WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Financial use cases that touch our day to day life.

2
00:00:04.120 --> 00:00:06.719
<v Speaker 1>They need to connect with the treade file stack right,

3
00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:09.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think this connection between DeFi and treade file

4
00:00:10.320 --> 00:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is clumsy, it's difficult, it is opaque and is prone

5
00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to risk. So I think that the first the first aspect,

6
00:00:19.640 --> 00:00:22.039
<v Speaker 1>I think the first evolution that will be required is

7
00:00:22.079 --> 00:00:24.839
<v Speaker 1>for more stuff to come natively on chain. So we

8
00:00:24.879 --> 00:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of securities to organized so called, a

9
00:00:29.039 --> 00:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of things natively coming on a on a on

10
00:00:32.399 --> 00:00:35.799
<v Speaker 1>crypto stack. So I think the define needs to expand

11
00:00:35.799 --> 00:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because otherwise we are just like patching

12
00:00:39.439 --> 00:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>different technologies at the same time and this create risk.

13
00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>This content is brought to you by v chain, which

14
00:00:51.280 --> 00:00:55.439
<v Speaker 2>is a leading enterprise grade Layer one public blockchain spearheading

15
00:00:55.560 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a digital revolution from a sustainable, highly scalable smart contract platform.

16
00:01:00.520 --> 00:01:04.079
<v Speaker 2>The v chain blockchain has many unique features, which makes

17
00:01:04.120 --> 00:01:07.719
<v Speaker 2>it an ideal choice for Web three applications. V chain

18
00:01:07.840 --> 00:01:12.599
<v Speaker 2>is working with many great enterprises such as PWCGVONCI, BMW

19
00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:16.239
<v Speaker 2>and Walmart China. Most recently, they partnered with the Boston

20
00:01:16.319 --> 00:01:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Consulting Group to build a revolutionary decentralized application ecosystem. I'm

21
00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a big believer in this project. I have been since

22
00:01:25.239 --> 00:01:28.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen. I've been a VET token holder for years

23
00:01:28.400 --> 00:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and this blockchain is highly scalable, great with security and speed,

24
00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:36.359
<v Speaker 2>and it has low energy consumption. If you'd like to

25
00:01:36.439 --> 00:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>learn more about v chain, please visit vchain dot org.

26
00:01:39.959 --> 00:01:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Link will be in a description. Welcome to the Thinking

27
00:01:42.760 --> 00:01:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Crypto Podcast. I'm your host, Tony Edward. With me today

28
00:01:45.760 --> 00:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>is Luca Prospery, who is the CEO and co founder

29
00:01:49.280 --> 00:01:52.319
<v Speaker 2>of m zero Labs. Luca, great to have you on.

30
00:01:52.799 --> 00:01:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me Tony, Luca.

31
00:01:55.560 --> 00:01:58.319
<v Speaker 2>As stated before the recording, I'm excited to learn about

32
00:01:58.480 --> 00:02:01.879
<v Speaker 2>m zero you guys. Recently ran is an incredible of

33
00:02:01.959 --> 00:02:05.480
<v Speaker 2>funding round which was led by being Capital Crypto. But

34
00:02:05.560 --> 00:02:07.599
<v Speaker 2>let's start with your background. Where are you from and

35
00:02:07.640 --> 00:02:09.039
<v Speaker 2>what's your professional background?

36
00:02:09.560 --> 00:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Technically from Italy, although I haven't lived in Italy for

37
00:02:12.919 --> 00:02:16.039
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, I actually spent most of my

38
00:02:16.919 --> 00:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>adult career in London. I'm a mathematician by background. I

39
00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:27.439
<v Speaker 1>spent fifteen years more than fifteen years in traditional finance

40
00:02:28.840 --> 00:02:33.199
<v Speaker 1>as an advisor, investment banker, or investors in financial institutions

41
00:02:34.159 --> 00:02:37.759
<v Speaker 1>before deciding that DeFi was too interesting for me. To

42
00:02:37.800 --> 00:02:40.599
<v Speaker 1>stay out of it during COVID, and then I decided

43
00:02:40.639 --> 00:02:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to leave what I was doing before and join the

44
00:02:46.759 --> 00:02:49.159
<v Speaker 1>DeFi revolution. I mean, we can go as deep as

45
00:02:49.159 --> 00:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you want there. But I spent the first couple of

46
00:02:51.759 --> 00:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>years being actively participating to some of the largest protocols INFI,

47
00:02:56.360 --> 00:03:02.039
<v Speaker 1>most notably maker Out, advising some funds, investing in the space,

48
00:03:02.080 --> 00:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and publishing my own research under a sub stack called

49
00:03:05.680 --> 00:03:07.439
<v Speaker 1>dirt Roads that started as.

50
00:03:07.360 --> 00:03:08.919
<v Speaker 3>A game and became something more.

51
00:03:09.759 --> 00:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Then we decided to join forces with my two co founders,

52
00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Oliver and Gregg, and found and zero at the very

53
00:03:15.319 --> 00:03:16.199
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty twenty two.

54
00:03:17.280 --> 00:03:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Now you mentioned, you know, being in a treadfy historically

55
00:03:21.960 --> 00:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>and an advisor to companies and funds. What was your

56
00:03:25.560 --> 00:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>first encounter with crypto? Was it a DeFi protocol or

57
00:03:29.639 --> 00:03:31.960
<v Speaker 2>was it bitcoin? And you know where did it click

58
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:32.199
<v Speaker 2>for you?

59
00:03:33.159 --> 00:03:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

60
00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>For me, it was not Bigcoin. For me, it was DEFY. Indeed,

61
00:03:37.319 --> 00:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason is that I have been deeply involved in

62
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:45.599
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions for fifteen years, right, And you know, sometimes

63
00:03:45.639 --> 00:03:49.039
<v Speaker 1>there is this conception of I don't know a banker

64
00:03:49.639 --> 00:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that knows who knows banking. Actually bankers are service providers

65
00:03:55.159 --> 00:03:56.919
<v Speaker 1>or investors or service providers.

66
00:03:56.919 --> 00:03:58.319
<v Speaker 3>They know the industry they operate.

67
00:03:58.400 --> 00:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And I used to be a banker for bankers, So

68
00:04:01.400 --> 00:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I used to be a financial institution specialist at Morgan Stanley,

69
00:04:06.120 --> 00:04:08.039
<v Speaker 1>so one of the largest investment banks in the world,

70
00:04:08.479 --> 00:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and I used to invest in banks and financial institutions,

71
00:04:11.560 --> 00:04:16.759
<v Speaker 1>so I knew deeply how money is created, distributed, and

72
00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>how actually financial intermediation works most people, most people ignore it.

73
00:04:21.519 --> 00:04:24.439
<v Speaker 1>But I stayed out of the so called fintech revolution

74
00:04:25.120 --> 00:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>because for me, it was a very interesting front end,

75
00:04:27.920 --> 00:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say, innovation, but the back end of financial institutions

76
00:04:31.040 --> 00:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>world was always the same, like you know, the way

77
00:04:32.720 --> 00:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we we create money, we move it, we store it,

78
00:04:35.839 --> 00:04:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the way we the way we like we recognize value,

79
00:04:39.000 --> 00:04:43.319
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. So when I started looking at DeFi protocols,

80
00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this was in the beginning of the DeFi summer. For me,

81
00:04:46.800 --> 00:04:49.079
<v Speaker 1>it was like an Euroca moment in the sense that

82
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I realized that for the first time, maybe even unconsciously,

83
00:04:53.240 --> 00:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>there were teams that were trying to reinvent the way

84
00:04:56.199 --> 00:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>actually we create money in the first place. So there

85
00:04:59.720 --> 00:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>were actually innovating the back end of financial institutions, which

86
00:05:03.279 --> 00:05:06.199
<v Speaker 1>is very philosophical in nature, so that's why I got fascinated.

87
00:05:06.279 --> 00:05:09.879
<v Speaker 1>So for me to click, the real clique was maker

88
00:05:09.959 --> 00:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>out I started. I don't even remember how I got

89
00:05:13.279 --> 00:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in touch with the guys at the first place, but

90
00:05:14.879 --> 00:05:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it was very quick down the rabbit hole time kind

91
00:05:17.439 --> 00:05:18.199
<v Speaker 1>of process.

92
00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:22.519
<v Speaker 2>Wow. And does it surprise you that many of these

93
00:05:22.600 --> 00:05:25.759
<v Speaker 2>firms like Morgan Stanley, black Rock and so forth are

94
00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:30.519
<v Speaker 2>now participating with ETFs pick one ETFs, Many are testing tokenization,

95
00:05:31.319 --> 00:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>some are custodying stable coin reserves. I think black Rock

96
00:05:34.639 --> 00:05:38.959
<v Speaker 2>custodies circled USDC reserves. Do you feel this is inevitable

97
00:05:39.040 --> 00:05:44.199
<v Speaker 2>they all have to capitulate to this technology.

98
00:05:44.279 --> 00:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes and no, in a sense that it doesn't surprise

99
00:05:47.800 --> 00:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>me that very sophisticated and diversified financial institutions like the

100
00:05:53.480 --> 00:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>large investment banks for USET managers like black CROC are.

101
00:05:57.680 --> 00:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Active because the guys are very small.

102
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They want to be at the forefront of innovation and

103
00:06:02.160 --> 00:06:05.879
<v Speaker 1>they want to service an industry that emerges. The ATF,

104
00:06:05.879 --> 00:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think is a separate story. I think there is

105
00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>market demand and they want to be on top of

106
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the flows. At the same time, not everyone is the same,

107
00:06:14.920 --> 00:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>so on the other side, we see a lot of

108
00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:23.639
<v Speaker 1>resistance from traditional commercial banks about proper innovation in DeFi

109
00:06:24.120 --> 00:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because I really want to protect their business right and

110
00:06:26.600 --> 00:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think crypto is threatening the financial institution's business and

111
00:06:32.040 --> 00:06:36.759
<v Speaker 1>will keep threatening it. So in my opinion, the most

112
00:06:36.839 --> 00:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>innovative and smart institutions will adopt this revolution and thrive

113
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and transform themselves. The least innovative will not, and I

114
00:06:46.480 --> 00:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>think they will they will go back. They will just

115
00:06:49.519 --> 00:06:52.959
<v Speaker 1>shrink with time. So it's interesting now to see the

116
00:06:53.279 --> 00:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>smart and most innovative ones get very active and the

117
00:06:55.720 --> 00:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>others one get very resistant at the same time.

118
00:06:58.480 --> 00:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now, question on DeFi, because I'm a big believer

119
00:07:02.519 --> 00:07:06.319
<v Speaker 2>in DeFi believe it's the future. However, we've often seen

120
00:07:06.360 --> 00:07:09.839
<v Speaker 2>with technology version one point zero is you know, nowhere

121
00:07:09.839 --> 00:07:12.639
<v Speaker 2>close to being perfect, and there's usually a lot of flaws,

122
00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and we've seen a lot of exploits around DeFi. Where

123
00:07:16.519 --> 00:07:19.279
<v Speaker 2>do you think or how do you think the industry

124
00:07:19.319 --> 00:07:21.920
<v Speaker 2>goes from one point oh to two point to avoid

125
00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:24.079
<v Speaker 2>these exploits in these things, I.

126
00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Think a couple of I think a couple of ways.

127
00:07:28.399 --> 00:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>First of all, DeFi currently.

128
00:07:32.439 --> 00:07:33.199
<v Speaker 3>In order to.

129
00:07:33.279 --> 00:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Absorb most of the financial use cases that touch our

130
00:07:38.360 --> 00:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>day to day life. They need to connect with the

131
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:44.279
<v Speaker 1>treade file stuck right, And I think this connection between

132
00:07:44.279 --> 00:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>DeFi and trade file is clumsy, is difficult, it is

133
00:07:48.480 --> 00:07:53.519
<v Speaker 1>opaque and is prone to risk. So I think that

134
00:07:53.720 --> 00:07:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the first the first aspect, I think the first evolution

135
00:07:56.560 --> 00:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that will be required is for more stuff to come

136
00:07:59.240 --> 00:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>natively on. So we see a lot a lot of

137
00:08:01.600 --> 00:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>securities organized so called, a lot of things natively coming

138
00:08:06.439 --> 00:08:10.199
<v Speaker 1>on a on on crypto stack. So I think the

139
00:08:10.199 --> 00:08:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the finance to expand a little bit because otherwise we

140
00:08:13.920 --> 00:08:16.759
<v Speaker 1>are just like patching different technologies at the same time

141
00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:20.839
<v Speaker 1>and this create risk. And the second point is I

142
00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>think the early early builders in defire, we're dejons, we're innovators,

143
00:08:26.759 --> 00:08:32.039
<v Speaker 1>were disruptors. This is great, but obviously some sort of

144
00:08:32.080 --> 00:08:35.879
<v Speaker 1>institutionalization and professializational services is going to benefit everyone. And

145
00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:37.799
<v Speaker 1>we have seen it also in tach right in Web two.

146
00:08:38.480 --> 00:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Google now is not a startup. Google is the largest

147
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is the largest company in the world or something like that,

148
00:08:44.240 --> 00:08:46.879
<v Speaker 1>so they have very standardized processes, a way to do stuff.

149
00:08:46.919 --> 00:08:49.639
<v Speaker 1>So I think we are professionalizing ourselves as an industry

150
00:08:49.679 --> 00:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as well.

151
00:08:50.559 --> 00:08:54.039
<v Speaker 2>M Yeah, great points. So let's talk about M zero,

152
00:08:54.279 --> 00:08:57.200
<v Speaker 2>tell us about M zero, how it came about, and

153
00:08:57.600 --> 00:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>what's the mission.

154
00:08:59.320 --> 00:09:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's connected to what you were saying before.

155
00:09:03.120 --> 00:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>When us as founders.

156
00:09:08.080 --> 00:09:12.919
<v Speaker 1>We we got like we fell in love with the

157
00:09:13.000 --> 00:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>maker now construct and mission. You know, Maker it out

158
00:09:16.200 --> 00:09:18.919
<v Speaker 1>was an early For those who are not too familiar,

159
00:09:19.639 --> 00:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's still like a very big defa protocol, but it

160
00:09:22.159 --> 00:09:24.399
<v Speaker 1>was an early protocol that was trying to innovate the

161
00:09:24.399 --> 00:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>way you create money. So instead of creating money, I

162
00:09:28.200 --> 00:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get to nerd your money creation. But

163
00:09:30.799 --> 00:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world, banks create money out of thin air.

164
00:09:33.799 --> 00:09:35.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they're giving you money that is someone

165
00:09:35.639 --> 00:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>else's now. In the case of maker ow, they had

166
00:09:38.679 --> 00:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>this system decentralized and permission less to create fungible money

167
00:09:44.720 --> 00:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>by pledging certain.

168
00:09:49.759 --> 00:09:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Digital assets.

169
00:09:51.000 --> 00:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So we thought that that was a very very powerful

170
00:09:53.039 --> 00:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>construct and within the DOW we tried to expand it

171
00:09:57.080 --> 00:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and to integrate it with the traditional financial world. And

172
00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:03.519
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Black Crock, but you know, we we spoke

173
00:10:03.600 --> 00:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the days with many financial institutions Black Crock,

174
00:10:07.159 --> 00:10:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Pin Costs, Sociotationeral, and a few others. They wanted to

175
00:10:10.279 --> 00:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>connect to the protocol and they were trying, but it

176
00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:17.639
<v Speaker 1>was very difficult. So I think that we we took

177
00:10:17.679 --> 00:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>those lessons and we decided to actually recreate a new

178
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>protocol that would learn from those lessons, but without certain

179
00:10:25.399 --> 00:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>flows in governance, in retail participation that we thought were

180
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>detrimental for the protocol to scale. And at the same

181
00:10:33.399 --> 00:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>time spend a lot of time thinking about the integration

182
00:10:37.279 --> 00:10:41.279
<v Speaker 1>with the thread five and and and the protocol, and

183
00:10:41.360 --> 00:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what we want to do is very ambitious. I mean,

184
00:10:43.200 --> 00:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we want to create a protocol that the

185
00:10:46.480 --> 00:10:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the elevators. The Elevators pitch is a protocol that empowers

186
00:10:53.759 --> 00:10:57.519
<v Speaker 1>a federation of minters, so any any approved institution can

187
00:10:57.559 --> 00:11:01.919
<v Speaker 1>come and bring and print to fully fangible stable coin

188
00:11:02.080 --> 00:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that is hyper transparent and it's fully fangible across the network.

189
00:11:07.080 --> 00:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>The real ambition is bypass completely banking institutions and issuers

190
00:11:13.519 --> 00:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from money generation. So instead of having a system with

191
00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>central banks and commercial banks just like taking a lot

192
00:11:23.080 --> 00:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of risk but also participating in distributing money, et cetera,

193
00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:28.879
<v Speaker 1>we would like to have a protocol like m zero

194
00:11:28.919 --> 00:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>at the center of everything, enforcing full transparency innovation so

195
00:11:34.600 --> 00:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that money actually can be generated and used in fully

196
00:11:37.360 --> 00:11:42.879
<v Speaker 1>fangible way without depending on the legacy legacy stack. So

197
00:11:42.919 --> 00:11:46.759
<v Speaker 1>it's very very very ambitious and long term project.

198
00:11:47.840 --> 00:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>So it's all us about the protocol of the blockchain.

199
00:11:50.559 --> 00:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Is obvious there's different protocols out there, proof of history,

200
00:11:53.399 --> 00:11:56.399
<v Speaker 2>proof of stake and so forth. What protocol does the

201
00:11:57.080 --> 00:11:58.320
<v Speaker 2>M zero blockchain use?

202
00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So M zero is currently deployed on may not. So

203
00:12:03.840 --> 00:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is on ethereum may not. So that uses obviously the

204
00:12:08.840 --> 00:12:16.519
<v Speaker 1>standard consensus consensus approach of ethereum. But this is the

205
00:12:16.879 --> 00:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>engine we think the stable coin for a lack of

206
00:12:20.200 --> 00:12:24.279
<v Speaker 1>a better term, that will be generated by interacting with

207
00:12:24.399 --> 00:12:28.039
<v Speaker 1>M zero will exist on every chain. And how we

208
00:12:28.080 --> 00:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>are actually taking care of this portability is something that

209
00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:32.799
<v Speaker 1>we're working on now.

210
00:12:33.799 --> 00:12:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

211
00:12:34.519 --> 00:12:36.799
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the M token. Tell us about that

212
00:12:36.879 --> 00:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and the tokenomics.

213
00:12:38.919 --> 00:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so actually we have three tokens. We like to

214
00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be to do things complicated apart from the jokes and

215
00:12:49.039 --> 00:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like we if you look at the M zero,

216
00:12:51.519 --> 00:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the M zero logo, it's M

217
00:12:54.000 --> 00:12:57.799
<v Speaker 1>a power, a power symbol and zero. There are reasons

218
00:12:57.840 --> 00:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>why we M zero is called en of course. The

219
00:13:02.600 --> 00:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>nerdier one is empower anything power zero is always one,

220
00:13:06.519 --> 00:13:10.519
<v Speaker 1>so there is a lot of stability within the logo itself.

221
00:13:11.120 --> 00:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So we actually have an empower, an MP token, a

222
00:13:13.240 --> 00:13:15.919
<v Speaker 1>power token, and a zero tok Now the M token

223
00:13:16.039 --> 00:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is what we what people in this space called a

224
00:13:18.399 --> 00:13:20.879
<v Speaker 1>stable coin. So the M token is a token that

225
00:13:20.960 --> 00:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>represents a claim on the underlying collateral and is should

226
00:13:28.600 --> 00:13:31.799
<v Speaker 1>be because before because the market forces softly packed to

227
00:13:31.840 --> 00:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. So for the use for the user, uh,

228
00:13:36.159 --> 00:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the experience shouldn't be different from using a us DC

229
00:13:39.720 --> 00:13:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and U S d T. We just think is a

230
00:13:41.679 --> 00:13:47.879
<v Speaker 1>better better design in terms of transparency, in terms of resilience,

231
00:13:48.480 --> 00:13:52.919
<v Speaker 1>in terms of ill portability. If within the stack, I think, uh,

232
00:13:53.200 --> 00:13:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the MP token is not ill bearing itself, but can

233
00:13:55.960 --> 00:14:00.519
<v Speaker 1>bring underlying yield to the to the user venues. So

234
00:14:00.559 --> 00:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the M is some sort of so called stable coin.

235
00:14:03.279 --> 00:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's put it like that. And then the power token

236
00:14:05.879 --> 00:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and the zero token are our governance tokens. So the

237
00:14:09.080 --> 00:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>power token and the zero tokens in jointly they govern

238
00:14:13.399 --> 00:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the protocol, so they allow token holders to take decisions

239
00:14:17.480 --> 00:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>who can come and connect, how to parameterize the protocol,

240
00:14:21.799 --> 00:14:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and how to claim the economics of the protocol. Now

241
00:14:25.320 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we are not a tao in the in the appropriate sense,

242
00:14:28.320 --> 00:14:30.759
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that we don't have a decentralized workforce.

243
00:14:30.799 --> 00:14:32.639
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a treasury that is accrued, but the

244
00:14:32.720 --> 00:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>protoct can be used by the tao. We're just like

245
00:14:37.159 --> 00:14:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a group of parties that take decisions through tokens. But

246
00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:43.039
<v Speaker 1>there is no there is no treasury, there is there

247
00:14:43.080 --> 00:14:48.039
<v Speaker 1>is no underlying workforce. Whatever whatever economic flaw is generated

248
00:14:48.080 --> 00:14:53.039
<v Speaker 1>by the protocol gets distributed out. And these two tokens

249
00:14:53.080 --> 00:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>have a very like a rather sophisticated toconomics, a set

250
00:14:58.399 --> 00:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of sort of in set of emission and set of mechanisms.

251
00:15:02.039 --> 00:15:04.759
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we spent we spent a long part

252
00:15:04.840 --> 00:15:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of our white paper describing those.

253
00:15:07.559 --> 00:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Your core use case seems to be stable coins, a

254
00:15:11.519 --> 00:15:15.879
<v Speaker 2>US dollar backed stable coins. Are there other use cases?

255
00:15:16.759 --> 00:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Could it be central bank digital currencies? Could the central

256
00:15:19.399 --> 00:15:22.720
<v Speaker 2>bank use this for that? And are there other things

257
00:15:22.799 --> 00:15:24.480
<v Speaker 2>like to organization that are possible?

258
00:15:24.799 --> 00:15:27.559
<v Speaker 1>So the central bank digital currency is an interesting question.

259
00:15:27.879 --> 00:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think central banks could use M zero for CBDCs.

260
00:15:33.240 --> 00:15:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I think M zero could use CBDCs or collateral. So

261
00:15:37.320 --> 00:15:41.639
<v Speaker 1>it's that a way around cbdc's most probably would be

262
00:15:42.519 --> 00:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a wholesale instrument, meaning that central banks will use it

263
00:15:47.320 --> 00:15:52.519
<v Speaker 1>interacting with all salors like commercial banks, et cetera. So

264
00:15:52.559 --> 00:15:58.279
<v Speaker 1>we currently the M zero protocol approves only US treasuries

265
00:15:58.279 --> 00:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>as collateral for the meanting of stable coin. Nothing forbids

266
00:16:02.399 --> 00:16:05.799
<v Speaker 1>us to actually approve CBDCs as collateral for the issues

267
00:16:05.879 --> 00:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of several coins because we always think there's going to

268
00:16:08.200 --> 00:16:14.039
<v Speaker 1>be an additional layer for distribution required. So this is

269
00:16:14.080 --> 00:16:17.519
<v Speaker 1>another point in the direction of bypassing the banking sector

270
00:16:17.559 --> 00:16:22.039
<v Speaker 1>in sever ways when it comes to toganization, Yes, I

271
00:16:22.039 --> 00:16:24.039
<v Speaker 1>think it is a very important point. I think our

272
00:16:24.120 --> 00:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>point is that we can we are using our technology

273
00:16:28.159 --> 00:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>stack to mint fully fangible stables from many issuers. We

274
00:16:34.320 --> 00:16:38.759
<v Speaker 1>could evolve these technology stack to allow issuers to create

275
00:16:39.759 --> 00:16:43.919
<v Speaker 1>as the tokens that actually have different collateral and different nature.

276
00:16:44.639 --> 00:16:47.279
<v Speaker 1>So we could actually use the protocol to create some

277
00:16:47.320 --> 00:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of one chain securitization. So toganization platform itself, it

278
00:16:51.120 --> 00:16:54.919
<v Speaker 1>is actually one of the.

279
00:16:53.759 --> 00:16:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Next chapters of our development roadmap.

280
00:16:58.960 --> 00:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But now we're absolutely focused on the stable coin use case,

281
00:17:01.639 --> 00:17:04.319
<v Speaker 1>which we think is a massive is the largest use

282
00:17:04.359 --> 00:17:07.319
<v Speaker 1>case encrypton in the world, and I think has already

283
00:17:07.359 --> 00:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>seen obvious product, market fit, market adoption, and very strong

284
00:17:12.279 --> 00:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>economics by the very few issues that dominate those markets.

285
00:17:15.440 --> 00:17:15.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

286
00:17:15.799 --> 00:17:19.039
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Now, maybe you can do a mock scenario. Let's

287
00:17:19.039 --> 00:17:22.200
<v Speaker 2>say Morgan Stanley, right, they want to issue a stable

288
00:17:22.279 --> 00:17:25.279
<v Speaker 2>coin and do it and do it. Let's say on

289
00:17:25.400 --> 00:17:28.160
<v Speaker 2>M zero, how would they go about doing that? And

290
00:17:28.200 --> 00:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>once they issued that stable coin, what could it then?

291
00:17:31.599 --> 00:17:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Could they then use that stable coin to do lend

292
00:17:34.240 --> 00:17:39.079
<v Speaker 2>it out, move it off onto another chain. You tell

293
00:17:39.160 --> 00:17:41.440
<v Speaker 2>us about the different things an issuer can do.

294
00:17:42.640 --> 00:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that it's supply and demand. I think

295
00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the use of a stable coin is always the same.

296
00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you use stable coins, you use money to store value,

297
00:17:54.039 --> 00:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to transact, to settle.

298
00:17:56.119 --> 00:17:56.839
<v Speaker 3>To do everything.

299
00:17:57.440 --> 00:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Now, producing money is very profit doble like because what

300
00:18:03.079 --> 00:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you are actually what you're.

301
00:18:05.559 --> 00:18:07.559
<v Speaker 3>Actually doing when you produce money is.

302
00:18:09.599 --> 00:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You are, let's say, keeping someone's wealth and paying someone

303
00:18:16.319 --> 00:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>an interest. Like you know, you deposit your money in

304
00:18:18.680 --> 00:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a deposit, in a bank deposit, you get an interest rate,

305
00:18:22.720 --> 00:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you use this money to invest it in

306
00:18:25.000 --> 00:18:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the back end on certain assets. And typically the money

307
00:18:29.359 --> 00:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you pay to the depositors is way less than the

308
00:18:31.759 --> 00:18:34.079
<v Speaker 1>yield you get from the assets, and you benefit from

309
00:18:34.079 --> 00:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this spread, so public printing money is a very profitable business.

310
00:18:40.640 --> 00:18:43.599
<v Speaker 1>The issue is that this system works if there is

311
00:18:43.640 --> 00:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of demand for your money, so there has

312
00:18:46.440 --> 00:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to be used for your money.

313
00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:50.480
<v Speaker 3>And this is where this is why.

314
00:18:50.319 --> 00:18:52.519
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing the domination of very few parties in the

315
00:18:52.519 --> 00:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>stable coin because if you want to use a stable coin,

316
00:18:54.759 --> 00:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the stable coin needs to be liquid, otherwise it is unusable.

317
00:18:58.519 --> 00:19:01.079
<v Speaker 1>And currently the only true liquid stable coin in the

318
00:19:01.079 --> 00:19:04.519
<v Speaker 1>crypto space is Tethered. It might not be a great

319
00:19:04.559 --> 00:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>stable coin in the way it is designed, but it's

320
00:19:07.720 --> 00:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>super liquid and in omnipresence, so people really use it,

321
00:19:11.440 --> 00:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>at least the people that are in crypto today. Now,

322
00:19:13.759 --> 00:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>whether this is good enough for the future of crypto,

323
00:19:16.400 --> 00:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not for me to tell. I have opinions, of course,

324
00:19:18.680 --> 00:19:23.319
<v Speaker 1>but it's not for me to tell now. So let's

325
00:19:23.359 --> 00:19:26.759
<v Speaker 1>say that everyone wants to print a stable coin. The

326
00:19:26.799 --> 00:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>reason why it's difficult for everyone to go their own

327
00:19:32.200 --> 00:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>way is because you imagine, if you have ten twenty

328
00:19:35.599 --> 00:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty stable coins, you are fractionalizing late the liquidity. And

329
00:19:39.200 --> 00:19:41.319
<v Speaker 1>if you fractionalize the liquidity, there is not a real

330
00:19:41.440 --> 00:19:44.519
<v Speaker 1>use for stable coin. If there's not a real market

331
00:19:44.559 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 1>for your stable coins. Who are you're selling your stable

332
00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>coin into. So the fact that many institutions are thinking

333
00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:54.319
<v Speaker 1>about issuing a stable coin, we think is not a

334
00:19:54.400 --> 00:19:57.519
<v Speaker 1>viable solution. It's just like a race to the bottom.

335
00:19:57.759 --> 00:20:00.839
<v Speaker 1>So what we're trying to say here is that we

336
00:20:00.920 --> 00:20:04.799
<v Speaker 1>are like the call to action would be for institutions

337
00:20:04.880 --> 00:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like Morgan Stanley, like large market makers, like some of

338
00:20:07.759 --> 00:20:10.039
<v Speaker 1>the market makers in our cap table, the Winter Mutes,

339
00:20:10.039 --> 00:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the Galaxies, the gsrs of this world is guys you

340
00:20:14.279 --> 00:20:16.759
<v Speaker 1>think is very profitable to actually enter in the stable

341
00:20:16.759 --> 00:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>coin business. So set yourselves up in a way to

342
00:20:21.279 --> 00:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>be compliant with the M zero requirements, and you all

343
00:20:24.160 --> 00:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>together meant the same stable coin. So you kind of

344
00:20:27.160 --> 00:20:29.559
<v Speaker 1>help each other by creating something that is bigger and

345
00:20:29.599 --> 00:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's more liquid and can grow and benefit everyone so

346
00:20:33.359 --> 00:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>stronger together kind of approach. In order to do that,

347
00:20:38.480 --> 00:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we are now launching our first issue of stable on

348
00:20:42.480 --> 00:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the network that we are booth strapping. We are publishing

349
00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:49.759
<v Speaker 1>guidelines on how those issues issues should be set up

350
00:20:49.839 --> 00:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in order to be hyper safe. For this for the

351
00:20:53.400 --> 00:20:57.799
<v Speaker 1>backing of the stable, we will we will open source

352
00:20:57.839 --> 00:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>these standards to the institutions want to connect, and we

353
00:21:00.920 --> 00:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>will help those institutions to set themselves up to connect.

354
00:21:04.359 --> 00:21:06.799
<v Speaker 1>So as soon as they have a good connector, which

355
00:21:06.880 --> 00:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>is some combination of legal structure and tact, they can

356
00:21:10.200 --> 00:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>actually part collateral meant the stable the same stable if

357
00:21:15.519 --> 00:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they want, and use it in the network for everything.

358
00:21:20.200 --> 00:21:24.759
<v Speaker 1>So that we really want to empower the Stronger Together mantra,

359
00:21:24.880 --> 00:21:27.799
<v Speaker 1>not only for the institutions, but also for other stable

360
00:21:27.880 --> 00:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>coin projects instead of going the wrong way and not

361
00:21:31.319 --> 00:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone has the benefit of as the luxury of having

362
00:21:34.039 --> 00:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>raised the amount of mind with it just to come

363
00:21:36.440 --> 00:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and participate with us Stronger Together.

364
00:21:40.440 --> 00:21:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

365
00:21:40.759 --> 00:21:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And a follow questions to that, how do you

366
00:21:44.079 --> 00:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>verify that the issuer has the reserves? And in context

367
00:21:48.359 --> 00:21:51.440
<v Speaker 2>of you know, there is new stable coin regulations coming

368
00:21:51.480 --> 00:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>in the EU, they're working in the United States, there's

369
00:21:55.039 --> 00:22:00.720
<v Speaker 2>been questions about, you know, our certain stable coins backed appropriately,

370
00:22:01.160 --> 00:22:03.079
<v Speaker 2>So how do you verify they have their reserves?

371
00:22:04.119 --> 00:22:10.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Two elements for the answer.

372
00:22:12.319 --> 00:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The second one is more controversial, but I'll risk it.

373
00:22:15.799 --> 00:22:18.079
<v Speaker 1>The first one is that we have created a system

374
00:22:18.759 --> 00:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>today as a set of cross checks that can allow

375
00:22:26.720 --> 00:22:30.759
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing daily verification that the reserves are there. What

376
00:22:30.920 --> 00:22:37.519
<v Speaker 1>it means is that we are suggesting how the vehicles

377
00:22:37.599 --> 00:22:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that hold the reserves should set up, what are the

378
00:22:43.880 --> 00:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>contractual obligations of the parties that come and interact, how

379
00:22:47.920 --> 00:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they should look like.

380
00:22:49.440 --> 00:22:50.480
<v Speaker 3>We are actually.

381
00:22:52.240 --> 00:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Planning to publish templates of those contracts to make sure

382
00:22:55.440 --> 00:22:58.039
<v Speaker 1>that the contractual set up is as strong as possible,

383
00:22:59.119 --> 00:23:04.519
<v Speaker 1>so that we are piggybacking on law. The second part

384
00:23:04.759 --> 00:23:09.039
<v Speaker 1>is we are empowering a network of so called validators

385
00:23:09.119 --> 00:23:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that have the ability to continuously check those reserves and

386
00:23:12.759 --> 00:23:16.839
<v Speaker 1>publish signatures about what's in those reserves. And those validators

387
00:23:16.880 --> 00:23:20.319
<v Speaker 1>are independent, so that there is an independent check ongoing,

388
00:23:20.920 --> 00:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and the penalty for not having this independent check is

389
00:23:23.559 --> 00:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to be deepermissioned by the protocol. The third aspect is governance, Right,

390
00:23:28.559 --> 00:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we want governance to be always ongoing on top of

391
00:23:31.960 --> 00:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. So I think we have a system

392
00:23:34.359 --> 00:23:38.519
<v Speaker 1>of several cross checks. But also we know that that

393
00:23:38.680 --> 00:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>part will evolve. Right at some point the reserves will

394
00:23:41.000 --> 00:23:43.759
<v Speaker 1>exist directly on chain and we can just purchase them

395
00:23:43.839 --> 00:23:45.079
<v Speaker 1>and put them in a smart contract.

396
00:23:45.079 --> 00:23:47.200
<v Speaker 3>But this is not what happens today now.

397
00:23:47.279 --> 00:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The second part of your question is that I think

398
00:23:49.720 --> 00:23:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that the current m zero construct is not compatible with

399
00:23:53.920 --> 00:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>European regulation or US regulation because the US regulation and

400
00:23:58.839 --> 00:24:02.839
<v Speaker 1>European regulation are not good enough. They are exposing the

401
00:24:02.920 --> 00:24:07.079
<v Speaker 1>regulator the holders to a lot of unnecessary risk. I

402
00:24:07.200 --> 00:24:10.279
<v Speaker 1>make you an example, like you know, if the if

403
00:24:10.440 --> 00:24:13.519
<v Speaker 1>the regulator wouldn't have would have decided not to bail

404
00:24:14.200 --> 00:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Citicon Valley Bank, the circle called USDC holders would have

405
00:24:18.440 --> 00:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>been would have incurred like a massive loss and circle

406
00:24:21.480 --> 00:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>would have been doomed. And I think that when you

407
00:24:25.359 --> 00:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>park money in a bank account, you do it because

408
00:24:28.440 --> 00:24:30.519
<v Speaker 1>you want to use your money, not because you want

409
00:24:30.559 --> 00:24:34.599
<v Speaker 1>to provide an unsecured loan to a bank. I think

410
00:24:34.720 --> 00:24:38.519
<v Speaker 1>that there are other regulators that are more forward looking

411
00:24:39.920 --> 00:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in how to actually store the reserves, like Singapore, like Dubai,

412
00:24:46.000 --> 00:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like I think, I think New York as well. But

413
00:24:50.799 --> 00:24:53.839
<v Speaker 1>telling someone that you need to back a stable coin

414
00:24:54.039 --> 00:24:56.279
<v Speaker 1>with the posits that are sitting in a bank is

415
00:24:56.400 --> 00:24:59.559
<v Speaker 1>not synonymous of risk free. It means that you are

416
00:24:59.640 --> 00:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the risk of the bank, and the risk of

417
00:25:02.279 --> 00:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the bank is unsecured. If the bank goes down and

418
00:25:05.519 --> 00:25:07.839
<v Speaker 1>you have more than one hundred thousand dollars in an account,

419
00:25:07.920 --> 00:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>which any stable cord issuer has you are incurring losses

420
00:25:13.319 --> 00:25:16.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's not too safe, so it's as safe as

421
00:25:16.720 --> 00:25:19.039
<v Speaker 1>the So I think that we are spending a lot

422
00:25:19.119 --> 00:25:21.519
<v Speaker 1>of time, as you can imagine, in trying to make

423
00:25:21.599 --> 00:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>sure that the collateral backing, collateral storage, and reserve transparency

424
00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:30.559
<v Speaker 1>is as pristine as possible, because this is very, very

425
00:25:30.599 --> 00:25:31.319
<v Speaker 1>important for US.

426
00:25:32.319 --> 00:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

427
00:25:32.519 --> 00:25:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I did have a question about there seems to

428
00:25:36.000 --> 00:25:40.240
<v Speaker 2>be more demand and this is probably because the US

429
00:25:40.319 --> 00:25:43.079
<v Speaker 2>dollar is the world reserve currency, but for US backstable

430
00:25:43.119 --> 00:25:47.039
<v Speaker 2>coins versus euroback stable coins or any other VR currency.

431
00:25:47.640 --> 00:25:49.559
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you're seeing and is that why you're

432
00:25:49.640 --> 00:25:52.680
<v Speaker 2>primarily focused on US back that people around the world

433
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:56.119
<v Speaker 2>they want the US dollar because it has that store value,

434
00:25:56.240 --> 00:25:57.640
<v Speaker 2>it is the well reserve currency.

435
00:25:58.920 --> 00:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely, I would say US packed rather than US backed,

436
00:26:03.079 --> 00:26:09.279
<v Speaker 1>but yes, absolutely, we are convinced that today the reserve

437
00:26:09.359 --> 00:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>currency of the world is a dollar and cryptoi is

438
00:26:13.839 --> 00:26:19.039
<v Speaker 1>by definition global, so they will adopt the reserve country

439
00:26:19.279 --> 00:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency of the world. At the same time, we

440
00:26:22.200 --> 00:26:25.039
<v Speaker 1>think this can evolve. The reason why we called the

441
00:26:25.119 --> 00:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>stable coin m A not M dollar or m USD

442
00:26:29.160 --> 00:26:31.799
<v Speaker 1>or something like that is because we think that this

443
00:26:32.039 --> 00:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>pegging might actually change it might become a basket of currencies,

444
00:26:36.039 --> 00:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it might become some sort of combination of digital assets.

445
00:26:39.759 --> 00:26:43.319
<v Speaker 3>We don't know. So we think that the.

446
00:26:45.119 --> 00:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Pegging, the reference, the reference currency in the world might

447
00:26:49.319 --> 00:26:52.279
<v Speaker 1>change with time, but we think we live we live

448
00:26:52.319 --> 00:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in a dollarized world and we will live in a

449
00:26:55.039 --> 00:26:56.519
<v Speaker 1>dollarized world for a very long time.

450
00:26:57.559 --> 00:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you brought up a great point about it might

451
00:26:59.759 --> 00:27:03.079
<v Speaker 2>be a basketter currencies in the future as maybe maybe

452
00:27:03.400 --> 00:27:08.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, these different countries launch their CBDCs. Maybe because

453
00:27:08.480 --> 00:27:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it's in a digital format, it can be pulled together

454
00:27:12.079 --> 00:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>in a basket.

455
00:27:12.839 --> 00:27:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and then you have.

456
00:27:14.519 --> 00:27:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Like countries like the bricks countries are coming together and

457
00:27:17.680 --> 00:27:21.119
<v Speaker 2>using alternatives to the US dollar, and that's a whole

458
00:27:21.200 --> 00:27:25.200
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical thing. But they we're seeing signs of possible change.

459
00:27:26.920 --> 00:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely. UH being a reserve currency. Going back to

460
00:27:32.240 --> 00:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the point that printing currency is a very profitable business

461
00:27:35.599 --> 00:27:38.079
<v Speaker 1>because you're it means that you are financed, you can

462
00:27:38.160 --> 00:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>finance yourself at very attractive rates.

463
00:27:42.079 --> 00:27:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

464
00:27:43.319 --> 00:27:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Printing currency is UH is a geopolitical gain. And the US,

465
00:27:48.839 --> 00:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the US, the US dollar wants to protect its space.

466
00:27:53.160 --> 00:27:53.279
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

467
00:27:54.000 --> 00:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>The I mean, I'm sure that other other geopolitical geo

468
00:28:00.039 --> 00:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>political and pillars want to do the same. Like funnily enough,

469
00:28:06.000 --> 00:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that is shared by others in crypto.

470
00:28:08.599 --> 00:28:13.079
<v Speaker 1>I think that stable coins that are packed backed by

471
00:28:13.240 --> 00:28:17.039
<v Speaker 1>treasuries are doing a big favor to the US dollar.

472
00:28:17.440 --> 00:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>They are really empowering the US dollar as a reference

473
00:28:21.559 --> 00:28:23.599
<v Speaker 1>currency on this new monetary stack.

474
00:28:25.319 --> 00:28:27.519
<v Speaker 3>Offshore dollars already exist, you know, there is this.

475
00:28:27.799 --> 00:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Weird concept of euro dollar, which is an offshore dollar

476
00:28:31.160 --> 00:28:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that is printed outside of the banking system, a bit

477
00:28:33.480 --> 00:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like as at back stable coins today, a bit like tether.

478
00:28:37.079 --> 00:28:39.599
<v Speaker 1>This stuff already exists. You know, there are fifteen to

479
00:28:39.680 --> 00:28:43.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty trillion dollars of euro dollars existing. It's just like

480
00:28:43.200 --> 00:28:45.359
<v Speaker 1>it's so weird and so paiked and non standardized that

481
00:28:45.440 --> 00:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people do not really know what it is, so we

482
00:28:48.319 --> 00:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>can actually standardize it. But I think dollar treasury backed

483
00:28:52.279 --> 00:28:55.559
<v Speaker 1>stable coins can do which are dollar packed, can do

484
00:28:55.640 --> 00:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge favor to the US in maintaining their status

485
00:29:01.680 --> 00:29:04.119
<v Speaker 1>as a reference currency of the world.

486
00:29:05.039 --> 00:29:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely, And it was funny because I think just

487
00:29:08.200 --> 00:29:11.599
<v Speaker 2>last week there was a report or an opinion piece

488
00:29:11.720 --> 00:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Wall Street Journal where a former speaker Paul

489
00:29:14.559 --> 00:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Ryan mentioned exactly what you're saying, for the US to

490
00:29:18.400 --> 00:29:22.960
<v Speaker 2>maintain that world reserve currency status, you need to get clarity.

491
00:29:23.079 --> 00:29:23.839
<v Speaker 3>We need to have that.

492
00:29:25.559 --> 00:29:30.319
<v Speaker 2>US backed US treasury back stable coin, and that could

493
00:29:30.400 --> 00:29:34.759
<v Speaker 2>help maintain that status. So these yes, yeah, this is

494
00:29:34.880 --> 00:29:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the dialogue is happening, right, Yeah.

495
00:29:37.759 --> 00:29:39.839
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I think this is you know,

496
00:29:40.960 --> 00:29:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the US, let's say, the regulated US banking system is

497
00:29:45.680 --> 00:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>way smaller than the universe of holders of US treasures,

498
00:29:49.640 --> 00:29:51.799
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of most of US treasurers are sitting

499
00:29:51.839 --> 00:29:54.359
<v Speaker 1>outside of the US, right. The natural buyers are outside

500
00:29:54.359 --> 00:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of the US. So by forcing US dollar pagged stable

501
00:30:01.720 --> 00:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>coins to exist only originate only from the US, we

502
00:30:08.039 --> 00:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are massively limited the space. I think by allowing anyone

503
00:30:13.279 --> 00:30:16.319
<v Speaker 1>in the world to pledge their collateral and mints the

504
00:30:17.039 --> 00:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>usd paged stable coins, we are really expanding this space

505
00:30:20.960 --> 00:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>because the holders of treasuries are way more than the

506
00:30:24.240 --> 00:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>regulated banks we have in the US. Right, most of treasuries,

507
00:30:27.960 --> 00:30:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the stats in my in my in

508
00:30:30.759 --> 00:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>my in my head, but I think I guess that

509
00:30:33.400 --> 00:30:38.359
<v Speaker 1>most of treasure is US treasury are probably sitting in China,

510
00:30:38.480 --> 00:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, or in other countries which are not

511
00:30:41.720 --> 00:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the US, and they want to have some sort of

512
00:30:43.279 --> 00:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>US reserves.

513
00:30:44.599 --> 00:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm. What do you think the stable coin market

514
00:30:49.480 --> 00:30:51.079
<v Speaker 2>looks like in five This is a hard question. It

515
00:30:51.119 --> 00:30:53.720
<v Speaker 2>looks like in five years. You know, let's say we

516
00:30:53.880 --> 00:30:58.279
<v Speaker 2>have different iterations of regulations, we have more DeFi protocols

517
00:30:58.559 --> 00:31:02.160
<v Speaker 2>such as m zero, and you know, you have some

518
00:31:02.200 --> 00:31:05.440
<v Speaker 2>of these big commercial payment companies like Ripples said they're

519
00:31:05.440 --> 00:31:07.319
<v Speaker 2>going to launch a stable coin. Yeah, PayPal has a

520
00:31:07.359 --> 00:31:11.079
<v Speaker 2>stable coin. We talked about Circle and Tether. What do

521
00:31:11.119 --> 00:31:13.559
<v Speaker 2>you think the stable coin market looks like in five years.

522
00:31:15.839 --> 00:31:18.039
<v Speaker 1>That's a very difficult question, obviously, right, because it really

523
00:31:18.079 --> 00:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>depends on how much what would be the next big

524
00:31:22.039 --> 00:31:24.279
<v Speaker 1>use case of crypto. I think the first use case

525
00:31:24.319 --> 00:31:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of crypto was trading, so they needed a trading pair.

526
00:31:28.960 --> 00:31:32.319
<v Speaker 1>That's why Tether was very powerful. Then DeFi came in

527
00:31:32.559 --> 00:31:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and Circle had a pretty strong peg, and so the

528
00:31:36.240 --> 00:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Circle grew. Now we're starting to use to see the

529
00:31:39.319 --> 00:31:43.359
<v Speaker 1>use of stable coins for emittances or in fintech. So

530
00:31:43.599 --> 00:31:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it's really difficult to tell. But in my opinion, in

531
00:31:46.920 --> 00:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ten years, no one would care what is the flavor

532
00:31:51.200 --> 00:31:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and the brand of the stable coin. We will all

533
00:31:53.400 --> 00:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>look at our application that has a dollar amount and

534
00:31:58.160 --> 00:32:00.599
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how actually this dollar amount is.

535
00:32:02.880 --> 00:32:03.319
<v Speaker 3>Created.

536
00:32:04.200 --> 00:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And stable coins will be very powerful back back end stacks,

537
00:32:12.279 --> 00:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so in ten years people will not care and I

538
00:32:14.480 --> 00:32:16.839
<v Speaker 1>think there will be a few big ones. But this

539
00:32:16.960 --> 00:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>market is going to be two trillion dollars, so there

540
00:32:19.240 --> 00:32:23.319
<v Speaker 1>will probably be like ten twenty big players in five years.

541
00:32:23.359 --> 00:32:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there is the risk of having more because

542
00:32:25.359 --> 00:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone will just rush and try to run their own

543
00:32:30.000 --> 00:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think we will still have like sixty seventy

544
00:32:32.720 --> 00:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of the market dominated by very few players and

545
00:32:39.880 --> 00:32:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the rest just like a long tail. So there's gonna

546
00:32:43.839 --> 00:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of activity I think the next four

547
00:32:45.200 --> 00:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>five years, because it's a very interesting space.

548
00:32:48.039 --> 00:32:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

549
00:32:48.720 --> 00:32:53.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm already seeing rumblings and talks of random Wall

550
00:32:53.079 --> 00:32:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Street firms and different folks look into launch stable coins.

551
00:32:56.839 --> 00:33:00.559
<v Speaker 2>So it will see how things pan out. That recently,

552
00:33:00.759 --> 00:33:03.519
<v Speaker 2>you guys had a thirty five million dollar funding round

553
00:33:03.640 --> 00:33:06.079
<v Speaker 2>led by being Capital Crypto. Tell us about that.

554
00:33:07.440 --> 00:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So we have been lucky that to have the

555
00:33:11.559 --> 00:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>belief of amazing investors since the very beginning of our.

556
00:33:18.359 --> 00:33:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Story.

557
00:33:19.319 --> 00:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we raised a twenty two point five million

558
00:33:21.960 --> 00:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar seed at the very beginning of twenty twenty three.

559
00:33:24.640 --> 00:33:29.319
<v Speaker 3>It was led by Pantera. It was already a very

560
00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:30.480
<v Speaker 3>very large seed.

561
00:33:31.839 --> 00:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>In all standards, but then you know, we we have

562
00:33:35.799 --> 00:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>been discussing about very high quality investors since forever, right

563
00:33:41.200 --> 00:33:49.119
<v Speaker 1>so Pain offered like their interest to actually come into

564
00:33:49.160 --> 00:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the cap table at the beginning of the year. We

565
00:33:51.880 --> 00:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>really liked them because I think that they could provide

566
00:33:55.200 --> 00:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they can provide this connectivity with the fintech space that

567
00:33:57.759 --> 00:34:03.359
<v Speaker 1>we were looking for. And then we started conversations and

568
00:34:03.440 --> 00:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that conversations then materialized into a Series eight.

569
00:34:08.079 --> 00:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It was heavily oversubscribed, but it was I think a

570
00:34:10.519 --> 00:34:13.519
<v Speaker 1>very successful Series eight. We know, raising thirty familion dollars.

571
00:34:14.239 --> 00:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that another great success we had was

572
00:34:16.880 --> 00:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not only the participation of being Capital Crypto and our

573
00:34:22.079 --> 00:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>current investors, but also the participation of some of the

574
00:34:24.920 --> 00:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>best strategic players in crypto.

575
00:34:28.119 --> 00:34:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Right.

576
00:34:28.400 --> 00:34:32.599
<v Speaker 1>So, Galaxy Digital is an investor of ours. We intermuwe

577
00:34:32.679 --> 00:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>GSR Caladan SCB ten X, which is the venture fund

578
00:34:38.480 --> 00:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of one of the largest Asian financial institutions. Because our

579
00:34:41.960 --> 00:34:47.079
<v Speaker 1>ambition is really to build an infrastructure for crypto savvy

580
00:34:47.159 --> 00:34:50.599
<v Speaker 1>and crypto friendly institutions to expand their footprint in the industry.

581
00:34:51.039 --> 00:34:53.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have an incredible cap table. I

582
00:34:53.199 --> 00:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>could couldn't be more like, happier or more proud of

583
00:34:57.480 --> 00:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the cap table we put together. Now we need to

584
00:35:00.079 --> 00:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we need to demonstrate the guys they invested the

585
00:35:02.039 --> 00:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>money with the right team HM and.

586
00:35:05.320 --> 00:35:08.519
<v Speaker 2>What's on their roadmap for the remainder of twenty twenty

587
00:35:08.559 --> 00:35:09.199
<v Speaker 2>four for you guys.

588
00:35:11.480 --> 00:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So we launched technically a large part of the stack

589
00:35:17.559 --> 00:35:24.079
<v Speaker 1>on chain in conjunction with the race. So our governance

590
00:35:24.119 --> 00:35:29.559
<v Speaker 1>protocol is on May not our poor protocol is on

591
00:35:29.639 --> 00:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>May at itself, and we will start issuing the first

592
00:35:37.119 --> 00:35:40.039
<v Speaker 1>large chunks of stable coins through the protocol in the

593
00:35:40.039 --> 00:35:43.159
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks and then the next The remainder of

594
00:35:43.199 --> 00:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the year, of the next two years is going to

595
00:35:45.239 --> 00:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be integrations, just like convincing venues that m is a

596
00:35:50.519 --> 00:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>better stable coin to integrate with. So new chains, new

597
00:35:55.000 --> 00:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>DeFi protocols, new lending markets, new exchanges, new large users,

598
00:36:00.880 --> 00:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and on the other side, on the supply side, as

599
00:36:04.880 --> 00:36:08.679
<v Speaker 1>we say, convince issuers or want to be issuers and

600
00:36:08.760 --> 00:36:11.599
<v Speaker 1>projects of stable coins that they should join forces and

601
00:36:11.679 --> 00:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>issue on the mz on network. So I think most

602
00:36:14.880 --> 00:36:18.039
<v Speaker 1>most of Our job in the next twelve months twenty

603
00:36:18.079 --> 00:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>four months is going to be in just educating the market,

604
00:36:23.800 --> 00:36:28.639
<v Speaker 1>learning from the market feedback, and just convincing projects and

605
00:36:28.840 --> 00:36:33.639
<v Speaker 1>issuers and participants and distribution venues to just integrate with us.

606
00:36:34.039 --> 00:36:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So we will spend a lot of time outside of

607
00:36:36.840 --> 00:36:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the company, not necessarily outside. We spent the first eighteen

608
00:36:39.559 --> 00:36:44.519
<v Speaker 1>months of our journey, as always happens, very focused in building.

609
00:36:44.960 --> 00:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Now I think we need to we need to integrate

610
00:36:49.159 --> 00:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>what we built with.

611
00:36:49.880 --> 00:36:50.559
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the world.

612
00:36:51.239 --> 00:36:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. I did want to get your thoughts

613
00:36:54.480 --> 00:36:57.960
<v Speaker 2>on the crypto market at large. Obviously, there's been a

614
00:36:58.039 --> 00:37:01.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of success with the bigcoin et launch, Wall Street

615
00:37:01.880 --> 00:37:05.679
<v Speaker 2>is here, There's been incredible inflows, and just recently the

616
00:37:05.840 --> 00:37:09.400
<v Speaker 2>SEC started to approve the etherorem's body t apps. What

617
00:37:09.480 --> 00:37:11.599
<v Speaker 2>are your thoughts on the et aps and as the

618
00:37:11.760 --> 00:37:12.920
<v Speaker 2>success they've had so far.

619
00:37:16.079 --> 00:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think from a business perspective, let's start from an

620
00:37:22.960 --> 00:37:26.039
<v Speaker 1>innovator's perspective. I think from an innovator's perspective, it is

621
00:37:26.239 --> 00:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>an incredible success story. I think never like unprecedented that

622
00:37:32.199 --> 00:37:38.559
<v Speaker 1>an asset like bitcoin that started started in the cipherpunk

623
00:37:38.719 --> 00:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>cycles and was antagonized by pretty much everyone managed without

624
00:37:44.840 --> 00:37:49.280
<v Speaker 1>any centralized coordination. To go through all the required processes

625
00:37:49.639 --> 00:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and be the backing of one of the largest ETFs

626
00:37:52.880 --> 00:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world is astonishing, And I think this is

627
00:37:56.599 --> 00:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>really an incredible positive story, whatever you believe in or not,

628
00:38:00.639 --> 00:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that a disordered movement can go through the

629
00:38:04.480 --> 00:38:08.679
<v Speaker 1>ranks of Wall Street and take central place. It's it's

630
00:38:08.840 --> 00:38:13.079
<v Speaker 1>just like for a builder and disruptor is spectacular from

631
00:38:13.119 --> 00:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a business perspective. It's also transformational. I mean, like the

632
00:38:17.000 --> 00:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of liquidity that will come in the compartment directly

633
00:38:21.000 --> 00:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>or indirectly through the ETFs is going to be transformational

634
00:38:24.519 --> 00:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>for this space. There's going to be more money for

635
00:38:27.519 --> 00:38:32.639
<v Speaker 1>builders to build, more money flowing through the pipes of

636
00:38:32.840 --> 00:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>crypto and defy requiring also higher standards for builders. And

637
00:38:39.960 --> 00:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>then naturally it will provide more familiarity for users about

638
00:38:45.320 --> 00:38:46.199
<v Speaker 1>what those.

639
00:38:47.639 --> 00:38:48.320
<v Speaker 3>What those.

640
00:38:50.239 --> 00:38:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Those technology stacks can do. And I think on this

641
00:38:52.920 --> 00:38:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the ETHEREOTHF ETF is going to be even more transformational

642
00:38:56.199 --> 00:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>than the bigcoin ETF. I think the big coin use

643
00:38:58.400 --> 00:39:01.760
<v Speaker 1>case of being the uh like the digital version of

644
00:39:01.880 --> 00:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>gold now is it's completely accepted and I think this

645
00:39:05.400 --> 00:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff will keep growing.

646
00:39:06.440 --> 00:39:08.519
<v Speaker 3>But itself, itsself contained.

647
00:39:09.519 --> 00:39:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I think the ethereum e TF with Ethereum consider being

648
00:39:13.639 --> 00:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>considered almost a common good. That is, like it's like

649
00:39:17.800 --> 00:39:20.639
<v Speaker 1>a socialized platform to build interesting stuff on top. Like

650
00:39:20.719 --> 00:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the global computer is even more transformational because the equidy

651
00:39:24.079 --> 00:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to go straight into that. So I think

652
00:39:26.480 --> 00:39:30.639
<v Speaker 1>it is it is impossible to overstate the importance of

653
00:39:31.679 --> 00:39:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this for for the sector.

654
00:39:34.000 --> 00:39:35.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's it's pretty exciting.

655
00:39:36.440 --> 00:39:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's on a noteway Etheroreum. Do you view

656
00:39:39.480 --> 00:39:42.480
<v Speaker 2>it as you mentioned global computer? Do you view it

657
00:39:42.639 --> 00:39:47.280
<v Speaker 2>as a software almost where anybody can plug in open

658
00:39:47.320 --> 00:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>source software.

659
00:39:49.880 --> 00:39:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I think Ethereum blurs the.

660
00:39:56.280 --> 00:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>The distinction between what is software when is what is hardware?

661
00:39:59.599 --> 00:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a software that allows the use of

662
00:40:02.400 --> 00:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>shared hardware. It's defacto hardware, but it's it's a it's

663
00:40:09.039 --> 00:40:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's somewhere in between. But I think, in my opinion,

664
00:40:11.960 --> 00:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is it's software hardware infrastructure that allows anyone to actually

665
00:40:18.239 --> 00:40:24.159
<v Speaker 1>build something great without the cost of bootstrapping, Like an

666
00:40:24.199 --> 00:40:28.119
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure that that provides security so anyone can do and

667
00:40:28.280 --> 00:40:32.159
<v Speaker 1>do stuff by sharing this consensus security that the ethereum

668
00:40:32.280 --> 00:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is and this consensus memory that ethereum is, so I

669
00:40:35.920 --> 00:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's something, it's something in between.

670
00:40:38.519 --> 00:40:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what are your thoughts on cryptoregulations? Obviously around the

671
00:40:44.280 --> 00:40:47.599
<v Speaker 2>globe there's different countries working on these things. Here in

672
00:40:47.639 --> 00:40:50.159
<v Speaker 2>the United States, there's been a lot of movement lately

673
00:40:50.320 --> 00:40:54.679
<v Speaker 2>with Congress and Democrats joining Republicans where it's going to

674
00:40:54.840 --> 00:40:57.639
<v Speaker 2>help bring clarity between what's the security what's not, what's

675
00:40:57.719 --> 00:41:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the SEC's role, what's the CFTC's role, because that's hindering

676
00:41:01.880 --> 00:41:04.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of innovators here in the United States at least.

677
00:41:05.199 --> 00:41:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we see comprehensive regulations by next year?

678
00:41:11.679 --> 00:41:12.039
<v Speaker 3>This is.

679
00:41:13.639 --> 00:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>This is too difficult for me. I don't think we will.

680
00:41:18.320 --> 00:41:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm pessimistic in the short term. I'm optimistic in the

681
00:41:21.360 --> 00:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>long term for the same reason, which is political pragmatism.

682
00:41:27.719 --> 00:41:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I think this is this this issue is extremely.

683
00:41:32.199 --> 00:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Charged up politically, and politicians in good or bad faith,

684
00:41:36.920 --> 00:41:42.519
<v Speaker 1>will use it as an issue to rally their own

685
00:41:42.840 --> 00:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>electorate on. It's also a very charged up point because

686
00:41:48.719 --> 00:41:52.199
<v Speaker 1>there are powerful lobbies that are lobbying one side or

687
00:41:52.239 --> 00:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the other. But I think in the long term, I

688
00:41:56.519 --> 00:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the technological superiority of cryptoids so obvious that

689
00:42:02.079 --> 00:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>it will keep pushing use cases, and use cases will

690
00:42:04.800 --> 00:42:08.119
<v Speaker 1>keep pushing interests of the public, and politicians tend to

691
00:42:08.199 --> 00:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to the public because the public votes them. So

692
00:42:12.760 --> 00:42:14.559
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that in the next in the

693
00:42:14.679 --> 00:42:19.119
<v Speaker 1>next year, I'm not too optimistic, although I hope for

694
00:42:19.760 --> 00:42:23.039
<v Speaker 1>a constructive and an open, an open and good faith

695
00:42:23.239 --> 00:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>debate about about regulation required regulation. But I'm not too

696
00:42:28.480 --> 00:42:31.559
<v Speaker 1>optimistic that we're going to find absolute clarity. But I

697
00:42:31.599 --> 00:42:35.199
<v Speaker 1>think the direction is relatively clear, and I'm very optimistic

698
00:42:35.239 --> 00:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>over the next five to ten.

699
00:42:37.440 --> 00:42:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm in agreement with you. There. Look, I got

700
00:42:40.800 --> 00:42:43.239
<v Speaker 2>some wrap up questions here for you. First, if you

701
00:42:43.280 --> 00:42:45.280
<v Speaker 2>could create your own Matter verse, what would the team be.

702
00:42:47.599 --> 00:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a I have pretty schizophrenic interests. There will

703
00:42:51.480 --> 00:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of like radio player, one type of

704
00:42:54.039 --> 00:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>like randomic universe with everything in.

705
00:42:56.280 --> 00:42:59.519
<v Speaker 2>It nice and rapid fire questions.

706
00:42:59.599 --> 00:43:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Favorite food.

707
00:43:02.360 --> 00:43:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Italian and I'm a Japanese obsessed person, so I

708
00:43:06.199 --> 00:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>think I would say both like Italian cuisine and Japanese

709
00:43:09.440 --> 00:43:14.159
<v Speaker 1>one minimal great great ingredients, quality of the ingredients, and

710
00:43:15.000 --> 00:43:16.119
<v Speaker 1>attention of the craft.

711
00:43:16.679 --> 00:43:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Mm hm.

712
00:43:17.719 --> 00:43:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Favorite musician are bad.

713
00:43:20.800 --> 00:43:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Ah. Going back to the ready player, one thing. I

714
00:43:23.360 --> 00:43:26.079
<v Speaker 1>am an opera fan I love I love Italian opera,

715
00:43:26.320 --> 00:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but I also love hip hop, mainly his.

716
00:43:30.480 --> 00:43:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Cost All School hip hop.

717
00:43:32.320 --> 00:43:34.440
<v Speaker 2>M favorite movie.

718
00:43:36.639 --> 00:43:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Tampopo is a Japanese movie about food from the seventies.

719
00:43:41.239 --> 00:43:42.519
<v Speaker 3>Pretty niche but pretty good.

720
00:43:43.159 --> 00:43:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I'll have to check that out. I haven't heard about it,

721
00:43:45.039 --> 00:43:47.320
<v Speaker 2>but I'll check it out. Favorite book.

722
00:43:49.599 --> 00:43:52.079
<v Speaker 3>I think Ulysses by James Joyce.

723
00:43:52.840 --> 00:43:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm. And when you're not working at M zero,

724
00:43:55.239 --> 00:43:56.079
<v Speaker 2>what are you doing for fun?

725
00:43:57.880 --> 00:44:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I used to be a semi professional and and sathlete,

726
00:44:02.079 --> 00:44:04.639
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not competitive anymore, but I still do a

727
00:44:04.679 --> 00:44:07.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of sports. So I'm a mountaineer. I do a

728
00:44:07.559 --> 00:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of like very very long races in the mountains

729
00:44:10.920 --> 00:44:15.760
<v Speaker 1>without sleeping and when my wife allows me. So family

730
00:44:16.000 --> 00:44:17.559
<v Speaker 1>is the most important thing for me.

731
00:44:18.280 --> 00:44:19.679
<v Speaker 3>Better will work, for.

732
00:44:19.760 --> 00:44:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Luca, really great chatting with you. I'm excited for

733
00:44:23.559 --> 00:44:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the future updates around I'M zero. But thank you so

734
00:44:25.960 --> 00:44:26.639
<v Speaker 2>much for joining me.

735
00:44:27.880 --> 00:44:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Tony, A pleasure.
