Speaker 1: Well, as I said before, Jade Helm, you know we
Speaker 1: this is from the interset and they said conservatives were
Speaker 1: once panicked about a federal plot to invade their communities
Speaker 1: and quashed assent, and now they're cheering it. Of course,
Speaker 1: I got my attention. This is on the Intercept and
Speaker 1: it was something that was linked by the Drudge Report,
Speaker 1: and I remember when that happened, and my take on
Speaker 1: it at the time was that I thought that they
Speaker 1: were using info Wars to push this out. Mcgraven, who
Speaker 1: was head of Special Forces at the time, Admiral mccraven,
Speaker 1: had said, we need to get back to our psyop
Speaker 1: roots and special forces. We see all these movies about
Speaker 1: people jumping out of planes and all these kinetic things
Speaker 1: and stuff like that, because we really started was with
Speaker 1: special forces and syops that basically go into an area
Speaker 1: that the US is going to start a war with
Speaker 1: or invade, and they would plant stories there and see
Speaker 1: how people reacted to them so they can identify who
Speaker 1: was going to be their ally and who was going
Speaker 1: to be their friend. And I believed that that was
Speaker 1: the purpose of jay Nown from the very beginning, and
Speaker 1: I think that they used in for wars for that purpose.
Speaker 1: But let's go back and see from the perspective of
Speaker 1: the left, because that's where the interceptor is coming from.
Speaker 1: Talk of troops in American cities, federal shock troops brutalizing
Speaker 1: citizens and neighbors, the targeting of gun owners, mass surveillance,
Speaker 1: the deployment of militarized artificial intelligence, and the suspension of
Speaker 1: the constitution. By the way, folks, you are here, this
Speaker 1: is where it is. There is twenty fifteen and twenty
Speaker 1: and fifteen. The far right was incensed, they said, But
Speaker 1: now the far right embraces this because it's Trump. It
Speaker 1: was bad because it was Obama. But if Trump is
Speaker 1: going to bring in military martial law and take over
Speaker 1: the cities, that's just fine. Isn't it amazing how these
Speaker 1: people can't extrapolate even when they've experienced Obama, when they've
Speaker 1: experienced Biden and a j six persecutions, they still can't
Speaker 1: get it. It's incredible. It was also a time of
Speaker 1: post Snowden horror, as the nation realized that it was
Speaker 1: living inside an unfathomably immense government surveillance dragnet, endorsed and
Speaker 1: expanded by both political parties. They're absolutely right, It was
Speaker 1: a moment that for a certain segment of conservatives, jade
Speaker 1: Helm fifteen became an American crisis. And again it was
Speaker 1: our reporting as to what was happening with the drills
Speaker 1: and the cities, alongside with leaks from Snowden that I
Speaker 1: think was why they leaked this information, put out a
Speaker 1: false narrative through info wars in order to get to
Speaker 1: see how people are going to react, And of course
Speaker 1: that had a big effect in Texas. Greg Abbott got
Speaker 1: involved in it and a lot of people did. Reveals
Speaker 1: how much about the hucksters who pushed it and the
Speaker 1: tolerance of many Americans for state depression so long as
Speaker 1: they are not the intended targets. The cauldron of hatred,
Speaker 1: federal violence, and surveillance brewed by the paranoiax who pounced
Speaker 1: on jade Helm has spilled over today, not in the
Speaker 1: form of right wing phobia, but of right wing policy.
Speaker 1: Let me just say, if they're actually watching you, you're
Speaker 1: not paranoid, right How could they in one paragraph say
Speaker 1: look this is where we are today, this is actually happening,
Speaker 1: and in the other next paragraph they talk about paranoia
Speaker 1: of the right. It wasn't paranoia, It was understanding where
Speaker 1: these people were going. And I think even though Alex
Speaker 1: understands where they're going, he certainly does know what's going on.
Speaker 1: He is a huckster. In July twenty fifteen, Alex Jones,
Speaker 1: at that point, still little more than a punchline, they said,
Speaker 1: issued a die or warning on his website info wars.
Speaker 1: This is an ergency broadcast. He began to militarize the police,
Speaker 1: to put standing armies on the streets, to suppress the population,
Speaker 1: and to carry out political operations. But now he celebrates it,
Speaker 1: doesn't he. Jones are referring to publicly released Pentagon planning
Speaker 1: documents detailing jade Helm fifteen military training exercise throughout sparsely
Speaker 1: populated swaths of the American South from Florida to Texas.
Speaker 1: As is often the case when the dishonest have primary
Speaker 1: documents in a vast megaphone, Jones mistated nearly every detail
Speaker 1: of the materials, and that is true. He hyped it.
Speaker 1: It was good for business. A map from what was
Speaker 1: essentially a large scale military role playing game labeling Texas
Speaker 1: as hostile colored in red, was irrefutable evidence to Jones
Speaker 1: that the Obama administration was prepared to let loose a
Speaker 1: national security state on the conservative heartland. Well, prior to this,
Speaker 1: we had reported over and over again about the military
Speaker 1: exercises that were being done in cities like Chicago and
Speaker 1: LA and other places like that, and they said, well,
Speaker 1: when question about it, they said, you train where you're
Speaker 1: going to fight.
Speaker 2: It's like, what's that about.
Speaker 1: And then they talk about the fact that the Obama
Speaker 1: administration was putting M wraps and everywhere you know, small
Speaker 1: town sheriffs were getting them if they would be willing
Speaker 1: to take them. What they found out was that they
Speaker 1: were getting white elephants. These things were hastily put together
Speaker 1: for the war in Iraq, these mind resistant armored personnel
Speaker 1: carriers m wraps, and they were a nightmare of maintenance expenses.
Speaker 1: And so what they did was the Pentagon retained ownership
Speaker 1: of it, but gave it to some of these communities
Speaker 1: shares and stuff like that, so they could I just
Speaker 1: drive around in parades or something, and in part of
Speaker 1: the militarization of the police, letting them role play as
Speaker 1: swat the teams and that type of thing. But they
Speaker 1: quickly found out that it was so expensive to maintain them,
Speaker 1: and they had to be maintained by the local people.
Speaker 1: A lot of them gave them back. But as I
Speaker 1: pointed out of the time, why were they doing that,
Speaker 1: What is the motivation for that? Well, one possible motivation
Speaker 1: would be I give this these people, they maintain it,
Speaker 1: and of course it trains them to think of themselves
Speaker 1: as military. The other thing is that if they decided
Speaker 1: that they were going to actually run something out like
Speaker 1: Trump is doing now, these things are still under the control,
Speaker 1: still owned by the Pentagon, and if they've been maintained
Speaker 1: as they were required to maintain them, then they're already
Speaker 1: there preplaced. Then they have to move them around the country.
Speaker 1: They very pre deployed them, and it was a very
Speaker 1: strange change in the Obama administration. It was newsworthy, whether
Speaker 1: or not the interception thought so. It was newsworthy because
Speaker 1: prior to that, since World War Two, surplus military equipment
Speaker 1: had always been given and I mean given, transferred over
Speaker 1: with no charge and that type of thing to rural
Speaker 1: fire departments. They pointed out that the rural fire departments
Speaker 1: are the front line on these large force fires that'll
Speaker 1: happen in natural areas, national parks and things like that.
Speaker 1: So You've got small rural fire departments that have to
Speaker 1: deal with the biggest fires, so it made sense to
Speaker 1: give them some equipment to help them to do that,
Speaker 1: especially if it was surplus equipment that the military didn't
Speaker 1: really want to use anymore because maybe it was outdated
Speaker 1: and vulnerable. They stopped that program so they could start
Speaker 1: putting this equipment in with police departments and sheriff's departments,
Speaker 1: and so you had a lot of volunteer firemen immediately
Speaker 1: start writing letters. Are very politically involved, they're active, they're volunteers,
Speaker 1: and they got senators and several states to push back
Speaker 1: right away, and they stopped that policy right away from Obama.
Speaker 1: But it said something about what their motives were, and
Speaker 1: I thought were very important. So that was really the
Speaker 1: full context the military drills that happened over and over
Speaker 1: again in large cities, especially Democrat cities, and the fact
Speaker 1: that they had the deployment of these things, and then
Speaker 1: also there was the asymmetric warfare aspect of it. That's
Speaker 1: why I went to Fort ap Hill Whigs Sorry, go ahead.
Speaker 2: And Lance.
Speaker 3: It's interesting to see the parallels between the double think
Speaker 3: of the left and the double think of the right
Speaker 3: because you know, like you pointed out, they're pointing out
Speaker 3: they're saying they're paranoiacs if they believed this stuff, which
Speaker 3: is now coming true. And they have to say that
Speaker 3: it was just a map that was colored red. And
Speaker 3: ignore all the stuff about the Fort ap Hill with
Speaker 3: the corner of First in Maine and churches and all
Speaker 3: that that's set up for the military to train in.
Speaker 3: That doesn't anything like the Middle.
Speaker 2: East, that's right, that's right.
Speaker 1: And it hasn't been attacked by planes, not bombed out
Speaker 1: shells of buildings.
Speaker 2: No, they were actually there by doing these drills.
Speaker 3: Well, left has to say, no, it was ridiculous ten
Speaker 3: years ago, but it's real now, and the right has
Speaker 3: to say, no, it's nothing now, but it was a
Speaker 3: real threat ten years ago.
Speaker 2: That's right. That's right.
Speaker 1: So the White House was leveraging the national security state
Speaker 1: to build the infrastructure for a federal paramilitary occupation of
Speaker 1: the country to choke out political dissent by force.
Speaker 2: That's what's happening.
Speaker 1: Unwanted portions of my places would be herded into Department
Speaker 1: of Homeland Security administered campuses, and warned Jones, other stalwarts
Speaker 1: of the right wing paranoia We're not becoming a police state,
Speaker 1: he told viewers were already here. Well, you know they're
Speaker 1: spending tens of millions of dollars to get massive warehouses
Speaker 1: to put people in. Is going to be illegal immigrants?
Speaker 1: I mean, are they only attacking, arresting, ramming, shooting illegal immigrants. No,
Speaker 1: they're doing that to American citizens. Now will incarceration, mass
Speaker 1: incarceration be the next thing?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 1: Maybe, all right, So Jones claim the training exercise was
Speaker 1: connected to the broader militarization of the American police agencies,
Speaker 1: a real trend that he misconstrued as a leftist scheme
Speaker 1: against his audience was they pointed out at the very beginning,
Speaker 1: they said, this is something has been done by both
Speaker 1: the left and the right. And when you superimpose your
Speaker 1: partisan paranoia, or your partisan bias, or your your marketing,
Speaker 1: your partisan marketing over this, what does is it discredits it,
Speaker 1: doesn't it?
Speaker 2: He said?
Speaker 1: You got massive military gear being cased, armored vehicles, machine guns, helicopters,
Speaker 1: night vision humbies with the police departments around the country.
Speaker 1: He said, But now, good Jones was not alone. Texas
Speaker 1: Governor Greg Abbott quickly endorsed in for wars Ravings, deploying
Speaker 1: the State Guard to monitor jade Helm so Texans know
Speaker 1: their safety and their constitutional rights, private property rights, and
Speaker 1: civil liberties will not be infringed. As he put it
Speaker 1: in an April twenty fifteen letter ordering their mobilization.
Speaker 4: This is a momazing.
Speaker 2: They call it ravings.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, yeah, yeah, ravings right. So, Former Texas Congressman
Speaker 1: Louis Gomert suggested that the White House is hoping to
Speaker 1: provoke an armed confrontation between the military and the administration's critics.
Speaker 1: There's no surprise, said Gombert, that those who have experienced
Speaker 1: or noticed such persecution are legitimately suspicious. I understand the
Speaker 1: reason for concern and uncertainty, agreed Senator Ted Cruz. So
Speaker 1: when you look at all this, folks, this tells you
Speaker 1: the importance of partisan political parties.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: It blinds people to what is happening. The left was
Speaker 1: blinded to it then, the right is blinded to it now.
Speaker 1: The reality is it was happening then, and it's happening now,
Speaker 1: and it's further along, and this is the agenda. Locals
Speaker 1: organized jade Helm volunteer groups that monitored and recorded military movement.
Speaker 1: Oath keepers describe jade Helm on its website as a
Speaker 1: quote portentious government plan, a prefabricated, preconstructed umbrella under which
Speaker 1: a black op by the Deep State's compartmentalized agencies could
Speaker 1: possibly go live in a fantastic sort of chakanaw false
Speaker 1: flag psycho coup to jar the public mind of America
Speaker 1: through fear into acceptance of some nefarious policy, you know,
Speaker 1: like Operation Warp Speed, which they just set that out.
Speaker 1: So changing the mind of America through fear into the
Speaker 1: acceptance of some nefarious policy the government desired, such as
Speaker 1: establishment of martial law, complete loss of individual liberty and
Speaker 1: our constitution. Oh that was twenty twenty. Now today he's
Speaker 1: taking it to the next step, isn't he. And so
Speaker 1: I always felt the purpose of this was a syop.
Speaker 1: As I said, I felt this was to essentially inoculate
Speaker 1: them from any criticism about it. Oh yeah, they criticized that,
Speaker 1: But see what Jade Helm, nothing happened. And so I
Speaker 1: always believe that was what was going on. Largely unconcerned
Speaker 1: and frequently unconstrained by law. Trump has found in his
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security. What Jones warned was coming a
Speaker 1: decade ago, a paramilitary force to terrorize political opponents and
Speaker 1: demographic undesirables. That's right, and it was all about identification
Speaker 1: of people in different groups. Trump and a docile American
Speaker 1: right wing have finally delivered the jade Helm presidency. You've
Speaker 1: now got armored personnel carriers today carrying masked, heavily armed,
Speaker 1: pointlessly camouflaged. That's the thing I said the other day,
Speaker 1: I said, these guys are all wearing camouflage like they're
Speaker 1: in the jungle. That doesn't help you in the city,
Speaker 1: does it. It actually makes you stand out. And I
Speaker 1: guess that's the point. You know, this is kind of
Speaker 1: Christynome level role playing when you wear camouflage in the cities.
Speaker 1: So federal commandos going through American cities that voted against
Speaker 1: the president, and it's backed by a sophisticated national surveillance apparatus.
Speaker 1: Trump and his lieutenants, beneficiaries of American right wing, reshaped
Speaker 1: by the likes of Jones and his audience, make real
Speaker 1: explicit quiet fantasizing attributed to Obama during jade Helm, speaking
Speaker 1: openly of American communities as hives of the enemy. In September,
Speaker 1: Trump announced impending deportation operations in Chicago with a doctored
Speaker 1: image depicting the city under attack with may palm. You
Speaker 1: remember that. That's the most amazing thing to me. I
Speaker 1: took that meme and expanded it.
Speaker 2: I said, places, and we're going to straighten that one.
Speaker 2: By what they're saying.
Speaker 1: You're trying to take over the Republic and this is
Speaker 1: going to be a major part for some of the
Speaker 1: people in this room. That's a war too, It's a
Speaker 1: war from within.
Speaker 2: I told Pete, we.
Speaker 1: Should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds
Speaker 1: for our military, and that's going to be their military
Speaker 1: robots what and I did that. Before I did it,
Speaker 1: a human robot did that to a woman who was
Speaker 1: talking to him, pulled down his pepper gun pepper balt gun,
Speaker 1: and pulled out a real pistol and stuck it right
Speaker 1: in her face, just like that robot, except this is
Speaker 1: a flesh and blood robot. Yeah, that's Trump's name right there,
Speaker 1: Chicago burning in the background. He's dressed like the character
Speaker 1: from Apocalypse Now with the helicopters. What Trump didn't do
Speaker 1: and his meme was have himself holding the Constitution lighting
Speaker 1: it from below, which is really what is happening here, folks. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so say that you're going to attack napalm Chicago. By napalm,
Speaker 1: Chicago is going to find out why it's been why
Speaker 1: it is called the Department of War, said Trump in
Speaker 1: his tweet. Imagine if Obama had done that. Just imagine.
Speaker 1: And yet these same people who would have been rightfully
Speaker 1: outraged if Obama had said that, don't care at all
Speaker 1: when it's Trump who is saying that.
Speaker 2: And so.
Speaker 1: Was this paranoia or was it something that was rolling
Speaker 1: out that we just reported. You know, we're look at trends,
Speaker 1: and like Gerald Sluinty says, you don't try to predict
Speaker 1: exactly when it's going to happen. It's it's important to
Speaker 1: get an idea of when it's going to happen. But
Speaker 1: you can identify this trend and be correct about that
Speaker 1: without knowing exactly when the hammer is going to fall
Speaker 1: or when the market is going to fall. There was
Speaker 1: a Pentagon video that was done back in twenty fifteen,
Speaker 1: I think, and this is also something that's picked up
Speaker 1: by the Intercept of the time. Listen to the Pentagon's
Speaker 1: vision of megacities in the future in twenty thirty. Of
Speaker 1: course that's the date that they want to have all
Speaker 1: this stuff put in and I've been saying that, you know,
Speaker 1: even though we don't know the exact timing, they've been
Speaker 1: saying that is their goal. You know, you don't have
Speaker 1: a goal if you don't set a date for it, right,
Speaker 1: you have a wish. Well, they've got a goal. They
Speaker 1: have set the date of twenty thirty. That's when they
Speaker 1: want to roll this stuff out or have it in place.
Speaker 1: And we're rapidly moving toward that. If you think about it,
Speaker 1: we got another four years. What could happen another four years?
Speaker 1: Look at what's happened in just the last few months.
Speaker 1: You know, there are some decades where nothing happens, and
Speaker 1: then there's some months where decades happen. Ere aren't there.
Speaker 4: The future is urban. By twenty thirty, urban areas are
Speaker 4: expected to grow by one point four billion, with that
Speaker 4: growth occurring almost entirely in the developing world. Cities will
Speaker 4: account for sixty percent of the world's population and seventy
Speaker 4: percent of the world's GDP. The urban environment will be
Speaker 4: the locusts where drivers of instability will converge. It is
Speaker 4: the domain that by the year twenty thirty, sixty percent
Speaker 4: of urban dwellers will be under the age of eighteen.
Speaker 4: The cities that grow the fastest will be the most
Speaker 4: challenged as resources become constrained and illicit networks fill the
Speaker 4: gap left by overextended and undercapitalized governments. The risk of
Speaker 4: natural disasters, compounded by geography, climate changes, unregulated growth, and
Speaker 4: substandard infrastructure inter sect to frustrate humanitarian relief. Growth will
Speaker 4: magnify the increasing separation between rich and poor. Religious and
Speaker 4: ethnic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because they're doing the great.
Speaker 4: Replacement precedented development as impoverishment, slums and shanty towns rapidly
Speaker 4: expand alongside modern high rises, technological advances, and ever increasing
Speaker 4: levels of prosperity. This is the world of our future.
Speaker 4: It is one we are not prepared to effectively operate within,
Speaker 4: and it is unavoidable. Megacities are complex systems where people
Speaker 4: and structures are compressed together in ways that defy both
Speaker 4: our understanding of city planning and military doctrine. It is
Speaker 4: an ecosystem that demands a highly agile and adaptive force
Speaker 4: to successfully operate within. Infrastructures will vary radically with concentrations
Speaker 4: of high tech transportation, globally connected air and seaports, contemporary
Speaker 4: water utilities and waste disposal intermixed with open landfills, overburdened sewers,
Speaker 4: polluted water, and makeshift power gridts. Living habit tats will
Speaker 4: extend from the high rise to the ground level cottage
Speaker 4: to subterranean labyrinths, each defined by its own social code
Speaker 4: and role of law. Social structures will be equally challenged,
Speaker 4: if not dysfunctional, as historic ways of life clashed with
Speaker 4: modern living. Ethnic and racial differences are forced to live together,
Speaker 4: and criminal networks offer opportunity for the growing mass of unemployed.
Speaker 4: This becomes the nervous system of non nation state unaligned
Speaker 4: individuals and organizations that live and work in the shadows
Speaker 4: of national rule. Where physical domains can be seen, Digital
Speaker 4: domains will have limitless potential to breed and expand without limit.
Speaker 4: Digital security and trade will be increasingly threatened by sophisticated,
Speaker 4: ilicit economies and decentralized syndicates of crime to give adversaries
Speaker 4: global reach at an unprecedented level. This will add to
Speaker 4: the complexities of human targeting as a proportionally smaller number
Speaker 4: of adversaries intermingled with larger and increasing number of citizens.
Speaker 4: The scale and density of these domains is daunting. In
Speaker 4: a city of ten million, where you hold the support
Speaker 4: of ninety nine percent of the population, the remaining one
Speaker 4: percent represents a threat of one hundred thousand. It is
Speaker 4: an environment of convergence. Hidden amongst the enormous scale and
Speaker 4: complexity of the megacity. These are the future breeding grounds,
Speaker 4: incubators and launching pads for adversaries and high bred threats
Speaker 4: linked globally. These are man made labyrinths that provide refuge
Speaker 4: and movement across the vast sections of these cities where
Speaker 4: alternate forms of governance have taken control. The advice of
Speaker 4: doctrine from Sansu to current field manuals has provided two
Speaker 4: fundamental options. Avoid the cities or establish a cordon to
Speaker 4: either wait out the adversary or drain the swamp of
Speaker 4: non combatants and engage the remaining adversaries in high intensity
Speaker 4: conflict within Even our counterinsurgency doctrine honed in the cities
Speaker 4: of Iraq in the mountains of Afghanistan is inadequate to
Speaker 4: address the sheer scale of population in the future urban
Speaker 4: reality from the streets of Achen to the Citadel and way.
Speaker 4: We have defeated adversaries who attempted to use urban terrain
Speaker 4: to their advantage. Oh inflict is written deep into the
Speaker 4: Army's histories, But in Tomorrow's conflict, these megacities are orders
Speaker 4: of magnitude, greater and complexity, and our current options do
Speaker 4: not meet strategic ends. Our future operations must allow us
Speaker 4: to rapidly return the city to the people. They will
Speaker 4: be too large and complex to isolate or court on
Speaker 4: in their entirety. Yet our soldiers will have to operate
Speaker 4: within these ecosystems with minimal disruption and flow. Our current
Speaker 4: and past strategies can no longer hold. We are facing
Speaker 4: environments that the masters of war never foresaw. We are
Speaker 4: facing a threat that requires us to redefine doctrine and
Speaker 4: the force and radically new in different ways. The future
Speaker 4: Army will confront a highly sophisticated urban centric threat that
Speaker 4: will require that urban operations become the core requirement for
Speaker 4: the future Landforce. The threat is clear, our direction remains
Speaker 4: to be defined. The future is urban, and again that
Speaker 4: was done by the intercept. But one thing really strikes
Speaker 4: me as I watch that and that is they're describing
Speaker 4: this yestopian third world hell that is essentially the outcome
Speaker 4: of current government policies in America as well as in Europe.
Speaker 4: They know exactly where they're going, and it is their
Speaker 4: policies that are driving us into this. They want that
Speaker 4: The only thing they're concerned about in this video is
Speaker 4: how do we maintain continuity of government? How do we
Speaker 4: maintain control after we create this third world dystopian hell.
Speaker 4: That is the amazing thing they talk about. Yeah, the
Speaker 4: makeshift power grids. I highlighted some of the keywords that
Speaker 4: are in this a sense, the underliging individuals and organizations
Speaker 4: that live in work in the shadows of national rule.
Speaker 4: This is about wiping out all choice and concentrating wealth
Speaker 4: in the hands of the few. They said, you know,
Speaker 4: you're gonna have little tiny shanty towns where people are
Speaker 4: building shacks in the street, living in the shadow of
Speaker 4: these amazing high rise, high tech things. Sounds like as that,
Speaker 4: doesn't it. They want to make the entire world like that,
Speaker 4: and so they want to overburdened sewers, polluted water, makeshift
Speaker 4: power grids. Like Trump is saying, Yeah, I told these
Speaker 4: companies that are coming in here do manufacturing. You need
Speaker 4: to set up your own power right there at the factory.
Speaker 4: Because a our power grid is old and it's falling
Speaker 4: apart and implied and all that is. We're not going
Speaker 4: to do anything to fix that. We're not going to
Speaker 4: do anything to incentivize people to fix it. I don't
Speaker 4: think it's a federal government's responsibility to set up the
Speaker 4: power grid. I think they need to get out of it.
Speaker 4: More things they get out of the better, because everything
Speaker 4: they get into they mess up. But they're not talking
Speaker 4: about incentivizing or helping or planning for a future that
Speaker 4: people want to live in. This is the dystopian third
Speaker 4: world hell that they're trying to do to everybody that
Speaker 4: is the other side of this Jade Helm militarize stuff
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty six, even to the extent that they
Speaker 4: talk about draining the swamp.
Speaker 1: Now this is about twelve years ago. Is anybody talking
Speaker 1: about draining the swamp? Was that a maga meme at
Speaker 1: that point in time?
Speaker 2: Drain the swamp? Drained the swamp? No, it's that interesting.
Speaker 1: You know, people who gave us Trump, who did all
Speaker 1: the rest of the stuff on their propagandists like Alex
Speaker 1: Jones drain the swamp. They see you as the swamp.
Speaker 1: They want to drain you. Drain you of power, of independence,
Speaker 1: of liberty, of financial independence. That's what they want to
Speaker 1: drain from you. And of course they're very concerned about
Speaker 1: the population. They get a city of ten million, if
Speaker 1: ninety nine percent of them are with you, that means
Speaker 1: there's one hundred thousand people there that are against you.
Speaker 1: We got to eliminate that. One of the ways that
Speaker 1: you need to do that is to reduce the population.
Speaker 1: Of course, that's always been a big part of this,
Speaker 1: that's always been a big part of all of this.
Speaker 2: Green McGuffey.
Speaker 1: And before we had the twenty thirty Smart Agenda and
Speaker 1: the Smart Cities, of course, we had Agenda twenty one.
Speaker 1: Sometime in the twenty first century. They were going to
Speaker 1: implement this, and then when they got to around twenty fifteen,
Speaker 1: they put a specific date on it, twenty thirty. But
Speaker 1: prior to that they put out their maps. You remember
Speaker 1: the old Agenda twenty one maps where it showed the
Speaker 1: areas that were off limits going to be off limits
Speaker 1: to humans, which basically most of the continental United States,
Speaker 1: and they would concentrate us in large megacities. For example,
Speaker 1: in Texas, they would take the corridor there that was Dallas, Austin,
Speaker 1: San Antonio and just make that into one gigantic city.
Speaker 1: Well it's basically getting there pretty quickly. And then of
Speaker 1: course it'd be another center over in Houston. So you
Speaker 1: just have to have a high speed rail line that's
Speaker 1: going to run between those. They've been planning this for
Speaker 1: a very long time, and it wasn't paranoia. I'm afraid
Speaker 1: afraid that they're doing exactly what they always said they
Speaker 1: were going to do. So they said after Minneapolis residents
Speaker 1: Renee Good and Alex Pretty were gunned down by DHS
Speaker 1: agents then cheared by Alex Jones one hundred percent, showing
Speaker 1: that ICE was justified and shooting Alex Pretty. That was
Speaker 1: a day after he puts that stuff up, and he
Speaker 1: had nothing that showed any justification whatsoever because it wasn't justified.
Speaker 1: He didn't have any new video, so says Trump's speech,
Speaker 1: DHS agents have shot twelve people, killing four of them.
Speaker 1: Minneapolis residents described the experience of ICE as something akin
Speaker 1: to a military occupation, where Obama's jade helm fell short.
Speaker 1: And the collective imaginations of the info wars right. Trump's
Speaker 1: second term has succeeded in wielding DHS as an ideological cudgel.
Speaker 1: So they have the killing of Good and Pretty. The
Speaker 1: department's justification for dispensing the death penalty on the sidewalk
Speaker 1: that they were both domestic terrorists bent on killing federal
Speaker 1: personnel quickly disintegrated in the face of video evidence. All
Speaker 1: that was left was a rationale that was more foreboding
Speaker 1: than anything that Jade Helm Truthers had attributed to the
Speaker 1: Obama administration, a shrug that boils down to the brutal view. Well,
Speaker 1: that's what they get. And for wanting this to stop, Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: You know they deserve that. You know, they want Somalis here,
Speaker 1: they deserve to die. I voted for this attitude that's
Speaker 1: out there. Okay, Boomer, you know that's what we see
Speaker 1: from these people. So Greg Bovino, I wondered if pretty
Speaker 1: about pretty at a press conference? Who said or was
Speaker 1: he there for a reason? As they point out, his
Speaker 1: reason for being there was clear and it was filmed
Speaker 1: for multiple angles. He was there to legally observe and
Speaker 1: record the agents who then killed him. For doing that
Speaker 1: in May twenty fifteen, and here's what they mentioned me
Speaker 1: in this article. Info Wars correspondent David Knight warned that
Speaker 1: Jade Holme would involve the collection and exploitation of enormous
Speaker 1: reams of personal information. Quote, they analyze the data and
Speaker 1: then because you stick out in some way, now you're
Speaker 1: treated as if you're already have had due process, as
Speaker 1: if you've already been found guilty of a crime resulting
Speaker 1: in the government kicking down the doors of innocent people.
Speaker 2: If you understand the.
Speaker 1: Technology, you'll see that this is an intelligence operation is
Speaker 1: using geospatial intelligence. Information from low level surveillance technologies like
Speaker 1: stingray and predictive policing programs are all getting siphoned up
Speaker 1: into NSA data centers, a detailed global map that will
Speaker 1: continue to grow with near endless stats on all individuals. Well,
Speaker 1: the intercept said this much was true in broad strokes,
Speaker 1: if not the specifics. They don't say what specifically they
Speaker 1: disagree with about that, And quite frankly, there isn't anything
Speaker 1: that I see in this article where they disagree with it.
Speaker 1: The biggest thing they said is that it's worse than
Speaker 1: I predicted. And it's not just the nssay, it's all
Speaker 1: these other agencies that are all hooked into the flock
Speaker 1: cameras and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Makes me sick. Makes me sick.
Speaker 1: The budget for DHS in twenty twenty five ten times
Speaker 1: the agency's total surveillance spending combined over the last thirteen years.
Speaker 2: Think about that.
Speaker 1: So, since we were talking about that type of thing,
Speaker 1: you take all of their surveillance stuff for all those years,
Speaker 1: all those thirteen years that we were talking about it,
Speaker 1: warning people about it, and then Trump comes in in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five and in one year he has a
Speaker 1: bigger budget for surveillance than the last thirteen years combined.
Speaker 1: Alex Jones, you sold out, you son of a bitch.
Speaker 1: Thanks to the unregulated.
Speaker 3: Thanks to the unregulated market in commercial surveillance technology, DHS
Speaker 3: has little need for a spy agency like the NSA.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right. So you know, when you look
Speaker 1: at this and they throw in some things here that
Speaker 1: were false speculations, some of the infra wars orbit speculated.
Speaker 1: The word JADE itself may or may not be an
Speaker 1: acronym for a military developed artificial intelligence. And again that
Speaker 1: was never true, never said anything. I don't know where
Speaker 1: they found that. I never heard that actually even when
Speaker 1: I was there. But it's these kinds of false details
Speaker 1: that are added to discredit what is really going on.
Speaker 1: And that's why I said that about jade Helm in general.
Speaker 1: They laid out and implied they were going to do
Speaker 1: something which they didn't do, and that in and of
Speaker 1: itself was a way to try to discredit all the
Speaker 1: criticism of the police surveillance state, which is now rolled out.
Speaker 1: That's the reality, folks, that's where we are. The federal
Speaker 1: government is willing to use force, surveillance and extra constitutional
Speaker 1: power to suppress dissent. That's what we know. These abuses
Speaker 1: aren't a problem so long as that somebody else's back
Speaker 1: that's been pushed onto the concrete, somebody else's car windows
Speaker 1: that are smashed, somebody else who's dealing with the pain
Speaker 1: of a chemical irritant, or somebody else who gets disarmed
Speaker 1: and shot in the back. The contingent of the country
Speaker 1: that swore to avenge Ruby Ridge and Waco now seem
Speaker 1: mostly content to cheer on more of the same, and
Speaker 1: under the X videos that you see, the far right
Speaker 1: is making clear their opposition was never to authoritarian violence
Speaker 1: or state terror, but instead being subjected to that violence
Speaker 1: and terror themselves. They only defended individuals and political parties.
Speaker 1: They didn't defend principles. They didn't understand how this say.
Speaker 1: If you don't defend the principles, you're going to wind
Speaker 1: up in the crosshairs. That's clearly the case. So while
Speaker 1: the NRA used to call the federal police jack booted
Speaker 1: government thugs, now they felt after the death of Alex
Speaker 1: pretty because they started saying, well, look he had a gun. Oh,
Speaker 1: let's step this back. They said, well he wasagonizing ice.
Speaker 1: Now they had a right to carry your arms, of course,
Speaker 1: but he was antagonizing ice. And so that's why they
Speaker 1: killed him. You know, it's a death penalty to antagonize.
Speaker 1: These masked thugs. Don't get in their face, don't film them,
Speaker 1: because that interfere with their quote unquote investigation. Well, the
Speaker 1: investigation should come before the violent force, shouldn't it. The
Speaker 1: problem is they don't do an investigation, they don't do
Speaker 1: a warrant. They go in to break into a house
Speaker 1: and take out a guy who is decades older than
Speaker 1: the person. Their cover story that emerges later well, we're
Speaker 1: looking for these other two individuals. They were in their twenties,
Speaker 1: so we grabbed this guy who's in his sixties and
Speaker 1: drug him out in the ten degree weather. If you'd
Speaker 1: done an investigation in the first place, if you'd had
Speaker 1: a warrant, maybe that wouldn't have happened. Anyway, As they
Speaker 1: pointed out, if it Wars is Jade Helm's coverage now
Speaker 1: seemingly scrubbed from the site. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: I thought it was suspicious the way Alex acted when
Speaker 1: I went to the Asymmetric Warfare Center. At the time,
Speaker 1: I thought it was real suspicious. Now I see it
Speaker 1: for what it was. Absolutely the spirit of the old
Speaker 1: anti state paranoia of info Wars remains, but it's just
Speaker 1: inverted into the service of the state. That's what's going on.
Speaker 1: The notion of camouflaged agents in the streets caused for
Speaker 1: celebration now, not for an emergency broadcast. This is a
Speaker 1: headline that just was put out by Info Wars. They said, quote,
Speaker 1: a war has erupted on the streets of America and
Speaker 1: it's going to end with martial law in major US cities.
Speaker 1: And with that headline, they put up an AI generated
Speaker 1: imagor federal officers defending themselves from an antif onslaught. You see,
Speaker 1: now the Feds are the victims. They're not the jack
Speaker 1: booted thugs anymore. They're the victims those of This stuff
Speaker 1: is all about, well, we're going to and people are
Speaker 1: to take a break. Let me just say this. Marjorie Telgreen,
Speaker 1: who's now out of Congress after having resigned, she said
Speaker 1: MAGA was all a lie. That's absolutely right. It's not
Speaker 1: about making America great again. She said that in his
Speaker 1: first year back in office, Trump has just focused on
Speaker 1: obliging his wealthy supporters. It's worse than that, Marjorie. He
Speaker 1: just wants to get much wealthier himself. I mean, just
Speaker 1: look at everything that he's done. He's made over a
Speaker 1: billion dollars this last year he and his family. So
Speaker 1: it is graft, it is corruption, total disregard for America.
Speaker 1: He's totally focused on his faux peace prize that he
Speaker 1: thinks he deserves for starting all these wars. I mean,
Speaker 1: how insane can you be?
Speaker 2: She said?
Speaker 1: It was a big life for the people. What MAGA
Speaker 1: is really serving in this administration, who they're serving is
Speaker 1: their big donors, the big, big donors that donated all
Speaker 1: the money and continued to donate to the President's packs
Speaker 1: and donate to the two and fiftieth anniversary, and are
Speaker 1: donating to the Big Ballroom, which is most likely a
Speaker 1: underground bunker. On Wednesday, she said the people who truly
Speaker 1: benefit from backing Trump and financial benefactors are the people
Speaker 1: that get the special favors. They get the government contracts,
Speaker 1: they get the pardons, and somebody they love or one
Speaker 1: of their friends and get say pardon. She criticized the
Speaker 1: favoritism for Trump's wealthy allies and also slammed the president
Speaker 1: for focusing on foreign policy rather than problems at home.
Speaker 1: It's the foreign countries they're running the show here. It's
Speaker 1: the major, big corporations and what's best for the world.
Speaker 1: That's really what Maga is. We're seeing war on the
Speaker 1: behalf of Israel. We're seeing the people in Gaza, innocent
Speaker 1: people in Gaza, hundreds of thousands of them completely murdered,
Speaker 1: complete that way, only partially murdered, right so they can
Speaker 1: build some new real estate development. So anyway, she's focusing
Speaker 1: on the financial betrayal. I'm still you can't find people
Speaker 1: in Washington who will say anything about the police surveillance state,
Speaker 1: even if they criticize Trump's grifting the common man. They
Speaker 1: created common Core that dumbed down our children. They created
Speaker 1: common Past to track and control us, their Commons project
Speaker 1: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 1: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 1: each of us has worth and dignity in the image
Speaker 1: of God. That is what we have in common. That
Speaker 1: is what they want to take away. Their most powerful
Speaker 1: weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything
Speaker 1: about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time
Speaker 1: to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Speaker 1: Please share the information and links you'll find at the
Speaker 1: Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing.
Speaker 1: If you can't support us financially, please keep us in
Speaker 1: your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com