Speaker 1: Good evening, everybody. Welcome back to Discordant Dragons. I'm years
I'm your host. This is one hundred and seventy second
official episode of this stream series. Tonight, we have a
lot of great things to talk about, a wonderful guest,
and my two regular co hosts. But before we get
started on that, I want to give you a quick reminder.
My spring picnic is in about a month. It's April twelfth,
on a Saturday. It's in East Tennessee, just off Interstate
eighty one. If you're in the region and we'd like
to come hang out with me and a bunch of
based pro white people, have a great, family friendly picnic,
get in touch with me. Let me know. There's only
five people coming so far. I'd like to have eight
to ten, so we still have a few spots. I
rent us a nice little pavilion. It's a great time.
You can ask anybody who's been it's the best. It'll
be huge anyway tonight, like usual, I have some people
coming on that you will be familiar with. They've all
been on here before. But before we get to that,
I would like to remind you that during the course
of the stream, during each or after each dragon or
after each news topic, I will be answering any questions,
comments responses you have either to myself, the panel, or
the dragon's question via the paid chats entropies what I prefer.
That's the penned comment and all the chats. You can
also send in short comments on PayPal and cash app,
as well as rants on Rumble and hyper chats on
the Old Odyssey. And here they are right there. Now,
let me go ahead and kill my camera here. Well, actually, then,
wait one more thing before I kill my camera, let
me turn it back on here. I forgot because of
the Old Glory Club shilling them so hard. I ordered
some out and let me tell you, these things are
awesome and worth the money. These little things, they're little pouches.
Let me grab one here, their little white pouches. They
are strong, delicious mint. This is a great way to
get your nicotine and have fresh breath and just have
something tasty. And these little packs last for like two
hours a pop. They're great. So I will be having
one in for the entire stream tonight. So thank you
OGC for pure pressure me into getting some of these.
I appreciate it. All right, we're gonna kill the camera now. Okay.
The featured guest for this evening is the one and
only mister Pete Canonas. Welcome back, sir.
Speaker 2: He is. How are you doing.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm doing good. Glad that you are here because
there are some things that we need to talk about
in the news and you are the perfect man to
have a chat with about them tonight. So I am
glad you are here.
Speaker 2: I'm kind of riled up. So I'm kind of riled up.
So you got me on a good you got me
on a good day.
Speaker 1: Hell yeah, And well we'll shill here in a minute,
but I'm excited to talk about the special thing that
you've been covering lately on your podcast. But anyway, just
to let you guys know, American Elitists was supposed to
be here, but unfortunately he got called into work, so
he will not be able to be here. We'll try
to get American Elitist back on in a week or
two whenever his schedule works out. But we do have
both Newsfist and three of twelve with us tonight. Good evening, gentlemen.
Speaker 3: Good evening is thank you so much for having me.
Vacation is going.
Speaker 4: Very well, but I you know I thought I'd have
to break my FoST and come on and participate.
Speaker 1: Well, whenever I have Pete here, i'd like to have
you here because both of you really are you. You're
on the pulse when it comes to like dissident political stuff,
and you two have great things to say on the
same stream. So I'm very thankful you were able to
make it here, even though you're on vacation. Speaking of
vacation as it should go without saying, no Empire of
Lies this Thursday. We will be back with Empire of
Lies next week, not this week. So let's go ahead
and get the shilling out of the way, Pete canonas
I'm sure most of my viewers of all of them
already know who you are, But go ahead and give
yourself a shill. Let people know what you cover why
they should come check you out while I share your
link and all.
Speaker 2: The chat the Peek Canana Show. I also have a substack.
It's at Pete substack dot com. Of interest, we're on
episode nineteen. Episode nineteen will be dropping on Wednesday of
my reading of Alexander social Nissan's two hundred Years together
with a with a scholar of Russian history, doctor Matthew
Rafael Johnson, who's written for the Barings Review. He's been around.
He was in the dissident Right. He was the dissident
right before the dissident right existed, before anyone talked about
that term. He's been around forever and he is giving
insight into Sultanesan's history of Jewish the Jews in Russia
from the Czar period up until nineteen ninety five and
eighteen episodes public so far. Nineteen will be dropped on Wednesday,
and the review so far is that people are just
completely blown away by this. And you know, people are
calling it two hundred episodes together because it's six hundred,
because it's a big book, and I'm going to try
and make it one hundred and nine episodes and we'll
see that'll be perfect.
Speaker 1: Well, Pete, I wish you well with that, and I
will catch up on them when I have time. But
it's a lot of material to get through. I've only
listened to a couple of them so far. But it
is good and that guy is good. I'm glad you
had him for this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's the only person that you could have possibly
had for this. So there is a very big name
out there who made this suggestion, and he hasn't given
me permission to say who he is. But this is
probably one of the greatest suggestions because I think that
when I look back on this is my eighth year podcasting,
this will probably be something that I can point to
as far as a legacy goes.
Speaker 1: Beautiful, beautiful news Fist. You're up, man, give us a shield.
Speaker 4: Well, I'm actually on vacation at the moment, but you
can find all of my links at www dot nefist
dot net. Although my news show is pause for the moment.
You can check out my distributed Warfare channel. There's a
couple of things on there. There's a reprize of the
sixth Generation Warfare thing that I did with his and
a video essay on four B feminism and aquato farma,
which is a sort of Renaissance era Italian poison that
you may enjoy here.
Speaker 1: Indeed, mister three twelve, but do you think you want
to show it before we get started. I'll take that
as a note. Three.
Speaker 2: Are you with us?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I'm here, Yes, I'm here.
Speaker 1: Oh you just muted?
Speaker 5: Okay, Yes, I want to show Kimris Nexus again because
they are reporting that someone has figured out how to
modify the microcode of and dcpus, which is huge.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, really yes, oh well you have give me
just a second, gamers next as there it is, I
will share the link in the chat and we will
get started. Okay, hello to everyone in the chat. I
think we already have a lot of familiar faces here.
We have Fox and Ben and Wyatt's. Over in the
rumble chat, we have Oh hey, Forest mag Dump, I
love your name. I saw you on Twitter today on
something of Pete's and I love your name, Forest mag Dump.
That's great.
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 1: Let's see here over in YouTube we have a whole
bunch of regulars. I see there's my man, my bigoty Chums,
Streaky Bacon. We have no white guilt with us tonight,
Sunny Jim Melon, let's see. Oh, there's too many to name. Good,
good lord, there's a bunch of you here already. Excellent. Okay, well,
then let's go ahead and get started. Everybody who's here
knows the way that the game is played, so oh goodness,
Obs Crash, that's always a good sign. Let me fire
this back up here. Thanks, Obs, I appreciate it, all right.
That should work now, all right, as I was about
to say, let's go to the topics tonight. Okay, there
it is good. Okay, Well where do the people go?
Speaker 2: What?
Speaker 1: Oh my god, stream Yard changes that Jews are interface
all the time and reorganizes its buttons and nothing ever
works the same as it did a few weeks ago.
It's crazy. Anyway, I have it figured out. There's the branding.
Here we are. Tonight's topics are as follows. The Red
Dragon has war and Peace, the Green Dragon has the
bats came home to roost. The Black Dragon has a
us AIDS document dumpster fire, the White Dragon has Department
of Education disaster, and the Blue Dragon has Statute of Liberty.
Statute of Liberty. Now, since Peak Quanonas is the most
famous and the smartest of everyone here, that's a joke
because we were all joking about how we're all retarded
before we went live. Mister Pete Konas is going to
be the party leaders night, which means mister Pete gets
to choose a topic or he has to nominate one
of his two companions to choose a topic, and whoever
chooses the topic is the first one who has to
answer the Dragon's question before it opens up to regular
discourse after we watch a video or read a bit
of an article. So, mister Pete, the ball is in
your court. What will it be?
Speaker 2: First, Sir, I'm gonna choose one. Let's do one piece.
Speaker 1: All right, that's a good one. Okay. We are going
to go first to the gateway pundit. The Gateway pundit.
All right, Oh, I forgot obs crashed. I'm going to
reselect brave. There we go. Okay, we are good to go. Now,
this is firm Gateway pundit. Yemen's Hootie relative Yemen's Hooties
retaliate with a massive attack on US aircraft carrier the
Harry Truman with eighteen ballistic missiles and drown vow to
target all US warships in Red Sea and Arabian c
all right. Just hours after Trump authorized powerful military action
to restore American deterrence in the region, the embolden Hootie
fired eighteen missiles and eighteen ballistic and cruise missiles along
with a drone attack, vowing to escalate against all US
warships in the Red Sea and Arabian Sea. On Saturday,
President Trump, demonstrating his signature Piece through Strength, a doctrine
ordered a decisive and calculative military response against Houti rebels
in Yemen. Trump, donning his Maga hat and signature golf attire,
watched alongside top military officials as American forces obliterated Houti
terror positions. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseith made an appearance
on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. I think say
supposed to say that hammering home the clear message to
America's adversaries. The era of appeasement is over, an era
of peace through strength is a back, says mister Heseith.
We are sitting on four years of deferred maintenance from
Joe Biden. We're in particular where in particular, when you
talk about the Hooties, they were allowed for over one
hundred times to shoot at US ships, to shoot at
commercial shipping. Hegseth continued. This campaign is about freedom of
navigation and restoring deterrence. The minute the Huties say we
will stop shooting at your ships, we will stop shooting
at your drones, this campaign will end. But until then
it will be unrelenting. He warns. We will not be
nice about it. This is not the Biden admin. The
message is clear. We will come after Hooties until they
stop shooting our ships, and Iranians better stay out of it.
There's that old American war machine dick waving, dick waving,
I've missed, all right, that's a joke, by the way,
I don't like it.
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 1: Let's move to the Red Dragon, which is this noble
beast here they're read with us. Tonight is an elder
and respected leader in the Great Dragon Empire, and she
hopes one day to include Earth among the many glorious
worlds of her empire. She chose this story Tonight to
gauge how we feel about the US aegemony. Mister petekanons,
this question comes to you first. If a global hegemony
was headed by people who shared our morals and ethics,
would you support it? What qualities would such a hedgemon possess?
And is it in the realm of possibility?
Speaker 2: I mean, if our people were I don't know that
a global hedgemond. I'm more of a Monroe doctrine. You
take care of your own section of the world, You
make it as safe as possible. That I would that
I would support one hundred percent. That's kind of what
I thought that it sounded like a lot of the
people in the Trump administration were were pointing towards and
you know, of course, of course, the you know that
little that little country, our greatest ally is doing its
best to you know, to make sure that we stay
in wars that we shouldn't be in. What qualities would
such a hedgemond, Well, I mean a regional hedgemond, one
that is strong, is knows that you don't fuck with us,
and but is understands that we are superior in all ways,
and that we almost have to look upon other peoples
in the regions as we have to have sort of
a no bless obliege where we we help them out
as much as possible, and we only turn on them
when they turn on us. I think that would be
the be the proper way to deal with them in
road doctrine kind of a world hedgemond. I don't even
think that's possible, that in an age where you well,
when you consider history and how much evil shit this
regime has already done. You know, look at the look
at Gemen. Oh why as yet, why would Yemen be
attacking American military ships. Well, how about the how about
the American fucking The American fucking regime armed Saudi Arabia
to bomb Gemen for five six years to destroy their
inf to target their infrastructure they had, and there were
at least you know, Scott Horton talks about it, He
had at least five people reach out to him and
say that when those Saudi princes were getting in those
f eighteens to go bomb or whatever they were using
to bomb, if if that plane had a jump seat,
American white boys were in that jump seat telling them
and telling them what to target. YEP. I wonder why
the Mens would be absolutely pissed off at us. It
seems to me, if we wanted to deal with the
Mns properly, we'd go to them and be like, Okay,
we're going to rebuild all of your ship and you're
going to be a partner with us from now. I mean,
that's after you do all of that to them, where
you I think they had a a freaking cholera outbreak
or something like that. They had some kind of outbreak
of some something that hadn't been seen in the world
for like forty years, and it killed like you know,
forty fifty thousand people and something that, yeah, something that
gatorade would have would have cured, and we had such
an embargo on them and not allowing anything to come
in that I mean just people were shitting themselves to death.
Speaker 1: I mean, I remember that when you do that to them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, especially these people. These are these are people who
are steep. These are people who are living historically. These
are people who know what their grandparents did. These are
people who know what their grandfathers and their great grandfathers
and their relatives did. You know. These are people who
don't forget. These are people who may sit back for
a generation or two and wait for their opportunity. No,
these are people that if we're dealing with them at all,
you know, it pisses me off that I even know
where Yemen is on the map. There's no fucking reason
as an American I should know where Yemen is. But
because we're fucking around in the world that we allow
Israel to lead us around by the nose and also
Saudi to leave it lead us around by the nose.
And we know that Saudi and Israel or have been
doing business for you know, oh, they hate each other.
Someone assuming Yeah, it's like, come on, come on. If
I was a Yemeny, I would have taken I would
have taken a freaking oath. You know, you know years
ago that I would I would do everything I could
to kill as many Americans or any of America's allies
as possible. Yeah. Yeah, it's fucking it's fucking reached out.
I mean literally, we went after their frigging water treatment plants,
We went after their sewage. You know, we we showed Saudi,
we zeroed that stuff in so that Saudi could do it.
And I wonder why they're so fucking pissed off at
US hospitals. Fucking bullshit.
Speaker 1: All right, let's hear from someone else then, Thank you Pete.
That was great. Uh, who wants to go next?
Speaker 4: Okay next, I would say that a global hegemony is
not compatible with people who share our morals and ethics,
just just by definition, a global I mean a global
hegemony first start, is not quintessentially American, because it is
the definition of foreign entanglements. I mean, there is no
greater foreign entanglement than being the world police. And global
hegemonies always sort of wind up needing to be backed
by some kind of ideology. I don't think that a
genuine reading of Christianity, for example, has any of that
stuff that you've got to convert the entire world that
you should, you know, subjugate the entire planet to your religion.
It's it's just it's it's it's retarded. For such a
hegemon to exist, it would have to be backed. You know,
if we were taking the idea of saying a Christian
global hegemon, it would have to be some sort of
new Judeo Christian version of Christianity, right that you know
how it was like apocalyptic and evangelistic and you know,
of course love the Nation of Israel and all this
kind of other stuff.
Speaker 3: The sort of the old sort of version of Christianity,
the Orthodox version of Christianity, does not have this idea that.
Speaker 4: You go out and convert every body in the world.
Speaker 3: It's it's a retarded idea and.
Speaker 1: It just won't work.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, it won't work.
Speaker 4: And so and so, to continue this thought experiment, let's
say we did have this like I don't know, the
Jehovah's witnesses or the Christian Zionists or whatever, you know,
and indeed, actually you could you could make it a
pretty good argument that it was the Christian Zionist the
neo conservatives that actually backed the unipolar moment and the
attempt at a US global hegemony.
Speaker 3: And look how badly that fucked up.
Speaker 4: The thing that people don't really get, and you know,
particularly the decolonization retards, is that empires, often in their
late pretty much always in their late stage, wind up
costing the the sort of imperium more than they produce. Right,
the larger they get, the more problems multiply, the larger
administrative class you need in order.
Speaker 3: To keep it going.
Speaker 4: Rome was like this, Britain was like this, and the
US is like that as well. I think that we
are about to go back to a sort of global
model of spheres of influence.
Speaker 3: Weirdly enough, it seems.
Speaker 4: To be the UK and the EU that are the
most resistant to this, which.
Speaker 3: I find just incredibly annoying.
Speaker 4: Like watching the UK strut around the world stage like
it still has a fucking empire.
Speaker 3: Ah my god, it's it's just so sick.
Speaker 4: And every single time I like watch Starma talking like
he's still the head of a of the you know,
British empires.
Speaker 1: It's really pathetic me.
Speaker 4: I just I just want to like slap them across
the face and just be like, look, sit down, right, like,
just just sit the fuck.
Speaker 3: Down, right.
Speaker 4: You know, your your country has serious problem and indeed,
right like this, this is inevitably what tends to happen, right,
the problems of the home country get neglected in favor
of the problems at the edge of the empire. They
wind up sort of capturing the attention the the avarice
and and so the is it is the home country
that decays. You know, the US isn't exactly this position
at the moment. The UK as well. I mean, like
the UK is like, oh, you know, we have to
protect the borders of the of the Ukraine. God, protect
your own borders first. You can't even protect your own borders,
right Like, So yeah, I don't.
Speaker 3: I don't.
Speaker 4: I don't think it's I don't think it does. It
is supported by you know, quote our morals and ethics,
and thus I would not support it, and I don't.
Speaker 3: Think it is within that.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Three twelve. What do you have to say
on this one?
Speaker 5: I want to add on to what both of them said.
I mean, fundamentally, it is impossible to have a global
edgement that has consistent laws because of the current state
of the planet. Most of the world is not developed.
It would have to have some sort of compromised value
system that really doesn't align with us. It would have
to It could pretend it most, but really it would
be like the globals, and we already know it would
be Third worlders who have an average IQ seventy meeting
constant Gibbs, and they would be such a weight on
the developed world that it would all collapse into a
black hole. Take that metaphorically if you want, But seriously,
we're not ready. We aren't ready for that. The nation
seats of the world need to develop more first. I'm
trying to invoke Star Trek, the Star Trek Bible on this,
where it took some kind of World War III where
the entire human race realized all that this is stupid.
We need to stop fighting. We need to develop the nations.
We need to stop letting terrible leaders run countries into
the ground. There needs to be consequences for them. There
needs to be essentially a universal adoption of the Founding
Father's Enlightenment values, and the entire world needs to be
like US. Essentially, they would have to be the entire
world would have to be the United States.
Speaker 1: So you're making the argument of why we say things
like global communism can't work. It's just you would have
to unify people on a genetic and cultural level and
you just can't do that.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, the closest we've ever gotten to that
is essentially the great, the great colonial powers essentially running
the world for people where they did it better than
they ever could and basically turn their their resources into civilization.
And frankly, I would suggest that we start doing that
right now and it would slowly cause relations to sort
of unify. What's what I'm looking for, you know, we
need to we need to make inroads on that where
the world understands that the best ideas are the the
the ideas of the founding fathers. We essentially do need
an American empire and it needs to become everywhere. Everyone
needs to be Americans.
Speaker 1: Now careful, now, careful, you're starting to sound like them
Christian zigon As weirdos, all right, but.
Speaker 5: Seriously, Nonzionism, no Jude Judaism, then that.
Speaker 1: Shit, I understand, I'm just being fun going on to
what these three guys said, Uh, my take on the
dragons question. I also don't think in the realm of possibility,
with the technology and the different kinds of humans and
intelligent creatures that populate the world, I don't think that
a noble, functional global hedgemon is possible with what we
have now. It would take either something basically make believe
like noble aliens or magic space dragons that come here
and try to run everything for us to make us
have you know, a peaceful you know, hey, everybody, we're
the hedgemon. You're protected. Here's some basics of living. Nobody's
allowed to make war on each other. Or you're going
to get magic space newped Now, y'all play nice and
get along. Or it would take something like a mega
empire spending decades or centuries making war on the whole
world to remake it and organize it in a single image.
I don't really see that being a noble good, And
if people that share my ethics and values were in charge,
they wouldn't want to do that in the first place,
just like you guys said. So the reason that I
phrased the question that way is I think it brings
up a good point if we are going to have
to have regional hegemons on earth, Like let's say that
we do the Monroe doctrine and we manifest destiny Canada
and Mexico, and we say, all right, Canada and Mexico
belongs to this group. We the Anglo people whatever we
call ourselves, Americans or whatever, this is our hedgemon here
in North America. We're laying claimed to ABC DNE. This
is what we have, this is what we run. And
if people like us were in charge of that whole
process and did the things necessary to enshrine values and
systems and a way of having a mix of like
aristocracy and meritocracy that would have people that are fit
to lead also compete to be the best leader, then
you might could really have something. But that requires a
unified Ethnos and a large genetically homogeneous population that we
don't have yet. So again, even on a smaller scale,
I don't even see that being possible right now. But
I do think that a smaller scale type of regional
hegemon on Earth is a realistic possibility that we might
could have one day. What do you guys think about that?
Speaker 2: Have you ever have you ever read the art that
Carl Young did about how Adolf Hitler wasn't even and
I know I've invoked Hitler, so I mean we're already
we're going down the.
Speaker 1: We talked about uncle h rdder Off and on my
show it's.
Speaker 2: Okay that he he when you were speaking to him,
it wasn't like you were speaking to one person, it
was like you were speaking to a nation, because he
basically when he spoke, it was like he was speaking
for the nation you it was a nation of Germans.
How what leader? What kind of leader would you need
in this country to elect that could actually speak for Americans.
We're a multi culture or a multicultural I mean, people say, oh,
why is Trump always succumbing to the Jews? Why is
he he's always you know, he panders to the blacks,
because that's the spirit of this nation. The spirit of
this nation is multiculturalism.
Speaker 1: And the real or if that is multi racialism.
Speaker 2: Honestly, yeah, so if he's if if somebody is going
to speak for the people that are here, he's speaking
for he's speaking for competing groups, which is why you know, multiculturalism,
multi racialism just doesn't work because you can't have a leader,
well you're going to have a leader who's just going
to have one is going to be like, oh, this
is the only group I'm going to be. I don't
even think that's metaphysically possible. Yes, So, I mean I
don't know where we I don't know where we go.
I mean, you know we I guess Thomas and I
talk all the time about how you have to find
your own people and even move to to certain areas,
and you know, you need people who who are of
the same race and of the same culture to come
together or else you're just you're basically stuck in a
soup and you're not going to leader. No Latin national
leader is going to speak for you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's another thing. That's another hurdle that we will
have to clear. Another obstacle in our path is who
even are we now? Like this is a major problem
that isn't just an American problem. I know we're American,
so we talked that way here, but you know, Chris
lives in London and he's from Australia.
Speaker 4: And yeah, well you know, if you're in the UK, right,
it's it's not just there's no one to speak for you,
is it? Truly no one to speak the goddamn language.
Speaker 1: It's worse.
Speaker 3: It's getting to like just complete clown wall levels.
Speaker 4: It's you know, it's not there's not even a veneer
of some kind of like shared culture.
Speaker 3: It's it's insane.
Speaker 1: So that's that's why I lean towards the people who
are doing their best to rekindle that kind of energy,
like the Old Glory Club, the White Well Being Community
led by Jason Kuna, people that are literally building what
it's going to take to have a unified ethnose against
this erasure of what we are like, because that is
step one to having any nation. You have to have
a people who know there are people and are identifying
as a people and are willing to fight to defend that.
If you don't have that, then then all is lost
and our ethics and values don't matter because they'll die
with us. So well, that's why I think that's the
first step that we have that we really have to
work on.
Speaker 2: And you can't look to a national leader as somebody
who you can look to a national leader who as
somebody who can break down some walls and some boundaries
that make what you want to do easier. But no
national leader of a multicultural friggin salad, multi racial and
multicultural salad is going to be is going to be
able to do anything about it. It's he or she
whoever that is going to be, is going to be
met a physically, on a metaphysical level, subservient to everyone.
So you have to be able to break up. You
have to be able to you know, and I'm not
even saying, you know, you break up and you go
to really small towns, you could probably take over a
city or something like that. You know, it's going to
take probably take a generation or two. But I mean,
it's impossible to think that this country that you know
has been allowed to be, you know, has really been
on the downswing since about eighteen eighty when a certain
group just started piling in here from Eastern Europe. Yeah.
Is yeah, I mean, you're just there's no possible, as
someone Austrian guy mentions Irania, of course, that is That's
what you have to do. You have to find your
people and you have to make your stand where you are.
Speaker 1: Well, that was a great conversation, gentlemen. That was a
good first topic. Thank you, Peter, Thank you everybody. Let's
move to paid chats now and see what everybody's saying.
And just to let you know, I have cash app
and PayPal open. We will be starting over on Entropy
with Kizza. Gt kiss Us is a YouTube link to
one of his doom clips, because he loves expressing himself
with doom memes. It's two minutes. I'm not going to
play it, but for five US dollars, he says, an
Anglo world order can only be achieved with relentless violence
against the demons, as the link shows, enjoy your massive
injection of TRT and show God that we are his
true chosen people. I don't know what injection of TRT means.
Speaker 2: Does anybody know that testone? I think it's testone replacement therapy.
Speaker 1: Ah, test of stone replacement therapy. Thank you very much?
Speaker 2: All right yet, thanks, yeah.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Kizza for the five dollars. Much appreciated,
my friend. All right, let's see what we have over here.
Nothing there, all right, nothing else is showing up, so
we can go ahead and move on to the next.
Oh wait, no, I just got a blinky on the phone.
Speaker 2: Who is it?
Speaker 1: Oh no, it just a worthless notification. Never mind, all right,
moving on, Let's go ahead and drop that and we'll
bring back up the topics we just did the Red Dragon,
which is war and peace. That leaves the bats came
home to roost. Us aid's document dumpster fire, deal we disaster,
and the Statute of Liberty. Mister Pete, you're the party leader.
What will it be?
Speaker 2: H news Fisk, go ahead and pick something.
Speaker 4: Ah, okay, I'll take USAID's document dumpster fire for ten points.
Speaker 3: That you very much is.
Speaker 1: Oh boy, okay, all right, we actually have a few
things to look at here, and let's see. Let me
make sure I have them all open. Yeah, here we go,
all right, one and two and three, there we go.
All right, let's start with this one. We'll start looking
at this here. This is from Yahoo News staff at
the US Agency for International Velaments Trump administration has targeted
to be shut down. We're given an order tuesday seems
to violate federal law. The few US eight employees remaining
after Trump's mass firing were directed on Tuesday to shred
and burn classified and personnel documents remaining at the Washington
DC headquarters. Many of you have probably seen this already,
if not most of you. This was big, went viral,
went around everywhere you can see here this is an
internal email that says, shred as many documents. First, reserve
the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable and
needs a break. If you need to use the burn bags,
do not overfill. Blah blah blah, right secret on them, etc. Etc. Now,
next we have from a smaller website. This talks about
the person who gave this order. USAID Act Acting Executive
Director Erica Carr ordered her remaining staff to shred and
burn documents before Elon Musk's doge could finish shutting down
the agency. What is the deep state prime to hide?
Now we'll skip this part. Let's see here, where's the
part that's about Erica. All right, here we go. Erica Carr,
the one delivering the email, who is an old school
bureaucracy drone. Erica has a history of being a deep
state official. She worked at the Office of Personnel Management
from two thousand and seven to two thousand and nine,
but basically the federal government's HR department. During President Obama's
first year in office, Carr moved to us AID and
she's been there ever since. In twenty twenty one, President
Biden appointed Carr as the us AID Executive secretary, so
she's been in the USA leadership for quite some time,
further raising red flags about her directive to destroy evidence.
I think that's very And then just the day after
this was made public, we see this the DOJ says
that us AID staffers were not ordered to shred burn
classified documents as Trump dismantles agency. Well, it isn't that interesting.
Seems that government has investigated government and they did nothing wrong.
The Department of Justice has batted down accusations of document
destruction at the US Agency for International Development after an
internal agency directive apparently ordered the burning and shredding of
classified records as the Trump admin forges ahead dismantling the agency.
Attorneys for the Justice Department claimed that this out of
context email reported on Tuesday created a misapprehension that an
indiscriminate purge was taking place. Trained USAID's staff sorted and
removed classified documents in order to clear the space formerly
occupied by us AIDS for its new talent for its
new tenant. Excuse me, the removed classified documents had nothing
to do with this litigation, wrote the DOJ attorney Michael Clendenman.
Here's a quote. They were copies of documents from other
agencies or derivatively classified documents where the originally classified document
is retained by another agency and for which there is
no need for USA to retain a copy. Any documents
pertaining to current classified programs were retained, as were all
personnel records and any document that must be retained under
the fr A. I find that interesting, So let's move
to the Black Dragon and see what he has to say.
The Black with us tonight is a curious worm for centuries.
He's hoarded secrets instead of gold, and he prides himself
on being one of the best informed information or one
of the best information brokers in the underbelly of the
Great Dragon Empire. He likes Earth and enjoys the endless
intrigue among its many factions. He chose this story tonight
to ask us this, and you chose at newsfists, So
it comes to you first. What do you think is
going on with the story? Deep state or a Democrat
cover up or a be nine internal email given importance
by the hyper awareness of the current era, that's a.
Speaker 3: Really interesting question.
Speaker 4: I think the amount of fraud in USAID is going
to be revealed as massive and also byzantine. However, I
suspect it's going to take quite a while to untangle
where all the money went, and so I would suspect
that anyone involved is going to want to cover their
tracks as much as possible. So it might be technically
true that these documents are still with another agency, but
by destroying them at USAID, it will make them harder
to sort of get a hold of. And also, I mean,
from what I've seen, there's so much grafting corruption at
USAID that there is probably the hope of people who
were involved in sort of semi shady stuff that all
these sort of really shady.
Speaker 3: Stuff will get dealt with. First. I think what was
happening with with USA I D is a sort of
classic example.
Speaker 4: Of people who they just they just stopped like caring,
Like the fraud got so blatant and they thought they
would never be held to account for it. That you know,
when you know, the someone's like, oh, we've got a funnel,
you know, a couple of hundred thousand to people in
Pakistan or whatever, they're just like, oh, you know, make
it a transgender like play or something like that.
Speaker 1: Kic condoms for Gaza.
Speaker 4: There's no reason why they could not have thought of
better sounding covers for these money transfers.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 4: It's it's probably a bit of bioleninism as well. They
were hiring, you know, the right ideological people. But I
just I get the general impression that they just thought,
you know, no one's, no one's going to notice.
Speaker 3: This is going to go on forever.
Speaker 4: Indeed, I think one of the biggest surprises of the
Trump presidency has been the gutting of USAID. So I
was reading an article a while back where the Democrats
were doing a red Team Blue team thing on what
was going to happen if Trump got into office, right,
and the assumptions of this scenario was were very very telling,
because the assumption was that they would keep all of
the funding sources in place, and thus they would be
allowed to do things like mobilized BLM, mobilize Antifa, all
this kind of other stuff. The idea that the money
would be cut off did not seem to enter their
consciousness at all. So they were gaming on the idea
that they would continue to have the same amount of
deep state assets that they had previously, and as a result,
you know things, you know seemed to go quite well.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 3: They would they.
Speaker 4: Would be shredding documents. I think, I just I think
there's I think they're not going to know where the
money went. I think a lot of the the sort
of reasons that they were giving it, even even if
some of it was actually going towards the thing. But
this is, of course, is the ridiculous point as well, right,
Like you know, Archimed comes along.
Speaker 3: And is like how long is that a mut again? Please?
Can I you know I'm doing the wrong accent, but.
Speaker 4: You know, like, can I can I have money for
you know, women's studies in Afghanistan?
Speaker 3: You know, write or you know whatever, right, like you know, we.
Speaker 4: Need a transgender swimming pool in fucking Guinea Bissau or
you know whatever.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 4: And when the money, when the money actually gets there, right,
it is, it is quickly spirited away, you know. To look,
international development is notoriously, notoriously corrupt. Right if you ever
spoken to anyone who works for the United Nations, works
in internet, especially in Africa, Oh my god, you just
talked to them for five minutes, just scratch the surface,
and the first thing they talk about is just how
immensely corrupt. The entire process is right, it's it's not
and even that the basic function behind US A I D. Right,
it's not us AID, it's U S a I D.
International development and international development. Development is not about you know,
giving you know, free kids to free money to like
the kiddiwinks and solving world.
Speaker 3: Hung and hunger.
Speaker 4: It is about capacity building, right, and capacity building is
code for a civil society, code for setting up organizations
that can steer the government in the ways that we want.
Speaker 3: It's basically it's basically.
Speaker 1: Setting up c A A nodge units and propaganda outlets.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, exactly, propaganda outlets, and if the government ever
goes in a way that we don't want, the ability
to overthrow that government, as we saw recently in Georgia Georgia,
which failed, and they're trying it.
Speaker 3: Now in Serbia, Romania to Romania.
Speaker 4: That's right, yes, exactly. There's gonna be a whole bunch
of these going on in Eastern Europe due to the
you know, the just retarded war with Russia that has
just been sort of in a basically sort of a
you know, Victoria Newland, Robert Kagan, Atlantic Council Foreign state
neo conservative blob project for like ages, you know why
nobody knows. I think I think it's it's it's ethnic hatred. Honestly,
right at this at this point, I really believe it's
it's just about ethnic hatred. There seems to be no
real sort of strategic reason, right why you would need
to go to war with Russia and break it up
into ten smaller countries if it weren't some kind of like,
you know, ethnic hatred.
Speaker 3: I wonder what soljier Nisen would say about that.
Speaker 4: A Pete anyway, yep, so a bit of a bit
of both, maybe.
Speaker 1: Three or twelve I'm sorry or Pete.
Speaker 2: Sorry, no, go ahead?
Speaker 1: If I saw him unmute, That's why I said his name. Sorry, sorry.
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't think that it's that like, I
think it's that deep. I think it really is just corruption.
It's they're they're burning they're the most recent stories about
them basically ordering their the rank and file people to
destroy documents. Is it is what it is, they're destroying
evidence of their corruption.
Speaker 2: I think I have a tendency to believe that this
is some kind of distraction. I mean, are these really
are these really paper documents. I would think that all
of this is being stored on a hard drive somewhere.
You know that this is this is a computer.
Speaker 5: Maybe there might be a backup somewhere, but the US
government is notoriously undercomputerized. Yeah, it's also gone. I saw
a story about this.
Speaker 2: What I'm hearing from people I have on the inside,
hm hmm, okay, I mean, God, I mean, I'm.
Speaker 5: Sure it's mostly at this point because a big point
of the about administration was to finally computerize the government.
See as as recently as two thousand and nine, only
fifteen percent of the government operations had been computerized. And
I'm also hearing that a lot of the government operates
on you know, not necessarily X eighty six desktops, but
very strange SEC systems that are very like exotic, esoteric
and obviously corrupt in general, which the whole point of
buying them was just to give some company money and
not ever really use them. God, there was a story
I sall recently that got my attention, but apparently not
enough because I don't remember it where they said that
an enormous amount of government operations were being run on
SC systems that were very, very easy to pretty into
because they weren't ya just handled by conventional network security.
Speaker 1: I have heard from people. I've heard mixed stories from
people about how backwards the government is and also how
much certain parts of the government have made strides to
become digital. So like, for example, one of my uncles,
when you couldn't serve active anymore, he got some crappy
government job and he was shocked at just how tech
retarded every government thing.
Speaker 5: He yes, I also have some personal experience with this,
considering my mother worked in the government for the Navy
Yard and she was present the day of the shooting there,
and she knew people who died.
Speaker 1: So I wanted to talk to you, Pete. Pete, did
you say I'm roboting for you?
Speaker 2: Yeah, you were roboting for me? Was I the only
one who was hearing that?
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's fine for me too. Well, I think, let
me let me.
Speaker 1: But yeah, probably it happens to Charlie sometimes too, and
he uses starlink. Let me ask you said, it might
be a distraction. See now, when I saw this story
making the rounds a few days ago, that to me,
I thought, Okay, why is this so big and why
are we being directed to it because there's a whole
bunch of other crap going on right now. So whenever
I see something that I don't think is very important
being made to be important, I'm always of that same
mind as you pee. So one of the reasons I
wanted to bring this up is was to ask you
what do you think this is being used for? If
this is a nothing burger and it's a distraction, what
do you think the point is? What do you think
they're trying to steer us away from that's going on
the last few days.
Speaker 2: Well, obviously that that they're not moving as fast as
most people want them to, and this gives them something
to scream. This gives people something to scream about. Okay,
So I mean the easiest most people are retards, and
I mean the easiest way to distract a rechard is to,
you know, wave a lollipop in front of his face. Yeah,
I mean, this just seems like waving a lollipop in
front of somebody's face.
Speaker 1: Because the base is wanting deportations, the base is wanting
Mstein files, et cetera. And this is like a mix
of distraction and red meat. You're saying.
Speaker 2: The more and more I watch all this and you know,
the older I get and the more I read and
the more the more I just pay attention. You know,
really the average person who can get on Twitter and
like get a following, like, especially if they're like Maga.
These these people are not smart enough to be dealing
in politics, or to be dealing in geopolitics, or to
be dealing in anything of the scale that what we're
looking at. I mean, most people, most people shouldn't even
know you know who, Most people don't even know who
their mayor is. So I I think this is literally
just a distraction for the Spurgs who are just going
to be screaming, screaming about you know, oh well they're
just not doing enough. Oh okay, well look here, here's
something for you to be raging about for a couple
of days. Oh they're burning stuff. What are we going
to do? And I mean, these are people who aren't
because they're so Trump tarted and they're so like, you know,
he's he's our savior and everything. They're not going to
hold him accountable for what's not being done. And maybe
there's a bunch of stuff being done in the background
that I don't know about it. I'm willing to accept that.
Speaker 1: Well, we all hope, so we hope, so Pete. But
but I'm skeptical minded. Like you, we know the company
that Trump keeps. We saw what he did last time.
We see the things that are that are happening. We're
not dumb, me and you and everybody here included, Like
we see what's happening, and so we're very skeptical.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: You know, like I talk about a lot on my show,
maybe there are some really good things going to happen
with this presidency. Maybe, but I'll believe in when I
see him.
Speaker 5: I mean, I have some things to say about that.
The since we all personally know people who are actually
spurging about Trump not doing enough, I'm a bit more
patient on that, considering I am aware of things that
he was doing in the background in the first term
that significantly contributed to his presidency being well good, in particular,
the fact that he was constantly doing deregulation quietly in
the background that led to a significant amount of intermittent
deflation that kept the that held the economy together until
COVID happened. I'd say that that that's that's still happening
in the background there's some evidence of it that and also.
Speaker 2: That just tells me that that COVID was planned. Oh
it was planned, but and he knew about it.
Speaker 5: I'm sure he did. I'm sure he was preparing for it.
But more to the point that that actually working on
the economy has dragged down certain factors that were that
were contributing to the consumer unwillingness to spend money, for example,
like high inflation on commodities. But the eggs dropping approximately
two dollars on average across the entire country meant that
this month that I believe food was only about one
point five percent inflation, which is incredibly good. It was
so good that when presented to their so they could
post that. When it was presented to redtators, they freaked
out because they thought inflation was tied to consumer spending
and they're like, oh my god, the economy's going up
its own bottle.
Speaker 4: O all, oh wow.
Speaker 5: I think you need to take even one media economics
class and you will be you will understand that this
is actually fantastic, This is great. I mean, I'm really
happy to hear that that's being resolved already. And I
say it's some combination of farmers rushing to get more
like hens produced, you know, upping egg production, doing whatever
they can to move this back along because it's it's there.
Just isn't the demand without the supply. I don't I
don't see people buying eggs if they're ten dollars a dozen.
You know, it's not gonna happen. So they had to
do something about it. I'm sure that everyone in the
market is scrambling as as as the private market does,
but more and to the point about what you're saying,
that the average person are retards, it's very that's a
very similar phenomenon to being held accountable, feels like oppression
when they're used to having special privileges. It's very similar
to that in that the average IQ in the United
States is approximately one hundred IQ, and to someone who
has an IQ one hundred and thirty, that's gonna seem
like a retard. And the sad news of those statistics
is that that's the average and the standard deviation on
that is going at there into like the into like
approximately ninety and one hundred and ten, which means the
vast majority of people in the United States, our people
were not capable of doing any sort of high level
administrative work or running a company or doing anything really
super substantial their lives.
Speaker 1: Any top of meaningful infrastructure upkeep.
Speaker 5: Yes, nothing that can nothing that that would get them
into the higher levels of anything. So you have to
keep that in mind that we're and we have a
we have a we're like the top end of that.
As far as average IQ is going, imagine how dysfunctional
societies are outside of the United States, especially even in Europe,
where the average is in the nineties. An average of
ninety five is.
Speaker 2: Disaster two. Yet they control us.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's disasters. It's disasters for how societies function. Until
they can improve nutrition and get those IQs up, It's
like the rest of the world's could just become going
to be retarded for ages.
Speaker 1: But the last not I'm not an IQ as all
type of person.
Speaker 3: But I don't.
Speaker 5: I'm not either. I'm just using it as a sort
of allegory of like the state of the world.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, fair enough, But one of the important
things to look at when it comes to IQ stuff
is the the racial averages of IQ are pretty much
the same across the world. When IQ averages dip, it's
usually because of how the data is collated, or because
they include races into groupings that shouldn't be, so that
when I looked into a big IQ study like ten
twelve years ago, pretty much every European based ethnic group,
every every one of the if you want to use
the older arget, all the European races, they all have.
We all have like a fairly high average IQ of
like a little over one hundred. And when you start
looking at the the mixed race and subracial groups in
the in these data, no other group except for the
high minded East Asians is anywhere close to us on
average IQ. And so that's why I think IQ is
sort of like a safe way to talk about racial
differences with. And that's why I just I avoid it now.
I just speak directly with race because to me, if
you're going to talk about IQ and and it matter,
I think it needs to not be comparing between races,
because look at all of the idiots we have in
our own race. Look at saying that just just because
our race is a is a higher or one of
the highest IQ averages doesn't really mean anything. When you
have all this mind poison being pushed into people, you
have a biolininistic society that rewards idiots and lazy people
and evil people. So when it comes to this, to
this topic, I don't know, like I hear what you're saying. Three,
I just I don't know. I just I just don't
know if IQ is a good metric for what we're
talking about.
Speaker 5: I know, I know, but I was trying to make
a point on how like the average person is in
midwid you're not going to get anything useful to them,
and they don't deserve to have controls.
Speaker 3: They don't.
Speaker 5: We shouldn't be ruled by these people. They shouldn't be
in power, and their opinion should not be considered.
Speaker 1: Okay, Okay, so that's that's where you were going with
AQ thing. Okay, well, I'll tell you what, Guys, we've
talked enough on this one. Let's move on for sake
of time here and let's go over to entropy because
we have a very nice Entropy from battle Cat. Battle
Cat's a long time follower of mine over on Rumble.
Battlecat says for fifteen US dollars, thank you so much. Yes,
I love the Weekly Dragon stream. You and your guests
always give me plenty of food for thought. I must
go back over the past one hundred and seventy one
episodes as a refresher. If I listened to today, that's
nearly three months worth. What better way to prepare for WBS.
What better way? Indeed, my friend, God bless you and
thank you for the sharing your dollars with me. Thank you,
thank you. Okay, let's check cash app again. Let's check PayPal. Okay,
we have something from Jason Kuna, the No White Guilt
Guy with us live tonight. In the chat, Jason sends
in ten US dollars on cash App. Thank you very much, brother,
he says, you always make a great show folk Tithe
and Kip, Well, thank you, Jason. I do my best
to be entertaining and educational and inspiring at the same time.
I want people to not give up. I don't want
to just black pill people, but I want people to
be aware of what's going on, and I want them
to have fun listening to me while I tell them
about it. So thank you very much. All right, we'll
bid adiue to this awesome, badass black Dragon and we
will go back to the Dragon topics. Now we just
did us aids dumpster fire that leaves three that leaves
the bats came home to roost. The Statute of Liberty
and Doe disaster. Mister Pete, you're the party leader. What
will it be, sir?
Speaker 2: Let's do the Statue of Liberty?
Speaker 1: All right, the Statue of Liberty. This one should be
sort of short and fun, all right, going over now
to I usually don't share it on my channel, but
we're going to look at a Politico article for a second.
Here give back the Statue of Liberty. French EMP tells
the US. French socialist MP says that Washington's embrace of
dictators negates the values that led France to bestow the
iconic statue one hundred and forty years ago. She's been
covered by glacier, smashed up by various giant monsters, and
left to decay on a planet overrun by super intelligent apes.
But even in Hollywood's even in a Hollywood scriptwriter's worst nightmare,
Lady Liberty surely couldn't be sent back to France. So
this is a pretty short article. I don't really care
about some stupid frog socialist. I just don't give a crap.
It's the usual talking points. You know, we love Ukraine.
You don't you love Russia. You're a jerk. So we're
going to be a snide, arrogant Frenchman at you. We're
going to say to Americans, if you want to fire
your best researchers, if you want to fire all the
people who, through their freedom and sense of innovation, their
taste for doubt and research, have made your country the
world's leading power, then you're going to welcome them. So
then we are going to welcome them. Basically, he's saying,
you know, I want all the paused, anti white shit
libs to leave your country and the quote unquote experts
to come to France along with the statue of liberty
is basically what he's saying. So that is the gist
of this article, and I found it quite funny. So
let's move to the blue dragon here. I love this artwork,
by the way, great art. The blue with us Tonight
is a philosopher and academic among dragons, and he prides
himself on understanding understanding the lesser intelligent species like humans.
This article seems to be written for people who live
in America but aren't really American by this panel's judgment.
So he's curious what we think Pete, would you like
the Statue of Liberty, or even the people who this
article is written for to be sent to France or elsewhere?
What American symbols and creeds would you like to expunge?
Speaker 2: No, I mean I want to keep the Statue of
Liberty even I want to keep the Statue of Liberty
and remove that insane poem from it written by Emma
Emma Lazarus. Let me give you, let me let me
give a sound effect here, Emma Lazarus.
Speaker 1: American not even have to check early on Wikipedia.
Speaker 2: No, not at all. But we have to remove that
because it's just I mean, that is just like the
guy who came up with the term the melting pot,
I mean another one. But the uh, creeds and American
symbols and creeds, the symbols and creeds that the symbols.
I think we should be tearing down every single POC
statue and replacing it with the heritage American even Confederate
generals and Confederate heroes. Those are people who actually.
Speaker 1: I'm not there with you. There needs to be more Roberty.
Speaker 2: Lee love yeah, oh absolutely, and creeds I mean I
don't know about I mean, what are we talking about
like the Pledge of Allegiance things like that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, stuff like that stuff.
Speaker 2: You know, if we were a coherent culture, a coherent
racial nation, we wouldn't need those.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 2: It's like or it's like Oron McIntyre says, he goes,
the only reason you write laws is to formalize what
what your people are about, what your what your community
is about. The first time you have to write a
law or come up with a creed to say to
to like you're fighting against people who are you know,
you write a law because oh, you're having crime now,
or you write a law for oh, people have to
believe this. Your culture is done. You're as soon as
you have to write a law to defend against attacks,
well it's over unless you just absolutely crush those people. So,
you know, I do like symbols and creeds, but they
have to be symbols and creeds that are organic, not
something that has to be forced. Because we've been forced
into a corner where we have to say this is
what we stand for. It should be evident what we
all stand for.
Speaker 1: Well said Pete, thank you, thank you.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Look, I mean look Pete is absolutely right.
Speaker 4: According or On, this is of course, the problem with multiculturalism.
The more that belief systems and action patterns diverge, the
more lawss proliferate, and the more every scene part of
society needs to be controlled by those laws, and it
just becomes ridiculous. Not an American personally, although I do
identify as a trans American. If I had to pick,
I would say that the concept of Judaeo Christianity has
to be removed.
Speaker 1: Stole my answer. I was going to bring that up.
Speaker 3: Christianity and Judaism are not compatible.
Speaker 4: For hundreds of years, there has been an attempt to
create this horrible two headed mutant hydra by artificially grafting.
Speaker 3: These two belief systems together for some weird reason.
Speaker 4: Though I just can't put my finger on why it is.
It is always Christianity that winds up changing right, Like
you know, when there's interfaith dialogue, for example, it's over
the Christians telling the Jews how they must change right,
how they need to understand Christian history. It's always the
other way around. Christianity and Judaism are not hannibal and
the sort of you know, hippie dippy Christian Zionist kind
of Frankenstein that has been burst through this centuries long
process has wrought so much destruction on Christianity. It has
basically rewritten so much of Christianity. If you look at
Christian Zionism, for example, there's basically no real Christianity left
in it. And because this is a fundamentally one of
the large, fundamentally driving ideologies of the US.
Speaker 3: And you have a lot of these people just you.
Speaker 4: Know, a lot of Americans sort of wholeheartedly believing in
what are essentially Jewish conceptions of Christianity, you know, like
the apocalypse, the rapture, the idea that the nation of
Israel needs to be restored in order for the Messiah
to come back and always come by the same.
Speaker 1: Your show filled Bible loos those people.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Not to mention the integration of other Eastern religions
into Western secularism, like Buddhism, Yogaism.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this comes back to ecumenism, which is also a poison.
I mean, do you think the Muslims believe there are
many paths to God?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 3: No, no, no.
Speaker 4: The only people who believe that there are many paths
to God are fundamentally cucks, right, Like, you know, there
is there is one path to God right and you
know there is one path to the Christian God, that
is Christianity right now.
Speaker 3: I mean, you guess you could split points about whether.
Speaker 4: Other gods exist or not, but it is it is
only you know, do you think that the Jews believe
that there's many parts to God? No, it's only the
Christians that are forced to or you know, the sort
of atheist cucks that are forced to adopt this position.
It is retarded and I would strongly push back against ecumunism.
That is not, of course, just the American conceit. You
see it everywhere in the world.
Speaker 5: What about you, Van, I suddenly crave bacon and beer. Yeah,
the whole situation with this one. I saw this on
Twitter as soon as I opened the app today and
I felt immediately disgusted for all the same reasons I've
always been funding fundamentally disgusted with what New Speaker is describing,
the sort of forced multi culturalism, the integration of Zenus values,
and on another, on another level, disgusted with French liberalism
constantly trying to rare road Us to being more like them.
I don't I don't like the statue of liberty. I
don't like what it represents. I don't like the poem.
I don't like that like we'd have to, I mean,
we could reclaim the statue of liberty in a sense
by making it by saying that, like, yeah, we represent
it more than you do. I don't even like. I
don't like the current state of things where we actually
represent those values more than they do. Now, even they're
uncooked French liberalism, like with the Shenanians they pulled in
the most recent French election. The fact that the US
is currently denying the Romanians in their own election. Serbians
are going through something similar. No, none of you. I
am very recently in the last couple of weeks or so,
with everything that's happened. I similarly absolutely despise every the
state of Europe. I despise europe cooks. I don't hate
them as a people, but I'm really pissed off of
the current state of those relations because they're all acting
like they have great power status and they don't and don't.
I'm not I'm trying not to. I'm really trying not to.
But there's there's obviously a certain group of people who
are voting for this, Like I mean, The reason why
the leftists or stone power in the leftist globals, or
stone power in France is because they had one of
their leftist parties stand down and essentially being faced to
either vote for left or those bad, bad, bad right
wingers they cooked and vote for, voted for the leftists,
which means I I I really can't have more than
contempt for them. I'm sick of the French. I am
sick of being half French myself. I does avow it,
fucking does avowed it. I am an angler. I don't
care what you think.
Speaker 3: Of French.
Speaker 5: Enough of called, yes, enough of them to be called
an Anglo Saxon anyway, and I just have the silken eyes.
Speaker 2: Well, let me let me go.
Speaker 1: Ahead and and speak on this a bit that the
things that I would would like to see removed from America.
I want this like you guys already talked about the
removing the poem from the Statue of Liberty. Everyone who
thinks who believes in this anti white lie of Melton Pot,
they need to go away or die. Everyone who is
part of our project should be a free white person
and should be an alignment of values, or they should
be allowed by our graces to operate in areas we control,
and when we do have the racial ethnic strength to flex,
and our bio spirit is the guiding light of our country,
of the countries that we have at that point, I
would like to see Creed's mottoes iconography change to represent that.
And I would like every single person that lives in
our country to know that this country is for white
people of these values. They're largely Christian, I understand that,
and I know that we have a lot of pagan bros.
I think that we should make an allowance for our
values and no one else's like no, no Judaism, no Hinduism,
no Islam, no Buddhism. That stuff out. That stuff's out.
If you're here, you don't practice that. You don't wear
a kippa, you don't wear the yamaka. You don't get
to wear whatever the cloth bag is that makes you
look like a mailbox in London. You don't get to
wear that shit here. You don't get to have a
synagogue or a mosque here. You don't get to do
weird Buddhist and Hindu stuff here. We're not gonna punish
you and persecute you and beat you for it. But
you're not allowed to do that stuff here. So if
you do that stuff, you just get thrown out of
the country goodbye. That's it. Like that, I think is
that is what I want, but it's we're nowhere near
that yet. But those are the things I would like
to see gone. I want the Zionism out. I want
this ridiculous Judeo Christian, anti white lie poison to be
just just every single scrap of it needs to be
burned on the trash heap. And the only place that
any of this stuff needs to exist is in warnings,
is in history of Look what was done to us,
Look how it happened, never again. That's the only way
I want any of this shit to exist at all.
It's just as history and warnings about never letting it
happen again. The Statue of Liberty itself is a beautiful
piece of work. I wouldn't mind keeping it because it
represented I forget exactly the case, but it was around
I think the was it the bi centennial or this,
you know, the centennial or whenever when we got it.
It was like a gift to recognize American achievements or something.
That's pretty cool. I like that. I've been there, I've
seen it, I've walked up it. It's neat. I like it.
I would hate to see it gone because it is
a pretty impressive, interesting thing that was given to us.
But we should take the stupid poem off of it.
I don't know, like that's that's sort of my take
on it. I don't like destroying artwork, but you know,
if we're going to get rid of it, we should
replace it with, like, you know, an even bigger statue
of like Robert E. Lee or buzz Alding or something.
So that's what I have to say on that. Anything.
Any comments you guys have on on.
Speaker 2: That one hundred percent?
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, absolutely?
Speaker 1: Yeah? All righty well, then let's see if anybody has
graced us with some paid chats and we'll read those
and move on. Okay, we refreshed that. Nothing there, Okay,
I don't think we have anything else. A PayPal just
log me out the second I clicked on it, of
course did Yeah?
Speaker 2: That does that?
Speaker 1: Why it only lets you stay logged in for like
two minutes and it kicks you out.
Speaker 2: I hate that?
Speaker 1: All right, Yeah, we're good to move on. We don't
have anything else, so let's drop that and say goodbye
to this awesome blue dragon and bring back up the
topics we just did. Statue to liberty that leaves Department
of Education disaster and the bats came home to roost.
Mister Pete, what will it be next, sir?
Speaker 2: See that bats came home to roost. Honestly, of all
of all of these, that's the one. I have no
idea where you're going with that.
Speaker 1: Okay, this is a video, a short little like minute
and a half clip that we are going to watch
and then look at some stuff underneath the thread on
the twatter. So that is what we will be doing.
So let's go ahead and drop that and this and
then ambigan, Okay, imbigan, here we go. I have a
listen to this.
Speaker 7: I could see how people may feel as if they
cannot ask them because they maybe they did ask them,
and what came back. What they got back not from
their physicians but from somebody else was, oh, well, this
is a conspiracy theory, rather than addressing the question had
on And I know that from my patients, I got
asked questions specifically about the vaccine that they had heard
from somewhere that were important to address and that there
was some truth behind. For example, people were concerned about
the impact of the vaccines on women, were concerned about
the impact of the vaccines on their menstrual periods. Well,
as it turns out, there have been studies that have
shown that there may be some changes to their menstrual
period in the short term. But addressing that is not
a conspiracy theory. It's addressing this question and then saying
here's the research that we know around this, or I
know that for some time. For the first couple of years,
the questions around natural immunity from the immunity that you
get from infection, those questions were all dismissed because, yes,
it is true that we didn't want people to just
go out and have chicken box parties and get infected
all at once. But it's also true that you do
have immunity after not lifelong immunity, but we do get
some degree of pretty good immunity after having infection. So
I think that addressing those nuances and being clear with
people about what we know and what we don't know
and what we believe is the case based on ongoing research.
But this could change. I think that leaning into the
nuances rather than backing away and just saying, well, you're
wrong and I'm right. I think that that may be a.
Speaker 8: Lesson that that that that that we learned, especially because
we also know that if people keep on hearing that
their questions are being dismissed, they're much more likely to
go to the source, as you were saying, like an
RFK junior, who will say, well, let's ask this question,
and you know what, if we can ask this question,
why not also this question if they're if you think
they're lying to you about this, then maybe they're also
lying to you about X, Y and Z.
Speaker 1: Well that's because they are now speaking of liars. This
non white, anti white piece of shit is named doctor
Leanna Wynn. Now, many of you who have been keyed
into things for quite some time, we'll remember this, this
particular demon because let me scroll down here. Somebody summed
it up very well. Where is this one? No, it's
not that one, you know, I hate it?
Speaker 2: How Oh?
Speaker 1: Here we go. There it is. Now, let's inbig into
bit so you guys can see this better. Uh, here
we go, doctor Lida Winn. Just in case you guys
have forgotten, this is the timeline of truth. According to
this poster mister Harry Fisher. Doctor Wynn was one of
the most prominent voices during the scamdemic. She appeared regularly
on CNN as a medical analyst. She wrote opinion pieces
for The Washington Post. She was the former Baltimore Health Commissioner.
She wielded enormous influence over public perception and policy during
the height of COVID. She consistently dismissed concerns about the
vaccine side effects, advocated for mandates and restrictions on the unvaccinated,
ridiculed those questioning official narratives, and let us not forget.
Was also a proponent of saying that the unvaccinated should
be disallowed from public interaction. She was one of those turns.
So let's see this goes on. By the way, when
women first reported minstrel changes after vaccination, they were mocked
in dis missed, Social media censored the reports, medical professionals
gas lit patience. Research funding was denied. Only after millions
of women experience these effects did researchers finally start to
conduct studies confirming what women knew was happening all along.
Evidence for robust natural immunity was available before the scandemic,
reports supported by over one hundred and fifty studies consistent
with basic immunology deliberately ignored to promote universal vaccination. According
to this poster, here's the deeper pattern. This isn't about
being wrong. It reveals a systemic, a systematic approach. Label
concerns as conspiracy theories to avoid addressing them, Sensor and
punish those raising legitimate questions, delay investigation until after the
policies are implemented. Quietly admit the truth years later when
accountability is unlikely. Never acknowledge the harm done by suppressing information. Now,
let's see what a dragon might have to say on
all of this, shall we? All right, let's kill that.
Go back to the regular view, which I think is
this one now?
Speaker 2: Ah?
Speaker 1: It is? I remembered the green. The green with us
tonight is the same elder worm who has come to
speak with us before about COVID stuff. She's glad to
be back. She is especially glad to see the truth
about what went on in the COVID era finally being
talked about openly. But that brings along other concerns such
as this, Pete, you chose this one, so it comes
to you with the official walk backs and experts changing
their tune. Do you think that suggests another pandemic scam
on the public won't happen again, or is it something else?
Speaker 2: I mean, I think it can be both. I think
they could try another pandemic scam. I have a tendency
to that it won't have anything to do with like
a virus. I think they'll try to do climate change
or something like that. There was actually there was a
town in India last year that was closed that everybody
was told to stay home because of quote unquote climate
change kind of. I mean it's India. I mean, you're
breathing shit when you walk outside of outside of the house.
What are you talking about. I have a tendency to
believe that, and it is something else. These people see
that a country elected Donald Trump. Whether you think whatever
you think of Donald Trump. You know I've said this.
People have to realize this. It's not Donald Trump, it's
what he signifies. People are sick of the shit and
they they want something different. I think they are scared.
I think they don't want to be lined up. I
think they don't want to have to face a wall.
I think they don't want to see gallows being built
and they see that, you know. I mean, I don't
know if she was one of the people who got
a electronic pen pardon or anything, but yeah, these these
people are scared. Someone one of these women tried to
write an article in The Atlantic I think it was
in twenty twenty three, like, oh, you know, we didn't know.
You know, it's like if we would have known, and
everybody was like, no, no, we're not not. Ye, yeah,
we're not, we're not by You're scared right now. You're
scared that one day this is going to catch up
with you. And that person even ended up changing the
title of the article or something like that. Yeah, these
people are scared that you're that they're going to have
to answer for this one day. And it's not that
they're going to have to answer really to the government
or to a court. They're scared they're going to have
to answer to the public.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because like not not to mention the sterilizations that happened,
the forced vaccination of kids, God knows what that's going
to do to people's children down the road. I think
that these people are scared that so many millions of
us know that we were had and we were lied
to by people like her, and I do think that
they're scared. Pete.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm sorry, no, no, please go.
Speaker 4: So, as you know, this is something of my wheelhouse. Oh,
definitely in the sort of related stuff very extensively. I
don't think they can do another pandemic scam, especially in
the US. There have been a couple of tries already.
There's been the bird flu thing which just got shut down.
That has been you know, Mameasle's pandemic, which also has
not gotten the kind of traction. The fact of the
matter is really that it took a whole of government approach,
backed by the usual suspects, in order to make all
this happen.
Speaker 3: So there've been a couple of news items recently that
I'd just like to point out.
Speaker 4: The first thing is that there has finally been an
admission by the UK government that Mi Sixter informed Boris
Johnson that COVID was almost certainly a lab league from Wuhan,
and then allegedly the scientists convinced him otherwise.
Speaker 3: I don't believe this.
Speaker 4: I think I think Boris Johnson is a deep state
puppet to the core, and he basically ignored this advice
and the second thing is this was just from today,
is that apparently Trump has said that because all the
pardons that Biden signed were signed via auto pen, they
are not valid, which means that Fauci's pardon is not valid,
and a bunch of these COVID creatures their pardons are
not valid, which means that there is it is entirely
likely that there will in fact be a trial. Now
myself and many other people would love to see Vaucci
stand trial, and I think that people like when.
Speaker 3: They are essentially trying to leverage the short memory of
the public. However, social media has made this.
Speaker 4: You know, you often hear how people say, oh, social
media has made people's attention spans shorter.
Speaker 3: I'm not actually sure that's the case.
Speaker 1: No, no, no.
Speaker 4: Back in the day, you used to have a media cycle.
You know, it was just newspapers and people would forget
about stuff. But social media, now you have a committed
group of autists, which I think all of us here
number among yes, that are keeping this evidence alive.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: You know, back in the day, you couldn't just disseminate
a clip from CNN showing what this person said a
couple of years ago. Now just to address some of
the stuff about you know, when that tweet you talked
about was very Germane.
Speaker 3: The menstrual regularities was one.
Speaker 4: Of the first symptoms that sort of that really came
to light, and that poster was correct. It was widely
dismissed despite just overwhelming anecdotal evidence. Then there was the
Phiser biodistribution leak from Japan in a rap model that
showed conclusively that the vaccine collected primarily in places like
the ovaries and the spleen and thus would be expected
to cause reproductive effects. I mean, it's just I mean
the way she glosses over this, Oh, you know the
vaccine caused menstrual regularities.
Speaker 3: Well, why does no one remember right that? Oh remember,
oh it it stays in your arm bro Right, it
doesn't migrate to any of your organs.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 3: That was not only a complete and utter lie, but
they knew it was a lie.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: The entire science behind lip nano particles is that they
disperse widely.
Speaker 3: That's the whole, their whole point. Oh my god, this
makes me so angry.
Speaker 4: I really hope that at the very least these people
are fired from their positions in medicine. And academia and
disgrace people like when like Lena, when Hotez, Barrack, Fauci.
Speaker 3: All of these people who just dismissed you know, I mean,
it's it's it's terrible, it's it's really really terrible.
Speaker 4: I think they I think Peter's right. I think they
are worried that if.
Speaker 1: It was up to me, all these people would have
a fair trial and they'd be publicly hung from the
neck till dead.
Speaker 4: Yes, I think, I think, I really think a strong
example has to be made of these people. I think
for far too long, people in these kinds of positions
have essentially been of the mind that no matter how
badly they screw up, the worst that can happen to
the worst thing that can happen to them is that
they are fired with a massive.
Speaker 3: Severance and retirement.
Speaker 4: And that is not enough of a disincentive to stop
them from pulling this shit. Right, there have to be
very serious consequences. So the next motherfucker that tries this right,
in the next group of people sitting around a table like, oh,
you know, maybe we could do this stuff, they will
be like, oh, yeah, remember what happened to Fauci, Right,
you want to be hanging by a lamp post while
a bunch of Trump supporters like throw stones.
Speaker 3: That you crotch. Maybe we shouldn't do this. An example
has to be made.
Speaker 1: I hope, so, man, I hope. So we'll see three.
You got anything to say on this one?
Speaker 5: I mean, it's letter. This is really that new, especially
considering everything that Newsfits just said. I mean, we knew
that the Wuha lab was connected to the original or
COVID since February of twenty twenty a chainey saints came
out and said it, and then we had this that
can fall like three times. The second time was with
the realization that Eco Alliance was contracted to make it
alongside the Chinese scientists in the Wuhan lab, and that
the Chinese scientists were such bugmen they forgot to add
functionality of effectiveness to bats to it when they released
it into the Wuhan cave, so then it basically spread
into the air and became completely uncontrollable infected humans in
a more natural process of jumping from animals to humans
from that point, and had nothing to do with wet
bats in a market anywhere, because there's never been any
evidence of that, and the fact that I still see
this story spread around occasionally just shows how these people
will never give up anything, whether I admit they're sorry
or what they did was wrong, or that they'll be
accountable to the public, all that stuff. They're afraid of
being accountable to the public. They don't care if of
other powerful people know, because they're not the real threat.
Speaker 1: They don't care.
Speaker 5: They were in on it too, They're all in on it.
What matters is that they fear being tard and there
to being houng. Like you said, it's what they truly fear,
because if one person gets hung, they might just squawk.
They might just squawk for everyone, and then the entire
system crumbles and then there's no more free money that
they can steal from us. There's no more you know,
like there's no more champagne socialist lifestyles anymore. That things
like Donald Trump being elected happens, and that they dig
into the regime and start taking stuff apart. They are
absolutely terrified of what's going on right now. Every single
day they're terrified. They see it as the last days
of their regime collapsing, and they're reaching towards increasingly unrealistic
ways to get people to do things in their name,
and they just they've lost control at this point. In fact,
a new poll this came out on Democratic approval. It's
down to twenty nine percent and it has a disapproval
rate of oh god, I didn't even see I think
it was over sixty percent. So there's this any group
in the middle that's ampivalent, but it was apparently it's
the lowest rate that Seenn has ever recorded. The Democratic
Party has collapsed because they support terrorists. I mean, don't
do I even have to mention like the sort of
r slash drama tier stuff where like Hassan is supporting
Hamas and he's having mental breakdowns on the NY and uh.
This is basically a reflection of the entire left wing
in general, and all the Reddit posts of people like
inverting their their skin because there they see the end
of their lives coming. Uh to Okay, So to bring
that all home, I don't think that they knew. I
don't think that this is a this is connected to
a new pandemic. I think that if they're doing it,
they're doing it and it was going to happen because
they plan these sorts of things years out In fact,
was it just last week that we that it was
exposed that the USDA lab in the Southern United States
did to gain a function research on the bird food
stream that led to the us DONDA killing one hundred
million chickens. Yep, it already happened, dude, it already happened.
It's coming gone, and it's already over, thankfully because they're
not in power, or else they would have probable to
use it as leverage for a new pandemic, at the
very least to destroy our diets.
Speaker 1: Well, the last thing I'll say on this one is
I don't think like it's sort of like what Yusas
was talking about. I think that a bunch of evil
people that were all like your Fauci's and your Bill
gates Is and all them. I think that they already
had this plandemic scamdemic thing cooked up, and they were
waiting for the right time. And when Trump was denied
office and wet fark Biden became president and everything started
to go off the rails, and all of these anti
white global homo people like your Soroses and all were like, yeah,
let's dial the anti white shit up to one hundred
we're going to have, you know, riots, We're going to
push the global communism and all this shit, the gay
race communism, so to speak. I think that the people
who wanted to do this plandemic to steal trillions of dollars,
to destroy small businesses, and to disempower those who don't
want to live in the technocratic hell that people like
Gates and Fauci want, they just seized upon an opportunity.
And I don't know if that opportunity will come again, because,
not only like what Eustace said, the way that we
share information and the thousands of us that are dedicated
to informing the millions of us who are aware, it
would be very difficult to pull a stunt like that again.
Now it's possible for it to be done along the
lines of something else, like Pete brought up the climate
change shit. I was alive during nine to eleven. I
remember how that changed things and how crazy it made everyone.
There could be a big terror thing again, a big
terror stunt. That might be a way to do it, but.
Speaker 2: I don't That was that was my prediction after the election,
was the easiest way to turn people and make people
forget about everything that Trump had promised to do was
to have another nine to eleven. And it's not out
of the rama possibility.
Speaker 1: No, certainly not, because sorry, let me finish real quick.
Then we'll go to you news Fist because I remember
that too, because right before Trump got elected, we remember
the big crazy drone thing that happened, and people were like, oh,
it's iron or whatever. We knew that was bullshit. Nothing
ever came that. But one of the things I said
on my stream was this might be a preface to
the next big nine to eleven to make everyone forget
the COVID years and to regalvanize America into the new line.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: I said that on stream. You guys can go back
and find it. Go ahead and news Fist.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I agree with you. Actually I was, I
think you.
Speaker 1: Were there yet.
Speaker 4: I was doing a better research on you know, like
you know, what's happening with Europe and stuff like that,
and the public feeling against going to war with Russia
for you know, basically no reason is so intense that
the only sort of real way I can see forward
for them is some kind of mass casualty event. There
doesn't seem to sort of any other way, But it
would be very very convenient. You know, it would allow
sort of implementation much harsher laws reintroduced conscription, just you know,
all kinds of like very convenient stuff. Wait again to
do that thing. A couple of years ago, I actually
predicted that after COVID, the next thing would be war,
and I think I might have been right on that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, guys, we don't have any paid chats to
get to, so we can just move back to the
dragons and do the last topic. Well bitted you to
this beautiful green dragon and go to the topics. All right,
that was the bats came home the rust, which means
the white dragon is the last and that will be
the Department of Education disaster. Now, since there's no choice
to be made here, Pete, the choice is do you
want to be the first one to answer the question
when it comes up? Or do you want it to
be someone else?
Speaker 2: Let it be someone else?
Speaker 1: All right, who shall it be, mister party leader?
Speaker 2: Oh? Three? Go ahead?
Speaker 1: All right, this will be for three of twelve then,
all right, moving to just the news. Obama rule banning
racial disparities in school discipline could be mixed under the
federal guidance schools are required to discipline students equally by race,
regardless of how much students actually acted up and needed discipline.
Schools that refuse to do so could lose federal funding.
A parental rights group sent a letter to the US
Department of Education Thursday calling on it to undo an
Obama and Biden error rule warning schools that if they
discipline minority students more than white students, they could lose
federal funding regardless of how many acts incidents require discipline.
Parents Defending Education sent a letter pointing to a Dear
Colleague letter sent out by the Biden admin, calling it
unlawful and unconstitutional. Letters of this kind are how Education
Department issues new guidance for schools and lets them know
what they could lose federal funding for if they don't comply.
The colleague letter in question is the school Discipline letter
issued by the Dealey At and the Department of Justice
in May of twenty twenty three, which argued that racial
disparities and discipline at public schools were a result of
you guessed it racism, despite clear Supreme Court precedent holding
that disparate impact alone does not support a title for violation.
The school discipline letter states that racial disparities in school
discipline outcomes are a prima facie evidence of racial discrimination. Now,
for those of you who don't know what that means,
it means if it in a school by number, not
per capita, not per case. If in a school more
non whites are punished than whites, they will yank your funding.
That's what that means. Now. President Obama instituted this policy
in twenty fourteen, but it was overturned during Donald Trump's
first term, only to be reinstituted by Biden. Now the
PDE is calling for Trump to overturn it again. So
let's leave that off there and move to the dragon.
Then the white is this gorgeous one here? I love
this piece of art. The White with us tonight is
a mystic and a seer who spends her time divining
upon complex worlds like Earth to better understand human societies.
She's learned that America's problems, beyond whider rasure and growing
inflation rely are particularly involved with the failings of mass education.
So that's what her question is about tonight three of twelve.
If this comes to you first, do you think removing
standardized education would help fix America's other problems. And what regulations,
if any, do you think should exist for education.
Speaker 5: I do, I definitely do, because it would get rid
of rules like this where you can simply have a
schoolhouse in your town and you run it the way
that you want and there's no weird regulatory body demanding
that you essentially treat people based on the race, with
some sort of critical race theory race consciousness nonsense. I mean,
as far as I can tell from the article that
this rule is, like you said, it's non per capita base.
Speaker 1: So if you have it also has to do with
equality of outcome, which is incredibly communist.
Speaker 5: Yes, yes, it is. It is entirely egalitarian. It's it's
equity instead of equality, where you don't treat people the
same and you punish them based on what they've done. Said,
it's just an arbitrary rule saying well, if there's more
there's more whites that get if there's more non whites
that get punished than whites, no matter what the demographics
of the actual school are, then their funding gets pulled.
That's just racism.
Speaker 2: It is.
Speaker 5: It is just racism and simple.
Speaker 1: Yes, and goes one way.
Speaker 5: It always goes one way. Yeah, it's outrageous, it's arbitrary,
and Trump needs to get rid of it again. If
he got rid of it the first time, he just
get rid of it a second time. In fact, I
think I think that's why you're not seeing a lot
of these little things getting touched, because since the emphasis
is to absolutely gut and then remove the Department of Education,
why do you need to touch any of these things.
A lot of people need to be more pet patient
on this sort of stuff. If they're going for the
big shot on this, If the process leads to the
Department of Education being removed completely, you don't need to
touch any of this stuff, and they need to prioritize
what the best use of their power is. Genuinely think
the answer is just get rid of the Department of Education,
like the answer framing is.
Speaker 1: Implying things Trump announced he was going to acts.
Speaker 5: Right, Yes, he's already massively it's already been massively gutted.
I think tens of thousands of jobs have been removed
from it already as well as other so we've made
inroads on that, right. I think. I think when the
time comes, Trump's going to tell Congress to frame up
a full more removal of it, as he's been doing
with other things, because every once in a while he's like, Okay,
we're ready, tell Congress to get ready on framing legislation
for this thing, and I'm sure he'll get to That's
that's that's my assumption. Some of you are more skeptical,
but I say the proof is in the pudding. I
don't pretend to I don't pretend to know the future.
I can only I only hope that he does what
he's promising. And he's not secretly somehow a Blairite that
just thinks he can do whatever he wants. And the
second part of the question, well, we already have the
answer to that. The states have their own rules for
how it's handled, and they can do that without instituting
public school systems. They can have charter schools they really
want them. In fact, I mean I proved there's plenty
of proof that public schools and charter schools performed better anyway,
because then when Hurricane Katrina absolutely wrecked New Orleans, virtually
all of the public school infrastructure was destroyed. It was
just a coincidence and collateral damage. So they had to
try something radical in order to keep one the budget
down of rebuilding the system. So they had a unique opportunity,
so they went for it. They made every single school
in the New Orleans area charter school, and they went
from like the worst in the nation to one of
the best overnight. They still have one of the highest
They still have one of the highest percentages of proficiencies
and reading in math and writing. So I do think
that there there's going to be a reckoning when that happens. If,
for the if the Department of Education goes away, I
think you're going to continue to see homeschooling increase. I
mean there's already been like what ten increase in the
last ten years, because there's anything that's happened.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'll talk about that a lot on this channel. Yeah,
it's it's been huge.
Speaker 5: I think. I mean the answer, the answer is to
get rid of the Department of Education because as soon
as we got it, because since we've since we set
it up, we've gone from being second or third in
the world depending on indexes you choose, to fortieth, and
I think that's absolutely unacceptable and we need the money
spent back and we need it put back in our
in our pockets so that we can pick what we
want to do with their education, just like the whole.
It's it's the whole, like choose your system thing. But
more to the point, just give people back.
Speaker 1: Their money, understood, and also give parents and communities back
the power to decide what, what and how their children
are taught.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well, they don't want that because obviously a sustainable,
self sustaining, stable, unified community is the thing that will
tear them apart in the end of the day.
Speaker 1: All right, let's hear from someone else then, Pete.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm gonna have to go a little bit further
on this because I've been I've been having discussions recently
on education. Do I think that, Do I think the
Department of Education is going to be dismantled? I don't know,
I mean it, Yeah, you you see so much if
you're on Twitter where it's like it's over the Department
of Education is gone, and then you know, you don't
know if at this point, if it isn't in Trump's
truth social feed, I don't really believe it, And then
I don't really you know, I'll believe it when I
see it kind of thing. That's pretty fair it's it's hard. Okay,
So if you're gonna send it back to the States,
I would I think that's what should be done, because
that's the practical thing.
Speaker 5: But what you're less eggsting sending it back to the states.
I'm seeing that the states already do it, and yet
they get trumped on by an unconstitutional federal agency that
shouldn't have any authority to tell them anything.
Speaker 2: Right, Right, What I was going to say is is
that you still have the problem of us being this
fifty states and having this nesh. I mean where you know,
an election in Georgia can affect people who live three
thousand miles away. I mean, I'm at the point with
education where I think, at like twelve or thirteen years old,
people should there should be some kind of testing to
see if they're even they should even be in school,
and they shouldn't even they should start going into apprenticing
in the trades or something like that. Yeah, there's no
reason we have to have people in kids in schools.
It's to get them out and around adults, because when
they get out of school, they're going to be around adults.
Keeping them in school the whole time. Just being around
kids their own age doesn't help them grow up, it
actually retards their maturity.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of data to back that up
to Pete that you're not just whistling Dixie there, Like,
there's a lot of data on this, well social.
Speaker 5: Integration only be like other kids.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I was one of those kids who, like,
in fifth grade, I was reading at a college I
tested at a college level reading. There was no reason
I should have been even better around these freakin mutants.
But the Yeah, I think that's where we have to go.
I think that's the state, the first state that takes
that approach of you know, a I mean a real
honest Prussian education where it's like, okay, how how is
this person going to best best be utilized for their culture,
for their for their race, for their people. Yeah. That
that that's where that state that does that will be
the model, will will probably stagnate for a little while
and then will jump ahead of all other states as
far as education goes and as far as having progress goes.
That's just the way. It's the way we have to
go back to. Yeah, the way that people were educated
in the past, you had these people who were obviously
standouts who needed to be around people who were well
well educated in letters. And then you have to have
people that you can just teach how you can teach
how to fix an engine, how to you just how
to turn wrenches and or you know, do plumbing things
like that. There is no reason that we the fact
that we push these people push to be like, oh yeah,
you have to go to college. It's like, well, I
mean I was reading I saw something recently and said
that if we went back to like completely merit based education,
like zero point five percent of the blacks that make
it into medical school, it would be zero point five
percent of the blacks that are going in medical school
right now would be in there. Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely, you.
Speaker 1: Just brought up the over education. That's another problem. The
way that schools work and have worked for decades now,
is a never ending money farm. It's sort of like
it's one of the many line go up problems of well, well,
to compete, these businesses require this. Everyone wants his or
her child to succeed, so everyone wants the child to
go get the college degree, so everyone forces their kids
into debt. And why well, because the price continues to
go up because all these universities are on are connected
to the never ending money printing machine of the federal government.
And it's just it's just this miserable, never ending pit
of oh, more money, more debt, more worthless degrees, more
people leading unfulfilled lives because they not only do they
have they've been lied to their whole lives about getting
a good job and having a good life. Now they're
in debt, and they don't have necessary life skills and
people skills to work outside of that collegiate infantilism experience
of being in school the first twenty five years of
your life. Like most people shouldn't be on that path.
Really gifted, intelligent academics with the mind for history and
philosophy and all these other things that actually require academic stuff,
those are the only people that should be in that system.
The rest of us should live lives and get trade
skills and learn specific crafts and not spend twenty five
years of our lives being babysat just to go into debt,
just to have worse lives. Like I get so fired
up about this, it makes me.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 4: Yeah, look, I think standardized education, I mean, I mean
the reason they sort of started it was you know,
partially for the integration of the nation state, and partially
too because of the mechanization of labor and all this
kind of other stuff. But standardized education has always been
sort of a way of forcing conformity. But now with
all the racial stuff the UK is going through exactly
the same thing. Like the new new education head of
Education in the UK's is literally a nimmam, Like.
Speaker 3: It's my god, it's just so retarded.
Speaker 4: And the problem really is that if you have standardized education,
you have a single point of failure. Right If an
ideology begins to infest whoever it is that sets the
standard for education, then this downstreams into the entirety of society.
Speaker 3: And I think this was a deliberate move.
Speaker 4: I mean when it was the Department of Education set
up like nineteen seventy something, that's a very interesting year, right.
You know what happened to all of the hippie communists
Right after they stopped like fuffing around and like blowing
stuff up, they all decided to go into education. Yep, right,
So you know this is it would not be a
stretch to say that the way the Department of Education
was set up was directly for communists and doctrination, and
look at what has happened to education standards in the
US and indeed all over the world.
Speaker 1: Like I'm old, right, Chris, I'm forty five, Yeah, and
what The first five grades that I went to one
through five was at a private Christian school ran by
people from my area. It was heritage American Appalachians with
a Christian school just for heritage Christian Apple actions. It
was a wonderful experience. I was reading at almost a
college level by the time I was ten. I understood
mathematic and algebra and all this other stuff. We had
good chemistry classes like it taught children awesome stuff. It
was a great school. And then because my parents splitting
up and a bunch of other crap and having to
move and all this stuff, I had to I had
to go to a public school in middle school and
there were like twelve hundred kids there and one of
the only three or four non white students got angry
because I was taking too long at a water fountain
and stabbed me in the leg with her pencil the
first week I was there. So that's my experience of
private school versus public school.
Speaker 4: So I actually had a similar experience, Right Like, I
originally went to a very very.
Speaker 1: By the way, I still have the lead from that
pencil in my hip to this day. I could show
it to you. I'll show it to at the next
OGC event.
Speaker 4: I originally went to a very good private school and
then junior area concatenation of unfortunate events, switched over to
one of the worst public schools in Sydney. And I
mean it did give me a sudden, you know, interesting
take on life, you know, being sort of like raised
into sort of economic classes as it were. But even
back then, you could see the pause at the start
of the pause, you know, when I when I, when
I look back, Australia was very very much in the
leading edge of what would eventually come to be known
as woke and anti white and all that stuff. Right Like,
even even when I was back then, there was still
you know, very anti male and all this stuff. It
was it was just it was just sort of really
starting to spin up the other. The other thing, of course,
is that and and this is sort of the underlying
thing of a lot of this stuff, is that we
have got to bring back freedom of association. Right it
should be perfectly acceptable to say that you want your
child to only go to school around Christians, or that
you only want you want your child to only go
to school around whites, or just any other kind of
freedom of association.
Speaker 1: And also there's nothing wrong or moral about that. It's
the most nau normal thing for humans to want to
associate that way.
Speaker 3: There's nothing Norman Bout's an eyelid. Right if.
Speaker 4: They want their child to go to a Jewish school
to be around other Jews, or a Muslim parents say
they want their child to go to or Muslim school
and it's only whites where this is, this is looked
down on, This is seen as somehow bad or CD
or you know, oh my god, there has got to
be at the very least a normalization where the same
rights apply to same groups. Right, and then and then
you know the problem is of course, right, like what
are you going to do with all of the insane,
subtarted immigrants that have been brought in?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 3: I mean, I have seen this happen so many times.
Speaker 4: It only takes like a few people in a class
to just completely.
Speaker 3: Disrupt it for everyone.
Speaker 4: Right, If you if you get a couple of like
proper subcharts in a classroom, nobody else can can learn.
And this, this has disrupted education all over the West.
You know, the sort of examples of an online are legion,
you've got to, You've got to.
Speaker 3: But this is the point.
Speaker 4: The government is absolutely the governments across the West, the
UK particularly, they're trying.
Speaker 3: I think they've just banned homeschooling.
Speaker 4: They are loath to let people homeschool because the whole
one of the big functions of schooling is to indoctrinate
the children into the dominant.
Speaker 3: Paradigm right and in their parents.
Speaker 1: I think the word you're looking for is the moral
imperative of the moral order of the regime. Yes, and currently,
sadly right now, it's the anti white narrative. It's the
the Hitler boogeyman. Any whites who love themselves are the
externalized evil narrative.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, yeah, so yeah, I don't know. I mean,
it's interesting what people are saying about how he's not
sure whether they'll abolish the Department of Education.
Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe not.
Speaker 4: I mean, even if they just downsize it massively and
give much more power back to the states, I think
I think it would be a good thing. I think
generally you can tell that the governments, as I said,
are just loath to give up that sort of control
that they have over the minds of the of the young.
Speaker 1: All right, well, I think that's it. And we are
banging on the hour mark at eight o'clock, So mister
Pete canonez we have a few memes to look at
in a funny video. Would you like to stay a
little longer? You need to bounce since it's on the.
Speaker 2: Hour, sure, go ahead, all right, all right.
Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and bit at you to this lovely
white dragon here. And it's treasure time, ladies and gentlemen.
We have made it. We have made it. Now. I
would like to shill for myself real quick before we
before we move on, I am showing you now two pictures.
We'll start with this one. This is a birdseye view
of the wonderful state Park, the Lakeside Park, where I
will be hosting my spring picnic, my meetup event that
I like to have in April, in about one month's time,
April twelfth, that's the second Saturday of April. I'm renting
a nice pavilion where we're going to grill bacon, rap
port chops and burgers that I make and stuff like that.
Here's another picture you can see. This is a ground
level view of the marina where you can rent barges
and do fun stuff here. If you would like to
come just off of Interstate eighty one in eastern Tennessee
for a full day Saturday event of grilling and hanging
out with other based heritage Americans who are pro white,
let me know, send me an email, use the Unicut
ProtonMail dot com, reach out to me on social media,
leave a comment on videos, etc. Let me know to
get in touch with you privately, vet you and make
sure that you know where you're coming. This is a
fun event. I've been hosting them for years. Some people
in the chat have even been before. I still have
about five spots. So if any of you would like
to get in on this, reach out and let me know. Okay,
all right, we're going to go ahead and drop this
and now we are going to go to the memes.
So starting with this one right here, Tesla autopilot drove
into a wiley coyote style fake road wall in the
middle of the road in a camera versus lidar test.
I thought this was just hilarious. Because I love Looney Tunes.
Next up, we have another good vance meme, Vance Halen.
I thought this was quite good. Is this makes me happy?
You guys see this, it's kind out of control.
Speaker 4: I like it.
Speaker 1: I like it. Next up, I've reached three hundred meters
under the seat. The pressure here is immense. All the
cool kids do drugs. All the cool kids. You say, yeah,
I saw this one many years ago. But this is
a different iteration on the same meme, and I thought
I thought i'd share it tonight.
Speaker 2: It's a dad joke meme.
Speaker 4: It is.
Speaker 1: I shared dad jokes opatially because sometimes they make me laugh.
I love the waiting to Pooh one. Here arec Codd
dysfunctioned Ballzheimer's.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna use that. You should.
Speaker 1: It's funny.
Speaker 3: It's funny.
Speaker 1: I like this one. The the healthcare triangle of fast,
good and cheap. You've got the Canadian over here. Have
you considered yourself. You've got me that'll be one hundred
grand to cash your credit up here. Then you've got
to come back in eighty three weeks over here.
Speaker 5: These memes because in mayty percent of people are insured
in the United States, like they're never gonna have to
pay these sort of the Europeans actually think we pay
these place is No, they don't know.
Speaker 3: They don't, Yeah, they do. They think that maybe.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, none of the ones I talk to do.
Maybe I just talk to smart people.
Speaker 3: I don't know, all right.
Speaker 1: Next up, I like this. Please do not confuse your
half assed research on internet forums with my graduate degree
in political silence as science. Oh, a graduate degree in
poli sci. Well, then I'll have a vente latte. Then, please, I.
Speaker 3: Retired to take on hobbs to you. Yeah, I love that,
Oh my god?
Speaker 2: All right.
Speaker 1: Next up, when people claim that homeschooled kids are not socialized,
I'd like to point out that this is the opinion
of someone who's spent thirteen years asking for permission to
speak and use the bathroom, doing tricks for teres isn't socialization.
It's dog training. Try if I have the urge to
sniff my ass when I walk by nice, I'm king
of the jungle. I'm John Wick's dog. Oh well, then
let me kiss nine Paul. Not only is this cute,
it's a good John Wick joke.
Speaker 2: I like this one.
Speaker 3: I like this one.
Speaker 1: In this world neo. You can be anything you want.
He turns into a space Breen. Then Morphys turns into
a space Breen. Oh shit, I like this one. Uh
this is I saw this months ago, but it's still funny.
Please cooperate and then whatever this is, and here's the
picture that took it from It's funnier the longer you
look at it.
Speaker 5: God, I've been watching all of those live PD shows
and this every single fucking goddamn TI.
Speaker 3: Just like, stop doing what you're doing.
Speaker 5: You're going on to stop, just please just stop.
Speaker 1: And then and then the Purp gives the Coppa every
reason to shoot him. Yes, yeah, every time. All right,
I love this one. I hate that September, October, November,
and December aren't the seventh, eighth and ninth, seventh, eighth,
ninth and tenth months. Whoever fucked this up should be stabbed. Well,
I have an excellent news for you. Ah, oh man,
this is great. I love this well. I have excellent
news for you. The funk that beeping is Celand Perds. Yeah,
I love that one. Oh, thank you, Pete, thank you,
thank you. Here's a good suicide squad meme.
Speaker 2: I like this one.
Speaker 1: You gotta see this. I love this one. The Abraham Saga,
Jewish Adventures, Jewish Adventures to Return of the jew Jewish
Adventures three, Revenge of Mohammed, and Jewish Adventures four Jews
Go to America. I'm sorry, Jesus goes to America. I've
bet I got a kick out of this one. I
like that, and you guys know that I love to
end the meme segment with the George Floyd meme I
haven't seen, and today I present you with this. I
can't leave. Yes, thank you, amazing.
Speaker 5: All right, full and snocky they want the land back.
Speaker 1: Okay, Well, just to remind you guys, the sister stream
to this is called disc is not discording Dragons. That's
my stream Goodness, is called Dragon Synth Adventures over on
four Null's channel. And I am fairly certain he will
be streaming this evening. Yes, he already has it up.
Very good. I'm sharing the link and all the chat
now after this stream ends here in a few minutes,
please come join me here. This is where I hang
out after my stream. This guy is a nice, well
spoken white dude who hosts excellent artwork of the fantasy
and science fiction variety. While he plays really cool synth
wave music of the science fiction and sci fi variety
and an all it's just an all around chill stream
and a lot of my friends hang out there, so
you can come hang out with me too. The one
thing that I have prepared for us is only a
one minute funny and I promised you guys one of
my New Year's resolutions on the stream is I was
going to show you more old school Bradneelee comedy, and
this week we are going to be looking at Bring
the gold. Bring the Gold is my little brad Neeelee
tribute to Saint Patrick's day.
Speaker 3: So here we go.
Speaker 1: Enjoy this one minute of ridiculous comedy.
Speaker 6: Bring the Golden. I'll bring me sack.
Speaker 2: Don't be looking for no trouble.
Speaker 3: I've got Prince to watch me back. See bring the cold.
Speaker 6: All the wishes I don't grant, but I'll grant you
golden showers, Irish, Bring in from me pants, yeah, kind,
I'm gonna sucking.
Speaker 1: Marry I brother with me.
Speaker 3: Fucking kinds.
Speaker 1: Shoes sure if they be nailed or golden horse, bring
the colder.
Speaker 6: I'll bring the pants in to mental or the tenter
if it's gold it's all the same sea.
Speaker 3: Bring the colton.
Speaker 1: Try to trick me with your ass, because I don't
only fucking.
Speaker 3: Do you if you bore a golden glass.
Speaker 6: You know I don't give a fuck about your back
in cash. Keep your fucking cash to line your panties.
Speaker 2: Bring the cold.
Speaker 3: You know who I am. I won't kill you fucking softly.
I will kill you like a ham seed.
Speaker 1: Bring the cold.
Speaker 6: I want every kind, every fucking golden morsel, every golden
thing is made. Another funny story. The Rainbow goes nowhere
point being. Saint Patrick's a quief.
Speaker 3: It is my holiday nice.
Speaker 2: The Irish are weird and everything.
Speaker 1: I love Bradon Ealee comedy. It's so bizarre and weird,
and there's tons of little references in there. There was
a Goldfinger reference in there. There was a book of
Mormon golden plates in there that are all kinds of
little like half a second references. He represents with funny
little cartoon drawings and stuff. It's so great. All right, Well, guys,
we have reached the end of the stream big Oh no,
we just got a paid message pop up over on entropy.
We are not at the end just yet. Five more
dollars from kiss a gt Over on entropy. Comprehensive education
was created under the false notion that grammar school education
was discriminatory against poor kids, when it was actually discriminatory
against the slow, stupid, and disruptive meritocracy. Must return with
the vengeance. Yes, sir, we will be getting there, I hope,
all right. And I'll check all the other sites one
more time, just to make sure, since I stopped to
read kisses. Okay, nothing there, nothing there.
Speaker 3: I'll PayPal.
Speaker 1: You're so slow, make you so slow?
Speaker 3: PayPal?
Speaker 1: All right, nothing on PayPal either, Pete Quinones, thank you
for being here again. Adding your experience and knowledge is
always a treat. Thank you for being here. I hope
you had a good time.
Speaker 2: I appreciate the invitation, always, always, always, How can I
not have a good time? And can't wait. We'll be
able to make it up to Tennessee for your gets together,
but we will definitely be hanging out at the OGC.
Speaker 1: I can't wait, and I look forward to breaking bread
with you again and all the brothers news Fist three
of twelve. You're both my friends and co hosts. Thank
you for being here tonight, and of course we all
missed academic, listen to me American elitist, and hopefully we'll
see you again in a few weeks when your work
schedule can sort that out.
Speaker 3: As for now, I love you all.
Speaker 1: I will see you next week. Just a reminder, there's
no Empire of Lives this week. Chris is still on vacation,
but we will be back Monday. I will of course
be having Discord at Rastdraggons and Chris will be back
next week and we will be doing an Empire Flies episode.
Speaker 2: So come with me.
Speaker 1: Now over to four Knoll's channel for Dragon Synth Adventures.
Have a blessed week, Stay wide, everybody, good night.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna hey, thanks all right.
Speaker 5: See