Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. The good news
Speaker 1: to start the day, Heidig and All is going to
Speaker 1: co host today, and I'm so happy about that because
Speaker 1: when Amy and I were taking our thirtieth anniversary trip
Speaker 1: and we were overseas, and then, you know, we come
Speaker 1: out of the GOP convention and then Biden is deposed
Speaker 1: and Heidi was doing the show. She was kind enough
Speaker 1: to have me on, and Heidi we got into a
Speaker 1: conversation that I really wanted to follow up on.
Speaker 2: So great of you to co host today because we're.
Speaker 1: Going to obviously be talking a lot about maybe the
Speaker 1: most psycho presidential race in our country's history. But part
Speaker 1: of that is the comment you made just after the
Speaker 1: coup and Harris was being installed, and you made the
Speaker 1: comment about, wait a second, you know, and I'm paraphrasing,
Speaker 1: got to be really really careful here, to be focused
Speaker 1: on the issue and not on this falling out of
Speaker 1: the coconut tree stuff.
Speaker 2: And stuff like that.
Speaker 1: So I wanted to put some more meat on those
Speaker 1: bones and find out because I know you to be
Speaker 1: very attuned. I mean you also happen to be female, right,
Speaker 1: but very very attuned to all of that, and just
Speaker 1: from a woman's perspective as well as a candidate for
Speaker 1: governor and all of that, where you would recommend, if
Speaker 1: you were advising President Trump, where you would recommend drawing
Speaker 1: that line between the policy and the personal. So thank
Speaker 1: you for being here and getting your take on everything
Speaker 1: else today as well. And where do we start on
Speaker 1: that stuff? I mean, we have the Middle East completely
Speaker 1: on the brink now because of the Biden Harris weakness
Speaker 1: and then everything else that's going on locally, and I
Speaker 1: want to get your take on VP. You and I
Speaker 1: were watching together a second ago as CNN flashed up
Speaker 1: its headline Harris campaign says no VP choice yet and
Speaker 1: their joint rally is just hours away.
Speaker 3: Well, hello, Dan, to be here and so happy to
Speaker 3: be co hosting with you.
Speaker 4: Boy, there's a lot to talk about.
Speaker 3: It kept preparing earlier today and I kept having to
Speaker 3: change my notes because a whole other issue would come up,
Speaker 3: and I'm like, wait, it's like whack a mole. Right now,
Speaker 3: there's so much going on, but on Kamala.
Speaker 2: Now you're not calling her a mole, are you? Hause
Speaker 2: I thought no name calling.
Speaker 4: No, No, I'm calling her Kamala. Kamala can No, it's
Speaker 4: whack a mole.
Speaker 3: With all the issues going on, it's like you talk
Speaker 3: about one, then something else pops up, and today the
Speaker 3: news is crazy about lots of different things.
Speaker 4: But I do think we've.
Speaker 3: Got to be very careful and cautious about crossing that line,
Speaker 3: only because it gives fodder to the Democrats and to
Speaker 3: the more establishment Republicans that are anti Trump. They they
Speaker 3: want him to stickle, you know, all of a sudden,
Speaker 3: become this guy that stays right on the message and
Speaker 3: talks about the issue.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And I keep telling my friends who say that to me, like,
Speaker 3: you know, the guy's won a few times. He knows
Speaker 3: how to play this game. Let Trump be Trump. We
Speaker 3: thought him tweeting was a terrible thing in the first election,
Speaker 3: and it turned out that it was kind of nice
Speaker 3: to be able to see what was going on inside
Speaker 3: his head about how he wanted to lead our country.
Speaker 3: So I say, let Trump be Trump. Don't get too
Speaker 3: much in the way, but be respectful. There are so
Speaker 3: many things to pick on her about without having to
Speaker 3: go down that she's a woman path. I could go
Speaker 3: on and on about the issues. The border's MSS, the
Speaker 3: Middle East is a powder keg. The markets are in
Speaker 3: turmoil today, inflation's crazy, prices are high, crimes rampant, and
Speaker 3: a lot of that is due to her and Joe
Speaker 3: Biden's policy. So let's just start there, try and keep
Speaker 3: them on track with that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's another thing I want to talk with
Speaker 2: you about.
Speaker 1: What work in calls as well, is you know, we
Speaker 1: say reflexively, now you know the Biden Harris, the Biden
Speaker 1: hair as set because we want to tie Harris to
Speaker 1: Biden as much as we can since that was a failure.
Speaker 1: I personally don't think she had a thing to do
Speaker 1: with anything. I think they just I think they ignoreder.
Speaker 1: I think they locked her away. And this is one
Speaker 1: of the reasons I want to talk with you about
Speaker 1: what from your perspective, you know, as somebody who's experienced
Speaker 1: a statewide race as a woman, etc. From your perspective,
Speaker 1: is everything personal off limits? Because when you look at Harris,
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any doubt the Biden administration locked
Speaker 1: her away.
Speaker 2: I think if they had involved her to any extent,
Speaker 2: it would have just made it worse.
Speaker 1: But I think there are really fair questions about her
Speaker 1: beyond policy. I'm not talking about this race nonsense. I'm
Speaker 1: talking about fair questions about her and her capabilities, etc.
Speaker 2: And I'll find a bite for you.
Speaker 1: I want to play this bite after the Kramer bite
Speaker 1: where President Trump preferred to her as a low IQ individual,
Speaker 1: and I want to get your take on that now.
Speaker 1: Of course, immediately, you know the leftist media, which is
Speaker 1: almost all of it, labeled that racist, just as they're
Speaker 1: going to label every criticism, almost every criticism of her racist.
Speaker 1: But speaking of the markets, Heidi, and I know you
Speaker 1: to be a very astute businesswoman, so we want to
Speaker 1: get your advice to people as well. Here is Jim
Speaker 1: Kramer's advice on CNBC as to impart how to deal
Speaker 1: with all this financial turmoil today.
Speaker 2: I turn the stock party.
Speaker 6: If you care about your paycheck with you go with Trump.
Speaker 6: If that's what you do, you do, Yeah, well, he
Speaker 6: wants to cut you to I love.
Speaker 2: You think we're going to be seeing that in a spot.
Speaker 4: I hope.
Speaker 3: So I think the Trump campaign should use it in
Speaker 3: a spot that's beautiful.
Speaker 1: And let me play this for you. This is Cassie
Speaker 1: Hans CNN, and she's claiming that Trump slamming Harris as
Speaker 1: a quote low IQ individual is race related. And then
Speaker 1: I want to get your take on two things. First,
Speaker 1: is it race related? But then more broadly, do you
Speaker 1: think this sort of thing is fair game? Should President
Speaker 1: Trump be going there or not?
Speaker 7: We're going to defeat crazy Kamala kama La. You know,
Speaker 7: there's about nineteen different ways of saying it.
Speaker 2: She only likes three.
Speaker 8: She was here a.
Speaker 7: Week ago, lots of empty seats, but the crowds you
Speaker 7: got was because she had entertainers.
Speaker 2: Q refuses to.
Speaker 9: Even say the words.
Speaker 7: Illegal alien or radical Islamic terra. She is considered more
Speaker 7: left wing than crazy Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 8: Look at her.
Speaker 2: She's worse than.
Speaker 7: Bernie, and she happens to be really a low IQ individual.
Speaker 4: Hey, low IQ individual. That was a selection of the
Speaker 4: various ways.
Speaker 3: In which Donald Trump is going on offense against his
Speaker 3: new rival.
Speaker 4: I mean, Megan Hay's this low IQ stuff.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's definitely race related, right, your take?
Speaker 4: That's nuts? It does not have anything to do with race.
Speaker 3: It has to do with her inability to have a
Speaker 3: coherent conversation or answer a question for the press. I mean,
Speaker 3: the clips that are going around are crazy to watch
Speaker 3: her try and articulate any kind of policy. And I
Speaker 3: would love for her take on her economic policy after today,
Speaker 3: with the markets and what's going on. Does she even
Speaker 3: understand what the stock market does? I know that she
Speaker 3: wants to with Biden if she follows his twenty five
Speaker 3: budget plan put a tax on unrealized gains, which today
Speaker 3: would be a disaster.
Speaker 4: For most Americans.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I think I think it had nothing to do.
Speaker 2: With race at all, commonomics. I just coined that.
Speaker 4: Phrase that's good better trademarket.
Speaker 2: Yes, absolutely.
Speaker 1: But then I look at this, okay, and you think,
Speaker 1: how could anybody utter those words that calling her a
Speaker 1: low IQ individual as race related? Because think about what
Speaker 1: the thought process must be for the person in this case.
Speaker 1: Cassie Hunt's saying that awful thing. So she is associating
Speaker 1: people of color with low IQ. I mean, how could
Speaker 1: a you men even get there? But the racial issue
Speaker 1: is clearly on the part of Cassie Hunt, not on
Speaker 1: the part of Donald Trump. It's the opposite when somebody
Speaker 1: if somebody looks at a person and I want to
Speaker 1: get your taken whether you think Kamala is low IQ.
Speaker 1: But if somebody looks at a person and says, Wow,
Speaker 1: I really think that person's low IQ. But I'm not
Speaker 1: willing to say that because of the color of their skin,
Speaker 1: whatever that color may be to me, that's racism. The
Speaker 1: opposite of racism is saying I'm going to treat you
Speaker 1: like everybody else.
Speaker 8: Yeah, so is.
Speaker 1: This and we're up against our break, so let's tease
Speaker 1: it to the other side. But should the president be
Speaker 1: going down this road? Is it you think fair game accurate?
Speaker 1: And even if it's accurate, should he tactically be going
Speaker 1: down this road of referring to her as low IQ?
Speaker 2: Is there?
Speaker 1: If not, is there another way to communicate concerns over
Speaker 1: her her intellectual processing?
Speaker 2: But Heidigen all kind enough to co host the show today.
Speaker 1: Obviously we're going to be talking about the market turmoil
Speaker 1: as it applies to the campaign and to your life,
Speaker 1: talking about whether President Trump anxious to get Heidie's take,
Speaker 1: whether he has the right strategy here to offer to debate,
Speaker 1: but only on Fox refuse the ABC debate that and
Speaker 1: much more.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dame Capless Show.
Speaker 9: And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 6: We have to say woke, like everybody needs to be woke,
Speaker 6: and you can talk about if you're the wokest or
Speaker 6: woke her just stay more woke than less woke.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Can we just run that like in every swing state,
Speaker 1: every spot until election Day? No, we can't because there's
Speaker 1: an even better one, Merry Christmas. Did you hear that
Speaker 1: one where she rails against merry Christmas.
Speaker 2: We can't say Merry Christmas. Don't say Merry Christmas.
Speaker 4: There's so many, Dan, there's so many.
Speaker 3: My favorite Ryan knows this is the cackling, the ongoing cackling.
Speaker 4: Ryan will have to play it for.
Speaker 2: That's the one I created with the jokers laugh.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but I like to sleep too, boy, So Hei,
Speaker 1: do you tell me before we go to the phone
Speaker 1: lines and start getting text in here? This President Trump
Speaker 1: labeling Kamala Harris as a low IQ individual. You know,
Speaker 1: I do think it's fair to talk about the cognitive
Speaker 1: capacity of a presidential candidate, and I think anybody who's
Speaker 1: being honest about it can recognize that there are some
Speaker 1: issues there with Kamala Harris. Do you think low IQ
Speaker 1: individual just in terms of tactics winning the election, you know,
Speaker 1: getting enough of the women's vote to win low IQ individual?
Speaker 1: Are you good with that? Would you do it a
Speaker 1: different way or do you just disagree with the premise.
Speaker 3: It's not my favorite approach, but I'm not running for
Speaker 3: president and Donald Trump is. So you know, I know
Speaker 3: I from running for governor that you talk so much,
Speaker 3: whether you're speed doing speeches or interviews.
Speaker 4: You know, just on the.
Speaker 3: Trail, you start to get relaxed and get into your
Speaker 3: groove and sometimes you say things that you wouldn't you know,
Speaker 3: probably have phased differently. But Donald's going to do Donald,
Speaker 3: So let's just, you know, call it what it is.
Speaker 1: And part of that with Donald doing Donald was going
Speaker 1: after Governor Kemp in Georgia over the weekend, right, and
Speaker 1: George obviously key state you have to have And I
Speaker 1: understand all the folks who said, wait a second, that's
Speaker 1: on discipline. That's crazy, why are you doing that. On
Speaker 1: the other hand, listen, I think part of the big
Speaker 1: appeal of President Trump is his authenticity. He's not just
Speaker 1: a typical, measured politician, and I think that's a tremendous
Speaker 1: contrast point with Kamala Harris, who is Lord knows what.
Speaker 1: So would I have preferred that he not criticize Governor Kemp?
Speaker 2: Yes, you know, because I desperately want to win Georgia.
Speaker 1: But when you look at the bigger picture, these contrasts
Speaker 1: string versus weakness, authentic versus fake, you know there are
Speaker 1: big contrasts in his favor. Let's go to beautiful Colorado Springs.
Speaker 1: Start with Mark. You're on with Dan Kaplis and co
Speaker 1: hosting today the Wonderful Heidi Ganal, How you doing.
Speaker 5: Mark, and find two of you. Thank you for taking
Speaker 5: my call. Hey, I just wanted to talk a little
Speaker 5: bit about the conversation on Friday with Dick Wadhams and
Speaker 5: Donald Trump. And here's what I see, and here's what
Speaker 5: I kind of feel the problem somewhat with the I'm
Speaker 5: a Republican Conservative, and here's what I feel as a
Speaker 5: problem with the Republican Party and the conversation. I felt
Speaker 5: like you could listen to it on the radio. Pick
Speaker 5: it just kind of came across that he does not
Speaker 5: like Donald Trump at all. He may not like the
Speaker 5: way he presents things and that's fine. Sometimes I wish
Speaker 5: he would, you know, Donald would hold back just a
Speaker 5: little bit. But what I just noticed like every time
Speaker 5: he tried to come with something positive, he was like no,
Speaker 5: or there was kind of a negative just connotation sound
Speaker 5: that would come out. And I think this is kind
Speaker 5: of a bigger problem I think with the Republican Party
Speaker 5: or someone leadership is that sometimes we look at a
Speaker 5: politician and if we don't like a couple of things
Speaker 5: with them, we're like, you know what, We're not going
Speaker 5: to vote for that person, or I'm just not going
Speaker 5: to vote at all. And where the Democrats have figured
Speaker 5: it out, I mean it doesn't matter. They could have
Speaker 5: you know, hairs running like she is low IQ and everything,
Speaker 5: which I don't believe she's the sharpest tool in the shed,
Speaker 5: but they will call less around her and they will
Speaker 5: do everything in their power to get her elected. And
Speaker 5: I do like the independent thinking that Republicans have and
Speaker 5: concerns have. I wish we would, you know, we may
Speaker 5: not like everything, but I wish we would quote call
Speaker 5: less more around you know, our president or our governors
Speaker 5: that are running.
Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you, Mark, thank you for framing that so articulately,
Speaker 1: really appreciate that and want to give Heidi a chance
Speaker 1: to address it, but very well framed.
Speaker 2: He Where do you come down on that?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 3: I agree, and I felt that running for governor, it
Speaker 3: was like, no, I'm not perfect.
Speaker 4: I'm a business person, I'm an entrepreneur.
Speaker 3: I care deeply about this country, and I don't have
Speaker 3: this all figured out. There's no rule book for running
Speaker 3: for president, or running for governor, or running for county commissioner.
Speaker 3: And so I think giving a little bit of grace
Speaker 3: to our candidates and understanding that it is intense. Man,
Speaker 3: it is hardcore, it's fun, it's crazy. But we're not
Speaker 3: always going to say everything the way people want us
Speaker 3: to say it. And we don't all agree on everything.
Speaker 3: That's the beauty of the Republican Party too. We're individuals.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And to Mark's point about in the case of Dick
Speaker 1: on Friday saying that he won't vote for Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and I give you my perspective, having known Dick for
Speaker 1: decades now and known him as being one of the
Speaker 1: most deeply committed to conservative issues people I've ever met,
Speaker 1: and he's devoted most of his professional life to that,
Speaker 1: and he's won big tough races. He voted for Trump twice,
Speaker 1: and Dick and I disagreed on Friday, obviously, and I
Speaker 1: pose the obvious questions about Will not supporting him as
Speaker 1: helping Harris, etc. But I think the point it reached
Speaker 1: with Dick was that I think he's so perersddenly, deeply
Speaker 1: offended by President Trump's belief that the twenty twenty election
Speaker 1: was stolen, that Dick just can't support him, giving that
Speaker 1: having supported him twice before.
Speaker 2: And I think it's it's just reached.
Speaker 1: That point where it's so personally important to Dick he
Speaker 1: just can't go there. And you know, well, I'm going
Speaker 1: to support Trump, and I hope everybody else does. I
Speaker 1: think it is a matter of deep personal conviction for Dick,
Speaker 1: and I think it's very sincere on his part. I
Speaker 1: wish he was voting for Trump. I hope he changes
Speaker 1: his mind and does.
Speaker 2: But that's my take on it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I agree with you, Dan, and I think at
Speaker 3: this point, though there's so much at stake in this election,
Speaker 3: how on earth could you let one concern keep you
Speaker 3: from voting for him?
Speaker 1: Yeah, And that's why I said to Dick, I said,
Speaker 1: you know what, I kind of have this fantasy of
Speaker 1: there you are out on the porch where nobody's looking,
Speaker 1: and then you're filling out your ballot and you're fill
Speaker 1: in that circle. Texter Dan, I'm not sure i'd call
Speaker 1: Kamala Lowe cue, but she sounds like she is drunk
Speaker 1: or impaired a lot. Listen, And I don't read that
Speaker 1: to do the pejorative thing, right. Did you see that
Speaker 1: comic the other day on with Joe Rogan who labeled
Speaker 1: her America's wine mom? And I'm not doing that, and
Speaker 1: I'm not going to use that phrase. But I think, listen,
Speaker 1: we're adults here. We have to be honest about what
Speaker 1: a lot of people are thinking. And I think there
Speaker 1: are a lot of people who who believe that there's
Speaker 1: something going on there, that there's some kind of extra
Speaker 1: enjoyment of life going on.
Speaker 4: There, extra enjoyment of life. I like that.
Speaker 9: DD wow.
Speaker 3: I think our bigger concern is how the process played out.
Speaker 3: That they just literally sweeped Biden out, put her in,
Speaker 3: anointed her the candidate, and didn't give anyone an inch
Speaker 3: to say anything about it, and we all went from
Speaker 3: she's the.
Speaker 4: Worst VP ever to She's the best right.
Speaker 1: But you My belief as to why that happened is
Speaker 1: that I think there's one thing you and I can
Speaker 1: be sure of our names. The sun rises in the
Speaker 1: east sets in the west. Three things. And Joe Biden
Speaker 1: wants Kamala Harris to lose. More broadly, Joe Biden wants
Speaker 1: the cabal that humiliated him and deposed him and ran
Speaker 1: him out of the nomination. He wants those people to lose.
Speaker 1: Anybody try to argue that Biden wants the people who
Speaker 1: took him down to succeed. So I think this was
Speaker 1: a Biden maneuver. I think it was a Biden maneuver
Speaker 1: to install Harris before the Obamas and Clooney and everybody
Speaker 1: else could get who they wanted, and now they're stuck
Speaker 1: with Harris. Which listen, could Donald Trump lose to Kamala Harris, Sure,
Speaker 1: but she's going to be a lot weaker than anybody
Speaker 1: else he would have faced, anybody in that top tier
Speaker 1: of theirs.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and it's shocking to me to see the polls
Speaker 3: going up for her. How on earth people can choose
Speaker 3: to vote for what's happening in our country right now
Speaker 3: shocks me.
Speaker 1: Yeah, But I think what we have to look forward
Speaker 1: to with the big smile on our is when that
Speaker 1: sugar high peaks, I think there's nowhere to go but down.
Speaker 1: She'll get a little pop now from whoever her VP is.
Speaker 1: But let's talk about that when we come back. There's
Speaker 1: to be turmoil in that front. Who will her VP be?
Speaker 2: You're on with heidigen All and Dan Kaplis.
Speaker 9: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 10: No longer are you necessarily keeping those private files in
Speaker 10: some file cabinet that's locked in the basement of the house.
Speaker 10: It's on your laptop and it's then therefore up here
Speaker 10: in this cloud that exists above us.
Speaker 4: Right, it's no longer in a physical place.
Speaker 1: And people are going to vote to put her in
Speaker 1: charge of like our economy and everything. So unless you're driving,
Speaker 1: please let's look up together and see if we can
Speaker 1: see the cloud. Can we see that cloud?
Speaker 2: All right? Let's go to Mike Davis.
Speaker 1: He is the founder of the Article three Foundation and
Speaker 1: so much more. Mike, Welcome to the Dan Kapli Show
Speaker 1: with Heidi Ganal.
Speaker 8: Connect with both of you.
Speaker 1: Well, thank you, Mike, appreciate you being here, and I
Speaker 1: know that you and Heidi have had an awful lot
Speaker 1: of history here.
Speaker 2: So Heidi, why don't you take it and run?
Speaker 6: Well?
Speaker 3: Sir, Well, Mike's so glad you could join us. I
Speaker 3: know you've been busy with family and took a little
Speaker 3: time out, but you've done some really big things on
Speaker 3: the judicial front. You are the chief counsel for Senator
Speaker 3: Grassley when he was going through the Kavanaugh nomination. You
Speaker 3: are a civil litigator here in Denver for a long time.
Speaker 3: But I wanted to talk to you for a few
Speaker 3: minutes today about what's happening with the sentencing of Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Today they said they would not defer the sentencing from
Speaker 3: his conviction.
Speaker 4: Is that accurate?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 8: I mean, it sounds like this Democrat man and Judge
Speaker 8: One Marshawn, whose daughter Lauren Mashawn is raising millions of
Speaker 8: dollars off of this unprecedented criminal trial against President Trump
Speaker 8: for that non crime of a businessman suddenly a nuisance
Speaker 8: claim that required Judge Mrschon's refusal. He didn't recuse. In fact,
Speaker 8: he retaliated against President Trump and said if you mentioned
Speaker 8: my daughter's name, you're going to jail essentially, So it
Speaker 8: doesn't surprise me at all that this Wan vershon is
Speaker 8: going to move forward with sentencing. He's going to get
Speaker 8: reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States again,
Speaker 8: because this trial was flawed in so many different ways,
Speaker 8: but the one key way it was flawed was that
Speaker 8: Supreme Court just decided.
Speaker 5: The issue of presidential immunity, and you.
Speaker 8: Cannot prosecute a former president, a former president for his
Speaker 8: official acts while he was the president of the United States.
Speaker 8: And you also can't use evidence of his confidential conversations
Speaker 8: with his staff as president that those are immune. And
Speaker 8: that's exactly what this Soros funded Manhattan da Alvin Bragg
Speaker 8: and this corrupt Democrat judge Wan Verschon did in this
Speaker 8: bogus show trial in New York City so they could
Speaker 8: try to convict President Trump on September eighteenth, they could
Speaker 8: try to impose a sentence on him. But I think
Speaker 8: President Trump will be able to get a stay of
Speaker 8: execution very quickly if the New York courts don't step up,
Speaker 8: which I don't expect them to do because they're so
Speaker 8: left wing, I think the Supreme Court will step up
Speaker 8: on the emergency docket and stop this.
Speaker 4: Well, Mike, I don't think you've been on Twitter much today.
Speaker 3: But the Democrats are already preparing his prison sale at
Speaker 3: Rikers as we speak, and just salivating at the thought
Speaker 3: of having him go to jail for a year or so.
Speaker 3: How is that going to play out? Or they will
Speaker 3: an appeal happen right away? Or could he spend a
Speaker 3: little bit of time in jail during.
Speaker 8: This Look if the Democrats want to take our country
Speaker 8: over the edge. After they tried to bankrupt Trump, they
Speaker 8: tried to throw him in prison for the rest of
Speaker 8: his life. They tried to take him off the balance,
Speaker 8: and the Supreme Court stepped in and stop them. So
Speaker 8: how did the Democrats respond? You had Joe Biden and
Speaker 8: Kamala Harris intentionally underfunding President Trump's take a Service detail
Speaker 8: after they said he was an existential threat to democracy,
Speaker 8: a dictator who must be stopped at all costs, and
Speaker 8: then Biden said to put a bullseye on Trump. Well,
Speaker 8: I don't know how you can say that that would
Speaker 8: not lead to what happened to President Trump with that
Speaker 8: assassination attempts. Right, if you underfund a detail and say
Speaker 8: he must be stopped at all costs, that failed, And
Speaker 8: so now Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are trying to
Speaker 8: destroy the Supreme Court of the United States that got
Speaker 8: in their way. They say that Trump's the dictator. This
Speaker 8: is what Biden and Kamala Harris are doing. Is right
Speaker 8: out of the dictator's playbook.
Speaker 1: Mike Davis, our guest, founder of the Article three Foundation, Mike,
Speaker 1: I think this prosecution was politically motivated. I think that
Speaker 1: it's fundamentally un American in that respect, threatens the foundation
Speaker 1: of our system. I'm with you, and I think that
Speaker 1: it's going to be overturned. Conviction will be overturned, obviously,
Speaker 1: the sentencing as part of that, etc. Where my question
Speaker 1: arises is with the corruption, because, as you know, as
Speaker 1: an accomplished attorney, I mean that word can be used
Speaker 1: in so many different senses. I have not seen any
Speaker 1: evidence that this judge is corrupt in the legally prosecutable sense.
Speaker 1: Are you referring to corruption in some other sense?
Speaker 8: No, He's very corrupt in both the criminal sense and
Speaker 8: in the ethic sense. You had a former federal Clinton
Speaker 8: judge go on Caitlin Collins's show. I think it was
Speaker 8: like April sixth, but I'd have to go pull up
Speaker 8: the date on Cienna not exactly in Maga country and
Speaker 8: said this former Clinton federal judge said that Judge Merchant
Speaker 8: is required by New York statute to refuse from this
Speaker 8: case because in New York they go out six degrees
Speaker 8: of separation. The daughter is in the first degree of separation.
Speaker 8: She has a direct financial interest in this criminal p
Speaker 8: execution over which her father is presiding. She is a
Speaker 8: fundraiser for Kamala Harrison, Joe Biden, and many other top Democrats.
Speaker 8: She's raising money off of this unprecedent criminal trial over
Speaker 8: which her father's presiding. As a fundraiser, she gets a
Speaker 8: cut of whatever she raises. This is a clear cutcase
Speaker 8: where Judge Marshawn must have refused. And this is the
Speaker 8: same Judge Maarschaum that was supposedly randomly assigned to all
Speaker 8: these Trump cases. You had the Trump Organization case, you
Speaker 8: had the Trump CFO case, you had this Trump case,
Speaker 8: you had you had Steve Bannett case. This judge realized
Speaker 8: that he's so core, realized he got top being so
Speaker 8: corrupt that he actually he actually just took himself off
Speaker 8: of Steve Bannon's upcoming criminal trial and New York. This
Speaker 8: guy is corrupt. He's corrupt under New York statutes. He's
Speaker 8: also corrupt under our federal criminal statues at eighteen the
Speaker 8: USC three forty one and three too. It's conspiracy against rights.
Speaker 8: When you are a judge and you are illegally violating
Speaker 8: the constitutional rights of Americans, you could be prosecuted under
Speaker 8: our federal civil rights laws.
Speaker 1: And do you expect there to be any prosecution? Is
Speaker 1: that something that could then, let's say that President Trump won,
Speaker 1: Is that something that a Trump Justice Department could legitimately
Speaker 1: prosecute as opposed to any kind of political retaliation.
Speaker 8: Nobody's above the laws, the Democrats always say. And when
Speaker 8: you are conspiring to violate the civil rights of President Trump,
Speaker 8: his top aide like Steve Bannon and Peter Davarro, Peter Navarrow,
Speaker 8: his lawyers like Jeffrey Clark and John Eastpend and Rudy
Speaker 8: Giuliani his supporters. On January sixth, parents outraged by gender
Speaker 8: chaos and schools and the resulting rapes and bathrooms when
Speaker 8: you're putting seventy five year old Christian Christians in prison
Speaker 8: for pri at abortion clinics, but the same Biden Harris
Speaker 8: Justice Department gives amnesty to Joe Biden and Hunter Biden
Speaker 8: and James Biden and every other scumbag Biden who's taken
Speaker 8: more than twenty million dollars that House Oversight Chairman James
Speaker 8: Cumber has been able to document going in to their
Speaker 8: bank accounts from Russia, China, Ukraine, Kazakhstan. When you give
Speaker 8: amnesty to these BLM and Antifa rioters, these abortion industry activists,
Speaker 8: these trans terrorists, these Hamas supporters who are terrorizing Jews
Speaker 8: all over America, particularly Jews on college campuses. But there
Speaker 8: needs to be a reckoning. On January twentieth at noon,
Speaker 8: the second that President Trump has worn and there must
Speaker 8: be a reckoning. We need to We need to make
Speaker 8: sure that this never happens again. This republic ending welfare
Speaker 8: and election in apperance by these Biden and Kamala Harris Democrats.
Speaker 8: They have taken our country to the brank they lost,
Speaker 8: and then they're trying to dust themselves off again and
Speaker 8: go again with this chuck in in DC. Go going
Speaker 8: forward with the bogus case in DC, and UH and
Speaker 8: Juan Marshan and Alvin Brad going forward with their bogus
Speaker 8: case in New York. This lawfare is unrelenting on their part.
Speaker 8: It's going to destroy our country. And they must these
Speaker 8: biden here as Democrats at the Justice Department, and these
Speaker 8: Democrat DA offices in New York d C. At Atlanta,
Speaker 8: Arizona AG's office, these judges like Chumkin Marshawn, they must
Speaker 8: face face a criminal probe and they must face severe legal,
Speaker 8: financial and political consecutions with their founder of engagement conspiracy.
Speaker 3: Mike. We have to head to a break, but I
Speaker 3: just want to tell you how much I appreciate you
Speaker 3: coming on and giving us some your perspective.
Speaker 4: I love how passionate you are about this and.
Speaker 3: It'll be really interesting to see how this plays out.
Speaker 3: So thanks again.
Speaker 1: And Mike, can you tell people how to follow you?
Speaker 1: Not in the creepy way, this social way.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I'm heavily armed, so don't follow me. It's an
Speaker 8: articles three project dot org. Article for three project dot org.
Speaker 8: You can donate there, you can take action there, and
Speaker 8: you can find us on social media. And thank you
Speaker 8: very much.
Speaker 1: Hey, thank you, Mike. And when we come back, Heidi,
Speaker 1: I want to get your take on. Okay, the DC
Speaker 1: case appears to be ramping up again, they're going to
Speaker 1: go ahead with this sentencing in this bogus prosecution. Is
Speaker 1: that going to help her her Trump politically? You're on
Speaker 1: the Dankapla Show.
Speaker 9: And now back to the dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 10: So you're now no longer are you necessarily keeping those
Speaker 10: private files in some file cabinet that's locked in the
Speaker 10: basement of the house. It's on your laptop and it's
Speaker 10: then therefore up here in this cloud that exists above us.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 10: And as a woman, there's a balance to be struck
Speaker 10: between being tough.
Speaker 4: And being a bitch.
Speaker 1: That's going to make you sleep better, that's If that doesn't,
Speaker 1: this will.
Speaker 11: Turn up.
Speaker 7: Talk about masculinity for a moment, as being second gentleman
Speaker 7: changed your own view of perceived gender roles of what
Speaker 7: it means to be a man.
Speaker 11: That's this is something I've I've thought about a lot
Speaker 11: and something I've spoken about a lot. There's too much
Speaker 11: of toxicity, it's masculine toxicity out there, and we've kind
Speaker 11: of confused what it means to be a man, what
Speaker 11: it means to be masculine, where you've got this trope
Speaker 11: out there that you've got to be tough and you know,
Speaker 11: angry and lash out to be strong.
Speaker 2: It's just the opposite. Wow.
Speaker 1: So that's Doug M. Hoff who's now admitted what Heidi?
Speaker 2: What? What did he do?
Speaker 3: He had an affair with their I guess it was
Speaker 3: their first grader's teacher or something in his first marriage
Speaker 3: and got the gal pregnant, which broke up his first marriage.
Speaker 4: And she did not have the child whatever they mean
Speaker 4: by that.
Speaker 2: And that's CNN's phraseology. Yeh, did not have the child? Yeah?
Speaker 1: And so is that inside or outside the toxic masculinity category?
Speaker 3: Oh my gosh, I don't even know what they mean
Speaker 3: by it anymore. They changed their definitions daily.
Speaker 1: Well, and let me read you a text and then
Speaker 1: ask you, is this do you think inbounds are out
Speaker 1: of bounds? For the campaign? I'm talking technically as well
Speaker 1: as fundamental fairness. Texter says Dan. I'm a female millennial
Speaker 1: Republican at heart, but Trump will not get my vote.
Speaker 1: If Donald just does Donald, he will have a hard
Speaker 1: time appealing to my vote demographic with his constant drama.
Speaker 1: He needs to focus on issues rather than bringing up
Speaker 1: the intelligence and character of Harris.
Speaker 2: What say you, how do you get.
Speaker 3: All I would ask that Texter if she really wants
Speaker 3: increased taxes, increased crime, more open border, more chaos, more
Speaker 3: stock market crashes, all because he.
Speaker 4: Made a comment.
Speaker 2: Right, what offends you more?
Speaker 8: Right?
Speaker 1: What offends you more? And go right down the list
Speaker 1: right just the legal to the instant of birth, mass
Speaker 1: slaughter of children before birth, the world on fire versus
Speaker 1: the world at peace. You know everything you just described, Heidi,
Speaker 1: closed borders or open borders. I agree, there are some
Speaker 1: things a reasonable person can be offended by with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But what offends you more? Those personality type things or
Speaker 1: these disastrous consequences we get from the Democrats?
Speaker 3: I agree, and I do not want our first female
Speaker 3: president if we're going to go, you know, down the
Speaker 3: road of talking about gender, to be Kamala Harris. She
Speaker 3: does not represent what I want from my three daughters,
Speaker 3: and I don't believe she's a good example for how
Speaker 3: our country wants our first woman president to be.
Speaker 4: I mean, it's just it breaks.
Speaker 1: My heart well, which brings me back to my premise,
Speaker 1: true or untrue, that Kamala Harris cannot win this election.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump can lose it. America is not going to
Speaker 1: vote for Kamala Harris, but unfortunately enough Americans might vote
Speaker 1: against Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: I believe that, Dan.
Speaker 3: I do think that things are going to get so
Speaker 3: painful in the next couple months that it will shift
Speaker 3: just because of the pain around the economy, the markets,
Speaker 3: the crime, the turmoil is going to get unbearable. And
Speaker 3: I don't think there's anything the Democrats can do to
Speaker 3: stop that.
Speaker 5: No.
Speaker 2: I think that's a great point.
Speaker 1: And they can hide her, right, they can hide her
Speaker 1: for most of the campaign. I think that's the reality.
Speaker 1: It's been what fourteen days now, and she hasn't done
Speaker 1: an interview, and the one time they let her talk
Speaker 1: for thirty seconds, it didn't go well. Do you think
Speaker 1: President Trump did the right thing or wrong thing in
Speaker 1: saying that he will debate but only on Fox and
Speaker 1: only under those terms, and he will not do the
Speaker 1: ABC debate on the tenth.
Speaker 2: Oh.
Speaker 3: I wish he would debate her whenever, wherever, on whatever terms.
Speaker 3: I think it would be just awesome to watch. He
Speaker 3: must have some reasoning for doing that, some tactics. I
Speaker 3: do understand that he might be in a lawsuit with
Speaker 3: ABC or CBA at one of the stations, but that's
Speaker 3: is that well to debate with them.
Speaker 2: I don't think so.
Speaker 1: But Heidi, what about this counter argument, which is, wait
Speaker 1: a second. The reason Kamala Harris, whoever is managing her,
Speaker 1: the reason the cabal wants to debate Trump a lot
Speaker 1: is they are living in mortal fear of that day
Speaker 1: when her sugar high peaks and there's nowhere to go
Speaker 1: but down. Because once America gets a better look at her,
Speaker 1: once the immediate rush of oh, she's not Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: she's young, she can dance, she can talk, she can
Speaker 1: put a paragraph toget once that high wears off and
Speaker 1: they start to look at who she really is and
Speaker 1: what she really believes. I think the Democrats are terrified
Speaker 1: there's nowhere to go but down. So I think they
Speaker 1: want multiple debates with Trump just to try to give
Speaker 1: her away, because compared to what Biden did in the debates, right,
Speaker 1: she's going to look like the greatest thing ever. Just
Speaker 1: to give her a way to try to keep some
Speaker 1: momentum going.
Speaker 3: I agree, but I think that'll backfire on them. I mean,
Speaker 3: we're on the brink of World War three right now,
Speaker 3: so there's that too.
Speaker 4: We haven't talked about.
Speaker 1: That's looming you, well, let's do that. When we go back,
Speaker 1: let's talk about the economy. We'll tie it into the
Speaker 1: presidential as well, but also just some professional advice, different
Speaker 1: bites on what people should do. But then Israel, do
Speaker 1: you think the endgame and they'd be justifying in doing
Speaker 1: it is at this point to take out as part
Speaker 1: of this next phase, aron Z nukes.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan Kapli Show with Heidi Ganoll