Speaker 1: After a long hiatus, the inquisition is back. Right now,
Speaker 1: we have Thomas, Peter quinnone is, and of course the
Speaker 1: man who's perpetually on color people time, Carl Tall.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm I'm I'm surprised you were able to make it.
Speaker 1: I mean it's only like five minutes late. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a this is some type of land speed
Speaker 1: record for you.
Speaker 3: Girl.
Speaker 4: Hey, I'm usually on time, but many of these early
Speaker 4: afternoon things. I have other pressing items. But thank you
Speaker 4: for your patience, gentlemen.
Speaker 2: Good job. Yeah, allegedly.
Speaker 1: All right, I think that's as full of a house
Speaker 1: as we're going to get. Thomas. You want to kick
Speaker 1: us off with Iran. I've been exhausted with with just
Speaker 1: the Iran talk watching it spiral. I think the domestic
Speaker 1: implications of it are far more interesting.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I the people were throwing shade on on Friar
Speaker 3: Tuck for apologizing for endorsing Trump. I think that was
Speaker 3: every sincere sentiment, and and it was well placed. I
Speaker 3: this regime is in, This administration is indefensible. I mean,
Speaker 3: even if even if you're some sort of infantile moron
Speaker 3: or some sort of or some sort of race traders
Speaker 3: zionists within the parameters of of those commitments. There there's
Speaker 3: absolutely no strategic framework to the war in Iran. There's
Speaker 3: no plause of a military mission. There's not a four
Speaker 3: structure that can facilitate an outcome. There's there's not there's
Speaker 3: not any declared outcome. They're declared objective that could be
Speaker 3: realized as a military outcome, and I think that that's
Speaker 3: I think that that's inarguable. I've tried to make the
Speaker 3: point of people too, especially when Rabbi Trump. I mean,
Speaker 3: first of all, too it's Trump's handlers. It should be
Speaker 3: it should be restricting him from social media and keeping
Speaker 3: him out of public view at all costs, like Colonel
Speaker 3: House did Wilson after Wilson had a massive stroke the
Speaker 3: last year and a half his administration and for all
Speaker 3: redical purposes, his mind was gone. So a House made
Speaker 3: sure that, you know, and I mean for decades people
Speaker 3: didn't know about this, you know, Finally, song Wilson's staffers
Speaker 3: came clean. Literally in the nineteen fifties, you know, those
Speaker 3: were still alive. But just like letting Trump make a
Speaker 3: fool of himself on social media day, after day after day.
Speaker 3: I mean, you really, your only job if in one
Speaker 3: of the more superfluous cabinet positions, is making sure that
Speaker 3: doesn't happen. But I you know, aside from that, I'm
Speaker 3: sure people think I'm just being canta ris or banantic.
Speaker 3: But when people try and organize the discussion around well,
Speaker 3: it's it's it's terrible. At Trump's talking about regime change.
Speaker 3: Regime change doesn't exist. It's some delusional fantasy of globalists
Speaker 3: and and and Zionist the Cretans who who incessaly want
Speaker 3: to avail other societies to unprovoked violent military action. There
Speaker 3: there's never been a single instance where an unprovoked massive
Speaker 3: military assault on a foreign society has resulted in the
Speaker 3: body politics spontaneously deciding they love the people killing them
Speaker 3: and they want to provide an actual, organic, majoritary and mandate.
Speaker 3: That's some client of the government that is killing them
Speaker 3: and attack their country like that. That's asinine. Like anybody
Speaker 3: anybody who thinks that that is possible, or that is
Speaker 3: a thing, or that that's some sort of press offended
Speaker 3: activity or outcome in the historical record, they're either staggeringly
Speaker 3: fucking stupid, or they're literally delusional. So let's remove let's
Speaker 3: remove the phrase regime change from the lexicon. I think, uh,
Speaker 3: I think it was coined by that uh bye, by
Speaker 3: that future incupent, the William Crystal. Anyway, it's like, why
Speaker 3: why this, why why somebody like him is being allowed
Speaker 3: to invent, you know, invent invant terms that are are
Speaker 3: are then bandied as if they have some sort of
Speaker 3: deep and substantive meaning is beyond me. But you know
Speaker 3: that the regime changes and something that exists, it's like
Speaker 3: saying easter bunny or uh or you know, something on
Speaker 3: that order of it as a meaning. So I don't
Speaker 3: even people, uh even even people lack sophistication or a
Speaker 3: meaningful understanding the implications of the deeper implications of what's
Speaker 3: underway here. You're talking about an indefensible policy course that
Speaker 3: obviously is you know, only going to result in the
Speaker 3: material impoverishment of the country and and the diminution of
Speaker 3: what remains of it's vestal credibility. So yeah, I I a.
Speaker 3: Trump has managed to accomplish nothing during his tenure rather
Speaker 3: than to you know, again like further pissed away any
Speaker 3: vestial credibility that I'm marry I had. So I mean,
Speaker 3: and then that's a positive because this regime needs to
Speaker 3: die and the more that's expedited the better. But yeah,
Speaker 3: that that's the main story. You know, it's not well.
Speaker 2: And then you have these low IQ mutants out there
Speaker 2: who are like, no, no, Trump needs to add this
Speaker 2: way because he has to be tough with other countries
Speaker 2: because other tons. Putin is tough, She is tough, so
Speaker 2: he has to act tough. The problem is he's not
Speaker 2: acting tough. He's acting like the old man that you
Speaker 2: know used to get put into a public asylums before
Speaker 2: fucking Reagan closed him because he was probably gonna end
Speaker 2: up in one. He's fucking that's not acting tough.
Speaker 3: But I don't know what he means like because yeah,
Speaker 3: I mean the the strategic landscapes that like a junior
Speaker 3: high school playground.
Speaker 1: But if we're talking about credits, Putin act tough. Putin
Speaker 1: doesn't act tough.
Speaker 3: He has quiet like in the uh In in the
Speaker 3: If we're talking about credibility in the terms that it
Speaker 3: was discussed during the Cold War, where that those concepts
Speaker 3: had meaning and had implications for you know, everything from
Speaker 3: force structure to the ability to deploy at scale without
Speaker 3: resorting to open hostilities and still yield desirable outcomes. You
Speaker 3: know that that came down to that, that came down
Speaker 3: to a force structure that was able to produce outcomes
Speaker 3: commensurate with you know, the desire strategic interest. It didn't.
Speaker 3: There's really not there's not just like wide range of
Speaker 3: outcomes from deploying military force, you know, and there there's
Speaker 3: a very very narrow spectrum of UH activity that you know,
Speaker 3: UH will be yielded from that. You know, this idea
Speaker 3: that there's some like open ended, creative aspect to attacking
Speaker 3: other countries is literally senile or and delusional. But also
Speaker 3: again without UH, without a meaningful strategic framework, you know,
Speaker 3: it's the same, it's the same, it's the same anti
Speaker 3: logic as UH Ukraine. But at least there I believe
Speaker 3: the I mean, at least on the Zionist side. Their
Speaker 3: view is that, you know, they wanted to punish Russia
Speaker 3: for the l they got, you know, the IDEF got
Speaker 3: handed in Syria and the lev but also they want
Speaker 3: to permanent I mean, they want to kill Slavs because
Speaker 3: they they are a genocidal hatred of the people who
Speaker 3: live there, but they also they want to permanently tie
Speaker 3: down the Russians their own frontier. But this idea that
Speaker 3: in broad strokes, that Ukraine is gonna defeat the arenforce
Speaker 3: of the Russian Federation, then invade Russia, then prevent the
Speaker 3: armed force the Reservation from reconstituting, then occupy Moscow, then
Speaker 3: overthrow the government. You're literally delusional if you think that's
Speaker 3: going to happen. That's that's ridiculous, that's a joke, just
Speaker 3: like these fools who you know, one of the reasons
Speaker 3: why I got contempt not just for the conservative enemy
Speaker 3: and these people who act, as you know, unpaid in
Speaker 3: some cases compensated propaganda, is for this criminal regime. But
Speaker 3: even some of these people's supposedly on side, the you know,
Speaker 3: part of their grift is like dropping a hysterical click
Speaker 3: bait like this World War three, Trump's gonna invade Iran.
Speaker 3: It's like with with what so Trump, He's gonna invade
Speaker 3: a country of one hundred million people that is the
Speaker 3: seventeenth largest country on this planet. And uh, you know,
Speaker 3: the arm force of Iran is gonna be wiped out.
Speaker 3: His bood's gonna be wiped out. Iraq's also gonna be
Speaker 3: invaded because sympathetic correligion is under arms, is gonna be
Speaker 3: then wiped out. Then Turan's gonna be occupied. Then the
Speaker 3: government's gonna be overthrown. You know, it's like you it's
Speaker 3: a acting like Trump is God, or like he's or
Speaker 3: like he's elegantor the great, or acting like uh, the
Speaker 3: mill the zog and military apparatus to some is like
Speaker 3: the RMACK two point zero or I mean that's that's
Speaker 3: a fucking joke, you know these this is Anybody who
Speaker 3: talks that way again is either totally delusional or totally senile.
Speaker 1: Yeah, or war three without any mass mobilization of men
Speaker 1: under arms, with no strategic build up of our magazine
Speaker 1: depth of existing systems, no manufacturing of new systems, no
Speaker 1: positioning of those systems, no staging of those those like
Speaker 1: they don't know what the fuck they're talking about.
Speaker 3: No, I no infrastructure of to sustain it. But it's
Speaker 3: also too under globalism. It's like people I don't understand
Speaker 3: because some of these people are my age or older
Speaker 3: than me. It's like did you take a nap? It's
Speaker 3: like a you rip fan winkle, Did you take a nap,
Speaker 3: you know, on November eight, nineteen eighty nine, and then
Speaker 3: just wake up yesterday. It's like you not understand that
Speaker 3: the twentieth century ended. You know, this idea that this
Speaker 3: idea that interstate warring, interstate conventional combined arms warring at
Speaker 3: massive scale, the idea that this is some normal thing
Speaker 3: that never ever, ever, ever ever happens. Like the twentieth
Speaker 3: century was this bizarre and insane outlier because that became
Speaker 3: the norm that literally never happens. You know, the the
Speaker 3: war Marland and stuff like Bosnia is like the idea
Speaker 3: that the like the the the idea that a country
Speaker 3: like Russia or that China is gonna somehow secede from
Speaker 3: the globalist apparatus, is gonna build up some World War
Speaker 3: two style combined arms force then decide for no reason
Speaker 3: to attack the US carrier fleet in uh in the
Speaker 3: Pacific and pretend to fight the Battle of Midway. I
Speaker 3: mean that's like saying that's literally an order is saying, Okay,
Speaker 3: the British are gonna the British are gonna attack Washington,
Speaker 3: d C. But they're gonna do it with sailboats and
Speaker 3: they're gonna arm their men with muskets. They're gonna wear
Speaker 3: bright red coats when they do it, and they want
Speaker 3: to do that to burn down the White House, to
Speaker 3: humiliate the colonies. See that happen in eighteen twelve. So
Speaker 3: what's gonna happen again? That's literally in the order of
Speaker 3: saying that.
Speaker 4: But Tom the TV has prepared me for this moment
Speaker 4: for the past fifty years. Ever since nineteen eighty.
Speaker 1: Two, we've been at war with Iran for forty what
Speaker 1: is what is the.
Speaker 2: What is the forty seven years? For years?
Speaker 3: What's about here?
Speaker 2: Come on? Come on? These are what you're doing is
Speaker 2: these are still people who in their minds who are like,
Speaker 2: but we beat the Nazis, we beat the slow pads.
Speaker 2: But I mean you're telling me, you're telling me that
Speaker 2: we shouldn't have done that. They were bad.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but it's like, I say, Okay, what's an American?
Speaker 1: You said that the Americans beat all these guys? What
Speaker 1: what what is an American?
Speaker 3: Well, I mean according to why should I Why should I?
Speaker 1: Why should I fight?
Speaker 3: It's people with the right paperwork, according to regime, criminals
Speaker 3: and the helots who serve them. But I by my
Speaker 3: point is.
Speaker 1: Have those motherfuckers go to the enlistment center.
Speaker 3: But I mean, even if even if somebody has got these,
Speaker 3: even if somebody's I mean, even if you're some zion
Speaker 3: As Jew, or even if you're some you know, like
Speaker 3: whinoh helot, It's like, again, within the boundary rationality of
Speaker 3: those commitments, this is delusion, you know. And it doesn't
Speaker 3: as there's this idea that you know within uh you know,
Speaker 3: I mean if I mean, I think of this every day. Man.
Speaker 3: It's like if there were if the regime was smart,
Speaker 3: and if it basically it it basically would have leaned
Speaker 3: into the way things were going anyway and are being
Speaker 3: fully right now after nineteen eighty nine, It basically would
Speaker 3: have dismantled this sort of public bureaucracy and the tax
Speaker 3: funded military and then essentially profited by these nominally private
Speaker 3: entities that nonetheless are basically the government and are different guys,
Speaker 3: And they would have replaced the military essentially with a
Speaker 3: dozen Blackwater type outfits, you know, and uh essentially uh
Speaker 3: duplicated that model in a dozen different theaters, you know,
Speaker 3: while retaining ultimate command and control authority. Like that's how
Speaker 3: you do it, you know, And that's how and that's
Speaker 3: how you and and you know, a sophisticated propaganda apparatus
Speaker 3: that makes hostile propaganda within the targeted theater appear to
Speaker 3: be truly spontaneous. Like that's how you do it. You know,
Speaker 3: you don't maintain fourteen obsolete aircraft carriers, pretend that globalism
Speaker 3: never happened, that Vladimir Putin is an evil man, and
Speaker 3: then hurl the population of your proxy state over and
Speaker 3: over and over and over and over again at the
Speaker 3: Russian Federation and then declare victory every week. Like that's
Speaker 3: not how you do it.
Speaker 1: And you could literally partner up with the the out
Speaker 1: out groups in these various countries do make you could
Speaker 1: if you did, if you did the way Thomas is describing,
Speaker 1: you could literally have this apparatus pay for itself.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that too, And it's uh, what's also it's I
Speaker 3: mean there's a really people like like it's some big mystery.
Speaker 3: How the Yeah, I think the British raj I think
Speaker 3: at peak like not not counting guys who were serving
Speaker 3: crown charter companies or just you know, like freebooter businessmen.
Speaker 3: I think there was literally about like two thousand guys
Speaker 3: who were in uniform or serving the crown a direct
Speaker 3: capacity if by you know, in in the nineteen twenties
Speaker 3: and they were they were ruling over you know, like
Speaker 3: four hundred million people on the sub continent. You know,
Speaker 3: it's not that's not just something like weird accident, and
Speaker 3: it's not because you know, Hindus are stupid or something,
Speaker 3: you know, or whatever people bandy about. I mean, obviously
Speaker 3: you can't reduce this stuff to memes anyway, but you know,
Speaker 3: the the uh you know that that's that's how you
Speaker 3: sustain something like that, and uh plus two, I mean
Speaker 3: it's just I don't I will die in this hill.
Speaker 3: And I think it's another thing people misconstrue because of
Speaker 3: the poisoning at discourse by these sort of gadfly ideologies
Speaker 3: that normally exists outside of the Internet. But feeling up
Speaker 3: making some libertarian point when I raised the fact that
Speaker 3: as structured, the regime is decades obsolete. You know, they
Speaker 3: they they they don't understand that what the government claims
Speaker 3: the strategic reality as well as the reality of complex
Speaker 3: independence is totally at odds with actual reality, you know,
Speaker 3: and maintaining, uh, that the force structure is constituted even
Speaker 3: accounting for them, these canceled programs that arguably were progressive
Speaker 3: in in terms of their potential uh in terms of
Speaker 3: potential near peri adversaries that we're being contemplated within the
Speaker 3: scenarios these platforms were devised for, you know, like the
Speaker 3: littoral ships. You the regime is structured its military apparatus
Speaker 3: as like a scaled down duplicate of the Rima era military.
Speaker 3: That literally makes no sense, you know, And if you
Speaker 3: read about how these like command decisions are made, it's
Speaker 3: it's literally make work for uniform fetishists and delusional people
Speaker 3: who don't understand that twentieth century style of warfare. Not
Speaker 3: only is it not only is it forty years obsolete,
Speaker 3: but even in the epoch it was this total outlier,
Speaker 3: you know. And I.
Speaker 1: For the average IQ of a you of a officer
Speaker 1: in the United States military is ninety eight.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that sounds about right. That doesn't surprise me.
Speaker 1: That's for your officer corps because we you know, just
Speaker 1: like every other place in the civil service. And if
Speaker 1: you legally mandate, you know, the if you make it
Speaker 1: illegal of to test aptitude in any type of way,
Speaker 1: that may be discriminatory you're going to get an army
Speaker 1: full of retards, You're going to get a civil bureaucracy
Speaker 1: full of retards. And this is not hard like how
Speaker 1: can but I mean, I mean World War two is
Speaker 1: kind of like it's an is kind of an outlier,
Speaker 1: like you're talking about. But even the men that fought that,
Speaker 1: Like you can go to the Navy and I bet
Speaker 1: you test any single one of those guys in the
Speaker 1: Pacific Theater. You're dealing with geniuses, each of the one.
Speaker 3: That's why people had a big deal about it. That
Speaker 3: Don it's uh, Don, it's at the highest IQ out
Speaker 3: of all and Nermer defendants except I think Helm are shocked,
Speaker 3: and I yeah, I mean they being a Navy admiral
Speaker 3: in the mid twentieth century, you had to be something
Speaker 3: of a prodigy, you know. But I uh, but I
Speaker 3: mean it's just a regime that's not that that doesn't
Speaker 3: abide the zeitgeist. Is not long for this earth, you know.
Speaker 3: And like I said, I'm not I'm not suggesting some
Speaker 3: punctuated collapses inm and this is this is not going
Speaker 3: process that's gonna be like a century and a half
Speaker 3: or two hundred years until it comes to full fruition.
Speaker 3: But like that this idea that the regime you can
Speaker 3: continue at naked odds with reality while masquerading as if
Speaker 3: the twentieth century is still upon us. I mean that
Speaker 3: that would have been like, uh, that would have been
Speaker 3: like when the when the Soviet system was actually actually
Speaker 3: exhibited vitality, if the Pullet Bureau and the Supreme Soviet
Speaker 3: masqueraded as if there was still az Ar, Like it doesn't.
Speaker 3: You can't. You can't proceed at odds with consensus reality
Speaker 3: and physical reality and and and sustain you know, aggregate
Speaker 3: political power within a dynamic system that is governed by
Speaker 3: historical processes in both approximate and remote capacity. And like
Speaker 3: I said, I'll die in that hill.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's it's it's coming to a point where we've
Speaker 1: I started to look at it like like Pete said
Speaker 1: about the dysgenic freaks that you know view it as
Speaker 1: their religion, almost like Trump as a as a religion,
Speaker 1: to where they too to admit any any fault or
Speaker 1: the lack of a plan. Is similar to you know,
Speaker 1: denying that you know, God constructed the universe to where
Speaker 1: like the truth or falsity of that statement could literally
Speaker 1: unwind existence, Like this is how they view the fallibility
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: But holding onto a quarter, you know, a quarter millennia
Speaker 2: ago civic national belief in civic nationalism.
Speaker 1: That works, That works when we're ninety percent white.
Speaker 3: But I mean these people they don't they don't actually
Speaker 3: have opinions. I mean, that's why I was coming out
Speaker 3: to the point, like these people have no take. You know,
Speaker 3: they're and I think a lot of these motherfuckers don't
Speaker 3: even leave their house or they you know, they or
Speaker 3: they live in some shit town. They have no idea
Speaker 3: what the fuck's going on, even in day today capacities.
Speaker 3: They consume memes and and uh, they watched some you know,
Speaker 3: some goofy YouTuber who calls like everybody that he doesn't
Speaker 3: like a Marxist or something. And then they and then
Speaker 3: they decide that like they have some take, Like these
Speaker 3: people have no take. You know, they're they're conceptual I literates,
Speaker 3: So I treat them like a literates. You know, they're
Speaker 3: not they're not part of this.
Speaker 4: It's it's like you said, Thomas, uh that they're playing
Speaker 4: an online MMO RPG called The Online Right, Like it's yeah,
Speaker 4: completely irrelevant, And the good news is there aren't that
Speaker 4: many of them or that are under seventy five years old,
Speaker 4: and so so it's completely irrelevant that these people are
Speaker 4: completely relevant. Yeah, we have to see them, Yeah, we
Speaker 4: have to deal with them, you know from time to
Speaker 4: time or other people encounter them.
Speaker 2: We ignore them.
Speaker 4: But like they're completely irrelevant, and so I just can't
Speaker 4: get like too down about it. It sucks, yeah, and
Speaker 4: they don't got to charge through it, right.
Speaker 3: So the same thing to people about these like grifters
Speaker 3: and these like nobody's like like Princess Dicky Spencer and
Speaker 3: like that that that Milo fig. It's like these guys
Speaker 3: are these guys are nobody's you know, they it's some
Speaker 3: vanity fair. In the Washington Post one they declared that
Speaker 3: like these random theater kids who like play it being
Speaker 3: the alt right, which is a term that makes no
Speaker 3: sense either that they invented, are are like an actual thing,
Speaker 3: you know. And it's like if you if that's what
Speaker 3: structures are, conceptual horizon, you know, you you you basically
Speaker 3: view the world through the lens of system media. You know.
Speaker 3: It's like so why, It's like, so, why why do
Speaker 3: you think you're dissitting coded. If reality to you is
Speaker 3: what is what legacy media says it is, you know,
Speaker 3: that's why I don't. But I mean, like I was
Speaker 3: just I was limiting the Pete a minute ago. Of
Speaker 3: Pete was nice enough to sit in on my life
Speaker 3: stream and help me with it this afternoon, like we
Speaker 3: do on Thursdays. I still I still get fools like
Speaker 3: emailing me. You're popping up on my on my substec threads,
Speaker 3: you know, saying like you know you you gotta you've
Speaker 3: got to get big on Twitter to reach more people,
Speaker 3: and you've got to like moderate this. I'm like, who
Speaker 3: the fuck told you that I'm part of the Jehovah's
Speaker 3: Witnesses or that, like I'm trying to I'm trying to
Speaker 3: like run for office or something. I'm like, if you
Speaker 3: think that, it's like, why do you fucking like content?
Speaker 3: If you think that way, you know, like you're it's
Speaker 3: like you're a total wiro. I spread of got to
Speaker 3: some of these people. They don't even really consume content.
Speaker 3: They're so fucking stupid, and their attention span is that
Speaker 3: of like a dung beetle. It's like they they like
Speaker 3: they they look at memes like on TikTok, and they
Speaker 3: got some like loose idea where like they'll you know,
Speaker 3: they'll like recognize me or some other kind of like
Speaker 3: subcultural comment creator and be like, oh, that's that's that
Speaker 3: right wing gu You right wing is Donald Trump and
Speaker 3: like making watermelon jokes about niggers. So that guy is
Speaker 3: this right wing guy. And if you're a right wing ga,
Speaker 3: you've got to like own the Libs by voting the
Speaker 3: right way. Like I think it's it's literally like that.
Speaker 3: I think they don't. I think it's people like never
Speaker 3: read anything I've written, Like never like listen anything I said.
Speaker 3: You know, it's it's it's it's literally in the level
Speaker 3: of like you know, monkey me recognition.
Speaker 1: It's it's a it's almost like a complete lack of
Speaker 1: the ability to conceptualize oneself out of outside of their
Speaker 1: immediate surroundings, that's outside of their immediate reality, because it's
Speaker 1: like they can't interpret anything you say outside of the
Speaker 1: lens of what exists now. Right, Yeah, structure, you have
Speaker 1: to do an election something like oh, well, I mean,
Speaker 1: I guess Thomas has to like he's gonna he's gonna
Speaker 1: have to run for office. Or he's gonna have to
Speaker 1: like get the message out like they they're they're using
Speaker 1: something that was not real and handed to them as
Speaker 1: the lens through which they evaluate any and all new information,
Speaker 1: including yours.
Speaker 3: No exactly, Well that's why too, I mean, we gotta
Speaker 3: and this this is a juwiys of ap point. And
Speaker 3: you know, like I said, I I've always leaned in
Speaker 3: that direction in terms of sort of like the underlying
Speaker 3: theoretical paradigm that I abide, but as I age, I
Speaker 3: take it increasingly seriously like you've gotta. And I I'm
Speaker 3: sure people who hate on my perspective and on me
Speaker 3: for personal reasons because they're ysfunctional, are gonna say that
Speaker 3: this is just some rationalization for you know, like a
Speaker 3: misplaced the sense of elite status or whatever. But you
Speaker 3: you've got to realize literally like ninety five percent of
Speaker 3: these people like have no take. You know, they're not
Speaker 3: they're not part of this. You know, there's always and
Speaker 3: the people who win in revolutionary capacities, you know, whether
Speaker 3: you're talking about the NSDAP and the struggle years, or
Speaker 3: whether you're talking about the Leninist cadre that conquered the
Speaker 3: Russian empire or what they're talking about Seala Star and Cambodia.
Speaker 3: You're you're always talking about a cadre structure that is
Speaker 3: a minority within a minority of vanguardists, you know, and uh,
Speaker 3: eventually such that and because this isn't the twentieth century,
Speaker 3: this is increasingly diminishing in importance every day, such that
Speaker 3: you do need to build at least like a raw
Speaker 3: majority of at least a plurality within the sensibilities the
Speaker 3: body politic. I mean that that that that comes basically
Speaker 3: after you've defeated all the other vanguardist tendencies. So because
Speaker 3: they just they just follow the leader, and the leader
Speaker 3: is whoever you know, dominates uh, the core institutions in
Speaker 3: such a way that you know, you can impose as
Speaker 3: will across the entire structure.
Speaker 1: You know, it's beneficial for being a part of that comedy.
Speaker 3: I'll go ahead. I'm sorry, No.
Speaker 1: I said it has to be that way. It can't
Speaker 1: be any other way because or else there's no benefit
Speaker 1: of being the only way to get that majority is
Speaker 1: to dictatorily control those institutions, because it's the only way
Speaker 1: that you can confer any type of benefit and raise
Speaker 1: up others like, if you can't raise me up in
Speaker 1: power and protect me from you know, the wiles and
Speaker 1: machinations of the world, I have no reason to follow
Speaker 1: whatever political program, even whether I believe in it or not.
Speaker 1: So they basically Thomas, it has to play out exactly
Speaker 1: as you said, because it's the only way it can
Speaker 1: play out.
Speaker 3: Well. Also, no, that's true in nottological terms, definitely, but
Speaker 3: also in the way people in the in the way
Speaker 3: people develop a conceptual picture. It's it's it's both complicated
Speaker 3: and it's not. I mean, it's complicated because the structures
Speaker 3: of mind, particularly that constitute the conceptual aspect of mind,
Speaker 3: and people's ability to structure abstract phenomena and and and
Speaker 3: render it concrete according to you know, various reference points,
Speaker 3: both tangible and symbolic. That that's a commoicated process. And
Speaker 3: you're talking about someone who's not particularly intelligent. But uh,
Speaker 3: it's it's it's at the same time simpler than a
Speaker 3: lot of people make it. You know, it's not the
Speaker 3: the the body politics not sitting around spending their day
Speaker 3: in a library or contemplating you know, the nature of
Speaker 3: man is a political animal. And even today with uh, remarkable,
Speaker 3: you know, information awareness that is temporally current almost to
Speaker 3: the millisecond. People aren't developing some independent perspective unmass of
Speaker 3: how political affairs are structured. It's always, uh, a top
Speaker 3: down engineering of a psychological environment and then further curating
Speaker 3: that environment, you know, towards particular ends, you know, based
Speaker 3: on demographic considerations and you know, based on contingencies of
Speaker 3: a historical or sociological nature that you know, whoever's controlling
Speaker 3: the flow of information, which is emphasized that this is
Speaker 3: this is the way propaganda works, you know. And uh,
Speaker 3: and propaganda's not axiomatically insidious. I mean, it's it's become
Speaker 3: a sort of a synonym for evil or disinformation. I mean,
Speaker 3: it can mean that, but it can also just literally
Speaker 3: mean public awareness, you know, and uh, you know it's
Speaker 3: not uh. And there's also like an instinctive aspect of
Speaker 3: this too. Man. So I'm always emphasized when I the
Speaker 3: only reason why a random brand like mine has any
Speaker 3: legs is because I know what the fuck I'm talking about,
Speaker 3: And it's not because I've got like some like super
Speaker 3: high IQ.
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 3: It's not a question of intelligence in that sense. Instinctively,
Speaker 3: you can either perceive these things that you can't. It's
Speaker 3: like having an instinct for playing cards. Like Stewie Younger,
Speaker 3: he was the Yeah, he could count cards and he
Speaker 3: was a smart guy. But a lot of guys are
Speaker 3: smarting and count cards. Stuet Younger somehow became the greatest
Speaker 3: Gin player who ever lived because he had some weird
Speaker 3: instinct for the game other people don't have, you know.
Speaker 3: And and systemically, if you can perceive political affairs as
Speaker 3: they're happening, even before they happen, you know, that puts
Speaker 3: you ahead of the pack. And I can do that,
Speaker 3: and that's you know, again, it comes down to like
Speaker 3: how your mind is wired. And this idea that like
Speaker 3: random people who consume uh memes and uh and and
Speaker 3: legacy media like have some take. I mean, that's that's ridiculous,
Speaker 3: and I think that's gonna die too, Like it doesn't
Speaker 3: as people. That meant the fact that the Internet and
Speaker 3: social media and you know, the the ability to consumer
Speaker 3: to curate their own tastes. You know, that's that's that's
Speaker 3: killed the common experience of popular culture, and that further
Speaker 3: sort of like isolates people into these kind of cloistered demographics.
Speaker 3: Like that's like, that's good, Okay. That means that there's
Speaker 3: you know, like a turned to it, a genuine popular
Speaker 3: culture that is produced, you know, within the consumer basis
Speaker 3: of these things, you know, whether you're talking about visual
Speaker 3: art or music or whatever. But it's also that means
Speaker 3: that you know, not only is the not only is
Speaker 3: the legacy media bully pulpit dead because it no longer
Speaker 3: enjoys that absolute monopoly, but there's it's impossible to it's
Speaker 3: impossible to curate a singular and monolithic.
Speaker 1: Yeah, rap music has completely disappeared ye overnight, within one
Speaker 1: with one year here, the next year gone as soon
Speaker 1: as they lost the bully pulpit.
Speaker 3: Yeah exactly. Well that's why, Yeah, that's why I like
Speaker 3: hood culture become like in the early nineties, just like
Speaker 3: absolutely saturating the entirety of media that that was a
Speaker 3: total fucking uh psyop. That there's nothing organic about that
Speaker 3: at all.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's why it took physical like intervention to
Speaker 1: kill rock and roll. But yet rap music was gone
Speaker 1: the second they took their foot off the gas.
Speaker 3: No, exactly. It was weird, it was it was hard
Speaker 3: to like it's as a that's a whole weird thing
Speaker 3: and it doesn't and trying trying to trying to universalize
Speaker 3: it across demographics. Yeah, and it was, uh and and
Speaker 3: to part of it two was ah, I look at
Speaker 3: part of rap music as being I mean, obviously it
Speaker 3: was like a strong ideological catalyst to pushing it, but
Speaker 3: also like if you don't if you're gonna just like
Speaker 3: if you if you're basicly gonna like grab hoodery hats
Speaker 3: off the street, you know, guys like method Man or something,
Speaker 3: and then just like shuttle him into a studio where
Speaker 3: you don't you know, you don't.
Speaker 1: Even need to.
Speaker 3: You just like record the guy like rapping over some
Speaker 3: freaking hook that repeats over and over. But you basically
Speaker 3: just like bottomed out your costs, you know, just like
Speaker 3: it's kind of the same model as like how like
Speaker 3: reality reality TV you know killed uh like traditional prime
Speaker 3: time programming because like reality TV is like I can
Speaker 3: want to be actors to you know, have to pay
Speaker 3: them and they'll pretend Yeah, then I'll pretend it's a documentary.
Speaker 1: The bifurcating So to your point earlier about like you
Speaker 1: didn't want to self designate as an elite, and really
Speaker 1: you don't really have to, right. The only people that
Speaker 1: can sit around all day and read books, sit around
Speaker 1: all day and think about these ideas that are large
Speaker 1: enough to where you have to sit around and think
Speaker 1: about them all a fucking day because they're big, like
Speaker 1: just as a fact of the need of the thing.
Speaker 1: So you have to have some type of life situation
Speaker 1: that removes the necessity for grinding labor. Right, your attention
Speaker 1: is not being purchased by you know, a company, whether
Speaker 1: that be pecking away at a keyboard or moving boxes.
Speaker 1: Your attention is being purchased for money. So it's only
Speaker 1: people that don't have a need for that, whether they
Speaker 1: have obtained a way to financially support themselves or have
Speaker 1: a mass a certain amount of capital to where they
Speaker 1: can you know, support themselves in perpetuity. This takes time,
Speaker 1: like you need time to think about this stuff.
Speaker 3: Well yeah, yeah, absolutely, I mean then u Thorston Veblen
Speaker 3: talking about that and a lot of the a lot
Speaker 3: of the heterootics socialists and interesting things to say, including
Speaker 3: obviously Werner Sombart first and foremost, but Thorston Blenny. He
Speaker 3: famously coined a quote the right to be lazy, and
Speaker 3: people missing, people are stupid on purpose. About what that means,
Speaker 3: I'm saying, it's like laudable to literally be lazy. He
Speaker 3: was saying this idea that man's time must all be
Speaker 3: accounted for and that man's natural state is to be idle.
Speaker 3: So you're really you're really not harming the agency of
Speaker 3: the individual in an industrial economy by forcing him to
Speaker 3: sell his attention and sell his labor to a producer.
Speaker 3: You know, they able and very effectively rebutted that. And
Speaker 3: that's and then and that's very true, you know.
Speaker 1: I right to be at leisure would be a better
Speaker 1: way of you know, translating into today's parlance, because that's
Speaker 1: what a gentleman was.
Speaker 3: At least lost in translation like that. But it but
Speaker 3: it also this idea that uh yeah, that that I
Speaker 3: mean that this I that that that was a real thing.
Speaker 3: And under industrial conditions of a value added national economy,
Speaker 3: you know that like most employers really were time thieves,
Speaker 3: you know, and that's why there there were I mean,
Speaker 3: even uh Mars and Engels, there were there were profound
Speaker 3: sociological insights that they rendered, even if the paradigm that
Speaker 3: those insights emerged we're in was corrupt and you know,
Speaker 3: and and false. That's one of the reasons I think
Speaker 3: sociology seriously, it's been strangled for the same reason why
Speaker 3: disciplines that traditionally would have in the Connell system would
Speaker 3: have been lumped into like philology, like real cultural anthropology
Speaker 3: doesn't exist anymore.
Speaker 1: My bologies that you guys know. Has really kind of
Speaker 1: driven that point home to me in the last couple
Speaker 1: of months to where I'm surprised I didn't see it before.
Speaker 1: But the level of which the social sciences have been
Speaker 1: absolutely just crushed is really hard to grasp until you
Speaker 1: really start digging in there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, very much, I mean, thankfully. I mean, the university
Speaker 3: systems dying. And one of the reasons I do what
Speaker 3: I do is because I think I'm contributing to the
Speaker 3: you know, we're remedying that because there's a there's a
Speaker 3: resurgence in intellectual life, and it's it's being effectively, you know,
Speaker 3: produced just by guys who you know, taking urage in
Speaker 3: these things and dedicate their life to it and find
Speaker 3: a way to monetize.
Speaker 1: This is why it draws such a big difference between
Speaker 1: between streamers and podcasters, right or substectors, because a streamer
Speaker 1: is basically being paid for his attention. Right, you have
Speaker 1: to entertain people right then and there. Right, you have
Speaker 1: to do your dance or whatever it is, and you
Speaker 1: depend on them watching you, and you have to be
Speaker 1: entertaining for them to watch you. It is actually it
Speaker 1: is no different than working a job. You are being
Speaker 1: paid for your attention. But with podcasts and substacks, I
Speaker 1: find that basically it is used it to round and
Speaker 1: you think, right, doing the type of at leisure things
Speaker 1: we're describing, and then you condense those, you know, the
Speaker 1: fruits of that intellectual labor, and you present them right,
Speaker 1: and people pay to support you. Very similar to like
Speaker 1: the patrons of the arts, unfortunately and a much less
Speaker 1: ignoble fashion. But this is what the populoce the population
Speaker 1: is doing. Yeah, they are being patrons of things, which
Speaker 1: if you think about it, and what and what a
Speaker 1: lord's situation.
Speaker 3: Was like yeah, and that's why there's all kinds of
Speaker 3: correctives and that's why black pillars are fucking idiots because.
Speaker 1: It's literally an intellectual lordship.
Speaker 3: Right thank well. I mean in the arts too, it's
Speaker 3: a real thing. There's great music being produced including rock
Speaker 3: and roll. There's great visual art being produced, Like, there's
Speaker 3: all kinds of shit that is great that even twenty
Speaker 3: years ago was unthinkable because the bully pulpit was still
Speaker 3: abs allud do you even if tractors were appearing therein.
Speaker 1: Hey, man, you've got to sell me. The second time
Speaker 1: my family was ennobled was for poetry.
Speaker 3: Yeah, No, the the.
Speaker 1: Anglo society was refined enough once upon a time two
Speaker 1: realize nobility in a man's ability to create poetry. Right,
Speaker 1: Poetry was as good in determining a man's noble worth
Speaker 1: as martial prowess.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, because that's that's part of the that's part
Speaker 3: of the perennial cultural mind. And there's a linear epigenetic
Speaker 3: aspect to heritage. Quite literally, I agree with this that
Speaker 3: that's why culture is very immortal, you know, and that's
Speaker 3: one of the things, along with meaningful faith in God
Speaker 3: and congregational observance they're in that mitigates people's anxiety about
Speaker 3: implement about dying. But also cultural productivity is as important
Speaker 3: as economic productivity or military productivity or anything else. You know,
Speaker 3: it's all part of the prestige, that constant. It's a
Speaker 3: complete human experience, and uh, that's the entire reason for
Speaker 3: these communitarian institutions that taken together constantu it a culture
Speaker 3: or a way of life, you know, And that's why
Speaker 3: it means it's so insidious that, you know, the the
Speaker 3: arts for almost a century have been totally co opted
Speaker 3: by you know, an occupational element whose ambition was to
Speaker 3: not just pornography it, but to decontextualize and deastoricize these
Speaker 3: things and demoralize people and ultimately robin and their ability
Speaker 3: to live historically, which uh is a kind of.
Speaker 1: This in support for modern arts. I have a friend
Speaker 1: who's a very large art dealer, and he and I
Speaker 1: were talking the other day and he said, it's overnight,
Speaker 1: people's interest in not like people's interest in go seeing it,
Speaker 1: but the people that actually support the arts, like the
Speaker 1: people that pay hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions
Speaker 1: of dollars, you know, to stare at it. The interest
Speaker 1: in purchasing modern art has almost collapsed overnight. Interesting, yep, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. Telling everyone only wants great masters, that's it.
Speaker 1: So they only want the classics. It's the only thing
Speaker 1: people are willing to buy.
Speaker 2: What all is broken.
Speaker 1: I think so. I mean, no, he's like, no one
Speaker 1: will no one is really showing up to gallery of
Speaker 1: gallery events for new artists. He's like, really, he and
Speaker 1: I were talking talking about about new artists and when
Speaker 1: you sat like struggled with it for a couple of minutes,
Speaker 1: and we can only think of one one that was worthwhile.
Speaker 1: That one one artist where we would actually purchase painting,
Speaker 1: a painting of his and hang out.
Speaker 3: Wrong, it's mout of on Earth that is dope, you know,
Speaker 3: like the guy who did Appetite for Destruction. Like his
Speaker 3: entire catalog is ah it Williams.
Speaker 1: I think, yeah, I know exactly what you're talking about.
Speaker 3: Yeah, No, it's it's he's awesome, and there's a there's
Speaker 3: random like street artists here that I actually actually like.
Speaker 3: But no, I the days of uh, you know, like
Speaker 3: the the ninety sixties and seventies and even into the eighties,
Speaker 3: this had kind of it became too esoteric. By the nineties,
Speaker 3: he were still paying top dollar from out of Earth
Speaker 3: in the nineties would have become this kind of niche thing.
Speaker 3: But the days where you know, you you host like
Speaker 3: a cocktail party in the seventies and there's some like
Speaker 3: super abstract piece of shit on the wall, and some
Speaker 3: guys like yeah, you know, I get paid like twenty
Speaker 3: thousand dollars for that, and everyone's like ooh, and like
Speaker 3: like nobody nobody's impressed by that anymore, Like even if
Speaker 3: you if you're even if you're into art for the
Speaker 3: wrong reasons, there a cloud chaser, like nobody nobody gives
Speaker 3: a fuck about that, which is fascinating. Yeah, and it's
Speaker 3: well even like, uh, I when people can visit me
Speaker 3: a lot, I like, I take you to the art
Speaker 3: I take into the museum campus. You know, obviously the
Speaker 3: highlight to me is is uh, you know, the U
Speaker 3: five O five submarine, And there's like a shuka at
Speaker 3: the Science inst museum and all kinds of cool stuff.
Speaker 3: But I take onto the Art Institute. I got, I
Speaker 3: got warm feelings about it. My dear friend Ben, who
Speaker 3: was an artist, and he died really tragically years back,
Speaker 3: but he was my He was my dear friend from
Speaker 3: high school and he lived with me when we were
Speaker 3: in college. I don't really ol. He went to the
Speaker 3: Art Institute and so I'd hang out with him there
Speaker 3: all the time, you know. And but even my favorite
Speaker 3: aspects there at institute. It's the Renaissance and early Modern
Speaker 3: religious paintings and stuff, and just like and like that
Speaker 3: heroic realist style, the color saturation and the depiction of
Speaker 3: light and shadow. It's completely freaking insane, man that you know,
Speaker 3: and anybody even uh even even early twentieth century stuff
Speaker 3: that I like, you know, uh like Salvador Dali. His
Speaker 3: colors might pop better, but it's not the same sort
Speaker 3: of saturation. You know, I don't. I don't know when
Speaker 3: to about visual art. I remember it was Dil's hot,
Speaker 3: But I know what I like.
Speaker 1: Check out check out somebody named artist by the name
Speaker 1: of Ross Caliendo.
Speaker 3: Okay, it's spelled c A here.
Speaker 1: I'll spelled for you because I also suck at spelling
Speaker 1: h R O S S c A l I E
Speaker 1: n d O. And I think you will be it's
Speaker 1: very similar to what you're talking about. Yeah, he uses color.
Speaker 1: He uses color theory very very proficiently.
Speaker 3: Oh well, okay, now I'm a I I like to
Speaker 3: think I got a good eye for optics, Like I
Speaker 3: I think I'm good at like picking up clothes and stuff.
Speaker 3: And I think i'm I think I got a decent
Speaker 3: eye for like what's gonna parallel in terms of color schema.
Speaker 3: But I I'm very much like a words guy and
Speaker 3: a music guy. I can't draw for ship, you know. Uh,
Speaker 3: It's like it's the Jinks to the left. He's like
Speaker 3: left these other great artists, so they can't even draw
Speaker 3: stick figures. I'm like, I'm like one of the I
Speaker 3: to learn more about.
Speaker 2: I was a pretty good artist.
Speaker 1: Artist.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's I've always envy guys who can draw. But too,
Speaker 3: like everybody respects if you're a writer, people think you're
Speaker 3: a weirdo and probably an alcoholic or like a criminal,
Speaker 3: all of which made me true. If you're like an artist,
Speaker 3: the girls like want you to like paint them naked
Speaker 3: and stuff like, it's just there's just like way more
Speaker 3: like cloud behind it the uh I uh but no,
Speaker 3: I always I took when Burden was visiting Missus Burton's
Speaker 3: relatives and Andersonville, like, I took him to the Art
Speaker 3: Institute and we had a blast. He was really impressed, man,
Speaker 3: he really uh he really got to Uh.
Speaker 1: I got to sit in in Salvador Donelly's rolls Royce
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago.
Speaker 3: That's pretty awesome, Nick, Yeah, it was pretty fucking rad.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Ross Collendo, this is great stuff, man, Thanks for
Speaker 4: the tip.
Speaker 1: It's just the only it's the only modern artist. If
Speaker 1: you want to, if you want to buy a painting,
Speaker 1: I can hook you up with a good deal.
Speaker 3: Brushing up against people because you know, you know, like
Speaker 3: Picasso is a big deal in Chicago because of like
Speaker 3: the Picasso, which is like a fucking horrible sculpture, and
Speaker 3: like the starving. The Picasso was like a dickhead and
Speaker 3: hearns of his politics. Like I've always thought. I've always
Speaker 3: thought is I've always hated the Picasso. It's a piece
Speaker 3: of ship.
Speaker 1: And Passo himself was trash, Like I just had never
Speaker 1: gotten into it.
Speaker 3: I do love I do love the GM by Modern
Speaker 3: Lovers on the Real band such ridiculous. It was never
Speaker 3: cold an asshole, unlike you.
Speaker 1: Is a faggot.
Speaker 3: Yeah he really was.
Speaker 2: Can we can we go back to something that Thomas
Speaker 2: mentioned of course? Yeah, Thomas mentioned, you know, not being
Speaker 2: black pilled and everything like that. You three, you three
Speaker 2: know me in real life? Am I black pilled?
Speaker 1: Not at all?
Speaker 2: Okay?
Speaker 3: If you were like it wouldn't be friends because you
Speaker 3: like weirdo who like didn't like they're they're I mean,
Speaker 3: you're my friends and my friend, and you know I
Speaker 3: got I got everyone was my friend. I got like
Speaker 3: huge love for him. But I mean, but you'd be,
Speaker 3: you'd be it'd be like a detriment to hang out
Speaker 3: with you if you were a black old person like
Speaker 3: people like, toxic negativity is a real thing.
Speaker 1: People still come to do it.
Speaker 2: But apparently if you talk ship about the Grand Rabbi
Speaker 2: of Washington d C. Donald Trump and how much of
Speaker 2: a trader he is and he's not, he doesn't work
Speaker 2: for you know, America, that's black pilling, and you're going
Speaker 2: to black pill people.
Speaker 3: These these these fucking helons have They have no take.
Speaker 1: I mean, like I they can't conceptualize winning outside of
Speaker 1: winning presidential elections and owning the Republican Party, Like they
Speaker 1: physically can't conceptualize a worldview where the ship that is
Speaker 1: fucking them over it doesn't exist, like they're slaves exactly,
Speaker 1: their brains having slaved then yeah, I.
Speaker 2: Mean, I uh, they still think they still think like this,
Speaker 2: like this system somehow, if I get control of the
Speaker 2: reins of this obsolete system, I'm gonna make it work
Speaker 2: for me.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you're gonna pay all the black people their welfare benefits.
Speaker 2: Well, no, no, they're no, they're all going back. They're
Speaker 2: all going back, dude, They're all going back.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's it's uh, it's something like weird. It's it's
Speaker 3: something like weird. It's like playing video games with them.
Speaker 3: It's something like weird cathartic fantasy that for stupid people
Speaker 3: that that doesn't actually exist in reality, like I do all.
Speaker 3: But that's also the reason why you know, I tell
Speaker 3: people like I'm like, you know, look like if you're
Speaker 3: using social media and these online platforms and do what
Speaker 3: we're doing here. You know, we're to come together with people,
Speaker 3: you know, basically and have like what amouse, like a
Speaker 3: study session or you know, to bring people up to
Speaker 3: speed or like worthy of this kind of content. You know,
Speaker 3: I by it well at the same time, you know,
Speaker 3: augmenting your own knowledge base like that, that's a worthwhile
Speaker 3: use of time. Like beyond that what you're everything used
Speaker 3: to be doing, it's either uh, you know, worrying towards
Speaker 3: you know, the posterity of of your long form stuff
Speaker 3: or the stuff that's going to be enduring is going
Speaker 3: to serve you know, cadres that exceed us or you know,
Speaker 3: building uh social capital, and in real space, if you're
Speaker 3: not doing those things, you're you're just some guy like
Speaker 3: consuming memes and training bumper sticker platitudes with other idiots
Speaker 3: and you know, playing a video game. You know, like
Speaker 3: these guys, these guys don't actually exist in real space.
Speaker 3: You got a look at like that, you know, like
Speaker 3: they're not It's a it's there between a guy who
Speaker 3: is in some battle theater under fire and some guy
Speaker 3: who's like literally playing a video game, you know, and
Speaker 3: and the ladder trying to have a conversation with the
Speaker 3: former about the reality of a of a you know,
Speaker 3: modern warfare at like fire team level or something. You know,
Speaker 3: one thing is not gonna do with the other.
Speaker 2: I'm trying. I'm trying to figure out how they're all
Speaker 2: dealing with their pussies bleeding over the past week. When
Speaker 2: you know, Bovino comes out and says there are no
Speaker 2: deportations happening.
Speaker 1: Brings ever worked.
Speaker 2: Yeah, if it's a really or it's a really small number.
Speaker 2: And oh, by the way, there's like one hundred million
Speaker 2: illegals here. Everyone knows it. On the inside that there's
Speaker 2: one hundred million people who shouldn't be here, and it's
Speaker 2: like they're all going back. Many go ahead, go ahead,
Speaker 2: tell me, tell me how the fuck you're gonna do that. Well,
Speaker 2: we're gonna get our guy elected and he's gonna be
Speaker 2: like the Austrian painter and he's gonna shut the fuck up.
Speaker 1: Can you control Look at Virginia. Virginia told everybody, do
Speaker 1: you control how the elections are counted?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: Then elections mean nothing to.
Speaker 3: You, ding ding Well, so I mean anybody who I mean,
Speaker 3: like nobody should be voting. I mean this idea that
Speaker 3: it's al though too. I mean, like even these guys,
Speaker 3: these guys don't understand too. I mean, i'd points to
Speaker 3: have made a point to whiny Wignas. I'm like, if
Speaker 3: you guys actually like you would be the first to go.
Speaker 3: We'd have to like get rid of you because you're uh, yeah,
Speaker 3: you're you're because I mean, because you're white. In words
Speaker 3: number one, number two, it's uh you know again, if
Speaker 3: you think in terms of memes, like you know, you
Speaker 3: don't actually understand what you're saying. You have no idea
Speaker 3: what you're talking about. You know, like you're not.
Speaker 2: It's it's all Twitter posts. It's one.
Speaker 3: And yeah, like uh and and and and like and
Speaker 3: like bullshit they saw on four Chan.
Speaker 1: You know, I have I have a I have something
Speaker 1: I want to present to you. So my my British
Speaker 1: friend that you all know, she is very like hip
Speaker 1: to like the state of the art whatever in various
Speaker 1: social sciences, and she pulled up a study that apparently
Speaker 1: has been replicated a bunch of times. Because I obviously
Speaker 1: bitch about this a lot. For as much as it
Speaker 1: bothers Pete, it bothers me. How these fucking cocksuckers can
Speaker 1: just continue on it. And what she said to me was, well,
Speaker 1: and this to your point, Thomas, about how like it's
Speaker 1: something outside of intelligence, right, Intelligence in the IQ scale
Speaker 1: sense is different from having this political sense of things right,
Speaker 1: because the studies show like the more intelligence someone is right,
Speaker 1: the more that they will use that intelligence to basically
Speaker 1: twist themselves up into pretzels to preserve their worldview.
Speaker 3: So yeah, that makes sense.
Speaker 1: Increasing in intelligence doesn't actually make you able to basically
Speaker 1: decipher what's going on. You just use that intelligence more
Speaker 1: to figure out ways to basically to rationalize this to
Speaker 1: where it doesn't assault your worldview, to where it's not
Speaker 1: a threat to you. Right, the intelligence goes one hundred
Speaker 1: percent towards pain avoidance.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, there's a reason. There's a reason why it's
Speaker 3: it's it's not a bunch of like Stavant mathematicians who
Speaker 3: run everything. You know, Like I just make the point
Speaker 3: of people. I guarantee that like some like little worm
Speaker 3: like Bill Gates as a higher IQ than Napoleon or
Speaker 3: Muhammed or Adolf Hitler because also like not a single
Speaker 3: person on this planet who would ever die for Bill Gates,
Speaker 3: you know, like it doesn't like like IQ is a
Speaker 3: real thing. There's a set of characteristics and trades and measures,
Speaker 3: but it's a very it's a very narrow spectrum of
Speaker 3: human characteristics. Is that something like end all be all thing?
Speaker 3: You know what I think, I don't know why people.
Speaker 1: It is almost a spiritual sensitivity what we're talking about. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because that's actually what you're doing. You're picking up on
Speaker 1: basically the the the subconscious isn't real, but the collective
Speaker 1: conscious of the mass body of people that surround you. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's how you know what's coming down the pike. That's
Speaker 1: how you know what is possible and what's not is
Speaker 1: because you're basically.
Speaker 3: Doing Symbolic psychology is a real thing as long as
Speaker 3: why I like the Frank Herbert books because he was
Speaker 3: a big Carl jassperson and he was really into the
Speaker 3: the you know, bad psychology had a like before Charlatan's
Speaker 3: and idiots. Uh, it came to dominate the discipline and
Speaker 3: turn it into this grift and you know, first among them,
Speaker 3: you know, people like Freud. Before it became this like
Speaker 3: voodoo garbage, there was a lot of really insightful stuff
Speaker 3: being produced. And you know, I take that seriously. And yeah,
Speaker 3: symbolic psychology is a huge aspect of.
Speaker 1: Of a.
Speaker 3: Of a political ontology other things. Yeah, yeah, yeah, there's
Speaker 3: something to that. Not in the sense of ghost hunters
Speaker 3: and things, but you know, there are I saw the
Speaker 3: data burden on one of the ones we were recording about.
Speaker 3: That's why of the Herbert books, there's on a Planet
Speaker 3: of Rackets, there's a deck and and Carl Jung he
Speaker 3: towards out of his life ill a lot with with uh,
Speaker 3: not just tarot cards with but running the mittle playing cards.
Speaker 3: You know, they've had the conventional paint you know, face
Speaker 3: cards and visual stimulus that's you know, random within a
Speaker 3: certain data set, people will uh, not entirely consciously, like
Speaker 3: gravitate towards patterns that they associate in their mind symbolically
Speaker 3: with with other phenomena. And the more people gravitate to
Speaker 3: those things, presumably you can devinate certain aspects of you know,
Speaker 3: the the public mind. And uh, what's what you know,
Speaker 3: what aspects are being excited they're in in terms of extent,
Speaker 3: narratives and things like that. And I take that seriously.
Speaker 3: It's not it's not just mystical mumbo jumbo or something.
Speaker 3: But I uh, I'm gonna uh, I'm gonna balance because
Speaker 3: I'm not feeling well and I got to eat something.
Speaker 1: Get off my feet, my friend.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you guys, what's up?
Speaker 2: Take care? Good time?
Speaker 3: Yeah, thank Yeah, Well we'll catch up in the chat
Speaker 3: later today or something.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and let's uh, we'll try and make the next
Speaker 1: one a little bit sooner than three weeks so I
Speaker 1: don't get haranguing on on social media. Apparently one of
Speaker 1: the things social media is used for is.
Speaker 3: I'd like to ideal I'd like to do it bi weekly.
Speaker 3: But you guys, you guys, got demands on you was fine, Yeah,
Speaker 3: all right, fellas. Uh, let me know when this is posted,
Speaker 3: and please like tag me in the description, like add
Speaker 3: on substack when you upload it, like add my name
Speaker 3: as one of the creators that were automate get notified.
Speaker 1: Why am I not able to do this? Karl is
Speaker 1: the only one that subsect. Lets me add this too. Well,
Speaker 1: we'll take this offline. I will have one of you
Speaker 1: guys walk me through it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, thank you, all right, guys, all right later, all.
Speaker 1: Right, man, I think we should talk about respectability politics
Speaker 1: and the fact that all right, I was talking to
Speaker 1: our mutual mutual dark enlightenment about this a lot lately.
Speaker 1: All Right, I'd like to reference the Charlie Kirk assassination
Speaker 1: and what's happening now, because at the time of the
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk assassination, there was this this narrative that got
Speaker 1: seated into our space rather quickly and then became a
Speaker 1: like a means of forment. Right, Like if you tried
Speaker 1: to say this was Israel, you are a kook. That's
Speaker 1: just like Candace Owens, and you are helping the left.
Speaker 1: We believe it is Ross? Is that his name? Ross?
Speaker 1: Whatever it doesn't matter, right, this is who did it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna believe the FBI narrative. And if you try
Speaker 1: and say that it is Israel responsible or Israel involved
Speaker 1: in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, then you are not
Speaker 1: a serious person and you need to be pushed out
Speaker 1: of dissident right wing spaces and you're helping the left.
Speaker 1: And basically, Candace Owens and I did an audio essay
Speaker 1: about that about I title that walking and chewing gum
Speaker 1: at the same time, and which Tucker later went on
Speaker 1: to basically perform magically with Basically he's been doing that.
Speaker 2: He's been doing that a lot lately.
Speaker 1: Exactly what have been I've been quoting.
Speaker 2: I've been quoted almost directly in his newsletter a few
Speaker 2: times in the last couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: And I'm like saying, guys, come on his most recent
Speaker 1: interview today that dropped like there is three stormy waters
Speaker 1: like eats like each more each episode that he drops
Speaker 1: like more and more times. Can you like point like
Speaker 1: I said that I know where he got this, I
Speaker 1: know where he got this framing for this.
Speaker 2: Well, it's his producers, And Hi, guys, we love you.
Speaker 1: We love you. Very much, and you are allowed to
Speaker 1: steal all of the Stormy Waters takes you would like.
Speaker 1: Royalty free, Ben Shapiro, it is one million dollars per
Speaker 1: frame reference.
Speaker 4: If he starts talking about so, I'm gonna like really.
Speaker 1: Jump out of my chair started talking about.
Speaker 2: What about feats?
Speaker 4: I just did a big effort post about footwear and
Speaker 4: socks and stuff like that because I get a lot
Speaker 4: of questions about my kind of niche preferences because of
Speaker 4: my hiking and running experiences. And immediately people are like, uh,
Speaker 4: why didn't.
Speaker 2: You tell us the story about the foot fetishists that
Speaker 2: you met. I was like, look, here's the thing is,
Speaker 2: I don't know how you how I'm supposed to talk
Speaker 2: about the Charlie Kirk assassination very seriously, like the official story,
Speaker 2: all right? Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson's trans boyfriend's name is
Speaker 2: Lance Twigs. Lance Twigs a trans name, Lance Twigs. You're
Speaker 2: fucking with me, Okay, I can see you're fucking with me.
Speaker 2: I can see that this isn't real. Fucking stop it.
Speaker 2: There's no way a trans dude's name is Lance Twigs.
Speaker 2: That's made up. Come on, stop it.
Speaker 1: People. People think like Oh no, that's your your being,
Speaker 1: Like this is kook stuff. Case in point, the nine
Speaker 1: Iranian women or whatever that the regime is going to
Speaker 1: hang or something, right like, there's no the first person
Speaker 1: to post this is Eli Yakobi, right, No one of
Speaker 1: them is there.
Speaker 2: They're going to do this, right one of the Samuel's mom,
Speaker 2: Dommy's wife, and a wig.
Speaker 1: Yeah it's retarded. They made up nine women, and the
Speaker 1: fucking president of the United States, right, supposedly the most
Speaker 1: powerful man in the world is now begging the Iranian
Speaker 1: government to not kill nine made up bitches. It's nine
Speaker 1: not real hose guess what bared execution?
Speaker 2: They agreed to it?
Speaker 1: Of course they did, Like he wants to do what Yeah,
Speaker 1: sure will kill nine fake will will not kill nine
Speaker 1: not real people.
Speaker 3: For you?
Speaker 1: What do we get in the exchange? Oh my god?
Speaker 4: But it seems like a flex Like all this stuff
Speaker 4: seems like someone gloating, right, I mean it's it's so
Speaker 4: I mean, how.
Speaker 1: Many How hard do you work at your job?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: Like you need to tell me if this was your job,
Speaker 1: because there's thousands of people that are employed to create
Speaker 1: these type of meta narratives, right, Like, how hard are
Speaker 1: you gonna work. Nobody takes their job one hundred percent seriously.
Speaker 1: So you're telling me when you're you know, you're in
Speaker 1: the in the in the control room, typing up, you're like,
Speaker 1: all right, we got to think of a fucking true name,
Speaker 1: true name, true name, true name, true name. Twigs like
Speaker 1: you're gonna take You're gonna have some fun with it.
Speaker 1: It's like it's like the pilots that have to fly
Speaker 1: all day and then knowing that radar, radar, you know,
Speaker 1: flight control people watch them and they draw dicks in
Speaker 1: the sky. It's no different. But uh, the thing I
Speaker 1: wanted to get back to this because of Perci.
Speaker 2: It's all it's all look, you know to your point
Speaker 2: about you know, it's all this. If you criticize the administration,
Speaker 2: you're siding with the left. If you're doing look, man, yep,
Speaker 2: here's the problem. They know that scared little babies who
Speaker 2: think that the regime is going to come after them
Speaker 2: are going to vote Republican no matter what. Yep, yep.
Speaker 2: They've got them into that corner. And I'm not saying
Speaker 2: that you have to vote Democrat, okay, because that's the
Speaker 2: next thing still say, because because everyone has to have
Speaker 2: the Jewish argument of yeah, maybe you shouldn't be maybe
Speaker 2: you shouldn't be bombing Godza. Oh so you're promas So
Speaker 2: everybody jumps to that kind of argument because everybody's become
Speaker 2: so judaized the It's look, man, these people are not
Speaker 2: working for us, you know, And I think the proper
Speaker 2: you know, when they say, oh, who's the future of
Speaker 2: MAGA is a jd vance is now you are. You're
Speaker 2: the only one. You and your friends, You and the
Speaker 2: people you're getting together with, you and the people you're
Speaker 2: organizing with you and the people who you're looking to.
Speaker 2: You know, get your buddy elected sheriff of the county,
Speaker 2: or get a friend you know elected, try to get
Speaker 2: him into the governor's office or something like that. You're
Speaker 2: the future of making America great again. None of these.
Speaker 1: James Fishback James Fishback is the leading candidate for the
Speaker 1: governor of Florida. The leading candidate, Dan Bulzarian, is running
Speaker 1: for Congress and will likely win. James Fishback was an
Speaker 1: unemployed crazy person who's only cling to fame was working
Speaker 1: at a hedge fund for two weeks and then suing
Speaker 1: the hedge fund saying that they stole his trading ideas,
Speaker 1: like he's don't get me wrong, James Fishback is a
Speaker 1: pathological liar, Like he's not a good person, but he
Speaker 1: pulled out of his ass what will likely be a
Speaker 1: Republican governorship.
Speaker 2: Incredible. I don't think he's an only.
Speaker 1: Byron Daniel. Byron Daniels is the only person that that
Speaker 1: they have. I know this because I talked to the person.
Speaker 1: Remember when I talked to you, I told you, Remember
Speaker 1: I told you I talked to uh. I had a
Speaker 1: conversation with a boomer you know, important political person.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: This is what he's upset about. It's it's basically nobody
Speaker 1: vetted Byron Daniels, who's an absolute disaster as soon as
Speaker 1: you basically like look into him. Somehow he managed to
Speaker 1: fucking slink his way into Congress. And the problem is.
Speaker 2: It's it's it's Byron Donald's by the way, whatever, what a.
Speaker 4: PAC securer don Quavius Jenkins.
Speaker 1: Yes, but basically, like, what is your fucking excuse is
Speaker 1: is James Fishback doing respectability politics? Is James Fishback scared
Speaker 1: to say now that I think the Jews have enough power? Thanks?
Speaker 1: Or yeah, maybe we don't do stuff for Israel. Israel's
Speaker 1: the fucking worst. Like Israel's actually a detriment to our society.
Speaker 1: Our relationship with Israel hurts us. Right, we have guys
Speaker 1: on we have guys on our side thinking that they're
Speaker 1: doing respectability politics. So first I want to I'm gonna
Speaker 1: say this, and I'm gonna talk about what i want
Speaker 1: to say. Why why I'm not angry at them, because
Speaker 1: I'm not. If Tucker Carlson is breaking down the most
Speaker 1: popular media figure in America, Candae Owens, say whatever you want.
Speaker 1: She is the most popular podcaster in the fucking world,
Speaker 1: Like that's a fact. And Tucker Carlson is the most
Speaker 1: popular in America. And if he is breaking down to
Speaker 1: all of the people that watch him, how the Holocaust
Speaker 1: is the official religion of America has displaced Christianity, and
Speaker 1: the people that are responsible for this went about creating
Speaker 1: this situation intentionally. And it is the one thing you're
Speaker 1: not allowed to criticize. And it's the only thing the
Speaker 1: government is willing to come after you with force and
Speaker 1: try and disenfranchise you and or throw you in jail. Right,
Speaker 1: this is the thing you can't criticize. This is the
Speaker 1: most important. This is that is the crux of really
Speaker 1: all of art, like all of the dissident If you
Speaker 1: could like pick one idea that came out of our
Speaker 1: spheres that, if you were to chuck at the popular
Speaker 1: narrative would do the most damage. It's fucking Holocaustianity. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: that's it, Like Holocaust ain't fucking real. This is a religion, right,
Speaker 1: They're using it to displace Christianity and also control the
Speaker 1: minds of America and its political process. Like this is
Speaker 1: the one thing. And Tucker and it's been like the
Speaker 1: most like people that will say, like, oh, Jews are
Speaker 1: being bad even they won't touch the fucking Holocaust. And
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson is demystifying and taking all the power away
Speaker 1: from the Holocaust to the largest media audience that ever
Speaker 1: existed in the United States of America. And there's a
Speaker 1: lot of guys in our sphere that are just afraid
Speaker 1: to be like, yeah, well the Jews did it. It's
Speaker 1: it's a fucking Jews. Sorry, you're not allowed to say that.
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk was assassinated by Jews. Charlie Kirk was assassinated
Speaker 1: by Jews. You know, I'd say that if you do that,
Speaker 1: you're helping, You're helping the left, and you sound like
Speaker 1: a kuk I'm sorry, Stucker, Carlson a kuk. No, what
Speaker 1: he's doing is legitimizing these ideas, and our guys are
Speaker 1: missing the fucking moment. James Fishback's not missing the moment, right,
Speaker 1: A fucking pathological liar and probably psychotic person that he
Speaker 1: may be, He's not missing the moment. He's doing the
Speaker 1: thing that half of the guys in our sphere tell
Speaker 1: us that Normanies aren't ready for. To Thomas's point, these
Speaker 1: guys are so fucking online and up their own ass
Speaker 1: that they don't actually talk to regular people. They don't
Speaker 1: know what the regular person is ready for or not.
Speaker 1: Tucker does. So I'm not angry if you're listening to
Speaker 1: this and this sounds like you or you were one
Speaker 1: of the people that told me, told carl or told
Speaker 1: Pete that we were helping the left. We need to
Speaker 1: be pushed out of distance spaces because we're saying the
Speaker 1: Jews killed Charlie Kirk Well, motherfucker. First off, we were right, haha.
Speaker 1: And second off, like you are, there has something has
Speaker 1: interrupted your ability to perceive what regular Americans are willing
Speaker 1: to take and what answers Americans are looking for. And
Speaker 1: this is a fucking thing that we are going this
Speaker 1: respectability politics stuff like this whole narrative about Charlie Kurk
Speaker 1: getting killed by Jews. This is gonna help, This is
Speaker 1: gonna hurt the left, This is gonna help the left,
Speaker 1: This is gonna we only have this small window of
Speaker 1: time we have to do this in. We have to
Speaker 1: point it at this. Don't be a kook Like that
Speaker 1: message went out everywhere. Just like the second the SPLC
Speaker 1: thing went out, this other narrative immediately came down about
Speaker 1: how all white advocacy organizations are just fedops. Like we've
Speaker 1: seen it everywhere. This type of narrative manipulation is going
Speaker 1: to hit our spheres really really hard because and this
Speaker 1: is the same reason why I'm not mad. There are guys,
Speaker 1: a lot of guys you know him, carl you know them,
Speaker 1: We've seen them at meetups, right, Like, there's a lot
Speaker 1: of guys that have threw no fault of their own,
Speaker 1: haven't really been given a chance to do anything right
Speaker 1: that they can feel accomplished about. Right, They're guys that
Speaker 1: are you know in their early twenties. They're doing all
Speaker 1: the right things, like they're the eagle Scout kids, like
Speaker 1: there are guys, right, they're the guys that are stand
Speaker 1: up dudes, But our society has removed from them any
Speaker 1: chance of recognition that they are men, right, like they're
Speaker 1: There's no method, there's no mechanism in our society that
Speaker 1: allows these guys, especially because their age, especially because what
Speaker 1: our society has basically chosen how it's going to treat men. Right,
Speaker 1: these guys are doing all the right things. They're trying
Speaker 1: to be buttoned up, they're trying to be stand up guys,
Speaker 1: and nothing exists to where they can basically earn the
Speaker 1: respect of other men. They can't. They're unable to get
Speaker 1: recognized as respectable guys.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: They're any way of doing that through employement or education, right,
Speaker 1: or entrepreneurial accomplishments, those have all been denied them, right.
Speaker 1: The type of social organizations and religious organizations that would
Speaker 1: confer that type of stuff, that's all been denied them.
Speaker 1: So they have no way of getting respectability. And if
Speaker 1: you're twenty, if you're in your early twenties, there is
Speaker 1: nothing you want more than the recognition of other men
Speaker 1: that you are a man. And because of this, we
Speaker 1: are going to a large percentage of our guys are
Speaker 1: going to be fucking susceptible to this respectability bullshit every
Speaker 1: single time. Take it away.
Speaker 2: What are your thoughts, good, carl.
Speaker 4: I totally get what you mean, And because we really
Speaker 4: need all kinds like people serve. People serve different roles,
Speaker 4: like people reach people at different stages along the way.
Speaker 4: So I understand some of these arguments for them. But
Speaker 4: what you're pointing out, Stormy, which is the killer point,
Speaker 4: is that these people determine that they are the respectability
Speaker 4: police because they want to be respected and they want
Speaker 4: to be respectable, And like, no, that's not how this works.
Speaker 4: That you know, you need you need to you need
Speaker 4: to understand reality, and you need to explore things, and
Speaker 4: sometimes you'll be like, yeah, the official story is closer
Speaker 4: to what I think is probably the truth. I mean,
Speaker 4: I think we were all kind of like with the
Speaker 4: Charlie Kirk thing, at first, we're kind of like, well,
Speaker 4: you know, let's see how this plays out. I can't
Speaker 4: make a make a proclamation yet. But then there's enough
Speaker 4: compelling evidence, you know, that comes out where you're like,
Speaker 4: holy shit, and yeah, so it's it's an interesting it's
Speaker 4: an interesting quandary because you know, we have to find
Speaker 4: ways for these people to do things in real life
Speaker 4: that matter. And like, that's literally the most important thing
Speaker 4: that I could say about anything is that if you
Speaker 4: get together with guys, you don't have the misunderstandings when
Speaker 4: you're talking face to face that you have online. Just
Speaker 4: inherently it's just inherently siloing and alienating and leads to
Speaker 4: conflict and so on and so forth. And so that's
Speaker 4: really what the answer is, you know, and it sucks
Speaker 4: because like you want to reach these people, but you know,
Speaker 4: a lot of people just can't be helped. So hopefully,
Speaker 4: hopefully these people are developing cadres of people I r
Speaker 4: L and they can hash it out there and they
Speaker 4: don't need to be performative online and the thought police
Speaker 4: for their enemies on behalf of they're.
Speaker 1: They're they're generally I see this from the digging around
Speaker 1: that I've done is like all it really takes is
Speaker 1: like for some person in the system, like let's say
Speaker 1: a a congressional staffer or something like that, because we
Speaker 1: we do interface right, Like it's a spectrum. So our
Speaker 1: guys are like us to where they're just completely disengaged.
Speaker 1: And then there are guys that are still involved, right
Speaker 1: Like they're still mentally art gives, but they are in
Speaker 1: the machine. Yeah, And it's just it's very easy for
Speaker 1: somebody with a little bit of clout, right, somebody with
Speaker 1: that respect to where they can believably confer some of
Speaker 1: that and be like, hey, man, like I agree with
Speaker 1: everything you're saying, Like, hey, if you could just tone
Speaker 1: it down about like the Jews and this Charlie Kirk
Speaker 1: thing right now, because it seemed to be time sensitive
Speaker 1: and it's imperative, right Like, it's the one thing that
Speaker 1: it kind of dominated the narrative. I would say, like
Speaker 1: all of regime efforts in our space, because I don't
Speaker 1: get me wrong, Like, guys, there's a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: guys you can think of off the top of your
Speaker 1: head that are just regime spigots, but that somehow exists
Speaker 1: in our spheres. Right, All those guys all at once
Speaker 1: were like, you can't say the Jews killed Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 1: You can't say Jews killed Charlie Kirk. And that in
Speaker 1: that moment where our guys can't really decide like what
Speaker 1: to do. All it takes is just a little nudge
Speaker 1: from someone that they view as respectable. Right, It doesn't
Speaker 1: have to be a tacit prompt our guys lack. A
Speaker 1: lot of guys lack things, experience accomplishments that they can
Speaker 1: stand on their own two feet and say fuck you,
Speaker 1: like I don't care what you think. Like that's nice,
Speaker 1: but like I don't need anything from you. There's nothing
Speaker 1: the system can give me. Where do you think, Pete, Well.
Speaker 2: I mean I've been saying this. It's the whole respectability thing,
Speaker 2: you know. People. Yeah, I know I've been saying this
Speaker 2: and people are probably really sick of me hearing me
Speaker 2: say this. But I'll never be thinking of it if
Speaker 2: you're going to go if you're going to join the GOP. Now,
Speaker 2: I can understand on the local level, state level, that's
Speaker 2: where we want to work. But the national GOP, Washington,
Speaker 2: d C. The GOP is gay as fuck. Okay I
Speaker 2: think it was.
Speaker 1: It was, and they're trying to fucking root you out
Speaker 1: if you didn't attend dinner. Yeah.
Speaker 2: One of my friend, you know, one of my friends. Yeah,
Speaker 2: one of my friends said it this way, he said.
Speaker 2: The Democrat Party promotes homosexuality, the Republican Party practices it.
Speaker 1: So you're going you you go to.
Speaker 2: Washington, d C. And I'm gonna I'm gonna infiltrate, and
Speaker 2: I'm gonna you're gonna be working side by side with sodomites,
Speaker 2: probably child molesters. I mean, you're you're telling me that's
Speaker 2: not going that's not going to hurt you in some way,
Speaker 2: shape or form spiritually. I mean, you you think you're
Speaker 2: doing the right thing, but you've basically just you. You've
Speaker 2: gone to sodom and Gomorrah, and there is not like
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, you think you're the one person who who
Speaker 2: God is going to look upon and go okay, okay,
Speaker 2: we'll save it because there's one upright man here. Now
Speaker 2: that ship is sailed a long fucking time ago. Get
Speaker 2: out because it is going to be destroyed, and if
Speaker 2: it's not destroyed, it's going to destroy you. And these
Speaker 2: people who are like, oh well I need you know,
Speaker 2: I get in there, you know, And I mean I
Speaker 2: can have a career. I can really, I can really
Speaker 2: make change. I can really What did you stop the
Speaker 2: did you stop the bombing in Iran. Did you stop
Speaker 2: the one last June? Did you stop February twenty eighth.
Speaker 2: Are you getting the are you getting mass deports? What
Speaker 2: are you doing?
Speaker 1: What you? Yeah?
Speaker 2: I mean if Joe Kent is like the head of
Speaker 2: like this, I mean Robert F. Kennedy is starting a
Speaker 2: podcast because he says he can basically influence the do
Speaker 2: more in the world with his podcast than he ken
Speaker 2: as the head of whatever. I can't remember what fucking
Speaker 2: agency he had as.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like the system is not The system is
Speaker 2: designed so that one group, one small group, can or
Speaker 2: competing groups can can take control and have control of it.
Speaker 2: But it's turned out that just one group has control
Speaker 2: of it, and they're set. They're basically initiating wars, and
Speaker 2: they're saying, no, you can't do deportations. But no, you're
Speaker 2: gonna go there and as a staffer and as a clerk,
Speaker 2: you're going to change everything. Oh no, I'm going to
Speaker 2: implant myself there because because the regime is going to
Speaker 2: fail one day and I need to be here so
Speaker 2: that I can take shut the fuck up and get out,
Speaker 2: go back to your whatever state you're from, to your
Speaker 2: local area, and take the knowledge you've learned there and
Speaker 2: start working there. That's the way this works. That is,
Speaker 2: it is not going to change. It may as well
Speaker 2: that you may as well call Washington, DC tel Aviv
Speaker 2: now because running by tel Aviv it's most Yeah, it's
Speaker 2: going to die, but we don't know when yea. And
Speaker 2: people are like, well, you know, it's an interurger generational war,
Speaker 2: which I agree. So we need to intergenerationally insert ourselves
Speaker 2: into there and make our own deep state. You said
Speaker 2: that by the time you do that, it's going to
Speaker 2: it's it's already an anachronism. It's not going to work
Speaker 2: at that point. It's going to get to a point
Speaker 2: where it doesn't work.
Speaker 1: And now you're middle aged with a mortgage and need
Speaker 1: the gig.
Speaker 2: Yeah, everybody who thinks is like, oh, I'm going to
Speaker 2: go there, and I'm going to show you know how
Speaker 2: many people have gone. I mean, I remember back in
Speaker 2: like twenty eighteen, this guy contacted me. He is like, dude,
Speaker 2: I work at the biggest, one of the biggest lobby
Speaker 2: lobby and agencies in DC. Can I come on the
Speaker 2: show and talk? And he talked about his origin story.
Speaker 2: His origin story was he was working with a guy
Speaker 2: in Texas. He was working on his campaign and the
Speaker 2: guy ran as Ron Paul to get elected. And then
Speaker 2: when he got to DC, what did he do? He
Speaker 2: immediately reverted to becoming one of them. So this guy
Speaker 2: was like, well shit, I mean I'm here. I don't
Speaker 2: want to work on the hill because I'm not going
Speaker 2: to make any money. I've made some contacts along the way.
Speaker 2: Let me make some money by going to work for
Speaker 2: a lobbying group. And he went to work for a
Speaker 2: lobbying group, and he just came on the show and said,
Speaker 2: you know, and basically expose what's happening. Thomas Massey actually
Speaker 2: listened to that episode and said it was one of
Speaker 2: the best episodes of the podcast you ever heard because
Speaker 2: it explained how Washington works exactly perfectly. Well, how do
Speaker 2: you think you're going to go there and change? And
Speaker 2: how do you think you're going to go What are
Speaker 2: you going to go there and set up so that
Speaker 2: when it collapses you can take over? What are you
Speaker 2: going to take over? The only thing you have control
Speaker 2: over is where you are, and DC is not your home.
Speaker 2: Go home, go home and start working there. There's people
Speaker 2: there even care about. You can take care of the
Speaker 2: people you care about better by working within a one
Speaker 2: hundred mile radius of your home, then you can going
Speaker 2: to fucking Tel Aviv on the Potomac.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is a credibility thing. This is why I
Speaker 1: think it's hilarious that all the fucking Indians, the new arrivals,
Speaker 1: are clamoring for positions just like the Jews did in
Speaker 1: the existing apparatus. They don't actually like, they're not creative
Speaker 1: or intelligent people, right, so they can only see what exists. Right, Like,
Speaker 1: from an investors standpoint, this is a crowded trade. You
Speaker 1: already know it's not the play anymore because everyone is
Speaker 1: piling into it, right. That tells you that it's that's
Speaker 1: not where it's going to be. And that's exactly what
Speaker 1: they're doing, right, So, like they don't realize that the
Speaker 1: thing is rapidly like they can't see where it is going.
Speaker 1: They can only see where it is. It's like, oh, well,
Speaker 1: this is the halls of power. This is how you
Speaker 1: get power. And they don't actually probably because they haven't
Speaker 1: been here very long. They can't see the diminishing, rapidly
Speaker 1: diminishing credibility of the system. Governments don't need militaries, governments
Speaker 1: don't need internal police forces. All these things are secondary
Speaker 1: to credibility.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Once credibility is lost, none of those other systems function, right.
Speaker 1: Those are secondary systems that exist to protect the credibility.
Speaker 1: And this is something I've been thinking about a lot, guys.
Speaker 1: It is the kind of like the black hole nature
Speaker 1: of credibility. And the Jews are going through this right now.
Speaker 1: Trump is going through this right now. Right, once in
Speaker 1: a black hole. It's kind of interesting. Once you pass
Speaker 1: what's called the event horizon, right, which is like the
Speaker 1: apex point, right, The laws of physics literally flip, right,
Speaker 1: It's like the relationship between the fundamental forces flip. So
Speaker 1: when you cross the credibility event horizon, every single action
Speaker 1: can only go the opposite direction. Right, So, once you
Speaker 1: pass the credibility horizon, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 3: What you do.
Speaker 1: Things that would generally gain you credibility now have the
Speaker 1: opposite effect. They take it away. Right. So the things
Speaker 1: Trump does to try and regain credibility, because he has
Speaker 1: passed that credibility point, all they do is diminish his credibility.
Speaker 1: And I'll I'll dumb it down really simple. The day
Speaker 1: before yesterday Captive Dreamer, that fucking peanut head.
Speaker 2: Faggot was he's a white Somali.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he fucking is, isn't he.
Speaker 2: He's a white Somali literally.
Speaker 1: Someone so ugly your dad wants nothing to do with you. Ah, slave,
Speaker 1: he is a fucking slave.
Speaker 3: But he thought.
Speaker 1: In me criticizing this SPLC DJ and indictment, which is
Speaker 1: not something like, yeah, you can celebrate it, cool, but
Speaker 1: if you're not concerned with the particular thing that they
Speaker 1: went after the SPLC for, then you might not understand
Speaker 1: what's going on. But anyways, he tried to insinuate that
Speaker 1: I am a paid SPLC agent. Right, the SBLCS defunct
Speaker 1: all the Jewish leadership, like they all left, there's nobody there.
Speaker 4: It's a ghost, it's a it's a it's it was
Speaker 4: a skeleton that money was still passing through, but it
Speaker 4: hasn't been anything exactly.
Speaker 1: But what did they what did they go after it
Speaker 1: for white supremacy organs, funding of white supremacy organizations and
Speaker 1: they're saying that that's funding of terrorism. Well that's interesting.
Speaker 1: So basically giving money to white advocacy organizations is a crime, okay,
Speaker 1: But uh, Captive Dreamer, you know, basically quote tweets me
Speaker 1: and he's like, oh, well, you know these is obviously
Speaker 1: a paid s PLC agent. D da da da. And
Speaker 1: I was like, man, like, nigga, you're the guy that
Speaker 1: gets paid by Israel to post ship Like what are
Speaker 1: you even saying? And I got him a little flustered,
Speaker 1: and he uh, He's like yeah, so well yeah, so
Speaker 1: I put I put the on those anti condemning anti
Speaker 1: Semitism posts that they were paid promotions. Right, I got
Speaker 1: paid by Israel. How come you won't put in your
Speaker 1: posts that you're paid by the SPLC. It's like, whoa
Speaker 1: you were what?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: I was just joking. I was just joking about being.
Speaker 2: Paid clod cloud nose on, clowd nose off. That's what
Speaker 2: they all do.
Speaker 1: Oh no, exactly, I was kidding exactly. But if everyone
Speaker 1: already thinks that you're paid Israel shill, then that joke
Speaker 1: actually doesn't work. It becomes counter effective. Right, So if
Speaker 1: I say, hey, guys, I'm paid by Israel, because that's
Speaker 1: such an outlandish possibility, that joke is funny. But now
Speaker 1: somebody else can make the exact same joke, and it's
Speaker 1: not funny. It actually further condemns them as a paid
Speaker 1: to show captive. Dreamer has passed the credibility event horizon.
Speaker 1: Nothing he does to try and gain credibility back works.
Speaker 1: It always just backfires. Everything the Trump administration does to
Speaker 1: try and gain credibility back ends up backfiring because once
Speaker 1: you pass that point, you simply acting at all brings
Speaker 1: eyeballs to you. Right, So like this is like the
Speaker 1: whole thing with them trying to distract away from the
Speaker 1: war and Iran right by making a big deal out
Speaker 1: of nothings at home. Well, see that's a problem. Like, yes,
Speaker 1: you want to take away eyeballs from your fuck up
Speaker 1: and Iran, but the problem is is that because you
Speaker 1: have absolutely no credibility, those eyeballs are going to find
Speaker 1: other stuff that you're not gonna want. Because if everybody's like,
Speaker 1: oh well Trump's fucking controlled by choose whatever, I'm bored
Speaker 1: of Iran, where am I going to look? And now
Speaker 1: all of a sudden everyone is finding out how much
Speaker 1: money him and his family have been making. Nobody was
Speaker 1: paying attention to that before, right, Nobody was even noticing
Speaker 1: really that Trump corruption on the right until he had
Speaker 1: lost that credibility to where Now, when our eyeballs are
Speaker 1: focused away from the thing that you don't want us
Speaker 1: looking at, where do you think we're going to go?
Speaker 1: And this is a problem with the regime. Everything it
Speaker 1: does right reduces its credibility. It's losing legitimacy rapidly. So
Speaker 1: you trying to embed yourself into this thing so you
Speaker 1: can be there when it collapses. What so you can
Speaker 1: take it over? Like you're gonna take over a thing
Speaker 1: that nobody finds credible anymore. Right, Like you're gonna it's
Speaker 1: like taking over the SPLC. Oh, you took over the SPO.
Speaker 1: You embedded yourself in the SPLC. Well cool, Now nobody
Speaker 1: gives a shit about the SBLC. Looks like you spent
Speaker 1: all that time for nothing, Right, Like you're going to
Speaker 1: take control of a thing that nobody fucking likes anymore.
Speaker 1: It just it drives me nutspeed.
Speaker 4: You know, there's one positive to I generally, I generally
Speaker 4: feel like the SPLC thing uh is is generally positive
Speaker 4: in terms of how it can move the needle forward
Speaker 4: as long as people spend two to three minutes thinking
Speaker 4: about it and the people and we talk to people
Speaker 4: who can be reached, not retards, but people who can
Speaker 4: be reached. There's no point in trying to convince retards
Speaker 4: online of anything. It's it's explaining the criticality of the
Speaker 4: s plc's role, you know, in Zog essentially in moving
Speaker 4: the neat needle forward in terms of uh, you know,
Speaker 4: creating justifications for various things. You know, they were at
Speaker 4: Eloheim City and their own operatives were basically running the
Speaker 4: op that led to the Oklahoma City bombing right there's
Speaker 4: and the FBI was, you know, running things through there.
Speaker 4: Oh wow, the FBI went after the SBLC like that's
Speaker 4: that's pretty comical. But the value in it is the
Speaker 4: proof retroactively and as far as what they were actually
Speaker 4: doing our heads actually that need to roll actually rollings
Speaker 4: related to this, no, not at all, but it's documented
Speaker 4: evidence as to what they actually are, and it isn't
Speaker 4: of course, the retard explanation that we're seeing from again
Speaker 4: retards who are irrelevant and the people who believe it
Speaker 4: are generally irrelevant people you know or you know, particularly
Speaker 4: over seventy five.
Speaker 2: Is the whole deal with.
Speaker 4: You know, you know, just proving that this is the
Speaker 4: way that they operate and mapping it to now right,
Speaker 4: so here here, let me give an example if you
Speaker 4: were online engaging in any of the politics associated with
Speaker 4: kind of this area in the past, I want to
Speaker 4: say since probably about two thousand. Well a lot of
Speaker 4: it goes back to just after nine eleven, but certain
Speaker 4: aspects of it, it really didn't start ramping up until
Speaker 4: around twenty twelve, but.
Speaker 2: Ten years ago.
Speaker 4: Definitely, if you were on like if you were on
Speaker 4: gab or something like that, you were constantly dealing with
Speaker 4: SPLC people literally people who were branded like Michael E.
Speaker 4: Hayden and that CARLSS Loser and you know, shit bags
Speaker 4: like that, as well as people who are undercover agitators
Speaker 4: who were looking basically looking to get information on people
Speaker 4: internally so that they could turn people. They were trying
Speaker 4: to get people to click links so that they kind
Speaker 4: of id them, you know, get their you know, their
Speaker 4: Google IDs by having them click through to documents and
Speaker 4: stuff like that and then being able to tie it
Speaker 4: back to gab for example. And so they've operated this
Speaker 4: way for a really long time. Yeah, they blew up whatever,
Speaker 4: and it isn't that they were manufacturing like quote unquote racism,
Speaker 4: And in reality, it's like the Democrats, the Democrats, you
Speaker 4: have to manufacture racism, you know, just like the way
Speaker 4: that the KKK.
Speaker 2: Is a Democrat thing. We know that that's retarded.
Speaker 4: But the value of all this is in being able
Speaker 4: to prove that it's all in op and that what
Speaker 4: happens is it's basically illegal to organize as a white
Speaker 4: person in your own interests. And and unless you like
Speaker 4: do all the denials and you put your you know,
Speaker 4: Earl Winson Sears or whatever her stupid name is, you know,
Speaker 4: as your candidate, you have to constantly sell out or
Speaker 4: you're under attack. And how are you under attack by
Speaker 4: law enforcement who and informants and NGOs and the five
Speaker 4: Eyes intelligence organizations who will send people out you know,
Speaker 4: on loan to your your various NGOs. So you have
Speaker 4: German intelligence, you know, trying to run in these things
Speaker 4: you know, paid for by the SPLC.
Speaker 2: Among others, which we know about.
Speaker 4: And they're trying to entrap you, trying to get you
Speaker 4: to commit a crime and trying to turn you or
Speaker 4: to find a retard in your organization who will just
Speaker 4: take money. But it's usually associated with entrapment and things
Speaker 4: of that nature so that they can steer your organizations
Speaker 4: so that you know, Charlottesville, right, Charlottesville was a legitimate thing.
Speaker 4: People did not want the monuments to come down, and
Speaker 4: they wanted to literally just be able to talk about it,
Speaker 4: Like all they ever wanted to do is be able
Speaker 4: to talk about, Hey, this is what's going on, and
Speaker 4: we don't want this to happen. Well, you know what happens.
Speaker 4: The whole world moves to stop that from happening and
Speaker 4: try to turn it into a precipitating event that will
Speaker 4: allow them to crush the right forever and blame it
Speaker 4: on you know, quote unquote fringe people. And and so
Speaker 4: what they do is they they take over these organizations
Speaker 4: to entrap people. It isn't that nobody is interested in,
Speaker 4: you know, speaking up for themselves. It isn't because well,
Speaker 4: I'm are racists, so I want to join a racist organization. No,
Speaker 4: you want to be able to assert your rights, and
Speaker 4: you can't do that. And so when you try to
Speaker 4: do that, they try to stop you. It really doesn't
Speaker 4: take that long to explain it to people, and most
Speaker 4: people understand it. People have been around for twenty thirty
Speaker 4: years understand this. People have just started figuring it out.
Speaker 4: Can be can learn to understand this with very short conversations.
Speaker 4: So that's just me going through like it's not as bad,
Speaker 4: and we see these stupid narratives, but don't believe out
Speaker 4: there that many.
Speaker 2: People actually believe this.
Speaker 4: The people that are putting this out there, they're a
Speaker 4: tiny minority of retards who are repeating it or they're
Speaker 4: paid shills.
Speaker 1: Well, I think it's obvious, go ahead.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean I think there are people that are
Speaker 2: just absolutely diluted and still think that the system works.
Speaker 2: That's fair, that's fair. Yeah, And those are the ones
Speaker 2: I'm trying to talk to. I know, I don't do
Speaker 2: a really good job because I'm not very diplomatic, but
Speaker 2: I'm to talk to the people who still are like
Speaker 2: holding on to this, you know, two hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: year old civic religion that you know, maybe we can
Speaker 2: get back to the constitution one day or something like that.
Speaker 2: And it's like, you know, and we're going to have
Speaker 2: mass deportations and the country is going to be completely bright,
Speaker 2: you know, just white people and just Protestants and only
Speaker 2: Protestants from my denomination. It's like, guys, look, you have
Speaker 2: to deal with reality. This is why people get pissed
Speaker 2: off at Daryl. You know Darryl Cooper, all right, Darryl
Speaker 2: Cooper has a bleeding heart for a lot of things,
Speaker 2: and he's explained why, and I accept it. To me,
Speaker 2: Darryl understands the biggest problem that we have, and that's
Speaker 2: that's important for me. But when Daryl, when you see
Speaker 2: Darryl talking about when you see Daryl talking about the
Speaker 2: like immigration and stuff like that and how send out
Speaker 2: ice like like they did in Minneapolis, is just it's
Speaker 2: a boring. One of the reasons he's saying that is
Speaker 2: because that's not how you solve this problem. And he
Speaker 2: also doesn't think that this problem is going to be solved,
Speaker 2: and he's probably right. I mean, we're going through it again,
Speaker 2: aren't we. Donald Trump in the White House, has the House,
Speaker 2: has the Senate, and he basically went to work for
Speaker 2: the Jews. So who's going to be who's going to
Speaker 2: do the deportations? Is JD Van's going to do the
Speaker 2: deportations when you get when he gets here in two
Speaker 2: thousand and eight, in twenty twenty eight, he probably won't
Speaker 2: even be elected because he's in this administration. So who's
Speaker 2: going to do that? Who's how is he getting done?
Speaker 2: So it's like you know when people you know, shit
Speaker 2: on Daryl Darrel's just like, look, I'm trying to figure
Speaker 2: out how to deal with this, with the reality of
Speaker 2: what it is, not this whole like libertarian antacy of
Speaker 2: living in an capistan in your head that you know,
Speaker 2: I phrase I coined, and where you're you're like, you're
Speaker 2: living your life now and all of your decisions and
Speaker 2: everything that you think is being based upon the world
Speaker 2: you want to see and not how the world works,
Speaker 2: like how the world works right now. Sure you want
Speaker 2: to plan for the future, and you'd like to see this,
Speaker 2: and you'd like to see that, but I can fucking
Speaker 2: guarantee you the world you want that you're picturing in
Speaker 2: your head is not going to happen. It is not
Speaker 2: going to happen.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: You may be able to set up your personal life
Speaker 2: in a way that you can live as free as
Speaker 2: you'd want, but if you're gonna be if you think
Speaker 2: you're going to look out at the world the way
Speaker 2: it is right now and somehow by you believing in
Speaker 2: some kind of utopian dream that you're going to get it,
Speaker 2: or you know, well, maybe if there weren't black pillars
Speaker 2: out there, we could will it into existence while we're
Speaker 2: just posting on Twitter. Okay, I think you need to
Speaker 2: wake up. I think you need to figure out you know,
Speaker 2: you need to figure out your own life first. I mean,
Speaker 2: I think people have this idea that I'm like black pilled,
Speaker 2: that like I live my life in a black pilled way. No,
Speaker 2: I don't live my life in a black pilled way
Speaker 2: at all. I like my life. I really like my life.
Speaker 2: I think politics as people who I know and that
Speaker 2: I trust and that I work with wanted to work
Speaker 2: is not going to happen. So why would I pretend
Speaker 2: that something is going to happen that isn't that I
Speaker 2: don't believe is going to happen, just so that you
Speaker 2: feel good, just so that you don't feel black pilled,
Speaker 2: just so that you can sit there and keep imagining
Speaker 2: that the world is going to be something that it's
Speaker 2: not going to be. I'm sorry, that's not who I am,
Speaker 2: you know, and if you thought that's who I was,
Speaker 2: you shouldn't have got on board. You know me, You
Speaker 2: hear the way I talk, You know my opinions. You know,
Speaker 2: I think that this is occupied that this government is occupied,
Speaker 2: and the only way it's not going to be occupied
Speaker 2: anymore is if it's going to have to fall apart.
Speaker 2: It's going to have to stop existing as it does.
Speaker 2: So that it because it was designed in a way
Speaker 2: that occupiers could occupy it and take over, and that
Speaker 2: is democracy and that needs to be destroyed. And that
Speaker 2: is the only way that this government, the way it
Speaker 2: is structured right now, can operate. So stop living in
Speaker 2: a fantasy world thinking that you're going to make it
Speaker 2: into something that it is that it's not going to be.
Speaker 2: That's not black pilling. That's just accepting reality. And if
Speaker 2: you think that's black pilling, then you're a Pollyanna faggot
Speaker 2: and I probably don't want to have anything to do
Speaker 2: with you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Literally, none of the voting machines are real. So
Speaker 1: like the system has to go. I think it'll go
Speaker 1: a lot faster than other people in our sphere, just
Speaker 1: because these things tend to cascade. Yes, So if it
Speaker 1: starts going a little bit, it starts going a little
Speaker 1: bit faster. If it starts going a little bit faster,
Speaker 1: it starts going faster. Still, And where are you going
Speaker 1: to be right if you're doing the thing that Pete's
Speaker 1: pointing out, trying to will it into existence without having
Speaker 1: sorted yourself out. You're just as fucked as everyone else. Now,
Speaker 1: somebody's got to come and sort you out. I'll do
Speaker 1: the immigration, immigration, the immigration issue, right, Like Daryl Cooper
Speaker 1: is also not asking to be the one setting up
Speaker 1: our immigration policy. He'll be the first to tell you
Speaker 1: he's a bit of a bleeding heart squishy when it
Speaker 1: comes to that issue. Right, that issue is going to
Speaker 1: sort itself out. A vast majority of the people are
Speaker 1: going to leave because the government's going to have collapsed.
Speaker 1: And I know this is something that you're just basically
Speaker 1: saying that this impossible thing is going to happen. So
Speaker 1: the thing that's been around for the last seventy years,
Speaker 1: eighty years, because the government that we have now is
Speaker 1: not the government we had before World War Two, like
Speaker 1: literally not even close, doesn't even resemble it. It's a
Speaker 1: different thing.
Speaker 2: They're literally fighting for the New Deal regime to keep
Speaker 2: the New Deals exactly.
Speaker 1: And I tell you that it's going to be around
Speaker 1: for forever and that'll never collapse. Like, really, this little
Speaker 1: we have a welfare system that lets us pretend to vote, like,
Speaker 1: that's actually the thing that exists. So you think this
Speaker 1: fucking shit show is going to be able to continue
Speaker 1: to pay all of its gibs while it's eroding rapidly.
Speaker 1: It's capital based. Okay, Sure, that issue is going to
Speaker 1: sort itself out, and it's probably unfortunately for Darryl, who
Speaker 1: you know is cares about people deeply in lots of respects,
Speaker 1: it's and he probably will be the first to agree
Speaker 1: with me and that it's not a good thing. That
Speaker 1: it will probably resolve itself violently, as these things always do.
Speaker 1: So the immigration issue is for us to sort out
Speaker 1: at the time in which we can sort it out.
Speaker 1: So in that way, I very much agree with Darryl,
Speaker 1: Like this government is not going to do it. They've
Speaker 1: fucking straight up told you they're not going to do it.
Speaker 1: So when we kind of end, the regime kind of
Speaker 1: goes in two phases, I think, like, especially like as
Speaker 1: far as it did in Germany where we've seen it elsewhere.
Speaker 1: First it's we have to stop people from finding out
Speaker 1: the information. And they did that for about ten years
Speaker 1: or so, right, and they became more and more and
Speaker 1: more and more frantic. But now that everybody knows the information,
Speaker 1: investing any more time, Like, once a critical mass of
Speaker 1: people know the information, any resources spent trying to stop
Speaker 1: people from learning that information is a waste because there's
Speaker 1: more people on the ground sharing it socially, like in
Speaker 1: person with one another through conversation, then are going to
Speaker 1: be able to learn about it. Even if you get
Speaker 1: kept everything. If you censored everything in television, in online,
Speaker 1: in podcasts, like you just took it all down, if
Speaker 1: literally the entire internet and everything went dark, the information
Speaker 1: was still spread almost as rapidly as it is now
Speaker 1: without you censoring anything, right Like, that's just how this
Speaker 1: is how exponential systems work. Right, you pass that point
Speaker 1: of criticality, so you're not going to spend any more
Speaker 1: time and resources there. You would have to immediately pivot
Speaker 1: into stopping people from organizing on that information, which is
Speaker 1: what I think they're doing now because it's the only
Speaker 1: move that they can make. Right, Like, not only are
Speaker 1: you not getting any results censoring, but anytime that any
Speaker 1: any money or resources that you invest in censors aren't
Speaker 1: going to do anything, So they're going to stop doing it,
Speaker 1: and that also means they're going to start doing something else.
Speaker 1: And the only thing that they can do is the
Speaker 1: only thing that they will do, which is stop people
Speaker 1: organizing on that information. Right, Like this is when things
Speaker 1: get a little bit more soft touch, right Like this
Speaker 1: is actually where this is actually the shortest period, right,
Speaker 1: like the sensor information to try and control the narrative period.
Speaker 1: That's a long period of time, right in the scale
Speaker 1: of how fast these things or this in the scale
Speaker 1: of the lifetime of of the regimes of the Jewish people,
Speaker 1: this bit is the much shorter bit by comparison. It's
Speaker 1: also the bit that's going to be a little bit scary,
Speaker 1: I think because if their goal is to say, if
Speaker 1: they have to move to stop you from organizing on information, right,
Speaker 1: we're talking about irl things, right And if permanently banning
Speaker 1: your account or suspending your account sucks in a digital sense,
Speaker 1: what comes next is going to suck in a physical sense.
Speaker 1: And I'd like to know what your guys' thoughts are
Speaker 1: about that, because I think people are going to have
Speaker 1: to be a little bit brave, Like if there's any
Speaker 1: time that you're gonna get a knock on the door
Speaker 1: or get politically persecuted. We're entering that phase of the
Speaker 1: game now. In my opinion, I'd love to hear what
Speaker 1: you guys think. Pete.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think a lot of people think that by
Speaker 2: voting for a republic get in JD. Evans getting elected
Speaker 2: or something like that, that's going to protect them from
Speaker 2: that where I mean, all you see is like, you know,
Speaker 2: do I believe Jewish power is collapsing? Sure? Is it
Speaker 2: going to collapse tomorrow? No, So they're going to go.
Speaker 2: They're going to go hard. And I don't know that JD.
Speaker 2: Vance is going to stand in their way. You know,
Speaker 2: people have this idea that he that I mean, he's
Speaker 2: I don't even think he's going to be able to
Speaker 2: get elected considering just how much of a disaster this
Speaker 2: this administration is, and you know, considering taking into consideration
Speaker 2: Stormy and Jay's GOP Sampson option. Yeah, I mean it could.
Speaker 2: I don't know that it could be any clearer that
Speaker 2: they're destroying the GOP, or at least if they're not
Speaker 2: destroying the GOP, which I don't think they can, they're
Speaker 2: destroying the GOP to the point where the rom like
Speaker 2: the Romney Bush crew can come back in. And I'm
Speaker 2: not saying that Mitt Romney or a Bush is going
Speaker 2: to come back in.
Speaker 1: They need to stop it from being a vector for
Speaker 1: nationalism to your point.
Speaker 2: Right, So so they you have somebody who is in
Speaker 2: that camp, you know, I mean, Marco Rubio is in
Speaker 2: that camp. Sorry, these you have a bunch of these
Speaker 2: people who are still loyal to that worldview and who
Speaker 2: are still bought by that worldview, you know, maybe even
Speaker 2: you know, blackmailed by that worldview. And I think that
Speaker 2: is the goal, is to get those people back in power.
Speaker 2: And you know, it's going to come around in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty eight. And I'm not going to make any predictions
Speaker 2: because my predictions always come wrong or always wrong. But
Speaker 2: if it is one of those people, you're going you know,
Speaker 2: there are people listening to this who are going to
Speaker 2: go to the ballot box and go, hey, at least
Speaker 2: it's better than the Democrat and hit the lever for
Speaker 2: the rep you know, for the Zionist, for the you know,
Speaker 2: for the person who's owned by Jews. Is there a
Speaker 2: chance to left the Democrat would be owned by Jew? Sure? Yeah, okay,
Speaker 2: but it always seems like James, Yeah, I mean, but
Speaker 2: when has the anti Semitism, the crackdown on anti Semitism
Speaker 2: happened more under the last couple of years of Biden
Speaker 2: after October seventh, or under Trump. When has it been
Speaker 2: more obvious that Washington, DC is owned by is owned
Speaker 2: by Jews under Trump? So you have to look at
Speaker 2: these things. Yeah, and I'm not like I'm saying, I'm
Speaker 2: not saying vote vote for Go vote for a Democrat,
Speaker 2: or go vote for a Republican in twenty twenty eight,
Speaker 2: do whatever the fuck you want, but don't pull that
Speaker 2: you know, don't push that button or touch that screen
Speaker 2: or what however the fuck you do it where you
Speaker 2: live thinking that you're like this is a like a
Speaker 2: protest vote or or this is a vote that's going
Speaker 2: to like protect you from like the word you know. Oh,
Speaker 2: there's there's bad and there's worse. I don't think there's
Speaker 2: bad and worse anymore. I think there's bad and bad
Speaker 2: or worse and worse. And I mean I just think
Speaker 2: that's coming. Oh who's gonna be the one who's gonna
Speaker 2: who's gonna crack down on me because of my beliefs?
Speaker 2: I don't know. I'm thinking both sides.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, yeah, and it's gonna be worse than
Speaker 1: it was before, because they're more fucking frantic than they
Speaker 1: are before. They're more exposed than they've ever been before.
Speaker 1: The State of Israel is more imperiled than it's ever
Speaker 1: been before. So the stakes are increasing for them. Do
Speaker 1: you think they're not going to make the stakes increase
Speaker 1: for you?
Speaker 2: Yeah, one hundred percent, though, Like going to the.
Speaker 1: Voting booth, fine if you if you think that you
Speaker 1: have to right, if you think that actually does anything? Right?
Speaker 1: Do we get in, did we get the Save Act?
Speaker 1: Do we have any way of even policing our voting machines?
Speaker 1: Who owns the voting machines?
Speaker 3: Like?
Speaker 1: None of these questions are answered. The only questions that
Speaker 1: people demand are are you voting for our guy or
Speaker 1: the other guy? Or are you are you going to
Speaker 1: vote for the Democrats?
Speaker 2: Like?
Speaker 1: Or do our votes count? Our votes counted correctly?
Speaker 3: Like?
Speaker 2: You can't even get a legitimate poll. People like Mark
Speaker 2: Mitchell have been run out of the industry. You get
Speaker 2: polls like, oh, one hundred, one hundred percent of people
Speaker 2: who support Donald Trump support the war.
Speaker 1: Okay, you're giving the system legitimacy. I guess it's the
Speaker 1: last credit. It's the last legit It's The last credibility
Speaker 1: fucking that they have is everyone believing that they have
Speaker 1: a stake in it, and that fucking ritual is how
Speaker 1: they do it. Well, the way they do it makes
Speaker 1: them come out and say it.
Speaker 2: It's partly the ritual, and it's also partly Hey, if
Speaker 2: you don't if you don't vote for the Republican, the
Speaker 2: Democrat is going to be ten times worse if you
Speaker 2: don't vote for the Democrat, the Republican. You know, if
Speaker 2: you don't vote for the republic Democrat, the Democrats going
Speaker 2: to have is going to institute Marxism if you don't
Speaker 2: vote for the republic If you don't vote for the Democrat,
Speaker 2: the Republican is going to institute fascism. Everyone's going to
Speaker 2: do a Fascism or a Marxism, depending on how you vote.
Speaker 2: I fucking wished a Republican would institute a fucking fascism,
Speaker 2: But jeez, that's me to vote. But that's not happening.
Speaker 2: I mean, the only thing I care about the twenty
Speaker 2: twenty eight election is I want to see if somebody
Speaker 2: on one of the sides runs staunchly anti Israel, anti Zionist. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's that's all. I'm interested in and I'm not even
Speaker 2: interested in them winning because I don't know that I
Speaker 2: would trust that they were. I would just want to
Speaker 2: see the react by the people. That's all I can.
Speaker 1: This is the thing is that we're so fucking removed
Speaker 1: from even having any hope because honestly, Pete, just like
Speaker 1: you said about like you just want to see that
Speaker 1: was the big thing with Trump. I think people were
Speaker 1: just people were skeptical the entire time. They voted for Trump,
Speaker 1: but they were skeptical. And I think that's what he
Speaker 1: hasn't figured out right, like how fast his how fast
Speaker 1: his support basically just disappeared when he started basically backtracking
Speaker 1: on everything. I think he has the opinion that, oh, well,
Speaker 1: now the people believed in me, just like last time,
Speaker 1: well like in between your last presidency, in this one.
Speaker 1: People have had COVID and they all watched twenty twenty happen.
Speaker 1: They watched the rioting in the streets. They watched the
Speaker 1: fucking experts tell them like, uh, COVID wants you to
Speaker 1: support George Floyd, and if you support George Floyd, it
Speaker 1: won't infect you. They watched the election get stolen. There
Speaker 1: was like a before the election, there was a complete
Speaker 1: disillusion with a disillusion with government entirely, and really, I
Speaker 1: would say in most people's minds, the voting for Donald
Speaker 1: Trump that happened in twenty twenty four was a skeptic vote,
Speaker 1: like okay, sure, Like I'll vote for you, but I
Speaker 1: don't really think you can do anything or I would
Speaker 1: like to see you do something. I think people are skeptical. Now,
Speaker 1: how skeptical are they going to be after the last
Speaker 1: guy that they rolled the dice on basically turned around
Speaker 1: and did everything that he said he wouldn't do, Like,
Speaker 1: how do you get people to trust the system anymore?
Speaker 1: Like twenty twenty hurt the credibility of the system, COVID
Speaker 1: hurt the credibility of the system. Now when they do
Speaker 1: a protest vote, now that doesn't work either. It's just
Speaker 1: like Donald Trump trying to manipulate the oil markets. It
Speaker 1: worked at first, then it started working less, and now
Speaker 1: it doesn't work at all because people don't believe him.
Speaker 1: I don't know, man Martin Armstrong that has been predicting
Speaker 1: since the eighties, and whoever's listening to this and doesn't
Speaker 1: know who that is, then just completely disregard this, This
Speaker 1: will have no weight for you. But Martin Armstrong has
Speaker 1: been predicting since the eighties that twenty twenty eight is
Speaker 1: the last US election based whether that means like twenty
Speaker 1: thirty two doesn't happen, or that twenty twenty eight like
Speaker 1: kicks it off. I don't know what it means, and
Speaker 1: he doesn't know what it means. And it sounded really
Speaker 1: really crazy in twenty ten when I first heard it.
Speaker 1: It sounded crazy in fucking twenty nineteen, like seven years ago,
Speaker 1: that sounded insane to me. It doesn't seem so insane now.
Speaker 2: And what I think if if three years ago, if
Speaker 2: four years ago someone would have told you that, like
Speaker 2: random strangers on the street were trying to jpill you,
Speaker 2: you would have been like, get the fuck out of here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well not me, because I was yacking your ears
Speaker 1: off about Roger's theorem.
Speaker 2: Yeah true, but yeah four years ago before before October seventh.
Speaker 1: Yep, no one would believe where we were even where
Speaker 1: we are today. Nobody would even believe in a year
Speaker 1: ago to where like random strangers are coming up to
Speaker 1: you on basically on the street nears makes no difference,
Speaker 1: and not trying to anti Zionists pill you, but trying
Speaker 1: to straight up jew pill you. Like that's the biggest
Speaker 1: I think that's the biggest change that I've noticed. Is
Speaker 1: before it was like, yeah, well, you know, Israel it's
Speaker 1: not really our friend, right, and that now it's like,
Speaker 1: you know, like Jews kill babies and like drain their blood.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Like whether or not that's true or not, it likely
Speaker 1: is the fact that that's what the normies are trying
Speaker 1: to fucking red pill you on is a drastic difference
Speaker 1: because that means the normies have noticed race, yep. And
Speaker 1: I think that's the biggest difference between even twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four election and now is the awareness of race. And
Speaker 1: it's the fucking Jews. Funny enough, that's done it, right,
Speaker 1: because you can't notice the fucking Jews as other without going, oh,
Speaker 1: we'll wait a second, why do they hate just white
Speaker 1: people so much? Like I don't know, I don't know
Speaker 1: if that's been your perception, but like every time a
Speaker 1: normany is kind of like trying jupill me, which happens
Speaker 1: quite a bit, and I just like and I tilted
Speaker 1: towards race, like yeah, like why do they have against us?
Speaker 1: What do they have. It's like they hate white people.
Speaker 1: They're like, yeah, they fucking hate white people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's obvious. And and then you can even get
Speaker 2: them to if you push them into how Jews do
Speaker 2: the counter she hod where they try to they try
Speaker 2: to get you to hate it's like, oh, you know,
Speaker 2: it's really the Muslims. It's the you know, look, we're
Speaker 2: surrounded by Muslims. Israel's a small country surrounded by Muslims.
Speaker 2: There's there's one point five billion, and can't Israel have
Speaker 2: its own country? The Muslims have all these countries, there's
Speaker 2: one point five billion Muslims. How many Jews are there? Yeah,
Speaker 2: there's going to be more fucking Muslim countries than there
Speaker 2: are Jews. That's fucking that's basically geography. So shut the
Speaker 2: fuck up with that argument. It doesn't work on me.
Speaker 2: But they try to get you to hate Muslims, and
Speaker 2: it's like, oh, well, look, Muslims are Muslim, Muslims are
Speaker 2: just natural terrorists. All they want to do is kill Jews. Okay,
Speaker 2: why if that's true? Why? And no one wants to
Speaker 2: answer those fucking and no one wants to either ask
Speaker 2: that question or answer the question. It's like I mean,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry for knowing my history. I'm sorry. You know,
Speaker 2: I experienced a guy I was at a party friend
Speaker 2: of mine's house. Did not want to rock the boat,
Speaker 2: but this fucking Jew told me straight to my face
Speaker 2: that Palestinians don't exist. That land was empty before Jews
Speaker 2: started going there. And I'm like, you know, I have
Speaker 2: a fucking gun, right, you have to assume I have
Speaker 2: a fucking gun on me. I just I mean, these
Speaker 2: people are how do you fucking deal with people like that?
Speaker 2: They basically they are exterminationist, the lunatics. They are exterminationists.
Speaker 2: They want to kill everyone who's not them. And then
Speaker 2: as I forget, I think it was Michael Collins Pipate, Yeah,
Speaker 2: but Michael Collins Piper pointed out he said, I mean
Speaker 2: even if the Jews killed every like, every non Jew,
Speaker 2: they just kill each other after that, because I mean,
Speaker 2: that's that's how that's their attitude. I mean, and think
Speaker 2: about it. I mean, if you have if you have
Speaker 2: two the.
Speaker 1: Real punishment of the concentration camps, we forced them to
Speaker 1: only interact with one another, if.
Speaker 2: You have two thousand years of you know, I mean
Speaker 2: assuming that this bloodline is two thousand years old. Let's
Speaker 2: let's assume the cause art theory doesn't exist, that this
Speaker 2: is one continuous bloodline. Can you imagine two thousand years
Speaker 2: of not being able to get rid of to get
Speaker 2: rid of your sins, to exipate your sins, that that
Speaker 2: builds up for two thousand years. You and you deny
Speaker 2: logos and you killed Christ and you like burned down
Speaker 2: forty thousand churches in Russia and killed you know, tens,
Speaker 2: you know, you know, probably thirty or forty million Christians,
Speaker 2: and you have a war going on right now that
Speaker 2: you orchestrated, where Christians are killing Christians. How are you
Speaker 2: not cursed? I mean, and I mean that's I'm choosing
Speaker 2: the word cursed, and that's not the word I want
Speaker 2: to use. It's just a word that you know, you
Speaker 2: can use in public. How are you not the most cursed?
Speaker 2: It's remarkable to me. I don't understand how people see
Speaker 2: this is the difference. The difference is is that I
Speaker 2: see organized Jewelry as civilization, civilization, civilization destroying force. There
Speaker 2: are people that I know that just see them as
Speaker 2: more wealthy. Somalis just another interest group that's taking advantage
Speaker 2: of us. Well, you don't know your fucking history like
Speaker 2: I do. Yep, you cannot understand the last thirty five
Speaker 2: hundred years of history, but you cannot understand the last
Speaker 2: two thousand years of European history until you understand the JQ,
Speaker 2: the two thousand years of Christendom. You do not understand
Speaker 2: it at all until you sit down. And I'm not
Speaker 2: trying to blow my own horn. I'm not trying to
Speaker 2: promote my own shit. One hundred and twenty four episodes.
Speaker 2: Go listen to it, go watch it. It's on Rumble,
Speaker 2: it's on Audu. See all one hundred and twenty four episodes.
Speaker 2: I think a one twenty four world drop On Saturday.
Speaker 2: Alexander Soltianist and pretty sure he was married to a
Speaker 2: Jewish woman, wrote about what they did in Russia. Go
Speaker 2: tell me. If you do not see the parallels, you're
Speaker 2: you're lost and you need to get out of the way.
Speaker 2: You're not you know, as you know Thomas says, You're
Speaker 2: just you're not in the game.
Speaker 1: It's I'm very happy that a lot of our cultural leaders,
Speaker 1: like guys like Tucker and just a lot of people
Speaker 1: I bumped into on the street that would have otherwise
Speaker 1: been like athioid you know interactions. Have you guys also
Speaker 1: noticed like along with the Jay pilling, people are also
Speaker 1: trying to like spiritual pill you or metaphysically pill you. Right,
Speaker 1: like the normy realizes somehow they have no way of
Speaker 1: like putting it into words. They can't contextualize it. Some
Speaker 1: will contextualize it, you know by just kind of like
Speaker 1: mimicking you know, Tucker and and his framing. But I'm
Speaker 1: getting the sense that people are starting to recognize that
Speaker 1: there are metaphysical forces at play.
Speaker 2: Yes, very much.
Speaker 4: So, yeah, you two, they take a variety, It takes
Speaker 4: a variety of forms, having a lot of people hit
Speaker 4: me up with like astrology and numerology stuff also like
Speaker 4: out of, out of And there's one of the challenges
Speaker 4: that I have is that.
Speaker 2: Like, yes, people believe in it.
Speaker 4: Yes, I think that there are some influences, like you know,
Speaker 4: on certain kinds of things. And yes, uh, our enemy
Speaker 4: believe deeply in these things. And so being able to
Speaker 4: draw these parallels to understand you know, what's making it
Speaker 4: happen could be people doing it, you know, along these timings. Yes, absolutely,
Speaker 4: we certainly know that they were all excited about you know,
Speaker 4: purem and some alignment this time like three planet alignment,
Speaker 4: et cetera. But in general, yes, people are very much.
Speaker 4: I've had more guys come to me and be like,
Speaker 4: I realize that evil is real and so God is real.
Speaker 4: Like I've heard that more people than ever in my
Speaker 4: entire life in the past year.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 4: Same, You're and a half to wild and it's accelerating.
Speaker 1: I don't know if this is the place, time and
Speaker 1: place for it. But if you want me to break
Speaker 1: down astrology, like astrology, yeah, isn't what people think it
Speaker 1: is right and the reason why it's it's it's predictive
Speaker 1: in broad broadways, isn't for the reasons that people think
Speaker 1: it is right in the same way that like thinking
Speaker 1: a clock is you know, predictive, but not realizing that
Speaker 1: a clock is just measuring time.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: So when people of ancient times looked at the stars,
Speaker 1: that was the clock that they had access to, right,
Speaker 1: Like all of the assigning you know, deities to this
Speaker 1: or that or whatever, right, that's backfilling, right, that's retconning
Speaker 1: to try and help them make sense of why the
Speaker 1: clock in the sky was you know, telling them things. Right,
Speaker 1: So time has a geometry like every other spatial dimension.
Speaker 1: That means it has curves, that means it has shapes,
Speaker 1: that means it has angles and lines, and it has
Speaker 1: a geometry. And what that clock in the sky allowed
Speaker 1: them to do was recognized the patterns in the shape
Speaker 1: of that geometry. They didn't need to know why things
Speaker 1: were happening, right, But God from creation encoded patterns in
Speaker 1: all of the dimensions. We see them in our spatial dimensions, right,
Speaker 1: We see the fractal patterns that emerge in every bit
Speaker 1: of living life, every bit of non living life.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: A rock structure is just as fractal as a leaf's structure.
Speaker 1: These are both fractal forms of geometry. They are the
Speaker 1: geometry of the spatial dimension. And there is a fractal
Speaker 1: geometry to our temporal dimension. And the only thing that
Speaker 1: they had to measure the geometry of time. Right, The
Speaker 1: flows and lines in it were the planets because it operates.
Speaker 1: I don't know if anyone's noticed this or not. Time
Speaker 1: is long, is big. It's a very long thing, and
Speaker 1: human beings only represent in our life a very short period.
Speaker 1: So the only thing that they had that was big
Speaker 1: enough and long enough was the planets and the stars, right,
Speaker 1: But if you give a bitch fucking chicken bones, she'll
Speaker 1: turn it into divination. Sorry, ladies, it's just something that
Speaker 1: you do, right, you guys trying to turn everything into
Speaker 1: fortune telling no matter what it is. But that's why
Speaker 1: astrology is predictive in some capacities, and that's what it's
Speaker 1: usually very indicative when you look at it retroactively, right,
Speaker 1: like when you when you back test it, right, because
Speaker 1: it's measuring the shapes of time. And funny enough, Pete,
Speaker 1: I shared the only thing that does scare me is
Speaker 1: about like certain personality and personal components. I shared this
Speaker 1: with Pete Carl. I don't think I shared it to you,
Speaker 1: but a friend of mine put in my birth chart
Speaker 1: into a an astrology AI and basically made it freak
Speaker 1: out in a way that this person who does this
Speaker 1: frequently has never seen before. And it's literally in this
Speaker 1: print out or like in the in the thing is
Speaker 1: telling me I need to stay away from nationalism and that,
Speaker 1: oh bro, I'll share it with it. It's really funny.
Speaker 1: It's basically astrology, Hitler. But yeah, so it is. It
Speaker 1: is something that people are going to pick up on
Speaker 1: it's the same thing that they're picking up on in
Speaker 1: like with men like like I I'm seeing evil places
Speaker 1: like I can't describe these events or these behaviors any
Speaker 1: other way. And I think that at the same time
Speaker 1: as racial consciousness is starting to emerge against white people
Speaker 1: amongst white people in a big in a big way,
Speaker 1: this is really really good. And like Pete, I don't
Speaker 1: know how anyone could think that you're black pilt because
Speaker 1: you have been talking about this very thing for fucking years,
Speaker 1: like the desired end state where we need to go
Speaker 1: that he's Pete's been saying we need to go here
Speaker 1: for forever. We are almost to that point, and people
Speaker 1: think that Pete is black pilling.
Speaker 2: Well because when we get to the stretch, well, because
Speaker 2: when we get to that point, we're going to have
Speaker 2: to do something. We're going to have to work. And
Speaker 2: that's what people don't want. People do not want to work.
Speaker 2: People do not people do not want to grow their
Speaker 2: own food. People do not want to go a haul
Speaker 2: frigging soil and dig things up and build beds and
Speaker 2: do all sorts of things like that. People don't want
Speaker 2: to hear that that's going to be that may be
Speaker 2: a part of the future, and it may be a
Speaker 2: big part of the future.
Speaker 1: They don't even know the paper let alone help them
Speaker 1: build a shed for a barn.
Speaker 2: Yeah. People don't want to They don't want to know
Speaker 2: that there's pain coming. But there's pain coming, and you're
Speaker 2: just going to have to deal with that. Your fucking
Speaker 2: ancestors dealt with it. I mean, think about one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty years ago. Think about what dent like dental.
Speaker 2: I've had dental surgery. I probably had like five or
Speaker 2: six dental surgeries. I can't imagine what it was like
Speaker 2: one hundred and fifty years ago for like dental surgery.
Speaker 2: You know, if you if you had if you had
Speaker 2: a fucking toothache. Yeah, I had surgery last year for
Speaker 2: kidney stones. You imagine being in the Middle Ages and
Speaker 2: you get that pain kicks in.
Speaker 1: What do you do?
Speaker 2: Your ancestors lived through this shit, and now you're just
Speaker 2: so fucking you're so much of a pussy. You're like,
Speaker 2: you're scared that you might actually have to like grow
Speaker 2: food or get a couple of chickens, or you might
Speaker 2: have to or God forbid, you might leave the house
Speaker 2: and go organize with a bunch of people and figure
Speaker 2: out exactly how you're going to get through some hard times.
Speaker 2: I mean, God forbid you would do that. I mean
Speaker 2: because I mean you're not post what you mean. I can't.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to change this by posting on Twitter. Dude.
Speaker 2: I'm one tweet away from changing the world. I'm one
Speaker 2: tweet away from from defeating my enemies.
Speaker 1: Pete. Not only are we going to go through the
Speaker 1: go through pain, we deserve every bit of the suffering
Speaker 1: we are going to go through. It has to happen.
Speaker 1: It is right for it to happen. Like people are
Speaker 1: going to cry about boomers, like, yeah, you want to
Speaker 1: not we are paying for the sins of our fathers, right,
Speaker 1: But God will be paid what he is owed. Someone's
Speaker 1: going to pay. And that's the only way we're going
Speaker 1: to enjoy any of his blessing ever again, is if
Speaker 1: we pay the fuck up. So, yes, the boomers skirted
Speaker 1: on the bill and left us with the debt, but
Speaker 1: it's a debt. Debt's owed and it's going to have
Speaker 1: to get paid and will come out better for it,
Speaker 1: like we will. We need to pay what we have,
Speaker 1: like the debt that has accrued for the less hundred years.
Speaker 1: And that is the only way we're ever going to
Speaker 1: enjoy God's favoritism again because we had it, and that's
Speaker 1: going to take fucking pain. Pete's right.
Speaker 2: Can I ask you something?
Speaker 4: How to suck fellows?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Have you?
Speaker 2: Have you ever.
Speaker 4: Felt anything that felt genuinely rewarding, that was genuinely satisfying,
Speaker 4: that didn't require a shipload of pain which drove growth,
Speaker 4: which drove development, which drove humility, which drove appreciation.
Speaker 2: Like every it's it's nice.
Speaker 1: One thing, Yeah, only one thing I can think of,
Speaker 1: and that's charity. Mm hmmm, yes, like genuine, genuine, Yes,
Speaker 1: I am going to go out of my way and
Speaker 1: I am going to take care of you know's a
Speaker 1: very big In my most recent instance, I spend a
Speaker 1: large amount of money paying for an unexpected expense of
Speaker 1: a person I only know tangentially. But it was just
Speaker 1: very sad and I got more happiness out of that
Speaker 1: then I've gotten from buying anything, and it lasted a
Speaker 1: really long time. If I buy like a new car,
Speaker 1: or like a new thing, like I'm happy about it
Speaker 1: for like a day, a new watch, like I'm happy
Speaker 1: about it for a day.
Speaker 2: Maybe but.
Speaker 1: When I pay for something like that, like it made
Speaker 1: me smile for like a fucking week man. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: that's the only thing I can think of. I think
Speaker 1: that I would say it's safe to say that is
Speaker 1: the only thing that will make you happy outside of
Speaker 1: what you're describing, Carl.
Speaker 4: Yeah, because I think about all the stuff that I
Speaker 4: thought I wanted when I was a young shithead, and
Speaker 4: like I didn't deserve any of it, Like.
Speaker 2: It took so much.
Speaker 4: For me to actually grow and and develop as a
Speaker 4: person to be able to appreciate a thing. To get
Speaker 4: into your point, Stormy, like someone gives you something for
Speaker 4: free and it's just like something that makes your life easier,
Speaker 4: Like it's you don't really appreciate it. I mean, I'm
Speaker 4: not I'm not saying that if someone gives you charity.
Speaker 4: People who receive charity don't appreciate it.
Speaker 2: There's some that don't.
Speaker 4: But but in general, like if if something is going
Speaker 4: to come from me, the only thing that that is
Speaker 4: good long term is stuff that is that is suffering
Speaker 4: and is hard and it's difficult, something you're proud of.
Speaker 4: It's the only thing you're proud of. Yeah, other than
Speaker 4: but that was a lot of work, and that was hard,
Speaker 4: a lot, a lot, a lot, a lot of sacrifice.
Speaker 4: You want to join you in, Yeah, I'll tell you
Speaker 4: guys a story one or when we're off there.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: You gotta's talk about stuff like that publicly. Yeah, yeah, it's.
Speaker 1: It. It's the easiest thing we can do too. I
Speaker 1: just got done rattling off about how our young guys
Speaker 1: are hyper susceptible to people leveraging respectability against them nefariously
Speaker 1: or dishonestly. You know, it's a great way to overcome
Speaker 1: that and make yourself immune from that and also give
Speaker 1: yourself a huge leg up in the world. Let's do
Speaker 1: exactly what CAR talking about right now, right like even
Speaker 1: something as dumb as like building a barn, building a
Speaker 1: stone wall, building a greenhouse. These are things that don't
Speaker 1: cost any money and are very hard to do. I
Speaker 1: would recommend building a stone wall and a barn and
Speaker 1: learning timber framing and stone construction back to back. It
Speaker 1: doesn't have to like. The one thing I can say
Speaker 1: about having the success that I've had, I guess, like
Speaker 1: financially or whatever, is that I got to buy all
Speaker 1: the things that I thought as a young man would
Speaker 1: make me happy, and none of it did, so I
Speaker 1: was immunized from that. I was still fucking miserable. Like
Speaker 1: you can be suicidal with a lot of money. I
Speaker 1: hate to break it to you, but all of the
Speaker 1: things that you think you want, unless they're like real
Speaker 1: things like we're talking about, they will mean nothing to you.
Speaker 1: You work all this time, and you'll save all this money,
Speaker 1: and you'll buy this thing that you're super excited about,
Speaker 1: and in two days it'll be as if it never happened,
Speaker 1: and all that time and all that work and saving
Speaker 1: is gone. You saved it up to buy a thing
Speaker 1: that you were really excited about, you thought was going
Speaker 1: to make you very happy, and two days later it's gone. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it doesn't make you happy at all. And that's the
Speaker 1: biggest trick of it, it really is. I've seen to
Speaker 1: notice people a lot less materialistic, which is really good,
Speaker 1: like just regular people, and times haven't even really gotten
Speaker 1: that tough yet. I think the pursuit basically opting out
Speaker 1: of the material consumerism. If a person's done that, they're
Speaker 1: ready to hear what we have to say, and they
Speaker 1: may not even consciously know that they're doing it right,
Speaker 1: Like just I notice this in myself. I notice it
Speaker 1: in others that I see just the vacations, the the
Speaker 1: material things just aren't exciting people anymore. I don't know
Speaker 1: if you guys have seen that, Like the status purchases,
Speaker 1: right they that they're I don't see any of them anymore.
Speaker 1: Outside of real estate, like people trying to you know,
Speaker 1: buy nice houses usually with like a bit of security
Speaker 1: in mind, or some land. Outside of that, I'm not
Speaker 1: seeing any of it. I would love to see what,
Speaker 1: you know, the luxury car sales have been. I'd love
Speaker 1: to see what you know, the entry level rolexes are doing.
Speaker 1: I'd imagine they're not very good.
Speaker 2: No, they're not. It's funny.
Speaker 4: I know all these especially like retirees, who have been
Speaker 4: buying cars like crazy, and it's almost like it makes
Speaker 4: them miserable. It's really strange, but like they're like, ugh,
Speaker 4: and I you know, and I'm like, I drive a
Speaker 4: fourteen year old car that I love, and it's like
Speaker 4: it it just it just works for me. It's good enough,
Speaker 4: it's fast enough, you know, it's responsive enough. I just
Speaker 4: you know, it's it's absolutely wild to me these are
Speaker 4: guys that are buying I.
Speaker 1: Can completely understand, because that's you just describe my life
Speaker 1: right now. Yeah, I had too many cars and most
Speaker 1: of them make me miserable.
Speaker 4: They buy a brand new car that costs a ton
Speaker 4: of money and they're just like ugh. And like one
Speaker 4: of the guys, I was like, how's your car? And
Speaker 4: he's like, I took it back. I was like, what
Speaker 4: are you talking about it?
Speaker 1: Take it back?
Speaker 2: Was there like a penalty or anything? It's so safe
Speaker 2: with it? Yeah, yeah, it was fine. I just it
Speaker 2: just wasn't worth it. I didn't like it.
Speaker 4: Too many screens and you know, something was annoying about it.
Speaker 4: It wasn't it wasn't instinctive. It costs too much. I
Speaker 4: hate the payment. I'd rather pay you know, X dollars
Speaker 4: to get out of it.
Speaker 2: All right, Well, I mean, you know, the Stormy understands
Speaker 2: the South Florida mentality when it comes to status purchases. Yes,
Speaker 2: I remember back in like, oh man, this was in
Speaker 2: the late eighties. I remember I was working in a
Speaker 2: gas station, you know, like right out of high school
Speaker 2: and everything, right, but like in between that and college,
Speaker 2: and this guy pulls in with a truck of flatbed
Speaker 2: and there's a there's a brand new Corvette on it,
Speaker 2: and I was like, oh, what's wrong with that. He's like, oh, nothing, nothing,
Speaker 2: I just bought it and everything. And I'm like, really, man,
Speaker 2: oh that's cool, that's cool. He's like, yeah, yeah, he
Speaker 2: wasn't happy about it. Like you would think you just
Speaker 2: bought this, you know, this new vet and everything, and
Speaker 2: you'd be you know, ecstatic, you'd be excited. You'd be like,
Speaker 2: I can't wait to get home. Yeah, he wasn't happy
Speaker 2: about it, and you would see. I saw a lot
Speaker 2: of that. You know, being in South already, you get
Speaker 2: to experience a lot of people who have money, and
Speaker 2: you know, even old money, but you know, South Florida
Speaker 2: is also a lot of new money. Yeah, and they're
Speaker 2: they're driving around and it's like, oh man, you know,
Speaker 2: nice car. I remember this guy had an Excalibur, and
Speaker 2: you know, I've always liked the Excalibur because I love
Speaker 2: the classics things like that. I was like, man, that's
Speaker 2: really nice and everything. And you can't get them to
Speaker 2: smile and talk about it like they're excited about it.
Speaker 2: It's like it's almost it's a fucking burden. It's a
Speaker 2: burden to them, you know. And I think I've seen
Speaker 2: a lot of people just pairing down, you know, getting
Speaker 2: you know, my truck's thirty years old, my car's fourteen
Speaker 2: years old. Yeah, and I just seen a lot of
Speaker 2: people they're just paaring down, even houses. They're looking to
Speaker 2: sell their big house and get something smaller. Things like that,
Speaker 2: and you know, just have something reliable. It's almost like
Speaker 2: people know something's coming, but you know that's that's going
Speaker 2: to be area specific too, you know. I mean I
Speaker 2: live around a lot of people who most of the
Speaker 2: people I live around are very down to earth. They're
Speaker 2: not like, you know, chasing waiting for the new you know,
Speaker 2: waiting for the new generation of Rolex to come out,
Speaker 2: or waiting for the new F one, you know, F
Speaker 2: one fifty, the King ranchit. They're going to spend one
Speaker 2: hundred and ten grand on nobody around here, Nobody I
Speaker 2: know that I hang out with doeset. And when you
Speaker 2: meet people like that, it's it's like they've burdened themselves
Speaker 2: by having that thing. And if they get rid of it,
Speaker 2: you notice like an attitude change. You notice it. It's like, oh,
Speaker 2: that's like a weight off of my back. I mean,
Speaker 2: I haven't had a car payment in well over a decade,
Speaker 2: and people don't realize just how much of a burden
Speaker 2: than a car payment is and or you know, and
Speaker 2: you know, mortgage is bad enough. But you know, that's
Speaker 2: the one thing that you can make an argument that
Speaker 2: it's like, look, I'm not going to be able to
Speaker 2: come up with three four hundred grand. But you know,
Speaker 2: once they get out from under that, you know, you know,
Speaker 2: if you know someone who's paid off their mortgage, I mean,
Speaker 2: they're they're walking different. Yes, there there people don't.
Speaker 1: There used to be parties for that. Oh yeah, the
Speaker 1: mortgage book burning parties.
Speaker 2: It is a debt, I mean. And and you know,
Speaker 2: forgive us our debts is we forgive our debtors. I
Speaker 2: mean this people do not realize what a spiritual burden
Speaker 2: that is that they're they're taking on. And you know,
Speaker 2: I encourage I encourage people to buy land. You know,
Speaker 2: but you can find a very you can find a
Speaker 2: lot of land with a you know, a humble how
Speaker 2: on it that is well built, maybe one hundred years old,
Speaker 2: but very well built. We'll survive a hurricane, you know,
Speaker 2: we'll survive a tornado or a hurricane. People have just
Speaker 2: been their minds have become so judaized by you know, hey,
Speaker 2: I got to go into debt. If I'm not in debt,
Speaker 2: you know, it's like no, man, No, I mean no.
Speaker 2: When it comes to tangible, when it comes to the
Speaker 2: things you need to live now, you want to be
Speaker 2: able to you want to be able to go. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I mean all I all I have to do is
Speaker 2: take care of the upkeep on this. And when you
Speaker 2: know that that's all you have to do, and you
Speaker 2: do have to pay for the upkeep on something, you
Speaker 2: treat it better too. So there's more responsibility there. And
Speaker 2: that's that's a lot of what we're talking about is
Speaker 2: just responsibility. You have to take responsibility for yourself. No
Speaker 2: one is coming to save you. You know, you're not
Speaker 2: going to vote your way out of this. So when
Speaker 2: I say that, people are like, oh, you're calling for revolution,
Speaker 2: I'm like, no, just just you're not going to vote
Speaker 2: your way out of this, so you're gonna have to
Speaker 2: find another way to deal with it. I do not
Speaker 2: condone violence, because I mean initiating violence against what people,
Speaker 2: what most people seem as a legitimate authority, you're retarded.
Speaker 2: I do not tell people to commit, you know, to
Speaker 2: commit crimes. But you're not going to vote your way
Speaker 2: out of this, so you're going to have to figure
Speaker 2: something out. And you know, it seems like that people
Speaker 2: just don't want to do that. They just want to live.
Speaker 2: And I'll tell you, honestly, a lot of the people
Speaker 2: who who say that I'm black pilled, I know that
Speaker 2: these are people who you know, aren't married, don't have
Speaker 2: the job, for the for the the degree that they have.
Speaker 2: And I know it's just projection, but I want what's
Speaker 2: best for you, and what's best for you is get
Speaker 2: together with me, and let's talk about a way forward.
Speaker 2: And you know, forget about Oh, if we just get
Speaker 2: the right person in office. Sure, maybe if you get
Speaker 2: your buddy elected sheriff and mayor of the town, you
Speaker 2: work towards getting him into the governor's office, maybe you know,
Speaker 2: you could throw some patronage down your way and take
Speaker 2: care of you and everything. But I mean, Washington, d C.
Speaker 2: Tel Aviv on the Potomac, Come on, guys, come on,
Speaker 2: I'm here for you, man, I'm here for anyone listening
Speaker 2: to this all.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Tell me people people contact me all the time to
Speaker 2: tell me their problems, and I try to help as
Speaker 2: much as possible. A lot of times I can't help
Speaker 2: because you know, it's just it's out of my hands.
Speaker 2: I you know, I can as much as I might
Speaker 2: want to help, I might contact somebody else who might
Speaker 2: be able to help. They may not want to help,
Speaker 2: and you know that's really out of my hands.
Speaker 1: But I will.
Speaker 2: I will sit with you, I will cry with you.
Speaker 2: I will do anything you you know you need. You
Speaker 2: know what makes what gets you through it. But we're
Speaker 2: all gonna have You're gonna have to do this on
Speaker 2: your own. You're gonna have to do this and you're
Speaker 2: not gonna be able to do it on your own.
Speaker 2: So you're just gonna have to get with other people.
Speaker 2: And that means leaving the house, and that means putting
Speaker 2: down the fucking phone. Yep.
Speaker 1: Funny you say that I just got rid of the
Speaker 1: only car that I had a payment on the other day,
Speaker 1: and like I actually noticed it. I legit field like
Speaker 1: I've had I've had. You got rid of the eight cars?
Speaker 1: Yeah I did. Oh wow, I bought a land Cruiser
Speaker 1: in cash. Hell. Yeah it's a big one. Yeah it's
Speaker 1: that new whatever like the lex uh, the land Crusher. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the prettier land cruiser. Yeah, I just was like it
Speaker 1: was just bugging me. And you do feel better about
Speaker 1: it immediately. And if I like Tom talks about evel
Speaker 1: A lot, Evela was the guy that really hammered home
Speaker 1: for me, Like you have to make yourself a spiritual fortress,
Speaker 1: like an emotional fortress, Like you need to basically be
Speaker 1: like in a castle in your own mind, like nothing,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter what the news says, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: who gets elected, like none of that matters. None of
Speaker 1: that should alter your inner state. None of it should
Speaker 1: even raise your blood pressure one tick. Like in order
Speaker 1: to be for what comes next, you need to be
Speaker 1: immune to all this stuff. And there's certain material things
Speaker 1: that are the that can that that will be able
Speaker 1: that would pull you out of this state right like
Speaker 1: material needs for you know, safety and sustenance. But if
Speaker 1: you do the things that Pete's talking about, you will
Speaker 1: be able to be in a state physically to get
Speaker 1: where Evila says. You need to be mentally right, like
Speaker 1: you need to be unfuck withable. And that's the type
Speaker 1: like people always like you talk about, like people think
Speaker 1: that they're just gonna will something like will change to happen.
Speaker 1: Your will doesn't mean anything in the state that you're
Speaker 1: in right, Like you can't even stop scrolling or stop
Speaker 1: the timeline for making you feel different things like you're
Speaker 1: not in control of your emotions. The phone is the
Speaker 1: events that are happening in Washington are the events that
Speaker 1: are happening in Iran are? Like that is controlling your emotions?
Speaker 1: What are you thinking about? Well, you're thinking about what's
Speaker 1: happening in Washington, what's happening in Iran, or what's happening
Speaker 1: about this election or what this crazy leftoid is doing.
Speaker 1: You don't have any willpower. I mean literally not willpower,
Speaker 1: like oh, I'm going to decide I'm not going to
Speaker 1: eat any sugar, I'm not going to pick up a cigarette.
Speaker 1: That's not willpower. That's happened, like actual force of will
Speaker 1: requires sovereignty in your mind. The person that is sovereignty
Speaker 1: in his mind, that person can will things to happen
Speaker 1: because he gets to use one hundred percent of his brain.
Speaker 1: What is he thinking about, whatever he wants to think about.
Speaker 1: Nothing can distract him, nothing can alter his emotional state.
Speaker 1: No intrusive thoughts are getting in nothing is distracting him.
Speaker 1: People can't make it five minutes holding a single thought
Speaker 1: in their head and nothing else. Like, if you do that,
Speaker 1: you'll have actual power. You will be able to will
Speaker 1: things into existence if there's enough of you. But like,
Speaker 1: getting to that state requires doing what Pete is talking
Speaker 1: about anyways, Right, you're already removing yourself from the system anyways,
Speaker 1: and so in men, doing what it takes to be
Speaker 1: the type of person that Julius Evelt is describing will
Speaker 1: give you the situation that Pete is describing. You will
Speaker 1: have a political revolution when there is a large enough
Speaker 1: number of men that are worthy enough for that to happen. Right, Like,
Speaker 1: you don't get to change your political situation, your cultural
Speaker 1: situation by remaining the same. If you are not a
Speaker 1: different person, a better person, a sovereign person, then how
Speaker 1: do you think that any of those things are going
Speaker 1: to happen around you on a broader scale if you
Speaker 1: can't even do them internally in your own life? You
Speaker 1: want the United States to be sovereign? Can you get
Speaker 1: yourself to be sovereign? Right? You want to exert your
Speaker 1: will politically, can you exert your will anywhere else in
Speaker 1: your life? Do you have control over anything? In your life,
Speaker 1: and I think for a large amount of people, the
Speaker 1: answer is going to be no. Right, like a person
Speaker 1: that lives, I mean, the amount of stuff you were to,
Speaker 1: like the amount your garden pulls down is insane. Like
Speaker 1: he doesn't have to worry about food, He just has
Speaker 1: to upkeep his house, and God literally gives him and
Speaker 1: his neighbors everything they need to survive. Right Like you
Speaker 1: were telling me, I don't want to put you on
Speaker 1: blast too much, but all of your meat needs and
Speaker 1: dairy needs are within like a mile of your house.
Speaker 1: Your garden is putting out a crazy amount of food
Speaker 1: like your you have a complete setup.
Speaker 2: We still we still have food in the in the
Speaker 2: chess freezer from last year and this year we're gonna
Speaker 2: have to get another chess freezer.
Speaker 4: I'm getting another chess freezer this year. What a coincidence.
Speaker 1: If you're in a position where your garden is producing
Speaker 1: literally hundreds of pounds of things, and your neighbors have
Speaker 1: thousands of livestock and you have relationships with them, and
Speaker 1: your house isn't like a debt burden that forces you
Speaker 1: to go be an attention or a labor slave somewhere else,
Speaker 1: Like you now have the preconditions where you can be
Speaker 1: mentally and spiritually sovereign. If you don't have your shit
Speaker 1: together here, no, because you don't give a ship what's
Speaker 1: happening in DC, what's not Like I don't care. I
Speaker 1: allow nothing to affect me here within this space, like
Speaker 1: nothing can get Like it's like a fortress. You know,
Speaker 1: it bothers that person nothing unless he decides that it's
Speaker 1: it is going to occupy his attention. But people can't
Speaker 1: even decide for themselves what to occupy their attention with.
Speaker 1: Right the timeline tells them, the algorithm tells them, the
Speaker 1: president tells them. The Jews basically tell them. They tell
Speaker 1: them what to think about, They tell them what's important,
Speaker 1: what needs to be talked about right this minute. You
Speaker 1: can't focus. Any academic agent actually was the one that
Speaker 1: pointed this out, Like if you're getting mad, you're losing right,
Speaker 1: because the regime will just throw up literal rage fuel
Speaker 1: and now it controls what you're thinking about, Like you
Speaker 1: don't ever get to tunnel down on like I'm going
Speaker 1: to do this fucking thing, Like we are all going
Speaker 1: to work together to achieve this fucking objective because the
Speaker 1: regime moves the current thing, and it controls. By moving
Speaker 1: the current thing about what we're outraged about, everyone's attention
Speaker 1: shifts with it. Everyone is forced to react to the
Speaker 1: new stimulus. So you don't ever get to sit down
Speaker 1: and just obsess about something till it's done. You don't
Speaker 1: get to sink your teeth into anything because it's constantly moving.
Speaker 1: You're constantly getting basically swatted at by stimuli. And it's true.
Speaker 1: I think that's a good place to leave it. Boys,
Speaker 1: sounds good to make.
Speaker 2: I gotta go get some stuff done.
Speaker 1: All right, boys, it's been fun. Till next time.
Speaker 2: Don't disappear. I want to tell you something will all right?
Speaker 1: Yes, please, you got it.