Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
Hope that everybody had a great weekend out there, and
hopefully you've hit the ground running on this fantastic Monday morning.
We enter the third week of the Gallain Maxwell trial,
with the prosecution resting its case last Friday on the
back of some really powerful testimony given by Annie Farmer. Now,
we heard from four accusers overall during the first two weeks,
and the testimony given by those accusers has been very,
very powerful and very strong in my opinion, And when
you look at what they had to say, the stories
that they told, and you look at the charges that
have been brought against Maxwell, it's very obvious that these
testimonies are supporting the accusations that have been made. Now,
is it going to be enough to convince the jury?
I would hope so. I would think so, But we'll
have to see this week what the defense plans on doing. Now,
there was a point in time when there was discussion
that the defense wasn't even going to call any witnesses whatsoever,
and now it's looking like they plan on calling thirty
five defense witnesses. So Maxwell's defense gets under way starting Thursday,
and according to her lawyers, they expect thirty five witnesses,
So Thursday, Friday, both of those days, you could almost
guarantee that there's going to be witnesses on the stand.
But I would think that it's going to bleed into
the next week as well, considering we're talking about thirty
five people that have to come up and give their testimony.
So it's going to be pretty interesting to see how
quickly these witnesses are moved through as far as the
defense goes. Now, it could end up being a drawn
out process, right Who knows how long it's going to
take for each one of these witnesses on the stand.
And in fact, we don't even know who these witnesses are,
so it's going to be interesting to see who they
trot out to try and drum up some support for
Gallne Maxwell's side of the story. And honestly, I don't
know who the hell is going to come out as
a character witness for Gallane Maxwell. But there are reports
that several people are going to give testimony but anonymously
in fear that their lives would be ruined for supporting
Galanne Maxwell. So that's what's on the agenda. As far
as the defense and what they're going to cook up,
as far as with these witnesses, well, that's anyone's guess. Now,
one thing we have learned from the defense so far
is that they are not afraid to stray into scumbag waters. Now.
I get it, it's their job right. They got to
do whatever they possibly can to try and get their
scumbag client off. I understand that's how it works. I
also understand that it's scumbaggery. I also understand that it's gross.
Now that being said, it's up to the prosecution to
stamp that shit out. It's up to the prosecution to
make sure that they point out that it's scumbaggery, that
it's gross, and then it's up for the jury to
decide what they think. Now, so far, the defense of Maxwell,
they haven't brought any receipts to the table. All they've
hinged their whole entire bet on the fact that they
can destroy the credibility of these accusers. And while they've
done the best job that they can to destroy the
credibility of these accusers, I keep referring back to the
fact that these people weren't drug addicts before they met
Maxwell and Epstein, they were just kids. They became drug
addicts to deal with the trauma that was put upon
them by Maxwell and Epstein. So when they go and
attack these accusers credibility and talk about the drug issues
and stuff like that, I just shake my head. I know,
if I was sitting in a jerry box, I would
be thinking, well, wait a minute, there were kids when
you abuse them, or when they first came in contact
with you, and now all of a sudden, after those events,
they have these drug problems. How about causation and effect?
And as a juror, I know for sure that I'd
be sitting there thinking that to myself, like, wait a minute, here,
hold on, So you're going to attack the credibility of
these people who are accusing you. Yet they were children thirteen, fourteen,
fifteen years old when they were in your clutches, and
then they develop drug issues and you hammer at home
on them again about the drug issue that quite possibly
was caused by the trauma inflicted upon them by your client. Yeah,
that's a winning strategy. So I don't really know what
else they could possibly have up their sleeve, because you
would think that if they had real hard solid evidence.
We would have heard or seen something about it by now.
All they really have, though, is to try and crush
the credibility of these accusers, And as much as they've
tried to do that, as hard as they have went,
I don't think they've on a good enough job. As
far as the defense goes to sway a juror or
jurors to their side of the story, I think they're
going to have to do that with evidence, and their
chance is going to be this week, thirty five defense witnesses.
Let's see what they bring to the table, but you
better bring receipts. We don't want any nonsense where I'm
not interested in more demeaning of people's character. Let's see
the evidence. You got witnesses, you got DNA evidence. What
do you guys have that proves to us that gland
Maxwell is innocent of these charges? Because so far all
we have is powerful testimony from accusers and a lot
of maybe sos from the defense. So that might work
if you're looking to gaslight some people, but usually that
kind of thing falls flat in the court of law.
So I'm a not sure what the defense is thinking here,
and I'm certainly not sure what they have planned for
this week. But one thing you can be certain of,
they definitely have something up their sleeve. What it's going
to be, if it's going to be impactful, I don't know.
But when you're dealing with people like Christian Everdell and
Bobby Sternham and Laura Meninger and Puglicia and the rest
of them, you know that they're going to have at
least one more scumbaggery trick up their sleeve come this week. Now,
the thirty five witnesses, I found that to be pretty interesting,
considering the fact that, like I said earlier, we were
being told that they might not bring any witnesses up.
Now the question has to be asked, is Maxwell herself
going to take the stand? You want to talk about fireworks? Now?
I highly doubt that they're going to have Maxwell take
the stand, but boy would that be something. Guesses that
she would end up looking like Prince Andrew on that
stand when Prince Andrew was doing the interview with Emily
Maitliss where he got absolutely rocked by her. Now, imagine
a real interrogator asking those questions, somebody who does it
for a living. So I don't know, if the defense
is going to test those waters, and my opinion is,
and remember just my opinion, if we do see Glaine
Maxwell on the stand, it's a hail mary attempt by
the defense to try and get their client off the hook. Here,
we have an article this morning that goes into this
a little bit. It's from Bloomberg Quint and it talks
about Maxwell's plans for the week and how she plans
to call thirty five defense witnesses. This is an article
that was authored by Tina Davis, and we're going to
dive into it real quick and take a quick look
at what she has to say is coming up for
the week ahead. Glenn Maxwell's defense team has listed thirty
five witnesses that they plan to call in her defense,
according to a court filing. The identities of the witnesses
is not public, but prosecutors revealed the number in a
letter to the judge on Sunday. So again, thirty five
defense witnesses. Thirty five. I don't know how they think
that that's going to happen in two days, But again
I'm not some kind of court reporter or anything like that.
Maybe this is the usual process to roll through these
witnesses quick as hell. But if they're thirty five witnesses
and they want to get done by say, Friday, like
they talked about, it's kind of fifteen witnesses of a day.
Roughly seventeen witnesses a day, so that's a lot. So
I don't know, maybe this bleeds over into the next
week right as the defense continues to formulate their strategy,
it might end up being a little bit longer. Three
of the defense witnesses have asked to testify under their
first names or a pseudonym, but the prosecutors oppose this.
Maxwell's lawyer, Bobby Sternham said in a filing late Sunday.
Maxwell's four accusers were allowed to testify against her over
the first two weeks of the trial with pseudonyms or
using only their first names. So I think that it
would be fair right to let people anonymously come here
and testify. If that's something that the court usually does,
and they're not making any special request favors for Maxwell's team,
then I don't see a problem with that, I guess.
I mean, again, look, if there's a procedure that's already
on the books for this sort of thing to happen,
then that's something that any defendant should have access to, right.
I'm not in the business of vigilante justice or people
not having access to all of their rights. I think
that all of us, even the most monstrous amongst us,
deserve those sorts of rights if we get into trouble.
I think that it shows what sort of society we
live in when we treat the most disgusting amongst us
as you know, human beings for the most part as
far as their punishment. But I'm not one of these
people who is pitchforks and torches at somebody's house for
vigilante justice type shit. So if this is something that
is done usually for witnesses at a trial as far
as the defense goes when it's a touchy subject, then fine,
if they can work it out and the judge okays
it and the prosecution's cool with it whatever, because really,
at the end of the day, it's going to come
down to the testimony, right, and what are these people?
What could you possibly say to Bolster Glen Maxwell as
a human being? Oh well, we were at the cavier
of the caviar party together, and you know, she gave
me some extra caviare, I don't there's really nothing you're
gonna be able to say about this lady that's going
to bolster her image. So the court's ruling on this
issue may impact the willingness of these witnesses to testify,
thereby compromising mix Miss Maxwell's right to present her defense
and may affect the witness order, Sternham wrote to the judge. Now, also,
what this could do is set it up for some
kind of retrial later on or basis for appeal. So
that's another reason why I think they should just go
ahead and let these people testify, even if it's uh anonymously,
these three people, because I don't want the I don't
want Maxwell to have any wiggle room when all of
this is said and done about how it wasn't done
correctly or people were you know, cutting corners and the
prosecution didn't file this piece of paperwork, or we didn't
get to hear from this witness. I don't want to
hear any of that. I want this lady to go
to prison and I want that to be the end
of her right. None of this is drawn out nonsense,
how the court didn't do things correctly and end up
with like a Bill Cosby situation. Prosecutors had complained to
the judge that the defense didn't tell them the order
in which the witnesses will be called. Sternham wrote that
the defense has provided a tentative order, but that it
is still trying to make travel arrangements for defense witnesses,
many of whom are coming from locations out of the
district and abroad. So I guess Glenn Maxwell has a
train full of people that are showing up from abroad
and outside of the district to the tune of thirty
five witnesses. Now, I'm very interested to see this witness list.
I'm very very interested to see who they have dug
up to come out and play witness for Gallainne Maxwell,
because boy seems like everybody's running from the hills when
it comes to Glane Maxwell and their relationship with her previously,
and it doesn't seem to be any different now, right.
Have you heard anybody coming out in the press to
her defense. Not really, not for the most part. When
she was arrested, you had like a Heraldo Rivieria talking
about how she should be bailed out, a couple of
other stunods, But for the most part, nobody has been
here championing Glen Maxwell's cause. So it's interesting to me
that they're going to have thirty five witnesses. Now, how
many of those witnesses are going to be paid for professionals,
That's another question that's on my mind. I'm guessing a
lot of them, or at least a good number of them,
are going to be professionals in certain areas forensics, memory experts,
like we know they're talking about calling, you know, a
bunch of different things in that vein as well as
far as testimony. So they're gonna get underway on Thursday
and get this whole entire thing kicked off from the
defense perspective, and it's going to be very very interesting
to see what they come up with. Also, before we
go today, I wanted to touch on another article from
Reuters and this article was authored by Luke Cohen and
it talks about how the accusers place Glain Maxwell at
the center of Epstein's abuse and it's definitely something we've
touched on here as well. The picture that they have
painted during the past two weeks by the survivors, by
the accusers giving the testimony has been damning. It has
placed Glenn Maxwell at the center of the nexus. It
has made Gallan Maxwell not just a bystander or somebody
who's along for the It's put her directly in a
leadership role where according to these abusers, she's also engaged
in the abuse herself, as well as the grooming and
as well as the whole entire setting up the abuse.
So I think that the testimony from the accusers has
been absolutely strong and very damning for Gleanne Maxwell, and
it has been certainly the foundationally. The building blocks have
been set that Maxwell was there, She paid out money,
she was involved, making phone calls, doing introductions, all of it.
So when it comes to putting Gleanne Maxwell at the
quote unquote scene of the crime, she seems to be
there quite a bit when all of this abuse takes place.
So let's take a look at this article from Reuter's
Real Quick and let's see what they have to say.
Two weeks of emotional explicit testimony at Glene Maxwell's sex
abuse trial from four women who said the British socialite
co conspirator, general all around scusbag, bipedal serpent, you mean
groom them as teenagers for deceased financier pedophile Jeffrey Epstein
could largely undercut the defense's argument that prosecutors are using
Maxwell as a scapegoat. Legal experts said, yeah, pretty much
what I said too. Look, you don't need to be
a legal expert to understand that Maxwell's at the scene
of the crime here over and over and over again.
You don't have to be a legal expert here to
understand that the stories that these girls are telling are heartbreaking,
and all of them involve Glene Maxwell and some form
of abuse or grooming. The women who say they met
Maxwell at different times in places as far flowing as Florida,
New Mexico and London, all portrayed her essential to the
sexual encounters they had with Epstein. And there's no doubt
about it. And remember, this is just a small handful
of people who have accused Maxwell and Epstein of this behavior,
a very small scope. So when you think about all
of it, the whole entire, overall operation that they were running,
it is obscene, obscene that it was able to a
go on for as long as it did, and b
that so many people are still shielded by the NPA
for the crimes that they obviously committed. Maxwell's attorneys did
rattle three of the four accusers during during tough cross examination,
and scored two favorable rulings from Judge Alison Nathan, who
said that two of the four women prosecutors called victims
were old enough to consent at the time of the
alleged encounters. But as the defense prepares to mount its case,
persuading jurors that Maxwell was not involved will be difficult.
Some experts said one hundred percent. And let's remember here, Okay,
I don't care if you're fourteen or forty five. If
you're being trafficked for sexual purposes, that's not okay. The
fact that she was sixteen in New Mexico is absurd
to me that we would sit here and act like, well,
legal age of consent. There was no consent there. It
wasn't a nineteen year old guy with a sixteen year
old girlfriend. We're talking about two super powerful people who
brought Annie over state lines to New Mexico with the
explicit purpose in mind of abusing her because they knew
the age of consent in Mexico was sixteen. Now, chew
on that for a minute. Tell me it doesn't make
you want to vomit, because that's exactly what they did.
Go back to the episode I uploaded, if Jeffrey Epstein
chose New Mexico for a reason, and it's all right there.
The government has done a good job keeping the jerry
focused on Maxwell, said Sarah Chrissoff, a partner at law
firm Dave Pitney and former federal prosecutor. The government will
argue that the fact that each victim has a different
story and didn't exaggerate Maxwell's role in that story demonstrates
the credibility of those accounts. Prosecutors who say Maxwell recruited
and groomed four teenage girls for Epstein from nineteen ninety
four to two thousand and four rested their case on
Friday in Manhattan Federal Court. And look it was again
powerful testimony. The article goes on to say, when you
skip down a little bit, the remarkable, the remarkably similar
accounts of the accusers could help undermine that argument, experts said,
And they're talking about her being a convenient stand in
for Epstein. And again, these girls didn't know each other,
they didn't all show up together and cancoct this story.
So you're telling me all of these girls they're all
connected with telekinesis, and they figured out the story like that,
here's an idea, here's something to chew on for Maxwell
and her team. How about this, how about it's all true.
How about all of this really happened and Glenn Maxwell
was a central part to all of it. Massages in
Maxwell's central role in them came up repeatedly during the
women's testimony. Now we all know that massages for Jeffrey
Epstein and his crew was shorthand for sex. That's what
they call them massages. Oh, Jeffrey needs to have three
massages a day. Jane, who said she was fourteen in
nineteen ninety four when Epstein first abused her, testified that
Maxwell would sometimes participate when massages later escalated into sexual encounters.
Prosecut said the women's testimony provided them with details which
are crucial to prove charges that Maxwell entice the girls
to travel across state lines and in some cases paid
them for sexual activity. And here's where I don't get
the fact that there's not the Man Act slapped on her.
Why isn't she being smashed with the Man Act? That's
what it was created for for state lines, for sex.
Trafficking over state lines, but yet she's not blasted with it.
It's absurd, just like her not being it with Rico
is absurd. So the article just goes on to talk
a little bit more about some of the things that
occurred over the last couple of weeks, and we're not
going to rehash all of that. I just wanted to
touch on a few points in this article. And it's
going to be interesting to see where the defense goes, folks.
And as we sit here on Monday waiting for Thursday
to roll around, one thing certainly obvious that the defense
is going to actually have to amount some sort of
tangible defense. That just attacking the credibility of these accusers
is not going to be enough. So now the question remains,
what exactly does the defense have left up its sleeve.
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
at Bobby Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo bbuy
c ap U c Ci at ProtonMail dot com. You
can also find me on Twitter at bo bbuy Underscore
c ap U c CI. The links that we discussed
can be found in the description box. All right, folks,
I'll be back later on tonight with the evening update
and we will see what is going on. Then, hope
that all of you have a great Monday. What's up everyone,
and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. Today is the
thirteen day of the Gallaine Maxwell trial, but we find
ourselves in a recess as the defense prepares to mount
their argument to counter what the prosecution brought to the
table for the past two weeks. Now, one question that
has been hanging out there so far during this trial
is where is Scott Borgerson. Now, for those of you
who are not aware who Scott Borgerson is, he is
the man who allegedly married Gallainne Maxwell in twenty and sixteen. Now,
when he did that, he left his wife, left his
kids to marry Gallaine Maxwell. Now he's probably thinking at
that time that everything's rosy and golden, right. Epstein's still
active running around doing his thing, molesting people, raping people,
the whole nine and Glenn Maxwell, up until lab point,
was still protected by that non prosecution agreement. So all
of these folks thought they had gotten away with it,
didn't they. So Scott Borgerson thinks it's a good idea
to leave his wife, leave his kids, and shack up
with Glaine Maxwell, thinking that he just hit the jackpot, right,
I'm hooking up with this socialite. Oh she's an heiress.
Oh this that the other thing. Well, joke's on you, douchebag.
It's like opening up brilliantly wrapped present right for Christmas
and then on the inside it's just cole. This guy
really thought that he was gonna leave his wife and
his kids for Glaine Maxwell, and the train that is
known as Karma was never going to arrive at his station.
Come on, man, this dude's an absolute clown, and the
fact that he is mia right now with Maxwell on
child tells you everything you need to know about him.
In fact, not only is the Miia, according to this
report in the New York Post we're about to touch on,
he's already moved on and he got himself a nice
little yoga enthusiast who lives in Manchester by the Sea
where him and Glane were seen shacked up. So we're
gonna take a quick look at this article in the
New York Post before we move on to some of
our other headlines and see what they have to say
about Scott Borgerson and what this clown is up to
right now headline Glene Maxwell's mysterious hubby, Scott Borgerson, once
seduced by her power now Mia. The author of this
article is Carrie J. Burne. Glenn Maxwell's future husband became
into intoxicated by the limelight, the beautiful airass shined on
his life, the beautiful heiras come on, beautiful, get them
glasses fixed, my friend now Scott Borgerson, who secretly married
Maxwell in twenty sixteen. I mean, what secretly married her?
What is this? Anakin Skywalker sneaking off to marry Queen Almidala?
What is going on? Sneaking off? Now? Scott Borgerson, who
secretly married Maxwell in twenty sixteen, has left her to
face the glare of international incrimination alone while he johns
around his exclusive coastal New England town in sports cars,
often in the company of an attractive new female friend.
So my guess is, oh, boy, saw the writing on
the wall here. Glane wasn't getting bailed out. She wasn't
going to be able to hit the bricks before this trial.
And Scott Borgerson couldn't abide by that, couldn't wait on
his bow Glaine to get out of jail right, So
figure that's it. I'm gonna move on. But what's funny
is all the way up to that point, when she
was looking to get Bell, we had Borgerson and you know,
money ties with Maxwell as far as Bell goes all
over the place. But now all of a sudden, dude's
Mia has wants nothing to do with her. And this
is probably the reason why Borgerson, forty six, Maxwell's enigmatic
and much younger husband, apparently broke up his first marriage
to be with the British jet setter, captivated by the
circles of power she made available to him. Friends say,
now think about that for a minute. How heinous is
that shit? Imagine leaving your chick because you think that
you're going to be able to climb the social ladder
a little bit more. Now, mind you, he was already
the CEO of a tech company. He was already a
guy who had a bunch of dough. And it's not enough, right,
you have to shit on your family. You have to
treat your wife like garbage, leave your children and go
shack up with Maxwell because you a little bit more. Oh,
I have to be in the middle of whatever these
people are doing. The whole entire thing is absurd to me. Folks,
When you got people like this guy who was willing
to sacrifice everything he's built, his wife, his family, I'm
sure all of the ties they built together for somebody
like Maxwell just to increase their power or to increase
their access to people in power. It tells you everything
you need to know about the people in question. There's
not a single person on this planet that would have
me leave in my girl. I don't care what sort
of access to whatever power it led to. But as
Lura details unfold in a Manhattan courtroom of the international
sex ring that Maxwell fifty nine allegedly ran with billionaire
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Borgerson remains two hundred miles away at
the secluded three point nine million dollar waterfront to state
he once shared with the disgraced Madam. So not only
did he, you know, kick rocks and decide he's not
showing up, but now he's staying at that same place
where he was at with Maxwell. So again it just
goes to show you how false and how fake everything
is when it comes to relationships with these people. It's
all about personal gain. How I'm going to be able
to climb the ladder. Am I going to be able
to benefit from this? And as long as that's the case,
these people are in doesn't matter who they're shacked up with,
doesn't matter who they're dealing with, what their past behavior was,
doesn't matter. I mean, you mean to tell me that
Scott Borgerson never heard anything about Glen Maxwell and her
behavior with Jeffrey Epstein. She never heard a word about
any of that. Huh. It's ridiculous, man. And now, all
of a sudden, when everything's being blasted in the headlines,
when his name is being brought up, he's hiding out
over in Manchester by the Sea. Borgerson apparently has more
important things to do than a pure by her side
in court. One Manchester neighbor told the Post Manchester by
the Sea is an old money enclave of fifty four
hundred people, coveted by Boston's elite for its scenic beaches
and four hundred year old colonial charm. Local residents and
photographers have seen Borgersen driving through the town with McGinn,
forty nine years old, in his sleek black Tesla s
or trendy black Mini Cooper. I mean, is there anything
that signifies this guy as a bigger douchebag his trendy
black Mini Cooper. Really, bro, you're a grown ass man.
What are you doing driving around in a Mini Cooper?
He gives her a kissy kiss every time they're together.
One observer noted. A source says the two have spent
weekends together when McGinn didn't have to watch her children,
and that she was bubbling about the relationship. I'm sure
that her ex is bubbling about it as well. Right,
just what I want my children around Gallaine Maxwell's ex husband, perfect,
exactly what the doctor ordered. You want to talk about
a custody dispute, let somebody bring my kids. If I
had some around, somebody like Gallaine Maxwell, you better call
Saul after that trip. Borgerson and McGinn are both dog owners,
observers said, and may have bonded over their shared love
of animals. It's crazy. So anyway, we were not gonna
read the whole entire thing. We're just gonna, you know,
touch on it a bit here. Wanted to give you
a little context of what I was talking about. I'm
also going to post an article about Scott Borgerson a
little bit later, a look back article like we've been
doing to add more context to all of this. But
it's just comical when the chips are down for these people,
the so called elite, when they're in the middle of
a court battle for their lives. Basically, you see all
of the other so called elite run for the hills,
and Scott Borgerson here certainly no different. We know that
their relationship as far as for Borgerson, who knows what
Maxwell was up to, what sort of game she was
up to, But for Borgerson, definitely it was all about
climbing that social ladder, and a typical of one of
these people, they will shit on anybody they possibly can,
family or not, if it means that they are going
to be invited to that big club that George Carlin
always talked about, you know, the one that we're not
invited to. That's the one that they're all hanging out
at all of the time. So the next topic I
wanted to touch on real quick while we're here, is
this Gallainne Maxwell trial tracker account that was suspended on Twitter,
breaking news. That person just showed up to the party recently. Anyway,
it wasn't like this big long investigative procedure that they
were up to, like they were bringing all of the
news from the ground, And when I saw people try
and conflate that as oh, well, the whole trial's being censored,
that's ridiculous. That's not the issue, right the Glaine Maxwell
trial Twitter account being suspended, that was somebody grifting. Let's
be real. The really issue is real censorship when people
who are really bringing knowledge out, people who were really
dropping kernels of truth, when they're censored, that's a problem.
But as far as the Glane Maxwell trial tracker account,
it was a bunch of nonsense really anyway, just stuff
that they were collecting and reposting. It wasn't like they
were on the ground there at the trial. You want
to check out somebody who's been on the ground at
the trial. Checkout Addakin over at Addie Adds. Dude Solid.
I did a great interview with him over on his
show a while back, and he's a solid guy, doing
great work. He's somebody who is on the ground, has
been there for the whole trial, lives relatively close, well
not relatively close, but you know, in the vicinity I
would say, took the time out of his own life
to go up there to bring people the truth from
what's going on on the ground, and then you have
somebody like the Glen Maxwell trial tracker, like five hundred
and twenty five thousand people following it, and I know,
not just me, but a bunch of other people who
have been following this case since pretty much the beginning.
As far as the second arrest, everybody was like, who
the hell is this person? So I thought that all
of the hubbub seeing it in the news and like
it was this big deal. Pretty laughable to me, honestly,
because you could totally see that it was a spam account, right,
somebody who look at the join date and it was
somebody who was looking to benefit on the back of
all of this, right, jump in right when it all
started and hopefully, you know, get some traffic to whatever
handle they came up with. So when I saw that
in the news, I shook my head and found it laughable.
And I got to a couple of messages about it
as well, and I figured we touch on it right
now while we're here and doing this update. And for me,
you all know that I hate censorship one hundred percent,
and honestly, I wouldn't have even censored the Gallaine Maxwell
trial tracker on Twitter, to be honest with you, if
it was up to me. But it's not like it
was the all encompassing point of information for what's going
on at that trial. That's not the case. There are Look,
don't get it twisted. There are dozens and dozens of
journalists on the ground covering this. That's not I don't
take umbrage with that. My point is the big news stations,
all of the real life legacy media that is pumping
into everyone's homes twenty four hours a day, little to
no coverage, no big meetings, no big conferences of the experts,
none of that stuff. That's wall to wall coverage. But
when you're talking about on the ground, there certainly are
people from outlets from all over the world covering this,
no doubt about it. But as far as listening to
independent sources from on the ground, nobody knows who the
glame Maxwell trial tracker is and there's certainly not somebody
who's on the ground getting this information in real time.
So while I am not a fan of censorship in
any regard, for the most part, I don't think it's
this huge loss as far as information for the public
to lose something like that all right. So, the last
topic I want to touch on tonight before we wrap
things up is the Black Book and how Judge Nathan
has ruled that only a little bit of what's in
that Black Book is going to be published. That's not
under seal. But the good thing is we have access
to the names that have been published in there. Anyway previously,
we have confirmed that stuff. It's been confirmed in the news.
So while Judge Nathan once again not being a friend
of transparency here as far as releasing all of this stuff,
the good thing here is there's been an end around
already and a lot of that information is out there
for those of you who are interested in it. In fact,
over at Mother Jones, one of the reporters called every
single person in that Black Book. I have an episode
about that. I've posted it previously, and I guess I'll
upload that again considering it is something that is we're,
you know, a topic that's being discussed. Well, I'll upload
that again so you can get a little more about
the Black Book and what Mother Jones did. But there
was a lot of talk about how it was Epstein's
Black Book, and it always made sense to people who
followed the case and a lot of the survivors as well,
Maria and others that it was really Maxwell's Black Book
the whole entire time. Epstein wasn't the one in charge
of the maintenance, if you will. He wasn't the one
in charge of setting things up as far as the
massages or anything like that. It was Galayn Maxwell that
was his in to the social circles. And that is
how come they were so good together, right. Maxwell provided
the in inside of the social circles, while Jeffrey Epstein
he had the inn with all of the financial people.
He had that area covered, and then you bring them
together and you have their criminal enterprise that they were
rocking and rolling with for literally decades. But the Black
Book had always been a Glaine Maxwell production. And the
people inside of that Black Book, while they're friends of
both of them, it would make sense that it would
be Glainne Maxwell who would be in charge of that process,
right because she was the social climber. She was the
revolving door for the social world for Jeffrey Epstein, all
of those big shots, Prince Andrew the rest. Maxwell opened
that door. We know that Jeffrey Epstein was no social icon.
We know that he was somebody who was not locked
in to that upper crust. He didn't come from generational wealth.
And to open those doors, you have to come from
generational wealth, not somebody who got money a few weeks ago.
Not somebody who got money a few days ago. You
have to be part of the gang, right and Glainne
Maxwell for everything else most certainly was that certainly part
of the gang. And here in an article in the
Sun they talk about how only a few pages are
at issue in the case and prosecution agreed that the
book can be used for a limited purpose, for limited purpose.
So again the small scope of this case comes back
to bite everybody. The small scope of this case brought
by the SDNY is honestly a travesty, and because of
that small scope, only a few pages of this are
going to be used as evidence in this trial. But
like I said earlier, the good thing is the Black
Book is available out there for people who want to
look at it. You could find it in many different places.
It's quick Internet search and you're on your way. But
I thought that it was interesting that only a few
pages were going to be used here. And once again
it's because of the scope. I know there's a lot
of people that are asking why it's not more of
a deeper look into all of Epstein's associates, And look,
we all have the same issues, right, we all have
the same questions in that regard, But when it comes
to this specific trial and this specific situation, it is
only for that ten year scope, so they're going to
limit it. And when it comes to this Black Book,
we all know that every single person in that Black
Book had some sort of business relationship or a personal
relationship with Epstein and Maxwell at the very least, Why
else are you in that book? What are they're just
going around and collecting names in it. It was in
ninth grade and you're going around collecting signatures and people
to sign your your book. There's a reason those names
are in there, and it's so that they can be
in contact with Epstein and Maxwell. Now, it's going to
be interesting as the week unfolds and we prepare for
Thursday to see what other evidence and perhaps if there's
other witnesses that we're going to hear about that aren't
under seal that are going to take the stand, because
you know, the defense is working overtime to gum things up,
and that's my guess on why they're talking about so
many witnesses as well. They'd like to throw a wrench
in things for the prosecutors, make it more difficult on
them and kind of keep them on their heels. Perhaps
that's my guess anyway, But we'll see, because it's going
to be Thursday very soon, and until then we'll continue
to lay out the information as it comes in and
continue to build those foundational blocks we keep talking about,
because the defense is going to have their day to
you know, bring forth the evidence that they think is
going to get their client off, and we're looking at
two days at least, possibly three, maybe a couple more.
I don't know. There's been talk all over the place
about it. So until we get there, we'll continue to
add context and a little more meat to the bone.
So that's gonna wrap it up for tonight, folks, and
I hope that everybody had a great day, But for me,
I will be back tomorrow and we're gonna start this
process all over again. If you'd like to contact me,
you can do that at Bobby Kapucci at ProtonMail dot com.
That's b O. B B Y c ap you c
CI at ProtonMail dot com, and you can also find
me on Twitter at bo bby underscore, c ap U,
c c I. The links that we discussed can be
found in the description box.