Speaker 1: The roadcaster itself plays back it's what I'm hearing in mic,
Speaker 1: so it was not showing me what was actually happening
Speaker 1: on the screen yesterday and on the broadcast, So I
Speaker 1: didn't realize that Streamyard decided to change the settings on
Speaker 1: me without my knowledge and utilize the little tiny microphone
Speaker 1: inside the the other camera. So that's what I was
Speaker 1: talking out of. Thank god it was near me on
Speaker 1: the desk, but it wasn't this one right? This one
Speaker 1: sounds way better, you know. So those little microphones I
Speaker 1: don't even like. I don't know why they put them
Speaker 1: on a camera, because your camera will be whatever distance
Speaker 1: it is away from you to get the thing framedn't right,
Speaker 1: and that could vary, and it would be kind of
Speaker 1: silly to have your microphone super far away from you
Speaker 1: because you're trying to center in your and frame out
Speaker 1: your your your video correct correctly. So I never understood
Speaker 1: that why it's even there. I searched for one that
Speaker 1: didn't have but I didn't like some of the specs
Speaker 1: on it and some of the stuff that was talked
Speaker 1: about in the comments for the past purchases. So I
Speaker 1: went with the one I have, and it's fine, It's
Speaker 1: just I had to adjust that because it decided to
Speaker 1: switch on me, and also because I'm using Rumble Live
Speaker 1: the studio today. I have this thing muted so I
Speaker 1: can actually see what's going on. But it's a huge,
Speaker 1: huge delay. I'm trying to see how I'm going to
Speaker 1: do this. I guess I just go through, just go
Speaker 1: through obs and just kind of like pause this out.
Speaker 1: I guess that would be the best way to do it.
Speaker 1: So that's fine, all right, So let's get started. Hopefully
Speaker 1: everything will work properly today and I'll just be on
Speaker 1: a smaller viewing screen I suppose, and we will go
Speaker 1: from there. Let me see if I do window well,
Speaker 1: you know, let's go to scene two. I go to
Speaker 1: media source. That's the wrong one. I go to window
Speaker 1: capture okay, cool, okay cool, and then the other one
Speaker 1: I'll have to use for display capture. We should be good.
Speaker 1: We should be very good. And there's my stupid head.
Speaker 1: So if you're not familiar with Spreaker, that is where
Speaker 1: my podcast versions are distributed from, follow me on there
Speaker 1: if you can. Six hundred and three episodes created almost
Speaker 1: five years ago. Now September will make it five years
Speaker 1: and you can see the long, long list here of
Speaker 1: all the past shows and some of the ones that
Speaker 1: were taken down from Rumble, like the broadcast for Europe
Speaker 1: in the Last Battle. At least you be able to
Speaker 1: hear it, you don't be able to see it. I
Speaker 1: think that one's a you know better if you see
Speaker 1: an hear it, but it is what it is. There's
Speaker 1: some of those post it awesome on Bradyon. Braydyon has
Speaker 1: a decent amount of them. I think it stops at nine.
Speaker 1: I don't think all twelve portions are on there, and
Speaker 1: I'm not hunder percent sure that all of them are
Speaker 1: anywhere anymore because Rumble deleted them twice. So bypassing stream
Speaker 1: Yard altogether today, this is just a little experiment that
Speaker 1: I'm doing, and also just a friendly reminder I do
Speaker 1: have a Patreon. The link is in the description. It's
Speaker 1: patreon dot com. Forward slash C for channel, so it's
Speaker 1: for slash c Ford Slash Disguise D I S g
Speaker 1: U I S E. The Limits. Okay, they took down
Speaker 1: the Ballbuster someone a long long time ago, so that's
Speaker 1: why it has a different name. Capital d on Disguise,
Speaker 1: Capital Len Limits, not one hundred percent sure if that
Speaker 1: matter is. But that's how it appears, so that's why
Speaker 1: I'm showing it to you. All right. No, yesterday I
Speaker 1: had awful, awful, awful audio, So let me test this
Speaker 1: by playing this short video here.
Speaker 2: I beg I rearranged the house while I was gone,
Speaker 2: and it looks great as far as beam.
Speaker 1: If you're hearing an echo through my microphone, please also
Speaker 1: let me know that.
Speaker 2: There's my elliptical. I put that light in because of Oh,
Speaker 2: but it's nice white light so I can read good times.
Speaker 1: Our house is basically a shrine to our daughter.
Speaker 2: Here's the black filtered pool tables. Just got some boxes
Speaker 2: on it because we're packing.
Speaker 1: Away up all these orders that we got while we
Speaker 1: were gone. But I can access it and I can
Speaker 1: pleak pool. Awesome.
Speaker 2: And she did this cool thing with my weight bench.
Speaker 1: That's what my elliptical used to be. And this thing
Speaker 1: that you see here, this thing called toss and fire.
Speaker 1: I found it very odd. I went to Bread and
Speaker 1: Beach and they have this Syracuse business with a wood
Speaker 1: fired pizza food truck. We went. Yeah, it was pretty expensive,
Speaker 1: eleven bucks for like a like a ten inch pizza
Speaker 1: or something like that. But it was tasty. But I
Speaker 1: just saw this imagery here with the pizza on the
Speaker 1: gold chain and the idea of toss and fire sounds awful,
Speaker 1: like you know, sacrificial of a name child sacrifice type
Speaker 1: of thing, and it just it all looked weird, you know.
Speaker 1: So I kept the box because I was going to
Speaker 1: make a comment terry commentary video on that. But that's
Speaker 1: why you see it there. It's not because I'm like
Speaker 1: enshrining it or anything like that. It's just because I
Speaker 1: thought it was very odd. So there's that, I mean,
Speaker 1: just the overall look of the person, the name of
Speaker 1: the company itself, and the fact that they have I mean,
Speaker 1: I guess it's a pizza company, but I mean, we know,
Speaker 1: we know what things mean, and it just seems like
Speaker 1: an oversight on their part if they thought that was
Speaker 1: cool or it's deliberate. Yeah. So now the bed is
Speaker 1: to the right of this, so right now, that's where
Speaker 1: my workoutseite was. It wasn't in the other room in
Speaker 1: the living room, but that's where my elliptical was once
Speaker 1: before I came back home and I saw that was moved,
Speaker 1: and I'm fine with that. It's everything looks great that
Speaker 1: it was once in the other room. All my rubber
Speaker 1: weights are still like the rubber coated weights are in
Speaker 1: the other room. So that's my blank I kind of
Speaker 1: sleep on top of the big blanket because it's so hot,
Speaker 1: and I just threw that little one on.
Speaker 3: Top of me.
Speaker 1: But yeah, this nice big floor here. We could go
Speaker 1: dance and maybe Rebecca and I will dance together again.
Speaker 3: Look at that.
Speaker 1: These are fair as bullying pins that she gets all right,
Speaker 1: we get it. I just was a test for whether
Speaker 1: or not you could hear it. So let me go
Speaker 1: back to the rumble and see if nobody has made
Speaker 1: any complaints there for yeah yet, So it looks like
Speaker 1: it might be good if you are watching, and you
Speaker 1: know I forgot to do because of course, of course
Speaker 1: I would. Let's go to content and I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: I'll explain to you what the title means here in
Speaker 1: just a second. I forgot to do this. There's a
Speaker 1: creep button. Let me just go ahead and put this
Speaker 1: link in here so people know that we're on. We'll
Speaker 1: get started here. Well, things will pick up quickly. I'm
Speaker 1: just yeah, that's good enough. Make that one public somilar
Speaker 1: people can see it. That's quick, all right, good enough,
Speaker 1: all right. So you see the azure well on here
Speaker 1: and the name integer. So let's let's see what that means,
Speaker 1: because you know from math what that means. But so
Speaker 1: now total noun integerors dulla a number that is not
Speaker 1: a fraction, a whole number. Now, Part two is what
Speaker 1: I want to look at, a thing complete in itself.
Speaker 1: And I say to that mankind is a whole. It
Speaker 1: is complete into its in and of itself. Anything outside
Speaker 1: of that is a partial, which means it's lacking something.
Speaker 1: It's envious, potentially, it's jealous, it's hateful, it's rageful. So
Speaker 1: based on that idea itself, the integer or the whole,
Speaker 1: those who are complete and the individual in and of
Speaker 1: themselves are also complete. And it is of the utmost
Speaker 1: importance to maintain your individuality and be doing the best
Speaker 1: you can to make yourself as good of a person
Speaker 1: as you can be. Those who cannot be, or are
Speaker 1: not or don't have all the parts necessary to be
Speaker 1: a whole will always be a nuisance to those who are,
Speaker 1: and they will do everything they can to convince that
Speaker 1: which is strong that it is weak. It'll act as
Speaker 1: a parasite, needing to feed off of that which is whole,
Speaker 1: that which can create, that which is innovative. And that
Speaker 1: is why integer was named. That's why I chose the
Speaker 1: title integer today. And it says in early sixteenth century
Speaker 1: as an adjective meaning entire or whole from Latin intact
Speaker 1: whole the root of tangier to touch compare with you, okay,
Speaker 1: to compare it. But that's why I think the definition
Speaker 1: is important, and that's why I think the name of
Speaker 1: the word is important, because we need to see that
Speaker 1: if we try to fragment ourselves and say one group
Speaker 1: is supreme over the others, then what we're doing is
Speaker 1: we're doing our own deconstruction. Do you understand, we're dissecting ourselves.
Speaker 1: We're parsing out pieces, not understanding. Just like a whole
Speaker 1: food is more nutritious than an extract or an isolated element,
Speaker 1: it's the whole and that frequency. And now that there's
Speaker 1: where it gets really interesting, because if it's not a
Speaker 1: whole with all things working together, that frequency signature is different.
Speaker 1: And if mankind is the whole that frequency signature, then
Speaker 1: anything that's different from that could potentially be viewed as
Speaker 1: not of mankind. And I think you understand where I'm
Speaker 1: driving here. I think you get what I'm trying to say.
Speaker 1: I started off going deep, all right. Now I've got
Speaker 1: a couple of things here. I don't need that one anymore,
Speaker 1: so they should just play. Should just be fine. But again,
Speaker 1: let me know in the chats if you don't hear something.
Speaker 1: All right, But as far as I know, this is
Speaker 1: how this works. That's gotta figure out which one I
Speaker 1: wanted to do.
Speaker 4: But I.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's not the one. Is this up here twice?
Speaker 5: It is?
Speaker 1: Well, that's kind of stupid. Let me go back to
Speaker 1: this guy real quick. So Jamie DeLux, he's got this
Speaker 1: one called behind bars, as in you know who had
Speaker 1: two rs. So let's go ahead. This one really is
Speaker 1: interesting like father, like son, lackey dammit, and Anthony Ketis
Speaker 1: that one's very very disturbing. Examining Aaron Carter that one
Speaker 1: was also interesting. Now I had one for and I
Speaker 1: just had it up here. I'm not sure why I
Speaker 1: must have gotten deleted off of We went over the
Speaker 1: finders one vax holes here with a good old Howard
Speaker 1: stirred on that list. I had okay, the Koura Guru,
Speaker 1: that one was reposted, that one was much older than
Speaker 1: a year ago. Let's go with this. I think I
Speaker 1: had it from my history reverse jumpscrip taste activities went on.
Speaker 1: Here's the one to pop on your getting. That's what
Speaker 1: I want to start with. Yep, that was it, So
Speaker 1: let's get a little bit. I don't I can't play
Speaker 1: the music because it was a little knock me out.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about gydascheck and the people who behind and
Speaker 1: why this isn't so important. That why I'm bringing this
Speaker 1: up again, it is because I was knocked off of TikTok.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure for how long or if it's still
Speaker 1: if it's invisible. I haven't seen any act as of late.
Speaker 1: All the numbers still look the same as if it's
Speaker 1: frozen in time. And haven't tried to post again since
Speaker 1: my second one was knocked off. But as I showed
Speaker 1: you before, and I think this is where I have
Speaker 1: to change the thing over to a display capture right here,
Speaker 1: so it says video removed. This video guy violates our
Speaker 1: community guidelines. You received a strike on your account for
Speaker 1: violating our community guidelines. All I said was doctor G
Speaker 1: states undeniable facts that there has never been scientific proof
Speaker 1: using the Cook's postulate or River's modifications for any of
Speaker 1: the alleged v words they claim cause illness. Science hasn't
Speaker 1: been scientific since the eighteen fifties. Trust yourself, doctor G.
Speaker 1: Doctors of TikTok, gatekeeping, and homeopathic, they only allow five.
Speaker 1: Now you still love as many as you well up
Speaker 1: to a point in character length, but now they only
Speaker 1: allow five hashtags. And then this is what this means.
Speaker 1: Because I was wearing a hat. There was a like
Speaker 1: a replica of a wefn ss hat that I happened
Speaker 1: to just find in my grandfather's closet. The man's been
Speaker 1: dead since the last February. They've kept it exactly the
Speaker 1: way he had it, with a few different pieces of
Speaker 1: furniture moved around or whatever, but it's basically his place,
Speaker 1: right in the downstairs of my parents' house. He found
Speaker 1: this at some sort of groad sale or estate sale
Speaker 1: or something like that. One of his hobbies wass to
Speaker 1: go around and try to find, you know, gems, And
Speaker 1: he saw this and thought it was real. Try to
Speaker 1: have my mom put it up on the on eBay
Speaker 1: and they they canceled her entire account. They deleted her
Speaker 1: account for having this right here, so as a joke
Speaker 1: for the most part, you know, I say this.
Speaker 2: The war.
Speaker 6: War.
Speaker 1: That was enough for them to say that I was
Speaker 1: violent and hateful organizations and individuals. There's no place on
Speaker 1: our platform for police or propaganda that I encourages. Blah blah.
Speaker 1: What did I say. I go in to say how apptitude,
Speaker 1: a an injectable drug, is being marketed to uh, those
Speaker 1: of a strange lifestyle in my opinion of man on
Speaker 1: man love making, and as supposed to prevent and shield
Speaker 1: them from an imaginary unicorn that they call HIV AIDS.
Speaker 1: So that's that was my warning to them. I was
Speaker 1: warning them that they're being targeted again, and it's probably
Speaker 1: in the effort to start up another whole epidemic of
Speaker 1: those two things, HIV AIDS, because you ually, it's a
Speaker 1: thing that you try to protect yourself with that these
Speaker 1: demonic sons of bitches who invert everything used to make
Speaker 1: you ill. And then maybe they'll just say it was
Speaker 1: a new strain of COVID and maybe you'll say it's anything.
Speaker 1: Who knows. But if they can get people to walk
Speaker 1: into an injection. The results are not going to be
Speaker 1: good for them. And that was all my warning was.
Speaker 1: And I was upset that these attitude commercials of guys
Speaker 1: with hungry eyes looking at each other and a couple
Speaker 1: of times them kissing was being played during my daughter's
Speaker 1: child account, you know, in a miner's account on YouTube,
Speaker 1: when she was watching a Roadblocks video and a Minecraft video.
Speaker 1: So it happened twice. That was not okay with me.
Speaker 1: Oh what the hell, what the fucking hell? Display capture boom,
Speaker 1: there it goes. Sorry, and that was offensive to me.
Speaker 1: All right, there you go. And this was it. They
Speaker 1: just deleted okay, TikTok, the wre war, that was it,
Speaker 1: like I said, And I go on like I said,
Speaker 1: to explain that all those other things. So why am
Speaker 1: I bringing this up again? Because I want to show
Speaker 1: the history of these people and the lack of their
Speaker 1: integrity and the false the falseness of their claims and
Speaker 1: of their bullshit slow virus nonsense, and how it all
Speaker 1: began with a pedophile who was over and Papua New
Speaker 1: Guinea and he was one of the founding besides Gallo,
Speaker 1: proponents of this whole HIV is connected to AIDS thing,
Speaker 1: and then we can look at reverse transcription these RTP tests,
Speaker 1: rts whatever, you know what I mean, and see how
Speaker 1: much of a fraud that is and how they use
Speaker 1: that for all kinds of things that it makes no
Speaker 1: sense logically for them to use it for. But if
Speaker 1: it can fool you, then that obviously that's the whole goal.
Speaker 1: That is the purpose, that is its use. So here
Speaker 1: we go. This is Papa New Guinea Pigs Jamie Deluxe again.
Speaker 1: If you don't hear it, Hey, Mike, what's going on?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, special thanks to all the people out there
Speaker 1: who have been super supportive and awesome. Matthew, Wooton, Mike, Karen,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna miss names. I haven't seen Saxon Raging or
Speaker 1: Slash Voodoo ranging a little bit. But you know, you
Speaker 1: know who you are. We're on you know, friendly terms,
Speaker 1: and I'm always trying to do my best to mention
Speaker 1: you without embarrassing or you know, putting you on the
Speaker 1: spot or whatever. But just wanted to let you know
Speaker 1: that I do appreciate your support, friendship, kindness, all that stuff,
Speaker 1: and it's always always appreciated. All right, now let's go
Speaker 1: to this again. Please, tell me in the comments if
Speaker 1: you don't hear this, because I'm trying something a little
Speaker 1: bit different today, seeing what I can work around. I'm
Speaker 1: using my road caster to record the audio because Rubble
Speaker 1: doesn't do that for you. And that's one of the
Speaker 1: only reasons besides having guests on that I still even
Speaker 1: keep stream Yard because there's so many little spots that
Speaker 1: I can sabotage you, Like yesterday, I was showing you
Speaker 1: a really nice Victorian house and it wasn't green. It
Speaker 1: is green, but because I had this green screen on,
Speaker 1: even though I was minimizing and working through obs, Streamyard
Speaker 1: still keeps the green screen, you know, functionality. Even if
Speaker 1: you're minimized, it doesn't minimize the green screen effect. It
Speaker 1: puts it on the full screen. So yeah, lesson learned.
Speaker 1: There another sabotage. Now what am I looking for? Oh yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: that's just that one. Let's go to.
Speaker 5: This.
Speaker 1: I'll show you the picture I was talking about, cause
Speaker 1: it looks it looks much better in color. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: by the way, if you're on if you're on my Patreon,
Speaker 1: you should really watch this. This is atrocious. It happened
Speaker 1: in my college town, and let's see Okay, so this
Speaker 1: picture was right here. Let's see theres she is? Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: would be the next that one right there. So now
Speaker 1: hopefully it looks the green that it's supposed to be.
Speaker 1: And my mother went to see that house when it
Speaker 1: was for sale a while back, a couple of years ago.
Speaker 1: Needed a lot of work. It looks really awesome right now.
Speaker 1: Those Victorian style houses are huge and really cool looking
Speaker 1: inside and out if you maintain it and keep it
Speaker 1: as much to the tradition and time period that it
Speaker 1: was intended to be. On the interior, hardwood floors, vaulted ceilings,
Speaker 1: all that good stuff. All right. Must be a bitch
Speaker 1: to keep warm in the wintertime, though expensive anyway, all right,
Speaker 1: we should be good. It was one last time I
Speaker 1: wanted to double check to see if anybody is commenting, Mike,
Speaker 1: is the uh is holding down the floors here? Did
Speaker 1: it pop up? Hmm? I'm not seeing it pending mhmm. Interesting,
Speaker 1: Oh I see why because I am paused on the preview,
Speaker 1: it probably did pop up. Okay.
Speaker 7: Carlton Gaidarshik, who performed questionable research in which he never
Speaker 7: could isolate a virus from Kuru disease, nevertheless became known
Speaker 7: as the father of the slow virus idea.
Speaker 8: The virus hunters still had many weapons to pull from
Speaker 8: their box of tricks.
Speaker 1: Remember Guidashek is the name Gaidak. Keep that name in mind,
Speaker 1: and then you'll see some of the strange shit that
Speaker 1: I was up to. I just wanted to check one
Speaker 1: last thing here. I can't click this if it's in
Speaker 1: full screen. We don't think we really needed to be
Speaker 1: in full screen, all right, anyway.
Speaker 8: Such as the concept of the slow virus, a virus
Speaker 8: capable of sleeping in a cell for years before striking
Speaker 8: with it's pathogenic phytoal efpics.
Speaker 1: Again, the whole concept of virus has never been proven.
Speaker 1: But they're going to take another leap here. And this
Speaker 1: is where we need to understand that they're just building
Speaker 1: upon another a foundation of bullshit in the first place,
Speaker 1: or at least not proven. I mean, if you want
Speaker 1: to be kind about it, and they're just steamrolling people.
Speaker 1: But they're so adamant about you doing certain medical procedures
Speaker 1: to prevent something that they've never actually have been able
Speaker 1: to does anything, or that it even is a thing.
Speaker 1: The whole idea and concept of this so a poisoning
Speaker 1: event by any other means, the weakening of people through
Speaker 1: poor nutrition and stresses, and then the introduction of some
Speaker 1: sort of technology radio frequency whatever, that disrupts your own
Speaker 1: frequency and throws you off balance, some other type of
Speaker 1: poison that they've been introduced to mankind. And then they
Speaker 1: where they have introduced this stuff you see around there,
Speaker 1: that's like the epicenter for all these outbreaks. They never
Speaker 1: want to show you what's really going on and how
Speaker 1: it's really affecting people, or what's actually really affecting people.
Speaker 1: They blame it on a unicorn that they've never ever
Speaker 1: been able to prove. They've never been able to isolate,
Speaker 1: they've never been able to reproduce what they say is
Speaker 1: in an infection or a contagion in any of these attempts.
Speaker 1: But yet the band plays on and your child has
Speaker 1: to get seventy plus injections in order to go through
Speaker 1: indoctrination into a parent destroying system building, redirection of them
Speaker 1: and guidance for them to believe and think in their way.
Speaker 8: The claim that a disease takes a very long time
Speaker 8: decades to break out, gained popularity in the nineteen sixties,
Speaker 8: when virus hunters can convinced the medical establishment that the
Speaker 8: virus concept could even be imposed on cancer, that is,
Speaker 8: a disease that generally appears after years or decades. But
Speaker 8: despite a most arduous search, researchers were simply unable to
Speaker 8: find any active viruses and tumors. The disappointment and frustration
Speaker 8: was correspondingly great, but a new theory was soon developed
Speaker 8: that a virus could provoke an infection, then lie dormant
Speaker 8: in a cell for as long as it wanted, and finally,
Speaker 8: at some point trigger cancer even when the virus is
Speaker 8: no longer present, just as with polio. Earlier, the genome
Speaker 8: of a so called slow virus had never been isolated,
Speaker 8: and the particles claimed to be slow viruses have never
Speaker 8: been imaged with an electron microscope. But the virus hunters
Speaker 8: embraced the suspect theory and adapted it to a number
Speaker 8: of modern ailments.
Speaker 9: We interrupt our program to bring you this important message.
Speaker 4: This video is sponsored by you, the viewer.
Speaker 10: I've had a sponsor.
Speaker 4: Before, I didn't like it, so I'm not sponsored, nor
Speaker 4: am I monetized anywhere. So anything I do make comes
Speaker 4: from you. So if you like what I do, and
Speaker 4: you want to support the cause, you can shoot me
Speaker 4: a tip or support to my PayPal demo cash app below,
Speaker 4: or you can drink the lunatic Pedophile the lunatic I've
Speaker 4: already made a couple of videos about this before, Carlton
Speaker 4: Gai Dashik, the lunatic pedophile who, like most government scientists today,
Speaker 4: cling to their hypothesis and force all data to fit
Speaker 4: it in one way or another. He's a guy that
Speaker 4: came up with the slow virus theory or unconventional virus
Speaker 4: and without that they can never have blamed AIDS on HIV.
Speaker 4: I'll leave links to my videos below along with links
Speaker 4: to all other sources that I use in this video.
Speaker 11: Australian scientist, Professor Michael Alpers has dedicated over fifty years
Speaker 11: researching Kuru, an incurable brain disease unique to Papua and
Speaker 11: New Guinea.
Speaker 1: So again, incurable because nothing can be cured by mds,
Speaker 1: because they're symptoms suppressors. They're not attempting to find recause
Speaker 1: on anything but regardless of what their rhetoric is, and
Speaker 1: they never look at the simple common things like parasites
Speaker 1: or malnutrition of a certain thing that could cause any
Speaker 1: of these things. They don't look at that. Remember, they're
Speaker 1: they're smarter than that. Of course, of course they are.
Speaker 1: There's gotta be some out way out there concept of
Speaker 1: an invisible enemy.
Speaker 3: First reports about kuru in the general literature came from
Speaker 3: anthropologists describing kuru as a psychosomatic disease. Some kind of reaction.
Speaker 1: To it says here, what causes psychosomatic symptoms in illness?
Speaker 1: Psychosomatic illness, psychosomatic disorders, and psychosomatic symptoms are usually caused
Speaker 1: by medium to high levels of stress, anxiety, or depression.
Speaker 1: Simply put, it's a mind and body phenomenon. But it's
Speaker 1: also a little more complicated than that. Okay, so they're
Speaker 1: going to say that these people are basically doing it
Speaker 1: to themselves because the mind is a powerful thing. That's
Speaker 1: that's their way of describing it at first. Okay, sure,
Speaker 1: good change, And I don't there's nothing I'm not taking
Speaker 1: away from the idea that psychosomatic things do occur. I mean,
Speaker 1: look at what happened with C. Nineteen. There was a
Speaker 1: lot of the true let's put it this way, it
Speaker 1: was more of the fear that any little cough all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, now meant that this. It was that
Speaker 1: one thing. So they went rushing to find a remedy
Speaker 1: for that and started taking fractionated nutrition, high doses of
Speaker 1: vitamin DC and so on, and giving themselves cataracts and
Speaker 1: all kinds of problems because of it. Zinc at higher
Speaker 1: levels causes cataracts. Did these are these are the people
Speaker 1: that were supposed to be on the outside of the
Speaker 1: conventional doing exactly the same thing by doing it with
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical engineered vitamins supplements instead.
Speaker 3: Mentioned the world with the advent of the Australian administration,
Speaker 3: I found it exotic.
Speaker 11: After three months in the field, he was no closer
Speaker 11: to solving the puzzle that was Koru. Then he met
Speaker 11: American virologist Carlton Geijersek, the only other medical researcher dedicated
Speaker 11: to trying to understand this strange disease.
Speaker 12: Everything was perfect. He was the right person in the
Speaker 12: right place the right time. That's just he was extraordinarily
Speaker 12: fortunate that that should have happened to him.
Speaker 1: Just doing more testa to see if anybody's complaining about audio,
Speaker 1: if you have issues, tell me everything's good. What's up, Mike?
Speaker 1: I know there's a bit of a delayed here today,
Speaker 1: all right, sounds like everything's good. Let's keep rolling.
Speaker 4: Good.
Speaker 13: Although he had no permission, resources for equipment, Carlton canceled
Speaker 13: his return flight to the US.
Speaker 1: He had nothing to conduct any of his funny blogne
Speaker 1: you know, parlor tricks. But he still stayed there because
Speaker 1: you know, there's a bunch of vulnerable little boys here.
Speaker 1: It's like a holiday for degenerates.
Speaker 13: He set up a small lab in the jungle and
Speaker 13: started to dissect the victims of the disease when his
Speaker 13: kitchen table didn't take very long to really he.
Speaker 1: Was dissecting the victims of the disease on his kitchen table.
Speaker 1: Just fire that away is.
Speaker 3: That we were both on the same wavelength in terms
Speaker 3: of our attitude to the world and where we thought
Speaker 3: what we were doing would fit in.
Speaker 4: Before making it to the south fora tribe, the study Kuru,
Speaker 4: Carlton stopped off to say with the cucka cucka tribe.
Speaker 12: Carlton writes in his diary about how he loved the
Speaker 12: smell of the cooker cooker male adolescence, the smell of
Speaker 12: grease pig fat.
Speaker 1: With smell of the adolescence, the virility and the and
Speaker 1: the smell of the essence of little boys. That's where
Speaker 1: he stopped to.
Speaker 12: Say, fires and seamen.
Speaker 1: Now fires and semen. Ah, yeah, that doesn't get any
Speaker 1: better than that, right, it's fucking rider. People are all sick,
Speaker 1: and these are these are the ones that weren't supposed
Speaker 1: to question, you know, trust the science that isn't science.
Speaker 12: Whether he actively participated any of these practices is another matter.
Speaker 14: I have never once taken a kid to my bed.
Speaker 14: They have come to my bed, and I am no
Speaker 14: one to kick them out. If they hug me and
Speaker 14: I find them playing with my cock, I sayd good
Speaker 14: on you. I play with theirs, and I'll do it
Speaker 14: now and with great pleasure.
Speaker 12: But did he just fantasize about his participation, But they
Speaker 12: clearly fascinated him.
Speaker 13: Guide your Shik's fascination had deep roots for years.
Speaker 1: He had recorded in he Was a Goddamn Predator.
Speaker 13: Journal his anguish of his attraction to young boys.
Speaker 14: With three or four hundred boys who had sex with
Speaker 14: me from eight to ten and twelve one hundred percent
Speaker 14: have run into my bed, jumped in without my mentioning it,
Speaker 14: and asked for sex.
Speaker 11: Carlton had done every medical test known to science, in
Speaker 11: particular investigating the prime suspect anal probes cannibalism.
Speaker 14: Everybody's been thinking cannibalism, everybody I met from the before
Speaker 14: I saw korl. But we'd found that that couldn't be
Speaker 14: the case. We had no inflammation, all the medical reasons
Speaker 14: for not and we threw it out.
Speaker 11: Cannibalism had to be dismissed when every one of Carlton's
Speaker 11: tests on animals demonstrated that Kuru was neither infectious nor transmissible.
Speaker 1: We had neither infects, it's just nor transmissible. But that
Speaker 1: didn't stop him. That didn't stop him, So it probably
Speaker 1: wasn't parasitic.
Speaker 14: Fraculate everything from snakes to bears, and we had watched
Speaker 14: them for one, two, three, four, six months zero.
Speaker 10: This was something new.
Speaker 1: But I don't know if you noticed that all these
Speaker 1: people are emaciated, they're not eating properly, they're not getting
Speaker 1: full nutrition. But let's not look in that direction as
Speaker 1: to why they might be having some problems.
Speaker 14: I didn't know anything about what it was, but it
Speaker 14: was certainly no.
Speaker 11: No human disease had ever taken more than a few
Speaker 11: weeks for infection to surface. And more significantly, no degenerative
Speaker 11: brain disease headaches.
Speaker 1: So that again to me, points toward a deficiency that
Speaker 1: over time, not treated, just gets worse and worse and
Speaker 1: produces a symptom. And if it's something like the lack
Speaker 1: of cholesterol that affects your brain, I'm not saying it's
Speaker 1: cholesterol related. I'm just saying that's just one idea, and
Speaker 1: that's one thing that could develop into something like you
Speaker 1: know when you take statins and it disrupts your cholesterol
Speaker 1: and you have new cholesterol to manufacture hormones, and then
Speaker 1: you get dementia because your brain is mostly cholesterol.
Speaker 11: Ever been shown to be transmissible between humans, and.
Speaker 3: If we were able to share that Kuru was transmissible,
Speaker 3: this would open up a new field in human myths.
Speaker 3: There was no question about it.
Speaker 1: So they manufactured that because if they could show it,
Speaker 1: then they'd be rich and famous in PROFI yeah, oh yeah, becausese.
Speaker 1: If it's true or not, there's an industry here that.
Speaker 3: People would have to take notice.
Speaker 11: But first Michael and Carlton had to embark on something
Speaker 11: no scientist had ever attempted.
Speaker 3: This meant that we had to do transmission experiments with
Speaker 3: the expectation of incredibly long incubation periods.
Speaker 1: So just imagine you're a tribe that's completely isolated from
Speaker 1: the rest of the world. Who shows up to start
Speaker 1: investigating an illness in your town in your tribe to
Speaker 1: sexual predators. Good time.
Speaker 11: Sir Michael then said about finding a suitable patient for
Speaker 11: the autopsy.
Speaker 3: I knew Kageya as a young girl in the village.
Speaker 3: The rumor was that she had kuru, so I went
Speaker 3: to see her, and she would have been a little
Speaker 3: bit unsteady on her feet. In this context here where kuru.
Speaker 1: Is again, it's pretty obvious just by looking at their
Speaker 1: emaciated bodies that they're not eating very well.
Speaker 3: The dominant disease, you know what the outcome is, even
Speaker 3: if I'm an eleven year old, will know that she's
Speaker 3: got this disease and she's going to die.
Speaker 11: Michael meets with Kageya's family to seek permission to perform
Speaker 11: the autopsy. The family agrees, and over the next six months,
Speaker 11: Michael observes and records the deterioration of Kaa.
Speaker 1: And so rather than trying to help her in any way,
Speaker 1: shape or form, they're waiting for they're just waiting for
Speaker 1: her to die so they can rip her apart. That's
Speaker 1: the short and long of it. Right, Kuru begins to
Speaker 1: take its course.
Speaker 3: So it was she was, she was wonderful young girl.
Speaker 3: I'll never forget her.
Speaker 1: Sick fuck right, yeah, the face of a demon. Right there.
Speaker 11: A call goes out from the s how many.
Speaker 1: Times they were sectually abusing the people who were afflicted?
Speaker 11: Hamlet Kageya has finally died.
Speaker 1: Well, then you listen to just the way that was phrased,
Speaker 1: has finally died, like, oh fucking thank god? You know,
Speaker 1: waited so long.
Speaker 3: Half an hour.
Speaker 11: Michael arrives at the house.
Speaker 3: There was grieving, shouting, whaling, and all the whaling and crying.
Speaker 3: So didn't help, really and.
Speaker 1: Professional, right, all the all the human emotion didn't help.
Speaker 1: This is these people. Stop grieving. You're you're you're messing
Speaker 1: up my concentration. All right, good, it sounds fine, Thank
Speaker 1: you man. I appreciate that. I don't have to keep
Speaker 1: looking and going back and forth. Now that's great, good times. Okay,
Speaker 1: back to.
Speaker 3: It activity of doing a good autopsy. But I shut
Speaker 3: that out. I couldn't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so that's not too hard. For you to
Speaker 1: shut out human emotion and empathy or compassion when you
Speaker 1: don't have any in yourself.
Speaker 3: To Guy's features, she was ahead. I had to get
Speaker 3: the skull off, I had to get the brain out,
Speaker 3: and we had to go quickly, and we did that.
Speaker 3: There was no turning back.
Speaker 11: Michael leaves the Foray for Washington, DC, where Carlton has
Speaker 11: organized a facility for the transmission experiment.
Speaker 13: Here, the samples of.
Speaker 11: Kuru are injected into the brains of two chimpanzees.
Speaker 1: So if you inject anything into the brain of anything,
Speaker 1: you're going to cause a massive shock to the system.
Speaker 1: This isn't how it would be done in reality or nature. Anyway,
Speaker 1: people weren't getting sick because they were having something injected
Speaker 1: into their brains. So to do that, to try to
Speaker 1: establish contagion in an unnatural manner of trying to be
Speaker 1: or you know, being exposed to something, isn't an experiment
Speaker 1: at all. That's just torture. That's just sick, sick like
Speaker 1: like vivisection level disgusting. This none of this makes any
Speaker 1: sense because you should have to do it in the
Speaker 1: same way that you would expect these other people to
Speaker 1: have caught it in order for it to make any sense.
Speaker 1: You inject anything into something's brain, you're gonna cause some
Speaker 1: serious problems that in that individual or animal. That does
Speaker 1: not in any way, if you inject anything into any
Speaker 1: part of your body, it's going to cause a shock,
Speaker 1: because that's not natural. But here we are. This is
Speaker 1: our science, Daisy and George.
Speaker 8: It a close lock at gedge dezx trials on apes
Speaker 8: with which he aimed to show transmissibility, should have shocked
Speaker 8: the scientific community into disbelief. But instead they recognize these
Speaker 8: papers as proof of transmissibility and ignored the fact that
Speaker 8: neither feeding the apes brain mush nor injecting them with
Speaker 8: it had any effect on the chimpanzees. So Gage do.
Speaker 1: Zeke, So any of the manners in which a normal
Speaker 1: exposure to something, if they're believing in this idea of
Speaker 1: a contingent, would have produced something didn't work. It didn't
Speaker 1: pan out. But hey, if we inject a slurry of
Speaker 1: brain matter and whatever the hell else chemicals they added
Speaker 1: to it into the brains of something, Oh my god,
Speaker 1: look now they're sick too and dying. Well, no shit,
Speaker 1: no shit.
Speaker 8: Conducted a bizarre experiment in order to finally induce neural
Speaker 8: symptoms and the taste animals. He ground out the brain
Speaker 8: of a carey patient into a mush full of proteins,
Speaker 8: along with a number of other.
Speaker 1: Substances, A number of other substances. Again, would those have
Speaker 1: been at present? How is this scientific experimentation? How is it?
Speaker 1: And how does this pass? How do we go from
Speaker 1: here to HIV causes aids? How do you go from
Speaker 1: here to there is a V word in the first
Speaker 1: place that's causing any of this.
Speaker 8: I poured this into the living apes by drilling holes
Speaker 8: into their skulls. This so called disease's alleged transmissibility was
Speaker 8: founded only upon these experiments. How could it possibly derive
Speaker 8: proof of gadgetx cannibalistic hypothesis, particularly since the hypothesis proposes
Speaker 8: that the disease could appear in humans through ingestion of
Speaker 8: infected brains and not through direct surgical insertion into the brain.
Speaker 11: Two years after being injected with infected brain tissue, the
Speaker 11: chimpanzees developed kuru. The significance of.
Speaker 1: This outcome, and again, kuru is just a word to
Speaker 1: describe a cursory observation of something. They damaged the brain
Speaker 1: by injecting a bunch of shit into someone's brain and
Speaker 1: then said, hey, look it's a virus. We got it.
Speaker 1: We win parlor tricks, sorcery, butchery, savagery. That is the
Speaker 1: science that this whole entire world operates on, and it's
Speaker 1: completely unscientific. This is little sorcery pharmaciea same as it
Speaker 1: ever freaking was just they wear different outfits. Now they're
Speaker 1: not wearing black, hooded freaking robes and all that shit.
Speaker 11: Oh well, couldn't be overstated. They had discovered a totally
Speaker 11: new type of human disease. It was the first time
Speaker 11: a human degenerative brain disease had been shown to be transmissible.
Speaker 4: And what's more, it had the longest.
Speaker 1: Oh it wasn't.
Speaker 11: Incubation period of any human disease known to science.
Speaker 3: These are very exciting times, I mean intellectual, very exciting.
Speaker 3: You know, we'd achieved a lot.
Speaker 1: And it was clear they are patting themselves on the
Speaker 1: back for this shit. They're excited, Yes, not notoriety. Hey
Speaker 1: look we're part of the sick freaking cult. Now they'll
Speaker 1: remember our names.
Speaker 3: Yeah that this probably meant a Nobel prize.
Speaker 1: See you see where the real motivation here is.
Speaker 11: Fulton's team discovered that the particle causing the disease was
Speaker 11: a thousand times smaller than any other known infecting agent.
Speaker 1: And how did they figure that out? Since they can't
Speaker 1: even figure out that this is a completely bogus way
Speaker 1: of looking at this, now they're going to make up
Speaker 1: some other thing that's really hard for anybody else to
Speaker 1: argue with. It's got to be the super super super
Speaker 1: tiny thing. A right, A right. It's almost as if
Speaker 1: it's not there at all. It's almost as if the
Speaker 1: whole thing is a fraud.
Speaker 11: And found only in the brain and spinal cord. But
Speaker 11: exactly how it caused the infection was still a complete mystery.
Speaker 14: But I wun't find an antibioty, and we still can,
Speaker 14: so everything about it is unique.
Speaker 1: Here's your antidote. Don't inject chemicals and brain matter into
Speaker 1: the brains of other creatures.
Speaker 6: Ta da.
Speaker 14: Cool is still today that every infection on Earth produces antibioty,
Speaker 14: no exception on Earth, no aid's patient.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, that's all bugus do.
Speaker 14: And on Earth, touch on. That's the important rule. So
Speaker 14: I called it an unconventional.
Speaker 11: Virus, and in nineteen seventy sex.
Speaker 1: Look at me with all my vagueness. I get a
Speaker 1: Nobel Peace Prize for all my vagueness and stupidity. That's
Speaker 1: that's great, that's great. Let's let's let's champion these fucking psychopaths.
Speaker 11: Carlton finally won the Nobel Prize for his discovery of
Speaker 11: what he called an unconventional virus.
Speaker 1: It's unconventional because we can't make any sense of what
Speaker 1: the hell we just did. But hey, there's money to
Speaker 1: be had here.
Speaker 11: He wasn't the only one hungry for a Nobel prize.
Speaker 14: But I didn't think these particles were viruses.
Speaker 10: I didn't think they were slow viruses. I didn't think
Speaker 10: they were unconventional viruses.
Speaker 15: I thought they were different.
Speaker 14: Well, it's a virus.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 11: However, biochemist Stanley Prusner disagreed and gave Carlton's virus a name,
Speaker 11: identifying it as a protein particle he called a prion,
Speaker 11: starting one of the most bitter rivalries in science.
Speaker 14: Stan says, it's not a virus, it's a priory. That's
Speaker 14: not a discovery.
Speaker 1: That's a word, So is virus genius. So it's saying
Speaker 1: it's unconventional. Those are just words and Frian isn't any
Speaker 1: more legitimate either.
Speaker 4: The one thing I agree with them on. When someone
Speaker 4: can't quote discover something, they just make up a new
Speaker 4: word or change a definition.
Speaker 11: Prusner would have have to wait another twenty years to
Speaker 11: win his Nobel prize. Oh poor guy, his findings turning
Speaker 11: the world of science upside down.
Speaker 1: It looks like he should be a composer or a
Speaker 1: conductor of an orchestra. They yeah, pons ignor. They are
Speaker 1: making people dance.
Speaker 11: Rules of normal biological reproduction. They recruit rather than reproduce,
Speaker 11: targeting normal proteins and converting them into replicants of themselves.
Speaker 1: That's a process explanation, not a causal causation, Like what
Speaker 1: started this sequence of events off in the first place?
Speaker 1: What was the what initiated it? Not hey, let's watch
Speaker 1: it as it's happening. What was the initial onset and
Speaker 1: how did that occur? Because this idea of an intrusion
Speaker 1: from the outside in and of itself has so many
Speaker 1: holes in it for so many things. Your body is
Speaker 1: really good at maintaining itself and its health when it
Speaker 1: has all the raw materials it needs to do so.
Speaker 1: But of course you know you're injecting something directly into
Speaker 1: the brain of something, it's the whole different story because
Speaker 1: you bypass all of those safeguards and filters like your kidneys,
Speaker 1: like your stomach acids and all this other stuff your liver,
Speaker 1: and you're going directly into the bloodstream or darkly into
Speaker 1: the freaking brain. There's no science here whatsoever. And then
Speaker 1: once it happens, they're saying, oh, well, this is the
Speaker 1: process that occurs. Well, yeah, okay, you poison something, and
Speaker 1: now you're seeing how poison causes more damage down the line.
Speaker 1: But you didn't actually explain this concept of why it
Speaker 1: happened in the first place, except for the simple fact
Speaker 1: that you created an artificial condition that would never have
Speaker 1: happened in that tribe or anywhere else unless they are
Speaker 1: sick weirdo is injecting other which obviously wasn't the case.
Speaker 11: These in turn attack and convert more, building ever increasing
Speaker 11: numbers that kill cells in the brain.
Speaker 14: So now we had a entirely new disease paradigm that
Speaker 14: evolved out of these basic studies in the discovery of
Speaker 14: the prion protein.
Speaker 4: If it wasn't a quote virus or a quote prion,
Speaker 4: what could it.
Speaker 7: Have been virologist Carlton Gai Dashik of the American National
Speaker 7: Institutes of Health, who reported finding evidence of the first
Speaker 7: slow virus in humans. A slow virus is a virus
Speaker 7: alleged to produce a disease long after the original infection,
Speaker 7: that is, after a long latent period. He believed it
Speaker 7: to be the cause of Kuru disease among New Guinea natives.
Speaker 7: Kuru was a slowly progressing neurological disease that led to
Speaker 7: the debilitation of motor skills. The patients presented with symptoms
Speaker 7: of tremor and paralysis similar to Parkinson's disease.
Speaker 13: Guide You schel Get spotted similarities between Kuru and the
Speaker 13: better known afflictions Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
Speaker 1: So isn't that kind of where I was getting at
Speaker 1: with the whole cholesterol deficiency thing Alzheimer's, Yeah, something neurological occurring. Hey,
Speaker 1: they drink shit water too, by the way. Those tribes
Speaker 1: unclean water, very poor nutrition, Mosquito is all over the place,
Speaker 1: and they're barress, naked and starving. None of those factors
Speaker 1: would have caused any kind of disease, of of course,
Speaker 1: though there has to be some imaginary unicorn and a
Speaker 1: very slow imaginary unicorn. Of course, let me just read
Speaker 1: this through fighting the winged scourge. Anti malarial precautions against
Speaker 1: mosquito is adopted by Australian Army during the war were
Speaker 1: based on spray tests conducted by the CSIR and describe
Speaker 1: now for the first time and newly released bulletin killing
Speaker 1: power of sprays was found to depend on the amount
Speaker 1: of uh pithans atomized rather than the volume spray used.
Speaker 1: In Secticides tested include oils of several native plants and
Speaker 1: the widely publicized the d d T oopsy oopsi field
Speaker 1: trials in New Guinea. So they were sprayed with fucking DDT.
Speaker 1: And also no, no, no, no, this is a prion disease.
Speaker 1: Oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no no, this is
Speaker 1: this is a slow virus, right, okay, So the same
Speaker 1: thing that they caused freaking up polio with they sprayed
Speaker 1: New Guinea with field trials in New Guinea supplemented the
Speaker 1: laboratory tests, wild female malaria transmitting mosquitoes were subjected. Again,
Speaker 1: that's yeah, we're subjected to most promising sprays intense and
Speaker 1: airy huts. So they sprayed rating within their dwelling place,
Speaker 1: the homes of these the dwelling places of these people.
Speaker 1: A straight pyrethrine and a high rythan plus DDT spray
Speaker 1: were finally selected for army use. Right, because it's a
Speaker 1: fucking weapon, both sprays killing all mosquitoes in sprayed habitations. Right,
Speaker 1: it kills one living creature, but it's totally okay for
Speaker 1: other ones. Suggestion for DDT dusting In New Guinea, the
Speaker 1: Army showed during the war how to clear an area
Speaker 1: of mosquitoes and anything else that's breathing. Low flying aircraft
Speaker 1: gave a thorough dusting with DDT powder every week, every week,
Speaker 1: every week, and except for occasional ones, the pest disappeared.
Speaker 1: Now I'm curious is what they mean by pests. Why
Speaker 1: can't swampy areas because I've you know, I mean because
Speaker 1: humans I'll live there. Why can't swampy areas around parts
Speaker 1: of Melbourne and other Victorian towns be treated in a
Speaker 1: similar way by the aircraft. Which so now they're trying
Speaker 1: to make an argument for hey, we should do this
Speaker 1: in more highly populated areas all over the place. Yeah, right,
Speaker 1: And this is October twenty eight nineteen fifty five.
Speaker 4: And DDT over pop New Guinea and probably other chemicals too,
Speaker 4: from the gerald Dere Herald and Urana Advertiser. I don't
Speaker 4: know if I said that right. Thursday's going to says
Speaker 4: nineteen forty eight fighting the wing scourge antime malaria Blton
Speaker 4: to nineteen killing power of sprays was found best. I
Speaker 4: just sawed this a pyreethrin and a pyri suggestion for
Speaker 4: GDT dusting. Melbourne and other Victorian towns be treated with
Speaker 4: a similar way by the aircraft which do crop dusting,
Speaker 4: so they were testing there. That's not all I found
Speaker 4: from Guy Dashik's Nobel Pride's biography while at Caltech and
Speaker 4: while with John Enders on postgraduate work.
Speaker 1: I remember the name Enders. He was on the cover
Speaker 1: of People. This was another one of those whack jobs Harvard.
Speaker 4: That's a whole other story.
Speaker 1: Oh sorry, it was time.
Speaker 4: Some of you might be familiar with you people who.
Speaker 1: Call themselves virologists. Surets hell don't want to ever admit
Speaker 1: that there's no such thing as that that little thing
Speaker 1: from which they claim to be an expert on, because
Speaker 1: then now that time and effort is wasted and they
Speaker 1: got to go find something else to do, right, except
Speaker 1: for one guy by the name of doctor Stefan Lanka
Speaker 1: who calls themselves a recovering virologist. He's the one that
Speaker 1: challenged all virus theory. We've talked about him many times,
Speaker 1: especially about four or five years ago, and I have
Speaker 1: a couple of my videos on Rumble of him. I
Speaker 1: just you know, reposted them. Just check them outters.
Speaker 4: I have never abandoned my clinical interest, particularly in pediatrics
Speaker 4: and neurology, which were nurtured by a group of inspiring
Speaker 4: bedside teachers. In one of the teachers, doctor Richard Day,
Speaker 4: at Baby's Hospital Lumbia Presbyteria Medical Center in New York.
Speaker 4: I've made videos about doctor Richard Day before. I'll leave
Speaker 4: links to those below as well. But he was the
Speaker 4: insider and speaker from the New Order of Barbarians, the
Speaker 4: doctor from nineteen sixty nine that gave lectures about how
Speaker 4: the future of medicine was going to be and assuring
Speaker 4: us into a new world order. Not only that, but
Speaker 4: I found connections between doctor Richard Day and Operation paper
Speaker 4: Clip because he brought Albert Spear's daughter Hilda Spear to
Speaker 4: the US.
Speaker 1: Uh shit, see, he's playing a song in the background.
Speaker 1: This is gonna get possibly jostled it because of that.
Speaker 4: The fifties eight off hit. There was architect Albert Speer.
Speaker 1: Who was and this is where people go off the
Speaker 1: rails again and do this whole thing about oh bad
Speaker 1: bad man.
Speaker 4: Yeah, okay, it's in Nuremberg to prison for twenty years. Well,
Speaker 4: his daughter Hilda Spear came to the US in the
Speaker 4: fifties and gets who she lived with doctor day McLean's
Speaker 4: The Waiting Whites of Spandau March fifteenth, nineteen fifty four,
Speaker 4: Jack Fishman. Margaret Spear changed the subject once more. It
Speaker 4: was about her daughter, seventeen year old Hilda. She wanted
Speaker 4: to talk. Last summer, Hilda changed her home in Heidelberg
Speaker 4: for another in Hastings On Hudson, New York. She was
Speaker 4: chosen by the American Board of re Education of the
Speaker 4: US Information.
Speaker 1: Service re Education. So the little Hilda here isn't the problem.
Speaker 1: It's there. They're programming her. You understand what This is
Speaker 1: the same thing that they do to your children when
Speaker 1: you bring them to school. By the way, today it
Speaker 1: was the first day. Luckily, my daughter goes to charter
Speaker 1: school and they're very friendly, friendly, and they involve us
Speaker 1: an awful lot, unlike a public school which wants to
Speaker 1: isolate them from you. And you'll see the change and
Speaker 1: your children as they are socialized to the exposure of
Speaker 1: all types of children and all types of lack of
Speaker 1: discipline and lack of guidance that they're surrounded by and
Speaker 1: you know, hit at from all directions because they don't
Speaker 1: share the same values as the household. But that makes
Speaker 1: you lot to be the bad guy, you remember, because
Speaker 1: that's how it's that's the inference. So you know, things
Speaker 1: slip away, your bonds slip away if you're not actively
Speaker 1: involved in your child's life all the time to give
Speaker 1: them guidance, because there's an awful lot of things working
Speaker 1: against you and the child's natural aggression and development, and
Speaker 1: it's an artificial path that they try to create for them.
Speaker 1: So I'm just warning you that you better be on
Speaker 1: your toes and aware of all the ways that can
Speaker 1: be influenced and how that drives a wedge and dissolves bonds,
Speaker 1: family bonds, because of course, the nanty state wants to
Speaker 1: raise your children and the parents shouldn't have anything to
Speaker 1: do with it. That's what Clinton said. That's what Hilary said.
Speaker 4: Was in Germany as one of a number of pupils
Speaker 4: to spend twelve months at an American school learning a
Speaker 4: democratic way of life. The identity of her father was
Speaker 4: an official secret, and she lived with a doctor, Richard Day,
Speaker 4: a children's doctor and psychologist killed right.
Speaker 1: She was a victim.
Speaker 4: Here's the day family's home life. Attends the local school
Speaker 4: with Day's three daughters and is a regular speaker at
Speaker 4: international youth discussion groups.
Speaker 1: The only people children just want to please, and something
Speaker 1: presented as a guardian authority or father or mother figure,
Speaker 1: they're going to try to please. So they will regurgitate
Speaker 1: what they are expected to say, and they all believe it.
Speaker 4: In the locality aware of her background are Day and
Speaker 4: his wife. Another thing they had in common. Nineteen forty eight,
Speaker 4: the UN sent Guidashek to Germany and he came home
Speaker 4: with a little German boy who he had his mother adopt.
Speaker 1: This is the sick pedophile.
Speaker 13: In nineteen forty eight, the UN sent Gay Duschek on
Speaker 13: a mission to Germany. Carlton grew close to German family.
Speaker 1: So far, I don't see this reflecting pad on the
Speaker 1: national socialists at all, but rather on what they did
Speaker 1: to them afterward, and how they were greeming their children
Speaker 1: of these people into the democratic way of life. And
Speaker 1: then this guy comes over as a child predator post
Speaker 1: war to sweep up some more victims.
Speaker 13: And offered to take the sum to us to be
Speaker 13: educated and see the world. He persuaded his mother to
Speaker 13: adopt the boy. It was to be the start of
Speaker 13: a life devoted to adopted kids.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, he like those, He liked those
Speaker 1: blond hair, blue eyed German boys. Oh yeah, anything to
Speaker 1: destroy their soul forever. Yes, I mean for me to
Speaker 1: be selected.
Speaker 4: By Carlton to come over to this.
Speaker 1: Day to have an opportunity the US defense industry says.
Speaker 1: This guy's I say, is you know? And I trusted
Speaker 1: him implicitly he would take care of me.
Speaker 4: And I thought it was kind of odd that doctor
Speaker 4: Day brought Hilda Spear to the US in the fifties,
Speaker 4: and she went on to become a prominent politician in Germany,
Speaker 4: now known as Hilda Shram. But the little boy that
Speaker 4: guy Dashak had his mother.
Speaker 1: Adopt, drooming and sending back to poison the Germanic culture
Speaker 1: and way of life and thought process, even if I
Speaker 1: didn't know it's going to go this direction when I
Speaker 1: first started this.
Speaker 4: Huh Germany, Wolfgang Klaber went on to become senior director
Speaker 4: of the US defense industry. It seems to me they
Speaker 4: both were involved with paper clip. But that's my opinion.
Speaker 4: But anyway, we can thank this lunatic pedophile, Carlton Gaidajik
Speaker 4: for the slow virus theory, which led everybody to think
Speaker 4: HIV caused AIDS.
Speaker 14: There is what I consider a normal family. He pushes
Speaker 14: and pushes to help mother please, and when that happens,
Speaker 14: you have endearing families for life. If you want tend
Speaker 14: to care for your children, if you want them to
Speaker 14: wipe your ass when you're ninety and you're demented, if
Speaker 14: you want them to stick around when you're sick instead
Speaker 14: of putting you in an old age olcause everybody here
Speaker 14: doesn't never visit them.
Speaker 1: You have to traumatize them and destroy their souls, is
Speaker 1: what he's saying. That's the only way you get children
Speaker 1: to love.
Speaker 14: You want the family to stick together, you have to
Speaker 14: have intradational sex, intergenerational.
Speaker 13: This is where we don't think the same culture.
Speaker 15: I mean, I don't believe this.
Speaker 14: Well, I think it's said. I think the whole problem
Speaker 14: of the whole world is the lack of it, and
Speaker 14: I consider it a defective upbringing if you haven't had
Speaker 14: helped your parents have fun in sex.
Speaker 1: So there you go. These are the bright minds of
Speaker 1: our so called science. Oh boy, oh boy, I think
Speaker 1: this is where we should kick off with this one.
Speaker 4: Since HIV has never been isolated or purified, that also
Speaker 4: means that it's never been proven to exist, let alone
Speaker 4: cause any kind of disease.
Speaker 5: In science, certain rules must be followed for any agent
Speaker 5: to be considered a cause of a factor in disease.
Speaker 5: The first rule is that an agent that is going
Speaker 5: to be bla for a disease should be able to
Speaker 5: be isolated from each and every case at the disease.
Speaker 5: That is not true in HIV and AIDS.
Speaker 16: Nobody can find free infectious HIV virus in a human being.
Speaker 16: That is why they have to resort to looking for
Speaker 16: antibodies to HIV and a person. That is one of
Speaker 16: the biggest flaws in the HIV hypothesis that antibodies, which
Speaker 16: are a sign of immunity. You should be happy that
Speaker 16: you have antibodies.
Speaker 1: It means that, yeah, here's the thing. This goes right
Speaker 1: back to the whole pleomorphic microzym that will create whatever
Speaker 1: it needs to create in order to defend and rebalance
Speaker 1: the system that it finds itself in. This is not
Speaker 1: indication of any virus. This is indication of a poisoning event,
Speaker 1: of some other massive stress that the body couldn't handle,
Speaker 1: and therefore something had to change inside in order for
Speaker 1: it to at least make the effort to And then
Speaker 1: if you see residuals of that effort in the body,
Speaker 1: you're saying, oh, that's proof that the cause that we're
Speaker 1: claiming for all these illnesses is correct. And that's not
Speaker 1: even logical. It's not even logical. You are now immune.
Speaker 16: And yet with AIDS we have antibodies as a predictor
Speaker 16: or an indicator of AIDS and future death.
Speaker 17: HIV has never been proven to exist.
Speaker 1: So these tests were given out. They would claim that
Speaker 1: you had something because of some tests that couldn't test
Speaker 1: for anything in reality. And once they deemed you ill
Speaker 1: with this, the treatments began and the very thing that
Speaker 1: they predicted occurred. You went from whatever your you know,
Speaker 1: malaise was whatever your your symptoms were to full blown
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call AIDS. Because of the AZT
Speaker 1: and all the other drugs that they threw into your system,
Speaker 1: they slowly murdered you. And ah see, look AIGs is
Speaker 1: really deadly. And HIV did it because we said that
Speaker 1: you were positive. It's all a freaking production. It's all
Speaker 1: a play. It's all artificial world concepts and perception from
Speaker 1: start to finish. The whole thing's a fraud, all of it.
Speaker 1: Not the fact that people got sick, not the fact
Speaker 1: that people got sick during C nineteen, but what it did,
Speaker 1: what did it and how bad it would have been
Speaker 1: without the intervention or the eatro genesis of these doctors. Now,
Speaker 1: that's that's where you gotta look. You gotta look at
Speaker 1: and see, Okay, without any of this other shit happening,
Speaker 1: if we just gave the body the string it needed
Speaker 1: for whatever thing was going on in it, give it
Speaker 1: all the essentials that it needs, and see if there's
Speaker 1: a difference in the complaints of the individual. And sometimes
Speaker 1: it needs a little more, Sometimes it needs a little
Speaker 1: balancing of Sometimes the frequency signature of the homeopathic needs
Speaker 1: to be felt, and it's not I want to say,
Speaker 1: it's not exactly like what do you call it destructive interference,
Speaker 1: Because if it's the same if it's the same frequency
Speaker 1: pattern as what is causing the illness in your body,
Speaker 1: the upsetting of the re configuring or calibration of some
Speaker 1: sort of frequency that your boy's given off, that's making
Speaker 1: the imbalance in the first place. That introduction is basically
Speaker 1: triggering the microzyma to take action. So again, it's part
Speaker 1: of what you're doing to make yourself better, and sometimes
Speaker 1: it just needs a little hands, a little reminder of
Speaker 1: what's going on. It's it's really not that hard. I mean,
Speaker 1: it is complicated, I guess, but when you get it,
Speaker 1: when you boil it down to a certain it's not
Speaker 1: even metaphysical, but it's energetic, and you understand that everything
Speaker 1: has its own like vibration to it. And when you
Speaker 1: throw something off and you make it on balance, remember
Speaker 1: like doctor Glyndon says, like this, and you set it
Speaker 1: right again and you give it the body of the
Speaker 1: strength to do what it eas to do. Homeostasis comes
Speaker 1: again right balance. But when you start throwing suppressant drugs
Speaker 1: on it, and through your own self deception, think that
Speaker 1: you need to eliminate white blood cells, or whatever the
Speaker 1: case may be, with with dangerous deadly drugs like chemo
Speaker 1: and radiation or whatever it's going to happen next, depending
Speaker 1: on what the diagnosis is. You're not going anywhere closer
Speaker 1: to fixing anything. You're you're self fulfilling the prophecy of death,
Speaker 1: almost like the Shakespearean plays where the protagonist hears too
Speaker 1: much of his uh of his future from the oracle
Speaker 1: and does everything they can to try to prevent it. Oppositionally,
Speaker 1: and by taking those making those choices and doing those
Speaker 1: actions actually helps them bring about that very thing.
Speaker 17: Because it's neither being purified nor isolated. Orthodoxy has given
Speaker 17: the name HIV to certain stretches of genetic material, but
Speaker 17: the so called retrovirus HIV has never been obtained directly
Speaker 17: from a person's blood.
Speaker 18: There is no way to test for HIV. This is
Speaker 18: because all the tastes are based on indirect markers, none
Speaker 18: of which has been validated.
Speaker 1: By Yeah, it's really pesky when things that don't exist
Speaker 1: are hard to find, proving that.
Speaker 18: The markers are positive only when the virus is present.
Speaker 19: I really would like to see the electron microscopic data
Speaker 19: of this, and apparently there is none. There is none
Speaker 19: where you've done a rigorous isolation protocol.
Speaker 1: And here's the funny thing. Bey Schamp also had created
Speaker 1: his own what they called looking glass or whatever it was.
Speaker 1: It was a type of a microscope where he could
Speaker 1: observe living tissue. When you get into these, oh it's
Speaker 1: super super tiny. These are often what they're seeing is
Speaker 1: artifacts of the process of preparing a sample for an
Speaker 1: electron microscope. And it has absolutely no basis in reality
Speaker 1: in the living creature or how anything functions in a
Speaker 1: living creature. And I believe it was Spacebusters Steve Falconer
Speaker 1: who said in one of his videos that that's like
Speaker 1: taking a hand, cutting it off, putting it in a
Speaker 1: blender and taking a sample of it and putting on
Speaker 1: a slide and looking at it to try to understand
Speaker 1: the function of a hand when it's on a body.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make any logical sense. So also Royal Raymond Rife,
Speaker 1: who was still thinking kind of in the allopathic ways.
Speaker 1: He didn't quite see what he would understand what he
Speaker 1: was seeing, but he could see living blood, He could
Speaker 1: see living tissue in his in his very elaborate microscope
Speaker 1: that they obviously confiscated and disassembled. Then they who knows
Speaker 1: what they actually used it for, But we don't get
Speaker 1: to see that because that blows all their theories and
Speaker 1: the reason why they don't want to have any of
Speaker 1: these answers, because this is the cult of death. Every
Speaker 1: industry that they control, they try to maximize the amount
Speaker 1: of harmic and cause, and by inversion tell you that
Speaker 1: this is the way to health, or that there's the
Speaker 1: way to freedom, or whatever the hell it is that
Speaker 1: they're doing financial freedom all the artificial constructs that they've created,
Speaker 1: because again, that which is not whole, that which is
Speaker 1: not integer, can only create the artificial. They need an
Speaker 1: artificial world because they can't they can't operate or survive
Speaker 1: in the real world in reality. They can't deceive without
Speaker 1: creating and convincing you of something artificial, so that they
Speaker 1: pull you from the reel into the fake, into the
Speaker 1: artificial with them, so that your concepts and your perception
Speaker 1: of all things are now through their artificial filth, so
Speaker 1: that the next step, oh logically, this must be the
Speaker 1: next step. Have the Federal Reserve, though dollars failing, well,
Speaker 1: we mustn't have digital currency more even more artificial than
Speaker 1: the first thing that was counterfeit. This is just okay, well, Ai,
Speaker 1: you know, we can't metaverse. You got to pull you
Speaker 1: completely out of reality so that your your eyes aren't
Speaker 1: even seeing what's in front of you. You gotta put
Speaker 1: goggles on until we can put implants or some sort
Speaker 1: of chip in you so that you see whatever we
Speaker 1: want to see you to see. Because we've hijacked and
Speaker 1: low jacked or whatever. Your system isn't that brilliant. That's hell,
Speaker 1: that's what that is. And these are the sorcerers, not
Speaker 1: this woman. But you understand what I'm talking about. Papadopolis,
Speaker 1: Sonsi Greek cool.
Speaker 18: All the HIV literature which exists today, I think one
Speaker 18: will find it bold and incredible to still believe that
Speaker 18: there is proof for the existence of HIV. When a
Speaker 18: particle looks like eretrovirus, you have to isolate it, then
Speaker 18: put it in another culture. Show that the cells in
Speaker 18: the secondary culture produce particle exactly like the particles from
Speaker 18: which they originated. That the two particles from the two
Speaker 18: cultures are exactly the same can be shown only by
Speaker 18: detamining their constituent proteins and RNA, So isolation is extremely
Speaker 18: important to prove that the particle is a retrovirus.
Speaker 19: Where's the original paper that isolated HIV so that nothing
Speaker 19: else was present and they actually could go and find
Speaker 19: what the proteins were and the nucleic acids were. I
Speaker 19: think you won't find that paper because it has no
Speaker 19: published yet. I've never seen a clear demonstration I mean
Speaker 19: of a direct isolation of HIV from patience.
Speaker 16: There's no published a picture of HIV from a human sample,
Speaker 16: from a blood sample, a tissue sample. You can't find
Speaker 16: HIV in humans now.
Speaker 20: Doctor Gallen, Doctor cat, She talked a lot about isolation
Speaker 20: and purification.
Speaker 14: Can you tell me what the differences between the two.
Speaker 4: Isolate?
Speaker 10: What was the isolation and purification.
Speaker 4: Of the virus?
Speaker 21: Yes, well, you isolate a virus by finding the virus
Speaker 21: which causes a disease. You purify a virus by making
Speaker 21: a lot of them. I mean just by purifying so
Speaker 21: you get a pure virus. Okay, I don't understand what they.
Speaker 20: Interchanged the two and I wasn't it was the same
Speaker 20: thing or that was too totally different.
Speaker 21: No, it depends on how they use.
Speaker 20: Can you explain the process of HIV isolation.
Speaker 21: Well, I didn't doctor Gallow do that. I mean he
Speaker 21: actually isolated it. So I mean, why should I do.
Speaker 10: All of this?
Speaker 1: This is all textbook stuff you're asking me.
Speaker 10: I'm not quite sure what's behind the old question about isolation.
Speaker 1: I don't want to be your textbook.
Speaker 21: You know, I got other things to do.
Speaker 4: So doctor Baltimore is one who discovered reverse transcript days
Speaker 4: and needs to think that retroviruses were the only things
Speaker 4: that reverse transcribed. It's actually how they got their name retrovirus,
Speaker 4: reverse transcript days virus. And pretty soon they found out
Speaker 4: that reverse transcript days wasn't specific to retroviruses, and they were.
Speaker 1: How could it be? How could any of these mechanisms
Speaker 1: be associated with something that hasn't yet been proven to exist?
Speaker 1: So they just, like I said, they just pile on
Speaker 1: more bullshit on top of the old bullshit, a foundation
Speaker 1: of freaking sludge.
Speaker 4: Looking forward to anymore. Well, in the early eighties, they
Speaker 4: ignored that fact and they saw reverse transcript aise activities.
Speaker 4: And since they saw that, that's how they quote isolated HIV.
Speaker 4: But they never isolated because HIV is the only thing
Speaker 4: that reverse transcribes, and they knew that.
Speaker 1: They well, so something that happens naturally in your own
Speaker 1: body at all times that is not an indicator of anything.
Speaker 1: They a wile to test you positive for it and
Speaker 1: say that you have something. This is why I didn't
Speaker 1: test or whatever. We're going to allow myself to be
Speaker 1: tested for C nineteen because number one, they could just lie.
Speaker 1: Number two, whatever they're finding, they're not really finding. This
Speaker 1: is all part of the play. It's all part of
Speaker 1: the artificial, it's all part of the fiction. It's all
Speaker 1: you don't participate in the into fiction because their fiction
Speaker 1: has real life consequences. And when they're talking about, you know,
Speaker 1: quarantining you from your family, or they if they must
Speaker 1: take your family, take your children because they're protecting them,
Speaker 1: because that's what the government's all about. Yeah, this is
Speaker 1: the evil by a different, deceptive and indirect proxy method
Speaker 1: to destroy everything that is good in this world, in
Speaker 1: everything that you care about, and everything that good human
Speaker 1: beings care about, which is their family, get.
Speaker 6: Their tissue culture where this HIV is supposed to be growing.
Speaker 1: And I don't know if I told you that I
Speaker 1: had broken my wrist during like twenty twenty one, I
Speaker 1: was and they wanted me to swab and I said, no,
Speaker 1: I will go to a lab court right across the
Speaker 1: street from where you Actually you know that this hospital,
Speaker 1: I said, you work with them. I know you do,
Speaker 1: So I will do the A in a cup sample
Speaker 1: for you there since you don't do it here. But
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna let you touch me with anything that
Speaker 1: could potentially have something on it. And I don't even
Speaker 1: like the idea of doing this, but I will, I will,
Speaker 1: I will. What they say, what's that word make a concession?
Speaker 1: Not a concession? What's what's the word compromise here? Make
Speaker 1: a compromise here on this method of finding the same
Speaker 1: information that you think you're looking for. And they refused,
Speaker 1: and they canceled my surgery to reset bones on my
Speaker 1: wrist and thumb after after an accident and I broke
Speaker 1: my wrist just holding out the steering wheel. Just the
Speaker 1: impact broke my wrist. So they canceled my my my
Speaker 1: h surgery. It was a it was an urgent surgery.
Speaker 1: They said that I needed plates and pins and all
Speaker 1: this other crap, and the orthopedic doctor surgeon wanted to
Speaker 1: do it, but they called it off. And then they
Speaker 1: they they called me back and said that it was
Speaker 1: on again, and it was just another ploy to get
Speaker 1: me to do the same thing that I told him
Speaker 1: I wasn't going to do. So that came from the
Speaker 1: Then I had somebody of a board member, a board
Speaker 1: member called me from a block number, and that's what
Speaker 1: Liz Chapman, and she said, yeah, you're on for six
Speaker 1: am tomorrow morning or five thirty am tomorrow morning. You
Speaker 1: just have to do this. I go, how many times
Speaker 1: I have to explain this to you? I already I
Speaker 1: already told you I would be I would do it
Speaker 1: in this other manner, but you're not going to touch
Speaker 1: me or anything. And I showed up anyway for this
Speaker 1: for the surgery the second time, and they turned me
Speaker 1: away and said I wasn't on the schedule. So the stupid,
Speaker 1: you know, half cast splint thing that they had again
Speaker 1: had my thumb pushed down like this, and so when
Speaker 1: it healed, it healed all freaking screwed ups. And my
Speaker 1: thumb's not in the right place anymore as it is
Speaker 1: to this hand. And yeah, it ended up healing on
Speaker 1: its own without pins, plates and all this other shit,
Speaker 1: but the thumbs all screwed up like you can see
Speaker 1: how like the thumb is kind of like flat right
Speaker 1: here versus the way that the knuckle pops out there.
Speaker 1: That's that's never going to change anymore. That's how it was.
Speaker 1: That's how it went down. And I should have been
Speaker 1: able to sue. But in the world where they protect
Speaker 1: their own, you know, they don't owe me millions of
Speaker 1: dollars for that. And I went through the whole process
Speaker 1: of you know, notice of claim, notice of this, notice
Speaker 1: of you know all stuff that I had it all
Speaker 1: sent to them via registered mail with the little green
Speaker 1: cars that you get back from it. I did all
Speaker 1: that to let them know that I wasn't I wasn't
Speaker 1: messing around. But there's you can't only go so far
Speaker 1: in this system because the system itself is preserving of itself.
Speaker 1: So where justice should have heard, it didn't and it won't.
Speaker 1: And this is firsthand experience. I stood in my ground
Speaker 1: when I had a broken arm, and most people would
Speaker 1: have caved and said fine, I wouldn't let I wouldn't
Speaker 1: participate in that, in that fraud, and I wouldn't bring
Speaker 1: myself into that fraud or into that artificial world with
Speaker 1: them to be dealt with as they pleased it wasn't
Speaker 1: gonna happen.
Speaker 6: Look it for reverse transcript tasee, which is an enzyme
Speaker 6: that was supposed to be specific or only exclusively found
Speaker 6: in reptroviruses. And if they find reverse transcript taste in
Speaker 6: the tissue culture, they say, Aha, we have now isolated HIV.
Speaker 20: What's so special reverse transcription?
Speaker 1: It's parlor tricks, guys, parlor tricks and every single V
Speaker 1: word is the same. It's all fraud. But they have
Speaker 1: real poisonous shots. Those are real with real consequences to
Speaker 1: fix a problem that's not the cause or even potentially
Speaker 1: even existing in the first place. And this is something
Speaker 1: that was known in past year's time. This is something
Speaker 1: that was known in by Bea Schamp who brought this
Speaker 1: all out. And this is why by Shamp or Pasture
Speaker 1: is a book everybody should read. And read Virus Mania,
Speaker 1: and then read doctor Glennin's most recent book, and then
Speaker 1: or alongside that, get the eleftaff Body System book by
Speaker 1: doctor Manzo. There's a code you can look at my
Speaker 1: website for that you get fifteen percent off.
Speaker 22: Anytime you're searching for a new agent, you want to
Speaker 22: have some simple measurement of the presence of that agent.
Speaker 22: In times past, you would put on cell culture in
Speaker 22: the laboratory and suddenly these beautiful cells will all start
Speaker 22: turning into dead cells. You say, oh, something's there, and
Speaker 22: then you put that gay.
Speaker 1: It could have been the poisons that you ejected into
Speaker 1: the slivery of the sample or anything, right. Couldn't have
Speaker 1: been the things that actually cause cell death. It has
Speaker 1: to be because of some other thing that you are
Speaker 1: looking for that's not there. It couldn't be because of
Speaker 1: the process of poisoning the sample right right.
Speaker 22: To an electron microscope and look and you can find it.
Speaker 22: All those are rather difficult things to use. If there's
Speaker 22: something that the virus produces in this culture, you don't
Speaker 22: necessarily have to see all the dead stuff. You dis
Speaker 22: can have take off some of the liquid it's growing
Speaker 22: in and test it. And one thing you can test
Speaker 22: for a retrovirus is reverse transcript taste, and it just
Speaker 22: happens to be that's a laboratory test available for it.
Speaker 22: So you just take a little bit off, put it
Speaker 22: into a chemical assay, and you can do it very,
Speaker 22: very simply. So it's a matter of something that you
Speaker 22: can put a lot of specimens.
Speaker 1: Oh, by the way, for all of the nonsense that
Speaker 1: and you know, there was also really good things that
Speaker 1: Andrew Kaufman said in the very beginning of the whole
Speaker 1: c nineteen era. He is a psychiatrist by profession, and
Speaker 1: those guys and they're drugs. He used to develop and
Speaker 1: test drugs. Andrew Kaufman, he's got his. He's still wrapped
Speaker 1: up in the same type of system. And psychiatry is
Speaker 1: one of the most ridiculous pseudosciences out there.
Speaker 22: And something that's simple to do. So what you can
Speaker 22: really get a maybe not a direct picture of the virus,
Speaker 22: you can't see it, but you can get evidence that
Speaker 22: it is there, like fingerprints.
Speaker 1: So that's what they call confirmation bias. We look, we
Speaker 1: were looking for some thing. Therefore it was found, regardless
Speaker 1: if we can actually find it or not.
Speaker 6: Transcript taste can be found in any number of different places.
Speaker 6: Normal cells contain reverse transcriptase, and under certain conditions they
Speaker 6: will reverse transcribe RNA into DNA.
Speaker 10: We know what is reverse transcription.
Speaker 1: That's doctor Stefan Laca right there, great man, great man.
Speaker 9: That's the repair of mechanism of the ends of the chromosomes. Yeah,
Speaker 9: and therefore we have high activity in cancer cells or
Speaker 9: Montaignier embryonic cells. But Montani never said that he found
Speaker 9: the vowels of AIDS. He said this could be probably
Speaker 9: an effect and to be carefully studied.
Speaker 6: The cells of people with leukemia have also been shown
Speaker 6: to have reverse transcriptase activity, and why this is important
Speaker 6: is that every HIV culture starting with Robert Gallo were
Speaker 6: co cultured with leukemia tissue.
Speaker 1: So they'd put something in there that they knew had
Speaker 1: reverse transcriptase high potential in it so that they could say, aha,
Speaker 1: you have HIV. You don't think they did it deliberately,
Speaker 1: just take.
Speaker 6: The blood from somebody with AIDS and culture in the
Speaker 6: tissue culture all by itself. Because nothing would grow. They
Speaker 6: couldn't find any HIV that way, so they had to
Speaker 6: co culture it with cancer cells or tissue from people
Speaker 6: with leukemia.
Speaker 18: The only way to say that the existence of revested
Speaker 18: scriptase or the detection of revisted scriptase activity proves the
Speaker 18: retrovirus who was there is only if reversed transcription was
Speaker 18: specific to retroviruses, which is not the case in fact,
Speaker 18: then today nearly everybody accepts that reverst transcription or the
Speaker 18: Western scripts activity is non specific to retroviruses. In fact,
Speaker 18: at present everybody accepts that revers transcript transcription is present
Speaker 18: in all normal cells.
Speaker 15: A Western sypticity is the key zyme, which is that
Speaker 15: time was only associated.
Speaker 18: With Montagne put the Bruce cells in a culture into culture.
Speaker 18: He had a different growth factors, including PHA, and after
Speaker 18: fifteen days he detected revesteran scriptase activity.
Speaker 1: So chemicals that would cause cell death.
Speaker 18: Now, however, PHA by itself in normal cell and this
Speaker 18: was known by varasion, you see, the principal of and
Speaker 18: Gallop proved it at the beginning of the ninety seventi
Speaker 18: seventies that the PHA itself causes reverst transcription in normal cells.
Speaker 1: So they added PHA to a sample and then said, oh, look,
Speaker 1: revert transcriptase HIV once again, leukemia cells or leukemia substance
Speaker 1: from somebody who had cancer or leukemia and chemicals that
Speaker 1: cause the exact same thing to occur mixed in with it.
Speaker 1: But it's the virus, you see. How can you have
Speaker 1: so many causative agents together and then single out one
Speaker 1: thing that isn't there and say it's from that rather
Speaker 1: than any of the other things that you knowingly put
Speaker 1: in there that do that same thing. Don't take aptitude.
Speaker 1: Boys on boys.
Speaker 18: Put something in the cell which was causy of a subscription.
Speaker 18: And yet you said that this proves the existence of
Speaker 18: offer a provirus there.
Speaker 20: So you're saying that what they found might just be
Speaker 20: the actual substance they put in the.
Speaker 1: Culture and not a virus.
Speaker 18: Definitely.
Speaker 20: But in all my interviews with scientists, they all say
Speaker 20: that reverse transcription is unique to retrovirus and that's how
Speaker 20: they knew that there was a virus in their culture.
Speaker 18: If you don't believe me, going as Baltimore or Varmus,
Speaker 18: and I'm sure they will confirm that rivestroscript is activity
Speaker 18: is a characteristic of retrovirusis, but it's not specific to them.
Speaker 1: What do you mean when you say reverse transit it's
Speaker 1: not a retrovirus, because how first you have to prove
Speaker 1: that that's a thing, and it's.
Speaker 20: A characteristic of retroviruses, but not specific.
Speaker 1: Oh, we can't start talking about unicorns until you find
Speaker 1: one isolated. Oh, there's unicorn antibodies. How do you know
Speaker 1: it's an antibody if you don't know what the structure
Speaker 1: of that unicorn was in the first place. How do
Speaker 1: you know it's an anti of that? Fucking idiots?
Speaker 18: Let me give you an example here is.
Speaker 1: And if you want to talk about in energetic ways,
Speaker 1: if you want to think of something like an antibody
Speaker 1: being even a real thing, because it potentially isn't, then
Speaker 1: it would if we kind of explained the whole thing
Speaker 1: of that would be what would be something more in
Speaker 1: line with how would they call it? Destructive interference? Where
Speaker 1: you have the opposite frequency impacting and neutralizing a frequency
Speaker 1: rightistic of humans?
Speaker 18: You know, black, white, or yellow. We all have hair,
Speaker 18: but it's not specific because there are many animals, for example, cats, dogs,
Speaker 18: which also have hair, and finding a hare in a room,
Speaker 18: it doesn't mean that a human being was there or
Speaker 18: a cat or a dog.
Speaker 23: Ritroviruses the only ones that can reverse transcribe.
Speaker 21: Ah h No, there are other forms of reverse transcription
Speaker 21: that are.
Speaker 1: Used in various.
Speaker 10: Various ways.
Speaker 4: Inside the cell.
Speaker 21: For instance, the ends of chromosomes are made by a
Speaker 21: reverse transcription process.
Speaker 10: That's how they're.
Speaker 21: Maintained stable them. There is reverse transcription in the inheritance
Speaker 21: of all of our cells, which comes about from indigenous
Speaker 21: genetic elements in the cells or in the cells of
Speaker 21: our ancestors, because once that information gets into our into
Speaker 21: our cells, into our genomes, it stays there forever. So
Speaker 21: it could be that we've inherited information from monkeys or
Speaker 21: from other animals that are that are in our lineage.
Speaker 1: Yeah that again. No, No, we're bringing in the bogus
Speaker 1: claims evolution. Okay, another observational error. Oh, we're ninety nine
Speaker 1: or ninety eight percent just like monkeys. Yeah, well, it's
Speaker 1: a two percent of difference that makes all the difference.
Speaker 1: Anything that with symmetrical features arms, legs, eyes is going
Speaker 1: to have probably a similar uh composition when it comes
Speaker 1: to certain elements that make it up. But it's the
Speaker 1: it's the little differences that make all the difference. Is
Speaker 1: when did we get a a nose that protruded rather
Speaker 1: than one that was squashed to our face like a
Speaker 1: like a monkey, except for that one proboscus monkey that's
Speaker 1: way big. A lot of the things. This shit is
Speaker 1: just fucking juvenile when when you just look at it
Speaker 1: from like a child would look at this and say,
Speaker 1: these people are weird, you know.
Speaker 21: And so no, reverse transcription is actually very widespread. Something
Speaker 21: like fifty percent of the DNA and ourselves comes about
Speaker 21: by reverse transcription.
Speaker 10: The problem is that they detected nonp.
Speaker 1: Because even children, they can't just be told something. They
Speaker 1: want to make it make sense with the They say
Speaker 1: why a lot? Why? How So you try to teach
Speaker 1: evolution to a child who's who's not in the the
Speaker 1: pressure of a school environment, and they'll look at you
Speaker 1: very confused and say, why, how, how did that happen?
Speaker 10: Didn't they detected non specific phenomenon previous transcription particles, and
Speaker 10: we're saying all the problems with particles.
Speaker 1: I think this is funny in The Emperor's New Virus
Speaker 1: because doctor Glennon's first book was The The MD Emperor's
Speaker 1: New Clothes, and Uh, nobody got it. Nobody understood I
Speaker 1: guess what the what that meant.
Speaker 4: That they.
Speaker 1: They don't have anything, They've got nothing, But everybody wants
Speaker 1: to feel smart, and the sure as hell don't want
Speaker 1: to sound like they are unworthy of seeing these clothes.
Speaker 1: So therefore it's reality by consensus because nobody's gonna their
Speaker 1: ego want to allow them, or their their reputation will
Speaker 1: allow them to challenge the very absurdity of it all.
Speaker 10: And and agen anybody reactions. And so you can't take
Speaker 10: a whole lot of things that might be something and
Speaker 10: turn them into that something. That's the problem. I mean,
Speaker 10: if you're walking down the if you walk into an
Speaker 10: empty space and you find an engine block and a
Speaker 10: van belt and a generator lying on the ground, what
Speaker 10: do you say you've got? You know what you've got?
Speaker 10: I mean, is that a car? It could have been
Speaker 10: a boat. Could it be a plane. It could have
Speaker 10: been something someone uses on a farm to lift grain up.
Speaker 10: It could be all those things. You can't you can't
Speaker 10: make something specific out of all lot of things that
Speaker 10: are non specific. So they didn't. They used a lot
Speaker 10: of non specific and just preferred to believe that this
Speaker 10: is what they'd found.
Speaker 20: For what was the purpose of the purification?
Speaker 14: Then, well, to make sure.
Speaker 1: You have as remember he got a normal laureate for
Speaker 1: discovery of a unicorn. He discovered unicorses everybody you.
Speaker 4: Know, so he'll admit that. But then about ten years
Speaker 4: earlier he admitted they never did it.
Speaker 24: In October nineteen ninety seven, Continue and published an interview
Speaker 24: with Professor Luke Montaignier, who first claimed to have discovered HIV.
Speaker 24: His team had not been able to purify HIV.
Speaker 1: Well, of course we looked for it. We saw some particles,
Speaker 1: but they didn't have the morphology of retroviruses. He later said,
Speaker 1: I repeat, we did not purify.
Speaker 23: It was startling that Professor Montagne decided to acknowledge in
Speaker 23: his interview with Jamelle Taheen continue that as far back
Speaker 23: as nineteen eighty three his team were not able to
Speaker 23: purify anything that you might call HIV, despite what he
Speaker 23: termed a Roman effort.
Speaker 4: So even though Martinier admitted that they never purified, Dauci
Speaker 4: took that to be proof.
Speaker 15: In two thousand and nine, documentarian Brent Leung persuaded doctor
Speaker 15: Fauci to submit to a sit down interview for Leung's
Speaker 15: feature length film on the history of AIDS House of Numbers,
Speaker 15: Anatomy of an Epidemic. Leung asked an uncomfortable, chafing doctor
Speaker 15: Fauci for his best evidence linking HIV to immune deficiency disease.
Speaker 15: With two decades and ten billion dollars to prepare his answer,
Speaker 15: doctor Fauci's best explanation was the classic Fauci soft shoe.
Speaker 15: Contemporary Americans will recognize the familiar refrain of double talking
Speaker 15: and dissembling that we all now recognize from the NIAID
Speaker 15: director's COVID nineteen interviews.
Speaker 25: He said, when you put the combined findings of the
Speaker 25: initial characterization.
Speaker 1: As the suggestment by the way extinct.
Speaker 25: Retrovirus isolated by Montaigne and his group, together with Gallo
Speaker 25: linking the virus to being the cause of AIDS, and
Speaker 25: he put those things together, and that's how we have
Speaker 25: a confirmation of the causative agent of AIDS, namely HIV.
Speaker 15: Translating all that into regular English, which Charles ortleb remarked
Speaker 15: to me with a laugh, takes just three words. Gallo says,
Speaker 15: So that's what Fauci calls a confirmation.
Speaker 21: When I said fifty percent, I'm saying fifty percent of
Speaker 21: the DNA came about by her first transcription. But it's
Speaker 21: not all retroviruses. Lots of it is just repeated elements
Speaker 21: that are there as what we generally consider it to
Speaker 21: be parasitic DNA DNA, which is other people call it
Speaker 21: selfish DNA DNA, which is in there because it's able
Speaker 21: to copy itself and reintegrate itself in other places. And
Speaker 21: this is something that's going.
Speaker 4: On all the time. Anyway, this is a very complicated subject.
Speaker 4: It's not really. They make it complicated so we get confused.
Speaker 4: But I'd recommend to watching all the documentaries that I used.
Speaker 4: I'll leave links to them all below. And this barely
Speaker 4: scratches the surface.
Speaker 20: Why do you do you think they used reverse transcription
Speaker 20: to prove the existence of a virus if they knew
Speaker 20: that it wasn't specific to viruses.
Speaker 18: I don't know. It's as simple as this.
Speaker 1: I don't know, right, because as long as enough people
Speaker 1: and colleagues, you know, contemporaries agree that this is the
Speaker 1: fraud that we're going to run with everyone benefit, it's
Speaker 1: who's involved, and that's the real answer. H let's know
Speaker 1: what this going about. Yeah, that's that's for a whole
Speaker 1: other day. And that's a longer one. So I think
Speaker 1: that's it. Let me go to.
Speaker 15: Here.
Speaker 1: That's something one that one. If the video freezes every
Speaker 1: thirty seconds, that's not on my end, that's okay. So
Speaker 1: if it is a rumble thing, if it's a rumble issue,
Speaker 1: it's only at nineteen eighty nineteen eighty ten eighty p
Speaker 1: at sixty frames per second. So either they have an
Speaker 1: overload in their system, or's something else going on. I'm
Speaker 1: not you're asking me to fix something. It could be
Speaker 1: your device, it could be whatever you're looking at not
Speaker 1: being able to handle it to you. So there you go. No,
Speaker 1: I can't do that.
Speaker 3: It's not on my end.
Speaker 1: So go to here. Now that I said, you have
Speaker 1: to go to my site for the direct link to
Speaker 1: doctor Manzos formulated Azure well Whole Food Supplements. Use code
Speaker 1: b B five for a discount. Now then it shows
Speaker 1: this and all that stuff, and this is the Patreon
Speaker 1: and I don't know, well why it still continues to
Speaker 1: do this. I'm hitting the enter button and it's still
Speaker 1: putting on the same line. That's irritating as elder me. Okay,
Speaker 1: click this right here? Why may I am seeing the
Speaker 1: right man? Okay? Good, good, good, Doctor Peter Glidden. Link
Speaker 1: to his website is right here. Highlight and copy this
Speaker 1: here for the fifty percent off his membership, right click it,
Speaker 1: Gheit copy click this link and boom, there's this book.
Speaker 1: As a member. You'll get twenty percent off the physical copies.
Speaker 1: And he has an introduction video right here, and that
Speaker 1: was his most recent worldwide free event. You go into
Speaker 1: something that looks like this, you join new membership, you
Speaker 1: plug in that or to paste that ball Busters no caps,
Speaker 1: no spaces, and you will get fifty percent off his
Speaker 1: either monthly or his annual membership. You save more with
Speaker 1: the annual. Okay, now, Doctor Monzo's book, you don't need
Speaker 1: this link here anymore. It's already incorporated in the clicking
Speaker 1: of the link. So when you click this link, you'll
Speaker 1: see the book right on front. You click that I
Speaker 1: spralled down that is right here. So if you want
Speaker 1: the binder book, which is the practitioner's copy, the one
Speaker 1: that I have, it's right there, the international one here,
Speaker 1: and then the Healing Made Simple Condensed Version E book,
Speaker 1: either of these top or bottom, you'll get a discount.
Speaker 1: When you go to the checkout, it'll already show it
Speaker 1: in there. Okay, okay, what we're gonna look at right
Speaker 1: now is Azure.
Speaker 14: Well.
Speaker 1: These are all whole food with vitamin supplements that help
Speaker 1: getch you the ninety essential nutrients. The code right here
Speaker 1: is underneath the little icon, the little image. It says
Speaker 1: b B five, Bravo Bravo five. Same thing. Right click
Speaker 1: copy this when you don't need to use it.
Speaker 18: This.
Speaker 1: When you do this isn't off of doctor manzos site.
Speaker 1: This is off Azure Well site designed by doctor Alphonso Manzo.
Speaker 1: The third you click it, the Alaskanky liver oil would
Speaker 1: be like the e FA plus that you would find
Speaker 1: at lifelhealth dot com. The whole Food multi vitamin can
Speaker 1: be used as a Sometimes you don't have a whole
Speaker 1: lot of disposable income each month, and sometimes maybe the
Speaker 1: tangy tangerine at double that price might be a little
Speaker 1: bit high for you. Well, here's a half off solution
Speaker 1: for that, and it will get you what you need.
Speaker 1: The whole food multi vitamin right here, and again that
Speaker 1: price will be discounted when you use code BB five.
Speaker 1: And why did I say up till hundred and thirteen?
Speaker 1: Because I have three packs. You can get one pack,
Speaker 1: you can get three packs, okay, full of achemic blend. Now,
Speaker 1: I personally will always take the plant derived mineral liquid
Speaker 1: from eifelhealth dot com. But in addition to that fuvichemic acid.
Speaker 1: This one lasts for three months, So you take that,
Speaker 1: and that's not a monthly fee or monthly cost for
Speaker 1: this stuff. You divide that by three to see what
Speaker 1: your multi cost is fifty eighty three divided by three.
Speaker 1: It's actually probably more than ninety days supply. And this
Speaker 1: is something that you make with like four ounces of water,
Speaker 1: turns the water black because it's rich full vicubic acid.
Speaker 1: With all the ionic minerals that you want, and that
Speaker 1: plus plant derived minerals, you'll be in really good shape,
Speaker 1: really good shape. Now let's go down. The whole food
Speaker 1: vitamin C complex has copper in it because that's how
Speaker 1: it's naturally found. There's a bond with a copper, so
Speaker 1: that is right here. You can add that if you
Speaker 1: so desire. The core copper is right here. This is
Speaker 1: one I don't think you should pass on. And again,
Speaker 1: when you use Bravo Bravo five, you're gonna get that's
Speaker 1: gonna be less. And again, why does it say seventy two, Well,
Speaker 1: because you can get three of them, or you can
Speaker 1: get one. And if you keep continuing to scroll down
Speaker 1: here you're gonna find the IP six. Now this will
Speaker 1: help remove excessive iron that's been stored in your tissues,
Speaker 1: causing joint pain, causing fatigue. This stuff right here. There's
Speaker 1: an awful lot of literature you can find on IP
Speaker 1: six that also has a lot of magnesium and calcium
Speaker 1: in it. And even though that's the case, I still
Speaker 1: would always get the beyond a CIOFX from lifelhealth dot Com.
Speaker 1: I go through more than three bottles in a quick
Speaker 1: period of time at this house with two people taking it.
Speaker 1: So I take the OCOFX, and I would take the
Speaker 1: IP six myself personally, all right. The most absorbable form
Speaker 1: of calcium magnesium sulflement that is the one that doctor
Speaker 1: Blyton talks about with the osteo effects. So especially if
Speaker 1: you're in a deficiency issue, when you're taking fistfuls of
Speaker 1: calcium pills that are huge and you're only getting eight
Speaker 1: percent absorption and spending an awful lot of money on it,
Speaker 1: the idea of manking that not happened anymore would be
Speaker 1: probably a wise one, and you would go with the
Speaker 1: beyond austeo effects. This would be more for getting rid of.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of things the IP six does. Resource
Speaker 1: of calcium magnesium phosphorus supports healthy immune cell activity made
Speaker 1: from the highest quality non GMO rice brand in Japan
Speaker 1: contains no fillers let's see supports that natural killer cell activity.
Speaker 1: A resource of calcium in set made from the high
Speaker 1: let's see. But in addition, it gets rid of the
Speaker 1: the over the overflow of excessive iron. If you are
Speaker 1: eating cereal getting red toot iron, that stuff is terrible
Speaker 1: for you. And that has a little breakdown here for
Speaker 1: you too, between scoop and capsule. This one is the powder.
Speaker 1: I say that. It says somewhere, yeah, powder right there,
Speaker 1: all right, So again use bravo Bravo five BB five
Speaker 1: for that. And this is all things you can get
Speaker 1: from my website. Right for my website, you can click
Speaker 1: any of those things. It's simper fry s E m
Speaker 1: p E r s E m p E r s
Speaker 1: E m p E r fry f r y l
Speaker 1: l C dot com. And beneath that you can find
Speaker 1: my book with creating and all my hot sauces, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, thank you to everyone who has placed orders.
Speaker 1: I've got a lot to do today and for the
Speaker 1: next few days. I've got a wholesale order that's going
Speaker 1: to San Diego. I've got another one hundred bottle order
Speaker 1: that came in, and I've got a store of a
Speaker 1: friend of mine to fill as well. That's a new thing.
Speaker 1: And the internet orders that I received are almost ninety
Speaker 1: nine percent. Well, got like four more to make and
Speaker 1: I'm not taking to four miles, four different types, and
Speaker 1: that'll won't take long at all, and then they'll they'll
Speaker 1: be wrapped up and shipped out. Okay, some of them
Speaker 1: already have been sent out. The rest are just missing
Speaker 1: one little thing you each to complete them, and I'm
Speaker 1: getting that done today. All right, Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for your time. Remember one stop shop here is the
Speaker 1: code for ten percent off of my stuff on my website,
Speaker 1: and that's what these are bundle packs here. Don't use
Speaker 1: the code on those because it's already free shipping. And
Speaker 1: if you're out of country, expect there to be additional
Speaker 1: shipping because this is for domestic. Shipping to outside of
Speaker 1: the US is extremely expensive and it would not make
Speaker 1: sense for us the do no shipping because I would
Speaker 1: just be paying you to take my stuff. Okay, and
Speaker 1: there you go. Oh and I have to I have
Speaker 1: to announce this too. Thank god, I've remembered. It's back.
Speaker 1: It is back now. Some of the display ones used
Speaker 1: to have this nice design on here. That was prior
Speaker 1: to us having children and things that we had to
Speaker 1: get done. So Rebecca, more time to do craft work
Speaker 1: on these bottles. You get the bottle minus the flower.
Speaker 1: That's you know, minus this charm and minus this mond,
Speaker 1: the bottle of the honey, and you scroll down you
Speaker 1: make sure you get the right one. It's the one
Speaker 1: six ounce bottle by volume. You click that one. All right,
Speaker 1: it's spicy honey. It's ghost pepper, hence the name Haunted
Speaker 1: honey and rugas scorpion pepper and dalmatian stage. And this
Speaker 1: is one of the most request I saw it after
Speaker 1: and praised items outside of the hot sauce. And like
Speaker 1: I said, many times before, people came from all over
Speaker 1: the world to San Diego and when they had this honey,
Speaker 1: they came back specifically to stock up on this on
Speaker 1: their trips, you know. And I'm assuming that's because of
Speaker 1: shipping being what it is. You get as much as
Speaker 1: you can while you're there and then just check a
Speaker 1: bag and it's probably cheaper. So there you go. All right,
Speaker 1: that is the Haunted honey.
Speaker 15: This thing is.
Speaker 1: I've put it in coffee. I put it in in
Speaker 1: uh orange peico or black tea. I haven't tried it
Speaker 1: in green tea because I usually do green chea with
Speaker 1: jasmine I just wasn't sure how that would you know,
Speaker 1: how that would mix. Green Tea's got a little bit
Speaker 1: more of a bitterness to it, but the but regular tea,
Speaker 1: it's amazing. And I use it on steak, I use
Speaker 1: it on chicken. I've justled it over salads that I've
Speaker 1: used an additional with there's it's just freaking delicious, absolutely delicious.
Speaker 1: Rebecca does a phenomenal job making this. All right, there
Speaker 1: you go, and yeah, there's a there's a Patreon. If
Speaker 1: you want to be on the on the on the
Speaker 1: on the cool Kids team, you're welcome to do that
Speaker 1: as well. Yeah, alrighty, all right, that's it centerfrillc dot com. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I use the right hand this time until next time,
Speaker 1: which might be well since I've got a lot, a
Speaker 1: lot to do with the hot sauce making. But it
Speaker 1: will happen. You'll see me again eventually, and let's see
Speaker 1: Oh you, oh Mike, jeez, you ordered some the other
Speaker 1: day and you forgot you forgot? Yeah, man, I get it.
Speaker 19: I get it.
Speaker 1: Does this show up on my ALM? No it doesn't.
Speaker 1: I never even know if it's up or not. That's interesting.
Speaker 1: That's kind of issue that they have there. That's not
Speaker 1: the right one. I was trying to click.
Speaker 15: What happened?
Speaker 1: That's the one right there? All right, and that should
Speaker 1: be a little just I can't take the delays every
Speaker 1: three seconds. I'm out. Okay, Well that's your problem. It's
Speaker 1: not something that's on my side. You having a temperature
Speaker 1: and trim over something I already told you isn't on
Speaker 1: my end alright, anyway, I'm out. Yeah, okay, Well, you know,
Speaker 1: address your own shit, or your internet connection or your
Speaker 1: whatever the hell it is. Yeah, it's all good man.
Speaker 1: Just you know, tell doctor Manto. Maybe he'll do something
Speaker 1: about it alright later. Oh I don't think you can't,
Speaker 1: because it's through the other site that he's not running.
Speaker 1: Never mind. I we're out ending stream now. By if
Speaker 1: I get any of this right today, stand by