Speaker 1: It doesn't really matter whether or not we always believe
Speaker 1: what they believe. It's that they believe it. In what
Speaker 1: they do with that belief system that's important. And again biblically,
Speaker 1: as you mentioned, we're told not to drink one and
Speaker 1: you know the big three things that are there in
Speaker 1: the New Covenant that James bound or to dealing of
Speaker 1: the drinking of blood and the sacrificing of idols and
Speaker 1: sexual sins, all of which were part of the giant culture,
Speaker 1: and that they used to drink these blood the blood
Speaker 1: for a number of reasons. One of the ones is
Speaker 1: they would pass down to us is that they are
Speaker 1: usurping control over those lower level beings of drinking their blood.
Speaker 1: So as you see it sort of allegorized in Dracula,
Speaker 1: they become like servants of Dracula, right, So it's part
Speaker 1: of that, you know, authority of a hierarchy as well,
Speaker 1: and so it's used to increase in their belief system
Speaker 1: of people that they can directly control.
Speaker 2: The disclaimer to the fair season Karen's out there, Oh
Speaker 2: dare you? I'll guests on the show do not reflect
Speaker 2: the opinions of the host. The purpose of the show
Speaker 2: is to have interesting conversations, stretch our minds and grow
Speaker 2: not what we want. If you are looking for an
Speaker 2: echo chamber viewer and listener, discretion's advised.
Speaker 1: Did you talk about extreme?
Speaker 3: What is happening and what is a Hold out your
Speaker 3: glass because we're about to feel it.
Speaker 2: Up torches high, you know, look at it from a
Speaker 2: different perspective, different perspective.
Speaker 1: Different oct.
Speaker 3: Hey guys, what is happening and what is up? Hold
Speaker 3: out your glass because you know what time it is.
Speaker 3: We are about to feel it. Welcome to the Prometheus
Speaker 3: Lens Podcast, the place where the conversations are always enlightening.
Speaker 3: I'm your host, Doc Brown. Here we'd like to use
Speaker 3: the allegory of the Prometheus Lens to take a second
Speaker 3: look at everything. Hey guys, if you knew to the channel,
Speaker 3: welcome to the Hero's Journey. Be sure and hit that
Speaker 3: like button and hit that subscribe button. Hey guys, let's
Speaker 3: just cut to the meat of the matter. I'm excited
Speaker 3: this is a gentleman that our conversations are always enlightening
Speaker 3: pun intended. He always blows my mind and I just
Speaker 3: love talking to this brother. Any chance that I can
Speaker 3: get it's been a few months so I'm excited to
Speaker 3: getting back on the show. But i'd like to welcome
Speaker 3: back to the show the Man, the Myth, the Legend, Gary, Wayne, Gary,
Speaker 3: thank you for coming back.
Speaker 1: Brother, Well, thank you for inviting me back. And always
Speaker 1: happy to be working with you and talking about some
Speaker 1: of the things that we get into, because I think
Speaker 1: some of the things we get into are things that
Speaker 1: other people aren't really familiar with, and if they're familiar with,
Speaker 1: they're not sure where that information would come from. So
Speaker 1: I think if we do what our normal, you know,
Speaker 1: mo is is, we'll raise a few eyebrows and create
Speaker 1: some curiosity and hopefully help people connect some dots. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Amen, Well, today I just want to, you know, kind
Speaker 3: of take a deep dive with you into the Dragon
Speaker 3: Court and the Dragon legacy. And you kind of touch
Speaker 3: on that in your book, and that led me down
Speaker 3: a path to checking out some other books and come
Speaker 3: to find out that you had read these books also,
Speaker 3: but you didn't cite them or use the material until
Speaker 3: your second book, and I was just really surprised how
Speaker 3: the story rhyme and just getting into this and I
Speaker 3: know we've touched on the Dragon Court, but I really
Speaker 3: want to take a deep dive with you and even
Speaker 3: go back to the genesis where it all started and
Speaker 3: what these guys believe. And that book that I'm referencing,
Speaker 3: we talked about it before. It's called The Dragon Legacy
Speaker 3: and it's the Secret history of an ancient bloodline by
Speaker 3: Nicholas de Vere And just to kick us off, Gary,
Speaker 3: I was wanting to read basically their genesis and what
Speaker 3: they believe about this Dragon courts sure that says in
Speaker 3: lil or Zeus. Jehovah further objected to the idea of
Speaker 3: investing in man the right to kingship and self rule,
Speaker 3: as this was, by tradition, the sole prerequisite of the
Speaker 3: Anonochi alone. A compromise was reached in the Dragon Council
Speaker 3: and it was decided that an Anonochi queen would incubate
Speaker 3: a human ovum fertilized by Inki or semi l Satan.
Speaker 3: The resulting child would be the first king or queen
Speaker 3: of the race of men, being mostly Anonachi. Several attempts
Speaker 3: were made at producing a suitable child, adopting varying permutations
Speaker 3: of the Ananochi human interaction. Semi l inseminated an al
Speaker 3: Joe woman, resulting in the birth of Adam, the first
Speaker 3: prototype of mortal kingship. The second experiment was between Inky
Speaker 3: semi l and Eve his daughter. The child they produced
Speaker 3: was Cain, who was mated with Lilith, the pure bred Anonochi,
Speaker 3: daughter of Lilith the Beautiful and Semil. To Lilith, Luluakin
Speaker 3: and their sacred offspring was given via Kershak, the Taria
Speaker 3: of the Dragon, not mortal kingship, from the hand of
Speaker 3: their father incy Semil, the rightful Overlord of the gods.
Speaker 3: Whilst Adam and his children were still considered by in
Speaker 3: Liel to be serfs. However, upon them the usurping in
Speaker 3: lil conveyed his own kingship without the authority of the
Speaker 3: Council of the Dragon Gods and Anachi. This he did
Speaker 3: an attempt to gain support from humanity for his illigumate
Speaker 3: claim to leadership of the Council. And it goes on.
Speaker 3: It talks about these these rings, we talk about the
Speaker 3: ring lords. It says that these rings became the symbol
Speaker 3: of kingship. They were apparently worn in memory of Prometheus,
Speaker 3: from whom all true kings were descended. These rings are
Speaker 3: alchemical or magical priest kingship of specifically dragon rings, which
Speaker 3: are symbolized by the alchemical or aboris the serpent or
Speaker 3: dragon that is eating his own tail. So this is
Speaker 3: basically their genesis and what they believe, and I just
Speaker 3: wanted to start with that baseline and see where we
Speaker 3: go from here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, very interesting, And that's not one of the quotes
Speaker 1: I use in book one or book two, but I
Speaker 1: give similar accountings from different sources on that of beginning,
Speaker 1: and that one is a bit confusing for people who
Speaker 1: may not be as well read on the occult. And
Speaker 1: I'm not encouraging that people should be experts on the occult,
Speaker 1: but it's mixing a lot of pantheons. There a number
Speaker 1: of pantheons, including the biblical some Biblical names, and so
Speaker 1: unless you understand how they look at their ancient religion
Speaker 1: as being an ancient source religion, that split into the
Speaker 1: different pantheons around the world. Because you have like Zeus
Speaker 1: in there with the Greek pantheon, you have Onleel and Ankey,
Speaker 1: you have same al, you have Lilith, and they consider
Speaker 1: all of those gods of the same pantheon. There's different
Speaker 1: sort of vernacular names so it can be a little
Speaker 1: bit hard to follow. But what they do do is
Speaker 1: give what I call a core doctrine and principle of polytheism,
Speaker 1: and that is the counterfeit everything done by God, but
Speaker 1: done in the image of this pantheon of gods, where
Speaker 1: they raise up Satan or Sammel, which is one of
Speaker 1: the names that they use for Satan, meaning the name
Speaker 1: in his seraphic seraphim dragon form. And notice the dragon
Speaker 1: imagery that they have in there, and that what they
Speaker 1: are doing with this is that they're lifting up Satan
Speaker 1: and the other gods to be equal with the God
Speaker 1: of the Bible. Because in a dualist religion, it's this
Speaker 1: perpetual yin and yang good versus evil, and nobody ever wins.
Speaker 1: It just continues. There's different ages, different catastrophes, but it
Speaker 1: just always sort of continues. And so that's core in there.
Speaker 1: But they also what is kor in their doctrine is
Speaker 1: to usurp the biblical history and we shape it into
Speaker 1: their history and to see all sorts of misinformation in there.
Speaker 1: For example, and we see it throughout Christianity today where
Speaker 1: a lot of people actually believe that Caine is the
Speaker 1: offspring of Satan or Sameel and or other archons as
Speaker 1: the Gnostics talks about, and they make a very good
Speaker 1: allegorical case for it, not literal but allegorical. I think
Speaker 1: it doesn't and I'm not against that notion, it just
Speaker 1: doesn't stand in my research up to the scrutiny of
Speaker 1: testing every definition that's changed with other scripture and does
Speaker 1: it fit in the sentence and doesn't fit with all
Speaker 1: of the scripture that goes with it. So as we
Speaker 1: look at how all of this sort of you know,
Speaker 1: comes back to an understanding from a monotheist perspective, we
Speaker 1: want to be aware of polytheist influence on information or
Speaker 1: misinformation that they're putting into Christianity. And so one of
Speaker 1: the red flags again not that I'm against the notion
Speaker 1: of Kane being son of Satan, but it's a standard
Speaker 1: polytheist doctrine with their interpretist allegorical approach, So it has
Speaker 1: the same mo from that doctrine that's used with a
Speaker 1: lot of people from inside the church. So I would
Speaker 1: encourage people to be careful with that because you're playing
Speaker 1: into their belief system. And again it may or may
Speaker 1: not be true. I just can't get there sort of biblically,
Speaker 1: but what it's done is it now has grafted the
Speaker 1: Bible into its own history, which they do within the Polychronicon,
Speaker 1: and they do with all sorts of their history, because
Speaker 1: they're saying Monotheism is the rogue rebellion, evil religion, and
Speaker 1: it is counterfeiting everything and changing it in its own
Speaker 1: image from what happened within the pantheon. So we have
Speaker 1: to look at things from the two religions as it is.
Speaker 1: They are polar opposites and each side views each other
Speaker 1: as evil. So we need to understand their tactics and
Speaker 1: factor that into our thought process if we want to
Speaker 1: use any of that within our monotheist Christian belief system.
Speaker 1: And it's tough to do at times because the allegorical
Speaker 1: approach is so seductive. But the problem is is you
Speaker 1: can make it mean anything you want it to mean,
Speaker 1: and what's the standard and the standard is only held
Speaker 1: by the adepts in the mystical religions in that sort
Speaker 1: of sort of thought process. So now we have this
Speaker 1: imagery that is part of the let's call it creation
Speaker 1: story of the two different blood lines, and maybe even
Speaker 1: more that are is the imagery of the dragon that's
Speaker 1: in there. And we've talked about that in terms of
Speaker 1: semel As being the seraphic sort of name and in Eden.
Speaker 1: And we should also note that within that belief system
Speaker 1: they name gad Reel in the Book of Enoch as
Speaker 1: the angel in Eden, and that g is part of
Speaker 1: the g in masonry, and one of it has many
Speaker 1: different allegories, but that's one of the names, and that
Speaker 1: means a wall of God. But again Ezekiel twenty eight
Speaker 1: says when Satan was in Eden is a trouble, not
Speaker 1: in a seraphic form, So again you see those subtle
Speaker 1: sort of nuances that one has to sort of take
Speaker 1: into account. So what they are saying now, though, is
Speaker 1: that there is an inferior race of Adamites. There is
Speaker 1: a race that has intermarriage coming out of the atom
Speaker 1: light through a few different venues. Lula Lilith, as you
Speaker 1: mentioned in there is the daughter of Lilith who in
Speaker 1: their accounting Mary's kine and Lilith is the one who
Speaker 1: is the consort before Eve that produces in some cases kine,
Speaker 1: but again not always consistent in the telling from it
Speaker 1: of that, but that's the lineage. So it would make
Speaker 1: sense from a polytheist perspective that the daughter of Lilith,
Speaker 1: who is going to bear a son with Adam, according
Speaker 1: to their insertion of this into the Bible, that happens
Speaker 1: in the Babylonian exile, And we don't get these Sumerian
Speaker 1: accounts before the Targum and the Babylonian exile, and it
Speaker 1: comes back with them. So that's where it begins in
Speaker 1: the Hebrewic history with the accountings of Lilith. But now
Speaker 1: you have a bloodline that is being created through Cain
Speaker 1: that creates them as giants and becomes part of the
Speaker 1: king's list. But it's a separate race than those that
Speaker 1: are created by the fallen angels through the oath of
Speaker 1: harm Anathema. But what it does do is pre is
Speaker 1: create a superior race to Adam, that's inferior to this
Speaker 1: other race that's going to intermarry. And then you have
Speaker 1: what you have a scion ing or an enobling of
Speaker 1: that bloodline. And that's essentially what a lot of that
Speaker 1: imagery is being talked about there, and that when we
Speaker 1: look at that dragon imagery, understand that seraphim angels, which
Speaker 1: are watcher angels just as trubam are watcher angels, just
Speaker 1: as archangels are watcher angels, just as ophanium are watcher angels.
Speaker 1: We need to understand that a seraphone is a dragon angel.
Speaker 1: It is a serpent faced, six wing heavenly dragon angel,
Speaker 1: and when it takes a physical form in the physical Earth,
Speaker 1: it takes a dragon form. And we see that whether
Speaker 1: or not it's with the Euraus gods throughout the Middle East.
Speaker 1: And what is Araus god, well, that's a common term
Speaker 1: for the Canaanite gods like Baal son of l both
Speaker 1: are Eureus gods, flying wing serpent gods. Goes right through
Speaker 1: to the to Egypt with Osiris and the associated pantheon
Speaker 1: there as Euraus gods. I won't give the mother goddess there,
Speaker 1: so we don't take get taken down for talking about
Speaker 1: a terrorist organization. That's name the same. We have to
Speaker 1: be careful there. And so these are serpentine gods and
Speaker 1: they produce serpentine kings as they're described in ancient history.
Speaker 1: And so when you talk about a dragon legacy or
Speaker 1: a dragon court, they take their genealogies back to a
Speaker 1: seraphim angel in that branch of one of the celestial
Speaker 1: Mafia godfathers. So we'll see these dragon angels as quetzcodal
Speaker 1: and associated names of the plumed and feathered serpent with
Speaker 1: the Keisha. Maya will have that. In Greece where you
Speaker 1: have Zeus as a rais god as well and his
Speaker 1: father Cronos, you will have that as on Leo and
Speaker 1: Ankey and the parent gods out of the Sumerian pantheon,
Speaker 1: the dragon creator gods in China which produced offspring as well,
Speaker 1: called the Sons of Heaven. Again all the same language
Speaker 1: that's used all around the world for the same group
Speaker 1: of gods. And this is a superior race that is
Speaker 1: going to be provided the divine rate to rule, to
Speaker 1: rule over the mundane and inferior humans. And so they
Speaker 1: create this four class system where they populate the top
Speaker 1: two classes and the humans populate the bottom two classes.
Speaker 1: If you're successful as a human, you will become a
Speaker 1: blacksmith or a tailor, some manual entrepreneurial but low level position,
Speaker 1: and or the fourth class will be slave class, working class,
Speaker 1: and ritual sacrifice class, depending how far back you go
Speaker 1: into history in which version of the pantheon, and that
Speaker 1: the top two classes populate the ruling class with the
Speaker 1: kings and the gods the royals, as they take their
Speaker 1: lineage back to a specific raphaeme in nepheline patriarch and
Speaker 1: when they talk about in their connecting to Zeus, that
Speaker 1: would be what they call the kreda gens are k
Speaker 1: rt as it's in the original Semitic and Urit texts
Speaker 1: for crete, because Zeus spent a lot of time on crete,
Speaker 1: and Zeus produced through elk many Hercules, who created the
Speaker 1: Herculeitean bloodline that we would know as the Guiges Kings
Speaker 1: and the guys King, which is the.
Speaker 3: Player he had too a lot of people look at
Speaker 3: you know, he was from a set of twins and
Speaker 3: his brother was a normal human.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, exactly. And so this imagery is it just
Speaker 1: sort of permeates our world today. We don't know why.
Speaker 1: And they call themselves the Dragon Court in the House
Speaker 1: of Dragon, and there's various lines of these dragons as
Speaker 1: they go back to these specific giant patriarchs and celestial
Speaker 1: mafia godfathers. So this history that they have is a
Speaker 1: weaving of our history into their history read to accomplish
Speaker 1: their goal and within polytheism. You have good versus evil
Speaker 1: as well versus the macro Satan versus God. But inside
Speaker 1: you have good witches and evil witches. You have white
Speaker 1: magic and black magic. You have white hats and black hats.
Speaker 1: As we might hear the terminology today, you have good
Speaker 1: giants evil giants. You have good kings evil kings. Understand,
Speaker 1: they all go back to the same pantheon, they just
Speaker 1: have a different route to the same destiny. Yeah, And
Speaker 1: so as a royal, that's kings of God rexdais is
Speaker 1: the Latin term for it, and roy is old French
Speaker 1: roy and goes back to the Latin regal and regalis
Speaker 1: for a king and a ruler, and back to the
Speaker 1: language of the giants and the pie or proto Indo
Speaker 1: European into your Indo area. And it's also known as
Speaker 1: for reg for a ruler. And most of the words
Speaker 1: that we have that are going to describe to oriles
Speaker 1: is going to go back to that original language of
Speaker 1: the giants. So it's it's it's important to understand how
Speaker 1: they overlay all of their imagery on us about that.
Speaker 1: So I think when we when we look at that passage,
Speaker 1: it is very, very enlightening in just so many ways
Speaker 1: in terms of what it sets down and that they
Speaker 1: as the superior demigod race, they would actually be better
Speaker 1: called than the term they use today. But understand with
Speaker 1: the fertility issue that they had in the time of
Speaker 1: the postal Lvian giants with the raphaem they were not
Speaker 1: able to produce it enough females. I don't have time
Speaker 1: to go into all of that detail. But they had
Speaker 1: to intermarry with humans, so now they become a hybrid
Speaker 1: giant and human and producing smaller juid giants, and as
Speaker 1: have to continue to intermarry, they lose most of their features.
Speaker 3: Are you a hunter, a hiker, or just an outdoor enthusiast, Well,
Speaker 3: if you are, you know that good quality gear is
Speaker 3: hard to come by, and find an All American maid
Speaker 3: is like finding big Foot in the woods, hence the
Speaker 3: name of Squat Survival Gear. Head on over to Squatch
Speaker 3: survival gear dot com use the code p LP ten
Speaker 3: for ten percent off store wide. With the price of
Speaker 3: eggs and bread slowly approaching a day's wages, it's more
Speaker 3: important than ever than to secure the value of your dollar.
Speaker 3: One thing that has remained steady is gold. And silver
Speaker 3: throughout the ages. Back in Roman times, a piece of
Speaker 3: gold would get you a toga that's the equivalent of
Speaker 3: three thousand dollars today. That still remains true to this day.
Speaker 3: For a full suit shoes tie, you're looking at about
Speaker 3: three thousand dollars because gold and silver holds its value.
Speaker 3: So if you're tired of watching the value of your
Speaker 3: dollar go down every single day, it's time to get
Speaker 3: off your hands.
Speaker 2: And make a move.
Speaker 3: Recently teamed with Cornerstone Asset Metals, reach out to those
Speaker 3: guys for all of your financial needs. It's time to
Speaker 3: trade in that forever devaluing dollar into hard assets that
Speaker 3: you can hold like gold and silver. And check the
Speaker 3: link down in the description or the number on the
Speaker 3: screen the night tell them, Doc Branson.
Speaker 1: The term that they use for themselves today are elites, right,
Speaker 1: And that is a term that is meaning a group
Speaker 1: or a class of people having the greatest power and
Speaker 1: influence within a society because of their wealth and privilege.
Speaker 1: And it comes from the group of people who, by
Speaker 1: virtue of position, education, genealogy, exercise power and influence as
Speaker 1: the ruling elite. And it goes back to the Middle
Speaker 1: English as chosen person, chosen one as in Messiah type
Speaker 1: of people or Israel type of people, as the chosen
Speaker 1: ones or the elect from French elite and old French
Speaker 1: as is elite and a leer meaning choice or selected
Speaker 1: or chosen out and Latin ela guerre meaning choose elect
Speaker 1: an election. And so they look at themselves as the
Speaker 1: chosen ones, and more importantly as an l eight with
Speaker 1: that hybrid bloodline. But in the beginning they would look
Speaker 1: at themselves as a leam, as the God, as the
Speaker 1: god ones or the physically human god ones, and we
Speaker 1: see that translated as nephaline from naphaline as fallen ones
Speaker 1: and fallen ones from God as you take that into nephilin.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and you had mentioned it. I just wanted to
Speaker 3: touch on it. But the beginning of that book Nicholas
Speaker 3: de Vere really caught my attention when I was listening
Speaker 3: to it. He was basically criticizing New Age people and
Speaker 3: witches and people that say they're witches and people that
Speaker 3: say their warlocks and things like that, and he said that,
Speaker 3: he said, yeah, you could do all the magic spells perfect,
Speaker 3: you could have the you know, the perfect grimoires and
Speaker 3: doing everything just right, he said, But it's never going
Speaker 3: to work. He said. Those people are not witches, they're
Speaker 3: not warlocks, he said, they're not vampires. All these people,
Speaker 3: he said, are just playing cosplay. He said. They might
Speaker 3: actually believe they are, he said, And do the spells,
Speaker 3: do all the things, he said, but they're not accomplishing
Speaker 3: the same things he said that the ancients were. He said,
Speaker 3: because he said, it doesn't come down to knowledge, he said,
Speaker 3: it comes down to blood. It's in the blood. The bloodline.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the blood line and the high level of knowledge
Speaker 1: that these low level that they consider mundane Polytheius have.
Speaker 1: So there's different hierarchies, and you're either an adept end
Speaker 1: of the bloodline or you're not. And it's as simple
Speaker 1: as that. And the puerier bloodline and the higher you're
Speaker 1: allowed to go into those mysteries. And there's an interesting
Speaker 1: passage that's in Deuteronomy that connects a lot of this
Speaker 1: imagery and source. And I always like to take things
Speaker 1: back as much as I can, sort of biblically, And
Speaker 1: so when we look at what they believe, they as
Speaker 1: in the royals and the Polytheis and the gnostics is,
Speaker 1: they look at Gomorrah as the location where the giants
Speaker 1: first began before the flood, and after the flood they're
Speaker 1: replanted at Sodom. So yes, you have Harem Anathema both
Speaker 1: taken on Mount Hermon, likely before and again after the flood,
Speaker 1: if there's a second incursion, and I think there is.
Speaker 1: But they have the same two cities as part of
Speaker 1: that pentapolies of the five cities of the plane that's
Speaker 1: going to be destroyed by fire, that has a unique
Speaker 1: special story and meaning to it in the Old Testament.
Speaker 1: So here's what Deuteronomy sort of says about this imagery
Speaker 1: and Sodom, and so it's talking about the fruitful vines, lineages,
Speaker 1: and grapes of Sodom and Gomorrah, and they're described as
Speaker 1: the grapes of gall and the wine and the poison
Speaker 1: of dragons and the cruel venom of asss. I don't
Speaker 1: believe that language is there coincidentally for those two cities,
Speaker 1: not only for the sins, but the level of the
Speaker 1: sins of where the creation of the giants is likely
Speaker 1: to have happened, at least from a polytheist perspective, And
Speaker 1: we can get there biblically too. But that's a different
Speaker 1: rabbit hole and gall or rash is a poison that
Speaker 1: it's extracted from plants like hemlock or poppies, and poppies
Speaker 1: are very much part of ritual antidiluvian rituals of polytheism
Speaker 1: and or a venom from a snow and all of
Speaker 1: which are poisonous to humans. So like they are a
Speaker 1: vine that's poisonous to humans. And there are a branch
Speaker 1: of the terrible Ones as they're talked about in Ezekiel
Speaker 1: thirty two in Isaiah twenty five, and so the wine
Speaker 1: thereof is the poison of the dragons and the genealogical
Speaker 1: vine and the branches from Sodom and Gomorrah who rule
Speaker 1: this world, and they're the Postzulian source for the House
Speaker 1: of Dragon and the House of the Fairies, which is
Speaker 1: the matriarchal allegory versus the patriarchal with the dragon allegory,
Speaker 1: and Devera will talk a lot about that fairy gens
Speaker 1: as well, and that goes back to starting new dynasties
Speaker 1: with females because they have this fertility issue and lack
Speaker 1: of female so they are selected because they're rare and
Speaker 1: they would start branches off for new dynasties off of
Speaker 1: sort of the parent dynasty of the seventy Nations, and
Speaker 1: so the genealogical vine of Sodom and Gomorrow. They rule
Speaker 1: this world as the post Deluvian House of Dragon that
Speaker 1: imposes their religions, their world view, their history, and Babylonian
Speaker 1: religion throughout. The Beast empires on humans, and so he's
Speaker 1: giving you their source and their authority and their credibility
Speaker 1: for their position to be superior humans to the mundane humans,
Speaker 1: and why they should be their rulers.
Speaker 3: Yeah, one thing too, I found very interesting speaking on
Speaker 3: the blood. You know, we have countless laws and regulations
Speaker 3: you know throughout the Torah about condemning the drinking of blood,
Speaker 3: and the Amalekots they were known sorcerers and drank the
Speaker 3: blood and all this stuff. Well, I found it fascinating
Speaker 3: that Nicholas talks about how Hollywood has blew these things
Speaker 3: up out of proportion and fantasized them so much that
Speaker 3: when people hear the words like witches, vampires, you know,
Speaker 3: all these different things elves that we think of the
Speaker 3: Hollywood version, and that's totally not what they're talking about
Speaker 3: in this book in these ancient legends and writings. But
Speaker 3: he also said that one thing that they throw you
Speaker 3: partial truths or hints of the truth. He said, because
Speaker 3: when you look at the vampire movies, to convert another vampire,
Speaker 3: they have to consume their blood. So the vampire has
Speaker 3: to give its blood to the normal person and it
Speaker 3: transmutates them and turns them into this vampire. But he
Speaker 3: said that there was covenants made, and he said, like
Speaker 3: you had mentioned, when they had trouble breeding and they
Speaker 3: couldn't produce airs, that they would take peace and basically
Speaker 3: like adopt them and they would do these rituals and
Speaker 3: have them drink their blood. That way, their blood was
Speaker 3: inside of them and they were at least part of
Speaker 3: the dragon. And he talked about even some science behind
Speaker 3: it that so much blood, as drunk it can actually
Speaker 3: bind to you and actually change your DNA structure.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I don't know whether that's possible or not,
Speaker 1: but they believe it. And it doesn't really matter whether
Speaker 1: or not we always believe what they believe. It's that
Speaker 1: they believe it and what they do with that belief
Speaker 1: system that's important. And again biblically, as you mentioned, we're
Speaker 1: told not to drink blood. And you know the big
Speaker 1: three things that are there in the New Covenant that
Speaker 1: James bound were to dealing of the drinking of blood
Speaker 1: and the sacrificing of idols and sexual sins, all of
Speaker 1: which were part of the Giant culture, and that they
Speaker 1: used to drink these blood the blood for a number
Speaker 1: of reasons. One of the ones is they would pass
Speaker 1: down to us is that they are usurping control over
Speaker 1: those lower level beings of drinking their blood. So as
Speaker 1: you see it sort of allegorized in Dracula, they become
Speaker 1: like servants of Dracula, right, So it's part of that,
Speaker 1: you know, authority of a hierarchy as well, and so
Speaker 1: it's used to increase in their belief system people that
Speaker 1: they can directly control and probably communicate within the old
Speaker 1: sort of system telepathically. They also drank blood to extend
Speaker 1: their lives after their lives were limited in Genesis sixty
Speaker 1: three to one hundred and twenty years in the physical body.
Speaker 1: Not the counterfeited spirit wouldn't die, but the body would die. Right.
Speaker 1: So when they bring like a vampire back to life
Speaker 1: in Dracula, that's a new Oikterian or a revived Orchitarian,
Speaker 1: and that original demonic spirit that is not in the
Speaker 1: pit prison probably didn't create enough evil to go there,
Speaker 1: but is wandering the earth as devils as we understand it,
Speaker 1: unclean spirits and evil spirits that Jesus is dealing with.
Speaker 1: That word devil isn't diabolos for satan. It's dam on,
Speaker 1: the root word for demon, and so that demonic spirit
Speaker 1: would go back into it in that sort of allegorical lore.
Speaker 1: I don't believe they have the ability to restore bodies,
Speaker 1: but that's an imagery that they're using there, and I'm
Speaker 1: going to come back to that in just a second.
Speaker 1: And just to finish off with the blood, is that
Speaker 1: the blood is designed to extend their life and to
Speaker 1: give them larger cognitive abilities. And when they drink the
Speaker 1: blood of others, they gain their life blood and control
Speaker 1: over them. And we see that in the fairy side
Speaker 1: as well. I'm talking about the dragon sight here. Let's
Speaker 1: say with the quickening that is shown in the Highlander movies,
Speaker 1: where they get this lightning spirit that they swallow up
Speaker 1: over humans that makes them stronger in what they call
Speaker 1: a quickening, just as Jesus was in the quickening in
Speaker 1: the grave as in spirit and then rose from the
Speaker 1: grave again. Right, So they again they use that type
Speaker 1: of imagery and everything they do. And we can talk
Speaker 1: about how they get to the fairy allegory later, if
Speaker 1: you like, through the dukes of edom, but just to
Speaker 1: let people understand, there's two allegories in play, a matriarchal
Speaker 1: allegory and a patriarchal allegory through the bloodliness as well.
Speaker 1: And so when we look at increasing their cognitive ability,
Speaker 1: that means they have the ability to understand more at
Speaker 1: a level that the mundane human can't. So that's what
Speaker 1: they're getting at with these lower level polytheist cults like
Speaker 1: New Age, they're a branch of, but they consider them
Speaker 1: as bad as humans, you know, who are Christians, because
Speaker 1: they don't have all the knowledge, they don't have the bloodlines.
Speaker 1: They're just almost camouflage for them to hide behind. And
Speaker 1: so Dracula becomes a allegory for vampires, and you have
Speaker 1: to get into the occult to understand the meanings that
Speaker 1: they overlay. But Dracula is means son of a dragon,
Speaker 1: and it's rooted in the Greek word Draconte and Draconta
Speaker 1: for a watcher angel or a watcher god or a
Speaker 1: dragon seraphim god in this case, and that Glad the
Speaker 1: Impaler takes his genealogy back to the Egathy tribe of
Speaker 1: Scythia that was founded by Hercules, that is the son
Speaker 1: of Zeus and elk Many, which is part of that
Speaker 1: creditgends that we talked about, and Prince Charles is on
Speaker 1: record of saying he takes his genealogies back to Vlad
Speaker 1: the Impaler that Dracula is based on. I'm Glad the
Speaker 1: Paler was a classic red haired, hazel eyed paleskin sensitive
Speaker 1: to light royal who was educated at a mystery school
Speaker 1: in Vienna, and so he is a bloodline that's pure
Speaker 1: and used as the allegory to tell a story that
Speaker 1: only the people in the cult, you know the true
Speaker 1: meanings to the narratives, but that's their style. They tell
Speaker 1: they're great storytellers, and then they can hide everything in
Speaker 1: plain sight. So it's important to understand that in the
Speaker 1: hierarchy of their doctrines, the lower level that they would
Speaker 1: consider mundane don't get the full meaning, and in fact
Speaker 1: they're given as much bad misinformation as they give to Christians.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and one thing I too, I found fast thing
Speaker 3: while reading the book, and I made connections through other
Speaker 3: books that I had read. But I had noticed that
Speaker 3: almost every single culture has a group of people that
Speaker 3: they describe as the Shining Ones. And when you go
Speaker 3: back to Genesis, you know in the Hebrew that word serpent,
Speaker 3: you know, isn't the cash and yat can mean serpent,
Speaker 3: but it also mean the shining one. I mean, you
Speaker 3: find it in Egypt, you find in South America, you
Speaker 3: find it in China, I mean everywhere. And I think
Speaker 3: it was the what was it, the Oven Race. They
Speaker 3: were even described as the Shining Ones. And what is
Speaker 3: his name, dag on It. I can't remember his name
Speaker 3: out slipping me. But there's an anthropologist that's really kind
Speaker 3: of broke into this too and done a deep nive,
Speaker 3: and he found correlations with the blonde hair and red
Speaker 3: hair and blue eyed people, and they're finding them everywhere
Speaker 3: in depictions and paintings and stone. And he draws it
Speaker 3: back to this dragon court. Even de Verir talks about it,
Speaker 3: that it was predominantly red hair, blonde hair, and blue
Speaker 3: eyed people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and understand there's also the dark haired giants as well,
Speaker 1: probably coming from the Tarubum watchers, which is another strain
Speaker 1: of giants. And the reason why I say that is
Speaker 1: when you're seeing depictions of Anu Naki in a human face,
Speaker 1: they have dark hair, these bushy beards. Right, you also
Speaker 1: see the same imagery with the same rituals with these
Speaker 1: bird faced or eagle faced ones around this sort of
Speaker 1: tree or technology that's very common. Another face they could
Speaker 1: they would take a truban would take one face, and
Speaker 1: they had a face of a human, a face of
Speaker 1: an eagle, a face of a bull or an ox
Speaker 1: i think bull and a lion. And so when they're
Speaker 1: depicted of as carabs or sphinxes, they would have one
Speaker 1: of those faces. And if they produced, they would produce
Speaker 1: giants that would just like them, would look just like them.
Speaker 1: Just as the seraphim produced the blonde haired and red
Speaker 1: haired varieties, these ones produced the dark haired ones like
Speaker 1: Gilgamesh and as Nimrod is also projected as looking at
Speaker 1: and conflated with and so that imagery is constant throughout
Speaker 1: the Syrian kings and the Aryans, and so it's a
Speaker 1: special sort of race. But what Tavera is talking about
Speaker 1: and whether or not the other race had it or
Speaker 1: not is is they had this ability to communicate telepathically
Speaker 1: as in a hive mind at one point in time,
Speaker 1: and they called themselves the Shining Ones and the Mesopotamian
Speaker 1: giants aka the Olamim or Elam as it's uh was
Speaker 1: adopted by the Semites as the name or the Cadmanime
Speaker 1: or the Kenizeme or the kenem and and how many
Speaker 1: other giants were part of the Indo Aryan dark haired groups.
Speaker 1: They were also known as the Shining Ones. And so
Speaker 1: we understand this as different than an opalescent being as
Speaker 1: a spirit angel before they took a form. So there's
Speaker 1: an opalescence that's described in their belief system. And even
Speaker 1: when a god took a physical form, it was still
Speaker 1: a brilliance beyond what the giants had. And we get
Speaker 1: those descriptions in the Bible for angels when they become
Speaker 1: in a physical form, as in the Book of Daniel
Speaker 1: and elsewhere. So you have a lower degraded form because
Speaker 1: the demigods aren't fully angelic, right, they are part human
Speaker 1: as part of that first hybrid race, and so they
Speaker 1: did have a shining capability but not to the same
Speaker 1: brilliance and level. And typically the understanding comes as the
Speaker 1: shining ones through their eyes glowing, and that they would
Speaker 1: and maybe even part of their head glowing, and those
Speaker 1: that shining would light up a complete room. So if
Speaker 1: you look at one of the allegories that they use
Speaker 1: in entertainment with the gay Ould when they speak, their
Speaker 1: eyes light up in the Stargate series and again low level,
Speaker 1: but you sort of get where they're going with it.
Speaker 1: So now if you look at and I'll use this
Speaker 1: one as a dragon example, because he's considered one of
Speaker 1: the key dragon kings, not only by the d vere family,
Speaker 1: and the original Angeir who produced the Anjou, by the way,
Speaker 1: is a junior offshoot of those of those lines. Acinatin
Speaker 1: is considered one of the core key part of the
Speaker 1: Tuatha de Denan Scythian red haired blonde hair type of giants,
Speaker 1: as one of those key dragon dynasties. And what's interesting
Speaker 1: about and Ocn if you look at one of his statues,
Speaker 1: he has this long protruding chin, high cheekbones, elongated serpentine skull.
Speaker 1: You look serpentine when you look at him, and these
Speaker 1: large eyes that were kind of wrap around, and it
Speaker 1: was those eyes that were of a completely different nature
Speaker 1: that they had that would light up that room. From
Speaker 1: where they get the name the shining ones after you know,
Speaker 1: a partial gift passed on through d n A once
Speaker 1: those ain't those watchers that physical form, and again you
Speaker 1: have that pharaoh as they will adopt in adapt into
Speaker 1: their fairy allegory in the aniou de Fair family fair fairy,
Speaker 1: they put that as part of one of their scion bloodlines,
Speaker 1: going into into their genealogical background. And so it's important
Speaker 1: to understand that these these giants had voices that would
Speaker 1: bellow like the as described in the Atlantean cases with Atlas,
Speaker 1: like from you know, the gods or the volcanoes from
Speaker 1: the earth. Their voices were that strong and they were
Speaker 1: terrifying to the site with their genealogical look in this
Speaker 1: case a serpentine look, these glowing eyes, these huge skins,
Speaker 1: their sizes, their voices, they were an absolute attack on
Speaker 1: the senses. And they were called beautiful or fair, which
Speaker 1: is the other part of the allegory for their name
Speaker 1: that you see fair used in fairy tales for good
Speaker 1: looking females. But even the males would be called fair.
Speaker 1: We even see that terminoli you used within the Bible,
Speaker 1: as it's translated from their original Hebrew, and again I
Speaker 1: think that's part of how they usurp the Bible.
Speaker 3: So like you ever sit around a fire and think
Speaker 3: if Bigfoot were a hat, what would it be? Well
Speaker 3: I found it. It's from a brand called soul Squatch.
Speaker 3: This isn't your typical tourist shop bigfoot merch, No basic
Speaker 3: silhouettes slapped on and called a day. This is a
Speaker 3: Squatch approved gear, rugged, intentional, and made for folks who
Speaker 3: still believe that there's mystery in the woods. They've got
Speaker 3: leather patches, PBC patches, embroidery, even a fresh take on
Speaker 3: the classic footprint, and everything's built to hand, a real trail.
Speaker 3: Doy and britty creating this brand from real obsession, real
Speaker 3: hikes and a real love for the legend. Head over
Speaker 3: to the soul Squatch dot com and gear up with
Speaker 3: the rest of the fellow believers, because legends don't die,
Speaker 3: they evolve.
Speaker 1: The son of David is called Fair Absalom and was
Speaker 1: very beautiful in that sort of handsome sort of looking.
Speaker 1: You wonder like, why would they be using that sort
Speaker 1: of term with Absalom, son of David.
Speaker 3: Well, he was the league son to try to rebel
Speaker 3: Agency's father.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he is, and there's a genealogical basis for that.
Speaker 1: So and I cover off who the the Gesherim are
Speaker 1: in the Maka theme in book two. These are giants
Speaker 1: of the Mount Herman region. So when David makes a
Speaker 1: deal with the nations he didn't fight in the Syrian War,
Speaker 1: these are the other nations around Mount Herman, and King
Speaker 1: Talmai of gesher a giant who's got a patronymical king
Speaker 1: title going back to Talmai of the Anachem, who are
Speaker 1: blonde haired giants as they're recorded in history and reliefs
Speaker 1: from the Hebron area that are there in the time
Speaker 1: of the Judges and in the time of the Exodus.
Speaker 1: There's Talmai Shashai and Ahi Men. Well, he's got this
Speaker 1: patronymic genealogical title passed down to him as a king
Speaker 1: as well. And his wife has another patronymic name but
Speaker 1: also used matronymically for females as which is Maka from
Speaker 1: the House of Maka and the Maka theme that are
Speaker 1: also located up there. And so she has this patronymic
Speaker 1: royale queen title, and it is Maca that is going
Speaker 1: to marry David to produce Epsilon. So after being exiled
Speaker 1: for taking revenge for one of his sisters, he goes
Speaker 1: back to Gesher under Talmai and then comes back to
Speaker 1: Hebron to start a civil war. So you have a
Speaker 1: hybrid giant who is fair and beautiful with the genealogical
Speaker 1: basises that we have within the Bible, that's trying to
Speaker 1: overtake King David's genealogical bloodline and dynasty that's eventually going
Speaker 1: to produce Jesus. And it's an attempt to put their
Speaker 1: dragon ennobled blood line in there to usurp the blessings
Speaker 1: of the of the Covenant, of the Holy Covenant, the
Speaker 1: inheritance of the Holy Covenant, and the magianic blood line.
Speaker 1: Mm hmmm.
Speaker 3: And people missed Tamar. You know that you have the
Speaker 3: seed war in the story of Tamar if you digged
Speaker 3: into the genealogies too, because Judah, just like Esau, marries
Speaker 3: a Canaanite woman and has all these you know, Canaanite children.
Speaker 3: Of course, you know that we're commanded not to to
Speaker 3: intermarry with the Canaanites because they were that wicked branch
Speaker 3: that you had mentioned earlier. And a lot of people
Speaker 3: look at that story and they say, oh, well, the
Speaker 3: first son that married Tamar, he refused to sleep with
Speaker 3: her and procreate with us, so God killed him. And
Speaker 3: then the second son they went to the second son
Speaker 3: of Judah because that was the custom, and it said
Speaker 3: that he spilled his seed because he didn't want to
Speaker 3: procreate with her. And then the third one was so young,
Speaker 3: he was too young to marry. So Judah promises Tamar
Speaker 3: that when he comes to age that the youngest will
Speaker 3: marry her. But really I think it was because Judah's
Speaker 3: wife was a Canaanite and had hatred and discord for Tamar,
Speaker 3: and so God, honestly, God was protecting that bloodline because
Speaker 3: through Tamar was that good line that the Messiah would come.
Speaker 3: So ultimately, that's why a lot of people look at
Speaker 3: that and say, well, you know she pretended to be
Speaker 3: a prostitute and slept with her father in law. Well
Speaker 3: that was because it was protecting that bloodline of the
Speaker 3: Messiah and keeping it pure because Judah, you know, was
Speaker 3: of the good branch, so to speak.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, So you have to read and you don't
Speaker 1: get the contacts unless you get into all of the
Speaker 1: details of the Old Testament. And with these genealogies, if
Speaker 1: you don't know that, you don't know why there's this
Speaker 1: inter relationship that keeps sort of coming downstream in the
Speaker 1: Old Testament. And even though those genealogies can monotonous and boring,
Speaker 1: once you understand the genealogies that are listed in the
Speaker 1: Old Testament, things start to make some sense. So, yes,
Speaker 1: we need to be aware of this. And you know
Speaker 1: the de vere as I said, they produced the Anjou
Speaker 1: and they believe that they are the descendants of the
Speaker 1: royal Scythians tu Authaddnan the tribes of d Tanu at
Speaker 1: Mount Herman that are subject to the Council of the
Speaker 1: Gods that the Balim are ruling over after the flood
Speaker 1: and l and that council before the flood. And so
Speaker 1: D'tanu is a transliteration of Tuautha do Denan or Tuatha
Speaker 1: Danu as they would take some of those different transliterations back,
Speaker 1: and that these are the Elvin ones of the Ferry
Speaker 1: branch of the matriarchal branch. When you see Elvin now
Speaker 1: in this to authordodd Nan as a dragon bloodline. When
Speaker 1: they say Elvin, that is the fairy allegory. That's the
Speaker 1: matriarchal aspect that they also track because of the rarity
Speaker 1: of the females and the purity therefore of the dynasties
Speaker 1: that they started. And so they were also the lords
Speaker 1: of Anew and they looked at themselves as part of
Speaker 1: the pick version of the too author Doo and Nan.
Speaker 1: So in the settlements of Great Britain, you have to
Speaker 1: author Didnan in Ireland and in Wales, and the Picts
Speaker 1: are the ones that seemingly are a different bit from
Speaker 1: a different migration of the same people out of Scythia,
Speaker 1: but to the northern region, just as you have the
Speaker 1: Norse and more blonde haired variety and blue eyed with
Speaker 1: the Vikings are the same to author Denanne that went
Speaker 1: up the Danube River, you know, into Germany, into Russia,
Speaker 1: into Ukraine, into Norway and stuff. And so the angu
Speaker 1: believe that they were born of Anu of the Sumerian pantheon,
Speaker 1: as they take that back as their main source. There's
Speaker 1: ennobled One bloodlines that are grafted in that they show
Speaker 1: within their heraldic coat of arms, and so they believe
Speaker 1: that originally they were called the gentry. And people don't
Speaker 1: really they've heard of that term. They don't really know
Speaker 1: exactly what it's used, but it's an elite term that's
Speaker 1: used for elite groups and stuff, which should be no surprise.
Speaker 1: But a gentry is defined as a most notable tribe
Speaker 1: and a race of luminous beings shining ones, right and yeah,
Speaker 1: And it's part of the fairy culture. And the two
Speaker 1: Autho did and the two author were the fair folk
Speaker 1: as well, and the fairy folk and the kings were
Speaker 1: dragons pen dragons, just as King Arthur was a too
Speaker 1: Autha Dinan and son of Uther Pendragon, and Guinevere was
Speaker 1: a fairy queen from the two Autha to Dinan as well.
Speaker 1: So understand how these work interchangeably, and that the people
Speaker 1: of the occult of the adapt level and the bloodlines,
Speaker 1: they understand how those terms and allegories work back and forth.
Speaker 1: And gentry as it applies to the Elven bloodline in
Speaker 1: the occult royal circles, it derives from Gens, just as
Speaker 1: Albigens is another gens that is part of the Norse
Speaker 1: gens and more from the Odin bloodline through the Rolo
Speaker 1: family that also intermarries with some of the Ange bloodlines
Speaker 1: as well. LB means pale, white, hoary, everything associated with
Speaker 1: something that the giants were associated and gens and this
Speaker 1: is a Latin albigens is a Latin word. Gens goes
Speaker 1: back to a specific single patriarch. So again understand that
Speaker 1: when we talk about a Julia gens or creditgens or
Speaker 1: an albigens, it goes back to specific nephilum or raffine
Speaker 1: patriarchs and to specific Angels as the original male patriarch
Speaker 1: or a female patriarch. And that the gens is understood
Speaker 1: of of the blood genealogical of the blood, the gene
Speaker 1: that produces a specific royal blood typically as we would
Speaker 1: understand as the negative blood within the royals. And with that,
Speaker 1: people let say that they've been had genetic changes through
Speaker 1: sexual experimentation with aliens, right, they tend to have more
Speaker 1: of this rh negative blood. That's a different rabbit hole,
Speaker 1: and that the bloodline and the word play works into
Speaker 1: the genealogical tree, right that they have. That's part of
Speaker 1: the two thalamic tree allegories. They have one for the
Speaker 1: family tree, one for their hierarchy of organizations, and LBGNS
Speaker 1: is understood in as associated with Elvin is understood as
Speaker 1: noble white elves. So when we look at the Lord
Speaker 1: of the Rings, these are taller than the hobbits. These
Speaker 1: are not the little ones. These are the giants, as
Speaker 1: they are allegorized. It's the dark elves that are the
Speaker 1: small ones. The white elves are the Shay people. S
Speaker 1: I d h E. Saday has got a one hundred
Speaker 1: different pronunciations to it. You can see a painting of
Speaker 1: the writers of the Seday or the Shay or the
Speaker 1: seed or the she, and there's just like I said,
Speaker 1: there's one hundred different variations of it. And it's this
Speaker 1: blonde hair, pale skin, blue eyed ones with a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of dragon imagery in it, the very very famous painting,
Speaker 1: and it just sort of encapsulates what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: And so this is noble white elves. Understanding. Indo Aryans
Speaker 1: that I mentioned earlier is understood as it's defined coming
Speaker 1: out of the original Indo Aryan language as the noble ones,
Speaker 1: the noble people. So nobel is a description of their
Speaker 1: superior nature, because these are these are the giants, and
Speaker 1: so the white elves are of the fairy kind, akin
Speaker 1: to the larger giant and the fairy shay or the
Speaker 1: Tuatha de denand as we see that come downstream through
Speaker 1: the fairy legacy and combining that with fairy tale and
Speaker 1: the two author do it and end. And so the
Speaker 1: the Angeu, who are a junior offshoot of the de
Speaker 1: vere of a junior offshoot of the ange Jer. And
Speaker 1: then these genealogies on their records that go back into history.
Speaker 1: These are these are the ones that are taking over
Speaker 1: uh in terms of the French thrones, and they'll get
Speaker 1: control for a while of the English thrones, and they
Speaker 1: get control of the Italian throne. There's several different branches
Speaker 1: of of the Angou, and they all claim the same
Speaker 1: type of lineage and they track their genealogies, you know,
Speaker 1: through the various inner marriage and back to the same
Speaker 1: sort of common sources.
Speaker 3: M and with the like the Catholic Church devere mentions
Speaker 3: this not I wanted to get your opinion on it
Speaker 3: because I found I never heard it before, and so
Speaker 3: it was kind of outlanding to me. But like I said,
Speaker 3: I've just not really looked that far into it. That's
Speaker 3: the first time i'd read anything like that. But they
Speaker 3: Nicholas was basically saying, and this guy we're talking about,
Speaker 3: you know, he is from these bloodlines, so you're getting
Speaker 3: like some behind the scenes stuff from him. But he
Speaker 3: said that basically, if I understood it correctly, that the
Speaker 3: Dragon bloodlines even had control of like the Catholic Church
Speaker 3: in the religious side, and that's why you see in
Speaker 3: the Vatican all this dragon imagery, and that basically, at
Speaker 3: Constantine's death, the mud bloods, if that's what you want
Speaker 3: to call it, you know, the ormies, and he referred
Speaker 3: to him, I think as tinkers. He said they were
Speaker 3: the merchants and the bankers and you know, the traders.
Speaker 3: And he said that they had weaseled in to Constantine's
Speaker 3: court and gave a fake what do you call it, betrothal,
Speaker 3: because they said that at Constantine's death bet he handed
Speaker 3: over the reins and gave everything to the church, the
Speaker 3: Roman Catholic Church, and made them like the ultimate power.
Speaker 3: But it was the tinkers that inserted themselves and tried
Speaker 3: to take over and take it from the dragon courts.
Speaker 3: And now that's what it's saying. That he's saying the
Speaker 3: world that it's in such a mess right now because
Speaker 3: the rightful rulers, the dragon courts, have lost a lot
Speaker 3: of power, and they've deluded their power so much, and
Speaker 3: that these tinkers have tooken over. And now that's why
Speaker 3: greed rules, because they are the merchants, they're the traders,
Speaker 3: they're the bankers and all this stuff. I didn't know
Speaker 3: if you had heard of that, or what was your
Speaker 3: thoughts on that if you had.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's there's a sort of a mainstream there that
Speaker 1: makes makes some sense. And so I'll go back to
Speaker 1: their hierarchy, the polytheist hierarchy, you know, created by the
Speaker 1: original Anochian mysticism and before the flood. It's the same
Speaker 1: religion as the Atlantean religion, same as Zoroastrianism that crosses
Speaker 1: the flood and the kings. Their hierarchy is to have
Speaker 1: a giant king with authority to rule in each of
Speaker 1: the seventy nations, both before and after the flood. And
Speaker 1: as David Roll research and examined that when Enoch brought
Speaker 1: down the giants from Mount Herman with their divine authority,
Speaker 1: because that's where they would receive the authority, whether it's
Speaker 1: Nippur or at the Ballein Council, at the Dato Titano Assembly.
Speaker 1: That's all at Mount Herman, So there might be other
Speaker 1: mountains around the world that they would also do it.
Speaker 1: Within the seven major mountains of Polytheism, there's a place
Speaker 1: where they're going to receive their authority, and they're also
Speaker 1: assigned a bloodline giant priest for the religion. And so
Speaker 1: when this religion crosses the flood, that whole organizational structure
Speaker 1: with the giants, and that religion crosses the flood that
Speaker 1: we would understand as the Babel religion that Nimrod imposes,
Speaker 1: and that's the mother religion of the old religion starting
Speaker 1: at Babel at people as they go to live amongst
Speaker 1: the giants, as the Aboriginals, are going to take that
Speaker 1: religion and plus the original religion that the giants were
Speaker 1: worshipping and becomes sort of the same religion. And these
Speaker 1: are the daughters of Babylon, as we understand that term
Speaker 1: for the daughters of the religion that comes down through
Speaker 1: the Beast empires. They all have the same Babylonian type
Speaker 1: of religion. It's a bit vernacular whether or not it's
Speaker 1: in Rome, or it's in Greece, or it's in Persia
Speaker 1: or it's in Egypt, but it's that same sort of religion,
Speaker 1: bloodline religion that's assigned. So we would see that hidden
Speaker 1: in modern medieval so to speak, courts of the dragon
Speaker 1: court by the royals, where they would have a jester
Speaker 1: that would be considered their priest at the court to
Speaker 1: give them advices, and they need to disguise to hide
Speaker 1: what they're doing there. Right, So from their perspective, right
Speaker 1: down through history, they control the religions and the churches
Speaker 1: through their bloodline priests. That is part of that top
Speaker 1: to classes that they that they populate, and so when
Speaker 1: Christianity comes along, they need to get control of that too,
Speaker 1: and they continually try. And you surpent how much control
Speaker 1: in the back and forth that you had throughout the
Speaker 1: pope rule. You could debate forever with some good popes
Speaker 1: technically or they just still polytheist but kind of doing
Speaker 1: good things for human kinders, is this constant power play
Speaker 1: going back and forth. That's that's a whole different argument.
Speaker 1: But understand that they believe that they got control over
Speaker 1: the bloodline of the popees, and they call it a
Speaker 1: pope black nobility. And a lot of times throughout pope history,
Speaker 1: when a pope is elected and the royales don't like it,
Speaker 1: they assassinate the pope or replace the pope. That's called
Speaker 1: an anti pope, and it happened several times, many times
Speaker 1: throughout the history. So there's this interaction between the two.
Speaker 1: And so now we need to understand in the context
Speaker 1: of what he's talking about is the black nobility, and
Speaker 1: there's a senior group and there's a junior group. So
Speaker 1: the junior group are the black nobility that moved into
Speaker 1: at a later date of the Etruscan Italian Roman history.
Speaker 1: They're going to migrate out of Phoenicia and Tier, which
Speaker 1: is like the economic Beast Empire is not a real
Speaker 1: beast empire, but it's attached to all the Beast empires,
Speaker 1: just as you're going to see that same type of
Speaker 1: system attached to the End Time Empire with the Babylon
Speaker 1: and its four components that you need to understand it
Speaker 1: as in one of those is this economic system that
Speaker 1: is going to control all of the trade until Anti
Speaker 1: Christ destroys it at the midpoint of the last seven years.
Speaker 1: So as we understand that this is a migration that
Speaker 1: moves into Venice and Florence and controls the trade and
Speaker 1: starts to control some of the banking. And so the
Speaker 1: Medicis would be the most famous of this junior black
Speaker 1: nobility who are going to get control of Vatican banking
Speaker 1: for a period of time, and they're going to have
Speaker 1: nominees that they're trying to put in from their family
Speaker 1: as being a pope, and I think to actually get
Speaker 1: one as a pope, you have like the Borgia as
Speaker 1: part of the the black nobility of this junior nobility,
Speaker 1: but it's junior to an older bloodline of that region.
Speaker 1: And the Etruscans are the Scythians. They are the proto Romans,
Speaker 1: they are the proto Latins. They are the original people
Speaker 1: that the descendants of Jeffeth are going to go and
Speaker 1: marry amongst. And this is the bloodlines that begin with
Speaker 1: Romulus and Remus, who are the sons of Aris and
Speaker 1: or Mars in the Latin pantheon, same god, different name,
Speaker 1: it's the war god, and he produces Romulus and Remus
Speaker 1: and the hundred senator families all descend back to Romulus
Speaker 1: and Remus, and this is the senior black nobility, and
Speaker 1: they will produce Julius, Caesar, Augustus, and there's a couple
Speaker 1: other genss as well mixed in with the older black nobility,
Speaker 1: but they consider themselves superior to this other group that
Speaker 1: moves out of the Middle East in the Italian culture
Speaker 1: as we would know it today, and it's this senior
Speaker 1: black nobility that produces the royals and would also be
Speaker 1: producing many of the popes that are going to be elected.
Speaker 1: And understand, up until say one hundred and fifty years ago,
Speaker 1: the poor and the first two classes were not educated right,
Speaker 1: and weren't the priests or the ministers. They're always filled
Speaker 1: by the elite, the elm the giant descendants, and so
Speaker 1: they easily took control of the Roman Church through that
Speaker 1: whole process and Constantine coming to power, and the Roman
Speaker 1: Church becomes a changed church from the Jerusalem Church that's
Speaker 1: destroyed in seventy eighty and one would argue the seven
Speaker 1: Churches until you get this transition into power with Constantine,
Speaker 1: and he starts to intermix Mithraism into a Christianity to
Speaker 1: create the state sponsored religion. So you know the day
Speaker 1: that was honored in Zoroastrianism and Mythraism, because Mithraism is
Speaker 1: a branch out of Zoroastrianism. The religion of the Giants
Speaker 1: is Sunday. His birthdate is December twenty five. He is
Speaker 1: known as the great architect of the universe and many
Speaker 1: of the imagery of the black robes and things, just
Speaker 1: as you have that with the Albigensians and the Cathars
Speaker 1: in that branch religion of the same you know, religion
Speaker 1: of the Royales of Europe that they would take back
Speaker 1: to their original religion. You have different branches as they evolved,
Speaker 1: but there they consider it all the same religion. They
Speaker 1: had the same sort of black garbs, and they called
Speaker 1: the priests in Mythrism and Zoroastrianism fathers, just as priests
Speaker 1: are called father in the Roman Church when we're told
Speaker 1: only to call God father by Jesus. So you have
Speaker 1: a lot of this merging that's going on. And so
Speaker 1: he's a royale, he's of the black nobility bloodlines, and
Speaker 1: he's got control over the church and he makes changes
Speaker 1: to it and not saying that God wasn't necessarily using
Speaker 1: him in a way that would spread the word, because
Speaker 1: I think that's what happens. But I don't think we
Speaker 1: should look at Constantine as being a pure Christian force
Speaker 1: the way that he did some things like in changing
Speaker 1: the church, adding their rituals in it, bringing in some
Speaker 1: of the polytheist rituals and imagery. So they controlled through
Speaker 1: the black nobility, both at the top end for all
Speaker 1: the bishops and the priests and the elected popes, and
Speaker 1: then through the banking side through the junior nobility. So
Speaker 1: we would see more of a reflection of the junior
Speaker 1: merchants in the Committee of three hundred as part of
Speaker 1: the three hundred families controlling finance, but below the Council
Speaker 1: of thirty three families in the Thalamic tree trunk hierarchy
Speaker 1: loved thirteen families of the West, if that made some sense.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and those are the tinkers that you were uh,
Speaker 3: that he was talking about earlier.
Speaker 1: Yes, exactly, nothing to you.
Speaker 3: Brought up soul and bigtus and uh uh Constantine and
Speaker 3: how he brought in mythricism and even going back to
Speaker 3: Acaton you mentioned earlier. Yeah, he was depicted as this
Speaker 3: elongated head giant and what was he known for that
Speaker 3: He was known as the heretic heretic pharaoh that changed
Speaker 3: their whole religious system and had them worshiping the Sun
Speaker 3: to Autun.
Speaker 1: Yep, yeah they raised uh, yeah, they raised Auton over Aman.
Speaker 1: And then you see the imagery adopted out of Egypt
Speaker 1: for Mary and the baby Jesus. That is the image
Speaker 1: Egyptian image of the female goddess I don't want a name,
Speaker 1: consort of Osiris and Horace. And in the Gnostic Freemasonry
Speaker 1: Bloodline organization, one of their allegories for the parent gods
Speaker 1: because the offspring gods that rule after the flood, which
Speaker 1: are part of the Osiris group and the Horrors group
Speaker 1: versus the raw and the parent gods, both of those
Speaker 1: are allegories for the original head of the pantheon. It's
Speaker 1: like Satan that sits above the seven and he sits
Speaker 1: above the Council of Gods and whatever consort he would
Speaker 1: have had in that belief system from before, because the
Speaker 1: matriarchy is actually higher in that Gnostic system than the patriarch.
Speaker 1: And in the true levels they honor the war goddess
Speaker 1: and fertility goddess and Queen of Heaven more than they
Speaker 1: do the patriarchal God. We see this in a gnosticism
Speaker 1: with Sophia and with this nebulous life force that creates
Speaker 1: the twelve archons of Gnosticism. So this imagery is the
Speaker 1: same imagery that we have depicting Jesus and Mary, and
Speaker 1: they've read is married to a mother goddess type aspect,
Speaker 1: and the same queen of Heaven as a Mother of
Speaker 1: God imagery. So we see all sorts of things that
Speaker 1: have creeped in. And I have to tell you that
Speaker 1: the Jerusalem Church, and I know you're aware of this,
Speaker 1: in the Seven Churches were more akin to Judaism in
Speaker 1: terms of how they worshiped and honored God than Christianity
Speaker 1: is today through the Roman Church. But we have to
Speaker 1: say is just as God used Cyrus, he can use
Speaker 1: anybody he wants to promote things. And what did happen
Speaker 1: through the church is the Bible, even though it's done
Speaker 1: through an absolutely controlled way where it wasn't ever people
Speaker 1: are educated to read it. And then for you know,
Speaker 1: up until the sixties, Mass was only done in Latin, right,
Speaker 1: most people didn't speak Latin except for who the educated
Speaker 1: elite of the West. It still got the Gospel out there,
Speaker 1: and it created Christians, even though they may have been
Speaker 1: misled by a lot of the flock leaders.
Speaker 3: Yeah, welly, before we go. I know we've been tied
Speaker 3: up for two hours. We had so many technical difficulties.
Speaker 3: And I appreciate you suffering through and pushing through and
Speaker 3: getting this done for me. But I don't want to
Speaker 3: take up all your time today. But before I leave,
Speaker 3: this is something that's been itching at me and I
Speaker 3: wanted to ask you about it, and I was kind
Speaker 3: of waiting towards the end. But the Caucasus Mountains area
Speaker 3: and the Black Sea, as far as my knowledge, that's
Speaker 3: where you get a lot of like your Scythian stuff
Speaker 3: because that's northern. But you hear all these stories about
Speaker 3: Medea and she was, you know, the if you want
Speaker 3: to look at like a matriarch, that's kind of what
Speaker 3: it was. That she was this high priestess and she
Speaker 3: was depicted as red hair, had all this sorcery and stuff,
Speaker 3: and you hear tales and history about the Scynthian women
Speaker 3: would ride down on the horses and poison the men
Speaker 3: and paralyze them and do all this kind of sorcery
Speaker 3: type stuff. And some people even theorize that Medea is
Speaker 3: the woman in scarlet on the beast in Revelations. You know,
Speaker 3: she's the horror of Babylon and in her cup as
Speaker 3: many pornea and all the sexual stuff tied to her.
Speaker 3: I didn't know if this ties in if she was
Speaker 3: of this dragon court or lineage in your research.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so in all of the different patheons, you have
Speaker 1: the queen of heaven, and so Lilof is a queen
Speaker 1: of heaven. Inana is a queen of heaven, and that
Speaker 1: consort of Bail is a queen of heaven. Astroth, consort
Speaker 1: of l before the flood, is a queen of heaven.
Speaker 1: The chief of the pantheon and the allegory for the parent,
Speaker 1: the true one at the top that would counterfeit God's
Speaker 1: Holy Trinity, are known as the queen of Heaven, and
Speaker 1: that's a title that is used by Sophia as well.
Speaker 1: And Sophia is depicted and these queen of heavens are
Speaker 1: depicted as the woman in Revelation seventeen is. But that's
Speaker 1: a usurping rights, that is that woman represents. As we
Speaker 1: take it back to the old Testament Israel and Judah
Speaker 1: is called a woman and as part of the bride
Speaker 1: that will be reconciled as part of the bride time
Speaker 1: for the supper of the Lamb. So and it produces
Speaker 1: the tribes. And when you read Relation twelve, you understand
Speaker 1: that that is the time at the abomination where Judea flees, right,
Speaker 1: that's coincides with the timetable. So the woman that is
Speaker 1: described in the old records is more akin to the
Speaker 1: one that rides the beast. But they try and may
Speaker 1: change everything into an angel of light, so to speak,
Speaker 1: and usurp the sign in Revelation twelve for that imagery.
Speaker 1: Just as Mary is depicted as the same way, all
Speaker 1: the queens of heaven are now depicted in that kind
Speaker 1: of way. And that the woman is the woman of Babylon,
Speaker 1: the source religion, the mother of Harlot's as she's described
Speaker 1: in Revelation seventeen. And so it's the chief, original matriarchal
Speaker 1: god that rides the beast of empires with the daughters
Speaker 1: of the Babylon. But it's the original one that's coming
Speaker 1: back for the end time. So media would be equivalent
Speaker 1: and probably the same as Sibiling and the Sibiling prophecies
Speaker 1: and comes both come with oracle capabilities and profit capability.
Speaker 1: And this is the woman that would also be associated
Speaker 1: in the templar understanding of the Woman of Babylon as well.
Speaker 1: That is this universal religion that they want to bring
Speaker 1: about in the end time. All we're seeing throughout the
Speaker 1: different cultures are the same descriptions of the same root
Speaker 1: mother religion and the one that was in charge of
Speaker 1: that as the fertility fertility goddess. So that's the old
Speaker 1: religion that's coming back, and it's going to be presented
Speaker 1: in these different images to the different cultures around the
Speaker 1: world with that type of apparition. So not only do
Speaker 1: we have Mary apparitions, we have like apparitions of of
Speaker 1: Hera and hathor in in Africa, and we have the
Speaker 1: Black Madonna and other ones that are associated with Mary,
Speaker 1: and there's more and more and more of these type
Speaker 1: of apparitions Inana has been said to be appearing in
Speaker 1: Middle East and Eastern areas. So it's just playing to
Speaker 1: the various modern cultures of their history that's going to
Speaker 1: be trying to bring that back into that universe, that
Speaker 1: universal religion of the end time. So when I look
Speaker 1: at the mother, the woman that's in Revelation seventeen, this
Speaker 1: is that core original religion that crosses the flood, and
Speaker 1: we see it rises Zoroastrianism in Persia with the black
Speaker 1: haired Aryans and the Alkhemea dynasty, and the Persians actually
Speaker 1: make Zoroastrianism as a state sponsored religion a few hundred
Speaker 1: years before Constantine does his, and he uses that sort
Speaker 1: of image I'd say more than two hundred years, let's
Speaker 1: say more like four hundred years or so to get
Speaker 1: the history right on that, And so he's modeling the
Speaker 1: same type of political maneuver, and that Zoroastrianism has as
Speaker 1: their chief god Mitra in Indo Aryan Mitr, and it
Speaker 1: means a covenant or a bonding or a friendship, just
Speaker 1: as his incarnation is understood as Lord Matreya, and just
Speaker 1: as Baffomet, the god that the templars worshiped, means Father Mitra,
Speaker 1: which is an allegory for Azazel, because that's the one
Speaker 1: who they truly take their knowledge back to and that
Speaker 1: they were honoring. And Lord Matreya is an incarnation of
Speaker 1: Mitra that comes back at the end of an age
Speaker 1: and is very much akin to Shiva, a destroyer god,
Speaker 1: because the stories are the same. And understand that one
Speaker 1: branch of the dark haired Arians settled in Persia, the
Speaker 1: other one settled in the Indus Valley, which is why
Speaker 1: you have the same Hindu type of gods that are
Speaker 1: used in a lot of treaties in the Mesopotamia region
Speaker 1: Syrian regions with the Hittites, because they were celebrating the
Speaker 1: same religion, just slightly different spelling to the names between
Speaker 1: Evastan Indo Aryanism and Sanscript Indo Aryan that goes back
Speaker 1: to the original Pi proto Indo Arain or Proto Indo
Speaker 1: European language. The spellings are so very close, it's just
Speaker 1: amazing when you get into it. And so this Mitra
Speaker 1: comes back as a destroyer god, has an incarnation at
Speaker 1: the end of an age and then recreates the world
Speaker 1: for their offspring that they're going to somehow take with
Speaker 1: them into the New Age. So when we look at
Speaker 1: Mitra that's talked about in terms of Lord Matraya with
Speaker 1: gnosticism and the externalization of the hierarchy that introduces the
Speaker 1: age of Lord Matreya as the new age beliefs, and
Speaker 1: the Gnostics believe that started in twenty twenty five. We
Speaker 1: should be aware of some of this imagery because this
Speaker 1: is not what Jesus does. Jesus is not an incarnation.
Speaker 1: An incarnation is where a god, let's say, like Vishnu,
Speaker 1: the avatar takes an avatara like Buddha, who already has
Speaker 1: a body, soul, and a spirit in that Eukatian and
Speaker 1: then joins within that to give that individual more power
Speaker 1: and wisdom and in this station and creates a religion.
Speaker 1: It's similar, but it's more symbiotic, we think, at least
Speaker 1: that's what the occult says, but very much similar and
Speaker 1: more powerful than what a demonic possession, because this is
Speaker 1: a full fledge fallen angel. And so when we look
Speaker 1: at this avatar avatar effect, we see Satan doing this
Speaker 1: with Judas at the time of the crucifixion to have
Speaker 1: enough courage to go through he enters into Judas. We
Speaker 1: also know Anti Christ is going to receive all of
Speaker 1: its power from the Dragon and from Satan in the
Speaker 1: end time, whether or not that's two different angels, or
Speaker 1: the dragon is referring to the antime empire, or both
Speaker 1: Satan's involves how some way, and maybe Isazel is because
Speaker 1: Zazel's in the pit prison, then somehow is associated with
Speaker 1: Anti Christ is the one who comes up out of
Speaker 1: the pit prison in time to kill the two Witnesses
Speaker 1: and to become the eighth empires. So all of this
Speaker 1: is coming together, and we're going to be sold this
Speaker 1: Christ's consciousness aspect as part of the great apostasy that's
Speaker 1: going to be coming to have Babylon become the universal religion.
Speaker 1: That's where part of the tribulation comes from for the Saints,
Speaker 1: is that people are going to say no, and there's
Speaker 1: going to be two tribulations, one by Anti Christ, but
Speaker 1: before that it's the Babylon tribulation. And she's the one
Speaker 1: who has the blood of all the saints on her
Speaker 1: throughout history, so we know it's that same religion as
Speaker 1: we follow that allegory then back into prehistory and the
Speaker 1: Beast empires and that it is the Ten Kings who
Speaker 1: in that hour of trial, in that hour that the
Speaker 1: two Witnesses are killed in that hour just before Babylon
Speaker 1: is destroyed within an hour, the hour of the ten
Speaker 1: Kings hand their power over to Anti Christ. That Anti
Speaker 1: Christ will destroy Babylon, and you get the last three
Speaker 1: and a half years rolling forward from there. So we
Speaker 1: need to understand the intricacies of what's going to come
Speaker 1: about in this great apostasy or falling away. Jesus describes
Speaker 1: that in Matthew twenty four ten, after the affliction Greek
Speaker 1: Philippites or tribulation where the saints are going to be
Speaker 1: killed for the testimony of Jesus as part of the
Speaker 1: First Fruits and the First Fruit resurrection, they're offended. That's
Speaker 1: really poor language in modern knowledge because nobody what has
Speaker 1: been offended me, Well, that's scandalidzio, and it means to entice,
Speaker 1: descind apostasy, falling away. So now if you overlay two
Speaker 1: Thessalonians two onto that, you get perfect chronology of what's
Speaker 1: happening before the shoeing and the the shoeing and the
Speaker 1: revealing of the anti Christ. As you put those two
Speaker 1: words together in the original Greek, it means showing who
Speaker 1: he is without any shadow of a doubt, like he
Speaker 1: raises himself to be the true Anti Christ of no
Speaker 1: doubt for what he does, which is crowning himself in
Speaker 1: the temple at the abomination so we need to be
Speaker 1: aware of these these of these parts of history as
Speaker 1: we're being educated with it through the elite controlling still
Speaker 1: the top two classes and brainwashing us with everything. We
Speaker 1: live in the sea of gentiles. We live in the
Speaker 1: sea of the world ruled over by the bloodlines. So
Speaker 1: all the entertainment, the religions, the media, the literature, every
Speaker 1: everything is controlled by them, and it always has been
Speaker 1: because they kept us uneducated for most of our history.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I think we should understand various aspects of
Speaker 1: these mother goddesses, but understand the commonalty and the same sourcing,
Speaker 1: and know the difference between an offspring god that rules
Speaker 1: after the flood, a parent god that rules before the flood,
Speaker 1: and then whoever sits above the Council of the Gods
Speaker 1: that they try and keep as secret as possible, which
Speaker 1: is why we don't get a lot of information on that.
Speaker 1: But it's going to be a male god and a
Speaker 1: female goddess, and then they're going to have some sort
Speaker 1: of original dragon Messiah type of figures. So I would
Speaker 1: think there would be something like that, like an orion,
Speaker 1: like an atlas, like others that you could name before
Speaker 1: the flood as well. Because nothing is new under the
Speaker 1: sun and what was will be again and so and
Speaker 1: the understanding of that that only brings grief and sorrow
Speaker 1: and Ezekiel thirty seven and I'll just finish on one
Speaker 1: aspect of what you're talking about with what the Affairs
Speaker 1: believe in their belief system is that the kings and
Speaker 1: queens were selected for tall stature. This is downstream because
Speaker 1: of the intermarriage and the palest of complexion.
Speaker 3: That's why he was chosen. He was head and shoulders
Speaker 3: than the rest.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the Israels wanted a king like the other kings giants,
Speaker 1: and he was the tallest and a great warrior amongst them.
Speaker 1: For the palace of complexion, redness and the red gold
Speaker 1: of their hair which is considered higher than the blonde
Speaker 1: in the hierarchy, and green and hazel eyes and of
Speaker 1: their framing faces. So I just think look to their
Speaker 1: faces and second for the blonde hair and blue eyed traits,
Speaker 1: and that they trace their blood aline in part back
Speaker 1: to the Dukes of Edom, the Horring, which were red
Speaker 1: hair giants as I define and take that back for people,
Speaker 1: and they were pale skin and skin as you take
Speaker 1: the name of Horring back to its meaning. And these
Speaker 1: are the dukes of syr and so they're going to
Speaker 1: Inemary with the Edomites sentence of esl and the word
Speaker 1: duke is the Hebrew word alaf. And this is as
Speaker 1: it is described a bloodline of kings and the Catholic
Speaker 1: Encyclopedia as the alopheme, now alaugh is sourced in a
Speaker 1: word that is elf, a sort of alf as it
Speaker 1: is transliterated in just as you have that as a
Speaker 1: transliteration that they take in as for the fairy aspect
Speaker 1: is in elf or Elvin. So the elopheme, the alviam,
Speaker 1: all the same sort of transliterations. And so these are
Speaker 1: the dukes. And also you have dukes. That's a very
Speaker 1: important part of the titles within the hierarchy of the royales,
Speaker 1: of the ruling royal families. I won't go into all
Speaker 1: of that, but it's all sort of transferred through into
Speaker 1: their legacy and they produce, you know, alaf, which could
Speaker 1: be chief for a ruler, but they used duke because
Speaker 1: it was part of their belief system for that translation.
Speaker 1: So again I don't necessarily disagree with the translation. I
Speaker 1: just find it uncomfortable that it's part of the royal
Speaker 1: sort of word nomenclature aspect to it, and that they
Speaker 1: these Whorem intermarried with not only Esau with a Holy
Speaker 1: Bama to create a hybrid race from a brother of
Speaker 1: Jacob or Israel, but also Elaphaz married Teama to create
Speaker 1: the Amalakite, the hybrid branch versus the Amalachem that are
Speaker 1: shown Predatum in Genesis sixteen. And they're the ones who
Speaker 1: are trying to destroy Israel when they come out of
Speaker 1: Egypt so that they can inherit that birthright with their
Speaker 1: own dragon. Messiah and the Az trace these twelve tribes
Speaker 1: as they list them coming out of Amilak and and
Speaker 1: Amilak and Aliphaz and Isa and a Holy Bama as
Speaker 1: intermarring back into the Kazite in metanis Btanic dynasty that
Speaker 1: they linked their lineage is back into and part of
Speaker 1: that connection to the gods of Samaria with Anu. So
Speaker 1: again we have this history in Genesis thirty six is
Speaker 1: outside the Table of Nations, and Horem are described as
Speaker 1: giants and Deuteronomy too, just as other tribes are listed there.
Speaker 1: And this is listed there because it's information we have
Speaker 1: to have to understand the old Testament and how this
Speaker 1: world works. But you have giant patriarchs there, and you're
Speaker 1: not going to have a giant patriarch listed in the
Speaker 1: Table of nations. These are the descendants of Noah. So
Speaker 1: we don't get the patriarch for the Anachem, which the
Speaker 1: Book of Joshua says is Arba. We don't get that
Speaker 1: in the Table of Nations. We don't, you know, we
Speaker 1: get these anachem giants that are showing up as they
Speaker 1: show up in number thirteen and also Deuteronomy IE and
Speaker 1: throughout the conquest of the land, but their origination, to
Speaker 1: the source of their understanding of Deuteronomy too is giants
Speaker 1: like the imine and the other giants. We also don't
Speaker 1: get the rough patriarch rapha, but we get the tribes
Speaker 1: showing up in the War of Giants and Genesis fourteen.
Speaker 1: And part of the tribes that's showing up in the
Speaker 1: land that Abraham's going to inherit, he's not in there.
Speaker 1: And we don't get the get nine of the twelve
Speaker 1: patriarchs for the Canaanites, the only patriarchs that don't have
Speaker 1: a patriarch or these nine. But yet you have Canaanite,
Speaker 1: Sidon and Heth. That's because those patriarchs are rafaying patriarchs
Speaker 1: that intermarried with sentence of Canaan or descendants of Heath
Speaker 1: or descendants of Sidon, and with females specifically, and they
Speaker 1: started their own tribes. But yet they're not considered the
Speaker 1: same level of a dynasty because it's not that female
Speaker 1: giant that's intermarring with an ennoble human line to start
Speaker 1: that dynasty, as with the Amalekites who go and live
Speaker 1: amongst the Amalachem in the Petra area after that, and
Speaker 1: they accept Genesis thirty six as part of their genealogical
Speaker 1: history in the diffair on Zieu family.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's one of those things too, I tell people,
Speaker 3: you know, like you had mentioned earlier in the episode, Gary,
Speaker 3: you know, the genealogies can be boring and you can
Speaker 3: just kind of skim right over them, but they're there
Speaker 3: for a reason. And you know, I think it's pretty
Speaker 3: clear after our discussion today, because you know, believe it
Speaker 3: or not, whether it's allegory, physical, whatever, but you can't
Speaker 3: debate that this is what the belief system of the
Speaker 3: people is that there was two lines there was a
Speaker 3: seed war, and there was a reason why they kept
Speaker 3: these genealogies and separated themselves from these people. I think
Speaker 3: it all goes back to even Jesus's parable or the
Speaker 3: wheat and the tears.
Speaker 1: It does, it does, I think. And what's important about
Speaker 1: the Genesis six ones and the right reason why they
Speaker 1: include that that is part of their matriarchal fairy allegory
Speaker 1: through Tinda in this case and the Amalekites and also
Speaker 1: a holy Mama that's just again just fits perfectly in
Speaker 1: how they sion and noble things and the term, you know,
Speaker 1: transliterating Elvin l fairy is just they're just so creative
Speaker 1: in how they do these things through you know, lf
Speaker 1: And I would also point people to Psalms twenty one,
Speaker 1: eight through ten if you don't think that there's a
Speaker 1: separate seed line. We could go right from a seed
Speaker 1: line of the serpent seed and the serpent's route. We
Speaker 1: could talk about the branch of the terrible ones in
Speaker 1: Isaiah twenty five that are talked about in Ezekiel thirty two.
Speaker 1: But the most clear is not only the branch in
Speaker 1: Isaiah twenty five of these terrible ones that are killed
Speaker 1: on a mountain in the end time matches up perfectly
Speaker 1: with Psalms twenty one eight through ten, and in that
Speaker 1: passage just talking about a time of God's anger and wrath. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is the year of the Lord's wrath and year
Speaker 1: of recompense for the sake of Israel. And in that
Speaker 1: time he's going to devour by fire. So again another
Speaker 1: end time connection to the type of the disaster. He's
Speaker 1: going to consume with fire, devour with fire their fruit
Speaker 1: and destroy them from the earth and their seed from
Speaker 1: the children of men. I can't think of a better
Speaker 1: smoking gun passage other than in Deuteronomy two forty three,
Speaker 1: where they're going to mix their seed with humankind in
Speaker 1: the end time. Again that but this one is just
Speaker 1: so clear that they're talking about two different seed races,
Speaker 1: and so does the tears.
Speaker 3: It goes back to what you just said earlier to Gary,
Speaker 3: you know, nothing news under the sun corn to Solomon,
Speaker 3: And as it was in the Day's of no so
Speaker 3: it shall be in the coming of the summer the
Speaker 3: son of Man. So I mean, history repeats itself, and
Speaker 3: I think you know, he lays it out like that
Speaker 3: just because for that fact, that way we can be
Speaker 3: good Bereans and read the histories and see how these
Speaker 3: things play out, because it's it's almost circular.
Speaker 1: It is, and I think that's what Ecclesiastics is telling us,
Speaker 1: and I think that's why we get this sort of
Speaker 1: long history to understand that. You know, even as you
Speaker 1: look at two Peter three, that there may have been
Speaker 1: a destruction by fire in the beginning between Genesis one
Speaker 1: one to two, because that was what was reserved for
Speaker 1: the end time. And now all of a sudden you
Speaker 1: get thinking, well, maybe they had the technology destroy the
Speaker 1: earth by fire, and God had the flood come because
Speaker 1: that fire destruction is reserved for the end time. So
Speaker 1: if they did have an anti Christ figure, and we
Speaker 1: get accounts of Atlantis and the ten Kings trying to
Speaker 1: take universal control, and the flood comes partly from the
Speaker 1: violence from the giants, and also the technology shook off
Speaker 1: that perverts and corrupts everything in the flesh and on
Speaker 1: the earth, And so this seems to be an intercession
Speaker 1: and a destruction to start anew, but not by fire
Speaker 1: because that's reserved for the end time. But Jesus will
Speaker 1: step in so not all flesh is stopped at the
Speaker 1: end time, and so it seems to be that there
Speaker 1: is this cycle. There may have been something between Genesis one,
Speaker 1: one and two. I know that's a bit speculative, but
Speaker 1: you can make a good biblical argument that there's a
Speaker 1: gap there with how you translate things and passages throughout
Speaker 1: the Bible. You have this apocalypse by water that's connected
Speaker 1: to the apocalypse by fire in Jesus's account in the
Speaker 1: days of Noah in law, the same type of crimes
Speaker 1: that were done at Sodom that were done before the flood,
Speaker 1: and it's like a transition allegory from just okay, here
Speaker 1: we have the flood story, but now Luke puts in
Speaker 1: Sodom and the flood story as a transitional one to
Speaker 1: connect us is going to be like that again in
Speaker 1: the end time, which is why Saudum and Gomora is
Speaker 1: use for an allegory of destruction in the end time
Speaker 1: as well. So I think we should understand that there's
Speaker 1: this cycle and all of these beast empires that come
Speaker 1: after the flood, they're trying to put an anti Christ
Speaker 1: on the throne, and only one is ordained to do so,
Speaker 1: and I think that's who Michael prevents, not from the Empire,
Speaker 1: from coming but from Antichrist taking power, as it's talked
Speaker 1: about in the Book of as he's talked about in
Speaker 1: the Book of Daniel.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, Gary Man, thank you so much for coming
Speaker 3: on and just blowing our minds again. And like I said,
Speaker 3: i'd read that, I'd read your book, I had listened
Speaker 3: to that audiobook on this guy, so I definitely wanted
Speaker 3: to have you be the bridge gap and see what
Speaker 3: rhymes and what doesn't. So I really appreciate you time.
Speaker 3: Before we go, Gary, just let heybody know if they
Speaker 3: don't know where to find you, like your websites books,
Speaker 3: where can they best find your content in your books?
Speaker 1: Yeah, so the best place to do that, the fastest
Speaker 1: and easiest way is to go to my website, the
Speaker 1: Genesis sixth conspiracy dot com. That's Genesis sixth, number six
Speaker 1: conspiracy dot com. On the website, I have a generous
Speaker 1: excerpt of all ninety eighth chapters of book one, all
Speaker 1: eighty four chapters of book two. There's a buy now
Speaker 1: page and buy from author, So if you wanted to
Speaker 1: get a sign copy for me, you can go there.
Speaker 1: And if you're in the US, there's a US page
Speaker 1: for you to go to. If you're in Canada, there's
Speaker 1: a Canadian page I live in Canada, and if anywhere
Speaker 1: else in the world, there's an international page to go
Speaker 1: to to get a signed copy. If you wanted to
Speaker 1: link over to Barnesannoble dot com or Amazon dot com
Speaker 1: Amazon dot com, you can from any of the by
Speaker 1: pages and the front page of the website, and you
Speaker 1: can buy a printed copy from them as well, And
Speaker 1: it's also available on most online bookstores, but the fastest
Speaker 1: easiest way to get there is through my website and
Speaker 1: then directly over to the book on Amazon if that's
Speaker 1: where you wanted to go, and the Kindle version. You
Speaker 1: have direct links to the by page for the Kindle
Speaker 1: version for both from the buy now page as well,
Speaker 1: and also direct links from the audible version over to
Speaker 1: the audible page on Amazon for both books as well.
Speaker 1: And if you're wanting to buy multiple books for me
Speaker 1: on buy one, that's for book one, so there's discounts
Speaker 1: if you buy more than one book, so starting at two,
Speaker 1: there's a discount and it goes up from there, same
Speaker 1: with by page two for book two, and if you
Speaker 1: wanted to buy one at each or mixed quantities of that,
Speaker 1: then you would go to the buy three page and
Speaker 1: then you can mix and match the quantities as you
Speaker 1: like on that.
Speaker 3: That's awesome, Gary, Well once again, man, thank you. You
Speaker 3: are a deep well of knowledge and I look so
Speaker 3: forward to speaking with you because the conversations are always
Speaker 3: just amazing and you always blow my mind every single time,
Speaker 3: and that's what I'm here for. Man, I want my
Speaker 3: mind blown, and you can do that. I've jokingly said,
Speaker 3: I think it was the last time you were on
Speaker 3: I made a reference to the Late That They Live
Speaker 3: movie and I'd said, Gary's here to chew bubble gum
Speaker 3: and blow paradigms, and he's fresh out of the buble gum.
Speaker 1: Every time. No, I just try and present information and
Speaker 1: connect thoughts for people and help them better understand where
Speaker 1: we came from, what's going on today, and where we're going.
Speaker 1: And you don't continue your own research because you need
Speaker 1: to decide on your own what you believe, and as
Speaker 1: opposed to believing what other people have told you, fight
Speaker 1: for yourself because it's it's all important, and no decision
Speaker 1: in terms of what you believe is still a decision.
Speaker 1: So you should research and make your own decision. Amen.
Speaker 3: That's what I tell everybody, man, and that's why I'm
Speaker 3: going just the hero's journey, guys. And remember, hey, the
Speaker 3: difference between the known and the unknown is the journey.
Speaker 3: So it starts your journey. Do your own researching for
Speaker 3: me on ding you guys. Until next time towards the
Speaker 3: high guys,