Speaker 1: Good morning everyone. How are you today?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 1: Diego Dwayne, give me one second. I just got to
Speaker 1: say this real quick, and I'll get you on this throw.
Speaker 1: Does anybody ever see office space? I hope so, because
Speaker 1: this will make no sense if you haven't. It's not
Speaker 1: that I'm lazy, Bob. It's that I just don't care.
Speaker 1: I have eight bosses, Bob. When I make a mistake,
Speaker 1: I've got eight people come in to my desk to
Speaker 1: let me know about it. Yesterday, I thirty seconds after
Speaker 1: I said, wasn't that singer in the Velvet under Ground
Speaker 1: also named Ido? Thirty seconds afterward, I said, Nope, that
Speaker 1: was some other person. I had so many emails telling
Speaker 1: me that I stop. All right, So now that's out
Speaker 1: of the way, let's get into it. Hello morning. Let
Speaker 1: me see if I can just bully up to the
Speaker 1: screen later. And what's up, buddy?
Speaker 3: Check check one too? Can you hear me?
Speaker 1: You sound great to me?
Speaker 3: Awesome?
Speaker 1: And uh, just so you know, since we're solving mysteries
Speaker 1: to day, I got my Scooby Doo shirt on.
Speaker 3: All right. We would have gotten away with it if
Speaker 3: it weren't for those meddling kids. Yes, and we are
Speaker 3: those meddling kids this morning. Is that crazy crime with you, Daniel, Yes,
Speaker 3: yes it is. Thank you.
Speaker 1: For those of you out there. Can let me just
Speaker 1: remind you real quick, give me one second, Jane, I
Speaker 1: will fix that other thing that I just saw your
Speaker 1: email about too. I missed an e but let me
Speaker 1: go ahead and I'll take.
Speaker 3: Care of that.
Speaker 1: But let me just wep me show you guys real quick.
Speaker 1: So today at around eight twenty pm in Pacific time,
Speaker 1: I'm going to be forty five guys. That's insane. But
Speaker 1: just so you know, another way to get the goal
Speaker 1: for the computer is to click this little guy right there.
Speaker 1: All right, it's just like a super Chat's pretty cool
Speaker 1: that Rumble seems to have their own and that becomes
Speaker 1: a If that becomes a trend, that'd be pretty cool too.
Speaker 1: And the one right next to it is the subscribe button,
Speaker 1: and it's kind of like a Patreon, believe it or not,
Speaker 1: and that would be a monthly thing at five. So
Speaker 1: those are in there as well as the gifts and
Speaker 1: go that goes directly to the campaign for the computer.
Speaker 1: All right, now that that's out of the way, cool,
Speaker 1: let's go to it. Man. You need some screens to share. Hey,
Speaker 1: thank you, Happy birthday to me, he says, and then
Speaker 1: Colleen says, happy birthday. Hope you got the book you on.
Speaker 3: I haven't.
Speaker 1: I haven't found it yet, but I hope.
Speaker 3: So I hope it comes your birthday.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm gonna be forty five about I think my
Speaker 1: mother had me at like eleven twenty pm Eastern time,
Speaker 1: so it would be eight o'clock here, my daughter, like,
Speaker 1: I remember the exact time. It was five five pm. Yeah, uh,
Speaker 1: thank you Frize. Oh no, I think we lost the internets.
Speaker 1: This happens on the deep Share pack. I asked a
Speaker 1: couple of times. So hopefully it comes back.
Speaker 3: There we go. All right, you got me now, yep.
Speaker 1: You are moving again. Sweetures beginning.
Speaker 3: So it's your birthday today? Yes, nice, I didn't hear you.
Speaker 3: You said something about you being born at eleven something
Speaker 3: or other.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah, eleven twenty pm Eastern and I think it
Speaker 1: was if I remember correctly my mom's story. I was there,
Speaker 1: but I wasn't really paying attention at the time.
Speaker 3: Yeah, right right. I was born in the middle of
Speaker 3: the night, my mom tells me. Yeah, sometime early morning.
Speaker 1: My mom said it was like after eight hours of labor,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, are you just trying to make me
Speaker 1: feel bad about something else, because you do that a lot.
Speaker 3: Oh half birthday man.
Speaker 1: Thanks buddy. All right, so we got lots of things
Speaker 1: that talk about. We've got Yeah, Nico demis on the
Speaker 1: on the ground on location finding out some stuff that
Speaker 1: was pretty cool. He went to the Brandeis Library, got
Speaker 1: you like, I think he probably took a picture of
Speaker 1: an entire book because they went to microfiche for him.
Speaker 1: It was interesting.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure how much of all of that we
Speaker 3: want to reveal at this point, because still gathering. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and we're still gathering, and we're already running into issues
Speaker 3: uh four or four errors or whatever they are, and
Speaker 3: workers that aren't there, employees that aren't there, machines that
Speaker 3: aren't working anymore, out of order all of a sudden.
Speaker 1: So oh, so he went back a second time since
Speaker 1: he talked to me then because I know he was
Speaker 1: there the other day. So then he went back and
Speaker 1: there was all of a sudden he couldn't get to stuff. Fun.
Speaker 3: No, No, that was the first visit. Well, the second visit,
Speaker 3: you were there months ago, just to sort of do
Speaker 3: a recon right, right, But things have changed since then,
Speaker 3: and so I think it's all going to be okay.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the actual person who handles the American Freeze wasn't
Speaker 1: there that day, so they said.
Speaker 3: Right, And so I don't know. I found it amazing.
Speaker 3: I mean, we could talk about this all day long,
Speaker 3: just how amazing that is, but I really would rather
Speaker 3: keep that kind of on the down low for now. Yep. So, yeah,
Speaker 3: we definitely got boots on the ground and there are
Speaker 3: people out there doing things and contacting both of us,
Speaker 3: I'm sure.
Speaker 1: And the reason that he can be more successful in
Speaker 1: his next run is what you're saying, right, So it's
Speaker 1: not too public, yes, yes.
Speaker 3: Well, because you know, we're starting to see, as we
Speaker 3: are showing the last couple of Wednesdays, that this idea
Speaker 3: of Frankism is kind of into the mainstream lexicon. So
Speaker 3: I could see them circling the wagons pretty quick if
Speaker 3: they if they started to see that we were getting
Speaker 3: catching on to Brande's right.
Speaker 1: That's because I mean, like that's the lynchpin the way
Speaker 1: we look at it. Yeah, a lot of things happened
Speaker 1: in this world.
Speaker 3: He's a key guy. This is why we call him
Speaker 3: the maker of our modern day social contract. And so
Speaker 3: I also want to say that you know, you and
Speaker 3: I haven't talked this week at all about what we
Speaker 3: were going to do. What I thought last night and
Speaker 3: this morning when I was preparing without seeing your email,
Speaker 3: that I wanted to talk about how we got here? Yeah,
Speaker 3: because this is what that's that's what I named the show, Yeah, right, right,
Speaker 3: this is When I saw that this morning, I was like.
Speaker 1: Of course we're on thength friend.
Speaker 3: What's his name, Beck, the guy that we've been Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: he says that in that uh scientific management episode, And
Speaker 3: we're going to go back there because there's some more
Speaker 3: key quotes we're going to pull out of there because
Speaker 3: we want to show how we got here. This is
Speaker 3: how Bulletproof started to begin with right and we I
Speaker 3: thought that that was the first logical question that everybody
Speaker 3: awakening should be asking themselves.
Speaker 1: How did we get right? And just for people out there,
Speaker 1: if you want to follow along right directly on the website,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure or if you're got the ability to
Speaker 1: do so or not, but bulletproof hub dot com all right,
Speaker 1: and there's links there for videos other than ours, like
Speaker 1: there's the deep Share podcast where I think it's like
Speaker 1: twelve episodes or ten episodes where he was on. And
Speaker 1: there's another one called what heck is it missing?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Physical?
Speaker 3: Is it visible there for you now? It is?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Okay. So I just want to show you something because
Speaker 3: I'm saying all of this this morning. So there's the
Speaker 3: Rise of the Expert Series.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 3: So it's a ten part series on how we got here.
Speaker 3: This explains everything. When you're done with that ten part
Speaker 3: series and you have a knowledge of how we got here,
Speaker 3: you're going to see this world in a completely different
Speaker 3: way and as close to reality as there is. And
Speaker 3: then we did a podcast for each article with my
Speaker 3: very good friend Andy Ross at the Deep Share and
Speaker 3: we're working on thinking about spitballing future projects too. We're
Speaker 3: just not sure which direction we want to go. So
Speaker 3: then I've I've been on the Missing Link several times.
Speaker 3: We've also gone over all of those articles. They came
Speaker 3: and dropped in on me. I don't know if I
Speaker 3: told you this, but they came in.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's at the farm.
Speaker 3: It was really an amazing meeting. And then Forbidden Knowledge News,
Speaker 3: we've been on there four times, kind of talking.
Speaker 1: About the show. Okay, because it has maybe that was
Speaker 1: something that you wrote as like an article.
Speaker 3: That's with another friend of mine, Chris Matthew. So I
Speaker 3: just was doing all of these interviews that kind of
Speaker 3: at the same time, and then I've got you our
Speaker 3: interviews here with Bolbusters. Now at the bottom you can.
Speaker 1: That was that that you just recently added right those
Speaker 1: links within the last hour. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Cool. I wanted to come here up to and ready
Speaker 3: so that people can actually click on and everything that's
Speaker 3: available to them.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And so we've been covering the Scientific Management article part
Speaker 3: two and I think we're pretty much through that right.
Speaker 1: Uh. Yeah, I think I think there may have been
Speaker 1: more things we might have been considering adding to it,
Speaker 1: just to spice up the details. Yeah, Like the Abraham
Speaker 1: Flexner thing is something I'd like to address if we
Speaker 1: ever get our overhead wrapped around that. But that and
Speaker 1: whether or not he was at any way integral in
Speaker 1: the whole Morgan though, because we know he was integral
Speaker 1: part of the whole creating of the Federal Reserve and
Speaker 1: making that pass and all that, So knowing that and
Speaker 1: knowing how it ties into all the a holes that
Speaker 1: went to Jackyl Island and all that too, Morgan Thaw.
Speaker 1: He made a quote apparently so so they say was
Speaker 1: to Wilson basically outlining because who hell does that anyway,
Speaker 1: but outlining to the to his co conspirator. I guess
Speaker 1: how they're going to put us in this pledging type
Speaker 1: of situation where we would become the collateral for this
Speaker 1: federal reserve and and and the debt. And it was
Speaker 1: pretty concise. And that's how this born into slavery situation
Speaker 1: that we have occurred, the minor estate and all the
Speaker 1: other stuff, and how it's kind of there's a lot
Speaker 1: of different ideas out there as to whether you know,
Speaker 1: sovereign this and that is a is a dead end
Speaker 1: or a trap, whether or not there's another way to
Speaker 1: do it. But how the hell do you get out
Speaker 1: of this? You know, this commercial contract, this commercial law,
Speaker 1: this maritime law, this Roman law, and how it dominates
Speaker 1: your life and how you become subjugated. You know, until
Speaker 1: you claim that minor state or dissolve it, you are
Speaker 1: still in the all caps, you're still a pitixiou sent
Speaker 1: the entity.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and how to opt out would be the first
Speaker 3: logical question after figuring out how we got here right right? Well,
Speaker 3: like this is a perfect step by step deductive way
Speaker 3: of realizing we've got an issue, taking responsibility for it,
Speaker 3: and then finding a way to you know, get out
Speaker 3: of it. And so we show through our work with
Speaker 3: the farm you can start to do and we've got
Speaker 3: friends out there doing this now that have been successful.
Speaker 3: You start a microgreen business for less than a thousand
Speaker 3: dollars and you can already have one foot out of
Speaker 3: the sick world and be selling microgreens making you know,
Speaker 3: two three four hundred dollars a week to start.
Speaker 1: So you're talking like actually like sprouted, Like are you
Speaker 1: talking like sprouted vegetables like sprouted broccoli, micro greens and
Speaker 1: stuff like that.
Speaker 3: Right, Microgreens is a it's it's a sort of a
Speaker 3: newer thing that's come along. I wouldn't say it's a
Speaker 3: fad or anything, because it's it's a very easy way
Speaker 3: to get veggiees, especially in the winter. So we did
Speaker 3: a micro green winter box. But yeah, so if anybody's
Speaker 3: trying to get out of this world, we're also showing,
Speaker 3: you know, solutions to get out of it, real life solutions.
Speaker 1: Right, how did we get here?
Speaker 3: Yeah? This one US Supreme Court justice and his cohorts,
Speaker 3: you know, are the makers of our modern day social contract,
Speaker 3: the literal matrix when you really understand what happened there,
Speaker 3: and then how the hell do we opt out of
Speaker 3: this is the next logical question. So we are actually
Speaker 3: persevering to talk more about that particular aspect what you
Speaker 3: just mentioned. The sovereignty of the individual. You know, sovereign
Speaker 3: citizen is kind of an oxymoron, right of course, beyond
Speaker 3: even that sort of thought process, and try to find
Speaker 3: a sovereignty for the rugged individual.
Speaker 1: I would say I had I had a PLEA officer
Speaker 1: one time asked me that because I was saying telling
Speaker 1: truth about how you know, he was trying to get
Speaker 1: me a shit about something, and I was like kind
Speaker 1: of firing back because I had been doing a lot
Speaker 1: of research and I had been getting screwed over my
Speaker 1: entire life by officers. And He's asked me, are you
Speaker 1: a sovereign citizen? And I'm like, and I just had
Speaker 1: nothing to say back. I'm like, I didn't even fucking
Speaker 1: ever consider that kind of crap before. And he's like,
Speaker 1: he's like, I'll oh rust you right now if you'm
Speaker 1: like I never said yes, you have pieces, you know,
Speaker 1: what I mean, Like, you can't even just not sign
Speaker 1: an a ticket because if they write refuse down there,
Speaker 1: that's your signature. It goes over the same fucking life.
Speaker 1: You have to actually write that. You you know, I
Speaker 1: forgot the verbiage. But on Sovereign Living, which don't let
Speaker 1: the name feel for you, he's not messed up in
Speaker 1: that sense of how to navigate Sovereign living on YouTube
Speaker 1: is a good channel to check out. He goes through it,
Speaker 1: he does. He has some really messed up views of
Speaker 1: you know, Trump the Savior. Unfortunately, still I don't know
Speaker 1: how logical man who worked on airplanes and aircraft and
Speaker 1: is that smart they still have this blind spot when
Speaker 1: it comes to things.
Speaker 3: It's like, yeah, well, most most people are compartmentalized. They're
Speaker 3: institutionalized literally, right, They're in an institution, so they're not
Speaker 3: gonna be able to see things. They're gonna have a
Speaker 3: knowledge shadow, just like we have rain shadows in nature.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I would think though, if you if
Speaker 1: you know the system itself, you would know the traps
Speaker 1: and you would know that it wouldn't be for the
Speaker 1: present to fix in the first place. You know, it's
Speaker 1: not how you would fix a system that the system
Speaker 1: itself is what needs to go. You know, why would
Speaker 1: you still try to work within it and think that
Speaker 1: you have this you know, this guy to come in
Speaker 1: and take it all down. I mean he goes into
Speaker 1: the hole. You know, three generals showed up and asked
Speaker 1: him to become It was like shot up the cuman
Speaker 1: on ship, you know. But everything else says, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's pretty it's pretty logical, and it makes sense and
Speaker 1: it checks out, and he knows all the titles and
Speaker 1: all that stuff when it comes to the law.
Speaker 3: So anyway, statutes are getting tripped up by hopium or nationalism,
Speaker 3: nationalism or patriotism. These are aspects of progressivism that they invented.
Speaker 3: You know, Theodore Roosevelt. There's not a more nationalistic president,
Speaker 3: I don't think, or patriotic image of false president than
Speaker 3: Theodore Roosevelt. And this is the first progressive presidential platform
Speaker 3: nineteen twelve, the Bull Moose Party.
Speaker 1: So right, that was kind of like an inverted way
Speaker 1: of looking at nationalism though. I mean, when you have
Speaker 1: there's a certain guy from Germany who was a nationalist too,
Speaker 1: and he had a whole much better success rate when
Speaker 1: it came to making his country strong again. So, I
Speaker 1: mean nationalism is a good thing if you're trying to
Speaker 1: preserve who you are and maintain your species before it's
Speaker 1: wiped out.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yep, And I would say, like anything, those two
Speaker 3: words nationalism and patriotism are you know.
Speaker 1: They're considered a mental disorders according to the big huge
Speaker 1: book that they come out with every year or every
Speaker 1: so many years.
Speaker 3: Well, nationalism would be directly opposed to internationalism, right, This
Speaker 3: was the whole idea to make subservient our national states
Speaker 3: and to create a for a national, overarching international body
Speaker 3: that controls all of them. You have to think you
Speaker 3: can see where they would have looked at it as
Speaker 3: an enemy. I look at it. You know, we look
Speaker 3: at things like the beginnings of NFL football games and
Speaker 3: sporting events, and now they've got giant American flags that
Speaker 3: are rolled out and you know, oftentimes a military, yes,
Speaker 3: the military is singing the national anthem. These are the
Speaker 3: things that are the problem. Right is it the idea
Speaker 3: of preparedness and efficiency, the idea of collective security, or
Speaker 3: the idea that we need to be prepared against a
Speaker 3: foreign entity they that might want to take over the world.
Speaker 3: As far as we can see there's only been one.
Speaker 1: Well that's the problem in the twentieth century, and that's America, Right.
Speaker 1: It's the vagueness of flag means something implies this. So
Speaker 1: I just assume that that's who those people stand for.
Speaker 1: That's the problem they're waiving. It's just like waving something
Speaker 1: behind them. There's a completely different plan. I mean, what
Speaker 1: does a flat that. I understand what you're saying. They're
Speaker 1: using the props, they're using the plot devices to and
Speaker 1: then people don't think is this sincere Are they deleting
Speaker 1: us down a path? Are they just trying to get
Speaker 1: us to the Hurah? So that we associate this guy
Speaker 1: means constitution because flag was used. I totally understand what
Speaker 1: you're saying there. That is absolutely one hundred percent correct.
Speaker 1: But if we understood that patriotism means we have a
Speaker 1: responsibility and of duty to uphold and hold them to
Speaker 1: accountable personally us to the Constitution and those then that's
Speaker 1: a whole different mindset. Then you're actually preserving that which
Speaker 1: it's supposed to stand for, not what it's become. Right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you want to talk about four and entanglements versus
Speaker 3: you know, interventionalism, right. That's that's the different definitions of
Speaker 3: nationalism or patriotism that we're that are conflicting. That we're
Speaker 3: talking about, is that nationalism and patriotism. Really it's a
Speaker 3: US foreign policy. Once it goes there, it goes wrong.
Speaker 3: But to to emphasize American built automobiles and to you know,
Speaker 3: maximize tariffs against incoming exports or imports that may affect
Speaker 3: American life, that is sort of the positive aspect of
Speaker 3: nationalism and patriotism. Right, That we weren't supposed to be
Speaker 3: involved in foreign entanglements. This is you know, World War
Speaker 3: One's the first time that America steps off its soil
Speaker 3: to go and fight wars. Right, So this is the
Speaker 3: problem the US foreign policy created by Lewis D. Brandeis right,
Speaker 3: in the same months he's create Israel and US foreign
Speaker 3: policy and the exact same time, late late summer, early
Speaker 3: fall of nineteen seventeen, right, And I.
Speaker 1: Mean, look, and that what paved the way, what changed
Speaker 1: to make us start viewing the you know, the world stage.
Speaker 1: And I think we can look at a lot of
Speaker 1: things building up to it, a lot of like key
Speaker 1: bullet points. But obviously the Federal Reserve Act and that
Speaker 1: stranglehold of foreign investors in our world, in our you know, backyard.
Speaker 1: That's when things started to change, when they got a
Speaker 1: hold of our finances.
Speaker 3: Yeah, when you trace it right down, and it's the
Speaker 3: progressive movement. The introduction of the progressive movement starts to
Speaker 3: imply all of these institutional changes in social radical social reform.
Speaker 3: So you're looking at the Spanish American War two, and
Speaker 3: then you know, in eighteen fifties you got the First
Speaker 3: International and Second International. That's what that all is about.
Speaker 3: Marx is involved in all of this, and he's directly
Speaker 3: associated with the First International. But that's the idea a movement,
Speaker 3: an international movement, you know, to instead of a material
Speaker 3: force of arms and all of this war. So then, yes,
Speaker 3: the nineteen thirteen the Federal Reserve, and that's what we're
Speaker 3: going to get into. Here is a little more talk
Speaker 3: of Brandie. You know, Glenn Beck confirms again this is
Speaker 3: probably the tenth or twelve time that we've been able
Speaker 3: to confirm that, let me Debrandized is the architect of
Speaker 3: the Federal Reserve. This idea of the creature from Jackyl Island.
Speaker 3: It's plausible, and it probably happened and this is the
Speaker 3: story that we're told. But there's a deeper context to understand,
Speaker 3: and that is is that, you know, a US Supreme
Speaker 3: Court justice is really steering. He's not quite a US
Speaker 3: Supreme Court justice at this time, but he's the sage
Speaker 3: advisor to all. He's the people's attorney, very influential.
Speaker 1: That that's the mystery there. But it's not because we
Speaker 1: understand that he's a Rothschild agent planted right or some
Speaker 1: old family right. But it's pretty interesting that guy was
Speaker 1: so influential to recreating our government, you know, in our
Speaker 1: justice system.
Speaker 3: It's now this is yeah. And this is one of
Speaker 3: the aspects that we're getting into with Nicodemus is that
Speaker 3: the death of a month ago is that there's more
Speaker 3: than just Louis Brandeis's faction of Brandises and they're coming
Speaker 3: from the same place. So there's they go to Omahon
Speaker 3: department stores and shopping centers and so you can see
Speaker 3: that there's a coordinated effort with the Flexner's brand eye
Speaker 3: all of these men and they're all non practicing Jews,
Speaker 3: but they fall into underneath the label of reform Judaism,
Speaker 3: and another name for that again is progressive Judaism.
Speaker 1: Right, and you don't and you don't come out of
Speaker 1: that uh a zioniness unless you, in fact, were actually
Speaker 1: a Francis the whole time, you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: Because that those things are internect because the goals are
Speaker 1: almost exactly the same.
Speaker 3: Right, Okay, So I'm going to go to what he
Speaker 3: called control freaks in history and this is and we
Speaker 3: did cover some of this in your previous show.
Speaker 1: Right, Uh yeah, we were, yep.
Speaker 3: And he talks about the introduction of principles of scientific
Speaker 3: management into society. I think we only got a few,
Speaker 3: uh maybe ten minutes in, and so I want to
Speaker 3: keep going with this as a theme because this principles
Speaker 3: of scientific management is so key to understanding It's a
Speaker 3: it's really you know, law is important, but the principles
Speaker 3: of scientific management gets I just I just dropped down
Speaker 3: the society just as much as law does.
Speaker 1: I wasn't saying it just it just dubbed me this computer. Man,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, this computer's got some serious issues. A
Speaker 1: good thing it didn't cut off the stream. But I
Speaker 1: just got kicked out. Oh wow, yeah, okay.
Speaker 3: Well I didn't I didn't get kicked out of there,
Speaker 3: and I know you're everybody about to hear my explanation
Speaker 3: and my lead up to this clip here should.
Speaker 1: Do a full skrein on this thing. And it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: It's audio, right, Uh.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it is just audio, okay. And so he talks
Speaker 3: about Taylorism progressivism and how it's installed into every aspect
Speaker 3: of our life.
Speaker 2: Them do what we say and do it quick.
Speaker 4: Perhaps nothing made Taylor more progressive than the fact he
Speaker 4: was so in love with his own ideas. In his book,
Speaker 4: he said scientific management should be applied across all of society.
Speaker 2: Quote, the same principles can be applied with equal force
Speaker 2: to all social activities, to the management of our homes,
Speaker 2: the management of our farms, the management of the business
Speaker 2: of our tradesmen large and small, of our churches, our
Speaker 2: philanthropic institutions, our universities, and our governmental departments.
Speaker 4: This would become music to progressive ears tailors.
Speaker 1: Right, yeah, yeah, the tailorism he's actually addressing that that's
Speaker 1: that alone is an eyebrow raiser, because why are they
Speaker 1: getting into this when they you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: they're exposed. They're going to be exposing themselves a little bit.
Speaker 1: And the system that is controlled up. But yet they're
Speaker 1: doing it because they want to control and steer it.
Speaker 1: And once they start talking about it, because they have
Speaker 1: bigger platforms, they pull the details that matter, they omit them,
Speaker 1: and then we are no longer even a significant because
Speaker 1: nobody knows about us, but they know about these guys.
Speaker 1: So they'll be the arbiters of all this information.
Speaker 3: Yes, and so then we're going to show some of
Speaker 3: the information that they're missing here, that they're not actually
Speaker 3: telling you. Okay, just in a minute here, And so
Speaker 3: seventeen fifty three is the mark that he actually starts
Speaker 3: talking about Louis Brandeis in his involvement with the principles
Speaker 3: of scientific management.
Speaker 1: Just before that, when he brought up universities. Real quick,
Speaker 1: I have a whole new view on why those were
Speaker 1: established so early. I think it has more to do
Speaker 1: with the fact that they were like satellites disguise, you
Speaker 1: could call it for a religious movement, like we're talking
Speaker 1: about the Roman Catholic influence on our country, Jesuit. But
Speaker 1: also this other element that is tied end with it,
Speaker 1: which is this Zionist move maybe not so far back then,
Speaker 1: but pretty down closed. That's when that started pushing itself
Speaker 1: over here, but it established itself as these universities because
Speaker 1: education is the first place you want to go in
Speaker 1: order to start changing people's views of things.
Speaker 3: Yep, And we show the say, the Association of American
Speaker 3: Universities is created through the Morrill Act, and it's really
Speaker 3: brought over the whole university idea here in the West
Speaker 3: has brought over again from the German historical school, and everything.
Speaker 1: Comes from the same place Russia.
Speaker 3: It's all meant to do the same thing, control society
Speaker 3: through the opinion of the scientific expert. So when you
Speaker 3: think about it, that's a that's a psyop too, but
Speaker 3: it's see.
Speaker 1: I science scientific opinion.
Speaker 3: Right, This is the syop. This is the biggest syop.
Speaker 3: Is psyop is that we are so behooveing to the
Speaker 3: the opinion of the scientific.
Speaker 1: Expert because they went to a school and they're smarter
Speaker 1: than us and they have a piece of paper, and.
Speaker 3: This is the plan. From the beginning. They knew that
Speaker 3: it was fail safe, fool proof, because they could, they could,
Speaker 3: and they'd already done this road history, applied the appeal
Speaker 3: to authority, and as long as you delivered it with confidence,
Speaker 3: nobody questions you and so this has really been the
Speaker 3: confidence game that's been played for the last three hundred years,
Speaker 3: and we're actually exposing it now more better and more
Speaker 3: in depth than anybody else, showing exactly how this happened,
Speaker 3: and that of our matrix.
Speaker 1: Matt right, and that assertion that they are you know,
Speaker 1: like you said, they're they're delivering with confidence. It's it's
Speaker 1: directed at the people with the lowest level of comprehension
Speaker 1: because there's more of them, and as long as they're convinced,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. If there's people that get that this
Speaker 1: would be a you know.
Speaker 3: That's why you Tartary just totally frustrates you and I right.
Speaker 3: You know, times of people listen to it and follow
Speaker 3: it and they're like, did you hear this? And did
Speaker 3: you hear that? And so what are they operating on
Speaker 3: but the lowest frequency of communication, gossip, hearsay, happenstance.
Speaker 1: In riddles, give somebody something to do to try to
Speaker 1: figure out, right.
Speaker 3: Keep them distracted, keep them paying attention to other things
Speaker 3: other than podcasts like this. Okay, so here he talks
Speaker 3: about brandie'randeis.
Speaker 4: He was one of those guys you didn't want to
Speaker 4: get into a debate with you know, kind of like
Speaker 4: Elon Musk, you're certain to lose. The son of a
Speaker 4: secular Jewish immigrant from Prague, Brandeis was born in Louisville, Kentucky,
Speaker 4: and mostly grew up there. He was incredibly smart and ambitious,
Speaker 4: graduating from Harvard Law School when he was twenty years
Speaker 4: old with the highest grades in the school's history at
Speaker 4: the time. In eighteen seventy nine, Brandeis started a law
Speaker 4: firm in Boston with a friend from Harvard, and soon
Speaker 4: their practice was so profitable that Brandeis started taking on
Speaker 4: select cases for free. Cases that furthered his progressive ideals
Speaker 4: for Brandeis that included advancing the idea of rule by experts.
Speaker 4: This speaks volumes about Brandei's philosophy. Among his papers, a
Speaker 4: note was once found that he had written himself which said,
Speaker 4: quote vice.
Speaker 2: Client on what he should have, not what he wants.
Speaker 4: That could practically be the progressive motto in our history textbooks.
Speaker 4: The nineteen oh eight Supreme Court case Muller versus Oregon
Speaker 4: is often cited as an example of superhero progressivism at work.
Speaker 4: Before this case, the Supreme Court had considered it a
Speaker 4: right of employers and employees to establish a work contract
Speaker 4: without interference from the state. Brandeis would change that. This
Speaker 4: case demonstrated Brandeis's passion for rule by experts. He defended
Speaker 4: the state of Oregon in front of the Supreme Court,
Speaker 4: packing his brief with over one hundred pages of research
Speaker 4: and supposed science backing up his theory that women working
Speaker 4: long hours was quote dangerous to the public health, safety, morals,
Speaker 4: and welfare. This this progressive argued that the state was
Speaker 4: correct to restrict work hours for women, rather than allowing
Speaker 4: employers and employees to set up their own work arrangement.
Speaker 4: Brand Ice won the case, as he usually did, and
Speaker 4: he's been hailed as a hero ever since for his
Speaker 4: brand Ice briefs.
Speaker 3: Okay, so that's the introduction of the Brandeis brief. And
Speaker 3: you know that social scientific way to argue law all
Speaker 3: of a sudden set precedences. And this is what we
Speaker 3: live under today, the rule of law of sociological jurisprudence.
Speaker 3: So you know, when you start to trace back how
Speaker 3: we got here and you want to know law or
Speaker 3: how the UN was created, or US foreign policy or
Speaker 3: Israel or all of these things that are jumping out
Speaker 3: at us today as problematic, they all trace back to
Speaker 3: one guy. So the one thing that the one thing
Speaker 3: that Glenn Beck isn't telling everybody is that all of
Speaker 3: these guys are Phi beta Kappa. You know, almost all
Speaker 3: of these fathers of progressivism are all summa cum laude,
Speaker 3: magna cum laude, cum laude, top of class, with honors
Speaker 3: from the highest echelons of American academia.
Speaker 1: And the fraternity itself makes a difference too, because that
Speaker 1: data that shows you the secret society aspects of what's
Speaker 1: going on here too, just under a different name.
Speaker 3: Yes, and this is really you know what we want
Speaker 3: to show. This is what's hiding under the rock, is
Speaker 3: that you know, they're all creating our future, not through
Speaker 3: our voting in you know, in in government buildings, but
Speaker 3: actually in gentlemen's clubs in New York and Washington over
Speaker 3: cigars and Kangnac like the Century Club, which is where
Speaker 3: the Bohemian Club comes from.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and uh, you know further, Hamamoto brings up another
Speaker 1: aspect when he does his his shows about the land
Speaker 1: grants that all these universities rest on, Like that's a
Speaker 1: whole strange thing too, and it ties into how they
Speaker 1: were set up, and it kind of it kind of
Speaker 1: sheds more light onto the fact that this was an invasion.
Speaker 1: These these universities were more like an invasion.
Speaker 3: Yes, that's what we that's the conclusion we came to too,
Speaker 3: with the express purpose of, you know, inculcating an entire
Speaker 3: massive people, you know, under the control of just a few,
Speaker 3: you know, that conspiracy theory that we all talk about. Well,
Speaker 3: we're showing the actual creation of it, all right. So
Speaker 3: at thirty twenty eight he talks about principal scientific management
Speaker 3: being applied to government.
Speaker 1: And then since when was the federal governments opposed to
Speaker 1: over rule states? And when it comes to you know, workouts,
Speaker 1: it's so crazy.
Speaker 3: And since when, It's a great way to ask how
Speaker 3: did we get here? Since when well, brand Eyes right,
Speaker 3: once again, brand Eye is there to create the administrative
Speaker 3: state which we call the welfare state, which everybody thinks
Speaker 3: was started under FDR note was started for presidents before
Speaker 3: that with Woodrow Wilson. This is the key aspect of
Speaker 3: history that nobody's talking about that breaks wide open everything
Speaker 3: and explains everything and completes the puzzle in a lot
Speaker 3: of ways.
Speaker 1: You know, I saw Glenn Beck question, looks like a
Speaker 1: kind of like a and you know flip. If the
Speaker 1: B was just curled, it'd be like like an ass
Speaker 1: above silver low type of thing going on right there.
Speaker 1: Just that little square, which is the square itself is
Speaker 1: interesting if you look at the Saturn cult just saying,
Speaker 1: but that could be wrong. Maybe if you're talking about the.
Speaker 3: Glenn Beck logo.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it looks.
Speaker 3: With a little lightning bolt between it.
Speaker 1: Oh there's a lightning bolt, is there? Look at that? Yeah?
Speaker 3: Ah, grateful dad to you know, splitting the two aspects
Speaker 3: of our brain, two sides of our brain. Yeah. Interesting.
Speaker 4: Armed with his magic new rhetorical device, it was time
Speaker 4: for progressive operatives to do what Taylor's book dictated, apply
Speaker 4: scientific management to basically everything, but especially government. A little
Speaker 4: over a year after Taylor's book came out, Louis Brandeis
Speaker 4: met his ideological twin, Woodrow Wilson. They met just after
Speaker 4: the Democratic Party nominated Wilson for president. Wilson, the former
Speaker 4: president of Princeton and Governor of New Jersey at the
Speaker 4: time of his nomination, was instantly captivated by Brandeis's intellect
Speaker 4: Wilson biographer A. Scott Berg wrote that brandeis quote as
Speaker 4: much as anyone would shape the future of Woodrow Wilson's
Speaker 4: campaign and career. Brande Ie and Wilson a perfect match,
Speaker 4: two self styled experts, a Harvard man and a Princeton man,
Speaker 4: like minded about the problem facing America. They both thought
Speaker 4: America had outgrown the Constitution.
Speaker 1: Can you pause there for a second. I don't think
Speaker 1: Woodrow Wilson had any of his own ideas. I think
Speaker 1: they're given him. I think they're putting that onus on him,
Speaker 1: because then you don't have to talk about the people
Speaker 1: who basically made him and used him as a puppet
Speaker 1: to be just standing out in front. I think it
Speaker 1: permuted you muted?
Speaker 3: Yeah, sorry. So he's bringing likenesses between Woodrow Wilson and
Speaker 3: brandeis there, right, But he doesn't mention that they're both
Speaker 3: Phi beta kappa. So Woodrow Wilson, he's the first and
Speaker 3: maybe the only president in history to have a PhD,
Speaker 3: and he got his dissertation by writing about the advantages
Speaker 3: of the British parliamentary system. He's also while he was
Speaker 3: the President of Princeton, he was the guy that gave
Speaker 3: out the Rhodes scholarships. So you can see a direct
Speaker 3: connection between Woodrow Wilson and American establishment Cecil Roads. And
Speaker 3: then it makes a lot of sense when you see
Speaker 3: that Woodrow Wilson's in Paris with the Anglo American establishment,
Speaker 3: you know, Lord Milner and Robert Cecil and these key
Speaker 3: lieutenants of Cecil Roads creating Cecil Rhodes's dream. The one
Speaker 3: thing that he wanted before he died was to have
Speaker 3: British and the United States come together and have one
Speaker 3: center of control in London and another in New York.
Speaker 3: And what were they but the Council on Foreign Relations
Speaker 3: in the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Speaker 1: This is of England and the and the city of
Speaker 1: London too, which puts some right back in the Rothschild's control.
Speaker 3: Right yeah. And and that's and you know Cecil Rhodes
Speaker 3: is a Rothschild agent too. He's down taking uh, diamonds
Speaker 3: and natural resources from Africa and the scramble for Africa.
Speaker 3: And this is where they create the whole myth that
Speaker 3: diamonds are worth something mm hm. So when you want
Speaker 3: to talk about the multiple veils that are over our heads,
Speaker 3: if we're just you know, still normy television watchers. It's
Speaker 3: it's actually quite incredible. So yeah, you're right, I think
Speaker 3: that that's you know, that's the money center of the
Speaker 3: world really too at that point London. So it makes sense.
Speaker 1: And that that again once once again, when we talk
Speaker 1: about fraternities of this sort, if they're in government in places,
Speaker 1: they're there, by their oaths to one another, supposed to
Speaker 1: pick you know, help their brothers out throughout their entire lives.
Speaker 1: So once you get a few of these guys and
Speaker 1: keep positions, the rest of them will be coming in
Speaker 1: like the gut, the floodgates are open, and they'll take
Speaker 1: all kinds of influential positions in government. It's an infiltration
Speaker 1: yet again.
Speaker 3: And those university college fraternal connections that they make so
Speaker 3: persede everything else going direct forward for sure. So here
Speaker 3: they explain how the experts are the ones that are
Speaker 3: going to fix all of the problems that were created
Speaker 3: at the Industrial Revolution.
Speaker 4: So we see themselves, Brands and Wilson believe the situation
Speaker 4: required experts to fix it. They nominated themselves to do it.
Speaker 4: Wilson was the first president to have a PhD. And
Speaker 4: progressives were beside themselves about it. The left charge against
Speaker 4: every non progressive president since Wilson has been that they're
Speaker 4: just dumb. When Wilson was president of Princeton, he gave
Speaker 4: a speech title our Elastic Constitution that really should have
Speaker 4: been a warning sign to America.
Speaker 3: But do you want to make a comment on that one.
Speaker 1: Oh, just just blows my mind that they could have
Speaker 1: that type of attitude, especially in that time period where
Speaker 1: people weren't They were just must not have been paying attention.
Speaker 1: It wasn't TV because I would have outraged people. They
Speaker 1: would have seen that as a let's bring the pitchforks
Speaker 1: and tiki torches to the castle, yep.
Speaker 3: And I would say that it did outrage people. It
Speaker 3: was just because there's no way to really amplify. You know,
Speaker 3: they're very isolated in regional at that time. Like you say,
Speaker 3: there was no television, and newspapers by nineteen seventeen were
Speaker 3: all taken over by JP Morgan. So you know, right,
Speaker 3: they were able to do what they wanted to do,
Speaker 3: much like they do today. And actually that compartmentalization is
Speaker 3: really perfected today on social media. Right, we all live
Speaker 3: in an echo chamber or a bubble.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's pretty messed up, but yeah, it is. It
Speaker 1: is what it is. And if we think that we're
Speaker 1: speaking to anybody, half the time, we're talking to a
Speaker 1: wall because they don't let you get seen, they suppress yourself.
Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, So here's some more quotes we'll take
Speaker 3: out of here quick. Just these are real quick ones
Speaker 3: and happiness.
Speaker 4: Brandison Wilson had big plans for America, which they dubbed
Speaker 4: the New Freedom during the nineteen twelve presidential campaign, but
Speaker 4: when Wilson won the election, the reality was that he
Speaker 4: still had to work within the constitutional system for the
Speaker 4: time being, so they needed willing allies in Congress to
Speaker 4: carry out their progressive bidding. You know, the field of
Speaker 4: medicine didn't used to draw a distinction between itself and
Speaker 4: what we would now call holistic remedies. It was just
Speaker 4: the field of medicine. Something's worked better than others, and
Speaker 4: that's it. But then, of course came the ex birds.
Speaker 4: They insisted on things being done in a certain way,
Speaker 4: which meant that a lot of good treatments for things
Speaker 4: that we all had taken or our grandparents had done
Speaker 4: that really did work, went by the wayside. Relief Factor
Speaker 4: is one of our sponsors and partners on this program,
Speaker 4: Relief Factor.
Speaker 3: So you can see I think you alluded to this
Speaker 3: in our last episode last Wednesday. Yeah, you get this
Speaker 3: attack on holistic remedies in medicine and how you know,
Speaker 3: the Rockefeller Institute created our modern day medicine and it's
Speaker 3: Rockefeller's father who's actually the snake oil salesman and these
Speaker 3: holistic remedies in the ways.
Speaker 1: It was literally a snake oil and a horse thief.
Speaker 3: And more. There was more accusations than that, but the
Speaker 3: law was chasing that that man around for a long time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's actually socialdvs to for sure need all kinds
Speaker 1: of things going on that guy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they think they call them wild Bill, wild Bill Rockefeller.
Speaker 3: So elastic constitution is another. You know, this is very
Speaker 3: key to understand that they're trying to move an immovable
Speaker 3: object because the US Constitution and our right to speak
Speaker 3: and think freely isn't supposed to be negotiated. It's never
Speaker 3: supposed to be moved. These are goalposts that are never
Speaker 3: supposed to be moved. Yet this is all they do
Speaker 3: that in creating this living moving law to compensate for
Speaker 3: a ever growing more complex society that's always moving forward. Right,
Speaker 3: this idea of progress, this myth of evolution that humans
Speaker 3: always need to evolve. This is we're going back a
Speaker 3: few one hundred years now, but this is how long
Speaker 3: this long game has been played, is it? First they
Speaker 3: had to establish this idea that humans evolve, and then
Speaker 3: that humans always progress.
Speaker 1: And you have Thomas Huxley being the bulldogs for uh
Speaker 1: do do's moving forward?
Speaker 3: The idea of the theory of evolution, which is still
Speaker 3: a theory to this day.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: That pisses a lot of people off to say that,
Speaker 3: but that is true.
Speaker 1: What's interesting is that there is a club called the
Speaker 1: X Club that was also in support of that. And
Speaker 1: then you have everything that Elon Musk does has has
Speaker 1: the mark of the X on it. Pretty fun, right,
Speaker 1: at least that's a lot of people say in pretty
Speaker 1: als Crowley that the circle with the like the thing
Speaker 1: that looks like the the X men logo, a circle
Speaker 1: with an X in it is allegedly the true mark
Speaker 1: of the beast symbol. Interesting, right, yep?
Speaker 3: So four forty five we just want to continue to
Speaker 3: substantiate that. You know, Louis Brandeis is the chief economic
Speaker 3: advisor to Wilson, he's the most the closest, most trusted
Speaker 3: advisor to Wilson. He's the creator of the new freedom.
Speaker 3: So he's telling people, here's what your new freedom is
Speaker 3: going to look like. At the beginning of the twentieth century.
Speaker 1: New the news is always thrown under when they're about
Speaker 1: to vert something.
Speaker 3: Well, one of the great ways you can tell a
Speaker 3: progressive is the inclusion of the word new is often there, right.
Speaker 3: So up in Canada we have the New Democratic Party,
Speaker 3: the NDP, that's progressive, right, and so all you're going
Speaker 3: to identify there is that there is a third unspoken
Speaker 3: party that is influencing both. So this, like we say,
Speaker 3: this starts to make a lot of sense to people
Speaker 3: that wonder why, no matter which party's in control, does
Speaker 3: US foreign policy continue unabated, right, doing the same thing,
Speaker 3: killing people from a good, safe distance. Why for the
Speaker 3: laste hundred years they still call it Wilsonianism. That's why,
Speaker 3: because these guys are the ones that created it in
Speaker 3: the same months of nineteen seventeen that they created it Israel.
Speaker 3: And we can't say that enough and loud enough, because
Speaker 3: just look around today and you tell me, any energy
Speaker 3: that's out there more harmful than US foreign policy and Israel.
Speaker 1: You can't. You couldn't have had revolution if you didn't
Speaker 1: first have the Federal Reserve. You couldn't have had the
Speaker 1: Balfour and everything that happened there to bring about Israel
Speaker 1: if he didn't first conquer us financially here and then
Speaker 1: you funnel and siphon the wealth of our nation into
Speaker 1: these programs.
Speaker 3: And perfectly, said Daniel, at a perfect time.
Speaker 4: Louis Brandeis became Wilson's chief economic advisor. Wilson wanted to
Speaker 4: give Brandeis a cabinet position, but there was strong public
Speaker 4: pushback because of Brandeis's radicalism, so he remained just an advisor.
Speaker 4: In that role, Brandeis was one of the chief architects
Speaker 4: of both the Federal Reserve Act and the new Federal
Speaker 4: Trade Commission. The Federal Reserve was absolutely transformation. It created
Speaker 4: twelve regional reserve banks controlled by the Federal Reserve Board. Naturally,
Speaker 4: board members were pointed by the President, but this government
Speaker 4: monolith would have power to adjust the interest rate, regulate banks,
Speaker 4: and control the nation's money supply.
Speaker 1: Did you say there were no branches? Did he say,
Speaker 1: there was I'm sorry, twelve.
Speaker 3: Twelve federal banks dispersed around the United States.
Speaker 1: That's that alone, I think is symbolic the number, the.
Speaker 3: Number, right, Yeah, well, well I'm not sure if that
Speaker 3: includes the one in Washington, like the Federal Reserve itself,
Speaker 3: Otherwise it'd be thirteenth if it didn't.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's interesting.
Speaker 3: Woodrow Wilson lands in Paris for the nineteen nineteen Paris
Speaker 3: Peace Conference on Friday the thirteenth.
Speaker 1: Oh, now that's the anniversary of state that they wanted
Speaker 1: to Yeah, that's the anniversary of the quote unquote betrayal
Speaker 1: of the Templars.
Speaker 3: So it took further your point that you made about
Speaker 3: having to establish the Federal Reserve as a foundational aspect
Speaker 3: before they could move forward. We'll let this run another
Speaker 3: forty five seconds or so.
Speaker 4: Just weeks before Wilson took office, the sixteenth Amendment was ratified,
Speaker 4: allowing federal income tax. Wilson then signed in the first
Speaker 4: peacetime federal income tax law in US history, and the
Speaker 4: only Republican Senator to vote for it was Robert la Folette.
Speaker 4: Wilson considered it his duty and right to lead Congress
Speaker 4: by the nose who accomplish his agenda. He forced himself
Speaker 4: on Congress more than any other previous president. He was
Speaker 4: the first since John Adams to give a State of
Speaker 4: the Union speech in person before Congress. Most previous presidents
Speaker 4: rarely visited the Capitol Building, but Wilson used an office
Speaker 4: in the Capitol as often as three times a week.
Speaker 4: The strong arm the legislative process. Wilson had barely been
Speaker 4: in office for a year when one journalist remarked, quote,
Speaker 4: the vital fact in any present American politics is the
Speaker 4: enormous control, if not a sendency, which President Wilson is
Speaker 4: exerting over Congress. Republican Senator Albert Cummins of Iowa told
Speaker 4: his Senate colleagues.
Speaker 2: Quote, the influence which has been exerted by the President
Speaker 2: upon members of Congress, an influence so persistent and determined
Speaker 2: that it became coercive, is known to every intelligent citizen
Speaker 2: of the United States. It ought to humiliate us all
Speaker 2: somewhat when we'd look around and find that the people
Speaker 2: generally not only understand the surrender of our rights and privileges,
Speaker 2: but observe it with a certain degree of satisfaction.
Speaker 3: Okay, Yeah, we're showing just how much influence the progressive
Speaker 3: movement has at this point. La Folette is a key guy,
Speaker 3: the guy with the huge head of hair, but it's
Speaker 3: really brandized. It's directing everything.
Speaker 1: You know. It's interesting too because, you know, showing that
Speaker 1: Wilson was, you know, expending a lot of energy to
Speaker 1: push this stuff forward. They there's quotes and books that
Speaker 1: I've read about him being the perfect scoundrel for the
Speaker 1: position because he was absent of morality and all this
Speaker 1: other stuff. I've read books that Michael S. King wrote
Speaker 1: that have you know, quotes just being transferred, so it's
Speaker 1: it's not like it's made up or his opinion, it's
Speaker 1: it's actual quotes from people who were involved in it.
Speaker 1: So for him to then write in a memoir or
Speaker 1: whatever the hell was, you know, warning about the very
Speaker 1: thing that he created, is just they do this, they
Speaker 1: do that, and then then historians will be like, look,
Speaker 1: he didn't understand what was going on, or he was
Speaker 1: trying to warn us. And then Eisenhower, who murders like
Speaker 1: the tons of Germans, who you know, flips the Geneva
Speaker 1: convention upside down. So these people who he's got control
Speaker 1: over have no rights, and what he's generalized on are
Speaker 1: murders them all by starvation and other means, and then
Speaker 1: goes on ahead to be basically a communist president in
Speaker 1: our government. He says in his farewell address something about
Speaker 1: the military industrial complex, as if that wasn't something he
Speaker 1: worked for hand in hand, And a lot of people
Speaker 1: will dissect that and say he was warning the the
Speaker 1: what you're seeing there is he's warning of a threat
Speaker 1: to their power by the people if it's not squashed,
Speaker 1: not the other way around.
Speaker 5: That.
Speaker 1: People interpret it as like he's telling his other people
Speaker 1: be careful because they could always do this and that.
Speaker 3: Well, regardless of its his intent or purpose. The military
Speaker 3: Industrial complex was created in nineteen seventeen too, Right, This
Speaker 3: is board and the executive orders that Wilson makes, and
Speaker 3: who do they put at the head of it the
Speaker 3: chairman but Bernard Baruk and who is he but the
Speaker 3: lone wolf of Wall Street? Also Phi Beta Kap. Yeah,
Speaker 3: so Sita also sort of underline what you just said
Speaker 3: about Wilson and keeps in mind that Louis Brandeyes is
Speaker 3: a key speech writer for Wilson too. Okay, so I'm
Speaker 3: just going to play a clip from our The History
Speaker 3: of Propaganda channel on YouTube where we go into sort
Speaker 3: of the documentary style of content.
Speaker 1: Just one quick, real thing I would want to read
Speaker 1: it so that you know, to talk about, uh, make
Speaker 1: about the same period of the United States. A Jew,
Speaker 1: Bernard M. Beruch, advisor to Presidents Wilson and FDR, said
Speaker 1: to a Committee of Inquiry of the American Congress, I
Speaker 1: probably have had more power than any other man has
Speaker 1: had during the war. And some added he might have said,
Speaker 1: we Jews had more power than any of you Americans
Speaker 1: had during the war, and it would have been true. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And I mean if when you look at what was
Speaker 1: going on there, it would make sense that all their
Speaker 1: wishes were being fulfilled.
Speaker 3: Yes. And we'll see if I can get to another
Speaker 3: quote here in a sec that's actually very famous in
Speaker 3: the alternative media world, conspiratorial world. It's a great admission
Speaker 3: and it comes directly from Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom, the
Speaker 3: first sentence of which is written by Woodrow Wilson, and
Speaker 3: he says, I did not write this book. That's the
Speaker 3: first thing that's written in there. And so who who
Speaker 3: wrote it? But this guy named Hale and probably brandied
Speaker 3: those are the two key speech writers for Wilson at
Speaker 3: that point. So you wanted to talk about Wilson and
Speaker 3: just his intent, and.
Speaker 1: There's him wash his hands of it. Was that him
Speaker 1: doing this with the you know, I didn't write this.
Speaker 1: Is that him washing his hands?
Speaker 3: Quite possibly? Quite possibly because in the before he dies
Speaker 3: he also has some other quotes in which he he
Speaker 3: admits that he may have been the worst president in history, right,
Speaker 3: and let energies, he didn't understand.
Speaker 1: That's what I was. That's what I was saying, like,
Speaker 1: you can't do you can't you know, actively and with
Speaker 1: such high energy, be forcing me and pushing this stuff
Speaker 1: to turn upside down the constitution and then bells all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, Yeah I was bad. Well, no shit,
Speaker 1: you knew that the whole time.
Speaker 3: Well, and we see that pattern in a lot of people.
Speaker 3: You know, Norbert Wiener does the same thing, the inventor
Speaker 3: of cybernetics. Later on, he's like trying to distance himself
Speaker 3: from it all, and he's horrified by how they used
Speaker 3: his feedback loop to create war and kill people. And
Speaker 3: it's like long after you made your money though, in Arbert,
Speaker 3: and you're not about to get back in right, and
Speaker 3: you are a disciple of your father, just like Woodrow
Speaker 3: Wilson's a disciple of his father who actually broke the
Speaker 3: Presbyterian Church into a north and south.
Speaker 1: Oh wonderful. Hey, did you you know that there's an
Speaker 1: Edgar Casey aspect to uh to Wilson too, right, there's
Speaker 1: a what Edgar Casey uh connection?
Speaker 3: He I don't know who Edgar Casey is.
Speaker 1: Get the sleeping prophet. The guy would take a nap
Speaker 1: and you'd be able to tell you something about you know,
Speaker 1: what's gonna happen to you, what you can do.
Speaker 3: No, I've never heard of that guy.
Speaker 1: Wilson wasn't feeling well. He had he had talked to
Speaker 1: Edgar Casey and he'd asked if there was anything, you know,
Speaker 1: if he was gonna make it, and he's like no.
Speaker 1: And then within two weeks Wilson was dead.
Speaker 3: Oh wow, I didn't know that. Yeah. Yeah, he dies
Speaker 3: a abruptly, right. He comes down with a sickness while
Speaker 3: he's traveling around here. He has all the intent of
Speaker 3: going for a third term too. This is what they
Speaker 3: are planning to do. And then he passes away, and
Speaker 3: that's why they're you know, you don't see the progressives
Speaker 3: in until FDR, because there's three Democratic presidents or two
Speaker 3: democratic presidents in between, and they just couldn't gain their
Speaker 3: trust and influence.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so he brought down to millions of overgenerations. He
Speaker 1: very much deserves to be ashamed.
Speaker 3: Well, you know what else is interesting too, is that
Speaker 3: I see nowadays when I'm doing my research, they'll they'll
Speaker 3: say that FDR was a Republican. FDR is he's a
Speaker 3: creator of the welfare state, and he did some damage,
Speaker 3: and he's the first socialist president, but he was a
Speaker 3: republicization You go, look, he ran on a Democratic ticket.
Speaker 1: So of course he was out of freaking York going
Speaker 1: around New York.
Speaker 3: I mean, he's part of the progressive movement as a
Speaker 3: young man. He's here in World War One in the navy. Right.
Speaker 3: So just quickly that here's something that we put together
Speaker 3: on Wilson with his quotes, just to underline what you'd
Speaker 3: said earlier. Along with Wilson came great expectations presented by
Speaker 3: newsprint and radio. Is the only man in the world
Speaker 3: able to settle traditional European frustrations. Frank pok Lippmann, Frankfurter
Speaker 3: and Cournel House had all been in Paris since October,
Speaker 3: and the US propaganda operation had had some time to
Speaker 3: prepare for the president's arrival. He was cheered in the
Speaker 3: US when he left, and welcomed in Europe with open
Speaker 3: arms when he arrived, almost as if the general public
Speaker 3: had forgotten his previous twenty four months in Paul Science
Speaker 3: Wilson being involved in a war to quote make the
Speaker 3: world safe for democracy end quote, a striking volte fass
Speaker 3: after being reelected in late nineteen sixteen largely on his
Speaker 3: staunch anti war viewpoints.
Speaker 1: I was just writing that down pacifist.
Speaker 3: To interventional warmonger and the international leader of a moral
Speaker 3: crusade in less than one hundred days. Historians cite several
Speaker 3: reasons for Wilson's astonishing turnabout, but seldom do they seriously
Speaker 3: consider those around him, those with influence, those able to
Speaker 3: persuade the president of the Orwellian belief that war was
Speaker 3: the only way to peace. Brandeyes, Frankfurter, and Littmann were
Speaker 3: all near the center of Wilson's inner circle. Each had
Speaker 3: his ear, and each had profound influence on Wilson's thinking,
Speaker 3: beyond that of even his own administration. So here's the
Speaker 3: quote I want to On December tenth, six days after
Speaker 3: departure from Hoboken, the President summoned members of the Inquiry
Speaker 3: to his quarters. There. If we are to believe the
Speaker 3: accounts we see revealed the idealist in Wilson, the President
Speaker 3: demanding a new order of things. That quote, if it
Speaker 3: won't work, it must be made to work agreeably. If
Speaker 3: we can disagreeably if necessary, tell me what's right and
Speaker 3: I'll fight for it. Give me a guaranteed position end quote. Okay.
Speaker 3: So that's a famous meeting. And this is why we
Speaker 3: created the Embers of War part to the Inquiry on
Speaker 3: the Atlantic, because this is where the Deep State actually
Speaker 3: infiltrates America, and it's on the boat that they make
Speaker 3: these plans. They pull in this Inquiry group, the founders
Speaker 3: of the CFR, and this is where they tell them that, Okay,
Speaker 3: once we arrive in Paris, you guys are going to
Speaker 3: be the scientific experts of everything. We're going to rely
Speaker 3: on you. You give me a winning argument and we're going
Speaker 3: to go with that. And you know, even my own
Speaker 3: Secretary of State, Robert Lansing, we're not going to listen
Speaker 3: see him and you can see it in the body language.
Speaker 3: Even in the official pictures of Paris Peace Conference. You
Speaker 3: can tell that there's a battle going on for control
Speaker 3: and it's the progressives. This deep state. You know, we
Speaker 3: q Tartari often talks about deep state takeovers. Well, this
Speaker 3: is when it happened. You took the scientific expert these
Speaker 3: professors of history and economics, these social science professors at
Speaker 3: Harvard and Columbia, and infiltrated American government that superseded it's
Speaker 3: its own departments of influence. So and you see there
Speaker 3: Wilson's forcing these things through, like you said, right, agreeably
Speaker 3: if we can, disagreeably if necessary. This is the same
Speaker 3: things that one of the Werburg said about a one
Speaker 3: world government, that it's going to happen whether I like
Speaker 3: it or not. These are all on congressional record. I've
Speaker 3: got the actual receipts for all of these.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, also, let's look at this real quick,
Speaker 1: since you brought that up, because this is another statement
Speaker 1: and I've used this before, but this fits right in
Speaker 1: here because this is the same type of sentiment. During
Speaker 1: a visit to Jerusalem, Chime Wiseman had said, speaking to
Speaker 1: the British authorities. We shall have Palestine, whether you wish
Speaker 1: it or not. You can hasten our arrival or retard it,
Speaker 1: but it would be better for you to help us,
Speaker 1: for unless you do so, our constructive power will be
Speaker 1: transformed into a destructive power which will overturn the world.
Speaker 1: That's the same type of sentiment.
Speaker 3: Yes, for sure. So it's the same group of people.
Speaker 3: It infiltrates America. This is a new world order, right,
Speaker 3: the illuminati all of these words that we use, but
Speaker 3: this is how they decided to infiltrate America was through
Speaker 3: our liberal sentimentalities.
Speaker 1: It crawled right in. They didn't have to. There was
Speaker 1: no war, there were no shots fires called.
Speaker 3: A vampire needs to be invited in the same things
Speaker 3: happen here. Is that we invite these policies because they
Speaker 3: sound good. And today largely when you talk to a
Speaker 3: liberal and you ask them what that means, and you
Speaker 3: ask them to define liberalism, they will often say open mindedness,
Speaker 3: and so then yes, that's fine, but where does where's
Speaker 3: the limit to this open minded because if you're open
Speaker 3: to everything, well, we're going to quickly see the world
Speaker 3: that we have today. Right with horror films and playing
Speaker 3: such a prominent role and being available to kids of
Speaker 3: all ages, regardless of what security measures you want to
Speaker 3: say are there, and parental locks are on the televisions,
Speaker 3: these children still find these images because they permeate our
Speaker 3: culture so.
Speaker 1: Deeply self traumatizing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, this is where it all comes from. You want
Speaker 3: to talk Frankism, right, this is Luciferianism today, Satanism, all
Speaker 3: of these things that the q tards are all saying, well,
Speaker 3: this is the original literal creation of it and the
Speaker 3: infusion into America of these antinomial uh ideas of degeneracy.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, the world, the world liberal has been injured
Speaker 1: it as well as everything else. But yeah, but it does.
Speaker 1: It is like a signature. It's like a like that
Speaker 1: like liberty, fraternity equality. That's the that's the Masonic lie
Speaker 1: that they tell other people to get the mob in
Speaker 1: a in formation, and it's liberty, fraternity quality, impossible equality.
Speaker 1: That's what's another thing that they call it impossible quality.
Speaker 1: This is all in the protocols too, Yes, because who
Speaker 1: was at the and the and the and the Jesuits
Speaker 1: having a conversation.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's noble lives.
Speaker 1: A lodge and yeah, and then and then bringing up
Speaker 1: that part about sorry, I say again.
Speaker 3: Well, it's unattainable ideals right through noble lives. This is
Speaker 3: how they've motivated all of these people through progressive mautra.
Speaker 1: They know how to play it out their sentiment and
Speaker 1: or even though they don't have any of their own,
Speaker 1: like devoid of any type of like conscience or empathy,
Speaker 1: they know they know how to operate and push our buns.
Speaker 1: But the seconds the second term of Wilson, that was
Speaker 1: a total sham Trojan Horse peace platform, right, and of
Speaker 1: course they had to have an actual you know, event
Speaker 1: to have and it and it didn't happen right after
Speaker 1: Lusitania happened some months later, like maybe eight or something
Speaker 1: like that. But they had to have their event because
Speaker 1: I mean then that of course, if your that happens
Speaker 1: and you have to go to war. But it was
Speaker 1: all set up. It was all set up at the beginning,
Speaker 1: just like the same it's happening right now too. Like, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna solve it overnight, says Trump. You know, there'll
Speaker 1: be a Ceize fire and they'll be a ran will
Speaker 1: be will be settled down, everything will be fine.
Speaker 3: And Harris is saying the same thing.
Speaker 1: And this is the same guy who said it preempt
Speaker 1: a strike. Sounds like a good idea. Yeah, it's like
Speaker 1: you're talking about sidesus all the time.
Speaker 3: And Janus, do I need to remind Trump cards of
Speaker 3: Operation warp Speed? Right?
Speaker 1: Why are we letting that guy back when we have this?
Speaker 3: You can't have intellectual honesty and be supporting either one
Speaker 3: of these candidates or supporting the two party system in general.
Speaker 3: You don't have any integrity with me if you were
Speaker 3: cheering for either or paying attention in any way to it.
Speaker 3: And then if you know it's a sham and you're
Speaker 3: just watching the document, you're still paying attention to the
Speaker 3: wrong thing.
Speaker 1: Man, right, erelating your energies and it's influencing your mind.
Speaker 1: And yeah, exactly. And that's I tried to show some
Speaker 1: video clips yesterday of the RFK junior, you know, his
Speaker 1: speech talking about him, you know, pulling out him with
Speaker 1: Trump in this ridiculous And I couldn't the low level
Speaker 1: of the comprehension that it was that it was, you know,
Speaker 1: geared toward, was so obvious to me, and it was
Speaker 1: raw rah rah hoorah moments. Everybody cheers, everybody chanced the
Speaker 1: same freaking words. It was so freaking cultish and stupid
Speaker 1: and so low level comprehension that I just like, I
Speaker 1: can't get through this, and that Tolsi one. All of it.
Speaker 3: Support. It's low level, just like propaganda posters of nineteen
Speaker 3: seventeen were, and the sinking a little Lusitania and all
Speaker 3: of these things that happened back then, the bayonating babies
Speaker 3: that apparently the beasts of Berlin, all of these this rhetoric,
Speaker 3: it's all directed at the lowest common voter or lowest
Speaker 3: common denominator.
Speaker 1: You know, it's an educated voter the most you're doing
Speaker 1: that stuff. So it was a projection. They're projecting their
Speaker 1: own sins on other people and calling them the ones.
Speaker 1: They're doing it right. As long as they get ahead
Speaker 1: and say it first, then they're the ones. Same thing
Speaker 1: with law right first one in is the one with
Speaker 1: the claim exactly exactly.
Speaker 3: That's a great point. So can you see a page there.
Speaker 1: Yes, I mean I can make it bigger so I
Speaker 1: can read it too, Yeah, And I.
Speaker 3: Can bring it in here because this is directly out
Speaker 3: of the New Freedom. So this is the Woodrow Wilson's
Speaker 3: nineteen twelve presidential campaign, and in it it says, since
Speaker 3: I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided
Speaker 3: to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the
Speaker 3: United States in the field of commerce and manufacturer are
Speaker 3: afraid of somebody. They are afraid of something. They know
Speaker 3: that there is a power somewhere, so organized, so subtle,
Speaker 3: so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they
Speaker 3: had better not speak above their breath when they speak
Speaker 3: in condemnation.
Speaker 1: Of it, right as if he's not part of it is.
Speaker 3: You know, this is where the kids figure out that
Speaker 3: something's up, so so the mask gets revealed.
Speaker 1: And that's what's happening right now. And what we're seeing,
Speaker 1: we're seeing like a completely over control being slowly shown
Speaker 1: to us to where they're not even trying to hide
Speaker 1: it anymore, which is still not working to wake people up.
Speaker 1: But again people will say so if not him, then Harris,
Speaker 1: it's like, no, we need to stop all of that.
Speaker 1: I don't know how without you know, standing up in
Speaker 1: solidarity that would happen. But it's something that needs to
Speaker 1: be thought about because October September, I mean they're all
Speaker 1: September is right around the corner. It's two months before
Speaker 1: the the big show. And if we're not in some
Speaker 1: sort of you know, World health organization inspired hell by
Speaker 1: then I don't I would be surprised personally.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, they're gonna have to up the fear for sure.
Speaker 1: And we're fucking shooting at people last year or last time, right,
Speaker 1: get in the house.
Speaker 3: Right. So, just to further substantiate everything that we've been saying,
Speaker 3: here's another article, scientific management and Stackhnavism. It's going to
Speaker 3: be some Soviets last name. A historical perspective of how
Speaker 3: Taylorism the principles of scientific management goes to the Soviet Union.
Speaker 3: It's translated in nineteen thirteen or nineteen fifteen, the same
Speaker 3: year that Frederick Winslow Taylor dies, by the way, and
Speaker 3: you see that Stalin Lenin Trotsky. It doesn't take much research,
Speaker 3: it's not very deep, right, you can easily find this
Speaker 3: information where they all publicly admire the tailor system.
Speaker 1: And is that kind of arming? The same thing that's
Speaker 1: being adopted and integrated into our country is something that
Speaker 1: is been heralded by the Bolsheviks, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: we created and funded and made into a thing and
Speaker 1: who did that.
Speaker 3: But Jacob Schiff, Warburg's and Brandeis is directing these two
Speaker 3: men specifically through the Joint Distribution Committee. They're funneling money
Speaker 3: into the creation of Palestine in the early nineteen twenties
Speaker 3: with the Palestine Economic Corporation. Jacob Shiff is there. I've
Speaker 3: shown this picture right. So when you talk about the
Speaker 3: flipping of the definition of liberalism, also, we've gone over
Speaker 3: that with one of our last episodes in which we
Speaker 3: went into the House of Truth, this political salon in Washington,
Speaker 3: in which they deliberately, implicitly by design, wanted to flip
Speaker 3: the definition of liberalism. And these same people in nineteen
Speaker 3: thirty eight coined the term neoliberalism. And so now you're
Speaker 3: here one hundred years later, and you can see sort
Speaker 3: of with that much hindsight very clearly, so the conclusions
Speaker 3: and sort of the long game of these ideas that
Speaker 3: happened so long ago. So we should be able to,
Speaker 3: like I say in one of our videos, be able
Speaker 3: to both bear witness to everything that's been happening and
Speaker 3: then make the final conclusions. And this is really what
Speaker 3: we want this great Awakening to come to, is a
Speaker 3: conclusion that progressivism and this need to always be moving
Speaker 3: forward at the cost of human health and safety is
Speaker 3: a bad idea from the beginning, and it should be
Speaker 3: pretty much entirely thrown out along with this opinion of
Speaker 3: the expert unless you can argue me something in which
Speaker 3: I can consider, you know, where it's beneficial, because I
Speaker 3: think a lot of these ideas that they come up
Speaker 3: with in progressivism can be good except they're used for bad.
Speaker 1: What does the constitution say when it comes to law itself?
Speaker 1: What does this say? Just follow that? Because why did
Speaker 1: we walk away from that in the first place? That
Speaker 1: would solve the whole expert shit, because why does that
Speaker 1: supersede what? What the what the written word is they
Speaker 1: actually pay attention to, you know, that would be that one.
Speaker 3: So the well developed individual is the perfect antidote to
Speaker 3: a tyrannical government. That's a great quote comes from Jordan Peterson.
Speaker 3: And I don't like this guy at all anymore. I
Speaker 3: don't know. He's a controlled opposition, he's a syop, he's
Speaker 3: a walking siop. We all know that. But he actually
Speaker 3: helped me learn how to write and through their future
Speaker 3: Authoring program, And so some of those quotes still resonate
Speaker 3: with me very very clearly, because they're true that a
Speaker 3: well developed individual is a perfect antidote to a tyrannical
Speaker 3: government or a tyranny of any type. A well developed
Speaker 3: individual will be able to overcome it because they'll be
Speaker 3: sustainable in their own being. They will be sovereign.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: Progress, progressing to exactly well. The Great Society, industrial democracy,
Speaker 3: which is what we live in today. This is what
Speaker 3: brand Is imposed onto us. The Great Society written by
Speaker 3: Graham Wallace, Fabian founder and Industrial Democracy written by Sydney Webb,
Speaker 3: another founding Fabian, and they used this. If you go
Speaker 3: into part seven, eight, nine, and ten, you see how
Speaker 3: they use this idea of industrial democracy, the great society,
Speaker 3: a society governed by the pinion of a scientific expert,
Speaker 3: and how they use those and how Brandeis uses those
Speaker 3: and is inspired by the Fabians Walter Littman. You know,
Speaker 3: The Great Society is dedicated to Walter Littman. So you
Speaker 3: can see the total joining of the American Progressives and
Speaker 3: the British Fabians, aggressive movement sweeping across the Atlantic, and
Speaker 3: you know it's all part of the manifest destiny. And
Speaker 3: you want to go further deeper back. It's probably inspired
Speaker 3: by the Enlightenment, you know, it's the whole idea of
Speaker 3: scientific expert or man being greater than God.
Speaker 1: That's where the like psychiatry came out of that, the
Speaker 1: like the Parisian Renaissance and all that stuff too. It's
Speaker 1: very interesting how that then is the one of the
Speaker 1: driving forces in the Soviet Union to get rid of dissonance.
Speaker 1: Is like, you're mentally ill, Let's put him in a
Speaker 1: you know, let's make him. Let's black black bag him
Speaker 1: and pull him out of society because he's a not
Speaker 1: toning the line. Okay, now I got a question for
Speaker 1: you and archangel good question. They're you know, good, good
Speaker 1: statement that you made.
Speaker 3: That's a great question that everybody should be asking exactly
Speaker 3: progressing to where because you're not going to like the answer.
Speaker 3: So then my question to you, Daniel is this. We
Speaker 3: know that they've been using like French expressionist art to
Speaker 3: demoralize America. We see in my article in nineteen thirteen
Speaker 3: that they bring over the the Armory shows and this
Speaker 3: really sends Fishers through America. It's radical introduction of taboo subjects.
Speaker 3: At the same time that Edward Brenees is doing this
Speaker 3: by the way on Broadway. But do you think that
Speaker 3: the whole movement of French expressionist art was inspired by
Speaker 3: Frankism and this degenerate movement social movement.
Speaker 1: If so, you'd have to look at the quality. Is
Speaker 1: it uninspired? Is it like corporate art? Is it meaningless?
Speaker 1: Is it cubism? Is it that's kind of crap that
Speaker 1: if it, if it pulls away from the creative mind,
Speaker 1: it makes everything gray and bland and uninspired, then yes,
Speaker 1: and it's done on it's done deliberately. Make the arts
Speaker 1: ugly as one of their one of their main objectives.
Speaker 1: Make the arts ugly, make it meaningless, make it chaotic,
Speaker 1: make it insane, because you're going to you're going to
Speaker 1: be developing a culture of insanity. So then the fact
Speaker 1: that influences them has to do that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that nineteen thirteen Armory show. There's three places
Speaker 3: in America, New York, Chicago, and somewhere else San Francisco maybe,
Speaker 3: and that that whole movement to bring over you know,
Speaker 3: French artists like Matisse, and you know Nudes Descending Stairs
Speaker 3: is one of the paintings, but it's abstract and cubist.
Speaker 3: So you can sort of make out a nude body.
Speaker 3: It's almost like the introduction of nudity, because you couldn't
Speaker 3: just throw a nude lady in front of culture back then.
Speaker 3: It would have shocked everybody wide away. And so there's
Speaker 3: these subtle nudges of society. And so the nude Descending
Speaker 3: Staircase is a famous painting in which, you know, traditional
Speaker 3: American sentiment uprose against they were very upset at these things.
Speaker 1: Well that's strange too, because if you go back into
Speaker 1: like Greek art and sculpture and stuff like that, nobody
Speaker 1: was wearing clothes back then. But it is how it's
Speaker 1: presented in a perverse manner, or is it like, you know,
Speaker 1: some kind of epic depiction, you know what I me,
Speaker 1: I mean with dignity.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's presented almost like fabianism. You know, it's also
Speaker 3: sitting on the grass under trees, in the shade by a.
Speaker 1: River, Sayesian in my mind, a little bit more of
Speaker 1: his little harem.
Speaker 3: Right, and I add something to that. Oh, and the
Speaker 3: creator and the organizer of these nineteen thirteen Urmory shows
Speaker 3: guts On Borglum, the sculptor for Mount Rushmore. Yeah, and
Speaker 3: House of Truth resident in which on that dining room
Speaker 3: table they made the first designs for Mount Rushmore. So
Speaker 3: he's had a high level of Freemason. He's thirty third degree.
Speaker 3: He's he's the head of the Grand Master of more
Speaker 3: than One that his life more than one Lodge, and
Speaker 3: he's very close personal friends with Theodore Roosevelt, also thirty
Speaker 3: third degree Mason. And so you know, the House of Truth,
Speaker 3: the New Republic magazine, all of these are progressive. They're
Speaker 3: all put in nineteen eleven, nineteen twelve, nineteen thirteen, nineteen
Speaker 3: fourteen to support Roosevelt. That was the initial idea, but
Speaker 3: I think Roosevelt didn't want to go as far as
Speaker 3: Woodrow Wilson was willing to go on the Constitution. This
Speaker 3: is really what we found out is that Theodore Roosevelt
Speaker 3: didn't want to touch the Constitution. So they got Oliver
Speaker 3: Wendell Holmes, who was open to experiment and an open
Speaker 3: minded liberal, and Louis brand As and Felix Frankfurter exploited him,
Speaker 3: and this is how they started experimenting on the US
Speaker 3: Constitution through Woodrow Wilson. Because Woodrow Wilson's open to parliamentary
Speaker 3: government and he's already leaning towards the British form of
Speaker 3: governing society, and he's talking about elastic constitutions, so you know,
Speaker 3: it doesn't take too much. And then something else you
Speaker 3: addressed too was, you know, Woodrow Wilson's complete turn around
Speaker 3: at his second election for a second term. So he's
Speaker 3: elected on the campaign promise that he kept us out
Speaker 3: of war, and within four months of being elected again
Speaker 3: for a second term, he's announcing war on Germany.
Speaker 1: Right right and declared war on Germany first Judaism, But
Speaker 1: in reality we're talking about the Zionists, which in relation
Speaker 1: our Francis, the Tellmudists, and the extreme to Torah followers collectively,
Speaker 1: that those three prongs of people who are you know,
Speaker 1: the non religious, you can't really tie them up in
Speaker 1: the same thing because they're not a radicals like that.
Speaker 1: So that that's a distinction to make. Even though people
Speaker 1: are being angry and like, no, it's all them, It's
Speaker 1: like it's really not, because there's real life examples that
Speaker 1: I have in my life that are not like that,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, You got to make the distinction.
Speaker 1: There's people and then there's and there's individuals, and then
Speaker 1: there's groups. But you can't categorize people for them. They
Speaker 1: they will show you if they are in a group
Speaker 1: or not by their by their actions. You can't just
Speaker 1: assume that they're all that way.
Speaker 3: Yep, yep. So maybe we direct people to further their
Speaker 3: understanding of that idea to the Future Perfect Part one
Speaker 3: and two.
Speaker 1: Now is this a video?
Speaker 3: Da? Sorry? Is this? So?
Speaker 1: Is this a video the Future Perfect?
Speaker 4: So?
Speaker 3: Is this like a or is this article? Can you
Speaker 3: see that? Or does it still stay on the landing page?
Speaker 3: It goes to Future Perfect Part one?
Speaker 1: Yep, I see, I see photograph.
Speaker 3: So it just it shows you this ominous continuity that
Speaker 3: goes on and this incredibly important era. Here's your founders
Speaker 3: of the Council on Foreign Relations, many uh lifetime members here.
Speaker 3: They're all you know, uh social science professors. These this
Speaker 3: is the real deep state takeover this group of men here,
Speaker 3: this is when it happened for them at Paris. And
Speaker 3: you can see they're all professors of economics or history
Speaker 3: specifically of Central Europe at high level American universities. And
Speaker 3: a lot of these are child proteges, like super intelligent
Speaker 3: dudes that they had identified through the K through twelve
Speaker 3: education and then fast track them to management positions.
Speaker 1: And so one would ask, how is it that there's
Speaker 1: this quality of being extremely intelligent but being devoid of conscience,
Speaker 1: and who are not or not knowing? We can't assume
Speaker 1: that they are not aware of what they're doing.
Speaker 3: They know what they're doing. But it's through the noble
Speaker 3: lie of internationalism that this this idea of internationalism now
Speaker 3: is going to supersede material force of arms and all
Speaker 3: this ugly fighting and you know, mass murder. This is
Speaker 3: what inspired these gentlemen.
Speaker 1: So, which is funny because if they knew who they
Speaker 1: were working on, behalf of the greatest mass murders ever
Speaker 1: to exist. Yes, and this is an era where that
Speaker 1: mass murder was at its height. Yeah, and they picked
Speaker 1: away for more.
Speaker 3: It's just like today, they're told that these people beyond
Speaker 3: our horizons are our enemies and they're directly wanting to
Speaker 3: destroy our freedom. So you see here it says the
Speaker 3: great society had grown furiously into colossal dimensions by the
Speaker 3: application of technical knowledge. It was made by engineers who
Speaker 3: had learned to use exact measurements and quantitative analysis. It
Speaker 3: could not be governed. Men began to discover by men
Speaker 3: who thought deductively about rights and wrongs. It could be
Speaker 3: brought under human control only by the technic which had
Speaker 3: created it. So now we say one hundred years later
Speaker 3: that it's totally out of control and the only way
Speaker 3: that we're going to actually put everything back into order
Speaker 3: is if we have a great awakening and people see
Speaker 3: a problem with progressivism.
Speaker 1: You know, how they sold international entablement is by shaming
Speaker 1: people with the with the term of being an isolationist,
Speaker 1: as if that's like as if that's you know, a
Speaker 1: way of calling somebody in the enderthal or rock or
Speaker 1: under in a cave or something, which is completely ridiculous, ridicule. Yeah, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: And that's and that's a funny thing because it was
Speaker 1: like a badge of dishonor like, hey, you're an isolationist
Speaker 1: and this idea that you're either by not addressing the
Speaker 1: world stage or somehow hiding from it or trying. But
Speaker 1: at what point would anything as far as this, uh,
Speaker 1: having to fight other people's wars and getting involved in this,
Speaker 1: Why is that beneficial? What does it serve unless you're
Speaker 1: serving somebody else's ambitions it's not yours, Because how does
Speaker 1: that affect us. It doesn't.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and who who's setting precedent on espionage on the
Speaker 3: Espionage Act and not speaking out loud about things. But
Speaker 3: brandeis do you know who?
Speaker 1: Do you know anything about the Dawes Plan that came
Speaker 1: out in nineteen twenty four. It was like a revision
Speaker 1: of the Versi tree.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's basically like re mortgaging your house. This is
Speaker 3: what they kept doing.
Speaker 1: To the results.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they just couldn't. They set standards of repayment. They
Speaker 3: were so high that everybody in the world knew that
Speaker 3: this was never going to happen. So they downgraded these
Speaker 3: over the next few years, and in nineteen twenty four
Speaker 3: through the Dows Plan that was that was probably right
Speaker 3: at the time that the French that were occupying Germany
Speaker 3: and taking all of their coal for the next fifteen
Speaker 3: years was one of the resolutions coming out of there. Right,
Speaker 3: they stand back and let the French come in there
Speaker 3: and just continue to take their natural resources, and any
Speaker 3: German that rose up against it, the police or the
Speaker 3: authorities there would put them down.
Speaker 1: And look and look what happened with Canada and China. Right,
Speaker 1: if there's a debt to pay China has resource access
Speaker 1: to everything in Canada. Why we're not allowed to create
Speaker 1: a pipeline makes me wonder if we've already sold off
Speaker 1: those rights of our own resources to someone else for
Speaker 1: our debt, and it would all get tied right back
Speaker 1: to the same international bankers at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: depending regardless of what country you want to blame for
Speaker 1: it for you know, having control over them, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: It's all part of the same system. Once you get
Speaker 1: the understanding that there's countries are words, they're not really
Speaker 1: disconnected if they have that central bank in there, and
Speaker 1: that that DAWs plan had like an eight hundred million
Speaker 1: dollar at that time, ridiculous amount of money, like a
Speaker 1: tree hundred million dollar alone, which is kind of like
Speaker 1: an imf thing for quote unquote building what they just
Speaker 1: what they destroyed in the just the first war, not
Speaker 1: the second one.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, And so they use the term entering wed
Speaker 3: when describing the expert the scientific technical experts. In chapter
Speaker 3: twenty five of Public Opinion, written by Walter Littman, who
Speaker 3: we consider the father of modern day journalism, he writes
Speaker 3: of applying the social science technical expert as the entering
Speaker 3: wedge driven deliberately between the private citizen and the vast
Speaker 3: environment in which he's entangled. Now that message still is
Speaker 3: a key aspect to our society today, that we must
Speaker 3: lean on the scientific expert because it's our environment is
Speaker 3: too vast and too complicated for us to understand. Now
Speaker 3: this is a smith too.
Speaker 1: It's overriding too. It's like we'll forget about what has
Speaker 1: been set in place by our founders. Let me explain
Speaker 1: to you, let me man explain to you what's really
Speaker 1: going to happen, how this actually wriks right.
Speaker 3: So it's actually you were You mentioned interventionalists, interventionism, and
Speaker 3: this is what inspired me to grab this future perfectness
Speaker 3: because that is who created the League of Nations, which
Speaker 3: turns into the United Nations with a bunch of pacifists.
Speaker 1: The CEFR logo right there, the freaking gay look and
Speaker 1: gay naked dude on a horse.
Speaker 3: Yes, and under here it says ubique, which means everywhere.
Speaker 3: So these are the clubs that they're all members of,
Speaker 3: and most importantly this one here Century Association, Century Club,
Speaker 3: This is the Bohemian Club. And there's also Pilgrim Society
Speaker 3: is another major one.
Speaker 1: The Loyal Leaves wrapped around something like when you see
Speaker 1: the World Health Organization, you see the United Nations, the
Speaker 1: globe is in the middle. So that's saying that they
Speaker 1: actually have right in service to Rome. They have put
Speaker 1: the crown of lorl leaves around them for their for
Speaker 1: their for their duties that they've conducted their their their
Speaker 1: deeds to Rome.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Pretty interesting, right.
Speaker 3: I agree. I agree. And so then you also mentioned
Speaker 3: who declared war to begin with in World War One, Well,
Speaker 3: it was the British that declared war on the Germans first.
Speaker 3: This is another misconception that we have in mainstream that
Speaker 3: the Germans declared war on somebody else? What was the
Speaker 3: Brits first? Through this Bryce group and you see him first,
Speaker 3: Viscount Bryce on the bottom right hand side.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, see him.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So this is you know, he writes the American Commonwealth,
Speaker 3: So there you go. Commonwealth is a British idea, right,
Speaker 3: except he's combining the idea of Americanism with the British Commonwealth.
Speaker 3: Here an Anglo American worldview. He's a key guy here
Speaker 3: because he writes a report in which he.
Speaker 1: Says President funny.
Speaker 3: He writes a report on the transgressions of the German
Speaker 3: people and they're all propaganda. It's the entire report today
Speaker 3: is considered propaganda. And that is what they point to
Speaker 3: is the origins of the First World War. And he's
Speaker 3: a pacifist. Apparently they named Bryce goes back generations.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they had an issue with the consolidation of German
Speaker 1: territories because they were fearful of the competitive nature that
Speaker 1: they would pose upon their their bottom line, so they
Speaker 1: wanted to break it up.
Speaker 3: Yeah. So the League to Enforce Peace was another one
Speaker 3: of these groups. And this is led by William Howard Taft.
Speaker 3: And here's where you find all of the Skull and
Speaker 3: Bones Phi Beta Kappus. They're all in this piece and
Speaker 3: it's led by Taft. This is all the lead up
Speaker 3: to the creation of the League of Nations and then
Speaker 3: thus the creation of the United Nations. There's a direct
Speaker 3: link between the League of Nations and the United Nations.
Speaker 3: It's admitted, documented historical fact that nobody can question. It's irrefutable. Okay,
Speaker 3: So here's the origins of the United Nations, is what
Speaker 3: you could really say. And who is it but Scull
Speaker 3: and Bones Phi Beta Kappas. So these are all organizations
Speaker 3: older than America r And here's the Pilgrim Society. What
Speaker 3: does it say there at Ubique means here and everywhere.
Speaker 1: That would come transferred into the CFR, because I believe
Speaker 1: the CFR was They credit the CFR as being what
Speaker 1: created the United Nations. If you fellow.
Speaker 3: That there's deep connections and overlap crossover between the memberships
Speaker 3: of the Pilgrim Society and the memberships of the Century Association,
Speaker 3: the memberships of the Metropolitan Club and the Cosmos Club.
Speaker 3: They are members of all of these.
Speaker 1: Look at all the symbolism they use it here. They
Speaker 1: have the lion that could that could go back as
Speaker 1: far as or it could be Yeah, I could go
Speaker 1: back as far as Greece. And you know all the
Speaker 1: tales killing lion and tearing it apart, could go to Samson,
Speaker 1: could be the actual you know they have the lion
Speaker 1: of of Israel. It's it's so many things that could be.
Speaker 1: You'd write it on a on a horse. But then
Speaker 1: you have the American Englo right there, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 3: Exactly riding on the ass. So Richard e or Eli,
Speaker 3: he's another founder of uh.
Speaker 1: The guy in the red looking he's Irish. I don't
Speaker 1: I don't think. I don't see him as speaking a pilgrim,
Speaker 1: you know, yes, the guy that the guy sitting on
Speaker 1: the horse and ready.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah. He's a very interesting dude too, isn't he.
Speaker 1: He doesn't look like he's you know, you have an
Speaker 1: irishman racing.
Speaker 3: He looks like a magi.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I interrupt you. I just thought he's.
Speaker 3: Got something up a sleeve. There's no doubt about it.
Speaker 3: He's pointing forward to which is progressive.
Speaker 1: Yeap.
Speaker 3: So Richard T. Ely taught Woodrow Wilson. He's the father
Speaker 3: of land economics. Okay, so this is he's a key
Speaker 3: advocate for preparedness. Also in part of this league to
Speaker 3: enforce peace, these non interventionalists that created the United Nations.
Speaker 3: President of Harvard Phi Beta Kappa Alexander Graham Bell, and
Speaker 3: science delegate in Paris, Rabbi Stephen Weiss, who is a
Speaker 3: key lieutenant to Louis brandeis.
Speaker 1: You know, I think this whole creating of the great
Speaker 1: people who have creative ideas and are scientists and stuff
Speaker 1: like that. Of course, they want to invent things, and
Speaker 1: you want to make true progress occur to better the
Speaker 1: lives of people. But they've weaponized everything, and having communications
Speaker 1: was a key for them to carry out their plan obviously.
Speaker 1: So it's it's funny that Alexander Graham Bell would be
Speaker 1: involved in that. I'm sure they didn't have any problem
Speaker 1: with Edison and his thievery slightly of his ideas. You know,
Speaker 1: it's it's just if you bring bring bring the tech,
Speaker 1: bring the tech, bring the tech.
Speaker 3: You know, that's exactly it. What you know, technology is
Speaker 3: also intellectual property, right if you think of something that's
Speaker 3: also technology. So that's what they're doing. They're they're gathering
Speaker 3: and corraling all of the intellectual property the smartest people
Speaker 3: and the most controlling technology. That's what we see here.
Speaker 1: Hey, Archangel, can you can you please elaborate because I'm
Speaker 1: not sure what you're discussing right here? He says, through Yeah,
Speaker 1: the Jews actually through Boycott. Yeah, that's that's the second war,
Speaker 1: right he was talking about the first When you're talking
Speaker 1: about the Brice, Is that what you're talking about with
Speaker 1: the Bryce? I think you unless I'm missing what you're
Speaker 1: talking about. Uh, he says, dude his way off in
Speaker 1: this one, deflecting much. No, I don't think that's the case.
Speaker 1: But I could be. I mean, maybe I just don't
Speaker 1: understand what the question is. What do we mean, Well,
Speaker 1: there's a archangel's demand, so I don't think he's trying
Speaker 1: to be He says, philosophers need to be taught once
Speaker 1: more to the Greek rolling over in their graves. He
Speaker 1: says the Jews. Actually, but I'm not sure what he's
Speaker 1: talking about there. It could have been from uh, the
Speaker 1: idea of we're talking about the First World War and
Speaker 1: how that started with the British. I think think, I
Speaker 1: think the idea of the Jews or Judaism declares war
Speaker 1: on Germany was what he's saying is like the thing
Speaker 1: that happened before Germany, long before Journey went into the
Speaker 1: boycotts and stuff like that. But I think, and he
Speaker 1: says through boycotts, so we're talking you're talking about the
Speaker 1: second run, not the first.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and you're talking Kaufman and Germany must perish and
Speaker 3: all of that stuff. Same things going on in the
Speaker 3: First World War.
Speaker 1: This is that only came out involved in.
Speaker 3: The First World War two. I mean, this is the
Speaker 3: creation of Israel. This is the whole reason for the war.
Speaker 3: I mean, you could probably go back to a long
Speaker 3: view and understand that these world wars were planned from
Speaker 3: long before, and so you can start to see that
Speaker 3: all of this is leading up to wars that they
Speaker 3: created on purpose, that had been in design for a
Speaker 3: long time, probably since you got to shake up society
Speaker 3: to change it. And so you know, the Great War
Speaker 3: was was a key catalyst to the creation of internationalism
Speaker 3: because they showed just how ugly war can be. Did
Speaker 3: you I don't know if you got We're not Hey,
Speaker 3: we're not hiding anything. There's the Jewish involvement here. That's
Speaker 3: exactly what we're showing. The Zionist organizations in Paris in
Speaker 3: nineteen nineteen and they right everybody of the Bellpour Declaration
Speaker 3: of the creation of Israel.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're getting very specific with the fact that you know,
Speaker 1: the frankest specifically, we're keep opponents or proponents there. So
Speaker 1: this right here, I'm not sure if how many people
Speaker 1: have actually gotten this, but in here I also show
Speaker 1: the connection between the Rothschilds and their allegiance or their
Speaker 1: servitude to the Roman Catholic Empire.
Speaker 3: I e.
Speaker 1: There, you know, you can say the Maltese Cross, you
Speaker 1: can say it's the star of Saint Sylvester. It's hard
Speaker 1: to tell by the paintings, but they that's an award
Speaker 1: for service. And they did bail and I show him
Speaker 1: this that they bailed out the Roman Catholic Church with
Speaker 1: ridiculous low ins by today's money in the eighteen fifties,
Speaker 1: I believe it was, and maybe once before that. But
Speaker 1: there is this misconception that it's just I see them
Speaker 1: as the property managers for the world of state of Rome.
Speaker 1: So they are an integral part. They are the dark Priest,
Speaker 1: they are everything that we say that they are. But
Speaker 1: that's not completely absent of Rome's involvement on the world
Speaker 1: stage as the ones who have already claimed all the
Speaker 1: land that people and their souls by people bulls. And
Speaker 1: what you have to then say is who's really running Rome?
Speaker 1: Is it more of the chosen people? Have they moved
Speaker 1: into That was that they're construct in the first place
Speaker 1: because of the Old Testament? You know what I mean
Speaker 1: is that the kinship there that so there's a lot
Speaker 1: of stuff that can be talked about there. But it's
Speaker 1: like they're like this, they're intertwined.
Speaker 3: So two really interesting things about what you just said
Speaker 3: there is that you know, one of the first ever
Speaker 3: International Congress on management. So this international push to make
Speaker 3: the principles of scientific management around the world took place
Speaker 3: in Rome with Mussolini as the keynote speaker. I think
Speaker 3: we covered this last week and they exchanged pictures because
Speaker 3: oh yeah head by then, and so the wife in
Speaker 3: Mussolini exchanged. This story is actually told by Glenn Beck.
Speaker 3: Yeah you know, I don't do it, and yeah, this
Speaker 3: actually happened. This is where my research is right now.
Speaker 3: I want to know more about that first ever international
Speaker 3: meeting on.
Speaker 1: Mussolini might have been like obnoxiously arrogant, but I don't
Speaker 1: think he's nearly the asshole that people, uh paint him
Speaker 1: ount to be. Obviously, I have a completely different view
Speaker 1: of Hitler than most people do, too because of you know,
Speaker 1: digging deep into the topic and finding out that it's
Speaker 1: pretty You can you can show the aggression or Germany.
Speaker 1: You can see it was a reflexive response and know
Speaker 1: they were they were all starving. So yes, people starved,
Speaker 1: and you can call that the whole burning thing, the
Speaker 1: whole barbecue, the great Barbecue conspiracies all bullshit, you know,
Speaker 1: and so all the things that they were doing to Russians.
Speaker 1: They were basically projecting on Germany for having done that.
Speaker 1: They were terror bombing the shit out of that place.
Speaker 1: They didn't have trade routes anymore for food to get
Speaker 1: to anywhere. Everybody in freaking Germany was in a bad spot.
Speaker 1: And the whole transfer agreement thing is never addressed. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of things. Yes, he did say words, but
Speaker 1: as far as any extermination plan, there was none ever written,
Speaker 1: ever spoken about. That's all added later.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I agree with that. Mostly's influence in America is
Speaker 3: very hidden and pretty substantial actually too, because you know,
Speaker 3: you look under the arms of Lincoln at his memorial,
Speaker 3: there are two fascies under his arms, and there's fascies
Speaker 3: above the entrance way into the Oval Office. There's fascies
Speaker 3: at the Unknown Soldier Memorial. And I see that as
Speaker 3: the underneath the George Washington statue somewhere else in Washington, DC.
Speaker 1: It's like, I understand, it's Roman thing, but it's also
Speaker 1: the idea of it's hard. You know, it's very most
Speaker 1: you know, remedial way of looking at it, because I
Speaker 1: know it has deeper implications, but it's a lot harder
Speaker 1: to break a bunch of sticks than it is just
Speaker 1: one idea. It's a solidarity thing. I mean, it makes
Speaker 1: sense in that sense, and they could be used for
Speaker 1: good or bad. But when everything is inverted upside down,
Speaker 1: then it starts becoming a symbol of a group, and
Speaker 1: the group is the freaking bad guy. Right, So then
Speaker 1: you understand it.
Speaker 3: Sorry, well, when you think of cult of personalities, they're
Speaker 3: not going to get people to follow along things that
Speaker 3: aren't attractive, So they're going to speak to you in
Speaker 3: ways and promise you things that bring you their way, right.
Speaker 3: And so we know in political discourse every word has
Speaker 3: two meanings, and this is one of the key aspects
Speaker 3: to our grand awakening is to understand that we must
Speaker 3: hold people accountable to terms.
Speaker 1: And they're going to show you recognize, right, It's all
Speaker 1: about the simplicity of the message. They're going to show
Speaker 1: you things that you recognize so that you jump out
Speaker 1: of it, like waving American flags behind somebody when they're
Speaker 1: speaking that type of thing.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Oh, so then your brain is associating, you know, all
Speaker 1: the things that you believe vaguely about what you're supposed
Speaker 1: supposed to be, you know, about for your own self preservation.
Speaker 1: This guy is representing it because the flags behind him.
Speaker 1: And what's weird is that these days you have just
Speaker 1: as many uh flags of visual as you do the
Speaker 1: you know US flags behind certain would be presidents half
Speaker 1: and half divide a repeto in the center. Yeah yeah,
Speaker 1: and that ship and it represented in flag form and
Speaker 1: dual loyalty.
Speaker 3: I think they called it multiple citizenships, a term like
Speaker 3: that back in the day. But that's all popularized by
Speaker 3: Brandeyes in his control of international Zionism. Starting in nineteen fourteen.
Speaker 3: He's the head of Theodore Hertzel's headquarters when they move
Speaker 3: it from Berlin to New York.
Speaker 1: So here insane. This guy, one guy is like the
Speaker 1: lynchpin from last right.
Speaker 3: This is an incredible story. And this is really what
Speaker 3: is being gate kept since So the League of Nations
Speaker 3: Union was another one. This is the merger between the
Speaker 3: League of Free Nations Association and the League of Nations Society.
Speaker 3: So here's really the Anglo American connection. We start to
Speaker 3: see JP Morgan representatives, we see British Foreign Office Secretary
Speaker 3: Sir Edward Gray, So we're seeing Anglo American establishment.
Speaker 1: Phil Strakeford, Yeah.
Speaker 3: Felix Frankfurter, Thomas lamont Is, JP Morgan, Council, Edwin gay
Speaker 3: Slow and Johnson Hunter. These are all Inquiry members. So
Speaker 3: this is the predecessor to the Council on Foreign Relations.
Speaker 3: We see Lord Milner. Lionel Curtis is the guy that
Speaker 3: brings them both together. Philip Kerr is a key member
Speaker 3: there with the Anglo American established in the British War Department.
Speaker 3: He's also a resident at the House of Truth Bazaarly
Speaker 3: at nineteen seventeen club. There's another one of these groups
Speaker 3: that helped found the un Walter Ross.
Speaker 1: That's where the belfour Declaration is written to, wasn't it Walter?
Speaker 3: Yeah, And so this is Virginia Wolfe's father, Leonard and
Speaker 3: Oliver Strakey. Okay. Other notables of this nineteen seventeen club
Speaker 3: oh Aldous Huxley, H. G. Wells, Ramsay McDonald, which is
Speaker 3: a Fabian right, he's the first Fabian Prime Minister. And
Speaker 3: Lord Walter Rothschild who the Balfour Declaration is addressed to.
Speaker 3: Here's British economist John Maynard, Keynes, bertrand Russell also part
Speaker 3: of Some of these guys were actually Huxley, Keynes and
Speaker 3: Russell are all members of the Cambridge Apostles, and that
Speaker 3: is a highly bisexual little group of intellectuals.
Speaker 1: Wasn't he a playwright? Which one was a playwright? Was
Speaker 1: it Bertrand Russell? Somebody was a.
Speaker 3: Shaw, George Bernard Shaw. They call him George Shaw in mainstream.
Speaker 3: If you were to talk to somebody that was up
Speaker 3: on who he is, they wouldn't use his middle name.
Speaker 3: That's a dead giveaway. But George Bernard Shaw is at
Speaker 3: the Inner Allied Labor Conferences, which were accidentally called the
Speaker 3: inter Allied Socialist in Labor Conferences. It was on the
Speaker 3: credentials you can see here that people were actually raising
Speaker 3: a ruckus about it, like why I'm not going to
Speaker 3: wear this if it says Inner Allied Socialist conference And
Speaker 3: this is who's chairing this meeting in the creation of
Speaker 3: the League of Nations prior to the Paris Peace Conference. Okay,
Speaker 3: this is all the work, although the legwork done so
Speaker 3: that they could just sign the papers at Parispiece Conference
Speaker 3: or at least formally make it public. But all of
Speaker 3: these the creation of the League was really done in
Speaker 3: private at these Inner Allied Labor conferences. There was four
Speaker 3: or five of them during the war and guess who
Speaker 3: shared them, Sydney Webb.
Speaker 1: Interesting, we got so we should, I think at some
Speaker 1: point if we could in a future show. There's some
Speaker 1: very psychopathic speeches statements by Bertrand Russell. They at least
Speaker 1: deserve a couple of minutes of our time to like
Speaker 1: listen to and or read because he his his psychopathy
Speaker 1: towards they absolutely just what do you call it? Lack
Speaker 1: of empathy for human life when he's making his You know,
Speaker 1: it's hard, it's hard to put it that in words,
Speaker 1: but it's just a matter of fact, and it's presumptuous
Speaker 1: in the set and in every sense, but also it's
Speaker 1: it's it carries some pretty deadly weight when you're when
Speaker 1: you're of a power of influence like that. It's and
Speaker 1: it happened. It's like not like they didn't carry it out.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And if we have time here at the end,
Speaker 3: I can play in one of them.
Speaker 1: Sorry, it's kind of like eugenics had a eugenics tune
Speaker 1: to it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Well they're all they're all cohabitating, they're all hanging
Speaker 3: out together. This is the you know, the beginnings of
Speaker 3: the cybernetic revolution. It's all connected back to the Paris
Speaker 3: Peace Conference. You can see them all getting together in
Speaker 3: interdisciplinary meetings and you know, figuring out how they can
Speaker 3: all fit together through thirties, forties, and fifties, and that
Speaker 3: leads to what the mk Ultra program. So here's a
Speaker 3: Century Club. One key aspect to remember in nineteen twelve,
Speaker 3: that election, one of the most famous elections in American history.
Speaker 3: All three members were Century Association members. Okay, they're all
Speaker 3: hanging out at this private gentlemen's club, smoking cigars and
Speaker 3: sharing Kanyak or scotch. This is really where US foreign
Speaker 3: policy in the future is determined. Okay, they're all centurions.
Speaker 3: That's also you know, shows that this goes further back
Speaker 3: than just America when you're starting to use terms like centurions, right,
Speaker 3: and more involvement with brandeis Frankfurter and just showing what
Speaker 3: we've shown in the House of Truth article and steering
Speaker 3: everybody back to this incredible place seventeen twenty seven nineteen Street,
Speaker 3: Northwest Washington, The House of Truth, which you can also
Speaker 3: find on the landing page of bulletproofpub dot com. It's
Speaker 3: called the House of Truth and the Devil's Agent because
Speaker 3: they use and exploit. Oliver Wendell Holmes, a Brahman who
Speaker 3: considers himself Mephistopheles.
Speaker 1: Oh that's nice, that's his nickname.
Speaker 3: They call him Mephistopheles.
Speaker 1: Why would you what that's like calling yourself Yielzebub?
Speaker 3: Right, this is and he knows. This is why they
Speaker 3: call him it, because he knows that he's gonna burn
Speaker 3: in hell for what he's doing to the America.
Speaker 1: Jesus. That wasn't supposed to be a pun, but right,
Speaker 1: I irotic drop of the word.
Speaker 3: So we'll see if I can find this George Bernard Shaw, Yeah,
Speaker 3: excerpt in which he says, like, you say some pretty
Speaker 3: crazy things.
Speaker 1: Virtin. Russell met with Vladimir Lenin too, So I mean
Speaker 1: there's it's not like it's not right out there in
Speaker 1: your in your face, you.
Speaker 3: Know, yeah, Bertrand Russell met with who did you.
Speaker 1: Say of Vladimir Lenin in twenty Yeah.
Speaker 3: And so this is another key thing is the members
Speaker 3: of that inquiry that I showed you that we're all
Speaker 3: sitting there in that black and white photo, you know,
Speaker 3: during the Paris peace conference, they they go off to
Speaker 3: Moscow to meet with Lenin. Because this is when the
Speaker 3: Bolshevik Revolution. The Bolsheviks are taking power at the same time,
Speaker 3: and so there's multiple missions going there and meeting Lenin,
Speaker 3: and who's going but guys like Lincoln Stephens and Bullet.
Speaker 3: You know, these are Foreign Office administrative diplomats, you know,
Speaker 3: the origins of the CIA before the os S, and
Speaker 3: they're going to meet Lenin too, organize what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: During the Second War, when Germany was advancing out in Russia,
Speaker 1: apparently mister mister tough guy Stalin, who's really good at
Speaker 1: killing people from a distance and declaring everybody to be murdered,
Speaker 1: he had a bit of a nervous breakdown and Avril
Speaker 1: Herriman step stepped in and basically was Stalin for a
Speaker 1: period of time unbeknownst to anybody else, because it was
Speaker 1: the plan of the brotherhood, not just that guy. He's
Speaker 1: just the figurehead. And that's that's funny that there would
Speaker 1: be absolutely nobody to be even aware that there was
Speaker 1: a difference, because it's the same they follow. They're just puppets,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. They're just not saying that
Speaker 1: they are devoid of any any responsibility. I'm just saying
Speaker 1: that there's hive minded, so it's easy to make someone
Speaker 1: else do the same exact thing the same exact way,
Speaker 1: with potentially the same exact results or better. But everl Herrman,
Speaker 1: we know who that guy is, and we know it's
Speaker 1: pretty interesting that he's doing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's yeah right, Phi Beta Kappa, Skull and Bones.
Speaker 3: He's the son of Harriman, the rail magnet. Yeah, rail
Speaker 3: lines all the way across America and making millions and
Speaker 3: millions doing it.
Speaker 1: And that ties into the Bush family later on. It's
Speaker 1: like the Brown Brothers, Harriman and all that stuff. It's
Speaker 1: just yes, just.
Speaker 3: So, Samuel Bush precedes Press Prescott. And this is where
Speaker 3: the Bush the Bush Dynasties really created was through Samuel
Speaker 3: and the War Industry's Board of nineteen seventeen working directly
Speaker 3: with Bernard Brooke in the creation of the military Industrial
Speaker 3: complex before anybody knew.
Speaker 1: Wow, isn't that surprising?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: So, same thing they got their contracts nice, isn't that nice?
Speaker 3: Yep? So that is actually an area that we really
Speaker 3: want to get into now, is into Bernard Brooke because
Speaker 3: it's really the same thing. He's got a bunch of
Speaker 3: brothers and a father prior to them that looks like
Speaker 3: he's part of the same movement, just like Woodrow Wilson's father,
Speaker 3: just like the Warburgs and the Flexner's and you know,
Speaker 3: the Brandises. We see that it's not just them. They
Speaker 3: are just sort of cogs filling in temporarily in this
Speaker 3: long view of you know, their lifetime, and they're going
Speaker 3: to contribute to this movement. So you know, they all
Speaker 3: know what they're doing. There's no doubt about it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And then you ask yourself, where's the playbook coming from?
Speaker 1: And I would say it's if it's a you know,
Speaker 1: maybe potentially coming out of, if you want to call it,
Speaker 1: the Masonic organizations, but only after they had taken him
Speaker 1: over in the seventeen eighties nineties and infiltrated with a
Speaker 1: bunch of Jesuits and Francists.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we're showing where it comes from. Is,
Speaker 3: at least in the modern terms Illuminati, the some of
Speaker 3: these meetings I saw this morning.
Speaker 1: The Skull and Bones is enough to consolidate it, you know.
Speaker 3: Yep, because you're looking at William Howard Taft is the
Speaker 3: son of the Elfond's Taft who's the creator of Skull
Speaker 3: and Bones. So there's zero degrees of separation between this
Speaker 3: crew and the creators of Skull and Bombs.
Speaker 1: So Daniel quit Gilman, who was basically a Rothschild agent
Speaker 1: straight up to Illuminati in Yale University, yep, Capital Scoll
Speaker 1: and Bones. I believe that Russell Trust actually comes out
Speaker 1: of that. He was funded by the Russell Trust. Yeah, yeh,
Speaker 1: organizations founded John Hopkins University, which I should tell you
Speaker 1: a lot right there when all this stuff that's going
Speaker 1: down with these pandemics and Russell Trust Association.
Speaker 3: Yes, and that's the executive arm of Skull and Bones.
Speaker 3: And that's who we see funding all of these books
Speaker 3: that brandizes creating with the National Consumers League. Over in
Speaker 3: sociology and establishment of sociological jurisprudence, we see a lot
Speaker 3: of the literature that's you know, nudging society again financed
Speaker 3: by the Fabian Society and Skull and Bones. So we
Speaker 3: got about seven minutes before the end of the hour here,
Speaker 3: and I should probably get going, and I would like
Speaker 3: to leave everybody with this quote from George Bernard Shaw.
Speaker 3: We've just shared it on Facebook and it reveals the
Speaker 3: whole story. So this guy, while you're listening to this.
Speaker 3: Remember he's the creator of the United Nations and Fabian
Speaker 3: Society today is the British Labor Party, a deeply influential
Speaker 3: political movement in Britain.
Speaker 2: M M.
Speaker 5: I never know exactly how to make my opinion here
Speaker 5: because I object to all punishment. I don't have to
Speaker 5: punish anybody. But there are an extraordinary number of people
Speaker 5: whom I want to kill, not in any unkind our
Speaker 5: personal physics.
Speaker 3: Okay, did you catch that?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't want to punish him, I just want
Speaker 1: to kill him.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he said there's an extraordinary number of people of
Speaker 3: whom I would like to kill. Yep.
Speaker 5: But it must be evident to all of you half
Speaker 5: a dozen people at least.
Speaker 3: We all know at least a half a half a
Speaker 3: dozen people at least that we want to kill.
Speaker 5: The more that, I think it would be a good
Speaker 5: state to make everybody come before a properly appointed board,
Speaker 5: just as he might come before the income tax commissioners,
Speaker 5: and say every five years or every seven years. Just
Speaker 5: put him there and say, sir or Meadow, now will
Speaker 5: be kind enough to justify your existence If you can't
Speaker 5: justify your existence, if you're not pulling your weight into
Speaker 5: social books. If you're not producing as much as you
Speaker 5: consume or a little more, then clearly we cannot use
Speaker 5: the big organization of our society a further purpose of
Speaker 5: keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us,
Speaker 5: and it can't be very much use.
Speaker 1: Tea right, a family member or a father, and that
Speaker 1: value that you have, it's gotta be about what you
Speaker 1: contribute to a bunch of people who have absolutely no
Speaker 1: claim on your or time, or your efforts or your money.
Speaker 3: And that is a Marxist idea, too right to be
Speaker 3: able to provide as much as you take, and it's
Speaker 3: a it's a it's a decent enough idea.
Speaker 1: You know that particular clip. There's a there's an old
Speaker 1: Twilight's o An episode called the Obsolete Man, and occasionally
Speaker 1: I put that on as my loop video before I
Speaker 1: put on a rumblet, so it plays it, but it's
Speaker 1: he's a he's a librarian, and it's it's a burgess Meredith,
Speaker 1: and he's before a board and they're saying he's obsolete
Speaker 1: because there are no more books, there is no need
Speaker 1: for a librarian. So you're going to be liquidated in
Speaker 1: twenty four hours. And that basically they're going to kill
Speaker 1: him because he's he's no longer of any value or
Speaker 1: used to their society. But he was a librarian, right.
Speaker 3: So you know, when you look at the Great Purge
Speaker 3: in the Soviet Union, this is what was going on.
Speaker 3: They had tribunals and it was you know, there was
Speaker 3: no real method to it. They were just eliminating, you know,
Speaker 3: non compliers. Anybody that wasn't going in the same direction
Speaker 3: as the newly imposed government were eliminated. And that label,
Speaker 3: you know, was comprehensive. It included everybody. And so what
Speaker 3: is what is Shaw proposing here? But the same kind
Speaker 3: of thing is tribunals in which people have to be
Speaker 3: put in front of every five to seven years to
Speaker 3: justify their existence. Yeah, that's a great eye opener. Right.
Speaker 3: This is the movement that is controlling our modern day society.
Speaker 3: This is why our society is slowly being nudged and
Speaker 3: moved because it's based on Flavius. You know, the Fabian
Speaker 3: society wants to move slow like a turtle, but when
Speaker 3: they strike, they want to strike.
Speaker 1: Hard, right, And you know it's this motto.
Speaker 3: And their logo is a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Speaker 1: And this is. This is where it's interesting because you
Speaker 1: have have to if anybody listening to that who has
Speaker 1: any like reason or or you know, sensitivity would think
Speaker 1: that this is just an insane individual who's very calm
Speaker 1: with his psychopathy and sociopathic tendencies. But it's because they
Speaker 1: reinforce the idea among their members. So it's not just
Speaker 1: that person saying it, it's someone else corroborating that idea
Speaker 1: or saying in a different way. That's more you know,
Speaker 1: malleable to the publics. But it's this artificial agreement among academics,
Speaker 1: among you know, the the experts, that they all resonate
Speaker 1: the same idea on purpose, so that it seems like
Speaker 1: it's a natural, organic conversation and not just coming from
Speaker 1: one source, which is whatever their objective is. So they're
Speaker 1: presenting it like that and they want to see the blowback,
Speaker 1: They want to see that, and then they want to
Speaker 1: also then roberate one another. So then it's becomes like
Speaker 1: this mass psychosis where people are just like, you know,
Speaker 1: it's like paralysis by analysis, like how do you what
Speaker 1: do you do with that? And then it just pushes
Speaker 1: forward because it's not about your say in it anyway,
Speaker 1: you're not going to have say in it. They've already decided.
Speaker 1: They're just letting you know that this is what's going
Speaker 1: to happen.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So one more thing, one more thing before I go,
Speaker 3: I just want to introduce everybody to this guy. I'm
Speaker 3: pretty sure most of your viewers are gonna be familiar
Speaker 3: with Edward Brene's. He's the father of propaganda. Nah, he's
Speaker 3: the double nephew of Freud, who were double nephew.
Speaker 1: Funny double, It's just a funny the double nephew because
Speaker 1: of the imprint.
Speaker 3: Yes, And this is why I want to say it
Speaker 3: is because these people aren't living normal lives, and so
Speaker 3: he wrote propaganda. He literally wrote the book on it.
Speaker 3: And this is who the Nazis actually followed his books
Speaker 3: because he writes propaganda, as you can see there in
Speaker 3: nineteen twenty eight and Crystalizing public opinion in nineteen twenty.
Speaker 1: Three, Crystallizing public opinion, manipulating people to think the way
Speaker 1: you want them to think.
Speaker 3: Isn't that exactly what you just said You're talking about
Speaker 3: how they create this consensus among themselves. Yes, this is
Speaker 3: what peer review helps establish. And isn't that what they're
Speaker 3: doing is crystallizing public opinion. Right, and so when you
Speaker 3: look into.
Speaker 1: No one else is having except for them, but they're
Speaker 1: making it out to be like this, this is the
Speaker 1: general belief of everybody, right.
Speaker 3: Right, And it's even more impressive and influential when it
Speaker 3: comes from seemingly desparate aspects of society. When you can't
Speaker 3: make a link between two different people, you start to think, oh,
Speaker 3: well everybody must think this then, right, right, And that's
Speaker 3: the trick.
Speaker 1: And that's why people on a different political platform will
Speaker 1: express ideas that come from a different political platform and wow, oh,
Speaker 1: I guess that just must be the way that they
Speaker 1: must know. This must be the way we have to
Speaker 1: do things. This must be the one that makes sense
Speaker 1: because both of them agree on it. You know, it's
Speaker 1: not to think that maybe they're all playing a game
Speaker 1: on you.
Speaker 3: Right, So look at who the father of Well they
Speaker 3: say public relations here, but he's the father of propaganda.
Speaker 3: They've they changed it. Actually, he's the one that changed
Speaker 3: it to public relations because propaganda had a bad label
Speaker 3: to it. So you can see that torches of freedom.
Speaker 3: He got everybody, He got women to start smoking. He's
Speaker 3: working with the US government in the fifties and the
Speaker 3: overthrow of Guatemala in the United Fruit Company CIA operation
Speaker 3: with the Dulles brothers Jesus. So he's working with corporation,
Speaker 3: giant corporations like ge.
Speaker 1: Yeah, John there goes. They're bringing Edison back into the
Speaker 1: into the fold there.
Speaker 3: Right, And so you know, I'm pretty sure we look
Speaker 3: at this guy because of some of the stuff that
Speaker 3: he was doing, especially early on in his career on Broadway,
Speaker 3: like movies like or Broadway musicals like Daddy Long Legs
Speaker 3: or I think that might be Annie, the original name
Speaker 3: to Annie. I'm not sure, but you know, they're they're
Speaker 3: introducing these taboo.
Speaker 1: Yes, by trying to cause yeah, yeah.
Speaker 3: Right, So it's really and it's nineteen ten, it's early on,
Speaker 3: so you're seeing subtle differences that today we would go, oh,
Speaker 3: that's not too bad of a thing. But you can
Speaker 3: see he introduces venereal disease into the public lexicon by
Speaker 3: these stories.
Speaker 1: And that's a that's a way too, that the cautionary
Speaker 1: tale so that you don't overpopulate, right, yeah.
Speaker 3: And the idea of orphans through them through.
Speaker 1: Annie the organ that might have been something that was
Speaker 1: also a thing because of a potential depopulation event that
Speaker 1: we were just kind of getting over the top of,
Speaker 1: if we if we want to go that far as
Speaker 1: to say, like the cat kids from like the eighteen
Speaker 1: eighties or whatever were a thing, and what exactly happened
Speaker 1: that they had to repopulate with all these other babies.
Speaker 1: That goes into a little bit more of the fringe
Speaker 1: woop stuff. But there's a pestibility out there that there's
Speaker 1: some validity to that.
Speaker 3: Okay, So let me end with the first paragraph of Propaganda,
Speaker 3: written in nineteen twenty eight by the father of propaganda,
Speaker 3: Edward Burnees, the double nephew of Sigmund Freud. Can you
Speaker 3: see that chapter one, organizing Chaos. So this goes right
Speaker 3: in line with what you're saying, Daniel. The conscious and
Speaker 3: intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the
Speaker 3: masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who
Speaker 3: manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government,
Speaker 3: which is the true ruling power of our country. We
Speaker 3: are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our
Speaker 3: ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of.
Speaker 1: Let me Uh, let me see if I can throw
Speaker 1: a quote in there too. If it's the right in
Speaker 1: the front, I think it's right in the front.
Speaker 3: Just incredible, right, like it's insane. Yeah, in that book.
Speaker 3: I remember reading that at the beach in the summer
Speaker 3: about eight years ago and just basically throwing that book
Speaker 3: into the lake every five minutes because it was like, Wow,
Speaker 3: it's just so packed full of you know, admissions, it's incredible,
Speaker 3: starting with the first ever paragraph written in there.
Speaker 1: Right, So, okay, so here's a here's a Charles hooyfour commentary. Right,
Speaker 1: almost all people of all eras are hypnotics. Their beliefs
Speaker 1: are induced beliefs. The proper authorities saw to it that
Speaker 1: the proper beliefs should be induced and the people believed properly.
Speaker 1: And that was Charles hoay four, eighteen seventy four to
Speaker 1: nineteen thirty two. Wow, that's how I that's the first
Speaker 1: thing that I wrote in the introduction of the book.
Speaker 3: Right, So there you go. This is the idea to
Speaker 3: control society is an age old concept. Now, population control
Speaker 3: and all of those other ways that they're controlling us
Speaker 3: are sort of subsidiary subtitles of all of that so
Speaker 3: it's it is a mass movement to control the globe
Speaker 3: or the world, the earth, whatever this is that we're in,
Speaker 3: and they're using all of these different aspects that Daniel
Speaker 3: and I are pointing out here on our Wednesday conversations
Speaker 3: to subjugate all of us into a world of wage
Speaker 3: slavery about as plain as I can say it through
Speaker 3: you know, the principles of scientific management, sociological jurisprudence, The
Speaker 3: brandeis brief, and it all comes back to a US
Speaker 3: Supreme Court justice. So I invite you to come back
Speaker 3: next Wednesday. We'll just continue this conversation and get deeper
Speaker 3: into all of these will continue to contribute more quotes
Speaker 3: and more these primary source material because really I got
Speaker 3: endless amounts of these admissions that they're making, and these
Speaker 3: are verifiable persuade sources that we're using primary source material
Speaker 3: whenever we can.
Speaker 1: Now, you did put up a pretty highvy challenge there
Speaker 1: with the Shaw clip that you played, But I'm going
Speaker 1: to see if I can find the Bertrand Russell one
Speaker 1: that's just equally as crazy, and I'll see if I
Speaker 1: can share that tomorrow.
Speaker 3: Excell Day, because I've never seen him. I mean, I've
Speaker 3: seen him say some things, but I'm looking forward to
Speaker 3: this because you know, he's a member of the Cambridge
Speaker 3: Apostles and Club nineteen seventeen, all of these non interventionalists
Speaker 3: that created our world today of perpetual war.
Speaker 1: Well, is there anything besides I mean you bulletproofpub dot com.
Speaker 1: You want to just pull that up real quick and
Speaker 1: show where people can where they can click to support
Speaker 1: the effort and things like that, and if there's anything
Speaker 1: else that's involved that you can use to get to
Speaker 1: somehow supporting what you do. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: have additional funds or anything that's going on, or fundraisers
Speaker 1: and whatnot.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, we generally are making our way through you know,
Speaker 3: our farm work. We're market gardeners, so we've been we've
Speaker 3: been pretty lucky to make you know, enough money to
Speaker 3: get us through the year. We've been able to get
Speaker 3: us this far on very little funding.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's good that you can get that, you know,
Speaker 1: within the I don't know how long is your driving season,
Speaker 1: like how many months?
Speaker 3: We're about seven months we go, you know, our food
Speaker 3: box is twenty weeks, but that's it starts about halfway
Speaker 3: through our season. So we're almost six months one way
Speaker 3: and six months the other, but it's generally more farming
Speaker 3: just because you know, it takes a little bit more effort.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the budget thing when it comes to you get
Speaker 1: everything that you're going to have for the year in
Speaker 1: that six month time. It's good that it lasted a
Speaker 1: whole year, but I'm sure there's some paperwork that's involved
Speaker 1: and making sure that that stretches right.
Speaker 3: Yes, And I would say that a lot of that,
Speaker 3: I mean it goes directly back into the farm. So
Speaker 3: we're trying to create something with BP in which we
Speaker 3: can it can become a perpetual funding machine itself so
Speaker 3: that we can hire more people. I mean, that would
Speaker 3: be incredible to start hiring people to work for us
Speaker 3: so that they can go down some of these avenues
Speaker 3: or research that we need to actually uncover to sort
Speaker 3: of complete this puzzle picture. Right, So this is where
Speaker 3: you go be Bulletproof Publishers. Can you see that? Yes, yep,
Speaker 3: So that's where you're gonna land when you put in
Speaker 3: Bulletproof pub dot com. And then if you want to
Speaker 3: support us the way down here at the bottom, we've
Speaker 3: got a scan code or you can support us. I
Speaker 3: thought there used to be a button you could push.
Speaker 1: You might want to throw it out.
Speaker 3: We'll follow the white rabbit at the very bottom and
Speaker 3: it should take.
Speaker 1: Us to yeah, okay, okay, then it didn't move up.
Speaker 3: That's my partner.
Speaker 1: It didn't move off the scare partner at this point,
Speaker 1: it didn't move off that screen. I think you're in
Speaker 1: a different uh screen.
Speaker 3: Okay, so i'd have to share that other screen. Okay,
Speaker 3: so believe me. You can go there and you can
Speaker 3: donate it says the Yon Solay Living Trust. So I'm
Speaker 3: just trusting that you know, funds are being diverted if
Speaker 3: there is any in there, sort of towards us as well.
Speaker 3: But you know, I ope Yon Solay a lot for
Speaker 3: the creation of this website, and so I'll be in
Speaker 3: debt for in debt to him for quite a while.
Speaker 1: You know, you might want to throw a page on
Speaker 1: there that talks about your and if you already do,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but maybe a separate page that people
Speaker 1: can click on on the top inner that talks about
Speaker 1: your farming and stuff like that, because people will doublely
Speaker 1: support that if they know that you're you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, working on something that I hear you. You know, wholesome,
Speaker 1: you're feeding people, you know what I mean.
Speaker 3: Yep. I've had people show up at my farm after
Speaker 3: seeing interviews of mine online and just hand me one
Speaker 3: hundred dollars my hand and say great work, thank you
Speaker 3: very much. So, you know, people once they find out
Speaker 3: I'm a farmer, I think it's it really establishes me
Speaker 3: a little bit more in the minds of these people
Speaker 3: that I'm actually walking the walk, not just talking the talk.
Speaker 3: I think that we've identified, you know, some of the
Speaker 3: shortcomings of our modern society, and we're just trying to
Speaker 3: fill the void by telling the truth and you know,
Speaker 3: trying to embody journalistic integrity or forensic history while also
Speaker 3: growing great food break from the soil with no pesticides
Speaker 3: and secticides, because you can only think properly on a
Speaker 3: full stomach and a properly operating gut. So that's what
Speaker 3: we do. And yep, you can you can find us
Speaker 3: that Hills have Acre Farms on Facebook. That's about all
Speaker 3: we have. We do have a YouTube site, but we've
Speaker 3: just been so busy just trying to take care of
Speaker 3: the food that there really hasn't been time to is.
Speaker 1: It is it Hills half acre or is it like
Speaker 1: the Hills Like I could I couldn't have.
Speaker 3: Held Hell's half acre, as in the turn of phrase,
Speaker 3: like you're gonna be all over Hell's.
Speaker 1: Half acre, Oh, Hell's half acre, yep, because my.
Speaker 3: Wife Originally we were gonna be an urban farm, which
Speaker 3: meant leasing the backyards of like twenty twenty five different people,
Speaker 3: and so I was gonna ride my bike in between
Speaker 3: all these places and and instead we found a farm.
Speaker 3: But prior to that, when I told my wife, she said,
Speaker 3: you're gonna be all over Hills half acre doing this.
Speaker 3: You just named the farm. And so we are now
Speaker 3: in the process of amalgamating with another group of people
Speaker 3: like minded like us that have you know, got some
Speaker 3: funding and they're creating some incredible stuff and we're going
Speaker 3: to be moving our entire operation over with them next year. Yeah,
Speaker 3: so it was very positive. We haven't really talked too
Speaker 3: much about the farm. I've kind of wanted to keep
Speaker 3: it on the downlaw at the same time as well.
Speaker 3: So yeah, about where we want to be, you know,
Speaker 3: obviously more support, more help, even you know, what we've
Speaker 3: seen a lot of people do is bring us more information,
Speaker 3: bring us more sources, show us something that they found
Speaker 3: that's related, and so those contributions are huge too. So
Speaker 3: by all means continue to be you know, sending in
Speaker 3: more stuff where it shows that the mainstream is actually
Speaker 3: talking about Frankism and you know, some of these topics
Speaker 3: that we're not necessarily allowed to talk about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it's funny. I have an Instagram group,
Speaker 1: you know about Nick because Nick is our mutual friend.
Speaker 1: And then the Telegram and the Instagram people, they share
Speaker 1: a lot of things that end up becoming part of
Speaker 1: the show too. Because I one person who actually has
Speaker 1: you know, I have a family, an actual you know,
Speaker 1: self employed business and all that stuff. I couldn't watch
Speaker 1: all this stuff, and I wouldn't want to either because
Speaker 1: it hurts my head. So when people say send me things,
Speaker 1: it's very helpful, very very useful. That's a very good
Speaker 1: way contribute as well as just show me the information
Speaker 1: so I could break it down and see if there's
Speaker 1: anything there, you know.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and what you're helping is a true, intellectually honest
Speaker 3: pursuit of the truth. Here. We really want to get
Speaker 3: to the bottom of what happened in history, and so
Speaker 3: I think that we're getting pretty close to understanding what's
Speaker 3: going on, you know, the end of Scooby Doo. So
Speaker 3: they take the mask off and and so we're taking
Speaker 3: the mask off and who is it? But it seems
Speaker 3: to be Louis Brandeis and his progressive fathers.
Speaker 1: They would have gotten away with it too if it
Speaker 1: wasn't for Diego. Right, that's funny. It's crazy crime. Funny
Speaker 1: dog here right, yeah, exactly, right on. Oh, it's good times.
Speaker 1: That's that's cool. Thank you so much. I appreciate your time.
Speaker 1: Oh and uh, somebody's said something about keeping bees really
Speaker 1: turns the food up. Uh, my my family on my side,
Speaker 1: my my dad's side, bee keepers, oresters. Did you know
Speaker 1: did people that were rangers and all that stuff sold
Speaker 1: Christmas trees like that? We that's that's deep in our family.
Speaker 1: As far as being they were, they were German, so
Speaker 1: they had all kinds of artistic abilities to like I said,
Speaker 1: I can draw a little bit because of it, thank god. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's all good times.
Speaker 3: Absolutely well. I have to add to that that the
Speaker 3: people that support us by providing eggs and honey, they're
Speaker 3: also German. And the people that we've gotten together to create. Well,
Speaker 3: they they're artisans and they bake our bread for us,
Speaker 3: are sour tough bread to help you know, gut bacteria.
Speaker 3: They're also German, right, and they're of the same mind.
Speaker 1: And I think if we're if we're of any type
Speaker 1: of paler skinned group, we're probably all of the same
Speaker 1: at one point in history, regardless if we regionally call
Speaker 1: oursel something else. I think it's all coming from the
Speaker 1: same uh spout, the same faucet, you know.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and they are bee keepers too, and so what
Speaker 3: was the one of the first things I did was
Speaker 3: I got them to put their bees right across the
Speaker 3: street from our farm. It was ideal south, sort of
Speaker 3: facing just on the one side of the hill to
Speaker 3: help prevent the wind from blowing the bees too much.
Speaker 3: They were looking for this specific spot and I said, well,
Speaker 3: what about there. And they've been there ever since. So
Speaker 3: three or four years now we have actually a bee highway,
Speaker 3: a bee freeway. When you stand there in the middle
Speaker 3: of the summer, they're just going over your head and
Speaker 3: they're both they're going both ways, and they're going back
Speaker 3: and forth from the hives to the to the flowers
Speaker 3: on our farm. And when you're pulling pickling kukes or
Speaker 3: cherry tomatoes, you have to actually fight the beast to
Speaker 3: get get in and get what you need.
Speaker 1: That's awesome.
Speaker 3: So yeah, we understand that, and we're you know, the
Speaker 3: next place that we're going, they're also bee keepers and
Speaker 3: they are same like mind. They understand these things. So
Speaker 3: you know, we're looking for people like that in the
Speaker 3: clone area that's close to me. We we can use
Speaker 3: all kinds of people in this in this area too.
Speaker 3: We need people to start looking into how to preserve
Speaker 3: our own seeds, right, so we can close this circle.
Speaker 3: Yes we can grow, but can we preserve and contain
Speaker 3: our own seeds that work the next spring so that
Speaker 3: we are well developed, self contained individuals. So you know,
Speaker 3: there's all kinds of aspects that if you want to
Speaker 3: get involved in your in Colonna area, just drop by
Speaker 3: where we're at hellsalf Acre Farms and introduce yourself. And
Speaker 3: you know, this is how we're doing it. We're just
Speaker 3: worrying about creating relationships and it's it's turned out so
Speaker 3: incredibly well now and our you know a lot of
Speaker 3: the relationships that we've built kind of protects us too, right,
Speaker 3: insulates us from what's going on on the outside world. Right,
Speaker 3: you have people that are ranchers and they're raising their
Speaker 3: cattle and cutting their meat responsibly, and you know, doing
Speaker 3: all of those things. I think you know this is.
Speaker 1: Not a trucketarian anymore. If you ever were, most people are.
Speaker 3: You know. It's a great it's a great time for us,
Speaker 3: and so we're really happy, especially with the way it started.
Speaker 3: Me getting kicked off the farm, not even allowed on
Speaker 3: by two police escorts. Well, this is what I do
Speaker 3: in my meantime. When you're not allowing me on the farm,
Speaker 3: I'll go and create our future. So I haven't said
Speaker 3: too much. I want to say more, but I want
Speaker 3: it to be official and there and then.
Speaker 1: I'm yea happen and come to fruition before you get
Speaker 1: yeah statement.
Speaker 3: So like I'm I really want to say something, but
Speaker 3: I just can't. So I got to hold it out.
Speaker 3: But look forward to some really great information as far
Speaker 3: as our farm goes in the future. We'll let you
Speaker 3: guys know as soon as we can.
Speaker 1: Awesome, hey man, have a great week. I will send
Speaker 1: you the link for the next week. And for all
Speaker 1: of you out there, thank you for listening. Thank you
Speaker 1: for supporting and you know how to do it. We're
Speaker 1: still working on that computer thing. Just this thing is
Speaker 1: falling apart, so we got to work on that. But
Speaker 1: thank you so much everybody. Thank you doctor Mono for
Speaker 1: the for the donation today. I really greatly appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Thank you for listening, Doctor Monzo, thanks for taking your
Speaker 1: time out to do so, and everybody else too. All right,
Speaker 1: thank you, have a good day.
Speaker 3: See Mike.