Speaker 1: You want to hear an interesting coincidence.
Speaker 2: I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
Speaker 1: But on nine to eleven, on the actual day, September eleventh,
Speaker 1: there are four planes. Two hit the World Trade Centers,
Speaker 1: one hits the Pentagon. The fourth, which was late Flight
Speaker 1: ninety three, wound up crashing in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. We know
Speaker 1: that the Vice President gave an order to shoot that
Speaker 1: plane down because understandably by the way I believed it
Speaker 1: was headed into Washington, which I think it was. Four
Speaker 1: American fighter jets were scrambled from DC chased that plane,
Speaker 1: and the story was their explanation was we didn't get
Speaker 1: there in time and the plane was brought down instead
Speaker 1: by Todd Biemer and the other passengers. Famously, of those
Speaker 1: four fighter jets, of the pilots of those four fighter jets,
Speaker 1: they were National Guard pilots, two became generals. Wow, and
Speaker 1: one of them is Dan Kane.
Speaker 2: I did not know that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not widely known, but it's a fact. What
Speaker 1: are the odds of that?
Speaker 2: Not good? You heard that, right? General Dan Raisin Kane
Speaker 2: the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staph which makes
Speaker 2: him the highest military official in America. He was a
Speaker 2: pilot on nine to eleven that may or may not
Speaker 2: have taken down flight ninety three. WHOA, all right. I
Speaker 2: just wanted to bring that up because that was like
Speaker 2: the major revelation between the Tucker Carlson John Kiaku interview,
Speaker 2: and I was like, my tinfoil was tight, super tight
Speaker 2: after that one. But anyways, Temple did respond to me
Speaker 2: last night, and I am going to address it. So
Speaker 2: let's get that out of the way and then we'll
Speaker 2: move on to the meat of the news day.
Speaker 3: What irks me a lot about that is that most
Speaker 3: of what these people are saying it's mass formation psychosis.
Speaker 3: They're not talking about legitimate criticisms of Israel. Some people are,
Speaker 3: like Dave Smith is a really great example of somebody
Speaker 3: who has legitimate criticisms. I am not talking about him.
Speaker 3: I'll give you another example, because Clint Russell's welcome on
Speaker 3: the show, but he literally made a video called Israel
Speaker 3: Derangement Syndrome Debunked. And I can only say that I
Speaker 3: believe that Clint is I'll be nice, Clint, You're being untoward.
Speaker 2: So Tim goes on to misunderstand the entire point that
Speaker 2: I was making, but he opens by saying exactly what
Speaker 2: I was critiquing him for, which is that he believes
Speaker 2: that this is a mass formation psychosis that most people
Speaker 2: don't have genuine reasons to be upset with our relationship
Speaker 2: to Israel. The whole point of my episode a couple
Speaker 2: days ago was to say that Israel derangement syndrome, Well,
Speaker 2: it sure is a thing to a certain extent with
Speaker 2: a very small fraction of the people who talk about
Speaker 2: Israeli American relations. I don't believe by any stretch is
Speaker 2: it the majority. So needless to say, I didn't much
Speaker 2: appreciate that framing, but Tim is welcome to have his opinion.
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's sincerely held one. I think
Speaker 2: if anybody most of you have already seen the prior episode.
Speaker 2: If you haven't, please do go back and watch it.
Speaker 2: I thought I was very explicit and very clear, and
Speaker 2: I was not arguing that there are no people that
Speaker 2: aren't deranged. There obviously are. The point I was making, basically,
Speaker 2: the totality of the point the entire fifty minutes was
Speaker 2: that there are sincere disagreements and sincere issues, But you
Speaker 2: and Congressman Randy Fine a man with power, refused to
Speaker 2: address the sincere criticisms if there were any sincere ones
Speaker 2: that were brought up that you would agree with, it
Speaker 2: was just like, yeah, that's a problem, and then you
Speaker 2: just moved on. And then you went right into well
Speaker 2: this is LEONARDA. Joni was talking about how the opioid
Speaker 2: crisis in West Virginia is a product of Israel involvement
Speaker 2: or somehow, I don't know. All I was asking, imploring
Speaker 2: of you was to actually contend with the legitimate arguments
Speaker 2: to admit are legitimate. My point is is that I
Speaker 2: don't see you guys doing that. I see you bring
Speaker 2: them up periodically and go like, yeah, that's a fair point,
Speaker 2: and then move on. But you never actually deal with
Speaker 2: or contend with the argument that the totality of all
Speaker 2: of those negative things that you agree are valid criticisms.
Speaker 2: You don't then come to a conclusion of perhaps this
Speaker 2: relationship is to our detriment. You don't actually deal with
Speaker 2: that part of the discussion. That's what I'm asking for
Speaker 2: you to do, and you are unwilling for whatever reason.
Speaker 2: I'll be a nice Clint.
Speaker 3: You're being untoward because you know that my statement on
Speaker 3: what Israel. The arrangement syndrome is not you, And I
Speaker 3: literally said, my libertarian friends have legitimate arguments against Israel.
Speaker 3: What he then did was when I argue that there
Speaker 3: are people who think Israel is controlling the opiate drug
Speaker 3: trafficking trade in West Virginia, that's derangement. He then claims
Speaker 3: he's debunking Israel dearrangement by making normal arguments about Israel.
Speaker 3: He's doing that in my opinion, Clint. You're doing it,
Speaker 3: in my opinion, because it gets clicks. Because you're attacking
Speaker 3: me to the Israel de arrangement syndrome people because you
Speaker 3: want them to follow you. And I think that's stupid.
Speaker 3: But you're welcome to come on the show and then
Speaker 3: you'll be forced to agree with me because you know
Speaker 3: I'm right.
Speaker 2: And I've just got one other point to make about
Speaker 2: this before I move on. But the fact that he
Speaker 2: tries to spin this as me clickchasing er, that I'm
Speaker 2: attacking Tim to try and get the Israel derange people
Speaker 2: to follow me just isn't try true. I mean, if
Speaker 2: I were doing that, there are much click baitier means
Speaker 2: by which I could have put out that episode. I
Speaker 2: could have tried to bring up the fact that you
Speaker 2: met with Netan Yahoo, that you met under Tadam House rules,
Speaker 2: that your shift in dialogue about this issue seemed to
Speaker 2: correlate to a certain extent with that meeting. I did
Speaker 2: none of those things, because I personally don't believe, or
Speaker 2: at least I don't want to believe, that you are
Speaker 2: in the employ of baby Nen Yahoo, and I don't
Speaker 2: think that you are a lot of people do. But
Speaker 2: I didn't cast dispersions at your motives. I just said
Speaker 2: that I think that you are not viewing this in
Speaker 2: a fair way, and I tried to be as open
Speaker 2: to you evolving on this topic as humanly possible, because
Speaker 2: I think it's possible. I went on to say that
Speaker 2: I hope that you have tremendous success and that your
Speaker 2: show is the largest nightly news show. Would I have
Speaker 2: been doing any of that if I was just trying
Speaker 2: to get the Israel de Range people to follow me,
Speaker 2: given that that upsets those people tremendously. I could have
Speaker 2: played the clip where Ian Crosslin brings up the USS
Speaker 2: Liberty and you shoot it down, and it's like I
Speaker 2: wasn't doing any of that. My point is I could
Speaker 2: have played dirty. I didn't, so I would appreciate if
Speaker 2: you don't question my motives in levying these critiques against you,
Speaker 2: because I think they are valid. I think that they
Speaker 2: were fair, and I don't think that I presented them
Speaker 2: in a way that was unfair. So anyways, we'll move on.
Speaker 2: I did respond to him publicly on X and I
Speaker 2: said I'd be happy to do the show again. His
Speaker 2: bookers haven't reached out as of yet, but I'm willing,
Speaker 2: so we'll see what happens. I'm ONM with Julian Dory
Speaker 2: next week, so I'm traveling in New York City, but
Speaker 2: I will be available sometime and May, I'm sure.
Speaker 4: But all his original fans are turning on him. Have
Speaker 4: you seen that? I mean this week Joe Rogan and
Speaker 4: Tucker Carlson both renowned the leader as has done. Candice
Speaker 4: Owens did it, Alex Jones, all the people.
Speaker 2: I respect, how seriously you were laying this out? I do,
Speaker 2: I do, But just.
Speaker 5: Think about what it says about where we are, That
Speaker 5: we are in a place where we are looking at
Speaker 5: Candice Owns and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan as bellwethers
Speaker 5: of our political status. You know, like, wow, Rogan, what
Speaker 5: am I going to do now that he's not with Trump?
Speaker 5: It's like we are in mouth breather land in terms
Speaker 5: of how we formulate our positions.
Speaker 2: You gotta love the constant pivoting right before the election.
Speaker 2: It's like podcasters are evil, dangerous misinformation agents and that
Speaker 2: they need to be deplatformed. Then the election comes up
Speaker 2: and Trump goes on to Rogan and THEO and a
Speaker 2: bunch of big shows and the hit the entire cabinet,
Speaker 2: does you know Tim Dillon show and all sorts of
Speaker 2: big shows, right, and then they win pretty readily, and
Speaker 2: then everyone's like, we got to come up with our
Speaker 2: own Democrat version of Joe Rogan, even though Joe Rogan
Speaker 2: used to be a Democrat. And now Joe Rogan and
Speaker 2: Tucker and others turn against Trump because Trump has betrayed
Speaker 2: his base and not delivered on his promises. And then
Speaker 2: they go, look at these mouth breathing morons that oppose
Speaker 2: Donald Trump, the guy that we have dedicated our entire
Speaker 2: lives to opposing. How dare they right? But even weirder,
Speaker 2: you have a guy like Chris Cuomo, a man who's
Speaker 2: famous for I don't know, being the brother of famous
Speaker 2: people and being a laughing stock on CNN for fifteen
Speaker 2: years or whatever, and getting his teeth kicked in viciously
Speaker 2: by Dave Smith on PbD a couple of years ago.
Speaker 2: I was there in the studio watch it happen live.
Speaker 2: You got owned by a stand up comic, a guy
Speaker 2: that you repeatedly referred to as a mouth breathing moron
Speaker 2: or whatever. But you can't beat him in a debate
Speaker 2: about the most important topic of that year, to which
Speaker 2: I say, perhaps you should come off your high horse.
Speaker 2: Perhaps you should appreciate that some right leaning or independent
Speaker 2: commentators are actually willing to tell the truth about Trump
Speaker 2: and to speak out against things that they think are
Speaker 2: morally reprehensible or politically unsound. But no, instead you would
Speaker 2: prefer to dunk on them. And here's the sad reality.
Speaker 2: The reason that they can't agree with Canis or Tucker
Speaker 2: or Rogan or Alex is because they oppose Trump for
Speaker 2: his war in Iran, which the Democrats, at least the
Speaker 2: big d mainstream corporate media hack Democrats. They all love
Speaker 2: the war in Iran, and they all want to prioritize Israel.
Speaker 2: They still look at them as being crackpots. How could
Speaker 2: they oppose something that Trump is doing that we support?
Speaker 2: And at the end of the day, isn't that exactly
Speaker 2: what the uniparty is having big corporate hacks left and
Speaker 2: right pretending to give you different opinions. But when it
Speaker 2: comes to the things that matter, like our greatest ally,
Speaker 2: like the warfare welfare state, all of a sudden they
Speaker 2: all in tandem unify and oppose dissident speakers like Brogan
Speaker 2: or Tucker. But Tim Dillon ain't haven't none of that.
Speaker 6: It was better after nine to eleven. You had more
Speaker 6: fun in this country after nine to eleven than you
Speaker 6: are having right now. It's true, you had more fun
Speaker 6: after nine to eleven than you are having right now.
Speaker 2: Right now is one of.
Speaker 6: The bleakest periods that I've ever lived through, and it's
Speaker 6: the most technologically advanced time that we have. The things
Speaker 6: that you can do technologically now are beyond anything that
Speaker 6: has ever been done in history. But in order to enjoy,
Speaker 6: you have to be a sociopath. You have to be
Speaker 6: unbothered by seeing a two year old that Israel lit
Speaker 6: on fire running around, and you have to swipe without
Speaker 6: thinking about it. And go right to door dash and
Speaker 6: order typhood, you have to be a sociopath.
Speaker 2: So to me, what makes Tim Dillon so special is
Speaker 2: that he manages to distill the insanity and the really
Speaker 2: the sadness about modern life into a palatable, humorous breakdown
Speaker 2: that we can all kind of take a step back
Speaker 2: from the misery of it all and laugh at and
Speaker 2: laugh about. And as grim as his prognostication or his
Speaker 2: diagnosis is, I think he's right. I think that despite
Speaker 2: the fact that we have a really incredible advancement of
Speaker 2: technology that has improved our lives in countless ways, the
Speaker 2: double edged sword that comes with technology has also obviously
Speaker 2: created a major detriment to humanity. It's very hard. If
Speaker 2: you're young, you may not agree with me, but if
Speaker 2: you're old like me or older, you probably do remember
Speaker 2: what life was like pre nine to eleven, and it's
Speaker 2: it's hard to say that it's better. It is. And
Speaker 2: to be clear, I've become more wealthy and successful, and
Speaker 2: I've dated all the women that I wanted a date,
Speaker 2: and I've done all these things that I checked off
Speaker 2: the list of achievements that I wanted. And yet I
Speaker 2: think that I would still prefer America pre nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: That's just the truth.
Speaker 6: No one believes life is better now than it was
Speaker 6: in twenty ten. We're in twenty twenty six. Look at
Speaker 6: twenty ten. Social media hasn't programmed our minds. We can
Speaker 6: still watch a movie, we can still read a book.
Speaker 6: We still have an attention span. People can still go
Speaker 6: on a date and talk to a woman. They don't
Speaker 6: have to goon for eight hours in their room and
Speaker 6: then read about Hitler. Nobody prefers living in a cold
Speaker 6: white apartment in Miami and snorting adderall going to the
Speaker 6: club every night. No one thinks that's a preferable life
Speaker 6: to living in a brick Tudor style house with a
Speaker 6: dog and a family and a Christmas tree lighting.
Speaker 2: No one thinks.
Speaker 6: That's a better life than the Gilmour girl's life. If
Speaker 6: we keep going away, we're going No one is gonna
Speaker 6: say twenty thirty six is superior to twenty twenty six,
Speaker 6: even though at that point you could probably talk to
Speaker 6: your dead mother. You probably talk to an AI version
Speaker 6: of your dead son. Jimmy, is that you?
Speaker 2: And that's the grim prognosis part that he gets to
Speaker 2: that as rough as things are now. He thinks ten
Speaker 2: years from now, twenty thirty six, we're gonna look back
Speaker 2: on twenty twenty six as the good old days. And
Speaker 2: he probably is right. And this is a topic I
Speaker 2: don't often cover, but I gotta take a minute and
Speaker 2: just talk about the clavicular looks, maxing, mogging kind of
Speaker 2: alpha man thing that's happening right now. And again, for
Speaker 2: those that are young, you're probably not familiar with the
Speaker 2: prior iterations of this movement, but this was a big
Speaker 2: thing back in eight o nine ten there was The
Speaker 2: Game was this book that got put out and it
Speaker 2: was all about how to social proof and put yourself
Speaker 2: out there and improve yourself and date and get women
Speaker 2: and blah blah blah. So this is not a new thing.
Speaker 2: What concerns me about it is it's now implementing classic
Speaker 2: surgery and facial abuse and self harm and drug use,
Speaker 2: massive amounts of drug use. And the same problem that
Speaker 2: came along with the prior iteration of the Game era
Speaker 2: is that this era is even more depraved, and it
Speaker 2: also lacks the moral underpinning or some sort of philosophy
Speaker 2: by which you actually are justified in pursuing these endeavors.
Speaker 2: I believe that it is noble and good to self improve.
Speaker 2: I think it's totally fine to want to be healthy
Speaker 2: or to look more attractive, to attract a mate that
Speaker 2: you would find appealing, to increase your financial status, your wealth,
Speaker 2: your entrepreneurial endeavors by which you might meet that mate
Speaker 2: and create a family and have kids, and seek actual
Speaker 2: familial network that perpetuates your lineage, that actually improves the world,
Speaker 2: that improves your life, that makes you happy. That tragically
Speaker 2: does not seem to be the end goal of any
Speaker 2: of this. This is just about how many women you
Speaker 2: can get and how how many you can have at
Speaker 2: the same time. The top spokesman for it, mister Clavicular,
Speaker 2: has apparently essentially castrated himself by taking drugs. I don't
Speaker 2: know if it was hormonal therapy or if it was steroids,
Speaker 2: but regardless, there's reports that he cannot have, he cannot reproduce,
Speaker 2: he can't have kids. He's essentially sterile. And let me
Speaker 2: tell you, as an old player, to the young players
Speaker 2: out there, if you're doing this not to have a family.
Speaker 2: If you're doing this not to have kids or to
Speaker 2: get married or meet a beautiful, loving wife, You are
Speaker 2: doing this for the wrong reasons. If you are doing
Speaker 2: this to fill a spiritual void or a lack of
Speaker 2: self confidence, or to brag to your friends, to feel
Speaker 2: better about yourself in the day to day rat race
Speaker 2: that is modern life, you are failing.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to dissuade you from pursuing this entirely.
Speaker 2: I think that it actually could be to your benefit,
Speaker 2: especially if you hit the gym. That helps with brain chemistry,
Speaker 2: it helps with endorphins, It'll actually improve your outlook, it'll
Speaker 2: help with entrepreneurial endeavors or in your career path. Those
Speaker 2: are all good things, Those are all productive things. If
Speaker 2: you start hammering your face and putting as many drugs
Speaker 2: in your body as humanly possible to look as good
Speaker 2: as possible, as young as possible, well, totally dismissing the
Speaker 2: long term health risks that might come along with that,
Speaker 2: well then I think you are committing a grave sin
Speaker 2: against yourself, your family, and your progeny. And I hope
Speaker 2: you'll stop. But the sad reality of all this is
Speaker 2: that there's nothing inherent, there's nothing natural about the consistent
Speaker 2: degradation of our standard of living or our outlook about life.
Speaker 2: It doesn't have to be this way. The trajectory does
Speaker 2: not have to continue to stay downward as it has
Speaker 2: been for the past couple decades. And there are many
Speaker 2: reasons that this has come to pass, and there are
Speaker 2: many people that deserve blame. You could blame it on
Speaker 2: the woke movement that came from the left. You can
Speaker 2: blame it on the printing press which degraded our standard
Speaker 2: of living exponentially. You can blame it on the Republicans
Speaker 2: who promised fiscal sanity and then delivered nothing. You can
Speaker 2: blame it on Trump for promising to remedy much of
Speaker 2: this and then completely abandoning those promises. You can blame
Speaker 2: it on the Internet. You can blame it on the men,
Speaker 2: the young boys out there who are going down this
Speaker 2: path if you want to. You can blame it on
Speaker 2: the young women out there who have obviously been indoctrinated
Speaker 2: into things that are also and equally unhealthy for their
Speaker 2: own wellbeing and happiness moving forward. And while diagnosing the
Speaker 2: issue is obviously very important when you want to fix something,
Speaker 2: it's also equally important not to expend all of your
Speaker 2: energy on that diagnosis when you actually need to start
Speaker 2: to fix things when you actually have to make progress,
Speaker 2: when you actually have to help these young men and women,
Speaker 2: And I would just encourage you guys down instead of
Speaker 2: a path of social media, instead of a path of
Speaker 2: hammering your facial bones so that you have a slightly
Speaker 2: enhanced jaw line. You might want to pick up a Bible.
Speaker 2: You might want to actually hit the gym and do
Speaker 2: it for holistic reasons. You might want to meditate or
Speaker 2: do yoga to try and improve your connection your mind, body,
Speaker 2: spirit connection. You might want to disconnect from the Internet
Speaker 2: and stop trying to get all of your self worth
Speaker 2: through it. You might want to actually meet people in
Speaker 2: person and hug someone or shake someone's hand, have a beer,
Speaker 2: create a community, become more intelligent, more interesting, more charismatic,
Speaker 2: more humorous, more worthy of that mate that you so desire,
Speaker 2: because I believe that the truth that lies within all
Speaker 2: of the influencer class in this arena is that you
Speaker 2: get the mate and the life that you deserve, that
Speaker 2: you've worked for, that you've earned. So instead of looking
Speaker 2: for institutions or people to blame, I'd say look in
Speaker 2: the mirror, and not for narcissistic reasons, not to decide
Speaker 2: on which of your facial bones needs to be enhanced further,
Speaker 2: but instead to reevaluate what you are actually doing with
Speaker 2: your life. Are you achieving to the level that you
Speaker 2: are capable of? Are you trying to the level that
Speaker 2: you are capable of? And I would argue that most,
Speaker 2: if not all, of us the answer is now, including myself.
Speaker 2: And sorry for the impromptu pep talk, but I want
Speaker 2: young men out there to be striving and pursuing things
Speaker 2: that will actually bring them long term happiness and joy,
Speaker 2: because I believe that you deserve that, that you were
Speaker 2: worthy of that, but you got to put in the effort.
Speaker 2: And while we're talking about the young influencer class, let's
Speaker 2: briefly discuss this discussion that Nick Foint has had with
Speaker 2: Keith Woods. It's going to be so cocked if the
Speaker 2: Democrats get back in, presumably really will be.
Speaker 7: That's why I want a Republican to win. I don't
Speaker 7: want it to be Vance or Rubio, but a Republican
Speaker 7: has to win because you know what a lot of
Speaker 7: these israel Critical counter Semitic influencers do not realize is
Speaker 7: that the Left wants to kill us, like they literally
Speaker 7: want us dead. And they will work to effectuate that.
Speaker 7: They want to silence us, they want us debang deplatformed,
Speaker 7: and ultimately they would prefer if we all just died.
Speaker 7: So you know, it's times like this they'll remind you
Speaker 7: if the left had it their way, they would destroy
Speaker 7: the right wing.
Speaker 2: Well, I think Nick has some valid critiques there. I
Speaker 2: find it fascinating that this guy, just a year ago
Speaker 2: was arguing that he wanted Donald Trump to lose, and
Speaker 2: now he's saying, I want the GOP to win twenty eight.
Speaker 2: I just don't want it to be Rubio or Vince
Speaker 2: and I would just fire back with like, okay, I
Speaker 2: agree with you. I'd rather none of those guys win either.
Speaker 2: But at the same time, who in the GOP were
Speaker 2: presents someone that is an actual figure that you would back,
Speaker 2: that you would want to see prevail, because as you know,
Speaker 2: ninety percent of them are on at apack payroll. Anyways,
Speaker 2: So who is it. I've given you my answer. I'd
Speaker 2: like to see Thomas Massey. I just find it strange
Speaker 2: that you're talking about how the left wants us dead
Speaker 2: and if the Democrats win in twenty eight that I
Speaker 2: guess that's going to come to pass, but you wanted
Speaker 2: Donald Trump to lose, which meant that Kamala Harris would
Speaker 2: have won, would not have done that. I don't I
Speaker 2: really don't understand. At least what I thought Nick was
Speaker 2: saying was that when we're betrayed, or when you know
Speaker 2: you're about to be betrayed, which is kotos to him.
Speaker 2: He analyzed Trump correctly on that that you have to
Speaker 2: punish them, that they have to lose power, no matter
Speaker 2: the consequences, burn it all down. He's said this how
Speaker 2: many times over the past six months as he said that,
Speaker 2: and now suddenly, no, let's not burn it all down.
Speaker 2: Let's make sure that the GOP wins in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 2: I'm like, interesting, So let's recap why I'm so and
Speaker 2: still convinced that the GOP does need to lose.
Speaker 8: So I can't take this. You can't take this whole
Speaker 8: pedophile stuff anymore. I am just as upset about Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 8: and I wonder why our government doesn't do things that
Speaker 8: other governments are doing. But this is all political and
Speaker 8: it's being used and it is becoming extraordinarily dangerous.
Speaker 2: You know what.
Speaker 8: Don't listen to anybody on the left that talks to
Speaker 8: you anything about Jeffrey Epstein, if they support the open
Speaker 8: borders and the Islamists that are here in America are
Speaker 8: trying to tell you all about Palestine and everything else.
Speaker 2: Don't listen to them. Don't listen to them. Do you
Speaker 2: care about getting justice for the Epstein victims but also
Speaker 2: the children of Gaza? Do you concern yourself with Ghislaine Maxwell,
Speaker 2: but also think that blowing up one hundred and seventy
Speaker 2: Iranian schoolgirls is probably not a great thing to do, Well,
Speaker 2: then you're not able to be listened to. According to
Speaker 2: Glenn Beeck, that you should not be listened to because
Speaker 2: you care about those two things so well. I agree
Speaker 2: with one. Does that I would like to see the
Speaker 2: GOP one in twenty eight if it is a Thomas
Speaker 2: Massey candidacy. I am also equally convinced that if it
Speaker 2: is a Glenn Beck supported candidate, a La Vance Rubio,
Speaker 2: or somebody else that is equally swamp monsterish or worse,
Speaker 2: that I don't want to see them prevail, and that
Speaker 2: they need to pay a price for these betrayal. As
Speaker 2: you know, there was an alled shooting at the White
Speaker 2: House correspondence dinner a couple days ago. Let's break this down.
Speaker 1: This is really, really weird.
Speaker 2: This speech tonight will be classic Donald J.
Speaker 9: Trump.
Speaker 2: It'll be funny, it'll be entertaining. There will be some
Speaker 2: shots fired.
Speaker 5: Tonight on the road.
Speaker 2: Check this out quickly.
Speaker 10: Tell you.
Speaker 3: I was sitting next to Caroline Lovett, the Press Secretary's husband.
Speaker 2: He was seated right next to me, and then he.
Speaker 11: Kind of leaned over and said, you know, I watched
Speaker 11: you on TV DoD a great job.
Speaker 3: You need to be very safe.
Speaker 10: And he was very serious when he said that to me,
Speaker 10: and he kind of looked around the room and he said,
Speaker 10: you know, there are some.
Speaker 2: They cut her phone off. Now there's rabbit hole goes
Speaker 2: a lot deeper than that. And I am actually not
Speaker 2: a full blown truther on this issue. I think it's
Speaker 2: a distinct possibility that some random nutter grabbed a gun
Speaker 2: and sprinted in there and got at a bunch of
Speaker 2: Secret Service agents and they fired back and somehow nobody
Speaker 2: got hit and he is still alive. I guess it's possible.
Speaker 2: It is very weird, particularly that the shooter survived it.
Speaker 2: That is shocking to me, But as is often the
Speaker 2: case with these things, I feel as if we're being
Speaker 2: distracted by a discussion or a debate over whether or
Speaker 2: not that even happened, and instead not paying attention to
Speaker 2: what they're using that event to try and bring about.
Speaker 2: There's an incredible video by this girl named the Dre
Speaker 2: Dossier that broke this all down in a way that
Speaker 2: I was blown away by.
Speaker 12: And that's when I saw that their units come pre
Speaker 12: installed with Faraday caging. That's right, electromagnetic shielding, the kind
Speaker 12: of thing you would need for skiffs. Remember skiffs. I
Speaker 12: told you to remember skiffs because think back to underground
Speaker 12: facilities in Jerusalem. I mean, their own documentation shows that
Speaker 12: they use modular construction techniques for their own rapid deployment
Speaker 12: of internal infrastructure, prefabricated rooms that could be assembled quickly underground,
Speaker 12: and I'm seeing names like Caterpillar, and Caterpillar also makes
Speaker 12: industrial generators, the Catch three, five, one six B models
Speaker 12: that provide over one hundred megawatts of backup power. Union
Speaker 12: Pacific is also an interesting donor in that light, because yes,
Speaker 12: they're a railroad company, but what many people don't know
Speaker 12: is they also own fourteen hundred miles of classified fiber
Speaker 12: optic cables that run along the railway, and it's those
Speaker 12: fiber optic networks that the Department of Defense have as
Speaker 12: their secure telecommunications backbone, and it's because they're air gapped
Speaker 12: from the public Internet. And then you've got Microsoft and Amazon, Google,
Speaker 12: Pallanteer like every major cloud computing and AI infrastructure company
Speaker 12: in America that matters. You've got booz Allen Hamilton, who
Speaker 12: builds classified networks for the CIA, and NSA Blackstone installing
Speaker 12: over two hundred megawatts of backup power.
Speaker 2: So this random investigative journalist has broken down based off
Speaker 2: of looking at all of the contracts, many of them
Speaker 2: which are protected, and essentially sussing out what's happening here,
Speaker 2: and she comes to the conclusion that the ballroom is
Speaker 2: not about the ballroom, but in fact, it is a
Speaker 2: lid to a bunker, a bunker in which you will
Speaker 2: have either talenteer or intelligence community kind of surveillance. Tech
Speaker 2: Plus database is basically an entire AI mainframe brain. But
Speaker 2: in the hours after the attack, the third attack that
Speaker 2: we're privy to on Donald Trump's life, allegedly we have
Speaker 2: a influencer brigade, we have a flood what would you
Speaker 2: think that people would be talking about in the aftermath
Speaker 2: of an attempt on the president's life. Perhaps it would
Speaker 2: be Secret Service pitfalls, Perhaps it would be security concerns,
Speaker 2: Perhaps it would be I don't know, rhetoric about the left,
Speaker 2: you know, normal things that people talk about in the
Speaker 2: aftermath of an attack on Donald Trump. No, it's just
Speaker 2: a full court press from some of the most likely paid,
Speaker 2: just say, likely influencers when it comes to the right wing.
Speaker 2: And what are they pushing We need a ballroom now.
Speaker 2: Their justification for that is because then Donald Trump could
Speaker 2: hold these events at the White House and not have
Speaker 2: to go off site. And I guess the security that
Speaker 2: was just a few miles away would be preferable at home.
Speaker 2: But that doesn't explain why all of them, basically in Unison,
Speaker 2: started to push this same concept that this ballroom absolutely
Speaker 2: must be built. They even got my guy, Senator Rand Paul,
Speaker 2: who's pushing the bill to have it completely privately funded,
Speaker 2: to which I responded to Rand just a few hours
Speaker 2: ago saying, look, I appreciate that you're trying to get
Speaker 2: it privately funded. I would rather there be no taxes
Speaker 2: and that everything be privately funded. So you got me
Speaker 2: on your side with that one nice trick. However, here's
Speaker 2: the question. Do you want this ballroom and whatever the
Speaker 2: hell you're building underneath it to be privately funded because
Speaker 2: you want to save the taxpayer money? Or could it
Speaker 2: be that it's because you're doing a bunch of shit
Speaker 2: that congressional oversight may not permit. So if it's privately funded,
Speaker 2: kind of circumvince the whole necessity of congressional oversight. Now
Speaker 2: done it. Here's how Lindsay Graham described it.
Speaker 13: We're going to introduce legislation that would authorize four hundred
Speaker 13: million dollars to be spent to secure the to build
Speaker 13: the presidential ballroom.
Speaker 8: Underneath.
Speaker 13: There will be a lot of military stuff. There will
Speaker 13: be a Secret Service annex. Underneath this ballroom will be
Speaker 13: infrastructure that is national security centric. The ballroom itself will
Speaker 13: avoid the dilemma of having to lead the White House
Speaker 13: grounds with future presidents in this presidence to go downtown
Speaker 13: and in place this less secure.
Speaker 2: And is often the case with Lindsay Graham. He let
Speaker 2: the truth slip because he says, it's not so much
Speaker 2: the ballroom that is national security interests, it's what's underneath it. Now,
Speaker 2: if you were just arguing that for the sake of
Speaker 2: protecting both this president and all future presididence, that you
Speaker 2: need to have this ballroom on the White House ground
Speaker 2: so that they never have to travel off site, and
Speaker 2: that's the national security interest, that would be one thing.
Speaker 2: But that's not what he said. He said that underneath
Speaker 2: it will be the national security interest. What the fuck
Speaker 2: are you putting underneath it?
Speaker 11: Lindsay Raillan's tool that expires this coming week. It obviously
Speaker 11: allows the FBI to surveil potential terrorists who are overseas.
Speaker 11: Do you think about the importance of having these tools
Speaker 11: to protect our country from these kinds of threats? And
Speaker 11: how will you get that message to Congress when there's
Speaker 11: a Congress right now that's skeptical about renewing those powers.
Speaker 14: Well, Jackie, I know both sides of it because PISO
Speaker 14: was used against me and very very viciously by a
Speaker 14: dirty cop. You know, we had to call me gang.
Speaker 14: It was used against me, and they used it very illegally.
Speaker 14: I mean, they signed corridor that were illegal. That's the
Speaker 14: bad news. The good news is that the military really
Speaker 14: needs it, and it's really needed for national security.
Speaker 2: So in the aftermath of this attack on Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: not only are they pushing for some sort of bunker ballroom,
Speaker 2: but they are also pushing for a reauthorization, a reupping
Speaker 2: of FAISA, which Donald Trump is very explicit in that
Speaker 2: it was used to illegally spy on him and hundreds
Speaker 2: of thousands of times against Americans. However, I guess we
Speaker 2: need that. But they didn't stop there. They didn't just
Speaker 2: condemn leftist violent rhetoric. They started to push for what
Speaker 2: seems to be a real censorship push.
Speaker 11: Is disinformation and misinformation online.
Speaker 10: There will be by size clips that will go viral
Speaker 10: to the point where there are Americans in this country
Speaker 10: that believe that what happens Saturday night was staged. How
Speaker 10: does this White House tackle that with social media companies
Speaker 10: out there or whether it's ex Facebook, Instagram, how do
Speaker 10: they work with these companies to make sure that doesn't
Speaker 10: get out of control?
Speaker 15: It's certainly a good question, Aisha. I don't have tangible
Speaker 15: answers for you on what we're doing with social media companies,
Speaker 15: if anything at all. What I will say is it's
Speaker 15: very important to us that we get the truth and
Speaker 15: the facts about this case, in any case out there
Speaker 15: as quickly as possible to dispel some of that crazy
Speaker 15: nonsense that you do see running rampant online.
Speaker 2: I yes, dangerous misinformation. Well, blast from the past, COVID era, right,
Speaker 2: I cut my teeth or I had to duck and
Speaker 2: dodge to stay alive for many, many years, like many
Speaker 2: of you did.
Speaker 16: Many people in this room, if we're going to be
Speaker 16: honest about it, have done it, has done as well.
Speaker 2: They're just as guilty as a lot of people on X.
Speaker 16: When you have reporters, when you have media just being
Speaker 16: overly critical and calling the president horrible names for no
Speaker 16: reason and without evidence, without proof, it shouldn't surprise us
Speaker 16: that this type of rhetoric takes place.
Speaker 2: That's acting ag Todd Blanche, the replacement for Pam Bondi, who,
Speaker 2: by the way, brought charges today against former FBI head Comy. Now,
Speaker 2: did he bring charges because of the BS Russian collusion
Speaker 2: Steele dossier, Hillary Clinton backed investigation that they launched that
Speaker 2: wasted ten years of our lives and destroyed this country
Speaker 2: by making us think that we were ruled over by
Speaker 2: a Russian plant. No, No, he's bringing charges against James
Speaker 2: Comy because He posted a photo on Instagram saying eighty
Speaker 2: six forty seven. Oh wow, I think he's definitely going
Speaker 2: to prison now, I think we got him. And while
Speaker 2: neither of them called for overt censorship, but definitely we're
Speaker 2: laying the groundwork right. You can see it starting to
Speaker 2: take hold. Leave it to Mark Levin, the great one
Speaker 2: over on Fox News to lay it out for.
Speaker 9: You first time things like this have happened. But it
Speaker 9: really is problematic because so much.
Speaker 2: Of it is protected.
Speaker 9: And you hood people say, don't you believe in the
Speaker 9: First Amendment? They don't really know the First Amendment. Do
Speaker 9: you want to deplatform people? You know, the Libs do that.
Speaker 9: I don't have any problem with deplatforming Nazis or jihades.
Speaker 9: I don't have any problem with deplatforming them. We do
Speaker 9: limit speech. We limit speech, pornography, we limit speech, cigarettes
Speaker 9: on the air, and so we limit speech, booze, limit speech, drugs,
Speaker 9: and I can go on and on, and I'm talking
Speaker 9: about the kind of speech that really gets in the
Speaker 9: head of people who want to do grave damage to
Speaker 9: other people, incitement, and I'm not talking about it in
Speaker 9: an ambiguous way. When you get a guy that says Yeah,
Speaker 9: I don't know if there was really rape, can you
Speaker 9: prove it? And so for on October seventh, Well, he's
Speaker 9: allowed to say that. But in the pattern of what
Speaker 9: this person is saying, what is it that they're trying
Speaker 9: to do? Do you think the founders would have.
Speaker 2: Put up with this? Well, the truth again slips out.
Speaker 2: What did he say was incitement someone who questions whether
Speaker 2: or not there was pervasive rape on October seventh? That
Speaker 2: is incitement to violence because you question war propaganda. Oops,
Speaker 2: now I see where this is headed. Now, rest assured.
Speaker 2: Mark Levin isn't talking about censoring red, white, and blue
Speaker 2: patriotic Americans. He's just talking about censoring and deplatforming Nazis,
Speaker 2: which I'm sure we can all get on board with. Right. Well,
Speaker 2: Josie broke this down. These are all the people that
Speaker 2: Mark Levin has called a Nazi over the past couple months.
Speaker 2: The Democrats, the Democrat media, an Australian bakery, the Pakistani
Speaker 2: Defense Minister, Scott Horton, the entire Libertarian Party, the college students,
Speaker 2: the Ayatola, Jake Shields, Nick Kentes, Putin's buddies, Dan Bilzerian,
Speaker 2: the Houthis, Dave Smith, Tucker Cross in Beirut, Hesbula, a
Speaker 2: veteran who has to mark to be more tolerant, Myron Gains,
Speaker 2: the City of London, Hamas Thomas Friedom and the terrorists,
Speaker 2: the woke right, Grant Plantner, the United Nations, Harvard Amsterdam,
Speaker 2: Columbia University, students, the New York Times. They're running a
Speaker 2: Nazi regime, the Islamic Nazi regime, the Islamo Nazi regime,
Speaker 2: the Islamis Nazi regime all over on New Nazis a
Speaker 2: protester on a subway, Rashida Talib, Abraham Rassi, New York
Speaker 2: Times correspondent, Joe Biden's entire state department, the president of
Speaker 2: Turkey College basketball analyst Bruce Pearl, certain Arab liberal and journalists,
Speaker 2: anyone who associates with Dave Smith Hey, that's me, Reporter
Speaker 2: Lulu Garcia and Navarro Isis, and seventeen random dudes on Thanks.
Speaker 7: So.
Speaker 2: While I actually agree that occasionally the rhetoric in America
Speaker 2: has gotten to the point of being so toxic it
Speaker 2: could present dangerous circumstances, I also believe that as an
Speaker 2: American we get to say whatever the fuck we want
Speaker 2: because hear me out mark this is America, because to
Speaker 2: sacrifice our liberty to ensure our safety would ensure us
Speaker 2: of neither. Because to let the government dictate what is
Speaker 2: hateful and insightful speech is a perilous path to go
Speaker 2: down because you represent and obviously owe your allegiance to
Speaker 2: a country that is not America. And I don't feel
Speaker 2: comfortable having people like you dictate what I can say, ever,
Speaker 2: because no one should have that power, because two hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty years ago, we broke away from an empire
Speaker 2: who said that they had that power to prevent what
Speaker 2: we could talk about, and the answer to that was
Speaker 2: and me my musket. So while they'll use this alleged
Speaker 2: attack on Donald Trump, which I think there's a decent
Speaker 2: chance really happened and it was totally legit, threat and
Speaker 2: risk and all that, and they're going to now try
Speaker 2: and utilize it to push through a ballroom which appears
Speaker 2: to be the central mainframe brain for our AI overlord
Speaker 2: technocratic dystopian cage. And they also are now pushing censorship
Speaker 2: against people like you and I because their propaganda isn't
Speaker 2: working anymore because we've seen through it too many times.
Speaker 2: You've tried the same tricks, and we've caught on. They
Speaker 2: are currently indicting the former head of the FBI, which
Speaker 2: abused the PISIS system to frame the sitting president of
Speaker 2: the United States for treason, while that very victim of
Speaker 2: that spying is pushing for a FISA reauthorization so that
Speaker 2: they can do it to you. So, while Andrew Wilson
Speaker 2: and Timpoole to a certain extent, and so many others
Speaker 2: would like for us to trust the Trump administration and
Speaker 2: give them a chance, I would encourage you to stay
Speaker 2: on guard, to recognize that this is not in your
Speaker 2: defense or in your best interest, but rather in the
Speaker 2: defense of the establishment and the powers that be, which
Speaker 2: we thought maybe Trump would be attacking. But it seems
Speaker 2: as if it's really just a repackaging of the same
Speaker 2: oppression that we have faced for decades now. So while
Speaker 2: I hope the indictment against Comy sticks, and I hope
Speaker 2: that these charges that you're bringing against the SPOC stick,
Speaker 2: and while I hope that the indictments that you're bringing
Speaker 2: against the Somali fraudsters in Minneapolis stick. Until they do,
Speaker 2: don't expect me to applaud because I feel as if
Speaker 2: this is bred and circuses for the peons. I will
Speaker 2: clap tepidly for you bringing the indictments at all, but
Speaker 2: don't expect me to exactly celebrate until I see handcuffs
Speaker 2: and lengthy prison sentences for all of these people, and
Speaker 2: then we can start to talk about ending the war
Speaker 2: in Iran. And then and only then can we start
Speaker 2: to talk about the midterms or twenty twenty eight, or
Speaker 2: me considering voting for any people you have to deliver,
Speaker 2: and then we'll talk until then. Got the fuck up?
Speaker 2: If you enjoyed this episode, hit the damn hype hype this,
Speaker 2: You guys hype the hell out of the last one,
Speaker 2: So thank you to helping it get like, I don't know,
Speaker 2: twice the normal views. So I appreciate you, guys. Shout
Speaker 2: out to Dave Smith for the shout out too. I
Speaker 2: appreciate that.
Speaker 17: There was a bunch of stuff that I wanted to
Speaker 17: talk about, and then one of them was Randy Fine
Speaker 17: going on Tim Poole Show. And then I saw our
Speaker 17: our buddy Clint Russell did a show on that the
Speaker 17: other day, and that was just it was perfect.
Speaker 2: I just thought it was great.
Speaker 17: I clinted the man if you guys don't watch his shows,
Speaker 17: one of the best shows out there.
Speaker 2: Still.
Speaker 17: I always say Clint's criminally underrated. I've just been saying
Speaker 17: that for years, but then he really blew up, So
Speaker 17: I don't know if I can keep saying he's still underrated.
Speaker 17: He deserves more than is just excellent show. Liberty Lockdown
Speaker 17: one of the best podcasts out there.
Speaker 2: Dave has been nothing but supportive of me throughout the career,
Speaker 2: if you want to call it that, and I could
Speaker 2: not appreciate it more. I got into this inspired almost
Speaker 2: entirely because of him. So the fact that he and
Speaker 2: I have become such good friends and he is such
Speaker 2: a huge booster of my work is just consistent reinforcement
Speaker 2: that I'm on the right path, that I'm doing the
Speaker 2: right thing. And thanks to all of you for actually
Speaker 2: making me feel as if my time is not wasted,
Speaker 2: that I actually reach enough people to feel as if, well,
Speaker 2: I may not be changing the world, at least I'm
Speaker 2: making a small, small difference and that means a lot
Speaker 2: to me. Please do it the like button subscribe. I'm
Speaker 2: almost I think I'm five thousand away from three hundred
Speaker 2: k on x If you want to subscribe on x
Speaker 2: at Liberty Lockpot. I'll follow you back. That's five bucks
Speaker 2: a month. Or you can subscribe here. I am twelve
Speaker 2: thousan away from one hundred k, which means I get
Speaker 2: the little silver plaque that I get to put back there.
Speaker 2: See that little white spot. I want to have the
Speaker 2: little silver plaque there, little platinum. Come on, baby, let's go.
Speaker 2: How'd your k We're so close? Or you can go
Speaker 2: to my pullo dot com and get you some cozy
Speaker 2: like Mike Lindelli. Just use promo code Lockdown. Love you guys,
Speaker 2: leave a comments down below if I got anything wrong,
Speaker 2: and we'll see you in a couple days. Please subscribe
Speaker 2: to Liberty Lockdown. Great podcast. Clint is Tight