Speaker 1: On this fine Tuesday morn as everybody freaks out over
Speaker 1: what Debbie's doing. Debbie now already having some impacts on
Speaker 1: the Piedmont region. Current Vice president and presidential candidate Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris had a rally for Thursday, Yeah, for Thursday, and
Speaker 1: added the new VP selection whomever that may be it
Speaker 1: was supposed to attend. That has been rescheduled. I think they.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you, I'll look and see if they picked
Speaker 1: a date already, but that's been rescheduled. So you know,
Speaker 1: if you're super excited about that, that's not happening anymore.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure that other things will stack up as
Speaker 1: we draw closer. And it looks like that Thursday into
Speaker 1: Friday at the current speed, excuse me, current speed is
Speaker 1: what we're going to be looking at now. As far
Speaker 1: as the running mate, there's a couple. It's really like
Speaker 1: a couple, but maybe it isn't. And here's what I
Speaker 1: mean by that, Like, over the years, there's been some
Speaker 1: some fake outs which I would do. I'm not gonna be.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna lie to you. I wouldn't. I would
Speaker 1: enjoy messing with the media, but that's just me and
Speaker 1: I'm a horrible person. And then I and then that
Speaker 1: decision to want to do that was reinvigorated as I
Speaker 1: was watching the Josh Shapiro stuff on on the Twitter
Speaker 1: this morning, So I don't know. Okay, So here's the deal.
Speaker 1: The rumor mills are it's the Pennsylvania governor and it's
Speaker 1: the Minnesota governor. And boy, oh boy, Tim Walls has
Speaker 1: always been a weird dude. Like I knew Tim Walls
Speaker 1: when I was still broadcasting in Minnesota. Obviously wasn't the
Speaker 1: governor at the time, Tim Poalenni was, and then the
Speaker 1: the trust fund kid of the Dayton Slash Marshall Fields
Speaker 1: family was then governor after he claimed he'd never do
Speaker 1: politics again because he's so hated being a senator. But
Speaker 1: that's another thing. Then we moved on to Tim Walls,
Speaker 1: and how do I say this? He didn't strike me
Speaker 1: as nutso as he obviously has ruled up there. And
Speaker 1: I got because I got a lot of Minnesota friends
Speaker 1: still like you would not believe what our governor's doing,
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. And then I tell him what Cooper's doing,
Speaker 1: and then we chortle. So there's a couple, but there's
Speaker 1: a couple of things going on that point to those two.
Speaker 1: One is you had the you had the super the
Speaker 1: super duper black suv contingent up around walls. Are they
Speaker 1: moving him? Do they transport him? Josh Shapiro's the governor
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania. The capital is Harrisburg. He is at a
Speaker 1: time when he'd normally be at the capitol, but he's
Speaker 1: back in was it mcgumber. It's a Philly suburb, but
Speaker 1: it's the really nice one where his home is. That's
Speaker 1: where he's you know, his actual home is. And of
Speaker 1: course the media is parked across the street, right, They
Speaker 1: got all the news vans there because they want to
Speaker 1: see the moment if, in fact he is that the
Speaker 1: contingent of Secret Service protection, which immediately installs starts hauling
Speaker 1: him around, and so oh in the mayor of Philly
Speaker 1: basically set at Shapiro, but also could be all part
Speaker 1: of the fake you don't know, don't know, Okay, So
Speaker 1: with that in mind, the media who's all parked there,
Speaker 1: they're not hiding, they're not in gilly suits, they're not
Speaker 1: using a satellite imagery or even a drone, right, they are,
Speaker 1: in fact, that is so nice. Sorry, somebody jacked with
Speaker 1: my my button bar thing. All right, well, we'll have
Speaker 1: to get to those here in the next segment until
Speaker 1: I can figure out what the heck's going on there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so like they're not hiding, they know they're there. And
Speaker 1: the video that's going around is how the Shapiro did
Speaker 1: what he always does. He returned home to his home
Speaker 1: and right in his front driveway there's a new basketball hoop.
Speaker 1: It looks pretty new to me, and he and the
Speaker 1: Golden lab and some sort of doodle or something that's
Speaker 1: a rescue and his son are out there just shooting
Speaker 1: hoops like they always do. And the media is positively
Speaker 1: giddy that they've caught this organic moment of the Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: governor direct, you know, fifty yards from all of the media,
Speaker 1: just you know, getting his cute dogs out and shooting
Speaker 1: hoops with his kid. And isn't that normal compared to
Speaker 1: a guy who told his seven year old to shut up?
Speaker 1: And then of course it's being presented as organic. It
Speaker 1: called me cynecal and I don't know, maybe Shapiro does
Speaker 1: shoot hoops with his kid. They weren't able to produce
Speaker 1: any other video that I saw, and at that level.
Speaker 1: And yes, this even goes for Trump. I just roll
Speaker 1: my eyes as to whether any interaction with family is genuine,
Speaker 1: so I tend to I tend to ignore it. You know,
Speaker 1: did did Vance tell his seven year old to shut up?
Speaker 1: I believe that to be more organic than the governor
Speaker 1: of PA, who, during a time when the governor is
Speaker 1: normally in Harrisburg, felt like he so needed to come
Speaker 1: and pet his cute dogs and shoot hoops with his
Speaker 1: son across the street from the media versus somebody telling
Speaker 1: somebody asking a question, like you know in him telling
Speaker 1: a story that just seems so normal to most people.
Speaker 1: But again, this is my cynicism. I hate to offload
Speaker 1: it on you, but basically I'm not buying it because
Speaker 1: I'm a I'm a big fat jerk, I guess so.
Speaker 1: Uh AnyWho, So that's uh, that's where we're starting this morning,
Speaker 1: and I want to get this audio, but unfortunately I
Speaker 1: have to fix this next gen, which I may do
Speaker 1: with a hammer and a big one like I don't know,
Speaker 1: like a mini sledge or something. So let me do this.
Speaker 1: We'll take a break. And uh, also, we got to
Speaker 1: I better do a correction from yesterday, which unlike a
Speaker 1: lot in the media. I will do happy to do it.
Speaker 1: I want to make sure that you're getting the most
Speaker 1: accurate information. And it has to do with with the
Speaker 1: uh with the the Kamala audio we played you yesterday
Speaker 1: and if you don't remember it, it had this one
Speaker 1: about the bus and then the word salad. Okay, so
Speaker 1: we will get to that. I'm gonna handle this and
Speaker 1: we'll regroup in a few And it's here on the
Speaker 1: CaCO Day radio program. I complete complete my thought here
Speaker 1: about all things Democrat nominees. So we don't know which
Speaker 1: one of them it's going to be. It's interesting because
Speaker 1: the logical choice, the most logical choice, is Pennsylvania. Except
Speaker 1: and if you remember, we were here for the moment
Speaker 1: when CNN was doing the thing during early speculation where
Speaker 1: they were sitting around very normally talking about I don't
Speaker 1: think we did rossh. We didn't rip that audio. I'm
Speaker 1: almost sure we didn't. I think I explained it because
Speaker 1: it was going on literally in the middle of the show,
Speaker 1: but they were just sitting around and like, I don't know,
Speaker 1: two weeks ago and they're like, yeah, Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania governor.
Speaker 1: And then one of the panelists is I you know
Speaker 1: he's Jewish. He said it more subtly than that, or
Speaker 1: he said it would create some additional complications, and then
Speaker 1: everyone just nodded their head like they understood, and it
Speaker 1: was clear what they were talking about is Josh Shapiro
Speaker 1: may not sell well to the you know, all the
Speaker 1: kids taking over Columbia University and all the others, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, they say they're going to do it again.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that story. It's the all.
Speaker 2: Important left wing death to America and the Jews.
Speaker 1: That's to America and the Jews.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yah, yeah, they're part of the electorate.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they don't feel that they'll be And I like
Speaker 1: how they're just like I've heard it say, they're like, well,
Speaker 1: there's equally the same amount of people on the right
Speaker 1: or don't like you. There's a lot of them. It's
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what it's. It's pretty wild to me
Speaker 1: how open a lot of people are. But it it's
Speaker 1: not mainstream, do you know what I mean. It's not
Speaker 1: treated as like CNN sitting there treating it going, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: well you got you know, you gotta carve out it.
Speaker 1: Isn't it interesting that in all of these countries, whether
Speaker 1: it's in Germany, whether it's up in Canada, whether it's
Speaker 1: in the u K. Right now, which is absolutely on fire,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to I don't I didn't want to
Speaker 1: touch this story, but we have to get to what's
Speaker 1: going on because they're running around arresting people for Facebook
Speaker 1: crimes right now in the UK. And if you don't
Speaker 1: know what's set all that off, it's a really really
Speaker 1: tragic story. But also it all of these governments. Was
Speaker 1: it France too?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: They did a coalition in France? Didn't Macrona have to
Speaker 1: basically because of the way that they, you know, works
Speaker 1: from a parliamentary standpoint, the what you would see as
Speaker 1: the Democrats, I guess, had to go out and strike
Speaker 1: deals with the death to Hamas people, or at least
Speaker 1: their version of it in all these countries to maintain
Speaker 1: power and also do some really sketchy stuff about elections
Speaker 1: that had literally already taken place. But they've had to
Speaker 1: form these coalitions, and it's happened in all of these countries, France, Canada,
Speaker 1: UK for sure, Germany I believe it did. And I
Speaker 1: think what was it Italy, they were talking about it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's came to pass yet, and
Speaker 1: so it is inarguable that the left has moved further
Speaker 1: left unless they're going to ignore that and then when
Speaker 1: the next votes called, they won't have their little cabal anymore.
Speaker 1: You know. Up in Canada, it's even more nefarious because
Speaker 1: there is no set election date. So like because of
Speaker 1: the coalition that was formed and it's large enough with
Speaker 1: all of the far far left, Trudeau doesn't have to
Speaker 1: call for an election for a long time, and he's
Speaker 1: not going to until probably another year unless something comes up.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of strategy because they want the maximum
Speaker 1: amount of time for that pole there or whatever his
Speaker 1: I should probably learn to pronounce his name. Opposition dude.
Speaker 1: They want as long as possible so that they can
Speaker 1: scandal him. It's really wild, man. So when if you're
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris and you guys are looking at who you're
Speaker 1: going to pick, and you recognize that there's a whole
Speaker 1: swath of individuals that if you pick Josh Shapiro will
Speaker 1: be problematic, and you'll talk about it like it's normal
Speaker 1: on CNN. Don't try to compare that to you know,
Speaker 1: Aryan groups or whatever. It's just not the same because
Speaker 1: I promise you that the polling place up in Quarterlein
Speaker 1: and Idaho isn't exactly a hotspot or an election turner,
Speaker 1: probably not even in the state of Idaho. Plus, Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris's husband's Jewish and a big fan of babysitters, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, Ross did. If you think about this,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris is Doug m. Hoff his first marriage. This
Speaker 1: is the story that came out. His first marriage dissolved
Speaker 1: because he knocked up his babysitter. You know that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was the babysitter right for Joe and his first family,
Speaker 1: she was the baby, so you know they're very pro
Speaker 1: babysitter over on the side. But regardless, regardless, the biggest
Speaker 1: stumbling block, the biggest stumbling block, I think, and I
Speaker 1: think it's probably clear, is is Kamala Right. We played
Speaker 1: that audio yesterday, we had some thoughts. I'm gonna play
Speaker 1: it again for it and it's just a couple examples.
Speaker 1: Here she is on the tarmac right when there's the
Speaker 1: most recent Here she is on the tarmac when the
Speaker 1: or no, I'm sorry, the other one's more recent. Here
Speaker 1: she is on the tarmac early Friday morning talking about well,
Speaker 1: now I know what she's talking about, but here here
Speaker 1: is that audio, and people are like, what what are
Speaker 1: you talking about?
Speaker 4: This is just an extraordinary testament to the importance of
Speaker 4: having a president who understands the power of diplomacy and
Speaker 4: understands the strength that rests in understanding the significance of
Speaker 4: diplomacy and strengthening alliances.
Speaker 1: This is an incredible day, Oh dear God. And then
Speaker 1: you know, in another and then there's another thing where
Speaker 1: she's talking about being unburdened by what has been And
Speaker 1: I didn't realize until yesterday she was talking about your money.
Speaker 1: How many of you were less burdened than you were
Speaker 1: twenty four hours ago with your retirement account. Doesn't it
Speaker 1: feel good to be less burdened? You not have to
Speaker 1: figure out how to spend it. You have to figure
Speaker 1: out what you know early retirement, right, you should consult
Speaker 1: a retirement expert. We have very fine retirement experts that
Speaker 1: advertise on this show, but you know, make sure they
Speaker 1: have that certification. There you go, there's my plug. So anyway, yeah,
Speaker 1: and people looking at that as just one of many examples,
Speaker 1: and then there's the really creepy bus comments, and she's
Speaker 1: in it. She's not trying to change mind. She's in
Speaker 1: a room with people that are firmly in her camp.
Speaker 1: So she's just talking about nonsense. Man.
Speaker 4: You know what also excites me? What I'm among the
Speaker 4: many things I'm excited about electric school buses.
Speaker 2: I love all drinks.
Speaker 1: School buses.
Speaker 4: I just love them for so many reasons. Maybe because
Speaker 4: I went to school on.
Speaker 2: A school bus.
Speaker 1: Raise your hand if.
Speaker 2: You went to school on a school bus.
Speaker 1: What are you talking about? And then the dude at
Speaker 1: the end who's given the choco choco chip reaction like
Speaker 1: when Biden's doing his thing. Now ros your theory is
Speaker 1: she's drunk, right, I.
Speaker 2: Don't want to know, Well, it was drunk or just stupid?
Speaker 1: Okay, we'll be either or or you know, wait, hold on,
Speaker 1: hold on, I got a third one for you from
Speaker 1: The Atlantic. Kamala Harris's viral moments are fun to watch
Speaker 1: because they show a serious person having well fun. She
Speaker 1: hasn't just reset the presidential election. Her oddball quirks and
Speaker 1: charms matched the cultural moment, so did you can know?
Speaker 2: It feels more like the joker, but oddball, the joker, oddball, right, Charmie.
Speaker 2: I saw a video somewhere poster where it was like,
Speaker 2: you know, the Joker, right before he blows up the hospital,
Speaker 2: and it was Kamala walking out to one for buses
Speaker 2: during last campaign and she's just laughing at nothing.
Speaker 1: Was she in the middle of the street with a
Speaker 1: button that didn't work, had a just saying just saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: that is kind of a an off putting scene. Unless
Speaker 1: you're the Atlantic, then it's uh, then it's a quirk.
Speaker 2: No, No, she laughs at like nothing all the time.
Speaker 2: That's like and once you see it, you can never
Speaker 2: unsee it, Like she just laugh on charms.
Speaker 1: You're gonna see a lot of the same stuff that
Speaker 1: you saw during twenty sixteen, twenty twenty, anything that's tried
Speaker 1: and true, whether it's the Shapiro thing where you know,
Speaker 1: get like these uh his leftists on they're like, look
Speaker 1: at it. It's just a regular guy gets the gets
Speaker 1: the golden lab out plays the ball with his kid
Speaker 1: right across the street for the media and not in
Speaker 1: the backyard where he could totally do it. But yeah, yeah, no,
Speaker 1: that's totally organic. Let's spread that around or and then
Speaker 1: we'll go, oh, look at that, and I bet Trump
Speaker 1: never plays ball with his kid, even though like a
Speaker 1: week ago they did that. You know, when Trump was
Speaker 1: in the cart following the well, there's more a week ago.
Speaker 1: But when he's in the golf cart after and you know,
Speaker 1: you see a lot of these videos come out where
Speaker 1: he's playing at one of his clubs, Other golfers see him,
Speaker 1: he tends to talk to him. The person in the
Speaker 1: golf cart playing golf with him is his son, Baron.
Speaker 1: You could clearly see him. So I don't maybe golf
Speaker 1: doesn't count as playing playing ball with your kid and
Speaker 1: there's no golden labs around. Do you remember the do
Speaker 1: you remember the month long freak out over the fact
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump didn't have dogs? I remember that. Remember
Speaker 1: that in twenty sixteen, they're like, could you vote for
Speaker 1: a minute, he doesn't have pets, and then they ramped
Speaker 1: up to where like he murders pets every morning when
Speaker 1: he gets up. Well, another one is you have to
Speaker 1: you have to let everyone who's freaking out and has
Speaker 1: TDS right now. You got to let them know that
Speaker 1: they're not alone. You're not alone. And adds how everyone
Speaker 1: else feels. So The New York Times was back at
Speaker 1: the well with the uh the moonbat preppers, which are
Speaker 1: my favorite, by the way, right, I don't remember. I
Speaker 1: wish there was some video audio I could play, but
Speaker 1: it's written here. I'm sure there will be. And if
Speaker 1: you don't remember what this is, twenty sixteen, Trump's about
Speaker 1: the time he secured the nomination. They were doing stories
Speaker 1: where they were interviewing like, you know, mystic crystal moonbats
Speaker 1: who live out in the woods for artistic purposes, who
Speaker 1: all of a sudden decided they got to prepare for
Speaker 1: the end of the world, right because day one Trump's
Speaker 1: hitting that button and global thermal nuclear war breaks out.
Speaker 1: And I always love these for two reasons. One the
Speaker 1: abhorrence by the individuals who are doing the prepping of firearms,
Speaker 1: which is great, and I can take inventory, by the way,
Speaker 1: if you're one of these moonbats in and around my
Speaker 1: neighborhood where there's a lot of them. Like local elections,
Speaker 1: ain't nobody I ever voting for. We're gonna win. But
Speaker 1: if you guys feel the necessity two prep and you won,
Speaker 1: don't change your mind on the Second Amendment, that's fine,
Speaker 1: you know, as principal position. Even if I disagree with it,
Speaker 1: that's fine too. I like the chili mac mrs. The
Speaker 1: there's a jalapeno burder thing, which is you get that
Speaker 1: and then you just kind of break it up. That's
Speaker 1: pretty good. Ross you have any requests for MREs from
Speaker 1: moonbats who don't like guns, because that's how that's gonna work.
Speaker 1: Have you ever eaten MRIs? You've had an opportunity to
Speaker 1: dine on some of those meals ready to eat?
Speaker 2: I have had one?
Speaker 1: Yes, Uh, what was you remember? Cheez tortalini? That one's
Speaker 1: pretty good. I don't know. We used to have a
Speaker 1: lot of MREs for like hunting camps, so I've eaten
Speaker 1: a lot of these damn things. So yeah, if you're
Speaker 1: one of my crazy neighbors who abhors guns and but
Speaker 1: you feel like you have to prep because Trump might
Speaker 1: be president again, uh, that would be good. A stair
Speaker 1: away from any of the seafood. There's a tuna one
Speaker 1: that's not good. I'm just making recommendations. This is not
Speaker 1: self serving at all. So you know there's a pro
Speaker 1: you know there was somebody who makes their own You
Speaker 1: can seal food really good if you know what you're doing.
Speaker 1: It's pretty crazy watching some of the people that do
Speaker 1: it all on their own because I know me and
Speaker 1: I just I would have trust issues with that, but
Speaker 1: ironically I would trust you know, the company making it
Speaker 1: for the military, which I don't know. Government's government, right,
Speaker 1: But like you can pretty much do that with like
Speaker 1: feasibly ross if you got good at it, you could
Speaker 1: make your own MRIs of nothing but olive garden stuff.
Speaker 1: That would be amazing, right, just the nukes are flying,
Speaker 1: you're in the doomsday shelter with the fam and chicken Alfredo. Again, absolutely,
Speaker 1: what are we doing here? So but I don't have
Speaker 1: the skill set for that, but some of you do,
Speaker 1: so that's good. Let's see. Yeah, stick with the beef
Speaker 1: and chicken. Stay away from lemon pepper tuna if you could,
Speaker 1: that'd be great. Thank you very much for that. All right,
Speaker 1: let's go in to this. Now, why would I think
Speaker 1: that maybe there's a possibility, not because Trump's coming in,
Speaker 1: but because of listening to Jamie Raskin. Now you know,
Speaker 1: Jamie Raskin obviously is a feckless member of Congress. You
Speaker 1: can usually spot him in hearings because he's he had
Speaker 1: a cancer diagnosis, so he where's like a do rag.
Speaker 1: It's very easy to spot. I'm not going to hack
Speaker 1: on the guy for that. I am going to hack
Speaker 1: on him for being a complete and utter lunatic and
Speaker 1: telling people this which I'm about to play for you
Speaker 1: at the same time that everyone's mad at Elon Musk
Speaker 1: because he was talking about, Hey, you know what, man, Yeah,
Speaker 1: civil war is going to be inevitable if you don't
Speaker 1: stop this. And look, Oh my gosh, can you believe
Speaker 1: you said that? Can you believe you said that? Here's
Speaker 1: what Jamie Raskin said. Are you ready? I hope you're
Speaker 1: sitting down. This will make you upset.
Speaker 3: What can be put into the Constitution can slip away
Speaker 3: from you very quickly. And the greatest example going on
Speaker 3: right now before our very eyes is Section three of
Speaker 3: the fourteenth Amendment, which they're just disappearing with the maud
Speaker 3: as if it doesn't exist, even though it could not
Speaker 3: be clearer what it's stating, and so you know, they
Speaker 3: want to kick it to Congress. So it's going to
Speaker 3: be up to us on January sixth, twenty twenty five,
Speaker 3: to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified, and
Speaker 3: then we need bodyguards for everybody in civil war conditions,
Speaker 3: all because the nine justices, not all of them, but
Speaker 3: these justices who have not many cases to look at
Speaker 3: every year, not that much work to do a huge staff,
Speaker 3: great protection, simply do not want to do their job
Speaker 3: and interpret what the great fourteenth Amendment means.
Speaker 1: All right, before I tell you what that is, ross,
Speaker 1: how do you think that would go? It's inauguration day.
Speaker 1: Trump's get ready to do the walk and Jamie Raskin
Speaker 1: and his fellow Democrats are standing by with personal bodyguards
Speaker 1: and they refuse to let him take the oath of office.
Speaker 1: How do you think that pans out? On that?
Speaker 2: Violence?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: You think violence? Maybe two factions who have already coalesced,
Speaker 1: because there's going to be a lot of Trump supporters
Speaker 1: there in Washington, d C. Obviously if it would be
Speaker 1: an their inauguration day for him, Yeah, I think that
Speaker 1: ends horribly and for all the people that are hacking
Speaker 1: on Elon Musk. And I mean this seriously. I think
Speaker 1: if you want to kick off a maybe not a
Speaker 1: civil war on par with what we've had, but an
Speaker 1: absolute pandemonium, it would be it would help to disintegrate
Speaker 1: in the same way, by the way, in the same way,
Speaker 1: by the way that when they were talking about Trump
Speaker 1: refusing to leave and then getting the military out there
Speaker 1: and doing all that stuff, that too would have kicked
Speaker 1: off pandemonium. But there were no indications he was going
Speaker 1: to do that other than to try to utilize many
Speaker 1: of the same tricks and tactics that Democrats have used
Speaker 1: over the years, which when they weren't working, he took
Speaker 1: his ball and went home. But if Jamie Raskin and
Speaker 1: Democrats do want to play it again for you to
Speaker 1: listen to their plan, if they were to do this
Speaker 1: in Washington, d C. I would be fearful with what
Speaker 1: would happen, because now you've got to figure out where
Speaker 1: alliances lie, who's technically in charge of the military to
Speaker 1: give orders to do things that violate pass Cooma tatis
Speaker 1: which I can never pronounce, but you know, basically the
Speaker 1: utilization of our military on US soil more so than
Speaker 1: just national guards, because they, you know, essentially might be
Speaker 1: controlled by individual governors, which turns into a whole messy thing.
Speaker 1: I couldn't think of something that would be more profoundly
Speaker 1: able to kick off an extensive period of violence, and
Speaker 1: it would put shame to the summer of peaceful, mostly
Speaker 1: peaceful protests, and the way he talks about the way
Speaker 1: everyone laughs, let me army with what the fourteenth Amendment,
Speaker 1: third section says. No person should be a senator or
Speaker 1: representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President,
Speaker 1: or hold any office civil or military under the US
Speaker 1: or any other state, who has previously taken an oath
Speaker 1: as member of Congress, or as an officer of the US,
Speaker 1: or as a member of any state legislature, or any
Speaker 1: executive or judicial office of any state, to support the
Speaker 1: Constitution of the US, but shall have engaged in insurrection
Speaker 1: or rebellion against the same. So this is the insurrection thing,
Speaker 1: which has been roundly rejected by various courts, including the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. And they're back at this, well you know that,
Speaker 1: well it was an insurrection there because look at that,
Speaker 1: like two of the people had quasi insurrection charges. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: They also had a bunch of charges that were just
Speaker 1: ruled illegal by the Supreme Court. So, you know, deciding
Speaker 1: that if you're Jamie, ask you that this is so
Speaker 1: cut and dry, you're literally willing to surround yourself with
Speaker 1: armed militia, even if the militia happens to be sworn
Speaker 1: members of our military, to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
Speaker 1: Who's protecting democracy here? So now that you know what
Speaker 1: it is, listen to this again and tell me how
Speaker 1: you think this works out.
Speaker 3: What can be put into the constitution can slip away
Speaker 3: from you very quickly. And the greatest example going on
Speaker 3: right now before our very eyes is section three of
Speaker 3: the fourteenth Amendment, which they're just disappearing with a magic
Speaker 3: wand as if it doesn't exist, even though it could
Speaker 3: not be clearer what it's.
Speaker 1: And I want to be clear, he's talking about doing
Speaker 1: an insurrection much more than Trump, who again tweeted out,
Speaker 1: you know, do things peacefully, regardless of what you think
Speaker 1: he did say, there's a timeline there. And Trump wasn't
Speaker 1: down there in the Capitol with anybody. He didn't try
Speaker 1: to seize power there, Jamie would Ammi Raskin is talking
Speaker 1: about literally is an insurrection.
Speaker 3: Stating and so you know they want to kick it
Speaker 3: to Congress. So it's going to be up to us
Speaker 3: on January sixth, twenty twenty five, to tell the rampaging
Speaker 3: Trump mobs that he's disqualified, and then we need bodyguards
Speaker 3: for everybody in civil war conditions, all because the nine justices,
Speaker 3: not all of them, but these justices who have not
Speaker 3: many cases to look at every year, not that much
Speaker 3: work to do, a huge staff, great protection, simply do
Speaker 3: not want to do their job and interpret what the
Speaker 3: great fourteenth Amendment means.
Speaker 1: I'm not being dramatic here. That's one of the most
Speaker 1: terrifying things I've ever heard a member of Congress say.
Speaker 1: I'm not being dramatic here. And maybe there's some other examples,
Speaker 1: but that's a roadmap for something that Raskin thinks is
Speaker 1: perfectly logical. Now do I think that he could get
Speaker 1: enough Democrat I don't, but I don't know. I would
Speaker 1: like to think that Jamie Raskin, who has a history
Speaker 1: of just saying random stuff, and they're trying to play
Speaker 1: it off like it was a thought exercise. No, you
Speaker 1: just painted a roadmap for what you think you can do.
Speaker 1: And when he talks about kicking it to Congress, what
Speaker 1: he's talking about is Supreme Court saying this is not
Speaker 1: what the Fourteenth Amendment says. You're insane. But if you
Speaker 1: want it to say that there is a process that
Speaker 1: you Congress and then the states can go through to
Speaker 1: change the Constitution to say basically whatever you want within reason.
Speaker 1: There are some ways, there are some things you can
Speaker 1: but you can't do it through just having you know,
Speaker 1: a majority vote plus one. You have to go through
Speaker 1: the amendment process, which, as you know, is such an
Speaker 1: arduous process. I don't know that we could ever do
Speaker 1: an amendment in this country. Again, which some people point
Speaker 1: as is saying the system is broken, But Jamie Raskin
Speaker 1: was talking clearly about no, no, no, no, no, we'll barricade
Speaker 1: ourselves in. What is he going to do, which is
Speaker 1: that's buy and mar right now, that's a Burma baby.
Speaker 1: That's wild, that's dangerous, and it is far scarier than
Speaker 1: anything that Elon Musk Is or Trump has ever said.
Speaker 1: The only reason it's not as scary as it could
Speaker 1: be is Jamie Raskin is but a lone member of Congress.
Speaker 1: And if that was a Republican, I would assure you
Speaker 1: that the media would be out asking every single other
Speaker 1: Republican if they agree with Jamie Raskin, and I bet
Speaker 1: they're not asking a single Democrat, which is weird. Our
Speaker 1: word of the month. Weird anyway, six forty nine hang
Speaker 1: on very same stories that we see every time a
Speaker 1: hurricane gets nearby continue to permeate. In fact, if you
Speaker 1: lost your one hundred million worth of cocaine, it has
Speaker 1: now washed up on the beaches of Florida, so you
Speaker 1: lost sight of you of your blow. They have found it.
Speaker 1: I have to assume, because we do this story every
Speaker 1: time there is a hurricane. Right, there's some beach in Florida,
Speaker 1: and generally you can kind of predict where roughly that
Speaker 1: gets just absolutely littered with piles of cocaine. In this case,
Speaker 1: it was the Florida Keys. As the storm you know,
Speaker 1: obviously was doing the Gulf Coast thing, so that was
Speaker 1: closest to where it was pushing it out. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: I guess you lost that. Go claim it at in
Speaker 1: the Florida Keys. I'm sure they'll hand it right over
Speaker 1: to you to show ID I have to assume there's
Speaker 1: crackheads just waiting near the beach. It's Florida. Man. Is
Speaker 1: that too cynical of me? Because I know that every
Speaker 1: time this happens, the cocaine washes up. And I was
Speaker 1: when I was in DC doing the broadcast. We interviewed
Speaker 1: Tom Holman. He had some dudes from like Border Patrol
Speaker 1: and whatnot who was still friends with. They were walking
Speaker 1: around and I remember it was off the air. We're
Speaker 1: having a conversation, and I understood that the dudes, uh,
Speaker 1: he was down in Miami. He was head of the
Speaker 1: Miami office where I can't remember his name, but whatever,
Speaker 1: And I had to ask, I'm like, how come, Like
Speaker 1: how much blow are you guys?
Speaker 3: Like?
Speaker 1: How much is hitting the beaches on the regular that
Speaker 1: one of he goes by? And why is that? Because
Speaker 1: I think a million dollars worth of cocaine If I'm
Speaker 1: the you know, the cartel, I'm not happy about that.
Speaker 1: So why does it keep happening? And he was explaining
Speaker 1: kind of intricate detail because they partner with Coastguard for
Speaker 1: like an interdiction unit. Like there's buoy's of cocaine just
Speaker 1: floating around it. There's so much of it. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not going to give you the number,
Speaker 1: but it's a lot. It's a lot lot, And I
Speaker 1: don't remember if it's one hundred percent accurate, but I
Speaker 1: think it is one hundred percent accurate. In the millions,
Speaker 1: did floating around, and they like they essentially mimic like
Speaker 1: diving markers, crab booies whatever, and then they sink the
Speaker 1: cocaine with weight and then they come along with the buoy,
Speaker 1: so they you know that one guy will get it
Speaker 1: halfway there and then they'll you know, they'll be out
Speaker 1: in uh in international waters wherever, right on the edge
Speaker 1: of it, and then somebody, I guess in the Miami
Speaker 1: Vice speedboat comes by and grabs it. But when the
Speaker 1: hurricanes coming and you got to floating around out there,
Speaker 1: it's you can break away from its tether and find
Speaker 1: its way to the beaches. Twenty five packages seventy pounds.
Speaker 1: That's what a million dollars will get you right now.
Speaker 1: And what's crazy is they logo this stuff too, so
Speaker 1: they immediately know whose cocaine it is. They just can't
Speaker 1: really do anything unless they want to, I don't know,
Speaker 1: fly to wherever this cartel is, uh drug the leader
Speaker 1: and then bring him to a breakfast join in El
Speaker 1: Paso kind of like got done with that dude, El Mayo.
Speaker 1: He just wakes up in the US, got some uh,
Speaker 1: let's some scrambled eggs in front of them. They are
Speaker 1: you it's the cartel leader. I guess we're taking you
Speaker 1: into custody. But that was just the little dream we
Speaker 1: formulated on the show. Here, I'd like to celebrate if
Speaker 1: I could, the worst people in the world, and that
Speaker 1: is the bots and activists. You need to understand that
Speaker 1: there are swath leaders or leaders of swaths of individuals
Speaker 1: who literally go on and stir crap on social media
Speaker 1: within the world of politics. And I think you understand that.
Speaker 1: And what you hope is you have a few people
Speaker 1: and then organically supporters start picking it up. And that's
Speaker 1: generally how it works, right. You just need to get
Speaker 1: a few in there to stir it and start the narrative, like, hey,
Speaker 1: here's the talking points, and then people who are you know,
Speaker 1: terminally online, we'll pick it up and run with it.
Speaker 1: And if you remember when we were talking about and
Speaker 1: I posted something that ended up getting quite a bit
Speaker 1: of engagement on the on the old Twitter, and it
Speaker 1: was about the predictive search algorithms right where you go
Speaker 1: any type attempted assassination of and then it wouldn't it
Speaker 1: wouldn't give you Trump. And the talking points were for
Speaker 1: a bunch of a bunch of trolls to run around
Speaker 1: and go, we'll just hit enter loser and then it's there.
Speaker 1: Although ironically that was thrown out the window when people
Speaker 1: were searching for Trump hitting enter and then it gave
Speaker 1: them common results last week. And also, you don't understand
Speaker 1: how algorithms work. And I had people that you know,
Speaker 1: where I tried to engage and it's just not worth
Speaker 1: it because you just point out, You're like, look, shouldn't
Speaker 1: predictive analysis, which is something that was created to make
Speaker 1: it quicker to search, shouldn't that provide you using Okham's
Speaker 1: razor ramone whatever, I don't need to get corrected this morning.
Speaker 1: Okham's raisor ramone. Using that, shouldn't it go?
Speaker 3: All? Right?
Speaker 1: Is it more likely that people are talking about the
Speaker 1: astemp the attempted assassination of Trump two weeks from the incident,
Speaker 1: or the attempted assassination of Andrew Jackson, who was the
Speaker 1: first president with an attempted assassination, And like, people with
Speaker 1: a straight face are like, no, no, you don't understand
Speaker 1: how algorithms work. And I'm I think I do. I
Speaker 1: think I do. That would be the most useful. Now,
Speaker 1: if you want to go with the conspiracy that is
Speaker 1: with it is it was. It is in the best
Speaker 1: interest of Google to make your search process slower because
Speaker 1: it can serve you more ads. I'll get on board that. Basically,
Speaker 1: they's got their handslap for being a monopoly kind of.
Speaker 1: One judge did the other one's like, no, nothing to
Speaker 1: see here. So everyone ran around all these little trolls
Speaker 1: on the Internet and they're just like and and and
Speaker 1: they were just proving completely wrong and if you if
Speaker 1: you presented them with it, they would just laugh. And
Speaker 1: that's the level of discourse that we haven't politics now,
Speaker 1: and it is the least useful discourse because there's no
Speaker 1: intellectual honesty there. Straight up, if you make an argument,
Speaker 1: you're not being an a hole about it. I'll listen
Speaker 1: to it. Convince me, convince me otherwise. And I have
Speaker 1: absolutely been convinced on stuff. I've been convinced on stuff,
Speaker 1: And even if it's not one hundred percent. The death
Speaker 1: penalty is a good example. A friend of mine who
Speaker 1: was convinced by a lawyer friend of his kind of
Speaker 1: explained it. And it does give me pause. Not all times.
Speaker 1: I still want to shoot the nine to eleven mastermind
Speaker 1: out of a cannon until he is what was the
Speaker 1: term ross super dead? Super dead?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: We want to go a super dead for Khalid Shaik Muhammad.
Speaker 1: I don't know what that is, but I'm here for it.
Speaker 1: But also when you get into the standard, you know,
Speaker 1: death penalty trials, I think it's a strong argument to
Speaker 1: point out that it's the totality of everything that the
Speaker 1: government can throw at you versus you and either you're
Speaker 1: appointed attorney or whatever you able to muster as a
Speaker 1: private citizen doesn't mean he did it or didn't do it. It
Speaker 1: just means that that's very David and Goliath. And we've
Speaker 1: especially when you see the corruption that people are willing
Speaker 1: to do in the furtherance of justice, whether it's all
Speaker 1: the Trump trials, the Jay sixth stuff, which again I'm
Speaker 1: not opposed to you prosecuting people who are assaulting police
Speaker 1: officers and sticking it to him because I think you've
Speaker 1: crossed the line with physical violence. But when you're when
Speaker 1: you're throwing a grandmother for praying in front of an
Speaker 1: abortion clinic in jail for a half decade or whatever
Speaker 1: whatever it was she was facing a decade, I have
Speaker 1: to ask myself, is this political so like, now I
Speaker 1: have a much more nuanced thought on it. That's how
Speaker 1: this is supposed to work. But that, of course is
Speaker 1: not how it works. Now, how do I know? They're
Speaker 1: completely full of crap? Even though I knew the moment
Speaker 1: that they were posting all this stuff. Hell, would you
Speaker 1: look at that? Google told House Republicans that various bugs
Speaker 1: prevented information about Donald Trump from auto completing when users
Speaker 1: tried to search for information about the assassination attempt. So
Speaker 1: Google's own people, Google has said that exactly what people
Speaker 1: said was happening was happening, and that it was wrong.
Speaker 1: Now is it a random bug? Didn't Mark Zuckerberg just
Speaker 1: fess up to the seventh? It was the photo, that's right.
Speaker 1: There was a glitch that kept the photo of Trump,
Speaker 1: you know, that iconic photo with his fist in the air,
Speaker 1: of being able to be shared on Facebook. Just dio whoopsie,
Speaker 1: And I'll say it so you don't have to. It's
Speaker 1: so weird how all these errors go in this one direction.
Speaker 1: And I think you get a little semblance of it
Speaker 1: when you realized. You remember when Elon was first in
Speaker 1: Twitter and he was looking over the code and they're like,
Speaker 1: you have no idea what's in here. There could be
Speaker 1: stuff buried in here so deep that until it manifests
Speaker 1: and we're able to target it, you just can't even
Speaker 1: you can't even purge it. And and you know, they've
Speaker 1: made a lot of progress over over the time that
Speaker 1: he's owned it, but you know, you get one mift
Speaker 1: TDS suffering code er, you know, eight years ago, screwing
Speaker 1: with the algorithm, and and that's kind of stuff that'll
Speaker 1: be in there. And they'll never admit that because it
Speaker 1: would show that they don't have control over their own product.
Speaker 1: But they will say it was a whoopsie. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I always had a glitch, man, I just had a glitch.
Speaker 1: And again, the glitches all seem to go in this,
Speaker 1: uh one direction, which tells me you got you got
Speaker 1: rogue employees. You've always had rogue employs, and now people
Speaker 1: are just calling you out on your garbage. So yes
Speaker 1: to all of you trolls on the internet, even though
Speaker 1: you don't care. Uh they're the everyone was right and
Speaker 1: Google admits it. Uh Now the specifically, here's what they
Speaker 1: say the glitches. The company said that they have built
Speaker 1: in protections around political violence. So because somebody shot Trump.
Speaker 1: That's political violence, and we can't have it out there.
Speaker 1: Here's the thing that is such a foreseeable thing. If
Speaker 1: you're sitting in a meeting at Google, and you know,
Speaker 1: you get the brain trust there, and I'm not even
Speaker 1: a coder, right, but I can project and prognosticate things.
Speaker 1: I do it every day, you know, with Raskin's cut
Speaker 1: and other stuff. It's part that analysis is part of
Speaker 1: what we do. I would have sat there and raised
Speaker 1: my hands, all right. So anybody who does something to
Speaker 1: a politician violence, commits violence against a politician. We're not
Speaker 1: going to allow that stuff to populate searches. What if
Speaker 1: somebody assassinates president? That's the logical question. And then they
Speaker 1: would tell you, well, no, that's not what we mean. Well,
Speaker 1: apparently it is. And also, I don't believe you because
Speaker 1: the Nancy Pelosi hammer story was everywhere. It was easily searchable,
Speaker 1: easily searchable. J six stories about people and members of
Speaker 1: Congress fearing for their lives were everywhere. You're telling me
Speaker 1: that this glitch didn't catch any of those, but you know,
Speaker 1: globbed on to the Trump story. I don't believe you.
Speaker 1: I think that I'm I think that you have employees
Speaker 1: that screw with your stuff because they think they can,
Speaker 1: and why wouldn't they think they can? And hell yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe even you know, not rogue employees as much as
Speaker 1: people in management positions, going wink wink, not done. Now
Speaker 1: that's I can't prove that, but you asked you tell
Speaker 1: me what's more likely bunch of supposedly really smart people
Speaker 1: who were unable to think that one day somebody might
Speaker 1: actually assassinate another president, which has happened multiple times in
Speaker 1: this country. Right We've had four presidents killed or they
Speaker 1: just forgot to say it, or that somebody is doing
Speaker 1: things that they probably think they can do right because
Speaker 1: they have to. In the same way that those trolls
Speaker 1: rolled in with absolutely disingenuous talking points going, you don't
Speaker 1: understand how algorithms work, and you don't have to understand
Speaker 1: a bit of coding to think that a more useful
Speaker 1: product is one that does what you wanted to do
Speaker 1: versus one that does all the other things. How frustrated
Speaker 1: have you been trying to search something on Google's probably
Speaker 1: once a week where I'm just insane, Like, we think
Speaker 1: of a story and it's usually a story that's not
Speaker 1: going to be positive for whatever the current you know,
Speaker 1: liberal talking points are, and I'm like, didn't we have
Speaker 1: this thing that happened? And then I'll you know, I'll
Speaker 1: throw it out there. I'll throw it out there, and
Speaker 1: you know, the ross will be like Ross, didn't we
Speaker 1: talk about this thing? And other than ross and I
Speaker 1: not being able to remember exactly when it happened because
Speaker 1: I'll think something was three months ago and it's three
Speaker 1: years ago. It's crazy. I'll start searching for because I
Speaker 1: want to get the details, and it could be incredibly
Speaker 1: hard to find things that were I remember there being
Speaker 1: big stories and it's like, how does that stuff get
Speaker 1: memory hold within a supposedly unlimited storage, right that is
Speaker 1: the Internet? It is it is essentially unlimited nothing. That's
Speaker 1: why they say, you know, once it's on the Internet,
Speaker 1: there's nothing you can do. You did your only fans
Speaker 1: for six months, and now every time you get a job,
Speaker 1: people google your name and it's you know that, it's
Speaker 1: almost it's almost impossible to wipe. And yet you know,
Speaker 1: big stories will just find themselves unsearchable. So look, there's
Speaker 1: there's bigger issues. But yeah, I did understand algorithms. I
Speaker 1: think they're lying about what exactly happened. But I would
Speaker 1: point out it all goes in the same direction each
Speaker 1: and every time, all right, eight eight eight nine three
Speaker 1: four seven eight seven four, And that is that extends
Speaker 1: to AI. So you want more, you want more, absolutely
Speaker 1: political prosecutions and or people going after various entities Elon
Speaker 1: musk Ai Grock is now the target of state's attorney
Speaker 1: generals or however you say that a bunch of Democrats.
Speaker 1: Now I noticed Josh Stein need to sign onto this.
Speaker 1: Not yet, I'm actually surprised. But ultimately they're saying that
Speaker 1: Groc's out there giving misinformation for the election. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: have you tried the other AI that Don't get me wrong,
Speaker 1: I've seen examples of GROC that is clearly not clearly
Speaker 1: not giving accurate information. It should be abundantly clear to
Speaker 1: anybody that AI is not a reliable source at the moment.
Speaker 1: It might be a starting point, but it's not a
Speaker 1: reliable single source for things. You have to go figure
Speaker 1: out what instructed that AI. So if an AI is
Speaker 1: instructed by what it sees permeating, like if Google's AI
Speaker 1: is instructed by what permeates with predictive search results, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that it is, but if that's the sourcing
Speaker 1: it's using, then it's going to be wrong. The head
Speaker 1: of the Democrat Party up in Wisconsin was giving false
Speaker 1: information about Wisconsin's voting laws and GROC. One of the
Speaker 1: things that screwed up was the replacing somebody on a
Speaker 1: ballot and the dates that were necessary. And it was
Speaker 1: clear that it had sourced statements by the head of
Speaker 1: the Wisconsin Democratic Party who had given erroneous information and
Speaker 1: social media posts. Well, that makes sense. If you're AI,
Speaker 1: You're like, who should I ask? And I should ask
Speaker 1: somebody who's in political power in this particular state. They
Speaker 1: probably know you. Glad you grab that information and represent it.
Speaker 1: But you'll notice that these attorney generals for these states
Speaker 1: are not asking for a review or apology or a
Speaker 1: process of the other ais, which, if you remember, we're
Speaker 1: making female black Asian Nazis right and then giving erroneous
Speaker 1: information about stuff, all sorts of stuff like Donald Trump
Speaker 1: wasn't nobody tried to kill him, nothing happened. Re collapsed
Speaker 1: on stage, had a medical issue that still to this
Speaker 1: day is something that you'll get that is erroneous information.
Speaker 1: And according to the state's attorney generals. The only way
Speaker 1: to go ahead and solve the problem. Are you ready
Speaker 1: for this is to fix AI so that it will
Speaker 1: only when it comes to information about elections. All the
Speaker 1: AI will do, rather than trying to provide it is
Speaker 1: direct you to a website that's controlled by Democrats. It's
Speaker 1: absolutely wild. They say it's a nonpartisan. It's clearly not
Speaker 1: Go look at it. Go look at it, because if
Speaker 1: they can't control the information, that's a problem. If they
Speaker 1: can shame the AI people into saying, well, no, if
Speaker 1: you want any information about that, you have to go
Speaker 1: to this website, then they control the single source of
Speaker 1: information right there, and that's what they're trying to do.
Speaker 1: All of these defenders of democracy, along with Jamie Raskin,
Speaker 1: which yes, is searchable and does seem to me to
Speaker 1: be I don't know. In support of political violence is
Speaker 1: immediately searchable, but I don't know if Google fixed it,
Speaker 1: so I don't I don't know. And if you don't
Speaker 1: know what Jamie Raskin said, hell, I'm gonna play it
Speaker 1: one more time for you.
Speaker 3: What can be put into the constitution.
Speaker 1: This is a congressman has to do with the do
Speaker 1: rag because he had the cancer, so he's easy. I
Speaker 1: just want this is a visual thing. I'm not hacking
Speaker 1: on the dude for cancer, but I just you know
Speaker 1: who this lunatic is.
Speaker 3: What can be put into the Constitution can slip away
Speaker 3: from you very quickly. And the greatest example going on
Speaker 3: right now before our very eyes is section three of
Speaker 3: the fourteenth Amendment, which is insurrection disappearing with a magic
Speaker 3: wand as if it doesn't exist, even though it could
Speaker 3: not be clearer what it's stating. And so you know,
Speaker 3: they want to kick it to Congress. So it's going
Speaker 3: to be up to us on January sixth, twenty twenty
Speaker 3: five to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified
Speaker 3: and then we need bodyguards for everybody in civil war conditions,
Speaker 3: all because the nine justices, not all of them, but
Speaker 3: these justices who have not made right.
Speaker 1: That's the important part. So he just said, look, if
Speaker 1: we can't get the Supreme Court to do what we want,
Speaker 1: I think even though they and other justice and judges
Speaker 1: all around him. So that's not what insurrection means. And
Speaker 1: by the way, he didn't do that. He's like, well,
Speaker 1: we're on inauguration day, with all Trump supporters in town,
Speaker 1: somebody's gonna have to stand in front go Nope, we're
Speaker 1: not swearing your dude in. I don't know what statement
Speaker 1: can lead to more political violence than that, and maybe
Speaker 1: that's what they want, so they can just put down
Speaker 1: all of the MAGA stuff violently. Anyway, we'll be back. Shockingly,
Speaker 1: it's coming from WRIL. Now this is this is an
Speaker 1: opinion piece and it's not from WRL. Instead, it's from
Speaker 1: a UNC Chapel Hills School of Information and Library Science
Speaker 1: professor and author Tresi McMillan cotton um done. And then
Speaker 1: it's an em at the end. Okay, excuse me. It's
Speaker 1: a doozy and I feel like some of you are
Speaker 1: not going to agree, but that's why we'll have this discussion.
Speaker 1: And also it's a hell of an argument she's making
Speaker 1: entitled why I love the DMV and you should too. Really, okay,
Speaker 1: what is it? Is it? The do you know someone
Speaker 1: who works there and you're like, that's a good person,
Speaker 1: and look, the DMV is just it's another unit of government.
Speaker 1: Arguably it's one of the most front facing units, right
Speaker 1: It's it's one of the few where you go and
Speaker 1: interact on You know, a lot of people will never
Speaker 1: interact with, you know, in the first person, with their government.
Speaker 1: They'll never go to a council meeting. And you know,
Speaker 1: I want to opine on something, but when it comes
Speaker 1: to you know, when it comes to I guess car stuff,
Speaker 1: whether it's a DMV, the plate outlets or yeah, that
Speaker 1: kind of stuff. It's inevitable. Even you know, your your
Speaker 1: property taxes, with your how short of a city inspector
Speaker 1: coming out because you did some work, you know, that stuff,
Speaker 1: it's all at arm's length. But the DMV, man, that's
Speaker 1: something you're up in. So I'm gonna read this, but
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna tell you what is is obvious
Speaker 1: to me is the argument here, and that's what makes
Speaker 1: this so insane. All right, So here we go. This
Speaker 1: is from the from the article. It says you may
Speaker 1: disagree with me on a visceral level, you would not
Speaker 1: be alone. It is chic to roll your eyes at
Speaker 1: the DMV to express exaggerated condolences when people say they
Speaker 1: have to renew their driver's license. Didn't I just did
Speaker 1: this with Ross because you were like, what were we
Speaker 1: talking about? If you have a DMV thing. You had
Speaker 1: to do something like that, right, And I think when
Speaker 1: you told me, I was immediately like, I'm sorry, bro, sorry,
Speaker 1: you have to deal with that. That's our normal reaction
Speaker 1: to stuff. Why because it sucks. It's the experience sucks.
Speaker 1: The having to get there and show up at the
Speaker 1: DMV like you're waiting to buy Taylor Swift tickets and
Speaker 1: you know, bring your bring your little lounge chair. Have
Speaker 1: you have you been to a d m V office
Speaker 1: or have you driven by one prior to it opening?
Speaker 1: People are lined up, especially in the uh you know,
Speaker 1: in the in the in the bigger cities, they're lined
Speaker 1: up there because that's their day and they have to
Speaker 1: do something that should take them five friggin seconds. Now,
Speaker 1: some of it you can do online, but eventually you
Speaker 1: get to hit a number where you got to go in.
Speaker 1: I think this is I think I'm the I can renew.
Speaker 1: I have one more renewal and then I have to
Speaker 1: do it in person, and I hate every moment of that.
Speaker 1: And I already have a real idea. I have a passport,
Speaker 1: so like I could give two craps about you get
Speaker 1: the get the real idea with North Carolina don't care.
Speaker 1: I have a passport, I'll just use that and then
Speaker 1: next time it rolls around, I guess I'll get it.
Speaker 1: But I'm not. I'm not. I'm not champion at the
Speaker 1: bit to get in there man. Anyway, I digress. Even
Speaker 1: with more, even more than other government services, the d
Speaker 1: m V is character arise as a bureaucratic black hole
Speaker 1: with long lines, surly clerks, inefficiencies. Yes, because again it's
Speaker 1: one of the few ones where most people are going
Speaker 1: to have to interact on a first person basis with
Speaker 1: the government, so it can be very frustrated. And the
Speaker 1: North Carolina DMV is a healthscape all its own. Remember
Speaker 1: under this administration, under the Cooper administration, the previous director
Speaker 1: of the DMV damn near or with the dot excuse me,
Speaker 1: bankrupted for all practical purposes. The branch of government look
Speaker 1: it up, never really and there was never really an
Speaker 1: account there other than yeah, we swapped out some management,
Speaker 1: we did some other things. They squandered all of your
Speaker 1: DOT dollars, that half the projects that had to grind
Speaker 1: into a halt. The whole thing was an absolute crap
Speaker 1: show man. So it makes sense that the DMV was
Speaker 1: never able to expand to accommodate the fact that we
Speaker 1: have how many people still moving to the state of
Speaker 1: North Carolina every day? Red dumpster fire. I shared this
Speaker 1: story yesterday online, and I had people in towns like
Speaker 1: Lillington right, not hacking on Lillington for being Lillington, but
Speaker 1: there's not that many people there are compared to you know,
Speaker 1: Wake County. One of our listeners showed up right with
Speaker 1: his with his tailgate chair, and his whole day ruined.
Speaker 1: Only to have ten minutes after the supposed opening time,
Speaker 1: when everyone's outfront's going what the hell's going on? To
Speaker 1: have a sign hung up that said, sorry, we'll be
Speaker 1: closed today. This was ape. This was let me check
Speaker 1: the date. This is recent, by the ways. He posted
Speaker 1: a picture of the signs, so unless it's photoshopped, which
Speaker 1: I don't believe it is, this is fairly recent. And
Speaker 1: others opining that this happened to them too. Sorry, I
Speaker 1: don't know why, I just closed the damn thing. Here
Speaker 1: we go, dude to staff shortages at the DMV office
Speaker 1: in Lillington, will be closed today. This was yesterday, and
Speaker 1: they took a picture here obviously the sign which they
Speaker 1: had to put up ten minutes after it was supposed
Speaker 1: to open. What the hell's going on? What the hell's
Speaker 1: going on? And then others have said that office in
Speaker 1: Cernersville did the same thing. So tryad triangle or points between.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter. This picture looks like the one from
Speaker 1: Cernersville where I spent three hours waiting for my son
Speaker 1: only to find out that they ran out of time.
Speaker 1: How many of you have gone in We had another listener.
Speaker 1: She said that she went in there and sat it
Speaker 1: out and then realized that we were getting to the
Speaker 1: end of the day and she's like twenty second from
Speaker 1: still getting in there. So what the hell is this
Speaker 1: college professor talking about? What could she possibly think is
Speaker 1: so awesome about the DMV that she wrote this communism? Sorry? That'sok.
Speaker 1: An abrupt turn, isn't it? Communism? I hate? I'm going
Speaker 1: to go back to reading this.
Speaker 2: I hate.
Speaker 1: Although she did say that they had heard DMV in
Speaker 1: Chapel Hill, I guess that they have the Zootopia picture
Speaker 1: of the sloth as a DMV worker, which strangely I
Speaker 1: think we talked about on the air here just very recently.
Speaker 1: But all right, so she says, we are living in
Speaker 1: one of the most unequal periods of modern history. The
Speaker 1: gulf between the wealthy and everyone else is so wide
Speaker 1: that you'd need a private jet to cross it. Wealthy
Speaker 1: interests have an outsized influence on our politics. Whenever you
Speaker 1: see a radically unfit candidate running for office, you can
Speaker 1: usually find a wealthy donor what a rich argument to
Speaker 1: be making right now with Captain Chuckles there in the middle.
Speaker 1: Instead of fighting for equity, there's that word that's not equality.
Speaker 1: People who are not quite wealthy but not really poor
Speaker 1: compete with one another on razor thin margins, and then
Speaker 1: of course it's all about not being associated with, you know,
Speaker 1: the pores. The stratification is everywhere. Fast passes on toll roads,
Speaker 1: exclusive access at amusement parks, upgrades on Uber and Uber eats.
Speaker 1: The DMV is so hated because it doesn't make status distinctions.
Speaker 1: You can't pay to separate yourself from the masses. Everyone
Speaker 1: has to search the same cumbersome website. You have to
Speaker 1: compete for an appointment or show up early, whether you
Speaker 1: have a high net worth or a negative bank balance.
Speaker 1: This is communism what she's talking about here, and I'm
Speaker 1: not being overly dramatic. This is. This is in the
Speaker 1: minds of many leftists, this is communism perfected. Sure it sucks,
Speaker 1: but it sucks for all of this, which of course
Speaker 1: isn't the case. I promise you there are people who
Speaker 1: are able to fast track certain things within the DMV,
Speaker 1: and you couldn't tell me otherwise. Do I think the
Speaker 1: governor who has it when they have to renew their
Speaker 1: life since goes insists of the DMV. I don't believe
Speaker 1: that for a moment unless they do it for a
Speaker 1: photo op and they roll them in and roll them
Speaker 1: out because they're sure as hellm not sitting there for
Speaker 1: four hours waiting. It's wild man that anyone would write this.
Speaker 1: And then the reasoning being that, well that's because it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter how much money you have, it sucks for everybody. Well, crap,
Speaker 1: isn't that a problem? You're making this argument because you
Speaker 1: think it proves some point about it. If we had
Speaker 1: total equity, you know, America could be a better place.
Speaker 1: But the example you're using is the thing people hate
Speaker 1: the most about government interactions. Is the worst piece of
Speaker 1: supportive evidence I've ever heard in an argument.
Speaker 2: You could privatize it and make it a lot better
Speaker 2: experience for sure. Yes, I don't care what you are.
Speaker 2: You take the general manager of Walmart there in Wig
Speaker 2: four or Target or whatever, and you have them like
Speaker 2: you know, you now have to be in charge of
Speaker 2: the DMV and figure this out. Guarantee you they can
Speaker 2: do better job than what we have right now.
Speaker 1: The process is broken and for this woman goes, but
Speaker 1: it's broken for everybody equally. What a stupid argument. You're
Speaker 1: a professor? How am I so much smarter than all
Speaker 1: the not all of them, but some of the professors
Speaker 1: over there, Because I would have told you this is
Speaker 1: the worst example to make your point, because all you're
Speaker 1: saying is because this is what is promised with when
Speaker 1: people start talking about getting communism right, this is what's
Speaker 1: promised right. No distinction of social classes from each according
Speaker 1: to their ability to each according to their needs. That
Speaker 1: kind of garbage, and which by the way, is a
Speaker 1: quote of you know, arguably the biggest proponents of communism
Speaker 1: that also killed you know, tens of millions of their countrymen.
Speaker 1: This isn't good. What you need to do is you
Speaker 1: need to take something that people like and then show that,
Speaker 1: regardless of your socioeconomic status, you can achieve this, But
Speaker 1: you went with the DMV to go, Hey, communism achieved
Speaker 1: and that's a good thing. Absolute lunacy a speaking.
Speaker 2: Not only is it understaffed that it does all work,
Speaker 2: it also does a horrible job of what it's supposed
Speaker 2: to do, which is produced drivers that can drive on
Speaker 2: the roads. Have you driven on the roads here? Well,
Speaker 2: there's a lot of people coming. Remember the last time
Speaker 2: I went there, I was sitting at the DMV and
Speaker 2: I was I was listening to people do their test
Speaker 2: and that person there and the little office and like Louisburg,
Speaker 2: whatever was was sitting there going uh, you know, yeah,
Speaker 2: give them the giving them the answer.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the other thing. Go to Lewisbourg.
Speaker 2: You go to Lewisbourg and there were two people there.
Speaker 2: They're completely understaffed and overworked.
Speaker 1: What was it? I think it was? Yeah, I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: Because they were completely overstaffed and underwork. They were just
Speaker 2: people in and out. You do a horrible job in
Speaker 2: the test, we're gonna stamp, you're gonna improve it. You
Speaker 2: can leave and I don't care if you drive like
Speaker 2: a jackass on the roads. Get out of my office.
Speaker 1: Yeah, don't hit me. Who was it? Ap Dylan was
Speaker 1: telling me, I take is ap Dylan our writer friend
Speaker 1: from North State journal. I think she was trying to
Speaker 1: get her daughter her first driver's license. She was trying
Speaker 1: to make appointments and like Murphy and stuff. I know
Speaker 1: if it was quite Murphy, but what what's going on?
Speaker 1: So this absolutely to see eight eight eight nine three
Speaker 1: four seven eight seven four. So do you feel better
Speaker 1: about the DMV now because it sucks for everybody? Let
Speaker 1: us know, raced agic. Do you like the DMV? You
Speaker 1: fan of the DOV is the dumbest op ed ever,
Speaker 1: But it sucks for everybody equally. So that's a good thing. No,
Speaker 1: it's not. No, definitely not a good thing. Yay, I
Speaker 1: found that. I see that somebody found my million dollars
Speaker 1: worth of cocaine and the Florida keys.
Speaker 5: Oh okay, every.
Speaker 1: Hurd w every hurricane. I don't understand why the beaches
Speaker 1: are not lined by crackheads when they hear hurricanes coming.
Speaker 1: Man possible, Yeah.
Speaker 5: For us, it's not a hurricane. But yeah, you go
Speaker 5: back to last week at this time, I think we'd
Speaker 5: be impacted as much. We're going to be flood watches
Speaker 5: up now, we'll start to see the rain showers come
Speaker 5: in today. The triangle points east and south may end
Speaker 5: up with some decent showers thunder showers today, but it's
Speaker 5: really through tomorrow, Tomorrow night, Thursday, potentially even into Friday.
Speaker 5: Rain will pick up an intensity and coverage and we
Speaker 5: could end up with double digit rain totals. That does
Speaker 5: include Raleigh, Durham, and areas to the south end to
Speaker 5: the east, especially east of eighty five. But as you
Speaker 5: go our east of ninety five, excuse me, but as
Speaker 5: you go further west, there'll be lower amounts, but still
Speaker 5: some flooding possible, even around Greensboro Winston Salem where there
Speaker 5: could be a few inches of rainfall there also. So
Speaker 5: things are gonna unwind pretty quickly here and it's a
Speaker 5: multi day rain event. We're not gonna get rid of
Speaker 5: Debbie until maybe late in the week, So once the
Speaker 5: rain starts coming in, it's gonna be on and off
Speaker 5: for multiple days. So hunger down now as a forecast,
Speaker 5: as we kind of sharpen the pencil a little bit,
Speaker 5: is going to be maybe eight to ten inches of Raleigh, Durham,
Speaker 5: points south and east of that even more. And then
Speaker 5: as you get back into the triad four or five
Speaker 5: six inches of rain. Now that's cumulatively it'll take multiple days.
Speaker 5: That's through Friday, but pretty good like there will be
Speaker 5: flooding and there will be issues with water getting into
Speaker 5: places where it's not supposed to be. So you know,
Speaker 5: it is gonna go downhill and go downhill pretty quickly.
Speaker 5: The winds will start gusting tomorrow twenty to twenty five,
Speaker 5: maybe twenty five to thirty on Thursday and Friday. I
Speaker 5: don't know if we get the tropical storm force, but
Speaker 5: still gusty winds and rainy and just just an awful
Speaker 5: period of time coming up. There's no other way to
Speaker 5: sugarcoat it. For some, especially east and south, there could
Speaker 5: be some historic rain. In parts of South Carolina, they
Speaker 5: could get thirty inches of rain. Some spots have already
Speaker 5: seen over a foot.
Speaker 1: Well, at least the majority of the state isn't low
Speaker 1: lying and swampish. So yah, good, good that, yeah, it
Speaker 1: could be that all right. Well, yeah, we hope everyone's okay,
Speaker 1: and yeah, but you know, if something happens the DMV,
Speaker 1: I mean you're good, yeah, yeah, yeah, I don't want
Speaker 1: the people there, so but you get it all right,
Speaker 1: thank you, Sir, appreciated by the way. Now people are
Speaker 1: emailing me Ross. Apparently there's a d m V Kiosk
Speaker 1: and Raleigh to serve state workers. So that's not equity,
Speaker 1: is it? Is it only state workers are allowed to
Speaker 1: go to I need more info on this because this
Speaker 1: completely blows all this garbage out of the water, all
Speaker 1: of it out of the water. Is it near the
Speaker 1: bus stop? So at least they have to risk getting stabbed,
Speaker 1: That's what That's why we didn't get to that yesterday.
Speaker 1: But that's that's one of the aspects we're going to
Speaker 1: talk about. Anyway. We'll try to get to all of
Speaker 1: it coming up KCO Day Radio program, just because I
Speaker 1: know it's gossipy, but also you know, there's the potential
Speaker 1: for some really really big names if they if they're
Speaker 1: ever actually willing to dig into all the diddy stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, I can't imagine some of the stuff that
Speaker 1: would come out about people are big, big right now.
Speaker 1: But much like the Epstein client list, I would say
Speaker 1: good luck with that and take it for what it's worth.
Speaker 1: There's a report out this morning, and this was prompted
Speaker 1: by a social media post by sug Knight, but Apparently
Speaker 1: there are others who back with Knight saying or excuse
Speaker 1: me a social media post of a podcast, So Suge
Speaker 1: Knight's on a podcast, and then the video posted. All right,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to play it for you because I
Speaker 1: didn't Ross is busy, doesn't need to dub that in.
Speaker 1: But they were talking about Ben Affleck and j Loo,
Speaker 1: you know, the divorce, the pending divorce, and according to Knight,
Speaker 1: by the way, Suge Knight's in prison, you need to
Speaker 1: understand that he hosts this podcast, participates on the prison phone,
Speaker 1: which is probably pretty expensive. So Knight is suggesting that
Speaker 1: Ben Affleck wants to divorce from j Lo because of
Speaker 1: some very explicit videos that were part of what was
Speaker 1: obtained during the raid of Combs's Diddy. I guess p Diddy,
Speaker 1: Sean Combs, any of the other names he went by,
Speaker 1: in in which Lopez maybe doing some really really bad stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't what that is. I don't know, you know,
Speaker 1: some of the Diddy stuff is has to do with
Speaker 1: underage people. I don't know if that's the allegation or
Speaker 1: it's just really really like salacious video that was taken over.
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer to that, but they go
Speaker 1: to Puffy here's the quote. They go to Puffy's house
Speaker 1: to get all these videos of Jaylo doing this, Jlo
Speaker 1: doing that, and the FEDS apparently talked to Affleck and
Speaker 1: showed him screenshots of some of the footage. I don't
Speaker 1: know if that's the process, but that's I mean, that's crazy, man.
Speaker 1: But he wants to go ahead and get that divorce
Speaker 1: done because when it hits the fans, so to speak,
Speaker 1: he doesn't want to be there. It's that story, never one.
Speaker 1: Here's the one that bothered me incessantly. It looks like
Speaker 1: they're gonna get ready to ruin another eighties movie action
Speaker 1: flick nineteen eighty seven with a updated version for modern audiences,
Speaker 1: and that would be Running Man. Ross. You a fan
Speaker 1: of The Running Man? You like The Running Man? Yeah?
Speaker 2: No, it's a good movie.
Speaker 1: It's good movie. It's pure eighties. It's for the timeframe
Speaker 1: it is. It is what it is, and obviously Arnold
Speaker 1: Schwarzenegger if you don't remember it, and there's a game
Speaker 1: show or they stick him into like the abandoned part
Speaker 1: of the city and they basically have to fight like
Speaker 1: Mortal Kombat characters.
Speaker 2: I'm sort of like at the age now, because if
Speaker 2: it's in the eighties, I'm like, yeah, I'll take it
Speaker 2: over anything we have today. Goofy, silly, don't care, I'll
Speaker 2: take it. You mean a remake or there the original?
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, yes, yeah, I watched Running Man not
Speaker 1: that long ago. I think it was on HBO Max
Speaker 1: or something. I watched it not that long ago. And
Speaker 1: it's the perfect movie for when on Sundays when I'm
Speaker 1: putting prep together. That's the exact kind of movie I
Speaker 1: tend to put on in the background because I already
Speaker 1: know what's happening. Right, But according to new reports out
Speaker 1: they are they want to do an update starring Sidney Sweeney.
Speaker 1: Do we all know who Sidney Sweeney is? Sidney Sweeney
Speaker 1: is a very blessed woman, as evidenced by her plunging
Speaker 1: necklines in her uh uh.
Speaker 2: She got like huge brains.
Speaker 1: They're giant brains. Tran you know, good for her, doesn't
Speaker 1: hide them, you know sometimes women will, you know.
Speaker 2: Know they're saying that she brought her she brought them back.
Speaker 2: They're saying like she killed bulk in that respect. Remember
Speaker 2: she was an SNL at the end of it, and
Speaker 2: They're like.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, and uh. And by the way, she's already
Speaker 1: do you know she's redoing Barbarella, that Jane Fonda movie
Speaker 1: from the sixties, which you know what, I'm okay with that.
Speaker 1: That's fine. Anything to purge Jane Fonda is. So as
Speaker 1: long as Sidney Sweeney avoids throwing in with the Vietcong,
Speaker 1: we're probably okay. That being said, what what is is
Speaker 1: that a high bar? Is that should I You're gonna.
Speaker 2: Break the simulation. Man, She's gonna come out against Ho
Speaker 2: Chi Minh and it's gonna be over zero fox.
Speaker 1: All right, Hey, at least then will know at least
Speaker 1: at least we'll know at least we'll do all right.
Speaker 1: So anyway, so yes, Sidney Sweeney and actor Glenn Powell.
Speaker 1: If you don't know Glenn Powell is I'm trying to
Speaker 1: He was in hip Man, but he was in uh,
Speaker 1: he was in the Top Gun Maverick. But did you
Speaker 1: ever see that Ross Riversy Top Gun Maverick?
Speaker 2: I saw it up until the middle of it, and
Speaker 2: then I just stopped washing and then I saw like
Speaker 2: the the clip of of of Maverick showing the kids
Speaker 2: how it can be done.
Speaker 1: Yes, Okay, you remember the one? Yeah? Do you remember
Speaker 1: the iceman character of the young pilots, the really cocky one?
Speaker 1: And yes, that's Glenn Powell. Okay, all right, except except
Speaker 1: he's no Schwartzenegger. But I don't mind him and stuff.
Speaker 1: I've seen him, and that being said, he's not Schwartzenegger. However,
Speaker 1: there is some speculation that there could be some role reversal,
Speaker 1: so Sweeney would not be the executive from the TV
Speaker 1: station right who ends up getting tossed in their spoiler
Speaker 1: with Arnold. She might be the Arnold.
Speaker 2: Now I fine with that, because Arnold in the original movie,
Speaker 2: did he do a lot of running?
Speaker 1: No, it was the murdering. There was some running. I
Speaker 1: see what you're I see what's Yes, yes.
Speaker 2: So she'll be running in the movie.
Speaker 1: No, she'll be She'll be just murdering everybody within seconds
Speaker 1: at all. You know, yes, probably initially slow motion running.
Speaker 1: I mean you can slow down video on today's modern TV.
Speaker 2: You know, I'll have to see a trailer.
Speaker 1: Let me. Could you do me a favorite? Could you
Speaker 1: call down to Paradise and uh? And you know what,
Speaker 1: I need an independent take on this? Can you call
Speaker 1: down to Paradise and Uh, check in with Whitman, Price,
Speaker 1: Hadad and see what they think of this. Could you call?
Speaker 1: And they're on the beach right now, still in their outfits.
Speaker 1: It's really weird. Yeah. I don't care Whitman, Price or Hadad.
Speaker 1: You can check with any one of them. I'm just
Speaker 1: curious what they think as folks who were in the
Speaker 1: original original one, you know, are the previous winners from
Speaker 1: the show. So all right, we'll check in with them
Speaker 1: because they're in paradise. Uh oh oh, Ross making it
Speaker 1: look are they not? Oh they've been murdered. Okay, all right.
Speaker 1: Why do I randomly remember the names of the previous
Speaker 1: winners on The Running Man and yet I couldn't remember
Speaker 1: the other day lethal weapon? And then Ross hijacked it
Speaker 1: with Joe Dirt. It's crazy.
Speaker 2: I'm pretty much sure last ninety nine percent Joe Dirt,
Speaker 2: but you're allowed to think it's lethal weapon. We agree
Speaker 2: to disagree.
Speaker 1: Here, we're Danny Glover sitting on a toilet with a
Speaker 1: bomb strap to it. You think that's Joe Dirt versus.
Speaker 2: There was a scene in Joe Dirt we had a
Speaker 2: bomb strap to him.
Speaker 1: Danny Glover did actor Danny Lover from you know, you
Speaker 1: know him from Predator to was that also Joe Dirt?
Speaker 1: Was Joe Dirt being chased by an alien hunter in
Speaker 1: the streets?
Speaker 2: So is she going to be running? It's called running man,
Speaker 2: And just where's the record? You're you are against miss
Speaker 2: Sweeney running watching them?
Speaker 1: I'm against for bastardization of Schwarzenegger flicks. That's what I'm against.
Speaker 1: Look what happened when they Look what happened, what they
Speaker 1: did with the last Terminator. Come on, that's unforgivable. Now,
Speaker 1: if they don't show her with like magical ninja skills
Speaker 1: at one time, you know, going all be a trix
Speaker 1: from kill Bill with no formal training, then yeah, if
Speaker 1: they just want to chase her around and tell the
Speaker 1: prey you know, it's like Gazelle's right if it was,
Speaker 1: because you're not gonna win a fight with a lion,
Speaker 1: so you got to have the cardio, so you've got
Speaker 1: to be doing a lot of running. I'm just saying
Speaker 1: that there's other projects that they can do. So do
Speaker 1: you think she has black eyes by the end of
Speaker 1: the movie from the contestant she has to fight? Is
Speaker 1: what I mean? Will they show that she's a little
Speaker 1: vulnerable or will they go full And I don't know
Speaker 1: this is this is all Hollywood speculation, but I'm very nervous,
Speaker 1: all right? Eight eight eight nine three four seven eight
Speaker 1: seven four. It's eight point fifteen here on the Cacode
Speaker 1: radio program, speaking of women in movies. Apparently it's not
Speaker 1: good enough for activists. We'll share that with you. And
Speaker 1: this Secret Service story.
Speaker 6: Is insane and is like, is as corrupt a scene
Speaker 6: that you might see in some Hollywood thriller starring Sydney
Speaker 6: Sweeney running as as as you can possibly remember, And yet.
Speaker 1: And yet people are just like a whole hum about this.
Speaker 1: So if you don't know what the story is originally reported,
Speaker 1: but was it real clear politics? I believe, And now's yes,
Speaker 1: real clear politics. Who had three sources within Secret Service?
Speaker 1: Who are now talking about what happened with the cocaine
Speaker 1: in the White House. If you don't know the story,
Speaker 1: I'm going to tell you about it coming up next
Speaker 1: here on the KCO Day radio program. Ever seen ross
Speaker 1: so pumped about a Hollywood eighties movie remake? But that's fine,
Speaker 1: we'll see in the rat So. The rap on Sidney
Speaker 1: Sweeney is she's actually conservative, right, is that because I
Speaker 1: saw people that were trying to run that thing. I
Speaker 1: had no yeah, yeah, yeah, because apparently her family is
Speaker 1: and like some family members like nah, she's you know,
Speaker 1: but she also it's it still shows you what's going
Speaker 1: on in Hollywood where it's like I am so here
Speaker 1: by the way for any of you Onion, so listening,
Speaker 1: not not that any well, there are a couple actually
Speaker 1: in the Raleigh area. The worst thing going on right
Speaker 1: now is all of these piece of garbage influencers like
Speaker 1: Jack Posovic and Charlie Kirk who have access to these
Speaker 1: political mailing lists, who are spamming my inbox. So now
Speaker 1: I'm have to go block him on Twitter. I'm getting
Speaker 1: who's the who's the local dude? The young guy? Oh,
Speaker 1: what is his damn name? We interviewed him one time
Speaker 1: and then he was too good for us, talking about
Speaker 1: Stephen Hord No no, no, no, no, Ry Ryan something
Speaker 1: or other. I got spammed with some of his stoles. Yeah, okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: that dude, and it's like the first thing I do
Speaker 1: is now I just purg you from my life because
Speaker 1: they're out of the sheer audacis who start spamming my email.
Speaker 1: I've got more Charlie Kirk Jack Pisobic emails this morning.
Speaker 1: Look at that Kirk's In the last twenty minutes, Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk has sent me three different they're not the same email,
Speaker 1: And it's just like, how do you think people want
Speaker 1: anything to do with you? Hell, half the time you're
Speaker 1: wrong with the crap that you post.
Speaker 2: I think I blocked Charlie Kirk a while ago and
Speaker 2: the Juneteenth stuff when him and Kansas Owens were freaking
Speaker 2: out over it. Oh, like, hey, bring on another holiday.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, in the same way that Ross is like
Speaker 1: you're running, man, Try that sounds good? Yeah? Is there running?
Speaker 1: Because you know what that's Ross takes lemons, make lemonade.
Speaker 1: That's his thing, so super positive, influences the whole full
Speaker 1: team around here. So let's see, all right, that's our
Speaker 1: Hollywood section. Dude, you want some you want some delicious irony?
Speaker 1: Do you guys remember Harrison Butker, the kicker for the
Speaker 1: Kansas City Chiefs, right, and uh what was it? It
Speaker 1: was a graduation speech, right, he was. He was speaking
Speaker 1: at a college graduation. And it's clear if you listen
Speaker 1: to the totality of it, he's making two arguments that
Speaker 1: if women want to be homemakers, great, If they want
Speaker 1: to go to the career, great, But if you are,
Speaker 1: if you choose to do that, and you think it's
Speaker 1: fine to make fun of women who make the decision
Speaker 1: because you feel they're being subjugated in it, in reality,
Speaker 1: you're not for women making their decisions, which seems like
Speaker 1: a pretty logical argument. Now, don't get me wrong. He
Speaker 1: then got into his preference of stuff, but it was
Speaker 1: clearly his preference, and they're like, we got to cancel him.
Speaker 1: His agency dropped him. If you remember, his agent dropped
Speaker 1: him over the you know, the sheer stupidity, because that's
Speaker 1: what we do well, Harrison Butker is now the highest
Speaker 1: paid NFL kicker ever. Yes, that's right. The three time
Speaker 1: Super Bowl winner sparked outrage after telling him graduating class
Speaker 1: that his success was all because quote, a girl I
Speaker 1: met in band class back in middle school would convert
Speaker 1: to the faith, become my wife, and embrace one of
Speaker 1: the most important titles of all time, homemaker. So he's
Speaker 1: literally talking about his family just while I think Bucker's
Speaker 1: weighed in on Biden's abortion stuff too. I think was
Speaker 1: something else he said, But all this was for him
Speaker 1: to cancel. Can you imagine being the agent who knee
Speaker 1: jerk reacted to this, and because you know what he did,
Speaker 1: Bucker went and negotiated it himself. He just said, fine,
Speaker 1: I'll do it myself. And so you're an agent who
Speaker 1: if you'd have waited what three months? Three months, you'd
Speaker 1: have had what ten twelve percent of what is six
Speaker 1: point four million per year? So the total is twenty
Speaker 1: six million with eighteen guaranteed, so you'd have had ten
Speaker 1: percent of that. You absolute adults. It's very fickle.
Speaker 2: It's a Bob Sugar move.
Speaker 1: What do you mean? Oh no, no, it's no is
Speaker 1: it is that a Bob Sugar? You want to Jerry maguire.
Speaker 2: You don't want a Bob Sugar.
Speaker 1: Jerry had some growing up to do. It was clear,
Speaker 1: and frankly, that's so you go here. Yeah, he didn't
Speaker 1: go with Jerry McGuire either, He went with himself and
Speaker 1: now he makes the most money doing what he does. Look,
Speaker 1: I know you got no love for the Kansas City Chiefs,
Speaker 1: but you gotta you gotta, you gotta think this is
Speaker 1: pretty funny, right.
Speaker 2: No, especially considering all the drama surrounding other players. And
Speaker 2: the chiefs like, this is not the guy you have
Speaker 2: to worry about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a very good point. Yeah, and now that
Speaker 1: agent doesn't get his new beach house, I'm so sad.
Speaker 1: Good news, bad news. I guess there's a lot of
Speaker 1: ways to handicap this, so we'll go ahead and do that.
Speaker 1: But we got we got to tell you about what's
Speaker 1: coming to a college campus near you. But first the
Speaker 1: Secret Service story. All right, ready, I didn't have enough
Speaker 1: time in the last segment, so I want to get
Speaker 1: to this. So on Monday, the Secret Service did confirm
Speaker 1: that it disposed of the cocaine found last year at
Speaker 1: the White House, which is kind of a big deal.
Speaker 1: And this was this was part and parcel about a
Speaker 1: furies of stories that were coming out earlier this week
Speaker 1: by Real Clear Politics, who cited several sources within the
Speaker 1: Secret Service. And I find it interesting now that the
Speaker 1: hold on let me my sprite. Drinking a sprite this morning.
Speaker 1: I don't generally drink fool sugar sodas, but it's happening,
Speaker 1: so anyway, just pretend it's a beer. Anyway, So anyway,
Speaker 1: the Secret Service sources told Real Clear Politics it wasn't
Speaker 1: just because you have to understand the Secret Service policy
Speaker 1: for any evidence, with some exceptions like you know, explosive
Speaker 1: devices things like that, the policy is to hold on
Speaker 1: to anything that's part of an official, official investigation for
Speaker 1: seven years. It's a retention policy. It's pretty simple. All
Speaker 1: law enforcement agencies, anyone who collects evidence has some sort
Speaker 1: of stated retention policy. So for them to eleven days
Speaker 1: later after they closed the investigation to simply destroy it,
Speaker 1: that's not good, and that's putting it mildly. However, it's
Speaker 1: far more insidious if the real clear politics story is true.
Speaker 1: According to their reporting, the director, obviously the now departed
Speaker 1: Kimberly Cheatle, became quote really pee word off. I don't
Speaker 1: know if I should say that. But when her request
Speaker 1: was rebuffed, what was the request? According to the reporting,
Speaker 1: Cheetle ordered subordinates to destroy the cocaine. However, met internal
Speaker 1: opposition by some people who probably figured out that one
Speaker 1: that's not legal. Two they would be the scapegoat if
Speaker 1: they followed those orders. But apparently somebody did, or Cheatle
Speaker 1: flushed at herself like a drug raid on cops where
Speaker 1: you hear the toilet going in the other room and
Speaker 1: you know they know what's up. So the subordinates who
Speaker 1: quote cited protocols requiring evidence to be retained for seven years,
Speaker 1: initially told her they wouldn't do it. Two sources told
Speaker 1: the outlet the cheetle or someone speaking at her direction
Speaker 1: then called the agency's forensic division, the supervisor Matt White.
Speaker 1: So he's the guy, and every one of these you know,
Speaker 1: he's the old guy works in the basement right where
Speaker 1: all of the uh, all the lot law enforcement guys
Speaker 1: go down there, sign in, sign out evidence. That's the dude,
Speaker 1: and asked him to dispose of the evidence because quote
Speaker 1: leadership wanted to close the case. Now, whether it was
Speaker 1: White who destroyed it or if he was one of
Speaker 1: the subordinates that pushed back and somebody else had to,
Speaker 1: we don't know, Boston Paul. I pretend if it's a beer,
Speaker 1: just have a beer. I don't know. I'm not quite
Speaker 1: too the uh drinking on the show phase of the
Speaker 1: storied radio career, but I'll get there one day, Boston Paul.
Speaker 1: Don't worry like you know, like that bitter cop who's
Speaker 1: a PI now has got a bottle of gut rot
Speaker 1: whiskey in his drawer. I strive to one day achieve that.
Speaker 1: But you have a beer if you want. Anyway, So
Speaker 1: the Secret Service closed its investigation just eleven days after
Speaker 1: the cocaine was found, without interviewing any potential suspects. So
Speaker 1: that's number one. Number two, and this is what makes
Speaker 1: it more egregious and more scummy and more cover uppie,
Speaker 1: if that's a word. Additional sources. So now they have
Speaker 1: five people on the record. Now they're not identified, and
Speaker 1: you know how I feel about anonymous sources, so take
Speaker 1: it for what it's worth. Said that during the eleven
Speaker 1: days they had had they hit a DNA match, which
Speaker 1: there had been some reporting, but one that was a
Speaker 1: partial hit within and a national database, meaning they weren't
Speaker 1: just able to get DNA or partial DNA from it,
Speaker 1: which was the reporting. They entered it into the system
Speaker 1: and it popped. I'm gonna say that again. They found
Speaker 1: DNA on it. It then popped within a system in
Speaker 1: the national database. So NCIC, I guess or whatever, I guess,
Speaker 1: there's actually a DNA portion of this. And after it popped,
Speaker 1: they didn't interview anybody, and then they disposed of it
Speaker 1: outside of the boundaries of their own retention policy. This
Speaker 1: is the stuff you see in movies, right. This is
Speaker 1: the other half of the revisionist history that the media provides.
Speaker 1: Ross and I were talking off the air. Can you
Speaker 1: imagine all the stuff we don't know if they're willing
Speaker 1: to operate in a time when it should be a
Speaker 1: lot harder to get away with this because there's so
Speaker 1: much digital res of what happened. You think these cats
Speaker 1: didn't see what happened and Nixon back in the day
Speaker 1: and started girding their loins on stuff like this. So
Speaker 1: you had a hit, even if when you say, it's
Speaker 1: a partial hit and it may not hold up in court,
Speaker 1: which I understand that there's a certain threshold that you
Speaker 1: have to hit. But you then don't go interview anybody.
Speaker 1: And the director of the Secret Service is making phone
Speaker 1: calls to the evidence locker saying, hey, I need you
Speaker 1: to destroy evidence. What it does show is, even though
Speaker 1: they may have people on record, if this is all true,
Speaker 1: it shows you that simply replacing a couple of people
Speaker 1: at the top might have no fundamental change if those
Speaker 1: all along the way are willing to go along with
Speaker 1: excuse me, along with this stuff to destroy evidence, to
Speaker 1: do any of that. It's the corruptness of law enforcement
Speaker 1: practices that is that when I talk about it being
Speaker 1: part of a mood, it's always a hallmark of whoever
Speaker 1: the villain's going to turn out to be right, it's
Speaker 1: the corrupt leader of this thing, or the cabinet member
Speaker 1: who actually killed the president's mistress. It also was on match.
Speaker 1: I can't remember what that movie was, but I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the stuff, dude, and this is the reporting
Speaker 1: that's out there. And Chetle she retired or she you know,
Speaker 1: she walked away. But through the failure of what happened
Speaker 1: with Trump coupled with this, the woman might or at
Speaker 1: least very should be facing some sort of prosecution that
Speaker 1: flimsy your evidence on J six people. But she won't
Speaker 1: because of the position of power that she held. Did
Speaker 1: anyone who helped destroy evidence, and frankly anyone who didn't
Speaker 1: within this who did push back. Again, I think some
Speaker 1: of the pushback was not because they disagreed, but rather
Speaker 1: they realized that if it ever came out, they'd be
Speaker 1: the scapegoat. They'd be the patsy here. Oh no, oh,
Speaker 1: the director didn't know anything about it. It was this
Speaker 1: mid level manager who did it. He's a rogue employee,
Speaker 1: like they've seen this movie before. Those people shouldn't be
Speaker 1: in a position of power, and that position of power
Speaker 1: could be as minimal as somebody who's an investigator, you know,
Speaker 1: standard investigator. Everyone involved in this investigation, who got a
Speaker 1: DNA hit and then watched as the director allegedly tried
Speaker 1: to destroy the evidence. Who didn't come forward and say something?
Speaker 1: And you don't have to come forward to the media.
Speaker 1: You have to be dropping tips to the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: But you know there is oversight to the extent that
Speaker 1: there is, and there are members of Congress that provide oversight,
Speaker 1: who are you know, would love to take this like
Speaker 1: a dog with a stick and run with it. Man
Speaker 1: and the corruption man, just the absolute corruption. There's no
Speaker 1: valid excuse if either of these things came to pass.
Speaker 1: And will it go anywhere, I don't know, But I
Speaker 1: do know that if Donald Trumps serious about purshing, he's
Speaker 1: going to have a heavy lift on his hands. And
Speaker 1: likely there might be agencies who are not able to
Speaker 1: perform certain duties, and that'll have to be an argument
Speaker 1: that they make. But you can't have this level of corruption,
Speaker 1: I promise you if you got busted at the White
Speaker 1: House with one hundred dollars worth of blow, something bad's
Speaker 1: gonna happen to you, all right, eight forty four raced agic.
Speaker 1: Once again we're talking about cocaine. That's what we do here. Well,
Speaker 1: thanks again, I can mix it up. Do you slease
Speaker 1: do this? Did you see the meth lettuce? No? Oh? Man? Yeah? Uh,
Speaker 1: FED sees record forty eight million worth of meth hidden
Speaker 1: in lettuce shipments from Mexico. Shock can oh yeah? What
Speaker 1: else would come from? I think, honestly, I think this
Speaker 1: is a brilliant marketing employee for big Lettuce. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: I could look. Yeah, cocaine bunny, Yeah, like people, I
Speaker 1: don't like lattice. Man vers that it gives you wings?
Speaker 1: You like it?
Speaker 5: Now?
Speaker 1: Yeah, you can be addicted to the lettuce. Man, They're
Speaker 1: gonna sell so much lettuce. But I can't prove it,
Speaker 1: so we'll see, all right, man, Yeah?
Speaker 5: No, yeah, Well I wish I had better news, but
Speaker 5: it really starts going downhill this afternoon. For the rest
Speaker 5: of the week, we're in rain and thunderstorms, rounds of it.
Speaker 5: Will there be breaks at times, yes, especially today as
Speaker 5: below pulls back out over the tropical Storm Debbi the
Speaker 5: open waters of the Atlantic, So it does pull a
Speaker 5: little bit further east and away from us briefly, but
Speaker 5: then as we go on through Tomorrow and Thursday just
Speaker 5: kind of meanders around off South Carolina coast and eventually
Speaker 5: they come back on shore and it's gonna push back
Speaker 5: closer to us. So the worst days of the week
Speaker 5: are probably going to be as we get into Wednesday
Speaker 5: night and Thursday and maybe even on into a part
Speaker 5: of Friday, when heavy rain coming in.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm people hate it when I interrupt you on
Speaker 1: this stuff. But no, so when you say it goes offshore,
Speaker 1: do we so it? Then we'll have to make landfall
Speaker 1: back in North Carolina.
Speaker 5: Right, it's right now, They got to project and make
Speaker 5: landfall in South Carolina.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, just North Charleston, Okay, all right, puts
Speaker 1: pretty close to the border though, oh no, South damage,
Speaker 1: don't damage myrtle dirty myrtle man.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well, they're gonna get a pretty good bath on
Speaker 5: shore flow. They'll be on the east side, luckily Charleston
Speaker 5: for them, they won't be on the east side at
Speaker 5: least to the current trajectory, current path. And then it
Speaker 5: comes back on shore meandas around for a couple of days.
Speaker 5: Eventually it'll get caught up and go north and could
Speaker 5: have impact the northeast and New England as a depression
Speaker 5: or a weak tropical storm.
Speaker 1: But we've got a lot of.
Speaker 5: Rain to deal with them, flooding rain and flood watches
Speaker 5: which started, which start I think tomorrow as the rain
Speaker 5: picks up eight to ten inches, some could get more.
Speaker 5: It could be fifteen inch totals to the east and
Speaker 5: south of us triad four to six inches. That's a
Speaker 5: lot of rain. Oh yeah, it'll come over a few days. Yeah,
Speaker 5: it'll come over a few days. But still it's gonna
Speaker 5: be problems with flooding. If you're in a flood prone area,
Speaker 5: prepare now. There'll be some gusty winds at times. I
Speaker 5: would prepare anyway, not only for the water, but maybe
Speaker 5: for some body power outages too. You know, if that
Speaker 5: water gets in places it's not supposed to get into.
Speaker 5: Uh and we get a wind gust and we get
Speaker 5: some bands of stronger thunderstorms and that could be enough
Speaker 5: with the saturated ground to pull some trees down. So
Speaker 5: uh yeah, will be here tomorrow to talk a lot
Speaker 5: more about it, and uh, you know, we'll be able
Speaker 5: to see if there's been any changes and see if
Speaker 5: the forecast is on track. You don't want it to be.
Speaker 5: You don't want it to stall out like this. This
Speaker 5: is worst case scenario for a races.
Speaker 1: What happened. This is what happened with one of the
Speaker 1: hurricanes a few years ago in North Carolin. Remember it
Speaker 1: just came Was it opped there? Right?
Speaker 6: Up?
Speaker 5: It war mad? I can't was one of the one
Speaker 5: or the other, the.
Speaker 1: One that flooded Newborn. It's stopped right literally like this.
Speaker 1: We're talking about this on the air. The speed had
Speaker 1: dropped to essentially zero, and you were saying, this is
Speaker 1: not good. This is really bad.
Speaker 5: So yeah, we're still at seven. But when you see
Speaker 5: stationary or it starts moving like one or two miles
Speaker 5: an hour, that's when you're kind of like age. Yeah,
Speaker 5: and hopefully it'll move quicker. I want this to be wrong,
Speaker 5: but oh god, it is suggesting that it's not to.
Speaker 1: No, he telling off the air, Ray was saying he
Speaker 1: wants it to go hit Fiji. I don't know if
Speaker 1: it would be a pattern not Fiji's what's the Bermuda. Yeah, Bermuda,
Speaker 1: wishing death on Bermuda. So anyway, all right, we got
Speaker 1: a roll stirt, Thank you very much, appreciate it, bye,
Speaker 1: and we'll be back, can you No, No, apparently not.
Speaker 7: The dust is settling after the big sell off on
Speaker 7: Wall Street, and you may find some stocks you'd like
Speaker 7: to own on sale today. Goldman Sachs says four decades
Speaker 7: worth of data suggesting that buying stocks after sell offs
Speaker 7: on the scale we've seen over the last month is
Speaker 7: usually profitable, and it looks like we'll see some bargain
Speaker 7: hunting today.
Speaker 1: Futures are a little bit higher.
Speaker 7: Right across the board now, futures are up one hundred
Speaker 7: and forty five points. Delta Airlines extended the pause on
Speaker 7: its New York to Tel Aviv service through the end
Speaker 7: of this month, the carrier sighting the ongoing conflict in
Speaker 7: the Middle East. The mining slump has hit the parent
Speaker 7: of Taco Bell, KFC and Pizza Hut. Young Brands posted
Speaker 7: weaker than expected second quarter sales as consumers worldwide cut
Speaker 7: back on fast foods, and Casey, the Florida based restaurant
Speaker 7: chain World of Beer, Bar and Kitchen, has filed for bankruptcy.
Speaker 7: The company does have some outlets in North Carolina. It
Speaker 7: hopes to restructure its operations and remain in business.
Speaker 1: Case, that's too bad. They got one over at North Hills,
Speaker 1: and I might have been in there a few times,
Speaker 1: so all right, they have so they're going to keep
Speaker 1: operating though, right because at this point that's their hope. Yes, okay, good, good, good,
Speaker 1: all right, thank you, sir. I do appreciate it. Have
Speaker 1: a good day. Yeah, there you go. Jeff Pillinger from
Speaker 1: Bloomberg News. Oh well, hopefully Biden can save that as well,
Speaker 1: because he's got quite a track record here of saving stuff.
Speaker 3: Sure.
Speaker 1: Good. Congress heard the economy, environment, any environment, good good good.
Speaker 1: So apparently that's how everything got fixed yesterday, the economy
Speaker 1: and end of the environment. So also you get a
Speaker 1: little breaking news here. Associated press quote. Vice President Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris has decided on a running mate. In an announcement
Speaker 1: he is coming in quote hour.
Speaker 2: Just Clothes TV just put out like thirty seconds ago
Speaker 2: that she has chosen Tim Walls to.
Speaker 1: D Ui Walls. You know, my favorite Tim Walls story
Speaker 1: is when he was younger, he got a Dui to
Speaker 1: a ninety six and a fifty five and then pretended
Speaker 1: to be deaf.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I was reading about that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's a true story. Yeah, he's like, oh
Speaker 1: I can't hear. It's like that he's responding to commands
Speaker 1: and they're like you sure, you sure you can't hear?
Speaker 1: But whatever, young and dumb, right, And speaking of young
Speaker 1: and dumb, the the college takeover for the pro homascats
Speaker 1: that will resume when school resumes. I have a question
Speaker 1: because most of these big universities are open during the summer.
Speaker 1: I've taken summer university courses. Why'd you all leave if
Speaker 1: this is the if there's literally a genocide going on.
Speaker 1: Because if I thought there was a genocide going on,
Speaker 1: and I've decided that I'm gonna, you know, make it
Speaker 1: my point to stop a genocide, I'm not leaving for
Speaker 1: three months to go to South Podway with my friends
Speaker 1: or whatever they were doing. I hope they weren't. Man,
Speaker 1: they're just ruined the the look there. But could I
Speaker 1: recommend some for universities before they get back landscaping right ross?
Speaker 1: What is what is greener? A quad that it looks
Speaker 1: like Central Park with grass and all that or cacti.
Speaker 1: We use very little water, require very little maintenance, right,
Speaker 1: so you swap the quads for cactus and you save
Speaker 1: all that. It's very green, very environmentally friendly. And I
Speaker 1: want to watch them pitch tents, but no, they say
Speaker 1: they're coming back and they're going to go right back
Speaker 1: into protest mode, which again they didn't feel necessary during
Speaker 1: during the summer when they wanted to go a you know,
Speaker 1: van life blogging or vlogging or backpacking in Europe. They
Speaker 1: apparently that was all on hold. So far, groups at Columbia, Rutgers,
Speaker 1: George Washington, and Harvard have announced they will be doing
Speaker 1: it again. I look to see if UNC is going
Speaker 1: to be back at it. I think after you guys
Speaker 1: got shamed by the frat bros