WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.800 --> 00:00:05.759
<v Speaker 1>It's Night Side with Dan Ray on WBS Constance Video.

2
00:00:07.280 --> 00:00:10.320
<v Speaker 2>In just a moment, we will introduce you, reintroduce you

3
00:00:10.439 --> 00:00:15.759
<v Speaker 2>to friend Dave Paleologus. We had Spencer Kimball with us

4
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>last night and Dave Paleologus of Suffolk University tonight, and

5
00:00:20.199 --> 00:00:26.079
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of drilling down on polling up specifically political polling.

6
00:00:26.120 --> 00:00:29.239
<v Speaker 2>And it's not often you can get a double play

7
00:00:29.280 --> 00:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>combination of Kimball and Paleo Logus and back to back night.

8
00:00:32.719 --> 00:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>So consider yourself lucky, you know, I consider myself very

9
00:00:36.039 --> 00:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>lucky here. And if you have questions for Dave Paleologus.

10
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:40.280
<v Speaker 3>You can line them up right now.

11
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:42.600
<v Speaker 2>But before we do that, got to give away a

12
00:00:42.600 --> 00:00:45.240
<v Speaker 2>couple of tickets here. As we are gonna give away

13
00:00:45.240 --> 00:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>two tickets every night right after the nine o'clock news.

14
00:00:47.960 --> 00:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>You need to be calling number ten right now six one, seven, nine, three,

15
00:00:53.399 --> 00:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>one ten thirty will win two tickets to Celtic Thunder

16
00:00:57.320 --> 00:01:01.399
<v Speaker 2>at the Premier Theater at Foxwoods on November seventh. He'll

17
00:01:01.439 --> 00:01:04.359
<v Speaker 2>set off on a musical journey with the Irish music

18
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>sensations Celtic Thunder Live. Complete show info and tickets are

19
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:13.159
<v Speaker 2>available at Foxwoods dot com. All you have to be

20
00:01:13.439 --> 00:01:16.519
<v Speaker 2>is caller number ten, and I will remind you Dan,

21
00:01:16.640 --> 00:01:19.280
<v Speaker 2>our producer is simply going to answer the phone call

22
00:01:19.280 --> 00:01:21.120
<v Speaker 2>a one, call a two, call of three and move

23
00:01:21.200 --> 00:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>right through it. Uh and he will only let us

24
00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:27.319
<v Speaker 2>know when we have caller number ten and you can

25
00:01:27.359 --> 00:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>call back.

26
00:01:27.920 --> 00:01:28.920
<v Speaker 3>So if you're.

27
00:01:28.840 --> 00:01:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Lucky enough to get through at call he number three,

28
00:01:30.640 --> 00:01:32.680
<v Speaker 2>call back, you just have to land. It's almost like

29
00:01:32.680 --> 00:01:35.400
<v Speaker 2>a case of musical chairs here on night Side. Do

30
00:01:35.560 --> 00:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>not call on any other number because the only number

31
00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to be answer writing right now. If

32
00:01:40.319 --> 00:01:42.519
<v Speaker 2>you want to talk to Dave Pale Logus, you call

33
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:44.599
<v Speaker 2>him the regular number which is six one seven, two,

34
00:01:44.599 --> 00:01:46.959
<v Speaker 2>five four to ten thirty, but the number now six

35
00:01:47.079 --> 00:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>one seven, nine three one ten thirty. Call on number

36
00:01:50.799 --> 00:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>ten will win two tickets to see Celtic Thunder next

37
00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:58.040
<v Speaker 2>week at the Premier Theater at Foxwoods on November seventh.

38
00:01:58.280 --> 00:02:01.159
<v Speaker 2>He'll set off on a musical journey with the Irish

39
00:02:01.239 --> 00:02:07.239
<v Speaker 2>music sensations. Celtic Thunder Live. Complete show info tickets available

40
00:02:07.239 --> 00:02:09.439
<v Speaker 2>at Foxwoods dot com. So as soon as we get

41
00:02:09.439 --> 00:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the number and I can see that, the phone lines

42
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:13.639
<v Speaker 2>will lit up very quickly coming right down to it.

43
00:02:13.719 --> 00:02:16.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's probably I would say, I'm going to hear

44
00:02:16.960 --> 00:02:20.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty quickly from Dan that he has a uh, that

45
00:02:20.599 --> 00:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>he has the tenth caller within a matter of a

46
00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:24.800
<v Speaker 2>few just got a winner right now, So you can

47
00:02:24.840 --> 00:02:27.719
<v Speaker 2>stop calling. We'll be back tomorrow night, right after the

48
00:02:27.800 --> 00:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>nine o'clock news with another pair of tickets, and another

49
00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:33.319
<v Speaker 2>pair on Friday night. But we have our winter tonight,

50
00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>so you can stop calling. Six one, seven, nine three.

51
00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Dave Paley Logus, Welcome back to Nightside.

52
00:02:39.960 --> 00:02:40.400
<v Speaker 3>How are you.

53
00:02:41.400 --> 00:02:43.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm wow, great to be here.

54
00:02:44.479 --> 00:02:46.280
<v Speaker 3>This is showtime for you. Huh.

55
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:49.719
<v Speaker 2>This is uh, this is the week that we've all

56
00:02:49.759 --> 00:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>been waiting for five days or whatever. It is Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday,

57
00:02:55.599 --> 00:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and then it's showtime.

58
00:02:57.960 --> 00:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I remember at the beginning of this year,

59
00:03:00.319 --> 00:03:03.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, thinking, oh, six months, I have to do

60
00:03:03.120 --> 00:03:05.479
<v Speaker 4>all of these polls and everything. Am I ever going

61
00:03:05.520 --> 00:03:08.120
<v Speaker 4>to get through it? And here it is next Tuesday.

62
00:03:08.840 --> 00:03:13.639
<v Speaker 2>We talked with your colleague, uh, and he was He

63
00:03:13.719 --> 00:03:16.439
<v Speaker 2>said that that you're was you were his mentor. He

64
00:03:16.560 --> 00:03:18.800
<v Speaker 2>was with you at Suffolk for a while. He's out

65
00:03:18.840 --> 00:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in his own now is an Emerson Polster, and he

66
00:03:21.080 --> 00:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>was going through how you folks have had to adapt

67
00:03:24.599 --> 00:03:28.759
<v Speaker 2>to technology, technical changes we no longer you know, look

68
00:03:28.759 --> 00:03:29.719
<v Speaker 2>at calling people on.

69
00:03:29.680 --> 00:03:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Telephones and all of that.

70
00:03:32.039 --> 00:03:36.639
<v Speaker 2>How tough is it to call these races, particularly a

71
00:03:36.680 --> 00:03:40.479
<v Speaker 2>presidential race, accurately? How tough is it to do that?

72
00:03:40.960 --> 00:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Has it become easier with technology or more difficult?

73
00:03:44.759 --> 00:03:47.360
<v Speaker 4>I think it's become more difficult. You know, the technology

74
00:03:47.439 --> 00:03:53.120
<v Speaker 4>is terrific in terms of reaching a lot of potential voters,

75
00:03:53.240 --> 00:03:56.360
<v Speaker 4>but it's getting a complete you know. I mean, some

76
00:03:56.439 --> 00:03:59.280
<v Speaker 4>surveys are fifteen minutes long. People don't have that long

77
00:04:00.919 --> 00:04:03.400
<v Speaker 4>in their own lives to spend on a phone call.

78
00:04:04.800 --> 00:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>But I mean we're you know, when we release a

79
00:04:06.759 --> 00:04:09.960
<v Speaker 4>national pull of a thousand respondents, we probably have to

80
00:04:10.280 --> 00:04:14.400
<v Speaker 4>call twenty five thirty thousand households to get the right

81
00:04:14.520 --> 00:04:16.920
<v Speaker 4>one thousand. That is the right proportion of all the

82
00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:22.800
<v Speaker 4>demographics geography, age, gender, and political party affiliation, all of that.

83
00:04:23.040 --> 00:04:27.120
<v Speaker 4>So it's more about getting the proportions right as it

84
00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:31.319
<v Speaker 4>is doing a poll of ten thousand people five hundred people.

85
00:04:31.639 --> 00:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's assume you start out right, and what

86
00:04:36.040 --> 00:04:38.319
<v Speaker 2>do you do? You take a wave of you know

87
00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:42.279
<v Speaker 2>a couple thousand people, and at that point, when you're

88
00:04:42.319 --> 00:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>starting fresh, you need certain percentage of men, certain percentage women, Democrats, Republicans, independents,

89
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:52.040
<v Speaker 2>different ethnic backgrounds, different states. I assume it's like filling

90
00:04:52.079 --> 00:04:53.879
<v Speaker 2>in dots on a map.

91
00:04:54.600 --> 00:04:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Or am I oversimplifying it?

92
00:04:56.800 --> 00:05:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, it is. It is. Every poster has a

93
00:05:00.959 --> 00:05:05.839
<v Speaker 4>different methodology. What we do is we set parameters by geography,

94
00:05:06.160 --> 00:05:09.519
<v Speaker 4>and then what we'll do is we'll divide whether we're

95
00:05:09.519 --> 00:05:14.319
<v Speaker 4>calling nationally or particular state into regions, and then within

96
00:05:14.439 --> 00:05:19.000
<v Speaker 4>those regions, we fill buckets of demographics that most accurately

97
00:05:19.079 --> 00:05:21.920
<v Speaker 4>reflect what we believe will be game conditions on election

98
00:05:22.040 --> 00:05:24.639
<v Speaker 4>day in this election, and part of it is based

99
00:05:24.680 --> 00:05:28.560
<v Speaker 4>on historical trends twenty twenty exit polls and so on,

100
00:05:29.319 --> 00:05:32.560
<v Speaker 4>and then we kind of mix in with that current

101
00:05:32.920 --> 00:05:37.920
<v Speaker 4>movements both by the census and people migrating from one

102
00:05:37.959 --> 00:05:41.720
<v Speaker 4>area to another, and different demographic changes that may occur

103
00:05:43.040 --> 00:05:47.759
<v Speaker 4>since the last presidential election. And when you add it

104
00:05:47.800 --> 00:05:50.920
<v Speaker 4>all up, it comes out right. If the proportions are right,

105
00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:55.199
<v Speaker 4>it comes out right. And that's the most difficult part,

106
00:05:55.279 --> 00:05:58.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, is to make sure that you've got the

107
00:05:58.160 --> 00:06:02.920
<v Speaker 4>correct apustion of whites, black, old, young, Democrats, Republicans and

108
00:06:02.959 --> 00:06:09.000
<v Speaker 4>so on. And you know it's once you get it set,

109
00:06:09.120 --> 00:06:11.519
<v Speaker 4>once the planning of what we call the sample frame

110
00:06:11.639 --> 00:06:15.439
<v Speaker 4>is completed, then the phoning just kind of flows. You know,

111
00:06:15.519 --> 00:06:18.519
<v Speaker 4>we monitor the first night, make sure that the calls

112
00:06:18.519 --> 00:06:21.319
<v Speaker 4>are being done correctly, the skips are right on the questionnaire,

113
00:06:22.279 --> 00:06:26.160
<v Speaker 4>and it just kind of it rolls for two or

114
00:06:26.160 --> 00:06:28.879
<v Speaker 4>three days in the field, and then we gather the

115
00:06:28.959 --> 00:06:31.879
<v Speaker 4>data back and we presented and published the results.

116
00:06:32.519 --> 00:06:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Now, Spencer Kimber last night said they no longer use people,

117
00:06:36.120 --> 00:06:37.199
<v Speaker 2>They're using computers.

118
00:06:37.199 --> 00:06:41.199
<v Speaker 3>Are you still people based or we are?

119
00:06:41.439 --> 00:06:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we are. It's more expensive, and I know Spencer

120
00:06:44.879 --> 00:06:48.759
<v Speaker 4>has got a little bit of a tighter budget, and

121
00:06:48.879 --> 00:06:55.000
<v Speaker 4>his methodology is mixed. It's online panels and it's either

122
00:06:55.120 --> 00:06:59.120
<v Speaker 4>our methodology. They do use some live caller, but it's

123
00:06:59.199 --> 00:07:05.319
<v Speaker 4>small percent. We have always used live callers, professional phone banks.

124
00:07:05.439 --> 00:07:08.439
<v Speaker 4>We continue to use live calls. It doesn't mean that

125
00:07:08.439 --> 00:07:11.600
<v Speaker 4>that's a better methodology than someone else's polling, but we

126
00:07:11.759 --> 00:07:14.839
<v Speaker 4>found it to be pretty good and in terms of

127
00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:21.279
<v Speaker 4>the accuracy, it's it's worked out well for Suffolk, Okay.

128
00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:23.519
<v Speaker 2>It's worked out very well for Suffolk And by the way,

129
00:07:23.639 --> 00:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>just so people understand, you do much more than political polling,

130
00:07:27.319 --> 00:07:31.439
<v Speaker 2>give us an idea of the scope of your operation.

131
00:07:32.920 --> 00:07:33.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

132
00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:35.399
<v Speaker 4>So, we do a lot of policy research and we

133
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:38.279
<v Speaker 4>do some creative polling that a lot of a lot

134
00:07:38.319 --> 00:07:42.360
<v Speaker 4>of other institutes don't do. And you know, we've done

135
00:07:42.839 --> 00:07:46.959
<v Speaker 4>just like exclusive polls of black voters only in Michigan

136
00:07:47.000 --> 00:07:50.160
<v Speaker 4>and Pennsylvania this year, the only research out there that

137
00:07:50.319 --> 00:07:53.399
<v Speaker 4>did that. We did an exclusive pole of Hispanic voters

138
00:07:53.399 --> 00:07:58.720
<v Speaker 4>in Arizona and Nevada anticipating some of some of the

139
00:07:58.920 --> 00:08:03.920
<v Speaker 4>recent demographic trends. That was unique. We've pulled the French

140
00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:10.120
<v Speaker 4>France election a couple of cycles ago, done. We've done

141
00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:15.399
<v Speaker 4>issues like when the Russian Federation invaded Ukraine and there

142
00:08:15.439 --> 00:08:18.480
<v Speaker 4>were teahouses in New York that were being vandalized, Russian

143
00:08:18.480 --> 00:08:22.600
<v Speaker 4>tea houses because people were upset at Russia for the invasion.

144
00:08:23.959 --> 00:08:27.839
<v Speaker 4>It was a student inspired research. We actually polled five

145
00:08:27.920 --> 00:08:31.560
<v Speaker 4>hundred Russian Americans in the US and five hundred Ukrainian

146
00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Americans in the US, and we've determined that there was

147
00:08:34.840 --> 00:08:38.440
<v Speaker 4>not a lot of difference. Both subsets didn't like Putin,

148
00:08:38.519 --> 00:08:42.600
<v Speaker 4>didn't like Russia, and were more or less pro Ukrainian.

149
00:08:42.679 --> 00:08:46.879
<v Speaker 4>So we've used the research in many ways to differentiate ourselves.

150
00:08:46.879 --> 00:08:50.600
<v Speaker 4>We also do city view polls of urban areas on

151
00:08:50.799 --> 00:08:57.679
<v Speaker 4>police and racism and other urban issues. So we're using

152
00:08:57.759 --> 00:09:00.720
<v Speaker 4>our platform to really get into the space.

153
00:09:01.960 --> 00:09:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I would assume that a lot of Russians who would

154
00:09:04.399 --> 00:09:06.679
<v Speaker 2>be in this country are in this country because they

155
00:09:06.720 --> 00:09:07.519
<v Speaker 2>don't like Putin.

156
00:09:08.240 --> 00:09:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Exactly, if you.

157
00:09:09.879 --> 00:09:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Don't like Putin and you're in Russia, it's probably a

158
00:09:11.919 --> 00:09:14.919
<v Speaker 2>tough place to live. My guest today, pale Logus, Dave,

159
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:16.559
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you a little bit.

160
00:09:16.639 --> 00:09:19.080
<v Speaker 3>I know that you've just have some poles.

161
00:09:19.759 --> 00:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>You've got some poles either coming out tomorrow or came

162
00:09:22.000 --> 00:09:24.919
<v Speaker 2>out earlier today, different states. If I recall from our

163
00:09:24.960 --> 00:09:27.120
<v Speaker 2>conversation of earlier this week and might correct on that.

164
00:09:28.080 --> 00:09:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So Monday we released Wisconsin. We had Trump up

165
00:09:31.279 --> 00:09:36.720
<v Speaker 4>by one in Wisconsin, and we released a Wisconsin bell

166
00:09:36.720 --> 00:09:39.399
<v Speaker 4>Weather area, which a lot of the local people here

167
00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:42.559
<v Speaker 4>and know from Suffolk pass polling. We not only do

168
00:09:42.639 --> 00:09:44.399
<v Speaker 4>the state wide pole, which everybody does, we do the

169
00:09:44.399 --> 00:09:50.440
<v Speaker 4>bell Weather area, which was dor County, and Harris actually

170
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:53.879
<v Speaker 4>did a little bit better in the bell Weather in

171
00:09:53.960 --> 00:09:57.039
<v Speaker 4>door County than she did in the statewide Today we

172
00:09:57.080 --> 00:10:01.799
<v Speaker 4>released Michigan. Michigan was a dead even race. Harris was

173
00:10:01.879 --> 00:10:05.600
<v Speaker 4>up one in that Bellwether Kent County, and Friday were

174
00:10:05.600 --> 00:10:07.519
<v Speaker 4>releasing Pennsylvania.

175
00:10:07.879 --> 00:10:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I noticed that today five thirty eight dropped Trump's

176
00:10:11.559 --> 00:10:14.519
<v Speaker 2>chances from fifty four to fifty three out of one

177
00:10:14.600 --> 00:10:17.679
<v Speaker 2>hundred down to fifty one. I'd like to I know

178
00:10:17.720 --> 00:10:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you're not associated with five thirty eight, but your polls

179
00:10:20.240 --> 00:10:22.519
<v Speaker 2>are taken in consideration by then. It sounds to me

180
00:10:22.600 --> 00:10:24.519
<v Speaker 2>like your polls might have had an influence in that

181
00:10:25.759 --> 00:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>that decision by five poin fifty eight. Did I read

182
00:10:27.840 --> 00:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>that correctly?

183
00:10:28.960 --> 00:10:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? They did. They did. They do use our polls,

184
00:10:31.360 --> 00:10:36.960
<v Speaker 4>and they incorporated that they obviously didn't expect us to

185
00:10:37.039 --> 00:10:39.679
<v Speaker 4>have Michigan. Even a lot of the polls have Trump

186
00:10:39.679 --> 00:10:43.960
<v Speaker 4>winning Michigan, but it is a coin flip right now,

187
00:10:44.639 --> 00:10:48.799
<v Speaker 4>and he very well could win it, but because it

188
00:10:48.879 --> 00:10:51.240
<v Speaker 4>is a margin of error race. But that poll did

189
00:10:51.279 --> 00:10:55.399
<v Speaker 4>impact their five thirty eight rating. And in addition to that,

190
00:10:55.559 --> 00:11:00.799
<v Speaker 4>CNN dropped a couple of polls today, both in Wisconsin

191
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and Michigan, showing Harris winning by between five and six

192
00:11:04.360 --> 00:11:08.279
<v Speaker 4>points which was really vastly different than all of the polling,

193
00:11:08.840 --> 00:11:12.279
<v Speaker 4>especially the ones showing Trump leading. So that kind of

194
00:11:13.200 --> 00:11:15.240
<v Speaker 4>throw a monkey wrench into their model.

195
00:11:15.799 --> 00:11:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly, nothing like some surprises at the end. Will

196
00:11:19.840 --> 00:11:22.200
<v Speaker 2>take a break if folks would like to join the

197
00:11:22.200 --> 00:11:25.519
<v Speaker 2>conversation with Dave Paleologus six one, seven, two, five, four

198
00:11:25.480 --> 00:11:29.559
<v Speaker 2>to ten thirty six one seven, nine three one ten thirty,

199
00:11:29.960 --> 00:11:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and we'll we'll break down some of these states and

200
00:11:32.879 --> 00:11:36.679
<v Speaker 2>get some sense as to where no one's going to

201
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:38.279
<v Speaker 2>be able to predict it for you, but you can

202
00:11:38.320 --> 00:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>probably read between the lines or listen to what you

203
00:11:41.039 --> 00:11:44.399
<v Speaker 2>hear Dave Paleologus say and pick up some interesting insights.

204
00:11:44.440 --> 00:11:45.919
<v Speaker 3>Back on Nightside right after this.

205
00:11:47.799 --> 00:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Now back to Dan Ray live from the Window World

206
00:11:51.080 --> 00:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Nightside Studios on WBZ News Radio.

207
00:11:55.159 --> 00:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Dave were a little short here on time to the news,

208
00:11:58.120 --> 00:12:00.159
<v Speaker 2>so I'm going to hold off the calls and to

209
00:12:00.279 --> 00:12:02.440
<v Speaker 2>right after the news and we will get to the

210
00:12:02.440 --> 00:12:04.679
<v Speaker 2>calls immediately. Can do you have some time to take

211
00:12:04.679 --> 00:12:06.320
<v Speaker 2>some calls, By the way, I don't want to be presentable.

212
00:12:06.320 --> 00:12:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, absolutely great.

213
00:12:08.159 --> 00:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much so. This race, I was hoping

214
00:12:13.600 --> 00:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>for a decisive win for either one of the candidates,

215
00:12:18.320 --> 00:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>because I think if we have to go through what

216
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:22.399
<v Speaker 2>we went through in twenty twenty again with a close

217
00:12:22.519 --> 00:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>race and all sorts of protestations and arguments and all that,

218
00:12:26.799 --> 00:12:28.679
<v Speaker 2>it looks to me like what I'm hearing you say

219
00:12:28.759 --> 00:12:31.039
<v Speaker 2>is that there's no chance that this is going to

220
00:12:31.039 --> 00:12:35.120
<v Speaker 2>be a big, easy win for either one of these candidates.

221
00:12:35.120 --> 00:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>This is going to go down to the wire. It

222
00:12:36.519 --> 00:12:38.240
<v Speaker 3>sounds to me like what you're telling me. Now, Am

223
00:12:38.240 --> 00:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I reading you correctly?

224
00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:43.360
<v Speaker 4>If the polls are accurate, you're yes. But if there

225
00:12:43.399 --> 00:12:46.039
<v Speaker 4>is a polling miss across the board by even two

226
00:12:46.120 --> 00:12:50.039
<v Speaker 4>or three points, Kamalin Harris could sweep or Trump could sweep.

227
00:12:50.799 --> 00:12:55.279
<v Speaker 4>So it really will depend on the sort of the

228
00:12:55.399 --> 00:12:59.679
<v Speaker 4>aggregate of the polling averages in each of the states.

229
00:13:00.600 --> 00:13:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I got a quick question in the past. In

230
00:13:04.159 --> 00:13:09.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen and even in twenty twenty, Trump did better

231
00:13:09.200 --> 00:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>than he was polling every once I think familiar with

232
00:13:11.600 --> 00:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the numbers. You know, Joe Biden was ahead of him

233
00:13:13.600 --> 00:13:17.039
<v Speaker 2>by a certain percentage points in certain states. Hillary Clinton

234
00:13:17.080 --> 00:13:19.759
<v Speaker 2>was even further ahead of him. Is there a hidden

235
00:13:19.759 --> 00:13:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Trump vote out there that you folks cannot calculate or

236
00:13:22.919 --> 00:13:24.960
<v Speaker 2>have you been able to figure out how to work

237
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:26.399
<v Speaker 2>that into these numbers.

238
00:13:26.879 --> 00:13:29.639
<v Speaker 4>Well, it wasn't twenty sixteen and twenty twenty. Part of

239
00:13:29.679 --> 00:13:33.440
<v Speaker 4>the reason was that all of the pollsters weren't factoring

240
00:13:33.480 --> 00:13:37.159
<v Speaker 4>in education level. People with less than a college degree

241
00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:41.919
<v Speaker 4>disproportionately support Trump, people with a college degree or better

242
00:13:42.159 --> 00:13:46.440
<v Speaker 4>disproportionately support the Democratic nominee for president. I think the

243
00:13:46.519 --> 00:13:51.399
<v Speaker 4>polling community caught up in twenty twenty, but they didn't

244
00:13:51.440 --> 00:13:54.159
<v Speaker 4>include what we call the recall question, which is who

245
00:13:54.159 --> 00:13:57.320
<v Speaker 4>did you vote for in the last election, Which means,

246
00:13:57.879 --> 00:14:01.440
<v Speaker 4>if you have a poll today, h and you ask

247
00:14:01.519 --> 00:14:05.759
<v Speaker 4>the recall question, who did you vote for in twenty twenty,

248
00:14:05.799 --> 00:14:11.080
<v Speaker 4>and it's fifteen points higher for Biden or for Trump,

249
00:14:11.840 --> 00:14:15.519
<v Speaker 4>you know that the polling subsample is wrong, and so

250
00:14:15.720 --> 00:14:19.559
<v Speaker 4>pulses need to adjust for that. If you include both

251
00:14:19.559 --> 00:14:25.120
<v Speaker 4>the educational the correct proportions of educational attainment, and the

252
00:14:25.159 --> 00:14:29.080
<v Speaker 4>recall question from the previous election, you'll probably do a

253
00:14:29.080 --> 00:14:30.519
<v Speaker 4>pretty good job calling the race.

254
00:14:31.759 --> 00:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>So then you think that there is something in that

255
00:14:34.799 --> 00:14:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Trump camp who was saying, oh, you know, as long

256
00:14:36.799 --> 00:14:38.799
<v Speaker 2>as it's tied, Trump's going to win by four or

257
00:14:38.840 --> 00:14:42.679
<v Speaker 2>five points, because that's that's been his track. But what

258
00:14:42.720 --> 00:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>you're saying is that that now has been calculated in

259
00:14:46.440 --> 00:14:50.679
<v Speaker 2>and that quote unquote hidden Trump vote is probably not

260
00:14:50.840 --> 00:14:54.679
<v Speaker 2>there as strong this time as it was four years

261
00:14:54.720 --> 00:14:56.440
<v Speaker 2>ago or eight years ago.

262
00:14:56.759 --> 00:15:01.399
<v Speaker 4>I don't I don't think to the extent that there

263
00:15:01.440 --> 00:15:05.360
<v Speaker 4>was an over an overcall in twenty twenty twenty sixteen.

264
00:15:05.399 --> 00:15:08.240
<v Speaker 4>It was a very big gap twenty twenty, a gap,

265
00:15:08.320 --> 00:15:11.440
<v Speaker 4>but not as big. I think that the polling community

266
00:15:11.720 --> 00:15:14.039
<v Speaker 4>is catching up with the Trump factor. There are some

267
00:15:14.080 --> 00:15:17.879
<v Speaker 4>people who think that Trump will be overpolled. If you

268
00:15:17.960 --> 00:15:21.799
<v Speaker 4>look at the polling and the Republican primaries back in

269
00:15:21.840 --> 00:15:25.799
<v Speaker 4>the spring, Trump was overpolled and he wasn't hitting the

270
00:15:25.840 --> 00:15:29.120
<v Speaker 4>mark as high as what the pollsters had him at.

271
00:15:29.200 --> 00:15:31.720
<v Speaker 4>So there is a school of thought. There are people

272
00:15:31.720 --> 00:15:35.360
<v Speaker 4>out there who say, maybe Kamala Harris is being underpolled,

273
00:15:36.519 --> 00:15:40.279
<v Speaker 4>especially in communities and rural communities where people don't want

274
00:15:40.320 --> 00:15:43.960
<v Speaker 4>to say they're voting Democratic in a rural area to

275
00:15:44.080 --> 00:15:46.720
<v Speaker 4>a pollster, and it's more of a closet goal for

276
00:15:46.759 --> 00:15:50.960
<v Speaker 4>the Democrat. So I don't buy into, well, you know,

277
00:15:51.039 --> 00:15:54.080
<v Speaker 4>we're all missing Trump by five or six points across

278
00:15:54.120 --> 00:15:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the board. I could be wrong, but I think the

279
00:15:56.639 --> 00:15:58.200
<v Speaker 4>polling community has kind of caught.

280
00:15:58.080 --> 00:15:58.440
<v Speaker 5>Up with that.

281
00:15:59.559 --> 00:16:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and my last question before we go to the news,

282
00:16:02.279 --> 00:16:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll go to phone calls right after that.

283
00:16:06.320 --> 00:16:08.759
<v Speaker 2>Trump seems to be, for the polls I see, seems

284
00:16:08.759 --> 00:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>to be doing better with black and Latino voters than

285
00:16:12.080 --> 00:16:14.840
<v Speaker 2>he has in the past and other Republicans. Is that

286
00:16:14.960 --> 00:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>number going to melt between now and Tuesday or or

287
00:16:21.159 --> 00:16:23.360
<v Speaker 2>do you think that's going to hold from what you've seen.

288
00:16:24.399 --> 00:16:26.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, Harris is going to win both

289
00:16:27.000 --> 00:16:33.480
<v Speaker 4>blacks and overwhelmingly and Hispanics pretty comfortably. The only problem

290
00:16:33.600 --> 00:16:37.799
<v Speaker 4>Harris has is young Black men ages thirty eighteen to

291
00:16:37.840 --> 00:16:42.440
<v Speaker 4>thirty four. Those voters are voting for either Trump or

292
00:16:42.480 --> 00:16:47.240
<v Speaker 4>third party in higher proportions than four years ago. Hispanics

293
00:16:47.360 --> 00:16:50.919
<v Speaker 4>it's eighteen eight It's young Hispanic men and middle aged

294
00:16:50.960 --> 00:16:54.559
<v Speaker 4>Hispanic men. Because we did in our Hispanic only poland Nevada.

295
00:16:54.639 --> 00:16:59.519
<v Speaker 4>In Arizona ages eighteen to fifty, they were voting for

296
00:16:59.559 --> 00:17:04.359
<v Speaker 4>Trump by twelve thirteen points, whereas they were splitting evenly

297
00:17:04.720 --> 00:17:07.920
<v Speaker 4>between Trump and Biden four years ago. So those are

298
00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:12.240
<v Speaker 4>the if you micro target just those categories, those are

299
00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:15.839
<v Speaker 4>the only categories within Hispanic and Black which are problematic

300
00:17:15.839 --> 00:17:18.440
<v Speaker 4>for Harris, and she still hasn't cracked that yet. She

301
00:17:18.559 --> 00:17:21.880
<v Speaker 4>still hasn't won back the young black voter, a young

302
00:17:21.920 --> 00:17:26.960
<v Speaker 4>black male voter, and the young male Hispanic voter and

303
00:17:27.119 --> 00:17:29.160
<v Speaker 4>middle aged male Hispanic voter.

304
00:17:29.920 --> 00:17:34.359
<v Speaker 2>So the actual voted twenty twenty with Biden amongst black voters.

305
00:17:34.880 --> 00:17:36.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm sure you know this so off the top

306
00:17:36.279 --> 00:17:37.319
<v Speaker 3>of your head, I don't.

307
00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:41.160
<v Speaker 2>It was by something like ninety percent and Trump was

308
00:17:41.279 --> 00:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>nine percent.

309
00:17:44.839 --> 00:17:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was not. In the swing states, it was

310
00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:51.000
<v Speaker 4>ninety two to seven, Okay, swing and right now and

311
00:17:51.079 --> 00:17:54.359
<v Speaker 4>right now and right now, Harris is like eighty to

312
00:17:54.400 --> 00:17:57.400
<v Speaker 4>fifteen or eighty to sixteen, which you would say, well,

313
00:17:57.400 --> 00:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>that's still great, and it is great, but it's not

314
00:18:00.359 --> 00:18:03.319
<v Speaker 4>the night. She's got to get up to ninety percent

315
00:18:03.400 --> 00:18:06.000
<v Speaker 4>in the black community, and young black men are holding

316
00:18:06.480 --> 00:18:09.799
<v Speaker 4>that number down a little bit. And the reason is

317
00:18:09.839 --> 00:18:12.880
<v Speaker 4>because in Pennsylvania, which is really a red state except

318
00:18:12.880 --> 00:18:17.599
<v Speaker 4>for Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, black voters have to overwhelmingly deliver

319
00:18:17.680 --> 00:18:21.200
<v Speaker 4>a big margin coming out of Philadelphia County in order

320
00:18:21.240 --> 00:18:25.000
<v Speaker 4>to carry Pennsylvania. Same thing with Detroit carrying it into

321
00:18:25.000 --> 00:18:26.319
<v Speaker 4>the rural areas of Michigan.

322
00:18:27.160 --> 00:18:29.920
<v Speaker 2>So if Harris can't get up to that to the

323
00:18:29.960 --> 00:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Biden level in a really close race, why does she

324
00:18:34.559 --> 00:18:37.799
<v Speaker 2>make up that difference. If she can't make it up

325
00:18:37.839 --> 00:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>amongst you know, young black men.

326
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:43.799
<v Speaker 4>She makes it up in two areas. Number One, older voters.

327
00:18:43.839 --> 00:18:47.279
<v Speaker 4>She's polling older voters better than Biden did. Believe it

328
00:18:47.359 --> 00:18:50.839
<v Speaker 4>or not, Trump was winning. Trump was winning older voters.

329
00:18:50.839 --> 00:18:54.279
<v Speaker 4>In the exit polls, She's capturing more older voters than

330
00:18:54.319 --> 00:18:57.839
<v Speaker 4>Biden did four years ago. And there were some Republicans,

331
00:18:57.839 --> 00:19:01.880
<v Speaker 4>disaffected Republicans where Haley voters who will never vote for

332
00:19:02.359 --> 00:19:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Harris but they haven't really warmed up to Trump. They

333
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:08.400
<v Speaker 4>are voting for Trump, but in many of these state

334
00:19:08.480 --> 00:19:11.920
<v Speaker 4>ballots they have multiple other third party options, yep. And

335
00:19:11.960 --> 00:19:14.920
<v Speaker 4>they could just say, look, I'm going to vote for

336
00:19:15.039 --> 00:19:18.839
<v Speaker 4>the Libertarian candidate or the Constitutional Party candidate, and that

337
00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:20.119
<v Speaker 4>would be costly to Trump.

338
00:19:20.759 --> 00:19:23.799
<v Speaker 2>I assume his pollsters, Trump's posters are telling him the

339
00:19:23.839 --> 00:19:26.599
<v Speaker 2>same thing. They must be seeing the same numbers you're seeing.

340
00:19:27.640 --> 00:19:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think do you think that Trump, at

341
00:19:29.920 --> 00:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>some point in the next few days is going to

342
00:19:31.799 --> 00:19:33.799
<v Speaker 2>say I got to call NICKI Haley and I got

343
00:19:33.960 --> 00:19:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to make some appearances with Nicki Haley.

344
00:19:37.240 --> 00:19:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I absolutely believe that. You know, I just

345
00:19:40.519 --> 00:19:47.440
<v Speaker 4>saw Nicki Haley interviewed and she was campaigning for McCormick

346
00:19:47.799 --> 00:19:50.880
<v Speaker 4>in Pennsylvania, and they were like, are you're going to

347
00:19:50.920 --> 00:19:53.960
<v Speaker 4>be with Trump? And she basically said, I haven't heard

348
00:19:53.960 --> 00:19:55.960
<v Speaker 4>from him since June. I think you heard that.

349
00:19:56.200 --> 00:19:56.680
<v Speaker 3>I heard that.

350
00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:02.039
<v Speaker 2>So how can Trump be that dumb or that's stubborn? If, if,

351
00:20:02.400 --> 00:20:05.039
<v Speaker 2>if that could be what he needs to push himself

352
00:20:05.440 --> 00:20:06.079
<v Speaker 2>over the line.

353
00:20:06.119 --> 00:20:07.839
<v Speaker 3>That's that's to me interesting.

354
00:20:08.680 --> 00:20:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean it's kind of a character flaw. It's

355
00:20:10.680 --> 00:20:13.880
<v Speaker 4>a character flaw. He doesn't he doesn't want anyone taking

356
00:20:13.920 --> 00:20:16.480
<v Speaker 4>credit If he believes he's gonna win, he doesn't want

357
00:20:16.480 --> 00:20:20.079
<v Speaker 4>anybody taking credit for it, especially Nikki Haley. He has

358
00:20:20.119 --> 00:20:23.319
<v Speaker 4>his own VP, and there's a certain pride factor which

359
00:20:23.440 --> 00:20:26.559
<v Speaker 4>could come back and bite him off. Yeah, that's that's

360
00:20:26.599 --> 00:20:29.000
<v Speaker 4>a decision that his campaign has to figure out. They

361
00:20:29.039 --> 00:20:31.039
<v Speaker 4>have to go through the poll. They won't pulling numbers

362
00:20:31.079 --> 00:20:34.480
<v Speaker 4>and figure that out, or it could be costly in

363
00:20:34.880 --> 00:20:36.119
<v Speaker 4>one or two of these swing states.

364
00:20:36.160 --> 00:20:37.599
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they're running out of time.

365
00:20:38.680 --> 00:20:42.559
<v Speaker 2>As simple as that, David, let's do this, Let's let's

366
00:20:42.559 --> 00:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>hold on. We'll get callers on the other side. We'll

367
00:20:44.680 --> 00:20:46.759
<v Speaker 2>be right back. I promise I'll have a quick newscast

368
00:20:46.799 --> 00:20:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to be right back.

369
00:20:47.519 --> 00:20:49.759
<v Speaker 3>We'll go to the callers. My name's Dan Ray.

370
00:20:50.200 --> 00:20:53.880
<v Speaker 2>His is Day Pale Logus, along with Spencer Kimball and

371
00:20:54.200 --> 00:20:57.119
<v Speaker 2>John Zogby. I don't think you can find better pollsters

372
00:20:57.119 --> 00:21:00.160
<v Speaker 2>than these three gentlemen, and I get a sense that

373
00:21:00.319 --> 00:21:04.079
<v Speaker 2>all three of them are seeing this fairly similarly. I

374
00:21:04.240 --> 00:21:06.880
<v Speaker 2>just commend them to you. It's your decision whether you

375
00:21:06.880 --> 00:21:08.319
<v Speaker 2>want to believe him or not. We'll be back on

376
00:21:08.400 --> 00:21:11.039
<v Speaker 2>Nightside six one, seven, two, five, four, ten thirty or

377
00:21:11.079 --> 00:21:13.880
<v Speaker 2>six one, seven, nine three thirty. You can talk to

378
00:21:13.920 --> 00:21:16.880
<v Speaker 2>a polster, one of the best, live right after the news.

379
00:21:19.000 --> 00:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It's Night Side with Dan d Boston's news Radio.

380
00:21:24.640 --> 00:21:27.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, ready to go, let's I'm looking folks for questions.

381
00:21:28.200 --> 00:21:31.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's no sense of trying to argue with

382
00:21:31.839 --> 00:21:37.279
<v Speaker 2>Dave Pelly Logus, but ask whatever questions you like, because frankly, uh,

383
00:21:37.640 --> 00:21:40.119
<v Speaker 2>he's equipped with a lot of information.

384
00:21:40.640 --> 00:21:40.759
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

385
00:21:41.200 --> 00:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>It seems to me that this race has gone back

386
00:21:43.960 --> 00:21:47.319
<v Speaker 2>and forth Dave, and a week ago, I think the

387
00:21:47.400 --> 00:21:49.680
<v Speaker 2>numbers would have been a little stronger for Trump. And

388
00:21:49.759 --> 00:21:52.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe he's hitting a little bit of maybe he hit

389
00:21:52.160 --> 00:21:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a plateau, maybe he's he's sliding here. That's the only

390
00:21:55.000 --> 00:21:57.279
<v Speaker 2>thing I can I can figure as I follow the numbers.

391
00:21:57.599 --> 00:21:59.839
<v Speaker 2>You know the numbers better than me. How far off

392
00:22:00.079 --> 00:22:01.160
<v Speaker 2>I on that analysis?

393
00:22:01.880 --> 00:22:05.160
<v Speaker 4>No, not far off at all. I mean I have

394
00:22:05.279 --> 00:22:07.359
<v Speaker 4>the same feeling just looking at the numbers. I think

395
00:22:07.359 --> 00:22:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Trump peaked probably a week or so ago, and either

396
00:22:12.920 --> 00:22:16.799
<v Speaker 4>the pendulum is swinging slowly back to Kamala Harris, or

397
00:22:17.359 --> 00:22:21.039
<v Speaker 4>maybe Trump is plateauing, as you say, and he's kind

398
00:22:21.039 --> 00:22:24.440
<v Speaker 4>of coasting into Tuesday. But no matter what happens, it's

399
00:22:24.480 --> 00:22:28.400
<v Speaker 4>really all about field operation right now, getting your vote

400
00:22:28.440 --> 00:22:32.279
<v Speaker 4>identified and knocking on doors and pulling them out on

401
00:22:32.400 --> 00:22:33.079
<v Speaker 4>election day.

402
00:22:33.960 --> 00:22:35.119
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go to the call.

403
00:22:35.200 --> 00:22:37.319
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna go first to Nick and Weymouth. Nick, you

404
00:22:37.400 --> 00:22:40.599
<v Speaker 2>are first this hour a Night'sie with Suffolk University poster

405
00:22:40.920 --> 00:22:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Dave Pale logus. Go ahead, Nick, Okay. If Nick's not ready,

406
00:22:46.640 --> 00:22:48.720
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna move on. We're putting Nick on hold. He's

407
00:22:48.720 --> 00:22:52.079
<v Speaker 2>obviously not ready, and we're gonna go to Dan. Please

408
00:22:52.119 --> 00:22:54.440
<v Speaker 2>put Nick on hold, if you would, thank you very much.

409
00:22:54.519 --> 00:22:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to Stephen Cambridge, Steven Cambridge, You're first up.

410
00:22:57.480 --> 00:22:58.279
<v Speaker 3>Go right ahead, Steve.

411
00:23:02.240 --> 00:23:06.559
<v Speaker 6>People who will answer posters and people who won't, So

412
00:23:06.640 --> 00:23:10.440
<v Speaker 6>to some degree, anybody who answers a poster is self selecting.

413
00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:13.000
<v Speaker 6>Do you ever think about that? And do you have

414
00:23:13.039 --> 00:23:15.039
<v Speaker 6>any way to control for that?

415
00:23:17.119 --> 00:23:20.279
<v Speaker 2>I clipped you at the beginning. That was my mistake, Steve,

416
00:23:20.359 --> 00:23:23.119
<v Speaker 2>I clipped you at the beginning. Just rephrase that question

417
00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:25.400
<v Speaker 2>quickly for Dave Paleologus plays.

418
00:23:25.079 --> 00:23:28.200
<v Speaker 6>There are people who will answer posters questions and people

419
00:23:28.200 --> 00:23:32.680
<v Speaker 6>who will never answer posters questions. So to some degree,

420
00:23:32.680 --> 00:23:36.759
<v Speaker 6>the people who answer posters questions are self selecting part

421
00:23:36.799 --> 00:23:41.119
<v Speaker 6>of the population. Does Dave have any way of controlling

422
00:23:41.200 --> 00:23:43.119
<v Speaker 6>for that or does he ever think about that?

423
00:23:43.519 --> 00:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Great question?

424
00:23:44.359 --> 00:23:47.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I do think about it. And the answer to

425
00:23:47.559 --> 00:23:51.720
<v Speaker 4>the question is that the that person who doesn't answer

426
00:23:51.759 --> 00:23:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the call does not have any unique demographic that we

427
00:23:56.200 --> 00:24:00.359
<v Speaker 4>won't pick up at some point with numerous trials. In

428
00:24:00.400 --> 00:24:04.039
<v Speaker 4>other words, if that person is a conservative white male

429
00:24:04.160 --> 00:24:08.079
<v Speaker 4>between the ages of thirty and forty five, some not

430
00:24:08.240 --> 00:24:11.400
<v Speaker 4>every you know, not every white male between thirty and

431
00:24:11.480 --> 00:24:17.319
<v Speaker 4>forty five has that resistance to being interviewed. And so

432
00:24:17.359 --> 00:24:22.799
<v Speaker 4>the key is that every demographic is represented, and some

433
00:24:23.319 --> 00:24:26.920
<v Speaker 4>demographics are harder to get others than others. For example,

434
00:24:27.680 --> 00:24:29.799
<v Speaker 4>what we do in the last night of calling is

435
00:24:29.839 --> 00:24:33.200
<v Speaker 4>we what we call quota phil which means that if

436
00:24:33.240 --> 00:24:37.599
<v Speaker 4>there are demographics that are lower that we need to increase,

437
00:24:37.720 --> 00:24:39.839
<v Speaker 4>we have two options. We can either weight the sample

438
00:24:39.920 --> 00:24:42.920
<v Speaker 4>at the end or fill quotas. I don't like waiting

439
00:24:43.119 --> 00:24:47.000
<v Speaker 4>is a general rule, because it pulls another demographic out

440
00:24:47.039 --> 00:24:50.119
<v Speaker 4>of whack. It's like whackamo. You adjust for one demographic

441
00:24:50.160 --> 00:24:52.119
<v Speaker 4>and something else pops up and it's out of whack,

442
00:24:52.319 --> 00:24:54.759
<v Speaker 4>and you adjust for that and so on. So what

443
00:24:54.839 --> 00:24:58.640
<v Speaker 4>I would rather do is fill quotas. So it's time consuming,

444
00:24:58.759 --> 00:25:01.039
<v Speaker 4>it costs a lot of money, but I think it's

445
00:25:01.079 --> 00:25:03.240
<v Speaker 4>well worth it if you can fill quotas and have

446
00:25:03.599 --> 00:25:09.119
<v Speaker 4>a balanced survey responding pool that matches the correct proportions demographically.

447
00:25:09.319 --> 00:25:15.200
<v Speaker 6>Dave one more question, and I mean this respectfully. Definitely,

448
00:25:15.319 --> 00:25:18.079
<v Speaker 6>all of this polling makes for very good news copy

449
00:25:18.720 --> 00:25:22.599
<v Speaker 6>and the public likes it. Makes everything exciting. Do you

450
00:25:22.759 --> 00:25:30.039
<v Speaker 6>see it serving any real purpose in terms of what's

451
00:25:30.039 --> 00:25:33.160
<v Speaker 6>good for the country or what's good for our democracy,

452
00:25:33.200 --> 00:25:35.519
<v Speaker 6>et cetera, et cetera. Do you see any real purpose

453
00:25:35.599 --> 00:25:35.920
<v Speaker 6>in it.

454
00:25:37.519 --> 00:25:39.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I do. I mean, I'm very bullish on it.

455
00:25:39.839 --> 00:25:42.559
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we did on an entire poll on sexual harassment

456
00:25:42.599 --> 00:25:46.839
<v Speaker 4>in the workplace, sexual assault. It had an incredible amount

457
00:25:46.920 --> 00:25:50.720
<v Speaker 4>of staying power. We called we did a poll of

458
00:25:50.880 --> 00:25:55.279
<v Speaker 4>unregistered unlikely voters, which nobody pulls. Everybody polls likely voters,

459
00:25:55.680 --> 00:25:59.599
<v Speaker 4>and we found really interesting findings about the one hundred

460
00:25:59.680 --> 00:26:02.359
<v Speaker 4>million people who won't vote in the United States who

461
00:26:02.400 --> 00:26:05.279
<v Speaker 4>are eligible to vote. So I think the polling does

462
00:26:05.680 --> 00:26:08.559
<v Speaker 4>teach us a lot and informs us of how we

463
00:26:08.599 --> 00:26:11.559
<v Speaker 4>can be better as a society. One of the projects

464
00:26:11.599 --> 00:26:14.599
<v Speaker 4>we did at the university was we did a poll

465
00:26:14.799 --> 00:26:20.720
<v Speaker 4>of Newark residents. Because Newark had a consent decree against

466
00:26:20.759 --> 00:26:23.440
<v Speaker 4>itself with the Department of Justice, and the DJ approached

467
00:26:23.480 --> 00:26:26.079
<v Speaker 4>Suffolk asking us to bid on it. We did a

468
00:26:26.160 --> 00:26:30.200
<v Speaker 4>survey of residents of Newark and we made some really

469
00:26:30.359 --> 00:26:33.960
<v Speaker 4>stiff recommendations for the Newark Police Department, some of which

470
00:26:34.000 --> 00:26:36.799
<v Speaker 4>they adopted, some of which they didn't. The year after

471
00:26:36.839 --> 00:26:40.319
<v Speaker 4>that poll was published, not a shot was fired by

472
00:26:40.400 --> 00:26:44.279
<v Speaker 4>a Newark police officer in an entire year, and so

473
00:26:44.599 --> 00:26:47.559
<v Speaker 4>one of my students, Keith Horvath, who still works for me.

474
00:26:47.960 --> 00:26:49.880
<v Speaker 4>I remember him saying. He came right out of the

475
00:26:49.880 --> 00:26:53.160
<v Speaker 4>classroom and he said, I can't believe that this poll.

476
00:26:53.319 --> 00:26:56.680
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the poll we worked on saved lives.

477
00:26:56.960 --> 00:26:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I've never ever felt that way. And I was stuck

478
00:27:00.119 --> 00:27:03.200
<v Speaker 4>fund to hear a student say that to me, that

479
00:27:03.519 --> 00:27:08.599
<v Speaker 4>a poll, just a little poll, this student believed saved lies.

480
00:27:08.680 --> 00:27:11.720
<v Speaker 4>But the truth is is that the police department adopted

481
00:27:11.720 --> 00:27:14.880
<v Speaker 4>the recommendations and maybe some good can come out of it.

482
00:27:14.880 --> 00:27:16.920
<v Speaker 4>It's not a perfect unit.

483
00:27:16.720 --> 00:27:19.200
<v Speaker 6>About the presidential polling. Do you think good can come

484
00:27:19.200 --> 00:27:19.720
<v Speaker 6>out of it?

485
00:27:20.759 --> 00:27:23.519
<v Speaker 4>I think it can in terms of the undecided voters,

486
00:27:24.200 --> 00:27:27.400
<v Speaker 4>and you can be informed about like what under like

487
00:27:27.519 --> 00:27:33.160
<v Speaker 4>we're undecided thinking of voting. For example, we published third

488
00:27:33.200 --> 00:27:36.960
<v Speaker 4>party candidates everybody that's listed on the ballot. Let's say

489
00:27:37.000 --> 00:27:41.400
<v Speaker 4>that Jill Stein and Cornell West get a larger proportion

490
00:27:41.559 --> 00:27:44.160
<v Speaker 4>of the vote than we're currently showing at the expense

491
00:27:44.200 --> 00:27:48.160
<v Speaker 4>of Kamala Harris. Trump could win that state if Jill

492
00:27:48.240 --> 00:27:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Stein upticks and Cornell West uptics in Michigan, for example,

493
00:27:53.799 --> 00:27:57.240
<v Speaker 4>that is an important finding, and that's why we report

494
00:27:57.440 --> 00:28:00.960
<v Speaker 4>every candidate that's listed on a ballot. Some posters they'll

495
00:28:01.000 --> 00:28:04.559
<v Speaker 4>do just Kamala Harris versus Donald Trump, two people. Then

496
00:28:04.599 --> 00:28:08.200
<v Speaker 4>they'll have an option for another, uh, you know, an

497
00:28:08.200 --> 00:28:11.559
<v Speaker 4>other choice. And if the respondent names it, they names it,

498
00:28:11.920 --> 00:28:14.960
<v Speaker 4>they name it. We actually name all of the candidates

499
00:28:14.960 --> 00:28:17.599
<v Speaker 4>because those little third party candidates at are half a

500
00:28:17.640 --> 00:28:20.000
<v Speaker 4>point or a quarter of a point in a tight

501
00:28:20.119 --> 00:28:22.160
<v Speaker 4>race could make all the difference in the world.

502
00:28:22.759 --> 00:28:25.000
<v Speaker 6>Thank you both, Thank you, Dan, Thank you Dave.

503
00:28:25.599 --> 00:28:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Great question marks, great questions and great answers. Will be

504
00:28:28.440 --> 00:28:29.759
<v Speaker 2>back good Night Side right after this.

505
00:28:31.359 --> 00:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Now back to Dan Ray live from the Window World

506
00:28:34.480 --> 00:28:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Night Side Studios on WBZ News Radio.

507
00:28:38.759 --> 00:28:42.039
<v Speaker 2>Back to the phones for Poster Suffolk, Poster Dave PAILLEYO logus,

508
00:28:42.240 --> 00:28:43.039
<v Speaker 2>Nick and Weymouth.

509
00:28:43.039 --> 00:28:44.720
<v Speaker 3>You're up, Hope, you're ready? Go ahead? Nick?

510
00:28:45.519 --> 00:28:46.119
<v Speaker 7>Is that ready?

511
00:28:46.519 --> 00:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey?

512
00:28:47.200 --> 00:28:49.559
<v Speaker 7>I'm looking and what I like to look at is

513
00:28:49.599 --> 00:28:54.880
<v Speaker 7>the real clear polling electoral map. What I'm looking at

514
00:28:56.720 --> 00:29:01.160
<v Speaker 7>the toss ups states have recently increased. Okay, they're like

515
00:29:01.160 --> 00:29:03.279
<v Speaker 7>a heart at night now. So it's been reshuffling.

516
00:29:04.000 --> 00:29:07.079
<v Speaker 3>And so there's only fifty states.

517
00:29:07.079 --> 00:29:08.839
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about? One hundred and eight toss

518
00:29:08.880 --> 00:29:10.720
<v Speaker 2>up states? Come on, Nick, what are you talking about?

519
00:29:11.079 --> 00:29:13.440
<v Speaker 7>Is a hard and eight toss up states could go

520
00:29:13.519 --> 00:29:15.000
<v Speaker 7>either way, not staying.

521
00:29:14.839 --> 00:29:16.680
<v Speaker 3>There's only we only have fifty states.

522
00:29:17.039 --> 00:29:19.839
<v Speaker 7>Excuse me, one hundred and eight electoral votes.

523
00:29:20.279 --> 00:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, okay, now you've clarified.

524
00:29:24.720 --> 00:29:26.359
<v Speaker 3>That's good. Nick, go ahead. What's your question?

525
00:29:26.880 --> 00:29:29.559
<v Speaker 7>They for the states that are toss ups. Okay, that

526
00:29:29.960 --> 00:29:31.319
<v Speaker 7>you add up the electoral votes.

527
00:29:31.400 --> 00:29:32.960
<v Speaker 5>That's the hundred I get it, I get it.

528
00:29:33.039 --> 00:29:35.039
<v Speaker 3>Nick. You're wasting my time. What you question?

529
00:29:35.240 --> 00:29:39.920
<v Speaker 7>Let me finish. I'll finish. Okay, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia.

530
00:29:40.519 --> 00:29:42.799
<v Speaker 2>We know the toss up states. Nick, we know the

531
00:29:42.839 --> 00:29:44.599
<v Speaker 2>toss up states. You're wasted my time.

532
00:29:45.640 --> 00:29:50.960
<v Speaker 7>If he wins, If Trump wins Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina,

533
00:29:51.079 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 7>in New Hampshire, he'll get to seventy two based on

534
00:29:55.000 --> 00:29:56.720
<v Speaker 7>my on my calculations.

535
00:29:56.759 --> 00:29:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Good for you, Good for you.

536
00:29:58.400 --> 00:30:00.319
<v Speaker 7>So what you question, Amphony pencil.

537
00:30:00.200 --> 00:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>See you that good night? Okay, I have no he's

538
00:30:03.720 --> 00:30:07.319
<v Speaker 2>just wasting my time here. Let's keep going here, Dave.

539
00:30:08.000 --> 00:30:12.079
<v Speaker 2>There's all sorts of, you know, variations and permutations that

540
00:30:12.160 --> 00:30:14.480
<v Speaker 2>can get different candidates to different numbers.

541
00:30:14.480 --> 00:30:15.599
<v Speaker 3>That's part of the fun of it.

542
00:30:16.000 --> 00:30:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Let me go next to Anthony and Cambridge. Anthony A

543
00:30:18.720 --> 00:30:21.079
<v Speaker 2>little bit more direct on your question. Go ahead, Anthony.

544
00:30:22.119 --> 00:30:27.000
<v Speaker 8>Thank you, Dan, and great to have Dave on. He's fantastic, Dave.

545
00:30:27.759 --> 00:30:31.839
<v Speaker 8>How much how much time money is invested now in

546
00:30:31.920 --> 00:30:35.400
<v Speaker 8>trying to figure out who has voted early and how

547
00:30:35.440 --> 00:30:39.680
<v Speaker 8>to direct the money towards certain demographics. You mentioned that

548
00:30:40.599 --> 00:30:43.799
<v Speaker 8>all the voters have started to swing towards Harris. That's

549
00:30:43.799 --> 00:30:46.880
<v Speaker 8>a group that I would assume would be higher in

550
00:30:46.960 --> 00:30:51.440
<v Speaker 8>early voting. How hot is it to track exactly who

551
00:30:51.480 --> 00:30:55.000
<v Speaker 8>has voted? And I'm just to close, I'm fascinated with

552
00:30:55.359 --> 00:30:58.680
<v Speaker 8>early voting. I think there's a bit of momentum going

553
00:30:59.160 --> 00:31:02.200
<v Speaker 8>for Harris. Seemed to be a little scale and it

554
00:31:02.240 --> 00:31:05.440
<v Speaker 8>could be ironic that, you know, with Trump being so

555
00:31:05.599 --> 00:31:08.680
<v Speaker 8>against early voting, it could turn out that he's the

556
00:31:08.680 --> 00:31:13.720
<v Speaker 8>biggest beneficiary of it if her momentum ends up, you know,

557
00:31:13.839 --> 00:31:16.440
<v Speaker 8>coming at the end and not having the impact it would.

558
00:31:16.480 --> 00:31:19.119
<v Speaker 8>But can you talk a little bit about early voting

559
00:31:19.160 --> 00:31:23.720
<v Speaker 8>and how that impacts everything, because it's it's a fascinating topic, Dan, Thank.

560
00:31:23.559 --> 00:31:24.440
<v Speaker 3>You, David.

561
00:31:25.000 --> 00:31:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

562
00:31:25.400 --> 00:31:29.599
<v Speaker 4>So, the early voting has been Harris in most every

563
00:31:29.599 --> 00:31:32.759
<v Speaker 4>pole that we've been doing, by like thirty points. Now,

564
00:31:32.799 --> 00:31:37.400
<v Speaker 4>that's not unusual. Biden won by thirty one in early

565
00:31:37.559 --> 00:31:41.599
<v Speaker 4>voting in our last national poll four years ago. Harris

566
00:31:41.640 --> 00:31:44.039
<v Speaker 4>was winning by twenty nine in the national poll. So

567
00:31:44.440 --> 00:31:47.839
<v Speaker 4>she's right there in terms of the early voting, and

568
00:31:48.079 --> 00:31:51.279
<v Speaker 4>was seeing the same thing in the swing states as well.

569
00:31:53.599 --> 00:31:57.079
<v Speaker 4>And there were you know, in the swing states for example.

570
00:31:57.960 --> 00:32:02.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, we had a large early lead among Wisconsin

571
00:32:02.039 --> 00:32:07.319
<v Speaker 4>early voters and Trump was winning by one. So the

572
00:32:07.359 --> 00:32:11.799
<v Speaker 4>early voting is an indicator, but it will shift because

573
00:32:11.920 --> 00:32:16.880
<v Speaker 4>mail in voting is all Democratic pretty much. Early in

574
00:32:16.920 --> 00:32:21.720
<v Speaker 4>person voting is more of a mix, and election day

575
00:32:21.799 --> 00:32:26.160
<v Speaker 4>voting is overwhelmingly Trump. So Trump has made improvements in Nevada.

576
00:32:26.200 --> 00:32:29.880
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned Nevada, caller, Nevada is one of those states

577
00:32:29.920 --> 00:32:34.440
<v Speaker 4>where Republicans are overperforming on the early voting, especially in

578
00:32:34.480 --> 00:32:35.799
<v Speaker 4>the rural counties.

579
00:32:36.599 --> 00:32:40.640
<v Speaker 9>All right, but your data is based on polling people

580
00:32:41.079 --> 00:32:46.160
<v Speaker 9>who have voted early, not assumptions based on the demographics

581
00:32:46.279 --> 00:32:49.279
<v Speaker 9>or of the data of people who voted. How much

582
00:32:49.319 --> 00:32:53.960
<v Speaker 9>information do you get from the local and state elected

583
00:32:54.119 --> 00:32:57.599
<v Speaker 9>you know, election officials on who has voted.

584
00:32:58.559 --> 00:33:02.240
<v Speaker 4>We watched that and it changes from day to day,

585
00:33:02.319 --> 00:33:05.119
<v Speaker 4>and you can you know, there's a website where you

586
00:33:05.119 --> 00:33:08.119
<v Speaker 4>can track how how much of the early voting has

587
00:33:08.160 --> 00:33:10.680
<v Speaker 4>come in, Like in Massachusetts, I think a million two

588
00:33:10.720 --> 00:33:15.160
<v Speaker 4>have already voted something like that, a million three out

589
00:33:15.200 --> 00:33:18.400
<v Speaker 4>of the whatever three point six or whatever. However many

590
00:33:18.400 --> 00:33:22.680
<v Speaker 4>people vote Massachusetts, and you can get statistics updated every

591
00:33:22.759 --> 00:33:26.640
<v Speaker 4>day on what the early voting is, and sometimes they

592
00:33:26.680 --> 00:33:30.400
<v Speaker 4>include like whether or not they know information about the

593
00:33:30.440 --> 00:33:35.119
<v Speaker 4>age differences, the party differences, and you know, obviously Democrats

594
00:33:35.119 --> 00:33:38.559
<v Speaker 4>are turning out in higher intensity and that reflects higher

595
00:33:38.640 --> 00:33:43.079
<v Speaker 4>excitement for Harris. But Biden had Bob Biden had it

596
00:33:43.119 --> 00:33:44.160
<v Speaker 4>as well.

597
00:33:44.559 --> 00:33:46.359
<v Speaker 8>Most of those assumptions.

598
00:33:45.799 --> 00:33:47.599
<v Speaker 3>Based on Anthony.

599
00:33:47.799 --> 00:33:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Anthony, pardon me, Anthony, I have one of the call

600
00:33:50.400 --> 00:33:52.559
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to get to. Okay, so thank you again here,

601
00:33:52.799 --> 00:33:54.359
<v Speaker 2>thank you, Welcome to Anthony, Thank you. Let me go

602
00:33:54.359 --> 00:33:56.039
<v Speaker 2>to Scott and Quincy. Scott, you got to be quick

603
00:33:56.039 --> 00:33:57.200
<v Speaker 2>for me or the end of the line.

604
00:33:57.200 --> 00:34:01.200
<v Speaker 5>Go right ahead, Yes, indeed, Dan, great show. Right, So, hey,

605
00:34:01.240 --> 00:34:06.359
<v Speaker 5>I'd like to know about the correlation between news media

606
00:34:06.440 --> 00:34:12.519
<v Speaker 5>outlet coverage of Trump versus Harris. When I watched the

607
00:34:12.599 --> 00:34:16.719
<v Speaker 5>Evening News on YouTube, you can see in their hashmarks

608
00:34:16.760 --> 00:34:19.800
<v Speaker 5>on the bottom of the screen, like three quarters of

609
00:34:19.880 --> 00:34:24.000
<v Speaker 5>the content on a lot of the nightly news shows,

610
00:34:24.119 --> 00:34:28.159
<v Speaker 5>it's like about how horrible Donald Trump is and is

611
00:34:28.199 --> 00:34:33.119
<v Speaker 5>that type of media coverage skewing people's opinions across the nation?

612
00:34:33.559 --> 00:34:37.239
<v Speaker 5>And Dan question for you should it be legal? Should

613
00:34:37.320 --> 00:34:40.480
<v Speaker 5>news media outlets have to give equal time to both

614
00:34:40.519 --> 00:34:43.760
<v Speaker 5>sides of the story and to do what they want.

615
00:34:43.800 --> 00:34:45.800
<v Speaker 2>That's why we have a First Amendment. The First Amendment

616
00:34:45.800 --> 00:34:48.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't regulate what news media outlets. I perceive on some

617
00:34:48.920 --> 00:34:53.960
<v Speaker 2>of the nightly newscast particularly ABC a bias, but that's

618
00:34:53.960 --> 00:34:56.360
<v Speaker 2>my personal observation. Might be right, it might be wrong.

619
00:34:56.599 --> 00:34:59.119
<v Speaker 2>Day paleologus, you do not track that correct.

620
00:35:00.440 --> 00:35:03.079
<v Speaker 4>No, but it's a good question. And if there are

621
00:35:03.239 --> 00:35:06.320
<v Speaker 4>races where there is a high undecided, then you have

622
00:35:06.400 --> 00:35:09.440
<v Speaker 4>the halo effect, which is that you can be influenced

623
00:35:09.519 --> 00:35:14.039
<v Speaker 4>by what you what signals you are receiving, and what

624
00:35:14.280 --> 00:35:17.880
<v Speaker 4>you're what you're hearing, such that your opinion would be

625
00:35:17.920 --> 00:35:22.800
<v Speaker 4>shaped positively or negatively based on getting that repetition of

626
00:35:22.880 --> 00:35:28.000
<v Speaker 4>signals barraging into your brain cells. And where in this

627
00:35:28.079 --> 00:35:31.239
<v Speaker 4>situation you have a low undecided, it's probably less likely

628
00:35:31.320 --> 00:35:35.159
<v Speaker 4>people are pretty much hunkered down and they you know,

629
00:35:35.320 --> 00:35:38.679
<v Speaker 4>in terms of who they're going to vote for. But

630
00:35:38.880 --> 00:35:41.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, I mean, I'm in kind of an interesting

631
00:35:41.519 --> 00:35:45.880
<v Speaker 4>position because we have I have multiple media partners, some

632
00:35:45.920 --> 00:35:48.760
<v Speaker 4>of which take an active role politically and some which don't.

633
00:35:49.199 --> 00:35:52.000
<v Speaker 4>For example, we partner with the Boston Globe. We've been

634
00:35:52.039 --> 00:35:56.760
<v Speaker 4>a longtime partner of the Globe. They endorsed in this

635
00:35:56.920 --> 00:36:02.440
<v Speaker 4>presidential election USA today, which we do the other states

636
00:36:02.440 --> 00:36:05.000
<v Speaker 4>and national pulling with they have stained they did not

637
00:36:05.199 --> 00:36:09.519
<v Speaker 4>endorse for a candidate in the presidential election. So some

638
00:36:09.719 --> 00:36:14.199
<v Speaker 4>media outlets are due to ownership or due to their

639
00:36:14.280 --> 00:36:18.400
<v Speaker 4>political philosophies. They're dictated by how involved they get, whether

640
00:36:18.440 --> 00:36:24.000
<v Speaker 4>it's broadcast media or newspaper in terms of putting out

641
00:36:24.199 --> 00:36:26.480
<v Speaker 4>an abundance of information one way or the other.

642
00:36:27.000 --> 00:36:29.519
<v Speaker 2>All right, Scott, we're flat out of time. I thank

643
00:36:29.559 --> 00:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>you very much, got for your question. Thank you, sir,

644
00:36:32.599 --> 00:36:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Dave Paley Locus. I thank you immentally, thank you so

645
00:36:35.360 --> 00:36:41.119
<v Speaker 2>much for once again giving us some insights, valuable insights.

646
00:36:41.199 --> 00:36:44.480
<v Speaker 2>And let's see what happens on Tuesday night. Maybe we'll

647
00:36:44.480 --> 00:36:46.719
<v Speaker 2>talk Tuesday night at some point if you might be

648
00:36:46.760 --> 00:36:49.480
<v Speaker 2>available as the real votes and the real numbers start

649
00:36:49.480 --> 00:36:51.239
<v Speaker 2>to come in and see how close they are to

650
00:36:51.280 --> 00:36:54.760
<v Speaker 2>what you and Spencer and others.

651
00:36:54.480 --> 00:36:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Have found that would be great. And thank you listeners

652
00:36:58.320 --> 00:36:59.519
<v Speaker 4>for those great questions.

653
00:36:59.559 --> 00:37:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate the good questions. Yes there were.

654
00:37:01.920 --> 00:37:03.719
<v Speaker 2>I was confused, but the guy was telling me now

655
00:37:03.800 --> 00:37:08.320
<v Speaker 2>about one hundred and eight states. I'm sorry about that. Anyway,

656
00:37:08.360 --> 00:37:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't confused, but I think he was. Thanks Dave

657
00:37:10.280 --> 00:37:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Paley Logus. We will talk soon. Thank you, my friend. Okay,

658
00:37:13.480 --> 00:37:17.199
<v Speaker 2>thanks very much. Back right after the ten o'clock news,

659
00:37:17.239 --> 00:37:19.400
<v Speaker 2>we're going to talk about would you buy a haunted house.

660
00:37:19.400 --> 00:37:21.360
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna just get a little lighter for a moment.

661
00:37:21.519 --> 00:37:22.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll go back to politics later
