Speaker 1: The following presentation is Adel Marvis Studio's production.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the fact Hunter Radio Network.
Speaker 3: Here is your host, George Hobbs.
Speaker 4: Welcome back truth seekers from around the world. It's time
for another edition of the fact Hunter podcast, as we
record on this Tuesday, March the eleventh, twenty twenty five,
March eleven. That's three eleven. There's your thirty three for
the week. And then we have Skull and Bones Day
just around the corner on March twenty second, So keep
an eye out. I hope everybody's doing all right, having
a great week. Hope you had a great weekend. We're
in for some very nice weather this week here in
the mid Atlantic region. I think we're getting close to
seventy today. So as soon as we are done here,
I'm rolling outside. Got a prep for the new chicks
that are coming here shortly. Meatbirds are new egg layers.
The chickens we have are closing in on four years old.
Reg Production is down. Still plenty to maintain us, but
it's it's down, and of course eggs are gold. Now
was it the commissary? They were eight fifty. I was
at a place called Redner's in Dover. They were nine
to fifty a dozen. It's incredible to see how much
twelve eggs cost. I had a listener from California, I believe.
Send me an email with a picture. I want to
say it was twelve to fifty for a dozen eggs
out there, InCred a dollar for one egg. Incredible questions, comments, concerns.
Where you'd like to join the podcast and share your thoughts,
please send us an email and the email addressed is
the fact Hunter at mail dot com. Again, it is
the fact Hunter at mail, not gmail dot com. The
website is the fact Unter dot com. I have done
very little there in the last month. I've posted once
a week with the radio show. Haven't been in the chatroom.
Things here have been so busy over the last month,
and they're they're just going to get busier as the
spring proceeds. So forgive me there for my lack of
interaction in the chat room. I hope everybody is able
to tune in live. If not, definitely check out the
replay when we drop it in the form as a podcast.
Our number one. This week on the radio show, I'm
going to be replaying an interview I conducted this past
Friday with a great gentleman from Western Pennsylvania, a fellow
OIF veteran, and we talk pretty in depth about chlorine dockside. Now, again,
as I always say, not a doctor, do your own research,
no matter what the subject is. Please take this information,
do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This
is the second time we've really done a series on
alternative medicine or exposing Rockefeller medicine. And you know, we
talked about the dangers of medicine becoming a business and
obviously healthy people are not a good business model. So
our number one a great discussion about chlorine dioxide, which
there's information everywhere out there about it, rumble, YouTube, tons
of journals, a lot of interesting things that happen in
twenty twenty that regarding chlorine dioxide. So definitely don't miss
our number one, whether you're listening live or on the
replay in the form of a podcast. There's only really
one thing I wanted to speak about before we got
before we kick off today's podcast, which is, of course,
the psychotropic medicine industry. So Trump made the decision to
go after Thomas Massey, literally the one guy in Congress
who was not controlled. That's the guy he decides to
go after. So he posted on his truth Social I
guess it's called yesterday Monday, March tenth, which, by the way,
the stock markets got absolutely obliterated yesterday. He says, thank
you to the House Freedom Caucus for just delivering a
big blow to the radical left Democrats and their desire
to raise taxes and shut down our country. They hate
America and all it stands for. That's why they allowed
millions of criminals to invade our nation. Sometimes it takes
great courage to do the right thing. Congressman Thomas Massey
of Beautiful Kentucky voted no on just about everything, despite
the fact that he has always voted for continuing resolutions
in the past. Trump doubles down. He says he should
be primaried and I will lead the charge against him.
He's just another grand stander who's too much trouble and
not worth the fight. Then he actually goes on to
compare Thomas Massey with Liz Cheney. He says he reminds
me of Liz Cheney before her historic record breaking fall.
The people of Kentucky won't stand for it. Just watch.
Do I have any takers? Anyway, thank you again to
that House Freedom Caucus for your very important vote. We
need to buy some time in order to make America
great again, greater than before unit and win out of
all the people this clown decides to go after. He
goes after Thomas Massey. And you know, truth seekers out
there know the real reason why Trump and his controllers
want Massy out of there. And this is your explanation
in less than sixty seconds.
Speaker 5: Everybody but me has an APAC person like that mean,
an APEC person. It's like your babysitter, your apack babysitter
who is always talking to you for APAC. They're probably
a constituent in your district. What they are firmly embedded
in a pack.
Speaker 4: And every member has someone like this.
Speaker 6: That's how it works on the Republican side.
Speaker 5: And when they come to DC, you go have lunch
with them, and they've got your cell number and you
have conversations with them.
Speaker 4: That's absolutely crazy.
Speaker 5: I've had four members of Congress say I'll talk to
my APAC person, and that's really.
Speaker 4: What we call them, my APAC guide. I'll talk to
my APAC guide.
Speaker 5: See if I can get to dial those ads back.
Speaker 4: Why if I never heard.
Speaker 5: This before, why would they want to tell their constituents
that they've basically got a buddy system with somebody who's
representing a foreign country. It doesn't benefit the congressman for
people to know that, so they're not going to tell you.
Speaker 4: That that's exactly why they want him gone. I was
encouraged by the comments on social media. To say this
backfired on Trump would be an understatement. However, the usual
suspects the again Trump. There's some things Trump would do
and people would still stand by his side, right, but
zion Don was really shredded by a lot of his
base for going after Massy. Massy is the one person.
He's got a sign on his door to his office
that says, if you're here to solicit me to send
money to your country, get out of here. I'm paraphrasing, obviously,
but google it you'll see it. He has a sign
that says, I'm not interested in sending our money overseas.
And unfortunately, there are still people like I said, We'll
stand by zion Don no matter what. And everyone is
starting to notice, even the most zombified sleepwalker are starting
to notice, well, why are we so? Why are we
sending all this money to Israel. Right, people are starting
to notice, So this is backfiring to a certain extent.
I think many of the people are understanding that he
is upon of Israel and Massy. The reason he's being
targeted is because he is the only Republican to refuse
Israel lobby money. So very interesting to see where this goes.
I think, uh, it was mostly rhetoric. He's going to
back I believe he's probably going to back down, and
you probably won't hear much of this going forward because
Massy is so popular and most people understand that he
is maybe one of two or maybe three people that
occupy Washington, DC that are worth anything, that actually care
about their constituents that they were elected to represent. And
a president, a federal you know, ruler going after a
state appointed individual who was voted by his constituents, telling
a state this is so mind blowing to me. I
wish people would take the time to break these things down. Right,
A federal government official is going after a state appointed
official and telling state con constituents to primary that guy
that they voted in. It's unbelievable. You know, this guy
represents the fourth district of Kentucky. He's a farmer. He's
an engineer. Did you know that Thomas Massey has over
thirty patents? Donald Trump is an actor and he is
an agent of the Rothschild's right. He was bailed out
in the eighties. He is an Appalachian American. And this
one really backfires. It sure did. So anyway, we'll keep
an eye on that. If there's any interesting developments. We'll
add to it on Thursday with the radio program, which
is live every Thursday at noon Eastern time. We're on Twitter, YouTube,
and Rumble and of course radiosoapbox dot com. By the way,
after we finish, conclude this chat with psychiatric medicine. Medicine
pardon me this psychotropic drug epidemic. I'm going to play
the last forty minutes of the documentary Making a Killing.
I played about the first fifteen minutes on the radio
program last Thursday. So what's the official explanation of psychotropics.
It's a psychoactive drug taken to exert an effect on
the chemical makeup of the brain and the nervouses. Thus,
these medications are used to treat mental illnesses. These are
medications typically made of synthetic chemical compounds and are usually
prescribed in psychiatric settings, potentially involuntary during commitment. Now, for
those who don't know, many of these psychotropic drugs have
very serious withdrawal symptoms. Since the mid twentieth century, such
medications have been leading treatments for a broad range of
mental disorders and have decreased the need for long term hospitalization,
which leads to their explanation of thereby lowering the cost
of mental health care. So they have taken away person
to person interaction, bonding, a supervised academia or a supervised environment.
I should say in many cases these type of settings
had active spaces for them to either paint or go
into a garden. And if you guys don't know what
I'm talking about, I'm talking about the psychiatric wards that
were prevalent in the eighteen hundreds. They started to die
down in the fifties and then by the eighties. I
think Reagan was the one who kind of ended them
right because they were like, well, we can just treat
them with a pill. That was the thought, and nothing
could be further from the truth. They're going to say
that the rehospitalization of the mentally ill is at a
high rate in many countries, and the reasons for relapses
are under research. So we're going to start with this
paper that was written by Lisa. I'm sorry, Lewis Miranda.
Today one hundred million people around the world are on
psychiatric drugs. How did we come to this? And that's
the documentary that you heard. That's how it starts off.
Over one hundred million around the world or on psychiatric drugs.
The largest medical conspiracy is not the one that causes
physical disease to hundreds, thousands or millions of people, but
the one that is set in motion to control the
minds of people, right, mk Ultra, what's the goal of that?
To control the minds of people? If you could do anything,
if you're evil and you want to take over the
world and you want people to act or react in
a certain fashion while then controlling one's mind is the
most powerful tool available and this is the one of
the ways they do that. So for a long time,
the psychotropic industry has not only made billions of dollars
a year through the sale of pharmaceutical products to quote
treat mental patients, but also knowingly and purposely has depleted
the minds of those who use such products. The way
in which psychiatry as a pseudoscience became relevant in modern
society is one story in itself. Large medical organizations, academia,
and powerful foundations are responsible for the adoption of quote
curing techniques that originated back in the early twentieth century,
which sought to treat patients with archaic, tortuous procedures that
were nothing more than live human experiments whose effectiveness were
based on nothing but hunches see lobotomies. With the advancement
of science, psychiatrs saw an opportunity to achieve the goal
they had not been able to achieve despite multiple trials
with their insane physical treatments. So this is like the
Jekyl Island version of psychotropics. So what happened back in
nineteen sixty seven the leading psychiatrists met in the island
of Puerto Rico, and what they did they conspired and
they came up with this plan of what they thought
was the best way to make people basically what they
called mental servants of the medical scientific pharmaceutical industry. So
their plan was to create, provide, and in some cases
even mandate people to take a whole new range of
psychotropic products that they'd recommend as the only solution for
a list of non existent mental diseases that people would
be made to believe they actually had. So during their meeting,
the so called medical experts and men of quote science
such as Heinz Lehmann, Joseph Zubin, Nathan Klein, Charles Savage,
and others, expressed their desire to control people's minds. They
produced a document this report that was called Psychotropic Drugs
in the year two thousand and That was their outline
for the future.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 4: This was their psychiatric project for new American century.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 4: The purpose of these psychiatrists were clear, as it was
expressed by Wayne Evans, quote, we see a developing potential
for nearly a total control of human emotional status, mental functioning,
and a will to act.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 4: What Evans described was the medical establishment's complete plan to
bring people under control with the use of pharmaceutical products
that would be pushed through trusted scientists, medical journals, and
ultimately with the help of medical doctors who were to
a great extent indoctrinated into believing the drugging. If you
really think about this, what is happening. They are drugging
someone for life, that's the best way to cure their
mental and in some cases physical illnesses. So they claim
that psychotropic drugs are used to treat problems like dementia, stress, depression,
and other mental conditions aren't safe at all. In fact,
they're responsible for a wide range of side effects, including violence, suicide, homicide,
and making patients addicted. Because, like I said earlier, there
are serious withdrawal issues with psychotropic drugs. In the best
case scenario, psychotropic drugs have managed to kill more people,
not help then then cure them of their physical ailments.
Their side effects are almost never studied before they are
put out, and the addiction they cause is simply referred
to as dependents. There's several papers I'm working on, you guys,
if you follow me on substack, the fact Hunter. Yesterday
I dropped the Bondi effect and how another case of
opium has come and gone. Go check that out. But
another paper I'm working on. Right, everybody's heard the veterans
twenty two a day, Right, twenty two veterans commit suicide
every day, Well, per capita, I would venture to say
that there's research out there that supports the phrase that
veterans use more psychotropic drugs if you will use you know, say,
per capita than any other demographic. And that's also the
same group that has the highest rate of suicide. People
think that most veterans commit suicide because of things they
saw in combat. In some cases that is correct, But
I have seen some cases in my military career that
made no sense to me whatsoever, And I know some
of these people were prescribed psychotropic drugs. Something to think
about and something I hope to have posted here in
the next month on my substack. So again, psychotropic drugs,
which are legally sold and recommended by health practitioners, are
responsible for more deaths than illegal street drugs. According to research,
over half of the people who commit suicide in the
United States are patients or users of psychotropic drugs prescribed
to them that the short list includes Zoloft, Paxel, Prozac, Wellbutrin, Fixer,
Sarah Quill, Ultram, and others. Multiple reports in the multiple
reports in the media have pointed out abuse of these
psychotropic drugs by soldiers who are sent to the battlefield,
even though they are mentally unprepared to face the reality
brought to them when in combat situations. I would argue
that it's very hmm, what words should I use to
describe this? Unethical? Comes to mind. Unethical to send a
soldier to the battlefield while under the influence of psychotropic drugs,
because these drugs manipulate your mind, and these people are
holding M force M two four nines, right, two forty charlies,
two forty bravos. Something to think about, right. Psychotropic drugs
are even given to soldiers as a way to mentally
flush their brains and eliminate any fear, phobia or intolerance
to the crude reality of a combat zone so they
can be deployed three, four or more times or in
my case seven and I'm perfectly normal, look at me.
Psychotropic drugs are responsible for military suicides, and warnings about
the consequences of their use have been issued by psychiatrists themselves,
the ones not committed to use using the prescription drugs
to cure anything in everything. Unfortunately, just like vaccines that
the actual doctors who come out against these things are
foreign few between, right, we know that, but they've said
that the risk from side effects is too great. The
calls to stop using prescription drugs to make soldiers tolerant
to the stress of the battlefield have become louder and louder. Quote,
there's no way on earth that these boys and girls
are getting monitored on the field. And I can tell
you that is one thousand percent true. They are not
they get I'm here to tell you, folks, they would
give us. I'm trying to remember. I'm trying to be
as accurate as possible with this old brain of mine.
I think we deployed with ninety days of pills in
our pocket. Ninety days. And that's from doctor Peter Bregan.
He says, the drugs simply shouldn't be given to soldiers.
And this is like everything else. It doesn't cure depression,
it hides it. Eventually. What I decided was all the
things that I was suffering from I had to deal with, right,
all of us dealt with it, whether it was marijuana
or alcohol or these pills that just hides it temporarily.
At some point you have to deal with these things
that cause you were oppression, that cause you know, your guilt.
And that's where the spiritual part of my life came in.
I wouldn't be where I was today if I just
tried to ignore my problems. Right that That's why the
Truth community was so important to me, realizing how the
world really worked and how people are manipulated every day,
the masses. And I could either you know, hide in
my little corner and feel bad for myself, or we
could one you know, absolve ourselves, ask for forgiveness, move
forward and share the truth with the masses. Right, And
we're not all built the same. We all have personal
struggles that we deal with every day. Right that there
is no one way for getting over the things that
burden you. You know, obviously number one is accepting Christ into
your heart. But as far as processing the things that
burden you. And again, people maybe they go to the
doctor and the doctor say how you feel in and
you'll say, I don't know, I'm just stressed out. And
then he hands you a business card to a fellow
psychiatrist and then he labels you, well you're depressed. Well
that's okay, I have anti depressants. And for me, and
I understand this affects everyone differently. It zombified me. It
made me emotionless. And to think that that people you know,
soldiers downrange on these drugs. Right, what are drugs? What
is marijuana? It alters your mind. Well, what are psychotropics?
They all through your mind. It is a dangerous, dangerous cocktail.
But the use and abuse of psychotropic drugs doesn't, of course,
just happen in the army. Right. There's this misconception out
there that PTSD only applies to soldiers, of course, not
first responders, people who've been in bad accidents. It's just
people who have had significant events in their life. They
may have nightmares, they think about it, it depresses them.
It happens to everybody in life, right, and everybody has
different thresholds. But it also happens in mental institutions, which
in most cases are places filled with in many cases,
people who were forced by their doctors. Some people are
imprisoned in these places for their own good, and they're
submitted to take long and pain medical treatments that include
the intake of prescription drugs for the rest of their lives. Folks,
I've known people who were on these drugs for twenty
thirty years, and they're not the same people who I
knew back then. I mean, listen, we're not all the
same people. But you understand what I'm saying, right, Many
of these patients are children, and that's the thing I've
always had a problem with. You're interfering with the serotonin
and the brain development of a child whose brain is developing.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 4: We hear stories that you know, men aren't developed until
in some cases mid twenties, right, And you're altering that
that is so dangerous and it's so unethical, and we
allowed it. Well, Johnny's sitting in class and he's he's
tapping his feet and he just can't sit still. Well, duh,
he's seven years old. You gave him a giant bowlo
of fruity pebbles and a sugar filled orange juice. You
send them off to school. He's a seven year old
boy who wants to run around and play and maybe
the teacher is just super boring. But what do you do?
What's the answer to that? Instead of making classes more
interactive with more physical activity, which children need, what do
you do? We label them and we send them to
the doctor. And many of these children, unfortunately become labrats
in a mental institution where they're loaded with psychotropic drugs
that are often in their experimental phase, right, in order
to calm down or in theory element the origin of
the trouble pointed out by the medical expert. Children as
young as seven, whether they're suffering from neglect, abuse, or
who simply were not raised by two parents, are prescribed
antipsychotic drugs for the rest of their lives. And the
problem many of these children when they start taking it
at early age, it becomes a part of their daily routine, so, oh,
I gotta go get my pills, and they just continue
to do so because once again, the withdrawal is real. Right.
They're taught that only the continuous use of pharmaceutical drugs
will take them out of their supposed mental illness. Drugs
like lexapro vivants are responsible for children's suicide. Others are
prescribed symbics. Maybe it's called symbix s Ynbyax. Symbix a
drug that supposedly works as an antidipressant antidepressant pardon me,
even though it's labeled clearly states that it could lead
to suicide. Why would any parent put a pill in
their child's mouth that could possibly lead them to take
their own life. You have over one hundred million people
around the world who are on these drugs. How did
we get here? How did we come to this? Their
doctors convince them that we're well, we're mentally sick. They
talk them into believing that every mental or emotional experience
was an example of a mental or emotional disease. And listen,
I am fully cognizant of the fact that people go
through some very evil and emotional things in their life, right,
and I'm not one to judge how a person should
cope with their issues. We've all many of us have
seen terrible things in our life, experienced terrible things in
their life. But they've been told that stress, anxiety, depression,
and every other reaction to their life experience it was
a treatable disease and they had the solutions and the
cure for them. Right. Although more and more psychiatrists confess
that their profession lacks the science they claim to have,
that their analysis and treatment of patients is a trial
and error process. When they are in front of their patients,
many of these professionals do not hesitate to recommend drugs
that will only worsen worsen any mental or physical medical problem.
We don't have any blood tests or any other medical
tests that are definitive for any mental disorder. That came
right out of the mouth of a psychiatrist from New Jersey.
This statement was similar to what another psychiatrist from Mexico
City said, quote, if you come to my office and
tell me you're depressed, there's no medical or blood test,
you will simply be prescribed drugs. And again, if you
heard part one of making a killing, the Untold story
of psychotropic drugs, which I played in our one of
the radio show last Thursday, which I think was what
episode three thirty one, maybe the first fifteen minutes. They
interviewed a few psychiatrists. Yeah, there's no tests. We just
asked them with they're depressed, talk to them and I
try to match, you know, their symptoms with what pill
best would serve them. And it's a big business. Even
when psychiatrists and drug makers know that their products have
dangerous side effects and that the scientific base of the
manufacturing of these products is faulty, to say the least,
they have no problem whatsoever to wake up every morning
to go to their office and recommend pharmaceutical drugs for
their unsuspecting patients. Many of these patients often become part
of the list of at least three thousand people a
month who died directly because of the use of psychotropic drugs.
Many people were shocked on September eleventh, two thousand and one,
when around three thousand people were murdered during the terrorist
attacks in York in Pennsylvania, most people failed to realize
that as bad as nine to eleven was, the kind
of crime committed that day is actually replicated monthly, or
perhaps more often by doctors describing perscribing pardon me, pharmaceutical
drugs to their patients. According to publicly available data, seventy
percent of the psychotropic drugs used by people with supposed
mental disease are prescribed by their trusted medical doctors. Remember
back then, when they first started this in the sixties,
there was about forty four different products. Today two hundred
the top five pharmaceutical drugs sold around the world, bringing
about eighteen billion dollars for big pharma every year. Right,
this is about the same amount obtained when we add
up the GDP of half of the nations around the world.
As a whole, the psychi psychiatric industry makes a grand
total of around three hundred and thirty billion dollars a year.
That is almost half a trillion dollars. Again, it is
a big, big business. There's a paper that I am
going to cite in the show notes from the NIH.
I'm sorry, the National Library of Medicine, which is part
of the NIH Trends in Psychotropic Drug Implicated Mortality. Three
Brave authors Brian Kelly, Laura Frizell, and Mike Voolo wrote
this article and it is uploaded in the NIH National
Library of Medicine, and it talks about that drug overdoses
have contributed to considerable years of life lost. However, focusing
solely on drug overdoses, whereby drug poisoning defines the underlying
cause of death, obscures the wider burden of the drug
mortality crisis. We aim to describe twenty one years of
trends in psychotropic drug implicated deaths. So this is where
psychotropic drugs are a major contributing factor to the cause
of death. And they're looking from nineteen ninety nine to
twenty nineteen twenty one years. Okay, so over twenty one years,
fifty one thousand, four hundred and forty six psychotropic drug
implicated deaths occurred. That was close to thirty four thousand
medical and eighteen thousand external both medical and external psychotropic
drub InCom implicated deaths, pardon me, rose dramatically, increasing between
two and a half and five times. Diseases of the
circulatory system predominated underlying clauses of medical deaths. So these
things have a serious negative effect on a human circulatory system.
Then there's non drug suicide transport accidents, which means cause
it affected them while they were driving and they had
car accidents, and drownings. Psychotropic drugs account for like seventy
four percent of drownings. It's I think I saw this.
I can't cite it. I saw a number somewhere that
between psychotropic drugs and alcohol well over too thors. So
maybe that that seventy five percent was with the both
of them combined, right, because there's accidents, et cetera. But
psychotropic drugs played a large part in drownings. So the
drug mortality crisis extends beyond overdoses and may temper improvements
observed within other causes of mortality, and again cardiovascular disease.
Psychotropic drugs are attributed to a large part of that. Right.
It's a very I'm not going to read the whole paper,
but it is very very interesting read because everyone knows
about how opioids have been a primary driver for overdoses
right a big time, But nobody talks about the psychotropic
drug effect with these underlying diseases and how it can
debilitate people physically, and people need to be aware of that. Okay,
maybe this pill does help you. Are you aware of this, this,
and this? Right, we talk about when you go to
get a vaccine. How many times has your doctor ever
read you the insert before you got a vaccine. I'm
willing to bet never. So how many times, if anybody's listening,
including myself, you've been described at some point in your
life a psychotropic drug. Now, there's a good chance the
doctor said you might experience this or this, but he
probably only says two things. And if you have any
issues with it, call me and I'll find another one.
Don't worry. Right, we've got lexipro. If that doesn't work,
we've got this one that that doesn't work. They literally
that's what they told me. That doesn't work. It makes
you to tire to Okay, try this one. I have
no idea. It's incredible. It's like pez dispensers and they
make tons of money from the military. But this story
is really incredible. And the interesting one is part three
point one, age adjusted death rates over time. So this
chart shows trends in all deaths and by medical and
external causes of death in which a psychotropic drug was
implicated and they represent age adjusted death rates per one
hundred thousand. So basically, from nineteen ninety nine to twenty nineteen, again,
the rate of annual psychotropic drug implicated medical deaths increased
two and a half times. During the same period, the
rate of annual psychotropic drub implicated external deaths increased by
five times. These trends, these trends are significantly and statistically
incredible to look at. And again, in these cases, these
are cases where psychotropic drugs were noted as a contributing
cause as a death. And again, how of these? How
many of these go unnoticed when somebody has a heart
attack and I don't know that this guy's on medicine
or whatever. Very interesting article, and I hope people take
the time to read it. Lastly, the twelve Dangers of
Psychoactive Drugs written by Rebecca Edwards Beck in February of
twenty eighteen. Not going to get into all of the
individual ones, but it's interesting even if the name is
not familiar psychotropic or psychiatric drugs. There are many classes
of them. By the way, you have antidepressants anti anxiety
self explanatory, then you have your eighty HD anti psychotics.
You have mood stabilizers, anti panic agents, anti obsessive agents.
That's interesting. And of course the real heavy ones right
antipsychotics are heavy and hypnotics, which are basically sedatives right,
knock you out. One in six American adults reported taken
a psychiatric drug in twenty thirteen, one in six, and
while thirteen percent of the population takes an antidepressant, almost
one in four women ages fifty to sixty four take
at least one pretty alarming statistics. Because there are many
dangers of psychotropic drugs, which we've mentioned, the question must
be asked if the benefits of these mind altering and
as mentioned, physically altering, right, behavior changing medications outweigh the risks,
and that's something every individual has to weigh for themselves.
I'll never tell you all what to do. Do your
own research. Like we said at the beginning, we're not doctors.
Do your own research, come to your own conclusions. But
to go further, you've got to question the possibility of
unethical financial underpinnings of the pharmaceutical industry, which we've made
very plan and clear with vaccines. So number one the
twelve dangers is side effects and withdraw symptoms. And I
think many people are aware because of the television that
most drugs, including psychotropics, they come with a laundry list
of serious side effects. Right. However, even doctors begin to
wonder if the risks are worth it. For example, the
Copenhagen trial unit in Denmark reviewed SSRIs for depression and
their related side effects. They concluded that SSRIs might have
statistically significant effects on depressive systems, but all trials were
high risk of bias and the clinical significance seems questionable.
SSRIs significantly increase the risk of both serious and non
serious adverse events. The potential of small beneficial effects seemed
to be largely outweighed by the harmful side effects. And
I'm not going to spend the next fourteen minutes reading
all the side effects of everything, because and again I'll
put in the show notes if you want to go
through everything from nausea, weight gain ed, blurred vision, I mean,
it's everything. I mean, it's incredible. I'm still scrolling trying
to get through this to the next one. Number two
increased risk of suicide, which we've already talked about. That
is a serious one. Obviously, For several years after the
dawn of SSRIs the pharmaceutical companies who own them insisted
that the reports of suicide and connection with those medications
were false and they were linked to only the fact
that these individuals were simply depressed before even taking the medication.
And that was their argument. How evil is that? Right?
It was depression that led to taking their own lives. Finally,
in a quote dear healthcare professional letter that was released
in May of two thousand and six by Glaxo Smith Klein,
it was admitted that peroxetine one SSRI could potentially worsen
the risk of suicide, particularly in young people. And you know,
I've seen many documentaries about this and the parents interviewed.
It's heartbreaking, it's awful. And of course they didn't write
that letter until after many lawsuits, hearings and battles and
all of that, Like they basically had to do it right.
But the sad thing is, again this was two thousand
and six, there were evidence that suggests that at least
some drug manufacturers were aware of these risks going back
to nineteen eighty Eli Lilly or Evil Lily as I
call them. The manager manufacturer, a parton me Fluexitine brands,
was found to have lost documents. Where did they go
like the NASA, Well, we'd go back to the moon,
but we lost all that technology. You know. It was
spring cleaning up nineteen seventy three and Jim grabbed the
wrong bin and he threw out the instructions on how
to go back to the moon. But their story was
that they have lost documents relating to the drug's propensity
to cause both suicidal thoughts and violent behavior. These documents
were withheld in a relevant case in which the manufacturer
was consulted about a workplace killer Joseph Wesbecker, who began
taking the medication shortly before becoming violent. Some evil stuff
in this world, folks, and the healthcare industry and its
big brother proponents are all the same. They do not
care about the little man, and they will not put
out dear healthcare professional letters until they absolutely positively have
no other choice. Some other just disturbing stories that the
pharmaceutical industry knew about but without because of the money
they made another big one, heart problems, right, a big
common side effect amongst many psychotropic drugs, including all classes
of antidepressants and some antipsychotic drugs. Big problem. I'm not
going to get too much into that. But then number
four and this is a big one. Well, they're all
big ones, right, What am I saying? They're all big
ones pregnancy and birth complications. So in twenty twelve, plos
one reported that women were more likely to experience pregnancy
and childbirth complications when prescribed psychotropic medications, particularly in early pregnancy.
The complications list included mess carriages, paranatal death, still birth
right in a higher likelihood of terminating pregnancy. Women with
who were diagnosed with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and all other
psychotic disorders were excluded due to the nature of their conditions.
So there was a twenty ten massive review by the
Swedish Birth Register.
Speaker 9: This in.
Speaker 4: Almost fifteen thousand women and infants, and they were able
to find an association between antidepressant treatment and the following
high rates of C section berths, increased pre term birth rate,
pre existing diabetes, chronic hypertension, congenital heart defects and infants,
higher congenital malformation rate, and the researchers complete. That is
a huge test. Fifteen thousand, right, Sometimes you know we'll
get reports. So we polled ninety four people. We polled
one hundred and eighty seven people. You know, this is
fifteen thousand women and fifteen thousand. This is thirty thousand humans.
Women using antidepressants during pregnancy and their newborns have increased pathology.
It is not clear how much of this is due
to drug use or underlying pathology. Use of TCAs was
found to carry a much higher risk than other antidepressants,
and peraxeitine seems to be associated with a specific terotogenic property,
which is an agent that can cause problems in fetal development.
Right And finally, in two thousand and five, the major
brand of paroxetine was required to list an a warning
on packaging warning of birth defects. Number five violent behavior.
In November two thousand and two, Fox News reporter Douglas
Kennedy conducted a three part series on the connection between
antidepressants and ADHD medications and violent behavior. Over the following
decade and a half, he's recounted to the public many
stories of young people committing violent x, most often school shootings,
and I think that was part of the conspiracy realm
with Columbine goes on to say that thirty three percent
of child in adolescent subjects in one study who were
on Atomics eighteen atomics ateen, which is a stimulant prescribed
for ADHD, exhibited extreme irritability, of aggression and hypomania. The
European Medicines Agency issued a press release in two thousand
and five stating that suicide related behavior and aggression hostility
were more common in children who were on anti depressions
versus those who are on a placebo. And it goes
on and on and on, big numbers in many cases.
Number six it's how to fix it? Even makes your
mental illness worse? Yes, I said that correctly. It is
possible that psychotropic medications are actually worsening and contributing to
the rise in mental illness diagnosis. Incredible number seven car accidents.
I know it sounds odd, but individuals taking antidepressants, I
think specifically Benzo die is it beans and Z drugs
these aganists used to treat insomnia, they have a much
higher chance of getting into motor vehicle accidents according to
multiple studies, and it's interesting that these results are particularly
true for people over sixty five and they actually get
worse with higher doses of these medications. Another is poor
immune function, which is interesting, right you see an uptick
of people getting sick all the time. It's possible that
taking antidepressants can suppress your immune system. Then number nine
it talks about drug abuse and addiction. In some people,
legal psychotropic drugs are associated with higher rates of illicit
drug use and dependence. Number ten it gets into sexual dysfunction.
Leave it at that. Number eleven elevated risk of breast cancer,
and number twelve diabetes, which is interesting because what do
we have a problem with in this country. Diabetes. For
over a decade, it's been suspected that psychoactive drugs used
to treat serious mental illness such as schizophrenia and related psychoses,
may be connected to diabetes. Researchers reviewed available data in
two thousand and eight and found that there is not
a correlation between serious mental illness itself and the development
of diabetes. However, there is a significant, it is potentially significant,
pardon me, connection between the drug men the treat let
me try that again. There is potentially significant connection between
the drug treatment used. So there's at least one study
out there that has directly associated the antipsychotic oln zappine
lanzapine with more frequent occurrence of diabetes symptoms. And then
you know, in closing, I'm not going to get in
this whole thing. This was written by John Blosser just
a couple of months ago, and I should have spent
time on this one because this is I don't ever
like to see anyone taking advantage of. But when children
are taken advantage of by a system, right, whether it
be a foster system or a medical system, I get
very angry, as I suppose many of you do as well.
But there is a serious problem. They are pushing psychotropic
drugs on all of the foster children because you know,
these children get screened and of course they're dealing with issues.
They're foster children, So what do they do? And in
many cases, sadly, I'm assuming here parents are all for it.
A mister Smith, who is you know, mister Smith's a
foster parent. You know, Johnny just came from a difficult situations,
a little worked up. Would you be okay if we
gave them something to cool them out a little bit
and and kind of you know, level them off mentally
and calm him down. Oh sure, right, he's this child
is in his house as a foster kid. He's more
than happy for that child to get pills to calm
him down. This is a serious epidemic, and the abuse
is found in foster care and elsewhere that you know.
These new numbers are coming out all the time. There
are some reports that have come out in a quarter
four of twenty twenty four that are stating that over
six million children are prescribed these psychotropic trugs. Over four
hundred thousand of them are five years old or younger.
But the most abhorrent thing is no one is tracking
the side effects, no one. Right. These are not flintstone vitamins,
They're not cherry flavored cough drops. These are mind altering,
heavyweight psychotropics. And unfortunately this is the truth. They are
not prescribed to help these children, but to control them, right,
to make them more tractable and less challenging. Now, take
what I just said, right, All too often they're not
prescribed to help children, but to control them, to make
them more tractable and less challenging. Now, think what they're
doing to us, right, They don't want to help us,
they want to control us. I want us to be
less challenging. So we're about it the hour mark that
I will have these stories linked in the show notes.
Please do take the time to especially read the one
on Freedom magazine dot org written by John Blasser that
talks about the abuses, including the psychotropic industry on foster children. Right,
they don't really have any defense mechanisms. And again I'm
not there are some great foster parents out there, but
in many cases they think that the doctor's trying to
help them by giving these pills. Right, these are drugs.
These are drugs. Drugs alter the minds. And I get
very upset in many cases when it comes to just
passing these out to children who have a little bit
of excitement in them, and I think it can very
much have life altering.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 4: You know, it can change their life forever. Some of
these things you can't fix. So uh, I want to
stop there for the next half an hour, maybe forty
minutes or so. Again, this is a documentary called The
Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugs. I'll play it for you.
Is pretty audio friendly and I'll leave the link that
where it is on YouTube, So if you'd like to
watch it and share it with others for more than
welcome to I'd like to thank you all for your
continued support. Take this information, do your own research, come
to your own conclusions. Please don't miss hour one of
the radio program on Thursday. Here is that documentary.
Speaker 10: How many people do you know who have been diagnosed.
Speaker 11: With the mist disorder?
Speaker 4: One with the mental disorder.
Speaker 7: Two?
Speaker 12: I'm sure a couple.
Speaker 3: I know a few, yeah, full personally probably forward, I'll.
Speaker 4: Say about nine, at least a dozen.
Speaker 3: I'll bet I could count, but I personally know.
Speaker 4: My oldest son is diagnosed, my.
Speaker 3: Mother was diagnosed.
Speaker 13: Kid from my childhood, just my grandfather and cousins.
Speaker 1: A friend of my friends sit there, neighbors.
Speaker 14: A girlfriend, my mother, all my friends, everybody I know.
Speaker 6: An apparent flood of mental illness is all around us.
Where is this coming from? Psychiatrists who's diagnosed against statistical
manual can label anyone walking the earth today as mentally ill.
Speaker 15: Psychiatrists I believe they look at every human being and
they divide humans into two classes, clients and potential clients.
Speaker 16: We see This no more prevalent in any field than
in the field of the mental disorders, where one disease
after or another is invented and then popularized and the
public is made to worry about it.
Speaker 17: It's in disease mongering.
Speaker 4: It's the selling of sickness.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 18: Sometimes it's a drug in search of a market, and
it's given public awareness to minor conditions with.
Speaker 4: The ultimate goal is to sell more medications.
Speaker 3: It's not caring for people.
Speaker 14: When you run out of symptoms, you don't have any
more clientele to market to, so you have to invent disease.
And with psychiatric medications you can invent diseases all day long.
Speaker 1: Look at human variation everyday, things like shyness, sadness, or
even a situational depressions like grieving postpartum depression. They all
become studied and prescriptions start to get written for these drugs.
Speaker 19: Before these drugs were introduced in the market, people who
have these conditions would not have been given any drug
at all.
Speaker 3: And so it is the.
Speaker 19: Branding of a disease, and it is the branding of
a drug for the treatment of a disease that did
not exist before the industry made the disease.
Speaker 6: Chise in point shyness, a common life situation voted by
psychiatrists into their diagnostic and Statistical manual under the name
social anxiety disorder.
Speaker 20: You know, people are nervous while they come up with
a social anxiety disorder SAD.
Speaker 3: They'll call it SAD.
Speaker 19: And the connotation is that everybody ought to be happy,
and that here's a drug that can make you happy.
So that a common occurrence, which is every now and again,
everybody's sad, we ought to be treating with a drug.
Speaker 20: Well, then they'll get this PR firm to drum up
business for this. They'll put out all these studies that find,
you know, there's so many people afflicted with this SAD,
you know, and they'll start putting it in magazines, they'll
start putting it on TV. They'll start a patient aviacy
group that say, you know that we're all affected by this.
And then they'll come out with Paxel works for this.
So they go to the FBA and they said, well,
we ran this study and this works for this new
invented disorder, and that is SAD social anxiety disorder, and
millions of people suffer from it and it's purely fictional.
It's a normal human emotion that everybody experiences at certain
times or another, but they make it into a disease.
Speaker 2: Paxel once it got approved by the FDA as the
first antidepressant to be used for social anxiety, it took
off huge and it just moved from number three in
the market amongst it's pure drugs to number one in
the market.
Speaker 6: Social anxiety disorder is just one of many made up
psychiatric disorders fueling the boom and psychotropic drug prescription.
Speaker 2: Psychiatrists work to promote what the latest.
Speaker 3: Disease is going to be.
Speaker 2: These days, bipolar is getting that same type of promotion.
Speaker 21: Everybody's being educated about their bipolar illness, when in fact
we know having emotional ups and downs is distinctly human.
Speaker 7: Now bipolar is thrown around like water. You've got bipolar.
I have bipolar. I'm up today, I'm manic. If I
go home tonight, I'm depressed because I'm tired. I'm not
shows I have bipolar disease. It's a lot of hopem
Have you.
Speaker 22: Ever worried, with seeing all the increased media on it,
that you might have a mental disorder?
Speaker 3: Yes? And which one is that?
Speaker 23: I would say bipolar. You know, they talk about bipolar
a lot.
Speaker 4: Bipolar.
Speaker 24: I've known a lot of bipolar.
Speaker 11: Two friends, both of them were like diagnosed with bipolar.
Speaker 3: My neighbor she was bipolar.
Speaker 12: I was diagnosed with bipolar.
Speaker 4: My mother had bipolar.
Speaker 10: It was actually bipolar, chizophrenic, bipolar, bipolar, and obsessive compulsive bipolar.
Speaker 4: They're an ADHD bipolar disorder, bipolar situation.
Speaker 25: Bipolar, bipolar, bipolar, bipolar, bipolar. There are three personality disorders,
and then the most recent is bipolar, and that's just
been in.
Speaker 24: The past year.
Speaker 6: Spearheading the popularizing of bipolar disorder, especially in children, is
psychiatrist doctor Joseph Biederman, a paid speaker, advisor, and researcher
for twenty five different drug companies.
Speaker 20: In nineteen ninety six. The drug companies funneled all this
money to this doctor. Biederman is well known. He's the
one that came up and said that there's bipolar disorder
in little kids. This was unheard of. There was no
bipolar disorder in any kids. He came up with the
study and published the articles out all over the world,
and other doctors followed his lead. That bipolarism little kids.
Speaker 6: Due to the constant promotion by doctor Biterman and his colleagues,
there has been a four thousand percent increase of the
diagnosis of bipolar in children since nineteen ninety four, while
the number of antipsychotics prescribed to them has leaked fivefold
to an estimated two point five million prescriptions. In two
thousand and eight, doctor Biederman was exposed by a Senate
investigation for failing to report one point six million dollars
in personal income from pharmaceutical companies, but the damage had
been done because of the bipolar fad created by doctor Biederman. Antipsychotics,
some of the most powerful psychotropic drugs being prescribed, are
psychiatry's drug of choice. The top three best selling antipsychotics
together grows twenty five thousand dollars every minute.
Speaker 4: And no matter.
Speaker 6: How big the psychotropic drug industry gets, psychiatrists are hard
at work providing the diagnoses to make it even bigger.
Speaker 25: Let's see, this is the pie right here of the
of a certain class of medications, and this is a
pretty profitable pie, and everybody wants a piece of that pie.
But what would happen if we made that pie even bigger.
And how you make the pie even bigger is by
expanding the uses.
Speaker 3: For those drugs.
Speaker 14: They've already got a drug that's approved on the shelf,
they can just pull it off the shelf and rename it,
repackage it, and say, look, we've got a new drug
for a new illness.
Speaker 15: When Prozac's patent ran out, that Eli Liley had to
look for a new source of profits. So all they
did was change the name of the drug from Prozac
to seraphim, changed the color of the pill from green
to pink, and marketed it for PMDD, which is newly
introduced into this book.
Speaker 26: What it tells us is that if you can come
up with a label, a diagnostic label for a drug,
then you can sell it like hotcakes.
Speaker 14: It's a business model, and it's a billion dollar business model,
and it works, and it's going to keep continuing.
Speaker 6: Today, anyone may unknowingly be taking a psychiatric drug renamed, repackaged,
and prescribed for non psychiatric purposes. The ziban, prescribed as
a cure for smoking, is actually the antidepressant Wellbutrin. Symbalta,
a psychiatric drug for depression and anxiety, is now being
marketed as yendrieve for urinary incontinence. Psychiatric researchers are testing
psychotropic drugs on such wildly varying conditions as obesity, alcoholism, gambling,
hot flashes, purpies, nausea, witching, shivering, and excessive hair pulling.
It is a pill for every ill and practically no
one is being told how dangerous psychiatric drugs are.
Speaker 14: As a chemist, I'm making these drugs. They're proving deadly
in our labs and approving daily in other labs, dangerous, ineffective,
causing the exact same thing they're supposed to treat.
Speaker 4: How are they selling them?
Speaker 23: For anyone who's given a label of a psychotic illness,
drugs seem to be the automatic choice of treatments as
Nightfallow's day.
Speaker 15: That's all psychiatry does. It's dominated by psychopharmacologists who do
nothing but managed symptoms by dispensing pills. That's it, And
they don't work. But the fact that they don't work
works to the advantage of the drunk companies and the psychiatrists,
which means that you're not cured, which means that you're
a patient for life, you're a customer, you're a client
for life. And the worse your health gives, the more
drugs you need, it's a great deal for them.
Speaker 24: We should all be up in arms about the way
we're being treated by psychiatry today. It's a very dangerous
industry that has gone so far overboard in inventing fictitious
diseases and drugging our children, our population that I consider
it to be engaged in crimes against humanity.
Speaker 6: With over eighty billion dollars a year in psychiatric drug
money at stake, it is impossible to escape the saturation
of psychiatric disease mongering in today's society. But behind the
marketing lurks a secret. Psychiatry's customers would be shocked to
learn how are these drugs tested and are they safe?
Speaker 15: And no one knows precisely how the Psychiatric Medications Act.
Speaker 27: We don't know if I give you a medication, if
it is going to work or not.
Speaker 28: It's not a great deal of scientific support for using them.
Speaker 4: By myself.
Speaker 29: I try to pick a drug whose side effects might
be useful.
Speaker 3: You have to choose what is the best option.
Speaker 4: We don't have the sure metals, there are no rules.
Speaker 24: Every thing is it's an art.
Speaker 4: Really, often's trial and error.
Speaker 3: It's a kind of a trial and arry. It's a
trial and error some degree trial and error.
Speaker 23: I guess a blind man's blood for something like that,
you never know if it's the right drug.
Speaker 30: It's a much more complex subject.
Speaker 4: There's always got to be huge surprises, and that's what
makes it so difficult.
Speaker 19: The best psychiatrists in a world will mess up all
the time.
Speaker 24: The American public is being treated as a mass medical experiment.
We are all being treated like guinea pigs by the
pharmaceutical companies, the psychiatric industry, and the FDA.
Speaker 8: They are basically testing drugs on large parts of the
population without really knowing what the results they're going to be.
Speaker 29: It's a very dire situation that we're facing. We're talking
about people's health and in many situations, people's lives. These
are very serious issues.
Speaker 6: As dangerous chemical compounds. Psychotropic drugs are tightly regulated by
governments throughout the world, and for any new psychotropic drug
to be approved for use, it must undergo tests intended
to protect the public.
Speaker 18: When a pharmaceutical company develops a new drug that they
want to send to the market, what they do is
they have to run it through clinical trials. They have
to be able to provide to the FDA safety data
to say this is a safe and effective drug.
Speaker 2: In clinical trials, psychiatrists are engaged to do the research,
and we could bank on the fact that these psychiatrists
are tied to the pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 10: And the psychiatry puts their name on there. They're seen
as an expert. You're talking mental drugs, who writes them,
it's psychiatrists, So that's that works.
Speaker 31: It's a terrible system.
Speaker 32: The desperate thing about it is it's all dressed up
in the name of science. There's no science until it's
it's pure marketing. But they get away with it because
it's called science.
Speaker 24: There's really no test, no X ray, there's no chemist
that shows you have this condition. It's really just the
opinion of someone who is probably taking money from pharmaceutical
companies to prescribe drugs to people.
Speaker 12: Where's the biochemistry, where's the research, where's the substantiation? And
the answer is it vaporizes life missed in the morning.
Speaker 3: It's not there.
Speaker 6: But the lack of scientific testing doesn't stop psychiatrists from
carrying out clinical trials on dangerous drugs. Clinical trials are
supposed to consist of four phases of precise scientific drug testing,
the first three of which must be submitted to governments
for regulatory approval. In Phase one, the drug is checked
for toxicity. In Phase two, tests are done to see
how the drug reacts in the human body. If it
clears this hurdle, then a phase three trial is carried out,
but with no lab tests verifying or measuring any mental disorder,
and with big money at stake. Psychiatric drug research is
highly subjective and rife with manipulation.
Speaker 28: There are many, many, many places where you can tweak
the study just a little bit with the study design,
or with the way you gather the data, or the
way the data reported, And there's so many different ways
you could bias a study.
Speaker 4: I've seen what they did to the data in these trials.
Speaker 26: There's no question that they manipulated the data.
Speaker 21: For example, let's say they had one hundred people to
start with, forty percent drop out, thirty percent have a
positive response.
Speaker 4: Thirty percent have no response.
Speaker 21: They then say that they have a fifty percent response rate,
when in fact most of us would say it's a
thirty percent response rate because only thirty out of the
original one hundred really responded, and so you can see
that that's a little bit of a manipulation of the
research data.
Speaker 14: When they design drug studies, they're only looking at the
one thing they want they want to see, and they
don't report all the other things.
Speaker 3: That are happening.
Speaker 6: Case in point, the antidepressant Symbalta.
Speaker 9: Lily I believe, in February of two thousand and four,
did a clinical trial study. The people in this clinical
trial did not have symptoms of depression. And in that
clinical trial there were eleven attempted suicides and four suicides completed,
one of which was Tracy Johnson, nineteen year old college girl.
She did not have any symptoms of depression, and yet
this drug pushed her to commit suicide by hanging yourself.
Speaker 20: That shoots the theory donald that they say that you know,
people get suicidalists because of the underlying illness, that people
kill themselves. That these weren't suicidal people begin with, These
weren't depressed at all. These were healthy people.
Speaker 6: A slew of media coverage followed, but psychiatrists on the
FDA Drug Evaluation Panel chose to ignore the death and
went on to approve sim Balta. The following August.
Speaker 28: One of the reasons why we have underestimated the potential
of some psychiatric antidepressant drugs to actually trigger a suicidal
kind of behavior in people is because the people who
designed the research study didn't include and the research questionnaire
the suicidal behavior. And then you can report that we
had zero incidents of this type of behavior among our subjects.
Speaker 12: And then the response is trumpeted as if there's something
magical about it, when in fact what's happened is a
whole statistical tap dance routine that violates good science. However,
on the basis of that kind of phony trial, the
drug can be marketed.
Speaker 33: Keep in mind that when a drug is tested in
the clinical trials, it's only a very short period of time.
The final phase of testing can be anywhere from five
to six weeks.
Speaker 10: The longest of those studies was eight weeks, the.
Speaker 24: Shortest was weeks.
Speaker 10: So these are not long term studies. I think most
physicians and most people taking the drugs assume they're long
term one year, two years, three year studies.
Speaker 8: They're not.
Speaker 10: They're very very short studies.
Speaker 26: I find it pretty outrageous that we can base a
multi billion dollar industry on a few six or eight
week clinical trials where any depressant medications beat a sugar
pill by a few percentage points.
Speaker 6: It is on the basis of biased research such as
this that psychotropics with potentially fatal side effects are routinely
approved by FDA panels for a lifetime of use. And
how can this happen? Because drugs are big money and
FDA panels are dominated by those who benefit by approving them.
Speaker 10: The FDA panels that evaluate these drugs are largely psychiatrists.
All of a sudden you discover there are twenty different
pharmaceutical companies pay them either grants or honorary or some
other way. They're getting paid by the pharmaceutical industry.
Speaker 22: If you have a psychiatrist who works at the FDA,
he could also be being paid by industry. He might
sit on industry panels or discussions, or get paid to
be a speaker. What I found in working with the
physicians at the FDA was that they they could have
dual positions. They could sit on an industry board, they
could be influenced by industry.
Speaker 14: If you've got ten FDA scientists or ten committee members,
it's just a matter of six saying yes the drug
is safe for saying no, And in almost every single case,
those six saying that the drug is safe and effective
always have pharmaceutical ties. They're getting paid, they're getting funded
somehow or another.
Speaker 20: Have you been diagnosed with depression and struggle with sadness,
trouble sleeping, anxiety, or low energy?
Speaker 4: Ask your doctor about affexor XR.
Speaker 6: With phase three approval of foregone conclusion, the marketing blitz begins.
But while psychiatrists have already begun promoting and prescribing these
drugs throughout the world, there's one more phase yet to
be carried out, Phase four.
Speaker 11: What phase four clinical trials are is when they've actually
gotten the drug approved, and then they get it into
the general population so that we finally find out what
it does when it hits ethnic populations, women, children.
Speaker 12: Then we see who dies, who has seizures, who has
deformed children, who has epilepsy, who has diseases downstream, whose
heart stops.
Speaker 29: The public is the clinical trial that's where we find
out the problems with these drugs.
Speaker 16: This is an experimental stage, and it's so much so
that one consumer protection group has advised patients that they
refuse a prescription for any drug that hasn't already been
on the market for seven years.
Speaker 10: So if you're taking a drug that's only been out
for a year or two or three, you are a
guinea pig.
Speaker 6: And the experimentation doesn't end here. Additional psychiatric drug trials
take advantage of the invented disorders in psychiatry's diagnostic and
Statistical manual to rake in even more profits by targeting
the most innocent of all.
Speaker 26: If they test their drugs on children, then they get
a six month extension on their exclusivity period or patent period.
Speaker 6: This psychiatric drug research center in Texas uses advertisements to
lure in child volunteers, and once inside, they're further enticed
with the simplest of tricks.
Speaker 5: We have game boys, we have spox, the five two US.
Speaker 33: They come in here and they help themselves to crackers,
cookies for candy freeing crackers.
Speaker 5: To pay for you don't pay for any more.
Speaker 6: But these perks are just bait to coax children into
ingesting powerful psychiatric drugs known to cause suicide and violence
in their own age group.
Speaker 11: These are drugs that would cost maybe several hundred dollars
a month in a pharmacy.
Speaker 25: They actually are getting them free in research.
Speaker 17: We loved children, and we just love children because they're
they our future.
Speaker 26: By conducting those tests on children, they get a financial
incentive's worth over a billion dollars. Those are the fact
you make out one what.
Speaker 6: You will with this kind of money at stake. Psychotropic
drug experimentation on children is ramnant, with three hundred and
twenty three studies either completed or in the works, including
a two thousand and three trial that tested children on
an antidepressant treating pre menstrual dysphoric disorder.
Speaker 8: Those drugs, which are barely more effective than paceibos, often
have huge side effects which are dangerous and even deadly
to people.
Speaker 6: Families don't know the risk.
Speaker 24: If they actually were aware of the risk and believed
that they wouldn't know, one would take their risk.
Speaker 4: The psychiatrist would.
Speaker 22: She didn't say one word to me about what was
going to be the effects of the drugs.
Speaker 3: No side effects listed.
Speaker 16: No, Well, let's sit down to talk about this.
Speaker 2: At that point in time, he said, well, this doesn't
have that type of reaction on any children.
Speaker 3: You know that it's very safe. If he had told me,
then what I know now about it.
Speaker 6: I never would have taken it.
Speaker 34: She said, death must have been unpaxeled. That's the only
way she would kill herself. And I said, well, what
is this? How do people know this? I didn't know
anybody would know something like that. And we went on
the internet and all of a sudden you find out
this it's not uncommon. But that's not uncommon for people
to become psychotic on these drugs.
Speaker 26: We're entitled to know the truth before we give a
mind halted drug to our children and our wives, our mother,
our father, ourselves.
Speaker 22: We don't really know what they're doing. That's what scares me.
It's all made up theory. There are no facts about
what these drugs really do. And if someone said, well,
we don't know what this is going to do to you,
good or bad, would you take that medication?
Speaker 9: Now, that is not the practice of medicine. That's the
practice of marketing. And this practice of marketing is taking
lives and the poor patient doesn't even know it.
Speaker 6: But in the testing and marketing of psychotropic drugs, money
trump safety. The top ten most prescribed psychotropic drugs grows
over twenty six and a half billion dollars annually more
than double the amount of new money put into circulation
every year by the United States meant. But to make
this kind of money, psychiatrists first have to convince the
most crucial markets sce of all those with the power
of prescription.
Speaker 28: The psychiatryt specifically, there's just kind of working as sales
agents for the pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 25: There's nothing like another doctor touting the benefits of your
drug to drive market share.
Speaker 22: They're an extended part of the marketing arm of these companies.
Speaker 19: Medications play a primary role we give drugs.
Speaker 12: Medication is a muss.
Speaker 35: There's a lot of new medications are.
Speaker 27: Medication is available.
Speaker 36: For medications to use.
Speaker 7: Antipsychotic medication.
Speaker 37: The typical antipsychotics spendidize it beings stimulants.
Speaker 21: As you depressed medications in AOI amphetamines.
Speaker 35: Acting revolves the medications.
Speaker 37: Once the medications have been balanced out and move.
Speaker 3: On to a combination of three metas.
Speaker 20: There's no absolute limit that is set for the number
of medications.
Speaker 37: There are so many choices, but apparently we're willing to
try almost any.
Speaker 6: Psychic Psychiatric drugs can't be sold without a prescription, so
pharmaceutical companies hire psychiatrists to promote psychiatric drugs to their
fellow prescribers. The money trail starts at the world's most
prestigious medical schools in the offices of highly influential university
based or academic psychiatrists. With their seal of approval. Pharmaceutical
companies make billions on psychotropic drugs.
Speaker 10: There are a lot of academic psychiatrists especially who have
ties to ten or fifteen or twenty different pharmaceutical companies,
and so they're making a very large amount of money.
Speaker 20: Whether the professors or whether they're work at big medical institutions,
those drug companies will make sure that they've got them
on the payroll somehow.
Speaker 2: They'll have this person feed this information to their other peers.
But it's all being motivated through moneis being funded by
pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 10: About forty percent of the early stage marketing dollars for
pharmaceutical companies go straight to these thought leaders psychiatrists.
Speaker 6: These financial arrangements with so cold key opinion leaders are
very lucrative. A top academic psychiatrist can personally rake in
over a half a million dollars per year from pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 28: These people are still considered the stars of their medical
centers because they bring in all this great money from
the pharmaceutical companies, and that helps keep the coffers of
the medical centerfold.
Speaker 30: Universities receive a lot of money from the pharmaceutical industry.
Drug companies are building buildings right next to the medical school.
They're funding research right and left.
Speaker 15: The University of Michigan Depression Center received I think it
was seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars from Eli Lilly.
And all they do down there is crank out this
file logical view of psychiatry and mental illness and depressions.
Speaker 6: With academic psychiatrists collecting millions in drug money for their universities,
it is no surprise that school curricula focus on psychotropic drugs.
Speaker 1: Training programs in psychiatry. The majority of now are drugs first.
You know you're really a psycho pharmacologist in a way
when you come out of a psych residency training program.
Speaker 35: But even when I went to medical school, psychiatri did
talk to patients. Now, all they do is write a
prescription to send them away.
Speaker 8: A psychiatrist is trained for one purpose to administer psychiatric drugs.
Speaker 6: Academic psychiatrists don't just indoctrinate future prescribers, They also heavily
promote these drugs to their peers first by creating clinical
trial studies passed off as unbiased research that push both
an invented psychiatric disorder and the drug to manage it.
These studies are planted in professional journals to be read
by their colleagues and quoted.
Speaker 3: In the media.
Speaker 6: But what readers don't know is that an estimated fifty
percent of the time these psychiatrists never took part in
the studies.
Speaker 28: One of the most unethical practices we're aware of is
ghostwriting of journal articles, where somebody at the pharmaceutical company
will write the paper and the academic physician will put
his name on it and get it published in a
major journal, when he may be changed three or four
words in the whole article, and the article was basically
written as a marketing tool by the drug company, and
yet this academic puts his name on it as if
he's the author.
Speaker 38: He has had no part in the study, and also
he probably hasn't even read the results, but he is
prepared to receive ten twenty thousand dollars to put his
name at the front of the research, which gives it
added authority.
Speaker 6: Ghostwriting is so common that even the psychiatrist running the
FDA department evaluating Psychiatric drug safety has attached his name
to ghost written articles.
Speaker 10: The average physician picks that up and reads it. He
believes it, and it's not a mystery that he would
believe it. It seems reasonable that it's been black and white.
It is in a good journals, in the New England
Journal of Medicine.
Speaker 3: It must be true.
Speaker 6: These journals are often sent free to psychiatrists and doctors
under the guise of legitimate medical research. And why are
they free because pharmaceutical drug ads re huge revenues for
their publishers.
Speaker 21: So if you go through medical journal you'll see page
after page of advertising for bipolar disorder and treatment of
using medications, or advertisings for depression and treatment of using
medications schizophrenia.
Speaker 17: So it's really everywhere.
Speaker 37: I remember, just a couple of years ago the first
time I opened the journal from the American Psychological Association
called the APA Monitor, and there was at the page
ad high gloss very expensive for concerto, which is time
release riddling. I resigned from the American Psychological Association I
was going to be part of this whatsoever.
Speaker 29: It's very hard when your major source of income is
advertising and advertising placement to write an article that's negative
about a particular drug and expect that company to continue
to buy ads in your medical journals. So that's a
major issue.
Speaker 6: But psychiatric key opinion leaders aren't satisfied with filling medical
journals with ghost written articles. They also spread the gospel
of psychotropic drugs at conferences. In continuing medical education or CME.
Speaker 25: Physicians and nurse practitioners and physicians and assistants are mandated
to take a certain amount of continuing education credits every year.
Well seventy percent of all continuing medical education is now
funded by the pharmaceutical industry.
Speaker 27: Best seminar is going to be taught by a professional
who is employed by the pharmaceutical company. The very nature
of where someone is giving you your support means you're
biased to that person's side.
Speaker 10: Many physicians and many psychiatrists who at ten medical conferences
don't know that when they go to that conference meeting
that's about antidepressants antipsychotics, and it's generally an academic psychiatrist
who's speaking, they don't realize that person's probably making about
ten thousand dollars for that one hour speech.
Speaker 6: But you don't have to be an academic psychiatrist to
get a piece of the pie. Psychiatrists who heavily prescribe
psychotropic drugs are generously rewarded by pharmaceutical sales representatives for
drumming up local business.
Speaker 1: Psychiatrists, especially high prescribers, are targeted and gifted extensively by
the industry. Now that gifting is where you need to
get specific.
Speaker 2: That was not unusual during our marketing conversations to say, well,
what's our top drug writer. You know, who's the doctor
that's prescribing the most of this drug? Well, you know,
let's send them to the Kentucky Derby.
Speaker 22: We offered trips on some occasions to come out and
hear a two hour talk, but it happened to be
on a nice island in Hawaii.
Speaker 25: There were a lot of things that we did day
in and day out to try to get the doctors.
Speaker 20: To write our drugs, or in my.
Speaker 25: Case, to write for the psychiatric drugs. We did a
lot of lunches and dinners, and we brought in speakers
and those speakers. Speakers were obviously paid by us, and
we would waive you know, renowned studies at them from
renowned journals. But of course we would never say that
these these studies were paid for by our company, and
that the that the it was written by a ghost
writer who was paid by our company, or that our
company tends to do a ton of advertising within that
particular medicature. We would never say that.
Speaker 6: We have over three hundred million psychiatric drug prescriptions written
every year. High prescribing psychiatrists are richly rewarded for opening
up new markets. They receive up to twenty five percent
more pharmaceutical money than any other medical specialty, an average
in one state of more than forty five thousand dollars
per top psychiatrist per year.
Speaker 35: Psychiatrists get more kickback from the pharmaceutical companies than any
other branch of medicine.
Speaker 39: The profession of psychiatry couldn't keep its journals afloat, couldn't
keep its conferences afloat, couldn't keep its organizations afloat without
money from drug companies. The drug companies really have psychiatry
in their pocket.
Speaker 31: This is a profession whose diagnoses have been heavily influenced
by people who are heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry
and whose treatments are almost exclusively these days pharmaceuticals.
Speaker 4: We should be.
Speaker 3: Able to count on them.
Speaker 4: I do not believe that we.
Speaker 6: Due to the ceaseless promotion by psychiatrists, psychotropic drug prescription
has permeated not just psychiatrists but the entire medical profession.
But this promotional campaign has a second prom that lines
the pockets of psychiatrists more than any other, and this
one directly targets you.
Speaker 3: I know it's pay struggle. I know you've had Spain.
I know you feel the tie hell down all the way. Yeah,
I know you feel you smile ain't the same as well,
go for a you feel like you've lost your way, Dude,
don't give it. No, don't give it and never is home.
Don't let call the primise. It ain't done yet. He's
got a glad. Why it's a way got up? Let
me come.
Speaker 36: Why it's right? God, m.
Speaker 3: I can see the street beside you. Child's are putting
up five.
Speaker 40: Oh, you're stronger than thing you are. Yeah, you're gonna
be all right. You're accepting a dead found beautiful you're
shoving ride.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're living, breathing, move you can't hold your head.
Speaker 17: A hide, don't give up, no, don't give in, never
loss home, don't let go on the primies.
Speaker 41: It ain't doneiets, God a clay, Why some waintail, the
God of Mabe comes, don't give up, No, don't give.
Speaker 3: In, never lives home, don't let go on the primies.
It ain't gonfe It's worth living.
Speaker 36: W a way town. The god of baby colt. Why
surprase now?
Speaker 3: Got up?
Speaker 36: Stay?
Speaker 3: Oh? Yes? What sur pray now? The God of baby come?
Speaker 36: Oh yeah, gotta gave me cart.
Speaker 3: Don't give up, No, don't give in, never lose hold.
Don't they go of the primis? I mean I done? Yes, God,
I plan? Wats die? Kind of even coat and don't
give up? No dog giving any but never hold. Don't
let go of the crimes. Get ain't done? Lovers what
they lived once and died? The God of every.
Speaker 13: Cos oh, the God of need cos w's done?
Speaker 3: The God of co.
Speaker 36: Mm hmmm.
Speaker 6: You're listening to the Fact Hunter Radio Network.
Speaker 4: Just the facts, Mammy,