WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:03.279
<v Speaker 1>S S.

2
00:01:19.519 --> 00:01:38.959
<v Speaker 2>S S.

3
00:02:41.319 --> 00:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

4
00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

5
00:03:00.520 --> 00:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah. There have there have, there have, there have Yeah.

6
00:03:55.400 --> 00:05:08.240
<v Speaker 5>The career.

7
00:05:15.399 --> 00:05:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Success success success success success success.

8
00:05:35.360 --> 00:05:45.839
<v Speaker 6>Ssss success ss ss.

9
00:06:18.920 --> 00:06:27.959
<v Speaker 7>S S S S S S S S S S

10
00:06:28.920 --> 00:06:32.000
<v Speaker 7>S S S S.

11
00:06:35.879 --> 00:06:47.040
<v Speaker 3>S s s s S s s S.

12
00:06:54.480 --> 00:08:43.840
<v Speaker 7>Second second.

13
00:08:46.480 --> 00:08:57.159
<v Speaker 8>Second second, second second.

14
00:09:35.159 --> 00:09:36.080
<v Speaker 9>We've learned so much.

15
00:09:36.759 --> 00:09:38.840
<v Speaker 10>If you've been on the Jaysonnalysis, right, A lot of

16
00:09:38.879 --> 00:09:41.279
<v Speaker 10>you guys are new, I understand, that's cool. Glad to

17
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:44.799
<v Speaker 10>have you here, but some of you have been with

18
00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:47.759
<v Speaker 10>me for the long haul. In fact, there are some

19
00:09:47.919 --> 00:09:50.919
<v Speaker 10>who've been with Jays Analysis for ten years, reading it

20
00:09:52.639 --> 00:09:55.919
<v Speaker 10>back in the day, and we've come a long way,

21
00:09:57.639 --> 00:10:02.320
<v Speaker 10>come a long way. All right, Welcome, thank you, glad

22
00:10:02.360 --> 00:10:05.600
<v Speaker 10>to see you all here. I got a room of

23
00:10:05.679 --> 00:10:08.720
<v Speaker 10>almost two hundred nerds. I'm sure the nerds will file

24
00:10:08.799 --> 00:10:10.960
<v Speaker 10>in then we can get up to about three hundred.

25
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Den I will see.

26
00:10:15.480 --> 00:10:21.919
<v Speaker 9>You, boy, Jay in the house. You boy can't see me.

27
00:10:23.240 --> 00:11:02.759
<v Speaker 11>Thanks.

28
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:15.639
<v Speaker 8>Boots shoot Shots, boots, Shop boots, shoots and Storm boots, boots,

29
00:11:15.679 --> 00:14:51.960
<v Speaker 8>Stop boots, Stier sun was s.

30
00:15:24.840 --> 00:15:27.519
<v Speaker 9>All right, welcome and if you can try to avoid

31
00:15:27.559 --> 00:15:32.240
<v Speaker 9>those clicking in the background, David, Yeah, all right, welcome

32
00:15:32.320 --> 00:15:37.480
<v Speaker 9>you are here in another episode of Jay's analysis. Today

33
00:15:37.559 --> 00:15:40.720
<v Speaker 9>we have our good friend, our brother David the real

34
00:15:40.799 --> 00:15:47.080
<v Speaker 9>medwife back. David has delved deeply into the Chalcedonian issue,

35
00:15:47.440 --> 00:15:50.000
<v Speaker 9>the issues of Pope Saint Leo and the so called

36
00:15:50.039 --> 00:15:53.360
<v Speaker 9>Oriental Orthodox. We're going to look at that today. We're

37
00:15:53.399 --> 00:15:56.360
<v Speaker 9>going to get into the topic of how the notion

38
00:15:56.600 --> 00:16:00.200
<v Speaker 9>of hypostasis in nature is part of the confusion. How

39
00:16:00.240 --> 00:16:04.279
<v Speaker 9>there's a development, you could say, in the understanding of

40
00:16:04.320 --> 00:16:06.679
<v Speaker 9>those terms. We're not saying there's a development in doctrine,

41
00:16:06.720 --> 00:16:08.919
<v Speaker 9>but there is a development in which terms will become

42
00:16:09.039 --> 00:16:14.000
<v Speaker 9>precise in our theology over time. And David has done

43
00:16:14.000 --> 00:16:17.039
<v Speaker 9>a lot of research into the actual writings of those

44
00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:20.840
<v Speaker 9>in the opposing camps. And now this is relevant because

45
00:16:20.840 --> 00:16:23.000
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of a false acumenism in our day

46
00:16:23.039 --> 00:16:25.559
<v Speaker 9>which assumes that, oh, well, all these positions are actually

47
00:16:25.679 --> 00:16:28.159
<v Speaker 9>just the same. We're also in the same stuff, so

48
00:16:29.080 --> 00:16:31.279
<v Speaker 9>there's no reason to fight anymore. And anybody who debates

49
00:16:31.360 --> 00:16:33.679
<v Speaker 9>or fights over these issues is unloving and mean and

50
00:16:33.799 --> 00:16:38.440
<v Speaker 9>has spiritual problems, which would mean that everybody at Chalcedon

51
00:16:38.639 --> 00:16:40.840
<v Speaker 9>was unloving and mean and had spiritual problems, because of

52
00:16:40.919 --> 00:16:43.480
<v Speaker 9>course they were debating these issues, and then for the

53
00:16:43.559 --> 00:16:46.159
<v Speaker 9>next two hundred years, in the next two councils, it's

54
00:16:46.240 --> 00:16:50.120
<v Speaker 9>actually the issues of Christology that get hashed out and debated,

55
00:16:50.519 --> 00:16:53.240
<v Speaker 9>particularly the topics will be discussing today. We're going to

56
00:16:53.320 --> 00:16:56.799
<v Speaker 9>cover a lot of those formative central texts and David

57
00:16:56.840 --> 00:16:59.759
<v Speaker 9>has done what three part series. I think I made

58
00:16:59.799 --> 00:17:01.799
<v Speaker 9>it through at least half or.

59
00:17:02.320 --> 00:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great jay this this stream. Some people might

60
00:17:06.240 --> 00:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>remember that we did the stream on Orientals as well,

61
00:17:10.079 --> 00:17:13.599
<v Speaker 1>it was Florence as well. But what's different, what's going

62
00:17:13.680 --> 00:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to be different about this stream is we're going to

63
00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:18.839
<v Speaker 1>be diving more in dept. That stream was kind of

64
00:17:18.920 --> 00:17:21.559
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the common misconceptions. This stream is going to

65
00:17:21.599 --> 00:17:26.519
<v Speaker 1>be explaining pretty much the in depth Christology of Severus

66
00:17:26.519 --> 00:17:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of Antioch, Philuxinus of Madbug, and other Oriental characters. And again,

67
00:17:32.480 --> 00:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I even started doing this is it

68
00:17:35.960 --> 00:17:38.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't sit right with me when I heard so many

69
00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>people say, oh, you know, for for sixteenth centuries, for

70
00:17:42.759 --> 00:17:46.039
<v Speaker 1>like all this time we were actually believing in the

71
00:17:46.440 --> 00:17:50.559
<v Speaker 1>believing in the same exact belief, but we just had

72
00:17:50.720 --> 00:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>terminological problems. And I saw a lot of different argumentations

73
00:17:55.920 --> 00:17:59.799
<v Speaker 1>from copts, which made me say, Okay, I'm going to

74
00:17:59.839 --> 00:18:02.559
<v Speaker 1>look into this. I'm going to research and see what

75
00:18:03.000 --> 00:18:06.279
<v Speaker 1>both sides say, and the theology is really not the same.

76
00:18:06.359 --> 00:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And when I made the video series, which by the way,

77
00:18:10.400 --> 00:18:11.839
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch like you can watch in

78
00:18:11.960 --> 00:18:14.039
<v Speaker 1>any order, like if you want to start with part three,

79
00:18:14.039 --> 00:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to start with geophysicism in the photos,

80
00:18:16.519 --> 00:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. You don't have to like watch it chronologically.

81
00:18:20.480 --> 00:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>When I started to upload the videos, one interesting thing

82
00:18:25.440 --> 00:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that happened is that various different coptic priests have said

83
00:18:29.400 --> 00:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that I don't really understand these issues. They said this

84
00:18:32.559 --> 00:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on face, I don't really understand these issues, but none

85
00:18:35.720 --> 00:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of them really explained how I don't understand these issues.

86
00:18:38.640 --> 00:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And one of them, at least when they were pressed,

87
00:18:42.839 --> 00:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they start to explain a little bit, but they showed

88
00:18:46.759 --> 00:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't. They had no idea what they were

89
00:18:49.240 --> 00:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about. So it really just seemed like, oh, he

90
00:18:51.319 --> 00:18:53.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't has no idea. He thinks we're different, but we're not.

91
00:18:54.759 --> 00:18:57.279
<v Speaker 1>And just and this was back then, I only uploaded

92
00:18:57.319 --> 00:19:01.319
<v Speaker 1>like the introductory parts. So we're going to be talking about.

93
00:19:01.799 --> 00:19:04.160
<v Speaker 9>Why are they always arguing? Why are they always arguing

94
00:19:04.200 --> 00:19:06.319
<v Speaker 9>against us, by the way, if what we say is

95
00:19:06.359 --> 00:19:07.160
<v Speaker 9>not different.

96
00:19:08.319 --> 00:19:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. A lot of them like the way they act.

97
00:19:11.680 --> 00:19:13.839
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them act like we had many people

98
00:19:14.240 --> 00:19:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that were part the Oriental Communion and we asked them

99
00:19:16.839 --> 00:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>who they bishop were in the discord server and none

100
00:19:19.519 --> 00:19:21.519
<v Speaker 1>of them really they didn't really want to say it.

101
00:19:22.319 --> 00:19:25.519
<v Speaker 1>So there's a there's a sentiment, especially between a laity

102
00:19:25.720 --> 00:19:27.839
<v Speaker 1>that like, oh, you know, we really are the same,

103
00:19:27.920 --> 00:19:30.519
<v Speaker 1>and the clergy are to they don't care enough to

104
00:19:30.680 --> 00:19:34.279
<v Speaker 1>actually talk about this. Farrington Peter Finks and he says

105
00:19:34.359 --> 00:19:36.559
<v Speaker 1>that he studied this for thirty years, and he says

106
00:19:36.720 --> 00:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're not different, but we don't accept Alkadon because

107
00:19:43.079 --> 00:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't say the magic words exactly. So the stuff

108
00:19:46.440 --> 00:19:47.839
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be talking about is going to

109
00:19:47.880 --> 00:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>be dealing with the history. We're going to be going

110
00:19:50.200 --> 00:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>back to even fourteeny eight. I'm planning on giving like

111
00:19:53.240 --> 00:19:56.039
<v Speaker 1>a short summary of what happened, because this is all

112
00:19:56.079 --> 00:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be very relevant for people to understand what's

113
00:19:58.440 --> 00:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>going on. As we probably all know, they have a

114
00:20:03.519 --> 00:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>character calledness Stories In four twenty eight it becomes Patriarch

115
00:20:06.400 --> 00:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of Constantinople. He says, stupid stuff like Mary is not

116
00:20:09.319 --> 00:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the Mother of God and all that stuff. Saint Curle

117
00:20:12.519 --> 00:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>starts reading The Fathers, and one interesting thing to note

118
00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:18.559
<v Speaker 1>while he's reading the Fathers is that he comes across

119
00:20:18.599 --> 00:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is important to note because this explains why

120
00:20:21.960 --> 00:20:24.519
<v Speaker 1>the term mea physics even came into play. Now, of course,

121
00:20:24.559 --> 00:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>if you watch the first part, we say that we

122
00:20:27.240 --> 00:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>don't do the word concept fallacy. The concept behind those

123
00:20:30.279 --> 00:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>words is what matters. So Saint Curle reads certain atonation

124
00:20:34.400 --> 00:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>letters when in reality they were written by a pollinarius.

125
00:20:38.799 --> 00:20:41.559
<v Speaker 1>And there are various different people that make note of this.

126
00:20:41.799 --> 00:20:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Timothy in his Ecclesiastical History, who's an Apollinarian disciple, says

127
00:20:46.559 --> 00:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that the term mea physicis was made by a pollinarius

128
00:20:50.759 --> 00:20:53.599
<v Speaker 1>in order to combat the innovation and heresies of the

129
00:20:53.680 --> 00:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Cappadocian fathers and of Saint Antonatius and all these different

130
00:20:57.039 --> 00:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>people who in their eyes are preaching two natures. So

131
00:21:01.079 --> 00:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is kind of important to note. But

132
00:21:04.039 --> 00:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>he came across this term when he was researching about

133
00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the Fathers, and he thought it was generally from Saint Antinasius.

134
00:21:11.039 --> 00:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Now today we know that it's not from Saint Antonatius.

135
00:21:13.960 --> 00:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a pollinarian forgeries, but it's important to note because

136
00:21:17.519 --> 00:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this is really how the term comes to play. Then

137
00:21:21.799 --> 00:21:25.079
<v Speaker 1>first council of emphasis happens. There's an historic council that's

138
00:21:25.079 --> 00:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a split between Antwerk and Alexandri. This is very important

139
00:21:27.400 --> 00:21:29.839
<v Speaker 1>because two years later, in four twenty three, there's a

140
00:21:29.960 --> 00:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>formula of reunion. There's a there's a reunion between Alexander

141
00:21:33.440 --> 00:21:41.319
<v Speaker 1>and Antioch, two patriarchates that have different christologies. And one

142
00:21:41.400 --> 00:21:43.599
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing and this is in letter turned nine and

143
00:21:43.680 --> 00:21:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Saint Carrol that's going to be very relevant when we're

144
00:21:46.319 --> 00:21:49.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about Pope Saint Leo is that he says that

145
00:21:49.440 --> 00:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we know the theologians make some things of the evangelical

146
00:21:52.440 --> 00:21:55.079
<v Speaker 1>and epostolic teaching about the Lord commonists pertaining to the

147
00:21:55.200 --> 00:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one person and other things they divide as the two

148
00:21:58.559 --> 00:22:00.799
<v Speaker 1>natures and attribute the word he wants to God on

149
00:22:00.880 --> 00:22:03.519
<v Speaker 1>account of the divinity of Christ and the lovely ones

150
00:22:03.559 --> 00:22:05.759
<v Speaker 1>on account of his humanity. So this is very relevant

151
00:22:05.839 --> 00:22:08.279
<v Speaker 1>because Pope Saint Louis is the exact same thing in

152
00:22:08.400 --> 00:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>his tomb, but this is not acceptable for him, and

153
00:22:11.720 --> 00:22:14.839
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get into how they defend this from

154
00:22:14.920 --> 00:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Saint Carol, and then Saint Kurle argues against After the reunion,

155
00:22:19.240 --> 00:22:22.759
<v Speaker 1>he argues against Theodore of Mopsuestia and the fifth secure

156
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Medical Council, will we condemn him as a heretic and

157
00:22:26.720 --> 00:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he writes on the unity of Christ. He reposes, and

158
00:22:30.319 --> 00:22:33.759
<v Speaker 1>then other stuff happens, so that there's a council in

159
00:22:33.839 --> 00:22:36.559
<v Speaker 1>four forty eight under the presidency of Saint Flavian, he

160
00:22:36.640 --> 00:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>deposed Utichius, and then a year later Dioscurus says, oh, no,

161
00:22:40.519 --> 00:22:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I have to save him because he doesn't teach. Oh

162
00:22:43.400 --> 00:22:48.839
<v Speaker 1>he was rejected out of a because of Astorianizing patriarchs Ephesis.

163
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>The second council happens. Saint Flavian, EBAs Theodore Dominus two

164
00:22:53.200 --> 00:22:57.079
<v Speaker 1>of Antioch are all deposed. A year lady Saint louis excommunicated,

165
00:22:57.160 --> 00:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>so Dioscurus in one fell swoop just this excommunicating gets

166
00:23:01.720 --> 00:23:05.519
<v Speaker 1>rid of three major patriarchs and other patriarchs as well.

167
00:23:06.160 --> 00:23:07.759
<v Speaker 1>And so this is a big deal, right, This is

168
00:23:07.799 --> 00:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge issue that's going on, and this context is

169
00:23:10.839 --> 00:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>important when we're talking about the Council of Kalkadon. And

170
00:23:13.599 --> 00:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in four fifty one, the Council of Kalkadon happens and begins.

171
00:23:21.079 --> 00:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And on the topic, by the way, j on the

172
00:23:23.200 --> 00:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>topic of all we believe in the same thing. If

173
00:23:27.799 --> 00:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at the Troparia, if you look at the

174
00:23:30.720 --> 00:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Tropario of Severus from the Coptic liturgy. What's really funny

175
00:23:34.920 --> 00:23:38.079
<v Speaker 1>is that they refer to us as heretics. They refer

176
00:23:38.160 --> 00:23:41.519
<v Speaker 1>to Calkeedonias as heretics. But now today, sixteenth centuries later,

177
00:23:41.640 --> 00:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>suddenly we believe the same thing, even though in their

178
00:23:44.759 --> 00:23:47.759
<v Speaker 1>liturgy they refer to Calcadonius as heretics. As you think,

179
00:23:47.839 --> 00:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this is like absolutely silly. We believe in the same thing,

180
00:23:53.720 --> 00:23:57.799
<v Speaker 1>but apparently we are heretics. How how exactly? But so

181
00:23:58.079 --> 00:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what are the oriental problem in the Council of Caltada.

182
00:24:01.480 --> 00:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you watch the part two of my video

183
00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:07.039
<v Speaker 1>series you will I deal with that with I deal

184
00:24:07.079 --> 00:24:12.079
<v Speaker 1>with that argument extensively. So on one problem they have

185
00:24:12.319 --> 00:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is that all you you first said that Christ is

186
00:24:15.079 --> 00:24:18.079
<v Speaker 1>out of two natures, and then you insert into nature's right.

187
00:24:18.240 --> 00:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the arguments they use to say

188
00:24:20.960 --> 00:24:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that there's a direction going to the way of news

189
00:24:23.319 --> 00:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>stories because he said the same thing. So this is

190
00:24:25.960 --> 00:24:30.279
<v Speaker 1>an example of word concept fallacy. In here Nestorius used

191
00:24:30.359 --> 00:24:34.039
<v Speaker 1>into natures. Therefore we cannot say into natures. And as

192
00:24:34.079 --> 00:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, Severus I believe Saint Justinian uh

193
00:24:39.720 --> 00:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>cited Severus in saying this. Saint Justinian says that he

194
00:24:43.279 --> 00:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>makes he makes a point that Severus argues that all

195
00:24:47.319 --> 00:24:49.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when the Father spoke of two natures,

196
00:24:49.559 --> 00:24:53.039
<v Speaker 1>that was fine, but then came Nestorius, and now it's

197
00:24:53.119 --> 00:24:56.519
<v Speaker 1>not fine. So Necessarius kind of poisoned the term in

198
00:24:56.640 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 1>there eyes. And this is a great example of just

199
00:24:59.359 --> 00:25:04.079
<v Speaker 1>the word consp fallacy, genetic fallacy. But the main problem

200
00:25:04.279 --> 00:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>with the tom of Leo, there's two problems. The one

201
00:25:09.480 --> 00:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>problem is that Pope Saint Leo talks about forms operating

202
00:25:14.440 --> 00:25:18.039
<v Speaker 1>and seemingly independently in their eyes right, so he speaks

203
00:25:18.079 --> 00:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of two forms of Christ, and they think that those

204
00:25:21.720 --> 00:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>two forms of Christ means two persons. The problem with

205
00:25:25.279 --> 00:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that is because Pope Saint Leo has a vested understanding

206
00:25:31.440 --> 00:25:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of christology. Forms mean essence, it doesn't mean hypostasis, it

207
00:25:36.799 --> 00:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean.

208
00:25:37.240 --> 00:25:39.720
<v Speaker 9>Any And listen, you see this in Augustine. Augustine does

209
00:25:39.759 --> 00:25:42.880
<v Speaker 9>the same thing in his sections in the City of God,

210
00:25:42.920 --> 00:25:45.519
<v Speaker 9>where he cites the Platonists, he cites God as the

211
00:25:45.599 --> 00:25:49.680
<v Speaker 9>first form, which actually is a mistake in Orthodox theology

212
00:25:49.720 --> 00:25:53.319
<v Speaker 9>of Augustine theology is actually incorrect here, but it shows

213
00:25:53.359 --> 00:25:55.920
<v Speaker 9>it backs up what you're saying, because Augustine is using

214
00:25:56.240 --> 00:25:59.119
<v Speaker 9>form in the sense of essence or nature. And there's

215
00:25:59.119 --> 00:26:02.319
<v Speaker 9>a whole chapter in Brad shows the book on that exactly.

216
00:26:02.400 --> 00:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>And and if you want to add, I use this

217
00:26:04.599 --> 00:26:08.279
<v Speaker 1>quote in Michalkadan video Saint Gregor of Nissa. He says,

218
00:26:08.359 --> 00:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the human nature does not give new life to Laster,

219
00:26:10.880 --> 00:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so that itself. If Saint Leo said this, this will

220
00:26:14.240 --> 00:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>be deemed as heretical. But this is Saint Gregrif Nissa

221
00:26:16.359 --> 00:26:19.519
<v Speaker 1>against Eunomius that says this. And then there's another quote

222
00:26:20.319 --> 00:26:23.519
<v Speaker 1>from Pope Saint Leu in his tone where they argue, oh,

223
00:26:23.880 --> 00:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he asks which nature was on the cross? Well, actually,

224
00:26:27.480 --> 00:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Saint Gregri Nissa again and against Eunomius says asks which

225
00:26:32.039 --> 00:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>form is beaten in the passion and which is glorified

226
00:26:35.240 --> 00:26:38.759
<v Speaker 1>from eternity. So he's talking about the human form, meaning

227
00:26:38.839 --> 00:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the human essence was beaten in the passion, which is

228
00:26:42.079 --> 00:26:44.319
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same thing that Pope, Saint Leo says, So

229
00:26:44.400 --> 00:26:49.599
<v Speaker 1>again these are arguments that Orientals use, but the responses

230
00:26:49.720 --> 00:26:52.519
<v Speaker 1>are fairly simple. So again I'm keeping it simple. If

231
00:26:52.559 --> 00:26:55.039
<v Speaker 1>you want the full explanation, you can look at part

232
00:26:55.079 --> 00:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>two again. So about about letter thirty nine of Saint

233
00:27:02.240 --> 00:27:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Crole Severus and Phililitis. This is text four phil Alitis.

234
00:27:06.559 --> 00:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>So if you have this is from the Pauline Allen

235
00:27:09.200 --> 00:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>book on Severus of Antioch. Texts four Severus essentially says,

236
00:27:14.960 --> 00:27:19.039
<v Speaker 1>in his defense of Saint Curle talking about dividing quote

237
00:27:19.079 --> 00:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>unquote divide in Christ's actions and attributing the divine wants

238
00:27:23.039 --> 00:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the divinity, he says that he actually didn't mean it.

239
00:27:26.160 --> 00:27:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding. He says, oh, he didn't mean it.

240
00:27:30.240 --> 00:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>He just made them anathematized their positions, and then he said, oh,

241
00:27:34.200 --> 00:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>he just let them praddle on like stupid kids. And

242
00:27:37.359 --> 00:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>he didn't actually mean it when he said that, which

243
00:27:40.240 --> 00:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is again an example of rationalization in our view, and

244
00:27:45.279 --> 00:27:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it has really bad implications on Saint Krole's view. I mean,

245
00:27:48.359 --> 00:27:50.519
<v Speaker 1>if Saint kil didn't really mean what he said, doesn't

246
00:27:50.559 --> 00:27:55.319
<v Speaker 1>that mean that he's fine with nestorianizing ideas. Will't that

247
00:27:55.440 --> 00:27:58.319
<v Speaker 1>imply that he will be fine in Kalkadon because he

248
00:27:58.359 --> 00:28:00.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean what he said. Again, this has bad implications

249
00:28:00.799 --> 00:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for him. Another big issue they have is that kal

250
00:28:04.799 --> 00:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Kadon accepted EBAs and Theodorit, which are two historian sympathizers. Now,

251
00:28:11.279 --> 00:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>in terms of theodor It, if you actually read his

252
00:28:13.200 --> 00:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>book Eeronistas, which was composed in four forty seven, there

253
00:28:16.680 --> 00:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are numerous things that he says in Aeronistas, which is

254
00:28:19.039 --> 00:28:21.279
<v Speaker 1>actually the things that Saint kill says. I'm not going

255
00:28:21.319 --> 00:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to go over them, but you could. But again, I'll

256
00:28:23.480 --> 00:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>deal with those things and with Ibas. He has a

257
00:28:26.960 --> 00:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>bad letter about how he doesn't like Saint Kyle, but

258
00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really speak of theology. Not to mention, his

259
00:28:34.279 --> 00:28:37.599
<v Speaker 1>acceptance was based on a reversal of the Council of

260
00:28:37.680 --> 00:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Ephesus too, so it was based on reversing the effects

261
00:28:40.480 --> 00:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Second Ficiene Council, which kal Kadan was based on.

262
00:28:44.640 --> 00:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And not to mention again, his letter where he was

263
00:28:47.039 --> 00:28:49.799
<v Speaker 1>condemning Saint Kilt was written for thirty three, back when

264
00:28:49.839 --> 00:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he was a priest, not when he was a bishop,

265
00:28:52.680 --> 00:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>back when Saint Kyle himself was alive and there's another

266
00:28:57.839 --> 00:29:00.039
<v Speaker 1>example of word concept faucy Jay. They will say a

267
00:29:00.720 --> 00:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Hisstorius accepted the Kalakdonian Council. He said, oh, I believe

268
00:29:05.240 --> 00:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same thing, which is funny. I mentioned this

269
00:29:07.799 --> 00:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in the video. Arius does the same thing. It's the

270
00:29:10.480 --> 00:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Council of Nicea. Ten years later, yes, he says, I

271
00:29:14.400 --> 00:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>accept the Council of Nicea.

272
00:29:16.720 --> 00:29:19.519
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, that was a great point that you made.

273
00:29:19.599 --> 00:29:22.960
<v Speaker 9>I mean, just because someone claims to accept something, that

274
00:29:23.079 --> 00:29:26.680
<v Speaker 9>doesn't mean that the council is therefore erroneous. I mean,

275
00:29:26.720 --> 00:29:30.079
<v Speaker 9>that's a ridiculous argument. And by the way, Basil in

276
00:29:30.160 --> 00:29:33.839
<v Speaker 9>his writings is constantly having to deal with the word

277
00:29:33.880 --> 00:29:36.599
<v Speaker 9>concept fallacy. We deal with it constantly as well, with

278
00:29:36.799 --> 00:29:39.720
<v Speaker 9>idiots like Jonathan Hill, who will say that because the

279
00:29:39.839 --> 00:29:42.440
<v Speaker 9>term natural theology is used in Saint Maximus, therefore he

280
00:29:42.559 --> 00:29:46.000
<v Speaker 9>means natural theology in the tonistic sense, which is ridiculous.

281
00:29:46.319 --> 00:29:52.079
<v Speaker 9>And Bradshaw has entire sections refuting that notion. Again, Father

282
00:29:52.160 --> 00:29:55.599
<v Speaker 9>Stanieloy has entire sections refuting the notion that we believe

283
00:29:55.640 --> 00:29:58.920
<v Speaker 9>in in the tonistic version of natural theology. So again,

284
00:29:59.039 --> 00:30:01.559
<v Speaker 9>word concept fallas he is at the root. It's a

285
00:30:01.720 --> 00:30:08.079
<v Speaker 9>central problem here in this debate with the Nonchalcedonians because

286
00:30:08.079 --> 00:30:11.119
<v Speaker 9>they're married, on the one hand to the phraseology of

287
00:30:11.720 --> 00:30:15.799
<v Speaker 9>Saint Cyril, when Saint Cyril was himself not married to

288
00:30:16.160 --> 00:30:19.480
<v Speaker 9>one definitional sense of this terminology. This is the problem

289
00:30:19.559 --> 00:30:21.359
<v Speaker 9>with all of these heretics and all these people who

290
00:30:21.640 --> 00:30:25.000
<v Speaker 9>don't have any ability to understand nuance is that they

291
00:30:25.079 --> 00:30:28.680
<v Speaker 9>try to squish everything into a one dimensional notion. And

292
00:30:28.759 --> 00:30:31.559
<v Speaker 9>once they do that, in their minds, they think they've

293
00:30:31.599 --> 00:30:34.799
<v Speaker 9>got some kind of key to refuting everyone else, but

294
00:30:35.000 --> 00:30:36.680
<v Speaker 9>it just actually makes them look ridiculous.

295
00:30:38.200 --> 00:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention, it's the same Jonathan Hill that sided

296
00:30:40.759 --> 00:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it to coptics.

297
00:30:42.119 --> 00:30:45.240
<v Speaker 9>Right, Yeah, he'll sign with coptics. He'll find anybody who's

298
00:30:45.279 --> 00:30:48.079
<v Speaker 9>in a disagreement with us to try to find common cause,

299
00:30:48.440 --> 00:30:51.319
<v Speaker 9>because he's psychotic by the way, he's bipolar and he's

300
00:30:51.319 --> 00:30:51.759
<v Speaker 9>on meds.

301
00:30:53.599 --> 00:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And not to mention, to prove that Sanco wasn't married

302
00:30:57.519 --> 00:31:00.759
<v Speaker 1>to one phraseology, there's letter fifty three. There's his statement

303
00:31:00.759 --> 00:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>on Gleffire on the Pentitiic. But letter fifty three is

304
00:31:03.119 --> 00:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>very insightful because he says Christ is in and out

305
00:31:07.480 --> 00:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of two natures. So he says exactly what Pope Saint

306
00:31:10.039 --> 00:31:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Agatos says two centuries later, who also says that Christ

307
00:31:13.720 --> 00:31:16.519
<v Speaker 1>is in and out of two natures, which is affirming

308
00:31:17.200 --> 00:31:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the both formulas. Right, both formulas at Saint curl Usus.

309
00:31:20.319 --> 00:31:25.519
<v Speaker 1>So we're actually not the devices, we're actually accepting the

310
00:31:25.559 --> 00:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>correct interpretation of both formulas. Really, the main debate is

311
00:31:29.119 --> 00:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>rejection of the Diophysite formula, which is by the way, patristic.

312
00:31:33.079 --> 00:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is again as I proved Timothy the student

313
00:31:37.519 --> 00:31:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of Apollinarias himself amidst this and another objection I've seen,

314
00:31:43.759 --> 00:31:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is a silly objection. The word

315
00:31:46.960 --> 00:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>hypostatic union was not used in the Council of calcadan

316
00:31:50.000 --> 00:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Therefore Calcadonis don't believe in hypostatic union. I mean, can

317
00:31:53.240 --> 00:31:54.039
<v Speaker 1>you really believe this?

318
00:31:54.240 --> 00:31:58.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, this is so many stupid arguments. I mean, it's

319
00:31:58.240 --> 00:32:01.960
<v Speaker 9>like you had some really good comebacks on this point

320
00:32:02.000 --> 00:32:03.839
<v Speaker 9>in your videos. By the way, I think that was

321
00:32:03.920 --> 00:32:05.279
<v Speaker 9>solid argumentation. Absolutely.

322
00:32:06.519 --> 00:32:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And it also shows right like the way people

323
00:32:09.799 --> 00:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>defending Kalkadon, it's not like they didn't appeal to a

324
00:32:13.000 --> 00:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>certain patriarch. They defended it's on the grounds of its theology,

325
00:32:16.480 --> 00:32:18.559
<v Speaker 1>which is very important now I want to talk about.

326
00:32:18.640 --> 00:32:20.759
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of like the basic issues in the

327
00:32:21.160 --> 00:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Coptic Church. I've gone when I'm talking about the responses.

328
00:32:26.079 --> 00:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't make up these responses, like I heard these

329
00:32:29.759 --> 00:32:34.279
<v Speaker 1>responses from other Coptic and Oriental Christians. So one response

330
00:32:34.359 --> 00:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I've heard is about unleavened bread, and I think you

331
00:32:37.720 --> 00:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>can explain this as well. So the Armenian Church uses

332
00:32:40.839 --> 00:32:44.319
<v Speaker 1>unleavened bread. The response I got, Jay is that, Oh,

333
00:32:44.400 --> 00:32:47.759
<v Speaker 1>it's merely a jurisdictional preference. It's not that big of

334
00:32:47.759 --> 00:32:49.759
<v Speaker 1>a deal. Can you explain to me, Jay, why that's

335
00:32:50.240 --> 00:32:52.559
<v Speaker 1>why it's not merely a jurisdictional preference, Why it's such

336
00:32:52.559 --> 00:32:53.039
<v Speaker 1>a big deal.

337
00:32:53.279 --> 00:32:56.039
<v Speaker 9>Well, the ancient Canon's actually forbid doing that, and it

338
00:32:56.079 --> 00:32:59.839
<v Speaker 9>would be a movement back to judaizing. It would be

339
00:32:59.839 --> 00:33:02.720
<v Speaker 9>a movement back to the Old Testament conceptions. That's the

340
00:33:02.839 --> 00:33:08.160
<v Speaker 9>reasoning why in the early Canons it's not that practice

341
00:33:08.279 --> 00:33:11.559
<v Speaker 9>is forbidden. So, and this is exactly why Armenians would

342
00:33:11.559 --> 00:33:13.640
<v Speaker 9>do things like sacrifice the chicken at the door of

343
00:33:13.720 --> 00:33:17.400
<v Speaker 9>the the church on whatever ceremony, because this is a

344
00:33:17.759 --> 00:33:20.160
<v Speaker 9>They're they're tempted with judaizing it. That's why.

345
00:33:21.559 --> 00:33:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's another objection I heard the cousin marriages and

346
00:33:25.640 --> 00:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Egyptian Church. The argument I heard was it's merely cultural,

347
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's okay. But I heard a good response from

348
00:33:33.519 --> 00:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>my friend Nick who said marriage is theological right. You

349
00:33:37.720 --> 00:33:41.519
<v Speaker 1>can't separate marriage and just make cultural marriage and theology like,

350
00:33:41.559 --> 00:33:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you can't separate these two. These are two intertwined things.

351
00:33:44.839 --> 00:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't really enough. But by the way, for

352
00:33:47.559 --> 00:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the audience, I mean, these aren't arguments that are like,

353
00:33:51.599 --> 00:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they won't really one hundred percent direly prough all this

354
00:33:54.319 --> 00:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>church is wrong. It just showcases certain problems. We'll get

355
00:33:58.640 --> 00:34:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to the real issues really soon. And it is the

356
00:34:01.440 --> 00:34:04.079
<v Speaker 1>circumcision in the Coptic Church. As a matter of fact,

357
00:34:04.079 --> 00:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at Florence Bull of the Union with

358
00:34:06.599 --> 00:34:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the Cops, this is their motivation for seeing that those

359
00:34:10.199 --> 00:34:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that are circumcised are damned because people in the Coptic

360
00:34:13.320 --> 00:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Church this circumcision. And as a response, the Roman Catholic

361
00:34:16.440 --> 00:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Church said, oh, you know, if you do a circumcision,

362
00:34:18.360 --> 00:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>you're damned. Bull of the Union with Cops, No.

363
00:34:21.840 --> 00:34:24.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean this was already condemned, and things like Trollo

364
00:34:24.119 --> 00:34:27.280
<v Speaker 9>and the Canons of Trollo. I mean this is already

365
00:34:27.519 --> 00:34:30.840
<v Speaker 9>was already condemned by us as well, exactly. I mean,

366
00:34:30.840 --> 00:34:33.679
<v Speaker 9>it's just ridiculous. How are you gonna go back to

367
00:34:33.760 --> 00:34:37.039
<v Speaker 9>these practices which the New Testament obviously forbids, the Ancient

368
00:34:37.119 --> 00:34:41.440
<v Speaker 9>Church forbids I mean obviously. And by the way, they

369
00:34:41.480 --> 00:34:44.280
<v Speaker 9>are a Chumenists. This is another point that is often

370
00:34:44.320 --> 00:34:47.039
<v Speaker 9>forgotten is that they will team up with Roman Catholics

371
00:34:47.079 --> 00:34:50.840
<v Speaker 9>against Orthodox. They will team up they all the time. Yeah,

372
00:34:51.199 --> 00:34:53.679
<v Speaker 9>so there, and they don't actually agree amongst themselves, these

373
00:34:54.440 --> 00:34:57.840
<v Speaker 9>oriental communions, but they'll team up against Us with people

374
00:34:57.880 --> 00:34:59.840
<v Speaker 9>who are far worse, like Roman Catholics.

375
00:35:01.000 --> 00:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I see this generally. I've seen multiple apologists just refusing. Now,

376
00:35:07.440 --> 00:35:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to their credit, I've seen certain people, one of them

377
00:35:10.639 --> 00:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>who I'm debating with, he actually does represent the position

378
00:35:14.079 --> 00:35:17.199
<v Speaker 1>faithfully and he does attack like Roman Catholics as well

379
00:35:17.280 --> 00:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Protestants too. But most of the people that I talked to,

380
00:35:21.559 --> 00:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they only focus on Orthodox. They don't even talk about

381
00:35:23.920 --> 00:35:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholics. They only focus on Orthodox. And this has

382
00:35:26.400 --> 00:35:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to be noted. There's like, really online, there's a lot

383
00:35:30.119 --> 00:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of Oriental groups and most of these are like Western converts,

384
00:35:34.920 --> 00:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they're most of them are caatic humans. And all they

385
00:35:38.480 --> 00:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>do is they're just trying to find like inquiries. The

386
00:35:41.480 --> 00:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox Church get them and just bombard them with all

387
00:35:45.119 --> 00:35:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kalkadon, this is a historian. Here's like, here's this,

388
00:35:48.880 --> 00:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this and this. Like you guys are an historian. You

389
00:35:51.000 --> 00:35:53.280
<v Speaker 1>should come to the true Church. And they do this

390
00:35:53.400 --> 00:35:57.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But that has to be noted to get

391
00:35:57.199 --> 00:35:59.039
<v Speaker 1>onto the real stuff. This is the this is the

392
00:35:59.119 --> 00:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>beautiful stuff theology. First, I would like to talk about terminology.

393
00:36:03.960 --> 00:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to dive much deeper into terminology in part one.

394
00:36:07.280 --> 00:36:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I kind of events like very basic. So one thing

395
00:36:10.639 --> 00:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we have to make sure, and I will avoid seeing

396
00:36:12.800 --> 00:36:15.559
<v Speaker 1>the word nature as much as I can unless I'm

397
00:36:15.599 --> 00:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>quoting someone, because for us, nature obviously means essence, right,

398
00:36:19.960 --> 00:36:24.039
<v Speaker 1>it means essence. For them it means hypostasis, and in

399
00:36:24.199 --> 00:36:27.599
<v Speaker 1>some cases it means essence as well, but only in

400
00:36:27.719 --> 00:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of Trinitarian theology. So in Severus's Letters sixty five,

401
00:36:32.960 --> 00:36:35.559
<v Speaker 1>he says that we use the name nature sometimes generally

402
00:36:35.639 --> 00:36:40.039
<v Speaker 1>of essence and sometimes specifically signifying the hypostasis of a man.

403
00:36:40.119 --> 00:36:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And he goes on so generally speaking, he uses nature

404
00:36:43.480 --> 00:36:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to mean essence in tridology, because the Cappadocians did this,

405
00:36:47.159 --> 00:36:49.559
<v Speaker 1>but in Christology he use a different scheme, he used

406
00:36:49.559 --> 00:36:55.079
<v Speaker 1>a different terminology, so we will be talking about that now.

407
00:36:55.159 --> 00:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Of course, hypostasis for them doesn't mean person necessarily, because

408
00:37:00.280 --> 00:37:05.119
<v Speaker 1>there are two types of hypostasis. Itself means a conchritization

409
00:37:05.239 --> 00:37:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of essence, and that's like the antique like Nicee language

410
00:37:09.320 --> 00:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that they inherit. There's two types of hypostasis. There's non

411
00:37:14.039 --> 00:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>self subsistent hypostasis, which is something that a hyperstat that

412
00:37:18.519 --> 00:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist on its own. So the example of this

413
00:37:21.039 --> 00:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>will be the body. The body without the soul doesn't exist, right,

414
00:37:24.400 --> 00:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so it needs to be in the union with the

415
00:37:26.400 --> 00:37:28.679
<v Speaker 1>soul in order to exist. And the soul in this

416
00:37:28.840 --> 00:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>example is self subsistent. It exists on its own, so

417
00:37:32.480 --> 00:37:35.519
<v Speaker 1>when it's separated from the body, the soul still exists, right,

418
00:37:36.039 --> 00:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>so it's self subsistence. So these things are very important

419
00:37:38.719 --> 00:37:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to note, and the body's soul analogy is very important

420
00:37:41.719 --> 00:37:47.519
<v Speaker 1>in dealing with christologies. It's key to this, and there's

421
00:37:47.559 --> 00:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a structural similarity for example, and the historians will essentially

422
00:37:53.559 --> 00:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>say that all hypostasis are self subsistent. So that's why,

423
00:37:57.079 --> 00:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>like when they're speaking of two natures and two hyper

424
00:37:59.760 --> 00:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>states and they're trying to make a union out of

425
00:38:02.800 --> 00:38:07.199
<v Speaker 1>two hypostasis, because they are self subsistent, it still leads

426
00:38:07.239 --> 00:38:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to two persons theology. Right, So this is like the

427
00:38:09.719 --> 00:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>basis of Saint CEUs argumentation is that you can't really

428
00:38:13.360 --> 00:38:16.159
<v Speaker 1>have a single personhood in a union of persons in

429
00:38:16.239 --> 00:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a prosopic union. For severs prosopone person will mean self

430
00:38:22.360 --> 00:38:27.159
<v Speaker 1>subsistent hypostasis because it exists on its own, and there's

431
00:38:27.159 --> 00:38:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a very common like so in their critological scheme, Christ

432
00:38:31.360 --> 00:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>is out of two hypostasis. There's a divine hypostasis, right,

433
00:38:35.480 --> 00:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that's self subsistent, and there's a non self substance in

434
00:38:37.960 --> 00:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>human hypostasis, even though normally a composite human hypostasis is

435
00:38:42.079 --> 00:38:46.559
<v Speaker 1>self subsistent. Because the human humanity of Christ doesn't exist

436
00:38:46.639 --> 00:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>outside of the union, it's non self subsistent. So it

437
00:38:51.519 --> 00:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>might this might raise a common question, a very simple question.

438
00:38:55.519 --> 00:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So Christ is out of two hypostasis and he's one hypostasis,

439
00:38:59.480 --> 00:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's doesn't that mean that he changed or doesn't

440
00:39:04.280 --> 00:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that mean that there's a fourth person in the trinity.

441
00:39:07.719 --> 00:39:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Actually no, it doesn't lead to.

442
00:39:09.239 --> 00:39:12.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, only if you mistake the notion of what nature

443
00:39:12.440 --> 00:39:14.880
<v Speaker 9>and hypostasis is. Yeah.

444
00:39:15.119 --> 00:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So the way they will defend it they will say, well,

445
00:39:18.880 --> 00:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>self subsistence is personhood, right, and so the humanity is

446
00:39:22.440 --> 00:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>now self subsistent. There's no personhood in his humanity, but

447
00:39:25.519 --> 00:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>his divinity is where his personhood is because that's self subsistent.

448
00:39:30.880 --> 00:39:33.079
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how they can still defend that Christ

449
00:39:33.239 --> 00:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is still a divine person. But there is indeed a

450
00:39:37.039 --> 00:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. And there's two problems. Actually. Number one

451
00:39:41.159 --> 00:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>is that this kind of subverts triological language. So from

452
00:39:44.400 --> 00:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one nature three hypostasis, it becomes one ussi and three

453
00:39:47.519 --> 00:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>prosopa in order to defend like the divine personhoods in

454
00:39:52.119 --> 00:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the trinity. But also remember the soul is self subsistence.

455
00:39:58.000 --> 00:40:00.679
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is something that Josephair talks about

456
00:40:00.719 --> 00:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot in his book Got issued Out. He asked

457
00:40:03.400 --> 00:40:06.559
<v Speaker 1>this question like three four times in his book, and

458
00:40:06.719 --> 00:40:09.679
<v Speaker 1>he asks, what is you know is soul and hype?

459
00:40:09.880 --> 00:40:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Are they synonymous or are they distinct? The reason why

460
00:40:13.199 --> 00:40:18.159
<v Speaker 1>he's asking against the soul is self subsistent and it's

461
00:40:18.360 --> 00:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>union with the union with the body, and the soul

462
00:40:21.199 --> 00:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>will presuppose will mean that the soul will mean the personhood.

463
00:40:24.360 --> 00:40:28.079
<v Speaker 1>So will this lead to a direction of pollinarianism is

464
00:40:28.119 --> 00:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>an argument that Joseph fairly is and I think if

465
00:40:30.440 --> 00:40:36.199
<v Speaker 1>you are to defend Christ's personhood, Christ's divine personhood, then

466
00:40:36.320 --> 00:40:38.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily in that same system, it will also lead that

467
00:40:39.559 --> 00:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that personhood is a faculty of the soul as well

468
00:40:42.119 --> 00:40:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in that system, and that will lead to some sort

469
00:40:44.119 --> 00:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of pollinarianism, not exactly, but but the same mistakes that

470
00:40:48.559 --> 00:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>pollinarius makes. So this will be like the basic problems

471
00:40:54.519 --> 00:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that Sever's faces in Christoche. Do you have anything to add?

472
00:40:57.599 --> 00:40:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Or should I move on?

473
00:40:59.360 --> 00:41:01.320
<v Speaker 9>Now? You can go ahead, okay.

474
00:41:02.199 --> 00:41:05.039
<v Speaker 1>So there are also other arguments, some of these I

475
00:41:05.159 --> 00:41:08.519
<v Speaker 1>already used. This one is from the aunties of Jerusalem.

476
00:41:09.599 --> 00:41:14.079
<v Speaker 1>So or the distinct formulas that we have is that

477
00:41:14.159 --> 00:41:17.079
<v Speaker 1>we say the crisis into natures and out of two natures,

478
00:41:17.159 --> 00:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>out of two natures signifying the singleness of his personhood,

479
00:41:21.159 --> 00:41:25.159
<v Speaker 1>into natures signifying the duality of his essence, duality of

480
00:41:25.280 --> 00:41:30.159
<v Speaker 1>his essence's, duality of his energies, right, duality of his wills.

481
00:41:31.360 --> 00:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So these are the two formulas that we use that

482
00:41:34.639 --> 00:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>are in perfect conjunction with other one another. Now the

483
00:41:37.880 --> 00:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Orientals they reject it into Nature's formula. For them, it

484
00:41:40.920 --> 00:41:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is an historian formula because to say into natures, for them,

485
00:41:45.039 --> 00:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>nature means hypostasis. So that means, oh, you mean into hypostasis.

486
00:41:50.719 --> 00:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Someone might ask, well, what if they said nature meant essence.

487
00:41:54.920 --> 00:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>We will get to that because that actually happens and

488
00:41:57.440 --> 00:42:02.159
<v Speaker 1>we will see how servers responds to that. But there's

489
00:42:02.159 --> 00:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a common argument here is if Christ is out of

490
00:42:05.960 --> 00:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>out of two natures, out of the hypostasis, but he's

491
00:42:09.440 --> 00:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>not into natures. But at the same time, the natures

492
00:42:12.960 --> 00:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>are not mixed, and they're not confused, and they're distinct. Right,

493
00:42:16.039 --> 00:42:19.039
<v Speaker 1>So after the Union service will speak of them being

494
00:42:21.519 --> 00:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll speak a lot prieties. So what propriety is. It's

495
00:42:25.000 --> 00:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of distinct from property. It's the color of prices,

496
00:42:27.920 --> 00:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like eye color is a propriety of the human hypostasis.

497
00:42:31.320 --> 00:42:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Heights eith right, these are like natural qualities.

498
00:42:34.800 --> 00:42:36.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, what what you see here is also similar. I

499
00:42:36.960 --> 00:42:39.400
<v Speaker 9>want to stress too to the tendency of a pollinarianism,

500
00:42:39.480 --> 00:42:42.519
<v Speaker 9>which what a pollinarism and a pollinarianism did was to

501
00:42:42.800 --> 00:42:47.519
<v Speaker 9>mistake characteristics of what are proper to human nature, different

502
00:42:47.639 --> 00:42:50.920
<v Speaker 9>features and faculties or properties of human nature, to mistake

503
00:42:51.079 --> 00:42:55.239
<v Speaker 9>that for what hypostasis is. Hypostasis is also not just

504
00:42:55.440 --> 00:42:58.599
<v Speaker 9>the combination of all of the characteristics of human nature.

505
00:42:58.719 --> 00:43:01.599
<v Speaker 9>So the nature person distinction is crucial here. As Saint

506
00:43:01.679 --> 00:43:05.280
<v Speaker 9>John Damascus says, all heretics result from a failure to

507
00:43:05.639 --> 00:43:09.159
<v Speaker 9>distinguish between nature and person. All of the heresies, all

508
00:43:09.199 --> 00:43:11.320
<v Speaker 9>the trinitarian all the Christological heresies are based on this,

509
00:43:11.400 --> 00:43:13.639
<v Speaker 9>which is based on dialectics. And we're going to see

510
00:43:13.679 --> 00:43:15.960
<v Speaker 9>that dialectical tension in most of these guys that we

511
00:43:16.079 --> 00:43:19.800
<v Speaker 9>talk about, especially Severus with his dialectical usage of Aristotle.

512
00:43:19.880 --> 00:43:22.480
<v Speaker 9>But what I wanted to distress is just that there's

513
00:43:22.519 --> 00:43:28.119
<v Speaker 9>an important distinction between the characteristic properties of a nature

514
00:43:28.559 --> 00:43:31.320
<v Speaker 9>and what a hypostasis is. And this is this mistake

515
00:43:31.400 --> 00:43:35.039
<v Speaker 9>that many many people make, including people in Orthodox circles

516
00:43:35.079 --> 00:43:37.400
<v Speaker 9>as well, who just simply aren't studied on this or

517
00:43:37.440 --> 00:43:40.679
<v Speaker 9>don't know the nuances of this topic. And it's very nuanced.

518
00:43:42.679 --> 00:43:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So the main argument here from Leontius, I'll cut it short,

519
00:43:46.679 --> 00:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is so you say Cristi is out of two natures.

520
00:43:49.079 --> 00:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, that's good. But you say that his natures

521
00:43:52.480 --> 00:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are also distinct even after the union, and Severance will say, yes,

522
00:43:55.519 --> 00:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of course they're different, right, they're different. Right, his humanity

523
00:43:58.960 --> 00:44:03.079
<v Speaker 1>is different from his divinion. But then the obvious objection

524
00:44:03.199 --> 00:44:06.280
<v Speaker 1>here will be so they are distinct, but doesn't distinction

525
00:44:06.519 --> 00:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>mean multiplicity. Shouldn't that mean that after the unit there's

526
00:44:10.519 --> 00:44:16.639
<v Speaker 1>still two natures? And this and again if the problem

527
00:44:16.760 --> 00:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>here is that severis want's unity of nature, unity of

528
00:44:20.480 --> 00:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>hypostasis out of two hypostasis. But the problem is, again,

529
00:44:24.360 --> 00:44:26.039
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to try to say that they're distinct

530
00:44:26.119 --> 00:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>even after their synthesis, even after the union, the problem

531
00:44:30.079 --> 00:44:34.079
<v Speaker 1>is distinction implies multiplicity. It doesn't mean imply division. It doesn't.

532
00:44:34.440 --> 00:44:36.199
<v Speaker 1>In there view it does. But in our view we

533
00:44:36.280 --> 00:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>will say it doesn't imply division. But it still has

534
00:44:39.960 --> 00:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to be distinct. And if it is distinct, if it

535
00:44:42.360 --> 00:44:44.679
<v Speaker 1>is distinct, then there needs to be two natures even

536
00:44:44.719 --> 00:44:47.679
<v Speaker 1>in that logic. And this is actually the argument the

537
00:44:47.760 --> 00:44:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Answer to Jerusalem uses in his book against the Monophysites,

538
00:44:52.079 --> 00:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>where he tries to argue, well, you know, you still

539
00:44:54.400 --> 00:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>should be arguing for two natures, because this is the

540
00:44:56.840 --> 00:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>lat logical conclusion and a debates which we will get

541
00:45:00.119 --> 00:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>on later. But the debates that Servis has with Julian

542
00:45:02.760 --> 00:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of holocarnosis is actually very much based on this question.

543
00:45:06.679 --> 00:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very much based on whether distinction causes multiplicity or not.

544
00:45:11.800 --> 00:45:17.320
<v Speaker 1>There's another proof of service of Antioch, meaning of Sarahciantich

545
00:45:17.400 --> 00:45:22.039
<v Speaker 1>believing that distinction implies division, and that is letter letter two,

546
00:45:22.400 --> 00:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Letters twenty two and twenty three. I will focus on

547
00:45:26.440 --> 00:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>letter letter twenty three in this instance. But he says

548
00:45:31.559 --> 00:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in this letter that that there is a holy Trinity

549
00:45:36.199 --> 00:45:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that is divided and distinct in hypostasis, but it is

550
00:45:39.719 --> 00:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not divided in one essence. So what he's trying to

551
00:45:42.079 --> 00:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>say here is that he's really trying to protect the

552
00:45:44.400 --> 00:45:50.320
<v Speaker 1>capitolciin theology. But because he believes distinction implies division and composition,

553
00:45:51.400 --> 00:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>something we talk about all the time, he has to

554
00:45:54.320 --> 00:45:57.199
<v Speaker 1>say that the hypostasis are divided in the Trinity, and

555
00:45:58.000 --> 00:46:00.639
<v Speaker 1>we won't say that he's willingly being tried to we don't.

556
00:46:00.760 --> 00:46:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think his intention is triteistic, but nevertheless it

557
00:46:07.360 --> 00:46:11.639
<v Speaker 1>may lead to triteism. It does anticipate triteism in his

558
00:46:12.000 --> 00:46:16.119
<v Speaker 1>in his theology, if you actually understand the implications of

559
00:46:16.159 --> 00:46:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the hyposthesis being divided. But but what I wanna, what

560
00:46:20.719 --> 00:46:22.519
<v Speaker 1>I want to focus on again is that for him,

561
00:46:22.559 --> 00:46:25.840
<v Speaker 1>distinction implies division. Now to get onto the debate that

562
00:46:25.920 --> 00:46:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he had with Julian of Holycarnossus. This is very important

563
00:46:28.800 --> 00:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because Julian is an Aftartodocetist. He believes that Christ's humanity

564
00:46:35.639 --> 00:46:39.199
<v Speaker 1>was impassable along with his divinity, and he believes that

565
00:46:39.360 --> 00:46:43.679
<v Speaker 1>the natures had a non different difference. So in greet

566
00:46:43.719 --> 00:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this withs so he says, oh, you know, the humanity,

567
00:46:49.199 --> 00:46:52.079
<v Speaker 1>they are distinct, but at the same time they're not really.

568
00:46:52.880 --> 00:46:53.199
<v Speaker 4>And his.

569
00:46:55.079 --> 00:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Argument was that if this his argument, he understood that

570
00:46:59.880 --> 00:47:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the distinction implied division, and he understood in the Severian

571
00:47:03.360 --> 00:47:07.039
<v Speaker 1>system that Christ had distinct conditions. Right in his humanity

572
00:47:07.519 --> 00:47:11.079
<v Speaker 1>he was passable, but in his divinity it's impassable. Right,

573
00:47:11.119 --> 00:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's two distinct conditions that Christ has, and so

574
00:47:15.159 --> 00:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that, well, this necessarily means that the properties

575
00:47:18.719 --> 00:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are divided because they're distinct, and that will lead to

576
00:47:22.719 --> 00:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>division of natures and persons, which leads to Nestorianism. And

577
00:47:27.119 --> 00:47:30.840
<v Speaker 1>then this is the rationale that Julian has in accusing

578
00:47:30.920 --> 00:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Servers of Nestorianism ultimately, because Severus is trying to be

579
00:47:35.599 --> 00:47:39.079
<v Speaker 1>ortholox in his system by saying that Christ is passable

580
00:47:39.119 --> 00:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>in his humanity. But ultimately Julian actually tries to be

581
00:47:42.360 --> 00:47:45.599
<v Speaker 1>consistent with that system, and he says, no, actually, that

582
00:47:45.719 --> 00:47:48.559
<v Speaker 1>is not possible, because if there's a distinction, that means division,

583
00:47:48.639 --> 00:47:51.199
<v Speaker 1>that means there's a division that means there's a duality

584
00:47:51.840 --> 00:47:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in Christ. That means there are two natures in Christ.

585
00:47:54.360 --> 00:47:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And we can't accept that.

586
00:47:57.079 --> 00:47:57.760
<v Speaker 2>And so this is.

587
00:47:59.239 --> 00:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>An example of a debate that he has. I think

588
00:48:02.559 --> 00:48:05.639
<v Speaker 1>we will get onto that if I'm certain, yes, we

589
00:48:05.679 --> 00:48:08.400
<v Speaker 1>will get onto that debate later when we're talking about energies.

590
00:48:09.480 --> 00:48:13.159
<v Speaker 1>This is text eleven in the Service of Antioch book

591
00:48:13.239 --> 00:48:15.840
<v Speaker 1>by Pauline Allen. This is text eleven, so you can

592
00:48:15.920 --> 00:48:18.199
<v Speaker 1>go read there for yourself. I'm not making this stuff up.

593
00:48:19.239 --> 00:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I read the text. I know what they're talking about.

594
00:48:21.519 --> 00:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Now there's another debate that is important, and this is

595
00:48:26.519 --> 00:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>relevant too, into nature's meaning into essences. So there's John

596
00:48:32.760 --> 00:48:36.880
<v Speaker 1>de Gramarian. He is what we will call it Curic Calcadonian.

597
00:48:36.960 --> 00:48:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So he's one of the first curly Caulcadonian theologians in

598
00:48:41.599 --> 00:48:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the scene, and he defends Kalkadon and he he he.

599
00:48:44.719 --> 00:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>The theology that he proposes is the theology, generally speaking,

600
00:48:48.320 --> 00:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that we used today. He's different from the person of

601
00:48:52.039 --> 00:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>John Philipponos, by the way, who's a different person. They're not.

602
00:48:55.119 --> 00:48:57.840
<v Speaker 1>They both call John de Gramarian, But this John de

603
00:48:57.880 --> 00:49:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Gremarian is not the same as the philosopher John Philipponos.

604
00:49:02.639 --> 00:49:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So this debate is very insightful because John the Gramarian

605
00:49:06.360 --> 00:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>has a very simple argument. His argument is essentially basically this.

606
00:49:11.119 --> 00:49:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Look.

607
00:49:11.920 --> 00:49:14.880
<v Speaker 1>All we did in the Council of Kalkadon is that

608
00:49:14.960 --> 00:49:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we have the Capitolcian trinitarian terminology right where nature means essence,

609
00:49:19.920 --> 00:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>hypostasis means person. Right, we have this trinitarian terminology with us.

610
00:49:25.559 --> 00:49:29.880
<v Speaker 1>All we did is apply that terminology to Christology. And

611
00:49:30.039 --> 00:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>so when we say into natures, the only thing we're

612
00:49:33.880 --> 00:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>really saying is that Christ is into essences. That's really

613
00:49:38.280 --> 00:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying. And so since you too also believe

614
00:49:42.400 --> 00:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that Christ is into essences, you uhoually accept Kalkadon. I mean,

615
00:49:46.480 --> 00:49:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the argument is very simple, and this is also vindicated

616
00:49:49.199 --> 00:49:52.559
<v Speaker 1>because we just spoke about this. Sat Leo also form

617
00:49:52.840 --> 00:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning essence, right, so this vindicates Saint Leo as well.

618
00:49:59.119 --> 00:50:03.159
<v Speaker 1>So Severus has two options here. He either says he

619
00:50:03.199 --> 00:50:06.199
<v Speaker 1>either accepts the argument of John the Grammarian and he says, well,

620
00:50:06.400 --> 00:50:09.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it means two essences, then I guess

621
00:50:09.559 --> 00:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you guys are right. I guess you guys are really

622
00:50:11.440 --> 00:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not that different from us. Or he can reject it.

623
00:50:15.599 --> 00:50:17.679
<v Speaker 1>And as a matter of fact, what he does is

624
00:50:17.760 --> 00:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>he precisely does that. He precisely rejects into Nature's to

625
00:50:21.800 --> 00:50:24.599
<v Speaker 1>mean into essences. And so this will go to everyone

626
00:50:24.800 --> 00:50:28.039
<v Speaker 1>who thinks that Orientals have the same theology with us.

627
00:50:28.280 --> 00:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Severus had the possibility to speak of into essences in Christ,

628
00:50:33.559 --> 00:50:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so basically have vv of the into nature's formula. And

629
00:50:36.000 --> 00:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he explicitly rejects this. This is in the third letter

630
00:50:41.039 --> 00:50:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in Against the Grammarian. You can find this also in

631
00:50:43.480 --> 00:50:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Paulin Allen book on Serrus of Antioch. I believe

632
00:50:47.440 --> 00:50:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this was text. I believe this was text eight, but

633
00:50:52.559 --> 00:50:54.559
<v Speaker 1>don't quote me on that. I'm not one hundred percent

634
00:50:54.599 --> 00:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to certain. But there's arguments. Okay, does he come to

635
00:51:00.880 --> 00:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion that into nature's means to a heretical conclusion. Well,

636
00:51:04.760 --> 00:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>his argument, it shows showcases his inverse order theologist. So

637
00:51:09.480 --> 00:51:12.639
<v Speaker 1>he says, we understand substance, we understand essence to mean

638
00:51:13.159 --> 00:51:18.599
<v Speaker 1>a compendium of hypostasis. So if in Christ two essences

639
00:51:18.679 --> 00:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>were united, then the problem is that these two abstract

640
00:51:25.079 --> 00:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>essences were united, meaning that the entirety of the Trinity

641
00:51:28.639 --> 00:51:32.159
<v Speaker 1>and entirety of humanity was incarnated. This is nonsense. So

642
00:51:32.239 --> 00:51:35.159
<v Speaker 1>this is the argument that Serrus gives. The funny thing

643
00:51:35.199 --> 00:51:38.599
<v Speaker 1>about this argument is that Nestorius uses the same exact

644
00:51:38.840 --> 00:51:44.480
<v Speaker 1>argument against Saint curl. Saint Curyle says that God the

645
00:51:44.559 --> 00:51:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Word assumed assumed flesh. Then we find the exact part

646
00:51:48.280 --> 00:51:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this's answers. If God the Word became flesh, then all

647
00:51:51.480 --> 00:51:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity must have become flesh, since the trinity is

648
00:51:54.360 --> 00:51:57.119
<v Speaker 1>bound together as one nature. So this is the exact argument,

649
00:51:57.159 --> 00:51:59.559
<v Speaker 1>and he means nature to mean essence. He used the

650
00:51:59.599 --> 00:52:03.800
<v Speaker 1>same argument as in the story use did a century ago.

651
00:52:05.119 --> 00:52:09.599
<v Speaker 1>And again this showcase the inverse or the theology, because

652
00:52:09.599 --> 00:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they because you can only come to this conclusion that

653
00:52:12.719 --> 00:52:15.360
<v Speaker 1>these abstract essences are united. In our view, if you

654
00:52:15.440 --> 00:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>start your theology with essence. Now, how now, what will

655
00:52:18.519 --> 00:52:21.599
<v Speaker 1>be our response, What will we say if we came

656
00:52:21.679 --> 00:52:26.039
<v Speaker 1>with this objection, we will say Christ possessed the fullness

657
00:52:26.079 --> 00:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of the divine essence, but that doesn't mean that when

658
00:52:30.039 --> 00:52:32.519
<v Speaker 1>he entered into a specific mode of being, that doesn't

659
00:52:32.559 --> 00:52:35.360
<v Speaker 1>mean that the Trinity also entered into that specific mode

660
00:52:35.400 --> 00:52:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of being. So he possesses the fullness of the human essence,

661
00:52:38.679 --> 00:52:42.559
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that when he does something, when

662
00:52:42.599 --> 00:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>he in terms of the mode of being the Trinity,

663
00:52:44.360 --> 00:52:47.079
<v Speaker 1>it also goes along the same with humanity. So two

664
00:52:47.239 --> 00:52:51.039
<v Speaker 1>nature's two essences can come into unity, but it doesn't

665
00:52:51.079 --> 00:52:54.119
<v Speaker 1>affect the rest of the hypostasis in the sense that

666
00:52:54.159 --> 00:52:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the hype states don't become hyposthetically incarnated

667
00:52:58.159 --> 00:53:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with Christ. But this is a very i think, very

668
00:53:02.719 --> 00:53:06.960
<v Speaker 1>basic level mistake that Service makes, and again not many

669
00:53:07.039 --> 00:53:09.800
<v Speaker 1>people really talk about this. And this is the one

670
00:53:10.159 --> 00:53:15.679
<v Speaker 1>chance that anti Koncaddians had in trying to understand orteology,

671
00:53:15.840 --> 00:53:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and they completely rejected this. And so for all the

672
00:53:19.159 --> 00:53:22.960
<v Speaker 1>humanists on both sides, this completely on both sides, This

673
00:53:23.159 --> 00:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>completely refutes the project that some people are trying to go.

674
00:53:29.000 --> 00:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any comments, Jay, or should I move

675
00:53:31.320 --> 00:53:36.679
<v Speaker 1>on to a mistake service makes about humanity being an energy.

676
00:53:39.000 --> 00:53:41.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean again, we're going to see the constant

677
00:53:41.960 --> 00:53:47.920
<v Speaker 9>pattern of mistaking and characteristical properties of nature. So for us, body, mind, soul, will,

678
00:53:48.239 --> 00:53:52.480
<v Speaker 9>and energy is the signifier or operation proper to a

679
00:53:52.559 --> 00:53:56.320
<v Speaker 9>certain nature. So when a nature acts, we can know

680
00:53:56.480 --> 00:53:58.880
<v Speaker 9>it by its energy. St Basils. So, for example, when

681
00:53:58.920 --> 00:54:02.519
<v Speaker 9>Basil argues for the full divinity of the spirit, he

682
00:54:02.599 --> 00:54:04.199
<v Speaker 9>does so on the basis of the fact that the

683
00:54:04.239 --> 00:54:06.880
<v Speaker 9>spirit has the same uncreated energy as the Father and

684
00:54:06.960 --> 00:54:10.280
<v Speaker 9>the Son. Anybody who's read Basil's works knows that that

685
00:54:10.440 --> 00:54:13.760
<v Speaker 9>was a central key argument as to how he proved

686
00:54:13.800 --> 00:54:16.800
<v Speaker 9>the full divinity of the spirit. So we're going to

687
00:54:16.840 --> 00:54:19.599
<v Speaker 9>see this same pattern and Epizzol thirty eight at Basil,

688
00:54:19.639 --> 00:54:23.400
<v Speaker 9>I would add, is very crucial to understand. I'm not

689
00:54:23.480 --> 00:54:26.400
<v Speaker 9>just saying for you before this whole debate, because it's

690
00:54:26.440 --> 00:54:29.159
<v Speaker 9>Saint Basil and the Cappadocians who will take us in

691
00:54:29.320 --> 00:54:33.960
<v Speaker 9>the direction that the later fathers at Chalcedon at Ephesus

692
00:54:34.559 --> 00:54:37.159
<v Speaker 9>it should be at Ephysis Calcedon, and constant num one

693
00:54:37.199 --> 00:54:40.440
<v Speaker 9>and two it should be two and three. They will

694
00:54:40.719 --> 00:54:43.960
<v Speaker 9>build on this theology. So our theology is going in

695
00:54:44.320 --> 00:54:50.440
<v Speaker 9>a consistent direction, where nature person will, the properties of

696
00:54:50.599 --> 00:54:55.320
<v Speaker 9>nature that apply to human nature, body, mind, soul will,

697
00:54:56.360 --> 00:55:01.079
<v Speaker 9>those terms will become very precise and cons In archeology,

698
00:55:01.320 --> 00:55:05.320
<v Speaker 9>energy will be very consistent. Right, Basil will argue the

699
00:55:05.400 --> 00:55:08.360
<v Speaker 9>same thing against Eunomius. I just want to stress that

700
00:55:08.559 --> 00:55:11.880
<v Speaker 9>for us, the Cappadocians are crucial here, and I think

701
00:55:11.920 --> 00:55:14.840
<v Speaker 9>that it's it's very important that even though Severus and

702
00:55:14.920 --> 00:55:18.360
<v Speaker 9>certain people will cite the Cave dooceans, I don't think

703
00:55:18.400 --> 00:55:20.639
<v Speaker 9>that they really do them justice. And some of the

704
00:55:21.000 --> 00:55:23.480
<v Speaker 9>Orientals even seem to question the cave doceans, don't they.

705
00:55:25.199 --> 00:55:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a I'm not going to name the website,

706
00:55:27.639 --> 00:55:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's an Oriental website that refers to like heresies

707
00:55:31.480 --> 00:55:33.599
<v Speaker 1>to be refuted. And one of the here sees that

708
00:55:33.760 --> 00:55:37.639
<v Speaker 1>we have is essence energy's distinction, So they think that

709
00:55:37.800 --> 00:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>essence entity. Like, there's one website that is coming up

710
00:55:41.000 --> 00:55:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that's a coptic website refers to essenti's distinction as heretical.

711
00:55:47.159 --> 00:55:50.679
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, there are some people that do that. A

712
00:55:50.760 --> 00:55:53.519
<v Speaker 1>response I got that was good is apparently Severus in

713
00:55:53.639 --> 00:56:00.039
<v Speaker 1>some instances does apparently distinguish essence and energies. But we

714
00:56:00.079 --> 00:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>will actually get something relevant to that later like right now.

715
00:56:03.519 --> 00:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>But again, the significance of this debate that he had

716
00:56:08.559 --> 00:56:11.199
<v Speaker 1>with John de Gramarion is that a lot of the

717
00:56:11.320 --> 00:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>arguments John de Gramayon used was really talking about the

718
00:56:15.480 --> 00:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Cappadocian fathers, right. He used the Cappadocian fathers and used

719
00:56:19.960 --> 00:56:23.400
<v Speaker 1>him in a Calcadonian way in order to debate against Severus.

720
00:56:23.480 --> 00:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think I don't know if it's this letter

721
00:56:26.960 --> 00:56:30.280
<v Speaker 1>or a previous letter against John de Gramarion, but I

722
00:56:30.400 --> 00:56:34.360
<v Speaker 1>think Severus refers to him as a as a Nestorian

723
00:56:34.480 --> 00:56:38.679
<v Speaker 1>atheist Jew. I don't remember like what exact terminology he used,

724
00:56:38.760 --> 00:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but he like threw a lot of insults to John

725
00:56:41.519 --> 00:56:44.880
<v Speaker 1>de Gramaryan. So this wasn't actually just like a minor

726
00:56:45.000 --> 00:56:47.760
<v Speaker 1>dispute that he had, Like he was very passionate about

727
00:56:48.960 --> 00:56:52.039
<v Speaker 1>these theological differences. He said that he said that John

728
00:56:52.159 --> 00:56:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Gramarian was an Ammonite that was foreign to the laws

729
00:56:54.960 --> 00:56:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of Israel, basically implying that like his church is Israel.

730
00:56:58.519 --> 00:56:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, So.

731
00:57:00.840 --> 00:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, like he's very like this isn't just something

732
00:57:03.039 --> 00:57:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that like Severis wasn't like, oh, you know, this is

733
00:57:05.360 --> 00:57:07.599
<v Speaker 1>what I think, but I might be wrong. No, this

734
00:57:07.760 --> 00:57:10.559
<v Speaker 1>is something that I really do believe. And if and

735
00:57:10.679 --> 00:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>if we have a different point of view, then you're

736
00:57:14.039 --> 00:57:17.679
<v Speaker 1>in history in eighties Jew and I really hate you.

737
00:57:17.800 --> 00:57:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Like this is the kind of view he has for this.

738
00:57:20.239 --> 00:57:22.679
<v Speaker 1>So he's very adamant on protecting protecting this view, which

739
00:57:24.039 --> 00:57:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the same we cannot say for the Coptics today, the

740
00:57:26.159 --> 00:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>same we cannot say for some Ecumenists, even in the

741
00:57:28.960 --> 00:57:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox camp today, in this regard, we can't I at least,

742
00:57:33.079 --> 00:57:35.360
<v Speaker 1>even though he's referring to art side, I at least

743
00:57:35.800 --> 00:57:38.679
<v Speaker 1>admire the passion he has for his beliefs in that sense,

744
00:57:39.360 --> 00:57:41.519
<v Speaker 1>because I wish I saw that passionate other people, but

745
00:57:41.800 --> 00:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>instead we see ecumenism. But speaking of Severis, there's an

746
00:57:46.440 --> 00:57:49.159
<v Speaker 1>interesting part in God History Dialectic. This is in well,

747
00:57:49.199 --> 00:57:51.519
<v Speaker 1>this is in the volume one PDF. I don't know

748
00:57:51.559 --> 00:57:54.199
<v Speaker 1>if the pages are different in the in the book itself,

749
00:57:54.800 --> 00:57:59.840
<v Speaker 1>but this is in page two twenty three. He just

750
00:58:00.119 --> 00:58:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Ferrell says that Severus used the term energy in two senses, right,

751
00:58:03.960 --> 00:58:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So he does have a doction of energies, one as

752
00:58:07.519 --> 00:58:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the source of act activity or operation, and two when

753
00:58:11.519 --> 00:58:14.679
<v Speaker 1>he explains how the humanity itself is understood to be

754
00:58:14.840 --> 00:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the operational energy of the deity within the incarnation. So

755
00:58:18.760 --> 00:58:21.519
<v Speaker 1>to vindicate this, there are three sections. I'm going to

756
00:58:21.559 --> 00:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>read only one of them, but there's three sections in

757
00:58:23.519 --> 00:58:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Severus's letter. One. This is to Ecumenicus where he actually

758
00:58:27.480 --> 00:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>says this. So this is letter one to Ecumenicus Severus

759
00:58:30.960 --> 00:58:33.159
<v Speaker 1>of Antioch. He says that if then the Word changed,

760
00:58:33.199 --> 00:58:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the manhood which he had hypostatic united to him, not

761
00:58:36.440 --> 00:58:39.159
<v Speaker 1>into his nature, for he remained at which he was,

762
00:58:39.800 --> 00:58:43.079
<v Speaker 1>but into his glory and operation, and things which manifestly

763
00:58:43.119 --> 00:58:45.079
<v Speaker 1>belong to the flesh have come to belong to the

764
00:58:45.159 --> 00:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Word in himself. How shall we allow that each of

765
00:58:48.079 --> 00:58:50.599
<v Speaker 1>the forms performs its own acts. So he's referring to

766
00:58:50.679 --> 00:58:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the tone of THEO obviously, but again three instances in

767
00:58:54.440 --> 00:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the first letter he says the same thing, like, how

768
00:58:57.480 --> 00:59:00.519
<v Speaker 1>the humanity is the operation or energy of the deity

769
00:59:00.599 --> 00:59:05.599
<v Speaker 1>with an incarnation. So in the next page Pharaoh says

770
00:59:05.679 --> 00:59:09.760
<v Speaker 1>two to the four. This entails two disturbing implications. Number one,

771
00:59:10.199 --> 00:59:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is humanity energy of the deity of Christ in the

772
00:59:12.440 --> 00:59:15.719
<v Speaker 1>sense of the actual process of the deities operation? Why

773
00:59:15.840 --> 00:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>extension is creation itself therefore God's energy, and therefore did

774
00:59:19.519 --> 00:59:22.119
<v Speaker 1>God have to create as occurred in the originst problem?

775
00:59:23.159 --> 00:59:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Or this is the second point is the humanity? But

776
00:59:25.840 --> 00:59:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the object of the operation of the deity. Does the

777
00:59:28.880 --> 00:59:32.079
<v Speaker 1>humanity not become, to use Servers's own words, a piece

778
00:59:32.119 --> 00:59:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of wood or flint to be pushed about here and there,

779
00:59:35.280 --> 00:59:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or to use Saint Augustine's words, a lump to be

780
00:59:37.920 --> 00:59:42.199
<v Speaker 1>moved about by God from one state to another? As such?

781
00:59:42.320 --> 00:59:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Does God will it each and every moment to be

782
00:59:44.400 --> 00:59:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fearful in his humanity? Et cetera, and et cetera. And

783
00:59:47.880 --> 00:59:50.519
<v Speaker 1>then we will get on to this later. Actually about

784
00:59:50.599 --> 00:59:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this and how this, how Pharaoh actually makes a good

785
00:59:54.119 --> 00:59:57.079
<v Speaker 1>case about this? And is this not capable of being

786
00:59:57.159 --> 01:00:00.599
<v Speaker 1>understood in doucty sense? In this regard one must recall

787
01:00:00.639 --> 01:00:03.079
<v Speaker 1>it several speaks of operation energy as the eruption of

788
01:00:03.159 --> 01:00:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the will. Does one arise at the classical amounophysid form

789
01:00:06.239 --> 01:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of one energy, one will, which has two sets of manifestations.

790
01:00:09.519 --> 01:00:11.599
<v Speaker 1>This is crucial because a lot of people make this mistake.

791
01:00:12.760 --> 01:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We will get to this more in debt, But a

792
01:00:14.880 --> 01:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of people will see, like diotelite statements from severus

793
01:00:19.119 --> 01:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>and they will think that, oh, that means he believes

794
01:00:21.639 --> 01:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in two wills. Well not actually, because in all of

795
01:00:24.480 --> 01:00:27.559
<v Speaker 1>those statements he talks about it being displayed as two wills. So,

796
01:00:27.639 --> 01:00:31.079
<v Speaker 1>for example, a statement I've heard severus says is that

797
01:00:31.239 --> 01:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Crucifixion Christ displays two wills in sulvafic suffering,

798
01:00:36.000 --> 01:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people use that to say, oh,

799
01:00:38.320 --> 01:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>look we are diotelites. Well, actually, he says displays. That's

800
01:00:41.320 --> 01:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the key word. He displays. There's two manifestations of the

801
01:00:45.519 --> 01:00:48.639
<v Speaker 1>one divine human tandric will. And again we will get

802
01:00:48.679 --> 01:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to this very much in detail, how this exactly happens,

803
01:00:54.480 --> 01:00:57.679
<v Speaker 1>which will actually get to now exactly if you have

804
01:00:57.800 --> 01:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>anything to add, we will get to services theology and

805
01:01:01.079 --> 01:01:05.639
<v Speaker 1>how the Oriental theology leads to mono energies monotelicism. This

806
01:01:06.559 --> 01:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is the contrast even began.

807
01:01:08.079 --> 01:01:09.920
<v Speaker 9>Right, This is the key thing to understand that the

808
01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:12.920
<v Speaker 9>track of this debate goes in a certain way. So

809
01:01:13.679 --> 01:01:16.360
<v Speaker 9>it's really difficult to try to dive into this issue

810
01:01:16.440 --> 01:01:19.079
<v Speaker 9>and try to understand it or discuss it if you

811
01:01:19.239 --> 01:01:22.239
<v Speaker 9>don't have the right entrance point, right, if you don't

812
01:01:22.239 --> 01:01:24.599
<v Speaker 9>have the right place to come into the debate. If

813
01:01:24.639 --> 01:01:26.840
<v Speaker 9>you come into debate at the time of Calcedon, you

814
01:01:26.920 --> 01:01:31.840
<v Speaker 9>won't know that this moves into the subject of two

815
01:01:32.039 --> 01:01:34.039
<v Speaker 9>energies and two wills. And this is why I say

816
01:01:34.159 --> 01:01:37.920
<v Speaker 9>Maximus will be so so crucial, because Maximus will have

817
01:01:37.960 --> 01:01:40.159
<v Speaker 9>a dispute with peis that I've talked about many times,

818
01:01:40.159 --> 01:01:41.559
<v Speaker 9>and we're actually going to do a whole talk on

819
01:01:41.599 --> 01:01:43.360
<v Speaker 9>this book. As I promised a long time ago. I

820
01:01:43.440 --> 01:01:45.760
<v Speaker 9>just forgot about it. And what we're going to see

821
01:01:45.840 --> 01:01:49.360
<v Speaker 9>is that there's a dialectic at work in the tension

822
01:01:49.480 --> 01:01:52.920
<v Speaker 9>between There's an assumed natural tension on the part of

823
01:01:53.920 --> 01:01:58.000
<v Speaker 9>people like Severus, between the human will and the divine will,

824
01:01:58.119 --> 01:02:00.400
<v Speaker 9>whether in Man or in Christ. It's just assume that

825
01:02:00.440 --> 01:02:02.559
<v Speaker 9>there's going to be some natural tenson. You actually see

826
01:02:02.639 --> 01:02:05.440
<v Speaker 9>that natural tension in Augustine as well. So I want

827
01:02:05.480 --> 01:02:08.639
<v Speaker 9>to stress to everybody the place to start on this topic.

828
01:02:10.719 --> 01:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It is.

829
01:02:11.679 --> 01:02:13.440
<v Speaker 9>It is relevant if you do want to get into

830
01:02:13.480 --> 01:02:16.800
<v Speaker 9>these topics, If you just dive in at Calston, it's

831
01:02:16.800 --> 01:02:19.360
<v Speaker 9>going to be difficult, it's going to be confusing. So,

832
01:02:20.079 --> 01:02:24.400
<v Speaker 9>of course, as we have recommended for many years, one

833
01:02:24.440 --> 01:02:26.480
<v Speaker 9>of the great places to start is the dispute when

834
01:02:26.519 --> 01:02:30.000
<v Speaker 9>the story is Saint Alexander and the Christological controversy of

835
01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.039
<v Speaker 9>the John McGucken book, and then we have I would recommend,

836
01:02:35.960 --> 01:02:38.880
<v Speaker 9>especially the Bradshaw book, because the latter chapters of the

837
01:02:38.960 --> 01:02:43.199
<v Speaker 9>Bradshaw Book are actually going to show the Augustinian underlying

838
01:02:43.199 --> 01:02:47.079
<v Speaker 9>assumptions of simplicity that will not only underlie the Western

839
01:02:47.320 --> 01:02:50.519
<v Speaker 9>Latin tradition of the Triad and their errors on the

840
01:02:50.559 --> 01:02:52.960
<v Speaker 9>Trinity and the Philly Oquay, but it's actually going to

841
01:02:53.719 --> 01:02:59.519
<v Speaker 9>explain the Western notion of form and essence and simplicity,

842
01:03:00.239 --> 01:03:03.519
<v Speaker 9>and this conditions the Christology. This is so important to

843
01:03:03.639 --> 01:03:06.840
<v Speaker 9>understand is that the essence energy issue is not just

844
01:03:06.960 --> 01:03:11.000
<v Speaker 9>about the Triad. It's crucially about Christology. And this comes

845
01:03:11.079 --> 01:03:13.320
<v Speaker 9>to the forefront of the debate at the sixth Council.

846
01:03:13.880 --> 01:03:17.920
<v Speaker 9>So when Saint Maximus argues this against Puris the Monothelite,

847
01:03:18.119 --> 01:03:23.360
<v Speaker 9>who is the outworking of this metaphysicite Oriental sense of

848
01:03:23.440 --> 01:03:26.079
<v Speaker 9>the term right, because we can understand metaphysis in an

849
01:03:26.119 --> 01:03:28.800
<v Speaker 9>Orthodox way. By the time that it's being debated in

850
01:03:28.880 --> 01:03:33.519
<v Speaker 9>Maximus's day Sat Maximus's day, the debate becomes about the

851
01:03:33.639 --> 01:03:36.159
<v Speaker 9>natural tension between the human will and energy and the

852
01:03:36.239 --> 01:03:38.679
<v Speaker 9>divine and so the debate, a lot of it will

853
01:03:38.679 --> 01:03:41.440
<v Speaker 9>be about in this book Christ saying let this cup

854
01:03:41.519 --> 01:03:44.800
<v Speaker 9>pass from me, and this will lead eventually to the

855
01:03:44.920 --> 01:03:48.639
<v Speaker 9>denial of the gnomic will. So Christ not possessing a

856
01:03:48.679 --> 01:03:53.119
<v Speaker 9>gnomic will necessitates that he's a strictly speaking, divine hypostasis

857
01:03:53.480 --> 01:03:56.400
<v Speaker 9>who possesses a divine in human nature. Right, there's no

858
01:03:56.519 --> 01:03:59.960
<v Speaker 9>created hypostasis in Christ, because if you possess a created hypostasis,

859
01:04:00.519 --> 01:04:02.639
<v Speaker 9>the most likely there would be some notion of a

860
01:04:03.840 --> 01:04:06.760
<v Speaker 9>gnomic will. But the argument is often made that he

861
01:04:06.920 --> 01:04:09.320
<v Speaker 9>doesn't possess a gnomic will because he's a divine person.

862
01:04:09.440 --> 01:04:14.039
<v Speaker 9>So the neo cyrillic defense is what wins out after

863
01:04:14.320 --> 01:04:17.719
<v Speaker 9>the Calcedonian debates. So there's two three centuries afterwards of

864
01:04:17.800 --> 01:04:20.559
<v Speaker 9>debate after Chalcidon as to what these terms in these

865
01:04:20.599 --> 01:04:23.880
<v Speaker 9>words mean. And again, the solution to all of this,

866
01:04:24.159 --> 01:04:26.920
<v Speaker 9>in my view, all this stuff, with the debates with

867
01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:30.480
<v Speaker 9>the Orientals, is just simply understanding the consistent patterns of

868
01:04:30.559 --> 01:04:34.679
<v Speaker 9>how we understand those words. It's beginning to be crystallized

869
01:04:34.719 --> 01:04:38.480
<v Speaker 9>in the times of Athanaceous and into the Cappadocians. I'm

870
01:04:38.519 --> 01:04:40.679
<v Speaker 9>not saying it wasn't true before that. It's just beginning

871
01:04:40.679 --> 01:04:43.760
<v Speaker 9>to be crystallized as to what hypostasis means, as to

872
01:04:43.840 --> 01:04:49.639
<v Speaker 9>what hypostatized means. It's particularly Leonchious of Jerusalem who really

873
01:04:50.199 --> 01:04:53.719
<v Speaker 9>codifies in the Karellian sense, the notion of what in

874
01:04:53.840 --> 01:04:57.320
<v Speaker 9>hypostatized means. And that's why this comes to dominate after

875
01:04:57.400 --> 01:05:00.800
<v Speaker 9>that period, right after the time of Leonchius into the

876
01:05:00.840 --> 01:05:03.960
<v Speaker 9>Six Council. The confession of Saint Sophronius is all saying

877
01:05:04.039 --> 01:05:07.239
<v Speaker 9>what we say, right, So that's how we get to

878
01:05:07.320 --> 01:05:11.199
<v Speaker 9>this notion that Christ possesses two wills two energies because

879
01:05:11.400 --> 01:05:13.679
<v Speaker 9>energy is as Saint John Damascus all the way back

880
01:05:13.679 --> 01:05:16.960
<v Speaker 9>to the Cappadians, Energy signifies the type of nature. If

881
01:05:17.039 --> 01:05:19.840
<v Speaker 9>Christ possesses a human and divine nature, then he has

882
01:05:19.920 --> 01:05:23.559
<v Speaker 9>to always possess two wills and two energies, even though

883
01:05:23.840 --> 01:05:27.800
<v Speaker 9>they're not intension, they're always in symphonia. They're working together

884
01:05:27.880 --> 01:05:31.239
<v Speaker 9>in Christ. That's the Orthodox view. So the human will

885
01:05:31.480 --> 01:05:34.559
<v Speaker 9>is deified by the divine will and energy, as the

886
01:05:34.599 --> 01:05:38.360
<v Speaker 9>Fifth and Six Council specify. As exposition of Orthodox Faithbook

887
01:05:38.400 --> 01:05:44.119
<v Speaker 9>three specifies, Christ communicates to his humanity the divine glories

888
01:05:44.920 --> 01:05:48.559
<v Speaker 9>of the uncreated energies. That means it raises and deifies

889
01:05:48.599 --> 01:05:51.960
<v Speaker 9>as human nature, but it doesn't lose its natural properties.

890
01:05:52.199 --> 01:05:56.000
<v Speaker 9>So there's always a human created aspect to Christ. Even

891
01:05:56.039 --> 01:05:59.719
<v Speaker 9>though it's deified. It's never destroyed, it's never divided, it's

892
01:05:59.760 --> 01:06:03.360
<v Speaker 9>never absolved. It always retains its natural properties even though

893
01:06:03.440 --> 01:06:06.559
<v Speaker 9>it's deified. So when Jesus is resurrected, it's the same

894
01:06:06.679 --> 01:06:09.639
<v Speaker 9>body that he had before he was resurrected, but it's deified.

895
01:06:10.239 --> 01:06:12.239
<v Speaker 9>So in the same way, this is the model not

896
01:06:12.480 --> 01:06:16.519
<v Speaker 9>just for Christology, it's the model for the essence, energy distinction,

897
01:06:16.639 --> 01:06:19.119
<v Speaker 9>how God relates to and interacts with the world. It's

898
01:06:19.199 --> 01:06:22.679
<v Speaker 9>the basis for Maximus's logos logi doctrine, right, because the

899
01:06:22.760 --> 01:06:25.559
<v Speaker 9>logi interpenetrate all reality. They are the bases of all

900
01:06:25.639 --> 01:06:28.920
<v Speaker 9>created reality, being the patterns and ideas and archetypes in

901
01:06:28.960 --> 01:06:31.639
<v Speaker 9>the divine mind in the logos. That's why all things

902
01:06:31.639 --> 01:06:35.400
<v Speaker 9>are made through the logos. Again, the logi or uncreated energies,

903
01:06:35.599 --> 01:06:37.400
<v Speaker 9>and the same thing is going to be applied here

904
01:06:37.519 --> 01:06:41.000
<v Speaker 9>in Christology, in the debate between the wills and the natures. Right,

905
01:06:41.199 --> 01:06:45.079
<v Speaker 9>there's a balance here, there's a synergy here, and everything

906
01:06:45.119 --> 01:06:48.079
<v Speaker 9>that David's telling you comes to the forefront in this

907
01:06:48.199 --> 01:06:50.960
<v Speaker 9>dispute with puis all the stuff that I just said

908
01:06:50.960 --> 01:06:53.400
<v Speaker 9>about the logi, the uncreated energy, that's all in this

909
01:06:53.519 --> 01:06:56.159
<v Speaker 9>debate right here. That's the whole locus of this debate.

910
01:06:56.519 --> 01:06:59.239
<v Speaker 9>This is what's cited at the sixth Council when Pope

911
01:06:59.239 --> 01:07:02.000
<v Speaker 9>Saint Agatha's his letter about Christ possessing two wills and

912
01:07:02.039 --> 01:07:05.440
<v Speaker 9>two energies, when San Sophronius writes his letter about Christ

913
01:07:05.519 --> 01:07:09.119
<v Speaker 9>possessing two wills and two energies. This book here is

914
01:07:09.199 --> 01:07:11.679
<v Speaker 9>the source for this. So what David is going to

915
01:07:11.719 --> 01:07:14.079
<v Speaker 9>tell you right now is crucial to the solution of

916
01:07:14.159 --> 01:07:17.519
<v Speaker 9>this whole issue. Yep.

917
01:07:17.880 --> 01:07:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Because what I'm going to be talking about now, as

918
01:07:19.719 --> 01:07:23.239
<v Speaker 1>John of Pephesus, who is also to my knowledge also

919
01:07:23.360 --> 01:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the anti Calcadonian team, he says that Severus Philoxenus,

920
01:07:27.840 --> 01:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>these people are really the creators of the monoty that movement.

921
01:07:31.559 --> 01:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So an objection that we hear genuinely is that a

922
01:07:36.159 --> 01:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Pires was a Calcadonian. He's your problem. That's like a

923
01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Muslim saying like arianism is your problem. I mean, it

924
01:07:43.320 --> 01:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really make any sense. It's a problem for us

925
01:07:46.880 --> 01:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>because monotilitism is wrong. But in their theology many of

926
01:07:50.440 --> 01:07:53.679
<v Speaker 1>their fathers actually teach that. But again I can feel

927
01:07:53.719 --> 01:07:55.639
<v Speaker 1>for the anti calocus in the sense of, well, how

928
01:07:55.840 --> 01:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like can you demonstrate how it is monotilaw is, how

929
01:07:59.039 --> 01:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it is monel energies right, actually precisely, if that's what

930
01:08:02.039 --> 01:08:04.239
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be doing right now. So I'm going

931
01:08:04.320 --> 01:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to start with a quote from Severus in his Harmon

932
01:08:06.880 --> 01:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty five. He says that hypostasis does

933
01:08:10.079 --> 01:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not deny Genus or Ussi or abold the shit, but

934
01:08:12.960 --> 01:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it sets apart and limits in particular icons the one

935
01:08:16.640 --> 01:08:20.279
<v Speaker 1>who subsists. Now, what does this really mean if you're

936
01:08:20.680 --> 01:08:24.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about Ceverus's system And I also talked about this

937
01:08:24.279 --> 01:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in the first stream. He believes that reality exists in

938
01:08:27.800 --> 01:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>three planes. So there's a trinitarian realm, there is the

939
01:08:32.119 --> 01:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>intelligible realm, the realm of the angels, right, and then

940
01:08:35.560 --> 01:08:38.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a material world that we inhabit in right now.

941
01:08:40.399 --> 01:08:44.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's key to understand that for him, like the

942
01:08:45.119 --> 01:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>unity of the hypostasis of Christ, it's not like two

943
01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>material substances that are mixed. Right, they each operate in

944
01:08:51.920 --> 01:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>their own reality. They're in synthesis, which is what we

945
01:08:54.680 --> 01:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>will also say it is a synthesis. Saint Kill himself

946
01:08:57.119 --> 01:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>says that the union is a synthesis. So in that

947
01:08:59.399 --> 01:09:02.159
<v Speaker 1>point we agree it Severus that there is a synthesis.

948
01:09:02.560 --> 01:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>But because of his system, which is based on Plato,

949
01:09:05.920 --> 01:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>based on Platonism, and he's trying to basically christianize that system,

950
01:09:10.800 --> 01:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I will say like he's attempting to at least christianize

951
01:09:13.640 --> 01:09:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the system, unlike like trying to hellenizing it. But the

952
01:09:16.199 --> 01:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>problem is that in his system, these two natures, these

953
01:09:20.119 --> 01:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>two hypostasis, they operate in their own realms. So the

954
01:09:24.079 --> 01:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>vills operate in their own reality. So the divine will,

955
01:09:27.560 --> 01:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the way it operates, it operates in the trinitarian realm.

956
01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The problem here is is that CEUs himself says, I

957
01:09:34.800 --> 01:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>believe in hormily which one is eighty one. I believe

958
01:09:40.239 --> 01:09:43.399
<v Speaker 1>harmily eighty one, where he talks about that the human

959
01:09:43.520 --> 01:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>will is an iconic representation of the divine will, just

960
01:09:46.960 --> 01:09:49.279
<v Speaker 1>as the body is the iconic representation of the soul.

961
01:09:49.279 --> 01:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's a synonymity here. So right, just like how

962
01:09:51.880 --> 01:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the soul animates the body, so does the divine will

963
01:09:55.399 --> 01:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>animate the human will. And this is precisely what we

964
01:09:59.039 --> 01:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mean by monoetulit in severus, it is the divinevill that

965
01:10:02.039 --> 01:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>animates the human will and gives it life. It's it's

966
01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>because that the human will is non self subsistent. It

967
01:10:10.960 --> 01:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>needs the divine will in order to exist, just like

968
01:10:13.600 --> 01:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>how the human hypostasis is non self subsistent. It requires

969
01:10:17.399 --> 01:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the divine hypostasis in order to exist. So this applies

970
01:10:21.399 --> 01:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to energies, and it also applies to the wills. And

971
01:10:24.800 --> 01:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>if you can, and if you if you're not convinced,

972
01:10:27.119 --> 01:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you might say, ah, you know, that seems like a

973
01:10:28.840 --> 01:10:32.159
<v Speaker 1>different argument. Well, let's hear from Severus himself. This is

974
01:10:32.199 --> 01:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>from text twenty six, his letter to John de Huguminos.

975
01:10:36.640 --> 01:10:40.159
<v Speaker 1>He says that and he quotes from Saint Dionistius areopaguide, which, again,

976
01:10:40.920 --> 01:10:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to be fair to Severus, he is quoting these people,

977
01:10:44.560 --> 01:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and he considers Saint Dionistius as an authentic apostle. So

978
01:10:49.039 --> 01:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to his credit, he tries to be patristic, and he

979
01:10:52.279 --> 01:10:56.239
<v Speaker 1>tries to be logical with the Kappadocins. But here's what

980
01:10:56.399 --> 01:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>he says. He says that, as we have already written,

981
01:10:59.279 --> 01:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this is to John the Hegumenus text twenty six of

982
01:11:02.119 --> 01:11:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the Service of Antioch book from Paul and Allen, as

983
01:11:05.560 --> 01:11:08.479
<v Speaker 1>we have already written extensively in other writings, we have

984
01:11:08.680 --> 01:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>understood and understand the statement of the old Holy Deonist

985
01:11:11.880 --> 01:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Hystereopa Guide, who says, when God became human, he performed

986
01:11:16.239 --> 01:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for us a new divine human tantric activity as meaning

987
01:11:19.840 --> 01:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>one composite activity. But this is what this, here is

988
01:11:23.279 --> 01:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>what he says that we will disagree with heavily. So

989
01:11:25.720 --> 01:11:28.159
<v Speaker 1>so far it's good, but then he says, in our

990
01:11:28.319 --> 01:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>eyes it cannot be understood other than as a rejection

991
01:11:32.159 --> 01:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of every duality. So here he is very obviously saying

992
01:11:36.479 --> 01:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that we don't accept the duality of wills. And there's

993
01:11:40.560 --> 01:11:43.399
<v Speaker 1>also numerous quotations that we have that we will get

994
01:11:43.439 --> 01:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to where he believes that separate civil So this is

995
01:11:47.279 --> 01:11:53.399
<v Speaker 1>this obviously strongly implies that Service rejects dietelicism, and this

996
01:11:53.600 --> 01:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is his basis right. The tom of Leo was actually

997
01:11:58.600 --> 01:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>very crucial in the six Segumentical Council because precisely it

998
01:12:01.520 --> 01:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>spoke of two forms of operating, and two bills and

999
01:12:05.960 --> 01:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>two energies operating. And this is actually very this is

1000
01:12:10.039 --> 01:12:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the main part that he disagrees. So he disagrees with

1001
01:12:12.520 --> 01:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the tom of Leo not because of the two forms,

1002
01:12:15.920 --> 01:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>but because the two forms have their own energies, have

1003
01:12:19.720 --> 01:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>their own operations and their own wills. So this is

1004
01:12:22.479 --> 01:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>from against Julian. This is text thirteen in the pauland

1005
01:12:26.560 --> 01:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Allen book, when when he's responding to Julian of Holycarnassus

1006
01:12:30.880 --> 01:12:34.279
<v Speaker 1>who says that Christ has a non different difference, right,

1007
01:12:35.720 --> 01:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he says, so, so Julian accuses servers of believing in

1008
01:12:40.039 --> 01:12:43.479
<v Speaker 1>two properties. Right, He said, oh, you believe in two properties,

1009
01:12:43.520 --> 01:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you believe in two natures, you believe in two operations

1010
01:12:46.840 --> 01:12:50.399
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff. You're like the Calcedonians. And Sarah's

1011
01:12:50.439 --> 01:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>response in reply to these things, we shall say, in short,

1012
01:12:53.720 --> 01:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>one simple true word. Show us that we have written

1013
01:12:56.840 --> 01:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that Christ exists in two natures and into properties.

1014
01:13:01.199 --> 01:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>But you cannot say so, for in every place each

1015
01:13:04.159 --> 01:13:07.479
<v Speaker 1>person discovers that our loveliness and anatomatizes those who divide

1016
01:13:07.520 --> 01:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the one Christ and the duplication of natures and after

1017
01:13:10.960 --> 01:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>operations and their properties. Right, So notice how he talks

1018
01:13:14.119 --> 01:13:18.239
<v Speaker 1>about dividing the Christ into two operations in the duplication

1019
01:13:18.319 --> 01:13:22.159
<v Speaker 1>of operations of the natures. And this also, this statement

1020
01:13:22.600 --> 01:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is very crucial because he also implies again in a

1021
01:13:26.840 --> 01:13:31.119
<v Speaker 1>duplication of natures. Remember, for him, nature's hypostasis in a

1022
01:13:31.199 --> 01:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>duplication of natures and of their operations and their properties.

1023
01:13:34.039 --> 01:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Now what's the problem. So for him, hypostasis is where

1024
01:13:37.600 --> 01:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>energy and will resides. But there's a very simple objection

1025
01:13:40.439 --> 01:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to that. And you we talked about numerous times if

1026
01:13:44.479 --> 01:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if energy was proper to hypostasis, then they triteism, right exactly.

1027
01:13:51.880 --> 01:13:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So again this theology in another sense, we can show,

1028
01:13:54.560 --> 01:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we can see that this theology kind of leads to so.

1029
01:13:56.960 --> 01:14:00.560
<v Speaker 9>I mean typically the Orientals to reply to them, I mean,

1030
01:14:00.600 --> 01:14:02.960
<v Speaker 9>they just have to divide, they have to reject that.

1031
01:14:03.479 --> 01:14:06.800
<v Speaker 9>Uh that predicating back right into the triad, that there's

1032
01:14:06.800 --> 01:14:10.239
<v Speaker 9>a that there's a similarity between uh, nature, person and

1033
01:14:10.279 --> 01:14:12.079
<v Speaker 9>will and the triad and the way that nature, person

1034
01:14:12.159 --> 01:14:14.279
<v Speaker 9>and will function in anthropology and christology.

1035
01:14:14.359 --> 01:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, yep, Uh, I missed that kind of job. I'm

1036
01:14:21.720 --> 01:14:23.279
<v Speaker 1>sorry this is going to be yir, but I missed that.

1037
01:14:23.359 --> 01:14:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Can you repeat that again, I missed that do they?

1038
01:14:26.279 --> 01:14:28.720
<v Speaker 9>So You've interacted with a lot of those guys one

1039
01:14:28.760 --> 01:14:31.039
<v Speaker 9>on one more than I have, And I'm asking a

1040
01:14:31.159 --> 01:14:33.760
<v Speaker 9>question in terms I've wrote the theology that we're talking about,

1041
01:14:33.800 --> 01:14:35.359
<v Speaker 9>but I'm not interacted with a lot of these guys

1042
01:14:35.359 --> 01:14:38.439
<v Speaker 9>in terms of like debates and discussions. What I'm asking

1043
01:14:38.600 --> 01:14:40.720
<v Speaker 9>is is that do they? I mean, it seems to

1044
01:14:40.800 --> 01:14:43.039
<v Speaker 9>me that they would have to deny that there is

1045
01:14:44.079 --> 01:14:49.960
<v Speaker 9>a reading back or reflexive predication between the triad and Christology.

1046
01:14:50.039 --> 01:14:51.800
<v Speaker 9>In other words, wouldn't they just have to say, well,

1047
01:14:52.399 --> 01:14:54.640
<v Speaker 9>in the triad, it's not that way. We have one

1048
01:14:54.680 --> 01:14:58.920
<v Speaker 9>will in God, one energy, three hypostases, but in terms

1049
01:14:58.960 --> 01:15:01.439
<v Speaker 9>of the incarnation it's not that way. It's different.

1050
01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Usually when I or like my friends who got

1051
01:15:06.119 --> 01:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole got these arguments from me, like when they

1052
01:15:08.720 --> 01:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>make these arguments against Orientals, they they literally do not

1053
01:15:12.079 --> 01:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>give an answer, which is very strange. So one instance

1054
01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty funny is that a friend of mine

1055
01:15:18.319 --> 01:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, like, you know, why do you why

1056
01:15:21.960 --> 01:15:25.399
<v Speaker 1>do you reject duality in Christ and and and the Oriental?

1057
01:15:25.479 --> 01:15:30.039
<v Speaker 1>He replied with, well, duality presupposes separation, right because there's

1058
01:15:30.079 --> 01:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a distinction here. And then my friend obviously went on

1059
01:15:33.039 --> 01:15:36.239
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, but the persons in the trinity are distinct,

1060
01:15:36.279 --> 01:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>does that mean the Trinity is divided? Not Actually severe

1061
01:15:38.840 --> 01:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>says yes in the sense of hypostasis, but he literally

1062
01:15:41.840 --> 01:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>got no answers from that. So yeah, there is there

1063
01:15:44.039 --> 01:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is like different applications of Christology and Trinitarian theology. It's

1064
01:15:51.840 --> 01:15:56.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of like double theology in that sense. And so far,

1065
01:15:56.239 --> 01:16:00.039
<v Speaker 1>I haven't really gotten any responses because usually again and

1066
01:16:00.640 --> 01:16:03.399
<v Speaker 1>most of these people, they will adamantly try to make

1067
01:16:03.439 --> 01:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>their position the same as ours, right, they will try

1068
01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to adamantly be diotelites, even though as you can see,

1069
01:16:09.600 --> 01:16:12.399
<v Speaker 1>their father's reject diotelitism. I mean, he says there is

1070
01:16:12.479 --> 01:16:16.199
<v Speaker 1>no duality in Christ. Theandric will right. So the synthetic

1071
01:16:16.640 --> 01:16:21.279
<v Speaker 1>bill is one. So I haven't really heard any proper responses,

1072
01:16:21.399 --> 01:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna have a hard time hearing a proper

1073
01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>response usually because either they don't know of these things

1074
01:16:28.840 --> 01:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty like high level or actually that's pretty

1075
01:16:34.800 --> 01:16:37.279
<v Speaker 1>much most of the reason, or they just want to

1076
01:16:37.439 --> 01:16:40.359
<v Speaker 1>pretend to be like us. So that these are the

1077
01:16:40.439 --> 01:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>main problems that occur in these debates. I'll continue on

1078
01:16:45.079 --> 01:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>with some of the quotations of Servius. This is Serius

1079
01:16:48.039 --> 01:16:52.039
<v Speaker 1>letter forty seven. He says, considering the general benefit of

1080
01:16:52.079 --> 01:16:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a union of the Holy churches and demanding an open

1081
01:16:54.439 --> 01:16:57.359
<v Speaker 1>anatom of the things done as Kulcadon against the Orthodox

1082
01:16:57.479 --> 01:17:00.079
<v Speaker 1>faith and of the wicked tom of Leo, and of

1083
01:17:00.199 --> 01:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>those who speak of two natures after the union, and

1084
01:17:03.039 --> 01:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the operations of these and their properties.

1085
01:17:05.319 --> 01:17:05.439
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1086
01:17:05.520 --> 01:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So again, obviously he's not referring to two natures after

1087
01:17:09.039 --> 01:17:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the union, as to me in essence, right. If he

1088
01:17:11.199 --> 01:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>meant that, then that will be even worse, because then

1089
01:17:14.239 --> 01:17:18.239
<v Speaker 1>he will be Utichian. But he means nature's nature to

1090
01:17:18.279 --> 01:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be hypostasis here, and the operations of the hypostasis of

1091
01:17:21.960 --> 01:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>these and their properties. There's another example, letter thirty nine.

1092
01:17:28.840 --> 01:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to read the entire thing, Actually, I wiel.

1093
01:17:31.279 --> 01:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>It's also a man who accepts the right confession of

1094
01:17:33.439 --> 01:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the edict if it is enough for him, and he

1095
01:17:35.439 --> 01:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>does not add the exact words which remove the heresy,

1096
01:17:38.399 --> 01:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>opens the door to impiety through the ambiguity of the

1097
01:17:40.880 --> 01:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>written words, and falls under the synthesis of the Holy

1098
01:17:43.279 --> 01:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>gregory in that he is doing detriment to the truth.

1099
01:17:46.319 --> 01:17:49.239
<v Speaker 1>But if besides the edict, he both confesses one incarrtent

1100
01:17:49.319 --> 01:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>nature of God the Word and anathematizes those who speak

1101
01:17:51.920 --> 01:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of two natures after the union, and the operations and

1102
01:17:54.720 --> 01:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>properties of these, and all the impiety that was confirmed

1103
01:17:57.640 --> 01:18:01.039
<v Speaker 1>with Kalkadon. He has removed the danger that is expected

1104
01:18:01.079 --> 01:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>from the ambiguity. So this is letter thirty nine. Another

1105
01:18:05.640 --> 01:18:09.079
<v Speaker 1>this is the final letter that I will read. This

1106
01:18:09.279 --> 01:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is his letter to Ecumenicus, Letter one. Accordingly, good doctrine

1107
01:18:13.640 --> 01:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is contained an end of the Syrian king. For it

1108
01:18:16.079 --> 01:18:19.279
<v Speaker 1>anathematizes those who divide the one son who has hyperstack

1109
01:18:19.479 --> 01:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>united to flesh, into two natures, and the operations and

1110
01:18:22.520 --> 01:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>properties of the same two natures. So again this is

1111
01:18:25.439 --> 01:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>the main difference that they have with the tom of Leo.

1112
01:18:28.479 --> 01:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not really about nature per se, about the energy's

1113
01:18:33.279 --> 01:18:38.239
<v Speaker 1>bills and all that jazz. That's really the real difference here.

1114
01:18:38.880 --> 01:18:42.800
<v Speaker 9>Human will becomes an iconic representation of the divine will,

1115
01:18:42.920 --> 01:18:46.159
<v Speaker 9>and it's subjected to it. There's a dialectical definition of

1116
01:18:46.279 --> 01:18:53.239
<v Speaker 9>will and choice here. This is a critique that for

1117
01:18:53.359 --> 01:18:56.960
<v Speaker 9>all makes in the section on energy will an agency

1118
01:18:58.119 --> 01:19:01.439
<v Speaker 9>in the and the point there is to say once

1119
01:19:01.479 --> 01:19:04.560
<v Speaker 9>again that this whole position is predicated on dialectics. There

1120
01:19:04.640 --> 01:19:10.479
<v Speaker 9>has to be some natural tension between created and uncreated,

1121
01:19:10.520 --> 01:19:15.239
<v Speaker 9>between human will and divine will, between grace and nature.

1122
01:19:16.439 --> 01:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And we will talk exactly about that. So that's enough

1123
01:19:18.920 --> 01:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>about Servius for now. I will introduce Pix Sinnes of

1124
01:19:23.199 --> 01:19:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Madbuck into this. So he was a bishop of modern

1125
01:19:26.119 --> 01:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>day Montbisch. He was a contemporary of Severus of Antioch,

1126
01:19:30.159 --> 01:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's a huge deal. So if the vest has

1127
01:19:32.600 --> 01:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Saint Augustine, Saint Jerome, and Thomas Aquinas as their faces,

1128
01:19:37.079 --> 01:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>then Orientals, at least in their mind, their faces will

1129
01:19:40.600 --> 01:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>be Saint Kirol of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch, and Philix

1130
01:19:43.880 --> 01:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Cinnus of Mabock. They will be like the faces of

1131
01:19:46.079 --> 01:19:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Oriental theology. The thing about Felix Sennus of Madboch is

1132
01:19:51.880 --> 01:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>his theology is even more explicitly heretical. So if you

1133
01:19:56.640 --> 01:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>look at page sixty eight and sixty nine in the

1134
01:19:59.439 --> 01:20:03.319
<v Speaker 1>book Three Monophysite Christologies, Seras of Fantic, filix Is of

1135
01:20:03.359 --> 01:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Mabig and Jacobo Sarug. This book was written by ROBERTA. Chestnut,

1136
01:20:07.960 --> 01:20:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Page sixty eight and sixty nine. Felix Senda says, Felixids

1137
01:20:12.079 --> 01:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>believes in materialism, so he preaches materialism. He believes that

1138
01:20:15.840 --> 01:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the body is the densest, the soul is lighter, and

1139
01:20:19.159 --> 01:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>God is the lightest being of false so he believes

1140
01:20:21.880 --> 01:20:29.239
<v Speaker 1>in some form of materialism. Having made that, note what

1141
01:20:29.479 --> 01:20:34.479
<v Speaker 1>he says in hormily in harmony twelve, he believes that

1142
01:20:34.600 --> 01:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the body and the soul have two vills at war

1143
01:20:37.039 --> 01:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with each other. So this is the body soul right,

1144
01:20:38.680 --> 01:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>human body and soul. So the body has a has

1145
01:20:41.520 --> 01:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a vill and the soul has a will. And this

1146
01:20:45.720 --> 01:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>raised an obvious question, right, how is it that we

1147
01:20:47.960 --> 01:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>have one vill as human beings? Then if body and

1148
01:20:50.439 --> 01:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the soul has a vill and they are involved with

1149
01:20:52.520 --> 01:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>each other, well, it's dialectics of opposition. The vills are

1150
01:20:55.720 --> 01:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>in a synthetic union where they battle over each other.

1151
01:20:58.800 --> 01:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And if the body then right, if the bodily vill wins,

1152
01:21:02.479 --> 01:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's adultery. If the soul wins, it's a good union.

1153
01:21:05.680 --> 01:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't harmonly twelve of Philoxenus of Mambog. He

1154
01:21:09.359 --> 01:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>also goes on to say that the bodily will doesn't

1155
01:21:11.800 --> 01:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>merely lust after food or sexual satisfaction or any of that.

1156
01:21:15.159 --> 01:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not what the body will is. It's literally

1157
01:21:18.039 --> 01:21:22.880
<v Speaker 1>about everything about the world. So philosophy, science, rationality, argumentation, debates.

1158
01:21:22.960 --> 01:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>These are all lusts of the body. They're all part

1159
01:21:26.239 --> 01:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of the bodyvill and the soul lusts after the things

1160
01:21:29.560 --> 01:21:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of the spirit. Right, So for the spiritual realm, this

1161
01:21:32.520 --> 01:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is what the So it's like the soul is like

1162
01:21:34.640 --> 01:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this hyper pietistic, and the body is this like I

1163
01:21:38.960 --> 01:21:42.239
<v Speaker 1>will always debate it like this crazy debate maniac guy.

1164
01:21:43.199 --> 01:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>If we were if we were personifying these two bodybuil

1165
01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>body soulvills and these two as Philoxenis himself says, I

1166
01:21:52.680 --> 01:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>post I told either screenshot Jay if you're showing that.

1167
01:21:56.600 --> 01:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>In Harly ten eleven and twelve, he consistently says that

1168
01:22:00.840 --> 01:22:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the body and the soul are by nature opposed to

1169
01:22:04.359 --> 01:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>each other. So by nature they're opposed to each other,

1170
01:22:07.119 --> 01:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>according to Philix Sinus of mad Bog, So this is

1171
01:22:10.680 --> 01:22:13.039
<v Speaker 1>how humanity is from. And again, why are we talking

1172
01:22:13.039 --> 01:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>about body and soul? Well, it deals with anthropology, but

1173
01:22:16.479 --> 01:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>it also deals with Christ himself, right, it also deals

1174
01:22:19.439 --> 01:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with this also applies to Christ himself and his body

1175
01:22:22.680 --> 01:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and his soul. Now, some people might say, oh, you know,

1176
01:22:26.960 --> 01:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this is too far. We don't we reject that. Okay,

1177
01:22:31.039 --> 01:22:34.239
<v Speaker 1>they'll say this is too far, we don't agree with everything.

1178
01:22:34.279 --> 01:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Philoxin says, well, that's a problem because Severus and philox

1179
01:22:37.199 --> 01:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Sinnus were good friends. They knew each other, they knew

1180
01:22:39.640 --> 01:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>what they believed, they knew each other. So we will

1181
01:22:42.680 --> 01:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>say philox Innes doesn't have he doesn't have a different christology.

1182
01:22:47.119 --> 01:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>He compliments. I will say Severus's Christology, because as I said,

1183
01:22:51.239 --> 01:22:54.079
<v Speaker 1>they're both in the same team. They both they both

1184
01:22:54.239 --> 01:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>very well know each other. But to repeat on the

1185
01:22:59.680 --> 01:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>on the on the human will, on how the human

1186
01:23:02.159 --> 01:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>will is formed. Again, the human will is synthetically formed,

1187
01:23:06.079 --> 01:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just like how the divine and human will are synthetically formed.

1188
01:23:08.760 --> 01:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>We call this the tiandric vill and these are in

1189
01:23:11.720 --> 01:23:14.479
<v Speaker 1>opposition with each other. And just like that, the divine

1190
01:23:14.560 --> 01:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>will and the human will are also by nature in

1191
01:23:17.520 --> 01:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>opposition to one another. There's an example. So there's an

1192
01:23:21.479 --> 01:23:25.319
<v Speaker 1>example of Service of Antioch where he speaks of again

1193
01:23:25.399 --> 01:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Christ displaying two wills in sulif excepting He then goes

1194
01:23:28.199 --> 01:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on to say that that Christ, in his humanity, was

1195
01:23:31.880 --> 01:23:35.239
<v Speaker 1>very fearful and Philix Sinistan's service both agree that he

1196
01:23:35.439 --> 01:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was more fearful than a normal human. Bul right, he

1197
01:23:37.760 --> 01:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>was incredibly fearful, but at the same time he had

1198
01:23:40.880 --> 01:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>divine courage. And what Saint Maximus will say in response

1199
01:23:43.920 --> 01:23:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to this is that fear and courage are both human emotions, right,

1200
01:23:48.399 --> 01:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>So there these both pertain to the human will of Christ.

1201
01:23:51.359 --> 01:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>They're not in dialectical tension, right. The human will wasn't

1202
01:23:54.319 --> 01:23:57.279
<v Speaker 1>scared and the divine will was. We'll say, oh, you

1203
01:23:57.319 --> 01:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>know whatever, it's fine. There wasn't any tension like that

1204
01:24:00.119 --> 01:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>between those two. But in their view, in the Oriental view,

1205
01:24:02.960 --> 01:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>there is a tension. And what's really important again, this

1206
01:24:09.479 --> 01:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>will is synthetic, just like how christ will is synthetic.

1207
01:24:12.640 --> 01:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>A huge implication, and we can see from Servius himself

1208
01:24:16.720 --> 01:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and most likely Filoxcentus, they both reject epicatus stasis, and

1209
01:24:21.840 --> 01:24:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously because they want to follow the fathers, right,

1210
01:24:24.520 --> 01:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>so we can credit them for that. They're trying to

1211
01:24:26.199 --> 01:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>remain orthodox. But the problem is in their theology. If

1212
01:24:29.439 --> 01:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the divine will in Christ animated the human will, then

1213
01:24:32.560 --> 01:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>how is it that in the recapitulation, how is it

1214
01:24:35.600 --> 01:24:40.079
<v Speaker 1>that Christ is not gonna animate or human wills. Again,

1215
01:24:40.119 --> 01:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>how is it that because in Christ the human will

1216
01:24:43.479 --> 01:24:47.039
<v Speaker 1>was subsumed and was dominated by the divine will, then

1217
01:24:47.119 --> 01:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>that logically follows the same should be happening in the Esctan. Therefore,

1218
01:24:50.560 --> 01:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>universalism should actually be true. Isn't that truth? Shouldn't In

1219
01:24:54.199 --> 01:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Oriental view, universalism be the consistent theological truth instead

1220
01:24:59.720 --> 01:25:06.079
<v Speaker 1>of whatever version of apricateastasis they have. So someone Stephen

1221
01:25:06.159 --> 01:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>barstud Highly even takes this one step further and he

1222
01:25:10.319 --> 01:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>says that and he's a heretic according to the Oriental position,

1223
01:25:15.680 --> 01:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but his view is very interesting because I think it's

1224
01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>logically consistent. He says that not only will we all

1225
01:25:21.439 --> 01:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>be said, but we will all be consubstantial with God himself.

1226
01:25:24.680 --> 01:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>So again, this position is heretical in the Oriental Church.

1227
01:25:28.560 --> 01:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>So this is not an attack against Oriental churche. But

1228
01:25:31.239 --> 01:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that this is what logically should follow

1229
01:25:34.920 --> 01:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have this doctrine of phils, this is what

1230
01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>should be happening. Because if, again, if in Christ, the

1231
01:25:40.520 --> 01:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>divine will dominates the human will, then who's to say

1232
01:25:43.680 --> 01:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the same won't be happening to us. That's why we

1233
01:25:45.840 --> 01:25:48.239
<v Speaker 1>have a synergy of the human and divine wills. We

1234
01:25:48.279 --> 01:25:51.239
<v Speaker 1>don't have an opposition, because the moment you have an opposition,

1235
01:25:51.720 --> 01:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>there are many different theological problems that come out of that.

1236
01:25:58.359 --> 01:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's Wold. And if you look at Jacob of Saruk,

1237
01:26:01.960 --> 01:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>just a small chapter on him on Hills, he himself

1238
01:26:05.960 --> 01:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>like he absolutely believes that there's one nature of one veil,

1239
01:26:08.800 --> 01:26:12.039
<v Speaker 1>one energy. Like he's very open about that. And he's

1240
01:26:12.079 --> 01:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a saint in the Truth is an important scene, not

1241
01:26:15.279 --> 01:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>theologically speaking, but as a general saint, he is very

1242
01:26:18.680 --> 01:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>important in the communion. So do you have anything to

1243
01:26:21.520 --> 01:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>add about Vill's j.

1244
01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:27.159
<v Speaker 9>Because that will be that it's important to understand that

1245
01:26:28.479 --> 01:26:31.439
<v Speaker 9>the movement and action and property will can't be defined

1246
01:26:31.840 --> 01:26:36.439
<v Speaker 9>after the fall a post Lapsarian doctrine of a defining

1247
01:26:36.720 --> 01:26:41.359
<v Speaker 9>free will. It's part of what affects the western Augustinian definition.

1248
01:26:41.920 --> 01:26:44.000
<v Speaker 9>So you don't have an Augustine, for example, any notion

1249
01:26:44.239 --> 01:26:48.560
<v Speaker 9>of the ability to choose between multiple goods. And this

1250
01:26:48.720 --> 01:26:52.359
<v Speaker 9>actually comes into the debate with the Monothelites in terms

1251
01:26:52.399 --> 01:26:56.000
<v Speaker 9>of Paris and the way that Saint Maximus will debate

1252
01:26:56.039 --> 01:26:58.840
<v Speaker 9>with heroes. He'll actually make the argument that if there's

1253
01:26:58.880 --> 01:27:02.560
<v Speaker 9>only one sense that we are directing our gaze towards,

1254
01:27:03.279 --> 01:27:08.720
<v Speaker 9>then the originistic definition of free will being defined as

1255
01:27:08.720 --> 01:27:12.880
<v Speaker 9>a choice between good and evil is by necessity married

1256
01:27:12.960 --> 01:27:15.560
<v Speaker 9>to the notion of turning the gaze away from the one,

1257
01:27:15.760 --> 01:27:18.399
<v Speaker 9>the essence of the One. This is another reason why

1258
01:27:18.439 --> 01:27:20.520
<v Speaker 9>we can't hold to the beatific vision. So this is

1259
01:27:20.640 --> 01:27:23.680
<v Speaker 9>absolutely connected to what we're talking about in terms of Christology,

1260
01:27:24.239 --> 01:27:26.920
<v Speaker 9>because in the Esketon, we're not just staring into the

1261
01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:29.279
<v Speaker 9>beatific vision of the essence of God. That's why the

1262
01:27:29.319 --> 01:27:31.920
<v Speaker 9>Eastern fathers nowhere teach this. They teach that we see,

1263
01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:34.920
<v Speaker 9>as Saint Maximus says, the many things around God in

1264
01:27:34.960 --> 01:27:38.520
<v Speaker 9>the Esketon the vision of God, and the Esketon is

1265
01:27:38.600 --> 01:27:42.000
<v Speaker 9>the vision of the uncreated logie, and so that's a

1266
01:27:42.079 --> 01:27:44.840
<v Speaker 9>direct experience of God. But it's also the ability to

1267
01:27:45.399 --> 01:27:48.600
<v Speaker 9>retain free will. How do we retain free will if

1268
01:27:48.640 --> 01:27:51.359
<v Speaker 9>there's no evil? Because evil? Free will is not defined

1269
01:27:51.439 --> 01:27:54.720
<v Speaker 9>dialectically between a choice of good and evil. That's only

1270
01:27:54.880 --> 01:27:57.479
<v Speaker 9>characteristic of the fallen state. When we're not in the

1271
01:27:57.520 --> 01:28:00.640
<v Speaker 9>fallen state anymore, there's the ability to chew use and

1272
01:28:00.760 --> 01:28:04.239
<v Speaker 9>to move the will as a choice between multiple goods,

1273
01:28:04.399 --> 01:28:06.520
<v Speaker 9>and so all of the church fathers will define free

1274
01:28:06.560 --> 01:28:08.880
<v Speaker 9>will as the ability to make choices this thing or

1275
01:28:08.920 --> 01:28:11.119
<v Speaker 9>that thing. But if there's only the essence of God,

1276
01:28:11.279 --> 01:28:14.640
<v Speaker 9>then you can't potentially or possibly actually choose or will

1277
01:28:14.720 --> 01:28:16.960
<v Speaker 9>anything other than the essence of God. This is very

1278
01:28:17.039 --> 01:28:19.800
<v Speaker 9>crucial because absolute define simplicity is not just a doctrine

1279
01:28:19.880 --> 01:28:23.159
<v Speaker 9>of denying the essence synergy distinction, and also applies to Christology.

1280
01:28:23.239 --> 01:28:27.079
<v Speaker 9>It makes Christology impossible. It leads to the dialectical tension

1281
01:28:27.199 --> 01:28:30.199
<v Speaker 9>in people like Severus in the way that they define simplicity.

1282
01:28:30.760 --> 01:28:34.039
<v Speaker 9>Severus will actually use the neoplatonic definition of what simplicity

1283
01:28:34.199 --> 01:28:37.439
<v Speaker 9>is when he talks about what these natures are in themselves,

1284
01:28:37.560 --> 01:28:41.399
<v Speaker 9>and so he makes them reducible into one dimensional categories

1285
01:28:41.399 --> 01:28:44.439
<v Speaker 9>in terms of what nature is or is supposed to be,

1286
01:28:45.640 --> 01:28:47.880
<v Speaker 9>especially in the incarnation. And so this has an effect

1287
01:28:48.560 --> 01:28:51.600
<v Speaker 9>on one's doctrine of free will and choice. And so

1288
01:28:51.760 --> 01:28:54.600
<v Speaker 9>in the Esketon, all those positions that believe in the

1289
01:28:54.680 --> 01:28:57.479
<v Speaker 9>beatific vision in the Roman Catholic Latin sense, they all

1290
01:28:57.640 --> 01:29:01.039
<v Speaker 9>deny free will. In the Escaton redefine it to say, well,

1291
01:29:01.079 --> 01:29:03.439
<v Speaker 9>your will is truly free now because you don't make choices,

1292
01:29:03.479 --> 01:29:07.840
<v Speaker 9>you only choose the essence of God. That's a complete rejection,

1293
01:29:07.960 --> 01:29:10.159
<v Speaker 9>in denial of what all the church fathers taught free

1294
01:29:10.199 --> 01:29:12.880
<v Speaker 9>will was. Did Christ possess free will when he was incarnate?

1295
01:29:12.920 --> 01:29:15.159
<v Speaker 9>Of course he did. Did he only will one thing?

1296
01:29:15.239 --> 01:29:16.800
<v Speaker 9>Did he only will the essence of God? I mean,

1297
01:29:16.840 --> 01:29:20.279
<v Speaker 9>it's ridiculous, right, No, Christ, just as God can can

1298
01:29:20.399 --> 01:29:22.920
<v Speaker 9>freely will to do different things. God freely chose to

1299
01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:26.439
<v Speaker 9>create the world. Christ freely walked around and willed to

1300
01:29:26.520 --> 01:29:28.960
<v Speaker 9>do what he did, and he freely willed in both

1301
01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:32.039
<v Speaker 9>of his natures right, the human will and will were

1302
01:29:32.119 --> 01:29:33.439
<v Speaker 9>freely operating.

1303
01:29:34.880 --> 01:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Sorry I interrupted you, ja, but I was gonna I

1304
01:29:37.640 --> 01:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>was gonna add. The oriental response to this, The oriental

1305
01:29:40.760 --> 01:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>view will be that since God is good, like he's

1306
01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>marebely good, then there is no kind of like there

1307
01:29:46.800 --> 01:29:49.439
<v Speaker 1>is free will. But because God is good, the feeble

1308
01:29:49.600 --> 01:29:52.239
<v Speaker 1>aspect is only in the human wild, if that makes sense.

1309
01:29:53.199 --> 01:29:56.479
<v Speaker 1>In contrast to like how they will view this, this

1310
01:29:56.720 --> 01:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>builds question mm hmm, go ahead, all right, I'll go ahead.

1311
01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess in this I think I dealt with wills.

1312
01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:20.079
<v Speaker 1>I want to kind of talk about to move on.

1313
01:30:20.279 --> 01:30:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to move on to Phillixinus's eucharistic problems. I

1314
01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this in the first stream as well with Jay.

1315
01:30:28.800 --> 01:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So there are two. So Christ, for Philoxinus exists as

1316
01:30:33.800 --> 01:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>God by nature and as a man by miracle. So

1317
01:30:36.920 --> 01:30:41.359
<v Speaker 1>there's like two different modes of existences. There's a miraculous

1318
01:30:41.439 --> 01:30:45.119
<v Speaker 1>existence that that he exists out by the virtue of

1319
01:30:45.159 --> 01:30:50.239
<v Speaker 1>his will and his natural existence as God. Now this

1320
01:30:50.439 --> 01:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is relevant because this goes into the eucharistic theology. And

1321
01:30:54.640 --> 01:30:58.399
<v Speaker 1>so as an example I used is, let's say that

1322
01:30:58.479 --> 01:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you're an atheist and you're anti Caan Church, and phillix

1323
01:31:01.800 --> 01:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Sinus is right there like looking at you, and you

1324
01:31:03.800 --> 01:31:06.359
<v Speaker 1>take the Euchrist. Your atheist, you don't believe in anything,

1325
01:31:06.399 --> 01:31:09.119
<v Speaker 1>but you somehow manage to take the Eucharist, and you

1326
01:31:09.279 --> 01:31:12.319
<v Speaker 1>come back to Philixinus and you're like, hey, I took

1327
01:31:12.359 --> 01:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Euchrist and you said that I was. You guys

1328
01:31:14.960 --> 01:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>say that I was going to get that, but nothing

1329
01:31:16.840 --> 01:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>happened to me. And philix sins will respond to that, well, yes,

1330
01:31:20.119 --> 01:31:23.079
<v Speaker 1>because you don't have faith. You don't have faith, so

1331
01:31:23.760 --> 01:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the way you observe the Euchrist, that's just mere bread

1332
01:31:26.760 --> 01:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and wine. But if you had faith. Right, the mode

1333
01:31:29.960 --> 01:31:33.039
<v Speaker 1>which the Euchrist will exist via those who have faith

1334
01:31:33.920 --> 01:31:36.439
<v Speaker 1>is that it will really be the body and blood

1335
01:31:36.479 --> 01:31:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of Christ. Now, this in a sense makes some sense,

1336
01:31:41.880 --> 01:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but the problem is that if you apply this to

1337
01:31:43.960 --> 01:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Christ then there are some problems. Right. For example, if

1338
01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't have faith, then is Christ God? And this

1339
01:31:49.119 --> 01:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes people make enables a question to be

1340
01:31:52.640 --> 01:31:57.159
<v Speaker 1>asked to philixins and leads to certain rabbit holes. That's

1341
01:31:57.399 --> 01:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>pilix Sinnis himself will reject, but his understanding of being

1342
01:32:01.600 --> 01:32:04.119
<v Speaker 1>by nature and being by faith, and there's kind of

1343
01:32:04.239 --> 01:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>two levels, two modes of being, enables problematic conclusions. So

1344
01:32:09.159 --> 01:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the argument I'm making here is that if the Euchrist

1345
01:32:12.840 --> 01:32:16.039
<v Speaker 1>changes depending on how you view the Eucharist, then naturally,

1346
01:32:16.119 --> 01:32:19.079
<v Speaker 1>by that logic, Christ should be changing depending on how

1347
01:32:19.199 --> 01:32:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you view Christ. Right, So if you look at the

1348
01:32:21.279 --> 01:32:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Euchrist without faith, obviously Philoxenus will say, well, obviously as

1349
01:32:26.239 --> 01:32:29.399
<v Speaker 1>bread and wine. But if you have faith, that will

1350
01:32:29.399 --> 01:32:31.239
<v Speaker 1>be the body blood of Christ. So if Christ was

1351
01:32:31.359 --> 01:32:35.199
<v Speaker 1>in front of us, will Christ will be? Will he

1352
01:32:35.319 --> 01:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be a mere human being? If I didn't have faith? Well,

1353
01:32:38.640 --> 01:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this this is some kind of like a relativistic understanding

1354
01:32:41.880 --> 01:32:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of reality and to finance. This is kind of like

1355
01:32:46.439 --> 01:32:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the end. But I would like to talk about Jacob

1356
01:32:50.199 --> 01:32:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of sarug who's by the way to a as a

1357
01:32:53.399 --> 01:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>small as side. He is in the two thousand and

1358
01:32:55.880 --> 01:32:58.479
<v Speaker 1>four Roman Martyrology, so he's a saint in the Latin

1359
01:32:58.600 --> 01:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>rights as well. So good job in Roman Catholics. But

1360
01:33:05.000 --> 01:33:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and he's an anticocatoon right, he wasn't in communion with

1361
01:33:07.439 --> 01:33:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox Church. So there's some really problematic things that Jacob says.

1362
01:33:11.079 --> 01:33:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to list some of them in Harmony fifty three.

1363
01:33:16.119 --> 01:33:20.479
<v Speaker 1>He says that the disciples ask Jesus. He's talking about Judas, right,

1364
01:33:20.760 --> 01:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the disciples ask Jesus, who has gone out of the

1365
01:33:23.880 --> 01:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sphere of the sphere of the light of our Lord

1366
01:33:27.039 --> 01:33:29.199
<v Speaker 1>to go and mix with the darkness in a great,

1367
01:33:29.239 --> 01:33:32.479
<v Speaker 1>great movement. So there are multiple senses in mixture is used.

1368
01:33:33.159 --> 01:33:38.039
<v Speaker 1>And most of the time, if you're talking about philoxiniesen Severus,

1369
01:33:38.079 --> 01:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>when they speak of a mixture, they don't mean it

1370
01:33:40.600 --> 01:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in a heterodox sense, right, They don't really mean it

1371
01:33:42.880 --> 01:33:46.439
<v Speaker 1>in a heterodox sense. It's they're limited by their own terminology.

1372
01:33:47.279 --> 01:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But Jacob, in that sense, when he's speaking of Judas's

1373
01:33:51.840 --> 01:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>essence mixing with the darkness. He is first of all,

1374
01:33:55.039 --> 01:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that evil has a real existence, that it's not

1375
01:33:57.800 --> 01:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a mere privation, but it actually exists. But at the

1376
01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>same time, Judas is essence mixed with evil, and that's

1377
01:34:04.520 --> 01:34:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and this is actually a Gnostic idea that Jacob uses.

1378
01:34:09.600 --> 01:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And as a matter of fact, like I'm not going

1379
01:34:11.760 --> 01:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about every single nasticizing thing that Jacob says,

1380
01:34:14.920 --> 01:34:18.119
<v Speaker 1>but if you read the book ROBERTA. Chestnuts Treatment off

1381
01:34:18.159 --> 01:34:23.199
<v Speaker 1>side Christologist Severus of Antioch, Felixus of madbook Jacob of Sarrug,

1382
01:34:23.800 --> 01:34:26.159
<v Speaker 1>if you read the section about Jacob of Surug, there's

1383
01:34:26.279 --> 01:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>many different things that are nasticizing. Does that mean that

1384
01:34:29.439 --> 01:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he is gnostic? I don't think he is by intention,

1385
01:34:32.920 --> 01:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>but the stuff that he says has a lot of

1386
01:34:35.359 --> 01:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>gnostic messagery. So he refers to Christ, he refers to

1387
01:34:40.039 --> 01:34:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the Mother of God, to Mary as as some sort

1388
01:34:44.119 --> 01:34:46.079
<v Speaker 1>of an envelope, like he's some sort of like a

1389
01:34:46.199 --> 01:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>sacred secret envelope that is hidden from people and these

1390
01:34:52.359 --> 01:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>small minor gnostic teams. Again, so I won't say that

1391
01:34:54.880 --> 01:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gnostic theologically speaking, but there's another.

1392
01:34:58.520 --> 01:35:02.800
<v Speaker 9>Thing that he says as it Severus or Jacob Jacob.

1393
01:35:03.039 --> 01:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Jacob is intentionally being gnostic, but a

1394
01:35:06.880 --> 01:35:09.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of the teams that he talks about is definitely

1395
01:35:09.239 --> 01:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like I think.

1396
01:35:11.279 --> 01:35:13.960
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the crazy part about Severus that struck me

1397
01:35:14.439 --> 01:35:19.840
<v Speaker 9>was the discussions about the uh, the unknowability of the

1398
01:35:19.920 --> 01:35:21.560
<v Speaker 9>Father and that you have to have this sort of

1399
01:35:21.600 --> 01:35:22.680
<v Speaker 9>ascent in Christ.

1400
01:35:22.880 --> 01:35:24.560
<v Speaker 7>And then this is the.

1401
01:35:24.920 --> 01:35:28.439
<v Speaker 9>Neoplotonic doctrine of a cent actually of emanation everything.

1402
01:35:29.439 --> 01:35:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in Letters sixty five he actually talks about how

1403
01:35:32.159 --> 01:35:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the sun is. I believe this is cited in the

1404
01:35:35.239 --> 01:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Chestnut book as well. In Letters sixty five, Syrus talks

1405
01:35:38.960 --> 01:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>about how Christ is the object of the contemplation of

1406
01:35:42.800 --> 01:35:46.199
<v Speaker 1>the Father. So there's some aspect of logos theology here,

1407
01:35:46.359 --> 01:35:50.079
<v Speaker 1>like world logos theology. But it's also the same thing

1408
01:35:50.159 --> 01:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that Arian said, right, I mean, and a lot of

1409
01:35:51.840 --> 01:35:56.119
<v Speaker 1>gnostics said to justify the createdness of Christ again, and yeah,

1410
01:35:56.199 --> 01:35:58.479
<v Speaker 1>that team also exists in Serius, and again it's in

1411
01:35:58.560 --> 01:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Letters sixty five. Very it's it's a long letter where

1412
01:36:02.359 --> 01:36:06.039
<v Speaker 1>he deals with multiple questions. Some of them are triological questions,

1413
01:36:06.079 --> 01:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>some of them are dealing with theopaschism. Some of them

1414
01:36:09.039 --> 01:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with other theological stuff. But I believe in

1415
01:36:12.560 --> 01:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the first part he kind of talks about that that

1416
01:36:16.880 --> 01:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Christ is the object of the contemplation of that. Does it?

1417
01:36:19.359 --> 01:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't the Roman Catholic say the same thing? Or am

1418
01:36:22.039 --> 01:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I wrong? Good day?

1419
01:36:23.199 --> 01:36:24.439
<v Speaker 9>How did you phrase it? Say it again?

1420
01:36:26.640 --> 01:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>The Chestnut book speaks of Christ being the object of

1421
01:36:31.479 --> 01:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the contemplation of the Father, so he is the object

1422
01:36:34.680 --> 01:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of Father's contemplation.

1423
01:36:38.760 --> 01:36:42.800
<v Speaker 9>Sometimes that's in some of the logos apologist speak this way.

1424
01:36:42.800 --> 01:36:46.119
<v Speaker 9>I think Tretoline speaks that way there. Some of that

1425
01:36:46.239 --> 01:36:48.000
<v Speaker 9>could be in the Cappa Docians off the top of

1426
01:36:48.039 --> 01:36:54.640
<v Speaker 9>my head, but yeah, we have I have to look

1427
01:36:54.640 --> 01:36:57.560
<v Speaker 9>at the actual texts. But it depends. So maybe not

1428
01:36:57.720 --> 01:37:00.439
<v Speaker 9>that terminology itself, because you could find and some of that,

1429
01:37:00.600 --> 01:37:04.800
<v Speaker 9>and the early apologists will make usage of that, but

1430
01:37:04.920 --> 01:37:06.720
<v Speaker 9>then they sort of make a lot of mistakes. People

1431
01:37:06.800 --> 01:37:08.600
<v Speaker 9>like tation and people like that, So we have to

1432
01:37:08.640 --> 01:37:10.399
<v Speaker 9>be really careful that or have to see the exact

1433
01:37:10.680 --> 01:37:15.079
<v Speaker 9>the way that they do appropriate the psychological analogy of

1434
01:37:15.199 --> 01:37:18.840
<v Speaker 9>mind and will the father mind will breath. This kind

1435
01:37:18.880 --> 01:37:21.319
<v Speaker 9>of stuff is pretty common even in the Eastern Fathers

1436
01:37:22.079 --> 01:37:25.000
<v Speaker 9>but the problem is that they still couch it within

1437
01:37:25.720 --> 01:37:30.600
<v Speaker 9>the context of Orthodox theology and Christology, whereas in Roman Catholicism,

1438
01:37:30.800 --> 01:37:33.520
<v Speaker 9>or in what we're seeing here, because you get a

1439
01:37:33.680 --> 01:37:38.000
<v Speaker 9>and oftentimes a smushing of nature into person, of properties

1440
01:37:38.039 --> 01:37:41.520
<v Speaker 9>into essence, of energy into essence. That's where it starts

1441
01:37:41.520 --> 01:37:45.439
<v Speaker 9>to become problematic because now we're getting we're confusing the

1442
01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:48.560
<v Speaker 9>energies of the Godhead with the persons. Right, So the

1443
01:37:48.640 --> 01:37:51.560
<v Speaker 9>Spirit is the love of God in a strict identity.

1444
01:37:51.880 --> 01:37:55.960
<v Speaker 9>You see, the logos is quite literally the reason of

1445
01:37:56.000 --> 01:37:58.600
<v Speaker 9>the Father and not the manifestation of the reason of

1446
01:37:58.640 --> 01:38:01.920
<v Speaker 9>the Godhead. Because reason, if we're talking to the divine

1447
01:38:01.960 --> 01:38:04.520
<v Speaker 9>mind here. Okay, mind is a property of nature. So

1448
01:38:04.600 --> 01:38:09.840
<v Speaker 9>all three hypostases possess the divine mind. So the Son,

1449
01:38:10.079 --> 01:38:14.000
<v Speaker 9>in a unique mode manifest He manifests in his unique

1450
01:38:14.039 --> 01:38:16.479
<v Speaker 9>mode the mind of God, as does the Spirit, and

1451
01:38:16.560 --> 01:38:20.000
<v Speaker 9>as does the Father. But we wouldn't identify the logos

1452
01:38:20.079 --> 01:38:22.760
<v Speaker 9>with the mind of God in a strict identification. Does

1453
01:38:22.800 --> 01:38:24.720
<v Speaker 9>that make sense? So you see the same problem here

1454
01:38:24.880 --> 01:38:27.039
<v Speaker 9>is just once again in a lot of these errors

1455
01:38:27.079 --> 01:38:29.199
<v Speaker 9>and heresies, whether it's Roman Catholics and whether it's these

1456
01:38:29.239 --> 01:38:36.079
<v Speaker 9>guys the mistake is to reduce essences or natures, or

1457
01:38:36.279 --> 01:38:41.039
<v Speaker 9>beings or persons to their properties or to their faculties.

1458
01:38:43.319 --> 01:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, And the final thing that I was going

1459
01:38:45.880 --> 01:38:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to add is is about another concept that Jacob speaks.

1460
01:38:51.399 --> 01:38:55.079
<v Speaker 1>This is very interesting because he says, I believe thiss.

1461
01:38:55.079 --> 01:38:59.119
<v Speaker 1>In Hobbily one twenty five, he says, before the created things,

1462
01:38:59.199 --> 01:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the father sealed the image of his son, and ford

1463
01:39:02.199 --> 01:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>formed him and showed how he will shine among the

1464
01:39:04.600 --> 01:39:07.439
<v Speaker 1>earthly beings. The father looked at the image of his

1465
01:39:07.600 --> 01:39:11.359
<v Speaker 1>son and formed Adam. Because of this, he said, he said,

1466
01:39:11.479 --> 01:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>let us make man in our image, in this image

1467
01:39:14.039 --> 01:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the child of Mary, the only begone. So we

1468
01:39:16.800 --> 01:39:18.439
<v Speaker 1>will say that we have made an image of God.

1469
01:39:18.520 --> 01:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But Jacob actually Harmly hundred and twenty five is saying

1470
01:39:22.680 --> 01:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that we're made in the image of Christ. We particularly

1471
01:39:25.359 --> 01:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>made the image of the incarnate Christ. So God sees

1472
01:39:28.960 --> 01:39:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the future, sees the Christ, and sees Christ in the

1473
01:39:32.199 --> 01:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>future and forms your image based on him. And I

1474
01:39:37.560 --> 01:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>would say this is interesting, but it also denies that

1475
01:39:39.720 --> 01:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we're made in the image of the triune grad. So

1476
01:39:41.680 --> 01:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this has a huge problem in the theologist. Jacob and

1477
01:39:48.479 --> 01:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I will say this all of this stuff will be

1478
01:39:52.880 --> 01:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard for me to recap. But all of this

1479
01:39:55.000 --> 01:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff is pretty much what I had to talk about today,

1480
01:39:58.920 --> 01:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>unless you have something else to add in, something else

1481
01:40:01.560 --> 01:40:04.359
<v Speaker 1>that you want me to talk about, which we can

1482
01:40:04.560 --> 01:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>or if we could go to the super chants. What

1483
01:40:05.920 --> 01:40:06.439
<v Speaker 1>do you say, Jay?

1484
01:40:07.760 --> 01:40:09.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I want to remind you by that if you

1485
01:40:09.520 --> 01:40:12.920
<v Speaker 9>want more on this, you can subscribe to David's channel.

1486
01:40:13.399 --> 01:40:16.760
<v Speaker 9>He has a really extensive analysis in his most recent

1487
01:40:17.800 --> 01:40:21.199
<v Speaker 9>three part series of these issues. I would again stress that,

1488
01:40:21.680 --> 01:40:24.119
<v Speaker 9>so if you do have Got History Dialectic, Volume one,

1489
01:40:25.119 --> 01:40:28.199
<v Speaker 9>this discussion of what we're talking about takes place on

1490
01:40:28.319 --> 01:40:32.880
<v Speaker 9>about page two twenty five, roughly up to the end

1491
01:40:32.920 --> 01:40:36.600
<v Speaker 9>of the book, where he talks about these faculties and

1492
01:40:36.680 --> 01:40:40.359
<v Speaker 9>these energies and these wills being in opposition. But that

1493
01:40:40.680 --> 01:40:43.880
<v Speaker 9>is a pretty advanced approach if you're new to this topic.

1494
01:40:44.039 --> 01:40:46.720
<v Speaker 9>I want to stress that the place to begin the

1495
01:40:46.800 --> 01:40:50.039
<v Speaker 9>Christological debates, I wouldn't even say jump to Pope Saint

1496
01:40:50.119 --> 01:40:54.319
<v Speaker 9>Leo's tome. It helps to have this in your mind.

1497
01:40:54.359 --> 01:40:57.640
<v Speaker 9>This is the best introduction to the issues and the

1498
01:40:57.680 --> 01:41:02.680
<v Speaker 9>debates within the storia is because Arianism and Astorianism kick

1499
01:41:02.840 --> 01:41:06.439
<v Speaker 9>off the problems that David is talking about, right, because

1500
01:41:06.479 --> 01:41:10.560
<v Speaker 9>it's Cyril who will use the miaphysis formula, which we

1501
01:41:10.640 --> 01:41:13.600
<v Speaker 9>would read in an orthodox way to mean not a

1502
01:41:13.720 --> 01:41:16.800
<v Speaker 9>denial of the retaining of the two properties of the

1503
01:41:16.840 --> 01:41:22.520
<v Speaker 9>two natures. I would also recommend after the Syrial book,

1504
01:41:22.960 --> 01:41:25.760
<v Speaker 9>or you could start with this one, please read the

1505
01:41:25.840 --> 01:41:27.640
<v Speaker 9>Bradshaw book if you really want to get into these

1506
01:41:27.680 --> 01:41:29.920
<v Speaker 9>topics and read the whole book. Don't read the first

1507
01:41:29.960 --> 01:41:32.720
<v Speaker 9>half of it just about Aristotle, because he will get

1508
01:41:32.840 --> 01:41:39.439
<v Speaker 9>up into the conclusions of these issues, all the way

1509
01:41:39.520 --> 01:41:44.800
<v Speaker 9>into Augustine and into Aquinas and the contrasting of Palamas

1510
01:41:44.840 --> 01:41:49.239
<v Speaker 9>and Aquinas, and the contrasting of Saint Maximus in terms

1511
01:41:49.279 --> 01:41:51.319
<v Speaker 9>of the logos and the logi, and how that's not

1512
01:41:51.479 --> 01:41:53.359
<v Speaker 9>the same thing as what you get in the Latin tradition.

1513
01:41:54.319 --> 01:41:58.479
<v Speaker 9>Bradshaw one of the authorities on these topics, right, He's

1514
01:41:59.399 --> 01:42:02.279
<v Speaker 9>everything you've ever heard me say is really just echoing

1515
01:42:02.319 --> 01:42:05.600
<v Speaker 9>what Bradshaw has said. And Bradshaw is going to vindicate

1516
01:42:05.680 --> 01:42:08.000
<v Speaker 9>all the stuff that David just said. Now he's not

1517
01:42:08.119 --> 01:42:10.199
<v Speaker 9>talking about the oriental issues. But what I'm trying to

1518
01:42:10.239 --> 01:42:14.399
<v Speaker 9>tell you is that the philosophical assumptions that underlie the

1519
01:42:14.479 --> 01:42:17.880
<v Speaker 9>debate of all the Orientals in the Monophysite blah blah blah,

1520
01:42:17.920 --> 01:42:19.720
<v Speaker 9>all that stuff up into the Mono Thelites and the

1521
01:42:19.760 --> 01:42:23.399
<v Speaker 9>Mono Innergists is the same philosophical assumptions that this book

1522
01:42:23.479 --> 01:42:26.520
<v Speaker 9>is about, all the way up into Severus. So these

1523
01:42:26.560 --> 01:42:29.880
<v Speaker 9>are crucial texts. They're very key. And if you read

1524
01:42:29.920 --> 01:42:32.680
<v Speaker 9>these texts and you understand them, I highly recommend it.

1525
01:42:32.760 --> 01:42:36.520
<v Speaker 9>Please read the David Bradshaw book. The Frail book is great,

1526
01:42:36.560 --> 01:42:39.199
<v Speaker 9>but it's a little more advanced, right, And if you

1527
01:42:39.239 --> 01:42:41.560
<v Speaker 9>don't want to go into that, just read the Dispute

1528
01:42:41.600 --> 01:42:43.960
<v Speaker 9>with Purists. You'll see all the stuff that you've heard

1529
01:42:44.079 --> 01:42:46.520
<v Speaker 9>me say for all these years, all this stuff I

1530
01:42:46.640 --> 01:42:50.000
<v Speaker 9>constantly repeat. I mean, it's all right here. I'm not

1531
01:42:50.119 --> 01:42:52.399
<v Speaker 9>making this stuff up. I mean, David, let me ask

1532
01:42:52.439 --> 01:42:56.000
<v Speaker 9>you a question. So a year ago, when you and

1533
01:42:56.079 --> 01:42:58.039
<v Speaker 9>I started interacting a lot on my discord and we

1534
01:42:58.119 --> 01:43:00.359
<v Speaker 9>were having a lot of these discussions. I'm not just

1535
01:43:00.439 --> 01:43:02.119
<v Speaker 9>trying to tellt myself, but I wanted to get your

1536
01:43:03.359 --> 01:43:07.199
<v Speaker 9>account of this. Now that you have doved, dived, diven,

1537
01:43:08.079 --> 01:43:12.079
<v Speaker 9>you've jumped into this issue for the last year, would

1538
01:43:12.119 --> 01:43:15.720
<v Speaker 9>you say that you see the symphony of the topics

1539
01:43:15.840 --> 01:43:19.000
<v Speaker 9>that I originally was arguing with you, not that you

1540
01:43:19.079 --> 01:43:21.920
<v Speaker 9>were disagreeing, but trying to explain to you a year ago.

1541
01:43:22.279 --> 01:43:24.600
<v Speaker 9>Does it not seem to cohere? Do the issues not

1542
01:43:24.720 --> 01:43:28.159
<v Speaker 9>make sense? Does it not? Does it not make sense?

1543
01:43:28.239 --> 01:43:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Now? Obviously it does. I mean one of the first

1544
01:43:32.600 --> 01:43:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I could give you an example when it came to

1545
01:43:34.920 --> 01:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the essence and ES's distinction. A mistake I made, for example,

1546
01:43:37.880 --> 01:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is that I looked at like the issue so much

1547
01:43:39.920 --> 01:43:44.159
<v Speaker 1>how to mine essence energies distinction the fathers. But once

1548
01:43:44.239 --> 01:43:47.479
<v Speaker 1>you read the Fathers, for example, the principle, you talk

1549
01:43:47.560 --> 01:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot about distinction, not meaning composition or division. I

1550
01:43:52.479 --> 01:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>see it in any like in Christology regularly right as

1551
01:43:56.600 --> 01:43:59.479
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the things you talk about or the things

1552
01:43:59.560 --> 01:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Orthodox Church fathers talk about. I don't see that,

1553
01:44:03.079 --> 01:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, intomism. I don't see any toomism in the

1554
01:44:06.079 --> 01:44:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Church Fathers. I do see a lot of the stuff

1555
01:44:08.439 --> 01:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>that you told me you were talking about.

1556
01:44:10.720 --> 01:44:12.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, there's a whole section in here about how the

1557
01:44:13.119 --> 01:44:15.880
<v Speaker 9>logi are not the same thing as Augustine's exemplars, and

1558
01:44:15.880 --> 01:44:20.399
<v Speaker 9>Augustine's exemplar doctrine passes directly into Thomas Aquinas. Yes, Thomas

1559
01:44:20.439 --> 01:44:24.399
<v Speaker 9>Aquinas has differences with Augustine on the doctrine of illumination.

1560
01:44:24.479 --> 01:44:27.159
<v Speaker 9>They have two different notions of divine illumination. It doesn't

1561
01:44:27.159 --> 01:44:29.399
<v Speaker 9>really matter because the Doctor of simplicity is exactly the

1562
01:44:29.479 --> 01:44:34.479
<v Speaker 9>same and so therefore the exemplar doctrine of the Latin

1563
01:44:34.600 --> 01:44:36.920
<v Speaker 9>Church is not the same thing as the Logi doctrine,

1564
01:44:36.960 --> 01:44:40.159
<v Speaker 9>and so therefore natural theology in the Tomistic sense is

1565
01:44:40.239 --> 01:44:42.880
<v Speaker 9>not and cannot be the Orthodox position.

1566
01:44:44.600 --> 01:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. And what I was going to add, but I

1567
01:44:48.560 --> 01:44:49.479
<v Speaker 1>wanted to thank you, David.

1568
01:44:49.520 --> 01:44:54.159
<v Speaker 9>So let's now that you've dived into these issues, would

1569
01:44:54.199 --> 01:44:56.439
<v Speaker 9>you agree Where would you start if you wanted to

1570
01:44:56.560 --> 01:44:59.000
<v Speaker 9>really research the topic, Like what have you found to

1571
01:44:59.079 --> 01:45:02.760
<v Speaker 9>be the most kind of beneficial, advantageous.

1572
01:45:02.079 --> 01:45:09.079
<v Speaker 1>Works and in regards to Oriental like Anticulcidonian theology, Okay,

1573
01:45:09.199 --> 01:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of disputing like in terms of disputes, obviously,

1574
01:45:12.600 --> 01:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>start with the Father and McCain book. That's what I

1575
01:45:14.359 --> 01:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>started with. After reading that, I think I read God

1576
01:45:18.720 --> 01:45:22.119
<v Speaker 1>History Dialected to get more scope, but it's kind of unrelated.

1577
01:45:22.159 --> 01:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of arguments that I got is from God

1578
01:45:24.720 --> 01:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>History Dialected. But I will say, it depends on what

1579
01:45:28.680 --> 01:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about. So for example, if you want to

1580
01:45:32.199 --> 01:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're worried about specific points, like in my case,

1581
01:45:36.319 --> 01:45:39.119
<v Speaker 1>when I start to understand Orthodox theology a lot more,

1582
01:45:39.880 --> 01:45:42.359
<v Speaker 1>what I did, for example, is that I looked into

1583
01:45:42.439 --> 01:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>certain characters like Theodore It of Cyrus. For example, I

1584
01:45:45.399 --> 01:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>read Ernistus by Theodore It of Cyrus, and that really

1585
01:45:48.960 --> 01:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>helped me a lot, because I saw the things that

1586
01:45:51.720 --> 01:45:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Saint kill said in him, and it really helped me

1587
01:45:54.159 --> 01:45:57.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot. If you want like direct, if you want

1588
01:45:57.079 --> 01:46:02.079
<v Speaker 1>diaphysicism in the Church Fathers and this currently Calcadonian argumentation,

1589
01:46:02.399 --> 01:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I will recommend you to check out Leonti's of Jerusalems

1590
01:46:04.960 --> 01:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>against them onoph Sizes. I did a book review of

1591
01:46:07.079 --> 01:46:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that in part three of the of the video series.

1592
01:46:12.399 --> 01:46:15.399
<v Speaker 1>If you want to understand sever in theology like what

1593
01:46:15.600 --> 01:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Servus himself says, I think you can go to first

1594
01:46:18.279 --> 01:46:22.199
<v Speaker 1>hand sources if you understand the terminology. So the best

1595
01:46:22.239 --> 01:46:24.239
<v Speaker 1>book you can get is that Robert the Chestnut book

1596
01:46:24.279 --> 01:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The trem on off site Christologies. You can get Serrus

1597
01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of Antioch book on Servius of Antioch by Paulin Allen.

1598
01:46:31.640 --> 01:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>If you want to read him directly. If you want

1599
01:46:34.680 --> 01:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to read about the Council of Kalkadon, I would have

1600
01:46:38.079 --> 01:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>said the Defense of the Kalkadon the Defense of the

1601
01:46:41.640 --> 01:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Council of Calculu in the East by Patrick Gray will

1602
01:46:43.920 --> 01:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>be great. The problem is there's only like three books

1603
01:46:47.399 --> 01:46:50.399
<v Speaker 1>available online and the cheapest one is like seventy seven dollars,

1604
01:46:50.439 --> 01:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think that's possible. That's why I'm probably

1605
01:46:52.920 --> 01:46:56.720
<v Speaker 1>going to try the book review of that sometime. But

1606
01:46:57.520 --> 01:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>if you want to read about the Counts of Calculu,

1607
01:46:59.319 --> 01:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you can read the Acts of the Council of Kalkadon.

1608
01:47:03.399 --> 01:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And oh yeah, there's also I didn't read it yet,

1609
01:47:06.640 --> 01:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think The Byzantine Christ by Demetrius Patrellos is

1610
01:47:10.640 --> 01:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>also relevant to this basically any any if you look

1611
01:47:15.359 --> 01:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>at my announcement stream, I cite all of the books

1612
01:47:18.319 --> 01:47:21.119
<v Speaker 1>that I read and I will be using in in

1613
01:47:21.279 --> 01:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the in the future, in the future videos I will

1614
01:47:23.680 --> 01:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>be making, which I made like all of them basically

1615
01:47:26.079 --> 01:47:30.159
<v Speaker 1>right now, including this one. Those books are what you

1616
01:47:30.359 --> 01:47:33.399
<v Speaker 1>should be looking for, I think, and it's very important

1617
01:47:33.439 --> 01:47:40.039
<v Speaker 1>to understand these clearly Culcadonian theology and theological theological points

1618
01:47:40.079 --> 01:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>because it will help, It will actually change the debate

1619
01:47:42.800 --> 01:47:45.279
<v Speaker 1>for you. For me, the first time I heard arguments,

1620
01:47:46.079 --> 01:47:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought they meant nature is is Ussia, and that's

1621
01:47:50.439 --> 01:47:52.359
<v Speaker 1>what I kind of I was kind of complacent. I

1622
01:47:52.520 --> 01:47:55.199
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, you know, it's so silly that they

1623
01:47:55.239 --> 01:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>will believe that Cristi is only divide haha. And then

1624
01:47:58.520 --> 01:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>understanding these things, understand this debate, help me really get

1625
01:48:03.640 --> 01:48:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the debate. And that's the best thing you can do,

1626
01:48:07.760 --> 01:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>because many people, except for me and Jay, I think

1627
01:48:11.680 --> 01:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like they won't really be helpful in this regard. There

1628
01:48:14.680 --> 01:48:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you will either hear like arguments that are that are

1629
01:48:19.960 --> 01:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>straw men that don't represent the oriental position will or

1630
01:48:24.479 --> 01:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you will hear arguments saying, oh, be actually believe the

1631
01:48:27.039 --> 01:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>same thing. So basically two groups of people that don't

1632
01:48:29.359 --> 01:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really understand what's going on will say all of this stuff.

1633
01:48:33.079 --> 01:48:36.039
<v Speaker 1>And so the books that I mentioned in parts here,

1634
01:48:36.159 --> 01:48:40.119
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you should read all of them, I think, but

1635
01:48:40.279 --> 01:48:43.359
<v Speaker 1>if you want in order, if you're like completely, if

1636
01:48:43.439 --> 01:48:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any knowledge, the Alexandra book by far

1637
01:48:46.920 --> 01:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>John McGuckin is great. And then I will say for me,

1638
01:48:53.079 --> 01:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Goddess to Dialectic book was really it

1639
01:48:56.760 --> 01:48:59.439
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as advanced as I think it will be. I

1640
01:48:59.600 --> 01:49:01.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of understood a lot of this stuff, but maybe

1641
01:49:01.920 --> 01:49:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that's because I kind of expected some of the stuff

1642
01:49:04.920 --> 01:49:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to be said there, old lady. But I think that

1643
01:49:06.560 --> 01:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>will also like, because if you don't understand general Christology,

1644
01:49:11.119 --> 01:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a very hard time read getting

1645
01:49:14.960 --> 01:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the arguments that many for Saints make. Now

1646
01:49:17.760 --> 01:49:19.720
<v Speaker 1>let's say, yes, book would be great.

1647
01:49:19.840 --> 01:49:23.039
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I would say if you want a introduction to

1648
01:49:23.560 --> 01:49:26.119
<v Speaker 9>the bigger picture here, And I'm thinking about doing a

1649
01:49:26.279 --> 01:49:29.760
<v Speaker 9>lecture just on this because I found my old notes.

1650
01:49:29.840 --> 01:49:32.079
<v Speaker 9>I took about one hundred pages of notes ten years

1651
01:49:32.119 --> 01:49:37.399
<v Speaker 9>ago on multiple works that relate to this topic. So

1652
01:49:37.439 --> 01:49:40.960
<v Speaker 9>I actually have a whole folder here. It's just nothing

1653
01:49:41.039 --> 01:49:43.600
<v Speaker 9>but my one hundred pages of notes that I took

1654
01:49:43.720 --> 01:49:49.640
<v Speaker 9>on the Pelicon series. The Pelicon series is great, so

1655
01:49:49.960 --> 01:49:54.039
<v Speaker 9>it covers we're mainly only concerned with like the first

1656
01:49:54.199 --> 01:49:56.439
<v Speaker 9>you know, thousand years and then into the Middle Ages,

1657
01:49:56.479 --> 01:49:59.640
<v Speaker 9>so we're not really concerned with modern Protestantism in modern theology.

1658
01:49:59.720 --> 01:50:02.319
<v Speaker 9>The two in this it's a five volume series, but

1659
01:50:02.439 --> 01:50:04.319
<v Speaker 9>the first three of the Pelicons that are really good.

1660
01:50:04.840 --> 01:50:06.920
<v Speaker 9>So I think in the near future. We will also

1661
01:50:07.119 --> 01:50:10.840
<v Speaker 9>do an analysis from one hundred pages of notes I took.

1662
01:50:10.920 --> 01:50:15.720
<v Speaker 9>And then if somebody wants another, let's say I had

1663
01:50:15.760 --> 01:50:20.399
<v Speaker 9>another introductory Yeah, another introductory book to these topics is

1664
01:50:20.479 --> 01:50:24.800
<v Speaker 9>also Pelican's Christianity and Classical Culture, right, And so yes,

1665
01:50:24.920 --> 01:50:27.760
<v Speaker 9>he will talk a lot about natural law. He will

1666
01:50:27.840 --> 01:50:31.039
<v Speaker 9>talk a lot about the principles of nature, as does

1667
01:50:31.079 --> 01:50:33.840
<v Speaker 9>Saint Maximus. But does that mean the same thing as Thomism, right,

1668
01:50:33.960 --> 01:50:36.119
<v Speaker 9>So no, it's not word concept fallacy. So if you

1669
01:50:36.159 --> 01:50:40.239
<v Speaker 9>want maybe a broader perspective to start with these topics,

1670
01:50:40.359 --> 01:50:42.600
<v Speaker 9>these are the books that I would recommend. And then,

1671
01:50:42.640 --> 01:50:46.880
<v Speaker 9>of course, don't forget the Saint Justinian himself has a

1672
01:50:46.960 --> 01:50:48.960
<v Speaker 9>great work on the person of Christ.

1673
01:50:50.279 --> 01:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's actually a good point.

1674
01:50:53.079 --> 01:50:56.640
<v Speaker 9>So those are all are all good. And then let's

1675
01:50:56.680 --> 01:50:59.479
<v Speaker 9>look at some of the super chats that.

1676
01:50:59.520 --> 01:50:59.960
<v Speaker 7>We have here.

1677
01:51:01.560 --> 01:51:05.239
<v Speaker 9>I got stacks of books falling over here. All right,

1678
01:51:05.319 --> 01:51:13.199
<v Speaker 9>let's see we've got a few here. Robert Taylor five dollars,

1679
01:51:13.720 --> 01:51:17.640
<v Speaker 9>not the previous Robert Taylor, the different Robert Taylor. I

1680
01:51:17.720 --> 01:51:21.439
<v Speaker 9>read the Hoffman's Cult Renaissance Church of Rome, and he

1681
01:51:21.560 --> 01:51:25.399
<v Speaker 9>complements orthodox ecclesiology and iconography yeah, well, this is the

1682
01:51:26.840 --> 01:51:29.920
<v Speaker 9>ecclesiology and iconography of the first millennium is what you

1683
01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:32.720
<v Speaker 9>see in the Seventh Ecumenical Council. So actually, if you

1684
01:51:32.800 --> 01:51:36.840
<v Speaker 9>read the Sonoticon of Orthodoxy, it's a great refutation of

1685
01:51:37.359 --> 01:51:42.279
<v Speaker 9>seeing how the Roman Catholic Church canonically departed from what

1686
01:51:42.439 --> 01:51:45.720
<v Speaker 9>we have in the Seventh Synod. And again, somebody should

1687
01:51:45.760 --> 01:51:50.439
<v Speaker 9>find out if Uniates affirm the Sonoticon, because that would

1688
01:51:50.439 --> 01:51:52.960
<v Speaker 9>be another great argument if I can find this out.

1689
01:51:53.720 --> 01:51:56.880
<v Speaker 9>If Uniates do affirm the Sonoticon of Orthodoxy from the

1690
01:51:56.920 --> 01:52:02.119
<v Speaker 9>Seventh Synod, then yeah, that's just one of many, many

1691
01:52:02.319 --> 01:52:06.399
<v Speaker 9>Roman Catholic contradictions. But yes, I do think occult Renaissance

1692
01:52:06.439 --> 01:52:09.159
<v Speaker 9>stretch of Rome showed me a lot of things that

1693
01:52:09.239 --> 01:52:11.199
<v Speaker 9>I missed about the Renaissance. So it's a really good

1694
01:52:11.239 --> 01:52:17.880
<v Speaker 9>analysis of the second millennium. His severe lack, of course,

1695
01:52:18.159 --> 01:52:22.920
<v Speaker 9>is not knowing about the first millennium, as is unfortunately

1696
01:52:22.960 --> 01:52:27.520
<v Speaker 9>the case with many Roman Catholics. So he says blessed Lin,

1697
01:52:28.720 --> 01:52:32.119
<v Speaker 9>and he is citing the book saying Rome defected in

1698
01:52:32.199 --> 01:52:35.640
<v Speaker 9>the thirteenth century. Yeah. I mean, you could have different

1699
01:52:35.760 --> 01:52:38.239
<v Speaker 9>arguments as to exactly where to pinpoint the date, because

1700
01:52:38.239 --> 01:52:42.119
<v Speaker 9>it's more of a long flowering of a movement all

1701
01:52:42.119 --> 01:52:45.159
<v Speaker 9>the way back to the time of Augustine. Again, I'm

1702
01:52:45.319 --> 01:52:49.159
<v Speaker 9>really I'm tired of debating this issue. So read the

1703
01:52:49.199 --> 01:52:51.560
<v Speaker 9>Bradshaw book. The chapter on Augustine is really good. It

1704
01:52:51.720 --> 01:52:54.920
<v Speaker 9>just really solidifies it in a just a really clear

1705
01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:57.760
<v Speaker 9>way in a brief chapter. So we shouldn't have to

1706
01:52:57.840 --> 01:53:00.119
<v Speaker 9>keep debating these topics. It's pretty easy to understand if

1707
01:53:00.159 --> 01:53:03.760
<v Speaker 9>you read these works. But so there's a development. It's

1708
01:53:03.800 --> 01:53:07.319
<v Speaker 9>not necessarily we're not saying Gustin is evil. He made

1709
01:53:07.359 --> 01:53:10.079
<v Speaker 9>some mistakes, as did Saint Gregor Nissa other people. Saint

1710
01:53:10.119 --> 01:53:13.319
<v Speaker 9>Maximus correct mistakes and errors that sing Gregor Nissa made,

1711
01:53:13.560 --> 01:53:16.920
<v Speaker 9>So there's nothing wrong with us. We don't follow one dude.

1712
01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:23.199
<v Speaker 9>We follow the consensum, consensus, patrum right consensus of the fathers.

1713
01:53:23.880 --> 01:53:27.560
<v Speaker 9>So I would say, go easy, don't rush into these topics,

1714
01:53:27.680 --> 01:53:31.039
<v Speaker 9>take your time, it'll become evident. And yes, there is

1715
01:53:31.079 --> 01:53:33.960
<v Speaker 9>a good historical critique of the Renaissance in that book.

1716
01:53:35.039 --> 01:53:37.680
<v Speaker 9>Franklin Chan nineteen ninety nine. Thank you for all your work, Jay,

1717
01:53:37.720 --> 01:53:39.399
<v Speaker 9>and thank you for your great guest.

1718
01:53:39.479 --> 01:53:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Well.

1719
01:53:39.760 --> 01:53:42.079
<v Speaker 9>Yes, David has done a tremendous amount of work he

1720
01:53:42.199 --> 01:53:45.520
<v Speaker 9>has learned at a lightning speed the last year on

1721
01:53:45.680 --> 01:53:48.640
<v Speaker 9>these topics. So definitely subscribe to David's channel down there

1722
01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:52.399
<v Speaker 9>and you will get some based solid Christology there and

1723
01:53:52.560 --> 01:53:55.199
<v Speaker 9>hopefully we can have I think David wants to. Is

1724
01:53:55.279 --> 01:53:56.560
<v Speaker 9>trying to get a debate going?

1725
01:53:56.680 --> 01:53:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Right?

1726
01:53:56.840 --> 01:53:58.119
<v Speaker 9>Are you trying to get a debate with somebody?

1727
01:53:58.920 --> 01:54:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I just got a debate. If it's a person

1728
01:54:01.960 --> 01:54:08.159
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter seven Zella's will be debating on Bright Saturday,

1729
01:54:08.359 --> 01:54:12.159
<v Speaker 1>on Bright's Week. I decided to debate him because he

1730
01:54:12.319 --> 01:54:15.720
<v Speaker 1>represents the position very well and I think he knows

1731
01:54:15.760 --> 01:54:18.720
<v Speaker 1>his stuff, unlike many of the people in my part

1732
01:54:18.760 --> 01:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>two I said, I declared a debate to Farrington, but

1733
01:54:24.159 --> 01:54:27.399
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook he said stupid stuff like, oh, I studied

1734
01:54:27.439 --> 01:54:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff for thirty years and we believe in the

1735
01:54:30.000 --> 01:54:32.039
<v Speaker 1>same thing. So I'm not taking seriously if he's going

1736
01:54:32.079 --> 01:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to say stuff like that. But yeah, I'll have a

1737
01:54:35.079 --> 01:54:40.079
<v Speaker 1>debate in two months about this exact issue, so tune

1738
01:54:40.119 --> 01:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>in for that. It's going to be great, all right.

1739
01:54:43.359 --> 01:54:45.359
<v Speaker 9>EML says for ten dollars, Thank you, by the way,

1740
01:54:45.359 --> 01:54:49.199
<v Speaker 9>Franklin for that. I'm much appreciated. mL says for ten dollars.

1741
01:54:49.720 --> 01:54:53.560
<v Speaker 9>In the disputation with Puis, I think it's paragraph four

1742
01:54:54.840 --> 01:54:58.560
<v Speaker 9>Maximus claims that the distinctions in Christ are effectively virtual.

1743
01:54:59.159 --> 01:55:01.079
<v Speaker 9>I don't have book in front of me, but I've

1744
01:55:01.079 --> 01:55:03.199
<v Speaker 9>struggled with that. Well, this is just similar to the

1745
01:55:03.319 --> 01:55:07.880
<v Speaker 9>notion that that we've talked about in the past, with

1746
01:55:08.159 --> 01:55:11.000
<v Speaker 9>Saint Cyril saying the same thing. He's just echoing. And

1747
01:55:11.119 --> 01:55:13.319
<v Speaker 9>this is a response to people who think that because

1748
01:55:13.359 --> 01:55:17.680
<v Speaker 9>you make a distinction, that therefore it's a division. So again,

1749
01:55:18.079 --> 01:55:22.199
<v Speaker 9>remember the dictum that making distinctions does not entail composition

1750
01:55:22.359 --> 01:55:26.319
<v Speaker 9>or division. Sometimes a distinction might entail composition. For example,

1751
01:55:26.359 --> 01:55:29.119
<v Speaker 9>we make a distinction between body and soul and humans.

1752
01:55:29.640 --> 01:55:32.359
<v Speaker 9>In humans, body and soul is composite. Right, It is

1753
01:55:32.479 --> 01:55:35.720
<v Speaker 9>a composite thing because it's a creation that is brought

1754
01:55:35.760 --> 01:55:37.680
<v Speaker 9>together when God creates us. Right, we have a body,

1755
01:55:37.720 --> 01:55:41.479
<v Speaker 9>we have a soul, and so in humans, though in

1756
01:55:41.600 --> 01:55:45.000
<v Speaker 9>the way that we actually are, it's uniteed. Right, the

1757
01:55:45.079 --> 01:55:47.880
<v Speaker 9>body suffuses the soul, the soul suffuses the body. In

1758
01:55:47.920 --> 01:55:50.520
<v Speaker 9>the argumentation of many of the Church fathers. So when

1759
01:55:50.560 --> 01:55:53.920
<v Speaker 9>we talk about making a distinction, right, and we say

1760
01:55:53.960 --> 01:55:56.960
<v Speaker 9>that it's a virtual distinction, that doesn't mean that the

1761
01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:00.600
<v Speaker 9>distinction isn't also real. It's in the context of in

1762
01:56:00.760 --> 01:56:04.399
<v Speaker 9>theology making the distinction, right. Saint John Damascus makes the

1763
01:56:04.439 --> 01:56:06.920
<v Speaker 9>same argument in the Exposition of Orthodox Faith, where he

1764
01:56:06.920 --> 01:56:10.159
<v Speaker 9>says that just because we make a virtual distinction does

1765
01:56:10.239 --> 01:56:12.720
<v Speaker 9>not mean that we make a division. It also doesn't

1766
01:56:12.760 --> 01:56:16.680
<v Speaker 9>mean that there isn't a real distinction. Right, So you

1767
01:56:16.800 --> 01:56:19.399
<v Speaker 9>can say both that there's a virtual distinction and a

1768
01:56:19.479 --> 01:56:20.119
<v Speaker 9>real distinction.

1769
01:56:21.960 --> 01:56:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Can I add something on that show.

1770
01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:26.359
<v Speaker 9>I'm gonna pull up the paragraph that he that he's mentioning,

1771
01:56:26.399 --> 01:56:26.840
<v Speaker 9>but go ahead.

1772
01:56:27.840 --> 01:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. This is relevant with Saint Curle when he's

1773
01:56:30.760 --> 01:56:34.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about like the two nature into Nature's formula being acceptable.

1774
01:56:34.399 --> 01:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So for Saint Kurle, for example, if you make a

1775
01:56:36.640 --> 01:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>distinction in concrete, it leads to Nestorianism because you're making

1776
01:56:40.720 --> 01:56:44.039
<v Speaker 1>a concrete distinction and you're separating them, right, And so

1777
01:56:44.159 --> 01:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he says that we make this distinction in according to

1778
01:56:47.520 --> 01:56:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of the soul. Now, this doesn't mean a

1779
01:56:49.399 --> 01:56:53.359
<v Speaker 1>mere conceptual distinction inside our heads. This is still based

1780
01:56:53.439 --> 01:56:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on reality, but it is the wavy understanding distinction is

1781
01:56:57.960 --> 01:57:00.479
<v Speaker 1>what is highlighted here, and this is exactly what the

1782
01:57:00.520 --> 01:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Kalcadonian definition. Boy, it does when they say that Christ

1783
01:57:03.359 --> 01:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is into natures, it says according to the intellect, which

1784
01:57:06.640 --> 01:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what Saint Chrios is in his second letter

1785
01:57:09.039 --> 01:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to Seqensis. So again, this claimed that Kalkadon believes in

1786
01:57:13.640 --> 01:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this story in theology is patently false. It's absolutely yeah.

1787
01:57:17.640 --> 01:57:20.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean, if you couldn't make distinctions after the incarnation,

1788
01:57:20.800 --> 01:57:22.760
<v Speaker 9>which is what some of them argue, then you couldn't

1789
01:57:22.760 --> 01:57:26.000
<v Speaker 9>have John Damascus having a whole chapter explaining what happens

1790
01:57:26.119 --> 01:57:29.600
<v Speaker 9>in the descent of Christ into Hades, because he makes

1791
01:57:29.720 --> 01:57:34.239
<v Speaker 9>all of these very precise distinctions about how the human

1792
01:57:34.520 --> 01:57:37.880
<v Speaker 9>soul was severed from the human body and descended into Hades. Right,

1793
01:57:37.920 --> 01:57:39.840
<v Speaker 9>Does that mean that he's dividing Christ? Of course not.

1794
01:57:40.840 --> 01:57:43.159
<v Speaker 9>Is it a virtual distinction yes? Is it also a

1795
01:57:43.239 --> 01:57:45.720
<v Speaker 9>real distinction, yes, So we don't have to set up

1796
01:57:45.760 --> 01:57:47.960
<v Speaker 9>either oars as if there's only one or the others.

1797
01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:50.880
<v Speaker 9>So I'll read one eighty four. Different actions have different effects,

1798
01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:54.119
<v Speaker 9>not on one effect, as was demonstrated by the example

1799
01:57:54.199 --> 01:57:56.079
<v Speaker 9>the sword being hardened by fire. If the operation of

1800
01:57:56.079 --> 01:57:58.800
<v Speaker 9>the sword and that fire are mutually united. And yet

1801
01:57:58.840 --> 01:58:00.960
<v Speaker 9>we observe that the fire's effect is burning the iron,

1802
01:58:01.520 --> 01:58:03.319
<v Speaker 9>and the irons effect is cutting, even though they are

1803
01:58:03.359 --> 01:58:06.039
<v Speaker 9>not distinguished in the burning cut or in the cutting burn,

1804
01:58:06.239 --> 01:58:08.199
<v Speaker 9>just as the effect of heaven or earth. Then it

1805
01:58:08.319 --> 01:58:10.760
<v Speaker 9>is not possible to say that there is one work

1806
01:58:10.920 --> 01:58:14.159
<v Speaker 9>unless there is only one action. If thou has maintained

1807
01:58:14.199 --> 01:58:17.119
<v Speaker 9>that the effect of one energy is several distinction distinct

1808
01:58:17.159 --> 01:58:20.520
<v Speaker 9>works by Christ, then thou must maintain one action. Or

1809
01:58:20.560 --> 01:58:22.920
<v Speaker 9>if thout is teach an innumerable number of actions, then

1810
01:58:22.960 --> 01:58:25.880
<v Speaker 9>thou must also teach that the energies are innumerable. But

1811
01:58:25.960 --> 01:58:28.119
<v Speaker 9>our inquiry is not about the works, whether we're discussing

1812
01:58:28.199 --> 01:58:32.560
<v Speaker 9>things external to Christ, but about things within Christ himself.

1813
01:58:32.600 --> 01:58:34.520
<v Speaker 9>That is to say, about the natural principles of the

1814
01:58:34.680 --> 01:58:38.279
<v Speaker 9>essences of Christ, whether he remained defective from the union

1815
01:58:38.399 --> 01:58:40.560
<v Speaker 9>or not. If he was defective, then it is possible

1816
01:58:40.640 --> 01:58:43.520
<v Speaker 9>for a nature that is defective in a natural energy

1817
01:58:43.560 --> 01:58:46.359
<v Speaker 9>to genuinely exist. If it is not defective, then the

1818
01:58:46.520 --> 01:58:48.840
<v Speaker 9>energy is either understood to be a component or a

1819
01:58:48.920 --> 01:58:51.359
<v Speaker 9>principle of the essence, or it is acquired from those

1820
01:58:51.399 --> 01:58:53.720
<v Speaker 9>things external to him. If the energy is proper to

1821
01:58:53.880 --> 01:58:56.840
<v Speaker 9>nature and it's not acquired from external sources, then it

1822
01:58:56.920 --> 01:59:00.800
<v Speaker 9>is possible for nature to exist, then as possible either

1823
01:59:00.840 --> 01:59:02.680
<v Speaker 9>for a nature that exists without actions or the converse

1824
01:59:02.720 --> 01:59:05.039
<v Speaker 9>to be true. Nature can neither be conceived nor can

1825
01:59:05.159 --> 01:59:07.479
<v Speaker 9>exist without energies proper to it. To believe this is

1826
01:59:07.479 --> 01:59:10.399
<v Speaker 9>to believe that He operates in each nature naturally, and

1827
01:59:10.479 --> 01:59:14.119
<v Speaker 9>that there are not natures that are altered thereby. So

1828
01:59:14.239 --> 01:59:16.399
<v Speaker 9>I don't see unless it's in a footnote, it's not

1829
01:59:16.560 --> 01:59:22.279
<v Speaker 9>one eighty four. But again just because don't think in

1830
01:59:23.319 --> 01:59:25.520
<v Speaker 9>either ors. Just because he says there's a dis like

1831
01:59:25.760 --> 01:59:29.079
<v Speaker 9>we would say that there's a nature person distinction in God. Right,

1832
01:59:29.359 --> 01:59:31.560
<v Speaker 9>Does that mean we're dividing God because we make a

1833
01:59:31.600 --> 01:59:37.159
<v Speaker 9>distinction between nature and person? No, And so after the incarnation,

1834
01:59:37.319 --> 01:59:42.560
<v Speaker 9>can we still make conceptual distinctions about Christ? Absolutely? Does

1835
01:59:42.600 --> 01:59:46.119
<v Speaker 9>the fact that there's conceptual distinctions mean that he's blended

1836
01:59:46.159 --> 01:59:48.840
<v Speaker 9>in a monofsite sense and that there aren't two nature? Still? No,

1837
01:59:49.199 --> 01:59:54.479
<v Speaker 9>because the union is hypostatic, it's hyposthetized. So hopefully that's helpful.

1838
01:59:54.800 --> 01:59:57.720
<v Speaker 9>Let's see. But if you want to put in the chat,

1839
01:59:57.760 --> 01:59:59.560
<v Speaker 9>because it's not one eighty four, if you want to

1840
01:59:59.560 --> 02:00:02.680
<v Speaker 9>pick out the specific paragraph that you that you think

1841
02:00:03.439 --> 02:00:05.199
<v Speaker 9>it might be in where you're talking about. I can

1842
02:00:05.239 --> 02:00:09.760
<v Speaker 9>read that paragraph telegram five bucks. Can you set your

1843
02:00:09.800 --> 02:00:13.119
<v Speaker 9>telegram to public? It's on private, nobody can find it,

1844
02:00:13.319 --> 02:00:16.600
<v Speaker 9>including potential people interested in orthodoxy. Yeah, I'll have to

1845
02:00:16.640 --> 02:00:19.159
<v Speaker 9>do that. I didn't realize it was private, So I'll

1846
02:00:19.199 --> 02:00:20.520
<v Speaker 9>look in there and figure out how.

1847
02:00:20.399 --> 02:00:20.720
<v Speaker 5>To do that.

1848
02:00:22.119 --> 02:00:24.439
<v Speaker 9>All right, So those are the super chats. I don't

1849
02:00:24.439 --> 02:00:27.520
<v Speaker 9>see if we got any more. We didn't have surprised

1850
02:00:27.520 --> 02:00:31.359
<v Speaker 9>we didn't have orientals in here, like making arguments and claims.

1851
02:00:33.079 --> 02:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I kind of expected then. But maybe they'll do

1852
02:00:35.880 --> 02:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it on Facebook.

1853
02:00:36.960 --> 02:00:41.239
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, people nobody wants people. Yeah, people won't directly debate

1854
02:00:41.319 --> 02:00:43.159
<v Speaker 9>or interact everything. Everything that has to do everything in

1855
02:00:43.239 --> 02:00:47.319
<v Speaker 9>some sort of like passive aggressive shooting from the you know,

1856
02:00:47.680 --> 02:00:50.119
<v Speaker 9>behind the screen. Like they won't just ever have a

1857
02:00:50.239 --> 02:00:51.520
<v Speaker 9>full on discussion or debate.

1858
02:00:53.880 --> 02:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of people offerate. That's why I decided

1859
02:00:56.760 --> 02:00:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to do the debate, because I said, you know, this

1860
02:00:58.439 --> 02:01:00.479
<v Speaker 1>is the only guy that does it, so I might

1861
02:01:00.520 --> 02:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>as well give him a chance and we'll I'll have

1862
02:01:04.720 --> 02:01:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a debate about this topic in two months. Hopefully I'll

1863
02:01:09.479 --> 02:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>get a better performance. I'll give it the best performance

1864
02:01:12.039 --> 02:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I can give during a debate. It's been a while

1865
02:01:13.560 --> 02:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>since I did that, but shamelessly plugging myself in here again.

1866
02:01:18.600 --> 02:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>If you like this stuff, if you want to see

1867
02:01:20.319 --> 02:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>more of it, you can always follow my channel. You

1868
02:01:24.119 --> 02:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>can again, if you're interested about Kolkada but you're not

1869
02:01:28.920 --> 02:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>really interested about diaphysicism in the Church Fathers, you can.

1870
02:01:32.319 --> 02:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to watch the videos in a chronological order.

1871
02:01:35.039 --> 02:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>You can watch it anytime in any like. If you

1872
02:01:38.079 --> 02:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>want to watch part three first and then part two

1873
02:01:40.039 --> 02:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and then part one, that's fine. That's fine. So yeah,

1874
02:01:44.119 --> 02:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that's all I have to say. I think awesome.

1875
02:01:49.079 --> 02:01:51.720
<v Speaker 9>All right, thank you guys. We'll have another stream tonight.

1876
02:01:52.239 --> 02:01:55.079
<v Speaker 9>Our friend Mark Hackard is coming back. We haven't talked

1877
02:01:55.119 --> 02:01:57.520
<v Speaker 9>to Mark in a long time, and he's put out

1878
02:01:57.560 --> 02:02:00.920
<v Speaker 9>some pretty bomb articles lately. One of them is out

1879
02:02:01.560 --> 02:02:05.960
<v Speaker 9>on the Jeff stein Efry stuff. So we're gonna be

1880
02:02:06.000 --> 02:02:11.000
<v Speaker 9>discussing that tonight, Espionage geopolitics with the expert Russia analyst

1881
02:02:11.119 --> 02:02:14.800
<v Speaker 9>Mark Hackard, geopolitical commentator analysts. You've seen him on art

1882
02:02:14.920 --> 02:02:18.279
<v Speaker 9>and other sites Sold the East and Mark is also

1883
02:02:18.359 --> 02:02:21.439
<v Speaker 9>putting out a new article as well on the controversial

1884
02:02:21.520 --> 02:02:25.319
<v Speaker 9>issue of Uribezmanov. How do we understand and take the

1885
02:02:26.279 --> 02:02:30.319
<v Speaker 9>off sided. Uri Bezumanov talks, Well, we're gonna be looking

1886
02:02:30.399 --> 02:02:34.880
<v Speaker 9>at that, We're gonna be looking at defectors, espionage, geopolitics

1887
02:02:35.239 --> 02:02:38.560
<v Speaker 9>tonight when Mark Hackard joins me to discuss those topics.

1888
02:02:39.239 --> 02:02:42.479
<v Speaker 9>And but you know, we're just crazy conspiracy theorists here.

1889
02:02:42.680 --> 02:02:46.960
<v Speaker 9>We don't actually interview experts, people with graduate degrees in

1890
02:02:47.000 --> 02:02:50.479
<v Speaker 9>these topics. You know, I didn't just write my master's thesis,

1891
02:02:50.920 --> 02:02:54.079
<v Speaker 9>most of it on this topic. No, we're all just

1892
02:02:54.239 --> 02:02:57.199
<v Speaker 9>crazy conspiracy theorists. We don't actually know what we're talking about.

1893
02:02:57.399 --> 02:02:59.840
<v Speaker 9>There's no such thing as conspiracy. There's no espionage, there's

1894
02:02:59.880 --> 02:03:01.119
<v Speaker 9>no I think none of this actually relates to the

1895
02:03:01.199 --> 02:03:04.479
<v Speaker 9>Orthodox world, even though now everybody knows it in relationship

1896
02:03:04.600 --> 02:03:08.079
<v Speaker 9>to the Ukraine. In that situation, it's all fake, it's

1897
02:03:08.159 --> 02:03:13.960
<v Speaker 9>not real, it doesn't exist, and we're just crazy conspiracy theorists, crazies. Well,

1898
02:03:14.079 --> 02:03:17.319
<v Speaker 9>we're gonna get crazy tonight with Mark Hackard, So join

1899
02:03:17.399 --> 02:03:20.880
<v Speaker 9>me tonight. I think about let's see eight or nine

1900
02:03:21.039 --> 02:03:23.680
<v Speaker 9>Central somewhere in there. I'll have the show page up

1901
02:03:23.720 --> 02:03:25.319
<v Speaker 9>here in a little bit. But thank you David, much

1902
02:03:25.359 --> 02:03:28.600
<v Speaker 9>appreciate it. Thank you Jay all right, Everybody, have a

1903
02:03:28.600 --> 02:03:28.920
<v Speaker 9>good night.
