Speaker 1: Weird.
Speaker 2: We welcome back midnight viewers to Father them Alone's weekly
Speaker 2: round up slash Unintended Sophy Thatcher Film Festival. I'm Father
Speaker 2: Malone and with me playing the as yet unseen portion
Speaker 2: of Natalie's life between Juliet Lewis and Sophie Thatcher is
Speaker 2: miss Ripley. Gen it's a Yellowjacket's reference. Yeah, you didn't
Speaker 2: get through the pilot. You remember I said, did I
Speaker 2: program the music in this series like every five minutes?
Speaker 2: And then everyone was wearing horns and they were eating ears.
Speaker 2: You were most likely sleeping. Ripley enjoys sleeping, but we
Speaker 2: hope you're awake and alive in kicking and listening along.
Speaker 2: And as I sit in my Captain America themed office chair,
Speaker 2: wearing a Captain America themed thermal, looking down at my
Speaker 2: Captain America Tech two, I'd like to say to my
Speaker 2: fellow Americans, Nil's desperandum that's more than a quippie line
Speaker 2: from Gene Wilder's Willy Wonka. Isn't it a crime that
Speaker 2: we have to specify which Willy Wonka Nil's desperandum means
Speaker 2: never to spare Some see hope as dangerous. I think
Speaker 2: it's a defining trait of the nation, and neither should
Speaker 2: be a bandoned. I can't imagine if you hated that,
Speaker 2: you'd be inclined to subscribe for more of my nonsense.
Speaker 2: But now's the time on the show when I say
Speaker 2: head on over to patreon dot com slash fatherm alone.
Speaker 2: Subscribers get early access to all the shows and their
Speaker 2: commercial free, and we have a bonus subscriber show with
Speaker 2: a whole bunch of new, weirder ones on the way.
Speaker 2: It is always difficult for an actor to play the
Speaker 2: younger self of a well established star, but that factor
Speaker 2: of difficulty increases exponentially when we all knew that well
Speaker 2: established star at the age of the younger actor is
Speaker 2: portraying them. We all saw cape Fear, we all saw
Speaker 2: natural born killers. We've got an idea of what Juliette
Speaker 2: Lewis was like as a younger woman, and those two
Speaker 2: rules are a pretty good barometer of her range. So
Speaker 2: we not only know how she looked, but her capabilities,
Speaker 2: which have always been ferocious. Before we go down this
Speaker 2: route of an entire episode about the wonders of Sophie Thatcher,
Speaker 2: I want to say something about Juliette Lewis. I fucking
Speaker 2: adore her. I don't know her, never met her, don't
Speaker 2: know her personal convictions, but god damn it, I am
Speaker 2: happy she's breathing the same air I am. Not only
Speaker 2: does she have ferocity, but she has conviction. Most actors,
Speaker 2: when they get into music, they don't commit to it.
Speaker 2: Check out Juliet and the Licks. Sometime she decided she
Speaker 2: was not only going to be a musician, but she
Speaker 2: was going to be a fucking rock star. And she
Speaker 2: fucking did it. Knowing that. When it came time to
Speaker 2: cast the series Yellowjackets, it must have been daunting for
Speaker 2: the creators and potential actresses to fill Miss Lewis's younger shoes.
Speaker 2: But Sophie Thatcher nails it. And then, in a twist
Speaker 2: worthy of both of Tonight's selections, turns out they didn't
Speaker 2: cast it that way at all. Miss Thatcher was cast,
Speaker 2: and then they cast Juliet Lewis to match her intensity.
Speaker 2: It's a good call, a great call. The young Chicagoan
Speaker 2: is the contender for horror film greatness. Most actors pivot
Speaker 2: as far from the genre that made them famous as
Speaker 2: they can with their next choices, particularly if it's horror. Sure,
Speaker 2: Jamie Lee Curtis fully embraces her scream queen Moniker these days,
Speaker 2: but that's only with Halloween. You never hear her waxing
Speaker 2: nostalgic about Terror Train or prom Night, and you certainly
Speaker 2: didn't hear it in the years following her tenure in
Speaker 2: the Terror Ghetto. So to go from a horror series,
Speaker 2: fuck your thriller designations, your mystery box dramas. Yellow Jackets
Speaker 2: is about cannibals and something dark and primordial. Even if
Speaker 2: it is a deconstruction of teenage hierarchy and it's greater
Speaker 2: reflection of societal organization, it's a horror show. For her
Speaker 2: to step out of a horror series and then into
Speaker 2: not one, but two horror projects is wildly refreshing. In
Speaker 2: these two movies were big fucking surprises for me, owing
Speaker 2: slightly to the fact that I made a conscious decision
Speaker 2: a few months ago to avoid any and all info
Speaker 2: about either film, which I was successful, But I wasn't
Speaker 2: necessarily avoiding the usual studio promotional material. It was the
Speaker 2: online community I was keeping my head down around when
Speaker 2: all these movie websites pop up in the early odds.
Speaker 2: It seemed pretty cool that movie fanatics suddenly had a
Speaker 2: forum to be as weird about film as they liked.
Speaker 2: But that devolved pretty quickly like every corner of the Internet.
Speaker 2: And I don't mean in snarky, derisive bullshit either. I mean,
Speaker 2: in this case, the very odd phenomenon of anti gatekeeping.
Speaker 2: It used to be there was always a group of
Speaker 2: superfan assholes deflecting any new interest into their secret handshake
Speaker 2: tree house. That was annoying. Way more annoying to me
Speaker 2: are these anti gatekeepers announcing months in advance that you
Speaker 2: definitely have to see this movie that they're talking about
Speaker 2: because it is the best horror film ever made. But
Speaker 2: you'll have to take my word for it because I
Speaker 2: saw it at the Spooky Showcase in Sheboygan. And the
Speaker 2: film doesn't get a wide release for another nine months,
Speaker 2: and then it'll only be in New York and Helsinki.
Speaker 2: I know I touched on this when we talked about
Speaker 2: Robert Eggers, but I'd rather have every twist in a
Speaker 2: movie spoiled for me than have someone over hype it.
Speaker 2: Superlatives should be stricken from every keyboard critics vocabulary. That's
Speaker 2: why I've been a fan of the Weekly Planet podcast
Speaker 2: for more than a decade. Those Australians were way ahead
Speaker 2: of everyone when they developed their movie rating system. Everything
Speaker 2: reviewed is either the best movie ever or the worst
Speaker 2: movie ever, which is pretty clever and pretty goddamn true.
Speaker 2: Is there no middle ground anymore? Does everything have to
Speaker 2: be a religious experience or a total piece of shit?
Speaker 2: Absolutism working great in every aspect of American society these days,
Speaker 2: Which leads us to Companion. Well, wait, before that, I know,
Speaker 2: I promise I'll get to the film proper. And this
Speaker 2: does tie in because Companion is about a sentient android,
Speaker 2: and it automatically conjures up the android film, Ridley Scott's
Speaker 2: nineteen eighty two neo noir masterpiece Blade Runner. Fuck it,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna digress even further. Art is subjective, But if
Speaker 2: you think Blade Runner twenty forty nine is the superior
Speaker 2: of those two films, I'd like to invite you to
Speaker 2: have sex with yourself anyway. Blade Runner is filled, overstuffed
Speaker 2: really with not only beautiful imagery and interesting characters, but
Speaker 2: interesting concepts. And I always came away with a deep
Speaker 2: sense of melancholy from that film. It is, after all,
Speaker 2: about mortality in facing it, that's what the replicants are doing.
Speaker 2: They've returned to Earth to extend their criminally short life span.
Speaker 2: So when Roy Mattie laments that every moment of his
Speaker 2: life is lost like tears in the rain, we can
Speaker 2: all relate to that and quoted and mythologize it. But
Speaker 2: for me, the tragedy of Blade Runner takes place two
Speaker 2: or three reels before that. As heartbreaking as it is
Speaker 2: to face his own obsolescence, at least Roy Manny knew
Speaker 2: what he was, and the memories he's lamenting losing are
Speaker 2: his own. Not so for Rachel. She is not only
Speaker 2: unaware that she's artificial, but none of her memories are hers.
Speaker 2: How would you react to that? Not only is your
Speaker 2: life alive, but your every memory of it was too.
Speaker 2: Rachel chooses to start a new life of her own.
Speaker 2: I no doubt would have walked into the ocean hoping
Speaker 2: it would short circuit me. Companion gives us a third
Speaker 2: and way more realistic possibility.
Speaker 3: There from two moments in my life when I was happiest.
Speaker 3: The first was the day I met Josh. I'm Josh,
Speaker 3: i'm Arius, and the second the day I killed him.
Speaker 2: Just relax, remember to smile and act happy.
Speaker 4: Did they know?
Speaker 2: Iris?
Speaker 5: Wake up?
Speaker 6: What are you doing?
Speaker 7: Shut her down already?
Speaker 8: What is she talking about, Joshua, Josha, this was not
Speaker 8: part of the plant.
Speaker 5: I didn't mean to.
Speaker 6: Did you jail break your sex book?
Speaker 3: Wow? Josh the days of you controlling me? Borrow first?
Speaker 2: Are you breaking up with me?
Speaker 6: It's not you, it's me. Yeah.
Speaker 7: She's tied up inside, so she's not going anywhere.
Speaker 3: M hmm.
Speaker 8: Eliris is spitting on a value.
Speaker 2: Thatcher plays Iris. She and her boyfriend Josh, played by
Speaker 2: the Boys and the Lower Deck star Jack Quaid. Did
Speaker 2: you know he was Dennis Quaid's son, Yeah, look at him.
Speaker 2: Josh and Iris are spending the weekend at an incredibly
Speaker 2: secluded and incredibly lavish house in the wilds of I
Speaker 2: don't know, but it's heavily forested. Boy Sophie Thatcher cannot
Speaker 2: get out of the woods. There there with two other couples,
Speaker 2: Kat and Serge is the shady Russian millionaire that owns
Speaker 2: said secluded house, and Patrick and the Eli Eli played
Speaker 2: by What we do in the Shadows stand Out and
Speaker 2: a human I find just as inspiring as Juliet Lewis
Speaker 2: Harvey Gillen. When he was twelve, he collected cans for
Speaker 2: months to pay for improv classes for himself. Conviction is
Speaker 2: a theme on tonight's episode Thatcher's iris is unlike any
Speaker 2: character I've seen her play, impervious to the barbed insults
Speaker 2: of Josh's friends while remaining curious and innocent. There's really
Speaker 2: no other word for it. That's even after she fends
Speaker 2: off the unwonted advances of Sergey with an obscene amount
Speaker 2: of bloodshed. Now here's where this review gets tricky. I
Speaker 2: went in blind, so I want the same for you.
Speaker 2: I'll do my best because the movie has multiple twists,
Speaker 2: and for the most part, they are unexpected and a
Speaker 2: lot of fun. There are recent sci fi comparisons to
Speaker 2: be made, Megan being the obvious one, an unhinged robot
Speaker 2: surrogate for a best friend. Far less successful than that
Speaker 2: was Don't Worry Darling. That was the virtual reality clap trap,
Speaker 2: where all men wanted to do was enslave women into
Speaker 2: thinking their housewife so that they can go to work. Okay.
Speaker 2: In the last episode, I talked about director Lee one
Speaker 2: El's film Invisible Man, gaining an immense amount of push
Speaker 2: toward relevancy thanks to its cresting the wave of the
Speaker 2: Me Too movement. And I still think that's true. But
Speaker 2: as I stated, that movie didn't need the haft of
Speaker 2: any swirling zeitgeist. You wouldn't have believed the technology in
Speaker 2: the nineteen seventies. But that story could have been folded
Speaker 2: just as easily then or the nineteen eighties, et cetera.
Speaker 2: Not so with the whole spate of movies that have
Speaker 2: come out in the past few years, i e. After
Speaker 2: that wave has broken and withdrawn way the fuck back out.
Speaker 2: Now we're at low tide, and films that had no
Speaker 2: chance of getting made because they're terrible have a new relevancy.
Speaker 2: Like Perfection, which amusingly enough stars Megan's Alison Williams, another
Speaker 2: actor out there slugging it out in the horror movie Trenches.
Speaker 2: The Perfection is so achingly constructed to be meaningful with
Speaker 2: a capital A twenty four, but appropriately was released by
Speaker 2: Miramax promising Young Woman is a defanged remake of Miss
Speaker 2: forty five. Film was unafraid to be as rage filmed
Speaker 2: as the subject matter required. I'm not necessarily lumping Companion
Speaker 2: in with those although there is some clumsy, fucking stumbling
Speaker 2: subtextence text near the finale of this film that all
Speaker 2: but screams head meet nail. But unlike those films, this
Speaker 2: one isn't fucking ponderous or means spirited, because if you're
Speaker 2: gonna go dark, go all the fucking way. I'm not
Speaker 2: the biggest fan of the Substance, but I admire every
Speaker 2: impulse it had and acts upon. Like Invisible Man or
Speaker 2: The Substance or The Fly, this movie could have easily
Speaker 2: existed in any previous decade, because while it is about
Speaker 2: the power dynamics in a relationship for good or ill,
Speaker 2: and not just between Iris and Josh, the film is
Speaker 2: still wrestling with notions of identity and sentience and moreover love.
Speaker 2: The film begins tellingly with Iris and Josh meeting in
Speaker 2: a romantic scenario that can't possibly be real, and it wasn't,
Speaker 2: but it is to Iris. What follows before the batshit
Speaker 2: craziness begins, Finds Hurt, genuinely trying to understand how others
Speaker 2: conceive of and feel love. It might just be a
Speaker 2: subroutine running in or programming, but it proves to be
Speaker 2: as seemingly powerful in the digital world as it does
Speaker 2: in the real one. It's not all great these science
Speaker 2: is a bit wonky. Here a society where there are
Speaker 2: robot companions unaware their robot companions when they'd have to
Speaker 2: live in a world where such an item is advertised
Speaker 2: and potentially commonplace, is a bit silly. But for every
Speaker 2: one of those there's an equally ingenious use of technology.
Speaker 2: I mentioned at the top how absolute everything has to
Speaker 2: be these days. Well, this movie it's fine. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's good. You know. Is it the best sci fi
Speaker 2: horror thing I've seen recently? No, but neither was it
Speaker 2: Follows or Nosferatu or Barbarian. Wait you love Barbarian? Well,
Speaker 2: I thought it was pretty good. Was it the most
Speaker 2: horrifying thing ever? No, that movie had huge problems. I
Speaker 2: wouldn't think someone would come along so quickly on its
Speaker 2: heels and deliver a superior version. And yet that's exactly
Speaker 2: what the film Ripley has chosen. This week hit at
Speaker 2: hp J film, Thank you hp There'll be no great
Speaker 2: moments in presidential speeches this week. I was thinking a
Speaker 2: lot about Barbarian when I was watching Rip's pick. But
Speaker 2: I was really thinking a lot about torture porn. Barbarian
Speaker 2: never fell into that category. It is its own level
Speaker 2: of weird. But in the wake of Saw, we had
Speaker 2: a veritable glut of filmmakers devising more and more intricate
Speaker 2: and horrible ways to separate flesh from bone, most times
Speaker 2: at the character's own hands, while we, as the audience,
Speaker 2: were all made Alexander Delares like clockwork orange and forced
Speaker 2: to stare helplessly. I was never a fan of the genre.
Speaker 2: It felt like all the caterwauling by parents and religious
Speaker 2: groups during the nineteen eighties preaching that slasher films were
Speaker 2: desensitizing the generation to violence was manifested in torture porn, unlikable,
Speaker 2: uninteresting characters being dispatched in truly ingenious and truly horrifying methods.
Speaker 2: If those films are your thing, bully hell I worked
Speaker 2: as an actor at the Escape Room for a piece,
Speaker 2: but they ultimately felt like a victory for those finger
Speaker 2: wagging scolds. This film has all the trappings of any
Speaker 2: of those films lead characters trapped in a puzzle and
Speaker 2: forced to confront uncomfortable situations, only they managed to do
Speaker 2: it here without the torture or the porn. This is
Speaker 2: from last year. It's heretic.
Speaker 1: Hi, good afternoon, ma'am.
Speaker 7: Are you interested in learning about our savior Jesus Price?
Speaker 4: Hi afternoon?
Speaker 7: Are you your name of Sister Barnes?
Speaker 8: And?
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, are you interested in learning more about
Speaker 2: the Church of Jesus Christ?
Speaker 1: Come on it.
Speaker 7: We can't come inside and lets another woman is present.
Speaker 4: My wife is home. Does that come crazy?
Speaker 8: You like pie?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I could tell that you are a very spiritually curious person.
Speaker 1: I think it is good to be religious, to find
Speaker 1: your faith in a doctrine you actually believe. Here is done.
Speaker 8: I will go and check on the path self.
Speaker 6: Estee sile.
Speaker 8: Mh you can do this. You're crazy. We just need
Speaker 8: to go home. I won't keep you if you wish
Speaker 8: to leave, but I want you to choose which daughter
Speaker 8: go through based on your faith. What does this have
Speaker 8: to do with us leaving everything were being studied. It
Speaker 8: will make your puss will be faster, It may even
Speaker 8: make you want to die.
Speaker 1: Do not be afraid.
Speaker 8: You will witness a miracle.
Speaker 2: I don't know about you, but when Hugh Grant hit
Speaker 2: the scene, I thought it was hilarious that he was
Speaker 2: being taken as a romantic lead. This was the guy
Speaker 2: from Layer of the White Worms. How can anyone look
Speaker 2: at him and think anything other than cantankerous old prick
Speaker 2: is beyond me? Even at college age, Hugh Grant fairly
Speaker 2: screamed cantankerous old prick. I didn't have anything against his
Speaker 2: tenure in the land of romantic comedies, nor did I
Speaker 2: give a shit when he was arrested and forced to
Speaker 2: walk like Circe Lanister through the airwaves while Jay Leno
Speaker 2: chanted shame at him. I was just waiting for him
Speaker 2: to come into his own and boy, howdy, he sure has.
Speaker 1: Lately.
Speaker 2: There have been nothing but horror stories from everyone he's
Speaker 2: worked with, and he's now finally leaned into the roles
Speaker 2: he was born to play, embracing his cantankerous pricketude. It's
Speaker 2: certainly on display here. But there is another facet of
Speaker 2: Hugh Grant, and this is why he was so desirable
Speaker 2: in those romantic leading roles. He seems whip smart. The
Speaker 2: smugness isn't there by accident. He seems a muscular performer who,
Speaker 2: given the right role, will absolutely embody it. His character
Speaker 2: here is as solid as any of the thriller villains
Speaker 2: we've come to love over the years, his closest parallel
Speaker 2: being less Jigsaw and more lecter, making this a thriller. Listen,
Speaker 2: I am not the biggest thriller fan. My idea of
Speaker 2: entertainment on the whole does not involve watching characters. I
Speaker 2: genuinely like being forced into smaller and smaller boxes with
Speaker 2: greater and more disturbing consequences. It's not a great feeling.
Speaker 2: They make me understand those who ask how I can
Speaker 2: watch gory films with such glee. It makes me understand
Speaker 2: their confusion about it anyway. But I do admire a
Speaker 2: well made thriller, even if it's putting me through the
Speaker 2: paces and in some scenes genuinely making my heart beat faster.
Speaker 2: This film did it a few times. Even Ripley noticed,
Speaker 2: Yes you did. It was the only time you jumped
Speaker 2: during this movie. That and during the Blueberry Pie. So
Speaker 2: here's the setup. Two Mormon missionaries try to proselytize to
Speaker 2: the wrong house that secluded one sent far back from
Speaker 2: the street. The house owner is grant. Those missionaries are
Speaker 2: Sophie Thatcher, fucking solid as always, with a character as
Speaker 2: different from Iris as Iris was from Natalie on Yellowjackets.
Speaker 2: But the real standout here, which is no small feed
Speaker 2: given this film as a three hander, with two of
Speaker 2: those hands belonging to Grant and thatcher. Fuck that sounds
Speaker 2: incredibly British, is an actress named Chloe East. She was
Speaker 2: last seen in The Fableman's Not that any of you
Speaker 2: saw that film, and a film that I personally think
Speaker 2: the final scene should have been the first. Anyway. She
Speaker 2: played the young Sammy Fableman's goy love interest Monica. In
Speaker 2: that she was good there, She's fucking a riotous here,
Speaker 2: playing the genuinely pious of the two missionaries who must
Speaker 2: find strengths of reserve and faith she was unaware she had,
Speaker 2: and faith is important in this film because the homeowner,
Speaker 2: mister Reid, isn't your typical psychopath. Oh sure, he's interested
Speaker 2: in teaching some lessons, but not necessarily the ones that
Speaker 2: involve your skin being flayed off by a repurposed washing
Speaker 2: machine or whatever. The fuck. Oh no, because while he's
Speaker 2: lured these young women to his house with a request
Speaker 2: for education on the Church of Latter day Saints, the
Speaker 2: fact is mister Reid knows far more about the book
Speaker 2: of Mormon and its history than either missionary are in
Speaker 2: any way prepared for a theological cat and mouse flick.
Speaker 2: And it works. You're fucking right, it does. What's more,
Speaker 2: the film, in addition to providing the usual ratcheting of
Speaker 2: tension you'd expect from any thriller, manages another nifty trick
Speaker 2: by constantly making you side with Hugh Grant. The fact
Speaker 2: is you never know his intention, and it plays with that,
Speaker 2: forcing you again and again back between the character's points
Speaker 2: of view, all the while delivering a treatise on not
Speaker 2: just Mormonism, but all religions and how they interconnect and
Speaker 2: how they fundamentally share certain undeniable traits, while forcing our
Speaker 2: leads to make choices based on their continued fealty to
Speaker 2: their faith or their new points of view. Thanks to
Speaker 2: Reed's diatribes, this is the role for Hugh Grant, as
Speaker 2: far as I'm concerned, I've honestly never seen him better.
Speaker 2: He just disappears into this guy and in a way
Speaker 2: reinforces everything the movie is trying to say about perception
Speaker 2: and reality. Oh, speaking of disappearing to for Grace is
Speaker 2: in this too. The only non problematic that seventies show
Speaker 2: actor and editing Jedi Toafer Grace plays the only other
Speaker 2: major role, and he's in it a lot, and I
Speaker 2: had no fucking idea who he was until the end credits.
Speaker 1: Bravo.
Speaker 2: I loved this movie. I don't know what else to say.
Speaker 2: I mean, I do, but spoilers being spoilers, don't want
Speaker 2: to spoil anything because I've probably already said too much,
Speaker 2: except I will say this. I mentioned hope at the
Speaker 2: beginning of this show, and it's necessity and maybe even
Speaker 2: the fucking point of life. I am a half century
Speaker 2: old at this point, and I feel it man physically, emotionally, culturally,
Speaker 2: and it's easy in one's life at a certain point
Speaker 2: to say that's it. I'm good. I've got all the
Speaker 2: music and literature and movies and all the things that
Speaker 2: make life worth living. I've had my fill. I can't
Speaker 2: really see anything new coming up as anything but a disappointment.
Speaker 2: These are the people that somehow canonized Doc Brown and
Speaker 2: Marty McFly, and they won't accept a Ghostbuster with a vagina.
Speaker 2: It's so fucking lazy and self centered to think that
Speaker 2: the pinnacle of culture happened around your adolescence, and it's
Speaker 2: goddamn boring to think that there isn't going to be
Speaker 2: anything after you of quality. So when I see young
Speaker 2: performers like Sophie Thatcher or Chloe East or Harvey Gillen
Speaker 2: or Anya Taylor Joy or Jack Quaid or even fucking Shallome,
Speaker 2: they give me hope. There's always going to be interesting people,
Speaker 2: and on occasion they might have something interesting to say,
Speaker 2: or at least know a new way to ask an
Speaker 2: old question. I don't know a new way to ask.
Speaker 2: If I did, I wouldn't be this fucking old. You
Speaker 2: ask a question in a new way that's not new,
Speaker 2: and it's perverted, and I've been asked that before. Thank
Speaker 2: you one and all for lending us your ears well
Speaker 2: once again here at Midnight Viewing's Father Malone's weekly roundup.
Speaker 2: Be sure to tune in this coming Friday, we're continuing
Speaker 2: to wade through Tales from the Dark Side season three
Speaker 2: with two new episodes, The Bitterest Pill and Florence Bravo.
Speaker 2: I already called you all the actions, so I guess
Speaker 2: we're just going to sign off and enjoy the rest
Speaker 2: of our Sunday. We record on Sundays, and given that
Speaker 2: it is the Lord's Day. We're gonna leave you with
Speaker 2: a bit from mister Reed.
Speaker 1: Judaism i e.
Speaker 7: The original edition, Christianity i e. The most popular edition,
Speaker 7: and Islam the newer second most popular edition.
Speaker 8: And finally, after eight hundred years.
Speaker 3: This.
Speaker 7: Mormonism i e.
Speaker 8: The z Any regional spinoff edition. These are all iterations
Speaker 8: of the same source material.
Speaker 6: These sects share many of the same characters and histories, or.
Speaker 8: Be it presented with different meanings and perspectives.
Speaker 1: So no, I will not accept unless you stand there
Speaker 1: and tell me that you never heard there that I
Speaker 1: breathed by the Hollies, when I know that you have
Speaker 1: heard Creep by Radiohead.
Speaker 5: Oh yes, you have come on, heard him a creep?
Speaker 5: H I'm a weirder. Okay, what the hell am I
Speaker 5: doing here? I remember these are things you're thinking right now?
Speaker 5: But that also lyrics you recognize.
Speaker 6: Yes, yes, the Hollies filed a plagiarism lawsuit against Radiohead,
Speaker 6: which they later settled by proving that the melody and
Speaker 6: rhythm of the air that I breathe appearing Creep Howard.
Speaker 8: Nineteen or twenty something like that.
Speaker 4: Okay, so maybe you know Lana del Ray who remarkably
Speaker 4: was sued by Radiohead for plagiarizing Creep in her twenty
Speaker 4: seventeen song get Free, Iterations.
Speaker 8: Over Time, diluting a message obscuring the original need.
Speaker 3: Shot Show from Sheep Show Shop Show