Speaker 1: Hey. Before we get started, be sure to head over
Speaker 1: to ham Radio two dot com forward slash email dash
Speaker 1: sign up to join my email list of over nineteen
Speaker 1: thousand subscribers, where I like to send emails about upcoming events,
Speaker 1: upcoming shopping deals, keep you updated with all the stuff
Speaker 1: going on with my videos. Once that list reaches twenty thousand,
Speaker 1: I will be doing a giveaway of another HF radio
Speaker 1: sign up today and thank you for the support. The
Speaker 1: public notice from the Department of Governmental Efficiency DOGE and
Speaker 1: this FCC document entitled Delete Delete Delete. It is document
Speaker 1: number twenty five DASH one three three. What are my thoughts?
Speaker 1: There's beend several videos on this subject, and I've commented
Speaker 1: on a few of those videos. I wanted to give
Speaker 1: you my thoughts on what I think about this whole
Speaker 1: thing and where we're going to see it go. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of speculation, a lot of stuff that the
Speaker 1: document doesn't talk about, so but I wanted to address
Speaker 1: it head on because I'm getting a lot of questions.
Speaker 1: So here's what I think. Today's video is sponsored by
Speaker 1: spe Expert Amplifiers check out their website. Mtcradio dot com
Speaker 1: from Main Trading Company in the USA. Okay, So the
Speaker 1: document that started all of these, and I've seen two,
Speaker 1: maybe three videos from different YouTube channels specifically about this
Speaker 1: document and how it may or may not affect amateur
Speaker 1: radio license. This is a public notice. It was released
Speaker 1: in March twelfth of twenty twenty five, so less than
Speaker 1: a week ago at the time of this recording. It's
Speaker 1: titled reason in Reason Delete Delete Delete. Okay. Now, I
Speaker 1: must say this, as a general rule, I am all
Speaker 1: for smaller government, less government intrusion and personal lives, and
Speaker 1: just less government power. In a general sense, talking very
Speaker 1: high level here, I am not in favor of abolishing
Speaker 1: the FCC completely, and I'm not in favor of just
Speaker 1: free banding every radio frequency spectrum out there. So I'm
Speaker 1: going to get into that. I'm gonna explain a little
Speaker 1: bit what I mean by that. But I wanted to
Speaker 1: kind of start here where this document started. And this
Speaker 1: is a pretty long document. You guys have probably read
Speaker 1: this already, and if you haven't, I will link it
Speaker 1: in the description. Blow. Okay, there's a lot of different
Speaker 1: things in here mentioned. One thing I will say first
Speaker 1: off is that nowhere in this document is amateur radio
Speaker 1: specifically mentioned. It mentions nothing about amateur radio licensing. It
Speaker 1: mentions nothing about GMRS licensing, and mentions nothing about CB
Speaker 1: radio being free banned because it used to be back
Speaker 1: in the day, thirty forty years ago, used to have
Speaker 1: a license to get on CB radio, citizens band radios
Speaker 1: the same frequencies. They just they gave you a license.
Speaker 1: I don't remember if you had to pay for it
Speaker 1: or not. But nothing like that is mentioned in this document. Okay.
Speaker 1: Through a series of executive orders, President Trump has called
Speaker 1: on administrative agencies to unleash prosperity through deregulation and ensure
Speaker 1: that they are efficiency delivering great results for the American people.
Speaker 1: So this is Elon's email to everybody saying, Hey, send
Speaker 1: me five things you did this week. Cool. You know,
Speaker 1: by this public notice, the FCC is taking action to
Speaker 1: promote policies outlined by President Trump in those executive orders. Specifically,
Speaker 1: we are seeking public input on identifying FCC rules for
Speaker 1: the purpose of alleviating and unnecessary regulatory burdens. Now there
Speaker 1: is a link to voice your public opinion and I
Speaker 1: will put that in the description. Blow. But we seek
Speaker 1: comment on deregulatory initiatives that would facilitate and encourage American
Speaker 1: firms investments in modernizing their networks, developing infrastructure offering innovative
Speaker 1: and advanced capabilities. The Communications Act directs the FCC to
Speaker 1: regularly review its rules to identify and eliminate those that
Speaker 1: are unnecessary in the light of the current circumstances, recognizing that,
Speaker 1: in addition to imposing unnecessary burdens, unnecesary rules may stand
Speaker 1: in the way of deal development, expansion, competition, and technological innovation.
Speaker 1: Now that again, amateur radio is not mentioned in this article. However,
Speaker 1: I will say this the way I read, and this
Speaker 1: is open to interpretation. This is open to interpretation, and
Speaker 1: you might not read this the same way that I
Speaker 1: read the Communications I think they might be talking about
Speaker 1: the Communications Act of nineteen thirty four. There's not a
Speaker 1: footnote down there that says it says the Communications Act.
Speaker 1: There's a kid, there's a Wireless Communications Act of nineteen
Speaker 1: thirty four that's often referred to in these types of documents.
Speaker 1: So right here it says the Communications Act directs the
Speaker 1: FCC to regularly review its rules to identify and eliminate
Speaker 1: those that are unnecessary in the light of current circumstances.
Speaker 1: In other words, times change as the years go by,
Speaker 1: recognizing that in addition to imposing unnecessary burdens, imposing unnecessary burdens,
Speaker 1: unnecessary rules may stand in the way of development, expansion, competition,
Speaker 1: and technological innovation. So the way I read that is
Speaker 1: that amateur radio licensing is a good thing because amateur
Speaker 1: radio licensing has always been regulated with the worldwide goodwill
Speaker 1: in mind. It's always been about international good will. It's
Speaker 1: always been about a worldwide effort. And I'm going to
Speaker 1: talk about the International Telecommunications Union ITU, and I'm going
Speaker 1: to talk about it the other a couple other agencies
Speaker 1: and what my thoughts are on that, so that we're
Speaker 1: going to get into that here in just a second.
Speaker 1: But stand in the way of development, spansion, competition, and
Speaker 1: technological innovation. Every nation, every civilized nation, some uncivilized nations
Speaker 1: in the world, has some sort of amateur radio licensing.
Speaker 1: One of the things that hams seek after and compete for,
Speaker 1: compete with yourself more than anybody, is to see how
Speaker 1: many DX entities you can work. DX entity just simply
Speaker 1: means another country outside of the USA, and in some regards,
Speaker 1: Alaska and Hawaii are considered DX entities because they're not
Speaker 1: actually attached to the Continental USA, and even Canada, which
Speaker 1: is in Mexico, which are attached to the Continental USA,
Speaker 1: are considered DX entities. So contacting these worldwide countries all
Speaker 1: over the planet and entities, and last count I had
Speaker 1: there was like three hundred and fifty of them. I
Speaker 1: got a good friend of mine that's worked three hundred
Speaker 1: and forty nine out of the three hundred and fifty.
Speaker 1: He's worked all of them except one, which is North Korea,
Speaker 1: which is apparently really very hard to get for reasons
Speaker 1: that you should already know and I won't go into.
Speaker 1: So international goodwill is has always been an act behind
Speaker 1: amateur radio and amateur radio licensing. So I don't read
Speaker 1: that as something that would be like, hey, let's just
Speaker 1: get rid of licensing, let's just get rid of it
Speaker 1: that way anybody can do whatever they want. No, that
Speaker 1: would be an unnecessary rule. That my standard the way
Speaker 1: of development, expansion, competition, and technological innovation because amateur radio
Speaker 1: historically that may or may not be true today, but
Speaker 1: him MCHI radio historically has always been on the forefront
Speaker 1: of technology, and I think that a lot of people
Speaker 1: who don't understand amage radio don't understand that it's actually
Speaker 1: kind of still there. But again, that might be different
Speaker 1: story for a different day. So a couple of things
Speaker 1: real quick. I want to start at the beginning, and
Speaker 1: I apologize if this video is going to be longer
Speaker 1: than normal. Well, I want to start at the beginning, okay.
Speaker 1: And I went to chat GPT and I was like, hey,
Speaker 1: chat GPT, now, now let me say this first off,
Speaker 1: say the first thing I'm gonna say about this. I
Speaker 1: asked chat GPT this question yesterday, and then I asked
Speaker 1: chat GPT the same question today and it gave a
Speaker 1: slightly different answer. So I'm not a one hundred percent
Speaker 1: sure how accurate this is. But I did do about
Speaker 1: the last half hour. I did some Google searching, I
Speaker 1: read some articles. I'm gonna share those links with you,
Speaker 1: and for the most part, I think this is fairly accurate.
Speaker 1: Some of this information historically is ambiguous, and I think
Speaker 1: it's just because no one ever recorded it, but some
Speaker 1: of it is accurate. So what was the first amateur
Speaker 1: radio call sign issued in the USA. The first amateur
Speaker 1: radio call sign issued in the USA, according to chat GPT,
Speaker 1: was onew This was assigned to Alfred CW. Lee CW
Speaker 1: was its middle initials. Okay, good, yeah, no coincidence there.
Speaker 1: In nineteen twelve, following the introduction of the first formal
Speaker 1: licensing system for amateur radio operators by the US government,
Speaker 1: the issuance of ONEAW marked the beginning of amateur radio
Speaker 1: regulation in the US, which is formalized by the patches
Speaker 1: of the Wireless Shipped Act of nineteen ten of the
Speaker 1: Radioact of nineteen twelve. Okay, this predates the ABURL, this
Speaker 1: predates the FCC, And then when did amateur radio call
Speaker 1: signs go global? This information here was accurate from Chap
Speaker 1: GPT both yesterday and today. Amateur radio call signs became
Speaker 1: global in nineteen twenty seven when the ITU standardized the
Speaker 1: allocation of call signs for MSIUR radio operators worldwide. This
Speaker 1: was part of the broader effort to organize and regulate
Speaker 1: global radio communications. Before this standardization, amateur radio operators had
Speaker 1: their own systems in practice for assigning call signs, often
Speaker 1: within their own countries. The ITU's involvement helped establish a
Speaker 1: consistent system that assigned different country prefixes, such as W
Speaker 1: for the United States, G four the United Kingdom VK
Speaker 1: for Australia, et cetera amateur radio operators, allowing for clearer
Speaker 1: and more coordinated communications across borders. This move significantly enhanced
Speaker 1: international communication and cooperation among amateur radio operators worldwide. Statement
Speaker 1: that I would agree with right there, So outside of
Speaker 1: the USA, I decided to ask it, Hey, what was
Speaker 1: the first ever amateur radio call sign? I have a
Speaker 1: point to this, so bear with me. The very first
Speaker 1: amateur radio call sign ever was issued was worldwide was
Speaker 1: a A. Your call sign is a Hey Alpha. Your
Speaker 1: call sign is A assigned to Reginald A. Pheesenden, a pioneering
Speaker 1: Canadian inventor and engineer and radio operator. He is often
Speaker 1: regarded as one of the fathers of modern wireless communication.
Speaker 1: Feessenden was granted his call sign in nineteen hundred, long
Speaker 1: before the formal nationalization and international licensing systems were established.
Speaker 1: He used this call sign for his experimental radio stations.
Speaker 1: He worked to lay the foundation for much of modern radio,
Speaker 1: including the first voice transmission over radio. Later amateur radio
Speaker 1: licenses systems became formalized in the nineteen tens and nineteen twenties.
Speaker 1: A can be considered the very first amateur radio call
Speaker 1: sign in the world. The Federal Communications Commission the FCC
Speaker 1: was established on June nineteenth, nineteen thirty four, with the
Speaker 1: passage to the Communications Act of nineteen thirty four. This
Speaker 1: is the Communications Act I think they were talking about earlier.
Speaker 1: FCC was created to regulate interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite,
Speaker 1: and cable. It took over many responsibilities previously held by
Speaker 1: the FRC Federal Radio Commission, which had been established in
Speaker 1: nineteen twenty seven to regulate radio communications. FCC's creation helped
Speaker 1: bring a more structure to the rapid legal and field
Speaker 1: of communications, including both commercial broadcasting the amateur radio, and
Speaker 1: it played a major role in shaping modern telecommunications policies
Speaker 1: in the USA. So, in other words, I have said
Speaker 1: this before and said this many times. Amateur radio license
Speaker 1: existed prior to the FCC. People like to gripe about
Speaker 1: the FCC. They like to complain about the FCC, And
Speaker 1: the FCC is responsible for issuing licenses in the USA today. Okay,
Speaker 1: they are responsible for that. But if you were to
Speaker 1: get rid of the FCC to moral which I don't
Speaker 1: really agree with that, But if you were to get
Speaker 1: rid of the FCC completely moral, it wouldn't affect amateur
Speaker 1: radio license necessarily in the way that some people think
Speaker 1: it might. It would affect something, sure, but not necessarily
Speaker 1: in the way that some people think that it might. Oh,
Speaker 1: just get rid of everything and leveryone go free band now,
Speaker 1: because it wasn't freebanded before the FCC was here, So
Speaker 1: it's not going to be free banned after the FCC.
Speaker 1: There's plenty of options out there for free band, and
Speaker 1: that those frequencies can range from country to country, from
Speaker 1: continent to continent. But amateur radio has always existed prior
Speaker 1: to the FCC, prior to the Federal Radio Commission in
Speaker 1: the United States, and it exists globally internationally across the
Speaker 1: entire planet. Some other googles so it says. Before the
Speaker 1: Radioact of nineteen twelve, amateur radio operators in the USA
Speaker 1: used self assigned call signs, often industrials, like hiring Percy
Speaker 1: Maxim's s n Y in nineteen eleven. After licensing began,
Speaker 1: the government assigned call signs, initially a number followed by
Speaker 1: two letters like one WH or something like that. Pre
Speaker 1: nineteen twelve, self assigned call Signs Radioact of nineteen twelvement
Speaker 1: government government issued call signs, evolution of call signs. Some
Speaker 1: good stuff on Google right here that I found, So
Speaker 1: that was good. There's also a good article I found
Speaker 1: here called the Storied History of the Ham Radio call
Speaker 1: Sign by Mike ritz W seven vo written in August
Speaker 1: of twenty seventeen. This is a good read right here.
Speaker 1: I will put a link to this in the description Blow.
Speaker 1: You guys can go check that out. Again. I didn't
Speaker 1: check it for historical accuracy. He does quote several he
Speaker 1: has a bibliography at the bottom there and quotes several
Speaker 1: links to where he got his information from. So there
Speaker 1: you go. But today's document, we're talking about this here today,
Speaker 1: speaking of Ham Radio. Today's video is sponsored by spe
Speaker 1: Expert Amplifiers, main trading company in Texas is the primary
Speaker 1: distributor of the Italian Expert amplifiers inside of the USA,
Speaker 1: and now they have at least two, maybe more repair
Speaker 1: centers inside the USA. So if you ever have a
Speaker 1: problem with your amplifier, you don't have to send it
Speaker 1: back to Italy anymore. Check out the Lincoln the description
Speaker 1: Blow for all of the really cool lightweight full some
Speaker 1: of them are full power amplifiers offered by Expert Amplifier,
Speaker 1: a leading name and amplifier technology in amateur radio for
Speaker 1: the last couple of decades. Check out the linked to
Speaker 1: the description blow and thank them for sponsoring this video.
Speaker 1: So a couple of thoughts, a couple of my thoughts
Speaker 1: on this, and I'm going to start here. So Josh
Speaker 1: did this video and he was you guys, go watch
Speaker 1: Josh's video, but he was kind enough to post to
Speaker 1: pin my comment to his video. I didn't ask him to,
Speaker 1: he just did it. And my comment here, which is
Speaker 1: what I've been talking about so far in this video. Okay,
Speaker 1: people forget that licensing testing outdates the FCC. They are
Speaker 1: more of an ITU International Telecommunications Union and IAARU the
Speaker 1: International Amateur Radio Union thing. Other regulations that we face
Speaker 1: can be deleted. Sure, I am usually for deregulation overall,
Speaker 1: but some comments will probably be about making ham radio
Speaker 1: bands free band and I don't support that. And that
Speaker 1: was my comment on his video, and I had about
Speaker 1: seventeen replies to it. So Josh commented here, He's like,
Speaker 1: I wanted to tie this international agreements, but at the
Speaker 1: rate we're walking away from agreements in O there airs.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure how well it would stick. Follow up video. Okay,
Speaker 1: this guy says what KQ four l en Z says, No,
Speaker 1: I don't support that either. A Droit nineteen eleven says,
Speaker 1: why don't you support it? And this is kind of
Speaker 1: the point I wanted to talk about here because this
Speaker 1: guy and I don't know who this person is, but
Speaker 1: he had some good comments, not bad mouthing anyone, he
Speaker 1: had some really good comments, So I appreciate his comments there.
Speaker 1: I was trying to get rid of that thing on
Speaker 1: the right, but I can't. Why don't you support it?
Speaker 1: And I said, why should I support it? There's plenty
Speaker 1: of freeband options already available, and anyone is able to
Speaker 1: get a Ham radio license. A lot of people forget that.
Speaker 1: A lot of people, oh, Ham radio is an exclusive club. No,
Speaker 1: it's really not, because you can go get a license.
Speaker 1: Everyone has the ability to go get a Ham radio license,
Speaker 1: unless you're like a hardened criminal, okay, like a sexual
Speaker 1: predator of some sort. Okay, everyone can go get an
Speaker 1: amateur radio license, okay for the most part. And I say,
Speaker 1: I go on to say it's more open to everyone.
Speaker 1: Nearly eight hundred thousand US citizens have taken the time
Speaker 1: to learn the material and get their license. Giving it
Speaker 1: away would be an insult to them, similar to forgiving
Speaker 1: student loans. That's another political topic I don't want to
Speaker 1: get into today, but that's how I feel. And he says,
Speaker 1: I don't think you actually answered my question. Uh yeah,
Speaker 1: I did. I get that it would hurt people's feelings
Speaker 1: that spend money on getting a permission slip. Okay, So,
Speaker 1: first of all, hurt people's feelings and permission slip makes
Speaker 1: me think that this guy is not really serious. He's
Speaker 1: talking in troll language here, okay, but what he's saying
Speaker 1: is not entirely wrong. I just you know. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: let's continue, and I understand why the government wants people
Speaker 1: to get those slips. Aside from hurt feelings, why not
Speaker 1: support deregulation? And I replied back to him, as I
Speaker 1: originally stated, licensing has nothing to do with the government.
Speaker 1: It existed before the government, before the FCC. Okay, as
Speaker 1: I just read to you, that's what this guy's not getting.
Speaker 1: It existed prior to the FCC. Amateur radio is a
Speaker 1: worldwide effort. Other countries have some sort of license. Most
Speaker 1: of them are actually harder to get and cost more
Speaker 1: than and have less privileges than what we do inside
Speaker 1: the USA. Hurt feelings aren't even a factor to me.
Speaker 1: Lots of people worked to get their license, and everyone
Speaker 1: else can do the same thing. This isn't a participation
Speaker 1: trophy hobby. Work for it and you'll get it. You
Speaker 1: are smart enough to do it. And I'm talking directly
Speaker 1: to this guy when I said this, you are smart
Speaker 1: enough to do it. And right here he replies back
Speaker 1: to me, he's like, well, already have my permission slips.
Speaker 1: So he's claiming he has a ham radio license. Okay, good,
Speaker 1: and you still have to give me and you still
Speaker 1: haven't have yet to give me an answer. I've given
Speaker 1: him an answer twice now. He just doesn't like what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. Others have said that it could happen to
Speaker 1: the door having open more frequencies and sold on privileges.
Speaker 1: That's why they don't support regulation. Why don't you So
Speaker 1: he's talking about having the sell off our spectrum in
Speaker 1: our bandwidth to other corporations or something like that. Okay,
Speaker 1: And I replied by a like Finally, I was like, look, man,
Speaker 1: you call it in a permission slip. Makes me think
Speaker 1: you aren't serious. But I'll play a long I do
Speaker 1: support deregulation. I support taking licensing completely away from the
Speaker 1: FCC and giving it back to Ham's. As I've said
Speaker 1: this before. I'm not sure why you think I'm not
Speaker 1: answering you. But again, your comments are moretroll like and
Speaker 1: less than serious than I prefer, but also impossible to
Speaker 1: sense a tone over text. He says, I call the
Speaker 1: driver's license permission slips as well. It's because of my
Speaker 1: view and the government wanting to believe that they control
Speaker 1: free people. Okay, this get so I get this comment
Speaker 1: a lot. Free men don't ask permission. Government control, yeah,
Speaker 1: government control is a real thing. It's a real thing
Speaker 1: I'm against. Okay, but there's such a thing as government control.
Speaker 1: Too much government control and complete anarchy, and we've got
Speaker 1: to figure out where in the middle we want this.
Speaker 1: Licensing is not bad. Licensing's not bad. You have to
Speaker 1: have a license to drive a car, and the reason
Speaker 1: you have to have a license to drive a car
Speaker 1: is because you're driving on publicly funded roads. Okay, you
Speaker 1: don't have to have a license to own a car,
Speaker 1: or if you own one hundred acres of land. You
Speaker 1: don't have to have a license to drive a car
Speaker 1: on your own property. So some people like an amateur
Speaker 1: radio license. Well I don't you know, anybody can get
Speaker 1: driver's license. Sometimes people and I'm like, well, actually, you
Speaker 1: don't have to have a driver's license to buy a
Speaker 1: car and drive it on your own property. You only
Speaker 1: have to have a license to drive it on publicly
Speaker 1: funded roads state local city government and city county roads,
Speaker 1: state roads, federal in interstate highways, whatever. But the airwaves
Speaker 1: are opened everybody, and the airwaves are opened everybody. Okay,
Speaker 1: so well there's no publiclyfunded airwaves, true, but we do
Speaker 1: have a limited spectrum of frequencies on the airwave. And
Speaker 1: like I said a minute ago, since it's an international
Speaker 1: and global effort amateur radio licensing, it's good that it's
Speaker 1: regulated to a certain degree. To a certain degree, I
Speaker 1: don't want to take anything away from anyone, but I
Speaker 1: don't want to give everything for free to everyone either.
Speaker 1: And this comment here by this judlement is pretty good.
Speaker 1: One of the main reasons for the ITU agreement in
Speaker 1: HF communication is HF communications are worldwide, open, no regulated,
Speaker 1: non licensed operations on HF and MF isn't affecting radio
Speaker 1: users in just the USA. They can affect every country
Speaker 1: and every radio user in the world. Many that want
Speaker 1: licensing refer to VHFUHS and SHF. It would be really
Speaker 1: devastating to the world radio community for one country to
Speaker 1: open rogue HF communication not just amateur it's still a
Speaker 1: primary means of communications that makes many places in many
Speaker 1: places around the world. Just because it's not here in
Speaker 1: the US. I don't believe it would be very responsible
Speaker 1: to free band amateur radio bands without the agreement of
Speaker 1: the ITU. My opinion is that we won't see any
Speaker 1: changes to amateur radio, at least not HF and MF.
Speaker 1: As far as vhfuh go, the bands are almost dead.
Speaker 1: Well again, I don't really think that the bands are
Speaker 1: dead in VHFUHF. It might be where he is, but
Speaker 1: it's not like that everywhere. I've been in amateur for
Speaker 1: thirty years and been in commercial radio for twent five
Speaker 1: plus years. If the government does drop licensing requirements for
Speaker 1: amateur radio, please pass the word to the lids that
Speaker 1: have the equipment available cheap. That's good, okay, And then
Speaker 1: some guy other some other guy fires back at him
Speaker 1: and about deregulation and whatnot. So a few more comments there.
Speaker 1: I'll share a link to all that in the description.
Speaker 1: Blow all of that to say, is this. As I
Speaker 1: said in the beginning, this document does not say anything
Speaker 1: about there's this is a lot of speculation. This document
Speaker 1: does not say anything about deregulating specifically amateur radio licensing.
Speaker 1: It doesn't even mention amateur radio licensing. It's just talking
Speaker 1: about the FCC. So everybody's like, what does that mean?
Speaker 1: And it's a good question. It's a good it's good
Speaker 1: to openly discuss what it does say, but it's probably
Speaker 1: not good to spect to overspeculate on what it doesn't say.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of my take on the whole thing. Okay,
Speaker 1: I wanted to I mean, I this is again, this
Speaker 1: is a longer video than I intended it to be.
Speaker 1: But amateur radio licensing in the UN and worldwide existed
Speaker 1: prior to the FCCFCC only controls the USA, anyway, Every
Speaker 1: country around the world has some sort of amateur radio licensing.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's hard to get, sometimes it's expensive to get,
Speaker 1: and in the USA we actually have it pretty easy
Speaker 1: compared you know, compared to the globally, to the global,
Speaker 1: to our global neighbors and other countries around the world.
Speaker 1: So do I support deregulation to a certain degree? Do
Speaker 1: I support free banding the mateur radio bands? No? No,
Speaker 1: I don't go use CB radio. CB radio is HF.
Speaker 1: Guess what HF is from three to thirty megahertz and
Speaker 1: CB radio is around twenty six twenty seven megaherts. So
Speaker 1: CB radio is HF. Go use CB radio if you
Speaker 1: want to use HF on a free band network. That's
Speaker 1: my thoughts. I would let to know what you think.
Speaker 1: Put a comment in the description. Blow Thanks for watching.