Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the seventh of October.
Speaker 1: Here of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, we're hitting
Speaker 1: the one year anniversary of the October seventh attack, and
Speaker 1: the Middle East is about to explore. With the cheerleading
Speaker 1: of both Democrats and the Republicans, we're going to begin
Speaker 1: today by talking about the war against us again, more
Speaker 1: developments of what is happening here in Tennessee and nearby
Speaker 1: in North Carolina, and how we have been utterly abandoned
Speaker 1: by our own government as we expected, and it is
Speaker 1: very important for us to understand what this is going
Speaker 1: to look like. We're also going to take a look
Speaker 1: at hyperinflation in Lebanon, which is unrelated to the war,
Speaker 1: and the war's just going to add to that. It's
Speaker 1: a harbinger of what's to come for us as well.
Speaker 1: We're going to take a look at that. But there's
Speaker 1: also some hopeful news. A new story has emerged about
Speaker 1: how a share fought back against the germ game by
Speaker 1: deputizing everybody, and many other cases. We're going to talk
Speaker 1: about things that can be done outside of the election.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back well again as we look at
Speaker 1: what is happening here and of the push to not
Speaker 1: do anything for a week, FEMA didn't do anything. Then
Speaker 1: when they started doing something, they made it even worse.
Speaker 1: As I played last week, multiple eyewitness stories on the
Speaker 1: ground talking about how whether it is FEMA or whether
Speaker 1: it's state or whether it's local, they're obstructing rescue operations,
Speaker 1: they're confiscating stuff. Now FEMA is coming out saying that's disinformation.
Speaker 1: Of course, I'm going to say that it took them
Speaker 1: several days to even bother. They don't really care what
Speaker 1: you think, and so we see that happening in Handy
Speaker 1: sent this to me and said, pray, pray, pray. He said,
Speaker 1: I just put out a post on Facebook and on
Speaker 1: next door for the people in North Carolina. He says,
Speaker 1: it's been an hour and now I've already got two
Speaker 1: orders for two hundred dollars worth of supplies at Walmart
Speaker 1: to pick up, with more in the works. Keep praying
Speaker 1: for us, please, We're going to sneak into North Carolina
Speaker 1: with a trailer of supplies next Friday. Pray that we
Speaker 1: can make it to where we need to go. And
Speaker 1: so again there is something that you can do. I
Speaker 1: trust Handy, you can trust some of these other organizations
Speaker 1: I talked about on Friday as well. And then as
Speaker 1: we look at things that we trust in, institutions that
Speaker 1: we trust in, things that we lean on that will
Speaker 1: then piercing our hand, break and pierce our hand, insurance
Speaker 1: is one of those. And so as they're saying, the
Speaker 1: insurance companies, Wall Street Journal had a very long article
Speaker 1: about this. So a lot of people are going to
Speaker 1: be rare upset when they go to apply for help
Speaker 1: because the insurance company is going to play this game.
Speaker 1: You didn't have flood insurance, Yeah that's it. Yeah, that's right,
Speaker 1: you didn't have flood. Wait a minute, it knocked trees
Speaker 1: down on my house. Yeah, well you know that's because
Speaker 1: of flood, and we're not going to This is happening
Speaker 1: all over the place. A lot of people, certainly in
Speaker 1: this area, did not expect they were going to have
Speaker 1: a hurricane of this magnitude. You kind of expect that
Speaker 1: in areas like Tampa, and home policies there reflect that
Speaker 1: type of thing. People know to get flood insurance. A
Speaker 1: lot of people in these areas didn't think about that.
Speaker 1: Although and that hasn't been a problem for quite some time,
Speaker 1: it used to be a regular problem going back one
Speaker 1: hundred years ago. It was one of the first FDR
Speaker 1: projects to come in and set up the TVA, which
Speaker 1: I'm not a big fan of, but they were able
Speaker 1: to stop the flooding with a series of dams until
Speaker 1: something like this happened. A massive amount of water, and
Speaker 1: of course of the topography, the mountainous topography, when you
Speaker 1: get a massive amount of water, doll gets concentrated into
Speaker 1: certain areas, and that's what we've seen. So they said,
Speaker 1: a lot of people, even if they have insurance, are
Speaker 1: going to find out they've got a three to five
Speaker 1: percent deductible, which means that if you're looking at something
Speaker 1: they The example may use is a million dollar home.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of the people in this area
Speaker 1: don't have a million dollar home. But if you had
Speaker 1: a million dollar home, you have fifty thousand dollars worth
Speaker 1: of losses. But let's say that it's closer to what
Speaker 1: the average cost is nationwide, and say half a million dollars,
Speaker 1: are you still looking at twenty five thousand dollars out
Speaker 1: of pocket? You got that, you got fifteen thousand. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you got a three hundred thousand dollar home, you
Speaker 1: got fifteen thousand dollars. There's a lot of potential for
Speaker 1: litigation on claims that then Ensure takes a hard line,
Speaker 1: says it was one hundred percent flood damage even though
Speaker 1: the wind was blowing very hard. Said. Two years after
Speaker 1: Hurricane in slammed into Florida, nearly fifty thousand claims remain unresolved,
Speaker 1: including more than eighteen thousand where no payments have been made,
Speaker 1: according to state data there. Well, speaking of Florida, one
Speaker 1: of the hopeful things that we've seen because what DeSantis
Speaker 1: is doing, as we see FEMA going from a wall
Speaker 1: to obstruction. DeSantis has said they're not going to be
Speaker 1: involved here that federal delays and everything else that they're doing.
Speaker 1: And look, we have seen this reported now Elon Musk
Speaker 1: and as starlink guys reported it. We've seen many other
Speaker 1: people report what had happened with other hurricanes. One guy
Speaker 1: talking about when I went through the Florida keys, he
Speaker 1: said they sealed off, wouldn't let them help people, even
Speaker 1: though they'd collected a lot of supplies. He said, we
Speaker 1: went eighty seven miles over water to sneak into the area.
Speaker 1: And once we got in, the first guy we saw
Speaker 1: was just elated to see that relief had come. And
Speaker 1: then he found out why they weren't getting relief, the
Speaker 1: fact that they had blocked anybody from getting into that area,
Speaker 1: and then we're not delivering anything. He said, the most
Speaker 1: that they would do is come around and have one
Speaker 1: box of canned food per household from the government. That's
Speaker 1: what they're going to do when they lock us down,
Speaker 1: when they use universal basic income. That's exactly how this
Speaker 1: is going to look. This is a harbinger, folks, of
Speaker 1: what they plan for us when you look at their
Speaker 1: response to this tragedy. And so he said, the guy
Speaker 1: went from being elated and happy in tears furious. And
Speaker 1: he said they still had a radio station that was broadcasting,
Speaker 1: and so he said, you got to come with me
Speaker 1: to the radio station and tell people here what's happening.
Speaker 1: And they did, and so he said, eventually they went
Speaker 1: in and they were able to speak to FEMA and
Speaker 1: the people running it, and they said, well, we're not
Speaker 1: letting you bring anything in because you're not one of
Speaker 1: the preferred vendors. And so forth, and so he goes,
Speaker 1: that's it, it's about money. Well, I don't agree with that. Yes,
Speaker 1: it is about money. It's about money because it's about
Speaker 1: their position and their power and their bureaucracy. That kind
Speaker 1: of money really more than anything else. And we have
Speaker 1: seen this type of thing. As I point out, my
Speaker 1: son Whistler did a I did a thing talking about
Speaker 1: how it worked out when FEMA was involved on the
Speaker 1: coast versus with a hurricane that was very large, versus
Speaker 1: a small, localized disaster from a tornado, how that was
Speaker 1: all handled by individuals and by volunteer help, and how
Speaker 1: much better that worked, and talked to people who had
Speaker 1: experienced both of these things. This has been the mo
Speaker 1: o for FEMA for a long time, and it's time
Speaker 1: that we stop accepting as set in concrete, carved in stone,
Speaker 1: these government bureaucracies. They haven't been around forever, and that
Speaker 1: you can't find them in the constitution, and they're not
Speaker 1: accountable to us, and it's unconscionable what they're doing. FEMA again,
Speaker 1: was created in nineteen seventy eight by Jimmy Carter. He
Speaker 1: created FEMA, he created the Department of Energy, he created
Speaker 1: the Department of Education. You know, he is one hundred
Speaker 1: years old, and they're talking about how he's going to
Speaker 1: this is going to be his last election. He's going
Speaker 1: to vote for LA Law. They wheel him out one
Speaker 1: anniversary's one on his birthday, and he was just in
Speaker 1: a catistanic, catatonic state. He's not with us anymore. I
Speaker 1: mean his eyes were closed, his mouth is open, he
Speaker 1: didn't move. You tell me that he knows even knows
Speaker 1: who's running it, doesn't know anything. They're going to vote
Speaker 1: for him. But I think he's hanging on because he's
Speaker 1: got a lot to answer for God by creating a
Speaker 1: Department of Energy, FEMA and the Department of Education, and
Speaker 1: I mean it, I'm not joking. And these are institutions
Speaker 1: that have created unbelievable misery and suffering. So yeah, you
Speaker 1: hang on to that life that you've got it because
Speaker 1: you're going to have to answer for what you did someday.
Speaker 1: But getting to the good side of this Dysantis and
Speaker 1: you know, DeSantis has been somebody that does more than
Speaker 1: speech is imposturing. He's been one of the most effective,
Speaker 1: well by far and away, the most effective a governor
Speaker 1: we've got right now. Yeah, his response to all the
Speaker 1: germ game stuff was delayed, it was incomplete. His attack
Speaker 1: on free speech, turning it into a hate crime so
Speaker 1: he can get money from Israel was beyond reprehensible. And
Speaker 1: so there's not anybody that I support and I did
Speaker 1: not support him because of that. Free speech is essential
Speaker 1: and if you're willing to sell that out to Israel,
Speaker 1: and just think about the fact that this evil government
Speaker 1: in Israel is so focused on taking away our free
Speaker 1: speech and the free speech of the people in their
Speaker 1: country and on vaccinating their people. Look, Israel is not
Speaker 1: the Israel a Bible. This is the Israel of net Yahoo,
Speaker 1: a globalist, megamoniacal criminal who vaccinated his own people, who
Speaker 1: has sustained a war beyond any reason, and now is
Speaker 1: expanding that war. So again, letting them to overwrite our
Speaker 1: First Amendment, that's a big deal. But let's praise him
Speaker 1: for the correct stuff he does. Is let's criticize him
Speaker 1: for what he does is wrong, and let's praise him
Speaker 1: for what he did that's right. And what he is
Speaker 1: doing here is what every governor should do in this
Speaker 1: particular case. Female you're not going to be involved here,
Speaker 1: We're going to take care of it ourselves. You're in
Speaker 1: the way, get out of the way. You have no
Speaker 1: authority to be here. See that's the key you when
Speaker 1: we talk about federal government encroachment. I've said, the rightful
Speaker 1: response to this is not to get all tied up
Speaker 1: in a presidential election. The rightful response to this is
Speaker 1: not to go grab your gun and start a civil war.
Speaker 1: The rightful response to this is state nullification. A federal
Speaker 1: government overreach when they create these unconstitutional agencies for which
Speaker 1: they have no authority, in defiance of both the ninth
Speaker 1: and the tenth Amendment. It's time for somebody to stand
Speaker 1: up and say no. We could have saved sixty three
Speaker 1: million children from being torn to pieces over a period
Speaker 1: of fifty years if the Governor of Texas had said,
Speaker 1: after the Supreme Court issued at Ts Roe v. Wade,
Speaker 1: think you don't have the authority to decide when life begins.
Speaker 1: That belongs to the states under the ninth and tenth Amendment.
Speaker 1: But they didn't, and it took fifty years for the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court to say exactly that what I've been saying
Speaker 1: for the longest time. So here's DeSantis taking matters into
Speaker 1: his own hands. With relief after federal and competence and obstruction.
Speaker 1: And you know, so DeSantis is charting a roadmap for
Speaker 1: state governors to take important issues into their own hands
Speaker 1: in the face of perceived federal government and action or
Speaker 1: bad action. And that's the important thing. That's the comment
Speaker 1: from just the news and that is the important thing.
Speaker 1: He's setting a precedent, which is very important to say, governors,
Speaker 1: we don't have to do everything that the federal government says.
Speaker 1: And you know, we don't have to be bought by
Speaker 1: their fiat currency to obey their Fiat orders. You're just
Speaker 1: making up their money out of thin air, and their
Speaker 1: orders are just being made up as well. They're ruling
Speaker 1: by Fiat, by bribery, by blackmail, but they're also ruling
Speaker 1: by Fiat just saying this is what I say, do
Speaker 1: what I say, the laws in my mouth. That's a dictatorship, folks.
Speaker 1: We don't want the federal government as a dictator, and
Speaker 1: we don't want the dictator bribing and blackmailing people with
Speaker 1: its Fiat money. So, as they point out, there was
Speaker 1: a lot of damage in Florida, not as much as
Speaker 1: was in I mean, fewer people lost their power there
Speaker 1: and then they did further north. But as they point out,
Speaker 1: he took care of things there, and then he sent
Speaker 1: National Guard up to help in North Carolina and in Georgia.
Speaker 1: I think, but I remember the very beginning of this,
Speaker 1: people were saying, so grateful to have DeSantis's Florida National
Speaker 1: Guard here. They did more to help people. DeSantis's Florida
Speaker 1: National Guard did more to help people than Democrat Roy
Speaker 1: Cooper North Carolina's National Guard did. After mobilizing resources to
Speaker 1: help its own state and restoring power to most of
Speaker 1: his residents in only a few days, DeSantis contrasted his
Speaker 1: state's response to the slower federal response and other suffering states.
Speaker 1: He said, this is overwhelmingly stayed and local, and that's
Speaker 1: how we view it. We don't want to be waiting
Speaker 1: on the Feds. We have to be able to lean in.
Speaker 1: The governor touted how he was able to mobilize state
Speaker 1: resources to respond weeks before FEMA would have been able
Speaker 1: to and so when he sent his National Guard troops
Speaker 1: up to North Carolina and to I guess he called
Speaker 1: it Operation Blue Ridge. After tending to his own backyard,
Speaker 1: he deployed his own Florida state and National Guard resources
Speaker 1: to help rescue and recovery efforts in North Carolina and
Speaker 1: Tennessee this week. He said the federal government should be
Speaker 1: more focused on getting resources to those states where many
Speaker 1: are still stranded without reliable access to food or fresh water,
Speaker 1: and the number of deaths is unknown and folks who
Speaker 1: have to understand people have died because of lack of help.
Speaker 1: Federal government doesn't care. So pointed out last week, you
Speaker 1: know they're setting around standby in hotel rooms, getting paid
Speaker 1: eighty one hundred dollars a week. He called it Operation
Speaker 1: Blue Ridge. The governor said he wanted to quote answer
Speaker 1: the call for Americans when the federal government fails to act. Again,
Speaker 1: as I said before, we praise these people when they
Speaker 1: do the right thing. We criticize them for the wrong thing,
Speaker 1: and this is absolutely the right thing. One Florida Guard
Speaker 1: member deployed in North Carolina to whole Fox News that
Speaker 1: he was observing a quote failure of leadership in North Carolina,
Speaker 1: a void that DeSantis has worked to fill. He said,
Speaker 1: there's a complete failure of leadership here in North Carolina
Speaker 1: and from the federal government. If it wasn't for DeSantis's
Speaker 1: rescue would have never happened. Days after the Santus's order,
Speaker 1: the Biden White House announced that Biden had ordered deployment
Speaker 1: of a thousand active duties soldiers. Not clear that that
Speaker 1: has happened yet. We still don't know, you know, have
Speaker 1: they done something about that or not we have On
Speaker 1: a comment from Michael Paul, my sister's home insurance has
Speaker 1: doubled in Florida in only two years. Yeah, that's one
Speaker 1: way they can drive us out of our homes. It's
Speaker 1: the one way they can drive us out of our cars. Insurance.
Speaker 1: And so you know, that is something that the insurance
Speaker 1: companies are a good example yet another example of crony
Speaker 1: capitalism and of economic fascism, where you've got a merger
Speaker 1: between the insurance companies in the state. An insurance company
Speaker 1: forces you in many cases to get insurance you're not allowed.
Speaker 1: I remember when I was one place I worked, a
Speaker 1: guy went out and got a very high end Rice
Speaker 1: Rocket motorcycle really fast, and it cost him like twenty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. And this is about fifteen years ago, and
Speaker 1: he said his insurance that he was compelled to buy
Speaker 1: was going to be it was going to be more
Speaker 1: than he was going to pay for his bike several
Speaker 1: times over over just a couple of years. He says,
Speaker 1: it's absolutely ridiculous. He said that how can they justify
Speaker 1: this because it's more than my payments on my bike
Speaker 1: for insurance. And he says, I'm not there to harm
Speaker 1: other people. And he goes and if they have to
Speaker 1: replace my bike, if I totaled it and if he
Speaker 1: was still alive, he said, how can they justify charging
Speaker 1: me that much money? But they do that. So anyway,
Speaker 1: that's how they get us out of our homes, out
Speaker 1: of our cars. So when we hang on just one second.
Speaker 1: Here the thing though, as we look at DeSantis, if
Speaker 1: we go to the opposite side, one of the most
Speaker 1: despicable things that I have seen is what Lindsey Graham
Speaker 1: did when he went on with Sean Hannity. Sean Hannity
Speaker 1: is talking about what's going on with a port strike,
Speaker 1: He's talking about what's going on and with a hurricane victims,
Speaker 1: and immediately Lindsey Graham pivots to Israel. You can think trumps.
Speaker 3: You know, I've been going all over South Carolina, like
Speaker 3: most people haven't slept much.
Speaker 1: But look what's going on in Israel.
Speaker 3: Our friends in Israel surrounded by people that want to
Speaker 3: kill them, destroy them, a second Holocaust in the making.
Speaker 3: And Biden says, be proportional. What is the proportional response
Speaker 3: to people want to kill you and your family. They're
Speaker 3: running out of ammunition in Israel. We have to help
Speaker 3: our friends to keep the war over there from coming here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, got to help our friends. Well, you know what, Lindsay,
Speaker 1: these people have been It's like a war has happened
Speaker 1: here and you don't care. And Lindsay won't care when
Speaker 1: the bombs come here either, He won't care. It'll still
Speaker 1: be about his friends in Israel. You're not his friend.
Speaker 1: His friends have a completely different agenda. And I've never
Speaker 1: seen a more despicable a person than Lindsey Graham. It's
Speaker 1: not enough to push war and destruction everywhere everywhere, and
Speaker 1: yet he can't as soon as you talk about helping
Speaker 1: people the United States. He's as bad or worse than
Speaker 1: Biden and Lawla. He doesn't even they're not even ashamed
Speaker 1: of what is happening. Listen to this person who was
Speaker 1: on the ground, a survivor, who's trying to help, but
Speaker 1: talking about the damage. This is the kind of person
Speaker 1: that Lindsey Graham doesn't care about.
Speaker 4: Hey, guys, I'm in western North Carolina and we're working
Speaker 4: on day six and we still have rescue choppers flying overhead.
Speaker 4: I still have I think I've got a little bit
Speaker 4: of survivor's guilt that our tunnel is spared.
Speaker 2: We need to help.
Speaker 4: A whole town was wiped out and I'm talking about
Speaker 4: everybody was killed. Okay, the fucking.
Speaker 1: Media is lying to you.
Speaker 4: And when we need the help, we need a bad.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 4: We can't go help. We can't go save anybody. We've
Speaker 4: been threatened, we will get arrested. I can't imagine the
Speaker 4: people that are still up there.
Speaker 2: Holding on.
Speaker 4: To survive. I mean, we still got electric trucks going
Speaker 4: all over the place here, We've got trees down, a
Speaker 4: tree on my house in the back.
Speaker 6: But it's incredible. It's incredible that we the people are
Speaker 6: willing to let the government tell us that we.
Speaker 4: Are not allowed to save our own people.
Speaker 6: Their bodies everywhere up there floating around that the town
Speaker 6: was wiped.
Speaker 4: Out completely, everybody killed, and.
Speaker 6: The only people saving them are the people that are
Speaker 6: there saving each other.
Speaker 4: And then they're all stuck together.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, you know, Lindsey Graham doesn't care about a
Speaker 1: innocent life anywhere? Does He certainly doesn't have a heart
Speaker 1: for his own people. My friends in Israel surrounded by people,
Speaker 1: won't kill them, destroy them? Well, you know what, we've
Speaker 1: had people killed and destroyed, sounds destroyed. All he can
Speaker 1: think of is war. War is his passion. War everywhere
Speaker 1: for any reason is the passion of Lindsey Graham. And
Speaker 1: so he asks, you know, Lindsey says, so, so, what's
Speaker 1: a proportional response to people who want to kill you
Speaker 1: and your family? What is a proportional response to Lindsay Graham?
Speaker 1: People of South Carolina? What is your response to Lindsey Graham?
Speaker 1: Because that's what he is about. What is a proportional
Speaker 1: response to somebody wants to kill everybody everywhere? Doesn't have
Speaker 1: any compassion for the people in his own state or
Speaker 1: nearby states, doesn't care. It's all about his empire and
Speaker 1: his geopolitics, and his geopolitics is one of war, war everywhere.
Speaker 1: And again, as he goes from Israel, he says, and
Speaker 1: then Biden slow walking weapons in Ukraine? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1: So much money for weapons in Ukraine? And Israel, and
Speaker 1: we don't have any left for Americans. So as he
Speaker 1: was saying, this guy who said he had some survivor guilt, well,
Speaker 1: he said, we're letting government tell us that we can't
Speaker 1: help our own people. The only people who are saving
Speaker 1: them are the ones who are there. I said for
Speaker 1: the longest time, this is going to be what happens
Speaker 1: as our governments everywhere, not just in America, but every country.
Speaker 1: Our intent on creating divide and conquer, chaos, unrest, with
Speaker 1: open borders and massive immigration, and with war, with financial collapse.
Speaker 1: All that they're doing is set up to create chaos.
Speaker 1: So of course they're going to sit on the sidelines
Speaker 1: or they are going to obstruct. Graham made the same
Speaker 1: pivot on X earlier this week. He said Congress needs
Speaker 1: to quote reconvened to pass us upmental package for a
Speaker 1: damage done to southeast by Hurricane Helen, also to provide
Speaker 1: missile defense assistants Israel under attack from Iranian regime. We
Speaker 1: kind of know how this is going to happen, don't we.
Speaker 1: When they finally get together and talk about this, it'll
Speaker 1: be like what they did when you had Mike Johnson say,
Speaker 1: all right, I'll give you money for your war in Ukraine,
Speaker 1: but you're going to have to do something to protect
Speaker 1: the border. And then after posturing with that for a
Speaker 1: couple of months, he gave up on money for the border,
Speaker 1: just gave him what they wanted for Ukraine. That's what's
Speaker 1: going to happen with this. Over the past three months,
Speaker 1: Graham has introduced multiple bills aimed at launching a war
Speaker 1: with Iran. That's what he has always wanted to do.
Speaker 1: And in twenty twenty one, he flew to Israel to
Speaker 1: meet Natanyahu literally held up a sign there it is
Speaker 1: right there, demanding more for Israel, more for Israel, less
Speaker 1: for America, more for Israel. Lindsay is a one man
Speaker 1: hurricane of death, destruction and war, isn't he? At home
Speaker 1: and abroad? He cares less good, care less. Wine Press
Speaker 1: News says calls him a soulless warmonger. Well, he does
Speaker 1: have a soul. He has no compassion, but he has
Speaker 1: a soul. He will have to answer for this one day.
Speaker 1: As wine Press said, there is not a single war
Speaker 1: this fiend doesn't love, and he's frothing at the mouth
Speaker 1: to start new ones all the time, all the time. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so well this is happening. MTG is bragging about the
Speaker 1: fact that the head of FEMA is going to get
Speaker 1: the full Kimberly cheetle treatment, probably worse. She says, Oh boy,
Speaker 1: a tongue lashing. You mean a tongue lashing. She's going
Speaker 1: to go in and she's going to We're going to
Speaker 1: really criticize her as we keep giving him money. And
Speaker 1: of course if they do appropriate any funds, it'll be
Speaker 1: channeled through the sticky fingers of FEMA and the wasteful
Speaker 1: Swiss cheese type of holes. And their budget, well, that's
Speaker 1: going to be just great. They're going to hold a
Speaker 1: lot of TV trials and everything while people are still
Speaker 1: dying and suffering, homeless, without water and all the rest
Speaker 1: of the stuff. The government, folks is useless, and that
Speaker 1: includes these Republicans like Marjorie Taylor Green because what she's
Speaker 1: doing in terms of saying, well, we're going to really
Speaker 1: make her, We're going to embarrass her a lot. At
Speaker 1: the same time, she starts talking about they can control
Speaker 1: the weather. She said, and look, I think they can,
Speaker 1: but this is not the time to talk about that.
Speaker 1: What you need to be doing because this is going
Speaker 1: to be a distraction. And when you then criticize FEMA
Speaker 1: and keep funding them, of course, but even your criticism
Speaker 1: of FEMA will be cast in the light of well,
Speaker 1: these people are just stupid. They think the government intensified
Speaker 1: the storm and steered it to these people, and they're
Speaker 1: telling us that FEMA is not doing anything. They just
Speaker 1: completely this is nothing but misinformation, disinformation, credible sources. That's
Speaker 1: what she's doing. And I think that's even more reponsible.
Speaker 1: I think it's foolish. Right now, there's a time to
Speaker 1: talk about weather modification of these other things. But right
Speaker 1: now what you need to talk about is defunding FEMA.
Speaker 1: You need to talk about cutting that off and cutting
Speaker 1: it out. You don't need FEMA, you know, the government,
Speaker 1: the government can just President can just declare an emergency
Speaker 1: and give a block grant of money. That's the way
Speaker 1: it was always done all my life. I mean, we
Speaker 1: had a storm after storm coming through Florida. That's what
Speaker 1: the federal government would do if they wanted to help.
Speaker 1: The declare an emergency, give a block grant of money.
Speaker 1: You didn't need to have FEMA there. FEMA doesn't help
Speaker 1: anything again. Nineteen seventy eight Jimmy Carter, and it was
Speaker 1: the wrong thing to do. Well. Harris is slammed for
Speaker 1: pledging millions of dollars to Lebanon as North Carolina suffers.
Speaker 1: See no different, I'm going to give money to Lebanon.
Speaker 1: Oh maybe she means Lebanon, Tennessee. No, that's further out
Speaker 1: in the middle of the state. They weren't affected. How
Speaker 1: about Lebanon township in North Carolina, right there in Durham. No,
Speaker 1: she hadn't mean that either. Nothing for Americans. No, we're
Speaker 1: going to give money to Lebanon. Now, maybe you know
Speaker 1: we're gonna go to war with Lebanon, but let's give
Speaker 1: Lebanon some money as well. Now, let's fund both sides
Speaker 1: of this. That's what the federal government frequently does, giving
Speaker 1: money to both sides, even giving arms to both sides.
Speaker 1: We had the federal government was giving arms to ISIS
Speaker 1: in the past as they were fighting ISIS. So still
Speaker 1: no compassion for anyone who is American. La La plaged
Speaker 1: millions of dollars in aid for Lebanon. At the same time,
Speaker 1: residents of North Carolina struggled to recover from Hurricane Helena,
Speaker 1: who we're told, hey, we have the money. Yeah. One person,
Speaker 1: James Woods, says this has to be fake, even La
Speaker 1: La Harris, the gold standard of stupidity. Isn't stupid enough
Speaker 1: to post this? Certainly not while North Carolinians are pulling
Speaker 1: bodies of their neighbors from the wreckage. It's simply inconceivable.
Speaker 1: He did that in response to Harris bludging Saturday to
Speaker 1: send one hundred and fifty seven million dollars of additional
Speaker 1: assistance in Lebanon, which you argued is facing increasingly dire
Speaker 1: humanitarian situation. Humanitarian situation, you don't think so. Where we are,
Speaker 1: you don't think so. In North Carolina, Tennessee. Absolute contempt
Speaker 1: for Americans exhibited by our federal government. And folks, look,
Speaker 1: FEMA has it's a bipartisan thing, you know, it's like
Speaker 1: the ATF. Yeah, it's the Democrats really weaponize up of
Speaker 1: the Republicans leave it there and they help as well.
Speaker 1: You know, when you go back and you look at
Speaker 1: the ATF, the Randy Weaver situation Waco, it's the same ATF.
Speaker 1: One of them happened under George H. W. Bush. The
Speaker 1: other one happened under Clinton. But it was the same people,
Speaker 1: same people from the ATF. These bureaucracies are eternal. And
Speaker 1: what you have here are the deck chairs on the
Speaker 1: Titanic being changed, and everybody is fighting over whose deck
Speaker 1: chairs are going to be put out? Is it going
Speaker 1: to be the Republicans of the Democrats? Which deck chairs
Speaker 1: are going to put out? This election? She said, I'm
Speaker 1: concerned about the security and well being a civilians suffering
Speaker 1: in Loban. Not about Americans, you say, She said, the
Speaker 1: money would go to essential needs such as food, shelter,
Speaker 1: water protection, sanitation to help those who have been displaced
Speaker 1: by the recent conflict. America. Last, if it's America at all,
Speaker 1: representative of Nick Langworthy, Republican New York said, could this
Speaker 1: be any more tone deaf? We have Americans suffering and
Speaker 1: in danger right now after the hurricane, and this is
Speaker 1: what she has to announce. Journalist Eric Doughry said, to
Speaker 1: be clear of La LA's campaign suicidal posts this evening,
Speaker 1: focusing on Lebanon while major disaster rescues and recovery underway
Speaker 1: isn't a mission. She's losing Michigan right now. We'll have
Speaker 1: to see can the Trump campaign focus on this? Would
Speaker 1: they or is it just about his identity politics as
Speaker 1: well his celebrity status. And quite frankly, I don't believe
Speaker 1: that the elections are going to be determined by the
Speaker 1: people who show up. That the people who vote don't count.
Speaker 1: It's the people who count the votes that's set the
Speaker 1: election and the people in the background that select them.
Speaker 1: What they're trying, they're playing more chaos and division games
Speaker 1: with us with this election, and they're also trying to
Speaker 1: build a consensus. That's what this is about. But this
Speaker 1: particular election is not even about building a consensus. What
Speaker 1: it is manufacturing the consensus. What it really is is
Speaker 1: about dividing the country red and blue, Republican Democrat, left
Speaker 1: and right. So people want to fight each other, both
Speaker 1: sides being assured by their media that their guy is
Speaker 1: going to win. That's what we're headed for. But she's
Speaker 1: outing giving money to the people Elebanon while stiff arming
Speaker 1: the humanitarian crisis in North Carolina, says Texas Governor Abbitt.
Speaker 1: But you know they're all quiet about Lindsay Graham, weren't they.
Speaker 1: They'll talk about Lalyers, but they won't mention Lindsey Graham
Speaker 1: is is bad or worse. This is the parlor tricks
Speaker 1: that they play with us with partisan politics. Trump called
Speaker 1: the FEMA response the most incompetently managed storm at the
Speaker 1: federal level I've ever seen before. Well again, is he
Speaker 1: talking about defunding FEMA? No, he will keep it going. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson, as I pointed out before, I said, when
Speaker 1: they get together, what do you think he's going to
Speaker 1: do in terms of money. I think he's going to
Speaker 1: do the same thing he did with a border. He'll capitulate,
Speaker 1: give money to the empire, to the military industrial complex,
Speaker 1: intelligence community, and the rest of these people, and do
Speaker 1: nothing for Americans. I think he's as bad as La Law,
Speaker 1: part of the anti christ Union Party, both of them.
Speaker 1: House Speaker Mike Johnson, the Louisiana Republicans, said on Sunday
Speaker 1: that he does not intend to call Congress out of
Speaker 1: recess to vote on emergency funding for federal agencies assisting
Speaker 1: and Hurricane Helen recovery efforts. There's no rush. He didn't care.
Speaker 1: It's as urgent to him as it is to FEMA.
Speaker 1: What's the hurry. I'm not calling people out of recess.
Speaker 1: This is an election year. We're busy. We're busy out
Speaker 1: there getting votes. I'm not going to come back and
Speaker 1: talk about giving him money to people who've been hurt
Speaker 1: by the hurricane. He says, that's thirty days from now,
Speaker 1: thirty days from now to the election, after they're finished
Speaker 1: with what's really important to them, which is their reelection.
Speaker 1: So I say, forget about federal government. The federal government
Speaker 1: has gone completely feral. It's like a wild pack of dogs,
Speaker 1: and you just got to be careful that they don't
Speaker 1: attack you and understand where the points of attack are.
Speaker 1: He said. The thing about these hurricanes and disasters that
Speaker 1: this magnitude, it takes a while to calculate the actual damages.
Speaker 1: So until you give me a number, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to help you with any of this stuff. How about
Speaker 1: that come back and you know, make come up with
Speaker 1: some number, and then we'll do something that's never the
Speaker 1: way that it's worked before. You might want to start
Speaker 1: giving some aid now, and you might want to start
Speaker 1: thinking about focusing on local and state issues. These people
Speaker 1: local can make things worse, and we've seen a lot
Speaker 1: of videos done by people at the local level. I
Speaker 1: spend a lot of time. I'm not going to show
Speaker 1: you the follow up report from that local TV station
Speaker 1: talked about the helicopter pile. I think I played it
Speaker 1: on Wednesday or Thursday last week, and he just voluntarily
Speaker 1: took his two man helicopter and he wanted to help people,
Speaker 1: and so he found a couple that was there and
Speaker 1: they were stranded, and so he left his son behind
Speaker 1: and took the lady they'd been there. Now this news
Speaker 1: report has gone back and talked to the people who survived,
Speaker 1: and they said all we had was two bottles of
Speaker 1: water and a bag of chips, which made him thirsty,
Speaker 1: and that's what they've been living off of for a
Speaker 1: couple of days. Because you know, people like FEMA and
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson not in any hurry to do anything about
Speaker 1: this stuff. But this private guy goes out there and
Speaker 1: he leaves his sun behind, takes the woman back. And
Speaker 1: then there's some volunteers who have come from Michigan, and
Speaker 1: I forget their National Guard or fire fireman or emergency
Speaker 1: team or something like that, but they're like, great, we'll
Speaker 1: take care of And then this local deputy fire chief,
Speaker 1: who they've now shown the guy's picture in his name.
Speaker 1: How pathetic this guy is, he comes up. You got
Speaker 1: to get out of here. You don't have my permission
Speaker 1: to be here. I need your permission to be Where
Speaker 1: is that written?
Speaker 7: Now?
Speaker 1: Where's that the law? The little petty dictator Barney five?
Speaker 1: So you get out of here, you come back here.
Speaker 1: If you don't leave now, I'm going to have you arrested.
Speaker 1: And these other guys with the Michigan Rescue Team said
Speaker 1: we'll protect you, you know, just go get those people.
Speaker 1: Well he was afraid, he said. Nevertheless, he said, I'm
Speaker 1: going to go back and get my son. He wasn't
Speaker 1: gonna leave his son. So I went back and got
Speaker 1: his son. But he left, the elderly guy, and he
Speaker 1: said he was really upset. And I went back and
Speaker 1: they talked to the family, to the man and the wife,
Speaker 1: and the man said, I'm sitting there. First of all,
Speaker 1: they left me behind, But is the thing that I
Speaker 1: was really worried about was my wife. He goes, this guy,
Speaker 1: helicopter's in. He takes my wife, and then he comes
Speaker 1: back and he leaves me. He goes, I'm thinking, where'd
Speaker 1: they take her? Is he going to do something with her?
Speaker 1: He said he was scared to death that this was
Speaker 1: some kind of a scam, really concerned him. It was
Speaker 1: the fire chief that was it. And the guy who
Speaker 1: did the helicopter thing said, I really regret that didn't
Speaker 1: just defy him and keep rescuing people until I was arrested.
Speaker 1: And this fireman calls in a calls into the federal
Speaker 1: government and gets the federal government to put a no
Speaker 1: fly zone over the area. I imagine he called in
Speaker 1: Booty ge Vitty Gay is saying, don't even put drones up. Now,
Speaker 1: he's claiming after Elon Musk called him, Booty Gay's claiming, oh, well, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not obstructing anything. I played the clip for you
Speaker 1: last week where he's saying, we're gonna shut down drone flights.
Speaker 1: They can get in the way. You know, we're the
Speaker 1: ones who are important. You know, the federal government is here,
Speaker 1: get out of our way, except to not doing anything anyway.
Speaker 1: He eventually so he's very worried about his wife, so
Speaker 1: he heads back and meanwhile these guys from Michigan are
Speaker 1: concerned about him. They start heading up that way and
Speaker 1: they meet, but he's across this raging river and I
Speaker 1: should have brought the clip in to show that river.
Speaker 1: It's just amazing. This thing is like a torrent. I
Speaker 1: mean it's it's like the lower and it's got a
Speaker 1: lot of debris and stuff in it as well, really heavy,
Speaker 1: fast moving water at that time still and very much
Speaker 1: like told that story in Niagara Falls by the guy
Speaker 1: who put the rope out back and forth for an
Speaker 1: exhibition that was the lower part of Niagara, whether it
Speaker 1: was just raging river which are drowned most people, right,
Speaker 1: And so he's doing a typewrope walk over that and
Speaker 1: he says, maybe he pushes a wheelbear across it. And
Speaker 1: then he put something in a wheelbear and he pushes
Speaker 1: it across it. And he goes, how many of you
Speaker 1: believe I could do that with a person? Hey, we
Speaker 1: all believe it. And he says, okay, who wants to volunteer? Nobody?
Speaker 1: And I tell that story many times because it's the
Speaker 1: difference between you know, we talk about faith in Christ
Speaker 1: and belief. What is it? It's really trust, it's really trust.
Speaker 1: Yeah you can yeah, sure, yeah, I can believe that
Speaker 1: Jesus is who he said he is. But can I
Speaker 1: trust him? Or do I need to do something about this?
Speaker 1: Do I need to be in control of my life?
Speaker 1: Do I need to create a list of things that
Speaker 1: I've got to do and check those lists off so
Speaker 1: I can turn in my homework when I meet him. No,
Speaker 1: you get in the wheelbar. You trust him. But that
Speaker 1: was a very dangerous area downstream from Niagara Falls, and
Speaker 1: that's what this looked like, and it had logs and
Speaker 1: everything flying down really fast. Well they did is they
Speaker 1: got a rope across to him and they pulled him
Speaker 1: across so he wouldn't drown. A harrowing experience. And that
Speaker 1: was all necessary because of this power tripping little deputy
Speaker 1: fire chief. And that's why I said local government is
Speaker 1: really really important. And so the news then got a
Speaker 1: city manager who looked like she was all of twenty
Speaker 1: three on the news and she was absolutely unapologetic. Now
Speaker 1: we have our policies and they have to be followed.
Speaker 1: You got to get people like that out of your
Speaker 1: local life. Get them out of office. That's what you
Speaker 1: should be focused on. They're dangerous, They're really dangerous at
Speaker 1: the local level. All government is local, folks. All tyranny
Speaker 1: can be local as well. They can make things much
Speaker 1: worse or they can make them better. You need to
Speaker 1: be more focused on getting people like that unelected city
Speaker 1: manager and that unelected fire chief out of office by
Speaker 1: voting for somebody who is accountable and say, get these
Speaker 1: people out. Want to know that's going to be your
Speaker 1: campaign promise, or you're going to I'm going to vote
Speaker 1: for somebody else. You you go back and you look at
Speaker 1: parks and rec You know that clip that I played
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago when we were talking about
Speaker 1: Florine and sitcom. She says she works for the city,
Speaker 1: she's got a job there. She says, now we're gonna
Speaker 1: put floride in the water, and all these people start
Speaker 1: criticizing her. She said, I just realized I can do
Speaker 1: anything I want and they can't do anything about it. Well,
Speaker 1: that's the way it is with that city manager. That's
Speaker 1: the way it is with that deputy fire chief. So that
Speaker 1: story has a happy ending in the sense that the
Speaker 1: people got back and they were very grateful to the
Speaker 1: pilot for doing it. They said they understood she saw
Speaker 1: what was happening, the intimidation and everything. But again, it
Speaker 1: nearly cost that guy his life. And the you know,
Speaker 1: the people from Michigan showed up because they wanted to
Speaker 1: help people. That local deputy fire chief just wants to
Speaker 1: boss people around. He didn't want to help anybody, just
Speaker 1: like Lindsey Graham, just like Lawla. The Biden Harris administration
Speaker 1: threw over forty billion dollars for Internet build out. Three
Speaker 1: years later, not a single project is underway. This is
Speaker 1: like the what was it seven a half billion dollars
Speaker 1: they did for charging stations and they built seven of them.
Speaker 1: This is even worse. They're going to build out the
Speaker 1: internet forty billion dollars. Not a single project is underway
Speaker 1: three years later. Where'd all that money go? I think
Speaker 1: you know, don't you. They're also, while this is happening,
Speaker 1: while they didn't spend any of the forty billion dollars
Speaker 1: for internet build out in rural areas, now that the
Speaker 1: people who had internet cell phone coverage don't have it,
Speaker 1: they're obstructing Elon Musk's and his starlink of people from
Speaker 1: putting wireless internet out there. They're marked over forty two
Speaker 1: billion dollars to provide internet access to unserved, mostly rural areas.
Speaker 1: Maybe you could use some of that money to help
Speaker 1: some of the people. Who knows. They compared it to
Speaker 1: what FDR did with electricity, except that, you know, even
Speaker 1: though he pushed central planning in central government and pushed
Speaker 1: it away way beyond what the constitution allows. That's an understatement,
Speaker 1: but he did something with it, unlike these people. So
Speaker 1: they said, due to a slew of regulatory hurdles, they've
Speaker 1: done nothing. Regulatory hurdles include things like green initiatives. Before
Speaker 1: you can get any of that money, you've got to
Speaker 1: employ unionized workforces. You get to do DEI. Okay, So
Speaker 1: unless you do green DEI union, you're not going to
Speaker 1: get the money. So they're not getting the money. And
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one LA LA became the broadbands. Are years
Speaker 1: and forty two billion dollars later, not a single person
Speaker 1: has been connected to the Internet under the bad program
Speaker 1: that stands for Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment. You know
Speaker 1: when they put the term equity in there, that's a scam.
Speaker 1: By the way, while we're talking about money, Walt's donors
Speaker 1: were handed fifteen billion dollars in state payments. I've said
Speaker 1: many times there's no better return on investment than a
Speaker 1: corrupt politician, and Tim Waltz is won. This knucklehead collected
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety thousand dollars from from companies they said,
Speaker 1: donations from employees four hundred and thirty four state vendors
Speaker 1: between twenty nineteen and twenty twenty two. So over a
Speaker 1: period of three years, he gets from state vendors who
Speaker 1: want the business right, the state vendors give them eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety thousand dollars and then not quite a
Speaker 1: million dollars, and they get more than fifteen thousand times
Speaker 1: the amount of money that they gave him back. Think
Speaker 1: about that. You know, they didn't make a million. If
Speaker 1: it had been a million dollars that they've given to him,
Speaker 1: it would have been fifteen thousand times. But that's a
Speaker 1: pretty good return on investment, isn't it. And so four
Speaker 1: hundre and thirty four state vendors gave him eight hundred
Speaker 1: ninety thousand dollars, and then those same companies collected nearly
Speaker 1: fifteen billion dollars in payments. And this is where when
Speaker 1: they got talked about FEMA and how they're blocking things.
Speaker 1: This is where the kind of stuff like preferred vendors
Speaker 1: comes in. Okay, so let's talk about all the celebrities
Speaker 1: donating money. I can do that on one hand. I
Speaker 1: can do it with one finger, which finger should we
Speaker 1: use for the celebrities in Hollywood. I put it up
Speaker 1: for a vote here, Dolly Parton says, I'm donating a
Speaker 1: million dollars to Hurricane Helene relief efforts. She's the only one.
Speaker 1: She's the only one. She said. The million dollars that
Speaker 1: she was donating was going to come from her own
Speaker 1: bank account, but that her Dollywood companies that are all
Speaker 1: over the area here Pirates, Voyage, Dinner and Show, Dolly Parton, Stampede,
Speaker 1: Dollywood Foundation, that another million dollars would come from her companies,
Speaker 1: but a million dollars personally. You see any of these
Speaker 1: these Democrat celebrities, and where's Alec Baldwin, Where's Michael Moore?
Speaker 1: You know where all these these people in Hollywood. Of course,
Speaker 1: it's absurd to think that they would even give a penny,
Speaker 1: she said. Remember when we had the fires here, she said,
Speaker 1: everybody pitched in and tried to do everything they could.
Speaker 1: And so I really think that this is the time
Speaker 1: for me to step up again, for all of us
Speaker 1: to step up and to do what we can. Well,
Speaker 1: if you want to know if the federal government is
Speaker 1: going to step up.
Speaker 7: FEMA is tremendously prepared. This is what we do, this
Speaker 7: is what they do. And the key here, Rebecca, is
Speaker 7: also to make sure that the communities who are potentially
Speaker 7: impacted are prepared as well. And it's not just hurricanes
Speaker 7: and wildfires, also extreme heat, which certainly is something.
Speaker 1: He's going to make it about. Climate change are already experiencing.
Speaker 3: As Secretary Alejandro myorc is sounding the alarm on FEMA
Speaker 3: funding right after the devastation.
Speaker 1: Now he's pushing the climate change agenda. It's always about
Speaker 1: the green grift, isn't it. And so this guy who's
Speaker 1: not doing anything to protect the borders, not doing anything
Speaker 1: to help anybody. Here's a picture somebody took of him.
Speaker 1: This is from Joe Gabriel Simon's and on Twitter he said,
Speaker 1: for context about all this femas stuff, I just saw
Speaker 1: Alejandro Majorcis this afternoon at sid Mashburn. I mean this
Speaker 1: place is so expensive I've not I've ever been heard
Speaker 1: of it, he said, which is the second time I've
Speaker 1: seen him there on a Saturday afternoon in about a month.
Speaker 1: So suffice to say, the guy is not working around
Speaker 1: the clock. You see, when the going gets tough, the
Speaker 1: tough go shopping a little bit of retail therapy there
Speaker 1: for Mayorkas, who seems to have plenty of funding for shopping,
Speaker 1: just not for helping. So the back and forth with
Speaker 1: Elon Musk and buddy buddy gig, booty gay. That's why
Speaker 1: I actually call him the buddy gig. He's got a buddy gig,
Speaker 1: doesn't he. He's got a cushy job, doesn't he. I've
Speaker 1: called him booty marks, called him booty gay because being
Speaker 1: gay was his calling card. That's why you should vote
Speaker 1: for him. You know, you should have voted for La
Speaker 1: La and should vote for her again now because he's
Speaker 1: black or something kind of I guess, I don't know. Whatever,
Speaker 1: whatever she is, you should vote for her. Female and
Speaker 1: has some you know, brown mellman, so you should definitely
Speaker 1: vote for her. Booty gay. You should vote for him
Speaker 1: because he's gay. But what you need to understand is
Speaker 1: that he's a Marxist, so I called him booty Marx.
Speaker 1: But he's also a part of the crony group, so
Speaker 1: I guess we could call him a buddy gig. He's
Speaker 1: got a buddy gig. There at the Department Transportation, Musk
Speaker 1: accused FEMA failing to adequately help people in trouble in
Speaker 1: actively blocking citizens who try to help. So Booty Gig says,
Speaker 1: give me a call, and so he did. It hasn't
Speaker 1: come out exactly what he said, but he's claiming that
Speaker 1: not a problem at all. Booty Gay denied the allegations.
Speaker 1: He said, no one is shutting down the airspace and
Speaker 1: the FA doesn't block legitimate rescue and recovery flights. I
Speaker 1: played you the clip he doesn't even want drones going
Speaker 1: up helped identify people. And as a follow up to
Speaker 1: that situation with the couple and the deputy fire chief
Speaker 1: and the helicopter pilot, they had the helicopter pilot back
Speaker 1: in there in a day or so. And the reason
Speaker 1: for it is because the military with their big helicopters
Speaker 1: can't get into the places where these small helicopters can,
Speaker 1: and the small helicopters can't cover as much a space
Speaker 1: as they can with these drones. But they don't care
Speaker 1: about helping people. They really don't remember. In the clips
Speaker 1: that I played last week, we also had someone who
Speaker 1: was talking about using the helicopters and said we lost
Speaker 1: an entire day because Biden was going to be doing
Speaker 1: a flyby, and so they shut down all the airspace
Speaker 1: because the Emperor with no clothes is coming through right
Speaker 1: and so after the flyby, it's very interesting to see
Speaker 1: what happened. You had a reporter who came up after
Speaker 1: Biden did his flyover to look at the damage. I
Speaker 1: don't know what he was doing when he was up
Speaker 1: in the helicopter, but he doesn't seem to even know
Speaker 1: why he was flying in the helicopter.
Speaker 7: What does the states the storm zone need, mister President,
Speaker 7: What are the states in the storm zone?
Speaker 1: What do they need?
Speaker 7: After what you saw today?
Speaker 4: I on the storm zone, get there, I'm learning what
Speaker 4: storm is solving of. They getting everything that they need.
Speaker 1: They're very happy, thof the board. Yeah, they're getting everything.
Speaker 1: What storm? What storm? You know, the one that you
Speaker 1: shut down all the rescue efforts for so you could
Speaker 1: fly over and look at the damage and pretend that
Speaker 1: you cared this arm that you don't care at all about.
Speaker 1: You don't even know the name of it. You don't
Speaker 1: even know why you were there. He said, Oh, they're
Speaker 1: getting all the money they need and they're very happy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're all just all the happy slaves waving their hands
Speaker 1: in the rubble. That's President Biden. We're so excited to
Speaker 1: see him come by and fly over us. Isn't that great?
Speaker 1: I feel so much better now. Meanwhile, La Las says
Speaker 1: to everybody she's still confident in Biden's mental ability to
Speaker 1: serve as president. Really so last week Biden said he
Speaker 1: was talking with Israelis about possible strikes on Ranian oil
Speaker 1: facilities last week, and then he caused oil prices to skyrocket.
Speaker 1: But you know, he's right on top of everything. You're
Speaker 1: gonna scare everybody to death with that, But of course
Speaker 1: that's a real possibility. That's what he's focused on. The
Speaker 1: President again left the White House for the weekend to
Speaker 1: rest at Camp David, and he thought it might be
Speaker 1: bad optics for him to go sit on the beach
Speaker 1: at his property there in Delaware, by the way, not
Speaker 1: only you know, always be bad optics for him to
Speaker 1: do that kind of stuff, because his beach house, like
Speaker 1: Obama's beach house, like all these people who are pushing
Speaker 1: climate change, their houses are supposed to be underwater by now,
Speaker 1: why didn't that happen? And why are they spending so
Speaker 1: many tens of millions of dollars to get these properties
Speaker 1: on exclusive beachfront areas when they think that it's all
Speaker 1: going to be underwater. Meanwhile, FEMA has denied confiscating hurricane
Speaker 1: relief supplies, contradicting claims by SpaceX engineers and by the
Speaker 1: people who are on the ground. You know, don't believe
Speaker 1: your lying eyes. Just listen to the government that always
Speaker 1: tells you the truth, that says that neither FEMA nor
Speaker 1: a state level Tennessee Emergency Management agency has confiscate supplies
Speaker 1: in Tennessee. TEMA dismissed the rumors and opposed to social media,
Speaker 1: saying TEA and FEMA personnel are not confiscating supplies. Any
Speaker 1: report to the contra it is false, you know. So
Speaker 1: they don't say they're not obstructing people bringing supplies in either. Well,
Speaker 1: there's been a lot of contrary reports about that, so
Speaker 1: you can decide who you trust. We do have people
Speaker 1: like Robbie Starbuck who's been working to put in starlink units,
Speaker 1: and he says, I've confirmed this at multiple levels of
Speaker 1: government in Tennessee. But has he been there? Has he
Speaker 1: been there? The government is going to tell you that
Speaker 1: they're not stealing people's stuff. I'll believe it when the
Speaker 1: people on the ground are not saying that the government
Speaker 1: is stealing people's stuff, but FEMA is. Chris Well, this
Speaker 1: woman who's in charge of it, dismisses as ridiculous the
Speaker 1: idea that they would obstruct and confiscate stuff, except we've
Speaker 1: seen this throughout their history. You know, it's really a
Speaker 1: shame that we're putting politics ahead of helping people, and
Speaker 1: that's what we're here to do. She said, that's exactly right.
Speaker 1: That's what her mission at FEMA is. Her mission at
Speaker 1: FEMA is to put politics ahead of helping people. She said.
Speaker 1: It's had a tremendous impact on the comfort level of
Speaker 1: FEMA employees. I guess it just kind of takes all
Speaker 1: the joy out of collecting an eighty one hundred dollars
Speaker 1: a month paycheck while you stay on standby in the
Speaker 1: hotel room and watch movies. To say, well, I don't know,
Speaker 1: this might be the last time we're able to do this. Nah,
Speaker 1: it won't be. Mike Johnson and the Republicans will never
Speaker 1: cut your funding. Oh, they're just fine with that. Whatever
Speaker 1: the Democrats put in, the Republicans make it permanent. That's
Speaker 1: their mission. That's controlled opposition. She says, it's demoralizing to
Speaker 1: all the first responders that have been out there in
Speaker 1: the community, is helping people. Now what's demoralizing is for
Speaker 1: people to want to be able to help and for
Speaker 1: your department to get in the way and shut that down.
Speaker 1: Where does she come from, by the way, Well, like
Speaker 1: I said, it started in nineteen seventy eight, she's the
Speaker 1: first woman to lead FEMA. Her background or educational background.
Speaker 1: She has a BS in technology education and a master's
Speaker 1: of Public administration and a master's degree in homeland security. Wow,
Speaker 1: and she offered. She managed the Office of Emergency Management
Speaker 1: for the City of Aurora, Colorado. Okay, Aurora, Colorado. That
Speaker 1: just seems to keep coming up, doesn't it. The phony
Speaker 1: shooting the CIA there in Denver, in that particular area Aurora, Colorado,
Speaker 1: That right there is a bit suspicious. Eventually, she got
Speaker 1: moved to New York City Emergency Management Department in twenty
Speaker 1: and nineteen and she was a commissioner of that. So
Speaker 1: they've got their own little cities have got their own emergence,
Speaker 1: see I think. So she went from the city to
Speaker 1: running this and doing a really poor job of it. Well,
Speaker 1: I'll get some comments here before we take a break.
Speaker 1: Don't frag me, bro. They're daring us to rise up
Speaker 1: and again if we're not going to rise up and
Speaker 1: do something about it at the local level. And this
Speaker 1: is an opportunity for us to understand that, and it's
Speaker 1: an opportunity for people to start organizing. It's time to
Speaker 1: wake up and see this. We had it in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: Now we got it again four years later. When you're
Speaker 1: going to realize that the solution is not in Washington,
Speaker 1: and we're going to have plenty of problems if we
Speaker 1: don't pay attention to local government. We're going to have
Speaker 1: a lot of problems with local government too. But all
Speaker 1: politics is local, and if you're going to have any
Speaker 1: effect at all on politics, it will be at the
Speaker 1: local level. You're going to have an impact on government
Speaker 1: at the local level, or you will have no packed
Speaker 1: at all. Folks, take a look at all the times
Speaker 1: that you've voted. Has it made any difference in Washington
Speaker 1: with all these different presidents and all your Republicans in
Speaker 1: the Senate, It hasn't made any difference whatsoever. None. And
Speaker 1: we're getting a lot of bad people in local government
Speaker 1: as well, and then we really are done anyway. Don't
Speaker 1: frag me. Bro says they're doing their best to stir
Speaker 1: up crazies and to use that as a pretext to
Speaker 1: send hammers after the rest of us. That's right. We
Speaker 1: need to we need to make sure that you know
Speaker 1: before you pick up arms, let's try nullification. If you're
Speaker 1: not going to stand up and speak out against these people,
Speaker 1: you're not going to stand up and organize nullification. If
Speaker 1: you're not going to get involved in local politics, what
Speaker 1: makes you think that you're going to be able to
Speaker 1: fight a civil war and win this stuff either. Tomicdog
Speaker 1: help David Night expose mema failures by liking the video
Speaker 1: sharing and social media and subscribing. Thank you, yes, and
Speaker 1: thank you for your mind to I appreciate that. Please
Speaker 1: help us to reach an audience. It is really key.
Speaker 1: I mean it is and I've talked about this in
Speaker 1: the past. It's been very difficult for us. It's not
Speaker 1: just the places where I've been completely shut off. Spotify, PayPal, Venmo, YouTube,
Speaker 1: all the large venues are shut down to us, and
Speaker 1: so we're in these corners. And then even when we
Speaker 1: get in the corners with the podcasts, they shut down
Speaker 1: our podcasts early December and it was down for the weekend.
Speaker 1: I got it back up, but they didn't send it
Speaker 1: back out. That's the type of thing. It's like shadow banning.
Speaker 1: It's the type of thing that Alex did to try
Speaker 1: to make my show disappear when he kept the The
Speaker 1: reason we got two different podcast names is because he
Speaker 1: kept that podcast. The links to my bit shoot channels
Speaker 1: and other things like that. He kept that kept it
Speaker 1: for a few months so people wouldn't realize that the
Speaker 1: show is continuing. And that's what the podcast companies are doing.
Speaker 1: It's like a shadow van. And so if you don't
Speaker 1: like the broadcast, you're watching it, if you're watching it
Speaker 1: live or and repeat, please do that and please pass
Speaker 1: on long, Please leave positive comments, appreciate that audi modern
Speaker 1: retro radio. Good to see you, He says. FEMA is
Speaker 1: ordering local police to do horrible things to people who
Speaker 1: have lost everything. We don't need government, folks, That's right
Speaker 1: what I see happening here. You know, when you look
Speaker 1: at the attitude from this local company with a deputy
Speaker 1: fire chief and all this kind of stuff, well they're
Speaker 1: saying is we've got our stuff here. That means that
Speaker 1: we got to shut down everything that's not us. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: if they were doing something that'd be one aspect, there
Speaker 1: still would not be any reason to shut down volunteer help. Well,
Speaker 1: you're just going to get in my way and everything.
Speaker 1: This type of training is coming out of the federal
Speaker 1: government and the same way if you go back about
Speaker 1: a decade, you remember one of the first bad cases
Speaker 1: of shooting that we saw on bodycam footage was a
Speaker 1: homeless guy outside of Phoenix, Arizona. He was up in
Speaker 1: the hills and it was very long encounter with these
Speaker 1: cops and they're all standing on the steep hill and everything.
Speaker 1: They wanted him to leave. He didn't want to. He
Speaker 1: was camping out there. He wasn't bothering anybody. But they
Speaker 1: took it upon themselves to confront him. They eventually shot
Speaker 1: him and then stuck their dogs on him, and it
Speaker 1: was outrageous. He was no threat to them at all.
Speaker 1: And the body cameras showed all of that. And shortly
Speaker 1: after that, a guy who had been an instructor at
Speaker 1: the Arizona State Police Academy said they're teaching this shoot
Speaker 1: first curriculum. He says, we've never done that before. That's
Speaker 1: coming from Washington, it's coming from the Obama administration. And
Speaker 1: he said, I'm not going to be a part of that.
Speaker 1: I'm resigning. See these ways of the police shooting first
Speaker 1: and FEMA coming in and telling all the emergency or
Speaker 1: sowners they're the ones who are training the people. They're
Speaker 1: giving them money, they're giving them training, and they're telling
Speaker 1: them to act like FEMA has acted since nineteen seventy eight.
Speaker 1: The federal government is a cancer that is metastasized now
Speaker 1: to a lot of local governments as well. Sam Miller
Speaker 1: won two to three. The supplies that FEMA was confiscating
Speaker 1: from the volunteers are being tracked to go back to
Speaker 1: the illegals. Unbelievable, but of course I believe it. Yeah, again,
Speaker 1: I believe the people on the ground. I don't believe
Speaker 1: the mainstream media, and certainly don't believe ma Yorkis who
Speaker 1: says he's doing this ap rumble seat. And you know,
Speaker 1: Graham likely gets a kickback from the money laundering operation
Speaker 1: of this warmonger, genocidal construct. To take that little SOB down.
Speaker 1: I wish the people of South Carolina would But again,
Speaker 1: it's another example and I've had people in South Carolina
Speaker 1: tell me, look, we really can't stand him. Publican voters
Speaker 1: can't stand him, but the Republican establishment and the globalist
Speaker 1: establishment keeps putting this guy back in office federal elections.
Speaker 1: Folks don't mean anything, and if it is meaningful, they
Speaker 1: will control it. Lindsey Graham good example of that. Brian
Speaker 1: and Dev McCartney. I call FEMA and they swear any
Speaker 1: impeding of AID is by the local and state authorities.
Speaker 1: They're denying the crime as usual. And as I said,
Speaker 1: I think that it is also being done by state
Speaker 1: and local officials who have been trained by the federal government.
Speaker 1: The federal government trains them, just like the federal government
Speaker 1: trains the police. It is a cancer that is out
Speaker 1: there in the same way that the Department of Education
Speaker 1: another Jimmy Carter creation that's the curriculum, and has this
Speaker 1: curriculum being pushed out, you know, for the pedophile curriculum
Speaker 1: to the kids and everything. All of this filth, bauchery,
Speaker 1: this tyranny is all coming out of Washington. It's all
Speaker 1: being pushed out through public health, through public education, through
Speaker 1: the emergency responders and anything. They corrupt everything using money,
Speaker 1: Michelle Obaman, organize your neighbors prior to the election. The
Speaker 1: evening of the election will be too late. Yeah. And
Speaker 1: by the way, I'll just mention again the two volumes
Speaker 1: Civil Defensemanual dot Com Jack Lawson. He's got some great
Speaker 1: tips because he's done it himself on just you know,
Speaker 1: how to approach neighbors in a way that's going to
Speaker 1: work psychological issues, not just Okay, here's some of the
Speaker 1: things that you need to do, but first you got
Speaker 1: to get the people together and to do it in
Speaker 1: a way that is going to be low key. And
Speaker 1: to tell you about the you know, the types of
Speaker 1: issues that he's run into when he's done that as well.
Speaker 1: Civil Defensemanual dot Com give you information about water. That's
Speaker 1: a free chapter he has on the website. You should
Speaker 1: read that. About food preparation, about self defense, about community defense,
Speaker 1: all those things. You'll find that they're we're getting into
Speaker 1: some dangerous times the next couple of years. Psalm one
Speaker 1: for four. Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. Hey, David,
Speaker 1: want to pitch in a little saw elon speaking at
Speaker 1: the Trump rally about how important our constitutional rights are.
Speaker 1: All I could do was roll my eyes praying for
Speaker 1: all of you. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: M Sellers. I traveled to Alabama this weekend and back
Speaker 1: saw literally hundreds of utility truck convoys, horse trailers, trucks, trailers,
Speaker 1: four wheelers, UTVs, campers, rbs. Interstate traffic was crazy, and
Speaker 1: I saw no government vehicles. That's right, Yeah, that's the
Speaker 1: spirit of helping people is not dead in this country.
Speaker 1: It's just being smothered by our government. Self, patriot, thank
Speaker 1: you very much for the tip, says. I heard something
Speaker 1: over the weekend about the locals beating up FEMA representative
Speaker 1: bad enough that he was hospitalized. I'm not saying I'm
Speaker 1: condoning violence, but I'm condoning wise. Well again, you know,
Speaker 1: I saw a little bit of that. I didn't realize
Speaker 1: they got physical with him. I thought they were just
Speaker 1: yelling at screaming, but maybe they did. My take when
Speaker 1: I saw that headline about the opposition to it, my
Speaker 1: take on it was okay, Well, if everybody is all
Speaker 1: the slaves are well fed and happy, as Biden said
Speaker 1: when he flew over the area, if the if FEMA
Speaker 1: is not in the way, if FEMA is not absent
Speaker 1: not restructing, Why would the people be so angry? Right?
Speaker 1: Doesn't that say a lot? And these are people who
Speaker 1: don't normally lose everything. But maybe that speaks louder than
Speaker 1: their propaganda. Jeb Stewart, the military helicopter can get into
Speaker 1: those areas, that's bs. He says, black Hawks and qwa's
Speaker 1: are easily can easily get into those areas. If they
Speaker 1: can rescue down pilots and triple canopy jungle, they can
Speaker 1: get into North Carolina. Well, I agree, that was a
Speaker 1: line that I was told that. That's what they said,
Speaker 1: and I guess they probably said that because they're not
Speaker 1: sending the helicopters. They said, yeah, you know, we just
Speaker 1: let these guys. We'll let them do it because we've
Speaker 1: got some bad publicity. But you know, we really can't
Speaker 1: get into those small areas there. So I agree, I agree.
Speaker 1: I think everything the government tells us is a lie.
Speaker 1: Quite frankly, we're gonna take a quick break and we'll
Speaker 1: be right back.
Speaker 2: You were listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, I'll talk a little bit about Milania Trump's book,
Speaker 1: and we got much to say about that. Things that
Speaker 1: she has said in it. But here's something that just
Speaker 1: came out, and actually the book hasn't been released yet,
Speaker 1: but there are excerpts that have been released and covered
Speaker 1: by some of these media organizations. She talks about Baron's autism,
Speaker 1: and she says that bullying caused him irreparable damage. And
Speaker 1: so this is something that has been rumor for quite
Speaker 1: some time. It was Rosie O'Donnell that speculated that Baron
Speaker 1: might have high functioning autism back in twenty sixteen. She
Speaker 1: then defended questioning whether he had autism by saying that
Speaker 1: she recognized the signs due to her own daughter having
Speaker 1: the condition. Isn't it interesting that it is so common
Speaker 1: nobody really cares to talk about that though. It's one
Speaker 1: of these things like my carditis and peracarditis. As it
Speaker 1: becomes very very common, nobody wants to talk about the cause.
Speaker 1: But we know what the cause is. And as this
Speaker 1: is being talked about by Rosie O'Donnell, Alex Jones said
Speaker 1: the same thing got Trump very angry with him. But
Speaker 1: Jones is saying this because he wanted to tell his
Speaker 1: audience that Trump was on our side when it came
Speaker 1: to vaccines. Oh yeah, yeah, he understands that mercury and aluminum,
Speaker 1: you know, the same stuff that Trump said none. You know,
Speaker 1: you take this Trump shot is gonna be good. Just
Speaker 1: got and aluminum. It'll be some kind of dead virus
Speaker 1: or something in there, you know. But it's just like
Speaker 1: sugar water. He should take that. Do it for Trump.
Speaker 1: You know, that's not the bad Gates vaccine. No, this
Speaker 1: is the good Trump vaccine. Well, he was lying to
Speaker 1: people about Trump as well, trying to say that it
Speaker 1: was Trump knew about autism because he had a sign
Speaker 1: who had been damaged by autism, and you know, and look,
Speaker 1: you know he had rf K Jr. And a Trump
Speaker 1: tower and everything. But during the election, way before RFK
Speaker 1: Junior came in, alex Is saying, yeah, Trump's anti vaccine.
Speaker 1: Yeah you noticed that I somehow missed his anti vaccine stuff.
Speaker 1: You know, when he said to get the shot.
Speaker 7: Mann's just so important.
Speaker 1: This is really going around now.
Speaker 6: They have to guess there.
Speaker 1: Maybe he's stupid enough that he actually believed that and
Speaker 1: gave it to his son. Who knows, he should have known.
Speaker 1: By the time Baron came around, it was not really
Speaker 1: a hidden thing anymore. I mean a lot of us
Speaker 1: didn't know, and I didn't know, and Travis is injured
Speaker 1: by it, not with autism, but still he just used
Speaker 1: it to get money, just like Alex used that tale
Speaker 1: to get money. Milani're right, so that bullying her son
Speaker 1: made it impossible for Trump's to accept O'Donnell's apology. Baron's
Speaker 1: experience of being bullied both online and in real life
Speaker 1: followed the following the incident as a clear indication of
Speaker 1: the irrepable damage it caused. No apology can undo the
Speaker 1: harm inflicted on him. Well, you might think that maybe
Speaker 1: the bullying thing is not as important as autism. Right
Speaker 1: at the bottom line is that we've all been bullied
Speaker 1: in school. Come on, let's get real about this stuff.
Speaker 1: This isn't anything new, but this is part of her
Speaker 1: LGBT creds. Right, Let's talk about bullying, because that's the
Speaker 1: way we're going to push LGBT stuff on you, the
Speaker 1: way we're going to bully you with pronouns, that's the
Speaker 1: way we're going to groom your kids because of bullying.
Speaker 1: Bullying is very important for people like Milania, the hard
Speaker 1: left Epstein branch of the Republican Party. But she doesn't
Speaker 1: want to talk about what it was that gave her
Speaker 1: son autism used to be incredibly rare. So they said
Speaker 1: it inspired Malania to focus on bullying, and she has
Speaker 1: an initiative, she called it that is child centric. She said,
Speaker 1: the be best initiative. Well, I haven't looked at it,
Speaker 1: but I wouldn't be surprised if it's not already pushing LGBT.
Speaker 1: That's what it will push, because that's what the bullying
Speaker 1: narrative is all about. That's about pushing the LGBT stuff.
Speaker 1: So when we look at the vaccines, I said, there
Speaker 1: was a very good example, just like I talked about
Speaker 1: DeSantis earlier. Said all right, FEMA, you're a problem. Get
Speaker 1: out of the way. We're going to handle this with
Speaker 1: our state resources. You're not running anything here. Get out. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's the appropriate response. Now at the local level, this
Speaker 1: just came up. This was reported by Alex Newman the
Speaker 1: New American, And this just came up at the Constitutional
Speaker 1: Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. Remember a week or so ago,
Speaker 1: they had a summit in Las Vegas, and it was
Speaker 1: one of these mainstream rags like the New York Times
Speaker 1: in Washington Posts. It was, oh, look at these constitutional sheriffs.
Speaker 1: They think there's something called the Bill of Rights, and
Speaker 1: I mean it was that bad. Well at this Constitutional
Speaker 1: Sheriff and Peace Officers Association, that's Sheriff mac has that
Speaker 1: they had a pastor who got up and spoke about
Speaker 1: what the sheriff in his town had done during the lockdowns.
Speaker 1: Now this is in New Mexico. Pastor Caleb Cooper of
Speaker 1: the New Hope Revival Church in New Mexico stood up
Speaker 1: alongside Sheriff Glenn Hamilton, who had carved a path for
Speaker 1: resisting unconstitutional tyranny in defense of the church and liberty
Speaker 1: during COVID that continues to inspire, as well as in
Speaker 1: defense of the Constitution. The Constitution, that is the supreme
Speaker 1: law of the land that he swore to uphold, which
Speaker 1: is more important than any regulations of any public health bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: more important than any emergency order from Trump's alexz Ar
Speaker 1: at HHS or from Trump himself, more important than any
Speaker 1: dictates or laws. That's the Constitution. And so that was
Speaker 1: what he was doing. So he spoke of the thing,
Speaker 1: and that the pastor explained how and why he decided
Speaker 1: they simply could not shut his church and comply with
Speaker 1: the unlawful decrees of the governor, and that is his
Speaker 1: right under the First Amendment. At a time in many
Speaker 1: places of worship were deemed to be non essential by authorities.
Speaker 1: Cooper and Sheriff Hamilton and joined forces. One Sunday, the
Speaker 1: sheriff deputized every member of Cooper's congregation so they would
Speaker 1: be exempt from lockdown off it orders. You know. The
Speaker 1: governor said, Well, churches are not essential, said the pastor.
Speaker 1: So he said, stronger than the virus is fear, and
Speaker 1: we cannot bow to a spirit of fear. He said,
Speaker 1: I have a divine mandate to keep my lighthouse open,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to do it. Used to be that
Speaker 1: when there would be plagues or something like that would happen,
Speaker 1: the church would be at the center of giving aid.
Speaker 1: It'd be at the center of giving physical aid and comfort,
Speaker 1: but especially of giving mental and spiritual aid and comfort.
Speaker 1: Church is essentil not government. So he got an unsettling
Speaker 1: voicemail from the state police saying that their church was
Speaker 1: non essential. So he went to the local sheriff. It
Speaker 1: had no prior relationship with the local sheriff. He said,
Speaker 1: this crucial PARTNERSHI would underscore the essence of the community resilience.
Speaker 1: Sheriff Glenn Hamilton's response is unequivocal. He said, Pastor, I'll
Speaker 1: defend you even if I go to jail myself, a
Speaker 1: testament to the defense of God given rights that he
Speaker 1: swore to hold over yielding to perceived governmental overreach. You
Speaker 1: see the Lesser Magistrate, as Matt Trouhala has eloquently talked about,
Speaker 1: a very small book. It's very dense with information, but
Speaker 1: it's an easy read. But he packs all that information
Speaker 1: in there. He gives examples throughout Christian history, but even
Speaker 1: throughout Pagan history of the idea of the Lesser Magistrate,
Speaker 1: the idea of laws and principles that transcend the dictates
Speaker 1: of some want to be dictators, and that really the path, folks.
Speaker 1: We need to have governors who are going to stand
Speaker 1: up and tell Fema get out of here. You're in
Speaker 1: the way. We need to have pastors who are going
Speaker 1: to say, no, there's a First Amendment and you're violating it.
Speaker 1: And I'm going to stand with the Constitution, not with you,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to stand with the people of this community.
Speaker 1: So the Sheriff's Presidence and the church. He was donned
Speaker 1: in full regalia. They said, he came in, he deputized
Speaker 1: everybody in the church that includes a baptistery. Is that
Speaker 1: part of it. There's a powerful message of unity and
Speaker 1: lawful support. Said, we're not shutting this church down. Pastor
Speaker 1: Cooper highlighted the importance of this pivotal moment, underscoring the
Speaker 1: sheriff's role as quote, that barrier between a tyrannical government
Speaker 1: that seeks to oppress and your God given rights. He
Speaker 1: has legitimate authority. Even though the Washingt Post or whoever
Speaker 1: it was that had that, they were freaking out and said,
Speaker 1: you know that these people are teaching that they can
Speaker 1: stand with the Constitution against other branches of government.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: It's called checks and balances is what it was designed for.
Speaker 1: It was a good design. We had to go back
Speaker 1: to it. Cooper's rationale was clear. He said, the only
Speaker 1: thing worse than somebody dying of COVID nineteen is that
Speaker 1: they die of COVID nineteen without Jesus Christ as their
Speaker 1: Lord and savior. Pastor Cooper's courageous journey, encapsulaid in parts
Speaker 1: by the film Non Compliant serves as an inspiring called
Speaker 1: action the Gospel offers the ultimate salvation and defending its
Speaker 1: proclamation as paramount to preserving both faith and freedom. That
Speaker 1: is why the founders of this country put it in
Speaker 1: the very first Amendment, a very first part of the
Speaker 1: first Amendment. So as we look at other medical tyranny here,
Speaker 1: I've talked about water fluoridation and how we had that
Speaker 1: court case in California, federal court case in California, where
Speaker 1: the judge said, this is not safe, this is an
Speaker 1: unwarranted risk. And now we see the other part of this.
Speaker 1: You know, the question about any kind of medical situation
Speaker 1: is is it safe? Is it effective? Well, they saw
Speaker 1: that it was not safe. And now you've had a
Speaker 1: large study from the Cochrane Review that has looked at
Speaker 1: the lie that has been used to sell the expensive
Speaker 1: fluoridation process to communities all over the place. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a waste of your tax money, but it is
Speaker 1: also medication through the water supply. How and again I
Speaker 1: need to write an article. I need to do that.
Speaker 1: That's something that nobody's talking about. And this is why
Speaker 1: I said for years and years I said, yeah, it's
Speaker 1: good for us to have this discussion about the harmful
Speaker 1: effects of fluoride, and they're very well documented. Harvard did it,
Speaker 1: and so you know, it's easy to document it. But
Speaker 1: then they come back and they say, well, we're not
Speaker 1: giving you that level that's harmful. Well, how do you
Speaker 1: control the dosage? If you dumped into into the water,
Speaker 1: you can control that dosage. And so now what they
Speaker 1: find out with the Cocker review is that it doesn't
Speaker 1: help with dental health either. So it's ineffective and dangerous,
Speaker 1: just like the vaccine, just like everything the medical community
Speaker 1: is doing. The review follows that California federal court that
Speaker 1: said there was an unreasonable risk of reducing IQ and
Speaker 1: children and again at what doses. The review follows less
Speaker 1: than two weeks after California federal judge rule, but waterfloordation
Speaker 1: poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children and
Speaker 1: must be regulated by the EPA. Oh well, okay, EPA
Speaker 1: is not going to be interested in that. The EPA
Speaker 1: is interested in austerity, slavery, feudalism, shutting down our power supply,
Speaker 1: taking our cars, all the rest of the stuff. It's
Speaker 1: not about cleaning up the environment anymore. That was it
Speaker 1: initially that was what it was created to do, and
Speaker 1: they did it for a couple of years and then
Speaker 1: they quickly focused to this agenda of climate environmentalism. Determined
Speaker 1: if water floridation leads to reduced rates of tooth decay.
Speaker 1: Researchers from the University of Manchester, Manchester and other UK
Speaker 1: universities reviewed one hundred and fifty seven studies comparing communities
Speaker 1: that floridated their water to those that don't. About that,
Speaker 1: it's like you can look at vaccinated versus unvaccinated. You
Speaker 1: can see that all the cases of myocarditis and pericarditis.
Speaker 1: As we've had heart issues explode in the UK. They
Speaker 1: found that all the kids and teenagers, children and teenagers
Speaker 1: who had miorcarditis and paracardis, all of them had been vaccinated.
Speaker 1: None of the unvaccinated kids had myocarditis and peracarditis. And
Speaker 1: it exploded right as the vaccines were rolled out. And
Speaker 1: so they look at communities at floridate their water, compared
Speaker 1: them to those that didn't, and looked at the cavities
Speaker 1: that they had. Did they make a difference in the
Speaker 1: dental health? No, not at all. They conclude the contemporary
Speaker 1: and it shows community water fluoridation may lead to a
Speaker 1: very small reduction and cavities and children's baby teeth, baby
Speaker 1: teeth every time. It's rare, rare that that's anything. Florid
Speaker 1: and water reduce both tooth decay only by about one
Speaker 1: quarter of one tooth they found, and even that conclusion
Speaker 1: was made with low certainty. Well, of course there's other
Speaker 1: problems with floride as well. There's things like fluorosis, you know,
Speaker 1: eats up your bones if you get too much of it.
Speaker 1: And how much is too much? And how do they
Speaker 1: adjust the dosage for babies? These are kids who have
Speaker 1: baby teeth. What kind of dosage are they getting? Are
Speaker 1: they getting the same dosage as adult males? Well, yes,
Speaker 1: you're not adjusting the dosage of this like you do
Speaker 1: for aspirin or whatever it is that you give somebody.
Speaker 1: Right now, We're going to give the same dosage to
Speaker 1: a baby that we give to an adult male. How
Speaker 1: does that make any sense? Adding floride to the water
Speaker 1: supply may slightly increase the number of children who have
Speaker 1: no tooth decay in either their baby teeth or their
Speaker 1: permanent teeth. However, these results also include the possibility of
Speaker 1: little or no difference in tooth decay. So again, how
Speaker 1: are you going to control the dosage? And of course
Speaker 1: this has been done at the behest of certain industries,
Speaker 1: the aluminum industry, the nuclear industry, fertilizer industry. They all
Speaker 1: had a lot of fluoride waste that they need to
Speaker 1: get rid of, and it would have cost them a
Speaker 1: great deal of money to dispose of it themselves. So
Speaker 1: what they did was they got the communities to pay
Speaker 1: for it, and they got us to literally swallow it.
Speaker 1: We swallowed their lies, and we swallowed their fluoride for many,
Speaker 1: many years. I didn't grow up with it. That's why,
Speaker 1: you know, even before I knew about the studies and
Speaker 1: IQ tests and everything, we went to. We took the
Speaker 1: kids when they were very young, took the boys in
Speaker 1: and I forget what it was for. We didn't do
Speaker 1: wellness checks with him. We kept them away from the doctor.
Speaker 1: But we went in and this particular doctor, I still
Speaker 1: remember his name, doctor Brown, and he was, well, I'm
Speaker 1: giving you you're on well water. Okay, Well, I'm going
Speaker 1: to give you a prescription for floride pills. They need
Speaker 1: to be on fluoride, he said, No. I grew up
Speaker 1: on well water, not on fluoride. I don't need that.
Speaker 1: Well you need to have this, and it's telling us
Speaker 1: all things that we must do and everything. It's like
Speaker 1: I didn't argue with him, We just left and never
Speaker 1: came back anyway. An integrative dentist, doctor Griffin Cole told
Speaker 1: Children's Health Defense, said there was never any justification for
Speaker 1: florid eating water. It is accurate to say that we
Speaker 1: are all exposed to so many other sources of floride
Speaker 1: the containing continuing to add it to our water supply
Speaker 1: is now not necessary, but it's disingenuous and it's unconscionable
Speaker 1: to say that the statistical, the insignificant effect on tooth
Speaker 1: decay was worth poisoning millions of Americans and children's brains
Speaker 1: for nearly eighty years. And again when we go through
Speaker 1: this and we looked at my son, a whistler, who
Speaker 1: was armed with this antibiotic that is based on chloride,
Speaker 1: the fluoro chloroquins, it's poison. I don't see as I'm
Speaker 1: looking at this stuff and trying to find out how
Speaker 1: to detox fluoride and other things like that, there's absolutely
Speaker 1: your body does not need this stuff. And what it does,
Speaker 1: is it displaces very essential vitamins and minerals. It wreaks
Speaker 1: havoc on your body in so many different ways. We
Speaker 1: don't need any of it. So again in that court case,
Speaker 1: the judge said, well, the optimal level of water fluoridation
Speaker 1: currently used in the US is zero point seven milligrams
Speaker 1: per liter. How in the world do you measure that
Speaker 1: if it's dumped in the water? Number one? Number two.
Speaker 1: They dropped this number because of this case. They knew
Speaker 1: this was coming up, so they lowered the standards to
Speaker 1: make it look reasonable. Well, water flooridation was a sacred
Speaker 1: cousel of what's going to happen next. This is also
Speaker 1: an article from Children's Health Defense. They said, Rick North,
Speaker 1: a Fluoride Action Network board member, These are the people
Speaker 1: who brought the suit, at least to one of the parties.
Speaker 1: So the federal government, the medical dental establishment are the
Speaker 1: biggest promoters of water fluoridation, and their reputations are going
Speaker 1: to take a major hit. Well, I think they've just
Speaker 1: had a major hit. They're going to take yet another one. Eventually,
Speaker 1: we're going to figure out what these people are about
Speaker 1: the entire medical community, what they're about. For years even
Speaker 1: as he worked in nonprofit organizations like the American Cancers
Speaker 1: Society and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility, he didn't suspect
Speaker 1: water floridation was hazardous to human help. And I always
Speaker 1: thought floridation was fine. Yeah, because you know, and if
Speaker 1: it's so good, we need to be dumping other things
Speaker 1: into the water supply as well. Right, I wonder why
Speaker 1: they don't dump vitamin C into the water supply. What
Speaker 1: do you think that is? You think they got our
Speaker 1: best interests in heart. When he received a phone call
Speaker 1: twelve years ago from a friend who asked him to
Speaker 1: review the science on water flooridation, specifically a two thousand
Speaker 1: and six report from the National Academy of Sciences, he
Speaker 1: said what he ended up reading was unbelievable. He said,
Speaker 1: right away, I could see this quote unquote science was
Speaker 1: a direct contradiction to statements from floridation promoters. Today, he's
Speaker 1: the board member of the Florid Action Network. When several
Speaker 1: groups it sued the EPA after the agency denied a
Speaker 1: petition to end water floridation under the Toxic Substances Control Act. See,
Speaker 1: they should be the agency that stops all this. Instead
Speaker 1: they shut this down and of course, the person who
Speaker 1: was responsible for shutting down these reports was none other
Speaker 1: than the trainy in chief, Dick Divine. He goes by
Speaker 1: Rachel Levine, I think is what he calls himself. I
Speaker 1: call him Dick Divine. Nobody has to wait for the EPA.
Speaker 1: That's the bottom line. Some state mandates. Some states mandate
Speaker 1: water floridation for towns with populations of ten thousand or more,
Speaker 1: but other states it is up to the local communities.
Speaker 1: See again, state and local is how you can stop this.
Speaker 1: And you could have stopped at state and local if
Speaker 1: you could have gotten the right people in a very
Speaker 1: long time ago. North said the US is an outlier.
Speaker 1: Only twenty four other countries floridate their water out of
Speaker 1: about one hundred and eighty. The US flooridates as many
Speaker 1: people as the rest of the world put together, and
Speaker 1: at very high levels, and by dumping it in into
Speaker 1: the water where you can't control the dosage. North said
Speaker 1: commercial pressures to monetize fluoride, which he described as a
Speaker 1: hazardous waste industrial byproduct of the phosphate fertilizer industry, is
Speaker 1: one reason that floridation is heavily promoted and practiced in
Speaker 1: the US. It's all to get rid of toxic waste
Speaker 1: for people who otherwise would have to pay to eliminate. Instead,
Speaker 1: they can get you to pay them. And so I
Speaker 1: want to finish this on medical stuff by talking about homeschooling.
Speaker 1: Aaron Kirriote at Brownstone talks about how homeschooling gave medicine
Speaker 1: the blueprint of how we can fix medicine. And he
Speaker 1: doesn't say it, but I've been saying that if you
Speaker 1: understand public schools are Marxism writ large, you need to
Speaker 1: also understand that public health is Marxism writ large. We
Speaker 1: don't need anything that goes that is in the under
Speaker 1: the description of public schools or public health. They should
Speaker 1: both be eliminated for the same reasons, for the same reasons.
Speaker 1: And so here he says, so he said, I think
Speaker 1: when we look at homeschooling, that might be the way
Speaker 1: that we start to move to get our health back
Speaker 1: and healthcare back. And so he's talking about is quietly
Speaker 1: building a parallel society here in the same way their
Speaker 1: homeschooling rose that way. He said two recent posts that
Speaker 1: he put up the Managerialists Revolution in Medicine and why
Speaker 1: we are Sick? He said, our medical institutions, from hospitals
Speaker 1: and licensing boards to medical schools and professional societies are
Speaker 1: failing us. That's putting up mildly. Still. I want to
Speaker 1: suggest here a rough blueprint for way forward. I believe
Speaker 1: a better strategy involves, to the extent possible, ignoring the
Speaker 1: medical regimes, official structures, and building new ones, small scale
Speaker 1: initiatives where decentralized medical care can be restored and parents
Speaker 1: can be empowered to take responsibility for their own health.
Speaker 1: We need what the Check Dissidence of the nineteen seventies
Speaker 1: called a parallel polus for medical institutions. See, this is
Speaker 1: the approach that needs to be taken in all of
Speaker 1: these areas, and all these areas. We need to go small,
Speaker 1: we need to go decentralized, we need to go parallel.
Speaker 1: We've got to start small. We're not going to go
Speaker 1: in and take out the public schools right away. We're
Speaker 1: going to have to build a consensus. We're going to
Speaker 1: have to first of all, get people to save their
Speaker 1: own kids, and then after a while they're going to
Speaker 1: see how harmful and wasteful the public schools are. And
Speaker 1: the same thing is true with medicine. You got to
Speaker 1: get people involved in their own health and that of
Speaker 1: their family, and after a while they're going to say,
Speaker 1: you know, we need to stop giving government money to
Speaker 1: these corrupt institutions, not just the fact that it not
Speaker 1: just for economic reasons, but for many reasons. So he says,
Speaker 1: this involves occupying the spaces that medicine has temporarily taken
Speaker 1: over in the same way that the Czech dissidents did.
Speaker 1: He said, these parallel institutions need not constitute a ghetto
Speaker 1: or even an underground They're not a black market system
Speaker 1: that is hiding in the shadows. Now, things like education,
Speaker 1: healthcare are important enough that if we have to have
Speaker 1: it underground or hide in the shadows, we'll do that.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't have to be that way, not yet,
Speaker 1: he said. Admittedly, every institution of the parallel polus will
Speaker 1: be a David facing the goliath of a massively powerful
Speaker 1: and totalizing medical system. Anyone or another of these institutions
Speaker 1: could be crushed by state machinery, and of course we
Speaker 1: saw this. I mentioned this. The first time I ever
Speaker 1: really saw community power have an effect at a state
Speaker 1: government was when in North Carolina, the completely controlled state government,
Speaker 1: completely controlled by Democrats wanted to do what the state
Speaker 1: Teachers Union wanted to shut down at homeschooling, and homeschooling
Speaker 1: was really small at that point, and so we all
Speaker 1: did letter writing campaign and they backed off. I mean,
Speaker 1: we were talking about the House, the Senate, the governor,
Speaker 1: all Democrats, and the teachers Union had a lot of clout,
Speaker 1: a lot of money, but there was enough of a
Speaker 1: letter writing campaign from a very active, small minority of
Speaker 1: people they backed them off. At the behest of governments,
Speaker 1: medical institutions during COVID demanded we become disempowered and isolated.
Speaker 1: People globally seated their sovereignty abandoned social solidarity. By contrast,
Speaker 1: the new parallel institutions of medicine must return sovereignty to individuals, families,
Speaker 1: and communities and strengthen social solidarity. These institutions must help
Speaker 1: people take responsibility for their health and must always support
Speaker 1: the doctor patient relationship, minimizing external intrusions on this relationship. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I got to say, you know, when I talked to
Speaker 1: the RNC stores dot com where they've they've got you know,
Speaker 1: B seventeen. You can get it in the form of
Speaker 1: a pill, you can get it in terms of the
Speaker 1: seeds that are there, like little nuts and things like that.
Speaker 1: But he's got a wealth of information as well, and
Speaker 1: he's really fought this battle really on the side, and
Speaker 1: so has g Edward Griffin. And when I interviewed je Griffin,
Speaker 1: I'll never forget the quote because I thought it was
Speaker 1: so perfect. He said, we always talked about individual liberty,
Speaker 1: but he goes, we have to work collectively for individual liberty,
Speaker 1: and that's really true. We have to speak out, we
Speaker 1: have to you know, pass books around, write books if
Speaker 1: you can write books, but at least pass around the
Speaker 1: kind of work that you Edward Griffin has done that
Speaker 1: type of thing. By the way, they set up a thing.
Speaker 1: We haven't really formalized it on our website, but you
Speaker 1: can get ten percent off at RNC stores dot com
Speaker 1: off of their books, off of the B seventeen that
Speaker 1: they sell their Just use a code at night and
Speaker 1: you can get money off that. But that's exactly the
Speaker 1: type of thing that and many others like it. Educating people,
Speaker 1: giving them alternatives. That is what we need to be
Speaker 1: focusing on. So he talks about the homeschooling parallel. He said,
Speaker 1: we need to plant seeds that probably won't germinate in
Speaker 1: our lifetime. He said, thing about this in a fifty
Speaker 1: to one hundred year increment, and then he goes back
Speaker 1: to homeschooling. I thought, yeah, it really has been fifty years.
Speaker 1: He said, Back in nineteen seventy three, fifty years ago,
Speaker 1: there were thirteen thousand homeschoolers. Today there are five million. See,
Speaker 1: we can win. We just have to be determined, we
Speaker 1: have to be committed, We have to have principles that
Speaker 1: we're going to stand for. Not following politicians. These people
Speaker 1: are just shape shifters. But from thirteen thousand homeschoolers in
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy three, fifty one years ago, over five million today.
Speaker 1: A generation ago, parents should get a visit from Social
Speaker 1: Services for not sending their children to approved public or
Speaker 1: private schools. It was considered declass a, if not borderline criminal,
Speaker 1: to attempt to educate one's children one's self. And I
Speaker 1: remember this as well. When we were at the Libertarian Party,
Speaker 1: we went to national convention. They had people there who
Speaker 1: had been attacked and had their kids taken away from them.
Speaker 1: There had been some there were tales of some of
Speaker 1: the parents who had been killed when they fought the
Speaker 1: people who came to steal their children simply because they homeschool.
Speaker 1: We got a refugee from Germany here in this area
Speaker 1: of Tennessee who were refugees from Germany because Germany was
Speaker 1: going to lock them up and take their kids because
Speaker 1: they homeschooled them Christian family, and of course the Biden
Speaker 1: administration wanted to deport them. Only people the Biden administration
Speaker 1: wants to deport they were legitimate refugees. And so we've
Speaker 1: seen this type of thing. I've heard the stories of this,
Speaker 1: and that was in the late nineteen eighties, so that
Speaker 1: had been going on for about ten years or so,
Speaker 1: and ten to fifteen years. But now look at where
Speaker 1: we are undeterred by suspicion and by outright persecution. The
Speaker 1: homeschool movement created a parallel police reappropriating the idea of
Speaker 1: self education and autonomous learning that have been monopolized by
Speaker 1: those of advanced degrees in education. While not every homeschooler succeeded,
Speaker 1: many thrived and demonstrated that their children could get a
Speaker 1: superior education, winning spelling bees, acting acing standardized exams, and
Speaker 1: earning admission to persigious universities. And for a fraction of
Speaker 1: the cost of other schools. These pioneers formed co ops
Speaker 1: and later founded private or charter schools. This movement eventually
Speaker 1: changed the face of institutional education. Homeschooling is now part
Speaker 1: of the mainstream, and the resources to facilitate it have multiplied.
Speaker 1: But I'm going to tell you this, the people that
Speaker 1: did it primarily done because of their Christian determination. That
Speaker 1: is the vast majority of this. These are parents who
Speaker 1: are committed to raising their children to honor God. That's
Speaker 1: their number one commitment, and that's why they fear religion
Speaker 1: so much. It is something that they can't control. People
Speaker 1: do anything to follow their faith if they're committed, and
Speaker 1: that's a very dangerous thing for governments. But they were
Speaker 1: not able to stop it. I remember when we got
Speaker 1: into it and I was thinking about it, I thought,
Speaker 1: you know, it's kind of interesting to see how this
Speaker 1: area is opening up in every area of my life.
Speaker 1: I have seen constantly, I've seen every area of my
Speaker 1: life being shut down in terms of freedom of choice,
Speaker 1: you know, economically, trying to take away cars, trying to
Speaker 1: tell us what appliances we can have just name it,
Speaker 1: you know, not just the green agenda either, it's everything
Speaker 1: else that they want to control, except in one area,
Speaker 1: and all of a sudden, going against the grain in
Speaker 1: the opposite direction, we see this opening up of freedom
Speaker 1: and a flowering of freedom. It's being done by people
Speaker 1: who have set themselves to honor God. God will always
Speaker 1: honor those who honor Him. That's a promise. And so
Speaker 1: I looked at that and I thought that truly is amazing.
Speaker 1: This is the one area of life in America where
Speaker 1: freedom is increasing. It's because of people who honor God.
Speaker 1: That has so many lessons. That's far more important than,
Speaker 1: you know, the political structures or ways that we're going
Speaker 1: to organize each other, or the historical precedence for this stuff. Folks.
Speaker 1: What we need to have in this country is a
Speaker 1: movement back towards God. And it's one at a time.
Speaker 1: One at a time is not something where you've got
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk or somebody preaching up on a podium, bringing
Speaker 1: in some really dodgy characters as well. But you know,
Speaker 1: it's about our individual commitment. And on that individual level level,
Speaker 1: I have seen God work in our life and in
Speaker 1: the life of other people. And you have probably seen
Speaker 1: it either with yourself, with other people, with all these
Speaker 1: vaccine mandates and lockdowns. A lot of people refuse to
Speaker 1: do that for religious reasons, and they saw a god
Speaker 1: move to honor that God will always honor those who
Speaker 1: honor Him if that's your sincere desire in that, and
Speaker 1: He knows your heart. So these pioneers form co ops.
Speaker 1: The found in private charter schools change the face of education.
Speaker 1: Homeschooling is now part of the mainstream. Medicine today needs
Speaker 1: its own equivalent of the homeschool movement. Just as homeschooling
Speaker 1: deinstitutionalized education, so we need to de medicalize healthcare, at
Speaker 1: least to some extent. And let me just add here
Speaker 1: there's another parallel to it. I mean, look at how
Speaker 1: many people refuse to get the jab because they had
Speaker 1: religious concerns. They had religious concerns about moving the overton
Speaker 1: window towards the mark of the beast, or actually making
Speaker 1: it a mark of the beast. It doesn't have to
Speaker 1: be the mark of the beast. It was a mark
Speaker 1: of the beast, that's for sure. And because they did
Speaker 1: not want to have something that had been created by
Speaker 1: immoral purposes, by abortion, by the perpetuation of these cannibalized
Speaker 1: cells and other things. If we fight back against this
Speaker 1: because of our religious beliefs and because we want to
Speaker 1: honor God. That applies to the medical society especially, well
Speaker 1: you talk about corruption. Doctors and nurses need not be
Speaker 1: the only game in town. Perhaps in fifty years, this
Speaker 1: decentralized healthcare movement will positively influence directly or indirectly the
Speaker 1: practice of institutionalized medicine. I don't see it working that way.
Speaker 1: I don't see homeschooling as a competition. I don't see
Speaker 1: it making the government schools better, the public schools better.
Speaker 1: They've gotten a lot worse, and I don't think that's
Speaker 1: going to happen with There's not anything that's going to
Speaker 1: reform the medical industry and the way they're killing people.
Speaker 1: The kind of democratizing movement empowering ordinary people to act
Speaker 1: autonomously in their own self care is not without historical president.
Speaker 1: In the nineteenth century, there were practical books for the
Speaker 1: domestic practice of medicine, and they enjoyed wide popularity. And
Speaker 1: again that's why I talked about RNC store dot com.
Speaker 1: Take a look at the books that are there. Educate
Speaker 1: yourself about what you can do, and get away from
Speaker 1: the medical stuff. Just like in our family. You can't
Speaker 1: you can't identify every poison that is out there, so
Speaker 1: they have to categorically reject. It's kind of like when
Speaker 1: people talk about scoping out counterfeit money. They would say,
Speaker 1: in the days when we weren't rapidly changing the currency,
Speaker 1: you know, what they would do is they would train
Speaker 1: tellers to spot counterfeit money by showing them the real thing.
Speaker 1: And if they learned everything about the real thing, then
Speaker 1: they could see that. You know, they couldn't train them
Speaker 1: on every variation of counterfeit. They just need to train
Speaker 1: them on the real thing. We don't need to be
Speaker 1: necessarily warned about every poison created by the pharmachia. We
Speaker 1: just need to start to realize what the real stuff is.
Speaker 1: And so that's what he's saying, go back to a standard.
Speaker 1: One of the most popular of these was a book
Speaker 1: that was one of the most popular books between seventeen
Speaker 1: eighty one and the mid eighteen hundreds is by doctor
Speaker 1: William Buchan. It was called Domestic Medicine. They carried the
Speaker 1: subtitle an attempt to render the medical art more generally
Speaker 1: useful by showing people what is in their own power,
Speaker 1: both with respect to prevention and to the cure of disease.
Speaker 1: Although the author was a member of the Royal College
Speaker 1: of Physicians in Edinburgh, the most prestigious medical institution of
Speaker 1: the day, he was highly critical of the medical profession's
Speaker 1: monopolistic elitism, writing that quote, no discovery can ever be
Speaker 1: of general utility while the practice of it is kept
Speaker 1: in the hands of a few, like Benjamin Russell in
Speaker 1: the US Buchanan. Buchan rather maintained a general skepticism toward
Speaker 1: the value of drugs, preferring like the hippocratic physicians, to
Speaker 1: focus on diet and preventative measures. He said, I think
Speaker 1: the administration of medicines are always doubtful and often dangerous,
Speaker 1: and would much rather teach me how to avoid the
Speaker 1: necessity of using them then how they should be used. Exactly,
Speaker 1: Recognize the real stuff. Let food be your medicine. That's
Speaker 1: what the hypocritic physicians would say. Recognize the real stuff,
Speaker 1: focus on healthy things, write nutrition and other stuff in
Speaker 1: a positive way, as opposed to this Rockefella allopathic model. Today,
Speaker 1: the specific medical content of these books is less instructive
Speaker 1: than the fact of their enormous popularity. Which indicated a
Speaker 1: culture that generally embraced a model of autonomous self care
Speaker 1: with lay medical wisdom cultivated in the context of the family.
Speaker 1: As they say, lay. Yeah, because these people see themselves
Speaker 1: as clergy, as a priesthood.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: This was likewise a period of intense iatrogenic medical injuries,
Speaker 1: when mainstream medicine's mainstays included harmful blood letting and emetic
Speaker 1: purges for most diseases. Now, these are the people about
Speaker 1: the same period of time, Right, I'm seventeen eighty one,
Speaker 1: at eighteen hundreds, it's too bad. George Washington trusted the physicians.
Speaker 1: They took about half of his blood and gave him
Speaker 1: mercury and killed him after he got a cold from
Speaker 1: writing around his property. And so yeah, is the same
Speaker 1: type of thing. We need to return to that. And
Speaker 1: of course today it's even easier because the information that
Speaker 1: is available on the Internet. I know a lot of
Speaker 1: it is trying to be trying to censor a lot
Speaker 1: of it, but there still is a wealth of information
Speaker 1: available to people that was not there. And as they
Speaker 1: tried to censor this and as they push out propaganda,
Speaker 1: as I said, I was saved from one of these drugs,
Speaker 1: the fires of drug that was recommended to me because
Speaker 1: of heart issues and things. I looked it up. I
Speaker 1: looked it up first. I looked it up on web MD. Oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: no problem, this is great. It's new, new and improved
Speaker 1: and all the rest of this stuff. And I kept
Speaker 1: looking and I saw the sites where people were talking
Speaker 1: about it, not just the rapacious fees, the price that
Speaker 1: was being done by Fizer. Everybody was talking about how
Speaker 1: expensive it was. That's a big tip off, isn't it,
Speaker 1: But also by the people who had taken it and
Speaker 1: had been harmed by it. So yeah, never did even
Speaker 1: fill that prescription. We're gonna take a quick break and
Speaker 1: we will be right back. You're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show. M Sellers. Our daughter was bullied. One reason
Speaker 1: why we homeschooled. We moved on and she's fine. Good,
Speaker 1: that's good. Look, we've all been bullied, right. And one
Speaker 1: of the things I used to tell people when they
Speaker 1: would say homeschooling, what do you You can't socialize your
Speaker 1: kids that way? And I said, well, yes you can.
Speaker 1: I said. The difference is they're not being socialized in
Speaker 1: the Lord of the Flies way. You may want to
Speaker 1: read that novel because that kind of exposes what we
Speaker 1: all experienced when we went through school. You know, it's
Speaker 1: like there's this pecking order. It's like a bunch of chickens.
Speaker 1: You know, now that we're keeping chickens, you see this
Speaker 1: kind of stuff. But of course we experienced it ourselves
Speaker 1: when we went through school. Bullying is always a part
Speaker 1: of that. That was one of the reasons why you know,
Speaker 1: God gave us families. You know, you are there as parents.
Speaker 1: You've got children that you can watch when child starts
Speaker 1: to bully another child, you step in. You can see
Speaker 1: it better when you've got an adult to child ratio
Speaker 1: that is, you know, one to three or something like that,
Speaker 1: as opposed to one to forty or whatever it is
Speaker 1: in the school classroom. Yeah, it's it's always there. Ap
Speaker 1: rumble seat says, Okay, so now they're promoting Baron's issue,
Speaker 1: which makes what jab Daddy did with a warp speed
Speaker 1: even worse. So, yeah, Goy says, you can't argue with
Speaker 1: people convinced that it's for dental health. They refuse to
Speaker 1: look at any data that conflicts with their worldview. It
Speaker 1: is a flooride cult and this is the reason why
Speaker 1: when I would talk to people, I would focus on Okay,
Speaker 1: so you say that it's good. Do you realize that
Speaker 1: the difference between medicine and poison is dosage. How do
Speaker 1: you control the dosage if you dump it into the water?
Speaker 1: Are you crazy? Same dosage for a baby is for
Speaker 1: an adult male. Is again that when you approach it
Speaker 1: from that standpoint, these people can't come up with competing studies.
Speaker 1: It makes absolutely no sense to put any medication into
Speaker 1: the water, especially one that has to be controlled for
Speaker 1: dosage that has a proven harm level. If it exceeds
Speaker 1: a certain concentration, that should be a non starter. I
Speaker 1: think that is the line of attack that we had
Speaker 1: to take with all these people. Let's not argue about
Speaker 1: how many angels fit on the head of the pen.
Speaker 1: Let's just talk about the fact that you're dumping this
Speaker 1: into the water. Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. Thank you. Let's talk a little bit
Speaker 1: about the other mcguffin besides the germ games and the drugs.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about climate because now we've got the World
Speaker 1: Economic Forum demanding that you not grow food at home
Speaker 1: because we stop the global warming right there, are things
Speaker 1: that we can do, folks, and we have to understand
Speaker 1: we got to do it at the local level. Just
Speaker 1: like the sheriff who deputize everybody, just like the santis
Speaker 1: who said get FEMA out of here, just like the
Speaker 1: homeschoolers who stood up on the local level. We're going
Speaker 1: to have to do that even protect our food supply.
Speaker 1: Better start thinking out of the box. We better start
Speaker 1: understanding the doctrine of the lesser magistrate. We better start
Speaker 1: focusing on local politics, and we better start we better
Speaker 1: start understanding the principles that we're going to stand on.
Speaker 1: This is going to be a spiritual fight to understand
Speaker 1: what the principles are that you're fighting for and how
Speaker 1: you're right. Stop listening to people like Pinwheel Freel, Todd
Speaker 1: Friel and stuff. Well, if the government tells you to
Speaker 1: put a pinwheel on your head, you put a pinwheel
Speaker 1: on your head. And he said that in August of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, when everybody knew that the government was
Speaker 1: going to mandate these shots. So if the government says
Speaker 1: you've got to inject an experimental mRNA shot, you do it.
Speaker 1: According to Todd Freel, and he tries to tell you
Speaker 1: that that's what God said. No, that's what Todd Frehel said.
Speaker 1: God says just the opposite. You better, you know, build up,
Speaker 1: you know, get yourself prepared mentally and spiritually for this battle.
Speaker 1: You better know where you stand and why you stand
Speaker 1: on this stuff, because they're going to come after everything.
Speaker 1: They're coming after food. World Economic Forum is demanding that
Speaker 1: government's enforced bans on members of the general public growing
Speaker 1: their own food at home. So it's not just the
Speaker 1: farm that they want to shut down to stop meat
Speaker 1: and dairy. They want to stop you from even growing
Speaker 1: your own vegetables or having your own chickens or whatever.
Speaker 1: Experts quote unquote talk about the so called carbon footprint.
Speaker 1: I would love to give these guys a carbon footprint
Speaker 1: right on their backside. The carbon footprint of home grown
Speaker 1: food is destroying the planet. So let's destroy your life.
Speaker 1: Let's destroy people. Let's destroy your your life expectancy as
Speaker 1: well as your quality of life. The World Economic Form
Speaker 1: and other globalist climate zealots are now demanding, not asking,
Speaker 1: but demanding that governments intervene and ban individuals from growing
Speaker 1: their own food in order to save the planet from
Speaker 1: global warming. They want it net zero of people. They
Speaker 1: want net zero of choices. They want to depopulate us,
Speaker 1: they want to starve us. Shut down the farms, and
Speaker 1: even shut down your home garden. That's how ridiculous this is.
Speaker 1: Allowing citizens to grow their own food will undermine efforts
Speaker 1: to meet the goals of net zero, says the World
Speaker 1: Economic Form and the UN. The research indicated that garden
Speaker 1: to table produce produce causes a far greater carbon footprint
Speaker 1: than conventional agricultural practices such as rural farms. Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, this doesn't even pass a sniff test of
Speaker 1: logic any food source other than garden to table. It's
Speaker 1: going to require transportation, packaging, all kinds of things, right,
Speaker 1: and there's a lot of transportation as As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: you know Jack Lawson we're talking about He said, you
Speaker 1: stop and think about how are just in time supply
Speaker 1: chain is? He said this way before what happened in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty when I was interviewing him. But you stop
Speaker 1: and think about how at every stage of production there's
Speaker 1: transportation involved. So how could that possibly be true by
Speaker 1: their own logic? Okay, moving things around is they've always
Speaker 1: told us we've got to stop the cars. We've got
Speaker 1: to stop the trucks, we've got to stop all transportation.
Speaker 1: And yet now they're saying that if you walk from
Speaker 1: your garden to your table, that that's going to be
Speaker 1: more carbon intensive, significantly more carbon intensive then growing it
Speaker 1: in a remote area, whether it is another part of
Speaker 1: the state or whether it is in another country. No,
Speaker 1: that's going to be less than you growing your own food.
Speaker 1: We know what they're doing. So they hired some prostitutes
Speaker 1: at the University of Michigan who they paid them to
Speaker 1: do research. And of course we talk about this, you know,
Speaker 1: whenever you got somebody to do research, just like we
Speaker 1: talked about the pharmaceutical companies. Right, you can have three
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical companies that have three different drugs, all to address
Speaker 1: the same issue, and they all hire people do studies.
Speaker 1: And guess what people did the studies. It's always Brand
Speaker 1: A that wins. When it's the brand A people funding
Speaker 1: the study. Then the people who funded the study for
Speaker 1: brand B, they find that brand B is better, and
Speaker 1: same thing with Brand C and so on. Right, these
Speaker 1: people know who is paying them. So this was published
Speaker 1: in the journal Nature Cities. Nature Cities. That's a suspect
Speaker 1: right there. How much carbon dioxide was produced when growing food?
Speaker 1: They said, well, on an average, a serving of food
Speaker 1: made from traditional farms creates zero point zero seven kilograms
Speaker 1: of CO two. According to the study, The World Economic
Speaker 1: Form funded researchers claim that the impact on the environment
Speaker 1: is almost five times higher, and they come up with
Speaker 1: a number, and folks, these numbers don't mean anything. But
Speaker 1: what you need to see here is that they're putting
Speaker 1: a bigger crosshair on small home gardens than they are
Speaker 1: even on independent farms. The most significant contributor to carbon
Speaker 1: emissions on the urban agriculture sites we studied was the
Speaker 1: infrastructure used to grow the food. Again, this is utter nonsense,
Speaker 1: and they'll never stop with this until we stop them,
Speaker 1: until we stop the people that they have bought, these
Speaker 1: so called researchers who are nothing but court gesters, and
Speaker 1: the pliable politicians who will do anything these people tell
Speaker 1: them to do. So, these people doing the research grouped
Speaker 1: urban agriculture sites into three different categories, individual or family gardens,
Speaker 1: collective gardens such as a community garden, or larger, commercial
Speaker 1: oriented urban farms. They also found other factors that they
Speaker 1: claimed are hazardous poorly managed composts and other synthetic inputs
Speaker 1: contribute to global warming, they worn. They further advised that
Speaker 1: fruit was eight point six times more eco friendly when
Speaker 1: grown conventionally compared to in a city. So if you're
Speaker 1: going to get your bananas shipped in from foreign countries,
Speaker 1: that's better than you know, growing bananas or any other
Speaker 1: kind of fruit in a greenhouse. It's amazing to me
Speaker 1: that they would literally put this stuff out. The insist
Speaker 1: that people should be limited when it comes to keeping
Speaker 1: plants inside their homes as well. So you don't even
Speaker 1: shouldn't be allowed have houseplants because you know CO two?
Speaker 1: Did these idiots realize that plants take in CO two
Speaker 1: and give off oxygen? That's one of the reasons why
Speaker 1: people keep plants in their house. This thing is so
Speaker 1: incredibly stupid it doesn't even pass the snifftest. That's why
Speaker 1: I call these people prostitutes. If you're going to come
Speaker 1: up with a report like this for somebody who paid you,
Speaker 1: you have absolutely no integrity and you'll sell your soul
Speaker 1: to sell these lives with these people. So again, vegetables
Speaker 1: were five point eight times better when grown far away
Speaker 1: from the city. And fruit was eight point six times
Speaker 1: better when it was grown far away from the city.
Speaker 1: None of this stuff makes any sense. And then they said,
Speaker 1: you don't want to have any plants in your house.
Speaker 1: The World Economic Forum researchers quote unquote said that there's
Speaker 1: carbon emissions from the trucks that train support plants, plastic pots,
Speaker 1: and synthetic fertilizers. Well, they're transporting a lot of materials
Speaker 1: to farms and other places. And not only that, but
Speaker 1: then they have to transport what they produce idiotic. Again,
Speaker 1: all this is nonsense in the first place. If we're
Speaker 1: going to play the game of who has the lower
Speaker 1: CO two emissions, folks, then what they've got us doing
Speaker 1: is the same game as the preferred pronouns. I refuse
Speaker 1: to play this game. I'm not going to talk about
Speaker 1: carbon footprints. I'm not going to talk about emissions. I'm
Speaker 1: not going to talk about this versus that is more
Speaker 1: or less CO two. That's preferred pronouns of the climate kind,
Speaker 1: the preferred pronouns of the third kind. I guess we
Speaker 1: could say, if you play with those games, it's going
Speaker 1: to go the same way as it does to the
Speaker 1: preferred pronouns. First of all. These people are crazy. They
Speaker 1: have absolutely detached for reality. Why they're telling you you
Speaker 1: should pay no attention to these people. And if you
Speaker 1: do pay attention to them, and you do go along
Speaker 1: with their game, whether it's preferred pronouns or CO two emissions,
Speaker 1: then what you'll find is that they'll come up with
Speaker 1: something else. This is all about making you bow to them.
Speaker 1: It is all about taking everything away from you. So
Speaker 1: don't play these games, don't engage in their double speak
Speaker 1: or their double think, and don't play around with their
Speaker 1: CO two preferred pronouns. So Susan Pell, the director of
Speaker 1: the US Botanic Garden in Washington, DC, argues that members
Speaker 1: of the general public should at least still be able
Speaker 1: to grow potted plants at home. She said, they just
Speaker 1: need to consider the environmental harm of indoor gardening. There
Speaker 1: is no environmental harm just because this person's got a
Speaker 1: cushy job at the the US Botanic Garden in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. But she knows where her bread is buttered,
Speaker 1: and she's going to push this nonsense. They're going to
Speaker 1: put a guilt trip on you for even having indoor plants,
Speaker 1: but they'll tolerate it for now. And then eventually you
Speaker 1: play along with these preferred pronouns and eventually they got
Speaker 1: something else, and eventually they'll come in and they'll take
Speaker 1: away even your indoor plants. That's the game here. And
Speaker 1: so slay News is talking about this, says, well, we've
Speaker 1: talked about fourteen major American cities that have set a
Speaker 1: target to comply with World Economic Forums Green Agenda goals
Speaker 1: by banning meat and dairy and products by twenty three.
Speaker 1: Of course, this is the c forty initiative New York
Speaker 1: and London. It was Sadikon, It was Bloomberg who began this,
Speaker 1: and it was New York and London, and then they
Speaker 1: got it out to forty cities and now it's more
Speaker 1: than one hundred cities worldwide. But there's about fourteen major
Speaker 1: American cities that are involved in it. New York is
Speaker 1: still at the epicenter of it. And we talked about
Speaker 1: the fact that Eric Adams is pushing this idea We're
Speaker 1: going to start measuring all the meat and dairy used
Speaker 1: and you know, given out by the New York City
Speaker 1: and in the schools and all the rest of this stuff,
Speaker 1: to start measuring it. You know, if you want to
Speaker 1: lock up Eric Adams. The first thing you ought to
Speaker 1: lock him up with is four is this Sea forty thing?
Speaker 1: You ought to put him in jail for that? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know he's probably a crook, you know, I don't
Speaker 1: know what it is. Again, I'm not sure what's going
Speaker 1: why the Turkish government wants to buy the mayor of
Speaker 1: New York. I don't know what's going on. But this
Speaker 1: is total betrail. Just to remind you, the Sea forty
Speaker 1: cities are the ones who said that by twenty thirty,
Speaker 1: zero meat, zero dairy, three new clothing items per person
Speaker 1: per year, no private vehicles, and you can have one
Speaker 1: short flight and the nine hundred miles a short flight
Speaker 1: of nine hundred miles or less once every three years.
Speaker 1: Are we going to put up with this nonsense? But again,
Speaker 1: this is what city con this is what Eric Adams,
Speaker 1: is what London, New York and many other big cities want,
Speaker 1: and it's what Letitia James is corrupt state Attorney General
Speaker 1: in New York. It's amazing to me, the worst attorney
Speaker 1: journal I've ever seen in my life. It's not just
Speaker 1: she came after Trump, She's come after everything. She's also
Speaker 1: suing JBSUSA because they produced beef. She blasted the agricultural
Speaker 1: industry and argued that beef production has the largest greenhouse
Speaker 1: gas footprint of any major food commodity. Well, I think
Speaker 1: she's the biggest belcher of gas I've ever seen in
Speaker 1: my life. She claimed that animal agriculture accounts for fourteen
Speaker 1: and a half percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. Well,
Speaker 1: I guess the other eighty five percent is coming from
Speaker 1: politicians like her. Right, So you think that this is
Speaker 1: just a pine in the sky plant, it's sorry being
Speaker 1: implemented in the UK. And guess what as of October
Speaker 1: the first, they've got a chicken license. You've got to
Speaker 1: register every single bird that you have. I mean they
Speaker 1: redefine the definition of a flock down to a single bird.
Speaker 1: You got one chicken, you got to report it. You
Speaker 1: got one pet bird, Oh, you got to report it.
Speaker 1: Because see what they're using is this phony bird flu mcguffin.
Speaker 1: Nobody's died, nobody's gotten sick, but they're using that as
Speaker 1: an excuse to register all chickens. This is about implementing
Speaker 1: you can't grow your own food. I mean, we've gotten
Speaker 1: up to the point Karen did a great job, Karen
Speaker 1: and my son who's now sick, but did a great
Speaker 1: job with the chickens. We're now getting about twenty eggs
Speaker 1: a day. Sone things to do with them, given them
Speaker 1: to people. There's a lot of people who need them
Speaker 1: right now. But these are unlicensed chickens and they will
Speaker 1: never be licensed. So the UK's chicken license is in
Speaker 1: full effect. That's October the first, and the people in
Speaker 1: the UK have found a unique way to rebel against this.
Speaker 1: As I think it was Grant Ulysses Grant who said
Speaker 1: the way to get rid of a bad law is
Speaker 1: to rigorously enforce it. Well, these people have kind of
Speaker 1: done the opposite thing, from the grassroots level malicious compliance
Speaker 1: with it. They're reporting everything that could be imagined to
Speaker 1: be a bird, including rubber chickens, and they have overwhelmed
Speaker 1: this petty little bureaucracy that wants to register and give
Speaker 1: everybody a chicken license. They have overwhelmed them. It's like
Speaker 1: DDS or you know, the directed denial of service, except
Speaker 1: I guess you could say this is a directed denial
Speaker 1: of registration. They can't register anybody because they've gotten so
Speaker 1: much traffic on the site. They've shut it down. So
Speaker 1: back in March they announced that there was an emergency
Speaker 1: with bird flu. Right, so in seven months, this is
Speaker 1: the way that we saw this stuff roll out, with
Speaker 1: the lockdown, pandemic and everything that Trump was doing and
Speaker 1: Biden was doing. Okay, it's an emergency, so you're going
Speaker 1: to do this today, and then in two months or
Speaker 1: six months or whatever, you're going to do this next thing.
Speaker 1: And then when you get to that next thing, that
Speaker 1: tell you, Okay, we told you we're going to do
Speaker 1: this two months ago because of an emergency, and so
Speaker 1: now you're going to do this today, and now two
Speaker 1: months from now you're going to have to do the
Speaker 1: next step of the emergency. Well, if it's an emergency,
Speaker 1: you do it all at once. You don't do it,
Speaker 1: as Fauci said, from the inside with disruption and iteratively.
Speaker 1: And when you see this being done disruptively from the inside,
Speaker 1: especially the iterative nature of it, this is not in
Speaker 1: response to an emergency. And there is no emergency with
Speaker 1: bird flu, not at all, not even for the birds,
Speaker 1: but certainly not for people. So they used to define
Speaker 1: a flock as fifty birds or more, and they redefine
Speaker 1: that down to a flock of one. We need to
Speaker 1: have an army of one to oppose these people. I
Speaker 1: wonder what you call a group of politicians. You call
Speaker 1: them a gaggle. That's what I'd like to do. I'd
Speaker 1: like to gaggle these politicians. I think that's what we
Speaker 1: got to do. Maybe you call it, like was it ravens.
Speaker 1: They call them a murder. Well, that'd be a good
Speaker 1: term for a group of politicians.
Speaker 2: Murder.
Speaker 1: It's a murder of politicians. That'll get me flagged. From
Speaker 1: now on, everybody in the country who keeps even a
Speaker 1: single not just chickens, has to register as a poultry
Speaker 1: keeper to protect people from bird flu or not as
Speaker 1: single case. But you know, we got Robert Redfield that
Speaker 1: the maga media is now cheering because now he's said
Speaker 1: good things about Trump and about RFK Junior. So maga
Speaker 1: media is cheering Robert Redfield, the CDC director who was
Speaker 1: responsible for all this superstitious shutdown of everything under Trump,
Speaker 1: and the guy who just a couple of months ago
Speaker 1: was telling everybody, well, it's inevitable bird flu is going
Speaker 1: to come after the people. When it does, we're going
Speaker 1: to have casualty rates of twenty five to fifty twenty
Speaker 1: five people get bird flour, going to die from it,
Speaker 1: he said. But now he's being cheered by maga people.
Speaker 1: Oh it's great. I love what Trump's going to do.
Speaker 1: I love RFK Junior and his idea for make America
Speaker 1: healthy again. You see, that's the danger of Trump that
Speaker 1: as soon as some person who ought to be in
Speaker 1: the docks, you want to talk about Nuremberg two point zero,
Speaker 1: he's one of the people that needs to be there.
Speaker 1: Robert Redfield, the director of the CDC, during this nonsense.
Speaker 1: He needs to be brought up on charges in jail
Speaker 1: for crimes against humanity. But as soon as he endorses Trump,
Speaker 1: he's a good guy and he's being cheered by the
Speaker 1: maga media and the maga people. That's the danger of Trump.
Speaker 1: Trump has absolutely no principles, and the people who follow
Speaker 1: him will excuse anything that he does. I mean, we
Speaker 1: see Hillary Clinton coming out and saying we got to
Speaker 1: have control of the media. Who are about to lose
Speaker 1: control of the media. Well, yeah, Trump is said essentially
Speaker 1: the same thing. You know, we need to take the
Speaker 1: license of ABC. Look at that's so unfair the way
Speaker 1: they ran that debate. They need to lose their license.
Speaker 1: He sounds just like La La. He sounds just like Hillary.
Speaker 1: The difference is is that if Hillary would have done
Speaker 1: the stuff to us that Trump did, nobody would have
Speaker 1: There would have been a big pushback against it. It
Speaker 1: would have been a rebellion. So what are the people
Speaker 1: in the UK doing about their rebellion. Well, the people
Speaker 1: of the UK have a tried and tested method of
Speaker 1: dealing with absurdity, even more absurdity. So in the run
Speaker 1: up to the deadline, thousands of people took to the
Speaker 1: website to register their chickens. They registered frozen chicken, they
Speaker 1: registered chicken nuggets, they registered unhatched chicken, and they even
Speaker 1: registered rubber chicken. And they put this up on social
Speaker 1: media to show people, just completed my chicken registration, here's
Speaker 1: my three chickens. And so as a result, scroll down
Speaker 1: and you can see what we are experiencing, extremely high
Speaker 1: volume of applications. We're currently aimed to process applications within
Speaker 1: thirty days. And then they go on to say, if
Speaker 1: you've already submitted an application, do not submit another one.
Speaker 1: But the people of the UK say, well, if you've
Speaker 1: already submitted an application, do submit another one, right, you
Speaker 1: can come up with a lot of things that you
Speaker 1: can submit to them, all kinds of birds. In England
Speaker 1: and Wales, they said you must regis sure if you
Speaker 1: keep poultry or other captive birds by October the first.
Speaker 1: This includes any birds that you keep as pets, and
Speaker 1: you are breaking the law if you do not register.
Speaker 1: And then further down you see all the instructions keep
Speaker 1: going down DC it in yellow. Our online service is
Speaker 1: currently unavailable due to technical issues. That's why I said
Speaker 1: that is the directed denial of registration. It's kind of
Speaker 1: like a DDS attack, right, the power of malicious compliance. Well,
Speaker 1: we're going to take a quick break and we're going
Speaker 1: to come back and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: I just want to say Karen is doing a great job.
Speaker 1: She's felling in. Travis has gone back with his wife
Speaker 1: to Texas. Are going to have a baby in about
Speaker 1: six weeks, I guess, and maybe less four months. Four weeks,
Speaker 1: all right, And so she wanted to be there with
Speaker 1: a physician that she's known for a long time. And
Speaker 1: then col Sir is still down with this poison from
Speaker 1: the medical establishment, and we would appreciate your prayers for that,
Speaker 1: but he's unable to do this, and so Karen has
Speaker 1: jumped into an area that she does not feel comfortable with.
Speaker 1: But she's doing a great job, so thank you for that.
Speaker 1: And she's still doing the birds and the gardening as well,
Speaker 1: and the cooking and stuff like that. So it's it's
Speaker 1: been she's really stretched stretched thin. Well. The UK is
Speaker 1: facing economic groin with the world's highest electricity prices, and
Speaker 1: we talk about that side of the attack in a second,
Speaker 1: but before we do, I just want to there's some
Speaker 1: comments and want to respond to Nights of the Storm.
Speaker 1: Good to see they're Jason or Angry Tiger. Not sure.
Speaker 1: I think it's Jason, he said. I think it was
Speaker 1: Handy who mentioned to me that the reason Bill Gates
Speaker 1: bought all that farmland was likely to feed the elites
Speaker 1: with real food as a poisonoer star of us. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. You know they can keep that for themselves,
Speaker 1: and they can in the same way they're going to
Speaker 1: do with electricity, right as they shut down the power
Speaker 1: grid for us for all practical purposes, and what power
Speaker 1: we have will be intermittent and unbelievably expensive. Yeah, maggot,
Speaker 1: take a look at what you're spending now. You know
Speaker 1: he's been one hundred dollars, two hundred dollars a month,
Speaker 1: three hundred dollars, I don't know, but just multiply that
Speaker 1: by a factor of five or more. So already more
Speaker 1: than four times more expensive than that. In the UK,
Speaker 1: we're going down right down the same path, and we've
Speaker 1: seen our electricity prices increased by about a third because
Speaker 1: of these same things that have been done in the UK.
Speaker 1: So you know, you're paying one hundred dollars a month now,
Speaker 1: think about having a five hundred dollars a month pour bill.
Speaker 1: We're paying three hundred dollars a month, think about fifteen
Speaker 1: hundred about that. So they want Audi modern retro radio.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: He says. The government tells us not to grow our
Speaker 1: own food, not to educate our own children, not to
Speaker 1: worship the almighty, not to help others in dire straits,
Speaker 1: and to save, not to save tangible cash. This is
Speaker 1: why I'm an agorist. Well, I'm a geinhem, That's what
Speaker 1: I am. You're an agorus. I'm a goin and I'm
Speaker 1: going to likely to stay that way, Knights of the Storms.
Speaker 1: There's also a huge spoilage factor that's right when transporting
Speaker 1: food to the point of sale. And you know what
Speaker 1: happens when it spoils, gases come out, organic gases. Now,
Speaker 1: we got to shut down every living thing, don't we? Yeah,
Speaker 1: and all the power Atomic Dog says climate change is real.
Speaker 1: One thing you learn in geology and paleontology is that
Speaker 1: there is climate has been swinging wildly for millennia. It's normal,
Speaker 1: that's right, But now they're going to hijack it, right,
Speaker 1: just like it's normal to have hurricanes in Florida. Oh
Speaker 1: but you know, now we're not going to pay much
Speaker 1: attention to helping those people. But do I tell you
Speaker 1: about my climate change narrative, my theory that this is
Speaker 1: all about man made climate change? Of course it hasn't.
Speaker 1: You know, we look at these There was just some
Speaker 1: more data that came out that showed that on a
Speaker 1: longer scale, we're still really really cool compared to normal
Speaker 1: on this planet. So let's take a look at the
Speaker 1: energy stuff. The UK is facing economic ruin with the
Speaker 1: world's highest electricity prices in folks, this is the plan
Speaker 1: for the Green New Deal people. This is the plan
Speaker 1: for the Biden administration, the law La administration to bring
Speaker 1: us along this same path. Already, the UK is four
Speaker 1: times higher than the US, and it's climbing and so
Speaker 1: are we, and it is destroying completely their industry each year.
Speaker 1: This is coming from the Daily Skeptic in the UK.
Speaker 1: They say, each year the government publishes international energy price comparisons.
Speaker 1: The data is sourced from the IEA and it covers
Speaker 1: industrial and domestic gas and electricity prices. So they look
Speaker 1: at the industrial price. It's kind of like the wholesale price. Essentially,
Speaker 1: it's not from utility to utility, but they get a
Speaker 1: wholesale deal. So it looks at that plus the domestic
Speaker 1: retail price, and then they look at it for gas
Speaker 1: as well as for electricity. The data covers twenty eight
Speaker 1: of the countries that are part of the IEA, and
Speaker 1: they just published the twenty twenty three data a few
Speaker 1: weeks ago. They said the data for some countries like
Speaker 1: Italy and Japan is patchy, hard to decipher. So he
Speaker 1: said for compari some purposes, we focus on France, Germany,
Speaker 1: the UK, Korea and the USA as well as the
Speaker 1: median price reported by the IEA. So scroll down and
Speaker 1: take a look at these the chart right there. Okay,
Speaker 1: that line down there at the bottom is US energy prices,
Speaker 1: and then way up there at the top is France, Germany, England,
Speaker 1: and the average price the one that is heavy right there,
Speaker 1: that is the British price. That's the one that they
Speaker 1: focused on. Now that one is They said when they
Speaker 1: look at the industrial gas prices that the UK is
Speaker 1: seven percent below on industrial gas, but it is quite
Speaker 1: a bit higher, as you can see, than the US.
Speaker 1: The US is five times, these other ones are about
Speaker 1: five times higher than the US in terms of natural gas,
Speaker 1: and Canada's industrial gas prices are even lower than the US,
Speaker 1: and New Zealand's gas prices are also very low. But
Speaker 1: then when you look at the industrial electricity price you
Speaker 1: see something different. Scroll down on that UK prices are
Speaker 1: four times those in the US, two point six times
Speaker 1: those of Korea, and forty six percent higher than the
Speaker 1: IEA median. So look at that that's highlighted line. Look
Speaker 1: at how much higher that is. So why is it
Speaker 1: that they're lower when you look at the gas prices,
Speaker 1: But when you look at the electricity prices, which includes
Speaker 1: gas is a component, but it's only one component. It
Speaker 1: also includes the very expensive non renewable stuff. I'd say
Speaker 1: it non renewable because they wear out, okay, but it
Speaker 1: also includes solar and wind, which they tell us are renewable,
Speaker 1: and those things are so much more expensive that even
Speaker 1: though the gas is seven percent lower, those things take
Speaker 1: it way up, so it gets forty six percent higher
Speaker 1: once you include those other components for the total cost
Speaker 1: of generating electricity, which again is going to be gas
Speaker 1: and solar and wind because they've shut down coal. So
Speaker 1: UK gas prices are below the IEA median and those
Speaker 1: of France and Germany. But when you look at the
Speaker 1: price of electricity that includes these very very expensive, intermittent,
Speaker 1: unreliable sources, it's skyrockets. They said, So we can't hope
Speaker 1: to compete in traditional energy intensive industries, not even in
Speaker 1: being able to make batteries or to have our official intelligence.
Speaker 1: All that is closed off to them. This is a
Speaker 1: path to slavery, to serfdom, to poverty, to austerity. And
Speaker 1: as we've been telling people, the group that I was
Speaker 1: with a long time ago, we would talk about the
Speaker 1: fact that cheap, available energy, reliable and cheap. It's not
Speaker 1: just about quality of life. It's not just about being
Speaker 1: able to have industry and being able to make things
Speaker 1: and have an income. It's also about life expectancy. This
Speaker 1: is part of the depopulation agenda. Life expectancy goes down
Speaker 1: when electricity prices go up, and they're soaring in the UK. Sorry,
Speaker 1: it is absolutely amazing and they're going to do it
Speaker 1: here if we don't stop this. So again, they repeat
Speaker 1: all this with domestic and you see the same pattern
Speaker 1: with domestic gas prices being slightly lower than the rest
Speaker 1: of Europe for the UK, and then when you get
Speaker 1: the overall package, including the expensive, unreliable stuff, it soars
Speaker 1: up way above everybody else. This is the path that
Speaker 1: they want. Bottom line is that the renewable electricity is
Speaker 1: so outrageously expensive that it erases the lower gas prices
Speaker 1: and it winds up giving them a two to four
Speaker 1: times higher combined price. And that's what this whole thing
Speaker 1: is about. And then they put this on as a tag.
Speaker 1: After the guy did the article at Daily Skeptic, he
Speaker 1: so stop the presses. We're going to have to wait
Speaker 1: a long time for reality to dawn, because now the
Speaker 1: government announced that it plans to spend twenty two billion
Speaker 1: pounds of our money on carbon capture and storage, which
Speaker 1: will reduce efficiency and push up the costs of gas
Speaker 1: fired electricity even further. Well, the last person to leave
Speaker 1: Britain please blow out the candles, because there won't be
Speaker 1: any lights left to switch off. But I wonder where
Speaker 1: the carbon footprint of a candle is, you know, and
Speaker 1: the emissions. I mean, we can't have that either.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: This is from Michael O'Sullivan at Real Clear Energy. He says,
Speaker 1: you want to win an election, why don't you run
Speaker 1: on cheap energy? And why don't we have somebody really
Speaker 1: running on that. You know, Trump is saying some of
Speaker 1: the stuff like a drill, baby, drill, but he's not
Speaker 1: really getting to the core of the issue. You can
Speaker 1: use slogans like that, but if you don't address the
Speaker 1: Paris fake Treaty, then what you're going to wind up
Speaker 1: with is, you know, with a President Trump or whoever
Speaker 1: comes after him on the Democrats side, they're going to
Speaker 1: run this whole thing, shut this down. The whole point
Speaker 1: of the Paris Climate Treaty is to transfer industry and
Speaker 1: manufacturing to China and to India. They're allowed to have
Speaker 1: as cheap and dirty of power plants as they wish,
Speaker 1: and everybody else has to start cutting everything down. That
Speaker 1: is at the core of it. And so he says,
Speaker 1: you know, we look at the presidential candidates are proposing
Speaker 1: all kinds of economic policies. The bottom line, though, is
Speaker 1: that free stuff is not an economic policy. Government handouts
Speaker 1: is not an economic policy. Now it is for a
Speaker 1: lot of the voters. In the same way. Then we
Speaker 1: will go around and we talk to people, what what's
Speaker 1: your favorite source of energy? And never failed to be
Speaker 1: some idiot in the in the crowd that would raise
Speaker 1: their hands say electricity, that's the product. What's your favorite
Speaker 1: source of energy? Now, usually that person's la la, you know,
Speaker 1: following us around. But the Wall Street Journal asked seven
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty registered voters why they think, and they
Speaker 1: commissioned the University of Chicago's Clark Center to get a
Speaker 1: reading from thirty nine quote top academic experts. These are
Speaker 1: economic mists, and so they asked them about things like
Speaker 1: getting rid of tax on tips, getting rid of tax
Speaker 1: on Social Security income, whether they like to see tariffs
Speaker 1: on imported goods or penalties or price gouging, or free
Speaker 1: money for first time home buyers, or for the parents
Speaker 1: of newborns, or to put caps on various drug prices.
Speaker 1: And see, this is a mixture of policies from both
Speaker 1: Trump and La LA. That's why they're not serious candidates.
Speaker 1: They're not serious candidates. These are not economic proposals. This is,
Speaker 1: you know, handing out favors to the slaves on the plantation.
Speaker 1: That's what this is about. How about if I just
Speaker 1: tweaked this a little bit for you, like any you
Speaker 1: like me better than her? And then she copies them
Speaker 1: on some of this stuff they said. So when they
Speaker 1: put this out, ordinary people said averaged sixty three percent
Speaker 1: thumbs up on these policies. The starkest contrast comes with
Speaker 1: tax and elimination, where voters are nearly eighty percent for
Speaker 1: tax elimination and economists are about ninety percent against. Well, again,
Speaker 1: these economists may always be fiscal hawks, but it's so
Speaker 1: ridiculous that the government only cares about deficit reduction when
Speaker 1: it comes to tax reduction. Oh oh, we can't do that.
Speaker 1: They're not even close, and they haven't been for decades.
Speaker 1: There's only a couple of years in the late nineties
Speaker 1: that they actually were close in terms of not increasing
Speaker 1: the not having a deficit and increasing the cumulative debt.
Speaker 1: But now we're adding about a trillion dollars every hundred days.
Speaker 1: So who cares about this? Nobody? They talk about their money,
Speaker 1: modern monetary theory and everything. It's it's absolute garbage. Why
Speaker 1: would they care about this, and why would these economists
Speaker 1: care about it? And there's other things that you can do.
Speaker 1: You can cut taxes, if you cut spending. Well, they're
Speaker 1: not going to cut spending, but again they don't care
Speaker 1: about the deficit either. Around three quarters of all voters
Speaker 1: favor economic policies that involve more government spending. That means
Speaker 1: something like one half of conservative voters are willing to
Speaker 1: suspend their principles and the interest of helping people get
Speaker 1: through tough times. And what he says is what we're
Speaker 1: looking at is the free lunch myth, as Milton Friedman
Speaker 1: described it, the belief that somehow or the other, government
Speaker 1: can spend money at no one's expense. Now, I think
Speaker 1: it is really more The way I would phrase it
Speaker 1: is that socialism is government based on theft, and they
Speaker 1: justify that theft by envy, and the reality is is
Speaker 1: that they think somebody else is going to pay for
Speaker 1: all this stuff. That's the thing they always say, Well,
Speaker 1: don't worry, this is only going to be a tax
Speaker 1: on the super rich, which is exactly what they said
Speaker 1: when they brought in the income tax. It's only going
Speaker 1: to be on the one percent of the one percent,
Speaker 1: and even they aren't going to pay much. And then
Speaker 1: we see what we wind up with. No socialism is
Speaker 1: based its government based on theft and justified by envy.
Speaker 1: That's what we're really talking about here. What if we
Speaker 1: could give something, however, to some people without first taking
Speaker 1: money from other people. What if twenty million households are
Speaker 1: in the arrears on the utility bills and so many
Speaker 1: are living paycheck to paycheck, there must be many more
Speaker 1: who are not behind but are still struggling to pay.
Speaker 1: And wait until you know. He points out here that
Speaker 1: a price of electricity has been rising steadily since twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: really jumping under the Biden administration, and it's on that
Speaker 1: upward trajectory, and we're going to wind up with a
Speaker 1: situation where we've got to pay four or five times
Speaker 1: sort you're paying now on a monthly utility bill. If
Speaker 1: it's not a budget issue for you, it will be.
Speaker 1: But what he says is, why don't we just do
Speaker 1: something to lower that cost. What would that something be.
Speaker 1: It'd be about getting rid of the mandated transfer of
Speaker 1: wealth from the mass of us to the few who
Speaker 1: are running these projects. It'd be getting rid of the regulations.
Speaker 1: It'd be getting rid of the climate pronouns. That's what
Speaker 1: we're talking about, the climate pronouns. So here's an idea.
Speaker 1: What if we simply bring down the cost of electricity?
Speaker 1: If we want to get crazy, then Uncle Sam could
Speaker 1: take some of the big money he throws at wind
Speaker 1: and solar and invest in something like natural gas, which
Speaker 1: is cheap, or maybe put a few chips on nuclear,
Speaker 1: he says, which is safer and cleaner than you might think. Well,
Speaker 1: I remain unconvinced about that. But here's what they're going
Speaker 1: to do with nuclear. They're going to build nuclear and
Speaker 1: probably have Sam Altman goes to Washington. You'll probably get
Speaker 1: Washington to pay for his own personal nuclear reactors. But
Speaker 1: they're not going to put that power out on the grid.
Speaker 1: When Microsoft opens up Three Mile Island, they're going to
Speaker 1: take every bit of that out, but none of it's
Speaker 1: going to go on the grid for you. Instead on
Speaker 1: the what we'll get is incredibly expensive and unreliable power.
Speaker 1: While our overlords are technocrat overlords because they are allied
Speaker 1: with what the government wants in terms of surveillance, propaganda,
Speaker 1: and censorship. They will get unlimited amounts of nuclear energy
Speaker 1: and they really don't care if it's safe or clean.
Speaker 1: They have absolutely no incentive to make it safer clean.
Speaker 1: So guess what's going to happen if you have no incentive.
Speaker 1: If they're going to sweep aside the regulations, as the
Speaker 1: governor of Pennsylvania is already talking about three mile houran
Speaker 1: Josh Shapiro, will sweep this away. We're going to do
Speaker 1: it at warp speed right. Well, that means they're getting
Speaker 1: rid of all safety concerns and they don't care as
Speaker 1: long as they've got artificial intelligence to spy on us.
Speaker 1: I mean, the AI and the computers can probably still
Speaker 1: keep working if the radiation gets really bad. They don't care,
Speaker 1: I mean, no incentives whatsoever. But you talk about crazy
Speaker 1: Uncle Sam, I think we need to replace Uncle Sam
Speaker 1: with Uncle Fester from the Adams family. You know, that's
Speaker 1: the way I view the federal governments. Crazy idiots and
Speaker 1: they think that they can light up the world of
Speaker 1: the light bulb in their mouth. That's what we're looking
Speaker 1: at now. It's the government mandates that are artificially driving
Speaker 1: the price up. It's the government mandates that are designed
Speaker 1: to rob us so we own nothing and that everything
Speaker 1: is transferred to the technocratic elite. But he says, imagine
Speaker 1: if a presidential candidate stood up and said, hey, folks,
Speaker 1: here's what we're going to do, we're going to put
Speaker 1: a couple of hundred bucks in everybody's pocket every month
Speaker 1: now forever by lowering energy prices. Instead, what they're doing
Speaker 1: is just the opposite. Hey, folks, here's what we're going
Speaker 1: to do. We're going to take several hundred dollars per
Speaker 1: month out of your pocket, and we're going to do
Speaker 1: that forever. Yeah, that's the reality of what is being
Speaker 1: promised us, or I should say threatened to us. So
Speaker 1: when you look at what is happening in Great Britain,
Speaker 1: civil war is breaking out between the green within the
Speaker 1: Green blob, but don't expect the BBC to report on it.
Speaker 1: So you've got different groups in the UK. They realize
Speaker 1: that this is not sustainable. And even though these vested
Speaker 1: interests in you know this, this they call it, the
Speaker 1: green Blob, has given six hundred and fifty thousand dollars
Speaker 1: to The Guardian over the last three years and what
Speaker 1: they get for that is shameless shilling about all of
Speaker 1: the climate mcguffin. They said, So, now you've got this
Speaker 1: idea that they're pushing since it's it's clear that there's
Speaker 1: no reliability in the power generation methods that they've been using.
Speaker 1: Now what the UK government is going to do so
Speaker 1: going to waste twenty two billion pounds capturing carbon dioxide
Speaker 1: and bearing it underground. And this is being pushed in
Speaker 1: the US by people who support Trump, by the North
Speaker 1: and South Dakota governors Bergham and Christinome, and they met
Speaker 1: at mar Lago with Trump and the guy who wants
Speaker 1: to run this transcontinental pipeline to pump the magic mystery
Speaker 1: unicorn farts into the ground. And so we got the
Speaker 1: same type of thing happening here. That's what you can
Speaker 1: expect if Trump gets sent you know, La La and
Speaker 1: Biden are just going to be banning everything and shutting
Speaker 1: everything down. They're going to come up with this ridiculous
Speaker 1: carbon capture scheme, and the leftist press will love it
Speaker 1: anything like that that transfers money and power, and the
Speaker 1: conservative press will just shut down and be quiet because
Speaker 1: it's Trump doing it well. This person says it's going
Speaker 1: to require enormous amounts of energy to capture and to
Speaker 1: compress gas, which is also likely to eventually seep out
Speaker 1: of any nearby cavernous hole in the ground. The whole
Speaker 1: exercise bears some similarity, and he refers to a sitcom
Speaker 1: in the nineteen seventies in the UK called Porridge, where
Speaker 1: he had prison officer McKay so as the prisoners had
Speaker 1: hidden the earth from an escape tunnel by digging another
Speaker 1: hole to put it in to make this guy the
Speaker 1: head of the La LA Energy Department, and he says,
Speaker 1: in geological terms, he said, think about something that could
Speaker 1: go wrong with this. He said, for example, passing mass pumping,
Speaker 1: passing massive amounts of gas, Pumping massive quantities of pressurized
Speaker 1: gas into the substrata may come with some risks. On
Speaker 1: August the twenty first, nineteen eighty six, there was a
Speaker 1: sudden release of one point six million tons of magmatic
Speaker 1: CO two from the bed of Lake Nios in Cameroon.
Speaker 1: It was since it's heavier than air, the CO two
Speaker 1: fell on the surrounding villages and suffocated seventeen hundred and
Speaker 1: forty six people. The gas had accumulated under high pressure
Speaker 1: and could have been released by volcanic activity or a
Speaker 1: minor earth trimmer. So there it kind of just happened
Speaker 1: as a freak accident of nature. Here. We're going to
Speaker 1: spend give a lot of money to friends of Trump
Speaker 1: and Biden and Harris to do that for us. And
Speaker 1: when you start pumping this stuff in, it's similar to
Speaker 1: the concerns about fracking and other things like that. When
Speaker 1: you start pushing it in, it can have some geological
Speaker 1: issues that we've already seen. The suggested threat from earthquakes
Speaker 1: was enough to ban off shore fracking in the UK.
Speaker 1: It'll be interesting to see if similar concerns arise and
Speaker 1: many millions of tons of pressurized CO two are going
Speaker 1: to be pumped into the ground. And so he talks
Speaker 1: about how one then we got hydrogen, and so there's
Speaker 1: all these different you know, all all of these different
Speaker 1: parties within the Green Blob are starting to fight over
Speaker 1: what kind of energy they're gonna have. But the reality
Speaker 1: is that they don't want them to be any energy,
Speaker 1: and they don't want them to be any people. This
Speaker 1: is all fundamentally about de industrialization as a pathway to depopulation.
Speaker 1: So they say that this is nothing but a and
Speaker 1: this is a true Potemkin village of fake science, fudged
Speaker 1: weather figures and ridiculous computer model attributions and predictions. That's
Speaker 1: precisely what this is. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 1: break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 8: W W.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: What is happening in North KOREAAN in terms of persecution?
Speaker 1: You know, North Korea persecutes Christians more than any other country,
Speaker 1: more than Communist China, more than Islamic countries. It is
Speaker 1: the number one persecutor of Christians, so bad that they
Speaker 1: can't get Bibles in except by parachutes, and the people
Speaker 1: who pick them up are frequently captured executed. Christians Solidarity
Speaker 1: Worldwide talks about it being the worst place for Christians.
Speaker 1: He's even worse. The current Kim is even worse than
Speaker 1: his father was. It intensified after that. Even under his father,
Speaker 1: they had factories that were on the border with North
Speaker 1: and South Korea, and North Koreans were able to come
Speaker 1: and work there and get a wage. But then that
Speaker 1: kind of stuff shut down because Kim Jong un wanted
Speaker 1: to show his power and he was very concerned of
Speaker 1: any kind of free speech, free expression, free exercise of religion.
Speaker 1: Sounds very much like our current crop of politicians, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: Don't you dare criticize me? Lala says that Elon must
Speaker 1: needs to have his privileges revoked. Trump says ABC News
Speaker 1: needs to have his license revote. Hillary Clinton admits that
Speaker 1: they are controlling the narrative and they've got to keep
Speaker 1: control of that. So they said that they gave an
Speaker 1: example of two high school students who are sentenced to
Speaker 1: hard labor for simply watching TV shows. But Christian groups
Speaker 1: and other people in the country that practice even a
Speaker 1: traditional Korean religion are being executed and sent to jail.
Speaker 1: And the reason for that is because they want to
Speaker 1: push forward government as a religion, they deify the Kims.
Speaker 1: They said. Christian missionaries take extremists to reach North Koreans.
Speaker 1: It's common for the first people in the outside world.
Speaker 1: For North Koreans to have any contact with are Christians
Speaker 1: because they're pushing in there. Why why, for the same
Speaker 1: reason that people are bringing supplies to North Carolina. It's
Speaker 1: even something that's even more concerning for Christians. They understand
Speaker 1: that these people are perishing without them, and so this
Speaker 1: is a selfless act of concern for other people for
Speaker 1: their eternal situation. Christians are the ones who are telling them,
Speaker 1: you've been sold a lie. You're living in a hermit
Speaker 1: isolated kingdom, and this is what the real world is like.
Speaker 1: And so you know, that's the point. That's what we're
Speaker 1: all trying to do, isn't it. We're trying to send
Speaker 1: that same message here in North America that the Christian
Speaker 1: missionaries are taken to North Korea. You've been sold a lie.
Speaker 1: You're living a lie. You've been told by people like
Speaker 1: Milania and others that, hey, your career, you know, whether
Speaker 1: it is singer for what was her name, Stevie Nicks,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't even have to think about it out of it,
Speaker 1: so anyway, Stevie Nicks, Oh yeah, my career is so important.
Speaker 1: And I killed the baby. I've called the baby Sarah,
Speaker 1: and you know, just just giving herself a lie. You know,
Speaker 1: stay there, Sarah, Stay with me, Sarah for a little while.
Speaker 1: I know you're not in any pain. All the rest
Speaker 1: of this stuff. We can lie to ourselves in a
Speaker 1: lot of different ways. We can have politicians who lie
Speaker 1: to us. The point is is that we, especially as Christians,
Speaker 1: Christians of all people, should be focused on telling people
Speaker 1: the truth, whether they want to hear it or not,
Speaker 1: whether it's comfortable or not. And you the truth is
Speaker 1: not comfortable. So the underground Christian church in North Korea
Speaker 1: has reportedly been growing and as seen as completely undermining
Speaker 1: the authority and the rule of the government. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 1: I always think about that quote from Star Wars. You know,
Speaker 1: she says, tighter you squeeze, and more we're gonna, you know,
Speaker 1: come through your fingers, that type of thing, And I
Speaker 1: think about that frequently. I'm paraphrasing it, but that really
Speaker 1: is a way that Christianity is. You can't stop it.
Speaker 1: The tighter they squeeze, the more it grows. One of
Speaker 1: the more interesting elements, Simpson said, surrounds the discussion over
Speaker 1: beliefs that Kim and other North Korean leaders are deities
Speaker 1: or at the very least elevated to such a place
Speaker 1: of personality cult where citizens are essentially forced into worshiping
Speaker 1: these governmental figures. There's a complete dehumanization of the people there,
Speaker 1: and we can't look away from the people, from their humanity,
Speaker 1: from their suffering. That's why they go well when we
Speaker 1: look at the kind of persecution that is coming for
Speaker 1: us now. Even this is an article that was on
Speaker 1: a Catholic site Crisis magazine talking about how the Catholic
Speaker 1: Church in the parishes of San Diego is saying they
Speaker 1: don't want homeschoolers using their buildings in off hours. Even
Speaker 1: they can open it up for everything else, they can
Speaker 1: open it up for a drag Queen storytime hour, whatever,
Speaker 1: but they don't want the Christians there in their own building.
Speaker 1: And that's why the Catholic conservatives there, the Catholic homeschoolers
Speaker 1: are absolutely astounded at what is happening with that. But
Speaker 1: that is what we're going to continue to see over
Speaker 1: and over again. But let's just take a look at
Speaker 1: Milania as we talk about the lies that are being
Speaker 1: sold to people. Milania is now championing abortion, as I
Speaker 1: mentioned briefly on Friday, as a fundamental right she sounds
Speaker 1: exactly like planned parenthood. It's absolutely amazing.
Speaker 9: Individual freedom is a fundamental principle that I safeguard without
Speaker 9: a doubt. There is no room for compromise when it
Speaker 9: comes to this essential right that all women possess from birth.
Speaker 1: Individuals if they make it to birth. What does my body,
Speaker 1: my choice really mean? Yeah? What does it mean in
Speaker 1: light of what your husband did in twenty twenty when
Speaker 1: he paid people to take away people's choices about their
Speaker 1: health care and other things? What does my body, my
Speaker 1: choice mean? This is these people just need to shut up.
Speaker 1: We've seen through the fraud of this, even if we
Speaker 1: don't have any GP politicians that will call them out
Speaker 1: on it, because the GP politicians were just as guilty
Speaker 1: of taking away your choice is about your body in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty as the Democrats were, So they're not going
Speaker 1: to talk about that. We need to talk about that.
Speaker 1: We need to have that talk because the GOP is
Speaker 1: remaining silent about that, and that really was your body.
Speaker 1: We're talking about abortion, we're talking about some body else.
Speaker 1: Different DNA and every one of these cases different DNA
Speaker 1: than the mother, and half of the cases a different
Speaker 1: sex than the mother, and on and on. It is
Speaker 1: a person, and yeah, she says, your rights from birth.
Speaker 1: So prior to birth, you don't have rights, is that right?
Speaker 2: See?
Speaker 1: The problem is is that Republicans should be showing people
Speaker 1: what an abortion is. Republicans should be showing people what
Speaker 1: a baby is, but they avoid that like the plague.
Speaker 1: Millennia goes on to claim that abortion is fundamental necessity
Speaker 1: must be completely normalized, and she's unapologetic about it. She says,
Speaker 1: our next generation must be provided with knowledge, security, safety
Speaker 1: and solace, and the cultural stigma associated with abortion must
Speaker 1: be lifted. Yeah, we should celebrate it, she says this. Well,
Speaker 1: you're seeing there are Trump family values, no doubt about it.
Speaker 1: They want to remove the stigma. That's why they won't
Speaker 1: show the baby. More evidence that the Trump family was
Speaker 1: never pro life. Trump honored his deal, says his life
Speaker 1: site News. Trump honored his deal with a pro life
Speaker 1: movement in twenty sixteen. But it is also true that
Speaker 1: Eric Trump told the press during the RNC that his
Speaker 1: father had always remained in favor of abortion. His wife,
Speaker 1: Laura said, who is current co chair of the RNC,
Speaker 1: is also firmly in the pro abortion camp. That's absolutely right.
Speaker 1: Trump is beyond liberal folks. He is in the same
Speaker 1: league as his paler Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. And
Speaker 1: so this is on a vaccine impact or health impact
Speaker 1: news Brian shall Holby. He says, Trump's Epstein provided wife,
Speaker 1: and he got Malania from Jeffrey Epstein. When what else
Speaker 1: he picked up in terms of that it's actually transmitted diseases.
Speaker 1: Milania releases the creepy video supporting full abortion rights. I
Speaker 1: just played for you. She is now to such an
Speaker 1: extent that you got some Democrat commentator says she trying
Speaker 1: to subvert Trump. I mean, here she is just before
Speaker 1: the election, and she's pushing her pornography. That she's proud
Speaker 1: of her pornography, her personal pornography. She's proud of abortion.
Speaker 1: She's holding that up as the key thing to be
Speaker 1: an American is to have an abortion. She is ignoring
Speaker 1: the source of autism and all the rest of the stuff,
Speaker 1: one thing after the other. And so you know, she
Speaker 1: doesn't say anything about vaccines, but only about bullying because
Speaker 1: that's part of the LGBT agenda. In an unexpected October surprise,
Speaker 1: Trump's current wife. I like that. That's his current wife
Speaker 1: who knows, maybe it'll be Laura lum Or after the
Speaker 1: election or something. I wouldn't want to do that before
Speaker 1: the election. That would definitely cost him the election. Sole
Speaker 1: choice to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, she says, rests with
Speaker 1: a mother that is carrying that child. But again, when
Speaker 1: you look at that picture there, I showed the pictures
Speaker 1: on Friday that you see Milania cozying up to Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein and to uh, you know, Glaine, right, and as
Speaker 1: he points out the you know, I think he over
Speaker 1: exaggerates it there with the eye and the dark you
Speaker 1: know photograph that's there. But I mean, you look at
Speaker 1: the rest of the stuff, hanging out out with p
Speaker 1: Diddy and Jeffrey Epstein and all the rest of people.
Speaker 1: Why is it that Trump gets a pass on all
Speaker 1: this stuff. So this is a new revelation about Malania, Well,
Speaker 1: I don't think that it's anything that's new for those
Speaker 1: who look beyond just how the media has portrayed Malania
Speaker 1: since she was first Lady, this view should not be
Speaker 1: surprising at all because it's so called freedom to kill
Speaker 1: a baby whenever one wishes. It's just another way to
Speaker 1: promote free sex and sex trafficking. And that's why I said,
Speaker 1: when you look at these pictures of her, and I
Speaker 1: mean the picture is not the pornography, but when you
Speaker 1: look at the pictures of her standing with Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: and stuff, it's pretty clear that she's a call girl,
Speaker 1: that she's for sale, and of course she has sold
Speaker 1: herself in multiple ways. She wants a quarter of a
Speaker 1: million dollars to come on CNN and talk. We've established
Speaker 1: what Malania is. We're just haggling over the price, as
Speaker 1: they say. But she got like a quarter of a
Speaker 1: million dollars from the log Cabin, Republicans and so forth.
Speaker 1: But she was part of the Epstein network. He introduced
Speaker 1: her to Trump. In two thousand, Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince
Speaker 1: Andrew attended a celebrity tennis tournament at mar A Lango,
Speaker 1: where Trump and Prince Andrew took pictures together. Mar Lago
Speaker 1: would figure prominently as a place of socialization for Epstein
Speaker 1: and Maxwell, as well as a place where they recruited
Speaker 1: miners into their sexual blackmail and sex trafficking operations. Trump
Speaker 1: is also president in Epstein's contact book, with several numbers listed.
Speaker 1: Milania is also listed as one of the contracts. And
Speaker 1: this is coming from Whitney Webb's One Nation under Blackmail,
Speaker 1: because that's what this is all about. The Maxwell's, Robert
Speaker 1: Maxwell's daughter Glene. They were working with Israeli intelligence to
Speaker 1: set people up to blackmail them. Trump is right. There
Speaker 1: is the best friend of Jeffrey Epstein hanging around together
Speaker 1: in Florida and New York, always partying together until they
Speaker 1: got into a dispute over some property. So is Milania
Speaker 1: trying to sabotage Trump? Well, I guess not, because Trump
Speaker 1: is pitching his one hundred thousand dollars, watches his witch's book,
Speaker 1: Milania's book, and crypto and so right there along with
Speaker 1: those bibles, he's got her book about pornography and abortion.
Speaker 1: There's something for everybody, right, he can be all things
Speaker 1: to everyone, and nobody is any of the wiser. By
Speaker 1: the way, I think where she is headed is when
Speaker 1: you look at Milania, not Milania, Melinda Melinda Gates. I
Speaker 1: think Milania Trump is going to go down the path
Speaker 1: of Melinda Gates. Now, of course, Gates has always been
Speaker 1: openly supportive of planned parenthood. They did not differ on this.
Speaker 1: But now as the New York Times, it says Melinda
Speaker 1: Gates's new life is all about abortion politics and La
Speaker 1: La Harris and just wait for it. You're going to
Speaker 1: see the same type of thing with Milania Trump. You know,
Speaker 1: she is twenty four years younger than Donald Trump. Trump
Speaker 1: is seventy eight, she's fifty four, so she's going to
Speaker 1: be around for a long time after Trump. And we've
Speaker 1: already seen what her values are. Here if we look
Speaker 1: at Tim Waltz pushing the abortion narrative. This is from
Speaker 1: World Magazine. They were very concerned about what we saw
Speaker 1: on the vice presidential debate. They said, well, okay, jd
Speaker 1: Avance did a masterful job of deflection and everything, except
Speaker 1: when it came to defending life. You see, he's not
Speaker 1: going to be on her side with that as well.
Speaker 1: And had the one coherent moment of Waltz as he came
Speaker 1: in with a SoundBite talking about the death of Amber Thurman.
Speaker 1: He said, well, if you want to talk about the
Speaker 1: death of Amber Thurmon, it's not about the fact that
Speaker 1: she couldn't get an abortion, but it's about the danger
Speaker 1: of chemical abortions. That's really the narrative. But again they
Speaker 1: get into this situation. Jd van Stays because they show
Speaker 1: that they are not willing to defend human life. And
Speaker 1: Waltz hypocritically cites Jesus's call to care for the least
Speaker 1: of us as he's legalizing abortion up until birth and
Speaker 1: then legalizing in fantasize. As I said from the very beginning,
Speaker 1: when he got a point, I said, they had eight
Speaker 1: children that survived an abortion that they killed. Just set
Speaker 1: them over on the side, give them no health care
Speaker 1: at all. You ripped limbs off of them, You scald
Speaker 1: him whatever. You're not going to help the call that
Speaker 1: comfort care. And what Tim Waltz did was he made
Speaker 1: that legal to do other than but he stopped the
Speaker 1: reporting of it in a key way. But he says,
Speaker 1: I don't talk about my faith a lot. Yeah, it
Speaker 1: might be a good reason for that. Maybe he needs to. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he says, as you did it to one of these
Speaker 1: my least brethren, you did it to me. Does that
Speaker 1: mean the abortion? Yeah? You know, Christ really was wounded
Speaker 1: for our transgressions. If you have had an abortion, whether
Speaker 1: you were deceived about it, you're guilty about it, or
Speaker 1: whether you made that decision. Jesus was wounded for our transgressions.
Speaker 1: He paid for our sins, and he can remove that.
Speaker 1: As far as the east is from the west, there's forgiveness.
Speaker 1: That's what Tim Waltz needs to be telling people. But
Speaker 1: instead he's using his his faith, whatever that is, to
Speaker 1: promote the murder of innocent babies, and we really shouldn't
Speaker 1: tolerate that. As governor, he signed a law codifying so
Speaker 1: called right to kill a baby up to birth, to
Speaker 1: stop the reporting of it, and to mutilate children. Maybe
Speaker 1: you need to read that part about those of you
Speaker 1: who harm these little ones and be better if you
Speaker 1: had a millstone put in your neck and you were
Speaker 1: thrown into the ocean. People who he is attacking not
Speaker 1: only the body, but the soul of these children with
Speaker 1: what he is pushing out there. And he and the
Speaker 1: establishment don't want to hear. The American Academy of Pediatrics
Speaker 1: I had their annual convention in Orlando and their conference,
Speaker 1: and they had a lot of people who showed up
Speaker 1: to the American Academy of Pediatrics conference to talk about
Speaker 1: being detransitioners. They said, we were harmed by this when
Speaker 1: we were younger, we were deceived by this, and the
Speaker 1: pediatricians threw them out I don't want to hear that.
Speaker 1: They came to warn people about the physical harm, about
Speaker 1: the mutilization, the sterilization, the suffering that they had gone
Speaker 1: through with these operations, and the pediatricians didn't want that.
Speaker 1: Sixty seven thousand pediatricians are part of this organization, and
Speaker 1: they reaffirmed their support for child mutilation treatments, puberty blockers,
Speaker 1: cross sex hormones, and genital surgery. The people like La La,
Speaker 1: the people like Millenia and Donald and the whole lot
Speaker 1: of them are out. They're attacking the body, the spirit,
Speaker 1: and the soul of these children, not just with abortion,
Speaker 1: but with everything that they do, the mutilation and the
Speaker 1: rest of it. Yeah, that's your choice, right, you're to
Speaker 1: Which evil are you going to pick? I'm not picking
Speaker 1: either one of them.
Speaker 5: David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If
Speaker 5: you've been exposed to logic by listening to the David
Speaker 5: Night Show, please do your part and try not to
Speaker 5: spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the
Speaker 5: show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father people have
Speaker 5: to trust me, I mean, trust the science. Wear you mask,
Speaker 5: take your vaccine, don't ask questions
Speaker 2: Using free speech to free minds, it's the David knight Show.