Speaker 1: Go for the green with stay and play packages at
Speaker 1: the award winning Dancing Rabbit Golf Club. You'll love the
Speaker 1: comfort and convenience of the newly renovated Dancing Rabbit Inn.
Speaker 1: Beautiful single or double rooms and suites available. Or bring
Speaker 1: your group and stay at our elegant clubhouse room, golf
Speaker 1: and dine packages starting at one hundred and thirty nine dollars.
Speaker 1: Book today called eight sixty six four four Pearl or
Speaker 1: online at Pearl Riverresort dot com. It's Kate to Parl
Speaker 1: River Resort.
Speaker 2: Check out the podcast Missing Link Jones County. It is
Speaker 2: a podcast that reveals information gathered by Investigator bad Windom
Speaker 2: of the Jones County Sheriff Department. These cases will be
Speaker 2: discussed are based on Wyndham's own investigations and knowledge of
Speaker 2: each case. So join host Josh Guru Nichols and Jack
Speaker 2: Fairchild's as they discuss these cases bi weekly with investigator Wendom.
Speaker 2: This show was brought to you by the Laurel Leader
Speaker 2: Call and it is on all the major podcatchers such
Speaker 2: as iTunes, I Heart Radio, Spotify, Spreaker, Amazon Music. So
Speaker 2: like and subscribe to the podcast today. This show is
Speaker 2: a part of the Midnight Ride Network.
Speaker 1: Statue want to sing in Affairs and who will fly Tennis?
Speaker 2: Come to me here when you him out of the
Speaker 2: freedom starting a feel and it'll be like the whole
Speaker 2: man raining down, brought to courtesy and wild.
Speaker 1: And liberals be worn.
Speaker 2: Your viewpoints will be subjected to straight scrutiny.
Speaker 3: You're listening to Right Side Radio.
Speaker 2: It's like my eyes to be blown wide. We have
Speaker 2: come together here because the American people deserve better from
Speaker 2: those to whom they entrust, our nation's highest officers. We
Speaker 2: stand united and are resolved to do something about it,
Speaker 2: which whether we like it or not.
Speaker 3: Spell's Judy, You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
Speaker 1: You tuned into right Side Radio.
Speaker 2: All right, guys, you have found it. It is the
Speaker 2: Right Side Radio program recording this episode on Thursday, June twelfth,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. We're already in June. People this year.
Speaker 2: That's crazy to think about how quickly this year is
Speaker 2: rapidly disappearing on us. And of course we're dealing with
Speaker 2: a lot of insanity in the world and in our country,
Speaker 2: and we will continue to talk about that. Of course.
Speaker 2: I'm your host, Jack Fairchilds and I want to ask
Speaker 2: as always that you like and subscribe to the Right
Speaker 2: Side Radio program. Remember we're on all your favorite podcatchers.
Speaker 2: We're on Apple Podcast, We're on iHeartRadio, We're on Amazon Music, Spotify, Spreaker,
Speaker 2: so many more. So make sure that you have click
Speaker 2: that subscribe button on whichever podcatcher you're listening to us today.
Speaker 2: Help us continue to grow, share our podcast so others
Speaker 2: can find it and hear the conservative message that we
Speaker 2: are pushing folks, ah Man, A lot of stuff happening
Speaker 2: in the world today, and of course, if you've listened
Speaker 2: to the morning coffees, to the special Report this weekend,
Speaker 2: the story that continues to captivate our country is this war.
Speaker 2: I don't necessarily like calling it a war, but it is.
Speaker 2: It's not merely a pro test. These agitators, these riots
Speaker 2: that are happening out in California, particularly in the Los
Speaker 2: Angeles area, we are seeing imagery of shops, building cars burning,
Speaker 2: Mexican flags being flown above the chaos. It's a terrible
Speaker 2: look for Mexico and it's a terrible look for the
Speaker 2: Democrats who constantly try to tell us that they are peaceful.
Speaker 2: Protests were on are constantly hearing Democrats try to defend
Speaker 2: this type of behavior, try to defend everything that we're
Speaker 2: seeing going on. You've got some that we'll talk about
Speaker 2: who tell us that maybe we're not seeing what we
Speaker 2: think we're seeing. We'll talk about that and so much more.
Speaker 2: But it's just it's crazy that this is where we've
Speaker 2: come to. Barack Obama deported more people than Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Democrats didn't seem to have a problem with it when
Speaker 2: it was Barack Obama deporting folks, But because Trump, who
Speaker 2: they knew it was coming, because again it was part
Speaker 2: of his campaign promise to us. The fact that he's
Speaker 2: trying to act out these deportations, it's the worst thing ever.
Speaker 2: He's a criminal for wanting to do it. I've gone
Speaker 2: on record multiple times saying how much respect I have
Speaker 2: for the Mexican culture, for the Mexican people, But the
Speaker 2: thing that separates that respect and there is a certain
Speaker 2: level of respect for the law. Now. Look, I understand
Speaker 2: that some people sneak over because they feel it's their
Speaker 2: only way, but you're still you have still broken the law,
Speaker 2: and we need to we need to figure out a
Speaker 2: way to cut out the instances of lawlessness. We need
Speaker 2: to fine tune our immigration policy. We need to help
Speaker 2: folks that feel desperate have an easier path to our country.
Speaker 2: There are ways that we can do that. There are
Speaker 2: ways that we can come up to fine tune that.
Speaker 2: But the one thing that we cannot do, we cannot
Speaker 2: afford to do, is just open the borders and take
Speaker 2: everyone who wants to come across. That's what we've been doing. Yes,
Speaker 2: I know that the borders aren't technically open, but we've
Speaker 2: been turning a blind eye for decades and just giving
Speaker 2: a magic wand approach to grant amnesty to those who
Speaker 2: already here is an idiotic idea that I will never
Speaker 2: support because I also understand and that in doing that,
Speaker 2: you are inviting others to decide to try to sneak
Speaker 2: over before the Amnesty Act is signs, so that way
Speaker 2: they can also get the amnesty. We saw it when
Speaker 2: it was mistakenly done in the eighties, so we know
Speaker 2: that is the way that it will happen. It shouldn't
Speaker 2: happen again. We need to fine tune things. We need
Speaker 2: to ramp up our protection at the borders, whether it's
Speaker 2: a wall, whether it's other measures. They need something something
Speaker 2: in order to correct this problem. And we're seeing right
Speaker 2: now as we continue to watch what's happening out there
Speaker 2: in Los Angeles, you've got idiots from Hollywood trying to
Speaker 2: come up and lecture us about what is happening, even
Speaker 2: though they're wrong. You had Eva Longoria get up there
Speaker 2: and spread a false narrative that ice rated in the
Speaker 2: elementary school, which didn't happen. But again, where the fact
Speaker 2: checkers when it's a liberal again, they don't They don't
Speaker 2: like to point out when liberals that are pushing policies
Speaker 2: and ideas that they agree with are stretching the truth.
Speaker 2: They don't like. They don't like to expose them. Let
Speaker 2: me share a meme that is clearly a joke. Oh,
Speaker 2: you'll correct that, even though it's satire, sarcas and whatever
Speaker 2: you might want to call it. That needs to be corrected.
Speaker 2: But when an idiot like Eva Longoria gets up there
Speaker 2: and speaks falsehoods, well we'll just we'll just televise it.
Speaker 2: It's insane as we continue to watch this. It's insane
Speaker 2: as we watch what's happening. It's almost as insane is
Speaker 2: watching mainstream media outlets trying to give US explanations for
Speaker 2: why the protesters are flying a Mexican flag. Before we
Speaker 2: get into some of their protesters to some of their explanations,
Speaker 2: let me be clear, I don't need them to explain
Speaker 2: this to me. I know why they're flying the Mexican
Speaker 2: flags because they're siding with Mexican illegals. It shouldn't be happening,
Speaker 2: and it does present the appearance of a foreign invader.
Speaker 2: It's not a good look for the protest nor is
Speaker 2: it a good look for their position that these are
Speaker 2: peaceful protests, which they're not, because we see the evidence
Speaker 2: time and time again that they're not peaceful. President The
Speaker 2: Politico explained in a sub headline that flying the Mexican
Speaker 2: flag is a long tradition during times of anti immigration sentiment.
Speaker 2: It added that Angelica Sclassie, a prominent activist in the
Speaker 2: state and executive director of California Or of the Coalition
Speaker 2: for Humane Immigration Rights of Los Angeles, noted that protesters
Speaker 2: also hoisted the flag in two thousand and six during
Speaker 2: the massive demonstrations against George W. Bush era legislation to
Speaker 2: correct down on illegal immigration. They said, when you see
Speaker 2: a lot of young people with their flags it's also
Speaker 2: claiming and showing support for their parents. So many of
Speaker 2: the young people who are marching are US citizens, their
Speaker 2: second third generation, maybe they're first who were born in
Speaker 2: this country, very much US citizens by birth, but they
Speaker 2: want their parents to also know their standing for them.
Speaker 2: I feel like every time I ask a young person
Speaker 2: where they're carrying, whether they're carrying a Mexican flag, a
Speaker 2: Salvadorian flag, a Guatemalan flag, or any other flag, it's
Speaker 2: just about I want people to understand I'm proud of
Speaker 2: who I am. I'm not ashamed to be Mexican, and
Speaker 2: I'm certainly not ashamed of my parents, and I want
Speaker 2: them to know I will not reject them because there's
Speaker 2: a lot of pressure to reject Mexican heritage, is there, though.
Speaker 2: I mean again, if I go into town wanting to
Speaker 2: go get something to eat, there are nine thousand Mexican restaurants,
Speaker 2: there are Mexican grocery stores, there are entire communities that
Speaker 2: fully embrace the Mexican heritage. And I have no problem
Speaker 2: with any of that. Matter of fact, I think it's
Speaker 2: neat the same way I think a China town's need,
Speaker 2: the same way that I think little itaies and certain
Speaker 2: towns are neat Embrace your culture, embrace your heritage. There's
Speaker 2: nothing wrong with that. But that's not what this is.
Speaker 2: Despite their claims, despite the fact that they're sitting here
Speaker 2: trying to make claims that that's all this is, that's
Speaker 2: not And again, it's a bad look because it makes
Speaker 2: you look like you're the invaders you're being painted out
Speaker 2: to be, especially when you're doing it during acts of
Speaker 2: violence against our country. Be proud of your heritage, but
Speaker 2: don't act out in violence. Be proud that you're a Mexican,
Speaker 2: be proud that you're Guatemalan, Salvadorian, whatever. Be proud of
Speaker 2: your heritage. But when you fly that flag over burning cities, yeah, sorry,
Speaker 2: it's worth criticism. And there's no defense of it because
Speaker 2: you're doing it in the United States of America. You're
Speaker 2: burning cities and then flying a foreign flag as you're
Speaker 2: doing it. There's no defense of that, liberals, no matter
Speaker 2: how much you want to try to rationalize it. But
Speaker 2: they weren't alone because apparently in New York Times cited
Speaker 2: protesters who said they wanted to stand up for diversity
Speaker 2: against President Donald Trump's opposed intolerance. They cited a thirty
Speaker 2: two year old Bonnie Garcia, a US born citizen from
Speaker 2: Los Angeles. She said she had briefly considered stopping by
Speaker 2: to buy an American flag before attending the rally on
Speaker 2: Monday that denounced deployment of the National Guard troops in
Speaker 2: the city, but she stuck with her original plan to
Speaker 2: bring two small flags representing countries her parents came from.
Speaker 2: She says, I'm proud to be an American, but in
Speaker 2: these times, being a Californian it is what makes me proud,
Speaker 2: and seeing the diversity here and seeing that a lot
Speaker 2: of people haven't forgotten the roots. I feel like that's
Speaker 2: why Trump fears diversity and fears representation in people's faces,
Speaker 2: because he doesn't want people to remember. He wants to
Speaker 2: erase us, and I'm not going to stand for that. Well,
Speaker 2: first off, her statements idiotic, because Trump's not trying to
Speaker 2: erase you. He's trying to enforce or immigration laws. And
Speaker 2: if you're here legally, that's fine. But again, the whole
Speaker 2: point of illustrating is to show you where the media
Speaker 2: is going to They're going to go find people like this,
Speaker 2: and they're going to go find folks that they can
Speaker 2: cite and try to make you feel like they're flying
Speaker 2: of a foreign national flag as they burn American cities.
Speaker 2: It's just okay because they're just showing pride. Look, if
Speaker 2: California was handling things on their own, there'd be no
Speaker 2: need for the National Guard for the Marines to show
Speaker 2: up in town. And I have a lot of heartburn
Speaker 2: about sending in the Marines, but I understand that this
Speaker 2: is how California is not taking care of its own business.
Speaker 2: They're looting, they're destroying things. This is not just a
Speaker 2: peaceful protest, no matter how much the Left tries to
Speaker 2: defend it, no matter how much you get idiotic statements
Speaker 2: from morons like Nancy Pelosi, Let me play where and
Speaker 2: tell me again? Because why I don't totally disagree with
Speaker 2: her sentiment in this statement. I do think it's important
Speaker 2: to question where we heard this before.
Speaker 3: When there is a gathering, a large gathering of people,
Speaker 3: the anarchists see it as an opportunity and they move in.
Speaker 3: So always have to be careful whether you see a
Speaker 3: burned car or broken window or whatever it is. It
Speaker 3: may be the exuberance of the moment, but it may
Speaker 3: be the anarchist setting in I heard one of the
Speaker 3: former police chiefs of Los Angeles speak about this on Sunday, and.
Speaker 2: There you have it. Because we ourselves as conservatives to
Speaker 2: pointed out that there are bad actors that jump into
Speaker 2: protest and try to make one side look bad. They
Speaker 2: dismiss it when it's on their side. Now they're trying
Speaker 2: to use that same defense here. I'm not quite sure
Speaker 2: this is just bad actors, because I think there are
Speaker 2: a lot of folks on their side that are the
Speaker 2: bad actors in question. Again, I always think that a
Speaker 2: military response to a private city or local government should
Speaker 2: be the last resort. But what we've seen so far
Speaker 2: in California is these protesters are willing to ignore curfews.
Speaker 2: They're willing to destroy property, They're willing to rob and
Speaker 2: loot stores, bust out windows. This is not and this
Speaker 2: has also been a trend in Los Angeles. Whenever there
Speaker 2: is a protest, it often turns into riots. This is
Speaker 2: not an uncommon occurrence. You can call it bad actors,
Speaker 2: but it's more than bad actors, Nancy, and you know that.
Speaker 2: And the fact that the left has fostered these attitudes,
Speaker 2: the fact that the left has fostered everything that has
Speaker 2: turned into these new emotions, these new realities that we're
Speaker 2: dealing with. It's one of those things that is just
Speaker 2: utterly ridiculous that we're still seeing happen out there. But
Speaker 2: this is who they are, and it's crazy. Of course,
Speaker 2: you also have other folks trying to lie, like Senator
Speaker 2: Dick Darwin, who said yesterday that he has no recollection
Speaker 2: of his fellow Democrat Party colleagues referring to the anti
Speaker 2: ice protest in Los Angeles as peaceful. What do Democrats
Speaker 2: mean when they say that the riots in LA are peaceful?
Speaker 2: Durbin was asked by a reporter. He said, I've never
Speaker 2: heard them say that. Really, you've never heard them say that.
Speaker 2: Why Pelosi didn't outright say it, She inferred it by saying, no, no, no,
Speaker 2: these are just the bad actors that are doing it.
Speaker 2: He did come out and condemn the violence, whether it's
Speaker 2: in the Capitol or in LA because, of course, he
Speaker 2: wanted to make sure that he invokes January sixth, because
Speaker 2: that's all they know that They think, they think that's
Speaker 2: their get out of Jill card through all this, and
Speaker 2: it's not. Because it's Apple's to Orange just because last
Speaker 2: time I checked, heuring January six they weren't burning cars,
Speaker 2: they weren't right, they weren't looting storefronts. None of that
Speaker 2: happened during the January sixth. But of course, you know,
Speaker 2: Dick Darbin, being the brain dead heading the sand Democrat
Speaker 2: that he is, he completely ignored the fact that Senator
Speaker 2: Cory Booker. Booker said on Sundays Meet the Press, a
Speaker 2: lot of these peaceful protests are being generated because of
Speaker 2: the President of the United States is sewing chaos. You
Speaker 2: didn't hear that one from Corey Booker. They're old durban Oh,
Speaker 2: Dusty Durbin. Apparently he he I guess maybe he just
Speaker 2: doesn't watch Meet the Press because he apparently missed where
Speaker 2: Corey Booker said that, again, a lot of these peaceful
Speaker 2: protests are being generated because the President of the United
Speaker 2: States is sewing chaos. So it's crazy. So again, maybe
Speaker 2: he just missed that one. But he also missed Senator
Speaker 2: Alex Padelia, a Democrat from California, on MSAC, where it
Speaker 2: was said the vast majority of the protesters and demonstrators
Speaker 2: are peaceful, they're passionate. But Darbin missed that too. Apparently,
Speaker 2: So again, that's that's happening. Maybe he just maybe Dick
Speaker 2: Darbin despite all the glowing coverage, I'm sure he gets
Speaker 2: on MSNBC. Maybe maybe he just doesn't watch HIMSSNBC because
Speaker 2: very few people do. But what about and again I'm
Speaker 2: going to butcher his name. It's another California Democrat, Natty Bargain,
Speaker 2: who represents California's forty fourth district. Sorry for butchering your name,
Speaker 2: but was on the uh CNN State of the Union
Speaker 2: program on Sundays saying we are having an administration that's
Speaker 2: targeting peaceful protest. I guess he didn't hear that one either,
Speaker 2: but that happened. What about former Vice President Kamala Harris?
Speaker 2: What do you think? Do you think Old Dusty Dick
Speaker 2: missed this statement when she said that the ongoing chaos
Speaker 2: was overwhelmingly peaceful Hillary Clinton. She went on to describe
Speaker 2: on x California Governor Knewsom didn't request the National Guard
Speaker 2: be deployed to his states following peaceful demonstrations. Trump sent
Speaker 2: them anyway. It's the first time in sixty years a
Speaker 2: president has made this choice. Trump's goal isn't California safe?
Speaker 2: His goal is to cause chaos because chaos is good
Speaker 2: for Trump. Again, Durbin said he hadn't heard it. Maybe
Speaker 2: he missed the first the first couple of examples. I
Speaker 2: put a highly doubt he missed something that Corey Booker said.
Speaker 2: But maybe But did he miss what Hillary Clinton said?
Speaker 2: Did he miss what the former Vice president Kamala Harris said.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure I'm buying his nonsense. But again, he
Speaker 2: doesn't want to call out Democrats because that doesn't aid
Speaker 2: his side's argument, and he knows that they are in
Speaker 2: the wrong or else he would just go right along
Speaker 2: with them and claim that it was peaceful as well. Instead,
Speaker 2: he's just going to claim that the Democrats never said that,
Speaker 2: even though we have evidence after evidence, I can go along.
Speaker 2: These aren't just the only examples of Democrats who have
Speaker 2: said that I can continue to go on. What's sad
Speaker 2: is when you look up and you see that Democrat
Speaker 2: John Fetterman of Pennsylvania is the democrats only voice of
Speaker 2: reason these days. He called out the anarchy and true
Speaker 2: chaos that has occurred in Los Angeles and doubled down
Speaker 2: on his anti violence message. He put out a post
Speaker 2: that featured a do and do not list, which indicates
Speaker 2: that people should not loot, light stuff on fire, assault
Speaker 2: law enforcement, but they should protest peacefully organized to win
Speaker 2: elections and call out destructive behavior like this. In his tweet,
Speaker 2: it featured photos of burning vehicles. It's sad that Betterman
Speaker 2: has to put out a list that says, don't loot,
Speaker 2: don't light stuff on fire. Now, he used a more
Speaker 2: colorful adjective than you know, stuff, but you get the message.
Speaker 2: It's sad that he and it's also sad that Fetterman
Speaker 2: is the voice of reason in a very unreasonable Democrat party.
Speaker 2: But again, if we're going to be critical of Democrats,
Speaker 2: we'll give credit to the one who actually might have
Speaker 2: a little bit more common sense the rest. Maybe he
Speaker 2: actually understands that the Democrats lost elections last year because
Speaker 2: positions like this. Democrats lost positions last year because they
Speaker 2: were going down this path and because they're not smart
Speaker 2: enough to see this path, because they're not smart enough
Speaker 2: to understand this is why they lost the elections in
Speaker 2: the first place. They just continue to double down on it.
Speaker 2: The insanity that we continue to watch and the fact
Speaker 2: that you've got these morons in Hollywood out there stoking
Speaker 2: the flames because they're just they're not smart enough to
Speaker 2: even grasp a single issue. They've never lived in the
Speaker 2: real life, but they want to put themselves in there
Speaker 2: because you know what I was in that movie you like, so,
Speaker 2: by golly, you'll listen to me. They live in a
Speaker 2: pten land. They don't have a clue what's happening in
Speaker 2: the real world world. They're just useful idiots, and because
Speaker 2: they're for the most part, very unintelligent, they're easily manipulated.
Speaker 2: And that's the truth. And they don't they don't want
Speaker 2: me to tell you that, but that's that's the truth
Speaker 2: when you deal with them. When you see a CVS
Speaker 2: taking damages, you see a T mobile store on fire. Yeah,
Speaker 2: these are mostly peaceful protests, and that's always their focus.
Speaker 2: They've lost any bit of reality, they've lost any grasp
Speaker 2: on what's happening. The insanity that we continue to watch,
Speaker 2: the insanity that we continue to see put on full
Speaker 2: display here by those on the left, because they just
Speaker 2: they don't care to get anything right. They don't care
Speaker 2: to research. They're pushing an agenda at this point, and
Speaker 2: that's all they are concerned with. That's the reality, and
Speaker 2: no matter how much they want to try to pretend
Speaker 2: what you are seeing is not what you are seeing,
Speaker 2: it's very much real. It's very much real. That takes
Speaker 2: me to an ESPN contributor, Mina Clumes Menaci'm sorry. She
Speaker 2: has criticized media's coverage of the anti ice riots that
Speaker 2: have taken place in Los Angeles, Kent. She is making
Speaker 2: the claim the disparity between this is the exact quote,
Speaker 2: the disparity between what's actually happening in Los Angeles and
Speaker 2: the way it's being mischaracterized is one of the biggest
Speaker 2: stress tests of modern media in recent memory, bodied socials,
Speaker 2: AI odd clips, declining literacy. It's like singing in a
Speaker 2: broken emergency response system hit by a storm now again
Speaker 2: without more context. I don't know if she's criticizing the
Speaker 2: media for showing these images and that she's trying to
Speaker 2: claim that they are AI images. That's what I think
Speaker 2: she's saying, and based on what I know of her politics,
Speaker 2: she's an extreme left leaning individual who really and truly,
Speaker 2: if this is her takeaway, should stick to sports. The
Speaker 2: pretty average at covering sports to begin with, but she
Speaker 2: needs to stay out of the political arena. If she's
Speaker 2: trying to say that these images are AI generated, because
Speaker 2: I can assure you they are not, because the mainstream
Speaker 2: media is on your side. The fact that this has
Speaker 2: gotten so far off the reservation that they can't ignore
Speaker 2: it speaks volumes to how bad it's gotten. But Menachimes
Speaker 2: Menachims just wants to try to explain it away as
Speaker 2: somehow this is a manipulation through technology. No, how about
Speaker 2: admit that your side took things too far. You don't
Speaker 2: want to do that, so instead, what we're seeing is
Speaker 2: not real? Is your message? Now, maybe maybe she's meaning
Speaker 2: that those downplaying it are using AI to but I
Speaker 2: highly doubt that because, as I said, she is a
Speaker 2: known liberal, and I think she's trying to spin this
Speaker 2: much as we see the Katy Perry's, the Eva Longorias,
Speaker 2: the Wyatt Rustles in fantasyland, trying to pretend that this
Speaker 2: is a peaceful demonstration when maybe it started out peaceful.
Speaker 2: Maybe it started out, but it's definitely not now. And
Speaker 2: if you can't understand the need to have enhanced security
Speaker 2: around this, I just don't understand where you're coming from.
Speaker 2: But again, we know that the left is borderline, well,
Speaker 2: can we even say borderline insane anymore when we're seeing
Speaker 2: what we're seeing out there in the world, or do
Speaker 2: we just have to go ahead and say completely insane
Speaker 2: at this point? I don't know. But again, this is
Speaker 2: the world that we're living in. These are the things
Speaker 2: that we are seeing, and it's insane to witness, folks.
Speaker 2: But the Left is going to continue to try to
Speaker 2: spin this into being a lesser thing and a mostly
Speaker 2: peaceful protest. That's their track record and it shouldn't surprise
Speaker 2: us this point anyway, folks, this is the Right Side
Speaker 2: Radio Program. We're gonna pause right here for a quick break.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. The Midnight Ride, the home of
Speaker 2: the anti establishment movement. This network features great programming such
Speaker 2: as Chris McDaniel's America, God and Country, The right Side
Speaker 2: Radio Show, Paul Revere's Liberty Layer, and many more coming soon.
Speaker 2: So check out the Midnight Ride today. Head to the
Speaker 2: Midnight Ride dot com and check out all the amazing content.
Speaker 2: All right, guys, welcome back here to the Right Side
Speaker 2: Radio program. Moving right along in this show, of course,
Speaker 2: we'll be continuing to keep it close on these protests
Speaker 2: that are going on in Los Angeles and keep a
Speaker 2: close eye on everything that is happening. It's crazy because
Speaker 2: again we understand that this is not a mostly peaceful protest.
Speaker 2: This has turned into a violent uprising that has to
Speaker 2: be stopped. And no matter how much California Governor Gavin
Speaker 2: Newsom wants to scream he has it under control, we've
Speaker 2: seen the proof that he doesn't. Gavin Newsom has continued
Speaker 2: to be a failure. That mayor there in Los Angeles
Speaker 2: is proven to be inept and unable and unprepared to
Speaker 2: deal with the situation. They want this to carry on
Speaker 2: because they view this as a black eye for Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: and that's all they really are concerned with. They're not
Speaker 2: concerned with any of these illegal immigrants. They're not concerned
Speaker 2: with the Mexican community, as they want you to believe. No,
Speaker 2: they are concerned with making sure that Donald Trump looks
Speaker 2: bad and that is their main goal here, and that
Speaker 2: has always been their main goal here. There's a reason
Speaker 2: why they allowed it to escalate to the point. They're
Speaker 2: hoping that when Trump sends in the National Guard, when
Speaker 2: Trump deploys Marines on the ground, that this will be
Speaker 2: something they can utilize to make Trump look like a
Speaker 2: tyrant down the road. That is their entire goal. And
Speaker 2: as I said earlier, I do have heartburn about out
Speaker 2: sending in the National Guard. I truly do, because or
Speaker 2: the Marines for that matter, because again, I want matters
Speaker 2: of the state to be handled within the state. But
Speaker 2: they're not being handled within the state. They're not being
Speaker 2: handled by those state officials the way that it should be.
Speaker 2: They've allowed it to escalate to a point where who
Speaker 2: knows what would happen next if we don't step up
Speaker 2: and do something now to put an end to it.
Speaker 2: We understand that, we know that the left understands that,
Speaker 2: and they know that, but their goal is to exploit
Speaker 2: this because they understand that exploiting it could help make
Speaker 2: them or could help their argument win the day. It's
Speaker 2: that situation, it's that reality that we are currently facing
Speaker 2: in our country, and that's part of the reality that
Speaker 2: we are witnessing here. But that's that's the problem, that's
Speaker 2: part of why we continue to have these battles. And
Speaker 2: we understand that, we understand that the left is more
Speaker 2: interested in making Donald Trump look bad than they are
Speaker 2: in actively doing the right thing. That is way more
Speaker 2: than anything else. They're way more interested in doing anything
Speaker 2: they can to again hurt Donald Trump. Their concern has
Speaker 2: nothing nothing to do with the Mexican people the way
Speaker 2: that they claim that it does. Their concern has everything
Speaker 2: to do with the fact that they are on the
Speaker 2: opposite side of an issue. That's all they care about.
Speaker 2: If they can attack Donald Trump. That's that is one
Speaker 2: hundred percent their goal here, one hundred percent their goal.
Speaker 2: They don't care about anything other than giving Trump a
Speaker 2: black eye in this matter. You and I both understand that.
Speaker 2: The Left, if they're honest with themselves, understand that. But
Speaker 2: they don't want to be honest with themselves because again,
Speaker 2: that does not aid their message, That does not help
Speaker 2: their message of Orange man, bad guy, because that's all
Speaker 2: they know at this point, that is that is the
Speaker 2: entire idea behind their messaging these days. If you go
Speaker 2: on social media and you look at folks who are posting,
Speaker 2: trying to post pro messaging for these illegal immigrants, it's
Speaker 2: all just negative Trump, Trump, Trump. None of them want
Speaker 2: to talk about the actual problem at hand. None of
Speaker 2: them want to talk about the people that have broken
Speaker 2: the law to get here. They want to invoke emotion. Oh,
Speaker 2: they're splitting families they're doing this, They're doing that whatever
Speaker 2: they can get you away from the truth that a
Speaker 2: law was broken. They want to turn a blind eye
Speaker 2: to that. They want to point to this, they want
Speaker 2: to point to that, Well, we excuse this crime, but
Speaker 2: we don't excuse that. Enough is enough. This country has problems,
Speaker 2: and one of our major issues at the moment is
Speaker 2: illegal immigration, and we definitely need to try to figure
Speaker 2: out a way to stop the flow of illegals coming
Speaker 2: into this country. Until we do, I don't know what
Speaker 2: to tell you, because we're going to continue to have
Speaker 2: multiple issues. We're going to continue to have issue after
Speaker 2: issue until we as a society come up with an
Speaker 2: answer to stop this influx of illegal immigrants into our country.
Speaker 2: It's so sad that we're still having this conversation and
Speaker 2: we can't have an honest debate on it because one
Speaker 2: side only wants to be very dishonest with you and
Speaker 2: invoke emotional responses because they can't win the argument. That's
Speaker 2: the that's the sad reality. They can't win the argument,
Speaker 2: and they understand they can't win the argument, so that
Speaker 2: is why they want to continue down this path and
Speaker 2: continue to get your sympathy. They understand that they can't
Speaker 2: win an honest debate on these issues. So since they
Speaker 2: can't win the honest debate on the issues, well let's
Speaker 2: just go down a dark path where where just saying
Speaker 2: that your side is on that side because you hate people,
Speaker 2: you hate an entire group of people. They know that's
Speaker 2: not true. They understand that this is a debate over
Speaker 2: illegal immigration, but they don't want to have that debate
Speaker 2: because again we start to put in logic and reason,
Speaker 2: their position fails. They understand that when logic and reason
Speaker 2: are put into the situation, their side fails. So therefore
Speaker 2: they're not going to have a conversation about logic and reason.
Speaker 2: It's just not going to happen when it comes from
Speaker 2: the modern American left because they can't win those arguments.
Speaker 2: This is moved beyond just having a debate about illegal immigration.
Speaker 2: Now it's turned into a debate over what's the appropriate
Speaker 2: response when the city and state governments are in ept
Speaker 2: to stopping full fledged riots. It's flipped on its head.
Speaker 2: And the reason it's going down that path again is
Speaker 2: because the left doesn't want to have honest conversations. They
Speaker 2: don't want to have honest conversation again, they would rather
Speaker 2: tell you that you're not really seeing what you think
Speaker 2: you're seeing. They would rather tell you that these the
Speaker 2: violence you're seeing is a creation of AI. That's where
Speaker 2: we're at, people, That's the reality that we're continuing to see.
Speaker 2: It's dishonest. We know it's dishonest, but that's where we're
Speaker 2: at when it comes to these debates. They've they've moved
Speaker 2: it beyond an honest dialogue. They've moved it. They've pushed
Speaker 2: it past where we can actually have an honest discussion
Speaker 2: about illegal immigration and how to respond to this, because again,
Speaker 2: they want to politicize it over corrected. Both sides have
Speaker 2: been guilty of that for years. Neither side wanted to
Speaker 2: do what was necessary to actually correct it, or else
Speaker 2: it could have been corrected already. And now that we're
Speaker 2: actively having a response and trying to do something about it,
Speaker 2: the left is all up at arms about it. It's insane,
Speaker 2: but as always, extremely extremely predictable. We're going to pause
Speaker 2: right here for one final commercial break, and we come back.
Speaker 2: We'll switch gears from this illegal immigration topic and get
Speaker 2: into a couple of more topics and ramp this week's
Speaker 2: episode up. This is the Right Side Radio program. We'll
Speaker 2: see you again, what We'll be back here in just
Speaker 2: a few minutes. Hey everyone, this is Jack Fairshawd's the
Speaker 2: Right Side Radio program and license reviewed, and I want
Speaker 2: to talk to you for a second about my pillow.
Speaker 2: My pillow is quite simply the finest pillow on the market.
Speaker 2: My pillows patented interlocking fills adjust to your individual sleep
Speaker 2: needs regardless of sleeping position. This innovative fill then holds
Speaker 2: that position all night, helping you fall asleep faster, stay
Speaker 2: asleep longer. And owner of my Pillow, Mike Lindell personally
Speaker 2: guarantees that my pillow will be the most comfortable pillow
Speaker 2: you'll ever own. And I'll add my own guarantee as well.
Speaker 2: And right now you can get up to eighty percent
Speaker 2: off of all My Pillow products, including bed sheets, slippers, towels,
Speaker 2: down comforters, mattress toppers, even coffee when you go to
Speaker 2: MyPillow dot com and enter the special promo code Midnight
Speaker 2: Ride no space in between Midnight and Ride and remember
Speaker 2: enter the promo code m I D N I G
Speaker 2: H t R ID and save big while getting the
Speaker 2: best night's sleep you've ever had. All right, guys, welcome
Speaker 2: back here to the Right Side Radio show. Here we
Speaker 2: are in the home stretch of the radio show, the
Speaker 2: final segment of the program today. Oh goodness, Simone Biles.
Speaker 2: Of course, everybody knows who Simone Biles is. She's an
Speaker 2: Olympic gold medalist, an Olympic silver medalist. She was an
Speaker 2: American sweetheart for a long time. Remember she quit on
Speaker 2: her team cited mental health problems, and then we were
Speaker 2: all sympathetic because we could understand how mental health could
Speaker 2: maybe get in the way. But of course we now
Speaker 2: see that she is just an idiotic liberal and not
Speaker 2: understanding positions in a position she should truly understand. But
Speaker 2: apparently her arrogance is where it is because she decided
Speaker 2: to attack Riley Gaines, you know, the former collegiate swimmer
Speaker 2: now activist against men in women's sports. She decided to
Speaker 2: attack her on June seventh and told her in a
Speaker 2: I believe it's a now deleted expost, You're truly sick
Speaker 2: all of this campaigning because you lost a race, straight
Speaker 2: up sore loser. You should be uplifting the trans community
Speaker 2: and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive or
Speaker 2: creating a new avenue where trans feel safe in sports. Again,
Speaker 2: I'm blatly missing the point here, calling her a sore
Speaker 2: loser because a man was allowed to compete in her sport,
Speaker 2: something she hasn't had to deal with, something she hasn't
Speaker 2: had to deal with. She goes further with the maybe
Speaker 2: a transgender category in all sports, but instead you bully them.
Speaker 2: One thing for sure is no one in sports is
Speaker 2: safe with you around, So again, that's a ridiculous post.
Speaker 2: I think Riley Gaines would be perfectly okay with them
Speaker 2: creating a trans category for those who want to identify
Speaker 2: to compete against one another, but that's not good enough
Speaker 2: for them that I believe that has been floated as
Speaker 2: a but that's not what they're accepting. And again, maybe
Speaker 2: if she did just a little bit of research on
Speaker 2: the topic before she decides to jump on Twitter and
Speaker 2: pop off like a moron, maybe she'd understand that. Gains,
Speaker 2: of course, was very kind in a response, she said,
Speaker 2: this is so disappointing. My take is the least controversial
Speaker 2: take on the planet. Simon Bowles being a male apologist
Speaker 2: at the expense of young girl's dreams. Didn't have that
Speaker 2: on my bingo card. Maybe she could compel that could
Speaker 2: compete in a pominal horse and rings in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 2: But again, this is a gaines. Of course, is met
Speaker 2: a lot of criticism since the post, one coming from
Speaker 2: a former NFL kicker who's running for Congress in Arizona.
Speaker 2: Jay Feely Philly wrote a response on X to Boole's
Speaker 2: personal attack saying that men don't belong in women's sports. Said,
Speaker 2: Simone bowles argument is the antithesis of Title nine and
Speaker 2: equal opportunity it's provided for women. It put girls in dangerous,
Speaker 2: compromising situations, so a man pretending to be a woman
Speaker 2: can feel better about themselves. So again, that's the uh,
Speaker 2: that's the truth. He went further, he said, Simone didn't
Speaker 2: win any medal, doesn't win any medals if she competes
Speaker 2: against men. Serena Williams doesn't win any tournaments. If she
Speaker 2: competes against men, they are the best to ever do it.
Speaker 2: Why should we compromise with our high school and college
Speaker 2: girls and take away their opportunities? Solid questioning, Solid questioning
Speaker 2: because again it was an idiotic post from some own Bowels.
Speaker 2: Some Bowles probably should have just stayed out of this argument.
Speaker 2: Since obviously she doesn't have a clear understanding of the
Speaker 2: argument in the first place. Some own decision to just
Speaker 2: jump in it is part of the many folks who
Speaker 2: have tried to paint Gains as evil for daring to
Speaker 2: speak out and not just agree with the idiotic position
Speaker 2: that men should be allowed in women's sports just merely
Speaker 2: because they pretend to be a woman. Of course, we
Speaker 2: have since gotten an apology from some own Biles. Riley
Speaker 2: Gaines has of course accepted the apology and considers that
Speaker 2: a big win that she apologized and backtracked. There are
Speaker 2: some that are saying that you shouldn't accept the apology,
Speaker 2: but I'm sorry. I'm from the old school that if
Speaker 2: you want to apologize because Simon Bols, she went on
Speaker 2: put on her Twitter, I wanted to follow up from
Speaker 2: my last tweets. I've always believed competitive equality and inclusion
Speaker 2: are both essential and sports. The current system doesn't adequately
Speaker 2: balance these important principles, which often leads to frustration, heated exchanges,
Speaker 2: and it didn't help for me to get personal with Riley,
Speaker 2: for which I apologize. Gainzig, of course, as I said,
Speaker 2: accepted the apology, but Biles really and truly should change,
Speaker 2: She should study the position. She should have never weighed
Speaker 2: into that argument in the first place without understanding the arguments,
Speaker 2: because that's what she did. She jumped into the middle
Speaker 2: of the argument without understanding it. Her position that there
Speaker 2: should be a segment for the trans community is a
Speaker 2: position that has been floated to them and they have rejected.
Speaker 2: Maybe with a little bit of research someone you could
Speaker 2: maybe have figured that out, seen that and understood why
Speaker 2: that's not the position gains his staking, But she didn't.
Speaker 2: She just wanted to jump into to this argument, harnish
Speaker 2: her own reputation in the process because she was so
Speaker 2: ill informed. But I will give her ready at least
Speaker 2: she's backtracked slightly, and if Gaines, if Riley Gaines has accepted,
Speaker 2: I guess it's worth moving on, but not worth ignoring
Speaker 2: the stupidity that came from her. More news, as we
Speaker 2: get ready to wrap up this program, podcaster Joe Rogan
Speaker 2: has come out on Tuesday and claimed that two unnamed
Speaker 2: former presidents were involved in the protest against his skeptical
Speaker 2: discussions about COVID nineteen Spottish five. Of course, if you recall,
Speaker 2: received backlash in twenty twenty two for allowing Rogan to
Speaker 2: spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. Musician Neil
Speaker 2: Young famously removed his content from Spotify and protest over
Speaker 2: Rogan's rhetoric, saying he no longer wanted to share a
Speaker 2: platform with him. So again, you see this now, he
Speaker 2: Rogan on his show, he talked about it and said,
Speaker 2: and all of a sudden, I hear Neil Young wants
Speaker 2: me removed from Spotify. I was like, what the blank
Speaker 2: is going on? This is crazy? And then he added
Speaker 2: that Spotify got calls from two former presidents, then Biden.
Speaker 2: White House presctery Jen Pisekei commented on the controversy directly
Speaker 2: after Spotify announced it would flag podcasts that cover COVID nineteen.
Speaker 2: Piseki responded, so, this disclaimer, it's a positive step, but
Speaker 2: we want every platform to continue doing more to call
Speaker 2: out misinformation while also uplifting accurate information. Our hope is
Speaker 2: that all major tech platforms, and all major news sources
Speaker 2: for that matter, be responsible and be vigilant to ensure
Speaker 2: the American people have access to accurate information on something
Speaker 2: as significant as COVID nineteen. But Rogan said that instead
Speaker 2: of being censored or deplatformed that he grew by two
Speaker 2: million subscribers in a month. He said people started listening,
Speaker 2: and they started listening like, oh, he's really reasonable and
Speaker 2: pretty humble about all this stuff and just asking questions.
Speaker 2: Rogan also condemned how media outlets attacked his use of
Speaker 2: incremethum to treat his COVID nineteen by referring to it
Speaker 2: as a horse dewarmer. He's like, I'm like, whyren't you
Speaker 2: guys concentrated on the fact that a fifty five year
Speaker 2: old man is fine three days later during the worst strain.
Speaker 2: It was during the delta where everybody's freaking out, this
Speaker 2: one's going to kill us all, and I was fine
Speaker 2: in three days the Rugan described the whole experience as
Speaker 2: a wake up call that opened his eyes about the
Speaker 2: liberal legacy media. He says, it's so dirty. It's such
Speaker 2: a dirty business. God, I used to have massive respect
Speaker 2: for journalists. If I had never done this podcast, I
Speaker 2: would be your regular schmo out there with, you know,
Speaker 2: just spitting out all the company lines and all the
Speaker 2: blasts all over the news. I kind of liked it
Speaker 2: better then, he said, with a laugh, said I didn't
Speaker 2: think the world was filled with demons, money hungry demons
Speaker 2: that are willing to sacrifice human lives in the pursuit
Speaker 2: of revenue. Again, it's very telling because you can guess
Speaker 2: one of the presidents was the then current president, Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: If I had to guess who the other former president was,
Speaker 2: it would be Barack Obama. But I am guessing. But
Speaker 2: based on the statements from Joe Biden's then pres sectory,
Speaker 2: you understand Joe Biden was definitely one of the two
Speaker 2: former presidents that was seeking to censor. Joe Rogan you
Speaker 2: know again, you got Mina comes earlier trying to insinuate
Speaker 2: that AI is creating the images that we are seeing
Speaker 2: of the riots going on in LA, that the riots
Speaker 2: that we're seeing that's not real. We're not truly witnessing that.
Speaker 2: But she's quiet on the fact that two former US presidents,
Speaker 2: possibly the one that was the current US president, we're
Speaker 2: seeking to censor a private citizen's podcast that doesn't concern
Speaker 2: earn them. If this were Donald Trump, they would be
Speaker 2: screaming from a mountaintop. If it were Donald Trump, I'd
Speaker 2: be screaming from the mountaintop. If it's Joe Biden. I'm
Speaker 2: screaming from the mountaintop, Bronco. I don't care. That's not
Speaker 2: the role of a president, a former president or current
Speaker 2: president or whatever. And it's frightening to see that you
Speaker 2: have those within the left that are willing to go
Speaker 2: to those extremes, that are willing to go to those
Speaker 2: links to try to influence public opinion. That's where we are, people,
Speaker 2: and that's the reality of the situation that we now
Speaker 2: find ourselves in. Guys. I want to thank you so
Speaker 2: much for listening. As always, this has been the right
Speaker 2: Side Radio program. New episode of Chris McDaniels America coming
Speaker 2: up real soon. I think we're going to be recording
Speaker 2: it on Sunday. Those episodes, of course, do streamline, so
Speaker 2: I do believe that is the plan. Sunday or Monday.
Speaker 2: Pay attention to our socials. We will give you a
Speaker 2: little bit more information once we know a little bit
Speaker 2: more and the time is locked in. But new episode
Speaker 2: of Chris McDaniel's America could be anywhere from today to
Speaker 2: Sunday to Monday, but we'll let you know for sure.
Speaker 2: We're hoping to get that back to a little bit
Speaker 2: more locked in. Every week time. It's just it's a
Speaker 2: crazy time in Crus's schedule where we just have difficulties
Speaker 2: with that at the moment. But of course the Right
Speaker 2: Side Radio program will be back next week. We'll have
Speaker 2: a morning coffee there in the morning for you to
Speaker 2: check out. Didn't have one yesterday, but we try to
Speaker 2: make those be as consistent as possible. But this has
Speaker 2: been the weekly flagship show, and of course if something
Speaker 2: crazy happens like it did last weekend, we are ready
Speaker 2: willing and able to jump on here and give you
Speaker 2: a breaking news podcasts like we did this week again.
Speaker 2: But I wanted to thank everyone for listening and we'll
Speaker 2: see you again real set.
Speaker 1: Go for the green with stay and play packages at
Speaker 1: the award winning Dancing Rabbit Golf Club. You'll love the
Speaker 1: comfort and convenience of the newly renovated Dancing Rabbit in
Speaker 1: beautiful single or double rooms and suites available. Or bring
Speaker 1: your group and stay at our elegant clubhouse room, golf
Speaker 1: and dine packages starting at one hundred and thirty nine dollars.
Speaker 1: Book today called eight six six four four Pearl or
Speaker 1: online at Pearl Riverresort dot com. It's kay to Pearl
Speaker 1: River Resort.
Speaker 2: Check out the podcast Missing Link Jones County. It is
Speaker 2: a podcast that reveals information gathered by Investigator bad Windom
Speaker 2: of the Jones County Sheriff Department. These cases will be
Speaker 2: discussed or based on Wyndham's own investigations and knowledge of
Speaker 2: each case. So join host Josh Guru Nichols and Jack
Speaker 2: Fairchilds as they discuss these cases bi weekly with investigator Wendom.
Speaker 2: This show is brought to you by the Laurel Leader
Speaker 2: Call and it is on all the major podcatchers such
Speaker 2: as iTunes, I Heart Radio, Spotify, Spreaker, Amazon Music. So
Speaker 2: like and subscribe to the podcast today. The Midnight Ride
Speaker 2: the home of the anti establishment movement. This network features
Speaker 2: great programming such as Chris McDaniels, America, God and Country,
Speaker 2: The Right Side Radio Show, Paul Revere's Liberty Layer, and
Speaker 2: many more coming soon. So check out The Midnight Ride Today.
Speaker 2: Head to the Midnight Ride dot com and check out
Speaker 2: all the amazing content. Hey everyone, this is Jack Fairchild
Speaker 2: So the right Side Radio pro Graham and License Reviewed
Speaker 2: and I want to talk to you for a second
Speaker 2: about my pillow. My pillow is quite simply the finest
Speaker 2: pillow on the market. My pillows patented interlocking fills adjust
Speaker 2: to your individual sleep needs regardless of sleeping position. This
Speaker 2: innovative fill then holds that position all night, helping you
Speaker 2: fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer. The founder and owner
Speaker 2: of Mine Pillow, Mike Lindell, personally guarantees that my pillow
Speaker 2: will be the most comfortable pillow you'll ever own, and
Speaker 2: I'll add my own guarantee as well. And right now
Speaker 2: you can get up to eighty percent off of all
Speaker 2: My Pillow products, including bed sheets, slippers, towels, down comforters,
Speaker 2: mattress toppers, even coffee when you go to MyPillow dot
Speaker 2: com and enter the special promo code Midnight Ride no
Speaker 2: space in between Midnight and Ride and remember enter the
Speaker 2: promo code m I D N I g H t
Speaker 2: R I d E and save big while getting the
Speaker 2: best night's sleep you've ever had.