Speaker 1: Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
Speaker 1: is the number, Marlene in Waltham. I know you've been
Speaker 1: holding patiently, Marlene. Thank you and welcome.
Speaker 2: Hi Jess, Hi Marlene.
Speaker 3: Awesome. I am so glad we're doing this. I have
Speaker 3: three points, but one already was the twelve million dollars
Speaker 3: steal dots year that was paid by the Clinton You're
Speaker 3: already touched on that. But I have called before since
Speaker 3: twenty sixteen saying what about the Gang of eight? Rubio
Speaker 3: isn't the Gang of eight? He was even Intelligence chairman
Speaker 3: once upon a time. He knows everything, just his way
Speaker 3: back then Gang of eight, the Intelligence Committee which included Hellosi, Schumer, McConnell.
Speaker 3: You name is Schwawell. Shift and don't leave out Mitt Romney,
Speaker 3: who was the only Republican who voted to peach Trump
Speaker 3: convict Trump. Why would that be, Marlene.
Speaker 1: I'm just curious. Do you think we're going to actually
Speaker 1: see prosecutions of some of these very senior officials in
Speaker 1: the Obama regime. Are we going to see Andy McCabe,
Speaker 1: James Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Hillary Obama? Are we going to
Speaker 1: see them in handcuffs or do you think that the
Speaker 1: Democrats and the media are going to succeed, because they are.
Speaker 1: I mean, they are desperately, furiously now trying to bury
Speaker 1: this story. They're going after Gabbard, They're trying to delegitimize her,
Speaker 1: destroy her, attack her viciously. They keep going on about
Speaker 1: the Epstein files. They don't want to cover this. They
Speaker 1: refuse to even cover the press conference yesterday. They are
Speaker 1: furiously doing everything they can to try to sweep this
Speaker 1: on or the rug. Are they going to succeed or
Speaker 1: do you think people will finally be held accountable? Will
Speaker 1: we get justice?
Speaker 3: People will be held accountable because Trump is there only
Speaker 3: for a for a while, and this is it. This
Speaker 3: is the only chance we have. So I'm gonna go
Speaker 3: with yes, they will, because we need consequences. Consequences have
Speaker 3: to come up. We've been waiting that for a trillion years,
Speaker 3: so this is our only chance. So I'm going to
Speaker 3: say yes, yes, yes, stay true. And I think that Rubio,
Speaker 3: since he sits beside the president all the time, he
Speaker 3: is speaking out, I think I think he might be
Speaker 3: helping Gabbard. He knows a lot. I've said that before
Speaker 3: in your show, you asked me once, well, aren't you
Speaker 3: voting for Rubio? He's Cuban and you're Cuban. And I said, no,
Speaker 3: I'm not. I'm voting for Trump, and not just because
Speaker 3: he's Cuban. But I knew he was in the Gang
Speaker 3: of Eight, and I knew he knows a lot. I
Speaker 3: wouldn't pass anything.
Speaker 1: But I think that's a really good point. No, Marine,
Speaker 1: it's a very perceptive point. Look, he was chair of
Speaker 1: the Senate Intelligence Committee and they investigated the Russia collusion hoax.
Speaker 1: So and a lot of this stuff was, you know,
Speaker 1: behind closed doors. You know, secret testimony. Information is classified.
Speaker 1: He's not able to talk about it in public. I
Speaker 1: think Rubio knows where a lot of the bodies are buried.
Speaker 1: I agree with you, and I wouldn't be shocked if
Speaker 1: he's saying, no, you know what, look at this. You
Speaker 1: know I heard from a little birdie. You know that
Speaker 1: there's this report. Really yeah, the CIA val take a look.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: I'm positive that he is helping Trump and Gabbard. I
Speaker 1: don't know if he's the so called you know, deep throat.
Speaker 1: I think it's someone else, But I agree with you.
Speaker 1: I think Rubio is helping them. Every step of the way,
Speaker 1: because every time the Democrats and Obama in particular, tried
Speaker 1: to lie, Telca Gabbart has a counter with more evidence,
Speaker 1: more declassified documents, more proof. I mean, now it's beyond
Speaker 1: it's it's beyond the shadow of a doubt to me,
Speaker 1: I don't know how much more evidence you need. She's
Speaker 1: gonna pour it on the parentice now, whistleblowers coming out,
Speaker 1: so she's just going to keep pouring it on and
Speaker 1: pouring it on and pouring it on. But we have
Speaker 1: more than enough evidence. I mean this, We've got them.
Speaker 1: The only question now is will do we have the will,
Speaker 1: do we have the courage, the bravery, you know, to
Speaker 1: finally start putting handcuffs on some of these people? And
Speaker 1: that is that's PAMBONDI Now that's cash Ptel. Now they
Speaker 1: have to deliver. Marlene. Thank you very much for that call.
Speaker 1: John in the great state of Texas. Thanks for holding
Speaker 1: John and welcome it.
Speaker 5: Sure is a great state. Listening to you live on
Speaker 5: top Stream Live and you're always number one at this
Speaker 5: time slot.
Speaker 1: Just thought i' oh, thank you, thank you, John.
Speaker 5: No problem, Hey, this is all a show. I'm not
Speaker 5: optimistic with this administration. The same administration pushing these mr
Speaker 5: Anda jabs. How long is this going to sit on
Speaker 5: Pam's desk this time? What they should have done is
Speaker 5: they would have had all these criminal referrals on Pam's
Speaker 5: desk and then do some rating of homes like mar
Speaker 5: lago On, Brennan Clapper, Rice McCabe, call Me, et cetera,
Speaker 5: all of them, and then the media would have been
Speaker 5: forced to cover this because it's not on mainstream. Still,
Speaker 5: none of this is they're hiding it. You just said
Speaker 5: that yourself. So if they were really taking this seriously,
Speaker 5: we would have woken up in the morning. And I'm
Speaker 5: just a regular guy from Texas. It's not hard to
Speaker 5: figure out. We would have woke up one morning, turned
Speaker 5: on the news, and you'd see ten people's houses raided
Speaker 5: in the middle of the morning when we were all
Speaker 5: sleeping going to work to pay our taxes. Okay, So
Speaker 5: I think this is all not I think everybody's getting
Speaker 5: all hyped up, pumped up, and this is just another
Speaker 5: pony show. And I'm wondering which Republicans are gonna be
Speaker 5: against this. I mean, it's just how long is this
Speaker 5: going to sit on Pam's desk? And give them time
Speaker 5: to bleach bit their hard drives and their signal apps
Speaker 5: on their phones. Why why did why did we find
Speaker 5: this out before they did the rating? What raids? There's
Speaker 5: not going to be a raid. It's all a pony
Speaker 5: show man. So I let's talk, Jeff John, let.
Speaker 1: Me ask you. Do you think, uh Tulci Gabbard is
Speaker 1: part of the dog and pony show. I just want
Speaker 1: to sort of because I agree with you. I would
Speaker 1: have gone listen, I'm with you, man, all the way
Speaker 1: I would have done the raids. I would have done
Speaker 1: the criminal referrals. I would have gone in with you know,
Speaker 1: four o'clock in the morning, I'm serious, would have tipped
Speaker 1: and use Max or whatever somebody at Fox or and
Speaker 1: you know, have the cameras right there, shock and all.
Speaker 1: But I'm just curious. It seems to me that in
Speaker 1: many ways, Tulsi Gabbard is almost forced Bondie to investigate
Speaker 1: and potentially prosecute the way she just you know, she
Speaker 1: kept from the beginning. She's like, Okay, no, no, we're
Speaker 1: not going to sweep this under the rug. Here is
Speaker 1: what I'm declassifying, and I've notified Pam Bondi in the
Speaker 1: DJ she keeps saying that. Then she said, I've put it.
Speaker 1: You know, they should be indicted, they need to be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: Then she said I'm sending a criminal referral. Then yesterday
Speaker 1: she said, I've said the criminal referral about Obama. Okay, look,
Speaker 1: I love the point that John in Texas is making.
Speaker 1: He's asking the big question, is this all nothing but
Speaker 1: a dog and pony show in which in the end
Speaker 1: it's all full of sound and fury. Shakespeare famously wrote
Speaker 1: signifying nothing meaning yes, you know, it's making a lot
Speaker 1: of news. People are upset about it. It's it makes
Speaker 1: for riveting radio, rivoting television. But in the end, if
Speaker 1: they were truly serious, wouldn't criminal referrals have already been
Speaker 1: sent out? Wouldn't arrests have already been made. Instead, they're
Speaker 1: telegraphing their move, and by telegraphing their move, they're giving
Speaker 1: these criminals time to destroy evidence, cover their tracks. John,
Speaker 1: I want to ask you, do you think Tulsi is
Speaker 1: part of the dog and pony show as well? Or
Speaker 1: because I mean, you may disagree with me, but it
Speaker 1: seems to me it's almost like she's trying to will
Speaker 1: push almost shame Pam Bondi into making arrests or am
Speaker 1: I wrong?
Speaker 5: John, You're one hundred percent right. You know, you can
Speaker 5: pretty much gauge people by their reactions. You can look
Speaker 5: them in the face, and Tulsi's been all over all
Speaker 5: over the camera lately during all this. And you can
Speaker 5: also you can also gauge when the enemy, uh, when
Speaker 5: one of our enemies and I'm gonna call them enemies
Speaker 5: because they're the enemy of our country. Obviously, this is
Speaker 5: a treasonous behavior and I'm star Okay, let me go back.
Speaker 5: You can gauge it by the reaction of the bad guys,
Speaker 5: and they are going apoclictic right now, They're going completely nuts,
Speaker 5: and that that kind of tells me that Tulsi really is,
Speaker 5: like you said, pushing this and pushing this. But I
Speaker 5: think she got sawed down and you know, from the
Speaker 5: powers that be, and we'll take over from here. Thank you, Tulsi.
Speaker 5: We got it from here. And then they give us
Speaker 5: all this show on television, You give this all these
Speaker 5: all these you know, press releases that we keep saying.
Speaker 5: I mean, this isn't the way to run an investigation
Speaker 5: if it's ongoing. I mean there's just no way. I
Speaker 5: just I'm not buying any of this. I mean, I agree,
Speaker 5: I agree, I agree Tulsi's the good guy and she
Speaker 5: is pushing it. But I don't see it going any further.
Speaker 5: I don't. I mean, I'd love to wake up in
Speaker 5: the morning and see all those mass arrests. But no,
Speaker 5: they tipped their hand, they tipped their hat. They gave
Speaker 5: them ample time to destroy more evidence. And like I said,
Speaker 5: this is all coming from the same administrations that's still
Speaker 5: pushing these COVID jabs and all the mRNA that you
Speaker 5: know is killing people. So I don't know what to think.
Speaker 5: It's like, it's like a Tom Clancy book is what
Speaker 5: we're going through right now.
Speaker 1: Back to you, Jeff, Well, you know, John, that's that's
Speaker 1: why I got serious doubts about about you know, about
Speaker 1: the DJ about Pam Bondy, and I've been you know,
Speaker 1: critical of her, and my criticism keeps growing and growing
Speaker 1: and growing. And to me, if we don't see arrest
Speaker 1: in the next ten days to two weeks, I said
Speaker 1: it after Friday's document ump, but after yesterday, I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, I mean, seriously, even a blind man, you know,
Speaker 1: as one of our callers likes to say, even Ray
Speaker 1: Charles can see this now. Obama's guilty as sin. I mean,
Speaker 1: they've got him, they've got him six ways to Sunday.
Speaker 1: They've got Brennan, they've got Clapper, they've got Camy, they've
Speaker 1: got them all. I mean, that's what's incredible. When you
Speaker 1: go through this and she just keeps giving you more
Speaker 1: documents and we're talking memos, emails, and I gotta say, John,
Speaker 1: just you know, as an historian now as an analyst,
Speaker 1: how stupid Obama is, Like I never want to hear again.
Speaker 1: How smart these people are to put all this down
Speaker 1: in writing like this, to leave such a paper trayal
Speaker 1: like this. I mean, yeah, they're very arrogant. You could,
Speaker 1: I mean you can. They really thought they were going
Speaker 1: to be in power forever. But still, my god, they
Speaker 1: were stupid, I mean, careless, sloppy, stupid act. This goes
Speaker 1: to court. They're finished, They're finished. John. I love your call.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, my six one seven two six
Speaker 1: six sixty eight sixty eight, CJ, I Boston, Thanks for holding, CJ.
Speaker 1: And welcome.
Speaker 6: Thank you very much for taking the call.
Speaker 1: Jol, my pleasure, CJ.
Speaker 6: He was a gentleman, Frank E. Mcgarrin, a typewriter expert,
Speaker 6: and the Remington typewriter in eighteen eighty nine a type
Speaker 6: on that typewriter. Now is the time for all good
Speaker 6: men to come to the aid of the country. We've
Speaker 6: got seventy seven million people at least have voted for
Speaker 6: Donald Trump at It's time that they get on the phone,
Speaker 6: call their elected officials and demand of something be done
Speaker 6: regarding this. The problem that this administration has is giving
Speaker 6: the enemy aka the Democratic Communist Party heads up on
Speaker 6: the action that they may be thinking about taking. The
Speaker 6: arrest should have been made and then they should have
Speaker 6: gone public with this.
Speaker 1: Fall.
Speaker 6: If Donald Trump does not take action on this, what
Speaker 6: he will be putting a gold stamp on is that
Speaker 6: there is a double kid justice system in this country.
Speaker 6: That's why his administration needs to take decisive action to
Speaker 6: get the people involved in this and get them arrested.
Speaker 6: Obama being the farmer commander in chief, this warrant is
Speaker 6: a military tribuneau, not a civilian trial. The Warrens alitary Tribunau,
Speaker 6: where he needs to be tried in a military court
Speaker 6: for treason against the United States. This is what the
Speaker 6: Democratic Party has become Jeff, You've got a communist Mandani
Speaker 6: in New York, self proclaimed communist running for the mayor
Speaker 6: of the City of New York. This is which happened
Speaker 6: to our country. The Democrats are on an all time low.
Speaker 6: If this is shown to be true and proven and
Speaker 6: there are convictions, this will put the last remaining neil
Speaker 6: in the coffin of the Democratic Communist Party in this country.
Speaker 6: What they've done is they've not only try to overturn
Speaker 6: an election, they try to put a president, a standing
Speaker 6: president of the United States in jail on bogus charges.
Speaker 6: And we could talk all day long, we can talk
Speaker 6: until the cows come home about how governments like in
Speaker 6: Venezuela and other countries control the people, and talking about control.
Speaker 6: This could not have happened without the mainstream media. They
Speaker 6: pushed this. Now the President appoints the head of the FCC.
Speaker 6: The FCC needs to investigate these mainstream media outlets and
Speaker 6: to investigate their participation in this hoax and whether or
Speaker 6: not they knowingly participate it in this hoax, and if so,
Speaker 6: take appropriate action against the mainstream media. I would just
Speaker 6: hope that anyone that cares about their country, whether regardless
Speaker 6: of your political affiliations, take a look at the mirror.
Speaker 6: Take a look in the mirror. Take a look in
Speaker 6: the mirror, and see what your country has become, especially
Speaker 6: the Democrats out there. It's become a country where who
Speaker 6: you vote for doesn't matter, because if they win, you
Speaker 6: have people in this country who want to put them
Speaker 6: in jail on bogus charges. So, in ending, I would
Speaker 6: just like to say this, Jeff Trump and his administration
Speaker 6: needs to be quiet, make arrests, and take appropriate action
Speaker 6: to have any every one of these people who were
Speaker 6: involved in this hoax in the overthrow of the President
Speaker 6: of the United States, that they'd be heldfully economal.
Speaker 7: CJ.
Speaker 1: I couldn't agree with you more. I really absolutely not.
Speaker 1: One hundred one thousand percent. And look, if we don't
Speaker 1: get justice now, six one seven two six six sixty eight,
Speaker 1: sixty eight is the number. Okay, just super super quick
Speaker 1: because CJ made the point that and John in Texas
Speaker 1: as well, that you're looking at people close to Obama,
Speaker 1: Obama himself, but even someone like Brennan as an enemy
Speaker 1: of the United States and as an enemy of the
Speaker 1: American people, and that these are essentially communist thugs. And
Speaker 1: what we're watching is is a slow motion or what
Speaker 1: we were what we were watching until Trump stopped them,
Speaker 1: was a slow motion communist revolution. Now a lot of
Speaker 1: people don't know this about Brennan. Brennan was a card
Speaker 1: carrying member of the Communist Party. This is beyond dispute.
Speaker 1: He admitted it himself in nineteen seventy six. And I
Speaker 1: remember this is the man that would eventually become the
Speaker 1: director of the freaking CIA. In nineteen seventy six, Brennan
Speaker 1: thought that Jimmy Carter, Jimmy Carter was not radical or
Speaker 1: liberal enough, and so he voted for Gus Hall. Well,
Speaker 1: look it up. You want to know who Gus Hall is.
Speaker 1: Gus Hall was the leader of the American Communist Party,
Speaker 1: which by the way, had direct ties to the Kremlin.
Speaker 1: Then you know the Soviet Union. It was a mouthpiece
Speaker 1: for Soviet Russia, for the Kammis so and they didn't
Speaker 1: hide it. They said, no, no, we support the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: We are an agent. They said, we're an agent of
Speaker 1: the Kremlin. And Brennan voted for Gus Hall.
Speaker 6: So this is what this is.
Speaker 1: Demand they allowed to become the chief spymaster of the
Speaker 1: United States. Now, just very quickly. Again, as an historian,
Speaker 1: I just want to show you that they would lead. Sorry,
Speaker 1: that they would leave such an obvious paper trail is
Speaker 1: so reckless it almost borders on the pathological. This is
Speaker 1: from six one seven. Okay, this is a text I
Speaker 1: got very good text about maybe ten minutes ago. You
Speaker 1: can text us seven zero four seven zero seven zero
Speaker 1: four seven zero, Jeff, why did they leave a paper trail?
Speaker 1: Because they are psychopaths. They squirreled away those intelligence reports
Speaker 1: in the CIA vault for the same reason serial killers
Speaker 1: keep bits of clothing of their victims. They love the trophies.
Speaker 1: When I was the editor of Insight magazine, I had
Speaker 1: a writer. He was a Russian dissident. He was a
Speaker 1: brilliant writer. His name was Andre Piankovski. And by the way,
Speaker 1: he wrote a brilliant book on Putin called Looking Inside
Speaker 1: Putin's Soul, and he had great sources within the Kremlin.
Speaker 1: Long story short, you think Vladimir Putin would ever be
Speaker 1: stupid enough to leave behind a trail where he orders
Speaker 1: the spying on a political opponent, or the murder or
Speaker 1: assassination or the execution of an opponent. Putin would never
Speaker 1: be that dumb. And to give you an example, he
Speaker 1: remember one of the famous dissidents that he killed. It
Speaker 1: was a guy called Litvinenko. It was at a sushi
Speaker 1: bar in London, and that they dropped like some radioactive
Speaker 1: capsule in his drink, like they nuke the guy. They particularly,
Speaker 1: you know, a little mini nuk in a coffee cup.
Speaker 1: And so and Piankovski had a source right there in
Speaker 1: the Kremlin, and this is how it came about. Litvinenko
Speaker 1: was going to blow the whistle. Allegedly that Putin in
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety nine when he was running for president of Madarasha,
Speaker 1: that he needed a war to win. He was down
Speaker 1: in the polls, and so we ordered his FSB friends
Speaker 1: to blow up these apartments in Moscow, which killed Russian civilians.
Speaker 1: But then he pinned it on the Chechens, saying, look
Speaker 1: what they've done, this terrorist atrocity, basically a false flag.
Speaker 1: And then he said, I'm gonna lead a war now
Speaker 1: against Chechnya to punish them for what they've done. So
Speaker 1: Litvinenko was gonna blow the whistle on this. So this
Speaker 1: was at Putin's he's now president. It's been a couple
Speaker 1: of years now, he's in office, and Litvinenko says, I've
Speaker 1: got the goods and I'm gonna release it. At Putin's
Speaker 1: birthday party, where you know, the vodka was flowing, he's
Speaker 1: with his top henchmen, and this is how things are done.
Speaker 1: He doesn't write a memo, he doesn't stand there and
Speaker 1: write emails at Obama. We're gonna frame Donald Trump. Okay,
Speaker 1: we're gonna manufacture intelligence. I want a new intelligence community assessment.
Speaker 1: We're gonna say he was in bed with the Russians,
Speaker 1: he colluded with the Russians. They helped him win. So
Speaker 1: suppress all the other evidence and go and follow my line. No,
Speaker 1: Putin is too smart for that. He tells the people
Speaker 1: his henchmen around them, literally as they're drinking vodka, and
Speaker 1: he says in it with a smile, almost like he's joking.
Speaker 1: Someone needs to take Litvinenko. I can't say the S
Speaker 1: word on the air to the crap house, to the outhouse, okay,
Speaker 1: to the to the to the excrement house. He goes,
Speaker 1: you know, someone needs to take him out there, and
Speaker 1: everyone's like okay. Message registered, and a couple of weeks later,
Speaker 1: Bye bye, they nuke the guy. He didn't put it
Speaker 1: down in writing. Now this is Moscow, this is Russia.
Speaker 1: Putin thinks he's going to be in power till he dies.
Speaker 1: And even he's smart enough, you don't leave any evidence behind.
Speaker 1: You never know what could happen. Now, the most infamous
Speaker 1: Just one more quick point. Most people don't know this.
Speaker 1: Hitler never left behind a paper trail regarding the Holocaust.
Speaker 1: He never did. Now, remember this was his big racial
Speaker 1: project to extermination of the Jews. The closest thing we
Speaker 1: have even that was verbal. The closest thing we have
Speaker 1: to proof that Hitler directly ordered the Holocaust, which of
Speaker 1: course he did. Was the infamous Once Sea Conference nineteen
Speaker 1: forty two in Germany. Long story short, Hitler's top Nazi
Speaker 1: officials meet. Okay, it's now early nineteen forty two. The
Speaker 1: war is not going in the East like they thought,
Speaker 1: and now they're meeting, and Rhinehardt Heidrich, who is basically
Speaker 1: the number two, considered to be the eventual successor to Hitler,
Speaker 1: he oversees this conference and he says, now the Furor
Speaker 1: has made a big decision about the Jewish question, and
Speaker 1: basically that's where they really conclude we're going to go
Speaker 1: all out annihilation, all out extermination, a wide system of
Speaker 1: concentration camps, death camps. We're going to annihilate the Jews.
Speaker 1: We're going to kill every single one of them. And
Speaker 1: of course a lot of the Nazi heads not on
Speaker 1: moral grounds, but they're arguing like, well, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
Speaker 1: This is going to distract a lot of resources. This
Speaker 1: is you know, the people on the economy side are saying, hey,
Speaker 1: come on, we need these Jewish people as workers. The
Speaker 1: military people are saying, so we're going to divert trains
Speaker 1: and and equipment for this when our boys are dying
Speaker 1: on the Eastern Front. So they're not happy with this decision,
Speaker 1: not because they love the Jews, but they're saying, we
Speaker 1: haven't won the This is going to put a tremendous
Speaker 1: burden on us. One of the key people at that
Speaker 1: meeting says, do you have the furor's approval for this?
Speaker 1: Like this is a huge new step. Now we're not
Speaker 1: just going from persecuting Jews and harassing Jews and killing
Speaker 1: them here killing them there. You're talking now about a
Speaker 1: systematic annihilation of an entire people that is going to
Speaker 1: consume a lot of our war effort while we're in
Speaker 1: the middle of a war fighting Russia, Britain and America. Like,
Speaker 1: is this you Reinhardt? Or is this coming straight from
Speaker 1: the boss, the Furor? Because and then he says, because
Speaker 1: I just saw him in Berlin a couple of weeks ago.
Speaker 1: And I asked Hitler, I said, this is killing us
Speaker 1: with international media, that we are massacring Jews on the
Speaker 1: Eastern Front, and this is killing our reputation and abroad,
Speaker 1: and so I go. So I asked the Furor, I said,
Speaker 1: is this our official policy, that we're just now going
Speaker 1: to annihilate and exterminate Jews? And he said the Feur
Speaker 1: told me that this is not our policy and this
Speaker 1: will never be our policy. So are you sure this
Speaker 1: is coming from from you know, from Hitler and Hydrick.
Speaker 1: You can look it up. It's in the transcript. Famously
Speaker 1: says that's his public position and that will always have
Speaker 1: to be his public position, if you understand my double
Speaker 1: meaning wink wink. In other words, he's lying. He's lying
Speaker 1: to you. The lie he's giving to you is the
Speaker 1: lie he's telling the world. That's his public position, and
Speaker 1: that's the public position that it always will have to
Speaker 1: be like in other words, you get it. So he's
Speaker 1: not gonna say that's our official position. He's never gonna
Speaker 1: say that's our official position. But I'm here to tell
Speaker 1: you on his behalf, this is what the Furer wants.
Speaker 1: Now we're gonna do what the Furor wants. So don't grumble,
Speaker 1: don't complain, don't tell me. We can't tell me. How
Speaker 1: are we going to do this? Now, that is where
Speaker 1: the Holocaust was really masterminded. And this is as close
Speaker 1: as historians have ever gotten. Clearly hit their masterminded it,
Speaker 1: there's no doubt about it. But that's as close of
Speaker 1: if you want, a kind of a smoking gun. But
Speaker 1: even then, nothing was ever written on paper. Now, I
Speaker 1: just want to understand this. We're talking about a totalitarian,
Speaker 1: one party regime. Remember it was gonna be a thousand
Speaker 1: year Reich who's gonna last for a thousand years. And
Speaker 1: they still said, no, you don't put something like this
Speaker 1: down on paper. You're an absolute moron. If you do,
Speaker 1: it could fall in the wrong hands, it could be leaked.
Speaker 1: I don't know, we may lose the war. So what
Speaker 1: I'm saying is to be that stupid. That to me
Speaker 1: is what's staggering, and that arrogant to put down on
Speaker 1: paper your actual plot and conspiracy to frame Trump as
Speaker 1: an agent of Russia. I'm telling you, Brannan's not too bright.
Speaker 1: Clapper's not too bright, call Me's not too bright. Obama's
Speaker 1: not too bright. Well, Joey, Joe Biden, we all know
Speaker 1: about that. I mean, really, this is like, you know,
Speaker 1: it's not the Three Stooges, it's like the ten Stooges. Like,
Speaker 1: these people are stupid, and their stupidity now is what's
Speaker 1: going to Their arrogance is what's going to bring them down.
Speaker 1: And they've only got one thing left. They've got one
Speaker 1: thing left, the pure complicity of the media. The only
Speaker 1: thing that is keeping Obama now standing is that CBS News,
Speaker 1: ABC News, NBC News. This is CNN, MSNBC. They either
Speaker 1: are not carrying this story, reporting on it whatsoever, or
Speaker 1: they're deliberately poo pooing it. These are crazy conspiracy theories.
Speaker 1: What the hell? This is bizarre on the part of
Speaker 1: Tulsi Gabbard. So I just to show you how bad
Speaker 1: it is. One quick cut, as Tulci Gabbard is doing
Speaker 1: her press conference yesterday, and she begins to outline the
Speaker 1: links that the Obama administration went to a the blow
Speaker 1: by blow to manufacture the Russia collusion hoax and to
Speaker 1: frame Trump. The anchor then says, pull away, pull away.
Speaker 1: CNN deliberately cuts away and ends its coverage, ends its coverage.
Speaker 1: Say no, no, we don't want, we don't want you
Speaker 1: to see this now, you can't, God forbid, you should
Speaker 1: see this. Listen now, this is CNN cutting away right
Speaker 1: at the moment that Tulsi Gabbert outlines exactly how, where,
Speaker 1: and when Obama ordered the Russia collusion hoax Roll cut six, Mike.
Speaker 4: Multiple intelligence community assessments released in the months leading up
Speaker 4: to the November twenty sixteen election concluded that Russia had
Speaker 4: neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of
Speaker 4: the US election.
Speaker 8: On December, Nick, we've been listening there to the Director
Speaker 8: of National Intelligence, Tulca Gabbard, continuing on what has now
Speaker 8: been a multi day effort not only with public statements
Speaker 8: like this, but release of documents to attempt to back
Speaker 8: up the quite extreme allegation that President Obama is guilty
Speaker 8: of treason and that he worked in some sort of
Speaker 8: conspiracy with Hillary Clinton, etc. In the assessment by the
Speaker 8: intelligence community at the time that Russia interfered in the
Speaker 8: twenty sixteen election.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable. Now she's at December fifth. He couldn't wait till
Speaker 1: December ninth, because December ninth, twenty sixteen, is that infamous meeting.
Speaker 1: And she's now going She's starting to get there. I like, wholla, okay,
Speaker 1: now pull away, now, pull away. He's are extreme allegations. Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Speaker 1: That's the only thing keeping them up. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: Truth is truth is truth, and Tulca Gabbard Haw's the
Speaker 1: receipts Keith in the Great state of Ohio. Thanks for
Speaker 1: holding Keith, and welcome.
Speaker 7: Good morning, Jeff Hi. I can'd to hear you again today.
Speaker 7: I moved from Massachusetts last year. I'm glad I'm out
Speaker 7: of a liberal land, that's for sure. I just wanted
Speaker 7: to say that, don't worry. Trump has his team. Don't
Speaker 7: worry about Cash and Bongino and Bondy. They cannot do
Speaker 7: anything until they clean out these traders. Watch the news
Speaker 7: every single day. They get somebody and who pops up
Speaker 7: Judge Boseburg, what are they gonna do when they get
Speaker 7: Obama or Hillary or Brannan or any of these people
Speaker 7: put him in front of a judge like that. No,
Speaker 7: those judges will be removed after we win the mid terms.
Speaker 7: But until then, it's gonna be exactly what you are,
Speaker 7: an educator. He is educating the whole country on what
Speaker 7: has been going on. We are aware of it, you
Speaker 7: know us to listen to you and in your audience,
Speaker 7: but the rest of the country isn't. And they are
Speaker 7: learning a little bit at a time. If they don't
Speaker 7: watch CNN, they learn a little faster, but just constant,
Speaker 7: again and again and again. This is the information that's
Speaker 7: coming out to educate everyone. The exposure of the crimes,
Speaker 7: the accountability will be coming. People will go to jail.
Speaker 7: Some of them might not make it. They might take
Speaker 7: the easy way out. We don't know, and you never know.
Speaker 7: They might just leave the country and go back to
Speaker 7: their country of origin where they came from. I don't know.
Speaker 7: I don't know everything. I'm just saying there's a lot
Speaker 7: of things out there, and I believe that everything is
Speaker 7: going to be okay because in the end, God wins,
Speaker 7: It's going to be all right.
Speaker 1: Oh you know the hand of God. Agree with you, Keith,
Speaker 1: That's always to me the big wild card. You can
Speaker 1: never ever predict the hand of God. And I believe
Speaker 1: it was the hand of God that saved Trump.
Speaker 7: I do.
Speaker 1: I believe it was the hand of God that put
Speaker 1: him back in the White House for a second term.
Speaker 1: And I got to tell you this, so far, what's
Speaker 1: being revealed, that's the hand of God. I mean again,
Speaker 1: I know we knew this, but these are this is
Speaker 1: this is rare that you get smoking gun documents like this.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is again, not that I don't want
Speaker 1: to keep overbeating this analogy to death, but this is
Speaker 1: you know, it's like I see the lipstick on his collar.
Speaker 1: I smell perfume on him. I'm going through his phone.
Speaker 1: Who is this woman that he's constantly texting with? He's
Speaker 1: coming home late. Friends and family have told me he
Speaker 1: keeps seeing this. You know, he's with this blonde over
Speaker 1: and over again. You know, Okay, it's pretty obvious he's
Speaker 1: having an affair. But this is here's a picture of
Speaker 1: your husband naked in bed with his mistress. Here it is,
Speaker 1: That's what we have now, It's irrefutable. It's beyond the
Speaker 1: shadow of a doubt. That's what Tulca Gabbart is now delivered.
Speaker 1: And notice Obama didn't open his big mouth again yesterday.
Speaker 1: Do you notice when she did the first document dumpmember
Speaker 1: his office at all? This is bizarre week, outrageous. She said, really, okay, well,
Speaker 1: I was going to be a second document dump after yesterday.
Speaker 1: He's got nothing left to say because there's nothing to say.
Speaker 1: He's guiltiest in uh Keith, Thank you very much for
Speaker 1: that call, Natalie in Lunenburg. Thanks for holding Natalie.
Speaker 5: And welcome, hey, Jeff.
Speaker 2: In light of what you just said there, it might
Speaker 2: seem as though truth and Justice has the whip in
Speaker 2: their hands, but I'm pessimistic. I think it's still a
Speaker 2: David and Goliath situation. I have a couple of questions
Speaker 2: for you. So recently the Supreme Court ruled in favor
Speaker 2: of Donald Trump and presidential immunity. Don't you think Obama's
Speaker 2: going to utilize that or is there a difference here?
Speaker 1: Well, I think there's a big difference because the immunity
Speaker 1: is for your core functions as president of the United States.
Speaker 1: What Obama did, how is this a core function of
Speaker 1: his duty to frame your opponent or sorry, to frame
Speaker 1: the incoming president as an agent of Russia, and that
Speaker 1: you knowingly lied and essentially ordered a coup to overthrow him. Like,
Speaker 1: how does that fall under the purview of president of
Speaker 1: the United States? You see? To me, I would read
Speaker 1: it like this, and you may disagree with me, Natalie,
Speaker 1: But for example, when Obama ordered that drone strike that
Speaker 1: took out a lakee and war Alacke, who was a
Speaker 1: US citizen, Well, I think the Supreme Court would say no,
Speaker 1: that would fall under presidential immunity. He believed he was
Speaker 1: a terrorist, he believed he was a threat. He ordered
Speaker 1: a run strike, there was no due process or anything
Speaker 1: like that, and you know he killed them. Well, you
Speaker 1: can't prosecute him for that because that fell under his
Speaker 1: duty as a president. But how does this fall under
Speaker 1: the duty as president of the United States to order
Speaker 1: your intelligence community to literally lie and claim that Trump
Speaker 1: helped that Putin helped Trump, and that Trump colluded with
Speaker 1: Putin when your own intelligence community clearly told you that
Speaker 1: wasn't the case. So it would be very hard for
Speaker 1: Obama to argue that. Natalie, There's more I want to
Speaker 1: talk to you about. If you can just hang on.
Speaker 1: I'm up against a heartbreak