Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As o'clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 1: it's Monday, the seventeenth of November. We have our Lord
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five. Well, we're starting to see some unraveling
Speaker 1: of the Maga cult and I'm very optimistic about this.
Speaker 1: We'll see what happens with it. But could it be
Speaker 1: that there is a silver lining to Trump, just like
Speaker 1: there was a silver lining to the lockdowns. He had
Speaker 1: a lot of parents who you could talk to them,
Speaker 1: you could reason with them, but they could never see
Speaker 1: what was happening in the school until the lockdown, and
Speaker 1: then finally one thing woke them up. And so we'll
Speaker 1: see if this is going to be what has been
Speaker 1: happening this last week with Trump. He completely lost it
Speaker 1: over the weekend. We're going to begin with the Epstein
Speaker 1: stuff and then we'll talk about how Trump is eating
Speaker 1: his own and then we've got a lot to talk
Speaker 1: about in terms of the fourth Turning. We are getting
Speaker 1: at the tail end of the fourth turning, and folks,
Speaker 1: things are really going to accelerate fast. We've kind of
Speaker 1: gone over the event horizon of this black hole and
Speaker 1: some really strange things are going to happen. And there's
Speaker 1: a couple of different scenarios we're going to talk about
Speaker 1: and what you might want to do in each of
Speaker 1: these scenarios, as well as the scenario of aiw rightening
Speaker 1: crazy plans from Elon Musk. We'll be right back. Well,
Speaker 1: I'll begin with OJ Simpson because there's just been a
Speaker 1: settlement now for the O. J. Simpson estate. Long ago
Speaker 1: the Goldman Ron Goldman's family won a settlement and a
Speaker 1: civil lawsuit against O. J. Simpson, and of course, you know,
Speaker 1: we saw jury nullification at its worst. That was one
Speaker 1: of the problems with that. Jury nullification is very very
Speaker 1: important for nullifying and out of controlled government. And yet
Speaker 1: what this jury did was they allowed a known murder
Speaker 1: to go free because they liked him better than they
Speaker 1: liked the police or whatever the reasons were. This is
Speaker 1: where the Cardassians got started. I guess you know their
Speaker 1: father was the lawyer representing him. But for most of
Speaker 1: the country, we looked at this and we were Paul
Speaker 1: and the open corruption. We're paulled at seeing people purpose
Speaker 1: get away with it. And to me, when I saw
Speaker 1: this OJ Simpsons State is signing off on fifty eight
Speaker 1: million dollars for Ron Goldman's father decades after he won
Speaker 1: in the lawsuit, and so they kept this going and going.
Speaker 1: They had the money, but they wouldn't pay it. Now
Speaker 1: he has died and the executor of the Simpson estate
Speaker 1: has finally accepted the claim for fifty eight million dollars.
Speaker 1: They negotiated down from I think one hundred and seventy million,
Speaker 1: and so they're prioritizing paying the irs and other debts
Speaker 1: before they pay off the lawsuit. But what we saw
Speaker 1: with the OJ Simpson thing, and of course it was
Speaker 1: mercilessly and continually lampooned by Norman McDonald on Saturday Night Life,
Speaker 1: so much so that it probably got pushed out of
Speaker 1: that Saturday Night Live for doing it. The people running it.
Speaker 1: We're not happy about what he was saying at all
Speaker 1: about the O. J. Simpson situation, but it hungover society
Speaker 1: getting away with murder in the same way that Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein getting away with what he did to young girls,
Speaker 1: and with Donald Trump getting away with being his co
Speaker 1: I guess his wingman or whatever, right, And so when
Speaker 1: you look at this, I think that helps to explain
Speaker 1: why this, of all issues, I mean, when I go
Speaker 1: back and I look at twenty twenty and what Trump
Speaker 1: did in twenty twenty, both at the beginning of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty with the lockdowns and the vaccines and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff, and paying hospitals to murder people,
Speaker 1: and then finishing up with this massive Stop the Steel grift.
Speaker 1: Actually that wasn't his grift. His was save America. Stop
Speaker 1: the Steal was Alex Jones's special grift, where that both
Speaker 1: of them made millions of dollars at the expense of
Speaker 1: their gullible followers. And so when I look at this
Speaker 1: and the fact that this is coming back, I think
Speaker 1: there's a lot of parallels to it. I think that
Speaker 1: when you look at the oj Simpson thing, it helps
Speaker 1: to explain people's outrage at this corruption, this corrupt society.
Speaker 1: And there's an article that is on The Guardian talking
Speaker 1: about the banality of evil, and one of the things
Speaker 1: that has come out of these twenty thousand emails that
Speaker 1: were part of the Epstein estate, it's just how many
Speaker 1: people he was connected with that were very, very powerful people,
Speaker 1: of course, and how it was kind of not even
Speaker 1: an issue for them what he had done, what he
Speaker 1: had been convicted of and basically got away with doing.
Speaker 1: And so they would look at this and it's like,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't care what the guy does. You know,
Speaker 1: I need his political expertise. And he had political expertise
Speaker 1: for sure, as they point out this article the Banality
Speaker 1: of Evil. He got by with a little help from
Speaker 1: his friends. He sure did. From British royalty to White
Speaker 1: House alumni, from a Silicon Valley investor to a left
Speaker 1: wing academic. Connections and influence or the ultimate currency for
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein, And interestingly enough, Democrats figure more in his
Speaker 1: sphere of influence than Republicans do, with the exception of Trump, who,
Speaker 1: as I always say, is not a Republican. He's a
Speaker 1: New York City Democrat, friend of the Clinton's, friend of Epstein's,
Speaker 1: and that's why Trump is in here. Yeah, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of articles, i say, from conservatives saying, well, the
Speaker 1: Democrats released this stuff to get Trump. Did they look
Speaker 1: at any of it? Do they realize how badly they
Speaker 1: come out and all this stuff? Well, of course there's
Speaker 1: a lot of highly connected academics and Democrat politicians that
Speaker 1: are involved in this Epstein thing, and I would include
Speaker 1: in that Donald Trump. I've always believed that he's a Democrat.
Speaker 1: So none of them appeared to challenge Epstein over his
Speaker 1: horrific times, didn't really care. And again this article from
Speaker 1: The Guardian, the dog that didn't bark. Here is the
Speaker 1: masade and the intelligence agencies, and they completely skip over
Speaker 1: that stuff. Well, you know, Trump turned him in because
Speaker 1: of his real estate fight, not because he had a
Speaker 1: problem with what he was doing. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: you know, we talk about this from the British perspective,
Speaker 1: and they mentioned the man formerly known as Prince who's
Speaker 1: now known as Andrew. So when you look at this,
Speaker 1: you can't forget what Michael Wolfe pointed out that Epstein
Speaker 1: and Trump formed themselves into what they called a committee
Speaker 1: to go find young girls for Andrew when he was prince,
Speaker 1: and that tells you a lot. So, spanning twosand and
Speaker 1: nine to twenty nineteen, Epstein's short, choppy emails leyden was
Speaker 1: spelling and grammatical errors do little to implicate his contacts,
Speaker 1: including Trump, and any criminal activities, but they show the
Speaker 1: acquaintances supporting him during legal troubles while others sought introductions
Speaker 1: or ask for advice on everything from dating to oil prices.
Speaker 1: This bantering, frivolous tone implies that Epstein would have felt
Speaker 1: still welcome as a member of polite society. No, i'd
Speaker 1: say not polite society, of elite society, receiving no social
Speaker 1: incentive to change his ways. Far from being ostracized as
Speaker 1: a sex offender, he was normalized. And we all know that.
Speaker 1: That's why we lick with disgust and disdain at the
Speaker 1: elite society because in the elite society, the clubs that
Speaker 1: you and I are not a part of, thankfully, it
Speaker 1: is this kind of behavior that is normal. And there
Speaker 1: is no ostracism for mass murder, whether it's by war
Speaker 1: or by vaccine, there's no ostracism. There's celebration. Hey, you
Speaker 1: got away with it, and look at you're now. You
Speaker 1: made billions off this thing. Good job. Can you give
Speaker 1: me advice on how to do that? As well?
Speaker 2: It reminds me of the myth of ancient Greece being
Speaker 2: homosexual because there was a problem of the elites being
Speaker 2: homosexuals and pedophiles. Yeah, and that has been twisted historically,
Speaker 2: but the people were not happy with that. Homosexuality, not
Speaker 2: just metophilia, but just homosexuality was illegal in ancient Greece
Speaker 2: and had pretty horrific punishments for people that were found
Speaker 2: guilty of homosexuality.
Speaker 1: But of course the elites flaunt the royals and the
Speaker 1: laws because they don't apply to them. What did they
Speaker 1: do at the school board meetings and Athens? Of course
Speaker 1: they didn't have schools like that. That was what they
Speaker 1: had was, you know, the academy that Aristotle had and everything.
Speaker 1: It was a peripatetic form of instruction. He would walk
Speaker 1: along with his students and they would talk as they walked.
Speaker 1: Same thing that Jesus would do, and same thing that
Speaker 1: we're told to do with our children Deuteronomy six. When
Speaker 1: you walk with them in the way, so when you
Speaker 1: walk through life with him, you teach them anyway. Going
Speaker 1: back to this, so this ten year period, there's no ostracism.
Speaker 1: In several messages in twenty eighteen, he advised longtime Trump
Speaker 1: ally Steve Bennon, who is all over them the place
Speaker 1: in these emails, another bantal, evil guy. He doesn't have
Speaker 1: an interesting insights, folks, but he is evil. He got
Speaker 1: to give him that. It is Steve Bennon is right
Speaker 1: there on the cusp of being evil, and he's another
Speaker 1: one of these guys who there's no concern about what
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein did or was or was continued to be
Speaker 1: while Bannon was. As a matter of fact, Bannon comes
Speaker 1: in and it's like, can you help me with some
Speaker 1: introductions over such and such a place? Can I help
Speaker 1: you with pr Can I restore your public image because
Speaker 1: the public is not happy with you. I know, the
Speaker 1: leaps don't care. You know, we all love you because
Speaker 1: you're successful. We don't care what you do. So that's
Speaker 1: one of the things that's come out of this is
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon. It's only people to wake up to this guy.
Speaker 1: It's just amazing to me. So on his political tour
Speaker 1: of Europe, Bannon forwarded Epstein a news clip that described
Speaker 1: the German media as quote underestimating Bannon and saying he
Speaker 1: was quote as dangerous as ever. Well, how about that
Speaker 1: sometimes the media gets it right. I would say, maybe
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon is even more dangerous than ever because people
Speaker 1: are trusting him. Do not trust that guy, Do not
Speaker 1: trust him at all? And Epstein responded and said, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: I love it. Yeah, you're as dangerous as ever, and
Speaker 1: so he said. Epstein followed up in any email to
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon, there are many leaders of countries we can
Speaker 1: organize for you to have one on ones. I agree
Speaker 1: one hundred percent. How do I do that? Said Bannon?
Speaker 1: Do you notice the Wei there? I wonder who the
Speaker 1: WI is? Is it Masad that he's working with, because
Speaker 1: we know that he did work with Massad. He was
Speaker 1: their go to guy for several countries in relationships that
Speaker 1: were there. He had a physicist, Lawrence Krauss, who was
Speaker 1: facing sexual harassment allegations, and so he emailed Epstein for advice. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that would be one area where he would have a
Speaker 1: lot of experience. If you're looking at prison time, you
Speaker 1: may not want to ask him too much advice about
Speaker 1: how to do time because he didn't do time for
Speaker 1: what he did, but he didn't do this sexual harassment stuff.
Speaker 1: To put it.
Speaker 2: Mildly, Sometimes people with sexual harassment allegations the false allegations,
Speaker 2: but if you're asking Epstein for advice on how to
Speaker 2: get away from them, I kind of think these are accurate.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right. Well. Larry Summers, who was a
Speaker 1: Treasury secretary of Bill Clinton, later became president of Harvard University,
Speaker 1: described his interactions with a woman and asked him to
Speaker 1: give him dating advice and to critique how he had
Speaker 1: interacted with this woman, and Epstein thought he was doing
Speaker 1: a great job. Did he slipper or drug or something? First?
Speaker 1: Exactly what interaction? Yeah, this is like asking and to
Speaker 1: Tait for dating advice or advice on the opposite sex
Speaker 1: or something. And another email, Larry summers a pined, I'm
Speaker 1: trying to figure why American elite think if you murder
Speaker 1: your baby by eating or abandonment. No, it's not if
Speaker 1: you murder your baby by abortion, ripping them apart, limb
Speaker 1: by limb. Okay, but if you abandon your if you
Speaker 1: murder your baby by beating or abandonment, it is irrelevant
Speaker 1: to your admission to Harvard. But hit on a few
Speaker 1: women ten years ago, and you can't work at a
Speaker 1: network or to think tank. And then he puts an
Speaker 1: all upper case do not repeat this insight. Well, Larry
Speaker 1: has just been repeated everywhere. The truth will come out
Speaker 1: eventually for these people, even if not in their lifetime,
Speaker 1: it will come out. And so isn't that amazing right.
Speaker 1: You know, you can kill your baby, but don't harass
Speaker 1: a woman because they'll come after you, you know, especially
Speaker 1: if you rip your baby apart, pay a doctor to
Speaker 1: do it, they will applaud you. On the left.
Speaker 2: The real funny thing here is that he's saying that
Speaker 2: there shouldn't be any punishment for the other thing as well.
Speaker 2: Not that is absurd that these people are getting away
Speaker 2: with murdering their baby. It's I want some of that.
Speaker 1: This is the banality of evil exactly, So Summers asked him.
Speaker 1: He said, how is life among the lucrative and the
Speaker 1: Luche said, when we meet, I will endeavor to mesmerize
Speaker 1: you with my stories of DC. It is so wild,
Speaker 1: said Epstein. Well, Summers was not the only Democrat in
Speaker 1: Epstein's orbit. Catherine Rumler, a former White House council I
Speaker 1: don't know if I'm pronouncing her name right or not.
Speaker 1: Under Barack Obama, sent a message to him calling Trump
Speaker 1: so gross, and he said he's worse in real life
Speaker 1: and up close and other emails with her. Epstein detailed
Speaker 1: a world win of well known people that he appears
Speaker 1: to be meeting, hosting, or speaking with that week. So
Speaker 1: here's some of the people I'm going to meet, meeting
Speaker 1: with an ambassador, a tech giant, foreign business people, academics,
Speaker 1: a film director. I wonder if that was Woody Ellen.
Speaker 1: You know Woody Allen when he wrote in the Birthday book,
Speaker 1: he was talking about how he had known Epstein for
Speaker 1: the longest time. Of course Woody Allen, who married his stepdaughter. Anyway,
Speaker 1: he said, you are a welcome guest at any of
Speaker 1: these he wrote to her. And so you know, when
Speaker 1: you look at this and you look at Woody Allen's
Speaker 1: statement talking about how when he and his wife first
Speaker 1: went there, his wife is his stepdaughter. Wife first went
Speaker 1: to the first party that they did with Epstein, he said,
Speaker 1: a little bit awkward, but you've really become polished, and
Speaker 1: conversation is just so amazing and interesting. And I guess
Speaker 1: maybe there were other things as well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's why everyone was going to epstein Island was
Speaker 2: for the conversation.
Speaker 1: That's why they read Playboy for the interviews, right, he says,
Speaker 1: I think I'm going to drive, she said, and I
Speaker 1: will then stop to pee and get gas at a restaurant,
Speaker 1: at a rest stop in the New Jersey turn, and
Speaker 1: I will observe all the people there who are at
Speaker 1: least one hundred pounds overweight, and I'll have a mild
Speaker 1: panic attack as a result of the observation, and will
Speaker 1: then decide that I am not eating another bite of
Speaker 1: food for the rest of my life out of fear
Speaker 1: that I will end up like one of those people. See.
Speaker 1: Being overweight is awful in her eyes, but being a
Speaker 1: pedophile that's fine, especially if you're aeradyite and entertaining in
Speaker 1: your conversation. This is the elitist contempt, not only for morality,
Speaker 1: but for all of us as well. They look at
Speaker 1: us with contempt. It helps you to understand why they
Speaker 1: can kill us for money, right with a vaccine and
Speaker 1: other things. Andrew's official account of his relationship with Epstein
Speaker 1: as accusers, an email from March of twenty eleven shows
Speaker 1: continued contact four months after Andrew later publicly claimed to
Speaker 1: have ended the relationship, and a message to Epstein and
Speaker 1: Glaine My regarding the allegations, the man formerly known as
Speaker 1: Prince now known as Andrew said, I can't take any
Speaker 1: more of this on my end. You know the thing
Speaker 1: about it is and there's no lesson being learned from
Speaker 1: Andrew's experience by Donald Trump, because I said last week,
Speaker 1: you know, the people around him that he's taking us
Speaker 1: down because he is so tone deaf and blind to
Speaker 1: the optics of what he's doing. He continued, just like
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, he insisted that he had done nothing wrong.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, he insisted they didn't know
Speaker 1: Virginia Guthrie, even though there were pictures of them together,
Speaker 1: even though she said it, even though he paid her
Speaker 1: twelve million pounds, He claimed that he had never done
Speaker 1: anything wrong. He just you know, you give somebody twelve
Speaker 1: million pounds because they asked for you, ask you for it, right,
Speaker 1: And so he continued to disrespect the public, thinking that
Speaker 1: he could lie to their face about what is plane
Speaker 1: and obvious, just like Donald Trump. And the question is
Speaker 1: when will the GOP cut the ties to Trump. The
Speaker 1: Royal family saw that he was dragging down their public image.
Speaker 1: They're much better at doing this. They've had a lot
Speaker 1: of practice with scandals and cover ups and that type
Speaker 1: of thing, so they cut him loose. The GOP doesn't
Speaker 1: want to cut loose Trump, except there's some in the
Speaker 1: GOP who are starting that rope that he has tied
Speaker 1: them up with. It's starting to fray a little bit. So.
Speaker 1: Michael Wolf appears in numerous exchanges, often acting as an
Speaker 1: informal advisor to Epstein regarding his relationship with Trump. The
Speaker 1: emails showed that Epstein's role and his network went far
Speaker 1: beyond social pleasantries. He was treated as a trusted consigliere.
Speaker 1: That's a good word, because it's mafia crime families, aren't they?
Speaker 1: A fixer who's judgment on matter of politics, scandal, and
Speaker 1: personal life was actively sought by the powerful. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: other people who'd sold their soul to the devil. In
Speaker 1: January twenty ten, biotech venture capitalist Boris Nicolett was attending
Speaker 1: the World Economic Forum in Davos. Epstein email to ask
Speaker 1: is it any fun? Nikolak replied that he had met quote,
Speaker 1: your friend Bill Clinton, as well as then French president
Speaker 1: Nicholas Sarkozy, who has been convicted. But he only did
Speaker 1: They convicted him of a massive bribery and the overthrow
Speaker 1: of Kadafi for his own personal reasons and sentenced to
Speaker 1: them to jail. They let him out, I think after
Speaker 1: just a couple of weeks or months anyway. And your
Speaker 1: other friend Andrew, he said, and then Nikolak said he
Speaker 1: was getting sick of the meetings at Davos. It would
Speaker 1: be a blast that if you were here, he says.
Speaker 1: He mentioned flirting with a twenty two year old woman
Speaker 1: and said it turns out she's with her husband. Didn't
Speaker 1: have a chance to check him out. But as we concluded,
Speaker 1: anything good is rented. And he puts a wink there,
Speaker 1: and emails with Sultan Suliemon and the Muradi businessman. Epstein
Speaker 1: complimented Bannon, saying in twenty eighteen quote we have become friends.
Speaker 1: You will like him Suliam and said Trump doesn't like him. Well,
Speaker 1: that's all that matters, right, is Trump like you? And
Speaker 1: a twenty fifteen email he was communicating with Noam Chomsky, right,
Speaker 1: another leftist, and offered him the use of his New
Speaker 1: York and New Mexico residences. And here's the one the
Speaker 1: artist Andres Serrano and I'm looking at that as familiar.
Speaker 1: Whoever I seen his name before, and they just described
Speaker 1: him as an artist. I thought, you know, what kind
Speaker 1: of artist is he? You know, is the music, film whatever?
Speaker 1: No art? Art? You know, like drawing or something, except
Speaker 1: he doesn't do any drawing. I went back and refresh
Speaker 1: my memory He is a quote unquote artist. They call
Speaker 1: it his form of art transgressionist art. So he does
Speaker 1: things to offend people. He takes photographs of corpses, of feces,
Speaker 1: and he was the one who did if you remember,
Speaker 1: the reason that his name clicked with me was because
Speaker 1: there was that big dispute at one point in time,
Speaker 1: he put a crucifix in a container of urine and
Speaker 1: he called it piss Christ. Remember that that's his art.
Speaker 1: It makes perfectly good sense that this guy would be
Speaker 1: a close confidant of somebody like j for Epstein a
Speaker 1: crucifix and a container of urine. And the reason it
Speaker 1: became a big issue was because he was given a
Speaker 1: very very large grant by the federal government, by the
Speaker 1: National Endowment for Art. And so conservatives are saying, pull
Speaker 1: the National Endowment for Art down right, We don't need
Speaker 1: to have an institution like this is handing out. Where's
Speaker 1: the authority under the constitution even remotely for anything like that.
Speaker 1: And then look at the way that they're handing out
Speaker 1: the money, who they're handing it out to, and what
Speaker 1: he's doing with it. Transgressive art, boy, that's that's a
Speaker 1: transgressing Christ as a matter of fact. Anyway, Andres Serrano
Speaker 1: discussed the twenty sixteen election with them, and he said
Speaker 1: he was so disgusted at the outrage over Trump's grabbed
Speaker 1: them by the he said, I may vote for him
Speaker 1: just in sympathy. Right, this is what this guy's about.
Speaker 1: How dare anybody get offended at that quote? And so
Speaker 1: Epstein was also in touch with Peter. Heel of course
Speaker 1: sent you an email in twenty fourteen saying that was fun,
Speaker 1: see you in three weeks. No other information they Heel.
Speaker 2: Of course knows a bit more about cybersecurity, and didn't respond.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, so they say, for those inside the circle,
Speaker 1: the rules of the outside world do not apply. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. And we want to look at just how
Speaker 1: evil this all is. Thomas Massey laid it out as
Speaker 1: a matter of fact. It's not just banal, the evil
Speaker 1: of the elites who look at this guy and they
Speaker 1: don't care what he did. They know what he did,
Speaker 1: and they don't care. They just want to get what
Speaker 1: they want to get out of him. Massey looks at
Speaker 1: it from the perspective of how he pulled in these
Speaker 1: young girls. Here.
Speaker 3: People say, well, why isn't it easy to come out
Speaker 3: as a victim. And when I was at this press
Speaker 3: conference with these women, the depth of the evil I
Speaker 3: didn't understand until they spoke it, which was as fourteen
Speaker 3: year old girls, they were told by a friend at
Speaker 3: high school, come over to this old guy's house giving
Speaker 3: him a massage, and he can make two hundred bucks.
Speaker 3: By the way, he's got a nice swimming.
Speaker 4: Pool and all this other stuff.
Speaker 3: All you got to do is giving him a massage.
Speaker 3: The massage turned into something else completely, and he had
Speaker 3: their phone number, and then, through the shame of it,
Speaker 3: he compelled them to show up at his beck and
Speaker 3: call whenever he wanted. And this is where it gets
Speaker 3: really evil. The only way they could get out of
Speaker 3: it of showing up and performing sexual favors for Jeffrey
Speaker 3: Epstein was if they found another girl at their high
Speaker 3: school who would do it in their place.
Speaker 1: And so they.
Speaker 3: Were coerced into one of the witnesses you witnesses survivors,
Speaker 3: broke down in tears because she admitted she just said, listen,
Speaker 3: I was faced with finding a girl for him to
Speaker 3: take my place, or going back there and doing that.
Speaker 3: And I found another girl, and so what happens is now,
Speaker 3: and people are still doing this even after they know
Speaker 3: these are fifteen year old girls who were coerced into
Speaker 3: it by an adult man. They're saying, oh, you were
Speaker 3: a sex trafficker. You know you traffick these women, but
Speaker 3: they don't. I didn't really fully grasp how evil this is.
Speaker 3: Like it's one thing to do evil things to people,
Speaker 3: but to make them do evil things. And then once
Speaker 3: you once he causes you to be implicated, then you
Speaker 3: don't want to come out because then that's what happens
Speaker 3: to you. And now there are people asking, well, why
Speaker 3: don't these women release the names, And the reason is
Speaker 3: these are billionaires like that. So what happened is Epstein
Speaker 3: once girls literally once they got to the age of consent,
Speaker 3: they weren't exciting to him anymore, and he would traffic
Speaker 3: them to his friends. Now, so you might at this
Speaker 3: point they're going to say, oh, well, there were prostitutes,
Speaker 3: they were eighteen, they were age of consent. Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 3: was giving them something and then they did, you know,
Speaker 3: sexual things with these men. And so what happens is
Speaker 3: those men who have billions of dollars, they had money
Speaker 3: to pay off police departments, you know, to lose reports,
Speaker 3: to pay off judges. What they would typically do is
Speaker 3: they would a lot of these girls were from families
Speaker 3: that weren't very affluent. The family would end up with
Speaker 3: one hundred and fifty thousand up to five hundred thousand
Speaker 3: dollars of money and the girl wouldn't testify. So basically
Speaker 3: that's one of the things they would do. But now
Speaker 3: they would just sue them into poverty for defamation. And
Speaker 3: if you don't have the power that the government discover
Speaker 3: these facts, then you can't You can't contest the defamation
Speaker 3: case well enough. And the process is the punishment. They
Speaker 3: basically go broke just trying to hold up their name.
Speaker 1: Isn't that amazing? Think about that? Think about what you
Speaker 1: just heard there. I've got you under my power. I'm
Speaker 1: not going to release you unless you find somebody to
Speaker 1: replace yourself. Haven't we seen this over and over and
Speaker 1: over again, and horror films and demonic Faustian demonic bargains
Speaker 1: and that type of thing with a devil? I mean,
Speaker 1: this is about as satanic as it gets. Right, I'm
Speaker 1: not releasing you. You're under my power unless you bring
Speaker 1: somebody else in that truly is amazing, isn't it. And then,
Speaker 1: of course, you know these are fifteen year olds. Now.
Speaker 1: Megan Kelly just told us last week she didn't think
Speaker 1: that's pedophilia. I don't think that's the same thing. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: they got a lot of allies, and there's a lot
Speaker 1: of people who will tell all kinds of nonsense to you,
Speaker 1: like Megan Kelly in order to curry favor with the
Speaker 1: Maga cult and with Donald Trump. Megan Kelly is a
Speaker 1: little bit late to that party. She's trying to She's
Speaker 1: thrown out her her integrity at the last minute here
Speaker 1: to a dying cult. You know, it wasn't that long
Speaker 1: ago that she was having issues with people who interviewed
Speaker 1: Andrew Tait, and she should have issues with that. I
Speaker 1: have issues with that platforming that guy and making, you know,
Speaker 1: building him up. But she had issues with that, and
Speaker 1: she had issues with conduct of other people she was up.
Speaker 1: But now because Trump is involved on hundred knee degrees away,
Speaker 1: you know, it's interesting to me that Thomas Massey as
Speaker 1: a person of integrity, you may not agree with him
Speaker 1: on every single issue. I happen to think he's got
Speaker 1: most of the issues economics and things like that. He's
Speaker 1: got those right as well, and there's a certain amount
Speaker 1: of integrity that went along with him sticking to what
Speaker 1: he knew was the right thing to do for America.
Speaker 1: That's the first time that Trump attacked him and wanted
Speaker 1: to get him out of office was when he stood
Speaker 1: up and said, no, we can't spend three and a
Speaker 1: half trillion dollars. Now, there's other things that I wish
Speaker 1: he had done in terms of vaccine and things like that.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying I agree one hundred percent with Massey,
Speaker 1: but on the issues that he has spoken out on,
Speaker 1: he's had integrity. You know, maybe he doesn't understand or believe,
Speaker 1: you know, what really happened with the child. I had
Speaker 1: somebody who attacked me for the monster jab thing that
Speaker 1: we put it right. I penned that at the top
Speaker 1: of my Twitter. Thing hasn't got a lot of interaction.
Speaker 1: My Twitter account is basically dead and shadow band for
Speaker 1: so long there, I quit even trying to put anything
Speaker 1: up anyway. But somebody came back and said, well, go
Speaker 1: pat yourself on the back for being right or whatever. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it wasn't about that at all. I wrote that and
Speaker 1: of course, I had to wait for Lance to be
Speaker 1: able to do a fantastic job on the visuals and stuff.
Speaker 1: But I wrote that the early part of this last summer,
Speaker 1: when everything started picking up in terms of the alibi,
Speaker 1: they wanted to tell you that it was the Wu flu,
Speaker 1: that it came from China, that it came out of
Speaker 1: that biosafety level four lab, that it was it was something,
Speaker 1: that it was an accident. Right, nobody is responsible except
Speaker 1: for China. They shouldn't have been doing those experiments, and
Speaker 1: Fauci and Ralph Barrick shouldn't have been funding that stuff
Speaker 1: in defiance of the law in Congress. They continued to
Speaker 1: fund it at UNC and I knew all that stuff,
Speaker 1: and I knew that it was the first biosafety level
Speaker 1: level four lab. In December of twenty nineteen, I reported
Speaker 1: that it was the first one at info Wars report that.
Speaker 1: But then I saw how fake everything was in China,
Speaker 1: and I pulled back from that because then I saw
Speaker 1: the measures that were being proposed, and it was precisely
Speaker 1: what they had practiced from Dark Winter on. And so
Speaker 1: then by the time we got to the summer, I
Speaker 1: had Alex Jones, who was pushing the panic button so
Speaker 1: he could sell food to people, and he brought in
Speaker 1: Francis Boyle, who I'd interviewed many times, because I don't
Speaker 1: think they should be doing these experiments. I don't think
Speaker 1: that they should be trying to make very dangerous substances,
Speaker 1: because they've also got a very bad safety record, as
Speaker 1: we saw in twenty fourteen. Alison Young with USA Today
Speaker 1: did a series of all these different accidents that they
Speaker 1: had at these biosafety level three and four labs, which
Speaker 1: we have hundreds of them in the United States, usually
Speaker 1: attached to a university, and largely because of her reporting,
Speaker 1: Congress said stop it, but of course Francis Collins and
Speaker 1: Anthony Fauci continued to do it in defiance of Congress,
Speaker 1: just like Trump does it. You know, stop me if
Speaker 1: you can, Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 2: The ones we had here, of course, were gain a
Speaker 2: function for bacterial infections like Baderia, pseudamali and ebol and others.
Speaker 1: That's right, which have.
Speaker 2: Known ways to make them much more deadly. They can
Speaker 2: definitely make those deadly. That one in Wuhan was allegedly
Speaker 2: for viruses which they've never been able to do anything with.
Speaker 1: I agree yes, yeah. Again. You know, we don't believe
Speaker 1: they quote unquote science of virology any more than I
Speaker 1: believe the science of climate change, because you can't have
Speaker 1: science if you don't have data. And these people don't
Speaker 1: have data, they haven't done the experiments, they can't reproduce
Speaker 1: their results, and so forth. It's not it's a legend
Speaker 1: that's used for political purposes. It's a mcguffin. So we have,
Speaker 1: in addition to the climate mcguffin, we also have the virus.
Speaker 1: Mcguffin is always there, convenient scare tactic for people. And
Speaker 1: that's why I push back on this stuff. And so
Speaker 1: Alex got me on and wanted to set up a
Speaker 1: kind of debate with Francis Boyle. But you know, look,
Speaker 1: it's just common sense looking at what I was saying
Speaker 1: is just look at what is happening here. You know,
Speaker 1: nobody's dying from this virus. It's phony. So it's not
Speaker 1: a virus, it's not a pandemic. But the JAB is
Speaker 1: going to be really hard. Oh yeah, no, JAB is
Speaker 1: going to be awful. Meanwhile, he's telling people it's just
Speaker 1: sugar water. You can take it for Trump, right, It's
Speaker 1: not the anyway, I've been in this fight for a
Speaker 1: long time, and it wasn't to say that I was
Speaker 1: right from the very beginning. It was to say that
Speaker 1: these people are bringing up this lab link stuff for
Speaker 1: two purposes. One, they want to have an alibi for
Speaker 1: what they did to excuse it. Number Two, they want
Speaker 1: to propagate this lie of rology and of gain a
Speaker 1: function stuff to tell you that we've got another pandemic
Speaker 1: at some point in the future. That's why it's important
Speaker 1: to come out against this. And when they started doing
Speaker 1: all this stuff, and again Rand Paul, and it may
Speaker 1: be his influence on Thomas Massey, it continues to push
Speaker 1: this lab leak stuff. It's disgusting. I mean, I agree
Speaker 1: with Ran Paul on a lot of different issues. On this,
Speaker 1: I think he is one thousand percent long. Just like
Speaker 1: he was wrong about the vaccine doctor Fauci. You're going
Speaker 1: to make people hesitant to take vaccines. It's like, good, Rand,
Speaker 1: why are you concerned about that. I'm really that's probably
Speaker 1: the best thing they could come out of this, maybe
Speaker 1: one of the only good things that could come out
Speaker 1: of this. But he has been on a mission to
Speaker 1: come after Fauci, and to do it by saying it
Speaker 1: was all the lab and it was a lab leak,
Speaker 1: And so I did that monster jab. Not to say
Speaker 1: that I was right from the beginning. I was, by
Speaker 1: the way, But that's beside the point. The point is
Speaker 1: moving forward, moving forward, they're anoculating themselves from punishment, and
Speaker 1: they're laying the foundation for the next one of these
Speaker 1: that they do. And you better wake up. That's what
Speaker 1: I told. The guy said, Well, if you really don't
Speaker 1: understand what happened five years ago, you're not going to
Speaker 1: understand what they're going to do in a couple of years,
Speaker 1: because they're going to do it all again. They got
Speaker 1: away with it. One of the reasons they got away
Speaker 1: with it is because this phony narrative about a lab leak,
Speaker 1: it was never a lab leak. It was always the JAB.
Speaker 1: The monster was the JAB. The monster had been created
Speaker 1: and curated for a very long time by the same
Speaker 1: people who were practicing to lock us down and make
Speaker 1: a condition of our release taking the monster jab. That's
Speaker 1: the bottom line. And so where was I. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is a partisan story from zero Hedge feeding the
Speaker 1: partisan bs about this Epstein backfire intensifies. He was live
Speaker 1: texting with a House Democrat during the twenty nineteen Get
Speaker 1: Trump hearings. So, okay, there we go. We don't really
Speaker 1: care if it's our guy doing this. We only care
Speaker 1: if it's the Democrats doing it. Right, And this is
Speaker 1: the kind of spin that you see increasingly from the
Speaker 1: conservative media like zero Hedge. Look, I don't care about
Speaker 1: the what aboutism. As a matter of fact, if there's
Speaker 1: something you know, when you look at all this what aboutism,
Speaker 1: you know, if somebody uncovers a crime with somebody in
Speaker 1: your camp, right, and so you say, yeah, but what
Speaker 1: about the Democrats? Look at what they did. Now this
Speaker 1: guy is in your camp, right, clean up your house first, right,
Speaker 1: clean up your party first, clean up your guys first,
Speaker 1: and then when you're clean, then you can come after
Speaker 1: the other guys. You know, that's what christ always said,
Speaker 1: you know, take the moat. You know you're worried about
Speaker 1: this little splenter in somebody else's note, You got a
Speaker 1: log in yours. So don't play this what about ism.
Speaker 1: To me, that is the first refuge of a scoundrel.
Speaker 1: In fact, it's like, oh, yeah, well I broke the law, Well,
Speaker 1: so what other people break the law too? No, No,
Speaker 1: that doesn't cut it. Sorry about that, But they point
Speaker 1: out that he was live texting with Delaware Congresswoman Stacey
Speaker 1: Plaskett during twenty nineteen congressional hearing with Michael Cohen, and
Speaker 1: so she was texting him back and forth. They can
Speaker 1: see this now from the records as somebody mentioned Rona
Speaker 1: a graph and as a former Trump executive assistant, and
Speaker 1: she is r H O NA Rona, and so she
Speaker 1: texted him said Rona r O N A quick, I'm
Speaker 1: up next? Is that an acronym? It was a person?
Speaker 1: And so she's asking Epstein for advice. Who is this person?
Speaker 1: What can I do? And it's because Cohen said that
Speaker 1: Rona was the keeper of the secrets. She goes, so
Speaker 1: what is Rona? It's not an acronym? And uh anyway,
Speaker 1: so see there you go. We don't really care what
Speaker 1: Trump did. We don't care that she's keeping secrets for Trump.
Speaker 1: We don't care that he was involved with Epstein. All
Speaker 1: we care about is that you had a House Democrat
Speaker 1: who is asking texting Epstein for information on Trump. Get him,
Speaker 1: get him he's guilty, get him, then go after Epstein.
Speaker 1: It's just amazing to me. Forget this. What about is
Speaker 1: on this the most despicable tactic I have seen, and
Speaker 1: it is why are people still falling for that? They
Speaker 1: use it so often. New Epstein emails tell us more
Speaker 1: of what we already know, says a Free Thought Project,
Speaker 1: And they're right because they focus on not on the
Speaker 1: surface issues of the evil that was being done by
Speaker 1: Epstein to young women and women of any age. They
Speaker 1: don't just focus on that surface evil, but they look
Speaker 1: at who's pulling the strings behind it and guess what.
Speaker 1: As I pointed out last week, it's Masad especially Cia
Speaker 1: likely as well. It serves as a continuation of the
Speaker 1: perpetual political bait and switch of a larger cover up,
Speaker 1: and a free throwt Project understands it. They said, all
Speaker 1: this stuff is like just like this previous zero Hedge
Speaker 1: article I just talked to you about. This is all
Speaker 1: about Oh yeah, well look at the Democrats and look
Speaker 1: at what they were doing. You know, she's texting live
Speaker 1: with Jeffrey Epstein while they're trying to get Trump. Yeah,
Speaker 1: because Trump was joined at the hip. Well let's put
Speaker 1: a different way, joined in some way with Epstein anyway.
Speaker 1: The Democrats being deeply embedded in the Epstein scandal themselves
Speaker 1: clearly have their own motivations for releasing what appears to
Speaker 1: be specifically picked emails to implicate Trump. That goes without
Speaker 1: saying the picture of the emails paint indicates Trump's prior
Speaker 1: knowledge of Epstein's misdeeds. Well, of course, everybody knew that,
Speaker 1: right and what appears to be an acknowledgment of his
Speaker 1: silence on the matter, as in one email, Trump is
Speaker 1: referred to as quote the dog that has not barked,
Speaker 1: But they ignore the fact that he was an intelligence asset.
Speaker 1: You know, we don't want to think about our intelligence
Speaker 1: agencies and how they run honeytraps and they don't do
Speaker 1: all this stuff, and we don't want to think about
Speaker 1: Massad and the fact that you know what they do.
Speaker 1: Don't forget about the two of them were as close
Speaker 1: as two people could be, Epstein and Trump, and for
Speaker 1: many years not to mention Trump's ties to various other
Speaker 1: elements within Epstein's circles, such as his long standing relationship
Speaker 1: with the Clintons themselves heavily implicated, and Trump's involvement with
Speaker 1: the fashion and the model circuit also an integral part
Speaker 1: of Epstein's operation. Via Leslie Wexner again, Les Wexner helped
Speaker 1: to set him up, and less Wexner's the guy who's
Speaker 1: running Victoria's secret and all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 1: Trump is running his beauty contests, and the two of
Speaker 1: them organize beauty contests for very young girls and so forth.
Speaker 1: I've shown you the clips of this. We've all known this.
Speaker 1: One would think that if someone were being accused of
Speaker 1: the most heinous crimes imaginable, and there exists documents to
Speaker 1: exonerate said individual, they would stop it nothing to release
Speaker 1: the information that would clear their name, rather than continuing
Speaker 1: to cover it up and to make baseless assertions that
Speaker 1: the entire thing was a hoax contrived by his political enemies,
Speaker 1: which is what Trump is doing. And this is what
Speaker 1: everybody sees. It's like, okay, so if you're not guilty
Speaker 1: at sin, Donald, you would want that information out to
Speaker 1: exonerate yourself. You're covering this up because of your relationship,
Speaker 1: and you're going even further, You're calling it a hoax,
Speaker 1: and you're dragging down the entire Republican Party with you,
Speaker 1: from Mike Johnson to the rest of them. And what
Speaker 1: a disgusting hypocrisy on the part of Mike Johnson, who
Speaker 1: has worn his Christianity on his sleeve for him to
Speaker 1: be leading this type of thing, especially if the person
Speaker 1: who questioned Trump already had a particularly sordid track record
Speaker 1: with a history of sexual misconduct allegations, and who had
Speaker 1: already been in court once for the alleged sexual assault
Speaker 1: of a teenager, and who is in fact legally adjudicated rapist. Again,
Speaker 1: he wasn't found guilty, just like O. J. Simpson wasn't
Speaker 1: found guilty and criminal court of murder. He wasn't found
Speaker 1: guilty of rape. But in a civil proceeding. That's what
Speaker 1: they mean by legally adjudicated. In a civil proceeding. O. J.
Speaker 1: Simpsons found guilty of murder. Trump is found guilty of rape.
Speaker 1: But he sued CBS over that, remember that, And again
Speaker 1: I think he would have or should have anyway. I
Speaker 1: don't know if there's any justice left in the justice system,
Speaker 1: but he should have lost that suit. Instead, he used,
Speaker 1: corruptly used the FCC to put pressure on CBS as
Speaker 1: Redstone wanted to sell She's Got Cancer, She wanted to
Speaker 1: liquidate and sell to again his buddy Larry Ellison, and
Speaker 1: as a condition of that cell she had to pay off. Trump.
Speaker 1: To me, that is corruption that is worthy of impeachment.
Speaker 1: He's got a personal lawsuit against somebody and he uses
Speaker 1: the FCC to put pressure on them to settle with
Speaker 1: him or they will block the sale. How can people
Speaker 1: not be making that article one of a dozen different
Speaker 1: articles to impeach this sleazy criminal. Well, one can speculate
Speaker 1: whether Trump participated in the abuse of underage victims, which,
Speaker 1: for full transparency's sake, this author firmly believes to be
Speaker 1: the case, As do I. It should be painfully obvious
Speaker 1: for anyone with an iota of common sense that Trump
Speaker 1: has long possessed intimate knowledge of the heinous crimes committed
Speaker 1: by Jeffrey Epstein and Gallainne Maxwell. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: his sickophant Mike Johnson even said, you know, he became
Speaker 1: an informant, basically pointed out that Trump had turned him
Speaker 1: in not because he was disgusted and offended by what
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was doing, but because he was disgusted and
Speaker 1: offended that Jeffrey Epstein would try to buy a piece
Speaker 1: of real estate that he had his eye on. That
Speaker 1: was the reason that he turned him in It is
Speaker 1: precisely the obvious nature of this relationship and the clear
Speaker 1: ulterior motive of the Democrats releasing it that is perhaps
Speaker 1: the most telling. Just like the Epstein files sigh up
Speaker 1: of earlier this year, where redacted binders full of recycled
Speaker 1: and were publicly passed around by white right wing grifters
Speaker 1: and a grand standing show of smoke and mirrors good
Speaker 1: description of that nonsense, This latest stunt by the Democrats
Speaker 1: only serves as more political theater, pulling the public along
Speaker 1: on a string of limited hangout after limited hangout, while
Speaker 1: neither establishment party seriously seeks to reveal the true depths
Speaker 1: of the scandal, and then they all play the whataboutism game,
Speaker 1: and the media plays that along with them. This is
Speaker 1: because the fact of the matter is that the Epstein
Speaker 1: Maxwell sex trafficking network is and has always been, an
Speaker 1: international blackmail operation operated by various intelligence agencies, primarily Masad.
Speaker 1: This is a fact that has been meticulously documented, despite
Speaker 1: Establishment denials to the contrary. The deep state is the
Speaker 1: foundation of all this stuff, right, These intelligence agencies that
Speaker 1: run our government, They are the government. These latest Epstein
Speaker 1: releases are designed to act as bait and switch to
Speaker 1: keep the public playing the charade of left versus right
Speaker 1: paragram paradigm. Just like I point out in that previous article,
Speaker 1: Oh well look, you know you got democrats or texting
Speaker 1: epsteins are trying to get Trump and all this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. That's the end they're playing that. So your
Speaker 1: edge plays it, Megan Kelly plays it, Alex Jones plays it,
Speaker 1: Steve Mannon really plays it up. So yeah, don't get
Speaker 1: distracted by what they're saying that Trump did. We're on
Speaker 1: a bombing run, right, Stay on target, Stay on target.
Speaker 1: It is like Star Wars right, arguing over which side
Speaker 1: has the worst child predators. All the while the system
Speaker 1: empowers these predators and remain who remain wholly unscathed, and
Speaker 1: child victims are used as pawns on a political chessboard.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's what Alex meant by for dy chess right.
Speaker 1: The public should see these charades for what they are,
Speaker 1: and instead of focusing on the manufactured partisan divide, use
Speaker 1: it as an opportunity to call for unity and to
Speaker 1: demand the full release of all evidence pertaining to these
Speaker 1: heinous crimes committed by the rich and powerful. And that
Speaker 1: basically is what Massy is doing. You know, before I
Speaker 1: played the messy clip, here is again what I saw
Speaker 1: about black lives matter. Right, We've got a police problem,
Speaker 1: the way that they engage with people. And again this
Speaker 1: was really accelerated by the Bomba administration, a shoot first
Speaker 1: curriculum being taught in the police academies, and a lot
Speaker 1: of other things that they were doing that we should
Speaker 1: not have government officials doing. And instead what they did
Speaker 1: was they used it to divide people into black and white,
Speaker 1: with the Black Lives Matter stuff and the riots left
Speaker 1: and right, black and white. And so what that does
Speaker 1: is that means that you don't do anything at all
Speaker 1: about the police. They get you fighting each other, and
Speaker 1: the police continue to get worse.
Speaker 3: You know, the President's been saying this is a hoax.
Speaker 3: He's been saying that for months. Well, he's just now
Speaker 3: decided to investigate a hoax if it's a hoax. And
Speaker 3: I have another concern about these investigations that he's announced.
Speaker 3: If they have ongoing investigations in certain areas, those documents
Speaker 3: can't be released. So this might be a big smoke
Speaker 3: screen these investigations to open a bunch right to as
Speaker 3: a last ditch effort to prevent the release of the Epstein.
Speaker 1: Files a phony investigation. Sorry, we can't do. That's part
Speaker 1: of an active investigation. It's got to stay secret. That'll
Speaker 1: be the next thing that they do. Well, you know.
Speaker 1: Katherine Austin fits has an interesting take on the Epstein
Speaker 1: files because ultimately this is not about left and right.
Speaker 1: It's not about Clinton's versus Trump. They're both parties to
Speaker 1: all this stuff. It's about the intelligence agencies. And it's
Speaker 1: also Katherine Austin Fitz reminds us there's an economic excited
Speaker 1: this as well.
Speaker 5: I think the reason that many people who are in
Speaker 5: positions of responsibility the government might not want this disclosed
Speaker 5: is I think it has the possibility at a moment
Speaker 5: when the dollar reserve currency status is in flux and
Speaker 5: people are feeling pretty sensitive about it. I think if
Speaker 5: the truth about Epstein came out, those files would lead
Speaker 5: to a truth about the money that's disappeared out the
Speaker 5: back door in the federal government, and the truth about
Speaker 5: Operation Warp Speed and why the agency missing twenty three
Speaker 5: dollars is running around demanding we inject mysterious ingredients in
Speaker 5: people's body, which this administration continues to promote. I think
Speaker 5: it will help people integrate the dots between the missing
Speaker 5: money and operation warp speed in a way that really
Speaker 5: threatens the financial system. You know, it's one thing to
Speaker 5: me manage the dollars successfully. It's another thing to try
Speaker 5: and management manage it when people know your sort of
Speaker 5: covert tricks. And of course that covert trick threatens Americans'
Speaker 5: retirement savings in a very deep and bad way. We
Speaker 5: don't have a dead problem, we have a robbery problem.
Speaker 5: And I think if too many Americans connect the dots,
Speaker 5: many people feel it would be dangerous for the financial system.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's one of the reasons why. It's some of
Speaker 1: the most obvious stuff that's there, things that they've used
Speaker 1: against other known pedophiles, like the GOP's longest serving Speaker
Speaker 1: of the House, Dennis Haster. They got him based on
Speaker 1: financial information financial crimes because they intentionally keep the statute
Speaker 1: limitations absurdly low. For children, they can't come to terms
Speaker 1: with what happened to them in that amount of time.
Speaker 1: And so, as usual, Katherine Austin fits this spot on
Speaker 1: the solari is her website. It's a great great science
Speaker 1: information and yeah, she gets it's not a debt problem.
Speaker 1: It's a robbery problem. I love that. That really does
Speaker 1: hit it on the nail. Hitting the nail on the
Speaker 1: head doesn't. So yeah. And then Steve Bannon, you know,
Speaker 1: we have to come to terms with what the government
Speaker 1: is doing, and we have to come to term with
Speaker 1: terms with their covert tricks. As she pointed out, we
Speaker 1: need to come to terms with if we're going to
Speaker 1: come to terms with their covert tricks. A big part
Speaker 1: of their covert tricks are the influencers like Bannon, like
Speaker 1: Alex Shows and others. Steve Bannon is all over the
Speaker 1: newly released Jeffrey Epstein emails, raising questions about the fifteen
Speaker 1: hours of Epstein interviews that he has promised to release again.
Speaker 1: You want to look at the banality of evil. I
Speaker 1: think it's the banality of his show, of his evil
Speaker 1: grifting and is being used as an influencer for these
Speaker 1: powers that be. You filmed hours of footage of that
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen. Was designed to get Epstein ready for
Speaker 1: an image changing sit down interview. So Bannon comes in
Speaker 1: and sells himself to this evil person like he sold
Speaker 1: himself to Trump and to so many others, and say,
Speaker 1: I can help you with this. I can help you
Speaker 1: get away. I can drive the getaway car for you.
Speaker 1: I can make you look good, even though everybody knows
Speaker 1: that you're a criminal. I can make you look good.
Speaker 1: I can rehabilitate your image. There He promised to release
Speaker 1: the footage in early twenty twenty six, and the emails
Speaker 1: underscore the need for a full release, which observers from
Speaker 1: across the political spectrum have advocated. So I have the
Speaker 1: database of emails. You see what appears to be a
Speaker 1: very close working relationship between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: And again, one of the things that bothers me about
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon is how he wraps himself in Christian relics
Speaker 1: and imagery and all the rest of this stuff. One
Speaker 1: of the most deceptive evil convicts I have seen in
Speaker 1: the public figure. I never had any personal meetings with
Speaker 1: him anything. I mean, Ian Rogerstone were at Loggerheads all
Speaker 1: the kid, So roger Stone was kind of like a
Speaker 1: repellent for Steve Bannon for longest time. But now Steve
Speaker 1: Bannon and Alex Jones have found common cause because there's
Speaker 1: so much alike with each other. So the emails show
Speaker 1: how close he was many leaders again of countries that
Speaker 1: we can organize for you to get one on ones.
Speaker 1: He told Bannon if he's going to come to Europe, and again,
Speaker 1: who is the we remember this is about the intelligence agencies.
Speaker 1: In August of twenty eighteen, Epstein asked Bannon if he
Speaker 1: wants to come to Europe, and he said, yeah, but
Speaker 1: let's discuss there. There's a crazy jihad against you, said
Speaker 1: Bannon to Epstein. I've never seen anything like it, and
Speaker 1: I've seen a lot. So again, he looks at Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein and he sees a victim. And that amazing. What
Speaker 1: an insight into Steve Bannon. And a follow up email,
Speaker 1: Bannon wrote, somebody big has you in their gun sights. Okay,
Speaker 1: a jihad against Jeffrey Epstein, This poor guy. Why are
Speaker 1: they coming after him? I just don't know. Then in
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, Epstein was apparently scheduled to meet Bannon for
Speaker 1: breakfast on July seventh, but he was arrested for sex
Speaker 1: trafficking charges the day prior, and so one of the
Speaker 1: first things he's going to do when he comes back
Speaker 1: to the States is to meet with Steve Bannon and
Speaker 1: as Michael Wolfe had said before he came back, you know,
Speaker 1: he's in Europe. And Jeffrey Epstein said, I think I
Speaker 1: may have because Michael Wolfe had used a lot of
Speaker 1: his comments about Trump and his biography that attacked Trump,
Speaker 1: and so he said, I may have said too much.
Speaker 1: And Michael Wolfe said, yeah, he did, because as soon
Speaker 1: as his plane touched down in the he was arrested.
Speaker 1: And you know, if he had not been arrested, that
Speaker 1: was very next order of business was to go see
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon, have breakfast with him. So we're going to
Speaker 1: do pr for the peto spy, Jeffrey Epstein. The emails
Speaker 1: shine a new light on reporting on Bannon's attempts to
Speaker 1: rehabilitate Epstein's public image. So Hollywood Reporter described this stuff
Speaker 1: which he's now going to turn into a documentary. You
Speaker 1: understand that was not the purpose. The purpose of recording
Speaker 1: that was to coach him. He was going to play
Speaker 1: the role of Mike Wallace on sixty Minutes or whoever
Speaker 1: it was. I guess Mike Wallass was dead at that
Speaker 1: point in time, but he was going to have a
Speaker 1: sit down interview with sixty Minutes. They don't say who
Speaker 1: it was. I just want to think sixty minutes. I
Speaker 1: think Mike Wallace, but he left a long time ago,
Speaker 1: and Bannon, oh, yeah, here it is. Bannon was going
Speaker 1: to play the part of Mike Walfas I guess Mike
Speaker 1: Wallis was still there. So Bannon promises to release the footage.
Speaker 1: We'll see they recorded six years ago. Why is he waiting?
Speaker 1: Seems to me like if you love the spotlight like
Speaker 1: Mannon does, you would want to put it out there
Speaker 1: right away, you know, strike while the iron is hot.
Speaker 1: Everybody's talking about Jeffrey Epstein. Everybody would want to see
Speaker 1: your stuff there, Steve, what are you hiding it for?
Speaker 1: He's had a lot of people on the right who
Speaker 1: have attacked him, not just on the left. And so
Speaker 1: everybody said when they saw Bannon with Epstein, the two
Speaker 1: of them look like close friends, you know, just like
Speaker 1: with Conald Trump and Epstein. Amazing. Well, Roger Stone has
Speaker 1: attacked Bannon, calling him a perjurer, a BS artist, and
Speaker 1: a backstabber. Pretty accurate. So brave of him to attack, yeah,
Speaker 1: but inciting over seventeen hundred mentions of Steve Bannon in
Speaker 1: Epstein's emails, released today, including many emails between Steve and
Speaker 1: his pedophile friend Jeffrey, said Roger Stone. Rogerstone went on
Speaker 1: to say Bannon took big bucks from Epstein to real
Speaker 1: rehabilitate his image. I mean, doesn't that tell us all
Speaker 1: we need to know about Steve Bannon? Why do people
Speaker 1: still trust him? I just can't understand it anyway.
Speaker 2: Because Epstein knows how to rehabilitate someone's image.
Speaker 1: I guess, yeah, well, Steve Bannon knows how to rehabilitate
Speaker 1: his own image, doesn't he. Dana Lesh criticized what she
Speaker 1: called an eager to showboat Bannon. Yeah, he is for
Speaker 1: allowing Wolf all access to Trump's White House. But again,
Speaker 1: you know she's staying within this carefully constructed Hageli in
Speaker 1: left right paradigm. Alex Jones took a different tact, dismissing
Speaker 1: the presence of Bannon and Epstein's email by citing Bannon's
Speaker 1: plans to interview Epstein. Yes, Steve Bannon doing a TV
Speaker 1: interview with him. That's what he does, right, And what
Speaker 1: you do is you cover for criminals. That's what you do,
Speaker 1: isn't it? Alex? Just amazing? They were pals. There are
Speaker 1: pals just like Trump, wise, and you have covered for
Speaker 1: Trump for ten years now. You've covered up for Trump,
Speaker 1: and so of course you would cover up for somebody
Speaker 1: who's just like him. Steve Bannon pelling around with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: Megan Kelly reviewed a tape of the conversation between Wolf, Bannon, Epstein,
Speaker 1: and former Barack Obama White House counsel Catherine Rumler, recorded
Speaker 1: for one of Wolfe's books, Describing them as friendly and upbeat.
Speaker 1: Megan Kelly said, it sounds like friends having a good time,
Speaker 1: laughing and joking as they try to come up with
Speaker 1: ways to spend a known sex abuser back into the
Speaker 1: good graces of the public. But again, she's not really
Speaker 1: too sure anymore what pedophilia is, Megan Kelly isn't so,
Speaker 1: she said, why was our friend Steve Bannon way maybe
Speaker 1: your friend, not mine? And what does he know of
Speaker 1: the Wolf tapes? More importantly, what about Bannon's own tapes?
Speaker 1: She said, has been reported that he has fifteen hours
Speaker 1: of his own tapes of this guy, but that we've
Speaker 1: never they've never been released. We're pals with him, and
Speaker 1: we would love to ask him directly here in a
Speaker 1: good exchange so he's Bannon is Megan Kelly's friend, and
Speaker 1: Bannon is Jeffrey Epstein's friends. You think about it, You
Speaker 1: know this six degrees of separation of of what is
Speaker 1: his name? See Kevin Megan, Yeah, Hollywood, right, there's only
Speaker 1: like one degree of separation between Jeffrey Epstein and most
Speaker 1: of these people you tune into for news and the
Speaker 1: politicians that you vote for and send your money to
Speaker 1: if you support Trump and his tribe. So again, we're
Speaker 1: pals with him, and we'd like to know more about this,
Speaker 1: says the show voting Megan Kelly. Well, Saturday Night Live
Speaker 1: had not one, but had three different references skits that
Speaker 1: touched on Jeffrey Epstein's emails, and one of them in
Speaker 1: a news report. They said, as you all know, there
Speaker 1: was no news this week, nothing happened with the president,
Speaker 1: no weird information was revealed, No one had any accusations
Speaker 1: that rhyme with Edo file. Trump did nothing wrong, and
Speaker 1: it said, if anything, his crime was just loving too
Speaker 1: much and possibly loving too young. Eventually, their Trump impersonator
Speaker 1: stepped up and said when he was asked about it,
Speaker 1: they said, you know the dog that didn't bark. He goes, well,
Speaker 1: first of all, I'm not a dog. I'm more like
Speaker 1: a cub, possibly in hotter. Anyway, He then said, when
Speaker 1: they said release all the Epstein files, he said, I've
Speaker 1: decided to do that at a price of eight hundred
Speaker 1: dollars per file, holding up an email with a gilded
Speaker 1: frame that some readers believe referenced both Trump and Bill Clinton.
Speaker 1: So again, they had a lot of fun with it.
Speaker 1: But you know, the amazing thing with all this is
Speaker 1: how there can be you know, everybody wants to pretend
Speaker 1: that there's no connections. As one person said, and one
Speaker 1: of the jokes has said, how many pedophiles do you know? One?
Speaker 1: Maybe two? Well, because they're working in an entertainment business,
Speaker 1: Trump is like the Forest Gump of meeting famous pedophiles. Again,
Speaker 1: it's this level of separation, and that's what I've said
Speaker 1: many times about people. How many people do you know
Speaker 1: that are in the CIA? How many people do you
Speaker 1: know that have family members who have been part of
Speaker 1: the CIA. And what does it tell you when you
Speaker 1: see influencers like Alex Schoons and Tucker Carlson who aspire
Speaker 1: to be CIA, who have family members in the CIA,
Speaker 1: who have all kinds of contacts in the CIA that
Speaker 1: come on regularly, people like Steve A. Chennik and many others,
Speaker 1: many of them in military intelligence. What does that tell
Speaker 1: you about that? Maybe you should think about that. Well, uh,
Speaker 1: this is all these guys. They just don't see the connections,
Speaker 1: do they.
Speaker 6: Seriously, we need to release the f Stein list.
Speaker 3: You say that the FBI has Epstein's list, they're sitting
Speaker 3: on it. Why is the FBI protecting the largest scale
Speaker 3: peederist in human history?
Speaker 1: Simple because of who's on that list.
Speaker 3: You don't think that Bill Gates is lobbying cash hotel.
Speaker 7: We're night and day to prevent the disclosure of that list.
Speaker 1: Some governments around the world, Dan Bongino, they.
Speaker 8: Have some material that's related to the Epstein thing.
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton was knee deep in this man. Yeah, he
Speaker 1: was knee deep. Yeah, you gotta release it. Now. What
Speaker 1: what changed?
Speaker 4: They literally campaigned on this.
Speaker 1: It was part of the platform of MAGA. That's right,
Speaker 1: that's right. Yeah, Well it was all partisan politics as
Speaker 1: all it was. They don't care about getting pedophiles and
Speaker 1: they're not going to release them because of who's on
Speaker 1: the list. You heard that very beginning, Well, who's on
Speaker 1: the list. Trump is on the list as well.
Speaker 9: You've seen most of the files.
Speaker 7: Who if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women too?
Speaker 7: Besides himself himself. There is no credible information cash none.
Speaker 7: If there were, I would bring the case yesterday traffic
Speaker 7: to other individuals. And the information we have again is limited.
Speaker 1: So the answer is no one scumbag. We have the
Speaker 1: cash bag.
Speaker 7: In the case file.
Speaker 9: And why is the Epstein files? You have been very
Speaker 9: clear that there's going to be video evidence that proves
Speaker 9: that Epstein killed himself. And I've known you long enough.
Speaker 9: If you say it, I believe you, and I know
Speaker 9: it will be forthcoming. What explain the priority since you have.
Speaker 1: Gotten that's why they're there. If you say it, I'll
Speaker 1: believe it.
Speaker 9: His position and Pam has gotten in her position, and
Speaker 9: maybe why this didn't go as quickly as some people
Speaker 9: and to paid.
Speaker 1: Go as quickly.
Speaker 8: I lost you a little bit, but I assume you
Speaker 8: can hear me, So I'm just going to answer your question.
Speaker 10: Hear you?
Speaker 1: Yeah, there has been Let me get to this first.
Speaker 8: I had a graduation ceremony this morning down in Quantico
Speaker 8: with some with some with the class of new agents
Speaker 8: and I looked every one of them in the eyes,
Speaker 8: shook their hands. I said, listen, you're going to do
Speaker 8: this for us. You're going to protect the homeland.
Speaker 1: And first refuge of a scoundrels, Patriotismally, I was just
Speaker 1: down in Quantico and I'm talking to the FBI, and
Speaker 1: we're the first line of defense for our country. And
Speaker 1: I told him that I'm not going to answer your
Speaker 1: questions about why we're lying and covering up the pedophile
Speaker 1: and this elite network of pedophiles. It's not just Trump,
Speaker 1: it's not just Clinton, it's this entire network of elite pedophiles. Well,
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey called out Cash petal to his face.
Speaker 11: I know that there are a lot of people out there, Sawn,
Speaker 11: who are saying things are expensive.
Speaker 1: And we have to remember that's the wrong clip here,
Speaker 1: because okay.
Speaker 2: Which clip are you looking for?
Speaker 1: I'm on a mislabeled uh massy calling out Cash's lives. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know if we've got that or not. Well,
Speaker 1: if we got it, we'll play when we come back
Speaker 1: from it. Here.
Speaker 3: I watched some of your Senate hearing yesterday when Senator
Speaker 3: Kennedy asked.
Speaker 10: You you've seen most of the files.
Speaker 3: Who, if anyone did Epstein traffic these women to besides himself,
Speaker 3: you replied, According to the transcript, there is no credible
Speaker 3: information that he trafficked them to anyone else. He also
Speaker 3: said somewhere in hearing it here today that the problem
Speaker 3: is that the case files are constrained by limited search
Speaker 3: warrants from two thousand and six to two thousand and seven,
Speaker 3: and that the non prosecution agreement hamstrung future investigations. Those
Speaker 3: constraints only apply to the Southern District of Florida. They
Speaker 3: do not apply to Southern District of New York, the
Speaker 3: location of the twenty nineteen sex trafficking indictment, which produced
Speaker 3: many things, including a series of FD three oh two documents, which.
Speaker 1: Is probably why Trump says he's going to do an
Speaker 1: investigation created with the FBI to protect it, to close
Speaker 1: up these documents.
Speaker 3: In FBI possession Your possession detail at least twenty men,
Speaker 3: including mister Jess Staley, CEO of Barclay's Bank, who Jeffrey
Speaker 3: Epstein trafficked victims to victims, including miners such as Virginia.
Speaker 10: Roberts You free, may she rest in peace.
Speaker 3: That list also includes at least nineteen other individuals, one
Speaker 3: Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, one royal prince,
Speaker 3: one high profile individual in the music industry, one very
Speaker 3: prominent banker, one high profile government official, one high profile
Speaker 3: former politician, one owner of a car company in Italy,
Speaker 3: one rock star.
Speaker 10: One magician.
Speaker 3: At least six billionaires, including a billionaire from Canada. We
Speaker 3: know these people exist in the FBI files, the files
Speaker 3: that you control. I don't know exactly who they are,
Speaker 3: but the FBI does. Have you launched any investigations into
Speaker 3: any of these people?
Speaker 10: And have you seen these three two documents, sir?
Speaker 7: I have asked my FBI agents to review the entirety
Speaker 7: of the Epstein files and bring forth any credible information,
Speaker 7: and we're working with Congress that information, produce it to you.
Speaker 7: But any investigations that arise from any credible investigation will
Speaker 7: be brought There have been no new materials brought to
Speaker 7: me launching a new indict So is.
Speaker 3: The loophole here or is it your assertion that these
Speaker 3: victims aren't credible, that the three twos maybe didn't produce
Speaker 3: credible statements that rise to a probable cause.
Speaker 10: It's not my assertion, sir.
Speaker 7: It's the assertion of two different United States Attorney's offices
Speaker 7: from three separate administrations, who investigated those same materials lifetime.
Speaker 3: The three two documents in the FBI's possession. They reviewed
Speaker 3: all that, yes, sir, and so have you reviewed those
Speaker 3: three two documents that were the victims name the people
Speaker 3: who victimize them if I personally know, but the FBI
Speaker 3: has So how can you sit here in front of
Speaker 3: the Senate and say there are no names?
Speaker 10: I said, Oh, I named one today. I said.
Speaker 7: We are not in the We are not in the
Speaker 7: practice of the Department, just FBI of releasing victims' names.
Speaker 7: That is not what we do. They're not victim releasing
Speaker 7: incredible information.
Speaker 1: These girls are trafficked to them.
Speaker 10: Multiple authorities have looked at the.
Speaker 1: Entire Yeah, that's his excuse. It sounds like Fagan from Oliver.
Speaker 1: We're reviewing the situation, can't do anything about it, and
Speaker 1: we'll do some more reviewing, and as Massy pointed out,
Speaker 1: Trump will start investigating the hoax, as he called it,
Speaker 1: probably so that he can put a lid on all
Speaker 1: this stuff nationally. As Massy pointed out, those court orders
Speaker 1: were regional and didn't apply everywhere. So Trump will do
Speaker 1: an investigation of what he says doesn't exist so he
Speaker 1: can tie this stuff down. That's what I think is
Speaker 1: going to happen next. And he just keeps digging the
Speaker 1: hole deeper and deeper for himself. Truly is amazing. Well,
Speaker 1: I've been talking for an hour and ten minutes. I
Speaker 1: need to give you guys a break here for a second,
Speaker 1: and before we go, I want to thank self Patriot,
Speaker 1: thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that,
Speaker 1: he says. Remember too, that Project Veritas recorded that guy
Speaker 1: that works for the Department of Justice, Joseph Schnitt, saying
Speaker 1: the Republicans were in the process of removing their names
Speaker 1: from the Epstein files. That's right, sanitizing them, and that's
Speaker 1: why it's important to get these side things like the
Speaker 1: documents that came out of the Epstein state that are there.
Speaker 1: But thank you very much for the tip. I really
Speaker 1: appreciate it. You know, we're about halfway through the month
Speaker 1: and we're not anywhere close to fifty percent. I haven't
Speaker 1: updated the gas gauge, something that Karen's brother did and
Speaker 1: he passed away. We're trying to get that the keys
Speaker 1: to that. But I just want to thank people who
Speaker 1: have made contributions. Here's some of the people that we
Speaker 1: received checks for in the last week or so. David
Speaker 1: and Anne, Marie N, David and Wiew, Lloyd P. Margaret,
Speaker 1: Mary T. Scott C. Timothy W. James F. Aaron W.
Speaker 1: And a listener from New York. And I just want
Speaker 1: to say thank you to all of you because it's
Speaker 1: the same names that we see over and over again.
Speaker 1: And so if you're listening to the program, if you're able,
Speaker 1: we really would appreciate I know times are getting tougher now,
Speaker 1: but if you're able to support the program, we would
Speaker 1: really appreciate it, and we could use your support. So
Speaker 1: we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we
Speaker 1: come back. I'll go over the other comments that are here.
Speaker 1: Stay with us. We'll be right back. We've got a
Speaker 1: lot to talk about. As a matter of fact, it's
Speaker 1: kind of amazing. You talked to charleson last Friday and
Speaker 1: he's talking about gen Z and the frustration that people
Speaker 1: have with what is going on now. What happened in
Speaker 1: Mexico City. Yeah, there are a lot of gen Zers
Speaker 1: that were there and they were kind of seminole in
Speaker 1: some of the aspects of it, but it was across
Speaker 1: all demographic groups, so that's not the only thing that's happening.
Speaker 1: But there is a general sense, so it's not just
Speaker 1: limited to one particular bracket of ages, but it's a
Speaker 1: general sense that people have that a our institutions are
Speaker 1: corrupt and out of control and non responsive. Isn't that
Speaker 1: true everywhere we see this globally? And also the fact
Speaker 1: that they are working against us, and just like an
Speaker 1: occupied country, just like the people that were in occupied
Speaker 1: countries like Iraq and so forth, when they see that
Speaker 1: they have no control over their lives, they feel that
Speaker 1: they have no future. Things get really dangerous, and we've
Speaker 1: seen that breakout in Mexico over the weekend. So we're
Speaker 1: going to talk about that as well as many other things.
Speaker 1: Come back in just a few moments. We'll be right
Speaker 1: back making sense common again. You're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show.
Speaker 4: Wait a minute, where am I? Sorry, Jefferson, The scoundrels
Speaker 4: who put America on Central Bank Fiat currency used our
Speaker 4: heads on their coins as some sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 1: This is outrageous.
Speaker 4: Washington, I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 7: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 7: monopoly money.
Speaker 6: Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 4: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 4: isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the FED.
Speaker 4: Up the All New David Night Show Commemorative Coin. Now
Speaker 4: patriots can support a show that won't sell out with
Speaker 4: a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 3: They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth
Speaker 3: listening to.
Speaker 6: The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
Speaker 12: Whether you're feeling like the booze where or bluegrass APS
Speaker 12: Radio has you covered, check out a wide variety of
Speaker 12: channels on our app at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 1: Back you know, I was looking at the last Mohican's
Speaker 1: clip there, and I've got a later on the show.
Speaker 1: I hope we can get to it and talk a
Speaker 1: little bit about Ken Burns quote unquote documentary about the
Speaker 1: American Revolution that is supposed to start. I think this
Speaker 1: coming Sunday. I don't think it started yesterday, but I
Speaker 1: think it's coming up. I have no plans of watching it.
Speaker 1: Quite frankly, if you want to know about the American Revolution,
Speaker 1: you'd be better, sir, by watching a fictional account of
Speaker 1: it Last Mohicans, by somebody who was more honest about
Speaker 1: what was going on and got the gist of what
Speaker 1: was happening, rather than a fictional account produced by Ken
Speaker 1: Burns which masquerades as fact. I mean, after he butchered
Speaker 1: the Civil War. He does a great job of making
Speaker 1: it entertaining. But if you're going to look at something again,
Speaker 1: if you're going to look at you're going to look
Speaker 1: at a a documentary or a dramatization about something that
Speaker 1: is real and something that is important. So I don't
Speaker 1: like most of these Christian Bible stories repackaged and reimagined
Speaker 1: by Hollywood. The David thing, even that came out the
Speaker 1: way they are so typical of what they do. You know.
Speaker 1: It starts out with David charging Goliath, and Goliath is
Speaker 1: throwing these big spears at him that are landing like
Speaker 1: mortars all around him, and then one of them hits him,
Speaker 1: and he hasn't even gotten off a slingshot yet He's
Speaker 1: laying there on the ground bleeding, at which point we
Speaker 1: turned it off and said I've had enough. This is disgusting.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine what they're going to do with the
Speaker 1: more nuanced parts of his story, which I just couldn't
Speaker 1: bear watching it, you know, And it's a but again,
Speaker 1: that's kind of what ken Burns is going to be doing.
Speaker 1: Something he's going to be producing, putting it forward as
Speaker 1: if it were documentary fact. Well, as I said before,
Speaker 1: we went and keeps seeing the same names over and
Speaker 1: over again. And thank you so much, Ratisbro. That was
Speaker 1: very generous tip on rumble. Thank you. He says, from
Speaker 1: a generation with no hope or future as we watch
Speaker 1: foreigners on the black mirror, where our culture and nation
Speaker 1: like a skin suit. Yeah, that's right. It's going to
Speaker 1: be the technology thing that's going to make this one
Speaker 1: so much worse than any of the other Fourth turnings
Speaker 1: that we have seen. Pizano Avante seventeen seventy six. Larry
Speaker 1: Summers is a nephew of the late Nobel Laurate and
Speaker 1: economics Paul Samuelson. I didn't know that Paul Samuelson textbooks
Speaker 1: are used to brainwash college students in knesy and economics.
Speaker 1: I knew that, I believe. So Yeah, I'm a music
Speaker 1: major and I meet Karen and I'm having a good time,
Speaker 1: you know, playing in bands and stuff like that. You
Speaker 1: got to get serious about what's going on. And I
Speaker 1: was like, yeah, you know, you're right, So what should
Speaker 1: I do? Maybe I should go into accounting or something,
Speaker 1: you know, And I went into it for one semester,
Speaker 1: and it's like, this would drive me nuts. I commit
Speaker 1: suicide if all I had to do was taxes and
Speaker 1: things like that. And of course, you know, it took
Speaker 1: a lot of economics class. Enough economics classes do know
Speaker 1: that macroeconomics is absolute total bs. I call it looney
Speaker 1: Tunes because it's like, you know, it doesn't matter, you know,
Speaker 1: you don't have to worry about the debt. It's like
Speaker 1: like Wiley coyote. He doesn't have to worry about the
Speaker 1: ground underneath him, you know, because he can run off
Speaker 1: the cliff and he can keep going for quite a while.
Speaker 1: As long as he doesn't look down and see there's
Speaker 1: nothing underneath him, he's fine. And that's the basic operating
Speaker 1: principle of macroeconomics that's told to us by Samuelson and
Speaker 1: John Maynard Kaynes. And unfortunately, we are now like the
Speaker 1: Wiley coyote. We are now in free fall, and there's
Speaker 1: a giant anvil that is above us, that weighs thirty
Speaker 1: eight trillion pounds. That's about to crush us. I think,
Speaker 1: so b Taylor two forty six. If we know all
Speaker 1: this info that Massy's talking about, is nobody being arrested? Yeah,
Speaker 1: well that's the rhetorical question, isn't it because of corruption?
Speaker 1: Because of corruption? And whenever they point out the crime
Speaker 1: of you know, their guy, they'd say, yeah, well what
Speaker 1: about the crime of that other guy? So I said,
Speaker 1: they cancel out. It's not a problem. It's kind of
Speaker 1: like the securitization of mortgages. Right, You take all these
Speaker 1: bad mortgages and if you put them all into one instrument,
Speaker 1: then you got Standard and Poors and Moody's rates it
Speaker 1: as a plus, even though it consists of a bunch
Speaker 1: of f rated garbage that's there. Well, you know, it's
Speaker 1: kind of the same thing with politics. You throw you
Speaker 1: kind of bundle all of these crimes, these politicians and
Speaker 1: you know, the other side crimes, cancel out and pay
Speaker 1: for your crimes. So you covered what about that? Oh okay,
Speaker 1: So now I'm okay. Opossum King says Fauci is still
Speaker 1: a free man. That's right, and Trump was reelected. That's
Speaker 1: the thing that bothers me so much about all this stuff.
Speaker 1: He not only I mean, you know, fat she she's
Speaker 1: a free man, and he's he's got to keep all
Speaker 1: of that loot that he stole as well. Doug a log.
Speaker 1: Virginia was suicided. Now, who's going to suicide themselves before
Speaker 1: their book hits the shelves. Yeah, we'll see real. Jason Parker,
Speaker 1: thank you. Jason, appreciate that. He said, here's some E
Speaker 1: ten for the Miana. Well, thank you very much. I
Speaker 1: appreciate that. And I can't drive with a stick shift again.
Speaker 1: Now I didn't think i'd be able to, so that's
Speaker 1: a real blessing. And I can work the clutch and
Speaker 1: steer with my left with my left my left foot
Speaker 1: and steer with my left hand. I do somewhat walk
Speaker 1: like a robot, however, not quite as bad, hopefully as
Speaker 1: the Russian robot that I showed you last week that
Speaker 1: took a few steps of people. That looks like he's
Speaker 1: been itting the vodka where I guess, as I would
Speaker 1: say in Russia, the vodka aldi MRI I m r R,
Speaker 1: not MRI. Sorry, that's MRI. Is on my mind, but
Speaker 1: not any more. Anyway, does anything that they'll pull a
Speaker 1: false flag before the vote to release the Epstein files,
Speaker 1: I think not necessarily a false flag. I think that
Speaker 1: they'll be the Venezuelan thing is going to be paying
Speaker 1: dividends to Donald Trump. You know, once you go there
Speaker 1: and once you have the first American soldiers die, well,
Speaker 1: then that will make everything that he's doing okay, right,
Speaker 1: and everybody will close ranks behind him Epstein. Epstein Island
Speaker 1: says Trump will probably be revealed in the Epstein files
Speaker 1: at thirty years from now, like the O. J. Simpson
Speaker 1: estate is paying Ron Goldman's father what thirty one years
Speaker 1: after the murder? That's right, you know real. Jason Barker,
Speaker 1: nicest storm, and thank you very much for the tip.
Speaker 1: He says. I think the whole story about Trump and
Speaker 1: Billy Clinton is a way to discredit all the legitimate concerns.
Speaker 1: Throw the baby out with the bathwater. Yeah, that's what
Speaker 1: they do, Jay Altillo. Steve Bennon said, I published the
Speaker 1: entire library my interviews with Jeffrey Epstein immediately, but I
Speaker 1: don't feel like it.
Speaker 2: Maybe they're on Bondie's desk.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, is that some of the stuff that
Speaker 1: he had? Yeah, I wonder what's on those films that
Speaker 1: he had. You know. That's the other thing too, when
Speaker 1: you talk to when you listen to Michael Wolfe, he said, yeah,
Speaker 1: he was interviewing Jeffrey Epstein, and he wanted to show
Speaker 1: me pictures of himself and you know, with all these girls,
Speaker 1: And he wanted to show me pictures of Trump with
Speaker 1: all these girls anything. Do you think that he wanted
Speaker 1: to show since he and Steve Bannon were so chummy,
Speaker 1: do you think Jeffrey Epstein wanted to show pictures like
Speaker 1: that to Steve Bannon. I think Steve Bannon knew everything
Speaker 1: that was going on as well, and he's covering up
Speaker 1: for him. To me, Steve Bannon wanting to do pr
Speaker 1: for Jeffrey Epstein is at least as bad, if not
Speaker 1: worse than trying to cover up these documents to protect
Speaker 1: your past like Trump is doing. Just truly is amazing.
Speaker 1: How can I think I have any credibility left with
Speaker 1: anybody just beyond me? Aldi Moner Retro Radio, Thank you
Speaker 1: very much. I appreciate that so much. We'll get to
Speaker 1: see the Epstein files as soon as authentic Obama birth
Speaker 1: certificate surfaces. Yeah, everything is all a lie. Damn it
Speaker 1: on Rumble as his new program. That is there, so
Speaker 1: check that out. And yeah, that was the thing about
Speaker 1: the Obama birth certificate. You know, it was so interesting,
Speaker 1: the obvious forgery, the fact that it was there in
Speaker 1: layers as a as a photoshop document, truly was amazing.
Speaker 1: Jason Barker also says, remember Dan Bongino breaking down on
Speaker 1: air about getting the JAB. Now he works for the
Speaker 1: Father of the vaccine and he covers for him. He
Speaker 1: is a flip flopper. And I said that at the time.
Speaker 1: I say, you know, if you remember this, Bongino was
Speaker 1: pressured into it. He was very adamant. I mean, he knew,
Speaker 1: he knew that he wasn't gonna take it, and he said,
Speaker 1: if my employer, and again it was it was a
Speaker 1: big radio chain. I can't remember. I'm not really in
Speaker 1: that business anyway, and so you know, the big radio
Speaker 1: network was telling everybody they had to get the JAB
Speaker 1: as a condition of employment. He said, well, if they
Speaker 1: tell me that, I'm just going to go away. And
Speaker 1: he didn't go away, and he quit talking about it,
Speaker 1: but he was still there and then after a while
Speaker 1: he admitted that he got it, and then later on
Speaker 1: as he knew again. First of all, he knew, I
Speaker 1: don't want to take something that is experimental. I don't
Speaker 1: trust this right, But he did it anyway in order
Speaker 1: to have his lucrative job. And then a year or
Speaker 1: so later, as he saw what was happening to people,
Speaker 1: then he got very concerned about his own health. And
Speaker 1: that's what you're talking about. He broke down on Eric,
Speaker 1: very upset about the fact that he took it. And
Speaker 1: I felt sorry for him at the time. I mean
Speaker 1: feel sorry for people who because of duress. I think
Speaker 1: it's a very evil thing to put people into that
Speaker 1: kind of pressure. And yet I still feel sorry for
Speaker 1: him for having given into that pressure. But here's the thing.
Speaker 1: If he's going to give into that pressure, how can
Speaker 1: you trust him to listen to him for news? And
Speaker 1: how can you trust him as a deputy director of
Speaker 1: the FBI. He's going to do exactly the same thing
Speaker 1: he's already defined himself. Perhaps that's why he was picked,
Speaker 1: because we know this is a guy who will do
Speaker 1: what we tell him to do, even if he knows
Speaker 1: it's the wrong thing, even if he knows it's going
Speaker 1: to hurt him, right, he knew that it was going
Speaker 1: to the job is going to hurt him his health,
Speaker 1: and he knows that his credibility is going to be
Speaker 1: damaged when he openly lies to everybody's face and everybody
Speaker 1: knows that he's lying in order to protect Trump. But
Speaker 1: he's going to do it because he's got the Trump job.
Speaker 1: That's it so real. Octo Spook says, in effect, we
Speaker 1: can't release the name of the serial killer in order
Speaker 1: to protect his victims. Nice logic, Yeah, that's right. Well,
Speaker 1: Trump's weekend review has not been too good. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, he had such a bad week that
Speaker 1: in order to cover up, he has decided the best
Speaker 1: thing that he can do is to start a war
Speaker 1: within the GOP and to eat his own previous supporters,
Speaker 1: to eat his own Republicans. So he started out, you
Speaker 1: know this week they had the shutdown ended. Well, that
Speaker 1: was good, but then he brought in a Syrian terrorist,
Speaker 1: the al Qaeda guy that the US government, the Pentagon
Speaker 1: and the CIA, that is the US government. And that
Speaker 1: is consistent whether you're talking about Obama or you're talking
Speaker 1: about Biden, or you're talking about Trump. They had their way,
Speaker 1: and so they got all these presidents to do what
Speaker 1: they wanted in Syria for their geopolitical games, including Trump.
Speaker 1: And so then Trump brings in this guy who is
Speaker 1: mass murdering all these different ethnic groups, including Christians, after
Speaker 1: virtue signaling and pretending that he's going to do something
Speaker 1: about the mass murder of Christians in Nigeria. Don't hold
Speaker 1: your breath. But if you want to help the people there,
Speaker 1: there are some relief organizations. I had an interview with
Speaker 1: a guy who has one one of those organizations that
Speaker 1: he runs a couple of weeks ago. If you go
Speaker 1: back to the interview, I don't remember the guy's name.
Speaker 1: Maybe you remember his name Lance.
Speaker 2: Are you talking about your news dot com?
Speaker 1: I don't, No, No, I'm talking about the guy, the
Speaker 1: Christian guy who goes to Syria frequently. They have a
Speaker 1: good program because they don't They help with the material
Speaker 1: needs of the people that are there, but they also
Speaker 1: proactively try to help them to organize an early alert system,
Speaker 1: which is about all they can do for defense because
Speaker 1: the government won't allow them to defend themselves. They don't
Speaker 1: have a Second Amendment. I mean, they can you know,
Speaker 1: try to get guns illegally to defend themselves, which of
Speaker 1: course you would want to do. If you can do
Speaker 1: that illegally, do it. It's better to face the wrath
Speaker 1: of a gun control government than it is to be
Speaker 1: massacred by these Muslim terrorists. Anyway, he's not going to
Speaker 1: do anything in Nigeria, and he has a terrorist there.
Speaker 1: And not only that, but he brings the terrorists in.
Speaker 1: This guy who's been with al Qaeda, with ISIS, with
Speaker 1: al Nusra, and has now been installed as a leader
Speaker 1: of Syria by the American government. I mean, they may
Speaker 1: even when you look at Iran and the Ayah toolis right,
Speaker 1: that is blowback from the fact that the CIA ran
Speaker 1: a coup against the leftist elected leader most of egg
Speaker 1: back in the nineteen fifties and installed the Shah of
Speaker 1: Iran and then trained him how to repress the population
Speaker 1: ruthlessly with the savak, arresting political enemies, torturing and killing them.
Speaker 1: That was a CIA training him to do that. And
Speaker 1: so then the blowback from that is to have a
Speaker 1: revolution where the iatolas are put in. Well, in this
Speaker 1: particular case, they skip the interim period of building up
Speaker 1: wrath and everything and the CIA just does a coup
Speaker 1: and directly installs somebody like the Iatola there, and then
Speaker 1: Trump brings him into the White House, patting him on
Speaker 1: the back and all the rest of this stuff on
Speaker 1: Veteran's Day just underscore how you don't want to wars
Speaker 1: or when they tell you who the enemy is, and
Speaker 1: a revolution is when you figured it out for yourself.
Speaker 1: And so that's what maybe Let's helped MAGA a little
Speaker 1: bit to see that happening to bring this terrorist. And
Speaker 1: I did see some people on MAGA saying, wait a minute,
Speaker 1: this is a security breach. How could we have this
Speaker 1: terrorist this close to President Trump? It's like, yeah, what's
Speaker 1: the secret service to him?
Speaker 8: This?
Speaker 1: You don't see that it was Trump who invited him
Speaker 1: in anyway, perhaps it's time for MAGA to wake up,
Speaker 1: because over this last week we've had Epstein, we've had
Speaker 1: the H one B betrayal, We've had a terrorist on
Speaker 1: Veterans Day, and then Trump has decided that he's going
Speaker 1: to sue the BBC because he didn't like a news
Speaker 1: report that they did. So it's been an interesting week here.
Speaker 1: And as they point out in Reason, they said Trump
Speaker 1: is not doing too good in terms of grand juries,
Speaker 1: they're increasingly declining to indict the cases that have been
Speaker 1: brought by Trump's Department of Justice. The purpose of a
Speaker 1: grand jury is to shut down over prosecution, and it
Speaker 1: appears that they're doing their job for whatever reason. So
Speaker 1: they point out less indictable than a ham sandwich. And
Speaker 1: of course that has always been the phrase that you
Speaker 1: can with a grand jury, you can indict a ham sandwich,
Speaker 1: except they fail to do that. In the case of
Speaker 1: the guy with a sandwich attack against the ICE agent,
Speaker 1: they tried to hit him with a felony charge and
Speaker 1: they took it to the grand jury, and the jury
Speaker 1: injury refused him, died him for the phony charge. And
Speaker 1: he's not the only one. I guess, you know, maybe
Speaker 1: what they tried to do is to change it into
Speaker 1: a club sandwich. That's right. But in July twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, brother Sidney Reid recorded on her phone
Speaker 1: as DC police transferred two men into the custody of ICE,
Speaker 1: and DOJ claimed that Reid tried to get between the
Speaker 1: officers and the detainees, and officers gave her multiple commands
Speaker 1: to step back. She allegedly did not step back, and
Speaker 1: one ICE officer then pushed her against the wall and
Speaker 1: told her to stop. She resisted. I don't know how
Speaker 1: she resisted. Maybe she just tried to keep from falling,
Speaker 1: and when an FBI agent stepped in, her hand was
Speaker 1: injured from striking and scraping the cement wall, causing lacerations.
Speaker 1: Authorities arrested her for assaulting, resisting, or impeding a federal officer,
Speaker 1: a felony that is punishable by up to eight years
Speaker 1: in prison. Assault on an officer or agent you'll get arrested,
Speaker 1: said Ice, bragging about this on social media. It's not
Speaker 1: rocket science. But when the US Attorney's office presented her case,
Speaker 1: a grand jury declined to indict, not once, not twice,
Speaker 1: but a staggering three times. They take it before a
Speaker 1: different grand juries three different times and failed each time.
Speaker 1: What does that tell us about how Trump is going
Speaker 1: over the top with all of this law enforcement garbage
Speaker 1: that he's doing.
Speaker 2: And everyone says grand jury are a rubber stamp because
Speaker 2: the defense can't present any arguments, evidence, it's just the prosecution.
Speaker 1: You'll only hear one side of the case, which is
Speaker 1: what we're hearing with the extra judicial killings, in Venezuela.
Speaker 1: We're only hearing one side of the case, and it
Speaker 1: is you know, it doesn't pass a sniff test quite frankly. So,
Speaker 1: after failing to secure an indictment within thirty days, which
Speaker 1: is required by law, the prosecutors instead charged her with
Speaker 1: a misdemeanor. Failing to secure a federal indictment even once
Speaker 1: is extremely rare. In twenty sixteen, for example, look at
Speaker 1: the numbers here. The DOJ prosecuted one hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: thousand cases. I think we have a very activist government,
Speaker 1: don't you. Grand jury failed to return an indictment in
Speaker 1: only six out of the one hundred and thirty thousand cases.
Speaker 1: That is a success rate at the grand jury of
Speaker 1: ninety nine point nine to nine six percent. I guess
Speaker 1: they really can in diet at himazonwich, right, And then
Speaker 1: you have another case where they failed. Sean Dunn was
Speaker 1: the one who threw the sandwich at the federal officer.
Speaker 1: They chased him down, they booked him, and then they
Speaker 1: released him, and then they came after him charged with
Speaker 1: some other crimes. And he offered to surrender voluntarily for
Speaker 1: his arraignment, but instead listen to this federal authorities sent
Speaker 1: twenty officers in riot gear to his apartment to rearrest him.
Speaker 1: They did a photo op and a purp walk. Twenty
Speaker 1: militarized police to arrest this guy for tossing a sandwich
Speaker 1: at one of them, and then they posted the footage
Speaker 1: online on social media as a threat to other people.
Speaker 2: Well, he was a dangerous man. He didn't know what
Speaker 2: other snacks he might have had.
Speaker 1: On him, that's right. Yeah. Attorney General Pam Bondi called him,
Speaker 1: quote an example of the deep state that we had
Speaker 1: been up against and said he had been fired. Well, no,
Speaker 1: actually there's no information, no indication that he was part
Speaker 1: of a pedophile and eligence network. That really is the
Speaker 1: deep state they're up against, you know, the deep state
Speaker 1: that Pambondi is hiding and creating alibis for it. That
Speaker 1: deep state. Now he wasn't a part of that. But
Speaker 1: when presented with the case, a grand jury once again
Speaker 1: declined to indict, and within three weeks of Trump taking
Speaker 1: over d C's police, grand juries in the city have
Speaker 1: declined to return indictments at least seven times. Federal prosecutors
Speaker 1: are failing outside of DC as well, in La acting
Speaker 1: US attorney Bill Silely charged thirty eight people with felonies
Speaker 1: over ledged misconduct at protests and immigration raids in June,
Speaker 1: but the Grand Juries only returned indictments in seven of
Speaker 1: those cases. So he only got indictments in eighteen percent.
Speaker 1: That's down from the usual ninety nine point nine to
Speaker 1: nine six percent of the cases he got eighteen percent.
Speaker 1: Defendant's attorneys claim many of the cases are built on
Speaker 1: provably false allegations from federal officers. It's also possible the
Speaker 1: grand juries are serving their purpose, providing a check against
Speaker 1: prosecutors overcharging on minor offenses. I guess you know, we
Speaker 1: look at this just as we saw with Trump's lockdowns.
Speaker 1: It had a positive silver lining in the sense that
Speaker 1: people were able to see what was happening in their
Speaker 1: child's classroom. And I've said this many times. I've had
Speaker 1: discussions over decades with people about the evil of schools,
Speaker 1: and people say, yeah, I agree with you. I see
Speaker 1: this happening over here and here, but it's not happening
Speaker 1: in my kids classroom. Wait here it is. It's happening
Speaker 1: in your state, right, Oh, it's not happening in my
Speaker 1: kids classroom. Here it is happening in your county, it's
Speaker 1: happening in your school even Yeah, but it's still not
Speaker 1: happening in my kids classroom. And then they got to
Speaker 1: see with zoom what was happening in the kids classroom
Speaker 1: thanks to Donald Trump. So it's possible that there could
Speaker 1: be a silver lining to this Trump garbage as well.
Speaker 1: Perhaps it'll wake up people to the good that juries
Speaker 1: can do. He started out by talking about oj Simpson,
Speaker 1: and you can see that juris can be can go
Speaker 1: the wrong way as well, but it should be there
Speaker 1: as a check against the abuse of power by the government.
Speaker 1: That's its purpose. And so now this last week and
Speaker 1: again over the weekend, Trump is kind of losing and
Speaker 1: he wants NBC to fire Seth Myers. He still hasn't
Speaker 1: learned how all of this stuff. He should go back
Speaker 1: and look up the dri cent effect again. You know,
Speaker 1: he made this guy he was failing in the ratings,
Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel. He made him look like he wrote a
Speaker 1: lot of people, and he temporarily boosted his ratings until
Speaker 1: people tuned in and said, this guy is not funny
Speaker 1: at all. You know, neither is Seth Myers. Frankly, but
Speaker 1: he wants him fired. You know, how dare a comedian
Speaker 1: make fun of America's biggest joke, Donald Trump? His efforts
Speaker 1: to punish people are having just the opposite effect, just
Speaker 1: like his attempts to cover up for Epstein having just
Speaker 1: the opposite effect. He says, Myers has no talent and
Speaker 1: NBC should fire him immediately. He's suffering from a curable
Speaker 1: case of Trump arrangement syndrome. You know this is I've
Speaker 1: heard the Camp followers of their dear leader. Whenever you
Speaker 1: criticize policy and things that Trump is doing, Oh, you
Speaker 1: suffer from Trump arrangement syndrome. Well, you suffer from Trump delusion.
Speaker 1: And so Myers made a lot of jokes about Trump
Speaker 1: and Epstein over the week. Beyond the jokes he made
Speaker 1: about the President, he also poked fund at Democrats like
Speaker 1: Biden and Chuck Schumer as well. But you know, Trump
Speaker 1: is a special case of a thin skinned, spoiled rich
Speaker 1: kid now a billionaire who thinks, because you know, he
Speaker 1: can throw money at people, he thinks everybody should obey
Speaker 1: his every whim And that's bad enough, But what is
Speaker 1: really reprehensible is when he gets the FCC. As I
Speaker 1: said before, to join in with him. That is total
Speaker 1: career option. And of course, after he tweeted on x
Speaker 1: about Myers should be fired, Brendan Carr, the FCC commissioner,
Speaker 1: shared that post about Myers should be fired. And again
Speaker 1: it is Brendan Carr who should be fired, Brendan Carr
Speaker 1: who should be impeached. He shouldn't be weighing in on
Speaker 1: the content of anybody. Again, we don't need the SCC.
Speaker 1: I mean, you can hold the auction once and you
Speaker 1: don't need to have an FCC in order to hold
Speaker 1: an auction of the of the frequency spectrum. And once
Speaker 1: you do that, you don't need the FCC to police
Speaker 1: it to make sure that somebody is transgressing. If I
Speaker 1: bought and I own this property and somebody is trespassing
Speaker 1: on it, which would be some other broadcaster impinging on
Speaker 1: your frequencies that are there, then that's the case of trespass.
Speaker 1: And just like it is with land, if somebody is
Speaker 1: trespassing on your broadcast frequency, you should be able to
Speaker 1: take them to court. That's your that's your property that
Speaker 1: you paid for in an auction from the government. There's
Speaker 1: absolutely no reason to have the FCC. And when you
Speaker 1: have the FCC. Not only are they expensive, but of
Speaker 1: course they're creating more and more regulations and they are
Speaker 1: going to be getting into content, which we've seen all along.
Speaker 1: So Seth Myers on his late night show, here's an example,
Speaker 1: how the guy's not even funny. If you leave him alone,
Speaker 1: he'll go away. But Trump can't do that, So he said.
Speaker 1: President Trump was set to hold a private dinner tonight
Speaker 1: at the White House and the guest list reportedly included
Speaker 1: and goes to JP Morgan as Dac Blackstone, black Rock, Morgan, Stanley, Goldman, Sachs,
Speaker 1: and they says in a related story, Bernie Sanders exploded. Now,
Speaker 1: how is that funny? I mean, that's not even funny.
Speaker 1: If you are a supporter of Bernie Sanders, it's just stupid.
Speaker 1: These guys are political hacks. They're not funny. And yet
Speaker 1: Trump Trump can point that out. But it's when he
Speaker 1: tries to intimidate them, and when he uses the FCC
Speaker 1: that's when it becomes problematical.
Speaker 2: Yeah, why would Bernie Sanders explode? Was he not invited?
Speaker 2: I imagine most of these people are his donors.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 2: A lot from you know, pharmaceutical companies, is one of
Speaker 2: the most heavily bribed individuals in Congress as far as
Speaker 2: that is concerned, and yet people still look to him
Speaker 2: as though he's some sort of outsider.
Speaker 1: Good point lance, Yeah, that is again that's the political
Speaker 1: spin on the unfunny joke from Jimmy Kimmel. He wants
Speaker 1: you to think that Bernie Sanders has opposed to all
Speaker 1: these rich people when he actually a puppet of theirs
Speaker 1: as well, especially the pharmaceutical companies. So Trump is going
Speaker 1: to sue the BBC fro up to five billion dollars
Speaker 1: even after they apologized. And again, people like the Daily
Speaker 1: Skeptic in the UK are no friends of the BBC.
Speaker 1: They report this. Trump says, I think I've got an
Speaker 1: obligation to do it. It was so egregious. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe what you should do is sue them over the
Speaker 1: reporting about Building seven. It was a BBC famously BBC
Speaker 1: reporter famously doing the live report saying that Building seven
Speaker 1: had fallen twenty minutes before it was pulled down. You
Speaker 1: can still see it over his shoulder. They have lied
Speaker 1: to people about COVID and killed people with that. They've
Speaker 1: lied to people about climate change and to help de
Speaker 1: industrialize Britain. And of course they have lied everybody about
Speaker 1: the Great Replacement and all of these wonderful foreigners who
Speaker 1: are being brought in and coddled by the government. So
Speaker 1: they've lied about these really big issues. But if they
Speaker 1: do a news report that Trump doesn't like, then he's
Speaker 1: got an obligation to do something about it, because that
Speaker 1: is egregious. If you say something about Trump, if you
Speaker 1: promulgate the lies of nine eleven and the other shooter
Speaker 1: to drop the COVID thing, if you promulgate the lies
Speaker 1: of climate and Great Replacement to destroy your country, completely
Speaker 1: destroy its industry and destroy it demographically and with crime,
Speaker 1: none of that is egregious. It doesn't rise to the
Speaker 1: level of taking any action. But if you say something
Speaker 1: about Donnie Boy, then he comes after you. And so
Speaker 1: despite their apology, despite the resignations from a couple of people,
Speaker 1: he says, well, we're going to sue them anywhere between
Speaker 1: one billion and five billion dollars, probably sometime next week.
Speaker 1: And I'm assuming he's going to do this in the
Speaker 1: US courts. The BBC Director General and the head of
Speaker 1: BBC News resigned Sunday, evening amid a backlash and what
Speaker 1: has been seen as a corporation's worst crisis since the
Speaker 1: Jimmy Saville scandal more than a decade ago, about other
Speaker 1: pedophile and so now they're being sued by a pedophile. Trump.
Speaker 1: They had a scandal because they covered up for a
Speaker 1: pedophile that was connected with the royal family in King
Speaker 1: Charles and so forth. But now they're being sued by
Speaker 1: pedophile pedophiles.
Speaker 2: The BBC can't whip them more.
Speaker 1: Without him, that's right. Yeah, they're all over the place. Well,
Speaker 1: there are the elite, and that's for sure. BBC Newsnight
Speaker 1: also had doctored footage of his speech in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: making it appear that mister Trump is encouraging his supporters
Speaker 1: to riot. But again, nine to eleven, Building seven, climate hoax,
Speaker 1: COVID hoax, the Great Replacement, the Green takedown, none of
Speaker 1: that is of any concern. It's just everybody's only concerned
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump, especially Donald Trump, is only concerned about
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Trump also hit out at City Cohn, the
Speaker 1: London mayor, longtime political enemy, for letting crime spiral out
Speaker 1: of control in the Capitol. And so they said, my
Speaker 1: mother loved London, but that was a different London than
Speaker 1: you have today. Certainly is well he send in the Marines,
Speaker 1: you know, after they're finished with Washington, d c. Send
Speaker 1: them into London. There's a lot of people who would
Speaker 1: applaud that, actually adding that City Cohn was quote a
Speaker 1: nasty person. You know, he doesn't come after City Khan
Speaker 1: for Sea forty. That city Cohn, mayor of London, and
Speaker 1: Michael Bloomberg when he was mayor of New York put
Speaker 1: together Sea forty forty cities that were going to impose
Speaker 1: arbitrary climate austerity and surfed them on everybody. That's what
Speaker 1: he should be criticized for. But no, he just says
Speaker 1: vague things like, oh, he's a disaster, he's a nasty person.
Speaker 1: And then Trump comes after his own fighting with MTG
Speaker 1: and Marjorie Taylor Green and with Thomas Massey amazingly and
Speaker 1: I love this headline that was up it out by
Speaker 1: one of them said he criticizes Thomas Massey for getting
Speaker 1: married checknotes three times married. Trump snipes at Massy four
Speaker 1: checked my notes getting remarried. It is not amazing that
Speaker 1: he would do something like that. So Thomas Massey just
Speaker 1: got remarried, and you know, he can't find anything in
Speaker 1: terms of policy to come after Massey because Massey is
Speaker 1: right and Trump is wrong in all these policies. But
Speaker 1: it appears that Trump has a Massy derangement syndrome. He
Speaker 1: just flat out mad. Massey isn't just a signatory of
Speaker 1: that petition that passed, but its principal champion, which explains
Speaker 1: the timing of this weekend. Massey secured the petition that
Speaker 1: required two hundred and eighteenth signature on the Epstein File
Speaker 1: Discharge petition parliamentary avenue that overrides Mike Johnson's ability to
Speaker 1: determine which bills are voted upon, and when the vote
Speaker 1: on Massy's bill takes place on Tuesday, a far larger
Speaker 1: number of Republicans are expected to vote for it rather
Speaker 1: than face subsequent attacks when they go before the voters,
Speaker 1: because they kept the Epstein files under wrap. And so
Speaker 1: Massey has been not just the principal champion of transparency
Speaker 1: on this Epstein stuff, but of course he's been consistently
Speaker 1: been against war against foreign aid, which means that that
Speaker 1: puts him at loggerheads with Israel, who always wants foreign
Speaker 1: aid for war and he has also opposed the trillions
Speaker 1: for the COVID scam. Remember that was the first time
Speaker 1: that Trump demanded that Massy be primaried. Out of course,
Speaker 1: that didn't work, and Massey won in twenty twenty with
Speaker 1: like seventy five eighty percent of the vote and Trump lost.
Speaker 1: But again, I played for you earlier Senator Kennedy questioning
Speaker 1: cash Betel on these purpse and Massey calling out cash
Speaker 1: Betel's lies posting on his truth social account. Trump first
Speaker 1: attack first attack targeted Massey. He suggested that Massey remarried
Speaker 1: too quickly after his wife died in June of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four, so it's about a year and a half ago.
Speaker 1: The libertarian minded Kentucky and married a former RAN Paul staffer.
Speaker 1: Last month, Trump implied the marriage was hurting Massey's twenty
Speaker 1: twenty six political prospects. Why would that be claiming that
Speaker 1: Poles give Massy less than an eight percent chance of
Speaker 1: being reelected. Zero Hedge was unable to find a published
Speaker 1: poll that aligns with that characterization. In other words, I'll
Speaker 1: just put it clearly that zero hedge, you won't say
Speaker 1: Trump is lying yet again, there is no poll that
Speaker 1: shows him at eight percent. It's more like eighty percent.
Speaker 1: Massey won his last three prime Mary's Henley, amassing more
Speaker 1: than seventy five percent of the vote and each one.
Speaker 1: So maybe Trump just didn't see that zero and he
Speaker 1: got the numbers reversed. That's eighty percent in favor of Massey,
Speaker 1: not eight percent in support of him. Not long after
Speaker 1: Massey's post, Trump dropped a nearly three hundred word rent
Speaker 1: assailing wacky Marjorie and announcing that he was withdrawing his
Speaker 1: support and his endorsement of Marjorie Taylor Green. He claimed
Speaker 1: that Green's complaints about Trump's policies spring from when Trump
Speaker 1: sent her a poll stating that she should not run
Speaker 1: for governor in the Senate, adding that he's heard Green
Speaker 1: is quote upset that I don't return her phone calls anymore.
Speaker 1: The President said he stands ready to give the quote
Speaker 1: right Republican primary challenger of Green his complete and unyielding support. Well, again,
Speaker 1: that didn't work too well for the opponents of Thomas Massey.
Speaker 1: And you know, it's kind of interesting when we look
Speaker 1: at Trump and look at him criticizing Thomas Massey, who
Speaker 1: by all indications had a very happy marriage that four kids,
Speaker 1: had been married for over thirty years. She died suddenly
Speaker 1: a year and a half ago. And you compare that
Speaker 1: to what Trump did, where he throws his wives out
Speaker 1: and he hectors them after they're gone, and then he
Speaker 1: even took Evana and buried her in his golf course
Speaker 1: so he'd get a tax right off. How does somebody
Speaker 1: like that have the audacity to criticize somebody else. It's
Speaker 1: almost as if you know, you take it, like I've
Speaker 1: said about Trump so many times, and how important it
Speaker 1: is how he treats his wives. You know, when you
Speaker 1: look at this, if he doesn't obey his oath that
Speaker 1: he takes as a wedding vow, why would he obey
Speaker 1: the oath that he takes as president to obey the Constitution?
Speaker 1: And it's almost like you didn't read either the Constitution
Speaker 1: or the marriage vowls. Because the marriage vows say till
Speaker 1: death do us part, not until I'm sick and tired
Speaker 1: of you and I've found a younger model. That's Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's position and all of this. But Thomas Massey had
Speaker 1: something to say about Trump's bullying.
Speaker 11: The President's gone after you in some deeply personal ways.
Speaker 11: I mean, attacking you over and over again, even attacking
Speaker 11: you for regarding your wedding, your recent wedding, which, by
Speaker 11: the way, congratulations.
Speaker 1: What do you make of all that?
Speaker 11: And he's obviously supporting your primary opponents. I mean, what
Speaker 11: kind of retribution are you facing.
Speaker 3: You know, my wife's told me, she said, I told
Speaker 3: you so we should have invited Donald Trump. He's mad
Speaker 3: that he didn't get an invitation. So you know, we're
Speaker 3: taking it with the grain of salt. He's being a
Speaker 3: bully or trying to be a bully, and they're trying
Speaker 3: to beat me here in Kentucky. But here's what's interesting.
Speaker 3: The people financing this campaign consists completely of three billionaires,
Speaker 3: and they're all in the Epstein class. In fact, one
Speaker 3: of them is named in Epstein's phone book. Not the
Speaker 3: secret files at the FBI is keeping, but in Epstein's
Speaker 3: phone book. So it's a small world. Dogs don't bark
Speaker 3: at parked cars. And we are winning. I'm not tired
Speaker 3: of winning yet, but we're winning. And not only the speaker,
Speaker 3: but the Attorney General, the FBI director, and the President
Speaker 3: himself and the vice president. They're taking a big loss
Speaker 3: this week because after months of fighting, I am winning
Speaker 3: this week with Rocanna. We're forcing this vote and it's
Speaker 3: going to happen. I would reminder of Republican colleagues who
Speaker 3: are deciding how to vote. Donald Trump can protect you
Speaker 3: in red districts right now by giving you an endorsement,
Speaker 3: but in twenty thirty he's not going to be the president,
Speaker 3: and you will have voted to protect pedophiles. If you
Speaker 3: don't vote to release these files and the president can't
Speaker 3: protect you, then this vote, the record of this vote
Speaker 3: will last longer than Donald Trump's presidency.
Speaker 1: That's right, absolutely. And you know when we look at
Speaker 1: three billionaires Epstein, billionaires that have put together a fund
Speaker 1: to kick him out, and of course He's billionaires were
Speaker 1: people who were big supporters of Israel as well. Is
Speaker 1: there a Maside connection here anyway? With Marjorie Tayler Green,
Speaker 1: she quickly fired back with a lengthy post of her own.
Speaker 1: She said, President Trump just attacked me and lied about me.
Speaker 1: I haven't called him at all. She said earlier on
Speaker 1: Friday that she had sent Trump a text message urging
Speaker 1: him to quote lean into the release of the Epstein files,
Speaker 1: telling him that Bill Clinton appeared on Epstein's flight logs
Speaker 1: like twenty six times, and that Epstein was the spider
Speaker 1: that wove the web of the deep state. She included
Speaker 1: screenshots of her text messages and she said, well, of
Speaker 1: course he's coming after me. It's hard to make an
Speaker 1: example to scare all the other Republicans before next week's
Speaker 1: vote to release the Epstein files. It's astonishing, really how
Speaker 1: hard he is fighting to stop the Epstein files from
Speaker 1: coming out. And again he made it all about himself.
Speaker 1: It could have been about Bill clint but now there
Speaker 1: is talk that the White House is going to try
Speaker 1: to make it about the Clintons. That's one of their
Speaker 1: fallback positions. Of course, the other fallback position is to say, well,
Speaker 1: we're going to investigate it so they can seal up
Speaker 1: the records. But she said, it's amazing that he actually
Speaker 1: goes to this level. It really is stupid, stupid from
Speaker 1: PRS team. Maybe she'd talk to Steve Bennon. He might
Speaker 1: be able to explain to you how this is a
Speaker 1: stupid move. Americans wish he would fight this hard to
Speaker 1: help the forgotten men and women of America who are
Speaker 1: fed up with foreign wars and fed up with foreign
Speaker 1: causes and are going broke trying to feed their families,
Speaker 1: and we're losing hope of ever achieving the American dream.
Speaker 1: That's what I voted for. She said. And by the way,
Speaker 1: you want to talk about Trump lies, let's talk about
Speaker 1: the fact that he says, a tariffs don't raise prices. Lie.
Speaker 1: Second one, food prices are not going up, said Trump.
Speaker 1: That's a lie also. And why do we say that
Speaker 1: he just exposed his own lies. Well, because he said
Speaker 1: he's going to relieve tariffs on some foreign food to
Speaker 1: get grocery prices down. A. He just admitted that he
Speaker 1: was lying about grocery prices being up. B. He just
Speaker 1: admitted that tariffs in fact do raise prices. And one
Speaker 1: of the most amazing things is on one of the
Speaker 1: Sunday shows, somebody went after Scott Bessant and listened to
Speaker 1: the absurd statement that Scott Bessant had about beef.
Speaker 2: But what is your take on what you just heard?
Speaker 1: He's expecting ten dollars meat?
Speaker 13: Well, well, Maria, the beef market is a very specialized market.
Speaker 13: It goes in long cycles, and that this is the
Speaker 13: perfect storm again, something we inherited. And there's also because
Speaker 13: of the mass immigrants inherited a disease that had been
Speaker 13: we've been rid of in North America made its way
Speaker 13: up through South America. As these migrants, they brought some
Speaker 13: of their cattle with them. So part of the problem
Speaker 13: is we've had to shut the border to Mexican beef
Speaker 13: because of this disease called the screw worm. So we're
Speaker 13: not going to let me get into our supply chain.
Speaker 13: And again, I don't want to focus on one product.
Speaker 13: It's a very important product, and we are.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's stop it right there. Somebody put that up
Speaker 1: with a comment. When your economic policies are completely failing,
Speaker 1: your resort to phony, made up stories. So when these
Speaker 1: Mexicans and other people from Central and South America are
Speaker 1: coming into our country, did you notice they bring their
Speaker 1: cows with them. I hadn't noticed that. Have you noticed
Speaker 1: that we have seen caravans of people, but we have
Speaker 1: never seen a cattle drive coming in with all these
Speaker 1: different This is absolute utter nonsense. It's no pun intended,
Speaker 1: and he's talking about the Mexican screw worm. But actually
Speaker 1: people are concerned about Argentinian beef because they've had a
Speaker 1: problem with heff of mouth disease, and so that was
Speaker 1: something that was brought up by these other people. If
Speaker 1: you import the Argentinian beef, I don't know when they
Speaker 1: import Argentinian beef, if it comes in already processed, I imagine
Speaker 1: it does, or if they're bringing it into the if
Speaker 1: they're bringing it into the slaughterhouses, I don't know how
Speaker 1: that is a threat for hoof of mouth, but that's
Speaker 1: not my area of expertise. Anyway. That's the insanity of this.
Speaker 1: And again you can openly see Scott Bessant telling stupid,
Speaker 1: stupid lies and Trump saying we're going to reduce tariffs
Speaker 1: on some of this beef because we've got to get
Speaker 1: grocery prices down all So then grocery prices are up,
Speaker 1: and they're up because of tariffs. He just had two
Speaker 1: major policy lies that he's been telling exposed. So she said,
Speaker 1: I've supported President Trump for too much of my precious time,
Speaker 1: too much of my own money, and I fought harder
Speaker 1: for him even when almost all of the Republicans turn
Speaker 1: their back and denounced him. But I don't worship or
Speaker 1: serve Trump. I worship God. Jesus is my savior, and
Speaker 1: I serve my district in Georgia and the American people.
Speaker 1: I remain the same today as I've always been, and
Speaker 1: I will continue to pray this administration will be successful
Speaker 1: because the American people desperately deserve what they voted for.
Speaker 1: She's become a very outspoken critic of the foreign policy
Speaker 1: obsessions of Donald Trump, especially with Israel. And it's not
Speaker 1: even an issue. You know, when we look at Trump.
Speaker 1: The thing about Trump is that he openly does the
Speaker 1: things that other people try to cover up, whether it's
Speaker 1: his infidelities, his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Of course he's
Speaker 1: now trying to cover that up. That is very uncharacteristic
Speaker 1: of him. Usually he's proud of the things that he
Speaker 1: does that violates the rule of law and the Constitution.
Speaker 1: And when it comes to Israel, always in the past,
Speaker 1: Israel has bought these politicians, and yet they go to
Speaker 1: great links to try to tell people that that no,
Speaker 1: that's not happening. But he goes out on the other
Speaker 1: hand and he says, well, you know, Israel used to
Speaker 1: own Congress, and rightfully so they should own Congress, but
Speaker 1: they don't anymore. In order for them to get their way,
Speaker 1: you need to have me, in order for you Israel
Speaker 1: to have your way, you need to make sure that
Speaker 1: I get in as present, because I'll give you everything
Speaker 1: that you want. So he is basically prostituting himself to
Speaker 1: Israel in that and doing it openly. Everybody sees it,
Speaker 1: and then he proceeds to do it. That's the thing
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump is that he openly does what other
Speaker 1: people are ashamed of doing. So Massey has taken a
Speaker 1: similar stance, and that's made him a targue get a
Speaker 1: pro Israel forces. Earlier this year, the Trump team launched
Speaker 1: the political action pack focusing on Massy and again three
Speaker 1: billionaires who are part of the Epstein Club Zionist billionaires
Speaker 1: as well, so Robert Barnes. Interestingly enough, Robert Barnes came
Speaker 1: out with a good comment. He said, this is a
Speaker 1: new level of stupidity. Going to war against Massey and
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green while going to bat for Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 1: Trump is quickly torching away support from key parts of
Speaker 1: his base. And you should include there's not only is
Speaker 1: he going to bat for Lindsay Graham, but he's bringing
Speaker 1: in a terrorist. An al Qaeda terrorist is Muslim terrorists
Speaker 1: that so many people died trying to fight brings him
Speaker 1: in on Veterans Day. So yeah, that's that is an
Speaker 1: amazing thing. I'm glad that Robert Barnes. So Robert Barnes
Speaker 1: is saying this, Marjorie Taylor, are any saying this is?
Speaker 1: This is good? We see this from a lot of
Speaker 1: different people. As a matter of fact, Maga is out
Speaker 1: there burning Trump merchandise and putting videos up on social media,
Speaker 1: and it's about time. Funny hat. I hope, I hope
Speaker 1: this is for real, not justly.
Speaker 14: Owned by the Jews, and go against everybody that actually
Speaker 14: is America first and cover for pedophiles. Then you can
Speaker 14: fuck off.
Speaker 1: You're losing people. Quit, You're gonna lose us on the
Speaker 1: video here, we're gonna shut that down.
Speaker 2: What else we got?
Speaker 14: We got some hoodies. We're gonna put those in the
Speaker 14: big fire. Yeah, those are polyester.
Speaker 1: We gotta hurt.
Speaker 14: Ultra Maga shirt. We've got tons of flags. We've got
Speaker 14: way more hats.
Speaker 2: We don't have the flags.
Speaker 1: Well, get some merchandise that you won't have to burn.
Speaker 1: Go to David Night dot news and you can find
Speaker 1: some of our merchandise. Is there you won't have to
Speaker 1: burn it in the future because if you agree with
Speaker 1: us today, we're not going to change here. So another
Speaker 1: person said Donald Trump has lost me. Another one says,
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green has been America first from day one,
Speaker 1: pro Trump, pro border, anti woke. Now Trump turns on her,
Speaker 1: just like he attacked Thomas Massey, not for betraying MAGA,
Speaker 1: but for not being Israel first. He's showing who owns him,
Speaker 1: and it's not the Christian American people. I'm out, said
Speaker 1: this person. Well, you know, Trump always was a New
Speaker 1: York City Democrat. He was always against these policies to
Speaker 1: put America first. He was always part of the elite
Speaker 1: pedro club. These people just now starting to see some
Speaker 1: of this stuff, and hopefully they will continue to see it.
Speaker 1: So you had the war got so bad that you
Speaker 1: actually had Tucker had Marjorie Taylor Green on there. We're
Speaker 1: talking about Trump's obsession with Thomas Massey's got MASSI derangement syndrome.
Speaker 15: So Massey has gotten in a fight, like a personal
Speaker 15: fight with a p and unfortunately I think it has
Speaker 15: gotten personal.
Speaker 6: I should say I don't agree with Massey's more luby.
Speaker 1: And This was before the personal fight with Marjorie Tayler
Speaker 1: Green began this weekend of the.
Speaker 15: Congress that I know, I know a lot of them.
Speaker 15: He's the most principled. He's also a thoroughly decent man
Speaker 15: like actually, and his personal life and I know a
Speaker 15: lot about it is like one of the most impressive
Speaker 15: things I've ever heard. He is self reliant in the
Speaker 15: most American sense. This is a guy who lives off
Speaker 15: grid in the house he built himself, and every one
Speaker 15: of his votes is a voter on principle.
Speaker 6: So I don't know how you couldn't admire a guy
Speaker 6: like that.
Speaker 15: I get that he annoys the president personally, got it,
Speaker 15: But I don't think there are many people in the
Speaker 15: country who live out Donald Trump's own stated principles more
Speaker 15: precisely than Thomas Massey.
Speaker 1: Does compass principles.
Speaker 6: The hell is going on.
Speaker 1: He is a target.
Speaker 15: Graham has an endorsement, and by the way, I just
Speaker 15: want to say clearly, I will do everything I possibly
Speaker 15: can to make sure Lindsay Graham is not re elected.
Speaker 15: Not because I like Lindsea Graham personally, super charming, nice guy,
Speaker 15: but I.
Speaker 1: Bet he is.
Speaker 6: I am continues to get elected. That the whole maga
Speaker 6: thing is.
Speaker 1: Totally they're pretty cute, doctor fake. So what is this? Hm?
Speaker 1: What is this? Yeah? Exactly? Well again that headline thrice
Speaker 1: married Trump snipe set Massy for check notes getting remarried.
Speaker 1: But it's not just that. It's the way that Trump
Speaker 1: came after his wives. But he comes out getting married already.
Speaker 1: Boy was that quick? Again thirty one years of marriage
Speaker 1: when she died. He described her as a love of
Speaker 1: his life. We don't know why she died, but she
Speaker 1: did die suddenly. And again, as he pointed out, it
Speaker 1: was not the vaccine. People do die suddenly for other things.
Speaker 1: And again that's what happened with Karen's brother, Keith, who
Speaker 1: worked with us here. And and I know for a
Speaker 1: fact that Keith did not take the vaccine. He was
Speaker 1: adamantly against it. He listened to the program and he
Speaker 1: believed what I had presented. Anyway, it was a year
Speaker 1: and a half after he got married. So Brian Shallhabi says,
Speaker 1: is the pedophile and chief losing control. Marjorie Telegreens saying again,
Speaker 1: I don't worship or serve Donald Trump. I worship God
Speaker 1: Jesus as my savior. Or are we just finally tiring
Speaker 1: of his childish billionaire ego, because again, that's what it
Speaker 1: really was about, Massy. It wasn't like, Okay, well, I'm
Speaker 1: going to try to convince you that spending three and
Speaker 1: a half trillion dollars on the problem that I created
Speaker 1: with lockdown. I'm going to try to convince you that's
Speaker 1: a good thing to do and you should do it. Well,
Speaker 1: he doesn't agree with me. I really wish it would,
Speaker 1: but you know, hey, he's Republican. And Ronald Reagan said
Speaker 1: the love of the commandment, you don't come after your
Speaker 1: own unless you're Trump, in which case you eat your own.
Speaker 1: But that was really about his ego. It wasn't There
Speaker 1: wasn't going to be any economic discussion about that. He
Speaker 1: wasn't going to try to persuade him. It's just like
Speaker 1: I said do this, and you're going to do it.
Speaker 1: So Brian Shabby said, I'm beginning to hear whispers unconfirmed
Speaker 1: that the pedophile in chief is in danger of losing
Speaker 1: the presidency due to his actions and handling the Epstein files.
Speaker 1: Many of these people that have been listed as Jane
Speaker 1: Doe victims in previous court cases against Epstein and Glene
Speaker 1: Maxwell are now coming forward to tell their stories. Two
Speaker 1: of them, Liz Stein and Jess Michaels, set down an
Speaker 1: interview together with the new Arizona Congresswoman Grahalva, who was
Speaker 1: the one that Mike Johnson was holding up swearing her
Speaker 1: in for an inordinate amount of time because he knew
Speaker 1: that she was going to sign the release petition, which
Speaker 1: was the very first thing she did as soon as
Speaker 1: she was sworn and she walked right over and signed it. So,
Speaker 1: Jess Michael said, we also know that we are no
Speaker 1: longer just representing Epstein's We are representing one out of
Speaker 1: every three women. We are representing survivors who've never had
Speaker 1: a voice. He said. Let that sink in Americans, especially
Speaker 1: those of you who are still standing with Trump and
Speaker 1: claiming that this is all just a hoax by the Democrats.
Speaker 1: One in three women in the US have been sexually abused,
Speaker 1: and from my years of covering this subject, said Rainschawabby,
Speaker 1: I actually think that number is probably even higher than that.
Speaker 1: Trump foolishly tried to pressure two of the Republican women
Speaker 1: who signed the discharged petition into not signing it. One
Speaker 1: of them, Nancy Mayce reportedly wrote the President a long
Speaker 1: explanation of her own personal experience as a survivor of
Speaker 1: sexual abuse and rape and why it was impossible for
Speaker 1: her to change her position on the matter. She wrote
Speaker 1: on xt quote, the Epstein petition is deeply personal. Marjorie
Speaker 1: Taylor Green has previously stated in public November of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four, just after Trump won the national elections, the
Speaker 1: Republicans in Congress have covered up quote sexual harassment and
Speaker 1: assault claims unquote by paying off victims with taxpayer money.
Speaker 1: She said she was also a victim of sexual abuse
Speaker 1: as a congressman, and she had filed a sexual harassment
Speaker 1: and assault claim in the House that went nowhere. Thomas
Speaker 1: Massey has also talked about this. It's a massive amount
Speaker 1: of money that has been paid out at taxpayer expense
Speaker 1: to the victims of congress people in order to cover
Speaker 1: it up. And again go back and look at Dennis
Speaker 1: Hastert and the page scandal that was there in two
Speaker 1: thousand and six. It was Tom Fully and this is
Speaker 1: a guy. Here's the hypocrisy. The Republicans listen to this,
Speaker 1: Tom Folly. I'm sorry not Toime fullick Mark Fully chaired
Speaker 1: the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. He chaired
Speaker 1: the Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. And then it's
Speaker 1: revealed that he is miners pages and Congress the guy
Speaker 1: who chaired the Committee on Missing and Exploited Children, And
Speaker 1: so this whole thing blew up. What was the response
Speaker 1: from the Republicans under Dennis Haster, a known pedophile. Now, well,
Speaker 1: he went on with Rush Limbaugh back in two thousand
Speaker 1: and six and he said, this is just a Democrat hoax.
Speaker 1: This is just part of some politics. There's nothing to this.
Speaker 1: Go back and look at the archives, and the two
Speaker 1: of them were just, yeah, the Democrats are just lying.
Speaker 1: They're just making this stuff up. Same tact that Trump
Speaker 1: is using right now. Didn't work, didn't work, then it's
Speaker 1: not working. Now. Trump's not learned anything at all from
Speaker 1: that hypocrisy, and neither has the squeaker of the mouse,
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson. Truly is amazing that they just keep it
Speaker 1: up with the same stuff. And Thomas Massey has talked
Speaker 1: about this massive slush fun to cover up the sexual
Speaker 1: crimes of people in Congress. So Marjorie Tellergreen made the
Speaker 1: revelation as a growing number of GP. Politicians have expressed
Speaker 1: reservations about Trump's choice to appoint the scandal scarred ex
Speaker 1: lawyer Matt Gates to be his attorney. Journal This is
Speaker 1: this news broke out in November. Back then, Green's request
Speaker 1: would include that the House Ethics Committee releasing the findings
Speaker 1: of its probe into the forty two year old Matt Gates,
Speaker 1: who was accused of paying two women for sex. Green said,
Speaker 1: and here's the thing, she said, back then she was
Speaker 1: doing what about ism going to excuse this kind of
Speaker 1: behavior on Matt Gates's side because they wanted to get
Speaker 1: him in. She said, there's other lawmakers with skeletons in
Speaker 1: their closet, but she stopped short of calling them out
Speaker 1: by name. CNN reported in twenty seventeen that Congress paid
Speaker 1: an eye popping seventeen million dollars the victims of sexual
Speaker 1: harassment and discrimination via the body's Office of Compliance since
Speaker 1: it's creation in the nineteen nineties. Think about that, the
Speaker 1: guy who was chairing the committee investigating Exploitation and Abuse
Speaker 1: of children as somebody who's trying to abuse minor pages
Speaker 1: and then the Office of Compliance are the ones who
Speaker 1: are tasked with covering up the non compliance ethics violations.
Speaker 1: At the very least, do you say, of these people
Speaker 1: in Congress, what total hypocrisy in Congress.
Speaker 2: It's all the type of naming scheme you always see
Speaker 2: from the government. It's the Patriot Act, it's the Ethics Committee,
Speaker 2: it's the Committee for Exploited and Missing Children.
Speaker 1: Yeah, at least they're consistent, right, all the ethics reports
Speaker 1: and claims, including the one I filed, said Marjorie Taylor
Speaker 1: green listing. She wanted all these things to be made public,
Speaker 1: she said, all your sexual harassment and your assault claims
Speaker 1: that were secretly settled by paying off victims a taxpayer money.
Speaker 1: As you said, so said the time, the entire Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein files, the tapes, recordings, witness interviews, and so that
Speaker 1: was a year ago, right after the election, that that
Speaker 1: was going on, because again because of Matt Gates, you know,
Speaker 1: but you would support Matt Gates. She just wants everybody
Speaker 1: else's let's air everybody's dirty laundry, and then we can
Speaker 1: put it out there and then we can just all
Speaker 1: ignore it and go on. Well, I think that the
Speaker 1: only point of putting that out there is if you're
Speaker 1: going to do something about it, and if you know
Speaker 1: that Matt Gates has got issues, you should act on
Speaker 1: It doesn't excuse him the fact that they have been
Speaker 1: covering this up for all these people in Congress, that's
Speaker 1: a separate issue and needs to be addressed. So Friday night,
Speaker 1: Trump publicly attacked MTG, stating that she was wacky, a
Speaker 1: ranting lunatic, and that he was withdrawing his support for
Speaker 1: her reelection all because she wants the Epstein files released,
Speaker 1: and because she has pushed back against his obsession with
Speaker 1: foreign affairs, especially Israel, to the exclusion of what's happening
Speaker 1: in America on Friday, the simmering intension and not going
Speaker 1: to say the juncture of that really does show up
Speaker 1: in tariffs, his obsession with geopolitics and making everyone in
Speaker 1: the world bow the need to him, that's really what
Speaker 1: the terrorists are about. They were not about raising revenue.
Speaker 1: They were not about protecting any particular industry. They were
Speaker 1: about having people kiss the ring globally. To Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: he attacked every single country, even countries like Switzerland where
Speaker 1: we had a trade surplus, and many others he put
Speaker 1: tariffs against them. It wasn't anything economic about it. It
Speaker 1: was all ego in economics. That's why I call it.
Speaker 1: You know, they've had Reaganomics and Clintonomics and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff, Bidenomics. When it comes to Trump,
Speaker 1: it's egonomics. That's certainly what is that. There's not anything
Speaker 1: about economy. It doesn't make any dollars and cents sins
Speaker 1: at all about it. It's all simply about his ego.
Speaker 1: It's egonomics. This guy bankrupted a half dozen casinos. He
Speaker 1: doesn't understand anything about economics or numbers. So again on
Speaker 1: Friday night, he slammed her in a truth social post,
Speaker 1: calling a wacky, a ranting lunatic, while also stating that
Speaker 1: he's looking for somebody to challenge her. So she said,
Speaker 1: President Trump just attacked me and he lied about me.
Speaker 1: I haven't called him at all, but I did send
Speaker 1: these text messages. Apparently this is what sent him over
Speaker 1: the edge the Epstein files, And of course he's coming
Speaker 1: after me hard to make an example to scare all
Speaker 1: the other Republicans before next week so they won't vote
Speaker 1: to release the Epstein file. It's astonishing, really, how hard
Speaker 1: he's fighting to stop the Epstein files from coming out,
Speaker 1: that he actually goes to this level. But really, most
Speaker 1: Americans wish that he would fight this hard to help
Speaker 1: the foreign the forgotten men and women of America who
Speaker 1: are fed up with foreign wars and foreign causes and
Speaker 1: are going broke trying to feed their families, and they're
Speaker 1: losing hope of ever achieving the American dream. That's what
Speaker 1: I voted for. I've supported Trump with too much of
Speaker 1: my precious time, too much of my own money. You
Speaker 1: heard the rest of this so again saying that she
Speaker 1: has not changed, but Trump has. And this is why,
Speaker 1: you know, I octously don't think that Trump has changed.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's changed at all. And you know,
Speaker 1: this is the Trump that I've always seen, that I've
Speaker 1: always talked about. He has not changed. People do change, however,
Speaker 1: which is why you should always evaluate why somebody says.
Speaker 1: Don't just believe it, especially don't believe it if that
Speaker 1: Steve MANNONTLDI about Alex Jones. But you know, don't believe
Speaker 1: it because there's somebody that you follow, like me for example, Right,
Speaker 1: don't believe it just because I say, look it up.
Speaker 1: Do your own research. Don't just become a camp follower
Speaker 1: of anybody. Trump's attacks gave her an understanding, she said,
Speaker 1: of the Epstein victims, she said, as a woman, I
Speaker 1: take threats from men seriously. I now have a small
Speaker 1: understanding of the fear and pressure of the women who
Speaker 1: are victims of Epstein and his cabale must feel. She said,
Speaker 1: as a Republican who's overwhelming, we votes for Trump's bills
Speaker 1: and agenda, his aggression against me, which also fuels the
Speaker 1: venomous nature of his radical internet trolls, many of whom
Speaker 1: are paid. She said, Well, who'll be paying trolls for Trump?
Speaker 1: Will be Trump or somebody who supports Trump. She said,
Speaker 1: this is completely shocking to everyone. Well, you know, we
Speaker 1: stop and think about this. Nancy Mace came out of
Speaker 1: those hearings. I showed you the picture that she was
Speaker 1: in tears when she had talked to the victims of
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. Marjorie Tayler Green made it very clear that
Speaker 1: she wasn't changing, and so it was Lauren Bobert who
Speaker 1: was called into the situation room and had cash Betel
Speaker 1: Nan Bongino, Pambondi and other people that were there to
Speaker 1: put pressure on her, including Trump and she, as I
Speaker 1: pointed out on Friday, She did not yield on that,
Speaker 1: and so I guess they that was why they called
Speaker 1: her end because the other two women they knew they
Speaker 1: could not change their mind. She said, I'm now being
Speaker 1: contact contacted by private security firms with warnings for my
Speaker 1: safety as a hot better threat threats against me are
Speaker 1: being fueled and egged on by the most powerful man
Speaker 1: in the world, the man I supported and helped to
Speaker 1: get elected. Aggressive rhetoric attacking me has historically led to
Speaker 1: death threats and multiple convictions of men who are radicalized
Speaker 1: by the same type of rhetoric being directed at me
Speaker 1: right now, but this time by the President of the
Speaker 1: United States. Yeah, yeah, interesting, isn't it. And so again
Speaker 1: it's also interesting to see how the press reports this WND,
Speaker 1: which I've called to task many times for being uncritically
Speaker 1: Trump cheerleaders. They reported this and it was all from
Speaker 1: Trump's perspective, nothing of what was happening with Marjorie Tailer Green,
Speaker 1: nothing of her response to any of this. Instead, the
Speaker 1: headline is ranting lunatic Trump officially cuts off support of
Speaker 1: Marjorie Tayler Green, and then they proceed to chronicle and
Speaker 1: repeat every allegation of Donald Trump without having anything at
Speaker 1: all from Marjorie Taylor Green. Isn't it amazing? You know, WND,
Speaker 1: just like Breitbart, have become such Trump is you can't
Speaker 1: trust anything they say anymore. It truly is amazing. I
Speaker 1: mean I look at them because for the same reason
Speaker 1: that I read a lot of left leaning stuff, not
Speaker 1: because I believe any of it. It's just because it's like, Wow,
Speaker 1: they really said that, And I was really amazed they
Speaker 1: just reported completely from Trump's side and not a response
Speaker 1: at all from Marjorie Tower Green. Well in on the plane,
Speaker 1: I think it was you had some reporters that were
Speaker 1: asking questions. Yeah, as on Air Force one, they're asking
Speaker 1: Trump questions about his health issues. And of course when
Speaker 1: he went to Walter Reed Hospital, they said, the only
Speaker 1: reason for him to go there is if he's having
Speaker 1: an MRI, said somebody, because they said everything else that
Speaker 1: could be done in hospital, they have it set up
Speaker 1: at the White House. So the only reason for him
Speaker 1: to go would be to get an MRI. And you
Speaker 1: don't do that casually. I mean, I had several of
Speaker 1: these after my stroke, and it is it's an expensive thing,
Speaker 1: but it's also something that is not casually done. Because
Speaker 1: it's a complicated procedure and very expensive and big machines.
Speaker 1: Why they don't have it even at the White House.
Speaker 1: And so one reporter says, was it your brain? And
Speaker 1: Trump says, I have no idea what they analyzed? What brain?
Speaker 1: Was it? Your brain? Was that your heart? Do you
Speaker 1: have a brain? Do you have a heart. So he
Speaker 1: needs to go see the wizard. I guess to get
Speaker 1: a brain to get a heart? I don't know. But anyway,
Speaker 1: who wouldn't know why you were getting an MRI. That's
Speaker 1: the thing I thought was really amazing. Of course, maybe
Speaker 1: he knows and he just doesn't want to tell them,
Speaker 1: And so he's engaging and yet another lie, this one
Speaker 1: relatively harmless, not like the other lives that he's told.
Speaker 1: But see, they said, you know, why'd you get it? Well,
Speaker 1: because it's part of my physical No wrong answer. We
Speaker 1: know that's not true. Getting an MRI is very standard.
Speaker 1: You think I shouldn't have it. Other people got it,
Speaker 1: And the reporter says, well, typically an MRI, and then
Speaker 1: he cuts them off. Right. Typically they're do an MRI
Speaker 1: because they suspect that you've got some problem with your
Speaker 1: heart or your brain or some organ. That they can't
Speaker 1: easily examine. The doctor said it was the best results
Speaker 1: he's ever seen as a doctor. That's it. Trump went
Speaker 1: on to call the results outstanding. My MRI is the
Speaker 1: best MRI ever. And then the reporter pressed and said, well,
Speaker 1: was it your brain or your heart or and then
Speaker 1: he cuts them off again. I have no idea what
Speaker 1: they analyzed, but whatever they analyzed, it analyzed well. They
Speaker 1: said I had as good a results as they have
Speaker 1: ever seen. Now, the other thing I took. I took,
Speaker 1: as you know, and advanced, very advanced test on mental acuity.
Speaker 1: And we've played this, you know, he starts talking about
Speaker 1: the test he did. You know, first you have to
Speaker 1: put that square peg in the round hole or this
Speaker 1: or that. First they start out with like the dinosaurs
Speaker 1: and the lion, and then you do this thing. So
Speaker 1: he just keeps digging the hole deeper, just like does
Speaker 1: with the Epstein thing. So again, the problem with Marjorie
Speaker 1: Taylor Green is that she says she still supports Trump.
Speaker 1: You know, don't support Trump. You can support some of
Speaker 1: his policies, don't support the Trump. Why would you support
Speaker 1: somebody who you just said is out there trying to
Speaker 1: incite violence against you. Seriously, you support him. This is
Speaker 1: not Stockholm syndrome. This is politics, folks. I do support
Speaker 1: him and his administration, and I support them in delivering
Speaker 1: the campaign promises we made to the American people. His remarks,
Speaker 1: of course, have been hurtful. On Friday, Trump went nuclear
Speaker 1: on her and again when he said he's not going
Speaker 1: to endorse her, but he would endorse somebody who runs
Speaker 1: against her. Then Laura Lumer immediately raises her hand on
Speaker 1: social media says I'll run against her. She doesn't even
Speaker 1: live in Georgia. Again, I don't know if it's if
Speaker 1: you can do carpetbager stuff in Georgia, but I know
Speaker 1: they had several high profile people also involved around Trump's
Speaker 1: orbit who moved to Tennessee because there was an open
Speaker 1: seat and they wanted to run for it, and they
Speaker 1: were shut down by the laws of Tennessee, which I
Speaker 1: think are really good laws, saying that you can't run
Speaker 1: for Tennessee office unless you've lived a certain number of
Speaker 1: years in the state. And they extended that because that
Speaker 1: was already in place for state legislators, they extended it
Speaker 1: for congressional representatives, and so that kicked them out. I
Speaker 1: don't know if they'd have the same thing with Laura Lumer,
Speaker 1: but I think she's looney enough, and she has basically
Speaker 1: gone after any other well known women in Republican politics.
Speaker 1: She takes them on, and so I think she's crazy
Speaker 1: enough that I don't think she's going to win anything.
Speaker 1: You talk about somebody that's erratic and looney, you'll see
Speaker 1: her picture right there in the dictionary looney Laura Looney.
Speaker 1: So Trump labels MTG a trader to the Republican Party again,
Speaker 1: because what is the Republican Party other than Trump? And
Speaker 1: if you criticize Trump, that's like criticizing the Constitution or
Speaker 1: disobeying the Constitution, is it? No? Now, Trump thinks that
Speaker 1: Trump is the country, He's the only country that matters,
Speaker 1: and he's always escalating this. But again, has Trump ever
Speaker 1: been a peacemaker with anybody? Once you get on his
Speaker 1: bad side, he just keeps building it there. We see
Speaker 1: him do this over and over again people that he's
Speaker 1: picked to be in his administration. So again she's calling
Speaker 1: him out for abandoning America. First, I don't think he
Speaker 1: ever was. That's where I differ with her on this.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's lost his way. I think he
Speaker 1: has revealed his way. That's the reality of what's happening here.
Speaker 1: And so when you look at things like high prices,
Speaker 1: you know she's called him out on that. So I
Speaker 1: go the grocery store myself. I do my own shopping.
Speaker 1: Grocery prices are very high. And again, as I pointed out,
Speaker 1: Trump has just shown how he knows that he was
Speaker 1: lying about tariffs raising prices and about grocery store prices
Speaker 1: being higher, because now he's going to remove tariffs in
Speaker 1: order to lower grocery prices. And so in terms of
Speaker 1: interventionism Trump, and this is an article from The New American,
Speaker 1: they go down the list in terms of grocery prices
Speaker 1: America first, whether or not she's lost her way. But interventionism,
Speaker 1: I think is one of the key things Trump has
Speaker 1: never retreated from the debacle in Eastern Europe, says The
Speaker 1: New American. He's now leveled sanctions on Russia that came
Speaker 1: after months of failed attempts to mediate peace between Russia
Speaker 1: and Ukraine. He wasn't ever trying to mediate. You're not
Speaker 1: a mediator if you are arming the other side one
Speaker 1: side of the conflict. He could have stopped this immediately,
Speaker 1: and again it's what everybody thought he had in mind.
Speaker 1: He said, I can end this in twenty four hours. Right, Well,
Speaker 1: you just cut off all the weapons to Ukraine, end
Speaker 1: of story. He didn't do that, and because he doesn't
Speaker 1: do that, he doesn't have any credibility as a mediator. Now,
Speaker 1: the Trump White House appears to be planning military intervention
Speaker 1: in Venezuela as well, despite what it says out loud,
Speaker 1: and of course in Ukraine. It's not just the new sanctions,
Speaker 1: but it's also the talk about sending in Tomahawk cruise missiles.
Speaker 1: It's not just continuation, but it is escalation, escalation of
Speaker 1: the sanctions, escalation of the arming. So the massive military
Speaker 1: build up in the Caribbean, talk about how they're going
Speaker 1: to escalate this to the next level. Dividing, Maga says,
Speaker 1: the new American they're looking at, you know where Trump
Speaker 1: has been this last year and throwing out the founding
Speaker 1: father's wisdom. So the good news is that neo conservative
Speaker 1: foreign policy is finally being criticized as should and so
Speaker 1: maybe that will be his legacy to wake people up.
Speaker 1: So she says that he is egging on threats against
Speaker 1: her death threats. Well, he is egging on everything. He
Speaker 1: is the man not a peace a man of conflict
Speaker 1: and of chaos. And we're going to talk about that
Speaker 1: coming up, but before we do, I want to talk
Speaker 1: about this fourth turning and where we are and this
Speaker 1: and how we're rapidly escalating and maybe some of the
Speaker 1: things that we all should think about doing to help ourselves.
Speaker 1: I'm Marty, thank you very much. That's very generous. I
Speaker 1: appreciate that, he says, raise the gauge. Thank you, Marty.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. And DGA, thank you for the tippy,
Speaker 1: says David. This MAGA cult is completely out of touch
Speaker 1: at how Trump is in full out decline. There if
Speaker 1: use to acknowledge it, they're for rude awakening when the
Speaker 1: mid terms become a bloodbath. Yes, I agree, I think,
Speaker 1: you know, I think one of the worst political readings
Speaker 1: I've ever seen is the GOP reaction in general to
Speaker 1: the No King's rally. They just dismissed it as an
Speaker 1: AstroTurf thing paid for by sorrows, And the first one was,
Speaker 1: but this one was not. That This was a reaction
Speaker 1: even not understanding everybody having the T shirt saying I
Speaker 1: am Antifa. What they were saying was, you can't label
Speaker 1: a particular group as being a terrorist on your own.
Speaker 1: We don't want to have a present that does that.
Speaker 1: And you know they should be the Republicans should be
Speaker 1: pushing back against that because we saw that being done
Speaker 1: with Biden. But the Republican response was, oh yeah, well
Speaker 1: what about Biden and J six. It's like, you know,
Speaker 1: what about Biden and J six? Do you want to
Speaker 1: firmly establish that precedent now by having Trump do it?
Speaker 1: So then we have now had a Democrat do it
Speaker 1: and a Republican do it. So now this is what
Speaker 1: they're all going to do. Whenever they win. They're going
Speaker 1: to come after their opponents. They'll use absurd indictments if necessary,
Speaker 1: but they're going to come after the opponents when they lose.
Speaker 1: We've always criticized the totalitarian governments that have done this,
Speaker 1: so it's been one of the criticisms of Zelensky in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: They locks up his opponents after he wins the election.
Speaker 1: Do we want to have that happen in America? And
Speaker 1: do we want to have people who exercise their constitutional
Speaker 1: right to protest being charged with violence because speech is
Speaker 1: violence and lock them up the way we saw the
Speaker 1: JA sixers done. No, the J sixers ought to be
Speaker 1: standing the most firm against what Trump is doing, because
Speaker 1: he is cementing into place what Biden was doing in
Speaker 1: the same way that Biden did that for Trump with
Speaker 1: the COVID nonsense and the pandemic stuff. And he says,
Speaker 1: David Trump endorses Lindsay Graham, Randy Fine, and Elise Tefanic
Speaker 1: while promising to primary constitutionalists Massey and MTG and MAGA
Speaker 1: can't see that Trump has absolutely no respect for the
Speaker 1: constant and those three people that you mentioned there, they
Speaker 1: are one hundred percent for Israel, not one hundred percent
Speaker 1: for America, and they are completely owned by a foreign government. Real,
Speaker 1: Jason Barker says to Liberty Venal. He said, Venezuela is
Speaker 1: a stopgap move to continue the dollar system for a
Speaker 1: short time till the stable coin and tokenization is complete.
Speaker 1: It is a huge topic. Well, I agree with that.
Speaker 1: I think there's a lot of economic issues with that,
Speaker 1: and Venezuela is very rich in terms of mineral things
Speaker 1: and other things like that. But and it is you know,
Speaker 1: when you look at it, it's going to be a
Speaker 1: major wag the dog distraction, just like the bombings were
Speaker 1: for Bill Clinton. So it checks a lot of different
Speaker 1: boxes and it's going to be certainly happening shortly. I
Speaker 1: think real Octo Spook asks where's Travis? I miss his offerings?
Speaker 1: I do too, I missed the chance to take a
Speaker 1: drink and have a break speaking here. He is in
Speaker 1: Austin and they had a doctor's appointment excuse me this
Speaker 1: morning that they could not reschedule. And I told him
Speaker 1: I wanted him there guarding his son and make sure
Speaker 1: that nothing funky happens with that. And so he'll be
Speaker 1: back tomorrow. And we do miss him here. Timed non
Speaker 1: Tide says, what do you think of Mexican uprising against
Speaker 1: their Jewish president in the context of governments around the
Speaker 1: world selling out to Israel hard to join leftist protests. Well,
Speaker 1: that may be something of a factor. I'm not so
Speaker 1: short and certain though. I've seen many attributions of that,
Speaker 1: and you know, if you want to see what that
Speaker 1: looks like, this is what is happening in Mexico City.
Speaker 1: Truly is amazing. The violence that erupted over the weekend,
Speaker 1: and it's not just this level of violence fighting with
Speaker 1: the police, but they also have broken into buildings. There's
Speaker 1: other videos then breaking into the palace there in Mexico
Speaker 1: they called a palace. Of course, Trump is busy building
Speaker 1: a palace here in America for the president to live
Speaker 1: in and pulling things down. What did you say, Lance, Yeah,
Speaker 1: and I.
Speaker 2: Was just saying that first video you played was pretty amazing.
Speaker 2: If you continue it, they grab one cop and pull
Speaker 2: him away from the rest of him and start beating
Speaker 2: him on the ground.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, And here's some more scenes with Actually this
Speaker 1: is mostly peaceful media, and so a lot of people say, well,
Speaker 1: these are the sorrows people, and you know, they want
Speaker 1: to let these people come into the United States. Here
Speaker 1: you go, this is a one cop getting pulled out
Speaker 1: and beaten. And you know, there's different ways we can
Speaker 1: look at this. We can look at it as a
Speaker 1: standpoint of frustration rising around the world. And I don't
Speaker 1: think it's simple gen Z frustration, although that is a
Speaker 1: headline of some of the stuff, but it is general
Speaker 1: frustration because folks, there's this concentration of wealth and they're
Speaker 1: not even trying to pretend otherwise anymore. So this is
Speaker 1: pulled back from perspective where you can see how large
Speaker 1: the crowd was. It was not just isolated things. And
Speaker 1: then they actually got into the the palace there and
Speaker 1: they're throwing furniture out, smashing it on the ground, throwing
Speaker 1: it out the window.
Speaker 2: They call the gen Z protests, but most of these
Speaker 2: people look older.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right. Well, we're going to take a break
Speaker 1: and we're talking about the four twenty when we come back.
Speaker 1: A couple more comments here. Bin Laden ben Laden Bernanki,
Speaker 1: the local police commentator, a political commentator, talked about the
Speaker 1: ham sandwich thrower as if he was a rapist or
Speaker 1: a bank robber, another brainwashed maggot. Yep, Yeah, truly is amazing.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know that is that is not violence.
Speaker 1: And we talked about that last week and well you
Speaker 1: ain't got mustard dorm my bullet proof vest here. You know,
Speaker 1: it's like it's like an up snowflake. The government claims
Speaker 1: to have ownership of frequency mental rights er ETCA, says
Speaker 1: real Jason Barker nice of the storm. Yeah, I do
Speaker 1: not concur we have tort law to deal with people
Speaker 1: harming others. Yes, I think he's responding to the FCC stuff. Again,
Speaker 1: I don't think the government has that or should have
Speaker 1: that right. It reminds me very much of jolly old
Speaker 1: England where you could not hunt in the forest because
Speaker 1: all the deer belonged to the king and things like that. No,
Speaker 1: I don't think that is the case. And of course
Speaker 1: we've seen in California efforts there in other places to
Speaker 1: say that the rain that is falling doesn't belong to you, you
Speaker 1: can't collect it. You know, that belongs to the state.
Speaker 1: So there's no limit to what they will try to
Speaker 1: take control of. We're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 1: and we'll be right back. You're listening to the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show.
Speaker 12: Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass, APS radio
Speaker 12: has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels
Speaker 12: on our app at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 1: Well, welcome back, folks, and this came in just as
Speaker 1: program is going. This is from Francis. Thank you for
Speaker 1: the contribution on cash app and if you would like
Speaker 1: to support the program, you can find links to do
Speaker 1: that at cash app at zel. We have a lot
Speaker 1: of people who support us on subscribe Star. We really
Speaker 1: do appreciate that and if you are a Subscribe Star subscriber,
Speaker 1: Travis posts up the show every day. We have a
Speaker 1: podcast that does not have commercials on it, and he
Speaker 1: also posts up the description as well as the articles
Speaker 1: that we use in the day's show. Also, I want
Speaker 1: to thank people who have contributed the last couple of
Speaker 1: days on cash app Jeffrey A. And Brian P. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much. And I want to appreciate this card
Speaker 1: that Lisa sent to us. Thank you very much for this.
Speaker 1: I really do appreciate that. Karen is in Florida right
Speaker 1: now and both her dad died a week before her
Speaker 1: brother suddenly died. He was ninety six, and so they're
Speaker 1: having a joint service in Florida this week and she's
Speaker 1: down there. But I want to talk about the fourth
Speaker 1: turning before we run out of time here, because I
Speaker 1: thought this is a very good article. You'll find it
Speaker 1: on zero Hedge. It actually originally came from the Gold
Speaker 1: and Geopolitics substack, and I thought he did a pretty
Speaker 1: good job of introducing the concept of fourth turning. It's
Speaker 1: something that I've done videos on the passive matter of factor.
Speaker 1: One of the first videos I did when I went
Speaker 1: to Info Wars about twelve years ago, and it's important
Speaker 1: to see the time that we're in. There are a
Speaker 1: few people who talk about it, but most people won't.
Speaker 1: They'll talk about gen Z, gen X, millennials and all
Speaker 1: the rest of this stuff. Where did those terms come from?
Speaker 1: Came from Strauss and how a couple of guys who
Speaker 1: went back and dead project. They called it generations, and
Speaker 1: they started talking about these different generations about twenty years apart,
Speaker 1: and then they noticed that there was a cycle that
Speaker 1: about every four generations you would have a major restructuring
Speaker 1: of society. They called it the fourth Turning. And they
Speaker 1: went back and they identified this trend in five hundred
Speaker 1: years of American and British history. And then they pointed
Speaker 1: out the same type of thing was happening now globally
Speaker 1: because we had because of telecommunications and technology, we have
Speaker 1: now become synchronized, if you will, in terms of these periods,
Speaker 1: and so we are at that point in time. And
Speaker 1: this is a very interesting article because it kind of
Speaker 1: first he gives you a general overview, and then it
Speaker 1: talks about a little bit about how the generations are
Speaker 1: shaping up. You know, the words, what role do these
Speaker 1: different generations play in each of these cycles, and then
Speaker 1: it talks most importantly about some possible scenarios and some
Speaker 1: possible outcomes that are happening here. As he points out,
Speaker 1: the fourth turning crisis began with the Lehman Brothers collapse
Speaker 1: in two thousand and eight, is predicted in the early
Speaker 1: nineties by Strauss and Howe. They said, sometime in the
Speaker 1: mid two thousands, there will be a financial crisis that
Speaker 1: will have global issues that will begin the fourth turning.
Speaker 1: Because all of these fourth turnings are always about economics
Speaker 1: and usually about war, and so that's exactly what happened.
Speaker 1: The Federal Reserve, then the balance sheet exploded from nine
Speaker 1: hundred billion to four trillion in just a matter of years,
Speaker 1: then to nine trillion during COVID. The national debt, which
Speaker 1: stood at ten trillion dollars in two thousand and eight,
Speaker 1: has now reached thirty seven trillion as of August the
Speaker 1: twenty fifth. This is why I say the role of
Speaker 1: Trump has been as an accelerationist and also to promote chaos,
Speaker 1: and that is exactly what's happened. He put us on
Speaker 1: a completely different trajectory, and it's one that was maintained
Speaker 1: by Biden and is still being maintained by Trump. We
Speaker 1: didn't solve the crisis. We papered over it with printed money,
Speaker 1: and we kicked the can down the The response to
Speaker 1: the two thousand and eight crisis revealed something critical that
Speaker 1: our institutions no longer functioned as they were designed. The
Speaker 1: banks that should have failed were declared too big to fail.
Speaker 1: The very people who caused the crisis not only avoided jail,
Speaker 1: but got bonuses funded by taxpayer bailouts. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, this is what Larry Fink made his mark
Speaker 1: doing all this stuff. He profited tremendously from this Larry
Speaker 1: Fink and Black Rock turning. This fourth Turning differs fundamentally
Speaker 1: from all previous ones because of the role of technology.
Speaker 1: The battlefield isn't Gettysburg or Normandy. It's your smartphone screen,
Speaker 1: your social media feed, your digital wallet. Previous Fourth turnings
Speaker 1: required mass mobilization of physical bodies. Men marched to war,
Speaker 1: women worked in factories, everyone bought war bonds. Physical presence mattered.
Speaker 1: But our Fourth Turning now is being fought in the
Speaker 1: realm of information and perception. When you can't trust any
Speaker 1: source of information, when deep fakes make it seem no
Speaker 1: longer believing. When AI can generate unlimited propaganda at zero
Speaker 1: marginal cost, how do you know what you're fighting for
Speaker 1: or what you're fighting against. The fog of war has
Speaker 1: become the fog of everything, and the COVID nineteen so
Speaker 1: called pandemic, accelerated this technological authoritarianism by decades. Well, I
Speaker 1: would say it was always the plan. They rolled that
Speaker 1: out just at the beginning of the twenty first century,
Speaker 1: along with the fake nine Loveman attack, not fake in
Speaker 1: the sense that nobody died, but fake as a false
Speaker 1: flag attack. Again, every fourth turning includes a monetary reset.
Speaker 1: The Revolution gave us the Constitution's gold and Silver clause.
Speaker 1: The Civil War brought greenbacks and the national banking system.
Speaker 1: The depression of World War II ended the goal standard
Speaker 1: domestically and created Breton woods. The US national debt now
Speaker 1: stands at thirty seven trillion as of August. Unfunded liabilities,
Speaker 1: social Security, Medicare, government pensions now exceed two hundred trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: The Federal Reserve holds over trillion dollars in unrealized losses.
Speaker 1: Commercial banks sit on six hundred billion in underwater securities.
Speaker 1: We're not approaching insolvency. We're already there, just one repricing
Speaker 1: away from systemic collapse, and everyone in finance knows it.
Speaker 1: The only question is whether it will happen slowly with
Speaker 1: inflation or suddenly with a default, or systematically with a
Speaker 1: CBDC rollout, or I would say a stable coin rollout.
Speaker 1: He said, my money actually is literally on all of
Speaker 1: the above. Yeah, it happens slowly and then suddenly. But
Speaker 1: perhaps the most devastating loss is not monetary or military,
Speaker 1: but moral. The West built its post Roll War two
Speaker 1: hegemony not on just our military might and our economic power,
Speaker 1: but on moral authority. We are the quote good guys
Speaker 1: unquote who defeated fascism, rebuilt Europe, and championed democracy and
Speaker 1: human rights. But that moral high ground is gone, destroyed
Speaker 1: by our own hypocrisy. Take Ukraine, for example. How would
Speaker 1: American reactive China formed a military alliance with Mexico and
Speaker 1: stationed missions in Tijuana missiles and Tijuana. We know exactly
Speaker 1: because we saw the Cuban missile crisis. And we've made
Speaker 1: this point from the very beginning. And so what do
Speaker 1: people think of the response of Russia is going to
Speaker 1: be when we aggressively move toward them. It's not to
Speaker 1: excuse what they did in Ukraine, but it's just to
Speaker 1: understand how people are going to react. These types of
Speaker 1: people who run governments are going to react. The moral
Speaker 1: bankruptcy that we have now accelerates the Fourth Turnings institution collapse.
Speaker 1: And that's another important aspect of Trump's role in all
Speaker 1: of this. His moral bankruptcy helps to do a collapse
Speaker 1: of the rule of law and of people's faith and
Speaker 1: government and the idea that we have different branches of government.
Speaker 1: Of course, the unitary executive idea where we have a dictator,
Speaker 1: a czar who's going to do whatever he wishes. That
Speaker 1: has always been the desire of our current leaders, our
Speaker 1: modern leaders. He's bringing it to fruition. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, Ryan who had mentioned the film that was
Speaker 1: done by the guy who did the Big Short, He
Speaker 1: had done one on Dick Cheney, and it was I
Speaker 1: didn't enjoy it as much as I did The Big Short,
Speaker 1: because I don't know, I just get tired of watching politicians.
Speaker 1: But you know, that was the unitary executive, was what
Speaker 1: Dick Cheney was about all along. You know, They've been
Speaker 1: laying the foundation for this stuff, going back to the
Speaker 1: false fire nine to eleven. Saudi Arabia, America's most important
Speaker 1: Arab of all, license forty five, is now buying Chinese fighters,
Speaker 1: pricing well in Yuan and coordinating with Russia and production cuts.
Speaker 1: In other words, Petro dollar is dead. So but the
Speaker 1: real prize is Taiwan. If China takes Taiwan increasingly likely
Speaker 1: given wargame results, without an American military re sponsor, the
Speaker 1: entire American alliance system will collapse overnight. Japan, South Korea,
Speaker 1: the Philippines, Australia would have to accommodate China. The dollar
Speaker 1: would lose reserve status as countries realize that American security
Speaker 1: guarantees are worthless. It wouldn't be a military defeat, but
Speaker 1: it'd be a psychological collapse, the moment everybody realizes that
Speaker 1: the emperor has no clothes. And this, folks, is another
Speaker 1: reason why Trump is being so belligerent with Venezuela. It's
Speaker 1: there too, just like you know, if you were to,
Speaker 1: I think he's doing it like doing a a nuclear
Speaker 1: missile test. Look, this is the power that we have.
Speaker 1: Let me show you the power that we've got, and
Speaker 1: so I think that's a part of it. Distraction is
Speaker 1: a part of it. Taking their oil is a part
Speaker 1: of it. And then there's also their geopolitical arguments that
Speaker 1: they have been allied with Cuba, with Russia, with China,
Speaker 1: even with Iran, and so for all those reasons they
Speaker 1: want to go after Venezuela. It is a done deal.
Speaker 1: It is going to happen. It's only a matter of timing,
Speaker 1: and it will be timed for the best political advantage
Speaker 1: in the opinion of Trump. And of course it also
Speaker 1: helps to establish this long standing trend towards a czar
Speaker 1: instead of a president, a caesar instead of a president.
Speaker 1: So the loss of Taiwan wouldn't be a military defeat,
Speaker 1: but a psychological collapse, the moment that everyone realizes that
Speaker 1: the emperor has no clothes. The tragedy is that America's military,
Speaker 1: despite spending more than the next ten nations come bind,
Speaker 1: can't win wars anymore. We couldn't defeat the Taliban after
Speaker 1: twenty years. We can't build ships that work, the literal
Speaker 1: combat ship that means a shallow water. The Zoomwalk destroyer
Speaker 1: and the Ford class carrier programs are all disasters. We
Speaker 1: can't even supply Ukraine with a enough one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty five millimeters shelves the most basic artillery ammunition. The
Speaker 1: military industrial complex is optimized for profit, not for victory,
Speaker 1: and now we are going to pay the price. The boomers, who,
Speaker 1: if you look at the fourth turning, would be called
Speaker 1: the profit generation. The Moses generation, for example, should be
Speaker 1: the gray Champions, providing moral clarity during the crisis. Instead
Speaker 1: they are the crisis. Biden, Trump, Pelosi, McConnell, all in
Speaker 1: their eighties or late seventies, all clinging to power like
Speaker 1: Gollum to his precious The oldest president in American history
Speaker 1: followed by the second oldest in history. Congress looks like
Speaker 1: a nursing home. The Supreme Court is a gerontocracy. They
Speaker 1: won't pass the torch. They will have to be pride
Speaker 1: from their cold, dead hands. But which boomer is the
Speaker 1: great Champion? Trump fits the archetype, a charismatic elder who
Speaker 1: emerges during a crisis to remake society. But great champions
Speaker 1: are supposed to unite society for collective purpose. Trump, however,
Speaker 1: is dividing as much as he inspires, and maybe that's
Speaker 1: the point, Maybe this fourth Turning's Gray Champion destroys the
Speaker 1: old order rather than defending it. So Generation X, he says,
Speaker 1: of forty five to sixty, said, my generation, we're playing
Speaker 1: out the role of nomads perfectly. We are cynical survivors,
Speaker 1: building escape routes. We're the ones stacking gold, learning skills,
Speaker 1: moving to rural areas, homeschooling our kids. We don't believe
Speaker 1: in collective anything because every institution has failed us. But
Speaker 1: as some millennials, he said, twenty nine to forty four
Speaker 1: who worry me, they're supposed to be the hero generation,
Speaker 1: the ones who should come together, sacrifice for the collective purpose,
Speaker 1: and rebuild from the ashes. Previous hero generations, like the
Speaker 1: Republicans who fought the Revolution, the Guilden who won the
Speaker 1: Civil War, the GI generation that defeated fascism had external
Speaker 1: enemies to unite against. But this generation can't even agree
Speaker 1: on basic reality. Half of them want socialism without understanding
Speaker 1: that socialism requires a social adhesion that they don't have.
Speaker 1: The other half chase wealth through crypto and day trading
Speaker 1: while living in their parents' basements. They're the most educated
Speaker 1: generation in history, but they can't do basic repairs. They're
Speaker 1: the most connected, but say at the same time the
Speaker 1: loneliest loneliest. They're supposed to be heroes, but they're barely
Speaker 1: functional adults. Maybe that's harsh, but forth Turnings don't care
Speaker 1: about hurt feelings. The problem is it might be that
Speaker 1: this generation's crisis is just too abstract. Climate change is
Speaker 1: a perfect example, and ever shifting never reached goal that
Speaker 1: keeps moving further away the closer we supposedly get. That's
Speaker 1: because it is a lie and an illusion. COVID was scary,
Speaker 1: but not scary enough. A ninety nine percent survival rate
Speaker 1: does not mobilize people like Pearl, Harbor, gen Z and
Speaker 1: Alpha are emerging artists are being shaped by this crisis
Speaker 1: in ways that we don't yet understand. They are growing
Speaker 1: up with secrets with screens, whether instead of friends, with algorithms,
Speaker 1: instead of thoughts with anxiety. As a baseline, previous artist
Speaker 1: generations were overprotected physically but connected socially. This one is
Speaker 1: overprotected digitally but isolated physically. So at every fourth turning
Speaker 1: includes cultural revolution, the complete inversion of previous values. So
Speaker 1: we check that we have the traditional family structure is
Speaker 1: now heteronormative oppression. Having children is now supposedly selfish environmental destruction.
Speaker 1: Marriage is a patriarchal enslave me. We're not just tolerating dysfunction,
Speaker 1: we are celebrating it. The gender revolution is particularly telling
Speaker 1: no content with equal rights a worthy goal achieved decades ago.
Speaker 1: Rather not content with equal rights, We've moved to denying
Speaker 1: biological reality itself, saying that men can be women and
Speaker 1: women can be men, and children can choose their sex
Speaker 1: as they choose breakfast cereal. We treat men become women,
Speaker 1: and women become men, and children are treated like adults,
Speaker 1: and adults are treated like children. It's a complete inversion.
Speaker 1: He says. This, however, is not organic social evolution. It
Speaker 1: has engineered chaos, and so we know all these things right.
Speaker 1: The interesting thing about this is his observations and his
Speaker 1: scenarios that he sees, because we see some of the
Speaker 1: same ones. The purpose of cultural revolution is not progress,
Speaker 1: it's demoralization. When you can make people affirm obviously lies,
Speaker 1: you have broken their spirit. That's one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why Solji Nitsen wrote the essay Live not by Lies,
Speaker 1: because you break their spirit if you make them live
Speaker 1: by the lies. When you can make them betray their children,
Speaker 1: you have broken their souls. When nothing is sacred, nothing
Speaker 1: is worth defending. A demoralized population does not resist tyranny.
Speaker 1: It welcomes it as relief from chaos. Is this not
Speaker 1: the society that we see here? I mean when I
Speaker 1: see people out there cheering what Trump is doing in
Speaker 1: these cities again, going to the places where he knows
Speaker 1: he's going to have conflict because he desires conflict. You know,
Speaker 1: people are welcoming that as a relief from chaos. They said.
Speaker 1: Cultural revolutions create their own anybodies. However, the more extreme
Speaker 1: to push, the more violent, will be the snap back.
Speaker 1: Parents discovering what schools are teaching their kids become activated.
Speaker 1: Workers forced to struggle session into struggle sessions for critical
Speaker 1: race theory and other things like that, will become normal.
Speaker 1: People told that they're evil for being normal don't stay normal.
Speaker 1: They become resistance. And so it's going to activate people.
Speaker 1: So he sees a few scenarios. I think it's worth
Speaker 1: going through real quickly. We don't have much time here.
Speaker 1: Here's some resolution scenarios for the twenty thirties. He said,
Speaker 1: this fourth turning will resolve sometime between twenty twenty eight
Speaker 1: and twenty thirty three. But resolution doesn't mean a return
Speaker 1: to normal, It means transformation into something unrecognizable. He said,
Speaker 1: here's some of the possibilities as I see them. First
Speaker 1: of all, he thinks the most likely one is a breakup,
Speaker 1: a financial breakup. Not necessarily a secession in civil war,
Speaker 1: but a financial breakup that is more like a kind
Speaker 1: of exhausted dissolution, you know, like kind of what we
Speaker 1: saw at the end of COVID was that people woke
Speaker 1: up and said that's it, not playing this game anymore,
Speaker 1: and came after the people who imposed it. They just
Speaker 1: kind of passively resisted by not complying anymore, kind of
Speaker 1: walking away. So he said, Trump is losing everything everywhere.
Speaker 1: He's already lost Ukraine, Congress won't fund anymore, Europe can't
Speaker 1: sustain it alone. He loses Iran. They get a bomb
Speaker 1: while he is tweeting threats, and he tries to bully
Speaker 1: Venezuela and so forth as economic policies as well. Each
Speaker 1: loss emboldens the next challenger, and the world realizes that
Speaker 1: the emperor truly has no clothes, seeing that he is
Speaker 1: losing both militarily and morally, with Israel's ongoing genocide and
Speaker 1: Gaza destroying what remained of American moral authority, Trump does
Speaker 1: what all failing empires do. He turns inward, but this
Speaker 1: creates an economic catastrophe. His terrorists, meant to punish others
Speaker 1: punish Americans with inflation. His pressure on the Fed to
Speaker 1: cut rates despite soaring prices destroys dollar credibility. He continues
Speaker 1: weaponization of the US dollar, and the swift drives even
Speaker 1: allies to seek alternatives. Suddenly, all those dollars held overseas
Speaker 1: come flooding home, tens of trillion seeking safety as global
Speaker 1: trade abandons the greenback and the dollar hyperinflates into toilet paper.
Speaker 1: The resulting inflation is in the nineteen seventies over again.
Speaker 1: It is the Vaimar Republic, where bread costs fifty dollars
Speaker 1: in gas sets twenty dollars a gallon. Society doesn't slowly decay,
Speaker 1: it collapses. Supply chains that never fully recovered from COVID
Speaker 1: snap completely. Blue states, which never really accepted Trump's legitimacy anyway,
Speaker 1: make it official. California stops sending tax revenue to Washington.
Speaker 1: They fund a government wi FI, a government that hates you.
Speaker 1: In New York follows suit, as do many other Democrat areas.
Speaker 1: By twenty thirty five, America follows the Soviet playback, not
Speaker 1: a violent collapse, but exhausted dissolution. The federal government, like
Speaker 1: Gorbachev's Kremlin, simply becomes irrelevant. States stop listening, regions form
Speaker 1: their own arrangements. In one day, everyone realizes that the
Speaker 1: US exists only on maps that nobody updates anymore. The
Speaker 1: empire doesn't fall, but it evaporates. But then he said,
Speaker 1: there's another possibility, of course, and that is increasingly possible,
Speaker 1: that it would not just dissolve away, but not through
Speaker 1: formal secession, but through nullification and non cooperation. Red states
Speaker 1: refusing to enforce federal gun laws, Blue states refusing to
Speaker 1: enforce immigration law, both refusing to send tax revenue for
Speaker 1: programs that they oppose. The federal government, broke and impotent,
Speaker 1: can't enforce its will. The military, asked to fire on Americans,
Speaker 1: refuses or splits. Washington becomes ceremonial, while real power devolves
Speaker 1: two regions. The Pacific States form an economic union with
Speaker 1: Canada and Asia. Texas remembers it was once a republic,
Speaker 1: and the Northeast alliance with Europe. The heartland goes its
Speaker 1: own way. By twenty thirty five, America exists on paper
Speaker 1: but not in practice. The dollar is replaced by regional
Speaker 1: currencies are bitcoined. The military splits into state militias. The
Speaker 1: federal government maintains embassies and negotiates treaties, but has no
Speaker 1: domestic power. It is not a civil war, but a
Speaker 1: civilized divorce. Messy, expensive, but better than the alternative. And
Speaker 1: again I've said this many times, rather than secession, You're
Speaker 1: want to have nullification rather than because secession will be war.
Speaker 1: So the war resolution plausible, but dangerous. A flashpoint overseas,
Speaker 1: maybe Taiwan, maybe Iran. The war isn't won or lost.
Speaker 1: It just ends when everyone is exhausted. And then he
Speaker 1: said the transformation hopeful, but unlikely. He said, by twenty
Speaker 1: thirty five, America is smaller globally but stronger domestically. This
Speaker 1: is the scenario that I hope to have happened. I think, though,
Speaker 1: that this scenario would require the collapse of the American dollar,
Speaker 1: which supports the geo political aspirations. And he said, so
Speaker 1: what should we do about this? This is what I
Speaker 1: haven't gotten into yet. Hang on, let's not close program out,
Speaker 1: jah at Lance. I'm want to go a little bit
Speaker 1: longer here. So his point is, so what does this
Speaker 1: mean for you? Because this is what we need to
Speaker 1: talk about, not just what is the threat, but what
Speaker 1: do we do first and foremost? Except that this is
Speaker 1: structural and not political. These are things that transcend politics.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter which tribe is in control. This is
Speaker 1: something that These are forces that are bigger than any
Speaker 1: political party, bigger than any of these individual issues. And
Speaker 1: this is going to be coming. It'll differ. Different parties
Speaker 1: will react in different ways to it, says. Your candidate
Speaker 1: winning is not going to fix this. Your party taking
Speaker 1: control won't stop this. The system itself is what is breaking,
Speaker 1: and it needs to break for something new to emerge.
Speaker 1: Fighting to preserve the current system is like trying to
Speaker 1: hold back water. It is exhausting and it is futile.
Speaker 1: Better to prepare for spring while others are freezing. Secondly,
Speaker 1: says position yourself from multiple scenarios. Geographic diversification matters. Have
Speaker 1: something somewhere else that you can go to if your
Speaker 1: area becomes untenable. This doesn't mean fleeing the country necessarily,
Speaker 1: but having options a rural property, a family in another state,
Speaker 1: even just camping gear and a plan. When cities burned
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, of those who could leave dead and
Speaker 1: those who couldn't suffered. Financial diversification is crucial, but it
Speaker 1: is also complicated. He says, Yes, own gold and silver,
Speaker 1: but physical metal that you can hold, not etf promises,
Speaker 1: not paper gold, paper silver. But also understand their limitations.
Speaker 1: Gold doesn't earn yield, silver is bulky. Both can be
Speaker 1: confiscated or taxed. Diversify across jurisdictions, asset classes and storage methods.
Speaker 1: Some gold in a safe, some silver buried, some bitcoin
Speaker 1: and cold storage, some cash and small bills. And again
Speaker 1: these are not necessarily the things that I would recommend,
Speaker 1: But his idea is diversify the way that you're hollingus.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't necessarily put anything in a safety deposit box
Speaker 1: that is most easily stolen. Place to get some but
Speaker 1: you know, spread stuff around, It's what he's saying. And
Speaker 1: have gold, silver, some cash, some barterable goods like ammunition, alcohol, antibotics.
Speaker 1: Don't put all your eggs in any basket because all
Speaker 1: baskets will have holes. Skills diversification might matter the most.
Speaker 1: Learn to grow food. Even apartment dwellers can grow something.
Speaker 1: Learn to fix things very important when supply chains break,
Speaker 1: repair becomes invaluable. Learn self defense when police won't come,
Speaker 1: you're on your own. Learn to teach your children. You
Speaker 1: might need homeschooling, you need that anyway. And by the way,
Speaker 1: you know, only just put in a plug here for
Speaker 1: the Civil Devents Manual. That's going to teach you a
Speaker 1: lot of this stuff that you need to have. It's
Speaker 1: nothing gonna teach you how to repair things, but teach
Speaker 1: you a lot of the other or his facial skills
Speaker 1: as well as things that you can learn individually. Go
Speaker 1: to David Night Gold which take you tony Ardburn. That's
Speaker 1: where you can get physical gold and silver and that
Speaker 1: should be a part of your planning. And then he
Speaker 1: says building community is essential, but it is also difficult. Again,
Speaker 1: Civil Defense Manual has a lot to offer in that area.
Speaker 1: Mental preparation matters more than physical and I would say
Speaker 1: not mental, but spiritual preparation. That is what's going to
Speaker 1: get you through this. That is going to be your foundation.
Speaker 1: It's going to be your relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ.
Speaker 1: To understand that there are things that are longer and
Speaker 1: more important than the short period of time we have
Speaker 1: on this earth. This crisis will last years more. You
Speaker 1: can't maintain panic that long. You will burn out. You
Speaker 1: need to have sustainable vigilance, need to be alert but
Speaker 1: not anxious, Prepared but not paranoid. History is your friend here,
Speaker 1: Christ is your friend here. What he's saying is get
Speaker 1: a broader perspective while the ultimate broad perspective is eternal.
Speaker 1: Understand that a crisis is normal, that is not exceptional,
Speaker 1: and most importantly, understand that you are living through history
Speaker 1: and not the end of it, and that tomorrow, folks,
Speaker 1: is not promised anyway to any of us. So the
Speaker 1: fourth turning suggests that we have about five more years
Speaker 1: of crisis before resolution, five years of increasing chaos, conflict
Speaker 1: and transformation. Five years it will feel like fifty five years.
Speaker 1: It will determine the next fifty and so what are
Speaker 1: you going to do about it? And that's the key
Speaker 1: thing again. You don't want to panic, you will burn out.
Speaker 1: You need vigilance, but not to be anxious. You need
Speaker 1: to be prepared but not paranoid. So again, watch but
Speaker 1: don't freak out. Have that foundation in your life because
Speaker 1: that is the thing that matters the most in this life.
Speaker 1: And I wish we had time to go into more
Speaker 1: of this, but I don't. Thank you very much for
Speaker 1: the tip d G eight, He said, Owen just put
Speaker 1: out a great video about how MAGA is failing America
Speaker 1: is basically dead. How much your relationship with him. He'd
Speaker 1: be a great guest if he's been fair to I
Speaker 1: don't have any personal issues with Owen, but I think
Speaker 1: that you know, his role in the sting I thought
Speaker 1: was just appalling. And so, yeah, is it really news
Speaker 1: that MAGA is failing America and is basically dead? I
Speaker 1: don't think so. I just don't know what to say
Speaker 1: about that. I'll leave it there. Thank you for joining us,
Speaker 1: and you can play us out now on Lance the
Speaker 1: common Man. They created common Core, the dumbed down our children.
Speaker 1: They created common Past to track and control us. They're
Speaker 1: Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing, and
Speaker 1: the communist future. They see the common man as simple,
Speaker 1: unsophisticated ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity
Speaker 1: created in the image of God. That is what we
Speaker 1: have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Speaker 1: Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire
Speaker 1: to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 1: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 1: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 1: find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 1: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 1: please keep us in your prayers. D davidknightshow dot.
Speaker 13: Com to
Speaker 10: Protects