Speaker 1: Okay, we are alive. Hi, this is William Ramsey. Welcome
Speaker 1: to William Ramsey Investigates on today's show. Have a very
Speaker 1: very special guest. His name is doctor Jerome Corsi, last
Speaker 1: name spelled Corsi. I've been a follower and listener of
Speaker 1: his for many years, and most recently I listened to
Speaker 1: his book on It was about the GfK assassination, which
Speaker 1: came out in twenty twenty four. And he's the author
Speaker 1: of thirty books, so many many books on a variety
Speaker 1: of different subjects. But today I got something in the
Speaker 1: mail about some of the articles he's been working on
Speaker 1: and writing on, and it's about this encrypted algorithm exposing
Speaker 1: election integrity, vulnerabilities of advanced cryptography in voter roles and
Speaker 1: things are going on. I've noticed this in the past.
Speaker 1: We were talking in the pre show about strange things
Speaker 1: that happened in Brazil and he told me about the
Speaker 1: same thing happened in Venezuela. And so these are very
Speaker 1: important issues coming up to this elect Is there something
Speaker 1: back in this in the back of a lot of
Speaker 1: these but voting machines And you can find his stuff
Speaker 1: on Amazon. Also, his website is the Truth Central. You'll
Speaker 1: see that right here. But also he started a five
Speaker 1: on one C three and it's called God's five Stones,
Speaker 1: and you'll see the website here, godsfivestones dot com and
Speaker 1: its mission statement is to kind of look into these subjects.
Speaker 1: And he's quoted from Archbeuership Carlo Vagano. People might see
Speaker 1: that he's often on social media, but you all put
Speaker 1: links to all of these websites into his books on
Speaker 1: this show. But I'm delighted to have them, so doctor Jerome,
Speaker 1: of course, he welcome to the show.
Speaker 2: Wayne, great to be with you.
Speaker 1: Thank you awesome. So for people may not have heard
Speaker 1: you like I've listened to you on so many different
Speaker 1: other programs. Maybe you can talk a little bit about
Speaker 1: your background, all of your books, and then what led
Speaker 1: up to your interest in looking at to this kind
Speaker 1: of algorithmic mystery.
Speaker 2: Well, I've had a varied career. I have a PhD
Speaker 2: from Harvard and political science that I got in nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy two. I spent time in universities. I have had
Speaker 2: multiple careers in financial services. I became an expert in terrorism.
Speaker 2: I did a lot of work with figuring out computer
Speaker 2: programs to predict the outcome of terrorist events. I had
Speaker 2: top secret clearance and worked with the State Department on
Speaker 2: hostage survival and other issues. At any rate. Eventually two
Speaker 2: thousand and four I co authored with John O'Neil Unfit
Speaker 2: for Command, which was the Swiftboat book Swiptball Veterans speak
Speaker 2: Out against John Kerry, And that began my career in
Speaker 2: writing books on politics and economics and also becoming a
Speaker 2: political commentator. And now my podcast is the Truthcentral dot com.
Speaker 2: And the current subject I want to talk about today
Speaker 2: because we're right on the edge of the election, is
Speaker 2: these algorithms, which is the five oh one C three
Speaker 2: you refer to, which is God's gods. There's no apostrophe
Speaker 2: and you spell out five five st O n E
Speaker 2: s plural godsfivestones dot com and this website is documenting
Speaker 2: algorithms which are secret codes like cryptography, same as you
Speaker 2: would do if you want to transmit a military message
Speaker 2: and you didn't want the other side to know what
Speaker 2: you were telling your troops to do. So the algorithms
Speaker 2: that are in the State Board of Election voter registration databases.
Speaker 2: These are algorithms that are built into the actual databases
Speaker 2: that we're going to use to vote allow for the
Speaker 2: criminals who created these algorithms. And by the way, they
Speaker 2: have to be placed inside the computer on which the
Speaker 2: state voter registration roles are running. So someone had to
Speaker 2: have penetrated those computers and embedded a code, which is
Speaker 2: of course completely illegal, and that code allows for false
Speaker 2: voters to be created. It's kind of like a marked
Speaker 2: card scheme. The false voters, the records are created and
Speaker 2: then hidden in the deck so you can't find them
Speaker 2: very easily. They look like normal cards, they look like
Speaker 2: normal voter roles, but when the criminals want to vote them,
Speaker 2: they've gotten state IDs that are legitimate. That's the key
Speaker 2: part of the scheme is that even though these voters
Speaker 2: are created as false voters, they end up with a
Speaker 2: legitimate state ID, which means they can cast a vote
Speaker 2: that will be counted and certified. And that's what the
Speaker 2: Democratic leftist wanted to do. They want to find fictional
Speaker 2: voters because they don't have enough voters to win ELEC legitimately,
Speaker 2: and then they want to create them so that they
Speaker 2: can cheat with voter fraud. They want to do it
Speaker 2: in a way that's so clever. You can't detect it,
Speaker 2: and their main scheme is to use the mail in ballots.
Speaker 2: We've found these. Now, if you take the drop down
Speaker 2: the states and take a look at the number of
Speaker 2: states we've found them in Georgia, and there's a tab
Speaker 2: at the top. These are very complicated schemes. I'll explain
Speaker 2: them in a minute. But the first tab of the
Speaker 2: left where it says state you have drops that you
Speaker 2: see how many states we have. We've we've found these
Speaker 2: algorithms in a variety.
Speaker 1: Including I'm just.
Speaker 2: Going to get it up in myself here and read
Speaker 2: the list right off to you. Hold on, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: put it on my computer.
Speaker 1: I can help Georgia, Arizona, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: in Wisconsin. So far as what I see.
Speaker 2: Yes, and that includes four of the battleground states, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin,
Speaker 2: and Arizona and Georgia. Those four battleground states we found
Speaker 2: the algorithm in, and I can explain how the algorithm works.
Speaker 2: And also the Georgia paper helps me to show you
Speaker 2: how it can switch votes, as we've actually now caught
Speaker 2: Georgia's switching votes in the early voting. And if I'm
Speaker 2: gonna pull up a paper which is Piquette's paper. Andrew
Speaker 2: Piquette is the computer genius who figured this out. He
Speaker 2: was working with the New York State group that was
Speaker 2: looking at voter integrity and he realized Andrew Riquette is
Speaker 2: a computer genius. He's his specialty is computer graphics.
Speaker 1: He has a.
Speaker 2: PhD from the London School in London on computer graphics
Speaker 2: and he was able to recognize patterns brilliantly. That's I
Speaker 2: think his real genius. And the schemes are complicated. Uh,
Speaker 2: if you if I can square share my screen or
Speaker 2: I can give you the link here and you can
Speaker 2: share your screen, whichever you prefer.
Speaker 1: But the link is fine. I mean, is it on
Speaker 1: your website?
Speaker 2: Yes, it's on my website. It's Andrew Piquettes though, the
Speaker 2: very first Andrew Piquette. If we say, let's see the
Speaker 2: one on New York, I want the one from New.
Speaker 1: York les preliminary voter rules reports slideshow one or two.
Speaker 2: I want the paper, the Andrew Piquette paper.
Speaker 1: There you go. Okay, so is the Caesar cipher and
Speaker 1: stacking the deck in New York State voter rules? Right?
Speaker 2: And that's what it's about. Now, what they do is
Speaker 2: that they all of these algorithms share some common features.
Speaker 2: First is that the state does not utilize the voter
Speaker 2: date of registration to order the records. Okay, we'll see
Speaker 2: go to page ninety five and this is page ninety
Speaker 2: five of this paper because it was published in a journal,
Speaker 2: and this is how it was published in a journal,
Speaker 2: and what the state. The normal way if you're going
Speaker 2: to run a legitimate voter registration role is if you
Speaker 2: come in early, you should get a low voter ID
Speaker 2: and register you know years ago, you have a lower
Speaker 2: voter ID number, your identification number. Then if you voted
Speaker 2: registered more recently, which you should have a higher voter
Speaker 2: ID number, and that should your number should give some
Speaker 2: indication of when you started voting in the state when
Speaker 2: you registered. But by not utilizing that, the criminals can
Speaker 2: order the data the way they want to order it,
Speaker 2: according to mathematical formulas. Now I'm going to compare this
Speaker 2: to a card marking scheme. If you get a deck
Speaker 2: of cards from the manufacturer, they come wrapped in cellophane usually,
Speaker 2: and then you open the box and the cards are
Speaker 2: ordered from the high card high suit to the low
Speaker 2: card low suit. So if you just stuck your mark
Speaker 2: cards into the deck, they would be obvious because they'd
Speaker 2: be the cards out of order, right, So the first
Speaker 2: thing you gotta do is you gotta shuffle the deck.
Speaker 2: And that's how these schemes start. So there's a middle
Speaker 2: column of this page ninety five. If you go to
Speaker 2: that and the middle column is maybe a little harder
Speaker 2: to see, you maybe can make it a little bit
Speaker 2: larger for people to be easier to see. If you can.
Speaker 2: I'll just narrate it.
Speaker 1: It's a CID ID.
Speaker 2: C ID is the county I D there, we go, yes,
Speaker 2: the county ID, and they get blurries to get too
Speaker 2: much enlargement. But you'll see over here these center numbers.
Speaker 2: You know, you've got three columns and left and three
Speaker 2: columns in the right. I'm talking about the four columns
Speaker 2: in the middle. What you do is you take the numbers.
Speaker 2: So for instance, if you say county number nine gets
Speaker 2: voter ID twenty million, three hundred eight and five oh seven,
Speaker 2: well you think the next one will be fiveh eight,
Speaker 2: But voter number ten in that county is twenty million,
Speaker 2: three hundred nine thousand and six one eight. In other words,
Speaker 2: they're adding one thousand and one hundred and eleven voters
Speaker 2: in between each of the voters in the county. Wow, okay,
Speaker 2: and those voters come from other counties and other places. Now,
Speaker 2: I'm going to tell you why they do that, and
Speaker 2: it's because you know everybody you know who has children.
Speaker 2: When you talk with your wife about your children, you say, well,
Speaker 2: for our first child, and everybody you and your wife
Speaker 2: know who you're talking about. You say, our third child
Speaker 2: was good in mathematics. Well, again, you don't have to
Speaker 2: name the third child. You know who the third child was.
Speaker 2: But when you go to the state, the state says, no,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry. Your first child is number one, but your
Speaker 2: second child is number twelve, and your third child is
Speaker 2: number twenty three. Then your fourth child is number thirty four,
Speaker 2: your fifth child is forty five, and the next child
Speaker 2: is fifty six. I don't have fifty six kids. I've
Speaker 2: got six kids. And they say, well, you know, our
Speaker 2: records show that these kids are all in your file.
Speaker 2: Now there is a kid number two through number eleven.
Speaker 2: They're just not your kids. And by the way, we
Speaker 2: made up kid three and Kid seven. So you do
Speaker 2: this because all these kids look alike you can't tell.
Speaker 2: They've got a name, they've got a birth date, they
Speaker 2: have an address. Even the ones you made up have
Speaker 2: a name, an ad birth date, and an address. And
Speaker 2: again it's a marked card. But since the cards all
Speaker 2: appear random, if you take a look at the date
Speaker 2: of registration in this center column, the date it's the
Speaker 2: registration are all over the board and all scattered. But
Speaker 2: if you look at the first three columns, which is
Speaker 2: a sort by the state Board of Education numbers, you
Speaker 2: can see that every state number is used. In other words,
Speaker 2: the eleven people who they sorted in between nine and
Speaker 2: ten came from somewhere and also had state IDs. Okay,
Speaker 2: But if you look at the last three columns, if
Speaker 2: that's a sorting by the registration date and now the
Speaker 2: county IDs, the state IDs are all out of order. Okay,
Speaker 2: So this is the first step. You've now successfully shuffled
Speaker 2: the deck and you've entered false cards into the deck.
Speaker 2: The false cards come from several sources. They can be
Speaker 2: what we call clones. In other words, they just take
Speaker 2: your record or somebody's record and make a duplicate. Now
Speaker 2: you've got two voters and they are at different places
Speaker 2: in the deck, so they don't look together, and so
Speaker 2: they each get a separate voter ID number, and in
Speaker 2: some cases there are voters that have as many as
Speaker 2: thirty separate IDs numbers.
Speaker 1: Wow wow Okay.
Speaker 2: And then they can also do inactive voters. In other words,
Speaker 2: if you haven't voted in five years or whatever period
Speaker 2: of time, you're supposed to be removed from the database. Well,
Speaker 2: they do that, but then they can put them back in.
Speaker 2: They can take purged records who are purged for one reason,
Speaker 2: maybe they moved, maybe they died, and they these purge
Speaker 2: records are put back into the database and given new
Speaker 2: numbers because nobody knows they were purged. They look like
Speaker 2: all the other records. In fact, at one time they
Speaker 2: were a legitimate record. And by using a purge record,
Speaker 2: they don't think that that voter is going to vote
Speaker 2: because the voter hasn't been voting, there's something wrong with
Speaker 2: that file. So they've got a file that is going
Speaker 2: to look legitimate because it was once legitimate, right and
Speaker 2: now sort of back into the data, you don't know
Speaker 2: that that vote came from the inactive file. Okay. So
Speaker 2: part of the scheme is the ability to create these
Speaker 2: voters and then to use them. Now, I'm going to
Speaker 2: show you a paper from Georgia. In fact, I've got
Speaker 2: it from you. It's the American Thinker paper, which was
Speaker 2: about the Georgia which we have found in Georgia the
Speaker 2: use of the algorithm to create fraudulent votes in early voting.
Speaker 2: And I think it's pretty interesting how we've done that.
Speaker 2: I'm going to kind of read a little bit of
Speaker 2: that to give you the background. Are you following me
Speaker 2: so far?
Speaker 1: Is this clear? I'm following you. So they've created duplicates, clones.
Speaker 1: Additional thing, they've scrambled the clear, clearly legible voter rolls,
Speaker 1: which should be new in American or numerical order, in
Speaker 1: order to insert these fake things. So somebody access or
Speaker 1: penetrated those records and scrambled them up, just like you
Speaker 1: said the dec of cards. So the analogy with the
Speaker 1: deck of cards that's got shuffled, that's right.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's a it's a very complicated scheme, and
Speaker 2: it had to have been done surreptitiously, because I don't
Speaker 2: think most of the perhaps no one are very few
Speaker 2: in the state Board of Election know that they're there.
Speaker 2: These algorithms and are used, and I think in Georgia
Speaker 2: it's more commonly known because I think Georgia is one
Speaker 2: of the states with more active voter fraud, and I'm
Speaker 2: sure that's going to become an issue again in a
Speaker 2: couple of days. But if we take a look at
Speaker 2: the article, what I say in this article is that
Speaker 2: we now have proof that the Georgia State Board of
Speaker 2: Elections creates illegal clone voter IDs in the thousands, capably
Speaker 2: being activated to create certifiable voters in an election fraud scheme,
Speaker 2: which is consistent with embedding cryptographer cryptographic codes the State
Speaker 2: Board of Election voter registration databases and on God's Five Stones.
Speaker 2: Andrew Piquett has discovered algorithms in New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona,
Speaker 2: now Georgia. We published the Georgia just Friday, and algorithms
Speaker 2: yet to be found in New Jersey, Texas and Hawaii.
Speaker 2: They have been found there, we just haven't published those
Speaker 2: reports yet. There's a group of Georgian named the Georgian Nerds.
Speaker 2: You can find them on x's the GA for Georgia
Speaker 2: Nerds an the RDS underscore Real ri e a L.
Speaker 2: They're headed by Kim Brooks. Now, what she has demonstrated
Speaker 2: is that these clone voter records with different state IDs
Speaker 2: are copied from an original, authentic of voter ID, and
Speaker 2: so the voter IDs that they're using involved deceased voters,
Speaker 2: voters who have moved from the state, voters who are inactive.
Speaker 2: The state ID numbers of the illegally cloned records are
Speaker 2: typically removed the Georgia State Board of Election voter registration
Speaker 2: database once the fraudu vote has been counted.
Speaker 1: Right, so they're cover up right away, So they get
Speaker 1: gets counted and then the cover up comes in.
Speaker 2: That's right, they removed. So the illegally cloned records appear
Speaker 2: legitimate until you search a variety of databases and you've
Speaker 2: got to search, for instance, the database of who voted,
Speaker 2: and then you've got to go and check the voter histories,
Speaker 2: which is supposed to be recorded in each voter database,
Speaker 2: and you've got to check the voter registration list to
Speaker 2: see if they're there. Okay, So what the Georgia derds
Speaker 2: have found is over three thousand absentee votes cast by
Speaker 2: voters who are not in the Georgia State Voard of
Speaker 2: Election voter registration database. Okay, Now, voting without being registered
Speaker 2: as a prima facio evidence of election fraud. And what
Speaker 2: the Georgia nerds found here is that the illegal three
Speaker 2: thousand absentee votes. They found them by comparing the state
Speaker 2: Board of Education absentee voter file with the voter history
Speaker 2: file and with the voter file. Okay, so this is
Speaker 2: a lot of files. These are three thousand votes that
Speaker 2: are illegal and should not have been taken, and yet
Speaker 2: they are removed from the database, so their voter registration
Speaker 2: number is no longer there. Okay, but yet the vote
Speaker 2: is counted. So these are clones that were used somehow
Speaker 2: or other, or or false records that were used, and
Speaker 2: many of them are shown that they were voted in person,
Speaker 2: but yet they didn't show up at the voting booth.
Speaker 2: They were somehow gained the entry, which can be done
Speaker 2: in the computer, so as they start gaming it in
Speaker 2: the computer, they don't actually have to show up. In fact,
Speaker 2: they probably don't mail mail in ballots to these people
Speaker 2: because of course there's nobody to mail them to, you know,
Speaker 2: if they've moved or whatever. So but when they want
Speaker 2: a mail in ballot and they pick a clone, They
Speaker 2: don't want to send two ballots to that person that
Speaker 2: would tipot off that person paid attention. But they when
Speaker 2: they want a second ballot with a separate ID number,
Speaker 2: they can say in the computer, we request a ballot
Speaker 2: for this person. Then that ballot can be printed and
Speaker 2: run through the machine and tabulated, and since the numbers
Speaker 2: match and they are legitimate state ID, it will count
Speaker 2: even though that voter is false.
Speaker 1: Follow me, yes, yes, So these are not ballots. These
Speaker 1: are fake voters that have already been done in this
Speaker 1: election twenty twenty four, they proved that three thousand r
Speaker 1: not clones. They're just fraudulent, just fraudulent.
Speaker 2: And we and they continue to find every day new
Speaker 2: fraudulent record. So you know, we you know, we have
Speaker 2: a for instance, next paragraph, I say, the Georgia Nerves
Speaker 2: found a case which in the Georgia Secretary of State
Speaker 2: had not removed duplicate files as required by the Help
Speaker 2: America Vote Act, which is two thousand and two federal legislation.
Speaker 2: But they were created purposefully only after the original voter
Speaker 2: idea was canceled and removed from the state border election
Speaker 2: voter registration. Okay, so for instance, what they do is
Speaker 2: they found someone from South Carolina that had a clone,
Speaker 2: and the clone voted, but they also found the original
Speaker 2: record in the the you know, the purged records, so
Speaker 2: they had a certain Purge records for the original record.
Speaker 2: They voted the clone, and then they took the clone
Speaker 2: out of the daily base, put the original record back,
Speaker 2: and they voted the original record. So and they could
Speaker 2: either then take the original record out or leave it
Speaker 2: in place. But the point was they got if they
Speaker 2: left it in place, it was because you know, it
Speaker 2: probably didn't come from the purge records. If it came
Speaker 2: from the Purge records, they'd probably put it back in
Speaker 2: the Purge records. Okay, wouldn't be in the voter database
Speaker 2: any longer if they left it, because it was, you know,
Speaker 2: one that was maybe a moved out of state as
Speaker 2: it was here. They didn't think the voter out of
Speaker 2: state was going to check to see if they were
Speaker 2: still in the Georgia State Board of Election voter role,
Speaker 2: So just leave it. But the point is, the clone
Speaker 2: voter showed up in the voter history file is having voted,
Speaker 2: and so therefore they and the voter showed up as
Speaker 2: having voted. So even though the voter is now in
Speaker 2: South Carolina, they believe, well, then that voter voted twice.
Speaker 2: Well it shouldn't voted at all, and the voter probably
Speaker 2: knows nothing about it.
Speaker 1: Right, right, So somebody's tinkering with the database. It's incredible.
Speaker 1: But they're showing that to the public or wherever the
Speaker 1: people help America Vote Act monitors that they're purging them
Speaker 1: and then they re put them back into the system
Speaker 1: as clones or something and then double vote. So that's
Speaker 1: what they found, that's like, and then they can cover
Speaker 1: it up after the election. They can just re cleanse
Speaker 1: the database and like precisely.
Speaker 2: And and so you've got to be what these people
Speaker 2: in Georgia did is they kind of brilliantly it's detective
Speaker 2: or because they figured out how to take one database,
Speaker 2: which is who's voted. So the states say, here are
Speaker 2: the people who voted, and then they start looking at
Speaker 2: the voter histories for those people and they see that,
Speaker 2: you know, those people did vote or didn't vote however
Speaker 2: whatever it's shown in you know, but at least they
Speaker 2: can they know, you know, the first of all, they
Speaker 2: they identify the voter. They look at the voter history.
Speaker 2: Then they're looking at the database. Now when the person
Speaker 2: shows that they voted, and you've got a record that
Speaker 2: they voted both in that they in the early voting record,
Speaker 2: it puts their name and their user ID, and then
Speaker 2: you look at that user name and that ID, and
Speaker 2: that voter record shows that that voter voted. It's got
Speaker 2: two confirmations they voted, but yet they're not in the
Speaker 2: active voter database. So they've been removed, okay. And here
Speaker 2: they found that there were fifty thousand records that were
Speaker 2: restored into the active database of inactive voters. A inactive voters,
Speaker 2: they were just put back into the database as if
Speaker 2: they were active. Okay. And so you know, Georgia law
Speaker 2: requires that the voters failed to vote and for whom
Speaker 2: there's been no contact in five years must be placed
Speaker 2: in the inactive voter list. Okay, A voter is removed
Speaker 2: for the inactive list if there's no contact in the
Speaker 2: subsequent two November general elections. That the law in Georgia
Speaker 2: requires that voter be gotten rid of that record is
Speaker 2: now just you know, it erased. But instead of erasing them,
Speaker 2: Georgia keeps them and then they put them back in
Speaker 2: the active voters when they need them. It's okay.
Speaker 1: So it's happening. So the election is being stolen as
Speaker 1: we as we sit here and watch. Supposedly tomorrow is
Speaker 1: the date. Yes, it's already being done. So this is
Speaker 1: just Georgia, right, swing state? How what was? How? What
Speaker 1: did Trump lose Georgia by?
Speaker 2: In very few votes? I mean the losses were in
Speaker 2: the range of ten than or twenty thousand. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, and the pattern of this, there are patterns
Speaker 2: to it. They're pretty apparent. You know. The voter that,
Speaker 2: like Kamala Harris, is not doing very well in the
Speaker 2: early voting, where usually the Democrats control the early voting.
Speaker 2: This year, the Republicans got out and said vote early also,
Speaker 2: so the voters are out there voting early. And that's
Speaker 2: showing the Democrats don't have much of a lead, if
Speaker 2: they have any. Okay, And so now what will happen
Speaker 2: is that if the Trump voters continue with strong turnout tomorrow,
Speaker 2: then what Georgia will start doing is voting more of
Speaker 2: the clones.
Speaker 1: Right, So they'll just respond in the database.
Speaker 2: Yeah, incredible, and there'll be a lag You'll say, you'll
Speaker 2: see that Kamala suddenly starts surging, she suddenly starts doing well. Okay,
Speaker 2: now if they get overwhelmed like they did in twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: they're going to have to stop the vote. And then
Speaker 2: in the morning they come in with a tenth thousand
Speaker 2: ballots or one hundred thousand ballots and they're ninety percent
Speaker 2: for Kamala. Now, one of the points is, since we've
Speaker 2: found these schemes and we know now how they do it,
Speaker 2: because he's not just enough to make up votes. You've
Speaker 2: got to make up votes that can be certifiable, right,
Speaker 2: so you have to get your false votes current state
Speaker 2: IDs that are legitimate.
Speaker 1: So somebody outside of the voting thing is getting IDs
Speaker 1: from that state government. Right. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I mean this could be done a couple different ways.
Speaker 2: I mean you could, first of all, let's say this
Speaker 2: is a CIA operation. Because these algorithms are very costly.
Speaker 2: They're very expensive, they're very difficult to implement. They require expertise.
Speaker 2: Because I showed you earlier you've got to use all
Speaker 2: the files even though you're doing this big scramble game. Well,
Speaker 2: just keeping that straight. It requires pretty sophisticated computer programming
Speaker 2: and it's an intricate operation. Then, so inserting the database
Speaker 2: is complicated, and then actually pulling off these frauds is
Speaker 2: complicated because you have to have access to the PERG file,
Speaker 2: you have to put it back in, you have to
Speaker 2: know where that is, and then you want to be
Speaker 2: able to remove that. You have to be able to
Speaker 2: vote some of them, and you got to know where
Speaker 2: they are because you want to remove them too. And
Speaker 2: if you're trying to double vote, you know, then you've
Speaker 2: got you've got active files that are in the role
Speaker 2: probably and you may leave them there, you've got to
Speaker 2: remove them, go to decide what you're going to do
Speaker 2: with them. So this could be done remotely, but whoever
Speaker 2: is doing this fraud has access to the state computer.
Speaker 1: Right which they're not supposed to write.
Speaker 2: That's no, I mean, that's completely illegal. And just as
Speaker 2: putting a code inside the database is completely illegal, this
Speaker 2: doesn't make it easier to use. It makes it more complicated.
Speaker 2: The only perpose of this code is to create false
Speaker 2: votes and devote them as certifiable votes. And so if
Speaker 2: you get a you know, I run a paragraph by
Speaker 2: saying Georgia in effect has two voter registration databases, one
Speaker 2: legal and the other illegal. But maintaining a double voter
Speaker 2: registration risks detention. So the system of cryptographic code algorithms
Speaker 2: has to be embedded in the state Board of Election
Speaker 2: computers to allow the criminals operating the illegal voting the
Speaker 2: ability to hide the illegally created votes until needed, and
Speaker 2: then retrieval of the hidden votes for you demands a
Speaker 2: cryptographic scheme of intelligence agency complexity because the algorithms that
Speaker 2: hiddenly illegal votes must be reversed to find them for use.
Speaker 2: When you send your code, you know, a commander sending
Speaker 2: an order to a military unit in the field, he's
Speaker 2: got to code that message and then when the unit
Speaker 2: receives it, so he's got to decode it. So I've
Speaker 2: got to be able to code it to hide my
Speaker 2: message by voter, my illegal voter, and then I've got
Speaker 2: to be able to reverse the code to find them
Speaker 2: and use them, and they use the code to put
Speaker 2: them back or I get rid of.
Speaker 1: It, then hide them again. Yeah, so bring them to
Speaker 1: the front, record them, then hide them again. So it's
Speaker 1: really complex. So it requires some kind of actor with
Speaker 1: the sophistication the ability to do to complex complex thinking
Speaker 1: and actively do it in real time. Like according to
Speaker 1: day after day I was leading up to the election
Speaker 1: and after it. So who's able to do that, right, Yeah?
Speaker 2: I mean I think the CIA is probably what we know,
Speaker 2: have been interfering in elections worldwide for decades, probably since
Speaker 2: it was created, and they've got this. I'm sure they
Speaker 2: could easily create a unit in the CIA whose job
Speaker 2: would be to encrypt the state boards of election and
Speaker 2: be able to control them so that the outcome would
Speaker 2: be whoever the intelligence agency wanted to win. And right now,
Speaker 2: I think the Democratic Party has moved from being a
Speaker 2: nineteen fifties it was a liberal party. There were liberals
Speaker 2: who truly, for instance, didn't like racial injustice. They wanted
Speaker 2: equality of rights, they didn't want a quality of outcomes,
Speaker 2: they wanted equality of rights. And that was Martin Luther King.
Speaker 2: So there was a legitimate basis to the Democratic Party
Speaker 2: within the framework of the constitution. But I think now
Speaker 2: the Democratic Party has become a communist party. I think
Speaker 2: we should quit calling it the Democratic Party and we
Speaker 2: should call it the Communist Party. And I think they're
Speaker 2: very close to becoming a treason his party because it
Speaker 2: does seems to me that now the Democrats, state by
Speaker 2: state and nationally. Every voter regulation they want implemented is
Speaker 2: one that would make cheating easier, destroy the integrity of voting.
Speaker 1: Carland Favarrito in Georgia calls it the war against election integrity.
Speaker 1: So I mean or again, like the norm is that
Speaker 1: you want it to be clear, effect ive, everybody trusts it.
Speaker 1: Now you can't trust it, and the whole society is
Speaker 1: going to crumble because nobody will believe the person who
Speaker 1: running actually won. Which is so the tie between the
Speaker 1: so called the fishial I won't even call them elected
Speaker 1: in the public is there's no tie, because that's what
Speaker 1: the voting is supposed to do.
Speaker 2: Right exactly. And you know, voting is fundamental to our rights.
Speaker 2: It's the cornerstone of our rights. And this is the
Speaker 2: it's sank or sanct under the fourteenth Amendment, our franchise rights.
Speaker 2: And so therefore, if the Democrats are trying to undermine
Speaker 2: our franchise rights, they're trying to undermine the Constitution. And
Speaker 2: that's treason. Yeah, So I think there's not only criminal
Speaker 2: acts being committed here. I think these acts amount of treason,
Speaker 2: and I think we should start looking for criminal prosecutions
Speaker 2: that reach that level. And treason is a capital crime.
Speaker 1: It's treason us to do the stamp. They have to
Speaker 1: find out who's putting these algorithms in there. How is
Speaker 1: this being Why isn't somebody from a database expert categorically
Speaker 1: just monitoring who's coming and going from these things. They've
Speaker 1: they've proven since the last election that these machines can
Speaker 1: be accessed through the Internet. And something they lie, They
Speaker 1: lie about everything. The line said they didn't hook them
Speaker 1: up to the internet, and then they were on the internet.
Speaker 1: So it's a joke. And I reason, well, the only
Speaker 1: reason we have these these machines, doctor CORSEI is for fraud.
Speaker 1: That's why they're there. It's black box voting.
Speaker 2: Well, and what we the point is, there's probably been
Speaker 2: election fraud since the first election. People are thinking about
Speaker 2: cheating elections and winning, but not on this. And if
Speaker 2: we had access to the computers with an intent to
Speaker 2: do in legitimate law enforcement. Now now our Department of
Speaker 2: Justice has also become, you know, a communist Department of Justice.
Speaker 2: They're like the KGB, you know, they're out to enforce,
Speaker 2: out to make sure that the white supremacists are the
Speaker 2: Catholics who like the Latin mass. You know, the average
Speaker 2: age of that is probably sixty five to eighty. Those
Speaker 2: are the real criminals of this society, according to the
Speaker 2: Department of Justice. Incredible, and so what I'm saying here
Speaker 2: is that the last sentence of this is that election
Speaker 2: part of the magnitude that the Georgian nerds have been
Speaker 2: covered demands criminal charges that might actually reach state and
Speaker 2: federal officials who knowingly advanced schemes to deny citizens of
Speaker 2: their Fourteenth Amendment franchase rights and manipulate elections that amount
Speaker 2: to nothing more than a treason as coupdetap Okay. So
Speaker 2: this is serious business. This is not and I think
Speaker 2: one of the ways we're gonna stop it is not
Speaker 2: only to expose it, which Andrew Piquett has done a
Speaker 2: great job of with the algorithms in all these states,
Speaker 2: but not only to expose it, but to explain to
Speaker 2: people the patterns so when it starts happening, you can
Speaker 2: suspect it and then you can do something about it. Okay. Now,
Speaker 2: one of the solutions to this that we have, and
Speaker 2: I've been actively proposing this, there's a recent court decision
Speaker 2: and I'll pull it up here on a copy of
Speaker 2: it here. The court decision is it's called American Encore
Speaker 2: the Adrian Fontes American encore E n c O RI
Speaker 2: versus Adrian A d r I A and Fonte's f
Speaker 2: O n Tees Fontest. Fontest was the Secretary of State
Speaker 2: in Arizona. It still is.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: This is a two thousand and two case that was
Speaker 2: in the US District Court, the District of Arizona. This
Speaker 2: is a federal case. Federal it's not a state case,
Speaker 2: which means that it has a more presidential impact because
Speaker 2: if it's a federal case, it's going to proceed and
Speaker 2: supposedly inform state decisions. Now, in twenty twenty two, the
Speaker 2: midterm election, the county county co chiefs and Arizona refused
Speaker 2: to certify the election because they thought the machines were
Speaker 2: switching votes and they want to a handcount of the ballots,
Speaker 2: and Fonte said, no, you can't do that. So Coachi's
Speaker 2: county refused to certify the election. Now, Fantes had written
Speaker 2: an election procedure or manual which governed the administration of
Speaker 2: elections in Arizona. And what he did is he did
Speaker 2: a provision that said if a county does not canvas
Speaker 2: by a deadline. Canvas means certify. Then he can canvass
Speaker 2: the other counties and report the state is certified without
Speaker 2: Cochise County. Now what the district court did, It was
Speaker 2: Judge Michael Liberti l I b U rd I, who,
Speaker 2: by the way, had spent time and very well known
Speaker 2: in the Arizona State legislature. Judge Liberty ruled that this
Speaker 2: was unconstitutional because it disenfranchised the voters in Cochies County.
Speaker 2: Their votes didn't count, okay, And he wrote in the opinion,
Speaker 2: the right to vote is fundamental, and he quoted a
Speaker 2: nineteen sixty six case quote a state law practice that
Speaker 2: unduly burdens or restricts the fundamental right to vote violates
Speaker 2: equal protection clause of the fourteenth Amendment. And so plaintiffs
Speaker 2: argue that the playing terms of the canvas provision require
Speaker 2: the secretary to nullify a county's vote of the county
Speaker 2: Board of Supervisors fails to timely canvas. So courts have
Speaker 2: routinely recognized that disenfranchisement is a severe burden on the
Speaker 2: right to vote. And he quoted another case from twenty
Speaker 2: sixteen said, if disenfranchising thousands of eligible voters does not
Speaker 2: amount to a severe burden on the right to vote,
Speaker 2: then this court is at a loss as to what does.
Speaker 2: Now this court case empowers the supervisors in any county
Speaker 2: to say we will not certify this election because we
Speaker 2: suspect fraud. Okay, that's an important power. Now, it's going
Speaker 2: to take a supervisor with some courage, because they're gonna
Speaker 2: be threatened if they do this, and they'll probably face
Speaker 2: death up threats, and they're gonna have to be willing
Speaker 2: to have their lives at risk by saying there's fraud
Speaker 2: here and I won't certify a fraud. Okay, But if
Speaker 2: they do that, then one of the remedies is before
Speaker 2: the case the state is certified, we can do investigations. Now,
Speaker 2: if we say we want to start investigating the mail
Speaker 2: in ballots, there's a number of things we can do.
Speaker 2: We can start, first of all, saying, do the signatures
Speaker 2: on the mail in ballots match the signatures on the
Speaker 2: registration cards. They're supposed to match, well, in many cases
Speaker 2: they're not going to match. Is the signal mature on
Speaker 2: the on the out cover the cover sheet the same
Speaker 2: as the voter Well, in many cases they're not, because
Speaker 2: that person might have been voting, harvesting and voting for
Speaker 2: four hundred or four thousand people you don't know. On Pennsylvania,
Speaker 2: there were twenty three hundred mail in ballots that were
Speaker 2: delivered to a county that the same person signed them
Speaker 2: all as the voter basically did all those signatures, and
Speaker 2: the handwriting was found to be the same. Now you
Speaker 2: can also see if the ballots were folded or if
Speaker 2: they show any signs of having been postmarked, because if
Speaker 2: they're you know, fraudulently voted, they may just have been
Speaker 2: printed in the machine and run through the tabulating machine.
Speaker 2: But you're not going to mail a ballot out to
Speaker 2: somebody who doesn't exist. Wouldn't do any good, okay, So,
Speaker 2: and you're certainly not going to be mailing two or
Speaker 2: three or twenty ballots somebody who doesn't know they have
Speaker 2: twenty ballots in the state, didn't know they were cloned, okay,
Speaker 2: you know, maybe lived in a different state like this
Speaker 2: South Carolina example. You can also go out and take
Speaker 2: a sample of the mail in ballots and see if
Speaker 2: those people actually exist at those addresses and whether they
Speaker 2: have a right to vote. In many cases, these mail
Speaker 2: in ballots are being requested by people go out, they're
Speaker 2: paid to get four hundred or you know more people
Speaker 2: to sign for register me. So they go to homeless
Speaker 2: camps and register everybody who pay them something so they
Speaker 2: get drugs and register their address as a fire station. Okay.
Speaker 2: And and if Kamala gets eighty percent of the mail
Speaker 2: in votes, and you say, you know, we're finding that
Speaker 2: fifty percent of the votes that were cast, we're gonna
Speaker 2: eliminate fifty of the mail and votes are going to
Speaker 2: just be thrown away. Well, you know, so then amounts
Speaker 2: to ten thousand votes. We'll say Kamala is getting eighty
Speaker 2: percent of the mail and votes, so we're gonna take
Speaker 2: eight thousand votes away from Kamala and two thousand votes
Speaker 2: away from Trump because we're going to presume that that
Speaker 2: eighty percent held for the ones that were fraudulent. So again,
Speaker 2: there are remedies here if but once the election is certified,
Speaker 2: that's when courts won't hear the case because it was
Speaker 2: the job of the supervisors to have checked out these issues.
Speaker 2: And what the Democrats are doing is either picking supervisors
Speaker 2: who will rubber stamp things, not ask hard questions or
Speaker 2: afraid to ask hard questions and we'll just go with
Speaker 2: the flow.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they're frontloaded. They're front loaded in for the election.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's the same thing. I mean even Biden admitted,
Speaker 1: he said we have the most effisticated voot or fraud operation.
Speaker 1: He admits things in his demented state or dementia state.
Speaker 1: So I think that was right. So all these states
Speaker 1: have front loaded assets to ensure that the Democrats win,
Speaker 1: and they're probably going to try to do it again
Speaker 1: or they are doing it again, right according.
Speaker 2: To well, they are doing it again because we found
Speaker 2: the algorithms. And now with Georgia, we have a group
Speaker 2: that's actually gone in and produced the votes.
Speaker 1: We have.
Speaker 2: Now we can show you the votes that were fraudulent.
Speaker 2: What we don't know is who did it, you know.
Speaker 2: And I also think that in these schemes there have
Speaker 2: to be people within the state board of Election who
Speaker 2: are handling the ballots, who know what's going on, and
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, and wanted to happen. They don't
Speaker 2: realize the committing crimes, you know, they think this is
Speaker 2: just their job. Boards. You know, politics is like war.
Speaker 2: Anything is fair you do to get away with it. Well,
Speaker 2: it's just not the case. In fact, there are some
Speaker 2: very serious laws here, and there are pelonies and as
Speaker 2: I say, even potential with treason here. And you know,
Speaker 2: you just can't act as if it aren't we clever.
Speaker 1: And this could be the end of the republic. I mean,
Speaker 1: if the wrong person gets in, it's not I mean
Speaker 1: the public is kind of hanging by a thread to this,
Speaker 1: so to speak. But like you get the wrong person
Speaker 1: in who doesn't deserve there there's no validated vote, Like
Speaker 1: how are you supposed to hold on? How is your
Speaker 1: power legitimate in any way, shape or form. This intro
Speaker 1: paragraph to this lawsuit American Encore versus Fontees is something
Speaker 1: else because the judge rights, Given the widespread controversy surrounding elections,
Speaker 1: one would hope the last people responsible for disenfranchising voters
Speaker 1: and suppressing speech would be the very election officials tasked
Speaker 1: with ensuring fair and accurate elections. But according to plaintiffs,
Speaker 1: that is precisely the case here.
Speaker 2: And they proved it. Yeah, and you know that this
Speaker 2: whole just disregarding a coach's county, Well, we don't need
Speaker 2: coach if they if you're not going to come along
Speaker 2: with the steal, then we don't.
Speaker 1: Need you, right, That was their way around it. This
Speaker 1: is just published.
Speaker 2: September twenty seventh. It's a very recent decision. And again,
Speaker 2: what what I think is happening is people are learning,
Speaker 2: I would hope, how to file better cases. I mean,
Speaker 2: these cases that are filed to show a past election
Speaker 2: was stolen are very problematic. You know, I would when
Speaker 2: Sidney Kraken said she had the Kraken you know she
Speaker 2: could well, you know, if she couldn't prove all those
Speaker 2: cases were fraudulent, you know, if there wasn't another explanation
Speaker 2: for some of them, she was in trouble. It's the
Speaker 2: same with you know, Michael Lindell who was saying that
Speaker 2: the dominion machines are switching votes, Well, there are legitimate
Speaker 2: reasons why machines switch votes during elections. I mean, you
Speaker 2: have no idea how haphazard it is with this data
Speaker 2: coming into you from precincts all over the country and
Speaker 2: not with consistent reporting rules or habits. I mean, some
Speaker 2: of them report when they're fifty percent counted. Some report
Speaker 2: won't report until they're entirely counted, and you know, the
Speaker 2: numbers change and they can change. Legitimately, you're trying to
Speaker 2: get the correct numbers. So it's not prime of facia
Speaker 2: evidence that because the numbers can change in the computers,
Speaker 2: that they are fraudulent and so therefore dominion gets, you know,
Speaker 2: to have a massive defamation case depending upon how Mike
Speaker 2: Lindell argues it. And typically these people have engaged in
Speaker 2: hyperbole exaggerating what they can prove. What I'm saying here
Speaker 2: is that the algorithms can be shown to exist. Now
Speaker 2: we've got people like the Georgia nerds who are showing
Speaker 2: them being used. But I'm saying these algorithms have been
Speaker 2: in some of this state since two thousand and four.
Speaker 2: In the other states is two thousand and seven. I
Speaker 2: want to know how many people in the US Congress
Speaker 2: and in the US Senate were elected by algorithms rather
Speaker 2: than voters. I don't know, right, that's a good question,
Speaker 2: but you know, I mean, we have a lot of
Speaker 2: Democrats in Congress, and I'm not sure the Democrats have
Speaker 2: been that popular. Somehow, the Democrats don't seem to be,
Speaker 2: you know, the party of the people anymore. They seem
Speaker 2: to be this extreme, you know, woke fringe engaging in
Speaker 2: a very bizarre combination of neo Marxism, and I wrote
Speaker 2: a book on the truth on Neo Marxism, cultural Maoism,
Speaker 2: and anarchy. You know, these postmodern neo Marxists who you
Speaker 2: get agent mal political correctness, and so therefore you've got
Speaker 2: a you know, a very politicized democratic party that typically
Speaker 2: only appeals to a small percentage of voters. Yet they
Speaker 2: threatened to hold the majority of the House representatives, including
Speaker 2: in this current election.
Speaker 1: Don't you think the whole fifty to fifty kind of
Speaker 1: close thing is one big phantom as well, not just
Speaker 1: phantom voters, but these phantom polls, Like these polls are dodgy,
Speaker 1: is all all? Hell? I mean, they're they're fake. I
Speaker 1: think what's what's Kamala's real popularity? It's that they keep
Speaker 1: saying it's like flipping around. I think it's like she
Speaker 1: never was popular in her own party, right, they like
Speaker 1: anointed her as a presidential contender without like, you know,
Speaker 1: a party vote. It's incredible. So I don't think she's
Speaker 1: that popular. I don't think that. I think that our
Speaker 1: popularity is fake. It's fake as some of these phantom
Speaker 1: clone voters and well, you're right.
Speaker 2: If the intelligence agencies, if I'm writing the intelligence agencies
Speaker 2: are beginning to run this. I think they're doing it
Speaker 2: worldwide because I think there's just too many elections that
Speaker 2: are showing up. You know, the European election. The there's
Speaker 2: two ballots. First ballot the Conservatives do very well. Then
Speaker 2: second ballot they say, well, left one because the left
Speaker 2: woke up and it's surged. And I call up in
Speaker 2: France and Italy and say, are the people voting that
Speaker 2: is there a surge and voters showing up? No, doctor COURSI,
Speaker 2: there's no voters at the polls. The surge is happening
Speaker 2: in the machines.
Speaker 1: Okay, And so much like the algorithm in Brazil, right,
Speaker 1: you can see it just like slowly move a Bolson arrow.
Speaker 1: I forgot the other guy who's up against but it's
Speaker 1: like at the end, you know, it just mysteriously had
Speaker 1: the surge and that put him over the top.
Speaker 2: Well, I wrote an article on an American thinker. And
Speaker 2: by the way, God's Five Stones is where we have
Speaker 2: all of this information archived, and I thank everybody who's
Speaker 2: given us donations, and it's completely we're operating. It's on donations,
Speaker 2: and I think we're going to We're going to continue
Speaker 2: this afterwards because I'm going to try to get these
Speaker 2: algorithms fully exposed and out of these databases and we
Speaker 2: show people how the cheating is being done, so it's
Speaker 2: no longer. And I'm not saying that, you know, not
Speaker 2: saying anybody is criminal, not saying any election is stolen.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying the algorithm shouldn't be there. Who put
Speaker 2: them there, We know how long they've been used, how
Speaker 2: often they've been used, and who's doing it. And I
Speaker 2: want to know if if this vote switching is done
Speaker 2: with an intention now to benefit Kamala. And so I'm
Speaker 2: asking questions. I'm not making accusations, but important. It's very
Speaker 2: important because from a legal point of view, I have
Speaker 2: a right to ask questions. And you know, if I
Speaker 2: start making allegations and pointing fingers at people or states,
Speaker 2: even I have to have proof. And until there's forensic
Speaker 2: work done here, George is getting George is getting proof.
Speaker 2: But again, but again that's going to take a lot
Speaker 2: of forensic work to really root this out. And you
Speaker 2: know this is going to take time and money to
Speaker 2: get it done. Now, what I questioned is whether or
Speaker 2: not the intelligence agencies are aiming to run another article
Speaker 2: on American Thinker. But doing articles American Thinker and Gateway
Speaker 2: Pundit and also on my website, Thetruthcentral dot com. But
Speaker 2: the Gods five stones dot com is where you can
Speaker 2: find all the papers. There's a video archive with a
Speaker 2: tremendous number of videos on it. This video will go
Speaker 2: on that archive as soon as I get the file.
Speaker 2: Now I'm asking the question of because you see, when
Speaker 2: when you have the algorithms in these computers, I could
Speaker 2: say I was the criminal running this. I'm political scientist.
Speaker 2: I understand elections. I'm been dealing with election data since
Speaker 2: the nineteen sixties when I was undergraduated Case Western Reserve.
Speaker 2: Political science professors used to get contracts to call elections
Speaker 2: of the television stations. That I would go down to
Speaker 2: WJWTV and on Euclid Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio with political
Speaker 2: science professors and we would call the elections. That I
Speaker 2: would sit there and do the analytics. This candidate needs
Speaker 2: so many votes in this precinct in order to be ahead,
Speaker 2: or if they don't get them, they're behind. So what
Speaker 2: I'm asking is the following. If I had this system,
Speaker 2: I could say, okay, you know, should our candidate, the
Speaker 2: one we want to win, win by one percent, three
Speaker 2: percent or more? Should they lead throughout the day or
Speaker 2: do you want to surge later in the voting, or
Speaker 2: do you want us to stop the voting. We'll bring
Speaker 2: in the ballots in the morning. Just tell me how
Speaker 2: you want the election to look, and I'll pull out
Speaker 2: my clones and make it look that way, okay, because
Speaker 2: I can cast these certifiable fraudulent votes as needed and
Speaker 2: when needed. And then I also go into the fact
Speaker 2: that Klaus Schwab for instand the World Economic Forum, has
Speaker 2: said recently said this in twenty seventeen, So the suggestive
Speaker 2: voters are becoming obsolete. But since the next step could
Speaker 2: be to go into prescriptive space, which means you do
Speaker 2: not even have to have elections anymore, because you can
Speaker 2: always predict what the voters are going to do, and
Speaker 2: you can say, you know, why do we need elections
Speaker 2: because we know what the results are going to be,
Speaker 2: So why not just run a simulation of the election,
Speaker 2: and if you don't like the outcome of the election,
Speaker 2: throw the votes away and abstitute your simulation. Who would
Speaker 2: know the difference?
Speaker 1: Right, it's incredible. You mentioned dystopia. It's total dystopia. And
Speaker 1: the other thing is that you think that it's real.
Speaker 1: So it's like a huge Truman Yeah, Truman show mind
Speaker 1: ConTroll thing, like, oh, I guess it was real. I
Speaker 1: don't know. And so the cover up is part of
Speaker 1: it too, right, so they can create the votes and
Speaker 1: then take them back out so that you'll see no
Speaker 1: proof that that's what happens. So it's incredible. Well, I
Speaker 1: just want to read a comment because Denver rates for
Speaker 1: the two thousand and four election Ohio swung to Bush
Speaker 1: when the Ohio count was tabulated in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and
Speaker 1: a small business nobody remembers named smart tech totally compartmentalized.
Speaker 1: Did they even know what they were doing? Probably not.
Speaker 2: Well, again, you know, there's a lot of potential here,
Speaker 2: a lot of potential for these algorithms to be used
Speaker 2: by either side or if the intelligence agencies are the
Speaker 2: one deciding they pick which candidates they want to use
Speaker 2: it for now, I think I think right now the
Speaker 2: intelligence agencies are aligned with the aligned with the Democrats,
Speaker 2: and I think they both want to destroy America.
Speaker 1: Look all the people who support a Kamala. It's like
Speaker 1: like old state, like you know that people jump jump
Speaker 1: party lines, right. I think uh Cheney for sure supporting her.
Speaker 1: So some very odd characters popping in, So maybe that
Speaker 1: support is showing I'm supporting you with this wave. Right.
Speaker 1: Perhaps that's speculation, but some of his people know how
Speaker 1: to pull the string, so to speak, behind things. And
Speaker 1: before I forget, people go to doctor Corsi's Twitter and
Speaker 1: follow him for me, if you can all go to Twitter,
Speaker 1: I'll put a link to his Twitter. I want to
Speaker 1: see if he's shadow band, so I'd like to see
Speaker 1: his Twitter followers go over five thousand. I'm sure that is.
Speaker 2: I'm completely shadow band on x on Twitter, I mean
Speaker 2: on Twitter, I mean on YouTube, on YouTube, shadow band,
Speaker 2: shadow band all over the place. But on YouTube, they
Speaker 2: they restrained the number of I can get. I've got
Speaker 2: more on YouTube because it's been historical. I've had that
Speaker 2: for a long time, that account. But every two or
Speaker 2: three days they give me, you know, they give me
Speaker 2: another take down a video and you'll give you a
Speaker 2: bad mark and take you off for ten days and
Speaker 2: then threaten to give you three strikes and take you
Speaker 2: out altogether.
Speaker 1: On my third or fourth YouTube account. I don't even
Speaker 1: know some of the I mean they destroyed like ten
Speaker 1: years of my work too, like I had this old account.
Speaker 1: So it's really a shame. It's not just censorship, it's
Speaker 1: literal like memory hole stuff.
Speaker 2: So yeah, they want it gone permanently. I mean, if
Speaker 2: you right now use Google and just type in climate change,
Speaker 2: you'll get twenty pages of ip c C, you know,
Speaker 2: the Governmental Panel on Climate Change propaganda from the UN.
Speaker 2: Climate change is real. It's a horrible problem. We've got
Speaker 2: to take all these drastic steps, all of which is nonsense,
Speaker 2: total nonsense, total nonsense. But yet that's the narrative that
Speaker 2: the left wants to utilize to destroy America. Well, you know,
Speaker 2: the the intelligence agencies have also, I think never been
Speaker 2: I wrote a book earlier this year in the assassination
Speaker 2: John F. Kennedy. I'm it's quite clear from the X rays.
Speaker 2: Doctor Mantick has been doing thirty years of work on
Speaker 2: the X rays. He's a radiation oncologist with the PhD
Speaker 2: and physics, you know, genius when it comes to X rays.
Speaker 2: He's took a dense autometer into the three JFK skull
Speaker 2: X rays that are extant in the archives, and he
Speaker 2: demonstrated all three have been altered forged to mask evidence
Speaker 2: frontal shots. And there's two frontal shots clear you know.
Speaker 2: One hit Jack Kennedy in the templar bone by the
Speaker 2: right ear and blew out the back of his head,
Speaker 2: right back of his head, and the other hit it
Speaker 2: at the hairline above his right eye, and you can
Speaker 2: see the bullet break up inside his skull and the
Speaker 2: largest fragments at the back and it didn't exit. So
Speaker 2: that's clearly a frontal shot. The evidence in the X
Speaker 2: rays have been there for sixty one years, and the
Speaker 2: you know, and the CIA knew his frontal shots because
Speaker 2: the shot that hit Jack Kennedy the templar bone, and
Speaker 2: it occurred a frame twenty, you could see the side
Speaker 2: of Jack Kennedy's head explode. He's thrown back violently to
Speaker 2: the left and Clint Hill, who's a Secret Service agent,
Speaker 2: climbing in the back of the Jack. The limousine, the
Speaker 2: presidential limousine on the left, gets splattered with JFK's blood
Speaker 2: and gore, as does the motorcycle cop behind him. And
Speaker 2: that's a shot for the grassy Knoll they knew it.
Speaker 2: So again the lying starts as soon as the assassination
Speaker 2: is done.
Speaker 1: Right, it's still resonating today, Like I mean, you say
Speaker 1: the attempt on Trump right July, so.
Speaker 2: Well it's going and the CIA, you know, has been
Speaker 2: in control, and as I say, I think their determination
Speaker 2: now is to go to this new world order. And
Speaker 2: the Dallas brothers, the Dallas brothers under Eisenhower, John Foster
Speaker 2: Dobbs was Secretary of State and Allan Dallas was the
Speaker 2: head of the CIA, Well, the State Department today is
Speaker 2: just the political action arm of the CIA, and News
Speaker 2: maybe are just the you know, the mockingbird press of
Speaker 2: the CIA. And so therefore you can see the algorithms
Speaker 2: being programmed into the narrative. So Biden obviously can't be
Speaker 2: the candidate, because Biden is so manally deficient after the
Speaker 2: first debate with Trump that nobody's going to believe he
Speaker 2: can beat pull even so, you know, they pulled coutetan
Speaker 2: get rid of Biden and then picked Kamalaw who doesn't
Speaker 2: win a single primary. There's no real vote to her
Speaker 2: to have her be vice president, vote to be the
Speaker 2: president chill candidate. But yet they can say, oh, but
Speaker 2: her polls are doing so well, look, her polls are
Speaker 2: pulling even they're fake, just like they're doing today right now.
Speaker 2: Well her post, she's leading in some poll they said
Speaker 2: she had a forty eight to forty four percent lead
Speaker 2: in Iowa. Well, you know, some people studied that poll.
Speaker 2: They out found that it was oversampled for liberal white
Speaker 2: women on you know, who were traditional liberals older, and
Speaker 2: the legitimate polls show Trumps I had ten points in Iowa.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No, the poles are propaganda. No, they're part of
Speaker 1: the propaganda apparatus. There's no question about it. People don't
Speaker 1: doubt it at all. They're almost all fixed. Well, they're
Speaker 1: not reliable anyway, because who answers it right.
Speaker 2: They're only set up to make the steel look credible.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, they're fake. There anybody who like relies on
Speaker 1: poles is doing a disservice. And there's major journalists which
Speaker 1: makes me question their authenticity and integrity promoting these poles.
Speaker 1: So you kind of wonder who's pulling the strings for them.
Speaker 1: And you mentioned KU data. How many coup deytas have
Speaker 1: we had in United Well that's a good.
Speaker 2: Question, I mean, that's good. You know, why do buildings
Speaker 2: that were not hit by the airplanes in nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: Building seven, Why does it come down?
Speaker 1: Why did that? Why is it not reported and not reported?
Speaker 2: Yeah? What about nineteen ninety one we invade Iraq because
Speaker 2: Colin Paul tells the UN Solomon saying has weapons of
Speaker 2: mass destruction. We don't find any weapons of mass destruction. Okay,
Speaker 2: So we have a bad pandemic that is declared a
Speaker 2: global lockdown, and the vaccine that doesn't prevent you from
Speaker 2: getting the virus veact Fauci I think has had it
Speaker 2: three times. But the vaccine might kill you, right, And
Speaker 2: so therefore, how much has the CIA been running? How
Speaker 2: much of a Truman show?
Speaker 1: We've been living in the You know, they want.
Speaker 2: Perpetual wars, bankrupting the United States. They're destroying our currency,
Speaker 2: doing inflation that ruins the middle class. And before World
Speaker 2: War Two, the Dulles brothers, together with Prescott Bush and
Speaker 2: Brown brothers Harriman were funding Hitler. They've always liked this
Speaker 2: self appointed little elite and the multinational corporations ruling everybody
Speaker 2: as the transhumanists and all the rest of us are
Speaker 2: not needed. So again, you know, I questioned whether the
Speaker 2: whether the CIA has been treason US since at least
Speaker 2: it killed Jack Kennedy and covered it up. And I
Speaker 2: don't think the current elections are any different. If these
Speaker 2: algorithms had to be put there by somebody, and every
Speaker 2: one of these algorithms and all these states. The algorithms
Speaker 2: very depending upon the mathematical formulas, and there's variations in them,
Speaker 2: but they're all designed the same way to do the
Speaker 2: same thing, create false votes that can be hidden and
Speaker 2: voted with sort of viable numbers. So you know, this
Speaker 2: is a We've uncovered a massive scheme that is international
Speaker 2: and it's now been exposed and so therefore, depending the
Speaker 2: the only you know, final solution to this is if
Speaker 2: the Trump vote is so overwhelming that they can't get
Speaker 2: a way with cheating because it would be just too obvious.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, And then it's like it's a disaster. If
Speaker 1: people don't trust the government of the validity of people
Speaker 1: in power, it's gonna it's like a civil war status
Speaker 1: or sub civil war. Something strange will happen because people
Speaker 1: will be like, well, why am I paying taxis you
Speaker 1: guys stole it? You're criminals? So I mean it's we're
Speaker 1: not in a great shape. I mean, it's incredible. So
Speaker 1: this is different than twenty twenty in that people are
Speaker 1: finding this algorithm and the change before it happened right
Speaker 1: before the election happened. So this is different. There's evidence
Speaker 1: there's a lot more eyeballs too, like people are anticipating this.
Speaker 1: So a lot of a lot of different structures.
Speaker 2: Well, I say, it's kind of like a magician's trick.
Speaker 2: A magician's trick works because of misdirection and you're watching
Speaker 2: the wrong thing. But as soon as you've learned how
Speaker 2: the trick is done, that the you know, the rabbit
Speaker 2: is pulled out of the magician's coat, not out of
Speaker 2: the hat, you know, and you really know how the
Speaker 2: rabbit appears to be in the hat or gets there,
Speaker 2: you realize that the trick is uninteresting because you're down
Speaker 2: and see how it's done. Well, once you see how this,
Speaker 2: the algorithms permit false votes to be created, how they
Speaker 2: probably you know, put in the database, retrieve, voted, and eliminated.
Speaker 2: You know you've got the modus operandi, and so you
Speaker 2: know what you're looking for, you know where to find
Speaker 2: it and when when you know Piquet finds an algorithm
Speaker 2: in the database. Well, the States say, well, I don't
Speaker 2: know whether that is operational.
Speaker 1: Well, excuse me that.
Speaker 2: The data the algorithm ordered how your voters got from
Speaker 2: number one to number whatever, and so it was used
Speaker 2: without your knowing it in order to prepare the cards
Speaker 2: or mark card and then to create them and hide them.
Speaker 2: So what do you mean you don't know if we
Speaker 2: operation or used. And by the way, the fact that
Speaker 2: it's there, we can show you just like that. We
Speaker 2: started out placing one eleven units between you and the
Speaker 2: next one. That's that's how it's ordered. And so you know,
Speaker 2: you might not like your clitting in geometry, but you
Speaker 2: can't deny that the Pythagorean theorem works. It's mathematics. It works.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No, it's incredible, amazing work, and I appreciate you
Speaker 1: coming on the show. Where's the best place for people
Speaker 1: to find I'll put a link to your website, but
Speaker 1: also your books. Some don't even pop up on Google Google.
Speaker 1: I like Google lag now to call Google. I couldn't
Speaker 1: find typing the title of your book, your newest book
Speaker 1: on JFK in there and it didn't pop up. It's crazy.
Speaker 2: Well, the amount of censorship is enormous, and fighting the
Speaker 2: battle when we're censored as hard as we are, it
Speaker 2: makes it a lot harder to win. But yet shows
Speaker 2: like yours help us to get the word out, and
Speaker 2: I'm doing as many of these shows as I can.
Speaker 2: I don't think we're going to be I don't think
Speaker 2: this is going to be over tomorrow.
Speaker 1: I don't think.
Speaker 2: I don't think November fifth is the end of this.
Speaker 2: I think we've got a continuing battle, and I don't
Speaker 2: know what the I know. This structure of voting is
Speaker 2: so messed up that I don't know that it can
Speaker 2: be fixed. I think we're gonna have to come up
Speaker 2: with something fundamentally different in order to preserve the fact
Speaker 2: that you have a unique voter ID that cannot be compromised,
Speaker 2: and that's not going to be easy.
Speaker 1: India has a paper vote. They count at one point
Speaker 1: two billion people all in one day, so it can
Speaker 1: be done well. I mean.
Speaker 2: And also there are credit card systems that work. If
Speaker 2: you miss a credit card payment, you're going to find
Speaker 2: out about it right away, if you you know, if
Speaker 2: you are the airlines assign everybody's seats and everything's done
Speaker 2: by a computer system, and you don't very rarely get
Speaker 2: double the signing of a seat and everything's done through
Speaker 2: your cell phone. It's accurate and it works, so.
Speaker 1: It can be done right. The voter system is designed
Speaker 1: for fraud. There's no doubt. It is designed designed to
Speaker 1: for be to be fraudulent. That's right. I mean that
Speaker 1: goes back to your theme, coup de talk. How many people,
Speaker 1: how many people in converse and or even state government,
Speaker 1: how many people deserve to be there? Kamala Harrison or
Speaker 1: I think it was her Attorney general of California election
Speaker 1: did the same thing. They've counted the votes for three
Speaker 1: or four days after the vote, and she magically won
Speaker 1: by like three or four thousand votes. Could it happen again, Sure.
Speaker 2: But again, if that happens now, people are alerted to it.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And when it happened back then in twenty twenty, you
Speaker 2: know they're making argument this was all legitimate, and they
Speaker 2: closed the poll watchers that kept them out. They brought
Speaker 2: these ballots in the middle of the night. They said,
Speaker 2: steam pipes broke. I mean, they did all kinds of.
Speaker 1: Things to cover the windows. What are you hiding?
Speaker 2: I think I don't think it's going to be as
Speaker 2: easy to do those things this time. And if the
Speaker 2: vote is overwhelming, if the turnout is massive, As a
Speaker 2: political scientist, the polls are really not The polls may
Speaker 2: tell you how many voters are affected by which issues,
Speaker 2: but you don't know those people are really going to vote.
Speaker 2: And the turnout is the finest final litmus test of election.
Speaker 2: So from a political science point of view, turnout determines elections,
Speaker 2: not polls.
Speaker 1: Right amen, We will put links to all your materials
Speaker 1: and I will put this out right away. And where's
Speaker 1: the best place for people to reach you or contact
Speaker 1: you if they have any further.
Speaker 2: Questions, Well, godsfivestones dot com is the best. I even
Speaker 2: put one of my emails up there. I'll write at
Speaker 2: the top of the website so people can and do
Speaker 2: comment to me. And so they're God's five Stones. And
Speaker 2: we do appreciate the donations, and please continue to donate.
Speaker 2: We're going to continue this operation going until we get
Speaker 2: a legitimate election result and hopefully solve this problem of
Speaker 2: getting these algorithms out of the State Board of Election databases.
Speaker 1: And there's tons of archives here. You've got video archives,
Speaker 1: podcast writings, Roles analysis of the states that we mentioned
Speaker 1: earlier mission statements, so tons of information there, so people
Speaker 1: go check out God's five Stones. And the guest today
Speaker 1: was doctor Jerome.
Speaker 2: Of course you thank you so much for your time,
Speaker 2: my great pleasure.
Speaker 1: Thank your stay there there