Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: In the American way is to stop evil, I personally believe,
Speaker 1: and I think the Founders would agree.
Speaker 2: That's why they bet everything on this. That that's why.
Speaker 1: God, divine providence, in the words of the Founders, allowed
Speaker 1: America to be created, helped America to be created, and
Speaker 1: has helped America to thrive. To stop evil. Do good things,
Speaker 1: but first stop evil. So when we sit here on
Speaker 1: a day like this and we realize.
Speaker 2: The evil behavior.
Speaker 1: That was in our midst at the highest levels and
Speaker 1: shook the very foundations of this country, it's got to
Speaker 1: make you furious. But then the key is throw smart punches,
Speaker 1: not wild punches when you get furious. And that's not
Speaker 1: always easy, right, we're all and there's such a thing
Speaker 1: as righteous anger. But if that righteous anger causes you
Speaker 1: to throw a dumb punch, it may actually aid evil.
Speaker 1: So that's where we'll start the show today. Obviously, I'm
Speaker 1: talking about the behavior of Barack Obama and the people
Speaker 1: at the highest levels of his government after Donald Trump
Speaker 1: won the election.
Speaker 2: But at the same time, let me say it again.
Speaker 2: I said it yesterday.
Speaker 1: I've got to say it over and over again because
Speaker 1: I think there are a lot of good people out
Speaker 1: there right now who have this righteous anger toward what
Speaker 1: Barack Obama and others did to Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Don't be fooled.
Speaker 1: Barack Obama is not going to be charged criminally. He
Speaker 1: is not going to be charged. He's not going to
Speaker 1: be arrested. He's not going to be convicted. That ain't
Speaker 1: going to happen. It doesn't mean he didn't do evil things.
Speaker 1: He did at the highest level, and it was designed
Speaker 1: to take down Donald Trump. It was a kupat empt,
Speaker 1: and it did tremendous harm to this nation. By the
Speaker 1: grace of God and the voters of America, not as
Speaker 1: Republican voters, you know, this country was held together and
Speaker 1: now we're off to more great things than this term.
Speaker 1: But the fact that it was evil doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: a it was criminal, because there aren't statutes designed to
Speaker 1: address every kind of evil out there. Number Two, if
Speaker 1: it was criminal, it doesn't mean that the evidence exists
Speaker 1: necessary to charge and convict. And even if it was
Speaker 1: criminal and the evidence is there to charge and convict,
Speaker 1: you still run into presidential immunity. And so no, Barack
Speaker 1: Obama is not going to be charged, he's not going
Speaker 1: to be tried, he's not.
Speaker 2: Going to be convicted.
Speaker 1: But he did some really evil things and America needs
Speaker 1: to know it. And that's why it's good that Trump
Speaker 1: is out there, that his administration is out there informing
Speaker 1: people now. Because as a Democrat, a former Democrat for many,
Speaker 1: many years, I can tell you that that there are
Speaker 1: an awful lot of Democrats who won't support evil, an
Speaker 1: awful lot of Democrats who oppose evil, an awful lot
Speaker 1: of Democrats who have died for this country. And so
Speaker 1: it's important that everybody, including a lot of people who
Speaker 1: vote for Democrats, that they understand the evil things Barack
Speaker 1: Obama and his top people did after Donald Trump won,
Speaker 1: and we can then talk about why do you think
Speaker 1: Obama did it? Did he do it just as a partisan?
Speaker 1: I don't think so, because he never liked the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party much.
Speaker 2: I think he's shown that in a lot of different ways.
Speaker 2: Why did he do it?
Speaker 1: And when we talk about Barack Obama again, I understand
Speaker 1: he's a five tool player. He has all these skills,
Speaker 1: his intelligence, good looks, he's a great talker, he's all
Speaker 1: these things that let him come from nowhere to be
Speaker 1: a two term president.
Speaker 2: I get all of that.
Speaker 1: But as we've documented on this show so many times before,
Speaker 1: and it has nothing to do with race, It has
Speaker 1: nothing to do with anything else. It has to do
Speaker 1: with radicalism. Barack Obama always has been an extreme radical
Speaker 1: in Sheep's clothing, And what do radicals want to do?
Speaker 1: Radicals want to undermine America as we know it so
Speaker 1: they can rebuild it.
Speaker 2: The way they want it.
Speaker 1: And Obama went about that and in a lot of
Speaker 1: different ways well at the same time on the surface,
Speaker 1: appealing to lots of different people. So I think these
Speaker 1: evil things that are now being very well documented and reported,
Speaker 1: not reported by the commercial media, by the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: but all these evil things, all these evil things, need
Speaker 1: to be exposed. So I hope the pressure stays on.
Speaker 1: I hope the White House keeps talking about it. But
Speaker 1: please don't lead people to believe Barack Obama's going to
Speaker 1: be arrested, because he's not.
Speaker 2: Now, what about people around Obama.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't have to face presidential immunity, But again
Speaker 1: I would caution you all of the people around Obama
Speaker 1: who were involved in doing these very evil things that
Speaker 1: started on a particular date, December nine of twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: At least, as we can tell from the evidence, all
Speaker 1: of these people around him highly intelligent people. Now, as
Speaker 1: we know, highly intelligent people often do evil, but highly
Speaker 1: intelligent people who knew Trump was going to be the
Speaker 1: incoming president. Does anybody have any reason to believe that
Speaker 1: those people were going to be stupid enough to leave
Speaker 1: the kind of trail necessary to be criminally charged.
Speaker 2: I don't think so.
Speaker 1: So I just don't want people getting their hopes up
Speaker 1: that they're going to be criminal prosecutions of these high
Speaker 1: level people who did very evil things that cause great
Speaker 1: harm to our country. We just need to make make
Speaker 1: sure the full truth is known about them, about what
Speaker 1: they did, about what they tried to do, and make
Speaker 1: sure it never happens again. Three oh three seven one
Speaker 1: three eight the non text DA N five seven seven
Speaker 1: three nine. So we'll dive into all of that. I
Speaker 1: really hope you find it interesting. Obviously, I want you
Speaker 1: to listen to this show. But if you know we
Speaker 1: are going to get into some facts, we are going
Speaker 1: to get into some dates. I know that's tough when
Speaker 1: you're drive, and believe me, I drive two. But I
Speaker 1: do think it's important for everybody to know how this
Speaker 1: actually came down. But the starting point is, please don't
Speaker 1: be sitting there expecting criminal prosecutions. And an exhibit a
Speaker 1: on that, as I mentioned yesterday, is if Trump really
Speaker 1: expected Obama to be charged, the President wouldn't be out
Speaker 1: there saying the things that he is right now about
Speaker 1: Obama committing trees and et cetera. Because if a former
Speaker 1: president is going to be charged, that former president is.
Speaker 2: Going to have the best lawyers available in.
Speaker 1: The world, unlimited resources, that the case is going to
Speaker 1: be very very closely watched by the courts. In any
Speaker 1: indication that the President of the United States had put
Speaker 1: his thumb on the scale with DOJ or potential jury
Speaker 1: would undermine the prosecution. So there's no way a highly
Speaker 1: intelligent person like President Trump would be out there putting
Speaker 1: out videos of Obama being arrested in the Oval Office
Speaker 1: while Trump laughed. If he really expected there to be
Speaker 1: a prosecution three or three seven one three eight.
Speaker 2: Two, five five texts DA and five seven, seven.
Speaker 1: Thirty nine will dive into all of that sound, starting
Speaker 1: with Tulsa Gabbard, and keep in mind everything we're hearing
Speaker 1: right now from Tulsi Gabbard is very, very, very important.
Speaker 1: But keep in mind we're hearing it from Tulsa Gabbard,
Speaker 1: We're not hearing it from DOJ.
Speaker 2: So Ryan thoughts before we dive into the evidence itself.
Speaker 3: Well, it was interesting to me Dan watching the dueling
Speaker 3: narratives transpiring as the usual broadcast position.
Speaker 4: Here at six point thirty k on denvery.
Speaker 3: Of CNN on the left, TV and Fox News on
Speaker 3: the right, and how CNN was doing its level best
Speaker 3: to avoid anything related to the coverage of Telsey Gabbard
Speaker 3: at that press conference, how convincing she was, how credible
Speaker 3: she was.
Speaker 4: And we've had a cut of Jim Scudo cutting away.
Speaker 3: From her on CNN because it was doing too much
Speaker 3: damage I think out in the airwaves there. So there
Speaker 3: was that versus what Fox News was covering. And again
Speaker 3: there's a dichotomy there.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: No, And the reason I sent that cut is because CNN,
Speaker 1: so much of the media was part of this really
Speaker 1: evil conspiracy, and you know me, I don't use the
Speaker 1: word evil that much.
Speaker 2: This was evil and they were CNN was a.
Speaker 1: Big part of this evil conspiracy because there was no
Speaker 1: evidence whatsoever of Donald Trump and Russia colluding. And that's
Speaker 1: why it all fell apart, right, there was no evidence whatsoever.
Speaker 1: Nobody was ever able to hand the media the type
Speaker 1: of evidence it should require before the media.
Speaker 2: Went along with this coup attempt.
Speaker 1: So yeah, so that's why CNN cut away, because you know,
Speaker 1: if you knew where you were going to die, you
Speaker 1: wouldn't go there, right, Peter Boyle's old line.
Speaker 2: So we'll come back and cover that. I did want
Speaker 2: to give it up, Dick.
Speaker 1: Ryan, because I know you could not sleep last night
Speaker 1: as I could not either over the injured deer that
Speaker 1: we talked about at the end of the show yesterday.
Speaker 2: And thank you to everybody who has great expertise in
Speaker 2: that area.
Speaker 1: Which I do not as a kid who grew up
Speaker 1: in Chicago and then you know urban areas of Colorado.
Speaker 1: But this injured deer clearly one leg, just being dragged along,
Speaker 1: not functioning in any way. And I was talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, I couldn't reach wildlife, and you know if
Speaker 1: the deer was in great misery, is there a legal
Speaker 1: way to put it down, et cetera.
Speaker 2: Here's the development. Here's the development.
Speaker 1: I went looking for the deer this morning, couldn't find
Speaker 1: it last night, went looking for it this morning.
Speaker 2: It has three baby deer. It has three very very small.
Speaker 1: Obviously newborn baby deer, so very important. I think that
Speaker 1: it's stay alive. So anyway, I'll update you further on that.
Speaker 1: But that's the newest development. Three or three seven, one,
Speaker 1: three eight, two five five. When we come back, we'll
Speaker 1: take you into some of the factual revelations today, and
Speaker 1: they're very significant, not because they're going to lead to
Speaker 1: to a charge against Obama. They aren't, but they do
Speaker 1: reveal very evil conduct. We all need to know about this.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dankapla Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 5: Multiple intelligence community assessments released in the months leading up
Speaker 5: to the November twenty sixteen election concluded that Russia had
Speaker 5: neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of
Speaker 5: the US election. On December fifth.
Speaker 6: We've been listening there to the Director of National Collegence,
Speaker 6: Tulsey Gabbard, continuing on what has now been a multi
Speaker 6: day effort not only with public statements like this, but
Speaker 6: release of documents to attempt to back up the quite
Speaker 6: extreme allegation that President Obama is guilty of treason and
Speaker 6: that he worked in some sort of conspiracy with Hillary Clinton, etc.
Speaker 6: In the assessment by the intelligence community at the time
Speaker 6: that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election.
Speaker 1: But the reason he does that, right is because CNN
Speaker 1: was part of this and this is all being documented now.
Speaker 1: So of course they cut her off because she is
Speaker 1: proving their guilt, not in a criminal sense. And this
Speaker 1: is where I wish the administration hadn't gone there, because
Speaker 1: when they talk about Obama guilty of trees and etc.
Speaker 1: Then people expect a criminal prosecution of Barack Obama. Right
Speaker 1: that ain't going to happen. Doesn't mean Obama didn't do
Speaker 1: evil things. He did extraordinarily evil things we are now
Speaker 1: learning in this time period that kicks in around December
Speaker 1: ninth of sixteen. And what it all boils down to
Speaker 1: him We're about to play sound from the from the
Speaker 1: dn I.
Speaker 2: But what it boils down.
Speaker 1: To is is the overwhelming, the overwhelming evidence flowing into
Speaker 1: our intelligence agencies was that Russia had not colluded with
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Donald Trump had not colluded with Russia. That
Speaker 1: was the overwhelming evidence, because it didn't happen. It didn't
Speaker 1: That's why there is an evidence of it happening. It
Speaker 1: didn't happen. So the overwhelming evidence and lean of the
Speaker 1: intelligence agencies was there wasn't any collusion. In addition to that,
Speaker 1: the overwhelming lean of the intelligence agencies was that Russia
Speaker 1: had not been effective in meddling the election.
Speaker 2: Russia medals in every election.
Speaker 1: And then the question is are they meddling now to
Speaker 1: try to help Hillary Clinton? Are they meddling to try
Speaker 1: to weaken Hillary Clinton? But there was because obviously Russia
Speaker 1: expected Hillary Clinton to win the election. Everybody except expected
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump maybe expected Hillary Clinton to win
Speaker 1: the election. Go back to election day sixteen. Listen to
Speaker 1: my radio show. I think I was the only guy
Speaker 1: on air saying Donald Trump was going to win.
Speaker 2: But the point is, the.
Speaker 1: Intelligence agencies at that point it knew there was no collusion,
Speaker 1: that there was no reason to believe Russia had any
Speaker 1: impact on that election. And so what happens then? Then
Speaker 1: you get to December ninth that's why it's such a
Speaker 1: key date. And then as the intelligence agencies are about
Speaker 1: to roll in with a report concluding what I just
Speaker 1: told you, at least in part, Barack Obama stops him
Speaker 1: and he reverses their course, and he now directs that
Speaker 1: there be a reassessment. And from everything I've seen and heard,
Speaker 1: and you can listen to Tulsea Gabbertt for yourself, he
Speaker 1: then makes it clear what he wants, which is he
Speaker 1: wants conclusions that there there was heavy Russian involvement that mattered.
Speaker 1: He directs all indications to me are that. Obama then
Speaker 1: steps in and makes it clear he wants he wants
Speaker 1: findings that go in the direction of collusion with Trump.
Speaker 2: And then what.
Speaker 1: Happens at that same time, the White House leaks to
Speaker 1: these friendly major media outlets about collusion between Trump and Russia,
Speaker 1: knowing there's no evidence there was any. That's what's so
Speaker 1: evil in part. But let's dive into what Telsea Gabbert
Speaker 1: had to say. Cut sixth place, do.
Speaker 7: You believe that any of this new information implicates former
Speaker 7: President Obama and criminal behavior?
Speaker 5: We have referred and will continue to refer all of
Speaker 5: these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI
Speaker 5: to investigate the criminal implications of this. For even the
Speaker 5: evidence of correct the evidence that we have found and
Speaker 5: that we have released directly point to President Obama leading
Speaker 5: the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces
Speaker 5: of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.
Speaker 2: Yes, no, that's right, and she's right about that.
Speaker 1: She's right about that, and that's what goes to the
Speaker 1: evil here and the great evil harm to Trump in America.
Speaker 1: But that doesn't equal criminal charges. Okay, cut seven place.
Speaker 8: The president yesterday you've inferred as the former president helpingly
Speaker 8: to coup. Based on what you now see, you believe
Speaker 8: President Obama is guilty of treason.
Speaker 5: I'm leaving the criminal charges to the Department of Justice.
Speaker 5: I am not an attorney, but as I've said previously,
Speaker 5: when you look at the intent behind creating a fake,
Speaker 5: manufactured intelligence document that directly contradicts multiple assessments that were
Speaker 5: created by the intelligence community, the expressed intent and what
Speaker 5: followed afterward can only be described as a year's long
Speaker 5: coup and a treason. This conspiracy against the American people
Speaker 5: are republic and an attempt to undermine President Trump's administration.
Speaker 1: And this is where, And Tulca Gabbert said, listen, she's
Speaker 1: not the lawyer she's referring to doj et cetera. But
Speaker 1: here's the point. Treason there is. This evil behavior was
Speaker 1: in no way, shape or form treason. It doesn't fit
Speaker 1: those elements. I understand why on a human level, a
Speaker 1: moral level, that people like me would see it as
Speaker 1: Morally treason is sure, but legally not even close. We've
Speaker 1: been through it on the show before a day or
Speaker 1: two ago. Treason is a very precise definition that this
Speaker 1: doesn't come close to fitting because this behavior, that this
Speaker 1: what I view as evil behavior, is not intended to
Speaker 1: aid an enemy. You are not betraying your nation to
Speaker 1: aid another enemy. And so now, if criminal charges were
Speaker 1: to be brought here, and again I'm predicting they won't
Speaker 1: be brought against Obama, it would be a different type
Speaker 1: of charge. It would be a seditious conspiracy kind of charge,
Speaker 1: you know, where you're then engaging in criminal behavior to
Speaker 1: undermine the government. But this treason thing, yeah, morally I
Speaker 1: get it, and I feel the same way toward it.
Speaker 1: Legally not even close, and I think it's just confusing people. Hey,
Speaker 1: we'll come back and get into some of the more
Speaker 1: detail that was offered by the D and I today,
Speaker 1: and it's very important stuff for the reasons we've discussed.
Speaker 1: And it all boils down to from everything I've seen
Speaker 1: so far, I believe she's right and the administration's right.
Speaker 1: It boils down to the intelligence community looking at this
Speaker 1: and not that there's not collusion between Russia and Trump,
Speaker 1: looking at this and saying, doesn't look like Russia had
Speaker 1: any significant impact on our election, and then Obama directing
Speaker 1: that the I see the intelligence community duel one point
Speaker 1: eighty and start emphasizing Russia, Russia, Russia, and that's where
Speaker 1: this whole Russia hoax was born, and then leaking to
Speaker 1: the media and the media starts to run with it.
Speaker 1: In my mind, if that happened in the evidence I'm
Speaker 1: seeing all publicly reported is correct, that's just flat evil.
Speaker 1: So what do you think of all of this? What
Speaker 1: do you think should happen next? Three or three seven,
Speaker 1: one three eight two five five text DN five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine.
Speaker 2: Do you think I'm wrong?
Speaker 1: Do you think there's grounds here to charge President Obama
Speaker 1: with the crime? Do you think that people close to
Speaker 1: in in the intelligence community made the sort of mistakes
Speaker 1: that have exposed them to criminal exposure or was it
Speaker 1: just flat evil? You're on the Dan Captain.
Speaker 4: Show, you're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 5: Do you or the White House believe that the Supreme
Speaker 5: Court's community decision protects Obama from prosecution.
Speaker 7: But I can speak to the President's feelings on this matter.
Speaker 7: He spoke to all of you yesterday in the Oval Office,
Speaker 7: but I also spoke to him about this this morning,
Speaker 7: and he wants to see all those who perpetuated this
Speaker 7: fraud against our country, who betrayed our country and the constitution,
Speaker 7: to be thoroughly investigated and held accountable. And it's been
Speaker 7: ten years of this and I would just add, based
Speaker 7: on everything the Director has said and declassified, all of
Speaker 7: you in this room should go through it and take
Speaker 7: a look at this report and review the intelligence because
Speaker 7: unfortunately that hasn't happened. And many of the people who
Speaker 7: perpetuated this hoax, Clapper, Andy McCabe, James Comy, and many
Speaker 7: others have been hired by major networks in this room
Speaker 7: to go on television and continue to spew these lies,
Speaker 7: knowing that they are lies.
Speaker 1: Now listen to the word that Caroline Lovett used, and
Speaker 1: I think she's brilliant, by the way, one of the
Speaker 1: best ever. And I agree when she says fraud. I
Speaker 1: agree when she says betray country. I agree when she
Speaker 1: says betray the constitution. That doesn't mean it equals a
Speaker 1: prosecutable crime. And I'll break that down in a second.
Speaker 1: But the words she used when she named them by name, right, Clapper,
Speaker 1: call me, et cetera, the words she used wasn't crime.
Speaker 2: It was hoax.
Speaker 1: And that was intentional, right, Because I think the administration
Speaker 1: knows that these people who did such evil, and they
Speaker 1: had evil intentions and evil actions, and they did an
Speaker 1: enormous amount of harm. It's almost biblical, if not biblical,
Speaker 1: that President Trump was able to overcome all of that,
Speaker 1: which has served this country greatly. But it doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that equal criminal conduct.
Speaker 2: And remember all these people who were doing this evil.
Speaker 1: These are very smart, experienced people with legions of publicly
Speaker 1: paid lawyers advising them. You know, do we really think
Speaker 1: that they were going to miscalculate and fall on the
Speaker 1: wrong side of the criminal prosecution line.
Speaker 2: I don't think so, But particularly when they have so.
Speaker 1: Much room to operate on the other side of that line,
Speaker 1: because there's this entire lane when you're in those high
Speaker 1: government offices, there's this entire lane of evil you can
Speaker 1: wallow in, you can travel in, you can bathe in,
Speaker 1: you can live in without it being criminal. And that's
Speaker 1: what they were doing. That's what they were doing. And
Speaker 1: the reason that so much of that lane doesn't have
Speaker 1: an applicable criminal charge is because government has to be
Speaker 1: able to function right without constant criminal prosecution of political opponents.
Speaker 1: And so between statutory law, which is you know, is
Speaker 1: what the legislature in Congress rights at the federal level,
Speaker 1: and case law, you know, the law handed down by
Speaker 1: judges and opinions, this big lane has developed. And I
Speaker 1: think that's the lane that these people were operating in
Speaker 1: to do their evil. And yeah, and trust, I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about any individual case. I'm just telling
Speaker 1: you I've spent forty years litigating high stake civil cases,
Speaker 1: often against very big corporations, and you know, so.
Speaker 2: I've seen it a thousand times.
Speaker 1: You get people in these high positions and they know
Speaker 1: how to walk that line where they can do some
Speaker 1: very bad things. And in my world, the civil meaning
Speaker 1: money damages world. Then yeah, it'll expose the corporation to
Speaker 1: money damages. But sometimes you get corporations that do that
Speaker 1: calculus and say, you know what, Okay, we'll pay some claims,
Speaker 1: we'll do this bad stuff, but we'll still end up
Speaker 1: way ahead because we'll save or make a lot of
Speaker 1: money doing these bad things that happens sometimes not all
Speaker 1: the time. But on the criminal side, give me a break.
Speaker 1: These people at these high levels, with all those lawyers,
Speaker 1: they are very, very careful to stay on the right
Speaker 1: side of the criminal line.
Speaker 2: And I'm so slipover.
Speaker 1: But to sit here and think that any of this
Speaker 1: bunch who sat down and did this premeditated evil to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in America. No, So let's continue to talk
Speaker 1: about the evil because because American in the world needs
Speaker 1: to know what these people did. So all right, let's
Speaker 1: get to some more of this tulsy gabbered sound. Please, Ryan,
Speaker 1: let's kick it in with seven. Please cut seven.
Speaker 8: President yesterday levinferred to the former president help Ley to
Speaker 8: coop based on what you now see, you believe President
Speaker 8: Obama is guilty of treason.
Speaker 5: I'm leaving the criminal charges to the Department of Justice.
Speaker 5: I'm not an attorney, but as I've said previously, when
Speaker 5: you look at the intent behind creating a fake, manufactured
Speaker 5: intelligence docum that directly contradicts multiple assessments that were created
Speaker 5: by the intelligence community, the expressed intent and what followed
Speaker 5: afterward can only be described as a year's long coup.
Speaker 5: And the trees in this conspiracy against the American people
Speaker 5: are republic and an attempt to undermine President Trump's administration.
Speaker 2: Now let's go to the phone lines. On a moral level, yes,
Speaker 2: I agree.
Speaker 1: This, This was treason on a moral level, not even
Speaker 1: close on a legal level. If there is a criminally
Speaker 1: prosecutable event, it's it's not the crime of treason that's
Speaker 1: so narrowly defined.
Speaker 2: Mike and Eerie. You're on the Dan Kapla Show. How
Speaker 2: you doing?
Speaker 9: Eerie doing great?
Speaker 1: Dan?
Speaker 9: How are you?
Speaker 2: I am living the dream?
Speaker 9: Good. I'm glad to hear it. Hey, here's a time there.
Speaker 9: I just I can't, I couldn't help, but just want
Speaker 9: to learn more about it. The biblical a biblical hoax?
Speaker 9: What does it take to be a biblical hoax? I'm curious.
Speaker 2: I'd love to know, because I've never used that phrase.
Speaker 2: Oh you did, I didn't.
Speaker 9: Your secretary said that but that's the phrase you use.
Speaker 9: The secretary said that.
Speaker 2: So and so now trying to get Kelly upset.
Speaker 1: Mike, I think what we should do, you know, every
Speaker 1: now and then we do a gofund me on this show.
Speaker 1: I think we should do a GoFundMe to get you
Speaker 1: hearing aids.
Speaker 9: Yeah, I have a hearing aid.
Speaker 2: Get a new battery.
Speaker 9: But but I don't have a problem with comprehension, Dan,
Speaker 9: And that's your issue is that you are you are
Speaker 9: really really toeing the line here to support the come
Speaker 9: over and chief. It's just amazing to me your willingness
Speaker 9: suggest I mean, you talk about truth, but people don't
Speaker 9: really care about the truth to you, Well.
Speaker 1: That's ironic from a guy who started the call with
Speaker 1: a false premise. But but Mike, seriously, I'll buy the
Speaker 1: new battery for your hearing aids.
Speaker 2: I never used that phrase. But let let me recommend
Speaker 2: one thing to.
Speaker 1: Know. Why are you picking on Kelly trying to get
Speaker 1: Kelly angry by calling her.
Speaker 2: My secretary after the after.
Speaker 9: The term that you use, she answers the phone. Is
Speaker 9: this your secretary? She answers your phone.
Speaker 2: Mike, I'm starting to worry about you.
Speaker 1: Can I can I offer you one word of advice,
Speaker 1: and that is have you heard of Have you heard
Speaker 1: of Tony Robbins?
Speaker 2: Have you heard of Tony Robbins?
Speaker 1: I have Okay, Now, Tony Robbins has this great He
Speaker 1: has this great concept called living in a Beautiful state
Speaker 1: and you can google it up Tony Robbin's beautiful state.
Speaker 1: Because you live in such an angry state that it
Speaker 1: it interferes with your ability even to hear and comprehend.
Speaker 9: Dan, I think you misunderstand my frustration with you when
Speaker 9: you you you never get angry. You keep that little
Speaker 9: asseminate voice that you have, which is great. I'm appreciated,
Speaker 9: appreciative of that. But you kind of like just poke
Speaker 9: and poke and poke is to get other people angry
Speaker 9: with your little spind wish you have, I get it
Speaker 9: or anything like that. But I know you are as
Speaker 9: you are a seminist. So there you go.
Speaker 2: How about this, Mike, how about this? How much money
Speaker 2: do you? How much money do you have?
Speaker 9: What to bet you?
Speaker 2: Yeah, here's what I got, I got here, here's what.
Speaker 9: I got I got I got before.
Speaker 2: Here's the bet.
Speaker 1: Ten thousand dollars, ten thousand dollars we get, we get
Speaker 1: in the ring together for charity, and whoever is able to,
Speaker 1: whoever is able to walk out of that ring, gets
Speaker 1: to decide which charity the money goes to.
Speaker 2: How about that?
Speaker 9: I like it, that's all.
Speaker 2: Let's do it. How much do you want it to be?
Speaker 2: How much do you want it to be?
Speaker 9: You tell you, hey, you're the one throwing down the bombs.
Speaker 9: I mean, how much do you wait? By the way,
Speaker 9: because I.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, okay, I wigh enough to I wigh enough
Speaker 1: to take down eerie Mike two twenty five lovely. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so let's set up the match. Let's set up the match,
Speaker 1: and then I can show you how d Yeah okay, well, hey,
Speaker 1: don't don't get off the line. Don't get off the line.
Speaker 1: Just stay on the line. I'll talk to Kelly. We'll
Speaker 1: make the Orange man send.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 9: Yeah, I love it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, Mike, Well we'll see how much you love it? Yeah?
Speaker 2: Holy cow, Kelly, would you talk to Mike. Let's let's
Speaker 2: get that set up. Yeah, PC's what she is working
Speaker 2: on that as we say, good, good, wonderful, wonderful. What
Speaker 2: makes a person that angry?
Speaker 4: That was rare for him, even Forie.
Speaker 2: Mike's Yeah, yeah, I'm worried about him.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I am now too.
Speaker 1: Before it was like the hearing aid is fritzed out
Speaker 1: and he's got some tenatus that's driving him crazy.
Speaker 4: I mean, which one is?
Speaker 1: You know? I hear it said both ways. I'll say
Speaker 1: it two different ways in the same sentence.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So we'll come back and hopefully we'll have the detales
Speaker 1: all set up for this for this sad end to Mike,
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 5: At President Trump's direction and with the support and coordination
Speaker 5: with the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, today we've
Speaker 5: released a declassified oversight Majority staff report that was produced
Speaker 5: in September of twenty twenty. The stunning revelations that we
Speaker 5: are releasing today should be of concern to every American.
Speaker 5: This is not about Democrats or Republicans. This has to
Speaker 5: do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic and American
Speaker 5: voters having faith that the votes cast will count. There
Speaker 5: is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his
Speaker 5: national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community
Speaker 5: assessment that they knew was false. They knew I would
Speaker 5: promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty
Speaker 5: sixteen election to help President Trump win, selling it to
Speaker 5: the American people as though it were true.
Speaker 4: It wasn't.
Speaker 2: See.
Speaker 1: I believe everything she just said is true, and it
Speaker 1: is a scandal of the highest order. It is evil,
Speaker 1: public evil of the highest order, and every American needs
Speaker 1: to know about it. But for those people out there
Speaker 1: expecting there to be criminal charges, please don't get your
Speaker 1: hopes up. For the reasons we've talked about earlier. There's
Speaker 1: all sorts of evil that can be done at the
Speaker 1: highest levels of government that cannot be prosecuted as criminal.
Speaker 1: And I believe these actors who committed this evil were
Speaker 1: probably very, very careful to stay just on the other
Speaker 1: side of the prosecutable line. Three or three se one
Speaker 1: three eight, two five five the number text d an
Speaker 1: five seven seven, three nine. Doesn't make it any less
Speaker 1: important that we get the full truth out there because
Speaker 1: this was a coup attempt.
Speaker 2: I was one of the few on air scene that
Speaker 2: at the time.
Speaker 1: So Ryan, I understand you have some additional information from
Speaker 1: our disturbed caller.
Speaker 3: Yeah, some breaking news. Eerie Mike has chosen a charity
Speaker 3: for the boxing match that you've proposed, and it is
Speaker 3: Planned Parenthood.
Speaker 1: Why does it not surprise me that he would want
Speaker 1: to use charitable dollars to kill innocent children?
Speaker 2: Why does that not surprise me?
Speaker 4: Well, that's an open trol of you personally, of course.
Speaker 1: Well, and listen, bottom line is you could put a
Speaker 1: gun to my head and I would not give a
Speaker 1: dollar to Planned Parenthood. Would never happen, would never happen.
Speaker 1: So yeah, three all three seven one three eight two
Speaker 1: five five the number text d A N five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine. That's his way of getting out of
Speaker 1: the fight.
Speaker 2: So yeah, all.
Speaker 1: Righty texter, Dan, please tell Erie Mike Kelly's title is
Speaker 1: associate producer.
Speaker 4: What a jerk?
Speaker 1: That from Alexa and I corrected him multiple times, but
Speaker 1: of course all he wanted to do on that call
Speaker 1: was misrepresent and bait. And you know, hey, I'm right here.
Speaker 1: You know you know where to find me. Don't go
Speaker 1: after Kelly. Holy cow, Dan, make it fifty grand. I
Speaker 1: will beat your blank that from Oh that's probably for
Speaker 1: Mary Mike. Right, Okay, Dan, I'll take that bet and
Speaker 1: hire said some guy named D. C.
Speaker 2: Lawyer says, so well, I'll fight them both at once.
Speaker 2: All righty, glad you're here.
Speaker 1: Let's get to some more of this tulsy Gabbard stuff
Speaker 1: because it's really important.
Speaker 2: Next cut nine, please.
Speaker 5: John Brennan lied, and he denied using this dossier in
Speaker 5: this intelligence assessment that President Obama ordered because he knew
Speaker 5: it was discredited, it was a politically motivated manufactured document.
Speaker 5: He directed senior CIA officials to use it anyway. CIA
Speaker 5: officer told the House Intelligence Committee staff as they investigated
Speaker 5: this quote, the director of the CIA, John Brennan, refused
Speaker 5: to remove it, and, when confronted with the dossier's many flaws, responded, quote, yes,
Speaker 5: but doesn't it ring true?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: And again the harm was done right to Trump and
Speaker 1: the nation if they think if they had succeeded, this
Speaker 1: was a flat out coup attempt. Now, what they did
Speaker 1: succeed in doing was dramatically limiting what President Trump could
Speaker 1: accomplish in his first term. And who paid the price
Speaker 1: for that, America. Because Trump had a very successful first
Speaker 1: term by traditional measures.
Speaker 2: But we're seeing right now what.
Speaker 1: This man is able to accomplish as president when he's
Speaker 1: not up against an ongoing coup attempt fueled by a
Speaker 1: flat out false, dishonest, intentionally dishonest intelligence community reports.
Speaker 2: So yeah, now think.
Speaker 1: About what might have been if Trump had been able
Speaker 1: to have a full presidency.
Speaker 2: Now we know COVID came at the end, right, and
Speaker 2: we know that.
Speaker 1: That put a crimp in thing pretty significant, But think
Speaker 1: about what that first term would have been. Like, I
Speaker 1: guess that the silver lining is that now we get
Speaker 1: these staggered terms and he's had four years to think
Speaker 1: about what he would do a second time around. And
Speaker 1: you can see how America's benefiting from that. Three oh
Speaker 1: three seven one three eight two five five text d
Speaker 1: an five seven seven three nine. As we get to
Speaker 1: more of this dance. As a Texter, it's the same
Speaker 1: old No one will be prosecuted, no one will go
Speaker 1: to jail. And also no one on the left is
Speaker 1: going to change their mind. They will think it is
Speaker 1: literally trumped up charges. First of all, certainly, one hundred
Speaker 1: percent certainty Barack Obama is not going to be charged
Speaker 1: and convicted of any kind of crime. Not going to happen.
Speaker 1: I think he did evil, but he's like a lot
Speaker 1: of people who do evil. He's intellectually gifted, and I
Speaker 1: think he was very careful to stay on the right
Speaker 1: side of the legal line. And he's got this presidential
Speaker 1: immunity ruling going from as well. People in his inner circle.
Speaker 1: I think they were probably very careful to stay on
Speaker 1: the right side of the legal line. But maybe there's
Speaker 1: an exception here, you know, for perjury. I know that
Speaker 1: Tulsea Gabbert you just heard it, took this very direct
Speaker 1: shot at Brennan, you know, saying that he had lied,
Speaker 1: and you know there's a lot of testimony given under oath,
Speaker 1: so maybe there's some opening for perjury. But then you
Speaker 1: run into statute of limitations as well. My point is
Speaker 1: whether or not criminal charges are possible, and I'm saying,
Speaker 1: don't hold your breath.
Speaker 2: It's still evil, it still has to be exposed.
Speaker 1: And yes, the left isn't going to change their mind,
Speaker 1: but you just have to educate a few people in
Speaker 1: the middle and it changes everything.