Speaker 1: Time for the nine first morning weather forecast Dense fog advisory.
Speaker 1: If it's still please be careful out there. It was
Speaker 1: just really dense this morning, so mind your commute please.
Speaker 1: I mostly cloudy day. It'll be today with midday showers
Speaker 1: and breezy conditions fifty two from the high down to
Speaker 1: thirty four. Overnight with a wintery mix thirty six to
Speaker 1: high Tomorrow with scattered snow showers overnight down to thirty
Speaker 1: two with a little evening snow likely. And for Friday,
Speaker 1: we're going up to forty four degrees. It'll be cloudy
Speaker 1: all day and a chance of rain will happen all
Speaker 1: day fifty one. Right now, time for a traffic update
Speaker 1: from Chuck.
Speaker 2: Ingram from the UCUP Traffic Center.
Speaker 3: Are you one of the thirty eight million Americans impacted
Speaker 3: by diabetes? Got personal, honest education and treatment options from
Speaker 3: the experts at UCA help Learn more at uchelp dot com.
Speaker 3: Crews continue to work with an accident eastbound on the
Speaker 3: Reagan Highway.
Speaker 2: This is near Gaviick.
Speaker 3: Traffic's backing close to Hamilton Avenue, North Bend seventy five.
Speaker 3: That's a broken down before you got to Mitchell. That
Speaker 3: adds to some heavier traffic towards downstream inbound seventy four
Speaker 3: starting to improve after an earlier accident near Peakman as
Speaker 3: we get closer and closer to the holidays, to start
Speaker 3: to reflect on what we are thankful for, like pumpkin
Speaker 3: pie and three cans of ready whip, and also our
Speaker 3: next guest, the Judge is next thankful for his interviews
Speaker 3: all year long. Chuck Ingram on fifty five KRC Deep
Speaker 3: Talk Station.
Speaker 1: Hey, thirty fifty five KR City Talk Station, Well, that
Speaker 1: was pleasant, not searching.
Speaker 2: For, very very generous and very kind of him. And
Speaker 2: it's a well standing, well pumpkin piece comparing me to
Speaker 2: something I love.
Speaker 1: That's great and something that's an opinion. Of course all
Speaker 1: of my listeners share, sometimes disagreeing with you, sometimes agree
Speaker 1: with you. I welcome the debate, the conversation, and you
Speaker 1: and I being of the little l I tell myself
Speaker 1: a little old libertarian ILK seeing eye to eye on
Speaker 1: almost everything, including what the hell is going on with
Speaker 1: Russia Ukraine and what bothered me the most about this?
Speaker 1: And I was so pleased to read your column, which
Speaker 1: I'm lucky enough to get Biden's lust for war echoing
Speaker 1: many of the sentiments that I had during my conversation
Speaker 1: yesterday with retired Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis, the long range
Speaker 1: missiles which they went ahead and used, and everybody who's
Speaker 1: been paying attention to this, you included for a long
Speaker 1: time knows, including the Russian spokesperson who came out and
Speaker 1: talked about it yesterday, Sergey Markov. You can't fire these
Speaker 1: damn things into the interior of Russia without the United
Speaker 1: States military operating them. So they view this as a
Speaker 1: war between the United States and Russia, and their new
Speaker 1: policy visa VI. That is, if a nuclear powered country,
Speaker 1: ie the United States is assisting a country at war
Speaker 1: with Russia, then Russia is now free in use at
Speaker 1: its decision making nuclear weapons, which scares the living hell
Speaker 1: out of me. Ei. They're talking about nuclear war and
Speaker 1: he even said that hell, we might be in a
Speaker 1: bunker by Christmas time. Judgment Politano, Good.
Speaker 2: Morning, Brian. Always a pleasure.
Speaker 4: You know, if you read the headlines of the Wall
Speaker 4: Street Journal, the New York Times, the Washington Post, or
Speaker 4: watch this on any of the mainstream cable channels, they
Speaker 4: all say the same thing. Ukraine firing long range weapons
Speaker 4: deep into Russia. As you pointed out, and as I
Speaker 4: demonstrated in the column, Ukraine is not firing these the
Speaker 4: United States is. They are aimed by data secured and
Speaker 4: acquired from American satellites. The data is downloaded only by
Speaker 4: a person with a top secret security clearance. The data
Speaker 4: is input into the missile sparatus by another person with
Speaker 4: a top secret security clearance, and then the missile is
Speaker 4: launched by another person with a top secret security clearance.
Speaker 4: It would be a felony, an act of espionage, if
Speaker 4: the Americans were to permit the Ukrainians to do this.
Speaker 4: These are highly guarded and protected secrets. Therefore, when the
Speaker 4: Russians say, we consider this an American an attack on
Speaker 4: an American attack on Russia, they're one hundred percent correct
Speaker 4: what I've just explained. President Putin understands an entry level diplomat,
Speaker 4: and an entry level spy, and an entry level a
Speaker 4: GI understands what I've just explained. The New York Times,
Speaker 4: the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal do not on top.
Speaker 4: Why are we fighting a war against Russia? And did
Speaker 4: I miss something? Did the Congress declare war in Russia?
Speaker 4: Of course it didn't.
Speaker 1: Our favorite topic every years Biden.
Speaker 4: And the death throws of one of the most abysmal
Speaker 4: presidential administrations doing what trying to start World War three,
Speaker 4: trying to put a catastrophe into the lap of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Yes, and you know that is the scariest component of this.
Speaker 1: I mean, whether or not there's a justifiable reason for
Speaker 1: us to be defending Ukraine, and I can't necessarily come
Speaker 1: up with one. It seemed the timing of this seems
Speaker 1: as though the President of the United States of America
Speaker 1: are those that are pulling his puppet strings, want to
Speaker 1: create a catastrophe, a potential global catastrophe, just to set
Speaker 1: Donald Trump off on the wrong path or on a difficult,
Speaker 1: challenging path, the ultimate low political blow, the death of
Speaker 1: potentially millions of people for that political end. And I
Speaker 1: move over on that because it sounds as crazy it is.
Speaker 1: But look at what these missiles accomplished, virtually nothing. They
Speaker 1: shot down most of them. They've got a dome system,
Speaker 1: just like we do, and just like the Israelis do,
Speaker 1: and they haven't had.
Speaker 2: In the Israelis in a better system than we do.
Speaker 4: One got through and it destroyed an ammunition depot, and because.
Speaker 2: It was ammunition in there.
Speaker 4: There were many secondary and tertiary explosions, but nobody, but
Speaker 4: nobody died. The Russians know exactly what's going on here,
Speaker 4: and they'll retaliate in their own time and way. But
Speaker 4: what is extremely dangerous here is the playing with fire
Speaker 4: because of the nuclear capabilities of the United States and
Speaker 4: of Russia, and Ukraine is foolishly allowing itself to get
Speaker 4: in the middle of this. You would think by now
Speaker 4: that President Zelensky would have recognized the United States and
Speaker 4: Great Britain Britain mainly intel, United States intel and military
Speaker 4: forty billion dollars worth of US military so far. Joe
Speaker 4: Biden has seven billion to go, which he plans, according
Speaker 4: to Jake Sullivan, to spend all of in the next
Speaker 4: two months. I guess only the Pentagon can spend three
Speaker 4: and a half billion dollars a month. But you would
Speaker 4: think that Zelensky would recognize that American involvement here was
Speaker 4: not out of empathy, was out of American lust to
Speaker 4: weaken Putin and not giving a dam what happens to Ukraine?
Speaker 4: Six hundred thousand Ukrainian young men dead?
Speaker 1: And why listen? You know how old I am roughly speaking.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm old enough to remember the Soviet Union,
Speaker 1: the Iron Curtain, the Cold War that existed, and the
Speaker 1: Soviet oppression. We had a multitude of reasons to fight
Speaker 1: that type of system, most of which would existed because
Speaker 1: they were a threat to US, an existential threat. Nuclear
Speaker 1: war was a possibility between US and Russia. But with
Speaker 1: the fall of the Soviet Union and this creation of
Speaker 1: this hybrid system of you know, dictatorship, oligarchy, whatever you
Speaker 1: want to call, or the former Soviet Union that is Russia,
Speaker 1: it seemed to me that we might have had an
Speaker 1: opportunity to have a trading partner rather than an arch enemy.
Speaker 1: But we're still some people are still living the Cold War.
Speaker 1: In this situation with fur.
Speaker 4: Saw that, of all people, Richard Nixon when he started
Speaker 4: allowing American manufacturers of stereos washing machines and blue jeans
Speaker 4: to sell their.
Speaker 2: Products in Russia.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and that began the Peristroika, that began the lessening
Speaker 4: of tensions. You wouldn't know that if you listen to
Speaker 4: the neocons today. No, they think we're still fighting the
Speaker 4: Cold War. They think, and they argue that Putin wants
Speaker 4: to take over Europe. All he wants to do is
Speaker 4: lead a country that is prosperous and happy and gradually
Speaker 4: acquiring the freedoms that we've had, and one that is safe,
Speaker 4: one that is not surrounded by a ring of NATO
Speaker 4: weapons aimed at it. So why doesn't putin want NATO
Speaker 4: in ukrained? Well, how would we react if the Chinese
Speaker 4: entered into a treaty with Mexico and put long range
Speaker 4: missiles in Tijuana aimed at Dallas and Chicago.
Speaker 2: You can only imagine how we'd react.
Speaker 1: Then, we lived through that during the Cuban missile crisis,
Speaker 1: your honor. Now, the other component of this is this
Speaker 1: batcrap insanity, if I may be so bold as to
Speaker 1: call it. DA has pushed formerly non Yeah, they didn't
Speaker 1: play well together, China and Russia except what was only
Speaker 1: serve their own best interest, but usually not great friends
Speaker 1: in the great global landscape of the geopolitics. Now they
Speaker 1: are ponied up and embracing each other, doing war games together.
Speaker 1: Joining that the NOI North Koreans who now have a
Speaker 1: defense agreement with Russia, which is crazy given the situation
Speaker 1: in South Korea still exists. There's still that DMZ right there,
Speaker 1: and the Iranians have joined into this fun and game
Speaker 1: supplying weapons to each other. So we have forced a
Speaker 1: coalition of otherwise folks that wouldn't play nicely together at
Speaker 1: least didn't have an interest in it, to coordinate their efforts.
Speaker 1: It's been a monumental disaster.
Speaker 2: You want to talk about money.
Speaker 4: I don't know if Pete Hegseeth is going to become
Speaker 4: the Secretary of Defense, but whoever.
Speaker 2: Is, we'll have close to nine hundred billion to spend.
Speaker 2: That is more than the.
Speaker 4: Next ten nations combined, including Russia, which has a larger
Speaker 4: and better army, and China, which has a larger and
Speaker 4: better navy.
Speaker 2: What are we wasting our money on? Brian?
Speaker 4: I got to say something else before you let me go,
Speaker 4: because I don't know if the public knows this about
Speaker 4: a mutual friend of ours. Yesterday, on the floor of
Speaker 4: the House of Representatives, the House voted down a monstrosity
Speaker 4: called HR nine four nine five No publicity Whatsoever.
Speaker 2: HR nine four ninety five, which Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: Ardently wants, would give the President of the United States
Speaker 4: and him alone, the ability to strip the tax exempt
Speaker 4: status of any organization whose speech he disagrees with introduced
Speaker 4: by the Republicans. One hundred and forty five Democrats and
Speaker 4: one Republican voted no, and it failed because it required
Speaker 4: two thirds vote. The one Republican who voted no knows
Speaker 4: that Donald Trump wants this. He also knows that he
Speaker 4: is under consideration to become the Secretary of Agriculture.
Speaker 1: Thomas.
Speaker 4: When I saw the name of the Republican who voted no,
Speaker 4: my eyes welled up at the personal courage and fidelity
Speaker 4: to first principles of Congressman Thomas Massey, who is second
Speaker 4: to none.
Speaker 1: He does believe in the Constitution, he does understand constitutional rights,
Speaker 1: freedoms and liberties. I'm gonna have to look into that
Speaker 1: bill myself because the way you described it, I'm appalled
Speaker 1: that it could even have been entertained as a concept,
Speaker 1: considering the right to free speech that exists in this country.
Speaker 1: As a founding principal Judge Editor Poltana find him online
Speaker 1: Judging Freedom. You can find it anywhere. Just search for
Speaker 1: Judge of Polatan and Judging Freedom. As we always end
Speaker 1: the segment, your honor, who are you going to have
Speaker 1: on the segments today?
Speaker 4: Oh my goodness, I have a heck of a day
Speaker 4: for me, Ambassador Charles Freeman, Max Blumenthal, Aaron Matte, Colonel
Speaker 4: Douglas McGregor, Phil Giraldi, Professor John Meyer, Scheimer, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson,
Speaker 4: starting at nine, in a few minutes, ending at five
Speaker 4: after dark.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say, ending it more like midnight tonight
Speaker 1: with a lineup like that, Well, we'll be looking for
Speaker 1: you and listening to your conversations again, Judging Freedom. Thanks
Speaker 1: again for the wonderful column. It was just just such
Speaker 1: a nice one two punch after yesterday. Keep up the
Speaker 1: great work. I'll look forward to Wednesday already as I
Speaker 1: always do. Best of health, my friend.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Brian, Bye bye.
Speaker 1: Eight forty one come out of eight forty two here
Speaker 1: fifty five krs. The talk station got a little bit
Speaker 1: more to talk about. If you want to phone up.
Speaker 1: Maybe you get a disagreement, maybe you have an agreement.
Speaker 1: If you can figure it out, I want to hear
Speaker 1: your answer and your solution. Five one, three, seven, four, nine,
Speaker 1: fifty five hundred, eight hundred eight two to three talk
Speaker 1: Pop Fight fifty on AT and T phones. I'll be
Speaker 1: right back. Eighteen million veterans