WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, like the Gnostics or whatever. I just call

2
00:00:03.640 --> 00:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>him crazy. So you're you're you're a goober. You're an idiot,

3
00:00:08.359 --> 00:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a goofball. That's about it. Jooshah Fat Julian Canadian two dollars.

4
00:00:18.760 --> 00:00:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Sam Shamun apologized, okay on about what I mean. Josiah

5
00:00:24.879 --> 00:00:28.079
<v Speaker 1>A leron twenty dollars, God bless you. The Calvioc turned

6
00:00:28.199 --> 00:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox because of you and your examples. Santos humane is

7
00:00:32.200 --> 00:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars. Sam apologized about five minutes ago. Okay, I mean,

8
00:00:38.079 --> 00:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>if we want to be on good terms, I'm open

9
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to that. I hope this doesn't divide people. We all

10
00:00:45.960 --> 00:00:52.039
<v Speaker 1>keep walking. Respect everything that you do. CAUCUSUS two pounds

11
00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>or two euros. I never thought Sam would do this.

12
00:00:54.920 --> 00:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Lord of Mercy MKG Canadian five dollars and forget. I'm

13
00:00:58.280 --> 00:01:03.119
<v Speaker 1>all for forgiveness, but what is a bipolar apology worth?

14
00:01:03.200 --> 00:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Sam needs help? Well, I mean I'm fine with I

15
00:01:10.319 --> 00:01:12.799
<v Speaker 1>have to think about what would be the wisest course here.

16
00:01:13.079 --> 00:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So Joey says we're two dollars. We need Jay on

17
00:01:17.879 --> 00:01:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the Whatever podcast? Now guess what? So I did talk

18
00:01:20.200 --> 00:01:24.079
<v Speaker 1>to Brian today from Whatever, it looks like what we're

19
00:01:24.120 --> 00:01:26.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna do is We're gonna have a debate on whatever

20
00:01:30.079 --> 00:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in about a month, and I think I'm going to

21
00:01:32.760 --> 00:01:37.519
<v Speaker 1>debate not so Aerdite that debated Jim Bob and Jake Rattlesnake.

22
00:01:39.079 --> 00:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>There's also going to be a debate about the CI's

23
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>relationship to ISIS and al Qaeda that I'll be debating

24
00:01:50.879 --> 00:01:54.079
<v Speaker 1>a post a profit. But it looks like that'll have

25
00:01:54.159 --> 00:01:56.319
<v Speaker 1>to be June because the first time we can do

26
00:01:56.439 --> 00:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it him and me is like June. So I think

27
00:01:58.879 --> 00:02:02.159
<v Speaker 1>in June we're going to try to do that, and

28
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>then I'll be going on to perhaps other large podcasts

29
00:02:05.719 --> 00:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on the West Coast in the next month. So we're

30
00:02:09.280 --> 00:02:12.159
<v Speaker 1>trying to make that happen. Tain't nothing ten dollars. Did

31
00:02:12.199 --> 00:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you see Dave Smith versus Doug Murray on Joe Rogan

32
00:02:16.319 --> 00:02:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Israel debate. I was actually gonna play this tomorrow, so

33
00:02:19.280 --> 00:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you see that Rogan. I've got like fifty clips for

34
00:02:22.599 --> 00:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's stream that I thought would be funny to watch.

35
00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:26.599
<v Speaker 1>It was just going to be a chill string. Murray's

36
00:02:26.680 --> 00:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>entire argument was an appeal to thirty. He said, if

37
00:02:29.159 --> 00:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>you've not been to Israel, you can't speak that's what.

38
00:02:34.680 --> 00:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what not so Aerdite's debate partner was saying in

39
00:02:39.120 --> 00:02:44.159
<v Speaker 1>their debate right which they were debating patriarchy and feminism

40
00:02:44.360 --> 00:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and all that guy, All that guy I wanted to

41
00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>say is that you can't talk about Israel. Haven't been there, Like,

42
00:02:48.520 --> 00:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what does that have to do with patriarchy. Let's talk God.

43
00:02:52.080 --> 00:02:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Ten dollars. Dick Toddus, Pope number nine. All the princes

44
00:02:55.759 --> 00:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of the world shall kiss the feet of the Pope

45
00:02:58.000 --> 00:02:59.759
<v Speaker 1>number ten. His name alone will be spoken in the

46
00:02:59.800 --> 00:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>church is number eleven. This is the only name in

47
00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the world. Greg was going crazy. Oh I'm a pope, Gregory. Yes,

48
00:03:06.479 --> 00:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So again, if you're not aware of this, here is

49
00:03:10.120 --> 00:03:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Dick Tatus, Pope number nine. All the princes of the

50
00:03:23.800 --> 00:03:25.599
<v Speaker 1>world will kiss the feet of the Pope number ten.

51
00:03:26.039 --> 00:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>His name alone is that which can be spoken in

52
00:03:27.960 --> 00:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the churches, number eleven. It's the only name in the world.

53
00:03:40.520 --> 00:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>There is that. So we got a bunch of super

54
00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:47.159
<v Speaker 1>chats here. I'm trying to get through these, and then

55
00:03:47.199 --> 00:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll go to refuting allbrecks, low tier paper stuff, MKG

56
00:03:52.840 --> 00:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>two dollars. That's why anti Muslim conversions are suspicious no

57
00:03:57.280 --> 00:04:02.479
<v Speaker 1>head to quest two dollars. The latest community post is apology.

58
00:04:02.560 --> 00:04:06.039
<v Speaker 1>He says that you started if you're not innocent. Okay,

59
00:04:07.319 --> 00:04:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sorry that he took it as a feud,

60
00:04:10.479 --> 00:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like for me to DM him. Okay, I didn't know

61
00:04:13.319 --> 00:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that causes him to be so mad. Okay. Most people,

62
00:04:19.639 --> 00:04:22.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, they might be tempted to look at their

63
00:04:22.199 --> 00:04:24.439
<v Speaker 1>phone if they're on an interview and their board or something,

64
00:04:24.439 --> 00:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But most people like I, I've not looked at my

65
00:04:26.680 --> 00:04:29.959
<v Speaker 1>phone this entire live stream. So how am I supposed

66
00:04:29.959 --> 00:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to know that it triggers him when somebody messages him

67
00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>on him on his phone? Quest outset Eddie five bucks

68
00:04:41.199 --> 00:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>or all worldviews circular? You said it before in debates.

69
00:04:46.519 --> 00:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe because people hear the word circular and

70
00:04:49.279 --> 00:04:51.879
<v Speaker 1>they think of the fallacy of circularity, it might be better,

71
00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:56.439
<v Speaker 1>as FDA says, to refer to it as recursive or

72
00:04:56.480 --> 00:05:01.199
<v Speaker 1>self referencing. Gilbert Valenzuela five dollars. My family and are

73
00:05:01.240 --> 00:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>being baptized a Saturday. The Orthodox Church says, probab, your

74
00:05:03.279 --> 00:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>hard work played a big part in my conversion from

75
00:05:06.160 --> 00:05:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Catholic Church. Hey man, I appreciate that that's

76
00:05:08.319 --> 00:05:10.759
<v Speaker 1>great to hear. Bad ghosts Face five dollars. For what

77
00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:12.399
<v Speaker 1>it's worth, Sam is taking out his post and he

78
00:05:12.439 --> 00:05:18.759
<v Speaker 1>posted apology. All right, So Sam called you a coward,

79
00:05:18.800 --> 00:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he didn't apologize, okay, I mean, I don't know what

80
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>san Diego Sanchez five dollars, Sam the paranormal, paranoral ORB

81
00:05:34.199 --> 00:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>guy won't go Orb Novus Orbo Forever Notorious Knives five dollars.

82
00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Look at Sam's latest YouTube post, Bad ghost Face two dollars.

83
00:05:44.920 --> 00:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Never mind Sid two dollars. It's called samifesting. I condom

84
00:05:50.560 --> 00:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Matt three dollars. Solo Orbo Skima Bear five dollars. Hello,

85
00:05:54.959 --> 00:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>orb theory a colcavayable five dollars, should debate orthodox musclem Now,

86
00:05:59.000 --> 00:06:02.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody asked me about this today, and I'm not familiar

87
00:06:02.519 --> 00:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>with who he is. He's calling you out on TikTok

88
00:06:07.240 --> 00:06:13.959
<v Speaker 1>and has seventy thousand TikTok followers. I tried to build

89
00:06:14.000 --> 00:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>up my TikTok, but it's difficult. So I wonder if

90
00:06:19.160 --> 00:06:21.079
<v Speaker 1>he has does he have like a YouTube or something,

91
00:06:21.120 --> 00:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we maybe we can set it up

92
00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>outside of TikTok. It's just a hassle to try to

93
00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>do stuff like that on TikTok, So does he have

94
00:06:29.959 --> 00:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter that'd be easier for me outset Eddy two dollars.

95
00:06:35.000 --> 00:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you go to the bathroom with carnivore die

96
00:06:37.040 --> 00:06:39.399
<v Speaker 1>without fiber? You don't actually need fiber, by the way,

97
00:06:39.439 --> 00:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>if you drink coffee, that works well at annual five dollars.

98
00:06:43.959 --> 00:06:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I tried to listening for Bible explanations, but I stopped

99
00:06:46.959 --> 00:06:50.439
<v Speaker 1>because it's impossible to follow the topic when he stops

100
00:06:50.480 --> 00:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to bash somebody every two minutes. As funny as that

101
00:06:53.040 --> 00:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can be, but it's our five dollars. He's calling Jay

102
00:06:56.639 --> 00:06:59.439
<v Speaker 1>out for a debate. Now, I look, just forget it man,

103
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>one shot a seventeen twenty dollars what you said about

104
00:07:05.040 --> 00:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Internet apologists not being qualified to teach theology. If you

105
00:07:07.920 --> 00:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>look at David Wood's recent debate with Alex, this came

106
00:07:10.240 --> 00:07:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to mind. There were a few months that we had

107
00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a team up where we had a Jay Dyer up there,

108
00:07:17.720 --> 00:07:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and Alex would have gotten eviscerated. Yeah. I mean I've

109
00:07:20.639 --> 00:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>messaged at Alex O'Connor for a long time to try

110
00:07:24.279 --> 00:07:30.639
<v Speaker 1>to debate, so it just gets ignored. Chris Crimson Specter

111
00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>two dollars. Cat hairs are now meauricles. That's a good

112
00:07:37.680 --> 00:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>one as ghost. Two dollars, Jay, will you debate Harlot's

113
00:07:41.240 --> 00:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on the whatever? Well, the way that show works is

114
00:07:44.759 --> 00:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>typically you debate anybody. I guess, but I'm gonna mainly

115
00:07:47.920 --> 00:07:50.399
<v Speaker 1>be debating not so aradit, but I'm sure I'll also

116
00:07:50.439 --> 00:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>be debating the other people in there. Jbpelty a two dollars,

117
00:07:56.600 --> 00:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Sam is going live in a few Okay, I mean

118
00:07:59.720 --> 00:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like I've laid out my critiques. So there

119
00:08:06.600 --> 00:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you go, dank naked five dollars. What is it? We're

120
00:08:09.680 --> 00:08:11.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to the papsy stuff in a second. What

121
00:08:12.120 --> 00:08:14.879
<v Speaker 1>is a good starting point to learn about Orthodox position?

122
00:08:16.319 --> 00:08:19.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a Catholic. I want to learn more. Pamazansky's

123
00:08:19.560 --> 00:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>book is a great uh kanachisis text Orthodox Dogmatics by Palmazansky,

124
00:08:27.079 --> 00:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So I would start there and then maybe moved to

125
00:08:28.800 --> 00:08:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Lasky's Mystical Theology Eastern Church. Jay Rock seven to eleven.

126
00:08:32.279 --> 00:08:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Who is Jeff Daherty?

127
00:08:34.679 --> 00:08:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

128
00:08:34.799 --> 00:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, he was some sort of evangelical ish pastor who

129
00:08:37.600 --> 00:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>then became a neo pagan and he debated Andrew So

130
00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I haven't kept up with that guy. Accounts payable two dollars.

131
00:08:46.639 --> 00:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe that Aposse Prophet is genuine in

132
00:08:49.159 --> 00:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>his conversion. You know time, I think will tell Joe

133
00:08:55.600 --> 00:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. Sam didn't really apologize. He has a community

134
00:08:58.360 --> 00:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>post's apology for his audience. It says that you demonized him.

135
00:09:04.720 --> 00:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where what's where's the demonizing? Where's the anything?

136
00:09:08.759 --> 00:09:12.399
<v Speaker 1>All I did was ask him to debate, and you've

137
00:09:12.440 --> 00:09:20.879
<v Speaker 1>got like meltdown. He doesn't have any evidence of me

138
00:09:20.919 --> 00:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>ever saying anything negative to him or bad about him

139
00:09:23.679 --> 00:09:29.639
<v Speaker 1>or anything. I've literally always been respectful to him, and

140
00:09:32.440 --> 00:09:36.639
<v Speaker 1>even after the drama when I asked him, when I

141
00:09:36.679 --> 00:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>asked him to come and set up something where we

142
00:09:40.440 --> 00:09:42.919
<v Speaker 1>can have time responses. This is what I got.

143
00:09:45.600 --> 00:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna call you out. We're gonna get you. Don't

144
00:09:47.480 --> 00:09:50.600
<v Speaker 3>worry about it now, girl, get.

145
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:51.279
<v Speaker 4>Some more energies.

146
00:09:51.360 --> 00:10:04.639
<v Speaker 5>Maybe I'll help you. Like I said, thanks, I'm going

147
00:10:04.679 --> 00:10:06.000
<v Speaker 5>to show them more round from way.

148
00:10:06.840 --> 00:10:08.639
<v Speaker 6>Down Jo David.

149
00:10:12.080 --> 00:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Like he's referring to my jokes about James White that

150
00:10:16.840 --> 00:10:24.879
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense. But account's payable two dollars. He

151
00:10:24.919 --> 00:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>has a YouTube channel called or Orthodox Muslim outset Eddie

152
00:10:30.159 --> 00:10:33.159
<v Speaker 1>two dollars Jay, Do you say pop or soda? Nobody

153
00:10:33.159 --> 00:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>from Tennessee says pop. That's a Yankee thing. Let's see,

154
00:10:42.279 --> 00:10:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to keep up with all the super I

155
00:10:43.799 --> 00:10:45.519
<v Speaker 1>think I've gotten. Let me see, there's probably some more

156
00:10:45.519 --> 00:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>super jets over here. Let's see we got two new members.

157
00:10:54.759 --> 00:10:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to the members with the members content is

158
00:10:58.039 --> 00:11:01.879
<v Speaker 1>linked and I added a couple of things to the

159
00:11:01.919 --> 00:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>members content too, by the way, pretty recently. All right,

160
00:11:17.120 --> 00:11:19.279
<v Speaker 1>so let's get to this in this one.

161
00:11:19.320 --> 00:11:21.799
<v Speaker 4>This is a fun topic. You know, we covered the

162
00:11:21.799 --> 00:11:24.559
<v Speaker 4>americ of the conception. Another one that often comes up

163
00:11:25.120 --> 00:11:30.639
<v Speaker 4>with Protestant circles and Orthodox circles especially is the papacy.

164
00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:33.600
<v Speaker 4>So I wanted to talk about that now. In the

165
00:11:33.720 --> 00:11:38.159
<v Speaker 4>last video you mentioned that for you, though there are

166
00:11:38.279 --> 00:11:43.320
<v Speaker 4>other factors that came in to your conversion from Protestantism

167
00:11:43.320 --> 00:11:48.120
<v Speaker 4>to Catholicism, the papacy was a big one. Tell me why.

168
00:11:48.840 --> 00:11:53.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, it really played a very big role, number

169
00:11:53.279 --> 00:11:58.960
<v Speaker 6>one when I converted from Protestantism. But of course that's

170
00:11:59.000 --> 00:12:03.159
<v Speaker 6>like considered that way Orthodox and Cathos then of course

171
00:12:03.159 --> 00:12:06.159
<v Speaker 6>it becomes a whole different angle where you look at

172
00:12:06.799 --> 00:12:10.519
<v Speaker 6>evidence for the papacy, and I began to look at

173
00:12:11.000 --> 00:12:14.360
<v Speaker 6>the history of the papacy throughout the early Church, Pope

174
00:12:14.399 --> 00:12:17.240
<v Speaker 6>Saint Clement of Rome very early on, and on and on,

175
00:12:17.360 --> 00:12:20.200
<v Speaker 6>leading all the way up to and beyond Pope Saint

176
00:12:20.240 --> 00:12:24.600
<v Speaker 6>Leo the Great, and I became ever more convinced of

177
00:12:24.639 --> 00:12:29.039
<v Speaker 6>the incredible role of the pope throughout history. Now, of course,

178
00:12:29.080 --> 00:12:30.919
<v Speaker 6>I may be get too far ahead of myself before that.

179
00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:34.399
<v Speaker 6>Of course, as we know very well, the clear foundation

180
00:12:34.480 --> 00:12:37.919
<v Speaker 6>of the papacy is the Scripture. It truly is, so

181
00:12:38.840 --> 00:12:42.440
<v Speaker 6>that laid the groundwork for me. Scripture of course.

182
00:12:44.159 --> 00:12:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, the first out here that I would say is

183
00:12:45.879 --> 00:12:48.519
<v Speaker 1>that I went through all this same stuff too, right,

184
00:12:48.559 --> 00:12:52.799
<v Speaker 1>So I had the same ideology as a Protestant who

185
00:12:52.919 --> 00:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>started reading The Catholic Apologist in two thousand and one.

186
00:12:57.320 --> 00:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I went heavy into it. I read tons and tons

187
00:13:00.399 --> 00:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the secondary literature, and then I decided I to

188
00:13:03.639 --> 00:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>have to get the church Father's set right. So you

189
00:13:05.639 --> 00:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>see that set piece that's behind Lofton there where the

190
00:13:09.320 --> 00:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>untouched church Fathers are basically immaculate because he hasn't actually

191
00:13:13.600 --> 00:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>read them. I actually started reading them a lot, and

192
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>I was fortunate enough to have a job where I

193
00:13:20.720 --> 00:13:23.159
<v Speaker 1>could read the Church Fathers for about ten years straight.

194
00:13:24.240 --> 00:13:26.639
<v Speaker 1>So this put me in a position that a lot

195
00:13:26.679 --> 00:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of people don't have. I was also doing university at

196
00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the same time, and I had a very easy job

197
00:13:32.039 --> 00:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for about ten years in my twenties, and so that

198
00:13:35.360 --> 00:13:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Philip schaff Church Father's set was a lot of my

199
00:13:38.879 --> 00:13:43.399
<v Speaker 1>time at work. And I initially had a similar situation,

200
00:13:43.519 --> 00:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>probably to Albrech, where I thought, Okay, it's either Roman

201
00:13:47.320 --> 00:13:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Catholic or it's Protestant, right, that's what it's got to be, right,

202
00:13:50.679 --> 00:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And there weren't a whole lot of internet options back

203
00:13:55.320 --> 00:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in about two thousand and one two three where you

204
00:13:58.039 --> 00:14:01.159
<v Speaker 1>could look into, you know, like the Orthodox sphere or

205
00:14:01.159 --> 00:14:05.159
<v Speaker 1>something like that. What you guys have today didn't exist

206
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and three. And probably maybe Albrecht was

207
00:14:08.600 --> 00:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>getting into this kind of stuff back then as well.

208
00:14:10.799 --> 00:14:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what year he converted, but it might

209
00:14:13.919 --> 00:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have been around the same time as my interest in

210
00:14:17.279 --> 00:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>church history and the Church Fathers and the question of

211
00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the canon, you know, back in early two thousands. But

212
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that it's very much it's a thing

213
00:14:27.639 --> 00:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that's based on a lot of assumptions, and there's a

214
00:14:30.879 --> 00:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of to use the Loftonian term, there's a lot

215
00:14:37.759 --> 00:14:43.159
<v Speaker 1>of nuance and context that Roman Catholics leave out of

216
00:14:43.200 --> 00:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>their favorite quote minds. And when I first encountered the

217
00:14:48.320 --> 00:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>quote minds through you know Butler and Daalgren and Hess's book,

218
00:14:53.159 --> 00:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Ray's work or Scott Hans books. I have all those.

219
00:14:56.679 --> 00:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I read all those guys. I was reading all that

220
00:14:59.200 --> 00:15:02.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the early two t thousands, right, Jerrymattitics is stuff.

221
00:15:02.639 --> 00:15:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I got to be personal friends with Jerrymattics. So I

222
00:15:06.360 --> 00:15:10.519
<v Speaker 1>went from Bonson World to Roman Catholic Thomas World in

223
00:15:10.519 --> 00:15:12.759
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one two three. That's when I was

224
00:15:12.799 --> 00:15:15.879
<v Speaker 1>really reading and converted. I was already believing the Roman

225
00:15:15.919 --> 00:15:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Catholic stuff in two thousand and one, but I didn't

226
00:15:18.799 --> 00:15:21.879
<v Speaker 1>have the I wasn't convinced enough to convert yet. So

227
00:15:21.919 --> 00:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it took me till about two thousand and three before

228
00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I converted. And by the way, I took the name Augustine,

229
00:15:25.240 --> 00:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>which is funny. When I was received in the Kelly Church,

230
00:15:28.240 --> 00:15:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, I've been there, done that. I

231
00:15:31.799 --> 00:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>know this whole process. I know the thinking, but what

232
00:15:37.559 --> 00:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>happens is that you're tempted, I think, to make the

233
00:15:42.159 --> 00:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>decision on bad reasons. In other words, you're when you

234
00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>get deeper and deeper into these papal things and you're

235
00:15:50.639 --> 00:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>reading the objections and this and that. I remember one

236
00:15:53.480 --> 00:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>time in my twenties there was even like a week

237
00:15:55.879 --> 00:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>where I remember vividly, just non stop reading every day

238
00:16:01.759 --> 00:16:05.639
<v Speaker 1>for a week about the papacy stuff, and I could

239
00:16:05.679 --> 00:16:08.759
<v Speaker 1>not decide. I was reading William Webster's book, his trilogy

240
00:16:08.799 --> 00:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. It's all these Protestant you know, quote minds

241
00:16:12.519 --> 00:16:16.399
<v Speaker 1>against the papacy. I was reading all these papal apologetics,

242
00:16:17.000 --> 00:16:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and I felt like, you know, at a certain point,

243
00:16:18.799 --> 00:16:21.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna go with papacy because it just seems

244
00:16:21.679 --> 00:16:24.519
<v Speaker 1>like things like the canon, things like you know this,

245
00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that it just doesn't work in the Protestant world. But

246
00:16:27.720 --> 00:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens to people who are new to the world

247
00:16:30.039 --> 00:16:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of Rome, which was me back then, is that you're

248
00:16:32.720 --> 00:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>not yet acquainted with the masses of papal documents and

249
00:16:37.399 --> 00:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>texts that you will have to read. Right. So, just

250
00:16:40.399 --> 00:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like we see with like the Hadiths, it's not just

251
00:16:43.840 --> 00:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bible and the ex cathedral statements or the Bible

252
00:16:46.960 --> 00:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know the Catechism of Trands or the Bible

253
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and Denzinger, right, I mean they don't even read Denzinger

254
00:16:52.600 --> 00:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>like I know Denzinger like the back of my hand.

255
00:16:54.159 --> 00:16:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I could. I could demolish these guys going through Denzinger.

256
00:16:57.240 --> 00:17:01.759
<v Speaker 1>But you don't know that yet, right. You think it's

257
00:17:02.480 --> 00:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>just this Protestant or Catholic choice. And then when you

258
00:17:05.200 --> 00:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>go into the world of Rome, you're confronted with an

259
00:17:08.480 --> 00:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>entirely new set of problems. Now you have to understand

260
00:17:13.039 --> 00:17:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the post pre and post Vatican Two teachings. And this

261
00:17:18.640 --> 00:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>confronts every Roman Catholic at a very fundamental parish level,

262
00:17:22.680 --> 00:17:28.079
<v Speaker 1>because many Roman Catholic parishes are pretty much Protestantized. You see,

263
00:17:28.519 --> 00:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they have guitar masses, they have women that hand out

264
00:17:31.400 --> 00:17:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the Eucharist, they have clown masses, they have all the

265
00:17:35.119 --> 00:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>most insane, wild liturgical abuses that you could think of.

266
00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 1>And then what happens is you try to make sense

267
00:17:42.079 --> 00:17:44.519
<v Speaker 1>of this. You try to say, well, I don't have

268
00:17:44.599 --> 00:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to I know already the cope, the wave of cope

269
00:17:51.279 --> 00:17:54.039
<v Speaker 1>that you will go through. You will begin by saying

270
00:17:54.160 --> 00:17:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to accept all of the Vatican two stuff.

271
00:17:56.839 --> 00:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I can read it and interpret it in a conservative way,

272
00:18:00.279 --> 00:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>but then you haven't really been presented with reading the

273
00:18:02.400 --> 00:18:08.039
<v Speaker 1>pre Vatican two encyclicals like Lamentabiley, Patchindi, Dominici Gracias, like

274
00:18:08.960 --> 00:18:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Humanum Janus, like Mauri Voss, like Quanticura, like Mesticiko Porus,

275
00:18:15.240 --> 00:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like southeiast Cognitium. I can keep going. You don't know

276
00:18:18.000 --> 00:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>those things yet. You haven't read the pre Vatican two

277
00:18:20.240 --> 00:18:25.519
<v Speaker 1>papal doctrines extensively. Well, I started doing that right. I

278
00:18:25.559 --> 00:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>realized if I was going to understand Catholicism, I'd have

279
00:18:27.960 --> 00:18:31.599
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Rock of Peter and his great

280
00:18:31.640 --> 00:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>successors in the last three centuries and their vast array

281
00:18:35.440 --> 00:18:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of papal and cyclicals. So guess what I did. I

282
00:18:37.359 --> 00:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>read them all. I read thousands of pages of papal

283
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:42.519
<v Speaker 1>and cyclicals. I read all of the of the thirteenths

284
00:18:42.519 --> 00:18:46.079
<v Speaker 1>and cyclicals. I read all the important Pisce to tenth

285
00:18:46.119 --> 00:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and cyclicals. I read multiple maybe not all of them

286
00:18:49.640 --> 00:18:52.519
<v Speaker 1>because they're not all translated into English. But I've read

287
00:18:52.519 --> 00:18:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Pias to twelfth extensively. I've read Piss the eleventh extensively,

288
00:18:56.920 --> 00:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and I've even gone back into the Butler the Alberigo

289
00:19:04.119 --> 00:19:07.759
<v Speaker 1>two volume set that the Jesuits put out some decades ago.

290
00:19:07.799 --> 00:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like a two hundred dollars set of the Ecumenical

291
00:19:10.720 --> 00:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Council's original translations from the Jesuit scholars and Tanner and ALBERTA. Goo,

292
00:19:20.200 --> 00:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, is it? And so I started reading the

293
00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>actually the Ecumenical Councils from the Roman Catholic vantage point, right,

294
00:19:25.400 --> 00:19:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a very rare, unknown set. It's a two volume set.

295
00:19:29.319 --> 00:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So I immersed myself in all this world. On top

296
00:19:32.920 --> 00:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the source documents, as well as getting Denzinger and

297
00:19:35.920 --> 00:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>reading it entirely all the way through, as well as

298
00:19:38.119 --> 00:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>having the Catechism of Trent as well as having the

299
00:19:40.039 --> 00:19:47.839
<v Speaker 1>documents Attican two. I also got the secondary literature. That

300
00:19:48.000 --> 00:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>means I went through all of the traditional Catholic apologies.

301
00:19:51.960 --> 00:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens for a lot of people who

302
00:19:54.119 --> 00:19:56.640
<v Speaker 1>go into this world, who get to this stage is

303
00:19:56.680 --> 00:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you begin to confront do you want to be a

304
00:19:58.720 --> 00:20:01.799
<v Speaker 1>trad cat or you're going to defend the novasorto. Each

305
00:20:01.839 --> 00:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of them has their respective challenges. I went the route

306
00:20:04.640 --> 00:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of trad cat. I went to the SSPX, I attended

307
00:20:06.720 --> 00:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Latin Mass for around eight to ten years,

308
00:20:09.480 --> 00:20:13.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe nine years technically eight or nine years, and I

309
00:20:13.319 --> 00:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was in that world very seriously, very intently. I even

310
00:20:17.799 --> 00:20:21.839
<v Speaker 1>met with a guy about going into monastical life back

311
00:20:21.880 --> 00:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in my twenties, so I was serious enough that I

312
00:20:24.880 --> 00:20:28.039
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to think about monastic life. However, the thing

313
00:20:28.079 --> 00:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that turned me off from monastic life was when I

314
00:20:29.920 --> 00:20:35.799
<v Speaker 1>went to the diocese spiritual director for that. He was skittles,

315
00:20:36.119 --> 00:20:39.039
<v Speaker 1>like flaming Skittles, and then I read that most of

316
00:20:39.079 --> 00:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the Dominicans in the Roman Catholic world are flaming Skittles.

317
00:20:42.799 --> 00:20:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye, I'm out. I'm so glad I never went

318
00:20:45.880 --> 00:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that route. But the problem is that if you go

319
00:20:48.279 --> 00:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this route, this delusion that these people are into, this

320
00:20:51.000 --> 00:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is what you're going to have to choose between. Do

321
00:20:52.720 --> 00:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a crazy tradcat. Do you want

322
00:20:55.480 --> 00:20:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a Skittles novasorto? Do you want to be

323
00:20:59.000 --> 00:21:02.079
<v Speaker 1>a do you want to go the route of the

324
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>diocesan Latin Mass. Oh turns out Francis has been shutting

325
00:21:05.720 --> 00:21:09.599
<v Speaker 1>those down, So good luck finding your way through the

326
00:21:09.640 --> 00:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>maze of this nightmare.

327
00:21:11.119 --> 00:21:15.880
<v Speaker 6>It was very clear extree me out of Protestantism. But then,

328
00:21:16.240 --> 00:21:19.079
<v Speaker 6>of course, a lot of the claims that we can

329
00:21:19.160 --> 00:21:22.240
<v Speaker 6>make for the papacy, we know very well the Orthodox

330
00:21:22.279 --> 00:21:24.759
<v Speaker 6>will say, Okay, I can be on board with that. Yeah,

331
00:21:25.319 --> 00:21:28.960
<v Speaker 6>but we know that that then changes when we go

332
00:21:29.000 --> 00:21:32.960
<v Speaker 6>into history, and in my opinion, the evidence for the

333
00:21:33.000 --> 00:21:36.480
<v Speaker 6>papacy on the Catholic side is much stronger.

334
00:21:36.920 --> 00:21:38.839
<v Speaker 4>Do you feel like on the Catholic side some of

335
00:21:38.880 --> 00:21:44.000
<v Speaker 4>the evidence that has been put forward sometimes is reading

336
00:21:44.039 --> 00:21:47.039
<v Speaker 4>too much into it. Not that there isn't strong evidence,

337
00:21:47.319 --> 00:21:51.000
<v Speaker 4>but what I'm saying is impopular apologetic circles. Yeah, do

338
00:21:51.039 --> 00:21:53.160
<v Speaker 4>you feel like some of the evidence that is put

339
00:21:53.200 --> 00:21:58.160
<v Speaker 4>forward is not necessarily the best that we have off Yes?

340
00:21:59.200 --> 00:22:02.079
<v Speaker 1>For once, I agree with Michael lofton probably ever right.

341
00:22:03.279 --> 00:22:08.599
<v Speaker 6>I think that there is a tendency to grab papal

342
00:22:08.640 --> 00:22:12.759
<v Speaker 6>sound bites, Peter sound bites where you will have a

343
00:22:12.839 --> 00:22:16.359
<v Speaker 6>quote of Peters being the head of the cheech, or

344
00:22:16.400 --> 00:22:19.279
<v Speaker 6>a Peter being the leader of the apostles, and we

345
00:22:19.319 --> 00:22:23.400
<v Speaker 6>will utilize that as an evidence of the papacy. And

346
00:22:23.680 --> 00:22:26.079
<v Speaker 6>as you know very well, Michael, a lot of those

347
00:22:26.160 --> 00:22:29.160
<v Speaker 6>quotes the Orthodox can very well give an aim into

348
00:22:29.839 --> 00:22:32.559
<v Speaker 6>and to add to that, Oriental Orthodox as well.

349
00:22:33.000 --> 00:22:36.079
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so actually from the outseter, I actually agree

350
00:22:36.119 --> 00:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>with this. So they've started off on surprisingly a pretty

351
00:22:40.920 --> 00:22:41.599
<v Speaker 1>good foot here.

352
00:22:42.319 --> 00:22:47.559
<v Speaker 6>What separates us when it comes to how we view

353
00:22:47.599 --> 00:22:52.400
<v Speaker 6>the papacy? I think that we need to go beyond

354
00:22:53.000 --> 00:22:57.119
<v Speaker 6>mirror quote bites. Sure, but here's another thing. I think

355
00:22:57.119 --> 00:22:59.559
<v Speaker 6>that once we do go beyond that, and we look

356
00:22:59.559 --> 00:23:04.519
<v Speaker 6>at the context, in my opinion scripturely and in the

357
00:23:04.559 --> 00:23:07.279
<v Speaker 6>early Church, there really is no other other position.

358
00:23:08.039 --> 00:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, okay, so I appreciate the admission that not all

359
00:23:13.200 --> 00:23:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, catchphrases Roma spoken cases closed right.

360
00:23:17.359 --> 00:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>We hear this all the time. There's a great post

361
00:23:21.000 --> 00:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>from Luigi pointing out that you look at the context

362
00:23:25.000 --> 00:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of let's see, I think I saved it. Let's let's

363
00:23:29.880 --> 00:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pull up Luigi quote here. Yeah. So, as one example

364
00:23:40.680 --> 00:23:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of this, right, we often hear the Romans spoken cases

365
00:23:43.319 --> 00:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>closed right, supposedly proving what exactly the final universal jurisdiction

366
00:23:50.200 --> 00:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>of the papacy. Well wait, wait a minute, Augustine in

367
00:23:53.200 --> 00:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>context says, let us suppose that the bishops who decided

368
00:23:56.160 --> 00:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a case at Rome were not good judges. Wait a minute,

369
00:23:58.640 --> 00:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>how is that possible? If bat can one true, there

370
00:24:00.960 --> 00:24:03.880
<v Speaker 1>still remains a plenary Council of the Universal Church in

371
00:24:03.920 --> 00:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>which these judges might be put on their defense, so

372
00:24:07.039 --> 00:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that if they were convicted of mistake, their decisions would

373
00:24:09.519 --> 00:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>be reversed. That's Augustine Letter forty three, paragraph nineteen. So no,

374
00:24:14.359 --> 00:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no When you take out of context statements like

375
00:24:18.519 --> 00:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Rome is spoken cases closed, which would be Rome's decision

376
00:24:21.680 --> 00:24:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a particular situation, it does not follow that Rome therefore

377
00:24:26.400 --> 00:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>had universal jurisdiction and everyone accepted it and it's therefore

378
00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>case closed. That's not what it meant. And he seems

379
00:24:33.480 --> 00:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to be maybe conceding part of that. I don't know

380
00:24:36.079 --> 00:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly which catchphrases he's talking about, but let's remember that

381
00:24:39.839 --> 00:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Chi eighty, the Chi eighty document here, this is the

382
00:24:54.240 --> 00:25:01.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty recent admission from the papacy about else the status

383
00:25:01.720 --> 00:25:05.519
<v Speaker 1>of the canons of Sartica and in what way Rome

384
00:25:05.640 --> 00:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was appealed to. This is the appellate structure. If you

385
00:25:08.240 --> 00:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>watch the debate between Ubi and Ibarra, right, some of

386
00:25:12.759 --> 00:25:15.519
<v Speaker 1>the material came up. And actually when I first debated

387
00:25:15.519 --> 00:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>aborrow years ago, I actually referenced this, and everyone sort

388
00:25:18.720 --> 00:25:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of laughed and poo pooed. What I said, but it's

389
00:25:21.880 --> 00:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>actually admitted right here in paragraph nineteen. Over the centuries,

390
00:25:26.480 --> 00:25:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the number of appeals were made to the Bishop of Rome,

391
00:25:28.359 --> 00:25:31.839
<v Speaker 1>also from the East, in disciplinary matters such as the

392
00:25:31.839 --> 00:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>deposition of a bishop. Now this sumption, because it notes

393
00:25:35.000 --> 00:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that the appeals were disciplinary in nature, this doesn't say

394
00:25:39.200 --> 00:25:43.319
<v Speaker 1>from the outset that the appeals are to settle theological

395
00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>doctrinal controversies. It says disciplinary matters such as the deposition

396
00:25:48.279 --> 00:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of a bishop and attempts was made at the cans

397
00:25:51.720 --> 00:25:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of Sartica in three forty three to establish the rules

398
00:25:54.359 --> 00:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of procedure. So this is the appellate structure where you

399
00:25:56.960 --> 00:26:00.839
<v Speaker 1>have kind of appeals court system. Right Artica was received

400
00:26:00.880 --> 00:26:03.799
<v Speaker 1>at Trollo in six po ninety two, and the Canons

401
00:26:03.799 --> 00:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>of Sartica determined that a bishop who had been condemned

402
00:26:06.599 --> 00:26:10.039
<v Speaker 1>could appeal to the Bishop of Rome, and that the latter,

403
00:26:10.079 --> 00:26:14.559
<v Speaker 1>if he deemed it appropriate, could order a retrial. Now,

404
00:26:15.279 --> 00:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>does this say that the Bishop of Rome unilaterally makes

405
00:26:18.160 --> 00:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the decision that shuts the door? It closed? Case closed?

406
00:26:24.319 --> 00:26:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Does this say Rome is spoken cases closed? No, it

407
00:26:28.279 --> 00:26:31.279
<v Speaker 1>says that the Biserrome can order a retrial to be

408
00:26:31.359 --> 00:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>conducted in the bishop's providence. It's not even conducted in Rome,

409
00:26:35.720 --> 00:26:42.599
<v Speaker 1>It's conducted in the bishop in questions own province. Appeals

410
00:26:42.640 --> 00:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>regarding disciplinary matters were also made to constantin Up. Remember

411
00:26:46.160 --> 00:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>when I said this in the bar debate and they

412
00:26:48.160 --> 00:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>all acted like I made this up. Oh, here's your

413
00:26:50.759 --> 00:26:56.519
<v Speaker 1>own papal page, your own papal approved acumenist document admitting

414
00:26:56.599 --> 00:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>my point. And to other seas. Yeah, of course. If

415
00:26:59.880 --> 00:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I I was Maximus and I was disputing with the

416
00:27:04.240 --> 00:27:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Monothelites and I wanted to get the bishops on my side,

417
00:27:09.160 --> 00:27:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna appeal to Rome and Constantinople and other seas,

418
00:27:13.319 --> 00:27:17.519
<v Speaker 1>and Antioch and Jerusalem and everywhere. I want them all

419
00:27:17.519 --> 00:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on my side. The fact that I appealed to Rome

420
00:27:20.519 --> 00:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>because it's the first see, it doesn't follow from that

421
00:27:23.119 --> 00:27:25.599
<v Speaker 1>that Rome is the only one that I would appeal to.

422
00:27:25.759 --> 00:27:28.839
<v Speaker 1>This is the silly argument of the Roman Catholics, especially

423
00:27:28.880 --> 00:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>a Barrow when I debated Borrow. Such appeals to the

424
00:27:33.160 --> 00:27:36.759
<v Speaker 1>major seas were always treated in a unilateral way. Oh,

425
00:27:36.880 --> 00:27:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't say that they were treated in a what

426
00:27:39.000 --> 00:27:44.039
<v Speaker 1>way synodical way. In other words, the Bishop of Rome

427
00:27:44.119 --> 00:27:48.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't out of hand autocratically determine the matter. It was

428
00:27:48.359 --> 00:27:55.759
<v Speaker 1>referred to a synod synodole. Why is Francis holding a

429
00:27:55.799 --> 00:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>synod on sinidelity? Because they're admitting our positions. This means

430
00:28:02.000 --> 00:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that Vatican one isn't true. Appeals to the Bishop of

431
00:28:06.960 --> 00:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Rome from the East expressed the communion of the church,

432
00:28:11.160 --> 00:28:14.279
<v Speaker 1>but the Bishop of Rome did not exercise canonical authority

433
00:28:14.279 --> 00:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>over the churches of the East. What does that tell

434
00:28:17.960 --> 00:28:23.039
<v Speaker 1>you right there? How is Vatican one true? When we

435
00:28:23.119 --> 00:28:25.599
<v Speaker 1>read that Vatican One, as you guys, I hope no,

436
00:28:26.200 --> 00:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>teaches that the Bishop of Rome has universal, unilateral jurisdiction

437
00:28:30.920 --> 00:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>over all of the world, and that he got that

438
00:28:33.720 --> 00:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>from Peter. Vatican one doesn't say that it evolved. It

439
00:28:37.160 --> 00:28:42.079
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a development of doctrine. It's from Peter.

440
00:28:45.000 --> 00:28:49.319
<v Speaker 4>It's most certainly one of those distinctive teachings that if

441
00:28:49.359 --> 00:28:53.799
<v Speaker 4>you were to embrace it, it's like the only real

442
00:28:53.839 --> 00:28:57.799
<v Speaker 4>option that you could go to is Catholicism. But you

443
00:28:57.880 --> 00:29:01.279
<v Speaker 4>then mentioned there, okay, but there is a certain form

444
00:29:01.680 --> 00:29:06.240
<v Speaker 4>of the papacy, if you will, that Orthodox can accept.

445
00:29:06.839 --> 00:29:10.799
<v Speaker 4>How different do you think is maybe a high Orthodox

446
00:29:10.920 --> 00:29:14.799
<v Speaker 4>version of the papacy is compared to the Captain version.

447
00:29:15.200 --> 00:29:17.839
<v Speaker 6>I think it is different enough that would warrant one

448
00:29:17.920 --> 00:29:22.839
<v Speaker 6>to convert to Catholicism. I truly do think it's that different.

449
00:29:24.039 --> 00:29:27.880
<v Speaker 6>I think that we are living in a time where

450
00:29:29.279 --> 00:29:32.599
<v Speaker 6>people are looking at the quotes of the papacy and

451
00:29:32.839 --> 00:29:36.880
<v Speaker 6>people that are Orthodox, and they realize, well, this doesn't

452
00:29:36.960 --> 00:29:40.480
<v Speaker 6>quite jibe with the way my view of the Church

453
00:29:40.559 --> 00:29:45.359
<v Speaker 6>is today. So they begin to read into history kinds

454
00:29:45.440 --> 00:29:49.640
<v Speaker 6>of words or teachings that they're they're kind of ripping

455
00:29:49.720 --> 00:29:54.680
<v Speaker 6>out of the context. For example, one incredible example, I

456
00:29:54.680 --> 00:29:57.240
<v Speaker 6>could think of the words of Pope Saint Leo the Great,

457
00:29:57.680 --> 00:30:03.000
<v Speaker 6>the tone of Leo at Calcdon. It's amazingly evident that

458
00:30:03.559 --> 00:30:06.559
<v Speaker 6>Pope Saint Leo the Great viewed his position as out

459
00:30:06.599 --> 00:30:08.319
<v Speaker 6>of papal supremacy.

460
00:30:10.480 --> 00:30:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny because this has already been debloomked by

461
00:30:14.359 --> 00:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the vast history that Ubi and Ibarra have already had.

462
00:30:20.559 --> 00:30:25.079
<v Speaker 1>So this is, I guess, playing on the ignorance of

463
00:30:25.119 --> 00:30:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the Catholic audience that Ubi and Ibarra have already been

464
00:30:28.079 --> 00:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>debating this for years, right, And this led to an

465
00:30:32.119 --> 00:30:39.559
<v Speaker 1>entire series of exchanges actually over many years, where Ubi

466
00:30:39.599 --> 00:30:45.359
<v Speaker 1>shows that the tone of Leo was not regarded as

467
00:30:45.519 --> 00:30:48.839
<v Speaker 1>ex cathedral. And if I recall, this is like years

468
00:30:48.880 --> 00:30:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of stuff going back. This was years ago, but he

469
00:30:53.440 --> 00:30:57.839
<v Speaker 1>just made this public a few months ago. If I recall, eventually,

470
00:30:57.880 --> 00:31:01.519
<v Speaker 1>I think Ibarra admitted that, Okay, maybe it's not an

471
00:31:01.519 --> 00:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>easy proof that the tone of Leo was ex cathedral.

472
00:31:06.559 --> 00:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So Ibara, if I recall, walked this back, and here

473
00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:15.079
<v Speaker 1>you go, right here, here's Ubi's refutation of point one that, no,

474
00:31:15.400 --> 00:31:19.079
<v Speaker 1>the tone of Leo does not prove ex cathedral. In fact,

475
00:31:19.640 --> 00:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Chalcedon if you read something like Denny's book Papalism, it

476
00:31:24.000 --> 00:31:27.759
<v Speaker 1>notes that Calcedon spent two weeks invested. It's either a

477
00:31:27.799 --> 00:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>week or two weeks investigating the tone to see if

478
00:31:31.920 --> 00:31:35.559
<v Speaker 1>it lined up with the teaching of Saint Cyril. Oh

479
00:31:35.599 --> 00:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, you thought Leo was the theologian part

480
00:31:38.880 --> 00:31:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of excellence of Calceodon. No, actually, the tone was judged

481
00:31:42.799 --> 00:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>by the synod to be either in accord with or

482
00:31:46.240 --> 00:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>out of accord with the teaching of Saint Cyril. So

483
00:31:50.079 --> 00:31:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Cyril was the measure of Calcedon. And you can read

484
00:31:53.559 --> 00:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that in the Denny text. And no, there's no ex

485
00:31:56.799 --> 00:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>cathedra argument out of the tone of Leo.

486
00:32:00.720 --> 00:32:03.400
<v Speaker 6>No way around that, right, the language is very clear,

487
00:32:03.759 --> 00:32:08.200
<v Speaker 6>and to deny that to me is you're gonna be

488
00:32:08.200 --> 00:32:08.599
<v Speaker 6>doing metal.

489
00:32:10.160 --> 00:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So again, argument number one has already been extensively refuted

490
00:32:13.759 --> 00:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in Ubi's refutation of Abara about Leo and Calcedon. Here

491
00:32:18.279 --> 00:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>again is the link. So argument number one was I

492
00:32:23.240 --> 00:32:28.279
<v Speaker 1>guess lazy on the part of all brect because he's

493
00:32:28.279 --> 00:32:30.759
<v Speaker 1>just repeating what probably what he read in Abara.

494
00:32:31.079 --> 00:32:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Leo most certainly held to what I would understand

495
00:32:34.960 --> 00:32:39.279
<v Speaker 4>to be the view of Vatican one supremacy. I don't

496
00:32:39.319 --> 00:32:40.079
<v Speaker 4>think that.

497
00:32:39.839 --> 00:32:44.039
<v Speaker 1>That is okay. Did you hear that the Vatican one

498
00:32:44.160 --> 00:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>view of papal supremacy unilateral, declarative, ex cathedral definitive teaching

499
00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:13.079
<v Speaker 1>right according to Vatican One, and that universality is directly

500
00:33:13.119 --> 00:33:17.319
<v Speaker 1>from Peter. It is directly to the papacy, does not

501
00:33:17.319 --> 00:33:21.559
<v Speaker 1>come from the Church. It comes directly from Peter to Rome.

502
00:33:21.960 --> 00:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Why it's not Antioch and Alexandria, which also derived from Peter. Well,

503
00:33:26.960 --> 00:33:29.799
<v Speaker 1>the Romancalloy Church just says because Peter died there. I mean,

504
00:33:29.839 --> 00:33:32.279
<v Speaker 1>it's just because it is, it's tradition. It's just because

505
00:33:32.960 --> 00:33:37.119
<v Speaker 1>although that we don't have any proof of that. I

506
00:33:37.119 --> 00:33:40.079
<v Speaker 1>mean proof that because he died there therefore the Keroism

507
00:33:40.160 --> 00:33:46.359
<v Speaker 1>extends to the Roman Church. We'll notice that, according to

508
00:33:46.599 --> 00:33:54.039
<v Speaker 1>Lofton and Ulbricht, all of the permanent premissy existed from

509
00:33:54.039 --> 00:34:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the earliest days up until now and it's unilateral. But

510
00:34:03.359 --> 00:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, what did Rome just admit in the

511
00:34:06.799 --> 00:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Chi eighty document appeals to the Bishop of Rome from

512
00:34:10.880 --> 00:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the east expressed the communion of the church, but the

513
00:34:13.400 --> 00:34:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Bishop of Rome did not exercise canonical authority over the

514
00:34:16.639 --> 00:34:22.079
<v Speaker 1>churches of the East. Oops disputable.

515
00:34:22.719 --> 00:34:25.400
<v Speaker 4>What I guess my concern is whenever I see some

516
00:34:26.280 --> 00:34:31.159
<v Speaker 4>Catholics pointing to the language at Calcedony where it says,

517
00:34:31.679 --> 00:34:37.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, Peter has spoken through Leo right, immediately thinking

518
00:34:37.800 --> 00:34:42.119
<v Speaker 4>that that automatically proved the Catholic view, or that the

519
00:34:42.159 --> 00:34:45.599
<v Speaker 4>Calcedonian fathers the Catholic view of the papsy. I'm not

520
00:34:45.639 --> 00:34:49.039
<v Speaker 4>saying that they didn't. But what I'm saying is, or

521
00:34:49.079 --> 00:34:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I guess what I'm asking is, do you think that

522
00:34:50.760 --> 00:34:53.280
<v Speaker 4>that alone is enough to really I don't.

523
00:34:53.639 --> 00:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>No, Yeah, and this is true, right, because you have

524
00:34:56.519 --> 00:35:01.039
<v Speaker 1>statements from pre Calcedonian church fathers that all of the

525
00:35:01.079 --> 00:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>bishops are Peter, right, Peter is a All the bishops

526
00:35:06.360 --> 00:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are images of little Peters. So this just the phrase

527
00:35:10.519 --> 00:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Peter has spoken through Leo, doesn't prove Vatican ones claim

528
00:35:17.119 --> 00:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Bishop of Rome is the singular, autocratic universal

529
00:35:24.079 --> 00:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>head of the entire church who can universally ex cathedra

530
00:35:28.039 --> 00:35:32.159
<v Speaker 1>pronounce dogmas. It doesn't prove that. So I appreciate again

531
00:35:32.199 --> 00:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that they're at least admitting a couple of things here

532
00:35:34.280 --> 00:35:39.039
<v Speaker 1>about these catchphrase arguments. But these catchphrase arguments actually don't

533
00:35:39.039 --> 00:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>address number one, the contradictions right that we referenced earlier,

534
00:35:45.920 --> 00:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the contradictions in what Roman Catholic dogma is in thirteen

535
00:35:50.039 --> 00:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>oh two, in when I'm sunk them right and when

536
00:35:53.400 --> 00:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm signed to them in thirteen oh two. You have

537
00:35:55.800 --> 00:35:58.559
<v Speaker 1>to believe in the temporal supremacy of the Roman bishop

538
00:35:58.639 --> 00:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to be saved in Vatican two. In terms of religious

539
00:36:03.960 --> 00:36:19.079
<v Speaker 1>liberty indignatatis humane. What's fundamental to the human being is

540
00:36:19.519 --> 00:36:26.559
<v Speaker 1>religious freedom dignitatis humane. HM. That's interesting because I seem

541
00:36:26.599 --> 00:36:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to remember a Roman Catholic document called the Syllabus of Errors.

542
00:36:40.480 --> 00:36:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Now Pius the ninth is the pope of Vatican two,

543
00:36:44.119 --> 00:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>mean Vatican One where you have the definition of the

544
00:36:47.440 --> 00:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>universal supremacy of the Roman Bishop. And it's interesting because

545
00:36:54.960 --> 00:37:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in this document he talks about errors can earning the

546
00:37:00.840 --> 00:37:16.599
<v Speaker 1>temporal supremacy of the Church and the Pope. And what's

547
00:37:16.639 --> 00:37:19.159
<v Speaker 1>funny about this is that as late as Vatican won,

548
00:37:20.159 --> 00:37:26.599
<v Speaker 1>you had the papacy still defending the temporal supremacy of

549
00:37:26.599 --> 00:37:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Bishop. So let's talk about number fifteen. Every

550
00:37:37.079 --> 00:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>man is free to embrace and profess the religion that

551
00:37:39.480 --> 00:37:44.760
<v Speaker 1>he guided by the light of reason and considers true condemned.

552
00:37:46.800 --> 00:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is the section of the Syllabus of Airs

553
00:37:48.760 --> 00:37:50.199
<v Speaker 1>of Pius the ninth. And by the way, this was

554
00:37:50.239 --> 00:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>attached to Vatican one, this is condemned in paragraph fifteen.

555
00:37:54.719 --> 00:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Right the rights to freedom of religion, freedom of choice,

556
00:37:59.039 --> 00:38:02.280
<v Speaker 1>man may and the observance of any religion whatsoever find salvation.

557
00:38:02.519 --> 00:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Was what does no retaughtes say that Hindus find refuge

558
00:38:07.440 --> 00:38:11.559
<v Speaker 1>in God in Hinduism, Men find refuge in God with

559
00:38:11.679 --> 00:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>love and trust. Man may, in the observance of any

560
00:38:15.440 --> 00:38:21.199
<v Speaker 1>religion whatsoever, find eternal salvation condemned. So then we come

561
00:38:21.239 --> 00:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>down to errors concerning the Church and her rights. The

562
00:38:24.039 --> 00:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Syllabus of errors. This specifically says the Church has not

563
00:38:29.000 --> 00:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the power of defining dogmatically that the Church is the

564
00:38:31.719 --> 00:38:35.079
<v Speaker 1>calogy Church is the true religion. Condemned. So, in other words,

565
00:38:35.119 --> 00:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>not having Catholic states, the Church does not have temporal power. Condemned.

566
00:38:46.039 --> 00:38:48.559
<v Speaker 1>The ministers of the Church and the Roman pontiff are

567
00:38:48.599 --> 00:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to be excluded from temporal dominion condemned. So US of

568
00:39:00.400 --> 00:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Errors paragraphs nineteen to twenty seven uphold the classic medieval

569
00:39:12.880 --> 00:39:21.119
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of dictatus Pope him sank them in the last paragraph.

570
00:39:21.519 --> 00:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You have to believe in the temporal supremacy to be

571
00:39:23.480 --> 00:39:26.639
<v Speaker 1>saved all the way up into the eighteen nineties, or

572
00:39:26.679 --> 00:39:30.280
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, eighteen sixty four, it's reaffirmed a Vatican one.

573
00:39:31.239 --> 00:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>The same positions are condemned. And what does Dignatati Himani do. Oh,

574
00:39:36.480 --> 00:39:43.559
<v Speaker 1>it turns out fundamental to humanity is religious liberty, and

575
00:39:43.599 --> 00:39:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't really teach that papal temporal supremacy anymore. You

576
00:39:47.880 --> 00:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>understand that, how could it be necessary for my salvation

577
00:39:51.360 --> 00:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>to believe in the temporal authority of the Roman bishop

578
00:39:53.880 --> 00:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>when religious liberty is true? Now, don't you see that

579
00:39:56.440 --> 00:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>those are incommensurable the right to religious liberty and freedom.

580
00:40:05.559 --> 00:40:09.760
<v Speaker 1>The Protestant doctrines of religious liberty and freedom fundamental to

581
00:40:10.199 --> 00:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>human liberty, something previously condemned. Where is it condemned? People

582
00:40:37.440 --> 00:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in single called Marai Vos eighteen thirty two liberalism and

583
00:40:43.360 --> 00:40:50.119
<v Speaker 1>religious indifferentism aka freedom of religion condemned. It is a

584
00:40:50.239 --> 00:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>heresy of the Enlightenment. Liberty of conscience, freedom of worship,

585
00:40:57.920 --> 00:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>freedom of the press. H oh condemned heresies? Uh oh

586
00:41:04.280 --> 00:41:19.559
<v Speaker 1>oh oh? Were there there is? Mauri Vos condemned. Liberty

587
00:41:19.599 --> 00:41:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of conscience, freedom of conscience, freedom of worshiped, freedom of press,

588
00:41:23.159 --> 00:41:31.719
<v Speaker 1>free speech condemned. What does voon can do? Say no,

589
00:41:31.840 --> 00:41:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's actually the fundamental element of human nature. Human dignity

590
00:41:40.440 --> 00:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is fundamentally religious freedom. Murori Vos Liberty of conscience, liberty

591
00:41:47.320 --> 00:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of worship, freedom of worship, indifferentism condemned.

592
00:41:55.760 --> 00:41:56.400
<v Speaker 6>Do you know why?

593
00:41:58.719 --> 00:42:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Because the papacy had mold and cyclicals against freemasonry, wherein

594
00:42:04.199 --> 00:42:09.119
<v Speaker 1>they charge liberty, equality and fraternity as free Masonic doctrines.

595
00:42:14.119 --> 00:42:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Vatican two accepts the liberalism condemned and Maururi boss yet

596
00:42:22.239 --> 00:42:23.079
<v Speaker 1>another example.

597
00:42:29.599 --> 00:42:32.360
<v Speaker 6>I think that you must supplement it with much more.

598
00:42:33.960 --> 00:42:37.320
<v Speaker 6>Number one, look at how was the tone of Leo

599
00:42:37.400 --> 00:42:42.280
<v Speaker 6>accepted or received right and then supplement that with how.

600
00:42:42.199 --> 00:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Did let's talk? Godfight dollars? William Albert says Jay doesn't

601
00:42:46.840 --> 00:42:49.159
<v Speaker 1>love Christ. That's all they have is this piety signaling right,

602
00:42:49.199 --> 00:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what they have. Sam said Jay is racist and

603
00:42:52.920 --> 00:42:58.639
<v Speaker 1>says the N word. What's he talking about? So that's

604
00:42:58.639 --> 00:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>all they have is like just personal at time. I mean,

605
00:43:01.400 --> 00:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to their arguments, that's all they have.

606
00:43:04.239 --> 00:43:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Thomas mc el hern two Canadian. I'm Protestant, but your

607
00:43:08.760 --> 00:43:11.199
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and videos are great. Thanks man. Terry seventy seven.

608
00:43:11.280 --> 00:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you suggest top five to ten books on the Papacy?

609
00:43:16.679 --> 00:43:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Edward Ginny Papalism, Abgat's The Papacy, Michael Welton's Two Paths

610
00:43:24.159 --> 00:43:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Papadacus Mayandorf Christian East in the Rise of the Papacy.

611
00:43:29.639 --> 00:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I would start there. Demon cooked two dollars. Imagine being

612
00:43:36.480 --> 00:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a cringey nerd crying about which church is the true church?

613
00:43:41.320 --> 00:43:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Escape the matrix and get some money. So I guess

614
00:43:43.559 --> 00:43:49.199
<v Speaker 1>we have a Tate fan Tristan five dollars. Andrew said,

615
00:43:49.199 --> 00:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>hey will host the debate. I don't know. I mean

616
00:43:57.360 --> 00:44:00.639
<v Speaker 1>sounds like they just want to play them and say

617
00:44:00.639 --> 00:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'm racist, Like this is like the weakest shit imaginable. Like,

618
00:44:03.599 --> 00:44:06.559
<v Speaker 1>so I'm actually going to their streams to refute their positions,

619
00:44:06.559 --> 00:44:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're calling you racist. There will be no debate.

620
00:44:10.400 --> 00:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Jay has made his point. Sam crashed out on his

621
00:44:13.519 --> 00:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>friend and then he blasphemed God and made fun of

622
00:44:15.719 --> 00:44:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the divine energies. I mean, it's just weird, dude. I

623
00:44:18.679 --> 00:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the like, what the point of the

624
00:44:22.960 --> 00:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>energies thing is here.

625
00:44:26.880 --> 00:44:28.760
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna call you out. We're gonna get you. Don't

626
00:44:28.760 --> 00:44:32.559
<v Speaker 3>worry about it now, girl, get some more energies.

627
00:44:32.639 --> 00:44:33.360
<v Speaker 5>Maybe will help you.

628
00:44:37.639 --> 00:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Go get more energies. Maybe they'll help you out. I mean,

629
00:44:39.719 --> 00:44:42.039
<v Speaker 1>does he not realize it's the New Testament teaching?

630
00:44:42.079 --> 00:44:42.559
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

631
00:44:44.800 --> 00:44:49.320
<v Speaker 6>You himself. And then if he viewed himself in this manner,

632
00:44:49.400 --> 00:44:53.239
<v Speaker 6>where was the uproar on the side of those that

633
00:44:53.320 --> 00:44:56.679
<v Speaker 6>accepted his tomb And the other thing, as well, as

634
00:44:56.679 --> 00:44:58.960
<v Speaker 6>we know very well, is that Pope Saint Leo the

635
00:44:59.000 --> 00:45:03.559
<v Speaker 6>greats Tone was essentially saying the same thing as Cyril

636
00:45:04.159 --> 00:45:06.880
<v Speaker 6>was saying in as.

637
00:45:06.480 --> 00:45:09.360
<v Speaker 1>In his Yeah, but you're leaving out the point that

638
00:45:09.400 --> 00:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they investigated the tone to see if it was what

639
00:45:12.519 --> 00:45:15.559
<v Speaker 1>measured up to Cyril's teaching, so they didn't mention.

640
00:45:15.400 --> 00:45:19.400
<v Speaker 6>It christological position. So then when we see that, we

641
00:45:19.519 --> 00:45:22.840
<v Speaker 6>realized that Pope Saint Leo the Great was in line

642
00:45:22.880 --> 00:45:27.159
<v Speaker 6>with the great Christological teachings, and we realized how much

643
00:45:28.320 --> 00:45:32.039
<v Speaker 6>the teachings that Calca impacted. Because let me be very

644
00:45:32.079 --> 00:45:35.280
<v Speaker 6>clear with you, today you can listen to a Protestant

645
00:45:37.639 --> 00:45:39.599
<v Speaker 6>individual talking about Christology.

646
00:45:39.760 --> 00:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Now let's point out the absurdity of William Albrecks, because

647
00:45:44.039 --> 00:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure William Albreck holds the position that, like

648
00:45:47.320 --> 00:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Voice of Reason says, Ephesus was wrong in condemning Nestorius.

649
00:45:53.800 --> 00:45:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't he say this? I think he does, right, But

650
00:45:56.920 --> 00:45:59.079
<v Speaker 1>let me show you how stupid this position is right here.

651
00:46:00.639 --> 00:46:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'll play your Voice of Reason saying this. And

652
00:46:04.280 --> 00:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where they get this, like maybe they

653
00:46:05.840 --> 00:46:10.559
<v Speaker 1>get it from Jimmy Aikin, because I know Akin says this.

654
00:46:12.159 --> 00:46:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna show you how dumb this is. Right

655
00:46:14.360 --> 00:46:15.679
<v Speaker 1>here's a Voice of Reasons saying this.

656
00:46:16.800 --> 00:46:21.199
<v Speaker 7>Documents set up being used are uh seruitous. So the

657
00:46:21.280 --> 00:46:24.280
<v Speaker 7>church isn't protected in matters of fact, The church is

658
00:46:24.320 --> 00:46:28.239
<v Speaker 7>only protected only infallible and matters of morals, in the

659
00:46:28.280 --> 00:46:31.679
<v Speaker 7>same way that when the Council of Emphasis condemned the

660
00:46:31.719 --> 00:46:34.760
<v Speaker 7>stories is irritated. We don't know looking back that the

661
00:46:34.800 --> 00:46:37.320
<v Speaker 7>council was actually in the correct It turns out that

662
00:46:37.360 --> 00:46:40.519
<v Speaker 7>the story is wasn't in a story, but the council

663
00:46:40.599 --> 00:46:44.639
<v Speaker 7>is still condemned the us as an Astorian documents up

664
00:46:44.679 --> 00:46:45.320
<v Speaker 7>being used.

665
00:46:45.800 --> 00:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So notice he's made up an absurd distinction between councils

666
00:46:51.000 --> 00:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>getting the dogma's right and missing and airing in matters

667
00:46:54.239 --> 00:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of fact. Let's see how that actually works with the

668
00:46:56.519 --> 00:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>anathemas of ephesis.

669
00:46:59.079 --> 00:47:03.159
<v Speaker 7>So it isn't protected matters fact. The church is only

670
00:47:03.239 --> 00:47:07.519
<v Speaker 7>protected only infallible in morals in the same way that.

671
00:47:07.559 --> 00:47:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Is going to become. So does he think that the

672
00:47:10.679 --> 00:47:14.800
<v Speaker 1>condemnation and the anathemas against Nestorias aren't faith in morals?

673
00:47:15.239 --> 00:47:17.599
<v Speaker 1>That sounds stupid. This position is right because when I

674
00:47:17.639 --> 00:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>go to the anathemas, the twelve anathemas right here, like,

675
00:47:21.280 --> 00:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>does he think that this is not faith and morals

676
00:47:23.400 --> 00:47:25.519
<v Speaker 1>they're just airing in fact? Does he not realize that

677
00:47:25.559 --> 00:47:29.199
<v Speaker 1>all the anathemas are about the dual subject position of Nestorius,

678
00:47:32.039 --> 00:47:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're all from Cyril and his theology right, because Cyril,

679
00:47:35.800 --> 00:47:41.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, argues from the Eucharist against uh Nesaurius. So

680
00:47:41.719 --> 00:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that would mean all of these arguments weren't just matters

681
00:47:44.440 --> 00:47:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of fact that we're wrong, they were also theologically wrong

682
00:47:48.480 --> 00:47:53.280
<v Speaker 1>because Cyril didn't need to make Eucharistic arguments against Nastorias.

683
00:47:53.320 --> 00:47:56.599
<v Speaker 1>That's how stupid this is. Right when it talks about

684
00:47:56.639 --> 00:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the life giving flesh. Right, if anyone does not confess

685
00:48:01.320 --> 00:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that the flesh of the Lord is life giving and

686
00:48:03.480 --> 00:48:07.760
<v Speaker 1>belongs to the Word of God the Father, that's talking

687
00:48:07.800 --> 00:48:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about the Eucharist, right. If you read Cyril the two

688
00:48:10.400 --> 00:48:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Letters to sicx senses, Cyril talks about the Eucharist giving

689
00:48:14.239 --> 00:48:18.440
<v Speaker 1>us and being a life giving thing, and he also

690
00:48:18.480 --> 00:48:23.559
<v Speaker 1>teaches the energies doctrine right explicitly, so he doesn't even

691
00:48:23.639 --> 00:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>understand that denying ephesis condemnation of Astorias doesn't just preserve

692
00:48:32.639 --> 00:48:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the teaching of dogma and not fact in the council

693
00:48:37.760 --> 00:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>some arbitrary thing he made up. It actually undoes the

694
00:48:41.000 --> 00:48:45.840
<v Speaker 1>entire argumentation of the anathemas because Cyril didn't then correctly

695
00:48:45.920 --> 00:48:49.760
<v Speaker 1>understand Nestorious position and all the anathemas. That's how stupid

696
00:48:49.800 --> 00:48:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this is. And by the way, I'm pretty sure Albrecht

697
00:48:54.360 --> 00:48:59.119
<v Speaker 1>holds that position that the Nestorians aren't really Nestorians all

698
00:48:59.119 --> 00:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the way. I think Shamun does too, which is just idiotic.

699
00:49:02.519 --> 00:49:06.079
<v Speaker 1>They don't even know what the anathemas are about. They're

700
00:49:06.159 --> 00:49:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Cyril's theology against Nastorius's theology. So if it's wrong, then

701
00:49:10.639 --> 00:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you deny Ephesus. And he just said Chalcedon lines up

702
00:49:14.360 --> 00:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with ephesis. Yeah, but you think emphasis made a mistake,

703
00:49:16.559 --> 00:49:20.199
<v Speaker 1>dun't he look at the wide ranging.

704
00:49:19.960 --> 00:49:23.559
<v Speaker 6>Effect it's had. But then look at the claims Pope

705
00:49:23.559 --> 00:49:25.920
<v Speaker 6>Saint Lee of the Great and made for himself. Yeah,

706
00:49:25.960 --> 00:49:28.840
<v Speaker 6>he clearly viewed a lot of He viewed the power

707
00:49:28.840 --> 00:49:32.400
<v Speaker 6>of those keys is being given to the successor Saint.

708
00:49:32.159 --> 00:49:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Peter, and he thought that he exercised them in a

709
00:49:35.079 --> 00:49:38.920
<v Speaker 4>unique way. Not that he wouldn't say that other bishops,

710
00:49:40.119 --> 00:49:42.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, aren't successors to Saint Peter. He I think

711
00:49:42.639 --> 00:49:44.280
<v Speaker 4>he would, But that.

712
00:49:44.360 --> 00:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Isn't They are accusing you of calling Sam a bald inward.

713
00:49:49.079 --> 00:49:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I've never done that. William has a fake account calling

714
00:49:53.159 --> 00:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you racial slurs. I mean, that's bizarre. Sue them. These

715
00:50:02.880 --> 00:50:06.119
<v Speaker 1>are just mentally ill people. Man, Me and Eugene five dollars.

716
00:50:06.119 --> 00:50:11.199
<v Speaker 1>The Black delegation did not give Shamoun a pass as

717
00:50:11.199 --> 00:50:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there's goes two dollars, you know, Father Damien Quilt, I

718
00:50:13.519 --> 00:50:20.199
<v Speaker 1>do not everyone is going to the Lake of Lava.

719
00:50:20.519 --> 00:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The moon landings are not are real or they are fake.

720
00:50:24.880 --> 00:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I do not like takes. This is a matrix attack.

721
00:50:27.079 --> 00:50:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh that doesn't make any sense. So Samuel Joseph, imagine

722
00:50:35.199 --> 00:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>if you had joined Sam's petty little stream and just

723
00:50:40.519 --> 00:50:43.719
<v Speaker 1>said nothing and said, man, I'm sweepy. I gotta go

724
00:50:43.760 --> 00:50:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to sweet Sam and Willow are live right now. This

725
00:50:49.840 --> 00:50:52.199
<v Speaker 1>is a debate for the boys. I will moderate Josh

726
00:50:52.320 --> 00:50:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Jehoshah fat Z five dollars. I want to thank you

727
00:50:56.360 --> 00:50:58.039
<v Speaker 1>for your content. I going to Orthodox Church for the

728
00:50:58.079 --> 00:51:01.800
<v Speaker 1>first time. I have yet to find anything false about Orthodox.

729
00:51:01.800 --> 00:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He started off as a dispensationalist. Now I'm here make

730
00:51:09.000 --> 00:51:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sure I'm hitting all the super juds.

731
00:51:14.760 --> 00:51:17.840
<v Speaker 4>Mean that he wouldn't claim a unique version of papal

732
00:51:17.920 --> 00:51:19.480
<v Speaker 4>succession for the Bishop of.

733
00:51:19.519 --> 00:51:22.239
<v Speaker 6>Rome, and I think, Michael, that point is the number

734
00:51:22.280 --> 00:51:25.199
<v Speaker 6>one the one we have to focus on, because what

735
00:51:25.280 --> 00:51:29.639
<v Speaker 6>I hear very often in popular apologetics is oh, well,

736
00:51:29.719 --> 00:51:31.679
<v Speaker 6>Peter is the only one that got the keys, so

737
00:51:31.920 --> 00:51:35.159
<v Speaker 6>of course the pope has a special role. Then they

738
00:51:35.159 --> 00:51:36.880
<v Speaker 6>failed to realize.

739
00:51:41.599 --> 00:51:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So uh, I think if I if I hop on there,

740
00:51:56.119 --> 00:52:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they're amazable immediately gonna lose it, right, So I don't

741
00:52:01.320 --> 00:52:10.800
<v Speaker 1>trust them to Like I'm thinking about it, I don't know.

742
00:52:10.840 --> 00:52:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I understand what you're saying about a fake, fake account

743
00:52:14.480 --> 00:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>calling people the ND word that I don't. That doesn't

744
00:52:16.880 --> 00:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. What does that mean? He's fighting a

745
00:52:21.480 --> 00:52:24.880
<v Speaker 1>fake Jaydier account? Oh you mean they're like having a

746
00:52:24.920 --> 00:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>fake debate. So it's for them, it's just like a

747
00:52:28.480 --> 00:52:34.679
<v Speaker 1>clown show. I don't understand. What's they're having a fake debate?

748
00:52:40.400 --> 00:52:43.039
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about supporting Israel? Does he make

749
00:52:43.079 --> 00:52:48.599
<v Speaker 1>any sense? I'm going to debate a post prophet? What

750
00:52:48.639 --> 00:52:49.239
<v Speaker 1>does that mean?

751
00:52:55.960 --> 00:52:56.079
<v Speaker 4>So?

752
00:52:56.639 --> 00:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Where is their stream? Let's see on on Skype? Let

753
00:53:06.000 --> 00:53:33.800
<v Speaker 1>me see if I can get on Skype. Let me

754
00:53:34.239 --> 00:53:35.400
<v Speaker 1>find the profile here.

755
00:53:35.480 --> 00:55:27.519
<v Speaker 8>Let's see just one second the five games.

756
00:56:27.239 --> 00:56:29.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling it a skype.

757
00:56:56.559 --> 00:56:57.159
<v Speaker 6>No answer.

758
00:57:07.360 --> 00:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>The easiest way to do this would be for them

759
00:57:11.000 --> 00:57:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to answer on the phone, and then we can have

760
00:57:14.280 --> 00:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this today that way. It's very simple. But I'm going

761
00:57:19.800 --> 00:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to stick to the doctrines. So I don't know why

762
00:57:22.039 --> 00:57:24.760
<v Speaker 1>he I mean, they want they want me to hop on.

763
00:57:24.840 --> 00:57:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. I'm not going to end my stream

764
00:57:26.760 --> 00:57:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to go to their stream. We can both have this

765
00:57:31.400 --> 00:57:39.519
<v Speaker 1>discussion right here. Oh wait a minute. It has to

766
00:57:39.519 --> 00:57:41.639
<v Speaker 1>be on a neutral platform. I thought they told me

767
00:57:41.679 --> 00:57:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to just come to their stream. I mean this is

768
00:57:46.199 --> 00:57:56.039
<v Speaker 1>a neutral platform. Okay, so come to my stream. I

769
00:57:56.079 --> 00:57:58.559
<v Speaker 1>call in to his stream on his sky But now

770
00:57:58.559 --> 00:58:09.119
<v Speaker 1>it's now it has to be on a neutral platform.

771
00:58:09.239 --> 00:58:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call one more time. Let's do it. I'm

772
00:58:11.840 --> 00:58:15.239
<v Speaker 1>calling in right now. Would be really easy. Let's do it.

773
00:58:32.519 --> 00:58:34.559
<v Speaker 1>All he's got to do is have the discussion right now,

774
00:58:54.760 --> 00:58:59.960
<v Speaker 1>so you won't answer. I'm not gonna I'm not leaving

775
00:59:00.159 --> 00:59:02.920
<v Speaker 1>my stream to go to his stream when we could

776
00:59:02.960 --> 00:59:05.119
<v Speaker 1>do it this way and it would be both of

777
00:59:05.199 --> 00:59:08.920
<v Speaker 1>us having. He can continue streaming, I can continue streaming.

778
00:59:09.519 --> 00:59:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I can't continue streaming if I go to his stream yard.

779
00:59:19.840 --> 00:59:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Or he can just send me a stream yardard link in.

780
00:59:23.119 --> 00:59:29.639
<v Speaker 1>He can send me the stream yard link in Skype.

781
00:59:34.039 --> 00:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Send me the link here here. I can continue streaming.

782
00:59:42.880 --> 00:59:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Send me the link here. See, like I told you,

783
00:59:58.880 --> 01:00:02.559
<v Speaker 1>the whole reason that he went on this collapse mode,

784
01:00:04.119 --> 01:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>it was because he doesn't want to actually have that debate.

785
01:00:09.840 --> 01:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>He's always saying he wants to be teachable and corrected,

786
01:00:14.760 --> 01:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and so I the whole thing is because I invited

787
01:00:18.719 --> 01:00:22.559
<v Speaker 1>him and his handler to come discuss on my channel

788
01:00:22.599 --> 01:00:30.679
<v Speaker 1>with time responses, and the solution would be send me

789
01:00:30.719 --> 01:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the link and we can stream it at the same time.

790
01:00:37.000 --> 01:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So all he's got to do is send me the

791
01:00:38.519 --> 01:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Link'll y'all, let's do with this. I don't want to

792
01:00:40.440 --> 01:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>stop streaming. I'm not that way. He can have his stream,

793
01:00:44.039 --> 01:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I can have my stream, and we can both talk

794
01:00:45.880 --> 01:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on a device. You see. So you notice he won't

795
01:00:49.800 --> 01:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>answer the phone. They told me to come to his stream.

796
01:00:52.639 --> 01:00:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it, and he won't answer the phone. He

797
01:00:56.719 --> 01:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>calls you a cult leader while he was looking at

798
01:00:58.840 --> 01:01:01.559
<v Speaker 1>memes about you. Yeah, he won't debate the issues. So

799
01:01:01.719 --> 01:01:04.719
<v Speaker 1>look here you have it. Everybody can see Sam Shimun

800
01:01:04.760 --> 01:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to actually debate the issues when that's what

801
01:01:07.480 --> 01:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm bringing up, and he would rather play mean games

802
01:01:12.480 --> 01:01:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and like make fun of people or whatever whatever with me.

803
01:01:16.360 --> 01:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So you can't defend these issues, like I'm sorry that

804
01:01:19.360 --> 01:01:21.519
<v Speaker 1>you had a meltdown over me just simply asking you

805
01:01:21.559 --> 01:01:32.159
<v Speaker 1>to come and have a conversation about it. He says,

806
01:01:32.199 --> 01:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you're an ortho slut and you want join I'm trying

807
01:01:34.800 --> 01:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to join his stream right here. I called three times,

808
01:01:38.599 --> 01:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>send me the link, and he's not answering because he

809
01:01:45.039 --> 01:01:51.039
<v Speaker 1>knows he doesn't want to have this actual debate. If

810
01:01:51.039 --> 01:01:54.079
<v Speaker 1>he wants to go on the Crucible, we can go

811
01:01:54.119 --> 01:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have a debate on the Crucible right now. How's that

812
01:02:14.800 --> 01:02:24.039
<v Speaker 1>go to Crucible? Then it would be a neutral platform

813
01:02:24.760 --> 01:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if we both streamed it from our phone. So if

814
01:02:26.880 --> 01:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he wants to leave, he wants to boot me, he

815
01:02:28.800 --> 01:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>can do that. I'm still streaming. I don't have to

816
01:02:32.119 --> 01:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>go to his stream. He doesn't have to go to mine.

817
01:02:35.679 --> 01:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Very simple, simple solution, or we'll go to the Crucible.

818
01:02:42.079 --> 01:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you he doesn't want to debate me on

819
01:02:43.880 --> 01:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Crucible right now. I guarantee you won't. He won't

820
01:02:46.880 --> 01:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do it. They said you called in on stream yard.

821
01:02:53.800 --> 01:02:56.039
<v Speaker 1>I didn't call on stream yard. I called right here.

822
01:02:58.639 --> 01:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>They said you were sending message. I'm not on stream yard.

823
01:03:01.880 --> 01:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't I don't have the stream yard link. There's

824
01:03:06.440 --> 01:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>me calling him three times on Skype that Skype send

825
01:03:10.480 --> 01:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>me the link here. I don't have the link inverted

826
01:03:16.519 --> 01:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>big toe Jay is one of percent Sigma Energy orb.

827
01:03:21.719 --> 01:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>They're acting like you went to the live chat and

828
01:03:23.719 --> 01:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>called him a bad word. That's not me, man, How

829
01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>am I doing that when I'm on here? Is he

830
01:03:28.400 --> 01:03:31.559
<v Speaker 1>that stupid? He falls for any profile that has like

831
01:03:31.840 --> 01:03:43.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not me, dummy, I did en joined his live stream.

832
01:03:43.639 --> 01:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Sam is saying that you posted in his back channel.

833
01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't have his back channel. I am on Skype.

834
01:03:48.599 --> 01:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not me, dummies. Do you know what Skype sounds like?

835
01:04:05.280 --> 01:04:08.519
<v Speaker 1>And to mind two dollars, Protestants need to take a

836
01:04:08.519 --> 01:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>back seat. I'm watching a schism in real time. This

837
01:04:11.400 --> 01:04:14.239
<v Speaker 1>is not a schism because there's only one church and

838
01:04:14.519 --> 01:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not the made up Apostolic churches that he has

839
01:04:18.519 --> 01:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in his head. I don't like your Sam because you

840
01:04:23.480 --> 01:04:30.079
<v Speaker 1>bass Protestants. However, Sam is acting like an old cringe vagina.

841
01:04:30.639 --> 01:04:34.679
<v Speaker 1>He said that he won't answer because you only want

842
01:04:34.679 --> 01:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk. Now that William left his stream, tell him

843
01:04:38.760 --> 01:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and William to go onto the crucible. Let's do it

844
01:04:40.960 --> 01:04:57.239
<v Speaker 1>right now. Bring William to the crucible. Now, bring William

845
01:04:57.280 --> 01:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>to the Crucible now, So every excuse he's making, I'm

846
01:05:02.039 --> 01:05:05.559
<v Speaker 1>giving him a way out. He won't do it one

847
01:05:05.599 --> 01:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to one on the freaking phone. He won't do it

848
01:05:10.039 --> 01:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one to one on the phone on stream yard. He

849
01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>won't do it one to one on the Crucible. Okay,

850
01:05:16.079 --> 01:05:18.079
<v Speaker 1>bring William to the Crucible. I'll debate you both. I'm

851
01:05:18.119 --> 01:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>not at all worried about this issue. It's like Sam

852
01:05:31.440 --> 01:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>has resorted now to only calling you slurs. Well that's

853
01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't want a debate to begin with. He

854
01:05:36.079 --> 01:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>never wanted a debate. He just wanted a spurgout because

855
01:05:40.519 --> 01:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he can't actually defend these positions. So again, tell him

856
01:05:44.360 --> 01:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and all brect they can debate me, me versus them

857
01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>two on the crucible. So all he has is nasty talk.

858
01:05:59.559 --> 01:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>There you go, oh, like, this is the guy that

859
01:06:02.880 --> 01:06:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to go with if you're a Roman Catholic

860
01:06:07.960 --> 01:06:09.639
<v Speaker 1>And this is the fruits of Rome. Man, this is

861
01:06:09.679 --> 01:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>what you guys get with Roman Catholicism. Is this stuff

862
01:06:24.119 --> 01:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to remind you, this is he He thinks

863
01:06:27.880 --> 01:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the energies of God, the uncreated energies, are something that

864
01:06:30.920 --> 01:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you just joke about. He doesn't even know that they're

865
01:06:34.719 --> 01:06:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the basis for the Theophanies.

866
01:06:38.760 --> 01:06:40.639
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna call you out. We're gonna get you. Don't

867
01:06:40.639 --> 01:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>worry about it now, girl, get some more energies.

868
01:06:44.559 --> 01:06:51.280
<v Speaker 5>Maybe will help you you.

869
01:06:55.159 --> 01:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, thanks for the received queer bait.

870
01:06:57.039 --> 01:06:58.639
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna show them who ran from William.

871
01:06:59.400 --> 01:07:00.039
<v Speaker 6>Damn gar.

872
01:07:02.840 --> 01:07:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm running from William. I'm literally telling them to

873
01:07:05.239 --> 01:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>go to the crucible right now. All right, let's get

874
01:07:15.039 --> 01:07:18.039
<v Speaker 1>back to this. Since this is they're not gonna He's

875
01:07:18.079 --> 01:07:20.599
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do it.

876
01:07:19.360 --> 01:07:22.760
<v Speaker 6>That the language lends itself to the fact that we

877
01:07:22.920 --> 01:07:27.159
<v Speaker 6>recognize that the keys were received by the other bishops

878
01:07:27.159 --> 01:07:30.159
<v Speaker 6>as well by the other apostles, but Saint Peter, in

879
01:07:30.199 --> 01:07:33.320
<v Speaker 6>a very special way received them. And how are they

880
01:07:33.360 --> 01:07:35.679
<v Speaker 6>able to utilize those as well when they are in

881
01:07:36.159 --> 01:07:40.920
<v Speaker 6>union with the pope, with Saint Peter, the successor of

882
01:07:40.920 --> 01:07:43.360
<v Speaker 6>Saint Peter. I think that that's the one area where

883
01:07:43.480 --> 01:07:44.239
<v Speaker 6>they get tripped up.

884
01:07:44.719 --> 01:07:47.119
<v Speaker 4>I think so, And I'm glad you brought up this point,

885
01:07:47.119 --> 01:07:50.119
<v Speaker 4>because it is true that the other apostles received the

886
01:07:50.119 --> 01:07:53.000
<v Speaker 4>case of kingdom as well. Sometimes I think we overseail

887
01:07:53.039 --> 01:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>our position by saying that only Peter received.

888
01:07:56.039 --> 01:07:56.119
<v Speaker 3>No.

889
01:07:56.480 --> 01:07:58.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the rest of the apostles also received the case

890
01:07:58.760 --> 01:08:00.880
<v Speaker 4>of the kingdom. But that does mean that we can't

891
01:08:00.960 --> 01:08:03.559
<v Speaker 4>say that Peter received them in a unique way, no doubt,

892
01:08:03.719 --> 01:08:06.480
<v Speaker 4>or that we could maybe speak about the apostles receiving

893
01:08:06.519 --> 01:08:07.880
<v Speaker 4>the keys of the Kingdom through Peter.

894
01:08:12.480 --> 01:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They want to talk about the biblical case for the papacy.

895
01:08:15.559 --> 01:08:19.239
<v Speaker 1>In the Bible, Jesus breathes on all the apostles. It

896
01:08:19.279 --> 01:08:22.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come on Peter first and then to the apostles

897
01:08:22.560 --> 01:08:29.279
<v Speaker 1>at Pentecost. The Holy Spirit comes down on all of them.

898
01:08:29.359 --> 01:08:31.399
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't go to Peter and then Peter give the

899
01:08:31.399 --> 01:08:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Holy Spirit to the rest of the apostles at Pentecost.

900
01:08:34.880 --> 01:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll look at that he ran away, so he had

901
01:08:36.640 --> 01:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to come on to the crucible. Rachel says,

902
01:08:40.800 --> 01:08:44.359
<v Speaker 1>for five dollars, the crucible is on standby, ready and waiting.

903
01:08:44.399 --> 01:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>If Sam accepts. I sent him multiple calls and multiple opportunities.

904
01:08:54.479 --> 01:08:57.039
<v Speaker 1>I called it. We could have had that. There's no

905
01:08:57.119 --> 01:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>reason not to have it multi streaming at the same time. Right,

906
01:09:04.600 --> 01:09:08.239
<v Speaker 1>All he has to do is hop on and he

907
01:09:08.279 --> 01:09:10.279
<v Speaker 1>thinks I'm over there like watching his stream, like, oh,

908
01:09:10.319 --> 01:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna wait until I'm gonna wait until William leaves,

909
01:09:12.600 --> 01:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll call him. Dude, you and William can

910
01:09:15.840 --> 01:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>go on the Crucible and we'll do it right now.

911
01:09:20.239 --> 01:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam just ran away. Well, what did you expect? All

912
01:09:28.840 --> 01:09:31.279
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to do was bitch and wine and lose it.

913
01:09:31.680 --> 01:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>None of them want to talk about the actual issues.

914
01:09:34.039 --> 01:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's all they want to do as well.

915
01:09:37.840 --> 01:09:41.359
<v Speaker 6>And I think that language there is probably the clearest

916
01:09:41.680 --> 01:09:44.880
<v Speaker 6>if we emphasize that. But the other thing that people

917
01:09:45.439 --> 01:09:48.720
<v Speaker 6>they get tripped up on Michael is the fact that they'll.

918
01:09:48.479 --> 01:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Say, Okay, wait, he brought William back and into the stream.

919
01:09:52.439 --> 01:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I sat there calling him and asking him to do it.

920
01:09:55.279 --> 01:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That's so ridiculous. I mean, do you have a bed time?

921
01:10:00.119 --> 01:10:00.199
<v Speaker 5>Like?

922
01:10:00.840 --> 01:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Did you have a coof you? Like, I'm awake. Let's

923
01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>go to the Crucible. I'll just fire up some more coffee,

924
01:10:06.520 --> 01:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>let's debate all night, let's do it.

925
01:10:07.880 --> 01:10:11.319
<v Speaker 6>Apostles receive the Well, then why do we need why

926
01:10:11.359 --> 01:10:13.079
<v Speaker 6>do we need to Saint Peter? You need to see

927
01:10:13.119 --> 01:10:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Peter because they were able to utilize them by being

928
01:10:16.560 --> 01:10:19.319
<v Speaker 6>in union with the head of.

929
01:10:19.199 --> 01:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>The Why do we need a Saint Peter? Let's hear

930
01:10:21.760 --> 01:10:25.279
<v Speaker 1>this brilliant response again. Why do we need a Saint Peter?

931
01:10:25.760 --> 01:10:28.800
<v Speaker 6>Why do we need to Saint Peter. You need to

932
01:10:28.800 --> 01:10:32.159
<v Speaker 6>see Peter because they were able to utilize them by

933
01:10:32.199 --> 01:10:33.760
<v Speaker 6>being in union with the head.

934
01:10:34.680 --> 01:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>They were able to utilize them by being in union

935
01:10:37.039 --> 01:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>with the head. You need a Saint Peter because they

936
01:10:40.199 --> 01:10:42.399
<v Speaker 1>were able to utilize them by being in union with

937
01:10:42.479 --> 01:10:48.039
<v Speaker 1>the head. So a pragmatic argument that doesn't tell me

938
01:10:48.079 --> 01:10:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that Vatican One is in the text. It doesn't actually

939
01:10:51.119 --> 01:10:53.479
<v Speaker 1>tell me in the text that Peter is the head.

940
01:10:54.279 --> 01:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>We in the Orthodox Church call him Corphaeus, the mouthpiece

941
01:10:57.359 --> 01:11:04.039
<v Speaker 1>of the apostles, but the single unilateral head. Where was

942
01:11:04.079 --> 01:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>that in anything that we've seen so far. We've seen

943
01:11:06.359 --> 01:11:12.159
<v Speaker 1>a reference to Leo, we've seen a admission that you

944
01:11:12.199 --> 01:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>can't just use catchphrases. I've not yet heard an actual

945
01:11:17.840 --> 01:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>argument for the papacy yet. So let's see when we

946
01:11:20.920 --> 01:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>get that Sam got jay diarrhea. Wendy Torretz. The Muslims

947
01:11:26.239 --> 01:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>are having a field day with Sam manifesting. I mean,

948
01:11:31.640 --> 01:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>all of this is ridiculous because I sent him one

949
01:11:36.399 --> 01:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>message at the beginning of the day when he was

950
01:11:39.640 --> 01:11:43.279
<v Speaker 1>doing his stream asking him if him and William want

951
01:11:43.319 --> 01:11:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to come and have a timed response on my channel,

952
01:11:47.079 --> 01:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and he just lost it for he had a total

953
01:11:49.359 --> 01:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>meltdown over nothing and it's just crazy. And then he

954
01:11:55.640 --> 01:11:58.359
<v Speaker 1>goes into like mocking the divine energies. It's just crazy, man,

955
01:11:58.359 --> 01:12:02.399
<v Speaker 1>it's weird. Jay, here's two dollars. You did it for

956
01:12:02.439 --> 01:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the chat. You're a g makeing sure I didn't miss

957
01:12:09.600 --> 01:12:14.479
<v Speaker 1>super chats. Let me let make it back anyway. So

958
01:12:14.520 --> 01:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we're having a fun like again, let's get back to this.

959
01:12:16.680 --> 01:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Because they're like, the way they're gonna do this, they're

960
01:12:19.840 --> 01:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna play this is that they're gonna make all this smoke.

961
01:12:22.279 --> 01:12:24.479
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna make all this drama. They're gonna whine and bitch.

962
01:12:24.520 --> 01:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna talk about the actual issues. And they're

963
01:12:27.880 --> 01:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna they do. That's the last thing they wanted

964
01:12:29.800 --> 01:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to actually to be the issues, or else they would

965
01:12:31.720 --> 01:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>just hop on the crucible. We can we can sell

966
01:12:33.600 --> 01:12:36.399
<v Speaker 1>it right now. We can hop on the crucible. We

967
01:12:36.399 --> 01:12:40.119
<v Speaker 1>can pound it out through the entire night what the

968
01:12:40.199 --> 01:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>issues are. But I don't know, maybe leather Daddy here

969
01:12:46.880 --> 01:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>has got to go pound it out some other way.

970
01:12:49.800 --> 01:12:52.359
<v Speaker 6>I don't know of the apostles of the band of

971
01:12:52.399 --> 01:12:55.079
<v Speaker 6>the Apostles, that being Saint Peter. I think they tend

972
01:12:55.079 --> 01:12:56.520
<v Speaker 6>to forget that, and the fact.

973
01:12:56.319 --> 01:13:00.960
<v Speaker 9>That, well, you know, the officers bishop, well continue, We're

974
01:13:00.960 --> 01:13:04.159
<v Speaker 9>told directly next chapter one twenty when the office is

975
01:13:04.239 --> 01:13:06.600
<v Speaker 9>desolate of the bishop, it uses the Greek.

976
01:13:06.359 --> 01:13:09.399
<v Speaker 6>Episcopos or episcopy. I forget the exact Greek word there,

977
01:13:09.880 --> 01:13:15.840
<v Speaker 6>that will be fulfilled. He'll be filled. Yeah, Thus bishops continue,

978
01:13:16.520 --> 01:13:18.800
<v Speaker 6>and we realize that that's very clear.

979
01:13:18.880 --> 01:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>For Sam says that you have a lisp. I'm pretty

980
01:13:22.880 --> 01:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sure his leather daddy buddy has them the lisp of

981
01:13:25.800 --> 01:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>all lisps, and more of a lisp than James White.

982
01:13:28.720 --> 01:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lisp, by the way, So, uh,

983
01:13:31.479 --> 01:13:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Sam is copying my James White joke, which is funny.

984
01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Come up with your own jokes, dude.

985
01:13:38.359 --> 01:13:42.239
<v Speaker 6>Saint Peter, those that would follow him, and I've noticed

986
01:13:42.239 --> 01:13:45.760
<v Speaker 6>a tend to really, whether it be Evangelical or Orthodox,

987
01:13:46.119 --> 01:13:47.319
<v Speaker 6>tend and not understand.

988
01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:51.039
<v Speaker 4>That, you know, for those that say, as you mentioned there,

989
01:13:51.159 --> 01:13:53.880
<v Speaker 4>that okay, well, why do we need a Saint Peter,

990
01:13:53.960 --> 01:13:58.520
<v Speaker 4>why do we need a head it? My thing is

991
01:13:58.640 --> 01:14:01.359
<v Speaker 4>it's like saying why do you need a why do

992
01:14:01.359 --> 01:14:04.399
<v Speaker 4>you need a head on the body?

993
01:14:05.600 --> 01:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Again, In the Orthodox view, Christ is the head and

994
01:14:08.760 --> 01:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>he directly governs the church through the power of the

995
01:14:11.319 --> 01:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Holy Spirit. So we don't need an Old Testament high

996
01:14:15.079 --> 01:14:19.039
<v Speaker 1>priest earthly head because the Old Testament high priest office

997
01:14:19.479 --> 01:14:22.279
<v Speaker 1>in the New Testament is explicitly referenced and fulfilled in

998
01:14:22.319 --> 01:14:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the person of Christ. So Christ is quite literally the

999
01:14:26.479 --> 01:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>living head of the Church, and every bishop underneath Christ

1000
01:14:31.479 --> 01:14:35.279
<v Speaker 1>is another little head of the church, you see. But

1001
01:14:35.399 --> 01:14:39.359
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't follow from this analogy of head to body

1002
01:14:39.479 --> 01:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that there has to be an Old Testament high priest head.

1003
01:14:43.880 --> 01:14:47.079
<v Speaker 1>You see, when the high priest, as everyone knows via

1004
01:14:47.199 --> 01:14:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Hebrews Hebrew seven, is fulfilled in the person and the

1005
01:14:50.439 --> 01:14:56.079
<v Speaker 1>ascension of Christ. So the Roman Catholic position is actually

1006
01:14:56.199 --> 01:14:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a lack of faith in the power of the Holy

1007
01:14:59.199 --> 01:15:02.039
<v Speaker 1>Spirit to govern in the church. Now, an easy way

1008
01:15:02.039 --> 01:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to refute this is it's Benedict the sixteenth that admitted

1009
01:15:06.479 --> 01:15:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that the Orthodox Church has maintained the faith for the

1010
01:15:10.439 --> 01:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>last thousand years. It's a famous Benedict quote. Well, then

1011
01:15:16.720 --> 01:15:20.119
<v Speaker 1>we don't need the papacy to maintain the faith, you see.

1012
01:15:20.600 --> 01:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So the Orthodox confession that the Holy Spirit is the

1013
01:15:25.720 --> 01:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>governor and guiter of the Church. Thus we don't need

1014
01:15:29.640 --> 01:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the physical, literal, high, priestly judaic head of the church

1015
01:15:35.880 --> 01:15:39.239
<v Speaker 1>is proven by the admission of Benedict that the Orthodox

1016
01:15:39.319 --> 01:15:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Church has maintained the faith four thousand years about the pope.

1017
01:15:42.840 --> 01:15:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Body can't exist without a hey, it cannot, yes.

1018
01:15:46.960 --> 01:15:50.239
<v Speaker 1>But Christ is the head. So this false analogy does

1019
01:15:50.279 --> 01:15:54.119
<v Speaker 1>not prove that the Bishop of Rome is the vicar

1020
01:15:54.199 --> 01:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>of Christ on earth, the earthly head. It's just that's

1021
01:15:56.520 --> 01:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing in question, and it's not been proved so far.

1022
01:16:01.079 --> 01:16:04.319
<v Speaker 1>They've only really made a pragmatic argument the pope will

1023
01:16:04.319 --> 01:16:07.159
<v Speaker 1>provide unity and he can be ahead. But these are

1024
01:16:07.159 --> 01:16:08.319
<v Speaker 1>not good arguments so far.

1025
01:16:08.359 --> 01:16:10.479
<v Speaker 4>It seems like there does have to be that center

1026
01:16:11.079 --> 01:16:14.279
<v Speaker 4>of authority, the center of unity. Yet really even be

1027
01:16:14.279 --> 01:16:17.319
<v Speaker 4>able to identify a particular communion, you have to have that.

1028
01:16:17.960 --> 01:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that I don't know how if a

1029
01:16:22.680 --> 01:16:26.279
<v Speaker 1>center head of authority and unity is needed to recognize

1030
01:16:26.319 --> 01:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the church or to recognize that unity. How did any

1031
01:16:29.640 --> 01:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Christians who converted in the first, second, and third century

1032
01:16:32.880 --> 01:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>who didn't have access to Rome know the faith. Did

1033
01:16:36.720 --> 01:16:39.119
<v Speaker 1>they just go and say are you the church in

1034
01:16:39.159 --> 01:16:42.479
<v Speaker 1>commune with Rome, then you must be the true church.

1035
01:16:44.640 --> 01:16:47.279
<v Speaker 1>What if they didn't know anything about Rome? Like, do

1036
01:16:47.359 --> 01:16:50.319
<v Speaker 1>they actually think that all of the churches in the first, second,

1037
01:16:50.359 --> 01:16:55.199
<v Speaker 1>third century were catechizing people like Vatican One? And if

1038
01:16:55.199 --> 01:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they weren't, then they didn't need to know about the

1039
01:16:58.560 --> 01:17:02.319
<v Speaker 1>bishop bishopic of if they were converting in Jerusalem or

1040
01:17:02.319 --> 01:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>in Corinth or Ephesus or anywhere else. Do you see

1041
01:17:07.159 --> 01:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the point when you read the early catechetical lectures or

1042
01:17:11.560 --> 01:17:14.239
<v Speaker 1>when you read say, John Damascus is on the Orthodox faith?

1043
01:17:14.920 --> 01:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Why does John Damascus, a doctor of the Catholic Church,

1044
01:17:18.880 --> 01:17:22.039
<v Speaker 1>write an entire systematic theology with no reference to the

1045
01:17:22.079 --> 01:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>papist Here, Peter, he didn't recognize the obvious number one

1046
01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>rock center of the faith of the church when he

1047
01:17:30.800 --> 01:17:35.319
<v Speaker 1>wrote an entire systematic theology or did he just simply

1048
01:17:35.399 --> 01:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not have in his mind the Vatican One mindset? Like

1049
01:17:38.039 --> 01:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>these people do could.

1050
01:17:39.319 --> 01:17:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Function without Ahead? Now, yeah, what people will say is, well,

1051
01:17:42.680 --> 01:17:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Jesus is the head. What do you say, respondse, yeah, so.

1052
01:17:47.680 --> 01:17:51.760
<v Speaker 6>Without a doubt, we recognize Christ. It's ahead, We recognize

1053
01:17:51.840 --> 01:17:53.079
<v Speaker 6>Christ holds the key.

1054
01:17:53.960 --> 01:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Nobody says, but yeah, the Holy Spirit doesn't really do

1055
01:17:56.920 --> 01:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that good in governing the church. So we need the

1056
01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the Questak. We need the ruler of all rulers. We

1057
01:18:05.520 --> 01:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>need the king of kings.

1058
01:18:08.399 --> 01:18:08.880
<v Speaker 6>The Pope.

1059
01:18:09.800 --> 01:18:12.239
<v Speaker 1>You think when you're king of kings, you think it's Jesus. No, No,

1060
01:18:12.560 --> 01:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the Pope is the king of kings on earth. You see,

1061
01:18:15.119 --> 01:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>he has all temporal dominion and authority, and all kings

1062
01:18:22.279 --> 01:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>must submit and kiss his feet. The Pope alone, shall

1063
01:18:27.760 --> 01:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>all the princes of the world kiss his feet? Is

1064
01:18:30.840 --> 01:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>that what Jesus was setting up when he set up

1065
01:18:33.359 --> 01:18:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a church, which, by the way, they reference Chalcidon. The

1066
01:18:36.359 --> 01:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Canons of Chalcedon forbid any cleric from being a worldly

1067
01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>magistrate or a civil leader. No member of the clergy

1068
01:18:47.680 --> 01:18:52.279
<v Speaker 1>can be a prince or a magistrate of the state

1069
01:18:52.439 --> 01:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>because the separation of powers dictatus pape is a rejection

1070
01:18:56.880 --> 01:19:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of Chalcedon. Let's see Orthodox for nisis five dollars. It

1071
01:19:12.319 --> 01:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is not freeful to speak with Sam. He was spitting,

1072
01:19:14.960 --> 01:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>he was calling Orthodox dogs. He found old Theoria articles

1073
01:19:20.439 --> 01:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>against Orthodox ethos. So now he's mad at Father. Hears

1074
01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:36.039
<v Speaker 1>just losing it Sam Jordan and five dollars. Sam is

1075
01:19:36.119 --> 01:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>ending his stream. Now that the crucible people are offering

1076
01:19:38.399 --> 01:19:43.079
<v Speaker 1>a platform that's neutral. Of course, Nicholas two dollars, I

1077
01:19:43.159 --> 01:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just joined the stream. What's going on? I'm refuting the

1078
01:19:46.039 --> 01:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic position of Sam and Albrick. Two dollars. Sam,

1079
01:19:52.560 --> 01:19:58.039
<v Speaker 1>he won't call you. You're desperate for reviews. Yeah, I'm desperate

1080
01:19:58.039 --> 01:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for views and them on two dollars. Protestants need to

1081
01:20:02.680 --> 01:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>take a back seat. I already read that. Let's see

1082
01:20:11.359 --> 01:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Dre God the passport King ten dollars. This is a

1083
01:20:13.800 --> 01:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>rare currence where Muslims and Protestants are not part of

1084
01:20:16.680 --> 01:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>an insane clown show. Where's the cloud show? Other than

1085
01:20:20.680 --> 01:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like I'm actually I'm responding to the actual arguments Gray

1086
01:20:24.039 --> 01:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>stream Jay, this is dedicated to the papacy and it's

1087
01:20:27.439 --> 01:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>long overdue. Well, I've actually done a whole bunch of

1088
01:20:30.640 --> 01:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>papacy streams, oaklock something sks and d two dollars. Sam

1089
01:20:37.720 --> 01:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>said nothing but foul discussing things about you and all

1090
01:20:40.039 --> 01:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the Orthodox there you go, all because of one DM

1091
01:20:46.600 --> 01:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that I'm asking him to come and have a friendly exchange.

1092
01:20:49.600 --> 01:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That's it, that's it. That's what ignited all of this

1093
01:20:53.720 --> 01:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>because I disagreed with his take on Protestant and Catholic

1094
01:20:58.439 --> 01:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>models of the Trinity ISA eighty seven two dollars. Sam

1095
01:21:06.880 --> 01:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Chamun was indefensible tonight. What a shame. Yeah, retro reister

1096
01:21:13.880 --> 01:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>gaming five a's Jay God bless you mate, love your

1097
01:21:16.479 --> 01:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>channel shivalib get so and so on to debate with you.

1098
01:21:28.399 --> 01:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he wants to debate with me. This

1099
01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is not Tolsch Schamun. It's about somebody else. I don't

1100
01:21:32.880 --> 01:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think that guy's interested. But maybe we'll see Brent. Five dollars.

1101
01:21:37.039 --> 01:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>If anyone is manifesting anything, it is Sam Shimun Roman Catholics.

1102
01:21:40.920 --> 01:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>This is the fruit of your rotten church. This vindicates Orthodoxy. Unfortunately,

1103
01:21:46.279 --> 01:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this is verty big too. Five dollars. Sam said that

1104
01:21:49.720 --> 01:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you are a pure scum, you are the son of Satan.

1105
01:21:52.520 --> 01:21:53.119
<v Speaker 6>You are.

1106
01:21:54.800 --> 01:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Gay. I mean I'm married, he's not, so I don't

1107
01:22:01.840 --> 01:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make any sense. BLK and Sam and William

1108
01:22:07.920 --> 01:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>fell for a fake account and they thought it was

1109
01:22:09.840 --> 01:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>really you. This is one of the stupidest, our funniest

1110
01:22:12.880 --> 01:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>clips of the year, arguing.

1111
01:22:19.640 --> 01:22:19.840
<v Speaker 5>That but.

1112
01:22:21.359 --> 01:22:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Peter, Saint Peter is the vicarious rock that has got

1113
01:22:25.600 --> 01:22:30.319
<v Speaker 6>to be recognized Number one that takes nothing away from Christ.

1114
01:22:30.439 --> 01:22:32.520
<v Speaker 6>But the fact of the matter is, Michael, is that

1115
01:22:32.680 --> 01:22:36.800
<v Speaker 6>Christ set up a visible church with a visible hierarchy

1116
01:22:37.159 --> 01:22:39.119
<v Speaker 6>and invisible head.

1117
01:22:38.800 --> 01:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, but none of that, that's a non sequitor.

1118
01:22:41.840 --> 01:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>So the thing in question is whether Peter is the

1119
01:22:46.199 --> 01:22:50.039
<v Speaker 1>sole autocrat head of the church, and we haven't actually

1120
01:22:50.119 --> 01:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>heard a proof of that or a specific argument other

1121
01:22:54.920 --> 01:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>than practical appeals. Well, you need it for unity, but

1122
01:23:00.199 --> 01:23:03.039
<v Speaker 1>where's the evidence of that biblically, where's the evidence of

1123
01:23:03.079 --> 01:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that in the patristic sense, because we haven't had an

1124
01:23:06.399 --> 01:23:10.039
<v Speaker 1>actual argument for that. All we've had is well, Leo

1125
01:23:10.159 --> 01:23:14.279
<v Speaker 1>thought as Tom had authority, okay, but that's not ex cathedra,

1126
01:23:15.039 --> 01:23:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and it was investigated to see if it was in

1127
01:23:17.279 --> 01:23:20.319
<v Speaker 1>line with what Cyril taught. So we've not had much

1128
01:23:20.359 --> 01:23:21.319
<v Speaker 1>substance yet.

1129
01:23:21.239 --> 01:23:24.720
<v Speaker 6>When you kind of use that as a you know,

1130
01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.159
<v Speaker 6>fallback and say, well, you know, Price is a leader.

1131
01:23:28.319 --> 01:23:31.920
<v Speaker 6>We agree that the church has always agreed. But how

1132
01:23:32.039 --> 01:23:35.319
<v Speaker 6>is the visible hierarchy mentioned in scripture? And it's very

1133
01:23:35.319 --> 01:23:37.920
<v Speaker 6>clear how it is mentioned. We hearken in the Matthew

1134
01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:41.000
<v Speaker 6>chapter sixteen all the time, but there are other pastes

1135
01:23:41.119 --> 01:23:43.840
<v Speaker 6>Luke chapter twenty two, John.

1136
01:23:43.960 --> 01:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Twenty Let's look at Luke twenty two. And let's see

1137
01:23:47.920 --> 01:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>if anywhere in Luke twenty two we find anything equivalent

1138
01:23:51.760 --> 01:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to Vatican one, because it ain't there. So remember this

1139
01:23:58.760 --> 01:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>is proofs for the papacy from the premiere papists, leather

1140
01:24:06.520 --> 01:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Daddy Albrecht. Here, let's see where all Brett goes with.

1141
01:24:29.680 --> 01:24:34.319
<v Speaker 10>Us one Judge twenty one. And the language is very

1142
01:24:34.319 --> 01:24:37.159
<v Speaker 10>strong there. Saint Peter's were literally told in the Greek

1143
01:24:37.199 --> 01:24:40.119
<v Speaker 10>that he said, shepherd in a very special role.

1144
01:24:40.159 --> 01:24:41.039
<v Speaker 6>What kind of shepherd?

1145
01:24:43.159 --> 01:24:49.239
<v Speaker 1>All the apostles are called shepherds? Where is the special role? Right?

1146
01:24:49.399 --> 01:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>That's attributed to Vatican one's level of this? All right,

1147
01:24:55.800 --> 01:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so let's see what do you say, John twenty one.

1148
01:25:05.840 --> 01:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So we have the the denials of Peter, right, and

1149
01:25:14.039 --> 01:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>then Jesus is pointing out to Peter that even though

1150
01:25:19.079 --> 01:25:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you denied me those three times, I am forgiving you,

1151
01:25:23.039 --> 01:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and I am telling you and giving you this commission.

1152
01:25:27.680 --> 01:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Feed my lands, feed my tend my sheep, feed my sheep.

1153
01:25:35.960 --> 01:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Where in any of that which is a restitution, a

1154
01:25:40.079 --> 01:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of redemption for Peter's three denials? Where in any

1155
01:25:44.239 --> 01:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of that is the Vatican one claim that the Bishop

1156
01:25:48.840 --> 01:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of Rome exercises universal, temporal and spiritual power autocratically over

1157
01:25:55.760 --> 01:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the entire church. Where is that, Oh, because Jesus said,

1158
01:26:03.920 --> 01:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>ten my sheep. So you begin to see that the

1159
01:26:07.319 --> 01:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>entire presupposition of these people is to read into the

1160
01:26:13.840 --> 01:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>texts these bizarre, outlandish interpretations that have nothing to do

1161
01:26:18.680 --> 01:26:24.079
<v Speaker 1>with what's in the text. That actually progresses too. Dictatus

1162
01:26:24.079 --> 01:26:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Pope in ten ninety. You understand they have to defend

1163
01:26:27.079 --> 01:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>this because it's not just dictatas Pope. Unam simtem dogmatizes

1164
01:26:32.439 --> 01:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. A couple centuries later. The Roman Church

1165
01:26:41.479 --> 01:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>is founded by God alone. The Roman pontiff alone is universal.

1166
01:26:45.920 --> 01:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>He alone can depose and reinstate all bishops. Totally different ecclesiology.

1167
01:26:50.479 --> 01:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The first thousand years UH number nine. The pope alone,

1168
01:26:58.039 --> 01:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of all the princes in the world, shows his feet.

1169
01:27:02.199 --> 01:27:04.239
<v Speaker 1>The Pope's name is the only name in the world.

1170
01:27:04.960 --> 01:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The papacy is the only name that can be spoken

1171
01:27:06.920 --> 01:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>in the churches the Roman Church. The papacy is judged

1172
01:27:18.239 --> 01:27:25.279
<v Speaker 1>by no one and may be judged by no one.

1173
01:27:26.439 --> 01:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>So in ten ninety Dictatus Pape of Gregory the seventh

1174
01:27:30.840 --> 01:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>becomes the seeds for developing into unam sanctam in thirteen

1175
01:27:34.439 --> 01:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>oh two, which doesn't just say that you have to

1176
01:27:36.720 --> 01:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be in communion with the Bishop Rome to be saved.

1177
01:27:39.279 --> 01:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It says you must also believe in the full temper

1178
01:27:42.319 --> 01:27:45.279
<v Speaker 1>temporal power and supremacy the Roman bishop to be saved

1179
01:27:45.319 --> 01:27:49.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. And as we saw the Roman calogy church

1180
01:27:49.279 --> 01:27:52.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't teach that. Now, this is what these people are

1181
01:27:52.319 --> 01:27:59.319
<v Speaker 1>defending from Jesus telling Peter, feed my sheep. You can't

1182
01:27:59.359 --> 01:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>make this up. So Jesus saying feed my sheep literally

1183
01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:09.079
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to translate into a thousand years later. You

1184
01:28:09.159 --> 01:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>are the king of all the kings in the world.

1185
01:28:12.479 --> 01:28:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You should have standing armies, as the Medici popes did.

1186
01:28:22.479 --> 01:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ludicrous.

1187
01:28:24.960 --> 01:28:30.159
<v Speaker 6>Over the flock. Yeah, So my comment would be that

1188
01:28:30.479 --> 01:28:35.239
<v Speaker 6>we have got that chep, we have that business as lead,

1189
01:28:36.640 --> 01:28:38.960
<v Speaker 6>and my hope would be that all of these other

1190
01:28:39.039 --> 01:28:41.000
<v Speaker 6>churches have that as well. But in order to have

1191
01:28:41.039 --> 01:28:43.720
<v Speaker 6>that they would have to become Catholic. Those people would

1192
01:28:43.760 --> 01:28:44.960
<v Speaker 6>have to become Catholic.

1193
01:28:45.239 --> 01:28:48.199
<v Speaker 4>Some people would say, but okay, you know, I understand

1194
01:28:48.199 --> 01:28:52.840
<v Speaker 4>what you're saying. But it seems like Vatican One and

1195
01:28:52.920 --> 01:28:59.039
<v Speaker 4>its language and claims about the pope, it just seems anachronistic,

1196
01:28:59.119 --> 01:29:02.079
<v Speaker 4>they would claim. They would say that, look, this speaks

1197
01:29:02.119 --> 01:29:05.520
<v Speaker 4>about an authority to the papacy that just did not

1198
01:29:05.760 --> 01:29:08.840
<v Speaker 4>exist in the first millennium. What would you say to

1199
01:29:08.840 --> 01:29:11.680
<v Speaker 4>those who would claim that this kind of authority doesn't

1200
01:29:11.680 --> 01:29:12.760
<v Speaker 4>exist in the first millennium?

1201
01:29:12.840 --> 01:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, you mean the argument. You mean the argument

1202
01:29:16.880 --> 01:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that the papal document itself makes in eighty paragraph nineteen

1203
01:29:22.199 --> 01:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>appeals to the Bishop Rome from the East expressed the

1204
01:29:24.760 --> 01:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>community of the church, but the Bishop Rome did not

1205
01:29:26.680 --> 01:29:29.279
<v Speaker 1>exercise canonical authority of the Church of the East. You're

1206
01:29:29.319 --> 01:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about your papacies argument that this wasn't the case

1207
01:29:33.680 --> 01:29:36.119
<v Speaker 1>that it's admitted. Is that what you're talking about.

1208
01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:39.920
<v Speaker 6>One, even though it's very early on, you clearly have

1209
01:29:40.079 --> 01:29:43.279
<v Speaker 6>seeds of that in Pope Rome, without a doubt, where

1210
01:29:43.319 --> 01:29:46.520
<v Speaker 6>he's what he's talking when he's talking to the flock,

1211
01:29:46.880 --> 01:29:50.119
<v Speaker 6>he's doing it in the authoritative manner. He clearly views

1212
01:29:50.199 --> 01:29:52.760
<v Speaker 6>himself as that head of the church.

1213
01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>But no Clement of Rome, by the way, is no

1214
01:29:55.720 --> 01:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>longer even used by Roman Catholic apologists. And if you

1215
01:29:59.000 --> 01:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>read the the Sashensky book that just came out, there's

1216
01:30:02.720 --> 01:30:06.319
<v Speaker 1>an entire chapter on Clement on this very point, and

1217
01:30:06.399 --> 01:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>even the Roman Catholic world has ceased from trying to

1218
01:30:09.079 --> 01:30:12.279
<v Speaker 1>utilize Clement in that way. This is an older apologetic

1219
01:30:12.279 --> 01:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>approach that was popular maybe one hundred years ago, but

1220
01:30:15.079 --> 01:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fallen out of use because it doesn't really prove

1221
01:30:18.840 --> 01:30:21.479
<v Speaker 1>what the Roman Catholics wanted to prove. Right, So, if

1222
01:30:21.520 --> 01:30:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Clement writes a letter and says to a church far

1223
01:30:24.239 --> 01:30:27.119
<v Speaker 1>away that because he presides in love and he has

1224
01:30:27.119 --> 01:30:30.359
<v Speaker 1>these recommendations, none of that has anything to do with

1225
01:30:30.720 --> 01:30:34.239
<v Speaker 1>just like John twenty one, with the claims of vatican Ie.

1226
01:30:35.079 --> 01:30:39.239
<v Speaker 1>And so this is just like the classic low tier.

1227
01:30:39.399 --> 01:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like Catherine answers level quote mining that even Roman

1228
01:30:43.800 --> 01:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Catholics don't use anymore. So again, Sashensky's chapter on Clement

1229
01:30:47.920 --> 01:30:48.439
<v Speaker 1>disproves this.

1230
01:30:49.479 --> 01:30:52.159
<v Speaker 6>We go beyond. It's very clear in the language of

1231
01:30:52.199 --> 01:30:54.600
<v Speaker 6>seeing her in as that there is a certain model

1232
01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:57.399
<v Speaker 6>that is set up in a certain way. So if

1233
01:30:57.439 --> 01:31:00.439
<v Speaker 6>we look in early church history and we look at

1234
01:31:00.439 --> 01:31:02.880
<v Speaker 6>the claims of some of these popes, for instance, I

1235
01:31:02.960 --> 01:31:06.680
<v Speaker 6>brought up Pope Saint Pope Saint Leo the Great, and

1236
01:31:07.279 --> 01:31:12.079
<v Speaker 6>we go onward. Even at classic example, read the language

1237
01:31:12.119 --> 01:31:14.279
<v Speaker 6>of the second Council in Nicia.

1238
01:31:14.399 --> 01:31:18.520
<v Speaker 4>There's no way, very strong, right, and that's added agumenical council.

1239
01:31:18.520 --> 01:31:20.920
<v Speaker 6>That's this is very very strong.

1240
01:31:21.600 --> 01:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it did they not realize that the Pentarchy

1241
01:31:24.840 --> 01:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>had already been accepted at Nicia two, like prior even

1242
01:31:28.920 --> 01:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>prior to Nicia too, the Pentarchy had already been accepted.

1243
01:31:32.239 --> 01:31:35.359
<v Speaker 1>And flowery language, as we saw in the debate between

1244
01:31:35.520 --> 01:31:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Ibara and Ubi, doesn't again doesn't get you anywhere because

1245
01:31:39.319 --> 01:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the same flowery language is used of the emperor and

1246
01:31:42.640 --> 01:31:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the empress. For example, the emperor is called the he

1247
01:31:48.520 --> 01:31:53.159
<v Speaker 1>whom the gates of Hell cannot prevail against. Oh, so

1248
01:31:54.319 --> 01:31:57.079
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that he's equivalent to Peter? So in

1249
01:31:57.159 --> 01:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>other words, it's a double standard. Right, The same argument

1250
01:31:59.840 --> 01:32:03.399
<v Speaker 1>has brought forward when this was the point Luigi made

1251
01:32:04.399 --> 01:32:09.479
<v Speaker 1>to Voice of Reason. Right, So it's a double standard.

1252
01:32:09.520 --> 01:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So just because you see that flowery language like that,

1253
01:32:12.239 --> 01:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll pick and choose and they'll say, well, when it's

1254
01:32:14.680 --> 01:32:17.359
<v Speaker 1>used of the emperor, it doesn't count. But when it's

1255
01:32:17.439 --> 01:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>used to the Bishop Rome, that's the only time it counts.

1256
01:32:19.680 --> 01:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a double standard.

1257
01:32:22.359 --> 01:32:25.640
<v Speaker 6>Incredibly strong. So if we have that kind of language,

1258
01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:28.880
<v Speaker 6>this is fort millennium. Uh, this is the first millennium.

1259
01:32:29.119 --> 01:32:31.920
<v Speaker 6>And if we have that kind of language there, the

1260
01:32:32.039 --> 01:32:35.399
<v Speaker 6>Church is agreeing upon that kind of language, then there

1261
01:32:35.479 --> 01:32:37.239
<v Speaker 6>is a foundation.

1262
01:32:38.600 --> 01:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a non sequitor. So because the first the

1263
01:32:42.880 --> 01:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>flowery language is there in some of these examples, which

1264
01:32:45.840 --> 01:32:50.039
<v Speaker 1>is selectively chosen to ignore the flowery language that's said

1265
01:32:50.119 --> 01:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>identically of the emperor. By the way, I understand, I'm

1266
01:32:52.560 --> 01:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>not arguing that the emperor is the bastion of the

1267
01:32:56.560 --> 01:32:59.279
<v Speaker 1>gates of Hell, right, I'm not arguing that the emperor

1268
01:33:00.199 --> 01:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is what will keep the church from falling to the

1269
01:33:02.640 --> 01:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gates of Hell. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying

1270
01:33:04.720 --> 01:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the same phraseology is used of the Emperor, and the

1271
01:33:08.880 --> 01:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholics ignore it because it doesn't fit their model

1272
01:33:12.800 --> 01:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and their usage, because they would then have to admit

1273
01:33:15.920 --> 01:33:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that there's flowery language that's used a lot in those centuries.

1274
01:33:19.680 --> 01:33:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you another example. If you read Basil's letters,

1275
01:33:23.760 --> 01:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>when he talks about how Rome was useless in the

1276
01:33:27.640 --> 01:33:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Malitian Schism, when he refers to the Church of Antioch,

1277
01:33:31.960 --> 01:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Basil says, Antioch the head of the church, the head

1278
01:33:35.720 --> 01:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>from which the body desires and seeks its knowledge and

1279
01:33:39.800 --> 01:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's whatever all this flowery language, nobody believes the Church

1280
01:33:43.920 --> 01:33:47.279
<v Speaker 1>of Antioch is the head of the Church. You have

1281
01:33:47.359 --> 01:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the same language in Pope Saint Gregory the Great where

1282
01:33:49.760 --> 01:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he calls the See of Peter Rome, Alexandria and Antioch

1283
01:33:54.039 --> 01:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as late as Pope Saint Gregory the Great. So that

1284
01:33:56.880 --> 01:33:59.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fit their model though, you see, because they have

1285
01:33:59.279 --> 01:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a selective usage where they pull out the quote that

1286
01:34:02.600 --> 01:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>fits the model, ignore the contrary evidence, not to mention

1287
01:34:07.600 --> 01:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the contradictions against the Vatican One idea of indefectibility, like

1288
01:34:12.520 --> 01:34:16.479
<v Speaker 1>popeias or a pope being deposed. They'll set that aside

1289
01:34:16.479 --> 01:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for a minute. That's ignored because what's useful is the selective,

1290
01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>flowery language that fits the narrative of Vatican One being

1291
01:34:24.840 --> 01:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>read retroactively into these passages.

1292
01:34:29.079 --> 01:34:34.239
<v Speaker 6>We love them and the orient Orthodoxy, and they're gonna say, hey, well,

1293
01:34:34.239 --> 01:34:36.359
<v Speaker 6>we weren't there at and I see it too, so

1294
01:34:36.439 --> 01:34:39.199
<v Speaker 6>what about us. So the way to answer that, in

1295
01:34:39.239 --> 01:34:43.960
<v Speaker 6>my opinion, is to look at beforehand. Sure, and if

1296
01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:45.920
<v Speaker 6>you look at beforehand, if you look at in the

1297
01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:49.199
<v Speaker 6>Syriac fathers, they have strong language when they talk about

1298
01:34:49.239 --> 01:34:52.359
<v Speaker 6>the papacy as well. And there's look, Michael, there's no

1299
01:34:52.439 --> 01:34:54.880
<v Speaker 6>way around the language of the Bible. Yeah, it's very

1300
01:34:54.920 --> 01:34:57.319
<v Speaker 6>clear the model that is laid out there, and that

1301
01:34:57.359 --> 01:35:00.439
<v Speaker 6>model is at very clear of the papacy the way

1302
01:35:00.479 --> 01:35:01.840
<v Speaker 6>the Captain Church points it up.

1303
01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Now, come on, So far we've heard Matthew sixteen, we've

1304
01:35:07.359 --> 01:35:11.199
<v Speaker 1>heard Luke twenty one about the Luke twenty two about

1305
01:35:11.239 --> 01:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the denials, and John twenty one about feed my flock.

1306
01:35:18.359 --> 01:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>That's all we've heard. And he just says the papacy's clear.

1307
01:35:24.439 --> 01:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You haven't demonstrated anything from Vatican one in the Bible,

1308
01:35:29.319 --> 01:35:31.439
<v Speaker 1>nor have you demonstrated anything for Vatican one in the

1309
01:35:31.479 --> 01:35:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Patristic text yet. And by the way, you've not addressed

1310
01:35:34.479 --> 01:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>any of the objections either.

1311
01:35:35.640 --> 01:35:38.640
<v Speaker 6>By the way, nobody I mean, I mean.

1312
01:35:38.600 --> 01:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Like Honorius, Virgilius, et cetera, which are classic problem texts

1313
01:35:43.600 --> 01:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>for the papists. And let me remind you of Ybarra mmh.

1314
01:36:01.439 --> 01:36:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Let me see it definitely, So try to pull up.

1315
01:36:15.720 --> 01:36:21.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I'm logged in, I could say

1316
01:36:21.479 --> 01:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>what the hell was that? IM trying to find my clip.

1317
01:36:25.960 --> 01:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if it's on X. See if we can

1318
01:36:31.479 --> 01:36:34.760
<v Speaker 1>find it over here. You'll see why I'm pulling this up.

1319
01:37:20.239 --> 01:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>There's a clip I uploaded where Abara doesn't have an

1320
01:37:24.399 --> 01:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>answer and the freaking search on here is terrible.

1321
01:37:33.079 --> 01:37:45.439
<v Speaker 11>It's on my TikTok. Let me just play it this way.

1322
01:37:46.159 --> 01:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna show from Ibarra, who's far better than

1323
01:37:50.399 --> 01:38:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Albrecht at this point, how bad the augmentation is here. Okay,

1324
01:38:12.159 --> 01:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>here we go, who.

1325
01:38:13.840 --> 01:38:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Never departed from the traditions of the fathers and directed

1326
01:38:17.279 --> 01:38:19.239
<v Speaker 2>the Church of God in utter tranquility.

1327
01:38:20.319 --> 01:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's correct? Not literally?

1328
01:38:23.199 --> 01:38:23.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1329
01:38:24.319 --> 01:38:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh so wait a minute. So we have a quote,

1330
01:38:26.199 --> 01:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>a patristic quote that this certain situation, I can't remember

1331
01:38:31.279 --> 01:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's talking about the emperor or what, but it's

1332
01:38:33.960 --> 01:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>saying that this bishopric or this in this situation, they

1333
01:38:37.760 --> 01:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>always kept to the faith and never departed. Right. So

1334
01:38:40.520 --> 01:38:44.079
<v Speaker 1>this is the same language that's used in the ballet

1335
01:38:44.159 --> 01:38:44.720
<v Speaker 1>or Bagatho.

1336
01:38:44.920 --> 01:38:45.079
<v Speaker 6>Right.

1337
01:38:45.960 --> 01:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So I understand that Ubi's making the argument to a

1338
01:38:48.640 --> 01:38:53.039
<v Speaker 1>borrow that flowery language, even in your view, doesn't prove

1339
01:38:53.239 --> 01:38:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the papacy, because you admit, when the flowery language of

1340
01:38:57.560 --> 01:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>never departing from the faith is used of the emperor

1341
01:38:59.880 --> 01:39:02.119
<v Speaker 1>or of the other bishoprics, it doesn't count.

1342
01:39:02.439 --> 01:39:05.680
<v Speaker 2>You hear that who never departed from the traditions of

1343
01:39:05.720 --> 01:39:09.119
<v Speaker 2>the fathers and directed the Church of God in ultra tranquility.

1344
01:39:10.279 --> 01:39:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's correct?

1345
01:39:12.239 --> 01:39:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Not literally? Oh, flower, language doesn't automatically prove it. Let's

1346
01:39:16.199 --> 01:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>see where this goes. It's not literally correct, but when

1347
01:39:20.960 --> 01:39:26.199
<v Speaker 1>the papacy works for the Roman Catholic it's literally correct.

1348
01:39:27.159 --> 01:39:29.560
<v Speaker 2>By the mid fifth century, how many popes have had

1349
01:39:29.800 --> 01:39:31.800
<v Speaker 2>like heretical views.

1350
01:39:33.600 --> 01:39:37.079
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, this is a hotly debated issue. So, I mean,

1351
01:39:37.119 --> 01:39:40.039
<v Speaker 12>there's questions related to the pontificate of.

1352
01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Liberius and Felix.

1353
01:39:43.119 --> 01:39:45.399
<v Speaker 12>But you know there's there's both sides.

1354
01:39:45.479 --> 01:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Theodora. Oh so wait a minute, the papacy has

1355
01:39:50.439 --> 01:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>had heterodox people in its chair. What about that doctrine

1356
01:39:56.840 --> 01:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>called indefectibility. I'm pretty sure there was a promise of indefectibility.

1357
01:40:01.720 --> 01:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the Vatican One mindset and ethos of

1358
01:40:06.039 --> 01:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what the papacy is. Well, you understand the pope is

1359
01:40:09.760 --> 01:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>indefectible until he defects. That's literally the Romaicelli position. And

1360
01:40:13.279 --> 01:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you just heard admit that.

1361
01:40:15.399 --> 01:40:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Mention this letter. Yes, for that Holy see speaking rom

1362
01:40:20.239 --> 01:40:23.640
<v Speaker 2>has precedence over all churches in the world for many reasons,

1363
01:40:23.680 --> 01:40:26.119
<v Speaker 2>and above all for this that is free from any

1364
01:40:26.159 --> 01:40:30.239
<v Speaker 2>taint of heresy, and that no bishop of heterodox's opinion

1365
01:40:30.319 --> 01:40:33.800
<v Speaker 2>has ever sat upon its throne, but has kept the

1366
01:40:33.800 --> 01:40:37.600
<v Speaker 2>grace of the apostles undefiled. Do you think he's correct?

1367
01:40:37.680 --> 01:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so that's pretty strong, flowery language.

1368
01:40:41.399 --> 01:40:46.239
<v Speaker 12>Uh oh, unless he elsewhere condemns another pope.

1369
01:40:46.720 --> 01:40:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So, as you mentioned, maybe he didn't know. I mean,

1370
01:40:48.880 --> 01:40:50.720
<v Speaker 2>he's out in the sounds like he's out in the

1371
01:40:50.720 --> 01:40:55.960
<v Speaker 2>boondocks when he riots, I can the constitutions of the

1372
01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:56.920
<v Speaker 2>church be destroyed?

1373
01:40:58.640 --> 01:41:01.479
<v Speaker 12>Constitution, the police, You're just done through the churches, right?

1374
01:41:01.479 --> 01:41:03.079
<v Speaker 2>And these guys are talking about when the Holy spirits

1375
01:41:03.119 --> 01:41:06.119
<v Speaker 2>down through the church is always, always, always, so I mean, okay,

1376
01:41:06.159 --> 01:41:09.199
<v Speaker 2>so in one case remaining, oh thank you. So in

1377
01:41:09.239 --> 01:41:13.159
<v Speaker 2>this case, I mean, when taking too account that there

1378
01:41:13.199 --> 01:41:16.159
<v Speaker 2>had been heretical popes, I mean, I don't see how

1379
01:41:16.199 --> 01:41:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you can maintain that the always there should be the exception.

1380
01:41:19.039 --> 01:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't know. So oh, always the papacy was

1381
01:41:24.039 --> 01:41:26.119
<v Speaker 1>always the rock and never taught error.

1382
01:41:26.720 --> 01:41:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, And these guys are talking about, with the

1383
01:41:28.399 --> 01:41:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Holy spirits down through the church is always, always, always.

1384
01:41:31.039 --> 01:41:33.920
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, okay, so in one case remaining, oh

1385
01:41:33.960 --> 01:41:38.279
<v Speaker 2>thank you. So in this case, I mean, when taking

1386
01:41:38.319 --> 01:41:40.479
<v Speaker 2>too account that there had been heretical popes, I mean,

1387
01:41:41.239 --> 01:41:43.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't see how you can maintain that they always

1388
01:41:43.439 --> 01:41:44.680
<v Speaker 2>there should be the exception.

1389
01:41:44.880 --> 01:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't know.

1390
01:41:45.520 --> 01:41:49.239
<v Speaker 12>I mean, look, I believe Honorius was a condemned heretic.

1391
01:41:49.520 --> 01:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh so the papacy isn't indefectible. It's indefectible until it defects.

1392
01:41:57.600 --> 01:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>So you understand that the bar right there denied the

1393
01:42:00.239 --> 01:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>indefectibility of the Roman See do you.

1394
01:42:02.920 --> 01:42:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Think in the case of Saint Silverius, he was deposed

1395
01:42:06.680 --> 01:42:09.960
<v Speaker 2>by bel Sorrus, He's sent to Justinian, finds out says

1396
01:42:10.319 --> 01:42:12.680
<v Speaker 2>you have to give a guy trial. He's handed over

1397
01:42:12.920 --> 01:42:18.159
<v Speaker 2>to Virgilius. Virgilious he was a horrible person. I don't

1398
01:42:18.159 --> 01:42:20.439
<v Speaker 2>know when sounds of it, He's horrible. I mean, how

1399
01:42:20.439 --> 01:42:22.560
<v Speaker 2>does that work out? If Virgilius is the pope, but

1400
01:42:22.600 --> 01:42:24.880
<v Speaker 2>he's judging a former pope. That means that the deposition

1401
01:42:24.920 --> 01:42:28.159
<v Speaker 2>of the former pope had to be valid if Virgilius

1402
01:42:28.199 --> 01:42:31.600
<v Speaker 2>is a pope. If if the deposition is not invalid

1403
01:42:31.960 --> 01:42:34.119
<v Speaker 2>and Virgilius is judging him, then you still have the

1404
01:42:34.119 --> 01:42:36.359
<v Speaker 2>situation of a pope being judged by non pope.

1405
01:42:36.920 --> 01:42:39.279
<v Speaker 12>I'll be candid with you, this is something that I

1406
01:42:39.479 --> 01:42:42.600
<v Speaker 12>have not really had a satisfactory answer to.

1407
01:42:43.359 --> 01:42:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Oh so when we have the real hardcore problems the

1408
01:42:47.079 --> 01:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>top apologist, I don't know, man, I don't have the answer.

1409
01:42:50.960 --> 01:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's Abara, who's way more advanced than this goofball

1410
01:42:55.319 --> 01:42:56.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know the answer.

1411
01:42:57.239 --> 01:43:01.600
<v Speaker 6>That the way the papacy looks at the time, they're

1412
01:43:01.640 --> 01:43:04.399
<v Speaker 6>not saying, well, the papacy has to look like this. Yeah,

1413
01:43:04.439 --> 01:43:07.279
<v Speaker 6>in the one hundreds, the church has been persecuted. You know,

1414
01:43:07.640 --> 01:43:09.960
<v Speaker 6>the church has developed, doctrine has developed.

1415
01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no argument about Oh so wait a minute, now,

1416
01:43:12.720 --> 01:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>remember Vatican One Pastor attornis uh uh satist cognitium. They

1417
01:43:19.760 --> 01:43:24.439
<v Speaker 1>actually argue that the prerogatives and the powers of the

1418
01:43:24.520 --> 01:43:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Roman bishop were always there and always known and recognized

1419
01:43:28.279 --> 01:43:32.840
<v Speaker 1>by the rest of the church from the earliest days. Well,

1420
01:43:32.840 --> 01:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but it is persecuted, so it's not really there. You

1421
01:43:35.600 --> 01:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>don't really see it. They're not able to do it,

1422
01:43:39.039 --> 01:43:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and it develops. So wait a minute, is it always

1423
01:43:42.199 --> 01:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>there and clear from the earliest days? According to the

1424
01:43:46.439 --> 01:43:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Vatican one and Lee the thirteenth people teaching or was

1425
01:43:49.760 --> 01:43:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it not clear? And it developed over time into unum

1426
01:43:53.399 --> 01:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>sanctum and the pope is the king of kings and

1427
01:43:57.319 --> 01:44:01.439
<v Speaker 1>has a bank run by the roth Charles the Battican Bank.

1428
01:44:01.760 --> 01:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Which one is it? Is it a development or was

1429
01:44:03.920 --> 01:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it always there? Those are mutual exclusive claims.

1430
01:44:06.920 --> 01:44:11.560
<v Speaker 6>You see doctrine developing. It is not the same thing

1431
01:44:11.680 --> 01:44:14.960
<v Speaker 6>as saying that doctrine has been created and there is

1432
01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:17.159
<v Speaker 6>no example of this his Oh really?

1433
01:44:17.279 --> 01:44:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1434
01:44:17.720 --> 01:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>What about the idea that the Roman bishop has full

1435
01:44:22.159 --> 01:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>temporal authority over all kings and it is himself a

1436
01:44:25.720 --> 01:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>king of kings. And if you don't believe that, your

1437
01:44:29.520 --> 01:44:33.680
<v Speaker 1>dannd where in the first thousand years is there a

1438
01:44:33.760 --> 01:44:37.439
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of that? You must believe in the temporal supremacy

1439
01:44:37.439 --> 01:44:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Roman Bishop to be saved. Oh, it doesn't exist.

1440
01:44:40.359 --> 01:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>That refused the very thing he just said.

1441
01:44:43.880 --> 01:44:47.039
<v Speaker 4>You know, the unfolding of the doctrine in industry is

1442
01:44:47.039 --> 01:44:49.840
<v Speaker 4>another thing too. So it's a good point. You bring

1443
01:44:49.920 --> 01:44:52.239
<v Speaker 4>up the wordy in orthodox A. Yeah, well they do

1444
01:44:52.319 --> 01:44:56.439
<v Speaker 4>accept ephesisure. What's interesting there is you have at emphasis

1445
01:44:56.880 --> 01:45:00.279
<v Speaker 4>Phillip the leg at the representative of the Pope making

1446
01:45:00.279 --> 01:45:03.159
<v Speaker 4>some pretty serious claims in front of the Council fathers

1447
01:45:03.520 --> 01:45:06.279
<v Speaker 4>about the Bishop of Rome. That is really the seeds

1448
01:45:06.279 --> 01:45:09.000
<v Speaker 4>of Vatican Willing in my estimation, Yeah, no doubt he

1449
01:45:09.159 --> 01:45:10.239
<v Speaker 4>makes them openly.

1450
01:45:10.479 --> 01:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh so wait a minute, remember Vatican I and post

1451
01:45:13.720 --> 01:45:17.039
<v Speaker 1>returners in Scatheast Cognito teach that the powers and prerogatives

1452
01:45:17.039 --> 01:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of the Roman bishop were always there from the earliest days,

1453
01:45:19.319 --> 01:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>recognized by all. But now we have at ephesis the

1454
01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:26.720
<v Speaker 1>seeds of the papacy. So understand that when you admit

1455
01:45:26.960 --> 01:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that these doctrines and these ecclesiology type structures evolve, you're

1456
01:45:32.960 --> 01:45:38.760
<v Speaker 1>admitting the evolution of doctrine, which allows for a position

1457
01:45:39.039 --> 01:45:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of in nineteen twenty eight condemning interfaith gatherings to nineteen

1458
01:45:45.399 --> 01:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight, sixty nine, seventy. Now it's the work of

1459
01:45:47.960 --> 01:45:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the Holy Spirit. If doctrine evolves, the Holy Spirit can

1460
01:45:51.159 --> 01:45:54.439
<v Speaker 1>contradict himself followers accepted.

1461
01:45:54.840 --> 01:45:58.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, there's no doubt about that. So you bring

1462
01:45:58.359 --> 01:46:01.479
<v Speaker 6>up a very good example there, because the church is

1463
01:46:01.520 --> 01:46:05.560
<v Speaker 6>not broken off at that time in emphasis. So to me,

1464
01:46:06.520 --> 01:46:09.800
<v Speaker 6>the best that they can do is try to claim

1465
01:46:09.840 --> 01:46:11.840
<v Speaker 6>that maybe later on that that wasn't accepted. It was

1466
01:46:11.880 --> 01:46:14.680
<v Speaker 6>accepted there though there was no doubt about it. There

1467
01:46:14.720 --> 01:46:17.000
<v Speaker 6>is no doubt that it was accepted there.

1468
01:46:17.079 --> 01:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So what do we But again, the flowery language or

1469
01:46:21.560 --> 01:46:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the strong language of legates at Ephesus, this comes up

1470
01:46:25.279 --> 01:46:30.119
<v Speaker 1>in the I think it was the Yeah, let's remind

1471
01:46:30.159 --> 01:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody of this classic. Right, So the the translator of

1472
01:46:35.720 --> 01:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>these texts, right, they had him on reason and theology,

1473
01:46:41.760 --> 01:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Father Price, right, So let's remind these two people in

1474
01:46:47.079 --> 01:46:50.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of the source that they're going to Richard Price.

1475
01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>What does Richard Price say about this argument of Chalcedon

1476
01:46:57.199 --> 01:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and Ephesus. Let's see what he says, because he doesn't

1477
01:46:59.800 --> 01:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>say what they say, but he's who they rely on.

1478
01:47:02.760 --> 01:47:03.079
<v Speaker 1>What's this?

1479
01:47:10.880 --> 01:47:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Why did the bishops in Calcidon feel they needed to

1480
01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:17.560
<v Speaker 4>judge THEODOREA if Leo had already reinstated him.

1481
01:47:18.159 --> 01:47:28.800
<v Speaker 13>Oh, well they didn't. They didn't recognize Roman jurisdiction in

1482
01:47:28.840 --> 01:47:30.239
<v Speaker 13>the eastern provinces.

1483
01:47:30.239 --> 01:47:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Whoa you?

1484
01:47:31.680 --> 01:47:36.920
<v Speaker 13>So there's reinstating for them was not decisive. The decision

1485
01:47:37.039 --> 01:47:51.119
<v Speaker 13>has to be made in the east. The the Odora's

1486
01:47:51.119 --> 01:47:55.119
<v Speaker 13>position at the council is an interesting one. Uh when

1487
01:47:55.319 --> 01:47:56.880
<v Speaker 13>the uh.

1488
01:47:57.399 --> 01:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So you see why this was not what they wanted

1489
01:48:00.079 --> 01:48:04.079
<v Speaker 1>on this stream. They invited Richard Price On who translated

1490
01:48:04.239 --> 01:48:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the Ecumenical Council acts in the sessions and all that, right,

1491
01:48:09.439 --> 01:48:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and they got a question that didn't fit their made

1492
01:48:12.800 --> 01:48:17.800
<v Speaker 1>up narrative. Right. And Richard Price is admitting, because he's

1493
01:48:17.920 --> 01:48:21.199
<v Speaker 1>enough of a scholar and he's honest with the texts,

1494
01:48:21.319 --> 01:48:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that the East didn't care about Roman authority and the

1495
01:48:25.920 --> 01:48:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Roman bishop in some sort of unilateral way. It's the

1496
01:48:29.359 --> 01:48:33.119
<v Speaker 1>exact same thing that Rome's eighty document says right here

1497
01:48:33.119 --> 01:48:36.439
<v Speaker 1>in paragraph nineteen. The Bishop of Rome did not exercise

1498
01:48:36.520 --> 01:48:39.199
<v Speaker 1>canonical authority over the churches of the East. Let's hear

1499
01:48:39.239 --> 01:48:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Father Richard Price again, the very guy that these guys

1500
01:48:43.119 --> 01:48:43.760
<v Speaker 1>rely upon.

1501
01:48:44.279 --> 01:48:48.039
<v Speaker 4>You understand, the bishops and calcid On feel they needed

1502
01:48:48.039 --> 01:48:55.279
<v Speaker 4>to judge Theodora if Leo had already reinstated him.

1503
01:48:55.520 --> 01:49:03.039
<v Speaker 13>Well they didn't, for they didn't recognize Roman jurisdiction in

1504
01:49:03.079 --> 01:49:04.560
<v Speaker 13>the Eastern provinces.

1505
01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh oops, doesn't fit the narrative. Just ignore it.

1506
01:49:08.880 --> 01:49:11.720
<v Speaker 6>Talk about the orient Orthodox. That to me is a

1507
01:49:11.800 --> 01:49:16.960
<v Speaker 6>problem for them because they reject the papacy. But it

1508
01:49:17.039 --> 01:49:20.680
<v Speaker 6>becomes an even greater problem for the Eastern Orthodox because

1509
01:49:20.720 --> 01:49:23.680
<v Speaker 6>we have so many examples, especially at the Second Council

1510
01:49:23.720 --> 01:49:27.079
<v Speaker 6>of Nicea, and this is what I would.

1511
01:49:26.840 --> 01:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Ask Before he goes into this, I should point out

1512
01:49:30.039 --> 01:49:34.119
<v Speaker 1>that from the Orthodox perspective, the power and prerogatives of

1513
01:49:34.159 --> 01:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Roman bishop are something that unfortunately evolved. So I'm

1514
01:49:39.800 --> 01:49:44.760
<v Speaker 1>not saying that actual theology develops. I'm saying that the

1515
01:49:44.800 --> 01:49:48.079
<v Speaker 1>power and prerogatives of the Roman bishop developed over time,

1516
01:49:48.199 --> 01:49:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and you do get stronger and stronger statements about the

1517
01:49:51.560 --> 01:49:54.479
<v Speaker 1>power and prerogatives of the Roman bishop. So even by

1518
01:49:54.520 --> 01:49:57.079
<v Speaker 1>the time of the Seventh Ecumenical Council, when they had

1519
01:49:57.079 --> 01:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>already accepted pentarchy, you tell that to a Roman calogy,

1520
01:50:00.039 --> 01:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they think that you're making that up. They don't even

1521
01:50:01.720 --> 01:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>realize that their own popes accepted the pentarchical structure by

1522
01:50:06.920 --> 01:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the time of the sixth and seventh Council. They're assuming

1523
01:50:10.960 --> 01:50:15.439
<v Speaker 1>that the statement from the Bishop of Rome necessarily makes it.

1524
01:50:15.520 --> 01:50:15.600
<v Speaker 3>So.

1525
01:50:16.039 --> 01:50:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, that would only be true if the Roman Catholic

1526
01:50:19.960 --> 01:50:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Vatican One position was true, which is the thing in question.

1527
01:50:22.840 --> 01:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So you notice, because these people are evidentialists and they're

1528
01:50:26.760 --> 01:50:30.119
<v Speaker 1>very sort of low tier, not very sophisticated when it

1529
01:50:30.119 --> 01:50:33.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to epistemology. They just assume that you just quote

1530
01:50:33.800 --> 01:50:36.239
<v Speaker 1>mine and pick out the evidences, and if you stack

1531
01:50:36.359 --> 01:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>up enough evidences, then it ninety two percent proves maybe

1532
01:50:40.640 --> 01:50:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the papacy in its seed form. But that's misunderstanding the

1533
01:50:46.239 --> 01:50:50.439
<v Speaker 1>paradigm question here. From the Orthodox paradigm, just because the

1534
01:50:50.520 --> 01:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Roman bishop starts accruing to himself more and more power,

1535
01:50:54.319 --> 01:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>which you clearly see in when I'm signed them and

1536
01:50:57.159 --> 01:51:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Dictatus Pope, it doesn't mean that it's good or necessarily so.

1537
01:51:02.840 --> 01:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>From the Orthodox perspective, the Bishop of Rome is like

1538
01:51:06.039 --> 01:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>any other bishop. He can be a heretic. You've heard

1539
01:51:08.960 --> 01:51:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Ibara admit that there were heretic popes. There's no special

1540
01:51:13.279 --> 01:51:19.479
<v Speaker 1>prerogative that makes that guy immune to these problems. So

1541
01:51:19.600 --> 01:51:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the fact that a pope, as we get into the seventh, eighth,

1542
01:51:23.199 --> 01:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and ninth century, makes more outlandish claims, makes more outlandish

1543
01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:32.399
<v Speaker 1>temporal power claims, doesn't prove anything other than that you're

1544
01:51:32.399 --> 01:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>just presupposing the papal position. But they don't actually think

1545
01:51:37.880 --> 01:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that way, right. They think that if the pope has

1546
01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:45.159
<v Speaker 1>more and more outlandish claims, that proves the papacy. Well,

1547
01:51:45.239 --> 01:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>only if the papacy in the Vatican One position is true.

1548
01:51:48.159 --> 01:51:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that the case, But that's the thing in question.

1549
01:51:51.880 --> 01:51:55.800
<v Speaker 6>Which church most resembles that church of the second Coast

1550
01:51:55.840 --> 01:51:57.399
<v Speaker 6>of nice in language?

1551
01:51:57.840 --> 01:52:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And oh, really, you're sure you want to go that route?

1552
01:52:00.680 --> 01:52:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Because the Second Council of Nicea is about icons, and

1553
01:52:04.960 --> 01:52:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the iconographic theology of that council lays down patterns and

1554
01:52:09.720 --> 01:52:14.720
<v Speaker 1>structures that are not allowable outside of the canons of

1555
01:52:14.720 --> 01:52:18.359
<v Speaker 1>what's appropriate for worship. In fact, there's a council that

1556
01:52:18.520 --> 01:52:23.000
<v Speaker 1>reaffirms Nicea two in eight forty three. It's called the

1557
01:52:23.039 --> 01:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Triumph of Orthodoxy in the East because it's the final

1558
01:52:26.960 --> 01:52:31.119
<v Speaker 1>victory of Nicea two over the Iconoclasts, and that produces

1559
01:52:31.159 --> 01:52:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a gigantic document called the Sonoticon, which condemns all kinds

1560
01:52:35.640 --> 01:52:42.199
<v Speaker 1>of things, including the outlandish violations of worship and errors

1561
01:52:42.279 --> 01:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>in the Roman Catholic system. Eventually, this develops in a

1562
01:52:46.439 --> 01:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lower D sense of developed. I don't mean that the

1563
01:52:49.039 --> 01:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>doctrine change, but I'm saying that canon law is the

1564
01:52:51.680 --> 01:52:56.039
<v Speaker 1>application of the principles at different times and in different ways.

1565
01:52:56.279 --> 01:52:59.319
<v Speaker 1>For us, canon law can be flexible. It has to

1566
01:52:59.359 --> 01:53:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be can't be immutable. There has to be changes and

1567
01:53:03.239 --> 01:53:08.399
<v Speaker 1>applications of canon law because cities go away. Times change.

1568
01:53:08.399 --> 01:53:11.920
<v Speaker 1>For example, you have canons that say that clergy can't

1569
01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>ride on a horse, right, eventually clergy can ride horses

1570
01:53:17.720 --> 01:53:20.319
<v Speaker 1>because we don't have nobility anymore. So horse riding was

1571
01:53:20.359 --> 01:53:23.239
<v Speaker 1>something for the nobility, and priests weren't supposed to be

1572
01:53:23.319 --> 01:53:26.359
<v Speaker 1>engaging in the actions of a civil servant and the nobility.

1573
01:53:26.760 --> 01:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's why that canon was there. So canons are

1574
01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a tricky thing because they're not necessarily infallible or immutable

1575
01:53:34.039 --> 01:53:38.279
<v Speaker 1>or eternal. Their applications of the principles of divine revelation

1576
01:53:38.399 --> 01:53:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to the time and to the place. And I don't

1577
01:53:40.680 --> 01:53:43.159
<v Speaker 1>think anybody believes that unless they're sort of crazy, that

1578
01:53:43.600 --> 01:53:46.119
<v Speaker 1>all the canons are infallible and eternal. It's just not

1579
01:53:46.199 --> 01:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>even a possible position. And that's different from the Creeds

1580
01:53:51.640 --> 01:53:55.119
<v Speaker 1>or the confessions or the dogmatic statements of an ecumenical council.

1581
01:53:57.319 --> 01:54:01.359
<v Speaker 1>And I would argue the anathemas are also. You can't

1582
01:54:01.399 --> 01:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>deny the anathemos like voice of reason. And these guys

1583
01:54:04.319 --> 01:54:09.560
<v Speaker 1>do to try to make Mystorius into something acceptable in

1584
01:54:09.560 --> 01:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Calolic Church, but they actually do, they actually

1585
01:54:11.520 --> 01:54:15.319
<v Speaker 1>accept Nestorius in the Romancolic Church. It's crazy. But again

1586
01:54:15.479 --> 01:54:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you notice that it's all premised on the idea that

1587
01:54:19.159 --> 01:54:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the system can evolve, and what we have today in

1588
01:54:23.079 --> 01:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the modern Roman system is somehow identical to the seed

1589
01:54:27.720 --> 01:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>forms of the Church in the first thousand years, when

1590
01:54:30.720 --> 01:54:41.800
<v Speaker 1>every ecumenical council has canons that refute the Vatican one mindset.

1591
01:54:42.680 --> 01:54:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Now wait a minute, Jay, I thought you said that

1592
01:54:45.880 --> 01:54:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the canons are flexible. That's correct. The argument is not

1593
01:54:49.479 --> 01:54:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that ecumenical canons are infallible and thus refute the premiacy

1594
01:54:54.880 --> 01:54:58.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Roman bishop. The point is that in every

1595
01:54:58.479 --> 01:55:03.039
<v Speaker 1>ecumenical council there are canons past that show that the

1596
01:55:03.079 --> 01:55:06.520
<v Speaker 1>council didn't have the mindset of Vatican one, because it

1597
01:55:06.600 --> 01:55:09.960
<v Speaker 1>contradicts the mindset of Vatican one in every acumenical council.

1598
01:55:10.199 --> 01:55:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But you notice the Roman Catholics have left out all

1599
01:55:12.560 --> 01:55:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of that evidence, and they've selectively chosen the things, and

1600
01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:19.479
<v Speaker 1>in this talk they haven't even done any that. They've

1601
01:55:19.520 --> 01:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>done little to no argumentation. They've cited three Bible verses

1602
01:55:23.800 --> 01:55:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and two councils and they haven't addressed any objections. And

1603
01:55:31.159 --> 01:55:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you right here this essay that I did

1604
01:55:35.920 --> 01:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>or excuse me that Seraphim, who's now a deacon. It

1605
01:55:38.720 --> 01:55:41.000
<v Speaker 1>might be a priest by now, but this was a

1606
01:55:41.039 --> 01:55:44.800
<v Speaker 1>buddy of ours from the discord, who is now a clergy.

1607
01:55:44.920 --> 01:55:48.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, from twenty eighteen. I think he wrote

1608
01:55:48.760 --> 01:55:55.239
<v Speaker 1>this in twenty eighteen. I posted in twenty twenty, So

1609
01:55:55.359 --> 01:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>my computers might be freezing here.

1610
01:56:04.960 --> 01:56:06.560
<v Speaker 6>It would be without a doubt.

1611
01:56:12.039 --> 01:56:18.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you and I see it too, also argue no

1612
01:56:18.119 --> 01:56:21.600
<v Speaker 4>doubt I would even know Vigilious and the way he

1613
01:56:21.720 --> 01:56:23.560
<v Speaker 4>views himself with the Fifth Council.

1614
01:56:24.520 --> 01:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>You just heard Ubi stomp Ibarra on Virgilia. So here's

1615
01:56:30.159 --> 01:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Loten appealing to Virgilius. And what did They're better? And

1616
01:56:38.039 --> 01:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Ibarra is way more advanced than either of these goofballs.

1617
01:56:40.640 --> 01:56:43.640
<v Speaker 1>What did he Borro say about Virgilius never departed from

1618
01:56:43.680 --> 01:56:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the traditions of the fathers and directed the Church of God?

1619
01:56:46.760 --> 01:56:51.199
<v Speaker 2>And do you think in the case of Saint Silverius,

1620
01:56:51.760 --> 01:56:54.840
<v Speaker 2>he was deposed by Bill Sorrius, he's sent to Justinian,

1621
01:56:54.880 --> 01:56:57.800
<v Speaker 2>finds out says you have to give the sky a trial.

1622
01:56:57.840 --> 01:56:58.560
<v Speaker 4>He's handed over.

1623
01:56:58.640 --> 01:57:04.279
<v Speaker 2>To Virgiliusius was a horrible person. I don't know from

1624
01:57:04.239 --> 01:57:06.319
<v Speaker 2>the sounds of it is horrible. I mean, how does

1625
01:57:06.359 --> 01:57:08.479
<v Speaker 2>that work out? If Virgilius is the pope, but he's

1626
01:57:08.560 --> 01:57:10.720
<v Speaker 2>judging a former pope. That means that the deposition of

1627
01:57:10.760 --> 01:57:13.399
<v Speaker 2>the former pope had to be valid if.

1628
01:57:13.279 --> 01:57:14.439
<v Speaker 4>Virgilius is a pope.

1629
01:57:14.439 --> 01:57:18.560
<v Speaker 2>If if the deposition is not invalid and Virgilius is

1630
01:57:18.640 --> 01:57:20.600
<v Speaker 2>judging him, then you still have the situation of a

1631
01:57:20.640 --> 01:57:22.119
<v Speaker 2>pope being judged by non pope.

1632
01:57:22.680 --> 01:57:23.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll be candid with you.

1633
01:57:23.920 --> 01:57:27.000
<v Speaker 12>This is something that I have not really had a

1634
01:57:27.079 --> 01:57:28.359
<v Speaker 12>satisfactory answer to.

1635
01:57:29.239 --> 01:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So the best top papacy apologist can't explain the very

1636
01:57:35.760 --> 01:57:39.399
<v Speaker 1>thing that Lofton just said is the best argument for

1637
01:57:39.439 --> 01:57:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the papacy? Are you serious or one of the best.

1638
01:57:43.039 --> 01:57:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Fourth council Leo? He most certainly thought his son was

1639
01:57:46.800 --> 01:57:50.079
<v Speaker 4>a definitive prior to an ecumenical council.

1640
01:57:50.359 --> 01:57:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody didn't, though, And the quote that we just saw

1641
01:57:54.920 --> 01:58:00.520
<v Speaker 1>from Richard Price refutes that. You see, And I wonder

1642
01:58:00.560 --> 01:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>if they still have the Price thing up. They might

1643
01:58:02.600 --> 01:58:05.079
<v Speaker 1>have taken it down just because it doesn't fit with

1644
01:58:06.159 --> 01:58:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Lofton's narrative. Right, So you hear you heard what Lofton said, Right?

1645
01:58:17.640 --> 01:58:24.239
<v Speaker 1>We know it's so obvious that Chalcedon Chalcedon thought Leo

1646
01:58:24.760 --> 01:58:30.159
<v Speaker 1>was authoritative and he had full temporal power and supremacy.

1647
01:58:30.199 --> 01:58:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear it once more.

1648
01:58:32.159 --> 01:58:35.199
<v Speaker 4>Why did the bishops in Chalcedon feel they needed to

1649
01:58:35.279 --> 01:58:39.279
<v Speaker 4>judge Theodora if Leo had already reinstated him.

1650
01:58:39.560 --> 01:58:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So why are the bishops of Chalcedon separately judging this

1651
01:58:43.880 --> 01:58:48.439
<v Speaker 1>individual called Theodora? It's over the Nestorian question, even though

1652
01:58:48.479 --> 01:58:55.039
<v Speaker 1>they knew that Leo had already pronounced a condemnation. If

1653
01:58:55.960 --> 01:59:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Leo had ex cathedra papal power and authority, they would

1654
01:59:00.399 --> 01:59:05.319
<v Speaker 1>not rejudge something that Rome has spoken cases closed, right,

1655
01:59:06.479 --> 01:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And what does their scholar that they're relying on here

1656
01:59:09.680 --> 01:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>with all of these translations of the council.

1657
01:59:11.560 --> 01:59:22.800
<v Speaker 13>Said, Well, they didn't they didn't recognize Roman jurisdiction in

1658
01:59:22.840 --> 01:59:23.880
<v Speaker 13>the Eastern Prophnce.

1659
01:59:24.000 --> 01:59:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh, oops, I guess it's not Vatican One at

1660
01:59:28.079 --> 01:59:29.039
<v Speaker 1>the time of Calcedon.

1661
01:59:29.159 --> 01:59:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Is it ruling on the matter? And what's even more interesting,

1662
01:59:33.720 --> 01:59:37.840
<v Speaker 4>he is he overturns a canon of the Council of Calcedon.

1663
01:59:39.079 --> 01:59:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Oops. Oops, it's not what he does.

1664
01:59:45.239 --> 01:59:49.760
<v Speaker 4>By the authority of Saint Peter a council.

1665
01:59:50.159 --> 01:59:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is the Roman Catholic revisionist story of what

1666
01:59:53.279 --> 01:59:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Canon twenty eight of Calceildon is about. When you actually

1667
01:59:56.600 --> 02:00:00.600
<v Speaker 1>look at what Leo says, Leo does not say, I

1668
02:00:00.680 --> 02:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>reject this because I'm the pope. I rejected because of Rome.

1669
02:00:04.600 --> 02:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Canon twenty eight of Calceldon that Constantinople one had already

1670
02:00:11.760 --> 02:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>enacted by the way out of Connunia with Rome made

1671
02:00:20.800 --> 02:00:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Constantinople second after Rome. So it placed new Rome second

1672
02:00:27.239 --> 02:00:36.359
<v Speaker 1>after old Rome. All right, so here it is, and

1673
02:00:37.119 --> 02:00:41.319
<v Speaker 1>why did Leo reject this? It had nothing to do

1674
02:00:41.720 --> 02:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>with Vatican one papal prerogatives. The real reason why, if

1675
02:00:46.760 --> 02:00:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you actually read into the subject matter, is that Leo believed,

1676
02:00:51.000 --> 02:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhat correctly, you could argue that Canon twenty eight of Calclodon,

1677
02:00:58.079 --> 02:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>which is actually a canon from Constantinople one, at this

1678
02:01:01.960 --> 02:01:05.279
<v Speaker 1>time Rome had not yet accepted Constantinople one. Keep that

1679
02:01:05.319 --> 02:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>in mind. Leo believed that it violated the rights and

1680
02:01:09.159 --> 02:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the privileges of Canon six of Nicia. So if you

1681
02:01:12.640 --> 02:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>go back to Nicia, Canon six says, let the ancient

1682
02:01:15.199 --> 02:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>customs in Egypt, Libya and Libya and Patapolis prevail. The

1683
02:01:18.920 --> 02:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Bishop Alexandria has jurisdiction in all these since his like

1684
02:01:22.840 --> 02:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is customary for the bishop of Rome and likewise Antioch.

1685
02:01:26.640 --> 02:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So notice the jurisdiction of Rome, Antioch, and Alexandria is

1686
02:01:31.000 --> 02:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>all likened to be similar. By the way, there's nothing

1687
02:01:34.079 --> 02:01:39.279
<v Speaker 1>about universal autocratic, unilateral jurisdiction here. And when you bring

1688
02:01:39.279 --> 02:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>it up to the Roman Catholics, well, it's an argument

1689
02:01:41.479 --> 02:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>from solnce because they just all knew it. It's not there,

1690
02:01:44.199 --> 02:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>but they knew it. So again they ignore the country

1691
02:01:47.000 --> 02:01:49.079
<v Speaker 1>evidence and just assume it and say that it's an

1692
02:01:49.119 --> 02:01:52.039
<v Speaker 1>argument from silence, which is what it borrow says. Now,

1693
02:01:53.199 --> 02:01:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Leo thought that to say that Constantinople now was the

1694
02:01:57.359 --> 02:02:02.359
<v Speaker 1>second to see after Rome in this listing of canonical

1695
02:02:02.399 --> 02:02:08.039
<v Speaker 1>privileges would be to violate Canon six of Nicea. So

1696
02:02:08.279 --> 02:02:11.399
<v Speaker 1>it had nothing to do with the authority of the

1697
02:02:11.479 --> 02:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Roman bishop. It's rather that this canon, that is Canon

1698
02:02:16.880 --> 02:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>twentia of Calcildon, was a restatement of a canon from

1699
02:02:24.439 --> 02:02:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Constantinople one. Constantinople one tried to make for the East.

1700
02:02:37.319 --> 02:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>In the East saw this as a ecumenical council. They

1701
02:02:58.800 --> 02:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>tried to make the UH the place of Constantinople second right.

1702
02:03:15.479 --> 02:03:29.399
<v Speaker 1>And if you go to UH Nicia. It's different in

1703
02:03:29.479 --> 02:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>terms of the canonical structure. Right, so it differs from

1704
02:03:32.199 --> 02:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Nicea in the canonical structure. So here you see, here's

1705
02:03:46.920 --> 02:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>here's Constantinople one. Right, here's Canon three. Because it is

1706
02:03:54.800 --> 02:03:59.399
<v Speaker 1>new Rome. Let the Bishop of Constantinople enjoy the privileges

1707
02:03:59.439 --> 02:04:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of honor after the Bishop of Rome. Does this say

1708
02:04:02.439 --> 02:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>anything about papal prerogatives unilateral jurisdiction. No? No, it says

1709
02:04:07.800 --> 02:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the privileges of honor right after the Bishop of Rome,

1710
02:04:13.680 --> 02:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and let the patriarchal Constantinople be number two. See so

1711
02:04:19.920 --> 02:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Leo says that's not fair to the canonical structure listed

1712
02:04:24.840 --> 02:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>at Chalcedon. That's why Leo rejects it. Right, has nothing

1713
02:04:30.319 --> 02:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to do with Vatican one papal powers. He just doesn't

1714
02:04:34.359 --> 02:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>accept it because the papacy did not accept Constantinople one

1715
02:04:39.600 --> 02:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at this time. Constant Noble one is the Trinity Council.

1716
02:04:44.199 --> 02:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the council that was held out of communion with Rome,

1717
02:04:48.880 --> 02:04:57.439
<v Speaker 1>which dogmatize the Cappadocian doctrine of the Trinity. The decree

1718
02:04:57.479 --> 02:05:00.239
<v Speaker 1>of that council says you must follow the two of

1719
02:05:00.279 --> 02:05:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Saint Gregory of Nissa to be orthodox in your trinitarian theology.

1720
02:05:05.520 --> 02:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the Roman Church does not follow that.

1721
02:05:08.359 --> 02:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>So constantinople One is not accepted as an ecumenical council

1722
02:05:15.479 --> 02:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>until centuries after Leo by the West. Do you hear me?

1723
02:05:19.960 --> 02:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>The papacy later accepts constantinople One even though it was

1724
02:05:25.840 --> 02:05:29.079
<v Speaker 1>called out of commune with Rome. It's presiding St. St.

1725
02:05:29.079 --> 02:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Meldio's died out of commune with Rome.

1726
02:05:31.640 --> 02:05:32.720
<v Speaker 6>Oh, it just.

1727
02:05:32.720 --> 02:05:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Happens to magically retroactively be an ecumenical council once Rome

1728
02:05:37.119 --> 02:05:41.439
<v Speaker 1>accepts it, and it dogmatizes the Trinity. So you understand

1729
02:05:41.479 --> 02:05:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that what they're talking about, they actually understood this. It

1730
02:05:44.479 --> 02:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>actually destroys the Vatican One via the Papacy because it's

1731
02:05:47.760 --> 02:05:53.199
<v Speaker 1>admitting that this original controversial canon comes from a council

1732
02:05:53.680 --> 02:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that defines and dogmatizes the Trinity outside of communion with Rome.

1733
02:06:01.680 --> 02:06:05.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no doubt, which, if you think about it, the

1734
02:06:05.520 --> 02:06:08.399
<v Speaker 6>proceeding has been set at the Council of Jerusalem in

1735
02:06:08.600 --> 02:06:13.000
<v Speaker 6>X chapter fifteen. Now, nobody's going to doubt or argue

1736
02:06:13.279 --> 02:06:15.359
<v Speaker 6>that the head of the church in Jerusalem.

1737
02:06:14.920 --> 02:06:18.119
<v Speaker 4>Was James Nobody, of course, But who is the one

1738
02:06:18.159 --> 02:06:18.680
<v Speaker 4>that makes the.

1739
02:06:18.640 --> 02:06:24.239
<v Speaker 6>Decision and James of course after James. Of course, James agrees,

1740
02:06:24.920 --> 02:06:27.319
<v Speaker 6>But it is Saint Peter who does it. And that's

1741
02:06:27.359 --> 02:06:31.479
<v Speaker 6>a big, big factor because you look at the commentary

1742
02:06:31.520 --> 02:06:34.840
<v Speaker 6>in X fifteen by Saint Jerome and he's noting the

1743
02:06:34.960 --> 02:06:38.319
<v Speaker 6>very same thing, calling Peter Saint Peter the prime mover

1744
02:06:38.720 --> 02:06:39.399
<v Speaker 6>of the Council.

1745
02:06:39.600 --> 02:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So well, first of all, the fact that Jerome says

1746
02:06:42.720 --> 02:06:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that that also doesn't translate into Vatican Ones claims and

1747
02:06:49.279 --> 02:06:55.439
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing in this that tells us that because so

1748
02:06:55.479 --> 02:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>hold on. So they're admitting that it's presided over by James.

1749
02:06:59.319 --> 02:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>But they're saying, but Peter makes all the decisions. What

1750
02:07:02.560 --> 02:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>does it actually say at the decree here it pleads

1751
02:07:07.800 --> 02:07:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the apostles and the elders with the whole church to

1752
02:07:13.319 --> 02:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>send this out. Does it say anything about papal decree?

1753
02:07:20.000 --> 02:07:23.279
<v Speaker 1>There is no papal decree model here. In fact, it's

1754
02:07:23.319 --> 02:07:26.359
<v Speaker 1>so bad for them they actually have to say that, well,

1755
02:07:26.399 --> 02:07:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Peter spoke at the beginning, and Jerome thinks that he

1756
02:07:31.279 --> 02:07:36.359
<v Speaker 1>was important at the council. But they just admitted that

1757
02:07:36.399 --> 02:07:44.079
<v Speaker 1>it was presided over right by James. Now let's see

1758
02:07:44.119 --> 02:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what their argument is. The apostles and the elders came

1759
02:07:46.960 --> 02:07:51.039
<v Speaker 1>together to consider this matter. There's a dispute. Peter spoke

1760
02:07:51.079 --> 02:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and said, men of God, you know that God chose

1761
02:07:55.000 --> 02:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>me to be the mouth of the gentiles. God knows

1762
02:07:58.920 --> 02:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the heart and acknowledge them by giving them the Holy Spirit.

1763
02:08:02.039 --> 02:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Just seated us, so we should receive them without much fuss.

1764
02:08:07.359 --> 02:08:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Then all the multitude kept silent, and Barnabas and Paul

1765
02:08:13.239 --> 02:08:20.239
<v Speaker 1>declared the wonders that they had done. So Peter speaks,

1766
02:08:20.760 --> 02:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Barnabas and Paul speak, Everyone's silent, and then after everyone

1767
02:08:25.680 --> 02:08:32.239
<v Speaker 1>was silent, James answers. So the focal point of this section,

1768
02:08:34.199 --> 02:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>just because Peter begins talking, that doesn't prove anything. How

1769
02:08:37.319 --> 02:08:42.239
<v Speaker 1>does that prove Vatican won? In fact, if I'm going

1770
02:08:42.319 --> 02:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to argue from the reverence, it's everyone becoming silent when

1771
02:08:48.439 --> 02:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>James speaks. James has the final say, not Peter. They didn't.

1772
02:08:55.920 --> 02:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>He just admit that James was presiding. Why would James

1773
02:08:59.199 --> 02:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>preside when Peter has the superiority. It should be Peter's presiding.

1774
02:09:06.680 --> 02:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So James has the final say so right here, and

1775
02:09:21.960 --> 02:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>then we get the Jerusalem Decree, where in the Jerusalem

1776
02:09:24.319 --> 02:09:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Decree do you see anything like the unilateral papal decrees

1777
02:09:30.760 --> 02:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that you see in the later eras of the church.

1778
02:09:43.960 --> 02:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't the letter just say Peter spoken cases closed?

1779
02:09:48.359 --> 02:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Remember they argue Peter has spoken through Leo Rome has

1780
02:09:52.359 --> 02:09:56.239
<v Speaker 1>spoken cases closed. Why didn't they just say Peter has

1781
02:09:56.279 --> 02:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>spoken cases closed? What's even the need for a synod? Anyway?

1782
02:10:04.760 --> 02:10:11.399
<v Speaker 6>We're not infected with Peterson when we begin to quote

1783
02:10:11.439 --> 02:10:15.319
<v Speaker 6>passages from the Bible and then quote commentary on the

1784
02:10:15.359 --> 02:10:16.920
<v Speaker 6>way the fathers viewed those passages.

1785
02:10:17.399 --> 02:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, but if you read Denny's book Papalism, he

1786
02:10:25.079 --> 02:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>has an entire chapter pointing out that the majority interpretation

1787
02:10:28.760 --> 02:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of Matthew sixteen is not that it's Peter. So once again,

1788
02:10:32.840 --> 02:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the majority, the consensus, which is largely I think there's

1789
02:10:39.119 --> 02:10:42.399
<v Speaker 1>like sixteen or so that think that it's Peter himself.

1790
02:10:42.880 --> 02:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>The majority is no, it's Peter's confession or it's something else, right,

1791
02:10:47.159 --> 02:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Peter's faith in that case, Well, we don't care about

1792
02:10:51.680 --> 02:10:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the majority. You see, so selectively quote mining again and

1793
02:10:56.520 --> 02:11:00.079
<v Speaker 1>ignoring the contrary or the majority is precisely what they do.

1794
02:11:00.479 --> 02:11:04.600
<v Speaker 6>It's important because we see a kernel of how that

1795
02:11:04.800 --> 02:11:05.880
<v Speaker 6>leadership was.

1796
02:11:06.800 --> 02:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh so you see it's not actually Vatican One, which

1797
02:11:10.600 --> 02:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be there from the outset, believed by all.

1798
02:11:13.279 --> 02:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>It's now the seeds and the kernels once again. So

1799
02:11:16.319 --> 02:11:19.479
<v Speaker 1>when there's not evidence, it's the seeds. But at the

1800
02:11:19.520 --> 02:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>same time they say it was always there. It was

1801
02:11:22.039 --> 02:11:30.279
<v Speaker 1>clear Henry twenty eight seventeen. Side note, new monastic lore dropped.

1802
02:11:30.279 --> 02:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that means. Harry Supponis went o.

1803
02:11:32.039 --> 02:11:35.359
<v Speaker 1>The philly Oquay downs downgrades the Holy Spirit, and it

1804
02:11:35.439 --> 02:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>encourages all these papal heresies. Yes, not an accident that

1805
02:11:38.159 --> 02:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>once the Phillioquay becomes more and more accepted in the West.

1806
02:11:42.800 --> 02:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the same thing with the rise of the papacy, right,

1807
02:11:46.680 --> 02:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the papacy coming to power is exactly when they begin

1808
02:11:51.720 --> 02:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>their rejection of the Father as the sole archae in

1809
02:11:55.600 --> 02:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the Godhead. Papal supremacy is a demonic usurping of the

1810
02:11:59.800 --> 02:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>world of spirit. Yeah, exactly, Charard's book on that. That's

1811
02:12:04.439 --> 02:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>really good church papacy schism. That's pretty much the whole

1812
02:12:07.239 --> 02:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>argument for the most part. Let's talk God, please search

1813
02:12:15.039 --> 02:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>up and I'm gonna I'm not gonna play those clips.

1814
02:12:17.199 --> 02:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Ward five dollars. William wants to debate the ingredients

1815
02:12:22.039 --> 02:12:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of your male enhancement pills. They say that you sell

1816
02:12:25.479 --> 02:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>fake pills. They're not male enhancement pills. They're pills that

1817
02:12:29.520 --> 02:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>relate to adaptogens and workouts, so it has nothing to

1818
02:12:32.840 --> 02:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>do with mail enhancement. They're not fake pills. You can

1819
02:12:39.239 --> 02:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>go get them and see for yourself. I mean, it's

1820
02:12:43.680 --> 02:12:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a multimillion dollar company. How would it be fake pills.

1821
02:12:46.439 --> 02:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>John Milner thirteen ninety nine, Canadian Christ is God Jordaan

1822
02:12:50.640 --> 02:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. Brother Sam said, God is my witness Jay.

1823
02:13:00.000 --> 02:13:03.039
<v Speaker 1>He is calling me a bald inward in my studio.

1824
02:13:03.239 --> 02:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The clips are all over Twitty's that's fake, man. I mean,

1825
02:13:06.680 --> 02:13:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting in here livestream with you. That's all fake.

1826
02:13:12.039 --> 02:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Sisiphost Canadian ten dollars. Set up a debate on a

1827
02:13:15.640 --> 02:13:17.399
<v Speaker 1>neutral platform. I'll try to get him to come to

1828
02:13:17.399 --> 02:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a neutral platform tonight. You're betting on all Brick not

1829
02:13:24.720 --> 02:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>being available. Yeah sure, yeah, I'm scared, even though I

1830
02:13:28.039 --> 02:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>showed you at the beginning of the stream five years

1831
02:13:30.960 --> 02:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>ago where I tried to set up debates with William

1832
02:13:32.800 --> 02:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Albreck and he would just postpone it for six months.

1833
02:13:34.880 --> 02:13:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Every time I do it, Cosmicgoulo five dollars. I realized

1834
02:13:40.039 --> 02:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that William was not very good when he did a

1835
02:13:41.840 --> 02:13:45.119
<v Speaker 1>video on Purgatory and Palomas and Descythius. He tried to

1836
02:13:45.119 --> 02:13:49.279
<v Speaker 1>say the Orthodox don't teach what Palamas says. Okay, whatever,

1837
02:13:50.199 --> 02:13:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy, glitchy two dollars. I just got here chat

1838
02:13:54.520 --> 02:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>yes or no. I don't know what that means. Common

1839
02:13:56.560 --> 02:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>sense ten dollars. Jane Ever said that we need to

1840
02:14:00.840 --> 02:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>debate right now. Yeah, it just says. I'll show you

1841
02:14:04.720 --> 02:14:17.479
<v Speaker 1>what it says. I sent him two different messages. I'll

1842
02:14:17.479 --> 02:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>show you what I sent him on here. So here's

1843
02:14:32.039 --> 02:14:40.399
<v Speaker 1>this meltdown material here, what's this? This is two different

1844
02:14:40.439 --> 02:14:44.119
<v Speaker 1>messages here. One says, how are Protestants going to be

1845
02:14:44.119 --> 02:14:46.479
<v Speaker 1>better off defenders of the Trinity than the Orthodox? So

1846
02:14:46.520 --> 02:14:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the initial thing that I took issue with. Then

1847
02:14:49.359 --> 02:14:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I said, how about you and Albert come debate me

1848
02:14:51.319 --> 02:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on the energies and the triad okay? And then I

1849
02:14:54.760 --> 02:14:58.079
<v Speaker 1>sent him a letter to thirty four Basil and then

1850
02:14:58.119 --> 02:15:01.079
<v Speaker 1>I said we can have a friendly exchange. Whoa, Oh

1851
02:15:01.119 --> 02:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, I'm unreal. And I sent the exact same

1852
02:15:04.720 --> 02:15:08.159
<v Speaker 1>thing on Twitter, except for maybe a couple words different.

1853
02:15:09.800 --> 02:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's what called That's what caused today's flip up.

1854
02:15:20.840 --> 02:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>When he called in, they played dumb William ran and

1855
02:15:24.960 --> 02:15:29.079
<v Speaker 1>accused Jay of calling only because he left. Try to

1856
02:15:29.159 --> 02:15:34.279
<v Speaker 1>keep up. I holify, I heal a five five dollars,

1857
02:15:34.439 --> 02:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Eric five dollars. This is what happens when Sham Chamun

1858
02:15:37.840 --> 02:15:44.159
<v Speaker 1>lets the hul comania run wild himself. Brother mL hated

1859
02:15:44.199 --> 02:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Kummunism three dollars. At forty nine minutes of his stream,

1860
02:15:51.000 --> 02:15:53.119
<v Speaker 1>you can see the real reason why he's mad. Go

1861
02:15:53.199 --> 02:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>watch it before he deletes it. I don't know. I'm

1862
02:15:57.640 --> 02:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna I don't I don't even follow or keep

1863
02:15:59.880 --> 02:16:02.399
<v Speaker 1>up with this stuff like these people are they think

1864
02:16:02.439 --> 02:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm like following and watching all their stuff, Like

1865
02:16:05.760 --> 02:16:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I watched Sam Schmun here and there, mainly clips. I

1866
02:16:08.479 --> 02:16:11.479
<v Speaker 1>don't follow his live streams. I was interested in today's

1867
02:16:11.520 --> 02:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>live stream because he was talking about Protestant and Catholic

1868
02:16:14.760 --> 02:16:19.399
<v Speaker 1>doctrine views of the Trinity. Models of the Trinity. Roland

1869
02:16:19.800 --> 02:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>William is ready to debate. Are you ready? I mean

1870
02:16:22.039 --> 02:16:25.079
<v Speaker 1>I thought we're gonna do it tonight. Forty two attack

1871
02:16:25.119 --> 02:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>three dollars. Favorite part of tonight. All of us Catholics

1872
02:16:27.479 --> 02:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in the chrispal chat want Andrew to moderate. I thought

1873
02:16:30.920 --> 02:16:35.559
<v Speaker 1>we were going to do it. Beny Canadian two dollars

1874
02:16:35.840 --> 02:16:39.399
<v Speaker 1>time stamp. He is live. This must be old. Look

1875
02:16:39.399 --> 02:16:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you miond go love your cell p oh dollars? Am

1876
02:16:41.799 --> 02:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I am? I own opinion. The only thing that the

1877
02:16:46.360 --> 02:16:50.719
<v Speaker 1>ORB could be is an uncreated energy. It's from God. Yeah,

1878
02:16:50.760 --> 02:16:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that's what it is. If at Jay versus

1879
02:16:54.559 --> 02:16:57.319
<v Speaker 1>All Break debate happens, it must be blood sports. Well

1880
02:16:58.520 --> 02:17:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't. That guy is the worst. And I say

1881
02:17:01.799 --> 02:17:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the reason I say is the worst first of all

1882
02:17:03.360 --> 02:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is that you see the tear of the apologetics we

1883
02:17:05.159 --> 02:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>get here right. It's just literal, low tier quote minding.

1884
02:17:10.440 --> 02:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>That's about all it is. And the reason he's such

1885
02:17:17.799 --> 02:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a nasty individual is that years ago on a live stream,

1886
02:17:24.520 --> 02:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>he started saying this stuff like he was going to

1887
02:17:26.319 --> 02:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>fight me in real life, and I clipped it. I

1888
02:17:28.799 --> 02:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>have the screenshots. And then he says, I never said that.

1889
02:17:31.719 --> 02:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I never said that. I mean he was saying it

1890
02:17:33.200 --> 02:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in the chat. He's like he wants to fight in

1891
02:17:34.639 --> 02:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>real life, which is so ridiculous because we were talking

1892
02:17:37.600 --> 02:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>about doing a debate, because again in twenty nineteen and

1893
02:17:42.120 --> 02:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, I tried to schedule debates with him and

1894
02:17:45.000 --> 02:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>he would just postpone it for six months every time.

1895
02:17:47.920 --> 02:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>So here we are five years later, six years later,

1896
02:17:52.079 --> 02:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's claiming that I'm scared to debate him. It's

1897
02:17:55.120 --> 02:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the same point that UBI made, is that UBI also

1898
02:17:58.520 --> 02:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to work out with All Bricked, and you just

1899
02:18:02.360 --> 02:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>get this, you know, tap dancing play that like it's

1900
02:18:06.680 --> 02:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>like I don't have time to run through this game

1901
02:18:10.200 --> 02:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with you, like we've already tried to do this. If

1902
02:18:13.639 --> 02:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the beginning of the stream, the

1903
02:18:14.840 --> 02:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>first thing I talked about, I showed you his old

1904
02:18:16.719 --> 02:18:18.959
<v Speaker 1>messages where he would say, oh, I need six months,

1905
02:18:19.000 --> 02:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so give me another six months, give me another six months,

1906
02:18:21.680 --> 02:18:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and it just got old. I just finally moved on.

1907
02:18:27.040 --> 02:18:30.079
<v Speaker 1>And then I called Albert one day because I had

1908
02:18:30.159 --> 02:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I used to have his phone number, and he went

1909
02:18:33.520 --> 02:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>melted down at all. He lost it on me and

1910
02:18:35.719 --> 02:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>said that there is no discord. This is like twenty

1911
02:18:39.479 --> 02:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty somewhere in there in twenty twenty one, so that

1912
02:18:43.079 --> 02:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a discord. It's all made up I

1913
02:18:45.079 --> 02:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>paid bots to go in there. There is no no

1914
02:18:48.040 --> 02:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>one is converting to Orthodoxy. This literally, this is what

1915
02:18:50.719 --> 02:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>he said. And then he gave my phone number to Lofton,

1916
02:18:54.719 --> 02:18:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and then Lofton sent me a fake lawsuit threat. So

1917
02:18:57.799 --> 02:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're dealing with. This is the people

1918
02:18:59.760 --> 02:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that were talking about here. Juliana Talant five dollars, sir,

1919
02:19:04.239 --> 02:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>thank you for all that you've done with your lectures,

1920
02:19:06.879 --> 02:19:09.719
<v Speaker 1>presentations and debates. When I ask you some questions about

1921
02:19:10.280 --> 02:19:14.239
<v Speaker 1>they're troubling me. PS. Great victory for the devil for

1922
02:19:14.319 --> 02:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the trash of Sam Shamun. It's so sad. Common sense

1923
02:19:18.040 --> 02:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dollars. You handled this very well. You're often

1924
02:19:21.200 --> 02:19:23.799
<v Speaker 1>accused of being mean, but I've lost respect for Shamun.

1925
02:19:24.079 --> 02:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>These are all bogus accusations. Fwintes admits that his debate

1926
02:19:30.639 --> 02:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>with you is the worst, but seeing this, he did

1927
02:19:34.639 --> 02:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the most with what he had. Stay strong, be humble,

1928
02:19:38.040 --> 02:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>God bless you and your family. Well, thank you for

1929
02:19:39.719 --> 02:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that generous super chat. I appreciate that. SS twenty one

1930
02:19:42.879 --> 02:19:47.079
<v Speaker 1>five dollars. See what John Christism says about Acts fifteen.

1931
02:19:47.440 --> 02:19:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Ibarra has a paper on it that basically refutes himself.

1932
02:19:52.120 --> 02:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. Everybody should look up chrystalstom on Acts fifteen.

1933
02:19:55.639 --> 02:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have my church father's set here at this house,

1934
02:19:58.680 --> 02:20:02.319
<v Speaker 1>so I can't look it up. But if you if

1935
02:20:02.319 --> 02:20:04.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a link on new admit you guys can send

1936
02:20:04.079 --> 02:20:08.559
<v Speaker 1>it to me. Store ninety six five dollars. Shout out

1937
02:20:08.559 --> 02:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to my dog block Party Vintage who is now forts

1938
02:20:11.920 --> 02:20:17.079
<v Speaker 1>certified Carrie s MW nine three dollars if possible, not

1939
02:20:17.120 --> 02:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>too much. Could you summarize your position on what we're

1940
02:20:21.360 --> 02:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we're critiquing the papers position all night tonight v N

1941
02:20:24.799 --> 02:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>two dollars. You are a genius, big fan. Keep it up,

1942
02:20:27.920 --> 02:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks man, I appreciate that.

1943
02:20:29.360 --> 02:20:32.200
<v Speaker 6>And of course it becomes much more fleshed out through

1944
02:20:32.239 --> 02:20:35.040
<v Speaker 6>church history. And you bring up a great example there

1945
02:20:35.079 --> 02:20:38.120
<v Speaker 6>with the striking down of the canon. Yeah, that is

1946
02:20:38.200 --> 02:20:42.799
<v Speaker 6>a tough one to overcome there, because somebody that did

1947
02:20:42.840 --> 02:20:46.639
<v Speaker 6>not believe they had that authority vested in them from

1948
02:20:46.799 --> 02:20:50.840
<v Speaker 6>Christ would not have even had the audacity.

1949
02:20:51.440 --> 02:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It was such a thing. But the do it, well,

1950
02:20:54.920 --> 02:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a false equivalence because that's asking me a non sequitor.

1951
02:20:59.280 --> 02:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Because you just heard Richard Price say that the Eastern

1952
02:21:04.920 --> 02:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Bishops didn't accept everything that the Roman bishops did because

1953
02:21:09.200 --> 02:21:12.559
<v Speaker 1>they didn't recognize Roman jurisdiction in the East. So the

1954
02:21:12.639 --> 02:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>fact that someone doesn't accept something that doesn't prove that

1955
02:21:15.520 --> 02:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>they have papal supremacy. I mean, if the Eastern bishops

1956
02:21:19.159 --> 02:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are rejecting something that the West is doing, does that

1957
02:21:21.559 --> 02:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>mean the Eastern bishops have papal supremacy? Does rejecting something

1958
02:21:25.520 --> 02:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>prove papal supremacy? It just means that Calcidon that Leo

1959
02:21:29.559 --> 02:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't accept Constantinople one. But guess what the East did.

1960
02:21:34.120 --> 02:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So at the time of Leo, you have differing numbers

1961
02:21:38.239 --> 02:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and views of what the councils have been. Right. If

1962
02:21:41.719 --> 02:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you're in the East, you believe that there's nicea constantinople

1963
02:21:46.159 --> 02:21:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I ephesis and now Chalcedon. If you're Leo, you believe

1964
02:21:51.360 --> 02:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>in Nicea ephesis Calcedon. So they don't even accept the

1965
02:21:57.440 --> 02:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>same councils. Now, guess what who in up being right

1966
02:22:00.719 --> 02:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in this situation. Rome a few centuries after Leo accepts

1967
02:22:06.799 --> 02:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>constant the number one, So the East was right the

1968
02:22:08.920 --> 02:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>entire time. This all refuses what they're saying. Let's move

1969
02:22:13.760 --> 02:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>on to their coverage of Francis. Let's see what they

1970
02:22:16.680 --> 02:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>say about frank.

1971
02:22:19.440 --> 02:22:22.120
<v Speaker 4>It just seems like that there, you know, there's a

1972
02:22:22.159 --> 02:22:25.040
<v Speaker 4>point of disconnect there now. So in other words, they're

1973
02:22:25.040 --> 02:22:27.959
<v Speaker 4>their hang up is that? Okay? I can see this historically,

1974
02:22:28.040 --> 02:22:29.959
<v Speaker 4>but I just don't know about Paul Francis.

1975
02:22:31.120 --> 02:22:33.079
<v Speaker 6>The number one thing I would say is I have

1976
02:22:33.200 --> 02:22:36.200
<v Speaker 6>never been the biggest fan of Pulp Francis ever, But

1977
02:22:36.280 --> 02:22:39.680
<v Speaker 6>he is the Vicar of Christ. Sure, here's a valid pope.

1978
02:22:40.040 --> 02:22:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Here's the pope. And in his defense, Michael, I think

1979
02:22:44.200 --> 02:22:47.319
<v Speaker 6>he gets ripped out of context so much. I really

1980
02:22:47.399 --> 02:22:47.760
<v Speaker 6>really do.

1981
02:23:28.399 --> 02:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen sixty eight gay priests are punished with death in

1982
02:23:34.200 --> 02:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>this document. Now you can bless couples of the same

1983
02:23:42.000 --> 02:23:45.479
<v Speaker 1>sex in the Roman Catholic Church. This is the Vatican,

1984
02:23:46.239 --> 02:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Francis's fiducia. Supplicans and the Romancalolics say, well,

1985
02:23:53.360 --> 02:23:55.559
<v Speaker 1>but up at the top it says that you can't

1986
02:23:55.600 --> 02:23:58.319
<v Speaker 1>bless the gay marriage and the bubble. It doesn't matter

1987
02:23:58.360 --> 02:24:00.799
<v Speaker 1>what it says up at the top. All that means

1988
02:24:00.840 --> 02:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is that the document contradicts. There you go, So what

1989
02:24:07.719 --> 02:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>was the point. I'm starting to get tired because it's

1990
02:24:09.360 --> 02:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>late at night, right, So what was the point of this, Francis,

1991
02:24:14.239 --> 02:24:16.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm showing you another contradiction that disproves them.

1992
02:24:16.559 --> 02:24:16.680
<v Speaker 6>Right.

1993
02:24:16.799 --> 02:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Francis says, the Gospel is contrary to death penalty. Right,

1994
02:24:27.840 --> 02:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm showing you how crazy and contradictor of the Roman

1995
02:24:30.799 --> 02:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Catholic system is. Pope Francis Vatican News. The death penalty

1996
02:24:37.159 --> 02:24:41.319
<v Speaker 1>is inadmissible. It is contrary to the Gospel. Here he says,

1997
02:24:41.360 --> 02:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's contrary to nature. Right. The CDC Congregation of the

1998
02:24:48.879 --> 02:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Douction fe has made changes to the death penalty. It

1999
02:24:52.360 --> 02:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is no longer admissible. But wait a minute. In fifteen

2000
02:24:56.920 --> 02:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight under Paya, that's the fifth you were punished

2001
02:25:05.319 --> 02:25:08.799
<v Speaker 1>with death if you were a Skittles priest. Do you

2002
02:25:08.840 --> 02:25:17.079
<v Speaker 1>see that punishable by death in fifteen sixty eight. Now

2003
02:25:17.239 --> 02:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fast forward to Fiducia supplicons of Francis two years ago.

2004
02:25:21.680 --> 02:25:25.239
<v Speaker 1>The blessings of the same sex couples is now within

2005
02:25:25.280 --> 02:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the horizon of the Roman Catholic Church. I'm not talking

2006
02:25:29.200 --> 02:25:34.239
<v Speaker 1>about marriage, but you know what it says here as couples,

2007
02:25:34.280 --> 02:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they can be blessed. It's just not marriage. Skittle's priest

2008
02:25:41.760 --> 02:25:47.079
<v Speaker 1>put the death fifteen sixty eight. Now the death monality

2009
02:25:47.120 --> 02:25:49.959
<v Speaker 1>is the country of the Gospel and skittles. Couples can

2010
02:25:49.959 --> 02:25:53.239
<v Speaker 1>be blessed. So here's what Sam Chamoun and William Albreck

2011
02:25:53.360 --> 02:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>want to convert you to. There you go, I'm mute, dude,

2012
02:26:01.879 --> 02:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Jay, You're muted, Eric Vigilant Data Loss and

2013
02:26:04.200 --> 02:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Johnson it's because I'm getting tired, so I'm getting

2014
02:26:08.159 --> 02:26:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a little sleepy here, Noel, I'm Mirandez two dollars. God

2015
02:26:13.719 --> 02:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>wants I'm muted, Logos Logic three dollars. Is this your

2016
02:26:17.479 --> 02:26:20.239
<v Speaker 1>first time on the internet? Si two dollars. I'm mute.

2017
02:26:20.280 --> 02:26:22.079
<v Speaker 1>See maybe I should just unmute because you guys send

2018
02:26:22.120 --> 02:26:30.479
<v Speaker 1>super chats when I'm muted. Ultra violence two dollars. I

2019
02:26:30.479 --> 02:26:33.479
<v Speaker 1>always thought Shimun had a weird, unwarranted level of confidence,

2020
02:26:33.520 --> 02:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but I couldn't put my finger on it. Clearly has issues.

2021
02:26:36.040 --> 02:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>He can meet you like some Dawa Nube bizarre behavior,

2022
02:26:39.559 --> 02:26:46.079
<v Speaker 1>Windy Torrents, I'm mute. Jordan Johnson five dollars. I will

2023
02:26:46.079 --> 02:26:48.479
<v Speaker 1>fight Albrick. He reminds me of a father in law.

2024
02:26:48.559 --> 02:26:56.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm six four, two forty. There's no need to fight

2025
02:26:56.079 --> 02:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody who just had to refute these stupid positions.

2026
02:26:58.040 --> 02:27:01.760
<v Speaker 10>Now on the other side to be gives.

2027
02:27:01.840 --> 02:27:03.319
<v Speaker 1>So I want to keep I want to remind you guys,

2028
02:27:04.120 --> 02:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>who's the person who asked to debate the theological subject matter?

2029
02:27:08.719 --> 02:27:08.799
<v Speaker 5>Me?

2030
02:27:09.360 --> 02:27:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Who's the person that did a stream about the theological

2031
02:27:12.520 --> 02:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>subject matter?

2032
02:27:13.280 --> 02:27:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Me?

2033
02:27:14.000 --> 02:27:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Did anyone else do that? Or did they just lose

2034
02:27:17.120 --> 02:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>their minds and melt down?

2035
02:27:20.920 --> 02:27:23.079
<v Speaker 6>Do I think he can be more precise? Sometimes I do,

2036
02:27:23.440 --> 02:27:26.120
<v Speaker 6>I truly do. But I don't think Pope France this

2037
02:27:26.159 --> 02:27:28.840
<v Speaker 6>is heretical. I think I know he's the pulp. He's

2038
02:27:28.840 --> 02:27:32.760
<v Speaker 6>about successor Saint Peter uh, and I think that there's

2039
02:27:32.799 --> 02:27:33.760
<v Speaker 6>a lot of good he does.

2040
02:27:34.079 --> 02:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so a lot of platitudes. Where was any actual

2041
02:27:38.000 --> 02:27:45.559
<v Speaker 1>defense of any controversial statements or explanations? So he this

2042
02:27:45.639 --> 02:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is presuming questions for Catholics. Right, So every one of

2043
02:27:49.239 --> 02:27:53.319
<v Speaker 1>these little sections is what about that? I can one?

2044
02:27:53.760 --> 02:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>What about the head of the church? Right, it's all

2045
02:27:55.559 --> 02:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of questions. What about Pope Francis? Does he have

2046
02:27:59.680 --> 02:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>an a? He just states his own psychological belief, his

2047
02:28:03.959 --> 02:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>own self reporting that he believes Francis is the pope. Okay,

2048
02:28:09.520 --> 02:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>well that's great, but how is that an argument?

2049
02:28:12.639 --> 02:28:16.159
<v Speaker 6>See? I truly do. I really do think first off,

2050
02:28:16.879 --> 02:28:17.920
<v Speaker 6>we villainize him
