Speaker 1: Oh, friends are.
Speaker 2: Hello, and welcome to the show.
Speaker 1: This is the Cult of Conspiracy, and my name's Jonathan,
Speaker 1: I'm Jack, and today we bring back your boy Brandon
Speaker 1: Kroll for part two of the show that we couldn't
Speaker 1: really finish earlier whenever it was uh, what was it?
Speaker 1: One Nation under Satan?
Speaker 3: Wow? Very good memory.
Speaker 1: Hey dude, I'm the editor over here, so I got
Speaker 1: to look at it multiple times, you know what I mean.
Speaker 4: Yes, indeed, so we had to have you back on
Speaker 4: because we did not get to finish the thought, we
Speaker 4: didn't get to hit all the keynotes. So today we're
Speaker 4: gonna continue on that thread. We're gonna finish that sermon
Speaker 4: in a certain regard.
Speaker 5: And uh, you know, let's let's end up. Let's see
Speaker 5: where we end up at the end of it all.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm I'm really excited to get into the rest
Speaker 1: of this. I mean, unfortunately, I'm not gonna be able
Speaker 1: to stick around for as long as I need because
Speaker 1: there's a bunch of preparation I got to do in
Speaker 1: order for the the uh Brohemian Grove trip that we're
Speaker 1: leaving for in the morning. So, uh, if you're listening
Speaker 1: to this right now, we are already in Florida, and uh,
Speaker 1: and we're probably about to go up on stage the
Speaker 1: next day and give our our take on Pizzagate, which is.
Speaker 4: Awesome indeed, indeed, and just say, anybody who doesn't know already.
Speaker 4: Brandon comes with a lot of slide shows, a lot
Speaker 4: of visual aids, a lot of symbol limbs like Jesus
Speaker 4: my words, symbolism and symbolic pictures that we break down
Speaker 4: and analyze. So if before we get started here, if
Speaker 4: you would like to see what we are talking about
Speaker 4: rather than just hear it. And if you're tired of
Speaker 4: these commercials, you're tired of them coming in every seven
Speaker 4: and a half minutes, listen.
Speaker 5: I get it.
Speaker 4: I have a freaking regular Spotify account like everybody else.
Speaker 5: Okay, I hate them too.
Speaker 4: And if you're tired of it all and you want
Speaker 4: to see it all, Jonathan tell them where they can.
Speaker 1: Go Patreon dot com slash Culture Conspiracy podcast or rockfan
Speaker 1: dot com slash Culture Conspiracy. If you would like to
Speaker 1: join us for our live every Tuesday night at nine pm,
Speaker 1: you'll be able to come over to Patreon. That link
Speaker 1: is down the show notes below it. If you sign
Speaker 1: up for the third eye all the way open to.
Speaker 1: That's what you get access to the live shows every
Speaker 1: Tuesday night at nine pm Central. It's always a hell
Speaker 1: of a time over there, all the good cult members
Speaker 1: over there with that third eye all the way and
Speaker 1: just blazing through three hours like it's a fart in
Speaker 1: the wind. Time flies when you're having a good time.
Speaker 3: Dude.
Speaker 1: That's just the way that it is. And it's really
Speaker 1: just family. So if you want to build your family
Speaker 1: up a little bit thicker, a little bit deeper, build
Speaker 1: some bonds that maybe you feel like the uh, the
Speaker 1: outsider in your family, maybe you're maybe you're your anti is, Like,
Speaker 1: what are you doing with that third eye? You know
Speaker 1: that satanic? You say, nay, it's not satanic. This is
Speaker 1: my third eye all the way up, and it's my
Speaker 1: spiritual third eye. And I'm looking at all these conspiracies
Speaker 1: with six D. That's how we're that's how we're playing
Speaker 1: over here, because you have to. In this crazy world.
Speaker 1: We don't understand the basis of this reality. This is
Speaker 1: all of some kind of matrix, and there are people
Speaker 1: that learn how to control it. And I'll be damned
Speaker 1: if we don't catch onto a single fucking thing. So anyway,
Speaker 1: come over to patreon dot com and uh give us
Speaker 1: a follow, and it's the best way to be able
Speaker 1: to support the show. And it's completely commercial free.
Speaker 5: I love it when you rant. Dude, that was solid.
Speaker 1: That's the coffee running through me. Baby fuck yeah man, yeah, buddy,
Speaker 1: all right, Brandon, let's uh, let's get into it. Brother.
Speaker 3: We have a girl who met in college that I
Speaker 3: told her it should have been a great T shirt
Speaker 3: to shut up.
Speaker 1: I'm caffeinated, yeah for real, Yeah, dude, yeah the coffee. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm like five cups deep. So uh oh.
Speaker 3: It's ready to go tonight.
Speaker 5: Wow. Yes, I'm actually slacking.
Speaker 4: This is yeah one of these Kansas three hundred milligrams right,
Speaker 4: I as of today, I think may have only had
Speaker 4: like six hundred milligrams grand total.
Speaker 5: That's low for me. Brother.
Speaker 1: Wow, I'm surprised you're awake.
Speaker 5: Mm hmm. That's why I'm chucking this one now, bro.
Speaker 5: We riding deep.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get into it, guys.
Speaker 3: So we were touching off last time with some symbols
Speaker 3: that are in the US Capitol, and we have another
Speaker 3: one on the ceiling here Washington as Osiris rising as
Speaker 3: above of so below symbolism very interesting because Osyrus is
Speaker 3: an equivalent of Nimrod in the Bible. He often depict
Speaker 3: it as that X thing that you see all those
Speaker 3: celebrities doing in Hollywood. It means we can ascend to
Speaker 3: become our own gods at some point down the line.
Speaker 3: That's what these people believe. Whether you want to believe
Speaker 3: it or not. They do.
Speaker 4: A Waconda Forever had more than one look symbol behind it.
Speaker 3: I see what, Oh yeah, and that's I always chuckle
Speaker 3: because people are over here thinking, well, it just means this.
Speaker 3: It's like, well, they create clever little ways. So the
Speaker 3: way you're entertained is the way you recycle it and
Speaker 3: remember it with everybody else. But it's not reality. So
Speaker 3: atop the rotunda the Capitol Building is the Apothosis of Washington,
Speaker 3: which portrays George Washington becoming a God symbolic of Osyrus rising.
Speaker 3: Apothosis means ascension into God likeness. If God, Yeah, if
Speaker 3: you was selling to be an Anglican Christian hung out
Speaker 3: with some Jesuits than he's doing, or that he has
Speaker 3: artwork again with the bah Mett thing that we saw
Speaker 3: with the sword towards his chest and we're seeing this
Speaker 3: in the rotunda. At a certain point you kind of
Speaker 3: have to question was that all just a sham? Was
Speaker 3: that the cover? Were you just going to a denomination
Speaker 3: and you really worked a Christian? Is that your masonry
Speaker 3: is kicking in? Brother m M. Probably probably man becoming
Speaker 3: a god. That's what they believe, is that they can
Speaker 3: ascend to find the light within. Like I said, I'm
Speaker 3: doing a presentation right now. Why were they dancing showing
Speaker 3: how Building seven connects to the inside of a Masonic lodge?
Speaker 3: Is that that's what the whole ceremony was, is walking
Speaker 3: between the two pillars and ascending to become your own God.
Speaker 4: I've been hearing more people bring up Building seven in
Speaker 4: the last few weeks, like for the record, a lot
Speaker 4: of us of the Truth or movement, the conspiracy movement. Yeah,
Speaker 4: we've all been pointing this out, but like out of nowhere,
Speaker 4: it's becoming like low key trending again. In more than
Speaker 4: one way, it's I'm happy to hear it, be.
Speaker 3: Honest, yes, and only considering only like five percent formerly
Speaker 3: knew of it. I'm hoping that this particular episode gains
Speaker 3: traction because already the coordination aspect. This ties into it,
Speaker 3: but it's more specifically focusing what was the special dancing
Speaker 3: aspect that we hear about, But it's like, why were
Speaker 3: they dancing? It's like, okay, so they were dancing, but
Speaker 3: why what was the symbology that went down that made
Speaker 3: them go, Yeah, he'd become all giddy like schoolgirls. Big
Speaker 3: stuff went down, And that's what I'm explaining in that
Speaker 3: particular episode. So this is Luciferian doctrine that originated from
Speaker 3: the premises, the promises of the serpent in the Garden
Speaker 3: of Eden. If this was a Christian nation, George Washington
Speaker 3: should be surrounded by Biblical figures like Jesus, Moses, Michael,
Speaker 3: and the Apostles. Instead, we see pagan gods, fallen angels,
Speaker 3: and seventy two Satanic pentagrams on its borders.
Speaker 4: Significant number from multiple cultures for multiple reasonssolutely.
Speaker 3: One world religion. Why is that an our capital?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Again, don't take my word for it, but as we know,
Speaker 3: the Washington Monument, as I said before, and the Lincoln thing.
Speaker 3: Guess who helped us finish that. After the Masons started
Speaker 3: building it, we ran out of some was it white stone, whatever?
Speaker 3: We were building this at White Marble. H.
Speaker 4: Well, it was the Civil War that kind of broke
Speaker 4: up the the building of it, you could see because
Speaker 4: like before the Civil Wars one color and then after
Speaker 4: the Civil War when they continued the building is the other.
Speaker 5: But yeah, it was like cut from a different warry allegedly.
Speaker 3: Something when they stopped. Was it after the Civil War
Speaker 3: when they kicked it back up? Is that you're saying, Yeah,
Speaker 3: I thought it was eighteen fifty three when they had
Speaker 3: to cut call it quits because they were running out.
Speaker 4: I'm not sure if it was because they were running
Speaker 4: out at the quarry, but I know that at least
Speaker 4: the building was halted be like during the Civil War
Speaker 4: and it didn't command.
Speaker 5: Back until again.
Speaker 3: Yeah yea, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 5: So very well.
Speaker 4: Could be because of the quarry situation. The Civil War
Speaker 4: was an outlier. I just I knew at least that
Speaker 4: was the time frame.
Speaker 3: Gotcha, yeahta. Well. Either the case, it's still a symbol
Speaker 3: of bail bayal and the fact that they are affiliating
Speaker 3: that with Washington only gives another symbol to the all
Speaker 3: seeing eye. Is if you're watching with the visual you
Speaker 3: will note that there's the two circles of it, and
Speaker 3: it creates the all seeing eye, which we see in
Speaker 3: the Vatican. Much as people like to say no, no, no,
Speaker 3: it's like, well, why is the symbolism in their churches? Yep, yeah,
Speaker 3: it's of your own.
Speaker 5: Guy looks like Iris Souren to be honest with you.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I'm having a lot of second thoughts about
Speaker 3: our boy that wrote The Lord of the Rings the symbol.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah. There was one text I read and I
Speaker 3: wish I had screenshot it. It was on Instagram, and reading
Speaker 3: it made me reread it and it was going, Dude,
Speaker 3: that sounds incredibly masonically cryptid.
Speaker 5: But was that the point per the book and per
Speaker 5: the storyline? You know what I mean? Like, was it
Speaker 5: was it potentially him doing.
Speaker 4: Research to make a character because he was a master
Speaker 4: of building entire character arcs and all these things. I'm
Speaker 4: just saying, with proper context, is that what the case is?
Speaker 5: Or is it Tolkien speaking on behalf of Tolkien.
Speaker 3: It's really hard for me to say. I know somebody
Speaker 3: else was trying to go after C. S. Lewis and
Speaker 3: was saying, well, why did he pick as the first
Speaker 3: individual to meet Lucy? Was the satur or it came
Speaker 3: mister Tumnus a little yeah, and because again that does
Speaker 3: have a connection with the devil figure with the hornes.
Speaker 3: So they were bringing up some interesting little things and
Speaker 3: then they bring Santa Claus into the whole thing, and
Speaker 3: it kind of makes you, I don't know, I'm not
Speaker 3: gonna go down that rabbit hole and bash or say
Speaker 3: yes or no. I would have to still dig before
Speaker 3: I can come to my own opinion. But it did
Speaker 3: make me scratch my head at the symbolism in that
Speaker 3: particular quote, which I do not know at this time,
Speaker 3: so I can't give a bull foryone else's but it
Speaker 3: did make me raise my eyebrow.
Speaker 4: Of I'm with you, okay, And I don't even know
Speaker 4: that there was a quote like that out there, and
Speaker 4: I just and maybe maybe I'm just a super tokein fan,
Speaker 4: and like I want him to stay the legend and
Speaker 4: the bastion of you know, good writing while still maintaining
Speaker 4: Christian values, and like all of the I want that
Speaker 4: to still be true. So like I'm in that whole saying,
Speaker 4: ain't so phase if this is real, but if there's
Speaker 4: something to.
Speaker 5: It, then like it it must be explored.
Speaker 3: Yes, if I find it, I will definitely chat about it.
Speaker 3: The other aspect that I found interesting, because Paul Revere
Speaker 3: was a Mason, is that we have that one if
Speaker 3: by land too, if by sea?
Speaker 5: Yeah, he never said that apparently.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but again this was connecting. I actually dated a
Speaker 3: girl that her grandfather was the guy that put the
Speaker 3: light as new as something. I think it was Newman,
Speaker 3: the priest guy that put in the churches.
Speaker 5: People, Oh, that's awesome.
Speaker 3: And her brother actually runs I think the museum. I
Speaker 3: actually was dating her for a bit. Very cute girl,
Speaker 3: beautiful blue eyes. But anyways, I found that interesting that
Speaker 3: that particular phrase was allegedly, you know, all like if
Speaker 3: you put two lanterns in the window or whatever, and
Speaker 3: this means that they're gonna be coming by land to
Speaker 3: by sea. Well, interestingly enough, did that have anything to
Speaker 3: do with revelation? From a vantage points, he is joined
Speaker 3: by two helpers, the beast of the sea and the
Speaker 3: beast of the earth.
Speaker 5: You're saying the two lanterns were a symbolic of the.
Speaker 3: Two Antichrist coming out of the sea given authority to
Speaker 3: the power of the dragon and Revelation thirteen one through
Speaker 3: ten and the other one from the Earth Revelation eleven
Speaker 3: through fifteen. Now, if the sea is connecting to the Vatican,
Speaker 3: and then you have the other one, that one of
Speaker 3: the Earth. And as I've been stating, Helios East meets West,
Speaker 3: somebody is bringing us back to Maryland, which I'm going
Speaker 3: to have in a slide or two. Yeah, Maryland or
Speaker 3: Vatican conjoining the two. I was just fine. It very
Speaker 3: interesting that that's a phrase in the very inception of
Speaker 3: America getting its own independence quote unquote. And then we
Speaker 3: have a movie and again I wouldn't pitch just without
Speaker 3: a little what off, because we had that movie that
Speaker 3: came out this year of Godzilla X Kong. Yeah, New
Speaker 3: Empire and what is Godzilla coming out from the base
Speaker 3: of in that movie? At least from what I saw
Speaker 3: on the trail, I didn't even bother to watch that garbage.
Speaker 5: I gonna say, I hadn't seen it. I'm gonna be
Speaker 5: honest with you.
Speaker 4: I'm kind of over the Michael Bay action film for
Speaker 4: the hell of it, Like.
Speaker 5: I had that phase. Oh no, no, I just I
Speaker 5: kind of put it all on that same sub genre,
Speaker 5: you know what I mean, Like over the top.
Speaker 4: Animation over the top like fight scenes and the explosions
Speaker 4: and oh like, I love it, but I'm also I
Speaker 4: just can't find myself paying twenty five dollars to go
Speaker 4: do that, you know.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, but they have a thing where the Kong.
Speaker 3: Yeah Cong's coming out. I think it's Kng. I haven't
Speaker 3: seen the movie, but in the trailer, look like Cong
Speaker 3: comes out from the base of the pyramid.
Speaker 5: Oh shit.
Speaker 3: And then in the trailer they're showing of course Godzilla
Speaker 3: Beast of the Sea. And interestingly enough, that takes place
Speaker 3: over I think in Brazil where they have the hermetic
Speaker 3: Messiah figure, the Messenger between the gods, the statue. Yeah,
Speaker 3: he's coming out from the sea. So it was making
Speaker 3: me at least scratch my head wondering what is the
Speaker 3: symbolism a new empire? What new empire are we talking
Speaker 3: about America?
Speaker 5: Probably not, well could it could be.
Speaker 3: It's in the exception of our country. So these people
Speaker 3: were creating you're creating us for a freaking reason.
Speaker 5: So no, gun, I'm with you.
Speaker 3: So the end of World War One, like I said before,
Speaker 3: they always have rituals, the eleventh month, eleventh day, eleventh hour,
Speaker 3: that is three times eleven equals Masonic thirty three. So
Speaker 3: again that's affiliated with America. That's when when we ended,
Speaker 3: when we went over there, we helped end it again
Speaker 3: world War two. When did we help end it? It
Speaker 3: was on the sixth day, six month, six am in
Speaker 3: the morning, even though a lot of guys are saying,
Speaker 3: we need to go probably a three or four, because
Speaker 3: then we could use the cover of darkness, get up
Speaker 3: even closer as opposed to let them seeing us, right,
Speaker 3: and for first you know, breaking dawn. Nope, No, we're
Speaker 3: gonna go exactly at six am, and we launched these things.
Speaker 3: Get there about what six six oh five, six ten,
Speaker 3: and get shot to pieces. I don't know, It's just
Speaker 3: a little something like why why are we so meticulously
Speaker 3: with the numbers and dates? And why is it always
Speaker 3: affiliated with America? Again, where did nine to eleven happen?
Speaker 3: Was it in France? Was it in London? No, it
Speaker 3: was in America, in New York, which again Scottish York. Right,
Speaker 3: there's gotta be something there, I'm I'm sure of it.
Speaker 3: So in the US Capitol as an obelisk behind the
Speaker 3: back of the photographer and the Washington, DC Monument also
Speaker 3: from Rome adopted from my Satanic Egypt. Understand the path
Speaker 3: from Egypt to Babylon to mystery Babylon. You notice the
Speaker 3: similarities between the Vatican and or the White House yep
Speaker 3: on screen here if you're seeing visually, understand the symbology,
Speaker 3: and you will understand the darkness within on our very
Speaker 3: home soil and within churches. We, as idolized leaders and preachers,
Speaker 3: lead the sheep to the slaughter, right into the very darkness.
Speaker 3: Christ ransomed Us from with his own blood, luring many
Speaker 3: to partake in the forbidden, unholy alliance with darkness warned
Speaker 3: of in Revelation. Daniel and his three friends understood the
Speaker 3: deliberate trap set for them. Likewise, we can end the
Speaker 3: remnant discern the world ensnarement by grace with oil in
Speaker 3: their lamps, which is discernment fuel for the lamp, for
Speaker 3: the flame and the dark. So not only in the
Speaker 3: United States capital built according to Roman architecture, but also
Speaker 3: contains the God of Rome, the Queen of Heaven correctly
Speaker 3: with the Virgin Mary was it aster ta Astroots and
Speaker 3: Mariamus and Rudd's wife Mom as the popes and Rome
Speaker 3: Catholics revere to her know how the fifty dollars text
Speaker 3: has strategically placed beside this abominal statue also other Queen
Speaker 3: of Heaven's statues within the United States Capital and God
Speaker 3: aka Queen of the Heaven we trust. Wow.
Speaker 4: Okay, Now, I didn't know that that was who that
Speaker 4: was supposed to be up top.
Speaker 5: I thought that was a Native American, to be honest
Speaker 5: with you.
Speaker 3: Yeah right, And that's just the thing is a lot
Speaker 3: of us have no idea that they're literally showing us
Speaker 3: all the time on our money.
Speaker 5: Yeah what Oh no, No, I saw that all the time.
Speaker 5: When I lived in DC.
Speaker 4: We ran by the Capitol Building at least once a
Speaker 4: week as a platoon, and like, I got a lot
Speaker 4: of good looks at that thing, And I honestly never
Speaker 4: thought to look at what that was.
Speaker 5: Yes, I think they have a mini version of it
Speaker 5: on the inside.
Speaker 4: I know when I went inside the Capitol Building, I
Speaker 4: know there's this little it's like a bust size, but
Speaker 4: it's a full statue of what's up top. But I
Speaker 4: never actually, like meandered over to get a close enough
Speaker 4: look at it to be honest with you, got you, I.
Speaker 5: Am, I don't know.
Speaker 3: But again, if this book is correct, which I highly
Speaker 3: recommend again Tupper's Saucy Rulers of Evil and the other
Speaker 3: one Mysteried Babylon the Great by Edward Hendry. I want
Speaker 3: you to come to your own conclusion. I'm just presenting
Speaker 3: something that made me go huh. I can see it
Speaker 3: with some visuals, you know.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So seven years into his marriage with Henriette Marie, Charles,
Speaker 3: I believe it's Charles Carroll from Virginia, Maryland. They're the
Speaker 3: ones that gave up the parts of Virginia to become Maryland.
Speaker 3: For the capitol, Charles found himself stuck between the personal
Speaker 3: and deadness of ignation and creditors and stingy parliament. In
Speaker 3: hopes of generating tax revenues abroad, he carved a feudal
Speaker 3: barony out of northern Virginia and granted it to Lord Baltimore,
Speaker 3: But Baltimore died before developing the grant, a charter passed
Speaker 3: down to his son, Celias Calvert. Calvert, the new Lord Baltimore,
Speaker 3: called persecuted emigrants desiring religious and tax free freedom. You
Speaker 3: think right to participarly in a voyage to a place
Speaker 3: bearing the name of to Catholics Maryland after the Blessed
Speaker 3: Virgin Baltimore did not neglect appealing to the a religious
Speaker 3: niche as well. A number of advertisements spoke of the
Speaker 3: limitless opportunities of settling in Maryland. On November twenty sixth,
Speaker 3: sixteen thirty three, two ships, the Ark and the Dove,
Speaker 3: which again is symbolic with Noah's arks. Again, these people
Speaker 3: are always very symbolic, set sail from London. Passenger list
Speaker 3: included three Jesuits, sixteen to twenty eight Roman Catholic gentlemen,
Speaker 3: seven hundred predominantly Protestant slaves and laborers. So don't give
Speaker 3: me like ah, you're just noways mean against the Catholics,
Speaker 3: like they got some too clean squeaky themselves, several hundred
Speaker 3: predominantly blah blah blah blah, and Celia's Calvert's brother, Leonard
Speaker 3: Leonard Calvert had been appointed to Maryland's first governor. The
Speaker 3: voyage of the Ark and the Dove was spiritually directed
Speaker 3: by a Jesuit by the name of Andrew White. Educated
Speaker 3: at both Saint Omer's and dou I, a professor for
Speaker 3: twenty years in Portugal, Spain, and Flanders. Andrew White is
Speaker 3: remembered by the church as the Apostle to Maryland. Choosing
Speaker 3: in Andrew for the task was a good literal kabbal
Speaker 3: lah on the part of Jesue. Andrew was the brother
Speaker 3: of the Apostle Peter and the first Pope, and the
Speaker 3: rock upon whom the Roman Catholicism claims to be established.
Speaker 3: Andrew is the patron Saint of Scotland. Scottis shirkwrite. King
Speaker 3: Charles the First was a Scott. A personal or presentative
Speaker 3: representative of the King's brotherly attitude towards Rome could not
Speaker 3: be more eloquently identified than by the simple name Andrew.
Speaker 3: Andrew White consecrated Maryland, and the voyaged to two Catholic saints,
Speaker 3: the Virgin Mary, protect Us of the Jesuits and Ignatius Loyola,
Speaker 3: only recently to Creed, patron Saint of Maryland, the Urban
Speaker 3: the eighth, the second pupil the Jesuits to be elected Pope.
Speaker 3: The ships were nearly four months, finally one hundred and
Speaker 3: twenty three days to England, such and so, and eventually
Speaker 3: they came to the mouth of the Potomac River. It
Speaker 3: was an auspacious day, and not only in March twenty fifth,
Speaker 3: the day of first day of Spring, but it also
Speaker 3: is the first day on the Julian calendar. In seventeen
Speaker 3: fifty two, the colonies would adopt the Gregorian calendar, which
Speaker 3: we follow today. On March twenty fifth, Andrew White read
Speaker 3: for the first Roman mass ever held in the original
Speaker 3: thirteen colonies. Then formerly took possession of the land for
Speaker 3: our Savior and for our Sovereign Lord, King of England. Maryland.
Speaker 3: Historians trace judicial origins of the Roman Catholic Church to
Speaker 3: the United States to Pat Tucksek and Indian chieftains Wi wigwam.
Speaker 5: Ignac came to the colonies.
Speaker 3: No it was. It was consecrated in his name in
Speaker 3: the Virgin Mary.
Speaker 4: Okay, okay, I gonna say, hold on, yeah, missed a
Speaker 4: step Bro okay coo.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, you're not not no, You've been like
Speaker 3: two hundred years. It's like we brought his cash kid
Speaker 3: with us, Like Joseph.
Speaker 4: I about to say, bro, did they like make a
Speaker 4: holy what was it called?
Speaker 5: Not a pardon? What is it when you buy a
Speaker 5: body part of a saint? What's ah?
Speaker 3: I know you're inferring, but I'm not sure what the
Speaker 3: terminology for that such practice as yeah.
Speaker 4: Oh shit, it's on the tip of my tongue too,
Speaker 4: when you buy something to get your family out of
Speaker 4: purgatory for X amount of years, and then the Catholic
Speaker 4: Church is like, hey man, that's that's crazy. You don't
Speaker 4: really need to do that. But like they did it
Speaker 4: for hundreds of years.
Speaker 5: Damn, I can't.
Speaker 4: Think of it anyway anyway, Okay, so let's move on.
Speaker 4: So they consecrated in the name of Ignacious.
Speaker 3: Gottch just in the Virgin Mary. Yes, so justinly Jesuit
Speaker 3: inspired founded fill in the blank. White introduced the Roman
Speaker 3: Catholicism to the tuck sense uh, the anacoustics, and the
Speaker 3: Picca tau ways in real estate that today comprises of
Speaker 3: the District of Columbia. It's quite probable that the that
Speaker 3: the District of Columbia's executive mansion was termed White House
Speaker 3: less because of the color of exterior paint than it
Speaker 3: was for the representative of the Apostle to Maryland. Every
Speaker 3: utterance of white House should fill historically knowledge of the
Speaker 3: Jesuits with pride as the society's achievements.
Speaker 4: Wow, okay, because I mean the first white house wasn't
Speaker 4: exactly white.
Speaker 3: No, but it was another like a black shade. If
Speaker 3: I'm not mistaken, I'd be lying if I told you.
Speaker 4: But I remember learning about how I had to get
Speaker 4: rebuilt after it was set ablaze allegedly threats, And.
Speaker 3: So who knows there could have been inspiration with why
Speaker 3: they needed to be done, because what's what was there?
Speaker 3: Black charcoal, white to be reborn, rebirthed. I don't know,
Speaker 3: but I'm pretty sure that these people aren't dumb dumbs
Speaker 3: with how they do rituals and ceremonies. And again, what
Speaker 3: happened with the Twin Towers. The towers fell so that
Speaker 3: their Phoenix messiah figure can arise, right, Just that's again,
Speaker 3: this is how they're thinking, not me. I'm just telling
Speaker 3: you and explaining textual things because rituals are important to
Speaker 3: these big boys. But in Washington, DC, the original name
Speaker 3: was Rome, Maryland, and a branch of the Potomac River
Speaker 3: was called the Tiber Creek, which was named after the
Speaker 3: Tiber River in Rome. Like Rome, Washington d C has
Speaker 3: seven hills whose names are Capitol Hill, Meridian Hill, Floral Hills,
Speaker 3: Forest Hills, Hillbrook Hillcrest, and Knox Hill, we are or
Speaker 3: how I have been enslaved under ancient Egypt, which spread
Speaker 3: through Babylon, ancient Greece, and the Roman Empire. The Pagan
Speaker 3: Roman Empire never fell, it just changed its name and
Speaker 3: has been hid by infiltrating Christianity.
Speaker 5: Okay, no doubt.
Speaker 3: This is why I always worn with patriotism or becoming
Speaker 3: you know. So when you make patriotism, politics, and war
Speaker 3: part of your creed and identity in Christ, right, you
Speaker 3: have to be very very careful. I'm totally like you
Speaker 3: say before you asked me for I'm totally for defending
Speaker 3: your family, totally for it. You know, if you if
Speaker 3: you no, no, no, you don't hurt me and mind
Speaker 3: me and my own No. But when you have to
Speaker 3: have the government affiliated with that protection concept, no, Yeah,
Speaker 3: there's the government ever cared for us.
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 3: Look at our food, look at our skies, look at
Speaker 3: what they're doing other water, look at haleen fill in
Speaker 3: blank with whatever you want with that. I'm just saying,
Speaker 3: does it really sound like the government gives a crap
Speaker 3: about us? No?
Speaker 5: But they're recruiting the hell out of people.
Speaker 4: Right now, and you know, we're getting ready to go
Speaker 4: to war like real life because and ah, unpopular opinion,
Speaker 4: But you look at the demographics of the type of
Speaker 4: recruitment videos that you see, right, and just just bear
Speaker 4: with me. Remember those cartoons of a I have two
Speaker 4: moms and that's why I'm a good radar technician for
Speaker 4: the US Army.
Speaker 5: No, but there was this. There was like four.
Speaker 4: Little cartoons that were made and they were like two
Speaker 4: minutes long, and they were made to try to be
Speaker 4: recruiting ads for the army. Near a little animations of
Speaker 4: these kids and where they come from and how joining
Speaker 4: the army was like the best decision they ever made
Speaker 4: or somehow because they came from such crazy backgrounds have
Speaker 4: made them better at their job.
Speaker 5: Whatever. One of them was like, I'm Emily and I
Speaker 5: have two moms.
Speaker 4: Long story short, US Army And that was basically the
Speaker 4: entire commercial. There was nothing of real substance. It got
Speaker 4: plastered by the entire veteran and currently serving military communities,
Speaker 4: being a giant waste of money and all of that. Right,
Speaker 4: those are the types of commercials that you'll see when
Speaker 4: America is at peace.
Speaker 5: We don't do that very well.
Speaker 4: We've only done that for like what ten years collectively
Speaker 4: in our entire history, So.
Speaker 5: Like we're a warring nation.
Speaker 4: We're a tribe that likes to go and fight people
Speaker 4: for no other reason than it's our It's our thing, right.
Speaker 3: Funk and squash.
Speaker 4: So whenever you see the commercials going out right now,
Speaker 4: and it's typically white people, like white dudes on the
Speaker 4: recruiting ads, it's like they're trying to reach the vast
Speaker 4: majority of people and they need numbers now. So I'm
Speaker 4: just saying America realistically might be getting ready to enter
Speaker 4: a war.
Speaker 5: That's a real thing.
Speaker 3: Oh No, And that aspect, I'm aware. And like I
Speaker 3: said before in the Game night, most of my peers
Speaker 3: are under five to ten years range, maybe eight, totally
Speaker 3: clueless about names, terminology, but they all still think Ben
Speaker 3: Shapiro's the Bee's knees. And I'm like, guys, this is
Speaker 3: you're just brainwashed little merks and uniform that they're just
Speaker 3: going again. And that's what I pity about them is
Speaker 3: that at least know why you're fighting, but most of
Speaker 3: them don't, and they're just they're throwing them in there
Speaker 3: and saying, here you go, and here's a couple of
Speaker 3: medals for thanks for doing what I needed. You to do.
Speaker 3: I mean it's it's literally gladiators just put through like
Speaker 3: a more rigorous line of training, and they sugarcoat is
Speaker 3: saying you did it for your people.
Speaker 4: Hey man, As a veteran, I gotta say, we need us.
Speaker 4: We need people that are willing to go do bad
Speaker 4: things to.
Speaker 3: Bad warriors, but not soldiers. That's that's the difference. And
Speaker 3: they they've they've morphed and bastardized what it was to
Speaker 3: be a protector, you know, because can you still protect
Speaker 3: your tribal grounds? Yeah? Can you still protect your loved
Speaker 3: ones and your home? Yeah. But that's where I again
Speaker 3: I would diehard state. I'm more so of the mindset,
Speaker 3: like I said before, tribal libertarianism, where we're we're staying
Speaker 3: on our turf. You come on my turf, we're going
Speaker 3: to have a problem. You want to barter in trade,
Speaker 3: We're good. You want to cause a problem, We're coming
Speaker 3: for you.
Speaker 5: So let me let me ask you this on that thought.
Speaker 4: For you as a philosophical question, we were you know,
Speaker 4: we're just doing what we do with time tonight whatever,
Speaker 4: fuck it, So real things. Do you believe in preemptive
Speaker 4: strikes as a way to protect you before the strike,
Speaker 4: before the threat actually happens. Let me give you a
Speaker 4: just a contrived hypothetical example in the tribal liberty Harry
Speaker 4: and mindset here, okay, right right, not nationalism, takeaway flags.
Speaker 5: We're talking about.
Speaker 4: Like and not like full on like living off the
Speaker 4: land tribes, like within the realm of semi civilization. Right, Okay,
Speaker 4: if we know for a fact that like three tribes
Speaker 4: over they hate us, we don't know exactly what they're
Speaker 4: up to, but we know that they do not like us,
Speaker 4: and we think, we have a lot of suspicion, we
Speaker 4: have a lot of evidence, and then boom, we have
Speaker 4: proof that they are trying to do something to hurt us.
Speaker 4: Do you agree with us stopping that and like not
Speaker 4: necessarily full force invading to some degree of stopping it,
Speaker 4: maybe a drone strike, whatever, But do you agree with
Speaker 4: attacking a nation or a tribe before they attack your tribe?
Speaker 3: I would definitely set up ambush and parameters of preemptive
Speaker 3: Like again, I wouldn't necessarily start because I do hold
Speaker 3: a little bit to the credence as future is gun
Speaker 3: first it was self defense or they started marching the
Speaker 3: minute you cross that border. You know where that borderline
Speaker 3: is and the minute you crossed it. I don't need
Speaker 3: to second guess your your intentions if you have weaponry
Speaker 3: of any sorts in your possession, and especially if I
Speaker 3: have pre meditative intel. But I wouldn't say that I
Speaker 3: would be the one that instigates it, because personally speaking,
Speaker 3: I like to negotiate as much as possible before we start,
Speaker 3: you know, flowing things and swinging things at each other.
Speaker 4: Of course, diplomatic means is always the better means by
Speaker 4: all fix.
Speaker 3: Sun Zeus said, if you could avoid the fight, do
Speaker 3: so by all means. So even again, even if it
Speaker 3: was something like humiliating the crap out of them, That's
Speaker 3: what I would do. If I had to go Vietnam
Speaker 3: style and go guerrilla warfare as your or scorched dirt
Speaker 3: as you're coming into my territory, I'm down with that too. Again,
Speaker 3: this is the most extreme. I would not want that.
Speaker 3: But at the same time, I also think in a
Speaker 3: strategy might.
Speaker 4: Say so, That's what I'm saying, like a pre for example,
Speaker 4: the Gaza situation, right if Israel. That's why I've always said,
Speaker 4: like people think net and Yahoo is innocent on that
Speaker 4: he's like the good guy. It's like, bro, you understand,
Speaker 4: Mossad saw them amassing troops and weapons and gear, fucking
Speaker 4: paragliders and shit. Moussad saw all of that and allowed
Speaker 4: it to happen.
Speaker 5: They could have stopped it.
Speaker 4: This is allegedly the best intelligence agency on the face
Speaker 4: of the Earth period hard stop period, allegedly, if we're
Speaker 4: to believe every source ever right, and somehow they just
Speaker 4: missed and got fifteen hundred people killed and captured in hostages.
Speaker 4: In this whole situation, they could have, hypothetically, when the
Speaker 4: troops a mass and like we're about to step off
Speaker 4: into Israel, they could have drone striked all of them
Speaker 4: and ended the situation.
Speaker 5: But the world would.
Speaker 4: Have lit them up and said, look at them bombing
Speaker 4: these peaceful protesters who are gathering within their rights. Israel
Speaker 4: is the back about. There's whole things about what would
Speaker 4: have happened next. But my point is they could have
Speaker 4: preemptively struck, and as a person with a logical mindset,
Speaker 4: I actually would agree with that, But you would need proof,
Speaker 4: not suspicion, that things were happening, you know.
Speaker 3: What I mean. Even with that, they already predicted it
Speaker 3: back and what was it twenty twelve thirteen on the
Speaker 3: Economics magazine. Yeah, it was. Again, they probably have people
Speaker 3: in charge at the top of himos on that end,
Speaker 3: and I'm not denouncing that. But at the same time,
Speaker 3: you have to understand a lot of the recruits. You
Speaker 3: killed mom and Dad. Somebody comes over and says, hey, son,
Speaker 3: do you want to join the rebellion. Of course you're
Speaker 3: going to say yes, whether you understand the degrees of
Speaker 3: who controls what, You're just gonna say, heck, yeah, they
Speaker 3: killed mom and Dad. I'll join whatever is going to liberate.
Speaker 3: And again, you create your own boogeyman by controlling the opposition,
Speaker 3: which is exactly like I've been saying. With its founding
Speaker 3: of America, he created the Americans to get paranoid and
Speaker 3: to be reactive. So go shoot redcoat and we'll let
Speaker 3: you think that you're getting your own freedom for this, right.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So I'm not saying that yes or no, but I'm
Speaker 3: saying you get the sentiments riled up enough, you're oppressed,
Speaker 3: and of course you'll join any faction that says we're
Speaker 3: here to fix that problem for you.
Speaker 4: My thing is, dude in the same way that these
Speaker 4: people will like die on their hill of an opinion
Speaker 4: when they don't actually know the facts. Is the same
Speaker 4: way that I tell people about joining the military, even
Speaker 4: as a veteran, as a post nine to eleven veteran
Speaker 4: who joined the infantry and then ended up not seeing
Speaker 4: combat and the whole thing that goes into being a
Speaker 4: part of it during wartime and all of that.
Speaker 5: I tell people, if you're gonna join the military, let
Speaker 5: it be for.
Speaker 4: A purpose that you truly believe in, and don't let
Speaker 4: it be because of the red, watten blue.
Speaker 5: Like okay, yes that there, that is gonna be there.
Speaker 6: If you're going like okay, if you're going for job training,
Speaker 6: like you want to get into nuclear programs, you want
Speaker 6: to join the Navy to serve on a nuclear sub
Speaker 6: and like you have a plan of course of action.
Speaker 4: You want to use the GI bill to go to
Speaker 4: college and your military training might play into it.
Speaker 5: Blah blah blah. Okay, that's a plan you have, that's
Speaker 5: a goal you have. You have a whole track that
Speaker 5: you're trying to hit.
Speaker 4: Yeah, if you are joining to join the infantry and
Speaker 4: go fight and do that, let it be for something
Speaker 4: that you personally believe in.
Speaker 5: I have no issue with that.
Speaker 4: Whether I agree or disagree with what that reason may be,
Speaker 4: that's individual to individual. I'm not here to judge anybody.
Speaker 4: All I'm saying is, if you are willing to literally
Speaker 4: die on a hill, let it be a hill that
Speaker 4: you truly believe you belong on, That's all, And take
Speaker 4: that with whatever grain as salt you want. I'm not
Speaker 4: that's not coming at anybody. That's more or less just
Speaker 4: seeing it for what it is.
Speaker 3: You know, I could agree with a lot of that,
Speaker 3: a lot of that, and like.
Speaker 4: The same way with these people that are like dying
Speaker 4: on these opinion based hills when they don't know any
Speaker 4: of the facts behind it. Like, dude, if you're gonna
Speaker 4: stand here and dig your heels in and like browbeat
Speaker 4: somebody ab outside, like can you at least know, like
Speaker 4: within one to two levels of sifting through the bullshit
Speaker 4: meter about any of the things you're talking about. It's
Speaker 4: that kind of shit, you know. It's like, if you're
Speaker 4: gonna be this way, could it be something that you
Speaker 4: truly believe in rather than something you're doing just because
Speaker 4: it's a thing.
Speaker 3: To do where the government told you or that's the
Speaker 3: narrative of the day. Yeah exactly, yeah, yeah, And that's
Speaker 3: what I'm saying with the tribal Again, all the men
Speaker 3: are present in the meeting. It's not we sent in
Speaker 3: a couple of guys and I's like, no, every single
Speaker 3: person is in this wigwam to have the pow wow
Speaker 3: and ask the question do you guys think this is
Speaker 3: the good idea to go because like, again I'm somebody
Speaker 3: in liberal New England, right, you came up here and yeah,
Speaker 3: you've had democrats I think last twenty years has been
Speaker 3: Murphy and what's his face? It's we don't have anybody
Speaker 3: representing the Republican aspect of our areas. So am I
Speaker 3: being honestly representative?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 3: Does my state look good to those who are always
Speaker 3: bashing on liberties? No, But that's the thing. It's orchestrated
Speaker 3: in such a way that, no, we're never heard, So
Speaker 3: don't say you're the voice of the people. That's why again,
Speaker 3: tribal is saying, every man has a chance to come
Speaker 3: up here, everybody to speak to the elder or the
Speaker 3: one chief. And again the chief is only there because
Speaker 3: of his age, not because of you know, everybody casts
Speaker 3: a vote on one particular thing. He's there because of
Speaker 3: his age, he's respected, he has a good record front
Speaker 3: he was a young little papoose and now he has
Speaker 3: freaking chief, so we respect that. You know.
Speaker 4: Let me ask you this, Do you at least agree
Speaker 4: with the fact that while everybody's voice should be heard,
Speaker 4: that it certain people might have How can I put
Speaker 4: this basically? Like, should the warriors speak on behalf of
Speaker 4: the wars that the tribal fight? Like specifically they should
Speaker 4: because they're the ones that will be fighting it kind
Speaker 4: of thing. I would feel like not everybody's voice.
Speaker 5: Should be heard at the war council, so to speak.
Speaker 3: I would say that they have a fair amount to
Speaker 3: say yes, because it's going to be their blood that shed,
Speaker 3: it's going to be their energy that's going to be utilized,
Speaker 3: and whatever outcome is going to happen. Again, I'm just
Speaker 3: speaking hypothetically totally from people I know they might sound.
Speaker 3: It's out of this realm. People are living off great
Speaker 3: for crying out loud. I'm just saying if we had
Speaker 3: to orchestrate something, because if you're looking in the Bible,
Speaker 3: there wasn't a necessity for a king because you had
Speaker 3: connection with your creator God. Now whether or not, I'm
Speaker 3: not going to go into any crazy thing, but a
Speaker 3: lot of them are saying the Great Spirit. At least
Speaker 3: they're acknowledging God because they didn't have you know, as
Speaker 3: far as I know, as far as I know, statutes
Speaker 3: and whatnot, they were respecting at least there's a creator
Speaker 3: out there that made all of this. We're not even
Speaker 3: doing that with a lot of modern America. We're just going, well,
Speaker 3: it doesn't I don't give a crap where I come from,
Speaker 3: where I go, I'm just going to do, you know,
Speaker 3: because my government tails me to and I love this
Speaker 3: more than anything. It's like, if you think that you
Speaker 3: need to kill or shed blood in order to be something,
Speaker 3: you're probably a religious nut or patriot or something of that.
Speaker 3: Like you need to kill order to be something, Whereas
Speaker 3: in Christianity, I'm willing to die for what I believe,
Speaker 3: and that again, when the tribal aspect, I would Again,
Speaker 3: I'm not going to make it a theocracy. But as
Speaker 3: I said before, as for me and my house, we
Speaker 3: will serve the Lord. And if everybody is serving the
Speaker 3: Lord truly as the Holy as the body of Christ,
Speaker 3: then you wouldn't need to be forcing it on anybody.
Speaker 3: You would again, you would be seeking the Holy Spirit's will.
Speaker 3: Should we go to war against the Philistines tomorrow, Gideon,
Speaker 3: put your knowing, your your white little tunic out in
Speaker 3: the lawn and see what we get tomorrow morning, if
Speaker 3: you got due on it or not. You know that
Speaker 3: kind of mentality is like, we're seeking what He truly
Speaker 3: would want in this situation. Yep, I'll with you so again,
Speaker 3: it doesn't mean I'm right. You can have a totally disagreement,
Speaker 3: write a bad review. I don't care. It's just one
Speaker 3: person throwing out something big dog.
Speaker 5: This is.
Speaker 4: This is a completely opinion based sharing of ideas.
Speaker 3: Here.
Speaker 5: There's no hatred or shade throwing one way or another.
Speaker 5: We all hear.
Speaker 3: Appreciate that no doubt. Beginning of seventy nine, a survey
Speaker 3: party placed stones marking the boundary of the District of Columbia,
Speaker 3: one mile apart in a diamond pattern ten miles on
Speaker 3: a side. Two thirds of the land came from Maryland
Speaker 3: and the two thirds from Virginia. This land formed the
Speaker 3: new capital of the United States of America, and, ironically enough,
Speaker 3: ancient religion of Babylon all have one thing in common,
Speaker 3: the sacred feminine. Do we not notice a rise in
Speaker 3: feminism in our culture? I don't need a man because
Speaker 3: a man is supposed to be over his wife. And
Speaker 3: so I said men, And I'm not dousing anything about
Speaker 3: a woman. What I'm saying is that men were going
Speaker 3: to try to think, not with the feminist perspective impulsively
Speaker 3: with our emotions. We're going to try to rationalize. Can
Speaker 3: we talk about this? Do we need to use physicality?
Speaker 3: Do it again? I'm not demeaning it. I'm supporting by idinity.
Speaker 5: You tiptoeing, dude, You tipped on that line. The female
Speaker 5: coll members is gonna feel some type of way.
Speaker 3: No, If anything, this is the thing is that if
Speaker 3: the man is truly leading, you're giving him the incentive
Speaker 3: to want to actually be a provider. You are giving
Speaker 3: him the incentive to want to be your protector and provisioner,
Speaker 3: to say we're equals. Okay, So now he's over here
Speaker 3: saying well, I don't have to do anything. Then so
Speaker 3: then you get that man in contrast, well, yeah, that's
Speaker 3: your job, that's your chore, as opposed to I respect you,
Speaker 3: and if I feel so led and I have some downtime.
Speaker 3: I'm willing to come over and help you out because
Speaker 3: I see how hard you work, and I appreciate what
Speaker 3: you do around the house. I respect what you do
Speaker 3: around the house. I think you're great with the kids.
Speaker 3: I am respecting her domain, you know what I'm saying,
Speaker 3: And I am elevating and I'm going to brag about that.
Speaker 3: I'm going to amplify and cultivate that. Whenever I'm with
Speaker 3: my buddies, I'm going to brag about how cool she
Speaker 3: is in that field. Right. I think that's great if
Speaker 3: you think that a guy complimenting you or you know,
Speaker 3: the coming out from quotea que his realm, his responsibility,
Speaker 3: his world, and he's coming over to your and saying,
Speaker 3: I really appreciate you bringing some balance and stability when
Speaker 3: I come home at the end of the day, because
Speaker 3: it's a crappy, ugly world out there. When I say
Speaker 3: you're beautiful, I mean you're one of the most best
Speaker 3: things I've ever seen in this world, and I'm glad
Speaker 3: to have you as my partner in my life.
Speaker 4: I'm just saying the classic look at the couple in
Speaker 4: the classic look at what a household should be man.
Speaker 3: That is, it's a beautiful thing. But again do I
Speaker 3: say yes, And that's because of this movement, that's what
Speaker 3: I call it. But feminist Christianity we're being we're thinking, well,
Speaker 3: I don't do it for those reasons. God knows my heart.
Speaker 3: And we're doing all this pagan practices. We don't know
Speaker 3: why we're doing them. And when somebody's trying to explain
Speaker 3: it to you, right, and I'm not trying to bash,
Speaker 3: break your arm, twist you point you at the end
Speaker 3: of a sort. No, what I'm saying is this is
Speaker 3: something that grieves God's heart and I'm showing you directly
Speaker 3: the source of where it comes from. And you're getting
Speaker 3: mad at me. Why because you're responding emotionally. A Christian
Speaker 3: should be convicted, not triggered. I'm just saying. And if
Speaker 3: that is making you upset, I might say, you're more
Speaker 3: in love with the world than you are with what
Speaker 3: you should be prioritizing.
Speaker 4: WHOA So man, it's not all right. So you're not
Speaker 4: being misogynistic, but a lot of people will say that
Speaker 4: you are. You are being a traditionalist and that is
Speaker 4: not at right, which is not something that you away
Speaker 4: from at all.
Speaker 3: Accept it, and I am advocating one hundred percent. Again,
Speaker 3: do I want the woman to know all the ugliness
Speaker 3: in the world. No. And let's be honest. If I
Speaker 3: brought up conspiracy theories every time I go on a
Speaker 3: date as opposed to being fun, kickback and relaxing, Let's
Speaker 3: be statistically real, here are most of them going to
Speaker 3: appreciate that you.
Speaker 4: Really should start bringing up conspiracies on dates. As a
Speaker 4: matter of fact, that's a pretty good litmus test.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna be up with you.
Speaker 3: And again, you have to test the waters. But I
Speaker 3: have to be honest though the majority m there's a
Speaker 3: fair amount. Again, I've been dating. I'm not just spitting
Speaker 3: this ball in this No, No, and I I don't
Speaker 3: know at all. I'm saying statistically though a lot of
Speaker 3: them don't want to know, right. And again, I'm not
Speaker 3: saying treat them like a child.
Speaker 4: No, no, no, But I'm saying we gotta be evenly yoked.
Speaker 4: We have to be evenly yoked with our partner. I
Speaker 4: need them to be on the same mental wavelength as me,
Speaker 4: meaning I need them to be aware of the same
Speaker 4: world that I'm in. You know what, I mean, because
Speaker 4: I need to know if I'm out doing something, are
Speaker 4: you willing to pull a gun on somebody? I need
Speaker 4: to know that she has that type of energy, otherwise
Speaker 4: I don't fucking want it, dude, Like if somebody was
Speaker 4: trying to attack my kids, are you willing to end
Speaker 4: a life today like that? Right off top? Because I
Speaker 4: know everybody's got different priorities. Right when you have kids,
Speaker 4: things shift, perspective shift, and all of that. But and
Speaker 4: I may I'm not all about it in that same regard,
Speaker 4: But at the same time, I take the evenly yoked
Speaker 4: aspect to all levels, Like yo, I make equal amount
Speaker 4: of dishes, I make equal amount of laundry, And at
Speaker 4: the end of the day, it's like who was home
Speaker 4: to do it? More of the hours of the day today,
Speaker 4: who was here that could have done that task, regardless
Speaker 4: of the gender role on that. But again that comes
Speaker 4: more out of a necessity because we have such active
Speaker 4: lives and active kids, and boom boom boom every hour
Speaker 4: is some new task, activity or this or that. So
Speaker 4: it's more like just trying to make it fucking happen
Speaker 4: more often than not. And so and I'll say that too,
Speaker 4: and the relationship that you're describing is not a bad one.
Speaker 4: But I've also seen so a bunch of successful ones
Speaker 4: where the man did the man role in certain regards,
Speaker 4: but like the woman was the breadwinner.
Speaker 5: But that's not how they operated at home.
Speaker 4: At home was at home, and like they had their relationship,
Speaker 4: they had their dynamics, their kids understood who was who
Speaker 4: and what was what, and like all of that.
Speaker 3: It just.
Speaker 4: People take that and they run with it in a
Speaker 4: million different directions.
Speaker 3: You know what I mean, need too, because exactly what
Speaker 3: I'm implying is you want to know who's the man
Speaker 3: right when it's a men's sport. You want to know
Speaker 3: who the men are right.
Speaker 4: Well, wait a minute, now, men can have periods. Now,
Speaker 4: this is twenty twenty four allegedly.
Speaker 3: What I'm saying, But it's like we gave it inch
Speaker 3: and now they're going a mile and what they do
Speaker 3: As a traditionalist, you want real conservative. I'm conserving something here,
Speaker 3: and I'm telling you there is value in what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: I'm not just demeaning. I am literally saying I am
Speaker 3: elevating the title and role that God is instituted upon you.
Speaker 3: And I am like I said, I think that's something
Speaker 3: that should be honored, like a prop thirty one woman.
Speaker 3: I am going to brag about that. If again, why
Speaker 3: because you are literally everything that a guy dreams about
Speaker 3: in mostly and again I'm saying for our culture, there's
Speaker 3: a lot of women out there that are over here
Speaker 3: not even emulating a little bit of that, a little
Speaker 3: bit of.
Speaker 4: That Proverbs thirty one woman. That's a phrase I haven't
Speaker 4: heard in the hotman. I'm gonna be honest.
Speaker 5: I mean, you see her in church all the time, dude,
Speaker 5: youth grove.
Speaker 4: That was a whole That was a whole sermon at
Speaker 4: least once every six month. Yeah, talking about just to
Speaker 4: the women out there to be a proverb thirty one Damn, dude,
Speaker 4: that was. That's a deep cut. Only kids that grew
Speaker 4: up in the church know that one off time.
Speaker 5: That was solid.
Speaker 3: Hey, people look it up. It's not a bad thing.
Speaker 3: And again, like I said, I say it in total respect.
Speaker 3: But again, does it sound kind of crazy, Yeah, because
Speaker 3: we've been that much deluded by intention Anyways, the sacred
Speaker 3: feminine she leads people to the light, the false light
Speaker 3: of Lucifer. So again, horror of Babylon. It is not
Speaker 3: real Christianity. It's a whore, which is a false lover.
Speaker 3: You're taking it for lust, You're taking it not for love,
Speaker 3: You're not investing for the right reasons. And this could
Speaker 3: be equivalents of the Virgin Mary, who's known as the
Speaker 3: Queen of the heavens. Again, this is I think nineteen
Speaker 3: fifty two to fifty four or maybe fifty six, the
Speaker 3: Catholic Church officiated that in October it was the month,
Speaker 3: and then Ishtar was known as the Queen of the heavens.
Speaker 3: So the Babylonians Tara, and Buddhism Sophia Shakti, and Hinduism
Speaker 3: Shekhannah in Kabbalah and Fatima in Islam. Okay, oh, and
Speaker 3: again you'll notice crescent moons are frequently affiliated with these
Speaker 3: particular groups as well. Look over here the three places,
Speaker 3: and I was noticing. You have the city of London,
Speaker 3: which again bankers money monetary. You have Washington, d c.
Speaker 3: Again not part of America, and then you have the Vatican.
Speaker 3: And I was noticing, I was noticing a little bit
Speaker 3: of every aspect. One is worshiping the Virgin Mary, one
Speaker 3: is celebrating money hermes. Again, one of tamous I'm just saying.
Speaker 3: In the Greek and then Washington d C. We're known
Speaker 3: as a what did you just say, we are a
Speaker 3: war country and was known as a god of war
Speaker 3: or you know, he was the guy when they came
Speaker 3: down from the plains of Shinar. He would unite all
Speaker 3: the cities by the sword. That's kind of what we're
Speaker 3: doing by the sword, cannon or gun or fill in
Speaker 3: blank of huge weapons. But as we already know, I
Speaker 3: don't have to touch too much on this. But again,
Speaker 3: they have the owl on our money. When you look
Speaker 3: at Washington d C. You have in the chest region
Speaker 3: of the owl on the outline of a map. It
Speaker 3: is the owl that we see in Bohemian grove.
Speaker 5: Yep. Absolutely, that'd be Molock, which Minerva depending on which story.
Speaker 4: I've seen some that say that this was Athena's, the
Speaker 4: Greek goddess of wisdom. This was her animal that would
Speaker 4: like give her the knowledge at night and all these things.
Speaker 5: Then there's either way you look at it. Molock.
Speaker 4: The name goes back farther than ancient Greece. This goes
Speaker 4: back to the Phoenicians and the Canaanites. Correct, And if
Speaker 4: you want to look at where it got into when
Speaker 4: it became him owl and that's its own fascinating twist.
Speaker 5: It really is worth a google everybody.
Speaker 3: Yes, and this is part of the origins as well. Shoot,
Speaker 3: it's brought to Drew bluck word.
Speaker 5: Never mind that a care picture, bro. That is iconic too,
Speaker 5: isn't it? Which one the bohemian growth.
Speaker 4: That's a cremation of care they do every year when
Speaker 4: they start the ceremonies.
Speaker 3: Yes, and again an aspect of Bayel worship filling the blanks.
Speaker 3: Druids took over after Babbel. As I've explained to other shows,
Speaker 3: especially The King of the U's or Lord of the Stars.
Speaker 3: I'm showing the migrational aspect of see this, see this
Speaker 3: compare contrast, and I'm showing you how it's migrating. Yeah.
Speaker 3: The biggest excuse me, the biggest thing that I noted
Speaker 3: was the pentagram for the US, the United States Capital
Speaker 3: And where is the tip of it pointing towards the
Speaker 3: baphomet head pointing to the mouth of what of the
Speaker 3: White House?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Now, what does it say about the beast in revelation?
Speaker 5: I mean this says a lot. Which thing in particular.
Speaker 3: True that the little horn.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, ten horns raised from excuse me, yeah, seven heads,
Speaker 4: ten horns raised from it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and then the little horn that came out. Now
Speaker 3: here's the thing. America is pretty baby on the scale, right,
Speaker 3: It's like two hundred and forty eight, two hundred and
Speaker 3: forty seven years, give or take.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we're like in our early teenage years as so
Speaker 4: far as all of that goes.
Speaker 3: And ironically, Trump's name prior to becoming Trump was drump
Speaker 3: which means horn or trumpet player.
Speaker 5: Okay, yeah, when or not.
Speaker 3: That has anything to do with it, But I find
Speaker 3: it again interesting with nine to eleven that nine to
Speaker 3: eleven was during the feast of trumpets, and it's alleged
Speaker 3: that that was the day that Christ was born, and
Speaker 3: it has a symbology to connecting to Jerich Jericho with
Speaker 3: the walls coming down, they blew their trumpets. Christ returns
Speaker 3: at the sound of trumpets. And if Christ's name it
Speaker 3: wasn't Jesus, let's say it was Yeshua, which means God
Speaker 3: is deliverance. So I think that would check out. And
Speaker 3: Joshua's name, you know, yes, you had Jeshua. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 3: So if that is true and he was born on
Speaker 3: nine to eleven, which was coronation day for kings in
Speaker 3: ancient Israel, which I'm shit saying.
Speaker 4: There have been more than a few people that have
Speaker 4: said that Jesus was actually born on nine to eleven.
Speaker 4: We've had actually a few guests break it down from
Speaker 4: the year from stars, they broke it down from seasonal
Speaker 4: patterns of greezing.
Speaker 5: And all the like. There's different ways of looking at it.
Speaker 4: I was under the assumption that was actually more spring
Speaker 4: to summertime frame, but we're hearing more people say it
Speaker 4: might have been more towards summer to fall time frame.
Speaker 5: So okay, I'm.
Speaker 3: Just saying, if that's the start of the year, and
Speaker 3: it does connect with, you know, the second atom, because
Speaker 3: allegedly where he built, where he made Adam was where
Speaker 3: they built the temple, and the second atom tears the
Speaker 3: temple veil upon his last breath. I'm just saying, there's
Speaker 3: something there. Well we all know this on this side
Speaker 3: of the realm, probably not, but there's there's something there.
Speaker 3: And also, the Washington Monument is exactly six six hundred
Speaker 3: and sixty feet inches tall and six hundred and sixty
Speaker 3: six inches wide. Yeah, yeah, And currently patriotic Protestant Christians
Speaker 3: are laying their hands on Washington DC obelisk during a
Speaker 3: recent prayer gathering for Israel, Trump and the USA.
Speaker 5: Do they know that's a giant stone fallus?
Speaker 4: Nope, but that are touching a giant stone dick in
Speaker 4: their brons.
Speaker 3: To be precise, and considering Nimrod's name or to movese
Speaker 3: his son regenerated Nimrod quote unquote, and they're thinking it
Speaker 3: means bail, which is Lord, owner and master, and we
Speaker 3: hostly have Lord in the Bible. So are they intentionally
Speaker 3: deluding the concept of what we deem as God? Create
Speaker 3: God in your own image, which is ultimately what Satanism
Speaker 3: is is you could become like your own God. So
Speaker 3: we'll help you get to that point. You just have
Speaker 3: to we have to break you down mentally to accept
Speaker 3: this ideology, to do as thou wilt, right, I'm witch,
Speaker 3: but yeah, this is what they're doing.
Speaker 4: I still can't get over the Christians all laying their
Speaker 4: hands on a giant stone. Dick's just I mean, like
Speaker 4: the jokes right themselves. And I mean it's even if
Speaker 4: they didn't know that that was supposed to be Nimrod's dick. Like,
Speaker 4: all right, every teenager slash early twenty year old that
Speaker 4: goes to DC does this stupid thing where like you
Speaker 4: act like you're leaning on it or whatever. You take
Speaker 4: a picture and then you do the thing where you
Speaker 4: lay down and you act like it's your boner. That
Speaker 4: is a normal thing that pretty much everyone does, because
Speaker 4: people are stupid when they're young.
Speaker 5: Okay, all of these people that.
Speaker 4: Are Christians, like, it's not like you're meeting around the flagpole,
Speaker 4: which is also a thing in its own regard.
Speaker 5: But like, right, bro, the's a dick. That's great. Oh
Speaker 5: my god, I love this country. Sometimes people people are wild.
Speaker 3: Again, this is this is the greatest thing. Forgive them, father,
Speaker 3: for they know not what they do. That is in
Speaker 3: essence most of and I'm saying quotation marks Christianity. They
Speaker 3: do not. Like again, what is paganism, Well that's satanism?
Speaker 3: Well what satanism? You don't know, do you? You literally don't know.
Speaker 3: But you always judge everybody. You're always self righteous. You
Speaker 3: bash everybody, but you have no context or argument to
Speaker 3: bring to the table. And when somebody does, oh you're
Speaker 3: wrong about that, or I don't do it for those reasons,
Speaker 3: and again, this is what I'm saying, cognitive dissonance does
Speaker 3: not help the Christian walks. As a Christian, you're supposed
Speaker 3: to abstain from the things of this world. And that's
Speaker 3: why people like me, As Jonathan has made note in reviews,
Speaker 3: I'm not well liked because just like the prophets. I'm
Speaker 3: not saying I'm a prophet, but just like them, I'm
Speaker 3: bringing you some information that's making the man upstairs very
Speaker 3: upset with how we're doing things down here. It's breaking
Speaker 3: his heart, it's grieving his heart. And instead of listening
Speaker 3: to what they are pleading you with, you stone them.
Speaker 3: You sow them in half, and you killed them. And
Speaker 3: this is similar to what we get with the parable
Speaker 3: of Christ. He says, I sent you, he was talking about.
Speaker 3: I sent my first servant, You guys got rid of him.
Speaker 3: I sent my second servant, you got rid of him.
Speaker 3: Then I sent my son, and you got rid of him.
Speaker 3: Nothing's ever changed because that was the word made flesh.
Speaker 3: All my word was always spoken. But thus saith the Lord.
Speaker 3: It was inspired by holy men of God that wrote
Speaker 3: the Bible as we did. And God's been divorced So
Speaker 3: if that is the case, when it comes behond human
Speaker 3: flesh and you still deny it, and again if you
Speaker 3: don't understand, why do you do it? And you don't know? Again,
Speaker 3: think about him, No doubt, Ible is a love story.
Speaker 3: I'm putting up with a really crappy relationship because she people,
Speaker 3: my people won't submit to me. You see where I'm
Speaker 3: coming from now. It's mirroring what we have there is
Speaker 3: I'm not submit as an I'm beating you into submission.
Speaker 3: Is submit as in I love you and I want
Speaker 3: to do the most I can. But if we're always
Speaker 3: competing as opposed to sponsoring each other, yeah, we become rivals.
Speaker 3: I want to give one hundred percent in my field,
Speaker 3: and i'd like you to give one hundred in yours.
Speaker 3: If we're only doing fifty to fifty apiece, we're gonna crumble.
Speaker 3: I don't want the fact, right, Yeah, what's better two
Speaker 3: hundred percent or fifty apiece? Yeah, I'm going to two
Speaker 3: hundred percent. I'm sorry, that just sounds way better.
Speaker 5: Absolutely so.
Speaker 3: For Bronianism, I mentioned this earlier. Just going to break
Speaker 3: it down now. The philosophy of von Heythem's book contains
Speaker 3: the formula for administering Protestant America as a bellarminion. As
Speaker 3: we said before, that has a lot of aspects within
Speaker 3: the constitution. Commonwealth for Bronianism calls the decentralization of the
Speaker 3: Roman Catholic Church into independent national churches modeled on the
Speaker 3: Church of England. Because they are ruled directly by kings
Speaker 3: and princes. These churches are more correctly called states Holy Roman.
Speaker 3: We didn't really break off, We just broke off into states,
Speaker 3: which is the church. You look up the root word
Speaker 3: for church. It's frequently affiliated with Pagans. There's a reason
Speaker 3: why Tindell, when he was translating, he always referred to
Speaker 3: Eclesia and he abstained on the only time he called
Speaker 3: out the word church in his translations was when he
Speaker 3: was referring to a pagan temple. Because that connects with
Speaker 3: Helios where we get helocentricism globe Earth from what Dvice
Speaker 3: talks about. That's what I'm saying. So when you understand
Speaker 3: hermeticism and heliocentricism, you will understand the two pin callers
Speaker 3: and why they have a ball atop of one and
Speaker 3: hermeticism aspects of the other. This is the balance between
Speaker 3: Tamuse and Nimrod and what they brought to the world.
Speaker 3: The pope may be the successor to Peter, Prince of
Speaker 3: the Apostles, but under Forbronianism, he has no legal jurisdiction.
Speaker 3: He is merely a principle of unity, a spiritual unifier
Speaker 3: obligated to abide by the degrees of the general councils
Speaker 3: under the leadership of the bishops and their properly enlightened laymen.
Speaker 3: Crucial to for Bronianism application is thorough popular education. Once laymen, bishops,
Speaker 3: and councils are properly enlightened, they will be empowered to
Speaker 3: resist any attempts of the papacy to exert monarchal control
Speaker 3: over the church. Frebronius emphasized that the system will succeed
Speaker 3: only in a milieu of popular enlightenment. His context presumes
Speaker 3: an enlightenment. For Bronianism was a select formula for returning
Speaker 3: to the non Catholic world to the bosom of the church.
Speaker 3: So essentially his formula and ideologies of state, this is
Speaker 3: how we use it in America, and we're going to
Speaker 3: reel them back to the horror of Babylon without them
Speaker 3: even realizing it is essentially what I just read, mais fact.
Speaker 3: The Vatican dramatically condemned the book. Again, what is it? It's
Speaker 3: exposed yourself but at the same time doing exactly what
Speaker 3: you want. It's like I told you not to touch
Speaker 3: the cookies, but specifically, what did you just do? Reverse psychology.
Speaker 3: I now have to touch the cookie. So I'm going
Speaker 3: to condemn it outwardly, but inwardly I kind of prompted
Speaker 3: you to do something, right.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So the Jesuit Clement the thirteenth had banned it from
Speaker 3: the colleges and universities, and a rather quaint example of
Speaker 3: academic blown cover as cover, Bishop Vaughan Heinthem, whom few
Speaker 3: realized was for Bronius, even banned it from his own
Speaker 3: classes at the University. On the State of the Church
Speaker 3: is arguably Rerenzo Rickey's American Manifesto, the social blueprint for
Speaker 3: how the general intended to realize Bellarminian liberation and a
Speaker 3: Protestant monarchy. The full title page of the first edition
Speaker 3: copy of the book says it all on the State
Speaker 3: of the Church and the legitimate power of the Roman Pontiff,
Speaker 3: A singular book on the properly ordered reunification with dissidents
Speaker 3: in the Christian religion. Wow, it's right there in the text.
Speaker 3: Here one beholds a description of the momentous social change
Speaker 3: in the Roman Revolution would indeed produce neither monarchal overthrow,
Speaker 3: nor democracy nor republicanism, but a properly ordered reunification with
Speaker 3: dissidents in the Christian religion. That is, the reunification of
Speaker 3: Roman Catholics with Protestants under a secualized religion whose values
Speaker 3: long on humanism, short on scripture are taught through public
Speaker 3: schools following the Jesuit ratio studiorum. Reunification means that the
Speaker 3: Protestantism has been reabsorbed into Rome. This is the eye
Speaker 3: of the black papacy Jesuits son Zuanism mind and the
Speaker 3: common sense equals the practical extirpation of Protestantism. Huh So,
Speaker 3: what I found very interesting is that when they say
Speaker 3: they marriage with secularism, enlightenedment, enlightenment, as I said, the
Speaker 3: three candlesticks. When you go into a lodge and then
Speaker 3: you know, you kneel down in front of the little pulpit,
Speaker 3: little thing, Yeah, what is that? You have the two
Speaker 3: pillars a freemasonary essentially is each candlestick and you're looking
Speaker 3: at the third one, which is again Building seven equivalent.
Speaker 3: When when I could do that visually for you, Yeah,
Speaker 3: but it's basically saying you're you have the blindfold off,
Speaker 3: but when we take it off in the ceremony, you
Speaker 3: are then looking to that light, that light that you
Speaker 3: can find within yourself enlightenment because I have reached it
Speaker 3: with my own wisdom for how to obtain my own godhood. Essentially,
Speaker 3: you shall be like God's that is Catholicism, which when
Speaker 3: they merged again, don't get you look this up. Historically
Speaker 3: Constantine gave us Sunday worship. Yeah, right, and what is
Speaker 3: it son God worship versus the Son of God worship?
Speaker 3: And if we understood who Christ was, it was the
Speaker 3: word No man comes to the Father, but by me,
Speaker 3: it's not you go through God to get to God. No,
Speaker 3: I'm submitting to the Word made flesh. I'm accepting the
Speaker 3: promises fulfilled in the flesh. I'm accepting everything that you've
Speaker 3: laid out here as laws that I have to adhere
Speaker 3: and stand by to to become celestially one with the
Speaker 3: heavenly body. You're submitting to the word in order to
Speaker 3: get to God. That's what he wants. That's communion to
Speaker 3: most people understand this, no, because then we argue all
Speaker 3: this old triune thing and it's like, again going off
Speaker 3: of what they're showing. That's them.
Speaker 5: I'm with you.
Speaker 3: So again. Something I found interesting is when we're reading
Speaker 3: in Revelation seventeen five and upon her forehead was written
Speaker 3: the name Mystery Babylon the Great Right in red Fragurian
Speaker 3: caps were affiliated with mithra, which is an aspect of masonry,
Speaker 3: and Solnvictis became the predominant. There's aspects of both predominant
Speaker 3: for Catholics, and Trump happens to be wearing a red cap.
Speaker 4: And now those are saying that the red cap is
Speaker 4: because red is the Republican Party's dominant color.
Speaker 3: But it traces back to the red Frekurian cap. That
Speaker 3: the same like we read earlier in part one, to
Speaker 3: the red caps from the Boston Tea Party. Yeah, this
Speaker 3: is the same thing that the Sons of Liberty or
Speaker 3: the sorry the Liberty Tree guys. Yeah, that's the same
Speaker 3: thing that they were wearing. And also the French Revolution,
Speaker 3: which we do know that there's definitely ties, but jesuits
Speaker 3: with that whole thing kicking off. Yeah, so that's what
Speaker 3: I'm implying, whether it's true or not. I find it
Speaker 3: odd that abbreviated MAGA means magician made great illusion and
Speaker 3: says there's going to be an illusion over the hearts
Speaker 3: and minds of men mary Lands. He Trump is exchequer
Speaker 3: of the Vatican Bank, and that's by Gerald Posner and
Speaker 3: God's Bankers did a segment on Bloomberg. If folks just
Speaker 3: want to get a condensed version, because I don't have
Speaker 3: time for a six hundred page book like I've been reading,
Speaker 3: I get it. I think it might be seven hundred.
Speaker 3: He has a lot of citations. Yeah, but again I
Speaker 3: read and again, I'm taking excerpts from some books just
Speaker 3: to give you a little condensed version because I know
Speaker 3: sometimes I don't have time in today. I get it.
Speaker 3: So I'm just letting you know where you can find
Speaker 3: the resource, and if you invest, you'll see where I'm
Speaker 3: coming from. I'm not just you just don't like Trump.
Speaker 3: I voted for him twice. I'm not doing it again.
Speaker 3: So there you go. Don't say TDS Roman Martyr and
Speaker 3: traditional patroness of musicians, Did Cecilia's spirit bless the voyage
Speaker 3: with masculinity to cheer up the others and oppressive boredom?
Speaker 3: Did I already do all this noidation day? You know what?
Speaker 3: That's not too too important. But the second day of
Speaker 3: July in the year seventeen seventy six was Visitation Day,
Speaker 3: commemorating the event recorded in the first chapter Luke, where
Speaker 3: in the Virgin pregnant with the Messiah visits her cousin Elizabeth,
Speaker 3: who is pregnant with John the Baptist. Nowadays, Visitation date
Speaker 3: is celebrated on May thirty one, than the month of
Speaker 3: to moves from May twenty something to June twenty something
Speaker 3: in the year of seventy seventy six and celebrated on
Speaker 3: July second, as it has been celebrated according to the
Speaker 3: New Catholic Encyclopedia article Visitation of Mary every year since
Speaker 3: the Council at Bessil in fourteen forty one. So again,
Speaker 3: even the origins of our country has a connection with
Speaker 3: the Virgin Mary and that particular date July second and
Speaker 3: July fourth, because again July second is technically when we
Speaker 3: wrote it all third Leegendly, there were dragonflies within the thing,
Speaker 3: so they had to keep it closed overnight, and in
Speaker 3: July fourth is when they signed it. Whether or not
Speaker 3: they waited today for a reason, I'm going to show
Speaker 3: you another thing. But I found it interesting because again
Speaker 3: with Trump name was Mary, his aunt's name was Elizabeth,
Speaker 3: and his dad's was Frederick Christ.
Speaker 5: Wow, it's true.
Speaker 3: And again January sixth, that was the twelfth day of
Speaker 3: Christmas when the trees would come down. Also today, again
Speaker 3: Catholic tradition where you had the epiphany of John the Baptist.
Speaker 3: You can google this. This is basic stuff you can
Speaker 3: look into where allegedly Christ was visited by the magi
Speaker 3: as an adolescent. Yeah, and again word for Magi maga
Speaker 3: And allegedly it was the day that Christ was baptized
Speaker 3: by John the Baptist. So again, was that another symbolic
Speaker 3: ceremony insurrectionists? Who did the crowd choose over Jesus? Right?
Speaker 3: They chose social What did Christ say, I am the
Speaker 3: way of the truth in the life. I don't know.
Speaker 3: I'm just again seeing a lot of similarities and weird
Speaker 3: affiliations with this particular guy at this point in time
Speaker 3: and again, what's written on the constitution conceived in liberty
Speaker 3: right the hermaphrodite.
Speaker 5: Ah, you mean the Greek, I'm with you.
Speaker 3: As above, so below is the same pose as this.
Speaker 3: This is the origin of the pentagram. When you do
Speaker 3: several poses. There's a pointing down, there's the pointing upward,
Speaker 3: and then there's you know, this is them. It means
Speaker 3: earth when you're standing like this again, which is very
Speaker 3: odd because of what did Christ say, love neither the
Speaker 3: things of this world, but put to your hope and
Speaker 3: faith or paraphrasing, and things above which are in He.
Speaker 5: Said very clearly, my kingdom is not of this earth?
Speaker 3: Correct? And what does that exact pose mean? Then? I
Speaker 3: don't know. But Coagula salve I was reading again with Mithra.
Speaker 3: There was the phrase salve a coagula and it was
Speaker 3: talking about when they're holding a torch upward and a
Speaker 3: torch downward, or the fingers would be pointing like this
Speaker 3: and downward, which is the same thing as bah from it.
Speaker 3: Like I said, I dropped the book first time I
Speaker 3: read that because I was going so Mitzrad does indeed
Speaker 3: connect to Baphomet and Hermes because of the Caduce's staff
Speaker 3: and as above, so below. So it's not me pulling
Speaker 3: at things. I'm like the symbolism, the metaphors in the
Speaker 3: in the verbiage affiliated with per character all interconnect. It's
Speaker 3: not something I'm just like, you're just you know, smoking
Speaker 3: something really good and you're no, no, I'm this is documented.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I would.
Speaker 3: In a Masonic find on Instagram, they did a little
Speaker 3: AI picture here and they're talking, are you ready for
Speaker 3: the future?
Speaker 5: Brother robot Masons, dude, because.
Speaker 3: In one aspect of their faith religion, and as Elon
Speaker 3: Musk has said, mister xpro Cyrus rising, he has stated
Speaker 3: that it's possible to download your memories and then upload
Speaker 3: them into like basically a cyber web, right become a
Speaker 3: citizen of the Web. What if I say, b fishers
Speaker 3: of men, Internet inter place for too more corpse net
Speaker 3: to hold or restrain given to us by cern Celtic
Speaker 3: god of the underworld, an equivalent of Osiris or Dyspatar
Speaker 3: Latin sky god of the underworld, where we get Saint Petar.
Speaker 3: This is what they're looking forward to is when I die,
Speaker 3: I will send to become like a god like we
Speaker 3: hear in a lot of movies. Are you become a God? Right?
Speaker 3: This is their premise, But in the same aspect or
Speaker 3: same vein of that I can be regenerated and live
Speaker 3: on forever in an autonomous, robotic like existence. My spirit
Speaker 3: and entity will live on forever in an avatar, just
Speaker 3: like I have right now at the symbiotic relationship with
Speaker 3: the fallen Nephelene, demon de mon, right, I hear you.
Speaker 3: So it's like it's becoming. Oh, we we were children
Speaker 3: of the fallen watchers, the Nepholene, and then we are
Speaker 3: going to give you in exchange. When you accept this mark,
Speaker 3: we are gonna make you your own little DeBie gods,
Speaker 3: and you will send to be like my parents, and
Speaker 3: then we're reality. What I suspect is that, like it
Speaker 3: says in Enoch, the only explanation for how the angels
Speaker 3: get locked up under the review phrates. So God says
Speaker 3: to them as he's locking them up there, he says,
Speaker 3: your children, Nepheline are going to roam the earth for
Speaker 3: seventy generations until the time of the end. So if
Speaker 3: that's where we actually get demon, it's not an angel fallen,
Speaker 3: it's actually a slay Nephelem, and what we get with Joshua.
Speaker 3: He's slaying Nepheline, not Islam, not Ishmael's descendants. He's slaying Nephelem.
Speaker 3: Bad offspring are abominal to God's site and their spirits
Speaker 3: are roaming the earth. So when Christ comes down, he's
Speaker 3: over here casting out children of the gods again lower G,
Speaker 3: not capital G. It's casting them out. Why because they
Speaker 3: want human possession? Don't tell me they don't, because obviously
Speaker 3: a lot of them can even go into one person.
Speaker 3: So if you accept the mark of the Beast and
Speaker 3: you want to become the empire Iron and Clay, as
Speaker 3: foretold in Daniel chapter two, how do you do that? Well,
Speaker 3: I want to become a part of this tech technology aspect,
Speaker 3: and the root server for all AI computers is known
Speaker 3: as Demons or demon wave.
Speaker 4: I don't be honest with you, do as I understand
Speaker 4: this AI image of robotic Masonic lodges and things, and
Speaker 4: right fine, But as I'm thinking about it, I think
Speaker 4: it might be possible for a robot like to as
Speaker 4: is right now in our world, like become a brother
Speaker 4: of the Masonic lodge. Because if I'm not mistaken allegedly,
Speaker 4: per their words, you just have to believe in a
Speaker 4: divine creator. Doesn't matter which one, doesn't matter which religion,
Speaker 4: as long as you can acknowledge that well.
Speaker 3: Correct.
Speaker 4: If these robots have AI right, and they have basically
Speaker 4: the entire knowledge of the entire Internet downloaded into them, them,
Speaker 4: basically saying that they may or may not believe that
Speaker 4: a creator.
Speaker 5: Is possible, would make them able to join.
Speaker 4: Oddly enough, is it is it crazy that this is
Speaker 4: a real possibility in the world today, Like this image,
Speaker 4: this AI image is a thing that could really happen,
Speaker 4: must as already.
Speaker 3: I saw a clip on It was a TikTok guy
Speaker 3: and he's saying like, I don't know what it is
Speaker 3: with Elon Musk, but he is making us work almost
Speaker 3: twelve to eighteen hour shifts to get these things built,
Speaker 3: like some towers and something like that affiliated and he
Speaker 3: wants it up before twenty thirty. Now, I don't know.
Speaker 3: By in my episode Reading the Rainbow, I was breaking
Speaker 3: it down how a lot of the five G towers
Speaker 3: were signed in twenty twenty by a certain mister t Yeah,
Speaker 3: and they wanted up at least by twenty thirty, and
Speaker 3: they want to use humans as antennas. Now, what do
Speaker 3: we see in the movie Cell everybody walking around the tower?
Speaker 3: It was by John Cusack and Samuel Jackson were the
Speaker 3: stars of the movie. You guys kind of want to
Speaker 3: look it up, but it was having a whole bunch
Speaker 3: of humans walking around like zombies around a five G tower.
Speaker 3: And again five G pentagram Penta means five in Latin
Speaker 3: G for the god ram goat ram Aka. What we
Speaker 3: already had solve was nine to eleven on Baphomet's arm.
Speaker 3: The tattoo cowagila means blood clot So what's the last
Speaker 3: thing of the three pillars to unite all humanity? A
Speaker 3: little star of illusion over the hearts and minds of
Speaker 3: men on Baphomet's forehead. M Aka, you know the third
Speaker 3: eye aspect of the bad aspect because I don't want to,
Speaker 3: you know, just saying, but again the third eye of oh,
Speaker 3: you can ascend to become like your own God with
Speaker 3: your own wisdom. And again it is a Ponzi scheme.
Speaker 3: It is a pyramid scheme aka pun intended for the
Speaker 3: all seeing eye top of the pyramid. This is what
Speaker 3: they're lying about. But once they get what they want,
Speaker 3: We don't care about you. Thanks for doing what we wanted,
Speaker 3: you chumps. And what ends up happening the world becomes
Speaker 3: an international parasitical grid for demonic possession. And this is
Speaker 3: why I would suspect in revelation people will not be
Speaker 3: able to off themselves because are demonically possessed on a
Speaker 3: skill that has never before. It happened before, because what
Speaker 3: did Christ say? Don't worry about those I can kill
Speaker 3: the body because your soul is now secured. But here's
Speaker 3: the thing. The fallen watchers Christ redeemed our souls. They
Speaker 3: want to get their kids and bodies back right so
Speaker 3: they can enjoy pleasures of the flesh once more. Right.
Speaker 3: That's the dichotomy that we're dealing with. And if most
Speaker 3: people don't want to, you know again rolling their eyes. Whatever.
Speaker 3: If I'm right, don't say I didn't warn you when
Speaker 3: you get up there to the big guy. That's all
Speaker 3: I'm saying. I'm pleading with you. I could be wrong,
Speaker 3: but a lot of my research seems to be indicating
Speaker 3: we're this close. Because what did Elon Musk just say
Speaker 3: about a week or two ago. I'm dark, Maga dark, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: I am red and black is chrometic with hermeticism. That
Speaker 3: you do a brave browser red and black hermeticism and
Speaker 3: you will find something I didn't mean, but it's not
Speaker 3: on this particular present. But I'm just saying this is
Speaker 3: stuff that is out there.
Speaker 5: Yes, indeed, brother, so addis.
Speaker 3: Again affiliated with the Frgurian god a ka Fregurian red
Speaker 3: caps Furi Addis allegedly, are.
Speaker 5: You saying frug Gurian uh.
Speaker 3: F freed Gian Frygian Fragerian Frygiian Frisian Phrygian, okay, should
Speaker 3: rather be c I, A N or si G. That's
Speaker 3: never mind what you can google it.
Speaker 5: Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm that's not a soft G.
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 3: Frisian Frisian god of sun vegetation born of a virgin.
Speaker 3: As I was saying, he's definitely affiliated with Tomos because
Speaker 3: one thing says he died by a wild boar, just
Speaker 3: like to mouse and the Catholics why he worked for you,
Speaker 3: And the other thing is he catraded on himself. Whether
Speaker 3: true or not, I find there's a validity because Addis
Speaker 3: and Sibill are affiliated as the same thing and they
Speaker 3: lived on. So, like I said, after Babbel. It's like
Speaker 3: Teladiti telephone. The stories kind of myth they mix out,
Speaker 3: in and out. You have the Titan lure prior, so
Speaker 3: a lot of it can get jumbled up. But like
Speaker 3: I said, there is a consistent narrative that leads us
Speaker 3: right back to Babel and the Unholy Trinity throughout history
Speaker 3: and their symbolism. But but but he bled to death
Speaker 3: after emasculating himself, which is kind of what we're doing
Speaker 3: in our culture today, in the month of Tamous, of
Speaker 3: all months that we celebrate for the children of Pride,
Speaker 3: was brought back to life by his lover Sybelle. Like
Speaker 3: his mama Grammy. His resurrection was celebrated each spring by
Speaker 3: the Romans beginning in third CBCE. After two millennia, he
Speaker 3: traveled to the New World as one hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: foot woman adrogynist religious pantheons aka the Statue of Liberty.
Speaker 3: And again, what did it say in the spring? When
Speaker 3: did we land in Maryland? First day of Spring?
Speaker 5: Yeah, and Corona talked about that last time.
Speaker 4: I think the Statue of Liberty is a rather handsome
Speaker 4: broad Yeah, yeah, solid all one.
Speaker 3: The Corona is the top of the Hermetic Kabala of life.
Speaker 3: So again it means a spiked crown. What do they
Speaker 3: put in Christ? And contrast as going outward? As I
Speaker 3: said before, it was inverted. So there is reasons again
Speaker 3: heal thyself healer? What was Hermes, the god of healing
Speaker 3: and the god of trade. He carried the Cadusa's staff
Speaker 3: of healing. It was mockery of their kabbal law aspects.
Speaker 3: And that's what I'm always trying to show folks. We
Speaker 3: can Yeah over the Actually it was just the wise
Speaker 3: owl again talking about with Rome. They were finding it,
Speaker 3: Jesuits were finding it was easier to convince the masses
Speaker 3: from on a stage with entertainment than actually from behind
Speaker 3: a pulpit to change around the culture. Just condensing that
Speaker 3: because we want to save time, like white and Blue
Speaker 3: does trace back to Egypt with the caps that the
Speaker 3: pharaohs would wear. Yeah, again condensing, let's see, yes, we'll
Speaker 3: read this one. Vatican two affirms Catholic doctrine dating back
Speaker 3: to thirteen oh two, when Pope Boniface the Eighth asserted
Speaker 3: it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human
Speaker 3: creature to be subject to the Roman pontiff. So you
Speaker 3: don't have as you submit to the pope.
Speaker 4: Right, which is the narrative that they really ran with
Speaker 4: for a long time.
Speaker 5: And some some still do.
Speaker 3: Well, that's as zen times, man, they're going to come
Speaker 3: out in full force with their claws bear this time.
Speaker 3: This was the inspiration for the papacy to create the
Speaker 3: United States of America, and that materialized in seventy seventy
Speaker 3: six by a process just as a secret Reagan Vatican
Speaker 3: production of Eastern Europe in nineteen eighty nine. What American
Speaker 3: government Roman Catholic from the beginning? Yes, consider the land
Speaker 3: known to day as the District of Columbia bore the
Speaker 3: name of Rome in sixteen sixty three property records, and
Speaker 3: the branch of the Potomac was known as Rome. Blah
Speaker 3: blah blah blah. This information reported in the nineteen oh
Speaker 3: two edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia article by Daniel Carroll.
Speaker 3: The article specifically declaring itself of interest to Catholics in
Speaker 3: the nineteen oh two edition, was deleted from the New
Speaker 3: Catholic Encyclopedia in nineteen sixty seven. Other facts were reported
Speaker 3: in nineteen oh two and deleted from in nineteen sixty seven.
Speaker 3: For example, when Congress met in Washington for the first
Speaker 3: time in November eighteen hundred, the only two really comfortable
Speaker 3: with imposing houses within the bounds of the city belonged
Speaker 3: to Roman Catholics. One was Washington's first mayor, Robert Brent.
Speaker 3: The other was Brent's brother in law, Not Lee Young,
Speaker 3: a Jesuit priest. Daniel Carroll was a Roman Catholic congressman
Speaker 3: from Maryland who signed two of America's fundamental documents, the
Speaker 3: Article of Confederation of the United States Constitution. Carol was
Speaker 3: a directed descendant of Calverts and the Catholic family to
Speaker 3: whom King Charles the First of England had granted Maryland
Speaker 3: as a feudal barony. Carol had received his education at
Speaker 3: Saint Omars, again tracing consistently that these guys always tie
Speaker 3: back to Rome. And even though they're trying to delete stuff,
Speaker 3: there's evidence enough with symbolism to just basically point out
Speaker 3: we probably should look into it's a lot of Catholics.
Speaker 3: You'll tell them, well, how do you explain the Queen
Speaker 3: of the heavens? You don't even know where that is
Speaker 3: in your Bible, do you. Because again, going by a
Speaker 3: lot of former Catholics who I'm good friends with, they've
Speaker 3: said that a lot of times in the family house.
Speaker 3: They don't open the Bible at all. So when somebody again,
Speaker 3: I'm beseeching you, it's in the scripture, Why is it
Speaker 3: triggering you so much? Yeah, that's what I'm asking, because
Speaker 3: the Christians should be convicted, not triggered. It's a different.
Speaker 4: I just learned recently that one of the big portions
Speaker 4: of the Great Schism was that some people believe that
Speaker 4: Mary died of virgin and others believe that she was
Speaker 4: like blameless and quote unquote sinless until the Immaculate Conception.
Speaker 4: There's reasons why she was chosen in all this, and
Speaker 4: then she continued on being a regular woman and had
Speaker 4: other children, and that's why they referenced Jesus' brothers in
Speaker 4: the Bible, and this whole thing that was, like, I mean,
Speaker 4: there was more than just that point, but like that
Speaker 4: apparently was way hotter of a topic than I think
Speaker 4: a lot of current Christians realize, and it completely has
Speaker 4: nothing to do with Jesus. But people are willing to
Speaker 4: like fight over it. Yes, it's insane.
Speaker 3: You're related to fight over stupidity. Topics as opposed to
Speaker 3: actually getting meeted in the word. You know what, I'm like,
Speaker 3: it's irrelevant neither here nor there, But that's the stuff
Speaker 3: you're going to argue about, as opposed to actually living
Speaker 3: the word right. So has it become a religion for
Speaker 3: you now where you have to be right with your argument,
Speaker 3: or has it become you know, a relationship is like
Speaker 3: this is me. I'm bragging about my groom because I'm
Speaker 3: happy about what he did for me. I mean you
Speaker 3: have to accept him to no. But I can present
Speaker 3: a case as an arbiter and explain context and clarity
Speaker 3: and come show you how evil the world is as
Speaker 3: supposed to just saying, you know, a great awakening crap
Speaker 3: and stuff like that. I'm giving you context of where
Speaker 3: you could truly find security, because if it is true
Speaker 3: and we are close to the end times, I don't
Speaker 3: want to be guest saying on my at least on
Speaker 3: my on my plate. I tried my best. I explained
Speaker 3: as much as I could, I did as many shows
Speaker 3: as as possible. I recommended a dozen thousand books. I
Speaker 3: answered people's questions and dms. This is what I tried
Speaker 3: to do. Not everybody accepted it, and I'm okay that
Speaker 3: it's not I'm not. I'm not I can't save everybody,
Speaker 3: and I'm not saying I do save anybody. I'm saying
Speaker 3: I'm giving you resources so you can come to that
Speaker 3: conclusion and decision on your own. That is Christianity. The
Speaker 3: other one says you gotta do it. Why so I
Speaker 3: submit and kiss your butt. So right, it's personal decision.
Speaker 3: Mithrust slaying the Bull the Inconquerable Sun God. I found
Speaker 3: it interesting because Dionysus is affiliated with October seventh, Oh God,
Speaker 3: and that was when we had a certain thing occur
Speaker 3: last year. And Dionysus is an equivalent of Nimrod, and
Speaker 3: he's also known as the mascot of theater which we
Speaker 3: went through during twenty twenty. Yeah, so again, like I said,
Speaker 3: Mithro does connect with Baphomet, and again Mithrust slaying the Bull.
Speaker 3: Mithruss represents Apollo and the bull represents God. Donald Trump
Speaker 3: is their man to perform that taro uktany the ritual
Speaker 3: where Mithrust kills the bull aka God. Don't take my
Speaker 3: word for it, because what did Nimrod tried to do
Speaker 3: building going or into heaven? And what is Trump knowing
Speaker 3: four towers and he made what space force forced yourself
Speaker 3: into space. He's partnering with Elon musk.
Speaker 4: Oh, are you telling me my man's gonna end up
Speaker 4: eating grass? I would not, like, I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 4: We're talking in the realm of hypotheticals and all of that,
Speaker 4: but like if we already go down that same, that
Speaker 4: same rabbit hole here, like, are we saying that as
Speaker 4: possible your boy Donnie T might develop some sort of
Speaker 4: weird knack for grass and behaving like a beast here soon?
Speaker 3: Bro Oh, you're talking about like a Nepikindzer moment.
Speaker 4: No, damn it, I gotta mixed up my bad you
Speaker 4: said Nemrod In some reason my brain with nebuc Sorry, sorry,
Speaker 4: completely derailed.
Speaker 3: I got you, I got you, But I was laughing
Speaker 3: because again bulls the red Heifers, Is there is there
Speaker 3: something there? Because they already call America the new edom
Speaker 3: or which is the new Rome? Again, this is by them.
Speaker 3: I've played a dozen clips before on my Instagram. Again
Speaker 3: their words, not mine, just showing you what's out there,
Speaker 3: because again no I'm not, I'm just this is what
Speaker 3: they believe. And if quoting them is anti Semitic, then
Speaker 3: I don't know what's wrong with you, because if a
Speaker 3: quote is antisemitic or history is anti semitic, I don't know.
Speaker 3: I don't know how to help you. I'm just I mean, oh,
Speaker 3: this is an interesting one, because again, so unfortunately I
Speaker 3: didn't want it to be. I voted for him twice.
Speaker 3: So don't give it. Don't give me the scrap. Every
Speaker 3: ruled society has some form of holy scripture, the Holy
Speaker 3: Scriptures of Cassarian Rome, where the prophecies uh Sysyrian sorry,
Speaker 3: Syrian Rome, where the prophecies are the ritual directions contained
Speaker 3: in the Sybil line against Sibylists, where we get that
Speaker 3: in our colleges, Gospels, and virgils the Eneid. The Eneid
Speaker 3: implied that every Roman's duty was to sacrifice his individuality
Speaker 3: as a heroic Aeneas had done to the greater glory
Speaker 3: of the Rome and the Pontifus Maximus Sibilians, borrowing from
Speaker 3: Isaiah's much earlier prophecy of Jesus, Christ, prophesied that Caesar
Speaker 3: Augustus succeeded his uncle Julius as Pontifus Maximus, which in
Speaker 3: the Cult of sol Invictus, a book a costs ninety
Speaker 3: four bucks on brill you can get it printed out special.
Speaker 3: It means a chief of the pagan priests. He would
Speaker 3: rule as quote Prince of Peace, son of God. Augustus
Speaker 3: would issue the New World Order, as indeed he did.
Speaker 3: The Sibilians of the Eneid were so beloved by the
Speaker 3: governor priests that they were considered part of the Roman Constitution.
Speaker 3: The same scriptures were made part of the United States
Speaker 3: Constitution when the mottos of Annuit Coeptus, Novus order Siclerium
Speaker 3: taken from the Eneid and the Sibilings, which is a
Speaker 3: New World Order. Now here's the scary part is that
Speaker 3: on Trump's manual award, they gave him the same exact
Speaker 3: verse with the Prince of Peace, which is supposed to
Speaker 3: foretell christ Birth. Not Trump's accomplishments.
Speaker 5: You said they gave Trump. They gave him this win.
Speaker 3: A minural award. And this was in Monday, February the
Speaker 3: twenty six, twenty twenty four, the seventeenth day of Adar
Speaker 3: one mar a Lago.
Speaker 5: Wow.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so again I kind of scratch my head. Here
Speaker 3: we can skip ahead. Let's go, Let's go to the
Speaker 3: Flag because we're already going to the two hour mark.
Speaker 3: And if okay, so, folks, you want to follow me
Speaker 3: on Manna Daily podcast, Spotify, Rumblet YouTube, One Nation under
Speaker 3: Satan if you want to get again, because on our
Speaker 3: show we tend to chatt and to go into other stuff.
Speaker 3: But if you want to work comdense just three hours,
Speaker 3: go onto those things. I'll probably do other towurst folks,
Speaker 3: but I don't want to take Jacob's time too much.
Speaker 3: So we're gonna talk about Lorenzo, Ricky the Flag, and
Speaker 3: then we'n be wrapping up. I think that's pretty much
Speaker 3: all I got left. So this introduction confirms that Paul
Speaker 3: the Third wore declaration of Reggie mini militanous ecclus. I
Speaker 3: can't even pronounce half the stuff. I do apologize, but
Speaker 3: it's I don't care. Is about protecting the life of
Speaker 3: the nation, which is the Roman Church. Protecting the Church
Speaker 3: may require this superior general to sacrifice his soldiers, his citizens,
Speaker 3: and if need be, his sovereign. The Pope, well, somebody
Speaker 3: died at the event. Correct.
Speaker 4: Wait a minute, Wait a minute, they're giving him permission to
Speaker 4: sacrifice even the Pope bro.
Speaker 3: Whoa, but somebody died at his event. Somebody died during
Speaker 3: nine to eleven. Yeah, did you hear what I just said?
Speaker 3: You're all expendable canon. The ends justify the means. This
Speaker 3: is them, their doctrine. This is how sick it is.
Speaker 3: I'm willing to kill my own brothers in order to
Speaker 3: get this down. This is what their stuff is saying.
Speaker 3: In a very real sense. The Great General is so
Speaker 3: inscrutably alone and so omnipotent that he is the war
Speaker 3: with everyone, sacrificing his own, just as Saturn, the grandfather
Speaker 3: of Rome, devoured his own child like KFC was doing
Speaker 3: with their little thing. Yeah, that's yeah where it's getting
Speaker 3: it from. In order to defeat an enemy short of
Speaker 3: coming to blows, this is the Great General's legitimate obligation.
Speaker 3: Sun Zoo rights again. This is General Ricky, that the
Speaker 3: guy we've been referring to. Lorenzo. Ricky's most compelling ruse
Speaker 3: was disestablishing the Society of Jesus, allegedly officially outwardly. This
Speaker 3: is what happened underground and became Illuminati slash Mason America,
Speaker 3: a campaign that mimi to the collapse of the Knights
Speaker 3: Templar four centuries earlier, with astonishing precision. That disestablishment ran
Speaker 3: concurrently with the escalation of the hostilities between the American
Speaker 3: colonies and the British Crown. It was an amazing juggle
Speaker 3: that spanned seventeen years. Saw Ricky's secret liaisons in and
Speaker 3: around the British Parliament by legislation that inflamed his secret
Speaker 3: liaisons in and around American colonial governments to formulate a
Speaker 3: culture of rebellion. It saw his own visible army, mute
Speaker 3: and defenseless, systematically assaulted by the European powers, eventually suppressed
Speaker 3: for all eternity. That's in quotation Marks seventeen seventy three
Speaker 3: seventy seventy three Papal Brief. Once the stage was set,
Speaker 3: the action scripted, it was the general slip into deeper cover.
Speaker 3: The Protestant powers exhaust themselves in wars that within a
Speaker 3: single generation resulted in a glorious Roman presence where once
Speaker 3: England had reigned DestinE. Military operations inspired by the ingenuity
Speaker 3: of sun Zoo are virtually impossible to document. If strategic
Speaker 3: notes were taken, if written commands were given, they were
Speaker 3: carefully destroyed such that survive may have been spared in
Speaker 3: order to misinform. The mouths of the convert operatives are
Speaker 3: kept shut out of a simple desire to stay alive.
Speaker 3: Sensational disclosures too, we can presume to be misinformational. The
Speaker 3: determine the lornza RICKI did, in fact mount a clandestine
Speaker 3: operation at all requires a careful exhaustion evaluation. Sorry of
Speaker 3: the circumstantial evidence, Brendon, I want.
Speaker 1: To ask you, dude. All right, I'm back. Everything is
Speaker 1: all packed and ready to go for the trip. We
Speaker 1: are good, Okay, it's going to be a great time.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I've been hearing you kind of in the background.
Speaker 1: I'm packing my bag, computers in my bedroom. Whatever is
Speaker 1: is it possible that Trump doesn't know? All right? If
Speaker 1: all of this is true, you talk about Trump and
Speaker 1: he could be the Antichrist, he could be the Prince
Speaker 1: of darkness, Prince of peace.
Speaker 2: Whatever is it.
Speaker 1: Possible that he doesn't know that he is, that he's
Speaker 1: being possibly propped up and set up to become this character?
Speaker 3: So given back in twenty seventeen, doctor Thomas Horn from
Speaker 3: SkyWatch News, there was a guy on Trump's spiritual Advisory Council.
Speaker 3: He could basical gives them a call says, hey, I'm
Speaker 3: not allowed to give my name because where I am
Speaker 3: at I could get terminated. But they're telling Trump that
Speaker 3: he has the potential to become their guy to build
Speaker 3: the Third Temple if he does a certain amount of
Speaker 3: edex and whatnot, and they're constantly explaining to him what
Speaker 3: the Messiah figure is required on their man made outline
Speaker 3: of what is expected. So he does know he's definitely
Speaker 3: prepping himself and aligning himself in such a way that
Speaker 3: he is the perfect candidate to be the second Cyrus,
Speaker 3: which apparently he did achieve because he moved Jerusalem's embassy
Speaker 3: or whatever it was on the Abrahamic Accords, he did
Speaker 3: move it into Jerusalem. And they commemorated this event by
Speaker 3: printing a coin with Cyrus and Trump on the cover.
Speaker 3: Right on the back the Third Temple, and ironically enough,
Speaker 3: there was a dove flying in front of said temple,
Speaker 3: which again the dove is interesting because in nineteen eighty three,
Speaker 3: and you can look up YouTuber on point Preparedness Trump's
Speaker 3: dove prophecy, he was breaking down that since nineteen eighty three,
Speaker 3: they have been prepping Trump to become the negotiator in
Speaker 3: Palestine slash Israel conflict. Don't take my word for it,
Speaker 3: because let's rewind back to the coin. It is the
Speaker 3: Balfour Decoration, which was signed on nine to eleven. If
Speaker 3: you're going by how they sign it in Europe, it
Speaker 3: is the date first, then it's the again. So was
Speaker 3: signed on nine to eleven to nineteen seventeen. It says
Speaker 3: the Balfour Decloration Cyrus Trump Balfour Decoration and from nineteen
Speaker 3: seventeen to twenty seventeen. So don't tell me this is
Speaker 3: not something that's coincidental. What's going on right now in
Speaker 3: the Middle East is perfectly alliance. So when he comes
Speaker 3: to ascend the throne, he can establish peace and be
Speaker 3: the negotiator.
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's all right, which piece you would think
Speaker 1: is a good thing, you know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Like peace in the Middle East, that's great.
Speaker 1: Now, how that conflict was brought about, we all talk
Speaker 1: about how net and Yahoo probably.
Speaker 2: Is the one that allowed all.
Speaker 1: This to happen, being is that he had a hand
Speaker 1: in creating a moss and all that fun jazz. Right,
Speaker 1: you got you got Jared Kushner married to his daughter
Speaker 1: and all the Jewish ties and everything as far as
Speaker 1: I've all right, So I got two more questions as
Speaker 1: far as this goes all right? So the is it
Speaker 1: the the Ewes as you like to say, that are
Speaker 1: propping him up to take this mantle and fulfill this role?
Speaker 2: Yes, and why would they do that?
Speaker 3: Because they're Messia figure is not of Jewish descent. He
Speaker 3: is like King Cyrus, he was a gentile. And what
Speaker 3: their messiah figure does, because everybody's reading the Bible is like, well,
Speaker 3: he was like, why didn't you conquer the Romans that
Speaker 3: were oppressing us? Their Messiah figure gets rid of the
Speaker 3: obstacles that oppress them, the things that stand in their way, which,
Speaker 3: in Noah Hydelaw's terms, Trump is the champion of noahid laws.
Speaker 3: According to Israeli National News of twenty twenty, you can
Speaker 3: look up that article, and he is basically already stated
Speaker 3: that it's time to implement the death penalty for anti Semitism,
Speaker 3: which I believe I played before you for you guys
Speaker 3: on the show. So for me, I'm seeing already the
Speaker 3: I don't know, the dominos lining up as it were,
Speaker 3: that he's trying to bamboozle the evangelical dispensationalists. So basically,
Speaker 3: if you have those adjectives as part of your Christian identity,
Speaker 3: you're already brainwashed because dispensationalism is Zionism for gentiles. You're
Speaker 3: thinking there's a holy land, a sacred people, which not
Speaker 3: biblical as we did in God's Been I've broken that down.
Speaker 3: Why that significant spiritually speaking, but in their perspective, it's
Speaker 3: fitting the credentials perfectly. Good guy is going to eliminate
Speaker 3: our enemies? And what does it say? I saw the
Speaker 3: heads of the saints for the witness of Christ in
Speaker 3: Revelation twenty verse four, So I don't know, but Noah
Speaker 3: Hidlaws talks about losing your head if you speak out
Speaker 3: against them.
Speaker 1: So correct me if I'm wrong in saying that. You're
Speaker 1: saying that he's said to be like the new Cyrus
Speaker 1: or whatever? Are we talking about, like the actual Savior
Speaker 1: to come, like the actual guy who was prophesied that
Speaker 1: eventually Christians came to accept as Jesus. But the Jews
Speaker 1: don't accept Jesus. There is Trump trying to fill that
Speaker 1: Jesus role according to the Jews.
Speaker 3: So anti Christ does not necessarily evil incarnate as we
Speaker 3: always hear in a lot of mainstream Christ. It's substitute
Speaker 3: in place of so yes, in a sense, is saying
Speaker 3: we don't really need Christ, because he's already stated. Twenty fifteen,
Speaker 3: he was doing an interview. He says, well, you know,
Speaker 3: do you ever ask God forget forgiveness? And he just
Speaker 3: goes little, you know, I don't really try to bring
Speaker 3: God into all of that. I just try to do
Speaker 3: better from there. So he doesn't say he has repentance,
Speaker 3: because the Bible says you have to confess with your mouth.
Speaker 3: And secondly, he said, and this was during his administration,
Speaker 3: because some evangelical lady was saying, ah, people can change, no,
Speaker 3: because he says, I am the chosen one, which don't
Speaker 3: take my word for it. We have the Natasha Owens
Speaker 3: song which you can YouTube with Trump that was inspired
Speaker 3: by that phrase, the chosen One, which is very blasphemous
Speaker 3: in and of itself, and the man is essentially as
Speaker 3: I was showing you, and God's been divorced. He has
Speaker 3: the phrase word became flesh affiliated with him on billboards.
Speaker 3: A lot of people are making the comparison, is this like, oh,
Speaker 3: just like God sent his son from the heavenly realm.
Speaker 3: He sacrificed everything for us. They literally have a bumper
Speaker 3: sticker as I've taken a screenshot of that before, where
Speaker 3: the lady was saying that just like you know, Trump
Speaker 3: had all this wealth and he sacrificed it, all of
Speaker 3: it for us so that he could run our country,
Speaker 3: and he's being persecuted. They literally have drawn a correlative line.
Speaker 3: And since the two assassination attempts, they have literally amplified
Speaker 3: him to like a deity, a demigod, where if you
Speaker 3: hurt him, you're hurting God's chosen one.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: But the reason why the Jews don't accept Jesus as
Speaker 1: the savior is because he didn't check every.
Speaker 3: Box right, a lot of standards correct. Right?
Speaker 1: But is there I mean, are we looking at the
Speaker 1: boxes that need to be checked for Trump in order
Speaker 1: for him to become this savior? How does he check
Speaker 1: more boxes than Jesus did?
Speaker 3: And Kaba Lah their savior figure is not is essentially
Speaker 3: the third Cyrus. This is tri Hermes, the three philosophies
Speaker 3: of the tri Hermes. As I've read before the Emerald tablets.
Speaker 3: Their God is about materialism, Their God is about wealth.
Speaker 3: Their God is about getting rid of our physical enemies
Speaker 3: in this life, and they sickly by doing so. He's
Speaker 3: going to open take away all the obstacles in our
Speaker 3: way so that we can ascend to become our own gods.
Speaker 3: This is their stuff. So we're we get lizard people
Speaker 3: like I read before. They think they will be serpentine
Speaker 3: and dwelled, similar to like the Venom movies, so that
Speaker 3: they become their own gods on this realm. This is
Speaker 3: their beliefs. This is hermeticism. Kabbalah is finding enlightenment, interlight,
Speaker 3: find the interlight within yourself, sun, God worship what Catholicism does.
Speaker 3: This is what they are believing. And this is why
Speaker 3: Building seven is so significant. Did you hear that part
Speaker 3: that I explained to Jacob?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, I mean I spend most of the time
Speaker 1: in my in my room with all this podcast shit.
Speaker 1: So I mean I was listening, you know, trying to
Speaker 1: stay in touch that way. Whenever I came in, I'd
Speaker 1: have some kind of idea.
Speaker 3: You have today, gotcha?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: So and one more question?
Speaker 1: All right, So with all of this, let's say all
Speaker 1: of this is true, all the stuff about Trump about
Speaker 1: he is not the character that he is portraying, at
Speaker 1: least to the people that believe him, believe in him.
Speaker 1: What happens if he all right, if he becomes elected elected,
Speaker 1: what happens then, Like, what's next? I mean, what's the
Speaker 1: domino effect? You know that's that's gonna be happening.
Speaker 3: I can't predict the future, just throwing that out, but
Speaker 3: I can give possibly an outline based off of what
Speaker 3: they got for the Google images for the year ahead,
Speaker 3: based off of if it's true what we get in
Speaker 3: the Bible, that he would suffer a head wound, which
Speaker 3: I would not be surprised, Like it's like a fatal
Speaker 3: one this time, and he comes back, I would not
Speaker 3: be surprised. And how would they do it? Maybe cern
Speaker 3: maybe Elon Musk does some sort of profound miracle with
Speaker 3: his technology that the economy starts getting really good. Maybe
Speaker 3: he like abolishes the irs or something like that. And again,
Speaker 3: everybody's gonna be like, this is the greatest thing ever.
Speaker 3: That says for the first three and a half years
Speaker 3: of tribulation, it looks really good. So from like twenty
Speaker 3: five to like what twenty seven, twenty eight, that's when
Speaker 3: things would start hitting the fan.
Speaker 1: Interesting, how it's three and a half years. That's only
Speaker 1: six months before the next election then, correct.
Speaker 3: And it would be around the month of Tamous. Ironically enough,
Speaker 3: and ironically enough, in the years ahead, they have Jesus
Speaker 3: and Satan doing an arm wrestling match. Twenty twenty seven
Speaker 3: was Armageddon. Whether or not that's all true, I don't know.
Speaker 3: But if they're over here mapping it out, and as
Speaker 3: I've said before, if they create their own version of Armageddon,
Speaker 3: and for evangelical Christians, they're expecting Christ to return. He's
Speaker 3: going to save his chosen people. He's going to rap
Speaker 3: to us up. There's no raptor. Christ doesn't return and
Speaker 3: all this stuff doesn't go exactly as they've been being
Speaker 3: told for the last two hundred years, because again this
Speaker 3: is only last two hundred years they've been saying that
Speaker 3: all this is gonna happen. So you've demoralized Christianity by
Speaker 3: literally making prophecy come about, but nothing happening for them.
Speaker 3: You know, the package deal that they invested in with
Speaker 3: became a Christian was to get the the perks, benefits
Speaker 3: or seeing all that, but they didn't happen. And so
Speaker 3: they're demoralized and they're reeling in shock and awe, and
Speaker 3: also in total dismay of all this chaos and anarchy
Speaker 3: and for what. And the Bible says that people are
Speaker 3: going to be crying for peace and security at that time,
Speaker 3: and they have in twenty twenty nine an alien invasion
Speaker 3: Project Blue being.
Speaker 1: Let's go, well, right, not the word.
Speaker 5: Don't worry.
Speaker 3: They're here to help fix it for us. They are
Speaker 3: here to help us find the inner light Mithra Jesus,
Speaker 3: all of them, they were all the same, but you
Speaker 3: missed it, humanity, And don't worry. The ancient Ananaki space gods,
Speaker 3: we will help fix it for you. All you've got
Speaker 3: to do is put this little technology in you and
Speaker 3: we will help imbue you and finding that inner light
Speaker 3: within yourself. Don't take my word for it. The Catholic
Speaker 3: Church is already prepping for it, saying maybe the Balians
Speaker 3: will be baptizing us.
Speaker 1: Okay, now let's say hypothetically here, all right, I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to, you know, take a peak too far into
Speaker 1: the future, but just hypothetically, let's say Trump somehow becomes president.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's gonna happen. I think that they're
Speaker 1: going to start a world War three before they allow
Speaker 1: him back in the White House personally.
Speaker 3: But let's just too serious. One of them might have.
Speaker 1: Right, let's say Trump becomes president and it's and it's
Speaker 1: all good. It's all kosher, you know, like everything, not
Speaker 1: to use one of those words, but but but it's
Speaker 1: all good, right, And and the economy is doing great.
Speaker 1: You know, the housing market's great. I mean, the the
Speaker 1: inflation's going down. Everybody has more jobs. You know, everything
Speaker 1: is exactly how it was on the trajectory for whenever
Speaker 1: he already was president before COVID came, let's say, for
Speaker 1: the for four years, it's absolutely phenomenal. And this country
Speaker 1: you know, goes back to its uh greater dominance kind
Speaker 1: of ways. Right then, what because he can't be elected again?
Speaker 3: He can in the rally and Florida Turning Point USA
Speaker 3: event during the Olympic Games.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you won't have to vote. You'll never have to
Speaker 1: vote again, he was talking to the event.
Speaker 3: What do you mean, bro, what do you mean you'll
Speaker 3: have it fixed so good? I have questions about this.
Speaker 3: I thought we were supposed to have a cycle where
Speaker 3: we again. But do you think a lot of Republicans
Speaker 3: because let's say this happens something that you just pitched.
Speaker 3: Possibly I ran Russia phill in blank. Somebody interfered with
Speaker 3: our elections. You know, all those social security accounts. Somehow
Speaker 3: they hacked in, they rinked the whole system, and now
Speaker 3: blah blah blah. So we have a whole lot of
Speaker 3: fighting turmoil fill in blank. Or they cut down the
Speaker 3: Internet let's say about a couple months, and then they
Speaker 3: come back and they explained to us what happened. This
Speaker 3: is why we need to start initiating that not some
Speaker 3: dumb idiot can just hack our freaking Internet. We need
Speaker 3: to have it where it's internationally. We can start making
Speaker 3: it where you have to have a digital ID passport
Speaker 3: in order to get on in access the Internet, like
Speaker 3: they already have for our military. As Heidi Love from
Speaker 3: Unfiltered Rise as attested, she has held these things in
Speaker 3: her hand, that they do this now for the average citizen,
Speaker 3: where essentially your social security is now equated to your
Speaker 3: online presence. You cannot get onto your computer or access
Speaker 3: the internet without that. So if they do this with
Speaker 3: say the fall election or sometime in the near future,
Speaker 3: what does that give the incentive to do just like
Speaker 3: nine to eleven, they passed the Patriot Act, which was
Speaker 3: already being prepped, and they passed it within three days.
Speaker 3: Now they do that with our internet, which they want
Speaker 3: to have that up by twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 2: Well, they're going to try and say, well, this is
Speaker 2: going to eliminade shit posters, it's going to eliminate hack artists.
Speaker 3: Here in the theory, this thing, that thing, all this
Speaker 3: disinformation crap.
Speaker 2: Right right, So I guess you could say that.
Speaker 1: But also they're talking about what is it like, uh,
Speaker 1: the web two point oh or the web three point
Speaker 1: oh kind of version to where basically anytime you post
Speaker 1: something like if you're on Facebook, Instagram, what ever, if
Speaker 1: you make a post and somebody shares it, which is
Speaker 1: actually pretty cool, but if somebody ends up sharing it,
Speaker 1: then they have to pay you to share your thing,
Speaker 1: which is pretty interesting. And it's a like another way
Speaker 1: for people to like, I guess, stay at home and
Speaker 1: make money or whatever just creating fucking memes all day,
Speaker 1: which sounds like a dream, but.
Speaker 5: Like real life professional meme lord.
Speaker 1: Honestly, honestly, that's really what it would become, you know,
Speaker 1: And I don't know, I think that there's a lot
Speaker 1: of possible awesome things to come in the future. But
Speaker 1: with that, I think comes a lot of restrictions, and
Speaker 1: there's gonna be a lot of red tape on anything
Speaker 1: that you're trying to say, anything that you're trying to post.
Speaker 2: I think that.
Speaker 1: The First Amendment is going to be even more heavily restricted.
Speaker 1: And yeah, I don't know. I think that there's going
Speaker 1: to be a balance for sure. I mean, people are
Speaker 1: already having to monitor what they say on TikTok on YouTube.
Speaker 1: That's why we're not on YouTube anymore. I mean, thank
Speaker 1: god they haven't come after podcasts yet anyway.
Speaker 3: So implying is that I would highly suspect because just recently,
Speaker 3: I think it was two three days ago, Zuckerberg just
Speaker 3: hired a lady that was a close advisor to net
Speaker 3: and Yahoo to start controlling anti Semitism speech on meta platforms.
Speaker 3: Saw I would not be surprised because again I'm what
Speaker 3: I'm saying is I'm seeing dominoes aligning perfectly. And whether
Speaker 3: I'm right or wrong, I do think the censorship thing
Speaker 3: is about to hit the fan wildly within the next
Speaker 3: two to three years. And I can see how they're
Speaker 3: going to orchestrate it because we already got Bill Gates saying,
Speaker 3: you know, we got all this in misinformation online AI
Speaker 3: with you know, Taylor Swift, you know all the Taylor
Speaker 3: Swift supporters. We can't have her naked photos going on
Speaker 3: from AI getting on the internet. That's just you agree
Speaker 3: with this policy idea, don't you, right, So you're gradually
Speaker 3: already implementing it by getting people to be emotionally invested.
Speaker 3: Why they have to give a crap about it?
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, And I think that like people people
Speaker 1: for some reason that they trust way too much in
Speaker 1: the government. They just want to be governed as much
Speaker 1: as humanly possible. They want to outlaw things, they want
Speaker 1: to put new laws into place and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: It's like whatever happened to, like are we are we
Speaker 1: incapable of governing ourselves in such a way that we
Speaker 1: have to be literally governed at every single possible step?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean by the law, by the government,
Speaker 1: by the higher ups. Like what happened to just public shaming?
Speaker 1: Can we just bring that back? Can what happened to
Speaker 1: just canceling people like you know, just one on one?
Speaker 1: Why do we have to bring in the law you know, dueling.
Speaker 4: I have been saying this great again, like or tryal
Speaker 4: by combat. I'm good either way, Like I think both
Speaker 4: should be viable.
Speaker 5: Why not.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean I'm not totally against that, but whatever,
Speaker 1: whatever the case is. It's just like, why why are
Speaker 1: we trying to We're trying to change this country so much,
Speaker 1: and people are like, oh, this country's horrible, this country that,
Speaker 1: this country.
Speaker 3: This.
Speaker 1: It's like, so adding more laws is going to make
Speaker 1: it better? Like do you think that adding more laws
Speaker 1: is going to make this place more of an oasis?
Speaker 2: No, it's not.
Speaker 3: That's what I'm telling folks. I'm like voting as Stockholm syndrome.
Speaker 3: You literally are saying me harder daddy, like. And this
Speaker 3: is the thing. This is why First Samuel was so big.
Speaker 3: For Samuel eight, where God saying they don't need a king.
Speaker 3: They didn't reject you, they rejected me. They already had me.
Speaker 3: They're being led by the Holy Spirit. They had the
Speaker 3: pillar of smoke, they had the Mana and heaven, they
Speaker 3: had all of this, but they still want something as
Speaker 3: a substitute. This is why I say religion versus relationship.
Speaker 3: I want to commune with you personally, but I have
Speaker 3: some standards. As Jacob was saying earlier, well, that sounds
Speaker 3: my snatronistic. Again, that's what some people will perceive it as.
Speaker 3: That was some people will perceive it as I. But
Speaker 3: again that's what people are. But God's like, I have
Speaker 3: standards too, and I've given them the bill of divorce
Speaker 3: because after almost like what a thousand years of being
Speaker 3: their God, they're still rejecting me. They don't get it
Speaker 3: that you can't play the field and have me as
Speaker 3: your God at the same time. So now with Christ again,
Speaker 3: God's been divorced with communion ceremony, you are accepting to
Speaker 3: be submitted to the Word made flesh, and you're going
Speaker 3: to emulate that. You're gonna become the bride. So it's
Speaker 3: not oppressive. It's a personal decision to submit to the
Speaker 3: Word to get to the Father. There's a lot of
Speaker 3: people are if you're going, well, I need the pastor,
Speaker 3: I need a pope, I need this, I need that,
Speaker 3: And He's like, no, you don't need all that baggage.
Speaker 3: You don't need a representative, you don't need an intermediator.
Speaker 3: You got me. The man wants to make it religious
Speaker 3: because tradition, the big building, lots of money, good looking clothes.
Speaker 3: Come on, what's wrong with this? Exactly what God doesn't like?
Speaker 3: So again I understand where people are coming from. But
Speaker 3: I'm like, yeah, that's what you see in a lot
Speaker 3: of modern Christianity. That's where we're getting it wrong. And
Speaker 3: that's why I love Frank Fiola's book Pagan Christianity because
Speaker 3: it starts breaking it down chapter by chapter. Why do
Speaker 3: you do this? Why do you give tithe? Why do
Speaker 3: you get dressed up? Why do and he breaks it
Speaker 3: down historically the pagan roots of all this stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's worth investing.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, let me ask you too. I mean,
Speaker 1: I know that we're you know, kind of just rambling
Speaker 1: on at this point, but just out of curiosity as
Speaker 1: far as all right, because you always come on here
Speaker 1: and you're always pointing out the things against Trump. And honestly,
Speaker 1: that's probably what ruffles the most feathers out of everything else,
Speaker 1: is because we over here we tend to be more
Speaker 1: pro Trump than against Trump, just because you know, I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna say we're just voting for him because of
Speaker 1: the alternative. Although the alternative is probably the worst alternative
Speaker 1: that's ever been presented. As just as far as incompetency personally. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean yeah, we got Literally she makes Biden look good.
Speaker 2: You know that's sad.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I totally agree. Like I said before, I
Speaker 3: voted for him twice, but there's a reason why I'm
Speaker 3: not voting anymore.
Speaker 1: And again that's just throwing that out there, so just
Speaker 1: out of curiosity. Whenever the election comes and there has
Speaker 1: to be a winner, Biden can't remain president, so one
Speaker 1: of them has to take the man sole right whenever
Speaker 1: that happens. Who are you going to be more upset
Speaker 1: about as far as who wins? Let's just ask that question,
Speaker 1: because they don't seem to be. I mean, according to you,
Speaker 1: neither one of them seems to be really a good option.
Speaker 1: But which one is the less scary version to you?
Speaker 3: Well, again, that's tapping into the lesser to evils and
Speaker 3: evils still evil, and they're both masons. They're both whatever
Speaker 3: filled control blank of uh position, bad guys. So for me,
Speaker 3: nothing's changed, But I'm not gonna lie Spiritually, I feel
Speaker 3: quite nauseous seeing Trump's merchandise because I genuinely feel in
Speaker 3: my spirit that's the guy that's gonna come and kill me.
Speaker 3: And when I say that, guy saying followers like that
Speaker 3: they're so cult mindset and arrogant as opposed to a liberal. Yeah, they'll,
Speaker 3: you know, they get upset, they'll you know, go in
Speaker 3: their personal liberal snowflake thing and they'll have to have
Speaker 3: their personal safe. But what's a Republican going to do?
Speaker 3: They got the guns. Somebody was asking me why you
Speaker 3: want the Republicans. Well, they're the ones that the guns.
Speaker 3: They're the ones that love fucking right right, they will
Speaker 3: kill for him.
Speaker 2: It's them, You're all fucking right, we will.
Speaker 4: I mean you stay strapped to get clapped. I mean,
Speaker 4: I'm happy to be a part of that party. But
Speaker 4: that was like, damn, okay, well that was a big
Speaker 4: shwing and a miss on my.
Speaker 3: Like, I just this whole presentation seventy seventy six. Why
Speaker 3: do we do it? You're doing it for the man,
Speaker 3: You're doing it for the government. You know, I why
Speaker 3: you're doing it.
Speaker 1: I feel like there there are those people that would
Speaker 1: absolutely go to war on his behalf. But I also
Speaker 1: don't think that those numbers are as like the the
Speaker 1: extremist let's just call them like the people that showed
Speaker 1: up at the White House or not the White House,
Speaker 1: at the Capitol and trying to to storm the Capitol
Speaker 1: and all that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, six series, we're not extremists. They were citizens that
Speaker 4: were peacefully assembled and then were let into a building.
Speaker 1: I'm not even gonna go as far as to say extremists,
Speaker 1: but let's just for argument's sake, call them extremists, right.
Speaker 5: The names of them, I got you.
Speaker 1: Those are the people that are going to show up,
Speaker 1: right like, And that wasn't a massive crowd. You're talking
Speaker 1: about a country full of people that wasn't even a
Speaker 1: tenth of a percent that showed up. And so I
Speaker 1: don't know if you're going to see like I think
Speaker 1: in general, most people are not gonna do anything no
Speaker 1: matter what happens. World War three is gonna happen, and
Speaker 1: people are gonna be wondering why they're fuck it, why
Speaker 1: the line at Starbucks is taking too long?
Speaker 4: Can I ask a question of both of you, Historically speaking,
Speaker 4: you only need ten percent of a country to have
Speaker 4: a military overthrow. I'm just historically speaking throughout name your time.
Speaker 4: For a country to topple itself, you only need ten
Speaker 4: motivated percent.
Speaker 2: All right, but ten percent is still a lot, because how.
Speaker 5: Much not a small numbers, how millions.
Speaker 1: Like how much of a percent are are you know,
Speaker 1: too young to fight? How much of a percent or
Speaker 1: too old to fight? How much of a percent are
Speaker 1: women that will never fight? And I'm not saying not
Speaker 1: all there are women fighters, you know. What I'm saying is,
Speaker 1: but like.
Speaker 5: That statistic is strictly for military aged men. Excuse me.
Speaker 4: That was because when we're talking historically speaking, you wouldn't
Speaker 4: have ten percent of the women that are going and
Speaker 4: revolting in the streets to topple a government. It would
Speaker 4: be ten percent of the men just throughout the course history,
Speaker 4: so per the poll numbers, you know.
Speaker 1: Oh well, yeah, I don't know, dude. I just I
Speaker 1: know that there's a lot of speculation as to what's
Speaker 1: going to happen after or maybe even before I think
Speaker 1: possibly before the election. Uh, I don't know, dude. It's
Speaker 1: like because everybody's coming up with so many theories, like Brandon,
Speaker 1: you're coming on here and you're talking about Trump might
Speaker 1: be the Antichrist. I don't know, I mean, the the
Speaker 1: it I'm going to look at.
Speaker 3: This on the first three and a half years, So
Speaker 3: I'm going to sound like I'm completely nuts. That again,
Speaker 3: if you're going by Bible definition and people, again, it's
Speaker 3: like a boiling frog. You don't even see it. It
Speaker 3: looks so good. How could you not want to accept
Speaker 3: this system? Are you an idiot? Brandon? You're anti Semitic,
Speaker 3: You're anti Trump, you're anti Maga, you're anti okay, And
Speaker 3: as to say that Christians are going to be hated,
Speaker 3: I'm against all all of y'alls. I'm against Dermocrats, Republicans,
Speaker 3: the dark you know, fill in blank. And apparently that's
Speaker 3: going to be a problem. And again, are liberals going
Speaker 3: to be the guys picking up that. No, they're going
Speaker 3: to be easy to wipe out in a second, like
Speaker 3: as they already said in communism, is like line them
Speaker 3: up against the wall and will pop them because we
Speaker 3: don't need them anymore. But thank you for brainwashing most
Speaker 3: of the population and the rest. It's like, well, you know,
Speaker 3: we need to get rid of the CIA and the
Speaker 3: FBI America. Yay, finally somebody's abolished them, and I'm going
Speaker 3: to replace them with my own people. Oh that's good,
Speaker 3: because they try to assassinate him twice, so he's going
Speaker 3: to create his own thing, they'll be loyal to me.
Speaker 3: Oh that's great.
Speaker 1: So do you believe do you believe that we should
Speaker 1: be a Christian nation?
Speaker 3: But again it's going to be weaponized under the impression
Speaker 3: of outline it looks Christian we support Israel? Do we not?
Speaker 2: Sure? Sure?
Speaker 1: But I'm I'm just asking your preference. Do you believe
Speaker 1: that this country should be a Christian nation?
Speaker 3: It's not about a nation, it's about per individual. That's
Speaker 3: the scary thing is that that's what it's going to become.
Speaker 3: Is saying, well, are you against the Christian faith? No,
Speaker 3: I'm just against merchant government with God, the world, with
Speaker 3: the word, the science of scripture, Christ with country. That's
Speaker 3: a problem.
Speaker 2: That's where I was going.
Speaker 1: You know, you don't want to mix politics and religion
Speaker 1: because then you start getting you want to talk about it.
Speaker 1: That's where extremism comes in.
Speaker 5: Let me also throw this out too.
Speaker 4: I got into this debate with somebody I think two
Speaker 4: years ago to family gathering. They were not spitting Marxist rhetoric,
Speaker 4: so to speak, but they were of the opinion that communism.
Speaker 5: Isn't like the worst thing ever, right.
Speaker 4: But this person also has a lot of a lot
Speaker 4: of twists and their chonies about Christianity as a whole
Speaker 4: because of all the bad that has been done throughout.
Speaker 5: The course of history and the name of Jesus.
Speaker 4: And yes, fine, fine, okay, So I did some crunching
Speaker 4: of some numbers here. Christianity as a religion is responsible
Speaker 4: for somewhere around seven hundred million deaths, okay.
Speaker 5: And that's true. That's a real thing.
Speaker 4: You look at all the wars that have been waged
Speaker 4: for quote unquote religious reasons. If Jesus was associated, fine, fine, okay,
Speaker 4: let's go down that road here. So, and Christianity didn't
Speaker 4: even get you know, unionized, so to speak, until the
Speaker 4: three hundred to five hundred eight.
Speaker 5: So let's give a little bit of a break here.
Speaker 4: So in how long are we talking about here, seventeen
Speaker 4: one hundred years.
Speaker 5: Give or take just best case in theary. You know,
Speaker 5: I'll even give it for the best ratios here, because
Speaker 5: that's how I did my math.
Speaker 4: Let's say, fifteen hundred years, seven hundred million deaths.
Speaker 5: Okay, that's bad.
Speaker 4: I get that Communism is currently responsible for going on
Speaker 4: one hundred and thirty million deaths from its inception less
Speaker 4: than two hundred years ago. So if we're looking at
Speaker 4: the ratios here, you are eleven times more likely to
Speaker 4: die because of communism existing than you are from Christianity
Speaker 4: on the fucking war path. So in conclusion, am I
Speaker 4: personally mad at the thought of a Christian nation. I'm
Speaker 4: a lot more comfortable with that than I am a
Speaker 4: communist nation. That's just Jacob, that's just looking at the
Speaker 4: maths and deaths and things, you know.
Speaker 3: But again, Catholicism just bold for doing it for God
Speaker 3: and country. That was actually led by a group that
Speaker 3: were you wish and they wanted to go back and
Speaker 3: reclaim the temple because they were missing King Solomon's ring,
Speaker 3: and that's part of the reason why they started leading
Speaker 3: the crusades. And what do they do it in Christ's name?
Speaker 3: But what were they wear? Red crosses? What is the
Speaker 3: symbol of Tamus and Bacchus the cross? So again you
Speaker 3: get a lot of gentiles, you tell them it's for good,
Speaker 3: and a lot of idiots are going over they're thinking
Speaker 3: they're doing it in God's name? Was Christ say apart
Speaker 3: for me, I never knew you get out of here.
Speaker 3: You did it in my name? No, you didn't. You
Speaker 3: did it in your own name. You created God in
Speaker 3: the definition in your own name. Again, religion, you did
Speaker 3: that yourself. Don't say ye, don't say I'm affiliated with
Speaker 3: that was the same proverbs I hate hands that shed
Speaker 3: innocent blood. Yeah, don't tell me you're alive with scripture,
Speaker 3: because scripture condemns you. But again, seven hundred million, you
Speaker 3: then subscrowded half of that with Catholicism, and you'd cut
Speaker 3: down that probably by a good portion because you had
Speaker 3: the Spanish Inquisition that went on for four hundred years,
Speaker 3: which a lot of Catholics. It's like, hello, Saint Bartholomew's
Speaker 3: Day massacre up to twenty five thousand to thirty thousand
Speaker 3: Protestant Aguanats or whatever, just saying.
Speaker 4: Oh, yeah, no, no, the reasons for those deaths are
Speaker 4: preposterous and ridiculous, and we see it as such. But
Speaker 4: just looking at the numbers of it. When people are
Speaker 4: talking about how, you know, we should be more of
Speaker 4: a socialist nation, we should be more of a communist nation.
Speaker 4: We should you know, imbibe more of Karl Marx's ideas
Speaker 4: into our government, it's like, bro, y'all understand how deadly
Speaker 4: that is, right, Like, how that's never successfully worked ever
Speaker 4: one time, and it is that much more deadly than
Speaker 4: the alleged biggest death.
Speaker 5: Toll bringer to the face of the earth and all.
Speaker 4: It's like, it blows my mind how people don't we
Speaker 4: have like a very short memory when it comes to
Speaker 4: history for some reason, I don't understand how and why
Speaker 4: when we have all the information at our fingertips, people
Speaker 4: only want to look back till just a yester century ago.
Speaker 5: And it blows my mind.
Speaker 3: But again, that's what they have us thinking, is that, oh,
Speaker 3: it's only our country, it's only the west. The West
Speaker 3: is the only thing that counts. Everybody else is evil.
Speaker 3: They're barbarians at the edge of the empire. Which doesn't
Speaker 3: that sound like ancient Rome a little bit. We need
Speaker 3: to protect our borders, we need to slay it in
Speaker 3: like okay, all right, guys, you gotta cool it down.
Speaker 3: What do you mean you're up for it? Uh? Now?
Speaker 5: The lynch mob, no, no doubt.
Speaker 3: So in the Society of Jesus could conquer through believed dead,
Speaker 3: could not with its superior general do the same. When
Speaker 3: Lorenzo Ricky died in his cell and Castel s Angelo
Speaker 3: on November twenty fourth, my birthday, seventy seventy five. What
Speaker 3: his death was no more a physical than the supposed
Speaker 3: disestablishment of his army lestermistics of Ricky, who secretly commanded
Speaker 3: the Ross Crucians. Christian master Masons were known to die
Speaker 3: and resurrect at the threshold of an important endeavors. According
Speaker 3: to the material available, the Supreme Council of the Fraternity
Speaker 3: of the Ross Croex the Ross Crucians was composed of
Speaker 3: a certain number of individuals who had died what is
Speaker 3: known as the philosophical death. When the time came for
Speaker 3: the initiate to enter upon the labor for the order,
Speaker 3: he conveniently died under somewhat mysterious circumstances. In reality, he
Speaker 3: changed his name in place of residence, and a box
Speaker 3: of rocks or a body secured for the purpose was
Speaker 3: buried in his stead. It is believed that this happened
Speaker 3: in the case of Sir Francis Bacon, who, like all
Speaker 3: servants of the Mysteries, renounced all personal credit and permitted
Speaker 3: others to be considered as the authors of the documents
Speaker 3: which he wrote or inspired aka Shakespeare. Hm. Was it
Speaker 3: really Ricky's body lying in the state of the cathedral
Speaker 3: and San Giovanni and fill another Italian word during the
Speaker 3: elaborate funeral mass of the pious the six arranged for him.
Speaker 3: Was it really Lorenzo Ricky who was entombed beneath the
Speaker 3: Church of Jesue a week later in the vault reserved
Speaker 3: for the generals of the society, or was it a
Speaker 3: wax effigy similar to Bohemian grove sculpted by the artisans
Speaker 3: upon a corpse of Ricky's dimensions under the direction of
Speaker 3: John Carroll's collaborated man about Rome and the art agent
Speaker 3: extraordinaire Francis Thorpe. Of course, Lorenzo Ricky would have covered
Speaker 3: his tracks and simultaneously SINZOOI and fashion, so we will
Speaker 3: never know for sure. But it is not consistent with
Speaker 3: his authority, resources, motives, and modest operendi, as well as
Speaker 3: the verifiable outcome of the American Independence, that the General
Speaker 3: would feign death at precisely the opportunity to sail to
Speaker 3: America in order to conduct and orchestrations personally reflect on
Speaker 3: his council. The thirteen articles of sun Zoo, particularly the
Speaker 3: great art of the General is to arrange for the
Speaker 3: enemy to never know the place where he will have
Speaker 3: to fight, and carefully withhold him from knowledge of what
Speaker 3: the post he must guard. If he manages that he
Speaker 3: can also hide the slightest of his movements, then he
Speaker 3: is not a clever general. He is an extraordinary man,
Speaker 3: a prodigy without being seen, he sees, he hears without
Speaker 3: being heard. Go to the places where the enemy would
Speaker 3: never suspect you, and tended to go. Do not think
Speaker 3: of gathering the fruits of your victory until his entire
Speaker 3: defeat has put you in a position where you yourself
Speaker 3: can re conci try whatever tranquility and with leisure. So
Speaker 3: if the General did sale to America rather than lie
Speaker 3: in state, he would arrive conquering hero. But as a gentle, harmless, nameless,
Speaker 3: scholarly old man who spent most of his time reading,
Speaker 3: and during the course of his stay, inevitably someone would
Speaker 3: observe his subtle power over the great patriots and write
Speaker 3: about it, just so as one person observed and is
Speaker 3: written about. So. In the fall of seventy seventy five,
Speaker 3: Congress authorized a committee made up by Benjamin Franklin, Thomas
Speaker 3: Lynch and Benjamin Harrison, and George Washington to consider and
Speaker 3: recommend a design for the first United Colonial flag. Again
Speaker 3: so blah blah, and during the fall blah blah blah
Speaker 3: that Lorenzo Ricky was seventy two years old. The professor
Speaker 3: spoke many fluently languages, fluently disabled the encyclopedic knowledge of history,
Speaker 3: and was seemingly at home upon every topic coming up
Speaker 3: in the conversation that was had at this boarding lady's house.
Speaker 3: We might expect the very same Lorenzo Ricky, a distinguished
Speaker 3: professor of literature, philosophy and theology at the Roman College.
Speaker 3: A well established confidant of Europe's leading intellectuals, philosophies and mystics.
Speaker 3: The Professor kept locked away in a large, old fashioned
Speaker 3: cubicle shaped iron bound, heavy oaken chest a number the
Speaker 3: very rare old books and ancient manuscripts which he spent
Speaker 3: of his time deciphering, translating, and rewriting. We might expect
Speaker 3: that as much of lorenzol Ricky, the voracious scholar and
Speaker 3: publisher of the Oriental Masterworks. On the morning of December thirteenth,
Speaker 3: seventy seventy five, the committee men arrived in Cambridge for
Speaker 3: a midday feast. The professor greeted them as we might
Speaker 3: expect Ricky wood with an ease, grace, and dignity, evidencing
Speaker 3: his superior ability, experience of attainments, and with a courtly
Speaker 3: bow that left no room for doubt that he had
Speaker 3: habitually associated with those in acknowledged authority. When Benjamin Franklin
Speaker 3: was presented to him, the hostess watched the patriarchal doctor
Speaker 3: lock hands with the patriarchal Professor, and as the fingers
Speaker 3: closed upon fingers, their eyes also met, and there was
Speaker 3: an instantaneous, a very apparent, mutually gratifated recognition. So what
Speaker 3: had the woman witnessed Unknown Superior, Ultimate summit, Unknown Superior
Speaker 3: revealing himself to the America's greatest, free grandest Freemason, Ben Franklin.
Speaker 3: The table talk soon focused on subjects that had occupied
Speaker 3: Lorenzo Ricky's attention since the beginning of his generalate. The
Speaker 3: hostess witnessed them discussing the relation of the colonies to
Speaker 3: each other in the mother country. She saw them discuss
Speaker 3: the related question of one's duties to the colony as
Speaker 3: related to his allegiance to Great Britain. She saw the
Speaker 3: Professor take a noticeable, though not at all obtrusive part
Speaker 3: in the conversation, himself possessed with a wonderful fund of
Speaker 3: varied and accurate information concerning the colonies, as understanding of
Speaker 3: their progress, condition and needs, and a familiarity with the
Speaker 3: principles and operations of the British and European statementship, when
Speaker 3: we expect as much from a superior general of the
Speaker 3: world's best intelligence agency. After lunch, General Washington and the
Speaker 3: committeemen held a brief undertone conversation. Then Doctor Franklin rose
Speaker 3: and stated, as the chairman of this committee, speaking of
Speaker 3: my associates, with their consent and with the approval of
Speaker 3: General Washington, I respectfully invite the Professor to meet with
Speaker 3: the Committee at one of its members, and we, each
Speaker 3: one personally and urgently request him to accept the responsibility
Speaker 3: and to give up us the American colonies the benefit
Speaker 3: of his council. Taking the floor, the Professor accepted the responsibility.
Speaker 3: Then startingly he proposed that hit to his disciple, the
Speaker 3: hostess be placed on the committee because she is our hostess,
Speaker 3: because she is a woman, and above all, because she
Speaker 3: is a superior woman. The committee considered this as an
Speaker 3: invitation in innovation, Yet the Jesuits had always been employing
Speaker 3: female coadjutors for centuries. The proposal immediately and unanimously adopted.
Speaker 3: Luncheon was adjourned and the committee would reconvene at seven
Speaker 3: in the evening and the guest chamber, usually occupied by
Speaker 3: the professor. Franklin and the Professor spent the afternoon together
Speaker 3: walking about Cambridge. When they returned, the hostess noted that
Speaker 3: both of them were relieved and confident look of earnest
Speaker 3: and determined men who in a satisfactory way solved perplexing issues.
Speaker 3: At the evening session, Franklin turned the meeting over to
Speaker 3: his new found and abundantly honored friend. The subject was
Speaker 3: a flag. This is we're going to understand why America's
Speaker 3: flag means, addressing the committee as comrade Americans. Huh. The
Speaker 3: Professor explained that since the colonies were dependent upon Great Britain,
Speaker 3: we are not expected to design or recommend a flag
Speaker 3: which will represent a new government or an independent nation,
Speaker 3: but instead one that will testify our present loyalty as
Speaker 3: English subjects. A flag that was already in use, a
Speaker 3: flag that had been recognized by the British government for
Speaker 3: over half a century. A flag having a field of
Speaker 3: alternative horizontal red white stripes and a grand Union flag
Speaker 3: of Great Britain in the upper left corner. I refer,
Speaker 3: he said, to the flag of the East India Company.
Speaker 3: To hide the fact that the Americans would be fighting
Speaker 3: under the private flag of an international mercantile corporation controlled
Speaker 3: by Jesuits. The professor provided a plausible cover whereby the
Speaker 3: flag could be explained to the masses. So again, it's
Speaker 3: going to be something with public, It's going to be
Speaker 3: something they see every day. How do we explain it
Speaker 3: when somebody says, what are the colors on the flag mean?
Speaker 3: This is going to be the story We give them.
Speaker 1: Fifty fifty United States and thirteen original Yeah, I remember
Speaker 1: that song?
Speaker 3: Do you think that down in junior church? And now
Speaker 3: when I hearing it, I'm like, ah, bay no. So
Speaker 3: the Union flag of a mother country is retained as
Speaker 3: the Union of the upper left corner of our new flag,
Speaker 3: to announce that the colonies are loyal to the just
Speaker 3: and legitimate sovereignty of the British Government. The thirteen stripes
Speaker 3: will at once be understood to represent the thirteen Colonies
Speaker 3: their equal with will type the equal rank, rights and
Speaker 3: responsibilities of the colonies. The union of the stripes in
Speaker 3: the field of our flag will announce the unity and
Speaker 3: interest of the corporate union of efforts which the colonies
Speaker 3: recognize and put forth in their common cause. The white
Speaker 3: stripes will signify that we consider our demands just and reasonable,
Speaker 3: and that we will seek to secure our rights through peaceable, intelligent,
Speaker 3: and statesmanlike means, if they prove at all possible. The
Speaker 3: red stripes at the top in the bottom of our
Speaker 3: flag will declare the first and the last, and always
Speaker 3: we have the determination, enthusiasm, and the power to use
Speaker 3: force whenever we deem the force necessary. The alteration of
Speaker 3: the red and white stripes will suggest that our reasons
Speaker 3: for all demands will be intelligent and forcible, and our
Speaker 3: force is securing our rights will be just and reasonable.
Speaker 3: The Professor reminded the Committee that the masses of the
Speaker 3: people and a large majority of the leaders in the
Speaker 3: public opinion desire of removal of grievances and the rectification
Speaker 3: of wrongs through a fuller recognition of the rights of
Speaker 3: the British subjects, and a few desire a free few
Speaker 3: of them expect at this time a complete severance of
Speaker 3: their present political and dependent relations with the English government.
Speaker 3: The severance would occur before the sun and next summer's strength,
Speaker 3: indicating the Professor fornew that Lorenzel Rickey would have fornown
Speaker 3: a July declaration of independence at that time. The East
Speaker 3: India Company could be easily modified by replacing the union
Speaker 3: jack with the stars against a blue background to make
Speaker 3: it announce the represent a new independent nation. Washington and
Speaker 3: Franklin lavished the professor idea with a special approval and
Speaker 3: unstinted praise. The Committee formerly and unanimously adopted the East
Speaker 3: India Company's banner, known as the Thirteen Stripes and as
Speaker 3: the general flag, and recognized as the colonial Army and Navy,
Speaker 3: just before midnight. They adjourned. On January two of seventy
Speaker 3: seventy six, as a formal ceremony attended by the Flag Committee,
Speaker 3: George Washington personally hoisted the East India Company flag upon
Speaker 3: a towering specially raised pine tree of all things a
Speaker 3: liberty poll, unfurling the breeze and displaying it for all
Speaker 3: the first time to see to his army, the citizens
Speaker 3: of the Vicinity, and the British forces in Boston. The
Speaker 3: British officers of Charleston Heights perceived the don't take my
Speaker 3: word for it.
Speaker 1: Whoa So the East India Trading Company, that's what it's
Speaker 1: the trading company? Right?
Speaker 3: Ever watched the Pirates of the Caribbean movies. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: I'm laughing because I'm reading National Geographic for kids back
Speaker 3: in the day when those movies were coming out, and
Speaker 3: they're here going well, they didn't really have too much
Speaker 3: to do in the Caribbean. Then I'm reading this and
Speaker 3: I'm like, ah, yeah you say, and again like it
Speaker 3: is not like I said before. You have nine stripes
Speaker 3: going one way, you have eleven columns nine to eleven,
Speaker 3: and then you have thirteen nine plus eleven plus thirteen
Speaker 3: equals thirty three.
Speaker 1: Son of dude.
Speaker 3: And like I said, the top of the pyramid, pyramid
Speaker 3: scheme all seeing I what country is that? America? And
Speaker 3: that symbol is affiliated with tamous pollion at bad Dawn.
Speaker 3: That's the name in the Greek for the son of Perdition,
Speaker 3: ironically is Revelation nine to eleven. And who has nine
Speaker 3: stars over his eye and two stripes on his Instagram?
Speaker 3: You can go right now, who has that who was
Speaker 3: president four or five, four seven, nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: So all right, so this, this East India Trading Company
Speaker 1: was the first flag that that old g dub put up.
Speaker 1: That's what it was saying, right it. And but this
Speaker 1: must have been before we had the flag with what
Speaker 1: was it like a circle of stars, before it was
Speaker 1: all fifty right.
Speaker 5: The Betsy Ross flag.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so that that came after.
Speaker 3: This, right, because they again as they expanded and stuff
Speaker 3: like that, which I would not be surprised if we
Speaker 3: dig into enough that you would find that fifty stars
Speaker 3: has some sort of connotation with the occult. I'm still
Speaker 3: digging into that at this current time. But the Gregorian
Speaker 3: calendar as well, like we've covered before in nine to eleven,
Speaker 3: three plus six, nine six plus five, nine to eleven
Speaker 3: sixty five, is affiliated with MITRA. Again, METRA followers were
Speaker 3: red caps.
Speaker 1: Why would an East India company have a British part
Speaker 1: of the British flag on the flag.
Speaker 4: Well, the East India Trading Company was based out of England.
Speaker 4: They basically rivaled the crown as far as okay, how
Speaker 4: could I put this? This was one of the first
Speaker 4: examples of international politics and economy working not always neck
Speaker 4: and neck with each other, sometimes as a matter of fact,
Speaker 4: against each other.
Speaker 7: Whole wars were waged because of who had actual power
Speaker 7: over the seas, the British Navy or the East India
Speaker 7: Trading Company that just decided to put guns on all
Speaker 7: of their fucking ships, which they had more of, and
Speaker 7: like it's there.
Speaker 4: They was very very messy, very controversial. The Dutch India
Speaker 4: Trading Company again very controversial. What you look at what
Speaker 4: they do with Africa, it's wild. It's this was a
Speaker 4: big thing for a while. Have you ever seen the
Speaker 4: show Taboo, No excellent show if you go check it out.
Speaker 5: Your boy who plays.
Speaker 4: Venom Tom Tom hart Hardy, Tom Hardy, Yeah, he plays
Speaker 4: a former East India Trading Company guy.
Speaker 5: They call him a company man, right.
Speaker 4: It was an FX show and that means that he was,
Speaker 4: you know, at least knew the company a bit and
Speaker 4: knew how they operate. He was also a British sailor
Speaker 4: at one point and he also had blood ties to
Speaker 4: a port that was like very strategic. It's an excellent show,
Speaker 4: very fucked up. Him and his sister be fucking and things.
Speaker 4: But that's weird.
Speaker 1: But like Tom Hardy's a fucking stud in almost everything
Speaker 1: that he's in though.
Speaker 4: And I'm just saying I like him for so many reasons.
Speaker 4: But anyway, the role is insane. But as far as
Speaker 4: the trading companies and how that all goes, it's it
Speaker 4: really is pretty crazy how much real life monopoly power
Speaker 4: Rothschild power, Carnegie, like this was that style of real
Speaker 4: stroke per that day and age.
Speaker 3: Yeah, again, the finances are always what controled the wars,
Speaker 3: like the Italian Revolution was funded by Masons from the UK.
Speaker 3: Again what they were trying to do during the Civil War,
Speaker 3: as we covered before, and now you have the East
Speaker 3: India Company again, pirates sculling bones, sculling bones. The Blacks
Speaker 3: were pirates, Freemasons or were some of them inspired by
Speaker 3: this as privateers for the Jesuits. I don't know, but
Speaker 3: all I'm saying is that it's completely plausible. Now this
Speaker 3: is the last big thing and then we can kind
Speaker 3: of close her up. So did you know that even
Speaker 3: the year the independence seems divinely validated by the perfect
Speaker 3: design of the sixes and sevens contained within the expression
Speaker 3: of the Roman numerals mdcc lxx five one because MDC
Speaker 3: equals sixteen hundred or one plus six equal seven clx
Speaker 3: one sixty one plus six to seven, and then x
Speaker 3: plus five and one equals sixteen, so one plus six
Speaker 3: equal seven. And interestingly enough, as I said, Lorenzo Ricky
Speaker 3: said it's not going to happen in seventy five, even
Speaker 3: though they could have called it back in December seventy five.
Speaker 3: He said it has to be next year. Why well,
Speaker 3: because Roman numerals of seventy seventy five, the following groups
Speaker 3: would not have added up to this MDC sixteen hundred.
Speaker 3: Wait did I get this correct? Or did I goof
Speaker 3: oh yeah, sorry, this is the seventy seventy six, but
Speaker 3: this is seventy seventy five where it adds up to
Speaker 3: six sixty six. Okay, So again, was this founded as
Speaker 3: an anti Christ nation to bring us back? Helios? East
Speaker 3: meets West and again you can look up six seven
Speaker 3: articles of Trump East meets West, East meets West, and
Speaker 3: he has Helios writing at a chariot between two pillars
Speaker 3: and all seeing eye and a pentagram riding from east
Speaker 3: to west. And Trump's the one that did space force again.
Speaker 3: Symbolism wise, again, it's at Ding Ding ding. That's not
Speaker 3: Prince Charles, that's not Obama, that's not Kamala, that's not
Speaker 3: fill in the blank of all these other people. It's
Speaker 3: affiliated suddenly with Trump. And the thing that I found
Speaker 3: interesting is when they were doing their Council of Trent,
Speaker 3: there's a depiction on the wall and they have Hermes
Speaker 3: leading the possession of all the Jesuit priest are going
Speaker 3: to this location. Hermes connects with mercury, and as I
Speaker 3: said before, Hermes connects with to moose, And as I
Speaker 3: said before, Donald Trump means world ruler. Trump to deceive
Speaker 3: one upper out to someone else. Donald stems from Adonis,
Speaker 3: a donnis is Dumazid equivalent. Dumazid was a Samerian goat
Speaker 3: chipper god endemic Anddaemonian baffomet hermaphrodite. Dumazd's equivalent was to
Speaker 3: moose to mouse. In the Greek was known as Hermes.
Speaker 3: Hermes in Rome was known as Mercury, and Mercury traces
Speaker 3: directly back to Marduke and Bale. Don't believe me even
Speaker 3: further on, like a Spanish Dawn or the Italian movies
Speaker 3: with the Godfather means Lord Bail means Lord, what was
Speaker 3: Trump doing yesterday or the day before yesterday? McDonald's, Oh yeah,
Speaker 3: he was. And the Golden Arches are affiliated with Bail.
Speaker 3: I'm not joking. You can look that up. And again,
Speaker 3: where's of all the places he does oppose? I'm like
Speaker 3: really really so yeah, So this.
Speaker 1: Would suggest that everything that Trump does is entirely for
Speaker 1: the symbolic nature of it.
Speaker 3: All of them do it for the symbolic nature, but
Speaker 3: specifically with Trump, I'm finding a lot of ironies that
Speaker 3: he has a name etymology tracing directly back to the
Speaker 3: occult's messiah figure to Moos, not Christ, because they want
Speaker 3: to bring him back for the third RealD. That is
Speaker 3: actually the magician card. Like we showed before, you'd have
Speaker 3: Nimrod or the snake consuming itself over the magician's head.
Speaker 3: Need to have Nimrod to mouse, and then you have
Speaker 3: to have to moves to go back into Nimrod, which
Speaker 3: you look up. Baron Trump, the last president. You pick,
Speaker 3: take his picture of any photo you want, and you
Speaker 3: compare it alongside paintings of Lucifer, pretty striking resemblance.
Speaker 4: And I'll say this, did Trump or did he not
Speaker 4: have a kabbala teacher at one point in time.
Speaker 5: Yes, he quoted him before.
Speaker 3: In your Dany page one hundred and eighty eight, way
Speaker 3: to the top. That's Trump's own book. Yeah, and again
Speaker 3: I'm just stating this one. General Corton Wallace allegedly. Whether
Speaker 3: this is true or not, but Jonathan Williams was a
Speaker 3: guy that was close to Lincoln. He's hearing the surrender
Speaker 3: during the ten He writes a book in seventy eighty
Speaker 3: one called Legions of Satan, wherein Williams aveers that General
Speaker 3: Cornwallace revealed to Washington that during the surrender of Yorktown
Speaker 3: that in the future, the churches of the United States
Speaker 3: would be infiltrated and teach the Yu's religion. The churches
Speaker 3: would become auxiliary Masonic temples, and that fact would be
Speaker 3: kept secret from the church members. The Masonic churches would
Speaker 3: be working toward a world government. This author has been
Speaker 3: unable to verify the authenticity of the quote. The Williams
Speaker 3: u such as this is Edward Hendry from Bloody Zion.
Speaker 3: Cornwallis did not personally surrender to Washington during the surrender
Speaker 3: of ceremony in Yorktown, and there's no public record confirming
Speaker 3: William's account of Cornelisis speaking to Washington. That does not
Speaker 3: mean that such a conversation did not take place, so
Speaker 3: I can condense. But take a look at this.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, it does kind of look like the candle.
Speaker 3: Where's the Star of rem fan that's where we do
Speaker 3: the inaugural address? If that state of the Union and
Speaker 3: the Yu's religion, whether true or not, I'm just saying
Speaker 3: I see it in America all the time. Like I said,
Speaker 3: Helios from eastmeast west, this is Trump's penthouse apartment.
Speaker 4: I always looked at the Chamber of Congress to look
Speaker 4: like a Greek amphitheater.
Speaker 3: Yes, and on the outside, yes, But in the center
Speaker 3: is supposed to be the Jewish Council. And uh yeah,
Speaker 3: that's it. Dispensationless evangelicals sucking at they of the horror
Speaker 3: of Babylon. That is exactly what we got going on
Speaker 3: in America. And and God says, come out or for
Speaker 3: my people, shut out, shout out. I have for you, gentlemen.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry it was a little bit lengthy, but we
Speaker 3: had a little couple offshoots. But yeah, tough to ponder. Again.
Speaker 3: As I said before, I voted for Trump twice. So
Speaker 3: if anybody wants to write their mean little things, try
Speaker 3: to ask how TDS happened after eight years of voting
Speaker 3: for the guy or supporting him. That doesn't add up
Speaker 3: to their narrative.
Speaker 1: Wow, dude, it's uh, it's definitely a bunch to ponder on.
Speaker 1: And I think that you know, we've said it before,
Speaker 1: but like, you know, we're looking at Trump as kind
Speaker 1: of like a h a guy that's gonna come in
Speaker 1: and fix a lot of things, gonna stop a lot
Speaker 1: of wars, gonna gonna better the economy and lower inflation.
Speaker 1: Like there's a lot of promises based upon what he
Speaker 1: had already done in the past before COVID, And you know,
Speaker 1: he's one of the people who, you know, everybody was
Speaker 1: shouting at the roof from the rooftop saying that we
Speaker 1: needed a businessman and not a politician and so we
Speaker 1: got one and and look what he did and stuff
Speaker 1: like that. So I tell you what, dude, if all
Speaker 1: this ship comes true, I'm gonna start looking at.
Speaker 5: You like.
Speaker 1: A prophet. You might be a prophet on some real ship.
Speaker 3: Just a nut Jeb studying and living in as a
Speaker 3: hermit in a Kate what do you.
Speaker 1: I know, I mean, I hope you're totally wrong. I
Speaker 1: I hope, I hope that everything that you say is
Speaker 1: so wrong, Like I don't want that ship to happen.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: But this, dude, and that's the thing with with you know,
Speaker 1: us being a conspiracy channel. We pay a lot of
Speaker 1: attention to symbolism, and this is this is a symbolic
Speaker 1: load is really what.
Speaker 5: To quote? He did?
Speaker 3: He?
Speaker 5: This is that? Mind fuck? Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean he liked all the really, but.
Speaker 1: Brandon, let the good Cold members know where they can
Speaker 1: find you, uh, if they don't don't know our ready.
Speaker 3: If they want to watch this episode without our our
Speaker 3: our offshoot Tangents, I have an episode again when Nation
Speaker 3: under Satan. You can find on YouTube, Spotify, or Patreon
Speaker 3: with man a daily podcast, and then you can find
Speaker 3: me on Instagram with Chronology k r O l l Ology,
Speaker 3: Laura Underscore one oh one. That's if you're gonna be nice.
Speaker 3: I've been getting some people that hate me, and that's fine,
Speaker 3: but I don't you don't need to follow me or
Speaker 3: let me know that you hate me. I already know
Speaker 3: people hate me. I've had three death threats, so I'm
Speaker 3: all good on that front, So thank.
Speaker 5: You, dude.
Speaker 1: What a savage to get death threats and then just
Speaker 1: keep digging like.
Speaker 2: Pretty Uh it's commitment.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that is full on commitment. You gotta you gotta
Speaker 1: praise that.
Speaker 3: When people start threatening taking out your life from something
Speaker 3: you said, you know you've hit the big time and
Speaker 3: I'm not even in politics.
Speaker 1: That's a badge of honor rate there. So well, Brandon,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for coming on.
Speaker 5: Brother.
Speaker 1: We appreciate you spending so much time with us, doing
Speaker 1: it on two different and you already know you're welcome
Speaker 1: back anytime you got something new that you want to
Speaker 1: run on any other uh kind of digging that you're
Speaker 1: you're doing, You're you're great at it and uh, you're
Speaker 1: very well versed.
Speaker 2: You show the receipts and we appreciate that.
Speaker 1: That's why we keep on having you back on, dude,
Speaker 1: because it's it's knowledgeable and and look, I know that
Speaker 1: some people are gonna listen to this. Oh I don't
Speaker 1: agree with that. It's not about agreeing or disagreeing. Just listen,
Speaker 1: just hear it out, because what if you're wrong? Like
Speaker 1: nobody wants to ever think that, Like, what if what
Speaker 1: if you're wrong with your thoughts and your beliefs, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean.
Speaker 4: People get so mad at us, you and I for
Speaker 4: having guests on the show. It's like, y'all understand, we're
Speaker 4: also trying to get a Satanist on the show, right,
Speaker 4: like a real worshiper of the Dark Lord Satanist, because
Speaker 4: I would love to have a conversation with one of
Speaker 4: them to see, like, you know why, Like I I
Speaker 4: have so many fucking questions and not to like badger them,
Speaker 4: but I've never sat and had a conversation with one.
Speaker 1: I feel like, I feel like you're not going to
Speaker 1: like the response, but it's.
Speaker 4: Very possible, but like I still would use this platform
Speaker 4: to have that conversation.
Speaker 1: I feel like a lot of this is for I
Speaker 1: feel like a lot of Satanists are the same kind
Speaker 1: of people that are going to be voting for Kamala
Speaker 1: because it's because well not not just because of that,
Speaker 1: because I feel like, according to them, it's the lesser
Speaker 1: of two evils, and they're trying to piss off all
Speaker 1: the people that possibly piss them off.
Speaker 2: You know what I mean.
Speaker 1: And I think that it's more of a mean kind
Speaker 1: of thing although I do believe that people like for
Speaker 1: sure believe in Satan, which in my y'all know, I'm
Speaker 1: into a lot of the woo woo shit that is retarded.
Speaker 2: It's so dumb. It's like it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 5: You're very uh well not you.
Speaker 4: There's a lot of people that agree with you, and
Speaker 4: it's there's a fundamental difference, you know, just a fundamental
Speaker 4: difference of beliefs on this one. But Kamala to that point,
Speaker 4: you even brought up on the Live at her rat
Speaker 4: the guy in the crowd saying Jesus King he is Lord,
Speaker 4: and what she said, you're You're at the wrong rally.
Speaker 4: You need to be the one down the street. Now
Speaker 4: the Satanists love Kamala.
Speaker 1: Dude, Oh yeah, dude, Time.
Speaker 3: Counter Brino and Bramovich. She's the one that supported Trump
Speaker 3: saying that he's actually waking up the masses.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm curious what she's thinking these things, isn't she?
Speaker 5: And uh isn't she?
Speaker 4: And Ukraine still is the head of education there or whatever,
Speaker 4: And seeing is how Trump is saying he's gonna cut
Speaker 4: off funding the Ukraine, I'm curious what she thinks about
Speaker 4: him currently.
Speaker 1: Time will tell With all of this stuff, it's only speculation,
Speaker 1: it's only ruffling feathers until the future becomes now and
Speaker 1: and we receive the present, and so I guess I
Speaker 1: guess we'll see. No, I mean we can. We can
Speaker 1: have a dick measuring contest and talk about who's right
Speaker 1: and who's wrong. As far as like, well hypotheticals here,
Speaker 1: bro this is strictly hypothetic.
Speaker 2: No course of course.
Speaker 1: But you know some people they hear something that they
Speaker 1: disagree with and they're like, fuck you. It's like, why
Speaker 1: has it automatically got to go to fuck you because
Speaker 1: I disagree with you?
Speaker 5: You know what I mean?
Speaker 4: This is why we have this program. This is why
Speaker 4: I want to invite a Satanist. This is why we
Speaker 4: invite people with so many different beliefs and different opinions
Speaker 4: on shit.
Speaker 5: This is why Brandon Kroll comes on.
Speaker 4: To tell us what he has found, what his research
Speaker 4: has shown him. Where else but a Cult of Conspiracy
Speaker 4: podcast would he come?
Speaker 5: You know what I mean? Look what we do.
Speaker 1: The two hosts of this show don't agree with each
Speaker 1: other most of the time, talking about me and you, Jacob,
Speaker 1: like we this is never ever ever going to be
Speaker 1: an echo chamber at all, like, and that includes the
Speaker 1: guests that we have on that maybe we disagree with.
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't want to say I disagree with you.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying I hope you're wrong, Brandon. That's where
Speaker 1: I can go.
Speaker 5: You know what I mean, Like, I want to be right.
Speaker 1: I mean, what is there to disagree with? You're you're
Speaker 1: showing receipts, Like, how can I disagree with receipts kind
Speaker 1: of thing? But but either way, Brandon, thank you so much.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 1: You're you're the man, and we cannot wait to have
Speaker 1: you back on Jacob. Can we get some knife fans
Speaker 1: up in here.
Speaker 5: If you have it already. Dear cult members, please at
Speaker 5: this time hit the five star, hit the shd the
Speaker 5: li like, suscribe.
Speaker 4: To comment, leave a post, leave review, shares with the
Speaker 4: friends of family, shares everywhere.
Speaker 5: Here's the deal.
Speaker 4: The more activity the algorithms see across all of our
Speaker 4: listening platforms, the more we get promoted to more potential
Speaker 4: listeners who could then become potential cult.
Speaker 5: Members like the rest of you. Finallyies and gentlemen. While
Speaker 5: you're at it, go check out meta mysteries.
Speaker 4: Give Jonathan's other show, All the Loves, the five Stars,
Speaker 4: the Shares, the reviews. Go check out all of Brandon
Speaker 4: Krahl's projects. Check them out. Do not send hatred, don't
Speaker 4: be dicks, be good people. Help boost the algorithms, help
Speaker 4: us grow all the things we have going on.
Speaker 5: Go check out the YouTube channel Cajun Knight. Go subscribe
Speaker 5: over there.
Speaker 4: The vlog, the video log of the trip that Jonathan
Speaker 4: and I are taking tomorrow is going to.
Speaker 5: Be up as soon as we get back and it
Speaker 5: gets edited down. I promise, we thank if everybody's already
Speaker 5: gone and done so.
Speaker 1: And with that being said, this one, there's another beautiful
Speaker 1: episode of the Cults of Conspiracy. And my name is
Speaker 1: Jonathan Jack. And there's one very born, extremely vital piece
Speaker 1: of information we need to learn just as soon as
Speaker 1: humanly possible. To speaks see so to speak,