Speaker 1: And joining us now is Joel Skousen, and we had
Speaker 1: a lot to talk about. And again Joel Skousen has
Speaker 1: World Affairs Brief where he gives you an update as
Speaker 1: to what he believes is happening around the world, and
Speaker 1: we're going to talk to him about that, about the wars,
Speaker 1: about the military situations that he has a great deal
Speaker 1: of insight into. And he also has Joel Skousen dot
Speaker 1: com and he's also running for president and so I
Speaker 1: wanted to talk to him now as we're getting pretty
Speaker 1: close to that as to what is going on that.
Speaker 1: So joining us now is Joel Skousen. Good to have
Speaker 1: you back on, Joel. Sorry it's been so long.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you, David, better late than ever. You're always
Speaker 2: good to be with you.
Speaker 1: Well, last time we were talking, you said that you
Speaker 1: thought you were going to get the nomination for the
Speaker 1: Constitution Party and then it looked to me like you
Speaker 1: didn't get it and Randall Terry got it. So tell
Speaker 1: us about your campaign for president and what's going on
Speaker 1: with that.
Speaker 2: Well, actually I didn't ask to run. They asked me
Speaker 2: to run in the Constitution Party. It first asked me
Speaker 2: to be the keynote speaker at the Salt Lake City
Speaker 2: National Convention in April, which I accepted, and then they
Speaker 2: called me back later and said, you know, we need
Speaker 2: somebody credible to run for president. Would you do so?
Speaker 2: And I thought about it, Well, maybe this is an
Speaker 2: opportunity to get a wider audience for my views on
Speaker 2: the history of the deep State and conspiracy and how
Speaker 2: they stole the election from Donald Trump and other things
Speaker 2: like that. And then an interloper came in who had
Speaker 2: run as a Democrat, as a Republican, as an independent
Speaker 2: and decided to try the Constitution Party, not a member
Speaker 2: of the party. Name is Randall Terry. He's a professional
Speaker 2: anti abortion activist. That's how he makes his living. Now
Speaker 2: he's been banned by the National Right to Life Committee
Speaker 2: because of his extreme ads that he puts up on
Speaker 2: television which really turned a lot of people out, a
Speaker 2: lot of body parts and blood and gore and saying
Speaker 2: you got blood on your hands if you have anything
Speaker 2: to do with abortion. And while I am just as
Speaker 2: strong against abortion as Randall Terry, nevertheless I believe in
Speaker 2: taking a more pro life message and appealing to people's
Speaker 2: better nature. But in any case, Randall Terry went to
Speaker 2: the various evangelical parts of the party in the South,
Speaker 2: in the East, and behind my back tried to precede
Speaker 2: me or tell them that I was anti God. Because
Speaker 2: when I did an abbreviated form of the platform, trying
Speaker 2: to cut it down from forty pages to seven pages
Speaker 2: so that it would be workable for the media, I
Speaker 2: didn't put in the major section about God and other
Speaker 2: things in Jesus Christ and being a Christian nation because
Speaker 2: I was cutting things down, not because I didn't believe
Speaker 2: those things. But he was able to successfully paint me
Speaker 2: as anti God, and unfortunately, the party allowed people to
Speaker 2: do proxy voting, that is that they didn't have to
Speaker 2: show up at the convention to vote, So he pulled
Speaker 2: in all these proxy votes and was able to win
Speaker 2: over met and in response, about a third of the
Speaker 2: party decided they would not because of his unprincipled behavior,
Speaker 2: that they would not put him on the ballot. They
Speaker 2: put me on instead, So the party is split. Like
Speaker 2: the Libertarian Party, I am on the Constitution Party ballot
Speaker 2: in Utah, Idaho, and Nevada, and as a write in
Speaker 2: a candidate in Arizona and Wyoming.
Speaker 1: All so yeah, I looked at it. Hey in Tennessee,
Speaker 1: I didn't see anything except a Green Party and a
Speaker 1: couple of communists, I mean they literal communists, and then
Speaker 1: the usual Trump and law law, you know. So I thought, well,
Speaker 1: I got to find out about writing people in, see
Speaker 1: if anybody counts right end candidates.
Speaker 2: But well, the right thing is rather mixed around the nations.
Speaker 2: Sometimes you have to have in certain states, you have
Speaker 2: to have a certain number of electors to back you
Speaker 2: as a write in candidate to get on the ballot.
Speaker 2: So I am on a ballot in Arizona and Wyoming.
Speaker 2: But they neither of those parties decided to put Randall
Speaker 2: Terry on, and they didn't have enough time to put
Speaker 2: me on, so they put me on as a write in.
Speaker 2: But in any case, it's a difficult process, and even
Speaker 2: RFK found out it takes millions of dollars to get
Speaker 2: all the hundreds of thousands of signatures to get on
Speaker 2: the ballots. And the Democrats and Republicans and legislatures do
Speaker 2: this on purpose to make sure that you know, they've
Speaker 2: got a wrap on what people can vote for. And
Speaker 2: so it's been a difficult process, but I'm in it
Speaker 2: for future leadership. Basically, I have been giving speeches mostly
Speaker 2: around the Western States two people about the history of
Speaker 2: the deep state, and that will tie into what we'll
Speaker 2: talk about. How they've been building enemies. They've been building
Speaker 2: Russian China from their very inception, Yes, and how they
Speaker 2: are going to use those enemies to get us into
Speaker 2: a third nuclear world war coming before the end of
Speaker 2: this decade.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 2: And when people find out that happens, and that, as
Speaker 2: I'm predicting, they'll steal the election from Donald Trump again,
Speaker 2: They're going to remember I was the only candidate who
Speaker 2: warned them about these things, and the owner candidate with
Speaker 2: the sufficient knowledge about the deep state to be able
Speaker 2: to drain the swamp. Because you simply cannot tell whether
Speaker 2: not the NSA is lying to you or the FBI
Speaker 2: or the CIA unless you know the history of the
Speaker 2: deep state and how they fomented wars on terror, they
Speaker 2: created isis, they created al Qaeda, They did nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: They killed JFK, they killed the Martin Luther King, they
Speaker 2: did Oklahoma City bombing. They covered up for the tw
Speaker 2: eight one hundred shoot down by a Navy missile that
Speaker 2: went awry. I mean, I know all this stuff and
Speaker 2: you've got to know this stuff in order to be
Speaker 2: able to be able to confront these briefers. And you know,
Speaker 2: you say, you know you're going to tell me this stuff,
Speaker 2: You're going to get fired. You know, I want the truth.
Speaker 2: I don't want this propaganda. I'm too smart for that.
Speaker 2: So let's get on to what's real.
Speaker 1: Well, I absolutely agree with all of what you said.
Speaker 1: It is absolutely the case case. And you know, when
Speaker 1: we look at running as a third party as an independent,
Speaker 1: I was involved with the Libertarian Party trying back in
Speaker 1: the early to mid nineties, late eighties to early to
Speaker 1: mid nineties, and you know, the whole purpose of it
Speaker 1: was to get out there and to get the message out,
Speaker 1: you know, to run for president. And that's an important thing.
Speaker 1: And I tell people as they talk about rigging the election,
Speaker 1: I said, you know, the election is rigged from ballot
Speaker 1: access on.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Then the next thing they rig is access to the debates.
Speaker 1: And of course we saw that with the independent candidacy
Speaker 1: of RFK Junior, right, So it is heavily rigged in
Speaker 1: those areas. And they don't want you talking about these things.
Speaker 1: So again, tell us what your message then is to
Speaker 1: the American people. Besides the conspiracy stuff and everything, what
Speaker 1: is it that you The key thing I know that
Speaker 1: you want people to understand is how the government has
Speaker 1: orchestrated this. And so I'll give you a couple of
Speaker 1: minutes here to talk about this, and I'd like to
Speaker 1: talk about the wars, which is again another part of this.
Speaker 1: As you said, they want to engineer us into a
Speaker 1: world war by the end of the decade. I believe
Speaker 1: that that is part of the natural cycle, historical cycle
Speaker 1: that they understand, and they want to tap into that,
Speaker 1: and they want to have everything basically wiped out so
Speaker 1: they can put in their new world order by twenty thirty.
Speaker 1: That seems to be the date that they want to
Speaker 1: install this technocratic dystopia.
Speaker 2: What is your message then, well, I have a great
Speaker 2: deal of the normal conservative message, a little stronger than most,
Speaker 2: especially stronger than I want to end the FED. For example,
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve needs to be eliminated, and I want
Speaker 2: to eliminate Congress's ability to inflate the money supply as well,
Speaker 2: because they would. You know, inflation is very popular with
Speaker 2: politicians because taxation is very unpopular, and cutting benefits is
Speaker 2: even less popular. And so they love inflation because that's
Speaker 2: the hidden tax. Only the people who are in business
Speaker 2: for themselves, who can raise their prices indiscriminately get away
Speaker 2: with escape the inflation. Everyone else, you know, pays, and
Speaker 2: we are saving suffer, and then we get taxed in
Speaker 2: property tax for inflated values on our houses that really
Speaker 2: aren't inflated at all. We're just paying the inflation tax twice.
Speaker 2: So you know, that's one of the things that I
Speaker 2: would do. I would also, of course, like RFK Junior,
Speaker 2: I would eliminate the ability of big Pharma to pay
Speaker 2: for people in the CDC and the ANAIA like Fauci
Speaker 2: millions of dollars get them from double dipping and getting
Speaker 2: patents on vaccines. I would shut down all of the
Speaker 2: vaccine bioweapons labs. Is over one hundred and fifty around
Speaker 2: the nation that are creating bioweapons. Supposed they have the
Speaker 2: justification that we need a vaccine for this, so we've
Speaker 2: got to create the weapon. Well, why you don't even
Speaker 2: need the vaccine if you don't create the weapon, it's
Speaker 2: just an excuse to engage in illegal acts of bioweapon development,
Speaker 2: which our law prohibits. But it doesn't prohibit vaccine, you know,
Speaker 2: gain a function I would go back to in person
Speaker 2: voting I would make because you know, mail and ballants
Speaker 2: are just subject to too much fraud. And in addition,
Speaker 2: you know, it's like the caucas system in Uton, Idaho
Speaker 2: that the establishment wanted to get rid of because activists,
Speaker 2: the people who really care and are really knowledgeable about parties,
Speaker 2: go to the Caucasus and they're the best ones to
Speaker 2: determine who should represent the party. But when you go
Speaker 2: to the masses, you know, the people who aren't really interested,
Speaker 2: they just listen to the mass media. And so that's
Speaker 2: why in Utah we continue to have mainstream Rhino Republicans
Speaker 2: elected as governor, and Idaho and in Oklahoma. When you
Speaker 2: get rid of the caucas system, you put it in
Speaker 2: a primary, everybody listens to the mass media. So we
Speaker 2: need to get back to in person voting voter id
Speaker 2: We need to shut down the border and allow for
Speaker 2: you know, limited immigration, and where people who sponsor people
Speaker 2: again as they used to, and take responsibility those people
Speaker 2: so it's not a burden on the taxpayer.
Speaker 1: Let me let me ask you this, you know, because
Speaker 1: a lot of times I see this as the concerns
Speaker 1: about the border, and I think they're legitimate concerns. The
Speaker 1: wide open border that we're seeing now, the gangs and
Speaker 1: perhaps hostile international actors that are there, that is a
Speaker 1: key thing. But I think the biggest aspect of this,
Speaker 1: I look at it as a massive welfare magnet. They
Speaker 1: have done everything they can to offer superior benefits to
Speaker 1: people who come here from foreign countries, superior benefits even
Speaker 1: to Americans. And so I always have looked at this
Speaker 1: beckon the Libertarian Party. They would have questions, you know,
Speaker 1: to put you on a two dimensional map that the
Speaker 1: Nolan chart that they put up, and one of them
Speaker 1: was open immigration. And I always said, now you have
Speaker 1: to shut down the welfare state first. And this goes
Speaker 1: back to the Cloward and Pivot stuff. You know, My
Speaker 1: concern about the borders is that if we strictly go
Speaker 1: with a law enforcement approach, You've already got Republicans who
Speaker 1: are mandating e verify. You've got a lot of talk
Speaker 1: about how they want to set up a surveillance scanning,
Speaker 1: you know, high tech, a type of intervention there at
Speaker 1: the border that concerns me as a citizen. I might
Speaker 1: want to get out of this country at some point,
Speaker 1: as Ron Paul said, they can walk and keep you in.
Speaker 1: I mean, where do you stand on that? What's your
Speaker 1: take on that?
Speaker 2: Well, first of all, you have to get rid of
Speaker 2: the incentives, as you say, to get into the country,
Speaker 2: which are mostly welfare. But there's also that incentive to
Speaker 2: you know, take part in the great American dream, you know,
Speaker 2: of starting your own business. And you know a lot
Speaker 2: of Latinos actually integrate quite well, that's right into our society.
Speaker 2: But there's no way that bureaucrats can determine through any
Speaker 2: amount of rules and that properly who's going to come in.
Speaker 2: You can lie enough to fool and get past a bureaucrat.
Speaker 2: So the system that I propose is that you do
Speaker 2: have to have a wall to keep people from skirting
Speaker 2: and coming in illegally, but you make it easier to
Speaker 2: come in, but only through a sponsor. And that means
Speaker 2: a person who's willing to put his citizenship on the
Speaker 2: line and sponsor someone for five years or until they
Speaker 2: become citizens and take total responsibility housing, welfare, their job, everything,
Speaker 2: so that you risk losing your citizenship if if the
Speaker 2: person you sponsor coming in goes out and has a
Speaker 2: crime that you don't pay for, you don't you don't
Speaker 2: make good and that's a tremendous incentive. Yes, employers who
Speaker 2: need they're going to have to sponsor and they're going
Speaker 2: to have to be and so they're going to make
Speaker 2: the best choices possible because they don't want to be
Speaker 2: liable for the misconduct of people coming in, and so
Speaker 2: good people would come in, but in limited numbers because
Speaker 2: of the difficulty of sponsoring and taking that liability. We'd
Speaker 2: make sure that you have the best only that come in.
Speaker 1: I agree. Yeah, we have a lot of countries that
Speaker 1: will allow guest worker programs. But then citizenship is something different.
Speaker 1: You know, you look at Switzerland for example, you have
Speaker 1: to have lived there for quite some time, you have
Speaker 1: to have a lot of references people saying this is
Speaker 1: a person of good character and things like that, and
Speaker 1: then of course there's a citizenship test whether you know
Speaker 1: the country and its laws and support that type of stuff.
Speaker 1: So you know, there's ways that it can be done. Instead,
Speaker 1: you know, what we have is something that really kind
Speaker 1: of serves a system in order to create chaos, and
Speaker 1: that is exactly what we have at the border and
Speaker 1: that doesn't work out well for anybody. It doesn't work
Speaker 1: out for people who want to come to America and
Speaker 1: be citizens, it doesn't work out well for people who
Speaker 1: are in America. There has to be some kind of
Speaker 1: an orderly process there. But again i'm you know, when
Speaker 1: you look at the welfare state, I think as long
Speaker 1: as they are pulling people with that gigantic magnet, they're
Speaker 1: going to come over wall, through the wall, under the wall,
Speaker 1: around the wall, They're they're gonna get in there one
Speaker 1: way or the other. If we've got the big welfare
Speaker 1: state that's there, I'm all for. As you point out,
Speaker 1: I got a lot of hard working immigrants into this
Speaker 1: country that have done a great job, and a lot
Speaker 1: of them very conservative in their politics and conservative family
Speaker 1: oriented people. And so again I'm not anti immigrant, I'm
Speaker 1: just anti chaos, which is really kind at the border.
Speaker 2: Now. Well, one of the things, there's two things that
Speaker 2: we need to do to really reform our country, and
Speaker 2: that is we have to, first of all, and these
Speaker 2: are very unpopular even with conservatives, you have to take
Speaker 2: away the tax monopoly the public schools have on your money. Yes, yes,
Speaker 2: because all education has values and the majority on school
Speaker 2: boards or any other form should never be allowed to
Speaker 2: determine values for everyone. Values must be competing, so that
Speaker 2: you go to the school that teaches the value on
Speaker 2: the own aready to do that is to be free
Speaker 2: to take your money and put it into a school. Now,
Speaker 2: if there is any form of tax payer minimum education,
Speaker 2: how to be maybe through grades one through five and
Speaker 2: they only teach reading, writing, and arithmetic, period No values,
Speaker 2: no social studies, none of this garbage of transgender and
Speaker 2: homosexual you know.
Speaker 1: And of course that's coming out of the Department of
Speaker 1: Education because they are putting the money out there and directing,
Speaker 1: you know, whenever. That's it seems to me that's a
Speaker 1: common recurring theme that I talk about all the time,
Speaker 1: the fact that Washington just conjures money out of thin
Speaker 1: air with a federal reserve and inflation other things like that,
Speaker 1: and then deficit spending, and then they use that conjured
Speaker 1: money to brib people do whatever policies they want, and
Speaker 1: so they're the ones who are really driving this type
Speaker 1: of thing. I just saw that North Dakota is talking
Speaker 1: about getting rid of the property tax, and that is
Speaker 1: a key thing. If we don't get control of the
Speaker 1: property tax. If we don't get control of this out
Speaker 1: of control education spending, none of us is going to
Speaker 1: have a home.
Speaker 2: But you see, it's all because it's been deemed a
Speaker 2: right to have taxpayer free education. And I'll tell you
Speaker 2: it's killing this country because even if you taught properly,
Speaker 2: no one's teaching, and everyone's omitting the limitations on law
Speaker 2: by the constitution, you know, by ignorance. People are growing
Speaker 2: up to be socialists. Yes, and their propaganda. They get
Speaker 2: it all in public schools, they get it all in
Speaker 2: public universities. It's a massive spending thing, yes, And I'm
Speaker 2: against that. I think that there ought to be freedom
Speaker 2: to spend. I mean, and conservatives that protest because they
Speaker 2: love their lavish public schools and they think, oh, well,
Speaker 2: you know in Texas or a new tell you know,
Speaker 2: we control it. You don't control anything. I've been on
Speaker 2: the school board before. When you want to reform things,
Speaker 2: the lawyer sits there and tells you to know, you
Speaker 2: can't do this because of this case. President, this case President. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I just cannot change.
Speaker 1: I just talked this when it came on. They had
Speaker 1: a trends gender coach after the guy became a coach,
Speaker 1: he decided that he wanted to be a woman as well,
Speaker 1: and undressing in front of the girls in the in
Speaker 1: the locker room and all this kind of stuff, and
Speaker 1: the school board wouldn't fire him. You know, lawyers are
Speaker 1: telling me, hey, you can't fire this guy, you know,
Speaker 1: and all this guy. So it's that type of that
Speaker 1: we've absolutely lost control of all of this. But the
Speaker 1: as you point out, these tax funded schools are going
Speaker 1: to be the ruin of us all. That's going to
Speaker 1: be the way they make sure that we own nothing,
Speaker 1: because that's the major asset of most Americans is their home,
Speaker 1: and we're going to lose those homes with a kind
Speaker 1: of lavish spending that they're doing. I mean, just look
Speaker 1: at the electric school buses. That was a big deal
Speaker 1: with Laala, you know, million dollars a bus, and the
Speaker 1: bus company went bust. They went belly up with this stuff.
Speaker 1: But there's no end to the kind of extravagant programs
Speaker 1: that they will do. But there's no end to the
Speaker 1: kind of mischief that they will do to undermine our society.
Speaker 1: And that's really where this is coming from. And it
Speaker 1: all really initially came from the conservatives. Who thought, well,
Speaker 1: we can use this to instill our values into kids.
Speaker 1: What happened was the institution got taken over by the
Speaker 1: other side, and they're instilling their values into the kids.
Speaker 2: And that's why I say, you don't want to let
Speaker 2: anybody with majority rule, conservative or liberal control values. It's competing.
Speaker 2: Conservatives have their own schools, Liberals have their own schools,
Speaker 2: and everybody pays for what they get. You see, it's
Speaker 2: unjust to have people like myself who have never used
Speaker 2: public schools, who homeschool, to have to pay for these
Speaker 2: lavish public schools. And you know, people say, well, it's
Speaker 2: a benefit to all of society to have an educated utter,
Speaker 2: and I say, no, it is not, because we are
Speaker 2: not educating a society. We are educating a peer oriented
Speaker 2: people who all of the bad social problems are infected
Speaker 2: in children in public schools. Yes, and so I could
Speaker 2: make the case that all the damage to society is
Speaker 2: coming out of public school. That isn't the mean that
Speaker 2: all kids get corrupted, but there's enough of that corruption
Speaker 2: going on that we can show that it all emanates
Speaker 2: from the social peer pressure things that happen in public schools. Now,
Speaker 2: the second thing that I would do that we must
Speaker 2: do to solve the problem in this country in terms
Speaker 2: of an ignorant electorate, is that we must have citizenship
Speaker 2: by qualification, not by birth. And I'm not just talking
Speaker 2: about illegals dropping a baby in the United States. I'm
Speaker 2: saying that you have your children, if you're a citizen,
Speaker 2: they are citizens under your capacity until eighteen, and then
Speaker 2: they have to qualify for their own citizenship by taking
Speaker 2: a test. And all the answers are available, but you've
Speaker 2: got to memorize and you've got to learn them. So
Speaker 2: you know, what are the limitations of government? What are
Speaker 2: the true fundamental rights of men? And so you take
Speaker 2: a test and then you sign on the dotted line
Speaker 2: that you will not violate any of these fundamental rights
Speaker 2: properly defined, and that is not included right to medical pay,
Speaker 2: does not include right to welfare, does not include right
Speaker 2: to free education. I have in my Law and Government
Speaker 2: section at Joel scouts dot com delineated all the true
Speaker 2: fundamental rights. But here's what that does. It eliminates this
Speaker 2: term limits problem. You know, the problem David with term
Speaker 2: limits is that electing welfare promising socialists are a dime
Speaker 2: a dozen but you try to get another Ron Paul
Speaker 2: to get elected, and you have trouble finding constitutional conservatives
Speaker 2: to run. You see, so you know the term limits.
Speaker 2: Get rid of conservatives much more easy than they get
Speaker 2: rid of socialist unless you have this qualified citizenship, because
Speaker 2: then if they try to introduce legislation that takes away
Speaker 2: someone's fundabout rights by providing welfare, they lose their citizenship.
Speaker 2: They're automatically disqualified from Congress. And so that is the
Speaker 2: barrier that enforces the limitations on the Constitution. Is a
Speaker 2: citizen ship packed a compact that everybody's assumed signs on
Speaker 2: the dotted line and agrees to defend the fundamental rights.
Speaker 2: Novel concept, but it works. It's a powerful concept, and
Speaker 2: it gets rid of all the ignorant voters because you
Speaker 2: have to know what the limitations of government.
Speaker 1: And well, I think for starters, we could get rid
Speaker 1: of all the people in Congress who had sworn too
Speaker 1: the constitutionally, all new people in Congress right there in
Speaker 1: one fell swoop.
Speaker 2: It's about eighty percent of them, right.
Speaker 1: And maybe if you if you pass the test and
Speaker 1: you sign it, maybe you get forty seven dollars from
Speaker 1: Elon Musk maybe we get him to kick that in.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I thought it was funny, you know, and people were saying, well,
Speaker 1: you know, he's paying people to vote for Trump, and
Speaker 1: it's like, well, no, actually, he's paying people to say
Speaker 1: that they support the First and Second Amendment. Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: support the First and second Amendment. He doesn't support it
Speaker 1: at all. Yeah, his bump stocks and his demands to
Speaker 1: take the licenses away from anybody that reports in a
Speaker 1: way that he doesn't like the news reported. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know. But again, let's talk a little bit
Speaker 1: about foreign policy, because that is something that you are
Speaker 1: focused on. Tell us what you would do. And then
Speaker 1: I want to talk a little bit about as we
Speaker 1: see this continually provoking World war iie, we see this
Speaker 1: escalating constantly in Israel, we see it in Ukraine, we
Speaker 1: see it happening with China. I mean they are everywhere
Speaker 1: where they are, they are incrementally provoking this with brinksmanship
Speaker 1: and all the rest of this stuff or preemptive attacks.
Speaker 1: Talk to us a little bit about foreign policy.
Speaker 2: Well, in the first place, I'm the only one conservative
Speaker 2: out there who is warning that Russia and China are
Speaker 2: existential enemies. Now while it is true that the Western
Speaker 2: globalists have built these two enemies from the beginning. I
Speaker 2: want to be clear about that. You read Anthony Sutton's
Speaker 2: book on Wall Street and the Rise of Bolshevism. You
Speaker 2: read his book on Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler.
Speaker 2: They built these enemies. He could have written a book
Speaker 2: on how we built Mount Setoun, you know, by cutting
Speaker 2: off aid to chang Kaishek or running cast or limit
Speaker 2: we've brought now we brought Castro to power by cutting
Speaker 2: off military aid. De Battista. We brought the Sound and
Speaker 2: Easts to power by cutting off military aid too. But
Speaker 2: these globalists you're a lot is need, are not communists,
Speaker 2: and they may be helping communists, they may be using
Speaker 2: communists to break down the social order, but they are
Speaker 2: not communists. They believe in a milder, slicker, more deceptive
Speaker 2: form of socialism where you own things. But well, in
Speaker 2: case of the you know, World Economic Forum, you own nothing.
Speaker 2: But that's that's really not the global point of view.
Speaker 2: That's never going to happen. By We're never going to
Speaker 2: see an ai Audi society because these ideological leftists and
Speaker 2: transhumanists don't understand and the globalist top leaders are not
Speaker 2: telling them that we're going to be having a Third
Speaker 2: World war coming, and it's going to, unfortunately, I think,
Speaker 2: get out of control. Even the globalists who create this
Speaker 2: war aren't going to be able to control it because
Speaker 2: it's going to start with an EMP strike that's going
Speaker 2: to take down the grid for over a year. And
Speaker 2: you can imagine the hatred and discontent and rioting and
Speaker 2: social unrest and the deaths that will be caused by
Speaker 2: no electricity in this country.
Speaker 1: That's right, That's one of the reasons I've talked about
Speaker 1: what's going on in North Carolina. So this is the
Speaker 1: harbinger of what's to come. You know, when you look
Speaker 1: at what happens there and you look at the fact
Speaker 1: that if the federal government gets involved at all, it's
Speaker 1: there to oppose you, and it's neighbor helping neighbor, and
Speaker 1: that is, you know, what we need to start thinking
Speaker 1: about because that could come upon us all and just
Speaker 1: as rapidly as that storm in a war format.
Speaker 2: But neighbor won't be able to help neighbors when they
Speaker 2: run out of food too. That's why I say everybody
Speaker 2: has an obligation to prepare for these coming cataclysmic events,
Speaker 2: and the government is preparing. They've got new underground bunker
Speaker 2: systems to get huge stockpiles for the continuity of governor
Speaker 2: government system to protect the bureaucrats. But they're not worn
Speaker 2: in the American people. But it's very important for your
Speaker 2: audience to understand, and I'm the only journalist that's ever
Speaker 2: warned about this, that Russia faked their own demise in
Speaker 2: nineteen eighty ninety ninety one. They're still communists. Putin is
Speaker 2: still communist, the Communist Party still runs things in Moscow.
Speaker 2: He is not anti woke, he is not Christian. All
Speaker 2: of this is a grand deception, and so was the
Speaker 2: deception that he was justified in invading Ukraine because of
Speaker 2: the threat of Ukraine going into NATO. He doesn't mind
Speaker 2: if countries go into NATO. Remember I he faked his
Speaker 2: own demise. They didn't purge any of the Communists out
Speaker 2: of Czechoslovakia, pol And, Romania. In fact, Lequeleenza of Solidarity
Speaker 2: was a Communist agent, so it was Baklab Hobbel, the
Speaker 2: so called Western leader of Czechoslovakia. This was a grand deception,
Speaker 2: and so Putin has all these countries part of NATO.
Speaker 2: You don't think he's got dozens of spies in the
Speaker 2: NATO in these other western countries that used to be
Speaker 2: Soviet satellites. Of course they do. And the corruption is
Speaker 2: there just as much as it is in Ukraine. That's
Speaker 2: why there is corruption in Ukraine because of all the
Speaker 2: whole over communists in the bureaucracy like Burisma, who made
Speaker 2: deals with it, and they're still there. But the point
Speaker 2: is the Ukrainian people don't deserve to be taken back
Speaker 2: into the Soviet system, which is what Putin was going
Speaker 2: to do. And he even told Tucker Carlson that Stalin
Speaker 2: and Leon Lenin put these Russians into Ukrasis. I don't
Speaker 2: know why. Of course he knows why, because the Russians
Speaker 2: were going to fake their own device. He told Tucker
Speaker 2: carl From that, he said the Russian leadership initiated the
Speaker 2: fall of the Soviet unit. And it didn't mean a
Speaker 2: thing to Tucker because he didn't remember that. The official
Speaker 2: narrative was that this was a spontaneous uprising in Eastern
Speaker 2: Europe that the Soviets couldn't control, But that wasn't true
Speaker 2: at all. Eric Connecker, on his death bed said, Moscow
Speaker 2: gave me orders to let the student protest and Leipzac
Speaker 2: go forward and to stand down the Stazi. They gave
Speaker 2: orders for the KGB and Red Square to stand down
Speaker 2: and not arrest the protesters. And you know, I could
Speaker 2: go on and on about the history and the details
Speaker 2: I have about the phony fall of the Soviet Union,
Speaker 2: and so unfortunately because of the phony war on terror
Speaker 2: which we created by the deep state grating nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: and we went after that as the globalists and neocons
Speaker 2: went after innocent countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria.
Speaker 2: We weren't involved in nine to eleven at all and
Speaker 2: are still there against them. People let good people like
Speaker 2: Ron Paul think there are no enemies except our own
Speaker 2: deep state and that there won't be World War three
Speaker 2: because we're unless we provoke it. And that isn't true.
Speaker 2: While it is true, they're provoking because they want this
Speaker 2: war to drive us into a militarized global government, but
Speaker 2: they don't really have to. Russian and China have a
Speaker 2: long plan. They've always been allies from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: when Russia started to aid Mount Siktun and built up China,
Speaker 2: when Russia aided Jyongsun the North Korea to attack South Korea,
Speaker 2: and the Chinese got involved in that. Look, they've always
Speaker 2: been in alliance to take down the West. They're still doing it.
Speaker 2: It's going to happen because all three predator centers want
Speaker 2: this war. So let's stop getting And the big thing
Speaker 2: that conservatives don't understand is that even though these globalists
Speaker 2: and neocons build these enemies, remember all through the Cold War,
Speaker 2: how they were downplaying the Russian threat. We just need
Speaker 2: to tain them as long as we don't have nuclear war.
Speaker 2: We've won the Cold War. And so everyone thought Reagan
Speaker 2: beat it, but he didn't win. It was a deception.
Speaker 2: The Russians faked their own demise and the cool conservatives
Speaker 2: by giving Reagan the credit on this. But Reagan was
Speaker 2: as deceived as anyone else in the thinking that he
Speaker 2: did it. And of course why did they do it?
Speaker 2: Tucker Putin said to Tucker, he said, we did it
Speaker 2: because we wanted peace and cooperation with the West. But
Speaker 2: that was a lie.
Speaker 1: You must have had a I would have liked to
Speaker 1: watch you watch the Tucker Cross interview with Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 1: You must have it bothered me, and and you know,
Speaker 1: and then seeing him, you know, go in and do
Speaker 1: these loving close ups of the mosaic of Vladimir Lenen
Speaker 1: and the subway station, all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 1: The Russians are very good at playing chess, aren't they.
Speaker 2: Uh, And they even did it, you know, the Kupdi
Speaker 2: graph for conservative says, but what about the Ukraine Revolution?
Speaker 2: Victoria Neulan gave five billion dollars. No, it wasn't five million.
Speaker 2: That was for the whole budget democracy now for all
Speaker 2: of Eastern Europe. But let's suppose she gave a million
Speaker 2: to the Ukrainian protests. Yes, the globalists did fund the protest,
Speaker 2: but it wasn't a Western coup. It's true that he was.
Speaker 2: They falsify the elections in Ukraine. Like everything. Every Ukrainian
Speaker 2: prime minister has been a phony nationalist. They've all been
Speaker 2: pro putin Yulia Timoshenko. But Viktor Yanikovich, the Communist president
Speaker 2: of twenty fourteen, was elected. If you discount the fraud
Speaker 2: that's always involved in these nations. The point is he
Speaker 2: was the one who allowed the protesters to win. It
Speaker 2: was the communist president that told the bear kut the
Speaker 2: riot police that kept the protesters completely boxed in and
Speaker 2: made on square and even shot and killed and tortured
Speaker 2: some of them. It was he who told them to
Speaker 2: stand down, just like gor the communist leaders told Lestazi
Speaker 2: and the KGB to stand down, that bear Koup were
Speaker 2: told to stand down. And that's why the protesters of
Speaker 2: February twenty fourteen woke up on Friday morning and there
Speaker 2: was nobody there to keep them in the square. Now
Speaker 2: that's like the Trump protesters going up to the capitol
Speaker 2: and having no capital police there who could have given
Speaker 2: the standdown order? Only Nancy Pelosi. See, conservatives don't know
Speaker 2: these crucial factors, these crucial factors. And why did Janikovich
Speaker 2: do this so that he could have the appearance of
Speaker 2: a Western couhu. And what did they do? They had
Speaker 2: a temporary president, yes Chenuk, for two months and then
Speaker 2: they held election. That what lo and behold happened. Pietro
Speaker 2: Portoschenku appeared as a Ukrainian nationalist. To the Russian speakers
Speaker 2: in the Dobas said, you can speak in Russian, you
Speaker 2: don't have to speak Ukrainian. You can be self determining. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, a semi autonomous state, and then as soon
Speaker 2: as he got elected he changed and he said, no,
Speaker 2: you've got to speak Ukrainian, you can't be self autonomous.
Speaker 2: He provoked them. Now what am I saying this? This
Speaker 2: is the reason? Yes, you know, Nikovich's the communists pulled
Speaker 2: his own demise, just like the Russians did that in
Speaker 2: the faking their own solution. He is a communist and
Speaker 2: pro Putin could not have provoked the Russians in Dombas
Speaker 2: and Crimea. But you have a fake nationalist getting elected,
Speaker 2: Pietro Portoshenko, who's best friends with all the Russian oligarchs,
Speaker 2: so you know where his loyalties a lie. He did
Speaker 2: provoke them, and what did that do? Immediately Putin started
Speaker 2: his stealth invasion of Crimeabos. That's when it started, and
Speaker 2: that's how it started. Is not a Western coup. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm the only one that asks the truth on this, David,
Speaker 2: And I'll tell you conservatives are so hardened, are so
Speaker 2: hardened about wars of intervention, which were true after the phony.
Speaker 2: They were all phony wars of an invention, But it's
Speaker 2: not true. What they need to understand is that the
Speaker 2: globalists have to switch side and start attacking the correct
Speaker 2: enemy before World War IIIE, just like they did, and
Speaker 2: they started to attack Hitler after building up his army
Speaker 2: and after funding all of this, then they had to
Speaker 2: start to attack him. So they're on the right side
Speaker 2: when the war starts, and that's why they started to
Speaker 2: attack Putin. And so conservatives think, oh, if they're attacking Putin,
Speaker 2: he must be innocent. And that's the most stupid conclusion
Speaker 2: I've ever heard.
Speaker 1: Well saying going back to twenty nineteen, after Zelunski got
Speaker 1: in and he had Alexey Arrestovich, who was going to
Speaker 1: be the peace you know, they ran on a platform
Speaker 1: in peace right, so he's going to be the peace representative.
Speaker 1: And he came back and on Ukrainian TV they said,
Speaker 1: so what's the possibility of peace and he says none.
Speaker 1: She goes, oh, that's horrible. He goes, oh, it's going
Speaker 1: to get a lot worse. He said in three years
Speaker 1: switchingm in twenty twenty two, he said, we're going to
Speaker 1: have full war with Russia. So you knew that, and
Speaker 1: he said the country is going to be destroyed, but
Speaker 1: we get into NATO or whatever you know. I mean,
Speaker 1: but he knew exactly the timeframe, which the invasion was
Speaker 1: going to happen. I've always thought that was an amazing
Speaker 1: clip that is completely ignored by the Western media. To
Speaker 1: show that that's what is happening there on face value
Speaker 1: is not really what is happening. So talk a little
Speaker 1: bit about as you say you think that it's going
Speaker 1: to be sometime in the next five years, are going
Speaker 1: to kick off World War three? How do you see this?
Speaker 1: How you see this coming back?
Speaker 2: Is it.
Speaker 1: What is happening in Ukraine first or China first? How
Speaker 1: do you see this as rolling out?
Speaker 2: Well, it can't start in Ukraine or the Middle East
Speaker 2: because you see Putin, even though he's allied with Iran,
Speaker 2: he can't start a nuclear war with the West, even
Speaker 2: though he's threatened almost a dozen times now, because he
Speaker 2: can't occupy. Now there's a military officer I can tell you,
Speaker 2: if you can't occupy after throwing nuclear weapons, they simply
Speaker 2: rebuild and come back and get you. Because nuclear weapons
Speaker 2: do not destroy the world. It's not a nuclear winner
Speaker 2: after that. Nuclear weapons now that are air burst have
Speaker 2: fairly small amounts of radiation. Now you still need to
Speaker 2: get protected from it, but nevertheless, it's not the all
Speaker 2: dying scenario that the anti nuclear lobby has said. You see,
Speaker 2: Putin has to wait for China until they're ready, because
Speaker 2: China does have the troops and the equipment and the
Speaker 2: physical conventional army that has not been degraded as Putin's
Speaker 2: has been in Ukraine. And that's why I support the
Speaker 2: war in Ukraine. I don't support military aid, I mean
Speaker 2: financial aid decrene because of the corruption. But I do
Speaker 2: think the globalists know what they're doing intens of a
Speaker 2: weakening Russia's conventional army because it forces him to wait
Speaker 2: until China is ready. And China can't get involved because
Speaker 2: of the Middle East. They don't have direct involvement there
Speaker 2: or in Ukraine. Yet they have to wait for the
Speaker 2: Taiwan situation to be the trigger beent. I think the
Speaker 2: Taiwan is going to be the trigger bent and military
Speaker 2: One congressman just said, we just got a briefing from
Speaker 2: the military. The jijingking says he's going to be ready
Speaker 2: to take Taiwan in twenty twenty seven, and that matches
Speaker 2: my prognostication. But he has to wait till he's ready,
Speaker 2: because now that we're going to defend Taiwan, he knows
Speaker 2: he's going to have to take out in the US
Speaker 2: full force with nuclear strikes on our military basis when
Speaker 2: that strike happens. And Kim Yong um has also said,
Speaker 2: I'm going to enter into the war on behalf of
Speaker 2: China if the US tries to intervene. That means a
Speaker 2: war in South Korea. So if you see those things happening,
Speaker 2: we'll probably be in World War three within three weeks
Speaker 2: to a month after that starts. That's the trigger event
Speaker 2: you need to watch well.
Speaker 1: And how do the forces stack up in your mind?
Speaker 1: I mean it would be in terms of hypersonic missiles
Speaker 1: or things like that. How does it stack up US
Speaker 1: versus China.
Speaker 2: Well, the nuclear forces of Russia overwhelm ours. They've almost
Speaker 2: got ten times more weapons on their missiles to throw
Speaker 2: out the United States than our puny four hundred single
Speaker 2: warhead minute man three missiles. We took off the three
Speaker 2: warheads and put out a single warhead and all of those.
Speaker 2: Because of the PDD sixty, which was signed by Clinton
Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety seven, the military has been to the
Speaker 2: missile force has been instructed to do disorb a nuclear
Speaker 2: first strike and then retaliate after that means we lose
Speaker 2: all of our major military bases, we lose all of
Speaker 2: our missile bases in the first strike. And then we
Speaker 2: have about seven blistic missile submarines because we keep half
Speaker 2: of them. Import at any one time, seven blistic missile
Speaker 2: submarines out there, and their warheads are not big enough
Speaker 2: to hit arden targets. So you see, they're setting us
Speaker 2: up for not a total defeat, but a decapitation of
Speaker 2: our military. And that's how they come out of their
Speaker 2: bunkers and talk the Americans into joining a militarized global
Speaker 2: government because our military has been decapitated and the whole
Speaker 2: West will raise up for the hand says save us.
Speaker 2: You think nine to eleven was bad in terms of
Speaker 2: yesmanship to government, You think what will happen when we
Speaker 2: absorb a nuclear first strike on military targets. So that's
Speaker 2: the trigger event. That's what's going to happen, and I'll
Speaker 2: tell you it's going to be serious. So people need
Speaker 2: to start to prepare.
Speaker 1: And again I'll tell people, you go to Joel scousing
Speaker 1: dot com and they can see their strategic relocation and
Speaker 1: strategic housing and stuff. And of course we were talking
Speaker 1: about you when we saw what was happening with Hurricane
Speaker 1: Milton in Florida. So I said, just as Joel scous
Speaker 1: And said, look at the packed places. People trying to
Speaker 1: get out of there, and it's completely they can't get
Speaker 1: out of the roads because there's just a few north
Speaker 1: and south roads that are there. So again, if you
Speaker 1: want to know where the best places to be are,
Speaker 1: Joel has thought this through. He is really He's got
Speaker 1: an excellent book about that strategic relocation. I've got a
Speaker 1: question here from listeners. Can you pull that up, Karen,
Speaker 1: And this is from Brian and Deb McCartney. He said, David,
Speaker 1: can you please ask Joel if he knew Russell Bentley,
Speaker 1: who fought for the don Bass. He was supposedly killed
Speaker 1: in Ukraine. US citizen, do you know anything about that?
Speaker 2: I don't absolutely. He was a shield for the Russian
Speaker 2: He's a communist, an American communist who went over there
Speaker 2: to fight for them. He's not a patriot. The only
Speaker 2: spewed pro Russian propaganda about Ukraine losing instantly. And the
Speaker 2: same thing with Scott Ritter and Doug McGregor. They're both
Speaker 2: shills for Russia. They have been telling the Conservatives for
Speaker 2: years now that Russia Ukraine has finished, and it's not finished.
Speaker 2: As long as the US and the West continues to
Speaker 2: put good, solid weaponry in there, it won't be defeated
Speaker 2: and it will end up in It's a tragic thing
Speaker 2: because it's a no win a bit of a no
Speaker 2: win war. But as I say, the globalists do have
Speaker 2: a proper purpose in weakening Russia's ability to go nuclear
Speaker 2: because of you know, working down and they've exposed a
Speaker 2: lot of weaknesses in Russian Russian military. It's very sad,
Speaker 2: but you know, it's a complex situation, these conspiracies. You know,
Speaker 2: both the globalists and Russian China play good cop bad cop.
Speaker 2: You've got to be able to Unfortunately, I want to
Speaker 2: say Trump is an ignoramus when it comes to foreign policy.
Speaker 2: He thinks Jijing ping with one phone calling stop World
Speaker 2: War three. He thinks he can stop the war in
Speaker 2: Ukraine with one phone called Vladimir Prudin. And he thinks
Speaker 2: that Kim in North Korea is his best pen pal buddy.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's real naivete David, and he doesn't.
Speaker 1: Know that are if it's just as he tells us
Speaker 1: to the people who support him and they think it.
Speaker 1: I don't know if Trump really believes any of this
Speaker 1: stuff he's spewing out there or not. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I just kind of I don't know if he's.
Speaker 2: Look, Trump is subject to flattery. He dishes it out,
Speaker 2: that's right, and he's subject to flattery. And that's how
Speaker 2: all this happened. Jiji Ping flattered him, got him on
Speaker 2: his side. He told Kim y on him. When he
Speaker 2: comes to just now your nuclear weapons. Just flatter him.
Speaker 2: Then he'll be putting in your hands. And that's exactly
Speaker 2: what happened.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, it's all about the narcissism, absolutely is,
Speaker 1: and I think we can all pretty much see it.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: And one last thing, and Greg Karen, you can go
Speaker 1: ahead and play us out here because we ran over
Speaker 1: a little bit of time. Jason Barker says, Joel's got
Speaker 1: my vote for just eliminating the FED. All problems come
Speaker 1: from that, including war. Absolutely true. Joel is great to
Speaker 1: have you on and again, folks, if you want to
Speaker 1: find out what's going on with this campaign, you can
Speaker 1: go Joel Scousen dot com. Make sure you check out
Speaker 1: World Affairs Brief, but especially go to Joelscousen dot com
Speaker 1: get that information about preparing a secure home and about
Speaker 1: strategic location relocation. Thank you so much, sjol.
Speaker 2: You're welcome. Thank you. Good to be with you.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Let me so you the David Night Show you can
Speaker 3: listen to with your ears. You can even watch it
Speaker 3: by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
Speaker 3: that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
Speaker 4: Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else,
Speaker 4: you can find all the links to everywhere to watch
Speaker 4: or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 2: That's a website.