Speaker 1: Welcome to the three Stories version of the Todd Herman Show.
Story number one Obvious Signs of God only in intelligence
could have created a world story number two where the
Atlantic signal story meets the Crossfire hurricane op oh, and
by the way, the Russia Russia Russia hoax story number three.
Jesus is your counsel and counselor he is not your therapist.
And I know that sounds strange, but there's a reason
I'm pointing that out. We'll talk about this with the
help of Bulwark Capital Management. No, you're risgraator dot com.
And thanks to God Almighty, but Todd.
Speaker 2: Herman's show is one percent disapproved by big pharma technocrats
and tyrants everywhere from the highd Mountains of Free American
here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
are the times which God has decided we shall live.
Really interesting discovery on Mars has caused a lot of
people to say, wow, wow, wow, wow wow. This could
be intelligent life. People at NASA have said, we have
found a sign of intelligent life on NASA apartment on Mars.
So what is the sign? Is it a sign that says, hey,
we're intelligent life, or come on in or free trees
Burgers on Sunday. It's not it's something that I guess
you could look at and go, wait, that's a sign
of intelligent life that is well maybe I mean, it
depends on what we're actually seeing and maybe it's all happenstantial.
But man, they were quick to say signs of life
because there are people who need there to be life
on other planets. They need it for morally therapeutic reasons.
Because if there's life on other planets and it doesn't
say on so in the Bible, then oh gosh, look
that all of a sudden God has just proven so
they needed to be the case. They need space, aliens
and people have human needs. So we'll go through this
and why these people said this is a sign of God.
You'll see a great answer to this. But then we're
going to explore further down into some experiments that looked
to kind of create something that's a bit of a
I don't know, kind of a fun statement, give enough monkeys,
enough keyboards, and eventually of the writer Shakespeare's Sonnet, Well,
folks have tried that. So we'll talk about how that
worked in a second. Now, I believe, and you know
this about me, that I'm a huge proponent of intelligent design,
and I'm a huge proponent that our DNA is in
fact the word now not the word that God is.
The word Jesus is the word. The word is with God,
the word was God. But I think our DNA is
every bit as much the word. It is so obviously designed,
so obviously intelligent. It's the most elegant code ever written.
And it's also code that builds code, and it's hardware
that builds hardware. Far ahead of Elon Musk and his
pipe dream of solving all the world's problem with robot
friends weird and creepy. There are people God is gifted
to use his invention stay of stem cells, to do
remarkable things. A friends at renew Dot Healthcare in Mexico.
They use stem cells that they culture. This is what
makes it illegal in the United States, so they'll take
stem cells from umbilical cords. They reject eighty percent of
the stem cells, eighty percent of the bilical cords because
they want the best stem cells. They're obsessed with safety.
They never want to pass on any form of illness.
A bloodborne pathogen or disease, anything like that. They screen
everybody for cancer. I'm going down again. I know I'm
going to have to create a cancer screening I know
that because they don't want to do anything to harm you.
The stem cells that they culture then allow them to
have the best stem cells in the highest numbers, and
they control all the quality. Right now, I'm going down there.
I'm going to meet a couple. I've talked to them
on video. The woman, the wife is suffering from als.
She just found out they're going to use the stem
cells and they think they can double her life expectancy
from six years to twelve. Because these stem cells destroy inflammation,
that's the first thing they do. They also rebuild tissue.
There's people who are being told you're gonna have to
have a cartilage replacement. That might be the case because
these stem cells can rebuild cartilage and tendon and muscle.
So go check them out at renew dot health Care.
It's r E nu E dot Healthcare. Tell you're part
of the Todd Hermannshaw family. You may not need to
have that surgery or renew r eu E dot Healthcare.
This is a discovery on Mars that had people NASA
types saying intelligent life, intelligent life. I think this is
a pretty good response to this. They found a square.
Speaker 3: Why is everyone talking about the square structure captured on Mars.
People are looking at this square and they're saying, well,
there's obviously aliens had to have visited Mars or been
on Mars at some point because there's a square, and
squares can't just form naturally. So it's an obvious example
of intelligence. Which is really interesting that that is examples
of intelligence. You have these people who are very smart
and they'll look at something like this and they'll say, oh, okay,
this is obvious evidence of design when you know, a
little debatable. But then they'll look at something like DNA
or even something like photosynthesis in a plant, which is
an incredibly complex chemical reaction that sunlight is being turned
into sugar and we don't even understand how it works,
and they're like, oh, yeah, that's just chance processes over
many millions of years.
Speaker 1: And I mentioned Maddy Watson, and.
Speaker 3: It shows romans one of if we're suppressing the truth
and unrighteousness, it's not following the evidence wherever it leads unbiased.
It's a worldview that you interpret all the evidence through,
and that suppresses the creator because ultimately usually comes down
to we don't want to do what God tells us
to do.
Speaker 1: So why would they say at all? By the way,
that's from answers in Genesis, which is a great channel,
great resource. So why would they say that a square
is intelligent design? Because they're right, a perfect square does
not happen in nature. There's things that look square, they
look square ish. But if a square was a sign
of intelligent life, you're telling me that an eyeball is not.
The designs of our bodies speak to an intelligence that
you can read. You can read the intelligence expressed through readable, writeable, repeatable,
testable code that's in our DNA. The fact that we
can read DNA means our brains were set up to
be able to decode it. If a square is a
sign of intelligent design, an eyeball, a body, bodies that
build bodies, code that writes code, hardware that creates hardware
that has to be then a sign of an even
larger intelligence. I'm pretty certain you could teach a monkey
how to make something square alike. I mean, there's some
intelligent primates, so you could teach a gorilla how to
sand something down and to make it square like they've
got appolsable thumbs. Is it going to be perfectly squared?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 1: Are they going to be able to measure it with
a ruler?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: They can then skin in language. Okay, that's great. Can
they formulate a thought write the book?
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: There's this saying forever that people have merchandised. If you
give enough monkeys, enough keyboards, eventually they're going to write
a shakespeareance on it. I always write a book. I'll
tell you about in a chapter in that book, a
professor was given an opportunity to test this theory, and
I'll tell you what happened with him. I researched this.
This comes out of Australia universe. Would die before monkey
with keyboard, writes Shakespeare, steady fines And it took a
study to do this. Australian mathematicians call into question the
infinite monkey theorem and a new research on an old adage.
The paper tested the infinite monkey theorem, a thought experiment
demonstrating that an infinite amount of time can make something
that is incredibly unlikely to become probable by asking what
would happen if generous yet finite limits were placed on
the monkey typists. Their calculations were based on a monkey
spending about thirty years typing one key a second at
a keyboard with thirty keys the letters of the English language,
plus some common punctuation. It found that the time it
would take for a typing monkey to replicate Shakespeare's work
would be longer than the lifespan of a universe. To
broaden out the experiment, the Australian mathematicians turned to chimpanzees,
the closest relative of humans. Not are relatives, but you
can choose to pretend. There are currently about two hundred
thousand chimps on Earth, and the Steady presumed this population
would remain stable until the end of time. Even this
massive monkey work of ours fell very very short. It's
not even like a one in a million. Steady co
author Stephen Woodcock of the University of Technology, Sydney told
New scientists if every atom in the universe was a
universe in itself, it wouldn't happen. And even if many
more chimps who typed out much quicker added to the equation,
still not plausible that monkey labor will ever be a
viable tool for developing written words of anything beyond the trivial.
The authors wrote in the study, a previous trial into
the thought experiment, which gave six sulaxi crested macock monkeys
four weeks with the computer, produced just five pages of text,
primarily filled with the letter S interesting S. I guess
monkeys like S. There was another experiment that actually tried this.
I have a book called God Does Exist. It's a
former atheist who became a Christian by virtue of intelligent design,
and he got to do the experiment. He got to
work with primates. He gave them treats. Every time they
went to the keyboard that was covered in plastic, they
got treats, and every time they went down they were
recording what they typed. I think this experiment went on
for a year. It had a small number of monkeys.
But he wasn't looking for Shakespeare's Sonnet. He was looking
for a word. What was the shortest word or longest
that they wrote? What do you think it was? I mean,
what's the shortest word in the English language? A or
I guess so many times that happened, not once, not once?
I mean there were a's, but they're always back to
back with another letter. There was never a space or
I space. That study led him to go and do
the math about our DNA. If you think Shakespeare's complicated,
and it is, imagine believing that DNA code that writes
code came about through the random mutation. But there's a problem.
As far back as we go with species, we keep
finding this pesky DNA. We have yet to find a
life form that isn't built on language useful, repeatable, noble, testable,
falsifiable language. In other words, the word story number two,
where the Atlantic story meets the crossfire Hurricane op and
the Russia Russia Russia psyop. The ap reminds us if
we'll look back at a shocking moment in the sharing
of US gathered intelligence, utterly shocking. Of course, I'm talking
about Pete Hegsath. Well, no, actually, I'm talking about an
investigation into the unauthorized release of classified documents on Israel's
Iran attack plan, done purposely by an employee who knows
not loyalty the United States of America, but loyal to well,
probably Hamas. Now that was shocking, except it's for in history.
It's way back in history. It was intentional, and it
it's treated as well, just like Pete Hegseth, except Pete
Hegseth of course must resign because if he made the mistake,
and that's questionable if you made the mistake. Because now
you have people who are involved in this conversation saying,
oh wait, wait wait, no one in our group ad
at them, and maybe they're lying. I mean, it would
be an embarrassing mistake to have a so called journalist
observing a conversation about detailed war plans. You know, things
like where the troops are going to be placed, the
weapons they're going to use, the timing, the troop count,
the troop capabilities. Detailed war plans that would be really,
really bad. And that's what we're told by the Atlantic.
Happened that the journalist got in This Jeffrey Goldberg guy
got in and he got to see these detailed war plans.
And Jeffrey Goldberg's a guy who is interesting. He's been
involved in every significant Russia Russia Russia. Trump is a
Russia asset Huax. He's helped to get some of these
things rolling. So how interesting that he was the guy
who got added to this chat. There's been people in
Trump Land saying, look, you don't get it again. This
is once again multi layer chess. This is President Trump
using this guy. It's heg seth using this guy so
that they can show that the United States really is
sick and tired of bailing out Europe. And that was
some of the conversation that did happen. They've admitted the
conversation is genuine. That happened on the signal app. The
Trump administration has said, yep, that was the conversation. The
conversation I've seen is people saying, look, I'm really reluctant
to bail out Europe. They need to start carrying their
own water. But we have to do this. We're the
only ones who can do it well. But the battle plans,
I mean, that's what we were told. So Jeffrey Goldberg went
on to a podcast and decided to discuss these very
serious battle plans. You know, the details of troop commitment,
number of troops, capability, timing of attack, which weapons are
going to use. Are they gonna have a q r
AFF or they have a quick response for us so
they can have battleship backup, drone backup, so he went
into detail about all these detailed war plans that he saw.
Speaker 5: Now, now the Secretary of Defense and the White House
Press Secretary, I said, you're lying. I said there are
no war plans there. I've said there's no classified information.
So the obvious question is, shouldn't you now demonstrate shouldn't
you publish the text?
Speaker 6: No, because they're wrong.
Speaker 1: They're wrong, But how can you prove that you're wrong?
Speaker 2: Maybe?
Speaker 1: Could you?
Speaker 5: Should you provide them to the House and Senate special
committees on intelligence?
Speaker 7: Maybe?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 6: Wow, well, you want to become my lawyer.
Speaker 5: I'm just I'm throwing this out there, Jeff, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I looked.
Speaker 6: I feel like, no, no, no, I mean, obviously, let
me just put it this way. My colleagues and I
and the advice that and the people who are giving
us advice on this have some interesting conversations to have
about this. Yeah, but just because they're irresponsible with material
doesn't mean that I'm going to be irresponsible with this material.
And you know what, I could whatever. I mean, you've
had long history as I have with dealing with them,
and at moments like this when they're under pressure because
they've been caught with their hand in the cookie jar
or whatever. You know, they will just literally say anything
to get out of the moment, to get out of
the jam. And that's okay, I get it. I get
the defensive reaction. And but here's the thing. My obligation
I feel is too to the idea that we take.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think you get it. So you're not going
to give it to the Sentence Overset Committee, to the
Intelligence Committee, even though of course all of them have
proper security clearents. You're not going to give it to
the Democrats and the Committee. President Trump, as much as
you two, you haven't already provided that to them. Maybe
you're going to do the drip drip drip thing. But
maybe Adam shiff should just demand this stuff, demand it
from him. Maybe the Republicans should subpoena him. The Atlantic
has been involved in every significant hoax against President Trump,
the suppressing of information about Hunter Biden, the suppressing of
information about the dementia of Joe Biden. They are an
inside the belt by publication, and you do not get
to have permission to believe that they didn't know that
Joe Biden was severely demented. Yet they wrote articles about
him being the best Biden ever, that he's crisp and
he's sharp, he's a magnificent leader, but the Intel not
being going to share it with the Democrats. Goldberg had
another statement he made and again, this is the guy
who's responsible for merchandising a lot of the hoax as
we see, and I'll play that for you in just
two seconds, complete with the corruption. He's an inside the
Beltway guy. He's an Aceilla corddor guy in New York
City to DC guy, they live in a different universe.
Now we're starting to see them having to wake up
to reality. Department of Education employees facing unemployment for the
first time probably their lives. And I don't wish that
upon human beings. That would be rude, it would be wrong,
it would be unchristian like. But I do like the
fact that they're seeing the world they've created for others.
They're created for a world for us. We're our retirement
right now. You're five or ten, fifteen years from retirement.
It hangs in the balance. If we win back our
fiscal sanity, if we win back to position to being
the dominant energy exporter, if we win back the position
of not wasting our money in massive amounts of fraud.
If we win that back, our retirement accounts changed. If
they win, our retirement accounts change unless they're using the
right retirement advisor. Zach Abraham, chief Investment Officer Both Capital Management,
knows how to make money from volatility. He actively manages
every portfolio which can reduce risk and volatility. And Zach
has been clear eyed and open about the corruption of
our money system forever. Have him take a look at
your retirement portfolio. He'll do it for free, with no
obligation whatsoever. Just go to Know your Risk Radio dot com.
Sign up for a free, no obligation review of your
retirement portfolio with you and your spouse or just you.
If that's the way things are. Go to Know your
Risk Radio dot com. That's Know your Risk Radio dot Com.
Investment Advisory Services Officer, Truck Financial LLC and sec Register
Investment Advisor. Investments involve risk and are not guaranteed. Past
performance doesn't guarantee future results. Truck twenty five, Dash one
three seven. Jeffrey Goldberg, guy who gave us the Atlantic
story about these detailed war plans, the same plans he
hasn't provided to the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee, on
the Armed Services Committee, because he's going to be responsible
with them, because the giving of these two United States
editors who have the proper security clearance is irresponsible. Got it.
He shared some other thoughts.
Speaker 6: Stable here and not disclose the things that I read
and saw.
Speaker 1: I will describe them to you.
Speaker 6: The specific time of a future attack, specific targets.
Speaker 1: This is so carefully worded. He's talking with Jensaki, who's
a deep state operative who had already agreed to an
employment deal with MSNBC while she was still lying for
with the figurehead a specific attack in the future. This
one really interesting, very carefully worded, and he continues Jeffrey
Goldberg with.
Speaker 6: The Atlantic and human targets meant to be killed in
that attack, weapons systems, even even weather reports. You know
that the government is is. I don't know why hexcept
was sharing it with everybody, I mean, the precise detail,
and then a long section on sequencing. This is going
to happen, then that is going to happen, After that happens,
This happens, then that happens, and.
Speaker 1: So this, that and the other thing happened. So just
provide it to the Armed Services Committee. Just give it
to the Democrats. Wouldn't they love to show this maybe
again it's drip, drip drip now of course, to demand
from people like Pete Boudhajeedge that Pete Hegseth stepped down.
Pete Boodhajedge, who had about eight billion dollars to build
charging stations for electric cars, you know, the ones that
serve Satan the teslas, and they didn't build what ten
is de manning a resignation. Hillary Clinton spoke into this
about the sharing of classified information with this guy getting
on a signal app. Mike Davis was involved in these conversations,
and Mike Davis spoke to Fox News and he says,
some tech experts have some work to do, and he
said this to Fox News about some forensic tech to
see how this guy got involved in these conversations.
Speaker 4: We're going to get to the bottom of it.
Speaker 8: We have.
Speaker 4: I just talked to Elon on the way here. We've
got the best technical minds looking at how this happened.
But I can tell you, I can tell you for
one hundred percent, I don't know this guy. I know
him by his horrible reputation, and he really is the
bottom scum of journalists. And I know him in the
sense that he hates the president, but I don't text him.
He went on my phone, and we're going to figure
out how this is.
Speaker 8: So you don't know.
Speaker 1: So if you sell the truth, that should be easy
to figure out. He should offer up his phone. And
maybe it's not Elon Teamed that does this. Maybe Elon
hires this out so we can all figure out how
I got on here. But let me ask you this question.
Do you actually think that the CIA couldn't plant this
guy into these chats? And again, I'm not here to
excuse this. Maybe it was a stupid mistake, and if so,
admit it was a stupid mistake. But the CIA is
more than capable of cracking into a signal discussion and
putting someone into this. It happens that just a day
before this was occurring, for some reason, there was a
discussion of the signal app being proper in the Senate.
They had a debate about this, should people be using
the signal app? That's really interesting timing, isn't it that
just a day ahead of this stuff being discussed and discovered, Hey,
should people be using signal?
Speaker 8: Oh?
Speaker 1: No, it's a horrible app Timing is interesting. Often there's
no coincidences in politics. This also comes right at the
moment that President Trump was declassifying all of the Crossfire
Hurricane stuff. Crossfire Hurricane, of course, was a illegal use
of the Intelligent Services to spy on a presidential campaign.
It was started with a fake bit of research, black
ops research from Hillary Clinton's team run through the disgraced
so called law firm Perkins coup who. By the way,
it seems their lawyers had access to what classified information,
tons of it. And here is President Trump declassifying the
Crossfire Hurricane documents. About the same time as all of
a sudden, a journalist appears on a chat on signal
with Pete hegg Seth and the VP and others.
Speaker 7: Exter, we have a presidential memorandum for your attention. This
memorandum requires the immediate declassification of all FBI files relating
to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. This was obviously one of
the instances of the weaponization of law enforcement powers of
prosecution against you and others. We believe that it's long
pastime for the American people to have a full and
complete understanding of what exactly is in those files, which.
Speaker 1: Gives the media the right to go in and go
and check it.
Speaker 2: You probably won't bother because you're not going to like
what you say.
Speaker 1: They probably won't bother right now, they're not because hey,
look all the oxygen's taken out of the room by
the Pete hegg Seth affair. So the docs commits are
now open. And it was a demonstrable lie to the
FAISA community. It was demonstrable black ops alpo through Hillary.
That was a lie filtered through a law firm that lied.
There are lawyers apparently lied, They lied about the nature
of the billing, etc. And yet when this piece came
out from the Atlantic, the Trump administration accidentally texted me
its war plans. Hillary Clinton responded, You've got to be
kidding me. If this was an accident, then it pales
in comparison to Hillary Clinton making plans to violate Foyer
regulations by having a home brewed unsecured server in her
house and doing things like sending to Anthony Wiener classified
documents he was a known pervert, so that she could
he could show them to his wife. It also pales
in comparison to Hillary Clinton telling people to remove the
classified markings from a document and resending it to her
since she was on an unsecure line. All of those
were national security felonies. But it turns out that the
FBI and DOJ were ordered by Barack Oboma to not
pursue charges against her. Remember that whole thing about the
independence of the judiciary and the DOJ.
Speaker 9: During closed doorge testimony last summer, former FBI lawyer Lisa
Paige said the Obama administration's Justice Department advised the FBI
not to pursue the gross negligent statute for Hillary Clinton
in the mishandling of pacified information. Former US Attorney and
House Republican John Radcliffe led the line of questioning about
the statute, known as eighteen USC. Seven ninety three. Ratcliffe,
you're making it sound like it was the department that
told you you're not going to charge gross negligence because
we're the prosecutors, Paige interrupted, That is correct. Page's testimony
appears to conflict with then FBI Director James Comey's recommendation
in July twenty sixteen against criminal charges for Clinton.
Speaker 10: What I can assure the American people is that this
investigation was done honestly, competently, and independently. No outside influence
of any kind was brought to bear.
Speaker 9: You're interested, Stewart.
Speaker 1: Interesting, Interesting, all the timing beginning to add up. But
I mentioned this thing about the signal app should that
be allowed? This hearing occurred just before we learned about
a journalist supposedly being in a signal discussion. This is
CIA Director John Ratcliffe speaking, so that we're clear.
Speaker 8: One of the first things that happened when I was
confirmed as CIA director was signal was loaded onto my
computer at the CIA, as it is for most CIA officers.
One of the things that I was briefed on very early,
Senator was by the CIA records management folks about the
use of signal as a permissible work use. It is
that is a practice that preceded the current administration to
the Biden ministry.
Speaker 1: How fascinating, isn't it? A Russia hoaxer? A Biden is
solid mentally hoaxer. The Atlantic that's done everything it can
to take President Trump down round one on two is
suddenly involved in a chat And if it's a mistake,
they should just admit it, because it pales in comparison
to the rigging of the American mind through censorship and
through not charging Hillary Clinton the one hundred and forty
to one hundred and fifty sum national security felonies that
she committed. God tells us, not the Lord our power
over others. They should take that advice. Story number three.
There's a phrase that even if you're not a Christian,
you should grow to understand, and the phrase is morally
therapeutic deism or theism morally therapeutic deism. Deism being a
deity moral you get that moral construct therapeutic. We understand
that morally therapeutic deism. The reason I say this is
because people are being given the opportunity to be Christian,
but to not be Christian by turning God into a therapist.
Jesus is our counsel or legal counsel before God Almighty.
He's part of the triune God, had father, Son, Holy Spirit,
and he is our representative. He goes and makes arguments
on her behalf great to have him do that. He's
also the p appreciation for our sins, the payment for
our sins, and to the Holy Spirit. He's our council
lore that is counseling us in the right direction. He
is not our morally therapeutic deity, or explain the difference
here in a second. Because it's vitally important that you
protect yourselves against this and protect your kids against this
who might be getting conned into thinking they're Christian but
they're not. And I'll share an example with you here
in just one moment. It's also vital that you protect
yourself for the next step of the tectocratic medical state.
It is not good news that RFK Junior has nominated
this woman to run the CDC. A woman who loves
a surveillance state, who loves gain a function research, who's
never taken back her enthusiasm for the shots. That's not
good news. This could be something they try again. So
protect yourself. Go to All Familypharmacy dot com slash Herman
get ivermectin hydroxycorquin antibiotics in advance. They'll teach you how
to store these things and know this. This is not
some lead generation company. There's lots of so called health
freedom companies that do this. Some of them are very famous,
but they're usually just drop shippers their lead gen You
pay a markup upon a markup, upon a markup, and
sometimes you have questions about meds. In the case of
All Family Pharmacy, get in touch with them. They're real
human beings with the physical location. Two brothers run the
place and their mother does the books there. It's far different.
Go to All Family Pharmacy dot com slash Herman, use
coupon code Herman ten to save ten percent and get
yourself protected today. All Family Pharmacy dot Com slash Herman
and use coupon code Herman ten. Save ten percent and
be protected morally. Therapeutic deism this is a Christian like
construct that states that God exists, You created us and
ordered the world, and watches over humans and life on
our okay. God wants people to be good, nice, and
fair to each other. As taught in the Bible and
by most religions, the central goal of life is to
be happy and to feel good about oneself. God does
not need to be particularly involved in one's life, except
when God is needed to resolve a problem. People go
to heaven when they die, good people. That's really good
feeling because now you don't have to do anything serious,
like accept some consequences for your actions or reality that
we can't get into heaven without the blood of Jesus meraly.
Therapeutic deism does this. It takes the moral constructs by
which you want to live, and you sprinkle some Jesus
on top, and all of a sudden, it's okay. This
is a guy I regard as a fake pastor making
an argument for polyamory, that is, being in open relationships
with others.
Speaker 11: The Bible is actually full of polygamy. I can point
to you all these various patriarchs throughout the Bible, and
you will see they were multiply married and had various
different relationships.
Speaker 1: Professor and pastor R. K. Wilkinson pointing this out, teaching
the Bible in context, really in context, that's a fascinating
bit of context. Let's let the professor and pastor continue.
Speaker 11: Okay, there have been various Christian communities that have practiced
different poly relationships. This is what kind of shocked me
at first was that when I started doing the research,
I started looking up, you know, Christians and polygamy and
polyamory and stuff like that. Was there are actual Christian
communities who practice complex marriage.
Speaker 1: There are Christian communities to this day who practice slave labor.
There are Christian communities that practice abusing children. There are
instances in the Bible of all forms of the bachery
and violence. And then there's Jesus. One man shall leave
his mother and father and cling to his wife. This
guy's goes on to make a statement, and it's about
right as it gets in the world of the sexual left.
And I can understand this guy's challenge, because I'm sure
he's hit on constantly by women. It's got to be very,
very difficult for the gentleman. But he goes on to
make a statement that because God is love and loving,
he wants us to have all sorts of love of
all sorts of people. But that's not what he says. Morally,
therapeutic deism is taking something you deeply want, let's say,
sexual relations with a whole bunch of different people, and
you sprinkle Jesus on it. You ignore that Jesus was
the fulfillment of the law, that Jesus grew up reading it,
that he preached from it, that he spoke of marriage
as a covenant between two humans. He taught against adultery,
that is sex outside of marriage. He taught against when
you're married, sex with someone not your spouse. He spoke
against fornication, which is sex outside of marriage at all,
and He taught one person to another person become one flesh.
When people turn God into an affirming counselor, you're turning
yourself into God. You're there to pat yourself on the
back and say it's okay. If you want to cheat,
that's how God made you. If you want to steal,
that's how God made you. If you want to go
around on a living people, that's how God made you.
Jesus is our lawyer, our counsel, our counselor through the
Holy Spirit on what's right and what's wrong. He is
not our affirming counselor saying you go be you. This
is the Todd Hermannshaw. Please go be well, be strong,
be kind, and please make every effort to walk in
the light of Christ.
Speaker 7: Yes,