Speaker 1: No, I don't want to. Ward's emergency. I can't find
Speaker 1: my daughter. Okay, when was the last time you've seen her?
Speaker 1: There at the part seven, people say that somebody probably
Speaker 1: somebody's twister. Okay. How old is she? She's five years old? Okay?
Speaker 1: And what park are you at? Here? In Bristin Park? Okay,
Speaker 1: we're at the Brigston Park. Are you the one with
Speaker 1: the basketball court where high school is? Okay? So you're
Speaker 1: at the basketball courts behind the high school. Yes. Hello, friends,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the eleventh episode of our Land of the
Speaker 1: Lost series. In this video, we'll be discussing the disappearance
Speaker 1: of Dulse olives. Please make sure you share the links
Speaker 1: in the description box is share this video so we
Speaker 1: can help Dulse's family spread awareness. Was that said? Let's begin,
Speaker 1: D'll say Maria Alavez was born on April twenty fifth,
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen, and was just five years old when she
Speaker 1: went missing on September sixteenth, twenty nineteen, from Bridgeton City,
Speaker 1: New Jersey. Dulce is Hispanic with brown hair and brown eyes.
Speaker 1: At the time of her disappearance, she was approximately three
Speaker 1: feet tall and weighed between sixty and seventy pounds. She
Speaker 1: was last seen wearing a yellow shirt with an elephant
Speaker 1: on it, black and white pants, and white shoes. Her
Speaker 1: mother's name is Noemma Alavez Perez and she was just
Speaker 1: nineteen years old when Dulce disappeared. Dulce also had a
Speaker 1: little brother named Manuel, who was just three years old,
Speaker 1: a baby's sister who was born earlier in twenty nineteen
Speaker 1: named Estrella, and Noemma was five months pregnant when Dulce
Speaker 1: went missing. According to Noemma, Dulcie's father lives in Mexico,
Speaker 1: and when she told him she was pregnant with Dulce,
Speaker 1: he didn't believe the child was his and wasn't going
Speaker 1: to be a part of her life, and he never
Speaker 1: came around after she was born. With this, no Emma
Speaker 1: decided to raise Dulca without him, with the help of
Speaker 1: her parents, whom she and her children did live with
Speaker 1: in September of twenty nineteen. Something to keep in mind, though, is,
Speaker 1: according to no Emma, as Dulcie grew up, her biological
Speaker 1: father not only saw a resemblance to himself and realized
Speaker 1: that she was indeed his child, but also, according to
Speaker 1: no Emma, he told her he wanted custody of Dulcet,
Speaker 1: not visitation or parenting time, but full custody. On September sixteenth,
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, Noeima took Dulce, her brother, Manuel, and no
Speaker 1: Emma's eight year old sister to the corner store to
Speaker 1: get some ice cream. This is confirmed by surveillance footage
Speaker 1: from the store that shows the four of them getting
Speaker 1: ice cream there right around the time no Emma says
Speaker 1: they were there. After purchasing the ice cream, at around
Speaker 1: four pm, they all went to a local park that
Speaker 1: has a playground for the kids to eat their ice
Speaker 1: cream and play. This park is called Bridgeton City Park.
Speaker 1: No Emma stated that she parked her car facing the
Speaker 1: playground and about thirty yards away from it, so d'alce
Speaker 1: Manuel could go and play under her supervision, and she
Speaker 1: could stay in the car and help her little sister
Speaker 1: with her homework and scratch off a lottery tickets she'd
Speaker 1: just purchased at the same bodega where they bought ice cream. Now,
Speaker 1: many people immediately started to criticize and question no Emma's actions.
Speaker 1: Many wondered why she would bring an eight year old
Speaker 1: to the park and why that eight year old wouldn't
Speaker 1: want to play with the other children but instead sit
Speaker 1: in the car and do homework. Why couldn't she do
Speaker 1: her homework when they went home after the park. These
Speaker 1: were seemingly reasonable questions many members of the public were asking.
Speaker 1: Jema claimed that she kept her eyes on her two
Speaker 1: children as best she could and could see them at
Speaker 1: all times, except for about five to ten minutes when
Speaker 1: she couldn't see them, but she just assumed they were
Speaker 1: playing in the playground still, but maybe behind something where
Speaker 1: she couldn't see, and she thought they'd come back into
Speaker 1: view quickly. Obviously, this didn't happen, and again people were
Speaker 1: questioning her actions. Why would she not be completely panicked
Speaker 1: when she didn't see her three and five year old
Speaker 1: children for almost ten minutes. It isn't like their older children.
Speaker 1: These are very small and young children, who, in some
Speaker 1: people's opinions, were way too young to be off running
Speaker 1: around by themselves, even if they were in the direct
Speaker 1: line of side of their mother. To others, however, this
Speaker 1: was not necessarily suspicious when considering no Emma's young age.
Speaker 1: Here's where we start getting conflicting information as to what
Speaker 1: happened next, And it would take quite a while to
Speaker 1: recount every single story that's out there about what happened
Speaker 1: after Noemma realized she hadn't seen they'll say and Manuel
Speaker 1: from up to ten minutes. In the interest of saving time,
Speaker 1: I'll just tell you the two main things that were
Speaker 1: reported as far as to how no Emma realized something
Speaker 1: was wrong. CNN reported that Manuel had gone to the
Speaker 1: car and informed no Emma that something had happened to Dulcay. However,
Speaker 1: Noema stated that when she realized she hadn't seen the
Speaker 1: children in a while, she took her little sister out
Speaker 1: of the car and went to check on them. When
Speaker 1: they finally saw it, a little three year old Manuel.
Speaker 1: He was crying and his ice cream was on the ground. Now,
Speaker 1: we always like to get the benefit of the doubt
Speaker 1: to the victims, and had a grieving mother with a
Speaker 1: missing child, in our opinion, also a victim until proven otherwise.
Speaker 1: So let's just go with no Emma's account of going
Speaker 1: to find the children and seeing Manuel crying with his
Speaker 1: ice cream on the ground. Noema says that when she
Speaker 1: saw it Manuel like this, she immediately asked him where
Speaker 1: his sister was, and he allegedly pointed to a few
Speaker 1: little maintenance buildings off to the side. These buildings would
Speaker 1: contain equipment to up keep the park. Noema stated that
Speaker 1: about hearing this, she went to the backside of these
Speaker 1: little buildings and was calling for Dulce and looking for
Speaker 1: She also claims this is when she realized there was
Speaker 1: another entrance and exit to the park other than the
Speaker 1: once she had entered and parked in when they had
Speaker 1: initially arrived. This entrance an exit came off a little
Speaker 1: side path easily accessible from the main road, so in
Speaker 1: the whole park two entrances and exits exist. Louima says
Speaker 1: that she noticed that the only other people in the
Speaker 1: park were four girls off to the side on the
Speaker 1: basketball courts playing ball together, and that she didn't see
Speaker 1: anyone else who was there at the time when she
Speaker 1: was calling Dulce's name and looking for She said she
Speaker 1: saw a man leaving the park with his children as
Speaker 1: she entered, but he wasn't really there while they were,
Speaker 1: and while all of this was happening, he was leaving
Speaker 1: just as Noemma and her family were arriving. Apparently, she
Speaker 1: wasn't panicked at this point because she thought Dulce was
Speaker 1: just hiding and playing a game with her, as five
Speaker 1: year old little girls will do. Nouema said she looked
Speaker 1: for a little while longer and then decided to approach
Speaker 1: the four girls playing basketball and asked them if they
Speaker 1: had seen Dulce. According to Noema, these four girls claim
Speaker 1: they saw a man in a red van with tinted
Speaker 1: windows pull up through that little side path that led
Speaker 1: to the buildings. However, they didn't see or hear anything else.
Speaker 1: It has often been reported that these four girls actually
Speaker 1: stated that they saw this van and this man, but
Speaker 1: also that they saw him grab Dulce and put her
Speaker 1: into the back of it. There's no interviews at all,
Speaker 1: at least that we could locate that have an interview
Speaker 1: with these girls where they support this at all. All
Speaker 1: they seemed to have seen was the van pull in
Speaker 1: and then nothing else. They did give a description of
Speaker 1: the man they saw driving it. Though. This is where
Speaker 1: it gets so very confusing and a bit hard to report.
Speaker 1: The case has so much conflicting information and so many
Speaker 1: conflicting reports, it's really hard to nail down where exactly
Speaker 1: all of this misinformation came from. For example, Noemma claims
Speaker 1: the only other people in the park that she saw
Speaker 1: were the four girls playing basketball, and she says that
Speaker 1: these four girls only saw the one man enter the
Speaker 1: park in his red van. However, when the police made
Speaker 1: their statements, they actually let it be know that they're
Speaker 1: looking for two different men. That it supported witnesses saw.
Speaker 1: The confusion lies in which witnesses saw these men because
Speaker 1: they're port of the four girls again only states they
Speaker 1: saw one man and they were allegedly no other people
Speaker 1: men or women in the park that day. This is
Speaker 1: very confusing, but this isn't all that's hard to follow
Speaker 1: and that doesn't make much sense in this case, but
Speaker 1: we'll get to the rest of it as we navigate
Speaker 1: through it. Now, let's start with the description given by
Speaker 1: the girls playing basketball of the man in the red
Speaker 1: van with tinted windows, a black man. That's it. That's
Speaker 1: the entire description. Another witness, no idea where this witness
Speaker 1: came from, if it wasn't or the basketball girls or
Speaker 1: no Emma which it wasn't, came forward and gave a
Speaker 1: description of a completely different man. This witness, who was
Speaker 1: with two young children in the park that day, allegedly
Speaker 1: saw a man they described as a light Hispanic male
Speaker 1: between the ages of thirty and thirty five, stating at
Speaker 1: about five foot seven inches to hold and wearing a
Speaker 1: white T shirt and baseball cap with blue jeans. Allegedly,
Speaker 1: this man was driving a red van with tinted windows.
Speaker 1: Police made it very clear that this man was not
Speaker 1: a suspect. It was just someone they wanted to speak
Speaker 1: to in case he had seen anything or had any
Speaker 1: additional information that would be helpful in the investigation. Now,
Speaker 1: let's revisit no Emma's actions when she realized Dulce was missing.
Speaker 1: After looking for a daughter for about half an hour
Speaker 1: and after speaking to the girls playing basketball, she called
Speaker 1: nine one one and reported her daughter missing. In the
Speaker 1: nine one one call, no Emma says, seemingly through tears,
Speaker 1: I can't find my daughter. Are We were here down
Speaker 1: at the park and people said that someone probably took her.
Speaker 1: She then proceeds to tell the nine one one dispatcher
Speaker 1: where she is at the park by the basketball courts,
Speaker 1: the park by the high school, and she gives him
Speaker 1: Dulcie's AI. However, in this description, Noema has to ask
Speaker 1: her sister what Dulce was last wearing, and when she
Speaker 1: starts speaking to the dispatcher again, she tells them she
Speaker 1: doesn't remember what Dulce was wearing, except that she had
Speaker 1: on black and white like flowery pants and like some heels,
Speaker 1: some white heels at the quote. When this nine one
Speaker 1: one call was finally released to the public, as you
Speaker 1: can imagine, there were many questions, in quite a bit
Speaker 1: of suspicion. Why did no Emma say that witnesses were
Speaker 1: saying someone probably took Dulcet? Was she saying the girls
Speaker 1: at the basketball court said? This is this where the
Speaker 1: complicting reports come from as to what was seen that
Speaker 1: day and by whom Noema has always held firm that
Speaker 1: Dulcet knew all about stranger danger. She knew never to
Speaker 1: speak to reproach strangers, and to call for help if
Speaker 1: someone approached her. Because Noema was so sure that Dulcie
Speaker 1: wouldn't go anywhere with a random stranger, people started to
Speaker 1: speculate that maybe it had been someone she knew. Many
Speaker 1: felt like perhaps a child this young, even with having
Speaker 1: something like stranger danger ingrained into their mind, would still
Speaker 1: be very impressionable and easily manipulated by an adult who
Speaker 1: knows what they're doing. Public seemed to have a very
Speaker 1: hard time believing that if a five year old was
Speaker 1: offered something like candy or maybe the chance to see
Speaker 1: a puppy, that that five year old probably in most
Speaker 1: cases at least, would go off with whoever was offering
Speaker 1: them these things, because in a five year old's mind,
Speaker 1: anyone with something like candy or puppy couldn't possibly be
Speaker 1: a bad person. Also, would the concept of an adult
Speaker 1: doing harm to them ever really be understood by a
Speaker 1: child so young. However, maybe dulce was very mentally mature
Speaker 1: for her age at least, and other family members eventually
Speaker 1: showed up at the park and they all started searching
Speaker 1: for Dulcein. Noema's parents were there, and they actually shared
Speaker 1: custody with Noema and Dulcein. Technically, dul Saint lived in
Speaker 1: their grandmother, Noema's mother. The day after Dulcie was reported
Speaker 1: missing and amber alert was issued. Here's the description of
Speaker 1: the suspect associated with the amber alert. By foot six
Speaker 1: inches tall, possibly Hispanic male, with a thin build, with
Speaker 1: some acne on his face and no facial hair. He
Speaker 1: was wearing red pants, a black shirt, and orange sneakers.
Speaker 1: So this suspect doesn't seem to fit the black man
Speaker 1: description as the basketball court rul is described. And it's
Speaker 1: also not the description of the person of interest in
Speaker 1: the police sketch who was wearing the white hand and
Speaker 1: white T shirt. Where did this description come from? No idea?
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what we mean about this case. Everything
Speaker 1: is so very confusing, and some of it, like the
Speaker 1: suspect descriptions, makes no sense. With not much more to
Speaker 1: report by way of factional information, let's move on to
Speaker 1: some of the theories Dury. Number one is that no
Speaker 1: Emma knows what happened to Dulce. Why would she allow
Speaker 1: her two very small children, ages three and five, to
Speaker 1: run off to play by themselves while she sat in
Speaker 1: her car. How could she been watching them closely if
Speaker 1: she was at Middley scratching off a lottery ticket, ordinarily
Speaker 1: you would have to look down to scratch off one
Speaker 1: of those tickets. After realizing she couldn't see these two children,
Speaker 1: why did she wait up to ten minutes to get
Speaker 1: out of the car and go and investigate where they were.
Speaker 1: That's a very long time not to have eyes on
Speaker 1: two very small children. Now, we brought this up in
Speaker 1: the beginning of the story, and we're not the only
Speaker 1: ones who thinks it's very weird and very suspicious that
Speaker 1: Noema brought her kids and her little sister to the
Speaker 1: park just for her eight year old sister to sit
Speaker 1: in the car doing homework. Again, what eight year old
Speaker 1: kid is going to sit in the car doing homework
Speaker 1: of all things, on a nice day when they were
Speaker 1: at a park slash playground and the two children they
Speaker 1: came with her outside playing and having fun. Even if
Speaker 1: she did decides she wanted to do her homework at
Speaker 1: the playground instead of playing and having fun with the
Speaker 1: other kids, why would it be in the car. There
Speaker 1: are benches and tables at this park she could have
Speaker 1: sat at. Then Noema could have been even closer to
Speaker 1: her children and more readily available to them in case
Speaker 1: something happened. Why stay in the car. Some people speculate
Speaker 1: that this is because no Emma was purposely keeping her
Speaker 1: little sister away from the playground because she was setting
Speaker 1: her five year old daughter up to be kidnapped and
Speaker 1: didn't want the sister to see who was doing it.
Speaker 1: Because it was a known person such as the father,
Speaker 1: or just because she didn't want any more witnesses. No
Speaker 1: Emma said herself that her three year old was only
Speaker 1: able to point to the buildings. He couldn't talk yet
Speaker 1: and wouldn't be able to describe a suspect or really
Speaker 1: give any other information at all except this pointing to
Speaker 1: the maintenance sheds. It's also worth mentioning that while everyone
Speaker 1: else was searching for Dulca that day, no Emma was
Speaker 1: sitting down and eating pizza. Again, this could point to
Speaker 1: her age. She was only nineteen and possible immaturity to
Speaker 1: explain this, though. It could just be she is immature
Speaker 1: and couldn't grasp the seriousness of the situation because of
Speaker 1: her young age, but she is a mother, so not sure.
Speaker 1: Even that is a very reasonable explanation. What is reasonable
Speaker 1: about this, though, is that Noema was five months pregnant
Speaker 1: and really should have been going long periods of time
Speaker 1: without eating. People also went on to social media and
Speaker 1: started pulling up Noema's pass post, mainly her Facebook, where
Speaker 1: she was talking about doing drugs and drinking. Noema explained
Speaker 1: to the press when they asked about these posts that
Speaker 1: they were very old and from when she was younger
Speaker 1: and did have problems with drugs and alcohol, but that
Speaker 1: she'd long since been cleaned and had stopped using both
Speaker 1: alcohol and drugs. However, these posts couldn't have been made
Speaker 1: that long ago. She was nineteen, which is pretty young anyway.
Speaker 1: Of course, the police searched Noema's car and also her
Speaker 1: cell phone, wough each was given back to her. Eventually
Speaker 1: was seemingly no evidence found in either one. Noema was
Speaker 1: shown the police sketches of the men the witnesses claimed
Speaker 1: to have seen at the park that day and says
Speaker 1: she has no idea who any of them are. She
Speaker 1: vehemently denies knowing anything at all or knowing of anyone
Speaker 1: who would want to take her daughter, despite her husband
Speaker 1: supposedly wanting custody. This brings us to Noima went on
Speaker 1: the Doctor Phil show this television interview because not just
Speaker 1: a handful of locals helping to search for Dulcie to
Speaker 1: be suspicious of the young mother, but most of the nation,
Speaker 1: after singing it for themselves, many people who were advocates
Speaker 1: for Noema being innocent and started to have their doubts.
Speaker 1: When Doctor Phil asked Noema if there's anyone she could
Speaker 1: think of who would want to take her daughter. She
Speaker 1: told them that it could be a man who had
Speaker 1: asked her on a date but who she had turned down,
Speaker 1: and it also meant Dulce. Noima says that she thinks
Speaker 1: this man could have been involved somehow. Now remember, up
Speaker 1: until this went on the Doctor Phil show, she denied
Speaker 1: knowing anyone who could have done this, or basically anything
Speaker 1: about anything having to do with the abduction of her daughter.
Speaker 1: When Doctor Phil brought up the fact that many people
Speaker 1: are commenting on her lack of emotion, no Emma basically
Speaker 1: states that she just doesn't like to show emotion in
Speaker 1: front of people. Blame me. She doesn't even cry in
Speaker 1: front of her parents. After all, there's no guidebook for
Speaker 1: how to act when your child goes missing and people
Speaker 1: are blaming you or saying no more than you're letting on.
Speaker 1: She also claims to have taken a polygraph test, but
Speaker 1: says she doesn't know what the results are. A woman
Speaker 1: named Jackie Rodriguez who was helping with the search mainly
Speaker 1: by translating for Dulce's grandparents because they didn't speak English,
Speaker 1: and she was also interviewed by Doctor Phil. Doctor Phil
Speaker 1: said that to him. In his opinion, no Ema was
Speaker 1: suspicious in her lack of emotion and the way she
Speaker 1: spoke so nonchalantly about her daughter's disappearance. Doctor Phil said,
Speaker 1: I've work sadly with a lot of parents and children
Speaker 1: who have been abducted. I've never worked with a mother
Speaker 1: who has been as emotionally flat about a missing child
Speaker 1: as no Emma. Jackie Rodriguez, who also worked closely with
Speaker 1: no Eema during all this, responding to this quote by
Speaker 1: saying that she agreed no Emma seemed just a bit
Speaker 1: too calm given the circumstances. Jackie said, quote, I feel
Speaker 1: that she knows the child is okay. She's missing her,
Speaker 1: but I feel that she knows that she is okay.
Speaker 1: I want to believe that she cries at night. I
Speaker 1: want to say she is strong. I don't know. She's
Speaker 1: just strong for the public or herself. She just doesn't
Speaker 1: show emotion that much. End quote. Now let's move on
Speaker 1: to some other theories. Just because someone doesn't show emotion
Speaker 1: or it seems suspicious, that doesn't mean they are without
Speaker 1: facts and evidence to back it all up. We definitely
Speaker 1: cannot make any kind of determination one way or the
Speaker 1: other and anything else. It's just speculation a theory too.
Speaker 1: What about the biological father. Noima says, there's no way
Speaker 1: it was him, because he was in Mexico at the
Speaker 1: time and didn't have the money to even leave there,
Speaker 1: let alone get to Bridgeton and kidnapped Dulce. What many
Speaker 1: people immediately thought upon hearing this, though, was how he
Speaker 1: had just recently told Noema that he wanted custody of Dulcet,
Speaker 1: that he had finally realized by looking at her as
Speaker 1: she was growing up, that she was in fact his child.
Speaker 1: I stated earlier, he didn't say he wanted visitation or
Speaker 1: parenting time, but full custody, which most likely would have
Speaker 1: meant Dulce going to Mexico to live with him. Now
Speaker 1: we're not sure if police looked into whether or not
Speaker 1: he was actually in Mexico at the time or where
Speaker 1: his whereabouts weren't one way or the other, but this
Speaker 1: could be a likely theory. How happy do you think
Speaker 1: Noema was when this man, the father of her now
Speaker 1: five year old daughter, suddenly comes out of the woodwork
Speaker 1: after denying paternity and wanting nothing to do with a
Speaker 1: child for five years, essentially leaving no Emma at fourteen
Speaker 1: to be a single mother, even though Dulcie was raised
Speaker 1: by it. Noima's parents suddenly saying he now wanted full custody,
Speaker 1: essentially taking the child away from her, seems that would
Speaker 1: have been one nasty conversation and no Ema would have
Speaker 1: every right to have been super upset. However, we don't
Speaker 1: know how that conversation went, but can speculate not very well. Again,
Speaker 1: in the public opinion, this is the most plausible theory. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: there's not any more information about any investigation done into
Speaker 1: the biological father. Police did say they questioned the father
Speaker 1: and verified his alibi for that day. He was supposedly
Speaker 1: in college in Mexico. But it didn't necessarily have to
Speaker 1: be the father himself who came and took Dulce on
Speaker 1: the father's behalf. He could have sent someone else to
Speaker 1: do it again, though no information is available as to
Speaker 1: how far the investigation went. Considering the father, The only
Speaker 1: information we have is that his name is Edgar Perez
Speaker 1: and the FBI has spoken to him. That's it. Also
Speaker 1: the fact that there's a very disturbing lack of witnesses
Speaker 1: to this kidnapping broad daylight in a public place, a playground,
Speaker 1: no less, and nobody has since come forward giving any
Speaker 1: kind of a leader tip to be followed. This really
Speaker 1: bothered people until information came out about this community having
Speaker 1: a very large migrant presence and ICE essentially harassing anyone
Speaker 1: being questioned in regards to this case. Knowima's current boyfriend
Speaker 1: and father of an unborn baby at the time, while
Speaker 1: being questioned by the police, was also detained by ICE
Speaker 1: and threatened with deportation. Now we're not going to get
Speaker 1: political here, but if ICE truly operates this way, then
Speaker 1: that's understandable how it may have hindered the entire investigation,
Speaker 1: because witnesses aren't going to come forward at all if
Speaker 1: they think they have to worry about being threatened with
Speaker 1: deportation or being detained for long periods of time just
Speaker 1: for trying to be helpful or cooperating with this missing
Speaker 1: child investigation. Other thing we'd like to point out, because
Speaker 1: there's literally no more information available, is remember the kids
Speaker 1: each had an ice cream. When Noema found her son
Speaker 1: sitting there crying and pointing to the maintenance shed with
Speaker 1: his ice cream on the ground. Something had occurred to
Speaker 1: her Where was Dulcy's ice cream and spoon. If someone
Speaker 1: had come up and grabbed her or taken her by force,
Speaker 1: would she have dropped her ice cream or at least
Speaker 1: the spoon. How likely is it that she would have
Speaker 1: been able to hold onto these items while kicking and
Speaker 1: struggling to get away, assuming that's what she did while
Speaker 1: being taken by a complete stranger. Did she walked away
Speaker 1: with someone she knew and carried her ice cream with her?
Speaker 1: Or was she lured away a puppy, a kitten, candy,
Speaker 1: your mommy is hurt, et cetera. The only recent news
Speaker 1: on the case was that following Leeds police searched for
Speaker 1: her in Austintown, Ohio. No word on what the leads
Speaker 1: were or what came of them. I think we can
Speaker 1: safely assume that not much came of them, since there's
Speaker 1: no big breaking news in the case so far. Well, friends,
Speaker 1: thank you for tuning in to this episode eleven of
Speaker 1: our Land and Loss series. Please remember that we're asking
Speaker 1: everyone who watches this video please share it on social
Speaker 1: media with friends and family. Little Dulce is still missing,
Speaker 1: and you just might know the person who holds the
Speaker 1: key to solving this case. I look forward to your comments.
Speaker 1: Please be respectful of each other and to the families involved.
Speaker 1: Till we meet again, take care of yourselves and each other.
Speaker 1: I'm Steve Stockton and I'll talk to you next time.