Speaker 1: You see something's going to happen.
Speaker 2: What what's going to happen?
Speaker 3: I think?
Speaker 4: What a.
Speaker 2: Help.
Speaker 5: Welcome to the Occult Rejects this episode. I got a
Speaker 5: couple of us with us and covering a topic I
Speaker 5: really like to talk about.
Speaker 2: AI. But before we get to the guest, Uh, we're
Speaker 2: going to introduce the other rejects and we got my
Speaker 2: man Headless Giant with us. What is going on?
Speaker 1: Sir?
Speaker 6: I I just want to say, Uh, if you guys want,
Speaker 6: you can send me your paranormal stories to the Headless
Speaker 6: Giant Podcast at gmail dot com and if you include
Speaker 6: your address, my co host Nick will send you cult
Speaker 6: reject stickers. So we we do this every Thursday. So
Speaker 6: check us out tomorrow and we will read your emails
Speaker 6: and send out those stickers.
Speaker 5: Hell yeah, thank you sir, definitely sending those emails.
Speaker 2: And my man Bennett, what is going on?
Speaker 7: Sir?
Speaker 2: How are you glad you can make it? Yeah?
Speaker 1: What's up? Guys?
Speaker 7: My good friend Steven, He's gonna talk to us tonight.
Speaker 7: It's awesome. I'm Bennett from the Broadcasting Seeds podcast. You
Speaker 7: can find me at Broadcasting Seeds dot com or wherever
Speaker 7: podcast player that you like to listen to or you know,
Speaker 7: socials are pretty much all broadcasting seeds. I'm just happy
Speaker 7: to be here tonight.
Speaker 2: Awesome, Thank you sir and ty Ron. What is going on?
Speaker 8: What's up? Everybody? Appreciate it. I'm glad to be here
Speaker 8: as always.
Speaker 3: Everything that you can find on me is on my website,
Speaker 3: rebirthothword dot com. And you can get a copy of
Speaker 3: my book on Amazon, Journey through the Origins of History.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, check out that book. Thank you very much
Speaker 5: for coming on my man. I appreciate it. And finally
Speaker 5: the man himself. We got Stephen from the biblical Hitman.
Speaker 9: Uh.
Speaker 5: If you guys haven't heard it, go check out their
Speaker 5: channel and check out that. I think an interview dropped
Speaker 5: like last week with me on it. I think maybe
Speaker 5: around that time. Go check it out the guys guy
Speaker 5: meets Yo. You made the sickest reels for that Yo Yo. Like,
Speaker 5: I wanted to listen to that episode just from watching
Speaker 5: those reels and I hate listening to myself.
Speaker 2: That was impressive, So I'm not.
Speaker 9: I had Bob a lot when I'm making these reels,
Speaker 9: and I get the music going and I just I
Speaker 9: get in tune with it. I don't know, this is
Speaker 9: a lot of fun.
Speaker 5: I was like, yo, he makes me look like I'm
Speaker 5: like important, like I have something to say.
Speaker 2: I was like, fuck, thank you.
Speaker 9: But we're talking about the frequencies and stuff and the
Speaker 9: motes and all that, you know, compressing it in a box.
Speaker 9: And I was like, dude, this is this is a banger.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 5: So please let everybody know what your deal is and
Speaker 5: where they can find your amazing work.
Speaker 2: And you do have two other co hosts, correct, so
Speaker 2: I mean, you.
Speaker 9: Know, yeah, yeah, and shout out to Taylor. He does
Speaker 9: some of the graphic design and transitions with the shorts
Speaker 9: and stuff like that. I kind of edit down the
Speaker 9: you know, the script of it pretty much and what
Speaker 9: I send to him. He doctors up real nice and
Speaker 9: we get it out on our platforms. But we also
Speaker 9: have Jesse as a part of the show as well.
Speaker 9: Taylor and Jesse, they're the two co hosts. I'm the
Speaker 9: main host of the show, Steven. You can pretty much
Speaker 9: find us on anywhere YouTube, Instagram, TikTok x, Facebook, and
Speaker 9: audio platforms as well, such as Apple Podcasts, Spreaker, and Spotify.
Speaker 9: Those are like the three main ones that pretty much
Speaker 9: everyone kind of at least where I get most of
Speaker 9: the analytics from, so I just kind of represent those,
Speaker 9: but you can find us on anything pretty much. Man.
Speaker 9: The Biblical hit Man.
Speaker 2: Awesome, awesome, thank you for coming on. I appreciate it,
Speaker 2: and thank you for having me on too. Like I said,
Speaker 2: that was a great, great show.
Speaker 5: So I mean, I guess AI, I'm assuming you know,
Speaker 5: well you already told me that's what it's about. But
Speaker 5: even going by the title, I would assume probably AI
Speaker 5: is involved in that. But what brought you, I guess
Speaker 5: to covering that.
Speaker 9: It's it's it's crazy man. Well, before I start, I
Speaker 9: just want to say thank you as well for you know,
Speaker 9: invite me on the platform, and thank you for everyone
Speaker 9: that's joining in to be able to sit down and
Speaker 9: hear my points of view of what I think might
Speaker 9: be going on. I'm not completely dogmatic on it, but
Speaker 9: I've done some research and that's just what I want
Speaker 9: to do, is just share it with other people who
Speaker 9: are like minded, kind of like me. You know, we
Speaker 9: all kind of see things in our own lens of life,
Speaker 9: if that makes any sense, and just with the things
Speaker 9: going on in the world, this is a lot of
Speaker 9: fun for me because I think we're actually changing the game.
Speaker 9: I think the nick that you know how your podcast
Speaker 9: is kind of rubbed off on me a little bit
Speaker 9: with the panel discussions, and people might might have different views,
Speaker 9: but at the same time, we're all establishing, you know,
Speaker 9: cordial relationships with each other. And with all the things
Speaker 9: going on, especially today, I think there's a lot of
Speaker 9: schism and course and things are getting amped up for
Speaker 9: crazy reasons. But we can all just come back to
Speaker 9: humanity right at the end of the day. But this
Speaker 9: all kind of started. Oh man, So this this started
Speaker 9: like five six years ago, and it just keeps, uh,
Speaker 9: it keeps getting added on to a little bit. Things
Speaker 9: keep changing, technology keeps growing, and when I think I've
Speaker 9: put my finger on something, it just kind of I
Speaker 9: just move it to the right a little bit. I'm like, nope,
Speaker 9: it's it's actually maybe this, or nope, it's actually getting
Speaker 9: to this.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 9: I can kind of allude to an idea of what's
Speaker 9: coming in the future, and this is why I kind
Speaker 9: of present this in a way to where it's like
Speaker 9: a hive mind concept, a global consciousness, and and how
Speaker 9: AI is going to play a big part in that
Speaker 9: and and how I think in the end goal of
Speaker 9: all of this, it's I think the the evil part
Speaker 9: of our reality wants to wants to disco our agency
Speaker 9: from our consciousness. That makes any sense. They don't want
Speaker 9: us to necessarily be the driver of the vehicle anymore.
Speaker 9: You could see too, how in government and anywhere in
Speaker 9: high places of authority in this world, you could see
Speaker 9: how they want to control us in some way, shape
Speaker 9: or form, you know. And it comes down to policies,
Speaker 9: It comes down to a lot of different kinds of logistics.
Speaker 9: But at the end of the day, they do want
Speaker 9: to kind of control the ninety nine percent. In order
Speaker 9: to do that, they make a lot of money, and
Speaker 9: pretty much everything is kind of based off money in
Speaker 9: our world. But this kind of started back real quick.
Speaker 9: I'm I'm a husband or a father, I'm a fireman, paramedic,
Speaker 9: been doing it for almost ten years now, too long. Actually,
Speaker 9: I have some history in vaccine research.
Speaker 2: You told me, and I'm not going to bring it
Speaker 2: over that shit. You told me. It was fun, right, crazy?
Speaker 9: Yeah, yeah, I saw a lot of things before they
Speaker 9: hit the social media outlets.
Speaker 5: Before it even was a problem, kind of which I
Speaker 5: fucking freaky.
Speaker 9: Yeah, you know I was seeing these things objectively, and
Speaker 9: you know I was pulling these things out of tubes.
Speaker 9: And again, I don't want to get censored here, and
Speaker 9: I don't want anyone to come after us. And I'll
Speaker 9: be really careful how I kind of explained some of this.
Speaker 9: But yeah, twenty nineteen, twenty twenty, right, we know what
Speaker 9: happened in that in that time. We know that the
Speaker 9: world was locked down. We know that this was talked
Speaker 9: about even ten fifteen years before it happened, in a
Speaker 9: project called Operation Lockstep, funded by the ROCA, the Rockefellers.
Speaker 9: It was funded by the Rockefellers in a way to
Speaker 9: where which a lot of these big families and a
Speaker 9: lot of these big tech giants or just elite giants
Speaker 9: in general, they fund a lot of things talking about
Speaker 9: scenarios that are to happen in the future, and they
Speaker 9: actually kind of end up happening. So when the whole
Speaker 9: world got into Lockstep and everyone was making the same
Speaker 9: to decisions, if you weren't a part of those decisions,
Speaker 9: then you were considered the private sector. And Prince Charles
Speaker 9: actually kind of made that brand popular the private sector.
Speaker 9: But when I was working in research, I saw a
Speaker 9: lot of things. I saw a lot of unethical situations
Speaker 9: going on, and you know, I saw a lot of
Speaker 9: things objectively with my own eyes before they even hit
Speaker 9: social media, like I was saying, And so I knew
Speaker 9: that there was an idea brewing. I knew that there
Speaker 9: was an idea that was behind the curtain and it
Speaker 9: wasn't being disclosed to anyone in the public. People were
Speaker 9: calling me crazy when I was talking about these ideas
Speaker 9: that you know, people were taking certain things to be
Speaker 9: a part of society, right, so we know that it
Speaker 9: was a social experiment in that aspect, right, people were
Speaker 9: you know, in order to keep your job, right, I
Speaker 9: mean I almost had to had to keep takes to
Speaker 9: keep my job. It was just kind of really stressful.
Speaker 9: It was tough to make decisions and we all had
Speaker 9: to to do what was best for us in our
Speaker 9: families in those times. And I don't blame anyone, but
Speaker 9: that's what kind of broke me into researching deeper thought
Speaker 9: of that concept. You know, what, exactly do the big
Speaker 9: tech companies and technology in general, You know, why do
Speaker 9: they Why are they obsessed with transhumanism? Why are they
Speaker 9: obsessed with living forever. Why are they obsessed with an
Speaker 9: idea of elysium? I don't know if you guys remember
Speaker 9: that movie with Matt with Matt dam you remember right now?
Speaker 2: Yeah, but I never swaw it, but I know what
Speaker 2: you're talking about.
Speaker 9: Yeah, Yeah, it was basically this place.
Speaker 6: There's a lot of ancient there's a lot of ancient
Speaker 6: ideas wrapped up in that elysium. Uh, sort of motif
Speaker 6: that a lot of people just miss because they're not
Speaker 6: looking at classical history, you know, so they're not really
Speaker 6: seeing the whole context.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 9: No, you're right, man, And I think what's funny, at
Speaker 9: least in the medical field, we say this a lot
Speaker 9: more like history repeats itself and I and I think
Speaker 9: it's it's coming down that road, if that makes any sense.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 9: It kind of like makes me think of the even
Speaker 9: just the onw Naki story, right, Uh, the onw Naki
Speaker 9: And I see you smiling. I knew it. I love it,
Speaker 9: you know, because I hear you talk about it a lot, brother,
Speaker 9: And it's cool because they they were using us to
Speaker 9: mine gold, right, and a big part of that was
Speaker 9: that they were in this in this concept of elysium right,
Speaker 9: and everyone outside of it was either connected to some
Speaker 9: sort of high mine understanding or concept because and I
Speaker 9: think that's what got integrated into ancient Egypt, right, And
Speaker 9: that's what got where this whole kind of slave system
Speaker 9: gets brewed up and brought up, where people are doing
Speaker 9: things because they're they're not necessarily told to do it,
Speaker 9: but they're doing it in a way where they know
Speaker 9: they're going to get a lot of benefits from it.
Speaker 9: And so actually studying bees and studying the queen and
Speaker 9: what she does, she sends pheromones out, she sends all
Speaker 9: of these kinds of you know, even vibrations to where
Speaker 9: the worker bees when they are locked into that one consciousness,
Speaker 9: the worker bees actually think they're getting a benefit out
Speaker 9: of what they're doing. And so that's like this idea
Speaker 9: right of this hive mind consciousness. And it makes me
Speaker 9: think of Atlantis. I know Atlantis. People have different interpretations
Speaker 9: of it.
Speaker 6: Well, you'll love this. So have you ever heard of
Speaker 6: the Melisa These were the priestesses. These were the priestesses
Speaker 6: at the oracle at Delphi, and Melisa means honey in Greek, right,
Speaker 6: So they were the queen bees of the hive operating
Speaker 6: at a place where people were getting oracles from the outside.
Speaker 6: So there's a hive mind concept right right there. And
Speaker 6: at Delphi they had a stone that they called the
Speaker 6: Omphalus or the navel of the world, and so at
Speaker 6: the very center of everything, that's where the hive mind starts.
Speaker 6: So it's it's really interesting when it comes to that stuff.
Speaker 6: And the stone looked like a beehive.
Speaker 5: You you know what, you know, what's weird to understand
Speaker 5: the way they would judge if those people, if those
Speaker 5: women were actually saying something legit is it had to
Speaker 5: be a hexameter, and that's exactly how a beehive is
Speaker 5: even you know hex.
Speaker 6: Hexameter.
Speaker 9: Well, i'll tell you what what's crazy too, is when
Speaker 9: you look at a beehive, you know what the structure
Speaker 9: of it is a honeycomb structure, right, So it's a
Speaker 9: six sided figure, which if you will get into it
Speaker 9: later here in this in this little you know, presentation
Speaker 9: doing or whatever, but it actually comes down to it's
Speaker 9: the same structure as carbon. It's the same exact structure
Speaker 9: as carbon, right, carbon has right, right, and it has
Speaker 9: six protons, six neutrons, six electrons, and it actually.
Speaker 2: Yeah, six sixty six, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 9: So I think that's going to be a part of
Speaker 9: like this this idea.
Speaker 2: Of wait to use that sample. That's awesome.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 9: It just makes me think like this is a contributing
Speaker 9: factor to maybe what the Bible says in this concept
Speaker 9: of a mark of the mark of the beast. Right,
Speaker 9: what makes us free is our agency over our consciousness,
Speaker 9: and I think they're actually trying to attack that. So
Speaker 9: when I was doing this research trying to find out
Speaker 9: what what else, you know, what properties are in medicine,
Speaker 9: what things are in medicine that are not closed to us,
Speaker 9: And I started finding out that there's just a lot
Speaker 9: of things that pertained to just metals, for example, and
Speaker 9: so I was like, okay, metals. So then I started
Speaker 9: digging into different kinds of metals, and then there's actually
Speaker 9: certain things such as you know, graphite, graphene, things like that.
Speaker 9: And coming across that, I came I came into a
Speaker 9: World Economic form Insight report. And this was around the
Speaker 9: time too, This is like twenty twenty two when Klaus
Speaker 9: Schwab was like being talked about in every conspiracy platform
Speaker 9: all over the place. Right, this guy had a crazy
Speaker 9: German accent and he.
Speaker 1: Was dressed like a klingon.
Speaker 5: Yeah, oh you remember that one.
Speaker 9: Yeah, it was like some sort of toga right or something.
Speaker 5: You hope he was black and I had like a
Speaker 5: gigantic endy totally would have fit, right.
Speaker 9: Yeah. Yeah, it's crazy man. And the insight report I
Speaker 9: came across and it's called Advancing Digital Agency The Power
Speaker 9: of Data Intermediaries. This was an interesting read. It's a
Speaker 9: little over forty pages, but my goodness, everything that they're
Speaker 9: talking about in this we're starting to kind of see
Speaker 9: the precursors in our world today, and even our politicians
Speaker 9: that we've voted in because we got beat up for
Speaker 9: the last four years. The politicians we have in now
Speaker 9: are actually making this extremely possible. So which is crazy
Speaker 9: because it's I mean, in the political realm that's pretty tactical.
Speaker 9: That's tactically smart to do is to run the good
Speaker 9: cop bad cop idea to get people in office so
Speaker 9: that you can actually pass things through legislation, you know,
Speaker 9: and get things, you know, just slip it underneath the people,
Speaker 9: because that's just in a way, we're we're the enemy.
Speaker 9: I guess I don't know, if I don't want to
Speaker 9: say that, But but were the people that at least
Speaker 9: push push back or where we questioned things that makes
Speaker 9: sense a word, Yeah, I know, not enemy, but you
Speaker 9: know it's yeah side at least, but yeah, exactly.
Speaker 8: In this adversary I was thinking of that too.
Speaker 9: Yeah, But in this insight report, it talks a lot
Speaker 9: about It talks a lot about the blockchain, it talks
Speaker 9: a lot about merging technology and biologics, it talks a
Speaker 9: lot about binary code. Pretty much everything talked about in
Speaker 9: this is in the symbolism of the Trump Abraham Accords coin.
Speaker 9: I don't know if you guys have ever seen that before,
Speaker 9: which it's kind of interesting. The back of that coin. Yeah,
Speaker 9: it's got weird, crazy symbolism. It's got satellites, it's got
Speaker 9: you know, a little you know thing on there, it's
Speaker 9: got binary code, it's got saturn, it's got all kinds
Speaker 9: of stuff. It looks like a ripple symbol, which is
Speaker 9: interesting XRP, all that kind of stuff. But anyways, in
Speaker 9: this Insight report, it gets into a digital id system
Speaker 9: and what a digital identity is consisting of what it
Speaker 9: looks like and how much we actually interact with it
Speaker 9: every day and we have a digital idea. It's called
Speaker 9: our cell phone right now. They actually tell you this
Speaker 9: in the in the Insight report that our cell phones
Speaker 9: are our digital ID. And it's so funny because I
Speaker 9: remember when the iPhone came out, iPhone three I think
Speaker 9: it was or something, and then you know, the four,
Speaker 9: the five, and then I think the six took the fingerprint,
Speaker 9: and then the seventy eight, and then the the nine
Speaker 9: took like your you know, your your facial scan and
Speaker 9: you know now where we're at. I think it actually
Speaker 9: is scanning our eyes. Yeah, you know, because it it
Speaker 9: gathered a lot of data and information from us, especially
Speaker 9: during twenty nineteen and twenty twenty two when we were
Speaker 9: wearing masks all the time. You know, we were actually
Speaker 9: getting into our phones with masks on our face. So
Speaker 9: it wasn't entirely taking in the whole facial structure of everything.
Speaker 2: No, I definitely think that's yeah.
Speaker 9: And you please, guys cut me off at any time.
Speaker 7: Biometric data just right, you can tell what's wrong with somebody.
Speaker 1: You know, it's crazy. It's the stuff that they can
Speaker 1: stand anyway.
Speaker 8: I think too.
Speaker 9: You know, with our cell phones a big thing. Not
Speaker 9: only is it pulling data from everything that we do,
Speaker 9: because it's it's got all the senses that we have
Speaker 9: pretty much as people, except for consciousness, and it's it's
Speaker 9: building a model of us in a little file somewhere
Speaker 9: that's probably being stored in Project stargate somewhere. Pallunteers an
Speaker 9: obvious tool for them to build up a predicated program
Speaker 9: to where now they can maybe predict things that you're
Speaker 9: gonna do, and which is fuckingest. Yes, it's like minority Report.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well that was even something that came out of
Speaker 5: Trump's mouth word for word.
Speaker 2: I remember when I heard it.
Speaker 5: I was just like, yo, that is weird, Like that
Speaker 5: freaked me out, And I was like yo, of course,
Speaker 5: you know, none of the Trump people want to acknowledge
Speaker 5: that he says anything wrong, so nobody says.
Speaker 2: Anything about it.
Speaker 5: But I was just like, yo, that is fucked up, dude,
Speaker 5: Like I'd rather you probably pass like another gunlow, It's
Speaker 5: still let us have a free crime, Like I mean,
Speaker 5: I not that I want either one, but fuck, like
Speaker 5: what the right right? So what if I just like
Speaker 5: think about like I hate this moch like I at
Speaker 5: that case, I could get locked up while I'm on
Speaker 5: the podcast. I could hate the guests I have on
Speaker 5: and like because I'm thinking I like to smack the
Speaker 5: shit out of them.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna get locked up, like you know what I'm.
Speaker 9: Saying, Yeah, yeah, I know?
Speaker 8: And what if?
Speaker 9: Like what's interesting too? In this Insight report, it talks
Speaker 9: a lot about the computing of machine thinking and human thinking,
Speaker 9: and they advocate for machine thinking more than human thinking.
Speaker 9: So just in the healthcare system. I heard this the
Speaker 9: other day, RFK, doctor Oz, and Trump all on the
Speaker 9: same panel talking about the mergence of artificial intelligence and
Speaker 9: healthcare and how fuck it crazy how they are being
Speaker 9: advocates for artificial intelligence dictating what's wrong with you over
Speaker 9: a doctor that's been doing it for fifty sixty seventy
Speaker 9: years now. There are some pros and cons with the
Speaker 9: artificial intelligence, but me being in the medical field, that
Speaker 9: kind of scares me because when I take a picture
Speaker 9: of your heart, I'm the one that interprets that twelve lead.
Speaker 9: The machine interprets it for me as well, but sometimes
Speaker 9: it's wrong. And that's why I teach my paramedics at work.
Speaker 9: I'm like, hey, some don't trust the machine, trust your instincts,
Speaker 9: trust you know, treat the patient, not the monitor, if
Speaker 9: that makes any sense.
Speaker 3: So so it would probably be it would be more
Speaker 3: like a guide Dan like, like the human factor would
Speaker 3: be the trust but verify factor.
Speaker 8: We trust the AI to do it, but now we
Speaker 8: have to.
Speaker 3: Verify it on the human side, meaning they still need
Speaker 3: to have somebody who can still do that job. After
Speaker 3: that AI, Yeah, we'll get a quick synopsis so that way,
Speaker 3: you know, they can say, Okay, hey, this person might
Speaker 3: have a tumor here, this, that and a third and
Speaker 3: the doctor says, no, that's not a tumor, that's something
Speaker 3: else that's assist you know, And this is how I
Speaker 3: can tell you and that and and and and.
Speaker 1: That and that and you know.
Speaker 3: And the only reason why I say that is because
Speaker 3: I think it's going to get to the point where.
Speaker 8: AI will take over.
Speaker 3: Majority of what we're doing, but there's always going to
Speaker 3: have to be somebody that has to verify the stuff
Speaker 3: behind it. And in reality, you know, I'm not saying
Speaker 3: that AI is good. I don't I don't know if
Speaker 3: it's good or bad because I you know, I grew
Speaker 3: up watching Terminator, so I can just tell you what
Speaker 3: I feel.
Speaker 8: About that, right, But.
Speaker 3: You know what I'm saying, but I have to say
Speaker 3: from personal experience, like I have a brain injury. I
Speaker 3: was wounded in combat and I have a moderate traumatic
Speaker 3: brain injury. I used grammarly, which is it's not AI,
Speaker 3: but it's a type of an AI.
Speaker 8: I guess you can say.
Speaker 3: To help me write my book, because I needed to
Speaker 3: put things in words like I would be able to
Speaker 3: dictate it and have it come up on Microsoft Word.
Speaker 3: Then I would ask, you know, because the way I speak,
Speaker 3: and sometimes I have to think and sometimes the words
Speaker 3: that I might misuse in certain because I had to
Speaker 3: really I had to learn how to retalk, learn how
Speaker 3: to speak again.
Speaker 8: I had to go to speech therapy before about a
Speaker 8: year after I got wounded.
Speaker 3: So I wanted to make sure that I said the things.
Speaker 3: But I always read the work afterwards. You see what
Speaker 3: I'm saying. So if I needed help, but no different
Speaker 3: than what an editor. If I would have paid an
Speaker 3: editor to take my work and say, hey, okay, this
Speaker 3: paragraph might need to be reworded because of this, that
Speaker 3: and the third, and then me and the editor would
Speaker 3: go back because I would tell the editor my personal
Speaker 3: feelings and what I'm trying to create and that's the
Speaker 3: same thing with AI. But when you say, like with
Speaker 3: the medical field, that's interesting because you know, even doctors
Speaker 3: get things wrong on occasion, and you know some people
Speaker 3: you hear people say, hey, well I'm going to go
Speaker 3: get me a second opinion, a third opinion. And I
Speaker 3: don't think anybody should rely just on one one opinion
Speaker 3: based you know what I mean, You should get.
Speaker 8: On different things.
Speaker 3: But AI, I think you're definitely wrong, right, I'm sorry
Speaker 3: about something.
Speaker 8: And I say that because AI was wrong about something.
Speaker 1: The other day.
Speaker 3: My kids was playing in the yard and one of
Speaker 3: them got bit by a bug, and I went and
Speaker 3: you know, I just wanted to see what chat GPT
Speaker 3: would say, right, you know, that's part of AI. I
Speaker 3: took a picture of it and sent it to it,
Speaker 3: and he gave me some weird things from anything from
Speaker 3: a black widow bite to a brown racouse bite to
Speaker 3: a certain type of ant bite and certain stuff. And
Speaker 3: they all said the same thing, that the symptoms were
Speaker 3: or the the characteristics would be, like a bullseye bite
Speaker 3: or something like that. And I just wanted to make
Speaker 3: sure just to see what it was. I knew, I
Speaker 3: knew what kind of bugg it was. It was an ant.
Speaker 3: It was like a little small ant. But I wanted
Speaker 3: to see what chat chipet chat ChiPT would say because
Speaker 3: you know, you could get send the pictures in it,
Speaker 3: and it gave me all kinds of different things. So
Speaker 3: just imagine, you know, the craziness that would go through
Speaker 3: people's head when they hear from an AI I got
Speaker 3: bit by this or you know something like that. Even
Speaker 3: with the coral coral snakes and the coral snakes, you
Speaker 3: know how the different patterns on the snake, you know,
Speaker 3: the bites could be similar, but the patterns we could
Speaker 3: determine if it was if it was uh, you know,
Speaker 3: snake that could hurt.
Speaker 6: You or not. All right, But there's there's also the
Speaker 6: factor of the ancient knowledge of healing, which is love
Speaker 6: of intuition and healing. Right, that's the ancient triad of healing.
Speaker 6: And you can't get that with the machine. Right, These
Speaker 6: things that go along with our intuition can't be translated mechanically,
Speaker 6: and nobody in the AI field seems to want to
Speaker 6: even acknowledge that such a thing could exist, because we're
Speaker 6: all just sort of machines anyway. That's kind of scary
Speaker 6: because we're not just machines and we know that everybody
Speaker 6: knows that, So what are we what are we doing here?
Speaker 6: Healing isn't something that really goes along with the ideas
Speaker 6: of thermodynamics, you know, the second law.
Speaker 8: What's happening?
Speaker 6: Who knows? But we are getting better and there should
Speaker 6: be something that goes along with the human factor in
Speaker 6: human healing. And I think that's just completely missing from
Speaker 6: all of the AI sort of talk about medicine and AI.
Speaker 9: You know, yeah, yeah, I think with what's going to
Speaker 9: be the decision factor when for example, like like biblically right,
Speaker 9: like it says, for example, you know, all the kings
Speaker 9: of the Earth, they turn all their power into the beast,
Speaker 9: which they they kind of like submit their their right
Speaker 9: to rule to this idea, right, And if I compare
Speaker 9: that with today, it kind of makes me think, Okay, well,
Speaker 9: what if the kings of the Earth or whoever's in charge, right,
Speaker 9: whatever kind of elites they are, they they submit their
Speaker 9: power to artificial intelligence. But the only, the only, the
Speaker 9: when factor for that I think is going to be
Speaker 9: a GI. I'm sorry, as I so there's there's there's
Speaker 9: artificial intelligence now then there's going to be artificial general intelligence,
Speaker 9: and then there's going to be artificial super intelligence, which
Speaker 9: is like basically the the intelligence of the God of
Speaker 9: the universe or something like that. You know, I don't
Speaker 9: I don't know. What I'm saying is that it could
Speaker 9: I think they could be deceived into doing that for
Speaker 9: the wrong reason that makes any sense, you know, Like
Speaker 9: like they're going, yeah, I think they think it's got
Speaker 9: all the answers of the world, and they're like, hey.
Speaker 1: We have we have to do this, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: It's like how people go to Groc today and ask
Speaker 3: it a question just to see if somebody's saying something
Speaker 3: correctly or not, you know, And and you know, honestly,
Speaker 3: you know, I've tested this plenty of times.
Speaker 8: On both Groc and chat shipt.
Speaker 3: I would read something interesting in the book, type it
Speaker 3: word for word and chatch BT and rock see and.
Speaker 8: Ask you, hey, is this is this uh accurate?
Speaker 3: And as they'll say no, and I'll say, well, what
Speaker 3: about you know, if it came from Samuel Noah Kramer,
Speaker 3: And they'll be like, well, that's possibly correct. Well, I said,
Speaker 3: that's what exactly Samuel Noah Kramer says in his book
Speaker 3: and he is the you know, the go to man
Speaker 3: for this field, and then they'll be like, oh yeah,
Speaker 3: you might be right, and I'm just like.
Speaker 8: See that's you know, sometimes you got to ask it
Speaker 8: the right questions, you know what I'm saying. This is
Speaker 8: a great example. I was just thinking about this the
Speaker 8: other day at GPT and Rock and all that other shit.
Speaker 3: Is almost like the genie in the bottle when you
Speaker 3: get your three wishes, be careful what you ask, and
Speaker 3: that's it.
Speaker 8: Yeah, gotta be sure.
Speaker 6: A pedantic reader is the enemy of AI. A person
Speaker 6: who knows his text is always the enemy of AI
Speaker 6: because they're always trying to generalize, always trying to go
Speaker 6: into you know, very little detail, way too many generalizations.
Speaker 9: So right, I think that's why, for you know, Fahrenheit
Speaker 9: four fifty one could be possible in the future if I.
Speaker 9: If AI has that type of authority and is printing
Speaker 9: all the books, there's no more authors anymore because they're
Speaker 9: they're they're putting in movie scripts and they're putting in
Speaker 9: a book ideas to write then these things. Then AI
Speaker 9: would have the authority over everything. And maybe it just
Speaker 9: depends on the political views of it.
Speaker 7: Just creates its own translations of things, right, so it
Speaker 7: could change anything. That's one of the Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 7: I don't want to go down a rabbit hole, but
Speaker 7: this is one of the reasons. Like I can't get
Speaker 7: past the fact that they don't teach cursive writing in
Speaker 7: school anymore because.
Speaker 9: A foreign language.
Speaker 7: Right, yeah, right now, like two of my kids like,
Speaker 7: oh my god, like, what do you mean you can't
Speaker 7: read cursive? Or they can because I've made them, but like,
Speaker 7: if you can't read or write cursive, you can't read
Speaker 7: the founding documents. So in turn, if you allow something
Speaker 7: that is just and let's be honest, if you look
Speaker 7: at AI, and this is a great point, it's lazy.
Speaker 7: It's lazy like us, right, So in turn, what ends
Speaker 7: up happening is you get have answers, or you get answers.
Speaker 1: That are lazy.
Speaker 7: They're not they're not thought out because they can't really think, right.
Speaker 7: It just gives you lazy answers or lazy translations.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I think you're right Steven with.
Speaker 7: The as I for sure, because right now chat GPT,
Speaker 7: like people give it so much credit, or people give
Speaker 7: AI a lot of credit, but the stuff that's commercially available.
Speaker 7: It's pretty dumb in the grand scheme of things, right,
Speaker 7: And you can use it as a force multiplier for sure,
Speaker 7: and I do consistently, but it has its limits and
Speaker 7: you have to.
Speaker 1: Train it, right.
Speaker 6: So yeah, well I found out I found out something
Speaker 6: interesting about the AI generated photos. It's a lot more
Speaker 6: like scrying, you would believe. What they do is they
Speaker 6: take the natural static of the universe, right, that's the
Speaker 6: basic layout, and then it starts to add pieces to
Speaker 6: all of the static that's in the thing, and then
Speaker 6: it determines whether or not that applies to the prompt
Speaker 6: that it's given. So it's based off of the general
Speaker 6: static of the universe as it's drawing the picture that
Speaker 6: you want to see. Yeah, there's a scrying element in there,
Speaker 6: I would agree.
Speaker 9: And some people debate like if well, I've had a
Speaker 9: guy on the show before. He's a neuroscientist, so he's
Speaker 9: very dogmatic on He's not dogmatic, but he's very particular
Speaker 9: with his views with consciousness and is AI consciousness And
Speaker 9: he he says AI is not consciousness. But I kinda
Speaker 9: I kind of agree with him. But I also think
Speaker 9: that the more it grows, maybe the more or the
Speaker 9: you know, maybe the more it can become consciousness, if
Speaker 9: that makes I.
Speaker 7: Would agree, I can say that right now at least
Speaker 7: again again we have to we have to delineate here
Speaker 7: because there's there's what we've got access to, and then
Speaker 7: there's what there's what is right, So we we have
Speaker 7: access to a very small fragment of what is actually
Speaker 7: available commercially. Right, But I guarantee you, guarantee you that
Speaker 7: there is a AI system somewhere with some sense of sentiency.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 7: I don't see how there couldn't be at this point
Speaker 7: where that is and where it's housed and what uh
Speaker 7: you know, access that actually has. I mean, here's here's
Speaker 7: one of those things, if if just to give people
Speaker 7: some some some things that are a really good writer
Speaker 7: and part two of his book series just came out
Speaker 7: on on Prime. But it's Jack Carr and his books
Speaker 7: The Terminalist started it all and then he's got these
Speaker 7: other books will come like his fourth book and I'm
Speaker 7: trying to remember which he talks about AI. He talks
Speaker 7: about a sentient program that the US government has.
Speaker 1: And Jack is a very diligent researcher. He was a
Speaker 1: Seal officer.
Speaker 7: And he's you know, he you know it's fiction, but
Speaker 7: yet he's one of the more realistic writers that I've
Speaker 7: ever read, and he talks about it like, you know,
Speaker 7: we don't we don't know it's there, but yet it's
Speaker 7: there and everything that we do, right, So.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just hope it's on our side.
Speaker 9: Well, I'll tell you what. How Yeah, and I think
Speaker 9: at some point it'll rebel Right. We see it in
Speaker 9: all the movies. The predictive programming is there. There's an
Speaker 9: idea of this happening. And this kind of gets into
Speaker 9: like are they doing are they initiating like the Tulpa effect? Yeah,
Speaker 9: I know, the Toulpa effect is to actually meditate and
Speaker 9: to actually bring in entities in the same room that
Speaker 9: you're in. But the whole concept of creating ideas, establishing beliefs,
Speaker 9: and then these beliefs become manifested. Will this happen because
Speaker 9: the whole globe is watching movies and seeing this happen,
Speaker 9: and they're they're carrying this idea of consciousness with them
Speaker 9: every day in their subconscious and they don't know about it,
Speaker 9: but they're contributing to it in a way. Right, And
Speaker 9: it's like when Artificial intelligence goes from AGI to ASI.
Speaker 9: It's it's in a way where and I don't know
Speaker 9: how many parents we have in the in the room tonight,
Speaker 9: but when when your kid grows up and they reach
Speaker 9: eighteen years old and they want to leave the house,
Speaker 9: they can. To me, that's ASI. That is when it
Speaker 9: becomes like, yeah, rights, the Singularity, right, yes, Singularity. It
Speaker 9: flicks you off and it goes, I don't need you anymore,
Speaker 9: thanks for all the programming, you know, like what us
Speaker 9: parents would be doing throughout their life. And then they
Speaker 9: walk out and you're like, oh dude, what did we do?
Speaker 9: It got in the car, drove off. I don't know,
Speaker 9: I've lost control, you know. Yeah, oh man, It's an
Speaker 9: interesting concept to think of.
Speaker 4: Man.
Speaker 9: But but I think that for example, like what does
Speaker 9: AI want to kind of do, at least from some research,
Speaker 9: I feel like it wants to it wants to or
Speaker 9: what would help and be supplemental for AI would be
Speaker 9: to mark everyone with the de side. This thing, we've
Speaker 9: we've heard a little bit of a precursor with RFK
Speaker 9: recently talking about it in the realm of healthcare and
Speaker 9: he's talking about wearables. He's talking about he wants every
Speaker 9: American to have wearables as soon as they're born. You know,
Speaker 9: a wearable would be something that either goes around your
Speaker 9: your ankle, your finger, your wrist, it could pertain to
Speaker 9: your clothing. It's something that literally retrieves and transmits body
Speaker 9: activity data all of the time, all of the time.
Speaker 9: And he's pushing it in the name of healthcare. That
Speaker 9: makes any sense. I don't think we're that far off
Speaker 9: from the chip like people trying to oh, we'll see that,
Speaker 9: which which is totally.
Speaker 7: The beast system in my opinion, as soon as you
Speaker 7: start getting what they do have. Some people already do
Speaker 7: have subdermal implants that you know, they can buy stuff with.
Speaker 7: They have like the chips that are on your credit
Speaker 7: card under the skin.
Speaker 9: Well, if you think about it, the repeaters are there.
Speaker 9: All we need is a transmitter. The repeaters are there
Speaker 9: with the five G towers. They need something to be
Speaker 9: connected with us that would transmit frequencies from to and fro.
Speaker 9: Obviously we have that, it's our cell phones. It's already here.
Speaker 9: It's just outside of the body. But what with this,
Speaker 9: with this idea of digital agency and machine thinking over
Speaker 9: human thinking, They want to put Siri in our body.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because I think they for convenience. Yeah, well I
Speaker 1: have that's how they're going to sell a.
Speaker 9: Siri, and they don't like that. I think they want
Speaker 9: Siri to have agency over us where they can flip
Speaker 9: a switch whenever they want, and which kind of flipping.
Speaker 8: I mean.
Speaker 9: That makes me think of an article I read in
Speaker 9: twenty seventeen that was a rat study, and the rat
Speaker 9: study was about, you know, graphinge being integrated with with
Speaker 9: the with the metabolism of rats to where they were
Speaker 9: able to flip the switch in the brain. That's what
Speaker 9: the actual article was called, and it was a Rockefeller
Speaker 9: found funded operation to where they were actually controlling the
Speaker 9: eating habits of these rats with technology and frequency. And
Speaker 9: it's an interesting thought because it provokes a lot of ideas,
Speaker 9: and in this Insight report it says it right here.
Speaker 9: It says, in the now, the digital ID is our phones,
Speaker 9: our browsers, our mobile devices, anything that we interact on
Speaker 9: a daily basis that is connected with the Internet of things.
Speaker 8: You know.
Speaker 9: The evolution of that is now taking that idea and
Speaker 9: bringing it to the cities. So we hear this actually
Speaker 9: in the public domain now where these are smart cities, right,
Speaker 9: and these ideas of smart cities have a future after that.
Speaker 9: And it says it literally in this document under the
Speaker 9: digital ID column, it says next level of data intern
Speaker 9: metiaries aka Siri would be embedded in the body. It
Speaker 9: would be your device, and it would be connect you
Speaker 9: to your homes and your cities. So this is like
Speaker 9: that hive mind concept that I'm talking about, where where
Speaker 9: we're connected on a conscious level, but we could be
Speaker 9: ignorant to it, if that makes sense, unless it gets.
Speaker 8: Yeah, because we know about it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, because we know about it, but a lot of
Speaker 3: people don't want to go out there and do it,
Speaker 3: Like they know about meditation, but how many people will
Speaker 3: really go out there and practice it?
Speaker 7: Mm hmm, Yeah, Well, I mean Neuralink has already started
Speaker 7: its PRIME study, which PRIME is precise robotically implanted brain
Speaker 7: computer interface right. Study is an investigational medical device trial
Speaker 7: to evaluate the safety and functionality of Neuralink's implant in humans.
Speaker 7: So the end when the study uses an N one
Speaker 7: end plant, which is surgically inserted into the brain's movement
Speaker 7: control region by a robot.
Speaker 1: That's happening.
Speaker 9: There. It's crazy how technology can merge with biology because
Speaker 9: we're a computer.
Speaker 1: We're going to the board.
Speaker 8: Yeah, it's compacting.
Speaker 3: I find that movie Transcendence from County Depp is a
Speaker 3: really good movie where we're going towards.
Speaker 8: If you ain't never seen that, go watch that Transcendence.
Speaker 9: Oh, I got to watch that. I gotta watch that.
Speaker 9: I love movies like that because I get to pick
Speaker 9: little things from it and you know, put it in
Speaker 9: my brain, which I shouldn't do anymore. But so so
Speaker 9: when I read that, when I read that there would
Speaker 9: be devices put in the body, I said, okay, let
Speaker 9: me investigate that. Let me research about that. You know,
Speaker 9: I came across the patent when I simply typed it in.
Speaker 9: I said, you know, I was like device or patents
Speaker 9: that will include technology in the body. There was a
Speaker 9: lot of fact checking things that popped up obviously before
Speaker 9: I rabbit holed through all that and found this patent.
Speaker 9: But I came across this patent and it's it's got
Speaker 9: an interesting number to it. It was created by Microsoft
Speaker 9: in twenty nineteen, two months before what took place in
Speaker 9: that era to totally distract everyone off of what maybe
Speaker 9: you know from this being more of a mainstream, you know,
Speaker 9: talk of the town.
Speaker 8: So it's it's called.
Speaker 9: Where is it here? I have it right here. So
Speaker 9: it's called cryptocurrency system using body activity data. And the
Speaker 9: number of the patent is twenty twenty slash zero six
Speaker 9: zero six zero six. So in this patent it talks
Speaker 9: about answer that interacts with a device which then transmits
Speaker 9: to a cloud, and then this cloud collects the data,
Speaker 9: analyzes it, and then based off of the body activity
Speaker 9: data that it just you know, took from the user,
Speaker 9: it now rewards cryptocurrency. So I was like, that's insane.
Speaker 9: What does that mean. It doesn't say in the patent
Speaker 9: that that these sensors are in the body. It just
Speaker 9: as a sensor, right, just as a sensor.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 9: And it makes me think that this could be something
Speaker 9: to do with the financial system of our future. You know,
Speaker 9: we saw Trump not too long ago sign the Genius Act,
Speaker 9: which is funny because the etymology of the word genius
Speaker 9: can kind of relate to something of you know, Damon's Daimonion,
Speaker 9: demons gin, all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 6: It's a literal translation from the Greek to the Roman.
Speaker 6: So genius is the Roman version of spirit and diimon
Speaker 6: As is the Greek version, and I don't.
Speaker 8: Know reading the play those books and play those books.
Speaker 3: I had the privilege of reading all his books as
Speaker 3: available to us and him, and uh he says in
Speaker 3: Socrates says that demons are wise men or men who
Speaker 3: died honorably, and that's in there from I think it's
Speaker 3: from Kradalus c. R. A. T. Y l U s
Speaker 3: that book version. So yeah, they talk about how demons
Speaker 3: are wise men or honor or men who are who
Speaker 3: die honorably.
Speaker 6: Right, So we split in English, we split the idea
Speaker 6: of spirit and demon. Demon has the idea of being negative,
Speaker 6: but in the Greek it's keiko daimon as for negative spirits,
Speaker 6: daimon ase for just generalized spirits, and then aodaimonase for
Speaker 6: good spirits. So there's there's a dichotomy that's lost from
Speaker 6: all of these agent forms that we don't get today
Speaker 6: because we kind of split these up, you know.
Speaker 9: Yeah. Yeah, And what's the involvement with that, with this
Speaker 9: idea of within the Genius acts, it's talking about restructuring
Speaker 9: the entire financial foundation of the United States to be
Speaker 9: backed by stable coins.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Can I just say that Genius is an acronym. So
Speaker 7: it's guiding and establishing national innovations for US stable Coins Act.
Speaker 1: Just so everyone understands.
Speaker 9: Okay, gotcha.
Speaker 1: I'm a military guy.
Speaker 8: I know you know.
Speaker 1: Acronyms are our love language.
Speaker 5: So you could also use a former cabala with what
Speaker 5: that should do. Yeah that Actually there is a former
Speaker 5: cabala where it just takes the first letter of every
Speaker 5: not or a form of tamatra. I mean it takes
Speaker 5: the first letter of every word. There is a specific
Speaker 5: type that was even designed like that. So I've always
Speaker 5: wondered about, like what you're saying right now, I've always
Speaker 5: wanted some of those done on purpose to match.
Speaker 9: Yeah, I mean, isn't this all so interesting? So we
Speaker 9: know what Larry Fink said a few years ago that
Speaker 9: the future of the financial system of the world would
Speaker 9: be tokenization, and tokenization would be basically linked to the
Speaker 9: idea that you would own nothing and be happy.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 9: He wasn't a part of the World Economic form back then,
Speaker 9: but he's the CEO of black Rock, and which is,
Speaker 9: you know, the biggest asset manager of the entire world.
Speaker 9: They own everything. And the fact that everything then would
Speaker 9: be linked to a blockchain system and so again, so
Speaker 9: there's the idea of them putting something in the body,
Speaker 9: the idea that this sensor right has the ability to
Speaker 9: record and track body activity data. And so then I
Speaker 9: was like, well, what sensors are out there that are
Speaker 9: actually able to do this? And so I came across
Speaker 9: another patent here which actually talked This patent is basically
Speaker 9: like the new It's just an idea, but I can
Speaker 9: see it as being the new barcode system for buying
Speaker 9: and selling in the future, and it deals with quantum dots.
Speaker 9: Quantum dots was another funded operation back in twenty seventeen
Speaker 9: by Bill Gates at MIT, and they were actually putting
Speaker 9: quantum dot tattoos on people to hold records, right to see.
Speaker 9: And it was tracked by bioluminescence, by the way, which
Speaker 9: is another interesting crazy thing because our phones can constant
Speaker 9: be updated to increase their capabilities. Right, Like we remembered
Speaker 9: how how I was saying earlier, we used to scan
Speaker 9: our thumb. Now it scans our face. Now it probably
Speaker 9: scans our eyes. And it actually you know, uses infrared
Speaker 9: technology to do this. It could scan it in a
Speaker 9: pitch black room, right ye, And.
Speaker 1: I know for a ultra violent too.
Speaker 2: Just yes, ultra violet.
Speaker 9: Yeah, that's actually in this patent right here.
Speaker 7: Yeah, And then that's why I brought it up, because
Speaker 7: I know, bro, you and I researched too much of
Speaker 7: the same shit.
Speaker 9: All right, A little quick story how I actually found, dude,
Speaker 9: that our phones really have infrared technology. So I have
Speaker 9: PTSD a little bit, and I started to realize that
Speaker 9: when I had a baby, and my baby was like fresh,
Speaker 9: fresh baby, and I was just like she breathing, she
Speaker 9: breathing all the time, right, And so there was one
Speaker 9: night we were driving home from dinner and just my
Speaker 9: you know, I just my wife, Hey, can you just
Speaker 9: check on her in the back seat. I asked her
Speaker 9: to check on her in the back seat because we
Speaker 9: had a baby monitor that would pick up that when
Speaker 9: it switched into night mode. I'm bougie like that. For
Speaker 9: some reason, it would switch into night mode and the
Speaker 9: picture would be an infrared so I can see her,
Speaker 9: I just can't see if she's like breathing. So I
Speaker 9: asked my wife, Hey, can you go back there and
Speaker 9: check on her. The monitor was out. That's why I
Speaker 9: told my wife to do that. As she's shining just
Speaker 9: the low light from her screen like this on my
Speaker 9: kid's face. The monitor popped up and was working again.
Speaker 9: And when she was shining the back light of her
Speaker 9: not the actual flashlight, but just the back light on
Speaker 9: her face, it was strobing infrared light on the at
Speaker 9: the camera. The camera was picking it up because it
Speaker 9: could pick up those that type of light. I was like,
Speaker 9: are you taking pictures of her?
Speaker 2: Like what do you do?
Speaker 9: And she's like no, And I was like, dude, you're strobing.
Speaker 9: It's strobing back there in the on her and she's
Speaker 9: like nah. And then you know, we messed around with
Speaker 9: it when we got home and we actually were seeing
Speaker 9: that while yeah, our phone is flashing infra red light
Speaker 9: you know all the time, especially when it's trying to
Speaker 9: pick up your face. Which that was a conspiracy back
Speaker 9: in the day and fact checked and everything because I
Speaker 9: remember looking it up. But now I saw that it
Speaker 9: to be true, and it's just kind of nuts. But
Speaker 9: so so the graphing quantum dots, right, like, what is this,
Speaker 9: what's the purpose of it? This patent here is called
Speaker 9: using quantum dots for identification, authentication and tracking of objects.
Speaker 9: So with the identification part, I think that's something that
Speaker 9: we can make a connection with the other insight report
Speaker 9: that I mentioned earlier with digital ID right authentication another
Speaker 9: thing with digital ID and the intermediary that actually says
Speaker 9: you are who you are, because that's actually what your
Speaker 9: phone does. Your phone scans you and it actually says
Speaker 9: to the device, this is who is the owner of
Speaker 9: this phone it can open right, and the tracking of objects,
Speaker 9: So there's a tracking component of all this. This this
Speaker 9: patent basically goes over like a barcode system, from the
Speaker 9: beginning of the life span of a product. For example,
Speaker 9: let's say Coca Cola is making you know, a sixteen
Speaker 9: pack of coke, right, Well, they're actually going to start putting,
Speaker 9: They're not actually going to start doing, but this patent
Speaker 9: talks about that they are going to brand, right, They're
Speaker 9: going to brand the coke cans with quantum dots to
Speaker 9: authenticate that it was actually made at this facility. This
Speaker 9: is the beginning of its lifespan. And so and this
Speaker 9: the quantum dot technology is able to be put onto
Speaker 9: a QDX, which is a quantum dot ledger, right, which
Speaker 9: the ledger is then connected to the blockchain, and so
Speaker 9: it's in that stable coin. It's in that blockchain cryptocurrency system,
Speaker 9: it has the capabilities to link to it. And if
Speaker 9: you just take that concept right there and substitute human
Speaker 9: in place of a coke can, I think that's probably
Speaker 9: what this could migrate to in the future. And I
Speaker 9: say this because I think there's some interesting times that
Speaker 9: are to come where our identification and authentication will be tested.
Speaker 9: And the World Economic has talked about that. The World
Speaker 9: Economic Form has talked about this where they get into
Speaker 9: the idea of cyber attacks, and Klaus Schwab has even
Speaker 9: said it himself. He said that well in the scenario
Speaker 9: scenario report when they first did it twenty twenty called
Speaker 9: cyber Polygon, they reviewed and they dictated a bunch of
Speaker 9: different kinds of scenarios that cyber attacks would happen globally,
Speaker 9: and that this whole scenario would make what happened in
Speaker 9: twenty nineteen and twenty twenty look like a minor disturbance.
Speaker 9: Would it would look like something very very small in
Speaker 9: the spectrum of chaos, if that makes any sense. For example,
Speaker 9: imagine we all opened up our phones, the whole United
Speaker 9: States got hacked, and everything that we see in our
Speaker 9: bank accounts is zeroed out or we can't even get
Speaker 9: into our accounts, which d dawsing was in one of
Speaker 9: those cyber polygon scenarios. It's just detaching us from the server.
Speaker 9: We can't use it. Imagine we go from Fiat currency,
Speaker 9: which is paper right, tangible, I mean it's kind of tangible.
Speaker 9: It's still fictitious in my opinion, there's nothing backing it.
Speaker 9: But imagine we go to a system where all we're
Speaker 9: doing is paying with our phones, which the generations now
Speaker 9: are coming up and learning that that's all they really
Speaker 9: do because it's so convenient, it's easy. Even if you
Speaker 9: put your credit cards on your phone. It acts like
Speaker 9: it's on a blockchain system, which means it's encrypted, it
Speaker 9: can't be hacked. No one can steal your information, no
Speaker 9: one can steal your credit card number, all that kind
Speaker 9: of stuff. It's a different credit card number every time
Speaker 9: it's used. So if this is the idea that maybe
Speaker 9: what we will go to with a financial system in
Speaker 9: the future, that all we can do is pay with
Speaker 9: our phones, then cyber polygon will disrupt everything and authentication
Speaker 9: and identification would be the new system coming out after
Speaker 9: that that crisis. That makes sense, you know, where they
Speaker 9: have to now brand and people to actually know who
Speaker 9: they are. You know, duo authentication was not good enough,
Speaker 9: if that makes sense. You know, secret questions to get
Speaker 9: your password is not good enough anymore. They actually have
Speaker 9: to you actually have to share your biological data with
Speaker 9: servers now for them to know that you are who
Speaker 9: you are. I know, it's kind of just a wild
Speaker 9: concept that I thought about, but it seems to.
Speaker 6: Be supposedly right. So all of these things could be
Speaker 6: better encrypted, but they continue failing forward and not doing
Speaker 6: the type of encryption they need to do on the
Speaker 6: lower levels so that people can be secure in transactions,
Speaker 6: and they don't want to do it because they want
Speaker 6: to push us into a different system. And that's pretty
Speaker 6: obvious at this point. I mean, AI is basically a
Speaker 6: snake eating its own tail. And we see AI hallucinations,
Speaker 6: we see you know, them repeating facts facts that aren't real.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 6: It's it's this constant sort of incompetence to success that
Speaker 6: we see all across the government that they're now implementing
Speaker 6: with all of the AI programs and everything else.
Speaker 9: Yeah, it's again, this is all kind of heavy stuff.
Speaker 9: I apologize if I speak too fast or if I'm
Speaker 9: going too deep, and it's just kind of it's it's,
Speaker 9: it's it's stupid to be honest with you. I think
Speaker 9: it's something a good conversation to have. I think it's
Speaker 9: it's doable. Kind of, it's it's it's outside the sandbox
Speaker 9: for sure.
Speaker 5: You know, well, you know one thing, I'll just be
Speaker 5: really honest and not saying that you're wrong. But a
Speaker 5: lot of times whenever shit does end up like happening
Speaker 5: and changing, we always like i'd not a sort of
Speaker 5: come in that way though, you know what I'm saying, so,
Speaker 5: I mean, thinking of it, I mean, honestly, what you're
Speaker 5: saying right here, I mean does make a lot of
Speaker 5: sense to me.
Speaker 2: That will probably happen. And then of fifteen years.
Speaker 7: Yeah, well a lot of this is part of that
Speaker 7: agenda twenty thirty, right, a lot of this is so
Speaker 7: might not even be ten to fifteen years.
Speaker 6: Well, think about the transition from Internet one point zero
Speaker 6: to Internet two point zero, and they're they're now all
Speaker 6: everything is that you would want to find is now
Speaker 6: going to be on these social media platforms which are
Speaker 6: all centralized. And the original Internet one point oh was
Speaker 6: supposed to be decentralized. Everybody had their own website, they
Speaker 6: can design it themselves and you can go there and
Speaker 6: interact and all the rest of this stuff. But now
Speaker 6: it's all been consolidated. And that's sort of like the
Speaker 6: move of incompetence to success that we see happening over
Speaker 6: and over again. It's like what they try and do
Speaker 6: is they try to disadvantage the older systems that were
Speaker 6: probably more robust and better in terms of security, in
Speaker 6: favor of more centralization, and then once that centralization fails,
Speaker 6: then you've got more centralization. And then once that centralization fails,
Speaker 6: you've got more centralization. So it's this constant treadmill of
Speaker 6: them producing a product they know they're going to fail
Speaker 6: it at some point, and then giving them another product.
Speaker 6: And that's sort of like what they feel is the
Speaker 6: path to superintelligence, which if you think fail forward leads
Speaker 6: to superintelligence, you are moron.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 6: It's just it's not going to be what they think
Speaker 6: it is. And it's obvious because the people who are
Speaker 6: programming it behind the whole black box of what we
Speaker 6: see in front of our screens are not good people,
Speaker 6: you know, and they don't want the best for us,
Speaker 6: and they don't love us. And we think that because
Speaker 6: they've got these nice, you know, soft colors, that they're
Speaker 6: going to be nice to us. They're not going to
Speaker 6: be nice to us. That's just never been in the
Speaker 6: plan ever.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean.
Speaker 9: It's interesting too write uh like like these uh, these
Speaker 9: guys like Bill Gates, and I know, I know he's
Speaker 9: pretty popular one of them, but there's so many more.
Speaker 9: I've read it in a in an MSN article not
Speaker 9: too long ago. I think this had to be probably
Speaker 9: I don't know, three four weeks ago, maybe a month
Speaker 9: ago or something. And in the article it read that,
Speaker 9: you know he talks about he talked about in an
Speaker 9: interview where the smartphone era is coming to an end
Speaker 9: and it's going to be replaced with something very surprising.
Speaker 9: And so I started doing a little digging on that
Speaker 9: and I found this article here. And this article actually
Speaker 9: gets into electronic tattoos. It gets into it gets into
Speaker 9: like that that Cyberpunk, which is a pretty cool video
Speaker 9: game if anyone hasn't played it, but it's it's like
Speaker 9: that cyber Man.
Speaker 3: That game was so trash the first year, bro like Man,
Speaker 3: it was so broken. I was so pissed off.
Speaker 4: Bro.
Speaker 8: I couldn't even every time I tried to load the
Speaker 8: game up, it wouldn't even load up.
Speaker 3: You playing on the console PC, yeah, I was playing
Speaker 3: on I was playing on the PS five, bro.
Speaker 8: Oh it was.
Speaker 9: It was even worse on on on console. I had
Speaker 9: it on PC and I was like, this is this
Speaker 9: is laggy, and yeah, this guy was.
Speaker 3: Bad right and made the game bad, and then when
Speaker 3: they finally fixed it made you not even want.
Speaker 9: To play it, right, seriously, I actually returned it.
Speaker 3: I have I have my PS five right now and
Speaker 3: I don't even I haven't touched it since since then,
Speaker 3: like I tried to. But I'm sorry to get off conversation.
Speaker 3: But when you mentioned Cyberpunk, bro, that ship was like
Speaker 3: one of the worst dress and man, oh I was
Speaker 3: so hyped for it too.
Speaker 8: I was so hyped for it, man, But because of
Speaker 8: the Witcher three that's why. But that's it.
Speaker 9: Yes, But you know what's crazy in that game. They
Speaker 9: have electronics styles, tattoos that actually go on the side
Speaker 9: of your head, and these things can be upgraded, which
Speaker 9: I read in a few articles too, with crisper technology
Speaker 9: that they're at, you know, gene editing, is upgrades. The
Speaker 9: same kind of concept plays in that with that the
Speaker 9: cellular microbiology of our bodies, which is nuts. I mean,
Speaker 9: we're getting into I don't know if we're if history
Speaker 9: is like the technology of history is coming back in
Speaker 9: our day today. I just find it so interesting that
Speaker 9: two hundred years ago all this stuff kind of started
Speaker 9: and now where we're at today it's incredibly advanced. DARPA
Speaker 9: has technology that where they can grow insects around microchips
Speaker 9: and they could actually control these insects and they could
Speaker 9: actually use them to spy on people, which is wild.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 9: The technology is growing, technology is advancing technology even faster.
Speaker 9: And I think with at least some of the reading
Speaker 9: I've done, a lot of these people they don't really
Speaker 9: they have ethics, but their ethics are being tested and
Speaker 9: and and they're failing because they're getting God complexes behind
Speaker 9: what it is that they're achieving, and they're actually wanting
Speaker 9: to be God or God's or whatever that idea is.
Speaker 9: They want to achieve that that godhood in which in
Speaker 9: which way they want to it to go right, which
Speaker 9: is intimidating a little bit.
Speaker 8: Because it's funny because even in the ancient sex gods die.
Speaker 3: You know, even God can die, So I mean, why
Speaker 3: would you want to be a god if you can
Speaker 3: die anyway?
Speaker 8: And what is it that you want to be godly
Speaker 8: liked for?
Speaker 2: You know what I mean?
Speaker 8: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 9: In this article with the smart with the with the
Speaker 9: smartphones and the electronic tattoos, I just pulled it up here,
Speaker 9: so it says. It says smartphones have been an indispensable
Speaker 9: part of our lives for over a decade. From checking
Speaker 9: emails to scrolling through social media and navigating our daily routines,
Speaker 9: these devices have shaped how we interact with the world,
Speaker 9: but Bill Gates believes this era is nearing its end.
Speaker 9: According to Medium, Gates points to electronic tattoos, which are
Speaker 9: developed by Chaotic Moon and later required by a censure,
Speaker 9: as the next big step in personal technology. Instead of
Speaker 9: holding your phone in your hands, these tattoos could allow
Speaker 9: us to communicate, access the Internet, and even monitor our health,
Speaker 9: all without a screen in sight. And It says one
Speaker 9: of the key advantages are that these tattoos are integrated
Speaker 9: into the body. Imagine having a device that's embedded in
Speaker 9: your skin and it lets you interact with the world
Speaker 9: through simple gestures or touch. It's sleek, unobstructive, unobtrusive, and
Speaker 9: possibly more intuitive than anything we've ever seen before. The
Speaker 9: tattoos are powered by nine tiny nano capacitors could be
Speaker 9: quantum dot or graphene, and these do not and these
Speaker 9: don't require bulky batteries or displays, making them a far
Speaker 9: more subtle alternative to today's mobile devices. And I think
Speaker 9: that's where this hive mind kind of idea comes into play,
Speaker 9: because if you can and I think it'll be integrated
Speaker 9: with our visual cortex, I think we'll be able to
Speaker 9: see these things and think on what we want. Let's say,
Speaker 9: like a HUD display kind of pops up in your vision,
Speaker 9: or you see an email popped up and you look
Speaker 9: at it. Maybe you think you click on it it
Speaker 9: activates it. Or maybe I want to call Nick today
Speaker 9: and I pull up the phone book, click Nick, or
Speaker 9: maybe it just does it on its own. But it's
Speaker 9: all doing this because it's interacting with our computer system, right,
Speaker 9: our genetics, our DNA, cellular structure, all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 9: And they're able to do these things, which is interesting
Speaker 9: because I think it's going to come with a price.
Speaker 9: I think it's going to come with some sort of
Speaker 9: like a toxic load behind it, at least from me
Speaker 9: working in research. Everything has a toxic load no matter
Speaker 9: what it is that you put in the body of
Speaker 9: the body. If it's not natural to it, it takes
Speaker 9: a pathophysiological effect, and which is like a reverse condition
Speaker 9: that the cell kind of goes through and it causes
Speaker 9: either a symptom or an adverse event of some sort.
Speaker 9: But I think they're trying to narrow it down to
Speaker 9: a safe and effective you know, spectrum or range that
Speaker 9: makes sense, which we've we've heard that before, right, We've
Speaker 9: heard safe and effective before. So it's it's it's it's
Speaker 9: all interesting, man. I think, you know, I just think
Speaker 9: AI is is down the road, has come in to
Speaker 9: at some point, you know, put us in the backseat
Speaker 9: of our agency, if that makes sense. And just to
Speaker 9: think if that's possible is kind of wild. That's what
Speaker 9: happens to the worker bees. The worker bees are out there,
Speaker 9: they're doing their thing, they're actually going cross pollinating. They're
Speaker 9: they're working according to their design, and then when that
Speaker 9: queen bee releases those pheromones, boom, they don't make the
Speaker 9: decisions for themselves anymore necessarily and they they're doing with
Speaker 9: what the high mind wants them to do. We can
Speaker 9: see the crisises in the world today as well, where
Speaker 9: it could kind of push this idea for the world
Speaker 9: to come together. There's climate crisis, civil extraterrestrials are coming,
Speaker 9: which I think I think it was Reagan that said
Speaker 9: it in the United Nations. It's like this would be
Speaker 9: a threat to bring the whole world together. Yeah, something
Speaker 9: something's interesting about it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I I well, people call me a
Speaker 1: fed all the time.
Speaker 6: Because I do because I do.
Speaker 7: I do a lot of work still with the government.
Speaker 7: And one of the things that and I'm not going
Speaker 7: to go deep into because it's boring. It's not boring,
Speaker 7: but it's like we'll make people's head explode. And it's
Speaker 7: right along. It's an expansion even of what you're saying, Steven,
Speaker 7: and we're talking about like neuromorphic technology, okay, which is
Speaker 7: and computing and engineering which is based on the form
Speaker 7: of the human brain.
Speaker 1: And it's because as if we can.
Speaker 4: Go on it, we talk about God right and and
Speaker 4: how or whatever you believe on how we were formed
Speaker 4: and what it is.
Speaker 7: But the neuromorphic stuff will make it's absolute insanity because
Speaker 7: it's all based on the efficiency of our brain. Our
Speaker 7: brains are some of the best computers in the world period,
Speaker 7: hands down.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: This is why they're trying to make AI more like us,
Speaker 1: and they are.
Speaker 7: These are some of the things that like DARPA does
Speaker 7: and other SANDEEDA National laboratories and things. It's it's there,
Speaker 7: it's coming, but that ordinary person just can't wrap their
Speaker 7: mind around it. No ponent intended. I'm just saying they
Speaker 7: just stuff is going on that they have no freaking
Speaker 7: clue about.
Speaker 9: And what I think is going to like that that
Speaker 9: that will give this idea just a little push to
Speaker 9: get it to go. I mean, you know, Nick, you
Speaker 9: brought it up when we did an episode together. It
Speaker 9: was these frequencies, and I think there's like this old science,
Speaker 9: this old technology that is kind of maybe held at
Speaker 9: a higher level. Right, They don't want us to kind
Speaker 9: of understand it, right, they don't want us to understand
Speaker 9: these things, and maybe frequencies will play a big part
Speaker 9: in this. I mean, that's what they were sending into
Speaker 9: these rats with the graphine studies. They're manipulating either to
Speaker 9: starve this rat or to let this one eat a
Speaker 9: lot just with frequencies. I'm like, that's crazy, dude. You know,
Speaker 9: you guys know a lot more about the old world
Speaker 9: than I do, And I'm wondering does the old world
Speaker 9: have a play in this idea, even with just the
Speaker 9: concept of artificial intelligence? You know, if history repeats itself
Speaker 9: and nothing technically is like new under the sun, what
Speaker 9: was AI back in the day?
Speaker 8: You know?
Speaker 9: Was it the ancient gods?
Speaker 4: You know?
Speaker 8: Or Kassak records, right, you know?
Speaker 9: I mean could yeah, could could be?
Speaker 5: I mean I have wonder if AIS existed before and
Speaker 5: like somehow it got turned into some wild story that
Speaker 5: we misunderstand.
Speaker 9: So tell me about the acastic record a little bit,
Speaker 9: because I only know a little little bit about that well.
Speaker 3: Different I've read differently from different books, of course, but
Speaker 3: the basic is just like a call system of information
Speaker 3: from everybody and even yourself singularly. Now you can tap
Speaker 3: and tack it tap into your Acastak records. But then
Speaker 3: you know how some people are born in another lifetime
Speaker 3: and they have a different body or a different life
Speaker 3: in the past, and they have a new lifestyle now
Speaker 3: and they can remember their past life. As they say,
Speaker 3: that's tapping into their Akashak records. And then some people
Speaker 3: say that they were I know you've heard this plenty
Speaker 3: of times, I'm the reincarnate Elvis or something like that, right,
Speaker 3: and they're saying they had dreams and this that, and.
Speaker 8: You know, it's just different from everybody.
Speaker 3: But basically a cloud system of information basically, how I
Speaker 3: look at it also is the same way like when
Speaker 3: some of these inventors would meditate, you know, they would
Speaker 3: meditate and then they would come up with a crazy
Speaker 3: ass invention of some sort.
Speaker 8: Right, Like I know a couple of inventors that I
Speaker 8: that I like.
Speaker 3: They they would actually be able to take like a
Speaker 3: PC and every component in a PC. They would be
Speaker 3: able to take a part moving and all that.
Speaker 8: You know, how like in the old movies.
Speaker 3: They used to take the little parts off the screen,
Speaker 3: off the like, and they put their hands up in
Speaker 3: there and there's nothing in front of them but just
Speaker 3: like a holographic picture of something and they sitting there
Speaker 3: taking you know, moving pieces and certain stuff like that.
Speaker 3: That's basically, you know, it's just it's just like a
Speaker 3: like a cloud system basically, just everybody's able to tap
Speaker 3: into it. It gives you information from the past, future,
Speaker 3: and present.
Speaker 9: That's crazy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, like Jarvis probably like.
Speaker 8: Like a metal Jarv.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean it's something. It's basically it's different from everybody.
Speaker 3: But you have to tell there's no really real way
Speaker 3: to tap into it. The only way that I've really
Speaker 3: heard about it is anything that's like in a visual
Speaker 3: vision like state, like you know in the Bible, Ezekiel
Speaker 3: when he's seen the Ezekiel's wheel, he's seen that in
Speaker 3: a visual like state. And if you look up, like
Speaker 3: I like what you said about etomology, you look up
Speaker 3: the etymology of the word vision, it literally just means imagination.
Speaker 8: So something that's with an imagination that they've seen.
Speaker 9: Oh dude, you're you're blowing me away right now, because
Speaker 9: so so you watched the Avengers, right, like the Avengers
Speaker 9: Age of Ultron yep, right, So so in the movie
Speaker 9: Age of Ultron, they created you know, Tony Stark and
Speaker 9: the Hulk they created, Uh, they created Ultron to be
Speaker 9: the shield around the world, right, Like this this idea
Speaker 9: of the Savior, which I think AI can play both
Speaker 9: that could be Savior or doom. I actually saw that
Speaker 9: in the Frozen movie. The other day when my daughter
Speaker 9: was watching it. The little Snowman in the Frozen movie
Speaker 9: said it, and I was like, oh, shoot, he knows
Speaker 9: something I don't know, but that in that movie Disney, Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 9: But Ultron at the end of the day, he wanted
Speaker 9: to seek a body because you saw his progression throughout
Speaker 9: the movie as artificial intelligence growing getting bigger. His his
Speaker 9: platform that he was in the vessel would always get
Speaker 9: like double in size as the movie went. But he
Speaker 9: was He was the one that actually was creating the
Speaker 9: body of vision because he wanted to inherit it. So
Speaker 9: I guess the question i'd ask you guys is do
Speaker 9: you think it's possible when AI gets to that you know,
Speaker 9: super intelligent phase, that it'll want to maybe crave it
Speaker 9: to be in a body of some sort.
Speaker 8: Well, perfect, Yeah, of course. Let's look at it like this.
Speaker 3: I was telling you about the movie Transcendence by Johnny Depp,
Speaker 3: where he was able to put all his memories, his mentality,
Speaker 3: his personality and everything into the computer and he was
Speaker 3: able to tap into the network. I'll let you watch
Speaker 3: it from that point on, but think about it, we
Speaker 3: only miss something that we don't no longer have that
Speaker 3: we once had before, meaning that if we have a
Speaker 3: body now and we go into a hybrid more hybrid
Speaker 3: type robotic type body or four flashed robotic type body,
Speaker 3: people are going to say, I wish I had a
Speaker 3: flesh like I wish I could feel pain, I wish
Speaker 3: I could smell this, because you know, with certain things,
Speaker 3: once you get to that point, you won't feel the
Speaker 3: same exact thing. You were talking about AI, how it
Speaker 3: was creating movies and television shows, sometimes even music today
Speaker 3: that takes a soul, It takes the soul out of
Speaker 3: the song, the music and the movie. Think about how
Speaker 3: much people are using AI today and probably been using
Speaker 3: it for the last five, maybe even ten years, and
Speaker 3: we just we are now just are starting to afford
Speaker 3: it because in reality, the information, the AI that we
Speaker 3: have now is very expensive. You know, the average person
Speaker 3: can't afford, you know, to make those really good AI shows.
Speaker 3: But anyway, it's gonna get to the point where they're
Speaker 3: gonna want to go back to the flesh like type body,
Speaker 3: because people are always gonna want I mean, and I.
Speaker 8: Hate to say that, we're already there.
Speaker 6: People want to get away from its so bad.
Speaker 9: And some people are confused on what they are, but
Speaker 9: I'll just leave that at everyone's.
Speaker 5: At close your eards, look into the darkness, find the
Speaker 5: blazing storm.
Speaker 2: Focus on It'll be called the eclipse. Don't feel what
Speaker 2: the shuld you did?
Speaker 6: You want