Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the tenth of September.
Speaker 1: He're of our Lord twenty twenty four. Well, tonight is
Speaker 1: the big event, and so it is a pageant, and
Speaker 1: it's a lot of theater. We're gonna start with that.
Speaker 1: We're gonna show you the other theater. We're going to
Speaker 1: show you the polls back and forth. As I said yesterday,
Speaker 1: it truly is a horse race now, and you can
Speaker 1: bet on it, not just in Vegas, but you can
Speaker 1: bet on it with the futures markets. And so you'll
Speaker 1: want to watch it tonight so that you can get
Speaker 1: those bets placed. Maybe you can win some money. We're
Speaker 1: gonna start with that. We also have some very strange
Speaker 1: we now have the neo robot is now spending some
Speaker 1: time at people's homes. Yeah, we are starting to live
Speaker 1: in some really strange times. We'll talk about the implications
Speaker 1: of it, even from their own PR video. There's some
Speaker 1: huge implications about this, of course, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Stay with us. Yes, tonight's big event. It's like the
Speaker 1: Super Bowl, the Grand Slam, WrestleMania all rolled into one.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, we get a solicitation for
Speaker 1: an interview from a book company and they're selling this book,
Speaker 1: Trump's Sandbox. It's for kids. I look at this, it's like,
Speaker 1: uh no, no, we're not going to do that. But
Speaker 1: you know, you can fit so many different people into
Speaker 1: that sandbox. It truly is amazing. It kind of reminds me.
Speaker 1: And this was sent to me by a listener doctor Fauci.
Speaker 1: How a boy from Brooklyn became America's favorite doctor. And
Speaker 1: if you look at this, there's Fauci, and I guess
Speaker 1: he's thinking back to that time in Bedford Falls where
Speaker 1: he was working at the pharmacy place. Fauci's pharmacy is
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, that shows on here and as
Speaker 1: a delivery boy, I guess. And in his version of
Speaker 1: the story, he's the one who actually puts the poison
Speaker 1: in consciously and takes it to the people. It isn't
Speaker 1: that he stops the pharmacist who's grieving over his lost son. No,
Speaker 1: if doctor Fauci actually puts the poison in and delivers
Speaker 1: it science, he got some science for you, right, just
Speaker 1: what you would Well, anyway, we got the Trump sandbox.
Speaker 1: And of course as you watch the debate, if you do,
Speaker 1: because you know you want to get your bets in
Speaker 1: on the futures market. If you watch it, just keep
Speaker 1: this in mind.
Speaker 2: Pageant. We need a theme, a song, some visuals we need.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a pageant. It's a paget. It's a pageant,
Speaker 1: that's what it is. It's Miss America in your birth part. Yeah,
Speaker 1: It'smiss American your Burke parts, or it's Miss America you're
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And uh, I don't know if he's going
Speaker 1: to be checking out La La Harrison the dressing room beforehand,
Speaker 1: like I used to have the other parties. But she's
Speaker 1: got her own thing going. She's got a guy dressed
Speaker 1: up in a wig in high heels and a podium
Speaker 1: and lights and all this other kind of stuff, you know,
Speaker 1: just to help La La to get into them. Man,
Speaker 1: they've got to go all kinds of extra preparation. Is
Speaker 1: what happens when you pick people like Lala and Biden
Speaker 1: who can't tie their shoes to be a spokesperson. That's there.
Speaker 1: But I think it's not just it's not just whygg
Speaker 1: the dog. It is also what Thomas Massey had to
Speaker 1: say about the whole budget process, and I would.
Speaker 3: Call on mister Massey, can we be honest with the
Speaker 3: American people about what's going on here?
Speaker 4: This is political theater.
Speaker 3: I'm going to call out both sides right here. It's
Speaker 3: all posturing as fake fighting. We all know where it
Speaker 3: ends up. This is groundhog Day. I don't care if
Speaker 3: the Democrat is a speaker or Republican is speaker. We
Speaker 3: always get a cr in September, and then we get
Speaker 3: an omnibus because there's a twist on that we might
Speaker 3: get the omnibus before Christmas, but if we're not good,
Speaker 3: it comes after Christmas. But that's what's going to happen.
Speaker 3: And in the meantime it's political theater. You know, we've
Speaker 3: got it's good theater. We've got great writers. I wish
Speaker 3: they'd just come.
Speaker 2: Up with a new plot.
Speaker 4: It's the same plot every fiscal year.
Speaker 1: What should we be doing?
Speaker 3: It's already been discussed. We should have done twelve separate bills.
Speaker 3: We should have done twelve separate bills. But again, whether
Speaker 3: Democrats are in controller or Republicans are in control, we
Speaker 3: never do the twelve separate bills. Why do we always
Speaker 3: spend at least as much as we did last year.
Speaker 4: And why do we never cut spending.
Speaker 3: It's because Democrats want to grow the welfare state and
Speaker 3: Republicans want to grow the military industrial complex. And we're
Speaker 3: eventually going to get together and they're both going to
Speaker 3: go up.
Speaker 4: I guarant damn tee it.
Speaker 3: And both parties are just fine letting the bureaucrats do
Speaker 3: their thing, which should be our thing. According to Article one,
Speaker 3: Section eight in the Constitution.
Speaker 4: We are empowered with these things.
Speaker 3: Most important of the things we do is the funding,
Speaker 3: and that's the big.
Speaker 4: Lever we have.
Speaker 1: Well, he nailed it, isn't he As the bureaucracies do
Speaker 1: their thing, which is really supposed to be our thing.
Speaker 1: As I've said for the longest time, they abdicated everything
Speaker 1: they do. We don't have taxation without representation, we have
Speaker 1: regulation without representation. So he says, yeah, this bill, of
Speaker 1: this omnibus bill, it should have been twelve separate bills.
Speaker 1: I guess I could say that about the presidential election.
Speaker 1: I should have started with twelve separate candidates. But they
Speaker 1: are predetermined what they're gonna do. We wind up with
Speaker 1: an omnibus election. They just put these two in the
Speaker 1: pot and you're gonna choose from them in the store. Sorry. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we should have had separate elections. We should have had debates,
Speaker 1: We should have had open ballots. We should when we're
Speaker 1: looking at these well, they're not even talking about issues.
Speaker 1: It's all about their personalities. That's the other thing about it.
Speaker 1: It's become such a high school student council melodrama. Discuss me.
Speaker 1: And I'm just as tired of this process as Thomas
Speaker 1: Messey is. You can call me a black pill, but
Speaker 1: it's experience. I've seen this before over and over again.
Speaker 1: It's a bad rerun. It's a bad remake straight out
Speaker 1: of Hollywood. Wag the Dog number twenty one or whatever,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean, it's ridiculous. What is happening with this?
Speaker 1: We have this, We should have as he said, you know,
Speaker 1: we should have had twelve separate bills. He said, See,
Speaker 1: part of the problem is as they talk about the
Speaker 1: omnibus bill, they put everything in there, and it's like, well,
Speaker 1: you take everything or everything, and that's the way it
Speaker 1: is the presidential candidates, and that's the way it is
Speaker 1: with everything in Washington. Quite frankly, even if we had
Speaker 1: twelve separate bills. Washington isn't the place. This is where
Speaker 1: I would have slight disagreement with Thomas Massey. Washington's not
Speaker 1: the place to get most things done. And I think
Speaker 1: he would say that as well. I mean, he understands
Speaker 1: what's going on in the bureaucracy, understands that Washington is
Speaker 1: involved in things that they should not be involved in.
Speaker 1: So I think he understands that. So we should have
Speaker 1: fifty different governments that are making different decisions about stuff
Speaker 1: where we actually have something of a say, and then
Speaker 1: subdivide that into a lot of more local governments where
Speaker 1: we have more of a say. And until you start
Speaker 1: working towards that, all the rest of this stuff, this pageant,
Speaker 1: this WrestleMania, this Grand Slam, this super Bowl, this is
Speaker 1: all just a distraction. And the same way that these
Speaker 1: debates over the amount of money that they're going to
Speaker 1: put us into debt, They're just going to conjure up
Speaker 1: the bills. Right, let's just we're not even going to
Speaker 1: run a printing press. We just reimagine the numbers, just poof.
Speaker 1: I just put it on the computer. As they said
Speaker 1: the other day, well you know you're printing a lot
Speaker 1: of money in the The FED chair at the time said, well,
Speaker 1: we're not actually printing the money, you know, we couldn't
Speaker 1: do that. I said, yeah, think about how much paper
Speaker 1: that would take. You can't even imagine it. So now
Speaker 1: it has to be paperless, the paperless fiat currency. It's
Speaker 1: got nothing, not even the paper is tangible. It's all
Speaker 1: just conjured up. It's magic money. That's the m empty
Speaker 1: the magic money theory. I know they say it's modern
Speaker 1: monetary theory, but it's magic money theory. They just conjure
Speaker 1: it up. And then it's like Mickey Mouse and the
Speaker 1: Sorcerer's Apprentice, you know, it's control and the bureaucracy just
Speaker 1: keeps bringing in more water and we're underwater already, but
Speaker 1: that doesn't stop them. And of course that won't be
Speaker 1: the discussion tonight. It'll be back and forth, it'll be personal,
Speaker 1: it'll be vindictive. So for six weeks, la LA's campaign
Speaker 1: has been running circles around Donald Trump's efforts, says Real
Speaker 1: Clear Politics. They've raised tons of money, energized their base,
Speaker 1: five hundred million dollars the first couple of weeks so far,
Speaker 1: then in August another three hundred and fifty folks. That's obscene,
Speaker 1: it's criminal. It truly is, as hl Menkin said, an
Speaker 1: advanced auction of stolen goods. And it is just the
Speaker 1: people just buying influence with her. And when we stop
Speaker 1: and think about it, if they're going to spend billions
Speaker 1: of dollars to buy these presidential candidates and the group
Speaker 1: that's around them, what does that tell you about what
Speaker 1: they're going to spend. Because they don't spend just ten times,
Speaker 1: they spend twenty thirty times what they actually take in.
Speaker 1: That's why so much money is flowing into Washington. The
Speaker 1: best investment you can make isn't a politician terms of
Speaker 1: return on investment, So that's going to turn out two
Speaker 1: or three trillion dollars being passed around as we have seen.
Speaker 1: That was what the whole Inflation Reduction Act was about.
Speaker 1: Biden just recently I think he said, well, okay, that
Speaker 1: was an inflation We worked on the Green New Deal,
Speaker 1: the Inflation Reduction Act. We should have called it what
Speaker 1: it really was. And then he abruptly stops not to
Speaker 1: talk about it being the Green New Deal. What it's
Speaker 1: not even the Green New Deal. It's the Green New
Speaker 1: steal massive transfer of wealth, trillions of dollars to people
Speaker 1: like Elon Musk your hero if you're a conservative, I guess,
Speaker 1: and I'm not the listeners who listen to this program,
Speaker 1: But if Elon Musk is your hero, you would have
Speaker 1: turned this program all of a long time ago, just
Speaker 1: like he did on Twitter. But yeah, it's these people
Speaker 1: who he's going to become the world's first trillionaire. He's
Speaker 1: on the path to do that in just a couple
Speaker 1: of years, especially because of these battery battery energy storage
Speaker 1: sites that are going to be used to back up
Speaker 1: the unreliable, unstable solar and wind power these battery energy
Speaker 1: storage sites, and it still won't be reliable, but it
Speaker 1: will be very, very, very expensive. As I point out yesterday,
Speaker 1: if you look at the cost of these things, you're
Speaker 1: looking at paying probably twenty eight times what you're paying
Speaker 1: right now. That's how you're going to own nothing. You'll
Speaker 1: own nothing, you won't even be able to get electricity
Speaker 1: better start to And the irony of all this stuff
Speaker 1: is that right now, you know they're selling the solar
Speaker 1: panels and stuff at below cost what it costs them
Speaker 1: blow costs for the price below costs for the energy
Speaker 1: that goes into him. It doesn't make any sense. But hey,
Speaker 1: you know, you can get some of your own power
Speaker 1: off the grid, so that's not a bad idea. That's
Speaker 1: just the grid is being destroyed. Make sure you're not
Speaker 1: dependent on the grid. It's all I can say. Whatever
Speaker 1: you do, don't dependent on the grid because they're destroying that.
Speaker 1: You know, these sources of power are more expensive, for sure,
Speaker 1: but you can get independent of the grid, and that's
Speaker 1: a benefit for you one way or the other. The
Speaker 1: time has come for Trump to make the sale. So
Speaker 1: it's real clear politics. Despite his lack of focus and
Speaker 1: Harris's early momentum, polls continue to show a close race.
Speaker 1: Why is that because she is so radically left. That's
Speaker 1: the real aspect of it. By the way, I got
Speaker 1: to kick out of the way he said theater, That's
Speaker 1: the way I used to That's why he Karen was
Speaker 1: from New York and it was a source of endless
Speaker 1: amusement for me to listen to her her heavy New
Speaker 1: York accent. It was very endearing. I got to kick
Speaker 1: out of it, and she got a kick out of
Speaker 1: the way that I talked as well. She thought it
Speaker 1: was funny that I said theater, and she said, well yeah,
Speaker 1: And I said, well, how do y'all say it the theater?
Speaker 1: That's how she says it. So, yeah, he's not from
Speaker 1: New York either. He's from Good Tucky. But anyway, we
Speaker 1: had I guess opposites a tract to some degree, but
Speaker 1: definitely were soulmates and virtually everything else except the way
Speaker 1: we talked. Debates are more often lost than one. He says, so,
Speaker 1: and it really is this. This, This has been Trump's
Speaker 1: election to lose from the very beginning, and he's working
Speaker 1: really hard and very diligently to lose it because he
Speaker 1: just keeps coming out with vicious personal attacks, which if
Speaker 1: he wants to make that kind of stuff and make
Speaker 1: those points that ought to be done by surrogus, but no,
Speaker 1: he's got to do it himself. Why because he's a
Speaker 1: deeply wounded narcissist capable of acting except out of his
Speaker 1: own perceived self interest. And that's the problem. He perceives
Speaker 1: it as his self interest. I don't think he's going
Speaker 1: to listen to any advisors. So for Trump, this person
Speaker 1: said it real clear politics. What he needs. What he
Speaker 1: needs is a chance to unveil a strong, disciplined message. Well,
Speaker 1: he doesn't have a strong he doesn't have a message,
Speaker 1: and it's not strong and it's not disciplined. You know,
Speaker 1: it's his message depends on he's over here focusing on minutia.
Speaker 1: He doesn't have what George H. W. Bush said, that
Speaker 1: vision thing. He doesn't have that vision thing for instance, right,
Speaker 1: instead of a broad economic policy where we need to go,
Speaker 1: what he does is he focuses so much on the
Speaker 1: minutia no tax on tips. Oh okay, well that's an
Speaker 1: economic policy.
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 1: I mean, it is some detail that would be there. Detail,
Speaker 1: but of course he's not going to necessarily deliver on
Speaker 1: But she jumps on it as well. And as I said,
Speaker 1: if both of them agree on it, and the Democrats
Speaker 1: and Republicans agree, and let's just do it. In California,
Speaker 1: you had Republicans call the Democrats bluff. They said, let's
Speaker 1: do the no tax on tips and the Democrats shut
Speaker 1: that down. And so that's really what Mike Johnson should
Speaker 1: do as a matter of fact, that though the bigger issue,
Speaker 1: see it's not no tax on tips. The bigger issue
Speaker 1: is why are you growing the irs giving it eighty
Speaker 1: billion dollars when it's budget is thirteen Why are you
Speaker 1: giving it seven times it's current budget? What's that about?
Speaker 1: How are you weaponizing both parties, weaponizing the irs against
Speaker 1: us while they say, oh, well, we won't do any
Speaker 1: tax on tips. All you waiters and waitresses and all
Speaker 1: the working people out there, shouldn't you be happy about this?
Speaker 1: And it only affects a small portion of them, of course,
Speaker 1: it's all a portion of those of us who work
Speaker 1: on this. But what's the economic policy? Is the economic
Speaker 1: policy to say that we're going to have massive tariffs
Speaker 1: of sixty percent, that's not an economic policy. That's chaos
Speaker 1: and destruction. First of all, he could never do something
Speaker 1: it's absurd. He could never do something that large, and
Speaker 1: if he did, some kind of a shock to the system.
Speaker 1: And you know, he needs to talk about why we
Speaker 1: need to gradually transition to no internal taxes and only
Speaker 1: taxes at the border. But it's got to be a
Speaker 1: gradual transition. And if he jumps into this all at once,
Speaker 1: of course, the big issue is adding those taxes and
Speaker 1: not taking off what we currently have. Which if you're
Speaker 1: going to do taxes at the border tariffs, why do
Speaker 1: you need to grow the internal revenue service, Why do
Speaker 1: you need to grow that by factor of seven? So
Speaker 1: he doesn't address that none of this stuff is real,
Speaker 1: that the message is phony. It simply is this is
Speaker 1: phony from both of them. They don't have any policies.
Speaker 1: They're not strong, they're not disciplined, they're not principled, they
Speaker 1: don't have a plan. There is no plan. The plan
Speaker 1: is I need to be in the white House. That's it.
Speaker 1: This is like some childish two year old. Well, the
Speaker 1: plan is I just need to be in the White
Speaker 1: House because I can save you and she'll kill you
Speaker 1: or vice versa. So debate messaging should reflect the campaign's
Speaker 1: central theme, he says, assuming a campaign has one, he says,
Speaker 1: that's right, does it? Yeah, I don't know what Trump's
Speaker 1: theme is, now I do know what Lama's theme is,
Speaker 1: kill the babies. Kill the babies, women, and free yourselves
Speaker 1: from children. And it doesn't matter what you have to
Speaker 1: do the babies to kill them. Just don't pay attention,
Speaker 1: don't look at And of course the Republicans plan is
Speaker 1: to just passively set by and say we're not for
Speaker 1: as much of whatever the Democrats are for as they are,
Speaker 1: we're for less of whatever they want, that's their plan.
Speaker 1: A little bit less, a little bit less. So he
Speaker 1: says the first words out of Trump's mouth should frame
Speaker 1: the election as a choice between his record and the
Speaker 1: Biden Harris record. This's gonna be Trump's version of Ronald
Speaker 1: Reagan's famous debate line, are you better off than you
Speaker 1: were four years ago? But that's not if he's got
Speaker 1: a theme. His theme is revenge, right, that's perhaps his theme.
Speaker 1: So she's about killing babies, he's about getting personal revenge.
Speaker 1: It's great, and quite frankly, that didn't work out that
Speaker 1: well with Hillary. Her theme was I'm with her. It's
Speaker 1: my turn, and basically that's what Trump is doing this
Speaker 1: time around. It's my turn to come back. You're with me.
Speaker 1: It's all about me, me, me. Trump also needs to
Speaker 1: make the case that Harris is too far left. That
Speaker 1: should be pretty easy. But again, is he don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about any policy. He should cite specific policies
Speaker 1: that she has supported. Biden went along with the progressive left,
Speaker 1: but Harris will be there champion. He could say something
Speaker 1: like that, that's what real clear politics says. So Biden
Speaker 1: just went along with them, but she's a true believer.
Speaker 1: She was out there in front of as the most
Speaker 1: liberal senator at the time. Ranking she wants to ban cars,
Speaker 1: she wants to do Hillary Claire, she wants to do
Speaker 1: all of the radical, radical Marxist leftist things that are
Speaker 1: out there. And I would just say, if I was
Speaker 1: advising him, and just tell everybody that La La is
Speaker 1: Biden's leftover. She's left and she wants to be over you.
Speaker 1: She's the leftover from the Biden or you could say
Speaker 1: she's Willie Brown passed me around. Anyway, you know, you
Speaker 1: could just attack her her basis of getting into politics
Speaker 1: and what her success has already been about. You know,
Speaker 1: Willie Brown passed me around. The most important thing that
Speaker 1: Trump should do is to shut up its real clear politics,
Speaker 1: the limits. And this is why this fight was so important.
Speaker 1: That's why she fought but then gave up. She wanted
Speaker 1: those mics open so she could hector him and so
Speaker 1: get him flustered, and so that he could basically hang
Speaker 1: himself by what he says. By shutting the mic off
Speaker 1: to try to protect Biden from getting flustered, it actually
Speaker 1: worked greatly to Trump's advantage in the first debate. And
Speaker 1: so they decide, well, we'll take the opposite approach, because
Speaker 1: she can heckle him, and she can laugh at him
Speaker 1: and all the rest of the stuff, and they didn't.
Speaker 1: So now there's going to be time limits and there's
Speaker 1: going to be microphones off when it's when you're finished speaking,
Speaker 1: your time is up. And that should help him. That
Speaker 1: should give him a little bit of discipline perhaps, or
Speaker 1: at least make it seem like he's got a more
Speaker 1: disciplined message. There's no reason for him to bring up
Speaker 1: his criminal cases. These are potential traps that Harris will
Speaker 1: have ready made retorts for all of them. He's already
Speaker 1: telegraph that I'm a prosecutor. I lock up people like
Speaker 1: you you fell in. Right, she'll goad him on all this,
Speaker 1: and you know you and I know what these trials
Speaker 1: are about. And so what do you ought to do
Speaker 1: if she takes that line? He ought to say, Yeah,
Speaker 1: we know what it's about. We know that it's about
Speaker 1: political persecution. And you've had a lot of experience with this,
Speaker 1: haven't you Look at what you did to David de
Speaker 1: Leighton when he exposed planned parenthood, and it's murder for
Speaker 1: higher that would be a knock it out of the
Speaker 1: Park approach. He could slam this political persecution thing down
Speaker 1: her throat and the abortion issue at the same time,
Speaker 1: showing it for what it is, trafficking and murder and
Speaker 1: baby parts. But he won't do that, of course. Well, anyway,
Speaker 1: Harris expects him to be a rambling, disruptive character. But
Speaker 1: if instead he's rational and concise and his attacks are
Speaker 1: coherent and focused dreamond it says, not his usual word,
Speaker 1: solid of overstatements and distractions, he could force Harris off
Speaker 1: of her game. So Harris should employ two techniques that
Speaker 1: could throw Trump off the stride. One of them is humor.
Speaker 1: Make a joke and just laugh incessantly, and they don't
Speaker 1: have to answer any questions, right, just laugh it all off.
Speaker 1: That's not a bad strategy for her. It's reprehensible, but
Speaker 1: it's not a bad strategy. Neither Hillary Clinton nor Joe
Speaker 1: Biden effectively used wit against Trump in previous debates. See
Speaker 1: that they should have read. Hillary Clinton, you know, even
Speaker 1: loved the Rules for Radicals by Saul Olensky, and that's
Speaker 1: one of his key rules. Ridicule is the most effective weapon,
Speaker 1: he said. He said, there is no defense against it.
Speaker 1: That would be perfect for her to ridicule Trump over whatever.
Speaker 1: She make it up, even but she ridicules him and
Speaker 1: laughs at him. That would be very effective. The second
Speaker 1: is for Harris to make her points in the form
Speaker 1: of questions. As a lawyer and a senator, she knows
Speaker 1: how to do this. Nothing prohibits candidates from posing questions
Speaker 1: to the audience in the form of statements like Ronald Reagan,
Speaker 1: are you better off than you were four years ago?
Speaker 1: That's essentially what they're talking about. So the other thing
Speaker 1: that I find interesting, of course, is the calendar of
Speaker 1: all this, and of course that was a big part
Speaker 1: of the deliberate orchestrated thing to put Trump in, get
Speaker 1: Biden out, put La La Harris against him. That was
Speaker 1: all orchestrated for a very long time. They planned all
Speaker 1: this stuff. And so when we look at these late
Speaker 1: starting dates, we have been about a week early. Voting
Speaker 1: begins in about seven states. In about a week to
Speaker 1: ten days. North Carolina would have started already except for
Speaker 1: the RK lawsuit, which, by the way, in an update,
Speaker 1: as they said on Friday, Associated Press said that RFK
Speaker 1: Junior got kicked off. Well, that was the first judge
Speaker 1: said that. Then later in the day, you had an
Speaker 1: appeals court judge who said no, he's on and they
Speaker 1: never updated their article. They just left it as he's
Speaker 1: he's still that he was still on the ballot. That
Speaker 1: judge said you can get off of the ballot, okay.
Speaker 1: So it was an RFKJ one when and also in
Speaker 1: Michigan he won. So that was a story late on Friday,
Speaker 1: but the mainstream media associated propaganda AP Drudge, they didn't
Speaker 1: want to report that. Yesterday the Supreme Court in Michigan
Speaker 1: had a ruling and they said you got to stay
Speaker 1: on the ballot. And as I said, I think a
Speaker 1: lot of this stuff they're overestimating how the influence of
Speaker 1: RFK Junior. I don't think it's going to have that
Speaker 1: much influence. As I said, as people get close to
Speaker 1: the election, they revert back to their political tribalism. It
Speaker 1: always happens every time around. It doesn't matter how much
Speaker 1: they dislike the Republicans or the Democrat, they will always
Speaker 1: go back if they identified with the Republicans or Democrats,
Speaker 1: always go back. More than half of the support that
Speaker 1: you see on independence and third party candidates will evaporate
Speaker 1: at the very end and they start to they make
Speaker 1: that decision they're going to support the person the party
Speaker 1: that they've always been affiliated with. Then they start to
Speaker 1: become rabidly pro Trump or pro La La. I've seen
Speaker 1: it personally with friends and things like that, people going
Speaker 1: from Trump's a murderer. Trump needs to be in jail.
Speaker 1: I'll never vote for that guy to Trump twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four on Facebook. Right. See this kind of stuff all
Speaker 1: the time, is like, Wow, I need to get some
Speaker 1: spine and a backbone to go along with some critical
Speaker 1: thinking here. But when we look at the vice presidential
Speaker 1: debate that's going to start October first, and there'll be already,
Speaker 1: you know, a half dozen states where the vote, well,
Speaker 1: voting will already have started. Pennsylvania, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: starts September sixteenth, so it's next Monday, not even a
Speaker 1: week from now, they will start voting in Pennsylvania. So
Speaker 1: we're getting quite close, thankfully, and we don't have to
Speaker 1: put up with us maybe too much longer. Of course,
Speaker 1: it'll never stop. The politics will never stop. Lala Harris
Speaker 1: is now secluded a hotel with a Trump impersonator. Strange Bedfellows,
Speaker 1: isn't it. H Harris's campaign as she's that major career
Speaker 1: at strange bedfellows. Harris's campaign has got her in a
Speaker 1: hotel and on a fake stage with a Trump impersonator.
Speaker 1: Now that's something that I would pay to see. I
Speaker 1: would like to see her debating somebody from Saturday Night Life,
Speaker 1: for example. At least have some humor in it. They've
Speaker 1: got the lights, they've got it set up like it's
Speaker 1: a studio, they got the stage that even brought in
Speaker 1: somebody who's dressed and acting like the former president. Something
Speaker 1: said he had an orange wig, and it's like, no,
Speaker 1: his wig is not orange, his skin is orange. So
Speaker 1: and they're drawing Harris so that she can function without
Speaker 1: cheating notes. And she's not going to have her her
Speaker 1: her security animal with her Tim Waltz. She's got to
Speaker 1: do this solo. I mean, this is you know, this
Speaker 1: is really going to be difficult for her, something she
Speaker 1: hasn't done since becoming the nominee. And she hasn't done
Speaker 1: a single interview, not a press conference. Well she did
Speaker 1: have one interview, but she took along her comfort animal
Speaker 1: with her Tim Walls and without being able to go
Speaker 1: Trump into sound bite traps because the muted microphones ruled
Speaker 1: that Harris campaign failed to get changed. The polls are
Speaker 1: once again showing Trump leading Harris in the crucial states.
Speaker 1: That's right, Where is the thing? What? Yeah, let's talk
Speaker 1: about the horse race. Nate Silver, he's switching. So Nate
Speaker 1: Silver at five thirty eight has now changed horse This
Speaker 1: is again in midstream. You know, it's just a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks ago that he was saying and this is
Speaker 1: absolutely la la Harris all the way, and now he switched.
Speaker 1: And it's kind of interesting when you look at this.
Speaker 1: This is the data here, I can see why he switched.
Speaker 1: This is what they're talking about in terms of his probability.
Speaker 1: And what Nate Silver does is he doesn't look at
Speaker 1: the opinion polls, and that kind of gives you an
Speaker 1: insight into maybe the popular vote. That's not the way
Speaker 1: we elect presidents. It's state by state, and so he
Speaker 1: looks at it state by state. And so there's a
Speaker 1: lot of states that are just you know, in the
Speaker 1: tank for one candidate or the other, and then there's
Speaker 1: the so called battleground states that possibly could move from
Speaker 1: one to the other. And so when you look at this,
Speaker 1: the blue line, of course is Harris and the red
Speaker 1: line is Trump. They have switched the colors so that
Speaker 1: we embrace communism. Wouldn't want to have the Marxist commie
Speaker 1: Democrats as read. That would be a little bit too
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, I think I know what's going on here,
Speaker 1: So we become the red team. And so when you
Speaker 1: look at this, you know, there's a bell shaped curve
Speaker 1: for Harris, and Trump has flattened her curve at this
Speaker 1: point in time, and then he is an inverted bell
Speaker 1: shaped curve. So he was quite a bit above her,
Speaker 1: then she got above him, and now she's quite a
Speaker 1: bit below him. And so when you look at it,
Speaker 1: he breaks it down. He says, here's the electoral college
Speaker 1: probability sixty four to thirty five percent, and he actually
Speaker 1: goes higher in some of the simulations that he does.
Speaker 1: The popular vote shows it going to La La Harris
Speaker 1: fifty five, actually fifty six to forty four, but it
Speaker 1: shows the electoral college at sixty four to thirty five
Speaker 1: percent probability, and saying that Trump could get two hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty one electoral college votes to her two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty six. Was it something like two hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy You need something like that anyway, and the popular
Speaker 1: vote share shows her is forty nine point seven and
Speaker 1: him at forty nine point one. So again, you know,
Speaker 1: you have to take into consideration the state by state thing,
Speaker 1: and so he does that. He looks at the state
Speaker 1: by state, the swing states, the Magnificent seven, I guess
Speaker 1: we could call them. Pennsylvania trumphead sixty four, thirty six,
Speaker 1: Michigan Trump ahead fifty four forty six, Wisconsin trumphead fifty three,
Speaker 1: forty seven, Arizona Trump seventy seven, twenty three, North Carolina
Speaker 1: Trump seventy five to twenty five. We have a do
Speaker 1: we have a winner? Yet? Of course we're weeks away
Speaker 1: and anything could happen, Like tonight, who knows what'll happen.
Speaker 1: And they're not done. They've got some tricks up their sleeve. So,
Speaker 1: as they said before, people pointed out before at this
Speaker 1: point against Trump, Clinton was doing much better than La
Speaker 1: La Harris and Trump was doing much mean, Biden was
Speaker 1: doing much much better than La La Harris is doing.
Speaker 1: So you know, the trend is even to go down
Speaker 1: for her, and then we come into the issues. You know,
Speaker 1: what issues is she going to talk about? You know,
Speaker 1: will Trump really talk about the issues and really talk
Speaker 1: about the fact that she used to be Indian but
Speaker 1: now she's black. Yeah, Harris's campaign dodgees Axios. Axios is
Speaker 1: a very friendly mainstream left stream publication, but she doesn't
Speaker 1: want to do any interviews with anybody. Part of it
Speaker 1: is because she's flip flopping back and forth on really
Speaker 1: key issues. They wanted to ask her questions about the
Speaker 1: EV mandate. She says, I don't support mandating EV's anymore.
Speaker 1: And so then they followed up and they said, well,
Speaker 1: you know, can we even get a comment from the
Speaker 1: people who are really running the campaign. I know she
Speaker 1: doesn't know anything. I know she's not going to do
Speaker 1: an interview with us, but can we get a statement
Speaker 1: from the campaign itself? No? No, They never responded. And
Speaker 1: so when we look at the cars, the cars are
Speaker 1: part of the other big problem that they've got, which
Speaker 1: is the economy and inflation. This was sent to me
Speaker 1: by listener. He s here's an example of bidonomics. Eleven thousand,
Speaker 1: six hundred and sixty four dollars increase in five years.
Speaker 1: He said that he got a twenty nineteen Honda Odyssey
Speaker 1: and he shows the price there and said, I just
Speaker 1: priced it out for a twenty twenty four Honda Odyssey
Speaker 1: and eleven thousand dollars more. It went from thirty five
Speaker 1: thirty thirty yeah, thirty five, thirty six to forty seven
Speaker 1: and change change being six hundred ninety four dollars and
Speaker 1: forty three cents. That's the big issue, right, and that's
Speaker 1: the big issue with EV's as well. And he's not
Speaker 1: even looking at an EV. I mean, if he had
Speaker 1: priced in an EV, here's a here's a Honda, and
Speaker 1: here's a Honda EV. You know that's much much worse
Speaker 1: than that. Harris's campaign won't say whether she supports requiring
Speaker 1: automakers to build only electric or hydrogen vehicles by twenty
Speaker 1: and thirty five, a position she took during her campaign
Speaker 1: when she was running for present four years ago, but
Speaker 1: of course she does. It's all about the green deal,
Speaker 1: the green steal. On August the twenty eighth, Axios asked
Speaker 1: the Harris campaign, not her, but just the campaign people
Speaker 1: who are actually running stuff, to clarify her position whether
Speaker 1: she would sign or be to a bill she co
Speaker 1: sponsored in twenty nineteen. On Tuesday afternoon, Harris's campaign and
Speaker 1: ultimately declined. To comment, no interviews, no press conference, no comments,
Speaker 1: no policy statements. They are running freight okay because they
Speaker 1: are such radical leftists. Will Trump expose that? Or will
Speaker 1: he start getting petty and personal? Four issues la la
Speaker 1: has made changed her position on New York Times pointed
Speaker 1: out that in their poll of the weekend showing that
Speaker 1: Trump was ahead, forty seven percent of respondents viewed Harris
Speaker 1: as quote too liberal or progressive. Forty seven percent say
Speaker 1: she's too liberal or progressive. Only thirty two percent viewed
Speaker 1: Trump as too conservative? How could anybody view him as conservative?
Speaker 1: What is he trying to conserve? No? Anyway? You know,
Speaker 1: when you look at what Dana Bash did with her,
Speaker 1: the only interview that she sat down to do pre recorded,
Speaker 1: not lie. She's got her for animal with her Tim
Speaker 1: Waltz there and since that's not enough, CNN's Dana Bash says, well,
Speaker 1: you know, you've been all over the map with these things.
Speaker 1: You reverse yourself a lot of key issues. What are
Speaker 1: some of the reasons why did you do this? Was
Speaker 1: it because of this? Was it because of that? Was
Speaker 1: it because of this other thing? Actually gave her a
Speaker 1: multiple choice. Here's some excuses that you can give me.
Speaker 1: I'll take any of these excuses. Lala wasn't smart enough
Speaker 1: to do that.
Speaker 5: Speaking, How should voters look at some of the changes
Speaker 5: that you've made, that you've explained some of here in
Speaker 5: your policy. Is it because you have more experience now
Speaker 5: and you've learned more about the information? Is it because
Speaker 5: you were running for president in a Democratic primary? And
Speaker 5: should they feel comfortable and confident that what you're saying
Speaker 5: now is going to be your policy moving forward?
Speaker 6: Dana, I think the most important and most significant aspect
Speaker 6: of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have
Speaker 6: not changed. You mentioned the Green New Deal. I have
Speaker 6: always believed, and I've worked on it, that the climate
Speaker 6: crisis is real, that it is an urgent matter to
Speaker 6: which we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to
Speaker 6: deadlines around time. We did that with the Implacent Reduction Act.
Speaker 6: We have set goals for the United States of America
Speaker 6: and by extension, the globe around when we should meet
Speaker 6: certain standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. As an example, that.
Speaker 1: Value has been isn't that great? See she's in sync
Speaker 1: around the globe. As a matter of fact, you know,
Speaker 1: part of the problem in Italy and Germany and other
Speaker 1: places are complaining, said, you know, we got this twenty
Speaker 1: thirty five deadline. Where'd that come from. It's a global
Speaker 1: conspiracy that she's a part of. She's parroting that global conspiracy,
Speaker 1: just like Trump did with the warp speed and locked
Speaker 1: down all the rest of the stuff. These people walk,
Speaker 1: both of them walk and lockstep with the globalists. That
Speaker 1: both of them are on board with the global agendas.
Speaker 1: Just one of them. You can see it, one of them.
Speaker 1: You can as a matter of fact, that she's doing it.
Speaker 1: She says, well, you know, I've always been about the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal, and so we did the Inflation Reduction Act,
Speaker 1: just like I said earlier. Biden said, well we did
Speaker 1: the Inflation Reduction Act. We should have called it what
Speaker 1: it was, and he was talking about the Green New Deal.
Speaker 1: So both of them talk about the Green New Deal,
Speaker 1: the Green New Steel, and they both of them equate
Speaker 1: it to the so called Inflation Reduction Act, which is
Speaker 1: exactly right. But in all of this, what she's saying
Speaker 1: essentially is well, I'm on board with the global agenda,
Speaker 1: I'm on board with the Green Steel, and I'll say
Speaker 1: and do anything I need to my values haven't changed.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling people different stories right now. Because she
Speaker 1: is a fracking liar. She fracking is one of the
Speaker 1: issues that she's changed on. That's what he should call.
Speaker 1: You are a fracking wire. We must guard against what
Speaker 1: is a clear crisis in terms of the climate. She said,
Speaker 1: Now to do that, what we've accomplished thus far, the
Speaker 1: Inflation Reduction Act, it's going to be, she says, what
Speaker 1: we've done to invest, by my calculation, probably a trillion
Speaker 1: dollars over the next few years. That's why I call
Speaker 1: it the Green Steel. It's a grift, it's a transfer
Speaker 1: of wealth. We've already done trillions of dollars to them.
Speaker 1: We're going to do even more trillions of dollars. The
Speaker 1: guy that they now love to hate, Elon Musk, is
Speaker 1: going to be one of the biggest benefactors of all
Speaker 1: this stuff because he's selling these battery energy storage sites.
Speaker 1: He got on the ground floor with that, pushing that out.
Speaker 1: But you know, it's a big transfer to their friends,
Speaker 1: trillions of dollars, and even to the people that they
Speaker 1: claim to hate. And then we have the border crossings.
Speaker 1: You know, it was interesting in the twenty presidential run.
Speaker 1: I remember calling it when they had the big crew
Speaker 1: of Democrat candidates and they ask them at one point
Speaker 1: in time, do you think we ought to decriminalize the
Speaker 1: border crossings? And they all raise their hand yes, and said, well,
Speaker 1: they just admitted that it's a crime to cross the
Speaker 1: border illegally. They don't want us to call the people
Speaker 1: who are committing crimes crossing the border illegally. They don't
Speaker 1: want us to call them illegal, but they just call
Speaker 1: them illegal. So during a primary debate, she also raised
Speaker 1: her hand to say that healthcare plans should include coverage
Speaker 1: for undocumented migrants. When she says health care for all
Speaker 1: and welfare for all, what she and the Democrats mean
Speaker 1: is for all of the world, because we are the
Speaker 1: only country that can just conjure money out of nowhere
Speaker 1: and never have to pay it back. But the world
Speaker 1: is waking up to that scam and it's going to
Speaker 1: come crashing down. She says, Well, we have laws and
Speaker 1: they have to be followed, and they have to be enforced,
Speaker 1: and they address and deal with people who cross our
Speaker 1: borders illegally, and there should be consequences. She said, so
Speaker 1: were there consequences for the Haitians? For example.
Speaker 6: That is why also, starting with our administration, we gave
Speaker 6: TPS temporary protected status oh TPS migrants fifty five thousand,
Speaker 6: and then more recently we extended temporary protected status to
Speaker 6: over a hundred TPS patient migrants for that very reason
Speaker 6: that they need support, they need protection.
Speaker 1: I always wondered what TPS diod for.
Speaker 7: Yeah, you apparently didn't put one of the new cover.
Speaker 1: Sheets on your GPS reports. Oh yeah, I'm sorry about that.
Speaker 1: I forgot.
Speaker 4: Mm.
Speaker 7: Yeah, you see, we're putting the cover sheets on all
Speaker 7: TPS reports now before they go out.
Speaker 1: Did you see the memo about this? Yeah, that's from Lalla.
Speaker 1: I have the memo right here. I just forgot. But
Speaker 1: it's not chipping out till tomorrow, so there's no problem. Yeah.
Speaker 1: If you could just go ahead and make sure you
Speaker 1: do that from now on, that would be And I'll
Speaker 1: go ahead and make sure you get another copy of
Speaker 1: that memo. Okay, yeah, no, I heard the memo.
Speaker 5: I got it.
Speaker 4: It's right, Phil.
Speaker 1: If you don't fill out that TPS report, how we're
Speaker 1: going to get these Haitians in. I mean, we got
Speaker 1: twenty thousand of them in Smithfield, Ohio. But they're living
Speaker 1: with the Simpsons cheek to jowl, I guess in Smithfield.
Speaker 1: But how we're going to get more of them? Man,
Speaker 1: if you don't fill out your TPS report. I always
Speaker 1: wondered what that was anyway. The electric vehicle mandate. When
Speaker 1: Aris was a Senator, she co sponsored a bill that
Speaker 1: would require automakers to build strictly electric or hydrogen vehicles
Speaker 1: by twenty thirty five. That's exactly the magic number that
Speaker 1: all of the globalist leaders are doing. Wow, it's like
Speaker 1: they got together some meeting or something and set up
Speaker 1: a plan that they didn't tell us about. Wow, it's
Speaker 1: going to require Oh, you mean mandate mandate, you mean
Speaker 1: central planning of the economy? You mean car prohibition? Yeah,
Speaker 1: you see. It isn't that she just doesn't like ice
Speaker 1: ic at the border. She doesn't like ice in your
Speaker 1: car either. The internal combustion engine. No ice. That's that's
Speaker 1: just the does get these selviies. I should have gone
Speaker 1: to the DNC and sold no ice shirts. Now most
Speaker 1: of them would have thought that it was the border,
Speaker 1: but there would have been a few that were a
Speaker 1: little bit more savvy. We're like, yeah, no internal combustion engine.
Speaker 1: I want that as well, and no fuel, no fuel
Speaker 1: for the ice cars because of global warming. You don't
Speaker 1: want to give any money to ice and archive version
Speaker 1: of her campaign. She pledged one carbon neutral electricity on
Speaker 1: all new buses, heavy duty vehicles, vehicle fleets. The page
Speaker 1: also indicated support for requiring one hundred percent of new
Speaker 1: vehicles to be zero emission by twenty thirty five. When
Speaker 1: they talk about zero this and zero that, zero population growth,
Speaker 1: zero emissions, zero carbon, this is the tautalitarian intolerance of
Speaker 1: the central planners. You should give zero tention, zero support
Speaker 1: anybody who says zero anything. That's what these people are
Speaker 1: all about. They're about zero population. That's the fundamental issue.
Speaker 1: And of course there'll be zero fuel for the existing
Speaker 1: cars as well. And then this other article also recounts faying,
Speaker 1: you know, Axios tried the early September week ago. They
Speaker 1: tried to get this her to clarify this, but they
Speaker 1: won't even talk about it. And then that brings us
Speaker 1: to another one of our flip flops. Medicare for all,
Speaker 1: Medicare for all people of Earth, people of Earth. I
Speaker 1: come to serve mankind. The old Twilight zone thing, right,
Speaker 1: I found out it was a cookbook. Yeah, well they
Speaker 1: got a cookbook approach. It's called Cloud and Piven. It's
Speaker 1: a cookbook approach to destroy us, to destroy our economy.
Speaker 1: All everybody gets medicare. All people get medicare. It's all
Speaker 1: going to be paid for by Uncle Sugar, and Uncle
Speaker 1: Sugar is just going to conjure up the credits on
Speaker 1: his computers and everything would just be fine. This is
Speaker 1: also something that has been around for a very long time,
Speaker 1: thirty one years ago.
Speaker 8: So here we are in nineteen ninety three, fifty years
Speaker 8: after the chairman introduced the Chairman's father introduced the first legislation.
Speaker 8: We are still wrestling with many of the same issues
Speaker 8: and the same problems that previous generations have work done.
Speaker 8: The difference is that today our system has many problems
Speaker 8: that have gotten increasingly expensive, and the difficulties of delivering
Speaker 8: health care in a cost effective way is making a
Speaker 8: challenge to the fiscal integrity of the federal and state governments,
Speaker 8: to businesses, to individuals across the country. Now is our
Speaker 8: chance to beat the historical odds and give the American
Speaker 8: people the health security they need.
Speaker 1: You're trying to run this not even so much as
Speaker 1: compassion but as fiscal imperative, I'm going to be fiscally responsible. Well,
Speaker 1: it's mettercare for all people of Earth will be the
Speaker 1: thing that will fiscally take us down the fiscal drain.
Speaker 1: And this whole single payer thing that means as nobody pays,
Speaker 1: single payer means that the government will run all your
Speaker 1: health care workout for you. Under Trump in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: and of course, notice what happened. Trump was the one
Speaker 1: who was there not just locking us down, putting out
Speaker 1: ventilators to kill people and vaccines to kill people, but
Speaker 1: he was also laying down the foundation, you know, laying
Speaker 1: down the initial universal basic income stuff to get people
Speaker 1: accustomed to that, and then setting up all of the
Speaker 1: incentives for the hospitals to kill people based on bribing them.
Speaker 1: They just point at somebody and I'll give you thirteen
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. I'll give you twenty percent bonus on everything
Speaker 1: that you do. Yeah, what kind of a single payer
Speaker 1: is that pay everybody everywhere for everything? No problem at all.
Speaker 1: So again, Nate Silver, who has just reversed this. He
Speaker 1: runs the five thirty eight thing, and it's tied I
Speaker 1: think to the New York Times. Maybe it's an independent.
Speaker 1: He's got his Silver bulletin newsletter that he puts out there.
Speaker 1: Nate Silver does and like I said, before, he goes
Speaker 1: anywhere from his simulations, the one that I showed you earlier,
Speaker 1: the snapshot that was there in terms of the polls,
Speaker 1: that's a sixty five thirty five. But he runs it
Speaker 1: through various scenarios in his simulation again doing a state
Speaker 1: by state thing, and this is the most positive one
Speaker 1: for La La Harris. It goes as much as seventy
Speaker 1: eight twenty two in favor of Trump in his terms
Speaker 1: of his simulations. So he said she had she missed
Speaker 1: the big opportunity. One campaign decision he said cost her
Speaker 1: all of this stuff. What would that be? He says,
Speaker 1: there one big mistake could cost her the election. Well,
Speaker 1: it's putting Tim waltson because it showed that she was
Speaker 1: part of the radical radical radical left five point thirty
Speaker 1: eight founder said that she blew quote blew one big
Speaker 1: opportunity to track to the center with her selection of
Speaker 1: Tim Waltz rather than Josh Shapiro out of Pennsylvania showed
Speaker 1: nearly half of forty seven, nearly half of the people
Speaker 1: the New York Times Paul, but I didn't mentioned before.
Speaker 1: Nearly half forty seven percent think that she's too liberal,
Speaker 1: a reflection of her abortive twenty twenty presidential campaign. Interesting
Speaker 1: choice of words from the New York Post her abortive campaign.
Speaker 1: She aborted her campaign once before. I guess that was
Speaker 1: her choice to make a woman's choice to abort her campaign.
Speaker 1: You know, back in the early days of Russian Vah,
Speaker 1: he used to do call abortions, I don't like what
Speaker 1: you're saying, make this noise and hang up on people.
Speaker 1: People thought that was too edgy, and Rush pulled it back.
Speaker 1: He became a lap dog of the Republican Party after
Speaker 1: he went to you know, he was pretty critical of
Speaker 1: George H. W. Bush had him when he reversed himself
Speaker 1: and read my lips, no new taxes, and he did
Speaker 1: the biggest tax increase we'd ever had at that point
Speaker 1: in time. He had a commercial where he audio commercial
Speaker 1: where George H. W. Bush is heard running up to
Speaker 1: the top of the White House and looking at the
Speaker 1: weather vein to see which way the wind is blowing
Speaker 1: and then raising taxes. So it was very damaging and
Speaker 1: George H. W. Bush invited him to the White House
Speaker 1: met him and carried his bags so he could sleep
Speaker 1: in the Lincoln bedroom. And you know, they just did
Speaker 1: like some kind of a brain transfer or something with him.
Speaker 1: At that point in time, he was owned by them.
Speaker 1: And I've seen it happen to the guy that I
Speaker 1: used to work for as well. So it's what it
Speaker 1: be too harsh for us to talk about campaign abortions.
Speaker 1: Should we do a campaign abortion they stick people? Should
Speaker 1: we say that her campaign should just be torn apart
Speaker 1: limb by limb? Oh, you can't say that. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's the reality for what they do to babies, but
Speaker 1: you can't talk about that in a metaphorical sense even. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's just too harsh, too harsh. Well, Trump said, saving
Speaker 1: babies at six months, six weeks, it's too harsh. Her
Speaker 1: campaign that year was run by in twenty nineteen by
Speaker 1: people who seemingly thought that Elizabeth Warren was a right winger,
Speaker 1: wrote Nate's silver I think Walts was a decent enough
Speaker 1: pick on his own mares because Nate is a lefty Democrat,
Speaker 1: soh yeah, I don't know. He doesn't have any problem
Speaker 1: with her, But it's just a you just flew your flag.
Speaker 1: Everybody sees where you're coming from. Now they see that
Speaker 1: you're waltzing with the radical left. So but he does
Speaker 1: make a good support dog. He saw that. When he's
Speaker 1: doing an interview, he's sitting there and he's nodding his head. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: I agree with her whatever she says. Whenever she is
Speaker 1: forced to do an interview, in her one and only interview,
Speaker 1: he's there as a very good little support animal. So
Speaker 1: I guess you know, she got what she wanted from him.
Speaker 1: So what is her next move? You know, the polls
Speaker 1: have gone too, She's gone down like this, and Trump
Speaker 1: has gone down and then back up again. So now
Speaker 1: what do they do? Well, I think the obvious next
Speaker 1: move is for her to become president before the election. Right,
Speaker 1: That's going to be about the only thing she can
Speaker 1: do in this game to keep the momentum. And look, understand,
Speaker 1: they picked these people knowing that whoever of these two win,
Speaker 1: they'll be their lap dogs. And they just have them.
Speaker 1: They have them compete against each other. It's the same
Speaker 1: thing that DARPA and the intelligence community did with the
Speaker 1: internet companies and social media companies that they funded in
Speaker 1: a late nineties when the switching circuitry started, you know,
Speaker 1: giving people the bandwidth that they needed. They poured a
Speaker 1: lot of money into several different companies and then they
Speaker 1: let them compete. And that's what they're doing with the politicians,
Speaker 1: because either one of these people will do whatever the
Speaker 1: globeless want, whatever they so called deep state, the intelligence community,
Speaker 1: the military industrial complex, big business, big pharma, their lap
Speaker 1: dogs for all of those interests. But what does she
Speaker 1: do in terms of competition. Well, the thing that she
Speaker 1: can do to take the narrative back is become president.
Speaker 1: I think that will be the October surprise. They'll wait
Speaker 1: closer to the end of the election because as you
Speaker 1: saw with this, you know, you do something, you do
Speaker 1: the well, okay, now we're going to anoint her as
Speaker 1: the presidential candidate, and everybody gets to celebrate that and everything.
Speaker 1: So she gets a big bump. She'll get a big
Speaker 1: bump when they make her present and she'll they'll do
Speaker 1: that just before the election. Cash but El, who former
Speaker 1: Department of Defense Chief of Staff and deputy Director of
Speaker 1: National Intelligence under Trump. Cash Betel thinks that as well.
Speaker 1: He shared his belief that Biden might step down and
Speaker 1: hand the reins the presidency to his vice president and
Speaker 1: a carefully orchestrated political move designed to shield his embattled family.
Speaker 1: And this was very clear as well last week. Very
Speaker 1: strange turn of events, I guess. And if he didn't
Speaker 1: pay any attention, it's like, well, look at this we
Speaker 1: had Hunter Biden wanted to skip the trial and he
Speaker 1: just admits guilt, just going to throw himself on the
Speaker 1: mercy of the court. Or maybe he knows that there's
Speaker 1: already a deal in place where Biden can step down
Speaker 1: and he can get a pardon from La La Harris,
Speaker 1: he and all of his family. Just look at the people.
Speaker 1: But Trump pardoned, did he pardoned julian A SiGe, No, Snowden, No,
Speaker 1: Ross Olbrick. No, he's saying he's going to pardon Ross Olbrick. Now, well,
Speaker 1: why didn't you do it? Then? You had so many
Speaker 1: people writing you asking you to do it. Ross's mom
Speaker 1: very involved in all of that. Didn't do any of
Speaker 1: that stuff. Marty Gottisfeld.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 1: Now, all these people who were political prisoners, who were
Speaker 1: unjustly convicted, given extreme thing, and of course the biggest
Speaker 1: of all refused to pardon the January the sixthers who
Speaker 1: he had misled used fleeced and he and Alex you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just amazing to me. So anyway, I
Speaker 1: think no, Remember, the Biden family will ever go to prison,
Speaker 1: said cash matel The tax trial that Biden Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: is now undergoing is total sham and a fraud. Of course,
Speaker 1: he admitted that he is guilty. Just let's not air
Speaker 1: that dirty laundry. Let's just go ahead and do that,
Speaker 1: and we'll take care of it with a pardon. He
Speaker 1: should have been charged with multiple serious felons years ago,
Speaker 1: but not going to mention the fact he's already a
Speaker 1: convicted felon. But Daddy's going to save him. He's never
Speaker 1: going to go to jail. There'll be a horse trade.
Speaker 1: Biden will leave or retire, and then you, la la
Speaker 1: are going to take the reins and once the election
Speaker 1: is over, you're going to pardon my son, my entire family,
Speaker 1: and myself. Because remember here's the king. Okay, this is
Speaker 1: cash Battel, and he was Trump's for Department of Defense
Speaker 1: chief of Staff, and he was deputy Director of the
Speaker 1: National Intelligence under Trump. He's part of the inner circle.
Speaker 1: He knows it. They all know it, just like Trump
Speaker 1: knew that he lost. Just finally admitted that they lost
Speaker 1: my whisker. But you know, I talked to Ken Block,
Speaker 1: who was hired to do the election stuff. He says, Yeah,
Speaker 1: they all knew that they lost. They just kept it going,
Speaker 1: lured the January, the six people in, and then left
Speaker 1: them twisting in the wind. I've said that all along,
Speaker 1: and I've given historical precedents about that. Gerald for pardoning
Speaker 1: Nixon before he was charged with anything, said well, I
Speaker 1: pardon him for doing this, this, and this, and so
Speaker 1: if you charge him, you can't do any you know,
Speaker 1: you can't can't charge him. These already been pardoned. And
Speaker 1: prior to that, the original Insurrection Act Andrew Johnson who
Speaker 1: took over from Abraham Lincoln when Lincoln was shot, and
Speaker 1: they put the Insurrection Act together to come after Confederates,
Speaker 1: and he pardoned them all. And so you don't have
Speaker 1: to wait until somebody is charged. And that's what cash
Speaker 1: Betel says. You know, people inside the Trump administration knew
Speaker 1: this as well. They weren't ignorant of history or the law,
Speaker 1: he says, because remember, presidential pardons aren't just retroactive their perspective.
Speaker 1: So if you pardon someone, you pardon them for the
Speaker 1: entirety of the conduct that you include in the pardon paperwork,
Speaker 1: from here to infinity and beyond. So Trump guy, Trump's
Speaker 1: guy knew this. Everybody knew it. They knew this about
Speaker 1: the January the sixth people. So why didn't Trump pardon them?
Speaker 1: Because he's not standing between you and the evil Democrats.
Speaker 1: You're standing between him and the evil Democrats. He will
Speaker 1: throw his supporters under the bus. This whole thing was
Speaker 1: orchestrated from the beginning, with people like Roger Stone and
Speaker 1: Alex Jones, and I called it from the very beginning.
Speaker 1: And I'm proud to say that I stood up to
Speaker 1: him at his network and that's why he fired me.
Speaker 1: He didn't fire me because he's out of money. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: he hasn't me this stuff. It wasn't paying me that
Speaker 1: much to bankrupt him. But yeah, he fired me because
Speaker 1: I posed him on this stuff. I'd do it again,
Speaker 1: and I continue to do it. And whenever I do it,
Speaker 1: I'm called a disgruntled former employee. I was disgruntled when
Speaker 1: I was there as an employee. I posed him when
Speaker 1: I was there. He threw these people to the Democrat wolves.
Speaker 1: He and Trump Trump could apart, and of course nothing
Speaker 1: ever happened to the two of them really, so RFK Junior,
Speaker 1: So the Republicans have become the Party of the common Man?
Speaker 1: Well have they?
Speaker 2: Have they?
Speaker 1: Really? Or have the Republicans become the Democrats so much
Speaker 1: so that R. F. K. Junior is comfortable with them
Speaker 1: and the Democrats have become the Marxists. That's my perspective.
Speaker 1: It has always been my perspective. And as I said before,
Speaker 1: he is now going to remain on the ballot in Michigan.
Speaker 1: But I don't think that's going to make any difference. Frankly,
Speaker 1: I like I said before, people are going to fall
Speaker 1: back into this tribalism. And so we have a reporter
Speaker 1: calling Laala Harris out for her fake supporters at a rally.
Speaker 1: Well behind me, hundreds of CBS reporter are.
Speaker 7: Leaving and boarding shuttle buses.
Speaker 8: This was a departure for Kamala Harris leaving toss up
Speaker 8: States to come to him.
Speaker 1: Look at that all of these buses, you know, they
Speaker 1: could at least have hired them from different companies, so
Speaker 1: obvious that they're all part of this thing. She had
Speaker 1: a dozen buses there in New Hampshire. She did this.
Speaker 1: I think this is in Savannah. She had to bust
Speaker 1: people from up to four hours away to get them
Speaker 1: to a rally in Savannah, Georgia. One man said he
Speaker 1: was busted in from Atlanta, about a three and a
Speaker 1: half to four hour drive away from Savannah, Georgia. Everything
Speaker 1: about the Harris campaign is staged, managed and fake. But
Speaker 1: she does love buses, doesn't she, especially those yellow buses,
Speaker 1: And I imagine that fixation could be her downfall. It
Speaker 1: kind of showed just how fake this whole thing is
Speaker 1: that any attention to it, they realize the whole thing
Speaker 1: is fake. Well, we're going to take a break. I've
Speaker 1: been going on for about an hour, so I'm going
Speaker 1: to take a break here and we'll do a short commercial.
Speaker 1: We'll actually talk about the common Man. I'll give you
Speaker 1: my idea about what I think the common Man is about.
Speaker 1: It's about and you know, if you are familiar with
Speaker 1: the music, this is kind of a throwback to Fanfare
Speaker 1: for the Common Man by Aaron Colpan, done about the
Speaker 1: middle of the twentieth century, and of course Emerson, Lake
Speaker 1: and Palmer did a version of it. I started out
Speaker 1: I was going to do a cover of Emerson, Lake
Speaker 1: and Palmer's adaptation of a common Man. I wound up
Speaker 1: doing something else and I thought, well, let me make
Speaker 1: that into a commercial. So yeah, this is my opinion
Speaker 1: of what's going on with the common man. It's not
Speaker 1: Republicans and Democrats are nothing, have nothing to do with
Speaker 1: the interest of the common man. They are weaponized against
Speaker 1: the common man. The common man. They created common Core
Speaker 1: and dumbed down our children. They created Common Past to
Speaker 1: track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure
Speaker 1: the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see
Speaker 1: the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of
Speaker 1: us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 1: That is what we have in common. That is what
Speaker 1: they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 1: They desire to know everything about us while they hide
Speaker 1: everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
Speaker 1: expose what they want to. Please share the information and
Speaker 1: links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you
Speaker 1: for listening, thank you for sharing. If you can't support
Speaker 1: us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot
Speaker 1: com and we really do thank you for your support.
Speaker 1: Thank you Eric for the tip on Rockfan. I really
Speaker 1: do appreciate that. That's what it is, your voluntary contributions
Speaker 1: that fund this program. We have some people who support it,
Speaker 1: some things that we recommend, but it is really your
Speaker 1: voluntary contributions that are the bulk of our support here.
Speaker 1: And so please, like the stream, please help people to
Speaker 1: find this. It is difficult forbidden information for you to have.
Speaker 1: Not part of the club, not part of the tribes.
Speaker 1: I don't belong to either one of the tribes. As
Speaker 1: Jeralds lent To used to say, he's a political atheist. Well,
Speaker 1: I guess I am a political atheist when it comes
Speaker 1: to politics. I don't worship either of these parties, and
Speaker 1: I try to call them out for the idolatry and
Speaker 1: that is there, and to tell you that your life
Speaker 1: is really determined by your relationship with God and then
Speaker 1: after that your relationship with your family, with your neighbor,
Speaker 1: love God with all your heart and your neighbors, yourself,
Speaker 1: start to fix your society from the ground up. It's
Speaker 1: the only thing that's going to work. And all this
Speaker 1: stuff from the top down solution, it's just the biggest distraction,
Speaker 1: the biggest misdirection, the biggest red herring of all are
Speaker 1: these presidential elections. So you can find us Rock on Roku,
Speaker 1: on Rockfinn as well, but also on Roku. If you
Speaker 1: want to watch the program on TV, you can also
Speaker 1: search Forard on Roku. You can find it on Roku
Speaker 1: with a search engine still, so if you find it there,
Speaker 1: please rate that five stars. Give us a little bit
Speaker 1: more visibility there. Please, wherever you're watching the show, whether
Speaker 1: it's live or recorded, whether it's video or audio, please
Speaker 1: like the show. That really does help us, and it's
Speaker 1: something that only takes a second to do. Very important.
Speaker 1: So you'll find all the links to the show at
Speaker 1: the Davidnightshow dot com, as well as places where you
Speaker 1: can go to support us if you'd like to. We
Speaker 1: have cash app, We have subscribe Star, very important, Subscribe
Speaker 1: Star and a lot of different tiers that people can
Speaker 1: get into there at subscribe Star. That gives us a
Speaker 1: regular base of support. Zell if your bank supports it,
Speaker 1: that is something that happens right away and there's absolutely
Speaker 1: for now there's no fee at all on Zeal. We
Speaker 1: have a PO box if you would like to send
Speaker 1: a contribution that way. There's no fee on that either.
Speaker 1: But we do have several different places where you can
Speaker 1: support us. Cash app is another one of those, and
Speaker 1: we've gotten the program of the problems ironed out now
Speaker 1: with cash app, so it seems to be working fine.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: I went through. I don't know what happened, maybe they
Speaker 1: updated it or something, but it was really kind of
Speaker 1: weird and funky for a couple of weeks joined strange stuff,
Speaker 1: and it's still occasionally is kind of strange for me
Speaker 1: to try to like when somebody sends a cash app
Speaker 1: thing about the only thing I can do is to
Speaker 1: hit a hard thing to acknowledge it. I try to
Speaker 1: do that, but it still gives me some issues with
Speaker 1: that sometimes. But it is working as far as the
Speaker 1: money goes, and so we really do appreciate your support.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about electric vehicles, because La
Speaker 1: La is talking about that. We now have an environmental
Speaker 1: the chairman of the Environment Agency. That is something in
Speaker 1: the UK. Is it government, is it? NGO? Doesn't really
Speaker 1: matter because they're all merged together on these things. His
Speaker 1: idea that electric vehicles are going to be banned for
Speaker 1: rivers is not based on the fact that they're going
Speaker 1: to crash through bridges like that Ford lightning that weighed
Speaker 1: nine pounds empty just went through a historical bridge that's
Speaker 1: been around for over a century. It went through the
Speaker 1: bridge vertically, not horizontally, and wound up in the river.
Speaker 1: Fortunately there was nobody canoeing or rafting underneath at the
Speaker 1: time because it is a very popular area for that,
Speaker 1: and fortunately the driver was able to get out. I
Speaker 1: don't know how he was able to get out, since
Speaker 1: you know, that's one of the key things that used
Speaker 1: to be an obsession with people in Europe that they
Speaker 1: would get trapped into their cars, and that's especially an
Speaker 1: issue with the electric cars, I would think, because all
Speaker 1: the windows now are power windows, and you get into
Speaker 1: the water and you lose your power like that, you
Speaker 1: can't get out of the car. It's hard to get out.
Speaker 1: So a lot of times the people in Europe will
Speaker 1: have a device that they can smack the window with
Speaker 1: and you know, it's a pointed device to shatter it
Speaker 1: so they can kick their way out, not be trapped
Speaker 1: in the car and dround. So the guy somehow he
Speaker 1: got out, I don't know, but glad that he got out.
Speaker 1: But what they're saying is not that we're going to
Speaker 1: have massively heavy trucks and things like that crashing through
Speaker 1: bridges into the water. It's not going to plute it
Speaker 1: that way. They're saying that the electric vehicles use because
Speaker 1: they're so heavy, they use up their tires much faster,
Speaker 1: they use up their brakes much faster, and so we're
Speaker 1: gonna have all this tire dust and break dust that's
Speaker 1: out there. I guess they're not too worried about all
Speaker 1: the electric car smoke when they catch fire, but yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have all this dust, and it's going to
Speaker 1: wash off the roads into the rivers, and there's going
Speaker 1: to be even more pollution because they use these expendables
Speaker 1: up at a much faster rate. But look, if you
Speaker 1: start talking about this kind of stuff, just understand that
Speaker 1: they don't want everybody to have an electric car or
Speaker 1: electric truck. They don't want anybody to have a car
Speaker 1: or truck of any kind. All of this has been
Speaker 1: designed from the very beginning to have zero private transportation.
Speaker 1: That's what they want, a zero out. They don't want
Speaker 1: anybody to have a car or truck of any kind.
Speaker 1: They want to completely control transportation. And this has been
Speaker 1: very obvious to anybody who follows this going back for decades.
Speaker 1: I remember in Raleigh going to a student student council,
Speaker 1: that's what it's like, town council meeting, city council meeting,
Speaker 1: and they had some Marxist Democrat who had just come
Speaker 1: back from Russia, this is before Russia fell in nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty nine, bragging about how she just came back from
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union. She was able to go anywhere she
Speaker 1: wanted to in Moscow and it only cost her a
Speaker 1: nickel to ride the subway. And I said, well, it
Speaker 1: cost you everything. That costs the Russian people everything, not
Speaker 1: just a nickel, cost them their freedom to move and
Speaker 1: go where they want to go. That's the true cost
Speaker 1: of that kind of public transportation. Well, what she was
Speaker 1: trying to do was to build up a consensus for
Speaker 1: one of these monorail boondoggles, and Little Raleigh just ridiculous
Speaker 1: what these people about. But it was always about making
Speaker 1: you know, I'm going to offer you free stuff in
Speaker 1: a way that makes you dependent on the government. And
Speaker 1: the Democrats and the Republicans, many of them at every level.
Speaker 1: Everything they do, whether it's at local government or whether
Speaker 1: it's a federal government. Everything is designed to make you
Speaker 1: dependent on the government, and they do it with free stuff.
Speaker 1: That's why the stimulus checks were so reprehensible, because that
Speaker 1: was a precursor. It was conditioning for universal basic income.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, don't you want some free cash. Here's some
Speaker 1: free cash from the government. Well, from the government, I'm
Speaker 1: here to help you. Italy has called on the EU
Speaker 1: to pause the gas gasoline car ban, the internal combustion
Speaker 1: engine ban, or to risk the collapse of the automobile
Speaker 1: industry in Italy. Well, they know that collapse is their
Speaker 1: desired outcome. They want to take us back into a
Speaker 1: feudal society. For those of us that survive for the
Speaker 1: most part, they want to go to zero population. European
Speaker 1: Union's twenty thirty five petrol car ban. Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: what an amazing coincidence that just happens to be the
Speaker 1: date that La La has chosen as a presidential candidate
Speaker 1: back in twenty nineteen. Let's get rid of all the
Speaker 1: internal combustion engines by twenty thirty five. The European Union
Speaker 1: wants to do that as well. The UN wants to
Speaker 1: do it as well. The Builderberg Group wants to do
Speaker 1: it the Davos Economic World Economic Forum, all the same agenda.
Speaker 4: How could that be.
Speaker 1: It's not a conspiracy. We can rule that out right
Speaker 1: from the beginning. Nobody is engaged. None of our leaders
Speaker 1: are engaged in a conspiracy. Only you, the little people
Speaker 1: through conspiracies. You're conspiracy theorist. And if you commit a crime,
Speaker 1: we're going to charge you with the crime, and with
Speaker 1: a conspiracy to commit that crime. You're the conspiracy theorist,
Speaker 1: not our leaders. Our leaders would never conspire with each
Speaker 1: other to come up with exactly the same date and
Speaker 1: to do exactly the same thing at the same time
Speaker 1: as Trump and Biden did throughout this whole charade of
Speaker 1: the pandemic. No, they would never do that. So there's
Speaker 1: been a growing unease across the continent about a slowdown
Speaker 1: and demand for electric vehicles. There's also how they're going
Speaker 1: to get us to buy these things at really inflated prices.
Speaker 1: By the way, there are also concerns of the Europe's
Speaker 1: car industry is falling increasingly behind manufacturers in China and
Speaker 1: even the US. Why it's the energy stupid, It's the
Speaker 1: price of energy stupid. They can't compete with China because
Speaker 1: China has been given an advantage with a Paris Climate
Speaker 1: Accord that they will always have far, far cheaper energy.
Speaker 1: They can't. They can't manufacture cars, they can't manufacture steel.
Speaker 1: They're closing all those factories down. Last week, car giant
Speaker 1: Volkswagen warned that it might close the factories in Germany
Speaker 1: for the first time ever, owing to issuy issues such
Speaker 1: as high energy prices. Well, that's no longer a theory,
Speaker 1: it is now a definite announcement. Yesterday, one person says
Speaker 1: Europe needs a pragmatic vision. It needs it. It's ideological
Speaker 1: vision has failed. You know, that vision thing that George H. W.
Speaker 1: Bush always talked about. Now they don't need a pragmatic vision.
Speaker 1: They don't need an ideological vision. They need a theological vision.
Speaker 1: You know, quite frankly, when I talk about the great
Speaker 1: replacement that's happening, the deliberate chaos and takedown our societies,
Speaker 1: that's happening everywhere where. They're talking about France or Germany,
Speaker 1: or Italy or the UK or the United States. These
Speaker 1: are really the leaders that God has put in place.
Speaker 1: At one point. You have just reading the other day
Speaker 1: when Solomon reached out to hire him to get supplies
Speaker 1: and workers and designers and artists and everything to build
Speaker 1: the temple as palace and everything. You respondents said, God
Speaker 1: must really love your people to give them a leader
Speaker 1: like you. Can you say that about Trump or La
Speaker 1: La or fill in the blank, any of them? Can
Speaker 1: you say that about any of the foreign leaders out there?
Speaker 1: He says about Macron or Trudeau, God must really love
Speaker 1: candadate to give them a leader like Trudeau. That's just
Speaker 1: dripping with sarcasm, isn't it. No people like Trudeau, Trump, Laala, Harris, Macron,
Speaker 1: all of these, Maloney, Maloney, Kier, Starmer, all of them, Dictator,
Speaker 1: Dan Gladys Bard, Jicklin. God doesn't love the West. These
Speaker 1: people are a judgment of us. We're not looking at
Speaker 1: the great replacement. We're looking at a great judgment of
Speaker 1: Western civilization that's going on here. God does judge nations
Speaker 1: and countries, and you know, as well as the individuals
Speaker 1: in him. That's why we are to pray for the
Speaker 1: peace of the country that we live in and work
Speaker 1: for that to happen, especially to pray for it because
Speaker 1: you know we're going to go through this bad time
Speaker 1: as well. We have our relationship with God, but it
Speaker 1: could be, you know, be difficult for us. Perhaps, so
Speaker 1: we could be better in terms of salt and light
Speaker 1: to make sure that doesn't happen. Maybe we could start
Speaker 1: having some of the people who are professing Christians actually
Speaker 1: pick up the Bible and read it instead of having
Speaker 1: HP lovecraft, sci fi horror conventions and ancient church buildings
Speaker 1: as they are doing up in the Northeast. Anyway, back
Speaker 1: to Volkswagen, the People's car, Volkswagen announced plans to shut
Speaker 1: down factories. It is a bellweather for the economy, says
Speaker 1: Deutsche Feldt right, and a letter to employees on Monday,
Speaker 1: bw's brand chief describe a situation as quote intense, extremely
Speaker 1: tense and beyond the scope of simple cost cutting measures.
Speaker 1: So Germany has fallen behind in terms of competitiveness the
Speaker 1: ten car brands that are part of the VW group,
Speaker 1: and understand that it is a big conglomeration company, just
Speaker 1: like General Motors. Over the years they've gone out and
Speaker 1: bought all these different car brands, even things like I
Speaker 1: think it's Bugatti, and you know a lot of extreme
Speaker 1: brands like that, you know, not just Doudy and the
Speaker 1: German brands and stuff. But it's really big, and so
Speaker 1: they've got ten different car brands that they brought in.
Speaker 1: You're probably going to see a lot of those disappear.
Speaker 1: They must be comprehensively restructured. Plant closures are no longer excluded,
Speaker 1: he said. VW fields compelled to terminate the employment protection
Speaker 1: agreement that's been in place since nineteen ninety four, thirty years.
Speaker 1: Here's the news there line pressnews dot com. To make
Speaker 1: matters worse for the six hundred and eighty thousand VW
Speaker 1: employees worldwide. Management it also feels forced to end its
Speaker 1: job security program, which has been in place since nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety four and prevents job cuts until twenty twenty nine.
Speaker 1: So it's going to be a big fight between the
Speaker 1: unions and the management. Probably because they had a deal
Speaker 1: they weren't going to fire anybody till twenty twenty nine,
Speaker 1: five years early. They got to do it. If such
Speaker 1: an industrial heavyweight has to close factories, it may be
Speaker 1: long overdue wake up call that Germany's economic policy measures
Speaker 1: need to be stepped up considerably, said one person. Another
Speaker 1: at a metal company in Germany. IG Metal said the
Speaker 1: decision quote shakes the foundation of Volkswagen, which is Germany's
Speaker 1: largest industrial employer in Europe's top car maker. Isn't interesting
Speaker 1: that they said twenty twenty nine back in nineteen ninety four.
Speaker 1: Could just be a coincidence, or it could be that
Speaker 1: the big corporations are in on this war against all
Speaker 1: of us. Well, we'll have to negotiate it in twenty
Speaker 1: thirty because by that time we'll have robots and we'll
Speaker 1: have all the rest of this stuff that's going to
Speaker 1: be there. So how is this going to be stopped? Well,
Speaker 1: you never know. You never know. God could stop any
Speaker 1: of this stuff at any point that he wants to.
Speaker 1: It really kind of depends on each and every one
Speaker 1: of us in our relationship to God. And if there's
Speaker 1: enough of us here, there'll be something that changes, I think.
Speaker 1: But you know that it's not going to be coming
Speaker 1: from the Uniparty. The UNI Party is part of the
Speaker 1: United Nations because they do everything that all these people
Speaker 1: want to do. We have a single Texas billionaire though
Speaker 1: it's about to force Greenpeace into bankruptcy with a lawsuit,
Speaker 1: Like you come after me, try to put me out
Speaker 1: of business. Well I'm going to come back at you.
Speaker 1: We have to have that spirit to oppose these injustices
Speaker 1: and to come back at them with the same thing
Speaker 1: that they're throwing at us. And so I applaud him
Speaker 1: for doing that. I hope he wins. But it could
Speaker 1: potentially bankrupt Greenpeace. But guess what, You're not going to
Speaker 1: bankrupt the US government, but they may do it to themselves.
Speaker 1: They're going down that path very very quickly. And by
Speaker 1: the way, you want to get outside of that system
Speaker 1: as much as possible, go to David Knight dot Gold.
Speaker 1: I'll take it to Tony Ardoban's wise wolf Gold. You
Speaker 1: can start to gradually accumulate gold or silver as part
Speaker 1: of Wolfpack. You get the discounts of being part of
Speaker 1: a big buying group that Tony's put together. He's now
Speaker 1: got well over a thousand people and I don't know
Speaker 1: if he's eleven d twelve hundred something that continues to
Speaker 1: grow and you just determine how much you want to
Speaker 1: spend each month, and he puts that together. He gets
Speaker 1: a quantity discount, or you can go buy gold and
Speaker 1: silver directly from him. You can help you to set
Speaker 1: up a gold or silver ira. All of that at
Speaker 1: Wisewolf Gold. I've known Tony for a very long time.
Speaker 1: He's been a supporter of this program. Really do appreciate
Speaker 1: what he has done for us at David Knight dot Gold.
Speaker 1: Let him know that you're coming from here and on
Speaker 1: Rumble twelve June seventeen seventy six, thank you for the tip.
Speaker 1: He says, ground up in Christ. Absolutely, we're going to
Speaker 1: fix this, not from Washington down. We're going to fix
Speaker 1: it from the ground up, and we're going to fix
Speaker 1: it because we're grounded in Christ. We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight show.
Speaker 1: Well, nothing says cult of death like a film festival
Speaker 1: that worships cannibalism, worships sexual debauchery, worships euthanasia and abortion.
Speaker 1: And I'm talking about the Venice Film Festival, of course,
Speaker 1: they all do that as well, the con Film Festival,
Speaker 1: same type of stuff. These quote unquote big film festivals
Speaker 1: always pick the most disgusting stuff. They've been on a
Speaker 1: cannibalism debauchery type of thing for a couple of years now.
Speaker 1: This year, the top prize goes to a pro euthanasia
Speaker 1: film called The Room next Door, it's portraying euthanasia in
Speaker 1: a positive light because these people are a cult of death.
Speaker 1: Hollywood is wholly weird. Everything about it is weird, isn't
Speaker 1: it interesting? It would make that and project that onto
Speaker 1: other people when you talk about weird. They've got a
Speaker 1: monopoly on weird, don't they. And it is a death cult,
Speaker 1: every kind of death in every way, and even cannibalism.
Speaker 1: You know, when I think of Venice, the thing that
Speaker 1: left an indouble mark on me when I went with
Speaker 1: a group of kids between high school and college band
Speaker 1: and chorus group, we went to Venice. And the thing
Speaker 1: that I've always thought about is the Bridge of Size,
Speaker 1: so named because it was an open covered bridge. No,
Speaker 1: you can't drive an evy across it, or even electric boat,
Speaker 1: but definitely would collapse if you get fitted in there.
Speaker 1: But the Bridge of Size, and so so many things
Speaker 1: that come from Venice that are so dark that the
Speaker 1: corrupt family that ruled it, the star chamber. You know,
Speaker 1: everybody talks about the star chamber. You don't want to
Speaker 1: have a star chamber process. That's why we got due process.
Speaker 1: And I think, well, that's where that came from. Where
Speaker 1: you could be accused tried and convicted and obstens and
Speaker 1: they come pick you up and you know, or if
Speaker 1: you were even in the star chamber court, after they
Speaker 1: pronounced the sentence on you, they would take people out
Speaker 1: of there and walk them across the bridge of size
Speaker 1: and people could hear the moaning and the screaming and
Speaker 1: the crying of the damned as they took them away.
Speaker 1: I tell you, these people in Venice putting these films out,
Speaker 1: they're the damned. They just haven't faced judgment yet they
Speaker 1: don't know it. So this film got an eighteen minute
Speaker 1: standing ovation. One of the longest and recent memories about euthanasia,
Speaker 1: put together by a Spanish director who said, I believe
Speaker 1: that saying goodbye to this world cleanly and with dignity
Speaker 1: as a fundamental right of every human being. No, no,
Speaker 1: it isn't God gives life and God takes it away.
Speaker 1: It is a gift from God. God gives and God
Speaker 1: takes away. So it has the actresses that are in it,
Speaker 1: Tilda Swinton Julian Moore. Swinton plays a war correspondent suffering
Speaker 1: from terminal cancer. She asked her old friend played by Moore,
Speaker 1: to be at her side as she takes her own life. Well,
Speaker 1: got cancer, might as well just give up on it. Well, No,
Speaker 1: there's actually things you can do even about cancer. And
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about chemo therapy necessarily.
Speaker 3: We have.
Speaker 1: Chemotherapy. Was a killed my father wasn't cancer chemotherapy, doctors, hospitals.
Speaker 1: John Richardson's going to be joining us at the top
Speaker 1: of the hour. We're going to talk about things that
Speaker 1: you can do even with cancer, things that are natural,
Speaker 1: things that God has provided for us. But of course
Speaker 1: God is the one who heals. We do what we can.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I just want to ask for
Speaker 1: your prayers. We have a lot of things happening in
Speaker 1: our family right now. Travis's son is a couple of
Speaker 1: months away from being born, and so we'd asked for
Speaker 1: your prayers for that, your blessings for that. We'd asked
Speaker 1: for your prayers for his struggles with rheumatoid arthritis. And
Speaker 1: then my other son has been severely injured with just
Speaker 1: the last couple of weeks with a so called antibiotic.
Speaker 1: They've known about this for sixteen years. They've put black
Speaker 1: labels on it three different times, and nobody mentioned any
Speaker 1: of that. It was not on the not given to him,
Speaker 1: the black label warning didn't have any warning about it.
Speaker 1: He was concerned more about the infection that they had
Speaker 1: found and was looking up information about that rather than
Speaker 1: about the drug. I mean, it's just an antibiotic, right well,
Speaker 1: an antibiotic gave my mother a stroke that abilitated her
Speaker 1: through the rest of her life. And the people who
Speaker 1: get the so called phloxens it is something that what
Speaker 1: I read it continues to build and that has been
Speaker 1: his experience so far. So we're asking for your prayers
Speaker 1: to please and thank you so much for the people
Speaker 1: who have sent us things about detox vitamin C. We're
Speaker 1: using those we treat God heals, and so we asked
Speaker 1: for your prayers with that. Getting back to Venice and
Speaker 1: the holy weird people that are there, film director said
Speaker 1: he made the film to communicate his belief that euthanasia
Speaker 1: should be available around the world. He's an activist director.
Speaker 1: His intention is not to entertain people, not to keep
Speaker 1: them interested. It's to push an agenda, of course, an
Speaker 1: agenda of death. And the question is why do you
Speaker 1: need permission to commit suicide? Right? Do we need to
Speaker 1: even have government permission to commit suicide? Of course we don't.
Speaker 1: But when you look at their social agenda, you see
Speaker 1: it all the time with the LGBT stuff. It's not
Speaker 1: enough to tolerate what somebody does. You must celebrate it.
Speaker 1: You see. It's not enough that they could go out
Speaker 1: and commit suicide. But we have to have a society
Speaker 1: and a government that celebrates people committing suicide. That's what
Speaker 1: the Hollywood film is about. That's what this director is about.
Speaker 1: That's what the euthanasia agenda is about. It's about celebrating
Speaker 1: a cult of death. Not just having a cult of death,
Speaker 1: it's about celebrating it. It's important that we have to
Speaker 1: worship these degeneracies that are out there. We got to
Speaker 1: celebrate cannibalism and abortion and euthanasian all the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff. Can't just do. It got to be celebrated.
Speaker 1: It's got to be the thing. Abortion is the thing
Speaker 1: that makes your life if you're a woman. So the
Speaker 1: reason is that society has to applaud all this. We
Speaker 1: have to embrace. This is a spiritual war, and you
Speaker 1: have to do worship to these spirits of cannibalism, euthanasia, abortion, death, degeneracy, debauchery.
Speaker 1: That's what this is about. That's what Hollywood is about.
Speaker 1: Some of the other movies. At one, you have Nicole
Speaker 1: Kidman won Best Actress Award a movie called Baby Girl,
Speaker 1: in which she plays a high powered CEO putting her
Speaker 1: career and her family on the line in order to
Speaker 1: begin an affair with a much younger in turn, Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's honor adultery even to call it an affair. What
Speaker 1: do we call it adultery? Why do we call it
Speaker 1: adult entertainment? Is it because as for adults, No, it's
Speaker 1: because you are adulterating your marriage. You're bringing desecrating, impure
Speaker 1: things into it. And like we're talking about adulterated food
Speaker 1: or adulterated drugs, adultery and adult entertainment or adulterated versions
Speaker 1: of marriage and sex celebrated by Hollywood. Of course, that's
Speaker 1: what they're all about. So career, family, now, that's not
Speaker 1: even your career is as important as following your heart.
Speaker 1: Heart is desperately wicked. Who can know it? That's that's
Speaker 1: a very different view from the Bible than we get
Speaker 1: from Hollywood, isn't it? And then The Quiet Son about
Speaker 1: a family That Best Actor was given in the film
Speaker 1: The Quiet Son, a family that was torn apart by
Speaker 1: what by adultery? Now, celebrate the adultery. That's good. Even
Speaker 1: if it tears a family apart, that's good. But if
Speaker 1: you have somebody in your family that is an extreme
Speaker 1: right wing radical that tears the family part, that's bad.
Speaker 1: That's bad. Adultery is good, the right wing politics is bad.
Speaker 1: Best Director Award goes to the brutalist. This is the
Speaker 1: obligatory annual movie about the Holocaust that is always done
Speaker 1: by Hollywood. They never stop of that. And then we
Speaker 1: have Daniel Queer. Daniel Queer, Daniel Craig as the queer,
Speaker 1: that's the name of the film. Daniel Craig playing a
Speaker 1: gay drug addict. Well, that's what I want to see.
Speaker 1: I mean, when you look at the pictures of him
Speaker 1: as a character.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I can't wait to pay twenty five dollars for
Speaker 3: a ticket to see that.
Speaker 1: Yeah oh yeah, yeah yeah. Drudge is all about how
Speaker 1: oh yeah. I really loved all the homosexual scenes and anything.
Speaker 1: And he's a gay drug addict. He looks like he
Speaker 1: hasn't washed his hair in a decade or so. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just oh, and he really loved that role real
Speaker 1: he got into character. Now what did not get an award? Well,
Speaker 1: people thought that Angelina Joe Lee doing playing Maria Kallis
Speaker 1: in a biolog a biopic talking about the life of
Speaker 1: this famous opera singer. They thought might do pretty well.
Speaker 1: But even with a big name star, it's just too wholesome.
Speaker 1: You know, we I don't know what's that. They probably
Speaker 1: adulterated that story as well, but that did not win anything.
Speaker 1: I mean, they're focused on music and opera. They can't
Speaker 1: do that. So meanwhile, plastic surgeons are now the only
Speaker 1: medical group that has kind of pushed back a little
Speaker 1: bit from harming miners miners. That's what we're talking about miners,
Speaker 1: gas Lighting miners, mutilating miners, sterilizing miners, failed surgeries that
Speaker 1: cause many of these miners to commit suicide because of
Speaker 1: the so called bottom surgery. A medical society says that
Speaker 1: a dearth of evidence gives them pause about treating children.
Speaker 1: They're not saying we're not going to do it, just like, well,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe we want to think about this. The
Speaker 1: tide might be turning. It is not just abuse. This
Speaker 1: is kind of medieval level abuse, and it is pure evil.
Speaker 1: What is being done to kids, plastic surgeon doctor Joss
Speaker 1: Ting and gynecologist surgeon Marcy Bowers performed a transgender procedure
Speaker 1: thatk twice as long as it typically does. They're patient
Speaker 1: a seventeen year old male who had identified as female
Speaker 1: since age five, that is being pushed by his parents. Right,
Speaker 1: no kid at the age of five says I'm in
Speaker 1: the wrong body. Give me a break. Can we just
Speaker 1: call that what it is? A bowl faced lie? This
Speaker 1: is parents ought to be locked up for this. This
Speaker 1: is worse than the Munchausen by proxy. Parents, my kids
Speaker 1: got cancer or whatever, some fatal disease. Don't you feel
Speaker 1: sorry for me? And you know, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: this is even worse than that. And so this is
Speaker 1: a male who said he wanted a vagina. Normally, fully
Speaker 1: developed male sexual organs provide enough skin for plastic surgeon
Speaker 1: to create this artificial vagina. But because the boy had
Speaker 1: been using puberty suppression medication since the age of eleven,
Speaker 1: his sexual organs were very small. There were the size
Speaker 1: and sexual maturity of an eleven year olds. Nevertheless, these
Speaker 1: practitioners performed this mutilation. The next day, the parents felt pain,
Speaker 1: The patient rather felt pain and was rushed back to
Speaker 1: the hospital. As I was getting her on the bed.
Speaker 1: Her on the bed said one of them, I heard
Speaker 1: something go pop. That was the patient's newly created vagina
Speaker 1: tearing apart. This is disgusting, absolutely disgusting. Why they did
Speaker 1: to people who wind up with colostomy bags and all
Speaker 1: the rest of this stuff. It's just mutilation. It is barbaric.
Speaker 1: What is happening. It is perverted that you would do
Speaker 1: something like this. We've always said you got to have
Speaker 1: your parents' permission if you're a minor to get a tattoo. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, tattoos can be removed, but not this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. You can't drink, you can't drive, you can't
Speaker 1: have a guy, and you can't because we understand that
Speaker 1: they don't have the judgment necessary for all of this stuff.
Speaker 1: To be clear, the group has not rejected gender surgeries
Speaker 1: on adolescents, and its statement only applies to plastic surgery procedures,
Speaker 1: not other transgender treatments like the hormone treatments. But what
Speaker 1: they're saying is that they want to step back and
Speaker 1: be cautious about this. Calls for hesitation, calls for skepticism.
Speaker 1: It is in stark contrast the numerous professional medical associations
Speaker 1: that have endorsed, in some cases, championed medical attempts to
Speaker 1: change sex characteristics of miners. The American Medical Association, the
Speaker 1: American Academy of Pediatrics, the Endocrine Society, the American Psychological Association,
Speaker 1: they've all embraced this, and they've called for unobstructed access
Speaker 1: to the interventions for children and adolescents. Why because they're
Speaker 1: profiteering murderers who are out there trying to create lifetime customers,
Speaker 1: even if they only have a brief life before they
Speaker 1: commit suicide.
Speaker 4: Ah.
Speaker 1: But then we've got films showing how tragically wonderful that is.
Speaker 1: Don't we use in Asia? Is great, especially if you
Speaker 1: do it because you got mutilated as a child because
Speaker 1: of this gender gas lighting. And when we look at
Speaker 1: the psychologists, the AMA, corrupt AMA, the American Academy of Pediatricians,
Speaker 1: the Endocrine Society, all these people, from the psychologists down
Speaker 1: to the pediatricians, they are all preying on children physically, psychologically, pharmacologically.
Speaker 1: It's all predatory, and they focus primarily on children. More.
Speaker 1: Plastic surgery is often touted as the last stop on
Speaker 1: a person's gender transition journey. It'll be difficult to justify
Speaker 1: denying it to someone who has already spent years altering
Speaker 1: their bodies using puberty bloggers and cross sex hormones. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and we don't have any politicians we're going to stand
Speaker 1: up to any of this stuff. We don't have any
Speaker 1: politicians who will stand in the gap and defend children.
Speaker 1: A series of attacks on Christians at an apartment complex
Speaker 1: where they are banning the use of the word Bible.
Speaker 1: This is in a senior apartment complex. They decide to
Speaker 1: ban the word Bible in their community room announcements. What
Speaker 1: they do is they have different special interest groups there.
Speaker 4: These are.
Speaker 1: As a senior's apartment complex. So these are people who
Speaker 1: are just kind of in managed living, but they don't
Speaker 1: necessarily have a debilitating medical conditions. They're still able to
Speaker 1: do many things, and so you know, they want to
Speaker 1: pursue their interests. They put the announcements up there. The
Speaker 1: American Center for Law and Justice is announced that just
Speaker 1: sent a demand letter to the complex in North Carolina
Speaker 1: over a decision by managers to violate the religious liberties
Speaker 1: of residents. This is yet another in a series of
Speaker 1: attacks on Christian residents of senior apartment complexes. We continue
Speaker 1: to defend the right of Christian residents to live out
Speaker 1: their faith free from censorship. In this case, officials banned
Speaker 1: our client from advertising his Bible study because the advertisement
Speaker 1: contained the word Bible in it. Our client leads a
Speaker 1: weekly Bible study to fellow residents with fellow residents in
Speaker 1: one of the complex's small conference rooms. Before June, our
Speaker 1: client was able to advertise his Bible study with no
Speaker 1: restrictions at all, without notice or any indication that the
Speaker 1: advertisement violated any sort of policy. The complex removed his
Speaker 1: advertisement and replaced it with spiritual services instead of Bible study.
Speaker 1: Spiritual services is okay, Bible study is not. When our
Speaker 1: client approached an employee of the complex, our client was
Speaker 1: told the managing company does not allow Bible to be
Speaker 1: included in the activities that appear on the calendar. The
Speaker 1: legal team's announcement said, many senior living facilities mistakenly think
Speaker 1: that they must refrain from association with or mention of faith.
Speaker 1: But he said, however, contrary to this belief is the
Speaker 1: law the FHA. The Fair Housing Act prevents these facilities
Speaker 1: from treating religious activities differently. From secular activities. Specifically, the
Speaker 1: Fair Housing Act requires that residents be treated equally without
Speaker 1: regard to their particular religion, even if the apartment complex
Speaker 1: was applying was applying a neutral policy, if it had
Speaker 1: a discriminatory effect on a protected class such as religion,
Speaker 1: Federal courts have recognized that a Fair Housing Act violation
Speaker 1: could still be established. So as that is happening at
Speaker 1: a local apartment complex in North Carolina, what do you
Speaker 1: think the UN is doing? Well, there's a UN agency
Speaker 1: that's now put out some speech rules for people. Don't
Speaker 1: say englishmen, Englishmen, don't say it because it's got man
Speaker 1: in the title. We got to ban men. We hate men, right.
Speaker 1: They also vetoed terms like four fathers, brotherhood of man.
Speaker 1: Even man's best friend has been blacklisted, and they suggest
Speaker 1: that instead of talking about man's best friend, you talk
Speaker 1: about a faithful dog. Birth attendant is to be used
Speaker 1: instead of midwife. It's not just it's everything about men
Speaker 1: and women and their roles with each other, their complimentary
Speaker 1: roles and things like that. So I played that clip
Speaker 1: the other day from that woman who had a complimentarian viewpoint.
Speaker 1: She says, you know, my husband provides thanks for the family,
Speaker 1: but he provides for the family. I make the family
Speaker 1: that type of thing. Realize that they have complimentary roles.
Speaker 1: They've worked together as a team for the same purpose.
Speaker 1: But no, we have to pit each other against each other.
Speaker 1: That's what the government always does. Got to pit the
Speaker 1: conservatives against the liberals or Republicans from the Democrats, and
Speaker 1: men from the women, and all war, constant war. And
Speaker 1: of course they got their own agenda. It isn't like
Speaker 1: they want an egalitarian society. They don't like a patriarchy.
Speaker 1: They want to establish a matriarchy or better yet, where
Speaker 1: they rule. And so you know, and you can see
Speaker 1: this type of stuff coming. We're talking about Bible study.
Speaker 1: I remember when the NIV was the first one. Now
Speaker 1: a lot of them do it, a lot of the
Speaker 1: modern Bible translations. Well instead of brothers do this, I'll
Speaker 1: say brothers and sisters do this or whatever. You know.
Speaker 1: So they got to make it inclusive. It's like time out.
Speaker 1: I know where this is headed. Yeah, you tell where
Speaker 1: that was headed forty years ago, and that's where the
Speaker 1: has headed. So they're clamping down. Also in phrases like
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen and maiden name. These are basically struggle sessions. Right,
Speaker 1: you have to be anti, you have to denounce yourself
Speaker 1: and all the rest of the stuff. This is struggle speech.
Speaker 1: If you will, englishmen, you change that to English person
Speaker 1: or English national were the alternatives that they supplied. They
Speaker 1: demand to control everything about our speech. We are not
Speaker 1: to question our masters. We're gonna have to do anything
Speaker 1: like that. They will tell us what we can say
Speaker 1: about whatever it is, and they will even dictate to
Speaker 1: us the words that we can use. They will change
Speaker 1: our vocabulary, they will change the language. Men in the
Speaker 1: street should be replaced by ordinary citizen, typical person. Also
Speaker 1: be useful sportsmanlike has to be avoided in favor of
Speaker 1: fair or sporting or whatever. And they've got a whole
Speaker 1: list of caveman. You gotta say, cave dweller, midwife, as
Speaker 1: I said, birth attendant, fishermen. No, that's fisher's lumberjack. Why lumberjack, Oh, well,
Speaker 1: it implies a guy, a guy who's going to climb
Speaker 1: up a tree and wield, you know, to a physical task.
Speaker 3: On.
Speaker 1: No, that's got to be wood chopper, wood chopper, postman,
Speaker 1: postal carrier, waiter, waitress. That's got to be restaurant server,
Speaker 1: man made, hand built, well, not a lot of things
Speaker 1: that are a lot of things that are man made
Speaker 1: or not handbuilt. Anyway. This was from the Daily Skeptic
Speaker 1: and they said, you know orwell warned us about this.
Speaker 1: He said, banning certain words and phrases to advance a
Speaker 1: dogmatic political ideology is a hallmark of tautalitarianism. I guess
Speaker 1: you can't say dogmatic is man's best friend political ideology,
Speaker 1: It's insane. In a private school in London, they are
Speaker 1: debuting the UK's first teacherless classroom using artificial intelligence teaching
Speaker 1: with AI powered adaptive learning, providing each student with a
Speaker 1: completely personalized learning experience. Are we going to have robot
Speaker 1: tutors next? As a matter of fact, they've made several
Speaker 1: different robot companies have made a lot of advances and
Speaker 1: of course they have given a body to the artificial intelligence.
Speaker 1: One of those companies is Neo and it has a
Speaker 1: household robot and they're going they've given this thing extensive testing,
Speaker 1: two days, two days of living with people in the house.
Speaker 1: That's the kind of testing that we're going to get
Speaker 1: with ARP, speed, vaccines all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 1: Because you on the motto of Silicon Valleys, go fast
Speaker 1: and break things, And here's their little propaganda speech. See
Speaker 1: how many issues you can find in this household?
Speaker 9: Robot Neo, in a first ever experiment, one Ex's Neo
Speaker 9: humanoid spent two days living with a human, revealing a
Speaker 9: series of unexpected results. This is partly because Neo demonstrated
Speaker 9: several intelligent abilities that shocked observers. But just how smart
Speaker 9: is it already? To start? Neo demonstrates a wide array
Speaker 9: of capabilities while doing chores around the house, from making
Speaker 9: a cup of coffee to assisting with cooking, Neo executed
Speaker 9: various real world tasks that require both dexterity and planning.
Speaker 9: On top of this, Neo can also fetch ingredients, handover utensils,
Speaker 9: and even engage in simple conversations, including telling jokes. But
Speaker 9: Neo's accelerating ability to learn and adapt to its environment
Speaker 9: on the fly is what really raises eyebrows. This is
Speaker 9: because by living among humans, NEO constantly gathers data from
Speaker 9: anyone and anything around it to grow its hive mind intelligence.
Speaker 9: These are the minds of robots around the world. It
Speaker 9: just dropped an egg via a distributed swarm brain. This
Speaker 9: will allow them to to manufacture themselves and spawn into
Speaker 9: self organizing groups of robots as NAS and respond to
Speaker 9: the needs of humans more effectively on a person by
Speaker 9: person basis. And as for autonomy, NEO uses a combination
Speaker 9: of AI models to learn and gradually increase its autonomous
Speaker 9: functionality over time. On top of this, NEO can also
Speaker 9: be teleoperated to help expedite its learning process by imitation. Importantly,
Speaker 9: this approach allows for continuous improvement and over the air
Speaker 9: updates to the robot, so that the same hardware can
Speaker 9: become increasingly useful over time. And concerning safety, firstly, the
Speaker 9: robot uses only low kinetic energy by design in order
Speaker 9: to minimize the risk of it accidentally injuring humans. Moreover,
Speaker 9: NEO is programmed to recognize and avoid dangerous situations, respect
Speaker 9: physical boundaries, and self recover from potential failures. Furthermore, NEO
Speaker 9: prevents bad actors from gaining control of it and going
Speaker 9: rogue inside of your home.
Speaker 1: When we told all this about the government.
Speaker 9: Privacy concerns are addressed through user controlled settings, with owners
Speaker 9: specifying which areas or objects NEO can interact with and
Speaker 9: what information it can access. This level of customization prevents
Speaker 9: the robot from recording, accessing, downloading, reporting, augmenting, or withholding
Speaker 9: data that it shouldn't And in recognizing the high stakes
Speaker 9: nature of giving these robots access to your home while
Speaker 9: you sleep, one X has implemented security measures and conducted
Speaker 9: extensive testing to ensure Neo remains safe from cyber threats
Speaker 9: and state actors. This focus on cyber security is intended
Speaker 9: to prevent swarms of robots from suddenly being hijacked and
Speaker 9: going rogue mass Furthermore, one X is offering twenty four
Speaker 9: hour support for its robots for the quickest resolution of
Speaker 9: any control issues that may arise around the robot and
Speaker 9: its operations or access. And when it comes to Neo's
Speaker 9: expected price per unit, one X will likely institute some
Speaker 9: kind of leasing strategy. This would involve users first paying
Speaker 9: a few thousand dollars up front as a kind of
Speaker 9: safety deposit to take a living problem robot. Then they'd
Speaker 9: continue to pay monthly subscription fees for the robots ongoing intelligence.
Speaker 9: On top of this, you'll own that thing services like
Speaker 9: giving your robot the ability to download knowledge from other robots,
Speaker 9: upgrading your robots security software and more value added extras.
Speaker 1: Yeah, would you like to have that extra Modulu bather
Speaker 1: so the robot doesn't drop eggs on the floor in
Speaker 1: the counter. You know that's going to cost you a
Speaker 1: little bit more.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 1: It's just like the heated seats that you can rent
Speaker 1: from BMW and that type of thing. Yeah, you'll own.
Speaker 1: I think you just give them several thousand dollars as
Speaker 1: your entry fee in it, and then you can pay
Speaker 1: them every month forever. And it's great because these things
Speaker 1: are always learning and they're always sharing what they learned.
Speaker 1: And where did we hear that before? We heard that
Speaker 1: about the self driving cars. They're going to be so
Speaker 1: much better drivers than humans because you know, they're all
Speaker 1: learning from each other's experience. It's a hive mind. They're
Speaker 1: all connected, and so when one of them encounters difficulty
Speaker 1: as an intersection doesn't know how to get across that
Speaker 1: four way stop or whatever, that figures it out, it
Speaker 1: passes it on to all the rest of them. No,
Speaker 1: that isn't the way it works. They all collected at
Speaker 1: one intersection just stopped clogged everything many other failure modes
Speaker 1: that they've done. Uh so, uh again, you know when
Speaker 1: you start hearing terms like spawn and swarm and it's
Speaker 1: going to be sharing information And I was like, it's
Speaker 1: going to sharing information about its experience, is sharing information
Speaker 1: about the family. It reminds me very much. I could
Speaker 1: see the point, which not too far in the future,
Speaker 1: where you've got another law law type candidate. You know what,
Speaker 1: everybody needs to have their own personal robot. You know,
Speaker 1: we just need to have that their own personal minder,
Speaker 1: their own personal snitch who's going to be watching everything
Speaker 1: that you do. And of course, as I've said for
Speaker 1: long time, the Third Amendment was to prevent that from happening.
Speaker 1: You know, the British had put soldiers and homes and said, well,
Speaker 1: you know, we need to have a place to house them,
Speaker 1: so you do it. You've got to mandate that you
Speaker 1: do it. And those soldiers weren't just sitting there on
Speaker 1: the couch asking for chips and salsa. They were spying
Speaker 1: on the people that were there. I remember it was
Speaker 1: only about a decade ago that we had David Petraeus
Speaker 1: when he was director of the CIA, said we're going
Speaker 1: to have smart refrigerators and they're going to be able
Speaker 1: to listen to your conversation. They're going to be able
Speaker 1: to report stuff to it. He said it, and when
Speaker 1: we reported it, we were called the conspiracy theorists. It
Speaker 1: was him who was saying it. And of course that
Speaker 1: is true. All of these so called smart devices, self
Speaker 1: monitoring and reporting technology are all there to spy on
Speaker 1: you all the time. The robots are really smart, per smart.
Speaker 1: They're constantly monitoring you, constantly reporting you. And we talk
Speaker 1: about bad actors hacking into a system like this that
Speaker 1: where everything is all connected, you got one central hive
Speaker 1: mind that they could tap into and reprogram. And it
Speaker 1: isn't it interesting that about the only film about the
Speaker 1: only book that hasn't been turned into a film, The
Speaker 1: only book by Michael Crichton that hasn't been turned into
Speaker 1: a film is robo Apocalypse, where people did exactly that.
Speaker 1: They took over the self driving cars, took over the
Speaker 1: robot robots, started using that to create absolute total chaos.
Speaker 1: It has again a hive mind, an internet of bots, surveillance, profiling, security,
Speaker 1: a swarm, a hive mind. All of this stuff very concerning.
Speaker 1: But I can just imagine that that'll be the next
Speaker 1: teachers that they have, right because if they want to
Speaker 1: have a teacherless school in London, and this is being
Speaker 1: touted is some great thing. Not having a person that
Speaker 1: you can talk to. Perhaps I don't know that is
Speaker 1: the Is the robot going to be able to do
Speaker 1: the kind of the same kind of gender gas lighting?
Speaker 1: Will they give it like purple hair or something? You know,
Speaker 1: I can change my body at any time I want to.
Speaker 1: You should be able to as well as a human.
Speaker 1: What are they going to use these robots for? What
Speaker 1: are the values that it's going to be transmitting. This
Speaker 1: novel approach of having artificial intelligence no teachers encapsulates the
Speaker 1: very essence of student centered education. No, the education is
Speaker 1: not centered on the student. It's centralized control of the
Speaker 1: education of all the students. It is a kind of
Speaker 1: hive mind. Already adaptive learning systems also highlight when students
Speaker 1: begin to struggle and can direct students to additional materials
Speaker 1: and also act as a virtual tutor. Again, they're talking
Speaker 1: about just using AI in the classroom, but when you
Speaker 1: look at what is really on board where they want
Speaker 1: to put robots in the factories, robots in the homes
Speaker 1: as butlers, as maids, as waiters and waitresses. When you
Speaker 1: look at that, how far away are we from having
Speaker 1: a c three po master, Luke, I can't believe that
Speaker 1: you did that. That's not that far away, and that's
Speaker 1: not really in the future that we want. Teachers and
Speaker 1: tutors are some of the next groups of white collar
Speaker 1: workers that are on the chopping block to be replaced
Speaker 1: with AI and robots, writes Wine Press News. And he's
Speaker 1: absolutely right. And guess what when we see teachers and tutors,
Speaker 1: what I think of his parents, his parents, or what
Speaker 1: are really on the chopping block. We look at this,
Speaker 1: this horrible family that this kid who shot up murdered
Speaker 1: people in Georgia came from. The mother's got a mugshot
Speaker 1: because she's been involved in math and all the rest
Speaker 1: of the stuff. Now she's the good guy out of
Speaker 1: the two parents. She's the one who gave him a
Speaker 1: half hour warning. But even with three cops permanently as
Speaker 1: signed as their primary job to this school, nothing really
Speaker 1: was done about it. They've now arrested the father, who
Speaker 1: also had a very dodgy background. But this is about
Speaker 1: sending a message about how parents are evil, about how
Speaker 1: parents are going to be held responsible for what their
Speaker 1: children's do children do, even though they keep taking the
Speaker 1: children away, So you have no input on this. We're
Speaker 1: going to tell the children, and if you disagree with
Speaker 1: what we're telling the children, then you know you're cut off.
Speaker 1: And yet, if they do gender gas lighting and the
Speaker 1: kind of things that we saw with the tranny killer
Speaker 1: in Nashville, take a child who may have some issues
Speaker 1: already and really hop on that child and turn them
Speaker 1: into a Masknow we'll come after the parents as well,
Speaker 1: because you know, the government never does anything wrong. It's
Speaker 1: always the parents. It's always the family. That's why the
Speaker 1: government needs to train our children. Well. Republican voter has
Speaker 1: got a lot more socially liberal under Trump, says reason
Speaker 1: and again, reason is not there because they're interested in
Speaker 1: trying to move the society in one direction or the other.
Speaker 1: Why did that happen? Is it because we have spent
Speaker 1: so much time excusing his behavior. If we excuse Trump's behavior,
Speaker 1: then why not have our behavior excused as well? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, hey, if he can be a hero and
Speaker 1: a savior to the world divorcing his wives and then
Speaker 1: publicly humiliating them, it's not just a divorce, I mean,
Speaker 1: that's become so commonplace in societ but nobody humiliates their
Speaker 1: x'es like Trump does so. In the usual liberal account,
Speaker 1: Trump reawakened America's atavistic, bigoted side, driving both the Republican
Speaker 1: Party in the US to the right, says Reason, and
Speaker 1: the usual conservative retort, it's the left that became more
Speaker 1: extreme in the twenty tens, adopting radical views on race
Speaker 1: and gender. That meant a moderate could seem to be
Speaker 1: moving rightward when in fact he was standing still. But
Speaker 1: there's a third possibility, says Reason, that liberals spent the
Speaker 1: decade moving leftward on questions of race and sexual orientation,
Speaker 1: and so did conservatives, because see Trump is really kind
Speaker 1: of a controlled opposition, controlled opposition for control. It wasn't
Speaker 1: for D chess. It was two D chess, two dchess
Speaker 1: that you play on a two dimensional thing like a television.
Speaker 1: And here's why. The two d's are derangement and delusion.
Speaker 1: Derangement for the left, delusion for the right. That's your
Speaker 1: two D chess chess. That's to normalize things, to go
Speaker 1: moderate on abortion. You know, you normalize this, you do that.
Speaker 1: It's just the kind of things that we have seen
Speaker 1: from our leaders. We're going to take a quick break
Speaker 1: and we're going to have our guest join us. Before
Speaker 1: I take a break, I've got a couple of comments
Speaker 1: here I want to read as well. On Rumble Bill
Speaker 1: Jones twelve thirteen, thank you, and he says, thank you
Speaker 1: for all you do, David. I appreciate that. On Rumble Wild,
Speaker 1: Niagara says cipro Phloxasen almost caused me to commit suicide.
Speaker 1: That's what as a derivative of that, they got my son.
Speaker 1: They keep changing the name. They don't call it zipro anymore.
Speaker 1: People caught on to cipro. So you understand what we're
Speaker 1: going through. I hope you're better. If you've found something
Speaker 1: that helps you, please let us know. Rock Fan Scott Helmer,
Speaker 1: thank you very much, Scott. Good to see you there
Speaker 1: so sending prayers and healing to your face only David
Speaker 1: never give up. Thank you so much. Good. I appreciate
Speaker 1: that a great singer songwriter. Go to look him up
Speaker 1: on the streaming services. He's got some great songs, really
Speaker 1: does about a lot of different topics, even does some
Speaker 1: about the pandemic and things like that. On rock Fan,
Speaker 1: Marlon Haflerson, thank you for the tip on Rumble Ratisbro.
Speaker 1: Thank you. There's a million machine March's from Animatrix soon. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what I'm worried about. The swarm, the robo apocalypse.
Speaker 1: That's really what we've got to worry about. We're going
Speaker 1: to take a quick break and we will be right.
Speaker 2: Back defending the American dream. You're listening to the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show, all.
Speaker 1: Right, welcome back. And now joining us is John Richardson.
Speaker 1: He is the founder and CEO of Richardson Nutrition Center.
Speaker 1: You can kind of remember that as RNC. It's the
Speaker 1: good rn C and so Richardson Nutrition Center. They promote wellness,
Speaker 1: healthy living through the use of safe and effective dietary
Speaker 1: supplements help the body's natural healing processes. I wanted to
Speaker 1: get him back on. We had a very interesting talk
Speaker 1: last time. We talked about B seventeen and other things.
Speaker 1: I've had a chance to sample some of his products
Speaker 1: as well. Thank you for joining us. John.
Speaker 7: My pleasure, David, as I said, you're one of my heroes,
Speaker 7: and so I've followed you for a long time, and
Speaker 7: so it's it's actually a pleasure to get on with
Speaker 7: people that are like minded. So that we can let
Speaker 7: your audience know about these truths and bring it into
Speaker 7: what's going on right now, yeah, right as we speak.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and as we speak. In just the last
Speaker 1: couple of days, I mean, we had yesterday, I think
Speaker 1: it was Kate Middleton, you know, the future Queen I guess,
Speaker 1: who's been struggling with cancer. But they've been very close
Speaker 1: lipped about it. They do not want her to even
Speaker 1: mention what kind of cancer she has. At first it
Speaker 1: was just she's got some kind of a stomach issue
Speaker 1: or whatever. Then they admitted that it was cancer, but
Speaker 1: they won't say what kind of cancer does of course
Speaker 1: they do that with Charles as well, and she just
Speaker 1: finished a course of chemo. But I thought it was
Speaker 1: also interesting that at the same time we had el McPherson,
Speaker 1: model and actress. People will remember she also had cancer,
Speaker 1: but she treated it with out chemo and said she
Speaker 1: beat it without chemo, and she talked in an article
Speaker 1: about all the struggles that she'd had with her family.
Speaker 1: Because it's the kind it's the way the medical community
Speaker 1: puts pressure on you and makes you afraid to try
Speaker 1: anything other than what they are offering. And that's really
Speaker 1: the big obstacle she had to overcome was to try
Speaker 1: to think outside the medical box that they put everybody into.
Speaker 1: It's got very interesting.
Speaker 7: Yeah, it's fascinating because I have like three degrees of
Speaker 7: separation from from her and I I usually when I
Speaker 7: commit to that, I'm going to get to talk to somebody.
Speaker 7: She came out here to Arizona and lived here eight months,
Speaker 7: you know, right in this in this neighborhood. Basically because
Speaker 7: you know, Arizona, as the people that don't know, is
Speaker 7: one of the freeest states for nutritional therapy for all diseases.
Speaker 7: They have you know, schools, they have educational institutes, they
Speaker 7: have doctor Henry Eley's out here. There's We just had
Speaker 7: a doctor come, doctor Martin, that came by the office
Speaker 7: and he used to use B seventeen regularly in the
Speaker 7: seventies and eighties. And then he told me it disappeared
Speaker 7: right about the time my dad disappeared. They whatever happened
Speaker 7: to my dad? I can't you know, I don't have
Speaker 7: any factual information about that. They took him out, but
Speaker 7: it's sure. It is strange that three of the most
Speaker 7: prominent doctors using B seventeen and Lea Trill and the
Speaker 7: treatment of the C word were all died within six
Speaker 7: months of each other.
Speaker 4: Back in the late eighties.
Speaker 1: Wow. Yeah, last time we talked to I said, you
Speaker 1: see the same thing with Carrie Mollis and the PCR test.
Speaker 1: You know, just before this whole thing rolled out, a
Speaker 1: PCR test that was used by Fauci to give the
Speaker 1: impression that they were measuring things legitimately, that they were
Speaker 1: doing real science and measurement and everything. He called Fauchi
Speaker 1: a fraud in the way that he said, you're abusing
Speaker 1: that you're trying. You can't prove that there's an HIV
Speaker 1: virus that's causing AIDS by using my PCR thing. He says,
Speaker 1: whatever's caused it. He said, what you're doing is not science,
Speaker 1: and you can be so he disappeared at that point
Speaker 1: in time as well. I mean, when you look at
Speaker 1: what the pharmaceutical companies are doing when they know what
Speaker 1: they're doing, and this is now coming out over and
Speaker 1: over again. When you look at the vaccines, and I
Speaker 1: think they knew with tests the adverse effects that were
Speaker 1: happening significantly, and in the past when there was an
Speaker 1: oppositional FDA, they would stop when there was far less
Speaker 1: risk and far less harm. They would stop these drugs.
Speaker 1: But now they know they can do anything that they wish.
Speaker 1: And so if they have that kind of a calculation
Speaker 1: where they really don't care how many people they hurt
Speaker 1: or kill, there's not really anything that's going to stop
Speaker 1: them from whatever they want to do. If they're strictly
Speaker 1: focused on the money. It's truly amazing.
Speaker 7: Yeah, well, let's say the whole system is made that way.
Speaker 7: No drug gets approved unless it's profitable. No FDA approvals
Speaker 7: on vitamins. There's no f the approval on zinc or
Speaker 7: vitamin C. You can't as a physician legally tell your
Speaker 7: patient you're treating their cancer with vitamin C, even though
Speaker 7: the line is calling one.
Speaker 4: Awards back in the seventies and eighties.
Speaker 7: So it's really a situation where people are waking up
Speaker 7: from it because of this COVID. It's unfortunately we had
Speaker 7: to go through this, this medical tyranny, but people are
Speaker 7: truly waking up to the fact that we've been lied
Speaker 7: to about so many things. And the good thing for
Speaker 7: me is that God has given me all of this
Speaker 7: material to where I feel stronger than ever I've known
Speaker 7: this all this for thirty years, David. But when I
Speaker 7: would go out to try to tell people, I'd only
Speaker 7: have my dad's story and g Ora Griffin's story.
Speaker 4: We've talked about go Griffin. A World without cancer.
Speaker 7: Ed who's ninety three, says he doesn't know anybody that's
Speaker 7: ever died of cancer that regularly eats amignalant apricot seeds
Speaker 7: and that triloicides, whatever the name is you want to
Speaker 7: call it.
Speaker 4: But they have the system matter.
Speaker 7: Just like this situation with Kate Middleton, Just like the King,
Speaker 7: they've systematically covered up the fact that he, the King
Speaker 7: that got cancer, said told the world he's not going
Speaker 7: to use chemotherapy, radiation, surgery. But you don't hear that anywhere.
Speaker 7: You don't hear that accepting quiet circles. He's using natural remedies.
Speaker 7: And it wouldn't surprise me if Kate Middleton also did that.
Speaker 4: Like you said, they're not telling us what it is.
Speaker 7: If she's successfully helping herself, you know, if she's successfully
Speaker 7: helping herself from natural remedies, they're not going to tell
Speaker 7: us that.
Speaker 1: That's all that's right, Yeah, they're not going to tell
Speaker 1: us the cancer. They wouldn't tell us what the what
Speaker 1: she's using for treatment either would they know that?
Speaker 4: We wouldn't.
Speaker 7: Yeah, they don't tell us what it is, and we've
Speaker 7: got fake pictures.
Speaker 4: It's all.
Speaker 7: It's all a si off and the battles are raging on,
Speaker 7: as you know. And you and I are not on
Speaker 7: opposite sides about much, and I'm sure if we were
Speaker 7: we could convince each other. But we do know this
Speaker 7: that they lie to us constantly, and that we have
Speaker 7: a we have to have a skeptical mind anytime something's
Speaker 7: presented to us as fact, because the truth is there's
Speaker 7: They've covered things up so many times and lied about
Speaker 7: so many things that even people that we otherwise might
Speaker 7: trust might have bad information. But we have to go
Speaker 7: dig deeper. And that's what I do. You know at
Speaker 7: r and C, it's Richardson Nutritional Center. For anybody thinks
Speaker 7: that I'm part of the r n C. That it
Speaker 7: is funny that I've had people contact and said you
Speaker 7: got to get rid of that Rona Daniels, or I'm
Speaker 7: not going to support you anymore.
Speaker 4: And I said, well, I you know, I'm right there
Speaker 4: with you. I support you in that.
Speaker 7: But my dad came up with Richard's Nutritional Center back
Speaker 7: in the seventies, because his patients would come to see
Speaker 7: him and then they would go home and not be
Speaker 7: able to get it because they they were making a
Speaker 7: vitamin illegal that was being proven without a shadow of
Speaker 7: a doubt to help prevent the C word and help
Speaker 7: people use their immune system to fight it off.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I remember when that was. In the early nineties.
Speaker 1: The FDA was trying to outlaw vitamin C, especially right
Speaker 1: and even that, but they were going to regulate the
Speaker 1: amount that you could have of all these different vitamins
Speaker 1: that you could sell over the counter. I remember the
Speaker 1: Libertarian Party was that year. I went to it. It
Speaker 1: was in Salt Lake City, and or In Hatch spoke
Speaker 1: there about the only thing we'd agree with him on,
Speaker 1: and it was because kind of like with Tom Emmery,
Speaker 1: you know, he opposes CBDC because he's connected to people
Speaker 1: who are selling cryptost well, or In Hatch was connected
Speaker 1: with people who were selling supplements in the supplement industry,
Speaker 1: and so he was opposing it. I don't know that
Speaker 1: he would have we were posing it on principle. He
Speaker 1: was posing it on the principle in terms of cash.
Speaker 4: Right, right, right, how much money hit his bank account.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, two different types of principle. So but you know,
Speaker 1: for for whatever reason, you know, we would join forces.
Speaker 1: And so it was kind of interesting to see or
Speaker 1: in Hatch addressing the Libertarian Party trying to stop the
Speaker 1: FDA from stopping people being able to have even vitamin
Speaker 1: I mean, that's where these people have been for the
Speaker 1: longest time. It's all about serving the interests of the
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical people. It's kind of interesting too when we look
Speaker 1: at el McPherson. She said that she had breast cancer.
Speaker 1: She got it seven years ago, and she said when
Speaker 1: it first showed up, she said, she had a lump
Speaker 1: ectomy in twenty seventeen, seven years ago. The doctors wanted
Speaker 1: her to do missectomy, radiation, hormonal therapy, breast reconstruction, chemotherapy.
Speaker 1: She said, I chose a holistic approach. She said, saying
Speaker 1: no to standard medical solutions was the hardest thing I've
Speaker 1: ever done in my life, but saying no to my
Speaker 1: own inner since would have been even harder. And she
Speaker 1: talks about how her family. One of her sons was
Speaker 1: with her on that decision and the other one was like,
Speaker 1: this is absolutely not going to work, and so it
Speaker 1: was a struggle within her family. It was a struggle
Speaker 1: with herself, fear of trying something that you know, the
Speaker 1: establishment is telling you that you can't do. But I
Speaker 1: think what we've seen in the last couple of years,
Speaker 1: we've seen the establishment so thoroughly discredit itself. I think
Speaker 1: that really does help people a lot. But she did
Speaker 1: it before that happened. Kind of interesting.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's a fascinating story.
Speaker 7: Like I said, she used to date Andy Wakefield, who
Speaker 7: I know intimately from the whole battle on autism and
Speaker 7: how the general public still thinks that they've never proven
Speaker 7: a link between vaccines and autism.
Speaker 4: But that could not be further from the truth, David.
Speaker 7: But you could go out and do a poll outside
Speaker 7: of any hotel in downtown a city, in any blue
Speaker 7: city in the country, and it probably be the majority
Speaker 7: of people think, oh, that's that's been disproven.
Speaker 4: That's not the case.
Speaker 7: And so we have been so inundated with medical misinformation
Speaker 7: because of the profit motive and also the fact they'd
Speaker 7: like they like to keep population control, and they like
Speaker 7: to keep us control because there's no better way to
Speaker 7: control us as a people than by our health. If
Speaker 7: you can control our health, David, you can control everything.
Speaker 7: It doesn't matter how much money you have, you'll trade
Speaker 7: it all for your health. And you know the situations
Speaker 7: are obvious. But when we get something like when we
Speaker 7: come out with a lump or bump, we.
Speaker 4: Believe that is the disease.
Speaker 7: And this is what I'm here to tell your audience.
Speaker 7: The lump or the bump, even the lump she cut
Speaker 7: out of her breast, is not the disease. Let me repeat,
Speaker 7: that is not the disease. No different than if you
Speaker 7: get chicken pox. You wouldn't cut the little pimples off
Speaker 7: of your arm to try to cure chicken pox.
Speaker 4: That is what they've done for fifty or sixty years.
Speaker 7: Failing, dreadful, dreadfully, miserably, so much so that the recent
Speaker 7: woman who was on Tucker Carlson gave up her surgery career.
Speaker 7: She was at Stanford Hospital, she was at top of
Speaker 7: her class. Carrie, I think carry means is I can't
Speaker 7: Taliti means. I think is her name, and if you're
Speaker 7: a producer, can help us find that name.
Speaker 4: She gave up her career.
Speaker 7: She was just on Tung Carlson and she broke this
Speaker 7: news and Her brother was a.
Speaker 4: He would raise funds to try to battle you know,
Speaker 4: he was one of the people that.
Speaker 7: Convinced the politicians to go with more pharmaceutical drugs. I
Speaker 7: don't know, my brain's not working to find these words
Speaker 7: this morning. But she quit her career because all she
Speaker 7: said she was ever taught to do. She put in
Speaker 7: her resignation, all she was ever taught to do is
Speaker 7: cut things out of people's body and then bill them
Speaker 7: for it. She never learned the entire system of how
Speaker 7: it worked. Cancer is an entire body system failure. It
Speaker 7: means that you have a deficiency disease that cannot fight
Speaker 7: back the cancer. So if you start by cutting out
Speaker 7: a lump or bump, all you're doing is releasing it.
Speaker 7: It's almost guaranteed to come back. Chemotherapy is just a
Speaker 7: deadly poisonous drug that does kill a cancer, but it
Speaker 7: also kills all your healthy cells. So people's hair falls out,
Speaker 7: their nails fall out, their teeth get loose, they lose
Speaker 7: their appetite, they lose weight. Radiation is simply an X
Speaker 7: ray pointed at the tumor trying to reduce it again,
Speaker 7: killing the symptom. The reason why we have that tumors
Speaker 7: because it's surrounding the cancer. It's killing the symptom and
Speaker 7: it may shrink, but it's not going to go away.
Speaker 7: These people end up dying anyway. And we watched the statistics.
Speaker 7: Over ninety percent of the people that go into that
Speaker 7: system with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery, over ninety percent of
Speaker 7: them die within seven years.
Speaker 4: It's a death it's a death cult.
Speaker 7: Cancer is the same death cult that we had with COVID,
Speaker 7: except we did it over fifty years and sixty years.
Speaker 7: And people like hands Neeper, doctor Hans Neeper, who treated
Speaker 7: President Ronald Reagan for cancer with leatrill and metabol therapy
Speaker 7: in nineteen eighty five, he had stage four colon camnser.
Speaker 7: He treated it, and he couldn't even tell people about
Speaker 7: it until later in life.
Speaker 4: He wrote, he wrote books and information.
Speaker 7: But President Ronald Reagan, who you know, signed the law
Speaker 7: that said that you couldn't sue a pharmaceutical company.
Speaker 4: He was convinced.
Speaker 7: He was a good man, I believe, but he was
Speaker 7: convinced by these pharmaceutical companies that they needed to have
Speaker 7: this protection. Otherwise we weren't going to be able to
Speaker 7: help children in the future. Now we have seventy two
Speaker 7: vaccines we have. You know, kids in California get seventy
Speaker 7: two shots by the time they're five years old. And
Speaker 7: our health is deteriorating because the more medicine they stick
Speaker 7: into us that's supposed to help our immune system. The
Speaker 7: more we deny God's medicine, which is what latrall, vitamin C,
Speaker 7: vitamin D, vitamin E, all these vitamins we need. They
Speaker 7: have us go away from those instead of going to
Speaker 7: them when we get disease.
Speaker 1: That's pretty amazing. You're talking about Ronald Reagan and the
Speaker 1: doctor who secretly treated him. You know, they really try
Speaker 1: to keep that a secret. Whatever any money is suffering
Speaker 1: from the presidence. We've got to have this image that
Speaker 1: they're invincible, but also they don't want people to know that.
Speaker 1: It's truly amazing because Reagan, that would have been and
Speaker 1: who was maybe in his early to mid seventies at
Speaker 1: that point in time, and I think he'd lived to
Speaker 1: his early nineties, didn't he how he had?
Speaker 7: Yeah, he lived nineteen years past stage four cancer. He
Speaker 7: was extremely petrified. I've interviewed a man who's on his
Speaker 7: staff literally from Connecticut who knew doctor Hansneper and helped
Speaker 7: work with this, and he knew that he was shipped
Speaker 7: off to a navy vessel off the coast of West Germany.
Speaker 7: Because doctor Hansneper was from West Germany, he was also
Speaker 7: connected with Sloan Kettering.
Speaker 4: Doctor Hans Deeper was when they were doing.
Speaker 7: This study, so he knew that leatrol worked in the
Speaker 7: mid seventies, but they lied about it.
Speaker 4: So he continued to.
Speaker 7: Use this in his practice helping people with nutritional therapy
Speaker 7: for cancer. But he was also sworn a secret, so
Speaker 7: it actually his speech writer didn't even put that Reagan
Speaker 7: had cancer un til after he passed away, and then
Speaker 7: he just mentioned that he had colon cancer, but he
Speaker 7: cured it naturally. It's documented that he cut a little
Speaker 7: piece of his colon out but avoided chemotherapy and radiation altogether.
Speaker 4: And that would have changed the world.
Speaker 7: David in nineteen eighty five, three years before my dad died.
Speaker 7: He would have changed the world, but they kept it
Speaker 7: quiet and he lived nineteen years and died of senility,
Speaker 7: basically nineteen years later after he had staged four terminal
Speaker 7: cancer in his first presidency, and no one knows this story.
Speaker 7: We have all the documentation we are putting it out there.
Speaker 7: And look at the similarities between Trump and Reagan when
Speaker 7: they both were pro vaccines and pro big farm because
Speaker 7: they had so much pressure, they were both shot at,
Speaker 7: they both had attempted, you know, assassinations, and they both
Speaker 7: on the face value, both believe in freedom of choice
Speaker 7: and natural answers to to to disease.
Speaker 1: So of course when you look at, you know, the
Speaker 1: gag order that they put on Hans Nieper about that,
Speaker 1: it's very much like when I started out of the
Speaker 1: program that I started talking about the debate and I said, yah,
Speaker 1: it's a big pageant and everything. I played a clip
Speaker 1: from Wag the Dog, And when they get the Hollywood
Speaker 1: director there, they said, you're gonna you're gonna create a
Speaker 1: war for us. It's going to be a pageant. But
Speaker 1: you can't tell anybody about it. You can never tell
Speaker 1: anybody about it, because we're going to kill you if
Speaker 1: you're tell anybody about it. You know, that type of thing.
Speaker 1: And the fact that they would do that to cover
Speaker 1: up a cancer treatment that would be an opposition to
Speaker 1: what the big pharmaceutical companies want to do. That truly
Speaker 1: is amazing with Ronald Reagan. Now, of course that book
Speaker 1: you've held up. A couple of books there, Hans Nieper
Speaker 1: and another one that was the study that they did.
Speaker 1: Those books are available at rn C as well, right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, we have rn C store dot com.
Speaker 7: You can use the discount code that people know about
Speaker 7: that should be in the description that they can get
Speaker 7: discount on all the documents that we have. We've put
Speaker 7: together the most extensive list of proving documents that we
Speaker 7: can and we have thousands more documents to go. I mean,
Speaker 7: just the strangest things we find from this vault. And
Speaker 7: it says how to legally avoid wanted immunizations of all kinds.
Speaker 7: This was a document produced back in the nineteen eighties
Speaker 7: when people knew about natural answers. But they're trying to
Speaker 7: get this out there now with the Internet, at least
Speaker 7: on shows like yours.
Speaker 4: We can get this truth out there.
Speaker 7: But we have so much documentation they've covered up, and
Speaker 7: how do we get it?
Speaker 4: David?
Speaker 7: It was hidden away to keep it from the raids
Speaker 7: of the Three Letter agencies. The president of an organization
Speaker 7: called the Cancer Control Society.
Speaker 4: Hid it away to keep it from the.
Speaker 7: Three letter agencies that were raiding his home in northern California,
Speaker 7: and so we put it in containers and we've brought
Speaker 7: it to Arizona to a location to be named later.
Speaker 4: We're scanning it, we're going through it.
Speaker 7: We're finding I mean literally newspaper clippings that were getting reproduced.
Speaker 7: We talk about leatroll on FDA Safe List, and then
Speaker 7: a poster that they put out, the FDA put out
Speaker 7: saying how it's unsafe and unnatural. We've got patriots martaling
Speaker 7: forces to fight metocrats. Does that sound like something that
Speaker 7: could come out of an article from today like his
Speaker 7: repeats itself. And then here's an author that wrote a
Speaker 7: book in the sixties who predicted his own arrest just
Speaker 7: from telling people about leatroll and B seventeen therapy basically
Speaker 7: as a natural answer to the sea word. Now, doctors
Speaker 7: have always gotten in trouble from saying that it treats cancer,
Speaker 7: and that's what we want to avoid in this day
Speaker 7: and age. So we can let doctors know just use
Speaker 7: it for their patients, use it for their people, just
Speaker 7: as a support for the immune system, just like vitamin C,
Speaker 7: vitamin D or anything else. So that's one of our
Speaker 7: messages We have at RNC store as well. Not only
Speaker 7: do we have the products available, the information available, we
Speaker 7: also counsel doctors who are across the country are waking
Speaker 7: up in droves, not woke, but waking up in droves
Speaker 7: that natural answers. Not only does it help the patients
Speaker 7: get out of the system, but they can also have
Speaker 7: a wonderful career helping people naturally. Even as an MD,
Speaker 7: you can use a mixture of some orthodox medicine, especially
Speaker 7: with surgeries and accidents and things like that.
Speaker 4: But if you if you can be proactive.
Speaker 7: On getting people the right nutritions that they need, doctors
Speaker 7: mds are learning right now that that's the path to
Speaker 7: the future.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, I'm surprised with all those documents that you
Speaker 1: had there. We didn't see anything from the FDA saying
Speaker 1: this is for horses, y'all. You know, it's that kind
Speaker 1: of stuff. They have completely destroyed their credibility. That's the
Speaker 1: only good thing that's come out of the last four
Speaker 1: years is that people have finally seen how they operate.
Speaker 1: And I had seen how they operated before this because
Speaker 1: they pulled the same stuff with COVID that they had
Speaker 1: done for their annual flu shot stuff and anything. It's like, well,
Speaker 1: we've seen this before. We know exactly where they're going,
Speaker 1: we know exactly the kind of manipulation and propaganda that
Speaker 1: they used to people. But they went even farther this
Speaker 1: time and really destroyed their credibility. You know, we talked
Speaker 1: about Ronald Reagan in nineteen eighty five having natural therapy
Speaker 1: and other things like that and surviving and not having chemotherapy.
Speaker 1: Those not too long after that, it's in about a
Speaker 1: two year period, not even about a year and a half.
Speaker 1: My father had cancer and he got chemotherapy, and his
Speaker 1: first time they gave him chemotherapy went into a coma
Speaker 1: and he died a few days later from the chemotherapy.
Speaker 1: He didn't die from cancer, he died from their chemo therapy.
Speaker 1: The same thing could have happened to Ronald Reagan, and
Speaker 1: that if he hadn't gone with a natural thing instead,
Speaker 1: he wound up living for another nineteen years. A tale
Speaker 1: that happened times. Yeah, issuing.
Speaker 7: Yeah, a friend of mine, doctor Rashid Batar, who was
Speaker 7: most likely murdered. You know, I just try to tell
Speaker 7: the truth, even though people go, oh, he was most
Speaker 7: likely murdered. I was texting him back and forth when
Speaker 7: he was said he was poisoned.
Speaker 4: He was definitely poisoned.
Speaker 7: And whether he was eventually murdered by that or it
Speaker 7: was the effect of that poisoning, any way, he was
Speaker 7: taken out. But he made it well known as an
Speaker 7: MD that ninety percent of the people that got cancer
Speaker 7: died of the treatment from the cancer. Ninety percent of people.
Speaker 7: And so you might be better off, and you know,
Speaker 7: and this is blasphemy, you might be better off just
Speaker 7: going home and enjoying the rest of your life instead
Speaker 7: of getting these poisons. Like you said, the dad was
Speaker 7: given a treatment. You know how many times I hear
Speaker 7: that people are given the first dose of chemotherapy and
Speaker 7: they're so sick afterwards, they're like, I didn't feel this
Speaker 7: sick at ever during this whole bottle of cam answer.
Speaker 7: So even that, and the FDA had to admit, David,
Speaker 7: as you joked about, you call it horse paste. They
Speaker 7: had to admit that a big dealin without a doubt,
Speaker 7: caused people to get off painkillers. Our whole medical system, David,
Speaker 7: has become where painkillers pain is the is the symptom
Speaker 7: that everyone wants to fix.
Speaker 4: You've got something wrong with you, you've.
Speaker 7: Got to get a painkiller to get that pain away.
Speaker 7: It doesn't have anything to do with taking care of
Speaker 7: the disease. So we're taking pharmaceutical drugs for painkillers or
Speaker 7: anti virals or antibacterial and anti this and that to
Speaker 7: get rid of pain. When that's a symptom of what's wrong.
Speaker 7: That's tells your body telling you God telling you you're
Speaker 7: doing something wrong. Stop eating that thing, stop doing that thing,
Speaker 7: Stop drinking that alcohol, or doing whatever you're doing that's unhealthy.
Speaker 7: Learn fix the problem. And that's what we've gotten away from.
Speaker 7: And that's what we're getting back to, is resulting the
Speaker 7: underlying problem so that we don't die soon. We don't
Speaker 7: die of the treatments instead of dying from quote unquote
Speaker 7: the deficiency disease, which we don't have to die ed Griffin,
Speaker 7: ninety three. And the huns Is, who he documented lived
Speaker 7: in the turn of the century, lived to be one
Speaker 7: hundred and twenty one hundred and thirty years old, and
Speaker 7: they ate up to two hundred apricot seeds a day.
Speaker 7: I'm not saying here that apricot seeds are the all
Speaker 7: encompassing answer to every disease in the planet. But I
Speaker 7: have studies that I've found in this vault where famous,
Speaker 7: world famous dentists proved that a cavities were actually a
Speaker 7: deficiency of vitamin B seventeen. Believe it or not, David,
Speaker 7: we found that information. This has been covered up.
Speaker 4: Of course.
Speaker 7: That's much more profitable to drill holes and fill with
Speaker 7: things and do all sorts of treatments. I'm not saying
Speaker 7: dentists are all bad, but there's natural answers to the
Speaker 7: things that go on in our mouth, just as proven
Speaker 7: over history as are all these medical answers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, a step and think of a vitamin C and ricketts.
Speaker 1: I mean that's a you know, that's just a deficiency
Speaker 1: in vitamin C. There's all different.
Speaker 7: Things, Surby, I know what you meant, Rickets, vitamin gates, Yeahby, Yeah, Yeah.
Speaker 7: Two point four million people died a year, David bat
Speaker 7: three hundred years ago, and that's a natural, easy answer.
Speaker 7: We don't know about scurvy. The same thing is going
Speaker 7: on with the seventeen. It's just so hard for us
Speaker 7: to believe it. They want to keep us in fear,
Speaker 7: just like they did with COVID, so that we try
Speaker 7: this vaccine, which is not a vaccine at all. It's
Speaker 7: been well proven. It's a gene therapy, no question about it.
Speaker 7: We no question that more people died have died from
Speaker 7: the results of that vaccine than ever died of COVID.
Speaker 7: The treatments for COVID is what killed people. And this
Speaker 7: is information that you know, three years ago probably would
Speaker 7: have got me put in jail. But people were saying
Speaker 7: back three years ago, and now it's coming out in
Speaker 7: the general public. So people are more skeptical of the
Speaker 7: medical establishment than they've ever been and time.
Speaker 4: To wake up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, it is. And I wish you know
Speaker 1: when they pull the stuff on us all the time.
Speaker 1: I'm just at the point now where I'm absolutely done
Speaker 1: with a medical community after what happened. You know, first
Speaker 1: I told you what happened to my father, then my
Speaker 1: son gets ciproo Floxen. Well it's not actually that was
Speaker 1: it was of that family, of the Floxen family. Same
Speaker 1: thing as chemotherapy, and the people are talking about says,
Speaker 1: it's the same exact thing. It continues to attack your body,
Speaker 1: continues to attack your mitochondria after you take it, even
Speaker 1: just a small amount of it. And when I start
Speaker 1: looking online to see if I can find some natural
Speaker 1: remedies or things like that. What I see are you
Speaker 1: know from web md and these other places, Well you
Speaker 1: should have some SSRIs if you're having trouble sleeping. It's like,
Speaker 1: are you kidding me? SSRIs? Or they say gaba penton.
Speaker 1: Gabapentin was something that gave my wife after she had
Speaker 1: a hip replacement, and it caused her to have all
Speaker 1: kinds of issues. Just the initial dosage of that. It
Speaker 1: took us quite a while to get her detoxed from
Speaker 1: that made her pass out all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 1: It was just amazing to see these things that they
Speaker 1: just prescribed them like candy. They'll go down. And these
Speaker 1: doctors that you talked about the doctor who said, well,
Speaker 1: my only job was to cut things out of people.
Speaker 1: You know, Well, the other doctors, their prescription is to
Speaker 1: look at a table of symptoms and then tell you
Speaker 1: what the pharmaceutical industry wants you to take at the moment,
Speaker 1: and without any regard to any kind of safety concerns.
Speaker 1: And they don't tell you what the safety concerns are.
Speaker 1: It's just amazing.
Speaker 7: Yeah, they don't have any tests that test them all together.
Speaker 7: No matter what they say about a drug test that's
Speaker 7: always tested by itself. They do that so that there's
Speaker 7: you know, they call these double blind studies. They test
Speaker 7: that one drug by itself. It's never tested with two, three,
Speaker 7: four or five vaccines.
Speaker 4: Seventy two vaccines. That never happens.
Speaker 7: Even when they try to say they've done safety tests,
Speaker 7: most of them, a couple of people died, or a
Speaker 7: couple of people had heart failure, a couple of people.
Speaker 4: At liver and now they allow, now hundreds.
Speaker 7: Of people have died before they take a drug off
Speaker 7: the off the the you know, the market and this
Speaker 7: whole thing.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 7: One of the things we talked about was Zuckerberg coming
Speaker 7: out and now saying that he was convinced not to
Speaker 7: let people know about natural answers to COVID.
Speaker 4: He was convinced, he was strong armed.
Speaker 7: It's amazing, David to think to hear that, to hear
Speaker 7: that information coming out. But I think Zuckerberg is like
Speaker 7: the rat leaving the sinking vessel. He he literally has
Speaker 7: seen that things he's done has killed people. People have
Speaker 7: had heart attacks because of him, People have lost their
Speaker 7: children because of him. And so it's all well and
Speaker 7: good that at this eleventh hour when it's all coming
Speaker 7: out everywhere that he's going to jump ship and kind
Speaker 7: of try to throw the administration under the bus. But
Speaker 7: the truth is he knew, he knew very well. He
Speaker 7: lied over and over again. And so I'm one of
Speaker 7: those people. Yes, I believe God can forgive people, you know,
Speaker 7: whatever they've done in their lives. By one of the
Speaker 7: people that still thinks that we need to pursue him
Speaker 7: paying for this. He needs to needs to pay for
Speaker 7: this evil lying. Yeah, you can say it. I admit it,
Speaker 7: and I give him credit for that instead of waiting
Speaker 7: for him to be completely taken out later. But I
Speaker 7: don't forgive him, and I don't forget it, and I'm
Speaker 7: not the one to judge him. God will be the
Speaker 7: one to judge him, but our criminal justice system needs
Speaker 7: to deal with him whatever happens. I'm not saying it's
Speaker 7: going to David, but that's what I'm putting out there.
Speaker 4: And I'm not.
Speaker 7: Afraid of Facebook and Zuckerberg, just like what happened with
Speaker 7: the CEO of YouTube, the powers to be, the evil
Speaker 7: ones that want is dead, don't care who they kill.
Speaker 7: They're defficult. And this woman who supported the vaccine and
Speaker 7: pushed the vaccine and told everybody to get it.
Speaker 4: Died of turbo cancer at fifty four.
Speaker 7: Can't even pronounce her name, but she was the CEO
Speaker 7: of YouTube that probably kicked you off. I had a
Speaker 7: channel with subscribers and got kicked off because I was
Speaker 7: just telling people about natural answers and she lost her
Speaker 7: life and they don't care.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, and they kicked me off. They kicked
Speaker 1: me off for telling people about the Federal Reserve. They'll
Speaker 1: kick you off for anything.
Speaker 4: Well, like Ed Griffin.
Speaker 7: They call ed Griffin a right wing extremist because he
Speaker 7: told people the truth about the Federal Reserve and creature
Speaker 7: from Jacal Island and told people the truth about cancer
Speaker 7: fifty years ago. David and even Patriots for people that
Speaker 7: are right minded still think cancer is the lump of
Speaker 7: the bump, or they think it's something we catch, or
Speaker 7: it's something some chemical they give us. No, it's our
Speaker 7: immune system not having the proper nutrition the enzymes.
Speaker 4: And I think I've mentioned this.
Speaker 7: To you about the professor at Loyal University who came
Speaker 7: out in nineteen seventy eight and said that this may
Speaker 7: be the end to breast cancers. His name was doctor
Speaker 7: Harold Manner. He was the head of biology at Loyola
Speaker 7: University for thirty years and he studied amygdalin with mice
Speaker 7: or bread to grow breast cancers and wiped out eighty
Speaker 7: nine percent of the cancers and said this may mean
Speaker 7: the end of mastectomies. And he was fired in the
Speaker 7: nineteen seventies, left penniless and had to move to Mexico
Speaker 7: and actually died ninety days before my father in nineteen
Speaker 7: eighty eight.
Speaker 1: Wow. Wow, that's amazing. Yeah, And I really want to
Speaker 1: thank you for persisting on this because you know, as
Speaker 1: these people are so persistent, we have to be equally
Speaker 1: persistent to tell people truth as persistent as they are
Speaker 1: to try to cover it up. I think many times
Speaker 1: about my wife was protesting an abortion clinic in Austin.
Speaker 1: That is science. It stopped black genocide, you know, And
Speaker 1: they had the lefties show up. It's the first time
Speaker 1: we'd seen anti FOP people and they showed up with
Speaker 1: a black sign. They didn't have anything to say. They
Speaker 1: just want to stop you from saying what you're saying.
Speaker 1: And so he tried to hold in front of her
Speaker 1: sign and she go down below him and go down.
Speaker 1: Let you go, are going up and down, up and
Speaker 1: down to show this thing. It's just amazing that they
Speaker 1: just want to silence people. And and we know what
Speaker 1: it is that they want to do. Now you've got
Speaker 1: that you were talking about Zuckerberg, You've got an article,
Speaker 1: extensive article talking about this. Tell people where they can find.
Speaker 7: That, well, it's it's on our website at rncstore dot com.
Speaker 4: Uh if you if you use.
Speaker 7: The Forward Slash newsletter, you just sign up for you
Speaker 7: just put your name and your email. And I know
Speaker 7: people are cautious about that. We don't use it for
Speaker 7: you know, spamming people. But this is where we can
Speaker 7: send out this information. We have all the research about
Speaker 7: what Zuckerberg said and what he did and and you know,
Speaker 7: just explain to people that it's not time to go, oh,
Speaker 7: let's go jump back on Facebook. And now they're telling
Speaker 7: the truth because Zuckerberg's seeing the light. Just know, he's
Speaker 7: covering his butt, He's just covering his rear and he
Speaker 7: they brainwashed the entire world, and you know by by
Speaker 7: censoring and and and the deep platform. And it's not
Speaker 7: something you can just ask forgiveness to get away from
Speaker 7: they need to. If he really means that, we'll see
Speaker 7: if that's just a news cycle. It came out and
Speaker 7: said that Trump was a bad ass for standing up.
Speaker 7: And it's all, like you said, David, just like my
Speaker 7: good friend Jio Griffin, it's all this play we're watching
Speaker 7: and we don't know where it's all going to come down.
Speaker 4: But we have to fight our own battle. We have to.
Speaker 7: That's why we can't just leave our health up to
Speaker 7: the powers that be. We can't leave our information up
Speaker 7: to the powers that be at Google and Facebook. We
Speaker 7: have to hold them to account and continue telling the truth.
Speaker 7: And like your wife, if you get censored here, you move.
Speaker 4: It over here.
Speaker 7: If you get censored there, you move it over here.
Speaker 7: We're on I think you're on the Rumble Channel, and
Speaker 7: I think maybe we're on live right now. In Rumble Channel,
Speaker 7: which I think is a great platform, it seems like
Speaker 7: they're not censoring information, and things are starting to go viral.
Speaker 7: People are starting to realize if they want the truth
Speaker 7: about health freedom, or political freedom, or even even financial freedom,
Speaker 7: that they got to go to a platform that doesn't
Speaker 7: censor the truth, no matter what the truth is. And
Speaker 7: I'm a person that believes every freedom of speech is
Speaker 7: the most important freedom we have, because we can't talk.
Speaker 7: If you and I can't disagree about something without being
Speaker 7: shut off or one of the other of us being
Speaker 7: told to go away, then we're not really speaking.
Speaker 4: We're not really a free people.
Speaker 7: We're not free and we can't and we're never gonna
Speaker 7: the battle against this tyranny without freedom of speech and
Speaker 7: freedom of the opportunity to get our message out there.
Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, And it's ridiculous what they're doing now. I
Speaker 1: just saw it as an article in Germany. The German
Speaker 1: government is coming after some guy because on social media
Speaker 1: he called a German minister fat. Well, she actually is fat,
Speaker 1: you know, but it was what they're really after is
Speaker 1: they saying you don't have the you don't have the
Speaker 1: freedom to insult. And that's especially true of our masters,
Speaker 1: our political masters. But this is a few years ago.
Speaker 1: You have and Ron Atkinson, the comedian in the UK,
Speaker 1: said please feel free to insult me. You know, we
Speaker 1: must be able to keep this freedom of speech, you know,
Speaker 1: without it, he was saying, we don't have any comedy,
Speaker 1: but we also don't have any freedom to say anything.
Speaker 1: If you can shut somebody down because you hurt their
Speaker 1: feelings about it, because you said something that was mean spirited.
Speaker 1: The reality is is that if they shut down our speech,
Speaker 1: that is the key thing. That is why it was
Speaker 1: number one on the list a bill of rights that
Speaker 1: Madison and other people added to the Constitution because it
Speaker 1: is so foundational. I've said before, I think it is
Speaker 1: even more foundational than the Second Amendment. You're not even
Speaker 1: going to know who to shoot at if you don't
Speaker 1: have free speech right. I mean, you will not even
Speaker 1: rise up against tyranny, let alone resist it in any way,
Speaker 1: shape or form, if you don't know that the tyranny
Speaker 1: is happening. And that's why the tyrants come after free speech.
Speaker 1: And it is a program that is designed to enslave us,
Speaker 1: designed to kill us. And that's what the medical side
Speaker 1: is all about. And so it continues to escalate. We've
Speaker 1: got several people who have left messages here we're on
Speaker 1: Live on Rock. Fan Scott Helmer, thank you for the tip.
Speaker 1: He says, please post this full interview to David's x
Speaker 1: account so it can be shared with friends and family.
Speaker 1: And we do. We do that every day. We will
Speaker 1: pull out every interview that we do we put it
Speaker 1: on our Rumble channel and on Rock Fin and on
Speaker 1: a bit shoot and a huge tube, and we put
Speaker 1: it on our x account, So we do that every
Speaker 1: day as well as gap. We put it on gab
Speaker 1: as well, and so you know every interview that we
Speaker 1: do is up there, and we'll also pull out a
Speaker 1: couple of clips from the show as well as the
Speaker 1: full show always will be up there and on Rock Fin.
Speaker 1: Jessica Morrow, thank you for the tip, says thank you David,
Speaker 1: especially for your show today. I am a long time
Speaker 1: listener and I've been diagnosed with stage four melanoma. I'm
Speaker 1: forty six and a mother of two. Your topic today
Speaker 1: is so true. I have dealt with two different high
Speaker 1: hospitals here in the Northeast, one of them being quite
Speaker 1: famous for cancer treatment. And all they want to do
Speaker 1: is a single protocol of drugs down my throat or
Speaker 1: in my arm. It's very sad.
Speaker 7: It is sad Mayo Clinic. I'm guessing Mayo Clinic. And
Speaker 7: here's here's not a funny story. And I just want
Speaker 7: to tell her to take heart because I have a
Speaker 7: friend whose name is Rick Hill, who's celebrating his fiftieth
Speaker 7: year of being cancer free when he was sent home
Speaker 7: at the age of twenty four by Mayo Clinic saying
Speaker 7: he had stage four cancer and he was going to die.
Speaker 7: He is celebrating in October his fiftieth year being cancer
Speaker 7: free using.
Speaker 4: Metabolic therapy including leatrell.
Speaker 7: He actually spoke to the Congress in the nineteen seventies
Speaker 7: to keep them.
Speaker 4: From outlawing it.
Speaker 7: They wanted to outlaw a nutritional substance that's found in
Speaker 7: twelve or different foods that's primarily found in.
Speaker 4: The apricot seed.
Speaker 7: That's why we talk about the apricot seed because it's
Speaker 7: the easiest way to get it right there.
Speaker 1: I've got apricot seeds also a little bit about that
Speaker 1: and the april. I you know, when you eat this,
Speaker 1: you got to go a little bit. So I couldn't
Speaker 1: believe when you said there's that tribe that ate the
Speaker 1: two hundred of them a day, because oh, it looks
Speaker 1: like almonds and several of them in my mouth, and
Speaker 1: it kind of gets I don't know how to describe it.
Speaker 1: It was a very interesting sensation that you get test
Speaker 1: many of them, you know, at one time, but there's
Speaker 1: something there for sure.
Speaker 7: Yeah, it's horrible tasting, and the thought is that what
Speaker 7: they what the bad guys say, what Google says, is
Speaker 7: you're getting sinai poison when you get these reactions. It's
Speaker 7: absolutely nearly impossible to get sin and poison unless you
Speaker 7: drank a bunch of baty glucosa days at the same time.
Speaker 7: And that's it's it's it's a longer story than we
Speaker 7: have time for now. But I want to tell people
Speaker 7: that God created vitamins to keep us disease free. If
Speaker 7: we just listen to what he said, and I've repeated this,
Speaker 7: I'm gonna go Genesis one twenty nine. Behold, I have
Speaker 7: given you every plant yielding seed that is on the
Speaker 7: face of the earth, and every tree with seed is fruit,
Speaker 7: shall have them for food. God did not provide us
Speaker 7: these seeds to poison us. That's the lie they want.
Speaker 4: To tell us.
Speaker 7: David Magdallen is broken apart only in the presence of
Speaker 7: an abnormal cell. That's where beta glucosa dase is. So
Speaker 7: if you eat a handful of them, you're probably going
Speaker 7: to give yourself an upset stomach because your body's not
Speaker 7: used to dealing with it. The average American diet gets
Speaker 7: about one milligram of amignalin in a day. My dad said,
Speaker 7: Ed Griffin said, you need one hundred to two hundred
Speaker 7: milligrams a day.
Speaker 4: Not a whole lot.
Speaker 7: It's only like five or ten apricut seeds. There's twenty
Speaker 7: milligrams in each apricot seed. And David I eat regularly
Speaker 7: forty a day. Now, I with the caveat. I don't
Speaker 7: recommend that to everybody, and because if you do that,
Speaker 7: you're going to get upset stomach. You're not going to
Speaker 7: get cyanide poisoning. That doesn't happen. The body has rodinase,
Speaker 7: called the protecting enzyme, which breaks the any free cyanide
Speaker 7: that's developed if you come in contact with the cancer
Speaker 7: cell is broken down by rodina that turns it into up
Speaker 7: pain reliever. That's why the FDA can't deny that amignalant
Speaker 7: causes pain relief. But I'm going to be at the
Speaker 7: Healing for the Ages conferences. We go with doctor Brian Artists,
Speaker 7: doctor ED Group, who many people know from Global Healing.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I know Leatrill. I just talked to doctor Edgroup yesterday.
Speaker 7: He used lea trill back in the nineteen nineties and
Speaker 7: two thousands until he got demonized by the FDA. It's
Speaker 7: we had to move away from it and started global healing.
Speaker 7: We're working together on a project that I'm not going
Speaker 7: to announce yet. We're working on it to bring this
Speaker 7: to more people in a way that's that's not so
Speaker 7: nasty tasting as the apricot seed.
Speaker 4: Because this is the best way to get it.
Speaker 7: It's also the hardest way for people to do because
Speaker 7: they don't like the taste of it. So we're trying
Speaker 7: to make it, grind it up and put it into
Speaker 7: seed meals so people can put it in their smoothies
Speaker 7: or their oatmeal. But again I must repeat, I'm not
Speaker 7: the only one that has it. It's not a trademark.
Speaker 7: God has the trademark on it. That's the thing that
Speaker 7: they hate. They hate that this little seed can wipe
Speaker 7: out a two trillion dollar industry, and so they'll lie,
Speaker 7: cheat and steel to stop people from knowing about this.
Speaker 4: And I'm not the only one has it.
Speaker 7: You can grow in your own yard and you can
Speaker 7: eat foods that have a me going in it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it says there on the light of California
Speaker 1: grown tested pesticide and nerveside free air dry. It looks
Speaker 1: very much like almonds, and like I said, you know,
Speaker 1: it's kind of a kind of a strong taste. I
Speaker 1: just grabbed a handful of them. It's like almost popping
Speaker 1: in is. I think these one or two at a
Speaker 1: time when you're first there and it's like, oh, okay,
Speaker 1: well but I survived, didn't have any problems. I didn't
Speaker 1: even have an upset stomach with it. And then I've
Speaker 1: got this as well. The seed caps. Tell us a
Speaker 1: little bit about the seed caps.
Speaker 4: Yeah, seed caps is just our answer. It's it's very simple.
Speaker 7: We squeeze the oil out of it to keep it
Speaker 7: from going rancid, and we grind it up our seed powder.
Speaker 7: It has the oil pressed out and that we put
Speaker 7: it in a capsule. So if you don't like the taste,
Speaker 7: you just take it. It gets for your upper colon
Speaker 7: and goes to work in your in your stomach. So
Speaker 7: that's just a way to to get a separately, you
Speaker 7: can get it as pure latroll. I have the bottles
Speaker 7: back here for somebody that wants more potency one hundred
Speaker 7: milligrams of pure latrol five hundred milligrams. We even offer
Speaker 7: it in a liquid latroll what some people use to
Speaker 7: add to their ivs.
Speaker 4: Just like vitamin C. The crab doctor.
Speaker 7: Krebs, who is the kind of the proponent of the
Speaker 7: sixties and seventies who is getting the word out there,
Speaker 7: said when people said, well how much should I do
Speaker 7: if I have, somebody said, get as much into your
Speaker 7: system as your immune system can handle. So they did
Speaker 7: many toxicology studies back then and even more recent that migdalen,
Speaker 7: even though they try to make you fearful of the
Speaker 7: cyanide thing, and we've talked about that.
Speaker 4: Is safer than sugar.
Speaker 7: And my wife even goes, honey, stop saying that because
Speaker 7: sugar's poisoned. The number one thing you need to do
Speaker 7: if you're trying to be healthy is get off sugar.
Speaker 7: But pure amigdalan is safer than sugar and has We
Speaker 7: have many studies and many documentation and it's all available
Speaker 7: at R and C store dot com for people to
Speaker 7: look up, understand and read it. It's not just John
Speaker 7: Richardson having some patent or trademark on this this item.
Speaker 7: It's it's it's available out there in the world, and
Speaker 7: we want to teach people so they can't take that
Speaker 7: away from us, so they can't keep us afraid and
Speaker 7: going to do chemo, rushing to chemotherapy, radiation and surgery
Speaker 7: when we have an issue.
Speaker 1: Well, it's very important and it's very important for us
Speaker 1: to arm ourselves with the truth before something happens. You know,
Speaker 1: it's just in our particular case. You know, you got
Speaker 1: an emergency infection that is is really rapidly building and
Speaker 1: you're concerned about that. We didn't know the history of
Speaker 1: these you know, flocks and the family of these drugs
Speaker 1: and everything like that, and it didn't ring a bell
Speaker 1: and I was I was sick of the time myself
Speaker 1: as well. And so you know, they take advantage of
Speaker 1: your ignorance, is what they do. I've got a couple
Speaker 1: of questions here comment a question on Rock Finn and says,
Speaker 1: my sister worked at UA B and four researchers quietly
Speaker 1: announced that they'd found a possible care for cancer. I
Speaker 1: don't know what type, but they were shut down. Heard
Speaker 1: that over and over again. And I've got this from
Speaker 1: Brian and Dev McCartney. Can you ask him about doctor
Speaker 1: Stanslaws Brazinski and if he knew him?
Speaker 7: Yeah, I do know him more know of him. Were
Speaker 7: not personal friends. But he's out of Houston. I've driven
Speaker 7: by his clinic. I have a good friend that does
Speaker 7: know him where. There was actually a study David Dunn
Speaker 7: at a hospital in Houston that proved that amygdalen helped
Speaker 7: prevent or treat seven different types of sea word. Now
Speaker 7: I'm going to use that in that sentence because they
Speaker 7: were also shut down. Obama administration shut it down. People forget, well,
Speaker 7: why would they do that? Why would they do that?
Speaker 7: For an answer, because people forget that the entire medical
Speaker 7: industry is supported by the pharmaceutical industries.
Speaker 4: So at this hospital there was.
Speaker 7: Ten or twenty million dollars worth of drugs being tested
Speaker 7: through the pipeline. Pizer is buying companies that have come
Speaker 7: up with a new drug for cancer.
Speaker 4: This is a profit machine.
Speaker 7: So, like I said, if there was a study done
Speaker 7: at a hospital or someplace like Sloan Cattering the seventies
Speaker 7: that proved read the title of this and you can
Speaker 7: watch this using your night as People's affiliate code. You
Speaker 7: can watch this for free on our website as long
Speaker 7: as it stays up on Rumble because they took it
Speaker 7: down from Facebook. But it showed that it stopped the
Speaker 7: spread of cancer, and they lied to us about it.
Speaker 7: This was in the nineteen seventies. If you don't think
Speaker 7: they're doing that to us now, If people don't think
Speaker 7: they're doing that to us now.
Speaker 4: This is the answer that they don't want us to
Speaker 4: know about.
Speaker 7: And as long as I can keep standing up in
Speaker 7: my soapbox and preaching this and getting information out there
Speaker 7: there for such a time as this, people are receptive
Speaker 7: to it, David, because they've gone through the things that
Speaker 7: you have, and many of your viewers have gone through
Speaker 7: the same thing. They shut down the natural answers because
Speaker 7: there's no profit in it. Yeah, the system doesn't sustain
Speaker 7: itself that way. That's why we have to scrap that
Speaker 7: system eventually and go from the point of view of
Speaker 7: healing the person, not treating their their pains or their
Speaker 7: symptoms and just masking them, but healing the person.
Speaker 4: That's what we have to go back to. It's not
Speaker 4: you know, boody medicine.
Speaker 7: It's scientifically proven natural answers to disease that we need
Speaker 7: to open up to the world and that should be
Speaker 7: the first route people take, the first to take.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah, it's time for a paradigm shift. I mean,
Speaker 1: how can we look at what has happened in the
Speaker 1: last four years and not understand that. But you know,
Speaker 1: I just recently I looked up a supplement in in
Speaker 1: and the people that I got it from, and I
Speaker 1: saw that they got shut down during the COVID stuff
Speaker 1: because they said something that was really pretty innocuous, saying,
Speaker 1: you know, well this this really does help with but
Speaker 1: you have to be very careful about that. If you
Speaker 1: make a particular statement or claim, they will use that
Speaker 1: then to shut you down. They completely shut those people down.
Speaker 1: I remember when things were happening and people were concerned, said, well,
Speaker 1: we got this this thing out there, and I said, look,
Speaker 1: you know SARS and things like this. You know, these
Speaker 1: are are not really novel or new. And I read
Speaker 1: quotes from people who had been one of them was
Speaker 1: still at either the FDA or the NIH, and I said,
Speaker 1: here's what they're saying. They're saying that it builds up
Speaker 1: your body's defenses. It doesn't necessarily kill a particular disease,
Speaker 1: but it builds up your body's defenses so that you
Speaker 1: fight it naturally. And so I read the quotes from
Speaker 1: both the NIH and from the FDA for that. But
Speaker 1: if you go out and you say, well, it's going
Speaker 1: to cure such and such a disease, and that's not
Speaker 1: really the paradigm because, as you point out, we're not
Speaker 1: focused on a disease. We're not focused on cutting off
Speaker 1: you know, a bump or cutting off a lump or whatever.
Speaker 1: That's not really the disease. The disease is more systematic,
Speaker 1: and that's why you're approaching it from a nutritional standpoint.
Speaker 7: Absolutely, that's and that's the safest way to approach it
Speaker 7: for doctors, for health practitioners, for people to understand that
Speaker 7: we're supporting the immune system. We have all over our
Speaker 7: website that this has never been approved by FDA. I'm
Speaker 7: not a doctor, I don't treat patients. I'm just a
Speaker 7: historian that's pushing this message out there and giving people
Speaker 7: the data they need to make their own decisions. And
Speaker 7: that's what we have to do. We can't bury our
Speaker 7: head in the sand anymore, David. We can't just hope
Speaker 7: someone else is going to protect us. There's going to
Speaker 7: be white nights coming in and rescue us at the
Speaker 7: last possible second, even who are voting for President even
Speaker 7: though I think it's a clear there's a clear difference
Speaker 7: between the two people on face value. Now, I don't
Speaker 7: think that's our answer to our future. Our answer is
Speaker 7: for us to be educated, us to learn the truth
Speaker 7: and get it and spread amongst our tribe. The people
Speaker 7: that we love the most, the people that follow you
Speaker 7: listening to your truth. They know you tell the truth,
Speaker 7: regardless of it whether it's best for your financial reasons
Speaker 7: or not.
Speaker 4: Same thing for me.
Speaker 7: I sell a book on my website, David that says
Speaker 7: can't serve free with food. It actually teaches anybody who
Speaker 7: buys it how to put me out of business.
Speaker 4: What a crazy thing.
Speaker 7: To do, because if you eat the right foods, you
Speaker 7: don't need John Richards, so you don't need this story.
Speaker 7: If you eat the right foods and take the right nutrients,
Speaker 7: you can avoid the sea word in your lifetime and
Speaker 7: avoid it for any of your family members. It's really
Speaker 7: just an educational and making the right choices when you're eating.
Speaker 7: The problem is most of our choices are limited to processed.
Speaker 4: Foods at the grocery store.
Speaker 7: The fast food place, and left to our own devices,
Speaker 7: we're going to eat things that are sugary, and salty
Speaker 7: and taste delicious and have no nutritional value. So sometimes
Speaker 7: eating the right thing taste horrible. But God told us
Speaker 7: that's what we need to eat for food. So I
Speaker 7: recommend people follow what God said.
Speaker 1: That's a that's a really good spiritual analogy. Well, sometimes
Speaker 1: that's a better taste, but it's what He's got for
Speaker 1: our best interest. And you know, there's been a lot
Speaker 1: of talk about hyperprocessed foods and all this other kind
Speaker 1: of stuff, and so a lot of there was an
Speaker 1: article that just was published in addition to that said, well,
Speaker 1: you know a lot of people say, well I don't
Speaker 1: want to have junk food and anything, so they're eating
Speaker 1: really good stuff. They're eating salad and having fat free
Speaker 1: salad dressings and everything. That said, well, do you realize
Speaker 1: that the colon cancer is going up because this stuff
Speaker 1: is just loaded with chemicals. It's just an imitation of
Speaker 1: the other stuff. You know that that is natural and
Speaker 1: it just is permeated throughout our food supply. You know,
Speaker 1: the wheat is adulterated from genetic modification, and it's from
Speaker 1: selective breeding even before the genetic modification. But now they're
Speaker 1: going to be doing gmo wheat. Everything is adulterated like that,
Speaker 1: So it is really difficult to eat natural and eat
Speaker 1: really clean. Even the people think they're eating clean are
Speaker 1: getting some kind of a fake imitation of food.
Speaker 7: You need to supplement unfortunately with what the food that
Speaker 7: we have available. But some of the guidelines that my
Speaker 7: beautiful wife has taught me to really follow, even though
Speaker 7: you know, I've been a person who ate a lot
Speaker 7: of dairy, she said, as if you're if you're battling
Speaker 7: a disease and you want to get healthy, you feel better,
Speaker 7: stay away from dairy, stay away from gluten, and stay
Speaker 7: away from sugar.
Speaker 2: If you can.
Speaker 7: Those are the three hard things to Everybody likes the
Speaker 7: hot fresh buns with you know, uh, you know, with sugar,
Speaker 7: and you know, cakes and things like that. If you
Speaker 7: can stay away from those three things besides what I'm
Speaker 7: talking about, you know, dairy, gluten, and sugar, you can
Speaker 7: avoid a lot of disease. And those things have been
Speaker 7: kind of pushed on us over time because those industries
Speaker 7: had the most mind to spend to get on that
Speaker 7: food pyramid, and so it is a financial thing. But
Speaker 7: our food right now is mostly garbage, mostly garbage, So
Speaker 7: we do need to supplement, and that's unfortunate, but it's
Speaker 7: a lot cheaper than the other method to treat after
Speaker 7: you get it, you know, and try to fight it
Speaker 7: that way.
Speaker 3: Oh.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, well, I'm really interested to see what's going to
Speaker 1: come out with a collaboration between you and doctor Group.
Speaker 1: Tell I said, Hi, Will such a nice guy.
Speaker 7: Really, I'll see him this weekend. I'll see him with
Speaker 7: Ryan Artist, doctor Schmidt.
Speaker 4: From gold Care.
Speaker 7: They're doing amazing things, David. I don't know if you're
Speaker 7: familiar with what.
Speaker 1: I don't know then, but I do know doctor Group
Speaker 1: and I have the most respect for him. He is
Speaker 1: such a nice guy, very sincere in what he does,
Speaker 1: and you know, one of the nicest people I've ever met. Really.
Speaker 7: His factory is ten twelve minutes away from me. I
Speaker 7: don't want to tell people exactly where I am.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but he's out in Arizona too, somewhere.
Speaker 7: No, he has his main office in Houston, but his
Speaker 7: factory is out here in Arizona. And we're going to
Speaker 7: be doing lipisomal versions of BB seventeen, which are absolutely amazing,
Speaker 7: and we're working on it right now. And you know,
Speaker 7: it's not like I'm announcing something that's private. It's a
Speaker 7: naturally occurring substance. I'm never going to have a trademark
Speaker 7: to it. I don't want to trademark to it. I
Speaker 7: don't want to be the only person, David. It protects me.
Speaker 7: With more people that know about it, and more people
Speaker 7: are growing in their garden and you know, getting it so.
Speaker 1: And we taught about life. You're talking about having it
Speaker 1: bonded essentially to fat so that it's more absorbable into
Speaker 1: the system that correct.
Speaker 4: Well out the whole body.
Speaker 7: It was invented by the the skincare companies spent millions
Speaker 7: of dollars on it, and then doctor Group has spent
Speaker 7: the last eight years perfecting it from nutritionally.
Speaker 4: He said.
Speaker 7: They dropped it in the skincare line because they were
Speaker 7: taking all these poisons and making it to go all
Speaker 7: to different parts of your body, so it wasn't helpful.
Speaker 4: It's only bybosomal.
Speaker 7: Technology is only good if what you're bringing to people
Speaker 7: is actually good for them.
Speaker 4: So that's what he's developed.
Speaker 7: At Global Healing, and we're going to be doing that.
Speaker 7: I'm excited about it.
Speaker 1: So I'm really excited about that. Yeah, Vitamin lyposomal vitamin C.
Speaker 1: We've been taking that for a while and that's in
Speaker 1: our family have known about that, so that's great to
Speaker 1: see that happening with other things. The Richardson Nutrition Center
Speaker 1: rn C, and it's RNC store dot com. It's where
Speaker 1: people can find things.
Speaker 4: That's right. R and C store art dot com.
Speaker 7: Remember, don't tell me about how to how to run
Speaker 7: the Republican National Committee.
Speaker 4: I'm going to help anybody with that.
Speaker 1: So that's right.
Speaker 7: And he'll give you some special benefits and things to
Speaker 7: help you if you use the code night And we're
Speaker 7: going to put up some links on our website let
Speaker 7: you know about that.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I'm all about people trying to find alternatives.
Speaker 1: You know, we need to have alternatives to the Fiat dollar,
Speaker 1: we need to have alternatives to this fake, dangerous medical system.
Speaker 1: We've got to have a parallel society. That's the only
Speaker 1: way that we're going to be able to survive this stuff.
Speaker 1: These people are out to destroy everything in our society
Speaker 1: as well as our bodies and our souls, and so
Speaker 1: we've got to start educating ourselves and taking advantage of this.
Speaker 1: And you have a wealth of things to educate people
Speaker 1: about there with Publications an excellent resource source. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much John for what you do. Again it's RNC
Speaker 1: store dot com. Thank you, John, appreciate it.
Speaker 4: Thank you, David God bless thank.
Speaker 1: You, and thank you all for listening and for joining
Speaker 1: us today. That's it for today's broadcast. Have a good day.
Speaker 1: We'll talk to you tomorrow hopefully. As your news been censored, banned, censored,
Speaker 1: banned over and over again, has vital information been held
Speaker 1: prisoner by mainstream and anti social media, it's the duty
Speaker 1: of every thinking person to make the great escape to
Speaker 1: the Davidnightshow dot com. There you'll find links to live streams, videos,
Speaker 1: audio podcasts, and support links. Live stream the show at
Speaker 1: d Live and every Monday through Friday nine am Eastern.
Speaker 1: Videos at bitch Shoot and huge Tube, new audio podcast
Speaker 1: The Real David Night Show at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart
Speaker 1: and more. But even though there's a light at the
Speaker 1: end of the tunnel, without your support, the show will
Speaker 1: run out of gas. The links to support the show
Speaker 1: are at the Davidnightshow dot com. To donate via subscribe star,
Speaker 1: donate via p or donate via cash app, Bitcoin or
Speaker 1: po box. Are sincere things to all of you who
Speaker 1: have stood with us to get this fall. Please don't
Speaker 1: forget to share the links and pray for the country
Speaker 1: as well as our family.