WEBVTT

1
00:00:07.320 --> 00:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>The trip Cast is brought to you by members of

2
00:00:09.160 --> 00:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Tribune. Hello and welcome to the Texas Tribune

3
00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:24.519
<v Speaker 1>trip Cast for December second, twenty twenty five. I am

4
00:00:24.519 --> 00:00:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Watkins, editor in chief of the Texts Tribune, joined

5
00:00:27.879 --> 00:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as usual by Eleanor Klibanoff Law and Politics reporter.

6
00:00:32.759 --> 00:00:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Hello, thank you for having me.

7
00:00:34.920 --> 00:00:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I got a little bit. I'm sure that I got

8
00:00:37.479 --> 00:00:41.079
<v Speaker 1>through yah. We are joined this week by K through

9
00:00:41.119 --> 00:00:42.799
<v Speaker 1>twelve reporter Jaden Edison.

10
00:00:42.880 --> 00:00:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Jaden Greens. Hello, how are y'all?

11
00:00:44.920 --> 00:00:47.719
<v Speaker 2>We were discussing in the newsroom. How great this sweatshirt looks.

12
00:00:47.520 --> 00:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>On It is a sweater trip cast.

13
00:00:51.719 --> 00:00:52.880
<v Speaker 3>You're not watching on YouTube?

14
00:00:52.920 --> 00:00:54.079
<v Speaker 4>This is one to watch on you.

15
00:00:54.759 --> 00:00:55.479
<v Speaker 3>We look so cozy.

16
00:00:55.479 --> 00:00:57.359
<v Speaker 5>Anybody in Texas just waiting on his weather so we

17
00:00:57.399 --> 00:00:58.520
<v Speaker 5>can put out our winter fits?

18
00:00:59.280 --> 00:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

19
00:01:00.439 --> 00:01:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Also joining us and also in a sweater, is David Fagan,

20
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>director of Early Learning policy with Texans Care for Children.

21
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Hello, David, Hey, good to see y'all, and I was

22
00:01:11.319 --> 00:01:13.480
<v Speaker 4>delighted to see you all also in sweaters. I didn't

23
00:01:13.480 --> 00:01:14.799
<v Speaker 4>know how I was gonna dress for this, but I

24
00:01:14.840 --> 00:01:16.920
<v Speaker 4>feel good, I feel welcome, and I feel cozy, So

25
00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:17.640
<v Speaker 4>I need to.

26
00:01:17.560 --> 00:01:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Talk David, the first Trip Cast guest to have played

27
00:01:22.760 --> 00:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>basketball with me.

28
00:01:23.920 --> 00:01:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow wow. On five and five.

29
00:01:28.239 --> 00:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It was an old game back in the day again,

30
00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:33.239
<v Speaker 1>started by former Texas reporter now for the New York Times,

31
00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Brian Rosenthal. We would play a weekly Saturday game Sunday game.

32
00:01:38.040 --> 00:01:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Games still going on, although David David left us quit.

33
00:01:43.040 --> 00:01:46.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, you know, the invite stopped coming. I think

34
00:01:46.840 --> 00:01:48.319
<v Speaker 4>maybe I played too well or something.

35
00:01:48.799 --> 00:01:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the standard is too high.

36
00:01:51.560 --> 00:01:52.359
<v Speaker 3>I love it, I get it.

37
00:01:52.799 --> 00:01:53.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to embarrass anybody.

38
00:01:54.120 --> 00:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, we'll move on.

39
00:01:56.599 --> 00:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe someday we'll have robbed down in on

40
00:01:59.359 --> 00:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the show and we talk about my vicious block of

41
00:02:02.280 --> 00:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>him and the one toy he played in that game too.

42
00:02:04.480 --> 00:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>He still talks about it.

43
00:02:05.599 --> 00:02:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's why he left the Texas Tribune.

44
00:02:08.599 --> 00:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>It is, yes, because I kept bringing it up.

45
00:02:10.840 --> 00:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, but that's not what we're talking about today,

46
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:16.479
<v Speaker 1>although maybe we can talk.

47
00:02:16.319 --> 00:02:17.280
<v Speaker 3>A little bit more about it.

48
00:02:18.120 --> 00:02:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Of the conversation tapes and said we were going to

49
00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about early childhood care early learning, a topic near

50
00:02:24.960 --> 00:02:28.599
<v Speaker 1>and dear to the hearts of many working parents such

51
00:02:28.639 --> 00:02:31.039
<v Speaker 1>as myself and David as we were talking about earlier

52
00:02:31.039 --> 00:02:34.759
<v Speaker 1>before we started on. If you are a parent in

53
00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Texas where both parents work, you know about the challenges

54
00:02:40.039 --> 00:02:44.199
<v Speaker 1>of finding adequate care for your children. I remember when

55
00:02:44.400 --> 00:02:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I was in Dallas when we had our first kid.

56
00:02:47.560 --> 00:02:49.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the first things you are told

57
00:02:49.479 --> 00:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is a soon to be parent, is you better get

58
00:02:52.560 --> 00:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on a childcare wait list as soon as possible. Many

59
00:02:56.360 --> 00:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of the places in Dallas at the time the wait

60
00:02:58.319 --> 00:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>list was more than nine months, So you actually needed

61
00:03:01.080 --> 00:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to get onto the wait list when you were thinking

62
00:03:04.240 --> 00:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>about having a kid, not even when you found out

63
00:03:06.319 --> 00:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you were going to have a kid. The problem even

64
00:03:09.719 --> 00:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>worse in rural areas or for low income Texans. I

65
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:17.719
<v Speaker 1>am going to cite a stat that is from David

66
00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that says that eighty eight percent of working families with

67
00:03:20.919 --> 00:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>low incomes live in childcare deserts, where demand is three

68
00:03:24.439 --> 00:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>times greater than the availability of high quality childcare seats.

69
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Two notable things happened this legislative session in this regard,

70
00:03:34.039 --> 00:03:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the first one being the legislature approved one hundred million

71
00:03:36.800 --> 00:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars toward childcare scholarships in an effort to shrink the

72
00:03:39.840 --> 00:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>nearly ninety five thousand member waiting list for those scholarships.

73
00:03:44.439 --> 00:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>The money was spent, the waiting list did not shrink,

74
00:03:48.159 --> 00:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks in large part to increased childcare costs. We'll get

75
00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>into that here in a little bit. Second, the state

76
00:03:54.080 --> 00:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>voted a little bit more not under the radar politically,

77
00:03:57.400 --> 00:03:59.919
<v Speaker 1>but under the radar toward this issue to approve a

78
00:04:00.120 --> 00:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollar school voucher program. It was designed and

79
00:04:03.879 --> 00:04:06.639
<v Speaker 1>touted as a way to use state dollars to help

80
00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>kids pay for their private school tuition. But what was

81
00:04:09.719 --> 00:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not discussed as much was that the vouchers can also

82
00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:17.439
<v Speaker 1>be used for private pre k something that the comptroller

83
00:04:17.519 --> 00:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>confirmed last week, so that could be a major change.

84
00:04:21.160 --> 00:04:23.639
<v Speaker 1>But I want to start first with you, David, on

85
00:04:23.680 --> 00:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this scholarship issue. Lay out for me, first of all,

86
00:04:27.759 --> 00:04:31.759
<v Speaker 1>just what this program was and how it works. Just

87
00:04:32.160 --> 00:04:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you know how it has worked over the years.

88
00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:38.680
<v Speaker 4>So the Childcare Services program is managed by the Texas

89
00:04:38.720 --> 00:04:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Workforce Commission, and it does so because it helps parents

90
00:04:43.759 --> 00:04:46.920
<v Speaker 4>go to work. And the Workforce Commission is proud to

91
00:04:46.920 --> 00:04:49.920
<v Speaker 4>have this as the largest line item of its budget

92
00:04:49.959 --> 00:04:53.720
<v Speaker 4>is supporting this program. It provides financial aid, also known

93
00:04:53.720 --> 00:04:58.120
<v Speaker 4>as scholarships or subsidies to eligible families who meet work

94
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:01.079
<v Speaker 4>and income requirements have a child under the age of thirteen.

95
00:05:01.399 --> 00:05:03.160
<v Speaker 4>It gives them financial assistance so that they can go

96
00:05:03.199 --> 00:05:05.319
<v Speaker 4>to work and their children can thrive in really high

97
00:05:05.399 --> 00:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>quality childcare programs. There's about thirty thousand Texas employers right

98
00:05:09.839 --> 00:05:12.639
<v Speaker 4>now who have somebody working there who's there because they

99
00:05:12.639 --> 00:05:14.879
<v Speaker 4>have access to one of these scholarships. So we know

100
00:05:14.959 --> 00:05:18.600
<v Speaker 4>this is a really important program for the Texas economy

101
00:05:18.600 --> 00:05:22.360
<v Speaker 4>and for Texas families. The funding has primarily come from

102
00:05:22.360 --> 00:05:25.800
<v Speaker 4>the federal government the Childcare and Development Block Grant the

103
00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Congress provides, but states around the country have infused additional

104
00:05:29.600 --> 00:05:32.639
<v Speaker 4>dollars to serve more families. Prior to last session, Texas

105
00:05:32.680 --> 00:05:35.920
<v Speaker 4>was not one of those states. Texas took the federal money,

106
00:05:35.959 --> 00:05:38.959
<v Speaker 4>spent it, but did not add in any state dollars

107
00:05:39.240 --> 00:05:42.199
<v Speaker 4>to serve more parents. We were excited that last session

108
00:05:42.639 --> 00:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>that changed, and as you said, one hundred million new

109
00:05:46.079 --> 00:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>dollars got invested into this program to serve more families,

110
00:05:50.040 --> 00:05:54.800
<v Speaker 4>and we're excited that win happened, that it was bipartisan,

111
00:05:55.839 --> 00:05:57.480
<v Speaker 4>But as we'll talk about, there's a lot more work

112
00:05:57.519 --> 00:05:59.959
<v Speaker 4>to do to actually serve more families and bring down

113
00:06:00.120 --> 00:06:02.879
<v Speaker 4>the very long wait list for that program, which sits

114
00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:04.439
<v Speaker 4>at around one hundred thousand kids.

115
00:06:04.560 --> 00:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, can you talk a little bit about just the

116
00:06:06.879 --> 00:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>discussion about this during the legislative session. I mean, I

117
00:06:10.519 --> 00:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>gave sort of my own personal experience at the top

118
00:06:12.839 --> 00:06:16.319
<v Speaker 1>of the show. But you know, was it a reflection

119
00:06:16.600 --> 00:06:20.519
<v Speaker 1>of the childcare problems in Texas that led to this

120
00:06:20.759 --> 00:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>larger infusion of cash and how was that problem discussed

121
00:06:24.879 --> 00:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>among lawmakers and people who came to the capital to

122
00:06:27.199 --> 00:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>advocate for this.

123
00:06:29.319 --> 00:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, I have been working on this issue

124
00:06:32.240 --> 00:06:36.920
<v Speaker 4>in Earnest really since two thousand and seventeen or so,

125
00:06:37.480 --> 00:06:40.279
<v Speaker 4>and I've sort of watched the journey of this in

126
00:06:40.279 --> 00:06:44.480
<v Speaker 4>the Texas legislature where back then the conversation around childcare

127
00:06:44.519 --> 00:06:47.920
<v Speaker 4>was almost exclusively on ensuring minimum health and safety standards

128
00:06:47.920 --> 00:06:51.319
<v Speaker 4>were met by childcare programs. It was you guys might

129
00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:54.160
<v Speaker 4>recall a big expose that was done by the Austin

130
00:06:54.160 --> 00:06:57.720
<v Speaker 4>American statesmen around you know, children who had died in

131
00:06:57.800 --> 00:07:01.800
<v Speaker 4>childcare programs, and that led to a series of reforms

132
00:07:01.839 --> 00:07:05.319
<v Speaker 4>to try to crack down on unlicensed care. You know,

133
00:07:05.439 --> 00:07:07.959
<v Speaker 4>there was some efforts to improve the nutrition standards in

134
00:07:08.040 --> 00:07:11.240
<v Speaker 4>childcare but over the last few years there's really been

135
00:07:11.279 --> 00:07:14.199
<v Speaker 4>a shift where lawmakers have understood, you know, we have

136
00:07:14.279 --> 00:07:17.399
<v Speaker 4>a role too and actually ensuring families can afford high

137
00:07:17.480 --> 00:07:20.199
<v Speaker 4>quality childcare, that the childcare that they can afford is

138
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:24.000
<v Speaker 4>not just safe, but supporting children's school readiness. And so

139
00:07:24.120 --> 00:07:26.439
<v Speaker 4>going into session for really the first time, it was

140
00:07:26.519 --> 00:07:29.839
<v Speaker 4>very clear that childcare was on the agenda. Both the

141
00:07:29.879 --> 00:07:34.199
<v Speaker 4>House and Senate held interim hearings trying to tackle ways

142
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:37.360
<v Speaker 4>in which we can address this during the session. In

143
00:07:37.399 --> 00:07:39.959
<v Speaker 4>my time, the Senate had never had a hearing on

144
00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:42.800
<v Speaker 4>this topic during the interim, and so we knew that

145
00:07:42.839 --> 00:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>it was going to be a big priority. We didn't

146
00:07:46.040 --> 00:07:49.920
<v Speaker 4>know how that would manifest, and you know, we worked

147
00:07:49.920 --> 00:07:53.120
<v Speaker 4>with partners to really bring up this issue of the

148
00:07:53.160 --> 00:07:56.959
<v Speaker 4>wait list, that there's children who are eligible for this

149
00:07:57.000 --> 00:07:59.920
<v Speaker 4>program but are waiting for six months to two years

150
00:08:00.040 --> 00:08:02.920
<v Speaker 4>because they're the lack of funds. This is not a

151
00:08:02.920 --> 00:08:05.360
<v Speaker 4>program where every child who's eligible gets served. There's a

152
00:08:05.360 --> 00:08:07.639
<v Speaker 4>certain number of scholarships we fund, and after that you

153
00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:09.560
<v Speaker 4>have to wait for somebody to come off the program.

154
00:08:09.839 --> 00:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>And so there are families waiting because we don't have

155
00:08:12.079 --> 00:08:15.120
<v Speaker 4>enough funds. You know, we told the stories not just

156
00:08:15.160 --> 00:08:17.360
<v Speaker 4>of families who were struggling, but the families who actually

157
00:08:17.360 --> 00:08:20.319
<v Speaker 4>benefited from this program. You know, we talked to a

158
00:08:20.360 --> 00:08:24.959
<v Speaker 4>mom who was literally homeless before she got access to

159
00:08:24.959 --> 00:08:27.120
<v Speaker 4>one of these scholarships. She was able to work a

160
00:08:27.160 --> 00:08:30.519
<v Speaker 4>couple hours a week cleaning houses with her baby strapped

161
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:34.960
<v Speaker 4>to her because she had no childcare. She eventually got

162
00:08:34.960 --> 00:08:38.600
<v Speaker 4>a scholarship. Now she's working full time, she's housed, and

163
00:08:38.679 --> 00:08:40.600
<v Speaker 4>her child is in a really high quality program here

164
00:08:40.600 --> 00:08:44.159
<v Speaker 4>in Austin. And we were able to tell stories like

165
00:08:44.200 --> 00:08:47.600
<v Speaker 4>that and say, look at all of this program is achieving.

166
00:08:48.919 --> 00:08:51.679
<v Speaker 4>Don't we want to see more Texas families benefit in

167
00:08:51.720 --> 00:08:54.240
<v Speaker 4>the ways that these parents have. And so, you know,

168
00:08:54.320 --> 00:08:57.480
<v Speaker 4>we also told the stories of frankly, lots of Republican

169
00:08:57.559 --> 00:09:00.960
<v Speaker 4>led states around the country who to Texas and was

170
00:09:01.000 --> 00:09:04.360
<v Speaker 4>really investing. And so between that, I think we were

171
00:09:04.399 --> 00:09:07.080
<v Speaker 4>able to make a winning case that investing in this

172
00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:10.519
<v Speaker 4>program is research based, it's popular, it's it's something we

173
00:09:10.559 --> 00:09:14.480
<v Speaker 4>can do very simply in serving more parents. And so

174
00:09:15.200 --> 00:09:18.000
<v Speaker 4>we were able to get that win. And I will

175
00:09:18.039 --> 00:09:21.960
<v Speaker 4>say that the leadership of Representative Armando Wally was really key,

176
00:09:22.240 --> 00:09:24.879
<v Speaker 4>as well as the speaker of the House and you know,

177
00:09:25.440 --> 00:09:29.320
<v Speaker 4>the Appropriations Center finance chair chair women, chairwoman, and chairman.

178
00:09:29.759 --> 00:09:33.200
<v Speaker 4>So it was a big bipartisan win for sure.

179
00:09:33.480 --> 00:09:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Two things I sort of want to get your your

180
00:09:34.879 --> 00:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>read on is like what shifted this conversation and move

181
00:09:37.960 --> 00:09:43.039
<v Speaker 2>childcare into the more like mainstream political conversation here. Yeah,

182
00:09:43.159 --> 00:09:45.240
<v Speaker 2>one being you know, the thing I covered for a

183
00:09:45.240 --> 00:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>long time, which was the you know, ban on abortion

184
00:09:47.840 --> 00:09:50.799
<v Speaker 2>and sort of this attention that Republican lawmakers sort of

185
00:09:50.840 --> 00:09:55.080
<v Speaker 2>felt called to address, you know, women's health issues, supporting families,

186
00:09:55.120 --> 00:09:57.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of making good on some of these promises that

187
00:09:57.240 --> 00:10:01.720
<v Speaker 2>they brought to bear, which sort of I've searched seen

188
00:10:01.720 --> 00:10:03.279
<v Speaker 2>that play out of the last couple of years. The

189
00:10:03.320 --> 00:10:05.360
<v Speaker 2>other one being, though that I'm not as clear on,

190
00:10:05.480 --> 00:10:07.559
<v Speaker 2>is like the COVID pandemic and the way that that

191
00:10:07.679 --> 00:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of felt like suddenly we were all talking about

192
00:10:09.399 --> 00:10:11.159
<v Speaker 2>childcare in a way we hadn't been before.

193
00:10:13.039 --> 00:10:15.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're totally right. I mean it's not just in Texas.

194
00:10:15.639 --> 00:10:18.759
<v Speaker 4>There was you know, we wrote a policy brief around

195
00:10:18.840 --> 00:10:22.240
<v Speaker 4>as I mentioned, how different Republican led states have addressed

196
00:10:22.240 --> 00:10:24.200
<v Speaker 4>this issue, and what you'll find is a lot of

197
00:10:24.240 --> 00:10:28.159
<v Speaker 4>their big investments came right on the heels of you know,

198
00:10:28.240 --> 00:10:31.480
<v Speaker 4>right after the pandemics sort of began in twenty one

199
00:10:31.639 --> 00:10:35.159
<v Speaker 4>or in twenty twenty three, and so there has been

200
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:37.200
<v Speaker 4>an explosion of attention on this. I think there's a

201
00:10:37.200 --> 00:10:42.679
<v Speaker 4>few reasons. One is the need for childcare became quite

202
00:10:42.759 --> 00:10:45.759
<v Speaker 4>clear to people, many of whom were home with their

203
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:48.919
<v Speaker 4>kids all day. If their childcare program had to close,

204
00:10:49.080 --> 00:10:52.200
<v Speaker 4>or you know, they had to take time off work

205
00:10:52.240 --> 00:10:53.879
<v Speaker 4>to be with their kids at home, I think the

206
00:10:53.960 --> 00:10:56.840
<v Speaker 4>need for childcare became very visible. The other thing that

207
00:10:56.840 --> 00:10:59.559
<v Speaker 4>I think was really important was the federal government, under

208
00:10:59.559 --> 00:11:03.879
<v Speaker 4>both the Trump administration and the Biden administrations, invested significant

209
00:11:04.440 --> 00:11:09.320
<v Speaker 4>federal dollars into states to stabilize childcare. And what we

210
00:11:09.480 --> 00:11:13.039
<v Speaker 4>found was that worked. It turned out that spending a

211
00:11:13.080 --> 00:11:16.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of money to ensure that programs can retain staff,

212
00:11:17.080 --> 00:11:19.679
<v Speaker 4>that they can receive funding so they don't have to

213
00:11:19.759 --> 00:11:23.200
<v Speaker 4>rt increase costs on parents, that that's a very popular

214
00:11:23.320 --> 00:11:26.159
<v Speaker 4>and effective way to help families go to work. So

215
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:29.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of states saw once those federal dollars ran out,

216
00:11:29.480 --> 00:11:32.320
<v Speaker 4>said what can we do to fill the gaps? And

217
00:11:32.600 --> 00:11:35.799
<v Speaker 4>I think that it essentially served as an unintentional pilot

218
00:11:35.840 --> 00:11:39.480
<v Speaker 4>program where states got to see, hey, if we invest

219
00:11:39.879 --> 00:11:42.440
<v Speaker 4>money into these programs, we can get really good returns.

220
00:11:42.799 --> 00:11:46.879
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's essentially opened the valve of investments

221
00:11:47.159 --> 00:11:49.200
<v Speaker 4>that we're now seeing across the country.

222
00:11:50.440 --> 00:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's I think also worth at least making the

223
00:11:54.519 --> 00:11:56.879
<v Speaker 1>point that there has been a political shift, there's been

224
00:11:56.919 --> 00:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a willingness to invest more money on this. You know,

225
00:12:01.039 --> 00:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it was one hundred million dollars, which is a big investment.

226
00:12:04.399 --> 00:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, the state did spend fifty one billion dollars

227
00:12:07.480 --> 00:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>on reducing property taxes this year, so there's there's something

228
00:12:10.480 --> 00:12:13.279
<v Speaker 1>about the priorities there. But it's also worth pointing out

229
00:12:13.360 --> 00:12:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that as your report on this, David noted that this

230
00:12:17.519 --> 00:12:21.039
<v Speaker 1>money was you know, not actually state money that was

231
00:12:21.200 --> 00:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>being added to this. It was unspent federal dollars from

232
00:12:23.879 --> 00:12:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. That basically there

233
00:12:27.919 --> 00:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>was this pot of money that Texas had that had

234
00:12:30.519 --> 00:12:33.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of decided not to spend, not to find a

235
00:12:33.919 --> 00:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>use for, and then they kind of decided, oh, maybe

236
00:12:36.200 --> 00:12:40.159
<v Speaker 1>we should use it to boost this scholarship program.

237
00:12:40.279 --> 00:12:43.879
<v Speaker 4>That's right. Yeah, it took quite a journey. The House

238
00:12:44.559 --> 00:12:47.720
<v Speaker 4>passed in its budget one hundred million of state dollars

239
00:12:48.840 --> 00:12:52.440
<v Speaker 4>that it evolved into, as you say, these unexpended tan

240
00:12:52.519 --> 00:12:57.720
<v Speaker 4>OF funds. Our opinion on this, frankly is that the

241
00:12:57.799 --> 00:13:00.840
<v Speaker 4>parents who will benefit won't really know the difference that

242
00:13:00.879 --> 00:13:03.360
<v Speaker 4>it came from an unspent tantiff pot or an unspent

243
00:13:03.399 --> 00:13:07.200
<v Speaker 4>general revenue pot. I think that the point is lawmakers

244
00:13:07.279 --> 00:13:10.399
<v Speaker 4>found a way to make this investment, and we know that,

245
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:13.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, states across the country are using TANAF dollars

246
00:13:13.879 --> 00:13:17.080
<v Speaker 4>for this purpose, so it's not a stretch to say

247
00:13:17.120 --> 00:13:20.039
<v Speaker 4>that this is a really valid use of those dollars

248
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:23.360
<v Speaker 4>when we have them. I think that moving forward, we

249
00:13:23.360 --> 00:13:25.320
<v Speaker 4>should look at that uninspent tant IF pot as a

250
00:13:25.320 --> 00:13:27.759
<v Speaker 4>way to fund this program, but also state general revenue

251
00:13:27.840 --> 00:13:32.919
<v Speaker 4>and continue to explore other revenue streams because this problem

252
00:13:33.000 --> 00:13:36.720
<v Speaker 4>is significant. This is not something that is a one

253
00:13:36.799 --> 00:13:40.440
<v Speaker 4>session fix or a even one funding stream strategy. We

254
00:13:40.519 --> 00:13:42.960
<v Speaker 4>have to figure out how to make investments at the

255
00:13:42.960 --> 00:13:46.720
<v Speaker 4>state level, the local level. Philanthropy is going to continue

256
00:13:46.759 --> 00:13:48.080
<v Speaker 4>to play a role. It's going to take a lot

257
00:13:48.080 --> 00:13:50.360
<v Speaker 4>of resources to really get this problem addressed.

258
00:13:50.559 --> 00:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're sort of addressing what was going to be

259
00:13:52.200 --> 00:13:55.919
<v Speaker 1>my next question. Which is how much of the need

260
00:13:56.000 --> 00:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is this filling, how how much of this is moving

261
00:13:59.840 --> 00:14:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the needle in terms of the childcare challenges in the state.

262
00:14:03.200 --> 00:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you talk about a wait list

263
00:14:06.039 --> 00:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of ninety five thousand kids, I would imagine there's a lot,

264
00:14:09.399 --> 00:14:11.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot, a lot more families that you know are

265
00:14:11.960 --> 00:14:14.799
<v Speaker 1>struggling to pay for childcare in Texas.

266
00:14:16.039 --> 00:14:18.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no question. I mean, you know, maybe I'm burying

267
00:14:18.960 --> 00:14:20.919
<v Speaker 4>the lead a little that, you know, we hoped that

268
00:14:22.000 --> 00:14:24.639
<v Speaker 4>this investment, because of estimates that were provided by the

269
00:14:24.679 --> 00:14:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Texas Workforce Commission during the legislative session, would essentially allow

270
00:14:28.279 --> 00:14:31.279
<v Speaker 4>us to serve around ten thousand more children in the program.

271
00:14:31.279 --> 00:14:33.960
<v Speaker 4>That was their estimates during the legislative session. However, after

272
00:14:33.960 --> 00:14:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the legislative session, the Workforce Commission partners with the University

273
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:41.879
<v Speaker 4>of Texas, who conducts a survey to essentially figure out

274
00:14:41.879 --> 00:14:45.919
<v Speaker 4>how much each of these scholarships costs, and that's based

275
00:14:45.919 --> 00:14:48.320
<v Speaker 4>on the market rate of childcare. And what they unfortunately

276
00:14:48.320 --> 00:14:53.240
<v Speaker 4>found was childcare costs are continuing to skyrocket and what

277
00:14:53.240 --> 00:14:56.480
<v Speaker 4>that means is that the cost of scholarships skyrockets. And

278
00:14:56.480 --> 00:14:59.440
<v Speaker 4>it's a simple math equation if each scholarship costs more,

279
00:14:59.679 --> 00:15:03.399
<v Speaker 4>you can you know, you can't provide as many without

280
00:15:03.440 --> 00:15:05.840
<v Speaker 4>increasing the amount of funds. So this hundred million dollars

281
00:15:06.279 --> 00:15:09.159
<v Speaker 4>was just as essential as we thought it would be. Unfortunately, though,

282
00:15:09.559 --> 00:15:12.639
<v Speaker 4>it was to prevent a reduction of the number of

283
00:15:12.639 --> 00:15:16.000
<v Speaker 4>scholarships rather than to serve more families. So in fact,

284
00:15:16.039 --> 00:15:18.480
<v Speaker 4>the urgency was actually even greater than maybe we presented

285
00:15:18.559 --> 00:15:20.840
<v Speaker 4>during the legislative session, that we were actually at risk

286
00:15:20.919 --> 00:15:24.679
<v Speaker 4>of having to serve fewer children in this program. Fortunately

287
00:15:24.759 --> 00:15:27.320
<v Speaker 4>lawmakers came together to make this investment, but it's a

288
00:15:27.360 --> 00:15:30.039
<v Speaker 4>reminder that we have so much more work to do

289
00:15:30.120 --> 00:15:32.720
<v Speaker 4>to actually serve more parents in the program.

290
00:15:33.240 --> 00:15:35.480
<v Speaker 2>So if one hundred million dollars sort of held the

291
00:15:35.519 --> 00:15:38.440
<v Speaker 2>line or prevented, you know, this program from taking a

292
00:15:38.440 --> 00:15:41.240
<v Speaker 2>step back. Is there like a dollar amount you guys

293
00:15:41.279 --> 00:15:45.000
<v Speaker 2>see that would like what would it cost to make

294
00:15:45.039 --> 00:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that weightless zero?

295
00:15:48.039 --> 00:15:50.679
<v Speaker 4>You know, our goal has not been to make the

296
00:15:50.679 --> 00:15:53.759
<v Speaker 4>weightless zero. I think that you know, even during the

297
00:15:53.799 --> 00:15:58.000
<v Speaker 4>legislative session, we really tried to convey that the goal

298
00:15:58.039 --> 00:16:00.360
<v Speaker 4>is to serve more families. You know, we can increase

299
00:16:00.399 --> 00:16:03.200
<v Speaker 4>the wait lists just by doing a better marketing campaign, right,

300
00:16:03.759 --> 00:16:08.000
<v Speaker 4>and that doesn't necessarily, but if we're serving more families,

301
00:16:08.039 --> 00:16:10.279
<v Speaker 4>I think that's really the goal. So for us, I

302
00:16:10.320 --> 00:16:12.279
<v Speaker 4>think we need to take this, you know, one step

303
00:16:12.320 --> 00:16:14.559
<v Speaker 4>at a time and understand that it's going to take

304
00:16:15.600 --> 00:16:18.519
<v Speaker 4>a number of years, a number of it's gonna take

305
00:16:18.559 --> 00:16:21.840
<v Speaker 4>the state level, the federal level, the local level to

306
00:16:21.919 --> 00:16:24.879
<v Speaker 4>really address this problem. In earnest, it's going to take

307
00:16:24.960 --> 00:16:28.559
<v Speaker 4>us providing more funding for scholarships, but also doing more

308
00:16:28.600 --> 00:16:31.039
<v Speaker 4>to bring down the cost of childcare so that this

309
00:16:31.159 --> 00:16:34.679
<v Speaker 4>cost for scholarships doesn't continue to rise. You know, childcare

310
00:16:34.720 --> 00:16:38.159
<v Speaker 4>programs are facing increased costs across the board, and parents

311
00:16:38.159 --> 00:16:40.279
<v Speaker 4>are bearing the brunt of that right now. So we

312
00:16:40.320 --> 00:16:42.600
<v Speaker 4>need to be able to tackle this one step at

313
00:16:42.600 --> 00:16:45.600
<v Speaker 4>a time. I think we made good progress this legislative session,

314
00:16:45.639 --> 00:16:49.320
<v Speaker 4>but lawmakers, I hope we're getting used to talking about

315
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:52.919
<v Speaker 4>this issue because it's not a one session conversation. Unfortunately,

316
00:16:53.200 --> 00:16:54.360
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot more work to do.

317
00:16:54.639 --> 00:16:55.279
<v Speaker 3>Before we move on.

318
00:16:55.320 --> 00:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you just clarify, just to make sure I understand

319
00:16:57.720 --> 00:17:00.639
<v Speaker 1>it correctly, who's eligible for this program?

320
00:17:00.679 --> 00:17:01.519
<v Speaker 3>How do you get it?

321
00:17:03.159 --> 00:17:08.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it's based on income. It's essentially eighty five

322
00:17:08.160 --> 00:17:10.519
<v Speaker 4>percent of state median income, right, and you have to

323
00:17:10.559 --> 00:17:12.119
<v Speaker 4>have a child under the age of thirteen. You have

324
00:17:12.160 --> 00:17:15.359
<v Speaker 4>to be working or in job training, so there are

325
00:17:15.359 --> 00:17:20.279
<v Speaker 4>work requirements in their income requirements. We also prioritize scholarships

326
00:17:20.279 --> 00:17:22.400
<v Speaker 4>based on a number of factors, including if you have

327
00:17:22.480 --> 00:17:26.440
<v Speaker 4>a child with a disability, or The legislature also passed

328
00:17:26.440 --> 00:17:28.279
<v Speaker 4>to build a session that actually, if you're a child

329
00:17:28.359 --> 00:17:30.920
<v Speaker 4>of a childcare educator, that you're part of this priority list.

330
00:17:30.960 --> 00:17:36.319
<v Speaker 4>So we have priorities among those eligible children. But eighty

331
00:17:36.319 --> 00:17:39.839
<v Speaker 4>five percent of state median income is what that main

332
00:17:39.880 --> 00:17:43.079
<v Speaker 4>eligibility is. So a lot of families are eligible, but

333
00:17:43.200 --> 00:17:47.200
<v Speaker 4>unfortunately the number of scholarships does not meet the demand.

334
00:17:47.720 --> 00:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>And I would imagine there's a lot of families that

335
00:17:49.119 --> 00:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>don't even know that this programming exists.

336
00:17:51.200 --> 00:17:53.039
<v Speaker 2>Said you could double the weight list, probably with a

337
00:17:53.039 --> 00:17:54.000
<v Speaker 2>good marketing campaign.

338
00:17:54.279 --> 00:17:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right, exactly.

339
00:17:55.359 --> 00:17:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's pause for a second to hear from our sponsors.

340
00:17:58.279 --> 00:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Then I want to bring Jaden in to talk about

341
00:18:00.359 --> 00:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the school voucher angle to this. You can give every

342
00:18:05.200 --> 00:18:09.519
<v Speaker 1>text and access to reliable information by giving news this

343
00:18:09.599 --> 00:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Giving Tuesday, your donation strengthens public service reporting. Give now

344
00:18:14.519 --> 00:18:18.839
<v Speaker 1>at Texastribune dot org, slash donate all.

345
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, Jaden.

346
00:18:19.559 --> 00:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about one hundred million dollars toward these

347
00:18:23.720 --> 00:18:27.839
<v Speaker 1>scholarships through the Texas Workforce Commission. Of course, ten times

348
00:18:28.039 --> 00:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that amount was allocated toward school vouchers. The big brunt

349
00:18:33.759 --> 00:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of that conversation, the big conversation among lawmakers advocates of

350
00:18:37.680 --> 00:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>this was that this is needed for you know, parents

351
00:18:41.359 --> 00:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>who have their kids in public schools, you know, over

352
00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the age of five, who maybe are unhappy or not

353
00:18:47.440 --> 00:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>being served well by those schools, wanting to get state

354
00:18:51.000 --> 00:18:54.839
<v Speaker 1>help to go to private schools. Less discussed was the

355
00:18:54.880 --> 00:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>issue that has now come up since the state Controller

356
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:00.559
<v Speaker 1>has been in charge of setting the rules for how

357
00:19:00.559 --> 00:19:03.079
<v Speaker 1>this money will be dispersed, and that is money that

358
00:19:03.200 --> 00:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>goes to three and four year rolds to go to

359
00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>PreK programs, particularly private PreK programs that you know are

360
00:19:10.799 --> 00:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>run you know, all all across the state. Tell us

361
00:19:14.200 --> 00:19:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that discussion and where the state

362
00:19:17.440 --> 00:19:18.519
<v Speaker 1>landed on the issue.

363
00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:20.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So I think it's important to understand kind of

364
00:19:20.759 --> 00:19:22.640
<v Speaker 5>the process and the way things have played out. Right,

365
00:19:22.680 --> 00:19:25.359
<v Speaker 5>So the law passes, which obviously says to framework for

366
00:19:25.480 --> 00:19:28.039
<v Speaker 5>kind of how this is supposed to work. Now the comptroller,

367
00:19:28.200 --> 00:19:31.079
<v Speaker 5>you know, Texas chief financial officers tasked with, hey, here's

368
00:19:31.079 --> 00:19:33.880
<v Speaker 5>the law, here's the framework, now put this into action.

369
00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:37.079
<v Speaker 5>Design kind of a set of basically rules that will

370
00:19:37.160 --> 00:19:39.839
<v Speaker 5>allow you know, parents to be able to understand, for example,

371
00:19:39.839 --> 00:19:41.960
<v Speaker 5>what kind of documentation you need to submit, how certain

372
00:19:42.000 --> 00:19:44.480
<v Speaker 5>processes will work, things that it kind of gets into

373
00:19:44.519 --> 00:19:46.400
<v Speaker 5>the details in the way that the law doesn't, right.

374
00:19:46.480 --> 00:19:48.960
<v Speaker 5>And so what we've seen since the passage of the

375
00:19:49.039 --> 00:19:50.960
<v Speaker 5>law was very much that process.

376
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Right.

377
00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:55.599
<v Speaker 5>There was the introduction of proposed rules and also a

378
00:19:55.599 --> 00:19:58.680
<v Speaker 5>public comment period for people Texans all across you know,

379
00:19:58.720 --> 00:20:01.559
<v Speaker 5>to you know, for their insight and say hey, here's

380
00:20:01.720 --> 00:20:03.400
<v Speaker 5>what we like, what we don't like, what you should change,

381
00:20:03.440 --> 00:20:06.799
<v Speaker 5>what you shouldn't. And so what's happened in that process

382
00:20:06.880 --> 00:20:09.839
<v Speaker 5>is that during the public coming period, they were about

383
00:20:10.119 --> 00:20:13.359
<v Speaker 5>roughly two hundred to three hundred comments, right, and we reviewed.

384
00:20:13.720 --> 00:20:15.039
<v Speaker 5>We were all the ones we could get right with

385
00:20:15.079 --> 00:20:17.839
<v Speaker 5>about two hundreds. So and what we kept seeing was

386
00:20:17.960 --> 00:20:21.799
<v Speaker 5>the overwhelming majority of those comments seemed to be from

387
00:20:21.960 --> 00:20:25.200
<v Speaker 5>private pre K providers who were saying, hey, comtroller, you

388
00:20:25.240 --> 00:20:27.119
<v Speaker 5>seem to have made a mistake, right, And what we're

389
00:20:27.160 --> 00:20:30.480
<v Speaker 5>seeing in the rules that you proposed, was that private

390
00:20:30.599 --> 00:20:33.799
<v Speaker 5>pre K you know families or you know pre K

391
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:37.200
<v Speaker 5>families in general, you kind of allocated and put them

392
00:20:37.200 --> 00:20:40.279
<v Speaker 5>in the bucket of two thousand dollars per student, which

393
00:20:40.519 --> 00:20:44.000
<v Speaker 5>under the law is actually designated for homeschool students. And

394
00:20:44.039 --> 00:20:46.000
<v Speaker 5>what the argument was is that, hey, the law is

395
00:20:46.039 --> 00:20:50.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty clear, you know, pre K students are eligible for

396
00:20:50.039 --> 00:20:53.319
<v Speaker 5>the full roughly ten thousand dollars amounts that you set

397
00:20:53.319 --> 00:20:57.960
<v Speaker 5>aside for everybody else outside of homeschool. And so basically

398
00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:01.079
<v Speaker 5>it went through that process and we arrived at you

399
00:21:01.119 --> 00:21:03.519
<v Speaker 5>know where we did and the most in last week basically,

400
00:21:03.720 --> 00:21:06.440
<v Speaker 5>which was the comtroller, you know, after going through the process,

401
00:21:06.480 --> 00:21:08.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, going through the law and honestly hearing from

402
00:21:08.960 --> 00:21:12.839
<v Speaker 5>the bill authors as well, basically setting in stone that hey,

403
00:21:13.119 --> 00:21:15.960
<v Speaker 5>you guys are right. It is the full ten thousand

404
00:21:16.000 --> 00:21:20.319
<v Speaker 5>dollars amount and as long as students kind of meet

405
00:21:20.519 --> 00:21:23.279
<v Speaker 5>what are currently the free public pre K requirements, they

406
00:21:23.319 --> 00:21:25.799
<v Speaker 5>are they're eligible for the full ten thousand dollars amount now.

407
00:21:25.839 --> 00:21:29.720
<v Speaker 5>And just for clarification, for free public pre K, it's

408
00:21:29.799 --> 00:21:32.559
<v Speaker 5>more of kind of a you know, for students for example,

409
00:21:32.559 --> 00:21:35.880
<v Speaker 5>who are on free and reduced lunch students who you

410
00:21:35.880 --> 00:21:38.319
<v Speaker 5>know are not fluent in English per se. If you're

411
00:21:38.359 --> 00:21:40.519
<v Speaker 5>a child of a public school teacher or you know

412
00:21:40.880 --> 00:21:43.519
<v Speaker 5>someone in the military, right, you be eligible. So there

413
00:21:43.599 --> 00:21:45.359
<v Speaker 5>is a more kind of type framework around that. But

414
00:21:45.359 --> 00:21:46.960
<v Speaker 5>basically that's kind of how we landed at where we

415
00:21:47.000 --> 00:21:47.400
<v Speaker 5>are now.

416
00:21:47.960 --> 00:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I remember being a parent right and

417
00:21:52.039 --> 00:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Zeomike daycare and being sort of shocked at the idea

418
00:21:57.519 --> 00:22:01.079
<v Speaker 1>of I'm paying more in daycare tuition then I would

419
00:22:01.119 --> 00:22:04.759
<v Speaker 1>be paying to send my kid for tuition to go

420
00:22:04.799 --> 00:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to a state university in the state, right, Like, this

421
00:22:07.039 --> 00:22:12.839
<v Speaker 1>is a massive cost. And I think this idea, I

422
00:22:12.880 --> 00:22:14.839
<v Speaker 1>can certainly see why a lot of daycares, a lot

423
00:22:14.839 --> 00:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of people would be saying, like, if you can make

424
00:22:16.680 --> 00:22:19.559
<v Speaker 1>this ten thousand dollars available to us imediately, you know,

425
00:22:19.640 --> 00:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>pre K is a only a couple of years in

426
00:22:22.480 --> 00:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that pre to five year you know, kindergarten time, that's

427
00:22:26.880 --> 00:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a major benefit opportunity for families, you know, upper

428
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:36.319
<v Speaker 1>middle class families at but especially lower income families and

429
00:22:37.000 --> 00:22:37.599
<v Speaker 1>things like that.

430
00:22:38.039 --> 00:22:39.079
<v Speaker 3>What was the argument.

431
00:22:40.000 --> 00:22:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Did they explain why they initially proposed spending less for

432
00:22:43.640 --> 00:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>those parents?

433
00:22:44.759 --> 00:22:46.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know what, It's interesting because there was a

434
00:22:46.799 --> 00:22:48.960
<v Speaker 5>lot of conversations about this. I really don't think it

435
00:22:49.039 --> 00:22:52.640
<v Speaker 5>was anything like intentional per se, right. I think what

436
00:22:52.759 --> 00:22:54.200
<v Speaker 5>happened was and that's why you kind of have the

437
00:22:54.279 --> 00:22:58.359
<v Speaker 5>rule making process was that you know, this was their interpretation.

438
00:22:58.799 --> 00:23:00.599
<v Speaker 5>And really, when you go back and look the law, like,

439
00:23:00.720 --> 00:23:02.839
<v Speaker 5>if you're looking for it, it is clear to say, right

440
00:23:03.039 --> 00:23:05.279
<v Speaker 5>pre k ten k. But if you were, you know,

441
00:23:05.400 --> 00:23:07.799
<v Speaker 5>to the average person just kind of glancing through, unless

442
00:23:07.839 --> 00:23:09.880
<v Speaker 5>you were specifically looking for that, it maybe wouldn't be

443
00:23:09.920 --> 00:23:13.240
<v Speaker 5>something that's the most apparent. And so in the controller

444
00:23:13.240 --> 00:23:15.759
<v Speaker 5>has been very clear Acting Controller Kelly Hancock, you know,

445
00:23:15.799 --> 00:23:17.839
<v Speaker 5>he said publicly right like, we're going to follow the

446
00:23:17.839 --> 00:23:21.000
<v Speaker 5>intent of the law. And so it wasn't necessarily surprising

447
00:23:21.000 --> 00:23:23.160
<v Speaker 5>to me that they changed it to the full ten thousand.

448
00:23:23.200 --> 00:23:24.839
<v Speaker 5>I always expect that that would be the case, and

449
00:23:24.839 --> 00:23:27.240
<v Speaker 5>I just think that this was just a situation where

450
00:23:27.440 --> 00:23:29.519
<v Speaker 5>you go through the rule making process and you know,

451
00:23:29.559 --> 00:23:33.000
<v Speaker 5>you had Representative Brad Buckley and then former Senator Creighton's

452
00:23:33.039 --> 00:23:36.000
<v Speaker 5>now Texas Tech chancellor who submitted written as someone to said, hey,

453
00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:38.079
<v Speaker 5>here's kind of just to clear up many confusion, here's

454
00:23:38.119 --> 00:23:41.519
<v Speaker 5>what we were intending with this and then throughout the process,

455
00:23:41.559 --> 00:23:43.759
<v Speaker 5>you know, they made the adjustment. And so again I

456
00:23:43.759 --> 00:23:45.680
<v Speaker 5>don't think it was anything that was like intentionally we

457
00:23:45.759 --> 00:23:47.680
<v Speaker 5>wanted to be this. It just seemed to be more

458
00:23:47.799 --> 00:23:51.160
<v Speaker 5>again from my perspective that there are so many aspects

459
00:23:51.240 --> 00:23:53.880
<v Speaker 5>of the law, and so the rule making process allowed

460
00:23:53.880 --> 00:23:55.559
<v Speaker 5>them to kind of get it right as intended.

461
00:23:56.200 --> 00:23:58.599
<v Speaker 2>There's always sort of that period. I mean, I think

462
00:23:58.599 --> 00:24:02.400
<v Speaker 2>it comes up of like more and controversial ways than this,

463
00:24:02.519 --> 00:24:05.359
<v Speaker 2>But where the you know, what the legislators wrote into

464
00:24:05.359 --> 00:24:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the law and how the people on the ground actually

465
00:24:07.680 --> 00:24:10.319
<v Speaker 2>have to enact it. Sometimes it's like they're not necessarily

466
00:24:10.400 --> 00:24:13.359
<v Speaker 2>seeing all of the potential roadblocks and then putting into action.

467
00:24:13.440 --> 00:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>You're like, oh, okay, you like not change the law,

468
00:24:16.279 --> 00:24:18.759
<v Speaker 2>but look at the what the intent was at the time.

469
00:24:18.799 --> 00:24:19.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I'll tell you.

470
00:24:19.680 --> 00:24:21.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean that was the one thing I was looking

471
00:24:21.000 --> 00:24:24.400
<v Speaker 5>at with the rules, right, was how much will the

472
00:24:24.400 --> 00:24:27.440
<v Speaker 5>controller on any issue right deviate from what the law

473
00:24:27.480 --> 00:24:28.000
<v Speaker 5>says right?

474
00:24:28.000 --> 00:24:29.160
<v Speaker 3>The law shits a foundation.

475
00:24:29.759 --> 00:24:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Is the controller in a way going to go above

476
00:24:31.640 --> 00:24:33.039
<v Speaker 5>and beyond kind of what that says?

477
00:24:33.200 --> 00:24:33.359
<v Speaker 4>Right?

478
00:24:33.400 --> 00:24:35.000
<v Speaker 5>And so that's why I kind of land at the

479
00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:37.279
<v Speaker 5>conclusion that I have because really on a number of

480
00:24:37.319 --> 00:24:41.759
<v Speaker 5>issues the controller make clear and the way they actually structure,

481
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:45.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, the final rules. The office offered like actually

482
00:24:45.240 --> 00:24:48.480
<v Speaker 5>like detailed commentary to almost like each comment submitted and

483
00:24:48.599 --> 00:24:51.599
<v Speaker 5>explained its rationale for hey, here's why we're going to

484
00:24:51.680 --> 00:24:55.440
<v Speaker 5>decline or accept this suggestion, and again it it. You know,

485
00:24:55.519 --> 00:24:57.359
<v Speaker 5>I think it was pretty clear they you know, they

486
00:24:57.599 --> 00:25:00.400
<v Speaker 5>made it clear that hey, here's you know what, here's

487
00:25:00.400 --> 00:25:02.200
<v Speaker 5>what the law says. Is what the bill author says,

488
00:25:02.240 --> 00:25:03.599
<v Speaker 5>so you know we'll follow that.

489
00:25:03.759 --> 00:25:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was just so struck when I learned about

490
00:25:07.359 --> 00:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this kind of pre K option, about this and my reaction.

491
00:25:10.039 --> 00:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I had a few different reactions. I'm going to sort

492
00:25:11.640 --> 00:25:14.079
<v Speaker 1>of like throw them out there to y'all to get

493
00:25:14.119 --> 00:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you to react to. The first one was just why

494
00:25:16.200 --> 00:25:19.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't they talk about this when they were passing the bill?

495
00:25:19.720 --> 00:25:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Because when this the knowing that it's available for private

496
00:25:24.799 --> 00:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>pre K, it feels to me like it opens up

497
00:25:28.640 --> 00:25:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the pool of people who could benefit from this so

498
00:25:31.680 --> 00:25:34.039
<v Speaker 1>much larger than it was before.

499
00:25:34.160 --> 00:25:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Right.

500
00:25:34.640 --> 00:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll just again bring my own experience in this. My

501
00:25:37.720 --> 00:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>kids go to public school. We're happy with our public school.

502
00:25:40.240 --> 00:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>We don't have any intentions of pulling them out of

503
00:25:42.119 --> 00:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>their public school. But my kids went to private pre K, right,

504
00:25:46.720 --> 00:25:49.079
<v Speaker 1>and we would have been thrilled to join that. I

505
00:25:49.079 --> 00:25:51.839
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that there's a lot of parents in that

506
00:25:51.920 --> 00:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>position now who maybe have no plans on sending their

507
00:25:55.039 --> 00:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>kids to private school, but are going to send their

508
00:25:57.480 --> 00:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>kids to the church down the street, or you know,

509
00:26:00.759 --> 00:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>some other kind of private you know, not associated with

510
00:26:04.279 --> 00:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the school's system for pre K, who now might get

511
00:26:08.519 --> 00:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>significant help from this. So a just a little bit

512
00:26:11.680 --> 00:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of confusion. Coalition, Yeah, why didn't you get those people

513
00:26:15.160 --> 00:26:17.519
<v Speaker 1>on your side when you're advocating for this bill? But

514
00:26:17.599 --> 00:26:21.839
<v Speaker 1>then also does this not create any concerns for the

515
00:26:21.920 --> 00:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>people who were advocating for this of we just dramatically

516
00:26:26.640 --> 00:26:29.319
<v Speaker 1>increased the number of people who are going to want

517
00:26:29.359 --> 00:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to have access to this program in a way that

518
00:26:32.880 --> 00:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a lot more competitive. And that

519
00:26:35.200 --> 00:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars we already knew was going to disappear

520
00:26:38.160 --> 00:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly, now maybe it will disappear.

521
00:26:41.400 --> 00:26:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Even quicker than that.

522
00:26:42.599 --> 00:26:43.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I think if that were to have in

523
00:26:43.839 --> 00:26:46.599
<v Speaker 5>this state, would totally welcome that outcome, right in terms

524
00:26:46.599 --> 00:26:49.440
<v Speaker 5>of the demand, and I think, you know, the expectation

525
00:26:49.640 --> 00:26:53.240
<v Speaker 5>is that you know, demand forward will go above what

526
00:26:53.279 --> 00:26:55.839
<v Speaker 5>the appropriations are and so the different priorities of KI

527
00:26:55.880 --> 00:26:56.839
<v Speaker 5>can and things of that nature.

528
00:26:57.039 --> 00:26:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Men.

529
00:26:57.200 --> 00:26:59.599
<v Speaker 5>I will say, the one thing with the way they

530
00:26:59.599 --> 00:27:02.400
<v Speaker 5>struggle it is that like it's not you know, just

531
00:27:02.480 --> 00:27:04.519
<v Speaker 5>a you know, a mom and pop kind of PreK

532
00:27:04.599 --> 00:27:07.920
<v Speaker 5>provider can can pop up, right, it does require that

533
00:27:08.240 --> 00:27:10.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, what are called education service providers. So in

534
00:27:10.440 --> 00:27:12.920
<v Speaker 5>this case, whoever the pre K provider is right, does

535
00:27:13.039 --> 00:27:16.839
<v Speaker 5>kind of follow the existing requirements for private PreK providers,

536
00:27:16.839 --> 00:27:18.880
<v Speaker 5>which could be for example, I think think it's accreditation

537
00:27:19.000 --> 00:27:22.039
<v Speaker 5>with the state that or had wrote a couple down

538
00:27:22.039 --> 00:27:24.119
<v Speaker 5>as well, it's like good standing with the Department of

539
00:27:24.160 --> 00:27:27.599
<v Speaker 5>Family and Protective Services, you know, different partnerships with you

540
00:27:27.599 --> 00:27:29.559
<v Speaker 5>know a lot of them have existing partnerships with districts

541
00:27:29.599 --> 00:27:32.039
<v Speaker 5>and things of that nature. So the framework that already

542
00:27:32.079 --> 00:27:35.240
<v Speaker 5>exists for private PreK providers is also the framework that

543
00:27:35.599 --> 00:27:38.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, those who you know want to you know,

544
00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:39.920
<v Speaker 5>take part in this program are also going to have

545
00:27:39.920 --> 00:27:43.000
<v Speaker 5>to follow. But it's also to your point, it is interesting.

546
00:27:43.359 --> 00:27:45.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't have the magic answer as to as to

547
00:27:45.759 --> 00:27:47.640
<v Speaker 5>why they didn't talk about it as much. I mean,

548
00:27:47.920 --> 00:27:50.039
<v Speaker 5>there were so many different aspects, and you would think too,

549
00:27:50.079 --> 00:27:51.880
<v Speaker 5>it would have been a talking point given like a

550
00:27:51.880 --> 00:27:54.519
<v Speaker 5>lot of the talk about public school pre K funding, right,

551
00:27:54.559 --> 00:27:57.079
<v Speaker 5>which is a whole that's a whole other conversation, you

552
00:27:57.079 --> 00:27:58.599
<v Speaker 5>know that we could have, you know, you could have

553
00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:02.359
<v Speaker 5>a whole hour long discussion you know about that. But yeah,

554
00:28:02.359 --> 00:28:04.319
<v Speaker 5>it was interesting, and again it was one of those

555
00:28:04.359 --> 00:28:06.599
<v Speaker 5>things that unless you were specifically looking forward in the law,

556
00:28:06.920 --> 00:28:09.079
<v Speaker 5>it wouldn't have been apparent to you because I think

557
00:28:09.119 --> 00:28:11.880
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the focus from lawmakers was on homeschool students.

558
00:28:11.960 --> 00:28:12.039
<v Speaker 3>Right.

559
00:28:12.079 --> 00:28:15.599
<v Speaker 5>It was two categories, right, you're you know, you're you're

560
00:28:15.960 --> 00:28:17.640
<v Speaker 5>the average student who's going to get the average kind

561
00:28:17.640 --> 00:28:19.920
<v Speaker 5>of ten thousand dollars or the up to thirty thousand

562
00:28:20.000 --> 00:28:22.599
<v Speaker 5>if you know you're a student with the IEP, you know,

563
00:28:22.640 --> 00:28:25.599
<v Speaker 5>student with a disability, and then the separate bucket for

564
00:28:25.680 --> 00:28:28.319
<v Speaker 5>homeschool students. And so it wasn't kind of apparent again

565
00:28:28.400 --> 00:28:30.359
<v Speaker 5>until you know, you go through two hundred and three

566
00:28:30.440 --> 00:28:34.119
<v Speaker 5>hundred comments and literally clearly the private pre cab bodies

567
00:28:34.200 --> 00:28:37.000
<v Speaker 5>knew about this because and they all copied and pasted

568
00:28:37.079 --> 00:28:39.759
<v Speaker 5>the same messaging across the board. So clearly it was

569
00:28:39.759 --> 00:28:43.240
<v Speaker 5>a very coordinated effort, and everybody kind of was in

570
00:28:43.240 --> 00:28:44.599
<v Speaker 5>the know one kind of what was happening.

571
00:28:44.720 --> 00:28:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the other thing. My other reaction to this was Wow,

572
00:28:51.240 --> 00:28:56.519
<v Speaker 1>this this has sort of stealthily become the biggest state

573
00:28:56.599 --> 00:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>investment in you know, these childcareage topics that we've seen.

574
00:29:04.279 --> 00:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, David, what your reaction to my reaction to

575
00:29:09.599 --> 00:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that is, Like, am I right in thinking that that's

576
00:29:11.920 --> 00:29:14.759
<v Speaker 1>possibly the case? How do you feel about this scenario?

577
00:29:15.640 --> 00:29:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's going to be really interesting because and

578
00:29:18.920 --> 00:29:21.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, you asked the question of why this wasn't

579
00:29:21.440 --> 00:29:23.559
<v Speaker 4>a bigger topic during the session, And I do think

580
00:29:23.799 --> 00:29:26.039
<v Speaker 4>this is something we run into in early childood education

581
00:29:26.079 --> 00:29:30.160
<v Speaker 4>all the time, which is anytime it's a K through

582
00:29:30.200 --> 00:29:34.480
<v Speaker 4>twelve discussion and pre K has implications. These sorts of

583
00:29:34.519 --> 00:29:37.480
<v Speaker 4>issues pop up because the way we govern our pre

584
00:29:37.559 --> 00:29:39.720
<v Speaker 4>K program. If you're a parent of a child of

585
00:29:39.759 --> 00:29:43.119
<v Speaker 4>a four year old, your access points to education are

586
00:29:43.200 --> 00:29:44.920
<v Speaker 4>very different than when you're a parent of a five

587
00:29:44.960 --> 00:29:47.000
<v Speaker 4>year old. When you're a parent of a five year old,

588
00:29:47.039 --> 00:29:50.440
<v Speaker 4>you have access to a universal kindergarten program that is

589
00:29:50.480 --> 00:29:54.079
<v Speaker 4>available in every corner of the state for free. If

590
00:29:54.119 --> 00:29:56.119
<v Speaker 4>you have a four year old. There are some families

591
00:29:56.279 --> 00:30:00.319
<v Speaker 4>eligible for free pre K, but many families are on

592
00:30:00.359 --> 00:30:02.640
<v Speaker 4>their own and they are looking at private options because

593
00:30:02.799 --> 00:30:05.039
<v Speaker 4>there's not a public option available to them. I think

594
00:30:05.039 --> 00:30:09.240
<v Speaker 4>it's really worth re emphasizing what Jayden said, which is

595
00:30:09.720 --> 00:30:13.519
<v Speaker 4>the ESA program is universal, but for pre K it's not.

596
00:30:13.799 --> 00:30:17.519
<v Speaker 4>It's still only those families who are eligible for public

597
00:30:17.559 --> 00:30:19.480
<v Speaker 4>pre K, those who are on free and reduced lunch

598
00:30:19.759 --> 00:30:21.920
<v Speaker 4>or meet one of the other eligibility criteria. So there's

599
00:30:21.920 --> 00:30:24.880
<v Speaker 4>going to be a lot of parents who are parents

600
00:30:24.920 --> 00:30:27.279
<v Speaker 4>of four year old who think great, I have access

601
00:30:27.359 --> 00:30:31.519
<v Speaker 4>to financial aid for pre K, which these families really

602
00:30:31.559 --> 00:30:34.880
<v Speaker 4>need because they don't necessarily have a public school option

603
00:30:35.039 --> 00:30:37.559
<v Speaker 4>right now, but they're not going to be eligible for this.

604
00:30:37.640 --> 00:30:41.400
<v Speaker 4>It's just those who are part of existing pre K eligibility.

605
00:30:41.440 --> 00:30:45.839
<v Speaker 4>So I think we really need to watch and see

606
00:30:45.880 --> 00:30:48.480
<v Speaker 4>how many families actually are able to navigate that. Because

607
00:30:48.759 --> 00:30:52.519
<v Speaker 4>these other grades don't have the as restrictive of eligibility criteria,

608
00:30:52.839 --> 00:30:55.359
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be a lot of implementation questions here.

609
00:30:55.680 --> 00:30:57.039
<v Speaker 4>You know, one of the ways that you can be

610
00:30:57.039 --> 00:30:59.440
<v Speaker 4>eligible for free pre K is to be a child

611
00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:02.079
<v Speaker 4>who's homelandanguage is not English. That's done through a home

612
00:31:02.160 --> 00:31:04.279
<v Speaker 4>language survey by the school district. How's that going to

613
00:31:04.279 --> 00:31:07.200
<v Speaker 4>be done with an essay? We don't know yet. We

614
00:31:07.200 --> 00:31:09.720
<v Speaker 4>haven't seen guidance on that yet. So I think that

615
00:31:10.279 --> 00:31:13.039
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of questions about how many children actually

616
00:31:13.119 --> 00:31:16.759
<v Speaker 4>will ultimately end up being served that are for year

617
00:31:16.759 --> 00:31:19.960
<v Speaker 4>olds and three year olds. I think that the demand

618
00:31:20.039 --> 00:31:22.960
<v Speaker 4>is certainly significant, as we've seen from the Childcare Services Program,

619
00:31:23.000 --> 00:31:25.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of parents want access to financial aid for

620
00:31:25.920 --> 00:31:28.640
<v Speaker 4>early childhood education. I think we don't know how many

621
00:31:28.680 --> 00:31:30.039
<v Speaker 4>of them are going to end up with the essays,

622
00:31:30.079 --> 00:31:33.519
<v Speaker 4>but I would remind folks that the Childcare Services Program

623
00:31:33.599 --> 00:31:36.839
<v Speaker 4>is a financial aid program for parents to access childcare

624
00:31:36.880 --> 00:31:41.119
<v Speaker 4>as well, and it has a much more generous eligibility

625
00:31:41.200 --> 00:31:43.440
<v Speaker 4>than the essays do. So we're gonna have to see

626
00:31:43.440 --> 00:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>how all these puzzle pieces fit together, but we're curious

627
00:31:46.640 --> 00:31:48.000
<v Speaker 4>to see how many families benefit.

628
00:31:48.559 --> 00:31:50.599
<v Speaker 5>I would say to add to I think the free

629
00:31:50.640 --> 00:31:53.680
<v Speaker 5>public pre K requirements also limits it to three year olds, right,

630
00:31:53.720 --> 00:31:55.480
<v Speaker 5>so you actually won't have the four year olds in

631
00:31:55.519 --> 00:31:58.279
<v Speaker 5>the category as well, which is interesting. But it made

632
00:31:58.279 --> 00:32:00.400
<v Speaker 5>me think something that David was saying earlier. We're talking

633
00:32:00.400 --> 00:32:04.000
<v Speaker 5>about the scholarship right in and sort of the awareness

634
00:32:04.279 --> 00:32:06.440
<v Speaker 5>right anytime. I think we all know this right when

635
00:32:06.480 --> 00:32:09.359
<v Speaker 5>you're you've seen kind of these, you know, big programs

636
00:32:09.400 --> 00:32:12.960
<v Speaker 5>that specifically target you know, low income families. One of

637
00:32:13.000 --> 00:32:16.279
<v Speaker 5>the big hurdles, as was acknowledged here is the awareness component,

638
00:32:17.319 --> 00:32:20.079
<v Speaker 5>and it'll be interesting to see it if that changes

639
00:32:20.119 --> 00:32:22.079
<v Speaker 5>at all here, right. I think one of the things

640
00:32:22.119 --> 00:32:24.759
<v Speaker 5>that voucher advocates had talked about, you know, one of

641
00:32:24.799 --> 00:32:26.799
<v Speaker 5>the benefits they saw in this program was that hey,

642
00:32:26.799 --> 00:32:28.759
<v Speaker 5>we actually have a whole year to get the word

643
00:32:28.799 --> 00:32:31.359
<v Speaker 5>out about all the different benefits of it in ways

644
00:32:31.359 --> 00:32:33.519
<v Speaker 5>that a state like Tennessee, for example, they passed their

645
00:32:33.720 --> 00:32:37.559
<v Speaker 5>law and they were ready to roll you know soon after. Again,

646
00:32:37.599 --> 00:32:39.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how much it's going to change. I

647
00:32:39.039 --> 00:32:41.720
<v Speaker 5>think ultimately what you'll see is what we see, you know,

648
00:32:41.880 --> 00:32:44.920
<v Speaker 5>with these huge universal programs, is that especially in these

649
00:32:44.920 --> 00:32:47.079
<v Speaker 5>early years, you're going to see those like for example,

650
00:32:47.400 --> 00:32:50.160
<v Speaker 5>look at for example, you had all these private pre

651
00:32:50.279 --> 00:32:53.440
<v Speaker 5>K providers who had who had testified and said hey,

652
00:32:53.519 --> 00:32:56.079
<v Speaker 5>this isn't right. Those are probably going to be the

653
00:32:56.519 --> 00:32:58.880
<v Speaker 5>providers who go to families who will qualify and say hey,

654
00:32:59.480 --> 00:33:00.880
<v Speaker 5>if you don't know about this. Hey, this is a

655
00:33:00.880 --> 00:33:04.960
<v Speaker 5>benefit you can have, right, so initially you probably see

656
00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:07.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, the students who ultimately benefit from it will

657
00:33:07.319 --> 00:33:09.759
<v Speaker 5>be those who already in some way are connected to

658
00:33:09.759 --> 00:33:12.000
<v Speaker 5>people who are kind of in the know, and it'll

659
00:33:12.000 --> 00:33:14.720
<v Speaker 5>be a challenge for the state over time with the

660
00:33:14.880 --> 00:33:18.559
<v Speaker 5>entire program, with the awareness component, like we see with

661
00:33:18.640 --> 00:33:19.839
<v Speaker 5>all these other programs as well.

662
00:33:19.920 --> 00:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Okay, I want to test one more reaction with

663
00:33:24.000 --> 00:33:25.119
<v Speaker 1>with you, David, which.

664
00:33:24.960 --> 00:33:28.079
<v Speaker 2>Is one may not have another kid to try to

665
00:33:28.079 --> 00:33:28.559
<v Speaker 2>get this right.

666
00:33:28.640 --> 00:33:29.359
<v Speaker 3>That's question.

667
00:33:30.559 --> 00:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry, don't worry. That is that is not my

668
00:33:33.039 --> 00:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>reaction at all. Yes, you know, one thing we haven't

669
00:33:38.160 --> 00:33:42.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about much lately is this. We've talked a lot

670
00:33:42.400 --> 00:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>about the financial struggle for parents. We haven't talked as

671
00:33:45.039 --> 00:33:50.039
<v Speaker 1>much about the financial struggle for these actual daycare centers. Again,

672
00:33:50.279 --> 00:33:55.119
<v Speaker 1>citing your report, childcare programs are operating on barely sustainable

673
00:33:55.119 --> 00:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>profit margins you say, typically less than one percent, which

674
00:33:58.400 --> 00:34:02.119
<v Speaker 1>puts them at considerable risk of closure. That is, even

675
00:34:02.160 --> 00:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>though childcare educators are paid on average around twelve dollars

676
00:34:06.200 --> 00:34:10.239
<v Speaker 1>per hour with little to know benefits. The challenge here,

677
00:34:10.360 --> 00:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues that I have heard about as

678
00:34:13.480 --> 00:34:16.079
<v Speaker 1>I have been an interested person in this subject, is

679
00:34:16.119 --> 00:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the battle for three and four year olds.

680
00:34:18.400 --> 00:34:18.599
<v Speaker 3>Right.

681
00:34:19.000 --> 00:34:26.159
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that happens is in day care facilities,

682
00:34:26.239 --> 00:34:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's much more expensive to care for the infants than

683
00:34:29.800 --> 00:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it is to care for the three and four year

684
00:34:32.840 --> 00:34:37.280
<v Speaker 1>olds because the infants need more attention, they're less able

685
00:34:37.320 --> 00:34:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to sort of, you know, obviously take care of themselves.

686
00:34:39.760 --> 00:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>You need more adults per child in that area. There

687
00:34:44.880 --> 00:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>has been a push, a very well intentioned push to

688
00:34:48.119 --> 00:34:51.119
<v Speaker 1>get more three and four year olds into public pre k.

689
00:34:51.719 --> 00:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But what that does is it takes away the sort

690
00:34:54.519 --> 00:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>of profit generators for the daycare operators and leaves them

691
00:35:00.239 --> 00:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>having to care for, you know, or care for a

692
00:35:02.519 --> 00:35:05.679
<v Speaker 1>higher percentage of infants compared to three or four year olds,

693
00:35:07.400 --> 00:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>which either forces them to lose revenue, go out of business,

694
00:35:13.039 --> 00:35:16.639
<v Speaker 1>or increase their prices for the infants and everything like that.

695
00:35:17.719 --> 00:35:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Does this create a situation where maybe you can pull

696
00:35:21.559 --> 00:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>some of those three and four year olds back into

697
00:35:24.000 --> 00:35:27.599
<v Speaker 1>these private daycare providers, which can make them more financially

698
00:35:27.679 --> 00:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>sustainable or allow them to make infant care more affordable

699
00:35:32.920 --> 00:35:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the general population. What do you think

700
00:35:36.800 --> 00:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about that possibility.

701
00:35:38.000 --> 00:35:41.719
<v Speaker 4>David, Yeah, I mean, I do want to just speak

702
00:35:41.800 --> 00:35:44.519
<v Speaker 4>quickly about you know, your point about the struggle that

703
00:35:44.679 --> 00:35:46.719
<v Speaker 4>truck care providers are facing, because it is significant. Again,

704
00:35:46.760 --> 00:35:49.039
<v Speaker 4>that is why the scholarship costs are going up. You know,

705
00:35:49.079 --> 00:35:52.159
<v Speaker 4>they're facing rising labor costs. They're paying around twelve dollars

706
00:35:52.159 --> 00:35:55.199
<v Speaker 4>per hour, but they're losing staff to BUCkies and Amazon

707
00:35:55.400 --> 00:35:57.920
<v Speaker 4>and all sorts of places, so they have to try

708
00:35:57.960 --> 00:36:00.719
<v Speaker 4>to compete, which means those costs go up, and that

709
00:36:00.760 --> 00:36:03.960
<v Speaker 4>means parents pay more. They're rising food costs if childcare

710
00:36:04.000 --> 00:36:06.679
<v Speaker 4>program provides food. We all can look at our grocery

711
00:36:06.679 --> 00:36:08.960
<v Speaker 4>bill and see that that's going to affect childcare providers.

712
00:36:09.119 --> 00:36:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Insurance is crushing right now, so childcare programs are facing

713
00:36:13.079 --> 00:36:17.320
<v Speaker 4>rising insurance costs, rent property taxes they face that as well,

714
00:36:17.639 --> 00:36:20.639
<v Speaker 4>and parents are bearing the brunt of all of those increases,

715
00:36:20.719 --> 00:36:25.039
<v Speaker 4>right And so, just like we would never rely on

716
00:36:25.800 --> 00:36:29.280
<v Speaker 4>tolls to pay for our entire highway system, relying on

717
00:36:29.440 --> 00:36:32.360
<v Speaker 4>just parents to pay for the full brunt of early

718
00:36:32.440 --> 00:36:36.559
<v Speaker 4>care and education leads to these really unfortunate outcomes that

719
00:36:36.639 --> 00:36:40.239
<v Speaker 4>we see. And so I understand deeply the pain that

720
00:36:40.320 --> 00:36:43.840
<v Speaker 4>childcare providers are feeling and the hope that these these

721
00:36:43.880 --> 00:36:47.199
<v Speaker 4>opportunities give. I would say about just you know, the

722
00:36:47.480 --> 00:36:50.599
<v Speaker 4>idea that we need to consider pulling you know, folks

723
00:36:50.599 --> 00:36:53.079
<v Speaker 4>from these public settings and ensure that they return to

724
00:36:53.159 --> 00:36:56.360
<v Speaker 4>private settings. First of all, I think it's important to

725
00:36:56.480 --> 00:36:58.840
<v Speaker 4>remind us why they choose these public settings, which is

726
00:36:58.840 --> 00:37:00.679
<v Speaker 4>that they can afford them. And I think we want

727
00:37:00.679 --> 00:37:03.199
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that families can afford high quality options

728
00:37:03.239 --> 00:37:05.199
<v Speaker 4>in a variety of settings, whether that be a head

729
00:37:05.199 --> 00:37:09.679
<v Speaker 4>start program, a childcare program, a for profit nonprofit. We

730
00:37:09.719 --> 00:37:11.440
<v Speaker 4>also want to make sure parents, if they want to

731
00:37:11.519 --> 00:37:13.400
<v Speaker 4>keep their kid at home, have the resources to do that,

732
00:37:14.840 --> 00:37:17.880
<v Speaker 4>and the public schools in many cases a good option

733
00:37:17.960 --> 00:37:20.000
<v Speaker 4>for them. I also think it's important to remember that

734
00:37:20.119 --> 00:37:22.000
<v Speaker 4>only about half of four year olds in our state

735
00:37:22.039 --> 00:37:24.400
<v Speaker 4>are enrolled in public pre K, so there are plenty

736
00:37:24.400 --> 00:37:27.400
<v Speaker 4>of four year olds to go around, and I think

737
00:37:27.440 --> 00:37:31.280
<v Speaker 4>we should make sure that they can afford and access

738
00:37:31.320 --> 00:37:34.159
<v Speaker 4>these high quality programs, and many of them will choose

739
00:37:34.280 --> 00:37:36.719
<v Speaker 4>private options if they have the ability to. And for

740
00:37:36.719 --> 00:37:38.159
<v Speaker 4>three year olds, I will say it's even less. It's

741
00:37:38.159 --> 00:37:40.119
<v Speaker 4>only around eleven percent of three year olds are enrolled

742
00:37:40.119 --> 00:37:44.280
<v Speaker 4>in public schools, so there's plenty of children. I don't

743
00:37:44.280 --> 00:37:47.360
<v Speaker 4>think it has to be a competition between these settings.

744
00:37:47.400 --> 00:37:51.119
<v Speaker 4>I think we can do more to make childcare and

745
00:37:51.199 --> 00:37:55.880
<v Speaker 4>preschool more affordable, more high quality across settings, and I

746
00:37:55.880 --> 00:37:58.320
<v Speaker 4>think the legislator took some promising steps, but yeah, we

747
00:37:58.360 --> 00:37:59.159
<v Speaker 4>have a lot more work to do.

748
00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Can I ask one good question that David, I'm curious

749
00:38:02.519 --> 00:38:04.199
<v Speaker 5>like to you. And one of the things I've heard

750
00:38:04.199 --> 00:38:06.440
<v Speaker 5>though about the pre k thing is is just a

751
00:38:06.519 --> 00:38:09.239
<v Speaker 5>general concern. It's something like an optic conversation right where

752
00:38:09.239 --> 00:38:14.239
<v Speaker 5>it's like, even after this legislative session, the state still

753
00:38:14.320 --> 00:38:17.800
<v Speaker 5>isn't funding public pre k at a full day level, right,

754
00:38:17.840 --> 00:38:19.559
<v Speaker 5>which I know has been some of the concern of

755
00:38:19.639 --> 00:38:21.679
<v Speaker 5>advocates and whatnot. And so you're going to have some

756
00:38:21.760 --> 00:38:24.559
<v Speaker 5>who come out and say, well, clearly, if the will

757
00:38:24.639 --> 00:38:26.360
<v Speaker 5>is there, you can get it done because you've set

758
00:38:26.360 --> 00:38:30.239
<v Speaker 5>aside money now for private PreK providers you know, to

759
00:38:30.280 --> 00:38:31.760
<v Speaker 5>be able to benefit from this. How do you look

760
00:38:31.760 --> 00:38:34.159
<v Speaker 5>at that kind of argument and that kind of debate

761
00:38:34.199 --> 00:38:36.039
<v Speaker 5>that folks will have Avialy.

762
00:38:37.480 --> 00:38:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I think that there there's a lot

763
00:38:41.400 --> 00:38:45.000
<v Speaker 4>of rea. Like I said, I think from a parent's perspective,

764
00:38:45.039 --> 00:38:47.199
<v Speaker 4>the way we do things doesn't seem to make a

765
00:38:47.239 --> 00:38:49.559
<v Speaker 4>lot of sense. If you have a four year old,

766
00:38:49.960 --> 00:38:52.800
<v Speaker 4>you are lost in trying to figure out what is

767
00:38:53.280 --> 00:38:55.480
<v Speaker 4>an option for you and your family. You're trying to

768
00:38:55.519 --> 00:39:00.480
<v Speaker 4>figure out how to cut costs to or this. Do

769
00:39:00.519 --> 00:39:03.000
<v Speaker 4>you quit just one of you quit your job so

770
00:39:03.039 --> 00:39:05.000
<v Speaker 4>that you can just stay at home with your kid

771
00:39:05.039 --> 00:39:07.320
<v Speaker 4>because the costs for care are so expensive. But then

772
00:39:07.360 --> 00:39:10.039
<v Speaker 4>the moment your child turns five, it's like, Okay, great,

773
00:39:10.079 --> 00:39:12.559
<v Speaker 4>now I have a universal program that I can enroll in.

774
00:39:13.159 --> 00:39:15.079
<v Speaker 4>I think that a parent of a four year old

775
00:39:15.079 --> 00:39:16.440
<v Speaker 4>and a parent of a five year old feel like

776
00:39:16.480 --> 00:39:19.760
<v Speaker 4>their needs are similar, but the way the state responds

777
00:39:19.840 --> 00:39:22.400
<v Speaker 4>is quite different, whether they be in public schools or not.

778
00:39:22.440 --> 00:39:26.039
<v Speaker 4>So I think whether you're a superintendent or a childcare

779
00:39:26.239 --> 00:39:29.239
<v Speaker 4>program director, you have a lot to say that, hey,

780
00:39:29.239 --> 00:39:31.159
<v Speaker 4>the state needs to do way more than we're doing,

781
00:39:31.679 --> 00:39:34.559
<v Speaker 4>and we are ready to play a role in helping

782
00:39:34.639 --> 00:39:39.119
<v Speaker 4>provide those high quality options for families because I just

783
00:39:40.000 --> 00:39:43.320
<v Speaker 4>I really just don't think that. I think the competition

784
00:39:43.440 --> 00:39:46.559
<v Speaker 4>that gets presented between these sites is really missing the mark.

785
00:39:46.639 --> 00:39:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Like I think everybody struggling to meet the needs of

786
00:39:50.400 --> 00:39:55.800
<v Speaker 4>these families because we're not investing enough in famili's ability

787
00:39:55.840 --> 00:39:59.559
<v Speaker 4>to access these programs. So our perspective at Texans Care

788
00:39:59.599 --> 00:40:01.480
<v Speaker 4>for Children it is that we want families to be

789
00:40:01.519 --> 00:40:05.320
<v Speaker 4>able to afford an access private settings, public settings, and

790
00:40:05.400 --> 00:40:07.719
<v Speaker 4>we want them to have the resources to figure out

791
00:40:07.719 --> 00:40:09.360
<v Speaker 4>what best meets their families' needs.

792
00:40:10.199 --> 00:40:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think we found the solution here.

793
00:40:11.800 --> 00:40:15.079
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that you know, the employees can get better

794
00:40:15.119 --> 00:40:17.320
<v Speaker 1>wages at BUCkies, and I think we just need to

795
00:40:17.320 --> 00:40:20.280
<v Speaker 1>put childcare and all the BUCkies. Yeah right, they're in

796
00:40:20.320 --> 00:40:21.519
<v Speaker 1>rural areas.

797
00:40:21.239 --> 00:40:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Right, they're everywhere, very popular. Yeah, building new ones every day, exactly, exactly.

798
00:40:25.760 --> 00:40:27.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, great job everybody. Yeah, solved.

799
00:40:28.280 --> 00:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, I think thank you so much David for

800
00:40:32.960 --> 00:40:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I think what has been a really informative discussion. Thank

801
00:40:36.159 --> 00:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you as well to Jaden and Eleanor. Thank you to

802
00:40:39.599 --> 00:40:42.559
<v Speaker 1>our producers, Rob and Chris, and thank you to our sponsors,

803
00:40:42.599 --> 00:40:46.119
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Tribune Membership program Texas Tribune dot org slash

804
00:40:46.199 --> 00:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>donate to keep this podcast and all of our journalism

805
00:40:50.519 --> 00:40:53.519
<v Speaker 1>free and available to anyone who wants to access it.

806
00:40:53.960 --> 00:40:55.000
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back next week.

807
00:41:07.960 --> 00:41:08.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah,
