Speaker 1: Oh, bed of that ardor hello, and welcome to the show.
Speaker 2: This is the Cult of Conspiracy and I am the
Speaker 2: Cajun Night and today we have on a very special guest,
Speaker 2: a homie that we have been trying to get on.
Speaker 3: The show for quite some time, but our.
Speaker 2: Schedule didn't align his scheduled did, In Aline, It's been
Speaker 2: coming for a long time. Everybody, welcome Austin Picard from
Speaker 2: the Underclass podcast.
Speaker 3: Brother, what is going on?
Speaker 4: And thank you my friend. It has definitely been far
Speaker 4: too long. We've been trying to make this happen, but
Speaker 4: it was inevitable. Honestly, just after we met at Brogrove,
Speaker 4: it felt kind of like Ki met, you know, the
Speaker 4: vast majority of just dangerous retards in the audience as well.
Speaker 4: It was just like a surreal experience. I did well. Basically,
Speaker 4: it was one of my first at least one of
Speaker 4: the primary episodes that were removed from YouTube almost immediately
Speaker 4: was this the Hitler in the Nazia, Colt episode, my
Speaker 4: Pizza Gate episode, and I think my JFK episode actually
Speaker 4: on the assassination, which I found interesting.
Speaker 3: Two of those will be taken down. The Hitler and
Speaker 3: the Nazia cult.
Speaker 2: There's all kinds of documentaries like not even by like
Speaker 2: fringe YouTubers or conspiracy theorists. Like History Channel has multiple
Speaker 2: documentaries done on the Nazi occultism.
Speaker 5: Well, the History Channel can say anything they want though,
Speaker 5: that's they can pretty much do anything they want when
Speaker 5: it comes to anything that they say on their thing.
Speaker 5: I mean, hell, they talk about Nephlum that I talk
Speaker 5: about all sorts of stuff.
Speaker 6: They've done like twelve different episodes throughout the.
Speaker 5: Years on Stone Hinge. They've done all sorts of stuff
Speaker 5: on the genocides. They've done all sorts of things on
Speaker 5: different parts of Hitler being escaping to South America.
Speaker 6: Like, yeah, they did.
Speaker 5: They did an entire like it was like seventeen hours work.
Speaker 5: They did a whole breakdown of it. They went into
Speaker 5: the camps, they did a whole one on Doctor Evil,
Speaker 5: they did ones on the experiments that they ran.
Speaker 6: Like oh, no History Channel can do anything.
Speaker 3: So but that's my point.
Speaker 2: It was like put good for public access cable television.
Speaker 2: So you would think that these conversations. You said, all right,
Speaker 2: so the Hitler one got taken down. You said, Pizzagate,
Speaker 2: that's going to be of course, the YouTube algorithm is
Speaker 2: going to be unkind to that one, even though it's
Speaker 2: something that we need to talk about and what's confirmed
Speaker 2: with the Epstein files, I understand why the bots would
Speaker 2: take that one with you know, unfavorability of it. The
Speaker 2: jfk assassination too, that's not like a crazy hot take.
Speaker 2: Most people don't agree that that was at what they
Speaker 2: told us.
Speaker 5: Depends on what you said or how you said it
Speaker 5: within the first like I think.
Speaker 6: It's fifteen minutes or twenty minutes.
Speaker 5: Rise de Liberty said, Yeah, it's like a certain amount
Speaker 5: of time that you can't save certain things.
Speaker 6: And if you said killed or murdered or that phrases, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 6: it'll be it's going to be taken.
Speaker 4: Out in the algorithm, I believe at the very least.
Speaker 4: And yeah, but I do think that there's an entire
Speaker 4: I'm very much convinced that there's a level of reality
Speaker 4: where where potentially Hitler could have been operating under mind control.
Speaker 4: And I legitimately do think as far as allegedly he
Speaker 4: was hypnotized at Pacewalk and there's a whole book written
Speaker 4: about it, basically where there was a psychiatrist by the
Speaker 4: name of Edmund Forrester, who this is after Hitler was
Speaker 4: temporarily blinded by a mustard gas attack, right, and he's
Speaker 4: hospitalized in Pacewalk and allegedly if you read Greg Hollett's book,
Speaker 4: and many people push back on him as a reliable source,
Speaker 4: but it's called Hitler was a British agent, and it
Speaker 4: makes allegations that essentially he was actually trained at the
Speaker 4: British Psyopa Warfare Center in Tavistock, and I believe it
Speaker 4: was Ireland. I'll have to actually pull that because it
Speaker 4: was during his time in Vienna when he was actually
Speaker 4: hospitalized and hypnotized, but he basically heard a voice that
Speaker 4: he referred to as Providence, which I found very fascinating
Speaker 4: that there were all these various references and not just
Speaker 4: you know, from one specific source, but many different sources
Speaker 4: that seemingly some of them didn't have any overt reason
Speaker 4: as to why they would manufacture this out of whole
Speaker 4: cloth right as a narrative, But there was this fascinating
Speaker 4: kind of story about Hitler again being hypnotized after this
Speaker 4: moment of being blinded in a mustard gas attack and
Speaker 4: basically his Edmund Forrester concluded that he had a condition
Speaker 4: that was essentially hysterical blindness. But whatever treatment he received
Speaker 4: after as far as under Forrester's care, we will never
Speaker 4: actually know because it won't be publicly available because by
Speaker 4: nineteen thirty three, when the Gestapo essentially invade the area,
Speaker 4: they seize all of the psychiatric records related to his
Speaker 4: treatment and destroyed them. In that very same year, psychiatrist
Speaker 4: doctor Edmund Forrester committed suicide, which again, this conveniently happens
Speaker 4: apparently a few different times, because there was one book
Speaker 4: in which basically and I found this interesting because essentially
Speaker 4: you have this historian who's claiming that Hitler, after his
Speaker 4: time at pays Walk, he left the First World War
Speaker 4: as sort of like this awkward loaner who never commanded
Speaker 4: a single other soldier, even though there's this sort of
Speaker 4: manufactured war hero narrative around him as well. But he
Speaker 4: very quickly becomes this charismatic leader who takes over an
Speaker 4: entire country after being positioned in the Tool society. But
Speaker 4: then there's this interesting parallel because basically there's eyewitness reports
Speaker 4: and these doctors who are appointed with the psychiatrists who
Speaker 4: treated him at Pacewalk, and one of them. I believe
Speaker 4: his name was Ernst twice, and he fled Germany the
Speaker 4: very same year that the Gestapo sees the psychiatic records
Speaker 4: and Edmund Forrester, the psychiatrist, committed suicide. So this individual,
Speaker 4: who is an associate and affiliated with with Forrester Ernst Weiss,
Speaker 4: he allegedly flees Germany that very same year and happens
Speaker 4: to commit suicide in Paris when the Nazis arrived. So
Speaker 4: again this is like a pattern recognition aspect of things.
Speaker 4: But you have an eyewitness report of a German corporal
Speaker 4: named Ah right, So again this is just who knows
Speaker 4: how legitimate and credible this is, but it seems compelling enough.
Speaker 4: And basically Ah was blinded during a Mustard gas attack
Speaker 4: and treated by a psychiatrist a pacewalk, So obviously this
Speaker 4: is just in terms of kind of a curious parallel.
Speaker 4: And so the corporal is described as a patient with
Speaker 4: an Austrian accent, who has received the Iron Cross and
Speaker 4: who loves the music of Wagner but hates The psychiatrist
Speaker 4: hypnotizes Ah and suggests that he must recover his sight
Speaker 4: in order to lead the German people. Perhaps this is
Speaker 4: a quote, perhaps you yourself have the rare power which
Speaker 4: occurs only occasionally in a thousand years, to work a miracle.
Speaker 4: The doctor tells, Ah, Jesus did it, Mohammed the Saints.
Speaker 4: You are young. It would be too bad for you
Speaker 4: to stay blind. You know that Germany needs people who
Speaker 4: have energy and blind self confidence. So there's another book
Speaker 4: that's written by the title The Man Who Invented Hitler.
Speaker 4: And this is fascinating because it basically explains this metamorphosis
Speaker 4: that Hitler evolved and took on in terms of after
Speaker 4: his hypnosis experience. And you have a German author as
Speaker 4: well who significantly spent like almost twenty years researching Hitler's
Speaker 4: youth and all of this. And he claims that his
Speaker 4: name's else Haunt, and he claims that basically he believes
Speaker 4: this was the most significant event in Hitler's early life
Speaker 4: was his time at Payswalk and it goes on to
Speaker 4: explain what drove him to become the man he was
Speaker 4: right and later on in life he was described that
Speaker 4: Hitler himself described his experience at the Payswalk Institute right
Speaker 4: the actual psychiatric institution, and he described it in spiritual
Speaker 4: terms as far as his experience, which again is just fascinating,
Speaker 4: and he identified himself with Jesus Christ directly, and even
Speaker 4: at a Christmas celebration in nineteen twenty six he said,
Speaker 4: quote the work that Christ had begun but had been
Speaker 4: unable to finish, Hitler would complete. He would complete, right.
Speaker 4: So it's just insane to me. You know, the layers,
Speaker 4: the additional layers that you can find, I mean the
Speaker 4: memoirs of Bridget Hitler. She claims that he was destitute
Speaker 4: in Vienna when he showed up at her house, and
Speaker 4: essentially that he was luggageless, and he had these manuals,
Speaker 4: these papers that he would just go over relentlessly at
Speaker 4: late hours in the night, and she said, essentially they've
Speaker 4: been implicated as mind control manuals from the Tavistock Institute
Speaker 4: that he allegedly was was a train that and it's possible.
Speaker 4: I mean, we've done.
Speaker 2: The end of Tavistock. Before we did, I think it
Speaker 2: was like a two or three part series on it,
Speaker 2: and mostly that was to just show how our education
Speaker 2: system was pretty much bastardized by them, the British invasion.
Speaker 2: As far as music is concerned, in the hippie movement
Speaker 2: and the shaking off the yoke of tradition and bringing
Speaker 2: on a new madernal age and all this, and how
Speaker 2: that backfired horribly, But that was all by design by
Speaker 2: the Tavistock Institute.
Speaker 3: I feel like we dropped that probably, I feel like
Speaker 3: less than six months ago.
Speaker 2: But to say that's pause that a young failed art
Speaker 2: student named Adolph, who was Jewish by birth, believe it
Speaker 2: or not, who also made a bee line to destroy
Speaker 2: all mental records of him, also made a bee line
Speaker 2: to his hometown, took over townhall and destroyed all birth
Speaker 2: records so that nobody could show that he had jew
Speaker 2: in him.
Speaker 3: That also ties into this deeply. I'm I don't know.
Speaker 2: It is interesting to see how this guy wasn't like
Speaker 2: the charismatic one of his platoon.
Speaker 3: In World War One by any means. He was, by
Speaker 3: all accounts, pretty much like a nobody.
Speaker 2: Of course, there's going to be a war hero narrative
Speaker 2: that comes around, especially as he goes on and leads
Speaker 2: the Third Reich, and people are going to try to
Speaker 2: show how he's some sort of a war hero from
Speaker 2: his time. And you know, I would say he was
Speaker 2: mid He wasn't like a coward that was hiding in
Speaker 2: his trench. But he also wasn't like doing some wild shit,
Speaker 2: some heroic deeds or anything either by first person accounts anyway.
Speaker 2: But of course a narrative is gonna get spun up
Speaker 2: on that. But yeah, you could see how he goes
Speaker 2: from that kid who tries to go to art school.
Speaker 2: And I've seen his paintings. They're good, Like, you know,
Speaker 2: the man knew how to paint. He wasn't exactly a
Speaker 2: fucking prodigy by any means, right, you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: But and then oh, he was such an a wise
Speaker 2: in person, like you could read mind KANMF like it is.
Speaker 2: There's like I would say, maybe five percent of that
Speaker 2: book is like, okay, that was an intellectual thought that
Speaker 2: this person just said. I hear that, And the rest
Speaker 2: of it is fucking psychobabble ranting that makes no sense.
Speaker 3: It's almost incoherent.
Speaker 2: But then you have these people that act like, see,
Speaker 2: he knew what he was talking about. Usually you read
Speaker 2: mind confidence like yo, I've checked it out, and I
Speaker 2: highly recommend nobody reads. It's the same as a communist manifesto,
Speaker 2: like it's it's a literature by definition, it's not something
Speaker 2: that you should like apply to your life by any means.
Speaker 4: No, but absolutely not anyway, and that I do find
Speaker 4: it just whenever Rudolph Hess was a the Nuremberg trials, right, Basically,
Speaker 4: he gives a statement where he makes a claim that
Speaker 4: the highest levels of leadership during as far as within
Speaker 4: Nazi Germany during World War two were under mind control, right,
Speaker 4: and I just thought they cut his mic as soon
Speaker 4: as he makes this statement, which again is in itself
Speaker 4: almost revealing. But it could also be just an extraordinary
Speaker 4: claim to avoid accountability for your actions after committing extraordinary
Speaker 4: war crimes. I mean, it's possible, but if you pair
Speaker 4: that with you know, obviously Hitler is not only affiliated
Speaker 4: with the Occult in a very overt way. Obviously this
Speaker 4: was integrated within the SS, and the highest levels of
Speaker 4: leadership were even I think it was Himmler himself who
Speaker 4: bestowed these rings upon individuals, which seemed like this occult
Speaker 4: context in itself, because apparently they weren't ever to part
Speaker 4: with the ring unless they died, and even then the
Speaker 4: rings should be returned only to Himmler personally. And I
Speaker 4: thought it instantly. I thought of you know, the Hobbits
Speaker 4: and Lord of the Rings and the Nine Rings of
Speaker 4: Power and the Necromancer are essentially resurrecting the Ring rates
Speaker 4: to come back in search of the Rings. It's just
Speaker 4: like interesting just in terms of the relationship with that
Speaker 4: Tolkien had with World War One. Obviously he sort of
Speaker 4: faceted that narrative and plot after the Trench warfare that
Speaker 4: he experienced at a certain levels. And I do think
Speaker 4: he was affiliated with the occult and certain ideologies that
Speaker 4: he was well aware of, if not practicing.
Speaker 3: I don't think that Tolkien was practicing. I think he
Speaker 3: was very.
Speaker 2: Well read on a lot of these topics for sure.
Speaker 2: I mean you could look at he was even loud
Speaker 2: and proud about the fact that The Lord of the
Speaker 2: Rings has a lot of Christian not symbolism, that's not
Speaker 2: the way I'm looking for, but there was a lot
Speaker 2: lot of Christian narratives that were kind of metaphorically put
Speaker 2: in there in many ways. But when we're looking at
Speaker 2: the day and age that he was writing this, and
Speaker 2: the day and age where these key events in his
Speaker 2: early life led him to become the author that he was,
Speaker 2: we're talking about how you know, occultism and esoteric knowledge
Speaker 2: and these secret schools, the Order of the Golden Dawn, Thelema,
Speaker 2: these types of things that the Oto, all of this
Speaker 2: started to come into the popular Zeitgey's quote unquote around
Speaker 2: that time, and him being a very learned, very educated,
Speaker 2: very well read individual.
Speaker 3: I don't and I could be wrong.
Speaker 2: I don't know for a fact, but I would like
Speaker 2: to believe anyway that Tolkien was probably read in on
Speaker 2: these things, but I don't think he was practicing them themselves.
Speaker 2: But to your point about mind control, the mob is
Speaker 2: very easy to control right the masses, and that's been
Speaker 2: shown so many times. An individual to brainwash a person,
Speaker 2: that takes some doing. It's very possible to do, but
Speaker 2: it takes work. You just need a key event or
Speaker 2: two to take place in their vicinity and they will
Speaker 2: scatter like ants and or attack, and it's there's there's
Speaker 2: some very you know, very specific things that could be done.
Speaker 2: And I think that the Nazi regime was very good
Speaker 2: at controlling the masses, and they used Joseph.
Speaker 5: Joseph was the Minister of what was his name, Minister
Speaker 5: of Public Enlightenment.
Speaker 4: Propaganda, propaganda, Minister of property, and that.
Speaker 5: Was his whole gig is he used psychology to make
Speaker 5: the masses be able to believe he did the primal
Speaker 5: went past the rational and went to the primal fear
Speaker 5: and nationalists beliefs and be able to hone into the
Speaker 5: hive mindset.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and put really pushed that narrative.
Speaker 5: I mean without him, I don't think many people would
Speaker 5: have actually bought into it. But he was so good
Speaker 5: at using that which also couldn't play into mind control
Speaker 5: because technically that's a form of mind control with going
Speaker 5: after the base, you know, your base instincts to be
Speaker 5: able to control the masses and to sway their beliefs.
Speaker 5: So it's when they were apart from each other is
Speaker 5: when people started to have more of their own individual thoughts.
Speaker 5: But that's the thing. They continuously played it on the radio.
Speaker 5: They had like every day, they had pretty much meetings
Speaker 5: where they were all the time, hal Hiler, Hailhiler.
Speaker 4: Like it was.
Speaker 5: Reinforcing this mindset of being a nationalist. And also you
Speaker 5: didn't want to go against it because you saw what
Speaker 5: happened to people that that didn't participate.
Speaker 4: So absolutely, Yeah, And I think just as far as
Speaker 4: like Edward Burnet's and his relationship to you know the
Speaker 4: just in regard to even his his genealogy, later becoming
Speaker 4: the founder of Netflix in reality, and all of this
Speaker 4: just being a direct reference point to the layered and
Speaker 4: entrenched nature of the psychological warfare aspect of just again,
Speaker 4: the deliberate deception that is systematically being i think, strategically
Speaker 4: leveraged against us set at every turn. We have to
Speaker 4: remain skeptical, we have to try and be as objective
Speaker 4: as possible, and I try and separate myself from ideology
Speaker 4: as much as I can as well, because I just
Speaker 4: feel like it's used as a tool and weaponized against
Speaker 4: us in many ways.
Speaker 2: It's hard to whenever you can see how the people
Speaker 2: that are trying to destroy our way of life. And
Speaker 2: I'm not saying this as an American. I'm saying this
Speaker 2: as somebody who tries to live a morally upright life right.
Speaker 2: The opposition to that all happen to be coming at
Speaker 2: it from a very specific vantage point. So it's like,
Speaker 2: as far as ideology goes, and I'm not going on
Speaker 2: a religious soapbox here, but whether that be just basic
Speaker 2: morals and ethics, it's very clear where their line is drawn.
Speaker 2: And it's almost like you're forced to go onto the
Speaker 2: other side of the line. You want to stay as
Speaker 2: a centrist, you want to stay as a non you know,
Speaker 2: partisan as you possibly can. But it's like if all
Speaker 2: of the enemy is stacking up on side of left.
Speaker 3: Over here, I would prefer to.
Speaker 2: Rather be on the side of the right, because these
Speaker 2: people are living happy, healthy lives, and these people are
Speaker 2: bloodsucking children for adrenochrome. It's like, God, it's hard for
Speaker 2: me to say that I'm trying to stay in the center,
Speaker 2: you know what I.
Speaker 4: Mean, absolutely, buddy, And and it's it's a righteous cause
Speaker 4: at the very least to try and remain as centered
Speaker 4: as you possibly can and and insulate yourself from from
Speaker 4: that that just again, I think it's it's very sophisticated
Speaker 4: propaganda that they are able to utilize at this point,
Speaker 4: and it's been structured in a way to where we
Speaker 4: are all very well conditioned inherently in terms of just
Speaker 4: from day one, we're inundated, you know, and oversaturated and
Speaker 4: overwhelmed with this level of conditioning. And also I think
Speaker 4: so many of us are are are desperate. We're in
Speaker 4: the middle of an identity crisis in a real way,
Speaker 4: and more than more than the average person. I would think, uh,
Speaker 4: just seem to not actually entirely reflect on who they
Speaker 4: wanted to become at an early age. They maybe it
Speaker 4: was a lack of self confidence or whatever the case
Speaker 4: may be, playing the game socially in terms of just
Speaker 4: within the the public education environment, which is very much
Speaker 4: a popularity contest, right, and uh, you see how that
Speaker 4: applies to adulthood and and really just modern culture in general.
Speaker 4: I mean, this is what makes the influencer industrial complex
Speaker 4: so so applicable, just in terms of that term and
Speaker 4: and how much it actually does seem to define. Uh,
Speaker 4: these these controlled opposition assets that have been strategically positioned,
Speaker 4: you know, to to essentially run with these false narratives
Speaker 4: to in my opinion, recorre raw the fleeing majority from
Speaker 4: the dying last gasp of the mainstream media, who are
Speaker 4: desperate for an authentic, objective opinion on something are essentially again,
Speaker 4: there's never been more of an appetite for it, so
Speaker 4: they're sort of, you know, fleeing to find this in
Speaker 4: this alternative media and you know kind of networking environment,
Speaker 4: and unfortunately, these controlled opposition assets are raining them back
Speaker 4: in and corralling them back into these well established kind
Speaker 4: of I think they're in reality the concept of allowable
Speaker 4: opinion and establishment narratives that play into the way in
Speaker 4: which they want you to embrace the structured system, which
Speaker 4: again is a false framework, and so you're consistently kind
Speaker 4: of fighting against your own best interest. Again, so this
Speaker 4: is the way in which modern society, uh has essentially
Speaker 4: trapped us to to really just play this this unfortunate
Speaker 4: We're in this unfortunate position where we have to kind
Speaker 4: of uh, you know, at every turn the level of
Speaker 4: of of of kind of like exposure that you have
Speaker 4: to very much dig below the surface and overexpose yourself
Speaker 4: to so many of the details in regard to the
Speaker 4: just again, what is the media cycle? It's it's overwhelming, right,
Speaker 4: just demoralizing in its essence, and I think that's the
Speaker 4: overall point in a way, is to keep you from
Speaker 4: even being willing to engage with it at some sort
Speaker 4: of intellectual capacity to where you can internalize the information
Speaker 4: and apply it to your life and and actually pursue
Speaker 4: individual sovereignty.
Speaker 2: Right, I'm gonna that's just I'm going to be taking
Speaker 2: that that phrase from you for sure. The influencer industrial complex,
Speaker 2: and there's so many ways you could unpack that, to
Speaker 2: be honest with you, because it seems like things go
Speaker 2: and trends these days, right, And I'm not saying that
Speaker 2: like it's it's like super.
Speaker 3: Cool to hate the Jews these days.
Speaker 2: Which fine, whatever whatever aside from that, because that just
Speaker 2: seems to be a hole.
Speaker 3: There's levels on that. But you could even see.
Speaker 2: How certain content creators, whether that's audio, YouTube, whatever, it's
Speaker 2: almost like they all start talking about the same things
Speaker 2: around the same time, even if it's a operation from
Speaker 2: the sixties whatever, they're they're bringing up the mosquito thing,
Speaker 2: and they all just happen to be bringing it up
Speaker 2: within about a month of each other.
Speaker 3: And then the next one will be some wild shit
Speaker 3: that happened in.
Speaker 2: The mid nineties, and they all bring it up around
Speaker 2: the same time of each other, and it's like, Okay,
Speaker 2: is it that all of you are unoriginal and you're
Speaker 2: a piggybacking off of each other, or is it that
Speaker 2: the algorithms are pushing this shit to us to make
Speaker 2: that seem like that's what we really need to talk
Speaker 2: about at this time. Cut to you have the obvious
Speaker 2: controlled opposition, right, the Canice owns the Tucker Carls and
Speaker 2: the Nick Fuint says the oh what's your boy? That
Speaker 2: he's a former kickboxer that thinks that he's like super
Speaker 2: manly but he actually sucks nate something many blonde No,
Speaker 2: the dude in Romania that got in trouble for sex trafficking.
Speaker 4: And.
Speaker 3: I hate that guy.
Speaker 4: I was like, don't say.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, no, no no. Might be many things, but
Speaker 3: controlled opposition is.
Speaker 4: Not that okay.
Speaker 2: But it's almost like you could see how these people
Speaker 2: they like, they play their roles extremely well. Hell, I'll
Speaker 2: even go into the realm of who's the young Turk,
Speaker 2: the bitch boy that everybody thinks is super good but
Speaker 2: he's god.
Speaker 4: Awful actual young Turks? Is that what you're saying, that.
Speaker 3: The young Turk's nephew?
Speaker 4: Oh god, yeah, yeah, yeah, h ship what's his name?
Speaker 3: Chae Gavera? Damn it.
Speaker 4: No, he might as well be.
Speaker 2: He might as fucking well be. But yeah, that guy,
Speaker 2: he's not worth even mentioning.
Speaker 3: But you see what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: So they play their roles to the that's the fucking guy,
Speaker 2: that's the guy that bitch you know, he takes it,
Speaker 2: you know, he takes in the air.
Speaker 3: It's like, okay, fine, I'm not whatever you could be getting.
Speaker 4: He's abusing his little dog and everything.
Speaker 2: Bro, whatever, And the Internet was mad at him for
Speaker 2: a second and then just side stepped it because well,
Speaker 2: you know, no, I don't fucking know. I love my dog.
Speaker 2: I would never do that. But anyway, absolutely not. But
Speaker 2: it's like even on the far right, extremist groups like
Speaker 2: the Nick Fuinteses and the the you know, Andrew Tats
Speaker 2: and Ship, or on the far left like the Young
Speaker 2: Turks and the Hassan Pikers and all these types, even
Speaker 2: though they seem like they're fighting each other, they're just
Speaker 2: playing their role.
Speaker 3: That it's all it is.
Speaker 2: They're being orchestrated to say these things specifically, same with
Speaker 2: Candice so and say all the way through it's a
Speaker 2: it's a oh god, it's a mess. So yeah, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna definitely start using this the Industrial influencer.
Speaker 5: It's trends so like the so like right now, the
Speaker 5: lime disease is the big trend at the moment. The
Speaker 5: you know, artists two is the big trend. The No
Speaker 5: Kings movement is a big trend. The Palestinian conversation is
Speaker 5: still on the you know, there's.
Speaker 3: Like people forgot Palestine existed.
Speaker 5: No, they're they're bringing it back. They're bringing it right back. Yeah,
Speaker 5: they're circle back and right now. So it's it's a
Speaker 5: the trends are going.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 5: You could just see it though if you open up
Speaker 5: your apps, like you'll see it's like regurgitation over and
Speaker 5: over and over again. It's like the new modern version
Speaker 5: of the news across the world.
Speaker 6: It's the influencers are the same thing.
Speaker 3: The mocking bird, but on the social media is now.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 6: But then it's like, okay, well some of them actually
Speaker 6: do have good information, and like they they do, you
Speaker 6: source at least something to give you to go try
Speaker 6: to dig define more information.
Speaker 4: But then that's part I'm sorry, I was just I
Speaker 4: think that's the strategic nature of a limited hangout, right,
Speaker 4: is that you provide this level of information that can
Speaker 4: be coroborated and also kind of fits a narrative in
Speaker 4: a way, but then you misdirect the conclusion into this
Speaker 4: this almost establishment line narrative that that will inevitably lead
Speaker 4: them back into the fold instead of actually going down
Speaker 4: the proper rabbit holes. Proverbiabily, proverbiably speaking, whatever the fuck
Speaker 4: I can't say that for the past week I have
Speaker 4: been able to say. But the point being is that
Speaker 4: obviously their intention is to misdirect you psychologically into the
Speaker 4: wrong conclusion, so you actually won't internalize the proper narrative
Speaker 4: of how this applies to the overall power structure. And
Speaker 4: I think when whenever, like my, my and this, this
Speaker 4: is obviously a kind of like a bird's eye view
Speaker 4: perspective and an oversimplification in a way. But I believe
Speaker 4: the foundation of America and much of all of recorded
Speaker 4: history is very much this cartoonish, naive oversimplification in itself,
Speaker 4: and is sort of like this black cat, white hat
Speaker 4: narrative that many people would like to embrace. Right is
Speaker 4: the reality, But it seems as if, and from everything
Speaker 4: I can tell, even the foundation of America was a
Speaker 4: sort of Rosicrucian mission. The vast majority of the just
Speaker 4: the structure of modern society was very much structured by
Speaker 4: secret fraternal organizations and powerful influence like you know, the
Speaker 4: Pilgrim Society and the Anglo American Establishment or the Society
Speaker 4: of the Cincinnati or or you know, organizations such as this,
Speaker 4: the Committee of three hundred, you know, you can go
Speaker 4: into the montpellerin society. There are so many different sort
Speaker 4: of examples of this that are direct representations of the
Speaker 4: the quote powers that be, the the you know they
Speaker 4: that everyone loves to to reference obviously without being able
Speaker 4: to kind of directly identify who the true power brokers
Speaker 4: are and and then distinguish between the power brokers and
Speaker 4: the political puppets, because I think that is the ultimate
Speaker 4: goal at least it should be for just to kind
Speaker 4: of provide yourself with a foundation to to kind of
Speaker 4: engage with with just not only the media cycle, but
Speaker 4: but if you don't have the ability to even realistically
Speaker 4: understand how the sort of uh power structure has evolved
Speaker 4: and and honestly is is uh, then then you'll never
Speaker 4: be able to identify the root cause of any sort
Speaker 4: of conflict or anything like this. This, this will be
Speaker 4: the collateral damage in terms of your inability again to
Speaker 4: make that sort of delineation for yourself. And and so
Speaker 4: this is kind of the ultimate struggle that we're all facing.
Speaker 4: And the reason I think we each probably started a
Speaker 4: show was just out of desperation, not only to feel
Speaker 4: isolated in our own ideas and very much at least
Speaker 4: that was a huge inspiration for me, was that, Yeah,
Speaker 4: I just felt like an alien, a misfit amongst the
Speaker 4: general public, right, I felt like I couldn't really quite
Speaker 4: even strike up an average conversation with anyone for fear
Speaker 4: of for fear of just you know, insulting their you know,
Speaker 4: delicate sensibility and inability to you know, separate you know,
Speaker 4: and think in this nuanced way, right, utilizing critical thinking
Speaker 4: skills because they were never taught these things. You have
Speaker 4: to sort of, you know, manufacture these skills on your own, right,
Speaker 4: And I think that is the inherent disadvantage we find
Speaker 4: ourselves at in the current construct of the power paradigm,
Speaker 4: because we're not intended to actually be able to hold
Speaker 4: power accountable.
Speaker 2: And yeah, that's definitely as far as why like this
Speaker 2: show was created. It was almost just kind of started
Speaker 2: like a hobby because we love talking about conspiracies. But
Speaker 2: to your point, man, it's very difficult for me to
Speaker 2: have regular conversations with you know, what you might call
Speaker 2: normies because they know that I'm a professional conspiracy theorist,
Speaker 2: and so I'll get asked some off the wall question,
Speaker 2: and it's like, look, I'm down to give you an
Speaker 2: off the wall answer, but like we got kids running around,
Speaker 2: like we're over here at a softball game right now,
Speaker 2: like we're at a family dinner. Like maybe now's not
Speaker 2: the time and place to explain to you what a
Speaker 2: dream or chrome.
Speaker 3: Is, but like, yeah, I can show enough explain it
Speaker 3: to you. What have you heard a frazzle drip? Or
Speaker 3: how how much time he got that?
Speaker 4: Really you know exactly?
Speaker 5: But yeah, I did want to say though, with the
Speaker 5: whole influencer thing, I think the with meta taking over
Speaker 5: and the control of the Internet and being able to
Speaker 5: scrub it is a huge thing. We're just talking about
Speaker 5: it beforehand before we start shooting about this whole thing
Speaker 5: with Walt Disney and him supposedly not being cry and
Speaker 5: it's like, okay, well here's the thing though. They can
Speaker 5: change all of the information on the Internet overnight and
Speaker 5: none of us are going to know unless we're backing
Speaker 5: things up consistently or printing them out and stuff. And
Speaker 5: so that's a big thing too, is they're giving breadcrumbs
Speaker 5: and then if you actually read into what they're saying,
Speaker 5: some influencers, I'm not going to say all, but I've
Speaker 5: found that the ones that are more obscure or little
Speaker 5: they actually do the deep dies and are really trying
Speaker 5: to present real information rather than the main ones that
Speaker 5: seem to be pushing the same narrative on repeat but
Speaker 5: then giving you little clips or random like for using
Speaker 5: Epstein's you know, giving you a foul number. But that
Speaker 5: foul number, if you actually pause on it and go
Speaker 5: look it up, is not a existent. That's really frustrating
Speaker 5: because it's like misinformation on top of it, and then
Speaker 5: you have the media or meta erasing everything and so
Speaker 5: or changing the narrative, and so even when you try
Speaker 5: to find the truth now it's going to be even
Speaker 5: harder for you to find the truth too.
Speaker 6: So that plays all into this whole thing.
Speaker 4: One hundred percent agree. I mean that Orwell's memory hole
Speaker 4: is alive and well right, and I think they've weaponized
Speaker 4: that concept very much as well. Just the digital just
Speaker 4: the ability to again as you mentioned, sort of manipulate
Speaker 4: and almost you know, just in terms of racing history
Speaker 4: and in real time, as far as the online reality
Speaker 4: of even just search results being cultivated through Google, which
Speaker 4: we all know at this point, what's the parent company Alphabet.
Speaker 4: It was financed by the CIA's venture capitalist firm. You know.
Speaker 4: It's just like you Tell and You Tell, and entirely
Speaker 4: coincided with the DARPA project, the Lifelog project, which inevitably
Speaker 4: the very day that Facebook went live, you know, the
Speaker 4: Darper Lifelog project ended. And this is just it's it's
Speaker 4: undeniable at this point that we've been kind of I
Speaker 4: think the digital age was sort of cultivated into these
Speaker 4: digital gulags, very much so in terms of ideology and
Speaker 4: so just in in even the context of kind of
Speaker 4: like and I'm not I don't know Ian Carroll personally
Speaker 4: or anything, but he fits into that category for me.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, bro, I wanted to like him and I don't.
Speaker 2: I don't hate him. I should give that distinction. That
Speaker 2: being said, Bro, he was a big liberal mouthpiece for
Speaker 2: years and years and years. Then woke up one day
Speaker 2: and it's like, wait a minute, Oh do this type
Speaker 2: of content blows the fuck up overnight. He's walking out
Speaker 2: the had bracelet one and I've heard so many.
Speaker 4: Had got the Kabbala brace like the glass Wexner.
Speaker 2: And then he's like, this was actually a gift from
Speaker 2: my girlfriend's father. So it's like, no grown man buys
Speaker 2: another dude bracelets? What the fuck you're talking about?
Speaker 4: Boy? But like whatever most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, And.
Speaker 3: Then he's going on and on and on.
Speaker 2: If you look at his talking points, they are very
Speaker 2: very nick Fuintzi.
Speaker 4: Absolutely yeah, I mean, even to go on Tucker, which
Speaker 4: again another glowing representative of the influencer industrial complex, even
Speaker 4: though you really should just fit under the CIA umbrella
Speaker 4: at this point, Voice of America, anyone, do you know
Speaker 4: who his father was? Anyone?
Speaker 7: Like?
Speaker 4: Why why do people not really just peel below the
Speaker 4: surface level for a brief moment and the world opens
Speaker 4: up and you realize care genealogy matters. Yeah, I know,
Speaker 4: you're absolutely right, And.
Speaker 5: Unfortunately, if it's not them, then they're not going to
Speaker 5: do the research on their own. And I understand a
Speaker 5: lot of people not having time though that's a part
Speaker 5: of the whole construct is running is so ragged to
Speaker 5: where we don't have time to actually want to sit
Speaker 5: or have time to focus on this and then introduce
Speaker 5: electronics and how it's actually destroying our brains and causing
Speaker 5: dementia early on. I mean, the more people in their
Speaker 5: thirties have been diagnosed with dementia than ever before, and
Speaker 5: there's a reason for this. And so add all that
Speaker 5: together and then give make it almost impossible to find
Speaker 5: true information. People are not going to know what to
Speaker 5: listen to, and so they're just listening to whatever their
Speaker 5: algorithm is pushing at them. But which is interesting because
Speaker 5: your algorithm, it takes like weeks to reset your algorithm.
Speaker 6: Once you've mastered it.
Speaker 5: It does not want to change and it does not
Speaker 5: want to show you new ideas or anything like that.
Speaker 5: So I have like multiple accounts that do different things,
Speaker 5: and it's each one of them will show different things.
Speaker 5: I made one to be showing like liberal stuff just
Speaker 5: for the sake of seeing the dichotomy between the two,
Speaker 5: and it's insane. You have the left one just going
Speaker 5: off on a rampage. You have the right one going
Speaker 5: off on a rampage, and it's like, okay, So both
Speaker 5: of these sides are being fed all this propaganda constantly,
Speaker 5: and then on top of all that, they have no
Speaker 5: time to do their own research. They're listening to what
Speaker 5: their friends are saying. They're listening to what is constantly
Speaker 5: being shoved down their throat. From every angle, and.
Speaker 6: Then they're just taking it as truth and then they're.
Speaker 5: Just face value. TikTok told me, so it must be true.
Speaker 5: I'm sorry what Rock told me? So it must be true.
Speaker 5: And it's like, no, let's chat GBT is. People are
Speaker 5: boycotting and chat GBT because they're like they lie to us.
Speaker 6: It's like, well, no, shit, Like it's a program. They
Speaker 6: can program the data into it. It's taking data, and
Speaker 6: then they can control what is being shown.
Speaker 2: To you and start taking the most most used Google
Speaker 2: queries and running that as if it's factual information.
Speaker 3: It's not actually fact checking itself.
Speaker 6: But I highly doubt.
Speaker 5: I want everyone to google something like a conspiracy and
Speaker 5: go to like page one hundred and then see what
Speaker 5: actually is pulling up when you start getting yeah, you
Speaker 5: can't keep like you keep clicking and clicking. I've gotten
Speaker 5: to about like page eighty seven, and then all of
Speaker 5: a sudden, it's like nothing else.
Speaker 3: Yeah, wait what.
Speaker 4: It really is? Yeah it is the memory hole that
Speaker 4: we were just kind of illustrating in a way. But yeah,
Speaker 4: I feel as if there is this level of mind
Speaker 4: control that's been achieved that I think is underacknowledged, right
Speaker 4: and I think that it can. I mean, honestly, you
Speaker 4: can trace this back in a fascinating way. But just
Speaker 4: I went through the Artichoke documents recently and then again
Speaker 4: I actually saw the Daily Mail had sort of this
Speaker 4: viral article for a brief moment in the past couple
Speaker 4: of weeks which directly referenced the Artichoke documents and.
Speaker 2: Talked about yeah, and that became mk ultric correct, Yeah,
Speaker 2: okay mare on the same page.
Speaker 4: Yeah, right, And there were hundreds I think maybe even
Speaker 4: one hundred and fifty nine CIA subprojects for mk Ultra.
Speaker 4: And again that's just in itself, like how much did
Speaker 4: did they order to be destroyed? Essentially when I whenever
Speaker 4: I believe it was, who is the director of the
Speaker 4: CIA at that point, I'm forgetting his name right now,
Speaker 4: but shit, anyway, point being.
Speaker 6: I'm with names.
Speaker 5: So what are the so for those that don't know,
Speaker 5: what are the art Choke files and like what do
Speaker 5: they actually stay inside of them?
Speaker 4: Well, specifically I went through this this document from nineteen
Speaker 4: fifty three, I believe was was the specific document I
Speaker 4: went through because it was and this was all disclosed
Speaker 4: just as basically this this art article was published in
Speaker 4: the New York Times exposing the mk Ultra program, and
Speaker 4: Seymour Hirsch was behind this and responsible for it going public,
Speaker 4: and it's what urged a lot of the committee hearings
Speaker 4: for public transparency and disclosure back as far as just
Speaker 4: in terms of the Church Committee hearings obviously following the
Speaker 4: jfk assassination, but before that you also had these public
Speaker 4: transparency hearings that were in regard to specifically MK Ultra,
Speaker 4: and it was it was very interesting because many of
Speaker 4: the art Choke documents were made public at that point,
Speaker 4: but it was very difficult if you if you can
Speaker 4: imagine just the historical context of being able to even
Speaker 4: sift through this archive of documents, you'd have to physically
Speaker 4: get copies of these documents to even actually reference them
Speaker 4: in any real way if they're not referenced directly in
Speaker 4: real detail in published artic and so this is imagine
Speaker 4: a world in which you had to do that much
Speaker 4: leg work to be exposed to information that would run
Speaker 4: counter to the official narrative in so many different ways. Right,
Speaker 4: But this specific set of documents comes from January of
Speaker 4: nineteen fifty three and it was entitled Outline of Special
Speaker 4: h cases, and I thought instantly hypnotize right, Obviously, hypnotism
Speaker 4: cases is what they're referencing, and especially in context, it's undeniable,
Speaker 4: and basically what it outlines is in all of these cases,
Speaker 4: the subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can pass from
Speaker 4: a fully awake state. So think obviously of free will
Speaker 4: right fully in a free will awake and you know,
Speaker 4: in terms of and control of themselves right psychologically speaking,
Speaker 4: and they can pass from a fully awake state to
Speaker 4: a deep he controlled state via the telephone via some
Speaker 4: very subtle signal that cannot be detected by other persons
Speaker 4: in the room and without the other individual being able
Speaker 4: to note the change. Now, obviously multiple personality disorder, dissociative
Speaker 4: identity disorder or play a key role in I think
Speaker 4: specifically the child sexual abuse is also you know, a
Speaker 4: vital part in terms of the ultimate formula that they
Speaker 4: rely upon and utilize to administer these alters psychologically in
Speaker 4: the victims, because prepubescent victims are apparently more susceptible psychologically
Speaker 4: to this this sort of you know, level of trauma
Speaker 4: basically activating these alternative personalities, you can apparently acquire hundreds
Speaker 4: of alters as a victim, especially a child victim, And
Speaker 4: I found that just it's incomprehensible in a way, right,
Speaker 4: And I'll never forget reading through the Detroll dossier when
Speaker 4: I covered the Mark de Troil case from Belgium. So
Speaker 4: he's a prolific pedophile. And unfortunately, I think that entire
Speaker 4: network was a result of the unholy alliance post World
Speaker 4: War Two between the Vatican, the CIA and essentially organized crime. Right,
Speaker 4: and you have these various factions that are very much
Speaker 4: facilitating this underground network and systematically entrenching it internationally.
Speaker 2: I'ious of a great example of this. Look up Operation
Speaker 2: Gladio and Propaganda Duet. We've done episodes on this before,
Speaker 2: but basically it is a direct connection between Italian mafioso factions,
Speaker 2: the Vatican proper and international propaganda lines. And there was
Speaker 2: murders associated, there was esoteric groups. They basically ran the
Speaker 2: entire government of Italy. Just to your point, there's a
Speaker 2: lot of examples like that. That's just an easy like
Speaker 2: that's a quick Google starch to wait for anybody who's curious.
Speaker 2: But yeah, one.
Speaker 4: Hundred percent, and you know the Nazi rat lines that
Speaker 4: were set up in that very systematic network that you
Speaker 4: reference just now. It's it came up. And that's why
Speaker 4: we were for so often on the shows that I
Speaker 4: do with, especially with Jose, we kind of have defined
Speaker 4: it as modern gladio and the modern strategy and strategy
Speaker 4: of tension at play, and we see it just recycled
Speaker 4: and resurface so very often in its modern form. And
Speaker 4: I view Columbine as a direct result of a domestic
Speaker 4: gladio operation. And I think Wade Michael Page was a
Speaker 4: key operative in the hit teams that went to Columbine
Speaker 4: that day. I think that's why. I mean, you had
Speaker 4: witness reports of a dozen shooters. I mean, it was
Speaker 4: fascinating when you look into the details. So why was
Speaker 4: there shooting still happening inside the school three hours, four
Speaker 4: hours after the shooting began. It's just and by the way,
Speaker 4: the shooters were allegedly dead already while shooting was still
Speaker 4: taking place inside the school. There's so many different anomalies
Speaker 4: within this case. But Wade Michael Page was a key operative. He,
Speaker 4: by the way, went to Fort Bragg as a psychological
Speaker 4: warfare planner, right, was an operative that learned within the
Speaker 4: context of psychological operations at Fort Bragg and then received
Speaker 4: this strange discharge for being drunk on duty allegedly and
Speaker 4: in reality it seemed like some sort of timic based
Speaker 4: sheep type of scenario where this is in nineteen ninety eight.
Speaker 4: He's given this false narrative to allow him to integrate
Speaker 4: himself under a new name. By the way, it was
Speaker 4: Wade Michael Page, wasn't his original name, and he had,
Speaker 4: of course conveniently grown up in Littleton, Colorado, and gone
Speaker 4: to I think it was the I'll have to pull
Speaker 4: my notes here in a moment and I'll tell you
Speaker 4: what high school he had attended, because there were two
Speaker 4: separate high schools he went to in Littleton. I think
Speaker 4: El Paso County was one of them. But anyway, the
Speaker 4: point being, he gets this discharge and he conveniently shows
Speaker 4: up in Littleton just as Columbine occurs, right just before
Speaker 4: Columbine was given the green light. He shows up, and
Speaker 4: he's living two miles away from Eric Harris, two miles
Speaker 4: away from Columbine specifically the high school, and a little
Speaker 4: bit over two miles away from Black Blackjack pizza restaurant
Speaker 4: that Dylan Thiebold and Eric Harris both worked at and
Speaker 4: a lot of members of the Trench Cote mafia apparently
Speaker 4: went to and met and were organizing there. Apparently that's
Speaker 4: where they set off a lot of different fireworks and
Speaker 4: explosive devices, not only fireworks on the rooftop, but explosive
Speaker 4: devices in the bathroom, ice bombs like This is where
Speaker 4: apparently they expressed and explained to even the owner how
Speaker 4: they got all the black powder that they created the
Speaker 4: pipe bombs with was from shutting down a fireworks stand
Speaker 4: and apparently taking all of these fireworks that they were
Speaker 4: gifted for helping them shut down the stand, and then
Speaker 4: going up into the mountains. And Eric was was basically
Speaker 4: you know, pulling the black powder from the fireworks and
Speaker 4: then creating pipe bombs and testing them in the mountains.
Speaker 4: His dad even just so happened to find a pipe
Speaker 4: bomb in his room just before the event goes live
Speaker 4: at Columbine, and instead of reprimanding him and obviously you know,
Speaker 4: just giving him some sort of, yeah, consequence for his actions,
Speaker 4: he takes him up into the mountains and they blow
Speaker 4: it up together. And basically what happened, by the way,
Speaker 4: he has a very strange military background. I believe Eric
Speaker 4: Harris was actually essentially traumatized in a mind control behavioral
Speaker 4: modification research experiment at Plattsburgh Air Force Base, and he
Speaker 4: was even living there with his father after the air
Speaker 4: Force base was actually shut down, right and no one
Speaker 4: from the outside, from the public was even allowed to
Speaker 4: enter the area. It's kind of interesting, but apparently they
Speaker 4: have an eighteen level subterranean bunker system underground under the base,
Speaker 4: and this is where this experimentation was being conducted by psychiatrists,
Speaker 4: and they were even sexually traumatizing the individual victims, which
Speaker 4: were basically just test subjects on the base, and Eric
Speaker 4: Harris allegedly was one of them, and even went on
Speaker 4: record with a friend telling him that he couldn't wait
Speaker 4: to get out of Plattsburgh because he was on Plattsburgh
Speaker 4: little league team, the baseball team as well. There's a whole, uh,
Speaker 4: you know, legitimate record of him being there just before
Speaker 4: he moved a little ten. But anyway, I'm sorry to
Speaker 4: be so off piece. Obviously that's an entire different subject,
Speaker 4: but I.
Speaker 2: Don't think I've ever heard all of this about Columbine before,
Speaker 2: So you've given me a whole rabbit hole to dive
Speaker 2: into now.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, well it's fascinating because there's a there's a
Speaker 4: reference point in terms of Michael Aquino, who I believe
Speaker 4: was the sort of project manager of the Monarch Project,
Speaker 4: which or you know, uh, just trauma based mind control
Speaker 4: is truly what you know, uh, the Monarch Project was.
Speaker 4: And and if you realize that that apparently this comes
Speaker 4: up in the context of Columbine, which is fascinating. And
Speaker 4: as far as Michael Aquino even allegedly being involved with
Speaker 4: something called the Star Chamber of the White Eagle Underground.
Speaker 6: That just that just sounds like wow.
Speaker 4: So this is to me, it's uh and let me
Speaker 4: say it right this time proverbial smoking gun. There we go.
Speaker 4: I actually said it probably okay, So honestly, it was
Speaker 4: this investigative memorandum. It was a confidential investigative memorandum that
Speaker 4: I found on the White Eagle Underground, and it was
Speaker 4: implying that the group itself was actually a cult that
Speaker 4: consisted of high level rogue intelligence agents. And and now
Speaker 4: keep in mind this is coming from the perspective of
Speaker 4: a local investigator who I think is in far over,
Speaker 4: you know, as far as like he's in over his head,
Speaker 4: in my opinion, and he's not quite able to you know,
Speaker 4: identify and acknowledge this this sort of strategic cabal that
Speaker 4: has been domestically uh you know, positioned to carry out
Speaker 4: green light, golt gladio operations. Uh, you know, within the
Speaker 4: EU WES in its modern form. And so this is
Speaker 4: again in ninety eight leading up to nine to eleven, right,
Speaker 4: not just Columbine, but nine to eleven is waiting in
Speaker 4: the wings, right, just about to take place. And and
Speaker 4: so the point being is that I don't believe these
Speaker 4: were high level rogue intelligence agents. I think these were
Speaker 4: intelligence agents that were acting you know in this as
Speaker 4: a part of the role they were supposed to effectively
Speaker 4: pursue and achieve and facilitate, right and basically you know,
Speaker 4: in terms of this domestic operation. And this is something
Speaker 4: that became very obvious to me whenever see I've covered
Speaker 4: many different sex you know, child abuse and sex trafficking
Speaker 4: networks unfortunately over the course of the podcast, and you know,
Speaker 4: from the Finders to Franklin to mc martin, West Point Persidio.
Speaker 4: I mean there's just been mark tu troux obviously, as
Speaker 4: I mentioned, and and it's never ending unfortunately, and so
Speaker 4: it seems as if there has been a a basically
Speaker 4: this very well established pedophile underworld that most people fundamentally
Speaker 4: don't even want to acknowledge, because, my God, imagine the
Speaker 4: implications of this, right, the threat in which we truly face,
Speaker 4: and the you know, the threat that that this network
Speaker 4: poses against society at large, and and you know, the
Speaker 4: vulnerabilities of our children and things of that nature, that
Speaker 4: that if you just think for a brief moment and
Speaker 4: and follow that thought through, Yeah, then it becomes such
Speaker 4: a sinister kind of a concept that that you don't
Speaker 4: want to imagine this, right, let alone face it head
Speaker 4: on with sinister details describing the levels of abuse, these
Speaker 4: these poorness that children endure.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 4: And that's something that I've tried to personally remind myself.
Speaker 4: As much as I want to turn a blind eye
Speaker 4: because of my delicate sensibility, God forbid, I have to
Speaker 4: actually read about what they went through.
Speaker 2: Imagine again, the Epstein files have confirmed that not only
Speaker 2: is this going on, but what we have been saying
Speaker 2: for years that people thought we were crazy about, is
Speaker 2: that the elites of the world are sending their children
Speaker 2: to be traumatized and abuse in these ways at a
Speaker 2: very early age.
Speaker 3: I just had this conversation with a family member. It's
Speaker 3: like there were why.
Speaker 2: I'm like, because MK Ultra taught a few key things that,
Speaker 2: no matter what, are very very true. And sexual trauma
Speaker 2: done to a child at a very early age rewires
Speaker 2: their brain like it actually like fucks up the circuit
Speaker 2: boards and reconnects things in a way that if done
Speaker 2: properly and if rebuilt properly, this becomes the alpha type
Speaker 2: personality that could run the world if that's cultivated and
Speaker 2: done the right way. So these elites are sending their
Speaker 2: children to Epstein Island or to these horrible situations. Look
Speaker 2: at John bon A Ramsey at this point, I am
Speaker 2: completely convinced that Epstein himself is the reason why she's dead,
Speaker 2: to be honest.
Speaker 3: But anyway, it's it's not just lame.
Speaker 4: Maxwell looked very similar to that.
Speaker 3: Yes, profile, Yes, dude, I'm just saying.
Speaker 2: And so it's not just the kids that are being
Speaker 2: abducted and sold into slavery, which is equally that's happening.
Speaker 3: It needs to be stopped, and that's evil. We need
Speaker 3: to talk about it.
Speaker 2: Yes, But then when you find out that like oh no, no, Like,
Speaker 2: for sure, Biden probably sent his daughter off to have
Speaker 2: this done. Trump very possibly may have had his children
Speaker 2: had this done at.
Speaker 3: An early age.
Speaker 2: Everyfer's like what, And I'm like, listen, I'm not saying
Speaker 2: that as a fact. I'm saying there is a pretty
Speaker 2: decent chance that any fortune five hundred company CEO that
Speaker 2: didn't build their company from the ground up, you know
Speaker 2: what I mean, somebody who started off at the ground
Speaker 2: floor and now they're at the top scale. Somebody who
Speaker 2: was born into that wealth at least two generations, probably
Speaker 2: are letting their kids have some horrible shit happen to
Speaker 2: them on purpose. And it's it's an ugly underbelly, but
Speaker 2: it's still that doesn't make it not true exactly.
Speaker 4: And and that's the thing with like the elites being
Speaker 4: willing to sacrifice their own children, that is a concept
Speaker 4: that's difficult for many people to to, you know, sort
Speaker 4: of accept and I understand why because they're obviously this
Speaker 4: is a direct application to their own lifestyle and not
Speaker 4: being able to consider this this not only different way
Speaker 4: of life, but the way in which these people are
Speaker 4: are practicing and exercising this, I think deep level of
Speaker 4: occult ideology that that has been just in a real way,
Speaker 4: it's it's kind of been not only well, it's at
Speaker 4: a level where it's kind of under it's under the
Speaker 4: radar because it's it's not necessarily overtly being practiced, right,
Speaker 4: So obviously you have to provide yourself with the avenue
Speaker 4: of exposure and window into the level of this being
Speaker 4: a reality for you to even consider it, because again,
Speaker 4: it's like they've they've been able to facilitate the cover
Speaker 4: up in a way by associating many of these ideas
Speaker 4: with as as we've mentioned, the influencer industrial complex, the
Speaker 4: mockingbird media has been well in place for for generations,
Speaker 4: and so all they've had to do is trigger that
Speaker 4: individual asset to run out and the shout from the
Speaker 4: rooftops this overwhelming, let's just say, extraordinary, extraordinary narrative that's
Speaker 4: almost unbelievable, and and prove that level of kind of
Speaker 4: it's a way to undermine the credibility of the narrative
Speaker 4: in general by again like this, almost.
Speaker 2: How many whistleblowers come forward just for the media to say, oh,
Speaker 2: Martin Lawrence went crazy today, Oh, oh Richard Pryor went crazy. Day, Oh,
Speaker 2: Dave Chappelle went crazy and went to Africa. It's like,
Speaker 2: and that's just the celebrities scale right, How many of
Speaker 2: these whistleblowers that are actually privy to real information try
Speaker 2: to come forward? Just have every single media outlet doesn't matter,
Speaker 2: Foxy and Inn left right, doesn't fucking matter. All of
Speaker 2: them will start making jokes about it. Saturday Night Live
Speaker 2: will start running a skit about it. Right, it's a
Speaker 2: whole thing. And that's been, like you're saying, for generations,
Speaker 2: that's been in place. So even if you do get
Speaker 2: some Dudley do right type that these kids had this
Speaker 2: going on, one of these kids breaks out and perfect example,
Speaker 2: Corey Feldman. He has been going on and on since
Speaker 2: he was a child about the abuses that happened to
Speaker 2: him as a child in Hollywood and his friends. People
Speaker 2: shit on him for years until now now all of
Speaker 2: a sudden, people are rewatching these interviews that he gave
Speaker 2: and it's like, wait a minute, he's been saying it's
Speaker 2: the whole time.
Speaker 3: It's like, yeah, yeah, y'all thought the whole time. Y'all
Speaker 3: just thought that he.
Speaker 2: Was a little raw because they kicked him out of
Speaker 2: Hollywood no, but that's the narrative exactly exactly.
Speaker 4: And you know what's so fascinating is that there's a
Speaker 4: reference point too. Now. They apparently have programmed individual victims
Speaker 4: through this mind control process, especially the monarch process, specifically
Speaker 4: with these alters that would be triggered just by a
Speaker 4: code phrase, right, even just the code word, that they
Speaker 4: could essentially trigger the individual asset into that alternative personality
Speaker 4: that would then be programmed to discredit them in the
Speaker 4: eyes of the authorities, so they couldn't blow the whistle.
Speaker 4: This was legit a process. And and I have a
Speaker 4: clip I'll actually pull in just a moment of Paul
Speaker 4: Banassi outlining and illustrating this specific thing why he wouldn't
Speaker 4: and the reason why I brought up that artichoke document,
Speaker 4: because they could allegedly trigger an individual from a free
Speaker 4: will state of mind over the telephone with a single phrase.
Speaker 4: All the way back to nineteen fifty three.
Speaker 2: The plot of American ultro boy picks up the cell phone,
Speaker 2: he gets told eight random words. Next thing, you know,
Speaker 2: he breaks out into some sort of a super fucking
Speaker 2: spy thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, And then they even joke about that in the
Speaker 2: Zoolander movieland they brainwashed him to kill the old boy
Speaker 2: from Malaysia.
Speaker 4: As a Menurian candidate.
Speaker 3: And they we all laughed.
Speaker 2: We thought that was a joke, and it's like, oh
Speaker 2: you think, do you think these are yokes up in here?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, no.
Speaker 4: It's it's so insane. I know. When I actually did
Speaker 4: an an interview, an episode with William Ramsay from William
Speaker 4: Ramsey Investigates, I had him on to talk about the
Speaker 4: Manchaean candidate the nineteen sixty three film, right, and it's
Speaker 4: so fascinating. I think Frank Sinatra and Angela Lansbury are
Speaker 4: among the cast. And when you watch it through, it's
Speaker 4: basically you have the main character, right, who's essentially Raymond
Speaker 4: Shaw is his name, right, And basically it outlines the
Speaker 4: Phoenix program.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 4: I think they were in Korea. I believe it was
Speaker 4: not Vietnam. I think it was Korea.
Speaker 2: It was long I wouldn't be able to tell you,
Speaker 2: but yeah, yeah, yeah, and they basically their military unit
Speaker 2: gets you know, taken as war prisoners essentially, and during
Speaker 2: that time they are are taken through this excruciating program
Speaker 2: of mind control basically and essentially they programmed them to
Speaker 2: become manchurians, and one specifically that they want.
Speaker 4: To actually carry out the tar targeted assassination within the
Speaker 4: domestic us after he goes back home. And so basically
Speaker 4: they are given this false story of how they were
Speaker 4: taken in as prisoners and tortured in One of the
Speaker 4: individuals within the unit was unfortunately murdered within that process,
Speaker 4: but he died a hero and never gave any information
Speaker 4: up whatever the case may be. In reality, in their minds,
Speaker 4: they all believed that they were in this hotel lot,
Speaker 4: basically this event center room in a hotel, and it
Speaker 4: was all these old women who were talking about this
Speaker 4: floral presentation that all about these these gardening flowers and
Speaker 4: things of that nature. And so they're all sitting there
Speaker 4: kind of confused, but voluntarily, you know, participating in a
Speaker 4: way and remaining silent. But in reality, it was a
Speaker 4: room filled with military scientists who were conducting this ongoing
Speaker 4: behavioral modification experiment on these American soldiers who were allegedly,
Speaker 4: you know, taken hostage or as warp prisoners at the time.
Speaker 4: But the point being is that throughout the process, you
Speaker 4: see that his mother. So it's like this Oedipus complex
Speaker 4: playing into it all, which is very interesting. His mother's
Speaker 4: the Angela Lansbury character, but she's like this hard woman
Speaker 4: who's like this aristocrat who is very obviously you know,
Speaker 4: the head of this snake that's attempting to administer an
Speaker 4: internal military hunt a fudeta, but through violently targeting an individual,
Speaker 4: the president, for an assassination. Now, the whole plot is
Speaker 4: centered around this kind of Soviet conspiracy, right, which very
Speaker 4: much is layered into modern Gladio and just the Gladio
Speaker 4: operation at large. It was allegedly to combat the Soviet threat,
Speaker 4: when in reality they were just staging. I think they
Speaker 4: were very they were structuring the foundational pillars for the
Speaker 4: international network that they still are very much utilizing to
Speaker 4: this day. And so what I found crazy is that
Speaker 4: they utilize the deck of cards right for one of
Speaker 4: the code symbols that would activate the secondary layer of
Speaker 4: programming in Raymond Shaw. And so he gets back home
Speaker 4: and the first way they trigger him is they call
Speaker 4: him and they give him the first trigger phrase. The
Speaker 4: phrase itself is this Raymond Shaw is. As soon as
Speaker 4: he confirms and says yes, they say you should pass
Speaker 4: the time by playing a little solitaire. Boom, the first
Speaker 4: layer of programming was triggered, and he instantly grabs the
Speaker 4: deck of Solitaire and he starts playing the deck. And
Speaker 4: as soon as he plays the red Queen of Hearts
Speaker 4: I think it was might have been the Queen of Diamonds,
Speaker 4: but I think it was the Queen of Hearts. He
Speaker 4: plays that card and it activates the secondary layer of programming,
Speaker 4: and he's instantly suggestible enough to go through with what
Speaker 4: the physical action of what they had programmed him to
Speaker 4: effectively pursue and go through with. And so that's when
Speaker 4: Frank Sinatra enters the bar after he's triggered, and he
Speaker 4: doesn't even acknowledge him. But when Frank Sinatra comes down,
Speaker 4: sits down and he doesn't even acknowledge him, and Raymond
Speaker 4: just walks out of the bar, and then Frank follows
Speaker 4: him all the way to like this lake, right, and
Speaker 4: he just jumps into this freezing lake in the dead
Speaker 4: of winter, and he wakes up after like the harsh
Speaker 4: weather change, you know, and the temperature change and everything
Speaker 4: else wakes him up from the original programming, and he
Speaker 4: sees Frank Sinatra, like, what are you doing?
Speaker 7: Man?
Speaker 4: As he comes to his rescue, and he had no
Speaker 4: recollection of what he had even done, why he had
Speaker 4: even done it. And later on in the film, they
Speaker 4: actually call him back because it was just before the
Speaker 4: event was supposed to transpire where he would commit the assassination.
Speaker 4: They call him back into the institution where they actually
Speaker 4: have a whole section of a a floor that's isolated
Speaker 4: for this domestic operation, specifically only for the operatives involved,
Speaker 4: so the public couldn't stumble into, you know, how it
Speaker 4: was being This was sort of the covert headquarters. And
Speaker 4: basically what they did is ran a false narrative in
Speaker 4: the paper claiming that Raymond Shaw had actually gotten hit.
Speaker 4: He was hit by a car in an accident, a
Speaker 4: vehicle accident while he was out jogging, and now he
Speaker 4: was in for surgery or whatever at the specific hospital.
Speaker 4: And in reality, this was a cover story for them
Speaker 4: to confirm that the programming because apparently it has a
Speaker 4: shelf life and allegedly, if you do not reinforce the programming,
Speaker 4: then allegedly they can phase out of the programming and
Speaker 4: no longer go through with the operation, and so they
Speaker 4: wanted to reinforce it and make certain that it would
Speaker 4: actually work whenever it was greenlit. So he is given
Speaker 4: the task of going out and committing just this you know,
Speaker 4: murder out of basically with no intent or motive whatsoever,
Speaker 4: just to make for certain he would go through with
Speaker 4: the act, and it also would reinforce his programming along
Speaker 4: the way. And so I just always found that to
Speaker 4: be perfectly you know, applicable to exactly how the operation
Speaker 4: itself and the sophisticated techniques that they utilize. It legitimately
Speaker 4: is Sir Hans Sirhan to a t, right, I mean,
Speaker 4: that's what it is. Where the psychiatrist goes into the
Speaker 4: jail and he takes Sir Han, he puts him in
Speaker 4: a hypnotic trance, right, and Sir Hank goes into the
Speaker 4: hypnotic trance. Actually, I should pull up that story because
Speaker 4: it's fascinating.
Speaker 5: Man.
Speaker 4: It was during my RFK assassination episode where I obviously
Speaker 4: had no choice but to cover the mind control aspect
Speaker 4: of the case involving Sir Han.
Speaker 2: Anybody, man doesn't know if you've heard the name of
Speaker 2: Sir Hans, Sir Han, this is the dude that killed
Speaker 2: r f K RFK Senior and uh allegedly, allegedly, even
Speaker 2: though he has no recollection of his actions.
Speaker 3: He's in jail. I didn't he just get out recently
Speaker 3: or he's about to get out something on.
Speaker 4: The so actually, even r F K. Junior, you know,
Speaker 4: say what you want about him. Obviously he's he's even
Speaker 4: implicated in the Epstein Networks suspicious death of your late
Speaker 4: wife my friend. Yeah, she she stumbles onto his perverted
Speaker 4: sex diary and all of a sudden she's hanging in
Speaker 4: a suspicious suicide. Yeah. Well, anyway, uh, the the the
Speaker 4: fact of the matter is, uh, you know, R F. K.
Speaker 4: Junior believes that a man by the name of Fane
Speaker 4: Eugene Cizar pulled that trigger and murdered his father, and
Speaker 4: I believe him. I think this is a fact now
Speaker 4: at this point. And this was a spook who was
Speaker 4: actually moonlighting as a security guard at the Ambassador Hotel
Speaker 4: that night. And it's not actually sir so Sir Han.
Speaker 2: Patsy, who was possibly mind controlled in order to be
Speaker 2: at the right place, right time to do the things. Yes,
Speaker 2: but he's not the killer in my opinion. Very similar
Speaker 2: to the Charlie Kirks conversation. I don't think Tyler Robinson
Speaker 2: is the actual shooter. I think he was told to
Speaker 2: be at a certain place at a certain time with
Speaker 2: the backpack for sure, but I don't believe that he
Speaker 2: actually pulled the trigger that took out Charlie.
Speaker 4: For with you, Yeah, that's exactly how I feel. And
Speaker 4: and man covering this the specifically, a few of these
Speaker 4: various assassinations in the past provided me with kind of
Speaker 4: that defense mechanism whenever moments like that do do transpire,
Speaker 4: like the Charlie Kirk assassination, and and you see the
Speaker 4: various patsies and the strategically placed operatives that are drawing
Speaker 4: the attention from the public and the crowd and things
Speaker 4: of that nature while the operation goes live. That's that's
Speaker 4: definitely what took place. And I think that with with
Speaker 4: sir Han, it's it's very sad because you know, they
Speaker 4: blamed it on the fact that he was it's so
Speaker 4: funny because I mean not funny, but but obviously the
Speaker 4: way it applies and the modern context as far as
Speaker 4: the propaganda is concerned and in the public perception, uh,
Speaker 4: they said it's because Sir Han was a Palestinian, right
Speaker 4: and he was upset at RFK because he just sent
Speaker 4: some fighter uh jets to to Israel or something and
Speaker 4: and in no way was that actually what took place.
Speaker 4: And and I mean there's even this fascinating connection to
Speaker 4: Henry Loose was a key operative and uh Operation mocking Bird,
Speaker 4: and it was personal friends with Alan Doles even I
Speaker 4: found interesting and and basically tasked with with being a
Speaker 4: key manager, a prominent manager and in the context of
Speaker 4: Operation mocking Bird. And he ran Time magazine for quite
Speaker 4: some time and and it was like a media mogul
Speaker 4: sort of thing. And and he had an article that
Speaker 4: ran now it was in the fifties. I can't recall
Speaker 4: what what date it was specifically, I don't have the
Speaker 4: notes in front of me, but it was it was
Speaker 4: interesting because it basically and this was someone an audience
Speaker 4: member who actually sent this to me at one point
Speaker 4: that showed an entire issue. It was like a skateboarding
Speaker 4: issue of Time magazine, right, and it was it was
Speaker 4: very interesting because there's a picture, a few pictures that
Speaker 4: were taken for this specific you know, article that they
Speaker 4: published in this this uh specific uh uh just I
Speaker 4: forget the magazine which year again that that they published
Speaker 4: it but there was a segment or I mean an
Speaker 4: article that was ran in it that was given the
Speaker 4: headline and got the cover and everything, and it was
Speaker 4: basically on skateboarding in in Times Square, right and also
Speaker 4: in uh what's the uh? Why am I forgetting the
Speaker 4: name of the massive park in New York Park? Yes,
Speaker 4: thank you? And basically this this skateboarding crew, in this
Speaker 4: culture that was forming in Central Park at the time, right.
Speaker 4: And there were two individuals that were pictured as a
Speaker 4: part of this skateboarding group for Time magazine for this issue,
Speaker 4: and it just so happened to be a teenage Sir Hans,
Speaker 4: Sirhan and the individual bus boy who was the first
Speaker 4: person over Rfk's body in the pantry of the Ambassador
Speaker 4: Hotel that night. And keep in mind, this is the
Speaker 4: issue of Time magazine that's published by a key operative
Speaker 4: friends of Alan DoLS in Operation Mockingbird, and Sir Hans featured.
Speaker 2: I can honestly say I've never heard of the thriving
Speaker 2: Palestinian skateboarder community. That's a new one, you know, especially
Speaker 2: we're talking circle what this is the nineteen sixties, yes,
Speaker 2: which skateboarding wasn't even that popular in the United States
Speaker 2: at that time. In reality, that didn't even really come
Speaker 2: around until I mean, we could say like the Dogtown Days,
Speaker 2: right Venice Beach in the seventies, So exactly, the skateboarding
Speaker 2: race to pop off in the sixties in New York.
Speaker 2: It's like, ah, that's that's a that's a take, right,
Speaker 2: that's one of the most has.
Speaker 4: Ever been, one hundred percent. And if I remember, it
Speaker 4: was like it was in the nineteen fifties that the
Speaker 4: issue ran. So it was obviously when Sir Hans was
Speaker 4: a teenager still and he was still a young man.
Speaker 2: Skateboarding definitely was not like a popping off phenomenon in
Speaker 2: the fifties.
Speaker 3: Neither what the fuck were talking about exactly.
Speaker 4: But Sir Hans lawyers right, and to this day they
Speaker 4: still argue the fact that that he was under mind
Speaker 4: control and and a legitimate sophisticated mind control plot whenever
Speaker 4: he carried carried out his actions in the Ambassador Hotel.
Speaker 4: And it's interesting because apparently there was this sort of
Speaker 4: last meeting that took place as far as like this this,
Speaker 4: so if you remember the mencharanean candidate. The book was
Speaker 4: written by Richard Condon and it was adapted to film
Speaker 4: and directed by John Frankenheimer, I believe, and that came
Speaker 4: out excuse me, it came out in like nineteen sixty two,
Speaker 4: just before JFK was assassinated, And obviously the plot of
Speaker 4: that film we just very much illustrated for the audience,
Speaker 4: but centered around a communist plot to kill the president
Speaker 4: of the United States, and.
Speaker 3: That was at that time for sure.
Speaker 4: Obviously, so Frankenheimer himself had originally sought out JFK's approval
Speaker 4: of the film, which is another layer to this. That
Speaker 4: is something that I think most people are unaware of.
Speaker 4: But it was all apparently due to the heightened state
Speaker 4: of political climate at the time in America, right in
Speaker 4: regard to the Soviet Union, and so I guess JFK
Speaker 4: urged him to follow through with the project anyway. And
Speaker 4: so by November sixty three, obviously JFK's been assassinated in Dallas,
Speaker 4: but the film was even pulled out a circulation until
Speaker 4: nineteen eighty seven because I think just the direct reference
Speaker 4: to mind control as a mancharean candidate to potentially I mean,
Speaker 4: it's too spot on, right. You couldn't have that publicly
Speaker 4: circulating in cinema, you know, at least publicly available and
Speaker 4: easy to access at that time for as long as possible,
Speaker 4: So almost twenty five years, they basically tried to cover
Speaker 4: up that film from having a deep impact. But I
Speaker 4: think it was the author, So you know, Peter Lavenda obviously, right,
Speaker 4: author of Sinister Forces, and and he basically there's this
Speaker 4: interesting statement that he made about the fact that Frankenheimer
Speaker 4: around five years after JFK's assassination. It was in sixty eight,
Speaker 4: just before RFK is killed and MLK and Malcolm X right,
Speaker 4: they're basically tying off loose sins for individuals in the
Speaker 4: political environment that they can no longer control and I
Speaker 4: think have too much influence in terms of the the
Speaker 4: level of yeah, just they were. They were very charismatic
Speaker 4: and in phenomenal orders. Obviously they could. They can turn
Speaker 4: a sentence and and spend a phrase and legitimately, uh,
Speaker 4: you know, at the very least relate to a very
Speaker 4: a large audience. And and that's a threat, you know,
Speaker 4: to to the permanent establishment. And so I think the
Speaker 4: fact that RFK was significantly I mean, he was about
Speaker 4: to win the nominee as the Democratic nominee. I mean,
Speaker 4: he just won califn Ffornia, was off to Chicago, was
Speaker 4: about to give his acceptance speech speech at the Ambassador
Speaker 4: and and uh and and that was for the the
Speaker 4: Democratic primary in California. And that's when he got murdered.
Speaker 4: Is just before he's about to take legitimate power in DC.
Speaker 4: And so, I mean, they weren't going to allow that
Speaker 4: to happened.
Speaker 2: After Jeff JFK I think was under the impression.
Speaker 3: That he was untouchable. I think so, especially with you know.
Speaker 2: His upbringing, the Kennedy class of American royalty that he
Speaker 2: came from then to get to the presidency, the youngest
Speaker 2: ever president and all these things.
Speaker 3: And that's why he really didn't give a fuck.
Speaker 2: That's why he had, for example, Marilyn Monroe popping out
Speaker 2: his birthday caking, basically giving him a lap dance in
Speaker 2: front of Jackie OO. It's not that he was being disrespectful.
Speaker 2: He truly thought that he could do no wrong. He
Speaker 2: was untouchable, right, And so yeah, cut to well, yes, honestly,
Speaker 2: and with their upbringing, why would they think any different.
Speaker 2: They lived through the Great Depression without having any knowledge
Speaker 2: that the Great Depression was going on their their status
Speaker 2: of life.
Speaker 4: They made exactly Yeah, bootlegging. Apparently the father was into
Speaker 4: to producing porn, which I was like, whoa early geography. Yeah,
Speaker 4: I mean that's interesting.
Speaker 6: But that's also the whole story about their sister. What
Speaker 6: they did to her.
Speaker 4: Oh my god, she got she got the bottomized men,
Speaker 4: I mean.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and then they left her and then they wentn't
Speaker 5: They weren't allowed to see her too for a long time.
Speaker 5: The boys just pretty much abandoned her. They didn't give
Speaker 5: a fuck.
Speaker 3: I don't even Oh they did, did they?
Speaker 4: Oh they all knew?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, the brothers.
Speaker 6: No, No, everyone knew that she was alive.
Speaker 5: Everybody knew, and they had left her there and then
Speaker 5: a lot of them they tried to go see her
Speaker 5: and stuff, and then I forget one of them. I
Speaker 5: think it's the sister was able to rescue her finally,
Speaker 5: after like eighteen years. I don't I watched the whole
Speaker 5: thing about it, and they broke it all down, and
Speaker 5: it's just it was horrible, to be honest with you,
Speaker 5: and they're like, eh, this is you know, it's happened,
Speaker 5: and it's like, well, fuck you, guys, I'm glad you
Speaker 5: all died, you bitches, Like.
Speaker 4: Right, I did a horrible so yeah, I did an
Speaker 4: episode on eugenics and the depopulation agenda and the transhumanist
Speaker 4: agenda at large.
Speaker 2: And we just knew this last week, dude, Margaret Sanger
Speaker 2: and planned parenthood and how uns and they were talking
Speaker 2: about how we have to get rid of too many people.
Speaker 2: The kindest thing a big family can do is kill
Speaker 2: their infant, because we have too many people on this earth.
Speaker 2: It's like, because for decades they were worried about us
Speaker 2: over populating the earth, now we are looking at a
Speaker 2: population collapse.
Speaker 3: It's like the entire narrative was bullshit start to finish.
Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly. And it's so crazy to you. You look
Speaker 4: into the Jaffe memo based on on planned parenthood and
Speaker 4: obviously being responsible for it, and I think it was
Speaker 4: Frederick Jaffey was his name. He was in charge of
Speaker 4: Planned parents Hood Population Control Division. Yeah, the Planned Parenthood
Speaker 4: Population Control Division. That sounds very transhumanist and and and
Speaker 4: it's a yeah, just at face value, I don't know,
Speaker 4: but butzation helps you know neonatal and it's it's ridiculous
Speaker 4: mm hmm. Yeah, And that's exactly why I felt, like,
Speaker 4: you know, just the level of how they've they've contrived this,
Speaker 4: the sort of I mean, just the ethical implications of
Speaker 4: eugenics alone are truly inconceivable at this point, right like that,
Speaker 4: let alone the moral implications of this, uh, you know,
Speaker 4: being practiced in a real way, and the bendoz.
Speaker 7: So of it.
Speaker 2: I could at least wrap my head around and let
Speaker 2: me explain. So, like, let's say that you understand what
Speaker 2: you're saying. You know, let's say that you are somebody
Speaker 2: who doesn't have some sort of like family heart degeneration,
Speaker 2: right like you, you're somebody who you're you don't have
Speaker 2: diabetes that runs in your family, OBC doesn't run in
Speaker 2: your family, Alcoholism doesn't run in your family, and you
Speaker 2: want to choose a spouse who also comes from a
Speaker 2: line of people that don't have these things because you
Speaker 2: want healthier children. I could, I could at least understand
Speaker 2: wanting to choose out good breeding stock for you and
Speaker 2: your family. And I know that sounds cold and heartless,
Speaker 2: but like, let's be real, the math being.
Speaker 3: I can wrap around, but the way that they're doing.
Speaker 2: It specifically to cut out certain socioeconomic classes, certain races,
Speaker 2: certain people of a certain IQ level and all this
Speaker 2: it's like, you see, now we've lost the plot and
Speaker 2: then look at it to to today's standards. The ones
Speaker 2: with the lower IQs are breeding like fucking rabbits. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: the ones with the higher IQ that should be having
Speaker 2: ten kids to elevate the caliber of the human race
Speaker 2: might have one after they turn thirty five. And it's like,
Speaker 2: this is not the way it's supposed to be going down, man, No.
Speaker 4: Not, it's yeah, and that's that's why. I mean, what
Speaker 4: did Margaret Sanger had a project that was called the
Speaker 4: Negro Project. Yep, that was my favorite project that she had,
Speaker 4: probably just because of the name.
Speaker 2: She was not shy about her beliefs anything. She hated children,
Speaker 2: had her own and then let one of them die
Speaker 2: Like that was we just literally did an episode about
Speaker 2: this something what was last week, Raven or the week before?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean if you look into the I mean
Speaker 5: have you done looking into Obviously you probably looked into
Speaker 5: Epstein and his whole obsession with transhumanism, absolutely, and Bishop
Speaker 5: and the Crisper Program and all that.
Speaker 6: I mean, but there is an.
Speaker 4: It designer babies, right, Genetic modification.
Speaker 5: Though, Yeah, I mean it's all being pushed forward this year.
Speaker 5: So they're going to be changing. The world economic form
Speaker 5: is going to be changing. Their pushing forward with who
Speaker 5: to change, what is actually ethical and what is not.
Speaker 5: So we will see there's three there's three things on
Speaker 5: the docket to be changed, so they could move forward
Speaker 5: with eugenics in a nice, pretty bow. But there is
Speaker 5: interesting conversations. I mean, there is pros and cons to
Speaker 5: certain things that their original Crisper program was creative for.
Speaker 5: So to be able to eliminate, you know, babies that
Speaker 5: are born with their hearts out of their chest, to
Speaker 5: eliminate you know, specific weird diseases, and to be able
Speaker 5: to just take out those those you know.
Speaker 4: The problems. It never ends there, right with the positive
Speaker 4: applications of the of the the technology. You know, it's
Speaker 4: like it they always exploit it to become this sinister
Speaker 4: form of technology that will legitimately be you know. I
Speaker 4: mean again, they are not in no way trying to
Speaker 4: allow us to continually pro create. They're going to legitimately
Speaker 4: attempt some sort of you know, like not necessarily a
Speaker 4: one child policy like in China, but there's it's definitely
Speaker 4: the template you know, and and I think that it's
Speaker 4: a slippery slope. And and the fact of the matter is,
Speaker 4: you know, China is essentially the testing grounds in many ways,
Speaker 4: and Canada fits the bill certainly just and you know,
Speaker 4: just in certain aspects that I definitely is is exploited
Speaker 4: to set the precedent for this will then become uh,
Speaker 4: you know, inevitably it will affect civilian life in the US.
Speaker 4: And and so it's just a matter of time, right,
Speaker 4: And I think the more generations are conditioned to embrace
Speaker 4: these policies that are clearly dystopian in the way they're practiced.
Speaker 4: And and but I'm not at all trying to dismiss
Speaker 4: the the positive value of what the technology provides. Obviously.
Speaker 4: I think it's it's it's, uh, you know, at any
Speaker 4: point if if we can, we can improve the human
Speaker 4: race by allowing you know, just at as far as
Speaker 4: like you would think, that's just sort of an ethical
Speaker 4: obligation too, if you're about to have a child that
Speaker 4: would legitimately not survive, right, some things of that nature.
Speaker 4: And again I'm not trying to draw a firm line
Speaker 4: in the sand for myself personally speaking.
Speaker 3: No, but that's the problem.
Speaker 2: We're talking about the minorities that they like, the exceptions
Speaker 2: to the rule to where this type of technology could
Speaker 2: be a life saving event. But the problem is they're
Speaker 2: going to try to pass legislation to make the exceptions the.
Speaker 3: Rule, and that's that's crazy.
Speaker 2: And honestly, I have a real deep issue with the
Speaker 2: World Health Organization being the ones that are debating the
Speaker 2: morals and ethics of fucking anything. To be completely honest
Speaker 2: with you, as soon as they started saying that a
Speaker 2: biological man with a dick and balls could compete in
Speaker 2: girls sports if his estrogen levels were at a certain point,
Speaker 2: right off the rip whatever you're considering morals and ethical
Speaker 2: right and wrong, and you're complete, you've lost the plot.
Speaker 2: Cut to the COVID conversation, which again they they quickly
Speaker 2: lost the plot, and it's yeah, it's a fucking mess.
Speaker 4: But one man then, and uh, I thought, you know,
Speaker 4: obviously I've taken us off the beaten path quite a bit.
Speaker 4: But the point I was trying to make is I
Speaker 4: might as well reference that that fascinating story of Sir
Speaker 4: Han being mind controlled while he was in jail and
Speaker 4: performing a monkey routine, because again, this is like a.
Speaker 4: This was probably my introduction to to just the notion
Speaker 4: of how how sophisticated these techniques have evolved into. This
Speaker 4: this form of the level of of how much we
Speaker 4: can exercise free will and the concept of free will
Speaker 4: in general like legitimately made me question how much we
Speaker 4: we have real control over our own minds when it
Speaker 4: boils down to it. And in terms of if you
Speaker 4: were targeted as some sort of a valuable asset, you
Speaker 4: fit a profile, whatever the case may be, and they're
Speaker 4: intending on, you know, activating you in some sort of
Speaker 4: domestic operation context, I firmly believe that at a certain
Speaker 4: level it's outside of of our ability to even imagine
Speaker 4: being able to derail that sort of process. And I
Speaker 4: always remember that story of that individual who broke into
Speaker 4: the theme park, the amusement park in Colorado and he
Speaker 4: committed suicide in the bat after he broke into the
Speaker 4: female I think it was the women's restroom or something,
Speaker 4: and he wrote on the mirror that basically he was
Speaker 4: waking up to his programming and he refused to go
Speaker 4: through with it, right that basically the moral implications of
Speaker 4: what he was supposed to engage in, which was basically
Speaker 4: a mass shooting I think at this amusement park to
Speaker 4: kill children he was firmly and ethically opposed to. And
Speaker 4: so he basically was waking up to his programming to
Speaker 4: an extent to where he was aware that he couldn't
Speaker 4: control himself. Because again, this is Tamberlinzer and I have
Speaker 4: in the Boston bombing, who's telling his mother that he
Speaker 4: can't account for all these losses in time leading up
Speaker 4: to the event. He's waking up in strange places going
Speaker 4: how the fuck did I get here? You know, It's
Speaker 4: like there are moments like this that that I think
Speaker 4: provide us with a real, uh, just reference point. And
Speaker 4: again this this sort of introduction at least a kind
Speaker 4: of valuable avenue into into exposing the reality of how
Speaker 4: this kind of functions and the impact and implications of
Speaker 4: when it's directly utilized in this fashion. And when I
Speaker 4: read this that uh, that Artichoke document that I referenced earlier, right,
Speaker 4: not not just the hypnotic programming one, but the one
Speaker 4: that went viral not too long ago, probably a month
Speaker 4: ago or so, when it was essentially referenced even in
Speaker 4: the Daily Mail in the UK, which I thought was
Speaker 4: in and it's talking about brainwashing techniques used on American
Speaker 4: prisoners in the Korean War, which again directly relates to
Speaker 4: the manitarian candidate plot that we were outlining. And it
Speaker 4: talks about these internal CIA memos that suggest that US
Speaker 4: intelligence feared enemy nations had developed ways to control human
Speaker 4: thought and behavior, prompting the agency to explore its own capabilities.
Speaker 4: So in the classified documents, though, you can see directly
Speaker 4: these long range approach that you know, approaches that they
Speaker 4: were attempting to engage in. And basically there's a secret
Speaker 4: program that emphasized long range and long term compounds that
Speaker 4: should be capable of producing a quote agitating effect producing anxiety, nervousness, pension,
Speaker 4: et cetera, or depressing effect creating a feeling of despondency, hopelessness, lethargy,
Speaker 4: et cetera. They also outlined practical considerations for concealment, such
Speaker 4: as substances that could be introduced surreptitiously in food, water,
Speaker 4: Coca cola, beer, liquor cigarettes, highlighting the CIA's focus on
Speaker 4: undetectable methods of influence. So this is all in consultation
Speaker 4: with the Army Chemical Warfare Service and everything that they
Speaker 4: were attempting to manufacture at that time in terms of
Speaker 4: the behavioral modification chemicals that they were utilizing, and these
Speaker 4: these strange chemical compounds that would would basically eliminate free will,
Speaker 4: like let's say the Devil's Breath, right, scopolamine. I mean,
Speaker 4: have you seen that film with Channing Tatum blink twice? Yep, Oh,
Speaker 4: my god, brother, like that that the perfume that they're
Speaker 4: using in that film is. And now, don't get me wrong,
Speaker 4: I think, first of all, I don't think Zoe Kravitz
Speaker 4: wrote anything, no, no, no. Second, I legitimately believed that
Speaker 4: the conclusion of that film, the ending is absolutely terrible
Speaker 4: and obviously is a misdirection for the audience. But I
Speaker 4: thought the value of the concept, uh you know that
Speaker 4: was revealed in the plot was just you know, directly
Speaker 4: almost related to Epstein in a way.
Speaker 2: Right, then we have to look at it in the
Speaker 2: reality of the time and day in place, right So,
Speaker 2: like during the Cold War, especially during that timeframe, you know,
Speaker 2: no idea sounded too fucking crazy. Is if there was
Speaker 2: even the slightest shot that somebody heard from somebody who
Speaker 2: heard from somebody.
Speaker 3: Who they swear was really there.
Speaker 2: I promise that the Russians are the comedies have this
Speaker 2: wild thing going over. They're sending dogs to the moon.
Speaker 2: Stop fucking everything. America needs to send a dog to
Speaker 2: the moon.
Speaker 3: First.
Speaker 2: It didn't matter if there was any actual credible information
Speaker 2: on that or my control or uh, you know, pro
Speaker 2: was it stargate or no, not that. That's not the
Speaker 2: one where they were trying to teach people how to
Speaker 2: be able to like remote view. We just talked about
Speaker 2: it and I forgot yeah Gateway project, right, yeah, yeah, exactly,
Speaker 2: whatever the case was. And then to even further that point,
Speaker 2: if anybody is curious if this is just conspiracy brew haha,
Speaker 2: or if there was some real shit to this, let's
Speaker 2: not negate the fact that in like seventy three, the
Speaker 2: CI brought forward to Congress their heart attack gun, because yeah, exactly,
Speaker 2: they heard from somebody who heard from somebody that the
Speaker 2: Russians probably had this capability, and so they created a
Speaker 2: fucking nineteen eleven that shoots a tiny damn near needle
Speaker 2: sized ice bullet with pufferfish poison inside of it that
Speaker 2: would make the person have a heart attack, and it
Speaker 2: was completely untraceable.
Speaker 3: And people think that that's a joke. You could look
Speaker 3: it up right now.
Speaker 2: They brought this before Congress in front of God and everybody,
Speaker 2: that was on national television. So when we talk about
Speaker 2: the fact that that's real, and then we're talking about
Speaker 2: maybe scopolamine or some other type of instantaneous zombie like
Speaker 2: mind control substance that they were able to lace a
Speaker 2: cigarette with, or a drink with, or food or any
Speaker 2: of the like. Yeah, Honestly, at this time, no idea
Speaker 2: was too crazy for the CIA to throw some funding in,
Speaker 2: some science behind to see what there is to behind
Speaker 2: it exactly.
Speaker 4: And they, by the way, they happened to mention the
Speaker 4: strategic and tactical use of vaccines in that context as well.
Speaker 4: Yes they did.
Speaker 2: And cut for today when Bill Gates is saying, with
Speaker 2: the help of vaccines, we could reduce the world's population
Speaker 2: by ten percent, and the people cheered for this, and
Speaker 2: it's like, I'm sorry, vaccines you claim are life saving,
Speaker 2: And in the same sentence you're saying that we could
Speaker 2: reduce the world's population by ten percent and people are cheering,
Speaker 2: and it's like, I'm not sure if they were cheering
Speaker 2: because they are being polite, or if they actually heard
Speaker 2: what the fuck you just said. But we need to
Speaker 2: have a different kind of conversation at this time, exactly.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 4: So at the very least, I want to finally get
Speaker 4: to that clip that I wanted to show you guys,
Speaker 4: because I do think it's it's absolutely you know, the
Speaker 4: way that we can tie it into everything we've been
Speaker 4: discussing is just, you know, it's it's obviously poignant and
Speaker 4: relevant and and many people I think are just again
Speaker 4: not familiar and very much unaware of the reality and
Speaker 4: how much they've been able to accomplish in terms of
Speaker 4: these mind control operations and especially trauma based mind control.
Speaker 4: And I really do think that the you know, the
Speaker 4: Monarch program and Project Monarch was was and still is
Speaker 4: to this day, a very critical and viable just sort
Speaker 4: of technique. And how they not only do you do
Speaker 4: you have to imagine this sort of avenue of procuring
Speaker 4: children being like un documented children. And by the way,
Speaker 4: I found that so interesting. Whenever Matt Gates did come
Speaker 4: out talking about the NEPHLUM the other day and the
Speaker 4: alien breeding hybrid programs, he references essentially the fact that
Speaker 4: illegal migrant caravans are being exploited and that the illegal
Speaker 4: migrants were being victimized in these alien hybrid breeding programs, right,
Speaker 4: And just the concept of that was was, you know,
Speaker 4: it's a little cartoonish as much as it's terrible if
Speaker 4: that's actually the case. But obviously I'm just thinking about
Speaker 4: how past the pale we truly are in this kind
Speaker 4: of clown pilled version of reality that we're facing where
Speaker 4: the political puppets are so unimpressive. I mean, it's just
Speaker 4: that face value. You have to you have to just
Speaker 4: stop and pause and for a moment ask yourself, where
Speaker 4: am I? You know, It's like what world am I
Speaker 4: living in at this point where where these individuals are
Speaker 4: allegedly public representatives and are using language like this.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 4: But anyway, when it boils down to it, I feel like,
Speaker 4: since we were discussing Sir Han, it is it is
Speaker 4: directly applicable to that of the mind control operations that
Speaker 4: they have, you know, utilized for generations. And as far
Speaker 4: as some of these again I had mentioned undocumented children
Speaker 4: being exploited in these in these kind of networks, but
Speaker 4: you also have, as we have mentioned, the parental aspect
Speaker 4: of kind of being willing to sacrifice your own children.
Speaker 4: And I do think that that very much happens as
Speaker 4: far as like even Eric Harris was a great reference
Speaker 4: to Plattsburgh Air Force Base and his father, but James Holmes,
Speaker 4: I mean his his father, right, Robert Holmes, and then
Speaker 4: Adam Lanza, his father, Peter Lanza. So they were both
Speaker 4: set to testify in the LIBAR scandal, right, which was
Speaker 4: the lunder London International Bank and Finance rate. I can't
Speaker 4: remember now the liboard but what it stands for. But
Speaker 4: the point being is that this is how you basically
Speaker 4: rig international interest rates, right for which is how banks
Speaker 4: effectively are are able to you know, file for loans
Speaker 4: and things of that nature. And it's it's very interesting.
Speaker 4: But the point being is that they were set to
Speaker 4: testify the very year. Actually it was just after the Aurora,
Speaker 4: Colorado cinema shooting and just after honestly the Sandy Hook
Speaker 4: Elementary School mass shooting that took place. All of a sudden, Adam,
Speaker 4: you know, Adam or Peter Lanza and Robert Holmes no
Speaker 4: longer testify in this ongoing court case involving international finance
Speaker 4: that we're talking just the level of money that was
Speaker 4: essentially laundered through that operation. I mean, they legitimately had
Speaker 4: to change the system, the financial economic system, from Libor
Speaker 4: to SOFER. I believe so SOFR is the new standard, right,
Speaker 4: And I mean it's just the fact of the matter is,
Speaker 4: if you have two fathers set to testify in a major,
Speaker 4: major international court case that has implications that will brock
Speaker 4: the international finance world at large, and both their children
Speaker 4: are activated in a modern Gladio domestic operation where they
Speaker 4: find themselves basically sacrificed at the end and no longer
Speaker 4: are the fathers set to testify, and they go missing,
Speaker 4: basically kind of disappear off the face of the earth.
Speaker 4: I find that all very interesting, right, And I think
Speaker 4: that too much of this applies to so many of
Speaker 4: these high impact events that we've kind of made reference to.
Speaker 4: But man, when I mentioned Sir Han the fact that
Speaker 4: he allegedly what endure this form of programming known as
Speaker 4: psychic driving, I was introduced to this concept. It was
Speaker 4: one of my I think maybe even my very first
Speaker 4: episode that I ever did. When I found doctor Ewen
Speaker 4: Cameron obviously, who was responsible for the Montreal experiments, which
Speaker 4: was really just the CIA. Basically they essentially kind of
Speaker 4: like provided themselves with plausible deniability for running mk ultra
Speaker 4: operations in Canada, and so they outsourced mk Ultra to
Speaker 4: Canada through the Montreal experiments, and so that's essentially what
Speaker 4: took place. And doctor Ewen Cameron was a key individual
Speaker 4: of prominence who helped facilitate and basically ran the Montreal experiments.
Speaker 4: So sir Han basically and according to Lawrence Teeter, who
Speaker 4: was his defense attorney, he claims and still believes that
Speaker 4: sir Han was operating under a sophisticated version of mind
Speaker 4: control techniques from mk Ultra when he fired blanks at
Speaker 4: RFK in the pantry, which Lisa Peace wrote a lie
Speaker 4: Too Big to Fail, I believe, is her her book
Speaker 4: on the RFK assassination. And she's really a you know,
Speaker 4: she's a little bit more of a leftist politically speaking
Speaker 4: in terms of ideology, but she she means well, I
Speaker 4: think she's just a very anti war person and classical
Speaker 4: liberal kind of comes from that generation, you know, and
Speaker 4: it never really grew past that ideological prison that you
Speaker 4: find yourself in in a way, and so she she
Speaker 4: still associates many things through that that kind of it's
Speaker 4: a bipartisan perspective because it's the delusion man manufactured. But yeah,
Speaker 4: so it's unfortunate. But she she's very valuable resource in
Speaker 4: certain aspects, and that book is phenomenal on the RFK assassination.
Speaker 4: And she believes, and I agree with her that RFK
Speaker 4: or I mean that Sir Han was firing blanks in
Speaker 4: the pantry whenever RFK was shot at point blank range
Speaker 4: in the back by than Eugenius Czar and that's why
Speaker 4: RFK fell on him. Yes, yeah, it's very interesting.
Speaker 2: But even up until recently, right like mk ultra, we
Speaker 2: as conspiracy people, right as in the truth or movement,
Speaker 2: we understand the levels of truth that are associated with this.
Speaker 2: The vast majority of American citizens might have heard of
Speaker 2: mk ultra.
Speaker 3: Maybe they believe some of it's real.
Speaker 2: Maybe they think that, yeah, the CIA probably did something
Speaker 2: to some people, but like that was way back, and
Speaker 2: like a lot of people aren't fully aware of the
Speaker 2: levels and the depths that are associated with mk ultra.
Speaker 2: And then to say that, oh, yeah, my client who
Speaker 2: is in jail for this crime was a victim and
Speaker 2: they've been saying this for years. By the way, it's
Speaker 2: in like a new revelation. They've been on this bandwagon
Speaker 2: for a while. As far as Sir Ham being an
Speaker 2: mk ultra victim, we can understand why the public and
Speaker 2: why the courts heard this and said, yeah, right, okay,
Speaker 2: he was taken by a three letter agency and brainwashed
Speaker 2: to be a killer. Sure, But like now we look
Speaker 2: at it and it's like, okay, actually, there's a lot
Speaker 2: more things that line up as far as that's concerned.
Speaker 2: But I mean, that's only recently where that really started
Speaker 2: to become a normal conversation for people to start questioning, you.
Speaker 4: Know, absolutely, And I do think that you imagine in
Speaker 4: nineteen sixty eight when this all takes place.
Speaker 2: A year before we allegedly put a man on the moon,
Speaker 2: like just we're all clear, allegedly Vietnam's going ham all
Speaker 2: of this, and it's like the people were not ready
Speaker 2: to hear that the CIA is brainwashing mental patients, you
Speaker 2: know what I mean, and just dropping the massive amount
Speaker 2: of lsds to five year olds just to see what
Speaker 2: the fuck would happen. Like, that's not a comfortable conversation
Speaker 2: that people wanted to hear about, not at all.
Speaker 4: And it makes all the sense in the world that
Speaker 4: it would be impossible for a majority to be willing
Speaker 4: enough to and open minded enough to accept this or
Speaker 4: even consider it as a reality. But yeah, hindsight's twenty twenty,
Speaker 4: as they say, right, and once once you're overexposed and
Speaker 4: you've had enough pop culture references as well, which definitely
Speaker 4: revelation of the method is real and has a deep
Speaker 4: impact and on just the concept of allowable opinion. Right.
Speaker 4: And as time goes on, you know, the more people
Speaker 4: are exposed to these concepts, they'll become a little more
Speaker 4: willing to imagine a world where it's possible. And that's
Speaker 4: where we have to find ourselves. We have to do
Speaker 4: that painstaking work in order to position ourselves in a
Speaker 4: proper place just to be able to digest what everything
Speaker 4: that is coming at us in every direction. I mean, again,
Speaker 4: we talked about the demoralization aspect of the media cycle.
Speaker 4: It's far more than that, you know, the level of
Speaker 4: as I mentioned that that crazy context, the art to
Speaker 4: choke with with the long range turn, you know, and
Speaker 4: long term benefits of these potential kind of uses and
Speaker 4: sophisticated methods of just even poisoning the water supply or
Speaker 4: something of that nature, Right, It's like, how much have
Speaker 4: we honestly been chemically conditioned as a population at large
Speaker 4: to become susceptible to some of this and vulnerable to
Speaker 4: levels of programming and levels of mind control that maybe
Speaker 4: we're not even aware of. And that was something that
Speaker 4: I thought of when I kind of went back over
Speaker 4: that revelation, was that how have I been actually directly
Speaker 4: affected by the chemical compounds in my environment right that
Speaker 4: have over the course of my lifetime had some sort
Speaker 4: of accumulated effect on just my perspective, you know, and
Speaker 4: my ability to interact with the world. And if you're
Speaker 4: willing to ask those questions and reflect enough on yourself
Speaker 4: and who you're becoming then and the ideas that you
Speaker 4: hold close and dear to your heart. And so that's
Speaker 4: that's hopefully how you can and at the very least
Speaker 4: course correct, you know, and and not fall into the
Speaker 4: traps that are preordained to to you know, lead us
Speaker 4: into a specific outcome. And that's all that I'm hoping
Speaker 4: to achieve. I mean, by these having these conversations, all
Speaker 4: I'm ever presenting is information that just was extraordinary to
Speaker 4: me that that kind of like it shocked me to
Speaker 4: my core and and resonated with me at a level
Speaker 4: to where I thought it almost kind of helped me
Speaker 4: redefine how I engaged with the power paradigm at large,
Speaker 4: and and all of all of the various levels of
Speaker 4: how it factors into Yeah, just again, this environment is
Speaker 4: is uh, yeah, we're at kind of an unprecedented moment
Speaker 4: in human history, and I think that none of us
Speaker 4: know exactly how to proceed. We're doing our best. And
Speaker 4: as long as you're doing your best and you're critically
Speaker 4: thinking through every step, then hopefully you'll find yourself in
Speaker 4: the right place and ethically speaking, right, because I think
Speaker 4: there's so much deception out there attempting to you know,
Speaker 4: appeal to your it's a it's appealing to emotion more
Speaker 4: than anything, because they that's how they set the traps, right.
Speaker 4: They want this over emotional reaction, so you need jerk
Speaker 4: into the wrong conclusion and and in reality, they you've
Speaker 4: taken the bait right and and unfortunately you won't be
Speaker 4: able to actually again acknowledge or identify the root cause.
Speaker 4: And and how on earth can you can you proceed
Speaker 4: forward with an ideology intact or or a foundation, uh
Speaker 4: you know, in place to not find yourself falling victim
Speaker 4: to the very same methods of deliberate deception that have
Speaker 4: you know, permeated through society for generations and and and
Speaker 4: cultivated the false framework in which we engage with reality
Speaker 4: in And that's what I view for if, for example,
Speaker 4: the psychic driving technique that Sir Han allegedly endured, doctor
Speaker 4: Ewan Cameron that I mentioned had made this famous, and
Speaker 4: this is all through direct mk ultra funding through Subproject
Speaker 4: sixty eight, which was the outsourcing of mk Ultra to
Speaker 4: Canada where he carried out specifically the Montreal experiments. And
Speaker 4: there's a range of time between like fifty seven to
Speaker 4: sixty four where apparently doctor Ewan Cameron was responsible for this. Now,
Speaker 4: many of his patients were at the Allen Memorial Institute
Speaker 4: of McGill University, and they're all going there for common
Speaker 4: medical issues, right, common problems like postpartum depression or anxiety disorders.
Speaker 4: But when they are there, they are actually subjected to
Speaker 4: his form of psychic driving, this driving technique, and then
Speaker 4: they're placed into a drug induced coma for weeks at
Speaker 4: a time. This legitimately appen to a lot of regular
Speaker 4: you know, ordinary civilians who were essentially just seeking the
Speaker 4: most standard medical you know, treatment that you could imagine.
Speaker 4: And some of the reports showed his victims legitimately forgetting
Speaker 4: their parents all together and thinking that their interrogators were
Speaker 4: their parents. Now, if you could scale back a person's
Speaker 4: mind to that level and then legitimately implement a past
Speaker 4: that entirely you know, fictitious, and they embraced that as reality. Now,
Speaker 4: this is something by the way, I took a screenshot earlier.
Speaker 4: Hold on, let me find it, because it was of
Speaker 4: Paul Binassi, who I mentioned a few times, and I
Speaker 4: was going back through his his testimony right that he
Speaker 4: gave during the Franklin court case. Right, I forget which
Speaker 4: which interview, I'll pull it in a second because it's
Speaker 4: very important. And basically he talks about how well you
Speaker 4: can see within the interview the interrogation of Paul Banassi,
Speaker 4: who's a victim of the Franklin scandal, and Lawrence King right,
Speaker 4: who basically ran the Franklin Credit Union, the Franklin Credit
Speaker 4: Union in Omaha, Nebraska.
Speaker 2: And we do end an episode on that one to
Speaker 2: the Franklin scandal. So this the TLDR of this this
Speaker 2: dude that was running a bank outpost was also a
Speaker 2: key figure of a satanic ring that was abducting and
Speaker 2: sexually abusing and murdering children for sacrificial purposes. It was
Speaker 2: a whole thing. And this wasn't in recent years. This
Speaker 2: was like back in the eighties or seventies. If I'm
Speaker 2: not mistaken, then he got caught.
Speaker 4: Well, it was the exact case. It's interesting because Franklin
Speaker 4: itself happened basically, the court case between Paul Banassi and
Speaker 4: Lawrence E. King happened in ninety nine, which is obviously
Speaker 4: after a little while after the actual case took place,
Speaker 4: because it was an eighty eight when it actually took
Speaker 4: place in Omaha, Nebraska, and you have you know, we're talking.
Speaker 4: Lauren C. King sang the national anthem at the Republican
Speaker 4: National Convention, right for I think it was George Bush Senior,
Speaker 4: if I remember correctly, might have been Reagan, but I
Speaker 4: think it was George Bush Senior, and which makes a
Speaker 4: lot of sense because it was actually members of his
Speaker 4: This is so crazy. So his Secret Service. They had
Speaker 4: a security detail where secret Service was running security twenty
Speaker 4: four hours a day at the apartment of Craig Spence
Speaker 4: who was running that was the individual perpetrator that was
Speaker 4: a CIA asset and a spook right for involved in
Speaker 4: the Confessions of a DC Madam book with Nick Bryant
Speaker 4: that he wrote specifically about how basically Henry Benson was
Speaker 4: running this prostitution operation and essentially was basically Henry Benson
Speaker 4: was just some closeted homosexual who was attempting to live
Speaker 4: some sort of lifestyle and in that way right where
Speaker 4: he was not entirely overt, he was clearly trying to this.
Speaker 4: He was basically kind of a nerd who was driven
Speaker 4: into hiring male prostitutes because he didn't quite know how
Speaker 4: to meet men and things of that nature. It's kind
Speaker 4: of a sad story, but he's basically set up with,
Speaker 4: you know, Frank Spence, who inevitably finds out that you know,
Speaker 4: he actually he had befriended some of the John's right,
Speaker 4: some of the male prostitutes that he had fraternized with,
Speaker 4: and essentially they found out that he was very competent
Speaker 4: in terms of his financials and things of that nature.
Speaker 4: So he was kind of a high minded businessman in
Speaker 4: a way enough to be able to run the financials
Speaker 4: of some sort of operation that would help benefit the
Speaker 4: Johns more than the actual you know, individuals who were
Speaker 4: procuring the Johns from the operation. And so he was
Speaker 4: trying to act in good faith on behalf of the
Speaker 4: male prostitutes because he was actually just a homosexual who
Speaker 4: really kind of liked them, right and was trying to
Speaker 4: do the best for them. And so inevitably this is
Speaker 4: all in DC right. Inevitably he meets up with this
Speaker 4: guy by who starts ordering some prostitutes from his service,
Speaker 4: by the name of Craig Spence, who they called him
Speaker 4: the Prince of Darkness. It's very, you know, strange that
Speaker 4: that was actually how he was referred to. But again,
Speaker 4: this all kind of surfaced whenever this major There was
Speaker 4: a Washington Times article that was published in like nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty nine, and it was published in a newspaper with
Speaker 4: the headline homosexual prostitution inquiry. Ensnares VIPs with Reagan Bush
Speaker 4: Hallboys took midnight tour of White House. Now, within an hour,
Speaker 4: the Washington Times would be gathered up and removed. Every
Speaker 4: issue of this paper would be gathered up and removed
Speaker 4: from newspaper vendors all throughout Washington, DC. That's how much
Speaker 4: it impacted the leadership.
Speaker 3: Now I want to ask you this the interview that
Speaker 3: you have a bonacci how long is it?
Speaker 2: Because realistically we only got about fifteen more minutes or
Speaker 2: so before we're gonna have to wrap this episode. So
Speaker 2: I don't know there's a longer one, a short one
Speaker 2: or what. But if you wanted to go ahead.
Speaker 4: Well, if I could stay on task, man, it would
Speaker 4: actually be.
Speaker 3: I apologize now, you're good, dude, I love it.
Speaker 4: This is why awesome. And keep in mind, man, like,
Speaker 4: if you want to speak on like a specific case
Speaker 4: you know that I've covered in the past, I'm always
Speaker 4: we could do even parts on that. So at any
Speaker 4: moment if you want, if you want me to come
Speaker 4: back on and you want me to cover a specific case,
Speaker 4: I would more than more than willing obviously to do that.
Speaker 4: But we're going to have.
Speaker 3: You back on many more times for sure.
Speaker 4: Appreciate you guys. But yeah, this this clip's not very
Speaker 4: long at all, and I'll try and actually prioritize the
Speaker 4: one that matters most because essentially there's there's really this
Speaker 4: never foreseen footage of the Finder's Cult, which I found
Speaker 4: to be extraordinary, but it doesn't necessarily apply. But at
Speaker 4: the beginning of the clip is this interesting recruiting technique
Speaker 4: and operation that the CIA was running in the fifties
Speaker 4: to essentially provide themselves with an opportunistic avenue to procure children.
Speaker 4: And so the notion is obviously that this is a
Speaker 4: longstanding operation and strategic playbook they've been implementing and operating
Speaker 4: under for quite some time. But in terms of just
Speaker 4: Monarch in general, because just to make it as short
Speaker 4: and and uh, you know, just sort of efficient as possible,
Speaker 4: I guess I should focus on just Banasi in general,
Speaker 4: so we can provide that clip, and then who we
Speaker 4: can kind of come to an end. But Banasi obviously
Speaker 4: suffered from MPD multiple personality disorder. It's now referred to
Speaker 4: often as the ID, this social of identity disorder, very similar,
Speaker 4: and he claimed as a young person. I think his
Speaker 4: abuse began as young as seven years old, as early
Speaker 4: as seven years old, because he claims at one point
Speaker 4: during the actual footage of the interrogation he actually switches
Speaker 4: alters into another person who is he. Yeah, he only
Speaker 4: responds to as west Lee, and west Lee is basically
Speaker 4: the original alternate identity that he was provided that was
Speaker 4: created through the Monarch Project, and essentially this all happened
Speaker 4: while he's seven years old and during traumatic sexual abuse,
Speaker 4: and west Lee is basically the alternate for the alternate
Speaker 4: identity for the child prostitute. And the purpose behind this
Speaker 4: was for him to obviously strategically gain blackmail on certain
Speaker 4: political targets, right, which was kind of the context of it.
Speaker 4: But it's more than just that. There's statements he made
Speaker 4: where he basically went on a private jet with Lawrence E.
Speaker 4: King where they went to Vegas, and that as much
Speaker 4: as Ted Gunderson glows like the sun and was a
Speaker 4: sort of controlled opposition limited hangout, he is, much of
Speaker 4: what he presented was actually legitimately true, right, And so
Speaker 4: it's a difficult task to kind of distinguish what was
Speaker 4: the kind of what was the deliberate deception he was
Speaker 4: presenting and in a way that was layered into a
Speaker 4: lot of the cases that he could and so it's
Speaker 4: an unfortunate thing you have to kind of remain skeptical
Speaker 4: throughout his criminal cases. But obviously I think he provided
Speaker 4: things of very real value that many people could take
Speaker 4: and run with and dive down these rabbit holes and
Speaker 4: come out the other end with with real applicable information
Speaker 4: and evidence that that you can corroborate on your own,
Speaker 4: so you don't have to rely on solely on Ted
Speaker 4: Gunderson as a as a resource, right, and and we
Speaker 4: should as often as possible try and make sure we
Speaker 4: we legitimately have, you know, just evidence that we've tried
Speaker 4: to cooberate and substantiate just as much as possible. But anyway,
Speaker 4: the point being zeb Paul Binosti, obviously he's claims that
Speaker 4: he was transported across the US, was forced to have
Speaker 4: sex with various people, now obviously internationally as well, because
Speaker 4: he talks about being there at the foundation of nambla
Speaker 4: North American Man Boy Love Association. He says this was
Speaker 4: a pedophile operation in order to normalize pedophilia.
Speaker 2: Which obviously, like obviously and the fact that they ran
Speaker 2: for as long as they did still blows my fucking mind.
Speaker 4: Insane man. And this is all like he had an
Speaker 4: attorney originally Paul Binassi, but his name was he was
Speaker 4: John DeCamp, the ex senator, right, I believe from Nebraska. Yeah,
Speaker 4: he was from the district of Nebraska. I believe. But anyway,
Speaker 4: he inevitably had a million dollar default judgment that was
Speaker 4: awarded to him and for emotional abuse, battery, false imprisonment,
Speaker 4: and conspiracy of all things, which I heard was wasn't
Speaker 4: true obviously, if you know where that term was coined
Speaker 4: in the first place. The CIA created that term to
Speaker 4: deflect and undermine the credibility of anyone questioning the Warrant
Speaker 4: Commission report on behalf of the JFK assassination. You might
Speaker 4: as well be Lee Harvey Oswald. Uh, you know I
Speaker 4: if you actually question the Warrant Commission report. And and
Speaker 4: that was why the CIA created the term conspiracy theorist,
Speaker 4: because they wanted to use it as a pejorative in
Speaker 4: order to do exactly that. It was only created for
Speaker 4: that purpose. So how fascinating, you know.
Speaker 3: All right, let's put it because I know we're gonna
Speaker 3: have to get out of here, just all right.
Speaker 4: Brother, I'm starry, No, you're good. This is why we
Speaker 4: say on already dead Schitzo bros. A symbol.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 4: It's kind of my plights in a real way. But
Speaker 4: but at the same time, I'm very grateful, you know,
Speaker 4: because I feel as if it's led me down this
Speaker 4: path and and it's I've only really benefited from it
Speaker 4: as much as it's been kind of a character defect
Speaker 4: at times. But yeah, the podcast, I thank you, thank
Speaker 4: you brother. Yeah we see. I'm going to try and
Speaker 4: share it now because be able to.
Speaker 3: I shouldn't have to give you permission or whatever.
Speaker 4: Oh cool, let me see, I know I have to
Speaker 4: share sound there we go. Yeah, oh shit, I shouldn't
Speaker 4: do an entire screen hold on share the whole screen
Speaker 4: all right, So obviously what I think is, well, we
Speaker 4: should listen to this first and then uh, it's created by.
Speaker 7: Our government program which mon and what's Ronnick is an
Speaker 7: operation that was created by the United States government to
Speaker 7: trade spies for other countries. They use children for the
Speaker 7: purpose that they were easily integrated into multiple personalities because
Speaker 7: they can associate. Program was two, as a young man,
Speaker 7: get adults who were powerful political leaders in tune positions
Speaker 7: where they could be compromised. That was your mission. That
Speaker 7: was the initial mission. The whole mission was for me
Speaker 7: to go into the military service and become an officer.
Speaker 7: In a few years after that, retire from the service,
Speaker 7: not retire after twenty years, but after six years and
Speaker 7: moved to Germany. And then their initial plan to take
Speaker 7: over or to run the government was to put me
Speaker 7: in an ambassador's spot and then later to come back
Speaker 7: to the United States and to run for an office.
Speaker 7: And they would be the ones who controlled everything that
Speaker 7: I did, so you would be an operative, so to speak.
Speaker 8: I would be a puppet, a puppet.
Speaker 2: And you say this plan broke down in nineteen eighty six,
Speaker 2: but yet you told me that you still felt that
Speaker 2: you were under the control.
Speaker 7: I am still under the control because they I do
Speaker 7: not answer phones anymore, because that's how they get the.
Speaker 2: Others to the triggers.
Speaker 7: Would I'll call them. They're not personalities. They contain them
Speaker 7: memories at all. They would put in as hypnotic suggestions
Speaker 7: and only come out when, as I said, a code
Speaker 7: is presented to them. And that happened several times in
Speaker 7: nineteen eighty nine, which is why Paul and Mikey's memories
Speaker 7: are so confused. At that time, they were attempting to
Speaker 7: destroy me because they were attempting to access suicidal personalities
Speaker 7: and other personalized that would get me in trouble would
Speaker 7: law enforcement when they programmed the personalities are the triggers
Speaker 7: as I call them uh huh. They would call me
Speaker 7: up and they would use a code. I would simply
Speaker 7: switch into that trigger, go to where they call me
Speaker 7: to go, whether it would be or you know, when
Speaker 7: they were playing, cause they would already have the tickets there.
Speaker 7: They would have the tickets there under a name that
Speaker 7: only that trigger would know, and go to wherever it
Speaker 7: was there would be somebody waiting for in essay that
Speaker 7: take them to where they were supposed to go to
Speaker 7: bring them back to their put them on the plane.
Speaker 7: They would come back home, and as soon as they
Speaker 7: walked in the door, the memory of everything that had
Speaker 7: just happened would be be rasigned completely.
Speaker 4: Damn as far as safe for legitimately eradicating memories of
Speaker 4: something that this was split personality spy. It is something
Speaker 4: they had attempted to cultivate, you know, as early as
Speaker 4: the fifties, as we had mentioned before, at the very least,
Speaker 4: I think, you know, there are many things that there's
Speaker 4: a Project Monarch article written by Ron Patten. Well, you know,
Speaker 4: we can discuss it at a later date at some
Speaker 4: point potentially, but the point being is that he goes
Speaker 4: into the fact that you know, this could very well
Speaker 4: be there's a level of monarch programming where essentially the
Speaker 4: altars are actually it's demonic possession in a way. Sure,
Speaker 4: and it's so fascinating is listening to the language he
Speaker 4: uses and and the the details he provides makes it
Speaker 4: very compelling and worthwhile in considering the fact that that
Speaker 4: this this goes back to ancient human history. Alchemy was
Speaker 4: was was magic. I mean that's what it legitimately was,
Speaker 4: and and science, right is what it's evolved into. But
Speaker 4: in reality it was you know, this is just a
Speaker 4: different reference point, uh, in terms of the modern prevailing
Speaker 4: culture and in society at the time. And and the
Speaker 4: fact of the matter is, i mean mind control was
Speaker 4: more than likely just a reference to as as possession
Speaker 4: or things of that nature in the past. And and
Speaker 4: we've kind of out of context, you know, just misinterpreted
Speaker 4: exactly what took place. But I do really think this
Speaker 4: is a longstanding tool of the permanent establishment, and they've
Speaker 4: been exploiting it to their benefit for for far too
Speaker 4: long to further entrench this this dystopian agenda and and
Speaker 4: the ultimate inevitable as I've described it in the past,
Speaker 4: as a totalitarian tiptoe, which is taking broad leaps at
Speaker 4: this point, and it's it's up to us to the
Speaker 4: pushback as much as possible. So on the next one,
Speaker 4: maybe we can we can get into one of these
Speaker 4: cases in particular, so I can go into a better
Speaker 4: detail and have a little bit more preparation for like again,
Speaker 4: just I think sometimes when you gain that that just
Speaker 4: descriptive window into the possibilities that have been legitimately corroborated,
Speaker 4: as as a real life evidence of this taking place
Speaker 4: and transpiring in a way that you never could have
Speaker 4: probably conceptualized on your own. How can you move forward
Speaker 4: and internalize anything without that factoring in, you know? And
Speaker 4: I can only hope that we we kind of provide
Speaker 4: people with the starting point and take some of this
Speaker 4: information and supply it in their own lives and hopefully
Speaker 4: find themselves in a better position because of it. But
Speaker 4: I can appreciate you guys more and the opportunity as well.
Speaker 2: Dude, We appreciate you coming on, honestly, you are a
Speaker 2: wealth of knowledge. We do need to do this again
Speaker 2: sooner routher than later, and not wait a year between
Speaker 2: it for sure, for all the cult members that may
Speaker 2: not know where you're from where they could find you
Speaker 2: your podcast? Please give yourself all the shameless plugs. Where
Speaker 2: can the good cult members check you out?
Speaker 4: Hell? Yeah, thank you man? And yeah, So my podcast
Speaker 4: is the underclass podcast. That's that's basically the Umbrella Project
Speaker 4: where all my solo episodes that I kind of produce
Speaker 4: on my own they fall into that category as well
Speaker 4: as my referring weekly show every Tuesday night, nine thirty
Speaker 4: Eastern Time with Jose Gallisson from Norway. Jose, we do
Speaker 4: already Dead and it's a calling show as well. Also
Speaker 4: we call it everyone's favorite weekly calling conspiracy variety show.
Speaker 4: So we do our best. It's kind of a you
Speaker 4: never know where the conversation will go, that's for damn sure.
Speaker 4: But I feel like we try and to also just
Speaker 4: in a way almost find the fun in things. As
Speaker 4: much as this is a demoralizing in terms of just
Speaker 4: the outcome of things in the agenda at large, we
Speaker 4: try and kind of appreciate the silver linings, you know,
Speaker 4: and maybe spend things in a more humorous direction, so
Speaker 4: we aren't quite as demoralized by the end of the episode,
Speaker 4: but you know, yeah, but other than that, I have
Speaker 4: a Paywalt show on Patreon only, and I think even
Speaker 4: at the lowest level three dollars you can access it.
Speaker 4: It's called whatever this is with me Brad Binkley from
Speaker 4: the Propaganda Report podcast and Sam Tripley from obviously tenfoil hats.
Speaker 4: So it's been a huge blessing and it's always probably
Speaker 4: the highlight of my week. So other than that, it's
Speaker 4: nothing beloved for me, and I really do. I'm forever
Speaker 4: grateful for these opportunities, man, And and when I get
Speaker 4: to sit down and have a conversation with people like
Speaker 4: yourselves who are obviously open minded and and I could
Speaker 4: tell just by meeting you at bro Grove it was
Speaker 4: going to be an easy conversation. But you know, I'm
Speaker 4: sorry if I kind of spin off in too many
Speaker 4: different directions, But brother, we.
Speaker 3: Do the same shit.
Speaker 2: We were all add as fuck over here. But yeah,
Speaker 2: not we need to have you back on and just
Speaker 2: go even longer. We are under some weird time constraints
Speaker 2: on this evening, so we're gonna have to wrap it
Speaker 2: at this point.
Speaker 3: But honestly, we could do this for.
Speaker 2: Like four hours and probably just keep fucking firing away,
Speaker 2: but we're gonna have to make this happen. What about
Speaker 2: your socials? Where can they find you on the social media?
Speaker 4: Oh? Yeah, yeah, you guys can follow me at I
Speaker 4: believe it's at theater Thug on Instagram thhe Thug and
Speaker 4: then theater thug awp on on Twitter. And also I
Speaker 4: have a podcast specifically from my pot or I mean
Speaker 4: a profile specifically from my podcast at underclass Pod on
Speaker 4: Twitter and at the Underclass Podcast on Instagram. So that's great.
Speaker 2: Finally, while we're giving the shameless plugs, you might as
Speaker 2: well give our own shameless plugs for of the good
Speaker 2: cult members that are seeing this or excuse me, that
Speaker 2: are hearing this on the audio platforms but would rather
Speaker 2: see it with their eyeballs. The only place to get
Speaker 2: the video footage of any of our episodes is to
Speaker 2: go to Patreon dot com slash cult to Conspiracy podcast.
Speaker 2: Over there, there's a couple of things that you'll have
Speaker 2: at your disposal if you go to that lowest level tier.
Speaker 3: Not only you get these shows a couple of days
Speaker 3: in advance.
Speaker 2: Not only when you get to see the videos of
Speaker 2: all of the things that we do, but it's also
Speaker 2: the only place to get these shows absolutely commal.
Speaker 3: Listen. Commercial suck. Advertisements suck, we know that.
Speaker 2: Kick those ads out of here and come support us
Speaker 2: directly over at Patreon.
Speaker 3: But also if you go to that Third Eye All
Speaker 3: the Way Open tier, not.
Speaker 2: Only will you get the things we just listen, but
Speaker 2: you'll also get to join us every Tuesday night for
Speaker 2: our cult member live event.
Speaker 3: It's Unhinged, It's fun as hell.
Speaker 2: We thoroughly enjoy our family get togethers every Tuesday night.
Speaker 2: And also if you go to that Third Eye All
Speaker 2: the Way Open tier, you'll get to join Raven Lee
Speaker 2: for her book club every Sunday night.
Speaker 3: Raven tell them the things.
Speaker 5: Every Sunday night, we get together for one hour and
Speaker 5: basically during the week, I post some questions about the
Speaker 5: book that we are reading that month, and we just
Speaker 5: basically break it down and talk about all aspects of
Speaker 5: the book and maybe how it pertains to real life
Speaker 5: or if it doesn't. We just kind of break it
Speaker 5: down and have, you know, a bullshit kind of conversation.
Speaker 6: It's great.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, Also go check out Raven Lee's Patreon that she
Speaker 2: has on her own the Dark Sanctuary link in the
Speaker 2: description below. Also, come check out Cage to Night on Patreon.
Speaker 2: To join me for my Wednesday Night Lives where we
Speaker 2: talk geopolitics, we talk religion, we talk history. It's just
Speaker 2: an information sharing get together in and of itself. But
Speaker 2: also if you go to com slash Cult, a conspiracy
Speaker 2: podcast and go to that top tier, that manic tier,
Speaker 2: not only will you get everything we just listed this evening,
Speaker 2: but you'll also get exclusive merchandise mail directly to you
Speaker 2: from us as a massive token of our appreciation for
Speaker 2: you supporting us in this way. With that shameless plug
Speaker 2: out of the way, also we need to give the
Speaker 2: other ones. If you are somebody that likes to flavor
Speaker 2: your food, and you like good, wholesome, healthy seasonings, then
Speaker 2: go to Flavors of the Forest right now and use
Speaker 2: the promo code cult at checkout see ult to get
Speaker 2: fifteen percent off your order. All orders over thirty dollars
Speaker 2: is free shipping to your door. Come get you some
Speaker 2: Bigfoot breath. We love this shit. I genuinely use it
Speaker 2: on damn near every meal. It's freeze dried garlic with
Speaker 2: just a dash of salt. They got regular garlic, A
Speaker 2: spicy variety, a lion's main variety, a ginger variety. We
Speaker 2: are working on a Cajun line currently it's fucking phenomenal.
Speaker 2: If you're like if you like to flavor your food
Speaker 2: with good, healthy garlic, which I honestly believe we all
Speaker 2: need more garlic in our lives, then go to Flavors
Speaker 2: of the Forest and use a promo code CULT at checkout.
Speaker 2: If you are somebody that likes to uh or would
Speaker 2: like to get your start in the buying and selling
Speaker 2: and trading of gold and silver bullion, then go to
Speaker 2: link in the description below to Cocsilver dot com and
Speaker 2: get your start today. Listen, talk to your financial advisor,
Speaker 2: talk to your CPA who's ever handling your retirement portfolio,
Speaker 2: and ask them what they think about investing in precious metals.
Speaker 2: I promise you that they're going to tell you at
Speaker 2: least a portion of your retirement portfolio.
Speaker 3: Needs to be invested in the good shit.
Speaker 2: The best place to get your start is to go
Speaker 2: to Cocsilver dot com right now.
Speaker 3: Once again link in the description below.
Speaker 2: But now we've got all these shameless plugs out of
Speaker 2: the way, good Cult members, we need to let you know.
Speaker 3: First of all, Austin, thank you for joining us this evening.
Speaker 2: Everybody, go check out the Underclass Pod, all of his socials,
Speaker 2: all of his platforms, his Patreon, all the things. But
Speaker 2: another way you can support the show, good cult members
Speaker 2: and let everybody know what you thought about all of
Speaker 2: the things we talked about this episode.
Speaker 3: Would be too. Please hand the five stars that the
Speaker 3: Shares of.
Speaker 2: Lif suscribes complete but posting reviews, shares it, the frids,
Speaker 2: the family shares of where Here's the deal. The more
Speaker 2: activity the algorithmacies across all of our listening platforms, the
Speaker 2: more we get promoted, more potential listeners who could that
Speaker 2: become potential cult members.
Speaker 3: Like there are to fight. Ladies and gentlemen, go check
Speaker 3: out Minimistics job that show.
Speaker 2: And getting the same love respect over there with the
Speaker 2: five star views and positivity in the comments.
Speaker 8: Come check out the Cage to Knight. Also co check
Speaker 8: out the Dark Sanctuary and come join each of us
Speaker 8: for individual patron lives ve us every Monday night in
Speaker 8: nine pm Central. Links to those are in the description
Speaker 8: as well. And we thank you for everybody starting going
Speaker 8: to done so.
Speaker 2: And with all of this being said, this was another
Speaker 2: beautiful episode of the Cults of Conspiracy and I'm the
Speaker 2: Cajun Knight and there's one band important, streaming.
Speaker 3: Vital piece of information you need to learn just as
Speaker 3: soon as humanly possible.
Speaker 5: Nor pleasure presser