Speaker 1: Welcome back. Another sort of are interesting times? Is my
pleasure to peak on? Is back on the show? Pete?
How are you doing?
Speaker 2: I'm doing, good, tim How are you very well?
Speaker 1: Thank you well, Pete? Here we are we're lesson. Is
it less than two weeks away from me?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's like what ten eleven days? Eleven days? Maybe?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Now do elections matter in an occupied country?
Speaker 2: It's a great question, man, that's a great question. I
would say. If you're hoping for an incredible amount of change, nope.
If you're hoping that the people who probably well we
know occupy our government, they'll be gone, nope. All we
can hope for, I think at this point is just
the boot off of our neck for you know, two
to four years, so that we can prepare for the
future and maybe build something, or you know, some people
may even want to escape. But yeah, I'm more for
take the boot off of my neck so I can
get some things done and properly prepare for the future
without having to worry about, you know, the drone strike
on my house or something.
Speaker 1: Well, I guess unfound analysis, life is about just living
another day.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, so let me live another three hundred and
sixty five times four and I'll be happy.
Speaker 1: There you go. Now we have a couple of things.
Apparently two stories about Donald Trump. Apparently he has he
was a Senator Kelly who said that Trump had said
something about he wished he had generals like Hitler had
or something. What's this latest thing?
Speaker 2: I think he's I think Trump said that he wished
it he had generals that weren't trends. It's like, well, yeah,
that was just that means you know, Hitler Hitler, Okay.
Speaker 1: So something that that I guess, something like Rommel the
Desert Fox to get things done. I don't know. He
was good at text, wasn't he was?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it seems like the newest one that they're trying
to remove him on, or not really remove him on. Yeah.
I'm just fully convinced they're trying to signal to not
even like private individuals, but factions within the government that yeah,
may may just be sitting there doing nothing that yeah,
maybe we should take this guy out. But I think
that that's everything I'm seeing points towards they're trying to
get him killed.
Speaker 1: I mean, is Donald Trump a fascist? I think it's
just a kind of a boomer liberal right.
Speaker 2: And finally, if Donald Trump was a fascist, yeah, I
would be way more excited about the future.
Speaker 1: WHOA, that's get something done. Here is prove she means something.
Speaker 2: I wish that he was. I wish that he was
ten percent of his what his enemies accused him of being.
Speaker 1: So they're really going with the Hitler thing the final
two weeks of the campaign. They're trying to pull out
a Hitler accusation.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And the crazy thing about it is, you go
to Hitler, you appeal to Hitler. After two years of
Hitler's speeches being translated into English and using AI, them
being disseminated everywhere all over social media, especially on X
and people going, Okay, well it sounds like he's describing
here right now. Well that that's weird. I thought he
was just he just wanted to kill all the Jews.
So no, well, I think what he's doing is he's
describing what people like the World Jewish Congress and Dennis
Prager brag about that Jews were responsible for all the
isms except Nazism, feminism, communism, capitalism, socialism, all the isms,
and that was what Hitler was talking about when he
said when he said to jew he really just meant Bolshevik,
and he saw them as the ultimate enemy. And what
we've seen is is that a lot of Jewish activists
are very proud of the things that they've done, which
a lot of us would say contributed to the downfall
and cultural rote that we see in our society. And
when you point out that, they celebrate that, you're anti
Semitic and you're Hitler and you want to vote for Hitler,
and since you're voting for Donald Trump, donald Trump is Hitler.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it is u. If you look at something like Bolshevism, feminism,
these things, whatever is these are our propulance or subsets
of the Jewish revolutionary spirit, you know, manifested the modern
political ideology. So it's you know, they do take pride
in it when it suits them. There is a funny
thing where again, if you acknowledge their success and their
influence at the same time hold it responsible for the
current state of things. Given the fact you've acknowledged their influence,
they accuse you of being an anti Semite. We control
everything because we're so smart and so talented. But if
you blame us for anything, you're an anti Semite. As
their contradiction there of course, because you have to take
responsibility for the power that you openly boast about that
you have.
Speaker 2: So and one thing I've taken some pointing out is
is that whenever anybody attacks anti semit to quote unquote
anti Semites, like Christopher Ruffo did in a piece for Compact,
and it turns out that Compact is funded by George Soros,
and people are like, George Soros isn't a Zionist. Now,
George Soros is a Zionist. He's just on the left
side of the Zionist spectrum. He doesn't like Lakud and
they don't like him. But one thing that I've tried
to point out is that they always say you're jealous
of their or our successes, And I try to point
out that I think you're talking about personal successes like
you can get the job, like you can get rich.
But in getting rich, what exactly did you accomplish for
other people in taking power, in being sixty to eighty
percent of Biden's cabinet and pretty much one hundred percent
of the most important positions in government. Well, most people
look at our government and say, wow, things are really bad.
So when they say when someone accuses me of being
jealous of their success. I'm kind of wondering how they
got the job when it's obvious they're terrible at the job,
and how they keep getting hired over and over again
for the same job when it's obvious they can't do
that job. Or either they can't do the job or
they're maliciously not doing it. They're maliciously not doing it
well on purpose. So what is it? I'm not Asians
are a lot of people from Asia are very very successful,
very popular, have very high iq do very well. If
they were sixty to eighty percent of Biden's cabinet and
pretty much one hundred percent of the most important positions
and them and the government looks like it did, I
would be asking the Asian question, first of all, why
are these people running? I think that would be a
lot easier for people in America to see because Asians
don't look like heritage Americans. But you know a lot
of Jewish people have it can blend in well. You
know Bill Ackman who dyes his hair blonde and tries
to look like a wasp. The Sure, you're successful, but
what what have you built? What if you contributed? When
I'm looking at governance specifically, and especially when I'm looking
at cultural relevance and you see people of Jewish ancestry
taking credit for it all, and yet it all has
resulted in chaos, failure, and whatever it is that we have. Now,
I have to ask are you just incompetent? Or is
this or is this malicious? Are you doing this on purpose?
And I think anybody would ask that question. You would
ask that question if the government was made of heritage Americans,
you know a bunch of scot Irish people and it
was this terrible You'd be like, okay, and they were
doing ads for oh, look how proud we are of
our scotch Irish heritage, and scotch Irish people gave you
feminism and gave you this and gave you that. I'd
be like, well, what's wrong with scott Irish people? But
when it's Jewish people taking the credit for it, you're
not allowed to ask that question. Because Holocaust.
Speaker 1: Recently, I did a show on this guy, Victor Horn,
not Victor Horn, Trent Horn.
Speaker 2: There you go, ah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: Trent Horn. Anyone's there. The Catholic answers, and he condemned Holocausts.
Revisionist or Holocaust. You know, I guess he calls him deniers,
the people who are critical of the Holocaust narrative. And
he called it a moral suggesting that it was a sin.
And so basically you can't question any you know, the
ever changing Holocaust narrative or narratives without becoming I guess,
a bad person. He called it indecent and that sort
of thing. Well, yeah, it's whether it's indecent or not.
Speaker 2: I don't know where's that f fall in the commandments?
I've heard twenty numerous times. Where does that fall?
Speaker 1: He's one of these Christian crusaders for Jewish supremacy. He's
trying to lick Jewish boots to get power, I guess,
to get job security or status or something. You may
generally believe in the Holocaust, I guess the narrative. But nevertheless,
what he's saying, you cannot question it, nor does he
subsiquently take on the you know, the research that is
challenged the narrative. He just condemns it and suggests that
the Catholic Church consent when it doesn't. Actually, there's nothing
in the Catholic doctrine says you have to you know,
believe in a Jewish narrative regarding World War Two, but
it is an effective intimidate and intimidating people. Recently, had
I Michael Jones, and I asked him if I was
reading his book The Holocaust Narrative, or I was reading
John Beaumont's book The Truth Are Such a Free which
is a sort of a legal treatment of the various Holocausts.
Then cases and characters who have questioned the Holocaust narrator,
and he goes through the evidence. If I read those
two books and I happened to share it with a friend,
am I committing a sin just for the information I'm
passing on? And and he said, it's almost like that
if you confess that, the priest would ask you, well,
did you take pleasure in it? Like you're reading a
pornography magazine or something? You know. It's like, well, no,
it's not. It's not a sin to question these things
that it's not necessarily bad. It's it's just you're intellectually curious.
You see problems in a narrative, and it's important in
debating these things because I gus, you said the Holocaust
narrative has granted the Jews immunity from any criticism, have
an exercise and accumulate power, and they're influence in our government.
Speaker 2: Of course. Well, you know, you can accept the numbers,
you know, six million, you can accept the gas chambers,
you can do all of that. But you can't stop there.
You're not allowed just to accept it. You have to
grieve over it. It's like you're it's not enough to
be anti anti Semitic. You have to be like the
you have to be you have to be the biggest
philo semi on the planet. You're not allowed and you
know we learned, especially on social media on x after
October seventh, you were not You're not allowed to have
a poor opinion of Israel, say they asked for it,
that this was inevitable. You're not allowed to say, well,
I don't want anything to do with this. No, you
have to be genuinely grieved. You have to be genuinely upset.
You have to want to you know, bomb bomb civilians,
and if you don't, you're an anti Semite. And it's
the same thing is if you accept the complete narrative
about what happened in you know, in the camps in
the East, but you say, well, you know, sure, that's fine,
but other people have suffered genocide attempts, like the Armenians,
and pretty much a lot of groups have suffered attempts
at that over over the over the centuries. But you're
not allowed to equivocate. I mean I heard it on
a podcast once where somebody where two Jews were talking
and one Jew said, well, you know, if we look
at the Holy domore and the other one's like who whoa, whoa, whoa,
But you can't equivocate, that can never be equal to
what we suffered. Well, then I mean I'm out. I
reject at all. I'm just not going to deal with it.
And especially since you know Thomas Massey came out and
said everyone in Congress except me as an APEC babysitter, Well,
does everyone have it? I don't know what India's biggest
lobby group is. Do they all have one? Does I
know that Saudi Arabia has a great lot a great
lobby to Do everyone have a Saudi babysitter? No? So
it's just one this country that's so small that if
they had nothing to do with our government, we may
not even know they existed. I find out about countries
around the world all the time. These little countries where
I'm like, wow, I didn't even know before nine to eleven,
I didn't even know what Cutter was. I didn't know
that was a country. I learned about it because in
nine to eleven I was an ormy I know this stuff.
But all of a sudden, I have to know who
Israel is. And Israel has to be our greatest ally.
This country that is so small that if we if
they weren't had nothing to do with our government, we
may not even know they exist. And apparently these incredibly intelligent,
successful people cannot get by on their own without us,
which makes absolutely no sense. The Switzerland, which is a
very small population, they seem to have done very well
over the years. Sweden, up until Barbara learn respector unleashed
hell on them, was doing very well. And I mean
what they're nine million people. Well, why they didn't need
our aid or and why do these people need our aid?
And if they want our aid, what are we getting
in return? That every one of our politicians has a
babysitter that has to give the prime minister of their country.
I guess I forget is he prime has been prime
minister or president? I don't know or both king or
as the.
Speaker 1: Emperor prime minister. Yeah, there's also a president which has
like ceremonial powerform supposedly.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so if he, you know, when he comes and speaks,
then are our servants have to give him fifty five
standing ovations? Uh? And if I point that out, I'm crazy.
If I point this out, I'm mean. As you said,
I'm I'm hateful because I want I want our politicians
to love and respect the people in North Carolina, Tennessee,
South Carolina, Georgia, the people who are destroyed, whose lives
are destroyed by a storm. I want them to love
them as much as they do. A group of people
that we shouldn't even know, we probably shouldn't even know exist. Yep.
Speaker 1: I am am seven thousand miles away.
Speaker 2: Yep. And that I was done there.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, Yeah, it's uh well, one thing you could
look at you look at all that and said, hmm,
this is this is interesting. It could It could be
that Israel, the Jewish lobby, gets almost exactly everything that
it demands or wants from our Congress or from our
government because the interest of the American people the United
States aligned perfectly with the state of Israel. It could
be that Israeli lobby, yours lobby just exercises an ordinate
power at the expense of the American people. Which is it?
Speaker 2: Oh, all the above, I mean at this point, it's
at this point it's so controlled because all you need, basically,
all you need is five hundred and thirty five Americans.
If you have five hundred and thirty five Americans, you
own America, You control America. Throw in their Secretary of State,
Apartment of Homeland Security, attorney General, all that, and then
a full cabinet and you literally have I mean, we're
essentially Israel.
Speaker 1: They literally obsessed with controlling all five hundred and thirty
five congressman senators because if there's a couple that wander
off the reservation, if you will, uh, they amminately primaried
out right. Where was that guy, Jamal Bowman I think
it was. They spent eight million dollars going after him
and Corey Bush. It's like you couldn't just talk.
Speaker 2: They went after Massy too, and Massy won mass who
was the only one that defeated them. That's why they
hate him so much.
Speaker 1: Well, yes, a lot of these you know, black politicians
are just their proxies there, there's servants and Jewish power.
They don't know it. There are some that do know it,
and they never say that. You know, they will say
the right things. But as you found it, like in Harvard,
all these ad Ie hires ord I hires, like uh
like gay at Harvard Meddly she was canned. She tolerated
protests against Israel on our campus, which you think you
you do in America, right, I mean that's sort of
like a right of passage, sort of a ritual on
campuses have protests, you know, but their gollms got a
lot of control. And then people that go backman and
crack the whip and like that, she's gone. But it's
you know, like you could be that they're just going
too far at this stuff. It's yeah, I think it was.
It's been said that the no Jewish kingdom has ever
lasted more than eighty years, and Israel seems to be
like just not well, just going crazy. You're trying to
pick a fire. I ran and they're fighting in Lebanon
and bea root and they haven't won anywhere. They're just
Chris are being funded by the United States and being
provided with weaponry to do all this stuff. And good
example is that the page your caper, you know, where
a lot of brains had right wingers celebrated, has been clever.
It just did this having a decent se or inhibition.
And it was a dangerous precedent because what you have
is where they went up and they they had this
plan which apparently gives Bake years to install explosive and
like personal devices like pagers and raid and these things.
But the problem as much you do that, it's a
naked act of terrorism. Of course it violates it.
Speaker 2: You know, Tim, don't Tim? Don't you know that they
know exactly what they're doing. I mean, there is no
possible way that innocent people would be hurt by that.
I mean the id F and and Masad, they're the
most moral army on the earth.
Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, but but by the definition, none of the
Lebanese or Pastings are innocent. You see you see how
that works?
Speaker 2: Yeah, they I mean that's well yeah, yeah, that's why
you can you can level an apartment building that's full
of people. And yeah, even if you and what your
initial excuse is going to be, well, you know the
human shields they're they're hiding there and it's not like
Massad's headquarters isn't in the middle a tel Aviv. Yeah,
it's literally in the middle of tel Aviv. They're basically
using they're using a city full of homosexuals and sodomites
as human fields. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, the CIA is in McLean, Virginia. So someone one
of our enemies attacks CIA, which would be considered legitimate
target by any estimation of warfare or any standard warfare,
and they blew up the surrounding residential is in the process. Right,
we'd call that terrorism.
Speaker 2: So we would call that terrorism. But if we if
we fired back on the people who did that, and
we took out a city that none of the people
that none of the people who were responsible for the CIA,
the CIA bombing, that we don't want to happen. And
you know it was all in US. So I was
talking about the uh, the USS Liberty, and it seems
like all you have to do is say that, you know, well,
we we thought that one of our enemies was there,
and you can bomb anything. So I figured the PLO
probably had an office on the USS Liberty, and that's
why they tried to sink in and then shoot the lifeboats.
And you know, kill kill people Americans.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I think I've commented that, you know, with
the whole pager keeper thing. If you can't trust Jews
to sell you a pager or any other electronic device
because it might, you know, explosives might be planted in it,
how can you trust a Jew to run your state department,
or your financial system, or your news or your news agencies,
or your newspapers, your radio stations, or your financial institutions,
because those can be just easily weaponized for the service
Israel too evident they have. That's not a given everything
we've seen, that's that's not an irrational fear or suspicion
because something like that would have been pulled off. I
mean the production or distribution or shipping system had been
corrupted at some point with by Jewish agents probably working
with Jews within those various companies within you with within
that product, within the supply chain. So you begin to say,
you know, I'm not going to trust Jews because Jews,
by by the because of Zionism, they're all suspected saying
them or agents of Israel.
Speaker 2: Well, well, you know, you once you realize that be
root you know is you know one hundred percent Sunni
Muslim and everybody. Oh no, wait a minute, they're only
thirty percent Christian, right, So you know, killing Christians is
perfectly fine, and apparently a lot of American American Christianity,
especially low church Evangelicalism, has no problem with it because
you know, the more Christians that they kill in bea
rout that the quicker Jesus is coming back. So you know, look,
we can I can be globe and flipping about all
this stuff. These people act like. These people act like psychopaths,
not only in their own country it's much worse than
their own country, but here here they basically set it
up so that they can Israel can do whatever they
want because we're not going to say anything about it,
even though it makes us look bad, even though it
makes you know, people into terrorists around the world who
want to hurt us. But that doesn't matter because you
don't blame You don't blame the person who's doing the
persecuting and causing these people to become terrorists. You blame
the terrorist. You know. It's just like when you know,
if somebody has been smoking their entire life and everything,
you can't blame them if they get cancer and die.
You know, it's it's the cancer. It's not like they
did anything to it's not like they did anything to
give them to make themselves sick. Or you know, when
you know, if you have somebody, if your neighbor constantly
keeps shoveling snow onto your yard, or even worse, you know,
if their dog, you know, goes to the bathroom in
their yard and they keep throwing it over their fence,
over over their fence into your yard. You're not expected
if you were to retaliate, that'd be on you. That
would make you look bad even if you went over
there are hundreds. Can you please not do that? And
they were like, oh what, we're not doing anything so well,
I saw you, No you didn't. We're we're always innocent,
just like there, just like their back in the back
in the forties when they're Jewish philosophers were writing and saying,
we can never ever admit that we're wrong, we can
never ever admit that we're guilty of anything. We are
eternally innocent, and the more somebody accuses us of something,
the more innocent we are. I mean, it's incredible to
me that you have a people who and I know
this because I know Jews who've told me that they
were raised to believe that if people found out that
they were Jewish, they would want to kill them. And
they were also raised to believe that they were God's
chosen people and that they were special. Well, to me,
that is the perfect recipe for a narcissism that allows
people to do anything they want to anyone because everybody
wants to kill them. So how how do we how
do we deal with a people like that? And better yet,
why do we let them run our government?
Speaker 1: Well, because we're liberal and you can't generalize, right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, oh, you individualized when it comes to Muslims. Right, Well,
they had to generalize when it comes to Muslims because
Jews told us that Muslims are bad.
Speaker 1: Yeah, people can't compute that it's and it's good. They've
been told these stories the narrative of history, and there's
a direct penalty for it because the very power that
that exists that can destroy people, you can't acknowledge. If
you do, that very power destroys you. And so that's
why you have people who are acting because they're not
dealing with reality. You're not dealing with political reality. When
you're deal when you if you don't acknowledge Jewish power
and its influence in the United States and throughout the West,
and it's nature how it functions, and when you're talking
about politics, you might as well just to be talking
about I don't know, baseball, you know, or entertainment, because
you're not dealing in reality. You know it's an important category.
And if you're not able to acknowledge it and deal
with it, you know there's no progress made because you
can't deal with the biggest political issue that confronts the
United States today, which is a Jewish power in our society.
Doesn't say there aren't other issues, but this is the
biggest issue. We can't deal with the other issues because
of that.
Speaker 2: You know, if you have people who are law I wasn't.
I may not even bring up loyalty. If you have
people who have an out who if everything here turns
to crap and this place becomes unlivable, it's not safe anymore,
they have somewhere to go. If those are the people
running the show and you don't have anywhere to go,
I don't know about you, Tim, but I don't have
anywhere else to go. The United States is basically all
I know and anywhere any other place that I would
think that I would go because well, you know, let's
say my you know, obviously I have ancestors in Spain.
They've destroyed Spain. The ideology has the ideology that they've
pushed throughout Globalhomo has destroyed Spain. I do have German
citizenship through birth because I was born there, sort of
an anchor baby kind of situation. Some of the things
I've said on this podcast can get me arrested in Germany.
Speaker 1: Are you using a dual citizenship to advance German interest
in the United States? Oh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm definitely definitely pushing, you know, so that Germany
could become more like a wait a minute, they're actually
worse than us. They're worse off than we are.
Speaker 1: I had someone say that's me one time. Well there
are other dual citizems. Yeah, but it's completely different. You
realize that. You see, if you're doing all the difference
of Israeli dual citizenship and its influence and its meaning
as opposed to someone being Polish and America, you know,
Polish and Mexican or US citizenship, and you're not dealing
in reality and you're nor you're dealing in good faith,
and so there's no point you're having a discussion with
you because you're not dealing with reality, you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And that's one of the biggest problems is you
can say I can sit here all day and say,
you know, the average American doesn't understand the leak theory
that it's always going to be elites that run things.
I mean, if they're Anglo elites, if they're wasp Bill eats,
if they're you know, heritage American elites. Well, I mean
that makes sense, right, and that's how who founded this country.
But I mean when you have people who came pouring
into the country one hundred years after it was founded
and after we had you know, the worst thing that
ever happened in this country, you know, are our War
of Northern Aggression commonly known as the Civil War, and
the country has weakened in the countries at a place
where it's trying to figure out it's transitioning into something new,
and you have these people who come in who are
thirsting for power, who are thirsting because they haven't been
allowed to have real power. They've had the ear of
power for centuries in other places. But they just found
this liberal paradise where anyone can have power. All they
got to do is run for office. All they got
to do is have money. All they gotta do is influence,
and they have international money. Well what have the last
what had that last one hundred and fifty years looked like?
How many Americans have been lost to wars fought for
these people in World War One and World War two?
Or America would not have gotten into World War One
if it wasn't for the Rothchilds telling Lord Balfour that
they could get the Americans into the war if you
just give us Palestine. Take you know, let's take Palestine. Okay.
World War two. The focus group in Britain pushing Churchill
to declare war on Germany. Okay, the terror wars. Wesley
Clark sitting there, Well, we got to do these seven countries,
you know in Wesley Clark, you know, nice nice Anglo
name whose dad is a rabbi.
Speaker 1: Okay, Malan Albright.
Speaker 2: I mean, what am I? Well, I'm not supposed to
notice this, And if I notice this, I'm a bad
person because of it. I should have you know, I
should have my banking taken away. I should basically be depersoned.
You know, they punch, you know, anyone should be able
to hurt me now because I'm quote unquote a Nazi. No,
this is this is the reality of the situation we're in.
And if you refuse to see it, and if you
get mad when someone points it out to you, what
you're as far as I'm concerned, you're on their side.
They said when they founded this country that we were
gonna have enemies foreign and domestic. No one wants to
talk about the domestic enemy. I mean we did at
one point in the nineteen fifties had a bunch of
show trials executed a couple I mean, were the Rosenberg's guilty.
Speaker 1: Well, even McCarthy was going after communists, but in communism
as a subset of Jewish revolutionary spirit, so he didn't quite
exactly know what he was. He was identifying something and
then he was destroyed. You had the Reese Committee hearings
in the Great Foundations. Wasn't explicitly Jewish, but it was
acknowledging you had an entity that was acting against the
interest of the American people, but that was shut down.
So they were acknowledging domestic enemies they're undermining the American
way of life. That was it's commission, if you will,
and they were so. Yeah, there was an acknowledgement that
that a society it's liberal, should always keep its you know,
radar up for this or he must be vigil in.
Internal vigilance is the price of liberty. It's our rhetoric.
And that means that society that the liberals reports to
be free is going to be very vulnerable to infiltration,
as indeed American United States has.
Speaker 2: You know, yeah, and America has was open in the
eighteen hundreds too.
Speaker 1: By the way, all that all that fifties fifties anti
communism stuff, the origins of that were the brown Scares,
anti fascist. Right. It turns out the guy who first
started at was a communist spy. And your congressman, the.
Speaker 2: Imagine McCarthy, I mean, growing up in North Dakota. I mean,
how many Jews do you think he knew growing up
in North Dakota. And then he you know, I know,
maybe he listened to Father Coughlin, maybe he read you know,
The Dearborn Independent or something like that, and he's like, huh,
well that doesn't make sense. I mean, I live in
North Dakota.
Speaker 1: Well, who shut down Father Cocklant. Who's ad L? Yeah,
who who orchestrated the tradition trials of nineteen forty four?
There was the ADL working with the FBI.
Speaker 2: Now had a who had a communist working in his
white house, who had several communists working in his white house,
but who had a communist working side by side with
him in his white house FDR.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they just they swarmed Washington to see with the
expansion of the New Deal, all those alphabet sooop agencies.
That was the big moment, the same way that the
expansion of the university system in the post war period
provided you know, the Frankfurt School and the cultural Marxist
the Jews to infiltrate academia, which takes to Christopher Rufo,
which you did a you get a couple of shows
on Christoph Ruver recently, which is related to this, because
Christal Rufo was the guy at the Manhattans to Who's
I guess the sugar daddy is Paul Singer, but he's
gone after Like plagiarists, you know, black plagiaris, you know,
academic fraud, liberal academics, a lot of them are they
all end up being black for some reason. But he
also went after diversity. I guess in the Act on
October seventh he was given free rando go after diversity,
equity and inclusion. But it turns out that his motivations. Well,
let's you talk about Chris Rufo, because she did a
couple of shows addressing him, and what's his motivation? He
did a couple He had a slam piece against the
right and this guy Chris Brenet, which might be a
response to his piece he wrote about the Charlemagne Pennsylvania
town and he might have gotten into trouble because he
identified who in that article and he he might have
gotten into trouble. But do you want to talk about that?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean Chris Ruffo has become famous for like
New the New College down in Tampa, helping to get
DEI taken out of a couple of universities. And you
know he's a hero to the quote unquote right, and
he helped with the whole thing. What's his name, Bill Ackman.
What a piece of work that guys who you know
needed to get Claudie Gay taken out of Harvard. So
you know, what what do they do? Oh? You know,
Claudiine Gay is not controlling speech on her campus. Now.
When it was when it was twenty twenty and it
was BLM and they were attacking white people, heritage Americans,
it was fine. No one, no one with any No
billionaires were going on the college campuses and saying that
we needed to crack down. No billionaires were hiring Pinkerton's
to go into Kenosha, Wisconsin, or to go into Minneapolis
to stop, to put these people down and to stop
them from doing these things. No, it only happened when
after October seventh and these college students started protesting Zionist behavior,
the Zionist state, and that is I would assume that
is anathematic them because one they're Zionists and two, once
you start looking into Zionism, you start realizing, well what
are Zionists? And then people start asking questions about Jewish
power and international jewelry.
Speaker 1: One thing it stays clear is there is no sunshine
between Zionism and Judaism.
Speaker 2: No, no, not at all.
Speaker 1: They used to make they used to try to make
that distinction.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. So now it's like, so you have someone
like you have someone like Rufo, who does you know
what was did some fairly good work, but once you
go back and you examine it, it's very it's very targeted,
targeting certain people, and it's targeting a certain group of
people who started to notice Zionists. And so I read
on my sub stack a couple of weeks ago an
article he wrote, he and a co author wrote about
Charlotte May, Charlote Roy, Pennsylvania, and he basically talked about
how there was a company, the Frozen Food Company in
the town and they had basically stopped hiring white people.
Haitians had been moved into the town. They were hiring Haitians.
Haitians were all these things, and he in the article
calls out the Jewish Family and Children's Services as the
organization that is in there every week bringing these people in,
making sure they get situated. And he also mentions that
their parent company is high at Hebrew in Grenade Society.
And I read it. I read that on my substack
one because you know, I'm very interested in this whole
Haitian thing because I lived in South Florida and I
lived around Haitians, and Haitians are not Americans. They're never
going to be Americans. There as far as I'm front of,
Like Springfield, Ohio is now just a Haitian town. It
will never be another, it will never be an American
town again unless you expel all of them. I'm very
interested in this, so I'm reading it. I was surprised
to see that he called out a Jewish NGOs non
gentile organizations, and well what happens after that? He somebody
who had helped him, a guy named Chris Brune Brunette,
I don't know how to pronounce his name, who I
guess had helped him with the Claudine Gay scandal and
had helped him find how Claudine Gay had plagiarized a
whole bunch of stuff. While apparently Chris Brene had started
asking questions about Zionism and about the state of Israel.
So Chris Rufo very publicly said that I cannot have
anything to do with this guy anymore. He is not
associated with me anymore, cutting all ties. And I've always
been one who said, if people on the right don't
want to talk about Jewish power, and I think they
do good work, I'm going to leave them alone. As
leave them alone as long as they don't counter signal,
as long as they don't start going after people who
start talking about Jewish power or promoting Jewish causes. So
I had left Rufou alone, and as soon as I
saw him do this, it was, you know, I was like, Okay,
I think we know where this guy stands. If you
look a little deeper, you find the Paul Singer, You
find the Paul Singer connection bill a Men, not directly,
but you know, in there. And then he wrote an
article for Compact, which is a website I didn't even
I had heard of it, but I really didn't know
anything about it started in twenty twenty two, and he
basically went through every like anti Semitic trope. He you know,
and this is also a guy who married a you know,
then I'll talk about the fact that he married an
illegal alien from an Asian country. So obviously I don't
think the borders are a big concern for him. So
he writes this article where he just basically starts tearing
apart and using every trope that everyone who ever talks
and accuses people of being anti semis uses. Oh, they're
just blaming everybody for their failures. And what does this
lead to? George Washington and said this about Jewish people, YadA, YadA,
and I just realized that well, maybe, just maybe, after
he wrote that article about Charlottla Pennsylvania, he got what
they what they term what they call the call is said,
now he needs to start actively counter signaling anybody who
talks about Zionism. And you know, the the cherry, the
cherry on top is the fact that just a day
or the same day that article came out. It is
either later in the day or the next day. An
expos day I think, came out in Vanity Fair which
showed that Compact was one of the initial investors and
it was George Soros. And we know George Soros's background,
where his loyalties lie. And you know, it just more
and more, or when you start looking on the American right,
you start to understand that there are a lot of
the people who are there who are allowed to have
make seven figure salaries, put up on pedestals, meet with
politicians and have politicians and you know, governors stand next
to them and go, he's doing great work and everything.
You start to realize that these people are working for
Jewish power. And I'm you know, as I said on
the Old Glory Club, livestream last night is then you
look at what is termed, which is a terrible term,
the dissonent right online, and you find out that a
lot of times you have some of noons there and
it comes out that the reason, maybe one of the
reasons they're anonymous is because a lot of them, when
they get docked, end up being Jewish. Oh, I'm you
have to ask the question is how deep and how
buried does this go? And how long does this last?
And how do you how are we going to sit
here and allow people to use the term right wing
who are making excuses for a country that is just
basically declared a race war on everyone around them, and
they're exterminating them. I mean, the Gossam might as well
be the Eastern Front now because they're just.
Speaker 1: Tell you declare the measurement and now you clared you
into be anti semitic. France is anti semitic because of
some of the complaints are I guess criticisms coming out
of the Macron's government. Uh, and when it criticizes them
just anti semitic. It's just uh, it's again, it's outrageous,
but it's interesting. In the Crystal Rufo, the piece he
wrote on the town of Pennsylvania, which was a fairly
good piece exposing you know, how this how how this
is happening, the network of NGOs working with these various
companies that are profiting off cheap labor and of course
loading the bill off on the taxpayer, the buying properties,
creating essence company towns, displacing heritage Americans, the Native Americans
that are there. Uh And you know it's it's a racket.
And of course it's working in coots with with the
US government. Iana Moorcus, who was a former board member
of Highest. He didn't mention that in the article, of course,
but the Highest does come up and those in the
know know that Ileana Moorcus, who is presided over the
collapse of the US border. It's not a uh, that's
not a you know again, it's not a bug. It's
a feature of the system that we're witnessing. Uh So.
But then he he does name, he does name the
Jewish organizations involved in this. Then he does his follow
up piece. In the follow up piece and for Compact
is interesting where he one thing he he condemns identity politics,
but the criticism of Zionism, which is probably the I
think the most glaring example of identity politics is verboten
Zion is my identity politics. I think it's you know,
it's the best example of identity politics.
Speaker 2: You know, Well, you have a writer return in Israel,
and it's interesting. In order to take advantage of that,
you basically have to take a blood test. Then you
have to prove I forget what you have to prove.
Speaker 1: In Spain, it was evil, didn't it when the Spaniards
did that with the edge.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that was kind of Yeah, it was
evil because they weren't doing it and they were the
victims of it. But the you know when you look
at that, and then you'll have someone jump in and go, oh,
do you know that there's like eight people out of
one hundred and twenty in the Knesse who are Arabs,
Like there's shop dispoys everywhere.
Speaker 1: I love that. Well, there's eight Arabs in the Cansse. Yeah,
because of the electoral system, it's a permanent minority. That's
great democracy. I like that. Two sheeps in the Lamb
decison what they have for lunch as they say.
Speaker 2: Yeah, don't you see how don't you see that we've
we've been trying to live side by side with the
Muslims slaughter to take over this land for you know,
seventy six years, and they just they just keep trying
to kill us.
Speaker 1: Well, you've seen pictures of Gaza. The places a hell hole.
Look what they make of it.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you use the word genocide or open
air prison, you can't be or you know, open air
concentration camp, you can't be taken. Seriously, people can leave
if they want to. You know, I have a friend
who is Lebanese and they have a house there, and
he's American, you know, he lives here. But they have
a house in Lebanon and they have a business, and
they can't they can't go. Why why aren't they allowed to?
Why can't they go there without thinking they're going to
get killed? And you know as soon as they step
you know, this person that I've met, you know that
I've met in real life and pressed flesh with, if
he steps onto that soil, even on this soil here,
I would assume he is considered okay to kill along
with all of his family because he's probably harboring terrorists.
He's a Coptic Christian mm hmm. So it's Okay, so
what well, what what do we Okay, So if he
goes home to if he well he considers here home.
If he goes back there to his business and you know,
stays at the home that he has there, if he
gets killed, well he's he probably had what he was
hiding arms for Hesbola under his under his house. Is
that is that what happened? Do people not understand how
insane this is? It makes no You have to suspend
all logic and common sense in order to buy into
the Zionist narrative.
Speaker 1: Well, I talked to like defenders of Israel, conservatives, right wingers,
even in my family, and they'll say, they'll pull pooh,
and I say, and estimated forty two thousand to one
hundred and eighty thousand have been killed? Were they all
Hamas fighters? Obviously not sold? They dispute numbers. So you're
disputing the fact that israel Is is pummeling God with
bombs and destroyed eighty percent of the buildings there. You're
not disputing that, Okay, So then you have to admit
within but by necessity, tens of thousands of people would
have had to have been killed because it's you're dealing
with a city some of those densely populated cities or
areas in the world. So which is it? So, you know,
just like the pager, you say it's thet gloat or
they say that's really clever. Well that's terrorism. I that's
text for case terrorism. So then it's terrorism. Well no
it isn't, Well, yes it is. That's having devices explode randomly,
you know, not knowing who's going to be next to
it or holding it. That's terrorism. And it's designed to
inflict not only disruption, but terror in that community. Then
then they're not to mention what they've done to Syria
using you know, it's your hottest you know, uh isis
for to destabilize the Assad government. They've turned that, you know,
that country upside down for the past twelve years. That's terrorism.
But then people don't think of you again that they
don't think assistently. They don't. They have a short term memory,
they don't, they don't kind of look happened to Libya,
you know, look at NATO and the Israelis did a
Libya to unseekfe you know, and then you know they're
more than likely to assist these people to Mike to
to refugees to to to go to Europe in the
United States.
Speaker 2: You know, it's like, you know, well, that's the goal.
They openly say that that's their goal, is that they
want to they want to send them to Europe. I mean,
they they want to destroy Europe. They cannot have any
white countries. You can't have an all white country because
they can't hide in an all white country.
Speaker 1: Yeah, George Sarah said that as much. That's why he
supports Mike. But he says minorities and refugees to uh uh,
to create a societies that are full of minorities so
there's no majority to oppress his people, the Jews. That's
how that's the solidism is just amazing. The so the
liberties they take other people's societies and countries, you know.
Speaker 2: And then they and then they get you know, good.
They pay seven figure salaries to people like Chris Rufo
to defend this all.
Speaker 1: You made a point, right when you're talking the article
you talk about Chris Rufo is talking about the success
of the Jews in various institutions financial, particularly academia. But
you made it, you know the point I'm talking about.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I made the point is they go to make it. Yeah,
Chris Rufo has made a career out of fighting academia,
fighting dee I, critical race theory, and where did all
these things come from? And then he says, you know.
And then in the same article he says, you Jews
have had so much success in academia, the one thing
that he's made a career out of. Okay, so yeah,
he can't put he can't put two and two together.
Speaker 1: He's saying, Jews are very successful in academia. Academia is corrupt.
So aren't the Jews at fault?
Speaker 2: Well no, obviously not, because you have to You can't
look at them as a group. You can only look
at them as a group when they do something right.
Sandy Cofax, Sandy Kofax was a he was he was
a treasurer. He was he was somebody that the Jews
could be proud of. But when someone when a Jew
does something wrong, when you know, when you have you
Goda in Russia and you point out that he's probably
responsible for the death of ten million Christians, maybe twenty million,
as much as twenty million, well he has to be
he has to be judge as an individual. Then it
has no you can't bring up the fact that like
forty percent of the cheka in a country of four
percent Jews was Jewish and the CHECKO was responsible basically
for killing people. Okay, well, I mean, am I supposed
to am I supposed to judge each one of those
forty percent as individuals. But if they you know, if
you know Sandy Kofax throws, you know, wins three games
in the World Series, he is a benefit and you know,
a treasure. It's all Jews everywhere. I'm okay, how do
we so you get to do what you've been basically
doing in finance for a very long time, is you
get to privatize the privatize the wins and the profits,
and then socialize the losses. This I've seen this over
and over again.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, what I'm saying the cofacts were to take
his World Series winnings and his celebrity status to start
promoting abortion, homosexuality, to generousy in these things that destroy society.
Then he becomes a legitimate target for criticism, and then
you might want a question the status you gave him,
because he's exploring that status to destroy society, same way
that David Rubinstein uses the billions he's earned with the
carlier group through the various Jewish wars that the US
has fought over the years. Then he turns that his
treasure to buy up like Mathaicello and buy up the
country's patrimony and turn to Manticello into hate Whitey Museum.
You know, then that's a legitimate that we have a problem,
don't we.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean not for well, we have a
problem for sure, because there's not the we can do
about it.
Speaker 1: And I don't think it's a controversial statement. They spread
around themselves.
Speaker 2: They wrote a book about it.
Speaker 1: Most people admit that the Jews have shaped American identity
through Hollywood, through the lens, through the lens of of
the of the of the camera, the silver screen. Has
that been a good influence? Those people would say probably not.
Speaker 2: I think a lot of people would definitely say that,
especially today.
Speaker 1: So then, but those Jews are then criticisms have warranted
of those Jews.
Speaker 2: And but you're only allowed to judge them as individuals.
I mean, Harvey Weinstein is just an individual.
Speaker 1: Well, the same of that communism reflects the Jewish of
reflection or a product of Jewish revolutionary spirit, the suverse
the moral subversion and entertainment and music in Hollywood is
also a product or a sub a, basically a category
or a result of the Jewish revolutionarized spirit. So you're
dealing with the Jewish character, cosmology, or outlook, which is
a problem to the Christian West, traditional West. Is there
something in the West that we should preserve? Do you say?
In the Traditional West, it's it's Christian heritage, it's influences, culture,
it's ethics, it's morality. If you find anything beneficial in
those things and it's being assaulted by these people, then
those people have to be identified collectively and dealt with collectively.
Otherwise you lose, as as we've been losing because you
can't identify them collectively because that makes you makes you
a Nazi.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know, but I do think it's getting
I do think more and more people are talking about
this now. Yeah. I don't know about you, but after
October seventh, I had a lot of people who had
stopped listening to my show He Goes. You know, they
do were just like, I can't listen to you would
talk about this group anymore. And then October seventh I
got contact with people are contacted by people like you.
It's I was wrong. I need to start listening again.
And well, why is that he goes it's becoming so obvious,
and that is something that that's why you have you know,
Chris rufo is ordered to write an article like that,
if he even wrote that article, I mean that that
could have been penned by that could have been penned
by anyone, and just have his name put on it.
Why he goes to destroy somebody like Chris Brune who
was not even an American, He's a Canadian. I mean,
that's that has its own problems. We'll talk about the
CEQ one day. But the I like my Canadian friends.
You know, everyone knows I love my Canadian listeners.
Speaker 1: Heay is William Shatner or you're a Canadian?
Speaker 2: I mean I would have to answer that in one way.
I mean there, you know, it's it always seems like,
you know, you saw it on Twitter. After October seventh,
you had a bunch of quote unquote right wing influencers
who we knew, we all knew were Jewish. They rarely
ever talked about their Judaism unless somebody brought it up
or something like that. But they always made it seem
like there was nothing. You know, that's just say I
was born, you know, it's my family. And October seventh,
we it got revealed. I mean, look at someone like
Gad Sad Gad said, who was like, you know, on podcasts,
right wing podcast libertarian podcasts, talking about how, you know,
liberalism and if we just have enough freedom and freedom
of speech to say whatever we want, man, we can Yeah,
we can change the world. You know, we can have
such a great society. And then you know, you find
out that he worked from Massade at one point. If
anybody ever stops working for Massade. Yeah, and you had
someone like Dave Rubin who was a homosexual and you
know traffics, you know, traffics children, you know, had two
children traffic to them, and he's losing his mind and
blocking people who were talking about this. And then of
course Ben Shapiro, who we were all aware was his Zionist,
just basically calling for outright Rossen.
Speaker 1: Creek nuclear weapons or something. Yeah, I mean where completely
where are the weapons be? The ploy? Yeah, now much
real estate there?
Speaker 2: They want American troops to go and fight side by
side with them, Why, well, what would that even look
like and why would they be why would they be fight?
What would be the purpose, what would be the threat
to us?
Speaker 1: Well, if Marria just wanted to go a fight for
Israel side by side, and they were to die in
the battlefield, if they get buried there, would they allow
crosses to be shown on the cemeteries there?
Speaker 2: Absolutely not. They're they're tearing one down right now. So
we have twenty We found out recently that there are
twenty thousand quote unquote Americans serving in the IDF right now.
They went to Israel to volunteer for the IDF after
October seventh, and a couple a couple congress people tried
to pass or trying to pass a bill that we
would pay their benefits.
Speaker 1: Well, I think we've given Israel thirty billion dollars since
October seventh.
Speaker 2: That's only ten times more than we give them a year.
Speaker 1: Anyway, So we're probably paying the benefits anyway. So I mean, wow,
you know, it's uh, it's already happened.
Speaker 2: Imagine. I mean, I mean, could you imagine all those guys.
You know, there were a bunch of guys I actually
knew a couple of guys who went and like joined
the French Foreign Legion at one point. Can you imagine
joining the French Foreign Legion and going to Africa? And
and then it's like, oh, well, you know, we think
the we think the US government should be paying paying
their salaries and covering their benefits. Like you're out of
your mind.
Speaker 1: We're Sel Natilson. I think it was a World War
Two veteran who said he wished he had bought for
the IDF and not the US Army. Of course, the
important thing there is Sel Nadilson was a multi billionaire,
made money off of ice gambling, and he he pretty
much was the money bags for the you know, the
financier for the Republican Party.
Speaker 2: That matters. Had a newspaper in Israel, a daily that
was free.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: What are the implications? I remember when I heard that,
it was just like my mind just went insane. It's like,
why would an American Jew have a newspaper in Israel
a daily that's free?
Speaker 1: Well, how about like Christia River writes a conspiracy that
Jews are organized, Well they do. What's the world Jewish Congress?
What's the a d L, what's been a breath? What's
what's what's the kanessen. What's the most apack? What's the
what are you talking about? They do meet in the
room and meet talk on the phone. There was an
acronactur recept. There's report that with three or four billionaires,
Jews buildings got together. What was it, I forget like
in a chat room to strategy. Now this wasn't just
the four guys talking politics. These are billionaires who control media,
who control the money, speakers for the for the to
the political parties. So it has real consequence. So these
are Jews meeting. They want to control the spin and
they were I guess the pr for October seventh. So
they're controlling the flow of information with the American people
get the or the information they're given regarding that conflict
over there, which kept a profound effect, of course on
the United States, not just money, but also eventually getting
into a war. And there are they're responding as Jews,
these American Jews who are again they're colluding again together
to fight a foreign war. It's a foreign country. There
was a recent story, I think it was in Illinois,
outside Chicago, someone that hacked into a billboard, electronic billboard
that said death to Israel and f Israel. Apparently it
was near Jewish neighborhood and it was these anti Semitic,
hateful messages. Well, no, they're criticizing a government. Why is
it anti Semitic? Oh, again, there's no sunshine, there's no
difference between Jews and Israel. What does that say about
Jews in our country? Then?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Yeah, And when you look at billionaires colluding, and
they didn't only collude about what was going to be
released in the newspapers. They were colluding about how to
deal with the problem of the campuses.
Speaker 1: They're conspiring against the constitution, enemies of the American people.
They're conspiring against free speech, which the only thing that
defines the United States. Now, that's what is freedom of speech.
And they were conspiring to suppress that.
Speaker 2: And you know, we don't have a like we mentioned
in the beginning, an election in eleven days and which
one I guess the only question that would be on
someone like Miria Madelson's mind is which one of these
two is better for Israel? And she's thrown all our
money in on Donald Trump. And you know, I don't
I have questions about Donald Trump. But one thing I
do know about Donald Trump is he doesn't really like
war at all. He doesn't want he doesn't want to
get the United States into wars. So what is he
what is this gamble with him?
Speaker 1: M hmm.
Speaker 2: I mean there is a chance that he because of
everything he's gone through and all the money he's lost
and everything that he could be bought and paid for.
But I think there are I know for a fact
that there are more than one interest out there who
have given him money and are expecting a return on it.
And the funny thing is is I know that those
are two competing interests. So I think at this point
it's just a matter of who wins and if the cackling,
if the cackling lunatic wins. I mean, we know that
she's not gonna she there's she's not even in charge. No,
she's so who who is her backing? And you know,
people want to say, oh, Biden, Biden is a Biden
hates is Reel. Biden's been in Israel first dres since
nineteen seventy one. Don't give me that. I know what
his I know what his record is. He loves Israel
more than Donald Trump does. I've actually told people. I
think you know, people are like how can you say
Donald Trump doesn't want war and that he's really not
a Zionist when he was the one who moved the
He was the one who said, oh, move the capitol
to Jerusalem and everything. I don't even I think he
just has a lot of Jewish frends and he's like, oh,
I think this will make them happy, and this will
make Israel happy. I don't even know if you asked
him what zion Is was, he could even explain it.
It doesn't seem like the kind of I mean, does
even seem like the kind of person who's read a book.
Speaker 1: No, I don't think you read his own books.
Speaker 2: We know he didn't. We know he didn't write them either. Yeah,
so it's like, I mean, I don't I don't know
which one is better. I have its tendency to believe
it's Trump when it comes to this issue, just because
I know in four years he didn't get us into
a new war and the one that he did try
to stop in Syria, and when he ordered troops troops
would drawn, they just ignored them.
Speaker 1: Mm hm.
Speaker 2: You know, so I know that his Yeah, he has
some intentions, or at least he has his impulses. Are
towards Yeah, let's you know, let let's wind all this
stuff down and you know, let's not get it into
anything unless it's America's interest. But you know, and you
do have to ask a question that you know, what
happened in the last four years, and you know, is
he is he has compromised as any other any other
president at this point. Is he being installed like my
friend Matt Erickson thinks. And if he is being installed,
then you know, what does that mean? Who's you know,
the question is who's installing him?
Speaker 1: Yeah, when you look at these political figures, that's what
faction is backing them and who's interestedly around. Unfortunately, that's
what you have to you have to interpret these things
because there's no tribute to the people. You know, no
one's going to represent the American people at this point.
You know, I don't you haven't had that in a
long time, if ever.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's like, you know, I think that Trump
genuinely likes the American people. I think when he goes
out there and he meets the American people, he is
very I don't see him playing a role. I see
him as being very genuine. But how that translates into
being resident and working in the best interests of the
American people. You have to question whether he knows what
that would be.
Speaker 1: Well, that goes back to what we started. Trump as Hitler, right,
I mean admiring hit there's generals whatever that means. We're
at a situation now, I think a moment of crisis
the United States where unfortunately, if there's every if it's
going to be measures taken to correct the ship of state,
it's going to require sort of a dictatorial approach, but
you're not gonna get anything out of Congress. Of course,
decisions and actions are made at the executive level, and
you're get to probably almost like if only you had
that the dictatorial impulse and the means to do it,
because at this point the system is so corrupt with
the special interests, the oligarchs and these things, that you
can need someone with a mailed fist, you know, this
power of state to crash the so called you know,
these private interests that have taken over the state. You
know someone yeah, you know Blackrock, A Hey, this this
is how it's going to be.
Speaker 2: You know, I've had people, people in the know who
you know a lot more than I do know a
lot more than we do. Say that if basically we
don't see a massive reduction in the size of government,
and he's talking about like mass firings in the you know,
I think the executive has like two point eight million
just the executive branch alone. That needs to be two
two million plus of that needs to go. We're we're
going to have a financial crisis. That's that's going to
be painful for most And I mean, who's who knows
how to do that? I mean, really, the only person
I know who I've ever heard say that that has
to be done and he knows how to do it
is a fake Robins Swane. He's the only person I've
heard say that out loud, yeah, you know, on a
podcast and say, look, we just need to fire all
these people, you know. And Curtis Jarvin said years ago,
just get rid of the State Department. The state departments
could be the State Department right now, should be the
president and three of his advisors on a zoom.
Speaker 1: Call right now that given the nature of the states,
aren't there to be interpreted as an anti Semitic move though.
Speaker 2: Right, yeah, well, I mean, any any reduction in this
government since it's owned by a foreign power is an
attack on that foreign power. And yes it is anti Semitic.
And anyone who would call for that, you know, probably
should be drone striked, and you know their house should
be their house should be leveled because they're probably harboring
Hamas in the basement. Yes, right, it sounds ridiculous, but
these are the freaking excuses they use on their neighbors
to like kill thousands of their neighbors in one in
one fell swoop. I think what did it was? The
Chazz Ambassador Chaz Freeman said on Judgment Politano's show that
the first attack on Bey Route was eighty two thousand
and eighty two thousand pound bombs. That's that's not a
residential neighborhood.
Speaker 1: Who was like Michael Brodsky, he was at the State Department.
He was a diplomat and he advocated like chemical attacking
and entire guy. I was like, this is a diplomat.
He's always he's Jewish, so he's for massacring. You know,
his his adversaries, you know Almlec, which are the Palestinians.
I'm like, this is a diplomat, this is a guy
you'm trying to that's just the honest broker and the
problems over there was like no wonder you know, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: It's yeah. I mean Saddam's an animal when he uses
chemical weapons on the Kurds. But you know, as long
as very, as long as Israel gets to use it,
they just get a pass doing everything. If they decide
that they're going to drop nukes on a neighbor or
something like that, well that's just what it needed to
be done to bring about peace.
Speaker 1: Well, would I be paranoid if I want didn't want
to buy earlier, if I didn't want to buy a
pager from from a Jew because I might have explosives
in it? Is that like an anti Semitic trope?
Speaker 2: Oh? I think that's that could definitely be one of
the new ones.
Speaker 1: Sure wouldn't that be like I imagine maybe years from my.
Speaker 2: Patriot from that guy, I wouldn't buy a patri from
that guy.
Speaker 1: I mean decades from now, are centuries from now, there'd
be something like Jews and pages similar Jews and Wells right,
poisoning Wells.
Speaker 2: That's an anti Semitic trope.
Speaker 1: And it never never even though they tried to do it.
Speaker 2: Jee told me that you told me that.
Speaker 1: They did it world War two. Right after World War two,
like they poisoned bread or something, and they were going
to poison the wells, but the plan was stopped.
Speaker 2: This is after the war, by the way they they
tort They tortured Germans to death. There's a book called
eye for an Eye. I mean, there's so many books
out there that just detail exactly what how they decided
to treat the average German. I mean, when you look
and see how they treated the average German after the war,
is it any why would anybody be surprised about the
way they treat Palestinians or treat you know, you can
make the argument, okay, even if you wanted to say, oh,
I understand the problem they have with the Palestinians. The
Palestinians have actually gone into other countries in the Middle
East and have been kicked out because they always go
in there and cause problems, which is a really good
argument that they're the actual real Jews. They're actually descendans
of the real Jews. But what what about what about Lebanon?
And you have Hesbalah, okay, but most of Lebanon, I
mean a third a third off been honest Christian Oh well,
I mean, why would they want to hurt Christians? I mean,
they don't have the history of that. There's no history
of that, right.
Speaker 1: Sorry, what until the Jewish state was a status, wasn't
uh that area like Christian? Now it's like less than.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I mean And if you do any studies
on the early twentieth century talking about this with the
with the buddy of mine this afternoon, you will see
that in Jerusalem you had Christian churches, you had Muslim mosques, mosques,
and you had synagogues, and none of them locked their doors.
All got along. There were actually bands that played in
bars that had were interfaith bands. Same video, there's actually
video footage that survived to this and definitely you know pictures.
Well everything was gone really good. What happened?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Jabadinski and uh is Y sak Shamir and Minok
and Big and these Jews from the from Poland show.
Speaker 2: But they were they they were just there too. They
were just there to buy land, right, That's what I've
been told. They just went there to buy land. They
didn't go there to set off bombs and start killing people,
did they. Huh? Strange when they did that.
Speaker 1: And if anyone shouldn't try to negotiate peace, they kill them.
It's like it's just like with the palest and negotiators
or or are murdered. Are any diplomats are murdered and
Syrian pro Uh? And then they act as if Iran's
provoking Israel after decades of provocation, stuck's net, murdering their scientists,
bombing their diplomat these things, uh embark. You know, economic
sanction's supposed by the State Department, which is controlled by
the Jews, of course, I mean, yeah, it's it's it's
a bit much.
Speaker 2: At this point, tim Iran is two weeks from getting
a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: Well, they are a signature of the Non Proliferation Treaty
and still hasn't gotten them anywhere. And you know that's
supposed to buy them security and hasn't.
Speaker 2: Is Israel a sign that?
Speaker 1: No, But they're special, you know, they can blow pages
up and that's okay.
Speaker 2: It's how many nukes do they have?
Speaker 1: I guess they say two hundred or something.
Speaker 2: I've heard none. They don't have any where. Do they
get the materials from that?
Speaker 1: That? What American Jews a plan they ever were? I
guess they were charged with enriching material for the United
States and the students that ran it gave some of
the Israel.
Speaker 2: But I mean, if you.
Speaker 1: Don't want to give security the instrue Jew, you're an
anti semi.
Speaker 2: You say this is all Antie Summit sism because you
know American Americans do bad stuff too.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's true, because there are there are gentile spies, right,
so we can't make any distinction. Therefore, for Russian coming
down of the States, we should give him a security
claim because that would be racist.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I just it'd be great at this point if
you just eighty percent of the cabinet was Chinese and
the Secretary of State was Chinese, and the uh, the
Attorney General was Chinese and headed Department Homeland Security was Chinese.
And yeah, that'd be great, wouldn't it. I mean, good
looking to be like, huh, country's falling apart. Oh, can't
you don't want to be racist against Chinese people, do you?
Speaker 1: Well? Like I said, they're you know, they're they're very talented,
they're smarter than most people. Therefore they take over and
you can't criticize them after they take over. It was
Ted Hesberg, who's you know, the ran Notre Dame sordly.
He was actually liberal, but he said, you let the
Jews in, they take over. That's just a reality. You
could call me anti Semitic, you call me bad names
for acknowledging the reality. But that's just the history of
these people and how they operate, how they collectively operate.
And it's a problem.
Speaker 2: You know, it's funny. It's all in the Old Testament too.
It's one story after another.
Speaker 1: And yeah, the New test Jesus, you know, knocking heads
with these you know, these people trying to tell them,
you know, it's yeah, it's again, it's just there's yeah,
unless you can talk about it openly. And there was
a time you could openly talk about it. But that's
when America was racist. That's another thing Christopher in articles
is that, you know, basically the America has has He
invokes the sort of the meritocracy equality, that's all that
civil rights post civil rights jargon. What what has that reaped? What?
What what fruits? You know? Can we have been harvested
from that system? You know, it's h We're no longer
a meritocracy because you can't have a quality under a
meritocracy because people aren't equal.
Speaker 2: Of course, but yeah, I mean Rufo in that article
he references in the first in the first paragraph, he says,
you know, we want to go back to it's time
when America was color blind. And basically, once he returns
to the nineteen nineties.
Speaker 1: Oh that that, oh the nineties.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the blessed nineties. He is a I think I
called him a he's a Civil Rights Act American. He
he was on Aron McIntyre's podcast about a year ago
and or impressed him on that and he said, no,
he's we need to get rid of this. We need
to get rid of that. We need to get rid
of this because we need to get rid of DEI
and all and critical race theory because it gives it
gives people who are undeserving ay a place over people
who are deserving. And Or mentioned the Civil Rights Act,
and you know what Rufo did. Rufo invoked some far
leftist I had never heard of before who was against
the Civil Rights Act, basically saying, if you're against the
Civil Rights Act, you're a far leftist. And this is
exactly what they've been saying since October seventh, because the
people who the people who they've targeted for protesting have
been it would historically you would see them on the left.
College students got to everyone. So now the new thing
is is that if you're an anti Zionist or if
you recognize Jewish power, you're playing identity politics, which Zionism
definitely is not identity politics. And you're on the left.
Speaker 1: It isn't all politics.
Speaker 2: Identity, by the way, all politics, idol, I was.
Speaker 1: I guess because the way I did, what identity you have?
But uh yeah, identity, Yeah I get that too. Uh
oh yeah, you you agree with uh Corey Bush and
the squad. If the squad comes out and says the
sky is blue, I'm not going to disagree with them.
I'm not.
Speaker 2: No, it's like they're broken Most people are broken clocks.
If you don't agree with them. There there's two things
a day where you're gonna be like that makes sense,
you know, like.
Speaker 1: Some Muslim representative from from from Michigan, he's gonna have
problems with yours foreign policy and well, you know, she
could be a liberal Democrat and a lot of things,
I don't grow wortching a lot of other things, and
she's with the Jews on those things. But it comes
to the Middle East. She's you know, she's right. I'm
not going to disagree with this because I disagree with
other aspects of her politics. I mean, that's just irrational.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I mean it's just it's just a for
for somebody, for a group that would say that dialectics,
you know, like left right, Hegelian dialectics or something is
so wrong, and they would denounce it and everything. Their
arguments are all dialectics. It's all. You're either on the
right or the left. If you if you want to
get rid of the Civil Rights Act, you're either on
the right left. I mean, the fact that he would
invoke somebody who's far left when the list of people
on the right who have spoken out against the Civil
Rights Act is married, it just goes to show exactly
how how much of a snake he is.
Speaker 1: Can I agree with Sam and Francis on that?
Speaker 2: Do I have to?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Sam Francis, Sam Francis, you know, he he has some things.
He noticed Jewish power, so he had to be destroyed,
you know. And and another thing that he mentions in
that article is he says that it's too bad that
these people on the on this on this side of
the quote unquote right, don't have gate keepers. Yeah, well
that's what you're that's what you're there for. That's what
you're there for. You're there to reach out to the
left and punch right, you know, the you punch left
when you absolutely have to. But I mean, let's face it,
these classical liberals are leftists. People want to talk about
classical liberalism and liberalism like it's on the right or
something like that. It's all leftism. You know, there's a
certain level of egalitarianism in there. They'll say, oh, we
can't guarantee the you can't guarantee equality of outcome, but
we can guarantee equality of opportunity. Really, how are you
going to do that? How is somebody who is born
somebody with an eighty five IQ and someone with one
hundred and fifty five IQ gonna have equality of opportunity?
Speaker 1: Yeah, you can't guarantee that. How do you navigate that?
And the complexity of you, you know, of society, individual
lives and who they have as parents, the friends they make,
and the natural abilities they're given. You just can't. You
can't engineer that.
Speaker 2: And even somebody like what's his name, the black former Marxist,
the one that the right loves to quote Thomas Solah
even he even he calls that out. He's like, you
canna have twins, and they're not going to have the equality,
have equality of opportunity because they're different. And then he
says something really funny where he goes, I'm gonna not
even the same I'm not even the same as myself
on different days. So it's like, how do you how
do you guarantee that? And that seems what classical liberals will,
they'll spout, I mean, classical liberalism is all that is.
It's just a a way to try to hide behind
the fact that you're a leftist liberal.
Speaker 1: It's also false advocating. You create, you create disappointment because
you're creating a false promise because you're not going to
get the equality. You're never gonna get the equality that
that the system supposedly it's just to guarantee. So you're
gonna always have some if that's your expectation. You always
have some basis with some grievance with some group, you know,
like the idea that uh, outside discrimination or some government action,
you know, uh, blacks should be equal to whites. You know,
if you want to simplifiz this to whites are very
complex too. You break down whites and Chris, not all whites.
Whites are very different. Uh, there's a lot of the
diversity within what we call white people. But I'm saying
the idea that there is a lot of a lot
of other things going on there, you know, like, uh,
groups aren't gonna have you know, temperaments or attitudes that's
going to affect outcomes and and the whole narrative the
civil rights movement is that basically blacks are poor and
they achieve less because of oppression. I suppose maybe something
uh interior to their own to their own character, you know,
their own problems, you know nature. It creates an entitlement mentality,
which basically it's a low, great hatred of the white majority,
which then is exploited by the Jews because they've been
they've been indoctrinated to sort of resent uh you know
the white majority. Yeah, you know, the white spit engineered
to feel guilty. You know. So it's a bad combination.
Doesn't end well.
Speaker 2: And as your co host Joe Attwell and I spoke
about on my show when talking about the authoritarian personality,
it's been a seventy five year attack on everything that
white people, all the benefits of white culture, family, religion.
Speaker 1: Because that creates a cohesive, broadly homogeneous health and society,
which the Jews find it to be a threat. Basically,
everyone's a germinating Hitler if they grow up with a
respect for authority family, So they have to smash hierarchy,
undermine particularly the you know, the father figure. Everyone needs
been erotic, sex obsessed, a addicted correct and that way
there is they're not threats to the to the Jewish minority.
And that's openly stated in the authority and personality.
Speaker 2: And people will look. Yeah, people will look at that
book and they go, oh, well, it's just a book,
you know, it's not. It's a book that was commissioned
by the American Jewish Committee and for three of the
four authors or Jews. And there are three of the
four and four of the authors are part of the
Frankfurt School. So okay, well, okay, so it's just a book.
All right, did any of did any of their recommendations
actually happen? Did they materialize?
Speaker 1: Pretty much all of them? Is it, Mike Jump? Just
a book?
Speaker 2: Well? Yeah, great, not a great book, but just a book.
It was a good election year screed.
Speaker 1: But Homer's manifested just a book.
Speaker 2: Yeah, books, books have ideas, and you know, people use them,
and they use them to shape their their worldview and
especially if any of those can be used to gain hold,
gain and hold power. And I'm in order to gain
and hold power, you needs to be able to manipulate people.
Speaker 1: Normal normally is just a TV producer.
Speaker 2: Sure are you see is just a movie producer.
Speaker 1: It's you know, it's just just entertainment, doesn't Yeah, there's
no influence on people.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, no one. No one's ever watched a
movie and uh no, no one ever watched a Pretty
Woman and decide. No woman ever watched Pretty Woman and decided,
I'm at the end of my room. Maybe I'll become
a prostitute and not meet some rich guy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, Seinfeld had no culture influence on American society, right, people,
didn't you know every Friday it was on Thursday night,
yet must see Thursday so every Friday morning around the
water cool I had no effect on American society its
values as outlook, it's you know, there was a show
about nothing. Of course, the show about nothing is something,
isn't it.
Speaker 2: Right? I mean a lot of messages there or friends.
I mean you look at the show Friends. What is
the show Friends about? Oh? I mean be single, be
in the big city, be completely derastinated from your culture,
your family, everyone, and you know when they come to visit,
they're just rubes. And you know you're you'd be better
off in the big city, you know, watching watching naked people,
you know across the street in other buildings.
Speaker 1: Yes, and women can be out of whores and be
totally happy, m because on TV that's the way it is.
And that is no effect on how young women behave
you see today, right, there's no effect that women behave.
Speaker 2: You're not allowed to notice these things.
Speaker 1: Tim call her Daddy podcast the top podcast in the
country that does no effect that women behave. It's yeah, Well, Pete,
I think I said ahead of you for an hour.
Speaker 2: Well, with some technical issues we went a little bit over.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much so. People follow your work.
Speaker 2: Peek a show right, pekinya show, Pete, substack dot com
and old glory Clove dot com. Check me out. Check
out the first two that's me and check out the
third one Old Glory Club dot com. That's me and
some friends of mine who were got a little movement
going around the country, and people are people are really
enjoying what we're doing. So check that out.
Speaker 1: Get together and talk little trees then huh.
Speaker 2: It's it's so funny whenever we get whenever we get together,
and so we just we always think we're going to
talk about something important and then it just turns into
like social hour, which is really good. Which is really
good because we know you don't need to be talking
about this stuff all the time.
Speaker 1: No, definitely, no balances balance in life.
Speaker 2: That's why family is important. Even family you don't agree with.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I land best my siblings all the time
and I go to you know, over their houses and
watch a football game and yeah, there's there's no hard feelings. Yeah,
now you should that's my brothers. By the way, It's
different when it comes to win.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, family. You know, family, you're you're stuck with them.
There's no reason you should be unless you know they initiated.
There's no reason you should be moving to separate from
them unless they are doing something absolutely hainous or hurting people.
But but yeah, friends, friends, you have a little more
leeway there that's true.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, because family don't have a choice, do.
Speaker 2: We see you're stuck with them.
Speaker 1: Listen. Thanks so much, Pete.
Speaker 2: I appreciate you. Tim, thank you very much, thank you.
Good Night byeye, good night bye,