker 1: But it's really pastardized that that could be a positive word,
Speaker 1: but it's most right.
Speaker 2: So when we look at pragmatism. This is invented by
Speaker 2: the Metaphysical Club. So I got that book on my shelf.
Speaker 2: I've shown it several times. This is written by Lewis
Speaker 2: menand he was the keynote speaker at this twenty twenty
Speaker 2: two Walter Littman conference. Interestingly enough, I.
Speaker 1: Mean it's too far away from Menan's New York, which
Speaker 1: is kind of funny.
Speaker 2: Well that's named after his family, yep. And Louis Minand
Speaker 2: is actually like Louis Manan the fourth, this guy that
Speaker 2: we're talking about that wrote the Metaphysical Club, and this
Speaker 2: is the introduction of philosophy into America, specifically pragmatism, because
Speaker 2: you can see there that those are the founders of pragmatism,
Speaker 2: Sanders Pierce, William James, John Dewey, John Dewey and so
Speaker 2: when they're talking about pragmatism, they're talking about utility. So
Speaker 2: we've talked about utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham last week, and everybody
Speaker 2: it must be of good, utility to the greater good,
Speaker 2: have civic duty. This is where these terms come from
Speaker 2: that we heard during COVID and I.
Speaker 1: Looked at the dates eighteen seventies. We're talking about not
Speaker 1: too long after the destruction of our country with the
Speaker 1: Civil War. And yes, it's not by accident that this
Speaker 1: happened this time period.
Speaker 2: And this is coming straight out of reconstruction. So that's
Speaker 2: exactly what it is. This is a movement coming right
Speaker 2: out of reconstruction. And so they can can see, if
Speaker 2: you've got enough of a clear long view, that this
Speaker 2: is all a move to reinvent America at the twentieth century.
Speaker 2: And they were successful because the twentieth century really became
Speaker 2: the American century. They're synonymous with each other.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we were already countered by that war. People think
Speaker 1: that were they set everybody free. No, they enslaved everybody.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So they talk about pragmatism being where you're being
Speaker 2: of good utility and the truth is determined by outcome.
Speaker 2: So if if if a hammer successfully drives a nail,
Speaker 2: then that hammer is therefore true. This is a This
Speaker 2: is kind of a quantum leap in the definition of true,
Speaker 2: and these guys are here doing it. So they talk
Speaker 2: about cash value, a person's cash value and people being agents.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's by no means cold and no solists to
Speaker 1: have the cash value of a human being right.
Speaker 2: And so, but this is this when we go back
Speaker 2: to George Bernard Shaw, he says, putting people in front
Speaker 2: of tribunals every five to seven years and justify your existence.
Speaker 2: And right at the end of that, he says that
Speaker 2: if you're not making us any money, then you're not
Speaker 2: doing yourself any good, and you'd you'd best be dead.
Speaker 2: He says in there there's an extraordinary number of people
Speaker 2: of whom I would like to kill. That's a quote.
Speaker 2: That's the Fabian society. So, uh, it's not personal memories
Speaker 2: that they're disinterested. They're clinicians. They don't really give a ship, right, Sure,
Speaker 2: this is what he's known as George George Shaw. If
Speaker 2: you were to sort of step into the mainstream and
Speaker 2: ask some people, they would say that's George Shaw, never
Speaker 2: the Bernard for some reason, I don't know. So do
Speaker 2: you see a definition of pragmatism there?
Speaker 1: Now is a philosophical tradition that first top line, are
Speaker 1: you looking at something else? Let me break it down? No,
Speaker 1: I'm probably right, Let's remove this one for now.
Speaker 2: Now, Yeah, so I'm probably not doing this right.
Speaker 1: There's that one where you can't see yourself, you can't
Speaker 1: back out into the next screen. So when you get
Speaker 1: to present and you hit share a screen, I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna walk get through the entire screen is the top right.
Speaker 1: You have to click the very word of the entire screen,
Speaker 1: and then you have to click the box to the left,
Speaker 1: and if.
Speaker 2: You should be able to go through the tabs right.
Speaker 1: Right, you'll just have to be on the screens that
Speaker 1: you're in task. But it'll show each one here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So anything that's on your screen will be will be showing.
Speaker 1: So if you are looking at us, you'll see that
Speaker 1: vortex of multiple things repeated. But if you're on the
Speaker 1: actro tab, you want good okay, and I from an
Speaker 1: audio there's a little slider, but get to that when
Speaker 1: we get there.
Speaker 2: So yeah, so pragmatism, I think we'll go right too. Beer.
Speaker 2: If we can find him here, just give me a sex.
Speaker 2: So Anthony Stafford Beer, We're gonna get into second phase cybernetics.
Speaker 2: I'm just messing this right out in face. Be patient
Speaker 2: with me, people.
Speaker 1: I talked about the macy connection there, and at first
Speaker 1: I was under the impression that that had something to
Speaker 1: do with because Macy's is in New York City, right
Speaker 1: like that's the founding, right, Yeah, it's it's a macy society.
Speaker 1: It's a little bit different. And uh, but Jason James
Speaker 1: Cash Penny j C. Penny, he was all sorts of
Speaker 1: you know, fraternal orders of many different kinds, including collegiate
Speaker 1: and in the in the Freemason's and he brought up
Speaker 1: like he he took a special interest in Sam Walton.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm, why yeah, Mark exactly.
Speaker 2: Okay, So I'm going to quickly bring up the American
Speaker 2: Academy of Arts and Sciences. You should see that now.
Speaker 2: And so we're talking about the scientific technical expert, the
Speaker 2: entering wedge, the building of the administrative state. And so
Speaker 2: they got to create administrative man, just like they had
Speaker 2: to create a person smart enough to press the buttons
Speaker 2: and move the levers at the factory at the turn
Speaker 2: of the century through the Industrial Revolution, this mechanical meeting
Speaker 2: of man and machine. This is really the first time
Speaker 2: that man and machine are making their acquaintance and this
Speaker 2: is where their whole relationship starts. Well, we see that
Speaker 2: once these second phase cybernetics come in the thirties, forties
Speaker 2: and fifties, they need to they need to create this
Speaker 2: homo economicus, this economic man, because if they're going to
Speaker 2: run a corporation with a bunch of compartmentalized little cubicles
Speaker 2: and everybody's just doing their little divisional labor intellectually, well
Speaker 2: let's establish the person that was going to be able
Speaker 2: to best operate.
Speaker 1: This was something that was co opted because I mean
Speaker 1: you have people like Hancock who risked everything and John
Speaker 1: Adams part of this founding of this. So this this
Speaker 1: looks like thing that was co opted after the eighties, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, the seventeen eighties is also when the
Speaker 1: Rothschilds converted to Frankism.
Speaker 2: So yeah, and reading more literature on the Freemasons, this
Speaker 2: is what they claim is that it was actually a
Speaker 2: beneficent organization. And I can't confirm.
Speaker 1: That they weren't as bad. They were secrets, of course,
Speaker 1: but they the over the throw and subversive aspects of
Speaker 1: them and completely changing their method and mode definitely came
Speaker 1: in with the Jesuits. Just band met in the seventeen
Speaker 1: seventy three and also the introduction of Frankist into it too.
Speaker 2: And the first lodge in America was seventeen seventeen, so
Speaker 2: it's actually not that old.
Speaker 1: If you're ever only seventeen seventeen in this country.
Speaker 2: Yeah, older obviously in Britain and Europe, but yeah, I
Speaker 2: confirmed that seventeen seventeen.
Speaker 1: Or under a different name like Rosicrusian or something.
Speaker 2: Could have been. Yeah, the official first Freemason Lodge seventeen seventeen.
Speaker 2: But that coincides with what we talked about earlier, the
Speaker 2: creation of Harvard, Yale, Williams, and William and Mary College.
Speaker 2: All before that, even so, the Academy established a visiting
Speaker 2: scholars program. Now, I just want to show you how
Speaker 2: the administrative state, and especially something like the American Academy
Speaker 2: of Arts and Sciences is filled with entering wedges, these
Speaker 2: scientific experts, and this organization as a whole has controlled
Speaker 2: arts and sciences really since it's inception seventeen eighty. I
Speaker 2: haven't gone back to the origins too much, but obviously
Speaker 2: today we see that it controls narratives. This is really
Speaker 2: you know, in part and parcel with the peer review system.
Speaker 2: You know, I'll pat your back if you pat mine.
Speaker 2: That we see pretty self evidently today. So we see
Speaker 2: some of the members, Charles Darwin and you start to
Speaker 2: see some similar names. Right, This is important so the
Speaker 2: members from seventeen eighty to twenty twenty one, the institutions
Speaker 2: that they come from are overwhelmingly Harvard, more than double
Speaker 2: the next one, which is MIT. And then you see
Speaker 2: Yale and Columbia on that list. But that's basically your
Speaker 2: IVY League, your top IVY League schools. And then you
Speaker 2: know Berkeley Stanford are hugely influential too, as is MIT.
Speaker 2: They're all on the first nodes of the Internet. Right,
Speaker 2: So then classes and specialties. You can see that everything
Speaker 2: is included here, mathematics, theirtology, social behavior, sciences, arts, public affairs.
Speaker 2: So we get into journalism, right, so you know all
Speaker 2: of the awards that are given out to all of
Speaker 2: these entering wedges. It's much like how Hollywood created the
Speaker 2: Academy Awards just to you know, congratulate themselves and have
Speaker 2: a night where it attracts people to it and glitz
Speaker 2: and glamour. It's the same exact method. And we see
Speaker 2: our friend Roscoe Pound was the president of nineteen thirty
Speaker 2: five nineteen thirty seven, thirty third degree Master Mason out
Speaker 2: of the Massachusetts Lodge, the largest, most influential one in
Speaker 2: the Western hemisphere.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was a Panopticon episode.
Speaker 2: Yes, so there you go. I just want to show
Speaker 2: that that, you know, when they talk about the American
Speaker 2: Academy of Arts and Sciences, this is how they control
Speaker 2: entire fields of study and disciplines with awards, right, So
Speaker 2: I just wanted to show that. And we'll get into
Speaker 2: Homo Economicus here in a second, and probably Anthony Stafford
Speaker 2: Beer would be the next guy I want to introduce
Speaker 2: everybody to. So I'll see if I can find him here.
Speaker 1: I put us on full screen when you bring something outside,
Speaker 1: I just gotta remember the drop back so I can
Speaker 1: see little thing in the box at the bottom when
Speaker 1: you pull it up.
Speaker 2: O the.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say, so those guys are probably responsible
Speaker 1: for that god awful glorification of corporate art and dead
Speaker 1: ugly things that they consider art world.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so here we go. Stafford Beer, he is second
Speaker 2: not yet, I'm doing it right now, second phase cybernetician.
Speaker 2: So he comes after the Macy conferences, so secon can
Speaker 2: order cybernetics should pop up there now for you. Okay,
Speaker 2: so yes, we're using wiki but there's tons of sources here,
Speaker 2: and everything that's said here I've confirmed in primary source material.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you can tell by their by their narrative
Speaker 1: when they're writing it. What with the with the bullshit
Speaker 1: is too Yes, okay, it's okay to use it as
Speaker 1: a foundation as long as you're smart enough to understand
Speaker 1: how it's feeding spad to you. Right.
Speaker 2: So for those that aren't familiar, ells too.
Speaker 1: So a lot of times they're very they actually, you know,
Speaker 1: will claim more when we're talking about themselves.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, very much so. They'll they'll exaggerate, and so
Speaker 2: you have to be cognizant of that too. You can't
Speaker 2: just take what they say, like yesterday, well not a
Speaker 2: great example, but yesterday, Buddy actually in a in a
Speaker 2: in a live conference on YouTube at the World War
Speaker 2: One Museum. He's he's doing a lecture called Madman in
Speaker 2: the White House, and he's basically putting all the blame
Speaker 2: of World War One and the failure of the League
Speaker 2: of Nations on Woodrow Wilson. He's openly using the term
Speaker 2: new World Order. And it's all a room of intellectuals
Speaker 2: and scholars, you know, we're in the academic realm, and
Speaker 2: he's openly using the term new World Order, which I
Speaker 2: found fascinating. So for those that don't know what cybernetics is.
Speaker 2: This is really the the amalgamation of all of the
Speaker 2: sciences together, even if you didn't think that they were related.
Speaker 2: They started having these interdisciplinary meetings in the forties and fifties.
Speaker 2: This is where you know some of the first invitees.
Speaker 2: There was only five or six to the first meetings,
Speaker 2: and Margaret Mead and her husband, Gregory Bates, and Cia
Speaker 2: Cia were there, and so their first two meetings was
Speaker 2: hypnotism and some other behavioral science. So you could see
Speaker 2: that they're already well into the study of humans. This
Speaker 2: comes out of the social science sociology coming from the
Speaker 2: German historical school. So it's really just the study of
Speaker 2: humans through the gathering of stats and facts and data
Speaker 2: and then feeding it back into society this information that
Speaker 2: they found to then steer society.
Speaker 1: Like market with anthropologists, wasn't she.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but that is a social science, history, economics, those
Speaker 2: are all social sciences, all soft sciences, right.
Speaker 1: So somebody ill intent as an anthropologist reconstructing history to
Speaker 1: make it a little bit more semitic, if you will.
Speaker 2: And you know they're pushing all of this science into legitimacy.
Speaker 2: Prior to this like psychiatry, psychology. They were all you
Speaker 2: know sciences, but nobody really considered them real do do?
Speaker 1: Uh? Does Foster Bailey and Alice Bailey come up in
Speaker 1: any of this because they're the Thesist Trust or Lucifer
Speaker 1: Trust and theosophy.
Speaker 2: Yes, well Bailey is a Fabian I think, right, and
Speaker 2: she goes to occultism. Yeah, yeah, that's what you're talking about. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the un the Trust, right, Yeah, So Macy conferences they
Speaker 2: get together in the forties and fifties and start to
Speaker 2: This is the social science research. This is why all
Speaker 2: the universities pretty much today are research universities, because they're
Speaker 2: just busy research in human beings. And then they take
Speaker 2: that information that they've collected, like I said, and they
Speaker 2: apply it back. So you have applied sciences and research
Speaker 2: social sciences. That's how this works. Okay, So a feedback
Speaker 2: loop is what we see here. Okay, input output. The
Speaker 2: engineer social engineer, they're even using the term here, feeds
Speaker 2: this information back in to redirect society. And so second
Speaker 2: phase or second order cybernetics is considering their own input.
Speaker 2: So you can see here that Wiener, Baitson, and Need
Speaker 2: are in this higher more detached viewpoint on society. So
Speaker 2: they're not just looking at society and feeding back information
Speaker 2: that they're gathering from them, but they're actually gathering the
Speaker 2: information that comes from their own involvement in controlling society.
Speaker 2: So you can see it's a feedback loop inside a
Speaker 2: feedback loop. Yeah, so they're actually they're considering their own
Speaker 2: actions here. They've put themselves into the model. So really,
Speaker 2: when you look at that, when you break away from
Speaker 2: society or whatever you're looking at in a two phase
Speaker 2: sort of thing, you're looking at high level grant strategists.
Speaker 2: Wiener is the founder of cybernetics, the coiner of the
Speaker 2: term and baits and and need married right, both CIA
Speaker 2: working deeply with the CIA.
Speaker 1: Is she in any way related to Anthony Wiener? I
Speaker 1: see the descendant.
Speaker 2: I have not been able to make that connection, but
Speaker 2: I wouldn't be surprised, honestly.
Speaker 1: There's the reason why these families keep popping up. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're rooted. So I'm not sure if he is one
Speaker 1: of the one of those examples, but could be.
Speaker 2: Well, his father was a teacher at Harvard, and his
Speaker 2: father worked with the Inquiry, the founder of Council on
Speaker 2: foreign relations. And actually Norbert was the most magnificent boy
Speaker 2: in the world. He was on the front cover of
Speaker 2: newspapers and he was teaching himself at Harvard at the
Speaker 2: age of sixteen or seventeen, while his father was also
Speaker 2: a professor there of Slavic studies. So guy's a genius,
Speaker 2: right and he was. He was brought in to try
Speaker 2: to develop the surface to air missile so they could
Speaker 2: shoot things down that were flying over. This is how
Speaker 2: they created the feedback loop because when you think about
Speaker 2: the missile traveling to hit a moving object, it had
Speaker 2: to continually get information as to the location because it
Speaker 2: was always changing, and so that continuous barrage on the
Speaker 2: incoming information helped steer the missile and made it successful
Speaker 2: to shoot down moving objects. So it's the exact same
Speaker 2: thing that they said, Okay, we can now apply this
Speaker 2: actually to society, and that's exactly what they do today,
Speaker 2: and that's how they've gotten here. This is you know,
Speaker 2: you can see it in books like cass Sunstein's nudge
Speaker 2: theory or the Fabian's approach to moving society in a slow,
Speaker 2: methodical way rather than force of arms. This is why
Speaker 2: League of Nations in internationalism the UN is created in
Speaker 2: the first place. So there's a key guy here that
Speaker 2: I want to bring attention to, and I'll see if
Speaker 2: I can find him. He's going to be somewhere down
Speaker 2: here in second order cybernetics. He's definitely going to be
Speaker 2: mentioned in. His name is Anthony Stafford, Beer.
Speaker 1: Control lef. You'll be able to find it.
Speaker 2: He's right here now, Okay, he gets he's the one
Speaker 2: that Yeah, so beer, it says beer here. I'm not
Speaker 2: sure it must have introduced him up higher, but he's
Speaker 2: the viable system model creator and management cybernetics is really
Speaker 2: where we want to go because this is now creating
Speaker 2: a corporate model rather than the factory shop model of
Speaker 2: a We've talked about the Principles of Scientific Management published
Speaker 2: nineteen oh nine or nineteen eleven. In nineteen thirteen, and
Speaker 2: this was to perfect the factory worker. And this is
Speaker 2: some of the words that they use the perfectibility of man.
Speaker 2: So we're going to get back to that word. Just
Speaker 2: remember perfect because this is what the Illuminati were first
Speaker 2: called yestibilists, right, yes, So these are the connections and
Speaker 2: language that I want to make here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, in German, it's perfectible list in.
Speaker 2: Right, And so we see commonality in language in the cyberneticians,
Speaker 2: but also the American progressives, the Fabians. They're all talking
Speaker 2: about this mission to perfect human beings. This is something
Speaker 2: that Albert Pike talks about in Morals and Dogma. The
Speaker 2: Freemasons talk about progress and the perfection of man as
Speaker 2: one of their main it is their major pursuit. It's
Speaker 2: their main pursuit, the Free must Masons.
Speaker 1: Right exactly. And looking at that picture of Stafford Beer, Yeah,
Speaker 1: is he actually a British man or is he just
Speaker 1: from the region of Britain, because it doesn't look.
Speaker 2: Like that's life. Yeah, And so we're going to get
Speaker 2: into him and his family here in a second. And
Speaker 2: what they're really trying to make, and what he does
Speaker 2: make is he's making the human being, or making society
Speaker 2: in general, a perpetual motion machine that just continues to
Speaker 2: make money. So you can look at a city like
Speaker 2: the motherboard of a computer, and within those buildings is
Speaker 2: a whole lot of energy being passed back and forth.
Speaker 2: You think about the paperwork being done, all the administration
Speaker 2: that's being done. It creates income.
Speaker 1: And he was pretty young during the cybernetics time thirty
Speaker 1: like I mean, yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's second fase. So he comes along in the
Speaker 2: next generation of guys because they need to. They're moving
Speaker 2: to a corporate model. This is the fascist state, is corporatism.
Speaker 2: So they've got to get out of the manufactory and
Speaker 2: get into this office setting. Much like the Matrix movie
Speaker 2: where we find it mister Anderson for the first time
Speaker 2: in his cubicles. We'll get there. And so he's sitting
Speaker 2: there contemplating on how to make human society a perpetual
Speaker 2: motion machine to make money forever twenty four to seven
Speaker 2: three sixty five for corporate owners. That's what his method
Speaker 2: and his whole scheme was. That's why he's known today.
Speaker 2: So his father worked at Lloyd's Registered Group Limited, which
Speaker 2: apparently isn't the same as Lloyd's of London, but they
Speaker 2: come from the same coffee shop. They come from the
Speaker 2: same time period here Edward Lloyd and his coffee shop.
Speaker 2: So I would say that they're the same thing. But
Speaker 2: what's here to know is that Anthony Stafford Beer's father
Speaker 2: was one of the key guys in the Lloyd's registry,
Speaker 2: and so what is that. But that's he's a key statistician.
Speaker 2: It's the collection of statistics on society. So I haven't
Speaker 2: done much further than that, but I would imagine that
Speaker 2: you're going to find the censuses.
Speaker 1: Statistics.
Speaker 2: So this is where Beer's father is. He's working here
Speaker 2: as a statistician gathering stats on the people of London.
Speaker 1: And seventeen sixty.
Speaker 2: Yeah, seventeen sixty. So it all lines up at the
Speaker 2: same time.
Speaker 1: So oh, it's a charity too, How surprising.
Speaker 2: If? Yeah, non not for profit? I think yes, And
Speaker 2: so you can see that education.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so it's not to be confute evident. It is
Speaker 1: a Lloyd's Register Foundation, a UK chair already dedicated to
Speaker 1: research and education in science and engineering.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so there you go, and totally connected to the
Speaker 2: Lloyd's of London. So I'm going to just share another
Speaker 2: window here if I can get there, see where it is.
Speaker 2: So we're going to get to homo economicists now, because
Speaker 2: this is the building of economic man. We're getting out
Speaker 2: of the manufactory of man. We talk about the changing
Speaker 2: images of man. This is the study that comes out
Speaker 2: of Stanford Research Institute. Stanford University is a research university,
Speaker 2: much like every one of them, and so they're they're
Speaker 2: inspired by Huxley, both Huxley brothers B. F. Skinner, all
Speaker 2: the behavior as scientists with this changing images of man study,
Speaker 2: and so you can see that long before that even
Speaker 2: they're talking about homo economicus and so who is homo economicus?
Speaker 2: But the portrayal of humans as agents. Okay, we're going
Speaker 2: to go back on that word here in a bit.
Speaker 2: But remember agents so are consistently rational and narrowly self interested,
Speaker 2: so compartmentalized, they only know specific information. Really, this is
Speaker 2: the whole method of professionalization. So who pursue their subjectivity
Speaker 2: or and who pursue their subjectively defined ends optimally. It
Speaker 2: is a wordplay on Homo sapiens used in some economic
Speaker 2: theories and pedagogy, so.
Speaker 1: It's used for the first time popped up in there.
Speaker 2: This is who is all doing the interdisciplinary meetings at
Speaker 2: the Macy conferences, all of those kinds of guys. So
Speaker 2: shows your own brand.
Speaker 1: That's that's surprising. So, uh, the wealth of nations and.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so John Stuart Mill makes a comment here on
Speaker 2: that page and states there somewhere that the homoeconomicists or
Speaker 2: the economic man desires to possess wealth, obtains the greatest
Speaker 2: amount of necessities, conveniences and luxuries with the smallest quantity
Speaker 2: of labor. So if that doesn't describe exactly what's going
Speaker 2: on today people with no attention spans that e needs gratification. Right,
Speaker 2: this is where we're seeing the development of all of that.
Speaker 2: And they called it economic man.
Speaker 1: That also brings to mind the idea of the efficiency
Speaker 1: of minimum input maximum output.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is efficiency and that isn't one of the
Speaker 2: main pillars of progressivism. So you've got the scientific experts one,
Speaker 2: you've got preparedness is too, and efficiencies three. Those are
Speaker 2: the three legs that progressivism stands on. So yeah, efficiency
Speaker 2: was all about. This is what the principles of scientific management.
Speaker 2: Frederick Winslow Taylor. This is their method. They perfectibility. Again
Speaker 2: you see there, right, optimum output for the most income. God,
Speaker 2: that's what's your cash value. And so this we feel
Speaker 2: this all the time when we go to work. If
Speaker 2: somebody else is doing a better job than you and
Speaker 2: making the boss more money, all of a sudden, you're compromised.
Speaker 2: You will get hired.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and just think about this, like like in the
Speaker 1: fight club, you are not your job, Like why do
Speaker 1: you have to tell somebody that if it hasn't been
Speaker 1: beaten into our skulls, that our profession, you know, defines
Speaker 1: our self worth. You know, if it was, if it
Speaker 1: wasn't already part of the social construct and thought process,
Speaker 1: we wouldn't have to be told by Tyler Dirdin that
Speaker 1: you are not your job.
Speaker 2: And doesn't that go along with George Bernard Shaw's vision
Speaker 2: of you know, the industrial democracies what he called it,
Speaker 2: and Louis Brandei's read all of his work and imposed
Speaker 2: a lot of the legislation that created an industrial democracy
Speaker 2: ready to accept fascism because Bernard Baruk the Phi Beta
Speaker 2: Capa we mentioned earlier, he's elected chairman of the War
Speaker 2: Industries Board. This is where public and private gets brought together.
Speaker 2: And that is the definition of Mussolini's corporatism.
Speaker 1: You know how they have the six degrees of Kevin Bacon. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you could take Brandeis and and and what do you
Speaker 1: call it, Baroke, and you could create a whole history
Speaker 1: that would be pretty damn full just by using those
Speaker 1: two guys.
Speaker 2: Yep, yep, I agree. They are highly influential. Coming from
Speaker 2: the same fraternity, the oldest fraternity in America, so just
Speaker 2: so people don't think that we don't have solutions. I
Speaker 2: want to go back to that word agent and how
Speaker 2: they want us to all be utilitarian and be agents. Okay,
Speaker 2: So the Trivium is a great representation this book that
Speaker 2: I have up here right now, Liberal Arts of Logic, grammar,
Speaker 2: and rhetoric. This is a great example of the education
Speaker 2: that they moved from our system to keep us dumb down.
Speaker 2: Charlotte Lizzerbeet, John Taylor Gatto go into this work the
Speaker 2: deliberate dumbing down of America because can you out think
Speaker 2: us at.
Speaker 1: Zoom a little bit? Like, can you stretch it a
Speaker 1: little bit? I think a zoom in. Yeah, this this
Speaker 1: type is a little bit smaller, So yes it is. Yeah.
Speaker 2: So what there? This is the first couple pages of
Speaker 2: the Trivia, and it's just talking and it's really in
Speaker 2: an introductory form talking about grammar, logic, rhetoric. You know,
Speaker 2: all of these rich people go to grammar schools. This
Speaker 2: is why they go to Groton. You know, Lipmann went
Speaker 2: to sax School for boys. This is what they're learning
Speaker 2: how to properly think and talk and communicate. And then
Speaker 2: they take that information. They took it right out of
Speaker 2: our school. So no shit, we're having difficulties trying to
Speaker 2: communicate with each other right now because we don't have
Speaker 2: the skills. And so I went and took this book
Speaker 2: ten years ago and started them putting it into my
Speaker 2: body and into my brain and into my lifestyle, and uh,
Speaker 2: it's it's really helping in decision making right, all kinds
Speaker 2: of things across the board. It's really one of the
Speaker 2: things that I identify as a major causal factor to
Speaker 2: our life being where it is today. What's weird brother
Speaker 2: to farming and all of these things, trivium and our
Speaker 2: ability to ask the who what, why we're winning and
Speaker 2: know that we have patients and if there's time, use it.
Speaker 2: This is how I developed into a farmer.
Speaker 1: You know. It's funny because like I was a liberal
Speaker 1: arts you know, in community college, and I did like
Speaker 1: an emphasis on history and English.
Speaker 2: Nice.
Speaker 1: But what's what you're saying is how they pulled it
Speaker 1: out of the education will in our formative years where
Speaker 1: things are the most impressionble in our minds, that's when
Speaker 1: they took it out. So it doesn't have the same
Speaker 1: impact even if you get to it later.
Speaker 2: And I've got to just step out for one minute
Speaker 2: if you repound.
Speaker 1: Of course, what's it? Full screen and to not to
Speaker 1: never never Land. Hello, So the layout, bam, there we go.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, I wonder if I can just go like that.
Speaker 1: I can, and I did check that out well, learning
Speaker 1: new things about this new navigation streamer puts in new
Speaker 1: stuff every once in a while, and sometimes it's good.
Speaker 2: Oh wow.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I think at oh ten thirty at the
Speaker 1: very latest, we have to wrap it up today because
Speaker 1: I have to go get a new tire. Take the
Speaker 1: one that's the drive tire, put that as a spare.
Speaker 1: But then on there we're going to San Diego, my
Speaker 1: daughter and I dropping off some hot sauce, and then
Speaker 1: for an order that just paid me as we were
Speaker 1: on the phone here, and again spending whatever the remainder
Speaker 1: of that day is at Sea World, and then Friday
Speaker 1: going back to Sea World. We have this season past
Speaker 1: we haven't used more than twice and it's going to
Speaker 1: expire soon, so I can take her out there. Plus,
Speaker 1: you know, with the potential end of the world happening
Speaker 1: and my feeling that we were all going to be
Speaker 1: summarily executed any minute now, any day now, given the
Speaker 1: political environment, atmosphere at present, and what they're doing all around.
Speaker 1: Did you hear about Wyoming. They're burning Wyoming down. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's beneath the Billings Montane. They're burning the whole fucking
Speaker 1: thing though they're building it down. Are you back back?
Speaker 2: So did you read any of that out?
Speaker 1: I did not. I was scared doing something else.
Speaker 2: Okay, that's cool.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you were talking about education. How they they took
Speaker 2: that information out of our most formative years. That is
Speaker 2: exactly what they did. This is really the education you're
Speaker 2: supposed to learn right away. Grammar, logic, rhetoric. It's how
Speaker 2: to put symbols like letters into words, into sentences, into paragraphs,
Speaker 2: into a composition that makes sense. Okay, So this is
Speaker 2: what drives all of our literary work.
Speaker 1: Anything has to do with critical things and being able
Speaker 1: to see. Once you understand the year, it's like it's
Speaker 1: like wisdom has been removed.
Speaker 2: Yep. And Charlotte Isserbeat's dad was Phi beta Kappa, or
Speaker 2: he was skull and bones.
Speaker 1: Actually they replaced wisdom with empirical knowledge, memorization of facts
Speaker 1: because we told you they're facts, not because they technically
Speaker 1: are facts. But I told you they are.
Speaker 2: Yep, and they took that information that liberated everybody across
Speaker 2: the board in our common school and put it the
Speaker 2: highest echelons of the highest levels of academic, university intellectual world.
Speaker 2: So a Master of Arts degree coming from Harvard is
Speaker 2: the only one that's getting that kind of information.
Speaker 1: The sarcastic nickname of my of my college that I
Speaker 1: went to was called Harvard on the Hudson. I think
Speaker 1: they may have become a four year school since then,
Speaker 1: but they used to just be a two.
Speaker 2: Year Harvard on the Hudson grow Upper State New.
Speaker 1: York, Hudson Valley Community College.
Speaker 2: You know what's interesting is that all of these guys,
Speaker 2: that all of these social engineers, they studied at community colleges,
Speaker 2: and what did they study but this they had to
Speaker 2: have at least a Bachelor of Liberal Arts. Otherwise they
Speaker 2: wouldn't be accepted at the German Historical School because they
Speaker 2: would learn y yeah, and then they would go over
Speaker 2: to learn the social sciences. In America, this is, you know,
Speaker 2: how they overthrew us. So today, as in centuries past,
Speaker 2: a mastery of the Liberal arts is widely recognized as
Speaker 2: the best preparation for work where in professional schools. So
Speaker 2: we're getting into the the origins of professionalism, something that
Speaker 2: nobody really talks about, right, But this is who we're
Speaker 2: guided by.
Speaker 1: But if you give your somebody a fancy title, they
Speaker 1: feel all so much more sophisticated and superior, even while
Speaker 1: you're enslaving the shit out of them. Hey, you know,
Speaker 1: flatter the ship out of them and they'll continue to
Speaker 1: be here.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is their whole method. This is why academy
Speaker 2: awards exist. The Nobel Prize got given out this morning,
Speaker 2: and the Pulitzer Prizes. This is what it all is.
Speaker 2: It's just all bullshit. So such as those of medicine, law, engineering,
Speaker 2: or theology. So we see that this is why kids
Speaker 2: go to grammar school if they're rich, so that they
Speaker 2: have a Bachelor of Arts or at least a strong
Speaker 2: background in being able to speak and communicate, especially in
Speaker 2: front of groups of people. So that's instilling a major
Speaker 2: level of confidence into youa if you think about how
Speaker 2: much confidence you have to have to go up in
Speaker 2: front of a room and confidently speak about something. So
Speaker 2: the seven liberal arts that start grammar logic rhetoric differ
Speaker 2: essentially from the many utilitarian arts Okay, there's that word utility,
Speaker 2: such as carpentry, masonry, plumbing, salesmanship, printing, editing, banking law.
Speaker 2: And so I'm a red seal carpenter. I got nothing
Speaker 2: against being a utilitarian. This is really these are the
Speaker 2: people to keep our society running. But if you wanted
Speaker 2: to not just have a job just overbroke, and you
Speaker 2: wanted to actually make a living for yourself, this is
Speaker 2: the difference between a utilitarian art and the liberal arts.
Speaker 2: This is you're liberating yourself from enslavery of the mind
Speaker 2: first and foremost, so that your body can fall. You
Speaker 2: can see they list the seven fine arts, and then
Speaker 2: so it says for both the utilitarian arts and the
Speaker 2: fine arts are transitive activities, whereas the essential characteristic of
Speaker 2: the liberal arts is that they are imminent and intransitive activities,
Speaker 2: meaning that they are in you forever. So a carpenter
Speaker 2: can build you something out of wood and pass on
Speaker 2: that to somebody else and make money from it. And
Speaker 2: this is where we get to the word agent, in
Speaker 2: that a liberal artist is his own agent. He can
Speaker 2: walk the earth with no tools and make a living
Speaker 2: for himself, whereas a car or somebody else has to
Speaker 2: create something, and the energy goes through the agent into
Speaker 2: the object that you're selling. Okay, now you're behooving to
Speaker 2: sell and produce. There's a huge difference in how you're
Speaker 2: going to live your life there, and so all we're
Speaker 2: doing is trying to steer people towards the liberal arts.
Speaker 2: Look at this book, specifically the trivium, try to grasp
Speaker 2: there's a this is deep, okay, and it's taken me.
Speaker 2: I've read this book through three times, four times, and
Speaker 2: it's a reference book for me. So if you do
Speaker 2: adventure into here, if it gets too confluted and too
Speaker 2: difficult to understand, it's okay, because this is what everybody
Speaker 2: goes through. It's just you know this. We're entering into
Speaker 2: a world where you need to read paragraphs a second
Speaker 2: or third or fourth time. So it's a changing of
Speaker 2: how you approach a book. I know you're familiar with
Speaker 2: this as a researcher. This is how you do it,
Speaker 2: so don't be intimidated by how confusing or complicated it
Speaker 2: may seem at the beginning. I think they do a
Speaker 2: good job of introducing the reader to what liberal arts
Speaker 2: are exactly, and so that's all I wanted to show
Speaker 2: there was that the agency of yourself.
Speaker 1: Right, yeah, and coming from somebody who actually make who
Speaker 1: does actually make products. And if you're not doing it
Speaker 1: for somebody else, if you're doing it for yourself, that
Speaker 1: is itself. And I know I'm using the word in
Speaker 1: a different way liberating, right because you are, and like
Speaker 1: you said, you're transferring that energy if you actually care
Speaker 1: about what you're doing and not just trying to make
Speaker 1: some piece of junk to sell it. When your heart
Speaker 1: and soul go into something and you take pride in it,
Speaker 1: that's that's a whole different type of existence.
Speaker 2: And so that would yes, and that would be closer
Speaker 2: to the fine arts in many ways, because we make
Speaker 2: our own products too, and the role of the fine
Speaker 2: artist is to make something beautiful that lasts forever. This
Speaker 2: is what the trivium says, right, this is your mindset
Speaker 2: when you go to create something as a utilitarian or
Speaker 2: a fine artist, make it something that's beautiful and it lasts.
Speaker 2: And today we have a even just cycle of everything
Speaker 2: that's less than seven years. We don't have I mean
Speaker 2: we here and dryers used to be handed down through
Speaker 2: the families and shit, but that doesn't happen though.
Speaker 1: I mean, just look at how architecture materials have changed
Speaker 1: since the ancient times. Right, we still see pyramids because
Speaker 1: they're made on us stone. We still see all these
Speaker 1: other structures they've made us stone. Now everything's again, what
Speaker 1: is it? What do you call it? Drywall? Fucking chalk?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? Like a little bit of
Speaker 1: water damage and it's all bye bye.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're almost back to the Gilded Age, right, we're
Speaker 2: surface society.
Speaker 1: You can just wipe it away and no we would
Speaker 1: ever know it happened.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, so I'm gonna jump over a little bit.
Speaker 2: We've been creating this current of thought about how they
Speaker 2: want to make the human perfect, and the Skull and
Speaker 2: Bones are behind this, the Illuminati perfectibilists.
Speaker 1: Oh sorry, I looked away for a second.
Speaker 2: So here's the wiki page on Scull and Bones.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of fraterninal orders that are actually uh
Speaker 1: intertwined between the Masons, and Skull and Bones actually has
Speaker 1: subsidiaries in different yes, in different colleges as well.
Speaker 2: It's all connected, uh and and Skull and Bones actually
Speaker 2: comes out of Phi Beta Kappa. Because there was an
Speaker 2: argument as to who got accepted as Phi Beta Kappa. So, uh,
Speaker 2: what's his name? Will Fawn's Tafft and the other guy
Speaker 2: they got together and created the Skull and Bones.
Speaker 1: Is that what you're talking about?
Speaker 2: Well, Daniel Kuait Gilman's.
Speaker 1: There because he was he was the guy with the
Speaker 1: rust and trust.
Speaker 2: Russell Russell's the other guy, William Huntington and Russell this
Speaker 2: guy right here that we're staring at. Okay, so that's
Speaker 2: these guys. This is what happened, and actually it's I
Speaker 2: think it states it right there. Yeah, over that season's
Speaker 2: five Beta Kappa Awards, So there's a source there you
Speaker 2: can chase. So I wanted to show that that they
Speaker 2: are actually connected Phi Beta Kappa Skull and Bones, because
Speaker 2: ultimately all of them are. No matter what secret society
Speaker 2: you are part of, they're all connected in the underground.
Speaker 2: They're gonna be more accepting of you if you were
Speaker 2: a secret society member of Dartmouth. Then if you weren't
Speaker 2: and you were a community college guy, right, they're going
Speaker 2: to there's a fraternity even if you aren't necessarily Fellows Bones. Okay,
Speaker 2: So now to this other interesting aspect to do with
Speaker 2: the Skull and Bones, because I was just reading this
Speaker 2: yesterday about the origins of the Skull and Bones and
Speaker 2: why it was created. So give me one second, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna get the right. Why not, we'll go back to
Speaker 2: our friend here, Huntington and Russell, because we see that
Speaker 2: the motivations for their existence coincides with the American progressives,
Speaker 2: the Fabian society, corporations, imperialism, colonialism. Okay, so there's a
Speaker 2: second wiki page from Skull and Bones. But I found
Speaker 2: this very interesting here and then it.
Speaker 1: States that did I just see Brotherhood of Snake up there?
Speaker 2: Quite possible and as another alternative name.
Speaker 1: Book of Snake, Okay, Book and Snake.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So there again they talk about the Phi Beta Kappa,
Speaker 2: Honor and.
Speaker 1: Scroll and Key, so yeah, Scroll and Key, right.
Speaker 2: College of William and Mary, the Iron Arrow Honor Society.
Speaker 2: These are so we can't even explore, but you can
Speaker 2: put them into a search engine. So this is what
Speaker 2: I found really amazing, as these next two paragraphs is
Speaker 2: William Huntington Russell's the co founder of Skull and Bones
Speaker 2: with Alphonso Taft, who's the father of William Howard. Taft
Speaker 2: studied in Germany m from eighteen thirty one to eighteen
Speaker 2: thirty two. I wonder if that was Leipzig, right, quite possibly,
Speaker 2: So it was a land of new ideas. This is
Speaker 2: the whole thing that was with German and still to
Speaker 2: this day, this is why people buy BMW's and stuff
Speaker 2: because of this German sort of prestige exhibit.
Speaker 1: Really good too, though, Vosh, Yeah, yeah, totally.
Speaker 2: Well, I would agree that all of that. I would
Speaker 2: agree with that. So the scientific method was applied to
Speaker 2: all studies of human behavior. Now, yeah, but what happened
Speaker 2: was the social sciences came in and this could be
Speaker 2: the uh usurping that we talk about, where it was
Speaker 2: the scientific method was actually taken over and now we're
Speaker 2: you know, we were born, you and I into a
Speaker 2: world of scientism, not scientific method. And this is maybe
Speaker 2: what happened is that social science has took place, and
Speaker 2: that's that's what we see in history.
Speaker 1: So we should take a moment to pause on that
Speaker 1: idea because of what you said, because it's you know,
Speaker 1: when it comes to competition, that's what creates quality of craftsmanship.
Speaker 1: When there's no longer Yeah, and because let's say something
Speaker 1: like Blackrock actually essentially owns everything, it's not real competition anymore.
Speaker 1: It's the showing of competition. So therefore the level of
Speaker 1: quality where else you're gonna go, it deteriorates. And the
Speaker 1: automotive industry is one of those places where you can
Speaker 1: see that, really.
Speaker 2: Will yeah, and last week we showed what standard oil
Speaker 2: is today. No, yeah, everything right, standard oil, Son, Chevron,
Speaker 2: so O, BP and shell. But nobody knows that unless
Speaker 2: you go and look. So here's the interesting part for me. Okay,
Speaker 2: Prussia blamed itself for the defeat of its armed forces
Speaker 2: against Napoleon. Now we know that this is the origins
Speaker 2: of our k through twelve education. This is how it
Speaker 2: happened through Johann got Leibfishta, He's the founder of Western education.
Speaker 2: You go back to the Prussian defeat at the hands
Speaker 2: of Napoleon as the reason. This is conspiracy theory, it's actual, documented,
Speaker 2: historical fact. Edward Everett, Horace Mann, Granville Stanley Hall, these
Speaker 2: American founders of our education system did exactly what William
Speaker 2: Huntington Russell did. He studied in Germany to then bring
Speaker 2: this system over and adopt it. So against Napoleon in
Speaker 2: eighteen oh six. This is the addresses of the German nation.
Speaker 2: It gets to this, so, even though its soldiers were
Speaker 2: considered the best in the world, they lost to Napoleon. Thus,
Speaker 2: in eighteen seventeen, German universities created a new type of
Speaker 2: education system based on the principles still applied today, established
Speaker 2: by Jean Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. Johann got Leeb
Speaker 2: Fishta is named here. In his addresses to the German
Speaker 2: Nation or German people, declared that children should now take
Speaker 2: the reins of the state. His chair at the university
Speaker 2: was taken over by who Hegel, King of the dialectics, okay,
Speaker 2: and who would teach there until his death in nineteen
Speaker 2: or eighteen thirty one.
Speaker 1: So I see the negatives in this, you know, I
Speaker 1: see good people with like law. But I mean then
Speaker 1: also you see agle coming in and reafter that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I haven't fully threshed all of this out.
Speaker 2: This same with John Stuart Mill. You got John Locke,
Speaker 2: Jean Jacques Rousseau. This is my weak point, these kinds
Speaker 2: of guys. So I'm just reading it.
Speaker 1: They believe that children of the future teach them well, right,
Speaker 1: And so I've.
Speaker 2: Been sharing on Facebook direct quotes out of there show
Speaker 2: and the page from the addresses to the German people,
Speaker 2: in which he says that the free will of the
Speaker 2: student must be removed in the soil before the plant
Speaker 2: even spread out.
Speaker 1: See that one more time, please.
Speaker 2: Well, Johann gottleetfish and the addresses to the German nation.
Speaker 2: I can bring it up to He stated that the
Speaker 2: main goal of this new education was to remove the
Speaker 2: free will of the student in the soil before it sprout.
Speaker 1: It that sounds exactly like the Jesuits bring me a
Speaker 1: child before the age of seven. I was shugging the man.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, And you see that through all of this,
Speaker 2: through this history of the Prussian education syte and the.
Speaker 1: Most impressionable they will, they will isolate you and they
Speaker 1: will develop within you whatever it is they want to
Speaker 1: impress upon you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, changing image of the man talking about that you
Speaker 2: need to be initially brainwashed as a child, and then
Speaker 2: it's consistent reinforcement propaganda as you're an adult. You see. Uh,
Speaker 2: you know the rise of professional sports? Is it locked
Speaker 2: step with this rise of professionalism? And where does American
Speaker 2: football come from? Skull and bones? And you know, look
Speaker 2: it up, people, it's a skull and bonesman. It creates
Speaker 2: American football.
Speaker 1: That's a great picture there too, where they have the
Speaker 1: actual crossbundes are down on the table.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you can see that similar picture with all
Speaker 2: the classes. There's the famous one with Bush.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, yeah, No, there's one with where that show
Speaker 1: is a McCain and carry in it too.
Speaker 2: Oh really, I don't know if I've seen that. So
Speaker 2: that's interesting that they're claiming that it's because of their
Speaker 2: loss to Napoleon. So it's the exact same thing as
Speaker 2: our K through twelve education. So you can see that
Speaker 2: they're actually because psychology, all the social sciences come from Prussia,
Speaker 2: philosophy comes from Prussia. A large part of our Western
Speaker 2: culture got overthrown all at the same time. And you
Speaker 2: can see that they're like, well, we need to bring
Speaker 2: our secret societies over there too. And what's the first
Speaker 2: thing that they do but set the secret societies through
Speaker 2: the universities, because that's how they're going to create this
Speaker 2: society governed by the scientific technical expert society.
Speaker 1: Did you already read this part versus? But Germany had
Speaker 1: yet another specialty, the student secret societies.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is where I'm getting to. This is what
Speaker 2: I'm saying is that they had to have these. And
Speaker 2: you see one of the first things that Walter Lipmann
Speaker 2: does at Harvard is he starts the Intercollegiate Socialist Society.
Speaker 2: What does Brandeis do but starts the Zionist secret societies
Speaker 2: of Parashemet and the Manora at Harvard.
Speaker 1: You know, so that was introduction. So we're saying like
Speaker 1: even those sixteen hundreds, is when Harvard was founded, there
Speaker 1: were no fraternal orders, There was no fraternities and sorority
Speaker 1: until later in history.
Speaker 2: Well, no, I would say that there's secret societies creating Harvard,
Speaker 2: William and Mary and Yale, Columbia, all of those.
Speaker 1: Well, I know the secre societies, but I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the fraternities themselves in colleges. Is that later development because
Speaker 1: that I guess that would make sense, but uh, maybe
Speaker 1: unders because they're saying that, you know, Skull and Bones
Speaker 1: right around that time and then would make sense.
Speaker 2: But hey, uh, the Illuminati, Scoltars or the Illuminati, Phi
Speaker 2: Beta Kappa and America are all founded in seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 1: It all goes to show that the fraternal orders, like
Speaker 1: we're talking about with Freemasons and the fraternal the fraternities
Speaker 1: and the sororities are uh what you called it like
Speaker 1: an outcropping of the same thing, and it's not just
Speaker 1: happened to be the same type of language. So this hand,
Speaker 1: the hand gestures, the hand symbols, all that stuff THO
Speaker 1: you were talking about with even with gang symbols. But
Speaker 1: this is all connected and you're being you're being selected
Speaker 1: and groomed in these places for these fraternities that it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter how the dinet looks. Someone's watching you, and
Speaker 1: if you are of the salt that they're looking for,
Speaker 1: you will be tapped for other societies and they have
Speaker 1: the same philosophy. You always, no matter what throughout your
Speaker 1: entire life, you if you see one of your brothers,
Speaker 1: whether it's for a collegiate fraternity or you're in you know,
Speaker 1: the Freemasons, you always help that person out no matter what.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if they're wrong, if you're on it,
Speaker 1: if you're a jury, you you you know, you vote
Speaker 1: up in their favor.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, So.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so you're the judge.
Speaker 2: We wanted to talk about beer. I think we've done that.
Speaker 2: I do want to bring up one thing here though,
Speaker 2: and I don't think we have it on a tab.
Speaker 2: So I'm just gonna bring up business communication. You think
Speaker 2: about the word business communication starts with the same as communism.
Speaker 2: C O M m U N. This started to bend
Speaker 2: my mind a little bit because this is the creation
Speaker 2: of this business model, the corporate model. If I can
Speaker 2: find it here, like you say, you have to put
Speaker 2: it in exactly or it may not come up. But
Speaker 2: it is in one of his series. So business communication,
Speaker 2: this is really the image that comes up if I
Speaker 2: can find it. Is an image of the matrix and
Speaker 2: you know, people sitting in an office around a conference
Speaker 2: table communicating, brainstorming. This is sort of the idea behind it.
Speaker 2: But I can't find it, So I would encourage everybody
Speaker 2: to go there look it into business management. I think
Speaker 2: that beer creates and that leads you into business communication.
Speaker 2: We've talked about homo economicus as agents of utility to
Speaker 2: maximize their cash value to corporations. This is the establishment
Speaker 2: of the necessary very individual for fascism and it still
Speaker 2: exists today. Okay, so the perfectibility of man. We talked
Speaker 2: about the perfectibilists.
Speaker 1: It screws it up because it's all about crafting beer.
Speaker 2: When you look it up like that, Anthony Stafford Beer, Yeah,
Speaker 2: bring him up, and then there's a link to it,
Speaker 2: and I think I can do that.
Speaker 1: Actually, here bear Anthony Stafford. This just is his name.
Speaker 1: Beer's viable system model is that what you're looking at.
Speaker 2: Viable systems model is what he's famous for. We can
Speaker 2: probably get there from there.
Speaker 1: All right, let's see if there's anything else Mark Anthony
Speaker 1: Brewing nostomers, and.
Speaker 2: Then we're going to get into Albert Pike and the
Speaker 2: morals of dogma, because it's all the same. We're talking
Speaker 2: about progress using scientific method to to perfect the human being.
Speaker 2: Harvard sixteen thirty six, William and Mary sixteen ninety three,
Speaker 2: Yale seventeen oh one, Columbia seventeen fifty four, then America
Speaker 2: seventeen seventy six, and then Union College seventeen ninety five.
Speaker 2: And William and Mary original plans actually date back to
Speaker 2: before the creation of Harvard, to sixteen nineteen, So William
Speaker 2: and Mary Phi Beta kapp are really the first academic
Speaker 2: institution in America. So this wanting to govern society by
Speaker 2: the opinion of the scientific expert. We see that in headlines.
Speaker 2: This goes back to the seventeen hundreds, late seventeen early
Speaker 2: eighteen hundreds with what the Prussian Reformation. This is where
Speaker 2: it all comes out.
Speaker 1: So this is interesting. They're actually mentioning the cybernetics here,
Speaker 1: so this might be a good one basis of variety.
Speaker 2: It won't lead us to business communication though, So see
Speaker 2: you have a let me see if I can conjunction
Speaker 2: and purposes of organizations, environment management operations.
Speaker 1: Ashby's love requisite, right.
Speaker 2: He Ashby, And so he's a he's a key guy
Speaker 2: with the Macy conferences. I got some of his books
Speaker 2: here that are incredible.
Speaker 1: Principal's organization right here. And it's not clickable though, so
Speaker 1: you're talking about read that right.
Speaker 2: Let me just bring up Beer.
Speaker 1: This is on a site called business Balls, just saying.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and there's video of Stafford Beer. He's you know,
Speaker 2: he only died in two thousand and two. Uh So
Speaker 2: let's see what we can do here.
Speaker 1: There's some controls.
Speaker 2: Try to share this page here if you don't mind.
Speaker 1: This might actually be worth Yeah, this might actually be
Speaker 1: worth looking at later on at some point for those
Speaker 1: of you out there. There's some interesting stuff in there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, all of this to make a point that's pretty minor,
Speaker 2: but it's important visuals for us to understand. So management science, management, cybernetics,
Speaker 2: organizational design, systems theory, game theory, public administration. So we
Speaker 2: think about this word administration because the administrative man comes
Speaker 2: after the economic man because he needs somebody to do
Speaker 2: the paperwork. Second order cybernetics, Stafford Beer. So let me
Speaker 2: just see if I can bring this Beer up now,
Speaker 2: and we'll get into him a little bit before we
Speaker 2: get into morals and Dogma Albert Pike.
Speaker 1: And if you're in if you're in Rumbull, if you're
Speaker 1: in a FTJ. I just dropped the link that I
Speaker 1: was looking at because there're some interesting things in there
Speaker 1: too to look at.
Speaker 2: So you got Anthony Stafford Beer.
Speaker 1: There I do.
Speaker 2: Okay, So here's management cybernetics. This is where we were earlier,
Speaker 2: and so you can see he's he's doing designs based
Speaker 2: off of the feedback loop that was created a generation
Speaker 2: prior by Norbert Wiener, and now he's starting to apply
Speaker 2: that feedback loop into the corporate model and he calls
Speaker 2: it the viable systems model. YEP. Concerned with the application
Speaker 2: of cybernetics to management and organizations. Management cybernetics was first
Speaker 2: introduced by Stafford Beer in the late nineteen fifties. So
Speaker 2: this is right in line with the Macy Conferences forty
Speaker 2: eight I think was the first meeting and then throughout
Speaker 2: the fifties and introduces the various mechanisms of self regulation
Speaker 2: applied by in two organizational settings. So they want to
Speaker 2: have a selfie regulating atmosphere where they don't actually have
Speaker 2: to police or babysit. The workers know what they're supposed
Speaker 2: to be doing and they efficiently go about their business
Speaker 2: as optimally as they can.
Speaker 1: And for the people who aren't aware, like cybernetics was
Speaker 1: the think tanking of this, and then I think I
Speaker 1: use it as a very as think tank for what
Speaker 1: would then become the application in MK ultra projects.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's the origins of the mk ultra. They have
Speaker 2: Margaret Need there, somebody you would never really associate with,
Speaker 2: you know, social engineering, but that is in fact exactly
Speaker 2: what she is as an anthropologist. She controls you know,
Speaker 2: that aspect of human study. And you can see there's
Speaker 2: a link to the Macy Conferences here, Peter.
Speaker 1: There's a rise of there's a rise of the expert.
Speaker 2: What do you call it?
Speaker 1: Attribute to that too, because it's it's the study of
Speaker 1: the human that they want you to know about.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is all to create a society governed by
Speaker 2: the scientific technical expert Lippmann called them entering wedges, and
Speaker 2: they were going to be put into intelligence bureaus, which
Speaker 2: is really the administrative state. And then, as we've shown,
Speaker 2: Brandeis actually makes it all happen.
Speaker 1: It's not even about human nature. It's about the nature
Speaker 1: of human that they want to create it.
Speaker 2: Right, so you can see Gregory Bates and comes up
Speaker 2: here too, management science. We'll see if I can end
Speaker 2: up where I wanted to. It may not happen, but
Speaker 2: there was there was a picture.
Speaker 1: When you throw in the what is it business organization
Speaker 1: and beer into Mickey does Apapa Faithing or now.
Speaker 2: Put beer into what.
Speaker 1: Anthony beer and you were looking for business management? Right?
Speaker 2: Is that the word of yeah, yeah, yeah, yep, that's
Speaker 2: really what he helps establish. And okay, so look it
Speaker 2: goes back to Frederick Winslow Taylor and the principles of
Speaker 2: scientific management. So this is where we're just showing that
Speaker 2: this is coming right out of there. And guess what,
Speaker 2: Even before the influence of these men, there was Louis Brandeis,
Speaker 2: who became known as the People's Lawyer. In nineteen ten.
Speaker 2: Brandeis was the creator of a new business approach, which
Speaker 2: he coined as scientific management. We've confirmed this, we don't
Speaker 2: need to anymore. That he is the coiner of the term.
Speaker 2: He's the controller of the whole Taylor Society, the groups
Speaker 2: of men that create the slide rule, the Gant chart,
Speaker 2: all these things that we still see today. To make
Speaker 2: the human at work the most efficient, it all comes
Speaker 2: from scientific management.
Speaker 1: There you go.
Speaker 2: They're saying it right there.
Speaker 1: That definitely Frederick Winslow Taylor would be tairorism, right, that's
Speaker 1: the guy. Yes, yeah, yes, And this is the most
Speaker 1: influential ism.
Speaker 2: Yeah, one of the most influential isms of the twentieth century.
Speaker 2: William Peter Jennings said on ABC News. So the business
Speaker 2: use of operations research is what he calls the field
Speaker 2: of management science. And this is really what drives it
Speaker 2: as communication. So they understand that to have an efficient
Speaker 2: corporate model, the product isn't necessarily physical anymore, it's intellectual property,
Speaker 2: and so communication becomes huge. Okay, And so I don't
Speaker 2: know where I'm going to find that.
Speaker 1: It would be if you're trying to, oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: change people's ways of thought, you would have to write
Speaker 1: in a certain ways. So now media and things like
Speaker 1: that would be even more important. Man, media became more
Speaker 1: what do you call it, easy to spread technology too.
Speaker 2: And you can see here they use mathematical modeling and statistics,
Speaker 2: numerical algorithms. Do that stuff sound familiar today? Yes, this
Speaker 2: is what they're using in these event tool ones. The
Speaker 2: projection of COVID.
Speaker 1: The misuse of that term is pretty widespread. Yeah, everything's
Speaker 1: algorithms to people.
Speaker 2: To get into. You know, this is how climate change
Speaker 2: and all these false narratives get created, is through mathematical
Speaker 2: modeling and the use or the abuse of statistics and facts.
Speaker 1: As long as it comes from a source that is
Speaker 1: looking official and authoritative, they can tell you any vs
Speaker 1: and people will buy it. Yeah, CGI models included.
Speaker 2: So onto Albert Pike, and I just want to show that,
Speaker 2: you know, this same pursuit of perfection and making the
Speaker 2: human being better is also paralleling with the ideas of
Speaker 2: Albert Pike. You know, the real popularizer of Freemasonry here
Speaker 2: in the West, it's you know the Scottish right, the
Speaker 2: rise of the Scottish Right. Freemasonry is really, you know,
Speaker 2: attributed to Albert Pike. And so what does it say
Speaker 2: on the first page? Lodge of perfection in Yeah, do
Speaker 2: you see it?
Speaker 1: No, I don't think up in the bottom.
Speaker 2: Okay, hang on one sack.
Speaker 1: So when you do that, I'm gonna uh just drop
Speaker 1: my screen.
Speaker 2: Got it.
Speaker 1: My daughter's making talking over here. Just go to see
Speaker 1: what she's up to.
Speaker 2: We're two hours in. I got just a little bit more.
Speaker 1: So, oh, I have one.
Speaker 2: So can you see morals and dogma Lodge of perfection? Yes, okay,
Speaker 2: so you can see that when you go to read
Speaker 2: this book, they use progress a lot, of course, and
Speaker 2: so we point to progress, right this hamster wheel, this
Speaker 2: man made construct of progress that puts us all Monday
Speaker 2: to Friday, eight hours a day, weekends off. He talks
Speaker 2: about the same kinds of things. He's talking about this
Speaker 2: in the same sort of direction he wants to steer society.
Speaker 2: You can see there's forty three references to the word
Speaker 2: progressing here. And I've read the first twenty five pages
Speaker 2: of this and it's it's like listening to an American
Speaker 2: progressive or a Fabian and their pursuit of perfection of
Speaker 2: man to be the answer to a great society of
Speaker 2: the future. Perfect.
Speaker 1: Right, it's humans, secular humanism, yeah, through very clearly. But
Speaker 1: there's also a lot of you know, at least it's
Speaker 1: the mastery of language or whatever you want to call it.
Speaker 1: But there's a lot of real points that are made
Speaker 1: throughout this because I you know, like I said, audio
Speaker 1: book wise, I listened to about probably eighty percent of it,
Speaker 1: and there's a lot in there. I mean, itolas on
Speaker 1: and on and on and on and on in the detail.
Speaker 1: But it's also very creepy knowing the intents involved in
Speaker 1: it's it's expressed quite a few times, and it's always
Speaker 1: about the initiate knowing you know, x amount, and then
Speaker 1: the others you know, and even the initiates don't know.
Speaker 1: It's sell little lad of compartmentalization.
Speaker 2: Right. Yeah. So Albert Pike is here and it's wiki
Speaker 2: page and there he is. There's an Albert Pike Highway
Speaker 2: was built. I don't know if it's still called that today,
Speaker 2: but you can see that he went to Harvard.
Speaker 1: Remember, they saved this statue from being a.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, And this is the one that actually trump
Speaker 2: stood up for and and what is Trump but a
Speaker 2: Scottish Rite freemason for sure, his golf courses in Scotland,
Speaker 2: all of these things. So he Trump famously came out
Speaker 2: and defended the statue of Albert Pike specifically during his presidency.
Speaker 2: So we've been able to confirm that Albert Pike went
Speaker 2: to Harvard, so that's not you know, subjectivity, it's not
Speaker 2: a conjecture. He went there and he received i think
Speaker 2: an honorary Bachelor of Arts, or he had received it
Speaker 2: prior to his time at Harvard. So you can see
Speaker 2: even Albert Pike had to be instilled with grammar, logic, rhetoric,
Speaker 2: and when you look into freemasonry, there's a total connection
Speaker 2: there with and I'm going to write this down to
Speaker 2: remind myself to show you guys this picture of freemasonry
Speaker 2: steps with the trivium named for each step, or the
Speaker 2: Liberal arts, and then how that associates to architecture. I'll
Speaker 2: see if I can get that up at the end
Speaker 2: of the show, because it kind of shows that all
Speaker 2: of this is connected and it it you know, spills
Speaker 2: into Kabbala too. The Kabbala tree of life coincides with
Speaker 2: grammar logic rhetoric and the liberal arts. It's understanding knowledge
Speaker 2: wisdom as opposed to grammar logic rhetoric, but they speak
Speaker 2: the same way. This is the secret information that drives kabbala,
Speaker 2: that drives the academic liberal arts world, that drives freemasonry.
Speaker 2: And this is why I point to it as the answer,
Speaker 2: because this is how they are getting it over on us.
Speaker 2: They are conscious and we are subconscious of a few
Speaker 2: things or unconscious, And so to invigorate our mind and
Speaker 2: our body with the trivium grab and logic rhetoric, our
Speaker 2: ability to chain reasoning together, our ability to ask who, what, why,
Speaker 2: we're when it's our great leveler of the playing field.
Speaker 2: Because this is how they got one over on us.
Speaker 2: So doesn't it make sense then to learn the information
Speaker 2: that they took in order to propubly fight back.
Speaker 1: This all goes back to the debate and argument soccrate
Speaker 1: in style right, how how to think your way through
Speaker 1: these types of things? And that that's what was stolen
Speaker 1: from us and that's what they utilize against us. But
Speaker 1: I was going to say, I'm glad you brought up
Speaker 1: the kabbala, because this is another good point to good
Speaker 1: time to drop in the fact that it's the Luri
Speaker 1: and kabbala that they are implementing. And this is again
Speaker 1: showing that the seventeen eighties, give or take, is right
Speaker 1: around the time that the Freema Sonic leord was overhauled,
Speaker 1: if you will, co opted, infiltrated, and you have Robison
Speaker 1: talking about that, you have others talking about that, you
Speaker 1: have the you know, the Jezzits being disbanded going in there,
Speaker 1: like we said before, but also you know Sabotine Frankism, right,
Speaker 1: that's another it's another key element. That element in there
Speaker 1: makes them tied very closely to a certain chosen people
Speaker 1: because it's a lot of their well they call it
Speaker 1: Jewish mysticism or but it's so thick. It's all kinds
Speaker 1: of different things that were rolled into that because of
Speaker 1: the influences that Lara and Laria had and his predecessors
Speaker 1: and things like that. So it's basically a conglomerate of magic.
Speaker 1: It's different types of methods of control all that stuff,
Speaker 1: and this idea of supremacy over other man. That's where
Speaker 1: they're headed with it. And when they're telling these things
Speaker 1: to people, even if you're an initiative, even if you
Speaker 1: go through different mess on aquarter, if you're not one
Speaker 1: of the in group, they will wipe you off the
Speaker 1: board just like everyone else. You are dispensable, you're soldier.
Speaker 1: So that's where we're at right now, and I think
Speaker 1: they're pretty much have closed closed in So then Wyoming
Speaker 1: is on fire by the way, everybody, and there's resources
Speaker 1: there too.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So we talked about the Cabala, the Freemason's Illuminati.
Speaker 2: We didn't bring up the Jesuits, but we can see
Speaker 2: that the Jesuits are involved in the counter Reformation, really right,
Speaker 2: and in many ways they're the entering wedge between us
Speaker 2: and our source again, our source to the higher existence,
Speaker 2: whatever we want to call that God, our Maker, the Creator,
Speaker 2: the architect, or whatever. The Catholic Church really got in
Speaker 2: between us and our source, much like trade unionism got
Speaker 2: between us and our source of income. And so I
Speaker 2: think that that's where the common link is because when
Speaker 2: you look at the history of religion or Christianity itself,
Speaker 2: you can see on one side of the tree, it's
Speaker 2: all largely Catholic Orthodox that has never changed. But then
Speaker 2: on the whole other side of the tree is where
Speaker 2: they've stepped away from God and science and man measuring
Speaker 2: and calculating is going to take place of God as
Speaker 2: the higher being. So you can see that there's a
Speaker 2: total commonality parallels between the Jesuits, the American Progressives, the Fabians,
Speaker 2: all of these guys, and so this is the common
Speaker 2: grounds of which they you know, first agreed upon and
Speaker 2: then they together developed everything into the twentieth century. It's
Speaker 2: much like the Godfather film where they all sit around
Speaker 2: the round table and sort of divvy up their responsibilities
Speaker 2: heading into a whole new era because heroin and drugs
Speaker 2: are now entering in it. And so you see in
Speaker 2: that movie even that they don't want to get involved
Speaker 2: in the drugs. Some don't they want to just keep
Speaker 2: it in alcohol, but they evolve into you know, pushing
Speaker 2: narcotics and crack cocaine and cocaine and all of those things.
Speaker 2: So it's very similar the Paris Peace Conference. This is
Speaker 2: where they just all sat and actually it's lead up
Speaker 2: to those the Inner Allied Conferences of which you know,
Speaker 2: the founder of Fabianism is the chairman when they actually
Speaker 2: established the Leaga Nations. This is something else that people
Speaker 2: don't understand. They think it's all Woodrow Wilson, but it's
Speaker 2: actually not George Bernard Shaw but Sydney Webb, the chairs
Speaker 2: the inter Allied meetings and the making of the Leaga Nations.
Speaker 2: So having said all of that, let's go to our
Speaker 2: friend Albert Pike, and I just want to show this
Speaker 2: interesting thing. Can you see a ku Klux plan guy
Speaker 2: riding with a burning cross? I mean, this image is incredible.
Speaker 1: Problem reaction solution because the reconstruction was the reason why
Speaker 1: what they did to the in the reconstruction. And this
Speaker 1: is another thing you get from Crimes and cob Rips
Speaker 1: in American politics by Donald Jefferies, is they were taking
Speaker 1: the lowest scoundrels and putting him in offices of like
Speaker 1: judge and things like that, and destroying the South even further.
Speaker 1: And the blatant barbarism of women being raped. And yes
Speaker 1: they were from brown people. So there was the reaction,
Speaker 1: and it was an organic one at first, but obviously
Speaker 1: everything changes after that, and the way they present things
Speaker 1: after the fact makes it look pretty awful. Right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So you got nineteen twenty four a book published
Speaker 2: by Susan Lawrence Davis, The Authentic History of Ku Klux
Speaker 2: Klan eighteen sixty five to eighteen seventy seven. Okay, and
Speaker 2: that's interesting here Golan bones right there, Golan bones right
Speaker 2: on his thing. And what's this really resembling?
Speaker 1: The could be the Maltese Cross from the Knights of Alta,
Speaker 1: could be you know something Roman. You know.
Speaker 2: The Freemasons. We were talking about the Keepers, the Keepers
Speaker 2: of Jesus or you know, the protectors of Jesus. So
Speaker 2: I could see that there, and that wouldn't surprise me
Speaker 2: that those are two connected things. But what I want
Speaker 2: to show people.
Speaker 1: This is the nice, the the intertwining of the and
Speaker 1: the and the what do you call it? Oh, let's
Speaker 1: go all that opened. What is this that you're looking at.
Speaker 2: We're in archive dot org, so I urge everybody to
Speaker 2: go there. If there's a book you know that's out
Speaker 2: of print, it'll be there. And this is how we've
Speaker 2: built our entire story is through books on archive dot org.
Speaker 1: And a lot of them. You can actually download the
Speaker 1: PDF too, if you have a different reading.
Speaker 2: Take it with you and you can see what I
Speaker 2: can do here. This is what I do. All save
Speaker 2: image and put it into a file all of its own,
Speaker 2: and then that's mine and so if this book is
Speaker 2: removed from the Internet, I still have it. And if
Speaker 2: I don't have that save image right click, I'll actually
Speaker 2: screenshot two parts of that page put it into paint
Speaker 2: linkt together, so that's always mine, so that you know,
Speaker 2: worst case scenario, we'll always have the source material.
Speaker 1: How come only says three to seventeen and you're okay,
Speaker 1: said right, it's different than the bottoms two seventy through sixteen, gotcha.
Speaker 2: Yeah. This is the one sort of convoluted aspect to
Speaker 2: archive dot org is that the numbers across the bottom
Speaker 2: aren't going to match with the actual page numbers, or
Speaker 2: you know, seldom do, but they actually do here. So
Speaker 2: this is showing General Albert Pike in this history of
Speaker 2: the Ku Klux Klan. He was born in Boston, Massachusetts,
Speaker 2: December eighteen oh nine, and it shows here that he
Speaker 2: went to Harvard. Yes, yes, okay, he began to teach
Speaker 2: at the age of fifteen, so he's probably one of
Speaker 2: these people that are smart. I mean, he's getting his
Speaker 2: Bachelor of Arts too.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine could you imagine being a little person
Speaker 1: and sitting in a class being taught by a fifteen
Speaker 1: year old I mean you would have to have some
Speaker 1: high respect for that person in the way.
Speaker 2: Well, right, Norbert Wiener is doing it, Charles Homer Haskins
Speaker 2: is doing it. Both at Harvard. They're sixteen seventeen teaching
Speaker 2: courses because they are child proteges. But really they're not.
Speaker 2: They weren't born geniuses. They were fed liberal arts, the
Speaker 2: Greek classics, Latin very early in life.
Speaker 1: There.
Speaker 2: You know, some of these guys are reading incredible works
Speaker 2: before they're even ten, and their parents know it. The
Speaker 2: dads know it that this is how we have to
Speaker 2: prepare our student or our you know, son or daughter
Speaker 2: to be managers of society in the future. So one
Speaker 2: last page for me, and then we can answer questions
Speaker 2: or get the heck out of here, whatever you want
Speaker 2: to do.
Speaker 1: So there's some really weird people out there. I was
Speaker 1: just going to say, I guess having a business, I
Speaker 1: guess some really weird stuff. This in my way, I'm
Speaker 1: just a musing on the side there.
Speaker 2: Let's see. Okay.
Speaker 1: Then they said again bulletproof information.
Speaker 2: Yes, I love it. It really is bulletproof. And the
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm sure you can always find holes in
Speaker 2: our approach, but we've taken the most efficient productive way, right,
Speaker 2: primary source, the historical method comparing actual physical artifacts.
Speaker 1: Not Yeah, you know, like it's resources the process. So
Speaker 1: you're going to find more stuff as you go. You know,
Speaker 1: as you keep digging, you're going to see other things
Speaker 1: and you'll see more of what you're uncovering. And it's
Speaker 1: just how it works.
Speaker 2: And that is what we're doing here. You know, we're
Speaker 2: every week I'm coming here with more information that's important.
Speaker 1: Out of the way.
Speaker 2: We're just you know, viewers and listeners that are watching.
Speaker 2: This is really at the cutting edge of our research.
Speaker 2: It's I wasn't able to do this before because I
Speaker 2: hadn't gone as deep as I have. But now there's
Speaker 2: just such a wide breadth of information that we can
Speaker 2: actually do that and just sort of follow my research.
Speaker 2: So give me one second. I want this the Kansas
Speaker 2: City Scottish right page. So we got a picture of
Speaker 2: a young Albert Pike. You see that. Yeah, So Kansas City,
Speaker 2: Scottish right. Orient of Missouri Southern juris double eagle broea right, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: and that's actually on the cover of Morals and Dogma too.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And it's the raw Child's to get that going
Speaker 1: on there's Germany too, IMF or something like that. Maybe
Speaker 1: this pis sorry, go ahead, it's I think it pre
Speaker 1: dates Eagle, but it's it's the Hygeian dialectic in a
Speaker 1: sense because your mouth right, Yeah.
Speaker 2: That's a good point. Yeah, yep. And then you know,
Speaker 2: turns into the single eagle just one, which is interesting.
Speaker 1: Which would be synthesis.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, great point. That is a great point. The
Speaker 2: synthesis becomes America. So you can see his credentials. Obviously,
Speaker 2: he's a thirty third degree Master Mason.
Speaker 1: Were part of I said, we are new Atlantis after all,
Speaker 1: according to Yeah Francis Bacon, right.
Speaker 2: So brother Pike would be awarded an honorary Master of
Speaker 2: Arts degrees. So honorary Master of Arts. He's skipping right
Speaker 2: past the BA and going right to the Master. And
Speaker 2: I would imagine that as a thirty third degree Mason,
Speaker 2: he's fully educated in the liberal arts. This is what
Speaker 2: drives Freemasonry, it's what drives cabal, it's what drives the
Speaker 2: American university system, the same information.
Speaker 1: It's so weird because somebody people of this hive into
Speaker 1: wouldn't see the error in their thought process unless it's
Speaker 1: delivered done so or just devoid of that thing that
Speaker 1: people need to have, which is a conscience and empathy.
Speaker 2: Well, i'll tell you right now, I'm talking with a PhD.
Speaker 2: He's a history professor from a university that has done
Speaker 2: work on Brandeis. I think I've shown you some of
Speaker 2: his work.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he talked about him at least, and he.
Speaker 2: Thinks I'm crazy with some of the things I've said.
Speaker 2: But as soon as he has time to look, he's
Speaker 2: going to see he's very well aware of Brandeis's influence
Speaker 2: on the creation of Israel and him being a Zionist leader.
Speaker 2: He knows all of that. But that's only one chapter
Speaker 2: of the ten part series we did on Brandis. I'm
Speaker 2: trying to show him that he's the coiner of the
Speaker 2: term scientific management, that he's the architect of the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 2: that he really establishes Israel and US foreign policy all
Speaker 2: at the same time. And so he has an issue
Speaker 2: with me even calling Brandeis a progressive. But this is
Speaker 2: just documented. This is so I'm waiting for him to
Speaker 2: sort of look into our work and verify for himself
Speaker 2: that Brandeis is first of all the progressive, but he's
Speaker 2: really the maker of our modern day social contract. A
Speaker 2: lot of the things, almost everything that we struggle under
Speaker 2: today had its origins in this progressive era nineteen hundred
Speaker 2: to nineteen twenty. And Brandeis is really the architect of
Speaker 2: at all. They call him the Sage Advisor. I'm on
Speaker 2: this this lecture last night talking about Wilson and the
Speaker 2: progressive era, not one mention of Brandeis. I recorded it
Speaker 2: all so if anybody ever wants to see that, I
Speaker 2: could actually publish it. I took over the chat. There
Speaker 2: was a whole bunch of people at the beginning saying, Hey,
Speaker 2: glad to be here, good to be here. And then
Speaker 2: I dropped a couple bombs and there wasn't really a
Speaker 2: word after that. And and I had I had a
Speaker 2: meeting or run in with a Phi Beta Kapa Summa
Speaker 2: cum laude on Facebook, because Chris Christofferson died this week
Speaker 2: and he's a Phi Beta Kappa Summa cum laude, and
Speaker 2: so I just said, you know, he's he's a manager
Speaker 2: of society. He's a pioneer of outlaw country music. They're
Speaker 2: infiltrating every aspect of our life. They control. I mean,
Speaker 2: this is why all of popular music, whether you're talking
Speaker 2: country music, rap, hip hop, rock and roll, it all
Speaker 2: follows that intro verse chorus, solo, verse chorus, outro model
Speaker 2: of a vehicle.
Speaker 1: Because repetition is what his hypnosis is all about.
Speaker 2: And this is created by Adorno, Tavistock Macy conferences. So really,
Speaker 2: if you want to listen to country music, you just
Speaker 2: take the shell of the vehicle off, put a truck
Speaker 2: on there. You want to listen to rock and roll,
Speaker 2: you take the chassis off or the cover it off
Speaker 2: and put a new one. This is really how I
Speaker 2: look at pop music now.
Speaker 1: It's all the same, and they're merging it more with
Speaker 1: hip hop two now with like people like Jelly roll
Speaker 1: and People and all those others.
Speaker 2: This is a great point because this is what Quincy
Speaker 2: Jones wanted to do. He want this is what it's
Speaker 2: really the bringing about of world music. Right, we're gonna
Speaker 2: have one world government, one religion. Well, we're gonna have
Speaker 2: one music and it's gonna be mulatto, somewhere between white
Speaker 2: and dark. And it just fits the model of everything.
Speaker 2: And so the research that I've been doing lately because
Speaker 2: this is kind of where I want to go into
Speaker 2: the pop music and the creation through Tin pan Alley,
Speaker 2: the publishing houses and how they exploited the singer songwriter,
Speaker 2: the intelligent creatives, just like they do today and you know,
Speaker 2: Stegle all of their publishing rights. This is why musicians
Speaker 2: end up dead broke. And you know, h David Geffen's
Speaker 2: a billionaire because the same model works today.
Speaker 1: So they can't even kill you for your catalog? Is
Speaker 1: that right, mister Jackson? Right?
Speaker 2: And so he was who was he pointing the finger
Speaker 2: out before he was gone? Right? There's famous conversations where
Speaker 2: he's saying the Jew controls everything. Yes, right, So I'm
Speaker 2: just repeating what Michael Jackson stead of his sort of
Speaker 2: personal experience of being in Hollywood. And what's interesting there,
Speaker 2: I might add, is that his his album Thriller. It
Speaker 2: was one of the first albums I ever got. My
Speaker 2: mom bought it for me when I was a kid.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he was groomed too. I'm sure he went
Speaker 1: through the the not just the physical abuse from his father,
Speaker 1: but I'm sure there's more going on there too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And so I love that album like millions of
Speaker 2: millions of people did. And I thought the whole time,
Speaker 2: as I'm sitting listening to that album all my life.
Speaker 2: I'm like, yeah, it must be a pretty good band
Speaker 2: of black rhythm and blues players that he's hired. Or
Speaker 2: this must be Michael Jackson's backup band that he takes
Speaker 2: on tour. No, that's Toto, like Rose Toto, like Africa Toto.
Speaker 2: That is the backup band for Michael Jackson's thriller. This
Speaker 2: opens the door into the Wrecking Crew, this studio group
Speaker 2: of studio musicians that could play anything. They were super talented.
Speaker 2: So if you had like a band like Rat come
Speaker 2: in or Poison and C. C. Deville couldn't pull off
Speaker 2: the solos, they would have people come in and they
Speaker 2: wouldn't get songwriting credits. And this this is one of
Speaker 2: these illusionary things that we think is happening too, that
Speaker 2: you know, our greatest musicians actually created all this music. No,
Speaker 2: it's oftentimes a scientific expert with little glasses that knows
Speaker 2: how to put chords and you know, harmonies together to
Speaker 2: to move people through through music.
Speaker 1: You're gonna make me say something that's gonna be sounding
Speaker 1: really awful, like when it comes to hip hop and
Speaker 1: dropping beats, do you really think it's the monkey pressing
Speaker 1: the bunts. I just said it wasn't supposed to the
Speaker 1: idiot pressing the bunk And is that you know before
Speaker 1: that he was a drug dealer or do you think
Speaker 1: it's somebody else? You know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Beats, because those beats actually have to do with your
Speaker 1: psyche when they're manipulating your mind.
Speaker 2: To buy oral beats, right, the frequencies that your brain
Speaker 2: works on. And even the the two turntable thing that
Speaker 2: they use to scratch that was first invented by the military.
Speaker 1: They couldn't they couldn't figure out a crash register. Do
Speaker 1: you think they know all the buttons on a freaking soundboard?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Yeah? So, yeah, I kind of went off on a
Speaker 2: tangent there. I don't know what my my conclusion or
Speaker 2: point was.
Speaker 1: I hope I made it, but oh yeah, so I
Speaker 1: was gonna say the aptly named band Garbage that was
Speaker 1: a coliporate rock band too.
Speaker 2: Sure, that's Anton Vig right, the drummer. He's the guy
Speaker 2: that famously records Nirvana. And yeah, uh, I mean we
Speaker 2: could go deep into and we are going to because
Speaker 2: you know, like the song by Lit in the nineties
Speaker 2: called My own worst enemy. Mm hm, surprise, you forget
Speaker 2: about the things I said when I was drunk. I
Speaker 2: didn't mean to call you that.
Speaker 1: Everybody's gonna have that stuck in their head and they're
Speaker 1: gonna blame you.
Speaker 2: Now, now go and watch the video. You want to
Speaker 2: talk about manipulation, psychological manipulation. The video is just of
Speaker 2: them bowling and having a good time drinking party, and
Speaker 2: they're the band at the bowling alley, so they they're
Speaker 2: playing there. They're showing them bowling and then a group
Speaker 2: of girls comes in and so they start to hang
Speaker 2: out with the group of girls and they're just having
Speaker 2: a party, throwing the balls down the lanes. But the
Speaker 2: song is about him waking up in the morning drunk.
Speaker 2: He can't remember why his car is in the front yard,
Speaker 2: why he climbs through the window, why there's still a
Speaker 2: cigarette burning in his ash tray, and where's his girlfriend?
Speaker 2: She's gone, And so in the actual lyrics, they're talking
Speaker 2: about all the bad times, but never do you see that.
Speaker 2: You only see the good times that happened in the
Speaker 2: you know, in the video, they just portray the good times.
Speaker 2: So this is that maximizing of pleasure and the avoidance
Speaker 2: of pain. That's Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism. So you see this
Speaker 2: this vein of psychological operation going on in almost all music,
Speaker 2: most pronounced in the ones you would expect like rock
Speaker 2: and roll. I mean rock and roll, the term itself
Speaker 2: was a synonym being used for sex. So you look
Speaker 2: at Elvis Presley's hip and all of those things, including
Speaker 2: the Beatles, and then you get into bands like Kiss
Speaker 2: that are doing really.
Speaker 1: Knights in general, what knights in Satan's service, right, But
Speaker 1: they're spitting.
Speaker 2: Blood and they're blowing things up, and they're really degenerate.
Speaker 2: And it's you know who is Gene Simmons and Paul
Speaker 2: Stanley but two Jews. And so there's there's spreading devauchery
Speaker 2: around America and around the world. And this is really
Speaker 2: what concerts are meant to be. When you look at
Speaker 2: how the CIA Opera raided even before rock and roll music,
Speaker 2: they would associate, they would they would go with like
Speaker 2: the Boston Symphony Orchestra. If they were going to go
Speaker 2: to Europe and do a tour in Europe, they would
Speaker 2: be heavily uh operated by the CIA. Because when you
Speaker 2: operate like that, you can get into avenues and get
Speaker 2: influence over people that you may not have if they
Speaker 2: knew that you were just an intelligence or political diplomat.
Speaker 1: Right right, And most of the music from and like
Speaker 1: you have to have a stock on that side. You
Speaker 1: had you know, local Canyon on this side. And that
Speaker 1: hasn't stopped just because the sixties are over, because Little
Speaker 1: Canyon doesn't talk about that. They just knew it everywhere
Speaker 1: else now it's just widespread. But that's all military operations.
Speaker 1: We manipulated mind when they wanted to feed the corporate prisons.
Speaker 1: That's where gangs rap came from. Teach people to do
Speaker 1: stupid ship. So they go to jail, yep, And we
Speaker 1: know that.
Speaker 2: That they're they're bringing drugs into the urban areas of
Speaker 2: Los Angeles. They're distributing crack cocaine and trying to break
Speaker 2: apart society, fragment it. And so you see a move
Speaker 2: to take the black man out of the house. It's
Speaker 2: all an attack on the family, whether you have dark
Speaker 2: skin or white skin. I mean, we're clearly seeing that today.
Speaker 1: I think I just recently discovered something that I didn't
Speaker 1: discover it. It was a nineteen eleven book, but there
Speaker 1: may very well, be something out there, a different a
Speaker 1: type of lens using cyan, a type of like a
Speaker 1: blue tinge that you literally will be looking at through
Speaker 1: like they live type of glasses.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: It shows another level of the color spectrum and you
Speaker 1: can see different things like auras. But apparently you could
Speaker 1: also see some really crazy stuff that you weren't supposed
Speaker 1: to So that squashed out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so the.
Speaker 1: Bowl, if you didn't have a frequency suppressing your brain,
Speaker 1: you might also see it.
Speaker 2: That type of thing. What's the word that you said, cyan.
Speaker 1: Cyan is the color, right, cyanide. There's there's something about
Speaker 1: cian and the you know, the blue lodge. You know,
Speaker 1: there's there's a there's a symbolism there.
Speaker 2: Well. The one common color that's always brought up in
Speaker 2: neo noir films, especially the classical ones, is blue, the
Speaker 2: blue dahlia.
Speaker 1: It's getting people from the from the from the you
Speaker 1: know the depictions, Yeah, intro all that crap.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, So I think that's all I got for today.
Speaker 2: We're going to continue down this path into the administrative
Speaker 2: man and they furthering changing images of man throughout the
Speaker 2: twentieth century into this corporate model. Hopefully I can bring
Speaker 2: some more of that next week. We can also get
Speaker 2: into the origins of the Rockefeller Medical Institute. There's some
Speaker 2: interesting information I can pass on there, the fund origins,
Speaker 2: who was there, who was doing these studies, who the
Speaker 2: Rockefellers were funding, and this is the very origins of
Speaker 2: our medical industry.
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's listen.
Speaker 2: This week we can too.
Speaker 1: Let's see if we can look at land grants for
Speaker 1: colleges in universities and what do you want to know
Speaker 1: there land grants? Well, this is this is how they
Speaker 1: spread their their influence. Yeah, if you look at Professor
Speaker 1: Hamamoto in his work, you'll see where this all cantaxt
Speaker 1: so he was.
Speaker 2: Where was he? Well, this is the morell land grand acts,
Speaker 2: right that we were talking about eighteen sixty two and
Speaker 2: eighteen ninety probably, Yeah, this is the establishment of the
Speaker 2: whole network of universities.
Speaker 1: In addition to that, there was a couple of other things.
Speaker 1: I was going to say, Oh fuck, I fucking loss it.
Speaker 1: There was that one aspect that was the smallest part
Speaker 1: of it that I wanted to say.
Speaker 2: I can't that that was construction to do with land grants.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was that was the smallest element of what
Speaker 1: I was going to say about is I be's for Hamamoto. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's he's hard to take sometimes.
Speaker 2: I think he's all, look look at it.
Speaker 1: He's got a lot of stuff about the he kind
Speaker 1: of just he kind of just peppers it in because
Speaker 1: he was a university professor for a while, so he
Speaker 1: uh and he kind of got pushed out of his
Speaker 1: job for his uh, his position and his beliefs. So
Speaker 1: there's something maybe potentially legitimate there. But he's also been
Speaker 1: on info Wars a lot, so it's there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what I mean, So I think I know
Speaker 2: who you're talking about it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and he's he's very self Uh, he blows smoke
Speaker 1: up his own aight hole an awful lot. He's awfully
Speaker 1: he's offuly a proud of himself. So it's like I said,
Speaker 1: it's a little hard to take sometimes, and he's uh,
Speaker 1: definitely one of those people. Yeah, he thinks very highly
Speaker 1: of himself, usually a sheer sign of not being very intellectual, right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because it shows an insecurity and internal insecurity if
Speaker 2: you're constantly.
Speaker 1: If you're wasting too much time, right, and if you're
Speaker 1: wasting too much time focusing on yourself. You're not really
Speaker 1: focusing on the things that you say you're extort exactly.
Speaker 2: Self promotion is one of the things I do just
Speaker 2: because I find it's not important. The information is the
Speaker 2: most important. So I'm just trying to get this picture
Speaker 2: that I promised i'd bring up. Yeah, that's a good
Speaker 2: shot of it. See if I can bring that up,
Speaker 2: just to show that.
Speaker 1: So there was you know, I'm gonna have to look.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to listen back to that last part
Speaker 1: where you were leading up, because something that you had
Speaker 1: said sparked the idea that I there was like three
Speaker 1: separate things that I wanted to discuss in future topics. Yes,
Speaker 1: I would like to see the Darwinism thing, but that's
Speaker 1: something I can do. I actually probably do on my
Speaker 1: side too, just to pick up the things. So like
Speaker 1: the Metaphysical Club, I wanted, the ex club and all
Speaker 1: that stuff. I want to look a little bit more
Speaker 1: to that. But also there was something else and I
Speaker 1: just for some reason I lost it.
Speaker 2: Now, my bad, that's no, you didn't do it.
Speaker 1: You didn't do it. It was me and things. Just
Speaker 1: when I'm when I'm expelling one thought, another one disappears.
Speaker 1: In my head. It just no, it's not not a
Speaker 1: lot of room in there, you know, right, yeah, So
Speaker 1: what's your take on all this craziness weatherwise.
Speaker 2: Hurricanes and all of that. But we do it. This
Speaker 2: is us. And again now I'm trying to do just
Speaker 2: the window. See if that works. Does that work? I
Speaker 2: don't know.
Speaker 1: You will do move it, move away from it and
Speaker 1: go to a different page and see.
Speaker 2: If it happens. Yes, I got the little stop share
Speaker 2: thing in my way. Let's see if this works. You
Speaker 2: got a staircase there, see a staircase.
Speaker 1: I see much of us.
Speaker 2: Okay, we're not gonna worry about it, but I will
Speaker 2: show that next week. I'll make sure that it's up
Speaker 2: or in a way that we can see it. So
Speaker 2: and I should probably do some homework on how to
Speaker 2: navigate here a little bit better before our next one.
Speaker 2: But it's a picture of a staircase with a landing
Speaker 2: on it. There's two landings actually. But the first five
Speaker 2: steps are our senses of taste, smell, feeling, seeing, and hearing,
Speaker 2: and those coincide with the five aspects of architecture Composite, Corinthian, Ionic, Doric, Tuscan.
Speaker 2: And then the above the landing is seven more stairs,
Speaker 2: and they lead weirdly to an opening in a brick
Speaker 2: wall that looks poorly built if I was to look
Speaker 2: at it as from a carpenter's eye. But those seven
Speaker 2: steps are labeled grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, music, astronomy.
Speaker 2: That's the seven liberal arts. So that's a Masonic drawing,
Speaker 2: and it's just showing that the importance of our five senses. Okay,
Speaker 2: this is what the trivium really teaches too. This is
Speaker 2: an aspect of logic and why our gut instinct is
Speaker 2: so important, despite what the mainstream will tell you about that. Oh,
Speaker 2: don't trust your gut, no do. This is the synthesis
Speaker 2: of all of your five senses, and if your gut's
Speaker 2: telling you something wrong, listen to it. Okay, So i'll
Speaker 2: show you that next week. See it's fairly easy to
Speaker 2: find online too. But that's all I got, my friend.
Speaker 1: Okay, And I will continue to try to contemplate what
Speaker 1: it was. I was gonna there was something there and
Speaker 1: I was talking.
Speaker 2: About to remember right after that. Yes, it was to
Speaker 2: do with land grants.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that was just the one thing. Though it wasn't
Speaker 1: there were like three separate things, but they were kind
Speaker 1: of going back to like the starting, the starting jumping
Speaker 1: off point of being like you know, civil or a
Speaker 1: little bit after and you know, walking it out through
Speaker 1: that timeframe to show the different levels of when things
Speaker 1: ended here and then when things started with them and
Speaker 1: end the flipping of our country.
Speaker 2: And I think what I was saying there was making
Speaker 2: parallels or common ground between the Kabbala, Freemasonry, the Association
Speaker 2: of American Universities are all driven by this secret knowledge
Speaker 2: that is called the Trivium and is the Liberal Arts
Speaker 2: seven Liberal Arts. So I encourage everybody to go look
Speaker 2: at that book, read the introduction. I'm pretty sure that
Speaker 2: your viewers will be able to capably go through there
Speaker 2: and understand at least sort of the concept and the
Speaker 2: general idea of what it means to have a Liberal
Speaker 2: Arts degree, meaning that you can now live a life,
Speaker 2: you can make a living, not just a job having
Speaker 2: a job cog. Yeah, yeah, right, So this is they
Speaker 2: would rather have you utilitarian. And there is definitely obviously
Speaker 2: uses for the utilitarian artist, a much better way to
Speaker 2: say plumber or carpenter, I'm a utilitarian artist. Excuse me,
Speaker 2: So yeah, This is to separate the utilitarian arts and
Speaker 2: fine arts from the liberal arts and your ability to
Speaker 2: actually walk the planet with nothing in your hands and
Speaker 2: still make income because it's intrinsic into your.
Speaker 1: That's awful that you know what that makes me think
Speaker 1: of when you say it that way. The merchants and
Speaker 1: bandits that have taken over our world because they always
Speaker 1: utilize other people's efforts. Yes, they're just the brokers, the
Speaker 1: merchants and thieves. Right, they don't have anything, they don't
Speaker 1: have to do anything. They just have to move the
Speaker 1: pieces that everybody else has created. Right.
Speaker 2: Oh, they've got everybody working against their own self interest.
Speaker 1: Hey, I haven't brought the second one, but everybody grab this.
Speaker 1: It's on your website and it's also at Amazon and
Speaker 1: Barnes and Noble. Oh yeah, let's hold about together. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: you had the bigger room. Yeah, there you go double
Speaker 1: Barnes and Noble and he has the Amazon.
Speaker 2: And I don't know if you can even get this book,
Speaker 2: but go and look for it because it talks about
Speaker 2: fermentation and how all of our diets and they are
Speaker 2: horrible diets that we've had over the last couple of generations.
Speaker 2: Is actually leading to all of these things that she's well.
Speaker 1: Just look at the dummy downa society too, just even
Speaker 1: like because that a lot of that is going to
Speaker 1: be vacuinally related in addition to our deficiencies. But I mean,
Speaker 1: that's that's a that's a really important thing. In addition
Speaker 1: to that, how is it affecting people's cognition and ability
Speaker 1: to even understand when is being told to them? Yeah,
Speaker 1: this suppression but like, oh everybody is stupid. They have
Speaker 1: at r qu Imagine if that's not permanent and it's
Speaker 1: just a state that they're in right now because of
Speaker 1: middle nutritional deficiencies, and it may take more than ninety
Speaker 1: days to bring yourself back to it after a lifetime
Speaker 1: of you know, eating the wrong things, all the poisons
Speaker 1: that they have on us five G suppression of everything
Speaker 1: that happens on the you know, very microscopic level of
Speaker 1: us too. We might not recognize it. It's not just
Speaker 1: about radiation and radiation poisoning. There's other ways that affects
Speaker 1: you and vibration in your brain waves, so all of that.
Speaker 1: But if you neutrify your body, you're more resistant to that.
Speaker 1: Imagine because doctor Manzo he said, he's way more fluid
Speaker 1: with his thinking now ever since he's been doing the
Speaker 1: copper regiment and he's been doing extra copper for the
Speaker 1: last two years, and he actually created his own copper supplement.
Speaker 1: So it's pretty darn interesting.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I think you see that today in a
Speaker 2: deliberate moving us away from protein or telling us not
Speaker 2: to eat meat. Like there is a definite push back
Speaker 2: against eating meat, and it's really started by this climate
Speaker 2: change or the global warming narrative that it's not sustainable
Speaker 2: way to live. But all they're doing is removing the
Speaker 2: protein from your diet so that you can't think very clearly.
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm a market gardener. We grow vegetables, and
Speaker 2: so I'm a big advocate of eating vegetables, but I
Speaker 2: also say we should be eating meat, you know, not
Speaker 2: the stuff that they're putting on the shelves in the supermarket.
Speaker 2: But find a local rancher. You know, this is how
Speaker 2: we buy cows here. We'll go in on a cow
Speaker 2: with other people and it's from an honest, trustworthy ranch
Speaker 2: or farm and people that you can meet and know
Speaker 2: and you can talk to. And it's not meat in
Speaker 2: the supermarkets. That's been depleted of everything like that really
Speaker 2: light pink. You don't want to eat anything from the
Speaker 2: supermarket really well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, those colors can be injected in there too, and
Speaker 1: you don't create the instance of red pretty easily. And
Speaker 1: who knows what seerm there's it's bringing into it. Yeah yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: so there we have everybody. Yeah, thanks to I would
Speaker 1: say standard as well for people out there, does Azure
Speaker 1: well is who does doctor Monzo's something is? Doctor Gliddon
Speaker 1: recommends Azure Standard. They have drop off points too. If
Speaker 1: you're not able to get to natural farmer farm wherever
Speaker 1: you are, sometimes that's not possible. If you have an
Speaker 1: Azure Standard drop off drop point, you can get meats
Speaker 1: that way. And then on I want to say the
Speaker 1: East Coast and your I'm not sure how far off
Speaker 1: of Virginia there they go. But Polyface Farms with our
Speaker 1: friend Joe Sadalin that who was he?
Speaker 2: What's up with him?
Speaker 1: Oh no, he has his his poly Faced farms. He's
Speaker 1: another place to get meat and get good food.
Speaker 2: Dude, Like, if you could get meat from that guy,
Speaker 2: that's that's the ship. He's a He's totally influential in
Speaker 2: my life. I love that guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's a good dude for sure. Oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: we've had him on a long time in those a
Speaker 1: couple of.
Speaker 2: Years, no way, really yeah, cool, I'm gonna have to
Speaker 2: go back and look, is it still around and still available?
Speaker 1: Yeah? You know, you know, but also with time, I
Speaker 1: had probably become a better uh you know, video maker
Speaker 1: two and a video presenter, so i'd probably should redo it,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's an important interview, man, that's an important guy
Speaker 2: right now. He's standing up for our ability to grow
Speaker 2: food from the soil, not you know, like people are. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it was taking a lot too, yep, yep, So get
Speaker 2: behind him for sure.
Speaker 1: His farming method is pretty freaking ingenious.
Speaker 2: Too, right, Yeah, And I think that that aligns a
Speaker 2: little bit with Elliott Coleman, who we've we designed all
Speaker 2: of our farming off of. And I think it all
Speaker 2: comes from this ergonomic approach to farming. Uhh, I didn't
Speaker 2: get any notification. Rumble just got it.
Speaker 1: Rumble just knocked us off the fuck all right, Well, anyway,
Speaker 1: I guess that's it. We're done. I had things we're
Speaker 1: having troublestreaming to your destination. I wonder if they just
Speaker 1: killed my channel.
Speaker 2: Yeah, oh yeah, hopefully not, hopefully not. I have been.
Speaker 2: I think I'm hot in that the stuff that we're covering.
Speaker 2: Everywhere I go. We have technical glitches, and I've shown
Speaker 2: through recording that my comments on YouTube don't stick. It
Speaker 2: looks like they do. I'll go out, come back in
Speaker 2: they're gone. This routinely happens on Twitter, on Facebook, YouTube,
Speaker 2: all of it. So I've stated several times that I
Speaker 2: think that this progressive era, of this brandized Litman led
Speaker 2: New America, it is what is being hidden because as
Speaker 2: soon as everybody figures out the progressivism is what has
Speaker 2: influenced both parties and why it doesn't matter who you
Speaker 2: vote for they, I mean, this is how the two
Speaker 2: party paradigm was created, was the infusion of progressivism. They
Speaker 2: infiltrated both sides of the party and says, why, no
Speaker 2: matter what president is, you know in the Oval Office,
Speaker 2: US foreign policy is still in the Middle East and
Speaker 2: still killing people.
Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, we're just all satellites of Israel or of
Speaker 1: the central banks. What's the central banks in your country?
Speaker 2: Right? And Louis Brandeis makes the Federal Reserve and Israel
Speaker 2: and US foreign policy. So if that doesn't pique your
Speaker 2: interest to look into Lewis brandeis. I don't know what
Speaker 2: else will. He's, really, like I said several times, the
Speaker 2: main author of a lot of things that are going
Speaker 2: wrong in our society.
Speaker 1: All Right, we should call it here because apparently we
Speaker 1: lost the majority of our audience. So shoot, yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: maybe hopefully it's just the issue and not a me issue.
Speaker 1: But we'll talk to you next Wednesday. And if I'm
Speaker 1: not here on Rumble then we'll be also still on
Speaker 1: FTJ Media and on Twitter, which is I don't know
Speaker 1: why we do that because we have some friends up
Speaker 1: were there. Thanks for having me and if we if
Speaker 1: we lose, Brumble will jump back on to Brody on right.
Speaker 2: Well, thanks for having me on for the next week.
Speaker 1: To thank you, buddy, I got to run and get
Speaker 1: a tire, so I'll talk to you, okay,