WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Clarity vote.

2
00:00:00.760 --> 00:00:03.839
<v Speaker 2>Chaos is now underway as we near the last few

3
00:00:03.879 --> 00:00:07.080
<v Speaker 2>hours of where anything can happen. So today is going

4
00:00:07.120 --> 00:00:09.160
<v Speaker 2>to be a good one. We'll get right into it.

5
00:00:09.519 --> 00:00:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to showcase right here as we are one

6
00:00:11.640 --> 00:00:14.240
<v Speaker 2>day away, guys, three hours and probably those last three

7
00:00:14.279 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 2>hours are not going to matter because most everybody, if

8
00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:19.760
<v Speaker 2>they're not leaving DC and they are staying over, then

9
00:00:19.879 --> 00:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>we might build a new counterclock. But right now, as

10
00:00:23.199 --> 00:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>of tomorrow, the Senate recess will be in play and

11
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:30.199
<v Speaker 2>Clarity may not be on the table. That of course,

12
00:00:30.199 --> 00:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the polymarket, it does showcase this.

13
00:00:33.479 --> 00:00:34.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the weekly.

14
00:00:34.479 --> 00:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Right now on where Clarity odds are dropping to their

15
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>lowest point in quite some time. And we're going to

16
00:00:41.079 --> 00:00:44.439
<v Speaker 2>have a special guest on today. We'll break into this,

17
00:00:44.520 --> 00:00:47.359
<v Speaker 2>but before we bring her on, I want to go

18
00:00:47.479 --> 00:00:49.880
<v Speaker 2>over to a clip here, and this is of course,

19
00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:52.600
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in Russia around regulation.

20
00:00:52.719 --> 00:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Take a look.

21
00:00:53.960 --> 00:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Russia passes the first comprehensive crypto law.

22
00:00:57.200 --> 00:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Russia's new framework.

23
00:00:58.359 --> 00:01:01.679
<v Speaker 4>Which is effective from first Septeman this year, has created

24
00:01:01.759 --> 00:01:04.280
<v Speaker 4>the country's first full legal regime.

25
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:07.359
<v Speaker 5>Wat Guru picked this up fast over four hundred and

26
00:01:07.400 --> 00:01:10.239
<v Speaker 5>thirty seven thousand views within hours.

27
00:01:10.359 --> 00:01:13.840
<v Speaker 6>Russia has finally gone all in on crypto.

28
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I begin love this.

29
00:01:16.560 --> 00:01:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Come on Russia.

30
00:01:18.480 --> 00:01:21.920
<v Speaker 5>It landed on the same Tuesday as the clarity delay.

31
00:01:22.120 --> 00:01:26.079
<v Speaker 1>We are falling behind everybody. So the US just lost

32
00:01:26.120 --> 00:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to Russia in crypto.

33
00:01:27.959 --> 00:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Don't mistake this for a full embrace of crypto.

34
00:01:30.959 --> 00:01:35.120
<v Speaker 5>It's the opposite. This is regulation as control, not regulation

35
00:01:35.239 --> 00:01:35.879
<v Speaker 5>as liberation.

36
00:01:36.239 --> 00:01:38.159
<v Speaker 1>And get this, it's back by State Oho Bank.

37
00:01:38.200 --> 00:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>This serves Russian defense contractors and built by fugitive Oligar.

38
00:01:41.599 --> 00:01:46.680
<v Speaker 5>And these depositories will need minimum equity somewhere between fifty

39
00:01:46.760 --> 00:01:50.120
<v Speaker 5>million and two hundred million rubles just to operate.

40
00:01:50.359 --> 00:01:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Russia still don't want people using crypto to buy everyday

41
00:01:54.760 --> 00:01:57.560
<v Speaker 3>goods and services inside the country.

42
00:01:57.760 --> 00:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Retail Russians are captured just thirty eight hundred dollars a year.

43
00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>That is absolutely tiny. And this was never about giving

44
00:02:03.760 --> 00:02:04.719
<v Speaker 1>their citizens freedom.

45
00:02:04.879 --> 00:02:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Large transfers to foreign accounts now require a mandatory forty

46
00:02:08.240 --> 00:02:09.080
<v Speaker 2>eight hour hold.

47
00:02:09.159 --> 00:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound like a super protection to me, all right.

48
00:02:23.039 --> 00:02:25.479
<v Speaker 2>So the point being is that this was all I

49
00:02:25.520 --> 00:02:29.159
<v Speaker 2>think theater, and we kind of expected this coming out

50
00:02:29.159 --> 00:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of some other countries, and that of course kind of

51
00:02:32.159 --> 00:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>puts it into the front of what's happening here in

52
00:02:34.280 --> 00:02:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the US. So I wanted to bring on Kret Calvert,

53
00:02:36.280 --> 00:02:38.840
<v Speaker 2>who is the vice president for US policy at Coinbase.

54
00:02:38.879 --> 00:02:41.520
<v Speaker 6>How are you, Kara, great, Thanks so much for having me.

55
00:02:41.879 --> 00:02:44.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So a lot happening right now. We played a

56
00:02:44.639 --> 00:02:47.039
<v Speaker 2>clip there, of course, of Russia, where really it's more

57
00:02:47.080 --> 00:02:49.199
<v Speaker 2>of an oligarch set up over there, so it's not

58
00:02:49.319 --> 00:02:50.159
<v Speaker 2>really regulation.

59
00:02:50.879 --> 00:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We have seen good.

60
00:02:51.879 --> 00:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Regulation though in places like Japan, which has been very

61
00:02:55.599 --> 00:02:58.159
<v Speaker 2>pro and then of course you look at what's happening

62
00:02:58.199 --> 00:03:02.360
<v Speaker 2>in Europe with Mika, and even to that extent, they've

63
00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:04.800
<v Speaker 2>been somewhat regulatory, but at least they have a consumer

64
00:03:05.039 --> 00:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>element in it that is designed for obviously for users

65
00:03:09.039 --> 00:03:11.759
<v Speaker 2>within crypto in general. But when you look at what's

66
00:03:11.759 --> 00:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>happening right now in DC, who would you say is

67
00:03:14.560 --> 00:03:17.319
<v Speaker 2>standing in the way here on this last day before

68
00:03:17.840 --> 00:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>a recess.

69
00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:21.919
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's been a long slog. I'd say that there

70
00:03:21.960 --> 00:03:24.919
<v Speaker 7>are a few issues that are left. Ultimately, though, we

71
00:03:24.960 --> 00:03:26.840
<v Speaker 7>need to get to sixty votes, so a very few

72
00:03:26.919 --> 00:03:29.039
<v Speaker 7>number of people can hold out a lot of power,

73
00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and there are a few issues that Democrats have identified

74
00:03:33.159 --> 00:03:34.680
<v Speaker 7>as key to getting their votes.

75
00:03:34.759 --> 00:03:37.240
<v Speaker 6>I think each one of those has been ticked off.

76
00:03:37.560 --> 00:03:40.960
<v Speaker 7>Whether it comes from law enforcement, there's an entirely new

77
00:03:41.080 --> 00:03:43.919
<v Speaker 7>law enforcement title combating a list at Finance. There's a

78
00:03:43.919 --> 00:03:45.319
<v Speaker 7>new title on a list at Finance.

79
00:03:45.639 --> 00:03:47.199
<v Speaker 6>There are new.

80
00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:51.560
<v Speaker 7>Restrictions and consumer protections around intermediaries in the agriculture title.

81
00:03:51.840 --> 00:03:54.080
<v Speaker 7>So there are a lot of provisions. And I think

82
00:03:54.199 --> 00:03:56.120
<v Speaker 7>we've got a day left. As you noted, I love

83
00:03:56.199 --> 00:03:59.280
<v Speaker 7>the clock. Everybody needs a good clock to get action.

84
00:03:59.599 --> 00:04:02.240
<v Speaker 7>And I think that, you know, hopefully we have a vote,

85
00:04:02.280 --> 00:04:05.039
<v Speaker 7>Hopefully we see a motion to proceed filed today, and

86
00:04:05.120 --> 00:04:07.240
<v Speaker 7>ultimately I think the question is going to have to

87
00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:08.639
<v Speaker 7>be called to see where people stand.

88
00:04:09.280 --> 00:04:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

89
00:04:09.919 --> 00:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the point is is that I think

90
00:04:12.639 --> 00:04:16.040
<v Speaker 2>this would be a failure, especially for Republicans, if they

91
00:04:16.040 --> 00:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>don't even get it to the floor for a vote.

92
00:04:18.199 --> 00:04:20.959
<v Speaker 2>So I think Thune, of course, is under the gun.

93
00:04:21.040 --> 00:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Right now.

94
00:04:21.759 --> 00:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>What about the issue right now? Why hasn't Thune made

95
00:04:24.920 --> 00:04:27.199
<v Speaker 2>a public statement on clarity? You think here we are

96
00:04:27.240 --> 00:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>a day before.

97
00:04:29.439 --> 00:04:31.639
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, he said multiple times, and he wants to

98
00:04:31.680 --> 00:04:33.600
<v Speaker 7>vote before they leave. I think the big question is

99
00:04:33.639 --> 00:04:36.120
<v Speaker 7>when are they leaving? Are they leaving tomorrow? Are they

100
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:38.920
<v Speaker 7>leaving on Saturday. It's a bit like tetris when you're

101
00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:40.879
<v Speaker 7>in the leadership's office trying to figure out how to

102
00:04:40.879 --> 00:04:43.600
<v Speaker 7>get all these things to fit together with the time requirements,

103
00:04:43.920 --> 00:04:48.759
<v Speaker 7>with the necessary you know, whether it's time agreements or amendments,

104
00:04:48.800 --> 00:04:50.439
<v Speaker 7>you have to figure out how it all fits together.

105
00:04:50.519 --> 00:04:52.279
<v Speaker 7>So I think that's the big question is when are

106
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:55.079
<v Speaker 7>they leaving and then if this can fit into that

107
00:04:55.120 --> 00:04:56.680
<v Speaker 7>time that time allotment.

108
00:04:57.079 --> 00:05:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, so you're mentioning that a weekend. Do

109
00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you feel like a weekend vote could actually happen here?

110
00:05:05.959 --> 00:05:06.600
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely?

111
00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:08.519
<v Speaker 7>I think that there is absolutely still time to get

112
00:05:08.519 --> 00:05:10.680
<v Speaker 7>this across the finish line. I think the big question

113
00:05:10.759 --> 00:05:13.759
<v Speaker 7>is whether or not it hangs out into September. When

114
00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:16.800
<v Speaker 7>they come back on September fourteenth, I think the conventional

115
00:05:16.839 --> 00:05:18.800
<v Speaker 7>wisdom is right now, they'll have a vote.

116
00:05:18.839 --> 00:05:21.199
<v Speaker 6>It'll be a big moment. It'll be a moment.

117
00:05:20.920 --> 00:05:23.240
<v Speaker 7>That the industry that certainly I've been waiting for for

118
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:25.720
<v Speaker 7>a decade. I started working in crypto in twenty sixteen,

119
00:05:26.160 --> 00:05:28.399
<v Speaker 7>so this has not been an overnight process. It has

120
00:05:28.439 --> 00:05:31.000
<v Speaker 7>been something that we had worked on for years, and

121
00:05:31.040 --> 00:05:32.879
<v Speaker 7>I think the time has finally come where they're going.

122
00:05:32.800 --> 00:05:35.319
<v Speaker 2>To call the vote all right, so you feel it

123
00:05:35.360 --> 00:05:37.439
<v Speaker 2>still is a possibility of being in play. We may

124
00:05:37.439 --> 00:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>have to extend our countdown into the weekend. You had

125
00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:43.519
<v Speaker 2>Senator Tillis though, also brought out something that let me

126
00:05:43.600 --> 00:05:45.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of zoom in on that says that the White

127
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:49.639
<v Speaker 2>House is now engaging on a Bipartisan Clarity Act ethics text.

128
00:05:50.279 --> 00:05:54.040
<v Speaker 2>This is almost unprecedented. We have not seen an administration

129
00:05:54.519 --> 00:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>go this far, especially this late in the game. And again,

130
00:05:59.319 --> 00:06:02.879
<v Speaker 2>this looks at a possibility here of where this may

131
00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:06.160
<v Speaker 2>eliminate all the issues that the Democrats were kind of

132
00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>pointing to. Do you feel that this is kind of

133
00:06:09.560 --> 00:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>the last thing or is this still a situation of

134
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:14.079
<v Speaker 2>protecting the banks and so on?

135
00:06:15.480 --> 00:06:18.240
<v Speaker 7>This is absolutely one of the key gating factors, and

136
00:06:18.680 --> 00:06:21.680
<v Speaker 7>it is unprecedented. Never before have we seen an ethics

137
00:06:21.759 --> 00:06:25.439
<v Speaker 7>provision that has voluntarily been agreed to by a sitting

138
00:06:25.480 --> 00:06:27.920
<v Speaker 7>president to put in place something that's never been done

139
00:06:27.920 --> 00:06:29.720
<v Speaker 7>in the history of the United States. You've never had

140
00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:33.079
<v Speaker 7>those types of ethics requirements, so that it really is unprecedented.

141
00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:36.279
<v Speaker 7>And I think the question is do Democrats do they

142
00:06:36.279 --> 00:06:39.319
<v Speaker 7>continue to ask for more? And I think Senator Tillis

143
00:06:39.319 --> 00:06:41.319
<v Speaker 7>has actually played a really important role here of trying

144
00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:44.800
<v Speaker 7>to determine what is the appropriate level of requirement and

145
00:06:45.879 --> 00:06:46.920
<v Speaker 7>an ethics obligation.

146
00:06:47.279 --> 00:06:48.439
<v Speaker 6>So he's working through that.

147
00:06:48.480 --> 00:06:51.240
<v Speaker 7>I think he's got a good faith partner with at

148
00:06:51.319 --> 00:06:54.360
<v Speaker 7>least with Senator Gego. The question is how much further,

149
00:06:54.720 --> 00:06:57.639
<v Speaker 7>especially when there's something that will will directly impact the

150
00:06:57.639 --> 00:06:59.920
<v Speaker 7>president and his family, and how do they think about that.

151
00:07:00.120 --> 00:07:02.560
<v Speaker 6>So it's a big question and it's a big ask.

152
00:07:02.480 --> 00:07:05.800
<v Speaker 7>And ultimately I think that this will not be This

153
00:07:05.879 --> 00:07:07.879
<v Speaker 7>may be the final issue that has to be addressed

154
00:07:07.879 --> 00:07:10.920
<v Speaker 7>because it's the last big one. Things like the banks,

155
00:07:10.959 --> 00:07:13.399
<v Speaker 7>and we can get into the issues around rewards and

156
00:07:13.480 --> 00:07:17.079
<v Speaker 7>interest and yield. I think the banks have certainly been

157
00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:21.480
<v Speaker 7>successful in getting the community banks to be really active

158
00:07:21.519 --> 00:07:23.839
<v Speaker 7>on Capitol Hill. I think there's a lot of sympathy

159
00:07:24.040 --> 00:07:27.360
<v Speaker 7>for community banks. I think the larger banks have realized

160
00:07:27.399 --> 00:07:30.279
<v Speaker 7>that and have put the community banks out in front

161
00:07:30.639 --> 00:07:34.000
<v Speaker 7>and then have falled, I guess, kind of fallen back

162
00:07:34.040 --> 00:07:36.600
<v Speaker 7>on the issues around oh, there are no law enforcement

163
00:07:36.600 --> 00:07:39.040
<v Speaker 7>provisions in this bill. That's where the banks have now

164
00:07:39.120 --> 00:07:42.439
<v Speaker 7>taken this. So the bank's issue is certainly still out there.

165
00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:45.120
<v Speaker 7>But I think really, ethics is the issue that all

166
00:07:45.160 --> 00:07:46.439
<v Speaker 7>eyes are watching right now.

167
00:07:46.279 --> 00:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So ethics number one.

168
00:07:47.759 --> 00:07:51.399
<v Speaker 2>But when you listen to Josh Holly, who is most

169
00:07:51.439 --> 00:07:54.319
<v Speaker 2>of the time he's kind of been against crypto, but

170
00:07:54.360 --> 00:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>not for this reason. Right here and now he's talking

171
00:07:57.199 --> 00:08:00.199
<v Speaker 2>about the effect on community banks. To your point point,

172
00:08:00.199 --> 00:08:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the very point you were just making is that the

173
00:08:02.519 --> 00:08:05.360
<v Speaker 2>ABA and the banking lobbies have been very effective, been

174
00:08:05.399 --> 00:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>able to reach some of these senators and lawmakers that

175
00:08:08.600 --> 00:08:11.439
<v Speaker 2>now the community bank issue is coming up. So is

176
00:08:11.480 --> 00:08:14.519
<v Speaker 2>this on Josh Holly's mind to where we would not

177
00:08:14.600 --> 00:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>be able to pivot him to a yes? FO, Do

178
00:08:16.759 --> 00:08:19.879
<v Speaker 2>you feel like that has been kind of the closing

179
00:08:20.519 --> 00:08:22.800
<v Speaker 2>argument for the banks to be able to kind of

180
00:08:22.839 --> 00:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>lock in on some of these Republicans?

181
00:08:26.199 --> 00:08:29.319
<v Speaker 7>You know, Senator Holly is interesting every time we talk

182
00:08:29.360 --> 00:08:31.439
<v Speaker 7>to them, there's a different issue in the office.

183
00:08:31.439 --> 00:08:34.639
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not sure what would get Senator Holly too.

184
00:08:34.720 --> 00:08:38.360
<v Speaker 7>Yes, and that this was the issue that he identified

185
00:08:38.440 --> 00:08:41.320
<v Speaker 7>in public. Great now we know where he stands and

186
00:08:41.360 --> 00:08:43.879
<v Speaker 7>at least what the particular issue is. I think that

187
00:08:43.960 --> 00:08:46.440
<v Speaker 7>at the end of the day, there have not been

188
00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:49.519
<v Speaker 7>solutions proffered by the banks on this. The only solution

189
00:08:49.639 --> 00:08:52.639
<v Speaker 7>that they have offered is to ban third party rewards

190
00:08:52.879 --> 00:08:56.600
<v Speaker 7>because it allows stable coins to directly compete with their

191
00:08:56.639 --> 00:09:00.320
<v Speaker 7>payment operations. So again, this really isn't about deposits, about

192
00:09:00.360 --> 00:09:04.200
<v Speaker 7>their payment and their competition in that and basically.

193
00:09:03.759 --> 00:09:04.799
<v Speaker 6>In that environment.

194
00:09:05.159 --> 00:09:09.840
<v Speaker 7>And so ultimately, with somebody like Senator Holly, you know,

195
00:09:09.879 --> 00:09:12.480
<v Speaker 7>he's making a point, and whether or not he votes

196
00:09:12.519 --> 00:09:13.879
<v Speaker 7>for this bill, I think he's going to have to

197
00:09:13.879 --> 00:09:14.320
<v Speaker 7>look at.

198
00:09:14.200 --> 00:09:14.919
<v Speaker 6>It on the merits.

199
00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:17.320
<v Speaker 7>He's going to have to understand that this is better

200
00:09:17.320 --> 00:09:21.039
<v Speaker 7>for America. You're opening scene with Russia. I mean, this

201
00:09:21.120 --> 00:09:23.879
<v Speaker 7>is at its core a national security bill just as

202
00:09:23.960 --> 00:09:26.720
<v Speaker 7>much as it's a consumer protection bill. America we are

203
00:09:26.879 --> 00:09:29.919
<v Speaker 7>excellent at exporting things like our as we think about

204
00:09:29.919 --> 00:09:33.480
<v Speaker 7>our deepest capital markets and our innovation and our leadership.

205
00:09:33.120 --> 00:09:34.519
<v Speaker 6>But they also look to regulation.

206
00:09:34.799 --> 00:09:37.200
<v Speaker 7>When we passed the Genius Act, all of a sudden,

207
00:09:37.240 --> 00:09:40.159
<v Speaker 7>the rest of the world started taking notice. Central bankers

208
00:09:40.200 --> 00:09:43.279
<v Speaker 7>were caring about this, other regulators were caring about this.

209
00:09:43.559 --> 00:09:49.039
<v Speaker 7>We export good regulation. Instead, you have Russia deciding what's

210
00:09:49.519 --> 00:09:51.360
<v Speaker 7>horrible regulation, and if.

211
00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:53.600
<v Speaker 6>God forbid, other countries start to pick that up.

212
00:09:54.200 --> 00:09:56.279
<v Speaker 7>That's where I think we're That's what I think Senator

213
00:09:56.320 --> 00:09:57.720
<v Speaker 7>Holly is going to have to look at and other

214
00:09:57.759 --> 00:10:00.320
<v Speaker 7>people who are trying to determine what is the best

215
00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:03.840
<v Speaker 7>foundation here in the United States. Do we take an

216
00:10:03.960 --> 00:10:06.519
<v Speaker 7>argument that is not founded in reality that this is

217
00:10:06.559 --> 00:10:09.840
<v Speaker 7>going to impact community bank deposits. We have had stable

218
00:10:09.879 --> 00:10:12.720
<v Speaker 7>coins out there for years, We've been offering rewards for

219
00:10:12.759 --> 00:10:15.159
<v Speaker 7>four years. Genius has been a lot of the land

220
00:10:15.200 --> 00:10:18.559
<v Speaker 7>for over a year now, and deposits have only gone up.

221
00:10:19.240 --> 00:10:22.279
<v Speaker 7>So it doesn't make any sense. It's not founded in reality.

222
00:10:22.799 --> 00:10:24.600
<v Speaker 7>But I get that it's a political problem.

223
00:10:25.320 --> 00:10:27.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I think the argument that the banks and

224
00:10:27.840 --> 00:10:29.399
<v Speaker 2>definitely not on the side of the banks here, but

225
00:10:29.480 --> 00:10:34.960
<v Speaker 2>they yes, you're right, they have seen deposits, depositors going up.

226
00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:37.039
<v Speaker 2>I think it was almost seven percent year of a year,

227
00:10:37.159 --> 00:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>so continue that was JP Morgan. The point is is

228
00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:42.720
<v Speaker 2>that fintech is kind of coming along, whether we see

229
00:10:42.759 --> 00:10:46.639
<v Speaker 2>clarity or not. The other thing that's happening is companies

230
00:10:46.720 --> 00:10:49.399
<v Speaker 2>like Citadel. You've got Jeff Dorman out there kind of

231
00:10:49.399 --> 00:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>attacking on what you guys are doing and blaming Coinbase

232
00:10:53.679 --> 00:10:56.279
<v Speaker 2>that Armstrong was kind of at the core of not

233
00:10:56.320 --> 00:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>getting this across the line. Why do you think we're

234
00:10:58.720 --> 00:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>getting so much pressure, you guys, especially from people like

235
00:11:03.039 --> 00:11:04.559
<v Speaker 2>Citadel and the DTCC.

236
00:11:05.080 --> 00:11:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that is, Well.

237
00:11:07.759 --> 00:11:11.080
<v Speaker 7>It's ironic considering Citadel has had their fair share and

238
00:11:11.120 --> 00:11:13.480
<v Speaker 7>their hand in making this much more difficult to get

239
00:11:13.519 --> 00:11:15.879
<v Speaker 7>across the finish line. So I think that that is

240
00:11:15.919 --> 00:11:19.519
<v Speaker 7>what you're seeing play out in real time on x

241
00:11:19.840 --> 00:11:21.519
<v Speaker 7>is really a reflection of where people come down on

242
00:11:21.559 --> 00:11:24.919
<v Speaker 7>the legislation and Coinbase. There's been nobody at the table

243
00:11:25.039 --> 00:11:27.720
<v Speaker 7>longer than Coinbase. There's been nobody again. I started working

244
00:11:27.759 --> 00:11:31.000
<v Speaker 7>for Coinbase in twenty sixteen, trying to get legislation passed,

245
00:11:31.039 --> 00:11:33.559
<v Speaker 7>trying to get clear rules. So there's no company that's

246
00:11:33.559 --> 00:11:36.120
<v Speaker 7>been at the table longer. I think it's really easy

247
00:11:36.120 --> 00:11:39.240
<v Speaker 7>to have a scapegoat. It's really easy to point fingers

248
00:11:39.240 --> 00:11:42.759
<v Speaker 7>out at one company or any one particular player. But ultimately,

249
00:11:43.080 --> 00:11:46.039
<v Speaker 7>back in January, the bill was not ready for primetime.

250
00:11:46.320 --> 00:11:49.039
<v Speaker 7>And what we have seen is that had we locked

251
00:11:49.080 --> 00:11:53.679
<v Speaker 7>in some really problematic policy, it's so easy for opponents

252
00:11:53.720 --> 00:11:56.320
<v Speaker 7>to fall back on the argument of process. Oh, this

253
00:11:56.440 --> 00:11:58.840
<v Speaker 7>was already passed, this was already part of the debate,

254
00:11:58.879 --> 00:12:02.679
<v Speaker 7>This was already locked in to legislative text. That process point,

255
00:12:03.679 --> 00:12:06.759
<v Speaker 7>we would have handed that process point to opponents. So

256
00:12:06.799 --> 00:12:09.279
<v Speaker 7>I think that we had to take a take action.

257
00:12:09.639 --> 00:12:12.879
<v Speaker 7>That legislation was released with only a few days. It

258
00:12:12.879 --> 00:12:15.399
<v Speaker 7>was released on a Monday night. We really had less

259
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:18.480
<v Speaker 7>than forty eight hours to evaluate a three hundred, four

260
00:12:18.519 --> 00:12:22.080
<v Speaker 7>hundred page bill, and so that you know, that rapid

261
00:12:22.120 --> 00:12:25.840
<v Speaker 7>movement prompted a lot of chaos, and ultimately we feel

262
00:12:25.879 --> 00:12:27.840
<v Speaker 7>like it was in a better place now by far.

263
00:12:28.320 --> 00:12:30.600
<v Speaker 7>But certainly, I mean, we've been working on this for

264
00:12:30.639 --> 00:12:32.879
<v Speaker 7>a long time. It wasn't us who were dragging out

265
00:12:32.879 --> 00:12:36.000
<v Speaker 7>these negotiations on Capitol Hill. I think there were many

266
00:12:36.080 --> 00:12:38.919
<v Speaker 7>other players here. I think the Democrats have a lot

267
00:12:38.960 --> 00:12:41.399
<v Speaker 7>of wins to show for their you know, eight months

268
00:12:41.399 --> 00:12:45.360
<v Speaker 7>of negotiations and nearly four hundred extra pages. I think Republicans,

269
00:12:45.600 --> 00:12:47.799
<v Speaker 7>you know, certainly have also been at the table and

270
00:12:47.879 --> 00:12:50.279
<v Speaker 7>have have fought hard for what they want, and now

271
00:12:50.320 --> 00:12:53.279
<v Speaker 7>you have a bipartisan product that's over six hundred pages long.

272
00:12:53.399 --> 00:12:56.279
<v Speaker 7>So ultimately, you know, we also had a House passed

273
00:12:56.360 --> 00:12:58.440
<v Speaker 7>clarity bill that would have been great. We could have

274
00:12:58.480 --> 00:13:00.679
<v Speaker 7>passed that last year when we passed the Genius Act.

275
00:13:00.919 --> 00:13:03.720
<v Speaker 7>But ultimately, that's how the Senate is. It's deliberative.

276
00:13:04.240 --> 00:13:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is.

277
00:13:05.159 --> 00:13:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And just to remind everybody, the period in which the

278
00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:11.039
<v Speaker 2>Citadel guy was talking about was a period in which

279
00:13:11.080 --> 00:13:14.759
<v Speaker 2>we were seeing the full court pressure on stable coin

280
00:13:15.000 --> 00:13:17.600
<v Speaker 2>yields which was being introduced in that you know in

281
00:13:17.639 --> 00:13:20.440
<v Speaker 2>that text markup that you're mentioning. So why do you

282
00:13:20.480 --> 00:13:24.080
<v Speaker 2>think that Citadel and DTCC have not seen the kind

283
00:13:24.080 --> 00:13:27.600
<v Speaker 2>of backlash because the banks, I think, have seen the

284
00:13:27.639 --> 00:13:29.840
<v Speaker 2>backlash from the industry. But if you look at some

285
00:13:29.879 --> 00:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of these kind of pseudo financial institutions that could also

286
00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>plan this, why aren't they getting the heat.

287
00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a good question.

288
00:13:38.440 --> 00:13:41.120
<v Speaker 7>And just to go back for a second, back to January,

289
00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:43.600
<v Speaker 7>it's a really good point. The provision that would have

290
00:13:43.720 --> 00:13:47.000
<v Speaker 7>passed and would have been incredibly difficult to unwind, would

291
00:13:47.039 --> 00:13:49.759
<v Speaker 7>have killed third party rewards. You couldn't have gone to

292
00:13:49.799 --> 00:13:52.960
<v Speaker 7>use stable coins and got a balloon, as you know,

293
00:13:53.000 --> 00:13:55.360
<v Speaker 7>as a reward in your local merchant shop.

294
00:13:55.440 --> 00:13:58.799
<v Speaker 6>That would have been banned like that is insanity.

295
00:13:58.279 --> 00:14:00.840
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to just pure competition, free markets, and

296
00:14:00.879 --> 00:14:05.200
<v Speaker 7>open innovation. So we really, as I think as a

297
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:07.480
<v Speaker 7>company that is built on that and really believes in

298
00:14:07.720 --> 00:14:11.080
<v Speaker 7>our mission is economic freedom. That just ran counter to

299
00:14:11.120 --> 00:14:14.279
<v Speaker 7>everything we knew, and so we felt very strongly that

300
00:14:14.279 --> 00:14:15.799
<v Speaker 7>that that we needed to take a stand then for

301
00:14:15.840 --> 00:14:19.600
<v Speaker 7>our customers and frankly for the innovation itself. And back

302
00:14:19.639 --> 00:14:21.519
<v Speaker 7>to your question about why, why do I think some

303
00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:23.919
<v Speaker 7>of these other players who have had I think shadow

304
00:14:24.039 --> 00:14:26.799
<v Speaker 7>operations to make this bill really difficult. I think at

305
00:14:26.840 --> 00:14:30.120
<v Speaker 7>the end of the day, it's this is a disruptive technology,

306
00:14:30.480 --> 00:14:32.879
<v Speaker 7>and we saw that fight play out in some of

307
00:14:32.919 --> 00:14:35.240
<v Speaker 7>the some of the other sections of the bill. When

308
00:14:35.240 --> 00:14:38.440
<v Speaker 7>we thought about securities laws, what does a security like

309
00:14:38.519 --> 00:14:41.159
<v Speaker 7>what that bill back in January would have done was

310
00:14:41.200 --> 00:14:44.840
<v Speaker 7>basically said, any new rules have to be identical to

311
00:14:44.879 --> 00:14:48.919
<v Speaker 7>the old rules for securities. Well, if the old rules worked,

312
00:14:49.120 --> 00:14:51.679
<v Speaker 7>we wouldn't be trying to make fit for purpose rules.

313
00:14:52.039 --> 00:14:56.000
<v Speaker 7>And so there was the incumbent industry was very interested

314
00:14:56.039 --> 00:14:59.759
<v Speaker 7>in locking in everybody into the same old rules where

315
00:14:59.799 --> 00:15:02.600
<v Speaker 7>you have regulatory capture, and that, ultimately, I think is

316
00:15:02.600 --> 00:15:06.240
<v Speaker 7>where the industry came together. At the end of the day,

317
00:15:06.399 --> 00:15:09.559
<v Speaker 7>I've never seen the crypto industry so united. It actually

318
00:15:09.639 --> 00:15:14.399
<v Speaker 7>brought everybody together to fight as as finally an industry

319
00:15:14.440 --> 00:15:17.159
<v Speaker 7>that wanted, you know, a singular purpose, which was to

320
00:15:17.159 --> 00:15:19.759
<v Speaker 7>get fit for purpose rules. So ultimately it brought the

321
00:15:19.759 --> 00:15:23.399
<v Speaker 7>industry together. I think you see the where all the

322
00:15:23.440 --> 00:15:25.679
<v Speaker 7>different places that are being disrupted is where you're seeing

323
00:15:25.679 --> 00:15:28.559
<v Speaker 7>the most concerted effort to pose this film.

324
00:15:28.639 --> 00:15:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure.

325
00:15:29.759 --> 00:15:33.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, and obviously the banking efforts that you know, we've

326
00:15:33.080 --> 00:15:37.480
<v Speaker 2>been covering this for many years, and I myself have

327
00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>been surprised because you know, we've been in media for

328
00:15:40.360 --> 00:15:42.279
<v Speaker 2>a couple of decades, so I've seen a lot of

329
00:15:42.320 --> 00:15:45.919
<v Speaker 2>the let's just call it the pr strategies that many

330
00:15:45.960 --> 00:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>of these lobbies will take. And the one that has

331
00:15:49.159 --> 00:15:53.159
<v Speaker 2>surprised me the most has been the ABA. I mean

332
00:15:53.200 --> 00:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>they have got like data scientists or somebody up there

333
00:15:56.919 --> 00:16:00.279
<v Speaker 2>understanding exactly where to push buttons and pull triggers. I

334
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:02.919
<v Speaker 2>was looking at this here recently. This came in from

335
00:16:02.960 --> 00:16:05.559
<v Speaker 2>punch Bowl and it was in reference to Rob Nichols.

336
00:16:05.559 --> 00:16:08.519
<v Speaker 2>This is the president of the ABA, and of course

337
00:16:08.559 --> 00:16:12.679
<v Speaker 2>he's commenting on guess what the editorial that the Wall

338
00:16:12.679 --> 00:16:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal put out by guess who the editorial board?

339
00:16:16.679 --> 00:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Interesting that we don't really know who the editorial board is.

340
00:16:20.440 --> 00:16:22.440
<v Speaker 2>But the point is is that you're getting that kind

341
00:16:22.480 --> 00:16:25.519
<v Speaker 2>of pressure right now. Who would be writing these kinds

342
00:16:25.559 --> 00:16:28.919
<v Speaker 2>of things. Is this a seeded article from probably the ABA,

343
00:16:29.120 --> 00:16:30.639
<v Speaker 2>or how does this get hapend to here?

344
00:16:31.159 --> 00:16:35.559
<v Speaker 7>The talking points were almost identical to the letter that

345
00:16:35.639 --> 00:16:38.639
<v Speaker 7>Rob Nichols sent you a few months ago, and the

346
00:16:38.720 --> 00:16:42.600
<v Speaker 7>idea that again that this is a systemically risky endeavor

347
00:16:42.639 --> 00:16:45.519
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to stable coins, when that there's no

348
00:16:45.639 --> 00:16:49.159
<v Speaker 7>law enforcement protections in this bill, that there's concerns about DeFi,

349
00:16:49.799 --> 00:16:52.399
<v Speaker 7>all of these, all of these issues that were raised

350
00:16:52.720 --> 00:16:56.000
<v Speaker 7>truly read like the ABA or the BPI website, and

351
00:16:56.080 --> 00:16:59.039
<v Speaker 7>so of course we're skeptical when we see that because

352
00:16:59.440 --> 00:17:01.559
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't look like it's an unbiased approach.

353
00:17:01.639 --> 00:17:02.159
<v Speaker 6>And then you have.

354
00:17:02.159 --> 00:17:06.000
<v Speaker 7>Brendan being you know, Rob retweeting Brendan because Brendan had

355
00:17:06.039 --> 00:17:09.559
<v Speaker 7>a point of view, and then Brendan retweeting Rob who

356
00:17:09.640 --> 00:17:11.880
<v Speaker 7>had a similar point of view. It was an interesting

357
00:17:11.960 --> 00:17:14.960
<v Speaker 7>dynamic that we saw, but the editorial board, it was

358
00:17:15.000 --> 00:17:18.400
<v Speaker 7>frustrating because it didn't feel like an open and certainly

359
00:17:18.839 --> 00:17:22.000
<v Speaker 7>we didn't have any kind of contact leading into that

360
00:17:22.079 --> 00:17:25.039
<v Speaker 7>type of a conversation so or into that into that article.

361
00:17:25.160 --> 00:17:27.880
<v Speaker 6>So I would just caution everybody.

362
00:17:27.599 --> 00:17:31.160
<v Speaker 7>As you read it to understand where these talking points

363
00:17:31.200 --> 00:17:33.920
<v Speaker 7>came from. Throw it into your favorite to your favorite

364
00:17:34.000 --> 00:17:35.559
<v Speaker 7>LM and discover.

365
00:17:35.240 --> 00:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And do a comparison.

366
00:17:37.920 --> 00:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the comparison of the two of the two pr positions, And.

367
00:17:41.880 --> 00:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>You might be right.

368
00:17:42.599 --> 00:17:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I liked your you guys's response on this. You know

369
00:17:45.440 --> 00:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>what's kind of an in uh. I guess poking and

370
00:17:48.759 --> 00:17:51.359
<v Speaker 2>fun at it fixed it there on. We're afraid of competition,

371
00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:53.559
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, we get it, we get it.

372
00:17:53.640 --> 00:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about our favorite senator now, and that of

373
00:17:57.279 --> 00:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>course is Senator Warren. And Warren came out. I feel

374
00:18:02.160 --> 00:18:03.720
<v Speaker 2>like this was a little bit of a gas light.

375
00:18:03.759 --> 00:18:06.440
<v Speaker 2>But she, of course is making her points known again

376
00:18:07.000 --> 00:18:09.839
<v Speaker 2>the day before we're trying to get a vote across

377
00:18:09.880 --> 00:18:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the line.

378
00:18:10.240 --> 00:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Watch this clip.

379
00:18:11.559 --> 00:18:14.200
<v Speaker 7>Do you think there's anything that could happen to change

380
00:18:14.240 --> 00:18:16.480
<v Speaker 7>it so that it would be appeasing to you in

381
00:18:16.559 --> 00:18:16.960
<v Speaker 7>any way?

382
00:18:17.079 --> 00:18:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Of course, we need crypto legislation. I've been saying this

383
00:18:21.920 --> 00:18:24.400
<v Speaker 4>for a long time. I put together a crypto bill. Yes,

384
00:18:24.440 --> 00:18:30.319
<v Speaker 4>we need crypto legislation, but not this legislation. As far

385
00:18:30.359 --> 00:18:34.319
<v Speaker 4>as I've heard, they've still not solved the problem of

386
00:18:34.480 --> 00:18:41.519
<v Speaker 4>corruption of consumer, protection of national security, or protecting our economy.

387
00:18:41.640 --> 00:18:44.839
<v Speaker 4>And until you solve those problems. I just don't see

388
00:18:44.920 --> 00:18:49.400
<v Speaker 4>how anyone Democrat or Republican moves forward on this bill.

389
00:18:49.599 --> 00:18:52.480
<v Speaker 6>Are you worried that the industry will leave the United States?

390
00:18:53.160 --> 00:18:55.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't even know what that means. You mean that

391
00:18:55.200 --> 00:18:58.039
<v Speaker 4>they will do their money laundering overseas?

392
00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:02.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, So obviously the gas lighting continues from Senator Warren.

393
00:19:02.440 --> 00:19:05.519
<v Speaker 2>She's a master at it, very good. I think most

394
00:19:05.559 --> 00:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of those points have been debunked, and that is, of course,

395
00:19:08.039 --> 00:19:11.119
<v Speaker 2>the ethics issue that was an issue has now started

396
00:19:11.160 --> 00:19:13.400
<v Speaker 2>to draw down to almost no issue. And of course

397
00:19:13.440 --> 00:19:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the national security has mostly been on the flip side,

398
00:19:16.240 --> 00:19:18.759
<v Speaker 2>is that this is good for national security. There's a

399
00:19:18.839 --> 00:19:22.759
<v Speaker 2>lot of benefits to this and innovation, Yeah, that can

400
00:19:22.839 --> 00:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>still leave the shores, and we are already starting to

401
00:19:25.240 --> 00:19:28.400
<v Speaker 2>see it. I would ask, why are we not seeing

402
00:19:28.440 --> 00:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>some sort of correlation to what's happening in Japan or

403
00:19:31.160 --> 00:19:33.480
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in Europe with Mika. I mean, those are

404
00:19:33.519 --> 00:19:38.400
<v Speaker 2>two simple, non you know, bad countries out there and

405
00:19:38.599 --> 00:19:41.319
<v Speaker 2>areas and regions that have been able to come to

406
00:19:41.440 --> 00:19:44.359
<v Speaker 2>some sort of alignment for the industry. So what do

407
00:19:44.400 --> 00:19:46.400
<v Speaker 2>you think about her continued push on this?

408
00:19:47.240 --> 00:19:51.079
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So again going back to your very first clip

409
00:19:52.119 --> 00:19:57.000
<v Speaker 7>on the Russia regulations. I think if Elizabeth Warren had

410
00:19:57.039 --> 00:19:58.119
<v Speaker 7>her brothers, it.

411
00:19:58.039 --> 00:19:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Would look a whole lot like the Russia.

412
00:20:00.319 --> 00:20:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

413
00:20:00.680 --> 00:20:03.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And if you look back at her crypto bill,

414
00:20:03.799 --> 00:20:07.680
<v Speaker 7>her crypto bill was the Digital Asset Gosh, I'd have

415
00:20:07.720 --> 00:20:11.960
<v Speaker 7>to remember it's Damla and not a very good name

416
00:20:12.000 --> 00:20:14.000
<v Speaker 7>and not a very good bill. It looked a whole

417
00:20:14.039 --> 00:20:17.400
<v Speaker 7>lot like the Russia bill and the regulation. So if

418
00:20:17.400 --> 00:20:20.640
<v Speaker 7>that's Elizabeth Warren's, if that's the way she thinks that

419
00:20:20.640 --> 00:20:24.039
<v Speaker 7>we're going to solve crypto and the need for regulation,

420
00:20:24.640 --> 00:20:27.559
<v Speaker 7>she is completely missing the point. She is missing the

421
00:20:27.599 --> 00:20:30.480
<v Speaker 7>point that this is actually good for consumers, that people

422
00:20:30.599 --> 00:20:34.039
<v Speaker 7>want something that's better, faster, cheaper, has less lock in,

423
00:20:34.160 --> 00:20:37.839
<v Speaker 7>better access, and ultimately then it's just back to control.

424
00:20:37.960 --> 00:20:40.640
<v Speaker 7>It's the fact that just like in Russia, they want

425
00:20:40.640 --> 00:20:44.000
<v Speaker 7>to control who accesses this, how much you spend on it, how.

426
00:20:43.880 --> 00:20:45.240
<v Speaker 6>You do it, when you do it.

427
00:20:45.599 --> 00:20:50.000
<v Speaker 7>That is not America. So ultimately I think that she

428
00:20:50.599 --> 00:20:52.720
<v Speaker 7>has no interest in looking at the places that are

429
00:20:52.720 --> 00:20:56.599
<v Speaker 7>doing it well because ultimately that undermines her argument that this.

430
00:20:56.640 --> 00:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Can be for sure. Yeah, exactly.

431
00:20:59.160 --> 00:21:01.200
<v Speaker 2>It does put her in a position that she doesn't

432
00:21:01.279 --> 00:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>usually have, which is facts, a position of facts.

433
00:21:05.559 --> 00:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, they usually come into play.

434
00:21:08.000 --> 00:21:09.839
<v Speaker 2>Hey, I want to go over to another clip here

435
00:21:09.880 --> 00:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>because this gets into the issue that we're faced right

436
00:21:12.720 --> 00:21:16.319
<v Speaker 2>now with the Republicans. This is Tim Scott and he

437
00:21:16.440 --> 00:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>talks about a few things he gets into the banks

438
00:21:19.000 --> 00:21:22.039
<v Speaker 2>a little bit or kind of This is Barbaroma talking

439
00:21:22.079 --> 00:21:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to him about this.

440
00:21:22.759 --> 00:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Take a look or.

441
00:21:24.400 --> 00:21:26.839
<v Speaker 8>Is it largely with Josh Holly is worried about and

442
00:21:26.839 --> 00:21:29.039
<v Speaker 8>that is what the banks have to say about the

443
00:21:29.079 --> 00:21:30.000
<v Speaker 8>crypto platforms.

444
00:21:30.039 --> 00:21:30.799
<v Speaker 4>What's holding it up?

445
00:21:31.000 --> 00:21:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, Maria, the truth of the matter is that Democrats

446
00:21:33.240 --> 00:21:36.319
<v Speaker 3>have been stonewalling for a year now. Every time we

447
00:21:36.400 --> 00:21:40.519
<v Speaker 3>say yes, they moved the goalpost. When Banking Committee Republicans

448
00:21:40.599 --> 00:21:44.400
<v Speaker 3>coalesced around the bill, everyone getting in line, than we

449
00:21:44.400 --> 00:21:46.960
<v Speaker 3>were able to get Democrats to come aboard. We'll do

450
00:21:47.039 --> 00:21:50.079
<v Speaker 3>the same type of strategy once we have the vast

451
00:21:50.079 --> 00:21:53.519
<v Speaker 3>majority of Republicans saying yes. I believe the Democrats come

452
00:21:53.559 --> 00:21:55.519
<v Speaker 3>to the table and find a way to yes.

453
00:21:55.960 --> 00:21:58.640
<v Speaker 8>But the Republicans are not all on board, right because

454
00:21:58.680 --> 00:22:01.359
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you've got Mitch mcconna, you've got Josh Holly

455
00:22:01.400 --> 00:22:03.839
<v Speaker 8>who says he's not going to vote yes because of

456
00:22:03.880 --> 00:22:06.400
<v Speaker 8>what the concerns are from the banking sector. You've got

457
00:22:06.440 --> 00:22:09.599
<v Speaker 8>Susan Collins that we're watching. What do you want to

458
00:22:09.599 --> 00:22:11.880
<v Speaker 8>say in terms of the Republican support behind.

459
00:22:11.599 --> 00:22:17.119
<v Speaker 3>This, Well, listen, I worked on Republican members yesterday. We

460
00:22:17.240 --> 00:22:21.920
<v Speaker 3>made progress on the issue of rewards. Right now, Maria,

461
00:22:22.440 --> 00:22:26.599
<v Speaker 3>crypto firms can do anything they want because there is

462
00:22:26.640 --> 00:22:29.000
<v Speaker 3>no regulatory standard that's for rewards.

463
00:22:29.160 --> 00:22:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great point, right, let me move on,

464
00:22:31.440 --> 00:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>all right, So Scott kind of defending right now on

465
00:22:34.119 --> 00:22:36.119
<v Speaker 2>his heels a little bit there with the issue on

466
00:22:36.200 --> 00:22:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Republicans because there have been a few that we kind

467
00:22:39.519 --> 00:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>of knew where you Rampaul landed were kind of Josh

468
00:22:42.960 --> 00:22:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Holly landed. Those weren't expected votes, but there was a

469
00:22:45.920 --> 00:22:49.079
<v Speaker 2>handful that are kind of on the bubble right now.

470
00:22:49.400 --> 00:22:51.519
<v Speaker 2>When you look at that, and remember, he hasn't failed.

471
00:22:51.559 --> 00:22:53.839
<v Speaker 2>He didn't say anything about the banks. He was just

472
00:22:53.880 --> 00:22:54.920
<v Speaker 2>pointed to the Democrats.

473
00:22:55.319 --> 00:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm like, what are the bankers doing right now?

474
00:22:57.200 --> 00:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the ABA doing right now?

475
00:22:58.519 --> 00:22:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Kara?

476
00:22:58.799 --> 00:23:03.519
<v Speaker 2>Your team is probably ready for everything, aren't they.

477
00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:07.960
<v Speaker 7>They are canvassing, and let's be clear, the bankers are powerful.

478
00:23:08.000 --> 00:23:10.920
<v Speaker 7>They're formidable. They have a banker in every community. They

479
00:23:10.920 --> 00:23:13.200
<v Speaker 7>have a banker with the cell phone of every senator.

480
00:23:13.519 --> 00:23:17.079
<v Speaker 7>They have somebody who probably helped them when they were

481
00:23:17.160 --> 00:23:21.240
<v Speaker 7>running for city council. So the bankers actually have a

482
00:23:21.480 --> 00:23:23.960
<v Speaker 7>very long standing relationship with a lot of these members

483
00:23:23.960 --> 00:23:26.440
<v Speaker 7>and their staff. I think it's interesting, though. We were

484
00:23:26.440 --> 00:23:28.480
<v Speaker 7>in a meeting the other day and they said, all

485
00:23:28.519 --> 00:23:29.720
<v Speaker 7>we're hearing from is bankers.

486
00:23:30.240 --> 00:23:31.960
<v Speaker 6>We're not hearing from the crypto community.

487
00:23:32.279 --> 00:23:34.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, it turns out thirty thousand emails have gone in

488
00:23:34.960 --> 00:23:37.960
<v Speaker 7>to that office. There have been over a million emails

489
00:23:38.000 --> 00:23:41.839
<v Speaker 7>going in from every day American voters who care about

490
00:23:41.880 --> 00:23:44.759
<v Speaker 7>this bill, just in the last week. I believe I'll

491
00:23:44.799 --> 00:23:46.079
<v Speaker 7>have to check a stand with crypto, but I think

492
00:23:46.119 --> 00:23:49.720
<v Speaker 7>they said they had something like twenty five hundred calls. Calls,

493
00:23:49.720 --> 00:23:52.640
<v Speaker 7>not emails, not form letters, calls go in and say

494
00:23:52.640 --> 00:23:54.400
<v Speaker 7>that we care about this bill and we want it

495
00:23:54.440 --> 00:23:56.880
<v Speaker 7>to pass because we think about crypto as part of

496
00:23:56.920 --> 00:24:01.200
<v Speaker 7>our economic freedom, our financial abilities, our access. So it's

497
00:24:01.319 --> 00:24:04.200
<v Speaker 7>just an imbalance in terms of who you have making

498
00:24:04.279 --> 00:24:07.480
<v Speaker 7>those calls, and bankers are turning up the heat, not

499
00:24:08.960 --> 00:24:12.839
<v Speaker 7>fading away. I think ultimately there are Republicans who have

500
00:24:13.000 --> 00:24:17.599
<v Speaker 7>been and continue to be concerned about where this deal

501
00:24:17.680 --> 00:24:20.480
<v Speaker 7>is landing. Ultimately, though when we talk to them, and

502
00:24:20.519 --> 00:24:23.799
<v Speaker 7>we say, talk to Senator Tillis, understand how we went

503
00:24:23.880 --> 00:24:28.279
<v Speaker 7>for six months in negotiating what ultimately landed in the

504
00:24:28.319 --> 00:24:29.079
<v Speaker 7>rewards section.

505
00:24:29.759 --> 00:24:30.519
<v Speaker 6>The banks never.

506
00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:32.839
<v Speaker 7>Showed up, Not a single CEO showed up to have

507
00:24:32.839 --> 00:24:37.440
<v Speaker 7>those conversations. Minded My chief legal officer was there to

508
00:24:37.480 --> 00:24:40.960
<v Speaker 7>negotiate it. We showed up every time, and the banks didn't.

509
00:24:41.079 --> 00:24:44.400
<v Speaker 7>And so when we think about where we landed, ultimately,

510
00:24:44.599 --> 00:24:48.680
<v Speaker 7>the rewards allows for third party rewards for activity, not

511
00:24:48.839 --> 00:24:51.960
<v Speaker 7>for holding, not for anything that is functionally or economically

512
00:24:52.039 --> 00:24:55.519
<v Speaker 7>equivalent to a deposit. That is, it's airtight. There's no

513
00:24:55.559 --> 00:24:58.240
<v Speaker 7>way to get around it. So ultimately, when you think

514
00:24:58.240 --> 00:25:00.400
<v Speaker 7>about how this is going to shape up, it's not

515
00:25:00.440 --> 00:25:03.720
<v Speaker 7>competing with deposits. It's competing with other things that people want.

516
00:25:03.799 --> 00:25:06.640
<v Speaker 7>It's competing with high yield savings accounts, or competing with

517
00:25:06.680 --> 00:25:09.559
<v Speaker 7>money mutual fund money market mutual funds, or it's competing

518
00:25:09.559 --> 00:25:12.640
<v Speaker 7>with just the ability to use collateral and the ability

519
00:25:12.640 --> 00:25:15.359
<v Speaker 7>to go out and actually make trades and wait for

520
00:25:15.440 --> 00:25:17.680
<v Speaker 7>a sale. Those are the types of things that people

521
00:25:17.720 --> 00:25:20.759
<v Speaker 7>want to do, and the banks don't like it. It's

522
00:25:20.839 --> 00:25:22.160
<v Speaker 7>truly not about deposits.

523
00:25:22.480 --> 00:25:22.799
<v Speaker 1>All right.

524
00:25:22.839 --> 00:25:24.119
<v Speaker 2>I know you're on a hard stop, but I want

525
00:25:24.119 --> 00:25:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to play this last clip because I have one last

526
00:25:25.960 --> 00:25:29.799
<v Speaker 2>question for you, and this is Scaramuccia Novograt's kind of

527
00:25:29.839 --> 00:25:31.799
<v Speaker 2>touching on this point, and then I'll go to the question.

528
00:25:31.839 --> 00:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Here we go.

529
00:25:32.960 --> 00:25:36.960
<v Speaker 9>But I fear that Trump doesn't want this to pass

530
00:25:37.119 --> 00:25:39.160
<v Speaker 9>because he wants to be able to say, hey, it's

531
00:25:39.200 --> 00:25:41.279
<v Speaker 9>the Democrat's fault. And I don't think he's going to

532
00:25:41.279 --> 00:25:43.000
<v Speaker 9>be able to. I think Tillis has boxed them in.

533
00:25:43.359 --> 00:25:46.319
<v Speaker 9>It's a very fair compromise on ethics. And quite frankly,

534
00:25:46.319 --> 00:25:50.000
<v Speaker 9>Trump already did his two mean coins, and he's got immunity,

535
00:25:50.400 --> 00:25:52.559
<v Speaker 9>you know, and so he's not really this is just ego.

536
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You read the two.

537
00:25:53.519 --> 00:25:55.799
<v Speaker 9>You can't retell the difference other than it allows the

538
00:25:55.880 --> 00:25:58.759
<v Speaker 9>state attorney general not to shoot the individuals, but to

539
00:25:58.799 --> 00:26:01.559
<v Speaker 9>suit the DOJ. You know, you and I could negotiate

540
00:26:01.599 --> 00:26:04.759
<v Speaker 9>that thing tomorrow if you got permission from your buddy,

541
00:26:04.799 --> 00:26:07.519
<v Speaker 9>the president. If the Republicans don't put on the floor,

542
00:26:07.839 --> 00:26:10.000
<v Speaker 9>it's because they know the version they're going to put

543
00:26:10.079 --> 00:26:13.319
<v Speaker 9>isn't even get their fifty of their guys, right, fifty

544
00:26:13.359 --> 00:26:16.160
<v Speaker 9>to fifty chants that they do. You're still bullish that

545
00:26:16.240 --> 00:26:18.599
<v Speaker 9>this gets done in twenty twenty six.

546
00:26:18.920 --> 00:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I am, all right, it's just to me. I just

547
00:26:21.720 --> 00:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>would be a big shout out to the crypto bros

548
00:26:24.240 --> 00:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>out there.

549
00:26:24.759 --> 00:26:26.400
<v Speaker 9>Don't give any money to these people if they're not

550
00:26:26.440 --> 00:26:28.480
<v Speaker 9>going to put it on the floor, and then they're

551
00:26:28.480 --> 00:26:29.759
<v Speaker 9>going to blame the Democrats.

552
00:26:29.799 --> 00:26:31.039
<v Speaker 1>Don't give the money to the people.

553
00:26:31.079 --> 00:26:32.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, be smarter than that.

554
00:26:32.759 --> 00:26:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

555
00:26:33.160 --> 00:26:36.359
<v Speaker 9>I just don't think that's the winning strategy for the industry,

556
00:26:37.279 --> 00:26:37.559
<v Speaker 9>all right.

557
00:26:37.640 --> 00:26:39.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's my question is how do you respond to that?

558
00:26:40.000 --> 00:26:43.279
<v Speaker 2>If if Tillis doesn't even get this thing to the floor,

559
00:26:43.920 --> 00:26:48.160
<v Speaker 2>what happens post this fallout coming mid terms? How would

560
00:26:48.160 --> 00:26:50.039
<v Speaker 2>the how do you think the industry is going to

561
00:26:50.079 --> 00:26:52.200
<v Speaker 2>respond to this, especially with these Republicans.

562
00:26:52.720 --> 00:26:53.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a good question.

563
00:26:54.200 --> 00:26:56.880
<v Speaker 7>And first I just want to say, with Anthony's mention

564
00:26:56.920 --> 00:26:59.680
<v Speaker 7>of crypto bros, it actually goes back to the editorial

565
00:26:59.680 --> 00:27:02.720
<v Speaker 7>where they said crypto boys, the crypto boys out there.

566
00:27:02.799 --> 00:27:04.559
<v Speaker 7>I just want to flag that I am not a

567
00:27:04.559 --> 00:27:07.400
<v Speaker 7>crypto boy. I've been doing this for ten years, so

568
00:27:07.839 --> 00:27:10.759
<v Speaker 7>I wanted to highlight that. But ultimately, you know, I

569
00:27:10.799 --> 00:27:14.160
<v Speaker 7>think that there is a big question about what happens politically.

570
00:27:14.559 --> 00:27:18.200
<v Speaker 7>This is something that the crypto industry established three years ago.

571
00:27:18.240 --> 00:27:20.480
<v Speaker 7>Now in terms of stand with crypto, I think the

572
00:27:20.519 --> 00:27:23.079
<v Speaker 7>superpower is the fact that you've got three million people

573
00:27:23.319 --> 00:27:26.799
<v Speaker 7>who are voters who care deeply about who is procrypto

574
00:27:26.799 --> 00:27:31.599
<v Speaker 7>and who isn't. Those ratings on standwthcrypto dot org. People

575
00:27:31.640 --> 00:27:33.359
<v Speaker 7>go and look at those and they care about there

576
00:27:33.400 --> 00:27:36.039
<v Speaker 7>there's a voter's hub. So I think that the crypto

577
00:27:36.160 --> 00:27:38.480
<v Speaker 7>voter is going to play a very important role here.

578
00:27:38.720 --> 00:27:42.319
<v Speaker 7>But ultimately, shiny object is money, right, It's all about

579
00:27:42.319 --> 00:27:44.400
<v Speaker 7>the super PAC. It's all about where the super PACs

580
00:27:44.400 --> 00:27:46.920
<v Speaker 7>spent in twenty four, where the super pac will spend

581
00:27:46.920 --> 00:27:49.880
<v Speaker 7>in twenty six, And ultimately I think that that is

582
00:27:50.079 --> 00:27:53.640
<v Speaker 7>that's still up for grabs. Ultimately, the design is to

583
00:27:53.680 --> 00:27:56.799
<v Speaker 7>get legislation passed. That was the goal of the super PAC.

584
00:27:56.880 --> 00:27:59.599
<v Speaker 7>That's the goal of everybody who's involved, is to get

585
00:27:59.599 --> 00:28:02.759
<v Speaker 7>clear rules in the United States. And if you have blockers,

586
00:28:03.039 --> 00:28:05.599
<v Speaker 7>that's a problem. We need people who want to get

587
00:28:05.599 --> 00:28:07.720
<v Speaker 7>this passed. And so once we see what happens over

588
00:28:07.759 --> 00:28:11.319
<v Speaker 7>the weekend and into September, hopefully, I think it will

589
00:28:11.319 --> 00:28:13.240
<v Speaker 7>become more clear what the political strategy is.

590
00:28:13.519 --> 00:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>So do you think that if they do stretch this

591
00:28:16.680 --> 00:28:18.559
<v Speaker 2>into the weekend, because many people have said this is

592
00:28:18.559 --> 00:28:21.559
<v Speaker 2>going to take longer than just Saturday and Sunday, do

593
00:28:21.599 --> 00:28:25.319
<v Speaker 2>you think there's still a possibility past the August recess.

594
00:28:26.599 --> 00:28:28.680
<v Speaker 6>I do, but I think it has to be I

595
00:28:28.680 --> 00:28:29.880
<v Speaker 6>think we have to get started.

596
00:28:30.079 --> 00:28:32.160
<v Speaker 7>I think the idea that this will just be delayed

597
00:28:32.160 --> 00:28:36.200
<v Speaker 7>inevitably is a really hard one, especially because we've been

598
00:28:36.200 --> 00:28:39.440
<v Speaker 7>pushing for a floor time since May. Since the minute

599
00:28:39.440 --> 00:28:41.960
<v Speaker 7>it passed the Banking Committee, we have been pushing to

600
00:28:41.960 --> 00:28:44.440
<v Speaker 7>get on the floor, and so ultimately I think that

601
00:28:44.519 --> 00:28:47.240
<v Speaker 7>it does need to get started. I think we have

602
00:28:47.279 --> 00:28:49.759
<v Speaker 7>to call the question. We have to see where people are.

603
00:28:50.000 --> 00:28:52.359
<v Speaker 7>There are issues out there that are going to hang

604
00:28:52.400 --> 00:28:53.839
<v Speaker 7>out there until.

605
00:28:53.559 --> 00:28:54.359
<v Speaker 6>The vote is called.

606
00:28:54.559 --> 00:28:57.319
<v Speaker 7>People just don't put down their pens in Washington and

607
00:28:57.400 --> 00:28:59.920
<v Speaker 7>stop stop trying to negotiate. That's not how it works.

608
00:29:00.480 --> 00:29:03.079
<v Speaker 7>People negotiate a very last second to get as much

609
00:29:03.079 --> 00:29:05.759
<v Speaker 7>as they possibly can. So ultimately we're going to have

610
00:29:05.799 --> 00:29:07.799
<v Speaker 7>to the leadership is going to have to save pens down.

611
00:29:08.200 --> 00:29:08.599
<v Speaker 6>We're done.

612
00:29:08.720 --> 00:29:11.279
<v Speaker 7>We've got an ethics deal. We've got everything else lined

613
00:29:11.319 --> 00:29:13.279
<v Speaker 7>up and we're going, Yeah.

614
00:29:12.960 --> 00:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

615
00:29:13.759 --> 00:29:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Carot.

616
00:29:14.000 --> 00:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It's been good talking to you. Thank you so much.

617
00:29:15.960 --> 00:29:18.559
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be covering this very tightly over the

618
00:29:18.559 --> 00:29:20.839
<v Speaker 2>next few days, so stay tuned for all that.

619
00:29:20.920 --> 00:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But thanks for stopping it today. We appreciate it, love it.

620
00:29:23.400 --> 00:29:24.279
<v Speaker 6>Thanks so much for having me.

621
00:29:31.039 --> 00:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>If you like this.

622
00:29:31.680 --> 00:29:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Video, like and subscribe, drop a comment down below, and

623
00:29:34.960 --> 00:29:37.200
<v Speaker 2>also join our free private member group.

624
00:29:37.480 --> 00:29:38.599
<v Speaker 1>The link is in the description
