Speaker 1: This is where I think the faux alien threat comes
Speaker 1: into play. And we don't know how they're going to
Speaker 1: use this, but they keep talking about it. It keeps popping up.
Speaker 1: You go back to the nineteen forties and fifties. The
Speaker 1: whole emergence of the alien UFO threat comes through science
Speaker 1: fiction writing. It comes through HG. Wells, It comes through
Speaker 1: these books that the original crazy people who supposedly were abducted,
Speaker 1: Betty and Barney Hill, Georgia Damski, their stories are made up.
Speaker 1: In fact, it was exposed that their stories actually come
Speaker 1: from science fiction novels at the time. Go watch the
Speaker 1: documentary Mirage Men and explains how a lot of the
Speaker 1: counterintelligence that basically the alien nonsense is part of counterintelligence.
Speaker 1: They even interview the people who are involved in the
Speaker 1: counter intelligence operations to give people feed people nonsense and
Speaker 1: disinformation relating to aliens.
Speaker 2: Twenty twenty one has been an incredible year. It's been
Speaker 2: an incredible year for evil, but it's also been an
Speaker 2: amazing year for the global awakening, and it's hard to
Speaker 2: believe it's almost over. Christmas twenty twenty one is now
Speaker 2: a thing of history, and we are plunging into the
Speaker 2: most critical year not just in US history, but world
Speaker 2: history in my view, So please continue to spread the
Speaker 2: word about mfull Wars. Please continue to pray for the
Speaker 2: broadcast because all of us together, including you the viewers
Speaker 2: and listeners, are the tip of the spear. And take
Speaker 2: advantage of Christmas sales that will end Thursday morning. I'm
Speaker 2: cutting this on Tuesday morning. This is only going to
Speaker 2: run until Thursday morning, and the sale will end up
Speaker 2: to sixty percent off, double Patriot points and free shipping
Speaker 2: at mfull warstore dot com. So thanks for keeping us
Speaker 2: on the air while getting great products at the same
Speaker 2: time like Vitamenteral Fusion, DNA Force Plus, Ultimate Bone Broth Formula,
Speaker 2: Ultimate Tumoric Formula, and so much more at mfullwarstore dot com.
Speaker 2: The sale ends in just two days.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Aux John John your guest host
Speaker 1: a Diary of Jason Alisons. Today, I'm going to be
Speaker 1: talking about some information that will help us understand how
Speaker 1: it is that we got to where we are. It's
Speaker 1: always important to look at the news, and in today's news,
Speaker 1: we have reports of NASA hiring multiple dozens of theologians
Speaker 1: and writers in different religious traditions to discuss what would
Speaker 1: be the reaction on the part of the population when
Speaker 1: they talk about the next big discovery or alien life. Now,
Speaker 1: NASA has put out these kinds of reports and these
Speaker 1: kinds of claims for decades. In fact, it goes all
Speaker 1: the way back into the nineteen sixties when there was
Speaker 1: a Brookings Report Institute done for NASA, and if you
Speaker 1: don't know, Brookings' is one of the top think tanks
Speaker 1: out there. They helped to craft policy, they helped to
Speaker 1: come up with geopolitical strategies, techniques as long as as
Speaker 1: well as rank corporation, which we're going to get to
Speaker 1: here in a moment, But they talked about the effect
Speaker 1: that it would have on the public when they announced
Speaker 1: that there's alien extra biological life. And I believe, as
Speaker 1: you know, I've covered this many times. They've done multiple
Speaker 1: segments here in the fourth Hour on how I think
Speaker 1: this is a big scaled deception. And one of the
Speaker 1: reasons I think that is that if you go back
Speaker 1: to that nineteen six I think sixty eight Brookings Report
Speaker 1: Institute discussion of the topic of alien life, they point
Speaker 1: out they admit that the Christian religion quote would be
Speaker 1: particularly compromised by the discovery of alien life, since it
Speaker 1: makes such a deal of the incarnation of Christ and
Speaker 1: history and the historical event and the knowledge of Christ's passion,
Speaker 1: ascension and atonement would then be brought into question. This
Speaker 1: would be irreconcilable with the doctrine of alien life. And
Speaker 1: funny because I covered that in my book multiple years
Speaker 1: ago back on Esoterically Wood two the sequel, and so
Speaker 1: I was talking about, how, you know, Hollywood, the alien
Speaker 1: movies have been talking about this for so long and
Speaker 1: they're really just prepping us for this. And even to
Speaker 1: my surprise when that World Economic Forum video came out
Speaker 1: four years ago, five years ago, when it was the
Speaker 1: you know, ten things to expect in the next ten
Speaker 1: years or eight things, whatever it was, and they talked
Speaker 1: about alien life being one of the things that Klaus
Speaker 1: and his crew said would be to come, said to
Speaker 1: expect within the time period of twenty twenty to twenty thirty,
Speaker 1: alien life, the announcement of alien life. And we've also
Speaker 1: seen Klaus in different talks talking about synthetic biology, We're
Speaker 1: going to change you, We're going to be in your body.
Speaker 1: And my suspicion this is my analysis, my theory, so
Speaker 1: that they will try to tie this into a new
Speaker 1: origin of myths or a new myth of origins, a
Speaker 1: new life science origins relating to alien life. And if
Speaker 1: you read that article there on Western Journal about this
Speaker 1: whole announcement from now so they even go into talking
Speaker 1: about people from Oxford, people from Cambridge, people from different
Speaker 1: religious traditions, talking about how, oh, maybe it's really what
Speaker 1: the Jesuit lucifair in Tayhart the shard inset a kind
Speaker 1: of convergence of all the world religions and of all
Speaker 1: science and religion into one new thing. And Christianity really
Speaker 1: would have to kind of compromise and fit into this
Speaker 1: new scenario. That's what the Workers Important Institute said back
Speaker 1: in the sixties. So what's in the news today, It
Speaker 1: was actually in the thing, thanks what fifty sixty years ago? Now?
Speaker 1: Why is that? Why do we have these ideas that
Speaker 1: are seeded fifty sixty years ago? See it oftentimes through fiction,
Speaker 1: through movies especially, and it's propaganda. It's what I've covered
Speaker 1: in my books is what I cover a lot in
Speaker 1: terms of culture creation, culture creation? Where does this come from?
Speaker 1: Why do we have the idea of culture creation. Well,
Speaker 1: it's the old ancient world's idea of mythology. Right. We
Speaker 1: have the notion of myths that the poet, that, the bard,
Speaker 1: that the philosopher, the homer, the storyteller. Right, Even Plato
Speaker 1: told these kinds of myths that we're intended to teach
Speaker 1: the society and train the society to go in a
Speaker 1: certain direction. Sometimes the myths were true in terms of
Speaker 1: the principles behind them, the archetypes in a Carl Jung
Speaker 1: type of sense. Sometimes the myths are completely fabricated, and
Speaker 1: they're intended to deceive and vague and obfuscate right the
Speaker 1: population and get them to believe the myth of the state,
Speaker 1: to worship the state as God, etc. So the state
Speaker 1: has always seen a necessity to having a noble a myth.
Speaker 1: In today's world, even though we think of it as
Speaker 1: highly scientific, highly pragmatic, highly technical, is just as if
Speaker 1: not more so, engineered via mythology, via technocratic inducement to
Speaker 1: belief or religious engineering on the part of social engineers
Speaker 1: and psychological warfare experts. We've been covering this for a
Speaker 1: long time. I've covered this in this just as last
Speaker 1: week I did a whole two hour lecture on the
Speaker 1: totality of mk Ultra from all the research and the
Speaker 1: new stuff that I've been covered in the last six
Speaker 1: months relating to just how much continues to come out
Speaker 1: about those projects. Now, when we get to excuse me,
Speaker 1: the Rand Corporation, this is of course the brainschild of
Speaker 1: the Air Force. This comes out of people like Curtis
Speaker 1: LeMay and the idea of creating a giant think tank
Speaker 1: that could really wargame the new world that we're going into.
Speaker 1: Since we're going into a technocratic future world, they just
Speaker 1: sort of decree we're going to need thinkers, We're gonna
Speaker 1: need mathematicians and quants they were called. That is, technocratic
Speaker 1: math mathematics obsessed spergs basically leading us into this new
Speaker 1: world order. And how could they engineer not just America,
Speaker 1: the whole world into this new order. And this is
Speaker 1: where the social engineering comes into play with changing the
Speaker 1: American landscape. There's a great book. Alex extually did a
Speaker 1: documentary many many years ago interviewing the author of Soldiers
Speaker 1: of Reason, alex Abea in his classic treatment. Now, this
Speaker 1: is kind of an establishment, okay treatment, It's kind of
Speaker 1: like we're going to allow this guy in. We're gonna
Speaker 1: let him publish the first sort of public analysis and
Speaker 1: records analysis of the Rank corporation from the vantage point
Speaker 1: of a journalist. So even this sort of whitewashed report
Speaker 1: is amazing in what it admits, right because as we
Speaker 1: as we've seen over and over and over in my
Speaker 1: Global Elites lecture series, when we read the books of
Speaker 1: these guys, especially in the last one hundred years, they
Speaker 1: really tell us everything. They don't hold anything back. It's
Speaker 1: all put out out there, and you know, just on
Speaker 1: the on the table they lay down all their cards.
Speaker 1: And I believe that they do that precisely because it's
Speaker 1: a kind of a strategy. You could liken it to
Speaker 1: gas lighting, but you could you could just say that
Speaker 1: it's hidden in plain sight to really just condition people
Speaker 1: and get them, get them used to it. So the
Speaker 1: Air Force set this up as a kind of post
Speaker 1: World War Two era Cold War think tank, and the
Speaker 1: Cold War, as I more and more come to discovering, research,
Speaker 1: was really I managed elected. I don't believe everybody in
Speaker 1: the Cold War was a bad guy. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: everybody on the on the you know, espionage level of
Speaker 1: the Cold War was a bad person or participating in
Speaker 1: a knowingly in a lie. A lot of people were
Speaker 1: going along with things that they didn't see the full
Speaker 1: you know, fifty year projections plans at that time, so
Speaker 1: they didn't know any better. I had family members who,
Speaker 1: you know, were Cold War people, and they thought they
Speaker 1: were really fighting the evil Soviet Empire and the Soviets
Speaker 1: were an evil atheist empire. But what has come out
Speaker 1: in recent decades is that there was a lot of
Speaker 1: exaggeration of the threats from these foreign right enemies, these
Speaker 1: foreign powers, these foreign power blocks, and that was intentionally
Speaker 1: hyped up by the CIA, by the OSS to bring
Speaker 1: us into a Cold war, and so the Marshall Plan
Speaker 1: and that kind of stuff. This sort of kicks off
Speaker 1: the era of the Cold War, which a lot of
Speaker 1: analystsa is World War three. And you're going to see
Speaker 1: why the war so important, because this is where the
Speaker 1: Rand Corporation really steps into the four to change the
Speaker 1: American landscape into something different, and really you could say
Speaker 1: that mutually sure destruction. The whole idea of the Cold
Speaker 1: War comes out of the Rand Corporation's strategies, and it's
Speaker 1: not for just winning a battle. It's not for us
Speaker 1: being the good guys versus the bad guys. It's a
Speaker 1: long term strategy to bring in well first of all,
Speaker 1: to change the idea of what America is out of
Speaker 1: a protectionist, isolationist country that is a production based economy, literally,
Speaker 1: to turn it into the policeman of the world and
Speaker 1: into a consumer economy. So we had to undergo decades
Speaker 1: of bombardment of guess what fear And this is really
Speaker 1: what Kubrick is lampooning in something like Doctor Strangelok. It's
Speaker 1: a great example a satirical approach to how the Cold
Speaker 1: War took us into the technocracy. That's where we are now.
Speaker 1: We are in the era of long term, decades, century
Speaker 1: long planning to get us into this technocratic world order.
Speaker 1: They couldn't have happened if we had not had this
Speaker 1: managed dialectical conflict of thesis antithesis synthesis of two materialistic
Speaker 1: atheistic power structures and philosophies that is, rand and Randian
Speaker 1: style capitalism monopoly capitalism versus Soviet style communism, and the
Speaker 1: smashing of these two together is a kind of nuclear
Speaker 1: explosion leading us into the synthesis. In the Hegelian philosophy
Speaker 1: of dialectics, which is the new third option, which is
Speaker 1: you could say it is the technocratic synthesis of these
Speaker 1: two things. Welcome back to the Aux Jones Show. I'm
Speaker 1: your guest host Jay DIYer of Jason Nealysis. Be sure
Speaker 1: and support the tip of the spear in the Info
Speaker 1: War by going to the Info War Store and getting
Speaker 1: all the supplements that you need as well as the
Speaker 1: other DVDs and other materials there that really help fight
Speaker 1: against the tyranny that is just exploding. But there's also
Speaker 1: a mass awakening, so there's a lot of positive things
Speaker 1: that are happening. Now. We were talking about the history
Speaker 1: of the Rain Corporation and I was getting to the
Speaker 1: fact that really the whole Cold War was dreamt up,
Speaker 1: really engineered by the so called neocons as they were,
Speaker 1: well they're neocons, but they're not really conservatives at the
Speaker 1: Rain Corporation. And the reason I'm going after the neocons
Speaker 1: here is not because I think that they're you know,
Speaker 1: necessarily running everything, although they kind of did eventually get
Speaker 1: the upper hand and kind of went out. We saw
Speaker 1: for example, Obama and people like this really just eventually
Speaker 1: going into the neocon camp. A lot of people talked
Speaker 1: about Hillary basically being a neoconservative, and the reason for
Speaker 1: that is that the original neoconservatives at the time of
Speaker 1: Rain Corporation, they combined a weird strategy of trotsky I
Speaker 1: neo trotsky philosophy of red terror and fear with Leo
Speaker 1: Strauss's kind of top down fascist model. So it's a
Speaker 1: weird mix of terror and fascism. And that's precise in
Speaker 1: the model. Ran is the corporate fascist structure. And I'm
Speaker 1: saying fascist in the true sense here, not the way
Speaker 1: that woke people misuse it. The idea of running all
Speaker 1: of society on the basis of mathematics quantification. This is
Speaker 1: an old Plato idea. This is You've heard me talk
Speaker 1: about this many times in the Fourth Hour, and that's
Speaker 1: really what the Rand strategist developed here, and they decided
Speaker 1: that they could bring into play all of these fear tactics.
Speaker 1: This is the key that I'm trying to get across here,
Speaker 1: is that what they mastered was from red terror adopting
Speaker 1: the notion of fear on a mask global scale. And
Speaker 1: this is what the Cold War was, especially all of
Speaker 1: the continued pressure of nuclear war, nuclear threats, and you
Speaker 1: could debate how real that was in terms of what
Speaker 1: capabilities the Soviet Union really had at the time. But regardless, nowadays,
Speaker 1: analysis is it's admitted that a lot of this was
Speaker 1: hyped up. It was exaggerated on the basis of things
Speaker 1: like NSC sixty eight, which said that we've got to
Speaker 1: move America into a global strategy of beyond containment and
Speaker 1: into outright mutually sure destruction, straight up cold war. And
Speaker 1: so this occurred in this really kick ran into gear
Speaker 1: and amazingly ran put what started talking about what would
Speaker 1: have to happen to change America into not just a
Speaker 1: global police force, but a consumerist nation. Move it away
Speaker 1: from a production economy where do production goes to places
Speaker 1: like China, right, and we become a service based economy.
Speaker 1: We become a economy that completely shifts. And it's going
Speaker 1: to take many, many decades obviously for this to have
Speaker 1: its full effect, which we're in now. We are now
Speaker 1: in the phases of great reset. Is what the culmination
Speaker 1: of these old Rand plans were was to bring us
Speaker 1: to this fear based, austerity based collapse situation where you
Speaker 1: have a year zero where do we get year zero
Speaker 1: from great reset? Right? That comes from the Jacobins in
Speaker 1: the French Revolution. The Jacobins, the radical Illuminati faction in
Speaker 1: the French Revolution. They believe that they could reset all
Speaker 1: of society. They were original pioneers of a reset. And
Speaker 1: the idea would be that you could have a totally
Speaker 1: new system laid over on top of that, and you
Speaker 1: could even give new holidays, right, fake made up holidays
Speaker 1: like Thermidor and all these weird things that these communists
Speaker 1: had made up. But they were early predecessors to technocracy
Speaker 1: and later people like Augustkampte, Saint Simone, philosophers like a
Speaker 1: Giuseppe Mazzini. A lot of these communists were really people
Speaker 1: who wanted to have a technocratic order, and so a
Speaker 1: lot of the corporate elite and the making elite saw
Speaker 1: commonality there. They believed that they had the same ultimate
Speaker 1: end goal. So what I'm trying to explain is that
Speaker 1: although on one level it's true that people that are collectivists,
Speaker 1: people that are Marxists, that are socialists are in opposition
Speaker 1: to their dialectical opponents of the Adam Smith and Rand
Speaker 1: you know, hardcore capitalist models. One thing that Rand noticed
Speaker 1: was that they would have to smash these two ideas
Speaker 1: together to produce the result, the synthesis, which is technocracy,
Speaker 1: and that's where we are. It is so obvious that
Speaker 1: what we have in today's society is the result of
Speaker 1: this this conflict that was really managed and steered. Again,
Speaker 1: there was a lot of people who were really fighting
Speaker 1: each other. There was a lot of real espionage going
Speaker 1: on between Soviet spies and the CIA and all this
Speaker 1: kind of stuff, But really this global conflict had a
Speaker 1: long term secret goal. And oddly enough, certain movies actually
Speaker 1: capture this idea, believe it or not. Not just two
Speaker 1: thousand and one, which you've seen me deconstructive done many analyzes,
Speaker 1: many even documentary analysis of Kubrick's two thousand and one.
Speaker 1: There's a sequel that's lesser known, that was lesser popular,
Speaker 1: that's actually about the very thing I'm talking about today,
Speaker 1: twenty ten and twenty ten is not the best movie.
Speaker 1: It's kind of boring. But where it goes in the
Speaker 1: philosophy of the film. With Arthur C. Clark, who was
Speaker 1: in the circles of these aluminus and these technocrats, he
Speaker 1: was actually writing those novels about the very types of
Speaker 1: plans that I'm talking about, what they had in store
Speaker 1: for that long term, you know, twenty first century strategy
Speaker 1: of bringing in the new fourth Industrial Revolution, the new society,
Speaker 1: and what in that What that film presents is a
Speaker 1: world where the Cold War gives rise to the discovery
Speaker 1: of what alien life and the implementation of technocracy. And
Speaker 1: at the end of the film, I'm spoiler alert, it's
Speaker 1: not any it's not a big giveaway to spoil this
Speaker 1: boring movie. But at the end of this boring movie,
Speaker 1: you have the the idea that they're the AI is
Speaker 1: basically the aliens, and they're planting life on new planets
Speaker 1: under the banner of Lucifer and they talk about themselves
Speaker 1: as children of the Sun, right where the old onto
Speaker 1: the Sun. And there's these weird prophecies and predictions about
Speaker 1: going into the planet, into the universe and planting life
Speaker 1: on new planets, and so we kind of become our
Speaker 1: own creators, where the alien panspermia people who spawn the
Speaker 1: life on other planets with the aid of the Black
Speaker 1: Monolith cube, which is AI. Right, I'm not saying all
Speaker 1: that's necessarily true. I'm just saying that the philosophy of
Speaker 1: the film and of the novel is precisely that that
Speaker 1: the Luciferian model of technocracy is not just to bring
Speaker 1: about a world government. It's actually to become posthuman. That's
Speaker 1: the message of the movie. And in three thousand one,
Speaker 1: which is the third one, it's actually the full on
Speaker 1: transhumanism where they merge with the AI or the alien entities,
Speaker 1: and that story aliens are basically AI, so they kind
Speaker 1: of merge the two. And you can look at something
Speaker 1: like The Child is In as well as another example
Speaker 1: of this. So how are we getting between aliens and
Speaker 1: technocracy and Cold War? Well, if we go back again
Speaker 1: to the Rand studies, one thing that they know, one
Speaker 1: thing that they not is that they could actually further
Speaker 1: in their plans by scaring the crap out of everyone
Speaker 1: through the notion of global destruction. So at that time,
Speaker 1: it was the bomb, it was the Soviet Union ICBMs, right,
Speaker 1: that was the global global destruction. And then we know,
Speaker 1: as we get a few decades ahead of this, the
Speaker 1: Club of Rome comes up with the idea of pollution
Speaker 1: and the environment being the great destructive, the great threat.
Speaker 1: If we're all going to die, we're all gonna be destroyed.
Speaker 1: Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lawrence are in this new movie
Speaker 1: Don't Look Up, which is about how the scientists are
Speaker 1: going to save us, but Earth is going to is
Speaker 1: actually going to just blow up from a meteor because
Speaker 1: we don't listen to the science. And there's basically a
Speaker 1: whole Trump sort of crowd of people that are the
Speaker 1: people that say, don't look at science. Uh, and the
Speaker 1: whole world is blown up because nobody listens to science.
Speaker 1: These are the kind of propaganda strategies that are dreamt
Speaker 1: up at places like the Rand Corporation. That's what I'm
Speaker 1: trying to get at, and that movie is precisely about that, right,
Speaker 1: It's about scaring everybody, and everybody who doesn't listen to
Speaker 1: science is a dumb Trump supporter and all this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. And the irony is that it's actually the opposite.
Speaker 1: That's usually how propaganda works, is that you do the opposite, right,
Speaker 1: don't go anywhere. When we come back, we're you get
Speaker 1: deeper into this Rand Corporation secret. Welcome back to the
Speaker 1: Alex johnes Trun your guest host Jay Dyer of Jays Analysis. Now,
Speaker 1: early on in the book. One of the things that
Speaker 1: Alex Ebea discusses is the Gaither Report and the rise
Speaker 1: of the technocracy, the military and diceral complex, the very
Speaker 1: things that everybody knows about from the Eisenhower speech that
Speaker 1: he warned about. He was warning about the things that
Speaker 1: were being discussed at the Rand Corporation. And remember they
Speaker 1: had known and planned the world government far before the
Speaker 1: Rank Corporation came into being, right, this goes back to
Speaker 1: at least the time of the technocrats of the French
Speaker 1: Revolution and afterwards the French socialist technocrats, and you could
Speaker 1: argue even further back to just the idea of world empires.
Speaker 1: But when we notice the strange parallels between what the
Speaker 1: technocrats were saying back of the time of the Rand Corporation,
Speaker 1: what we're seeing people like Gates and Klaus Schwab and
Speaker 1: these people say now publicly is that it's a common
Speaker 1: continuity of agenda plan. Going back at the Gaither Report,
Speaker 1: noted that it was time to bring in a global
Speaker 1: order on the basis of a technocratic AI run basically
Speaker 1: computerized society automation, the very same thing that I showed
Speaker 1: you in the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars document the
Speaker 1: last time we did a fourth hour. Participants in this
Speaker 1: gather report included the Ford Foundation, it included the National
Speaker 1: Security Council, and included multiple other corporate entities basically getting
Speaker 1: together and discussing, in coordination with the Rand Corporation, how
Speaker 1: to engineer society into this new order. And I really
Speaker 1: call it a new world order of a one party
Speaker 1: technocratic system worldwide that would eventually merge the United States
Speaker 1: and the Soviet Union. This is oftentimes called the Third Way.
Speaker 1: And this was popular terminology back at the time of
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton and in the in the nineties, and I
Speaker 1: don't think that terminology is really used anymore. But that's
Speaker 1: really what the end goal was of the Cold War
Speaker 1: on the part of a lot of these Rand Corporation strategists,
Speaker 1: and as on the part of a lot of the
Speaker 1: Council and Form Relations strategists. In fact, there was a
Speaker 1: huge heated debate in the CFR back in the day
Speaker 1: about whether or not they could blend the two together
Speaker 1: into a new technocratic world government. And again I'm just
Speaker 1: pointing out, do you not understand that this is where
Speaker 1: we are now, These dreams are now being realized. This
Speaker 1: was not a conspiracy theory. This is a public academic
Speaker 1: work on the history of the brainchild behind the Cold War,
Speaker 1: the Rand Corporation. Now, well, that does that mean that
Speaker 1: everybody work there, that everybody in these groups is evil.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that. No. And again, this whole system
Speaker 1: functions on the base of compartmentalization, and a lot of
Speaker 1: people in various operations and groups like the military, they
Speaker 1: don't know what's going on in the big picture. They
Speaker 1: just think that I'm fighting for Uncle Sam for the
Speaker 1: good of the country. You're not. You're ultimately fighting for
Speaker 1: a super point one percent technocratic elite who is manipulating
Speaker 1: you into dying for PEPSI vaccines, abortion right, women's rights
Speaker 1: in other countries. That's what you're actually dying for, the
Speaker 1: global technocratic order. And they have at their disposal an
Speaker 1: army of the woke people who work for them. As
Speaker 1: I think everybody who listens to this audience actually knows that,
Speaker 1: right that the woke people are not the real woke people, right,
Speaker 1: The people that in this audience are the real woke
Speaker 1: people who are trying to explain what's really going on.
Speaker 1: And then you have this army of these mobs of
Speaker 1: the what Jacqutta the League calls the tip of the
Speaker 1: sphere of transhumanism right the transhumanists, or the tip of
Speaker 1: the sphere of the new world order, he says. But
Speaker 1: the real magic, I guess you could say of the
Speaker 1: Rand Corporation was in not just fear, but engineering what
Speaker 1: they called the cult of the individual. They actually pioneered
Speaker 1: this idea, and the notion was that if we took
Speaker 1: the philosophy of the selfish motivations of any individual, what
Speaker 1: if we maximalize that idea or the population, and then
Speaker 1: got the population into a rabid consumer philosophy for many decades,
Speaker 1: what effects would that have on the society? And one
Speaker 1: thing they ludied for one thing they learned from studying
Speaker 1: other countries where they'd run these programs and models, like
Speaker 1: in Egypt and in Syria under Miles Copeland. Miles Copeland
Speaker 1: in his book Game of Nations talks about when they
Speaker 1: implemented these strategies of industrialization and Western liberalism and neoliberalism
Speaker 1: and market Hollywood types of marketing Hollywood stuff to people,
Speaker 1: is that the country's population immediately started going down. And
Speaker 1: so they learned that the more that they pumped in Hollywood.
Speaker 1: The more they pumped in this stuff, it led to
Speaker 1: sterilization in the society, both voluntarily and nowadays non voluntarily.
Speaker 1: That's what's going on now right. So the idea was
Speaker 1: that if we weaponize on the one hand, radical atomization
Speaker 1: on the part of the individual in terms of what
Speaker 1: they call game theory and rational choice theory, that the
Speaker 1: individual is always going to choose in their own self interest,
Speaker 1: if they push consumerism to the maximum degree, then what
Speaker 1: that does is that actually fragment, fragments and destroys the society.
Speaker 1: At the same time they pump in toxic culture that
Speaker 1: is the Hollywood, the music industry. Not saying everybody in
Speaker 1: those industries is bad, I'm just talking about the propaganda
Speaker 1: element of those areas of society. Basically weaponizing the arts
Speaker 1: in totality, then what you get is a toxic stew
Speaker 1: And that's precisely why the CIA, for example, in the
Speaker 1: Cold War, went and recruited French philosophers who were deconstructionists, yes, postmodernists,
Speaker 1: recruited by the CIA to promote under the guise of
Speaker 1: the Cold War, abstract art, ugly art, abominable art. Because
Speaker 1: of the psychical effects on of the society to break
Speaker 1: down meaning, the destruction of meaning, deconstructionism, critical theory. These
Speaker 1: are all real strategies and plans and schools of thought
Speaker 1: that they're not made of. They're not conspiracy theory. I
Speaker 1: went to a normal, regular university and I studied these people. Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermass.
Speaker 1: These are real critical theorists who talk about deconstructing society. Now,
Speaker 1: they were a branch of Marxist. They're not Soviet block Marxist.
Speaker 1: They are a branch of Marxist called critical theorists. They
Speaker 1: were brought over by the OSS to help America win
Speaker 1: the war against the fascists and then win the Cold War.
Speaker 1: And how are they doing this through things like the
Speaker 1: Congress of Cultural Freedom, where the CIA spent all of
Speaker 1: this money funding the notion of abstract, degenerate, awful garbage
Speaker 1: art and architecture. Why to supposedly promote quote freedom, but
Speaker 1: all it does is have the opposite effect of destroying
Speaker 1: and degrading the society. And they were arguing, well, we
Speaker 1: have to do this, and this is all again the
Speaker 1: brainchild of people like the Rand Corporation, the CIA, the OSS,
Speaker 1: the think tanks, the Brookings Institute, the Carnegie Endowment, the
Speaker 1: Ford Foundation. It's all the same people, and it's all
Speaker 1: in this book. It's all admitted openly that yes, they
Speaker 1: had this plan that we have to change America radically
Speaker 1: so that now at that time, the myth, the lie
Speaker 1: was so that America can win the Cold War. So
Speaker 1: that we can and who was also another big figure
Speaker 1: in this, Brazinski Kissinger, we got to win the Cold War.
Speaker 1: The same people who are saying that they don't care
Speaker 1: about America. They're not loyal to any nation. They're internationalists,
Speaker 1: they're not care about America winning some Cold war. They
Speaker 1: want the technocratic world government. Razenski wrote the book Between
Speaker 1: Two Ages, the Technocratic era. You think he cared about America,
Speaker 1: The whole book is about that. He doesn't care about America.
Speaker 1: America is intended to, like a snake, shed its skin
Speaker 1: and turn into this engine to bring in the new
Speaker 1: world order. Now, I'm not saying that America's bad. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of great people in America. America's founding documents
Speaker 1: and ideology have a lot of great plans and strategies,
Speaker 1: a lot of rights of the individual, a lot of
Speaker 1: rule of law, these are all great things, But what
Speaker 1: I'm saying is that these people transitioned America into something else.
Speaker 1: And what we're going through in this country, especially in
Speaker 1: the last few years, is the battle to not become
Speaker 1: and turn into that, this global technocratic of the new
Speaker 1: World order. And that's the battle that's being fought right
Speaker 1: now in this country. We are in the midst of
Speaker 1: the very thing that was planned decades and decades and
Speaker 1: decades ago. And the reason I keep harping on the
Speaker 1: old documents in fifty sixty years ago stuff is because
Speaker 1: we can't understand what we're fighting and how to fight
Speaker 1: it until we understand how we got here and what
Speaker 1: we're actually up against. And a lot of people might
Speaker 1: find this, you know, disheartening or oh, we can't do that,
Speaker 1: it's too much. All you have to do is recognize
Speaker 1: that it's a bunch of lies and it's a plan.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's number one. Once you see this, the fear,
Speaker 1: the same fear that was being pumped out NonStop in
Speaker 1: the Cold War, is the fear that's being pumped out
Speaker 1: to you right now with all the lies about the
Speaker 1: Kufid and all this nonsense. It's the exact same psychological
Speaker 1: strategy of fear, fear, fear, fear of fear, fear of
Speaker 1: fear of fear. But what was the Cold War? Fear fear,
Speaker 1: fear of it? Get under your desk when the new go.
Speaker 1: Being under a desk isn't going to stop you if
Speaker 1: nukes are going off right, soupoth, This is nonsense, it's crazy.
Speaker 1: Your desk is going to burn up. Dude. You're not
Speaker 1: going to be safe underneath your desk. So there's not
Speaker 1: a global pandemic that's going to kill you, it's fraud.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Alice Jones Show. I'm your guest
Speaker 1: host jaydy er Ja's analysis. If you'd like to support
Speaker 1: my work, you can go to my website Jasonalsis dot
Speaker 1: com and you can subscribe to get access to the
Speaker 1: lectures to multiple years of me analyzing these big, fat,
Speaker 1: boring global elite books. We've done, I don't know fifty
Speaker 1: sixty of them now to date. One of them is,
Speaker 1: of course, the classic alex obeya book Rank Corporation. And
Speaker 1: you can also get signed copies of my books where
Speaker 1: I make this kind of accessible to people through an
Speaker 1: analysis of film. Because one thing that Aba mentions in
Speaker 1: many places in his book is the fact that the
Speaker 1: Rank Corporation consulted and work with a lot of directors, producers,
Speaker 1: a lot of Hollywood people to help put nuclear war
Speaker 1: cold war themes throughout Hollywood movies. And what this did
Speaker 1: was amp up the fear. So where do they get
Speaker 1: this idea? Well, because again a lot of the people
Speaker 1: in this model are familiar with terror, red terror and
Speaker 1: using that as a strategy for social engineering. So I
Speaker 1: mentioned the gay the Report and the military industrial complex,
Speaker 1: and I mentioned the many corporate heads that were there
Speaker 1: at this committee meeting to discuss how to scare the
Speaker 1: crap out of everybody and how to make the notion
Speaker 1: of a global cataclysm acceptable so that everybody would just
Speaker 1: do whatever they're told. Right, So, oh, look at the
Speaker 1: pictures of the house blowing up. If you don't do
Speaker 1: what we tell you, everything's just going to be a
Speaker 1: pile of ashes. And they put out all these movies.
Speaker 1: It was countless nuclear age atomic movies. There was the
Speaker 1: Day After which scared the crap out of a TV movie.
Speaker 1: I think Steve Guttenberg's in it. It's pretty hilarious if
Speaker 1: you go watch it now. I recommend going and watching
Speaker 1: The Day After because you watch it now that this
Speaker 1: is so obviously propaganda, which I think Reagan actually had
Speaker 1: a hand in saying we need to put out movies
Speaker 1: like The Day After. It might have been right before Reagan,
Speaker 1: early early eighties, maybe eighty two is when that came out,
Speaker 1: but that was actually a propaganda film, part of an
Speaker 1: example of the kinds of things that I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: It was very popular where the in the Rockefeller Foundation,
Speaker 1: by the way, it was also involved in this in
Speaker 1: this ran a n SC sixty eight, which was the
Speaker 1: idea of we got to absorb or we got to
Speaker 1: to kick this nuclear war off with, or excuse me,
Speaker 1: the Cold war off with this massive global fear campaign. Now,
Speaker 1: multiple examples of this have popped up. Obviously, any world
Speaker 1: war has an element, right, World War one, world War
Speaker 1: two has an element of global threat. But Abea notes
Speaker 1: that what was unique to the nuclear threat and the
Speaker 1: idea of anybody, any nation state, getting a hold of
Speaker 1: nukes and being a rogue state was itself under Bernard
Speaker 1: Baruk at the United Nations, a plan for global government
Speaker 1: and global policing that's in quickly as well quickly has
Speaker 1: a whole section, whole chapter on that. And so the
Speaker 1: problem with the nuclear threat thing is that that's the
Speaker 1: justification back in the fifties sixty seventies four. Oh, we've
Speaker 1: got to have the global government because Kim Jong un,
Speaker 1: because putin anybody could just set off nukes, right, everybody
Speaker 1: can just get nukes and set them off, So, oh,
Speaker 1: we gotta have a global government, right. And what was
Speaker 1: the basis of it Videos of houses being mowed over
Speaker 1: by new nuclear bombs, supposedly h bombs whatever, and that
Speaker 1: scared everybody. All of the schools, all of the boomers
Speaker 1: being told get under your desk, you stop, drop and
Speaker 1: roll and roll under your desk because when the nuke comes,
Speaker 1: like it's just so hilarious, like it's not going to
Speaker 1: do anything. That was on purpose. They were doing those
Speaker 1: things in the schools. They actually funded as well, Rent
Speaker 1: Corporation to KME with the idea of getting everybody to
Speaker 1: buy fallout shelters because this would further the myth scaring people.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's bad to have an emergency shelter.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying that they promoted this idea to scare
Speaker 1: the crap out everybody. Now, how does that relate to now? Well, well,
Speaker 1: go back to the mid to late eighties, and there
Speaker 1: was a new global campaign that started emerging. And there's
Speaker 1: a famous person that's in the news every day today
Speaker 1: that you might not know about, was involved in that
Speaker 1: global fear campaign. It's called the AIDS crisis. And doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci was involved in studying going around to bath houses
Speaker 1: and researching the AIDS pandemic and how this scared people
Speaker 1: and how to get people to adopt medical ideas. Medical
Speaker 1: ideology on the basis of fear campaigns is not can
Speaker 1: you not figure out what's happening? I mean, what do
Speaker 1: you duh? Exactly what we saw there is being used
Speaker 1: now global fear campaign on the basis of what three
Speaker 1: years of this Now, little Koufid has just turned three,
Speaker 1: so we have a troublesome toddler here. The Terrible Threes
Speaker 1: COVID is now three years old. And it's really just
Speaker 1: an analogue too, not just the fears of the Cold War,
Speaker 1: the psychological warfare strategy of global fear, just like we
Speaker 1: see with the Green Agenda, the global fear behind pollution
Speaker 1: and overpopulation that the Club of Rome comes up with
Speaker 1: the first global revolution that's still being rammed through constantly.
Speaker 1: In fact, they even tied COVID and the lockdowns into
Speaker 1: that because oh, look at the Earth has healed, Mama Earth,
Speaker 1: Mammy Earth has healed through the global lockdowns. Now the
Speaker 1: birds are out, the fish are swimming again because of
Speaker 1: evil humans being locked down. And now they're pushing for
Speaker 1: climate lockdowns. And now what's in the news again, connections
Speaker 1: between COVID and AIDS, the autoimmune deficiency problems, the ADE problems.
Speaker 1: Oh now we might actually need something to do with AIDS,
Speaker 1: viruses and new boosters, new immunity in regard to COVID
Speaker 1: and the shots. Interesting because that's exactly what Vauci was doing.
Speaker 1: What twenty twenty five years ago? And if you remember
Speaker 1: the ninety eighties and nineties, I remember you would see
Speaker 1: this all over the TV. Right, there's age age ages.
Speaker 1: Everybody's gonna have ages. Everybody's gonna die, just like the
Speaker 1: ozone hole the ozone. We're gonna be cooked by twenty fifteen,
Speaker 1: everybody's cooked, just like Inconvenient Truth. All we're all going
Speaker 1: to be underwater. All of this is psychological warfare, social engineering,
Speaker 1: fear strategies. And it has nothing to do with what's
Speaker 1: true at all, None of it's true. All it has
Speaker 1: to do is getting you to comply. That's the only
Speaker 1: goal of any of that, getting you to comply. And
Speaker 1: the compliance isn't really even necessarily about whether it's that's
Speaker 1: also a long term goal, if we know, if you
Speaker 1: remember in Lockstep, the compliance was about getting people to
Speaker 1: accept AI and automation. That's the longer term goal of
Speaker 1: the compliance. Yes, there's the element of the initial roll
Speaker 1: out of all these stabbes and the boosters. The long
Speaker 1: term goal is compliance into the technocratic world order. And
Speaker 1: in Klaus's book, in the last section of fourth of
Speaker 1: Noos Revolution, he says that really the long term goal
Speaker 1: is not just automation, but everything being tracked and trace
Speaker 1: and the changing of human biology. Now again this is
Speaker 1: my speculation. This is where I think the faux alien
Speaker 1: threat comes into play. And we don't know how they're
Speaker 1: going to use this, but they keep talking about it.
Speaker 1: It keeps popping up. You go back to the nineteen
Speaker 1: forties and fifties. The whole emergence of the alien UFO
Speaker 1: threat comes through science fiction writing. It comes through HG. Wells,
Speaker 1: it comes through these books that the original crazy people
Speaker 1: who supposedly were abducted, Betty and Barney Hill, Georgia Damski,
Speaker 1: their stories are made up. In fact, it was exposed
Speaker 1: that their stories actually come from science fiction novels at
Speaker 1: the time. Go watch the documentary Mirage Men and explains
Speaker 1: how a lot of the counterintelligence that basically the alien
Speaker 1: nonsense is part of counterintelligence. An interview the people who
Speaker 1: are involved in the counter intelligence operations to give people
Speaker 1: feed people nonsense and disinformation relating to aliens. That's a
Speaker 1: great documentary and it doesn't get into the New age
Speaker 1: sort of cult element to it. But if you know,
Speaker 1: of course, the CIA has a long history of studying
Speaker 1: and being involved in cults and alien cults. And why
Speaker 1: might this be. What's the commonality that we might see
Speaker 1: between studying alien cults, studying fear, global fear, social engineering,
Speaker 1: and pandemics, a new religion to replace biblical Western religions, Christianity,
Speaker 1: et cetera. Well, it all works perfectly into this model
Speaker 1: of the new world order bringing people into the technocracy,
Speaker 1: giving them a new religious mythology, which the Hudson Institute
Speaker 1: documents talk about from the sixties that's more compatible with technocracy.
Speaker 1: In Isaac Asimov's books, found Asimov, who was also hip
Speaker 1: to and in the inner circles of this technocratic new
Speaker 1: World Order plan. He has a front religion that the foundation,
Speaker 1: which is this inner secret society of scientific elite. They
Speaker 1: know the true secrets to the what's really going on,
Speaker 1: which is really just implementation of a AI technocratic run
Speaker 1: government and tracking everybody through mass algorithms and so forth.
Speaker 1: But they have an outer religion that they constructed that's
Speaker 1: a fake front or this tech for this technocratic core group.
Speaker 1: This is exactly what is coming. I'm telling you, this
Speaker 1: is the new narrative. This is what they're pumping. And
Speaker 1: I don't know when, I don't know, there might be
Speaker 1: ten years, but most likely they're going to use an
Speaker 1: alien mythology, an alien lie. You can go back to
Speaker 1: Georgia Dampski and see how from the very beginning Allen DAWs,
Speaker 1: head of the CIA, was actually threatening to sue anyone
Speaker 1: at the time who would question Georgia d'ampski's crazy story.
Speaker 1: Why would you do that? Because the CIA was behind this.
Speaker 1: They were involved in constructing this new mythology. It's the
Speaker 1: very perfect type of plan and strategy that the Rain
Speaker 1: Corporation themselves would cook up. How do we give people
Speaker 1: a new story, a new myth? Ooh, let's make it aliens.
Speaker 1: And the aliens are going to tell you if you
Speaker 1: would only depop just depopulate yourself. Just go get the stabbes,
Speaker 1: just go get the brain chips, just enter into the metaviors.
Speaker 1: We will save you. That's literally what they tell people, right,
Speaker 1: this is the myth, this is the new story. It's
Speaker 1: obviously belowney, don't fall for it. That's what I'm trying
Speaker 1: to tell you here. So when Klaus in the world
Speaker 1: I coming to form, and Gil Bates and all these
Speaker 1: people tell you that the space aliens are here, know
Speaker 1: that it's a lie. Everybody should watch right, if you
Speaker 1: can't read it, go watch the Sci Fi Channel's version
Speaker 1: of Child is In because it's the same pattern Arthurs.
Speaker 1: Cy Clark, by the way, was hanging out in the
Speaker 1: circles of Alistair Croley. So you can look at Carellen right,
Speaker 1: the demon figure there, who literally looks like a demon.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm much We're obvious. Could it be always
Speaker 1: got cloven hoofs? I wonder what this is supposed to
Speaker 1: be I wonder, right, and what does he do? He
Speaker 1: comes and he offers everybody global government, He offers medical miracles,
Speaker 1: He offers a solution to the wars and the famines
Speaker 1: and the pestilences. Right, the alien salvation narrative, which is
Speaker 1: a gnostic mythological narrative. But do you know how spoiler
Speaker 1: alert Childhood's end ends. Well, he does the same same
Speaker 1: thing that Starchild does in the original story of two
Speaker 1: thousand and one. Oh sorry, but in order to save you,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to take your generation of children on
Speaker 1: our spaceship, and we're gonna have to nuke the rest
Speaker 1: of you. So Earth gets nuked, just like in two
Speaker 1: thousand and one, Earth is supposed to be nuked. A
Speaker 1: demon comes to save humanity, to nuke Earth to save us. Again,
Speaker 1: the aliens are always doing what the global elite are doing.
Speaker 1: Why are the aliens always Malthusian? It just happens to
Speaker 1: be the case that the aliens are, you know, maltheusing
Speaker 1: It just happens to be the case of their Oh,
Speaker 1: it just happens to be the case of their demons,
Speaker 1: and that they say the same things demons say, right, Oh,
Speaker 1: kill everybody for us, and we'll give you a utopia, right,
Speaker 1: wink wink. I mean, it's so obviously the looney, it's
Speaker 1: so obviously propaganda and is so obviously demonic. And so
Speaker 1: that's how this narrative, this fake story fits into the
Speaker 1: mythos of the Great Reset, is that it's exact exactly
Speaker 1: the religious pattern of the things that Klaus the global
Speaker 1: elites push. Mankind is the problem. Man has to be
Speaker 1: put to death because he is a resource vampire. He's
Speaker 1: sucking up all the resources. He's you know, harming the
Speaker 1: planet through climate right through his exhalations of carbon dioxide,
Speaker 1: and carbon dioxide is a toxin, none of which is true,
Speaker 1: by the way, And so it's all fake. It's fake
Speaker 1: and gray.
Speaker 2: People pat me on the back all the time, and
Speaker 2: I really really appreciate it, but I want you to
Speaker 2: understand something. Don't put the horse in front of the
Speaker 2: cart here, don't put the wagon in front of the
Speaker 2: mules here. If you weren't supporting us, if you weren't
Speaker 2: praying for us, if you weren't spreading the word, we
Speaker 2: wouldn't be on air anymore and we wouldn't have a
Speaker 2: shot at defeating the New World Order like we have
Speaker 2: right now. So now more than ever, please visit info
Speaker 2: warstore dot com and get great products that make you
Speaker 2: and your family's lives better and that fund the Info War,
Speaker 2: that fights tearning that also makes your lives better. A
Speaker 2: lot of people are counting on Info Wars to stay
Speaker 2: on the air, so I'm counting on you to keep
Speaker 2: us on the air. We're going to defeat the globals,
Speaker 2: but it's not going to happen easy. We need God
Speaker 2: on our side. We've got to take action. Three of
Speaker 2: our best selling products are back in stock x three
Speaker 2: biggest sell ever sixty percent off, free shipping, highest quality
Speaker 2: Ultimate Crill oil back in stock, forty percent off, biotrucellinium
Speaker 2: sold out for months, back in stock fifty percent off.
Speaker 2: Get products to make you and your life better and
Speaker 2: support the Info War A three sixty win.
Speaker 1: We were talking about mutations, and we were talking about
Speaker 1: different plans in the past that I've been on, and
Speaker 1: I wanted to kind of follow up with what I
Speaker 1: see the UFO Alien psyop to be. So you know,
Speaker 1: Alex has had quite a few guests on I think
Speaker 1: John either John Bound or Gregris have done some reports
Speaker 1: which were really good highlighting some of these topics. And
Speaker 1: I've got quite a bit of information on this because
Speaker 1: I did several sections in my book on the notion
Speaker 1: of alien propaganda. Why is Hollywood so married to this?
Speaker 1: Is it just to make money or is there a
Speaker 1: deeper agenda at work here? And it relates to the
Speaker 1: Great Reset because even to my surprise, right in that
Speaker 1: video that we saw earlier, where you know, four years
Speaker 1: ago the world economic before and put out a viral
Speaker 1: video on Twitter saying here's the eight or ten things
Speaker 1: that will be you know, the characteristic events in the
Speaker 1: next ten years. You will see alien life. I think
Speaker 1: was number five or six or so in that sequence.
Speaker 1: And in my book, I did a whole analysis of
Speaker 1: a Brookings Institute doctor document and this is actually from
Speaker 1: one of the top think tanks. There is a famous
Speaker 1: academic er names Brenda Densler. She wrote a book on
Speaker 1: UFO cults and the manipulation and social engineering that could
Speaker 1: be used to be had through alien cults and alien engineering.
Speaker 1: And in this nineteen I believe sixty eight NASA Brookings
Speaker 1: Institute report, it says, quote the Christian religion would be
Speaker 1: particularly compromised by the discovery of extraterrestrial life, since it
Speaker 1: makes so much of the incarnation of Christ as a
Speaker 1: historical event and of the knowledge of the good news
Speaker 1: of Jesus Christ's passion, ascension, and atonement as the simquanon
Speaker 1: of salvation. This fact would thus be irreconcilable with divine providence. Again,
Speaker 1: that's from a nineteen sixty eight NASA Brookings Institute report. Now,
Speaker 1: if the elite, the strategists of social engineers have known
Speaker 1: that since the sixties, I think it's a good bet
Speaker 1: that when we look at the history of of the
Speaker 1: so called UFO phenomenon, the outbreak of all these sightings
Speaker 1: and whatnot going back to the forties, certain people in
Speaker 1: certain events were chosen to be actually propped up. The
Speaker 1: first of which, of course, is the Georgia Dampski story. Right,
Speaker 1: He's one of the first close encounter abductee type persons
Speaker 1: where he had this direct encounter, and then it was
Speaker 1: later outed that this was curiously parallel to his science
Speaker 1: fiction book that had been written around the same time,
Speaker 1: and so a lot of people started calling out Georgia
Speaker 1: Damski as a fraud and none other than the head
Speaker 1: of the CIA himself. I believe it was Helms stepped
Speaker 1: up to the plate to prosecute anybody who would call
Speaker 1: out or question the narrative of George Adamski. Soon after
Speaker 1: that you have the story of Betty and Barney Hill.
Speaker 1: There another early case of abductees, and what do you know,
Speaker 1: Betty and Barney Hill go on to start an alien cult. Now,
Speaker 1: the interplay between intelligence agecies, cults, psychological operations, and alien
Speaker 1: phenomena is always there. There's always this link. They're always
Speaker 1: in the background. And in fact, some of the biggest
Speaker 1: cults of the twentieth century have what you could call
Speaker 1: exo theology. All that means is space opera. It means
Speaker 1: a theology of space, or a mythology of the planets
Speaker 1: and the beings or the entities or the interdimensional angels,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it, which are really just
Speaker 1: replacements for aliens. They're all talking about basically the same thing.
Speaker 1: And as I mentioned Alex, there's this notion of what's
Speaker 1: called function stacking, right. We saw that with the Kufit
Speaker 1: and all that nonsense, right, that it served multiple purposes
Speaker 1: in multiple agendas. Well, the UFO phenomenon bears all of
Speaker 1: those same patterns of function stacking multiple use cases. So
Speaker 1: early on, in say the Cold War period, the UFO
Speaker 1: phenomenon served as a good deflection. It was a red
Speaker 1: herring right to dupe foreign analysis to cover for maybe
Speaker 1: experimental stealth aircraft that were being developed, right, the stealth
Speaker 1: bomber or whatever. And in fact, famous CIA operator of
Speaker 1: Miles Copeland was actually involved in staging some of these
Speaker 1: events back in the sixties to dupe the Chinese, believe
Speaker 1: it or not, and it worked so well that the
Speaker 1: information that was intended to dupe the Chinese came back
Speaker 1: domestically to the US and the sixties, and an early
Speaker 1: UFO alien cult sprung out of that. In this cult,
Speaker 1: by the way, tacked on a new gospel to the
Speaker 1: Bible which detailed the alien rapture. So they actually co
Speaker 1: opted this dispensationalist evangelical doctrine of the rapture and tied
Speaker 1: that into the alien mythology. Oh, the space brothers are
Speaker 1: going to come. They're going to beam you up into
Speaker 1: the ship or whatever one thinks. Immediately here of right,
Speaker 1: Heaven's Gate, Marshall Applewhite, right, and definitely there are fed connections,
Speaker 1: believe it or not, to the Heaven's Gate cult. Jim
Speaker 1: Jones's cult had a exo theology space component. A lot
Speaker 1: of people don't know this, but actually Jim Jones said
Speaker 1: that the universe was part of this big space opera
Speaker 1: and if people followed his cult, and they followed his dictates,
Speaker 1: they would be led into the heavenly vaults the many mansions. Right,
Speaker 1: So they take these verses in the Bible and many
Speaker 1: mansions that means space brothers, that means aliens. Right, But
Speaker 1: the pattern is always the same. Right, we see intelligence
Speaker 1: agencies in the background, deep state people. And it's not
Speaker 1: surprising because where does the alien mythos in the twentieth
Speaker 1: century actually come from? Does it come from people who
Speaker 1: saw strange, unexplained phenomenon which definitely exist. Sure, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of inexplicable stellar spatial phenomenon, But does it follow
Speaker 1: from that that it's therefore space brothers or extra biological ets. No,
Speaker 1: that's a non sequitor right in logic, that's a no,
Speaker 1: it doesn't follow. So the fact that there's inexplicable phenomenon
Speaker 1: doesn't automatically lead to the conclusion that it's beings from
Speaker 1: other planets who are biological entities who evolved like us
Speaker 1: or something. But why does so many people think that
Speaker 1: it does. Why does so many people think that strange
Speaker 1: aerial phenomenon automatically leads to extra biological entities. Well, this
Speaker 1: is the role that Hollywood played. This is the role
Speaker 1: that the science fiction machine played. Where does the science
Speaker 1: fiction machine derive its origins? Well, for us in the
Speaker 1: twentieth century, there's no other figure more important than AHG. Wells.
Speaker 1: So I've been going back and reading some of these
Speaker 1: fiction works by Wells or Well Huxley, and it's amazing
Speaker 1: at the multifunction level that these books played, right, So
Speaker 1: they're not just kind of telling you at one level
Speaker 1: what's going on. They're really setting the stage for the
Speaker 1: inculcation of a new paradigm, a new worldview, just as
Speaker 1: that Brookings Institute document said, will institute a new paradigm,
Speaker 1: a new worldview based around an alien mythology, aliens seated us. Here,
Speaker 1: we're just the creation of alien engineers, right like out
Speaker 1: of Ridley Scott's Prometheus. Literally, so really Scott Prometheus is
Speaker 1: literally based on the ideas of Watson Krick even Isaac Newton. Right,
Speaker 1: these people were they believed in the notion of panspermia,
Speaker 1: that we were seated here by some others planet or
Speaker 1: perhaps by intelligent ARCon engineers. Right. And all of that
Speaker 1: is relevant because it doesn't matter so much whether it's
Speaker 1: true or false, or to what degree is tru or false.
Speaker 1: I mean, I believe it is, but the point is false.
Speaker 1: But the point is that if they can get the
Speaker 1: majority of the population to believe this, then it can
Speaker 1: be used as a strategic social engineering tool to just
Speaker 1: further funnel people into the world government. The alien space
Speaker 1: religion has a very good chance of being used by
Speaker 1: the elite to be part of the global religion. The
Speaker 1: global government will need a global religion. Ah. She Wells
Speaker 1: even said that don't go anywhere, it will be right back.
Speaker 1: This is the Alex Jones Show and I'm Jay Diwer
Speaker 1: of Jason Elsis. Welcome back to the Alex Jones Show.
Speaker 1: On your guest host Jay Diary. Jay's analysis, we were
Speaker 1: covering the story of alien deception propaganda, how it's being used,
Speaker 1: and an important thing to remember is that there were
Speaker 1: several key movies back in the forties and fifties that
Speaker 1: came out, they really promoted this idea, one of the
Speaker 1: most famous of which, of course, was The Day the
Speaker 1: Earth Stood Still. And if you go back and watch
Speaker 1: that film, it's amazing the level of overt propaganda in
Speaker 1: that film. In fact, the Klatu character, right, everybody knows
Speaker 1: who this alien is. He comes and he threatens to
Speaker 1: destroy earth because Earth is unevolved and the humans are
Speaker 1: violent or whatever. So diarrhy, of course is he's going
Speaker 1: to kill everybody because humans are violent. Isn't that an
Speaker 1: action of violence? Right, So it's like it's kind of
Speaker 1: defeats the purpose of what he says he's here to do.
Speaker 1: But you'll notice that the motivations and justifications that the
Speaker 1: aliens often give in of movies just happens to coincide
Speaker 1: with the Malthusian attitude of the of the global elite,
Speaker 1: right that, oh, we have to solve the problem of
Speaker 1: humanity by getting rid of humanity right before we become posthuman.
Speaker 1: That will solve the problem of what it is to
Speaker 1: the human Let's get rid of the humans, right, And
Speaker 1: this character, Clatu was intentionally intended to be a replacement
Speaker 1: Jesus character, all right, So the background to this is
Speaker 1: in nineteen forty nine there was a scientist named doctor
Speaker 1: James Lip and he wrote this report called Project Sign,
Speaker 1: and Project Sign went into what would be the plot
Speaker 1: of Day the Earth Stood Still. There's a famous figure
Speaker 1: involved in the production of the Day the Earth Stood Still,
Speaker 1: a famous CIA psychological warfare figure named C. D. Jackson.
Speaker 1: You may have heard of him. He's the guy behind
Speaker 1: the doctrinal warfare program where the CIA, as we know
Speaker 1: from the whim off the book, attempted to co opt
Speaker 1: and did successfully co opt in Roman Catholic Church during
Speaker 1: the Cold War. Now, this project was intended to create
Speaker 1: a CIA or an oss last CIA narrative that would be
Speaker 1: used to socially engineer the notion of science, progress, denuclearization,
Speaker 1: all these kinds of ideas that were so called progressive
Speaker 1: at the time. And another way we know this is
Speaker 1: the case is that the head of twentieth Century Fox
Speaker 1: at that time, Daryl Zanak, actually went to the Office
Speaker 1: of Wartime Intelligence and told the OWI, you can have
Speaker 1: twentieth century Fox to do whatever you want in terms
Speaker 1: of propaganda. So again, all the way back in the
Speaker 1: forties and fifties, the very beginning of the OSS and CIA.
Speaker 1: You had the immediate usage of Hollywood for propaganda, and now,
Speaker 1: of course Hollywood was being used prior to that. But
Speaker 1: these are just great examples. And another key documentary I
Speaker 1: would recommend people see if they haven't seen it, it's
Speaker 1: called miraj Men. Mirajmen. I think it's free on YouTube.
Speaker 1: It's just an investigation into how the alien UFO narrative
Speaker 1: was used in several instances of psychological warfare and disinformation.
Speaker 1: So again, I'm not claiming that it's all fake, or
Speaker 1: that there's no unexplained phenomena, or that there's no spiritual
Speaker 1: component or dimension. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying
Speaker 1: that one important aspect or angle is the disinformation psychological
Speaker 1: warfare angle. And in fact, in that documentary they interview
Speaker 1: multiple counterintelligence operatives, including Richard Doty, who talks about how, yes,
Speaker 1: we would just pick a narcissistic kind of self involved,
Speaker 1: self important individuals who we would give this run around
Speaker 1: that let's go meet General so and so at a base.
Speaker 1: He's got some important things to tell you, and General
Speaker 1: so and so and brings them in and he pops
Speaker 1: a tape into the VCR and show's son, we chosen
Speaker 1: you to be the information outlet for the dissemination of
Speaker 1: our covenant that we've made with the space beings. And
Speaker 1: by the way, here's this fuzzy, grainy VHS tape of
Speaker 1: the alien ship taken off at the Air Force base
Speaker 1: and all it was was literally a video created by
Speaker 1: a guy who made Star Trek Next Generations special effects.
Speaker 1: They interview all the people in the documentary, right, So
Speaker 1: this is a key thing to see through this obvious deception.
Speaker 1: Now it's not just old you know, sixties fifties, you
Speaker 1: know CIA narratives or science fiction narratives that promoted this.
Speaker 1: There was also black ops groups the aviary. There was
Speaker 1: also black operations that were done to use alien and
Speaker 1: cryptozoological narratives. I'm not joking by the CIA to do
Speaker 1: people during the Cold War. There are famous cases of
Speaker 1: this in Latin and South America where they would actually
Speaker 1: use Mary and apparitions literally in Latin and South America
Speaker 1: to say, oh, look, Mary has appeared, and she's telling
Speaker 1: everybody that you know, you go fight in this X
Speaker 1: Y Z war warfare operation, this gorilla operation whatever. Don't
Speaker 1: listen to the opposition there of the devil and Mary
Speaker 1: says it right again, we can begin to see how
Speaker 1: this might be the explanation for other events like this.
Speaker 1: In fact, even some Catholic analysts and traditional Catholic theologians
Speaker 1: have opined that the Meji Gory apparitions perhaps could fit
Speaker 1: into this Cold War narrative of Mary suddenly appearing and
Speaker 1: giving the messages that just happened to back up right
Speaker 1: the CIA's narrative in the Cold War. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that that makes the Soviets good, right, So both sides
Speaker 1: of the Cold War engaged in these kinds of deceptions.
Speaker 1: It's including the Soviets, including the West. But I'm just
Speaker 1: saying that we have its specific documented instances. In fact,
Speaker 1: Victor Marquetti in his book I Believe it's CIA and
Speaker 1: Cult of Intelligence, or it's one of his books, he
Speaker 1: talks about them using in the Philippines the mythology of
Speaker 1: a local vampire myth right, and basically staging vampire events
Speaker 1: right to utilize the psychology of fear during some CIA
Speaker 1: black operation. So we have documented instances of different intelligence
Speaker 1: operations and networks using cults. In fact, let's not forget
Speaker 1: one of the greatest examples Alister Crowley himself. Crowley was
Speaker 1: an agent an asset for mi I five. This has
Speaker 1: been well documented in the book Secret Agent sixty sixty
Speaker 1: six by doctor Richard Spence. And we know that Crowley
Speaker 1: was being used to send messages out to different people
Speaker 1: who respected his esoteric so called analysis, to basically bait
Speaker 1: people like Rudolph Has to fly into Scotland that was
Speaker 1: actually a British intelligence operation. Ian Fleming was involved in
Speaker 1: sort of being being part of that operation to get
Speaker 1: has to fly into Scotland. That was a British intelligence
Speaker 1: and they so they used Croley to do this, right well.
Speaker 1: Crowley also is one of the founders of the modern
Speaker 1: alien mythos because he claimed that the entities that he
Speaker 1: were into, that he was interacting with and channeling and
Speaker 1: all this stuff were beings that he wrote he drew
Speaker 1: pictures of, one of which is called Lamb, and Lamb
Speaker 1: just happens to look exactly like the modern grays, right.
Speaker 1: He looks just like the description of an alien. And
Speaker 1: in fact, today people who follow the Crollian route of
Speaker 1: his satanic invocations, they will actually say we're doing nothing
Speaker 1: else than interacting with interdimensional entities or what other people
Speaker 1: call aliens. In fact, people from Hollywood who claim to
Speaker 1: have been involved in Croley cult will say, yeah, we're
Speaker 1: just talking to aliens. Yeah, there you go, there's lamb. Right.
Speaker 1: The aliens are the same things that we're invoking in
Speaker 1: our ceremonial rituals, in our trance states, or when we're
Speaker 1: doing high doses of LSD or when we're doing DMT
Speaker 1: or whatever. It's the same entities. And why is it
Speaker 1: that the entities always have the same message? Again, they
Speaker 1: always tell people, bro, just set up a global government, dude,
Speaker 1: and like everybody would be like happy. And then you know,
Speaker 1: everybody could just be like you know, Washington porno of
Speaker 1: all day and like we could all could just be
Speaker 1: like Coomers in space or whatever, like it'll be awesome
Speaker 1: or whatever. Right, that's the literally the narrative that all
Speaker 1: of the aliens and the DMT clockworkalves tell everybody that
Speaker 1: goes into those dimensions, and it's not act. So that's
Speaker 1: the demonic component to this, right, And then there's the
Speaker 1: deep state dark component to this, the black ops component,
Speaker 1: which no better example than the figure of who was,
Speaker 1: by the way, a devotee of Crowley Michael Achino. Colonel
Speaker 1: Michael Achino was instrumental in formulating the modern Army's psychological
Speaker 1: warfare doctrine. He wrote a famous essay, I think it's
Speaker 1: mind war to cywar, and at the end of that
Speaker 1: document he says that we're going to have to geoengineer.
Speaker 1: We're going to have to change the atmosphere. He says,
Speaker 1: human cells operate like antennae. We're gonna have to mutate man,
Speaker 1: right and basically blast him with different frequencies. This is
Speaker 1: in the footnotes of his famous Army document. And then
Speaker 1: thereby we can mutate man. Now. Who was Michael Aquino, Well,
Speaker 1: he's not just a famous Satanist. He also started a
Speaker 1: Satanant cult called the Temple of Set. He studied under
Speaker 1: Levey for a while and was a devotee of Crowley
Speaker 1: before going on to start his own cult. But he
Speaker 1: was also one of the key researchers at Spacecom for
Speaker 1: many years, and then he went on to do deep
Speaker 1: intense research in MK ultra, in MK Naomi MK search.
Speaker 1: So Michael Akino, who studied the UFO phenomenon at space Com,
Speaker 1: who studies mkultra, who then rights the Army's part of
Speaker 1: the army's psychological warfare doctrine. Right, is it any surprise
Speaker 1: that we see so many parallels to the UFO phenomenon
Speaker 1: and the Satanic ritual abuse phenomenon, right, and the mind
Speaker 1: control MK ultra phenomenon. They're all connected because it's the
Speaker 1: same people who run these scams. Welcome Mack to the
Speaker 1: Alexi Joneshow I'm just host Jay dier Dased analysis. We
Speaker 1: were getting into the parallels and similarities between the people
Speaker 1: who undergo different versions of ritual abuse. The accounts that
Speaker 1: we have of people who underwent various studies in the
Speaker 1: MK ultra panorama was actually a whole bunch of different studies,
Speaker 1: and then the military research into psychological warfare and alien engineering.
Speaker 1: So let's remember that there's many other alien cults, right
Speaker 1: that we can point to. Scientology, Remember that l Ron
Speaker 1: Hubbard came out of the Krollian system of gradations and hierarchy.
Speaker 1: Once he graduated Crolly system, he went to go. He
Speaker 1: went on to create his own cult, right, which was scientology,
Speaker 1: and scientology has an elaborate space opera mythology as well. Right,
Speaker 1: you were seated by aliens and you've got to clear
Speaker 1: your body of all the alien leftovers or whatever, and
Speaker 1: this is part of their whole auditing mind control process.
Speaker 1: So these are all basically stamped out in a lab. Right,
Speaker 1: the model of the alien cult is pretty much always
Speaker 1: the same, and there's others as well. The Order of
Speaker 1: the Solar Temple is another Krollian sort of alien type
Speaker 1: of gnostic cult. They all bear those similar patterns and stamps.
Speaker 1: And I think that a lot of them, maybe not
Speaker 1: every one of them, but many of them were kind
Speaker 1: of part of what the study manipulation and what use
Speaker 1: would this kind of a religion be. Well, we've seen
Speaker 1: the Vatican actually in the last few years come out
Speaker 1: and kind of hint that admitting the possibility, Oh maybe
Speaker 1: there are alien lives out there. Maybe when the aliens
Speaker 1: show up, we'll have to baptize aliens. Maybe they can
Speaker 1: be saved too. Maybe we should just revise all of
Speaker 1: our religions, and oh maybe all of the world religions
Speaker 1: were more or less kind of just teaching us this
Speaker 1: alien myth. Right, so they all have fragments of the truth,
Speaker 1: and then the real religion is the overall right alien mythos,
Speaker 1: the superstructure religion or something like that. Now, I think
Speaker 1: it was a good chance that they could play that card.
Speaker 1: I think what they do is that the elite is
Speaker 1: that they will actually float different ideas and articles and
Speaker 1: see the response and wait and see if the public
Speaker 1: has basically been engineered to a point where they believe
Speaker 1: in or are susceptible to the accepting of the alien mythos.
Speaker 1: So they're probably not at that level yet, even though
Speaker 1: studies do show a growing percentile of people that do
Speaker 1: accept the alien origins myth. And this is why we
Speaker 1: have the new atheists basically, right Richard Dawkins, people like
Speaker 1: this coming out. I believe that alien life is definitely possible.
Speaker 1: We were seated by aliens. That's probably likely, very much true,
Speaker 1: maybe probably right. And that's more reasonable somehow than God.
Speaker 1: I don't know why that would be more more reasonable
Speaker 1: than God. But behind all of this, of course, is
Speaker 1: the manipulation and planning of the Leef state. And that's
Speaker 1: why Klaus can come out and say there would be
Speaker 1: a discovery of alien life the next several years. Doers
Speaker 1: in have no private property. The aliens just happen to
Speaker 1: magically want what the wild Economic Forum wants. The aliens
Speaker 1: just happen to want you to take a microchip, right,
Speaker 1: So it just happens to be the case, right, How
Speaker 1: is it that Klaus is always so right? Right? I
Speaker 1: mean he just happens to know, right that there's going
Speaker 1: to be something like the kof coming. He just happens
Speaker 1: to know that cyber polygon, right, there will be all
Speaker 1: of these attacks on the in structure from a cyber
Speaker 1: vantage point. He just happens to know that there's going
Speaker 1: to be alien disclosure. Or do these people know because
Speaker 1: they're in on planning it? What's more rational? What's more
Speaker 1: likely in that scenario? Well, obviously that they're part of
Speaker 1: planning it. Duh, it's a no brainer. And so how
Speaker 1: does this fit into this narrative? What's the point of this? Well,
Speaker 1: remember that the guiding strategy that they continually reuse and
Speaker 1: just recycle, rinse, repeat is problem reaction solution. Right, We've
Speaker 1: all heard this. But what does that mean? Well, it
Speaker 1: just means controlled chaos, right, It means managing chaos, right,
Speaker 1: and steering the chaos in the way that the elite
Speaker 1: wanted to go, and that could involve them actually starting
Speaker 1: the chaos in the case of false flags, or it
Speaker 1: might be a situation where something organically happens and then
Speaker 1: they co opt and steer it. Right. On a smaller scale, right,
Speaker 1: you could look at co intel operations or black ops
Speaker 1: where you have like a McVeigh type of situation or
Speaker 1: a grip that's co opted and steered by informants and
Speaker 1: honeypots and all that. That's a smaller scale version of
Speaker 1: controlled and managed chaos, right where they come in and
Speaker 1: solve and save the day or whatever, the Feds and whatnot. Well,
Speaker 1: this is a bigger scale of that where we go
Speaker 1: back to the fifties, sixties and seventies and the alien narrative.
Speaker 1: The alien myth was humans are the problem. We've got
Speaker 1: a global crisis. There's no way to fix this without
Speaker 1: a global solution. Remember the famous Reagan speech at the
Speaker 1: United Nations, I think back in the eighties, right, was
Speaker 1: if we just had a global government, or if we
Speaker 1: just had a global crisis, right, and he says, perhaps
Speaker 1: a space based crisis of aliens, perhaps an alien extra
Speaker 1: planetary threat could bring the world together under a global
Speaker 1: United Nations government. Look up the famous ring and speech
Speaker 1: at the UN where he says that alien life could
Speaker 1: serve that purpose. So we know that's one of the cards, right,
Speaker 1: like the Illuminati card deck, that could be played. The
Speaker 1: alien disclosure discovery narrative could be played. In my view,
Speaker 1: perhaps that's why they set SETI up. You know what
Speaker 1: SETI is, right? It was popular in all these eighties
Speaker 1: and nineties, you know sci fi movies. Go watch Contact
Speaker 1: and Michael you you got Matthew McConaughey, he's out there SETI. Right,
Speaker 1: he's just trying to hit on, get him a little
Speaker 1: page of Jodie Faster while Jodie Faster shinn An emails.
Speaker 1: Do the Aliens from Schety? Right, So Matthew McConaughey is
Speaker 1: in all these SETI movies, right? What was SETI? Well,
Speaker 1: SETI was just part of the propaganda to let us
Speaker 1: think right that you know the Berner von Braun of
Speaker 1: course talked about this. So this has been in the
Speaker 1: cards for a long time. And SETI could Oh, we
Speaker 1: got a message, SETI got an email? Right, et sent
Speaker 1: SETI an email? Was it say? Oh, it says we're coming.
Speaker 1: And potentially right could be where blue Bean comes into
Speaker 1: play here, Perhaps some advanced version of holographic imagery. We've
Speaker 1: seen a lot of videos going around viral for many
Speaker 1: years of you know, pretty elaborate holograms, right that people
Speaker 1: could be duped into thinking was a Jesus, a Buddha,
Speaker 1: you know whatever, a religious imagery as a second coming
Speaker 1: or something like that. And again that's not out of
Speaker 1: the realm of possibility, given what we did see in
Speaker 1: these previous instances that I listed of the CIA using
Speaker 1: religious imagery and mythology to dupe people during the Cold
Speaker 1: War and even in the present day. Apparitions are a
Speaker 1: great way to dupe people to serve a function stacking, right,
Speaker 1: a magical apparition, right, Yeah, there we have. So Seti's
Speaker 1: going to find some code. Right. Remember in close Encounters, right,
Speaker 1: all the nerds are sitting there at SETI or a
Speaker 1: CIA base or whatever, the NSA or something, and they're oh,
Speaker 1: we got coordinates, so where the aliens are going to land?
Speaker 1: And it has to be over here by the denver
Speaker 1: important Right, Well, no, this is all really just stage managed.
Speaker 1: It's stage planned. It's not a real alien disclosure. It
Speaker 1: should be patently obvious because, by the way, if you
Speaker 1: want a template that they'll probably use, have you read
Speaker 1: child is end Child Is In is the template for
Speaker 1: this very thing. And again, Arthur C. Clark, you didn't
Speaker 1: just write that. He wrote two thousand and one twenty ten.
Speaker 1: By the way, twenty ten is just as important for
Speaker 1: two thousand for the narrative as two thousand and one,
Speaker 1: because in twenty ten the aliens are revealed to be
Speaker 1: these basically advanced AI beings right that shepherd mankind into
Speaker 1: their evolutionary assent to deity. There you go. Everybody should
Speaker 1: watch Rite the If you can't read it, go watch
Speaker 1: the Sci Fi Channel's version of Child is In because
Speaker 1: it's the same pattern. Arthur cy Clark, by the way,
Speaker 1: was hanging out in the circles of Alistair Croley. So
Speaker 1: you can look at Carellen, the demon figure there, who
Speaker 1: literally looks like a demon. I mean, how much more
Speaker 1: obvious could it be? Always got cloven hoofs. I wonder
Speaker 1: what this is supposed to be? I wonder, right? And
Speaker 1: what does he do? He comes and he offers everybody
Speaker 1: global government, He offers medical miracles, He offers a solution
Speaker 1: to the wars and the famines and the pestilences. Right,
Speaker 1: the Alien Salvation narrative, which is a gnostic mythological narrative.
Speaker 1: But do you know how spoiler alert Childhood's end ends. Well,
Speaker 1: he does the same same thing that Starchild does in
Speaker 1: the original story of two thousand and one. Oh sorry,
Speaker 1: but in order to save you, we're gonna have to
Speaker 1: take your generation of children on our spaceship, and we're
Speaker 1: gonna have to nuke the rest of you. So Earth
Speaker 1: gets nuked, just like in two thousand and one, Earth
Speaker 1: is supposed to be nuked. A demon comes to save humanity,
Speaker 1: to nuke Earth, to save us again, the aliens are
Speaker 1: always doing what the global elite are doing. Why are
Speaker 1: the aliens always Malthusiam, It just happens to be the
Speaker 1: case that the aliens are, you know, maltheusing. It just
Speaker 1: happens to be the case of their Oh, it just
Speaker 1: happens to be the case of their demons, and that
Speaker 1: they say the same things demons say, right, Oh, kill
Speaker 1: everybody for us and we'll give you a utopia, right
Speaker 1: wink wink. I mean, it's so obviously bloney, it's so
Speaker 1: obviously propaganda, and it is so obviously demonic. And so
Speaker 1: that's how this narrative, this fake story fits into the
Speaker 1: mythos of the great reset is that it's exact exactly
Speaker 1: the religious pattern of the things that Klaus the global
Speaker 1: elites push. Mankind is the problem. Man has to be
Speaker 1: put to death because he is a resource vampire. He's
Speaker 1: sucking up all the resources. He's you know, harming the
Speaker 1: planet through climate right through his exhalations of carbon dioxide,
Speaker 1: and carbon dioxide is a toxin, none of which is true,
Speaker 1: by the way, and so it's all