WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.319 --> 00:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>This week's episode of the Tripcast is supported by Raise

2
00:00:05.040 --> 00:00:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Your Hand Texas and Water Groves. Hello and welcome to

3
00:00:16.280 --> 00:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Tribune trip Cast for January tenth, twenty twenty five.

4
00:00:20.600 --> 00:00:21.359
<v Speaker 2>We are back.

5
00:00:21.480 --> 00:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>The Tribune trip Cast is back after a short hiatus.

6
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everyone for joining us back. My name is Matthew Watkins,

7
00:00:29.719 --> 00:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief of the Texas Tribune, and I am

8
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:37.039
<v Speaker 1>joined by our two new Trip Cast co hosts, Eleanor Klibanoff.

9
00:00:37.200 --> 00:00:39.119
<v Speaker 3>Hello, Eleanor, Hello, thanks for having.

10
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:40.039
<v Speaker 2>Me and James Bettergan.

11
00:00:40.520 --> 00:00:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Hello, gat to be back.

12
00:00:42.359 --> 00:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you back, and we are Our guest

13
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>today is Jasper Sharer Paulitics, reporter for the Texas Tribune.

14
00:00:48.640 --> 00:00:51.079
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Jasper, Hey, thanks for letting me crash.

15
00:00:51.119 --> 00:00:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely we are happy to have you. The subject of

16
00:00:55.840 --> 00:00:59.119
<v Speaker 1>this first special edition of the trip Cast is the

17
00:00:59.240 --> 00:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>legislative set that begins Tuesday. It'll be the beginning of

18
00:01:02.679 --> 00:01:05.519
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred and forty day sprint that will touch

19
00:01:05.560 --> 00:01:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the lives of every single Texan in the state. They'll

20
00:01:09.840 --> 00:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>determine how much to spend on schools, how much our

21
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>property taxes are, you know, road construction, little things, you know,

22
00:01:16.719 --> 00:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>will designate some state flower that pollinates or something.

23
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:22.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. We already have a.

24
00:01:22.799 --> 00:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>State flower of anything's like that. But but you know,

25
00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a major moment in the lives of Texans, whether they

26
00:01:28.200 --> 00:01:30.719
<v Speaker 1>know it or not. And today we are going to

27
00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>preview that that session, talk about the key issues, but

28
00:01:36.079 --> 00:01:38.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe most importantly and what will take up a big

29
00:01:38.480 --> 00:01:41.879
<v Speaker 1>part of our discussion at the beginning is the speaker's race.

30
00:01:42.079 --> 00:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Any ledge preview has to start there. And what I'm

31
00:01:44.959 --> 00:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going to do here bear with me all three is

32
00:01:46.959 --> 00:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to just go through a sort of table

33
00:01:50.079 --> 00:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>setter of where we are right now. I'm going to

34
00:01:52.719 --> 00:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>try to do it as fast as I can, but

35
00:01:54.159 --> 00:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. So here we go. Last year's legislative session

36
00:01:58.560 --> 00:02:01.799
<v Speaker 1>and the special sessions that fall ended with many people

37
00:02:01.959 --> 00:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of repeating the claim that House Speaker Dade Feelin is,

38
00:02:06.040 --> 00:02:08.879
<v Speaker 1>if not the most then at least one of the

39
00:02:08.879 --> 00:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>most conservative speakers in Texas history. But there were three

40
00:02:12.319 --> 00:02:16.599
<v Speaker 1>things that happened under his watch that turned many Republicans

41
00:02:16.599 --> 00:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>against him. The first one he continued the tradition of

42
00:02:19.960 --> 00:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>selecting Democratic committee chairs. The second one is Attorney General

43
00:02:24.879 --> 00:02:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Ken Paxon was impeached under his watch, later acquitted by

44
00:02:27.919 --> 00:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. The third one is Greg Abbott's Priority voucher

45
00:02:31.680 --> 00:02:36.039
<v Speaker 1>bill failed in the House multiple times under his watch.

46
00:02:36.159 --> 00:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Essentially since then there has been intense pressure on the House.

47
00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Abbot and Paxxton and their allies targeted multiple Feelin allies

48
00:02:43.680 --> 00:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in the GOP primaries. Anti Feelin forces sort of rallied

49
00:02:47.840 --> 00:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>around David Cook as a new Speaker candidate, and under

50
00:02:51.280 --> 00:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that pressure, Dade Feelin dropped out. Dustin Burrows, a Republican

51
00:02:55.639 --> 00:03:00.599
<v Speaker 1>from the Panhandle Lubbock area, stepped in. It created what

52
00:03:01.080 --> 00:03:03.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of is a two person race, although we'll talk

53
00:03:03.479 --> 00:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>about whether that actually is true or not, in which

54
00:03:07.280 --> 00:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>really kind of both sides have at various times claimed victory.

55
00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Caucus rules say that GOP members must vote for the

56
00:03:13.759 --> 00:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>caucus endorse candidate. On December seventh, that caucus met, but

57
00:03:18.479 --> 00:03:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Burrough's supporters walked out of the meeting after two rounds

58
00:03:21.159 --> 00:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of voting where no one could get to the sixty

59
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>percent threshold. The remaining voters then voted forty eight to

60
00:03:27.319 --> 00:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to endorse Cook, earning him the official endorsement of

61
00:03:30.680 --> 00:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Majority Party and the requirement that basically or the

62
00:03:34.560 --> 00:03:38.039
<v Speaker 1>expectation that Republicans in the caucus vote for him, but

63
00:03:38.240 --> 00:03:41.159
<v Speaker 1>soon after that, Burroughs on that same day declared that

64
00:03:41.280 --> 00:03:45.479
<v Speaker 1>he had the seventy six votes necessary to become a speaker,

65
00:03:45.719 --> 00:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>half Democrats, half Republicans. But soon after that some of

66
00:03:49.360 --> 00:03:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the people on Burroughs list said they shouldn't have been

67
00:03:51.919 --> 00:03:56.039
<v Speaker 1>on it, which brought his vote count back under seventy six.

68
00:03:56.439 --> 00:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It's been very intense, a lot of pressure on people

69
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to change their votes, particularly the Borough supporters. After that,

70
00:04:03.000 --> 00:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we've had Amoro businessman Alex Ferry saying he'd spend twenty

71
00:04:06.879 --> 00:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in the next primary to quote, expand a

72
00:04:09.840 --> 00:04:13.199
<v Speaker 1>new majority. We'll talk more about what that means. Paxton

73
00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>has toured the state in support of Cook. Abbott has

74
00:04:16.240 --> 00:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>said members should select a speaker quote in accordance with

75
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>caucus rules, which many people to take took to mean

76
00:04:22.759 --> 00:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a sort of endorsement of Cook and the GOP. The

77
00:04:26.399 --> 00:04:29.439
<v Speaker 1>actual state party has said it'll censure members who vote

78
00:04:29.519 --> 00:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for the non caucus pick, potentially removing them from the

79
00:04:32.720 --> 00:04:37.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six primary ballot. Meanwhile, Democrats don't really seem

80
00:04:37.800 --> 00:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to all be on the same page, or at least

81
00:04:39.759 --> 00:04:43.439
<v Speaker 1>publicly have not rallied around an individual candidate. This all

82
00:04:43.480 --> 00:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>sets up Tuesday, the first day of the session, when

83
00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:50.639
<v Speaker 1>there will be a vote on the House Speaker. Okay,

84
00:04:50.839 --> 00:04:53.079
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be basically, I think the first time since

85
00:04:53.120 --> 00:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the seventies where we'll go into that day not knowing

86
00:04:56.720 --> 00:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>who the House Speaker is going to be unless something

87
00:04:59.000 --> 00:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>changes between then and now. First of all, Jasper, did

88
00:05:01.720 --> 00:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I get that right? Did I miss anything?

89
00:05:03.279 --> 00:05:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

90
00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:06.759
<v Speaker 5>I think that was a pretty pretty solid summary. I mean,

91
00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:10.040
<v Speaker 5>it's it's it's kind of weird how you mentioned. This

92
00:05:10.120 --> 00:05:13.480
<v Speaker 5>is just sort of unprecedented over the last handful of

93
00:05:13.519 --> 00:05:16.439
<v Speaker 5>decades to go in with so much uncertainty. It's kind

94
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:20.519
<v Speaker 5>of created this sense of, you know, just sort of inertia,

95
00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:24.040
<v Speaker 5>just a lack of movement. You know, nobody really you know,

96
00:05:24.079 --> 00:05:27.040
<v Speaker 5>the polsy discussions that you might expect to be having,

97
00:05:27.600 --> 00:05:31.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, heading into the session. There's just way more uncertainty,

98
00:05:32.040 --> 00:05:36.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, a week before we're set to kick off,

99
00:05:36.120 --> 00:05:38.680
<v Speaker 5>because nobody knows who's going to be in charge of

100
00:05:39.279 --> 00:05:41.519
<v Speaker 5>you know, one half of this b cameral legislature.

101
00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>James, give me, like a brief introduction to these two

102
00:05:44.720 --> 00:05:48.439
<v Speaker 1>candidates are what do they represent? Who what's their backgrounds.

103
00:05:48.519 --> 00:05:50.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a certain extent, it's not really about the

104
00:05:50.680 --> 00:05:53.120
<v Speaker 6>two candidates. It's about the camps that they're in, which

105
00:05:53.160 --> 00:05:57.360
<v Speaker 6>is that Dustin Burrows is the establishment candidate of the

106
00:05:57.399 --> 00:06:02.639
<v Speaker 6>traditional business minded Republicans, and he argues that he is conservative.

107
00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:06.360
<v Speaker 6>He just doesn't want to do every single thing that

108
00:06:06.439 --> 00:06:08.480
<v Speaker 6>the right wing of the party wants him to do.

109
00:06:08.560 --> 00:06:11.079
<v Speaker 6>And I think he would say that, particularly the people

110
00:06:11.079 --> 00:06:13.519
<v Speaker 6>who fund the right wing would want him to do.

111
00:06:14.399 --> 00:06:18.000
<v Speaker 6>David Cook is an unusual pick for this right wing

112
00:06:18.120 --> 00:06:22.839
<v Speaker 6>coalition that's trying to take over the speaker's gavel in

113
00:06:22.920 --> 00:06:26.000
<v Speaker 6>the House because he's kind of a pretty moderate guy.

114
00:06:26.120 --> 00:06:28.600
<v Speaker 6>He's like in the middle of that GOP caucus, so

115
00:06:28.639 --> 00:06:30.519
<v Speaker 6>it's kind of strange that he is the guy that

116
00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:32.720
<v Speaker 6>they went with. But people in his camp had said,

117
00:06:32.839 --> 00:06:35.560
<v Speaker 6>it's not really about him, it's not really about his policies.

118
00:06:35.560 --> 00:06:37.920
<v Speaker 6>We kind of disagree with him on some of the policies,

119
00:06:38.079 --> 00:06:43.360
<v Speaker 6>but it's about changing the way the speaker operates, meaning

120
00:06:44.319 --> 00:06:48.240
<v Speaker 6>we want there to be you know, less ticky tacky

121
00:06:48.399 --> 00:06:51.360
<v Speaker 6>points of order or less like more flow with the

122
00:06:51.399 --> 00:06:55.439
<v Speaker 6>parliamentarians and more I would say, looseness on the rules

123
00:06:55.800 --> 00:06:57.279
<v Speaker 6>they might contest that, but that's I.

124
00:06:57.199 --> 00:06:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Think what it is.

125
00:06:59.199 --> 00:07:03.120
<v Speaker 6>They want a commitment from the speaker to prioritize Republican

126
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Party of Texas legislation, and they want no democratic chairs,

127
00:07:09.079 --> 00:07:12.199
<v Speaker 6>which Burrows hasn't committed, but he sort of has because

128
00:07:12.240 --> 00:07:14.279
<v Speaker 6>he says he'll leave it up to the will of

129
00:07:14.279 --> 00:07:19.279
<v Speaker 6>the members, which with an eighty eight Republican majority, it'd

130
00:07:19.319 --> 00:07:22.319
<v Speaker 6>be hard not to see that ban on democratic chairs.

131
00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:25.560
<v Speaker 6>So a lot going on there, but it's basically a

132
00:07:25.560 --> 00:07:28.360
<v Speaker 6>showdown between the right wing of the party and sort

133
00:07:28.360 --> 00:07:33.000
<v Speaker 6>of that traditional business minded Republican faction of the party.

134
00:07:33.399 --> 00:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Can that's a question what is a speaker of the House,

135
00:07:37.959 --> 00:07:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Like why does this matter? You know, for like outside

136
00:07:40.319 --> 00:07:43.079
<v Speaker 3>of the sort of the Republican Party has dominated Texas

137
00:07:43.120 --> 00:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. This is all like we're talking

138
00:07:45.600 --> 00:07:50.519
<v Speaker 3>about a small corner of the party fighting against another

139
00:07:50.560 --> 00:07:52.680
<v Speaker 3>small corner of the party. Like what is the impact

140
00:07:52.680 --> 00:07:53.240
<v Speaker 3>for Texans?

141
00:07:53.319 --> 00:07:56.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think a lot of it is like inside baseball, honestly.

142
00:07:56.279 --> 00:07:58.959
<v Speaker 6>But what the speaker does is he's the traffic cop.

143
00:07:59.040 --> 00:08:02.720
<v Speaker 6>He directs the flow of how the chamber is going

144
00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:05.439
<v Speaker 6>to run. He appoints the committees, he appoints the people

145
00:08:05.439 --> 00:08:08.680
<v Speaker 6>who lead the committees, which bestows a lot of power

146
00:08:08.720 --> 00:08:11.560
<v Speaker 6>because if a chairman or chairwoman doesn't like your bill,

147
00:08:11.560 --> 00:08:12.079
<v Speaker 6>then they're not.

148
00:08:12.040 --> 00:08:12.839
<v Speaker 4>Going to move it right.

149
00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:17.720
<v Speaker 6>They also appoint the calendar's committee chairperson, who like decides

150
00:08:17.759 --> 00:08:21.160
<v Speaker 6>what gets on the House floor, and they also decide

151
00:08:21.160 --> 00:08:23.560
<v Speaker 6>sort of, you know, what the flow is going to be,

152
00:08:23.720 --> 00:08:26.040
<v Speaker 6>what the pace is going to be of the chamber,

153
00:08:26.360 --> 00:08:28.480
<v Speaker 6>which goes into a lot of the dynamics between the

154
00:08:28.519 --> 00:08:31.399
<v Speaker 6>House and the Senate. You know, they theoretically are working

155
00:08:31.399 --> 00:08:34.279
<v Speaker 6>together to pass legislation, but sometimes they are at odds

156
00:08:34.320 --> 00:08:37.039
<v Speaker 6>because you know, there's one hundred and fifty House members,

157
00:08:37.080 --> 00:08:39.240
<v Speaker 6>so they're elected by less people, and then there's thirty

158
00:08:39.279 --> 00:08:41.559
<v Speaker 6>one members in the Senate who are elected by more people,

159
00:08:41.919 --> 00:08:45.159
<v Speaker 6>and so there's like a little bit of a different constituency.

160
00:08:45.639 --> 00:08:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I would also say that in the recent history of

161
00:08:48.440 --> 00:08:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the legislature, there's always been one chamber that has been

162
00:08:52.360 --> 00:08:57.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of the like calming, cooling, moderating force on the legislature.

163
00:08:57.639 --> 00:09:01.519
<v Speaker 1>For a while, that was the Senate, particularly under David Dewhurst.

164
00:09:01.840 --> 00:09:04.039
<v Speaker 1>At the time they had the two thirds rule. Basically,

165
00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>any bill that reached the House of the Senate floor

166
00:09:06.840 --> 00:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>had to have the approval of two thirds of the chamber.

167
00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That usually meant some kind of bipartisan support for the

168
00:09:12.600 --> 00:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>bill to reach the floor, and that you required compromise

169
00:09:17.000 --> 00:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to get that done. Dan Patrick, when he

170
00:09:19.159 --> 00:09:22.919
<v Speaker 1>was elected Lieutenant governor to preside over the Senate, changed

171
00:09:22.919 --> 00:09:26.879
<v Speaker 1>that rule to three fifths, which then gave Republicans essentially

172
00:09:26.960 --> 00:09:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a super majority and able to kind of exactly it

173
00:09:29.679 --> 00:09:34.279
<v Speaker 1>lowers the threshold. But around that time you had Joe

174
00:09:34.320 --> 00:09:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Strauss come into the House, and Joe Strauss was elected

175
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:40.799
<v Speaker 1>by a coalition of Democrats and more moderate Republicans. He

176
00:09:40.840 --> 00:09:42.519
<v Speaker 1>was a more moderate member and was sort of a

177
00:09:42.559 --> 00:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>thorn in the side and enemy of that kind of

178
00:09:45.080 --> 00:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>hardline right side of the party. Speakers since Strauss have

179
00:09:49.519 --> 00:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten I think more conservative. I don't think anyone would

180
00:09:53.519 --> 00:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that, but to the extent that there has

181
00:09:56.320 --> 00:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>been things to kind of slow down that a Republican agenda,

182
00:10:01.799 --> 00:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it has often been in the House. The school voucher

183
00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:07.399
<v Speaker 1>vote is an example of that. I think one of

184
00:10:07.399 --> 00:10:11.519
<v Speaker 1>the questions heading into this session is will the House

185
00:10:11.559 --> 00:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to be that moderating force? And I think a

186
00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people supporting Cook want it to not

187
00:10:17.159 --> 00:10:20.039
<v Speaker 1>be and sort of want those sort of guardrails taken off,

188
00:10:20.399 --> 00:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they have reason to do that, right.

189
00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:27.279
<v Speaker 1>The body is a very conservative body. The Texas voters

190
00:10:27.559 --> 00:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have voted for very conservative candidates, and I think their

191
00:10:30.120 --> 00:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>argument is that agenda should be pushed through without any

192
00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>friction because they control that chamber.

193
00:10:35.840 --> 00:10:38.559
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And I think it's also important to remember that

194
00:10:38.639 --> 00:10:41.799
<v Speaker 5>I completely agree with the characterization of sort of the

195
00:10:42.399 --> 00:10:44.759
<v Speaker 5>two chambers. The House has been the more sort of

196
00:10:44.799 --> 00:10:48.159
<v Speaker 5>moderating body. But you know, even in over the last

197
00:10:48.200 --> 00:10:52.759
<v Speaker 5>couple legislative sessions where we've seen just this array of

198
00:10:52.919 --> 00:10:55.960
<v Speaker 5>conservative laws getting passed, I think, you know, even that

199
00:10:56.440 --> 00:10:59.360
<v Speaker 5>role for the House has started to diminish a little bit.

200
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:01.679
<v Speaker 5>And it sort of gets to the point that whether

201
00:11:01.759 --> 00:11:05.679
<v Speaker 5>it's Dustin Burrows, David Cook, or someone else, you know,

202
00:11:05.799 --> 00:11:07.440
<v Speaker 5>this is still gonna be It's still gonna be a

203
00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:10.840
<v Speaker 5>very conservative house. There's gonna be a lot of pressure

204
00:11:11.039 --> 00:11:14.360
<v Speaker 5>on you know, whether again, whether it's Burrows or whoever,

205
00:11:14.519 --> 00:11:18.039
<v Speaker 5>to you know, enact the priorities of kind of Governor

206
00:11:18.120 --> 00:11:18.720
<v Speaker 5>Dan Patrick.

207
00:11:19.440 --> 00:11:19.559
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

208
00:11:19.679 --> 00:11:22.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, Governor abbott Is has been pushing for a

209
00:11:22.440 --> 00:11:25.480
<v Speaker 5>private school voucher program pretty aggressively for the last couple

210
00:11:25.480 --> 00:11:27.799
<v Speaker 5>of years. So it's you know, it's we're not really

211
00:11:27.840 --> 00:11:30.720
<v Speaker 5>considering a situation where it's like, is the House going

212
00:11:30.799 --> 00:11:34.559
<v Speaker 5>to be, you know, super moderate versus you know, ultra conservative.

213
00:11:34.559 --> 00:11:37.200
<v Speaker 5>I think it's it's regardless of what happens, it's going

214
00:11:37.279 --> 00:11:40.240
<v Speaker 5>to be on the closer to the ultra conservative end.

215
00:11:40.639 --> 00:11:43.159
<v Speaker 5>What what really is up for debate is how much

216
00:11:43.200 --> 00:11:47.000
<v Speaker 5>power sharing there's gonna be with with Democrats and and

217
00:11:47.039 --> 00:11:49.759
<v Speaker 5>sort of also you're starting to get at this point, Matthew,

218
00:11:49.840 --> 00:11:53.320
<v Speaker 5>just the the kind of the influence of the Senate

219
00:11:53.519 --> 00:11:57.799
<v Speaker 5>in Dan Patrick over you know, the the way the

220
00:11:57.879 --> 00:12:01.039
<v Speaker 5>House operates. I think there is that is sort of

221
00:12:01.159 --> 00:12:04.159
<v Speaker 5>up for debate. Just's if it's David Cook or someone

222
00:12:04.600 --> 00:12:07.440
<v Speaker 5>from the wing of the party that supports David Cook.

223
00:12:07.600 --> 00:12:10.039
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think the feeling is that Dan Patrick

224
00:12:10.080 --> 00:12:13.159
<v Speaker 5>will have a much easier time getting his way on

225
00:12:13.399 --> 00:12:16.120
<v Speaker 5>and that does mean a lot more conservative legislation. But

226
00:12:16.159 --> 00:12:19.879
<v Speaker 5>there are also things that you know, his for example,

227
00:12:19.919 --> 00:12:24.600
<v Speaker 5>he has voiced his view that he wants to ban

228
00:12:25.799 --> 00:12:28.759
<v Speaker 5>THHD in Texas. You know, that doesn't fall neatly along

229
00:12:29.279 --> 00:12:33.559
<v Speaker 5>partisan or even conservative and moderate lines necessarily, So I

230
00:12:33.559 --> 00:12:37.440
<v Speaker 5>think that is. It's sort of the democratic power sharing

231
00:12:37.480 --> 00:12:40.240
<v Speaker 5>and also the independence of the House that's kind of

232
00:12:40.519 --> 00:12:41.279
<v Speaker 5>up for debate right now.

233
00:12:41.399 --> 00:12:44.039
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, But like you said, the key word, which is power, right, Like,

234
00:12:44.080 --> 00:12:46.039
<v Speaker 6>that's what this is all about. It's not really about

235
00:12:46.080 --> 00:12:48.919
<v Speaker 6>like who's more conservative who's less conservative, because the reality is,

236
00:12:49.440 --> 00:12:52.519
<v Speaker 6>you know, Lieutenant Governor Patrick sometimes does things that aren't

237
00:12:52.960 --> 00:12:59.159
<v Speaker 6>really associated with traditional Republican conservative ideology. I'm thinking back

238
00:12:59.200 --> 00:13:01.000
<v Speaker 6>to when there was a winner freeze and you try

239
00:13:01.039 --> 00:13:03.519
<v Speaker 6>to claw back all that money from the energy companies,

240
00:13:03.559 --> 00:13:09.159
<v Speaker 6>Like that doesn't fall neatly into traditional conservative lines of thinking,

241
00:13:09.240 --> 00:13:11.440
<v Speaker 6>and a lot of it, like getting involved in THHC

242
00:13:11.519 --> 00:13:14.759
<v Speaker 6>that also doesn't like really fall in line with conservatives.

243
00:13:14.840 --> 00:13:18.440
<v Speaker 6>There's this sort of new conservative of like we are

244
00:13:18.440 --> 00:13:22.279
<v Speaker 6>the conservatives, and we say who what conservatism is, which

245
00:13:22.279 --> 00:13:24.960
<v Speaker 6>goes up all the way to President Trump to a

246
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:28.399
<v Speaker 6>certain extent to Governor Abbott. There's no like real rules

247
00:13:28.399 --> 00:13:31.559
<v Speaker 6>of what conservative is. So they say, we are the conservatives,

248
00:13:31.559 --> 00:13:34.159
<v Speaker 6>and if you are not doing what we're doing or

249
00:13:34.159 --> 00:13:36.320
<v Speaker 6>what we want you to do, then you are not

250
00:13:36.360 --> 00:13:39.639
<v Speaker 6>conservative enough. And I think that's what the traditional Republican

251
00:13:39.679 --> 00:13:42.320
<v Speaker 6>faction is arguing about. They're saying, like, we're actually the

252
00:13:42.360 --> 00:13:45.600
<v Speaker 6>real Republicans, we actually have ideology that we've been following

253
00:13:45.639 --> 00:13:48.200
<v Speaker 6>since the eighties, and you guys are just making up

254
00:13:48.240 --> 00:13:50.360
<v Speaker 6>new rules. One of the things that you hear a

255
00:13:50.360 --> 00:13:54.600
<v Speaker 6>lot with the Cook supporters is it's not really about feeling.

256
00:13:54.639 --> 00:13:56.879
<v Speaker 6>It's not really about Strauss, it's not really about Burrows.

257
00:13:57.200 --> 00:14:01.480
<v Speaker 6>It's about the members being able to drive the conversation.

258
00:14:01.759 --> 00:14:04.159
<v Speaker 6>And literally everybody says that, you know, Dennis Bonden said

259
00:14:04.159 --> 00:14:06.799
<v Speaker 6>that when he came in, Felan said that, and to

260
00:14:06.840 --> 00:14:10.320
<v Speaker 6>a certain extent, Felan let the members drive the conversation.

261
00:14:11.720 --> 00:14:14.639
<v Speaker 6>So it's just interesting to see this. But it's all

262
00:14:14.840 --> 00:14:18.039
<v Speaker 6>really about power. I mean, it's not really about who's

263
00:14:18.080 --> 00:14:19.679
<v Speaker 6>more conservative or less conservative.

264
00:14:19.679 --> 00:14:20.639
<v Speaker 4>It's who has the power.

265
00:14:20.679 --> 00:14:22.879
<v Speaker 6>And if you look, sorry Eleanor, but if you look,

266
00:14:23.120 --> 00:14:25.279
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the people who are backing Cook are

267
00:14:25.320 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 6>people who don't have a lot of power. I mean,

268
00:14:28.240 --> 00:14:30.879
<v Speaker 6>there's some chairman in there, of course, and they have

269
00:14:31.000 --> 00:14:33.559
<v Speaker 6>valid reasons, i'm sure, for supporting Cook, but it's a

270
00:14:33.559 --> 00:14:39.360
<v Speaker 6>lot of new either freshmen or sophomore legislators who aren't

271
00:14:39.360 --> 00:14:40.960
<v Speaker 6>going to have the power because of seniority.

272
00:14:41.000 --> 00:14:42.960
<v Speaker 4>If you look at Burrows this it's people.

273
00:14:42.720 --> 00:14:44.679
<v Speaker 6>Who are chairmen who've been there a long time and

274
00:14:44.679 --> 00:14:46.639
<v Speaker 6>who are invested in maintaining that power.

275
00:14:46.840 --> 00:14:49.320
<v Speaker 5>And I think one other way to look at this

276
00:14:49.360 --> 00:14:51.279
<v Speaker 5>and kind of illustrate the point you're making is just

277
00:14:51.320 --> 00:14:56.240
<v Speaker 5>the ideological range of members who are supporting the two candidates.

278
00:14:56.279 --> 00:14:59.720
<v Speaker 5>There are tons of super conservative members who are supporting

279
00:14:59.759 --> 00:15:02.240
<v Speaker 5>bur and there are a bunch of you know, folks

280
00:15:02.240 --> 00:15:04.519
<v Speaker 5>who fall on the more moderate or maybe you know,

281
00:15:04.559 --> 00:15:07.240
<v Speaker 5>sort of establishment side of the party who are who

282
00:15:07.279 --> 00:15:11.519
<v Speaker 5>are supporting David Cook. So it's it's not neatly divided,

283
00:15:12.679 --> 00:15:15.039
<v Speaker 5>you know, down the middle ideologically.

284
00:15:15.440 --> 00:15:16.799
<v Speaker 3>And it seems like this is sort of like an

285
00:15:16.799 --> 00:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>inevitability of politics. So because like we're talking about like

286
00:15:20.720 --> 00:15:24.279
<v Speaker 3>really splitting hairs of conservatism, right like, there are very few,

287
00:15:25.399 --> 00:15:27.000
<v Speaker 3>like like you said, this is not a question of

288
00:15:27.039 --> 00:15:29.039
<v Speaker 3>are we gonna have a very liberal session or a

289
00:15:29.120 --> 00:15:31.960
<v Speaker 3>very conservative session. And it sort of speaks like you

290
00:15:31.960 --> 00:15:36.080
<v Speaker 3>cannot really have one party in dominant power without eventually

291
00:15:36.120 --> 00:15:39.600
<v Speaker 3>having like schisms within that. So it seems like the

292
00:15:40.240 --> 00:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>impeachment of at traditional Kin Paxson was like sort of

293
00:15:43.399 --> 00:15:46.279
<v Speaker 3>a watershed moment for that, which is like we're gonna

294
00:15:46.320 --> 00:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>have two We're have two sides fighting each other. They

295
00:15:49.279 --> 00:15:52.759
<v Speaker 3>agree ideologically on almost everything, but you have to have

296
00:15:52.799 --> 00:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>a schism.

297
00:15:53.720 --> 00:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course David Cook voted for the impeachment of

298
00:15:57.279 --> 00:16:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Kim Paxon, even though now Paxson is now out in

299
00:16:00.840 --> 00:16:04.679
<v Speaker 1>this state campaign four Cook, which I think is just

300
00:16:04.720 --> 00:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty fascinating. I mean, I'm I got to say, I'm

301
00:16:07.200 --> 00:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>really struck by and I think James and Jasper the

302
00:16:10.799 --> 00:16:14.519
<v Speaker 1>what you just described about power maybe answers the question

303
00:16:14.600 --> 00:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that has been going on in my head, which is

304
00:16:17.039 --> 00:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the pressure against these Burrows and previously feeling supporters has

305
00:16:22.480 --> 00:16:26.639
<v Speaker 1>been so intense. You know, we just saw a blood

306
00:16:26.639 --> 00:16:29.919
<v Speaker 1>bath in the Republican primary last year where members were

307
00:16:29.960 --> 00:16:32.399
<v Speaker 1>just wiped out. They had so much spinning against them,

308
00:16:32.600 --> 00:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>even the ones who one felt like there were lies

309
00:16:35.399 --> 00:16:38.279
<v Speaker 1>being told about them in the primary. It's very just

310
00:16:38.399 --> 00:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable to be in that situation when there's a bunch

311
00:16:41.799 --> 00:16:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of money coming against you. I mean, I think it's

312
00:16:46.840 --> 00:16:49.759
<v Speaker 1>a pretty safe bet at this point unless something happens

313
00:16:49.799 --> 00:16:51.919
<v Speaker 1>between now and Tuesday, that there's going to be an

314
00:16:51.919 --> 00:16:55.519
<v Speaker 1>effort to remove each of those vote members from the ballot.

315
00:16:55.559 --> 00:16:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Like I think we will see that attempt happen. And

316
00:16:59.200 --> 00:17:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're really in their political stake up for

317
00:17:03.000 --> 00:17:08.759
<v Speaker 1>grabs here putting four sort of splitting of hairs of conservativism.

318
00:17:08.839 --> 00:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And maybe the answer is just there's only so many

319
00:17:11.319 --> 00:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>positions of power in the House, and when you have one,

320
00:17:13.759 --> 00:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're in with the person who's in control, it's

321
00:17:17.200 --> 00:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to fight to keep that.

322
00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think, I mean, thinking ahead to the twenty

323
00:17:21.519 --> 00:17:24.720
<v Speaker 5>twenty six primaries, I think it will sort of serve

324
00:17:24.720 --> 00:17:28.359
<v Speaker 5>as the ultimate test of you know, how is it possible,

325
00:17:28.799 --> 00:17:31.519
<v Speaker 5>you know, sort of testing the limits of how much

326
00:17:32.000 --> 00:17:36.039
<v Speaker 5>you know these kind of typically what has historically been

327
00:17:36.079 --> 00:17:40.279
<v Speaker 5>an internal battle. You know, the House speakers race traditionally

328
00:17:40.359 --> 00:17:43.200
<v Speaker 5>is a member to member thing that you know, that

329
00:17:43.319 --> 00:17:46.519
<v Speaker 5>the public only finds out about after the facts. So

330
00:17:46.680 --> 00:17:49.680
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty six will really test just the you know,

331
00:17:49.759 --> 00:17:53.799
<v Speaker 5>how the public's appetite, the ability of the folks on

332
00:17:54.200 --> 00:17:57.799
<v Speaker 5>the right to you know, make this a central component

333
00:17:57.920 --> 00:18:01.480
<v Speaker 5>of these primary campaigns. And they you know, they've they've

334
00:18:01.519 --> 00:18:04.759
<v Speaker 5>been trying to do this generally for for the past decade,

335
00:18:04.799 --> 00:18:08.200
<v Speaker 5>but it has gotten into such a degree of hair

336
00:18:08.240 --> 00:18:11.920
<v Speaker 5>splitting that they've sort of been fishing for for issues

337
00:18:11.960 --> 00:18:15.119
<v Speaker 5>to you know, include on their on their campaign mailers

338
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:18.920
<v Speaker 5>and sort of accuse the you know, alleged Rhinos of

339
00:18:18.920 --> 00:18:22.920
<v Speaker 5>of not supporting. So I think it's it's you know,

340
00:18:23.599 --> 00:18:25.680
<v Speaker 5>a lot of this is kind of inside baseball, as

341
00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:28.759
<v Speaker 5>James was saying, And you know, it's I think kind

342
00:18:28.799 --> 00:18:31.039
<v Speaker 5>of if if we do get a speaker, Burrows or

343
00:18:31.079 --> 00:18:34.039
<v Speaker 5>somebody who the the right wing of the party is

344
00:18:34.240 --> 00:18:36.839
<v Speaker 5>unhappy with, you know, they're of course going to be

345
00:18:36.839 --> 00:18:40.119
<v Speaker 5>going scorched earth against the you know, the members who

346
00:18:40.119 --> 00:18:42.759
<v Speaker 5>didn't vote the way they want to. But you know,

347
00:18:42.880 --> 00:18:45.279
<v Speaker 5>our our primary voter is going to be receptive to that.

348
00:18:45.319 --> 00:18:45.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure.

349
00:18:45.920 --> 00:18:47.359
<v Speaker 6>I do want to get into like whether we think

350
00:18:47.359 --> 00:18:49.400
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be Burrows or Cook, just because I

351
00:18:49.400 --> 00:18:50.640
<v Speaker 6>think that would be fun and I want to put

352
00:18:50.680 --> 00:18:53.319
<v Speaker 6>you guys on the spot. But I but I also, uh,

353
00:18:53.480 --> 00:18:55.039
<v Speaker 6>you know, I pushed back on that twenty twenty sixth

354
00:18:55.079 --> 00:18:57.759
<v Speaker 6>things just because you know, it's so far away. It's

355
00:18:57.759 --> 00:19:00.240
<v Speaker 6>so far away, it's like a year and a half way,

356
00:19:00.599 --> 00:19:03.720
<v Speaker 6>and that's like an eternity in politics, right. And then

357
00:19:03.759 --> 00:19:09.240
<v Speaker 6>also we have this whole session for lawmakers to really

358
00:19:09.240 --> 00:19:11.880
<v Speaker 6>try to pass conservative legislation to go back to their

359
00:19:12.200 --> 00:19:15.319
<v Speaker 6>constituents and say, look, this is actually conservative legislation, Like

360
00:19:15.559 --> 00:19:17.599
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't matter what everybody else says, Like this.

361
00:19:17.519 --> 00:19:18.519
<v Speaker 4>Is what we're passing, right.

362
00:19:18.759 --> 00:19:21.720
<v Speaker 6>And I think the third thing that people are overlooking

363
00:19:21.799 --> 00:19:24.119
<v Speaker 6>is that in the last primary cycle, there was a

364
00:19:24.119 --> 00:19:27.119
<v Speaker 6>couple of things that converge to create that like really

365
00:19:27.279 --> 00:19:29.960
<v Speaker 6>crazy storm for a lot of these incumbent Republicans. It's

366
00:19:29.960 --> 00:19:33.200
<v Speaker 6>the things that you talked about Paxston getting impeached that

367
00:19:33.240 --> 00:19:37.200
<v Speaker 6>really catalyzed the right wing of the party. School vouchers

368
00:19:37.240 --> 00:19:40.240
<v Speaker 6>not passing that really catalyzed, and so it was Paxton

369
00:19:40.480 --> 00:19:44.400
<v Speaker 6>and Abbot sniping their own Republican fellows. I don't see

370
00:19:44.400 --> 00:19:46.200
<v Speaker 6>that happening because I think we are going to see

371
00:19:46.240 --> 00:19:49.599
<v Speaker 6>school vouchers pass this session. I think the Republicans feel

372
00:19:49.640 --> 00:19:52.240
<v Speaker 6>that pressure and they know that they've got to pass something,

373
00:19:52.480 --> 00:19:55.400
<v Speaker 6>and so I just don't see that same storm coming.

374
00:19:55.839 --> 00:19:58.799
<v Speaker 6>And so if then you take Abbot out of the

375
00:19:58.839 --> 00:20:02.640
<v Speaker 6>equation and potentially and potentially have Abbot backing you as

376
00:20:02.640 --> 00:20:06.599
<v Speaker 6>a school about your supporter, that really really changes the equation.

377
00:20:06.960 --> 00:20:09.119
<v Speaker 6>And when Abba gets involved on the side of the

378
00:20:09.160 --> 00:20:12.160
<v Speaker 6>traditional Republicans, it's a completely different game, and I think

379
00:20:12.200 --> 00:20:13.480
<v Speaker 6>that's a calculation they're making.

380
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right.

381
00:20:14.799 --> 00:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well let's do this then, James, you wanted to say, Oh,

382
00:20:17.759 --> 00:20:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that's yea Burrows. I'm not going to ask for a

383
00:20:20.839 --> 00:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>prediction because I don't I don't know if we need

384
00:20:22.920 --> 00:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to make predictions. But let's hear from the three of

385
00:20:25.720 --> 00:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>y'all on who the who you think the favorite is

386
00:20:28.319 --> 00:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>right now at eleven twenty four on Friday.

387
00:20:31.519 --> 00:20:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think just I mean it's got to be Burrows.

388
00:20:34.039 --> 00:20:36.839
<v Speaker 5>Just sort of reading some of the tea leaves lately,

389
00:20:36.839 --> 00:20:38.920
<v Speaker 5>and part of the reason I have twenty twenty six

390
00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:42.119
<v Speaker 5>on my mind is just at some of these campaign

391
00:20:42.200 --> 00:20:44.440
<v Speaker 5>stops that that Ken Paxson has been making over the

392
00:20:44.480 --> 00:20:47.880
<v Speaker 5>last few days, going around to try to pressure, you know,

393
00:20:48.759 --> 00:20:51.599
<v Speaker 5>hold out house members to get behind Cook. You know,

394
00:20:51.640 --> 00:20:54.519
<v Speaker 5>you sort of heard some of the language there has

395
00:20:54.640 --> 00:20:57.680
<v Speaker 5>they you know, has been we think we're going to win,

396
00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:00.319
<v Speaker 5>but if we don't, you know, these these guys are

397
00:21:00.319 --> 00:21:02.920
<v Speaker 5>in trouble in twenty twenty six. So I think, just

398
00:21:02.960 --> 00:21:05.119
<v Speaker 5>sort of again trying to read the tea leaves there,

399
00:21:05.279 --> 00:21:07.519
<v Speaker 5>you know, it feels like the groundwork is maybe being

400
00:21:07.599 --> 00:21:10.599
<v Speaker 5>laid a little bit for if things go the way

401
00:21:10.599 --> 00:21:13.880
<v Speaker 5>of Dustin Burroughs on Tuesday, I think also just looking

402
00:21:13.920 --> 00:21:18.400
<v Speaker 5>at the coalition that Burrow's put together in his initial list,

403
00:21:18.480 --> 00:21:21.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, he has lost some members from that list.

404
00:21:21.440 --> 00:21:24.680
<v Speaker 5>You know, we haven't seen a public you know, list

405
00:21:24.720 --> 00:21:27.200
<v Speaker 5>of supporters from him over the last month or so.

406
00:21:27.400 --> 00:21:30.480
<v Speaker 5>But I do think just looking at the sheer math

407
00:21:30.519 --> 00:21:33.640
<v Speaker 5>of it, you know, David Cook is trying to get

408
00:21:33.680 --> 00:21:37.759
<v Speaker 5>to seventy six votes through a route that doesn't really

409
00:21:37.880 --> 00:21:41.400
<v Speaker 5>give Democrats a lot of obvious reasons to support him.

410
00:21:41.440 --> 00:21:44.759
<v Speaker 5>You know, his whole kind of platform is predicated on

411
00:21:45.359 --> 00:21:49.440
<v Speaker 5>eliminating power sharing, you know, all sorts of changes that

412
00:21:49.839 --> 00:21:52.720
<v Speaker 5>if I'm if I'm a Democratic lawmaker, I'm probably going

413
00:21:52.799 --> 00:21:55.839
<v Speaker 5>to be looking elsewhere first. And so Burrows just has

414
00:21:55.920 --> 00:21:59.440
<v Speaker 5>a much easier path to go compared to David.

415
00:21:59.319 --> 00:21:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Cook at this point.

416
00:22:00.960 --> 00:22:05.319
<v Speaker 6>James, Okay, well, Jasper stole all my lines, So no,

417
00:22:05.400 --> 00:22:06.880
<v Speaker 6>I would say I would agree with that. I mean,

418
00:22:06.920 --> 00:22:09.279
<v Speaker 6>I think I've shared this with you guys. I think

419
00:22:09.319 --> 00:22:12.119
<v Speaker 6>that Burrows is in pole position just because, like if

420
00:22:12.160 --> 00:22:14.480
<v Speaker 6>you just look at the lists, he's got the highest number.

421
00:22:14.559 --> 00:22:16.359
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's not seventy six. We know that for sure,

422
00:22:16.599 --> 00:22:18.680
<v Speaker 6>but it's still higher than the fifty six.

423
00:22:18.839 --> 00:22:19.359
<v Speaker 4>Fifty seven.

424
00:22:19.400 --> 00:22:21.319
<v Speaker 6>Then we saw David Cook put out at his highest.

425
00:22:21.599 --> 00:22:26.519
<v Speaker 6>His watermark is fifty six. Even Burrows after losing the

426
00:22:26.640 --> 00:22:29.960
<v Speaker 6>seven people he lost, is still higher than fifty six, right,

427
00:22:30.279 --> 00:22:33.519
<v Speaker 6>And so I think the other thing too is we

428
00:22:33.640 --> 00:22:36.119
<v Speaker 6>have to talk about the role of Democrats, right and

429
00:22:36.279 --> 00:22:39.400
<v Speaker 6>the role of like these squishy Republicans who maybe are

430
00:22:39.440 --> 00:22:42.839
<v Speaker 6>on both lists, who are trying to figure out if

431
00:22:42.880 --> 00:22:45.559
<v Speaker 6>they want to be in power, who's the guy that's

432
00:22:45.599 --> 00:22:48.160
<v Speaker 6>going or gal who's going to get them to be

433
00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:52.319
<v Speaker 6>in power? And you're on if you feel like you're

434
00:22:52.319 --> 00:22:54.279
<v Speaker 6>on sinking ships, like neither one of them is going

435
00:22:54.319 --> 00:22:56.759
<v Speaker 6>to get to seventy six, which some of these folks

436
00:22:56.880 --> 00:22:59.119
<v Speaker 6>do feel like. We've seen the letters from Gary Gates.

437
00:23:00.319 --> 00:23:02.920
<v Speaker 6>They're looking for a third option, and they've been looking

438
00:23:02.920 --> 00:23:05.599
<v Speaker 6>for a third option for a while. And there's that

439
00:23:05.799 --> 00:23:09.480
<v Speaker 6>uncommitted group of Democrats who are neither Cook nor Burroughs,

440
00:23:09.599 --> 00:23:11.799
<v Speaker 6>and they're trying to figure out, can we build a coalition,

441
00:23:11.920 --> 00:23:14.319
<v Speaker 6>can we pull from these other coalitions to build our

442
00:23:14.359 --> 00:23:17.400
<v Speaker 6>own coalition so that we are in power. I think

443
00:23:17.400 --> 00:23:20.400
<v Speaker 6>that's still an interesting thing to look at. But like

444
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:23.799
<v Speaker 6>I said, I think it's Boroughs third candidate and then Cook.

445
00:23:23.960 --> 00:23:26.079
<v Speaker 6>But I do think that the ironic thing in all

446
00:23:26.079 --> 00:23:29.079
<v Speaker 6>of this is that these two guys who are fighting

447
00:23:29.079 --> 00:23:34.079
<v Speaker 6>to be the more conservative Republican, the conservative choice for speaker,

448
00:23:34.400 --> 00:23:36.680
<v Speaker 6>are going to have to rely on Democratic votes and

449
00:23:36.680 --> 00:23:38.359
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be interesting to see like how exactly

450
00:23:38.440 --> 00:23:39.559
<v Speaker 6>they go about getting those.

451
00:23:39.720 --> 00:23:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Owner Are you going to be a contrarian?

452
00:23:41.359 --> 00:23:44.519
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I will, I'll make the case for you know.

453
00:23:44.559 --> 00:23:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think the main thing is, like we is,

454
00:23:47.079 --> 00:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>we've got a lot of people who are on both

455
00:23:48.519 --> 00:23:50.119
<v Speaker 3>sides of this that are sort of just trying to

456
00:23:50.119 --> 00:23:53.359
<v Speaker 3>predict accurately where the power goes. So I do think

457
00:23:53.359 --> 00:23:57.319
<v Speaker 3>there is a chance that this, you know, a sort

458
00:23:57.319 --> 00:24:00.279
<v Speaker 3>of the fear campaign that's being lodged against some these

459
00:24:00.279 --> 00:24:03.599
<v Speaker 3>members takes hold. You just need, like the numbers are

460
00:24:03.640 --> 00:24:05.279
<v Speaker 3>so small that you really do just need like a

461
00:24:05.319 --> 00:24:08.039
<v Speaker 3>few people to move in either direction. I do think

462
00:24:08.079 --> 00:24:10.839
<v Speaker 3>it's also possible that we have, you know, a third candidate,

463
00:24:10.839 --> 00:24:13.279
<v Speaker 3>that someone else emerges, that this all like becomes sort

464
00:24:13.319 --> 00:24:17.319
<v Speaker 3>of all this like back and forth becomes irrelevant. But

465
00:24:17.400 --> 00:24:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I kind of think, and I guess it's a question

466
00:24:19.200 --> 00:24:21.880
<v Speaker 3>for you guys. But like, regardless, the fact that they

467
00:24:22.119 --> 00:24:24.559
<v Speaker 3>sort of I mean, it's reminiscent of the House Speaker

468
00:24:24.599 --> 00:24:27.400
<v Speaker 3>vote in Congress. Like the fact that they can't agree

469
00:24:27.400 --> 00:24:31.680
<v Speaker 3>on this first question does sort of set up a

470
00:24:31.759 --> 00:24:35.480
<v Speaker 3>potentially very painful, drawn out session.

471
00:24:35.680 --> 00:24:37.720
<v Speaker 6>And I'm curious, like how long that first day is

472
00:24:37.839 --> 00:24:39.559
<v Speaker 6>gonna go. The other thing we have to say is

473
00:24:39.640 --> 00:24:41.599
<v Speaker 6>that there is officially a third candidate, which is Anna

474
00:24:41.599 --> 00:24:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Maria Ramos, who hasn't dropped out, and she's got her vote,

475
00:24:44.200 --> 00:24:46.519
<v Speaker 6>and then as of this morning, she has Ray Lopez.

476
00:24:46.519 --> 00:24:48.720
<v Speaker 6>So that's two votes for Anna Maria Ramos, have to

477
00:24:48.720 --> 00:24:51.599
<v Speaker 6>say it, but there's other Republicans still kind of floating

478
00:24:51.640 --> 00:24:54.000
<v Speaker 6>about in there. But yeah, I'm curious, like how long

479
00:24:54.000 --> 00:24:55.319
<v Speaker 6>this thing is going to go, if we're going to

480
00:24:55.400 --> 00:24:58.599
<v Speaker 6>have like multiple votes, or if it's going to wrap

481
00:24:58.680 --> 00:24:59.920
<v Speaker 6>up pretty easily.

482
00:25:00.079 --> 00:25:02.000
<v Speaker 4>And also, just like the session at large.

483
00:25:01.759 --> 00:25:05.240
<v Speaker 5>I do think the point about the Democrats though, is

484
00:25:05.599 --> 00:25:09.119
<v Speaker 5>that could be maybe the it might be the leading

485
00:25:09.160 --> 00:25:13.039
<v Speaker 5>contender as sort of the factor that could upend Dustin

486
00:25:13.039 --> 00:25:17.359
<v Speaker 5>Burrows's chances. If the Democrats, you know, just come out

487
00:25:17.359 --> 00:25:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Tuesday totally fractured, you've got the the you know, I

488
00:25:21.200 --> 00:25:23.680
<v Speaker 5>don't know the exact number of folks who are you know,

489
00:25:23.720 --> 00:25:25.720
<v Speaker 5>planning to go to the to the mat, go to

490
00:25:25.759 --> 00:25:28.960
<v Speaker 5>the floor casting their vote for for Anna Maria Ramos,

491
00:25:29.000 --> 00:25:31.359
<v Speaker 5>even knowing that she doesn't have the math to win.

492
00:25:31.759 --> 00:25:36.720
<v Speaker 5>There's also sort of another faction of House Democrats, you know,

493
00:25:36.960 --> 00:25:40.359
<v Speaker 5>apparently led by Sinfronia Thompson, one of the longest serving

494
00:25:40.720 --> 00:25:43.319
<v Speaker 5>members in the House, who who has been through a

495
00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:45.440
<v Speaker 5>whole lot of speaker races in her time, so, you know,

496
00:25:45.680 --> 00:25:48.240
<v Speaker 5>assuming she knows what she's doing, she's also kind of

497
00:25:48.279 --> 00:25:52.240
<v Speaker 5>leading the Burroughs like sort of the holdout members who

498
00:25:52.240 --> 00:25:54.680
<v Speaker 5>are keeping their powder dry. And then, you know, the

499
00:25:54.680 --> 00:25:57.480
<v Speaker 5>biggest faction of Democrats as of now at least are

500
00:25:57.519 --> 00:26:01.079
<v Speaker 5>the ones who are publicly supporting Burroughs. You know, there

501
00:26:01.119 --> 00:26:04.200
<v Speaker 5>might be some crossover between the Sinfernia Thompson Onno Maria

502
00:26:04.279 --> 00:26:06.839
<v Speaker 5>Ramos Camp's not sure, but it's you know, if.

503
00:26:06.720 --> 00:26:08.000
<v Speaker 4>If that's the same camp.

504
00:26:08.119 --> 00:26:11.559
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but if it's you know that that if it's

505
00:26:11.599 --> 00:26:15.240
<v Speaker 5>evenly divided or even there's you know, uh, you know,

506
00:26:15.799 --> 00:26:17.559
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure exactly how the math works out, but

507
00:26:17.599 --> 00:26:20.640
<v Speaker 5>just enough Democrats who aren't willing to support Burrows, and

508
00:26:21.000 --> 00:26:24.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, the pressure campaign against the Republican members causes

509
00:26:25.079 --> 00:26:28.200
<v Speaker 5>enough to hold out that could sink him, and then

510
00:26:28.279 --> 00:26:30.559
<v Speaker 5>you know, the Borough's supporters have to look to someone else.

511
00:26:30.799 --> 00:26:32.519
<v Speaker 1>There's one other thing I just want to bring up,

512
00:26:32.559 --> 00:26:36.599
<v Speaker 1>which I was sort of skeptical of the Borough's path

513
00:26:36.720 --> 00:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because of the pressure.

514
00:26:37.880 --> 00:26:40.000
<v Speaker 6>But I will say, and because a lot of Democrats

515
00:26:40.279 --> 00:26:42.079
<v Speaker 6>hate him, like there's a lot of animals.

516
00:26:42.039 --> 00:26:44.319
<v Speaker 4>Not really like ally meaningful allies.

517
00:26:44.400 --> 00:26:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Yet I will say, you know, I mentioned the Alex

518
00:26:46.920 --> 00:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Fairley money earlier here, twenty million dollars that he said.

519
00:26:51.400 --> 00:26:54.319
<v Speaker 1>He's he's a Marilla businessman. He's sort of a new

520
00:26:54.519 --> 00:26:58.559
<v Speaker 1>player in the like Megadna worlds of Texas, particularly kind

521
00:26:58.559 --> 00:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of perceived on that like hard line right. He put

522
00:27:01.200 --> 00:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>out that he was going to spend twenty million in

523
00:27:02.640 --> 00:27:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the next primary to quote expand and you know a

524
00:27:05.839 --> 00:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>real conservative majority.

525
00:27:08.000 --> 00:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>I think I'll speak for myself.

526
00:27:10.440 --> 00:27:13.599
<v Speaker 1>I saw that as a sort of implicit threat against

527
00:27:13.599 --> 00:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>people voting for Burroughs. He put out a statement like

528
00:27:16.279 --> 00:27:20.319
<v Speaker 1>right before we came in to record this where it

529
00:27:20.359 --> 00:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>seemed like the tone had shifted a little bit. He

530
00:27:22.160 --> 00:27:25.039
<v Speaker 1>said the speaker should be elected with a majority of

531
00:27:25.119 --> 00:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Republicans supporting him or her, which right, and did not

532
00:27:33.000 --> 00:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>mention the caucus endorsement at all. And he said the

533
00:27:35.759 --> 00:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>fund will not primary members based solely on their speaker vote.

534
00:27:40.240 --> 00:27:44.319
<v Speaker 6>And that felt a little different from what the Republican

535
00:27:44.359 --> 00:27:45.240
<v Speaker 6>Party of Texas.

536
00:27:45.000 --> 00:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Is exactly, And that felt a little bit almost like

537
00:27:49.920 --> 00:27:52.079
<v Speaker 1>like someone people can read that and view that as

538
00:27:52.119 --> 00:27:56.519
<v Speaker 1>permission to vote for Burroughs or a third candidate in

539
00:27:56.559 --> 00:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>this way. And I think that's meaningful because twenty million

540
00:27:59.119 --> 00:28:00.839
<v Speaker 1>dollars is a lot of money. That's more than Abbot

541
00:28:00.920 --> 00:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was spinning in the past primary. And if you feel

542
00:28:04.480 --> 00:28:06.759
<v Speaker 1>like that money is not going to be used against you,

543
00:28:07.319 --> 00:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that might make you feel a little bit more.

544
00:28:08.880 --> 00:28:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Comfortab It's a notable tone change.

545
00:28:10.519 --> 00:28:12.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I'd put that in the category of the

546
00:28:12.440 --> 00:28:14.640
<v Speaker 5>tea leaves that make me think Burrows is maybe the

547
00:28:15.279 --> 00:28:16.440
<v Speaker 5>favorite as of right now.

548
00:28:16.519 --> 00:28:19.279
<v Speaker 6>Yea, all right, let's pause a disclosure that this is

549
00:28:19.279 --> 00:28:21.119
<v Speaker 6>all pre recorded on Friday.

550
00:28:20.839 --> 00:28:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Right right, exactly.

551
00:28:22.599 --> 00:28:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of disclosures, let's pause and hear from our sponsors

552
00:28:26.359 --> 00:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>for today's show. Public schools are at the center of

553
00:28:29.440 --> 00:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>our democracy. Raise your hand. Texas believes through equity and innovation.

554
00:28:33.559 --> 00:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>We can create a world class school system that fuels

555
00:28:36.640 --> 00:28:39.799
<v Speaker 1>a brighter future for all Texans. Learn more at Raise

556
00:28:39.799 --> 00:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>your Hand Texas dot org, slash get dash involved. Water grows,

557
00:28:46.319 --> 00:28:50.079
<v Speaker 1>our food, our economy, and our future. Discover how Texas

558
00:28:50.079 --> 00:28:53.559
<v Speaker 1>farmers make strides to make water last for Texans now

559
00:28:53.599 --> 00:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and generations to come more at Watergrows dot org. All right,

560
00:28:58.759 --> 00:29:02.599
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some Paul here. Vouchers is the big

561
00:29:02.599 --> 00:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ticket item. We talked about the primaries. Many of those

562
00:29:07.720 --> 00:29:12.279
<v Speaker 1>primary defeats of Republicans were people who voted against vouchers

563
00:29:12.319 --> 00:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and drew the attention and the considerable financial resources of

564
00:29:17.000 --> 00:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg Abbott. We're somewhere, you know, the back of the envelope.

565
00:29:21.400 --> 00:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Math is sort of like we're around like seventy nine

566
00:29:24.160 --> 00:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>voucher supporters right now.

567
00:29:26.319 --> 00:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Is this a sure thing?

568
00:29:29.920 --> 00:29:30.799
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so.

569
00:29:30.880 --> 00:29:33.759
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's it's I think we're heading into the

570
00:29:33.759 --> 00:29:38.880
<v Speaker 5>session with you know, vouchers or education savings accounts, the

571
00:29:39.000 --> 00:29:41.759
<v Speaker 5>kind of voucher like policy that's being proposed. I think

572
00:29:41.799 --> 00:29:45.200
<v Speaker 5>it has its best shot of passing maybe ever, at

573
00:29:45.279 --> 00:29:49.279
<v Speaker 5>least in decades. But at the same time, you know,

574
00:29:49.359 --> 00:29:52.720
<v Speaker 5>the official or I guess unofficial whip count that's being

575
00:29:52.759 --> 00:29:56.839
<v Speaker 5>thrown around in the House is seventy nine votes. Who

576
00:29:56.920 --> 00:29:59.640
<v Speaker 5>you know members who would support some sort of voucher

577
00:29:59.680 --> 00:30:02.559
<v Speaker 5>program if it hits the floor. You know, the big

578
00:30:02.599 --> 00:30:05.799
<v Speaker 5>caveat there is that a whole lot of those members

579
00:30:05.839 --> 00:30:09.240
<v Speaker 5>are not on record saying what type of voucher program

580
00:30:09.279 --> 00:30:12.799
<v Speaker 5>they would support. And when you pair that with just

581
00:30:13.279 --> 00:30:16.200
<v Speaker 5>how slim that margin is, you know, you're only three

582
00:30:16.279 --> 00:30:19.920
<v Speaker 5>votes past the number you need to reach majority in

583
00:30:19.920 --> 00:30:24.799
<v Speaker 5>the House. I think it's, you know, the smart money

584
00:30:24.799 --> 00:30:29.319
<v Speaker 5>now is basically something is more likely to pass than not.

585
00:30:29.519 --> 00:30:34.319
<v Speaker 5>But nobody really knows what you know, format is acceptable

586
00:30:34.359 --> 00:30:37.119
<v Speaker 5>to a majority of House members, right, I.

587
00:30:37.119 --> 00:30:39.200
<v Speaker 6>Think it's I mean, nothing's for sure in the legislature,

588
00:30:39.200 --> 00:30:41.240
<v Speaker 6>but I think this is a pretty safe bet. As

589
00:30:41.279 --> 00:30:45.279
<v Speaker 6>Jasper put it, just because you saw what Governor Abbott

590
00:30:45.279 --> 00:30:48.200
<v Speaker 6>did in the primaries, you don't want to be facing

591
00:30:48.279 --> 00:30:52.119
<v Speaker 6>him again in the primaries next time around. He wants

592
00:30:52.160 --> 00:30:54.160
<v Speaker 6>to get something done. He's been very clear about that.

593
00:30:54.200 --> 00:30:56.359
<v Speaker 6>He's brought in a whole new batch of lawmakers who

594
00:30:56.440 --> 00:30:59.839
<v Speaker 6>want to get something done on school choice. It just

595
00:31:00.160 --> 00:31:02.880
<v Speaker 6>is a question of what that sort of voucher legislation

596
00:31:03.440 --> 00:31:05.319
<v Speaker 6>looks like and I think that's going to be a

597
00:31:05.319 --> 00:31:08.079
<v Speaker 6>sticking point, but I'm pretty sure it passes.

598
00:31:08.400 --> 00:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think like you, if you're David Cook and

599
00:31:10.720 --> 00:31:13.079
<v Speaker 1>you and Speaker, you're you know, I think going to

600
00:31:13.160 --> 00:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>be more aligned with Dan Patrick in the future, and

601
00:31:15.759 --> 00:31:18.079
<v Speaker 1>like it's a little bit more smooth sailing. If you're

602
00:31:18.319 --> 00:31:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Burrows or some other candidate, I think you probably politically

603
00:31:22.200 --> 00:31:25.079
<v Speaker 1>want to get Abbott as close to on your side

604
00:31:25.119 --> 00:31:28.319
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as possible, and probably the best way to

605
00:31:28.359 --> 00:31:30.599
<v Speaker 1>do that is to move a bill through and move

606
00:31:30.640 --> 00:31:32.799
<v Speaker 1>it through quickly so that we don't end up in

607
00:31:32.839 --> 00:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the situation we ended up in twenty two.

608
00:31:34.920 --> 00:31:37.359
<v Speaker 6>And Burrows I think has been supportive of school actually, right, Yeah,

609
00:31:37.480 --> 00:31:39.039
<v Speaker 6>so that's not an issue.

610
00:31:38.799 --> 00:31:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly.

611
00:31:39.680 --> 00:31:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what other issues are standing out to y'all in

612
00:31:43.079 --> 00:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the session? I'll start with you eleanor Well.

613
00:31:46.039 --> 00:31:48.119
<v Speaker 3>I as the women's health reporter, I got to make

614
00:31:48.200 --> 00:31:51.599
<v Speaker 3>a pitch for you know, twenty twenty three last session.

615
00:31:52.240 --> 00:31:54.599
<v Speaker 3>I joke, and this is very overstated, but that like

616
00:31:54.640 --> 00:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the word abortion was not said under the Capitol Dome

617
00:31:58.599 --> 00:32:00.400
<v Speaker 3>in the twenty twenty three session. It just like was

618
00:32:00.839 --> 00:32:03.200
<v Speaker 3>not touched at all, so, I obviously am watching to

619
00:32:03.200 --> 00:32:07.240
<v Speaker 3>see whether, you know, we've seen some momentum from conservatives

620
00:32:07.279 --> 00:32:10.519
<v Speaker 3>around trying to crack down further on abortion pills. We

621
00:32:10.599 --> 00:32:14.599
<v Speaker 3>see a couple bills that modeled after like a Louisiana

622
00:32:14.640 --> 00:32:19.400
<v Speaker 3>bill that makes abortion inducing drugs a controlled substance, a

623
00:32:19.440 --> 00:32:23.279
<v Speaker 3>couple like smaller things on that front. And then I'm

624
00:32:23.319 --> 00:32:27.519
<v Speaker 3>also watching after the election, where we saw so much conversation,

625
00:32:27.599 --> 00:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>particularly from conservatives about trans kids. Trans adults really was

626
00:32:34.000 --> 00:32:37.880
<v Speaker 3>seen as like a very powerful tool during the election

627
00:32:38.559 --> 00:32:41.400
<v Speaker 3>for conservatives. I think we're expecting to see more bills.

628
00:32:43.640 --> 00:32:46.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, last session we saw a huge victory for

629
00:32:46.039 --> 00:32:49.799
<v Speaker 3>conservatives on this effort they've been pushing for a while

630
00:32:49.839 --> 00:32:52.759
<v Speaker 3>to ban gender firming care for minors. It's not yet

631
00:32:52.799 --> 00:32:55.559
<v Speaker 3>clear like what the next frontier is whether they're going

632
00:32:55.559 --> 00:32:58.599
<v Speaker 3>to sort of try to regulate trans adults lives or

633
00:32:58.680 --> 00:33:03.559
<v Speaker 3>further restrict sort of this care for trans miners, but

634
00:33:03.799 --> 00:33:06.759
<v Speaker 3>that probably will We'll see more conversation on that front

635
00:33:06.799 --> 00:33:07.759
<v Speaker 3>than on the abortion front.

636
00:33:07.920 --> 00:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you watched college football in the fall ahead

637
00:33:11.000 --> 00:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of the election, you know that that was maybe the

638
00:33:13.200 --> 00:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>most popular Republican ad in Texas and beyond and so

639
00:33:17.640 --> 00:33:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you got to think there's going to be something related

640
00:33:20.359 --> 00:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to that, you know, women's sports, trans kids, any of

641
00:33:24.160 --> 00:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>those types of things.

642
00:33:25.240 --> 00:33:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's tricky because Texas has done a lot of

643
00:33:27.680 --> 00:33:30.319
<v Speaker 3>that already. But every I mean there's a group out

644
00:33:30.319 --> 00:33:34.000
<v Speaker 3>there that tracks like anti trans legislation, and it's just

645
00:33:34.039 --> 00:33:37.039
<v Speaker 3>like the years Texas meets in the legislature, you can

646
00:33:37.079 --> 00:33:39.240
<v Speaker 3>see there's like a huge spike nationally and then the

647
00:33:39.279 --> 00:33:41.440
<v Speaker 3>years we don't meet, like other states are just not

648
00:33:41.519 --> 00:33:43.680
<v Speaker 3>doing nearly as much as we are on that front.

649
00:33:43.759 --> 00:33:45.240
<v Speaker 3>So they'll do something.

650
00:33:45.440 --> 00:33:46.519
<v Speaker 2>James, what's on your radar?

651
00:33:46.960 --> 00:33:50.920
<v Speaker 6>Social conservatives are in so more socially conservative legislation.

652
00:33:50.680 --> 00:33:53.039
<v Speaker 4>Ten Commandments bills, a lot of the trans bills.

653
00:33:53.240 --> 00:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Ten Commandments is requiring schools to hang them in the

654
00:33:56.039 --> 00:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>classroom walls.

655
00:33:56.960 --> 00:33:58.440
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah.

656
00:33:58.480 --> 00:34:02.079
<v Speaker 6>And then I think immigration is thing to watch. The

657
00:34:02.160 --> 00:34:05.880
<v Speaker 6>return of this question of banning whether cities and counties

658
00:34:05.920 --> 00:34:09.719
<v Speaker 6>can pay lobbyists to advocate on their behalf in Austin,

659
00:34:09.800 --> 00:34:12.800
<v Speaker 6>I think that's a big push my social conservatives.

660
00:34:14.880 --> 00:34:17.039
<v Speaker 4>And then I guess immigration is something to watch too.

661
00:34:17.079 --> 00:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean right, the big question is how much

662
00:34:19.960 --> 00:34:23.039
<v Speaker 1>does the state invest in immigration? And that Trump presidency.

663
00:34:23.639 --> 00:34:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean all of the above for sure.

664
00:34:25.480 --> 00:34:29.840
<v Speaker 5>I think also just looking at the the budget surplus

665
00:34:29.840 --> 00:34:34.440
<v Speaker 5>that we're expected to see for the second straight regular session,

666
00:34:34.440 --> 00:34:37.480
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be a sizeable, you know, share of

667
00:34:37.760 --> 00:34:41.320
<v Speaker 5>some billions of dollars. We don't have the official estimate

668
00:34:41.360 --> 00:34:44.159
<v Speaker 5>yet from the Comptroller, Glenn Hagar, but that's going to

669
00:34:44.199 --> 00:34:48.760
<v Speaker 5>be you know, doled out to presumably property tax cuts,

670
00:34:48.760 --> 00:34:52.239
<v Speaker 5>property tax relief of some sort. Just looking to see

671
00:34:53.119 --> 00:34:57.559
<v Speaker 5>how big that relief packages, and also whether the two

672
00:34:57.960 --> 00:35:01.159
<v Speaker 5>chambers can agree on what format takes or whether we

673
00:35:01.199 --> 00:35:06.159
<v Speaker 5>see a redux of the you know, endless, endless fighting

674
00:35:06.199 --> 00:35:10.039
<v Speaker 5>that led to multiple special sessions. I think also keeping

675
00:35:10.039 --> 00:35:12.880
<v Speaker 5>on the theme of the budget surplus, like water, infrastructure

676
00:35:12.960 --> 00:35:16.519
<v Speaker 5>is a big one, just continuing the investment made last

677
00:35:16.559 --> 00:35:20.440
<v Speaker 5>regular session to you know, fix the leaky pipes all

678
00:35:20.440 --> 00:35:24.760
<v Speaker 5>over the state and find new sources of water and

679
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:27.840
<v Speaker 5>just kind of infrastructure in general. You know, we spend

680
00:35:27.840 --> 00:35:31.079
<v Speaker 5>billions of dollars on highway expansion and just all kinds

681
00:35:31.119 --> 00:35:34.320
<v Speaker 5>of stuff that sort of flows under the radar of

682
00:35:34.360 --> 00:35:38.199
<v Speaker 5>these these charged political debates. But I think you know

683
00:35:38.280 --> 00:35:41.519
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the big issues will kind of flow

684
00:35:41.519 --> 00:35:44.480
<v Speaker 5>through that the budget surplus two we're talking about like

685
00:35:44.559 --> 00:35:48.599
<v Speaker 5>public school finance, you know, kind of parent that that

686
00:35:48.639 --> 00:35:53.199
<v Speaker 5>conversation is always just by nature paired with the voucher talk.

687
00:35:53.480 --> 00:35:58.679
<v Speaker 5>Just you know, how much gets spent on raises for teachers,

688
00:35:58.920 --> 00:36:01.840
<v Speaker 5>and you know, trying to shore up.

689
00:36:01.960 --> 00:36:04.760
<v Speaker 4>That issue, the workforce shortage.

690
00:36:04.480 --> 00:36:06.760
<v Speaker 5>In public schools. I think that's a big one. And

691
00:36:06.840 --> 00:36:09.079
<v Speaker 5>I guess the last one to flag would be the grid,

692
00:36:09.280 --> 00:36:12.039
<v Speaker 5>the power gridg just you know, Dan Patrick has said

693
00:36:12.079 --> 00:36:16.880
<v Speaker 5>he wants to continue providing the low interest loans to

694
00:36:16.960 --> 00:36:21.480
<v Speaker 5>incentivize the construction of new natural gas plants. So just

695
00:36:22.079 --> 00:36:26.119
<v Speaker 5>you know, whatever gets passed in that genre is hugely

696
00:36:26.119 --> 00:36:27.000
<v Speaker 5>important for the state.

697
00:36:27.199 --> 00:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Urkott really support late last year or middle of

698
00:36:30.760 --> 00:36:33.519
<v Speaker 1>last year, actually saying predicting demand on the grid going

699
00:36:33.599 --> 00:36:36.360
<v Speaker 1>up seventy five percent over the next six years. Anyone

700
00:36:36.440 --> 00:36:40.760
<v Speaker 1>who lived through twenty twenty one, that's a scary thing

701
00:36:40.800 --> 00:36:43.039
<v Speaker 1>to think about. I think the politicians of the state

702
00:36:43.079 --> 00:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>would really like to not have something like that happen again.

703
00:36:45.920 --> 00:36:48.159
<v Speaker 1>So I think you'll see some commitment there. I'll add

704
00:36:48.159 --> 00:36:52.280
<v Speaker 1>two more gambling not I don't think a lot of

705
00:36:52.320 --> 00:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>support for that in the Senate at least at the top,

706
00:36:54.519 --> 00:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of money being spent by lobbyists on

707
00:36:56.920 --> 00:36:59.079
<v Speaker 1>that one, So that'll be a fun one to watch.

708
00:36:59.119 --> 00:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And then THC marijuana. We talked about this already, Dan

709
00:37:02.400 --> 00:37:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Patrick coming out wanting to ban all those THHC products

710
00:37:05.679 --> 00:37:09.079
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of like marijuana, sort of being unregulated

711
00:37:09.239 --> 00:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and right now in the way that they're sold.

712
00:37:12.440 --> 00:37:14.280
<v Speaker 6>That was interesting too because Sid Miller kind of came

713
00:37:14.280 --> 00:37:16.840
<v Speaker 6>out against that, and there's obviously a lot of rural

714
00:37:16.920 --> 00:37:21.119
<v Speaker 6>lawmakers who's that's a big cash game for them in

715
00:37:21.159 --> 00:37:21.639
<v Speaker 6>their district.

716
00:37:21.800 --> 00:37:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, and people forget that the House passed a marijuana

717
00:37:24.760 --> 00:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>decriminalization bill last session. It's a very different House, of course,

718
00:37:29.159 --> 00:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think a big a good question to ask

719
00:37:32.039 --> 00:37:34.559
<v Speaker 1>of whether there's support for that in the.

720
00:37:34.360 --> 00:37:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that's kind of an early sleeper pick

721
00:37:36.440 --> 00:37:39.639
<v Speaker 5>for like a big issue that could divide the two chambers,

722
00:37:39.760 --> 00:37:42.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, when we get around to like April or May,

723
00:37:42.519 --> 00:37:45.239
<v Speaker 5>and you know, thinking about bills that could could bring

724
00:37:45.440 --> 00:37:48.719
<v Speaker 5>drag other uncontroversial bills down with it. You know, there's

725
00:37:48.719 --> 00:37:51.199
<v Speaker 5>always a few of those every session. I feel like

726
00:37:51.920 --> 00:37:53.880
<v Speaker 5>it seemed like the vibe that in the House is

727
00:37:54.400 --> 00:37:58.880
<v Speaker 5>generally among the Republicans is against banning THHC, maybe more

728
00:37:58.920 --> 00:38:02.320
<v Speaker 5>regulation of it. It sort of depends on where Dan

729
00:38:02.360 --> 00:38:03.559
<v Speaker 5>Patrick wants to go with that.

730
00:38:04.199 --> 00:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope y'all have your suits already and you

731
00:38:08.000 --> 00:38:12.039
<v Speaker 1>know your floor passes ready to go. It's going to

732
00:38:12.079 --> 00:38:15.079
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting one hundred and forty days. We will

733
00:38:15.079 --> 00:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be here, The trip Cast will be here, We're going

734
00:38:16.920 --> 00:38:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to be running through the legislative session. If we built

735
00:38:20.719 --> 00:38:22.800
<v Speaker 1>find an audience, if people are enjoying it, we're going

736
00:38:22.840 --> 00:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>to keep going after that. So if you like the show,

737
00:38:24.760 --> 00:38:27.519
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep hearing it, share it with your friends,

738
00:38:28.360 --> 00:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>give us a good review, do all the things that

739
00:38:30.400 --> 00:38:34.280
<v Speaker 1>can help kind of promote the trip Cast and everything there.

740
00:38:34.599 --> 00:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Our schedule here is we're going to have a special

741
00:38:39.800 --> 00:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>version of the trip Cast sometime after the speaker vote

742
00:38:43.519 --> 00:38:47.519
<v Speaker 1>when we know who the speaker is, likely Wednesday, when

743
00:38:47.559 --> 00:38:49.599
<v Speaker 1>that episode will come. Then after that will be in

744
00:38:49.639 --> 00:38:54.280
<v Speaker 1>your various podcasting apps every Tuesday from here on out.

745
00:38:54.400 --> 00:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So it'll be me James and Eleanor and other Tribune

746
00:38:58.480 --> 00:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>journalists alongside you know, some experts and other things like that.

747
00:39:01.800 --> 00:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So looking forward to going through that with y'all. I

748
00:39:04.960 --> 00:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>want to say thank you to our sponsors, raise your hand,

749
00:39:07.480 --> 00:39:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Texas and Water Grows. Our producers for this show are

750
00:39:10.599 --> 00:39:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Rob a Vila and Chris Voboda. Our music our theme

751
00:39:14.639 --> 00:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>music that you heard at the beginning composed by Rob,

752
00:39:17.039 --> 00:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>so shout out to him for that. And we will

753
00:39:19.719 --> 00:39:20.760
<v Speaker 1>see y'all next week
