Speaker 1: Can you dig as god you digs.
Speaker 2: Ladies, gentlemen, friends, pos, lurkers, regulars, GMO people, organic people,
Speaker 2: room in bound.
Speaker 3: Tom.
Speaker 4: All right, let's just bring that right down right here,
Speaker 4: right off the bat. Welcome to the boiler Room. I'm
Speaker 4: your host. My name is Brian McLain. They call me
Speaker 4: Hesher here at the Social Rejects Club. Welcome to this
Speaker 4: live stream. It's September the eighteenth, twenty twenty five. And uh,
Speaker 4: I apologize if there's any confusion about the links to
Speaker 4: the show. We had to sort of reorient ourselves here
Speaker 4: after an error on the broadcast machine. So I think
Speaker 4: we're good to go now. We should be live on YouTube,
Speaker 4: sup YouTube. We should be live on X sup X.
Speaker 4: We should be live on Rumble. What's going on Rumble?
Speaker 4: Good to see it. So this is an American podcast.
Speaker 4: We are from America, and here in America, we got
Speaker 4: everything you need. We got the narrative for you. If
Speaker 4: your narrative is skeptical of Israel, if your narrative is
Speaker 4: anti Zionist, if your narrative is pro Israel, if you
Speaker 4: are a Zionist, if you are a Maga, if you
Speaker 4: are a Trantifa, if you are an antifa, a leftist,
Speaker 4: someone on the right, a Democrat, a Republican I mean
Speaker 4: a libertarian, a DGAF non voter. We got a narrative
Speaker 4: for you right here in America. Isn't it wonderful? Whatever
Speaker 4: it is that you are sort of leaning towards right
Speaker 4: when it comes to worldview, we got that. We got
Speaker 4: something to support your confirmation bias. We got something to
Speaker 4: titillate you, we got something to piss you off. We
Speaker 4: got everything everyone needs. If you want to see XYZ
Speaker 4: group of people lose one of their constitutional rights, there's
Speaker 4: a narrative for you that supports that mindset. If you
Speaker 4: don't want to see anyone lose their constitutional rights, well, well,
Speaker 4: I'm sorry to say you're like me and you're in
Speaker 4: the minority. But this is where we're at. This is
Speaker 4: where we're at. No facts, no figures, no autopsies, no
Speaker 4: usable photographs, no usable video. Lots of theories though, with
Speaker 4: the questionable photographs, the questionable evidence, the questionable videos, and
Speaker 4: the questionable narratives. That's right. This is boiler Room broadcasting
Speaker 4: live at Alternate Current Radio dot com. We're going out
Speaker 4: live streaming right now to X to YouTube and to Rumble,
Speaker 4: and after that out to all the audio podcast platforms,
Speaker 4: and we're very happy you joined us for this broadcast
Speaker 4: and that we somehow made it live. All the links
Speaker 4: I put out are probably done and dusted and screwed up,
Speaker 4: at least the YouTube ones. So there's that. So hopefully
Speaker 4: people on YouTube on the failure to launch version of
Speaker 4: tonight's show have found tonight's stream, give us a shout
Speaker 4: out in the chat. Great to see some of our
Speaker 4: friends in the chat already, yes, yes, yes, very cool,
Speaker 4: very cool. And also in our discord. We do have
Speaker 4: a discord, so you can join us there if you're brave.
Speaker 4: I mean, gosh, I guess people that use discord now
Speaker 4: are under scrutiny yet again, right, Like, what is that
Speaker 4: Gamergate comes to bite us in the ass yet again?
Speaker 4: Echoes of Gamergate, Echoes of nine to eleven, Echoes of JFK,
Speaker 4: echoes of World War two, echoes of all of the
Speaker 4: converging conspiracies, right, and should we even have to be
Speaker 4: in this situation? Will we be in this situation if
Speaker 4: we were a country that, rather than look to divide
Speaker 4: people over identity politics, were one that said, you know what,
Speaker 4: let's bring those identity politics down to this size instead
Speaker 4: of this size. But no, that is apparently not America
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty five. That is apparently not the Atlanticist
Speaker 4: block in twenty twenty five. And if that surprises you, well,
Speaker 4: welcome to the party. You should have figured this out
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one. But that's okay.
Speaker 4: You're still very welcome with us here in the Social
Speaker 4: rejects Club. Speaking of which, let me start bringing in
Speaker 4: tonight's social reject Club. I'm gonna start with Mystical Pharaoh here,
Speaker 4: mystical Pharaoh, our resident scientist, our resident gosh. I don't know,
Speaker 4: mystical Pharaoh. Welcome back to the program. It's great to
Speaker 4: see you man. How you doing. It's been seven days
Speaker 4: since we've been live, and we were live the day
Speaker 4: after the Charlie Kirk murder incident, so we were chopping
Speaker 4: up everything we had at the time. It's now been
Speaker 4: a week. Welcome to the program, man, How you doing.
Speaker 4: How did you fare in the social and mainstream media
Speaker 4: streams this week?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 6: Thanks for having me and great to be here. Well,
Speaker 6: I don't know, and I guess what I expected exactly
Speaker 6: happened storm from the right in the same direction. I
Speaker 6: expected voices pushing for you know, boxing the left and
Speaker 6: attacking them right, and it's left versus right again, right,
Speaker 6: and what's a solution? Pushing for more censorship and destruction
Speaker 6: of our First Amendment. That's what the right is for
Speaker 6: right now. And of course the government is using they
Speaker 6: do what they best can, whether they are whether there's
Speaker 6: a grand conspiracy or not. But they always love to
Speaker 6: use events to push for agendas, right, and we saw
Speaker 6: that transpiring this week. And I don't know, it's a
Speaker 6: I guess once you see, once you get unplugged from
Speaker 6: the matrix, you start seeing the code and you can
Speaker 6: see the events before they happen. And I guess my
Speaker 6: filter is pretty good because just what they expect to happen.
Speaker 4: Yep, I know what you mean. We even have listeners
Speaker 4: that have similar filters. There's Ban what's up? Ban had
Speaker 4: a premonition, you guys were a live you called it?
Speaker 4: Man you're on that hasher wavelength when it comes to timing. Absolutely,
Speaker 4: and a lot of synchronicity is happening. I'm noticing a
Speaker 4: lot of people very tuned in to coincidence. Is synchronicities
Speaker 4: and stuff like that, and I think that is sort
Speaker 4: of a zegeist thing. This might be a little woo
Speaker 4: woo for some, but I think that's sort of a
Speaker 4: zegeist thing. After an event like this, people, when everybody's
Speaker 4: questioning everything, there's like an elevated sort of you know
Speaker 4: milleu if you will.
Speaker 3: Oh, absolutely.
Speaker 6: So, aside from the menia right from everybody. I think
Speaker 6: once a few days after things settled, you can start
Speaker 6: seeing some people questioning, right, But also you start seeing
Speaker 6: some other factions spreading misinformation and you know, propaganda to
Speaker 6: discredit anybody or any actually anyone that is trying to
Speaker 6: seek the truth, which again is a playbook move right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's what they always do.
Speaker 6: Create chaos, have a bullshit narrative from the government or officials.
Speaker 6: That's what happened in Vegas, That's what happened in the
Speaker 6: Paul shooting. That's what happens with so many other incidents.
Speaker 6: And this is no different. They got someone an old
Speaker 6: dude that now I guess he's being charged with show
Speaker 6: pornography somehow, okay, yeah, uh, And then the TRANSTENTTIFA came
Speaker 6: out and and and now you know, the the fairy community.
Speaker 3: Is the new evil.
Speaker 4: So hilarious, dude, like talk about the talk about the
Speaker 4: least threatening group of people in the country, and everybody's like,
Speaker 4: oh no, oh, they're coming to get us.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and I guess it's all happening in discords, right,
Speaker 6: So that's uh, that's uh, that's why the government has
Speaker 6: to start monitoring discord. And yeah, it's it's not that
Speaker 6: the scord was already full of Feds and like people
Speaker 6: actually inciting bullshit.
Speaker 4: Right, slightly less than four Chan, but yes, anyway, oh man, okay, yeah.
Speaker 3: We'll save some of that for the show.
Speaker 4: Yeah, well, we'll have a lot to look at tonight.
Speaker 4: Let me bring Ruckus aboard here. Hopefully he's uh completed
Speaker 4: the mess I made as far as notifications and updates. Ruckus,
Speaker 4: Welcome back to the boiler room. What's uh, what's what's
Speaker 4: your subtitle? Tonight?
Speaker 3: C A j I.
Speaker 7: That's KAGI. It's a throwback to Bill Cooper the Citizens
Speaker 7: Agency for Joint Intelligence, I believe. Okay, yeah, yeah, classic stuff.
Speaker 7: I hope I got the anacronym right there. I think
Speaker 7: I did. I'm bad with those anacronyms, but yeah, that's Kagi.
Speaker 7: That was Bill Cooper's outfit, that the independent journalists who
Speaker 7: actually did their research and proved things for themselves and
Speaker 7: documented it. You know, remember that.
Speaker 3: I know.
Speaker 7: That's it's all.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 7: I was going to say, it's all far too much work.
Speaker 7: We don't need to do that anymore. We have X,
Speaker 7: we have GROC, we have chat GPT. Speaking of X,
Speaker 7: thank god for X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
Speaker 7: If it was not for them, I would have no
Speaker 7: idea that I should be absolutely frightened to my core
Speaker 7: of the scariest thing on the planet hasher, which, of
Speaker 7: course are the transgender terror cells from my ran which
Speaker 7: have infiltrated this country. And I don't know what to
Speaker 7: do with this, dude, I'm scared shitless of the queer resistance,
Speaker 7: and I just I don't should I just give up
Speaker 7: all my rights?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 7: How do I fix this? What do I do? Do
Speaker 7: I put? How many masks do I have to wear
Speaker 7: to prevent myself from having to deal with this? I
Speaker 7: just these are the questions I have, my friend.
Speaker 4: The whole box, I mean, where the whole box of masks?
Speaker 4: Pile them out as far as doctor clown, would you
Speaker 4: know approve so was that fifty hundred of them put
Speaker 4: them all on it once. We may as well put
Speaker 4: blinders on while we're at it, like good horses or something.
Speaker 4: But hey, at least, you know, I don't know, I
Speaker 4: don't know if there's such thing as a silver lining
Speaker 4: at this point, but at least everybody is recognizing that
Speaker 4: nothing makes sense, So maybe that's a slight silver lining.
Speaker 7: Well, you know those dodgy little text messages that they
Speaker 7: released recently, certainly helping.
Speaker 4: The text messages. Oh my god, Yeah, we're gonna get
Speaker 4: there for sure. Let me bring sport in. Let's get
Speaker 4: some ice broken. Here go in to introduce the one,
Speaker 4: the only, the very lovely and keeper of all things
Speaker 4: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot on the interwebs. Lovely Spore, Welcome back
Speaker 4: to the boiler room. How you doing tonight?
Speaker 5: I'm doing pretty good considering the environment of the world.
Speaker 5: Happy to be here.
Speaker 4: Yeah, great to have you. All right, let's uh no,
Speaker 4: not that, let's break some ice. What do you got
Speaker 4: to kick us off with tonight's spot?
Speaker 5: Well, this one is brought to us from al my neck?
Speaker 5: What up, pops?
Speaker 4: Uh my neck?
Speaker 5: This is from Zero Edge. The title is.
Speaker 8: Dystopian toilets won't give you toilet paper unless you sit
Speaker 8: through an advertisement or pay up. So basically this is
Speaker 8: originally comes from China Insider, and there's there's some video.
Speaker 8: I haven't caught it yet, but there are toilets that
Speaker 8: will only give you two plies of toilet paper.
Speaker 5: If you want an AD or which I think.
Speaker 8: You can scan a QR code for the AD, or
Speaker 8: you you pay for the two flies of toilet paper.
Speaker 4: Pay you pay for toilet paper in what is a.
Speaker 5: Nickel? So like who has a nickel on them?
Speaker 8: Like? Or I guess you just have to use your
Speaker 8: credit card pay, Like if you're.
Speaker 5: What if you had mud butt in public, you know,
Speaker 5: maybe need more than two flies.
Speaker 4: Even if you don't have mud butt, you might need
Speaker 4: more than two flies. Come on, man, this is crazy.
Speaker 5: It's crazy.
Speaker 8: I was thinking about it, and I was like, I'm
Speaker 8: I go to public restrooms, you know, I try to
Speaker 8: avoid them, but sometimes you're in the grocery store or
Speaker 8: whatever you need to take a wiz or whatever. And
Speaker 8: I'm pretty sure here in America, with our freedom, we
Speaker 8: could even like I could stuff one of those those
Speaker 8: toilet paper rolls in my bag but like having them
Speaker 8: like restricted by advertisements for money.
Speaker 4: Wow, And this is of course China. Everybody okay, so
Speaker 4: but you can dang well bet they'll be using that
Speaker 4: we chat app or whatever. That is the sort of
Speaker 4: Chinese analog sort of the inspiration to Elon Musk's Everything
Speaker 4: X being everything right, could you imagine being here in America? Like,
Speaker 4: say you're in a BUCkies all right? For my Texans
Speaker 4: and Floridians and people that live in states that are
Speaker 4: lucky enough to have a BUCkies, say you're in the
Speaker 4: BUCkies and you got to drop a deuce and you
Speaker 4: go into the nicest bathroom in Texas, public bathroom in Texas.
Speaker 4: You do the thing, and then you've faced with a
Speaker 4: QR code that you have to use your ex app
Speaker 4: and some doge coin to pay for a couple of squares.
Speaker 5: Well not just that, but yeah, there's that, but also
Speaker 5: what if.
Speaker 8: What if it doesn't take as it's not as short
Speaker 8: of a trip as usual, you're just sitting there like
Speaker 8: watch a bunch of ads in a public bathroom.
Speaker 5: Skull.
Speaker 3: That's not the problem.
Speaker 6: The problem with you scan the QR code and it
Speaker 6: goes to your ex profile and you you criticize Israel.
Speaker 6: You have you don't get toilet paper, and you have
Speaker 6: to leave with a dirty butt because you're not toilet paper.
Speaker 4: Oh that I was.
Speaker 8: I was chatting with Jack CHADBT about this because I
Speaker 8: was hoping that it could give me some funny lines.
Speaker 8: But honestly, I think I'm funnier than chat GPT at
Speaker 8: this point always. But it was like, it's the new
Speaker 8: paper view for.
Speaker 5: For ticking a dump.
Speaker 4: Paper pooh paper pooh.
Speaker 5: Well I came up with that one.
Speaker 4: That would have been a good alternative show title. Wow,
Speaker 4: this reminds me of the I believe it's maybe the
Speaker 4: very first or second episode season one of Black Mirror, where,
Speaker 4: of course, like all Black Mirror episodes, this is a
Speaker 4: near future dystopia scenario and people live in little coom
Speaker 4: pods and their entire walls, all four walls are television screens,
Speaker 4: and they have to get up in the morning and
Speaker 4: they have to ride this little like bicycle, right, like
Speaker 4: a stationary bicycle, which generates its power of some sort.
Speaker 4: So the humans being used as batteries all on matrix
Speaker 4: and when they are done with their day, you know,
Speaker 4: earning coins and whatnot and trying to get on reality television,
Speaker 4: they go back to their little compod, and in their compod,
Speaker 4: they are forced to watch pornography and commercials on all
Speaker 4: four walls that they live in, and the only way
Speaker 4: to not do that is to pay shekels, to pay
Speaker 4: digital credits, to pay the you know, little bits of
Speaker 4: digital money that they earn by riding the bicycle all
Speaker 4: day so that they do not have to watch pornography.
Speaker 8: Yeah, so that was exactly what it reminded me of.
Speaker 8: And I'm pretty sure it's episode one of season one Likes,
Speaker 8: so it is. But yeah, it's like you have to
Speaker 8: sit there on a bike and get to a certain
Speaker 8: number if you don't want to be like surrounded. It's
Speaker 8: like ads and porn if I remember correctly.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, the ads were for like the big reality
Speaker 4: TV show. If I recall, it's been a while since
Speaker 4: we've watched it, but there's like a big, you know,
Speaker 4: reality TV show. It's sort of like the Plubs, only
Speaker 4: the Surf's only way the surf slash Plubs only way
Speaker 4: off the hamster wheel that they live on. And then
Speaker 4: you know, the main character in that episode discovers what
Speaker 4: it's like to be a influencer basically like he becomes
Speaker 4: a reality TV personality slash influencer. It's all you know,
Speaker 4: And that came out what twenty fifteen. That episode's like
Speaker 4: ten years old now, so here it is right here
Speaker 4: in China, as reported by zero Hedge. I guess only
Speaker 4: two squares, so you're paying for two squares or you're
Speaker 4: watching some ads for the rest of it. I imagine most
Speaker 4: people will just watch the ads. I mean, how different
Speaker 4: is that then what most people do on the toilet Anyways,
Speaker 4: these days they.
Speaker 5: Go in there, how much time you got and what
Speaker 5: you got to do in there?
Speaker 4: And how many credits you got, right, how many digital
Speaker 4: credits you got? You might be saving up for your uh,
Speaker 4: you know, your next TIMU purchase or your next letboo
Speaker 4: boo doll.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 8: Well, I mean it could be like you know, three
Speaker 8: Waves on Texas where you could just like bank ahead
Speaker 8: of time and be like, I'm putting fifty bucks in
Speaker 8: there because I'm going to be traveling a lot and
Speaker 8: I'm gonna have to take travel shits.
Speaker 4: Travel shits all right, ruckus. What do you think?
Speaker 2: Man?
Speaker 4: This is not a good sign?
Speaker 7: No, are they?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 7: I mean, would they be able to get away with
Speaker 7: this during another p word if there was a shortage
Speaker 7: of the stuff, I mean, price gouging.
Speaker 8: Yeah, well, I mean that's kind of like what they
Speaker 8: were saying in the article was that it's let me
Speaker 8: see if I can find it real quick.
Speaker 5: But it's basically they claim this set up curbs waist.
Speaker 7: Okay, that's what it's about. This is to save the
Speaker 7: planet thing.
Speaker 8: Yeah, so people are wiping excessive amounts.
Speaker 5: Of free toilet paper, and I.
Speaker 7: Don't know, I just ridiculous. You see what happens people,
Speaker 7: You give them an inch and they take your toilet paper.
Speaker 7: See they take your two play ridiculous. Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 7: Well Jesus, yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 8: I remember back in the day when I was like,
Speaker 8: I mean, I just thought it was kind of like shocking.
Speaker 8: Like I'm talking like nineties, early two thousands, when it
Speaker 8: was like to me kind of like weird that the
Speaker 8: only thing that you could get for free from a
Speaker 8: gas station was matches.
Speaker 5: And now I'm like, thank the Lord for toilet paper.
Speaker 7: Well, I mean, when's the last time you saw a
Speaker 7: penny laying around on the ground.
Speaker 4: Yeah, And tpe's one of those things that here in America,
Speaker 4: everybody just completely felt like was ubiquitous, a no big
Speaker 4: deal before COVID, Like COVID was the first time in
Speaker 4: this country, at least in my lifetime, where all of
Speaker 4: a sudden that became a coveted resource, something that was
Speaker 4: hard to find. I mean the same could be said
Speaker 4: for eggs and other stuff. Look at that we've got.
Speaker 4: I flee some chief banker here with us. What's going on?
Speaker 4: I flee them?
Speaker 1: Interest payments, my friend, interest payments. I'm swimming in dough.
Speaker 1: The blood of the slaves is my ele.
Speaker 4: Sir, What do we owe you this week to not
Speaker 4: have to pay for every two squares of toilet paper
Speaker 4: that we use out publicly?
Speaker 1: Three trillion every two seconds?
Speaker 4: All right, we're writing a check. We'll see if it
Speaker 4: pat We'll see if it clears. Hey man, great to
Speaker 4: have you. You joined in the middle of the ice
Speaker 4: breaker here. The icebreaker tonight is coming out of zero Hedge,
Speaker 4: and it's out of China, and it's called distow pe
Speaker 4: in toilets won't give you toilet paper unless you sit
Speaker 4: through an advertisement or pay up. So in China, out
Speaker 4: of China, Insider, we're seeing reports spore brought this to
Speaker 4: the show. Al My next submitted it to her channel
Speaker 4: there in our discord, which you should join if you're
Speaker 4: not in their alternate current Radio dot com as The
Speaker 4: website invite is in the main menu. But Mark, can
Speaker 4: you imagine that? Like I was using the example of
Speaker 4: could you imagine if this came to America and you
Speaker 4: were in Texas and you went into a Bucky's. You know,
Speaker 4: nicest bathrooms in Texas? Right, They're always clean, There are
Speaker 4: plenty of spacious, they're private, they have big thick walls
Speaker 4: between you and the person next to you. But could
Speaker 4: you imagine seeing this on the wall? When you go
Speaker 4: to grab a couple plies of the old TP, you
Speaker 4: can either watch an ad or you can pay use
Speaker 4: your cell phone to pay for two plies of TP.
Speaker 1: I think the way I'd rectify the problem would be
Speaker 1: I would abscond with a beverage from the cooler, take
Speaker 1: it inside the stall, and drink the beverage. And you know,
Speaker 1: once it's gone, the evidence has disappeared that you ever
Speaker 1: had the beverage. Throw the can away, So I get
Speaker 1: a free beverage for watching the ad, and that free
Speaker 1: beverage is worth more than what I would put in
Speaker 1: the toilet dispenser. So I come out ahead as I
Speaker 1: flease the.
Speaker 5: That's a great plan for the number one.
Speaker 1: As only I flee. Some could could do.
Speaker 5: But what about a number two?
Speaker 1: What are you gonna do?
Speaker 3: Then?
Speaker 1: Well, that could mean two coffee drinks. I like the
Speaker 1: energy coffee drink.
Speaker 4: A five hour energy, a starbuck expresso, you know.
Speaker 1: Especially at Bucki's. Can you swear on the show? Can
Speaker 1: you use?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that. I don't know what it is when I
Speaker 1: see that little what do you worship?
Speaker 4: Monk the beaver?
Speaker 1: He's a beaver. I don't know why I say I
Speaker 1: call him fuckhead. I said, look, there's fuckhead. I've named
Speaker 1: for that, and I have no explanation for why I
Speaker 1: want to call him fuckhead. But like I was going
Speaker 1: from Houston to sagein not long ago, and there's a
Speaker 1: huge BUCkies there on I ten and I go, look, aree,
Speaker 1: there's there's fucking's place and there's like thirty five gas pumps.
Speaker 4: Oh dude, twice that I counted once. We have seventy
Speaker 4: eight at the one here in Temple.
Speaker 1: Yeah, how can a banker underestimate that? I don't know
Speaker 1: but we in principle, I would drink the beverage value
Speaker 1: beyond what I'd put into that and take my chances.
Speaker 4: See, we're all about solutions here in the boiler room.
Speaker 4: I mean that's.
Speaker 7: What voices like, what what the drink has to do
Speaker 7: with the toilet paper? Did I miss that part?
Speaker 1: Well, I would kill time drinking the drink, and the
Speaker 1: value of the drink would be more than what I'd
Speaker 1: put in the toilet paper dispenser.
Speaker 5: So whatever you drink, it might make you go to
Speaker 5: the bathroom quicker.
Speaker 1: Well, that's that's that's a that's the thought too, you know.
Speaker 1: Or it could be in the form of a snack,
Speaker 1: you know, like a twinkie or something.
Speaker 7: Well, here's the other problem is that you need a
Speaker 7: phone to engage with the toilet paper. That's that's the
Speaker 7: other that's the piece that is the problem for for like,
Speaker 7: that's crazy to me that like you can't like because
Speaker 7: in order to interact with the toilet paper dispenser you
Speaker 7: need to scan the QR code. I am I'm just
Speaker 7: pretty much pretty sure that's how you also watch the ads,
Speaker 7: So then you get to choose to watch the ad
Speaker 7: on your phone or you're paying with your phone. It
Speaker 7: didn't look to me like that the AD is gonna
Speaker 7: pop up in the form of like a hologram shooting
Speaker 7: out of the side of the wall or whatever. Right,
Speaker 7: so you need a you need a cell phone.
Speaker 3: I think there you go.
Speaker 8: Okay, maybe people comply to this and in China or
Speaker 8: where you know where they're rolling this out at, But
Speaker 8: I think here in Texas there would be a lot
Speaker 8: of messy bathroom stalls.
Speaker 1: Oh god, because.
Speaker 8: Some people are just gonna be like fuck you, like
Speaker 8: I'm not paying or watching an ad to do this.
Speaker 1: Like I think they'd find the dispenser is broken and
Speaker 1: thrown away in the most unlikely places.
Speaker 4: Oh, there you go. We could do. We could go
Speaker 4: with some some public disobedience here, and not that we
Speaker 4: not that we condone vandalizing anyone else's property. But I
Speaker 4: would not be surprised if these things were deployed here
Speaker 4: and ended up like a lot of the cameras in
Speaker 4: the UK, just you know, desecrated by the local civilians
Speaker 4: who are saying, no, thanks, we don't need these.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they can burn a five G tower, we can
Speaker 1: at least remove a Chinese Well, what could be a Chinese.
Speaker 1: Probably a Chinese made toilet paper dispass. It would probably
Speaker 1: be made in China. And then if it's written in Chinese,
Speaker 1: then all bets are off. It's coming off the wall
Speaker 1: and it's going in the trash.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's not gonna fly here in Texas. Mark, there's
Speaker 4: no way. I mean, the TP tax. Are you kidding me?
Speaker 4: This is the country that said no to a tax
Speaker 4: on tea. I don't know that we are that country
Speaker 4: anymore because we's apparently just let anything fly nout. But yeah,
Speaker 4: at least here in Texas and other places. I don't
Speaker 4: know why we're picking on BUCkies here. I mean, but
Speaker 4: there's only a few states that have BUCkies in them,
Speaker 4: So sorry to all of you that don't have them.
Speaker 4: But yeah, you know. Bana Hammer asked a great question.
Speaker 4: How about a number three? Oh yeah, we're escalating here.
Speaker 4: If you're in the number threes and for us, and
Speaker 4: you're gonna need that kind of two ply action. Stay home,
Speaker 4: stay home, Yeah yeah, don't get in a swimming pool
Speaker 4: for two weeks, stay home.
Speaker 1: Threes and fours? What do you mean?
Speaker 4: I think that's an escalating scale there, Mark, So you've
Speaker 4: got your typical number one, your number two. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: we don't need to mutas.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was doing the then Okay, yeah, what is it?
Speaker 4: Nope? Nope, good god? All right, Well, unless anyone has
Speaker 4: any other comments on that, we'll move on to more
Speaker 4: serious business. Number one, number two, number three, Okay, moving on, just.
Speaker 1: To say, civil disobedience would find a good home in
Speaker 1: that that would yeah, long gone before they knew anything happened.
Speaker 1: You'd be long gone down the road.
Speaker 4: Talk about something that's unenforceable too. I mean, our cops
Speaker 4: really going to be like pulling people over ten miles
Speaker 4: away going you didn't pay? Are you my two dollars
Speaker 4: for those two plies?
Speaker 8: I mean, come on, I mean, realistically, I think that
Speaker 8: people would just start carrying rolls.
Speaker 5: Of toilet paper in there, like backpacks or purses.
Speaker 4: Right, they make camping toilet papers that don't have the
Speaker 4: like you know, cardboard thing in the middle. It's like
Speaker 4: half the size, but just as many plies. Yeah, you
Speaker 4: can throw one of those in your in your cargo
Speaker 4: pocket or your purse or whatever.
Speaker 1: You should have that anyway, in a state as big
Speaker 1: as Texas, you should have a few rolls in there.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah, a couple of gallons of water and a
Speaker 4: couple of rolls of TP.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the most indestructible food in the world peanut butter
Speaker 1: or jar that goes a long ways.
Speaker 4: Peanut butter jerky TP nine milimeters rounds. That's how we
Speaker 4: roll here in Texas.
Speaker 1: That's it man, all right.
Speaker 4: Well, thanks on my neck for submitting that. Thank you
Speaker 4: SPOR for selecting and presenting. It wonderful to see how
Speaker 4: bad things are going in China because you know, America
Speaker 4: doesn't want to fall behind China, do we do We No,
Speaker 4: we don't want to fall behind China. I mean, if
Speaker 4: they're doing mRNA, we should do mRNA. If they're doing
Speaker 4: you know, pay for pay for poop, we should do
Speaker 4: pay for poop, right like we should have that for
Speaker 4: our citizens. We don't want them to eclipse us or
Speaker 4: do anything you know that we can't do here. We
Speaker 4: can't have that.
Speaker 1: Toilet tyranny could be very lucrative, you know, for the
Speaker 1: Deep State.
Speaker 4: And wouldn't that be the perfect like humiliative, like ritual
Speaker 4: way to screw people over like in the United States
Speaker 4: if you really wanted to take it down to the
Speaker 4: you know, a dirtier level, just straight to number two
Speaker 4: and three if you're having a bad day. Mm hmm, yeah,
Speaker 4: all right, all right, anybody else you further come.
Speaker 7: Up lost those devices? You just know they have a
Speaker 7: camera in them.
Speaker 4: Oh no, oh, you're right. Pretty much anything that looks
Speaker 4: like like this here, let me put it on the
Speaker 4: screen again. You know this has a camera in it.
Speaker 4: We were just out uh recently with Ruckus uh Spoor
Speaker 4: and I looking at a device that looked kind of
Speaker 4: similar to that sitting on a dinner table. You could
Speaker 4: order your drinks with it, you could pay your tab
Speaker 4: with it. Didn't look very different.
Speaker 7: Than not get toilet paper from it?
Speaker 4: Did not get toilet paper out of it? Does it?
Speaker 4: Does the toilet paper come right out of it? Does
Speaker 4: it dispense from there? Or like how do they?
Speaker 7: Very strange, isn't it?
Speaker 4: Like what kind of toilet paper dispenser hardware technology are
Speaker 4: we talking about here that you can't get in.
Speaker 7: That different kind of toilet paper It comes out like
Speaker 7: a little ticker.
Speaker 4: Tape, Like really, I can't just get in there because
Speaker 4: in America you could, like even if you've ever been
Speaker 4: in one of those public bathrooms where like you know,
Speaker 4: the toilet paper is like in this big, you know,
Speaker 4: plastic shroud and you have to like reach your hand
Speaker 4: up in there and like spin it a few times
Speaker 4: to get a square out, you know, to it started.
Speaker 4: Let's to stop me from doing that in the Chinese one.
Speaker 1: One thing that would I think be very effective without
Speaker 1: getting in front of it where it can see you
Speaker 1: as just one good strip of duct tape right down
Speaker 1: the middle of it, and you would disarm the whole thing.
Speaker 1: I think it would just be like a satellite tumbling
Speaker 1: through space. You're done, Yeah, you won the fight.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean when TP is the is the prize
Speaker 4: from the fight and you've had to you know, do
Speaker 4: a two or three, God forbid of four.
Speaker 1: But in my rock and roll days, we called an
Speaker 1: Alabama chrome chrome.
Speaker 4: You should write a song called that.
Speaker 1: That's it?
Speaker 4: Oh man? All right, well, let's get off the pot
Speaker 4: here and see if we can't chop up the last
Speaker 4: seven days of media. So Mark, you weren't able to
Speaker 4: join us last week, Charlie Kirk was murdered in a
Speaker 4: very public fashion in front of everybody. At least that's
Speaker 4: the mainstream narrative that we are seeing. We have listeners
Speaker 4: asking us to discuss a lot of the various theories
Speaker 4: out there, to include the deepest, darkest one, which is
Speaker 4: that maybe it didn't even happen, but it did happen
Speaker 4: in front of all our eyes, and we're just curious
Speaker 4: about all of that. I have no agenda tonight. I
Speaker 4: have no notes tonight. I simply wanted to go around
Speaker 4: the room, see what everybody's thinking, play any clips or
Speaker 4: things that anybody drops us, and see where we're at.
Speaker 4: I think, as far as I can say, nothing is
Speaker 4: real right now, I don't know what I can look
Speaker 4: at in this situation and say that is real. I'm struggling.
Speaker 4: I mean I can look and say that narrative that
Speaker 4: I'm seeing from the government is the narrative of the
Speaker 4: government is giving us. These alternative narratives, many fold on
Speaker 4: social media, are a narrative I can look towards. There
Speaker 4: are a lot of pieces of evidence towards most of
Speaker 4: these narratives. But in the end, if you're using journalistic practices,
Speaker 4: I'm going to go to I Flee some first here
Speaker 4: because he's our journalist. If you're using journalistic practices, mark
Speaker 4: tell us what can be gained when you put your
Speaker 4: journalistic Sherlock Holmes spectacles on and you remove all emotion
Speaker 4: from it, and you look at what you've seen over
Speaker 4: the last seven days, eight days to include the day
Speaker 4: that Charlie Kirk was murdered. What do you think about
Speaker 4: what you've seen so far? And is there any theory
Speaker 4: out there that you think is more viable than another theory?
Speaker 4: And just more broadly, what do you make of the
Speaker 4: environment that we have in the day after the event?
Speaker 1: Well, starting with the detective mode, the detective mode of thinking,
Speaker 1: which is a mode of thinking that a lot of
Speaker 1: alternative journalists tend to kind of avoid, even though I
Speaker 1: think it's the most important one to start with when
Speaker 1: you can not that I've watched this every day, Not
Speaker 1: that I was ever a big Charlie Kirk fan. I
Speaker 1: kind of lumped him in with Ben Shapiro and Nick
Speaker 1: Fuentes as this sort of young so called leaders of
Speaker 1: the alternative media. At least that's how they fancy themselves,
Speaker 1: with all their financing sources that are sometimes very large
Speaker 1: and not always altogether clear where they're getting their money
Speaker 1: or how all that being said, there's a guy that
Speaker 1: doesn't show his face real often. He used to do
Speaker 1: some videos called a call for an uprising, and now
Speaker 1: it's called hive mind Nation, beehive, hive my Nation. And
Speaker 1: he did a video that I happened to play some
Speaker 1: clips from today on my RBN show Stop the Presses
Speaker 1: at Republic Broadcasting dot org. And I just put it
Speaker 1: out there as a what if I didn't have any
Speaker 1: definitive like you said, no agenda. I have a cousin
Speaker 1: named no Agenda haha. But the thing that was brought
Speaker 1: out on his video Hive My Nation, was that there
Speaker 1: was never a quarterned off or a police taped crime scene,
Speaker 1: and that the crime scene evidently was compromised and contaminated
Speaker 1: right away. So if this was a high profile shooting
Speaker 1: of a high profile person, why wouldn't there be like
Speaker 1: with any other shooting. If my neighbor got shot, if
Speaker 1: I got shot, if the mayor got shot, there'd be
Speaker 1: the crime scene tape and no one would be allowed
Speaker 1: to move anything, touch anything. Evidently those prohibitions did not
Speaker 1: take effect. Again, I didn't watch this every day, day
Speaker 1: in and day out. I didn't want to be all
Speaker 1: kirked out on this. But the commonplace things that police
Speaker 1: do apparently were very lacking or non existent. That is
Speaker 1: a red flag of sorts, and without getting emotionally invested
Speaker 1: in it, like you mentioned Hesher, Sometimes you have to
Speaker 1: just look at something like, Okay, prove to me this
Speaker 1: happened the way that you tell that. You're telling me
Speaker 1: it happened, and then we can go from there. There
Speaker 1: did seem to be a lack of blood with him
Speaker 1: wearing a white shirt and purely white shoes. Again, I
Speaker 1: wasn't there. I didn't have the perfect vantage point, although
Speaker 1: some of the video footage seemed to be a pretty
Speaker 1: good vantage point. It was curious that they mentioned that
Speaker 1: the gun may have been a German mouser. Where have
Speaker 1: we heard that before? Well, way back in Dallas when
Speaker 1: the JFK affair happened, the JFK incident, the initial announcement
Speaker 1: was they found a German mauser on the sixth floor
Speaker 1: of the Texas school Book Depository. And it was like, oh, wow,
Speaker 1: the mauser's back when I heard about that, and then
Speaker 1: correct me if I'm wrong, But they apparently showed that
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk got shot about here right on his left
Speaker 1: neck or what was that right?
Speaker 5: Hash?
Speaker 4: Yeah, Yeah, that's approximately correct.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Now that's a thirty out six German Mauser. That's
Speaker 1: a powerful rifle. You would not want to be on
Speaker 1: the receiving end of that gun. And I can't see
Speaker 1: how the bullet wouldn't go through him. But it didn't
Speaker 1: if I'm not mistaken, for that bullet to just stay
Speaker 1: unless maybe some kind of weakened round or smaller caliber
Speaker 1: round was used. But I don't know if they're still
Speaker 1: claiming that that thirty out six Mauser was the gun.
Speaker 1: Are they still saying that was the weapon?
Speaker 4: Do you know? I'm a little confused about that myself,
Speaker 4: because I've seen some people saying it was a Springfield.
Speaker 4: I've seen other people saying it was a Mauser. I
Speaker 4: believe Springfield has a rifle that they've made that's based
Speaker 4: on the Mauser. I have a video I'm gonna play
Speaker 4: a little bit later that shows someone breaking down this
Speaker 4: particular rifle that is the same or similar to the
Speaker 4: Mauser that was shown in that one photograph. But I mean,
Speaker 4: even when JFK was shot, that rifle was more than
Speaker 4: fifty years old. Now rifles have a lifespan of way
Speaker 4: more than fifty years when it comes to you know,
Speaker 4: design and implementation. But you look at the picture of
Speaker 4: that rifle, which I linked on last week's show page.
Speaker 4: If you haven't seen it yet, you can find that
Speaker 4: picture in last week's boiler Room show page at Alternate
Speaker 4: Current Radio dot com. But it's not set up in
Speaker 4: a way and there's all this, Okay, let me finish
Speaker 4: my thought. It's not set up in a way that
Speaker 4: a professional or a hunter or you know, anyone who
Speaker 4: used it regularly would set it up. The scope was
Speaker 4: too far back, and the rings looked like it would
Speaker 4: punch you in the eye when the shot broke. And
Speaker 4: there was all this weird talk from Cash Patel about
Speaker 4: how that was grandfather's rifle and grandfather wanted to know
Speaker 4: where it was, you know, all the time, or something
Speaker 4: weird like that. So, you know, and like, I don't
Speaker 4: mean to dive right into all the anomalies right away,
Speaker 4: because I think that most of them are just talking points. Now,
Speaker 4: there's no proof of any of them. There's not even
Speaker 4: a crappy photo of the so called engraved bullet casings.
Speaker 4: But the whole narrative is really hard to accept for
Speaker 4: a lot of people, because the narrative is that it
Speaker 4: was a mouser, a thirty Mauser and that whoever shot it,
Speaker 4: if it was that suspect, broke it down, put the
Speaker 4: barrel in their pants or in the backpack, and the
Speaker 4: receiver in the backpack, jumped off the building, ran into
Speaker 4: the woods, put it back together for unknown reasons, stopped
Speaker 4: and texted his Trantifa boyfriend about like what he was
Speaker 4: doing with the rifle and all this stuff, and said
Speaker 4: that he left it in a towel in the woods,
Speaker 4: and the FEDS and the law enforcement they didn't tell
Speaker 4: us who found it. As far as I know, we
Speaker 4: don't know who exactly found it, what the circumstances were.
Speaker 4: But we just have this one like still frame of
Speaker 4: a mouser I think it's a Mauser, oh boy, with
Speaker 4: the scope not quite on right. And I've got a
Speaker 4: video that shows exactly how long it takes someone who
Speaker 4: has owned this rifle for a long time to break
Speaker 4: it down. So we'll play that at some point tonight.
Speaker 1: Let me add just a little more, given what you
Speaker 1: just said, it becomes more unbelievable as you break it down.
Speaker 1: So the only saying, the only really logical position to
Speaker 1: take is that of total neutrality, that yes, you can
Speaker 1: tell me he was assassinated, but I don't have enough
Speaker 1: data to say that that's absolutely true, so you have
Speaker 1: to be kind of neutral. In other words, it should
Speaker 1: be more fully investigated. But if they completely obliterated the
Speaker 1: crime scene, which evidently they did, then you know, that
Speaker 1: does show forethought and organization behind obscuring what happened. And
Speaker 1: so then the action is in the reaction. So whether
Speaker 1: it was faked or not, then the question to ask
Speaker 1: is why did this happen at all? Fake or not fake?
Speaker 1: And the actions in the reaction. You know, so they
Speaker 1: want people to retreat to their ideological camps and apparently
Speaker 1: try and stir up enough friction amongst the people to
Speaker 1: start sort of a you know, budding civil war kind
Speaker 1: of mentality. I don't think it's going to happen, but
Speaker 1: they definitely are trying to shatter any camaraderie or unity
Speaker 1: Americans were developing, and I think I think the American
Speaker 1: people were beginning to read off the same page a
Speaker 1: little bit more. The covidocracy did a lot to kind
Speaker 1: of galvanize people to look across ideological lines and say, hey,
Speaker 1: you know, we all have a right to free choice
Speaker 1: in healthcare and not to be coerced into taking anything medical,
Speaker 1: including vaccines. So I think that they had to kind
Speaker 1: of re shatter the glass, as it were, and come
Speaker 1: up with something that would get us potentially fighting amongst
Speaker 1: each other, whether it was real or not. And I
Speaker 1: don't think it's going to work. They're going to the
Speaker 1: media is going to make a big deal if there's
Speaker 1: a squabble or a fight at a university, or if
Speaker 1: some if some melee breaks out here or there. They're
Speaker 1: going to make it sound bigger than it really is.
Speaker 1: But you know, the thing to watch is what don't
Speaker 1: they want us to look at. Well, they're exercise Pegasus
Speaker 1: in the UK. They're going to do another pandemic UK
Speaker 1: nationwide exercise. We got the Pandemic Treaty, the International Health REGs,
Speaker 1: the strong potential for another breakout and pandemic and crackdown.
Speaker 1: And maybe there's other things too that we can think
Speaker 1: of that they want to take our eyes off of.
Speaker 1: And therefore they would exploit either a real or not
Speaker 1: so real shooting of Charlie Kirk. That would be the
Speaker 1: quick way of assessing it without without going too heavy
Speaker 1: in any one direction.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, it's it's just gotten completely insane in the
Speaker 4: I don't know what do you call that. I guess
Speaker 4: the top tier, the s tier of mainstream podcasters. You know,
Speaker 4: you're Tucker Carlson, your Candice Owens, your Nick Fuintes, you're
Speaker 4: Megan Kelly, right, and then you've got everybody at r
Speaker 4: a V, everybody at Real America's Voice, you know, Steve
Speaker 4: Bannon being the sort of flagship show there. You've got
Speaker 4: other people there like Eric Bolinger or Bowland. I don't
Speaker 4: know that guy. So it's been really interesting to kind
Speaker 4: of watch a lot of the riv material the because
Speaker 4: we've had what we've had, like Marco Rubio. I heard
Speaker 4: Marco Rubio was hosting in place of Charlie Kirk. I
Speaker 4: heard jd Vance was going to be there in his seat.
Speaker 4: You know. So, like we're in a situation now that
Speaker 4: we've never this is unprecedented. I have to just pause
Speaker 4: everything that we're on right now and say, this is
Speaker 4: unprecedented to have members of the presidential cabinet, right to
Speaker 4: include the vice president and the Secretary of State, UH,
Speaker 4: sitting in on a podcast for someone who has been
Speaker 4: murdered in a in a highly politicized, highly contentious UH
Speaker 4: you know, very public way.
Speaker 1: Let me say something and then I want to hear
Speaker 1: Rucus's view on this, so I'll be brief. I don't
Speaker 1: know if mystical Pharaoh's with us.
Speaker 4: He is, Yeah, he's there.
Speaker 1: Oh okay. One another thing I mentioned on RBN today
Speaker 1: is that, and this was a preliminary statement, I'm not
Speaker 1: totally sure on this. It seems like the those that
Speaker 1: consider themselves the leaders of the alternative media and and
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not being disparaging toward candas Owan, but
Speaker 1: including her and Nick Fwandes and uh Ben Shapiro, the
Speaker 1: former Charlie Kirk, whatever the situation there, and some of
Speaker 1: the stuff you mentioned, they seem to be doing what
Speaker 1: I call framing. It's a framing process. In other words,
Speaker 1: they seem to be trying to solidify their position that
Speaker 1: they are the alternative media, that if you don't watch CBS, ABC,
Speaker 1: NBC and all that, that the next level, the trustworthy level,
Speaker 1: is this.
Speaker 4: People that used to work for ABC, NBC, CNN, Fox that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's probably included, correct, and to exclude maybe so
Speaker 1: I his name just comes up among the others as
Speaker 1: these young, fairly wealthy, more successful than average alternative media
Speaker 1: and influencer kind of people. Podcasters. They're not exactly maybe
Speaker 1: journalists in the strict sense, but it strikes me as
Speaker 1: a way to marginalize people like us, to set up
Speaker 1: another level of media that they can dm trustworthy and
Speaker 1: a so called alternative to the the old guard, the
Speaker 1: old legacy media cartel syndicate, and thereby marginalized and pushed
Speaker 1: further into the ghetto if they can those alternative voices
Speaker 1: that won't bend to the whims of the state. And
Speaker 1: obviously if they're having state, you know, members of the
Speaker 1: of the deep well, I shouldn't say deep state necessarily,
Speaker 1: but members of the actual federal government Rubio at all,
Speaker 1: actually doing podcasts, that's a line that really shouldn't be crossed.
Speaker 1: They can be a guest of a podcaster, but for
Speaker 1: them to be the podcaster themselves, to me, is crossing
Speaker 1: a line that that really doesn't belong there.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, Ruckus, What do you think, man, it already happened.
Speaker 7: The Veep did the thing he was I thought he
Speaker 7: did it on the first day. It was either that
Speaker 7: or the second day.
Speaker 4: Yeah, these things have happened. I think today was Rubio,
Speaker 4: and I think yesterday or day before, was fans y, Yeah,
Speaker 4: I've already done it.
Speaker 1: I meant that it had already happened. Yes, it's just
Speaker 1: that a precedent is being set, and these people are
Speaker 1: being christened I think as the leaders, at least the
Speaker 1: pace cars, the leaders, the real stars of the new media.
Speaker 1: Maybe a little bit of one American News is thrown
Speaker 1: in there for good measure. Fox has sort of lost
Speaker 1: its luster, and so there's a shuffling going on here,
Speaker 1: a reframing, and I can't quite see it all, but
Speaker 1: I'll leave it at that.
Speaker 7: There's another piece too, Mark that semi related, is the
Speaker 7: Jimmy Kimmel thing, right, so, and maybe we'll talk about
Speaker 7: I just want to bring this part up. Apparently what
Speaker 7: they're doing is in it's in the place of his program.
Speaker 7: Is they're doing Kirk. They're going to put his show
Speaker 7: or going to do an extended version of Charlie Kirk's show.
Speaker 7: They're putting Charlie Kirk material in place of the Jimmy
Speaker 7: Kimmel thing. That's first of all. Second of all, I
Speaker 7: made a side comment Joe halfway series. But maybe maybe
Speaker 7: the President himself might actually sit down and host an
Speaker 7: episode of the Charlie Cook Show, like all these other
Speaker 7: pundits are and politicians, and I remembered that who was there?
Speaker 7: Was it FDR? Or who was the one that did
Speaker 7: the fireside chats?
Speaker 3: That FDR?
Speaker 7: Okay? Well, and he's famous for certain conspiracy theory circles
Speaker 7: for a certain thing. It starts with the letter F.
Speaker 7: It's a four letter word anyway, He's a phony anyway.
Speaker 7: So yes, but I was thinking maybe Trump could turn
Speaker 7: this spin this into a series and do a series
Speaker 7: of fireside chat podcasts in this current environment. It makes
Speaker 7: sense because everything is so media and podcasts. And then
Speaker 7: my joke was that it wouldn't be called a fireside chat.
Speaker 7: It would either be called a firestorm chat or a
Speaker 7: ringside chat. I'm guessing ringside is probably the more appropriate
Speaker 7: term here, like a circus ring. Anyway, you mentioned the
Speaker 7: channel that I was just watching, and I think hasher
Speaker 7: watched it? In Whitebird? Yes, I got the link. That's
Speaker 7: what the same dude, the call for an uprising channel.
Speaker 7: He's got some material out there that I found quite compelling.
Speaker 7: He's got a lot of material that I find quite compelling.
Speaker 7: But I was already down the rabbit hole with the
Speaker 7: whole completely. What the f is going on? I have
Speaker 7: never seen so many on nailed nailed it, nailed it,
Speaker 7: nailed it, nailed it, nailed it, Freemasonry, esoteric symbolism, the
Speaker 7: thirty three, all of that stuff. I'm just like, usually
Speaker 7: there's just a little bit of this stuff and you
Speaker 7: have to like make a few jumps through some hoops. No,
Speaker 7: this is all right in your face, like this is
Speaker 7: some crazy stuff. So there was one video that that
Speaker 7: guy was showing the Hollywood special effects stuff. I don't
Speaker 7: know if you saw that with the squibs and.
Speaker 1: You know, yes, yes they did.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 7: So I'm like, I don't even know if I want
Speaker 7: to say it. I can't say it. I don't want
Speaker 7: to get canceled. But I'm just like, it's not out
Speaker 7: of the realm of possibility that somebody who we think
Speaker 7: was killed in real life. So we'll just use I'll
Speaker 7: do it that way. I won't say that. I can't. Yeah, anyway,
Speaker 7: you shout of it that if it's possible. That's all
Speaker 7: I'm saying is it's totally possible. So it's not impossible,
Speaker 7: and you can never if you're doing a true investigation
Speaker 7: or a true journalist or thinking or analyzing anything. You
Speaker 7: can't rule out something just because you know you think
Speaker 7: it's too out, it's too far. No, No, it's totally doable.
Speaker 7: It's totally possible. And I would make the argument that
Speaker 7: if somebody were to do something in a similar situation,
Speaker 7: because totally that's not what happened here, don't come at me, anybody.
Speaker 7: That would be the best case scenario to do something
Speaker 7: like that is do it in front of a bunch
Speaker 7: of people. Because people are terrible with their memories. People
Speaker 7: are terrible witnesses, especially in the heat of a moment
Speaker 7: when you hear a loud gun crack and you see
Speaker 7: that whatever, Like, do you how many people in the
Speaker 7: crowd if that happened, Like, because again we're not saying
Speaker 7: that that happened here, but if that happened something like
Speaker 7: that happened and you saw in some blood spurt and like,
Speaker 7: how long would you be sitting there staring at watching
Speaker 7: the guy with his blood or would you be immediately
Speaker 7: reacting and preserving yourself or would you be laser focused
Speaker 7: on what you're seeing. No, you're in scared mode. You're
Speaker 7: in and you're again you're your mind is going to
Speaker 7: play tricks on you. And now what was the first
Speaker 7: thing that they did is they collected all the cameras. Right,
Speaker 7: So again, if this were to happen, you know, if
Speaker 7: I were to you know, fake something like this, I
Speaker 7: would grab all the cameras, grab everybody's cell phones, take
Speaker 7: all that footage, and hey, you know, if we want
Speaker 7: to release something to the public, hey maybe I could
Speaker 7: tweak that a little bit here and there with some
Speaker 7: AI or something. I mean, that's not out of the
Speaker 7: realm of possibility, now, is it real?
Speaker 4: Real?
Speaker 1: Quick question? Again, my watching of this was very intermittent.
Speaker 1: They confiscated as many cell phones and cameras as they could.
Speaker 1: Is that correct?
Speaker 5: Correct?
Speaker 1: Well, okay, then, I mean, I mean, if you're Colombo
Speaker 1: or Sherlock Holmes or Adrian Monk or something, I mean,
Speaker 1: that's going to be that's going to be really in
Speaker 1: your face.
Speaker 7: What about the guy, didn't you Mark and you see
Speaker 7: the guy who immediately after, because we were talking about
Speaker 7: the lack of it being treated like a crime scene,
Speaker 7: the guy who is the head of their their media
Speaker 7: tech or it guy immediately wipes down, takes the camera down,
Speaker 7: and takes all apart real quick and stuffs it in
Speaker 7: his bag.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, exactly. So okay, So then, I mean, when
Speaker 1: you have so much preliminary evidence, circumstantial physical, visual evidence
Speaker 1: that something is very awry here, that it may have
Speaker 1: been faked, then you have to wonder, and this is
Speaker 1: where it gets a little scary, that you'd have to
Speaker 1: assume that the higher people in the ets of including
Speaker 1: the President himself, including Rubio, you'd have to assume that
Speaker 1: they know it was fake. I mean, how could they
Speaker 1: not know, right, and because they have their people and
Speaker 1: their analysts. Okay, so let's assume for a minute, and
Speaker 1: probably correctly so, that those highest up in our government's
Speaker 1: power know it was faked, and yet they're going to
Speaker 1: act like it wasn't in the face of in light
Speaker 1: of evidence that it evidently was, or strongly suggesting that
Speaker 1: it was, again not coming down too heavy on that. So,
Speaker 1: in other words, they're going to blatantly lie about the
Speaker 1: whole premise of the whole thing and then start doing
Speaker 1: podcasts themselves, all of it based on what appears to
Speaker 1: be a lie. And then you have to wonder what
Speaker 1: kind of contempt they'd have to have for the American
Speaker 1: people to base it all on a lie. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's one thing to lie about little details.
Speaker 4: Ultimately ultimate contempt.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if the whole thing is a lie and you
Speaker 1: act like it wasn't and you have paying homage to
Speaker 1: this and honoring that and making statues of Charlie Kirk,
Speaker 1: then that really doesn't taste good. I mean that's a
Speaker 1: really bitter taste. You know, that level of lying is
Speaker 1: unforgivably cruel.
Speaker 7: Really, and I hate to say it, but I believe
Speaker 7: that that is how most governments work, and people in
Speaker 7: highest levels of power, it doesn't matter if they're red
Speaker 7: or they're blue. I mean, so imagine this scenario. If
Speaker 7: you were describing, do you think somebody like a Chuck Schumer,
Speaker 7: a Nancy Pelosi, think of all of the most evil
Speaker 7: lefty Democrats or the George Soros. So they're the people
Speaker 7: who generally people Bill Gates, you'd be like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 7: I could totally see them doing that. How come all
Speaker 7: of a sudden you can't see it just because this
Speaker 7: Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, y'all, some people, not you or
Speaker 7: the audience, but people are falling for this this stupid
Speaker 7: political paradigm thing. When again, it's all about power and
Speaker 7: the people behind the scenes. As we've witnessed now with
Speaker 7: the changing of the guard from one color to the next,
Speaker 7: not a whole hell of a lot has technically changed
Speaker 7: on the world stage, in particular geopolitically speaking, And now
Speaker 7: we see one side acting exactly like the other side
Speaker 7: did with so many of these things, the cancel culture thing,
Speaker 7: like like as this side here is screaming at here
Speaker 7: Starmer in the UK, like, how dare you sensor people
Speaker 7: and lock them up for their social media posts? They're
Speaker 7: they're doing what they're doing saying we're at war with
Speaker 7: these people and all of those people should be locked
Speaker 7: up for their their their and censored for their social
Speaker 7: media posts. I mean, like what what was like? It's
Speaker 7: so in your face, Like if they're willing to if
Speaker 7: they mark, if they're willing to be that blatantly in
Speaker 7: your face about all the things that were witnessing in
Speaker 7: the fallout of the event, you would have to do
Speaker 7: you'd have to do with Charlie Kirk, would that proved
Speaker 7: me wrong? You'd have to prove me wrong that they didn't,
Speaker 7: that these people don't are not capable of being that
Speaker 7: level of evil and malignant because again, if they're willing
Speaker 7: and able to be this much forward in your face,
Speaker 7: with the hypocrisy and all of the things, I don't
Speaker 7: put it past them. Let's just put it that way.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'll mention as a brief bullet point that when
Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel was taken off the air, and he can
Speaker 1: be crude and rude and lude. I don't care for him.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's that funny, but I don't think
Speaker 1: that it warranted taking his show off the air because
Speaker 1: he said something a little bit.
Speaker 4: Wasn't he just repeating something he read on Wappo.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, a little bit in bad taste, but bad
Speaker 1: taste is not something that should be punishable by law.
Speaker 1: As much as I don't care for Jimmy Kimmel. And
Speaker 1: the thing is is that if you read the fine print,
Speaker 1: even CNN admitted that there's I think it's next Star
Speaker 1: one of these media companies, well, it owns a bunch
Speaker 1: of ABC affiliates that would show the Kimmel Show, the
Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel Show in whatever parts of the country that
Speaker 1: this affiliate serves. And right now, that affiliate that that
Speaker 1: company that owns these affiliates agreed to take the Kimmel
Speaker 1: Show off the air. Come to find out that same
Speaker 1: company wants to buy another company and wants FCC approval.
Speaker 1: And the FCC is part of those who are calling
Speaker 1: that called for Jimmy Kimmel to come up to be
Speaker 1: taken down, to be taken off the air. And so
Speaker 1: this company says, sure, we'll take Jimmy Kimmel off the air,
Speaker 1: but hey, we want a consolidation approval from you guys
Speaker 1: at the FCC. So they seem to be taking kim
Speaker 1: Al off the air so they can enlarge their media holdings.
Speaker 4: Are you referring to ABC buying MSNBC? Is that what that?
Speaker 4: Do I have that right?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 1: I don't have it right in front of me. It's
Speaker 1: it's a company I didn't recognize. And I think it's
Speaker 1: Next Star that owns some ABC affiliates. There's there's an
Speaker 1: ABC affiliate right here called KRGB, right down the road
Speaker 1: here in South Texas. But Next Star owns a certain
Speaker 1: number of ABC affiliates and it wants to buy another
Speaker 1: company that would enlarge its holdings. It's media holdings. So
Speaker 1: the claim is that Next Star took Jimmy Kimmel Offier
Speaker 1: to curry favor with the FCC. So it's so it's
Speaker 1: acquisition application would be approved and they're therefore it would
Speaker 1: enlarge its media holdings. So the motivation seems to be
Speaker 1: the growth of the mainstream media. And here the Trump
Speaker 1: administration has said, you know, the media is bad, the
Speaker 1: fake news. But what if Trump's FCC is going to
Speaker 1: approve a more consolidation of the media. I mean, the
Speaker 1: FCC's main job is not ideological. Its main job is
Speaker 1: to prevent any one company from owning too many media outlets.
Speaker 1: And yet the current FCC chairman is being very political
Speaker 1: and specifically saying Kimmel shouldn't have said that about Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk's murder, and therefore Kimball should come off the air
Speaker 1: that that's not how the FCC is supposed to operate.
Speaker 1: They're supposed to operate on preventing monopolies.
Speaker 4: Right right.
Speaker 1: Let me go, I had to get that in there,
Speaker 1: that that's that's really important.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I want to look a little bit deeper.
Speaker 4: In the next star. Let me go to mystical Pharaoh
Speaker 4: while I read a little bit about this over to
Speaker 4: you man.
Speaker 6: Well, just before I get into anything this camel. I
Speaker 6: was reading that his viewership was actually plummeting and it
Speaker 6: was down to like one hundred and forty four thousand views.
Speaker 6: So I think they just wanted to box him out.
Speaker 6: It was just a dying thing, and that was just
Speaker 6: an excuse. That's that's my guess. Otherwise they wouldn't have
Speaker 6: just sacrificed him. But I guess I'm trying to understand.
Speaker 6: Are you guys saying that that the potential that might
Speaker 6: not have happened.
Speaker 4: Yes, I don't know. That is a thing that's going
Speaker 4: around and Pharaoh. One of the things that people are
Speaker 4: pointing to when they're saying that is number one, the
Speaker 4: very rapid processing of Charlie Kirk's body and into you know,
Speaker 4: a casket, the very odd presentation by his wife in
Speaker 4: front of his body in the casket less than thirty
Speaker 4: six hours after he was shot. The destruction of the
Speaker 4: crime scene. And then there's a whole bunch of you know,
Speaker 4: stuff going around, Like I have a clip I can
Speaker 4: show you on the internet just kind of talking about
Speaker 4: like I have clips from former military people talking about
Speaker 4: that round and what it should look like if it
Speaker 4: does hit someone in the neck. There's just a lot
Speaker 4: of inconsistencies that people are pointing out and a lot
Speaker 4: of opportunities for fakery. And you know, this is this
Speaker 4: is what the system has bred. I have to say,
Speaker 4: you know, to the CIA, to the FBI, to law
Speaker 4: and federal law enforcement, to mass media cartels, I have
Speaker 4: to say, you are the ones that have invited this
Speaker 4: kind of speculation into our infosphere, okay, because you folks
Speaker 4: are the ones that set the narrative for these events,
Speaker 4: that classify the autopsies, that redact the police reports, that
Speaker 4: make that force the public to only rely on the
Speaker 4: government narrative and the mass media narrative. So you know,
Speaker 4: you could quell all of these things if you would disclose, unredacted,
Speaker 4: what happened at the Boston bombing, what happened at Columbine,
Speaker 4: what happened in nine to eleven, What happened to JFK,
Speaker 4: what happened to RFK, what happened to MLK, What happened
Speaker 4: with Ruby Ridge, what happened with Waco, what happened with
Speaker 4: the South Texas church shooting, what happened with the New
Speaker 4: Zealand church shooting. I could go on and on and on.
Speaker 4: But as journalists, we can't get the police reports through FOYA,
Speaker 4: we can't get the autopsies through FOYA, We can't get
Speaker 4: any of the facts, forensic facts that we would need
Speaker 4: to accept mainstream narratives or even update mainstream met narratives
Speaker 4: to match the forensic evidence. So, you know, for people
Speaker 4: that are getting mad at people for being so blackpilled
Speaker 4: on the media that they're saying, no, what, I don't
Speaker 4: buy any of this. I don't even think he's dead.
Speaker 4: That may be despicable to you, that may be deplorable
Speaker 4: to you, that may be heartless for you to hear,
Speaker 4: But when you really stop and think about it, can
Speaker 4: you prove to yourself literally actually, in a way that
Speaker 4: makes sense that you could convince someone else that your
Speaker 4: opinion on any of those events is correct versus theirs
Speaker 4: without those autopsies, those police reports, that forensic evidence, the interviews.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry, but if your butt hurt over anyone else's
Speaker 4: take on this, you need to really really step back
Speaker 4: and take a look at how you consider your mass media.
Speaker 4: Do you think those people are honest with you? Do
Speaker 4: you think those people are honest with you? When the
Speaker 4: current administration is one that you voted for. Only do
Speaker 4: you think they lie to you one hundred percent of
Speaker 4: the time when it's the administration that you didn't vote
Speaker 4: for the one you voted against, you're sadly mistaken. If
Speaker 4: you think it's that simple. I hate to break it
Speaker 4: to you. I don't want to tell you that you're
Speaker 4: simple jack. But you're simple Jack. And I'm sorry to
Speaker 4: have to break that news to people. But these institutions lie,
Speaker 4: and they create narratives, and they do it for political reasons.
Speaker 4: They do it for financial reasons, they do it for
Speaker 4: cultural reasons, they do it for geopolitical reasons, and it's
Speaker 4: happened over and over and over and over again. We
Speaker 4: just had a week ago, the twenty fourth anniversary of
Speaker 4: nine to eleven. Our friend and colleague Jason Burmis hosted
Speaker 4: a wonderful event with some really smart people talking about
Speaker 4: nine to eleven, and in particular, on his Facebook he
Speaker 4: posted the talks that John Karaku gave and that Dennis
Speaker 4: Cassinich gave And if you listen to those in their entirety,
Speaker 4: take about an hour of your time. Half hour. If
Speaker 4: you put it on two speed and you're able to
Speaker 4: absorb things at two speed, It's an amazing piece of context,
Speaker 4: amazing piece of geopolitical context that has no political sides
Speaker 4: involved in it, no confirmation bias involved in it, just
Speaker 4: the facts as they present them. Neither of these guys
Speaker 4: are right or left anymore, and both of their presentations
Speaker 4: I felt were so timely considering everything that's going on
Speaker 4: right now. Now. Israel comes into that big time in
Speaker 4: those discussions, but it needs to be said, and what
Speaker 4: they said was factual, and what they laid out is
Speaker 4: the path to war, the path to five thousand American
Speaker 4: soldiers dying in Iraq, the path to a propaganda thread
Speaker 4: about weapons of mass destruction that have led to twenty
Speaker 4: four years of chaos in the Middle East, where the
Speaker 4: goal was Israel's goal to take down Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Iraq,
Speaker 4: Afghanistan and ultimately Iran, throw some Somalia some Yemen in there,
Speaker 4: and some other ancillary things too. But it really said
Speaker 4: it all. It said it all to me like that
Speaker 4: is so worth watching. I highly recommend it. I'm going
Speaker 4: to put it in tonight's show notes in the links
Speaker 4: in the reference links so that you can go watch
Speaker 4: that on your own time. But at this point if
Speaker 4: you're still stuck and it is emotional. Don't get me wrong,
Speaker 4: I'm not trying to ding you for being emotional or
Speaker 4: emotionally attached to current events, especially if you're new to
Speaker 4: asking what the fuck? But if you're emotionally upset that
Speaker 4: somebody would point out and I just pointed out like
Speaker 4: three of the things that some of the folks in
Speaker 4: our chat were asking me to talk about, there's more.
Speaker 4: There is more we can go. That's the thing with
Speaker 4: this event. You can go way down the rabbit hole
Speaker 4: on how it didn't happen at all, right, like Epstein
Speaker 4: didn't kill himself. You can do that, and there's enough
Speaker 4: there to completely back you. I could do an entire
Speaker 4: show on how this was faked. I could also do
Speaker 4: an entire show on how this was done by the Massad.
Speaker 4: I can also do an entire show on how this
Speaker 4: was done by the Massad and the CIA together and
Speaker 4: maybe five. I could also do a show on how
Speaker 4: this was done by Trantifa. I could also do a
Speaker 4: show on how this was done by Antifa. I could
Speaker 4: do a show on how this was done by a
Speaker 4: Maga weirdo. I could even go Jimmy Kimmel on you.
Speaker 4: I'm pretty sure I could pull an hour out of
Speaker 4: that one and bring weird receipts for all of these
Speaker 4: that actually amount to nothing. That's where we're at. So sorry,
Speaker 4: Pharaoh there, I interrupted you. I do have some receipts
Speaker 4: on this whole. It was completely faked, and Charlie Kirk
Speaker 4: is still a live thing. There are points in there
Speaker 4: that are head scratchers and will stop you in your
Speaker 4: tracks and just making go uh uh. Maybe they're right.
Speaker 4: But I could do the same thing with every other
Speaker 4: one of those theories that I just mentioned, but this
Speaker 4: one is going pretty strong. I would say, let me
Speaker 4: go around the room, see what everybody else's temperature is
Speaker 4: on this. I would personally say that Israel did it
Speaker 4: seems to be the number one trending concept right theory
Speaker 4: if you will. And again, we wouldn't have to as
Speaker 4: a public make fucking theories if we had a government
Speaker 4: and a media that we're honest with us. That's why
Speaker 4: this happened. It's not because people are dicks. It's not
Speaker 4: because you need to go fight your neighbor if they
Speaker 4: don't have the same theory as you. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 4: that's not why this is happening. This is happening because
Speaker 4: every other highly politicized event that we've had to include
Speaker 4: school bang bangs, political bang bangs, geopolitical boom booms, all
Speaker 4: of them, Jabbi jabs, all of them. They all have
Speaker 4: nine or ten stories around them, and there's no fucking
Speaker 4: truth to be found around them, only data points and
Speaker 4: threads to pull on that goes all the way back
Speaker 4: to JFK further than that. Actually, so I'll step back.
Speaker 4: I'll give it back to you, Pharaoh, and if you
Speaker 4: want to see some of this stuff that people are
Speaker 4: thrown around with regards to that particular theory, I got
Speaker 4: a couple.
Speaker 3: Well, so.
Speaker 6: I'm not going to argue there was you on the
Speaker 6: point that all this is happening because of lack of transparency.
Speaker 6: And I think when I when we started the show,
Speaker 6: I said, this is not the first time that event
Speaker 6: was handled similar to any other events, right, and it
Speaker 6: doesn't matter what the event is. There is a playbook
Speaker 6: right that that that we see plays out of creating chaos,
Speaker 6: pushing for agendas from government agencies and people in power,
Speaker 6: while at the same time there's a lot of information
Speaker 6: being spread on different circles that can maybe put to
Speaker 6: discredit those who are really trying to seek the truth, right,
Speaker 6: m And.
Speaker 3: I don't.
Speaker 6: I don't think there is anybody right now has enough
Speaker 6: evidence to.
Speaker 3: Make any conclusion on anything. Right.
Speaker 6: But what this point too is everybody needs to just
Speaker 6: slow the f down, right, and stop pushing for propaganda
Speaker 6: and stop pushing for measures to use that event right
Speaker 6: the way they want to use it, right, because that's
Speaker 6: that's ultimately that's what this case is about. Like, Hey,
Speaker 6: let's just you know, we want to push for like
Speaker 6: freedom of speech, like I want to. They brought back
Speaker 6: the hate speech, right. There is a reason why they
Speaker 6: brought back the hate speech. So this is coming from
Speaker 6: a Republican administration, from Trump two point zero, his his
Speaker 6: attorney general was standing there and talking about hate speech, right,
Speaker 6: which is the whole idea why the right was fighting
Speaker 6: the left and saying there is no hate speech or
Speaker 6: hate speech is freedom of speech?
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 6: So but they're going around and they're canceling everybody m hm.
Speaker 6: Right Again, Around that same time, right the or actually
Speaker 6: the day after his death, the Republican Congress passed a
Speaker 6: funding bill. Were in that bill basically they had provisions
Speaker 6: preventing any company that boycotts Israel from getting any contracts
Speaker 6: with the US army. Right, And nobody knew anything about that, right.
Speaker 6: So what we're seeing is a lot of discourse and
Speaker 6: a lot of cyneica reaction from people because of the
Speaker 6: lack of transparency.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 6: And I don't think the reaction of any of those
Speaker 6: government figures right now, including the head of the FBI,
Speaker 6: is giving anybody good feeling. And I think it's going
Speaker 6: to backfire on them. I think the fact that the
Speaker 6: Israeli Prime Minister comes out and give three goes into
Speaker 6: a media tour in US media saying how much he
Speaker 6: loves Charlie Kirk and he invited him to Israel and
Speaker 6: so on.
Speaker 3: Right, yeah, here you go. That's a great one.
Speaker 6: It'lla cashalla yeah, vohalla cash yeah.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 6: So so it's the fact that he comes out and
Speaker 6: do a media tour in US media, the fact that
Speaker 6: a few days after Sholi Kirk's death, fifty US representative
Speaker 6: goes to Israel.
Speaker 4: It was two hundred and fifty is.
Speaker 6: It fifty or two hundred, and then they make this
Speaker 6: weird like fifty state one Israel event that is creepy
Speaker 6: as f right, and dude, if you have actually a
Speaker 6: video of that, I would think you should play it.
Speaker 4: But it's all I'm gonna look for it. I'm gonna
Speaker 4: look for it while you try. I do have it
Speaker 4: in my bookmarks somewhere, but my bookmarks for the last
Speaker 4: seven days are just bananas.
Speaker 6: The fact the same time the US ambassadors come come
Speaker 6: out and from Israel keeps pushing for those you know,
Speaker 6: narratives about Israel and US. The fact that our our
Speaker 6: Mark Rubew basically goes to Israel right and do his
Speaker 6: tour and his prayer and the wall and.
Speaker 3: So on, the war, kiss the wall.
Speaker 6: The fact that Trump today goes to UK and stand
Speaker 6: there with the King and say, you know, talks about
Speaker 6: October seventh and talking about how horrible it's actually the
Speaker 6: worst event in human history. Based on Trumpboard, it described
Speaker 6: October seventh as the worst event in human history.
Speaker 4: Tell that to the families of the people that survived
Speaker 4: that lost loved ones in nine to eleven. Dude, that's
Speaker 4: all I can say.
Speaker 3: I know, I know, right, but this is this has
Speaker 3: came out from his mouth.
Speaker 9: Tell Anthony Sauchi that, yeah, right, that is a that's
Speaker 9: just yeah, yeah, so it's and I think it's all
Speaker 9: gonna The fact that two days after, uh not two
Speaker 9: days like a few days after, Ben Shapierro.
Speaker 6: Matt Walsh and and Koalas goes and take over Charlie
Speaker 6: kirk show, right and start doing like a Zionist propaganda
Speaker 6: on the show, giving that before Charlie's death, Ben Shapiro
Speaker 6: and Mark Levin who was like talking crap about Charlie
Speaker 6: Kirk right on Levin show.
Speaker 4: Dude, did you see Charlie Kirk on on Shapiro's show?
Speaker 4: Like the just the absolute cringe on on Shapiro's face
Speaker 4: while Charlie Kirk was asking him some questions that a
Speaker 4: lot of people in this audience or have been asking
Speaker 4: for a long time.
Speaker 3: I know, I know, right.
Speaker 6: The fact that Candace and and Tucker are not even
Speaker 6: saying Israel did it. The fact that they are just
Speaker 6: saying we and and and blond thought right saying that
Speaker 6: we have evidence and receipts that Charlie Kirk has had
Speaker 6: pressure from Israeli donors, right and Zionist donors because he
Speaker 6: started questioning and because he could not contain the backlash
Speaker 6: from the young Americans because the whole Israeli relationship. I
Speaker 6: think it's everybody's waking up to that poison.
Speaker 3: And to be honest, if.
Speaker 6: You guys remember when Trump won that election, I said something.
Speaker 6: If I don't think he will remember what I said,
Speaker 6: but I remember what I said. I remember Israel is
Speaker 6: Israel thing is a lost cause in this election. And
Speaker 6: it was not my high spirity. My high speriority was
Speaker 6: taking out some of the other actors and so on.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it was like we were kind of talking and it
Speaker 4: was like, well, we know, we shouldn't get our hopes
Speaker 4: up about the ipack and is real issue, and we
Speaker 4: shouldn't get our hopes up about Gaza, but of course
Speaker 4: we're not gonna stop talking about it. But at the
Speaker 4: same time, it was like, there's all these other things
Speaker 4: that are happening, and and this seems to be where
Speaker 4: a lot of the mainstream MAGA crowd is stuck right now.
Speaker 4: They're really trying really hard to look at what's going
Speaker 4: well instead of the things that are going completely fucking wrong,
Speaker 4: which are tied up intimately with exactly what you're talking about.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and.
Speaker 6: Since then, I actually change my views. I completely changed
Speaker 6: my views. I'm actually right now, I'm for the first time,
Speaker 6: I'm going to say I'm on one issue voter, and
Speaker 6: that issue is we need to stop foreign influence in
Speaker 6: our government, and anybody that's gone Aroun, I don't care
Speaker 6: a Republican or Democrat that's gone around on the platform
Speaker 6: off foreign governments, especially Israel, right and getting those out
Speaker 6: of our politics because right now, as a nation, we
Speaker 6: cannot take any sovereign decision because we're completely controlled. Right
Speaker 6: So right now I became a single issue vote, and
Speaker 6: that single issue is I don't want foreign influence in
Speaker 6: our government period, and I don't care who's running to that,
Speaker 6: And this is how I'm gonna vote in twenty twenty six.
Speaker 3: I don't care.
Speaker 6: And Republicans are going to wake up to really brutal
Speaker 6: awakening in twenty twenty six to that fact, because a
Speaker 6: lot of younger generation.
Speaker 3: Are fed up with that.
Speaker 4: Right, Well, then that's I don't mean to interrupt Pharaoh,
Speaker 4: don't forget where you were headed with that, but I
Speaker 4: just want to interjact and say that is the crux
Speaker 4: of what a lot of people are saying. When they're
Speaker 4: saying this was a masade operation, they're saying Charlie Kirk,
Speaker 4: which like Candice Owens, started very young, and they started
Speaker 4: somewhat naive, and they went with the mainstream sort of
Speaker 4: GOP thing, and they really latched on to the culture
Speaker 4: Wars aspect pretty much, and they made their name, you know,
Speaker 4: sort of criticizing the culture Wars Charlie in particular, because
Speaker 4: what is turning point, USA do They go to colleges,
Speaker 4: they talk to people that are between eighteen and twenty
Speaker 4: five and they debate them. They're master debaters. Shout out
Speaker 4: to South Park master debating right there. Charlie Kirk is
Speaker 4: the poster child for master debating people that are younger
Speaker 4: than him. While he has a team of people around
Speaker 4: him that help him with talking point, not that he
Speaker 4: wasn't smart enough to come with his own stuff on
Speaker 4: his own. I'm not taking anything away from him, but
Speaker 4: he did have a multie hundred plus million dollar organization
Speaker 4: by the time this happened to him him and he
Speaker 4: did exactly that. He rode the culture Wars thing. Like
Speaker 4: Boiler Room, We've taken a lot of culture Wars things
Speaker 4: on before anybody else would here on this show, we
Speaker 4: are like the Masons of Culture War criticism here, and
Speaker 4: I don't really, it doesn't bother me that we don't
Speaker 4: get the credit we deserve for that. Like, that's basically
Speaker 4: the reality of the Icebreaker segment of this show. That's
Speaker 4: what we were trying to point out, going all the
Speaker 4: way back to a decade ago. But things have changed
Speaker 4: so much. The geopolitics are so important, the national politics
Speaker 4: are so important. The effects of the lost Culture War
Speaker 4: are so important. And I'm sorry it's been lost. Not
Speaker 4: that one side won, but that it fractured the country
Speaker 4: into different camps and made it political to have cultural ideas. Right.
Speaker 4: So Charlie, he rode that rocket ship. He's doctor Strange,
Speaker 4: loved that rocket ship of criticizing culture wars. Forgive the
Speaker 4: cash betelledness of this, but right to Valhalla. That's that
Speaker 4: was his thing. And you know, to see like people
Speaker 4: on the right grab onto it now and say, oh,
Speaker 4: we want to be like people on the left and
Speaker 4: cancel people for criticizing this whole thing that has been created.
Speaker 5: Hash.
Speaker 1: I gotta say, Hash that that was a rich club
Speaker 1: sandwich of metaphor there.
Speaker 4: Thank you. Randy J would be proud of me. He's
Speaker 4: my metaphor guy.
Speaker 1: By Doctor Strangelove. I can see him with the cowboy
Speaker 1: boots riding the rocket. Yeah yeah, that that that was.
Speaker 1: That was a good serving of metaphor. You know, I
Speaker 1: feel like I had the dessert after the meal here.
Speaker 4: So we're just getting started.
Speaker 1: Mark, well like whoa Thanksgiving? Sorry Pharaoh, but hey, I
Speaker 1: got to sign off soon. That morning cup of coffees
Speaker 1: like five minutes away once I fall asleep.
Speaker 4: All right, man, we'll let you go. You got any
Speaker 4: save rounds? Final thoughts? Be sure give a shout out
Speaker 4: to where people can find you. Obviously we can see
Speaker 4: it if you're watching, you can see it there in
Speaker 4: Mark's subtitle www Do people still even say that anymore?
Speaker 4: Thetruthhound dot com.
Speaker 1: Right UK column Fridays and I Republic Broadcasting Stop the
Speaker 1: Presses has been moved to Thursdays at one pm Central,
Speaker 1: one hour long, and I covered this issue today The
Speaker 1: Kirk Riddle I called it in the show notes. But
Speaker 1: hats off to you guys for having the cajones to
Speaker 1: question the basic narrative. I'll I'll just part with this.
Speaker 1: I discovered there was another version of nineteen eighty four
Speaker 1: made into a The earliest one I found was made
Speaker 1: for TV, then converted to a movie starring Eddie Arnold
Speaker 1: and Lauren Green of all people. Then I found that
Speaker 1: one had been done starring Edmund O'Brien in nineteen fifty six.
Speaker 1: So that's in between the first one and the one
Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty four starring Richard Burton and John Hurt,
Speaker 1: and the one made in nineteen fifty six seem to have,
Speaker 1: if I'm not mistaken, a little more emphasis on what
Speaker 1: the final goal is of the all powerful state, and
Speaker 1: that is it's not just to make things hard to
Speaker 1: know or hard to understand, as bad as that is.
Speaker 1: It's to make them unknowable to where you can't know
Speaker 1: something with enough certainty to say I know that to
Speaker 1: be true. Right, And so it comes back to that
Speaker 1: scary principle of all all corrupt governments. The state can't
Speaker 1: be wrong. That's the double Dalo says, whatever, Rubio says, whatever,
Speaker 1: anybody in the cabinet says, it's right because it's them.
Speaker 1: It's right because it's the state. They can say two
Speaker 1: plus two is five, and like in nineteen eighty four,
Speaker 1: they can be right because they're the government. They don't
Speaker 1: have to be accurate. They can't be wrong. Drive that home,
Speaker 1: think about what that means.
Speaker 4: And you know, and Mark, you know what government has
Speaker 4: that down to a science. Israel. We are seeing our government.
Speaker 1: In association with the US, Yes.
Speaker 4: In association with the US, Israel has that down. And
Speaker 4: you know why they have it down better than any
Speaker 4: other country. It's because they have the ultimate victim card
Speaker 4: that they can whip out. And you saw net and
Speaker 4: Yahoo do it. You saw him bring out the ultimate
Speaker 4: victim cards, which are Holocaust and then the ultimate unification card,
Speaker 4: which is Judeo Christianity, which doesn't exist. Right, But we're
Speaker 4: not allowed to say that, right, We're we're antiseptic if
Speaker 4: we say that. But that particular government, like if you
Speaker 4: watch in particular on some of their interviews, some of
Speaker 4: the like sixty minutes interviews, some other ones. I mean,
Speaker 4: we've played clips of it here on the show, telling
Speaker 4: people here in America. We write the script, we set
Speaker 4: the players, we control everything, and if one of your
Speaker 4: politicians steps out of line, we can remove them. We
Speaker 4: can do anything that we want. I'm not I'm paraphrasing here,
Speaker 4: but I'm not exaggerating. This is exactly the kind of
Speaker 4: stuff that has come out of that government for a really,
Speaker 4: really long time and people are realizing it now. And
Speaker 4: to me, like the fact that people are uh forgive
Speaker 4: the term allowed to realize that these days really has
Speaker 4: me concerned. I think that the reason we're not kicked
Speaker 4: off of YouTube the I mean, I mean, look at
Speaker 4: just just think about it. If you've been around in
Speaker 4: these circles for over a decade or more. Remember David Duke,
Speaker 4: Remember David Duke. Remember a couple of other people that
Speaker 4: you know, Mark, you could probably name off a couple
Speaker 4: here who were basically just pariahs on the old Twitter.
Speaker 4: They were like the awful anti Semites on there. No
Speaker 4: matter what they said, that was the worst thing that
Speaker 4: could be said on the Internet. And when the shadow
Speaker 4: banding came in in twenty seventeen, in the fall of
Speaker 4: twenty seventeen, they got pretty much, you know, out of everybody,
Speaker 4: they got them out of there, and then they started
Speaker 4: kicking people like us out who were simply questioning events
Speaker 4: happening in the Middle East. We're questioning what was going
Speaker 4: on in Syria, we were questioning what was going on
Speaker 4: with the propaganda unit known as the White Helmets in Syria.
Speaker 4: We were questioning a lot of these things, and we
Speaker 4: got the same treatment as David Duke. And David Duke
Speaker 4: is someone who is famous for criticizing Israel, that's his thing,
Speaker 4: and we were simply criticizing the propaganda that we were
Speaker 4: seeing come out of the Syrian conflict between twenty fourteen
Speaker 4: and twenty seventeen and then totally shut down for it.
Speaker 4: And those visibility filters and shadow bands have not been
Speaker 4: lifted for twenty first Century Wire dot Com, or for
Speaker 4: Alternate Current Radio, or for a number of other people
Speaker 4: out there. Many of our colleagues, a lot of their
Speaker 4: accounts don't work right and should work right, because now
Speaker 4: these things are okay to say. Now, Nick fuint As
Speaker 4: can go on X and YouTube and drop the N
Speaker 4: word all over the place and use all kind of
Speaker 4: racial epithets against anybody while speaking somewhat based. This is new,
Speaker 4: and this is exactly what I'm afraid is happening right now.
Speaker 4: This is exactly why I'm afraid that the Israel did
Speaker 4: It narrative, which is, in my viewing on social media,
Speaker 4: the most popular one right now, and people coming at
Speaker 4: it with many receipts and many reasons for why they
Speaker 4: think that is it's not being shut down, it's not
Speaker 4: being banned, it actually looks like it's being boosted. What
Speaker 4: is with that change? Are we looking at a future
Speaker 4: where the next president or the one after that, say
Speaker 4: president God forbid. President Gavin Newsom in the year twenty
Speaker 4: twenty eight says, you know what, much like the previous administration,
Speaker 4: Donald Trump ran, We're tired of all the antiseptic speak
Speaker 4: out there. And we've got Peter Thiel sitting right here
Speaker 4: next to us, and he's going to use palanteer. We've
Speaker 4: got Eric Schmidt sitting right next to us. We've got
Speaker 4: you know, Elon Musk sitting right next to us, across
Speaker 4: both administrations, and we're coming after those voices or martial
Speaker 4: law happens. Let's say God forbid yet again. Other names
Speaker 4: we've seen other names being casted out as you're next
Speaker 4: on the list, next to Charlie Kirk right, some of
Speaker 4: those names I've mentioned already, s tier meaning top tier podcasters,
Speaker 4: you're on the list next. Let's say all the same
Speaker 4: thing happens to all of them. Does the government crack down?
Speaker 4: Does the Trump administration crack down in the next twelve
Speaker 4: months after this happens three more times and start removing
Speaker 4: constitutional rights. What happens when the next administration comes in.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that would explain the action reaction phenomenon ratcheted up
Speaker 1: as it use that as an excuse to go after
Speaker 1: Second and First Amendment rights, ratchet it up some more,
Speaker 1: thereby thinning the herd of the alternative media down to
Speaker 1: the accepted few, and basically, if not criminalizing, at least
Speaker 1: seriously discrediting the larger universe of the alternative media. But
Speaker 1: the good news is they would only do that if
Speaker 1: they thought they were losing the narrative, which they are,
Speaker 1: and they're getting desperate. If we're reading this right, If
Speaker 1: we're reading this right based on what you're saying, Heshan
Speaker 1: and Rucus and Pharaoh, if we're reading this right, then
Speaker 1: it's because they were fearful of losing the narrative, because
Speaker 1: they can't lose it. Once they do the toothpastes out
Speaker 1: of the tube, you can't put it back. So that
Speaker 1: would explain in a way why they might have this
Speaker 1: event involving Charlie Kirk, whatever it actually was, and maybe
Speaker 1: more like you're insinuating Hash, it would be they're so
Speaker 1: scared of losing the narrative, that they're going to try
Speaker 1: and do something thing drastic to discredit part of the
Speaker 1: alternative media, anoint a small part of it, that they'll
Speaker 1: make the main voices and try and frame it that way,
Speaker 1: hoping they can regain the traction on the narrative. I
Speaker 1: think they're going to lose it anyway. I think it's
Speaker 1: a sign of desperation. That's a little bit of good news,
Speaker 1: although I could be reading the tea leaves a little
Speaker 1: bit wrong, but I'll leave it at that for today.
Speaker 4: All right, Mark, there we go. Here's the picture right here.
Speaker 4: Before you jump out, Mark, let me put it on
Speaker 4: full screen. There it is two hundred and fifty delegates
Speaker 4: from America in Israel. There. They all are right there.
Speaker 4: So get your ais out, identify all these people and
Speaker 4: ask yourself why it is you only have ten representatives
Speaker 4: on Capitol Hill in total, out of like what five
Speaker 4: hundred and Samad who are not taking money from iPad.
Speaker 4: Let me ask yourself that, seriously, What's what's the deal
Speaker 4: with that? And Mark, I think you reminded me my
Speaker 4: point when I was replying to Pharaoh earlier that I
Speaker 4: kind of lost in a rabbit hole there, So thanks
Speaker 4: for that. I'll circle back to Pharaoh after you jump
Speaker 4: out of here. I flee him, Chief Banker, Thanks for
Speaker 4: being here tonight thetruthhound dot com of course, stop the
Speaker 4: presses and on Fridays at UK column. So that's tomorrow
Speaker 4: on UK column early in the morning for US American folks,
Speaker 4: but you can catch the archives whenever you want. Thanks
Speaker 4: for being here tonight.
Speaker 1: Mark, sure be well, gentlemen, good job.
Speaker 4: All right, there he goes, there's Mark Anderson, Pharaoh. What
Speaker 4: I was trying to get to when I got lost
Speaker 4: in my rabbit hole of ranting there was that Charlie
Speaker 4: Kirk has pretty much shown and been shown by the
Speaker 4: people that interact with him in that age group eighteen
Speaker 4: to thirty whatever, that that demographic no longer horse Israel.
Speaker 4: And I'm wondering, and that is one of the main
Speaker 4: pieces I think in the argument that people are making
Speaker 4: that hey, maybe the Masade did this. It's that demographic,
Speaker 4: like there are no young people anymore. Like it's a
Speaker 4: boomer thing. Not to say based boomer's no offense, but
Speaker 4: it's a boomer thing to support Israel.
Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, exactly. And and and the fact that like
Speaker 6: like the news that BB offered him one hundred and
Speaker 6: fifty million and he refused it, you know, to actually
Speaker 6: cut anti Israel talks, and he just didn't want to
Speaker 6: do it, you know. And so it's I think it's
Speaker 6: a the fight right now is with that younger generation
Speaker 6: minds right as you said, ass as this current generation
Speaker 6: gets out. The question is how they can continue controlling
Speaker 6: the narrative. And you see tie that to the attack
Speaker 6: they are doing in TikTok right now, right and even
Speaker 6: Trump pushing for for for American company to buy TikTok,
Speaker 6: and then they hiring someone from the IDEAF and now
Speaker 6: they start disabling channels that that attacks Israel right or
Speaker 6: push any anti Israel narratives.
Speaker 3: So you have to look at all of.
Speaker 6: This and together to see like, hey, what is the
Speaker 6: bigger picture we're missing right here. Again, we're not saying
Speaker 6: that they necessarily the one who did it, but we
Speaker 6: also know that a lot of those, even violent events,
Speaker 6: it doesn't need to be someone specifically from the you know,
Speaker 6: agency doing it right. It can be someone just triggering
Speaker 6: an asset or some kind of brainwashed person to do
Speaker 6: an events right. And and we saw that happening many times,
Speaker 6: so you should not just discredit that. And I think
Speaker 6: there is a lot of legitimate reason why you have
Speaker 6: we have to look into this and again, independent from
Speaker 6: any of this, and depending on how Charley Kick died,
Speaker 6: it's tragic, but he's dead and he's gone. Right now,
Speaker 6: we need to move on and we have to be
Speaker 6: very vigilant to all the efforts that is being pushed
Speaker 6: right now to decriminalize and calling Antifa terrorist organ What
Speaker 6: is even antifa? Is there is even an organization called antifa?
Speaker 4: Dude?
Speaker 6: Okayficial thing called antifa or anybody can be labeled antifa?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 3: Didn't there is nothing called antifa?
Speaker 4: Correct me if I'm wrong. But didn't they tell us
Speaker 4: in the Biden administration there is no such organized group
Speaker 4: as Antifa. It is an idea, Yes, that's all it is.
Speaker 6: I and that and that is why How can you
Speaker 6: come and say I'm gonna la.
Speaker 3: What is Antifa?
Speaker 4: Right? Why do we need a terrorist organization to come
Speaker 4: to you know, to to to make legal action against
Speaker 4: a murderer we have? Are there no laws in Utah
Speaker 4: about murder? You know what I mean? Is there no?
Speaker 4: Is there no death penalty for a first degree murder
Speaker 4: in Utah. We really need to like, like, what the
Speaker 4: fuck man, We're gonna stop and talk about, uh, hate crime,
Speaker 4: scam Blondie, what are you doing? Like? Your base doesn't
Speaker 4: like this. I'm just pointing this out as someone who's
Speaker 4: not in your base. Your base doesn't like it when
Speaker 4: you talk about hate crimes because your base has been
Speaker 4: educated by people like Charlie Kirk, who knows simple things like, uh,
Speaker 4: what's in the Bill of Rights? Okay? So to add
Speaker 4: a new enhancement on a crime this, this is just
Speaker 4: rank disgusting, unconstitutional, un American, leaning on the nda A,
Speaker 4: leaning on the the Patriot Act. Bullshit, fuck you. That's
Speaker 4: what MAGA is. Some parts of the MAGA are saying
Speaker 4: to scam Blondie right now, they're saying, fuck you. Charlie
Speaker 4: Kirk wouldn't have even wanted this problem. Turning point solution,
Speaker 4: what up? Media Bear? Go to media Bear subscribe please yeah,
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and try to try to talk it back and saying, oh,
Speaker 6: I was talking about inciting violence against people. But but
Speaker 6: we all know that, you know the difference between trying
Speaker 6: to kill someone and standing out there and criticizing someone
Speaker 6: or criticizing someone ideas, right, you don't have to stand
Speaker 6: there and tell us, yeah, inciting, inciting violences is punishable, right,
Speaker 6: I mean we all know that, right. So this is,
Speaker 6: you know, just treating people as if they are idiots.
Speaker 6: And and sadly, a lot of like.
Speaker 3: Those new like.
Speaker 6: Influencers on like X and then they're just pushing those
Speaker 6: narratives and you see they get their talking points right,
Speaker 6: and and and it's.
Speaker 4: And who the fuck were all these people eight years ago?
Speaker 4: Nobody's ever heard of any of these people eight years ago,
Speaker 4: not a single fucking one of us. It's insane. It's
Speaker 4: insane how much money has flowed into the influencer machine
Speaker 4: on both sides. It's I mean, if we were able
Speaker 4: to pull some and we've done this before, we've attempted
Speaker 4: to do this, pull some sort of like idea of
Speaker 4: what has been spent by some of these political action committees,
Speaker 4: by some of these NGOs, by foreign actors like Ipack.
Speaker 4: It's absolutely insane. Six hundred and fifty million dollars in
Speaker 4: arms going to Israel in the NDAA, which was passed
Speaker 4: this year. While we were all scrambling around talking about
Speaker 4: what a sniper would do. What a professional hit looks like,
Speaker 4: what masade would do, what a what a ricochet would
Speaker 4: do off of a piece of body armor. Like, we're
Speaker 4: literally grasping at straws for something that we're never going
Speaker 4: to get information for, and they're in the background bombing Doha, right,
Speaker 4: bombing Cutter Qatar? If you prefer what isn't? Forgive me?
Speaker 4: Am I wrong? Did I miss something? At last I
Speaker 4: heard Cutter was an ally of ours and the biggest
Speaker 4: airbase in the world, a US air base, is right
Speaker 4: there in Kathar, So why are we bombing an ally?
Speaker 4: You know what I mean? It's just like, okay, we
Speaker 4: got NDAA passing in the background. We've got geopolitical murder
Speaker 4: and bombings going on in the background. And who does
Speaker 4: this benefit? What American be they right left, independent, DGAF
Speaker 4: libertarian benefits from bombing Doha, from allowing Israel to bomb Doha?
Speaker 4: Someone please enlighten me. What do I said? Did my
Speaker 4: sandwich price go down from twenty dollars to eighteen dollars?
Speaker 4: Like did my crypto go up? Uh? Am I more?
Speaker 4: Am I safer? Fuck you?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 5: So?
Speaker 6: Uh interesting? Well we'll see, man, it's and it's really interesting.
Speaker 6: Trump point zero has been very very interesting. Yeah, presidency,
Speaker 6: and it's what we're like in the ninth months or
Speaker 6: eighth months.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we've still got three years of this to experience
Speaker 4: here like where And that's you know, Ruckus and I
Speaker 4: were going back and forth about the title for the
Speaker 4: show tonight, like as we're getting started. That's one of
Speaker 4: the reasons I think we had a bit of a
Speaker 4: hiccup on the YouTube. But you know, chaos in a
Speaker 4: post Charlie America. Who to think that a thirty two
Speaker 4: year old influencer would be the turning point, the flash
Speaker 4: point of what some people are. You know, people are
Speaker 4: calling for civil war right now. People are calling this
Speaker 4: a civil war. And it's like, I'm just sitting here, going, uh,
Speaker 4: where were all of you in twenty twenty when they
Speaker 4: told you couldn't leave your house? Where were all of
Speaker 4: you in twenty twenty one when they told you you
Speaker 4: couldn't leave the state or your country or go to
Speaker 4: your job without an experimental shot of some sort. Was
Speaker 4: that not a war by government on the people? Was
Speaker 4: that not a unconstitutional, egregious violation of our constitutional rights?
Speaker 3: Yep?
Speaker 6: And then the question is, where are you going to
Speaker 6: be in twenty twenty six when the remaining wealth transfer
Speaker 6: of the middle class is completely is finished under Trump
Speaker 6: two point zero?
Speaker 3: Right? Was economic downturn that's going to happen?
Speaker 4: So yeah, And what happens if three more events like
Speaker 4: this happen? Where are we going to be?
Speaker 5: Like?
Speaker 4: Are we all? I mean, just forgive me, don't mean
Speaker 4: to be morbid here, But what happens if in three
Speaker 4: years from now or two years from now, Tucker's off
Speaker 4: the map, Candae is off the map, Meghan Kelly's off
Speaker 4: the map? You know, Cash Betel's off the map? Something big?
Speaker 4: You know what happens if this is the beginning of
Speaker 4: a string of events like this and the very first
Speaker 4: salvo of this. This string has caused conservatives to say,
Speaker 4: you know what I want to behave like a progressive leftist.
Speaker 4: I want to censor people. I want to take people's
Speaker 4: constitutional rights away. I want red flag laws, and on
Speaker 4: and on and on. I want antibds laws, Like what
Speaker 4: does that look like? Is that something that's possible?
Speaker 3: Yea?
Speaker 4: And what would the reaction be from the government, right,
Speaker 4: they would I mean, this is a case of like
Speaker 4: potentially escalation of events, terroristic events, if you will, that
Speaker 4: could lead to something like that. What if all those
Speaker 4: people end up in Valhalla. By the way, if you
Speaker 4: really want to screw your brain up, there are reports
Speaker 4: flying around on X that there is a Central Intelligence
Speaker 4: Agency witness protection program called Valhalla. So if that's not
Speaker 4: helping things, if that's true, I haven't chased it down personally.
Speaker 4: But if that's really a thing, I know.
Speaker 7: What Bill Cooper would say. At least, of.
Speaker 4: Course, read everything, watch everything, don't believe anything you can't
Speaker 4: prove to yourself.
Speaker 7: Well there's that. Of course, there's that, which just blows
Speaker 7: all this stuff.
Speaker 4: Out of the water, right, all of it. Yeah, you
Speaker 4: can go.
Speaker 7: But the other stuff, I mean, because you know, that's
Speaker 7: not all he was into. He was also into learning
Speaker 7: the who, the what, the where, the why, the how
Speaker 7: the why. He did the Mystery Schools, the Mystery Babylon
Speaker 7: series that he did, the thirty something plus there's thirties. Yeah, yeah, Valhalla,
Speaker 7: that's a there's a lot of mystery school, Freemasonry, Illuminati,
Speaker 7: secret society, esoteric symbolism stuff with that that was not
Speaker 7: by accidents. When mister cash app PayPal there did the same.
Speaker 7: Now listen, listen, listen to the viewers want this. I know.
Speaker 7: I gave him a little tease of this on Sunday
Speaker 7: Wire in case she missed it. Check back to Sunday
Speaker 7: Wire to hear some of my other crazy thoughts about this.
Speaker 7: But I'm going to do it. I'll catch you up
Speaker 7: on it and then some Okay, So, Pharaoh, I hope
Speaker 7: you're sitting down for this one. Are you okay? I
Speaker 7: am okay. You can handle this, all right, I know
Speaker 7: you can do this, all right. So look, man, okay,
Speaker 7: So all the stuff we've been talking about is one thing,
Speaker 7: but hasher you mentioned this? How quickly everything was like, oh,
Speaker 7: we're going to have a oh look, we're ready for
Speaker 7: a funeral, right already, right, And we got the funeral,
Speaker 7: and we all got to Since we didn't get to
Speaker 7: go to the funeral, we got to see a video
Speaker 7: clip of the wife. The widow Erica, interesting name too,
Speaker 7: but she The video clip, by the way, was thirty
Speaker 7: three seconds long. You can't make that up. But in
Speaker 7: that video you might notice a couple of things, not
Speaker 7: the least of which is the fact that, first of all,
Speaker 7: what's up with that hand? You all remember during like
Speaker 7: the P word, when we saw pictures of the leged
Speaker 7: patients slaying in a bed, and we would see something
Speaker 7: that looked like that, what was the first thing we
Speaker 7: would say, right, we would say, oh my god, that
Speaker 7: looks like a mannequin. Okay, well, hey Doe, wait a minute,
Speaker 7: she has a nice manicure there on her fingers. But
Speaker 7: what's what's with these rings? What's this ring she's got
Speaker 7: on her finger? That's random, especially since this was the
Speaker 7: focus of the video. And if and you know, you
Speaker 7: know anything about marketing, propaganda, or video making or any content,
Speaker 7: why are we focusing on the hand. What's going on here?
Speaker 7: And what's with that? Why is that ring look so familiar?
Speaker 7: It almost looks like, Oh my goodness, it almost looks
Speaker 7: like something like that. But that couldn't possibly be, you
Speaker 7: crazy conspiracy theorist Adam. Well, here's what I brought up
Speaker 7: on Sunday Wire. Here's a nice little bunch of pictures
Speaker 7: mashed together that that gives you the breakdown. But the
Speaker 7: most important jarring thing, first of all, is the man's name. Okay,
Speaker 7: Charlie Charles Kirk. Okay, When you look at like the
Speaker 7: the etymology of the name Charles and thinks Charlemon. It
Speaker 7: means like a free, a free person, like a free
Speaker 7: a free man. And Kirk is another name for Church.
Speaker 7: His middle name, by the way, was James, which is
Speaker 7: also another word for Jacob, which is also a reference
Speaker 7: to Israel. He's got the forty seven hats going on
Speaker 7: right with the Trump thing Trump's, but he had three
Speaker 7: of them in front of him. So and if you
Speaker 7: take seven plus four, that's eleven. So you have eleven
Speaker 7: eleven eleven, that's thirty three. But it doesn't matter because
Speaker 7: of course there is the forty seven degrees in the
Speaker 7: square and compass. By the way, the Killer Tyler was
Speaker 7: his name. That's also the name of the bodyguard who
Speaker 7: stands guard at the Freemason lodge. And the way Charlie
Speaker 7: Kirk died, you can see this pose and how it
Speaker 7: was in his throat matches the oath that the initiates
Speaker 7: take to have their their throat cut across. And you
Speaker 7: see this little pose that they're doing there when he
Speaker 7: drops the microphone after he was shot, he's basically kind
Speaker 7: of doing this pose. He had like his one arm
Speaker 7: went up near his neck and the other one down
Speaker 7: on the side, and somebody brought this up because I
Speaker 7: thought this was very interesting. Of course it took thirty
Speaker 7: three hours. They waited, they waited to say, oh, we
Speaker 7: caught the guy, and it was in a miraculous time,
Speaker 7: thirty three there's just too much of this stuff. They
Speaker 7: painted murals of the guy that reminded me of what
Speaker 7: they did with George Floyd. Oh, isn't that interesting. They
Speaker 7: both have the exact same birthday, except separate years. That's
Speaker 7: very very interesting. Oh, George. By the way, George, I
Speaker 7: know there's some stuff about Saint George up there in
Speaker 7: Utah where the killer lived. This is really fascinating stuff
Speaker 7: right here. The suspect lives in Saint George, Utah, which
Speaker 7: is near Zion National Park, about two hundred and fifty
Speaker 7: miles southwest of the campus where Kirk was shot. So
Speaker 7: you know, it's just those types of things make you go,
Speaker 7: what's up with that? And then the timing of the event,
Speaker 7: because I promised that I was going to look into this,
Speaker 7: and sure enough, September tenth, twenty twenty five, was the
Speaker 7: exact midpoint of the current eclipse season. And that's related
Speaker 7: to this little cross pattern that you see here between
Speaker 7: the planets, which is the signal the sigil of Lucifer.
Speaker 7: So I'm sure all of these things are just a coincidence,
Speaker 7: but methinks not. And I don't know. And yeah, I
Speaker 7: just these are the things that make you go hmm,
Speaker 7: you know what I mean? And and and I'm just
Speaker 7: saying that for these to be this many things, it
Speaker 7: would be incredibly difficult for them to truly kill that person.
Speaker 7: With one exception because again, I think it was important
Speaker 7: that the wound is. If it was a crack sniper
Speaker 7: and the intent was not to shoot him in the neck,
Speaker 7: but to shoot him directly across the neck, to cut
Speaker 7: his neck, to slice his throat like it is in
Speaker 7: the that's impossible. Then they would also have to bury
Speaker 7: him in the sand near the ocean related to where
Speaker 7: the tides meet, or something more esoteric about how the
Speaker 7: body's laid, if they were going to really go that route.
Speaker 7: But again, they said he was going to Valhalla, and
Speaker 7: I think that's a very important thing because if you
Speaker 7: if you dig deep into some of this Valhalla mythos
Speaker 7: and what Bill Cooper was talking about back in the
Speaker 7: day is a phony boloney like made up like little
Speaker 7: safe haven garbage. So I think they spirited the guy
Speaker 7: away somewhere like in a safe I think the witness
Speaker 7: protection ideas is again it's it's not out of the
Speaker 7: realm of possibility.
Speaker 4: We can't rule it is there. Okay, riddle me this,
Speaker 4: you guys. Is there a single theory that you've heard
Speaker 4: yet that we can't rule out or that we won't
Speaker 4: be able to rule out after this is all adjudicated.
Speaker 4: I can't think of one.
Speaker 7: Well, well, that's the other thing? Is is you listed
Speaker 7: all the things and I'm like, well, it's all of
Speaker 7: those things. Yes, it's it's all of the things. It's
Speaker 7: all of the theory. And then and then that. Then
Speaker 7: then there's the elephant in the room. There's the Israel thing. Okay. Now, again,
Speaker 7: if you do your research and you dig deep, I mean,
Speaker 7: you don't have to drink too much kool aid, just
Speaker 7: do some research. You find out that the Zionism, the
Speaker 7: foundations of that, and the foundation the creation of the
Speaker 7: state of Israel is very much tied into the mystery schools,
Speaker 7: the secret societies, the Freemason types, the rothschilds and all that.
Speaker 7: I mean, it's again, not out of the realm of possibility,
Speaker 7: that all of these things are directly related and intentional,
Speaker 7: and this serves a huge turning point, a huge shift,
Speaker 7: because these are the people who you know, just look
Speaker 7: on the back of your money and whatnot, if you
Speaker 7: know what I mean, order out of chaos, the whole
Speaker 7: order out of chaos thing. I think that this was
Speaker 7: a huge ritual. This is a huge symbolic thing. And
Speaker 7: Kirk is very symbolic, and he had a huge influence
Speaker 7: on the young people, and he was silenced and it
Speaker 7: was a shot to the throat and all of the things,
Speaker 7: just all of the things, and I think hesher that
Speaker 7: we don't need all of the others. We don't need
Speaker 7: the candae owns and the tuck to be leaving the planet,
Speaker 7: although there may be some instances like that, but I
Speaker 7: think that's part of the plant. That might be like
Speaker 7: a bonus. People might be like, yeah, we didn't plan
Speaker 7: that one, but because there's always those types of things,
Speaker 7: but I think this was the one. This is all
Speaker 7: they needed because it's always just one thing, because that's simple,
Speaker 7: and you've got to keep repeating things over and over
Speaker 7: and over and over and over again. And then the
Speaker 7: biggest concern is why why are they are we still
Speaker 7: allowed to talk about Israel? Why is this allowed to
Speaker 7: be a topic. Why is this a thing? Why why
Speaker 7: so many obvious in your face? Why does like, like
Speaker 7: if if you were just sitting on the fence about
Speaker 7: this topic, all these things look ultra suspicious, Especially when
Speaker 7: net and Yahoo comes out. He's like, it wasn't us,
Speaker 7: it wasn't like and just.
Speaker 4: You don't do it.
Speaker 7: It was a weird, suspicious stuff that people are like, huh,
Speaker 7: that's kind of weird. I think they're doing that on purpose.
Speaker 4: Four times. He did it four times, and his first
Speaker 4: like social media post coincided to the exact minute Donald Trump,
Speaker 4: so like again, another massive coincidence. And the thing with
Speaker 4: things that are like labeled as coincidental, right, is they're unuseful.
Speaker 4: They're unuseful in finding the truth, because that's what a
Speaker 4: coincidence is. A coincidence is a synchronicity. A coincidence is
Speaker 4: something that we've all experienced. A coincidence is that deja
Speaker 4: vu moment or that hey, Ruckus and I were just
Speaker 4: talking about this the other day and here it is
Speaker 4: right in our face. Like it's almost like you could
Speaker 4: get paranoid about it and say, oh, I live in
Speaker 4: a simulation, or oh Jesus Christ put this in front
Speaker 4: of me, or oh the universe did this for us?
Speaker 4: Or are you you could just insert whatever, like you know,
Speaker 4: going back to the opening monologue that we're in a
Speaker 4: mad Libs world. Here we are in a fucking serious
Speaker 4: mad Libs reality where there are just underscores in the
Speaker 4: nouns and adjectives of a narrative and we can literally
Speaker 4: PLoP in whatever makes us feel best or whatever makes
Speaker 4: us angry the most. And that is totally avoidable by
Speaker 4: having a government that has something akin to a Smith
Speaker 4: Munt Act, which we don't have anymore. Right, that is,
Speaker 4: something akin to a constitutional republic that does not allow
Speaker 4: its mass media to be a cartel and to propagandize
Speaker 4: to its viewers. But we don't have that. That's not
Speaker 4: where we live right now. So again, is there a
Speaker 4: single theory that we can say, yeah, that one's bullshit
Speaker 4: based on X YC.
Speaker 7: I can I can anything in everything coming from the
Speaker 7: current administration, everything that comes out of the mouths of
Speaker 7: cash fetel. There we go on the Trump advance. If
Speaker 7: they are sitting in power and or there the mainstream
Speaker 7: media or they're the alternative big blue check marks on X.
Speaker 4: Nope, based on previous experience, right, based on not a
Speaker 4: political identification, not right, not left, based on previous experience.
Speaker 4: To go down that list that I already rattled off
Speaker 4: earlier and ended with, I could go on, I mean,
Speaker 4: mystical fair What do you think, man? Is there a
Speaker 4: single theory that can be discounted? I mean, Ruckus probably
Speaker 4: gave us the most sane thing that we could possibly
Speaker 4: think right there. If the government's telling you it, and
Speaker 4: the mass media cartel's telling you it, and the social
Speaker 4: media cartels are boosting it, it's probably fucking propaganda, all right.
Speaker 3: Second that, plus, if it's coming from baby.
Speaker 7: Ntoniell word to your mother, how do you know that
Speaker 7: they're lying because their lips are moving right?
Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly? And how how dissonant does this feel to
Speaker 4: people that really put their heart and their hopes in
Speaker 4: people like Dan Bongino, Cash Pattel, Pam Scam, Blondie, Donald
Speaker 4: Trump himself, you know what I mean? Like, this is
Speaker 4: a this is this one of the many tough pills
Speaker 4: that people that supported myself included to a to a
Speaker 4: very soft low percentage degree, you know, just as opposition
Speaker 4: to what I saw as something that was, you know,
Speaker 4: really terrible. But it doesn't break my heart because I
Speaker 4: knew this probably wasn't going to go well. I have
Speaker 4: no faith in any politician. I have faith in maybe
Speaker 4: ten representatives out of the entirety of Capitol Hill. That's
Speaker 4: like what one hundred and five hundred and thirty eight
Speaker 4: people or some shit like that, there are ten of
Speaker 4: them who don't take money from the APAC lobby. Think
Speaker 4: about that. You voted for those people. Do they represent you? Well,
Speaker 4: a lot of you didn't. If you watch this show,
Speaker 4: you probably didn't vote at all. But you know what
Speaker 4: I mean, the larger American public voted for these people
Speaker 4: to represent them, and they're sitting there, stuff in their
Speaker 4: pockets with stuff that Apak has given them, and going
Speaker 4: on struggle sessions at Auschwitz and going to the Kiss
Speaker 4: the Wall and showing up in these photos. Two hundred
Speaker 4: and fifty delegates, most of them are politicians from Capitol Hill.
Speaker 4: While they all want us to be fighting with each
Speaker 4: other about who killed Charlie Kirk, they're off on a
Speaker 4: private jet to Israel. How the fuck does that sit.
Speaker 6: Speak of a bullshit that comes out of the administration.
Speaker 6: Is it true that Cashpitl was in front of Congress
Speaker 6: and they said that Epstein did not traffic.
Speaker 4: Oh yeah, Thomas Massey fucking dressed him down. Dude. That
Speaker 4: was embarrassing. That was fucking embarrassing. And shouts out to
Speaker 4: Thomas Massey. He's one of those ten that won't take
Speaker 4: the fucking money, won't take the fucking shekels from another
Speaker 4: country that is running our country, or at least walking
Speaker 4: hand and slapping hand in glove in our country. We
Speaker 4: can argue about who's the hand and who's the glove,
Speaker 4: but it doesn't fucking matter much because it's sure as
Speaker 4: fuck isn't a make America Great or in America first
Speaker 4: paradigm at all. Yeah, Massy fucking handed it to him, dude.
Speaker 4: And I was excited for a second, but I couldn't
Speaker 4: even be excited until the end of the video because
Speaker 4: it was just like, I know this amounts to nothing.
Speaker 4: I know this amounts to fucking nothing. And that goes
Speaker 4: back to watching Dennis Cascinach talking at Jason Burmas's event
Speaker 4: that he was hosting, and it's just like Dennis Cascinach
Speaker 4: told everybody that was there that day, and if you
Speaker 4: watch that video, which again I recommend you do, Dennis
Speaker 4: Concinich said, I produced three hundred and fifty reports that
Speaker 4: I handed out to every member. I forget if he
Speaker 4: said Congress or Senate or both, every member about how
Speaker 4: Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction, and how
Speaker 4: our central Intelligence agency had no information about weapons of
Speaker 4: mass destruction. And what did they do? They signed the
Speaker 4: War Powers Act, They endorsed the uh Nist Report on
Speaker 4: nine to eleven, and they underscored the talking point that
Speaker 4: bb net and Yahoo brought to Congress and to the
Speaker 4: Senate saying that we have to take out Saddam Usin
Speaker 4: he has weapons of mass destruction. If we don't, there'll
Speaker 4: be another nine to eleven. And then after that, we
Speaker 4: need to work on Syria, we need to work on Lebanon,
Speaker 4: on Libya, we need to work on Iran ultimately, and
Speaker 4: look what's fucking happening. We're like three quarters of the
Speaker 4: way through their plan that they laid in our Capitol
Speaker 4: Hill twenty four years ago, twenty four fucking years ago.
Speaker 4: Actually even further back than that. They had to plant
Speaker 4: seeds for that a lot longer before that actually took place.
Speaker 4: Do we know what happened that day?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 4: Are there people with ideas about what happened that day. Yeah,
Speaker 4: that's what that conference was about. That's what those speaking
Speaker 4: events were about. So what's next? We didn't learn the lesson?
Speaker 4: After nine to eleven, we allowed our tax dollars and
Speaker 4: our soldiers to go to Iraq and then Afghanistan. And
Speaker 4: now look at the Middle East. Look at the pull
Speaker 4: out of Afghanistan. What did we get out of that? Seriously,
Speaker 4: what did we get? We got five thousand dead people
Speaker 4: out of the Iraq conflict. I don't know the numbers
Speaker 4: on Afghanistan, but it went for what twenty one years?
Speaker 4: Twenty two years? And then we just left all our shit.
Speaker 4: It's it's not good. It's not good. Our reputation as
Speaker 4: a country has been tarnished. I mean, Pharaoh, you could
Speaker 4: talk to this, your Egyptian What do you think people
Speaker 4: in the Middle East think about America after the last
Speaker 4: twenty four years, after nine to eleven happened?
Speaker 6: Well, I mean sadly, like, it's not just in the
Speaker 6: Middle East, it's everywhere in the world.
Speaker 4: I think we like, Yeah, the world stage, right, the
Speaker 4: world stage right.
Speaker 6: Now, everybody see us for who we are. We we
Speaker 6: are people who cannot be trusted. Right, nobody can trust
Speaker 6: our government. We tell people engage in negotiations we get
Speaker 6: them in one place, that we can send another country
Speaker 6: to bomb them. When you mentioned Katter, right, and what
Speaker 6: happened and even even that conference after Putin, like we said,
Speaker 6: was Trump and Alaska, Right, look what happened after right,
Speaker 6: he completely walked everything back. It just no, man, it's
Speaker 6: just it's it's a really complete joke right now. And
Speaker 6: I don't think there is a serious politician in US.
Speaker 6: I think everybody's Trump is trying to get as much
Speaker 6: as he can during his presidency so that he doesn't bust,
Speaker 6: you know, have the big buss. But Trump two point
Speaker 6: zero is going to be the biggest buss. There is
Speaker 6: a reason why they put them in power, and they
Speaker 6: allowed him to win in twenty twenty four. Right, These
Speaker 6: guys don't do anything like erratically. Right, They did not
Speaker 6: allow him twenty twenty twenty, but they let him win
Speaker 6: in twenty twenty four for a reason, right, Because I
Speaker 6: think twenty twenty four, this is coming a few years,
Speaker 6: is going to be the years when there will be
Speaker 6: a big economical reset, and when that happened, the government
Speaker 6: need to have certain controls in place right too, for
Speaker 6: what to be ready for whatever can result from that,
Speaker 6: right from civil standpoint, and I think that's part of
Speaker 6: what we're seeing right now is really preparation to this happening.
Speaker 6: And I know we've been talking about this for a while, right,
Speaker 6: but I think a lot of the foundation is being
Speaker 6: laid right now is when actually shit hit the fan.
Speaker 6: They need to have control over the populist That's that's
Speaker 6: what it is.
Speaker 4: And one of the best ways to have the control
Speaker 4: over the populace that have that is to have them
Speaker 4: fighting against amongst each other.
Speaker 6: Each other, that's right, right, because they don't want you
Speaker 6: to unite on the issues that actually important for everybody, right,
Speaker 6: They don't want that, and instead they want you to
Speaker 6: look at your neighbor.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, he's a lefty.
Speaker 6: You should not talk to him, right because once you
Speaker 6: talk to him and you realize, oh, ship, we actually
Speaker 6: have to have a function economy that actually benefits both
Speaker 6: of us, or we need to have a functional society
Speaker 6: with a set of you know, civil discourse.
Speaker 4: And an economy that benefits us, all and all that, yea,
Speaker 4: all that.
Speaker 7: This is a war. This is a war.
Speaker 3: This is a war.
Speaker 4: Hashtag civil war hashtag.
Speaker 7: They did it again, Alex Jones did the gay He's
Speaker 7: he's running around posting the propaganda in other people's posts.
Speaker 7: The guy's all over the place. He's literally, what did
Speaker 7: I see? Somebody was questioning why the widow Erica Kirk
Speaker 7: is doing a GoFundMe when the guy was worth like
Speaker 7: seven miller or whatever, right, and Alex Jones goes and
Speaker 7: trolls on the guy's post. He's like, no, it's because
Speaker 7: we're building a war chest. Because this is a war.
Speaker 7: This is a war. He said it like twice in
Speaker 7: the post comment. I think it's crazy.
Speaker 4: It's actually a really good question too that he brushed
Speaker 4: off and said, oh no, we're at war right now.
Speaker 4: Because I've got a clip somewhere in my bookmarks here.
Speaker 4: Maybe we'll get to it, maybe we won't.
Speaker 7: Yeah, they said it was a grift, and no, it's
Speaker 7: not a grift. That's a war chest fund.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 4: Check this out, man. Everybody is trying to make a
Speaker 4: dime off of this. It's insane. Like, I've got a
Speaker 4: video somewhere I've got saved, And it's this woman doing
Speaker 4: like a TikTok style video and she's exposing another woman.
Speaker 4: Get this, this is so meta. This is like double
Speaker 4: invert double inverted fart knocker dance from Beavis and butt Head.
Speaker 4: So this woman comes on social media and she's exposing
Speaker 4: another woman who is a known progressive leftist, for claiming
Speaker 4: that she got fired for celebrating Charlie Kirk's death. But
Speaker 4: as it turns out, she didn't have a job. She's
Speaker 4: just an influencer, and she set up a GoFundMe to
Speaker 4: fund herself by grifting, by saying, so like, there's people
Speaker 4: grifting on all sides, both sides, all ten sides, and
Speaker 4: as well as like outside of the trapezoid or the
Speaker 4: tetrahedron on this like finding like double inverted meta ways
Speaker 4: to try to profit off his death. And she made
Speaker 4: forty thousand dollars in a couple of days by claiming
Speaker 4: that she had lost her job as a leftist.
Speaker 7: Correct desk as to how I lost my job.
Speaker 4: We all got canceled and lost our jobs. Here in the.
Speaker 7: Boiler GoFundMe, dotcut rookies slash spoiler room.
Speaker 3: It's crazy, man. I commented on that.
Speaker 6: Actually co Stucker like basically like he he set up
Speaker 6: like a gofund me and I think it for a
Speaker 6: six million dollars or something like that. And back in
Speaker 6: a few days ago, I was like, why he's already
Speaker 6: a millionaire.
Speaker 4: Dude, right, Like, you can't break off you can't break
Speaker 4: off a million bucks for like what is with the
Speaker 4: GoFundMe thing Like Oprah and The Rock did the same
Speaker 4: thing after the Lahaina fires. It's like, wait a minute,
Speaker 4: you're smoothly trying to fucking everybody's setting up like people.
Speaker 6: People are stupid. Go give your money to people who
Speaker 6: are actually in need. I stopped doing that.
Speaker 4: I was not born with enough middle fingers for these
Speaker 4: people that are doing this shit. I mean I need
Speaker 4: all both of you guys's middle fingers and all of
Speaker 4: you out there in the audio, I mean so many
Speaker 4: middle fingers to that it's just like fuck you. And
Speaker 4: same with just trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
Speaker 4: I I do not have enough middle fingers to express
Speaker 4: how much fuck you I have for the mass media,
Speaker 4: for the government, for the intelligence agencies, double quadruple to infinity,
Speaker 4: fuck you. And all of our audience with their middle
Speaker 4: fingers up, fuck you for this, this is bullshit.
Speaker 7: Well, let's let's work them through. Let's let's do this
Speaker 7: the right way. And why don't we work them backwards?
Speaker 7: What do you think? Let's start with the new ship,
Speaker 7: like the like, with the text, the messages, the alleged messages.
Speaker 7: Oh God, from this, the killer and his lover.
Speaker 4: The text messages. Okay, this is fantastic, all right. First off,
Speaker 4: I as soon as we closed the show last week,
Speaker 4: keep in mind last week's show, if you've not watched
Speaker 4: it or heard it yet, if you go back and
Speaker 4: watch or listen to it, you will hear us just
Speaker 4: slightly more than twenty four hours after the event, dealing
Speaker 4: with what we had at the time. We closed that
Speaker 4: show down around midnight Central time. I immediately went and
Speaker 4: passed out. I try to edit the shows after the
Speaker 4: show and get the audio pod up as soon as
Speaker 4: I can. Frankly, the audio pod from last week is
Speaker 4: not up because when I woke up the next day,
Speaker 4: I started seeing supplemental information. It all started fucking coming in,
Speaker 4: and I sat and I watched the entire FBI slash
Speaker 4: Utah Governor slash Utah law Enforcement press conference, and I
Speaker 4: put that on there. And then I went to X
Speaker 4: and I started seeing all of the things that were
Speaker 4: talking about tonight roll into my feed, and I started
Speaker 4: dumping all those I've been putting supplemental links on last
Speaker 4: week's show for a week, and on top of that,
Speaker 4: I have been building bookmarks for this week's show to
Speaker 4: the point where when we went live tonight, I scrolled
Speaker 4: through them and it's a mile long. Is an absolute
Speaker 4: mile long. I would need artificial intelligence or two weeks
Speaker 4: to go through what I've collected in this one week
Speaker 4: by hand and organize it in a way that is meaningful.
Speaker 4: And I said, fuck it, fuck it, I'm in the
Speaker 4: same position you are out there. I'm in the exact
Speaker 4: same position you are. I am drinking from a fire hose.
Speaker 4: I'm trying to not let my emotions play in. I'm
Speaker 4: trying to let my not let my imagination run wild.
Speaker 4: I'm trying to not let my biases filter what I'm thinking.
Speaker 4: And that's from coming from someone who's got more than
Speaker 4: a decade of reading media, tea leaves, busting propaganda, looking
Speaker 4: for lies, learning to think like Colombo or Sherlock and
Speaker 4: we're screwed. So that's why what I have to say
Speaker 4: tonight is I just don't have enough middle fingers for
Speaker 4: the narrative managers out there and the grifters out there,
Speaker 4: Grift World order.
Speaker 7: Do you do you have the text message? I have it.
Speaker 4: I have it somewhere, but if you want to link
Speaker 4: it to me in the chat, I'll uh.
Speaker 7: Oh no, no, no, this is the Okay, I'll put
Speaker 7: it up with just to be clear people, because I
Speaker 7: don't want to get in trouble. Just it's just this
Speaker 7: is just for fun, okay. So so this this is
Speaker 7: this is the alleged the release of the conversation between
Speaker 7: the alleged killer and his allegedmate slash lover. Hello, Ramate
Speaker 7: and Lover. It is I Tyler James Robinson. Hello Tyler
Speaker 7: James Robinson. As a reminder, my pro nines are she
Speaker 7: they You're never going to believe what I did. I
Speaker 7: was the one who killed Charlie Kirk. What, Yes, I
Speaker 7: did it. Let me tell you all of the details
Speaker 7: here in writing so that you know everything, but you
Speaker 7: need to promise me you will never show this chat
Speaker 7: to anyone, particularly the FBI, which is much better run
Speaker 7: now that cash Ftel is in charge. Yes, I promise,
Speaker 7: please start at the beginning and spare no detail. Okay, Well,
Speaker 7: I started planning in ernest approximately one week ago. I
Speaker 7: did very detailed reconnaissance of the site, which I learned
Speaker 7: how to do so during Anti Foot boot camp. But
Speaker 7: why did you do it? What would you say? Your
Speaker 7: motive was? Well, roommate lover, as you know, I have
Speaker 7: been radicalized online by leftist propaganda and I had to
Speaker 7: use violence to suppress respeech. I don't agree with as
Speaker 7: is our way now. Asdiculous as that sounds, I promise
Speaker 7: you the legitimate one that the FBI is trying to
Speaker 7: convince you actually took place is even more ridiculous.
Speaker 4: Yeah, dude, And they're saying that a lot of some
Speaker 4: of these conversations went down on the way. Yeah, it's
Speaker 4: fucking Could it be more fake? Pharaoh? I mean, who
Speaker 4: talks like that? Name something? Do you know a twenty
Speaker 4: two year old that talks like that? Do you know
Speaker 4: a fifty year old that talks like that?
Speaker 5: Well?
Speaker 3: No, I think this image is not I think this
Speaker 3: is not true.
Speaker 7: Yes, I said that this joke right, But I'm My
Speaker 7: point is, is the real one sounds just as ridiculous.
Speaker 3: Yeah, absolutely, absolutely.
Speaker 4: The one that the one that Crowder put out last
Speaker 4: week while we were doing the show. That's the one
Speaker 4: that this is clowning on. And it's like almost no different,
Speaker 4: you know what I mean, Like the satire of that
Speaker 4: is exactly like if we were to get serious and
Speaker 4: go back to the one that Crowder put out, which
Speaker 4: by the way, was from an unknown source and passed
Speaker 4: around as like breaking exclusive news from an ATF he
Speaker 4: claimed from an ATF person, and we just have to
Speaker 4: take his word, you know. I'm sure he has a
Speaker 4: lot of people coming at him. Maybe they are from
Speaker 4: the fucking ATF. I don't know, But how easy is
Speaker 4: that to spoof whatever? But like if you look at
Speaker 4: the things that they claim were actual text exchange, they're
Speaker 4: using words that normal people don't use, Like a law
Speaker 4: enforcement person. Here's an example, just just one of many.
Speaker 4: If you're in law enforcement, you sovereign citizens know what
Speaker 4: I'm talking about. You don't refer to a car as
Speaker 4: a car. You call it a vehicle. You always always
Speaker 4: if you're a law enforcement officer out here and you
Speaker 4: agree with me or disagree with me put it in
Speaker 4: the comments below. Please you always write it in your
Speaker 4: report as a vehicle. This may sound trivial. Some people
Speaker 4: are going, why the fuck is he splitting hairs between
Speaker 4: car and vehicle? Because the criminal code has a lot
Speaker 4: to do with vehicles, not cars, not methods of transportation,
Speaker 4: not scooters, not pickup trucks, vehicles. I don't know anybody
Speaker 4: that refers to their car as their vehicle.
Speaker 3: Yeah, is a gen z.
Speaker 4: Will come on, man, they don't drive cars.
Speaker 3: Right, so he can you open that tweet I posted
Speaker 3: for me?
Speaker 5: For me?
Speaker 3: So what I did is I took that Actually what
Speaker 3: the FBI listed here? Posted the link again?
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, I got it.
Speaker 3: Let's see, and I give it to Shad Jippity.
Speaker 4: A lot of people doing this. Yeah, this is this
Speaker 4: is uh, this is actually really good. Uh let me see.
Speaker 4: Can I get this a little bigger? Oh that's hell
Speaker 4: a small read us what's in there?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 6: So basically I give it to it and say, hey,
Speaker 6: read this and tell me if it sounds like creal
Speaker 6: text exchange between your boyfriend and girlfriend or more like
Speaker 6: a fabricated narrative and the answer or I have read
Speaker 6: the text in the image here are some observation that
Speaker 6: may help answer your question why it feels more like
Speaker 6: a fabricated narrative. Narrative right, and the first thing is
Speaker 6: overly detailed confusion. Real text exchange, especially in sinisitive or
Speaker 6: incriminating context, are usually fragmented, vague, and shorthand Here Robinson
Speaker 6: gives lengthy, almost story like explanations convenient exposition. The dial
Speaker 6: agerees like it's written to reveal plot point, right, so it's.
Speaker 4: A rifle hidden. Why they did it, how long they've.
Speaker 3: Play exactly exactly, So it's pretty gay.
Speaker 4: I'm fake, is totally fake and gay. I mean we
Speaker 4: were laughing about it in our back chat. We have
Speaker 4: a back chat obviously here in the Social Rejects club
Speaker 4: because we've been rejected by so many people, not you,
Speaker 4: of course, where we share links throughout the week and
Speaker 4: we have just been like, I don't know, just this
Speaker 4: like gallows humor in that room almost it's like, can
Speaker 4: you even believe that shit like this is elevating to
Speaker 4: the top of you know, social media right now? It's
Speaker 4: it's insane. What do you got up there? Ruckus?
Speaker 7: This is the alleged real exchange that's the other link
Speaker 7: that's in the private chat. It's it's halfway down the
Speaker 7: Newsweek article. But yeah, you'll see that language. Like the
Speaker 7: one that I said was a joke. You'll see that
Speaker 7: they this is why they was joking, like that is
Speaker 7: because he said things like I'm still okay, my love.
Speaker 7: That was this is what the FBI really released apparently okay.
Speaker 7: And then also what you were talking about Pharaoh was
Speaker 7: like why did Literally the guy's like, why did you
Speaker 7: do it? And then so that his boyfriend or whatever
Speaker 7: says why and then he says, why did I do it? Yeah?
Speaker 7: I had enough of this hatred or his hatred. Some
Speaker 7: hate can't be negotiated out. What and then hasher to
Speaker 7: your point that I know we're going to get into too,
Speaker 7: is about the rifle. I'm wishing I had circled back
Speaker 7: and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle.
Speaker 7: I'm worried what my old man would do if I
Speaker 7: didn't bring back Grandpa's right. And then and then I
Speaker 7: think this was way to get better. I don't know
Speaker 7: if it had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace
Speaker 7: to me. I worry about Prince. I had to leave
Speaker 7: it in a bush where I eat it out with fits.
Speaker 7: Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with
Speaker 7: like we didn't, but he had plenty of time to
Speaker 7: disassemble that fucker shot it down his pants and then
Speaker 7: reassemble it again, wrap it inside a towel and leave
Speaker 7: it in the bush right after changing.
Speaker 4: So fucking stupid. And to make this even even better,
Speaker 4: and and Candace laid this out really good. She spent
Speaker 4: a lot of time on her Monday show this week
Speaker 4: talking about the outfits. It gets even better. He showed
Speaker 4: up if I recall in a maroon shirt and gray shorts.
Speaker 4: That's the first time like she she did Candace. Actually,
Speaker 4: I almost feel like Candace watched the show this last
Speaker 4: week and like started picking apart our taxonomy for the
Speaker 4: Daily Shooter program, but because she used it. But at
Speaker 4: this point it's, you know, it should be common knowledge
Speaker 4: anyways for a reporter journalist type person. But anyway, she's
Speaker 4: going through the timeline and she brought all the like,
Speaker 4: you know, like we got a receipt on screen right now,
Speaker 4: Ruckus has it right there. You can see it highlighted
Speaker 4: on his screen and on mine. But she started talking
Speaker 4: about the outfits and she did a really good timeline
Speaker 4: of the outfits, and it was like he showed up
Speaker 4: at a certain point in the morning. I don't have
Speaker 4: the timeline in front of me, so I'll refer to
Speaker 4: her defer to her for that. But anyways, shows up
Speaker 4: in a shirt more colored, more like Ruckus's shirt right there,
Speaker 4: Where were you that morning? Rugas? Anyway, and then when
Speaker 4: the event happens, he's wearing the black shirt with the
Speaker 4: American flag on it, right, and then changes his outfit
Speaker 4: as stated in that text message there. But when they
Speaker 4: arrested him thirty three hours later, he was in the
Speaker 4: black shirt again. So it's like, what the fuck is
Speaker 4: going on here? They're saying this guy did three outfit
Speaker 4: changes and ultimate changed back into the outfit that he
Speaker 4: escaped the crime scene in.
Speaker 7: What is one of those quick change artist magician people.
Speaker 7: You've seen those guys?
Speaker 4: Yeah, they do the like the they pull the like
Speaker 4: uh you know, the silk shroud down and their outfit
Speaker 4: changes automatically. Yeah, seen it. Old trick reality.
Speaker 7: TV change, That's what it's called. Some people are really
Speaker 7: good at that. I've seen some stuff. I'm like, damn,
Speaker 7: how did they do that?
Speaker 4: Yeah? Right, I don't know and the other thing about that.
Speaker 4: Maybe this is a good time to bring this clip
Speaker 4: into the mix.
Speaker 2: Here.
Speaker 4: Oh, I opened my Instagram and there's Stage Morrison right
Speaker 4: at the top making sure people know.
Speaker 7: If it's one about the gun, because that's where I
Speaker 7: wanted to Yeah it is, yeah, Okay, it's related to
Speaker 7: the outfit because the out no matter what outfit he
Speaker 7: was wearing, does not accommodate his grandpa's precious mouthfle.
Speaker 4: Where's Grandpa's rifles? Son? Okay, let me put this on
Speaker 4: the screen here, share this tab and turn the missa.
Speaker 7: By the way, the scope, would you say, that's a
Speaker 7: two thousand dollars.
Speaker 4: Scope on on the one we saw the picture of
Speaker 4: or the one I'm about to show.
Speaker 7: The one on the picture from the FBI. No, that's
Speaker 7: what the kids said. The kids said that. He says,
Speaker 7: judging from today, I'd say Grandpa's gun does just fine.
Speaker 7: I don't know. I think that was a two K
Speaker 7: scope a two thousand dollars sign and then so but
Speaker 7: he but he doesn't know if the vehicle had I mean,
Speaker 7: the the weapon had a serial number, but he knows
Speaker 7: how much the scope costs.
Speaker 4: Okay, Like, are you are you fucking kidding me, Like,
Speaker 4: this is a family heirloom, This is grandpa's rifle, and
Speaker 4: the scope that grandpa put on it cost two thousand dollars?
Speaker 4: Are you fucking joking me? Like I've got a Vortex
Speaker 4: HD three. I think on one of my ar that's
Speaker 4: a fucking two thousand dollars scope. I don't think a
Speaker 4: two thousand dollars scope existed when that rifle was purchased. Okay,
Speaker 4: Like on today's prices, yeah, you can get a two
Speaker 4: to ten thousand dollars scope depending on what your what
Speaker 4: your application is. Uh. But yeah, to think that grandpa's heritage,
Speaker 4: you know, heirloom rifle from you know, designed in nineteen
Speaker 4: oh three, had a two thousand dollars scope on it,
Speaker 4: highly highly fucking unlikely. Okay, let's see here. Let me
Speaker 4: put this on the screen. A lot of people have
Speaker 4: been talking about this. Some of you may have seen
Speaker 4: this already, some of you may have not. I'm going
Speaker 4: to refresh this and turn the audio on in a
Speaker 4: minute here, But what you're gonna see here as an
Speaker 4: analysis from a guy that owns I believe he has
Speaker 4: the Springfield version of this rifle. Like if I'm not
Speaker 4: mistaken Springfield sort of Springfield sort of updated this. Uh
Speaker 4: this f I arm But I really don't know for sure,
Speaker 4: So somebody might know better than me. Leave us some
Speaker 4: info in the comments. But the reason I'm going to
Speaker 4: show this you can see it on the screen right
Speaker 4: now if you're watching. It's got a sort of a
Speaker 4: transcript that runs under it, TikTok style. But this guy
Speaker 4: owns a modern version of this rifle. His looks like
Speaker 4: he knows how to use it. His looks like he's
Speaker 4: taking it down and put it back together many times before.
Speaker 4: He does it very fast. It's an experienced person with
Speaker 4: this platform. We're to believe that a twenty two year
Speaker 4: old who does not have much experience with this platform,
Speaker 4: who just pulls grandpa's archaic thirty o six out of
Speaker 4: his dad's collection or his dad's safe and pulled this off.
Speaker 4: So let's watch.
Speaker 10: This is the rifle into a backpack, and this is it.
Speaker 4: Let me refresh that sucker.
Speaker 10: On this episode. If you might be a dumb motherfucker,
Speaker 10: this is my rifle. It takes two different tools to
Speaker 10: take it apart. Takes a Torus key and an Allen key. Now,
Speaker 10: if I take a shot and immediately disassemble this. I
Speaker 10: have to remove the bolt, remove the magazine, grab my
Speaker 10: allen key, hit the two bolts on the bottom, put
Speaker 10: those away in the Allen key, Grab my torks key,
Speaker 10: remove the scope, put everything in the backpack, make sure
Speaker 10: I have everything, and make my way downtown, okay, which
Speaker 10: is going to take a lot longer for him than
Speaker 10: it is for me, especially because his fine tune motor function.
Speaker 10: Something as simple as grabbing an Allen key to a
Speaker 10: little bowl, it's going to be extremely impaired due to
Speaker 10: a dump of adrenaline throughout his bloodstream an extreme elevated
Speaker 10: heart rate is going to make these fine tuned skills
Speaker 10: extremely difficult. I mean, just for him to think and
Speaker 10: analyze of what needs to be done to disassemble this
Speaker 10: rifle and get away would be difficult. You're not beginning
Speaker 10: to touch the topic of him assembling the rifle on
Speaker 10: top of the roof, which if you reassemble a rifle
Speaker 10: and you take a cold dead shot, it's not going
Speaker 10: to be one hundred percent accurate, okay, Or the fact
Speaker 10: that he disassembled this after taking a shot, which the
Speaker 10: rifle's going to be up and they found no gloves.
Speaker 10: There's just so many inconsistencies that just makes zero sense.
Speaker 10: I mean, I'm still working on this, and I have
Speaker 10: taken this rifle apart thousand times, and now he has
Speaker 10: to put the pieces of the rifle into a backpack.
Speaker 10: And this is a gigantic backpack that wolf pack, best
Speaker 10: backpacks on the fucking planet. Anyways, as you can see,
Speaker 10: this barrel broken down does not fit in this backpack.
Speaker 10: And this is a big boy, way bigger than one
Speaker 10: he was carrying. Okay, I put the rifle stock in here,
Speaker 10: and guess what, it doesn't fit.
Speaker 3: It sticks out.
Speaker 1: Now, let's just say, for sake of.
Speaker 10: Argument, that he put these in his paint like and
Speaker 10: he was walking. These are still so long broken down
Speaker 10: that he would not be able to walk straight.
Speaker 7: He wouldn't be able to bend his legs.
Speaker 4: Doesn't make sense. All right, I'm gonna mute it right
Speaker 4: there for you audio listeners. You're welcome. But he's showing
Speaker 4: you right now the person running off the roof, the
Speaker 4: person jumping off the roof, and some video footage of
Speaker 4: the alleged suspect walking up dares and such. There's nothing
Speaker 4: poking out of his backpack. There's nothing hampering him from
Speaker 4: walking up a set of stairs, which that barrel would
Speaker 4: absolutely hamper you from walking upstairs.
Speaker 7: Shoved it up this bummon.
Speaker 4: Yeah, he put it in the old prison coin purse.
Speaker 3: Guys. Remember he's ditting a tranny, so he's used to that.
Speaker 4: Oh dude, they'll get us canceled. No, uh, it's ridiculous.
Speaker 4: It's ridiculous. One of my favorite pieces of footage that
Speaker 4: I saw after last night's show Ruck. I think Ruck
Speaker 4: has picked it up around the same time I did.
Speaker 4: We both like we're like, oh my god, have you
Speaker 4: seen this? Was Michael Savage. Michael Savage's comments on this
Speaker 4: were bombastic and fantastic. Mister bombastic, mister fantastic. Michael Savage
Speaker 4: was like, this is bullshit. He was so like, no
Speaker 4: punches pulled. That was one of the first ones that
Speaker 4: I saw when I woke up that next day after
Speaker 4: last week's show.
Speaker 7: To be fair, he's just saying like what any average
Speaker 7: normal person with half a fucking brain would say. Yeah,
Speaker 7: to be honest, so it's like it's like, it's really
Speaker 7: technically nothing that fantastic about it. I guess this shot like,
Speaker 7: oh look, one of those those s tier level or
Speaker 7: whatever tier we're putting these people in actually pulled their
Speaker 7: head out of their ass and it's actually saying the
Speaker 7: thing I guess, But again, anyone with half a brain
Speaker 7: should be saying and you know, feeling like that guy.
Speaker 4: And I think that is such a huge part of
Speaker 4: the population right now, and that's the one thing that's
Speaker 4: you know, I guess cool about this. But at the
Speaker 4: same time, it's kind of like it's a little late
Speaker 4: for you to be hopping on the media skepticism train.
Speaker 4: You're about ten years, twenty years, thirty years late.
Speaker 7: And it books the shit out of me that the
Speaker 7: people like the days and the people in the administration
Speaker 7: and the media and all the people doing all the things,
Speaker 7: they're not stupid, and they know what they're doing. They
Speaker 7: know what this looks like. They know how we're going
Speaker 7: to react. They know that by doing this they are
Speaker 7: radicalizing us into thinking these things. So like so it
Speaker 7: just it drives me crazy.
Speaker 4: Here you go, Yeah, yeah, let's play it. This is
Speaker 4: worth playing.
Speaker 7: This is from my microphone, by the way, dude.
Speaker 4: Bit anyway, Yeah, looks familiar. Anyways, This is from I
Speaker 4: think September twelfth, last week, like Friday last week, something.
Speaker 11: Like that, something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this.
Speaker 11: I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI,
Speaker 11: the MAGA FBI. Something's very wrong with what I just heard.
Speaker 11: I mean, I watched it. I was hoping that they
Speaker 11: had caught the bastard who shot Charlie. So we saw
Speaker 11: a video of a person jumping off the roof. It
Speaker 11: look very legitimate to me. However, there was no rifle
Speaker 11: in his hand. Now, the Mauser does not break down
Speaker 11: very easily. Incidentally, for those of you who know weapons,
Speaker 11: something's wrong with the whole thing. They're trying to claim
Speaker 11: he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the
Speaker 11: receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants,
Speaker 11: like all in two seconds. It is not easy to
Speaker 11: remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and
Speaker 11: remain accurate. We are not hearing of seeing reality. And
Speaker 11: by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left
Speaker 11: in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed
Speaker 11: to believe a guy is on the run after killing
Speaker 11: Charlie Kirk and he pauses in the woods to reinstall
Speaker 11: a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find,
Speaker 11: the FBI to find. I don't believe a word of it.
Speaker 11: I shouldn't do this. I know I'm putting myself at risk,
Speaker 11: but I can't take it anymore. I can't take the
Speaker 11: bullshit from this fucking government. It's lying to us. Something's wrong,
Speaker 11: something's so wrong, it's sickening. Look at this idiot. They
Speaker 11: found the rifle and they're getting the prints. Are you stupid?
Speaker 11: Are you that stupid? Are you that dumb? The man
Speaker 11: jumps off the roof. There's no rifle there. Oh, it's
Speaker 11: in his backpack. I just told you, moron, that this
Speaker 11: rifle doesn't break down it easily, and then it's supposed
Speaker 11: to be reassembled.
Speaker 1: While he's on the runway.
Speaker 11: I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in
Speaker 11: the woods in a box, wrapped in a towel.
Speaker 4: He left breadcrumbs. Oh and the trans anti. Yeah, like
Speaker 4: like he's gonna stop and you just saw someone disassemble
Speaker 4: that right, Like he's gonna do that on the rooftop.
Speaker 4: Run into the woods, get those two tools out, the
Speaker 4: HECKX wrench and the driver. Put it back together in
Speaker 4: the Woods while he's running away after committing the highest
Speaker 4: profile murder of the century.
Speaker 11: Okay, sure, the trans stuff on the Cottridges bullshit, something
Speaker 11: is wrong with this whole fucking picture. I have persona
Speaker 11: on grata in this White House. I will tell you
Speaker 11: right now. I flew with Donald Trump in FS one.
Speaker 11: I consider him close to me. I have not been
Speaker 11: able to get near him since this administration took hold.
Speaker 11: They have thrown me out, They've castigated throw me in
Speaker 11: the desert. They don't want me near them. They don't
Speaker 11: want real truth tellers near them. Sean Hannity immediately that
Speaker 11: pimp scumbag goes on the air and repeats the government lie.
Speaker 11: That lousy son of a bitch. How the fuck does
Speaker 11: Sean Hannity he lived with himself? What would you just prove?
Speaker 11: And you have the Sean you know what apt animal?
Speaker 11: You're like a whore kept in a Sean Hannity, You've
Speaker 11: always been a whore in a brothel. You have hit
Speaker 11: a new loan, Hannity, and something is wrong. Somebody killed
Speaker 11: this young guy and everyone is asking who done it?
Speaker 11: And we're supposed to believe they think we're this stupid.
Speaker 11: So Cash Betellers there, he doesn't say a word, and
Speaker 11: Donald Trump's in the Yankee Stadium.
Speaker 4: What the hell is going on here?
Speaker 11: I'm just an American citizen who's been in the business
Speaker 11: of observing since I'm eighteen years old, and I don't
Speaker 11: buy one word of this narrative.
Speaker 4: Not let yeah, not one single word. And all I
Speaker 4: can say is word to your mother, Michael Savage, like
Speaker 4: I love how he got real deep in the microphone
Speaker 4: there when he said scumbag, scumbag. That's so good, so good,
Speaker 4: little microphone excellence.
Speaker 7: And you'll notice there will be continued arguments about who
Speaker 7: killed him, how he was killed, and it will not
Speaker 7: be discussed, or not be allowed to, but only discussed
Speaker 7: in certain circles that he wasn't even killed.
Speaker 4: This is a mess. This is a total mess. And
Speaker 4: the fact that everything we've talked about, the wife going
Speaker 4: on within twenty four hours, cash Betel going on within
Speaker 4: thirty three hours, everything has a fucking bow put on
Speaker 4: it within less than thirty six hours. And what have
Speaker 4: we been talking about here in the boiler room for
Speaker 4: weeks and weeks now it looks like they're putting bows
Speaker 4: on all the conspiracies as though, something is about to
Speaker 4: shift to.
Speaker 7: What's with the funeral?
Speaker 5: Then?
Speaker 7: Why would let's be sensible, Let's say, okay, somebody did
Speaker 7: this crazy guy shot and killed Charlie? Why do we
Speaker 7: rush the funeral so quickly? How do we rush the funeral?
Speaker 7: Is it because he had the seven million dollars?
Speaker 4: Is there?
Speaker 7: I mean, what's what's the mad rush here? What's going
Speaker 7: on with that? I mean, what's any I don't see
Speaker 7: any logical explanation for this. I'm open to suggestions. If
Speaker 7: anyone's got on.
Speaker 4: I got nothing. I have not been given anything. I
Speaker 4: can go on.
Speaker 7: Okay, all right, then let's go even closer to the event,
Speaker 7: and I guess than the crime scene, so we can
Speaker 7: all agree a crime took place, right at least we're
Speaker 7: we're I mean, that's the mainstream story here is that somebody,
Speaker 7: this guy Tyler, shot and killed Charlie Robinson. So after
Speaker 7: somebody is shot and killed, what do we usually see
Speaker 7: happening around these places that the crime took you know, happened?
Speaker 4: Oh? Well, I got the answer. I mean, Pharaoh probably
Speaker 4: does too, right, like we do. What the one thing
Speaker 4: that we see on crime shows gordon off the area?
Speaker 3: No, I thought that we cleaned the area from evidence.
Speaker 4: Oh right, we destroy it, We destroyed the crime scene. No,
Speaker 4: actually no, that's the opposite of what you know. As
Speaker 4: much as we hate being programmed by television and movies,
Speaker 4: that is the absolute opposite. That is the one thing
Speaker 4: that is true when it comes to television and movies.
Speaker 4: The cordon off. They tape off the crime scene. It's
Speaker 4: taped off for weeks in many cases. Pharaoh, I know
Speaker 4: you gotta get out of here soon, man.
Speaker 6: Yeah, sorry, guys, I gotta I gotta jump out. But
Speaker 6: it was really nice. Yeah everybody, I love you all
Speaker 6: and I'll see you next week.
Speaker 4: Yeah, man, thanks for joining us. Really appreciate you being
Speaker 4: here tonight. And we're gonna wrap it up soon, so
Speaker 4: probably good time for you to bounce out. We can
Speaker 4: start cycling out of here. But yeah, there he goes.
Speaker 4: That's mystical, Pharaoh. Everybody bouncing out of the boiler room.
Speaker 7: Just say, then, let's see you because I did it.
Speaker 7: We're doing the Quentin Tarantino thing, working from that, you know, backward.
Speaker 7: So again, if the text is fake and gay and gay,
Speaker 7: if the if the quite literally right, uh, the patsy
Speaker 7: is fake and gay. Right, the whole gun story, right,
Speaker 7: the whole funeral set up was pretty fake and pretty gay.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and a lot of people's estimation, at.
Speaker 7: Least so the way the whole crime scene things pretty
Speaker 7: fake and gay.
Speaker 4: Uh yeah, no bullets yet, no picture.
Speaker 7: I don't know. Is it really any stretch of the
Speaker 7: imagination to suggest that the event itself is also pretty
Speaker 7: fake and gay?
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 7: Okay, cool, I mean question.
Speaker 4: I'm going to answer that question with a question that
Speaker 4: Charlie Robinson sorry, shouts out to our friend Charlie Robbins. Hey, man,
Speaker 4: I mean that was really bad Freudian right there. I'm sorry, Charlie.
Speaker 4: I will respond with a classic line from our friend
Speaker 4: Charlie Kirk. Not really our friend. We don't know him,
Speaker 4: but proved me wrong. Is that Crowder or is that Kirk?
Speaker 4: They both kind of do the same thing. But you know,
Speaker 4: it's the debate thing Charlie Kirk, if I understood his
Speaker 4: personality well enough. Again, I don't know him. I know
Speaker 4: people that know him, so it was ruckus. We've been
Speaker 4: talking to them. We've been hearing a lot of stuff.
Speaker 4: Some of it dovetails with some of the theories that
Speaker 4: you're hearing. I don't know what to say beyond that,
Speaker 4: I don't want to get into I'll leave the uh
Speaker 4: I knew him, and here's what's going on. I'll leave
Speaker 4: that to Candace Owens. I guess see how well that
Speaker 4: treats her. But his whole thing was debate me. That
Speaker 4: was his entire that was his existence, that was his
Speaker 4: swim lane, that was his you know, avenue was debate me.
Speaker 4: Let's talk about it. So forgive us if we've offended anyone,
Speaker 4: but in the spirit that Charlie Kirk would have, he
Speaker 4: would want an open discussion about this. And you should
Speaker 4: really think about it as a red flag when you
Speaker 4: see people that want to shut you down for having
Speaker 4: the discussion. What else to say about it than that.
Speaker 7: Well, you know how they canceled that South Park episode
Speaker 7: or whatever.
Speaker 4: Yeah, our favorite one episode three of this season.
Speaker 7: I forget who it was specifically, but somebody who represents
Speaker 7: Turning Point USA or somebody came out and they said
Speaker 7: that they that's they suggested that they say, hey, you
Speaker 7: should not you should have the episode come back, and
Speaker 7: they quoted because they it was somebody close to Charlie
Speaker 7: and said that he really liked that episode, and that
Speaker 7: he would if he was here, he would want them
Speaker 7: to keep that episode up. So I think they're going
Speaker 7: to put the episode back up. So yeah, that's really
Speaker 7: that's cool, that's a good that's a step in the
Speaker 7: right direction. Everybody.
Speaker 4: I can personally vouch for that too. I know someone
Speaker 4: that works at rav so.
Speaker 7: A Master Debater episode.
Speaker 4: A Master Debater episode. Charlie loved it. He absolutely loved
Speaker 4: that episode. I know this. I know this secondhand. So
Speaker 4: I'm not going to start, you know, giving receipts.
Speaker 7: You know, you're somebody and you're somebody important if they're
Speaker 7: making fun of you on South Park.
Speaker 4: Right, fucking a dude, fucking a and uh, he would
Speaker 4: have been so disappointed. I would wager that he would
Speaker 4: have been so disappointed that they took that off streaming
Speaker 4: or whatever. And I heard today that it's still on streaming,
Speaker 4: so if you're on Paramount Plus, apparently you can still
Speaker 4: watch it. I'll try to verify that later, but it's
Speaker 4: neither here nor there for tonight's discussion and owns Comedy Central,
Speaker 4: and they basically said we're not airing this one anymore,
Speaker 4: so they may not air it on boomer cable television.
Speaker 4: But I think it's still out there on the streaming
Speaker 4: services and it's been reposted on Twitch and all these
Speaker 4: other places. You can definitely watch it.
Speaker 7: I think they'll be they'll feel pressured to be like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 7: we got to do it in his honor. You know,
Speaker 7: they're like, we got to cancel this because of Charlie.
Speaker 7: But then Charlie is like speaking to them from up
Speaker 7: there or whatever, and he's saying, no, I like it,
Speaker 7: Like we got to bring it back for Charlie. And
Speaker 7: then like, so there's going to be a lot of
Speaker 7: this we got to do it for Charlie kind of stuff.
Speaker 7: They really they really martyred to this guy.
Speaker 4: Maybe they can put it in Jimmy Kimmel's slot.
Speaker 7: Dude, there you go. Well, I think they are doing
Speaker 7: some some Kirk stuff in the Kimmel's spot. What was
Speaker 7: I going to say? Oh, okay, so we were just
Speaker 7: just having fun, just doing the boiler room thing, just
Speaker 7: being ruckus. Guys, don't get mad. Send me hate mail
Speaker 7: if you want. I don't care, Send me love mail
Speaker 7: if you want. It's Ruckus at Alternate Current Radio dot com.
Speaker 7: Of course. But here's the thing. Like, if you really
Speaker 7: want to know what I truly believe, honestly do Rucas,
Speaker 7: You're crazy. Do you really believe that Charlie Kirk wasn't
Speaker 7: really killed and that the Freemasons did it? I'm like,
Speaker 7: here's what I truly honestly believe is I don't have
Speaker 7: a fucking clue because I wasn't there, and I can't
Speaker 7: do what I truly, honestly do believe. And I really
Speaker 7: want all you guys to do the same is you
Speaker 7: can't believe anything. Don't believe anything until you can prove
Speaker 7: it for yourself with your own research. But again, you know,
Speaker 7: somebody put a gun against my head and said, hey,
Speaker 7: out of all these theories, which one do you pick,
Speaker 7: I'm really gonna jump down the rabbit hole and say, yeah,
Speaker 7: I know he's he's living it up somewhere, drinking to
Speaker 7: Margarita on a beach or something with Epstein and Elvis
Speaker 7: or whatever. The other thing is, all that aside doesn't
Speaker 7: ultimately matter. And that's the biggest problem here, and that's
Speaker 7: the biggest point is it does not matter who killed him,
Speaker 7: It doesn't matter how he was killed, It doesn't matter
Speaker 7: any of these conspiracy theories that led up to this
Speaker 7: point where we are right here and right now, which
Speaker 7: is what we were discussing on. The last episode hasher
Speaker 7: with everybody at h O's throats, and so far we
Speaker 7: made it. We haven't had like any crazy civil war
Speaker 7: thing take place yet knock on wood. But that's what
Speaker 7: we need to we need to be most mindful of
Speaker 7: and be very careful of, is to avoid the yeah
Speaker 7: that we don't We don't need it. We don't need
Speaker 7: anybody to pop off, We don't need anybody to be
Speaker 7: trigger happy or whatever it is. Amusing metaphors here, but
Speaker 7: like right now, it's like everybody's on edge. The last
Speaker 7: thing we need right now is any other type of
Speaker 7: like event or a black Swan thing, or it would
Speaker 7: be a really bad time for them to do the
Speaker 7: cyber polygon and everybody's in the dark with no Internet.
Speaker 7: I'm just saying, yeah, like that movie, right or whatever.
Speaker 7: So I'm just yeah, I just hold on to your butts.
Speaker 7: I think they got something planned for us for October,
Speaker 7: because you know October surprise. If not, there's always the
Speaker 7: fifth of November to worry about, right anyway, remember remember
Speaker 7: fifth of November, That's what they murdered Bill Cooper. Hey,
Speaker 7: there we go, speaking of murderers.
Speaker 4: But I don't know.
Speaker 7: I wasn't there. I can't say that Bill Cooper was
Speaker 7: really murdered. I guess that's fair. So there you go.
Speaker 4: Well again, Adell, though again ruckus. I listened back to
Speaker 4: the episode from I think three weeks ago and or
Speaker 4: maybe it was two weeks ago, and yeah, and we
Speaker 4: brought up the Doyle Shamley interview who you know, and
Speaker 4: we played the clip about you know, those young podcasters
Speaker 4: kind of getting hip to Bill Cooper for the first time.
Speaker 4: And I dug that episode out of the Sunday Wire archives.
Speaker 4: It was way way way back in there. It was
Speaker 4: in twenty fifteen, and it wasn't up on Sunday on
Speaker 4: twenty first Century Wire dot coms page or Alternate Current
Speaker 4: Radio dot coms page, and I remastered it. I pulled
Speaker 4: all the old We used to use a queen song
Speaker 4: at the beginning of Sunday Wire, and we were threatened
Speaker 4: by our podcasting platforms that we can't have anything like
Speaker 4: that or we might lose our entire platform. So I
Speaker 4: deleted all the old episodes. In twenty twenty two, when
Speaker 4: that happened, and I pulled that one back out, so
Speaker 4: it is remastered, it's available, It's linked on last week
Speaker 4: or the week before show page. So if you want
Speaker 4: to learn more about the end of Bill Cooper's life,
Speaker 4: you can hear it from someone much more qualified to
Speaker 4: talk about it than either of us, even though both
Speaker 4: of us know the story very well and our big
Speaker 4: Bill Cooper fans we have, And that was, as far
Speaker 4: as I know, he told us, at least at the time,
Speaker 4: that that was the last time he was going to
Speaker 4: talk about that. So that was a landmark moment I
Speaker 4: felt in that show and in that moment in twenty fifteen,
Speaker 4: and we talked about it last week. It's now available
Speaker 4: at Alternate Current rated dot com in twenty first century
Speaker 4: wirre dot com. If you want to go back and
Speaker 4: hear about Bill Cooper's last days from one of his
Speaker 4: good friends and colleagues.
Speaker 7: There you go. But again, what really ultimately matters is
Speaker 7: what the outcome is, and they really do want to
Speaker 7: lead us into technocracy and all of the things, you know,
Speaker 7: I mean, isn't it interesting the timing here that just
Speaker 7: before all of this, that they were rolling out the
Speaker 7: National Guard on the streets. That's that's always fun.
Speaker 4: And they're still talk about that becoming the catalyst for
Speaker 4: a civil war, right, Like, what if Trump sends treats
Speaker 4: to Chicago.
Speaker 7: I think I think we're I think he is. I
Speaker 7: think they're going to be all over the place. I
Speaker 7: think that that will be a thing. I think that. Yeah,
Speaker 7: I don't know. Oh, man, I just I don't know.
Speaker 7: Maybe another virus. There's so many things. I don't think
Speaker 7: we're ready for the aliens, just quite yet. I think
Speaker 7: it's interesting the SEC, not the SEC, the Fed Reserve
Speaker 7: chair Palell shared your own Powell, they came out. He
Speaker 7: actually did cut some rates for the first time. And
Speaker 7: I think it's nine months. It's been a long time.
Speaker 7: It's what Trump wanted. He's been like, oh, you're too late. Powell,
Speaker 7: do the thing. This is the thing that everybody wanted
Speaker 7: him to do. Obviously, they would love for him to
Speaker 7: cut more. I think they will be cutting more. There'll
Speaker 7: be another one probably next month, and then another one
Speaker 7: either in November or December. But twenty five basis points
Speaker 7: or whatever. So the stock markets reacted quite positively. Cryptocurrency
Speaker 7: is reacting quite positively, and of course it's not going
Speaker 7: to do well for the average person who's not invested
Speaker 7: in those things. So congratulations to those of you who
Speaker 7: are goldess keeps sitting a new, brand new high like
Speaker 7: all the time. So congrats to all the gold people.
Speaker 7: And sad to be you if you're just holding on
Speaker 7: to those stanky old dollars, which will actually be incredibly
Speaker 7: useful to you one day when the world has gone
Speaker 7: cashless and you left your smartphone at home and you're
Speaker 7: in a tight spot doing at number two and you
Speaker 7: need some toilet paper, You got that Fiat money still
Speaker 7: with you and you can use it to wipe your.
Speaker 4: Ass or number three God forbid.
Speaker 7: Or the number three God forbid. They thanks for having me. Heesha.
Speaker 7: That's all I got, So thanks again, and God bless
Speaker 7: each and every one of you, and may God save
Speaker 7: this republic. Ruckus out all.
Speaker 4: Right, thanks ruckus, Thanks for being with us tonight, and
Speaker 4: thank you for being with us as well. I'm sorry
Speaker 4: I wasn't more active in the chats. Is do my
Speaker 4: best tonight, but a lot going on, so I'm way
Speaker 4: way back on my discord chat here, so sorry, Whitebird
Speaker 4: Kreee Awake, Jake Sage Fleety, all the other friends in
Speaker 4: Burnan Beard, all the other friends in the discord there
Speaker 4: as well as over at the Rumboldt, the X and
Speaker 4: the YouTube. Thanks for hanging with us tonight. We really
Speaker 4: appreciate it. And just you know, I don't know, it's
Speaker 4: so ridiculous right now. It's so ridiculous. Try to zoom
Speaker 4: out right now. I guess my only advice would be
Speaker 4: just to zoom out a little bit, take a step back,
Speaker 4: try to remove the emotional aspect, which is going to
Speaker 4: be the hardest ask for a lot of people right now.
Speaker 4: But I think it's going to get more intense as
Speaker 4: we move towards midterm elections, and again more intense as
Speaker 4: we move toward the next presidential elections, because if this
Speaker 4: country remains the way that it has been, we're off
Speaker 4: onto a new adventure. After Donald Trump completes his four years,
Speaker 4: What does that look like? Where are we at at
Speaker 4: that point? Where are we with the chaos in a
Speaker 4: post Charlie America? Isn't it amazing? Isn't it absolutely amazing
Speaker 4: that a political influencer could cause a show like The
Speaker 4: boiler Room to come up with a title like this,
Speaker 4: a post Charlie America. We aren't people that watched a
Speaker 4: lot of Charlie Kirk here in the boiler room. We aren't,
Speaker 4: you know. It's just like a lot of people didn't
Speaker 4: even know who this guy was until the other day,
Speaker 4: until a week ago. But it is what it is.
Speaker 4: They want to make a martyr out of him. Apparently
Speaker 4: they want to leave us with so many question marks
Speaker 4: about what we've seen in the last eight days that
Speaker 4: we give up or we commit. And that's the most
Speaker 4: dangerous one, I would say, committing to one of the
Speaker 4: narratives that we have right now. Who why would anyone
Speaker 4: commit to one of the narratives that we have? It
Speaker 4: doesn't even make sense. The timeline doesn't make sense, the
Speaker 4: W five doesn't make sense. The who, what, when, where, why?
Speaker 4: And if things were proper right, like if we were
Speaker 4: the country we thought we were, we could all just
Speaker 4: mourn this murder except that it happened, wait for the
Speaker 4: legal system to adjudicate everything, and then have open disclosure
Speaker 4: right once that's all done, about what happened, about the autopsy,
Speaker 4: about the bullet, about the evidence, about the known associates,
Speaker 4: all that you shouldn't have to worry about that right.
Speaker 4: You should not have to worry that because you have
Speaker 4: come to the conclusion that you've been lied to over
Speaker 4: and over and over again, oftentimes the motivation for those
Speaker 4: lies to start wars and mass violence on your tax dollars,
Speaker 4: by the way, that you don't believe this, and you
Speaker 4: shouldn't have to worry that you're going to lose friends
Speaker 4: over not believing it, or that you'll be called cold
Speaker 4: and callous for not believing it. And when I say it,
Speaker 4: I'm not trying to say Charlie Kirk is still alive.
Speaker 4: All I'm trying to say is you can't disparage people,
Speaker 4: and you can't cancel people, and you can't remove people's
Speaker 4: passports for asking the questions. Wait a minute, all these questions,
Speaker 4: what about this country? What about this person? What about
Speaker 4: that person? What about this scenario? What about the things
Speaker 4: that people that knew him are saying? What about the
Speaker 4: oddities coming from cash Pattel, from Governor Cox, from Donald Trump,
Speaker 4: from nettan Yahoo. None of these things should get you canceled.
Speaker 4: None of these things should get you uninvited from the
Speaker 4: Thanksgiving table. None of these things at this point in
Speaker 4: a post truth post Smith munt act era should hamper
Speaker 4: you at all. We still don't know what happened with JFK,
Speaker 4: although I will note there was a magic bullet involved there, right,
Speaker 4: the JFK magic bullet. It does U turns, it does
Speaker 4: crazy stuff. If Charlie Kirk's murder ends up like JFK
Speaker 4: and is never disclosed actually what happened, we could be
Speaker 4: thirty years from now talking about the magic bullet theory,
Speaker 4: the second shooter theory, the Trantifa theory, the Maga theory,
Speaker 4: the Israel theory, the CIA theory. Holy shit, you guys,
Speaker 4: Holy shit. I didn't even play the movie magic clips
Speaker 4: that go along with this. I'll link them on tonight's
Speaker 4: show page. If you're so blackpilled that you think maybe
Speaker 4: this guy's still alive and maybe this was fake in
Speaker 4: a setup, we got you. We'll give you a couple
Speaker 4: reference links. If you think that's bullshit, we got you.
Speaker 4: We'll give you a couple of reference links. If you
Speaker 4: are sure this had to do with Nettan, Yahoo and
Speaker 4: Israel and Charlie's refusal to play their tune, we got you.
Speaker 4: We're gonna put as many reference links as we can
Speaker 4: in the show page. Which will be available at Alternate
Speaker 4: Current Radio dot com. And I want you to decide
Speaker 4: for yourselves, but I caution you deciding based on what
Speaker 4: we have right now. And it's hard, it's really difficult.
Speaker 4: The zone has been flooded with identity politics. The zone
Speaker 4: has been flooded with conspiracy candy. The zone has been
Speaker 4: flooded with actual information. The zone has been flooded with
Speaker 4: the narratives of the mass media cartel, the FBI, the CIA.
Speaker 4: And then there's all the podcasters. I can't cast too
Speaker 4: much shade because here I am one of them, but
Speaker 4: I watch those that actually knew him, and I just think, Wow,
Speaker 4: what a shame it is that, if he really is dead,
Speaker 4: that he's not here to see this. This is absolutely
Speaker 4: jaw dropping to see. And ultimately, what I'm talking about
Speaker 4: seeing is the complete polarization, fracturization, and atomization of those
Speaker 4: that fought so hard to defeat the perceived perils of
Speaker 4: the left under Joe Biden, under the Covidian regime. That
Speaker 4: whole period of time, I interviewed people very close to
Speaker 4: Trump when I worked at TNT, Navarro, Manafort, Trump's PR woman,
Speaker 4: many others, and there was this confluence between twenty twenty
Speaker 4: two and twenty twenty four of voices from the independent
Speaker 4: alternative media and those from the GOP, the classic GOP.
Speaker 4: And I just feel like so many of those people
Speaker 4: that I talked to right now must just be going,
Speaker 4: what the fuck? What is going on here? How can
Speaker 4: this be? This was the dream team for me. Well,
Speaker 4: I hate to break it to you, but a lot
Speaker 4: of us felt like this might be the outcome. And
Speaker 4: if it wasn't for certain ally countries in the Middle East,
Speaker 4: a certain ally country in the Middle East and their agenda,
Speaker 4: as well as the international bankers and the technocrats, maybe
Speaker 4: this wouldn't be the situation. But those are the people
Speaker 4: that seem to be running the scripts. Those are the
Speaker 4: people that seem to be running the narratives. Those are
Speaker 4: the people that seem to be bringing and getting six
Speaker 4: hundred billion dollar deals in and out of this country.
Speaker 4: Those are the people that seem to be in charge
Speaker 4: of geopolitical policy, a lot of fiscal policy, and a
Speaker 4: lot of culture war bullshit. A lot of people thought
Speaker 4: this was going to be gone Whnald Trump won the
Speaker 4: second time. A lot of people thought this was going
Speaker 4: to be gone when Donald Trump won the first time. Right,
Speaker 4: we're referring to what he colloquially calls draining the swamp.
Speaker 4: The swamp persists, That's all I can say. The swamp
Speaker 4: is deeper than ever. Nothing makes sense. We're in the
Speaker 4: midst of yet another wonderland effect where you're so far
Speaker 4: down the rabbit hole you will accept anything to go
Speaker 4: back to normality. Eat me, drink me. If it takes
Speaker 4: me back to normal, I'll do it, because this is
Speaker 4: a wonderland of bullshit. All right, peace out, We'll see
Speaker 4: you next time. This has been the boiler room. Thanks
Speaker 4: for hanging with us, Stay chill, keep an open mind,
Speaker 4: stay metal. We'll see you next week.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 10: Go ahead and run, run home and cry to mama.