Speaker 1: H yeh yeh m h. What's up. Welcome everybody. We're
Speaker 1: having a good night tonight. It's going to be a
Speaker 1: little dark and I can tell you that. But I
Speaker 1: couldn't resist covering it because it was something I remember
Speaker 1: on a live stream the other day with who I
Speaker 1: was talking to, or I think I was talking to
Speaker 1: Jamie and we were talking about uh, Australia.
Speaker 2: And the events in Australia also, and I remember that
Speaker 2: I'd read an essay from a supposed former Satanist.
Speaker 1: Again, this is all going by what he claimed, So
Speaker 1: I don't know, there's no way to you know, want
Speaker 1: to presue verify these types of things. But and as
Speaker 1: you know, in the tops that we've been in the past,
Speaker 1: we kind of classify things and hard proof, uh you know,
Speaker 1: first person testimony, which is like the next level down
Speaker 1: from art proof. And by hard proof, I mean four cases,
Speaker 1: you know, really well documented books, these kinds of things.
Speaker 1: And then we've got people's personal testimonies about you know,
Speaker 1: their abuse to know what happened to them when they
Speaker 1: were kids, which I'm not saying it's false, but it's
Speaker 1: also you know, something that it's very difficult to prove
Speaker 1: decades later, so simply don't know. In a lot of cases,
Speaker 1: you know what the real story was. But that's not
Speaker 1: to say that they were lying or have something like this.
Speaker 1: So tonight we're going to be talking about this essay
Speaker 1: that's not what's on screen right now. That's just want
Speaker 1: to be Wikipedia article that I think will be somewhat relevant.
Speaker 1: Yet they can tell you this guy to see there
Speaker 1: we go anyway, hopefully nobody hopefully y'all gonna still occur
Speaker 1: anybody I know, I know. Yeah, So this is an
Speaker 1: We're going to class this in the layer two level
Speaker 1: two domain of things that are probably true. And so
Speaker 1: some examples of these things would be, as we said,
Speaker 1: first person testimony. I would also say, not just the
Speaker 1: first person testimony, it's about what happened then, and like
Speaker 1: transformation to Captay O'Brien book or Kurt Barker's books, because
Speaker 1: those books have a lot of the two music's playing.
Speaker 1: I had two music's playing. Yeah, oops, is that better?
Speaker 1: That should be better? You can barely see those little
Speaker 1: icons to turn the music off. But so this will
Speaker 1: be in the class of categories of things that I like,
Speaker 1: how people think that that's like that your test of
Speaker 1: IQ is how well you can click these little stupid icons.
Speaker 1: So my IQ is low. I'm okay with that. I'm
Speaker 1: okay with that. I'm a low IQ. I'm I'm still
Speaker 1: a beautiful slow boy even if I'm a slow boy.
Speaker 1: Now beautiful slow boys mount up rough Ritto, easy ritos. Anyway,
Speaker 1: what were we talking about. We weren't talking about Nate
Speaker 1: dog This hit the east side of the LBC on
Speaker 1: a mission ton of farm, mister Warren G. No, We're
Speaker 1: nothing about Nate Dogg. We're talking about the essay of
Speaker 1: the former Satanic priest claimed to be one of the
Speaker 1: heads of I think he said he was the head
Speaker 1: of the Outer Order in previous decades. This person apparently
Speaker 1: passed away in twenty ten. But with these kinds of documents,
Speaker 1: what I was trying to say is that if we
Speaker 1: think about the day tapes, right, doctor day Tapes, they
Speaker 1: kind of were in this amorphous unsure territory for a
Speaker 1: long time until we started seeing more and more of
Speaker 1: the world order unfolding in the ways that it has,
Speaker 1: and as a result of that that kind of has
Speaker 1: vindicated the day tapes. So anybody that had skepticism about
Speaker 1: the Day tapes. You can go watch the YouTube videos
Speaker 1: the New Order of Barbarians, which covers the whole Day tapes.
Speaker 1: That's been proven, right, so we know the Day tapes
Speaker 1: were authentic. That really was a meeting of all of
Speaker 1: these doctors at the Rockefeller operation that they were running
Speaker 1: back in the late sixties. One doctor there happened to
Speaker 1: be pro life doctor Day and he tapes it right,
Speaker 1: and he Richard Day, and so then we get the
Speaker 1: full story of this sort of secret elite doctor meeting,
Speaker 1: and other meetings like this have also kind of been
Speaker 1: proven to be correct. The the report from Iron Mountain
Speaker 1: for many years was lampooned as a conspiracy theory, and
Speaker 1: then it turns out that it was actually based on
Speaker 1: a real event, which Miles Copeland discusses in the introduction
Speaker 1: to Game of Nations. The real thing that our report
Speaker 1: of Fire Mountains based on, and basically the rapport from
Speaker 1: Our Mountain is correct. Uh. You know, Bilderberg group, that
Speaker 1: was a semi secret meeting for many, many years, and
Speaker 1: oh not every media outlet, but mini media outlets ignored
Speaker 1: it or acted like it didn't exist. And then of course, yes,
Speaker 1: Bilderberg does exist. Everybody knows about it now. The former
Speaker 1: head of Builderberg is Klaus Watt, and so he's still
Speaker 1: on the committee and he's now running the World Economic
Speaker 1: for him telling us that we will go into thela
Speaker 1: have nothing and jewel like it. So this essay, and
Speaker 1: it's a pretty long essay, I read it twice because
Speaker 1: I really wanted to get the details right. I looked
Speaker 1: up a lot of the claims and sources, and pretty
Speaker 1: much everything matches up, so I would say that this
Speaker 1: is probably correct. It probably really was. He seems to
Speaker 1: have knowledge of things that a scam artist in the
Speaker 1: sense of like not having any exposure to these cults
Speaker 1: or these societies, wouldn't have. I think it's pretty easy
Speaker 1: if you've researched a lot of this material over the
Speaker 1: years to figure out when somebody's you know, bs ing.
Speaker 1: And this sounds pretty authentic. And a lot of the
Speaker 1: details that he recounts will line up with what we
Speaker 1: read about in regard to organized crime. So he's actually
Speaker 1: going to make a pretty open, clear argument that the
Speaker 1: way that this cult that he's in, and he's of
Speaker 1: course touting it as the greatest Satanic cult of all
Speaker 1: time or whatever, who knows. Maybe it was. I don't know,
Speaker 1: but you know, these people are very prideful, so obviously
Speaker 1: they self aggrandize to extreme degrees. So we will have
Speaker 1: to keep some a degree of skepticism here. He doesn't
Speaker 1: actually make any outlandish supernatural claims. Rather, to the contrary,
Speaker 1: he will make some pretty mundane claims when it comes
Speaker 1: to powers, so to speak. But what we're going to
Speaker 1: notice is that the worldview that he has is perfectly
Speaker 1: in line not just with what's rolling out now, but
Speaker 1: with the worldview that we've seen the elites exemplify in
Speaker 1: the Global Elite book series. So we've covered fifty plus
Speaker 1: of these writings from the top geopolitical strategists, planners, social engineers, technocrats,
Speaker 1: et cetera. Families last one hundred years. And even though
Speaker 1: a lot of those people aren't outright quote Satanists, the
Speaker 1: plan is exactly the same. So it doesn't matter whether
Speaker 1: you're an atheist Luciferian Satanists. The plans are the same
Speaker 1: and they have a common agenda. So we can debate
Speaker 1: all day long about who's in what cult or in
Speaker 1: what sect, which elite person is in this it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter because the end goals same, And what we're gonna
Speaker 1: see is that this guy is going to point out
Speaker 1: where does he go. He goes by the name Fratter
Speaker 1: Fraud if you don't know, like in the Satanic culture
Speaker 1: instead of Father there, you know, if you're an ordained
Speaker 1: Satanist or high priest, you're Fratter Fraster. He's Frater six
Speaker 1: one six or something like that. I think it is name,
Speaker 1: but yeah, six one six Frad six one six. So
Speaker 1: he will claim to be the head of one of
Speaker 1: these high Satanic orders in Australia. And the reason that
Speaker 1: we're we're focusing on this, the reason I remembered this
Speaker 1: essay that he wrote is because of what it claimed
Speaker 1: at the time about Australia, which to me just seemed
Speaker 1: kind of far fetched. And I mean, you know, we
Speaker 1: we're not we're open to conspiracy quote theories around here,
Speaker 1: so we we we don't have a problem speculating about
Speaker 1: these kinds of things or and making it clear when
Speaker 1: we're speculating. But at the time when I read this,
Speaker 1: and I was very you know, into all the stuff
Speaker 1: that I'm still into, so I had a very clear
Speaker 1: picture of the world. I'd read a lot, even not
Speaker 1: as much as I have now obviously, but I mean
Speaker 1: most of the views I have now have not changed
Speaker 1: since twenty ten, so just acquired more information. But even
Speaker 1: I thought at the time, this is out there, okay,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a little much. It's in the
Speaker 1: Fritz Spring, our territory of stuff. It's in the you know.
Speaker 1: But now what we've seen happen in Australia, I can
Speaker 1: believe that that Australia is a essentially an occultic Satanic
Speaker 1: test bed, and that, as he will claim in his essay,
Speaker 1: that they have basically captured the government a long time ago.
Speaker 1: Uh now he's specific just talking about the political intrigue
Speaker 1: and works of his cult in just in Australia. And
Speaker 1: as you guys know, we've covered in culture in Australia.
Speaker 1: I did a whole in depth breakdown on my rock
Speaker 1: fin If you're not familiar with that, be sure and
Speaker 1: go check that out. It's pretty wild. I went pretty
Speaker 1: deep into I mean, I've studied this stuff for a
Speaker 1: long time. I read most of the books out there
Speaker 1: on in Cultra and there was stuff about Australia. I
Speaker 1: had no idea. I had no idea about all the
Speaker 1: operations and you could probably. I'm sure it's all over
Speaker 1: the world. I mean, it's this crazy. That doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that all the doctors in Australia knew what they were
Speaker 1: up to, right, Because the way in culture worked was
Speaker 1: that the CIA had basically set up these academic and
Speaker 1: university fronts and these groups like the Human Ecology Foundation,
Speaker 1: and they were just using the research of the doctors
Speaker 1: through these fronts and foundations. So I'm quite sure that
Speaker 1: many many of these doctors didn't know they were working
Speaker 1: essentially for the CIA, or maybe some of them did.
Speaker 1: Some of them, I'm sure they did, right. I mean
Speaker 1: that we saw in that series there was actually a
Speaker 1: serial an mklter doctor who was a legit serial killer, Yes,
Speaker 1: an actual serial killer hired to be an Kilter doctor,
Speaker 1: doctor Harry Bailey, who did a bunch of sleep experiments
Speaker 1: and basically just put everybody to death. Right. He's got
Speaker 1: like a mind controlled Jack of Orkian by the way,
Speaker 1: And I don't know, I've not read much about doctor Kiborkian,
Speaker 1: but I kind of think he's probably one of these
Speaker 1: guys too. He's probably a I mean, I don't know
Speaker 1: if he's an m Kilter doctor, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 1: And if you look up his artwork, his artwork is
Speaker 1: I mean this, he's a serial killer, right, I mean
Speaker 1: all the serial killer artwork, as we've discussed on our
Speaker 1: serial Killer stream series, it's always satanic, right. The theme
Speaker 1: are replete with the satanic, the demonic, human sacrifice, cannibalism,
Speaker 1: and that's literally all that's everything that's in Coubworkian's art.
Speaker 1: So I probably should pull it out. I was looking
Speaker 1: for this the m Culter stream because everybody should hear that.
Speaker 1: I went really deep into I can't find it. Oh,
Speaker 1: here it is Secrets of m Culture. So if you
Speaker 1: go to my rock over on the rock, baby, all right,
Speaker 1: you go to the rock and you watch this one,
Speaker 1: it's gonna tie in well with what we're talking about tonight.
Speaker 1: So there's that link. And yeah, let's do a little
Speaker 1: a little brief analysis of old doctor Jack's artwork. I
Speaker 1: mean it's pretty rough, dude. So here's a dude a
Speaker 1: slide off into hell feet head first, with his feet
Speaker 1: in your faith, I'm guessing right, here's another dude that's
Speaker 1: literally sliding off into hell like and then you can
Speaker 1: see that little demon faces down there ready to grab him,
Speaker 1: chopped off heads, a blood dripping off the canvas, literally,
Speaker 1: a Roman centurion eating people. I mean, what a demon?
Speaker 1: Multiple faces? So mpdd I d possession? Clearly what's going
Speaker 1: on with this dude? Right? Not hard to figure out?
Speaker 1: Dude putting hands in his butt? I don't know what
Speaker 1: that is? What's going on there? Easter bunny with a
Speaker 1: bola tricks on his head and then looks like some
Speaker 1: kind of stupid YouTuber dude coming out of a easter egg?
Speaker 1: Or is that supposed to be an evil Jesus? I
Speaker 1: don't know what that is, but obviously it's demonic, blasphemous.
Speaker 1: Just I mean, you don't paint this kind of stuff
Speaker 1: unless you're I think some of these people are. They
Speaker 1: do psychedelics too. I would bet that the Koborkian was
Speaker 1: probably into psychedelics because a lot of the artwork looks
Speaker 1: quasi psychedelic, right like this. You gotta see this, hopefully
Speaker 1: I'm showing you. I mean, that's clearly a psychedelic thing.
Speaker 1: More guts and cannibalism. I mean, what is wrong with
Speaker 1: these people? A lily coming out of a skull? I
Speaker 1: don't know what that look at this. Look at this
Speaker 1: nasty bitch getting a Jack Koborkian tattoo all over her
Speaker 1: back and look at that she's got it all sing
Speaker 1: eye at the top. What a lunatic. These people are nuts, dude,
Speaker 1: people have gone crazy. What is it something to do
Speaker 1: with Oh this is like he painted this painting that
Speaker 1: Christianity and the Bill of Rights in the Constitution are
Speaker 1: trumped by Christianity. So Christianity is what has limited him
Speaker 1: from being able to have his demonic orgy feast of
Speaker 1: death and cannibalism. That's literally what I mean. He even
Speaker 1: talks about that. He's like, the Christians are holding me
Speaker 1: back from my freedom, and we'll see that tonight. That
Speaker 1: makes perfect sense with the stuff that we'ld be looking
Speaker 1: at in terms of the so called freedom that the
Speaker 1: Satanic occult elite believe that they possess and believe that
Speaker 1: they will bring about. In their quote aon now, somebody
Speaker 1: had a stupid bitchy quote or comment fussing about the
Speaker 1: title of my video. I don't believe that they're going
Speaker 1: to bring in a Satanic aon, dummy. I'm saying that
Speaker 1: this is their worldview. Do I know if the this
Speaker 1: is equivalent to the end Times. No, I don't know that.
Speaker 1: We don't try to speculate and say we know when
Speaker 1: the end times is. It could be right, and the
Speaker 1: saints and elders say that when it is, the end
Speaker 1: times will know. I did a whole two hour talk
Speaker 1: on the bat system seventy eighty and all that. So
Speaker 1: go watch that first and welcome every O. Got five
Speaker 1: over five hundred people. Wow, big crowd. Welcome everybody, be
Speaker 1: sure and hit like and share, and we're going to
Speaker 1: get into this guy's essay. And I'm sure there's some
Speaker 1: people that know about the background of Covorkian, but again,
Speaker 1: it's just it's striking that he would make artwork that
Speaker 1: looks just like the kind of artwork that BTK does.
Speaker 1: It looks like Gaycy's artwork and painting. It looks like
Speaker 1: the artwork of Mad Dog McKenna. So all these serial killers, right,
Speaker 1: they're impelled almost to like paint out these just disgusting fantasies.
Speaker 1: So let's see, let's get into Frauter's essay. And I
Speaker 1: wanted to point out too, I don't know, we may
Speaker 1: not get to all this because this is a long essay,
Speaker 1: but I wanted to get into the similarities between materialism
Speaker 1: and uh, chaos magic. I don't have any interest in
Speaker 1: chaos magic, but I was listening to philosophy lectures and
Speaker 1: a lecture popped up in relationship to this person's essay
Speaker 1: as the father of modern magic that he recommended as
Speaker 1: some great philosopher. Right, So he was saying a lot
Speaker 1: of people think Crowley is the father of modern Satanism.
Speaker 1: He said, no, it's actually Crawley that's a grandfather of
Speaker 1: modern Satanism. The real father is oh, what's that guy's name,
Speaker 1: I just forgot it, Peter something, Peter Carol, Yes, Peter
Speaker 1: James Carroll, the father of chaos magic. And of course
Speaker 1: a lot of Hollywood people. We know a lot of
Speaker 1: musicians are into chaos magic. What's that weird band Deinford,
Speaker 1: They're into chaos magic. Johnny Depp says he's into chaos
Speaker 1: magic anyway, some other people, I'm sure. But now why
Speaker 1: this matters? Well, what was interesting, and I think maybe
Speaker 1: I'll do a different talk on this subject. But the
Speaker 1: reason chaos magic was interesting is not because of the
Speaker 1: Hollywood people or whatever, but because it's so similar to
Speaker 1: Kantianism and the materialist worldview, because in the Kant you know,
Speaker 1: transcendental idealist system, the world is really unknowable. You don't
Speaker 1: know what's out there. It's sort of chaos in a way,
Speaker 1: and so the structure that the world appears to have
Speaker 1: is just imposed by the mind. Right. So ultimately, Kant,
Speaker 1: although he wasn't really a syllipsis the position can end
Speaker 1: up in syllipsism. And when you get into syllipsism, you're
Speaker 1: only a hop skipping to jump away from the idea
Speaker 1: of say ah Carl Jung that oh the reality justused
Speaker 1: to rejection of your mind, dude. Right, So it's not
Speaker 1: just that you don't know the external world now, it's
Speaker 1: actually your subconscious is projecting all of this. You're living
Speaker 1: in a dream, dude, right, Like the matrix worldview, This
Speaker 1: philosophy one on one idiots and philosophy one on one, right,
Speaker 1: having the conversation, but what we live in a matrix, dude,
Speaker 1: we don't even know it, right, literally that level stuff. Now,
Speaker 1: So how does this relate between materialism and well, because
Speaker 1: in the materialist worldview, consciousness is just an emerging property
Speaker 1: or an emergent property. It just court it sort of
Speaker 1: just springs there. It's just chaos. It just springs up, right,
Speaker 1: because all there was was matter. There was a inexplicable bang.
Speaker 1: It gave birth to matter. Matter spun around and did
Speaker 1: a bunch of boring shit for millions of AONs, and
Speaker 1: then that turned into like a belly button length. It
Speaker 1: spins and spins and spins, and it turns into a planet.
Speaker 1: And then the planet turns into a primordial ball of
Speaker 1: soup that gets hit by lightning and then it cooks ambos. Somehow,
Speaker 1: it just happens, bro, and the amibas turned into apes,
Speaker 1: and then the apes turn into dinosaurs, and then that
Speaker 1: turns into I'm joking, but and then that turns into
Speaker 1: the humans, right, and then consciousness emerges, dude, right, or
Speaker 1: maybe you have a Terrence McKinnon of you that, uh,
Speaker 1: there was a monkey that ate a mushroom, literally and
Speaker 1: that's that's where consciousness comes from.
Speaker 3: There was a monkey one time that just tripped his
Speaker 3: bottles off and became a man. He said, I am
Speaker 3: because he was tripped in so hard. So consciousness is
Speaker 3: literally a product of the mushroom or deep empty.
Speaker 1: That's literally his view. Where we've covered that in our
Speaker 1: Global League books series. We actually did many of the Psychonauts.
Speaker 1: We've done multiple psycho Knot books. So, and the way
Speaker 1: that we get to materialism is through the pathway of
Speaker 1: the prior philosophers who may or may not have been
Speaker 1: esotericist or occultist or a meticist themselves. Yes, we can
Speaker 1: show we know that Hegel was influenced by Cobbalism and
Speaker 1: different gnostic systems Kant perhaps we don't really know, doesn't
Speaker 1: really matter. It's Beinosa. We know who is influenced by
Speaker 1: a pantheism and these kinds of things. So these philosophers
Speaker 1: really set the stage for the revive inadvertently. I don't
Speaker 1: think that all of them were intentionally trying to revive occultism,
Speaker 1: although some of them were. Some of them were into
Speaker 1: hermetic you know, alchemical stuff. Newton was right. They really
Speaker 1: just opened the doorway, set the stage for this revival
Speaker 1: of the eighteen hundreds nineteen hundreds of the occult societies.
Speaker 1: And that's where we're going to get to things like
Speaker 1: this of the Oto Typhonian order and these kinds of
Speaker 1: branches off of a different Germanic Occultic, European pagan and
Speaker 1: Western hermetic alchemical traditions, which themselves you could say are
Speaker 1: kind of branches perhaps out of Freemasonry and these kinds
Speaker 1: of things, right, But modern Satanism is really also born
Speaker 1: from these same ideological pools and strains. But one weird
Speaker 1: thing about the Satanic groups is that they oftentimes want
Speaker 1: to provide a lineage. Right. This is where you get
Speaker 1: the idea that for them, they actually like it when
Speaker 1: somebody leaves Christianity who's a Christian priest, because they believe
Speaker 1: they still have that power, and then this makes them
Speaker 1: all the more powerful as a Satanist priest, right, And
Speaker 1: that really has to do with the Roman Catholic perspective
Speaker 1: on ex opera operato. Right, for an Orthodox person, we
Speaker 1: don't believe that a priest who becomes a Satanist the
Speaker 1: day after he's ordained in the Roman Catholic Church can
Speaker 1: continue to confect the Eucharists, right, that's not the orthodoxy.
Speaker 1: Roman Catholics do believe that, and you can see in
Speaker 1: the history of European Satanism and black magic that that
Speaker 1: idea passed into their groups as well. In fact, you
Speaker 1: could even argue perhaps that ex opera operado is kind
Speaker 1: of a magic type of view, right, because it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what your faith is. You can be a total apostate,
Speaker 1: but you still possess this technology, this power to confect
Speaker 1: the body and blood of God. Right, so you're sort
Speaker 1: of this God controller. Literally, That's how they view it, right,
Speaker 1: the Satanists, I'm saying, and they adopt that view. I'm saying.
Speaker 1: My claim is that out of this aberration of the
Speaker 1: medieval Latin Roman Catholic view of the sacraments. Anyway, So
Speaker 1: this individual's basically writing his kind of you know, last
Speaker 1: essay memoirs, and he's saying, you know, to I guess
Speaker 1: his followers or his group, that a lot of people
Speaker 1: in the modern world don't realize it, but Satanism is flourishing, right,
Speaker 1: the occult and explicitly Satanism, not just hermeticism, but the
Speaker 1: actual Satanic groups. And I think if we were to
Speaker 1: try to figure out what characterizes the various Satanic groups,
Speaker 1: I think everyone knows that Anton Labay's group is a
Speaker 1: kind of a more of a front type of thing.
Speaker 1: It's more of an atheistic just a kind of hedonistic group.
Speaker 1: But what this figure argue is, this person is that
Speaker 1: the Church of Satan was really a front for his group.
Speaker 1: I don't know whether that's true. I think it's probably
Speaker 1: likely that behind the scenes you had people, powerful, wealthy people,
Speaker 1: right elites, black nobility, perhaps putting money into probably founding
Speaker 1: something like the Church of Satan. Probably the CIA as well.
Speaker 1: I think the CAA my guess, my suspicion is that
Speaker 1: not all the CIA, but elements within the CIA probably
Speaker 1: had a direct relationship of connection to the founding of
Speaker 1: the Church of Satan. He doesn't say that, but he
Speaker 1: does say that his cult does have a direct connect
Speaker 1: to various intelligence agencies, including the CIA. And so he
Speaker 1: says that we are growing a lot of people are
Speaker 1: choosing Satanism as an actual, explicit, open worldview. And he
Speaker 1: says people are not going to realize that or believe it,
Speaker 1: and they will continue on in their blinded muggle worldview.
Speaker 1: Right And he's right about this, right now, this is
Speaker 1: an evil guy, and he's explicit about his evil. He's
Speaker 1: glad that he's an evil guy. So when if you
Speaker 1: hear me saying that he's correct about certain things, I'm
Speaker 1: not advocating his worldview. I'm just saying that regardless of
Speaker 1: you know, evil or good. He's factually correct in that statement.
Speaker 1: And he will say throughout this essay that you will
Speaker 1: see more and more Satanism. You will see open Satanism.
Speaker 1: You will see Australia, you know, really exemplifying this and
Speaker 1: guess what exactly. And he even goes so far as
Speaker 1: to say that nobody will ever stop this precisely because
Speaker 1: they can't see it something spiritual. They have, he says,
Speaker 1: intentionally been blinded. Now he thinks they've been blinded from
Speaker 1: his magic, right, like their cult magic is literally intended.
Speaker 1: I'm not joking to dumb you down. And he will
Speaker 1: say that, So whatever you think of the Satanic groups
Speaker 1: or cults, right, you may think that it's all like
Speaker 1: satanic panic, Heraldo bullshit or whatever. Right, Okay, you can
Speaker 1: think that, but it's a objective fact that this is
Speaker 1: the case. That's this is what these people believe, and
Speaker 1: this is what they say. And they even say this
Speaker 1: in the open. So again, remember we've covered this theme
Speaker 1: throughout right that putting the stuff in the open is
Speaker 1: a way to you know, it's it's a way to
Speaker 1: kind of put a spell on you, because it's a
Speaker 1: form of gas lighting and it's a form of putting
Speaker 1: it in your face that you are a dumb sheep. Right.
Speaker 1: And again, I'm not trying to say that the Satanists
Speaker 1: are good guys, but they're going to be correct. I mean,
Speaker 1: don't you think if Satan showed up, he would say
Speaker 1: correct things? Right? He would say, the world is you
Speaker 1: know something that I I the world worships me inadvertently,
Speaker 1: Satan would say, and I know how the world works.
Speaker 1: I know how humans work. And really, Satan is kind
Speaker 1: of like the greatest con man, right, He's like the
Speaker 1: greatest what would we say, human compromiser? Right, he knows.
Speaker 1: It's like the line there's a great line in Devil's Advocate,
Speaker 1: right when right, what's his name? I just went blank?
Speaker 1: Al Pacino says, I'm a fan of man. Right, he's
Speaker 1: a fan of man. Not really, but he's a fan
Speaker 1: of man in the sense of I love to play
Speaker 1: the heart the strings of man because man is so
Speaker 1: easy to do, because all you got to do is
Speaker 1: appeal to his base desires. Right, And that way we
Speaker 1: could look at the seven sins or that, you know,
Speaker 1: those these classic ideas of the the vices as ways
Speaker 1: to entrap you. So We're gonna look at Satan in
Speaker 1: this way as if he's like the great intelligence handler. Right,
Speaker 1: you can think of him that way.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: He's not a fan of man in the sense of
Speaker 1: liking man, Right, he's a fan of man in the
Speaker 1: sense of like man is just such such a funny,
Speaker 1: you know, predictable creature. And again, in that sense, you
Speaker 1: will you will be surprised that in the world today
Speaker 1: there's really only two groups that really understand what's going
Speaker 1: on in the world, and that's serious committed occultic Satanists,
Speaker 1: Luciferians and Christians. That's it. No one else can really
Speaker 1: figure out what's going on. Now. There's people who get
Speaker 1: parts of the story, right, there's people who figure out
Speaker 1: geopolitical you know, machinations, and they figure out conspiracies at
Speaker 1: one level, and who was behind this fake flag operation? Yeah,
Speaker 1: people figure that kind of stuff out, right, But you're
Speaker 1: gonna notice that this guy has the full picture, like
Speaker 1: he knows what's going on. And one reason he knows
Speaker 1: what's going on, as he himself says, is that he
Speaker 1: talks and worked with intelligence sadencies, and he says basically
Speaker 1: that they had compromised Hello compromised a lot of the
Speaker 1: Australian political structure. Now, we've seen multiple documentaries about Satanism,
Speaker 1: pe d O and organized crime in Australia in the
Speaker 1: last year. We've covered it in multiple talks, the Serial
Speaker 1: Killer Talks, right, we went deep into that and this
Speaker 1: essay only serves to confirm all of that information and research.
Speaker 1: So you're gonna get a heavy dose of truth tonight.
Speaker 1: Can you take it right? That's the question here, and
Speaker 1: I want to remind you too, if you want to
Speaker 1: support the show, you can ask your questions by a
Speaker 1: super I will not read any questions that are completely
Speaker 1: ridiculous or out of the balance of do sobriety and policities.
Speaker 1: That's niceties with politeness combine them. It's a new word.
Speaker 1: But so he says, I'm gonna explain to you how
Speaker 1: this whole structure works. And he even kind of laughs
Speaker 1: about it, like I just put it out there. I
Speaker 1: don't get any care right now, he's he's kind of anonymous.
Speaker 1: I guess nobody can really like to say they'll, you know,
Speaker 1: but the fact that so much of this has proven true,
Speaker 1: I think gives validity to this. He says, I got
Speaker 1: into this occultic stuff back in the seventies in college.
Speaker 1: I went to these sort of I think, he says,
Speaker 1: something like seances, I don't know, something goofy. That turned
Speaker 1: into invitations to more ritual based systems of magic and
Speaker 1: black masses and this kind of stuff. And he says,
Speaker 1: you know, it started with orgies and they draw people in.
Speaker 1: He says, with like the sexy stuff, right, Oh, come
Speaker 1: to this, you know, sexyrg y, It'll be a lot
Speaker 1: of fun. And then he says the deeper that he
Speaker 1: got into it, it was he realized it was more
Speaker 1: and more connected with things like like organized crime. And
Speaker 1: he says that the people who were really successful at
Speaker 1: what brought in the money for his group were the
Speaker 1: people that were able to have a legitimate business as
Speaker 1: a front and then doing criminal operations under that cover.
Speaker 1: And he says that's the way that a lot of
Speaker 1: these cults get money as well, as he says, through
Speaker 1: connecting through intelligence agencies, black operations, these kinds of things.
Speaker 1: And it goes on to say that another big thing
Speaker 1: that his group was involved in was the production of
Speaker 1: pro in so not going to go into a lot
Speaker 1: of detail with that due to being on this platform,
Speaker 1: but you can imagine what kinds of stuff that we're
Speaker 1: talking about. And then he says that a lot of
Speaker 1: people don't realize that Australia is sort of the global center, epicenter,
Speaker 1: as well as England, London and Australia of the global
Speaker 1: Satanic network. He says it is the supremely Satanic government
Speaker 1: and he's going to give some pretty interesting statistics to
Speaker 1: prove that, because he says, you will see crazy things
Speaker 1: happen in Australia and brutal oppression that will prove me correct,
Speaker 1: he says. And wow, right, that's why I remember this
Speaker 1: essay because what has happened in the last two years.
Speaker 1: Right now, let's get back though to what is recounting
Speaker 1: of this. He says that one thing that I learned
Speaker 1: pretty early on, he said the Church of Satan and
Speaker 1: Antonina Bay's group that was a front front for our group.
Speaker 1: And he claims, again I don't have any way to
Speaker 1: vindicate this, but he claims a whole list of famous
Speaker 1: people who were members of his You know, he never
Speaker 1: says exactly what his group is, so we don't know
Speaker 1: who who exactly his cult is. It could be a
Speaker 1: number of different types of Satanic groups or cults. Who knows,
Speaker 1: but or he's it could be some unknown thing, right,
Speaker 1: who knows, but he claims a bunch of the list
Speaker 1: of famous people, including presidential family everybody knows, Sammy Davis Junior.
Speaker 1: He claims cult leader Garner Ted Armstrong was actually not
Speaker 1: a pseudo Christian but actually a Satanist. That's possible. He
Speaker 1: had mentioned ed Heath, which everybody knows. I think later
Speaker 1: on that that guy, right after all of his crimes
Speaker 1: in the UK government, that was clearly the case with him.
Speaker 1: He claims people like Reagan, right, Ron Reagan was gonna
Speaker 1: called JP Morgan, he says, So anyway, Then it goes
Speaker 1: on to say, but you can't always believe these people, right,
Speaker 1: because yes, Satanists they lie, right, I mean, they actually
Speaker 1: have the tension of breaking the Ten Commandments, so we
Speaker 1: never know if they are telling the truth. We take
Speaker 1: it with a grain of salt, but clean let's see.
Speaker 1: Then he goes on to say that everybody will recognize
Speaker 1: famous high ranking military people who were part of his
Speaker 1: circles and groups, probably a Kino, maybe Temple of set right,
Speaker 1: So I mean, I think he's definitely talking about Michael Aquino,
Speaker 1: but he mentions other military men as well who were
Speaker 1: part of satanning networks. Then he talks about the women
Speaker 1: that he meant and this is kind of surprising because
Speaker 1: I think a lot of people don't think about really evil,
Speaker 1: wicked women being committed to these groups, and he takes
Speaker 1: great pride in that. In fact, he says that when
Speaker 1: it comes to the pron and acts of what we'll
Speaker 1: call degradation, he says that the women excelled at this,
Speaker 1: and that matters because now we begin to see it
Speaker 1: tying into the organized crime, right, the organized crime which
Speaker 1: we've covered in our Mafia series, which people didn't they
Speaker 1: watched part one. A lot of people watched part one,
Speaker 1: then they didn't watch part two, when then we covered
Speaker 1: in the serial killer series, which we still have more
Speaker 1: to do. There's plenty of serial killers to do. There's
Speaker 1: there's a never there's always more serial killers, right, But
Speaker 1: we see the parallels again between what his culture are doing.
Speaker 1: What he's saying his cult does, the black operations, money
Speaker 1: operations that they're involved in UH and that they're tied
Speaker 1: to the high level politically in Australia, and he says
Speaker 1: they have obviously police, judges on the payroll, doctors, right,
Speaker 1: you know, all strata of society, PhDs. And he says
Speaker 1: that we intentionally corrupt and are corrupting. So you have
Speaker 1: to keep in mind that this goes perfectly in line
Speaker 1: with what Klaus says. Well, Claus doesn't explicitly say it,
Speaker 1: he kind of does when he says it will subvert
Speaker 1: democracy and take it over. It's more so in line
Speaker 1: with the way Lockstep presents the collapse, right, because remember
Speaker 1: at the end of Lockstep in scenario one, it says, uh,
Speaker 1: when when we corrupt the system, it just accelerates, it
Speaker 1: furthers the collapse, and then that allows the new system
Speaker 1: to come into play. So they don't mind. I was
Speaker 1: listening to people protesting politicians and jeering at you know,
Speaker 1: Biden and jeering at the Trudeau or whatever, and I'm
Speaker 1: just sitting there thinking, like, after i'd read this guy's essay,
Speaker 1: not that I didn't know this already, but I'm reading
Speaker 1: this guy's essay like they don't care if you jeer
Speaker 1: at them. In fact, they think it's funny. So people go,
Speaker 1: o'mogo tell Justin Drudeau what I'll think about it, Like
Speaker 1: he cares what you think. These are committed Satanists. They
Speaker 1: don't care what you In fact, they think it's funny
Speaker 1: that you protest them. So you have to understan and
Speaker 1: not everybody is as good as you. In fact, a
Speaker 1: lot of people see that. These people see that as
Speaker 1: a weakness. Right, that you project your goodness onto the
Speaker 1: world is seen as a preeminent form of weakness. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that we should assume the most evil
Speaker 1: of other people, but it is an issue of discernment
Speaker 1: when we figure out well, no, actually, if we live
Speaker 1: in a really degenerate age, then when it comes to
Speaker 1: powerful leaders, yes we probably should assume evil. Right, so
Speaker 1: you can't don't be naive, don't be stupid, and pay
Speaker 1: attention to what he's saying, because a lot of what
Speaker 1: he's saying has happened. Right again, this is written in
Speaker 1: twenty ten, so this is eleven years ago. So he
Speaker 1: goes on to say his organization was connected to a
Speaker 1: lot of high level political people, was connected to magical
Speaker 1: orders in UK and other places like this. He mentions
Speaker 1: this woman does He never says who she is, but
Speaker 1: he says Lilith. Her occult name is Lilith. If you
Speaker 1: don't know, these people take names. Just like people in
Speaker 1: the Orthodox Church take a saints name, you take affinacious
Speaker 1: Daniel Will, these people take evil names. So her name
Speaker 1: was Lilith. And he talks about there being breeders. He
Speaker 1: talks about there being lodges that were specifically connected to
Speaker 1: police departments, and he says that his group how a
Speaker 1: direct connect to the CIA people in the CAA, not
Speaker 1: the whole CIA, but people in the CAA via the
Speaker 1: black market operations. And this is interesting, and I think
Speaker 1: this is true, especially with what we've seen in terms
Speaker 1: of the scandals both not just in the Romancaloicy church,
Speaker 1: but also remember guys in the evangelical world. A lot
Speaker 1: of these corrupt, fake evangelical megachurch pastors, some of them
Speaker 1: are Satanists. Okay, they're not just conment, They're not just
Speaker 1: people making money. Now, if you watch True Detective, that
Speaker 1: was actually based on an actual evangelical cult, I think
Speaker 1: in Louisiana. It was in there's a Daily Mail article
Speaker 1: you can pull up about the basis for True Detective
Speaker 1: season one, and that was a Satanic group running an
Speaker 1: evangelical front. And I mean it should be obvious why
Speaker 1: they do this, Right, it's a great cover, right if
Speaker 1: you're running a cult, if you're running a black operation,
Speaker 1: a con operation, or if you're a Satanist to pretend
Speaker 1: to be a Christian. So he goes on to say
Speaker 1: that not only do powerful Satanists run some of the
Speaker 1: top escort agencies in Australia, he says they also get
Speaker 1: money from running sophisticated evangelical New Rite Conservative churches. Hm,
Speaker 1: is that hard to believe? Remember who was that goober
Speaker 1: guy who was supposed to be the advisor to Bush?
Speaker 1: W Remember him, the evangelical goober who was caught with
Speaker 1: doing meth with like skittles men? Remember him? I'm sure
Speaker 1: everybody in the chat. I can't remember that. I never
Speaker 1: remember that guy's name. I can see his goober face
Speaker 1: because he's got this smile like this. Remember that guy
Speaker 1: Bush's spiritual advisor, this megachurch pastor. I was like, dude,
Speaker 1: come on, who is so stupid as to believe this? Right? Well,
Speaker 1: a lot of people are, uh so Ted Haggard, Ted Haggard,
Speaker 1: that's it, I remembered it. Remember that. I don't know
Speaker 1: if Ted Haggard is the same I'm just saying that
Speaker 1: he would fit the bill of the kind of thing
Speaker 1: that this guy's describing, right like mega church front and
Speaker 1: we've covered in many cases mega church fronts. He's not
Speaker 1: talking about Billy Graham. Oh, I mean, Billy Graham could
Speaker 1: have certainly have been in this scenario, but he's not.
Speaker 1: I think he's talking about Now we know Billy Graham
Speaker 1: was a CIA. I said, that's in Ingdall's book Last
Speaker 1: hedgem On documented there, and it's in probably I could
Speaker 1: see those people. It was Ted Haggard anyway. So then
Speaker 1: he goes on to say, uh, what's the next Oh,
Speaker 1: this was crazy. Two big goals right away he says,
Speaker 1: we have two big goals in our group to meet
Speaker 1: by twenty The first goal is twenty ten and the
Speaker 1: next goal is twenty thirty. So the twenty ten goal,
Speaker 1: he said, was to make the Western world is essentially illiterate,
Speaker 1: functionally illiterate, and then by twenty thirty to deep hop
Speaker 1: the globe's population at least seventy percent twenty ten functionally
Speaker 1: illiterate in the West because the Western world is you know,
Speaker 1: leading leads the world, I guess in literacy so to speak.
Speaker 1: And then by twenty thirty, seventy percent reduction of population.
Speaker 1: So there you go. Right away, we immediately see two
Speaker 1: key global elite goals that perfectly align with a satanant
Speaker 1: goal not just to severely reduce the global pop but
Speaker 1: to severely reduce the literacy and functionality of people in
Speaker 1: especially the West. And I think a large part of
Speaker 1: that has happened. I mean, I don't think that. I mean,
Speaker 1: obviously the whole West isn't totally illiterate, but they have
Speaker 1: at least achieved some of that goal. And he says
Speaker 1: the governments, he says of the West, count on their
Speaker 1: sheeple to respond in a typical infantile fashion. This includes
Speaker 1: unconsciously identifying with a more powerful force, even if it enslaves.
Speaker 1: In fact, the more that the government brutalizes and humiliates them,
Speaker 1: the more so this is the case. Hello, have you
Speaker 1: seen a better example of that than in the last
Speaker 1: two years. So this guy, you can look at him
Speaker 1: as like a like a Satanic intelligence operative person basically
Speaker 1: looking at the lay of the land in his country
Speaker 1: and saying, these people are so domesticated and so dumbed
Speaker 1: down that the more they're brutalized, the more they will
Speaker 1: cry out for more tyranny. Hello, this was written eleven
Speaker 1: years ago. Then he moves on to say some of
Speaker 1: the great strategists of using our methodologies, he says, were
Speaker 1: people like Kissinger. Now he doesn't explicitly say Kissinger was
Speaker 1: a Satanist, but he says that Kissinger had this great
Speaker 1: idea to co opt evangelicals and Bible believers because of
Speaker 1: their stupidity, right, the moral majority type thing. So he says,
Speaker 1: use them to sort of marshal their energy in their
Speaker 1: their focus towards things like the war on the terrash
Speaker 1: right to use the phrase of w and he says
Speaker 1: that was supreme. That was a fantastical success to to
Speaker 1: take these evangelical goobers and focus their intention, their attention,
Speaker 1: and their their energy and their money towards foreign geopolitical operations.
Speaker 1: He backs up the claim. He doesn't mention what's her name,
Speaker 1: He doesn't mention Kathy O'Brien, but he does say that
Speaker 1: Gerald Ford was a was. He claims Geryl Ford was
Speaker 1: part of his cult, and that's something that Kathy Overren claims.
Speaker 1: He says, basically, this idea of Kissinger and Brazenski as well,
Speaker 1: is strategy of tension, and strategy of tension is just
Speaker 1: a basic way to keep you in perpetual fear. That's
Speaker 1: all right, It's literally just constant fear. And he says,
Speaker 1: this is really the fundamental essence of this whole system,
Speaker 1: how it works. Right, and if we think about it, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, what does Satan do? Right? This the thief
Speaker 1: comes to steel, kill and destroy, right, fear is essentially
Speaker 1: I mean, unholy fear is like the central key power
Speaker 1: element of Satan. Right, And he says the public will
Speaker 1: never catch onto this. They're totally unaware that they cannot
Speaker 1: can of the fact that there's a plan at work
Speaker 1: here and this this is correct. I think we can
Speaker 1: give this guy for all of his evil, we have
Speaker 1: to admit he's correct about this. Right. The public just
Speaker 1: can't recognize that it's more than corrupt government leaders. It's
Speaker 1: more than incompetent government officials. Right. How many people in
Speaker 1: the turn on the normy radio and what are they
Speaker 1: told live that's such an incompetent group of people in Washington? Okay,
Speaker 1: believe how incompetent George Biden is George Bush? There, No,
Speaker 1: they're not incompetent. The very thing that this guy said
Speaker 1: ten years ago what happened, has happened. It's a plan.
Speaker 1: It's not incompetence. Right, you're being dumbed down, you're being
Speaker 1: our aped, you're undergoing, you're you're being terrorized. And he
Speaker 1: says that we love that strategy of tension and this terror.
Speaker 1: He says, entities like the Federal Reserve. Right, the Federal
Speaker 1: Reserve takes your money, it takes your wealth and your energy.
Speaker 1: He says, we love that because it's vampiric. And essentially
Speaker 1: all of this worldview is is a predator prey predatory relationship.
Speaker 1: You're just cattle, You're just there to be food. You're
Speaker 1: a battery for our matrix. Right, And he says, and
Speaker 1: from this perspective, and this is why it melds so well,
Speaker 1: he says, with social Darwinism, is that you're subhuman, he claims,
Speaker 1: and he says that the terror techniques that a Kissinger
Speaker 1: of these people came up with Brazenski, the strategy of tension.
Speaker 1: He says, all this does is build a powerful sense
Speaker 1: of tension in society. This technique of building tension finds
Speaker 1: a scapegoat which we will call here the dark Path.
Speaker 1: This excuse me that the dark Path adepts know, he says,
Speaker 1: what the scapegoat is, because escapegoat becomes the society's the
Speaker 1: elites targeted enemy, right, so they just make up fabled enemies.
Speaker 1: Fabled enemies, he says, are only known to those who
Speaker 1: are in the dark Path because they can see the
Speaker 1: real plans, the real strategy. He says. The muggles are
Speaker 1: blinded to it. They can't see what's going on. And
Speaker 1: he says, anybody who did understand what was going on,
Speaker 1: I would understand that the strategy of tension, the war
Speaker 1: on terror is not a war against a foreign enemy.
Speaker 1: It's a war on the public. It's a war on you.
Speaker 1: You are the object of the war on a terror,
Speaker 1: the terish. You're either with that sure, terraish right, all
Speaker 1: this bush nonsense, And he says, you can see this
Speaker 1: very clearly in the domesticated enslaved population in Australia. He says,
Speaker 1: who are some of the dumbest and worst people. That's his,
Speaker 1: not mine, That's what he says. He says. If you
Speaker 1: doubt me, he says, then look at the Western world
Speaker 1: as a whole. He says, you have privately run banks
Speaker 1: that take all your money through taxes. He says that
Speaker 1: you are increasingly dumbed down each year. He says that
Speaker 1: you are spiritually blinded by a delusion. That's I mean,
Speaker 1: he's basically saying what the Bible says. Now he doesn't
Speaker 1: believe the Bible, right, This guy's evil, but he's evil
Speaker 1: enough to know that, or to have at least in
Speaker 1: some sense of what's actually going on. So he goes
Speaker 1: on to say that I wanted to this was interesting
Speaker 1: to do with the government in Australia. He says, well,
Speaker 1: actually I can't read all that. That parts a little
Speaker 1: too too much for the YouTube audience. I can't read that.
Speaker 1: So well, this will be a half an hour so that,
Speaker 1: by the way, if you want to see the second
Speaker 1: half of this, where I will go into more to
Speaker 1: do with materialism, the chaos magic, more to do with
Speaker 1: some of the things that you can't really talk about
Speaker 1: on YouTube. With this guy's essay, you can subscribe to
Speaker 1: Jasonalysis to the second half of this. I'll talk about
Speaker 1: how chaos magic ties into there being no meaning. I'll
Speaker 1: talk about famous people who are no longer with us,
Speaker 1: who Well, I won't say, but we'll talk about what
Speaker 1: they mean by aon and this kind of stuff. We'll
Speaker 1: talk about some of this book from craig Heimbigner, which
Speaker 1: deals with cults like this, and then we'll deal also
Speaker 1: with this essay from Carl Young, which is called Aon.
Speaker 1: And Young wrote this essay which I think summarizes a
Speaker 1: lot of these world views in a really concise five
Speaker 1: it's a famous five page essay, but actually it's actually
Speaker 1: pretty hard to find. I couldn't find this essay for many,
Speaker 1: many years, and then I did remember that it was
Speaker 1: in one of my college textbooks, so I dug it
Speaker 1: out and they reproduced it's called a Problem of Evil,
Speaker 1: and they reproduce the Krawl Young essay Aon. And yeah,
Speaker 1: so let's get back to this guy's essay. So he
Speaker 1: basically says that let me put it this way, and
Speaker 1: if you think about it, this is an interesting argument
Speaker 1: on the from the vantage point of if you're an
Speaker 1: atheist or a materialist, he says, as speaking as a
Speaker 1: self conscious occult a Satanist, he says, if Christianity isn't true,
Speaker 1: then normis are actually basing their morals on a purely
Speaker 1: pragmatic base. Right. He's saying, Look, the Western world doesn't
Speaker 1: believe in the so called Christian values that undergird their
Speaker 1: society anymore, most of them. Right, he's speaking in general. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's true, right, modern the modern world has basically rejected
Speaker 1: it's Christian roots. And he says, now, if that's the case,
Speaker 1: then when you people in the Western world who aren't religious,
Speaker 1: who aren't Christian, who aren't spiritual, when you appeal to morality,
Speaker 1: when you try to have moral foundations he's speaking of
Speaker 1: the masses, there's really no reason for it. It's just convention,
Speaker 1: it's just pragmatic. Right. Well, I'm a hold of these values,
Speaker 1: I guess, because you know, society does. And I'll get
Speaker 1: along in society better if I do that. And he
Speaker 1: has a point that will now wait a minute, but
Speaker 1: why should we do that? So on what grounds would
Speaker 1: you reject somebody who's a person committed to evil? If
Speaker 1: you have that worldview, If it's just pragmatism, then on
Speaker 1: what basis is a normally able to reject the pragmatic
Speaker 1: hedonism of a Satanist. So we see a kind of
Speaker 1: a Nietzschean dark logic at work here, which is actually
Speaker 1: a little more consistent. You could say, if there's no God, right,
Speaker 1: God doesn't exist, Christians is not true, anything goes I mean, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: I know we're excluding the possibility of other worldviews at
Speaker 1: this point, not because I'm interested in debating that at
Speaker 1: this point, but he's just talking about the Christian West, right,
Speaker 1: And he's saying that most people in the West have
Speaker 1: a sort of pseudo Christian worldview or the ghost of
Speaker 1: a Christian worldview, but there's no reason to believe it.
Speaker 1: And he says, and if that's the case, then you
Speaker 1: don't have any pragmatic basis to critique what we do, right,
Speaker 1: he's saying the Satanist guy, and he says, yes, we
Speaker 1: use mind control, Yes we brainwash people. Sure, but on
Speaker 1: what basis is that wrong? Because he says, isn't it
Speaker 1: self evident that the masses are just a herd? And
Speaker 1: if the masses are just a herd, and if Darwinism
Speaker 1: is true, what he takes as a given, which you know,
Speaker 1: we don't believe in Darwin is a critique Darwinism all
Speaker 1: the time. He says, if Darwinism is true and if
Speaker 1: the masses are just a unevolved cattle herd, then there's
Speaker 1: nothing wrong with what any of these culture sex do.
Speaker 1: Objectively speaking, you may not like it, but you not
Speaker 1: liking it has nothing to do with the true of
Speaker 1: the false right. And he says, if you don't like it,
Speaker 1: and if you want to be consistent, you would have
Speaker 1: to then reject the very thing that these groups do
Speaker 1: use terror, fear, mind control, brainwashing. Oh wait a minute,
Speaker 1: that's what your government does, you see. So he's basically saying,
Speaker 1: if you default to doing what Kiss, Brazenski and Klaus say,
Speaker 1: and they brainwash you and abuse you and misuse you,
Speaker 1: then on what basis do you say that the Satanic
Speaker 1: group is bad? Right? Because you see, he's pointing out
Speaker 1: a valid inconsistency. Now I'm going to show you. We're
Speaker 1: going to see that when it comes to this worldview,
Speaker 1: this worldview is not accurate. In fact, they will argue
Speaker 1: that there is no reason or logic. Oh okay, well
Speaker 1: then you don't have an argument against other world views. Right,
Speaker 1: so we can do a presubositional critique very simply to
Speaker 1: dismantle this whole worldview as relativism and nonsense and absurdity. Clearly,
Speaker 1: but at the same time, he's actually making a good point.
Speaker 1: Like David Hume, right, David Hume was an atheist. As
Speaker 1: a presubpositionalist, we often point to the fact that David
Speaker 1: hum makes really good arguments. He points out bad theistic arguments,
Speaker 1: and we give him credit. Yes, exactly, these are dumb
Speaker 1: theistic arguments a lot oftentimes. But that doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: this position, the atheist position, the satanic position, is necessarily
Speaker 1: correct because they're gonna do the same thing. They're going
Speaker 1: to turn around and contradict by saying that the highest
Speaker 1: good is just me as an individual. Well, now, wait
Speaker 1: a minute. If the highest good is you as an individual,
Speaker 1: and you're just a particular individual, then there's no higher good, right,
Speaker 1: And that's when they have to resort to, Oh well, okay,
Speaker 1: but then reality is just a projection of my mind.
Speaker 1: They have to resort to a form of syllipsism. Oh okay, well,
Speaker 1: syllipsism is true, then you can't actually know that syllipsism
Speaker 1: is true. Well wait, how because if syllipsism, if your
Speaker 1: mind is just is what has projected your whole reality,
Speaker 1: and it's just a projection, then there's not anything that's
Speaker 1: really true or objectively knowable. Right, We're back to the
Speaker 1: kantient lemma, and essentially it boils down to like maya
Speaker 1: or illusion. Right, the whole every aledge is your dream dude. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: if everything's illusory or a dream, then you're coming to
Speaker 1: know that it's illusory or a dream is also illusory
Speaker 1: and part of the dream. So you don't have any
Speaker 1: footing right to ever have a place to say this
Speaker 1: is true, this is false because it's all false. It's
Speaker 1: all it's all illusion, you see, and literally most of
Speaker 1: these esoteric and occult world views, I'm not joking. It's
Speaker 1: this dumb boil down to saying reality due to a
Speaker 1: projection of your mind. Dude. So if like you train
Speaker 1: your mind with a bunch of magic and meditation and rituals,
Speaker 1: you'll change reality. Bro. That's literally the whole thing. That's
Speaker 1: what they think, all of it, that's the whole world
Speaker 1: view is just change your mind and how you think,
Speaker 1: and that will change reality. Like the secret like Oprah
Speaker 1: level shit. I'm not joking, it's Oprah level stuff. Okay.
Speaker 1: But whether this guy is aware of that being a
Speaker 1: lie or not, I don't know. Regardless. Most people fall
Speaker 1: for this stuff not because of its logical consistency, as
Speaker 1: this guy says, but rather because it appeals to man's
Speaker 1: based desires. And that's the strength not just of Satanism
Speaker 1: or the world that we live in nowadays. It's really
Speaker 1: just about controlling people through based desires. There is a sense, yes,
Speaker 1: in which the herd is easily manipulated, But they're easily
Speaker 1: manipulated precisely because many degenerate elites brutalize the masses intentionally
Speaker 1: doing this, intentionally beating them down, despising them for the
Speaker 1: purpose of getting rid of them. And he totally admits
Speaker 1: all that right here. He says, yes, absolutely, And I
Speaker 1: think what's the most telling part is the sections I
Speaker 1: won't go into because it's a little much for you too.
Speaker 1: But and I'm not gonna even in the part too.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna get really gross or anything like that.
Speaker 1: But he basically just says it's a degradation ritual. Now,
Speaker 1: we've covered that many times with the pop stars. We
Speaker 1: all we've all seen the pop stars go from being
Speaker 1: the innocent girl to being the lady of the evening,
Speaker 1: to put it nicely, and why do they do that
Speaker 1: because it's ritual, it's a it's a practice of traumatization,
Speaker 1: not just for the people who are the pop stars,
Speaker 1: but also for the masses. Have you not figured out
Speaker 1: that the pop stars are oftentimes doing the same cult stuff?
Speaker 1: Is it an accident that they all like Crowley? I
Speaker 1: wonder what's going on. It's not hard to figure this out.
Speaker 1: It's all in the open, But you are intentionally kept
Speaker 1: blind because I think two things are going on here, right,
Speaker 1: we'll do the on from the vantaest point of the
Speaker 1: bad guys, the evil people. They believe that their degradations
Speaker 1: and their rituals and what they do literally affects the
Speaker 1: spiritual realm. This is what they believe to blind people
Speaker 1: in a spiritual sense, and in a sense, I think
Speaker 1: that does seem to happen right now. That doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that they have all this magical power. What I think
Speaker 1: happens is that from the perspective of God, from the
Speaker 1: Christian perspective, God allows these delusions. Right read second Thessalonians,
Speaker 1: where God allows these delusions, and then the delusions are
Speaker 1: they entrap those who willfully believe the delusions, right, that's
Speaker 1: the way. Second Thessalonians. It says basically that those who
Speaker 1: do not believe, they have their minds blinded by the
Speaker 1: God of this age who's Satan, so that they will
Speaker 1: not believe the truth, but will believe these lies as
Speaker 1: these spiritual delusions. Somebodys asked them about the website. Look,
Speaker 1: there's one tab on the website. It's called the members section,
Speaker 1: and everything that I do here is on the website.
Speaker 1: There's a few things that I do exclusive to rock Finn.
Speaker 1: Nothing has changed. The fact that I'm doing more content
Speaker 1: on rock fin has not changed from the content on
Speaker 1: the website. Nothing's different, So there's no reason to be
Speaker 1: confused about how to watch things on the website. Nothing
Speaker 1: has changed anyway. So if you would please support the
Speaker 1: stream through super chats, we'll get to those in a minute.
Speaker 1: But one of the things that they that this guy
Speaker 1: goes on to say next is the recruitment of street kids.
Speaker 1: And he says, yes, we've done very well with this.
Speaker 1: Now where do we hear about that? Oh, this has
Speaker 1: been going on for a long time. Charles Manson did this?
Speaker 1: Manson recruited street kids to be part of his satanant cult.
Speaker 1: Now you said, wait, a minute. Charles Manson, Yes he was.
Speaker 1: Charles Manson was out coming out of the Process Church,
Speaker 1: which is a Luciferian Satanic group, and it went back
Speaker 1: to Process right, these same types of groups. I don't
Speaker 1: know if this guy was necessarily connected to that. He's not,
Speaker 1: but there is a connection between the British Satanic groups,
Speaker 1: this guy and Process, and that's well known. Jimmy Savell
Speaker 1: wrote essays in the Processed Church magazine, as did Charles Manson.
Speaker 1: So he says, we recruit a lot of street kids,
Speaker 1: we use them for all kinds of things, We brainwash them,
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. And we've seen this with the serial killers.
Speaker 1: The serial killers, what do they do? The exact same thing.
Speaker 1: Now get this. He even goes on to say we
Speaker 1: study serial killers psychopaths. He says, we study them and
Speaker 1: we emulate them. And here's an odd statement I didn't expect.
Speaker 1: He says, in fact, some of the deadliest, most effective
Speaker 1: assassins in the world have in fact been women, and
Speaker 1: he claims they were part of his group. I don't
Speaker 1: know if that's true, but he says yes, And he
Speaker 1: says some of these women are in fact dedicated to
Speaker 1: Isis or lilith. I think that's probably true. Yeah. Then
Speaker 1: he goes on to say that one example, now I
Speaker 1: didn't know who this person was. I'd never heard of
Speaker 1: this person, but he claimed, this guy claimed, not saying
Speaker 1: it's true. This guy claims that a couple of people
Speaker 1: in his group that are well known is the Greek
Speaker 1: Princess at Katrini, so Princess Catherine of Greece. He claims, Now,
Speaker 1: I looked her up. She's no longer. She died, I
Speaker 1: don't know when, years ago, but he claims that she
Speaker 1: was part of his whatever his group is entirely possible.
Speaker 1: We do know that the you know, elites, royals, right,
Speaker 1: these people have had a long history, not everybody, obviously,
Speaker 1: many royals have been saints, but also many royals have
Speaker 1: been totally evil degenerates obviously, so who knows. Very plausible,
Speaker 1: especially we get into the higher grades of European nobility
Speaker 1: and people that are a long time you know, generational
Speaker 1: hint hint, hint, Masonic and magical families orders that's very
Speaker 1: well known. Not debatable. There. He mentions different intelligence assets
Speaker 1: and agents who had connections to his cult. And here's
Speaker 1: an interesting statement. He says, echoing Arthur Kessler, Bertrand, Russell H. G. Wells,
Speaker 1: John py Holdron Paul Erlick, the water, the Western water
Speaker 1: supply is intentionally laced with things that dumb the population down.
Speaker 1: And he says even though it's in the public well known,
Speaker 1: he says that it's people are so stupid and dumb
Speaker 1: down that they can do it in the open and
Speaker 1: nobody even knows. And that's true. That's true. Then he
Speaker 1: goes on to talk about more famous government people I've
Speaker 1: never heard of. I guess these are Australian government people.
Speaker 1: I don't know who they are. This is back in
Speaker 1: the sixties and seventies. He's talking about people back then
Speaker 1: that we're doing crazy stuff. Then he says, one example
Speaker 1: you look at as the Pine Gap facility in Australia
Speaker 1: as a connected to the NSA, which is interesting. He
Speaker 1: says that Michael Lochino had a role in that the
Speaker 1: NSA Pine Gap connection. There he goes on to talk
Speaker 1: about a like a Satanic version of the Nice and Creed.
Speaker 1: So apparently there's there's a Satanic version of the nic
Speaker 1: and Creed. I didn't know that. But we will stop
Speaker 1: there because we've been going for about an hour and
Speaker 1: twenty minutes. We'll get into, as we said in part two,
Speaker 1: Carl Jung's essay a on how it outlines a Satanic philosophy.
Speaker 1: And one of the groups that he mentioned I didn't
Speaker 1: want to talk about was this Typhoni in order, right,
Speaker 1: which is one of the splits. And so there is
Speaker 1: a Germanic connection, not in the sense of bloodlines, but
Speaker 1: a Germanic connection to Carl Kellner, Kenneth Grant, not Kenneth Grant,
Speaker 1: but Kenneth Grant coming out of He's British. But there
Speaker 1: was a connection between Theodore Royce, Karl Kellner and British occultist.
Speaker 1: There we go, who were these wealthy German industrialist Carl Kellner.
Speaker 1: So again remember that a lot of the origins of
Speaker 1: these modern cults literally come out of wealthy people and
Speaker 1: Kellner and then Germer who ended up being imprisoned by
Speaker 1: the Nazis. And then what survived out of that was
Speaker 1: the Gape Lodge in California. And this is where we
Speaker 1: get what's his name, l Ron Hubbard and JPL. I
Speaker 1: just want to blank you know what I'm talking about,
Speaker 1: Jack Parsons, right, But there's a split off of this.
Speaker 1: There's another branch, which is Kenneth Grant's typhoni in order,
Speaker 1: and if you watched my analysis of what's his name
Speaker 1: David Lynch's season three, we got into some of the
Speaker 1: Kenneth Grant mob zone stuff that tied into season three. Anyway,
Speaker 1: the point is not to go in all this. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that this guy's group is this group. He
Speaker 1: doesn't say that. He just said is that he met
Speaker 1: a lot of the people in these groups. So again
Speaker 1: don't know who is who, and it doesn't really matter
Speaker 1: ultimately except to understand that these groups, like the germanic
Speaker 1: Oto groups and whatnot, they're directly connected to the intelligence
Speaker 1: agencies there, and they're inte directly connected to the intelligence
Speaker 1: agencies in the UK and those groups and circles. Because
Speaker 1: we know Crowley was an MI five asset for a while,
Speaker 1: We know that British intelligence had a great interest in
Speaker 1: the occult groups Dennis Wheatlee, right. We know Ian Fleming
Speaker 1: based many characters like Liz Schiff Blowfeld on Crowley, so
Speaker 1: that's well known. And we also have to keep in
Speaker 1: mind in California without a Gopy Lodge with Jack Parsons.
Speaker 1: Everybody's heard Jack Parsons. Now, they've had whole TV shows, right,
Speaker 1: CBS whole series on Jack Parsons and him being part
Speaker 1: of the Gopy Lodge. So then that's where we get
Speaker 1: into the American intelligence groups because Parsons is actually leaking
Speaker 1: secrets to other countries. If you didn't know so, Parsons
Speaker 1: was doing intelligence espionage operations. He got in trouble I
Speaker 1: think for doing that at the time. Totally crazy psycho dude.
Speaker 1: Parsons was just insane, right, and by that I mean
Speaker 1: like rituals with his mom if you catch my drift, right,
Speaker 1: this kind of stuff. So yeah, I'll stop there again
Speaker 1: this if somebody really wants you can find this essay.
Speaker 1: It's public. Now what's hard to find is the full essay.
Speaker 1: I did find it after some searching, and it's about
Speaker 1: twenty pages total, so you can find it. But in
Speaker 1: part two, I'll get into their philosophy of history in
Speaker 1: the sense of how they see cyclical history and where
Speaker 1: it's going, and how they think that they're going to
Speaker 1: bring in a Satanic a. Now I'm not saying they're
Speaker 1: going to bring a Satanic aon it could be the
Speaker 1: end times. It could be an antichrist system that coincides
Speaker 1: between the Christian perspective and what these guys are say
Speaker 1: they could be, or maybe it's not the end of
Speaker 1: the world and these people just have sort of delusions
Speaker 1: of grandeur and how they're going to set up a
Speaker 1: global government. But regardless, what we've seen is that the
Speaker 1: goals are the same as what we've seen in the
Speaker 1: writings of the elite. So it really doesn't matter whether
Speaker 1: this elitist is an atheist or that elitist is a satanist,
Speaker 1: because ultimately it's the same game plan, it's the same
Speaker 1: end goal, and it's public and old essays like this,
Speaker 1: which at the time just sounded really outlandish, don't sound
Speaker 1: outlandish anymore, especially when we look at the fact that
Speaker 1: right it talks about like Jeff Stein Effery type operations.
Speaker 1: Literally he says, we use Jeff Stein f He doesn't
Speaker 1: say Jeff Efstein, but he says, we use those operations
Speaker 1: to compromise all the politicians. Yeah, he says, of course, right,
Speaker 1: who doesn't know this, Oh, mugguls don't know this, That's
Speaker 1: what he says exactly. So let's get to the super chat.
Speaker 1: Thank you guys for supporting show tonight. Wow, we got
Speaker 1: up to almost nine hundred, which I didn't expect. So
Speaker 1: that's great to have such a white audience out here tonight.
Speaker 1: Scroll back to Orthodoxy chlor Queen twenty five dollars. Jay,
Speaker 1: This is great. Many thanks for helping with these issues.
Speaker 1: How powerful is the tag argument in deconstructing and ultimately
Speaker 1: destroying this paradigm amongst other demonic lies that the Satan
Speaker 1: author of this essay wishes to reveal and bring it pass? Well,
Speaker 1: I think by the end of the discussion you did
Speaker 1: hear a pre basic presubsisitional critique of the philosophic assumptions
Speaker 1: of this kind of a position, right, Because if there's
Speaker 1: no good, right, if the good is just transferred to
Speaker 1: being the evil. One problem is that even if I
Speaker 1: think that my own desires are the highest good, that's
Speaker 1: still a highest good. And so now we're in a
Speaker 1: position of how we're going to give an account for
Speaker 1: being and the good and objective standards. If our whole
Speaker 1: position is predicated on denying objective standards, Now there's no
Speaker 1: such thing as the good. There's only my taste and
Speaker 1: my desires, which are just epi phenomenon. Right, they're just
Speaker 1: projections of my mind or my subconscious That's what kral
Speaker 1: Young's gonna say too. By the way, kral Jung has
Speaker 1: no different worldview than these people do. The matter whether
Speaker 1: Carljung was like a Satanist or not, like he has
Speaker 1: the same worldview, right, And he says, oh, it's just
Speaker 1: a projection of your mind. So the skilled magician is
Speaker 1: the guy who can change his mind to change the projector. Right,
Speaker 1: It's like your mind's a projector and you're just watching.
Speaker 1: Your life is like a projection screen that you're watching, right,
Speaker 1: Club Celesio, that's what That's what Club Celentsia is about
Speaker 1: in mulhalland Drive. And so if you just change the
Speaker 1: projection through changing your mind, you'll change reality, dude, Right,
Speaker 1: it's literally that dumb Okay, well, no, just changing your
Speaker 1: mind and just willing something really hard or oh, if
Speaker 1: you do these rituals right, it'll it'll magically change the world. No,
Speaker 1: it doesn't actually change the world. But evil and giving
Speaker 1: yourself over to evil power does have an effect in
Speaker 1: the world, but it's not forever. It's a temporary thing.
Speaker 1: And evil destroys your evil doesn't give what it promises.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like all these people think that they're
Speaker 1: going to, you know, buddy up with the devil or something,
Speaker 1: and then the devil screws you over, and you're like, well,
Speaker 1: you screw me over because I'm the devil, dude, I
Speaker 1: screw people over. That's what I do. Right. It's the
Speaker 1: story of the turtle and the snake, the turtle and
Speaker 1: the scorpion, you know that stupid story about you know,
Speaker 1: I carried you across the river. Why did you sting
Speaker 1: me and kill me? Because I'm a scorpion. That's what
Speaker 1: I do. So interestingly, the refusal to accept the existence
Speaker 1: of evil by the noormy is the very thing that
Speaker 1: allows evil to our ape of the army. Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 1: Marta Grask ten dollars, Thank you very much. Appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Pallingteer five dollars. Jay, I heard you mentioned the orthox.
Speaker 1: Christianity is not egalitarian in nature. Correct With this in mind,
Speaker 1: what is the proper understanding of parables such as the
Speaker 1: workers in the vineyard. Okay, well two things, both things
Speaker 1: are true, right, So the workers in the vineyard parable
Speaker 1: points out that it's possible for the person to be
Speaker 1: rewarded who hasn't worked as long as a person who
Speaker 1: has worked their whole life based on the value of
Speaker 1: the work. Right. So it's not totally God turning, because
Speaker 1: Paul says in the Escaton star will differ from star
Speaker 1: in brightness based on the reward. Not everybody has the
Speaker 1: same reward gold, silver and straw. The straw gets burnt
Speaker 1: up right. In fact, in other parables, Christ also says
Speaker 1: that some will bear fold thirty right sixty one hundred.
Speaker 1: So even the other parables point out that there's differentiation.
Speaker 1: But the difference is that that parable, I think is
Speaker 1: talking about the quality of one's work. Irish cringe Lord,
Speaker 1: two dollars, Jay, I love your work. You remind me
Speaker 1: of a young Tucker. I'll have to do it trying
Speaker 1: to do the Tuckers stare that Noah's flood was worldwide. Yes,
Speaker 1: you can read the what is it anuma Alish, You
Speaker 1: can read the you know by ancient Babylonian accounts. You
Speaker 1: can read the ancient Chinese account So we got China,
Speaker 1: we got ancient Near East, we got accounts of the
Speaker 1: flood in Latin South America. Yes, I believe it was
Speaker 1: a How all that works, I don't know, but I
Speaker 1: think there is a good amount of evidence that it
Speaker 1: was global flood. What is a book on that? There's
Speaker 1: a book? What is it? I can't I can't even
Speaker 1: see it. I've got a book actually, just read surf
Speaker 1: from Rose Genesis, Creation, Early Man. There is a book,
Speaker 1: but I can't find it. It's over there where I
Speaker 1: can't see Doorman three sixty five dollars. I'm really glad
Speaker 1: you decided to cover this. Reminds me how our lives
Speaker 1: are in a engage in a spiritualil. Yeah. And it
Speaker 1: isn't it interesting that although in a sense, this this
Speaker 1: person being evil, is blinded, ultimately there's a degree to
Speaker 1: which the evil people who are really into their evil
Speaker 1: they can kind of see more than most of the
Speaker 1: so called Christians, precisely because this is a person who,
Speaker 1: you know, had a lot of criminal contacts in the
Speaker 1: organized crime world and the political world. So he's seen
Speaker 1: a lot of evil people and a lot of evil
Speaker 1: people in power, and so from that vantage point, he can,
Speaker 1: I guess, see more so about what's going on in
Speaker 1: the world than a lot of Christians, which doesn't make
Speaker 1: his evil world view correct. It's just that he has
Speaker 1: advantage point in an angle that a lot of people
Speaker 1: don't have, which allowed him, I think, to see, you know,
Speaker 1: unfortunately how the fallen world works. Put it that way,
Speaker 1: Mikhail the King of Kings twenty dollars, young boomer, Luciferian
Speaker 1: vampire slayer. Yes, and I'm just like Sarah Michelle Geller
Speaker 1: literally literally just like Sarah Michelle call me Buffy. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Tira phase on ten dollars, Thank you for your work.
Speaker 1: God bless that. Thank you, Tira. I'm not even phased
Speaker 1: by that. Phase on super Chat, Thank you well, Emmanuel,
Speaker 1: five dollars, shout out well Emmanuel, longtime super chatter we got.
Speaker 1: We got a lot of the old school homies in
Speaker 1: the chat, homies in the chat what's up homies? Be
Speaker 1: sure and hit like and share if you would, because
Speaker 1: we got a huge crowd. We don't usually get this
Speaker 1: on a Wednesday night, but it's a hot topic, right,
Speaker 1: so if you would hit like and share and are
Speaker 1: you planning to do videos on Revelation? Well, as we know,
Speaker 1: the Apocalypse is a very difficult book. I don't think
Speaker 1: I would be ready to really get into it until
Speaker 1: I had read a lot more of the text that
Speaker 1: I want to read, so maybe one day, but not
Speaker 1: anytime soon. So I want to read both of the
Speaker 1: Lightheart's commentaries on Revelation before I do that. And there
Speaker 1: was another book. Oh my godfather is actually writing a
Speaker 1: book on Apocalypse right now too, so and he's doing
Speaker 1: that because he actually got he bought the James Jordan estate,
Speaker 1: not the estate itself, but like the rights to the books.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure I love you guys know who James
Speaker 1: Jordan is, so that's pretty cool. And he was telling
Speaker 1: me about all this, you know, a few months ago
Speaker 1: that he was going to because James Jordan's in bad health,
Speaker 1: so he's I'm assuming he's going to pass away soon,
Speaker 1: so he wants to take a lot of that insight
Speaker 1: from Jordan, who was very insightful and himself produce a
Speaker 1: book probably in the next five or ten years. So
Speaker 1: I would want to read Dean's book too and Lightheart's
Speaker 1: books before I would ever try to go into my
Speaker 1: own analysis the Pocket. But if you want a broad
Speaker 1: outline of it, you know, I agree largely with what's
Speaker 1: in Gentry's book Before Jerusalem Fell and what's in Chiltern's
Speaker 1: book Days of Vengeance. That would be you know, roughly
Speaker 1: we're up at things right now, Green Waves. Five dollars.
Speaker 1: American Horror Story Apocalypse. I did a video actually on
Speaker 1: AHS that series because actually, you're right, what is in
Speaker 1: that seat? And I'm not recommending that season of that series.
Speaker 1: It's it's pretty brutal, but that season is about the
Speaker 1: Satanic Alon, and it's like the elites destroy everything, going
Speaker 1: underground bunkers. They're in the underground bunkers while the world
Speaker 1: is like full of poison gases or something, and then
Speaker 1: they come back out right to set up the new
Speaker 1: Satanic aon. So absolutely, you're absolutely correct. That season of
Speaker 1: American Horror Story was literally about what we're talking about tonight, totally.
Speaker 1: And I would ventured to bet that the people who
Speaker 1: wrote that season, I don't even don't know who it was,
Speaker 1: they're one percent totally agreeing with this guy, I think.
Speaker 1: So Brian Gumble, what's up, dude, our favorite TV man.
Speaker 1: I'm sure that's not the real Brian Gumble, But isn't
Speaker 1: it Briant Gumbel or is it Brian Gumble? Two dollars
Speaker 1: A good stream Jay a fascinating video with Brian Callen
Speaker 1: and Sam Tripoli. That was a fascinating video. I would
Speaker 1: love to see a part two. Yeah, they talked about
Speaker 1: a part two back when we did that episode. If
Speaker 1: you don't know, of course, we did a hour and
Speaker 1: a half back and forth with Brian Callen, well known
Speaker 1: comedian Brian Callen playing the skeptic and me playing the
Speaker 1: conspiracy theorist, and it was a great episode. Everybody in
Speaker 1: rock Finn like that one. So if you haven't seen that,
Speaker 1: definitely go check that out over at a conspiracy social
Speaker 1: club on rock fan and I I would imagine hopefully
Speaker 1: we can do another episode. Dawn deary ten bucks. Great show,
Speaker 1: Thank you, don Darry much appreciate it. It's human milk. Vegan
Speaker 1: since five dollars and says silence, sh right the sign
Speaker 1: of hopocrty, silence, Dangerfield Hensley nine dollars and eleven cents.
Speaker 1: Cool numbers, dude, I'm sensing there's some significance there. JD.
Speaker 1: Would you consider doing the Brandon Kronenberg film Possessor? Actually
Speaker 1: Jamie and I talked about watching Brandon Kronenberg's movie the
Speaker 1: other day. I have not seen Possessor, but yes, in fact,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna actually, I'm must send an email see if
Speaker 1: he would come on an interview. I mean, I have
Speaker 1: no idea if you would. But you say that it
Speaker 1: is about mk Ultra did iluminate confirm that's what I figured.
Speaker 1: So yes, we'll try to watch it and then if
Speaker 1: it's not too gross, I can't if the movies are
Speaker 1: too gross, I can't watch. So but we'll see. Ja
Speaker 1: Melson's thirty Box and says, is Alistair actually emulating ancient
Speaker 1: rituals and practices or using this as an excuse for
Speaker 1: a made up pseudo religion? Probably a little bit of both.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think in a sense he was recreating
Speaker 1: real ancient pagan practices with a lot of the bodily
Speaker 1: fluid type stuff. And I also think at the same
Speaker 1: time it's kind of a create your own call. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's both of those things. Those aren't mutual exclusives, so
Speaker 1: I think it was both. But thank you for that, Jmail,
Speaker 1: Big Bala, big Bala five dollars. Do you see any
Speaker 1: signs of that the g l O bo h losing power?
Speaker 1: I have heard people saying it. I don't know. It's
Speaker 1: it's difficult to tell because it's possible that these groups
Speaker 1: have overplayed their hand, but it's also it's also to
Speaker 1: gauge it because the world's a big place, and you know,
Speaker 1: some countries are having a conservative reaction and these kinds
Speaker 1: of things. And I think what we have to be
Speaker 1: aware of is that remember in lockstep, they have planned
Speaker 1: for the anti global elite reaction. They know we're going
Speaker 1: to be mad. Klou said it. I know you're angry,
Speaker 1: we know you're angry.
Speaker 4: We want you to be angry, we want you to
Speaker 4: cry against the government. Right, So remember it's not Trudeau
Speaker 4: and it's not Biden. It's not these government goobers that
Speaker 4: are running the show and Klausen company want you to be.
Speaker 4: They're the ones that they're the lightning rods that take
Speaker 4: all your energy and anger. Right, you're the two minutes
Speaker 4: of hate from nineteen eighty four. Right, they're not really
Speaker 4: running things.
Speaker 1: So I don't know. Good question, but I don't know.
Speaker 1: All right, I hope you guys enjoyed tonight show. If
Speaker 1: you want to see the full show, I'll have part
Speaker 1: two analyzing this essay up in the next day or two.
Speaker 1: Debscribe at Jays Analysis for four and nine five months
Speaker 1: sixty dollars a year. You get full access to the archives,
Speaker 1: the streams, the interviews, all of the stuff that we've
Speaker 1: talked about for the last five years, all the fifty
Speaker 1: plus global elite writings. Get your master's degree in globalism
Speaker 1: through Jay University. At Jasonelis's dot com. You can also
Speaker 1: buy the books and get signed copies of the books
Speaker 1: and Thoughts of a Pilgrim three dollars. Here's a great
Speaker 1: book on revelation, Revelation the Books from Zoe Press. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I haven't read that book, so I
Speaker 1: can't recommend that, but thank you for that recommendation. I'll
Speaker 1: definitely take a look at it Zoe Press. And of
Speaker 1: course also if you want access, go subscribe on Rockfin
Speaker 1: for some of that unique exclusive content over there, guys,
Speaker 1: because we did do a pretty deep dive into history
Speaker 1: of N culture operations in Australia and you can watch
Speaker 1: that here if you sign up on my rock are
Speaker 1: Okay really excellent babsa free speech based platform. We love Rockfin.
Speaker 1: Big fans of rock Fin also show sponsor Chalk dot Com.
Speaker 1: Be sure and support our bros over at Chalk They
Speaker 1: are we're working on them becoming really big sponsors of
Speaker 1: Jays Analysis, So shout out to our bros over there.
Speaker 1: You can use the promo code Jay. If you've lost
Speaker 1: your mojo, and I think probably a lot of you
Speaker 1: guys have not. Everybody got a lot of mojo in
Speaker 1: this audience. But if your mojo is lacking, you can retain, regain,
Speaker 1: build up, explode some of that mojo with chalk dot
Speaker 1: Com some of the most legit, she legit mushrooms out there.
Speaker 1: These guys are great. Look at all of those hundreds
Speaker 1: and hundreds of five star reviews. Go and use the
Speaker 1: promo code there in that link, Jay, and you will
Speaker 1: get a discount. So thank you to our sponsors Chalk
Speaker 1: dot Com and everybody. Have a good nine and uh
Speaker 1: uh yeah, realize, realize that this is what's going on.